4304_CentralCarolinaTire_Phase3_April2016_1stSemiAnnual_DIN26133_20160520

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
Explanatory Text for Notification Table
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III
Cameron, Harnett, NC
Permit # 43-04
April 13, 2016 Water Quality Monitoring

The results of the April 2016 groundwater and surface water quality monitoring
conducted at the Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill are generally consistent with the
results of previous monitoring conducted at the site. No RCRA metals were reported in
the surface water samples at concentrations that exceed the 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards or the 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standards. In
addition, no Appendix I VOCs were detected in any of the surface water or groundwater
samples collected from the site in April 2016.

The concentrations of mercury reported in the groundwater samples collected from
background monitoring well MW-10 (1.70 µg/L) and compliance monitoring well MW-11
(1.20 µg/L) slightly exceed the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard of 1.0 µg/L.
The April 2016 monitoring event is the second event in which mercury was reported at a
concentration in excess of the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard at
background well MW-10 and the first event in which mercury was reported at a
concentration in excess of the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard at
compliance well MW-11. Monitoring well MW-11 is located hydraulically down gradient
from background monitoring well MW-10. Inasmuch as the reported concentration of
mercury at MW-10 is higher than that at MW-11, it is concluded that the source of
mercury in groundwater is located hydraulically up gradient of the landfill and not related
to operation of the landfill. None of the other reported concentrations of metals detected
in any of the groundwater samples exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards.

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]

May 17, 2016

Ms. Elizabeth S. Werner, Hydrogeologist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646

RE: Report of Results
Semi-Annual Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring: April 2016
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III
Cameron, Harnett County, NC
Permit # 43-04

Dear Ms. Werner:

This report presents the results of semi-annual groundwater and surface water quality
monitoring conducted at the landfill site referenced above (Figure 1) in April 2016. The
scope of work performed included sampling and laboratory analysis of groundwater
samples from eight on-site monitoring wells (MW-10 through MW-14 and MW-16
through MW-18) and one surface water sample (SW-1 (EXP)). It is noted that
monitoring well MW-17 was abandoned on August 30, 2011 and replaced with
monitoring well MW-17AR in accordance with the facility Water Quality Monitoring Plan
submitted as part of the Application for Permit Amendment 5-Year Phase (2011-2016)
prepared by Garrett & Moore, Inc. The Water Quality Monitoring Plan was approved by
the NCDEQ, Division of Waste Management (DWM), Solid Waste Section (SWS), in a
letter to Central Carolina Tire Holdings, LLC dated August 10, 2011. The groundwater
and surface water samples were collected in accordance with the NCDEQ, DWM, SWS
Guidelines for Groundwater, Soil, and Surface Water Sampling Document and the
facility Water Quality Monitoring Plan. The sampling and data collection methods, as
well as the current and historical results of field and laboratory testing of the water
samples, are presented in the following sections.

– 2 – May 17, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
1.0 POTENTIOMETRIC PATTERN AND GROUNDWATER FLOW

Groundwater levels were gauged in the site groundwater monitoring wells on April 13,
2016 as part of the site monitoring. Depths to groundwater were measured using an
electronic water level probe that was thoroughly decontaminated between wells with a
non-phosphate soap and water wash followed in order by multiple rinses with distilled
water, an isopropyl alcohol rinse, and multiple distilled water rinses. Depth to
groundwater measurements were made after the wells were opened for a sufficient
period of time to allow water levels to equilibrate with atmospheric pressure. The
locations of the site monitoring wells are depicted in Figure 2. Groundwater elevation
data collected at the monitoring wells on April 13, 2016 are presented in Table 1. The
depth to groundwater across the site, as measured in the Type II groundwater
monitoring wells on April 13, 2016, ranged from 2.74 feet (MW-12) to 16.43 feet (MW-
16) below grade, which is consistent with the surface topography.

A water-table elevation contour map that was developed based on the April 13, 2016
groundwater-gauging data for the Type II monitoring wells is presented as Figure 3.
The pattern of the water-table contours indicates that the horizontal component of
shallow groundwater flow at the site is generally to the southeast, which is consistent
with the surface topography and drainage features at the site. The hydraulic gradient of
the water table across the site, based on the data depicted in Figure 3, varies from
approximately 0.004 ft/ft in the northern part of the site to 0.013 ft./ft. in the southeastern
part of the site.

2.0 RESULTS OF GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING AND
ANALYSIS

Groundwater samples were collected from the site monitoring wells and a surface water
sample was collected from the on-site location on April 13, 2016 for laboratory analysis
to monitor the quality of groundwater and surface water at the site. The groundwater
and surface water samples were collected and handled in accordance with the sampling
protocols included in the site Water Quality Monitoring Plan as well as the SWS
Guidelines for Groundwater, Soil, and Surface Water Sampling Document. It is noted
that monitoring well MW-10 serves as the upgradient, natural background well for the
facility, and monitoring wells MW-11 through MW-14 and MW-16 through MW-18 serve
as the downgradient monitoring wells. All reusable sampling equipment was properly
– 3 – May 17, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
decontaminated between sampling locations with a non-phosphate soap and water
wash, followed by multiple rinses with distilled water. New disposable nitrile or latex
gloves were worn during all sampling activities. Disposable sampling
equipment/material was discarded after each use.

Prior to groundwater sampling, all monitoring wells were purged using pre-cleaned
Teflon-lined disposable polyethylene tubing connected to a peristaltic pump under low
flow conditions. During purging, measurements were made in the field of the pH,
temperature, specific conductance and turbidity of the groundwater collected from the
monitoring wells, in accordance with SWS requirements. The results of the field
analyses of these parameters are presented in Table 1. Copies of Groundwater
Sampling Forms containing pertinent information recorded in the field during purging
and sampling at each groundwater monitoring well are presented in Appendix A. The
results of the field-measured water-quality parameters indicate that the values
measured in groundwater collected from the site monitoring wells were generally within
the applicable stabilization criteria (see Groundwater Sampling Forms). Groundwater at
the site is acidic to moderately acidic based on the pH values measured in the field
(4.20 to 5.05). Specific conductance values ranged from 17 (MW-13) to 183 (MW-10)
µS/cm in groundwater. Turbidity values ranged from 1.1 (MW-18) to 56.9 (MW-12)
NTUs.

A surface water sample was collected from monitoring location SW-1 (EXP), which is
located approximately 280 feet southeast of the planned limits of scrap tire disposal
along the primary drainage feature that bisects the southeastern portion of the Phase III
landfill footprint. The sampling location is depicted in Figure 2. The surface water
sample was collected in accordance with the protocol presented in the SWS Guidelines
for Groundwater, Soil, and Surface Water Sampling Document.

All groundwater and surface water samples were analyzed at a North Carolina-certified
laboratory for Appendix I volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by SW 846 Method 8260
and the 8 RCRA metals by EPA 6000/7000 series methods. Summarized results of
laboratory analyses for groundwater and surface water samples collected from the site
on April 13, 2016 are presented in Table 2. Summarized historical groundwater and
surface water quality data for the site are presented in Table 3. Copies of the original
laboratory reports are included in Appendix B.

– 4 – May 17, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
The laboratory analytical results for the surface water sample (SW-1 (EXP)) collected
from the site indicate that no Appendix I VOCs were reported in the sample. Low levels
of arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium and silver were reported in
surface water sample SW-1 (EXP), however, the reported concentrations were well
below the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standards and the 15A
NCAC 2B surface water standards applicable to the site.

The laboratory analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from the site
monitoring wells in April 13, 2016 indicate that no Appendix I VOCs were reported in any
of the groundwater samples. The results of the metals analyses of the groundwater
samples indicate that arsenic was reported in five of the samples, barium, cadmium,
and lead were reported in all of the samples, chromium and selenium were reported in
six of the samples, and mercury and silver were reported in three of the samples. The
concentrations of mercury reported in the groundwater samples collected from
background monitoring well MW-10 (1.70 µg/L) and compliance monitoring well MW-11
(1.20 µg/L) slightly exceed the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard of 1.0 µg/L.
Monitoring well MW-11 is located hydraulically down gradient from background
monitoring well MW-10. Inasmuch as the reported concentration of mercury at MW-10
is higher than that at MW-11, it is concluded that the source of mercury in groundwater
is located hydraulically up gradient of the landfill and not related to operation of the
landfill. None of the other reported concentrations of metals detected in any of the
groundwater samples exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater
quality standards.

3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The results of the April 2016 groundwater and surface water quality monitoring
conducted at the Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill are generally consistent with the
results of previous monitoring conducted at the site. No RCRA metals were reported in
the surface water samples at concentrations that exceed the 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards or the 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standards. In
addition, no Appendix I VOCs were detected in any of the surface water or groundwater
samples collected from the site in April 2016.

The concentrations of mercury reported in the groundwater samples collected from
background monitoring well MW-10 (1.70 µg/L) and compliance monitoring well MW-11
– 5 – May 17, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
(1.20 µg/L) slightly exceed the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard of 1.0 µg/L.
The April 2016 monitoring event is the second event in which mercury was reported at a
concentration in excess of the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard at
background well MW-10 and the first event in which mercury was reported at a
concentration in excess of the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard at
compliance well MW-11. Monitoring well MW-11 is located hydraulically down gradient
from background monitoring well MW-10. Inasmuch as the reported concentration of
mercury at MW-10 is higher than that at MW-11, it is concluded that the source of
mercury in groundwater is located hydraulically up gradient of the landfill and not related
to operation of the landfill. None of the other reported concentrations of metals detected
in any of the groundwater samples exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards.

If you have any questions or require further assistance regarding this report, please call
me at 919-995-0363. The next water quality monitoring event for the Central Carolina
Tire Monofill Landfill is scheduled for October 2016.

Sincerely,
Brian S. Boutin, P.G.
Consulting Geologist

Cc: Tim McNeil, Central Carolina Holdings, Inc.
Vance Moore, Garrett and Moore, Inc.
Craig Fortner, Garrett & Moore, Inc.
Drawn by: Reviewed by: Drawing #:
Drawing Date: 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill
Harnett County, North Carolina
Source: USGS 7.5’ Topographic Quadrangle Series
Murchisontown, NC 2010
Figure No. Project #:
Scale: USGS
1:24,000 05/31/2012
N
11112 Branding Iron Place Wendell, NC 27591
Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Central Carolina Tire
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
339
340
34
0
34
1
34
1
34
2
34
2
34
3
34
3
34
4
(344.24)
(337.78)
(331.71)
(329.50)
(337.67)
(344.16)
(343.29)
(336.63)
MW-10 27.0 2.0 356.28 353.74 12.04 344.24 19.0 5.05 183 6.1
MW-11 23.8 2.0 347.80 345.70 10.02 337.78 19.4 4.38 41 1.4
MW-12 21.6 2.0 336.58 334.45 4.87 331.71 18.3 4.36 21 56.9
MW-13 20.6 2.0 339.47 337.36 9.97 329.50 15.5 4.35 17 7
MW-14 12.6 2.0 344.12 341.86 6.45 337.67 16.7 4.77 45 5.1
MW-16 28.9 2.0 362.53 360.59 18.37 344.16 18.9 4.20 36 4.9
MW-17AR 20.0 2.0 352.99 350.70 9.70 343.29 16.9 4.59 60 25
MW-18 14.8 2.0 344.71 342.45 8.08 336.63 20.7 4.24 52 1.1
Notes:MSL = Mean Sea Level
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
GW = Groundwater
S.C. = Specific Conductance
ntu = Nephelometric Turbidity Units
Monitoring well construction data taken from October-December 2006 Sampling Event Monitoring Report prepared by Withers & Ravenel.
Well Depth
(Feet BTOC)pH S.C.
umhos/cm
Permit # 43-04
Monitoring Well and Groundwater Data
Table 1
April 2016 Sampling Event
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III
Harnett County, North Carolina
Well
Identity Temp. Co
April 13, 2016
Well Diameter
(Inches)
Field Parameters
Turbidity
(ntu)
Ground
Surface
Elevation
(Feet MSL)
Groundwater
Elevation
(Feet MSL)
Depth to
Groundwater
(Feet BTOC)
Top of Casing
Elevation (Feet
MSL)
ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS GWP Std NCAC 2L STD
(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
Acetone ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 6000
Acrylonitrile ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
Benzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 1
Bromochloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.6 NE
Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.6
Bromoform (Tribromoethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 4
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 10
2-Butanone (MEK), (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 4000
Carbon Disulfide ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 700
Carbon Tetrachloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.3
Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 50
Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3000
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 70
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.04
Dibromochloromethane (Chlorodibromomethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.41 0.4
1,2,-Dibromoethane (Ethylene Dibromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.02
Dibromomethane (Methylene Bromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.5 70
1,2-Dichlorobenzene (O-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 20
1,3-Dichlorobenzene (M-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 200
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (P-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 6
Trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 6
1,2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene Dichloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.4
1,1-Dichloroethene (Vinylidene Chloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 7
1,2-Dichloroethene (cis and trans isomers)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 60 60
1,2-Dichloropropane (Propylene Dichloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.6
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
1,3-Dichloropropene (cis and trans isomers)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.4
Ethylbenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 600
Iodomethane (Methyl Iodide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
2-Hexanone (Methyl Butyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 280
Methyl Chloride (Chloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3
Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 5
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (Methyl Isobutyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 560 NE
Styrene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 70
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.18 0.2
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene), (PCE)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.7
Toluene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 600
1,1,1-Trichloroethane (Methylchloroform)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 200
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.6 0.6
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene), (TCE)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3
Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 2000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.005
Vinyl Acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 88 88
Vinyl Chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.03
Total Xylenes ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 500
INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS GWP Std NCAC 2L STD
(in ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
Arsenic 0.59 J 0.64 J 0.48 J 4.0 ND ND 0.47 J 0.75 J ND NE 10
Barium 45 36 54 11 7 34 37 37 59 NE 700
Cadmium 0.10 J 0.086 J 0.16 J 0.088 J 0.089 J 0.097 J 0.11 J 0.094 J 0.11 J NE 2
Chromium 0.79 J ND 0.54 J 3.9 ND 0.51 J 0.63 J 2.5 0.60 J NE 10
Lead 1.1 0.26 J 0.69 J 1.7 0.27 J 0.27 J 0.71 J 1.4 0.94 J NE 15
Mercury ND 1.70 1.20 ND ND ND 0.45 ND ND NE 1
Selenium 0.36 J 8.4 0.98 J 0.72 J ND ND 0.42 J 0.52 J 0.79 J NE 20
Silver 0.018 J ND ND 0.013 J ND ND ND 0.017 J 0.038 J NE 20
Notes:
Values in boldface exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standard for Class GA groundwater.J = Estimated value above laboratory method detection limit and below SWSL or reporting limit.
NCAC 2L STD = North Carolina Groundwater Standard established in Title 15A of North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 2L B = Analyte found in associated field and/or laboratory blank.
GWP Std = Solid Waste Section Groundwater Protection Standard NE = No standard established.
ND = None detected above laboratory method detection limit.
MW-10 MW-12
Permit # 43-04
NS = Not Sampled, No sample exists for this sampling period
MW-17ARMW-11 MW-18
Table 2
SW-1 (EXP)MW-13 MW-14
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III, Harnett County, NC
Laboratory Results for Surface Water and Groundwater Samples
October 1, 2015
October 2015 Sampling Event
MW-16
Page 1 of 2
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-10
Arsenic 10 ND ND 1.91 J 2.25 J ND ND 1.5 J ND ND 1.40 1.90 1.80 ND 1.10 ND 1.60 0.77 J 0.64 JBarium70078.0 J 39.2 JB 53.8 JB 63.3 JB 27.8 JB 22.0 0.17 J 32.0 25.0 33.0 17.0 40.0 18.0 29.0 39.0 29.0 40.0 36
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.69 J ND ND ND ND 0.094 J ND 0.049 J ND ND 0.052 J 0.086 JChromium101.46 J 2.47 JB 1.45 JB 3.01 JB 2.86 JB 0.55 J ND ND 8.4 BJ ND 2.7 B ND ND ND ND 0.26 J 0.51 J ND
Lead 15 5.11 J 4.90 J ND ND ND 0.71 J ND ND 0.95 J 0.21 J 0.28 J 0.2 J 0.26 J 0.33 J ND 0.18 J 0.32 J 0.26 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND 0.281 J ND ND ND ND 0.019 J ND ND ND 0.18 J 0.34 0.15 J 1.80 0.23 1.70Selenium20NDNDNDNDNDND10.00 ND ND 7.20 6.50 7.70 2.00 3.80 3.50 8.60 6.00 8.4
Silver 20 ND 2.37 JB 3.41 JB ND ND ND ND ND 0.45 J ND 0.18 J ND ND 0.056 J ND ND ND NDAcetone6000ND1.83 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromoform 4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.10 ND ND NDTrichloroethene3NDNDND0.380 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND 5.54 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16Well No:MW-11
Arsenic 10 2.59 J ND ND 2.43 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.37 J ND ND ND ND 0.48 JBarium70019.5 J 55.1 JB 44.6 JB 60.5 JB 29.6 JB 65.0 51.0 33.0 25.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 29.0 63.0 23.0 55.0 43.0 54.0
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.1 ND 0.27 J ND ND 0.061 J 1.4 ND ND ND 0.14 J 0.16 JChromium101.31 J 6.94 JB 1.35 JB 3.99 JB 3.42 JB ND 1.5 J ND 7.2 B ND 2.8 B 1.1 B ND ND ND ND 0.64 J 0.54 J
Lead 15 ND 10.60 ND 5.01 JB ND ND 0.81 J ND 0.89 J 0.30 J 0.38 J 0.37 J 0.88 J 0.20 J 0.21 J 0.22 J 0.60 J 0.69 JMercury1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.86 1.20
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.47 J 0.70 J 1.00 0.62 J ND ND ND ND 0.83 J 0.98 JSilver20ND2.03 JB 3.91 JB 1.49 JB 1.56 JB ND ND ND 0.33 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.830 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/27/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-12
Arsenic 10 ND 2.32 J ND 3.00 J ND ND ND ND 0.12 J 0.38 J ND ND 2.70 0.83 J 14.00 0.63 J 2.10 4.00Barium70097.8 J 46.2 JB 23.8 JB 56.2 JB 24.8 JB 5.7 J 11 J 14.0 16.0 15.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 9.0 22.0 8.9 15.0 11.0
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.18 J 0.088 JChromium103.04 J 11.6 B 3.25 JB 7.16 JB 4.08 JB 1.6 J 2 J ND 5.60 ND 3.6 B 1.6 B 0.95 J 0.47 J 2.40 1.30 5.70 3.90
Lead 15 ND 6.31 J 4.80 J 9.68 JB ND 0.81 J 2 J ND 0.62 J 0.64 J 0.96 J 0.41 J 1.70 0.49 J 1.60 0.90 J 2.40 1.70Mercury1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.12 J ND
Selenium 20 ND 7.32 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.34 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.72 J
Silver 20 ND 1.93 JB 4.01 JB 1.82 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.013 JAcetone6000NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND6.60 ND ND ND
Chloroform 70 0.150 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDMethylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.390 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
2-Butanone (MEK)4000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 9.80 ND ND NDToluene600ND0.510 JB 0.510 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.5 ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/27/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-13Arsenic 10 3.79 J ND ND ND ND 3.1 J ND ND ND ND 0.60 J ND 0.50 J ND ND ND ND ND
Barium 700 9.36 J 19.8 JB 14.9 JB 18.5 JB 8.7 JB 7.4 J 4.8 J 6.3 J 7.5 3.9 J 6.0 7.1 11.0 4.5 J 4.2 J 4.9 J 13.0 7.0Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.19 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.10 J 0.089 J
Chromium 10 3.26 J 3.07 JB ND 3.60 JB 3.05 JB 2.1 J 1.3 J ND 3.6 B ND 2.6 B 1.1 B ND ND ND ND 1.50 NDLead15ND8.32 J 4.75 J 7.51 JB ND ND ND ND 0.41 J 0.24 J 0.21 J 0.18 J 0.83 J 0.12 J 0.26 J ND 1.1 0.27 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.068 J NDSelenium20NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.36 J ND ND ND ND ND ND
Silver 20 ND 2.88 JB 3.65 JB 1.12 JB 0.78 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDBromoform4NDNDNDND0.27 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-14
Arsenic 10 3.12 J ND ND 2.50 J ND ND 1.9 J ND ND 0.12 J 0.30 J ND ND ND ND ND ND NDBarium700113.0 180 B 185 B 177 B 159 B 130.0 91.0 110.0 87.0 110.0 100.0 80.0 67.0 38.0 26.0 28.0 42.0 34.0
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND 0.22 J ND 0.34 J ND ND ND ND 0.18 J 0.27 J ND ND ND 0.074 J 0.097 JChromium101.46 J 4.86 JB 1.77 JB 3.80 JB 5.02 JB 0.9 J 1.6 J ND 6.9 B ND 2.4 B 1.2 B ND ND ND ND 0.80 J 0.51 J
Lead 15 3.62 J 8.51 J 5.06 J 3.74 JB 8.24 J 1.7 J 1.7 J 1.4 J 1.80 1.60 1.70 0.82 J 1.10 0.43 J 0.035 J 0.22 J 0.94 J 0.27 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.019 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDSelenium20NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.80 J ND 0.16 J ND ND ND ND
Silver 20 ND 1.99 JB 3.11 JB 1.29 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.12 J ND ND ND ND ND NDAcetone60008.25 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 15.00 ND ND ND
Bromoform 4 ND ND ND ND 0.18 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDMethylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.560 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-16Arsenic 10 1.86 J ND ND 4.76 JB ND ND ND ND 0.67 J ND 0.41 J ND 0.44 J ND ND ND ND 0.47 J
Barium 700 8.81 J 69.8 JB 31.1 JB 28.8 JB 16.3 JB 27.0 19 J 24.0 38.0 33.0 31.0 38.0 48.0 41.0 42.0 35.0 37.0 37.0Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDND0.66 J ND ND ND ND 0.14 J 0.037 J ND ND ND 0.053 J 0.11 J
Chromium 10 ND 3.07 JB 1.87 JB 3.99 JB 2.76 JB 1.0 J 1.5 J ND 8.7 B ND 2.5 B 1.2 B ND ND ND ND 0.83 J 0.63 JLead15ND8.15 J ND 4.74 JB ND 1.1 J ND ND 0.66 J 0.41 J 0.55 J 0.55 J 0.97 J 0.49 J 0.49 J 0.37 J 0.56 J 0.71 J
Mercury 1 ND ND 0.114 J ND ND ND ND 0.092 J 0.17 J ND ND ND ND 0.028 J 0.15 J ND 0.46 0.45Selenium20NDNDNDND2.9 J ND ND ND 0.48 J 0.97 J 0.69 J 0.24 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.42 J
Silver 20 ND 1.66 JB 4.10 JB 1.85 JB 0.86 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDAcetone6000ND2.42 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bromoform 4 ND ND ND ND 1.06 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dibromochloromethane 0.4 ND ND ND ND 0.25 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDMethylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.560 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
NOTES:
Results in parts per billion (ppb)
ND - Not Detected above the laboratory method detection limit or practical quantitation limit (results prior to April 2007).
NA - Not analyzed for or not available
Values in boldface exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standards.
Results for sampling conducted prior to April 2007 as presented in previous GW reports prepared by Withers & Ravenel.
J = Estimated value above laboratory method detection limit and below SWSL or reporting limit.
B = Analyte found in associated field and/or laboratory blank.
Table 3
Historical Summary of Constituent Detections
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III
Permit # 43-04
Harnett County, North Carolina
Page 2 of 2
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/27/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16Well No:MW-17AR*Arsenic 10 ND ND ND 5.63 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.46 J 0.95 J ND ND ND 0.75 J
Barium 700 91.7 J 71.9 JB 89.5 JB 56.4 JB 68.6 JB 35.0 41.0 41.0 90.0 30.0 120.0 130.0 110.0 25.0 110.0 150.0 110.0 37.0Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.24 J 0.17 J 0.086 J ND 0.093 J ND 0.11 J 0.094 J
Chromium 10 1.76 J 2.47 JB ND 3.90 JB 2.58 JB ND 1.6 J ND 4.90 ND 2.6 B 1.2 B ND 2.30 0.32 J 1.10 1.50 2.50Lead15ND5.88 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.00 1.30 1.70 1.40 1.50 1.90 2.00 1.90 2.10 1.40
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDSelenium20NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.76 J 0.72 J 0.51 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.52 J
Silver 20 ND 2.26 JB 4.19 JB 1.51 JB 0.84 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.041 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.017 JBromoform4NDNDNDND0.27 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.450 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDToluene600NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.58 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/15/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-18
Arsenic 10 4.49 J ND ND 2.22 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.34 J 0.60 J ND 0.37 J 0.51 J ND ND 0.84 J NDBarium70026.3 J 43.1 JB 43.8 JB 48.6 JB 48.4 JB 41.0 41.0 46.0 41.0 40.0 41.0 39.0 57.0 31.0 46.0 43.0 55.0 59.0
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.23 J ND ND ND ND 0.050 J 0.039 J ND ND 0.081 J 0.11 J
Chromium 10 ND 2.32 JB 1.25 JB 3.90 JB 3.51 JB ND 1.5 J ND 4.70 ND 2.5 B 1.0 B ND ND ND 0.38 J 0.63 J 0.60 JLead154.04 J 4.07 J ND 6.38 JB ND 0.96 J 2.3 J ND 0.56 J 0.47 J 0.53 J 0.50 J 0.77 J 0.56 J 0.61 J 0.45 J 0.84 J 0.94 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.39 0.37 0.029 J 0.26 0.14 J 0.014 J NDSelenium20NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.67 J 0.75 J 0.92 J ND 0.22 J ND 1.90 4.20 0.79 J
Silver 20 ND 2.07 JB 3.72 JB 1.69 JB 0.95 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.038 J
60 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.75 NDMethylene Chloride 5 ND ND 0.910 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/23/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/5/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/2/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:SW-1(Exp)Arsenic 10 4.32 J ND ND 1.96 J ND ND ND ND 0.79 J 0.23 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.35 J 0.59 J
Barium 700 36.2 J 44.4 JB 17.9 JB 21.7 JB 10.5 JB 12.00 9.5 J 13.00 33.00 21.00 21.00 26.00 43.00 34.00 30.00 43.00 33.00 45.00Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDND0.2 J ND ND 0.31 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.049 J 0.10 J
Chromium 10 1.61 J 1.73 JB ND 2.71 JB 2.58 JB ND 1.3 J ND 8.30 ND 4.7 B 1.4 B ND ND ND ND 0.68 J 0.79 JLead154.88 J 6.43 J ND 4.49 JB ND 0.76 J ND 0.83 J 7.50 0.95 J 0.44 J ND 1.10 0.27 J 0.35 J ND 0.43 J 1.10
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.23 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.79 J 1.10 1.00 0.68 J ND 0.22 J ND 1.40 0.86 J 0.36 JSilver20ND2.53 JB 3.75 JB 1.66 JB 0.98 JB ND ND ND ND 0.22 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.018 J
Styrene 70 0.260 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
NOTES:
Results in parts per billion (ppb)
ND - Not Detected above the laboratory method detection limit or practical quantitation limit (results prior to April 2007).* - Monitoring well MW-17 was abandoned on August 30, 2011 to make way for landfill expansion
NA - Not analyzed for or not available and was replaced by monitoring well MW-17AR located outside the expansion footprint.
Values in boldface exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standards.
Results for sampling conducted prior to April 2007 as presented in previous GW reports prepared by Withers & Ravenel.
J = Estimated value above laboratory method detection limit and below SWSL or reporting limit.
B = Analyte found in associated field and/or laboratory blank.
Table 3 (Continued)
Historical Summary of Constituent Detections
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase III (Planned)
Permit # 43-04
1,2-Dichloroethene
(cis and trans isomers)
Harnett County, North Carolina

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
APPENDIX A

Groundwater Sampling Forms
EFM EQU PMENT CALIBRATION FORM
Profect#: eC a',r.t-Client:^, llrs
INSTRUMENT: Y\T fTC
SERIAL No.: lo t-l too 't'l :-
INSTRUMENT: Mt^)rooQ
SERIAL NO.: OOJ
Calibration Recorded eillfr
Lot# SeEt.io Exp: gi3iir-7
Exp: 'ri3rllu
Exp: rl:'tir
4b" /, ce'Gheck 7.0
c loC:'
Lot# grsl Exp: tol:,\r1
Calibration Recorded
EFM EQUI MENT
Project #:
CALIBRATION FORM
r.,{r6t' Tr,GClient: uh<nt u.t {
INSTRUMENT: V i r-)r 1 \'-
INSTRUMENT:
SERIAL NO.:A
-
g' \--
Galibration Recorded Bv 5 L
V{izl i ;Lot# 2 \ic.t 1?c* Exp: .l l: rl)
: ?lr, llt*a,1 9-r-,l,)i {s
t'1 Y',/
Lot# 8'tSl Exp: tol:,\11
Air Temp= /.\-^ ?
Air Temo= t f
Calibration Recorded
Date: 4l t3 /16
Time: Start c,RPC am/pm
Finish o tsE am/pm
INA TIRE, PERMIT #4304
4Collector(s)1J Leave; D Hill
Client. NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
Weather Conds: fv, r ,r v S-Y'-
No. of Containers
Groun Water Sample Collection Record
l/Piezo lD: ;A,'v ^17
Wett K Piezometer !
e. LeJgtn of Water Column - ' r' S- 1a-b;
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) | . a)
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method FLOW Pumping Rate: / C' O ml/min
b. Acceptance Criteria (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Pu Volume (@ _NA_ well volumes) _NA.
- Maximum Allowable Tu ity NTUs
10%- Stabilization of
Make Model
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured
a. TotalWell Length t.'a i^A
b. Water Table Depth 6 , c/ f
c. Field Testing Equipment
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters stab
lf no or NiA -
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material _pvc_
d. Casing Diameter _2"_
removed
n reached
below.
PERISTALTIC PUMP
Serial NumberYSI 556 a.i l:t cl *t c 5-
Yes,&fr*
No N/An!nnDN
Signature ,.'": :-U +2,.1.,r, |Xe.-Date .-4t r)/16
OLOGIC Date: 4/ (5 /16
NATIRE, PERM]T #/3O4 Time. Start c,g /O am/pm
Collector(s) 6 j L..avei,1)_ nitt
Client NAUTILUS
Project No: QENIEALCAB
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
Weather Conds: \Lrre nj r/ <-- 7
4304- '\nW I
Groun Water Sample Collection Record
ID:,,t''-/.-3
Well ry Piezometer tr
e. Length of Water Column i C . t.?(a-b)
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured Top of Casing)
a. Total Well Lengtn .tc. fO c. Casing Material _pvc-
d. Casing Diameter _2"-
removed
reached
PERISTALTIC PUMP
Yes,6*tu
b. Water Table Depth .-{ i 1
c. Field Testing Equi
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters
lfnoorN/A-E
SAMPLE COLLEGTION:
Serial NumberYSI 556 c.'(l<t t( 7t'.l
No N/ANDDDDD
t16
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) i -7
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method OW FLOW Pumping 3s1"' '3. c(: ml/min
b. Acceptance Criteria (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Pu Volume (@ _NA_- well volumes)
--NA
- Maximum Allowable T N/A NTUs
--aCYo
- Stabilization of
Make Model
Comments
Date_41 ('\
Groun Water Sample Collection Record
7Tl Lv, -/.
Well F- Piezometer n
Length of Water Column I ('-- ( -3
1a-O;
Calculated WellVolume (see back) -" I
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured
a. TotalWell Lengtn tt .? C
b. Water Table Depth
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing Equipment
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters stabi
lf no or N/A - Expla
SAMPLE GOLLEGTION:
Comments
Signature .4,
b. Acceptance Criteria defi (from workplan)
- Minimum Required P
- Maximum Allowable T
Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material _pvc_
d. Casing Diameter 2"_
FLOW Pumping Rate: l( C mt/min
10 o/o
: Make Model
it
removed
reached
PERISTALTIC PUMP
YesffiE-tu
Serial Number
No N/ADNnntrr
LOGIC_ Dale'. q 13 /16
TIRE, PEEMIf #904 Time: Start z'cr'C: am/pm
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTML
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
Weather Conds: lur.JnrV ( z
No. of Containers
4304-Mta"'ri-
RCRA METALS
a./:':Date_4| (3 116
PERr\nr#4304 ?''J: S,iJdkam/pm
Finish l9& am/pm
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
Collector(sf, -Jlbqvel
r/ ?- \--
Container T
500 ml PI-ASTIC
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured Top of Casing)
a. Totalwell Length i f --LC c. Casing Material -pvc-
d. Casing Diameter
-2-
removed
reached
PERISTALT]C PUMP
a. Purge Method FLOW Pumping Rate: i '1L' mlimin
b. Acceptance Criteria (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Pu Volume (@ _NA-- well volumes) _NA
- Maximum Allowable T N/A NTUs--fi-Yo- Stabilization of
Make Model
Ground Water Sample Collection Record
o llJ:/v\vL' - i g
Wett*T Piezometer I
e. Length of Water Column ? " i a 1a-01
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) f - '+
Serial Number
b, WaterTable Depth 1 ' CrK
WELL PURGING DATA
c. Field Testing Equipment
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidi$
Have parameters
lf no or N/A - Expla
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
Yesw+W
No N/AurtrtrDf,
Signature Date_41 [7 116
CENTRAL CAROL
Site Location: CAMERON. NC
therConds: -rL .tr'Ntz - i'
;EOLOGIC Date: 4l i Z nA
NA TIRE, PERMIT #4304 Time: Start t 3 t .?- am/pm
Finish lYrO am/pm
Collector(s) J Leaver-D Hill
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured Top of Casing)Well k Piezometer D
e. Lengthof WaterColumn 13 - <1 @-b)
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) .? - 2-
Grou Water Sample Collection Record
f,tU''-'^ t (
Serial Number
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method FLOW Pumping Rate: i C'C,-mumin
b. Acceptance Criteria (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Pu Volume (@ _NA_well volumes) _NA
- Maximum Allowable T itv N/A NTUs
- Stabilization of pa 10 o/o
Make ModelYSI 556
a. Total Well Length a 3 t f
b. Water Table Depth iC" c; ,?-
c. Field Testing Equipment
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters stabil
lfnoorN/A-E below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
c. Casing Material pvc--
d. Casing Diameter _2'_
PERISTALTIC PUMP
Yes4W
W
c?A* tc,r.(c'T
1 ..1 'lt 1r'I ( t,u/
removed
reached
No N/AuINDDX
Signature Date q {'< /16
OGIC Date. 4l i'7 116
TIRE, PERMIT #4304 Time: 513;1 I Y z?* am/pm
Collector(sl J Leaver,t Hill
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CEI!I841
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
Weather Conds. \v;J^rL/ i'.'
lC r.:C.)
No. of Containers
4304- rtqw't']
4304- /4wtt ,,4 500 ml PI-ASTIC
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured Top of Casing)
lllPiezo lD:
.t'tt,i-'- - 1 ^l ?
wel 6 Piezometer tr
e. Length of Water Column i'C .? C (a-O)
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) t ,-l
Grou Water Sample Collection Record
a. Total Well Length .Q.b , Y O
b. Water Table Depth ti :l O
c. Casing Material _pvc_
d. Casing Diameter _2"_
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method OW FLOW Pumping nate '? t)()ml/min
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _NA_ well volumes) _-NA.
- Maximum Allowable T ity N/A NTUs
10%- Stabilization of par
c. Field Testing Equipment : Make Model
e. Acceptance criteria
Serial NumberYSr 556 O(i/.:Ic / .j. .i
Yeg&&
No N/ANt]TNtrnE_
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
removed
reached
Have parameters
lf no or N/A - Expla below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:PERISTALTIC PUMP
Comments
Date_4| lj t16
OLOGIC Date. 4l 13 t16
NW304 Time: Start t t3?am/Pm
Finish /C -i c am/pm
Collector(s). J Leavq,)D Hill
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CE_NfB L
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
Weather Conds: lr-,,.vnry ?c'
liPiezo I
/t\Lw - i 6
Grou Water Sample Collection Record
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured Top of Casing)Well # Piezometer tr
e. Length of Water Column ? , 8'l
f. Calculated WellVolume lsee back) 1 "
a. TotatwellLength .?.tr LC
b. Water Table Depth i ? .i1
WELL PURGING DATA
c. Field Testing
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters
lf no or N/A -
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
c. Casing Material _pvc_
d. Casing Diameter _2_
removed
reached
below.
PERISTALTIC PUMP
Make Model Serial NumberYSI 556 [,,i/r*t+t,ic,i'
(a-b)
a. Purge Method OW FLOW Pumping 331s' .?c'( ' ml/min
b. Acceptance Criteria (from workplan)
- Minimum Required P Volume (@ _NA_ well volumes) _NA
- Maximum Allowable T N/A NTUs
---Tc-Yo
- Stabilization of
Yes No N/Agutr#nn.wnn
Signature -.4 -2 Date- 4/ t3 116
Groun Water Sample Collection Record
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured Top of Casing)
a. TotalWellLengtn 4C &,
b. WaterTable Depth i7 .C
+
ength of
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method OW FLOW Pumping P"1"' ,r{- (l mVmin
b. Acceptance Criteria (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Pu Volume (@ _NA_ well volumes)_NA
- Maximum Allowable T N/A NTUs--Ao/o- Stabilization of
Used: Make ModelYSI 556 f,"(/<tc_( 7.'' j
OGIC Date: 4l ('3 /16
NA T|RE, pEnnrttr *+go+ Time: Start I C 7c' am/pm
L ,so Collector(s)i'J Leavbio Hill
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERQN, NC
Weather Conds: \.t'
4344- ALt t e
ID:/t\Lv' - / C)
Piezometer n
WaterColumn I ? . Y C ta-ol
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) ? , tl
Serial Number
Well
e.Lc. Casing Material
d. Casing Diameter
_pvc_
_2"_
c. Field Testing E
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
n removed
reached
No N/AntrDDDTHave parameters
lf no or N/A -below
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Yes*wW
Method: PERISTALTIC PUMP
Comments
Date 4t t'3 t16
OLOGIC Date: 4/t 3 /16
Time: start 163{ am/pmPrqect No: CENIE L
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
RCRA METALS500 ml PLASTIC
Grou Water Sample Collection Record
Top of Casing)Well n
tD: p(J-f
Piezometer tlWATER LEVEL DATA: (measured
a. Totalwell Lengtn I[)' oc2
b, water rable Depth {, / I,
- Maximum Allowable T
- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing EquipmentlUsed:
e. Acceptance criteria
c. Casing Material pvc
d. Casing Diameter
-2-
removed
reached
PERISTALTIC PUMP
N/A NTUs3o/o
Make Model Serial NumberYSI 556 iofl(oeVqtt
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters s
lf no or N/A -below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
Yes No N/AfliltrEft tr.EDI
e. Length of water cotumn t.{' (t O-ol
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) I .-S?
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method oW FLOW Pumping aate: I O(2
-mvmin
b. Acceptance Criteria (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Pu Volume (@ _NA_ well volumes)-NA
Signature Date_4t I ) t16

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
APPENDIX B

Laboratory Reports
And
Chain-of-Custody Records

Page 1 of 60
Page 2 of 60
Page 3 of 60
Page 4 of 60
Page 5 of 60
Page 6 of 60
Page 7 of 60
Page 8 of 60
Page 9 of 60
Page 10 of 60
Page 11 of 60
Page 12 of 60
Page 13 of 60
Page 14 of 60
Page 15 of 60
Page 16 of 60
Page 17 of 60
Page 18 of 60
Page 19 of 60
Page 20 of 60
Page 21 of 60
Page 22 of 60
Page 23 of 60
Page 24 of 60
Page 25 of 60
Page 46 of 60
Page 47 of 60
Page 48 of 60
Page 49 of 60
Page 50 of 60
Page 51 of 60
Page 52 of 60
Page 53 of 60
Page 54 of 60
Page 55 of 60
Page 56 of 60
Page 57 of 60
Page 58 of 60
Page 59 of 60
Page 60 of 60
Page 1 of 60
Page 2 of 60
Page 3 of 60
Page 4 of 60
Page 5 of 60
Page 6 of 60
Page 7 of 60
Page 8 of 60
Page 9 of 60
Page 10 of 60
Page 11 of 60
Page 12 of 60
Page 13 of 60
Page 14 of 60
Page 15 of 60
Page 16 of 60
Page 17 of 60
Page 18 of 60
Page 19 of 60
Page 20 of 60
Page 21 of 60
Page 22 of 60
Page 23 of 60
Page 24 of 60
Page 25 of 60
Page 26 of 60
Page 27 of 60
Page 28 of 60
Page 29 of 60
Page 30 of 60
Page 31 of 60
Page 32 of 60
Page 33 of 60
Page 34 of 60
Page 35 of 60
Page 36 of 60
Page 37 of 60
Page 38 of 60
Page 39 of 60
Page 40 of 60
Page 41 of 60
Page 42 of 60
Page 43 of 60
Page 44 of 60
Page 45 of 60
Page 46 of 60
Page 47 of 60
Page 48 of 60
Page 49 of 60
Page 50 of 60
Page 51 of 60
Page 52 of 60
Page 53 of 60
Page 54 of 60
Page 55 of 60
Page 56 of 60
Page 57 of 60
Page 58 of 60
Page 59 of 60
Page 60 of 60