7407_Pitt_C&DLandfillInc_CDLF_Phase1_ASDAddendum_FID1833653_20240404

� `.�E SOt�TiO
W � cZn
h
OQ
ONMFNT & DEVE�'
ELM Site Solutions, Inc.
P. O. Box 97607
Raleigh, North Carolina 27624
Phone: [phone]
April 3, 2024
submitted via electronic mail
Ms. Jaclynne Drummond
Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
RE: Alternate Source Demonstration (ASD) Report Addendum
C&D Landfill, Inc.
Permit #: 7407-CDLF-2001/2009
Dear Ms. Drummond:
Following our discussion on the above -referenced topic, this correspondence provides additional
information to supplement the ASD Report submitted to the department in December 2023.
Attached are the following documents:
1. Data Tables
a.
Table A
— ASD Field Parameters
b.
Field Parameter Data Sheets
c.
Table B
— ASD Soil Analytical Results
d.
Table C
— ASD Groundwater Analytical Results
e.
Table D
— ASD GSI Piezometer Analytical Results
f.
Table E
— ASD GSI Surface Water Analytical Results

Ms. Jaclynne Drummond
ASD Report Addendum
April 3, 2024
2. Site Figures
a. Figures 1 through 4 compare groundwater -surface water interaction (GSI) metals of
interest (MOI) data to local groundwater and surface water data noting:
i. all data is unfiltered; and
ii. data shows attenuation across the groundwater -surface water interface.
b. Figure 5 shows a time -trend analysis at the site's compliance surface water
sampling locations (SW-1, SW-2, SW-3 and SW-4) from 2017 through 2023 noting:
i. all data is unfiltered;
ii. MOI concentrations are correlated to turbidity;
iii. SW-1 and SW-4, background conditions prevail; and
iv. all surface water features are intermittent and supported by groundwater
where available.
Based on the attached documents, our conclusions are:
• MOls are naturally attenuated before groundwater discharges to surface water.
• Turbidity inflates total MOI concentrations in surface water. Future surface water sampling,
if necessary, should include both the total and dissolved (filtered) MOI fractions.
• These data are consistent with the ASD Report conclusions:
o The observed MOTs in groundwater and surface water are naturally occurring.
o The elevated detections are due to infiltration through disturbed native soils used for
covering, shaping and grading.
o Once in groundwater, significant dissolved phase MOI transport is not apparent.
Please contact us if you have any questions or if additional information is required.
Sincerely,
ELM Site Solutions, Inc.
Rusty Norris, PE, PLS, RSM
Senior Engineer
c Judson Whitehurst
`,

Table A
Stabilized Groundwater Field Parameter Measurements - September 2023
C&D Landfill, Inc. Construction and Demolition Debris Landfill
Greenville, North Carolina
Sample ID
Volume
Purged
(Gallons)
Temperature
(degrees C)
pH (SU)
Specific
Conductivity
(US/CM)
Turbidity
(NTU)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
Oxidation
Reduction
Potential
(mV)
Ferrous Iron
(mg/L)*
PZ-1
3.5
20.9
4.91
48.0
54.9
3.21
58.4
0.5
PZ-2
3.0
21.9
6.57
3326
0.6
0.17
-121
2.0
PZ-3
3.5
20.4
5.47
160.6
2.1
1.61
196
0.0
PZ-4
3.5
20.2
6.97
3141
30.9
0.50
-116
3.5
PZ-5
4.25
20.9
5.38
138.0
13.1
0.44
55.0
0.0
PZ-8
2.25
21.3
6.93
3051
9.1
1.00
-119
7.0
PZ-9A
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
PZ-10
3.25
20.1
6.83
2815
24.7
1.23
-91.7
6.0
PZ-11
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
MW-2S
3.25
22.0
6.00
2400
1.0
0.14
-117
3.0
MW-3A
3.75
22.1
5.83
2430
2.4
0.16
-169
3.0
MW-3S
2.75
22.8
6.03
3360
2.5
0.43
-182
3.0
MW-5
1.75
25.0
6.74
1412
3.8
0.35
-83.4
5.0
MW-6
3.5
21.0
6.06
1500
7.1
0.15
-130
4.0
MW-8
4.5
21.5
6.76
3326
1.8
0.00
-195
3.0
MW-12S
2.0
22.6
6.90
3609
0.7
0.07
-169
1.0
MW-13
2.25
21.4
6.41
1892
NA**
0.22
-41.7
7.0
MW-14S
1.75
22.0
6.80
3305
8.8
0.06
-144
1.5
Notes:
C - Degrees celsius.
SU - Standard units.
uS/cm - Microsiemens per centimeter.
NTU - Nephelometric Turbidity Units.
mg/L - Milligrams per liter.
my - Millivolts.
PZ - Temporary stream peizometer.
MW - Permanent monitoring well.
NM - Not measured.
* Hach field test kit.
** turbidity probe malfunction.

� 4's SOL&
z
war
Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Project Name: C&D Landfill. Inc.
Site Location: Greenville, NC
Weather Conditions-
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from top of casing)
a, Total Well Depth: i
2 b, Casing Material:
r
d. Screen Length: e. Depth to Water:
g. Water Column: h. Well Volume:
Well/Pieze ID: 1
Date:
Project Number:
Start Time: 133 U
Finish Time:
ji
PVC c. Casing Diameter:
f. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b_ Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ well volumes) NA
c. Field Testing Equipment Used
Make YSI Model .Ca �_ Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
Water
�
�' r.
��/
���
�►
EnP,
—
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0,2 +/- 5%
f_ Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A - Explain below
<10 +/-0.2 +/-10
Yes No- N/A
OZ
❑ I� ❑
❑ ❑
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: P ricialV, D,.—.
Fe2+ = Q S mg/L
Sample ID
r,
Container Type
40 ml glass
40 ml glass
No. of Containers
3
3
Preservation
HCL
HCL
Analysis
App I VOCs by 8250
'.A ninxmia 0190 SIM
Time
1
�
App I Metals
ID
CST A-Q—
Additional Comments:
Signature: lw&.lt--� Date: -4 - Z

\`f- SO/
Well/Piezo ID: P-�—?--)
m�yHFM�O�
Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client; C&D Landfill, Inc.
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville NC
r�
Weather Conditions: _S: \A,.f
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: (me,sured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: _ T b. Casing Material:
t#
d. Screen Length: e. Depth to Water:
g. Water Column:
h. Well Volume:
Date:
Project Number:
Start Time: S
Finish Time:
ti.
PVC C. Casing Diameter:
f. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ well volumes)
c. Field Testing Equipment Used 7P P. f--,n5 k. nonft,1
Make YSI Model
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
Serial Number 3%Qb
Time
Volume
Removed
(gals)
Temp
(°C)
pH
(units)
Specific
Conductivity
( }
Turbidity
(NTUs}
DO
(mg/L)
ORP (mV)
Color
Pumping
Rate
(ml/min)
Water
Level
(ft)
3.�1
a.�3
���a,
+r r
s
���
I
.
C)
5''
0 `�
Q l-1
—i 0_
I.t
r l
0�
,
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- SV
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A - Explain below
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
<10 +/-0.2 +/-10
Yes No N/A
Er ❑ ❑
Fe2+ _ mg/L
C) Zcr
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260
40 ml glass
3
HCL
k-T5
1
App I Metals
Additional Comments:

5�.°f sot�,��
Well/Piezo ID: M— "?
Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&DLandfill Inc. Date: 9/PIO a 3
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc. Project Number:
Site Location: Greenville NC Start Time: �f7�
Weather Conditions: S 'f- Finish Time: i o
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: b. Casing Material: PVC c. Casing Diameter:
l
d. Screen Length: e. Depth to water: f. Pump Intake
Depth:
g. Water Column; h. Well Volume:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ well volumes) NA
c. Field Testing Equipment Used
Make YSI Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
f l $�
In screen
3 t.] ��()"
Specific
Conductivity
Turbiditv�•
�
�Kant
MW_M".1,
160m,
Mvm��M�10-
"IMIM.
0
KUM
Im
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- 5%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A- Explain below
<10 +/-0.2 +/-10
Yes No N/A
/A/`
El ❑ [
LYJ ❑ ❑
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: Peristaltic Pu
Fe2+ _ D , n mg/L
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
- 3
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260
40 ml glass
3
HCL
1-FPd83^
App I Metals
Additional Comments:
Signature-.
Date:

CON
Well/Piezo ID:
�POh.M£M�
Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenvill NC
Weather Conditions:
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: (meosured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: b. Casing Material:
I
d. Screen Length: k e. Depth to Water:
g. Water Column:
h. Well Volume:
Date: l a�
Project
Start Tirne:
Finish Time: 3 O
76
PVC c. Casing Diameter. k 2 ! �t
f. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ well volumes) NA
c. Field Testing Equipment Used (� Q
Make YSI Model f 0 1``J Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
Time
Volume
Removed
(gals)
Temp
("C)
pH
(units)
Specific
Conductivity
(µ5CI-)
Turbidity
(NTUs)
DO
ImR/L1
ORP (mV)
Color
Pumping
Rate
(ml/min)
Water
Level
(ft)
5
1
1
+lrj.
`s �r
-300
o.
3tK0
a.l
S�
S
oQ
t;,40
1L11
.?D,
0,56
- tip
v
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- S%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A-W Explain below
<10
+/-0.2 +/-10
Yes
No
N/A
❑
L_rJ
❑
❑
❑
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: Peristaltic Pump
Fe2+ = 3.6 mg/L
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260
1010
40 ml glass
3
HCL
M 5
1
-Hf4ei—
App I Metals
oh r
Additional Comments:
Signature:
Date:

Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: _ C&D Landfill, inc. .
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville, ANC
Weather Conditions. —ISO
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA:�(ymeasured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: b. Casing Material:
d. Screen Length: e. Depth to Water:
g, Water Column:
h. Well Volume:
Well/Piezo ID: r
PZZ - 'J
Date: g 1 x 1° 3
Project Number:
Start Time:
Finish Time: 3 4
PVC c_ Casing Diameter: t, �
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume( well volumes)
c. Field Testing Equipment Used
Make YSl Model C( O P I V S
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
f. Pump intake In screen
Depth:
Serial Number ,,
111,11411
Turbidity
E' Mj�f002
+
i
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0-2 40.2 +/- 5% <10 +/-0.2 +/-10 0 7(:r�
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail Yes No N/A Fe2+- mg/L
Has required volume been removed? ❑❑ El 9
l_ 1
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)2
Have parameters stabilized? � ❑ ❑
If No or N/A— Explain below
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: Peristaltic Pumo
Sample ID
Container Type
No- of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260
40 ml glass
3
HCL
1
`hFPd6M3--
App I Metals
0 �
r
Additional Comments:
Signature:
Date:

W(p
Well/Piezo ID:
Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&D Landfill Inc.
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville NC
Weather Conditions: b---) o �!- , C 0
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA:: (measured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: t b. Casing Material:
d. Screen Length: l e. Depth to Water:
g. Water column:
h. Well Volume:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume {@
c. Field Testing Equipment Used
Date: q b/ D _}
Project Number:
Start Time: (a 0 Q
Finish Time: VA 3 D
f�
PVC c. Casing Diameter: ly 1
f. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
well volumes) NA
Make YSI Model f CO P i `A � Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
-----------
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- 5%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A — Explain below
<10
+/-0.2 +/-10
Yes
No
N/A
:1
❑
0
��Zr
P
El
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: Peristaltic Pump
Fe2+ = l V mg/L
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260
40 ml glass
3
HCL
1 4-9ie�iCrl
1
NAIJQ3_
App I Metals
616^9,
er
Additional Comments:
Signature: Date:

804
N Well/Piezo ID: r
{
Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville NC
Weather Conditions: — (Ojs-
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: (.tmeosured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: 5 b- Casing Material-
l
d. Screen Length: e. Depth to Water:
g. Water Column:
h. Well Volume:
Date:
Project Number:
Start Time: a d
Finish Time: i is 0
PVC c. Casing Diameter:' 0+,
I. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flaw
b. Acceptance Criteria -
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ well volumes) NA
c. field Testing Equipment Used Make YSI Model Pry Serial Number 3S'P\b
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
Volume
Removed
Specific
Conductivity
Turbidity
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- 5%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A - Explain below
<10 +/-0.2 +/-70
Yes No N/A
❑H
- ! ❑
l ❑ ❑
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: Peristaltic Pump
Fe2+ = �0 `0 mg/L
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
-
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260
40 ml glass
3
HCL
` Q
1
Ape I Metals
Additional Comments:
Signature:
Date-

Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville, NC g
Weather Conditions: Sv AA
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth- h Casing Material
d. Screen Length:
g. Water Column:
e. Depth to Water:
h. Well Volume:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@
c. Field Testing Equipment Used
Make *5+ Model
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
Well/Piezo ID: K
Date: Iy
Project Number:
Start Time:
Finish Time: H Q
PVC r Casing Diamptpr- 2"
E �
5 f. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
well volumes) NA
Serial Number
Time
volume
Removed
(gals)
Temp
(°C)
pH
(units)
Specific
Conductivity
(
Turbidity
(NTUs)
DO
(mg/L}
ORP (mV)
color
Pumping
Rate
(ml/min)
Water
Level
(ft)
/�
[J
aC
3 .S l
a
+
5i TaL}
-
I
- i 3
.�
(1on
�0,
1 LA
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- 5% <10 +/-0.2 +/-10
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail Yes No N/A Fe2+ mg/L
Has required volume been removed? ❑
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)? ❑ ❑
Have parameters stabilized? ❑ ❑
If No or N/A— Explain below
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: Peristaltic Pumo
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
M
40 mi glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8250
40 ml glass
3
HCL
t, -WGKa4 SPA. Di.5
�[
1
-HN9�--
App I Metals �73 ,r
r10
�aIbA er
Additional Comments:
Signature: Date: �� 3

Client: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: _ Greenville. NC r
Weather Conditions: S"A^.N
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: b. Casing Material:
d. Screen Length:
g. Water Column:
e. Depth to Water:
h. Well Volume:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@
c. Field Testing Equipment Used
Make Yjr1-Model
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
Well/Piezo II]:
Groundwater Sample Collection Record /�
Date: 1 -3 o n
Project Number:
Start Time: j
Finish Time:
PVC c. Casing Diameter:
ti
f. Pump Intake
Depth:
pre,', © �As �� Y
well volumes)
Serial Number
2"
In screen
Time
Volume
Removed
(gals}
Temp
{°ci
pH
(units)
Specific
Conductivity
{ �S
Turbidity
(NTUs)
DO
(mg/L)
ORP (mV)
Color
Pumping
state
(m{/min
Water
evel
(ft)
Q o
_
.L'Q
- 5
©
t
a
93
o.
t 1Q
3.-7
i
Li
1
—tt"A
.30
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- 5%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A— Explain below
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
<10 +/-0.2 +/-10
Yes No N/A
❑ ❑
P ❑ ❑
Fe2->- _, , D mg/L
5ample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
-
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260
40 ml glass
3
HCL
t XN
1
App I Metals
Additional Comments:
Signature: Date:

Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville, NC
e
Weather Conditions:-*-ANNy� "` G
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: measured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: b. Casm; Material:
d. Screen Length: e- Depth to Water:
g. Water Column:
h. Well Volume:
Well/Piezo ID:
Date: 1-9�
Project Number:
Starr: Time: (�}
Finish Time:
PVC c. Casing Diameter: 7"
a f. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ well volumes) NA
c. Field Testing Equipment Used
Make -* - R,4,-160, Model Serial Number
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
Time
Volume
Removed
(gals}
Temp
(10
pH
(units)
Specific
Conductivity
{ }
Turbidity
(NTUs)
DO
(mg/L)
ORP (mV)
Color
Pumping
Rate
(ml/min)
Water
Level
(ft)
.�Q
3_
`.
b
I✓&Jr
C)o
oa
�3©
-J7.LA
U,LAS
a
_sf-,
-4i
`�©o
C)
q-s�S
a q
'tip
Q
;
_a
�D
3,
�.
3. �
nPA�_as
1
��
04
�T W6
n�
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/ S%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A - Explain below
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
<10 +/-0.2 +/-10
Yes No N/A
❑ ❑
Fe2+ _ 21 < Q mg/L
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260
S
40 ml glass
3
HCL
1
44N3--
Ap I Metals �r�
Additional Comments:
C
Signature: , Date: 07
�14

Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&D Landfill. Inc.
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville, NC
Weather Conditions:
Well/Pieza ID;
Date: 61-14-73
Project Number:
Start Time: I
Finish Time:
WELLIWATER LEVEL DATA' (meafured from top ofcasing)
a. Total Well Depth: _5 b. Casing Material: PVC c. Casing Diameter: 2"
d. Screen Length: S7 e. Depth to Water: �p f. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
g. Water Column:
h. Well Volume:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a_ Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume well volumes) NA
c. Field Testing Equipment Used t� (�
Make YSI Model [ CAN Serial Number 8
d_ Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
llemoved
(gals)
on!
1 Specific
Conductivity
i:
Turbidity
mo
Pumping
Rate
.
Water
Level
(ft)
EN"
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- 5%
QO
+/-0.2 +/-10
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Yes
No
N/A Fe2+ _ mg/L
Has required volume been removed?
❑
❑
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
❑
n
❑
Have parameters stabilized?
❑
❑
EJ
If No or N/A — Explain below
SAMPLE COLLECTION, Method: Peristaltic Pump
Sample I D
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
KW
40 mi glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260 L —
40 ml glass
3
HCL
jD1.55
1.
1
HNO3
App I Metals
S
Additional Comments:
Signature: Date:

&s"C Sot&
J f+'
Well%l?ieZo lD: �4 W — U
Groundwater Sample Collection Retort[
Client: _ C&D Landfill. Inc_
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville NC
Weather Conditions: - .r
n
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: (measured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: L 6 _7 (3 h. Casing Material
d. Screen Length:
g. Water Column:
e. Depth to Water:
h. Well Volume:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a_ Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@
c. Field Testing Equipment Used
Make -k51-? Model
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
Date: I� ki-i / 4!
Project Number_
Start Time:
Finish Time: (�
PVC c. Casing Diameter: 2"
f. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
well volumes) NA
Serial Number
Time
Volume
Removed
(gals}
Temp
{°C}
pli
{units)
Specific
Conductivity
( }
Turbidity
{Pf7Us}
DOPumping
{mg/L}
QRP{mV►
Color
Rate
(mi/min)
Water
Level
(ft)
04*( 0
`io
o.
a
�3L3
.14
M
i
zi ,n
(,.a�
`-1, i
p, L 5
—
t/
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- 5%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or NIA — Explain below
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method:
<10 +/-0.2 +/-10
Yes No N/A
❑ ❑ L�
❑ ❑
f ❑ ❑
Fe2+ _ )4 . () mg/L
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
M
40 mt glass
3
HCL
App I VDCs by 8260
40 ml glass
3
HCL
-
Additional Comments:
Signature:
Date:

WE
Well/Piezo ID:
{4-,k0
Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&D Landfill, Inc. Date:
Project Name: _ C&D Landfill, Inc. Project Number:
Site Location: _ Greenville. NC Start Time:
Weather Conditions: -- ) n Finish Time:
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA -
measured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: �C - �a b. Casing Material: PVC
" c. Casing Diameter: 2
d. Screen Length: e. Depth to Water: W , f. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
g. Water Column: h. Well Volume:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ well volumes) NA
c. Field Testing Equipment Used i i�
Make YSI Model y J D5S Serial Number �n5�
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
Time
Volume
Removed
(gals)
Temp
(^C}
pH
(units)
Specific
Conductivity
{ }
Turbidity
(NTUs)
DO
(mR/L)
ORP (mV)
Color
Pumping
Rate
(ml/min)
Water
Level
(ft)
C J
)
.�
3
6
— i 3�i 9'�
C1n ,• •
4 0
rwLA
4
a 1
1
S
a `�s -
�C
tI
t)
'-"
(
3,rA
0.C) D_
E <,
3��
LA
D
at.5
\-
', .7
33 Q
D.
w !3
3 f�
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- 5%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A - Explain below
<10
+/-0.2 +/-10
Yeess�/ No
N/A
ILJ ❑
❑
❑
❑
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: Peristaltic Pum
Fe2+ = 2 • Q mg/L
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260
Q
40 ml glass
3
HCL
` S
1
-hHdG3
App I Metals
Q�'4.er
l�r
Additional Comments: I \'rb- D/i �t �S AA-et3I�r'0� c�rrec � stilts�'.¢73
Ao e., u bi �,, sAe
Signature: Date:

Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&D Landfill Inc.
Project Name. C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville NC
Weather Conditions:
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: (rneclsvred from top of casing)
a. Total WL-11 Depth; b. Casing Material:
d. Screen Length: e. Depth to Water:
g. Water Column;
h. Well Volume;
Well[Piezo ID:
14 VJ-12
Date:
Project Number:
Start Time:
Finish Time:
PVC t_ Casing Diameter: 2"
f. Pump Intake in screen
Depth:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ well volumes) NA
c. Field Testing Equipment used
Make YSi Model �.�� Serial Number
d_ Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
®
• ,
. .Pumping
M 11ttS1��I
1
ljp
�
at
.
F21,110"&
11M
W MUM
WOM1COMB12
�
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- S%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A— Explain below
<10 +/-0.2 +/-10
Yes No N/A
F-1 ❑ 2'
L� ❑ ❑
❑ ❑
SAMPLE COLLECTION; Method: Peristaltic Pump
Fe2+ = 1 10 mg/L
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
•+ 1
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260 1
3®
40 ml glass
3
HCL
L
1
HNO3
App i Metals
Additional Comments:
Signature: s Date: -i - Z

Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Project Name: _ C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville, NC
Weather Conditions:
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: (meFsured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth:} b. Casing Material:
1
d. Screen Length: l e. Depth to Water:
g. Water Column:
h. Well Volume:
Well/Pieza ID:
KW - 13
Date:
Project Number:
Start Time;�LTD
Finish Time:
PVC c. Casing Diameter Z"
f. Pump Intake In screen
Depth:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b. Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (Qa well volumes) NA
c. Field Testing Equipment Used
Make YSI Model Serial Number6©Fl6
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation i e�
Turbidity
e. Stabilization Criteria: +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- 5%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbidity been reached (<10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A — Explain below
<10 +/-0.2 +/-10
Yee -sue/ No N/A
SAMPLE COLLECTION: Method: Peristaltic Pump
Fe2+ = —1 X mg/L
Sample ID
Container Type
No. of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App I VOCs by 8260
40 ml glass
3
HCL
{
44,51F5
tAL-
1
HNO3
App I Metals
wvt*
Additional Comments:
Signature: _ I Date_ —13 - L

Groundwater Sample Collection Record
Client. C&D Landfill Inc.
Project Name: C&D Landfill, Inc.
Site Location: Greenville, NC
Weather Conditions:
WELL/WATER LEVEL DATA: {mepssured from top of casing)
a. Total Well Depth: 1 b. Casing Material:
d. Screen Length: e. Depth to Water:
g. Water Column:
h. Well Volume:
Well/Pieza 0:
H W'- f 4-5
Date:
Project Number:
Start Time:
Finish Time:
PVC c. Casing Diameter:
WELL PURGING DATA:
a. Purge Method: Low -flow
b_ Acceptance Criteria:
Minimum Required Purge Volume (@ well volumes)
c. Field Testing Equipment Used
Make YSI Model . MO FLU-S
d. Field Testing Equipment Calibration Documentation
f. Pump Intake
Depth:
2„
In screen
Serial Number 389 8
•
®®
i
•
..Rate
Pumping
wimp
ffLIM
-----------
-----------
e. Stabilization Criteria. +/-0.2 +/-0.2 +/- 5%
f. Acceptance criteria pass/fail
Has required volume been removed?
Has required turbfdity been reached (C10)?
Have parameters stabilized?
If No or N/A— Explain below
<10 +/-0.2 +/-10
Yes No N/A
101/ ❑ L~!
OL ❑ ❑
IJ ❑ ❑
SAMPLECOLLEGTION: Method: PeristalticPumn
Fe2+ = l 4 T mg/L
Sample ID
Container Type
No_ of Containers
Preservation
Analysis
Time
40 ml glass
3
HCL
App 1 VOCs by 8260
40 ml glass
3
HCL
�j
µ�
1
HNO3
App I Metals
SVLfVV-14-
6
Additional Comments:
Signature:7qu Date: —IT— f3

Table B
Summary of ASD Soil Analytical Results - September 2023
C&D Landfill, Inc
Greenville, North Carolina
Analyte
Residential
Health Based
PSRGs
Protection of
Groundwater
PSRGs
Units
CSS-1
CSS-2
CSS-3
CSS-4
USS-1
USS-1-DUP
USS-2
USS-3
USS-4
DSS-1
DSS-2
DSS-3
DSS-4
9/5/2023
9/5/2023
9/5/2023
9/6/2023
9/6/2023
9/6/2023
9/6/2023
9/6/2023
9/6/2023
9/6/2023
9/6/2023
9/6/2023
9/6/2023
Metals by EPA Method 6020B
Antimony
6,300
900
ug/kg
<311
<266
<264
<279
<270
<270
<302
<277
<309
<1120
<267
<288
<276
Arsenic
680
5,800
ug/kg
386
297
<264
3,150
<270
330
643
<277
469
1,010
<267
859
324
Barium
3,100,000
580,000
ug/kg
7,300
3,140
3,600
58,100
9,110
11,000
17,900
13,800
15,500
36,100
6,990
29,700
13,300
Beryllium
31,000
63,000
ug/kg
<311
<266
<264
855
<270
<270
<302
<277
<309
<279
<267
326
<276
Cadmium
1,400
3,000
ug/kg
<311
<266
<264
<279
<270
<270
<302
<277
<309
<279
<267
<288
<276
Chromium*
23,000,000
360,000,000
ug/kg
4,580
1,820
2,620
36,900
3,620
4,330
14,500
3,010
5,740
8,630
2,220
13,700
3,730
Cobalt
4,700
900
ug/kg
661
<265
436
4,340
277
331
1,230
343
422
1,780
344
1,610
571
Copper
630,000
700,000
ug/kg
1,490
492
653
19,400
989
1,370
1,680
757
1,030
3,450
576
3,330
1,040
Iron
11,000,000
150,000
ug/kg
3,310,000
2,030,000
1,290,000
7,150,000
1,560,000
2,090,000
11,000,000
1,120,000
1,610,000
7,390,000
864,000
8,430,000
2,330,000
Lead
NS
270,000
ug/kg
2,530
1,080
1,220
11,600
2,980
3,760
8,810
4,120
6,340
7,240
2,450
7,890
4,000
Manganese
380,000
65,000
ug/kg
5,580
2,780
3,960
267,000
6,510
7,590
14,600
9,830
5,730
40,200
6,430
32,600
32,800
Nickel
310,000
130,000
ug/kg
1,790
610
929
9,680
935
1,030
3,110
1,280
1,620
4,400
986
4,780
1,450
Selenium
78,000
2,100
ug/kg
<311
<265
<264
808
<270
<270
363
<277
420
535
<267
498
372
Silver
78,000
3,400
ug/kg
<311
<266
<264
<279
<270
<270
<302
<277
<309
<279
<267
<288
<276
Thallium
160
2,800
ug/kg
<311
<266
<264
<279
<270
<270
<302
<277
<309
<279
<267
<288
<276
Vanadium
78,000
140,000
ug/kg
6,750
2,720
<1320
28,600
5,030
6,900
32,100
4,350
8,080
23,000
2,550
27,000
5,250
Zinc
4,700,000
1,200,000
ug/kg
3,810
<2660
3,060
52,000
<2700
3,300
7,100
3,510
4,340
13,500
<2670
11,500
4,340
General Chemistry
Total Organic Carbon
NS
NS
%
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
1.8
0.18
0.20
0.37
0.24
2.2
0.13
<0.10
0.28
<0.10
Notes:
PSRGs - NCDEQ Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals, February 2024.
ug/Kg - micrograms per kilogram or parts per billion.
NS - Not specified.
Bold - Detected constituent.
< # - Not detected at or above the indicated Method Quantitation Limit (MQL) for metals and Reporting Limit (RL) for TOC.
* Chromium(III), Insoluble Salts
Blue highlighted cell - concentration exceeds the Residential Health Based PSRG.
Salmon highlighted cell - concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.
1of1

Table C
Summary of ASD Groundwater Analytical Results - September 2023
C&D Landfill, Inc. Construction and Demolition Debris Landfills
Greenville, North Carolina
Analyte
NC 2L Groundwater
Standard or
IMAC
Units
MW-2S
M BPS
MW-3S
MW-3A
MW-5
MW-6
MW-8
MW-12S
MW-13
MW-14S
9/14/2023
9/14/2023
9/14/2023
9/13/2023
9/14/2023
9/14/2023
9/15/2023
9/14/2023
9/13/2023
9/15/2023
VOCs by EPA Method 8260D
Acetone
6000
ug/L
24
24
23
10
5
<5
17
21
6
14
Benzene
1
ug/L
<0.5
<0.5
1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
1
1
1
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
70
ug/L
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
1
<0.5
1,4-Dioxane
3
ug/L
<150
163
<150
<150
<
Tetrahydrofuran
2000
ug/L
23
21
35
22
<10
<10
16
42
12
37
Vinyl Chloride
0.03
ug/L
1-u.0
<0.5
0.7
2
1
Metals by EPA Methods 200.7 and 200.8
Antimony
1
ug/L
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
0.34 J
Arsenic
10
ug/L
18
20
40
35
9
9
28
53
10
19
Barium
700
ug/L
451
467
1,332
567
187
512
64
507
277
788
Beryllium
4
ug/L
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
Cadmium
2
ug/L
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
Calcium
NS
ug/L
308,250
334,400
259,050
177,545
153,440
214,520
360,740
205,570
263,660
370,090
Chromium
10
ug/L
11
12
25
16
4.6 J
6.4
22
50
5.4
35
Cobalt
1
ug/L
3.2
3.4
3.5
5.1
1.7
2.2
2.2
3.9
3.4
2.9
Copper
1000
ug/L
0.72 J
0.71 J
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
0.62 J
<0.26
<0.26
0.44 J
<0.26
Iron
300
ug/L
12,099
12,149
23,875
22,090
12,425
11,114
39,778
908
25,929
1,805
Lead
15
ug/L
0.20 J
0.20 J
<0.09
<0.09
<0.09
0.12 J
<0.09
<0.09
0.46 J
0.19 J
Manganese
50
ug/L
1,132
1,202
1,993
1,335
427
904
1,205
586
506
915
Nickel
100
ug/L
2.5J
2.7J
3.1 J
3.4J
1.6J
1.9 J
1.6J
3.0J
5.1 J
3.0J
Selenium
20
ug/L
1.01
1.01
0.901
1.01
0.48J
0.46J
0.54J
2.5J
2.0J
1.91
Silver
20
ug/L
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
Thallium
2
ug/L
0.34 J
<0.13
<0.13
0.15 J
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
Vanadium
7
ug/L
7
8
10
7
1
12
4
31
4
13
Zinc
1000
ug/L
<0.34
<0.34
0.48 J
0.52 J
0.91 J
0.78 J
0.68 J
0.48 J
17
0.71 J
MNA Parameters
Nitrate+Nitrite as N
10,000
ug/L
1,890
1,880
<40
180
<40
0.41
110
<40
<40
260
Chloride
250,000
ug/L
138,000
140,000
222,000
135,000
64,000
58,000
124,000
182,000
78,000
220,000
Sulfate
250,000
ug/L
343,000
366,000
57,600
159,000
188,000
84,500
268,000
<5000
236,000
<5000
Sulfide
NS
ug/L
<4000
<4000
<4000
<4000
<4000
<4000
<4000
<4000
<4000
5,600
Alkalinity as CaCO3
NS
ug/L
980,000
990,000
1,660,000
1,180,000
520,000
790,000
560,000
1,460,000
730,000
1,470,000
Total Dissolved Solids
500,000
ug/L
1,800,000
1,670,000
2,000,000
1,400,000
810,000
930,000
1,700,000
1,700,000
1,100,000
1,900,000
Total Organic Carbon
NS
ug/L
117,600
109,200
184,700
131,600
54,480
63,240
121,000
188,600
82,110
187,100
Carbon Dioxide
NS
ug/L
212,000 H
220,000 H
108,000 H
296,000 H
72,000 H
188,000 H
280,000 H
312,000 H
340,000 H
298,000 H
Methane
NS
ug/L
700
753
1,480
1,830
268
569
1,410
2,600
863
2,140
Ethane
NS
ug/L
<0.32
<0.32
<0.32
<0.32
<0.32
<0.32
0.53
<0.32
<0.32
<0.32
Ethene
NS
I ug/L
1 1.2
1 <0.43
1 1.9
1 0.74
1 <0.43
1 <0.43
1 1.7
1 2.1
1 0.76
1 3.1
Notes:
NC 2L Groundwater Standard or IMAC - 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Quality Standards (April 2022); NC Interim Maximum Allowable Concentrations (IMACs) (January 2024).
NS - Not specified.
Bold - Detected constituent.
< # - Concentration does not exceed the indicated laboratory Method Detection Limit (MDL).
J - Estimated value > or = the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and < the Method Reporting Limit (MRL).
H - Sample analyzed past holding time.
Green highlighted cell indicates value is greater than the NC 2L Groundwater Standard or IMAC.
Purple font - MDL exceeds the 2L Standard.
1of1

Table D
Summary of ASD GSI Piezometer Analytical Results - September
2023 C&D Landfill, Inc. Construction and Demolition Debris
Landfills Greenville, North Carolina
Analyte
NC 2L
Groundwater
Standard or
IMAC
Units
PZ-1
PZ-2
PZ-3
PZ-3 DUP
PZ-4
PZ-5
PZ-8
PZ-9A
PZ-10
PZ-11
9/19/2023
9/19/2023
9/20/2023
9/20/2023
9/21/2023
9/21/2023
9/28/2023
9/29/2023
9/29/2023
9/29/2023
VOCs by EPA Method 8260D
Acetone
6000
ug/L
<5
13
<5
<5
6
<5
21.9 J
<9.06
12.6
24.3
Benzene
1
ug/L
<0.5
1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.24
0.71
<0.24
1.59
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.4
ug/L
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.03 J
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
70
ug/L
<0.5
1
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.6
ug/L
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
0.04 J
1,4-Dioxane
3
ug/L
<150
<150
<150
<150
<150
<150
93.4
63.3
14.6
138
Tetrahydrofuran
2000
ug/L
<10
54
<10
<10
19
<10
37
23.8
20.5
70
Toluene
600
ug/L
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.23
<0.23
<0.23
0.36 J
Vinyl Chloride
0.03
ug/L
<0.5
3
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
Xylenes (Total)
500
ug/L
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.68
<0.68
<0.68
0.79 J
Metals by EPA Methods 200.7 and 200.8
Antimony
1
ug/L
<0.30
0.81 J
0.56 J
0.35 J
<0.30
<0.30
0.39 J
0.41 J
0.38 J
0.38 J
Arsenic
10
ug/L
0.43 J
9
0.25 J
0.38 J
17
0.39 J
21
3.6 J
13
38
Barium
700
ug/L
58
553
201
202
180
124
849
166
618
717
Beryllium
4
ug/L
0.20 J
0.19 J
0.15 J
0.16 J
<0.10
0.15 J
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
0.21 J
Cadmium
2
ug/L
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
Calcium
NS
ug/L
3,190
480,420
11,200
11,255
399,150
11,627
284,900
306,490
303,790
270,030
Chromium
10
ug/L
2.4 J
30
0.44 J
0.54 J
17
1.9 J
12
9.6
10
64
Cobalt
1
ug/L
0.39 J
3.2
1.0
0.96 J
2.5
0.26 J
6.7
3.2
2.2
5.9
Copper
1000
ug/L
3 J
3 J
6 J
5 J
5 J
3 J
0.79 J
6 J
0.29 J
3 J
Iron
300
ug/L
884
32,819
106
119
18,117
470
25,105
230
16,933
14,662
Lead
15
ug/L
2.1 J
<0.09
0.43 J
0.38 J
0.65 J
0.51 J
0.12 J
<0.09
0.20 J
1.3 J
Manganese
50
ug/L
18
626
83
84
2,386
81
3,306
119
354
2,702
Nickel
100
ug/L
1.6J
3.3J
1.4J
1.4J
4.0J
0.61 J
3.9J
2.5J
1.6J
21.3
Selenium
20
ug/L
0.44 J
2.5 J
<0.43
<0.43
0.86 J
<0.43
1.0 J
1.7 J
1.2 J
2.0 J
Silver
20
ug/L
0.20 J
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
Thallium
2
ug/L
0.54 J
<0.13
<0.13
0.38 J
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
Vanadium
7
ug/L
6
5
3
3
5
7
6
0.58 J
1
38
Zinc
1000
ug/L
8.6J
1.5J
14
13
12
3.6J
9.7J
8.81
7.3J
12
MNA Parameters
Nitrate+Nitrite as N
10,000
ug/L
60
<40
6,900
6,000
<40
3,040
<40
<40
<40
<40
Chloride
250,000
ug/L
3,000
196,000
16,000
17,000
60,000
15,000
162,000
165,000
72,000
245,000
Sulfate
250,000
ug/L
15,800
156,000
10,300
9,800
361,000
14,000
185,000
133,000
44,900
5,900
Sulfide
NS
ug/L
<2000
<2000
<2000
2,100
<100
<100
141 J
145 J
<100
102 J
Alkalinity as CaCO3
NS
ug/L
3,000
1,330,000
8,000
1,180,000
8,000
7,000
1,470,000
710,000
950,000
1,880,000
Total Dissolved Solids
500,000
ug/L
64,000
1,900,000
120,000
110,000
1,800,000
92,000
1,700,000
1,700,000
1,500,000
2,300,000
Total Organic Carbon
NS
ug/L
3,330
165,000
<129
<129
119,000
<129
137,600
106,200
61,170
278,400
Carbon Dioxide
NS
ug/L
84,000 H
448,000 H
36,000 H
28,000 H
236,000 H
32,000 H
292,000 H
286,000 H
280,000 H
408,000 H
Methane
NS
ug/L
23.7
959
83.5
84.6
229
34.6
1,050
4,890
102
1,270
Ethane
NS
ug/L
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
0.39 J
0.77 J
<0.32
<0.32
Ethene
NS
I ug/L
I <0.16
0.24
<0.16
<0.16
<0.16
<0.16
0.53 J
3.5
<0.43
1.1
Notes:
NC 2L Groundwater Standard or IMAC - 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Quality Standards (April 2022); NC Interim Maximum Allowable Concentrations (IMACs) (January 2024).
NS - Not specified.
Bold - Detected constituent.
< # - Concentration does not exceed the indicated laboratory Method Detection Limit (MDL).
J - Estimated value > or = the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and < the Method Reporting Limit (MRL).
H - Sample analyzed past holding time.
Green highlighted cell indicates the value is greater than the NC 2L Groundwater Standard or IMAC.
1of1

Table E
Summary of ASD GSI Surface Water Analytical Results - September
2023 C&D Landfill, Inc. Construction and Demolition Debris Landfills
Greenville, North Carolina
Analyte
NC 213 Metals
Standards
Acute Toxicity
Class C
NC 213 Metals
Standards
Chronic
Toxicity
NC 213 Surface
Water
Standards
Class C
Units
SW-GS-1
SW-GS-2
SW-GS-3
SW-GS-4
SW-GS-5
SW-GS6
SW-GS-7
SW-GS-8
SW-GS-8
DUP
SW-GS-9
SW-GS-10
9/15/2023
9/15/2023
9/18/2023
9/18/2023
9/18/2023
9/18/2023
9/19/2023
9/18/2023
9/18/2023
9/18/2023
9/19/2023
VOCs by EPA Method 8260D
Acetone
NS
NS
2000a
ug/L
<5
<5
9
17
6
5
55
<5
<5
<5
12
1,4-Dioxane
NS
NS
80a
ug/L
<150
<150
<150
<150
<150
<150
<150
Metals by EPA Methods 200.7 and 200.8
Antimony
NS
NS
640b
ug/L
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
<0.30
Arsenic
340
150
NS
ug/L
1.1 J
4.4 J
5.6
20
6.8
6.6
11
3.5 J
4.0 J
1.2 J
4.2 J
Barium
NS
NS
21'000a
ug/L
108
227
193
454
232
253
224
94.5
109
121
344
Beryllium
65
6.5
NS
ug/L
<0.10
<0.10
0.5 J
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
Cadmium
0.75
0.25
NS
ug/L
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
Calcium
NS
NS
NS
ug/L
27,319
100,985
98,019
235,690
119,900
104,150
238,160
102,290
118,180
51,332
210,070
Chromium
180
24
NS
ug/L
0.66 J
6.8
8.7
26
12
11
21
5.8
8.2
2.2 J
7.9
Cobalt
16a
1.6a
NS
ug/L
0.24 J
1.1
1.4
2.5
1.6
3.2
2.1
0.82 J
1.3
0.66 J
2.6
Copper
3.6
2.7
NS
ug/L
2 J
<0.26
<0.26
1 J
<0.26
2 J
2 J
2 J
3 J
<0.26
0.54 J
Iron
NS
NS
1000b
ug/L
877
4,101
2,891
8,823
3,337
9,004
9,976
7,256
11,294
1,857
29,709
Lead
14
0.54
NS
ug/L
0.22 J
0.41 J
<0.09
1.5 J
0.14 J
3.8 J
2.1 J
3.1 J
4.6 J
0.36 J
0.41 J
Manganese
NS
NS
100b
ug/L
93
310
325
646
410
371
401
106
149
168
771
Nickel
140
16
NS
ug/L
0.30J
0.991
1.2J
2.7J
1.6J
2.1 J
2.0J
2.0J
3.0J
0.65J
1.4J
Selenium
NS
NS
5
ug/L
<0.43
0.61 J
0.70 J
11
0.62 J
0.65 J
1.3 J
<0.43
<0.43
<0.43
0.50 J
Silver
0.30
0.06
NE
ug/L
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
<0.14
Thallium
NS
NS
2a
ug/L
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
0.30 J
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
Vanadium
NS
NS
NS
ug/L
0.64 J
2
2
4
2
6
3
9
13.0
0.56 J
0.69 J
Zinc
36
36
NS
ug/L
5.2 J
7.7 J
1.8 J
9.3 J
1.9 J
25
18
12
19
1.3 J
2.6 J
Notes:
NC 2B Surface Water Standards - 15A NCAC 02B Surface Water Quality Standards (September 2022) - currently being revised.
- NC In -stream Target Values.
b - EPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria.
NS - Not specified.
Bold - Detected constituent.
< # - Concentration does not exceed the indicated laboratory Method Detection Limit (MDL).
J - Estimated value > or = the Method Detection Limit (MDL) and < the Method Reporting Limit (MRL).
Green highlighted cell indicates the value is greater than the NC 2B Standard for Class C surface water.
Salmon highlighted cell indicates the value is greater than the NC 2B Standard for Chronic Toxicity.
Purple font - MDL exceeds the 2B Standard.
1of1

Figure 1
Summary of GSI locations 1 and 2
• Groundwater discharge conditions prevail at GSI locations.
• Table shows co -located GSI groundwater (GW) and surface
water (SW) Metals of Interest (MOI) data compared to
local well and surface water data. The max value for each
MOI in each group is bolded.
• Time -history data at SW-4 are consistent with that collected
at SW-GS-1 and SW-GS-2.
• All data are unfiltered totals. Standards shown are for the
dissolved phase.
• Data support that the MOTs are attenuated across the GW-
SW interface.
Location
MOT [ug/L]
As
total Cr
Co
v
Fe
Mn
well
MW-19
0.26
0.22
0.75
0.81
4,187
118
well
MW-16
13
17
0.76
15
36,106
477
GSI GW
PZ-1
0.43
2.4
0.39
6
884
GSI SW
SW-GS-1
1.1
OM0.24
0.64
877LL
SW
SW-4
130.81
0.28
1
597
well
MW-15
2
3.4
1.4
3
2,494
215
well
MW-14S
19
35
2.9
13
1,805
915
well
MW-13
10
5.4
3.4
4
25,929
506
GSI GW
PZ-2
9
30
3.2
5
32,819
626
GSI SW
SW-GS-2
4.4
6.8
1.1
2
4,101
310
In stream aquatic life_ fresh surface water_ Class C [u i'L]
mol
NC 2B or Target Value
toxicity
EPA NRYM
Acute
Chronic
As
340
150
N5
Cr III
180
24
N5
Cr VI
16
11
N5
Ca
16
1.6
N5
Fe
INS
N5
1000
Mn
IN
N5
N5
V
IN
N5
N5

Figure 2
Summary of GSI locations 3, 4 and 5
• Groundwater discharge conditions prevail at GSI locations.
• Table shows co -located GSI groundwater (GW) and surface
water (SW) Metals of Interest (MOI) data compared to
local well and surface water data. The max value for each
MOI in each group is bolded.
• All data are unfiltered totals. Standards shown are for the
dissolved phase.
• Data support that the MOls are attenuated across the GW-
SW interface.
Location
MOI [ug/L]
As
total Cr
Cc
v
Fe
Mn
well
MW-13
10
5.4
3.4
4
25,929
506
well
MW-12S
53
50
3.9
31
908
586
GSI GW
PZ-3
0.25
0.44
1
3
106
83 di
GSI SW
SW-GS-3
5.6
8.7
1.4
2
2,891
325
SW
SW-3
4.9
1 4.8
1 1.6
1 2
1 1,763
82
well
MW-12S
53
50
3.9
31
908
586
well
MW-8
28
22
2.2
4
39,778
1205
well
GSI GW
MW-tt
PZ-4
5.9
3.8
0.79
t
13,039
231
17
17
2.5
5
18,117
2,386
GSI SW
SW-GS-4
20
26
2.5
4
8,823
646
SW
SW-3
4.9
4.8
1.6
2
1,763
82
well
MW-12S
53
50
3.9
31
908
586
well
MW-3A
35
16
5.1
7
22,090
1,335
well
MW-3S
40
25
3.5
10
7
23,875
1,993
GSI GW
PZ-5
0.39
1.9
0.26
470
81
GSI SW
SW-GS-5
6.8
12
1.6
2
3,337
410
SW
SW-3
4.9
4.8
1.6
2
1,763
82

Figure 3
Summary of GSI Locations 6, 8 and 11
In stream aquatic life. fresh surface water. Class C [ue L]
NC 2B or Target Value
Groundwater discharge conditions prevail at GSI locations
and 11. Location 6 did not produce groundwater in a tim(
manner, discharge assumed.
Table shows co -located GSI groundwater (GW) and surface
water (SW) metals of interest (MOI) data compared to local
well and surface water data. The max value for each MOI in
each group is bolded.
All data are unfiltered totals. Standards shown are for tl
dissolved phase.
Data support that the MOls are attenuated across the GW-Sb
interface.
Location
MOI [ug/L]
As
total Cr
Co
v
Fe
Mn
well
MW-3A
35
16
5.1
7
22,090
1,335
well
MW-3S
40
25
3.5
10
23,875
1,993
well
MW-5
9
4.6
1.7
1
12,425
427
GSI GW
PZ-6
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
GSI SW
SW-GS-6
1 6.6
11
3.2
6
9,004
371
well
well
GSI GW
MW-25
MW-5
PZ-11
18
9
38
11
4.6
64
3.2
1.7
5.9
7
1
38
12,099
12,425
14,662
1,132
427
2,702
GSI SW
SW-GS-11
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
NM
well
MW-2S
1 18
11
3.2
7
12,099
1,132
GSI GW
PZ-8
21
12
6.7
6
25105
3,306
GSI SW
SW-GS-8
3.5
5.8
1 0.82
9
7,256
106

Figure 4
Summary of GSI locations 7, 10 and 9A
In stream aquatic life. fresh surface water. Class C [- LI
MOI
NC 28 or Target Value
toxicity
EPA NRWQC
Acute
I Chronic
• Groundwater discharge conditions prevail at GSI locations 10
and 9A. Location 7 did not produce groundwater in a timely
manner, discharge assumed.
• Table shows co -located GSI groundwater (GW) and surface
water (SW) metals of interest (MOI) data compared to local
well and surface water data. The max value for each MOI in
each group is bolded.
• All data are unfiltered totals. Standards shown are for the
dissolved phase.
• Data support that the MOTs are attenuated across the GW-SW
interface.
MOI [ug/L]
Location
As
total Cr
Co
V
I
Mn
well
MW-8
28
22
2.2
4
39,778
1,205
well
MW-11
5.9
3.8
NM
0.79
1
NM
13,039
NM
231
NM
_
GSI GW
PZ-7
NM
NM
GSI SW
SW-GS-71
11
21
2.1
3
9,976
401
well
MW-4
2.6
2
0.05
3
1,732
108
well
MW-7
9
10
12
1
1
22,081
804
GSI GW
PZ-10
13
10
2.2
16,933
354
GSI SW
SW-GS-10
4.2
79
2.6
0.69
29,709
771
SW
SW-1
2.3
3.6
0.36
1.4
NM
NM
well
GSI GW
MW-6
PZ-9A
9
3.6
6.4
1 9.6
2.2
12
0.58
11,114
904
1 3.2
230
119
GSI SW
SW-GS-9
1.2
0.48
2.2
0.66
0.56
1 0.38
1,857
NM
168
NM
SW
SW-2
0.71
1 0.24

Figure 5
Summary of Time -Trends at Facility Compliance Surface Water Locations from 2017 to 2023.
1D
/I
4, PARAMETER _ �T
8
SW -4
35 Arsenic
6
•
34 25 z Chromium, total
4
20 _ —0--Cobalt
r 3
2
15 a
10 .�. �Vanadum
1
5 --m—Turbidrty (Field)
0
0
lipBCD,
y
$ roh y'tk Stiff} 1ti
12
10
-- g
SW-3
�T
7° PARAMETERCI
�A Beni
500 �
a Chromium, total
6
ti
30
¢
20 Vanadium
2
to "
�Turbidrty {Field)
0
0
M1'L1�1 g, 'OP •9 ��pya .D [y�ry ti �� ,�. �oy3
-11�
��tiny
Hjl 1 oy � 6yry 1 6ti 1V
,y�1
1
16
SW —2
506 PARAMET8i ,T
450
1 2
12
400 �Arseric
350 F
1
300 z Chromium, total
0.8
4 0.5
250 Cobalt
200
1 0.4
150 100 2 �Varnadum
02
50 --e--Turbdrty (Field)
0
0
�l
y'v��y�yti�l~pF eyv�'ya��ti�ay'v�ti�ti��at'"
80
SW —1
403500 PARAMETER
70
300 - —a—Arsenic
60
50
250 z _.@_Chromiurr4 total
O 40
200
t - —Cobalt
150
20
100 Vanadium
10
50Tuhidiry {Field]
0
0
4'Ll��bl� 4'Sl� ,y'tary4 .4'Sl �S` 81�o0
• SW-1 and SW-4 are considered background.
• Missing metals of interest (MOI) data point
means the sampling location was dry
• All data are unfiltered totals. Standards shown are
for the dissolved phase.
• Concentrations are affected by turbidity
In stream a uatic life. fresh surface water. Class C [ug L]
MCI
NC 2B or Target Value
toxicity
Acute Chronic
EPA NRWQC
As
340
150
NS
Cr III
180
24
NS
Cr VI
16
11
NS
co
16
1.6
NS
Fe
NS
NS
1000
Mn
NS
NS
NS
V
NS
NS
NS