AS-3132_28327_CA_MRP_20220302

March 2, 2022
Mr. Dan Murphy North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank Section 2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 RE: ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089 (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) 3045 TYNECASTLE HIGHWAY BANNER ELK, AVERY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA UST INCIDENT NO.: 28327 Dear Mr. Murphy:

On behalf of GPM Southeast, LLC, CES of NC, PLLC is providing the enclosed Groundwater Monitoring
Report for the above referenced site. If you have any questions, please contact us at (540)-343-6256.

Sincerely,
CES of NC, PLLC

Daniel Fisher, PMP Allison E. Streams
Director of Mid-Atlantic Operations Project Manager

CC: Mr. Rolfe Lann, GPM Southeast, LLC

GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089-D (Former Scotchman #89)

ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
DECEMBER 2021

GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN NO. 89) 3045 TYNECASTLE HIGHWAY BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA UST INCIDENT NO.: 28327
CES OF NC, PLLC PROJECT NUMBER: 9.0656 MARCH 2, 2022
PREPARED BY: CES OF NC, PLLC 5104 Reagan Drive, Suite 7 Charlotte, NC 28206 Phone: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
PREPARED FOR: GPM SOUTHEAST, LLC Mr. Rolfe Lann Director of Environmental 8565 Magellan Parkway, Suite 400 Richmond, Virginia 23227
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Mr. Dan Murphy Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank Section
Corrective Action Branch 2090 US 70 Highway Swannanoa, North Carolina 28788
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT i
ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT

SITE INFORMATION

Site Identification Date of Report: March 2, 2022 Site Name: GPM 3089-D (Former Scotchman #89)
3045 Tynecastle Highway Banner Elk, Avery County, North Carolina Facility I.D.: 24878 UST Incident Number: 28327 Risk Rank: High (H375D) Latitude: 36.134278 Longitude: -81.848694 Source: UST Database Site Contact Information UST Owner and Operator: GPM Southeast, LLC
8565 Magellan Parkway, Suite 400 Richmond, Virginia 23227 [phone] Property Property Owner: Norwood Family Limited Partnership Occupant: Sugar Creek Gem Mine 4370 Woodbourne Drive 3045 Tynecastle Highway Clemmons, NC 27012 Banner Elk, North Carolina Consultant: CES of NC, PLLC State 5104 Reagan Drive, Suite 7 Certification No. C-550 Charlotte, NC 28206 [phone]

Analytical State Laboratory: Pace Analytical Certification No. 37706 Address: 106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone]
Release Information Date Discovered: 6/20/2005 Estimated Quantity of Release: Undetermined Cause of Release: UST systems and surface spill Source of Release: Former gasoline UST systems UST Information: Formerly three gasoline, one
diesel, and one kerosene USTs
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As required, the following executive summary provides the most pertinent information for this assessment.
For additions information please refer to subsequent sections of this report.
• CES of NC, PLLC (CES) was retained by GPM Southeast, LLC (GPM) to complete a groundwater monitoring event in December 2021. The activities were requested in a “Notice of Regulatory Requirements” dated March 1, 2021, issued by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). The services were provided in general accordance with the NCDEQ “Guidelines for Assessment and Corrective Action for UST Releases” and approved task authorization 28327-31.
• Historical site assessments include a Limited Site Assessment (LSA), Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA), and multiple groundwater monitoring events. Most recently, a monitoring
event completed in January 2021 indicated groundwater contamination in excess of groundwater quality standards in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3R.
• Soil and groundwater contamination at the site has been adequately delineated but multiple receptors are present within 1,500-feet of the source of the release. Impact to receptors has not been identified to date.
• CES personnel mobilized to the site on December 23, 2021, for completion of a limited groundwater monitoring event. Monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3R, MW-5 and MW-6 were gauged and sampled for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) including ethanol and oxygenates by Standard Methods 6200B and for Lead using Method 6010B. Water supply wells WSW-3 and WSW-4 were also sampled.
• Groundwater samples collected from site monitoring wells indicated groundwater impacts in excess of groundwater quality standards, however no detections were reported above GCLs. Free
product was not encountered in site monitoring wells. Groundwater samples collected from the water supply wells indicated no contaminant impacts above groundwater quality standards.
• Shallow groundwater flow direction was interpreted to trend overall to the north-west.
• In conclusion, CES recommends the incident be considered for restrictive closure under a Notice of Residual Petroleum with appropriate land use restrictions.

GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Site Information ............................................................................................................................................. i
Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................... iv List of Appendices ....................................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Site History and Characterization ................................................................................................. 1 2.1 UST System Information ................................................................................................................. 1 2.2 Past Releases .................................................................................................................................... 1 2.3 Description of Release, Initial Abatement, and Historical Assessment ........................................... 1 2.4 Subject Site and Surrounding Property Use ..................................................................................... 2 2.5 Regional Geology and Site Hydrology ............................................................................................ 2
3.0 Receptor Information ........................................................................................................................ 2 3.1 Water Supply Wells ......................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Public Water Supplies ...................................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Surface Water .................................................................................................................................. 3 3.4 Wellhead Protection Area ................................................................................................................ 3 3.5 Subsurface Structures....................................................................................................................... 3
3.6 Deep Aquifers in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province ........................................................... 3 3.7 Property Owners and Occupants ...................................................................................................... 3 3.8 Sensitive Land Use Features ............................................................................................................ 4 4.0 Recent Activities ............................................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Water Sampling Event ..................................................................................................................... 4 4.2 Groundwater Occurrence and Flow Direction ................................................................................. 4 4.3 Laboratory Results ........................................................................................................................... 5 4.4 Estimated Extent of Contamination ................................................................................................. 5 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................. 6 5.1 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 6 5.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 7 6.0 Statements and Certification ............................................................................................................. 8 7.0 Remarks ............................................................................................................................................ 9 8.0 References ......................................................................................................................................... 9
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Site Vicinity Map Figure 4 WSWs Within 1,500 ft Radius Map Figure 5 Soil Analytical Results Map
Figure 6 Potentiometric Map (12/23/2021) Figure 7 Groundwater Analytical Results Map (12/23/2021) Figure 8 NCAC 2L Exceedances Map (12/23/2021) Figure 9 Cross Section A-A’
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 UST System and Other Release Information
Table 2 Site History – UST Owner / Operator Table 3 Summary of Soil Analytical Results Table 4 Adjacent Property Owners/Occupants Table 5 Sampled Water Supply Well Information Table 6 Additional Water Supply Well Information Table 7 Sensitive Land Use Features Table 8 Groundwater Elevation Data Table 9 Groundwater Analytical Data LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Recent Correspondence Appendix B Groundwater Sampling Logs Appendix C Laboratory Report(s) and Chain of Custody Documentation Appendix D Hydrograph
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to provide the details of groundwater monitoring activities associated
with a release from the underground storage tank (UST) system at the GPM 3089 facility, also known as former Scotchman #89) located at 3045 Tynecastle Highway, in Banner Elk, North Carolina (site). A topographic map illustrating the site location is included as Figure 1. A release was reported to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) in 2005 following the removal of the UST System. In correspondence dated March 1, 2021, the NCDEQ directed the responsible party, GPM Southeast, LLC (GPM), to proceed with annual groundwater monitoring activities. GPM retained CES of NC, PLLC (CES) for environmental consulting services. The activities were provided in general accordance with the NCDEQ UST Section “Assessment Guidelines” and “Corrective Action Guidelines”.
2.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION
Historically the site was owned and operated by Worsley Companies, Inc. as a retail service station from 1983 until 2005. Worsley operated five (5) underground storage tanks (USTs). The history of the former UST systems is summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The property is now owned by the Norwood Family Limited Partnership and currently operates as Sugar Creek Gem Mine. As required, the following provides information relevant to site history and characterization.
2.1 UST SYSTEM INFORMATION The UST system consisted of five (5) single wall steel tanks including: three (3) 6,000-gallon gasoline USTs, one (1) 4,000-gallon kerosene UST, and one (1) 4,000-gallon diesel UST that were installed in April 1983 and closed by removal in June 2005. The tank pit was located to the west of the building near the
northern edge of the property boundary as shown on Figure 2.
2.2 PAST RELEASES No record of previous releases was found in the NCDEQ UST incident management database.
2.3 DESCRIPTION OF RELEASE, INITIAL ABATEMENT, AND HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT
Detailed site history has been provided in previous reports submitted to the NCDEQ. During UST closure assessment activities in June 2005, it was determined that a gasoline release had occurred. Consequently, the NCDEQ requested that a Phase I LSA be performed for the site. LSA activities were initiated by
Geological Resources, Inc. (GRI) of Charlotte, North Carolina, on July 11, 2007, with the installation of one source area monitoring well (MW-1). The LSA indicated the presence of petroleum compounds above the North Carolina groundwater quality standards as defined in North Carolina Administrative Code Title 15A Chapter 2L .0202 (2L Standards). On February 18, 2008, Best Geologic and Environmental Consulting, P.A. (Best) advanced five (5) soil probes (P1 through P5) to define the extent of impacted soil. Historical soil sample data is summarized on Table 3 and Figure 4. Best installed four (4) new 2-inch diameter Type II monitoring wells (MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5) on March 13 and 14, 2008, to complete the horizontal delineation of the petroleum compounds in groundwater. One (1) Type III groundwater monitoring well (MW-1D) was installed to determine the vertical extent of impacted groundwater. One (1) additional monitoring well (MW-6) was
installed by Best on June 5, 2008, to further define the extent of impacted groundwater. Laboratory analyses of the groundwater sample collected from MW-6 indicated that the horizontal delineation of groundwater impact had been completed. On June 16, 2010, Best installed a 2-inch Type II monitoring well (MW-3R)
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 2
to replace MW-3, which was damaged beyond repair during parking lot improvement activities. In addition to the installation of MW-3R, the manways for monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-5 were replaced. A total of seven (7) groundwater monitoring wells have been installed at the site to assess the release. Multiple groundwater monitoring events have been conducted since 2007. Most recently, CES personnel performed a groundwater monitoring event in December 2021. Groundwater samples collected from site
monitoring wells indicated groundwater impacts in excess of groundwater quality standards, however no detections were reported above GCLs. Free product was not encountered in site monitoring wells. Groundwater samples collected from the water supply wells and surface water indicated no contaminant impacts above groundwater quality standards.
2.4 SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY USE
Site and adjacent property owners/occupants are summarized in Table 4. The subject site is zoned for highway business. Land use for the surrounding area is primarily commercial along Tynecastle Highway. The majority of the land to the north and east is single-family residential. The land to the west across
Tynecastle Highway is part of the Sugar Mountain ski area. The nearest residence is a single-family dwelling located approximately 160 feet east of the source area. The nearest public gathering place is the Banner Elk Church of Christ located 550 feet west of the source area.
2.5 REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND SITE HYDROLOGY As reported by previous consultants, the subject site is located along the northern margin of the Grandfather Mountain Window in the Blue Ridge Tectonic province. The site is underlain by Grandfather Mountain Formation. The site is located immediately south of a perennial stream near its confluence with the Elk River. The site is subject to flooding and was severely impacted in 2004 when the remnants of a hurricane passed through the area. The source area is covered by asphalt pavement and slopes from east to west. The grade of the site appears to have been raised by the placement of fill material. Fill material described as poorly sorted boulders, cobbles, gravel, wood within a matrix of clayey sandy silt was encountered from the ground surface to
depths ranging from eight to 15 feet below the ground surface. Beneath the fill material, alluvial soils consisting of cobbles, gravel and sandy silt were encountered. Partially weathered rock was encountered at a depth of 28 feet and competent rock was encountered at a depth of 40 feet during the drilling of vertical
extent well MW-1D. The groundwater flow appears to be influenced by the poorly sorted fill material and the proximity to the
stream. The hydraulic gradient at the source area was estimated at 0.093 feet per foot, while the hydraulic gradient on the western part of the site was 0.125 feet per foot (as reported in the August 18, 2008, CSA). On March 14, 2008, slug tests were performed on wells MW-2 and MW-4 to estimate the hydraulic conductivity (K) of the regolith aquifer. Prior to the start of the test, the static water level of each well was measured. A slug of water was removed using a new disposable bailer. The recovery of the well water over time was recorded. The estimated hydraulic conductivity and the hydraulic gradient were used to estimate an average linear groundwater velocity of 4.92 feet per year at the source area and 60.23 feet per foot on the western part of the site. 3.0 RECEPTOR INFORMATION
CES evaluated receptors based on historically available information and current site conditions as discussed below. A receptor survey was originally performed during the CSA activities and updated during subsequent site visits.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 3
3.1 WATER SUPPLY WELLS As part of the CSA Report dated August 18, 2008, Best updated the receptor survey by walking the area within 500 feet of the subject site to identify any water supply wells. In addition, Best mailed a Water Supply Well Survey to each property owner within 500 feet of the source area. Thirty-one (31) water supply wells have been identified within 1,500 feet of the source area, and 21 water supply wells have been identified within 1,000 feet of the source area. Two (2) water wells have been identified within 250 feet of
the source area. These wells are used as sources of potable water but are situated up gradient of the source area. The locations of the identified water supply wells are shown on Figure 4. The owner information for the sampled wells WSW-1, WSW-3, and WSW-4 is included in Table 5 with the additional water supply well information included in Table 6.
3.2 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES
Carolina Water of North Carolina (Carolina Water) provides potable water to the subject site and the area west and northwest of the subject site. Water service is not available east of the subject site or south along Tynecastle Highway. Carolina Water obtains water from 23 fractured bedrock wells. Carolina Water
operates a community well on behalf of the Ski Country development. This well is located 785 feet northwest of the source area.

3.3 SURFACE WATER CES reviewed a United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Topographic Map (Figure 1) to identify possible surface water bodies in the vicinity of the site. Two (2) surface water bodies are present within 500 feet of the source area. The nearest surface water body is an unnamed tributary of the Elk River located approximately 25 feet north of the source area. A pond is located 150 feet northeast of the source area. The Elk River is classified as B and C waters and designated as public trout waters.
3.4 WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA According to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality Wellhead Protection website, the source area is not located within a designated wellhead protection area as defined in 42 USC 300h-7(e) and is not located in the Coastal Plain physiographic region.

3.5 SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES An underground natural gas line is present immediately north and northwest of the source area. A storm
water culvert is situated 60 feet west of the source area. It does not appear that these structures have influenced contaminant migration.
3.6 DEEP AQUIFERS IN THE COASTAL PLAIN PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCE The risk classification criteria specified in Title 15A of the NCAC, Subchapter 2L, Section .01159(d) requires an evaluation for the presence of unconfined or semi-confined deep aquifers in the Coastal Plain region of North Carolina which may be used as a source of drinking water. According to the September 29, 2015 “Physiographic Provinces of NC” map, the site is not located within the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province.
3.7 PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS Twenty-four (24) contiguous properties are abutting the site. The information on these properties is presented in Table 4 and keyed to Figure 3.

GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 4
3.8 SENSITIVE LAND USE FEATURES Sensitive land use features are defined by the NCDEQ as schools, daycare centers, nursing homes, hospitals, playgrounds, parks and recreational areas, churches, camps, and other places of public assembly. Based on the available information there are only two (2) features that qualify under the definition of sensitive land use features summarized in Table 7 and keyed to Figure 3:
• Banner Elk Church of Christ, approximately 550-ft west
• Life Care Center of Banner Elk, approximately 1,050-ft west
4.0 RECENT ACTIVITIES
CES performed a groundwater monitoring event in accordance with the NCDEQ approved pre-approval task authorization (PATA) 28327-31. A copy of the approved PATA form is included in Appendix A.
4.1 WATER SAMPLING EVENT On December 23, 2021, CES collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-
3R, MW-5 and MW-6, and from water supply wells WSW-3 and WSW-4. Please note that monitoring well MW-4 appears to have been destroyed and MW-1D was not located. WSW-1 was not sampled in December 2021 because the homeowner was not home, and the spigot is located inside the house. The monitoring wells were located, accessed, and gauged for static depth to water and total well depth using an electronic oil-water interface probe after allowing the water levels in the wells time to equilibrate at atmospheric pressure. At this time, free product was not detected in the gauged monitoring wells. A summary of well construction and recent gauging data is included in Table 8. Following gauging, each monitoring well was purged of at least three (3) well volumes, or until dry, using dedicated disposable bailers. The bailer was gently lowered into the water column of the well and allowed
to fill, then raised to the surface and evacuated. This process was repeated until the necessary volume of water had been removed from the well. Groundwater sampling logs indicating purge volumes, sample times, and physical parameters recorded at the time of sampling by a calibrated groundwater quality multi-
parameter meter are included in Appendix B. To reduce the potential of cross contamination, new, clean disposable nitrile gloves were worn during all
phases of sample handling. Collected samples were slowly poured into laboratory supplied containers pre-filled with appropriate preservatives and labeled with indelible ink, entered onto a chain-of-custody form, and immediately placed on wet ice in laboratory supplied coolers maintained at approximately four (4) degrees Celsius. The samples were transported under standard chin-of-custody protocol to Pace Analytical Services, LLC (Pace) located in West Columbia, South Carolina, a North Carolina certified laboratory, for chemical analysis. The samples were analyzed for VOCs including ethanol and the five (5) oxygenates by Standard Methods (SM) 6200B and for Lead using EPA Method 3030C.
4.2 GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE AND FLOW DIRECTION Depth to groundwater in the gauged monitoring wells ranged from 6.81-feet below top-of-casing (MW-6) to 13.91-feet below top-of-casing (MW-2). Groundwater elevations were calculated to range from 94.07-feet (MW-6) to 84.08-feet (MW-2) relative to a common benchmark with an assumed elevation of 100.00 feet.
A summary of groundwater gauging data is provided in Table 8. Based on this data, groundwater flow direction was interpreted to be towards the northwest at the subject site with an average hydraulic gradient of 0.091 (average of MW-6 to MW-3R and MW-3R to MW-2) as illustrated on Figure 6.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 5
4.3 LABORATORY RESULTS Laboratory analytical results were compared to the groundwater quality standards defined in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2L, Section .0202 (2L Standards) and Gross Contamination Levels (GCLs). Upon review of the laboratory analytical report, the groundwater samples from monitoring wells, MW-1, MW-2, MW-3R, and MW-5 contained concentrations of dissolved phase contaminants of concern (CoCs) at levels above 2L Standards. No exceedances of the GCLs were reported.
Exceedances include tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) and lead. Analytical results from water supply wells, WSW-3 and WSW-4, were not detected above laboratory method detection limits or 2L standards. A summary of laboratory analytical results is provided in Table 9 and illustrated on Figure 7. Chain-of-custody documentation and laboratory data reports area included as Appendix C. A hydrograph relating contaminant concentrations to groundwater elevations for monitoring well MW-3R is included in Appendix D.
4.4 ESTIMATED EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION Soil Soil sampling has not been performed at the site since CSA activities in 2008. Based on available historic soil analytical data, the extent of soil contamination above MSCCs is confined to the site and generally located northwest of the site building, totaling approximately 1,613 square feet (ft2). The depth of soil contamination extends to at least 8-feet BGS. This equates to a volume of 12,908 cubic feet (ft3). Maximum detected concentrations (MDCs) of CoCs and the applicable cleanup goals for soil are summarized in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 – Maximum Detected Concentrations for Soil Compared to Cleanup Goals
CoC MDC (mg/kg)
Groundwater Historically, groundwater contamination above 2L Standards, not including Lead, has been reported at the
locations of MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-5. Detections of Lead may be attributed to high turbidity in the samples and/or elevated natural background concentrations. According to currently available data, the horizontal extent of dissolved phase (groundwater) contamination appears to be proximal to monitoring
wells MW-1 and MW-3R. The total currently known extent of groundwater contamination above 2L Standards comprises an estimated 1,325-ft2 area on-site (Figure 8).
The groundwater plume appears to be oriented in a north-south direction. The horizontal extent of groundwater contamination above cleanup criteria is generally defined by monitoring wells not exhibiting concentrations above 2L Standards. As of January 2021, the vertical extent of groundwater contamination did not extend to depths greater than 35-feet BGS.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 6
During the most recent monitoring event, CoCs in groundwater exceeded the 2L Standards in two (2) of the five (5) samples. The current maximum groundwater contaminant concentrations observed during the recent reporting period compared to the historical maximum groundwater contaminant concentrations observed are summarized in Exhibit 2 below. Exhibit 2 – Summary of Maximum Groundwater Contaminant Concentrations
COC 2L
Standard GCL Current
MDC (µg/L) Location MDC Location & Date
424
2,220
3,050
1,760
8.91
95 1,390
60 60
Cross Sections indicating the current extent of contamination above regulatory limits and the assumed smear zone thickness based on historical water table elevations are included as Figure 9.
Due to a limited amount of contamination present in the groundwater during the December 2021 sampling event, fate and transport modeling was once again not performed. In addition, the evaluation of contaminant
mass was also not calculated at this time. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions are provided based upon the information and data collected during the December 2021 sampling event and evaluated by CES:

• Free product was not detected during the December 2021 groundwater monitoring event.
• TBA was reported above the 2L Standards in samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3R, and lead was detected above the 2L Standard in samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3R, and MW-5.
• Detections of lead may be attributed to turbidity in the samples and/or elevated natural background concentrations.
• None of the analytes tested for were detected above 2L Standards in water supply wells WSW-3 or WSW-4.
• Groundwater elevations exhibit a decreasing trend and were below the historic average during the most recent monitoring event. It should be noted most of the groundwater elevation data for the
site has been obtained during the winter months. Evaluation of data from monitoring well MW-3R infers the seasonal water table high may occur around June.
• Fluctuations of contaminant concentrations may be a factor of changes in groundwater elevation.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 7
5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the data collected during groundwater monitoring activities, CES recommends the site should be re-ranked and the incident considered for closure under a restrictive covenant.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89)
BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA
INCIDENT # 28327
GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 8
6.0 STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATION
1 Enter the date the monitoring report was due. 3/31/2022 Will this report be submitted after the
established due date?
YES NO
2 Was any required information from the above template missing from this report? YES NO
IF the answer to question #1 or# 2 is “YES”, please provide additional information in this cell to explain what was
missing and why.
3 If applicable, will an of the proposed attenuation milestones under the schedule approved in the Corrective Action Plan not be met? (within a reasonable margin of error)
YES NO
IF the answer to question #3 is “NO”, skip to the certification under #8 below.
IF the answer to question #3 is “YES”, please generally describe in this cell the possible reason(s) and outline
proposed remedies. (This should be described in more detail in the report text above.)
Not a licable milestones have not been determined for the site.
4 Does any known or suspected source zone soil contamination or free product remain outside of the
assessed area that could be inhibiting natural attenuation?
YES NO
5 Has there been an unexpected increase in contaminant mass sufficient to suggest a
potential new release from a separate onsite or offsite source?
YES NO
IF the answer to either question #6 or #7 is “YES”, generally describe in this cell any actions recommended to further
assess or clean up this known or suspected source. (This should be described in more detail in the report text above.)
6 Certification:
I, Rachel A. Raines, a Licensed Geologist for CES of NC, PLLC., do certify that the information contained in this report
is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Rachel A. Raines, NC PG# 2739
Geologist
CES of NC, PLLC. is licensed to practice geology in North Carolina. The certification number of the company or
corporation is C-550.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT 9
7.0 REMARKS
The recommendations contained in this report represent CES of NC, PLLC’s professional opinions based
upon the currently available information and are arrived at in accordance with currently accepted professional standards. This report is based upon a specific scope of work requested by the client. The contract between CES of NC, PLLC and its client outlines the scope of work, and only those tasks specifically authorized by that contract or outlined in this report were performed. This report is intended only for the use of CES of NC, PLLC’s client and anyone else specifically identified in writing by CES of NC, PLLC as a user of this report. CES of NC, PLLC will not and cannot be liable for unauthorized reliance by any other third party. Other than as contained in this paragraph, CES of NC, PLLC makes no express or implied warranty as to the contents of this report. 8.0 REFERENCES

• Geologic Map of North Carolina, September 29, 2015 - North Carolina Geological Survey
• North Carolina Division of Water Resources website: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources
• Comprehensive Site Assessment, August 18, 2008 - Best Geologic and Environmental Consulting, P.A.
• Groundwater Monitoring Report, July 29, 2013 – Best Geologic and Environmental Consulting, P.A.
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
FIGURES

5104 Reagan Drive, Suite 7
Charlotte, NC 28206
540-343-6256 (office) 540-343-6259 (fax)
FIGURE 1
Site Location Map
GPM 3089-D
3045 Tynecastle Highway
Banner Elk, North Carolina
Banner Elk, North Carolina Project:
Client: GPM Southeast, LLC
CES NC Job #: 9.0927
Date: 1/24/2022
Latitude:
36°08'08.5"N
Longitude:
81°50'42.3"W
Site Location
Groundwater
Monitoring Report
U.S.G.S Topographic Map of the
Valle Crucis Quadrangle, North Carolina,
7.5 Minute Series (revised 2016)
Scale: 1:24,000 Contour Interval: 40 Feet
Source:
National Geodetic Vertical
Datum 1988
Horizontal Datum:North American Datum 1983
Vertical Datum:
Project No:
Date:
Revision:
Project Manager:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
5104 Reagan Drive, Suite 7
Charlotte, NC 28206
540-343-6256 (phone)
540-343-6259 (fax)
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
GPM 3089-D
Site Map
Figure 23045 Tynecastle Highway,
Banner Elk, NC
GPM Southeast, LLC
DJF
RAR
2021 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report
9.0927
01/24/22
0
Incident #:
28327
0 40'80'160'
1 inch equals 80 feet
Water Supply Well (WSW) Location
WSW-4
Legend
Monitoring Well (MW) Location
WSW-1
WSW-3
MW-5
MW-1/1D
MW-6
MW-2
MW-4
Tyn
e
c
a
s
t
l
e

H
i
g
h
w
a
y
MW-3RFormer
UST Basin
Soil Boring Location
P2
P5
P1
P4
P3
1,500
250
1,000
Project No:
Date:
Revision:
Project Manager:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
5104 Reagan Drive, Suite 7
Charlotte, NC 28206
540-343-6256 (phone)
540-343-6259 (fax)
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
GPM 3089
Site Vicinity Map
Figure 33045 Tynecastle Highway,
Banner Elk, NC
GPM Investments Inc.
DJF
RAR
2021 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report
9.0927
01/24/22
0
Incident #:
28327
Property Lines
0 250'500'1,000'
1 inch equals 500 feet
Legend
1
2
1
34
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
24
18
23
Map IDs correlate to Tables 4 and 7
Site
25
26
1,500
250
1,000
Project No:
Date:
Revision:
Project Manager:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
5104 Reagan Drive, Suite 7
Charlotte, NC 28206
540-343-6256 (phone)
540-343-6259 (fax)
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
GPM 3089
WSWs Within 1,500-ft Radius Map
Figure 43045 Tynecastle Highway,
Banner Elk, NC
GPM Investments Inc.
DJF
RAR
2021 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report
9.0927
01/24/22
0
Incident #:
28327
Water Supply Well (WSW) Location
0 250'500'1,000'
1 inch equals 500 feet
Legend
WSW-1
WSW-4
WSW-3
WSW-23
WSW-25
WSW-31
WSW-18
WSW-7 WSW-8
WSW-9
WSW-13
WSW-11
WSW-19
WSW-30WSW-18WSW-17
WSW locations approximate
Figure adapted from: 2008 CSA Figure 2 - Water Wells
Map IDs correlate to Table 6
Project No:
Date:
Revision:
Project Manager:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
5104 Reagan Drive, Suite 7
Charlotte, NC 28206
540-343-6256 (phone)
540-343-6259 (fax)
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
GPM 3089-D
Extent of Impacted Soils Above STW
MSCCs
Figure 53045 Tynecastle Highway,
Banner Elk, NC
GPM Southeast, LLC
DJF
RAR
2021 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report
9.0927
01/24/22
0
Incident #:
28327
0 40'80'160'
1 inch equals 80 feet
WSW-4
Legend
MW-6
MW-2
MW-4
Tyn
e
c
a
s
t
l
e

H
i
g
h
w
a
y
MW-3R
Former
UST Basin
WSW-1
WSW-3
MW-5
Soil Boring Location
P2
P5
P4
P3
Approximate Extent of Soils Above STW MSCCs
MW-1/1D
P1
Project No:
Date:
Revision:
Project Manager:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
5104 Reagan Drive, Suite 7
Charlotte, NC 28206
540-343-6256 (phone)
540-343-6259 (fax)
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
GPM 3089-D
Potentiometric Map (12/23/2021)
Figure 63045 Tynecastle Highway,
Banner Elk, NC
GPM Southeast, LLC
DJF
RAR
2021 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report
9.0927
01/24/22
0
Incident #:
28327
Water Supply Well (WSW) Location
0 40'80'160'
1 inch equals 80 feet
WSW-4
Legend
Monitoring Well (MW) Location
WSW-1
WSW-3
MW-5
90.25
MW-6
94.07
MW-2
84.08
94.00'
92.00'
90.00'
88.00'
86.00'
Groundwater Contour Line
Groundwater Flow Direction
MW-3R
89.25
MW-4
MW-1/1D
91.34
Tyn
e
c
a
s
t
l
e

H
i
g
h
w
a
y
Project No:
Date:
Revision:
Project Manager:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
5104 Reagan Drive, Suite 7
Charlotte, NC 28206
540-343-6256 (phone)
540-343-6259 (fax)
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
GPM 3089-D
Groundwater Analtical Results Map
(12/23/2021)
Figure 73045 Tynecastle Highway,
Banner Elk, NC
GPM Southeast, LLC
DJF
RAR
2021 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report
9.0927
01/24/22
0
Incident #:
28327
Water Supply Well (WSW) Location
0 40'80'160'
1 inch equals 80 feet
WSW-4
Legend
Monitoring Well (MW) Location
WSW-1
WSW-3
MW-5
MTBE: 0.43 J
Lead: 62
MW-3R
Xylenes: 0.43 J
MTBE: 2.9
IPE: 4.1
TAA: 16 J
TBA: 60
Lead: 49
MW-2
MTBE: 0.57 J
Lead: 95
All concentrations in ug/L
MW-6
Lead: 5.8 J
MW-4
Tyne
c
a
s
t
l
e

H
i
g
h
w
a
y
MW-1
Benzene: 0.52
MTBE: 20
TAME: 0.78 J
TBA: 12 J
Lead: 81
Project No:
Date:
Revision:
Project Manager:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
5104 Reagan Drive, Suite 7
Charlotte, NC 28206
540-343-6256 (phone)
540-343-6259 (fax)
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
GPM 3089-D
NCAC 2L Standard Exceedances Map
(12/23/2021)
Figure 83045 Tynecastle Highway,
Banner Elk, NC
GPM Southeast, LLC
DJF
RAR
2021 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report
9.0927
01/24/22
0
Incident #:
28327
Water Supply Well (WSW) Location
0 40'80'160'
1 inch equals 80 feet
WSW-4
Legend
Monitoring Well (MW) Location
WSW-1
WSW-3
MW-5
MW-3R
MW-2
Lead > 15 Contour Line
MW-1/MW-1D
MW-6
MW-4
TBA > 10 Contour Line
asphalt/grav
e
l
asphalt/gravel
asphalt/gravel
MW-2 MW-5 MW-1D
MW-3R
MW-6
99.00
98.00
100.00
101.00
96.00
95.00
97.00
93.00
92.00
94.00
90.00
89.00
91.00
87.00
86.00
88.00
84.00
83.00
85.00
81.00
80.00
82.00
78.00
77.00
79.00
75.00
76.00
70.00
65.00
55.00
A
A'
gravel/soil fill
no recovery
alluvial material
partially
weathered rock
weathered
rock
gravel/soil fill no recovery
alluvial material
Ele
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
0 10
0
5
2.5
5
Horizontal Scale
(feet)
Vertical Scale
(feet)
MW-1
Monitoring Well
Screen Interval
Extent of Soil Boring
Legend
CLIENT:
LOCATION:
MW-5
MW-6
MW-2
MW-3R
MW-4
MW-1/1DA
A'
GPM 3089-D
Cross Section A-A'
Figure 93045 Tynecastle Highway,
Banner Elk, NC
GPM Southeast, LLC
2021 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report
Tyn
e
c
a
s
t
l
e
High
w
a
y
Cross Section Location
Water Leve
l

H
i
g
h
Water Le
v
e
l

L
o
w
Water Leve
l

H
i
g
h
Water Leve
l

L
o
w
Estimated Extent of
Groundwater Exceeding
2L Standards
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT

TABLES

TABLE 1
UST/AST SYSTEM AND OTHER RELEASE INFORMATION
GPM 3089 (Scotchman #89)
Banner Elk, Avery County, North Carolina
Incident No. 28327
UST ID
Number
Current/Last
Contents (in Construction
Details Associated Piping and Date Tank
Installed Status of UST associated with
1 Gasoline 6000 Single-Walled
Steel
Double-Walled Steel,
pressurized 4/16/1983 Removal Yes
2 Gasoline 6000 Single-Walled
Steel Other, pressurized 4/16/1983 Removal Yes
3 Gasoline 6000 Single-Walled
Steel Other, pressurized 4/16/1983 Removal Yes
4 Kerosene 4000 Single-Walled
Steel Other, suction 4/16/1983 Removal No
5 Diesel 4000 Single-Walled
Steel
Double-Walled Steel,
pressurized 4/16/1983 Removal No
Incident
Number Discovered Released
28327 6/20/2005 Gasoline
Notes: - UST information provided by NCDEQ Registered Tanks Database
Discovery of Release
UST closures
UST ID Number 1 through 5 Facility ID Number 24878
City State Zip Telephone Number
Wilmington NC 28406 910-796-2445
Notes:
Data obtained from NCDEQ UST Database(s)
TABLE 2
SITE HISTORY - UST OWNER / OPERATOR
GPM 3089 (Scotchman #89)
3045 Tyncastle Highway
Banner Elk, Avery County, North Carolina
Street Address
P. O. Box 3227
Worsley Operating Corp 1983 to 2005 (removed)
Sample ID
Date
Collected
Sample
BGS)
Incident
Phase
68 540 N/A 31 24 0.0072 2.4 2.2 8 1.3 0.12 0.085 0.2 1.4 5.4 6.6 6.6 6
939 1,500 31,000 469 14,000 12 782 1,560 60 1,560 1,560 156 5.5 1,560 1,250 156 156 3,120
24,528 40,000 8.1+E05 12,264 2.1+E05 59.4 11,600 23,300 297 23,300 23,300 1,810 27 23,300 18,600 2,330 2,330 46,700
166 <11.8 <0.592 8.73 1.03 0.998 <0.592 5.77 <0.592 3.86 0.762 0.748 59.9 <0.592 19.6
0.109 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.006 <0.0121
0.105 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.0099
Notes:
Analytes not shown were below reporting limits in all samples.MSCC = maximum soil contaminant concentration E - Estimated value due to exceedance of calibration range.
ft BGS = feet below ground surface NA - Not Analyzed
Results in mg/kg
Bold face type indicates exceedance of regulatory limit.
*Soil excavation stockpile sample.
1: Sum of C9-C12 Aliphatics and C9-C18 Aliphatics, Please note EPH was not sampled for
2: Sum of C9-C10 Aromatics and C11-C22 Aromatics, Please note EPH was not sampled for
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GPM 3089 (Former Scotchman #89)
3045 Tynecastle Highway, Banner Elk, NC
Incident No. 28327
C1
9
-
C
3
6

A
l
i
p
h
a
t
i
c
s
C9
-
C
2
2

A
r
o
m
a
t
i
c
s
2
Analytical Method (e.g. VOC by EPA 8260)MADEP VPH and EPH EPA Method 8260
1
Name Address Name Address
4370 Woodbourne Drive 3045 Tynecastle Highway
Clemmons, NC 27012 Banner Elk, NC 28604
34 Cynthia Lane 34 Cynthia Lane
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Banner Elk, NC 28604
84 Cynthia Lane 84 Cynthia Lane
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Banner Elk, NC 28604
2220 NE 199 Street 89 Cynthia Lane
North Miami Beach, FL 33180 Banner Elk, NC 28604
9024 Boyd Drive 130 Old Dairy Farm Road
Matthews, NC 28105 Banner Elk, NC 28604
9024 Boyd Drive 65 Old Dairy Farm Road
Matthews, NC 28105 Banner Elk, NC 28604
115 Cynthia Lane 115 Cynthia Lane
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Banner Elk, NC 28604
2611 West Lutz Lake Fern Road 155 Cynthia Road
Lutz, FL 33558 Banner Elk, NC 28604
1320 North Lakeside Drive 177 Cynthia Lane
Lake Worth, FL 33460 Banner Elk, NC 28604
P.O. Box 18612 Cynthia Lane
Tampa, FL 33619 Banner Elk, NC 28604
4370 Woodbourne Drive Cynthia Lane
Clemmons, NC 27012 Banner Elk, NC 28604
P.O. Box 669 Dobbins Road
Burnsville, NC 28714 Banner Elk, NC 28604
P.O. Box 699 118 Paupers Ridge Lane
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Banner Elk, NC 28604
185800931799 11 Timber Jack, LLC Undeveloped Wooded Lot
186817013485 12 Martha Eggers Residence
186817012089 Site Sugar Creek Gem MineNorwood Family Limited
Partnership
186817006424 1 Residence
186817018378 10 Partnership Undeveloped Wooded Lot
186817006653 2 Residence
Ashley Ford and Brandon Ford
Floyd R. Townsend and Edna
Townsend
186817005748 3 Residence
186817004864 4 Residence
Gary Elimelech and Mindy
Elimelech
Lawrence C. Hendricks and Lora C.
Hendricks
TABLE 4
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/OCCUPANTS
GPM 3089 (Former Scotchman #89)
3045 Tynecastle Highway, Banner Elk, NC
Incident No. 28327
Parcel Number Map ID
#
186817004804 5 Residence
186817006900 6 Residence
Lawrence C. Hendricks and Lora C.
Hendricks
John C. Lakey, III
186817016064 7 Susan Padgett and Barbara Rushing Residence
186817016230 Zbigniew Ryniak, et al.8 Undeveloped Lot
18687018244 9 Robert Putnam Undeveloped Wooded Lot
Name Address Name Address
TABLE 4
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/OCCUPANTS
GPM 3089 (Former Scotchman #89)
3045 Tynecastle Highway, Banner Elk, NC
Incident No. 28327
Parcel Number Map ID
#
1320 North Lakeside Drive 116 Paupers Ridge Lane
Lake Worth, FL 33460 Banner Elk, NC 28604
P.O. Box 156 Paupers Ridge Lane
Crossnore, NC 28616 Banner Elk, NC 28604
3855 East Thornton Avenue 100 Paupers Ridge Lane
Gilbert, AZ 85297 Banner Elk, NC 28604
4370 Woodbourne Drive 55 Paupers Ridge Lane
Clemmons, NC 27012 Banner Elk, NC 28604
5524 Pine Tree Drive 71 Pepper Place Lane
Miami Beach, FL 33140 Banner Elk, NC 28604
720 Stoneybrook Lane 2943 Tynecastle Highway
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Banner Elk, NC 28604
264 Naverre Drive 2960 Tynecastle Highway
Miami Springs, FL 33166 Sugar Mountain, NC 28604
P.O. Box 382 106 Sugar Mountain Drive
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Sugar Mountain, NC 28604
P.O. Box 369 Tynecastle Highway
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Sugar Mountain, NC 28604
P.O. Box 1175 3071 Tynecastle Highway
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Banner Elk, NC 28604
3005 Lake Pointe Drive 72 Arnett Road
Belmont, NC 28012 Banner Elk, NC 28604
106 Sugar Mountain Drive Arnett Road
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Banner Elk, NC 28604
Notes:
Map ID# keyed to Figure 3, Site Vicinity Map.
185708998865 21 Sugar Mountain Resort, Inc.Landscaped Lot
186817001157 22 Banner Elk Sports Properties, LLC Extreme Snowboard and Ski
185820905318 19 Tynecastle Properties, LLC Available Commercial Property
185820906366 20 Dan L. Plyler and Dereka E. Plyler Vacasa Sugar Mountain
185820905996 14 Carolina Property Management
Services, LLC Undeveloped Lot
186817002164 23 David Switzer and Jennifer Switzer Residence
186817000578 17 Brian Lieberman and Annika
Lieberman Residence
185820906629 18 Jay C. Zoellner Multiple Commercial Businesses
186817000961 15 Lori M. Lane and Scott C. Lane Residence
185820908643 16 Bettie Norwood Residence
185820917375 13 Zbigniew Ryniak and Iwona Ryniak Residence
186817003362 24 CommercialDereka's Sugar Mountain Accomm
Center and Realty, Inc.
Map ID/
Well
Number
Property Location Owner Address Property Owner Well Use
Connected To
Municipal
Water System
Well Depth
(ft. BGS)
Type of
Well
Well Casing
Depth
(ft. BGS)
Approximate
Distance of Well
from Source Area of
Release (ft.)
WSW-1 65 Arnett Road
Banner Elk, NC 28604
55 Paupers Ridge Road
Banner Elk, NC 28604
Norwood Family
Limited Partnership Potable No Unknown Unknown Unknown 250 East
WSW-3 55 Paupers Ridge Road
Banner Elk, NC 28604
55 Paupers Ridge Road
Banner Elk, NC 28604 Bettie Norwood Potable No Unknown Drilled Unknown 420 Northwest
WSW-4 3071 Tynecastle Hwy
Banner Elk, NC 28604
PO Box 1175
Banner Elk, NC 28604
Banner Elk Sports
Properties, LLC Potable No Unknown Drilled Unknown 250 Southeast
TABLE 5
SAMPLED WATER SUPPLY WELL INFORMATION
GPM 3089 (Former Scotchman #89)
3045 Tynecastle Highway, Banner Elk, NC
Incident No. 28327
Well #Well Owner Owner Address Well Use Connected to
Public Water?
Well Depth
(ft BGS)
Type of
Well
Well Casing
Depth (ft BGS)
Well Screen
Interval (ft BGS)source area of
1 Norwood Family Limited
Partnership
55 Paupers Ridge Road, Banner Elk, NC
28605 Potable No NA NA NA NA 250 East
2 Norwood Family Limited
Partnership
55 Paupers Ridge Road, Banner Elk, NC
28605 Potable No 105 Drilled NA NA 400 Northeast
3 Bettie Norwood Potable No NA NA NA NA 420 northwest
4 Sugar View Real Estate
Investors, LLC PO Box 2496, Banner Elk, NC 28609 Potable No NA Drilled NA NA 250 Southeast
5 Cari Ashbaugh Potable No NA Drilled NA NA 560 East
6 Harry Dean Gwyn 84 Arnett Road Banner Elk, NC 28605 Potable No NA NA NA NA 440 Southeast
7 Frank Ruppard Potable No NA NA NA NA 780 East
8 Serenity Day Spa 72 Arnett Road Banner Elk, NC 28605 Potable No NA Drilled NA NA 950 East
9 Lena Owens 34 Cynthia Lane Banner Elk, NC 28605 Potable No NA NA NA NA 650 Northeast
10 Buster Ruppard Potable No NA NA NA NA 900 Northeast
11 Gary Elimelech Potable No NA NA NA NA 950 Northeast
12 Mack Ruppard PO Box 2496, Banner Elk, NC 28605 Potable No NA NA NA NA 700 Southeast
13 Lawrence Hendricks 9024 Boyd Drive Matthews, NC 28 I05 Potable No NA NA NA NA 825 Northeast
14 Davis Hickok PO Box 517, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Potable No NA NA NA NA 1,050 Northeast
15 Floyd Townsend 84 Cynthia Lane, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Potable No NA NA NA NA 1,050 Northeast
TABLE 6
ADDITIONAL WATER SUPPLY WELL INFORMATION
GPM 3089 (Former Scotchman #89)
3045 Tynecastle Highway, Banner Elk, NC
Incident No. 28327
Well #Well Owner Owner Address Well Use Connected to
Public Water?
Well Depth
(ft BGS)
Type of
Well
Well Casing
Depth (ft BGS)
Well Screen
Interval (ft BGS)source area of
16 M. Scott Zoellner PO Box 66, Jensen Beach, FL 34598 Potable No NA NA NA NA 550 Northwest
17 Charles Eggers PO Box 699, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Potable No NA NA NA NA 1,200 Northeast
18 Betty Jo Gwyn 84 Arnett Road Banner Elk, NC 28604 Potable No NA NA NA NA 1,100 Northeast
19 Carroll Roney PO Box 341, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Potable No NA NA NA NA 1,200 Northeast
20 Zbigniew Ryniak Potable No NA NA NA NA 1,200 North
21 Village of Sugar Mountain PO Box 1135, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Irrigation No NA NA NA NA 1,450 Southwest
22 Carolina Water Service of
NC 259 Dell Road, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Potable No NA NA NA NA 785 Northwest
23 Banner Elk Church of Christ PO Box 1719, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Unknown Yes NA NA NA NA 600 Southwest
24 William H. Cannon PO Box 369, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Unknown No NA NA NA NA 600 South
25 Paul and Edna Townsend Unknown No NA NA NA NA I, 150 Southwest
26 Alpine Recreation, Inc.Potable No NA NA NA NA 950 South
27 William H. Cannon PO Box 369, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Unknown No NA NA NA NA 800 South
28 William H. Cannon PO Box 369, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Unknown No NA NA NA NA 950 South
29 William H. Cannon PO Box 369, Banner Elk, NC 28604 Unknown No NA NA NA NA 1,100 South
30 Gonzalo Sanabria Potable No NA NA NA NA 1,350 Northeast
31 Larry Padgett Potable No NA NA NA NA 700 Southeast
220 Blaine Norwood Road ~550 feet
Banner Elk, NC 28604 west
185 Norwood Hollow Road
Banner Elk, NC 28604 west
Notes:
Map ID# keyed to Figure 3, Site Vicinity Map.
Life Care Center of Banner Elk
TABLE 7
SENSITIVE LAND USE FEATURES
GPM 3089 (Former Scotchman #89)
3045 Tynecastle Highway, Banner Elk, NC
Incident No. 28327
Map ID #Date
Determined Location / Address Distance and Direction
from Source Area
25 2/23/2022
Land Use Feature
Banner Elk Church of Christ
26 2/23/2022
Well ID Date Elevation1
Depth to Water
from TOC
(Feet)
Assumed
Groundwater
Elevation (Feet)
Well
Depth
(Feet)
Well Screen
Interval
(Feet)
6/5/2008 99.58 7.44 92.14 19 4-19
6/25/2013 99.58 5.39 94.19 19 4-19
12/8/14 99.58 7.30 92.28 19 4-19
1/26/2016 99.58 7.05 92.53 19 4-19
10/19/2017 99.58 6.72 92.86 19 4-19
12/6/2018 99.58 6.40 93.18 19 4-19
12/4/2019 99.58 6.57 93.01 19 4-19
1/12/2021 99.58 7.02 92.56 19 4-19
12/23/2021 99.58 8.24 91.34 19 4-19
6/5/2008 99.11 7.28 91.83 40 35-40
12/8/14 99.11 6.75 92.36 40 35-40
1/26/2016 99.11 6.31 92.80 40 35-40
12/6/2018 99.11 N/A N/A 40 35-40
12/4/2019 99.11 7.03 92.08 40 35-40
1/12/2021 99.11 7.03 92.08 40 35-40
12/23/2021
6/5/2008 97.99 13.41 84.58 20 5-20
1/26/2013 97.99 13.06 84.93 20 5-20
12/8/14 97.99 13.25 84.74 20 5-20
1/26/2016 97.99 13.45 84.54 20 5-20
10/19/2017 97.99 13.55 84.44 20 5-20
12/6/2018 97.99 13.34 84.65 20 5-20
12/4/2019 97.99 13.52 84.47 20 5-20
1/12/2021 97.99 13.52 84.47 20 5-20
12/23/2021 97.99 13.91 84.08 20 5-20
MW-3 6/5/2008 100.00 8.81 91.19 14 4-14
6/25/2013 96.31 5.74 90.57 14 4-14
12/8/14 96.31 6.00 90.31 14 4-14
1/26/2016 96.31 6.60 89.71 14 4-14
10/19/2017 96.31 6.55 89.76 14 4-14
12/6/2018 96.31 6.86 89.45 14 4-14
12/4/2019 96.31 6.95 89.36 14 4-14
1/12/2021 96.31 7.23 89.08 14 4-14
12/23/2021 96.31 7.06 89.25 14 4-14
6/5/2008 99.68 6.30 93.38 20 5-20
12/4/2019
1/12/2021
GPM 3089 (Former Scotchman #89)
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
Well Not Located
TABLE 8
Incident No. 28327
3045 Tynecastle Highway, Banner Elk, NC
MW-4
MW-1
MW-1D
MW-2
MW-3R
Well ID Date Elevation1
Depth to Water
from TOC
(Feet)
Assumed
Groundwater
Elevation (Feet)
Well
Depth
(Feet)
Well Screen
Interval
(Feet)
6/5/2008 98.70 7.65 91.05 20 5-20
6/25/2013 98.70 7.45 91.25 20 5-20
12/8/14 98.70 7.80 90.90 20 5-20
1/26/2016 98.70 7.50 91.20 20 5-20
12/4/2019
1/12/2021 98.70 7.94 90.76 20 5-20
12/23/2021 98.70 8.45 90.25 20 5-20
6/5/2008 100.88 6.11 94.77 15 5-15
6/25/2013 100.88 6.38 94.50 15 5-15
12/8/14 100.88 6.81 94.07 15 5-15
1/26/2016 100.88 6.43 94.45 15 5-15
10/19/2017 100.88 6.62 94.26 15 5-15
12/6/2018 100.88 6.35 94.53 15 5-15
12/4/2019 100.88 6.22 94.66 15 5-15
1/12/2021 100.88 5.94 94.94 15 5-15
12/23/2021 100.88 6.81 94.07 15 5-15
Notes
Top-of-casing (TOC) elevations are based on an arbitrary benchmark elevation of 100.00 feet above mean sea
level.
MW-6
MW-5
Well ID Date Benzene
(μg/L)
Toluene
(μg/L)
Ethylbenzene
(μg/L)
Total Xylenes
(μg/L)
Methy Tert-Butyl Ether (μg/L)
Di-Isopropyl Ether
(μg/L)Naphthalene (μg/L)Lead
(μg/L)
Ethanol
(μg/L)
Tert-Amyl Alcohol
(μg/L)
Tert-Amyl methyl Ether (μg/L)
Tert-Butyl Alcohol
(μg/L)
Tert-Butyl Formate
(μg/L)
Ethyl Tert-Butyl
Ether (μg/L)
1 600 600 500 20 70 6 15 NSE 40 128 10 40 47
5,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 20,000 25,000 6,000 15,000 NSE 40,000 12,800 10,000 40,000 47,000
7/11/2007 9.3 5.45 38.1 49.3 974 6.03 N/A 221 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/25/2013 <1 <5 <1 NA 14 <1 N/A 190 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/8/2014 < 0.0204 U < 0.268 U < 0.0221 U < 0.149 U 34.2 NA N/A 58.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1/26/2016 0.390 J < 0.0570 U < 0.0920 U < 0.122 U 44.1 0.430 J N/A NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
10/19/2017 0.31 J < 0.17 < 0.13 < 0.39 23 0.23 J N/A 66 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/6/2018 <.5 <.5 <.5 <1 10.4 <.5 N/A 8.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/4/2019 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 10.4 <1.0 <2.0 286 <200 <100 <10.0 <20.0 <20.0 <10.0
1/12/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 19 <0.50 0.41 J 95 <100 <20 0.59 J 14 J <5.0 <1.0
12/23/2021 0.52 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 20 <0.50 <0.50 81 <100 <20 0.78 J 12 J <5.0 <1.0
3/14/2008 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 N/A 10.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/8/2014 < 0.0204 U < 0.268 U < 0.0221 U < 0.149 U < 1.22 U NA N/A < 3.30 U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1/26/2016 < 0.119 U < 0.0570 U < 0.0920 U < 0.122 U < 0.169 U < 0.0920 U N/A NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/4/2019 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <100 <10.0 <20.0 <20.0 <10.0
1/12/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 5.1 J <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
12/23/2021
3/13/2008 1.9 <1 1.5 16.7 5.2 <1 N/A 527 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/25/2013 <1 <5 <1 NA <1 <1 N/A 28 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/8/2014 < 0.0204 U < 0.268 U < 0.0221 U < 0.149 U < 1.22 U NA N/A 14 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1/26/2016 < 0.119 U < 0.0570 U < 0.0920 U < 0.122 U < 0.169 U < 0.0920 U N/A NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
10/19/2017 < 0.12 < 0.17 < 0.13 < 0.39 < 0.090 < 0.18 N/A 60 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/6/2018 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.18 N/A 5.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/4/2019 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 25.7 <200 <100 <10.0 <20.0 <20.0 <10.0
1/12/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 34 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
12/23/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 0.57 <0.50 <0.50 95 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
MW-3 3/13/2008 424 2,220 492 3,050 1,760 <100 N/A 134 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/25/2013 36 <25 65 NA 250 13 N/A 180 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/8/2014 3.77 J < 0.268 U 6.08 6.37 31.2 NA N/A 11 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1/26/2016 1.30 0.100 J 2.18 1.11 30.1 8.91 N/A NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
10/19/2017 < 0.12 < 0.17 0.17 1.9 2.6 2.8 N/A 22 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/6/2018 1.3 <0.17 0.72 <1 8.2 <.50 N/A 5.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/4/2019 13.1 <1.0 18.6 <3.0 25.6 4.9 2.2 29.6 <200 <100 <10.0 53.1 <20.0 <10.0
1/12/2021 1.2 <0.50 4.1 <1.0 3.4 3.0 0.50 57 <100 11 J <10 49 <5.0 <1.0
12/23/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.43 J 2.9 4.1 <0.50 49 <100 16 J <10 60 <5.0 <1.0
3/13/2008 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 16.7 <2.5 <2.5 N/A 157 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3/13/2008 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 N/A 157 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/24/2009 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 N/A 41.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
9/10/2009 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 N/A 147 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/16/2009 <1 <1 <1 <2 1 <2 N/A 72.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3/1/2010 <1 <1 <1 <2 1 <1 N/A 203 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/23/2010 <1 <1 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 309 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/20/2010 <1 <5 <1 <3 1 <1 N/A 160 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/21/2011 <1 <5 <1 <3 2 <1 N/A 740 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/12/2011 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 780 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/28/2012 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 220 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
9/26/2012 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 220 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/19/2012 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A <5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/4/2019
1/12/2021
TABLE 9
2L Standard
GCL
3045 Tynecastle Highway, Banner Elk, NC
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATA
GPM 3089 (Former Scotchman #89)
Incident No. 28327
MW-1
MW-1D
MW-2
MW-3R
Not Sampled
MW-4
Could not locate well - Presumed destroyed - No sample collected
Could not locate well - No sample collected
Well ID Date Benzene
(μg/L)
Toluene
(μg/L)
Ethylbenzene
(μg/L)
Total Xylenes
(μg/L)
Methy Tert-Butyl Ether (μg/L)
Di-Isopropyl Ether
(μg/L)Naphthalene (μg/L)Lead
(μg/L)
Ethanol
(μg/L)
Tert-Amyl Alcohol
(μg/L)
Tert-Amyl methyl Ether (μg/L)
Tert-Butyl Alcohol
(μg/L)
Tert-Butyl Formate
(μg/L)
Ethyl Tert-Butyl
Ether (μg/L)
1 600 600 500 20 70 6 15 NSE 40 128 10 40 47
5,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 20,000 25,000 6,000 15,000 NSE 40,000 12,800 10,000 40,000 47,000
3/14/2008 <1 2.3 <1 2.3 3.1 <1 N/A 1390 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/24/2009 <1 <1 <1 <2 10.5 <1 N/A 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
9/10/2009 <1 <1 <1 <2 22.9 <1 N/A 28.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/16/2009 <1 <1 <1 <2 9 <2 N/A 30 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/23/2010 <1 <1 <1 <3 1.8 <1 N/A 154 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
9/30/2010 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 160 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/20/2010 <1 <5 <1 <3 6 <1 N/A 76 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3/23/2011 <1 <5 <1 <3 2.6 <1 N/A 82 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/21/2011 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 97 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
9/27/2011 <1 <5 <1 <3 2.8 <1 N/A 51 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/12/2011 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 53 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
3/15/2012 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 46 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/28/2012 <1 <5 <1 <3 2.2 <1 N/A 17 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
9/26/2012 <1 <1 <1 <3 2.3 <1 N/A 75.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/19/2012 <1 <1 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A <5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/25/2013 <1 <1 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 25 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/8/2014 < 0.0204 U < 0.268 U < 0.0221 U < 0.149 U < 1.22 U NA N/A 10.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1/26/2016 < 0.119 U < 0.0570 U < 0.0920 U < 0.122 U 1.59 < 0.0920 U N/A NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/4/2019
1/12/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 45 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
12/23/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 0.43 J <0.50 <0.50 62 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
6/5/2008 <1 8.4 5 38.9 <1 <1 N/A 448 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/24/2009 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 N/A 47.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
9/10/2009 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 N/A 187 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/16/2009 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 N/A 74.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/23/2010 <1 <1 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 304 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/20/2010 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 200 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/21/2011 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 940 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/12/2011 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 240 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/28/2012 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/19/2012 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 6.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/25/2013 <1 <5 <1 <3 <1 <1 N/A 430 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/8/2014 < 0.0204 U < 0.268 U < 0.0221 U < 0.149 U < 1.22 U NA N/A 42.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1/26/2016 < 0.119 U < 0.0570 U < 0.0920 U < 0.122 U < 0.169 U < 0.0920 U N/A NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
10/19/2017 < 0.12 < 0.17 < 0.13 < 0.39 < 0.090 < 0.18 N/A 37 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/6/2018 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.18 N/A 59.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/4/2019 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 81.3 <200 <100 <10.0 <20.0 <20.0 <10.0
1/12/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 38 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
12/23/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 5.8 J <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
12/8/2014 < 0.0204 U < 0.268 U < 0.0221 U < 0.149 U < 1.22 U NA N/A < 3.30 U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6/22/2016 < 0.119 U < 0.0570 U < 0.0920 U <0.180 U < 0.169 U < 0.0920 U N/A <3.30 U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
10/19/2017 < 0.12 0.45 J < 0.13 < 0.39 < 0.090 < 0.18 N/A < 4.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/6/2018 <0.12 <0.5 <0.13 <1.5 <0.090 <0.18 N/A <4.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/4/2019 <1.0 0.40 J <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <100 <10.0 <20.0 <20.0 <10.0
1/12/2021
12/23/2021
6/22/2016 < 0.119 U < 0.0570 U < 0.0920 U <0.180 U < 0.169 U < 0.0920 U N/A <3.30 U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
10/19/2017 < 0.12 < 0.17 < 0.13 < 0.39 < 0.090 < 0.18 N/A < 4.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/6/2018 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.18 N/A <4.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/4/2019 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <100 <10.0 <20.0 <20.0 <10.0
1/12/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <10 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
12/23/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <10 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
WSW-3
Not Sampled
Could not locate well - No sample collected
MW-5
MW-6
WSW-1
Not Sampled
Well ID Date Benzene
(μg/L)
Toluene
(μg/L)
Ethylbenzene
(μg/L)
Total Xylenes
(μg/L)
Methy Tert-Butyl Ether (μg/L)
Di-Isopropyl Ether
(μg/L)Naphthalene (μg/L)Lead
(μg/L)
Ethanol
(μg/L)
Tert-Amyl Alcohol
(μg/L)
Tert-Amyl methyl Ether (μg/L)
Tert-Butyl Alcohol
(μg/L)
Tert-Butyl Formate
(μg/L)
Ethyl Tert-Butyl
Ether (μg/L)
1 600 600 500 20 70 6 15 NSE 40 128 10 40 47
5,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 20,000 25,000 6,000 15,000 NSE 40,000 12,800 10,000 40,000 47,000
12/8/2014 < 0.0204 U < 0.268 U < 0.0221 U < 0.149 U < 1.22 U NA N/A < 3.30 U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
1/26/2016 < 0.119 U < 0.0570 U < 0.0920 U < 0.122 U < 0.169 U < 0.0980 U N/A NA N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
10/19/2017 < 0.12 < 0.17 < 0.13 < 0.39 < 0.090 < 0.18 N/A < 4.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/6/2018 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.18 N/A <4.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
12/4/2019 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <5.0 <200 <100 <10.0 <20.0 <20.0 <10.0
1/12/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <10 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
12/23/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <10 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
SW-1 1/12/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <10 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
SW-2 1/12/2021 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <10 <100 <20 <10 <20 <5.0 <1.0
Notes
Bold/Highlighted - Concentration exceeds applicable groundwater quality standard
2L Standard - North Carolina Administrative Code 2L Groundwater Quality Standard
GCL - Gross Contamination Levels for Groundwater (NCDEQ Guidelines for Assessment and Corrective Action for UST Releases)
< - Denotes analytical result below laboratory method detection limit
ug/L - Micrograms per liter
J - Indicates estimated concentration between laboratory report limit and method detection limit
U - Concentration is below laboratory method detection limit
WSW-4
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT

APPENDIX A
RECENT CORRESPONDENCE

Site Name City / County /Avery Incident #28327
Resp Pty Name / Contact Incident Mgr Region ASH
(Owner/Operator / Landowner / Attny-in-fact)Change Order?Prev. TA #TA-30
Consultant / Project Mgr Allison Streams
Telephone / Fax Number Task Authorization Number:31 ChangeOrd:
Project Mgr Email Site Risk / Rank / Abatement:H375D RRA Date:11/9/2007
Proposal# / Scope Dates % Commercial (C=100%, NC=0%, Both=1%-99%)
Has STF Eligibility Been Determined? (Y/N)Site Status (Active or NFA Date)
With Claim: [ ] All Main Consultant/Contractor invoices attached?[ ] Proof of payment attached directly to the front of each invoice?
w Important: The date of reimbursement is dependent on the Trust Fund balance. There may be a delay in the reimbursement of claims for work under this ePATA.
3r
d

P
t
y

D
e
d
?
Task #Lab /
SubCode RO

A
u
t
h
Proposed
Rate/Price
(Consultant)CO

A
u
t
h
Proposed Task
Subtotal
(Consultant)
Preapproved
Subtotal
(UST Section)
Claimed
Amount3
(Consultant)
4.031 6 / well Y $110.00 y $660.00 $660.00 /
4.041 3 / well Y $75.00 y $225.00 $225.00 /
4.090 #272 9 / sample Y $62.00 y $558.00 $558.00 /
4.090 #330 9 / sample Y $13.00 y $117.00 $117.00 /
4.090 #500 3 / sample Y $13.00 n $39.00 $0.00 /
4.090 #490 3 / sample Y $18.00 n $54.00 $0.00 /
4.090 #441 3 / sample Y $13.00 n $39.00 $0.00 /
4.090 #510 3 / sample Y $14.00 n $42.00 $0.00 /
4.090 #660 3 / sample Y $9.00 n $27.00 $0.00 /
4.090 #521 3 / sample Y $66.00 n $198.00 $0.00 /
4.090 #590 3 / sample Y $35.00 n $105.00 $0.00 /
4.091 1 / event Y $150.00 y $150.00 $150.00 /
5.070 1 / site Y $2,800.00 y $2,800.00 $2,800.00 /
6.090 1 / report Y $1,800.00 y $1,800.00 $1,800.00 /
12.050 1 / trip Y $250.00 y $250.00 $250.00 /
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
Requested Preapproved Claimed3
TOTAL:$7,064.00 $6,560.00 TOTAL:
Total Standard Costs (Not Third Party)$7,064.00 $6,560.00 Total Standard Costs
Total applied as Third Party Deductible/Damage Costs $0.00 $0.00 Total Third Pty Costs
Process Tracking (Date)
TA Submittal: 9/23/21 by:(PM)(Reserved for RO)
RO Review: 9/24/21 by:(IM)Joint UST Preapproval Confirmed By:1
CO Review: 9/30/21 by:(STF)RP or Designee Receipt Confirmed By:4
1 - This ePATA expires one year from the Joint UST Preapproval date. This does not extend, alter, or supersede any regulatory deadlines (e.g., NORR's, NOV's, Enforcements, etc.)
DWM/UST ePATA 8/1/2020
AES
Proposed
Units / Type
(Consultant)
Dan Murphy
activeYES
TA-31 9/23/2021-3/31/2022
540-343-6259
Dates of Work
(Consultant)
Started1 / Completed2
FINAL REIMBURSEMENT
C=100%
NO
[e-mail]
GPM Southeast, LLC Rolfe Lann
CES of NC, PLLC
DIRECTED COSTS
(Must Complete with Claim Submittal)(See Instructions / RRD for Tasks requiring Preapproval / Task Authorization)
Owner/Operator
980-819-9333
(Reserved for Incident Manager)
PREAPPROVAL / TASK AUTHORIZATION
GPM 3089
Note: This Electronic Preapproval Task Authorization (ePATA) shall be used to receive preapproval from the UST Section. A proposal,including maps and figures,must be
attached to elaborate on the costs for the tasks listed below that describes thescope of work and the rationale for the proposed activities.If, following completion of this ePATA,
you discover that unexpected tasks must be performed, incurring costs for tasks not originally included with this form, you must complete and submit a separate ePATA request
designated as a "Change Order" in the provided space above prior to conducting those tasks. Include a copy of the prior ePATA form for confirmation. Please attach this form to
the cover of the corresponding claim when requesting reimbursement. IMPORTANT:Only one claim may be submitted per ePATA and all work on the ePATA must have been
completed within 12 months of the completion date of the FIRST completed task to remain within the Statute of Limitations. All ePATAs submitted within a claim are closed with
that claim, and may not be re-used in a separate submittal, even for costs or tasks that were not originally claimed. Final reimbursement of costs associated with the Total Claimed
amount below may be affected by the eligibility status of the site (i.e., deductibles, apportionment, etc.), and the documentary validation of incurred costs as reasonable and
necessary expenses per 15A NCAC 2P .0402 and .0404.
DPM
TC
(Initials)
Dan Murphy
ELECTRONIC PREAPPROVAL TASK AUTHORIZATION FORM
Dept of Environmental Quality - Division of Waste Management
MNA parameters were collected under TA 30, and can be used to calibrate the model.
09/30/2021
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT

APPENDIX B
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOGS

GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT

APPENDIX C
LABORATORY REPORT(S) AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION

The electronic signature above is the equivalent of a handwritten signature.
This report shall not be reproduced,except in its entirety,without the written approval of Pace Analytical Services,LLC.
Pace Analytical Services,LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services,Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia,SC 29172
Tel:[phone] Fax:[phone] www.pacelabs.com
Report of Analysis
Crawford Environmental Services
1701 Shenandoah Ave.,NW
Roanoke,VA 24017
Attention:Allison Streams
Project Name:GPM 3089
Project Number:9.0927
Lot Number:WL23054
Date Completed:01/12/2022
Revision Date:01/11/2022
01/13/2022 11:34 AM
Approved and released by:
Project Manager II:Lucas Odom
Page 1 of 21
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES,LLC
SC DHEC No:32010001 NELAC No:E87653 NC DENR No:329 NC Field Parameters No:5639
Pace Analytical Services,LLC (formerly Shealy Environmetal Services,Inc.)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia,SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Case Narrative
Crawford Environmental Services
Lot Number:WL23054
This Report of Analysis contains the analytical result(s)for the sample(s)listed on the Sample Summary
following this Case Narrative.The sample receiving date is documented in the header information
associated with each sample.
All results listed in this report relate only to the samples that are contained within this report.Where
sampling is conducted by the client,results relate to the accuracy of the information provided,and as the
samples are received.
Sample receipt,sample analysis,and data review have been performed in accordance with the most
current approved The NELAC Institute (TNI)standards,the Pace Analytical Services,LLC ("Pace")
Laboratory Quality Manual,standard operating procedures (SOPs),and Pace policies.Any exceptions to
the TNI standards,the Laboratory Quality Manual,SOPs or policies are qualified on the results page or
discussed below.
Pace is a TNI accredited laboratory;however,the following analyses are currently not listed on our TNI
scope of accreditation:Biological Tissue:All,Non-Potable Water:SGT-HEM EPA 1664B,Silica EPA
200.7,Boron,Calcium,Silicon,Strontium EPA 200.8,Bicarbonate,Carbonate,and Hydroxide Alkalinity
SM 2320 B-2011,Fecal Coliform Colilert-18,SM 9221 C E-2006 &SM 9222D-2006,Strontium SW-846
6010D,VOC SM 6200 B-
2011,Drinking Water:VOC (excluding BTEX,MTBE,Naphthalene,&1,2-dichloroethane)EPA 524.2,E.
coli and Total coliforms SM 9223 B-2004,Solid Chemical Material:TOC Walkley-Black.
If you have any questions regarding this report,please contact the Pace Project Manager listed on the
cover page.
This report supersedes all other versions of the same lot number.
Page 2 of 21
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
Sample Summary
Crawford Environmental Services
Lot Number: WL23054

Sample Number Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received
001 12/23/2021 0730MW-2 Aqueous 12/23/2021
002 12/23/2021 0930MW-5 Aqueous 12/23/2021
003 12/23/2021 0820MW-1/1D Aqueous 12/23/2021
004 12/23/2021 0840MW-3R Aqueous 12/23/2021
005 12/23/2021 0900MW-6 Aqueous 12/23/2021
006 12/23/2021 1030WSW-3 Aqueous 12/23/2021
007 12/23/2021 1000WSW-4 Aqueous 12/23/2021
(7 samples)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 3 of 21
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
Detection Summary
Crawford Environmental Services
Lot Number: WL23054

Sample Sample ID Matrix Parameter Method Result Q Units Page
001 MW-2 Aqueous Methyl tertiary butyl ether SM 6200B-0.57 ug/L 5
001 MW-2 Aqueous Lead 6010D 0.095 mg/L 5
002 MW-5 Aqueous Methyl tertiary butyl ether SM 6200B-0.43 J ug/L 6
002 MW-5 Aqueous Lead 6010D 0.062 mg/L 6
003 MW-1/1D Aqueous tert-Amyl methyl ether SM 6200B-0.78 J ug/L 7
003 MW-1/1D Aqueous tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)SM 6200B-12 J ug/L 7
003 MW-1/1D Aqueous Benzene SM 6200B-0.52 ug/L 7
003 MW-1/1D Aqueous Methyl tertiary butyl ether SM 6200B-20 ug/L 7
003 MW-1/1D Aqueous Lead 6010D 0.081 mg/L 7
004 MW-3R Aqueous tert-Amyl alcohol (TAA)SM 6200B-16 J ug/L 8
004 MW-3R Aqueous tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)SM 6200B-60 ug/L 8
004 MW-3R Aqueous Diisopropyl ether (IPE)SM 6200B-4.1 ug/L 8
004 MW-3R Aqueous Methyl tertiary butyl ether SM 6200B-2.9 ug/L 8
004 MW-3R Aqueous m+p - Xylenes SM 6200B-0.43 J ug/L 8
004 MW-3R Aqueous Lead 6010D 0.049 mg/L 8
005 MW-6 Aqueous Lead 6010D 0.0058 J mg/L 9
(16 detections)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 4 of 21
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Crawford Environmental Services
MW-2
WL23054-001
12/23/2021 0730
12/23/2021
Aqueous
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 12/30/2021 1334 JMM2 27103
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
tert-Amyl alcohol (TAA)75-85-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME)994-05-8 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.4010
tert-Butyl formate (TBF)762-75-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L4.05.0
Ethanol 64-17-5 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L40100
Ethyl-tert-butyl ether (ETBE)637-92-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.401.0
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)75-65-0 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 86 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 97 70-130
Toluene-d8 97 70-130
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 01/03/2022 2319 ECB 28142
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Benzene 71-43-2 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)106-93-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Diisopropyl ether (IPE)108-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)1634-04-4 SM 6200B-2011 0.57 1ug/L0.400.50
Naphthalene 91-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Toluene 108-88-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
m+p - Xylenes 179601-23-1 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
o - Xylenes 95-47-6 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 92 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 102 70-130
Toluene-d8 98 70-130
ICP-AES Metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010D 1 12/30/2021 0830 JMH 12/29/2021 0747 26761
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Lead 7439-92-1 6010D 0.095 1mg/L0.00470.010
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 5 of 21
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Crawford Environmental Services
MW-5
WL23054-002
12/23/2021 0930
12/23/2021
Aqueous
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 12/30/2021 1359 JMM2 27103
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
tert-Amyl alcohol (TAA)75-85-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME)994-05-8 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.4010
tert-Butyl formate (TBF)762-75-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L4.05.0
Ethanol 64-17-5 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L40100
Ethyl-tert-butyl ether (ETBE)637-92-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.401.0
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)75-65-0 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 87 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 95 70-130
Toluene-d8 96 70-130
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 01/03/2022 2343 ECB 28142
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Benzene 71-43-2 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)106-93-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Diisopropyl ether (IPE)108-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)1634-04-4 SM 6200B-2011 0.43 J 1ug/L0.400.50
Naphthalene 91-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Toluene 108-88-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
m+p - Xylenes 179601-23-1 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
o - Xylenes 95-47-6 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 90 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 97 70-130
Toluene-d8 94 70-130
ICP-AES Metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010D 1 12/30/2021 0834 JMH 12/29/2021 0747 26761
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Lead 7439-92-1 6010D 0.062 1mg/L0.00470.010
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 6 of 21
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Crawford Environmental Services
MW-1/1D
WL23054-003
12/23/2021 0820
12/23/2021
Aqueous
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 12/30/2021 1424 JMM2 27103
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
tert-Amyl alcohol (TAA)75-85-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME)994-05-8 SM 6200B-2011 0.78 J 1ug/L0.4010
tert-Butyl formate (TBF)762-75-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L4.05.0
Ethanol 64-17-5 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L40100
Ethyl-tert-butyl ether (ETBE)637-92-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.401.0
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)75-65-0 SM 6200B-2011 12 J 1ug/L8.020
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 85 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 97 70-130
Toluene-d8 98 70-130
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 01/04/2022 0008 ECB 28142
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Benzene 71-43-2 SM 6200B-2011 0.52 1ug/L0.400.50
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)106-93-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Diisopropyl ether (IPE)108-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)1634-04-4 SM 6200B-2011 20 1ug/L0.400.50
Naphthalene 91-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Toluene 108-88-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
m+p - Xylenes 179601-23-1 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
o - Xylenes 95-47-6 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 96 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 104 70-130
Toluene-d8 99 70-130
ICP-AES Metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010D 1 12/30/2021 0838 JMH 12/29/2021 0747 26761
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Lead 7439-92-1 6010D 0.081 1mg/L0.00470.010
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 7 of 21
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Crawford Environmental Services
MW-3R
WL23054-004
12/23/2021 0840
12/23/2021
Aqueous
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 12/30/2021 1449 JMM2 27103
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
tert-Amyl alcohol (TAA)75-85-4 SM 6200B-2011 16 J 1ug/L8.020
tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME)994-05-8 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.4010
tert-Butyl formate (TBF)762-75-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L4.05.0
Ethanol 64-17-5 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L40100
Ethyl-tert-butyl ether (ETBE)637-92-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.401.0
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)75-65-0 SM 6200B-2011 60 1ug/L8.020
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 86 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 98 70-130
Toluene-d8 96 70-130
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 01/04/2022 0032 ECB 28142
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Benzene 71-43-2 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)106-93-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Diisopropyl ether (IPE)108-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 4.1 1ug/L0.400.50
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)1634-04-4 SM 6200B-2011 2.9 1ug/L0.400.50
Naphthalene 91-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Toluene 108-88-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
m+p - Xylenes 179601-23-1 SM 6200B-2011 0.43 J 1ug/L0.400.50
o - Xylenes 95-47-6 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 94 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 106 70-130
Toluene-d8 101 70-130
ICP-AES Metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010D 1 12/30/2021 0842 JMH 12/29/2021 0747 26761
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Lead 7439-92-1 6010D 0.049 1mg/L0.00470.010
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 8 of 21
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Crawford Environmental Services
MW-6
WL23054-005
12/23/2021 0900
12/23/2021
Aqueous
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 12/30/2021 1513 JMM2 27103
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
tert-Amyl alcohol (TAA)75-85-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME)994-05-8 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.4010
tert-Butyl formate (TBF)762-75-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L4.05.0
Ethanol 64-17-5 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L40100
Ethyl-tert-butyl ether (ETBE)637-92-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.401.0
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)75-65-0 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 86 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 97 70-130
Toluene-d8 97 70-130
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 01/04/2022 0057 ECB 28142
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Benzene 71-43-2 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)106-93-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Diisopropyl ether (IPE)108-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)1634-04-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Naphthalene 91-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Toluene 108-88-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
m+p - Xylenes 179601-23-1 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
o - Xylenes 95-47-6 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 96 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 105 70-130
Toluene-d8 101 70-130
ICP-AES Metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010D 1 12/30/2021 0846 JMH 12/29/2021 0747 26761
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Lead 7439-92-1 6010D 0.0058 J 1mg/L0.00470.010
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 9 of 21
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Crawford Environmental Services
WSW-3
WL23054-006
12/23/2021 1030
12/23/2021
Aqueous
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 12/30/2021 1539 JMM2 27103
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
tert-Amyl alcohol (TAA)75-85-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME)994-05-8 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.4010
tert-Butyl formate (TBF)762-75-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L4.05.0
Ethanol 64-17-5 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L40100
Ethyl-tert-butyl ether (ETBE)637-92-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.401.0
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)75-65-0 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 86 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 99 70-130
Toluene-d8 97 70-130
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 01/04/2022 0121 ECB 28142
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Benzene 71-43-2 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)106-93-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Diisopropyl ether (IPE)108-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)1634-04-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Naphthalene 91-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Toluene 108-88-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
m+p - Xylenes 179601-23-1 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
o - Xylenes 95-47-6 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 89 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 97 70-130
Toluene-d8 95 70-130
ICP-AES Metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010D 1 12/30/2021 0850 JMH 12/29/2021 0747 26761
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Lead 7439-92-1 6010D ND 1mg/L0.00470.010
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 10 of 21
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Crawford Environmental Services
WSW-4
WL23054-007
12/23/2021 1000
12/23/2021
Aqueous
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 12/30/2021 1604 JMM2 27103
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
tert-Amyl alcohol (TAA)75-85-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME)994-05-8 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.4010
tert-Butyl formate (TBF)762-75-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L4.05.0
Ethanol 64-17-5 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L40100
Ethyl-tert-butyl ether (ETBE)637-92-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.401.0
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)75-65-0 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L8.020
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 87 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 99 70-130
Toluene-d8 98 70-130
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 SM 6200B-SM 6200B-2011 1 01/04/2022 0146 ECB 28142
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Benzene 71-43-2 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)106-93-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Diisopropyl ether (IPE)108-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)1634-04-4 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Naphthalene 91-20-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
Toluene 108-88-3 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
m+p - Xylenes 179601-23-1 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
o - Xylenes 95-47-6 SM 6200B-2011 ND 1ug/L0.400.50
AcceptanceRun 1
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 94 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 102 70-130
Toluene-d8 98 70-130
ICP-AES Metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010D 1 12/30/2021 0854 JMH 12/29/2021 0747 26761
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Lead 7439-92-1 6010D ND 1mg/L0.00470.010
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
Q = Surrogate failure
L = LCS/LCSD failure
S = MS/MSD failure
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 11 of 21
QC Summary
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 12 of 21
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - MB
Batch:Prep Method:
Sample ID:WQ27103-001
27103 SM 6200B-2011
Analytical Method:SM 6200B-2011
Matrix:Aqueous
Parameter Result Q LOQ DL Units Analysis DateDil
tert-Amyl alcohol (TAA)ND 12/30/2021 1121208.0 ug/L1
tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME)ND 12/30/2021 1121100.40 ug/L1
tert-Butyl formate (TBF)ND 12/30/2021 11215.0 4.0 ug/L1
Ethanol ND 12/30/2021 112110040ug/L1
Ethyl-tert-butyl ether (ETBE)ND 12/30/2021 11211.0 0.40 ug/L1
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)ND 12/30/2021 1121208.0 ug/L1
Surrogate Q % Rec
Acceptance
Limit
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 84 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 95 70-130
Toluene-d8 97 70-130
Note:Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the DL
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
+ = RPD is out of criteria
_DL = Detection Limit
* = RSD is out of criteria
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 13 of 21
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - LCS
Batch:Prep Method:
Sample ID:WQ27103-002
27103 SM 6200B-2011
Analytical Method:SM 6200B-2011
Matrix:Aqueous
Parameter
Result
Q % Rec
Spike
Amount
Analysis Date
%Rec
LimitDil(ug/L)(ug/L)
tert-Amyl alcohol (TAA)1100 12/30/2021 1011111100070-1301
tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME)50 12/30/2021 10111005070-1301
tert-Butyl formate (TBF)190 12/30/2021 10117725070-1301
Ethanol 4900 12/30/2021 101197500040-1401
Ethyl-tert-butyl ether (ETBE)46 12/30/2021 1011925070-1301
tert-butyl alcohol (TBA)1000 12/30/2021 1011102100070-1301
Surrogate Q % Rec
Acceptance
Limit
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 96 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 103 70-130
Toluene-d8 105 70-130
Note:Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the DL
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
+ = RPD is out of criteria
_DL = Detection Limit
* = RSD is out of criteria
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 14 of 21
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - MB
Batch:Prep Method:
Sample ID:XQ28142-001
28142 SM 6200B-2011
Analytical Method:SM 6200B-2011
Matrix:Aqueous
Parameter Result Q LOQ DL Units Analysis DateDil
Benzene ND 01/03/2022 21160.50 0.40 ug/L1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND 01/03/2022 21160.50 0.40 ug/L1
Diisopropyl ether (IPE)ND 01/03/2022 21160.50 0.40 ug/L1
Ethylbenzene ND 01/03/2022 21160.50 0.40 ug/L1
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)ND 01/03/2022 21160.50 0.40 ug/L1
Naphthalene ND 01/03/2022 21160.50 0.40 ug/L1
Toluene ND 01/03/2022 21160.50 0.40 ug/L1
m+p - Xylenes ND 01/03/2022 21160.50 0.40 ug/L1
o - Xylenes ND 01/03/2022 21160.50 0.40 ug/L1
Surrogate Q % Rec
Acceptance
Limit
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 94 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 105 70-130
Toluene-d8 99 70-130
Note:Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the DL
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
+ = RPD is out of criteria
_DL = Detection Limit
* = RSD is out of criteria
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 15 of 21
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - LCS
Batch:Prep Method:
Sample ID:XQ28142-002
28142 SM 6200B-2011
Analytical Method:SM 6200B-2011
Matrix:Aqueous
Parameter
Result
Q % Rec
Spike
Amount
Analysis Date
%Rec
LimitDil(ug/L)(ug/L)
Benzene 47 01/03/2022 2003945070-1301
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)47 01/03/2022 2003935070-1301
Diisopropyl ether (IPE)46 01/03/2022 2003925070-1301
Ethylbenzene 46 01/03/2022 2003935070-1301
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)50 01/03/2022 20031005070-1301
Naphthalene 57 01/03/2022 20031145050-1401
Toluene 47 01/03/2022 2003955070-1301
m+p - Xylenes 47 01/03/2022 2003945070-1301
o - Xylenes 49 01/03/2022 2003975070-1301
Surrogate Q % Rec
Acceptance
Limit
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 79 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 87 70-130
Toluene-d8 83 70-130
Note:Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the DL
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
+ = RPD is out of criteria
_DL = Detection Limit
* = RSD is out of criteria
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 16 of 21
ICP-AES Metals - MB
Batch:Prep Method:
Prep Date:
Sample ID:WQ26761-001
26761 3005A
12/29/2021 0747Analytical Method:6010D
Matrix:Aqueous
Parameter Result Q LOQ DL Units Analysis DateDil
Lead ND 12/30/2021 06340.010 0.0047 mg/L1
Note:Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the DL
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
+ = RPD is out of criteria
_DL = Detection Limit
* = RSD is out of criteria
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 17 of 21
ICP-AES Metals - LCS
Batch:Prep Method:
Prep Date:
Sample ID:WQ26761-002
26761 3005A
12/29/2021 0747Analytical Method:6010D
Matrix:Aqueous
Parameter
Result
Q % Rec
Spike
Amount
Analysis Date
%Rec
LimitDil(mg/L)(mg/L)
Lead 0.39 12/30/2021 0645970.40 80-1201
Note:Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the DL
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
+ = RPD is out of criteria
_DL = Detection Limit
* = RSD is out of criteria
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 18 of 21
Chain of Custody
and
Miscellaneous Documents
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 19 of 21
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC

106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 20 of 21
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC

106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 21 of 21
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT GPM 3089-D (FORMER SCOTCHMAN #89) BANNER ELK, NORTH CAROLINA INCIDENT # 28327

GPM 3089 (SCOTCHMAN #89): GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT

APPENDIX D
HYDROGRAPH

88.00
88.50
89.00
89.50
90.00
90.50
91.00
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
6/25/2013 12/8/2014 1/26/2016 10/19/2017 12/6/2018 12/4/2019 1/12/2021 12/23/2021
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

(
u
g
/
L
)
Date
MW-3R
Benzene & Groundwater Elevation vs Time
Benzene 2L Standard Groundwater Elevation Average Groundwater Elevation