HomeMy WebLinkAbout24025_Crayton Printing - FG Soil Assessment Work Plan_20230926
Via Email
September 26, 2023
NCDEQ – Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Redevelopment Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Attn: Mr. Bill Schmithorst, PG
Re: Final Grade Soil Assessment Work Plan
Crayton Printing
Distribution Street and Dunavant Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 24025-20-060
H&H Job No. AKR-005
Dear Mr. Schmithorst:
On behalf of KA D&D Holdings LLC, please find enclosed a copy of the Final Grade Soil
Assessment Work Plan prepared for the Crayton Printing Brownfields property (Brownfields
Project No. 24025-20-060) located in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County.
Should you have questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at
(704) 586-0007.
Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Matt Bramblett, PE Haley Martin, PG
Principal Senior Project Geologist
Enclosure:
cc: Mr. Dan Coith and Mr. Dan Outen, Akridge (Via Email)
Ms. Kary Katherine Stukes, Moore & Van Allen, PLLC (Via Email)
Ms. Laura Truesdale, Moore & Van Allen, PLLC (Via Email)
Work Plan and Report Checklist
Version 3 March 2023
Minimum Requirements Checklist
Site Assessment Work Plans and Reports
NCDEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section– March 2023
Instructional Page
All references to Prospective Developers include follow-on owners who may be conducting
work in accordance with the Brownfields Property Management Branch.
To increase predictability and most efficiently assess Brownfields Properties and the
redevelopment timing requirements of Prospective Developers or follow-on owners, the
Brownfields Redevelopment Section has standardized the format for Site Assessments. This
format has been generated in the form of a checklist to allow for ease in submission by the
prospective developer’s consultant and for the Brownfields Redevelopment Section’s
completeness review. This checklist outlines the minimum requirements and submittal format
under the Brownfields Redevelopment Section for Assessment Requirements and Reporting. All
Assessment Work Plans and Report submissions to the Brownfields Redevelopment Section must
include this completed checklist in the outlined format.
These requirements allow DEQ to reduce review time for the Assessment Work Plan and Report
and increase process predictability for prospective developers. This checklist will also provide
reliable data for risk-based decisions and further expedite the project timeline. Any divergence
from these requirements will lengthen the process of assessing risks on the site, may necessitate
reprioritization of a project manager’s queue towards projects that meet these requirements.
Therefore, delaying production of the brownfields agreement and/or environmental management
plan. Any alterations to the checklist on a site-specific basis must be reviewed and approved by
the Section prior to implementation. However, in order to respect the schedule of all projects in
house and keep the Section’s entire project pipeline moving, we strongly recommend against
seeking changes to the checklist.
Based on a review of environmental and risk data from our project inventory, please note
there are some new points of emphasis that are included herein:
1. For ALL residential reuses; sub-slab vapor assessment (full list EPA TO-15) is required,
regardless if existing structures will be removed. If no structures or slabs exist on the
Brownfields Property, exterior soil gas assessment is required within all proposed
structure footprints.
2. ALL properties require groundwater data (VOCs, SVOCs and RCRA Metals) from a
minimum of three sample locations, depth to groundwater and a resulting potentiometric
map.
3. Soil shall be assessed based on areas of concern and redevelopment plans and across the
depth interval of the cut/grading.
Work Plan and Report Checklist
Version 3 March 2023
Environmental Site Assessment
Work Plan Checklist
Reviewed and checked by (Name): Carolyn Minnich, Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Title Page
The title page should include the following information. Letter style reports are acceptable, as long as
this information is somewhere on the first page.
☒ Title of Work Plan
☒ Brownfields Project Name (not the development name)
☒ Brownfields Project Number
☒ Date (updated with each revision)
☐ Revision Number
☒ Firm PE/PG License Number
☒ Individual PE/PG seal & signature
Section 1 – Introduction
☒ Provide the site location, address, and acreage.
☐ Provide a BRIEF summary of the history of the property and its history in the Section. For example:
reiterate RECs from a Phase I ESA, indicate if the scope of work was negotiated during a Data
Gap Meeting, etc.
☒ Briefly list and describe the data gaps the assessment is attempting to fill
☒ Indicate if the assessment data is for the use of any other DEQ programs in addition to the
Brownfields Redevelopment Section (i.e. the site is a regulated UST, IHSB, etc. property)
Section 2 – Scope of Work
☒ Provide a general description of proposed scope of work covered in this plan (i.e. 2 new monitoring
wells, 6 groundwater samples, 5 exterior soil gas sampling points and 6 soil borings)
☒ Discuss samples to be collected by media and source area/location. Generally, the reasoning for the
sample locations selected.
☒ Describe depths of samples to be collected (Reference Table 1) or how that decision will be made
in the field, if needed.
☒ State for what each sample will be analyzed (briefly). Reference Table 1.
Note: For all residential reuses, sub slab vapor is required, if no slabs exist, exterior soil gas is required
within all proposed footprints.
Section 3 – Sampling Methodology
☒ Reference the guidance documents you intend to use. IHSB, EPA SESD, VI Guidance, Well
Construction Rules (NCAC 2C). Note deviations or methodology planned that is not covered by
Work Plan and Report Checklist
Version 3 March 2023
such guidance (e.g., multi-increment sampling, passive air samplers, mobile labs, Hapsite,
simultaneous indoor/outdoor radon, high-volume sub-slab vapor testing, PFAS sampling).
☒ Describe what will be installed (soil boring, temporary well, permanent well, sub-slab vapor, exterior
soil gas, etc.). Include construction details.
☒ Discuss installation methodology (Hand Auger, DPT, etc.)
Discuss Equilibration Times
Monitoring wells (equilibration time prior to development and equilibration post well
development should be 24 hours, per EPA standard protocols).
Vapor:
a. Sub slab vapor with minimally invasive points (e.g. Vapor Pins): Manufacturer’s
guidelines generally suggest 20 minutes may be sufficient with an airtight cap installed;
or
b. Sub slab vapor points (other than minimally invasive points) or exterior soil gas
points: at least 24 hours (to be purged at installation and at time of sampling with an
air-tight cap in place in the interim).
☒ Discuss sample collection procedures. Include the following, at a minimum:
Equipment to be used
Purging methods and volumes
Stabilization parameters for groundwater sampling
Field screening methods
Leak check procedures for sub-slab vapor and exterior soil gas samples (Note this is
required)
Discuss how and when vacuum readings will be collected (for summa cans)
Submission of the samples to the laboratory within 48 hours of collection and/or written
documentation of temperature maintenance if the situation requires extension beyond 48
hours prior to lab submittal
☒ Discuss sample point abandonment
Section 4 – Laboratory Analyses
☒ Discuss the proposed analyses (include method number, preparation method, if there are concerns
with short hold times, etc).
☒ Discuss any proposed limitations on the contaminants of concern, if any, and the reason for such
limitation (sufficient previous data, indoor air interferences, etc).
☒ Discuss laboratory certifications. Please note, NC does not certify labs for air samples. Please
specify what certification the proposed air lab holds.
☒ Indicate that the Reporting Limits/Method Detection Limits will meet applicable screening criteria
(to the extent feasible). Include reporting of J-Flags to meet criteria.
☒ Indicate what Level QA/QC will be reported by the laboratory. Level II QA/QC is typically
acceptable.
Section 5 – QA/QC
☒ Specify the duplicate sample frequency. Minimum requirement: 1 duplicate per 20 samples, per
media, per method.
☐ Discuss Trip Blank. 1 Trip Blank per cooler/shipment of groundwater VOC analyses is required.
☒ Discuss how the lab will have sufficient sample volume for MS/MSD analyses.
Work Plan and Report Checklist
Version 3 March 2023
☒ Discuss chain of custody and shipping.
Section 6 – Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management
☒ Discuss what IDW will be generated and how it is proposed to be managed. Management
recommendations should be in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T.1503 and 15A NCAC 02H.
0106. Generally, if the Brownfields Property has not previously been assessed, then all IDW
must be containerized and characterized prior to management. Previous assessment data that
indicate no Hazardous Waste (listed or characteristic) is likely to be encountered in the area of
proposed assessment will be required before thin spreading of IDW on-site is permitted.
Section 7 – Reporting
This section should discuss the components of the assessment report which will be prepared as a result
of the above sample collection. At a minimum, the report shall include:
☒ Title Page that is consistent with the requirements listed above.
☒ Reporting/summary of site work conducted for all sections outlined above in this checklist;
☒ Summary of findings and possible recommendations;
☒ All applicable tables and figures (shall include at a minimum the items below)
☒ Tables for tabulated analytical data per media sampled and analyzed, compared against
applicable screening levels, sample depths and depth to groundwater;
☒ Figure depicting actual sample locations collected, with each media depicted in the
legend, graphic scale and north arrow; and
☐ Groundwater potentiometric map, with graphic scale and north arrow.
☒ Appendices shall include (as applicable):
☒ Copies of field notes
☒ Boring logs for all soil borings, newly constructed monitoring wells, and exterior soil
gas locations
☐ Well construction and abandonment records
Work Plan Approval Signature Page (see Attachment 1). The Consultant shall complete
and submit the Approval Signature Page with the work plan submittal for DEQ signature.
Work Plan and Report Checklist
Version 3 March 2023
Attachments
☒ Attachment 1 – Work Plan Approval Signature Page
☒ Table 1 – Proposed Sample Locations and Analyses on a Summary Table that includes:
☒ Sample ID
☒ Sample Objective
☒ Proposed Depth(s)
☒ Analytical Method(s)
☒ QA/QC Samples
☐ Background Samples
☒ Figure 1 – Site Location Map
☒ Site location on a topographic map base
☒ Graphic scale and north arrow
☒ Figure 2 – Site Map should include the following
☒ Buildings
☐ Historical sample locations
☐ RECs or other areas of concern
☒ Proposed sample locations
☒ Sample identification labels
☐ Background samples
☐ QA/QC samples
☒ Graphic scale and north arrow
☒ High quality aerial suggested as the base map
☐ Figure 3 – Site Potentiometric Map that includes the following
☐ Buildings
☐ Groundwater sample identification labels
☐ Arrow noting direction of groundwater flow
☐ Graphic scale and north arrow
☐ Figure 4 – Site Plume Maps (groundwater, soil vapor, etc.)
☒ Figure 5 – Proposed Development (if available)
☒ Overlay of historical and proposed sample locations
☒ Graphic scale and north arrow
☐ Appendix – Summary of Historical Analytical Data (if needed) – to include tables and figures only.
i
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/akridge/akr.005 dunavant
brownfields assessment/final grade/work plan/24025 - crayton printing - fg soil assessment work plan.doc
Final Grade Soil Assessment Work Plan
Crayton Printing
Distribution Street and Dunavant Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 24025-20-060
H&H Job No. AKR-005
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1
2.0 Final Grade Assessment Activities ........................................................................................3
2.1 Final Grade Soil Sampling Activities ....................................................................................3
2.2 Quality Assurance / Quality Control .....................................................................................4
2.3 Investigation Derived Waste .................................................................................................5
3.0 Reporting .................................................................................................................................6
List of Tables
Table 1 Proposed Final Grade Soil Sample Summary
List of Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Proposed Final Grade Soil Sample Location Map
List of Appendices
Appendix A Required Overall Planting Plan
1
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/akridge/akr.005 dunavant
brownfields assessment/final grade/work plan/24025 - crayton printing - fg soil assessment work plan.doc
Final Grade Soil Assessment Work Plan
Crayton Printing
Distribution Street and Dunavant Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 24025-20-060
H&H Job No. AKR-005
1.0 Introduction
On behalf of KA D&D Holdings LLC (Prospective Developer or PD), Hart & Hickman, P.C.
(H&H) has prepared this Final Grade Soil Assessment Work Plan (Work Plan) for the Crayton
Printing Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 24025-20-060) located south of the
Distribution Street and Dunavant Street intersection in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina (Site). The Site consists of one approximate 2.85-acre parcel of land (Mecklenburg
County Parcel Identification No. 12104201) located in a mixed commercial and residential use
area of South End Charlotte. A Site location map is provided as Figure 1, and the Site and
surrounding area are shown in Figure 2.
A Brownfields Agreement between the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ) and the PD was recorded on October 1, 2021. The Land Use Restriction (LUR) 12.f. of
the Brownfields Agreement generally states that no occupancy of the Brownfields property may
occur after redevelopment until representative final grade soil samples have been collected in
areas at the Site that are not covered by building foundations, sidewalks, or asphalt or concrete
parking areas and driveways (hardscape). The Brownfields Agreement also generally states that
physical redevelopment of the Site will be completed in accordance with a DEQ-approved
Environmental Management Plan (EMP). The EMP prepared for the Crayton Printing
redevelopment received DEQ approval on December 8, 2020.
In accordance with the DEQ-approved EMP and LUR 12.f. of the recorded Brownfields
Agreement, final grade soil sampling will be conducted at the Site in areas that are not covered
with building foundations, sidewalks, or asphalt or concrete parking areas and driveways
following completion of redevelopment activities that disturb soil. Redevelopment of the Site
2
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/akridge/akr.005 dunavant
brownfields assessment/final grade/work plan/24025 - crayton printing - fg soil assessment work plan.doc
included razing the former Site buildings for the construction of a high-density apartment
building with an associated parking deck known as Hawkins Press. A Required Overall Planting
Plan prepared by Land Design depicting the redevelopment and landscaping plan is provided as
Appendix A.
The proposed final grade soil assessment scope of work is provided in the following sections.
3
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/akridge/akr.005 dunavant
brownfields assessment/final grade/work plan/24025 - crayton printing - fg soil assessment work plan.doc
2.0 Final Grade Assessment Activities
The soil assessment activities described herein will be conducted in general accordance with the
DEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of
Contaminated Sites (Guidelines) dated September 2022, the most recent versions of U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV Laboratory Services and Applied Science
Division (LSASD) Field Branches Quality System and Technical Procedures guidance, and the
DEQ Brownfields Minimum Requirements Checklist for Site Assessment Work Plans and
Reports dated March 2023.
The purpose of the final grade soil assessment activities is to evaluate potential direct exposure
risks to future Site occupants and workers from shallow soil in landscaped areas at the Site. A
description of the final grade soil assessment activities is provided in the following sections.
2.1 Final Grade Soil Sampling Activities
Based on review of the Required Overall Planting Plan, observations at the Site, and
communications with the PD, landscaped areas at the Site have been identified and divided into
four (4) final grade evaluation areas (FG-1 through FG-4). To evaluate soil within each final
grade evaluation area, five (5) shallow soil borings will be advanced in each area for the
collection of aliquot soil samples. The final grade evaluation areas and approximate locations of
the aliquot soil boring locations are shown in Figure 3.
Aliquot soil borings will be advanced from the surface to approximately two (2) feet below
ground surface (ft bgs) using a decontaminated stainless-steel hand auger. During boring
advancement, continuous soil samples will be collected from the center of the hand auger bucket.
Soil samples will be described for lithologic purposes and observed for obvious evidence of
staining and unusual odors. A portion of the soil sample from each aliquot location will be
allowed to volatilize and will be field screened for the presence of volatile organic vapors using a
calibrated photoionization detector (PID).
4
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/akridge/akr.005 dunavant
brownfields assessment/final grade/work plan/24025 - crayton printing - fg soil assessment work plan.doc
Remaining portions of the aliquot soil samples will be homogenized to form a composite soil
sample representative of shallow soil in each evaluation area. Composite soil samples will be
submitted for laboratory analysis of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method
8270 and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals plus hexavalent chromium
by EPA Methods 6020/7471/7199.
Based on results of field screening, a grab soil sample from an undisturbed portion of the aliquot
location exhibiting the highest likelihood for impact will be collected from each of the final
grade evaluation areas and will be submitted for laboratory analysis of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260. If field screening results do not identify the obvious
presence of impacts in an aliquot soil sample within an evaluation area, the final grade evaluation
area grab sample will be collected from the 1 to 2 ft bgs sample interval from a randomly
selected aliquot soil boring in each evaluation area.
Soil samples selected for laboratory analysis will be collected directly into laboratory supplied
glassware; labeled with the sample identification, date, and requested analysis; and placed in a
laboratory supplied cooler with ice. The sample cooler will be submitted to a North Carolina
certified laboratory under standard chain of custody protocols. A final grade soil sample
summary is provided as Table 1.
Following sampling activities, the soil borings will be abandoned and the surfaces will be
repaired similar to pre-drilling conditions. In addition, the soil sample locations will be
estimated using a hand-held global positioning system (GPS) unit.
2.2 Quality Assurance / Quality Control
Non-dedicated equipment and tools will be decontaminated prior to use at each boring location.
To evaluate the reproducibility of the sample results, H&H will collect one (1) duplicate soil
sample as part of the final grade sampling. The duplicate sample will be submitted for the same
analyses as the parent soil sample.
5
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/akridge/akr.005 dunavant
brownfields assessment/final grade/work plan/24025 - crayton printing - fg soil assessment work plan.doc
Laboratory quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) procedures will be employed to ensure
appropriate sample handling and analysis and to aid in the review and validation of the analytical
data. QA/QC procedures will be conducted in accordance with the method protocols and will
include regular equipment maintenance, equipment calibration, and adherence to specific sample
custody and data management procedures.
Samples will be analyzed in conjunction with appropriate blanks, laboratory duplicates,
continuing calibration standards, surrogate standards, and matrix spiking standards in accordance
with approved methodologies to monitor both instrument and analyst performance. H&H will
request that laboratory method detection limits for each analyte be at or below the DEQ
Residential Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs), where possible. Additionally, H&H
will request that the laboratory include estimated concentrations for compounds that are detected
at levels above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit
(J flags).
The laboratory analytical data report and QA package for the final grade soil samples submitted
to and analyzed by the subcontracted laboratory will be provided in an appendix to the final
report. Laboratory QA data consistent with Level II documentation will be requested for this
project. A copy of the completed chain-of-custody record and shipping receipt will be appended
to the corresponding laboratory analytical report and will be included with the final report.
2.3 Investigation Derived Waste
Based on results of previous soil assessment completed at the Site, investigation derived waste
(IDW) generated during the assessment activities will be thin spread on-Site. However, if
significant impacts are suspected based on field screening results (i.e., presence of free product,
etc.), the soil cuttings will be containerized in 55-gallon drums and staged on-Site pending
analytical results of a composite IDW sample. Based on laboratory analytical results of IDW
sample (if collected), the IDW will be managed in general accordance with DEQ IHSB 15A
NCAC 02T.1503 and 15A NCAC 02H. 0106 rules.
6
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/akridge/akr.005 dunavant
brownfields assessment/final grade/work plan/24025 - crayton printing - fg soil assessment work plan.doc
3.0 Reporting
Following completion of the assessment activities and receipt of the laboratory analytical data,
H&H will prepare a Final Grade Soil Assessment Report. The report will include a description
of field activities, field screening results, a tabular summary of the analytical results in
comparison to regulatory screening levels, risk calculations, boring logs in tabular form (will
include boring IDs, field screening/PID results, and soil descriptions), figures depicting the
sample locations, laboratory analytical reports and chain of custody records, a discussion of
QA/QC data, and conclusions and recommendations based upon our assessment activities. The
report will be sealed by a North Carolina Professional Engineer (PE) or Professional Geologist
(PG) and the firm PE/PG numbers will be provided.
Table
Table 1
Proposed Final Grade Soil Sample Summary
Crayton Printing
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AKR-005
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/akridge/akr.005
dunavant brownfields assessment/final grade/table/table 1 - sample summary.docx
Sample ID Sample Objective
Aliquot
Soil
Borings
Aliquot
Boring
Depth
ft b s
Grab
VOC Samples
(8260)
Composite SVOC
Samples
(8270)
Composite RCRA
Metals + Hexavalent
Chromium Samples
6020/7471/7199
FG-1
Shallow Soil Exposure
Risk
5 2 1 1 1
FG-2 5 2 1 1 1
FG-3 5 2 1 1 1
FG-4 5 2 1 1 1
FG-DUP QA/QC 5 2 1 1 1
Notes:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency analytical method is shown in parentheses.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-VOCs; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
ft bgs = feet below ground surface; QA/QC = quality assurance/quality control
The duplicate sample location will be selected in the field.
Figures
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP ElevationProgram, Geographic Names Information System, National HydrographyDataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, andNational Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. CensusBureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S.Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA NationalCenters for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal Relief Model. Datarefreshed April, 2023.
SITE LOCATION MAP
CRAYTON PRINTINGDISTRIBUTION STREET AND DUNAVANT STREETCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: 8-24-23
JOB NO: AKR-005
REVISION NO: 0
FIGURE NO: 1
2923 South Tryon Street - Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
TITLE
PROJECT
0 2,000 4,000
SCALE IN FEET
SITE
Path: S:\AAA-Master Projects\Akridge\AKR.005 Dunavant Brownfields Assessment\Final Grade\Figures\Figure-1.mxd
N
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
CHARLOTTE WEST, NORTH CAROLINA 2022CHARLOTTE EAST, NORTH CAROLINA 2022
QUADRANGLE7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. AKR-005
DATE: 8-23-23
FIGURE NO. 2
CRAYTON PRINTING
DISTRIBUTION STREET AND DUNAVANT STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
BUILDING FOOTPRINT - LEVEL 1
BUILDING FOOTPRINT - LEVEL 2
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
DIS
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
DU
N
A
V
A
N
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
DUN
A
V
A
N
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
HAW
K
I
N
S
S
T
R
E
E
T
PARKING DECK
AREA B
AREA C
POOL/
COURTYARD
LEGEND
1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS 2023.
2. BUILDING OVERLAY BASED ON REQUIRED PLANTING
PLAN PREPARED BY LANDDESIGN AND DATED 8/17/21.
HUB SOUTH END APARTMENTS
(2250 HAWKINS STREET)
MULTI-TENANT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING
(2326 DISTRIBUTION STREET)
MULTI-TENANT
COMMERCIAL BUILDING
(2401 DISTRIBUTION STREET)
VACANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING
(2322 DUNAVANT STREET)
JUNCTION 1504
LUXURY APARTMENTS
(1504 MAINLINE BOULEVARD)
MERV PLACE
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
S:
\
A
A
A
-
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
k
r
i
d
g
e
\
A
K
R
.
0
0
5
D
u
n
a
v
a
n
t
B
r
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d
s
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
\
F
i
n
a
l
G
r
a
d
e
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
A
K
R
.
0
0
5
_
2
0
2
3
0
8
2
3
.
d
w
g
,
F
I
G
2
,
9
/
6
/
2
0
2
3
8
:
3
7
:
0
0
A
M
,
s
h
a
y
n
e
s
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. AKR-005
DATE: 8-23-23
FIGURE NO. 3
CRAYTON PRINTING
DISTRIBUTION STREET AND DUNAVANT STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
PROPOSED FINAL GRADE
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
BUILDING FOOTPRINT - LEVEL 1
BUILDING FOOTPRINT - LEVEL 2
PROPOSED LANDSCAPED AREA
PAVED AREA
PROPOSED SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
DIS
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
DUN
A
V
A
N
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
DUN
A
V
A
N
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
HAW
K
I
N
S
S
T
R
E
E
T
PARKING DECK
FG-1C
FG-1B
FG-1A
FG-1D
FG-1E
LEGEND
1. DEVELOPMENT PLANS PROVIDED BY BB+M, DATED
2-19-2020.
FG-2A
FG-2B
FG-2C
FG-2D
FG-2E
FG-3B
FG-3C
FG-3D
FG-3E
FG-3A
FG-4A
FG-4B
FG-4C
FG-4D
FG-4E
S:
\
A
A
A
-
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
k
r
i
d
g
e
\
A
K
R
.
0
0
5
D
u
n
a
v
a
n
t
B
r
o
w
n
f
i
e
l
d
s
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
\
F
i
n
a
l
G
r
a
d
e
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
A
K
R
.
0
0
5
_
2
0
2
3
0
8
2
3
.
d
w
g
,
F
I
G
3
,
9
/
1
1
/
2
0
23
2
:
3
1
:
2
1
P
M
,
s
h
a
y
n
e
s
&2857<$5'
322/
Appendix A
Required Overall Planting Plan
PRCE
PRCE
PRCE
PRCE
PRCE
PRCE
LIQR
LIQR
LIQR
ACEA
ACEA
ACEA
PISK
PISK
PISK
PISK
PISK
CAR CAR
CAR CAR
CAR CAR
CAR CAR
CAR CAR
CAR CAR
CAR CAR
CAR CAR
PRUO
AME ARB
AME ARB
AME ARB
AME ARB
AME ARB
AME ARB
AME ARB
AME ARB
AME ARB
AME ARB
AME ARB
CAR CAR
CAR CAR
CAR CAR
MECH.PRVT. STOR.ELEC./ DATA
MECH.
JR 1BR JR JR JR JR 1BR 2BR
2BR1BRS
1BR-IC
1BRD-IC
1BRD-IC
1BR-IC
2BR ALT-B
1BRS ALT-CJR
1BRS
1BRS
2BR- ALT D
1BRD-IC
1BR-IC2BR1BR-IC
1BRD-IC
1BRS
2BR-ALT D
1BRS
1BRD-IC
?
1BR
JR
732' - 3"
732' - 3"
DN
5.
2
1
%
LEASING/ LOUNGE
RESIDENT STORAGE
RISER
MECH VENT
MECH. VENT
MECH.
717' - 9"
DOG WASH TRASH ROOM
1BRS
2BR
1BRD ALT-A
1BRD-ALT A
1BRD-ALT A
ELEC.
1BR
2BRD ALT-A
1BRS
MAINTENANCE
BIKE STORAGE
ELEC.
ELEV LOBBY
MECH. VENT
719' - 9"
719' - 9"
719' - 9"
717' - 3 3/4"
717' - 9"
717' - 9 1/8"
718' - 9 3/8"
720' - 0 3/8"
720' - 3"
714' - 6"
714' - 6"
714' - 6"
714' - 6"714' - 6"
719' - 9"
719' - 9"
719' - 9"
719' - 9"
720' - 3"
720' - 3"
720' - 3"
721' - 3"721' - 3"
720' - 3"
720' - 3"
714' - 7"
712' - 9"
716' - 0"
MECH.PRVT. STOR.ELEC./ DATA
MECH.
JR 1BR JR JR JR JR 1BR 2BR
2BR1BRS
1BR-IC
1BRD-IC
1BRD-IC
1BR-IC
2BR ALT-B
1BRS ALT-CJR
1BRS
1BRS
2BR- ALT D
1BRD-IC
1BR-IC2BR1BR-IC
1BRD-IC
1BRS
2BR-ALT D
1BRS
1BRD-IC
?
1BR
JR
732' - 3"
732' - 3"
DN
5.
2
1
%
LEASING/ LOUNGE
RESIDENT STORAGE
RISER
MECH VENT
MECH. VENT
MECH.
717' - 9"
DOG WASH TRASH ROOM
1BRS
2BR
1BRD ALT-A
1BRD-ALT A
1BRD-ALT A
ELEC.
1BR
2BRD ALT-A
1BRS
MAINTENANCE
BIKE STORAGE
ELEC.
ELEV LOBBY
MECH. VENT
719' - 9"
719' - 9"
719' - 9"
717' - 3 3/4"
717' - 9"
717' - 9 1/8"
718' - 9 3/8"
720' - 0 3/8"
720' - 3"
714' - 6"
714' - 6"
714' - 6"
714' - 6"714' - 6"
719' - 9"
719' - 9"
719' - 9"
719' - 9"
720' - 3"
720' - 3"
720' - 3"
721' - 3"721' - 3"
720' - 3"
720' - 3"
714' - 7"
712' - 9"
716' - 0"
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE
SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE
SUE
SUE SUE SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
SUE
T
T
T
DUNAVAN
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
(PUBLIC R
/
W
)
DU
N
A
V
A
N
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
(P
U
B
L
I
C
R
/
W
)
DI
S
T
R
I
B
U
T
I
O
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
(P
U
B
L
I
C
R
/
W
)
HA
W
K
I
N
S
S
T
R
E
E
T
(5
0
'
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
/
W
)
16' SETBA
C
K
FROM BO
C
16
'
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
FR
O
M
B
O
C
20
'
B
U
I
L
D
-
T
O
-
Z
O
N
E
FR
O
M
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
16
'
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
FR
O
M
B
O
C
20
'
B
U
I
L
D
-
T
O
-
Z
O
N
E
FR
O
M
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
20' BUILD
-
T
O
-
Z
O
N
E
FROM SE
T
B
A
C
K
PARKING DECK
POOL
(BY POOL
DESIGNER)
8' AMEN
I
T
Y
Z
O
N
E
8'
A
M
E
N
I
T
Y
Z
O
N
E
8'
A
M
E
N
I
T
Y
Z
O
N
E
OVERHEAD STRUCTURE,
REFER TO LAYOUT AND
MATERIALS PLAN THIS SET.
OVERHEAD STRUCTURE,
REFER TO LAYOUT AND
MATERIALS PLAN THIS SET.
EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED
11.5" OAK
EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED
5.5" CREPE MYRTLE
TRANSFORMER
TRANSFORMER
TRANSFORMER
PROP. 10' X 10' SIGHT TRIANGLE
PROP. 10' X 10' SIGHT TRIANGLE
PROP. 35' x 35' SIGHT TRIANGLE
EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED
5" CREPE MYRTLE
EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED5.5" CREPE MYRTLE
EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED 6"
CREPE MYRTLE
EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED 6"
OAK
EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED
7.5" OAK
EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED
10" OAK
COURTYARD ON GRADE.
274 SF PA PROVIDED MIN.
COURTYARD ON GRADE.
274 SF PA PROVIDED MIN.
LIMIT OF SUSPENDED SLAB
TO REACH 274 SF AREA
COURTYARD ON GRADE.
274 SF PA PROVIDED MIN.
9 SMALL MATURING TREES
9 X 200 SF = 1800SF SOIL
PROVIDED: 1800 SF
AREA OF SUSPENDED SLAB2 SMALL MATURING TREES
2 X 200 SF = 400 SF SOIL
PROVIDED: 415 SF
9 SMALL MATURING TREES
2 X 200 SF = 400 SF SOIL
PROVIDED: 400 SF
9 LARGE MATURING TREES9 X 274 SF = 2466 SF SOIL
PROVIDED: 2450 SF
AREA OF SUSPENDED SLAB
3 SMALL MATURING TREES
3 X 200 SF = 600 SF SOIL
PROVIDED: 680 SF
AREA OF SUSPENDED SLAB
2 SMALL MATURING TREES
2 X 200 SF = 400 SF SOILPROVIDED: 400 SF
LIGHTING SHOW FOR REFERENCE
ONLY. REFER TO ELECTRICAL
PLANS FOR LIGHTING
SPECIFICATIONS
LIGHTING SHOW FOR
REFERENCE ONLY. REFERTO ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR
LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS
LIGHTING SHOW FOR
REFERENCE ONLY. REFER
TO ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR
LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS
SCREENING FENCE FOR
TRANSFORMER- REFERTO SITE DETAILS
TRANSFORMER MASONRY SCREENINGWALL BY ARCHITECTS. REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS
TRANSFORMER MASONRY SCREENINGWALL BY ARCHITECTS. REFER TO
ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS
TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME MIN. CONT.MIN. CAL.MIN. HT.REMARKS
ACEA 3 ACER BUERGERIANUM `AERYN`AERYN TRIDENT MAPLE B&B 3"14-16`
AME ARB 11 AMELANCHIER ARBOREA DOWNY SERVICEBERRY B&B 2"8-10`
CAR CAR 11 CARPINUS CAROLINIANA AMERICAN HORNBEAM B&B 3"14-16`
LIQR 3 LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA `ROTUNDILOBA`FRUITLESS SWEET GUM B&B 3"14-16`
PISK 5 PISTACIA CHINENSIS `KEITH DAVEY`KEITH DAVEY CHINESE PISTACHE B&B 3"14-16`
PRCE 6 PRUNUS CERASIFERA `ATROPURPUREA`PURPLELEAF PLUM B&B 2"8-10`
PRUO 1 PRUNUS X `OKAME`OKAME FLOWERING CHERRY B&B 3"14-16`
ACEA
AME ARB
CAR CAR
LIQR
PISK
PRCE
PRUO
PLANT SCHEDULE
HAWKINS PRESS
KA D&D HOLDINGS LLC
2300 DUNAVANT STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC
1020014
REQUIRED PLANTING PLAN
N/A
XX
XX
XX
C9-00
9/13/2021 11:02 AM CASSIDY FRANKLIN \\CHFILES\PROJECTS\_2020\1020014\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\1020014_PLN_RPLNT.DWG
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42"
VERT:
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
#
SEAL
08/17/2021
1 12.23.2020LAND DEVELOPMENT
SUBMITTAL 1
2 03.29.2021LAND DEVELOPMENT
SUBMITTAL 2
3 05.24.2021LAND DEVELOPMENT
SUBMITTAL 3
4 08.17.2021LAND DEVELOPMENT
SUBMITTAL 4
----
1" = 20'
4020010
INTERNAL PLANTING REQUIREMENT (SEC. 21-96 F)
INTERNAL TREES REQUIRED
1 LARGE MATURING SHADE TREE PER
10,000 SF IMPERVIOUS AREA
11 LARGE MATURING SHADE TREES REQUIRED
12 LARGE MATURING SHADE TREES PROVIDED
11,220 SF PLANTING AREA REQUIRED
15,900 SF PLANTING AREA PROVIDED
PERIMETER PLANTING REQUIREMENT (SEC. 21-96 E)
STREET TREES REQUIRED
DUNAVANT STREET: +/- 620 LF*
16 LARGE MATURING SHADE TREES EVERY 40' REQUIRED
11 LARGE MATURING SHADE TREES PROVIDED
6 SMALL MATURING SHADE TREES PROVIDED AT OHE
LOCATIONS*
TREE SAVE AREA + ROW MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS:
TOD DISTRICTS EXEMPT FROM TREE SAVE
BUFFER REQUIREMENTS
PLANTING AREA EQUAL TO 10% OF
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: +- 2.5 AC (+-109,526 SF)
*OVERHEAD POWER LINES REQUIRE SMALL MATURING TREES EVERY 30' IN CERTAIN LOCATIONS
DISTRIBUTION STREET: +/- 340 LF*
N/A
SCREENING REQUIREMENTS (SEC. 15.9.K)
SCREEN FROM ABUTTING PROPERTY AND FROM PUBLIC VIEW FROM PUBLIC STREET:
-PARKING W/ LOTS W/ 10+ SPACES
-DUMPSTERS AND RECYCLING
-OUTDOOR STORAGE
-UTILITY STRUCTURES
-BACKFLOW PREVENTERS
SHRUBS REQUIRED: 3' HT. MIN AND 3' O.C. MAX
NATIVE SPECIES REQUIREMENT (SEC. 21-96 C)
REQUIREMENT: 50% OF NEW TREES
MUST BE NATIVE SPECIES.
CONTINUOUS PLANTING STRIP; AVG WIDTH 8', 1 LARGE TREE PER 40'
OR 1 SMALL TREE PER 30' PER STREET FRONTAGE, 2” CAL. MIN.
20 NATIVE TREES REQUIRED
40 TOTAL NEW TREES PROVIDED
22 NATIVE TREES PROVIDED (55%)
PLANTING TABULATION:
11 SMALL MATURING SHADE TREES EVERY 30' REQUIRED
11 SMALL MATURING TREES PROVIDED
NOTES:
WALK SITE WITH URBAN FORESTER TO VERIFY SMALL VS. LARGE TREE SPECIES BEFORE PURCHASING TREES
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
CODE ENFORCEMENT
The Design In These Construction
Documents Have Been Reviewed For
Compliance With The State Building
Code. It Is The Responsibility Of The
Contractor To Construct This Project
With Good Engineering Practice And
In Compliance With The North
Carolina State Building Code.