Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMO-28375_47627_CA_MRP_20221213
100 East Ruffin Street, Mebane, North Carolina 27302
Telephone (919) 563-9091 ·Facsimile (919) 563-9095
www.terraquestpc.com
MONITORING REPORT
(December 1, 2022 sampling event)
BARKER’S GROCERY-2
104 HOUPE ROAD
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC, 28625-9501
Latitude: 35.84112° N Longitude: -80.86818° W
Release Information:
Date Discovered: January 6, 2021 (Laboratory Confirmation)
Estimated Release Quantity: Unknown
Release Cause/Source: Commercial Underground Storage Tank System
Facility ID No.: 0-027378
NCDWM-UST Incident No.: 47627 (8489 closed via NFA)
UST Capacities:
1990 closure: (1) 2,000-gallon diesel, (1) 560-gallon kerosene, (1) 1,000-gallon, (1) 1,065-gallon,
and (1) 2,000-gallon gasoline
2020 closure: (1) 4,000-gallon diesel, (1) 2,000-gallon kerosene, (3) 8,000-gallon gasoline
Responsible Party: Property Owners:
Beroth Oil Company Don & Sue Barker
P.O. Box 4089 131 Dunlap Loop
Winston-Salem, NC 27150 Statesville, NC 28625
Terraquest Project No. 09606
December 13, 2022
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 i Statesville, NC
CERTIFICATION FOR THE SUBMITTAL
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL / GEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
Attached is the Monitoring Report for:
Site Name: Barker’s Grocery
Address: 104 Houpe Road
City: Statesville State: NC Zip Code: 28625-9501
Property Owner: Don & Sue Barker
Address: 131 Dunlap Loop
City: Statesville State: NC Zip Code: 28625
I, Michael J. Brown, a Licensed Geologist in the State of North Carolina for TERRAQUEST
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, P.C. do hereby certify that I am familiar with and have
reviewed all material including figures within this report and that to the best of my knowledge
the data, site assessment, figures, and other associated materials are correct and accurate. All
work was performed under my direct supervision. My seal and signature are affixed below.
Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. is licensed to practice geology and engineering in
North Carolina. The geology certification number of the corporation is C-291. The engineering
certification number of the corporation is C-4634. Engineering is practiced out of the Cary, NC
office.
TERRAQUEST ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, P.C.
Ryan D. Kerins Michael J. Brown, P.G.
Project Manager President
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 ii Statesville, NC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................... iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... iv
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION ............................................................................. 1
3.0 SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................ 3
4.0 GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................ 5
5.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................... 6
6.0 LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................................... 6
REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 7
TABLES
1. Site History (UST System Information)
2. Surrounding Property Owners
3. Water Supply Well Information
4. Summary of Soil Sampling Results – 2020 UST Closure
5. Summary of Soil Sampling Results – 7-2021 Risk Assessment
6. Monitoring Well Construction Information
7. Summary of Groundwater Sampling Results
FIGURES
1. Site Location Map
2. Site Vicinity Map
3. Site Layout Map
4. Soil Sample Location Map
5. Potentiometric Surface Map (12/1/22)
6. Groundwater Analytical Results (12/1/22)
APPENDICES
A. Technical Methods/Standard Procedures
B. Groundwater Data
C. Analytical Report
ENVIRONMENTAL ACRONYMS
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 iii Statesville, NC
2L Standard Groundwater Standards Title 15A NCAC 2L
0.0202(g)
2B Standard Surface Water Standards Title 15A NCAC 2B
AFVR Aggressive Fluid-Vapor Recovery
AST Aboveground Storage Tank
BGL Below Ground Level
BTEX Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes
C&D Construction and Demolition
CAP Corrective Action Plan
CAPR Corrective Action Performance Report
CADR Corrective Action Design Report
CSA Comprehensive Site Assessment
DPE Dual-phase Extraction
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ePATA Electronic Pre-Approval Task Authorization
EPH Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
ESA Environmental Site Assessment
GCL Gross Contamination Level
LEL Lower Explosive Limit
LSA Limited Site Assessment
IPE di-Isopropyl Ether
ISCO In-situ Chemical Oxidation
MADEP Massachusetts Department of Environmental
Protection
MDL Method Detection Limit
MNA Monitored Natural Attenuation
MMPE Mobile Multi Phase Extraction
MSCC Maximum Soil Contaminant
Concentration
MSL Mean Sea Level
MSW Municipal Solid Waste
MTBE Methyl tertiary-Butyl Ether
NC North Carolina
NCAC NC Administrative Code
NCDENR NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources
NCDEQ NC Department of Environmental
Quality
NCDOT NC Department of Transportation
NCDWM-SW NC Division of Waste Management’s Solid
Waste Section
NCDWM-UST NC Division of Waste Management’s UST
Section
NCDWQ NC Division of Water Quality
NFA No Further Action
NORR Notice of Regulatory Requirements
NORP Notice of Residual Petroleum
NOV Notice of Violation
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System
OVM Organic Vapor Meter
PID Photoionization Detector
PLC Programmable Logic Controller
POE Point of Entry (water treatment system)
POTW Publicly Owned Treatment Works
RBCA Risk Based Corrective Action
RDL Reporting Detection Limit
RP Responsible Party
SCFM Standard Cubic Feet per Minute
SVE Soil Vapor Extraction
STF Leaking UST State Trust Fund
STG Soil to Groundwater
TA Task Authorization
TCC Target Cleanup Concentrations
Terraquest Terraquest Environmental Consultants,
P.C.
TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon
UST Underground Storage Tank
VOA Volatile Organic Analysis
VOC Volatile Organic Compound
VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons
XP Explosion Proof
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 iv Statesville, NC
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. has performed a groundwater sampling event for the
Barker’s Grocery 2 petroleum UST release incident. The site is in Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina and the work was performed for the responsible party, Beroth Oil Company.
Recent assessment activities have confirmed the absence of GCL violations in the five sampled
wells at the site. With the reported groundwater flow direction and lack of GCL violations,
Terraquest recommends taking steps toward closure for this release incident. The Risk Ranking
should be lowered.
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 1 Statesville, NC
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of the responsible party, Beroth Oil Company, Inc., Terraquest Environmental
Consultants, P.C. performed a groundwater sampling event in December 2022 for the Barkers
Grocery-2 release incident. The site is located in Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina. The
work concerns the release incident discovered during the 12/2020 UST closure, Incident 47627.
A previous release incident (8489) was opened and closed at this site. Activities in this report
were pre-approved on ePATA 8489/47627-038.
Note that this is the second groundwater sampling event since the April 4-8, 2022 Mobile Multi-
Phase Extraction (MMPE) performed to reduce GCL violations as a measure of lowering risk to a
lateral water supply well.
The site location, vicinity, and layout are depicted in Figures 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Terraquest’s
technical methods and standard procedures are detailed in Appendix A.
2.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION
Beroth Oil Company is the owner of two generations of tanks at this site. As shown in Table 1,
the first set of tanks included 1, 2,000-gallon diesel, 1, 560-gallon kerosene, 1, 1,000-gallon
gasoline, 1, 1,056-gallon gasoline, and one 2,000-gallon kerosene. The second generation of
tanks included 1, 4,000-gallon diesel, 1, 2,000-gallon kerosene, and 3, 8,000-gallon gasoline. The
first generation of tanks were closed in 1990 and the second in 2020. Further tank details are
provided in Table 1.
The site is located on Hwy 21 in a rural area north of Statesville, NC. Land use surrounding the
facility is chiefly residential with some businesses located along Turnersburg Highway. All
properties within 1,500 feet of the site are zoned R-20 (residential) according to the Iredell
County website. Surrounding property owner information is provided in Table 2.
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 2 Statesville, NC
A prior release incident (#8489) identified soil contamination but no groundwater contamination
in excess of applicable limits. A Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) remedial system was installed in April
2012 and was active until its shut down in December 2016. Following public notice, the NCWM-
UST issued a No Further Action Letter for the #8489 release incident.
As part of closure activities in December 2020, Terraquest personnel collected samples around
the UST basin and at prescribed locations near product lines and dispensers. The large amount
of pea gravel in the UST basin prevented the collection of soil samples directly beneath the tanks
and a groundwater monitoring well was installed instead. The analytical results of a groundwater
sample collected from that well (MW1), revealed the presence of petroleum-type contaminants
at concentrations exceeding the 2L Standards. The UST Closure Report (UST-12) (January 29,
2021) previously submitted to the NCDWM-UST detailed these activities. Following review of the
UST Closure Report, the NCDWM-UST’s March 19, 2021 Acknowledgement of Report Receipt
correspondence agreed with the conclusions to move forward with risk-ranking activities similar
to an LSA.
Prior work associated with the closed release incident 8489, identified two sole-source potable
wells within a 1,500-foot radius of the site. One of these wells is located within 1,000 feet of the
source area. A production well operated by Iredell County was found at a distance of 1,570 feet
from the source area. This well provides municipal water for the entire surrounding community
not using their own potable wells. Two non-potable use wells were also identified within 1,500
feet of the site. The well locations are shown on Figure 2 and detailed on Table 3.
These wells were confirmed through July 7, 2021 reconnaissance efforts. Terraquest inquired
with the property owner of the potable well located within 1,000 feet of the release area if he
would be interested in connecting to the municipal water supply system. The bare-chested man
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 3 Statesville, NC
quickly closed the door while stating that he was “not interested”. The release incident remains
a High Risk based on this sole-source well use.
As part of the reconnaissance effort, Terraquest also searched for any surface water bodies
within a 500-foot radius of the site. A dried pond basin was noted to the west of the site in the
location shown on Figure 2. The USGS Statesville East and Statesville West quadrangle maps of
the area show the presence of Fifth Creek located to the north. The Iredell County GIS website
shows un-named tributaries to Fifth Creek in the locations shown on Figure 2. The dried pond
observed by Terraquest was confirmed by this website as located to the west of the site.
The site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina. The Piedmont is
characterized by a hummocky terrain with variable topographic relief. The site lies within the
Inner Piedmont Lithotectonic Province of North Carolina, a subdivision of the Appalachian
Piedmont Province. The Inner Piedmont Belt primarily consists of metamorphosed sedimentary
and volcanic rocks of upper Proterozoic to lower Cambrian age. Specifically, the lithology noted
for the site on the Geologic Map of North Carolina consists of gneiss’s and schists that are
inequigranular, have locally abundant potassic feldspar and garnet, are interlayered and
gradational with calc-silicate rock, and sillimanite-mica shist, mica schist, and amphibolite may
be present (Brown, et al., 1985). The lithology has been mapped by Goldsmith, et al. (1988) as
upper Proterozoic - Cambrian biotite gneiss. This unit is composed of thin to thick layered biotite-
quartz-feldspar gneiss with local layers of mica schist. The encountered lithology at the site was
a silt (ML) from the surface to a depth of 45 feet below ground level (BGL). The silt was logged
as soft, brown/dark brown/orange/maroon/tan, with varying amounts of mica.
3.0 SOIL QUALITY ASSESSMENT
During the December 2020 UST closure, Soil samples were collected every ten feet along the
product lines and beneath each of the four dispensers. The product line samples were collected
5 feet BGL and the dispenser samples at 3 feet BGL. The tanks were bed in such a large volume
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 4 Statesville, NC
of pea gravel that native soil was not encountered by the excavator performing removal. The
prior removal of tanks was likely the reason that so much pea gravel was present during the
current work. Without removing all of the pea gravel, which fills in each scoop removed, it was
not possible to reasonably reach native soil. Additional support via shoring was required to
prevent undermining of the excavated area and possible structural damage to the onsite building
and was outside the scope of this project.
The dispenser and product line samples were collected from the track-hoe bucket and
groundwater samples from a new, disposable bailer. All samples were collected by Terraquest
personnel donning new disposable nitrile gloves. Samples were then placed into laboratory
containers, preserved with acid as required and packed on ice pending onsite lab analysis. Chain-
of-custody documentation was maintained for each sample. All UST closure soil samples were
analyzed utilizing UVF technology targeting TPH GRO and DRO. Those results reported no TPH
Action Level exceedances in any sample. Sample IDs, depths, dates, and analytical results are
listed in Table 4 and the locations are provided on Figure 4.
As part of additional risk assessment activities, Terraquest personnel supervised the collection of
soil samples as close to the bottom of the tank basin as possible on July 7, 2021. Following utility
location by a private locator, a soil boring, B1, was advanced at the location shown on Figure 4.
A sample could not be collected from directly beneath the UST basin as it was filled with pea
gravel to an unknown depth. The boring location was away from septic lines and other utilities
in the area. A NC-licensed driller advanced the boring using a Geoprobe 7822 drilling unit. Soil
samples were collected from beneath the location of the former USTs in intervals until the water
table was reached. The exact intervals were from 20-23 feet BGL and from 30-33 feet BGL. An
additional sample was collected within the water table from 37-40 feet BGL. The samples were
placed into the appropriate laboratory-supplied containers, labeled, packed on ice, and
transported to an NC-certified lab for analysis per 8260 and MADEP VPH.
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 5 Statesville, NC
The analytical results reveal the presence of petroleum-type contaminants, however, neither of
the vadose zone soil samples, 20-23’ and 30-33’, had reported concentrations in excess of the
soil-to-groundwater maximum soil contaminant concentrations (STG MSCCs). The analytical
results are summarized in Table 5.
4.0 GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
Prior to purging and sampling the monitoring well network on December 1, 2022, Terraquest
personnel first measured the depth-to-water in each well. Those measurements were used in
conjunction with surveyed top of casing elevations to determine the direction of groundwater
flow. Figure 5 was generated to show the potentiometric surface which is decreasing to the
east/northeast. Groundwater elevation data is summarized in Table 6. Historical groundwater
data is shown in Appendix B that reveals that, on average, the water table has dropped by over
four feet since last measured in June 2022.
On December 1, 2022, Terraquest personnel collected groundwater samples from monitoring
wells TQMW1-TQMW5. Prior to sampling, each well was purged of at least three well volumes
of water using a new disposable bailer. Bailers were then used to retrieve a representative
groundwater sample from each well. Upon retrieval, the samples were placed into the
appropriate laboratory-prepared sample containers, labeled, and packed on ice pending
shipment to a North Carolina-certified laboratory for analysis. All the collected groundwater
samples were submitted for analysis per 6200B for VOC’s.
The groundwater results from the December 1, 2022 sampling event reveal no GCL violations.
Note that the April 2022 MMPE event was previously performed with that goal in mind and was
backed up with the June 2022 and now December 2022 data showing a stable plume. While 2L
Standard violations remain, they are below the GCLs and are located in an upgradient and lateral
direction from the sole active water supply well ranking this site a High Risk.
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 6 Statesville, NC
Groundwater analytical results are summarized on Figure 6 and detailed on Table 7. Historical
groundwater data is shown in Appendix B. The full analytical report is provided in Appendix C.
There is no GCL plume reported. The 2L Standard violation plume covers an area of 6,600 square
feet. That is a reduction from the 8,700 square feet reported for the previous October 2021
sampling event and is the same size and shape as the June 2022 plume. The plume is stable with
many contaminants reducing in concentration.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
Recent assessment activities have confirmed the absence of GCL violations in the five sampled
wells at the site. With the reported groundwater flow direction and lack of GCL violations, As
this is the second event confirming the absence of GCL violations and stability of the plume,
Terraquest recommends moving this release incident toward closure.
6.0 LIMITATIONS
This report is limited to the investigation of petroleum hydrocarbons only and does not imply
that other unforeseen adverse impacts to the environment are not present at the facility. In
addition, subsurface heterogeneities not identified during the current study may influence the
migration of groundwater or contaminants in unpredicted ways. The limited amount of sampling
and testing conducted during this study cannot practically reveal all subsurface heterogeneities.
Furthermore, the subsurface conditions, particularly groundwater flow, elevation, and water
quality may very through time. The opinions and conclusions arrived at in this report are in
accordance with industry-accepted geologic and hydrogeologic practices at this time and
location. No warranty is implied or intended.
Monitoring Report (12/1/22) Beroth Oil Company, Inc. Prepared by: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, P.C. (#47627) Barker’s Grocery-2
Report Prepared: December 13, 2022 7 Statesville, NC
REFERENCES
Brown, et al, 1985, Geologic Map of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources and Community Development, 1:500,000 scale.
Goldsmith, R., D.J. Milton, and J.W. Horton, Jr. 1988. Geologic Map of the Charlotte 1o x 2o
Quadrangle, North Carolina and South Carolina. USGS Miscellaneous Investigations Series
Map I-1251-E.
TABLES
Table 1
Date: 12/13/22 Facility ID No. 0-027378
UST Product Capacity (gallons)Date Installed Date Closed Release Discovered?
A1 Diesel 4,000 7/1/1990 12/2/20 NO
A2 Kerosene 2,000 7/1/1990 12/2/20 NO
A3 Gasoline 8,000 7/1/1990 12/2/20 YES
A4 Gasoline 8,000 7/1/1990 12/2/20 YES
A5 Gasoline 8,000 6/8/1990 12/2/20 YES
1 Diesel 2,000 1/1/1964 6/8/1990 NO
2 Kerosene 560 1/1/1964 6/8/1990 YES
3 Gasoline 1,000 1/1/1964 6/8/1990 NO
4 Gasoline 1,056 1/1/1964 6/8/1990 NO
5 Gasoline 2,000 1/1/1964 1/1/1990 NO
Notes:
1. Information obtained from NC UST Database.
2. Refer to Figure 3 for the locations of the former USTs.
Incident Name: Barkers Grocery Incident No. 47627 (8489 closed via NFA)
SITE HISTORY (UST SYSTEM INFORMATION)
Facility ID No. 0-027378
Property Owner Property Owner Address Property Address
William Nicholson, et al 449 Bell Farm Rd Strawberry Lane
Statesville, NC 28677 Statesville, NC 28625Priscilla Nicholson 869 Blackwelder Rd 698 Turnersburg HwyStatesville, NC 28625 Statesville, NC 28625-9457Judy S Hooks 125 Mann Rd 120 Houpe RdHarmony, NC 28634 Statesville, NC 28625
Pamela Cloar 126 Houpe Rd 126 Houpe Rd
Statesville, NC 28625 Statesville, NC 28625Shannon O'Neill 134 Houpe Rd 134 Houpe RdStatesville, NC 28625 Statesville, NC 28625Lowell E Harmon 747 Turnersburg Hwy 747 Turnersburg HwyStatesville, NC 28625 Statesville, NC 28625
Iredell County Farm Bureau Inc 727 Turnersburg Hwy 719 Turnersburg Hwy
Statesville, NC 28625 Statesville, NC 28625
Robert Taylor and Michael Barker 115 Mattie Ln 104 Houpe RoadStatesville, NC 28625 Statesville, NC 28625Notes:
1. Information gathered from Iredell County GIS online system.
2. BOLD portion of tax PIN numbers correspond with those displayed on Figure 2.
Table 2Date: 12/13/22
Tax Account Number
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERSIncident Name: Barkers Grocery Incident No. 8489
4746665231
4746663063
4746661717
4746660580
4746660676
4746676347
4746564290 SITE
4746665635
Table 3Date: 12/13/22 Facility ID No. 0-027378
Well Depth Casing Depth Screen Interval Distance from SourceWell ID No. Well Owner/Address Well Address Phone No.Well Use (feet BGS)Type of Well (feet BGS)(feet BGS) Area of Release (feet)Tommy Dennison 690 Turnersburg Highway Primary Potable Source1Statesville, NC NA "not interested" in NA NA NA NA 465connecting to city waterGeorge Chambers, et. al.115 Sharon Crest Dr2Statesville, NC NA Primary Potable Source NA NA NA NA 1,125
Russell and Sue Flewelling 105 Strawberry Lane
3 Statesville, NC NA Inactive NA NA NA NA 450
Martha Harmon 119 Strawberry Lane4Statesville, NC NA Inactive 39 NA NA NA 655
Tiffany Fox 694 Turnersburg Highway4Statesville, NC NA Inactive NA NA NA NA 370
Iredell Water Corp.482 Nixon Road drilled5Statesville, NC (704) 878-3562 Public Water Supply 245 installed 1977 8" to 31'NA 1,570(450 gallon/minute)Notes:1. "BGS" = below ground surface, "NA" = not available.2. Information obtained from returned survey form. 3. Well ID number is displayed on Figure 2. .
WATER SUPPLY WELL INFORMATIONIncident Name: Barkers Grocery Incident No. 47627 (8489 closed via NFA)
Table 4
Date: 12/13/22 Facility ID No. 0-027378
Ph
o
t
o
i
o
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
(
P
I
D
)
TP
H
5
0
3
0
TP
H
3
5
5
0
Sample ID
6.24
1.04 10.64
8.18
4.56 3.72
1.8 3.92
2.88 0.28
1.92 0.28
2.78 0.34
2.68 0.54
1.32 2.1
15.68
2.4
1 0.72
Bold denotes a compound detection.
Analytical Method
Contaminant of Concern
Facility ID No. 0-027378
82
6
0
82
6
0
82
6
0
82
6
0
82
6
0
82
6
0
82
6
0
82
6
0
82
6
0
82
6
0
82
6
0
MA
D
E
P
V
P
H
MA
D
E
P
V
P
H
MA
D
E
P
V
P
H
0.00197 < 0.00110 < 0.000671 < 0.00209 < 0.00110 < 0.000605 0.152 0.027 0.0143 0.167 < 0.0814 <3.98 < 2.06 < 1.11
0.00269 0.00182 < 0.000671 < 0.00209 < 0.00110 0.000868 0.277 0.0263 0.0207 0.34 < 0.0815 < 3.57 < 1.85 < 0.992
0.0123*0.00773 < 0.000635 0.00237 < 0.00104 0.002 0.195 0.0273 0.0193 0.275 < 0.0771 < 4.13 < 2.14 < 1.15
Bold denotes a compound detection.
Sample ID
Table 6
Date: 12/13/22 Facility ID No. 0-021926
Well ID Date Installed
Date Water
Level
Well Casing
Depth (ft.
Interval (x
to y ft.
Bottom of
Well (ft.
Casing
Elevation Top of
Product
Thickness
Table 7
Date: 12/13/22
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
Sample ID
1,610 363 19 928 17.3 233 60.8 32.2 111 < 14.0 266 < 5.30 < 30.0 < 7.60 < 6.90 < 7.10 < 7.00 < 6.302,600 3,010 385 3,260 14.5 169 579 172 < 52.0 < 28.0 < 200 19.9 174 22.6 49.6 < 14.2 < 14.0 < 12.6
2.92 3.32 8.15 60.8 < 0.220 0.22 25.8 56.8 < 2.60 1.77 < 10.0 3.13 49.9 < 0.760 2.65 2.91 1.5 2.81
Bold denotes a detection
Analytical Method
FIGURES
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
,
P
.
C
.
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
,
P
.
C
.
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
,
P
.
C
.
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
,
P
.
C
.
APPENDIX A
Page 1 of 8
TECHNICAL METHODS/STANDARD PROCEDURES
Equipment Decontamination
All soil sampling equipment utilized during site assessment activities is decontaminated according
to standard and accepted protocol. Cleaning solutions range from clean potable water to acidic
solutions or organic solvents depending on the contaminants present at the site. Equipment
utilized at sites, such as hand augers, contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons, is generally
decontaminated with a low‐sudsing detergent such as Luiquinox® and triple rinsed with distilled
water. Larger equipment, such as drill rigs and associated tools, is steam cleaned. All
decontamination procedures are completed within an established decontamination area which is
located away from the active study area. Frequency of equipment decontamination depends on
the nature of work being performed, but in no case is decontamination performed less frequently
than once per test (i.e., soil boring, well installation, sample collection, etc.). Equipment blanks are
collected as a quality control measure when required by job specifications.
Soil Boring Installation
Soil borings are completed using hand‐operated sampling tools, truck‐mounted drills, or
Geoprobe® drilling rigs depending on the depth of sample collection and other site‐specific
conditions. Hand operated stainless‐steel bucket augers are utilized to collect soil samples at
regular intervals to determine site stratigraphy and to test for the presence of volatile organic
compounds. Samples retrieved from the hand auger are necessarily disturbed during the augering
process, but can provide accurate information on soil type and contaminant concentrations when
properly interpreted. Soil samples from hand augered borings are generally retrieved at one to
two foot intervals.
Truck‐mounted or Geoprobe® drilling equipment is often utilized when sample retrieval depths
exceed twenty feet or subsurface conditions prevent utilization of hand augers (i.e., buried rocks,
wood, bricks or other materials occur in the subsurface). Truck‐mounted drilling rigs usually
retrieve soil via a hollow‐stem auger/split spoon collection method. Geoprobe® rigs usually employ
a Macro‐Core® tube retrieval system.
Hollow stem augers provide relatively undisturbed 2‐foot cores of soil samples. Soil samples are
generally collected at five foot intervals utilizing standard penetration test procedures as defined
by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or are pushed to the desired depth using
the head of the drill rig. The standard penetration test involves driving a 2" outside diameter by 1‐
3/8" inside diameter split‐spoon sampler a minimum distance of one foot with a 340‐lb. slide
hammer falling a distance of 30 inches.
A Geoprobe® rig is a hydraulically‐powered soil probing machine. The probe utilizes static force
and percussion to advance a small diameter sampling device into the subsurface. The sampling
apparatus provides relatively undisturbed 5‐foot cores of soil samples. Soil samples are collected
Page 2 of 8
continuously. The Macro‐Core® tube contains an inserted poly‐vinyl chloride (PVC) liner which
retains the soil sample as the tube is driven into the ground. The Macro‐Core® tube is
decontaminated between each 5‐foot sample interval in a soil boring using a Liquinox and tap‐
water mixture. A new PVC liner is used to collect soil from each sample interval in a soil boring.
Soil samples retrieved from the hollow‐stem augers or Geoprobe are then carefully described
according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Soil descriptions are recorded on a soil
boring log.
Soil Sampling
Soils to be analyzed by a North Carolina‐certified laboratory are prepared according to the specified
analytical method. Initially, soil samples are removed from the ground using either a hand auger,
backhoe bucket, spilt spoon auger, or a Macro‐Core® sampling tube. During the removal, care is
taken to keep the disturbance of the soil structure to a minimum to reduce the loss of
contaminants. Once removed, the samples are placed in the proper sample container for the
specified analytical method. For samples collected for the MADEP VPH and EPA Method 8260, a
TerraCore® sampler is used to collect one 5‐gram allotment of soil. The allotment is placed in
methanol‐preserved 40 mL vials. Also, one 5‐gram allotment of soil is placed into sodium bisulfate‐
preserved 40 mL vials (one 5‐gram allotment per vial, 2 vials per sample) for the 8260 low
concentration method. A 250‐mL glass jar of the sampled soil is also collected to provide moisture
content information. Soils sampled for MADEP EPH, EPA Method 8270 and TPH 5030 and 3550 are
placed in a 250‐mL glass jar (for MADEP EPH analysis an amber jar is required). TPH 5030 samples
are preserved in methanol similar to the 8260 analysis. Field personnel wear new, disposable
nitrile gloves during the collection of each sample.
The soil samples are labeled with the sample location, sample identification, date and time of
collection, and the analytical method. The samples are placed on ice, sent to a laboratory, and
analyzed before the expiration of an analytical method’s prescribed holding time. Chain‐of‐custody
documentation is maintained for each sample collected in the field.
If the soil is being sampled for volatile or semi‐volatile compounds, a portion of the collected soil is
placed in a sealable bag and screened for volatile organic vapors. Head screening procedures are
described in the following paragraph.
Headspace Screening
Collected soil samples are routinely tested for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
After retrieval from the ground, a portion of a soil sample is placed in a sealable plastic bag. The
soil samples are then set aside for approximately five minutes so that volatile constituents present
in the sample can reach equilibrium concentrations with headspace gases in the bag. Once a
suitable time period has passed, the probe of the sampling instrument, typically an Organic Vapor
Monitor (OVM) or a Photo Ionization Detector (PID), is inserted into the bag and the relative
concentration of total VOCs is measured and permanently recorded in a field note book. VOC
Page 3 of 8
concentrations are measured using either a Thermo Electron Corp. Innova Series catalytic OVM or
an Ion Science PhoCheck PID. Both the OVM and PID instrumentation are periodically calibrated
according to the manufacturer’s recommended procedures.
The OVM and PID are qualitative tools employed to detect and estimate the concentration of
organic or hydrocarbon vapors. A thin probe is inserted through a small break in the seal of a
bagged soil sample. For the OVM, an air sample from the headspace of the bag is drawn through
the probe into an internal chamber where the vapors are catalyzed. The concentration of the VOCs
is registered on a digital scale in parts per million (ppm). For the PID, an air sample from the
headspace of the bag is drawn across the face of a lamp causing the sample to emit photons, the
presence of which are converted into a VOC ppm reading that is displayed. Oxygen levels are field
calibrated prior to each use. VOC calibration occurs periodically depending upon use by using a
span gas of known concentration in a process recommended by the manufacturer.
Well Installation/Construction
Monitoring wells are installed using hand‐operated sampling tools, a truck‐mounted drill rig, or a
Geoprobe drilling rig depending on the depth of well and other site‐specific conditions. All
monitoring wells are installed according to the requirements of 15A NCAC 2C‐Well Construction
Standards. Specifically, individual monitoring wells are constructed of 2‐inch diameter, schedule 40
PVC casing riser and screen. The screen interval is generally 10 to 15 feet of machine slotted PVC
with a slot size of 0.010". Only flush threaded joints are used. The annulus space around the
screen is filled with washed filter pack No. 2 sand. The filter pack extends one to two feet above
the top of the screen. A one to two foot‐thick bentonite pellet seal is then placed above the filter
pack. The remainder of the well annulus is completely filled with a Portland (Type I/II) cement
grout mixture. A protective outer steel manhole, locking cap, and concrete pad is installed for each
well.
Type II Monitoring Well Construction
Single‐cased monitoring wells are generally used in delineation of groundwater quality within the
surficial aquifer. The wells are constructed of 2‐inch diameter, schedule 40 PVC casing and screen.
The screen interval is generally 10 to 15 feet of machine slotted PVC with a slot size of 0.010". Only
flush threaded joints are used. The annulus space around the screen is filled with washed filter
pack No. 2 sand. The filter pack extends one to two feet above the top of the screen. A one to two
foot‐thick bentonite pellet seal is then placed above the filter pack. The remainder of the well
annulus is completely filled with a Portland (Type I/II) cement grout mixture. A protective outer
steel manhole, locking cap, and concrete pad are installed for each well.
Type III Monitoring Well Construction
Double‐cased monitoring wells are used in the delineation of groundwater quality within a deeper
portion of the surficial aquifer or an additional aquifer (e.g. aquitard, bedrock). A four to six‐inch
outer casing is installed through the surficial aquifer until a sufficient depth or until the deeper
Page 4 of 8
aquifer is encountered. The casing is secured with a Portland‐grout collar that is tremmied into the
annular spaced from the bottom of the bore hole to the surface. Once the grout has sufficiently
cured, the bore hole is continued through the bottom of the outer casing to a depth approximately
15 ‐ 20 feet beneath the outer casing. The inner casing is constructed of 2‐inch diameter, schedule
40 PVC casing riser and screen. The screen interval is generally 5 to 10 feet of machine slotted PVC
with a slot size of 0.010". Only flush threaded joints are used. The annulus space around the
screen is filled with washed filter pack No. 2 sand. The filter pack extends one to two feet above
the top of the screen. A one to two foot‐thick bentonite pellet seal is then placed above the filter
pack. The remainder of the well annulus is completely filled with the same Portland grout mixture
used in the outer casing. A protective outer steel manhole, locking cap, and concrete pad are
installed for each well.
Well Development
Following installation of each well, surging and pumping or bailing techniques will be used to
remove fines from the screened interval. Groundwater is removed from each well until clear water
is retrieved or a noticeable reduction in the amount of silt is achieved. Purged groundwater is
disposed of in an environmentally safe manner.
Groundwater Sampling
Petroleum Sites
Groundwater samples are collected from temporary or permanent monitoring wells according to
established sampling protocol. When multiple monitoring wells or sampling points are sampled,
sampling is completed beginning with the least contaminated well to the most contaminated well,
if it is known. When permanent monitoring wells for petroleum sites are sampled, the well is
purged of a minimum of three well‐bore volumes prior to sample collection in order to assure that
sampled water is representative of aquifer conditions. In temporary wells, the first water which
migrates into the open borehole is sampled. Samples from both temporary and permanent
monitoring wells are collected using individually wrapped disposable polyethylene bailers by field
personnel wearing disposable nitrile gloves. Only one well is sampled with a given bailer in order to
prevent sample cross‐contamination. During both well purging and sampling, proper protective
clothing and equipment is used and is dependent upon the type and level of contaminants present.
Also, field personnel change gloves between different samples to reduce the chance of cross‐
contamination. Water samples are transferred from the bailer to laboratory‐prepared sampling
containers using slow emptying devices to reduce the chance of contamination loss through
volatilization. Preservatives, such as acids, are provided by the laboratory in pre‐prepared
containers in which collected samples are placed if in‐field preservation is necessary. The samples
are labeled with the project name, project number, sample identification, required analysis, and
date and time of collection. The samples are placed on ice, shipped to a certified laboratory, and
analyzed before the expiration of an analytical method’s prescribed holding time. Chain‐of‐custody
documentation is maintained for each sample collected in the field.
Page 5 of 8
Other Groundwater Sampling Protocols
When required by state or federal regulations, low‐flow groundwater sampling procedures are
instituted. Groundwater samples collected in low‐flow situations are collected using a peristaltic
pump. A peristaltic pump is a type of positive displacement pump. The fluid is contained within a
flexible tube fitted inside a circular pump casing. A rotor with a number of rollers attached to the
external circumference compresses the flexible tube. As the rotor turns, the part of tube under
compression closes thus forcing the fluid to be pumped to move through the tube. Groundwater
parameters such as water level drawdown, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen (DO) and turbidity.
Pumping rate, drawdown, and the time or volume required to obtain stabilization of parameter
readings can be used as a future guide to purge the well. Measurements are collected at a pre‐
pumping established interval (typically five to ten minutes). Once all or a majority of the
parameters have stabilized for three successive readings, stabilization has been achieved. In lieu of
measuring all five parameters, a minimum subset would include pH, conductivity, and turbidity or
DO. Three successive readings should be within ± 0.1 for pH, ± 3% for conductivity, and ± 10% for
turbidity and DO.
Upon parameter stabilization, sampling is initiated. Sampling flow rate is maintained at the estab‐
lished purge rate or is adjusted slightly to minimize aeration, bubble formation, turbulent filling of
sample bottles, or loss of volatiles due to extended residence time in tubing. The same device used
for purging is used to collect the groundwater sample. Generally, volatile parameters are sampled
first. The sequence in which samples for inorganic parameters are collected is not determined
unless filtered (dissolved) samples are collected. Preservatives, such as acids, are provided by the
laboratory in pre‐prepared containers in which collected samples are placed if in‐field preservation
is necessary. The samples are labeled with the project name, project number, sample
identification, required analysis, and date and time of collection. The samples are placed on ice,
shipped to a certified laboratory, and analyzed before the expiration of an analytical method’s
prescribed holding time. Chain‐of‐custody documentation is maintained for each sample collected
in the field.
During both well purging and sampling, proper protective clothing and equipment is used and is
dependent upon the type and level of contaminants present. Also, field personnel change gloves
between different monitoring wells or sampling points to reduce the chance of cross‐
contamination. When multiple monitoring wells or sampling points are sampled, sampling is
completed beginning with the least contaminated well to the most contaminated well, if it is
known.
Stockpile Sampling
The number of composite samples collected from a stockpile or a total quantity of excavated soil is
based upon the cubic yardage. One composite sample is collected for every 100 cubic yards of
contaminated soil excavated. The volume of a stockpile or total quantity of excavated soil is
calculated by approximating the general geometry of a stockpile or estimating the capacity of the
Page 6 of 8
dump trucks used for hauling. If a stockpile is sampled, a grid pattern is laid out on the stockpile,
dividing the stockpile into segments of approximately 200 cubic yards. Two soil borings are
advanced within a grid and three soil samples are collected from each soil boring at various depths.
The six soil samples are mixed into a composite sample by a trained TerraQuest technician. If truck
loads are sampled, an aliquot sample is collected from the hauling trucks at a frequency based
upon the capacity of the hauling trucks.
Aliquots are gently mixed into a composite sample by a trained TerraQuest technician. Every effort
is made to minimize the loss of contaminants through volatilization. The composited soil samples
are jarred in the appropriate laboratory‐prepared containers, labeled with the sample location,
sample identification, date of collection, time of collection, the analytical method, and the
preservative. The samples are placed on ice, shipped to a laboratory, and analyzed before the
expiration of an analytical method’s prescribed holding time. Chain‐of‐custody documentation is
maintained for each sample collected in the field.
Surface Water Sampling
Surface water samples, specifically samples from creeks or streams, are collected from a
moving/flowing portion of the creek or stream to ensure that stagnant water is not collected. Field
personnel are careful to collect samples from flowing areas that are not so turbulent as to cause a
loss of volatile contaminants which might have been contained in the creek’s/stream’s water.
Samples are collected by field personnel wearing disposable nitrile gloves. Field personnel change
gloves between different locations to reduce the chance of cross‐contamination. Samples are
collected directly from the appropriate creek or stream location and placed into the appropriate
laboratory‐prepared containers. Preservatives, such as acids, are provided by the laboratory in pre‐
prepared containers in which collected samples are placed if in‐field preservation is necessary. The
samples are labeled with the project name, project number, sample identification, required
analysis, and date and time of collection. The samples are cooled on ice to approximately four
degrees centigrade, shipped to a certified laboratory, and analyzed before the expiration of an
analytical method’s prescribed holding time. Chain‐of‐custody documentation is maintained for
each sample collected in the field.
Potable Well Sampling
Groundwater samples from potable wells are collected from sampling points, typically spigots,
located in the closest proximity to the potable well pump house as possible. Prior to sample
collection, the water is run for a sufficient amount of time to purge the bladder tank and assure
that sampled water is representative of aquifer conditions. Once purged, the flow rate is reduced
and samples are placed in the appropriate laboratory prepared containers with the appropriate
acid preservatives added if preservation of the sample is necessary. The samples are labeled with
the project name, project number, sample identification, required analysis, and date and time of
collection. The samples are placed on ice, shipped to a laboratory, and analyzed before the
expiration of an analytical method’s prescribed holding time. Chain‐of‐custody documentation is
maintained for each sample collected in the field.
Page 7 of 8
Public Water Supply Line Sampling
Groundwater samples from public water supply lines are collected from sampling points, typically
spigots. To sample the spigot, the flow rate is reduced and samples are placed in the appropriate
laboratory prepared containers. The samples are labeled with the sample location, sample
identification, date of collection, time of collection, and required analytical method. The samples
are placed on ice, shipped to a laboratory, and analyzed before the expiration of an analytical
method’s prescribed holding time. Chain‐of‐custody documentation is maintained for each sample
collected in the field.
Air Sampling
Air samples are collected with the aide of a manually operated MityVac® pump manufactured by
Pristech, Inc. The air sampling process begins by connecting a length of rubber hose from the
MityVac® pump to the port to be sampled, or by hanging the hose inside of an emissions stack in
such a manner as to ensure no outside air causes dilution. Another length of hose is fixed to the
outlet port of the pump and is connected to a new Tedlar bag. Once the pump is hooked up, a
valve on the Tedlar collection bag is opened and air is manually forced into the bag by the pumping
action of sampling personnel.
Field Measurements
Field measurements taken to determine the pH, conductivity, temperature, and dissolved oxygen
concentration of a particular groundwater sample are taken directly after a particular monitoring
well has been adequately purged. This ensures that the groundwater parameter data collected is
representative of the aquifer conditions at a given location. Once purging of the monitoring well is
complete, the decontaminated probe head and cord of the appropriate unit is lowered into the
required monitoring well. If the depth to water in a specific monitoring well is greater than the
length of cord for a particular unit, a new, disposable bailer is slowly lowered into the appropriate
monitoring well and a representative groundwater sample is retrieved. A slow pouring device is
fitted onto the end of the disposable bailer and the sample is slowly poured into a new, disposable
plastic cup. Groundwater parameter data are then collected from the groundwater in the cup
using the required unit.
For pH, conductivity, and temperature, a Hanna Instruments Model 991300 portable meter is
utilized. This unit is periodically calibrated and maintained in accordance with the unit’s operations
manual by field personnel. Prior to data collection, the unit is properly decontaminated to prevent
cross‐contamination. The unit is decontaminated between each sample. The procedure used for
sample measurement involves lowering the meter’s probe into the new, disposable cup containing
the groundwater sample to be measured and slowly stirring the probe to force groundwater across
the probe’s membrane. The measurements displayed by the meter are then recorded.
For dissolved oxygen concentration measurements, a YSI® Model 55 Handheld Dissolved Oxygen
System is utilized. This unit is periodically calibrated and maintained in accordance with the unit’s
Page 8 of 8
operations manual by field personnel. Prior to data collection, the unit is properly decontaminated
to prevent cross‐contamination. The unit is decontaminated between each sample. The procedure
used for sample measurement involves adjusting the unit for the correct altitude where the
sampling will take place and adjusting the reported units desired. Once this is done, the unit’s
probe is inserted into the groundwater sample to be measured and the probe is slowly stirred to
force the groundwater across the probe’s membrane. The measurements displayed by the unit are
then recorded.
For turbidity measurements, a Hach 2100P Portable Turbidity meter or equal equivalent is utilized.
The unit is calibrated prior to use in accordance with the unit’s operations manual by field
personnel. Groundwater samples are collected in glass containers for measurement by the
instrument. The glass containers are washed with bottled‐water between each measurement
collection. Once the sample is collected and inserted into the instrument, the measurements
displayed by the instrument are then recorded.
APPENDIX B
10/28/21 6/9/22 12/1/22
Well ID
Top of Casing Free Product Groundwater Free Product Groundwater Free Product Groundwater
Facility ID. No. 0-027378
62
1
0
D
/
6
2
0
0
B
62
1
0
D
/
6
2
0
0
B
62
1
0
D
/
6
2
0
0
B
62
1
0
D
/
6
2
0
0
B
62
1
0
D
/
6
2
0
0
B
62
1
0
D
/
6
2
0
0
B
62
1
0
D
/
6
2
0
0
B
62
1
0
D
/
6
2
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
1
0
D
/
6
2
0
0
B
-
6
2
5
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
62
0
0
B
60
1
0
B
MA
D
E
P
V
P
H
MA
D
E
P
V
P
H
/
E
P
H
MA
D
E
P
E
P
H
MA
D
E
P
V
P
H
/
E
P
H
Sample ID Date Collected
18.0 <100 <200 <100 <200
715 1,260 116 588 < 1.98 18.7 37.5 18 99 44.1 37 <<5.5 3.4-<0.542 -11.6 <<<-4,970 919.2 < 80.0 300
1,380 2,480 191 995 < 14.8 70.5 66.1 30 133 92.6 66.7 213 << 10.6 < 20.0 -16.1 <<<-----
1,130 949 39.9 761 4.27 53.3 45.1 21.1 11.3 60.8 47.9 < 10.0 0.97 4.78 < 1.00 0.839 9.32 <<<-----
1,420 507 9.35 1,050 2.86 89.2 69.6 28 <<<< 100 < 10.0 << 30.0 << 6.90 < 7.10 << 6.30 -----
1,610 363 19 928 17.3 233 60.8 32.2 111 < 14.0 <266 << 5.30 < 30.0 < 7.60 < 6.90 < 7.10 < 7.00 < 6.30 -----
5,440 17,500 1,650 8,470 < 22.0 232 1,270 340 < 260 249 < 180 < 1000 < 60.0 55.9 254 < 76.0 182 <<<-----
2,990 7,130 693 4,000 20.9 202 782 170 <<<< 500 < 50.0 <309 74 < 35.5 << 31.5 -----
2,600 3,010 385 3,260 14.5 169 579 172 < 52.0 < 28.0 << 200 <19.9 174 22.6 49.6 < 14.2 < 14.0 < 12.6 -----
129 251 20 70.7 < 0.220 0.649 4.3 7.78 14.1 11 4.74 45.5 < 0.600 0.828 5.26 < 0.760 1.51 <<<-----
6.31 11 1.93 6.16 < 0.220 0.376 2.25 5.43 <<<79.3 1.06 <4.25 << 0.690 0.726 <0.633 -----
2.92 3.32 8.15 60.8 < 0.220 0.22 25.8 56.8 < 2.60 1.77 << 10.0 <3.13 49.9 < 0.760 2.65 2.91 1.5 2.81 -----
0.279 0.627 < 0.500 1.61 < 0.220 < 0.200 0.96 1.17 4.77 4.58 < 1.80 16.9 < 0.600 < 0.530 1.99 < 0.760 < 0.690 <<<-----
-----
Bold denotes a detection
APPENDIX C
ANALYTICAL REPORT
PREPARED FOR
Attn: Ryan Kerins
Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
100 E. Ruffin Street
Mebane, North Carolina 27302
Generated 12/9/2022 6:18:47 PM
JOB DESCRIPTION
Barkers
JOB NUMBER
400-229832-1
See page two for job notes and contact information.
Pensacola FL 32514
3355 McLemore Drive
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 1 of 33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Eurofins Pensacola
Eurofins Pensacola is a laboratory within Eurofins Environment Testing Southeast, LLC, a company within Eurofins Environment Testing Group of Companies
Job Notes
The test results in this report meet all NELAP requirements for accredited parameters, unless otherwise noted, and relate
only to the referenced samples. Pursuant to NELAP, this report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written
approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address listed on this page, or
the telephone number at the bottom of the page. Eurofins Environment Testing Southeast LLC, Pensacola Certifications and
Approvals: Alabama (40150), Arizona (AZ0710), Arkansas (88-0689), Florida (E81010), Illinois (200041), Iowa (367), Kansas
(E-10253), Kentucky UST (53), Louisiana (30748), Maryland (233), Massachusetts (M-FL094), Michigan (9912), New
Hampshire (250510), New Jersey (FL006), North Carolina (314), Oklahoma (9810), Pennsylvania (68-00467), Rhode Island
(LAO00307), South Carolina (96026), Tennessee (TN02907), Texas (T104704286-10-2), Virginia (00008), Washington
(C2043), West Virginia (136), USDA Foreign Soil Permit (P330-08-00006).
The test results in this report relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory and will meet all requirements of the
methodology, with any exceptions noted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the express written
approval of the laboratory. All questions should be directed to the Eurofins Environment Testing Southeast, LLC Project
Manager.
Authorization
Generated
12/9/2022 6:18:47 PM
Authorized for release by
Chad Bechtold, Project Manager
Chad.Bechtold@et.eurofinsus.com
(813)690-3563
Page 2 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table of Contents
Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Laboratory Job ID: 400-229832-1
Page 3 of 33 Eurofins Pensacola12/9/2022
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Detection Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Surrogate Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
QC Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32
Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case Narrative
Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC Job ID: 400-229832-1
Project/Site: Barkers
Job ID: 400-229832-1
Laboratory: Eurofins Pensacola
Narrative
Job Narrative
400-229832-1
Receipt
The samples were received on 12/2/2022 9:02 AM. Unless otherwise noted below, the samples arrived in good condition, and, where
required, properly preserved and on ice. The temperature of the cooler at receipt time was 9.6°C
Receipt Exceptions
The following samples were received at the laboratory outside the required temperature criteria: TQMW1 (400-229832-1), TQMW2
(400-229832-2), TQMW3 (400-229832-3), TQMW4 (400-229832-4) and TQMW5 (400-229832-5). The client was contacted regarding this
issue, and the laboratory was instructed to proceed with the analysis.
GC/MS VOA
Method SM6200_B: The matrix spike / matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries for analytical batch 400-603986 were outside control
limits for one or more analytes. Sample matrix interference is suspected because the associated laboratory control sample (LCS)
recovery is within acceptance limits.
Method SM6200_B: The following samples were diluted to bring the concentration of target analytes within the calibration range: TQMW1
(400-229832-1) and TQMW2 (400-229832-2). Elevated reporting limits (RLs) are provided.
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/ Glossary page.
Eurofins PensacolaPage 4 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Detection Summary
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Client Sample ID: TQMW1 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-1
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
RL
10.0 ug/L
MDL
8.20
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA1060.8 SM6200-B
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 10.0 ug/L5.60 Total/NA1032.2 SM6200-B
2-Butanone (MEK)250 ug/L26.0 Total/NA10111JSM6200-B
Acetone 250 ug/L100 Total/NA10266SM6200-B
Benzene 10.0 ug/L1.30 Total/NA101610SM6200-B
Diisopropyl ether 10.0 ug/L2.00 Total/NA10233SM6200-B
Ethylbenzene 10.0 ug/L5.00 Total/NA1019.0 SM6200-B
Methyl tert-butyl ether 10.0 ug/L2.20 Total/NA1017.3 SM6200-B
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 50.0 ug/L6.30 Total/NA10659SM6200-B
o-Xylene 50.0 ug/L6.00 Total/NA10269SM6200-B
Toluene 10.0 ug/L4.10 Total/NA10363SM6200-B
Xylenes, Total 100 ug/L16.0 Total/NA10928SM6200-B
Client Sample ID: TQMW2 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-2
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
RL
20.0 ug/L
MDL
16.4
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA20579SM6200-B
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 20.0 ug/L11.2 Total/NA20172SM6200-B
Benzene 20.0 ug/L2.60 Total/NA202600SM6200-B
Diisopropyl ether 20.0 ug/L4.00 Total/NA20169SM6200-B
Ethylbenzene 20.0 ug/L10.0 Total/NA20385SM6200-B
Isopropylbenzene 20.0 ug/L10.6 Total/NA2019.9 J SM6200-B
Methyl tert-butyl ether 20.0 ug/L4.40 Total/NA2014.5 J SM6200-B
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 100 ug/L12.6 Total/NA202340SM6200-B
Naphthalene 100 ug/L60.0 Total/NA20174SM6200-B
n-Butylbenzene 20.0 ug/L15.2 Total/NA2022.6 SM6200-B
N-Propylbenzene 20.0 ug/L13.8 Total/NA2049.6 SM6200-B
o-Xylene 100 ug/L12.0 Total/NA20923SM6200-B
Toluene 20.0 ug/L8.20 Total/NA203010SM6200-B
Xylenes, Total 200 ug/L32.0 Total/NA203260SM6200-B
Client Sample ID: TQMW3 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-3
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
RL
1.00 ug/L
MDL
0.820
Analyte Result Qualifier Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type
Total/NA125.8 SM6200-B
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.00 ug/L0.560 Total/NA156.8 SM6200-B
2-Hexanone 25.0 ug/L1.40 Total/NA11.77 J SM6200-B
Benzene 1.00 ug/L0.130 Total/NA12.92 SM6200-B
Diisopropyl ether 1.00 ug/L0.200 Total/NA10.220 J SM6200-B
Ethylbenzene 1.00 ug/L0.500 Total/NA18.15 SM6200-B
Isopropylbenzene 1.00 ug/L0.530 Total/NA13.13 SM6200-B
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 5.00 ug/L0.630 Total/NA129.1 SM6200-B
Naphthalene 5.00 ug/L3.00 Total/NA149.9 SM6200-B
N-Propylbenzene 1.00 ug/L0.690 Total/NA12.65 SM6200-B
o-Xylene 5.00 ug/L0.600 Total/NA131.8 SM6200-B
p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)1.00 ug/L0.710 Total/NA12.91 SM6200-B
sec-Butylbenzene 1.00 ug/L0.700 Total/NA11.50 SM6200-B
tert-Butylbenzene 1.00 ug/L0.630 Total/NA12.81 SM6200-B
Toluene 1.00 ug/L0.410 Total/NA13.32 SM6200-B
Xylenes, Total 10.0 ug/L1.60 Total/NA160.8 SM6200-B
Eurofins Pensacola
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 5 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Detection Summary
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Client Sample ID: TQMW4 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4
No Detections.
Client Sample ID: TQMW5 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-5
No Detections.
Eurofins Pensacola
This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results.
Page 6 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Sample Summary
Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC Job ID: 400-229832-1
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received
400-229832-1 TQMW1 Water 12/01/22 13:05 12/02/22 09:02
400-229832-2 TQMW2 Water 12/01/22 13:12 12/02/22 09:02
400-229832-3 TQMW3 Water 12/01/22 13:21 12/02/22 09:02
400-229832-4 TQMW4 Water 12/01/22 13:30 12/02/22 09:02
400-229832-5 TQMW5 Water 12/01/22 13:38 12/02/22 09:02
Eurofins PensacolaPage 7 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-1Client Sample ID: TQMW1
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:05
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds
RL MDL
1.60 U 10.0 1.60 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 10
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
10.0 1.80 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 101.80 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
50.0 2.10 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 102.10 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 U1,1-Dichloroethane
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 U1,1-Dichloroethene
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 U1,1-Dichloropropene
10.0 9.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 109.00 U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
50.0 8.40 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 108.40 U1,2,3-Trichloropropane
10.0 8.20 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 108.20 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10.0 8.20 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 1060.81,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
10.0 2.30 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 102.30 U1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10.0 1.90 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 101.90 U1,2-Dichloroethane
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 U1,2-Dichloropropane
10.0 5.60 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 1032.21,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
10.0 5.40 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.40 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 U1,3-Dichloropropane
10.0 6.40 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 106.40 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 U2,2-Dichloropropane
250 26.0 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 10111J2-Butanone (MEK)
10.0 5.70 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.70 U2-Chlorotoluene
250 14.0 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 1014.0 U2-Hexanone
10.0 5.60 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.60 U4-Chlorotoluene
250 18.0 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 1018.0 U4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
250 100 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 10266Acetone
10.0 1.30 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 101610Benzene
10.0 5.40 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.40 UBromobenzene
10.0 2.10 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 102.10 UBromochloromethane
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 UBromodichloromethane
50.0 2.50 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 102.50 UBromoform
10.0 9.80 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 109.80 UBromomethane
10.0 1.90 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 101.90 UCarbon tetrachloride
10.0 1.50 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 101.50 UChlorobenzene
10.0 7.60 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 107.60 UChloroethane
10.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 1010.0 UChloroform
10.0 3.20 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 103.20 UChloromethane
10.0 2.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 102.00 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene
50.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10.0 2.40 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 102.40 UDibromochloromethane
10.0 8.50 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 108.50 UDichlorodifluoromethane
10.0 2.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 10233Diisopropyl ether
1000 240 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 10240UEthanol
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 1019.0Ethylbenzene
10.0 5.30 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.30 UIsopropylbenzene
10.0 2.20 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 1017.3Methyl tert-butyl ether
50.0 30.0 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 1030.0 UMethylene Chloride
50.0 6.30 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 10659m-Xylene & p-Xylene
50.0 30.0 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 1030.0 UNaphthalene
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 8 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-1Client Sample ID: TQMW1
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:05
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
RL MDL
7.60 U 10.0 7.60 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 10
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
n-Butylbenzene
10.0 6.90 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 106.90 UN-Propylbenzene
50.0 6.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 10269o-Xylene
10.0 7.10 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 107.10 Up-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
10.0 7.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 107.00 Usec-Butylbenzene
10.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 1010.0 UStyrene
10.0 6.30 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 106.30 Utert-Butylbenzene
10.0 9.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 109.00 UTetrachloroethene
10.0 4.10 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 10363Toluene
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
50.0 2.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 102.00 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10.0 1.50 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 101.50 UTrichloroethene
10.0 5.20 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.20 UTrichlorofluoromethane
250 9.30 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 109.30 UVinyl acetate
10.0 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 105.00 UVinyl chloride
100 16.0 ug/L 12/08/22 12:24 10928Xylenes, Total
4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 72-119 12/08/22 12:24 10
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Dibromofluoromethane 98 12/08/22 12:24 1075-126
Toluene-d8 (Surr)89 12/08/22 12:24 1064-132
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 9 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-2Client Sample ID: TQMW2
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:12
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds
RL MDL
3.20 U 20.0 3.20 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 20
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
20.0 3.60 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 203.60 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
100 4.20 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 204.20 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 U1,1-Dichloroethane
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 U1,1-Dichloroethene
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 U1,1-Dichloropropene
20.0 18.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2018.0 U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
100 16.8 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2016.8 U1,2,3-Trichloropropane
20.0 16.4 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2016.4 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
20.0 16.4 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 205791,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
20.0 4.60 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 204.60 U1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene
20.0 3.80 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 203.80 U1,2-Dichloroethane
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 U1,2-Dichloropropane
20.0 11.2 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 201721,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
20.0 10.8 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.8 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 U1,3-Dichloropropane
20.0 12.8 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2012.8 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 U2,2-Dichloropropane
500 52.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2052.0 U2-Butanone (MEK)
20.0 11.4 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2011.4 U2-Chlorotoluene
500 28.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2028.0 U2-Hexanone
20.0 11.2 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2011.2 U4-Chlorotoluene
500 36.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2036.0 U4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
500 200 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 20200UAcetone
20.0 2.60 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 202600Benzene
20.0 10.8 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.8 UBromobenzene
20.0 4.20 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 204.20 UBromochloromethane
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 UBromodichloromethane
100 5.00 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 205.00 UBromoform
20.0 19.6 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2019.6 UBromomethane
20.0 3.80 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 203.80 UCarbon tetrachloride
20.0 3.00 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 203.00 UChlorobenzene
20.0 15.2 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2015.2 UChloroethane
20.0 20.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2020.0 UChloroform
20.0 6.40 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 206.40 UChloromethane
20.0 4.00 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 204.00 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene
100 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene
20.0 4.80 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 204.80 UDibromochloromethane
20.0 17.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2017.0 UDichlorodifluoromethane
20.0 4.00 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 20169Diisopropyl ether
2000 480 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 20480UEthanol
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 20385Ethylbenzene
20.0 10.6 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2019.9 JIsopropylbenzene
20.0 4.40 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2014.5 JMethyl tert-butyl ether
100 60.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2060.0 UMethylene Chloride
100 12.6 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 202340m-Xylene & p-Xylene
100 60.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 20174Naphthalene
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 10 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-2Client Sample ID: TQMW2
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:12
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
RL MDL
22.6 20.0 15.2 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 20
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
n-Butylbenzene
20.0 13.8 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2049.6N-Propylbenzene
100 12.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 20923o-Xylene
20.0 14.2 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2014.2 Up-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
20.0 14.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2014.0 Usec-Butylbenzene
20.0 20.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2020.0 UStyrene
20.0 12.6 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2012.6 Utert-Butylbenzene
20.0 18.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2018.0 UTetrachloroethene
20.0 8.20 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 203010Toluene
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
100 4.00 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 204.00 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
20.0 3.00 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 203.00 UTrichloroethene
20.0 10.4 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.4 UTrichlorofluoromethane
500 18.6 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2018.6 UVinyl acetate
20.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 2010.0 UVinyl chloride
200 32.0 ug/L 12/08/22 13:12 203260Xylenes, Total
4-Bromofluorobenzene 95 72-119 12/08/22 13:12 20
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Dibromofluoromethane 96 12/08/22 13:12 2075-126
Toluene-d8 (Surr)91 12/08/22 13:12 2064-132
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 11 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-3Client Sample ID: TQMW3
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:21
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds
RL MDL
0.160 U 1.00 0.160 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.00 0.180 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.180 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
5.00 0.210 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.210 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 U1,1-Dichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 U1,1-Dichloroethene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 U1,1-Dichloropropene
1.00 0.900 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.900 U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
5.00 0.840 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.840 U1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1.00 0.820 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.820 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1.00 0.820 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 125.81,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1.00 0.230 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.230 U1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.00 0.190 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.190 U1,2-Dichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 U1,2-Dichloropropane
1.00 0.560 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 156.81,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1.00 0.540 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.540 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 U1,3-Dichloropropane
1.00 0.640 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.640 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 U2,2-Dichloropropane
25.0 2.60 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 12.60 U2-Butanone (MEK)
1.00 0.570 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.570 U2-Chlorotoluene
25.0 1.40 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 11.77 J2-Hexanone
1.00 0.560 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.560 U4-Chlorotoluene
25.0 1.80 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 11.80 U4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
25.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 110.0 UAcetone
1.00 0.130 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 12.92Benzene
1.00 0.540 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.540 UBromobenzene
1.00 0.210 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.210 UBromochloromethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 UBromodichloromethane
5.00 0.250 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.250 UBromoform
1.00 0.980 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.980 UBromomethane
1.00 0.190 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.190 UCarbon tetrachloride
1.00 0.150 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.150 UChlorobenzene
1.00 0.760 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.760 UChloroethane
1.00 1.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 11.00 UChloroform
1.00 0.320 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.320 UChloromethane
1.00 0.200 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.200 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.00 0.240 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.240 UDibromochloromethane
1.00 0.850 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.850 UDichlorodifluoromethane
1.00 0.200 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.220 JDiisopropyl ether
100 24.0 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 124.0 UEthanol
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 18.15Ethylbenzene
1.00 0.530 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 13.13Isopropylbenzene
1.00 0.220 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.220 UMethyl tert-butyl ether
5.00 3.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 13.00 UMethylene Chloride
5.00 0.630 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 129.1m-Xylene & p-Xylene
5.00 3.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 149.9Naphthalene
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 12 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-3Client Sample ID: TQMW3
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:21
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
RL MDL
0.760 U 1.00 0.760 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
n-Butylbenzene
1.00 0.690 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 12.65N-Propylbenzene
5.00 0.600 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 131.8o-Xylene
1.00 0.710 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 12.91p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
1.00 0.700 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 11.50sec-Butylbenzene
1.00 1.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 11.00 UStyrene
1.00 0.630 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 12.81tert-Butylbenzene
1.00 0.900 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.900 UTetrachloroethene
1.00 0.410 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 13.32Toluene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.00 0.200 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.200 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.00 0.150 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.150 UTrichloroethene
1.00 0.520 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.520 UTrichlorofluoromethane
25.0 0.930 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.930 UVinyl acetate
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 10.500 UVinyl chloride
10.0 1.60 ug/L 12/08/22 10:57 160.8Xylenes, Total
4-Bromofluorobenzene 96 72-119 12/08/22 10:57 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Dibromofluoromethane 98 12/08/22 10:57 175-126
Toluene-d8 (Surr)91 12/08/22 10:57 164-132
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 13 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4Client Sample ID: TQMW4
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:30
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds
RL MDL
0.160 U 1.00 0.160 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.00 0.180 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.180 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
5.00 0.210 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.210 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 U1,1-Dichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 U1,1-Dichloroethene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 U1,1-Dichloropropene
1.00 0.900 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.900 U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
5.00 0.840 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.840 U1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1.00 0.820 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.820 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1.00 0.820 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.820 U1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1.00 0.230 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.230 U1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.00 0.190 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.190 U1,2-Dichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 U1,2-Dichloropropane
1.00 0.560 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.560 U1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1.00 0.540 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.540 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 U1,3-Dichloropropane
1.00 0.640 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.640 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 U2,2-Dichloropropane
25.0 2.60 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 12.60 U2-Butanone (MEK)
1.00 0.570 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.570 U2-Chlorotoluene
25.0 1.40 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 11.40 U2-Hexanone
1.00 0.560 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.560 U4-Chlorotoluene
25.0 1.80 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 11.80 U4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
25.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 110.0 UAcetone
1.00 0.130 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.130 UBenzene
1.00 0.540 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.540 UBromobenzene
1.00 0.210 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.210 UBromochloromethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 UBromodichloromethane
5.00 0.250 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.250 UBromoform
1.00 0.980 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.980 UBromomethane
1.00 0.190 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.190 UCarbon tetrachloride
1.00 0.150 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.150 UChlorobenzene
1.00 0.760 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.760 UChloroethane
1.00 1.00 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 11.00 UChloroform
1.00 0.320 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.320 U F1Chloromethane
1.00 0.200 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.200 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.00 0.240 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.240 UDibromochloromethane
1.00 0.850 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.850 UDichlorodifluoromethane
1.00 0.200 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.200 UDiisopropyl ether
100 24.0 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 124.0 U F1Ethanol
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 UEthylbenzene
1.00 0.530 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.530 UIsopropylbenzene
1.00 0.220 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.220 UMethyl tert-butyl ether
5.00 3.00 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 13.00 UMethylene Chloride
5.00 0.630 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.630 Um-Xylene & p-Xylene
5.00 3.00 ug/L 12/09/22 10:36 13.00 UNaphthalene
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 14 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4Client Sample ID: TQMW4
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:30
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
RL MDL
0.760 U 1.00 0.760 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
n-Butylbenzene
1.00 0.690 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.690 UN-Propylbenzene
5.00 0.600 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.600 Uo-Xylene
1.00 0.710 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.710 Up-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
1.00 0.700 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.700 Usec-Butylbenzene
1.00 1.00 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 11.00 UStyrene
1.00 0.630 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.630 Utert-Butylbenzene
1.00 0.900 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.900 UTetrachloroethene
1.00 0.410 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.410 UToluene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.00 0.200 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.200 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.00 0.150 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.150 UTrichloroethene
1.00 0.520 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.520 UTrichlorofluoromethane
25.0 0.930 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.930 UVinyl acetate
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 10.500 UVinyl chloride
10.0 1.60 ug/L 12/08/22 11:19 11.60 UXylenes, Total
4-Bromofluorobenzene 96 72-119 12/08/22 11:19 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
4-Bromofluorobenzene 97 12/09/22 10:36 172-119
Dibromofluoromethane 98 12/08/22 11:19 175-126
Dibromofluoromethane 105 12/09/22 10:36 175-126
Toluene-d8 (Surr)91 12/08/22 11:19 164-132
Toluene-d8 (Surr)85 12/09/22 10:36 164-132
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 15 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-5Client Sample ID: TQMW5
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:38
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds
RL MDL
0.160 U 1.00 0.160 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.00 0.180 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.180 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
5.00 0.210 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.210 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 U1,1-Dichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 U1,1-Dichloroethene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 U1,1-Dichloropropene
1.00 0.900 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.900 U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
5.00 0.840 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.840 U1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1.00 0.820 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.820 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1.00 0.820 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.820 U1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1.00 0.230 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.230 U1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.00 0.190 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.190 U1,2-Dichloroethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 U1,2-Dichloropropane
1.00 0.560 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.560 U1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1.00 0.540 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.540 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 U1,3-Dichloropropane
1.00 0.640 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.640 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 U2,2-Dichloropropane
25.0 2.60 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 12.60 U2-Butanone (MEK)
1.00 0.570 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.570 U2-Chlorotoluene
25.0 1.40 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 11.40 U2-Hexanone
1.00 0.560 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.560 U4-Chlorotoluene
25.0 1.80 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 11.80 U4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
25.0 10.0 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 110.0 UAcetone
1.00 0.130 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.130 UBenzene
1.00 0.540 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.540 UBromobenzene
1.00 0.210 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.210 UBromochloromethane
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 UBromodichloromethane
5.00 0.250 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.250 UBromoform
1.00 0.980 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.980 UBromomethane
1.00 0.190 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.190 UCarbon tetrachloride
1.00 0.150 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.150 UChlorobenzene
1.00 0.760 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.760 UChloroethane
1.00 1.00 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 11.00 UChloroform
1.00 0.320 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.320 UChloromethane
1.00 0.200 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.200 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.00 0.240 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.240 UDibromochloromethane
1.00 0.850 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.850 UDichlorodifluoromethane
1.00 0.200 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.200 UDiisopropyl ether
100 24.0 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 124.0 UEthanol
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 UEthylbenzene
1.00 0.530 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.530 UIsopropylbenzene
1.00 0.220 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.220 UMethyl tert-butyl ether
5.00 3.00 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 13.00 UMethylene Chloride
5.00 0.630 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.630 Um-Xylene & p-Xylene
5.00 3.00 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 13.00 UNaphthalene
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 16 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Client Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-5Client Sample ID: TQMW5
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:38
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
RL MDL
0.760 U 1.00 0.760 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 1
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedUnitDResultQualifier
n-Butylbenzene
1.00 0.690 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.690 UN-Propylbenzene
5.00 0.600 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.600 Uo-Xylene
1.00 0.710 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.710 Up-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
1.00 0.700 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.700 Usec-Butylbenzene
1.00 1.00 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 11.00 UStyrene
1.00 0.630 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.630 Utert-Butylbenzene
1.00 0.900 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.900 UTetrachloroethene
1.00 0.410 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.410 UToluene
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
5.00 0.200 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.200 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.00 0.150 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.150 UTrichloroethene
1.00 0.520 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.520 UTrichlorofluoromethane
25.0 0.930 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.930 UVinyl acetate
1.00 0.500 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 10.500 UVinyl chloride
10.0 1.60 ug/L 12/08/22 11:40 11.60 UXylenes, Total
4-Bromofluorobenzene 97 72-119 12/08/22 11:40 1
Surrogate Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedQualifierLimits%Recovery
Dibromofluoromethane 99 12/08/22 11:40 175-126
Toluene-d8 (Surr)91 12/08/22 11:40 164-132
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 17 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Definitions/Glossary
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Qualifiers
GC/MS VOA
Qualifier Description
E Result exceeded calibration range.
Qualifier
F1 MS and/or MSD recovery exceeds control limits.
J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value.
U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected.
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
¤Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
CFL Contains Free Liquid
CFU Colony Forming Unit
CNF Contains No Free Liquid
DER Duplicate Error Ratio (normalized absolute difference)
Dil Fac Dilution Factor
DL Detection Limit (DoD/DOE)
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Re-analysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
DLC Decision Level Concentration (Radiochemistry)
EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
LOD Limit of Detection (DoD/DOE)
LOQ Limit of Quantitation (DoD/DOE)
MCL EPA recommended "Maximum Contaminant Level"
MDA Minimum Detectable Activity (Radiochemistry)
MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration (Radiochemistry)
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
MPN Most Probable Number
MQL Method Quantitation Limit
NC Not Calculated
ND Not Detected at the reporting limit (or MDL or EDL if shown)
NEG Negative / Absent
POS Positive / Present
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
PRES Presumptive
QC Quality Control
RER Relative Error Ratio (Radiochemistry)
RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit (Radiochemistry)
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TNTC Too Numerous To Count
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 18 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Surrogate Summary
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds
Prep Type: Total/NAMatrix: Water
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (72-119)(75-126)(64-132)
BFB DBFM TOL
98 98 89400-229832-1
Percent Surrogate Recovery (Acceptance Limits)
TQMW1
95 96 91400-229832-2 TQMW2
96 98 91400-229832-3 TQMW3
96 98 91400-229832-4 TQMW4
97 105 85400-229832-4 TQMW4
93 99 91400-229832-4 MS TQMW4
94 98 91400-229832-4 MSD TQMW4
97 99 91400-229832-5 TQMW5
96 97 90LCS 400-603986/1002 Lab Control Sample
91 102 87LCS 400-604170/1002 Lab Control Sample
98 103 92MB 400-603986/4 Method Blank
97 104 87MB 400-604170/4 Method Blank
Surrogate Legend
BFB = 4-Bromofluorobenzene
DBFM = Dibromofluoromethane
TOL = Toluene-d8 (Surr)
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 19 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Association Summary
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
GC/MS VOA
Analysis Batch: 603986
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Water SM6200-B400-229832-1 TQMW1 Total/NA
Water SM6200-B400-229832-2 TQMW2 Total/NA
Water SM6200-B400-229832-3 TQMW3 Total/NA
Water SM6200-B400-229832-4 TQMW4 Total/NA
Water SM6200-B400-229832-5 TQMW5 Total/NA
Water SM6200-BMB 400-603986/4 Method Blank Total/NA
Water SM6200-BLCS 400-603986/1002 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Water SM6200-B400-229832-4 MS TQMW4 Total/NA
Water SM6200-B400-229832-4 MSD TQMW4 Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 604170
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Water SM6200-B400-229832-4 TQMW4 Total/NA
Water SM6200-BMB 400-604170/4 Method Blank Total/NA
Water SM6200-BLCS 400-604170/1002 Lab Control Sample Total/NA
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 20 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 400-603986/4
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 603986
RL MDL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.160 U 1.00 0.160 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
0.180 U 0.1801.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.210 U 0.2105.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,1,2-Trichloroethane
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,1-Dichloroethane
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,1-Dichloroethene
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,1-Dichloropropene
0.900 U 0.9001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
0.840 U 0.8405.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,2,3-Trichloropropane
0.820 U 0.8201.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
0.820 U 0.8201.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
0.230 U 0.2301.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.190 U 0.1901.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,2-Dichloroethane
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,2-Dichloropropane
0.560 U 0.5601.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
0.540 U 0.5401.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,3-Dichlorobenzene
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,3-Dichloropropane
0.640 U 0.6401.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 11,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 12,2-Dichloropropane
2.60 U 2.6025.0 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 12-Butanone (MEK)
0.570 U 0.5701.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 12-Chlorotoluene
1.40 U 1.4025.0 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 12-Hexanone
0.560 U 0.5601.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 14-Chlorotoluene
1.80 U 1.8025.0 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
10.0 U 10.025.0 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Acetone
0.130 U 0.1301.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Benzene
0.540 U 0.5401.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Bromobenzene
0.210 U 0.2101.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Bromochloromethane
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Bromodichloromethane
0.250 U 0.2505.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Bromoform
0.980 U 0.9801.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Bromomethane
0.190 U 0.1901.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Carbon tetrachloride
0.150 U 0.1501.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Chlorobenzene
0.760 U 0.7601.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Chloroethane
1.00 U 1.001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Chloroform
0.320 U 0.3201.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Chloromethane
0.200 U 0.2001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
0.500 U 0.5005.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.240 U 0.2401.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Dibromochloromethane
0.850 U 0.8501.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Dichlorodifluoromethane
0.200 U 0.2001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Diisopropyl ether
24.0 U 24.0100 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Ethanol
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Ethylbenzene
0.530 U 0.5301.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Isopropylbenzene
0.220 U 0.2201.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Methyl tert-butyl ether
3.00 U 3.005.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Methylene Chloride
0.630 U 0.6305.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1m-Xylene & p-Xylene
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 21 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 400-603986/4
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 603986
RL MDL
Naphthalene 3.00 U 5.00 3.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
0.760 U 0.7601.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1n-Butylbenzene
0.690 U 0.6901.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1N-Propylbenzene
0.600 U 0.6005.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1o-Xylene
0.710 U 0.7101.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
0.700 U 0.7001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1sec-Butylbenzene
1.00 U 1.001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Styrene
0.630 U 0.6301.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1tert-Butylbenzene
0.900 U 0.9001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Tetrachloroethene
0.410 U 0.4101.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Toluene
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
0.200 U 0.2005.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.150 U 0.1501.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Trichloroethene
0.520 U 0.5201.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Trichlorofluoromethane
0.930 U 0.93025.0 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Vinyl acetate
0.500 U 0.5001.00 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Vinyl chloride
1.60 U 1.6010.0 ug/L 12/08/22 10:34 1Xylenes, Total
4-Bromofluorobenzene 98 72-119 12/08/22 10:34 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
103 12/08/22 10:34 1Dibromofluoromethane75-126
92 12/08/22 10:34 1Toluene-d8 (Surr)64-132
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 400-603986/1002
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 603986
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 48.15 ug/L 96 67 -131
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec
Limits
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.0 52.72 ug/L 105 68 -130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 43.99 ug/L 88 70 -131
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.0 46.10 ug/L 92 70 -130
1,1-Dichloroethane 50.0 57.40 ug/L 115 70 -130
1,1-Dichloroethene 50.0 48.92 ug/L 98 63 -134
1,1-Dichloropropene 50.0 52.47 ug/L 105 70 -130
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 51.69 ug/L 103 60 -138
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 50.0 43.48 ug/L 87 70 -130
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 51.16 ug/L 102 60 -140
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 50.0 46.07 ug/L 92 70 -130
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)50.0 45.77 ug/L 92 70 -130
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 48.45 ug/L 97 67 -130
1,2-Dichloroethane 50.0 51.74 ug/L 103 69 -130
1,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 60.64 ug/L 121 70 -130
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 50.0 46.44 ug/L 93 69 -130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 49.16 ug/L 98 70 -130
1,3-Dichloropropane 50.0 44.98 ug/L 90 70 -130
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 47.77 ug/L 96 70 -130
2,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 56.09 ug/L 112 52 -135
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 22 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 400-603986/1002
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 603986
2-Butanone (MEK)200 210.8 ug/L 105 61 -145
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec
Limits
2-Chlorotoluene 50.0 45.39 ug/L 91 70 -130
2-Hexanone 200 200.4 ug/L 100 65 -137
4-Chlorotoluene 50.0 46.60 ug/L 93 70 -130
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)200 232.1 ug/L 116 69 -138
Acetone 200 201.5 ug/L 101 43 -160
Benzene 50.0 51.62 ug/L 103 70 -130
Bromobenzene 50.0 46.23 ug/L 92 70 -132
Bromochloromethane 50.0 57.30 ug/L 115 70 -130
Bromodichloromethane 50.0 51.39 ug/L 103 67 -133
Bromoform 50.0 43.02 ug/L 86 57 -140
Bromomethane 50.0 44.93 ug/L 90 10 -160
Carbon tetrachloride 50.0 51.80 ug/L 104 61 -137
Chlorobenzene 50.0 50.40 ug/L 101 70 -130
Chloroethane 50.0 48.03 ug/L 96 55 -141
Chloroform 50.0 49.37 ug/L 99 69 -130
Chloromethane 50.0 67.50 ug/L 135 58 -137
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 59.71 ug/L 119 68 -130
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 54.05 ug/L 108 69 -132
Dibromochloromethane 50.0 46.72 ug/L 93 67 -135
Dichlorodifluoromethane 50.0 46.81 ug/L 94 41 -146
Diisopropyl ether 50.0 52.30 ug/L 105 64 -132
Ethanol 2000 2881 ug/L 144 20 -160
Ethylbenzene 50.0 47.77 ug/L 96 70 -130
Isopropylbenzene 50.0 48.57 ug/L 97 70 -130
Methyl tert-butyl ether 50.0 49.72 ug/L 99 66 -130
Methylene Chloride 50.0 49.23 ug/L 98 66 -135
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 50.0 48.63 ug/L 97 70 -130
Naphthalene 50.0 54.43 ug/L 109 47 -149
n-Butylbenzene 50.0 48.64 ug/L 97 67 -130
N-Propylbenzene 50.0 48.25 ug/L 97 70 -130
o-Xylene 50.0 48.61 ug/L 97 70 -130
p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)50.0 49.24 ug/L 98 65 -130
sec-Butylbenzene 50.0 46.97 ug/L 94 66 -130
Styrene 50.0 48.71 ug/L 97 70 -130
tert-Butylbenzene 50.0 52.59 ug/L 105 64 -139
Tetrachloroethene 50.0 50.22 ug/L 100 65 -130
Toluene 50.0 48.43 ug/L 97 70 -130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 52.58 ug/L 105 70 -130
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 45.45 ug/L 91 63 -130
Trichloroethene 50.0 55.41 ug/L 111 70 -130
Trichlorofluoromethane 50.0 50.60 ug/L 101 65 -138
Vinyl acetate 100 99.72 ug/L 100 26 -160
Vinyl chloride 50.0 52.79 ug/L 106 59 -136
Xylenes, Total 100 97.24 ug/L 97 70 -130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 72 -119
Surrogate
96
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 23 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 400-603986/1002
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 603986
Dibromofluoromethane 75 -126
Surrogate
97
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
90Toluene-d8 (Surr)64 -132
Client Sample ID: TQMW4Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4 MS
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 603986
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.160 U 50.0 43.28 ug/L 87 59 -137
Analyte
MS MS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec
Limits
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.180 U 50.0 50.19 ug/L 100 57 -142
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.500 U 50.0 40.03 ug/L 80 66 -135
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.210 U 50.0 44.02 ug/L 88 66 -131
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.500 U 50.0 56.76 ug/L 114 61 -144
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.500 U 50.0 43.17 ug/L 86 54 -147
1,1-Dichloropropene 0.500 U 50.0 48.41 ug/L 97 65 -136
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.900 U 50.0 39.98 ug/L 80 43 -145
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.840 U 50.0 39.08 ug/L 78 65 -133
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.820 U 50.0 38.43 ug/L 77 39 -148
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.820 U 50.0 34.98 ug/L 70 50 -139
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)0.230 U 50.0 42.15 ug/L 84 64 -132
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.500 U 50.0 37.58 ug/L 75 52 -137
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.190 U 50.0 52.49 ug/L 105 60 -141
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.500 U 50.0 58.28 ug/L 117 66 -137
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.560 U 50.0 34.58 ug/L 69 52 -135
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.540 U 50.0 36.84 ug/L 74 54 -135
1,3-Dichloropropane 0.500 U 50.0 42.10 ug/L 84 66 -133
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.640 U 50.0 35.87 ug/L 72 53 -135
2,2-Dichloropropane 0.500 U 50.0 54.95 ug/L 110 42 -144
2-Butanone (MEK)2.60 U 200 212.6 ug/L 106 55 -150
2-Chlorotoluene 0.570 U 50.0 32.99 ug/L 66 53 -134
2-Hexanone 1.40 U 200 194.5 ug/L 97 65 -140
4-Chlorotoluene 0.560 U 50.0 34.41 ug/L 69 54 -133
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)1.80 U 200 236.1 ug/L 118 63 -146
Acetone 10.0 U 200 207.8 ug/L 104 43 -150
Benzene 0.130 U 50.0 49.80 ug/L 100 56 -142
Bromobenzene 0.540 U 50.0 37.76 ug/L 76 59 -136
Bromochloromethane 0.210 U 50.0 56.74 ug/L 113 64 -140
Bromodichloromethane 0.500 U 50.0 47.88 ug/L 96 59 -143
Bromoform 0.250 U 50.0 38.83 ug/L 78 50 -140
Bromomethane 0.980 U 50.0 51.17 ug/L 102 10 -150
Carbon tetrachloride 0.190 U 50.0 49.13 ug/L 98 55 -145
Chlorobenzene 0.150 U 50.0 43.48 ug/L 87 64 -130
Chloroethane 0.760 U 50.0 58.17 ug/L 116 50 -150
Chloroform 1.00 U 50.0 48.43 ug/L 97 60 -141
Chloromethane 0.320 U F1 50.0 78.83 F1 ug/L 158 49 -148
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.200 U 50.0 57.67 ug/L 115 59 -143
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.500 U 50.0 50.36 ug/L 101 57 -140
Dibromochloromethane 0.240 U 50.0 43.68 ug/L 87 56 -143
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 24 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
Client Sample ID: TQMW4Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4 MS
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 603986
Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.850 U 50.0 56.11 ug/L 112 16 -150
Analyte
MS MS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec
Limits
Diisopropyl ether 0.200 U 50.0 55.86 ug/L 112 60 -144
Ethanol 24.0 U F1 2000 4277 E F1 ug/L 214 10 -150
Ethylbenzene 0.500 U 50.0 40.48 ug/L 81 58 -131
Isopropylbenzene 0.530 U 50.0 39.34 ug/L 79 56 -133
Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.220 U 50.0 49.28 ug/L 99 59 -137
Methylene Chloride 3.00 U 50.0 48.42 ug/L 97 60 -146
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 0.630 U 50.0 40.34 ug/L 81 57 -130
Naphthalene 4.92 J 50.0 48.12 ug/L 86 25 -150
n-Butylbenzene 0.760 U 50.0 33.98 ug/L 68 41 -142
N-Propylbenzene 0.690 U 50.0 35.88 ug/L 72 51 -138
o-Xylene 0.600 U 50.0 40.87 ug/L 82 61 -130
p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)0.710 U 50.0 35.57 ug/L 71 48 -139
sec-Butylbenzene 0.700 U 50.0 34.80 ug/L 70 50 -138
Styrene 1.00 U 50.0 40.46 ug/L 81 58 -131
tert-Butylbenzene 0.630 U 50.0 39.34 ug/L 79 54 -146
Tetrachloroethene 0.900 U 50.0 41.84 ug/L 84 52 -133
Toluene 0.410 U 50.0 42.89 ug/L 86 65 -130
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.500 U 50.0 49.80 ug/L 100 61 -143
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.200 U 50.0 40.92 ug/L 82 53 -133
Trichloroethene 0.150 U 50.0 52.09 ug/L 104 64 -136
Trichlorofluoromethane 0.520 U 50.0 61.18 ug/L 122 54 -150
Vinyl acetate 0.930 U 100 118.7 ug/L 119 26 -150
Vinyl chloride 0.500 U 50.0 64.91 ug/L 130 46 -150
Xylenes, Total 1.60 U 100 81.21 ug/L 81 59 -130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 72 -119
Surrogate
93
MS MS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
99Dibromofluoromethane 75 -126
91Toluene-d8 (Surr)64 -132
Client Sample ID: TQMW4Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4 MSD
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 603986
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.160 U 50.0 40.76 ug/L 82 59 -137 6 30
Analyte
MSD MSD
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.180 U 50.0 49.23 ug/L 98 57 -142 2 30
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.500 U 50.0 39.21 ug/L 78 66 -135 2 30
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.210 U 50.0 42.90 ug/L 86 66 -131 3 30
1,1-Dichloroethane 0.500 U 50.0 56.25 ug/L 113 61 -144 1 30
1,1-Dichloroethene 0.500 U 50.0 50.57 ug/L 101 54 -147 16 30
1,1-Dichloropropene 0.500 U 50.0 48.02 ug/L 96 65 -136 1 30
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.900 U 50.0 30.31 ug/L 61 43 -145 28 30
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.840 U 50.0 38.21 ug/L 76 65 -133 2 30
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.820 U 50.0 28.88 ug/L 58 39 -148 28 30
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.820 U 50.0 29.83 ug/L 60 50 -139 16 30
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)0.230 U 50.0 41.32 ug/L 83 64 -132 2 30
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 25 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
Client Sample ID: TQMW4Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4 MSD
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 603986
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.500 U 50.0 31.30 ug/L 63 52 -137 18 30
Analyte
MSD MSD
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.190 U 50.0 51.58 ug/L 103 60 -141 2 30
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.500 U 50.0 56.93 ug/L 114 66 -137 2 30
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.560 U 50.0 30.76 ug/L 62 52 -135 12 30
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.540 U 50.0 30.16 ug/L 60 54 -135 20 30
1,3-Dichloropropane 0.500 U 50.0 41.16 ug/L 82 66 -133 2 30
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.640 U 50.0 28.52 ug/L 57 53 -135 23 30
2,2-Dichloropropane 0.500 U 50.0 53.28 ug/L 107 42 -144 3 31
2-Butanone (MEK)2.60 U 200 216.7 ug/L 108 55 -150 2 30
2-Chlorotoluene 0.570 U 50.0 30.66 ug/L 61 53 -134 7 30
2-Hexanone 1.40 U 200 191.4 ug/L 96 65 -140 2 30
4-Chlorotoluene 0.560 U 50.0 29.24 ug/L 58 54 -133 16 30
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)1.80 U 200 240.0 ug/L 120 63 -146 2 30
Acetone 10.0 U 200 205.0 ug/L 102 43 -150 1 30
Benzene 0.130 U 50.0 48.31 ug/L 97 56 -142 3 30
Bromobenzene 0.540 U 50.0 33.80 ug/L 68 59 -136 11 30
Bromochloromethane 0.210 U 50.0 56.01 ug/L 112 64 -140 1 30
Bromodichloromethane 0.500 U 50.0 48.19 ug/L 96 59 -143 1 30
Bromoform 0.250 U 50.0 36.44 ug/L 73 50 -140 6 30
Bromomethane 0.980 U 50.0 52.75 ug/L 105 10 -150 3 50
Carbon tetrachloride 0.190 U 50.0 48.53 ug/L 97 55 -145 1 30
Chlorobenzene 0.150 U 50.0 39.98 ug/L 80 64 -130 8 30
Chloroethane 0.760 U 50.0 50.08 ug/L 100 50 -150 15 30
Chloroform 1.00 U 50.0 47.94 ug/L 96 60 -141 1 30
Chloromethane 0.320 U F1 50.0 70.54 ug/L 141 49 -148 11 31
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.200 U 50.0 57.92 ug/L 116 59 -143 0 30
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.500 U 50.0 49.23 ug/L 98 57 -140 2 30
Dibromochloromethane 0.240 U 50.0 41.75 ug/L 83 56 -143 5 30
Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.850 U 50.0 51.62 ug/L 103 16 -150 8 31
Diisopropyl ether 0.200 U 50.0 59.17 ug/L 118 60 -144 6 30
Ethanol 24.0 U F1 2000 4091 E F1 ug/L 205 10 -150 4 40
Ethylbenzene 0.500 U 50.0 37.69 ug/L 75 58 -131 7 30
Isopropylbenzene 0.530 U 50.0 35.74 ug/L 71 56 -133 10 30
Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.220 U 50.0 50.65 ug/L 101 59 -137 3 30
Methylene Chloride 3.00 U 50.0 46.86 ug/L 94 60 -146 3 32
m-Xylene & p-Xylene 0.630 U 50.0 36.56 ug/L 73 57 -130 10 30
Naphthalene 4.92 J 50.0 40.14 ug/L 70 25 -150 18 30
n-Butylbenzene 0.760 U 50.0 28.00 ug/L 56 41 -142 19 31
N-Propylbenzene 0.690 U 50.0 32.24 ug/L 64 51 -138 11 30
o-Xylene 0.600 U 50.0 37.13 ug/L 74 61 -130 10 30
p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)0.710 U 50.0 29.54 ug/L 59 48 -139 19 30
sec-Butylbenzene 0.700 U 50.0 30.31 ug/L 61 50 -138 14 30
Styrene 1.00 U 50.0 36.62 ug/L 73 58 -131 10 30
tert-Butylbenzene 0.630 U 50.0 35.23 ug/L 70 54 -146 11 30
Tetrachloroethene 0.900 U 50.0 40.47 ug/L 81 52 -133 3 30
Toluene 0.410 U 50.0 40.23 ug/L 80 65 -130 6 30
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.500 U 50.0 49.07 ug/L 98 61 -143 1 30
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.200 U 50.0 39.44 ug/L 79 53 -133 4 30
Trichloroethene 0.150 U 50.0 51.65 ug/L 103 64 -136 1 30
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 26 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
QC Sample Results
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Method: SM6200-B - Volatile Organic Compounds (Continued)
Client Sample ID: TQMW4Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4 MSD
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 603986
Trichlorofluoromethane 0.520 U 50.0 57.38 ug/L 115 54 -150 6 30
Analyte
MSD MSD
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
%Rec
Limits LimitRPD
RPD
Vinyl acetate 0.930 U 100 105.5 ug/L 105 26 -150 12 33
Vinyl chloride 0.500 U 50.0 58.87 ug/L 118 46 -150 10 30
Xylenes, Total 1.60 U 100 73.70 ug/L 74 59 -130 10 30
4-Bromofluorobenzene 72 -119
Surrogate
94
MSD MSD
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
98Dibromofluoromethane 75 -126
91Toluene-d8 (Surr)64 -132
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: MB 400-604170/4
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 604170
RL MDL
Naphthalene 3.00 U 5.00 3.00 ug/L 12/09/22 08:21 1
MB MB
Analyte Dil FacAnalyzedPreparedDUnitResultQualifier
4-Bromofluorobenzene 97 72-119 12/09/22 08:21 1
MB MB
Surrogate Dil FacPreparedAnalyzedQualifierLimits%Recovery
104 12/09/22 08:21 1Dibromofluoromethane75-126
87 12/09/22 08:21 1Toluene-d8 (Surr)64-132
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: LCS 400-604170/1002
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA
Analysis Batch: 604170
Naphthalene 50.0 51.80 ug/L 104 47 -149
Analyte
LCS LCS
DUnitResultQualifier %Rec
Spike
Added
%Rec
Limits
4-Bromofluorobenzene 72 -119
Surrogate
91
LCS LCS
Qualifier Limits%Recovery
102Dibromofluoromethane 75 -126
87Toluene-d8 (Surr)64 -132
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 27 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Lab Chronicle
Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC Job ID: 400-229832-1
Project/Site: Barkers
Client Sample ID: TQMW1 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-1
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:05
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/08/22 12:2410 EET PEN603986
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Client Sample ID: TQMW2 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-2
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:12
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/08/22 13:1220 EET PEN603986
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Client Sample ID: TQMW3 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-3
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:21
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/08/22 10:571 EET PEN603986
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Client Sample ID: TQMW4 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:30
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/08/22 11:191 EET PEN603986
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Analysis SM6200-B 1 604170 12/09/22 10:36 WPD EET PENTotal/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Client Sample ID: TQMW5 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-5
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:38
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/08/22 11:401 EET PEN603986
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Lab Sample ID: MB 400-603986/4
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: N/A
Date Received: N/A
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/08/22 10:341 EET PEN603986
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Client Sample ID: Method Blank Lab Sample ID: MB 400-604170/4
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: N/A
Date Received: N/A
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/09/22 08:211 EET PEN604170
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 28 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Lab Chronicle
Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC Job ID: 400-229832-1
Project/Site: Barkers
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Lab Sample ID: LCS 400-603986/1002
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: N/A
Date Received: N/A
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/08/22 09:251 EET PEN603986
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Lab Sample ID: LCS 400-604170/1002
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: N/A
Date Received: N/A
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/09/22 07:111 EET PEN604170
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Client Sample ID: TQMW4 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4 MS
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:30
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/08/22 14:171 EET PEN603986
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Client Sample ID: TQMW4 Lab Sample ID: 400-229832-4 MSD
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 12/01/22 13:30
Date Received: 12/02/22 09:02
Analysis SM6200-B WPD12/08/22 14:421 EET PEN603986
Type
Batch
Method
Batch
Prep Type LabAnalystRun
Prepared
or Analyzed
Initial
Amount Amount
Final Batch
NumberFactor
Dil
Total/NA 5 mL 5 mL
Laboratory References:
EET PEN = Eurofins Pensacola, 3355 McLemore Drive, Pensacola, FL 32514, TEL (850)474-1001
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 29 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Method Summary
Job ID: 400-229832-1Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC
Project/Site: Barkers
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
SMSM6200-B Volatile Organic Compounds EET PEN
SW8465030BPurge and Trap EET PEN
Protocol References:
SM = "Standard Methods For The Examination Of Water And Wastewater"
SW846 = "Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 And Its Updates.
Laboratory References:
EET PEN = Eurofins Pensacola, 3355 McLemore Drive, Pensacola, FL 32514, TEL (850)474-1001
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 30 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Accreditation/Certification Summary
Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC Job ID: 400-229832-1
Project/Site: Barkers
Laboratory: Eurofins Pensacola
Unless otherwise noted, all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below.
Authority Program Identification Number Expiration Date
North Carolina (WW/SW)State 314 12-31-22
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 31 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Pa
g
e
3
2
o
f
3
3
12
/
9
/
2
0
2
2
123456789101112131415
Login Sample Receipt Checklist
Client: Terraquest Environmental Consultants, PC Job Number: 400-229832-1
Login Number: 229832
Question Answer Comment
Creator: Whitley, Adrian
List Source: Eurofins Pensacola
List Number: 1
N/ARadioactivity wasn't checked or is </= background as measured by a survey
meter.
N/AThe cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact.
N/ASample custody seals, if present, are intact.
TrueThe cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or
tampered with.
TrueSamples were received on ice.
FalseCooler Temperature is acceptable.Cooler temperature outside required temperature
criteria.
TrueCooler Temperature is recorded.9.6°C IR8
TrueCOC is present.
TrueCOC is filled out in ink and legible.
TrueCOC is filled out with all pertinent information.
TrueIs the Field Sampler's name present on COC?
TrueThere are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC.
TrueSamples are received within Holding Time (excluding tests with immediate
HTs)
TrueSample containers have legible labels.
TrueContainers are not broken or leaking.
TrueSample collection date/times are provided.
TrueAppropriate sample containers are used.
TrueSample bottles are completely filled.
N/ASample Preservation Verified.
TrueThere is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested
MS/MSDs
TrueContainers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is
<6mm (1/4").
TrueMultiphasic samples are not present.
TrueSamples do not require splitting or compositing.
N/AResidual Chlorine Checked.
Eurofins Pensacola
Page 33 of 33 12/9/2022
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15