AS-3740_28869_CA_MRP_20230810

Via Email
August 10, 2023
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Asheville Regional Office
2090 US Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Attention: Ms. Maura Clark

Re: Monitoring Report Former Dietz Trucking Terminal Hickory, North Carolina NC DEQ Incident No. 28869
H&H Job No. ROS-001
Dear Maura: On behalf of Dietz Holding, LLC, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is submitting the attached
Monitoring Report for the above-referenced site. If you have any questions or need further
information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Stephen R. Libbey, PG Project Manager

Monitoring Report
Former Dietz Trucking Terminal

8814 Dietz Avenue
Hickory, North Carolina
NC DEQ Incident No. 28869

H&H Job No. ROS-001 August 10, 2023

i
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
Title Page
Site Location: 8814 Dietz Avenue Hickory, NC 28637
Site Owner:
Dietz Holding, LLC c/o Mr. Greg Skoog P.O. Box 1790 Hildebran, NC 28637
UST Owner: Rose Dietz (deceased) 746 14th Avenue NW Hickory, NC 28601 Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC 2923 S. Tryon Street, Ste 100 Charlotte, NC 28203 [phone] General Site Information: Facility ID Number: 0-004348 NC DEQ Incident Number: 28869 Site Priority Ranking: High
Land Use Category: Industrial Latitude: 35.70478N Longitude: -81.43421W Release Discovery Date: July 20, 2010 Estimated Quantity of Release: Unknown Cause/Source of Release: Unknown/UST System
Size and content of UST system: 10,000-gallon diesel Laboratory: Waypoint Analytical, LLC, NC Certification No. 402

ii
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
Monitoring Report Former Dietz Trucking Terminal
Hickory, North Carolina H&H Job No. ROS-001
Table of Contents
Section Page No. 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................1
2.0 Site History and Source Characterization ............................................................................3
3.0 Summary of Potential Receptor Information.......................................................................6
3.1 Water Supply Wells ...............................................................................................................6
3.2 Surface Water ........................................................................................................................6
4.0 Groundwater Monitoring .......................................................................................................7
4.1 Water Levels ..........................................................................................................................7
4.2 Monitoring Well Analytical Data ..........................................................................................7
5.0 Groundwater Modeling Evaluation ......................................................................................8
5.1 Slug Testing ...........................................................................................................................8
5.2 Groundwater Fate and Transport Modeling ..........................................................................8
5.3 Naphthalene Plume Stability and Degradation Rate Constant Evaluation ..........................10
6.0 Conclusions, Recommendations, and Certification ...........................................................12

List of Tables

Table 1 Receptor Information
Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Level Data
Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Sampling Results
Table 4 Summary of Slug Test Parameters
Table 5 BIOSCREEN Model Calibration and Results

iii
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
List of Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Water Supply Well Survey and Adjacent Property Owners Map
Figure 4 Monitoring Well Locations and Groundwater Elevations Map

List of Appendices

Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Data
Appendix B Slug Test Data
Appendix C Groundwater Model Output Sheets
Appendix D GSI Mann-Kendall Spreadsheet and Linear Regression Graph

1
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
Monitoring Report Former Dietz Trucking Terminal
Hickory, North Carolina H&H Job No. ROS-001
1.0 Executive Summary

On behalf of Dietz Holding, LLC, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) has completed this Monitoring
Report for the former Dietz trucking terminal located at 8814 Dietz Avenue in Hickory, Burke
County, North Carolina. The site is approximately 17.25 acres in area and contains an
approximate 29,400 square ft office and warehouse building and an approximate 10,900 square ft
former service garage building. Currently, the site is used as a trucking terminal and is located in
a mixed commercial, industrial and residential area of Hickory, North Carolina.

Monitoring wells TMW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 were sampled on June March 22, 2023. In
addition, slug testing was conducted in monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3. Laboratory
analytical results indicate that naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene were
detected above the NC 15A NCAC 02L.0202 Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) in TMW-1.
No compound concentrations exceeded their DEQ-defined GCLs in TMW-1. Additionally, no
compound concentrations were detected above the groundwater standards in the remaining
monitoring wells.

Conservative groundwater fate and transport modeling indicates naphthalene concentrations
equal to or above the 2L Standard will extend to a maximum distance of approximately 49 ft
from the source area, and naphthalene concentrations above the laboratory detection limits will
extend to a maximum distance of approximately 81 ft from the source area. Additionally, a GSI
Mann-Kendall statistical analysis indicates naphthalene concentrations in the source area are
currently stable, and the estimated time required to reach the naphthalene 2L Standard in source
area monitoring well TMW-1 is approximately 51.5 years (from the year 2017) based on a linear
regression analysis.

2
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
Based on the result of the groundwater sampling, groundwater fate and transport modeling, and
plume stability evaluation, naphthalene should not be detected above the laboratory detection
limit or its 2L Standard at the unnamed tributary of Henry Fork River located approximately 300
ft downgradient of the source area, and the threat of impacts to on-site and off-site water supply
wells appears to be low. As a result, H&H recommends that the risk ranking for the site be
reduced to low risk and that DEQ issue no further action (NFA) for the UST release.

3
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
2.0 Site History and Source Characterization

On behalf of Dietz Holding, LLC, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) has completed this Monitoring
Report for the former Dietz trucking terminal located at 8814 Dietz Avenue in Hickory, Burke
County, North Carolina. The site is approximately 17.25 acres in area and contains an
approximate 29,400 square ft office and warehouse building and an approximate 10,900 square ft
former service garage building. Currently, the site is used as a trucking terminal and is located in
a mixed commercial, industrial and residential area of Hickory, North Carolina. A site location
map is presented as Figure 1, and a site layout is depicted on Figure 2.

Underground storage tank (UST) closure activities were conducted at the site for a 10,000-gallon
diesel UST on July 20 and 21, 2010. During UST closure, approximately 112 tons of impacted
soils were excavated from around the UST and transported off-site for proper disposal. The UST
excavation was limited in extent on its western sidewall due to the existence of the former
service garage building.

The results of analyses of the post-excavation soil samples indicated that one sample (labeled
West SW) in the excavation western sidewall contained compound concentrations above soil-to-
groundwater Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentrations (MSCCs). No post-excavation soil
sample concentrations exceeded residential or commercial/industrial MSCCs.

Based on soil remaining in the excavation western sidewall above the lowest MSCCs, H&H
recommended that a Phase I Limited Site Assessment (LSA) be completed for the site in
accordance with North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) guidance.
Additionally, due to the close proximity of the on-site water supply well, H&H also
recommended sampling the well during the Phase I LSA. In a Notice of Regulatory
Requirements (NORR) letter dated August 26, 2010, DEQ indicated that a Phase I LSA should
be completed for the site.

On October 27, 2010, H&H oversaw the advancement of LSA monitoring well TMW-1 adjacent
to former soil sample West SW that contained the highest compound concentrations during the

4
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
initial abatement activities. Soil samples were not collected from the TMW-1 boring because the
initial abatement excavation extended to the water table and excavation sidewall samples for
risk-based analysis were collected as part of the initial abatement. In addition, on-site water
supply well WSW-1 also was sampled.

Because the groundwater analytical results for TMW-1 indicated compound concentrations
greater than 10 times the groundwater standards, and because water supply wells were identified
within 1,000 ft, H&H conducted additional assessment activities to meet the requirements of a
Phase II LSA. On December 20, 2010, H&H oversaw the installation of monitoring wells MW-2
and MW-3 in locations anticipated to be downgradient of the former UST basin and MW-4 in a
location anticipated to be upgradient of the former UST basin.

The results of the Phase I and II LSA groundwater analyses indicated that C9-C18 aromatics,
total C9-C22 aromatics, naphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene were detected above the
North Carolina groundwater standards in TMW-1. Free product was not identified, and no
compound concentrations exceeded their DEQ-defined Gross Contamination Levels (GCLs). No
compound concentrations were detected above laboratory detection limits in monitoring wells
MW-2 through MW-4 and water supply well WSW-1.

Because water supply wells are located within 1,000 ft of the site, post-excavation confirmation
soil sample concentrations exceed soil-to-groundwater MSCCs, and petroleum compounds
exceed the North Carolina groundwater standards, H&H recommended that a Comprehensive
Site Assessment (CSA) be completed for the site in accordance with DEQ guidance. In a letter
dated February 8, 2011, DEQ requested that a CSA be completed in accordance with applicable
guidelines. In subsequent phone calls between H&H and DEQ, DEQ approved limited CSA
activities based on the lack of significant soil and groundwater impacts at the site.

Limited CSA activities were conducted in August and September 2011. The activities included
installation of one deep monitoring well, sampling five groundwater monitoring wells, and
sampling the two closest downgradient water supply wells to the source area. Target compound
concentrations in groundwater samples were detected above the North Carolina groundwater

5
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
standards in shallow source area monitoring well TMW-1 only. No concentrations exceed GCLs
and no free product was detected in any of the monitoring wells. Additionally, no target
compounds were detected above laboratory detection limits in the two closest downgradient
water supply wells to the source area.

Based on the results of the limited CSA activities conducted by H&H, DEQ issued an NORR
letter dated December 5, 2011 requesting a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) be completed for the
site. H&H prepared a Natural Attenuation CAP dated August 10, 2012, which identified natural
attenuation as the most cost-effective means to remediate petroleum-impacted soil and
groundwater at the former Dietz Trucking Terminal site. The CAP was approved by DEQ in an
NORR letter dated August 20, 2012.

6
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
3.0 Summary of Potential Receptor Information

3.1 Water Supply Wells

H&H conducted a water supply well survey for the area within a 1,500-ft radius of the former
UST basin during the Phase I and II LSA and updated during the limited CSA activities, as
necessary. The survey was conducted by performing area reconnaissance and checking for
municipal water connections. H&H also conducted an extended survey of properties within
500 ft of the UST area, which included contacts with knowledgeable personnel at those adjacent
properties with structures present.

The results of the survey indicated that city water is available to properties within a 1,500-foot
radius of the site. Eleven water supply wells were identified at or within 1,000 ft of the source
area. Of these, eight are utilized for drinking water and three are not used.

The approximate water supply well locations are depicted on Figure 3, and supply well owner
information and well specifics are presented in Table 1.

3.2 Surface Water

The closest surface water body is an unnamed intermittent stream located approximately 300 ft
southwest of the source area (Figures 1 and 3). Henry Fork River is located approximately 2,500
ft south of the source area. Henry Fork River is designated as a “Class C” surface water body in
the vicinity of the site.

7
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
4.0 Groundwater Monitoring

4.1 Water Levels

On June 6, 2023, the depths to groundwater were measured in monitoring wells TMW-1, MW-2,
MW-3, and MW-4 (Table 2). Depths to groundwater at the site were approximately 11 to 14 ft
below ground surface. No free product was detected in the monitoring wells during gauging.

Calculated groundwater elevations are presented on Figure 4. Based on these data, the estimated
shallow groundwater flow is to the southwest at the subject property.

4.2 Monitoring Well Analytical Data

On June 6, 2023, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells TMW-1, MW-2,
MW-3, and MW-4. Prior to sampling, the wells were purged until pH, temperature, and
conductivity stabilized. Groundwater samples were then collected using dedicated polyethylene
bailers, poured in laboratory supplied containers marked with identifying labels, and placed in an
iced cooler for shipment under chain-of-custody protocol to a certified laboratory for analyses.

The groundwater samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA
Method 6200B and semi-VOCs by EPA Method 625. The chain-of-custody records and
laboratory analytical data sheets are provided in Appendix A.

As shown in Table 3, naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene were detected
above the groundwater standards in TMW-1. No compound concentrations exceeded their DEQ-
defined GCLs in TMW-1. Additionally, no compound concentrations were detected above the
groundwater standards in the remaining monitoring wells.

8
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
5.0 Groundwater Modeling Evaluation

As previously discussed, the DEQ approved CAP identified natural attenuation as the most cost-
effective means to remediate petroleum-impacted soil and groundwater at the former Dietz
Trucking Terminal site. To expedite site closure, H&H conducted conservative screening level
groundwater modeling and a plume stability analysis to evaluate groundwater plume migration
and the potential for future water supply well impact from the diesel related compound
naphthalene. Please note that 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene also currently
exceed the groundwater standards in source area well TMW-1. These compounds were not
modeled because they are anticipated to degrade and migrate in groundwater similarly to
naphthalene, and as such, are unlikely to impact downgradient potential receptors.

5.1 Slug Testing

As part of the fate and transport modeling, slug tests were performed on monitoring wells MW-2
and MW-3 during the June 2023 groundwater sampling activities to calculate site-specific
hydrogeologic data. A slug of water was removed from the wells using an 83-inch long
disposable bailer and the water level recovery in the wells was monitored over time. The slug
test data were analyzed using the method of Bouwer and Rice. The slug test results are
summarized in Table 4, and the slug test data are included in Appendix B.

The slug data indicate that the hydraulic conductivity at the site ranged from 0.96 ft/day to 1.23
ft/day with a geometric mean of 1.11 ft/day in the shallow monitoring wells. Based on the
shallow hydraulic gradient of 0.03 ft/ft, hydraulic conductivity geometric mean of 1.11 ft/day,
and assumed effective porosity of 0.2, the calculated shallow groundwater velocity is
approximately 65 ft/yr.

5.2 Groundwater Fate and Transport Modeling

To evaluate the downgradient extent of naphthalene in groundwater and to predict future plume
migration, H&H conducted groundwater contaminant transport modeling using BIOSCREEN,

9
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
Version 1.4 software (see EPA publication EPA/600/R-96/087, August 1996). This model is
based on the Domenico analytical solution to groundwater transport which considers chemical
advection, dispersion, adsorption, biodegradation, and saturated zone source area mass.

Model Calibration
Based on the site groundwater flow direction to the southwest towards an unnamed tributary of
Henry Fork River, the model was developed and calibrated using naphthalene concentrations
from source area well TMW-1 through downgradient well MW-2. The geometric mean of
hydraulic conductivities from the slug tests, a hydraulic gradient of 0.03 ft/ft based on June 2023
gauging data, an average effective porosity of 0.2, and the average seepage velocity calculated
for the site from the slug test data of approximately 65 ft/yr were utilized in the model. Other
model input parameters and their derivations are included:

• longitudinal and transverse dispersivities of 6.5 ft and 0.2 ft , respectively (model
calibrated values);
• bulk density of 1.5 kg/L (typical value for saprolite);
• fraction organic carbon value of 0.0001 (based on typical default value and model
calibration);
• retardation factors of 1.7 (based on model calibration);
• estimated first order degradation rates based on model calibrations of 3.5/yr;
• 15 ft wide and 10 ft thick source term dimensions (based on source area and model
calibrations); and,
• Initial source area masses of approximately 0.2 kilograms (Kg) (based on model
calibration).

Using the parameters listed above and using source area soil and groundwater concentrations
from 2010 (when the UST was removed), the model was calibrated to provide the contaminant
distribution along the plume centerline and transverse of the plume centerline in 2023 (or 13
years since 2010). A summary of the model calibration is provided in Table 5, and the model
calibration output sheets are provided in Appendix C.

10
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
As shown in Table 5, the model calculated TMW-1 and MW-2 naphthalene concentrations
generally matched the actual concentrations. Based on the overall good model agreement with
groundwater concentrations, the model is considered well-calibrated for the intended purpose.

Predictive Modeling Results
Following calibration, H&H modeled naphthalene transport to predict the future concentrations
and extents of this compound in groundwater. The results of the future predictive modeling
indicate that groundwater impacts and extents will decrease with time and that naphthalene
concentrations equal to or above the 2L Standard will extend to a maximum distance of
approximately 49 ft from the source area, and naphthalene concentrations above the laboratory
detection limits will extend to a maximum distance of approximately 81 ft from the source area.
As such, naphthalene should not be detected above the laboratory detection limit or its 2L
Standard at the unnamed tributary of Henry Fork River located approximately 300 ft
downgradient of the source area. Additionally, by a time of 5 years from the present (the year
2018), the model predicts that the naphthalene groundwater plume edge has begun to shrink back
towards the source area. The predictive modeling results are provided in Appendix C and
summarized in Table 5.

5.3 Naphthalene Plume Stability and Degradation Rate Constant Evaluation

H&H conducted an evaluation of plume stability and fate for groundwater source area impacts at
the site. The evaluation included performing a Mann-Kendall statistical analysis and calculating
a degradation rate constant (kpoint) for naphthalene groundwater concentrations in source area
well TMW-1. The GSI Mann-Kendall Toolkit spreadsheet and a plot of the naphthalene
concentrations vs time with a linear regression analysis are included in Appendix D.

Because of slight differences in concentrations, the Mann-Kendall analysis was performed using
both the EPA Method 602/6200B and EPA Method 625 naphthalene data from source area well
TMW-1. As indicated in Appendix D, the results of the Mann-Kendall analysis indicate that the
naphthalene concentration trends in source area well TMW-1 are either stable or “No Trend”.

11
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
The GSI Mann-Kendall Toolkit User’s Manual (November 2012) indicates the following with
regard to a “No Trend” finding:
“A statistical result of “No Trend” indicates that the concentration cannot be determined to be either increasing or decreasing over time with sufficient statistical confidence. This outcome differs from “Stable,” which also indicates neither an increasing nor a decreasing trend, but
with less variability in concentrations from one sampling episode to the
next. However, in practical terms, if the purpose of the Mann-Kendall analysis is to determine whether the plume is increasing, stable, or decreasing over time, a “No Trend” result can be considered as evidence that the plume concentration is not increasing at the relevant sampling
point, similar to a “Stable” result.”

As such, the plume stability analysis indicates that the naphthalene concentrations in the source
area are currently stable.

To further evaluate the stability and fate of the groundwater naphthalene impacts, a linear
regression analysis was conducted to determine the slope of a “best-fit” line to historical
naphthalene concentrations in TMW-1 to predict when naphthalene concentrations in the source
area may achieve the groundwater standard of 6 ug/L. Because the Mann-Kendall analysis of
historical naphthalene data indicated the source area plume is currently stable, only data from the
last two sampling events (2017 and 2023) were utilized in the linear regression analysis in order
to evaluate more recent site conditions (last 6 years). Based on the linear regression, the kpoint for
TMW-1 is approximately 0.081 per year. The y-intercept is calculated to be approximately 390
µg/L.

The time to reach the 2L Standard was calculated with the following formula: Time (years since
2017) = -Ln (6 ug/L (2L goal) / y-intercept) / kpoint. By entering kpoint and y-intercept values into
the formula, the estimated time to reach the 2L Standard under current site conditions (from the
year 2017) in TMW-1 is calculated to be approximately 51.5 years (or the year 2069).

12
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
6.0 Conclusions, Recommendations, and Certification

Groundwater sampling activities were conducted in June 2023 at the former Dietz trucking
terminal. The activities included sampling three groundwater monitoring wells TMW-1, MW-2,
MW-3, and MW-4, and conducting slug testing in monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3.
Conservative fate and transport modeling was conducted using the results of current and
historical groundwater concentration results and hydrogeologic data calculated from slug test
data. The sampling and modeling results indicate the following:

• Petroleum compounds were detected above the North Carolina groundwater standards in
monitoring well TMW-1. No concentrations exceed GCLs and no free product was
detected in any of the monitoring wells. The horizontal and vertical extent of
groundwater impacts above standards is well defined and is limited to a small area in the
area of the former diesel UST.

• Conservative groundwater fate and transport modeling indicates naphthalene
concentrations equal to or above the 2L Standard will extend to a maximum distance of
approximately 49 ft from the source area, and naphthalene concentrations above the
laboratory detection limits will extend to a maximum distance of approximately 81 ft
from the source area.

• A GSI Mann-Kendall statistical analysis indicates naphthalene concentrations in the
source area are currently stable, and the estimated time required to reach the naphthalene
2L Standard in source area monitoring well TMW-1 is approximately 51.5 years (from the
year 2017) based on a linear regression analysis.

Based on the result of the groundwater sampling, groundwater fate and transport modeling, and
plume stability evaluation, naphthalene should not be detected above the laboratory detection
limit or its 2L Standard at the unnamed tributary of Henry Fork River located approximately 300
ft downgradient of the source area, and the threat of impacts to on-site and off-site water supply
13
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Monitoring Report.doc
wells appears to be low. As a result, H&H recommends that the risk ranking for the site be
reduced to low risk and that DEQ issue an NFA for the UST release.
Certification:
1. This report was submitted on-time.
2.This report meets the template requirements for information.
3.The schedule for any proposed attenuation approved in the CAP is being met.4.There are no other suspected source zone soils or free product outside of the assessedareas.5.There has not been an unexpected increase in contaminant mass to suggest a new release
or separate source.
I, Stephen Libbey, PG for Hart & Hickman, PC do certify that the information contained in this
report is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Hart & Hickman, PC is licensed to practice geology and engineering in North Carolina. The
certification numbs are C-245 and C-1269, respectively.
08/10/23
WSW-1 Rose Dietz 8814 Dietz Ave
Hickory, NC 28601
c/o Alan Dietz
800-438-8244 x3013 Yes Drinking Unknown Unknown Unknown 530 Northeast
WSW-2 Kent Anderson 3905 Brittain Street
Hickory, NC 28602 828-397-6841 Yes Drinking 20 None None 560 Northwest
WSW-3 Julia Jones 3895 Brittain Street
Hickory, NC 28602 Unknown Yes Drinking Unknown Unknown Unknown 660 North
WSW-4 Phyllis Yost 3955 Martin Fish Pond Road
Hickory, NC 28602 828-396-5717 Not since
2006 Drinking >200 Unknown Unknown 660 West
WSW-5 Dorothy Franklin 3900 Brittain Street
Hickory, NC 28602 828-397-3246 Yes Drinking 40 None None 770 Northwest
WSW-6 Boyd Lail 4130 Countryside Drive
Hickory, NC 28602 828-397-3951 Yes Drinking 52 None None 810 Southwest
WSW-7 Peter Rhyne 3945 Martin Fish Pond Road
Hickory, NC 28602 828-397-3884 Yes Drinking Unknown Unknown Unknown 820 Northwest
WSW-8 Dale Clark 4055 Martin Fish Pond Road
Hickory, NC 28602 828-397-3574 No; City
water in use Inactive Unknown Unknown Unknown 860 Southwest
WSW-9 Kenneth Baker 3890 Brittain Street
Hickory, NC 28602 828-397-2496 Yes Drinking 50 None None 870 North
WSW-10 Girthie Teague 3975 Martin Fish Pond Road
Hickory, NC 28602 828-397-3488 Yes Drinking 175 Unknown None 930 West
WSW-11 Judy Evans 8850 Dietz Avenue
Hickory, NC 28602 828-495-4176 No; City
water in use Inactive Uknown Unknown None 1,000 Northeast
Notes:
Information taken from Burke County, NC Website and interviews with land owners.
Refer to Figure 3 for locations.
ft = feet; bgs = below ground surface
Well Screen
Interval
(ft bgs)
Distance
from Source
Area (ft)
Well Casing
Depth
(ft bgs)
Well Depth
(ft bgs)Well In UsePhone Number
Table 1
Receptor Information
Former Dietz Trucking Terminal
Hickory, North Carolina
Figure 3
Map ID
H&H Job No. ROS-001
Location
Relative to
Site
Well Owner Address Type of Well
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Tables/2023Tables.xls8/7/2023
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2
Summary of Groundwater Level DataFormer Dietz Trucking Terminal
Hickory, North Carolina
H&H Job No. ROS-001
Well ID Date
Installed
TOC
Elevation
Total Depth
(ft)
Screen
Length (ft)
Approximate
Screened Interval
(ft)
Depth to
Water from
TOC (ft)
GW Elevation
(ft)
10/27/10 14.66 85.34
12/03/12 15.46 84.54
02/25/14 12.35 87.65
08/12/15 12.91 87.65
10/24/16 14.40 85.60
10/20/17 13.43 86.57
06/06/23 11.38 88.62
12/20/10 15.03 84.29
12/03/12 15.76 83.56
02/25/14 12.66 86.66
08/12/15 13.22 86.10
10/25/16 14.83 84.49
10/19/17 13.69 85.63
06/06/23 11.48 87.84
12/20/10 15.66 84.70
12/03/12 16.47 83.89
02/25/14 13.27 87.09
08/12/15 13.83 86.53
10/25/16 15.53 84.83
10/19/17 14.44 85.92
06/06/23 12.14 88.22
12/20/10 13.91 85.71
12/03/12 14.70 84.92
02/25/14 11.79 87.83
08/12/15 12.35 87.27
10/25/16 13.74 85.88
10/19/17 12.81 86.81
06/06/23 11.78 87.84
08/14/11 16.88 NA
12/03/12 16.03 NA
02/25/14 12.84 NA
08/12/15 14.20 NA
10/25/16 15.08 NA
10/19/17 14.03 NA
Notes:
TOC = Top of Casing; ft = feet
1522100.36MW-3
7-22152299.62MW-4
TMW-1
7-22152299.32MW-2
52-57
12-2715
7-22
DMW-1 57NM
27100.00
5
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Tables/2023Tables.xls
8/7/2023
Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
MADEP
VPH
MADEP
VPH
MADEP
EPH
MADEP
VPH/EPH
MADEP
EPH
MADEP
VPH
MADEP
EPH
MADEP
VPH/EPH
Sample ID
Date
Collected
Incident
Phase
10/27/10 LSA 160 1,180 11,100 12,280 1,990 1,380 8,250 9,630 <1.00 NA NA NA 33.4 NA NA <3.00 NA NA 1.13 NA NA 12.5 24.1 36.6 NA NA 15.8 161 30.9 NA NA
8/4/11*CSA <50 54 5,500 5,554 1,500 1,000 6,200 7,200 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <10 NA 15 78 33 NA NA
12/03/12 MNA <50 190 9,000 9,190 2,700 580 14,000 14,580 <0.50 NA NA NA 21 NA NA <5.0 260 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 4.0 4.0 <11 NA 18 85 31 110 150
2/25/142 MNA <100 <100 3,870 3,870 771 <100 5,440 5,440 <1.0 NA NA NA 18.3 <1.0 NA <1.0 106 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <2.0 7.0 <5.0 NA 7.4 112 10.5 NA NA
08/12/15 MNA 58 340 6,300 6,640 2,300 600 7,400 8,000 <0.50 NA NA NA 25 NA NA <5.0 190 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 8.0 8.6 <10 <10 15 140 25 140 190
10/25/16 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.50 NA NA NA 32 NA NA <5.0 190 NA <1.0 NA NA 1.0 13 14 <10 <10 12 98 16 110 140
10/20/175 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 61 NA NA <5.0 390 NA <1.0 NA NA 2.3 22 24 <11 <11 11 180 16 150 210
06/06/23 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.485 J 3.24 6.49 3.42 33.1 14.6 1.71 <0.140 248 19.1 <0.220 7.02 2.78 0.712 0.797 J 1.51 J 2.39 2.00 J 3.64 74.5 3.47 53.9 77.6
12/20/10 LSA <100 <100 <100 BDL <105 <100 <105 BDL <1.00 NA NA NA <1 NA NA NA NA NA <1 NA NA NA NA <3 <10 NA <10 <10 <10 NA <10
8/4/11*CSA <50 <50 <100 BDL <100 <50 <100 BDL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <10 NA <10 <10 <10 NA <10
12/03/12 MNA <50 <50 <100 BDL <100 <50 <100 BDL NA NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA NA <5.0 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 NA <3.0 <10 NA <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
02/25/14 MNA <50 <50 <105 BDL <105 <50 <105 BDL <1.0 NA NA NA <1.0 <1.0 NA <1.0 <2.0 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <5.0 NA <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 NA NA
08/12/15 MNA <50 <50 <350 BDL <500 <50 <100 BDL <0.50 NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA <5.0 <5.0 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
10/25/164 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.50 NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA <5.0 <5.0 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
10/19/17 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.50 NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA <5.0 <5.0 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11
06/06/23 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.180 <0.180 0.205 J 0.214 J <0.170 <0.180 <0.089 0.474 J <0.470 <0.190 <0.220 <0.190 <0.180 <0.210 <0.420 <0.21 <0.302 <0.856 <0.807 <0.728 <0.428 <1.14 <0.666
12/20/10 LSA <100 <100 <100 BDL <100 <100 <100 BDL <1.00 NA NA NA <1 NA NA NA NA NA <1 NA NA NA NA <3 <10 NA <10 <10 <10 NA <10
8/4/2011*CSA <50 <50 <100 BDL <100 <50 <100 BDL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <10 NA <10 <10 <10 NA <10
12/03/12 MNA <50 <50 <100 BDL <100 <50 <100 BDL NA NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA NA <5.0 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 NA <3.0 <10 NA <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
02/25/14 MNA <50 <50 <112 BDL <112 <50 <112 BDL <1.0 NA NA NA <1.0 <1.0 NA <1.0 <2.0 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <5.0 NA <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 NA NA
08/12/15 MNA <50 <50 <350 BDL <500 <50 <100 BDL <0.50 NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA <5.0 <5.0 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
10/25/16 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.50 NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA <5.0 <5.0 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
10/19/17 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.50 NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA <5.0 <5.0 NA <1.0 NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <3.0 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11
06/06/23 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.180 <0.180 <0.200 <0.200 <0.170 <0.180 <0.089 <0.140 <0.470 <0.190 <0.220 <0.190 <0.180 <0.210 <0.420 <0.21 <0.302 <0.856 <0.807 <0.728 <0.428 <1.14 <0.666
400 NS NS 700 10,000 NS NS 200 1 70 70 70 600 70 25 20 6 70 600 400 400 500 500 500 80 NE 300 6 200 1 30
NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 5,000 6,900 8,800 70,000 80,000 30,500 11,700 20,000 6,000 26,100 260,000 28,500 24,100 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,950 1,550 845 6,000 550 1,000 12,000
Notes:
Apart from VPH and EPH, only compounds detected are shown.
Bold indicates concentration exceeds 2L standard
2L Standard = NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard; GCL = Gross Contaminant Level
MADEP = Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds; SVOCs = Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds; VPH = Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon; EPH = Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon
BDL = Below Detection Limit; NS = No Standard NA= Not Analyzed; LSA = Limited Site Assessment; CSA = Comprehensive Site Assessment; MNA = Monitored Natural Attenuation
J = Estimated concentration between the method detection limit and reporting limit.
* - Due to a laboratory error, EPA Method 625 samples collected on September 8, 2011. 1 - 37 µg/l of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate also detected in well on December 3, 2012. 2 - 5.2 µg/l of isopropylbenzene also detected in well on February 25, 2014.
3 - 14 µg/l of diethyl phthalate also detected in well on August 12, 2015.
4 - 15 µg/l of pentachlorophenol also detected in well on October 28, 2016.
5 - 0.95 µg/l of benzene also detected in well on October 20, 2017. Isopropylbenzene4-Isopropyltoluenen-Propylbenzene1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneMethyl Tert-Butyl EtherXylenesGCL (µg/l)
Contaminant of Concern
2L Standard (µg/l)EPH C11-C22 Aromatics Total C9-C18 AliphaticsMW-2
TMW-1 VPH C5-C8 Aliphatics VPH C9-C12 Aliphatics MW-3 EPH C9-C18 Aliphatics BenzeneH&H Job No. ROS-001
Naphthalenecis-1,2-Dichloroethylenesec-ButylbenzeneEthylbenzenen-ButylbenzeneAcenaphtheneDibenzofuran1-MethylnaphthaleneNaphthaleneFluoreneTable 3 (Page 1 of 2)
Summary of Groundwater Sampling Results
Former Dietz Trucking Terminal
Hickory, North Carolina
PhenanthreneAnalytical Method
EPH C19-C36 Aliphatics VOCs by 602/6200 SVOCs by 625
2-MethylnaphthaleneTotal C9-C22 AromaticsVPH C9-C10 Aromatics 1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneTolueneo-Xylenem&p-Xylenehttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Tables/2023Tables.xls
8/7/2023
Table 3 (Page 1 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
MADEP
VPH
MADEP
VPH
MADEP
EPH
MADEP
VPH/EPH
MADEP
EPH
MADEP
VPH
MADEP
EPH
MADEP
VPH/EPH 602 602 602 602 625 625 625 625 625
Sample ID
Date
Collected
Incident
Phase
12/20/10 LSA <100 <100 <100 BDL <100 <100 <100 BDL <1 NA <1 <3 <10 <10 <10 NA <10
8/4/11*LSA <50 <50 <100 BDL <100 <50 <100 BDL NA NA NA NA <10 <10 <10 NA <10
12/03/12 MNA <50 <50 <100 BDL <100 <50 <100 BDL <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
02/25/14 MNA <50 <50 <104 BDL <104 <50 <104 BDL <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <3.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 NA NA
8/12/153 MNA <50 <50 <350 BDL <500 <50 <100 BDL <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
10/25/16 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
10/19/17 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11
8/4/11*LSA <50 <50 <100 BDL <100 <50 <100 BDL <1 NA <1 <3 <10 <10 <10 NA <10
12/3/121 MNA <50 <50 <100 BDL <100 <50 <100 BDL <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
02/25/14 MNA <50 <50 <110 BDL <110 <50 <110 BDL <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <3.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 NA NA
08/12/15 MNA <50 <50 <350 BDL <500 <50 <100 BDL <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
10/25/16 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
10/19/17 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 <11 <11 <11 <11 <11
10/27/10 LSA <100 <100 <105 BDL <105 <100 <105 BDL <1 NA <1 <3 <10 <10 <10 NA <10
12/03/12 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
02/25/14 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
08/12/15 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
10/25/16 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
10/19/17 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
08/03/11 CSA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1 NA <1 <3 NA NA NA NA NA
02/25/14 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
08/04/11 CSA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1 NA <1 <3 NA NA NA NA NA
12/03/12 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
02/25/14 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
08/12/15 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
10/25/16 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
10/19/17 MNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 <3.0 NA NA NA NA NA
420 NS NS 4,200 42,000 NS NS 210 600 6 600 500 300 6 200 1 30
NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 84,500 6,000 260,000 85,500 990 6,000 410 1,000 12,500
Notes:
Apart from VPH and EPH, only those compounds detected are shown.
Bold indicates concentration exceeds 2L standard
2L Standard = NCAC 2L groundwater quality standard GCL = gross contaminant levelMADEP = Massachusetts Department of Environmental ProtectionVPH = Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon; EPH = Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon
NS = No Standard NA= Not Analyzed; LSA = Limited Site Assessment; CSA = Comprehensive Site Assessment; MNA = Monitored Natural Attenuation
* - Due to a laboratory error, EPA Method 625 samples collected on September 8, 2011. 1 - 37 µg/l of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate also detected in well on December 3, 2012. 2 - 5.2 µg/l of isopropylbenzene also detected in well on February 25, 2014.
3 - 14 µg/l of diethyl phthalate also detected in well on August 12, 2015.
Table 3 (Page 2 of 2)
Summary of Groundwater Sampling Results
Former Dietz Trucking Terminal
Hickory, North Carolina
H&H Job No. ROS-001
Analytical Method
Contaminant of Concern
VPH C5-C8 Aliphatics VPH C9-C12 Aliphatics EPH C9-C18 Aliphatics Total C9-C18 AliphaticsEPH C19-C36 Aliphatics VPH C9-C10 Aromatics EPH C11-C22 Aromatics Total C9-C22 AromaticsEthylbenzeneNaphthaleneTolueneXylenesFluoreneNaphthalenePhenanthrene1-Methylnaphthalene2-MethylnaphthaleneWSW-4
WSW-6
2L Standard (µg/l)
GCL (µg/l)
MW-4
DMW-1
WSW-1
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Tables/2023Tables.xls
8/7/2023
Table 3 (Page 2 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4
Summary of Slug Test Parameters
Former Dietz Trucking Terminal
Hickory, North Carolina
H&H Job No. ROS.001
Parameter
Slug Test Iteration Iteration 1 Iteration 2 Iteration 3 Iteration 1 Iteration 3
Aquifer Data
Estimated Depth to Confining Layer (ft bgs)
Estimated Saturated Thickness (ft)b 42.07 42.06 42.05 41.38 41.39
Anisotropy Ratio (Kv/Kh)Kv/Kh
Well Data
Difference in TOC and GSE (ft)
Depth to Water (ft bTOC)11.43 11.44 11.45 12.12 12.11
Depth to Water (ft bgs)11.93 11.94 11.95 12.62 12.61
Depth to Screen Top (ft bTOC)
Depth to Screen Top (ft bwt)d 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Depth of Well (ft bgs)
Total Depth of Well (ft bTOC)
Initial Displacement (ft)H(0)2.382 2.392 1.796 4.229 5.288
Static Water Column Height (ft)H 10.57 10.56 10.55 9.88 9.89
Depth to Top of Filter Pack* (ft bwt)-7.43 -7.44 -7.45 -8.12 -8.11
Sand Above Screen (ft)
Screen Length (ft)
Saturated Screen Length (ft)L 10.57 10.56 10.55 9.88 9.89
Sand Below Screen (ft)
Transducer Depth (ft bTOC)
Transducer Depth (ft bwt)T 8.57 8.56 8.55 7.38 7.39
Casing Radius (ft)r(c)
Equipment Radius (ft)r(eq)
Well Radius (ft)r(w)
Effective Casing Radius Correction
Filter Pack Porosity n 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
Apparent Initial Displacement (ft)H(0)+----------
Expected Initial Displacement (ft)H(0)*----------
Aquifer Type
Calculated Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/day)(1)0.96 1.23 1.21 0.98 1.04
Averaged Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/day)(1)
Geometric Mean of Averaged Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/day)
Notes:
-- = not applicable
Kv = vertical hydraulic conductivity; Kh = horizontal hydraulic conductivity; Eqn = equation
ft = feet; bgs = below ground surface; ags = above ground surface; bTOC = below top of casing; bwt = below static water level
0.083 0.083
1.11
Shallow Unconfined Aquifer
1.13 1.08
Bouwer and Rice (1976)Bouwer and Rice (1976)
0.340 0.340
0.025 0.025
0.0 0.0
15.00 15.0
20.0 20.0
22.50
7.00 7.00
3.0 3.0
22.00 22.00
1) Hydraulic conductivity values calculated using AQTESOLV© software (Version 4.5). Bouwer & Rice (1976) partial penetration single well test
solution for unconfined aquifers was applied using effective casing corrections from Bouwer & Rice (1976) or Butler (1998).
AQTESOLV
Parameter Name
MW-2 MW-3
54.0 54.0
0.5 0.5
0.50 0.50
22.50
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)/Sampling/0623/Tables/Table4.xlsx
8/7/2023
Table 4 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
MODEL CALIBRATIONWell IDDateApproximate Plume Centerline Downgradient Distance from Source Term (ft)Approximate Plume Transverse Downgradient Distance from Source Term (ft)Naphthalene Actual Concentration (µg/L)Naphthalene Model Concentration (µg/L)TMW-1 2013 Source Term Source Term 248 244MW-2 2013 30 16 BDL 0MODEL PREDICTIONDate20132018Table 5BIOSCREEN Model Calibration and Results78494700Former Dietz Trucking TerminalHickory, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ROS-001Approximate Maximum Plume Distance (ft)Approximate Distance to 2L Standard (ft)Exposure Point Concentration (Unnamed Tributary) ~300 ft Downgradient (µg/L)81https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Dietz Trucking (ROS‐001)/Sampling/0623/Tables/Table5.xlsxTable 8Hart & Hickman, PC
TITLE
PROJECT
SITE LOCATION MAP
FORMER DIETZ TRUCKING TERMINALHICKORY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE NO:
8-7-23 0
1ROS-001
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEETN
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
LONGVIEW, NC 1993
SITE
DIE
T
Z

A
V
E
I-40
E
A
S
T
B
O
U
N
D
I-40
W
E
S
T
B
O
U
N
D
SITE MAP
FORMER DIETZ TRUCKING
8814 DIETZ AVE
HICKORY, NC
TRUCKING
TERMINAL
GARAGE
ASPHALT
LOT
GRAVEL
TURN-AROUND
CONC
R
E
T
E
A
P
R
O
N
ASPHALT LOT
ASPHALT LOT
FORMER UST #2
LOCATION
WSW-1
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)\Sampling\0917\Figures\FIG-2.dwg, FIG 2, 9/21/2018 2:54:08 PM,8-7-23
1000
1500
500
WATER SUPPLY WELL SURVEY AND ADJACENT
PROPERTY OWNERS MAP
FORMER DIETZ TRUCKING
8814 DIETZ AVE
HICKORY, NC
WSW-3
WSW-1
WSW-5
WSW-2WSW-7
WSW-4
WSW-6
WSW-10
WSW-9
WSW-8
WSW-11
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)\Sampling\0917\Figures\FIG-3.dwg, FIG-3B, 9/21/2018 2:54:58 PM,8-7-23
MW-4
TMW-1
MW-2
DMW-1
MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS AND
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS MAP
FORMER DIETZ TRUCKING
8814 DIETZ AVE
HICKORY, NC
GARAGE
ASPHALT LOT
LIMITS OF UST EXCAVATION
ASPHALT LOT
MW-3
BUILDING
DIRT SLOPE
(88.62)
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
88.0
(87.84)
(88.22)
(88.62)
(87.84)*
88
.0
88
.588.08
8
.
5
NOTES:
1.* = NOT USED FOR CONTOURING
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dietz Trucking (ROS-001)\Sampling\0917\Figures\FIG-4.dwg, FIG 3, 6/15/2023 10:45:48 AM, bwest

Appendix A
Laboratory Analytical Data

Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.

6/15/2023
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte) Bo Cappleman
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100 Charlotte, NC, 28203
Ref: Analytical Testing
Lab Report Number: 23-159-0012 Client Project Description: ROS-001
Dear Bo Cappleman:
Waypoint Analytical, LLC (Charlotte) received sample(s) on 6/7/2023 for the analyses presented in the
following report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in accordance with the applicable analytical method.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all parameters were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA (including 40 CFR 136
Method Update Rule May 2021) unless otherwise indicated. Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as-received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report. Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely,
Angela D Overcash Senior Project Manager
Page 1 of 41
Certification Summary
Laboratory ID: WP CNC: Waypoint Analytical Carolina, Inc. (C), Charlotte, NC
State Program Lab ID Expiration Date
07/31/202337735State ProgramNorth Carolina
12/31/2023402State ProgramNorth Carolina
07/31/202399012State ProgramSouth Carolina
12/31/202299012State ProgramSouth Carolina
Page 1 of 1 00016/23-159-0012
Page 2 of 41
Report Number:
Sample Summary Table
Client Project Description:
23-159-0012
ROS-001
Lab No Client Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received
06/06/2023 11:15Aqueous 97848 MW-2 06/07/2023 16:28
06/06/2023 10:02Aqueous 97849 MW-3 06/07/2023 16:28
06/06/2023 12:20Aqueous 97850 TMW-1 06/07/2023 16:28
Page 3 of 41
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
23-159-0012
Report Limit
Project:ROS-001
V 97848MW-2
J0.205 06/13/2023 20:386200Bsec-Butyl benzene µg/L 0.200
J0.214 06/13/2023 20:386200Bcis-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/L 0.200
J0.474 06/13/2023 20:386200BMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)µg/L 0.140
V 97850TMW-1
J0.485 06/13/2023 21:276200BBenzeneµg/L 0.180
3.24 06/13/2023 21:276200Bn-Butylbenzene µg/L 0.180
6.49 06/13/2023 21:276200Bsec-Butyl benzene µg/L 0.200
3.42 06/13/2023 21:276200Bcis-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/L 0.200
33.1 06/13/2023 21:276200BEthylbenzeneµg/L 0.170
14.6 06/13/2023 21:276200BIsopropylbenzeneµg/L 0.180
1.71 06/13/2023 21:276200B4-Isopropyl toluene µg/L 0.089
248 06/14/2023 21:326200BNaphthaleneµg/L 4.70
19.1 06/13/2023 21:276200Bn-Propylbenzene µg/L 0.190
7.02 06/13/2023 21:276200B1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.190
2.78 06/13/2023 21:276200B1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/L 0.180
0.712 06/13/2023 21:276200Bo-Xylene µg/L 0.210
J0.797 06/13/2023 21:276200Bm,p-Xylene µg/L 0.420
J1.51 06/13/2023 21:276200BXylene (Total)µg/L 0.210
2.39 06/13/2023 16:14625.1 Acenaphthene µg/L 0.302
J2.00 06/13/2023 16:14625.1 Dibenzofuran µg/L 0.856
3.64 06/13/2023 16:14625.1 Fluorene µg/L 0.807
53.9 06/13/2023 16:14625.1 1-Methylnaphthalene µg/L 1.14
77.6 06/13/2023 16:14625.1 2-Methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.666
74.5 06/13/2023 16:14625.1 Naphthalene µg/L 0.728
3.47 06/13/2023 16:14625.1 Phenanthrene µg/L 0.428
Page 4 of 41

Client: Hart & Hickman (Charlotte) CASE NARRATIVE
Project: ROS-001 Lab Report Number: 23-159-0012
Date: 6/15/2023
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS Method 625.1 Sample 97848 (MW-2) QC Batch No: V34273/V34220
Surrogate(s) were flagged for recoveries in the associated project sample. During the extraction step, the extraction technician noted that a significant emulsion formed. Batch QC samples (Method Blank and Laboratory
Control Samples) all showed surrogate recoveries within QC limits, indicating that the biased recoveries were due to the sample matrix.
Analyte: 2-Chloronaphthalene
QC Batch No: V34273/V34220 This target analyte was flagged for recoveries outside QC limits in the associated LCS/LCSD. Data for this
analyte is flagged "M" to indicate that results should be considered minimum concentration due to the potential for a low bias.
Analyte: Benzidine
QC Batch No: V34273/V34220 This target analyte was flagged for recoveries outside QC limits in the associated LCS/LCSD. Data for this
analyte is flagged "M" to indicate that results should be considered minimum concentration due to the potential for a low bias.
Analyte: Benzoic Acid QC Batch No: V34273/V34220 Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits.
Analyte: Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
QC Batch No: V34273/V34220 Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits.

Page 5 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97848 Matrix:
6/6/2023 11:15
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 10.0Acetone 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Benzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500Bromobenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00Bromochloromethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.500Bromodichloromethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.00Bromoform 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.280 µg/L 0.280 1.00Bromomethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500n-Butylbenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
0.205 J
µg/L 0.200 0.500
sec-Butyl benzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.920 µg/L 0.920 2.00tert-Butyl benzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Carbon Tetrachloride 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorodibromomethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.430 µg/L 0.430 1.00Chloroethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Chloroform 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Chloromethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5002-Chlorotoluene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5004-Chlorotoluene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.500 µg/L 0.500 0.500Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 2.001,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,2-Dibromoethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.230 µg/L 0.230 0.500Dibromomethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 6 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97848 Matrix:
6/6/2023 11:15
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.5001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.5001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<1.20 µg/L 1.20 5.00Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.240 µg/L 0.240 0.5001,1-Dichloroethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,2-Dichloroethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,1-Dichloroethene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
0.214 J µg/L 0.200 0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2-Dichloropropane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.130 µg/L 0.130 0.5001,3-Dichloropropane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 2.002,2-Dichloropropane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,1-Dichloropropene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.500trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<42.0 µg/L 42.0 200
Ethanol 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Ethylbenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.350 µg/L 0.350 3.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 1.002-Hexanone 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Isopropylbenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.089 µg/L 0.089 0.5004-Isopropyl toluene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.710 µg/L 0.710 5.00Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 7 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97848 Matrix:
6/6/2023 11:15
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00
0.474 J µg/L 0.140 1.00Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.078 µg/L 0.078 1.004-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.330 µg/L 0.330 2.00Methylene Chloride 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.470 µg/L 0.470 1.00Naphthalene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500n-Propylbenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Styrene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Tetrachloroethene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Toluene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 0.5001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.310 µg/L 0.310 0.5001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.096 µg/L 0.096 0.5001,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Trichloroethene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.270 µg/L 0.270 0.5001,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.5001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<1.00 µg/L 1.00 5.00Vinyl Acetate 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Vinyl Chloride 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500o-Xylene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 8 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97848 Matrix:
6/6/2023 11:15
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00m,p-Xylene 1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331MSA
<0.21 µg/L 0.210 0.500Xylene (Total)1 06/13/23 20:38 V34331
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 20:381 MSA V34331
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 101 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 20:381 MSA V34331
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 104 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 20:381 MSA V34331
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.2 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 20:381 MSA V34331
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<0.302 µg/L 0.302 2.00Acenaphthene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.297 µg/L 0.297 2.00Acenaphthylene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.836 µg/L 0.836 2.00Anthracene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.32 M
µg/L 1.32 10.0
Benzidine 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.637 µg/L 0.637 2.00Benzo(a)anthracene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.02 µg/L 1.02 2.00Benzo(a)pyrene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<2.49 µg/L 2.49 5.00Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.01 µg/L 1.01 5.00Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.99 µg/L 1.99 5.00Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 10.0Benzoic Acid 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.684 µg/L 0.684 5.00
Benzyl alcohol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.468 µg/L 0.468 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 9 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97848 Matrix:
6/6/2023 11:15
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<1.04 µg/L 1.04 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.08 µg/L 1.08 5.00Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<3.46 µg/L 3.46 10.0Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.004-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.83 µg/L 1.83 5.00Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.18 µg/L 1.18 5.004-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<7.38 M µg/L 7.38 20.02-Chloronaphthalene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.938 µg/L 0.938 10.02-Chlorophenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.71 µg/L 1.71 5.00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.405 µg/L 0.405 2.00Chrysene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.856 µg/L 0.856 5.00Dibenzofuran 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.89 µg/L 1.89 5.00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.46 µg/L 1.46 10.02,4-Dichlorophenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.745 µg/L 0.745 5.00Diethyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.939 µg/L 0.939 5.00Dimethyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.57 µg/L 1.57 20.02,4-Dimethylphenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<2.06 µg/L 2.06 5.00Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<2.07 µg/L 2.07 10.04,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 10 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97848 Matrix:
6/6/2023 11:15
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<1.92 µg/L 1.92 10.02,4-Dinitrophenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.002,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.809 µg/L 0.809 5.002,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.65 µg/L 1.65 5.00Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.250 µg/L 0.250 2.00Fluoranthene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.807 µg/L 0.807 2.00Fluorene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.979 µg/L 0.979 5.00Hexachlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<2.73 µg/L 2.73 5.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.76 µg/L 1.76 5.00Hexachloroethane 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.477 µg/L 0.477 2.00Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.444 µg/L 0.444 5.00Isophorone 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.14 µg/L 1.14 2.001-Methylnaphthalene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.666 µg/L 0.666 2.002-Methylnaphthalene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.728 µg/L 0.728 2.00Naphthalene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.905 µg/L 0.905 5.00
Nitrobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.493 µg/L 0.493 5.002-Nitrophenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.23 µg/L 1.23 10.04-Nitrophenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 5.00N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.641 µg/L 0.641 5.00N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.43 µg/L 1.43 5.00Pentachlorophenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.428 µg/L 0.428 2.00Phenanthrene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 11 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97848 Matrix:
6/6/2023 11:15
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<0.651 µg/L 0.651 5.00Phenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Pyrene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<2.21 µg/L 2.21 5.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
<1.32 µg/L 1.32 5.002,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 06/13/23 15:52 V34273AMP
625.1Surrogate: Phenol-d5 13.9 Limits: 10-63%06/13/23 15:521 AMP
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 48.2 *Limits: 49-118%06/13/23 15:521 AMP V34273
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 23.8 Limits: 22-84%06/13/23 15:521 AMP V34273
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 48.6 Limits: 43-123%06/13/23 15:521 AMP V34273
Surrogate: 4-Terphenyl-d14 63.2 Limits: 49-151%06/13/23 15:521 AMP V34273
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 55.6 Limits: 31-144%06/13/23 15:521 AMP V34273
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 12 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-3
97849 Matrix:
6/6/2023 10:02
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 10.0Acetone 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Benzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500Bromobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00Bromochloromethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.500Bromodichloromethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.00Bromoform 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.280 µg/L 0.280 1.00Bromomethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500n-Butylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.500
sec-Butyl benzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.920 µg/L 0.920 2.00tert-Butyl benzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Carbon Tetrachloride 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorodibromomethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.430 µg/L 0.430 1.00Chloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Chloroform 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Chloromethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5002-Chlorotoluene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5004-Chlorotoluene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.500 µg/L 0.500 0.500Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 2.001,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,2-Dibromoethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.230 µg/L 0.230 0.500Dibromomethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 13 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-3
97849 Matrix:
6/6/2023 10:02
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.5001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.5001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<1.20 µg/L 1.20 5.00Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.240 µg/L 0.240 0.5001,1-Dichloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,2-Dichloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,1-Dichloroethene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2-Dichloropropane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.130 µg/L 0.130 0.5001,3-Dichloropropane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 2.002,2-Dichloropropane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,1-Dichloropropene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.500trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<42.0 µg/L 42.0 200
Ethanol 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Ethylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.350 µg/L 0.350 3.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 1.002-Hexanone 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Isopropylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.089 µg/L 0.089 0.5004-Isopropyl toluene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.710 µg/L 0.710 5.00Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 14 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-3
97849 Matrix:
6/6/2023 10:02
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00
<0.140 µg/L 0.140 1.00Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.078 µg/L 0.078 1.004-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.330 µg/L 0.330 2.00Methylene Chloride 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.470 µg/L 0.470 1.00Naphthalene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500n-Propylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Styrene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Tetrachloroethene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Toluene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 0.5001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.310 µg/L 0.310 0.5001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.096 µg/L 0.096 0.5001,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Trichloroethene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.270 µg/L 0.270 0.5001,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.5001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<1.00 µg/L 1.00 5.00Vinyl Acetate 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Vinyl Chloride 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500o-Xylene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 15 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-3
97849 Matrix:
6/6/2023 10:02
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00m,p-Xylene 1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331MSA
<0.21 µg/L 0.210 0.500Xylene (Total)1 06/13/23 21:02 V34331
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 104 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 21:021 MSA V34331
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 101 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 21:021 MSA V34331
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 104 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 21:021 MSA V34331
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.6 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 21:021 MSA V34331
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<0.302 µg/L 0.302 2.00Acenaphthene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.297 µg/L 0.297 2.00Acenaphthylene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.836 µg/L 0.836 2.00Anthracene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.32 M
µg/L 1.32 10.0
Benzidine 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.637 µg/L 0.637 2.00Benzo(a)anthracene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.02 µg/L 1.02 2.00Benzo(a)pyrene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<2.49 µg/L 2.49 5.00Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.01 µg/L 1.01 5.00Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.99 µg/L 1.99 5.00Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 10.0Benzoic Acid 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.684 µg/L 0.684 5.00
Benzyl alcohol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.468 µg/L 0.468 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 16 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-3
97849 Matrix:
6/6/2023 10:02
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<1.04 µg/L 1.04 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.08 µg/L 1.08 5.00Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<3.46 µg/L 3.46 10.0Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.004-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.83 µg/L 1.83 5.00Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.18 µg/L 1.18 5.004-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<7.38 M µg/L 7.38 20.02-Chloronaphthalene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.938 µg/L 0.938 10.02-Chlorophenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.71 µg/L 1.71 5.00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.405 µg/L 0.405 2.00Chrysene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.856 µg/L 0.856 5.00Dibenzofuran 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.89 µg/L 1.89 5.00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.46 µg/L 1.46 10.02,4-Dichlorophenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.745 µg/L 0.745 5.00Diethyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.939 µg/L 0.939 5.00Dimethyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.57 µg/L 1.57 20.02,4-Dimethylphenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<2.06 µg/L 2.06 5.00Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<2.07 µg/L 2.07 10.04,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 17 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-3
97849 Matrix:
6/6/2023 10:02
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<1.92 µg/L 1.92 10.02,4-Dinitrophenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.002,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.809 µg/L 0.809 5.002,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.65 µg/L 1.65 5.00Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.250 µg/L 0.250 2.00Fluoranthene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.807 µg/L 0.807 2.00Fluorene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.979 µg/L 0.979 5.00Hexachlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<2.73 µg/L 2.73 5.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.76 µg/L 1.76 5.00Hexachloroethane 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.477 µg/L 0.477 2.00Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.444 µg/L 0.444 5.00Isophorone 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.14 µg/L 1.14 2.001-Methylnaphthalene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.666 µg/L 0.666 2.002-Methylnaphthalene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.728 µg/L 0.728 2.00Naphthalene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.905 µg/L 0.905 5.00
Nitrobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.493 µg/L 0.493 5.002-Nitrophenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.23 µg/L 1.23 10.04-Nitrophenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 5.00N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.641 µg/L 0.641 5.00N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.43 µg/L 1.43 5.00Pentachlorophenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.428 µg/L 0.428 2.00Phenanthrene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 18 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-3
97849 Matrix:
6/6/2023 10:02
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<0.651 µg/L 0.651 5.00Phenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Pyrene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<2.21 µg/L 2.21 5.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
<1.32 µg/L 1.32 5.002,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 06/13/23 15:30 V34273AMP
625.1Surrogate: Phenol-d5 14.4 Limits: 10-63%06/13/23 15:301 AMP
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 51.4 Limits: 49-118%06/13/23 15:301 AMP V34273
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 22.0 Limits: 22-84%06/13/23 15:301 AMP V34273
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 46.2 Limits: 43-123%06/13/23 15:301 AMP V34273
Surrogate: 4-Terphenyl-d14 69.4 Limits: 49-151%06/13/23 15:301 AMP V34273
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 60.6 Limits: 31-144%06/13/23 15:301 AMP V34273
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 19 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:TMW-1
97850 Matrix:
6/6/2023 12:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00 V34358 06/14/23 09:00
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 10.0Acetone 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
0.485 J µg/L 0.180 0.500Benzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500Bromobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00Bromochloromethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.500Bromodichloromethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.00Bromoform 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.280 µg/L 0.280 1.00Bromomethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
3.24 µg/L 0.180 0.500n-Butylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
6.49 µg/L 0.200 0.500
sec-Butyl benzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.920 µg/L 0.920 2.00tert-Butyl benzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Carbon Tetrachloride 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorodibromomethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.430 µg/L 0.430 1.00Chloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Chloroform 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Chloromethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5002-Chlorotoluene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5004-Chlorotoluene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.500 µg/L 0.500 0.500Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 2.001,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,2-Dibromoethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.230 µg/L 0.230 0.500Dibromomethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 20 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:TMW-1
97850 Matrix:
6/6/2023 12:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00 V34358 06/14/23 09:00
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.5001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.5001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<1.20 µg/L 1.20 5.00Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.240 µg/L 0.240 0.5001,1-Dichloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,2-Dichloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,1-Dichloroethene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
3.42 µg/L 0.200 0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2-Dichloropropane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.130 µg/L 0.130 0.5001,3-Dichloropropane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 2.002,2-Dichloropropane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,1-Dichloropropene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.500trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<42.0 µg/L 42.0 200
Ethanol 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
33.1 µg/L 0.170 0.500Ethylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.350 µg/L 0.350 3.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 1.002-Hexanone 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
14.6 µg/L 0.180 0.500Isopropylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
1.71 µg/L 0.089 0.5004-Isopropyl toluene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.710 µg/L 0.710 5.00Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 21 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:TMW-1
97850 Matrix:
6/6/2023 12:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00 V34358 06/14/23 09:00
<0.140 µg/L 0.140 1.00Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.078 µg/L 0.078 1.004-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.330 µg/L 0.330 2.00Methylene Chloride 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
248 µg/L 4.70 10.0Naphthalene 10 06/14/23 21:32 V34362MSA
19.1 µg/L 0.190 0.500n-Propylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Styrene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Tetrachloroethene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Toluene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 0.5001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.310 µg/L 0.310 0.5001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.096 µg/L 0.096 0.5001,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Trichloroethene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.270 µg/L 0.270 0.5001,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
7.02 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
2.78 µg/L 0.180 0.5001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<1.00 µg/L 1.00 5.00Vinyl Acetate 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Vinyl Chloride 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
0.712 µg/L 0.210 0.500o-Xylene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 22 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:TMW-1
97850 Matrix:
6/6/2023 12:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V34330 06/13/23 09:00 V34358 06/14/23 09:00
0.797 J µg/L 0.420 1.00m,p-Xylene 1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331MSA
1.51 J µg/L 0.210 0.500Xylene (Total)1 06/13/23 21:27 V34331
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 21:271 MSA V34331
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 99.8 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 21:271 MSA V34331
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 99.6 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 21:271 MSA V34331
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 98.0 Limits: 70-130%06/13/23 21:271 MSA V34331
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 Limits: 70-130%06/14/23 21:3210 MSA V34362
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 102 Limits: 70-130%06/14/23 21:3210 MSA V34362
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 105 Limits: 70-130%06/14/23 21:3210 MSA V34362
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 98.2 Limits: 70-130%06/14/23 21:3210 MSA V34362
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
2.39 µg/L 0.302 2.00Acenaphthene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.297 µg/L 0.297 2.00Acenaphthylene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.836 µg/L 0.836 2.00Anthracene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.32 M
µg/L 1.32 10.0
Benzidine 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.637 µg/L 0.637 2.00Benzo(a)anthracene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.02 µg/L 1.02 2.00Benzo(a)pyrene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<2.49 µg/L 2.49 5.00Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.01 µg/L 1.01 5.00Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 23 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:TMW-1
97850 Matrix:
6/6/2023 12:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<1.99 µg/L 1.99 5.00Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 10.0Benzoic Acid 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.684 µg/L 0.684 5.00Benzyl alcohol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.468 µg/L 0.468 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.04 µg/L 1.04 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.08 µg/L 1.08 5.00Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<3.46 µg/L 3.46 10.0Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.004-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.83 µg/L 1.83 5.00
Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.18 µg/L 1.18 5.004-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<7.38 M µg/L 7.38 20.02-Chloronaphthalene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.938 µg/L 0.938 10.02-Chlorophenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.71 µg/L 1.71 5.004-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.405 µg/L 0.405 2.00Chrysene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
2.00 J
µg/L 0.856 5.00
Dibenzofuran 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.89 µg/L 1.89 5.003,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.46 µg/L 1.46 10.02,4-Dichlorophenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.745 µg/L 0.745 5.00Diethyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 24 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:TMW-1
97850 Matrix:
6/6/2023 12:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<0.939 µg/L 0.939 5.00Dimethyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.57 µg/L 1.57 20.02,4-Dimethylphenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<2.06 µg/L 2.06 5.00Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<2.07 µg/L 2.07 10.04,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.92 µg/L 1.92 10.02,4-Dinitrophenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.002,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.809 µg/L 0.809 5.002,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.65 µg/L 1.65 5.00Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.250 µg/L 0.250 2.00
Fluoranthene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
3.64 µg/L 0.807 2.00Fluorene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.979 µg/L 0.979 5.00Hexachlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<2.73 µg/L 2.73 5.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.00Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.76 µg/L 1.76 5.00Hexachloroethane 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.477 µg/L 0.477 2.00Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.444 µg/L 0.444 5.00
Isophorone 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
53.9 µg/L 1.14 2.001-Methylnaphthalene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
77.6 µg/L 0.666 2.002-Methylnaphthalene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
74.5 µg/L 0.728 2.00Naphthalene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.905 µg/L 0.905 5.00Nitrobenzene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.493 µg/L 0.493 5.002-Nitrophenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.23 µg/L 1.23 10.04-Nitrophenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 25 of 41
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-159-0012
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Bo Cappleman
Charlotte
Received : 06/07/2023
ROS-001
Report Date : 06/15/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:TMW-1
97850 Matrix:
6/6/2023 12:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V34220 06/12/23 10:07
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 5.00N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.641 µg/L 0.641 5.00N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.43 µg/L 1.43 5.00Pentachlorophenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
3.47 µg/L 0.428 2.00Phenanthrene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.651 µg/L 0.651 5.00Phenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Pyrene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<2.21 µg/L 2.21 5.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
<1.32 µg/L 1.32 5.002,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 06/13/23 16:14 V34273AMP
625.1Surrogate: Phenol-d5 19.7 Limits: 10-63%06/13/23 16:141 AMP
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 60.8 Limits: 49-118%06/13/23 16:141 AMP V34273
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 31.4 Limits: 22-84%06/13/23 16:141 AMP V34273
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 59.0 Limits: 43-123%06/13/23 16:141 AMP V34273
Surrogate: 4-Terphenyl-d14 77.4 Limits: 49-151%06/13/23 16:141 AMP V34273
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 72.1 Limits: 31-144%06/13/23 16:141 AMP V34273
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Minimum valueMEstimated valueJ
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 26 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V34331QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V34330
Associated Lab Samples: 97848, 97849, 97850
LRB-V34330 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
06/13/23 14:3310.01.80<1.80µg/LAcetone
06/13/23 14:330.5000.180<0.180µg/LBenzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.210<0.210µg/LBromobenzene
06/13/23 14:331.000.420<0.420µg/LBromochloromethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.160<0.160µg/LBromodichloromethane
06/13/23 14:335.001.50<1.50µg/LBromoform
06/13/23 14:331.000.280<0.280µg/LBromomethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.180<0.180µg/Ln-Butylbenzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.200<0.200µg/Lsec-Butyl benzene
06/13/23 14:332.000.920<0.920µg/Ltert-Butyl benzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.180<0.180µg/LCarbon Tetrachloride
06/13/23 14:330.5000.190<0.190µg/LChlorobenzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.190<0.190µg/LChlorodibromomethane
06/13/23 14:331.000.430<0.430µg/LChloroethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.220<0.220µg/LChloroform
06/13/23 14:330.5000.220<0.220µg/LChloromethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.200<0.200µg/L2-Chlorotoluene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.200<0.200µg/L4-Chlorotoluene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.500<0.500µg/LDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)
06/13/23 14:332.001.10<1.10µg/L1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.200<0.200µg/L1,2-Dibromoethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.230<0.230µg/LDibromomethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.220<0.220µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.210<0.210µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene
06/13/23 14:335.001.20<1.20µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.240<0.240µg/L1,1-Dichloroethane
Page 1 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 27 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V34331QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V34330
Associated Lab Samples: 97848, 97849, 97850
LRB-V34330 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
06/13/23 14:330.5000.150<0.150µg/L1,2-Dichloroethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.150<0.150µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.200<0.200µg/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.180<0.180µg/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,2-Dichloropropane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.130<0.130µg/L1,3-Dichloropropane
06/13/23 14:332.000.210<0.210µg/L2,2-Dichloropropane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.200<0.200µg/L1,1-Dichloropropene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.210<0.210µg/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.150<0.150µg/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
06/13/23 14:3320042.0<42.0µg/LEthanol
06/13/23 14:330.5000.170<0.170µg/LEthylbenzene
06/13/23 14:333.000.350<0.350µg/LHexachlorobutadiene
06/13/23 14:331.000.380<0.380µg/L2-Hexanone
06/13/23 14:330.5000.180<0.180µg/LIsopropylbenzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.089<0.089µg/L4-Isopropyl toluene
06/13/23 14:335.000.710<0.710µg/LMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
06/13/23 14:331.000.140<0.140µg/LMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
06/13/23 14:331.000.078<0.078µg/L4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
06/13/23 14:332.000.330<0.330µg/LMethylene Chloride
06/13/23 14:331.000.470<0.470µg/LNaphthalene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.190<0.190µg/Ln-Propylbenzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.220<0.220µg/LStyrene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.220<0.220µg/LTetrachloroethene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.220<0.220µg/LToluene
Page 2 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 28 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V34331QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V34330
Associated Lab Samples: 97848, 97849, 97850
LRB-V34330 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
06/13/23 14:330.5000.380<0.380µg/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.310<0.310µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.096<0.096µg/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.180<0.180µg/LTrichloroethene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.180<0.180µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.270<0.270µg/L1,2,3-Trichloropropane
06/13/23 14:330.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
06/13/23 14:330.5000.180<0.180µg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
06/13/23 14:335.001.00<1.00µg/LVinyl Acetate
06/13/23 14:330.5000.170<0.170µg/LVinyl Chloride
06/13/23 14:330.5000.210<0.210µg/Lo-Xylene
06/13/23 14:331.000.420<0.420µg/Lm,p-Xylene
06/13/23 14:334-Bromofluorobenzene (S)102 70-130
06/13/23 14:33Dibromofluoromethane (S)99.6 70-130
06/13/23 14:331,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)102 70-130
06/13/23 14:33Toluene-d8 (S)99.8 70-130
LCS-V34330 LCSD-V34330Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
31.9 79.783.033.240.0µg/LAcetone 40-160 3.9 20.0
19.4 97.010420.820.0µg/LBenzene 70-130 6.9 20.0
19.8 99.010420.720.0µg/LBromobenzene 70-130 4.4 20.0
18.9 94.510220.420.0µg/LBromochloromethane 70-130 7.6 20.0
19.8 99.010220.320.0µg/LBromodichloromethane 70-130 2.4 20.0
Page 3 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 29 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V34331QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V34330
LCS-V34330 LCSD-V34330Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
20.6 10310320.620.0µg/LBromoform 70-130 0.0 20.0
17.4 87.082.516.520.0µg/LBromomethane 60-140 5.3 20.0
19.0 95.010220.320.0µg/Ln-Butylbenzene 70-130 6.6 20.0
18.3 91.597.519.520.0µg/Lsec-Butyl benzene 70-130 6.3 20.0
18.4 92.097.019.420.0µg/Ltert-Butyl benzene 70-130 5.2 20.0
19.2 96.010120.220.0µg/LCarbon Tetrachloride 70-130 5.0 20.0
19.1 95.510220.420.0µg/LChlorobenzene 70-130 6.5 20.0
20.0 10010721.320.0µg/LChlorodibromomethane 70-130 6.2 20.0
23.4 11712424.720.0µg/LChloroethane 60-140 5.4 20.0
19.8 99.010420.720.0µg/LChloroform 70-130 4.4 20.0
20.4 10210921.720.0µg/LChloromethane 60-140 6.1 20.0
19.2 96.010120.220.0µg/L2-Chlorotoluene 70-130 5.0 20.0
19.6 98.010320.620.0µg/L4-Chlorotoluene 70-130 4.9 20.0
20.7 10410821.520.0µg/LDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)70-130 3.7 20.0
21.4 10710521.020.0µg/L1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 70-130 1.8 20.0
20.9 10511022.020.0µg/L1,2-Dibromoethane 70-130 5.1 20.0
20.4 10210821.620.0µg/LDibromomethane 70-130 5.7 20.0
19.2 96.010220.320.0µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 5.5 20.0
19.0 95.010220.420.0µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 7.1 20.0
19.1 95.598.519.720.0µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 3.0 20.0
18.6 93.096.519.320.0µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane 60-140 3.6 20.0
20.0 10010721.320.0µg/L1,1-Dichloroethane 70-130 6.2 20.0
20.2 10110521.020.0µg/L1,2-Dichloroethane 70-130 3.8 20.0
19.4 97.010320.620.0µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene 70-130 6.0 20.0
19.2 96.010020.020.0µg/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130 4.0 20.0
19.6 98.010320.620.0µg/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130 4.9 20.0
Page 4 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 30 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V34331QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V34330
LCS-V34330 LCSD-V34330Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
20.4 10210721.320.0µg/L1,2-Dichloropropane 70-130 4.3 20.0
20.5 10310721.320.0µg/L1,3-Dichloropropane 70-130 3.8 20.0
19.7 98.510220.420.0µg/L2,2-Dichloropropane 70-130 3.4 20.0
19.6 98.010420.820.0µg/L1,1-Dichloropropene 70-130 5.9 20.0
20.9 10510721.320.0µg/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130 1.8 20.0
21.6 10811222.320.0µg/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130 3.1 20.0
598 120107536500µg/LEthanol 60-140 10.9 20.0
19.1 95.599.519.920.0µg/LEthylbenzene 70-130 4.1 20.0
18.8 94.098.019.620.0µg/LHexachlorobutadiene 70-130 4.1 20.0
20.9 10510521.020.0µg/L2-Hexanone 60-140 0.4 20.0
19.0 95.010220.320.0µg/LIsopropylbenzene 70-130 6.6 20.0
19.3 96.510320.520.0µg/L4-Isopropyl toluene 70-130 6.0 20.0
20.4 10210020.020.0µg/LMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)60-140 1.9 20.0
21.2 10611122.120.0µg/LMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)70-130 4.1 20.0
21.7 10910921.820.0µg/L4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 60-140 0.4 20.0
19.7 98.510721.420.0µg/LMethylene Chloride 70-130 8.2 20.0
21.7 10911122.220.0µg/LNaphthalene 70-130 2.2 20.0
18.7 93.599.019.820.0µg/Ln-Propylbenzene 70-130 5.7 20.0
19.8 99.010520.920.0µg/LStyrene 70-130 5.4 20.0
19.9 99.510721.420.0µg/L1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130 7.2 20.0
22.1 11111122.120.0µg/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130 0.0 20.0
18.6 93.010120.120.0µg/LTetrachloroethene 70-130 7.7 20.0
19.5 97.510420.720.0µg/LToluene 70-130 5.9 20.0
22.1 11112024.020.0µg/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 70-130 8.2 20.0
21.0 10510921.720.0µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70-130 3.2 20.0
18.6 93.098.519.720.0µg/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane 70-130 5.7 20.0
Page 5 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 31 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V34331QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V34330
LCS-V34330 LCSD-V34330Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
20.0 10010621.120.0µg/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane 70-130 5.3 20.0
18.5 92.510120.120.0µg/LTrichloroethene 70-130 8.2 20.0
21.4 10711122.220.0µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane 60-140 3.6 20.0
20.4 10210520.920.0µg/L1,2,3-Trichloropropane 70-130 2.4 20.0
19.1 95.510320.620.0µg/L1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 70-130 7.5 20.0
19.0 95.010220.320.0µg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 70-130 6.6 20.0
24.3 12212625.120.0µg/LVinyl Acetate 60-140 3.2 20.0
21.4 10711422.720.0µg/LVinyl Chloride 60-140 5.8 20.0
19.3 96.510220.320.0µg/Lo-Xylene 70-130 5.0 20.0
39.4 98.510742.740.0µg/Lm,p-Xylene 70-130 8.0 20.0
99.61004-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
98.096.8Dibromofluoromethane (S)70-130
1071041,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)70-130
99.299.4Toluene-d8 (S)70-130
Page 6 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 32 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V34362QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V34358
Associated Lab Samples: 97850
LRB-V34358 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
06/14/23 14:151.000.470<0.470µg/LNaphthalene
06/14/23 14:154-Bromofluorobenzene (S)102 70-130
06/14/23 14:15Dibromofluoromethane (S)100 70-130
06/14/23 14:151,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)103 70-130
06/14/23 14:15Toluene-d8 (S)99.4 70-130
LCS-V34358 LCSD-V34358Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
22.2 11110120.220.0µg/LNaphthalene 70-130 9.4 20.0
99.899.84-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
99.898.2Dibromofluoromethane (S)70-130
1051011,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)70-130
10099.4Toluene-d8 (S)70-130
Page 7 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 33 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V34273QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V34220
Associated Lab Samples: 97848, 97849, 97850
LRB-V34220 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
06/13/23 13:592.000.302<0.302µg/LAcenaphthene
06/13/23 13:592.000.297<0.297µg/LAcenaphthylene
06/13/23 13:592.000.836<0.836µg/LAnthracene
06/13/23 13:5910.01.32<1.32µg/LBenzidine
06/13/23 13:592.000.637<0.637µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene
06/13/23 13:592.001.02<1.02µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene
06/13/23 13:595.002.49<2.49µg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene
06/13/23 13:595.001.01<1.01µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
06/13/23 13:595.001.99<1.99µg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene
06/13/23 13:5910.01.10<1.10µg/LBenzoic Acid
06/13/23 13:595.000.684<0.684µg/LBenzyl alcohol
06/13/23 13:595.000.468<0.468µg/LBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
06/13/23 13:595.001.04<1.04µg/LBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
06/13/23 13:595.001.08<1.08µg/LBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
06/13/23 13:5910.03.46<3.46µg/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
06/13/23 13:595.001.11<1.11µg/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
06/13/23 13:595.001.83<1.83µg/LButyl benzyl phthalate
06/13/23 13:595.001.18<1.18µg/L4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
06/13/23 13:5920.07.38<7.38µg/L2-Chloronaphthalene
06/13/23 13:5910.00.938<0.938µg/L2-Chlorophenol
06/13/23 13:595.001.71<1.71µg/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
06/13/23 13:592.000.405<0.405µg/LChrysene
06/13/23 13:592.000.434<0.434µg/LDibenz(a,h)anthracene
06/13/23 13:595.000.856<0.856µg/LDibenzofuran
06/13/23 13:595.002.00<2.00µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene
06/13/23 13:595.002.00<2.00µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene
06/13/23 13:595.002.05<2.05µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Page 8 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 34 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V34273QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V34220
Associated Lab Samples: 97848, 97849, 97850
LRB-V34220 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
06/13/23 13:595.001.89<1.89µg/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
06/13/23 13:5910.01.46<1.46µg/L2,4-Dichlorophenol
06/13/23 13:595.000.745<0.745µg/LDiethyl phthalate
06/13/23 13:595.000.939<0.939µg/LDimethyl phthalate
06/13/23 13:5920.01.57<1.57µg/L2,4-Dimethylphenol
06/13/23 13:595.002.06<2.06µg/LDi-n-butyl phthalate
06/13/23 13:5910.02.07<2.07µg/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
06/13/23 13:5910.01.92<1.92µg/L2,4-Dinitrophenol
06/13/23 13:595.001.11<1.11µg/L2,4-Dinitrotoluene
06/13/23 13:595.000.809<0.809µg/L2,6-Dinitrotoluene
06/13/23 13:595.001.65<1.65µg/LDi-n-Octyl Phthalate
06/13/23 13:592.000.250<0.250µg/LFluoranthene
06/13/23 13:592.000.807<0.807µg/LFluorene
06/13/23 13:595.000.979<0.979µg/LHexachlorobenzene
06/13/23 13:595.002.73<2.73µg/LHexachlorobutadiene
06/13/23 13:595.002.05<2.05µg/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene
06/13/23 13:595.001.76<1.76µg/LHexachloroethane
06/13/23 13:592.000.477<0.477µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
06/13/23 13:595.000.444<0.444µg/LIsophorone
06/13/23 13:592.001.14<1.14µg/L1-Methylnaphthalene
06/13/23 13:592.000.666<0.666µg/L2-Methylnaphthalene
06/13/23 13:592.000.728<0.728µg/LNaphthalene
06/13/23 13:595.000.905<0.905µg/LNitrobenzene
06/13/23 13:595.000.493<0.493µg/L2-Nitrophenol
06/13/23 13:5910.01.23<1.23µg/L4-Nitrophenol
06/13/23 13:595.001.10<1.10µg/LN-Nitrosodiphenylamine
06/13/23 13:595.000.641<0.641µg/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
Page 9 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 35 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V34273QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V34220
Associated Lab Samples: 97848, 97849, 97850
LRB-V34220 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
06/13/23 13:595.001.43<1.43µg/LPentachlorophenol
06/13/23 13:592.000.428<0.428µg/LPhenanthrene
06/13/23 13:595.000.651<0.651µg/LPhenol
06/13/23 13:592.000.434<0.434µg/LPyrene
06/13/23 13:595.002.21<2.21µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
06/13/23 13:595.001.32<1.32µg/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
06/13/23 13:592-Fluorobiphenyl (S)68.6 49-118
06/13/23 13:592-Fluorophenol (S)34.4 22-84
06/13/23 13:59Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)68.4 43-123
06/13/23 13:594-Terphenyl-d14 (S)86.4 49-151
06/13/23 13:592,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)75.1 31-144
06/13/23 13:59Phenol-d5 (S)21.8 10-63
LCS-V34220 LCSD-V34220Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
31.5 63.066.433.250.0µg/LAcenaphthene 47-145 5.2 20.0
30.2 60.464.832.450.0µg/LAcenaphthylene 33-145 7.0 20.0
35.7 71.475.637.850.0µg/LAnthracene 27-133 5.7 20.0
1.74 3.4*4.7*2.3550.0µg/LBenzidine 15-150 29.8*20.0
35.5 71.074.237.150.0µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene 33-143 4.4 20.0
37.7 75.479.839.950.0µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene 17-163 5.6 20.0
36.3 72.679.439.750.0µg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene 24-159 8.9 20.0
32.9 65.869.434.750.0µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 10-219 5.3 20.0
37.4 74.873.836.950.0µg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene 11-162 1.3 20.0
9.92 19.828.014.050.0µg/LBenzoic Acid 10-125 34.1*20.0
Page 10 of 13* QC Fail Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 36 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V34273QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V34220
LCS-V34220 LCSD-V34220Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
26.6 53.253.226.650.0µg/LBenzyl alcohol 16-107 0.0 20.0
32.0 64.066.833.450.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 33-184 4.2 20.0
26.0 52.054.027.050.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 12-158 3.7 20.0
25.1 50.253.026.550.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 36-166 5.4 20.0
32.3 64.667.433.750.0µg/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 10-158 4.2 20.0
35.4 70.875.637.850.0µg/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 53-127 6.5 20.0
31.7 63.467.033.550.0µg/LButyl benzyl phthalate 10-152 5.5 20.0
33.3 66.667.833.950.0µg/L4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 22-147 1.7 20.0
29.5 59.0*62.431.250.0µg/L2-Chloronaphthalene 60-118 5.6 20.0
26.5 53.054.627.350.0µg/L2-Chlorophenol 23-134 2.9 20.0
37.3 74.676.638.350.0µg/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 25-158 2.6 20.0
38.6 77.273.036.550.0µg/LChrysene 17-168 5.5 20.0
69.5 13965.832.950.0µg/LDibenz(a,h)anthracene 10-227 71.4*20.0
32.5 65.067.833.950.0µg/LDibenzofuran 39-114 4.2 20.0
23.4 46.849.424.750.0µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 32-129 5.4 20.0
22.5 45.049.224.650.0µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 20-124 8.9 20.0
22.8 45.648.424.250.0µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 20-124 5.9 20.0
32.7 65.471.435.750.0µg/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 10-262 8.7 20.0
32.5 65.068.634.350.0µg/L2,4-Dichlorophenol 39-135 5.3 20.0
35.6 71.272.436.250.0µg/LDiethyl phthalate 10-114 1.6 20.0
34.6 69.272.836.450.0µg/LDimethyl phthalate 10-112 5.0 20.0
42.9 85.887.643.850.0µg/L2,4-Dimethylphenol 32-119 2.0 20.0
36.6 73.276.838.450.0µg/LDi-n-butyl phthalate 10-118 4.8 20.0
35.8 71.676.438.250.0µg/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 10-181 6.4 20.0
32.8 65.676.238.150.0µg/L2,4-Dinitrophenol 10-191 14.9 20.0
35.4 70.873.636.850.0µg/L2,4-Dinitrotoluene 39-139 3.8 20.0
Page 11 of 13* QC Fail Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 37 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V34273QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V34220
LCS-V34220 LCSD-V34220Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
33.8 67.670.635.350.0µg/L2,6-Dinitrotoluene 50-158 4.3 20.0
35.2 70.474.837.450.0µg/LDi-n-Octyl Phthalate 10-146 6.0 20.0
33.1 66.271.035.550.0µg/LFluoranthene 26-137 6.9 20.0
34.4 68.870.635.350.0µg/LFluorene 59-121 2.5 20.0
34.9 69.872.836.450.0µg/LHexachlorobenzene 10-152 4.2 20.0
26.8 53.655.827.950.0µg/LHexachlorobutadiene 24-116 4.0 20.0
22.6 45.247.823.950.0µg/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene 32-117 5.5 20.0
20.6 41.244.622.350.0µg/LHexachloroethane 40-113 7.9 20.0
33.1 66.272.236.150.0µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 10-171 8.6 20.0
27.6 55.258.629.350.0µg/LIsophorone 21-196 5.9 20.0
26.8 53.657.828.950.0µg/L1-Methylnaphthalene 40-135 7.5 20.0
27.4 54.858.829.450.0µg/L2-Methylnaphthalene 18-121 7.0 20.0
26.7 53.457.828.950.0µg/LNaphthalene 21-133 7.9 20.0
27.5 55.058.429.250.0µg/LNitrobenzene 35-180 5.9 20.0
30.7 61.463.231.650.0µg/L2-Nitrophenol 29-182 2.8 20.0
7.45 14.914.07.0050.0µg/L4-Nitrophenol 10-132 6.2 20.0
40.8 81.688.044.050.0µg/LN-Nitrosodiphenylamine 69-152 7.5 20.0
27.0 54.055.827.950.0µg/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 10-230 3.2 20.0
37.5 75.078.839.450.0µg/LPentachlorophenol 14-176 4.9 20.0
33.9 67.872.236.150.0µg/LPhenanthrene 54-120 6.2 20.0
12.5 25.025.012.550.0µg/LPhenol 10-112 0.0 20.0
34.6 69.273.436.750.0µg/LPyrene 52-115 5.8 20.0
26.0 52.057.228.650.0µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 44-142 9.5 20.0
29.8 59.662.431.250.0µg/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 37-144 4.5 20.0
60.264.42-Fluorobiphenyl (S)49-118
30.531.12-Fluorophenol (S)22-84
Page 12 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 38 of 41
Quality Control Data
23-159-0012Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ROS-001
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V34273QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V34220
LCS-V34220 LCSD-V34220Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
57.862.2Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)43-123
76.680.24-Terphenyl-d14 (S)49-151
68.572.82,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)31-144
18.618.9Phenol-d5 (S)10-63
Page 13 of 13Date:06/15/2023 12:50 PM
Page 39 of 41
Fed Ex
UPS
US Postal
Client
Lab
Courier
Other :
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number:
Customer Name:
Report Number:23-159-0012
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
01102
Shipping Method
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
Thermometer ID:IRT15 2.0C
Chain of Custody (COC) present?Yes No
Yes No Not Present
Yes No Not Present
Yes No
COC agrees with sample label(s)? Yes No
COC properly completed
Samples in proper containers?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
All samples received within holding time?
Cooler temperature in compliance?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes NoCooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
Yes No
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/ASoil VOA method 5035 – compliance criteria met
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
Water - VOA vials free of headspace Yes No N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
High concentration pre-weighed (methanol -14 d) Low conc pre-weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
High concentration container (48 hr)
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Number of coolers/boxes received
Yes No
1
Signature:Angelo Norvell Date & Time:06/08/2023 10:47:40
Special precautions or instructions included?
Comments:
Page 40 of 41
Page 41 of 41

Appendix B
Slug Test Data
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)Normalized Head (ft/ft)WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: S:\...\MW-2_Iteration 1_REAL TIME.aqt
Date: 07/19/23 Time: 19:41:29
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Hart & Hickman
Client: Dietz Holdings, LLC
Project: ROS-001
Location: Hickory, NC
Test Well: MW-2
Test Date: 6/6/2023
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 42.07 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.5
WELL DATA (MW-2)
Initial Displacement: 1.771 ft Static Water Column Height: 10.57 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 15. ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.34 ft
Gravel Pack Porosity: 0.3
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 0.9577 ft/day y0 = 0.3358 ft
0. 2. 4. 6. 8. 10.
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)Normalized Head (ft/ft)WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: S:\...\MW-2_Iteration 2_REAL TIME.aqt
Date: 07/19/23 Time: 19:42:46
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Hart & Hickman
Client: Dietz Holdings, LLC
Project: ROS-001
Location: Hickory, NC
Test Well: MW-2
Test Date: 6/6/2023
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 42.06 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.5
WELL DATA (MW-2)
Initial Displacement: 2.392 ft Static Water Column Height: 10.56 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 15. ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.34 ft
Gravel Pack Porosity: 0.3
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 1.233 ft/day y0 = 0.3703 ft
0. 1.6 3.2 4.8 6.4 8.
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)Normalized Head (ft/ft)WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: S:\...\MW-2_Iteration 3_REAL TIME.aqt
Date: 07/19/23 Time: 19:44:01
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Hart & Hickman
Client: Dietz Holdings, LLC
Project: ROS-001
Location: Hickory, NC
Test Well: MW-2
Test Date: 6/6/2023
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 42.05 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.5
WELL DATA (MW-2)
Initial Displacement: 1.796 ft Static Water Column Height: 10.55 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 15. ft Screen Length: 15. ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.34 ft
Gravel Pack Porosity: 0.3
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 1.206 ft/day y0 = 0.4121 ft
0. 1.6 3.2 4.8 6.4 8.
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)Normalized Head (ft/ft)WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: S:\...\MW-3_Iteration 1_REAL TIME.aqt
Date: 07/19/23 Time: 19:44:26
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Hart & Hickman
Client: Dietz Holdings, LLC
Project: ROS-001
Location: Hickory, NC
Test Well: MW-3
Test Date: 6/6/2023
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 41.38 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.5
WELL DATA (MW-3)
Initial Displacement: 4.229 ft Static Water Column Height: 9.88 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 9.88 ft Screen Length: 9.88 ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.34 ft
Gravel Pack Porosity: 0.3
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 0.9835 ft/day y0 = 0.5109 ft
0. 1.6 3.2 4.8 6.4 8.
0.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)Normalized Head (ft/ft)WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: S:\...\MW-3_Iteration 3_REAL TIME.aqt
Date: 07/19/23 Time: 19:44:46
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Hart & Hickman
Client: Dietz Holdings, LLC
Project: ROS-001
Location: Hickory, NC
Test Well: MW-3
Test Date: 6/6/2023
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 41.39 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.5
WELL DATA (MW-3)
Initial Displacement: 5.288 ft Static Water Column Height: 9.89 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 9.89 ft Screen Length: 9.89 ft
Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.34 ft
Gravel Pack Porosity: 0.3
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 1.043 ft/day y0 = 0.5398 ft

Appendix C
Groundwater Model Output Sheets
BIOSCREEN Natural Attenuation Decision Support SystemFormer Dietz TruckingData Input Instructions:Air Force Center for Environmental ExcellenceVersion 1.4Naphthalene - Calibration1151. Enter value directly....orRun Name2. Calculate by filling in grey1. HYDROGEOLOGY5. GENERAL0.02cells below. (To restoreSeepage Velocity*Vs64.7(ft/yr)Modeled Area Length* 30(ft)formulas, hit button below).orModeled Area Width* 32(ft)Variable* Data used directly in model. Hydraulic ConductivityK3.9E-04(cm/sec)Simulation Time*13(yr)20 Value calculated by model.Hydraulic Gradienti0.03225(ft/ft) (Don't enter any data).Porosityn0.2(-)6.SOURCE DATASource Thickness in Sat.Zone* 10(ft)2. DISPERSIONSource Zones:Longitudinal Dispersivity*alpha x6.5(ft)Width* (ft) Conc. (mg/L)*Transverse Dispersivity*alpha y0.2(ft)1Vertical Dispersivity*alpha z0.0(ft)5 0.006or50.39Estimated Plume LengthLp90(ft)5 0.006003. ADSORPTIONSource Halflife (see Help):Retardation Factor*R1.7(-)20 20(yr)View of Plume Looking DownorInst. React. 1st OrderSoil Bulk Densityrho1.5(kg/l)Soluble Mass0.205(Kg) Observed Centerline Concentrations at Monitoring Wells Partition CoefficientKoc933(L/kg)In Source NAPL, SoilIf No Data Leave Blank or Enter "0"FractionOrganicCarbonfoc1.0E-4(-)7.FIELD DATA FOR COMPARISONConcentration (mg/L).248BDL4.BIODEGRADATIONDist. from Source (ft)0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 301st Order Decay Coeff*lambda3.5E+0(per yr)Source (TMW-1) MW-2or68. CHOOSE TYPE OF OUTPUT TO SEE:Solute Half-Lifet-half0.20(year)or Instantaneous Reaction ModelDelta Oxygen*DO(mg/L)Delta Nitrate*NO3(mg/L)Observed Ferrous Iron*Fe2+(mg/L)Delta Sulfate*SO4(mg/L)Observed Methane*CH4(mg/L)Vertical Plane Source: Look at Plume Cross-Section and Input Concentrations & Widthsfor Zones 1, 2, and 3View OutputPaste Example DatasetView OutputRestore Formulas for Vs, RUN CENTERLINE RUN ARRAYHelpRecalculate LWorororor12345oror
TransverseDISSOLVED HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATIONS IN PLUME (mg/L at Z=0)Distance Source (TMW-1)Distance from Source (ft)MW-2Model to Display:03691215182124273016 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.0008 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.00200.2440.198 0.150 0.113 0.086 0.0660.051 0.040 0.031 0.025 0.020-8 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002-16 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0000.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000MASS2.0E+1 1.6E+1 1.2E+1 9.2E+0 7.1E+0 5.6E+0 4.5E+0 3.6E+0 2.9E+0 2.4E+0 1.9E+0FLUX(mg/day)Time:13 YearsTarget Level: 0.006 mg/L Displayed Model: 1st Order DecayPlume and Source Masses (Order-of-Magnitude Accuracy)Plume Mass if No BiodegradationCan't Calc.(Kg)- Actual Plume MassCan't Calc.(Kg)= Plume Mass Removed by Biodeg - (Kg) Change in Electron Acceptor/Byproduct Masses:Oxygen Nitrate Iron II Sulfate Methanena na na na na(Kg)Contam. Mass in Source (t=0 Years) 0.2(Kg)Contam. Mass in Source Now (t=13Years) 0.1(Kg) Current Volume of Groundwater in Plume Can't Calc.(ac-ft) Flowrate of Water Through Source Zone Can't Calc.(ac-ft/yr)160-160.0000.0500.1000.1500.2000.2500369121518212427(ft)Concentration (mg/L)(ft)Recalculate No Degradation 1st Order Decay ModelInstantaneous Plot All DataPlot Data > TargetMass HELP
BIOSCREEN Natural Attenuation Decision Support SystemFormer Dietz TruckingData Input Instructions:Air Force Center for Environmental ExcellenceVersion 1.4Naphthalene - Model1151. Enter value directly....orRun Name2. Calculate by filling in grey1. HYDROGEOLOGY5. GENERAL0.02cells below. (To restoreSeepage Velocity*Vs64.7(ft/yr)Modeled Area Length* 81(ft)formulas, hit button below).orModeled Area Width* 32(ft)Variable* Data used directly in model. Hydraulic ConductivityK3.9E-04(cm/sec)Simulation Time*13(yr)20 Value calculated by model.Hydraulic Gradienti0.03225(ft/ft) (Don't enter any data).Porosityn0.2(-)6.SOURCE DATASource Thickness in Sat.Zone* 10(ft)2. DISPERSIONSource Zones:Longitudinal Dispersivity*alpha x6.5(ft)Width* (ft) Conc. (mg/L)*Transverse Dispersivity*alpha y0.2(ft)1Vertical Dispersivity*alpha z0.0(ft)5 0.006or50.39Estimated Plume LengthLp90(ft)5 0.006003. ADSORPTIONSource Halflife (see Help):Retardation Factor*R1.7(-)20 20(yr)View of Plume Looking DownorInst. React. 1st OrderSoil Bulk Densityrho1.5(kg/l)Soluble Mass0.205(Kg) Observed Centerline Concentrations at Monitoring Wells Partition CoefficientKoc933(L/kg)In Source NAPL, SoilIf No Data Leave Blank or Enter "0"FractionOrganicCarbonfoc1.0E-4(-)7.FIELD DATA FOR COMPARISONConcentration (mg/L).2484.BIODEGRADATIONDist. from Source (ft)0 8 16 24 32 41 49 57 65 73 811st Order Decay Coeff*lambda3.5E+0(per yr)Source (TMW-1) Maxor68. CHOOSE TYPE OF OUTPUT TO SEE:Solute Half-Lifet-half0.20(year)or Instantaneous Reaction ModelDelta Oxygen*DO(mg/L)Delta Nitrate*NO3(mg/L)Observed Ferrous Iron*Fe2+(mg/L)Delta Sulfate*SO4(mg/L)Observed Methane*CH4(mg/L)Vertical Plane Source: Look at Plume Cross-Section and Input Concentrations & Widthsfor Zones 1, 2, and 3View OutputPaste Example DatasetView OutputRestore Formulas for Vs, RUN CENTERLINE RUN ARRAYHelpRecalculate LWorororor12345oror
DISSOLVED HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L at Z=0)Source (TMW-1)Distance from Source (ft)2L Standard Max Dis.TYPE OF MODEL0 8 16 24 32 41 49 57 65 73 81No Degradation0.244 0.206 0.169 0.146 0.131 0.120 0.112 0.105 0.100 0.095 0.0921st Order Decay0.2440.123 0.060 0.031 0.016 0.0090.0050.003 0.002 0.0010.001Inst. Reaction0.244 0.206 0.169 0.146 0.131 0.120 0.112 0.105 0.100 0.095 0.092Field Data from Site0.248Time:13 YearsNext TimestepPrev TimestepCalculateAnimationRecalculate This 0.0000.0500.1000.1500.2000.2500.3000 163248648096Concentration(mg/L)Distance From Source (ft)1st Order DecayInstantaneous ReactionNo DegradationField Data from SiteReturn to
DISSOLVED HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L at Z=0)Source (TMW-1)Distance from Source (ft)2L Standard Max Dis.TYPE OF MODEL0 8 16 23 31 39 47 55 62 70 78No Degradation0.204 0.174 0.143 0.124 0.111 0.102 0.095 0.089 0.085 0.081 0.0781st Order Decay0.2040.106 0.052 0.028 0.015 0.0080.0050.003 0.002 0.0010.001Inst. Reaction0.204 0.174 0.143 0.124 0.111 0.102 0.095 0.089 0.085 0.081 0.078Field Data from Site0.248Time:18 YearsNext TimestepPrev TimestepCalculateAnimationRecalculate This 0.0000.0500.1000.1500.2000.2500.3000 163248648096Concentration(mg/L)Distance From Source (ft)1st Order DecayInstantaneous ReactionNo DegradationField Data from SiteReturn to

Appendix D
GSI Mann-Kendall Spreadsheet and Linear Regression Graph
Evaluation Date:Job ID:
Facility Name:Constituent:
Conducted By:Concentration Units:µg/L
Sampling Point ID:TMW-1 (602/6200) TMW-1 (625)
Sampling SamplingEventDate
1 10/27/10 161
2 08/04/11 78
3 12/03/12 260 85
4 02/25/14 106 112
5 08/12/15 190 140
6 10/25/16 190 98
7 10/20/17 390 180
8 06/06/23 248 74.5
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Coefficient of Variation:0.41 0.34
Mann-Kendall Statistic (S):4 0Confidence Factor:70.3%45.2%
Concentration Trend:No Trend Stable
Notes:
1.At least four independent sampling events per well are required for calculating the trend. Methodology is valid for 4 to 40 samples.
2.Confidence in Trend = Confidence (in percent) that constituent concentration is increasing (S>0) or decreasing (S<0): >95% = Increasing or Decreasing;
≥ 90% = Probably Increasing or Probably Decreasing; < 90% and S>0 = No Trend; < 90%, S≤0, and COV ≥ 1 = No Trend; < 90% and COV < 1 = Stable.
3.Methodology based on "MAROS: A Decision Support System for Optimizing Monitoring Plans", J.J. Aziz, M. Ling, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, and J.R. Gonzales,
Ground Water, 41(3):355-367, 2003.
DISCLAIMER: The GSI Mann-Kendall Toolkit is available "as is". Considerable care has been exercised in preparing this software product; however, no party, including without
limitation GSI Environmental Inc., makes any representation or warranty regarding the accuracy, correctness, or completeness of the information contained herein, and no such
party shall be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, incidental or other damages resulting from the use of this product or the information contained herein. Information in
this publication is subject to change without notice. GSI Environmental Inc., disclaims any responsibility or obligation to update the information contained herein.
GSI Environmental Inc., www.gsi-net.com
NAPHTHALENE CONCENTRATION (µg/L)
8-Aug-23
Former Dietz Trucking Terminal Naphthalene
GSI MANN-KENDALL TOOLKIT
for Constituent Trend Analysis
SRL
ROS.001
1
10
100
1000
07/09 04/12 12/14 09/17 06/20 03/23 12/25Concentration (µg/L)Sampling Date
TMW-1 (602/6200)
TMW-1 (625)
y = 390.31e‐0.081x11010010000.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0Naphthalene Conc. (ug/L)Time (~years since Oct. 2017)TMW‐1 ‐Naphthalene Concentrations vs. Time Rate Constant (kpoint)Naphthalene Conc.2L Standard (6 ug/L)Remediation Goal (~51.5 years)