CCB0057_Nash_SwiftCreek_Reuse_StructrualFill_Nov2023GW_FID1838938_20240517

E R M
Water Quality
Monitoring ReportPREPARED FOR
ReUseTecchnology
D ATF
November 2023 March 18, 2024
REFERENCE
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill-CCBOOS7 0397281
;A -ROOM

SIGNATURE PAGE
Water Quality Monitoring Report -November
2023
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill-CCB0057
0397281
Chris Means
Project Manager
ERM NC, Inc.
300 West Summit Avenue
Suite 330
Charlotte, NC 28206
T +01 704 541 8345
Rick Tarravechia, P.G.
Principal in Charge
© Copyright 2024 by The ERM International Group Limited and/or its affiliates ('ERM'). All Rights Reserved.
No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of ERM.
i 1'1 � CLIENT: Reuse Technology
/��I, C K PROJECT NO: 0397281 DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023
INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
CONTENTS
el. INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY _
1.1 INTRODUCTION 3
1.2 SUMMARY OF SITE ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 3
. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
L2.1 HYDROGEOLOGY
2.2 CONTAMINATE FATE AND TRANSPORT
3. WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES
3.1 OBJECTIVES
3.2 MONITORING METHODS
I" MONITORING RESULTS m
4.1 GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS
4.2 SURFACE WATER MONITORING RESULTS
4.3 LABORATORY DATA QUALITY ANALYSIS
�5. SUMMARY
LIST OF TABLES
NO TABLE OF FIGURES ENTRIES FOUND.
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2 SITE MAP AND MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
FIGURE 3 SHALLOW GROUNDWATER POTENTIOMETRIC MAP - NOVEMBER 2023
FIGURE 4 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SAMPLE RESULTS - NOVEMBER 2023
FIGURE 5 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SAMPLE RESULTS - SULFATE - SURFICIAL AQUIFER
FIGURE 6 HYDROGEOLOGIC PROFILE A -A'
FIGURE 7 SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS OVER TIME
5
6
1
7
7
1
9
12
12
ER M PROJEC:TRNO: 0397281Io9Y DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 1

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023
INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER RESULTS
APPENDIX B FIELD DATA SHEETS
APPENDIX C LABORATORY DATA
\\ E R M PROJECT ReUse Io9Y NO: 0397281DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 2

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023 INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
1. INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
1.1 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of ReUse Technology, Inc. (ReUse), ERM NC, Inc. (ERM) has prepared this Water Quality
Monitoring Report to summarize corrective action activities conducted for the Swift Creek Coal
Combustion By -Products (CCBs) Structural Fill site (CCB-0057) located along U.S. Highway 301
north of Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina (hereafter called the "Site" or "subject
property"). Corrective actions have been implemented at the Site to address groundwater quality
impacts in accordance with the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) (ERM, February 27, 2015) approved
by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) on March 12, 2015. The
corrective actions were implemented in 2017 and included temporary removal of CCB materials to
allow raising the floor elevation above the seasonal high groundwater table, placing the CCB
materials on the raised floor in a reduced footprint, installation of a synthetic liner (cap) over the
limits of the CCBs, and drainage improvements to minimize rainfall infiltration. Groundwater and
surface water monitoring activities presented herein are being conducted at the Site to monitor
the effectiveness of the previously completed corrective actions. The Site location is shown in
Figure 1. A Site map is included as Figure 2.
1.2 SUMMARY OF SITE ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY AND CORRECTIVE
ACTION
The Site consists of a 25-acre property in northeast Nash County bounded by US Highway 301 to
the west, Lane Swamp to the north and east, and Swift Creek to the south. The area surrounding
the Site is comprised of sparsely populated agricultural land and partially wooded land. In
December 1991, the Solid Waste Section approved a proposed plan submitted by ReUse to use
CCBs as structural fill material in the development of the Site as a commercial property. In
September 1992, ReUse began placement of CCBs as beneficial use fill at the Site. In January
2003, the last shipment of CCBs was accepted at the Site. In March 2003, the Site had been
graded, compacted, covered with an 18-inch soil cap and planted with grass seed. In December
2003, Full Circle Solutions, Inc. purchased the business assets of ReUse Technology, Inc.,
including the Swift Creek Site. According to records of Full Circle Solutions, Inc., a total of
approximately 134,000 tons of CCBs were placed at the Site. On November 4, 2004, the Closure
Notice was forwarded to the Solid Waste Section.
In August 2004, Sherrill Environmental, Inc. reported the results of groundwater monitoring at
four newly installed monitoring wells (MW-1S/MW-1D, MW-2S/MW-2D) at the Site. Lead and
sulfate were detected at concentrations above the respective groundwater quality standards listed
in Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC), Subchapter 2L .0202 (2L standards), in
shallow groundwater on the east side of the CCB fill. In October 2004, the Solid Waste Section
required an assessment by ReUse to determine the extent of the groundwater impact resulting
from the placement of CCBs at the Site. In March 2006, a Comprehensive Site Assessment for the
Swift Creek Project was submitted to the Solid Waste Section that included the results of an
expanded groundwater and surface water assessment. In September 2006, a Compliance Order
was issued by the Solid Waste Section to ReUse. In December 2006, pursuant to the Compliance
Order, an Assessment Monitoring Plan and a Swift Creek Dewatering Analysis were submitted to
CLIENT: ReUse Technology
fl\ E R M PROJECT NO: 0397281 DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 3

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023
INTRODUCTION AND SITE HISTORY
the Solid Waste Section. The Assessment Monitoring Plan described a proposed groundwater and
surface water monitoring program for the Site. The Swift Creek Dewatering Analysis described a
proposed dewatering subsurface drain along the western boundary of the fill along US Highway
301 to remove water from the coal ash fill and lower the local groundwater table to provide a
required minimum 1-foot vertical separation between coal ash and seasonal high groundwater
elevations. The Assessment Monitoring Plan was approved by the Solid Waste Section in February
2007. The Swift Creek Dewatering Analysis was conditionally approved by the Solid Waste Section
in July 2007 based on the performance of the proposed dewatering plan.
In January 2008, a dewatering subsurface drain was installed consisting of a 6-inch polyvinyl
chloride (PVC) drain pipe along the western boundary of the fill along US Highway 301. The drain
was designed to lower the local groundwater table to provide a required minimum 1-foot vertical
separation between coal ash and seasonal high groundwater elevations. Groundwater collected in
the pipe was transmitted by gravity flow to an outfall box located at the north end of the Site at
Lane Swamp.
The groundwater and surface water monitoring program was initiated at the Site in October 2007
in accordance with the Assessment Monitoring Plan. The program consisted of semi-annual
sampling and laboratory analytical testing for metals and sulfates at eight groundwater monitoring
well locations and three surface water monitoring locations. Groundwater levels were also
measured in the monitoring wells and piezometers in order to evaluate ground water flow
direction and determine water levels relative to the CCB fill. The reported results of the
groundwater monitoring from 2007 to 2014 confirmed groundwater quality impacts including
concentrations of sulfate, arsenic and lead at levels above the respective 2L standards. The
monitoring reported no impacts to surface water quality in Lane Swamp or Swift Creek adjacent to
the Site.
The Division of Waste Management issued a "Warning Notice" to Full Circle Solutions and ReUse
dated May 16, 2014. The notice stated that the required groundwater vertical separation between
filled CCBs and seasonal high groundwater elevations had not been achieved and exceedances of
the 2L standards had been routinely reported. As a result, a "Groundwater Corrective Action
Application" was required to be submitted for approval.
On behalf of Full Circle Solutions and ReUse, ERM submitted a Corrective Action Application, dated
October 16, 2014, to the Division of Waste Management for approval. The Corrective Action
Application proposed the construction of a synthetic liner (cap) and drainage improvements as
corrective actions to significantly reduce or eliminate rainfall infiltration and leachate generation
from the beneficial fill. Two contingency corrective actions also were identified. The Division
issued approval in December 2014 and requested the submittal of a detailed Corrective Action
Plan (CAP) to the Solid Waste Section.
The Corrective Action Plan was submitted in February 2015 and approved by the NCDEQ Solid
Waste Section in March 2015. The Corrective Action Plan was designed to raise existing CCBs to
above historically high groundwater levels to prevent the leaching of contaminants of concern
from the existing CCBs. The CAP included the installation of a protective liner system, cover soil
layer, and drainage outlets to prevent infiltration of precipitation into the CCBs to assist in the
CLIENT: ReUse Technology
fl\ E R M PROJECT NO: 0397281 DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 4

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023
CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
prevention of leaching. The footprint of the limits of ash was condensed from approximately 10
acres to 5 acres, reducing the effective infiltration area. Implementation of the CAP was delayed
approximately one year in 2015-2016 due to a North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) project to realign US Highway 301, along with bridge replacements across Swift Creek.
The corrective measures began on April 24, 2017 and were completed on January 12, 2018.
In June 2018, two new monitoring wells, MW-5RS and MW-5RD, were installed as replacements
for former upgradient wells MW-5S and MW-5D, which were abandoned in 2015 by the NCDOT as
part of the Highway 301 realignment project. The new wells were located hydraulically upgradient
(west) of the Site on the west side of Highway 301 (see Figure 2) to monitor background water
quality in the surficial aquifer (MW-5RS) and deep aquifer (MW-5RD) zones. The monitoring wells
were installed under an NCDOT right-of-way encroachment agreement (E-0420981800025).
In accordance with the CAP, a performance monitoring and reporting plan was implemented in
2018 to monitor the effectiveness of the corrective action. The elements of the performance
monitoring plan include:
• Semi-annual groundwater and surface water monitoring and reporting,
• Quarterly inspection and reporting of the Site for cap structural integrity, erosion control,
proper drainage, etc., and
• Corrective Action Effectiveness Reports prepared every five years to evaluate and document a
reduction in contaminant concentrations in groundwater and a stable or decreasing plume
extent.
2. CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
2.1 HYDROGEOLOGY
The following updated conceptual site model (CSM) has been developed based on the corrective
action and monitoring work performed by ERM, as well as previous site investigation activities
performed by others.
The Site is located in the Coastal Plain physiographic province of North Carolina. The Site surficial
geology consists of alluvial terrace deposits consisting of layers and mixtures of silts, clay, sands
and gravels. The alluvial deposits at the Site range in thickness from approximately 8 to 16 feet.
The shallow groundwater at the Site occurs in the alluvial deposits and is referred to as the
surficial or alluvial aquifer. The alluvial aquifer sands are of low to moderate permeability
(average hydraulic conductivity 0.67 feet/day). Within the alluvial aquifer zone, a yellowish -
brown clay layer was encountered in the majority of the borings for monitoring wells and
piezometers installed at the Site. The clay layer of the alluvial aquifer at the Site is approximately
1 to 4 feet thick and has a low permeability (average hydraulic conductivity 0.002 feet/day). The
clay layer behaves as a confining layer or perching layer, which appears to limit the vertical
migration of contaminants at the Site. On the west (upgradient) edge of the Site, the clay layer
was reported to be absent in the borings for former wells MW-5S, MW-5D, P-23 and P-24. The
alluvial deposits at the Site are underlain by the Yorktown Formation, a regionally extensive
CLIENT: ReUse Technology
fl\ E R M PROJECT NO: 0397281 DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 5

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
marine deposit. The upper Yorktown Formation, consisting typically of greenish -gray, clayey, silty,
shelly, very fine sands, is encountered at the Site from approximately 13 feet below ground
surface (bgs) to the maximum depth of investigation of 35 feet bgs, and has a low permeability
(average of 0.002 feet/day). No groundwater quality impacts have been detected in monitoring
wells completed in the deeper Yorktown aquifer zone.
The general groundwater flow pattern at the Site is controlled largely by two groundwater
discharge features: Lane Swamp to the north and east, and Swift Creek to the south.
Groundwater flow in the area of the Site is generally from west to east with a northeast
component of flow toward Lane Swamp at the north end of the Site, and a southeast component
of flow toward Swift Creek at the south end of the Site.
2.2 CONTAMINATE FATE AND TRANSPORT
The key features of the CSM for contaminant fate and transport are summarized as follows:
• The depth to groundwater ranges from the ground surface at the creeks and swamps to more
than 6 feet bgs in topographically higher areas (not including the beneficial fill footprint).
• The regional groundwater flow regime within the surficial (alluvial) aquifer flows west to east,
with north and south flow components near Swift Creek and Lane Swamp, which serve as
shallow groundwater discharge features.
• The estimated groundwater velocities at the Site are very low. The historical calculated
groundwater velocities are approximately 6 to 27 feet per year for the surficial (alluvial)
aquifer and approximately 0.03 feet per year for the deeper Yorktown aquifer.
• Prior to the 2018 corrective action, seasonal rises of the underlying water table and rainfall
infiltration downward through the old soil cap resulted in water infiltration into the coal ash fill.
Constituents within the coal ash fill were dissolved by the infiltration water and became
mobile. The former infiltration mechanism has been mitigated by the corrective action.
• Once the infiltration water enters the surficial groundwater, it migrates laterally above a clay
confining or perching layer within the alluvial aquifer zone towards the groundwater discharge
features of Lane Swamp and Swift Creek, which serve to limit the lateral extent of the affected
groundwater. The limited lateral extent of the affected groundwater is evident at wells MW-2S
and 2D, located approximately 200 feet east of the former perimeter of the beneficial fill,
where groundwater concentrations are below 2L standards. Similarly, there is no evidence of
affected groundwater to the west (upgradient) as demonstrated by groundwater monitoring
results at current monitoring wells MW-5RS and MW-5RD and former monitoring wells MW-5S
and 5D.
• Based on historical groundwater monitoring results, the groundwater quality impacts at the
Site are limited to the surficial aquifer zone. No groundwater quality impacts are detected in
the deeper aquifer zone of the Yorktown Formation.
• The swamps and creeks surrounding the beneficial fill site act as a "natural perimeter drain"
and intercept the affected groundwater. Based on the historical surface water monitoring
results, there are no surface water quality impacts to Lane Swamp or Swift Creek due to
affected groundwater from the Site.
CLIENT: ReUse Technology
fl\ E R M PROJECT NO: 0397281 DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 6

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023
WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES
3. WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES
3.1 OBJECTIVES
Demonstration of effectiveness of the completed remediation is the primary objective of the water
quality monitoring program (i.e., remedial performance monitoring). This objective is achieved by
monitoring the reduction of the site -specific contaminants of concern (COC) in groundwater,
therefore mitigating the potential for surface water quality impacts due to contaminated
groundwater migration and discharge to surface water.
The applicable preliminary remedial goals for groundwater and surface water are summarized in
the following table.
Compounds
Groundwater
2L Standard'
(mg/L)
Surface Water
2113 Standard2
(mg/L)
Arsenic
0.01
0.15
Barium
0.7
NE
Cadmium
0.002
h
Chromium (Total)
0.01
h
Lead
0.015
0.025
Mercury
0.001
0.000012
Selenium
0.02
0.005
Silver
0.02
0.00006
Sulfate
250
NE
Total Dissolved Solids
500
NE
pH
6.5-8.5
6.0-9.0
I Title 15A NCAC, Subchapter 2L .0202, (April 1, 2022)
z Title 15A NCAC, Subchapter 2B .0200 (2B standards) for Class C Waters (July 26, 2021)
NE = Not Established
mg1L = milligrams per liter
h = hardness dependent dissolved metal standard
Water quality monitoring is conducted in accordance with the NCDEQ-approved Corrective Action
Plan (ERM, March 2015). The following sections summarize the groundwater and surface water
monitoring activities conducted at the Site during the reporting period.
3.2 MONITORING METHODS
A water quality monitoring event was conducted at the Site on November 29-30, 2023.
Groundwater and surface water samples were collected from the following monitoring wells and
surface water locations.
CLIENT: ReUse Technology
fl\ E R M PROJECT NO: 0397281 DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 7

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023
WATER QUALITY MONITORING ACTIVITIES
Monitoring Wells
Surface Water Locations
MW-1S
SW-1
MW-1D
SW-2
MW-2S
SW-3
MW-2D
MW-3
MW-4
M W-5RS
MW-5RD
MW-6
MW-7
MW-8
Subtotal: 11
Subtotal: 3
The monitoring well and surface water locations are shown on Figure 2. Monitoring well
construction details are summarized in Table 1. Surface water location SW-3 was inaccessible
during the sampling event due to the presence of a biological hazard (water moccasin); therefore,
no sample could be collected from this location.
All monitoring wells were gauged for water levels and then purged and sampled by low -flow
purging methods. The surface water samples were collected as grab samples using clean
containers. Field parameters (pH, conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen and oxidation-
reduction potential) were measured for each groundwater and surface water sample by calibrated
meters. Well purge logs were completed for each monitoring well to document the stabilization of
field parameters prior to sample collection. Well purge logs included in the Field Data Sheets
provided in Appendix B. The groundwater and surface water samples were placed in laboratory
supplied containers and placed on ice. The samples were submitted to North Carolina certified
laboratory Pace Analytical Services (NC329) and were analyzed for eight specific metals, sulfates
and total dissolved solids using the analytical methods summarized below:
Analytical Methods
EPA Method
Compound
EPA Method 6010D
EPA Method 7470A
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium (Total)
Lead
Selenium
Silver
Mercury
EPA 300.0 Sulfates
SM 2540 C Total Dissolved Solids
CLIENT: ReUse Technology
fl\ E R M PROJECT NO: 0397281 DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 8

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023
MONITORING RESULTS
4. MONITORING RESULTS
4.1 GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS
Groundwater monitoring activities were conducted at 11 monitoring wells at the Site.
Groundwater depth -to -water gauging and elevation data are presented in Table 2. The
groundwater elevations in the surficial aquifer on November 29, 2023, ranged from 90.13 feet
above mean sea level (ft MSL) at MW-6 located on the east (downgradient) side of the Site to
93.25 ft MSL at MW-4 located on the west (upgradient) side of the Site. The groundwater
elevations are below the base of the CCB fill, which generally ranges from 94 to 99 ft MSL from
east to west. A potentiometric surface map for the surficial (alluvial) aquifer zone for the
November 2023 monitoring event is presented as Figure 3. Groundwater flow in the surficial
aquifer over most of the Site is generally west to east towards Lane Swamp Swift Creek, which
serves as a groundwater discharge zone.
Using the current groundwater elevation data, the hydraulic gradients for the Site were calculated
and are summarized in the following table.
Horizontal Hydraulic Gradients - Shallow Aquifer
29-Nov-23
Well Designation
Head
Head
Distance
Hydraulic
Elevation
Change
Change
Gradient
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
MW-5RS
90.49
0.36
700.00
0.0005
MW-6
90.13
MW-4
93.25
1.59
400.00
0.0040
MW-3
91.66
Average Hydraulic Gradient 0.0022
\ \\ PROJEC�TReUse NO: 0397281Io9Y DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 9
r�„ E RM

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023
MONITORING RESULTS
Vertical Hydraulic Gradients
29-Nov-23
Head
Mid -
Well
Designation
Measurement
Location
Elevation*
Head
Elevation
Head
Change
Point
Length
Change
Hydraulic
Gradient
Up/
Down
(relative ft
ASL)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft/ft)
MW-is
88.84
90.70
-0.11
19.74
-0.0056
Up
MW-1D
69.10
90.81
M W-2S
81.07
90.73
0.13
19.85
0.0065
Down
MW-2D
61.22
90.60
MW-5RS
85.80
90.49
-0.84
19.73
-0.0426
Up
MW-5RD
66.07
91.33
Groundwater seepage velocities were calculated using Darcy's equation, summarized as:
Where:
V=(Kxi)/ne
V = seepage velocity of groundwater in ft/day
K = hydraulic conductivity in ft/day
i = hydraulic gradient (ft/ft)
ne = effective porosity
As summarized below, the estimated groundwater seepage velocity in the surficial aquifer zone
using a primary porosity range of 10-25% is approximately 2 to 4.5 feet per year (ft/yr) based on
the November 2023 hydraulic gradients and the previously calculated mean hydraulic
conductivities.
Seepage Velocity Range (Surficial Aquifer) _
_ (0.55) (0.0022) / (0.25) = 4.92E-03 ft/day
_ (0.55) (0.0022) / (0.10) = 1.23E-02 ft/day
Range 25% 1.80 ft/yr
of
porosity 10% 4.49 ft/yr
Seepage
Velocity Approximate Range of 2 to 4.5 ft/yr
The November 2023 groundwater analytical results are summarized in Table 3 for metals, sulfate
and total dissolved solids (TDS), and in Table 4 for field parameters. Constituents that exceeded
CLIENT: ReUse Technology
fl\ E R M PROJECT NO: 0397281 DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 10

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023
MONITORING RESULTS
2L standards are summarized on Figure 4. Laboratory analytical reports for the sampling event
are provided in Appendix C. A historical groundwater data summary is provided in Appendix A.
For the November 2023 monitoring event, five analytes were detected above their respective NC
2L groundwater standards, as summarized in the following table.
Current Maximum Concentrations in Groundwater — November 2023
Maximum
2L Standards
Analyte
Concentration
(mg/L)
m /L
Cadmium
0.0071
0.002
Chromium
0.0131
0.01
Lead
0.171
0.015
Sulfate
677
250
Total Dissolved
9,330
500
Solids
mg/L = milligrams per liter
Sulfate, a primary indicator analyte for CCB contaminant releases, was detected in groundwater at
concentrations above its 2L standard (250 mg/L) at five of the 11 monitoring wells. The
distribution of sulfate concentrations across the Site is depicted in Figure 5. A hydrogeologic
profile across the Site, including sulfate concentrations in groundwater, is presented in Figure 6.
The highest concentration of sulfate was detected in the groundwater sample collected from
monitoring well MW-6 (677 mg/L) located on the northern side of the Site.
Graphs of sulfate concentrations over time for select monitoring wells are presented in Figure 7.
Since the completion of the corrective action in January 2018, the graphs indicate fluctuating but
overall decreasing sulfate concentration trends at MW-3, MW-6, MW-7 and MW-8, where the most
elevated sulfate levels have historically been observed.
Notably low values of pH were measured in the groundwater samples from MW-6 (3.7), MW-7
(3.8), and MW-8 (4.0). The low pH values at the three wells are consistent with historical
monitoring results, and correlate with detections of lead and sulfate and historical detections of
arsenic, at concentrations above their respective North Carolina 2L groundwater standards at the
three wells.
There were no exceedances of 2L standards in the groundwater samples collected from monitoring
wells MW-5RS and MW-5RD located on the west (upgradient) side of the Site, nor in the sample
collected from monitoring well MW-4, located near the southwest limit of the CCB fill area. The
groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-4 exhibited an exceedance of the 2L
standard for arsenic during the November 2021 monitoring event, which was not consistent with
historical sampling events. The groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-4 during
the May 2023 event was again below the 2L standard for arsenic. Historically, there have been no
detectable levels of arsenic at MW-4 since 2010, with exception of the anomalous result from the
November 2021 event.
On the east side of the Site, sulfate and TDS concentrations exceeded their 2L standards in
groundwater samples collected from MW-1S. The sulfate concentrations exhibit a stable trend in
CLIENT: ReUse Technology
fl\ E R M PROJECT NO: 0397281 DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 11

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023 SUMMARY
groundwater samples collected from MW-1S following completion of the corrective action
activities. All remaining constituent concentrations in samples from the four monitoring wells
located on the east side of the Site (MW-1S, MW-1D, MW-2S and MW-2D) were below their
respective 2L standards with the exception of a concentration of TDS in MW-1D. The elevated TDS
concentration at MW-11D does not appear to be attributable to sulfate or metals, which were below
their respective 2L standards.
Sulfate and TDS concentrations in the groundwater sample collected from well MW-3, which is
located on the central portion of the Site along the southern limit of the CCB fill area, were
detected above their 2L standards, which is consistent with historical monitoring results. Sulfate
concentrations in MW-3 show an overall decreasing trend following completion of the corrective
action activities.
4.2 SURFACE WATER MONITORING RESULTS
Consistent with historical monitoring results, all November 2023 surface water monitoring results
were below the respective North Carolina 213 surface water standards for samples collected from
Swift Creek (SW-1) and Lane Swamp (SW-2). As noted previously, surface water location SW-3
was inaccessible and could not be sampled during the November 2023 monitoring event due to
the presence of a biological hazard. The May 2023 surface water sampling results are summarized
in Table 3. Laboratory analytical reports for the surface water samples are provided in Appendix C.
Historical surface water data is summarized in Appendix A.
4.3 LABORATORY DATA QUALITY ANALYSIS
Quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples collected during the November 2023
groundwater sampling activities included one blind duplicate sample collected at MW-1S. The
duplicate and parent sample results for MW-1S can be compared in Table 3. The analytical results
of the MW-1S and duplicate groundwater samples compare favorably, indicating no analytical
discrepancy.
5. SUMMARY
Corrective actions have been implemented at the Site to address groundwater quality impacts in
accordance with the approved CAP. The corrective actions were completed in January 2018 and
included temporary removal of CCB materials to allow raising the floor foundation above the
seasonal high groundwater table, placing the CCB materials on the raised floor in a reduced
footprint, installation of a synthetic liner (cap) over the limits of the CCBs, and drainage
improvements to minimize rainfall infiltration. Groundwater and surface water monitoring
activities are being conducted at the Site to monitor the effectiveness of the previously completed
corrective actions.
The November 2023 water quality monitoring event was conducted to evaluate groundwater and
surface water quality at the Site approximately six years after corrective action implementation.
Since the completion of the corrective action in 2018, the four monitoring wells (MW-3, MW-6,
MW-7 and MW-8) where the greatest sulfate concentrations in groundwater have historically been
detected continue to exhibit overall decreasing trends as shown in Figure 7. Decreasing sulfate
CLIENT: ReUse Technology
fl\ E R M PROJECT NO: 0397281 DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 12

WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT - NOVEMBER 2023
SUMMARY
concentration trends indicate that the corrective action is effectively mitigating groundwater
quality impacts at the Site. The November 2023 surface water quality results continue to
demonstrate that there have been no surface water impacts to Swift Creek or Lane Swamp due to
discharges of affected groundwater from the Site.
In accordance with the CAP, semi-annual water quality monitoring will continue at the Site, with
the next monitoring event tentatively planned for May 2024.
� E R M ReUse
Io9Y PROJECT NO: 0397281DATE: March 18, 2024 VERSION: 01 Page 13

►lip,,.ERM
TABLES - NOVEMBER 2023

TABLE 1
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Monitoring
Well
Top of
Casing Elev.
ft MSL
Ground
Surface Elev.
ft MSL
Casing Stick
Up
ft MSL
Screen Interval
ft MSL
Total
Depth (TOC)
ft MSL
Status
MW-1 S
99.54
96.8
2.7
3-13
15.7
Active
MW-1 D
99.90
97.1
2.8
23-33
35.7
Active
MW-2S
94.87
92.1
2.8
6-16
18.7
Active
MW-2D
95.22
92.2
3.0
26-36
39.1
Active
MW-3
102.15
99.2
3.0
7-17
20.0
Active
MW-4
106.06
104.1
2.0
8-18
20.0
Active
MW-5S
102.68
99.7
3.0
6-16
17.0
Abandoned
MW-5D
102.67
99.8
2.9
25-35
37.9
Abandoned
MW-5RS
98.80
TBD
Flush Mount
8-18
18.0
Active
MW-5RD
98.57
TBD
Flush Mount
30-35
37.9
Active
MW-6
98.41
95.0
3.4
6-16
19.4
Active
MW-7
98.63
95.1
3.5
6-16
19.5
Active
MW-8
95.42
92.4
3.0
6-16
19.0
Active
Piezometer
P-1
108.19
105.6
2.6
20-30
32.6
Abandoned
P-2
109.53
106.7
2.8
20-30
32.8
Abandoned
P-3
106.18
104.4
1.8
18-28
30.0
Abandoned
P-4
106.57
104.0
2.6
20-30
32.6
Abandoned
P-5
108.39
105.9
2.5
20-30
32.5
Abandoned
P-6
109.79
107.5
2.3
20-30
32.3
Abandoned
P-7
107.77
105.9
1.9
30-40
41.9
Abandoned
P-8
106.53
103.9
2.6
30-40
42.6
Abandoned
P-9
103.32
100.9
2.4
20-30
32.4
Abandoned
P-10
108.17
106.1
2.1
20-30
32.1
Abandoned
P-11
101.88
99.2
2.7
13-23
25.7
Abandoned
P-12
107.04
104.0
3.0
6-16
19.0
Abandoned
P-13
108.99
105.9
3.1
6-16
19.1
Abandoned
P-14
105.38
101.9
3.5
4-14
17.5
Abandoned
P-15
103.76
101.0
2.8
4-14
16.8
Abandoned
P-16
105.28
102.1
3.2
4-14
17.2
Abandoned
P-17
105.31
101.8
3.5
4-14
17.5
Abandoned
P-18
111.21
107.5
3.7
5-15
18.7
Abandoned
P-19
111.86
108.3
3.6
7-17
20.6
Abandoned
P-20
107.00
104.2
2.8
7-17
19.8
Abandoned
P-21
104.99
99.5
5.5
4.5-11.5
16.5
Abandoned
P-22
103.60
101.8
1.8
17-27
28.8
Abandoned
P-23East
109.75
107.1
2.7
9-19
21.8
Abandoned
P-24West
103.17
101.1
2.1
3-13
15.3
Abandoned
B-1
107.66
105.7
2.0
14-19
21.0
Abandoned
Notes
TOC - top of casing
ft MSL - feet above mean sea level

TABLE 2
HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
SWIFT CREEK - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Depth
Elevation
Gauging Date
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
ft BTOC
ft MSL
Well Identification
MWAS
MAD
MW-2S
MW-21)
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-513
MW-6
MW-7
MW-8
MW-5RS
MW-5RD
Lane Swamp
TOC Elevation (ft MSL):
99.54
99.90
94.87
95.22
102.15
106.06
102.68
102.67
98.41
98.63
95.42
98.80
98.57
92.25
TOC Stickup (Ft from GL)
2.7
2.8
2.8
3.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
2.9
3.4
3.5
3.0
-
-
N/A
Screened Interval (Ft BGL)
3-13
23-33
6-16
26-36
7-17
8-18
6-16
25-35
6-16
6-16
6-16
8-18
30-35
N/A
Geologic Zone Screened
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Deep (Yorktown)
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Deep (Yorktown)
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Surficial
Deep (Yorktown)
N/A
12-Jan-2005
8.21
91.33
8.57
91.33
4.72
90.15
4.7
90.52
9.65
92.50
11.24
94.82
6.01 96.67
6.4 96.27
7.17
91.24
7.63
91.00
NM
1-Aug-2006
8.11
91.43
8.28
91.62
NM
--
NM
--
9.48
92.67
10.15
95.91
5.86 96.82
5.68 96.99
7.18
91.23
7.74
90.89
NM
--
6-Sep-2006
8.69
90.85
9.05
90.85
4.83
90.04
4.87
90.35
10.32
91.83
11.41
94.65
6.94 95.74
6.84 95.83
7.74
90.67
8.66
89.97
NM
--
4-Apr-2007
7.80
91.74
8.18
91.72
4.4
90.47
4.75
90.47
9.31
92.84
9.96
96.10
6.12 96.56
5.96 96.71
7.28
91.13
7.8
90.83
4.84
90.58
--
-
21-Aug-2007
10.89
88.65
11.30
88.60
6.77
88.10
6.82
88.40
11.4
90.75
13.28
92.78
9.57 93.11
9.42 93.25
10.8
87.61
10.71
87.92
7.67
87.75
-
--
21-Oct-2007
11.40
88.14
11.76
88.14
7.31
87.56
7.43
87.79
12.98
89.17
14.06
92.00
10.62 92.06
10.63 92.04
11.9
86.51
11.41
87.22
8.3
87.12
-
--
31-Jan-2008
9.13
90.41
9.42
90.48
4.86
90.01
5.02
90.20
10.7
91.45
14.11
91.95
7.65 95.03
8.11 94.56
8.44
89.97
8.71
89.92
5.57
89.85
--
--
22-Mar-2008
8.10
91.44
8.44
91.46
4.4
90.47
4.54
90.68
9.18
92.97
13.28
92.78
6.98 95.70
7.34 95.33
7.18
91.23
7.79
90.84
4.78
90.64
--
2.51
89.74
9-Apr-2008
9.26
90.28
9.47
90.43
4.58
90.29
5.02
90.20
10.98
91.17
14.82
91.24
10.87 91.81
10.72 91.95
8.92
89.49
9.06
89.57
5.97
89.45
-
--
3.1
89.15
17-Jun-2008
9.12
90.42
9.42
90.48
5.03
89.84
5.23
89.99
10.54
91.61
14.05
92.01
8.93 93.75
8.92 93.75
8.36
90.05
9.06
89.57
6.09
89.33
-
--
3.2
89.05
13-Jan-2009
8.22
91.32
8.55
91.35
4.26
90.61
4.46
90.76
9.35
92.80
13.41
92.65
7.16 95.52
7.54 95.13
7.02
91.39
7.6
91.03
4.58
90.84
-
--
2.52
89.73
31-Mar-2009
7.60
91.94
7.96
91.94
4.36
90.51
4.38
90.84
6.74
95.41
12.43
93.63
5.98 96.70
6.22 96.45
6.81
91.60
7.2
91.43
4.21
91.21
--
2.5
89.75
23-Jun-2009
8.62
90.92
8.92
90.98
4.41
90.46
4.77
90.45
10.06
92.09
13.86
92.20
9.83 92.85
9.63 93.04
7.72
90.69
8.52
90.11
5.56
89.86
-
--
2.9
89.35
30-Sep-2009
8.86
90.68
9.18
90.72
4.64
90.23
5.00
90.22
10.82
91.33
14.7
91.36
10.4 92.28
10.26 92.41
8.08
90.33
8.51
90.12
5.5
89.92
-
--
3.15
89.10
15-Dec-2009
7.54
92.00
NM
--
4.22
90.65
NM
--
8.68
93.47
12.85
93.21
6.3 96.38
NM --
6.78
91.63
7.13
91.50
4.21
91.21
--
2.6
89.65
31-Mar-2010
7.37
92.17
7.74
92.16
2.42
92.45
4.46
90.76
8.64
93.51
12.52
93.54
5.8 96.88
6.19 96.48
6.77
91.64
7.93
90.70
3.96
91.46
-
2.14
90.11
29-Jun-2010
9.35
90.19
NM
--
4.94
89.93
NM
--
10.66
91.49
14.62
91.44
9.97 92.71
NM --
9.21
89.20
9.25
89.38
6.31
89.11
-
--
3.35
88.90
28-Sep-2010
9.23
90.31
10.05
89.85
4.8
90.07
5.50
89.72
11.55
90.60
14.8
91.26
10.85 91.83
11.1 91.57
9.11
89.30
8.52
90.11
5.48
89.94
-
--
4.1
88.15
13-Dec-2010
8.54
91.00
NM
--
4.36
90.51
NM
--
10.12
92.03
14.02
92.04
8.72 93.96
NM --
7.37
91.04
7.93
90.70
4.81
90.61
-
--
2.02
90.23
28-Mar-2011
8.03
91.51
8.42
91.48
4.35
90.52
4.67
90.55
9.17
92.98
13.32
92.74
7.45 95.23
7.84 94.83
7.25
91.16
7.53
91.10
4.42
91.00
--
-
--
2.85
89.40
26-Jun-2011
10.05
89.49
10.35
89.55
6.02
88.85
6.32
88.90
11.23
90.92
14.82
91.24
10.59 92.09
10.43 92.24
9.2
89.21
9.98
88.65
7.04
88.38
-
-
--
2.85
89.40
28-Sep-2011
7.84
91.70
NM
--
4.24
90.63
NM
--
8.9
93.25
13.09
92.97
7.62 95.06
NM --
7.13
91.28
7.71
90.92
4.83
90.59
-
--
--
-
2.2
90.05
18-Dec-2011
8.00
91.54
8.35
91.55
4.32
90.55
4.65
90.57
8.88
93.27
13.1
92.96
7.35 95.33
7.7 94.97
6.98
91.43
7.53
91.10
4.47
90.95
-
--
--
1.8
90.45
23-Mar-2012
8.01
91.53
8.35
91.55
4.31
90.56
4.56
90.66
8.89
93.26
13.01
93.05
7.35 95.33
7.66 95.01
7.03
91.38
7.75
90.88
4.8
90.62
-
--
-
1.65
90.60
28-Jun-2012
8.39
91.15
8.72
91.18
4.65
90.22
4.92
90.30
9.4
92.75
13.38
92.68
8.52 94.16
8.54 94.13
7.42
90.99
8.45
90.18
5.63
89.79
-
--
-
1.95
90.30
18-Sep-2012
7.41
92.13
7.86
92.04
4.16
90.71
4.5
90.72
8.21
93.94
12.73
93.33
7.21 95.47
7.45 95.22
6.82
91.59
7.37
91.26
4.51
90.91
--
-
1.52
90.73
17-Dec-2012
8.04
91.50
8.44
91.46
NM
--
NM
--
9.19
92.96
13.36
92.70
8.55 94.13
8.76 93.91
6.82
91.59
7.37
91.26
4.51
90.91
-
--
1.45
90.80
26-Mar-2013
7.87
91.67
8.13
91.77
4.23
90.64
4.46
90.76
8.71
93.44
12.84
93.22
7.03 95.65
7.38 95.29
7.08
91.33
7.26
91.37
4.22
91.20
-
--
2.05
90.20
12-Apr-2013
8.30
91.24
8.59
91.31
4.31
90.56
4.72
90.50
9.59
92.56
14.13
91.93
8.48 94.20
8.7 93.97
7.47
90.94
7.8
90.83
4.82
90.60
-
-
2.85
89.40
25-Jun-2013
8.00
91.54
8.34
91.56
4.18
90.69
4.57
90.65
9.05
93.10
12.97
93.09
6.92 95.76
7.44 95.23
7.05
91.36
7.7
90.93
4.69
90.73
-
-
2.45
89.80
26-Sep-2013
8.38
91.16
8.67
91.23
4.32
90.55
4.71
90.51
9.57
92.58
13.65
92.41
9.5 93.18
9.5 93.17
8.75
89.66
8.19
90.44
5.25
90.17
--
3.05
89.20
28-Mar-2014
7.74
91.80
8.03
91.87
4.33
90.54
4.54
90.68
8.56
93.59
12.53
93.53
6.68 96.00
7.03 95.64
6.92
91.49
7.23
91.40
4.39
91.03
-
1.85
90.40
27-Jun-2014
8.43
91.11
8.74
91.16
4.45
90.42
4.8
90.42
9.69
92.46
13.93
92.13
7.78 94.90
8.8 93.87
8.33
90.08
8.54
90.09
5.6
89.82
-
--
2.95
89.30
26-Sep-2014
7.82
91.72
8.20
91.70
3.91
90.96
4.28
90.94
8.62
93.53
13.81
92.25
6.68 96.00
7.33 95.34
7.1
91.31
7.36
91.27
4.4
91.02
--
1.95
90.30
17-Dec-2014
7.88
91.66
8.30
91.60
4.22
90.65
4.53
90.69
9.01
93.14
13.71
92.35
7.94 94.74
7.46 95.21
7.24
91.17
7.4
91.23
4.34
91.08
--
2.1
90.15
28-Jun-2018
9.36
90.18
9.55
90.35
4.56
90.31
4.96
90.26
10.35
91.80
11.65
94.41
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.68
89.73
9.12
89.51
5.86
89.56
6.84
91.96
10.52
88.05
22-Jan-2019
8.68
90.86
9.14
90.76
3.8
91.07
4.55
90.67
9.71
92.44
11.24
94.82
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
7.78
90.63
7.93
90.70
4.93
90.49
6.59
92.21
5.75
92.82
--
17-Jun-2019
8.90
90.64
10.16
89.74
4.06
90.81
4.56
90.66
10.54
91.61
11.96
94.10
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.19
90.22
8.55
90.08
5.35
90.07
6.98
91.82
8.95
89.62
9-Mar-2020
8.66
90.88
8.99
90.91
3.95
90.92
4.45
90.77
9.74
92.41
11.26
94.80
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
7.79
90.62
8.08
90.55
4.61
90.81
5.81
92.99
6.01
92.56
9-Nov-2020
8.65
90.89
8.80
91.10
3.73
91.14
4.27
90.95
9.98
92.17
11.56
94.50
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
7.8
90.61
8.2
90.43
4.89
90.53
5.7
93.10
6.03
92.54
25-Mar-2021
8.52
91.02
8.82
91.08
3.8
91.07
4.35
90.87
9.61
92.54
11.3
94.76
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
7.61
90.80
7.5
91.13
NM
NM
5.88
92.92
5.28
93.29
1-Nov-2021
8.77
90.77
9.44
90.46
4.21
90.66
4.72
90.50
10.91
91.24
12.94
93.12
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.52
89.89
8.7
89.93
5.36
90.06
7.31
91.49
7.35
91.22
--
22-Mar-2022
8.63
90.91
9.15
90.75
4.19
90.68
4.65
90.57
9.99
92.16
11.56
94.50
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.09
90.32
8.45
90.18
5.05
90.37
6.92
91.88
5.79
92.78
19-Oct-2022
9.11
90.43
10.38
89.52
4.24
90.63
5.24
89.98
10.95
91.20
13.11
92.95
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.63
89.78
8.71
89.92
5.41
90.01
6.85
91.95
7.53
91.04
23-May-2023
8.70
90.84
9.12
90.78
4.13
90.74
4.61
90.61
10.15
92.00
11.53
94.53
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
8.34
90.07
8.69
89.94
5.35
90.07
7.94
90.86
5.25
93.32
28-Nov-2023
8.84
90.70
9.09
90.81
4.14
90.73
4.62
90.60
10.49
91.66
12.81
93.25
Abandoned 2015
Abandoned 2015
1 8.28
90.13
8.49
90.14
5.17
90.25
8.31
90.49
7.24
91.33
NE - Not Established
-- = Not Measured
BTOC = Below Top of Casing BGL - Below ground level
ft MSL = feet above Mean Sea Level TOC Stickup data per Sherrill Environmental, Assessment Montoring Report , Feb 10, 2015 10-7-20 Note: Historical GW elevation values corrected for MW-3
Page 2 of 4
RJRPDRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.x1sA2. GW Elevations

TABLE 3
GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL SAMPLE RESULTS
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 3 of 4
370
Date
D
Cl)
0
W
°�
C'
B
n
a
C
3
s
o
N E
, B
r
Q
m
c
Z
Cn
m
C'
S
Cn
<
cn
N
0
cn
a o
Q< Cl) O
Cn Q m
NC 2L Groundwater Standard
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
NC 2B Surface Water Standard
0.15
NE
h
h
0.025
0.000012
0.005
0.00006
NE
NE
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELLS
MW-1S
11/29/23
<0.01
0.188
0.00095
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
401
5,000
FD-01 (MW-1S)
11/29/23
<0.01
0.188
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
402
6,450
MW-1D
11/29/23
<0.01
0.644
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
15.6
880
MW-2S
11/29/23
<0.01
0.140
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
3.7
255
MW-2D
11/29/23
<0.01
0.303
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
1.3
300
MW-3
11/29/23
<0.01
0.0632
0.0015
<0.005
0.0179
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
492
1,350
MW-4
11/29/23
<0.01
0.149
.00064 J
0.0131
0.0331
0.00074
.0053 J
<0.005
20.1
260
MW-5RS
11/29/23
<0.01
0.086
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
2.6
183
MW-5RD
11/29/23
<0.01
0.185
<0.01
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
10.5
189
MW-6
11/29/23
<0.05
0.0697
<0.025
0.0552
<0.0002
<0.075
<0.025
677
5,420
MW-7
11/29/23
<0.05
0.111
0.0071
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.075
<0.025
657
9,330
MW-8
1 11/29/23
<0.05
0.096
.0046 J
I <0.025
0.143
<0.0002
<0.075
<0.025
6011
6,690
SURFACE WATER
SW-01
11/28/23
<0.01
0.0426
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
11.4
120
SW-02
11/29/23
<0.01
0.0267
<0.005
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
6.3
165
SW-03
11/28/23
<0.01
0.0319
<0.005
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
6.0
91
All concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L) unless
otherwise noted.
--- Not sampled
NE - Not established
Bold with gray background indicates exceedance of NC Groundwater or Surface Water Standard
h = hardness dependent dissolved metal standard
H - Out of holding time
E - Quantitation of compound exceeded calibration range
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table 3-Event Data 2023-11

TABLE 4
GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER FIELD PARAMETER RESULTS
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 4of4
Sample
Location / ID
Date
a
=
CD_0
3
n Q a
n v
3' m
V
3°
s a
N
<
3
s
C LI
v
°
CD
x O
m x
v Q 9
0 p'
<
p
O n
3,< o
cQ <
v Q
NC 2L Groundwater Standard
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NC 213 Surface Water Standard
6.0 - 9.0
NE
NE
50
NE
>5.0
GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELLS
MW-is
11/29/23
5.6
14.2
10,587
3.9
5.6
3.57
MW-1D
11/29/23
5.1
14.8
1,298
2.3
29.6
0.05
MW-2S
11/29/23
6.8
14.5
427
4.1
-117
0.04
MW-2D
11/29/23
7.2
13.2
526
3.3
-99.9
0.79
MW-3
11/29/23
5.5
9.9
2,088
6.8
176.1
0.57
MW-4
11/29/23
6.5
13.9
519
266.0
-19.9
0.81
MW-5RS
11/29/23
6.6
16.1
406
1.5
181.9
1.00
MW-5RD
11/29/23
7.3
12.8
349
7.5
-21.9
0.47
MW-6
11/29/23
3.7
12.9
8,351
2.1
273
6.48
MW-7
11/29/23
3.8
13.9
15,440
14.8
287
0.30
MW-8
11/29/23
4.0
14.3
8,020
34.2
260
0.27
SURFACE WATER
SW-01
11/28/23
6.6
12.3
178
29.8
25
8.18
SW-02
11/29/23
6.4
5.3
628
14.6
16
2.27
SW-03
11/28/23
6.6
8.9
129
29.8
0.1
6.98
NE - Not established
Bold value outside of pH standard range
pmhos/cm -micromhos per centimeter
NTU - Nephelometric Turbidity unit
my - millivolt
mg/L - milligram per liter
n/a - not applicable
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table 4-Field Parameters2023-11

►lip,,.ERM
FIGURES - NOVEMBER 2023

m f Mann ■ v _ 0 1/.' \
D I Waetb Wbitakaea N
8ch ' ". SubStattan q
! Cem
' T k �iltakers
• 4• It
- � r i?6 di f s �� i� i•
em ■J� r
v3\.,
.'a K E R'1
fr ' ryp yy
�� � r � 1 � � 1 � �41 [` • i �_l� ��- ! 1 l � •' yam• •
127. °
w rIt
r }EruS;lem °a _.
Gem
lat+ e� rJJ Si �� N i♦ I� - ,'=Cem
a;�� ' r�p ', • Y ;t,'.. % r� --� r r a its np C I' _.!
a ``� r • •' •p ns .,� r ti _ r� _ , . �� r1 `.•�. <�-`'•`.. lie
Il9 • f f 1 - .
• - ■CSC t R !� f �t = .- : r ■ _p :r y
; ir
►3a_
+�+• k t x 9 r
It
41
,� ♦'M
Ali
+ err t +� .► + - - w f + + 4 - �"" _ T- + ^+ + - - ' +s ^,r - ; �, + a ^ +
AII
7 � T T ._ � y. — �, i� � M yF —" � J► - +i M 'r �! _ F � + �►—� �'� �^ rt may' + F � +. � � ��
T T F +r + ►f F.F T '� T TF = —F T+ + F T
t � �!T � t� _'�`. + + +-F F i- T+� +• F -T T F � �f + r r A yN Y r
E• - F - _ - ~ - + '� F - F F F _F _ T T'-- {� _ '� ;1v .' T �.^ + .� F _ T T T k $Al
_
El-
n � - .ram � Y _ � - r+ yM ■�yC� + �+ ++ + _ r-� r .1 �� ~�� •. �� � " 8 e
IN
Z.
71
OF E-
01
V.
• T � _ p
� � 1 r/ ii� i � ■ l�i � i � _ ■ 1} � 1r 1 � -
-
" I�� � �9' • ter# �
P s♦ ?� �¢ 4l 1 r Tr -may"`_^ _
it
V� e —• ` i
K •IF
sue
' •+
• �, a ttleboro 4 . ' ; Battleboro s
2 ■ - II am 136 ► -
m �1�� y t�sa •. j - i - .
_ S s � L
0 1,000 2,000 �► �Cem , �• s
023
Feet
Legend N Figure 1
n 0 Site Site Location Map
V ReUse Technology, Inc.
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
n o 1,800 3,600 Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
n
D Feet
1
n 1:24,000 1 inch = 2,000 feet �1 _,I F P M
�� •■rig.
Source: Esri - World Topoqraphic Map; NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

MW-5RS�—MW=5RD� `�
SW-1
SVN�3
[Al
Legend
Notes:
Figure 2
CCB - Coal Combustion By -Products
Site Map and Monitoring Well Locations
t Shallow Monitoring Well
Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals)
Reuse Technology, Inc.
L
y
• Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well
Wetland
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
o
$ Deep Monitoring Well
Freshwater Pond
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
"g
Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well
Riverine
oA
Surface Water Monitoring Location
o_ Site
I
•!%"
E
R
M
Z 0 0.125 0.25 0. Miles
Cniir r—i - \ —1.1 Tnnnnn kir M.—
N4h 10R7 Cf.f.Dl­
CCB Structural Fill Boundary
North r—ii— FTDC 'Z)nn Fcc4
• 1 I1�� .

SW-1
� MW-05RS
� 90.49
MW=05S
Abandoned MW-05RD
MW=05D 91'.33*
_
J1 MW-06
90-1-3
if
Il �
Vl �
I'1 ■
1� �M�Wt03
9166� J ■■
� � _ 907.0 ■
MW=01D .
MW'07
■ ■ 90.14
MW-02D MW-02S
90.60* `90.73 MW-08
90.25
r
■
■
4
L1 S W=3
N 0 180 360
� II
m
F
o -
0
Feet
[AlLegend
Notes:
Figure 3
v
-U�hir.F
t Shallow Monitoring Well
Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals)
Groundwater elevation measurements collected 29
Shallow Groundwater Potentiometric Map
a
November 2023.
November 2023
L
• Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well
Wetland
90.70 - Groundwater Elevation in Shallow
Reuse Technology Inc.
o
$ Deep Monitoring Well
[ Freshwater Pond
Monitoring Well
90.81 Groundwater Elevation in Deep
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
"g
Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well
Riverine
Monitoring Well (not contoured)
Battleboro, Nash Count North Carolina
Ln
A Surface Water Monitoring Location
Potentiometric Surface Contour
Elevations in feet above mean sea level
Ln
�,
Q Site
— - Inferred Potentionmetric Surface Contour
CCB - Coal Combustion By -Products
In
o o.izs o.zs o.s
N Miles
5
I CCB Structural Fill Boundary
Apparent Groundwater Flow Direction
Source: Esri - World Topooqraphic Map; NAD 1983 StatePlane
North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

is
SW-1
None Exceed
MW-4
11/29/2023
Chromium 0.013
Lead 0.033
r
l
MW-5S
' M W-5 RS
1-- None Exceed
7-7-7
MW-5RD
None Exceed
MW-6
11/29/2023
Lead 0.055
Sulfate 677
Dissolved Solids, Total 5,420 Gad .
MW-3f��
\`
11/29/2023
Lead 0.018
f
Sulfate 492
MW-7
Dissolved Solids, Total 1350
11/29/2023
.-_
Cadmium 0.007
$
MW-1S
Lead 0.171
I1/29/2023
�= "�_
Sulfate 657
Sulfate 401
Dissolved Solids, Total 9,330
Dissolved Solids, Total 5,000
MW-2D
MW-1D
None Exceed
11/29/2023
MW-8
Dissolved Solids, Total 880
SW-2
MW-2S
11/29/2023
None Exceed
None Exceed
Cadmium 0.0053
Lead 0.143
-
-
y
Sulfate 601 M 1
Dissolved Solids, Total 6,690
SW-3
None Exceed
DI
0 150 300
z Feet
Y
N
U/
3 [Ai
Legend Figure 4
2
Shallow Monitoring Well Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals) Notes: Groundwater Analytical Sample Results -Constituents Ex seeding
Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well Wetland Groundwater elevation measurements 2L Groundwater Standards — November 2023
collected 29 November 2023. ReUse Technology, Inc.
$ Deep Monitoring Well W1 Freshwater Pond
0 880 -Groundwater sample concentration in Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
$ Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well monitoring well Battleboro Nash Coun�,c rth Carolina
y Surface Water Monitoring Location Riverine g
Concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Q Site Only Concentrations that exceed applicable �y,IE R M
o o.�25 0.25 0.5 y�� CCB Structural Fill Boundar regulatory standards are shown !%//I��\\
Miles Y CCB -Coal Combustion By -Products
Source: Esri - World Topooqraphic Map; NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

■
■
MW=04f
MW-05RS MW-05RD
01
15 ��ee
MW-02D
SW-02- MW-02S
3 3.7 .,
■ r O
MW-06
■
■
■
■
MW'07
SW-03
6
-,_-.
0 180 360
Feet
[AlLegend
Notes:
Figure 5
v
2
t Shallow Monitoring Well
Topographic Contour (1-ft intervals)
Groundwater elevation measurements collected
Groundwater Analytical Sample Results — Sulfate
29 November 2023.
Surficial Aquife
L
Abandoned Shallow Monitoring Well
Wetland
677 - Sulfate groundwater sample concentration
Reuse Technology, Inc.
$ Deep Monitoring Well
[� Freshwater Pond
in monitoring well
Concentration in milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
Abandoned Deep Monitoring Well
Riverine
Battleboro, Nash Count North Carolina
����'
oA
Surface Water Monitoring Location
Sulfate Isoconcentration Contour
Q Site
— Inferred Sulfate Isoconcentration Contour
I
E
R
M
V 0 0.125 0.25!!%
CCB Structural Fill Boundary
• 1 I1�� .

Notes:
Vertical Exaggeration = 10:1
1 inch = 150 feet
s
A
Isn
140
130
120
80
70
60
50
0
, Maxar,
(92.00) Groundwater Elevation
657 Sulfate Concentration (mg/L)
Groundwater Elevation
A (November 2023)
Well Details
150
_ Casing
F=� Screen
140 Subsurface Details
Existing Clay Layer from Boring
Logs (Alluvial)
130
120
110
100
90
80
MW-5S
- ---
A
tiM�`W-4
MW-3
M W-,, S
MW-2S
0
325
650
Feet
70
60
50
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700
Distance (ft)
W T..�
Figure 6
Hydrogeologic Profile A -A'
ReUse Technology, Inc.
Swift Creek CCB Structural Fill - CCB0057
Battleboro, Nash County, North Carolina
Environmental Resources Management
www.erm.com ERM
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina FIPS 3200 Feet

FIGURE 7 - SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS OVER TIME
SWIFT CREEK CCB FILL SITE
BATTLEBORO, NASH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
800
700
600
500
400
300
200 ,
100
0
'cl- Ln W I, n 00 Ol O r-I N N M 'zT Ln W I, n 00 Ol O r-1 N N M
> C > Q T C > Q75? C > Q >- C > Q
Sulfate • • • • • • Poly. (Sulfate)
1[l/l�i�
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Ln W 1, 00 00 M 0 r-1 .-1 N M v Ln W I, I, 00 M O O —1 N M M
O O O O O O N N N N N N
U Q c i U Q c i U Q c i U Q c i U Q c i U Q c i U
of c) m OJ a) OJ 4J W a) OJ a) of a) m OJ
O N Ln 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 Ln O N
Sulfate • • • • • • Poly. (Sulfate)
0
1200
1000
800
600
400 „
200
0
Ln LO I, oo oo m O c-I r-I N M -zi- zt Ln LO I, n oo a) O O r-I N M M
O O O O O O .-i r� 1� r� 1i .-i 1i 11 r- 1� N N N N N N
U 0-C U 0-a U 0-C U 0-C U 0-C U 0-C U
0 N 0 V) 0 N 0 Ln in V) 0 V)
Sulfate • • • • • • Poly. (Sulfate)

FIGURE 7 - SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS OVER TIME
SWIFT CREEK CCB FILL SITE
BATTLEBORO, NASH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MW-7
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
100
200
100
0
V1 lD I, w w m O c-I r-1 N M -zl* -It V1 lD I- n w m O O "q N M M
V 0.c U Q c U p. U p. U p_ U Q
O VN VN 0 to 0 cN 0 VI O V) 0
Sulfate • • • • • • Poly. (Sulfate)
1200
1000
800
600
400 ..
200
0
MW-8
I, W W M O O -1 N N M V M lD LD I, W W M O O .--I N N M
O O O O ci i-V 1i ci i-V 1i ci i-V 1i ci 1l 1i ci i-V ci N N rV N N N
T C Q T C Q T C Q T C Q T C Q T C Q T C Q T C Q T
(6 f6 aJ C c6 aJ c c6 aJ m c6 aJ c c6 a) c c6 a) r t6 a) r t6 a) (9
2 LO 2 Ln 2 Ln 2 Ln 2 N 2 N 2 V) 2 V) :E
Sulfate • • • • • • Poly. (Sulfate)

►lip,,.ERM
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER AND
SURFACE WATER RESULTS
NOVEMBER 2023

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 1 of 10
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
3.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
CD
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
`D
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m
N m
c' C
m
30
S a
o c
n <'
Z s
C Q
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v Q Q
v
0 p'
< 0
0
Cn
O
n
O
.�
cc (�
vCD
CD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Jul-04
0.028
0.19
<0.001
<0.01
0.068
<0.01
<0.01
490
MW-is
Dec-05
0.02
0.17
<0.001
<0.01
0.042
<0.01
<0.01
608
Oct-06
0.012
0.472
<0.001
<0.01
0.052
0.00064
<0.01
<0.01
740
May-07
<0.01
0.458
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
0.00047
<0.01
<0.01
420
Nov-07
<0.01
0.529
<0.001
<0.01
0.031
0.00089
<0.01
<0.01
520
Jun-08
<0.01
0.619
<0.001
<0.01
0.011
0.00051
<0.01
<0.01
470
Jan-09
<0.01
0.416
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
210
Jun-09
<0.01
0.412
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
220
Dec-09
<0.01
0.256
0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
0.022
<0.01
160
Jun-10
0.012
0.691
0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
280
Dec-10
<0.01
0.599
0.003
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
400
Jun-11
<0.10
0.475
<0.01
<0.10
<0.10
<0.00028
<0.10
<0.10
590
Dec-11
<0.050
0.422
<0.005
<0.050
<0.050
<0.0002
<0.050
<0.050
170
Jun-12
<0.01
0.419
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
150
Dec-12
0.018
0.567
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
180
Jun-13
<0.01
0.174
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
75
Dec-13
<0.01
0.163
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
99
Jun-14
<0.01
0.25
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
110
Dec-14
<0.01
0.408
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
310
Jun-18
<0.015
0.24
<0.005
<0.030
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
320
8,100
5.8
27.0
14,679
5
47
0.18
Jan-19
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
270
4,700
6.0
6.4
4,305
7
4
0.53
Jun-19
<0.015
0.28
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
320
7,400
5.8
21.4
11,617
9
-51
0.19
Mar-20
<0.015
0.22
<0.005
<0.01
0.03
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
480
8,500
6.0
17.0
14,566
5
2
0.25
Nov-20
<0.015
0.26
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
400
8,500
5.6
23.8
8,023
2
-116
0.43
Mar-21
<0.015
0.23
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
430
6,200
6.1
16.1
10,125
8
-80
0.41
Duplicate (FD-01)
Mar-21
<0.015
0.22
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
430
6,100
--
--
--
--
--
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
380
6,800
5.8
20.2
10,278
4.5
-27
0.31
Duplicate (FD-01)
Nov-21
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
0.031
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
410
7,000
--
--
--
--
--
Mar-22
<0.015
0.19
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
500
5,100
5.8
15.4
7,670.0
8.2
-7.1
0.0
Duplicate (FD-01)
Mar-22
<0.015
0.19
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
510
5,400
-
--
--
--
--
Oct-22
<0.015
0.26
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
370
7,500
5.6
16.9
13,200.0
3.2
-54.0
0.3
Duplicate (FD-01)
Oct-22
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
340
6,900
--
--
--
--
-
May-23
<0.03
0.104
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
622
4,320
6.2
17.9
6,298
9.4
-9.5
0.61
Duplicate (FD-01)
May-23
<0.03
0.111
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
654
4,420
Nov-23
<0.01
0.188
0.00095 J
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
401
5,000
5.6
14.2
10,587
3.9
5.6
3.57
Duplicate (FD-01)
Nov-23
<0.01
0.188
0.00093 J
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
402
6,450
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 2 of 10
o
0
N
CD
N 3
Cn
O
C�
n
cn
(
30
CD
70 O
n
D
W
n
S
o
m
�
cn
NO
�"� -o
m o
S a
o c
Z
CD X
v o o
O
Sample
N
°'
�.
3
�.
O 3
r
�
C
N
CD
Q
N m
C
�
n
s
0 9
--^.
Location / ID
Date
3
C'
v
3
n
C'
3
<
m
m
cn
-o
2
c'
S, m
v
<
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Jul-04
<0.01
0.54
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
13
MW-1D
Dec-05
<0.01
0.36
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.7
Oct-06
<0.01
0.341
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
20
May-07
<0.01
0.343
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
Oct-07
<0.01
0.365
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
11
Jun-08
<0.01
0.334
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
Jan-08
<0.01
0.356
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
14
Jun-09
<0.01
0.403
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
20
Jun-18
<0.01
0.66
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
19
8,200
6.9
25.6
1,221
3
-93
0.18
Jan-19
<0.01
0.67
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
17
750
6.9
8.9
1,165
7
-46
0.85
Jun-19
<0.01
0.66
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
13
800
6.8
22.4
1,374
11
-56
0.23
Mar-20
<0.01
0.67
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
13
730
7.0
18.2
1,344
9
11
1.97
Nov-20
<0.01
0.6
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
16
810
6.9
24.4
1,304
2
-68
0.40
Mar-21
<0.01
0.59
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
15
780
7.1
20.9
1,229
10
94
1.78
Nov-21
<0.015
0.027
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
16
720
7.0
20.4
1,205
1
-41
0.97
Mar-22
<0.015
0.63
<0.005
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
14
710
7.0
17.5
1,260
5
76
1.05
Oct-22
<0.015
0.63
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
14
810
7.2
18.4
1,350
5
-45
1.42
May-23
<0.03
0.6
<0.001
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
17.6
880
6.9
19.8
1,460
1
-50
0.32
Nov-23
<0.01
0.644
<0.001
1 <0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.0051
15.6
880
5.1
14.81
1,298
2.3
30
0.05
Jun-04
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
32
MW-2S
Dec-05
<0.01
0.18
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
10.1
Oct-06
<0.01
0.198
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
May-07
<0.01
0.232
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.4
Oct-07
<0.01
0.256
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.6
Jun-08
<0.01
0.103
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.4
Jan-09
<0.01
0.164
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
Jun-09
<0.01
0.173
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
Dec-09
<0.01
0.218
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-10
<0.01
0.229
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Dec-10
<0.01
0.235
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-11
<0.01
0.182
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Dec-11
<0.01
0.216
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-12
<0.01
0.178
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-13
<0.01
0.21
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Dec-13
<0.01
0.199
<0.001
I <0.01
I <0.01
1 <0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 3 of 10
o
0
N
CD
N 3
Cn
O
C�
n
cn
(
30
CD
70 O
n
D
W
n
S
o
m
�
cn
NO
�"� -o
m o
S a
o c
Z
CD X
v o o
O
Sample
N
°'
�.
3
�.
O 3
r
�
C
N
CD
Q
N m
C
�
n
s
0 9
--^.
Location / ID
Date
3
C'
v
3
v
n
C'
3
<
m
m
cn
-o
2
c'
u m
v
<
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Jun-14
<0.01
0.165
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
MW-2S
Dec-14
<0.01
0.2
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Jun-18
<0.015
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
790
6.3
21.0
448
0
-36
0.18
Jan-19
<0.015
0.21
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
400
6.9
10.0
611
5
-124
0.55
Jun-19
<0.015
0.24
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
430
7.0
20.8
641
2
-152
0.18
Mar-20
<0.015
0.28
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
400
6.9
16.8
759
4
-146
0.36
Nov-20
<0.015
0.24
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
400
6.3
21.3
732
15
-120
0.34
Mar-21
<0.015
0.23
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
340
6.6
16.7
615
2
-101
0.20
Nov-21
<0.015
0.20
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1.0
360
6.9
18.8
684
25
-106
0.30
Mar-22
<0.015
0.20
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1.0
320
7.0
17.0
503
4
-83
0.00
Oct-22
<0.015
0.29
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<2.0
400
7.6
17.5
402
8
-2
0.00
May-23
<0.03
0.114
<0.001
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
<1.0
211
7.0
18.2
382
8
-147
0.04
Nov-23
<0.01
0.14
<0.001
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.0051
3.7
255
6.8
14.5
427
4.1
-117
0.04
MW-213
Jun-04
<0.01
0.17
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.6
Dec-05
<0.01
0.3
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.1
Oct-06
<0.01
0.29
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
11
May-07
<0.01
0.254
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.9
Oct-07
<0.01
0.273
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.8
Jun-08
<0.01
0.265
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
22
Jan-09
<0.01
0.253
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
16
Jun-09
<0.01
0.289
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
6.3
Jun-18
<0.015
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
790
7.1
25.0
444
10
18
1.30
Jan-19
<0.015
0.30
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.5
310
7.2
9.7
474
5
-94
880.38
Jun-19
<0.015
0.29
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
330
7.3
20.0
501
10
-63
0.27
Mar-20
<0.015
0.29
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
300
7.1
19.4
540
2
75
0.52
Nov-20
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.3
300
7.1
22.0
529
3
-86
0.34
Mar-21
<0.015
0.27
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
300
7.3
20.4
538
2
-84
0.61
Nov-21
<0.015
0.07
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.1
320
7.2
18.3
478
3
-91
0.34
Mar-22
<0.015
0.29
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1
300
7.2
19.1
499
10
-141
0.51
Oct-22
<0.015
0.36
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.2 H
300
7.9
16.3
347
1
33
0.00
May-23
<0.03
0.271
<0.001
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
1.8
317
7.3
17.1
529
4
-27
0.09
Nov-23
<0.01
1 0.303
<0.001
<0.005
<0.01
1 <0.0002
<0.015
<0.0051
1.3
300
7.2
13.2
526
3.3
-99.9
0.79
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 4 of 10
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
v
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N m
c' C
u m
30
S a
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Dec-05
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
334
MW-3
Oct-06
<0.01
0.192
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
580
May-07
<0.01
0.342
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01 C
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
570
Nov-07
<0.01
0.133
<0.001
<0.01
0.036
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
380
Jun-08
<0.01
0.145
<0.001
<0.01
0.022
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
370
Jan-09
<0.01
0.144
<0.001
<0.01
0.013
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
550
Jun-09
<0.01
0.202
<0.001
<0.01
0.081
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
570
Dec-09
0.012
0.192
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
710
Jun-10
0.011
0.094
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
840
Dec-10
<0.01
0.125
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
690
Jun-11
<0.10
0.119
<0.01
<0.10
<0.10
<0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
790
Dec-11
<0.01
0.234
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
410
Jun-12
<0.01
0.125
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.01
1,000
Dec-12
0.013
0.136
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
0.011
<0.01
910
Jun-13
<0.10d
0.201
<0.01 d
<0.1 d
<0.1 d
<0.0002
<0.1 d
<0.1 d
950
Dec-13
<0.050d
0.162
<0.005d
<0.05d
<0.05d
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
890
Jun-14
<0.027d
0.116
<0.002d
<0.07d
<0.01d
<0.0002
<0.025d
<0.07d
970
Dec-14
<0.050d
0.151
<0.005d
<0.05d
<0.05d
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
760
Jun-18
<0.015
0.066
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
980
830
5.5
27.2
7,611
9
60
0.30
Jan-19
<0.015
0.088
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
930
130
--
4.4
5,256
11
679
369.94
Jun-19
<0.015
0.072
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1,000
4,400
5.2
22.9
6,520
10
-39
0.20
Mar-20
<0.015
0.044
<0.005
<0.01
0.014
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
580
1,600
5.6
16.0
2,456
10.8
-49
0.63
Nov-20
<0.015
0.049
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
710
25,000
5.2
18.9
2,921
6.3
66
0.20
Duplicate (FD-01)
Nov-20
<0.015
0.26
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
370
6,400
--
--
--
--
--
Mar-21
<0.015
0.038
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
240
830
6.0
17.5
1,357
19.8
57
0.38
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
810
2,700
5.4
19.5
3,831
6.0
48
0.39
Mar-22
<0.015
0.038
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
280
850
5.7
15.7
1,287
3.4
-8
0.00
Oct-22
<0.015
0.055
<0.005
<0.01
0.042
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
630
1,800
5.8
16.8
2,340
6.1
113
0.00
May-23
<0.03
0.0398
<0.01
<0.01
0.011
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
251
890
5.7
18.2
1,226
9
97
0.22
Nov-23
I <0.01
1 0.06321
0.0015
<0.0051
0.0179
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.0051
4921
1,3501
5.51
9.91
2,0881
6.81
176.11
0.57
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 5 of 10
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
v
n
m
C
cn
CD
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N El
c' C
u m
30
S D.
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
MW-4
Dec-05
<0.01
0.46
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.7
Oct-06
<0.01
0.171
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
May-07
<0.01
<0.100
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8.6
Oct-07
<0.01
0.147
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.9
Jun-08
<0.01
0.198
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.4
Jan-09
<0.01
0.083
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
6.4
Jun-09
<0.01
0.349
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
7.7
Dec-09
<0.01
0.121
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.5
Jun-10
<0.01
0.181
<0.001
0.018
<0.010
0.0006
<0.01
<0.01
15
Dec-10
0.016
0.195
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
16
Jun-11
<0.01
0.227
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01P
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
28
Dec-11
<0.01
0.516
0.003
<0.01
0.021
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
51
Jun-12
<0.01
0.356
0.008
<0.01
0.032
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
100
duplicate
12/18/12
<0.01
0.262
0.019
<0.01
0.095
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
220
Jun-13
<0.01
0.109
0.004
<0.01
0.021
0.00078
<0.01
<0.01
250
Dec-13
<0.01
0.167
0.006
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
130
Jul-14
<0.01
0.085
0.0017
<0.01
<0.010
0.00101
<0.01
<0.01
190
Dec-14
<0.01
0.071
0.0017
<0.01
<0.010
0.00111
<0.01
<0.01
260
Jun-18
<0.01
0.041
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
66
450
6.4
25.1
72
7
56
0.28
Jan-19
<0.01
0.044
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
46
320
6.7
9.3
499
13
52
0.83
Jun-19
<0.01
0.052
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
30
310
6.9
22.0
553
7
-91
0.47
Mar-20
<0.01
0.054
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
37
-
6.5
16.0
455
5
-51
0.42
Nov-20
<0.01
0.061
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
29
250
6.3
43.0
442
10
43
0.52
Mar-21
<0.01
0.059
<0.005
0.14
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
17
200
6.4
16.9
345
22
9
0.26
Nov-21
0.035
0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
25
230
6.4
21.9
320
6
14
0.29
Mar-22
<0.015
0.064
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
17
200
6.4
15.0
352
4
97
0.00
Oct-22
<0.015
0.086
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
20
250
6.4
20.6
381
9
-103
0.00
May-23
<0.03
0.0657
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
17.4
266
6.4
17.2
413
62
57
0.36
Nov-23
<0.01
0.149
0.01311
0.03311
0.000741
-0.0051
20.1
260
6.5
13.9
519
266.0
-19.9
0.81
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 6 of 10
o
0
N
CD
Cn
O
C�
n
(
N 3
30
CD
70 O
n
D
W
n
S
o
m
cn
�
cn
NO
�"� -o
m o
S a
o c
Z
CD X
v o o
O
Sample
N
°'
�.
3
O 3
r
�
C
CD
N m
�
n
s
0 9
--^.
Location / ID
Date
�.
3
C'
v
3
n
C'
3
<
m
N
m
Q
cn
-o
2
c' C
S, m
v
<
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Dec-05
<0.01
0.45
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.1
MW-5S
Oct-06
<0.01
0.121
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7
May-07
<0.01
0.218
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.7
Oct-07
<0.01
0.278
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.9
Jun-08
<0.01
0.046
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8.7
Jan-09
<0.01
0.051
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
10
Jun-09
<0.01
0.058
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
13
Dec-09
<0.01
0.056
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
17
Jun-10
<0.01
0.057
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
Dec-10
<0.01
0.102
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
Jun-11
<0.01
0.064
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
17
Dec-11
<0.01
0.087
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
21
Jun-12
<0.01
0.095
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
22
Dec-12
<0.01
0.131
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
25
Jun-13
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
22
Dec-13
<0.01
0.088
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
21
Jun-14
<0.01
0.052
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
Dec-14
<0.01
0.082
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
21
Monitor Well
Abandoned on
4/17/15 by
NCDOT and replaced
on 6/11/18
by MW-5RS
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 7 of 10
o
0
N
CD
N 3
Cn
O
C�
n
cn
(
30
CD
70 O
n
D
W
n
S
o
m
�
cn
NO
�"� -o
m o
S a
o c
Z
CD X
v o o
O
Sample
N
°'
�.
3
�.
O 3
r
�
C
N
CD
Q
N m
C
�
n
s
0 9
--^.
Location / ID
Date
3
C'
v
3
n
C'
3
<
m
m
cn
-o
2
c'
S, m
v
<
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
MW-5RS
Jun-18
<0.015
0.098
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
12
420
6.9
23.9
454
7
45
3.37
Jan-19
<0.015
0.10
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.4
260
6.6
12.6
382
2
78
0.99
Jun-19
<0.015
0.11
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1.0
320
7.0
25.3
594
9
-106
0.17
Mar-20
<0.015
0.09
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.1
230
6.6
16.4
363
4
-13
1.10
Nov-20
<0.015
0.10
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.1
290
7.0
22.0
477
1
-17
0.32
Mar-21
<0.015
0.07
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.3
210
6.4
18.2
297
3
143
0.69
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.8
300
7.0
22.8
450
3
24
0.47
Mar-22
<0.015
0.10
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
4.7
220
6.7
16.5
364
6
124
0.54
Oct-22
<0.015
0.08
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
150
6.0
22.1
244
0
213
0.35
May-23
<0.03
0.084
<0.001
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
3.2
249
7.2
20.0
296
10
9
2.63
Nov-23
<0.01
0.086
<0.001
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.0051
2.6
183
6.6
16.1
406
1.5
181.9
1.00
Dec-05
<0.01
0.17
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8.1
MW-5D
Oct-06
<0.01
0.236
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6
May-07
<0.01
0.227
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.8
Oct-07
<0.01
0.258
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.6
Jun-08
<0.01
0.254
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
10
Jan-09
<0.01
0.255
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
10
Jun-09
<0.01
0.261
NR
NR
<0.010
<0.0002
NR
NR
17
Monitor Well
Abandoned on
4/17/15 by
NCDOT and replaced
on 6/11/18
by MW-5RD
MW-51RD
Jun-18
<0.01
0.15
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
26
230
7.3
23.0
327
20
29
0.12
Jan-19
<0.01
0.22
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
17
230
7.4
11.9
374
10
-125
730.47
Jun-19
<0.01
0.21
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
250
7.3
24.0
388
9
-94
0.21
Mar-20
<0.01
0.25
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
11
240
7.3
16.2
383
4
-1
2.09
Nov-20
<0.01
0.22
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.9
240
7.3
21.5
384
10
-120
0.67
Mar-21
<0.01
0.096
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
4.7
140
7.4
18.6
265
4
136
1.77
Nov-21
<0.01
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.0
190
7.4
21.6
321
1
-45
1.05
Mar-22
<0.015
0.18
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.2
220
7.4
17.7
242
8
-2
2.98
Oct-22
<0.015
0.16
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.7 H
170
7.0
20.4
298
0
41
0.40
May-23
<0.03
0.143
<0.001
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
8.2
183
6.8
19.9
402
3
50
0.04
Nov-23
<0.01
0.185
<0.001
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.005
10.5
189
7.3
12.8
349
7.5
21.9
0.47
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 8 of 10
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N m
c' C
S, m
30
S a
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Dec-05
<0.01
1.3
<0.001
<0.01
0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
174
MW-6
Oct-06
<0.01
0.816
<0.001
<0.01
0.013
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
510
May-07
<0.01
0.312
<0.001
<0.01
0.032
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
220
Nov-07
<0.01
0.12
<0.001
<0.01
0.074
0.00026
<0.01
<0.01
290
Jun-08
<0.01
0.08
<0.001
<0.01
0.054
0.00091
<0.01
<0.01
490
Jan-09
<0.01
0.066
NR
NR
0.014
<0.0002
NR
NR
560
Jun-09
0.018
0.155
NR
NR
0.016
0.00026
NR
NR
430
Dec-09
0.014
0.126
<0.001
<0.01
0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
220
Jun-10
0.109
0.313
<0.001
<0.01
0.155
0.0003
<0.01
<0.01
300
Dec-10
0.018
0.138
<0.001
<0.01
<0.010
<0.01
<0.01
350
Jun-11
<0.10
0.717
<0.01
<0.10
<0.10
0.00095
<0.10
<0.10
460
Dec-11
<0.01
0.148
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
260
Jun-12
<0.05
0.156
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.01
330
Dec-12
0.031
0.131
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
0.012
<0.01
270
Jun-13
<0.01
0.152
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
270
Dec-13
<0.05d
0.247
<0.005d
<0.05d
<0.05d
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
300
Jun-14
0.0189
0.193
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
260
Dec-14
0.099
0.155
<0.005d
<0.05d
0.122
<0.0002
<0.05d
<0.05d
660
Jun-18
0.043
0.047
<0.005
<0.01
0.045
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1,000
6,300
3.9
25.3
9,665
0
196
0.78
Jan-19
0.039
0.077
<0.005
<0.01
0.022
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
870
3,600
3.8
8.3
4,993
4
290
975.76
Jun-19
0.083
0.086
<0.005
<0.01
0.074
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
760
7,100
3.8
22.0
11,164
5
45
0.20
Mar-20
0.073
0.11
<0.005
<0.01
0.160
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
740
7,000
3.7
16.6
11,118
2
246
0.28
Nov-20
0.066
0.078
<0.005
<0.01
0.085
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
820
7,700
3.5
23.0
9,811
1
294
0.20
Mar-21
0.055
0.075
<0.005
<0.01
0.052
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
600
5,800
3.8
17.6
8,772
1
105
0.26
Nov-21
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
790
5,500
3.7
20.2
9,522
0
231
0.30
Mar-22
0.052
0.083
<0.005
<0.01
0.070
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
670
4,900
3.6
14.9
9,348
3
213
0.00
Oct-22
0.058
0.081
<0.005
<0.01
0.100
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
650
5,100
3.5
19.8
7,890
0
248
0.00
May-23
0.0461
0.0656
<0.01
<0.01
0.073
<0.0002
<0.200
<0.05
569
6,750
3.8
15.8
9,422
4
227
0.31
Nov-23
1
1 0.0697
.00
<0.0251
0.0552
<0.0002
<0.015
<0.0051
6771
5,4201
3.71
12.91
8,3511
2.1
2731
6.48
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 9 of 10
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N m
c' C
S, m
30
S a
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Dec-05
0.038
<0.001
<0.01
0.093
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
379
MW 7
Oct-06
0.03
0.059
<0.001
<0.01
0.053
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
500
May-07
0.017
<0.001
<0.01
0.047
0.0003
<0.01
<0.01
460
Nov-07
0.029
<0.100
<0.001
<0.01
0.124
0.00072
<0.01
<0.01
250
Jun-08
0.019
0.042
<0.001
<0.01
0.072
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
420
Jan-09
0.022
0.052
<0.001
<0.01
0.088
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
500
Jun-09
0.072
0.08
<0.001
<0.01
0.171
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
500
Dec-09
0.128
0.123
<0.01
<0.01
0.273
0.0006
<0.10
<0.10
490
Jun-10
0.208
0.172
<0.01
<0.01
0.379
0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
530
Dec-10
0.23
0.255
<0.01
<0.01
0.649
0.00057
<0.10
<0.10
590
Jun-11
0.134
0.159
<0.01
<0.10
0.396
0.00033
<0.10
<0.10
540
Dec-11
0.107
0.172
<0.01
<0.10
0.468
-U.Uuv<
<0.10
<0.10
640
Jun-12
0.059
0.12
<0.005
<0.05
0.27
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.05
580
Dec-12
0.158
<0.01
<0.10
0.397
<0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
700
Jun-13
0.114
<0.01d
<0.10d
0.19
<0.0002
<0.10d
<0.10d
600
Dec-13
0.07
0.119
<0.05d
<0.050d
0.235
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
470
Jun-14
0.078
0.093
<0.002d
<0.007d
0.139
<0.0002
<0.025d
<0.010d
670
Dec-14
0.167
0.205
<0.05d
<0.050d
0.553
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
710
Jun-18
0.041
0.1
0.0074
<0.02
0.089
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
770
9,400
3.8
23.0
13,584
2
243
1.37
Jan-19
0.089
0.097
<0.01
0.190
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
920
8,100
3.8
8.1
10,375
2
250
0.97
Jun-19
0.077
0.16
0.012
<0.01
0.160
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
630
10,000
3.7
21.5
15,916
9
128
0.31
Mar-20
0.093
0.13
0.012
<0.01
0.260
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
770
10,000
4.0
12.0
16,317
5
193
0.41
Nov-20
0.089
0.14
<0.005
<0.01
0.260
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
640
12,000
3.5
20.9
16,203
3
259
0.24
Mar-21
0.080
0.092
<0.005
<0.01
0.160
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
670
8,000
3.8
16.0
12,734
8
186
0.25
Nov-21
0.090
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
0.270
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
700
10,000
3.7
20.9
15,392
4
205
0.27
Mar-22
0.081
0.13
<0.005
<0.01
0.200
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
720
8,300
3.6
14.8
14,887
5
311
0.07
Oct-22
0.077
0.13
0.0052
<0.01
0.220
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
680
9,600
3.5
19.4
16,500
0
255
0.08
May-23
0.0637
0.0874
<0.01
<0.01
0.185
<0.0002
<0.200
<0.05
565
10,700
3.8
17.8
1,540
11
209
7.36
Nov-23
0.111
0.0071
<0.005
0.171
<0.0002
<0.075
<0.025
657
9,330
3.8
13.9
15,440
14.8
287
0.30
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

APPENDIX Al
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 10 of 10
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
N
W
°'
�.
C�
n
3
�.
3
n
S
o
3
O C'
v
3
r
�
n
m
C
cn
�
C'
3
<
m
cn
N
m
o
N
(
NO
CD
Q
cn
-o
2
CD
N 3
�"� -o
m o
N m
c' C
S, m
30
S a
o c
�
n
Z s
v
CD
70 O
CD X
v o o
0 9
--^.
<
0
Cn
O
n
O
vCD
NC 2L Ground Water Standard (mg/1)
0.01
0.7
0.002
0.01
0.015
0.001
0.02
0.02
250
500
6.5 - 8.5
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
MW-8
May-07
0.025
<0.100
<0.001
<0.01
0.024
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
400
Nov-07
0.03
<0.100
<0.001
<0.01
0.038
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
430
Jun-08
0.031
0.048
<0.001
<0.01
0.027
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
300
Jan-09
0.028
0.039
NR
NR
0.032
<0.0002
NR
NR
350
Jun-09
0.159
0.114
NR
NR
0.173
0.0003
NR
NR
460
Dec-09
0.569
0.286j
<0.016
<0.050
0.376j
0.0002
<0.135
<0.095
460
Jun-10
0.366
0.232
<0.016
<0.050
0.283
0.0002
<0.135
<0.095
500
Dec-10
0.267
0.243
<0.01
<0.100
0.369
0.0013
<0.100
<0.100
470
Jun-11
0.207
0.223
<0.01
<0.100
0.103
<0.0002
<0.100
<0.100
410.0
Dec-11
<0.100
0.321
<0.01
<0.100
<0.100
<0.0002
<0.100
<0.100
270
Jun-12
0.146
0.169
<0.005
<0.05
0.199
<0.0002
<0.05
<0.05
580
Dec-12
0.11
0.168
<0.01
<0.100
0.234
<0.0002
<0.10
<0.10
580
Jun-13
0.14
0.172
<0.01d
<0.100d
0.169
<0.0002
<0.10d
<0.10d
620
Dec-13
0.126
0.177
<0.05d
<0.050d
0.211
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
510
Jun-14
0.154
0.13
<0.002d
<0.007d
0.168
<0.0002
<0.025d
<0.010d
700
Dec-14
0.124
0.143
<0.05d
<0.050d
0.263
<0.0002
<0.050d
<0.050d
620
Jun-18
0.055
0.056
<0.005
<0.02
0.10
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1,000
8,400
3.9
19.0
11,539
0
125
0.69
Jan-19
0.1
0.093
<0.005
<0.01
0.100
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
870
7,800
3.8
9.2
11,013
5
216
0.64
Jun-19
0.092
0.092
<0.005
<0.01
0.190
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
780
9,900
3.9
20.5
14,721
2
92
0.33
Mar-20
0.09
0.1
<0.005
<0.01
0.150
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
710
8,100
3.9
13.3
13,074
38
251
0.76
Nov-20
0.078
0.092
<0.005
<0.01
0.230
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
660
16,000
3.4
20.4
13,803
5
204
0.59
Mar-21
Monitor well
unable to be
sampled due
to biological hazard
Nov-21
0.07
0.089
<0.005
<0.01
0.240
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
610
7,300
3.9
19.5
12,230
9
235
0.29
Mar-22
0.071
0.11
<0.005
<0.01
0.110
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
580
6,400
3.8
15.2
11,810
4
261
0.00
Oct-20
0.055
0.1
<0.005
<0.01
0.180
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
650
6,200
3.7
18.4
10,200
4
2
0.00
May-23
0.0598
0.106
<0.01
0.0043J
0.148
<0.0002
<0.400
<0.05
541
8,400
4.0
17.0
1,234
76
244
0.03
Nov-23
1
1 0.0967
<0.01
1 0.143
<0.0002
<0.075
<0.025
601
6,6901
4.0
14.3
8,0201
34.21
2601
0.27
All concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L) unless otherwise noted
NE - Not established
-- - Not sampled
Bold with gray background indicates exceedance of NC 2L Groundwater Standard
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A1-Historic Groundwater

I_1 „=1 L1 101►:I_�+%
SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 1 of 3
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
0
oo
m
c'
3
n
n
3
C:
3
3
o
0 3
c'
v 3
r
m
Q
c
Cn
m CD
c'
3
Cn
<
m
Cn
�
v
m
o
o
m
U)
Q
6
=
a
�
C@
(n 3
CD m
v
E
v
� �
.
o c
<'
4
Z c
C a
V
O
x
a
v' Q
G�
o
N.
o
<
0 .
O
3
co ca
V�
NC 2B Surface Water Standard -
Class C (ug/1)
0.15
1 NE
1 0.002 h
0.05 h
0.025
1 0.0000121
0.005
1 0.00006
1 NE
I NE
1 6.0 - 9.0
1 NE
I NE
1 50
1 NE 1
>5.0
04/03/03
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.005
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
12
SW-01
06/22/04
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<2.0
12/01 /05
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.3
10/06/06
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
Surface Water - Upstream
05/04/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.6
10/22/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.8
06/18/08
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.5
01/14/09
<0.01
<0.10
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
5.6
06/24/09
<0.01
0.03
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
12/16/09
<0.01
0.048
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.2
06/30/10
<0.01
0.032
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/14/10
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/27/11
<0.01
0.041
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/19/11
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/18/12
<0.01
0.028
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/25/13
<0.01
0.04
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
04/13/12
<0.01
0.025
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.3
06/27/14
<0.01
0.03
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/17/14
<0.01
0.027
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/28/18
<0.015
0.031
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
73
6.95
28.46
101
NM
-2.5
4.2
01/21/19
<0.015
0.090
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
6.1
79
7.84
6.50
107
11.0
37.1
19.2
06/17/19
<0.015
0.058
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.7
110
8.21
27.00
91
139.0
-130.0
2.1
03/09/20
<0.015
0.046
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
3.4
110
6.65
13.00
176
14.4
-45.6
8.4
11/09/20
<0.015
0.032
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.8
91
6.79
15.20
94
9.7
26.2
4.2
03/26/21
<0.015
0.031
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.0
66
6.68
19.20
92
39.0
126.5
6.5
11/01/21
<0.015
0.027
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.3
75
7.32
14.40
77
A
35.4
8.2
03/22/22
<0.015
0.029
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.6
55
7.60
16.00
660
NM
102.0
9.0
10/20/22
<0.015
0.027
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.8
110
5.58
12.19
233
2.2
125.0
7.0
5/25/23
<0.03
0.038
<0.01
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
6.0
76
7.3
19.6
105
15.5
33
6.86
11/28/23
1 <0.031
0.0426
<0.01
I <0.01
1 <0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
1 11.41
1201
6.61
12.31
1781
29.81
251
8.18
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A2-Historic SurfaceWater

/_1,:j =10111/:I_�+�
SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 2 of 3
Sample
Location / ID
Date
>
CD
co
v
3
n
3
3
3
o
0 3
�' 3
r CD
Q
0
Cl)
m
`
3
�
`
Cn
�_
°
m
o
o
°
o
2
Q
��=
�
N�
CD
w m
m
3
o
�-
<
c
Z
��
O
x
v
��
_C
v a
3
G
o
N.
o
<
Q
O
D
NC 2B Surface Water Standard -
Class C (ug/1)
0.15
1 NE
1 0.002 "
0.05 "
1 0.025
1 0.000012
0.005
1 0.00006
1 NE
I NE
1 6.0 - 9.0
1 NE
I NE
1 50
1 NE
1 >5.0
04/03/03
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<O.G
-�0.005
<O.000
<O.0
<O.0
12
SW-02
06/22/04
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<2.0
12/01 /05
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.3
10/06/06
<0.01
0.09
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
Surface Water - Downstream
05/04/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.6
10/22/07
DRY
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.8
08/07/08
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.5
01/14/09
<0.01
'^ ^
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
5.6
06/24/09
<0.01
0.088
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
12/16/09
<O.G
0.025
0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.2
06/30/10
DRY
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/14/10
<0.01
0.034
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/27/11
DRY
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/19/11
<0.01
0.027
0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/18/12
<0.01
0.031
:0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/25/13
<0.01
0.037
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
04/13/12
<0.01
0.023
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
5.3
06/27/14
<0.01
0.038
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/17/14
<0.01
0.027
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
06/28/18
<0.015
0.089
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
130
6.98
29.68
369
90.0
-0.4
0.7
01/21/19
<0.01
0.027
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
7
100
5.81
3.60
171
6.6
139.6
14.2
06/17/19
<0.01
0.052
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
150
5.76
26.10
225
23.4
44.2
1.6
03/09/20
<0.01
:0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
4.9
98
6.94
13.40
166
5.2
-39.0
9.8
11/09/20
<0.015
0.039
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.0
1.1
91
6.41
19.30
133
11.0
-72.0
13.0
03/25/21
<0.01 �
0.026
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.8
66
7.16
20.40
65
16.2
65.1
9.9
11/09/20
<0.01b
:0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.5
67
6.8
18.3
325.3
11.4
63.4
3.78
11/01/21
<0.015
0.048
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
5.3
110
6.7
17.1
184.5
6.98
-8.7
2.48
03/22/22
<0.01
:0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.5
64
6.7
19.3
70
15
100
11.16
03/22/22
<0.01
0.04
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
1.6
58
7.1
10.8
59
0.8
37
2.83
5/26/23
<0.0
0.0256
<0.005
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
65.2
164
6.5
21.4
186
18.1
25
2.81
11/29/23
<O.0
0.0267
:0.005
<0.01
1 <0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
6.3
165
6.4
5.3
628
14.6
16
2.27
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A2-Historic SurfaceWater

I_1 „=1 L1 101►:I_�+%
SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SWIFT CREEK STRUCTURAL FILL - CCB0057
BATTLEBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 3 of 3
Sample
Location / ID
Date
D
m
0
pp
v
C'
3
C�
a
3
C:
3
3
o
3
C'
v 3
r
m
Q
cn
CD
(D
3
�
m
cn
C
v
m
o
m
Cn
o
m
=
a
(D
�V
N 3.
m0-0
v
m
CL o c
N �»
c
a
C Q
0
x
m' n
o
N.
o
a
O
1<
cQ m
�
NC 2B Surface Water Standard -
Class C (ug/I)
0.15
1 NE
1 0.002 h
0.05 h
0.025
1 0.0000121
0.005
1 0.00006
1 NE
I NE
1 6.0 - 9.0
1 NE
I NE
1 50 1
NE 1
>5.0
05/04/07
<0.01
<0.10
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
2.4
SW-03
10/22/07
DRY
06/18/08
<0.01
0.089
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
3.3
01/14/09
<0.01
<0.10
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
20
Surface Water- Downstream
06/24/09
<0.01
0.087
NR
NR
<0.01
<0.0002
NR
NR
<5
12/16/09
<0.01
0.075
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
14
06/30/10
<0.01
0.328
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
47
12/14/10
<0.01
0.074
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
16
06/27/11
DRY
12/19/11
<0.01
0.065
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
8
12/18/12
<0.01
0.067
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
6.5
06/25/13
<0.01
0.087
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
7.4
04/13/12
<0.01
0.051
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
23
06/27/14
<0.01
0.038
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
<5
12/17/14
<0.01
0.08
<0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.01
<0.01
9.9
06/28/18
<0.015
0.032
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
76
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
01/21/19
<0.015
0.03
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
31
160
5.6
6.3
257
14.5
138
13.1
06/17/19
<0.015
0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
<1
99
5.7
26.4
235.5
19.7
48.4
5.06
03/09/20
<0.015
0.035
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
9.8
94
6.3
10.5
265.4
6.98
55.1
8.9
11/09/20
<0.015
<0.025
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
2.5
67
6.8
18.3
325.3
11.4
63.4
3.78
03/25/21
Unable to collect
sample
due to biological
hazard near
sampling
location
11/01/21
<0.015
0.026
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
9.3
82
6.5
20.7
172.8
7.28
34.6
3.14
03/22/22
<0.015
0.036
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0002
<0.02
<0.01
15
120
6.5
16.4
81
11.00
69.0
10.83
05/25/23
DRY
11/28/23
1 <0.03
0.0319
<0.005
<0.01
<0.025
<0.0002
<0.04
<0.01
1 6.01
911
6.61
8.9
128.7
29.8
0.11
6.98
All concentrations in micrograms per liter (ug/L) unless otherwise noted
NE - Not established
-- - Not sampled
NM - Not measured
DRAFT Swift Creek Tables 2023 11.xlsx/Table A2-Historic SurfaceWater
Bold indicates exceedance of NC 2B Water Quality Standard
h = hardness dependent dissolved metal standard

►lip,,.ERM
APPENDIX B FIELD DATA SHEETS
NOVEMBER 2023

ERM
Bottle Order/Label Sheet
Site: Swift Creek
ERM Project Number: 0397281
BOTTLE LABEL
Water Level
Metals
(6010)
Sulfate
(300)
TDS
(2540C)
*MW-01S-WG-202003
$1 q
X
X
X
MW-0ID-WG-202003
4,0 b
X
X
X
MW-02S-WG-202003
,
X
X
X
MW-02D-WG-202003
X
X
X
MW-03-WG-202003
X
X
X
MW-04-WG-202003
I'(, `51
X
X
X
MW-05RS-WG-202003
X
X
X
MW-05RD-WG-202003
2
X
X
X
MW-06-WG-202003
12
X
X
X
MW-07-WG-202003
a G
X
X
X
MW-08-WG-202003
,
X
X
X
SW-01-WG-202003
%
X
X
X
SW-02-WG-202003
X
X
X
SW-03-WG-202003
X
X
X
FD-01-WG-202003
X
X
X
-WG-202003
X
X
X
SUM (Bottle Count):
Notes
Please include:
- 1 trip blank per cooler.
- At least 1 CoC per cooler.
- 1 custody seal per cooler.
- Prepaid shipping labels, if possible.
*Collect FD-01 at MW-01S
Key:
= Normal sample
= Duplicate sample
= QAQC sample
= Extra set for breakag,
Ib 5 5
"/t`6
1pgN
II/2�
IL)S�I
�I/7
I�;
i��
ll i
IU'ZW
II/24
,g 1(,- 2
IG r` �o
iyi�0
I(/Z
ERM Field Team Note: add the sample day in dd format to the end of the sample ID (i.e. MW-C
�4c� e-n dl :2 4 � a , /'? /(,-
/tit F 0y4 e 4�'cT — --ff

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
j
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID:(j S -yj Z 11`
Date: a -z-?,
Time: 1 S 1
Sampling Personnel (circle one):
Daniela A "y ---�
Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one):
Sunn artly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: FI h Surface Completion tick Up Completion—
Well Tag Present: a No
___.. _.
Well Locked: -Sj No Lock Present: 0, No
Well ID info on Tag: es No
Well Bolted: s, o Well Cap:
Yq, No
Well Cap Condition:- o , Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: oo , Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location; Gra s, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
9
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): , U
Screen Length: 5, io 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1> 1
Well Diameter: L2t' 4, 6, 8
Total Volume Purged: ptiL
Casing Type: ,Steel
Purge Rate: (lio mL/min
Sampling Device: eris a _ onsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: op of Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: Odor: es, No
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%4
5 Z
G
A2,
(
iU
1,
2(
15, 4'
Poo
Ot
2i r li
Z
(4, t
5
(b'A q
(7,
( - �?
I
r
1 .Z
5r5S
I05'
5-7
5.�
c
� l
e c_ -
c; ✓V
I ' ._.e
..e .M.... � n ma
N» _,...n.
/
.�
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /\ `-
Official Sampling Date & Time: `� i `i ? 41
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D H NO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) -Do not measure depth to bottom of welI until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2)- Stabil'¢ation criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total dravdovm in well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 ft). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdown below 0.1 or (0,32 ft).
(4) t/- 10%when turbidity is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6) - DO is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)- RP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type:((Monitor Well PT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: omq - 0 t D - Vq U I, - j 1 U1
Date: // ` &2-�a
Time:
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Daniela Aljy.-
Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): unny artly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion tick 1p Complettorr='
Well Tag Present: Y , No
Well Locked: es No Lock Present: Ye No
Well ID info on Tag: Y� , No
Well Bolted: Yes, tco Well Cap: Yes, No
Well Cap Condition: (Goo-q. eplace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: .off racked, Replace, Other:
Well Location:,Grass,,Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments: lit '' � e� GVt i
�) G� IM � VG�: � `- � �� eVl �ctIll LqMeA�
Total Depth of Well (T.D.
Screen Length: 5, 10, 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): tit
Well Diameter: (P 4, s, 8
Total Volume Purged: K2
Casing Type: 'PV-6, Steel
Purge Rate: mL/min
Sampling Device: erisfaatf Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing T e: olyethyle e -.
g yp
Measuring Point: - Top of Ca ng:> other:
Pump Intake (ft beTow M.P.): J
Color: r Odor: Yes, a
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
(oc)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%4
AL�we
i 14
- v
U
0, L4
-,
�o U
D
to
- 2
"Or,
5fl
i,
IZ
I
tJ.)
LINT,,
Z c
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro/
Official Sampling Date & Time: i i /-Ui I Itr23 / 1,4 Ul
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C — 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) - Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may be resting on the well bottom.
(2)-Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total dra�sdown in well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 fl). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdovm below 0.1 in (0.32 ft).
(4)+/- 10%vfien turbidity is over 10 NTUa.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
is - DO Is hot a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SEED Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)- ORP is not a stabilization cri erion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
`r.:..J
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: ' - U ,1 �, 11 - v
Date: it
Time:
Sampling Personnel (circle one): clanie J'
Andrew jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): t66na Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Completio
Well Tag Present: a No
Well Locked: es No Lock Present: No
Well ID info on Tag: es,? No
Well Bolted: Yes, 19 Well Cap: Yes, o
Well Cap Condition:. _ d eplace, Other:
Well Pad Condition oo , Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location Gras ,Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): a t?
Screen Length: 5, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): 1�1
Well Diameter: 2 4, s, a
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: (P—vo Steel
Purge Rate: Q>; mL/min
Sampling Device: Peristaltic Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Poiyethylen
Measuring Point: op of Casin other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: IN N Odor: Yes, 00
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
Cc)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
my
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
(gallons)
(see note
below)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10p4
CI.At)
G
3
of
LAZ
110
1 S'
-1 c?
o
z1,
U0
t
I
Z
9t7
5
C , C 'l
1 1U
I
$4
UJA
0, 0 41-
V
G
-777
Field Parameters measured with: &Sl Pro_Fl
Official Sampling Date & Time: u lul I U yid 1.1 l! s
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) -Do not measure depth to bottom of v elI until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may be resting on the well bottom.
(2) - Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total dray.down in well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 it). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dray.dovm below 0.1 m (0.32 it).
(4) +/-10% when turbidity is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6)- DO rs not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure
,
(7)-ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure,

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID:
w C-,- �Z?jll 2
Date: I I Ii 1
Time:
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Daniela Ali `
Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): Sun , Partly Cloudy, Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completio Stick Up Com Ptio
Well Tag Present:
0e, No
Well Locked: Ye No
Lock Present: est No
Well ID info on Tag:
No
Well Bolted: Yes, No
Well Cap: N
Well Cap ConditiReplace,
Other: "
Well Pad Condition. Good
racked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: GrasO Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
Screen Length: 5, co, 15,
20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): ('I
Well Diameter: z 4," 6, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: vC Steel
Purge Rate:
mL/min
Sampling Device: eristaltic
Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyeth P
Measuring Point: op -of other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color:
Odor: Yes, o
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
Cc
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
(gallons)
(see note
belllOW)3
+/-
3%/�
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
+/-
10%
+/-
1(j0my
+/-
1o%4
[
i. J1
r
8r I
Y-in/3%
C'•/ [�
1
maw,
C.
( U
t UP
2 .3
-G u �
a
r
Field Parameters measured with: sl Pro]�
Official Sampling Date & Time: 1"A ( ICU
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540c 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1)- Do not measure depth to bottom of we II until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2)- Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total drav,dovm in well to be less than 0.1 in (0.32 fp. Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdown below 0.1 m (0.32 ft).
(4) +/-10% v.t— turbidity Is over 10 NT Us.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6)- DO is net a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)-ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
`3
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Mon) r Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: — - i✓ 2
Date: 2-
Time:
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Da iela Aliy
drew Jaskoww
Weather Conditions (circle one): un , Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, ick Cow letion
Well Tag Present: YQ No
Well Locked: Ke , No Lock Present: , No
Well ID info on Tag: Y sf No
Well Bolted: Yes, o Well Cap: e , No
Well Cap Condition! Go ,Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: co), Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location' ras , Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): 2
Screen Length: 5, 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1)
Well Diameter: 04, 5, 8
Total Volume Purged: p!'a
Casing Type: V , Steel
Purge Rate: mL/min
Sampling Device: Pen tat c, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: Top of Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: A 0 Odor: Yes, N* 0
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
(gallons)
(see note
below) 3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
1o%4
--
I,17
A
-41
iq 32-
040
i
n
',
T
7
13 f
- -
Z
r
�
-
�(
(
I OU
12 i
t
1200
)v
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: l 'Z�- 1 ; / 13 i 0
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540c 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1)- Do not measure depth to bottom of well until aRer purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may th resting on the well bottom.
(2J - Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutNe measurements.
(3) - Total rl-%down in well to be less than 0.1 in (0.32 fl). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dr-down below 0.1 in (0.32 ft).
(4) It. 10% wban turbiddy is .,or 10 NTUs.
(5) WeII Volume (gal)=0.04ld2h
(6) - DO is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure,
(7)-ORP s not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (.Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID:
Date: r _
Time: I
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Daniela Aliy
ndrew-da—sRowiakE
Weather Conditions (circle one): Su , Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, ick Completion
Well Tag Present: e , No
Well Locked: s, No Lock Present: ns, No
Well ID info on Tag: a No
Well Bolted: Well Cap: No
Well Cap Condition: oo , Replace, Other:
Well Pad Conditio ood Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location'' ra , Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments.
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
Screen Length: 5, , 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1) t
Well Diameter: tea, 4, 6, 8
Total Volume Purge i2 7
Casing Type: , Steel
Purge Rate: mL/min
Sampling Device: erist ic, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: T (Cas g other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: ,� Odor: Yes, o
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
/'A'L
(gallons)
(see note
below)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
( 14
"_`
a,q(
6
n
"3
q,
t
_
S
_
.-
!i
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: 11-21 —Z 5 / 12,11 02
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540c 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) -Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2) - Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total dray.dovm in well to be less than 0.1 in(0.32 f ). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dravdovm below 0.1 in (0.32 f).
(4) ,,- 10 % when turbidly is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6)- DO isnot a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7) - ORP is, not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (rofonitr DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: sL
Date: — 2-
Time: 1
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Daniela Aliy 0�rtdrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): Sunny) Partly Cloudy, Clobdy,-Rain Other
3
ERM
Well Type: Flush Surf e Completion, Stick Up CoUlpletion
Well Tag Present: esf No
Well Locked: o
Lock Present: , e No
Well ID info on Tag: e , No
Well Bolted: Yes,
Well Cap: e , No
Well Cap
Condition: 402, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: ood
racked, Replace, Other:
Well Location' rass Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
N, 36
Screen Length:
5, 110215, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): 111
Well Diameter: 224, 6, 8
Total Volume Purged: 12 �7a
Casing Type: v , Steel
Purge Rate: 0,9
mL/min
Sampling Device: r eristat Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point:
Top of Casi other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: C�: .�
Odor: Yes, 6o
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Critena2
(gallons)
(see note
below)3
3%
0.1 unit
3%
10%
10 mV
10%,
o5z
-
7a .3
FZ..q
7;,Tl
��r.
Zi'.S—
zT ?r
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro/
/�
Official Sampling Date & Time: 0� 2q— 7 7 / 10i 1®
Samples Collected: Analysis Reauested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1)-Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the well bottom.
(2)-Stabilization criteria based on three most recent c.nsecuWe measurements.
f3) -Total drvo own in well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 f). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep draw -down below, 0.1 m (0.32 ft).
fill t/-10%when turbidly Is over 10 NTUs_
f5l Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
6l-Do
's not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
f7)- ORP e, not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift C_reqk ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: ` onitor Vell, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: n, 0 2-
Date: J(- - Z02 �
Time:
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Daniela My rAndrew Jaskowlak
Weather Conditions (circle one): Sun y, Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Completion
Well Tag Present: No
Well Locked: Y , No Lock Present: 1'&�, No
Well ID info on Tag: e , No
Well Bolted: Yes, o, Well Cap: /Yet, No
Well Cap Condition: , Replace, Other:
Well Pad COndltlOn: (Go ,Cracked, Replace, Other:
W011 Location' lass Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
Screen Length: 5, 1 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): 11) t
Well Diameter: z, 4, 6, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: t'Pv t steel
Purge Rate: -r � ,,,,6, mL/min
Sampling Device: Veristaly , Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene a' l✓Jf�
Measuring Point: —Top Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): ..O
Color: G( ./ Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
f-I L
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%,
I
P---
- 2
0o
2
y(
Z
v.
2q,
0
LfI
r'4w 4 41
�b
1Z
2
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro
���
/ 111,00
Official Sampling Date & Time: ,q —2
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested:
Preservative:
Hold Time (days):
Lab:
Metals 6010D
HNO3
28
Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300
—
28
Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C
—
7
Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) -Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may be resting on the well bottom.
(2) -Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutwe m easurements.
(3) - Total dravdovm in yell to be less than 0.1 m (0.321t). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdown below 0.1 in(0.32 ft).
(4) +/-10%when turbidity is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
(6)- DO s not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)-ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: M W - 8 0
Date: 1114,42
Time:
Sampling Personnel
(circle one): Daniela Aliy
Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): Sunn Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion�rese�_
Well Tag Present: G1, No
Well Locked: No Lock P
Well ID info on Tag: No
Well Bolted: Yes, Co Well Cap: (Ye , No
Well Cap
Condition: o0, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: oo Cracked, Replace, Other:
,
Well Location' rass, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): (��, L
Screen Length:
5, 10 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): t11 `
Well Diameter: z a, 6, 8
Total Volume Purged: /J
Casing Type:
v steel
Purge Rate: mL/min
Sampling Device:
eristaitic Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point:
Top of Casin other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): , (� '
Color: 11 d i,X
Odor: Yes,
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
(gallons)
(see note
below)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%,
+n
�-1k
4 ql)
L 1
(
,e
G
i- '1�.
v
l, ^" 60
Ll
r
r o
16�
l5
al b
t l
ell A
Oq I 1i
i U0
q,1
I
U.
, +,C
'f
•Z.
1 r
t
0
5'
2.
2r
4 215 1
6, LA
?2 5
v
y..
S
Field Parameters measured with:"YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: i I f zat 111
z ; / I it S L
r—�
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested:
Preservative:
Hold Time (days):
Lab:
Metals 6010D
HNO3
28
Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300
—
28
Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C
7
Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) - Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may be resting on the well bottom.
(2) - Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total dray.dovm in well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 ft). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dr-d— below 0.1 in(0,32 11).
(4) +1_ 10 % Men turbidity is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal)= 0,041d2h:
(6)- DO s not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampli g" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)- ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: 7 w`" V -
Date: tl -Z F 7-
Time: '
Sampling Personnel (circle one):
D_ajiiela Aliy
ndrew Jaskow'a
Weather Conditions (circle one):
Sun y, Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Raifr6ther
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, ick U Completion
Well Tag Present: Yes No
Well Locked: e , No Lock Present• e , No
Well ID info on Tag: � s No
Well Bolted: Yes, o Well Cap:
fi? No
Well Cap Condit' n: o , Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition',Goo Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location. Gra , Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comment .
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
Screen Length: 5, , 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): 0)
Well Diameter: 4, 6, 8
Total Volume Purged:YL
Casing Type: v steel
Purge Rate: loo mL/min
Sampling Device: r
,�qjdtic, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: Top of Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: (/ Odor: Yes, . , o
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
11vt (_
(gallons)
(see note
beloW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
-- —A,
k,
q
i
• 2l
1,
.�
12
-? t 73
9
9 P
-�
-
tl f2
-
I 9
r
) �-
rJ3
Z
q
oLgq -
.
Field Parameters measured with:
YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: 11_ Z (.-2
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 — 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) - Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may be resting on the well bottom.
(2)- Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total dravdovm in well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 it). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep draedovm below 0,1 m (0.32 ft).
(4) +1- 10%wtien turbidity Is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0,041d2h:
(6)- DO is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)- ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Mon`it r Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other)
Sample ID: (�
Date: ��IZr
Time: -Ij 0 0
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Daniela Aliy
drew Jas iak
Weather Conditions (circle one): un y, Partly Cloudy,
Clou ain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, tick U Completion
Well Tag Present: eq, No
Well Locked: e , No Lock Present: e , No
Well ID info on Tag: Xes No
Well Bolted: Yes, Well Cap: 19s, No
Well Cap
Condition: If.9d. Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: oo , Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: Grass, Asphalt, Concrete, oo s, Other:
Additional Comments:`
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
Screen Length:
5, 0 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): I'I
Well Diameter:
a, 6, 8
Total Volume Purged: ; 019
Casing Type:
v , steel
Purge Rate: , mL/min
Sampling Device:
perishtic, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point:
Top of Casing other:
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.): }
Color:
Odor: Yes, o
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
/V1L,.
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 my
+/-
10%4
10
z
Itf
922
10
27'
0
t z
i
-
14, It
1
r%
10
o
5
-7
.9
-
;`
j.
p
,.
-
0_
2
q
�+
��
t-
i
r -
o
01,27
2J• ,
-I 2
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: 1 /-%9-21v7 z / 15 1 /v
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 5010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1)-Do not measure depth to bottom of well unit after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may be resting on the well bottom.
(2)- Stabilization crHeds based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total dr-down in well to be less than 0,1 m (0.32 ft). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dr-'Jam below 0.1 m (0.32 ft),
(4) +/- 10% When turbidny is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.04ld2h:
(6) - DO s not a stabilization criterion forthe "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7) -ORP 5 not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
`3
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other�101_/
Sample ID:
VA
Date: Vu It
Time: '
Sampling Personnel (circle one): t Daniela Ali
Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): Sun y, Partly Cloudy,, Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Completiop Oro 4l Well Tag Present: Yes,
Well Locked: Yes, Lock Present: Yes,
Well ID info on Tag: es, ; o
Well Bolted: Yes, Well Cap: Yes, N
Well Cap Condition: Goo ,Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: Good, Cracked, Replace, Other: i� Well Location: Grass, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other: l iiiy
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): If Vs k�
Screen Length: 5, 10, 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): ti)
Well Diameter: 2, 4, s, 8
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: PVC, Steel
Purge Rate: mL/min
Sampling Device: Peristaltic, Monsoon, Grundfos, 'I r, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene r
Measuring Point: Top of Casing other: i' ; ,� •, ,
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: L ' Odor: Yes, o
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
(eC)
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
(gallons)
(see note
below)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%4
C
1
�L
Field Parameters measured with:
Official Sampling Date & Time:
YSI Pr2
-
Samples Collected: Analvsis Requested: Preservative
Metals 6010D HNO3
Sulfate 300
TDS 2540c _
Notes:
(1) - Do not measure depth to bottom of well unto after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may be resting on the well bottom
(2)- Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
3)-Total drawdovm in-11 to be less than 0.1 in (0.32 ft). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdo— below0.1 in (0.32 ft).
(4) +/-10% when turbidity is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
IS) -DO Is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)- ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
Hold Time (days): Lab:
28 Pace Analytical
28 Pace Analytical
7 Pace Analytical
►s(lMP) e

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ERM Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, urface Water,~ otable WSW; other)
Sample ID; 5w - d - U/ %, C ^ L
Date:
Time:
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Daniela y--_>
Andrew Jaskowiak
Weather Conditions (circle one): Suzy, Partly Cloudy,
Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Completion 6 ra
- Well Tag Present: Yes, Q0
Well Locked: Yes, .N Lock Present: Yes,
Well ID info on Tag: Yes, o
Well Bolted: Yes, 12 Well Cap: Yes,
Well Cap Condition: Good, Replace, Other:
Well Pad Condition: Good, Cracked, Replace, Other: r!
Well Location: Grass, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other: t-ald
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.):
Screen Length: 5, 10, 15, 20
Depth to Water (D.T.W): (1) �
Well Diameter: 2, 4, 6, 8
V7111
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: PVC, Steel
Purge Rate: 4-1 mL/min
Sampling Device: Peristaltic, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer, Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene
Measuring Point: Top of Casing other: L-Qnd
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: r0v\Je\ Odor: e No y/,'
5 u!tw -d
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC
pH
std units
SPC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria'
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/_
10%4
-
[
[
i-f
fzt
d
s'Y
F
�r
9
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro /
Official Sampling Date & Time: 'T Iy4 i J / W1 Z
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested: Preservative: Hold Time (days): Lab:
Metals 6010D HNO3 28 Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300 28 Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C 7 Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1) -Do not measure depth to bottom of Well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that maybe resting on the Well bottom.
(2)- Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) - Total drawdom in well to be less than 0.1 in (0.32 ft). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep drawdovm below 0.1 m (0.32 ft).
(4) tl- 10%when turbidity is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h,
(6) - DO is not a stabilization crderion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7) -ORP Is not a stabilization crderion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

WATER MATRIX SAMPLING
FIELD DATA FORM
ERM
Site Name: Swift Creek ER`M Project Number: 0397281
Sample Type: (Monitor Well, DPT, Surface Water, Potable WSW; other) l '�ti•�`
Sample ID:
Date: 11Z
Time: 1 15 ' , U
Sampling Personnel (circle one): Daniela Aliy
Andrew Jaskowi
Weather Conditions (circle one): unn , Partly Cloudy, Cloudy, Rain, Other
Well Type: Flush Surface Completion, Stick Up Completion Ay
L Well Tag Present: Yes, (Nod
Well Locked: Yes, N� Lock Present: Yes, N9)
Well ID info on Tag: Yes, ,No)
Well Bolted: Yes, N Well Cap: Yes, cj
Well Cap Condition: Good, Replace, Other:
L u V\—k
Well Pad Condition: Good, Cracked, Replace, Other:
Well Location: Grass, Asphalt, Concrete, Woods, Other:
Additional Comments:
Total Depth of Well (T.D.): )' i
Screen Length: 5, 10, 15, 20 7
Depth to Water (D.T.W): 11) a `>
Well Diameter: 2, 4, 6, 8 iA }
Total Volume Purged:
Casing Type: PVC, Steel
Purge Rate: n mL/min
Sampling Device: Peristaltic, Monsoon, Grundfos, Bailer Other:
Tubing Type: Polyethylene ilyyy
Measuring Point: Top of Casing other:
ido v" 12 P k o
Pump Intake (ft below M.P.):
Color: h Odor: Yes,
6%
Time:
min
Volume
Purged
DTW:
feet
Temp
CC)
pH
std units
SpC
uS/cm
DO
m /L
ORP
mV
Turb
NTU
Comments:
Stabalization
Criteria2
(gallons)
(see note
belOW)3
+/-
3%
+/-
0.1 unit
+/-
3%
+/-
10%
+/-
10 mV
+/-
10%4
Field Parameters measured with: YSI Pro/
z
Official Sampling Date & Time:
Samples Collected: Analysis Requested:
Preservative:
Hold Time (days):
Lab:
Metals 6010D
HNO3
28
Pace Analytical
Sulfate 300
28
Pace Analytical
TDS 2540C
7
Pace Analytical
Notes:
(1)- Do not measure depth to bottom of well until after purging and sampling to reduce resuspending fines that may be resting on the well bottom.
(2) -Stabilization criteria based on three most recent consecutive measurements.
(3) -Total dra„down in well to be less than 0.1 m (0.32 ft). Purging rate to be lowered as necessary to keep dravdovm below 0.1 re (0.32 0).
(4) +I- 10%when turbidity is over 10 NTUs.
(5) Well Volume (gal) = 0.041d2h:
is -DO is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.
(7)- ORP is not a stabilization criterion for the "Groundwater sampling" SESD Standard Operating Procedure.

►lip,,.ERM
APPENDIX C LABORATORY DATA
NOVMEBER 2023

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
December 13, 2023
Chris Means
ERM
300 West Summit Ave
Suite 330
Charlotte, NC 28203
RE: Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Dear Chris Means:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on November 30, 2023. The results relate only
to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the applicable TNI/NELAC Standards and the
laboratory's Quality Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report.
The test results provided in this final report were generated by each of the following laboratories within the Pace Network:
• Pace Analytical Services - Asheville
• Pace Analytical Services - Eden
• Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Matthew Brainard
[e-mail]
704-977-0942
Project Manager
Enclosures
cc: EDDs, Reports, ERM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 1 of 36

Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Pace Analytical Services Ormond Beach
8 East Tower Circle, Ormond Beach, FL 32174
Alaska DEC- CS/UST/LUST
Alabama Certification #: 41320
Colorado Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity
Connecticut Certification #: PH-0216
Delaware Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity
DoD-ANAB MADE-3199
Florida Certification #: E83079
Georgia Certification #: 955
Guam Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity
Hawaii Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity
Illinois Certification #: 200068
Indiana Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity
Kansas Certification #: E-10383
Kentucky Certification #: 90050
Louisiana Certification #: FL NELAC Reciprocity
Louisiana Environmental Certificate #: 05007
Maine Certification #: FL01264
Maryland Certification: #346
Massachusetts Certification #: M-FL1264
Michigan Certification #: 9911
Mississippi Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity
Pace Analytical Services Asheville
2225 Riverside Drive, Asheville, NC 28804
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87648
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37712
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40
Pace Analytical Services Eden
205 East Meadow Road Suite A, Eden, NC 27288
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37738
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
Missouri Certification #: 236
Montana Certification #: Cert 0074
Nebraska Certification: NE-OS-28-14
New Hampshire Certification #: 2958
New Jersey Certification #: FL022
New York Certification #: 11608
North Carolina Environmental Certificate #: 667
North Carolina Certification #: 12710
North Dakota Certification #: R-216
Ohio DEP 87780
Oklahoma Certification #: D9947
Pennsylvania Certification #: 68-00547
Puerto Rico Certification #: FLO1264
South Carolina Certification: #96042001
Tennessee Certification #: TN02974
Texas Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity
US Virgin Islands Certification: FL NELAC Reciprocity
Virginia Environmental Certification #: 460165
West Virginia Certification #: 9962C
Wisconsin Certification #: 399079670
Wyoming (EPA Region 8): FL NELAC Reciprocity
South Carolina Laboratory ID: 99030
South Carolina Certification #: 99030001
Virginia/VELAP Certification #: 460222
North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 633
Virginia/VELAP Certification #: 460025
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 2 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Lab ID
Sample ID
Matrix
Date Collected
Date Received
92700971001
FD-01-WG-
Water
11/29/23 00:00
11/30/23
09:54
92700971002
MW-01D-WG-
Water
11/29/23 14:40
11/30/23
09:54
92700971003
MW-01S-WG-
Water
11/29/23 15:59
11/30/23
09:54
92700971004
MW-02D-WG-
Water
11/29/23 11:25
11/30/23
09:54
92700971005
MW-02S-WG-
Water
11/29/23 12:45
11/30/23
09:54
92700971006
MW-03-WG-
Water
11/29/23 13:20
11/30/23
09:54
92700971007
MW-04-WG-
Water
11/29/23 12:00
11/30/23
09:54
92700971008
MW-05RD-WG-
Water
11/29/23 11:00
11/30/23
09:54
92700971009
MW-05RS-WG-
Water
11/29/23 10:20
11/30/23
09:54
92700971010
MW-06-WG-
Water
11/29/23 09:50
11/30/23
09:54
92700971011
MW-07-WG-
Water
11/29/23 14:45
11/30/23
09:54
92700971012
MW-08-WG-
Water
11/29/23 15:30
11/30/23
09:54
92700971013
SW-01-WG-
Water
11/28/23 14:45
11/30/23
09:54
92700971014
SW-02-WG-
Water
11/29/23 16:42
11/30/23
09:54
92700971015
SW-03-WG-
Water
11/28/23 15:35
11/30/23
09:54
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 3 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project:
Pace Project No.:
Swift Creek
92700971
Analytes
Lab ID
Sample ID
Method
Analysts
Reported
Laboratory
92700971001
FD-01-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
AAM1,TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971002
MW-01D-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971003
MW-01S-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
AAM1,TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971004
MW-02D-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971005
MW-02S-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971006
MW-03-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971007
MW-04-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971008
MW-05RD-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971009
MW-05RS-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971010
MW-06-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 4 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Project:
Swift Creek
Pace Project No.:
92700971
Analytes
Lab ID
Sample ID
Method
Analysts
Reported
Laboratory
EPA 6010
AAM1
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971011
MW-07-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
AAM1
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971012
MW-08-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
AAM1
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971013
SW-01-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971014
SW-02-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
92700971015
SW-03-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
VLG
1
PASI-E
EPA 6010
TMA
7
PASI-O
EPA 7470
JNK
1
PASI-O
EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
CDC
1
PASI-A
PASI-A = Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
PASI-E = Pace Analytical Services - Eden
PASI-O = Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 5 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: FD-01-WG-
Lab ID: 92700971001 Collected: 11/29/23
00:00
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters
Results Units Limit MDL
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
6450 mg/L 250 250
1
12/01/23 15:45
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 22:54
7440-38-2
Barium
188 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 22:54
7440-39-3
Cadmium
0.93J ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 22:54
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 22:54
7440-47-3
Lead
ND ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 22:54
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 22:54
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 2.0
2
12/04/23 11:32
12/06/2310:24
7440-22-4 D3
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/11/2316:04
12/12/2314:43
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
402 mg/L 8.0 4.0
8
12/03/23 07:57
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 6 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-01D-WG-
Parameters
Lab ID: 92700971002 Collected: 11/29/23 14:40
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
880 mg/L 250 250
1
12/01/23 15:45
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:05
7440-38-2
Barium
644 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:05
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:05
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:05
7440-47-3
Lead
ND ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:05
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:05
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 5.0 1.0
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:05
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/11/2316:04
12/12/2314:45
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
15.6 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
12/02/23 22:54
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 7 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-01S-WG-
Lab ID: 92700971003 Collected: 11/29/23
15:59
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters
Results Units Limit MDL
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
5000 mg/L 250 250
1
12/01/23 15:45
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:08
7440-38-2
Barium
188 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:08
7440-39-3
Cadmium
0.95J ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:08
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:08
7440-47-3
Lead
ND ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:08
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:08
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 10.0 2.0
2
12/04/23 11:32
12/06/2310:28
7440-22-4 D3
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 12:32
7439-97-6 M1
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
401 mg/L 8.0 4.0
8
12/03/23 08:53
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 8 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-02D-WG-
Parameters
Lab ID: 92700971004 Collected: 11/29/23 11:25
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 2540C-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
300 mg/L 50.0 50.0
1
12/06/23 11:23
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:11
7440-38-2
Barium
303 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:11
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:11
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:11
7440-47-3
Lead
ND ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:11
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:11
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 5.0 1.0
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:11
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 12:48
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
1.3 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
12/02/23 23:51
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 9 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-02S-WG-
Parameters
Lab ID: 92700971005 Collected: 11/29/23 12:45
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
255 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
12/01/23 14:08
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:15
7440-38-2
Barium
140 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:15
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:15
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:15
7440-47-3
Lead
ND ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:15
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:15
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 5.0 1.0
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:15
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 12:50
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
3.7 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
12/03/23 00:05
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 10 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-03-WG-
Parameters
Lab ID: 92700971006 Collected: 11/29/23 13:20
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
1350 mg/L 250 250
1
12/01/23 15:46
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:18
7440-38-2
Barium
63.2 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:18
7440-39-3
Cadmium
1.5 ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:18
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:18
7440-47-3
Lead
17.9 ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:18
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:18
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 5.0 1.0
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:18
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 12:52
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
492 mg/L 10.0 5.0
10
12/03/23 09:07
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 11 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-04-WG-
Parameters
Lab ID: 92700971007 Collected: 11/29/23 12:00
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
260 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
12/01/23 15:46
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:22
7440-38-2
Barium
149 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:22
7440-39-3
Cadmium
0.64J ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:22
7440-43-9
Chromium
13.1 ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:22
7440-47-3
Lead
33.1 ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:22
7439-92-1
Selenium
5.3J ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:22
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 5.0 1.0
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:22
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
0.74 ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 12:55
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
20.1 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
12/03/23 00:34
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 12 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-05RD-WG-
Parameters
Lab ID: 92700971008 Collected: 11/29/23 11:00
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
189 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
12/01/23 15:45
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:25
7440-38-2
Barium
185 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:25
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:25
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:25
7440-47-3
Lead
ND ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:25
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:25
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 5.0 1.0
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:25
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 12:57
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
10.5 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
12/03/23 01:17
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 13 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-05RS-WG-
Parameters
Lab ID: 92700971009 Collected: 11/29/23 10:20
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
183 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
12/01/23 15:45
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:29
7440-38-2
Barium
80.6 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:29
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:29
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:29
7440-47-3
Lead
ND ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:29
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:29
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 5.0 1.0
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:29
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 12:59
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
2.6 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
12/03/23 01:31
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 14 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-06-WG-
Lab ID: 92700971010 Collected: 11/29/23
09:50
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters
Results Units Limit MDL
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No.
Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
5420 mg/L 250 250
1
12/01/23 15:45
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 50.0 17.0
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:38
7440-38-2
D3
Barium
69.7 ug/L 50.0 4.2
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:38
7440-39-3
Cadmium
2.OJ ug/L 5.0 1.6
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:38
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 25.0 8.5
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:38
7440-47-3
D3
Lead
55.2 ug/L 50.0 10.5
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:38
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 75.0 19.5
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:38
7782-49-2
D3
Silver
ND ug/L 25.0 5.0
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:38
7440-22-4
D3
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 13:06
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
677 mg/L 13.0 6.5
13
12/03/23 09:50
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 15 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-07-WG-
Lab ID: 92700971011 Collected: 11/29/23
14:45
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters
Results Units Limit MDL
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No.
Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
9330 mg/L 250 250
1
12/01/23 15:46
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 50.0 17.0
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:41
7440-38-2
D3
Barium
111 ug/L 50.0 4.2
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:41
7440-39-3
Cadmium
7.1 ug/L 5.0 1.6
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:41
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 25.0 8.5
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:41
7440-47-3
D3
Lead
171 ug/L 50.0 10.5
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:41
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 75.0 19.5
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:41
7782-49-2
D3
Silver
ND ug/L 25.0 5.0
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:41
7440-22-4
D3
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 13:08
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
657 mg/L 10.0 5.0
10
12/05/2312:20
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 16 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: MW-08-WG-
Lab ID: 92700971012 Collected: 11/29/23
15:30
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Report
Parameters
Results Units Limit MDL
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No.
Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
6690 mg/L 250 250
1
12/01/23 15:45
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 50.0 17.0
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:45
7440-38-2
D3
Barium
96.7 ug/L 50.0 4.2
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:45
7440-39-3
Cadmium
4.6J ug/L 5.0 1.6
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:45
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 25.0 8.5
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:45
7440-47-3
D3
Lead
143 ug/L 50.0 10.5
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:45
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 75.0 19.5
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:45
7782-49-2
D3
Silver
ND ug/L 25.0 5.0
5
12/04/2311:32
12/06/2310:45
7440-22-4
D3
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 13:11
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
601 mg/L 16.0 8.0
16
12/03/2310:18
14808-79-8
M1
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 17 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: SW-01-WG-
Parameters
Lab ID: 92700971013 Collected: 11/28/23 14:45
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
120 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
12/01/23 15:44
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:49
7440-38-2
Barium
42.6 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:49
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:49
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:49
7440-47-3
Lead
ND ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:49
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:49
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 5.0 1.0
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:49
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 13:13
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
11.4 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
12/03/23 02:57
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 18 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: SW-02-WG-
Parameters
Lab ID: 92700971014 Collected: 11/29/23 16:42
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
165 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
12/01/23 15:46
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:53
7440-38-2
Barium
26.7 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:53
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:53
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:53
7440-47-3
Lead
ND ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:53
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:53
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 5.0 1.0
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:53
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 13:15
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
6.3 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
12/03/23 03:11
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 19 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Sample: SW-03-WG-
Parameters
Lab ID: 92700971015 Collected: 11/28/23 15:35
Report
Results Units Limit MDL DF
Received: 11/30/23 09:54 Matrix: Water
Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Analytical Method: SM 254OC-2015
Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Total Dissolved Solids
91.0 mg/L 25.0 25.0
1
12/01/23 15:45
6010 MET ICP
Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Arsenic
ND ug/L 10.0 3.4
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:56
7440-38-2
Barium
31.9 ug/L 10.0 0.84
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:56
7440-39-3
Cadmium
ND ug/L 1.0 0.33
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:56
7440-43-9
Chromium
ND ug/L 5.0 1.7
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:56
7440-47-3
Lead
ND ug/L 10.0 2.1
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:56
7439-92-1
Selenium
ND ug/L 15.0 3.9
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:56
7782-49-2
Silver
ND ug/L 5.0 1.0
1
12/04/23 11:32
12/04/23 23:56
7440-22-4
7470 Mercury
Analytical Method: EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 7470
Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Mercury
ND ug/L 0.20 0.14
1
12/12/23 09:38
12/13/23 13:18
7439-97-6
300.0 IC Anions 28 Days
Analytical Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Sulfate
6.0 mg/L 1.0 0.50
1
12/03/23 03:26
14808-79-8
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 20 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
QC Batch: 816688 Analysis Method: SM 2540C-2015
QC Batch Method: SM 2540C-2015 Analysis Description: 2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971001, 92700971002, 92700971003, 92700971006, 92700971007, 92700971008, 92700971009,
92700971010,92700971011,92700971012,92700971013,92700971014,92700971015
METHOD BLANK: 4226930 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971001, 92700971002, 92700971003, 92700971006, 92700971007, 92700971008, 92700971009,
92700971010,92700971011,92700971012,92700971013,92700971014,92700971015
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit MDL Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids mg/L ND 25.0 25.0 12/01/23 15:43
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
4226931
Spike
LCS LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result % Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
250
250 100
90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 4226932
92700971013
Dup
Max
Parameter
Units
Result
Result RPD
RPD Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
120
128
6 25
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 4226933
92700800001
Dup
Max
Parameter
Units
Result
Result RPD
RPD Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
2200
2090
5 25
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 21 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
QC Batch: 816692 Analysis Method: SM 2540C-2015
QC Batch Method: SM 2540C-2015 Analysis Description: 2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971005
METHOD BLANK: 4226939
Matrix:
Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971005
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result
Limit MDL
Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
ND
25.0
25.0 12/01/23 14:07
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
4226940
Spike
LCS LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result % Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
250
258 103
90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 4226941
92701002001
Dup
Max
Parameter
Units
Result
Result RPD
RPD Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
158
159
1 25
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 22 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
QC Batch: 817551 Analysis Method: SM 2540C-2015
QC Batch Method: SM 2540C-2015 Analysis Description: 2540C Total Dissolved Solids
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services - Eden
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971004
METHOD BLANK: 4231422
Matrix:
Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971004
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result
Limit MDL
Analyzed Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
ND
25.0
25.0 12/06/23 11:22
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
4231423
Spike
LCS LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result % Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
250
232 93
90-110
SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 4231424
92700971004
Dup
Max
Parameter
Units
Result
Result RPD
RPD Qualifiers
Total Dissolved Solids
mg/L
300
324
8 25
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 23 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
QC Batch: 972604 Analysis Method: EPA 7470
QC Batch Method: EPA 7470 Analysis Description: 7470 Mercury
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971001, 92700971002
METHOD BLANK: 5350634 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971001, 92700971002
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit MDL Analyzed Qualifiers
Mercury ug/L ND 0.20 0.14 12/12/2313:46
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 5350635
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Mercury ug/L 2 1.9 95 80-120
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 5350636 5350637
MS MSD
35844067010 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Mercury ug/L 0.14U 2 2 1.8 1.8 91 90 75-125 1 20
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 24 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
QC Batch: 972605 Analysis Method: EPA 7470
QC Batch Method: EPA 7470 Analysis Description: 7470 Mercury
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971003, 92700971004, 92700971005, 92700971006, 92700971007, 92700971008, 92700971009,
92700971010,92700971011,92700971012,92700971013,92700971014,92700971015
METHOD BLANK: 5350653 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971003, 92700971004, 92700971005, 92700971006, 92700971007, 92700971008, 92700971009,
92700971010,92700971011,92700971012,92700971013,92700971014,92700971015
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit MDL Analyzed Qualifiers
Mercury ug/L ND 0.20 0.14 12/13/2312:27
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 5350654
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Mercury ug/L 2 1.8 92 80-120
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 5350655 5350656
MS MSD
92700971003 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Mercury ug/L ND 2 2 1.4 1.5 68 70 75-125 2 20 M1
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 25 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
QC Batch: 970800 Analysis Method: EPA 6010
QC Batch Method: EPA 3010 Analysis Description: 6010 MET
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services - Ormond Beach
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971001, 92700971002, 92700971003, 92700971004, 92700971005, 92700971006, 92700971007,
92700971008,92700971009,92700971010,92700971011,92700971012,92700971013,92700971014,
92700971015
METHOD BLANK: 5338932
Matrix:
Water
Associated Lab Samples:
92700971001, 92700971002, 92700971003, 92700971004, 92700971005, 92700971006, 92700971007,
92700971008,92700971009,92700971010,92700971011,92700971012,92700971013,92700971014,
92700971015
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result
Limit
MDL
Analyzed Qualifiers
Arsenic
ug/L
ND
10.0
3.4
12/04/23 22:13
Barium
ug/L
ND
10.0
0.84
12/04/23 22:13
Cadmium
ug/L
ND
1.0
0.33
12/04/23 22:13
Chromium
ug/L
ND
5.0
1.7
12/04/23 22:13
Lead
ug/L
ND
10.0
2.1
12/04/23 22:13
Selenium
ug/L
ND
15.0
3.9
12/04/23 22:13
Silver
ug/L
ND
5.0
1.0
12/04/23 22:13
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 5338933
Spike
LCS
LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Arsenic
ug/L
250
233
93
80-120
Barium
ug/L
250
265
106
80-120
Cadmium
ug/L
25
24.7
99
80-120
Chromium
ug/L
250
253
101
80-120
Lead
ug/L
250
260
104
80-120
Selenium
ug/L
250
242
97
80-120
Silver
ug/L
25
25.7
103
80-120
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 5338934
5338935
MS
MSD
35845119001
Spike
Spike
MS
MSD
MS
MSD
% Rec
Max
Parameter
Units
Result
Conc.
Conc.
Result
Result
% Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD
RPD Qual
Arsenic
ug/L
3AU
250
250
232
233
92
93
75-125
0
20
Barium
ug/L
72.8
250
250
337
335
105
105
75-125
0
20
Cadmium
ug/L
0.33U
25
25
24.6
24.7
98
99
75-125
0
20
Chromium
ug/L
1.7U
250
250
254
254
101
101
75-125
0
20
Lead
ug/L
2.1 U
250
250
260
261
104
104
75-125
0
20
Selenium
ug/L
3.9U
250
250
242
242
97
96
75-125
0
20
Silver
ug/L
1.0U
25
25
25.5
25.7
99
100
75-125
1
20
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 26 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
QC Batch: 816865 Analysis Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
QC Batch Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993 Analysis Description: 300.0 IC Anions
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971001
METHOD BLANK: 4228153
Matrix:
Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971001
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result
Limit MDL
Analyzed Qualifiers
Sulfate
mg/L
ND
1.0
0.50 12/02/2312:30
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
4228154
Spike
LCS LCS
% Rec
Parameter
Units
Conc.
Result % Rec
Limits Qualifiers
Sulfate
mg/L
50
52.6 105
90-110
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4228155 4228156
MS MSD
92701183001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Sulfate mg/L 130 50 50 176 176 91 92 90-110 0 10
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4228157 4228158
MS MSD
92700989010 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Sulfate mg/L 28100 50 50 18800 18700 -18400 -18700 90-110 1 10 M1
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 27 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
QC Batch: 816866 Analysis Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993
QC Batch Method: EPA 300.0 Rev 2.1 1993 Analysis Description: 300.0 IC Anions
Laboratory: Pace Analytical Services -Asheville
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971002, 92700971003, 92700971004, 92700971005, 92700971006, 92700971007, 92700971008,
92700971009,92700971010,92700971011,92700971012,92700971013,92700971014,92700971015
METHOD BLANK: 4228159 Matrix: Water
Associated Lab Samples: 92700971002, 92700971003, 92700971004, 92700971005, 92700971006, 92700971007, 92700971008,
92700971009,92700971010,92700971011,92700971012,92700971013,92700971014,92700971015
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit MDL Analyzed Qualifiers
Sulfate mg/L ND 1.0 0.50 12/02/23 22:25
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: 4228160
Spike LCS LCS % Rec
Parameter Units Conc. Result % Rec Limits Qualifiers
Sulfate mg/L 50 53.3 107 90-110
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4228161 4228162
MS MSD
92700971002 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Sulfate mg/L 15.6 50 50 66.9 68.2 102 105 90-110 2 10
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 4228163 4228164
MS MSD
92700971012 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max
Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual
Sulfate mg/L 601 50 50 655 662 108 122 90-110 1 10 M1
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 28 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALIFIERS
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to dilution of the sample aliquot.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
TNTC - Too Numerous To Count
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit - The lowest concentration value that meets project requirements for quantitative data with known precision and
bias for a specific analyte in a specific matrix.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine decomposes to and cannot be separated from Azobenzene using Method 8270. The result for each analyte is
a combined concentration.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean -Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2 Chloroethylvinyl ether.
A separate vial preserved to a pH of 4-5 is recommended in SW846 Chapter 4 for the analysis of Acrolein and Acrylonitrile by EPA
Method 8260.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Reported results are not rounded until the final step prior to reporting. Therefore, calculated parameters that are typically reported as
"Total" may vary slightly from the sum of the reported component parameters.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TN -The NELAC Institute.
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
D3 Sample was diluted due to the presence of high levels of non -target analytes or other matrix interference.
M1 Matrix spike recovery exceeded QC limits. Batch accepted based on laboratory control sample (LCS) recovery.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC. Page 29 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project:
Pace Project No.:
Swift Creek
92700971
Analytical
Lab ID
Sample ID
QC Batch Method
QC Batch
Analytical Method
Batch
92700971001
FD-01-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971002
MW-01D-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971003
MW-01S-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971004
MW-02D-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
817551
92700971005
MW-02S-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816692
92700971006
MW-03-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971007
MW-04-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971008
MW-05RD-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971009
MW-05RS-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971010
MW-06-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971011
MW-07-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971012
MW-08-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971013
SW-01-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971014
SW-02-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971015
SW-03-WG-
SM 2540C-2015
816688
92700971001
FD-01-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971002
MW-01 D-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971003
MW-01S-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA6010
970851
92700971004
MW-02D-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971005
MW-02S-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971006
MW-03-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971007
MW-04-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971008
MW-05RD-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971009
MW-05RS-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971010
MW-06-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971011
MW-07-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971012
MW-08-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971013
SW-01-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971014
SW-02-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971015
SW-03-WG-
EPA 3010
970800
EPA 6010
970851
92700971001
FD-01-WG-
EPA 7470
972604
EPA 7470
972731
92700971002
MW-01 D-WG-
EPA 7470
972604
EPA 7470
972731
92700971003
MW-01 S-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971004
MW-02D-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971005
MW-02S-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971006
MW-03-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971007
MW-04-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971008
MW-05RD-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971009
MW-05RS-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971010
MW-06-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971011
MW-07-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971012
MW-08-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971013
SW-01-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971014
SW-02-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
92700971015
SW-03-WG-
EPA 7470
972605
EPA 7470
972860
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Page 30 of 36

ceo
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Project: Swift Creek
Pace Project No.: 92700971
Lab ID
Sample ID
QC Batch
Method
QC Batch
92700971001
FD-01-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816865
92700971002
MW-01 D-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971003
MW-01S-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971004
MW-02D-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971005
MW-02S-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971006
MW-03-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971007
MW-04-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971008
MW-05RD-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971009
MW-05RS-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971010
MW-06-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971011
MW-07-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971012
MW-08-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971013
SW-01-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971014
SW-02-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
92700971015
SW-03-WG-
EPA 300.0
Rev 2.1 1993
816866
Date: 12/13/2023 03:31 PM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, LLC.
Analytical Method
Analytical
Batch
Page 31 of 36

a
a (gal) sP�p4 PGAPSMO rB X X X X X X X X X X
(01MOL09) WHOM U401 X X X X X X X X X X
O'OOE AQ eigllnS X X X X X X X X X X
s a �
V
8
b € 1
.g
LL
0
V
� V
Z
tl
G �
1
L
C
-�C R
f
^
4
g
G W
LL
c
QQ
b $
E
Y
—
N
CS
y
=
C
Cc7
03
'
9 W
T
.cT
7c
7c
3c
3C
3
.�
}OaEj6j d
a
c
C}
c3
q
[yJ
ff,
x

_
a
8
Aq
A4 P2UMmPI83" wOlm*wou ucluivasaid
CS
N
TQ474
•i
' `
r
3 to
(Sal) cP!IoS PoAl-210 iglul
VO
(01 volo9) ff"OO f anol
X
X
X
X
X
X
0.00C AV wgnns
X
X
X I
X
X
X
cr
°Gs
4
e
6
.o
All
xa
3
L"
F�N8
VIA
e
�u
hh
v
N
z
_
s�
$g
4�s
9
p
b
gg
g
F
3
p°c
F
O
I
8
c
age 53 OT 3U

urgrurnssnxa
DC# Title: ENV-FRM-HUN1-0063 vOl Sample Condition Upon Receipt
Effective Date: 05/12/2022
Laboratory receiving samples:
Sample
Condifion Client Name:
Upon Receipt project 1!:
Eam
Courier: LJ Fed Ex UUPS U USPS Client
❑ Commercial El Pace ❑Other:
Custody seal Present? ❑ Yes /No Seals Intact? ❑ Yes XO
Packing Material:. El Bubble Wrap El Bubble Bags /None ❑ Other
Thermometer: 91T�
El�'
IR Gun ID: type of Ice: /Wet ❑ Blue
Correction Factor.
Cooler Temp: Add/Subtract ('Cj 0
Cooler Temp Correcte/In
USDA Regulated Soil (, water sample)
Did samples origina ntine zone within the United States: CA, NY, or SC
Kernersvill
Date/initials Person Examining Contents• / 3
Biological Tissue F I
❑ Yes ❑ No NIA
❑ None
Temp should be above freezing to 6'C
❑ Samples out of temp criteria. Samples on ice,cooling process
has begun
Did samples originate from a foreign source (inteK.Ntl
ionally,
including Hawaii and Puerto Ricol? ❑Yes o
Comtnents/Discrepanc :
a
Samples Arrived within Hold Time?
Ofyes
❑ No
❑ WA
2,
Short Hold Time Analysis (02 hr.)?
❑Yes
No
❑ WA
3.
Rush Turn Around Time Requested?
❑ Yes
o
❑ WA
4.
Sufficient Volume?
es
❑ No
❑ N/A
S.
Correct Containers Used?
-Pace Containers Used?
es
245
es
ElNo
❑ No
❑ WA
❑ WA
6.
Containers Intact?
es
❑No
❑N/A
7.
Dissolved analysis: Samples Field Filtered?
❑Yes
❑No
R A
S.
Sample Labels Match COC7
-includesDate/nme/ID/Analysis Matrix:
Yes
❑ No
❑ WA
9.
Headspace in VOA Vials (>5-6mm)?
❑Yes
❑ No
4A
10.
Trip Blank Present?
Trip Blank Custody Seals Present?
❑Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ No
h
❑ Nlaoe
11.
COMMENTS/SAMPLE DISCREPANCY / meie uata itecluirear u res Wrlio
CLIENT NOTIFICATICN9/RESOLUr.t •h' --
Person contacted:
Project Manager SCURF Review:
Project Manager SRF Review:
Lot ID of split container
Date/Time:
Date:
Date:
M4ualfrov Ill• ACAid Pona 'I of O
Page 34 of 36

SCE'
uwm�a raw
DC# Title: ENV-FRM-HUN1-0083 v01 Sample Condition Upon Receipt
Effective Date: 05/12/2022
*Check mark top half of box if pH and/or dechlorination is verified and project #
within the acceptance range for preservation samples.
Exceptions: VOA, Coliform, TOG, 011 and Grease, DRO/8015 (water) DOG, LLHg
**Bottom half of box is to list number of battles
***Check;r<r unpreserved Nitrates for chlorine
'e
r
z
�
u
m
dJ
E
N
io
2
u
m
E
LA
3 rr
Pft m
Z
m
C
u
m
J
E
O
>d4
N
7
is
ILJ
•+
n
m
E
N
v
Sd
�
g
m
u_
J
E
N
c
m
a
iv
2
u
J
E
N
d
m
^
za
r
O
Z
J
E
N
d
m
�
m
I
L
o
WWW
�_
3
�
I
C
7
rl
a
v
a
i-.7
z
'i
a
�
7
J
E
N
49
a
�
v
w
qp
VI
=
b
-
9
a
V
z
a
S
N
m
J
E
w
in
Is
s
.Ur
�
z
a
w
d
J
�'
N
a
0
a
a
w
u
O
J
E
O
Cn
0
a
a`-
Y
m
O
m
t
�j
J
E
O
p�p��
l9
>
Z
Bi
?�yz�I
`
CL
O
7
J
E
O
p�
9
>
z
O
�!
J
E
D
p7,
9
o
a
W
8
N
{
>
J
E
p
p��i
S
o
?
4
N
fft
ac
z
>
R
1
m
W
J
E
N
F
a.
�,
I
IO
m
J
E
a
*,
Qr
N
y
u
L
j
E
N
oNc
d
m
z
n
j
0�
J
E
C
O
>
�
a
y
0
m
C
1A
,J
E
O
>
>
G
E
O
3
a
1�
5
�
1
6
7
�
1
8
9
10
11
'
12
ti
1
T pH Adjustment
Log for Preserved Samples
Sample ID
TVpe of Preservatlae
pH upon receipt
Date preservation adjusted
Time preservation
adjusted
Amount of Preservative
added
Lot #
Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North CaroMa compRance samples, a copy of this formwi 11 be sent to the North Carolina DENRCerdfication Office (i.e.
Out of hold, Incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers.
niPmIFrpv Ir1• AMIA Lane 9 of ?
Page 35 of 36

DC# Title: ENV-FRM-HUN1-0083 v01 Sample Condition Upon Receipt
(�Mptffm-
Effective Date: 0511212022
*Check mark top half of box if pH and/or dechlorination is verified and Project #
within the acceptance range for preservation samples.
Exceptions: VOA, Coliform, TOC, oil and Grease, DRO/8015 (water) DOC, LLHS
* *Bottom half of box is to list number of battles
***Check all unpreserved Nitrates for chlorine
"MM
MEME
211"I'Ll
MEMME
0
LOMME
MEN
on
ME
M
II
Gi■0�aa�■a
�i�ilii��.-�
pH Adjustment
Log for Preserved Samples �~
Sample ID
Type of Preservative
pH upon receipt
Data preservation adjusted
Time preservation
adjusted
Amount of Preservative
added
lot 0
Note: Whenever there Is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form wit be sent to the NOnnCarounautrvnt.ernricatrontmrceii.e.
out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers.
I
I
fliioltrov Nl• AQR1d Donn 9 of 9 i
Page 36 of 36

ERM
ERM HAS OVER 160 OFFICES ACROSS THE FOLLOWING
COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES WORLDWIDE
Argentina
The Netherlands
ERM Charlotte
Australia
New Zealand
300 West Summit Avenue
Suite 330
Belgium
Peru
Charlotte, NC, 28206
Brazil
Poland
T: 704-541-8345
Canada
Portugal
China
Romania
www.erm.com
Colombia
Senegal
France
Singapore
Germany
South Africa
Ghana
South Korea
Guyana
Spain
Hong Kong
Switzerland
India
Taiwan
Indonesia
Tanzania
Ireland
Thailand
Italy
UAE
Japan
UK
Kazakhstan
US
Kenya
Vietnam
Malaysia
Mexico
Mozambique