4304_CentralCarolinaTire_Phase1and2_April2016_1stSemiAnnual_DIN26132_20160520

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
Explanatory Text for Notification Table
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II
Cameron, Harnett, NC
Permit # 43-04
April 13, 2016 Water Quality Monitoring

The results of the April 13, 2016 groundwater and surface water quality monitoring conducted at
the Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II are generally consistent with the results of
previous monitoring conducted at the site. A trace level of acetone (5.9 µg/L) was reported in
surface water sample SW-1. The reported concentration of acetone is well below the 15A
NCAC 2B surface water quality standard. No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in either
surface water sample. Low levels of various RCRA metals were reported in both surface water
samples. However, the reported concentrations of metals in the surface water samples do not
exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standards.

The concentrations of barium (950 µg/L) and lead (18 µg/L) reported in the groundwater sample
collected from background monitoring well MW-9 exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L
groundwater quality standards. None of the reported concentrations of the RCRA metals
detected in the remaining groundwater samples exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards. Inasmuch as the exceedances of groundwater quality standards
were reported in the sample collected from the background well, it is concluded that the
elevated levels of barium and lead are unrelated to the closed landfill.

The results of analyses of the groundwater samples for Appendix I VOCs are generally
consistent with the historical site data. PCE was reported in the groundwater sample collected
from MW-8 (4.4 µg/L) at a concentration that exceeds the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards. No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in any of the
groundwater samples.

The results of a preliminary site assessment conducted in November 2010, as well as Phase 2,
3 and 4 site assessments conducted in April and May 2012, April 2013, and August 2014,
respectively, indicate that the source of PCE in groundwater at MW-8 is unrelated to the Phase
I/II landfill and is located in the vicinity of the maintenance shelter located north of MW-8. The
results of the preliminary site assessment are reported in the January 2011 Preliminary Site
Assessment Report, the results of the second phase of assessment are reported in the June
2012 Phase 2 Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Quality Assessment Report, the results of the
third phase of assessment are reported in the May 2013 Phase 3 Hydrogeologic and
Groundwater Quality Assessment Report, and the results of the Phase 4 site assessment are
reported in the October 2014 Phase 4 Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Quality Assessment
Report, all of which were previously submitted to the NCDENR Solid Waste Section.

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]

May 17, 2016

Ms. Elizabeth S. Werner, Hydrogeologist
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646

RE: Report of Results
Semi-Annual Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring: April 2016
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II
Cameron, Harnett County, NC
Permit # 43-04

Dear Ms. Werner:

This report presents the results of semi-annual groundwater and surface water quality
monitoring conducted at the landfill site referenced above (Figure 1) on April 13, 2016. The
scope of work performed included sampling and laboratory analysis of groundwater samples
from eight on-site monitoring wells (MW-2 through MW-9) and surface water samples from two
on-site locations (SW-1 and SW-2). The groundwater and surface water samples were
collected in accordance with the NCDEQ, Division of Waste Management (DWM), Solid Waste
Section (SWS), Groundwater Monitoring Guidance Document, and the facility Water Quality
Monitoring Plan. The sampling and data collection methods, as well as the current and
historical results of field and laboratory testing of the water samples, are presented in the
following sections.

1.0 POTENTIOMETRIC PATTERN AND GROUNDWATER FLOW

Groundwater levels were gauged in the site groundwater monitoring wells on April 13, 2016 as
part of the site monitoring. Depths to groundwater were measured using an electronic water
level probe that was thoroughly decontaminated between wells with a non-phosphate soap and
water wash followed in order by multiple rinses with distilled water, an isopropyl alcohol rinse,
and multiple distilled water rinses. Depth to groundwater measurements were made after the
wells were opened for a sufficient period of time to allow water levels to equilibrate with
atmospheric pressure. The locations of the site monitoring wells are depicted in Figure 2.
Groundwater elevation data collected at the monitoring wells on April 13, 2016 are presented in
Table 1. The depth to groundwater across the site, relative to the top of the PVC casing of the
– 2 – May 17, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
monitoring wells, ranged from 4.00 feet at MW-2 to 19.12 feet at MW-9, which is consistent with
the surface topography.

A water-table elevation contour map that was developed based on the April 13, 2016
groundwater-gauging data for the Type II monitoring wells is presented as Figure 3. The
pattern of the water-table contours indicates that the horizontal component of shallow
groundwater flow at the site is generally to the east-southeast, which is consistent with the
surface topography and drainage features at the site. The average hydraulic gradient of the
water table, based on the data depicted in Figure 3, ranges from approximately 0.035 ft./ft. in
west-southwest portion of the site to approximately 0.018 ft./ft. in the east-northeast portion of
the site.

2.0 RESULTS OF GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

Groundwater samples were collected from the site monitoring wells and surface water samples
were collected from two on-site locations on April 13, 2016 for laboratory analysis to monitor the
quality of groundwater and surface water at the site. The groundwater and surface water
samples were collected and handled in accordance with the sampling protocols included in the
site Water Quality Monitoring Plan as well as the SWS Groundwater Monitoring Guidance
Document. It is noted that monitoring well MW-9 serves as the upgradient, natural background
well for the facility, and monitoring wells MW-2 through MW-7 serve as the downgradient
monitoring wells. Monitoring well MW-8 is located immediately north of the landfill. Based on its
location relative to the groundwater elevation contours, MW-8 is located hydraulically cross-
gradient to the northern-most area of the landfill and hydraulically up gradient of most of the
landfill area. All reusable sampling equipment was properly decontaminated between sampling
locations with a non-phosphate soap and water wash, followed by multiple rinses with distilled
water. New disposable nitrile or latex gloves were worn during all sampling activities.
Disposable sampling equipment/material was discarded after each use.

Prior to groundwater sampling, all monitoring wells were purged using pre-cleaned Teflon-lined
disposable polyethylene tubing connected to a peristaltic pump under low flow conditions.
During purging, measurements were made in the field of the pH, temperature, specific
conductance and turbidity of the groundwater collected from the monitoring wells, in accordance
with SWS requirements. The results of the field analyses of these parameters are presented in
Table 1. Copies of Groundwater Sampling Forms containing pertinent information recorded in
the field during purging and sampling at each groundwater monitoring well are presented in
Appendix A. The results of the field-measured water-quality parameters indicate that the
values measured in groundwater collected from the site monitoring wells were generally within
the applicable stabilization criteria (see Groundwater Sampling Forms). Groundwater at the site
is acidic to slightly acidic based on the pH values measured in the field (4.41 to 6.15). Specific
– 3 – May 17, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
conductance values ranged from 60 (MW-8) to 1292 (MW-9) µS/cm. Turbidity values ranged
from 0.71 (MW-5) to 9.8 (MW-8) nephelometric turbidity units (NTUs).

Surface water samples were collected from locations SW-1 and SW-2. The sampling locations
are depicted in Figure 2. SW-1 is located approximately 140-feet south-southeast of the south-
central sedimentation pond and within the drainage feature that parallels the southern limits of
scrap tire disposal within the Phase I/II landfill. SW-2 is located approximately 250-feet south-
southeast of the southeastern sedimentation pond and within the primary drainage feature that
parallels the eastern limits of the Phase I/II landfill. The surface water samples from SW-1 and
SW-2 were collected in accordance with the protocol presented in the SWS Groundwater
Monitoring Guidance Document.

All groundwater and surface water samples were analyzed at a North Carolina-certified
laboratory for Appendix I volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by SW 846 Method 8260 and the
8 RCRA metals by EPA 6000/7000 series methods. Summarized results of laboratory analyses
for groundwater and surface water samples collected from the site on October 1, 2015 are
presented in Table 2. Summarized historical groundwater and surface water quality data for the
site are presented in Table 3. Copies of the original laboratory reports are included in
Appendix B.

The laboratory analytical results for surface water samples SW-1 and SW-2 indicate that a trace
level of acetone (5.9 µg/L) was reported in sample SW-1. The reported concentration of
acetone is well below the 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standard. No other Appendix I
VOCs were reported in either sample. Low levels of various RCRA metals were reported in
both surface water samples. However, the reported concentrations of metals in the surface
water samples do not exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standards.

The laboratory analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from the site monitoring
wells on April 13, 2016 indicate that tetrachloroethene (PCE) was reported at a concentration of
4.4 µg/L in the groundwater sample collected from MW-8, which exceeds the 15A NCAC 2L
.0202 groundwater quality standard of 0.70 µg/L. It is noted that the results of a preliminary site
assessment conducted in November 2010, as well as Phase 2, 3 and 4 site assessments
conducted in April and May 2012, April 2013, and August 2014, respectively, indicate that the
source of PCE in groundwater at MW-8 is unrelated to the Phase I/II landfill and is located in the
vicinity of the maintenance shelter north of MW-8. No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in
any of the groundwater samples.

The results of the metals analyses of the groundwater samples indicate that arsenic was
reported in five of the samples, barium, cadmium, and lead were reported in all of the samples,
chromium was reported in five of the samples, mercury was reported in one sample, and
selenium and silver were each reported in six of the groundwater samples. The concentrations
– 4 – May 17, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
of barium (950 µg/L) and lead (18 µg/L) reported in the groundwater sample collected from
background monitoring well MW-9 exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L groundwater quality
standards. None of the reported concentrations of the metals detected in the remaining
groundwater samples exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality
standards. Inasmuch as the exceedances of groundwater quality standards were reported in
the sample collected from the background well, it is concluded that the elevated levels of barium
and lead are unrelated to the closed landfill.

3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The results of the April 13, 2016 groundwater and surface water quality monitoring conducted at
the Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II are generally consistent with the results of
previous monitoring conducted at the site. A trace level of acetone (5.9 µg/L) was reported in
surface water sample SW-1. The reported concentration of acetone is well below the 15A
NCAC 2B surface water quality standard. No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in either
surface water sample. Low levels of various RCRA metals were reported in both surface water
samples. However, the reported concentrations of metals in the surface water samples do not
exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2B surface water quality standards.

The concentrations of barium (950 µg/L) and lead (18 µg/L) reported in the groundwater sample
collected from background monitoring well MW-9 exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L
groundwater quality standards. None of the reported concentrations of the RCRA metals
detected in the remaining groundwater samples exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202
groundwater quality standards. Inasmuch as the exceedances of groundwater quality standards
were reported in the sample collected from the background well, it is concluded that the
elevated levels of barium and lead are unrelated to the closed landfill.

The results of analyses of the groundwater samples for Appendix I VOCs are generally
consistent with the historical data presented in Table 3. PCE was reported in the groundwater
sample collected from MW-8 (4.4 µg/L) at a concentration that exceeds the corresponding 15A
NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standards. No other Appendix I VOCs were reported in
any of the groundwater samples.

The results of a preliminary site assessment conducted in November 2010, as well as Phase 2,
3 and 4 site assessments conducted in April and May 2012, April 2013, and August 2014,
respectively, indicate that the source of PCE in groundwater at MW-8 is unrelated to the Phase
I/II landfill and is located in the vicinity of the maintenance shelter located north of MW-8. The
results of the preliminary site assessment are reported in the January 2011 Preliminary Site
Assessment Report, the results of the second phase of assessment are reported in the June
2012 Phase 2 Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Quality Assessment Report, the results of the
– 5 – May 17, 2016
11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
third phase of assessment are reported in the May 2013 Phase 3 Hydrogeologic and
Groundwater Quality Assessment Report, and the results of the Phase 4 site assessment are
reported in the October 2014 Phase 4 Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Quality Assessment
Report, all of which were previously submitted to the NCDENR Solid Waste Section.

If you have any questions or require further assistance regarding this report, please call me at
919-995-0363. The next water quality monitoring event for the Central Carolina Tire Monofill
Landfill is scheduled for October 2016.

Sincerely,
Nautilus Geologic Consulting, PLLC
Brian S. Boutin, P.G.
Consulting Geologist

Cc: Tim McNeil, Central Carolina Holdings, Inc.
Vance Moore, Garrett and Moore, Inc.
Craig Fortner, Garrett & Moore, Inc.
Drawn by: Reviewed by: Drawing #:
Drawing Date: 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill
Harnett County, North Carolina
Source: USGS 7.5’ Topographic Quadrangle Series
Murchisontown, NC 2010
Figure No. Project #:
Scale: USGS
1:24,000 05/31/2012
N
11112 Branding Iron Place Wendell, NC 27591
Office: [phone]
Cell: [phone]
Central Carolina Tire
300
305
310
315
31
5
320
320
325
325
330
330
335
335
34
0
340
34
5
35
0
3
5
5
(305.30)
(305.94)
(316.45)
(318.28)(298.73)
(310.14)
(336.85)
(359.58)
MW-2 20.0 2.0 309.30 4.00 305.30 17.5 4.72 72 3.87
MW-3 20.0 2.0 315.20 9.26 305.94 16.8 5.26 108 2.45
MW-4 20.0 2.0 320.80 4.35 316.45 15.2 5.33 71 4.6
MW-5 20.0 2.0 322.40 4.12 318.28 19.3 5.26 69 0.71
MW-6 25.0 2.0 305.10 6.37 298.73 21.4 6.15 210 9.12
MW-7 20.0 2.0 315.80 5.66 310.14 18.7 4.41 62 1.65
MW-8 20.0 2.0 342.80 5.95 336.85 14.7 4.48 60 9.8
MW-9 30.0 2.0 378.70 19.12 359.58 13.6 3.88 1292 4.06
Notes:
MSL = Mean Sea Level
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
Monitoring well construction data taken from October-December 2006 Sampling Event Monitoring Report prepared by Withers & Ravenel.
Well Depth
(Feet BGS)
BGS = Below Ground Surface
GW = Groundwater
April 13, 2016
pH S.C.
umhos/cm
S.C. = Specific Conductance
Permit # 43-04
Monitoring Well and Groundwater Data
Table 1
April 2016 Sampling Event
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II
Harnett County, North Carolina
Well
Identity
ntu = Nephelometric Turbidity Units
Temp. Co
Well Diameter
(Inches)
Field Parameters
Turbidity
(ntu)
Top of Casing
Elevation
(Feet MSL)
Groundwater
Elevation
(Feet MSL)
Depth to
Groundwater
(Feet BTOC)
ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS GWP Std NCAC 2L STD
(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
Acetone 5.9 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 6000
Acrylonitrile ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
Benzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 1
Bromochloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.6 NE
Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.6
Bromoform (Tribromoethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 4
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 10 10
2-Butanone (MEK), (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 4000
Carbon Disulfide ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 700
Carbon Tetrachloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.3
Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 50
Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3000
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 70
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.04
Dibromochloromethane (Chlorodibromomethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.41 0.4
1,2,-Dibromoethane (Ethylene Dibromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.02
Dibromomethane (Methylene Bromide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.5 70
1,2-Dichlorobenzene (O-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 20
1,3-Dichlorobenzene (M-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 200
1,4-Dichlorobenzene (P-Dichlorobenzene)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 6
Trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 6
1,2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene Dichloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.4
1,1-Dichloroethene (Vinylidene Chloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 7
1,2-Dichloroethene (cis and trans isomers)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 60 60
1,2-Dichloropropane (Propylene Dichloride)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.6
1,1-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
1,3-Dichloropropene (cis and trans isomers)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.4
Ethylbenzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 600
Iodomethane (Methyl Iodide)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE NE
2-Hexanone (Methyl Butyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 40
Methyl Chloride (Chloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3
Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 5
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (Methyl Isobutyl Ketone)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 560 NE
Styrene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 70
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.18 0.2
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene), (PCE)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.4 ND NE 0.7
Toluene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 600
1,1,1-Trichloroethane (Methylchloroform)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 200
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.6 0.6
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene), (TCE)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 3
Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11) ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 2000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.005
Vinyl Acetate ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 88 88
Vinyl Chloride ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 0.03
Total Xylenes ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NE 500
INORGANIC CONSTITUENTS GWP Std NCAC 2L STD
(in ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)
Arsenic 0.45 J ND ND 1.0 0.33 J ND 1.3 0.40 J ND 1.1 NE 10
Barium 68 23 87 26 22 16 43 62 42 950 NE 700
Cadmium 0.081 J 0.080 J 0.11 J 0.077 J 0.21 J 0.17 J 0.13 J 0.12 J 0.17 J 0.67 J NE 2
Chromium ND 0.86 J 0.87 J ND 0.54 J ND ND 0.57 J 0.72 J 1.5 NE 10
Lead 0.43 J 0.41 J 1.5 0.45 J 0.47 J 0.26 J 0.61 J 2.6 1.0 18.0 NE 15
Mercury ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.068 J NE 1
Selenium 1.4 0.68 J 1.4 3.8 ND 0.53 J 1.0 0.47 J ND 6.1 NE 20
Silver ND ND 0.015 J 0.011 J ND 0.037 J 0.060 J ND 0.013 J 0.032 J NE 20
Notes:
Values in boldface exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standard for Class GA groundwater.J = Estimated value above laboratory method detection limit and below SWSL or reporting limit.
NCAC 2L STD = North Carolina Groundwater Standard established in Title 15A of North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 2L B = Analyte found in associated field and/or laboratory blank.
GWP Std = Solid Waste Section Groundwater Protection Standard
ND = None detected above laboratory method detection limit.
April 2016 Sampling Event
MW-7
NS = Not Sampled, No sample exists for this sampling period
Table 2
SW-1 SW-2 MW-5 MW-6
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II, Harnett County, NC
MW-3
Laboratory Results for Surface Water and Groundwater Samples
MW-9MW-2
April 13, 2016
Permit # 43-04
MW-4 MW-8
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-2Arsenic 10 ND ND ND 2.43 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.80 J ND 0.55 J 0.73 J ND ND ND ND 0.39 J NDBarium70017015211092.1 JB 162.0 97.5 JB 86.7 JB 115 B 73.4 JB 110.0 69.0 94.0 81.0 95.0 87.0 88.0 74.0 97.0 68.0 90.0 76.0 87.0
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.29 J 0.18 J 10.00 0.93 J ND ND 0.46 J 0.20 J 0.22 J 0.050 J 0.077 J ND 0.081 J 0.11 J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 4.58 JB 3.11 J 2.03 JB 1.77 JB 2.91 JB 2.67 JB ND 1.5 J ND 6.10 ND 2.3 B 0.83 JB ND ND 0.76 J 1.50 2.70 0.87 J
Lead 15 ND ND ND 1.09 J 3.97 J ND ND 4.82 J ND 1.6 J 0.68 J ND 0.45 J ND 0.73 J 1.10 1.60 1.30 1.20 1.20 2.50 1.50
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND 3.98 J ND 8.75 J ND ND ND 3.3 J ND ND 2.60 3.30 3.30 2.30 0.45 J 0.66 J ND ND 1.60 1.40Silver20NDNDNDNDND2.36 JB 3.57 JB 1.16 JB 1.25 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.015 J1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.23 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Methylene Chloride 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.160 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.260 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.390 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-3Arsenic 10 ND ND 3.3 J 3.39 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.92 J ND 2.10 3.20 2.40 2.70 0.98 J 0.39 J 0.95 J 0.88 J 2.00 1.00Barium700ND30.5 34.1 20.0 JB 38.4 J 25.5 JB 28.6 JB 29.5 JB 41.2 JB 31.0 39.0 37.0 44.0 40.0 50.0 39.0 42.0 16.0 33.0 22.0 53.0 26.0
Cadmium 2 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.40 ND ND ND ND ND 0.11 J 0.034 J ND ND 0.079 J 0.077 J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 5.06 JB 1.69 J 2.62 JB 2.62 JB 4.29 JB 2.95 JB ND 1.5 J ND 4.80 ND 2.3 B 0.70 JB ND ND ND 1.40 0.72 J ND
Lead 15 ND ND ND 1.31 J 3.60 J ND 3.77 J 5.60 J 7.01 J 0.97 J 1.9 J 1.2 J 2.30 1.70 2.70 1.10 1.20 0.20 J 0.39 J 0.40 J 2.00 0.45 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND 0.038 J 0.133 J 0.064 J 0.090 J 0.089 J 0.36 0.056 J ND 0.19 J ND 0.21 ND ND ND ND 0.035 J 0.025 J ND NDSelenium20NDNDND5.79 J ND 9.5 J ND ND ND ND 7.60 ND 9.20 11.00 13.00 9.60 3.50 0.93 J 3.60 2.80 9.00 3.80Silver20NDNDNDNDND2.27 JB 3.74 JB 1.60 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.011 JAcetone6000NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND32.3 J ND ND ND ND 2.7 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Benzene 1 ND ND ND ND 0.610 J ND ND 0.260 J 0.55 J ND ND ND 0.76 0.51 0.85 ND ND ND ND ND 0.84 ND
Bromomethane 10 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 560 ND ND 0.97 J ND ND ND ND ND 2.8 J 0.56 J 0.89 J ND 0.97 J ND 4.8 J ND ND 1.2 J 5 ND 0.85 J ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 6 ND ND ND 0.270 J 0.620 J ND ND 0.280 J 0.47 J ND ND ND 0.67 0.47 0.67 ND ND ND ND ND 0.51 ND1,2-Dichloroethene (isomers)60 ND 1.5 1.7 0.760 J 2.04 J ND 0.230 J 0.660 J 1.21 J 0.53 J 0.84 0.59 2 1.0 2.2 0.7 0.83 ND ND ND 1.40 NDMethylene Chloride 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.110 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.270 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND 0.140 J ND 0.330 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1.1 ND 0.490 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.59 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-4
Arsenic 10 ND ND 2.9 J 4.16 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.20 1.10 1.20 1.60 1.30 0.95 J 0.72 J ND 0.42 J 0.33 J
Barium 700 ND 23.7 20 20.9 JB 24.3 J 33.2 JB 29.6 JB 29.6 JB 22.2 JB 28.0 28.0 20.0 25.0 20.0 16.0 18.0 23.0 15.0 16.0 20.0 22.0 22.0
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.16 J ND 0.21 J ND 0.48 J ND ND ND 0.26 J 0.058 J 0.57 J 0.034 J 0.18 J ND 0.096 J 0.21 J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 4.09 JB 3.11 J 2.77 JB ND 3.40 JB 2.86 JB ND 1.6 J ND 5.00 ND 2.3 B 0.81 JB ND ND ND 0.54 J 0.78 J 0.54 JLead15NDNDND3.12 J 6.11 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.96 J ND 0.74 J ND 0.81 J 0.79 J 0.85 J 0.26 J 0.56 J 0.29 J 0.48 J 0.47 JMercury1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDSelenium20NDNDND3.73 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.4 J ND 2.40 2.90 3.00 2.40 0.78 J 0.39 J ND ND 1.00 ND
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.17 JB 3.90 JB 1.97 JB 1.03 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Benzene 1 ND ND ND 0.730 J 0.540 J 0.480 J 0.220 J 0.460 J ND 0.56 J ND 0.87 ND 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.77 0.51 ND 0.69 0.69 ND
Chloroethane 3000 ND 4.2 1.6 3.59 J 1.99 J 2.35 J 0.820 J 2.55 J ND 1.3 J ND 1.2 ND 1.7 1.4 1.9 ND 0.79 ND 1.1 ND ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 6 ND 1.0 ND 0.350 J 0.560 J 0.210 J ND 0.160 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,2-Dichloroethene (isomers)60 ND ND ND 0.210 J 0.560 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 560 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.53 J ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.310 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND 0.110 J ND 0.540 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-5
Arsenic 10 ND ND ND 4.83 JB 1.93 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.55 J 1.30 1.10 0.47 J 0.46 J ND ND ND ND ND
Barium 700 ND ND 19.3 58.2 JB 32.3 J 30.8 JB 30.9 JB 33.6 JB 23.8 JB 30.0 28.0 31.0 27.0 32.0 33.0 27.0 31.0 23.0 23.0 22.0 17.0 16.0
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.22 J 0.45 J ND ND ND 0.043 J 0.12 J ND ND 0.098 J 0.068 J 0.17 JChromium10NDNDND8.54 JB 5.67 J 1.58 JB 1.25 JB 4.10 JB 2.39 JB 0.60 J 1.7 J ND 5.00 ND 2.3 B 0.77 JB ND ND 0.32 J ND 0.81 J NDLead15NDNDND14.5 6.02 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.34 J 0.39 J 0.87 J 0.064 J ND ND 0.64 J 0.26 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND 0.058 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND 5.42 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.2 J ND 4.40 5.10 6.80 3.20 0.66 J 0.59 J ND 2.70 1.30 0.53 J
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.32 JB 3.74 JB 1.72 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.081 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.037 J
Bromoform 4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.16 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.210 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDTotal Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.280 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-6
Arsenic 10 ND ND 2.8 J 2.25 JB ND ND ND 3.08 J ND ND 0.9 J ND 2.20 2.20 1.70 1.60 0.98 J 0.69 J 1.30 0.88 J 3.30 1.30
Barium 700 ND 37.4 29.9 30.5 JB 26.3 J 36.1 JB 34.1 JB 30.1 JB 21.3 JB 13.0 16 J 18.0 14.0 28.0 22.0 31.0 29.0 31.0 39.0 36.0 42.0 43.0
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.26 J ND 0.37 J ND ND 0.088 J 0.054 J ND 1.90 0.15 J 0.10 J 0.13 J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 5.05 JB 1.31 J 1.88 JB ND ND 2.76 JB 0.60 J 1.2 J ND 4.40 ND 2.7 B 1.2 B ND ND ND 0.31 J 0.97 J NDLead15NDNDND1.62 J 4.43 J 6.14 J 3.70 J 3.50 J ND 0.74 J 2.7 J ND 0.87 J ND 0.44 J 0.58 J 0.44 J 0.26 J 0.33 J 0.90 J 2.20 0.61 JMercury1NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND 4.75 J ND ND ND ND ND 2.8 J 3.9 J ND 5.80 6.60 6.00 4.40 1.10 0.79 J 1.20 2.60 2.10 1.00
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.34 JB 3.79 JB 1.47 JB 0.78 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.060 J
Acetone 6000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.74 J 3.34 J 6.0 J 3.1 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Benzene 1 ND ND 1.4 1.21 1.03 0.780 J 0.880 J 0.990 J 0.81 J 0.56 J ND ND ND 0.26 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDToluene600NDNDNDNDNDND0.180 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDTotal Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.380 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Table 3
Vinyl Chloride
Permit # 43-04
Harnett County, North Carolina
Historical Summary of Constituent Detections
ND
Central Carolina Tire Monofill Landfill Phase I/II
0.03 ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 ND 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-7
Arsenic 10 ND ND ND 3.88 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.5 J ND 1.20 1.80 1.40 0.54 J 0.40 J 0.39 J 1.00 ND 0.58 J 0.40 J
Barium 700 ND 77 73.6 163 JB 64.2 J 70.7 JB 61.8 JB 63.0 JB 70.0 JB 67.0 65.0 67.0 54.0 65.0 59.0 62.0 52.0 64.0 55.0 59.0 52.0 62.0
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.17 J ND ND ND ND ND 0.11 J ND ND ND 0.059 J 0.12 J
Chromium 10 ND ND ND 5.47 JB ND 1.58 JB 1.46 JB 3.01 JB 3.05 JB ND 2.6 J ND 4.50 ND 2.8 B 1.3 B ND 0.57 J ND 0.86 J 0.55 J 0.57 J
Lead 15 ND ND 2.1 J 10.60 6.54 J 5.69 J 4.02 JB 5.74 JB 6.97 J 3.2 J 9.20 2.7 J 4.10 2.50 4.50 3.60 4.00 4.90 1.50 3.60 2.60 2.60Mercury1NDNDND0.043 J 0.097 J 0.062 J ND ND 0.117 J 0.023 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDSelenium20NDNDND3.05 J ND 7.96 J ND ND ND ND 3.7 J ND 4.40 5.10 4.70 3.60 0.96 J 0.70J 1.20 ND 1.90 0.47 J
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.25 JB 3.62 JB 1.69 JB 0.94 J ND ND ND 0.062 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Acetone 6000 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 8.70 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Benzene 1 ND ND ND ND 0.790 J 0.210 J 0.250 J 0.330 J 0.61 J ND ND ND 0.65 0.68 0.64 ND 0.61 ND 0.61 ND 0.79 ND
1,1-Dichloroethane 6 ND ND ND ND 0.150 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND1,2-Dichloroethene (isomers)60 ND ND ND ND 0.240 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDMethylene Chloride 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.23 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDToluene600NDNDNDNDND0.250 JB 0.320 J ND ND ND 4.90 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND 0.130 J ND 0.520 J ND 0.11 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-8
Arsenic 10 ND ND ND 2.03 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.35 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Barium 700 ND 41.5 42.5 32.1 JB 41.4 J 43.9 JB 46.1 JB 45.0 JB 39.2 JB 38.0 33.0 40.0 41.0 22.0 60.0 61.0 56.0 49.0 41.0 42.0 40.0 42.0Cadmium2NDND1.1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.59 J 0.17 J ND ND ND 0.12 J 0.064 J 0.053 J ND 0.092 J 0.16 J 0.17 JChromium10NDNDND5.03 JB 4.54 J 2.33 JB 1.25 JB 3.20 JB 2.95 JB 0.56 J 1.3 J ND 3.70 ND 2.3 B 1.2 B ND 0.47 J 0.82 J 0.52 J 0.88 J 0.72 JLead15NDNDND1.04 J 7.71 J 7.42 J ND 6.30 J ND 1.1 J 0.72 J 1.1 J 0.74 J ND 1.00 0.94 J 1.30 1.80 1.30 0.75 J 1.20 1.00
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.7 J 0.33 J ND ND ND ND ND ND
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.28 JB 3.90 JB 1.29 JB 0.8 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.013 J
1,2-Dichloroethene (isomers)60 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.99 ND 1.20 ND NDEthylbenzene29NDNDNDNDNDND0.120 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDTetrachloroethene0.7 ND ND 1.8 0.310 J 0.550 J 0.730 J 0.960 J 2.40 1.74 B 6.30 1.80 5.40 6.90 3.40 4.40 3.60 4.00 9.20 6.90 8.20 5.80 4.40
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.450 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.700 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:MW-9
Arsenic 10 ND ND 2.6 J 2.88 JB 5.04 J ND ND ND ND 15 ND 13 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1
Barium 700 360 242 310 462 JB 366.0 288 B 50.1 JB 210 B 311 B 680.0 230.0 940 390 800 390 320 540 640 430 510 590 950Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDNDND0.21 J 0.23 J 0.52 J 0.31 J ND ND 0.38 J 0.22 J 0.28 J 0.29 J 0.21 J 0.29 J 0.28 J 0.67 JChromium10NDNDND5.71 JB 1.24 J 1.73 JB 1.35 JB 2.82 JB 5.21 JB 1.0 J 2 J ND 8.3 J ND 3.2 B 1.2 B ND ND ND 0.50 J 1 2
Lead 15 ND ND ND 7.21 J 6.84 J 5.02 J ND ND ND 10.00 3.4 J 10 4 6 5 3 7 8 7.1 J 10 10 18
Mercury 1 ND ND ND 0.83 0.077 J ND ND ND ND 0.12 J ND 0.77 0.35 0.23 0.075 J 0.18 J 0.051 J ND ND 0.12 J 0.14 J 0.068 J
Selenium 20 ND ND 2.2 J 1.35 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4 2 1 ND 2 2 3 3 6
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.95 JB 1.18 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.34 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.032 J
Bromoform 4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.28 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDEthylbenzene600NDNDNDNDNDND0.210 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDMethylene Chloride 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.16 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Toluene 600 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.810 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Total Xylenes 500 ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.31 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:SW-1
Arsenic 10 ND ND 2.2 J 2.07 JB 2.86 J ND 2.78 J ND ND ND 0.61 J ND 1.90 ND 1.60 0.98 J 0.65 J 0.51 J ND ND 1.50 0.45 J
Barium 700 ND ND 17.6 18.7 JB 25.5 J 30.4 JB 384 B 36.2 JB 21.1 JB 19.00 32.00 38.00 38.00 24.00 29.00 23.00 24.00 23.00 44.00 30.00 29.00 68.00Cadmium2NDNDNDNDNDNDND0.370 J 0.28 J ND 0.3 J ND ND ND ND 0.20 J 0.052 J ND ND ND 0.091 J 0.081 JChromium10NDNDND5.76 JB 2.66 J 2.03 JB 2.09 JB 3.70 JB 2.49 JB 0.70 J 1.3 J ND 5.00 ND 2.6 B 1.5 B ND ND ND 0.91 J 3.80 ND
Lead 15 ND ND ND ND 5.39 J 6.07 J 7.11 J 3.91 JB ND ND ND ND 0.27 J ND 0.35 J 0.23 J 0.41 J 0.34 J 0.24 J 0.29 J 2.20 0.43 J
Mercury 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND 3.7 J 1.96 J ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.3 J ND 4.40 3.00 3.90 1.90 0.45 J 0.40 J ND ND 1.50 1.40
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.46 JB 2.07 JB 1.38 JB 0.87 JB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NDAcetone6000NDNDNDNDND2.51 JB ND ND ND ND 2.8 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5.90Benzene11.0 ND ND ND ND ND 0.260 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 560 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.1 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.88 J ND
Sampling Date:2L Standard 10/26/05 3/30/06 10/19/06 4/18/07 10/24/07 4/29/08 10/14/08 4/22/09 10/14/09 4/29/10 10/19/10 4/13/11 10/6/11 4/26/12 10/3/12 4/3/13 10/16/13 4/1/14 10/1/14 4/8/15 10/1/15 4/13/16
Well No:SW-2
Arsenic 10 ND ND 2.9 J 1.70 JB 2.92 J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA ND ND ND 0.51 J 0.47 J ND ND 0.42 J ND
Barium 700 ND ND 21.1 31.1 JB 14.3 J 30.5 JB 55.6 JB 27.5 JB 75.1 JB 48.0 40.0 31.0 NA 25.0 30.0 18.0 26.0 26.0 24.0 28.0 29.0 23.0
Cadmium 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.3 J ND 1.2 0.63 J NA ND 0.21 J ND 0.44 J ND ND ND 0.036 J 0.080 JChromium10NDNDND6.09 JB 5.66 2.47 JB 2.82 JB 2.82 JB 11.6 B 1.1 J 1.8 J ND NA ND 2.5 B 1.4 B ND ND ND 0.53 J 0.84 J 0.86 JLead15NDNDND0.350 J ND 3.79 J 6.25 J 4.42 J 21.3 ND 1.0 J 1.0 J NA ND 0.45 J 0.93 J 2.9 0.44 J 0.21 J ND 0.52 J 0.41 JMercury1NDND0.15 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Selenium 20 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4.2 J ND ND NA 1.90 3.00 1.10 0.43 J 0.42 J ND ND 0.92 J 0.68 J
Silver 20 ND ND ND ND ND 2.24 JB 3.73 JB 1.58 JB ND ND ND ND NA ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Notes:
Results in parts per billion (ppb) B = Analyte found in associated field and/or laboratory blank.
ND - Not Detected above the laboratory method detection limit or practical quantitation limit (results prior to April 2007).
NA - Not analyzed for or not available
Values in boldface exceed the corresponding 15A NCAC 2L .0202 groundwater quality standards.
Results for sampling conducted prior to April 2007 as presented in previous GW reports prepared by Withers & Ravenel.
J = Estimated value above laboratory method detection limit and below SWSL or reporting limit.
Historical Summary of Constituent Detections
Harnett County, North Carolina
Table 3 (Continued)
Phase I/II Tire Monofill Landfill (Active)

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
APPENDIX A

Groundwater Sampling Forms
EFM EQU PMENT CALIBRATION FORM
Profect#: eC a',r.t-Client:^, llrs
INSTRUMENT: Y\T fTC
SERIAL No.: lo t-l too 't'l :-
INSTRUMENT: Mt^)rooQ
SERIAL NO.: OOJ
Calibration Recorded eillfr
Lot# SeEt.io Exp: gi3iir-7
Exp: 'ri3rllu
Exp: rl:'tir
4b" /, ce'Gheck 7.0
c loC:'
Lot# grsl Exp: tol:,\r1
Calibration Recorded
EFM EQUI MENT
Project #:
CALIBRATION FORM
r.,{r6t' Tr,GClient: uh<nt u.t {
INSTRUMENT: V i r-)r 1 \'-
INSTRUMENT:
SERIAL NO.:A
-
g' \--
Galibration Recorded Bv 5 L
V{izl i ;Lot# 2 \ic.t 1?c* Exp: .l l: rl)
: ?lr, llt*a,1 9-r-,l,)i {s
t'1 Y',/
Lot# 8'tSl Exp: tol:,\11
Air Temp= /.\-^ ?
Air Temo= t f
Calibration Recorded
OLOGIC Date: 4/t 3 /16
Time: start 163{ am/pmPrqect No: CENIE L
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
RCRA METALS500 ml PLASTIC
Grou Water Sample Collection Record
Top of Casing)Well n
tD: p(J-f
Piezometer tlWATER LEVEL DATA: (measured
a. Totalwell Lengtn I[)' oc2
b, water rable Depth {, / I,
- Maximum Allowable T
- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing EquipmentlUsed:
e. Acceptance criteria
c. Casing Material pvc
d. Casing Diameter
-2-
removed
reached
PERISTALTIC PUMP
N/A NTUs3o/o
Make Model Serial NumberYSI 556 iofl(oeVqtt
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters s
lf no or N/A -below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
Yes No N/AfliltrEft tr.EDI
e. Length of water cotumn t.{' (t O-ol
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) I .-S?
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method oW FLOW Pumping aate: I O(2
-mvmin
b. Acceptance Criteria (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Pu Volume (@ _NA_ well volumes)-NA
Signature Date_4t I ) t16
LOGIC Date: 4/ t 9 nO
lne, FrnMrr *+go+ Time. start ifSf am/pm
Finish / i,t <-amlpm
Collector(s) J Leaver
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
Weather Conds:
No. of Containers
4304- lnw-ry 500 ml PLASTIC RCRA METALS
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured
a. Total weu Lenstn 2f.ql
b. Water rabre Depth 6.31
Grou Water Sample Collection Record
Top of Casing)well d Piezometer D
e. Length of Water Column I 8, 43 O-ol
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) 3.'l
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
c. Casing Material _pvc_
d. Casing Diameter _2"_
removed
reached
PERISTALTIC PUMP
Yes -E
ffi
b. Acceptance Criteria defi (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Volume (@ _NA_ well volumes) _NA.
- Maximum Allowable Tu NiA NTUs
--To/o
- Stabilization of par
c. Field Testing Equipment
oW FLow Pumping Rate:l f'd' mt/min
Make Model Serial NumberYSI 556 /-iiro?1'L
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidi$
Have parameters stabi
lf no or N/A - Expla below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
No N/AuuTND!
Signature Date _ 4l l3 t16
L9GIC Date: 4l 13 na
''"r,ilTffi:ill;ilProject No: CENTRAL
Location: CAMERON, NC
Collecto(s) J Leaver
Groun Water Sample Collection Record
iezo lD: fqr^'l- 7
Well d piezometer nWATER LEVEL DATA: (measured Top of Casing)
a. Total Well Lengtn 2C. ocr
b. Water Table Depth S .At,
WELL PURGING DATA
e. Acceptance criteria
YSt ss6 la4t eolqu
c. Casing Material _pvc_ e. Length of Water Cotumn /9. 31 ta-ol
d. Casing Diameter _2_f. Calculated WellVotume (see back) .I..3}
a. Purge Method FLOW Pumping Rate: I 0O milmin
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _NA_ wellvolumes) _NA
- Maximum Allowable Tu N/A NTUs---no o/o- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing Make Model Serial Number
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
removed
n reached
YeS No N/AEDDE-rnADDHave parameters stab
lf no or N/A -n below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
Method: PERISTALTIC PUMP
Signature Date- 41 tltt6
octc Date: 4/ 13 4q _
TIRE, PERl\nlT #4304 Time: st"tt f43 ! am/pm
Finish l9i{ am/pm
Collector(s) JleaveqP Hill
Ctient: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTML
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
Groun Water Sample Collection Record
Well/Piezo lD:r\t^-r'3
well d Piezometer D
e. Length of Water Column lO.lrl . t -O)
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) i , 7 i'
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured Top of Casing)
a. TotalWellLengtn W-c. Casing Material -PVc-
d. Casing Diameter
-2"-
removed
reached
PERISTALTIC PUMP
b. Water Table Depth 1' Zt
WELL PURGING DATA
- Maximum Allowable Tu
- Stabilization of
c. Field Testing EquiPment
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters
lf no or N/A - Expla below.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
a. Purge Method FLOW Pumping Rate: i Dd ml/min
b. Acceptance Criteria (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Pu Volume (@ -NA- well volumes)
-_NA
N/A NTUs
---Ao/o: Make Modei Serial NumberYSr 556 LO i-l t oo.14 L
Yes NO N/Axt]trFnfEINT
Signature Date 4t r3 t16
;Eg!OGIC _ Date: 4/ $ !1,6-, -NA TIRE, PERMIT #4304 Time: Start I I 5 > am/pm
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CEIITB L
Site Location: CAMERON. NC
Collector(s) J Leaver
500 mlPI.ASTIC RCRA METALS
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured Top of Casing)
a. TotalwellLengtn 2O..,=
iezo lD: f-. \^, - y
Well M Piezometer n
Serial Number
c. Casing Material _pvc_
d. Casing Diameter _2_
removed
reached
: PERISTALTIC PUMP
Groun Water Sample Collection Record
b. Water Table Depth \\t
c. Field Testing Equipment
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters stabil
lf no or N/A - Explai
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
YSI 556 I ou',ratl YU
Yes No N/AEUnETNIEt xtr
e. Length of water Column t i.6{ O-ol
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) t ff
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method OW FLOW Pumping nate:)-OD ml/min
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _NA_wellvolumes) _NA
- Maximum Allowable T ity N/A NTUs
10 o/o- Stabilization of pa
Make Model
Signature /Date _ 4/ i3 t16
OLOGIC Date: 4/ li no
W Time: Start l"Oli am/pm
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CEIIE L
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
Weather Conds: i Collecto(s) J
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured
a. Total Well Lengtn ?.0. u t-r
b. Water Table Depth '.f .f i
WELL PURGING DATA
c. Field Testing Eq
e. Acceptance criteria
Has requlred volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters stab
lf no or N/A - Expl below.
Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material _pvc-
d. Casing Diameter _2"_
e. Length of water Column 14.0{ O-ol
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back)
.l ' 15
Yesg
E
a. Purge Method oW FLOW Pumping Rate: I D O mvmin
b. Acceptance Criteria (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Pu Volume (@ _NA_well volumes) _NA
- Maximum Allowable T itv N/A NTUs
- Stabilization of pa 10 0h
Make Model
Groun Water Sample Collection Record
'F''t-r - !
Well El Piezometer tl
Serial Number
556
m0
lDe'/YZ
!t
removed
reached
Method: PERISTALTIC PUMP
No N/ALltrDtrNT
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
.:::::\:
Signature Date 4t t3 ltO
OLOGIC Date: 4t 13 t16
Time: start Qilf= am/pm
Finish I0/{ am/pm
Collector(s) J Leaver,
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
500 mIPLASTIC
zo,D:-a
Groun Water Sample Collection Record
WATER LEVEL DATA: (MEASUTEd
a. TotalWell Lengtn
'3O'U,
c. Casing Material _pvc_
d. Casing Diameter _2"-
FLOW Pumping Rate.ml/min
(from workplan)
Volume (@ _NA_ well volumes)
--NA
N/A NTUs-TT-v"
Make Model
YSI
well El Piezometer tl
e. Length of water column /O. {d -e-ol
f. Calculated WellVolume (see back) l.'7'7
Top of Casing)
b. water rable Depth ]lla-
WELL PURGING DATA
a. Purge Method
b. Acceptance Criteria
- Minimum Required
- Maximum Allowable T
- Stabilization of pa
c. Field Testing
e. Acceptance criteria
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters sta
lf no or N/A - Expla
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
Serial.NumberIo il/r:oLtLl556
mo
removed
reached
'HH H.6rr
PERISTALTIC PUMP
Signature Date-4t t) nG
OLOGIC Date: 4/ ,3 /16
T|RE, PERMIT msoq Time: 51"x t l3f am/pm
Client: NAUTILUS
Project No: CENTRAL CAROLI
Site Location: CAMERON, NC
Weather Conds:Collector(s) ! Leavgrl
43A4- rnvir.-L
500 mIPLASTIC RCRA METALS
Ground ater Sample Collection Record
/Vu.:'L
Well N.Piezometer n
e. Length of Water Column i L , Ccs 1a-b)
f. Calculated Well Volume (see back) 2.6
WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured
a. TotalwellLength 20, 0O
b. Water Table Depth 9. OO
WELL PURGING DATA
c. Field Testing Equipment
Has required volume
Has required turbidity
Have parameters s
lf no or N/A -
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Comments
Top of Casing)
c. Casing Material _pvc_
d. Casing Diameter _2-
n removed
reached
below
: PERISTALTIC PUMP
a. Purge Method _ L FLOW Pumping Rate,:39?--ml/min
b. Acceptance Criteria defi (from workplan)
- Minimum Required Volume (@ =NA_ well volumes)--_-_NA
- Maximum Allowable itv N/A NTUs
- Stabilization of par ---3YoMake Model
e. Acceptance criteria Yes No N/AEIt]DSaInB't]tr
Signature Date 4l t7 116

11112 BRANDING IRON PLACE, WENDELL, NC 27591
919-366-3663 Office ● 919-995-0363 Cell ● [e-mail]
APPENDIX B

Laboratory Reports
And
Chain-of-Custody Records

Page 1 of 60
Page 2 of 60
Page 3 of 60
Page 4 of 60
Page 5 of 60
Page 24 of 60
Page 25 of 60
Page 26 of 60
Page 27 of 60
Page 28 of 60
Page 29 of 60
Page 30 of 60
Page 31 of 60
Page 32 of 60
Page 33 of 60
Page 34 of 60
Page 35 of 60
Page 36 of 60
Page 37 of 60
Page 38 of 60
Page 39 of 60
Page 40 of 60
Page 41 of 60
Page 42 of 60
Page 43 of 60
Page 44 of 60
Page 45 of 60
Page 46 of 60
Page 47 of 60
Page 48 of 60
Page 49 of 60
Page 50 of 60
Page 51 of 60
Page 52 of 60
Page 53 of 60
Page 54 of 60
Page 55 of 60
Page 56 of 60
Page 57 of 60
Page 58 of 60
Page 59 of 60
Page 60 of 60
Page 1 of 60
Page 2 of 60
Page 3 of 60
Page 4 of 60
Page 5 of 60
Page 6 of 60
Page 7 of 60
Page 8 of 60
Page 9 of 60
Page 10 of 60
Page 11 of 60
Page 12 of 60
Page 13 of 60
Page 14 of 60
Page 15 of 60
Page 16 of 60
Page 17 of 60
Page 18 of 60
Page 19 of 60
Page 20 of 60
Page 21 of 60
Page 22 of 60
Page 23 of 60
Page 24 of 60
Page 25 of 60
Page 26 of 60
Page 27 of 60
Page 28 of 60
Page 29 of 60
Page 30 of 60
Page 31 of 60
Page 32 of 60
Page 33 of 60
Page 34 of 60
Page 35 of 60
Page 36 of 60
Page 37 of 60
Page 38 of 60
Page 39 of 60
Page 40 of 60
Page 41 of 60
Page 42 of 60
Page 43 of 60
Page 44 of 60
Page 45 of 60
Page 46 of 60
Page 47 of 60
Page 48 of 60
Page 49 of 60
Page 50 of 60
Page 51 of 60
Page 52 of 60
Page 53 of 60
Page 54 of 60
Page 55 of 60
Page 56 of 60
Page 57 of 60
Page 58 of 60
Page 59 of 60
Page 60 of 60