19047-Performance Fibers-EMP for FXGD - signed

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener.
The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable
regulatory guidance.
Voluntary Metrics Tab
The NC Brownfields Program updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields
Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever
possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital
investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the Brownfields
Property:
1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: To be provided at later date
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: See above
b. Full Time Post -Redevelopment Jobs: See above
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION........................................................................................................................ 4
COMMUNICATIONS................................................................................................................................
4
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM...............................................................................
5
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS........................................................................................................................ 5
CONTAMINATED MEDIA......................................................................................................................... 8
PART1. Soil.........................................................................................................................................
9
PART 2. GROUNDWATER.................................................................................................................
18
PART 3. SURFACE WATER..................................................................................................................
19
PART 4. SEDIMENT............................................................................................................................
20
PARTS. SOIL VAPOR.........................................................................................................................
20
PART6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR........................................................................................................
21
PART 7. INDOOR AIR.........................................................................................................................
22
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM.............................................................................................
22
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials .....................
23
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING.....................................................................................................
25
APPROVAL SIGNATURES.......................................................................................................................
26
2
EMP Version 2, January 2021

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
® Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
® A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
® A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
® Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
® A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.
❑ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
® A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
® Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
® Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
® If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
® Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
❑ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
❑ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 12/3/2021 Revision Date (if applicable):
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Performance Fibers
Brownfields Project Number: 19047-15-019
Brownfields Property Address: Lot 1 - 338 Pea Ridge Rd, New Hill, Chatham County
Brownfields Property Area (acres): +/- 421.65 - Acres
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes © No
If yes enter Permit No.: ''IirU r,r fin horo +n on r text
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit............ ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): Eco Tip West, LLC
Contact Person: Mr. Jason Kaplan
Phone Numbers: Office: 303.516.3478 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Contractor for PD: SAMET Corporation
Contact Person: Brian Hall
Phone Numbers: Office: 336.544.2643 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Environmental Consultant: Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
Contact Person: Jeffrey Tyburski
Phone Numbers: Office: 919.424.1832
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Samuel Watson
Phone Numbers: Office: 910.796.7408
Email: [e-mail]
Mobile: [phone]
Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior
Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours
Installation of mitigation systems: ................................................................ 10 days Prior
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies toimplement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
❑Residential ❑Recreational ❑Institutional ❑Commercial ❑Office ❑Retail ®industrial
El Other specify:
This EMP has been prepared specifically to support the construction of the proposed tenant
distribution center (herein referred to as Lot 1 or Site) located on the western portion of the
Brownfields Property as depicted in Figure 1. This will be the first of several tenant build -out
5
EMP Version 2, January 2021

projects on the Brownfields Property and separate EMPs will be developed for each tenant build -
out. This EMP is intended to compliment the approved 9 August 2021 EMP for installation of
primary utilities onto the Site.
For the Lot 1 Site, construction activities will generally include management of the documented
AOC (Area) #37 construction debris fill area as described in previous assessment reports, Site
grading, subsurface utility installation and foundation construction within the limits of the
proposed area (Figure 1). This EMP will also include options to potentially stockpile soil and
obtain fill soil on/from other portions of the Brownfields Property. Current plans indicate that
there are sufficient volumes of soil available on the Brownfields Property to avoid the need to
import soil from off -site sources for Lot 1 construction activities. As such, a soil import plan is not
included as part of this EMP. If import of soil from an off -Site source is needed, a separate plan
will be provided as an addendum to this EMP. Import of stone aggregate from off -site approve
quarries is included in this EMP.
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities
at the site:
® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
❑ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
® Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
See attached Figure 1 for the location and layout of the proposed facility for Lot 1. Figure 1 also
provides the approximate location of existing features on the entire Brownfields Property (i.e.
portion of the Brownfields Property outside of the Lot 1 Site) including the remaining concrete
slab, existing buildings, Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) and associated ponds and
lagoons, and existing inert debris pile.
Construction of Lot 1 will include the following:
• Undercut and removal of the debris from Area #37 to the proposed Construction Debris
Storage Area to the north of Lot 1 (Figure 1). Concrete, asphalt and soil with no field
evidence of impacts will be stockpiled in the Construction Debris Storage Area. Based on
available information and pending additional stockpile sampling, this inert material and
soil mixture will be available for possible reuse on other portions of the Brownfields
Property. Items such as sheet metal, fabric and potentially impacted soil or other similar
material not potentially suitable for reuse on other portions of the Brownfields Property
will be segregated for off -site disposal.
• An estimated 95,000 cubic yards of soil will be excavated during Site grading and
EMP Version 2, January 2021

undercut of unsuitable soils (U) and excavation of proposed Water Quality Devices
(WQD) on Lot 1. Excess soils will be used, in part, to backfill Area #37. Remaining excess
soils will be stockpiled on other portions of the Brownfields Property in the Fill Area #1
and/or Fill Area #2 areas shown on Figure 1. The WWTP (including ponds/lagoons) will
remain operational during initial construction of Lot 1. As such, soils stockpiled in Fill
Area #1 will not be placed in the ponds/lagoons, but will be available for future WWTP
closure. Fill Area #2 will also be available for stockpiling as needed. Future EMPs for
other tenant build -out lots on the Brownfields Property will be able to access these
stockpiled materials for potential reuse.
• Beneficial or managed reuse of concrete and asphalt on Lot 1 will not be conducted.
Remaining concrete and asphalt will be reused on other portions of the Brownfields
Property under separate plans. If the need arises for managed reuse of concrete and
asphalt on Lot 1, it will be included under a separate plan as an addendum to this EMP.
• The overall soils an inert debris management strategy is to reuse these materials on the
Brownfields Property. The EMP includes a provision to potentially export excess soils and
material to a nearby non-Brownfields sister Site (TIP-2).
• The WWTP will remain operational until the remaining concrete slabs on Lot 2 are
removed at a later date per a separate pending EMP. To support development of Lot 1,
the existing wastewater line on the southern edge of the proposed building will be
decommissioned. A temporary line will be constructed in it's place to keep the WWTP
operational
• Current assessment data does not indicate an unacceptable vapor intrusion risk for Lot 1.
As such, and pending North Carolina Brownfields Program (NCBP) approval, design and
installation of a Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) will not be included for
redevelopment of Lot 1.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ Residential ® Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 12/6/2021
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
12 months
c) Additional phases planned? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: lick or tap to enter a date.
NA — Lot 1 will be constructed under one phase of work
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
cock or tap nere to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 11/1/2022
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ..............................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 2. Groundwater: ............................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 3. Surface Water: ..........................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 4. Sediment: ...................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ..................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: ..................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 7. Indoor Air: ...................................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
® Suspected
❑ Unknown
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
8
EMP Version 2, January 2021

PART 1. Soil
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Assessment results for Lot 1 indicate little to no impacts from historical Site industrial activities.
Contaminants, primarily metals, appear to localized and potentially naturally occurring. Potential
exists for relatively low concentrations of petroleum and chlorinated solvents to be present as
documented in previous assessment reports.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Impacts, if present, are likely to be associated with the construction and debris type fill in Area
#37. This fill generally appears to be located within five feet of the current land surface. Isolated
impacts, I present, may also potentially be associated with the wastewater line. The remainder of
the Lot 1 Site is likely to have not been impacted at unacceptable levels by historical operations.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
The total disturbed acreage of the Lot 1 Site is 45.828.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Maximum 15 feet BLS
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
An estimated 95,000 cubic yards of soil will be excavated during Site grading and undercut of
unsuitable soils (U) and excavation of proposed Water Quality Devices (WQD) on Lot 1. Excess
soils will be used, in part, to backfill Area #37. Remaining excess soils will be stockpiled in the Fill
Area #1 and/or Fill Area #2 areas on adjacent portions of the Brownfields Property as shown on
Figure 1. The WWTP (including ponds/lagoons) will remain operational during initial construction
of Lot 1. As such, soils stockpiled in Fill Area #1 will not be placed in the ponds/lagoons, but will
be available for future WWTP closure. Fill Area #2 will also be available for stockpiling as needed.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
The volume of soil impacted by contaminants cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but is
likely to be limited to localized areas. As described in this EMP, measures to manage potentially
impacted soil will be included in the event that field observations indicate the potential presence
of impacted soil during Site work.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Assumption - Likely less than 5,000 cubic yards and will likely be limited to soil mixed with debris
that is unsuitable for potential reuse.
Part I.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
EMP Version 2, January 2021

provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminarydata available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ❑Yes ®No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
..IIL.K UI Ldp IICIC LU CIILUI LCXL
❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED -IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ❑ Yes © No
❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability Click or tap nere to enter texL
❑ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Toxicity Fick or tap here to enter text.
❑ TCLP results 'lick or tap here to enter text.
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.
® If no, explain rationale:
Based on existing assessment data maintained by NCDEQ
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
10
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
® Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.
Additional comments:
Based on available data, if construction activities encounter contaminated soil, it will likely be
limited in area and volume. As described in the following section, field screening will be used
to evaluate if soils and debris appear to be non -impacted and can be reused as backfill on
other portions of the Brownfields Property.
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
® Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
® Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
°-'. -, �,_ k-,- �_ -rater teXL
® Manage soil under impervious cap ® or clean fill
® Describe cap or fill:
Impervious surface such as pavement or concrete, buildings, or 2 feet of fill that is
acceptable for reuse as surface cover soils.
® Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if
actions are Post -Recordation).
® GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
® Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
Survey data as needed
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
® Yes, describe the method will include:
Standard construction techniques for dust control.
❑ No, explain rationale:
lick or `-- '--- `- inter text.
11
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Field Screening of site soil
® Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
Click or tap here to enter text.
During construction, an EP will be present for initial excavation activities to make field
observations and field screen soils using PID headspace and ambient air methods to
evaluate for evidence of impacts, particularly during excavation of sol and debris from Area
#37, soils adjacent to the WWTP waste water line, and management of soils in the deepest
excavation areas and closest to known/potential contaminant sources associated with
previous industrial use of the site. The level of on -site EP oversight may decrease if initial
screening results consistently suggest a lack of impacts.
Based on previously discussed existing assessment data, it is unlikely that an EP will be
required on -Site for all earthwork activities. Based on initial observations during
construction, the EP will work with the PD and construction personnel (Contractor) to
determine the scope and frequency for subsequent oversight to reasonably document that
remaining soils are managed in accordance with this EMP. This may include moving to
standby and allowing the site Contractor or contractor designated representative to
provide primary oversight of construction activities. The Contractor or designated
representative will notify the EP if field conditions are encountered that could indicate the
potential presence of impacted soil (i.e. staining). While on standby, the Contractor of
designated representative will fill out a weekly log approved by the EP and provide photo
log (as necessary) to document Brownfields Property conditions. The weekly reports will be
included in a final EMP Implementation Report at the end of the project. While on standby,
the EP will initially make weekly site visits, at a minimum, to document Brownfields
Property conditions reported by the Contractor. The need and frequency of standby EP
visits will be adjusted as needed based on site conditions encountered during site
construction.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter
Soil Sample Collection
® Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Based on previously described assessment results, no additional sample collection is
currently planned unless the following conditions are encountered:
Field Evidence of Potential Soil Impacts: If field evidence indicate the potential presence
of soil impacts that are not consistent with previous assessment findings, the soil will
either be 1) transported to a NCDEQ permitted facility for disposal; or 2) sampled and
12
EMP Version 2, January 2021

evaluated as potential on -Site fill. Under these conditions, the soil will be stockpiled for
sampling. Segregation methods utilized by the Contractor to separate debris and/or use
roll -off boxes. Stockpiling will be conducted in general accordance with NCDEQ guidance
using the analytical laboratory methods included in this EMP for import sampling.
Additional Data to Support Soil Export to Another Site (TIP-2): Based on current site
grading plans, this scenario is considered unlikely. However, if excess soil is generated
during site grading, additional soil sampling may potentially be needed to support export
of soil to the TIP-2 non-Brownfields property or potentially another Brownfields property
as beneficial fill and/or fill. Sampling would only be conducted if additional data is needed
to evaluate if Brownfields Property soil increases risk at the receiving property. Primary
reliance on existing Phase II Assessment data will be used be used to satisfy this
requirement. If necessary, stockpile sampling will be conducted in accordance with
NCDEQ guidance using the analytical laboratory methods included in this EMP for import
sampling to support this effort. Additional details are provided under the Soil Export
section of this EMP.
Soil Import to Lot 1 Site From Other Portions of Brownfields Property: If additional soil is
needed for construction work on the Lot 1 Site, the soil will either be obtained from the
Stockpile of soil already developed from previous Lot 1 construction work or it will be
obtained from the construction of the other WQD, undercut and/or Cut areas identified
on Figure 1. An EP will screen soils for evidence of impacts prior to placement. If soils
from other portions of the Brownfields Property are needed, they will be placed at depth
at least two feet below final grade elevation. If soils will be used to establish the final two
feet of final grade, they will either be from previously sampled stockpiled soil with
acceptable laboratory test results (i.e. per risk calculator evaluation) or they will be
sampled in -situ per final landscape sampling.
❑ No, explain rationale:
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
13
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Click or tap here to enter text
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Antimony by EPA Method 6020, Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199, and
1,4-Dioxane by 8260 SIM.
® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
Stockpiling will be performed per Figure 1 of this EMP as needed for soils identified by the EP as being
potentially impacted based on field screening methods.
® Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all thatapply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
(-Iirk or ten horn to enter tovl
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Click or tag_ sere to enter text Antimony by EPA Method 6020, Hexavalent
chromium by EPA Method 7199, and 1,4-Dioxane by 8260 SIM.
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
A work plan will be submitted under separate cover pending field observations during
construction.
❑ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
14
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Part 1.13. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................ ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (if a range
of depths, please list the range.)
Click or tap here to enter text.
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use atthe Brownfields property.
Click or tap here to enter text
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
vi LaN 11C1 c w c11Lcl LcAL.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
15
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Click or tap here to enter text
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
It is estimated that rock quarry aggregate will be imported to the onto the Brownfields Property.
Available information indicates that imported soils will not be imported onto the Brownfields
Property. Stone aggregate will obtained from Wake Stone Corporation or another NCBP approve -
quarry.
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
At this time, if impacted soil is encountered, the soil will be exported to a NCDEQ permitted
facility for disposal purposes.
Additional Data to Support Soil Export to Another Site (TIP-2): Based on current site grading
plans, this scenario is considered unlikely. However, if excess soil is generated during site
grading, additional soil sampling may potentially be needed to support export of stockpiled soil
to the TIP-2 non-Brownfields property or potentially another Brownfields property as beneficial
fill and/or fill. Sampling would only be conducted if additional data is needed to evaluate if
Brownfields Property soil increases risk at the receiving property. Stockpile sampling will be
conducted in accordance with NCDEQ guidance using the analytical laboratory methods included
in this EMP for import sampling to support this effort. Additional NCBP and Solid Waste Section
correspondence and approval may be required to establish data needs and sampling frequency.
The sampling strategy and level of effort for sampling both export soils and background soil
conditions on receiving sites (as needed) will likely depend on the characteristics of the receiving
site. Additional correspondence will be used to establish a final sampling frequency of 1 sample
per 250, 500, 750, or 1,000 cubic yards or other approved sampling ratio.
16
EMP Version 2, January 2021

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
® Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
® Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
® Landfarm or other treatment facility
❑ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and thata record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
® Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
See Item 1 under this Section Figure 2 provides the location of the TIP-2 potential soil export
Site. Note that beneficial/managed reuse of concrete and asphalt from the Brownfields
Property to the TIP-2 property may potentially be requested. If so, this will be conducted under
a separate EMP and/or document for NCBP approval.
Part I.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
® Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is nota
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.
® Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
® If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility
corridors will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:
17
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Per the approved 9 August 2021 EMP utility EMP Trench dams will be constructed for the main
line water, sewer, electrical, natural gas and communication line excavations that are backfilled
with a stone aggregate to mitigate the potential risk of lateral vapor migration outside the of
the area of the documented groundwater plume. Please refer to this EMP for additional details.
❑ If no, include rationale here:
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Potentially impacted soils will not be placed back into trenched if they represent a potential vapor
risk.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Available data reports that the approximate groundwater depth is between 1 to 18 feet bgs.
However, underlying Triassic geological conditions may be creating confined groundwater
conditions, and as such, the actual depth of groundwater is likely to be at greater depths. Based
on this information, excavations are anticipated not to encounter the water table. Field
observations during construction will be used to confirm this assumption.
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ®onsite ❑offsite ❑both or ❑unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Yes — as documented in assessment reports maintained by the NCBP
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
On the western portion of the Brownfields Property, estimated groundwater flow will follow
topography moving west-southwest. On the eastern portion of the Brownfields Property,
estimated groundwater flow will follow topography moving east -south east.
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, describe these activities:
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewateringof groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
In the event that groundwater is encountered, it will be displaced in the excavation and/or
pumped into a tanker truck, frac tank or other container approved by the EP. Sampling and
analysis will be conducted by the EP as needed to characterize the water for disposal purposes
18
EMP Version 2, January 2021

based on the requirements of the disposal facility. The on -site wastewater treatment plant
(WWTP) may be used to treat containerized groundwater pending analytical results and
regulatory approval.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property? ................. ❑X Yes ❑ No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?.................................................................................................................. ❑Yes ®No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
® Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
® Location of existing monitoring wells marked
® Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
® Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
Monitoring wells will be protected and abandoned on an as -needed basis.
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER
1) Is surface water present at the property? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ® Yes ❑ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
Available information indicates impacted surface water is not present at the Site. As such,
impacted surface water scenarios would only occur during a rainfall event during excavation
19
EMP Version 2, January 2021

activities that encounter potentially impacted soil. If areas of impacted soil are encountered
during construction, as needed, they will be covered with plastic by the Contractor to prevent
direct contact with rain/surface water while soil grading activities are occurring. Stockpiles will
be managed per Figure 1 of this EMP. If applicable, water that has contacted impacted soil will
be contained on -site using diking, trenching and/or will be allowed to infiltrate into soils or
placed into a tanker truck, frac tank or other storage container by the Contractor as approved by
the EP. Pending regulatory approval, the waste water lagoons may also potentially be utilized to
manage storm water from construction areas. If needed, water will be sampled by the EP for
laboratory analysis to evaluate handling/disposal options. Sampling and analysis will be
conducted based on the requirements of the disposal facility. As needed, the impacted area will
be covered by at least two feet of soils that are not impacted by contaminants at unacceptable
levels.
PART 4. SEDIMENT
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ® Yes ❑ No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Not applicable — no evidence of impacted sediment on the Lot 1 Site.
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
20
EMP Version 2, January 2021

screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
Approximately 6.0 feet below ground surface.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during
redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list
activities for management of such contact:
Ventilate utility trenches in areas where soil vapors may be encountered and conduct field
monitoring to evaluate associated health and safety risks.
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in sub -slab soil vapor:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown
2) Groundwater:..... ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor
concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ❑0-6 inches ®Other, please
describe:
No sub -slab conditions are present at the Lot 1 Site. However, a soil gas investigation was
performed by Geosyntec at the Site between 13 and 17 September 2021 to evaluate soil gas
conditions at the Brownfields Property, including the Lot 1 Site. The assessment report is currently
under review by NCBP.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
❑ If no, include rationale here:
--'- - --- ­ -- - text.
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
As mentioned in question 3 of this section, the soil gas investigation report is under review by
NCBP and results suggest there is no unacceptable vapor intrusion risk for the non-residential
21
EMP Version 2, January 2021

worker for the Lot 1 Site and the Brownfields Property. In the event that soil vapor is
encountered, ventilating of utility trenches in areas where sub -slab vapors may be encountered
and conducting field monitoring to evaluate associated health and safety risks.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
❑ If no, include rationale here:
No buildings are located on Lot 1 with the exception of a small maintenance building that will be
demolished during construction. As described under Part 6, assessment activities conducted to -
date suggest there is no unacceptable vapor intrusion risk for the non-residential worker for the
Lot 1 Site.
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
Not Applicable
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
® If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre -occupancy sampling, as
necessary:
Additional soil gas/sub-slab testing may potentially be conducted to further evaluate VI risk to
confirm assessment results.
If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or ❑ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
22
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Click or tap here to enter tex`
Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
EPA Method 6020
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Cli& or tar, here to en+or fn, f
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
® Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Antimony by EPA Method 6020, Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199, and 1,4-
Dioxane by 8260 SIM.
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
WWTP Waste Water Line Decommissioning: The waste water line on the central portion of Lot 1
will need to be decommissioned during construction. This will include using a bladder or equivalent
23
EMP Version 2, January 2021

to seal off the downgradient portion of the pipe to prevent sludge and sediment from flowing into
the WWTP lagoon system. Once the waste water line has been reasonably sealed, sections of the
lines will be removed. Interior sludges and water will be removed using a vacuum truck and
pressure washer. Plastic sheeting will be used, as applicable, to minimize the contact of pipe
contents with surrounding soils. If soils are impacted by pipe contents, they will be excavated for
sampling and/or disposal per the requirements set forth in this EMP. The EMP will provide oversight
of the waste water line decommissioning process using the field screening procedures described in
this EMP to evaluate Site conditions to support construction activities. The EP will provide approvals
for the excavation to be backfilled.
Underground Storage Tanks:
Available information indicates that it is unlikely for USTs to be
present at the site. In the unlikely event that a UST is identified, UST closure and corrective action
will be followed per applicable NCDEQ UST Section regulations and guidance. This may include the
use of a mobile laboratory with Ultra -Violet Fluorescent (UVF) capabilities to help determine the
extent of impacts in the field. Confirmatory soil samples will be collected from four sidewalls and at
least one base sample (depending on size) of the final excavation. Confirmation analysis will include
VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, RCRA Metals by EPA Methods 6020 and
7471, and Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199, as applicable, to meet NCBP requirements.
Additional analysis may include those listed in UST Section Guidance, Table 3. Approved Methods
for Soil Analyses at Petroleum UST Closures and Over -Excavation and at Site Checks
(https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Waste%20Management/DWM/UST/Corrective%20Action/ACA%20table
s%20Ch ng3 % 20112013. pdf).
Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
Because of the historical use of the Brownfields Property, it is unlikely for sub -grade features/pits to
be encountered beyond what has already been identified under previous assessment reports. In the
event that such features are identified, they will be handled under Guidelines for Assessment and
Cleanup of Contaminated Sites (NCDEQ IHSB, January 2020)
(https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Waste%20Management/DWM/SF/IHS/guidance/IHSB RemediationGuid
ance012720.pdf)
Buried Waste Material — Note that if buried waste, non-native fill, or any obviously filled materials
is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Program must be notified to determine if investigation of
landfill gases is required:
The NCBP will be notified in the event that buried wastes are encountered other than for the
conditions previously described in this EMP. Work will be stopped and plans will be conducted to
evaluate the waste if the EP believes that the characteristics of the material is inconsistent with data
from previous assessment reports.
Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site:
Grossly impacted soils will not be re -used on -Site. Per the procedures identified in this EMP, the EP
will screen soils to evaluate the presence of impacts, if any, and appropriate re -use scenarios.
24
EMP Version 2, January 2021

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part I.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on -site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
NA
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on Click or tap to enter a date.
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
❑X Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
25
EMP Version 2, January 2021

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: Click or tap here to enter text.
Brownfields Project Name: lick or tap here to enter text.
n (Dec 6, 202114:40 MST
Prospective Developer: Click or tap here to enter text. Date Click or tap to enter a date.
Printed Name/Title/Company: Click or tap here to enter text.
Digitally signed by Jeffrey
J eff rey Tyb u rs ki Tyburski
Date: 2021.12.03 16:41:19-05'00'
Consultant: Click or tap here to enter text. Date Click or tap to enter a date.
Printed Name/Title/Company: Jeffrey Tyburski, PG (Nc), RSM/
Principal / Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
Brownfields Project Manager:Click or tap here to enter text. Date Click or tap to enter a date.
26
EMP Version 2, January 2021

FIGURES

Figure 1
NCBP Diagram for Temporary
Containment of Impacted or Potentially
Impacted Soil
Cross -Section View
Top Plastic Cover Sheeting: Underliner: 1 layer, minimum of 10
(1 Layer, minimum: 10 mil thick) mil thick plastic
Berm
(Straw bales,
composted earth, etc.)
Land
Surface
\ x
Straw Bale Berm
Contaminated Soils
Map View
Uo o0*1- - -37
�L..
""' Contaminated Soils
Weight
(If plastic
cover used)
I' \
Weight
.......................................................
aO Plastic
Sheeting
Note: Adapted from NC DEQ UST Section "Guidelines for Ex Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013
27
EMP Version 2, January 2021

LEGEND
_ - J /, -i,
+ + + + + + + I i \\ \ ��
+ + + + + + + +I I
+ + + + + + /
+ + -CUT+ +
+ + + + + I I r
+ + + + +
—�+ + + + + + 00,
+ + + + + W.Q.D. I l
+ LOT
+
+ + + + + + t
+ + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + +
1 _
IINERT -- -- ----�� I �— —l.�-\
MAT.
. 1
10
EXISTING I /
. O INERT
D I MATERIAL
AREA /
Cy
AREA #37
INACTIVE
1 CONSTRUCTION e I EX. CONCRETE
RUBBLE SITE I I , SLAB \\ \
' o W.Q. D. 1 �1
1
❑ I ••
/i' J I
II �ELEC.
LOT 1 --_— /
I I � SUB.
IF 11=11
' +++++ +++++ + o
+++++ ++++++'_ ++ \ \
r + + + + +- + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+:+:+:+:+:1 +:+:+:+++++1 �:+:+) I I W . Q . D . \
+++++ +++++ / \
- - - I +++++++++.1 +++++++++++1 l
+ + + + + - + + + + + - p /
f + + + + + + + + + +
r + + + + + + - / \
140' WATER INTAKE AND _ �+ J ++ + + + + +
+
SEWER DISCHARGE + ++. ++, + + +. +
EASEMENT
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — • (++++++� *+++++++ I / / ++++ ++++I I c� /
FILL AREA
CUT AREA
UNSUITABLE SOIL
PROPOSED WATER QUALITY DEVICE
CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS STORAGE
INERT MATERIAL STORAGE
EXISTING ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION
++ +'+++'+++++++ EXISTING PONDS
EXISTING STRUCTURE
EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB
SITE CONCEPT
AREA #37 INACTIVE CONSTRUCTION RUBBLE SITE
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
+ + 1 ++++- ++++
, 1 ++++++-----�
+++ +++ /
++
++
++++ ++++ ++++++
+ ++ +++
++ ++ + ++-
++
++
++'
+ ++ ++++ ++++
++ ++ ++
++
\\ t W.Q.D. I ++ \\`
+ + \
\\ I\
\ \\ \ + ++ ++ I \
++ ++ ++ ++
\ I + + ++ +++ ++ .000,
\
\ ++ ++
7 \ \ I I Izi
vi.7
C
I I \
000
000
\ \ 1 —
1
SAMET
CORPORATION
P.O. Box 8050
Greensboro, NC
27419
[phone]
FAX:
[phone]
lu
i�
�
l
O
tu
O
n�
REVISIONS
DRAWN BY: DR
BY
CHECKED BY: BH
DATE: NOV. 2, 2021
SCALE: I °=200'
JOB NUMBER:
SHEET NUMBER:
THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF
SAMET CORPORATION AND IS NOT TO
BE MODIFIED OR REPRODUCED IN PART
OR WHOLE WITHOUT EXPRESSED
WRITTEN PERMISSION.
COPYRIGHT 2021.
OF:

2021-12-03 FINAL E M P for FXG D
Final Audit Report 2021-12-06
Created:
2021-12-06
By:
Holly Van Norman ([e-mail])
Status:
Signed
Transaction ID:
CBJCHBCAABAA965CEf2J8wpxLWUPeghivowjrx42FtF_
"2021-12-03 FINAL EMP for FXGD" History
Document digitally presigned by Jeffrey Tyburski [e-mail])
2021-12-03 - 9:41:19 PM GMT- IP address: 149.20.196.9
Document created by Holly Van Norman ([e-mail])
2021-12-06 - 8:25:46 PM GMT- IP address: 149.20.196.10
Py Document emailed to Jason Kaplan [e-mail]) for signature
2021-12-06 - 8:38:55 PM GMT
Email viewed by Jason Kaplan [e-mail])
2021-12-06 - 9:39:30 PM GMT- IP address: 104.28.104.127
Document e-signed by Jason Kaplan [e-mail])
Signature Date: 2021-12-06 - 9:40:28 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 174.198.136.238
Agreement completed.
2021-12-06 - 9:40:28 PM GMT
a Adobe Sign