RA-2173_13145_CA_MRP_20231115

ENVIRONMENTAL | CIVIL | GEOTECHNICAL

MONITORING REPORT TACKETT RESIDENCE 13117 US HIGHWAY 501 ROUGEMONT, DURHAM COUNTY, NC NCDEQ INCIDENT NO. 13145 RISK CLASSIFICATION: HIGH

NOVEMBER 15, 2023 NCDEQ CONTRACT NO. N70522-A TASK AUTHORIZATION NO. 01 CATLIN PROJECT NO. 221052 PREPARED FOR: MR. MARK PETERMANN NCDEQ, DWM, UST SECTION 1646 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NC 27699-1646 PREPARED BY: CATLIN ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS 220 OLD DAIRY ROAD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 [phone]
CORPORATE LICENSURE NO. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES C-0585
CORPORATE LICENSURE NO. FOR GEOLOGY SERVICES C-118

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 SITE INFORMATION 1
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2
4.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION 3
4.1 UST OWNER AND OPERATOR INFORMATION 3 4.2 UST INFORMATION 3 4.3 CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY 4 4.4 SITE CHARACTERISTICS 4 4.5 OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS OF ADJOINING/NEARBY PROPERTIES AND LAND USE 4 4.6 RECEPTOR INFORMATION 4 4.7 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES 5
5.0 REGIONAL AND SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 7
5.1 SOIL AND BEDROCK 7
5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY 7
6.0 SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION 7
6.1 GROUNDWATER GAUGING DATA 7 6.2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA 8 6.3 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER INFORMATION 9 6.4 EVALUATION OF ASSESSMENT INFORMATION 10
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10
8.0 LIMITATIONS 11
9.0 STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATION 11
10.0 REFERENCES 12

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023
TABLES
TABLE 1 SITE HISTORY – UST SYSTEM AND OTHER RELEASE INFORMATION
TABLE 2 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS AND OTHER RECEPTOR INFORMATION
TABLE 3 WELL CONSTRUCTION AND HISTORICAL WATER LEVEL GAUGING DATA
TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS – STANDARD METHOD 6200B
TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS – STANDARD METHOD 6200B
TABLE 6 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS – EPA METHOD 625
TABLE 7 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS – MADEP EPH AND VPH ANALYTICAL FRACTIONS
FIGURES FIGURE 1 SITE VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 2 POTENTIAL RECEPTOR MAP
FIGURE 3 SITE MAP
FIGURE 4 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION – SEPTEMBER 27, 2023
FIGURE 5 MONITORING WELL GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS – SEPTEMBER 27, 2023
FIGURE 6 ESTIMATED HORIZONTAL EXTENT OF BENZENE – SEPTEMBER 27, 2023
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL DATA
APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX C DAILY ACTIVITIES LOG AND FIELD DATA SHEETS
APPENDIX D LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENT

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 1 November 2023
1.0 SITE INFORMATION
Site Identification
Date: 11/15/23 Site Risk/Priority Rank: High
UST Number: RA-2173 Incident Number: 13145
Site Name: Tackett Residence Facility ID: Unknown
Site Location: 13117 US Highway 501
Nearest City/Town: Rougemont County: Durham
Description of Geographical Data Point: Former UST basin
Location Method: Google Earth
Latitude (decimal degrees): 36.221213° Longitude (decimal degrees): -78.927222°
Contacts Information
UST Owner: Mr. Wilkenson (Deceased)
Address: N/A Phone: N/A
UST Operator: Mr. Wilkenson (Deceased)
Address: N/A Phone: N/A
Property Owner: Miguel Antonio Lopez-Martinez
Address: 101 Jordan Trail, Rougemont, NC Phone: Unknown
Property Occupant: Unknown
Address: 13117 N. Roxboro Rd., Rougemont, NC Phone: Unknown
Consultant: CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
Address: 220 Old Dairy Rd., Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone: [phone]
Corporate Licensure No. For Engineering Services: C-0585
Corporate Geology License No.: C-118
Analytical Laboratory: Con-Test Analytical Laboratory State Certification: NC 652, NC-DW 25703
Address: 39 Spruce St., E. Longmeadow, MA 01028 Phone: [phone]
Release Information
Date Discovered: August 1994
Estimated Quantity of Release: Unknown
Cause of Release: Leak in the UST system
Source of Release: UST system or associated fitting(s)
Sizes and contents of UST system(s) from which the release occurred:
• One 550-gallon gasoline UST
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 2 November 2023
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Tackett Residence site is located at 13117 US Highway 501 (aka North
Roxboro Road), Rougemont, Durham County, North Carolina. One 550-gallon
gasoline underground storage tank (UST) was previously operated on the adjacent
property located at 13121 North Roxboro Road and was removed in 1996. A
petroleum release was discovered in 1994 during groundwater investigation
activities in the site vicinity.

The purpose of this report is to document the latest groundwater monitoring event at
the site. On September 27, 2023, CATLIN Engineers and Scientists (CATLIN)
personnel arrived on site to gauge and collect groundwater samples from monitoring
wells MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03. Groundwater was measured at approximately
5.8 feet deep across the site. Based on these gauging results, the groundwater flow
direction was calculated to be towards the southwest. Groundwater samples were
collected from the three monitoring wells and were submitted for volatile organic
compound (VOC) analysis via Standard Method (SM) 6200B plus ethylene
dibromide (EDB), methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and diisopropyl ether (DIPE).

Laboratory results did not indicate any dissolved petroleum constituents above their
respective laboratory method detection limits (MDLs) in the groundwater sample
from MW-03. Multiple VOCs were detected in the MW-01 and MW-02 samples at
concentrations greater than those established in Title 15A of the North Carolina
Administrative Code, Subchapter 2L, Section .0202 Groundwater Quality Standards
(2L GWQS), but below the Gross Contaminant Levels (GCL).

Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) compound
concentrations have increased in the groundwater sample from monitoring well
MW-01 and decreased in the sample from MW-02 since November 2022 (CATLIN,
2022B).

CATLIN recommends attempting to gain access to sample WSW-9 and discussing
connecting that parcel to municipal water with the property owner.

3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of services for this report was performed in general accordance with
CATLIN proposal number 221052.01P, dated September 12, 2023. Services were
authorized by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ’s)
Task Authorization (TA) #01, accepted on September 14, 2023, and Contract
Number N70522-A.

The approved scope of services for this Task Authorization included the following
tasks:
• Attempt to obtain Right-of-Access agreements to abandon water supply wells
WSW-8, WSW-10, WSW-14, and WSW-15;
• Gauge and sample three permanent groundwater monitoring wells (MW-01,
MW-02, and MW-03);
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 3 November 2023
• Analyze five water samples (three groundwater wells, one field blank, and
one trip blank) per SM 6200B (including EDB, MTBE, and DIPE); and
• Prepare and submit a monitoring report documenting the findings.

Letters were sent to the water supply well property owners to request their
permission to abandon the noted supply wells. As of the date of this submittal, no
responses have been received. The scope of services was conducted in general
accordance with the approved TA.

4.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION

The Tackett Residence site is located at 13117 US Highway, Rougemont, Durham
County, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2). The former Robinson Store was located at
13121 North Roxboro Road (adjacent to the Tackett Residence). Summarized
available historical sampling data collected by others is provided in Appendix A. Site
photographs are presented in Appendix B.

4.1 UST OWNER AND OPERATOR INFORMATION

The Robinson Store served as a gas station and was located adjacent to the
Tackett Residence. The last known operator of the UST at the Robinson
Store was identified as Mr. Wilkinson, who is deceased. Reported dates of
operation vary. The Pollution Incident/UST Leak Reporting Form submitted in
1994 says that the UST operated from approximately 1948 to the mid-1950s.
Other reports suggest the store could have been operating until the early
1960s (ATEC, 1996; NCDENR, 2010).

The site was accepted into the North Carolina UST Section Trust Fund
Branch State Lead Program in 1995 (NCDENR, 2010).

Available information regarding UST owners and operators is presented in
Table 1.

4.2 UST INFORMATION

Reportedly, one 550-gallon gasoline UST was previously operated at the
Robinson Store. It’s estimated that the tank was installed circa 1948 and
operated until the mid-1950s or early 1960s. The tank was removed from the
site in May 1996 (ATEC, 1996).

Available UST system information is presented in Table 1 and the
approximate former UST basin location is illustrated on Figure 3.

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 4 November 2023
4.3 CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY

A release was discovered at the Tackett Residence during groundwater
investigation activities in the site vicinity that began in August 1994. In
October 1996, benzene was detected in the Tackett water supply well above
its 2L GWQS (NCDENR, 1998). During tank closure activities at the
Robinson Store, soil sample analytical results revealed total petroleum
hydrocarbons (TPH) gasoline range organics (GRO) above State Action
Levels (ATEC, 1996).

4.4 SITE CHARACTERISTICS

The Tackett Residence property is owned by Miguel Antonio Lopez-Martinez
and is a rental property occupied by an unknown resident. The parcel is
comprised of the residence building and grassy areas with scattered trees.
The former Robinson Store parcel is owned by Ms. Helen Bowen and is a
private residence. The parcel contains a house, a shed in the back, and the
former Robinson Store. Site photographs are presented in Appendix B.

4.5 OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS OF ADJOINING/NEARBY PROPERTIES
AND LAND USE

Properties in the site vicinity are mostly residences and forested land. The
site is bound by North Roxboro Road (US Highway 501) to the east.
Residences adjoin the property to the north and south, and a large pond is
located to the west. As mentioned above, the former Robinson Store is
located on the parcel to the north adjacent to the Tackett Residence parcel.

4.6 RECEPTOR INFORMATION

Conducting a receptor survey was outside the scope of this monitoring event.
CATLIN conducted the most recent receptor survey for the Tackett
Residence site in 2021. Pertinent receptor information is summarized below.
Potential receptors are illustrated on Figure 2 and receptor information
obtained from CATLIN (2021) is shown in Table 2.

Based on correspondence with the Durham County Utilities Division, the
Rougemont Water System is supplied by two community wells located at
12403 North Roxboro Road. Forty-six water supply wells have been identified
within 1,500 feet of the site. Within 250 feet of the site, three active non-
potable wells were identified. Ten active potable wells are located within
1,000 feet from the site. The remaining wells were identified as non-potable.

Three surface water bodies are located within 1,500 feet of the site. One
large pond is located 316 feet to the west of the site. The two other ponds are
located between 1,000 and 1,5000 feet from the site.

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 5 November 2023
4.7 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES

Investigation activities for the Tackett Residence site were often reported in
conjunction with two other nearby incidents: Rougemont Foodmart #8
(Incident #6280) and the Former Annie Bowling Property (Incident #17956).
All are in the vicinity of the intersection of North Roxboro Road and Bacon
Road, and all have potentially contributed to the reported groundwater
contamination.

As discussed previously, the release was discovered in August 1994 during
water supply well sampling activities by the Durham County Health
Department (NCDENR, 2010). The water supply well on the Tackett
Residence parcel was impacted with benzene concentrations above
applicable standards. During the sampling of the well, a UST riser vent was
detected in front of the former Robinson Store building on the parcel north of
the Tackett Residence parcel. The tank was removed in May 1996.
Approximately 14 tons of soil were removed during tank closure activities.
Confirmation soil samples from the bottom of the UST excavation pit
reportedly contained TPH GRO concentrations up to 2,000 parts per million
(ppm) (ATEC, 1996).

A monitoring well was installed on the Tackett Residence in 1997 and
groundwater sampling results confirmed petroleum contamination on the
property. In May 1997, the Tackett Residence water supply well was
abandoned, and a new water supply well was installed to a depth of
approximately 302 feet. Because another water supply well in the vicinity
(Harris Residence) was also impacted by petroleum contamination, a water
supply line was installed from the Tackett Residence water supply well to the
Harris Residence. Point of entry (POE) water treatment systems were
installed at several water supply wells in the area including both the Tackett
Residence and the adjacent parcel with the former Robinson store
(NCDENR, 2010). Several of the POE systems were removed in 2014.

No official action plan was published specifically for the Tackett Residence
release. However, a Leaking UST (LUST) action plan was prepared for the
nearby Former Annie Bowling Property (#17956) site in 2008 and an incident
summary for the three connected sites from 2010 included recommendations
for actions going forward. These reports agreed that, due to the multiple
sources and widespread contamination in the area, that the primary actions
going forward would be continuing private water supply well sampling,
maintaining the existing POE filtration systems, and discussing the possibility
for waterline installation with the Durham County Planning Department
(NCDENR, 2008b; NCDENR, 2010).

Multiple water supply well monitoring events have been conducted by various
parties between 1997 and 2008. Through 2004 and 2005, Withers & Ravenel
(W&R) reported that water supply wells WSW-3, WSW-4, WSW-7, WSW-12,
WSW-18, WSW-19, WSW-27, and WSW-28 contained contaminant
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 6 November 2023
concentrations above 2L GWQS (NCDENR, 2008a; W&R, 2004). Health Risk
Evaluations (HREs) were also continually performed, and their results
reported to the property owners (NCDENR, 2008b).

CATLIN conducted a sampling event in April 2022. Three Type II monitoring
wells (MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03) were installed and a soil sample was
collected from each boring at approximately six to eight BLS. Analyses of the
soil samples from MW-01 and MW-02 revealed multiple contaminants above
their Soil-to-Groundwater (STGW) Maximum Soil Contaminant
Concentrations (MSCC). Several VOCs, semi-VOCs, and petroleum
hydrocarbon compounds were reported above their 2L GWQS in the MW-01
and MW-02 groundwater samples. No targeted analytes were above GCL. It
should be noted that the 0-hour depth to water following monitoring well
installation was approximately 18 feet below land surface (BLS); however,
the depth to water during the groundwater sampling event was roughly four
feet BLS. Therefore, the soil samples collected between six and eight feet
BLS may not be indicative of vadose zone soil conditions (CATLIN, 2022A).

On November 1, 2022, CATLIN personnel advanced two soil borings for the
construction of Type I temporary monitoring wells (TMW-04 and TMW-05) to
15 feet BLS. After gauging and sampling, these wells were abandoned. On
November 8, 2022, CATLIN returned to the site to gauge and collect
groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03.
The samples were submitted for VOC analysis via SM 6200B plus EDB,
MTBE, and DIPE. Laboratory results did not indicate any dissolved petroleum
constituents above their respective laboratory reporting limits in the
groundwater samples from MW-03 or TMW-05. Multiple VOCs were detected
in the MW-01 and MW-02 samples at concentrations greater than those
established in the 2L GWQS, but below the GCLs (CATLIN, 2022B).

In November 2022, CATLIN conducted slug tests at monitoring wells MW-01
and MW-02. Slug test analyses resulted in hydraulic conductivities of
0.00001273 centimeter per second (cm/sec) and 0.000008583 cm/sec in
wells MW-01 and MW-02, respectively. The hydraulic conductivities were
utilized to perform predictive modeling to help determine potential impacts of
the benzene and naphthalene from MW-02. Modeling results indicated the
non-compliant benzene and naphthalene plumes should not migrate beyond
approximately 30 feet and 8 feet, respectively. The closest receptor (water
supply well WSW-9) is located 73 feet cross-gradient. Therefore, the model
predicts dissolved contamination from MW-02 should not impact WSW-9.
(CATLIN, 2022B).

A detailed site history prepared by NCDENR and summarized available
historical sampling data from previous consultants are provided in
Appendix A.

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 7 November 2023
5.0 REGIONAL AND SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY

5.1 SOIL AND BEDROCK

As defined in the Geologic Map of North Carolina, published by the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
(1985), the site lies within the Piedmont physiographic province.

The site is underlain by the felsic metavolcanic rock formation within the
Carolina Slate Belt. According to the 1985 Geologic Map of North Carolina,
metamorphosed dacitic to rhyolitic flows, metavolcanic rock, and
metamudstone out crop in the site area.

Boring logs from 2021 monitoring well installations indicate that red and
yellow silt is present to approximately 10 feet BLS. Orange silt with black
streaks was encountered from approximately 10 to 12 feet BLS. Sand was
observed from 15 to 20 feet BLS (CATLIN, 2021).

From the boring logs of temporary monitoring wells TMW-04 and TMW-05, a
layer of brown to orange clayey topsoil directly underlies the site to between
0.2 and 0.5 feet BLS. Orange clay, grading to green or tan, is present to 12
feet BLS. Tan to green silt or clayey silt was observed from 12 to 15 feet
BLS.

5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY

Groundwater - The 2020 Visual Hydrogeologic Framework (VHF) – North
Carolina Hydrogeological Database did not identify sufficient boreholes near
the site to draw a cross-section.

Surface Water – Three surface water bodies (ponds) were identified within
1,500 feet of the site. The ponds appear to be for mostly agricultural use.

6.0 SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION

CATLIN conducted field activities in general accordance with the approved TA and
pre-prepared, site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP). Upon arrival at the site,
potential hazards were evaluated before beginning field work and the safety
meetings are documented on the Daily Activities Log. The Daily Activities Log is
included in Appendix C. Photographs from the site visit are included in Appendix B.

6.1 GROUNDWATER GAUGING DATA

During the September 2023 event, CATLIN personnel measured depth to
water in the monitoring wells using an electronic water interface probe. To
prevent cross contamination, the probe and cabling were decontaminated
according to manufacturer’s recommendations between use in each well.
Gauging data were recorded on an electronic groundwater sampling form
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 8 November 2023
using a tablet device. Gauging procedures were performed in general
accordance with North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) and NCDEQ Guidelines, and EPA Region 4
Operating Procedures.

On September 27, 2023, monitoring wells MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03 were
gauged and depth to water ranged from 5.04 feet below top of casing
(BTOC) (MW-01) to 6.47 feet BTOC (MW-02). Light non-aqueous phase
liquid (LNAPL) was not encountered during this monitoring event. Based on
groundwater elevations calculated for this gauging event, groundwater flow
direction is towards the southwest.

During the April 2022 event, the groundwater flow direction was calculated to
be toward the north. During the November 2022 sampling event, the
groundwater flow direction was calculated to be toward the southwest. Due to
this significant change, CATLIN remobilized to the site in December 2022 to
collect additional gauging data. Based on this gauging event, groundwater
was illustrated toward the east.

Monitoring well gauging results for events conducted by CATLIN are
presented in Table 3. Groundwater elevations are illustrated on Figure 4. The
field data sheets are provided in Appendix C.

6.2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA

Following gauging, the monitoring wells were sampled in general accordance
with NCDENR and NCDEQ Guidelines, and EPA Region 4 Operating
Procedures.

On September 27, 2023, prior to obtaining representative groundwater
samples from MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03, each monitoring well was purged
by removing a minimum of three well volumes using a new, disposable bailer.
Monitoring well groundwater field parameter data were measured at one-
minute intervals using an In-Situ Aqua TROLL 600 Multiparameter Sonde
(Aqua TROLL). Conductivity, pH, oxidation reduction potential (ORP),
dissolved oxygen, and temperature measurements were recorded utilizing
the VuSitu mobile application (version 1.17.12). Groundwater parameter data
were transferred from the VuSitu mobile application to the electronic
groundwater sampling forms. Copies of these field data sheets are available
in Appendix C.

All groundwater samples were collected from the bailers and poured into
appropriate, laboratory-provided, pre-preserved glassware, labeled, and
placed on ice in an insulated cooler.

A field blank was collected by pouring water from a new, sealed gallon of
distilled water directly into laboratory-provided, pre-preserved glassware. The
glassware was labeled and placed on ice in an insulated cooler. A laboratory-
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 9 November 2023
provided trip blank was maintained in the cooler for the duration of the
sampling event.

The groundwater samples, field blank, and trip blank were submitted to Con-
Test Analytical Laboratory (Certification NC 652 and NC-DW 25703) in East
Longmeadow, Massachusetts, under proper chain of custody (COC) protocol
and analyzed per SM 6200B (including EDB, MTBE, and DIPE). The
laboratory analytical data and COC are included in Appendix D.

6.3 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER INFORMATION

Historically, benzene has been above 2L GWQS in the sampled water supply
wells in the site vicinity. A detailed site history prepared by NCDENR and
summarized available historical sampling data are provided in Appendix A.

The latest groundwater sampling laboratory results for SM 6200B analysis
are summarized in Table 4. Historical results for events conducted by
CATLIN are included in Tables 5 through 7. Monitoring well sample analytical
results are illustrated on Figure 5. A copy of the complete laboratory report
and COC documentation are in Appendix D.

Monitoring Wells

During the September 2023 monitoring event, three monitoring well
groundwater samples (MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03) were collected and
submitted for analysis via SM 6200B (including EDB, MTBE, and DIPE).
Laboratory analysis did not detect any dissolved petroleum constituents
above their respective MDLs in the sample from MW-03. No analyte
concentrations were detected above GCL in any of the monitoring well
samples. Analytical results reported the following constituents at
concentrations above their 2L GWQS in samples:
• MW-01: benzene, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloropropane, DIPE, and
naphthalene; and
• MW-02: benzene and naphthalene.

Field Blank and Trip Blank

For the September 2023 samples, analysis of the field blank revealed an
estimated concentration (“J”-value) of acetone, which is a known laboratory
artifact. No additional target analytes were detected.

Laboratory analysis of the trip blank did not detect the presence of any target
analytes.

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 10 November 2023
6.4 EVALUATION OF ASSESSMENT INFORMATION

Extent of Contamination

Several petroleum constituents were detected above their respective 2L
GWQS in the groundwater samples from MW-01 and MW-02. However, no
constituents were reported above GCL.

A summary of monitoring well groundwater sample analytical results is
shown on Figure 5. The estimated horizontal extent of benzene is shown on
Figure 6. The dissolved-phase contaminant groundwater plume is
horizontally delineated to the west and southwest, but not to the north or
east. The plume is not vertically delineated.

Cleanup Levels Achieved

Soil – Approximately 14 tons of soil were removed during UST excavation
activities (ATEC, 1996). Soil samples obtained in April 2022 indicate that
contaminant concentrations are above STGW MSCCs, but below Residential
MSCCs (CATLIN, 2022).

Groundwater – Groundwater contaminant concentrations are above 2L
GWQS, but below GCL at the site.

LNAPL – LNAPL was not measured during this monitoring period. LNAPL
has not been historically observed at the site.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Conclusions

Groundwater monitoring findings for this period are summarized below:
• Three groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells
(MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03) and submitted for analysis for VOCs per SM
6200B plus DIPE, EDB, and MTBE.
• Several contaminants were reported in the MW-01 and MW-02 samples at
concentrations above their 2L GWQS.
• No dissolved petroleum constituents were above their respective laboratory
MDLs in the sample from MW-03.
• BTEX concentrations have increased in MW-01 but decreased in MW-02
since the prior sampling event in November 2022.
• Groundwater flow direction was calculated to be towards the southwest.
• The horizontal extent of groundwater impacts is not defined to the west or
southwest. The vertical extend of groundwater impact is also not defined.

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 11 November 2023
Recommendations

CATLIN recommends attempting to gain access to sample WSW-9 and discussing
connecting that parcel to municipal water with the property owner.

8.0 LIMITATIONS

The groundwater samples analyzed as part of this investigation only provide isolated
data points and may not represent conditions at every location in the project area.
Analyses and conclusions of this report, being based on interpolation between data
points at the project area, may not be completely representative of all site
conditions. Conclusions and recommendations of this investigation and report are
based on the best available data in an effort to comply with current regulatory
requirements.

9.0 STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATION

1 Enter the date the monitoring report was due. November 15, 2023
Will this report be submitted after the established due date?
NO
2 Was any required information from the above template missing from this report?

YES
No cross sections are provided. Adequate subsurface information is not available.
3 If applicable, will any of the proposed attenuation milestones under the schedule approved in the Corrective Action Plan not be met? NA
No CAP has been submitted for this site.
4 Does any known or suspected source zone soil contamination or free product
remain outside of the assessed area that could be inhibiting natural attenuation?
NO
5 Has there been an unexpected increase in contaminant mass sufficient to suggest a potential new release from a separate onsite or offsite source?
NO
6 Certification:
I, Sean J. O’Neil, a Licensed Engineer for CATLIN Engineers and Scientists, do certify that the
information contained in this report is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge.

CATLIN Engineers and Scientists is licensed to practice engineering in North Carolina. The
certification number of the company or corporation is C-0585.

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 12 November 2023
10.0 REFERENCES
ATEC Associates, Inc., Underground Storage Tank Closure Report, Tackett
Residence, 13117 Roxboro Road, Rougemont, North Carolina, NCDEM
#13145-3, ATEC Project No. 35-07-95-00016, July 1996.
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists, Receptor Survey Letter Report, Tackett
Residence, 13117 N. Roxboro Street, Rougemont, North Carolina, Incident Number: 13145, Risk Classification: High, CATLIN Project No. 221052.P,
August 30, 2021.
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists, Monitoring Report, Tackett Residence, 13117
North Roxboro Road, Rougemont, Durham County, North Carolina, NCDEQ
Incident No. 13145, Risk Classification: High, May 27, 2022A.
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists, Monitoring Report, Tackett Residence, 13117
North Roxboro Road, Rougemont, Durham County, North Carolina, NCDEQ
Incident No. 13145, Risk Classification: High, December 22, 2022B.
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A., Letter Report of Environmental Services, Tackett
Water-Supply Well and Water Distribution System Installation, Rougemont, Durham County, North Carolina, DEM Incident No. 13145, Mid-Atlantic
Associates Job No. SLT-96-420, September 12, 1997.
NCDENR, Division of Environmental Management, Groundwater Section, Pollution
Incident/U.S.T. Leak Reporting Form, Incident #13145, January 1994.
NCDENR, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management, Guidelines for Sampling,
December 1, 2013.
NCDENR, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management, Federal Trust Fund Single
Incident Report, August 19, 2008(a).
NCDENR, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Waste Management, LUST Action Plan, Incident
Name: Annie Bowling Property, Incident Number: STF #17956, Rougemont,
Durham County, September 29, 2008(b).
NCDENR, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management, Rougemont Area Incident,
Incident Names: Rougemont Food Mart #8, Virginia Tackett, and Annie
Bowling Properties, Incident Number: STF #’s 6280, 13145, and 17956,
Rougemont, Durham County, April 22, 2010.
NCDENR, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management, Tackett Residence #13145
Commercial Category-A, Durham County, RRO, 1998.
NCDEQ, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management, Corrective Action Guidelines, January 19, 2021.
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 13 November 2023
NCDEQ, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management, Guidelines for Site Checks, Tank Closure, and Initial Response and Abatement, January 19, 2021.
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development,
Geological Map of North Carolina, 1985.
U.S. EPA, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science and Ecosystem Support Division, Athens Georgia, Guidance – Design and Installation of Monitoring Wells, Striggow, B., US. EPA Report No. SESGUID-
101-R0, Effective Date February 18, 2008.
U.S. EPA, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science and Ecosystem Support Division, Athens Georgia, Operating Procedure – Field
Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination at the FEC, Striggow, B., U.S. EPA Report No. SESDPROC-206-R3, Effective Date December 18, 2015.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science and Ecosystem Support Division, Athens Georgia, Operating Procedure – Groundwater Level and Well Depth
Measurement, Striggow, B., U.S. EPA Report No. SESDPROC-105-R3, Effective Date November 3, 2016.
U.S. EPA, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science and
Ecosystem Support Division, Athens Georgia, Operating Procedure –
Groundwater Sampling, Striggow, B., U.S. EPA Report No. SESDPROC-301-R4, Effective Date April 26, 2017.
U.S. EPA, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science and Ecosystem Support Division, Athens Georgia, Operating Procedure – In Situ
Water Quality Monitoring, Chief, Field Services Branch, U.S. EPA Report No. SESDPROC-111-R4, Effective Date March 14, 2018.
Withers & Ravenel, Monitoring Report – April 2004, Rougemont Food Mart #8,
Incident #6280, W&R #202248.0, Tackett Residence, Incident #13145, W&R #202241.0, Bowling Property, Incident #17956, W&R #202246.0, W&R
Contract Number N03001S, May 21, 2004.

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023

TABLES
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 1
SITE HISTORY — UST SYSTEM AND OTHER RELEASE INFORMATION
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
UST ID
Number
Name of
Owner/
Operator
Last
Contents
Previous
Contents
Capacity
(gal)
Construction
Details
Tank
Dimensions
(feet)
Installation
Date
(year)
Date
Removed
(mm/dd/yy)
1 Mr. Wilkenson
(deceased)Gasoline Gasoline 550 Steel 3 x 8 ~1948 05/01/96
Incident
Number
Material
Released
Date of Release
Discovery
13145 Gasoline August 1994
Information obtained from ATEC (1996) and misc. NCDENR documents.~ = Approximate
gal = gallons
Description of the Release
The health department sampled the on-site water supply well in August 1994 and laboratory results revealed
benzene above its 2L GWQS (11.1 µg/L).
~1948 to mid 1950s or early
1960s
Dates of Ownership/
Operation
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T1_Site History
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 2
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
Well ID Property
Address
Durham
County
PIN
Number
Owner Name
(Last, First
Middle)
Owner Mailing
Address Well Use
Connected
to County
Water
Supply?
Distance/
Direction
from
Source
Area (ft.)
Comment
WSW-2 13017 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-18-
4731 Lawton LLC 105 Lawson Farm Rd,
Roxboro, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 765 / SE The house is vacant.
WSW-3 13023 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-18-
3836
Holland, Kenneth
and Shirley
13023 N. Roxboro Rd,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 582 / SE Water meter and well observed.
Well is only used for irrigation.
WSW-4 13107 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-18-
2997 Carroll, Diane C 13115 N. Roxboro Rd,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 390 / SE Resident said he does not use the
well.
WSW-5 13109 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
2170 Cooli LLC 610 Ridge Rd,
Roxboro, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 236 / S
WSW-5 and WSW-7 appear to be
the same well which is actually in
WSW-5 location. Site appears
vacant.
WSW-8 13115 N. Roxboro Rd 0829-01-19-2223 Clarke, Angela W and Thomas D 6519 Cheek Rd, Durham, NC Non-Potable Yes 245 / WSW
Water meter observed. No power
to well. Well depth 180 ft., casing
to 40 ft. 6-inch diameter.
WSW-9 13117 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
1386
Martinez, Miguel A
L
101 Jordan Trail,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 26 / S
Meter and well pump control
house observed. Assumed
potable.
WSW-10 13121 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
1475 Bowen, Helen G 13121 N. Roxboro Rd,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 137 / NW Water meter observed in yard. No
power to well.
WSW-11 13201 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
1577 Bowen, Norma J 13201 N. Roxboro Rd,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 267 / NNW Water meter observed in yard.
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS AND OTHER RECEPTOR INFORMATION
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T2_Receptor Info
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 2
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS AND OTHER RECEPTOR INFORMATION
Well ID Property
Address
Durham
County
PIN
Number
Owner Name
(Last, First MI)
Owner Mailing
Address Well Use
Connected
to County
Water
Supply?
Distance/
Direction
from
Source
Area (ft.)
Comment
WSW-12 13207 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-09-
7840
Locklear, Jason
and Linda
P.O. Box 141,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 533 / NW
Meter and well in yard. Well
appears to be in use, potentially
for irrigation.
WSW-13A 13202 N. Roxboro Rd 0829-01-19-4797 Hunt, Arthur and Linda 13202 N. Roxboro Rd, Rougemont, NC Non-Potable Yes 490 / NW Meter observed in the yard.
WSW-14 13122 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
4586 Dunn, Carrie N 13122 N. Roxboro Rd,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 281 / ENE
Meter observed in the yard. Owner
called and said she has never
used well.
WSW-15 13116 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
5432 James Place LLC 10308 Rougemont Rd,
Bahama, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 232 / E Well and water meter observed.
Well not used per resident.
WSW-16 13112 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
6340
Wilkins, Leonard
and Viola
13104 HWY 501,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 354 / E Meter and well were observed.
Assumed potable.
WSW-18 13100 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-18-
7957
McKellar, Irma and
Maurice
168 Adams Farm Rd,
Roxboro, NC
Non-
Potable No 655 / SE
Well was destroyed. Per neighbor
the well is open and kids throw
things into it often. Meter also
observed.
WSW-19 13016 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-18-
8805 Painter, Cynthia O 13016 Roxboro Rd,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 857 / SE On public water and well has been
closed per resident.
WSW-21 12924 N. Roxboro Rd 0829-01-18-9230 Vinayak Yogi Rougemont LLC 12924 N. Roxboro Rd, Rougemont, NC Non-Potable Yes 1,366 / SE Well observed. Employee thought they were on public water.
WSW-23 114 Red Mountain
Rd
0829-01-28-
1382 Tilley, Janet V 114 Red Mountain Rd,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,304 / SE
Per resident, well water is used for
bathing and washing clothes.
Public water is used also mostly
for cooking.
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T2_Receptor Info
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 2
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS AND OTHER RECEPTOR INFORMATION
Well ID Property
Address
Durham
County
PIN
Number
Owner Name
(Last, First MI)
Owner Mailing
Address Well Use
Connected
to County
Water
Supply?
Distance/
Direction
from
Source
Area (ft.)
Comment
WSW-24 13011 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-18-
3594 Lawson, Mabel 908 Ruby St,
Durham, NC Potable No 902 / SE House appeared vacant. Assumed
potable.
WSW-25 113 Bacon Rd /
108 Bill Poole Rd
0829-01-18-
5039
Chambers, Marion
T
1111 Bacon Rd, Rougemont,
NC Potable No 1,217 / S
Well identified in previous reports.
Unable to verify and assumed potable.
WSW-26 13210 N. Roxboro
Rd
0920-03-10-
2193
Blalock, David and
Ethel
702 Hillsborough Rd,
Timberlake, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 662 / NE Per employee, building is on
public water.
WSW-28 115 Red Mountain
Rd
0829-01-29-
0057 Scaggs, Becky A 5016 Long Leaf Dr,
Durham, NC Potable No 1,125 / SE Well observed. House appeared
vacant. Assumed potable.
WSW-29 206 Bacon Rd 0829-01-18-
0625
Ashley, Donald and
Virginia
206 Bacon Rd,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 782 / SSW Well and water meter observed.
Assumed potable.
WSW-30 209 Bacon Rd 0829-01-08-
8493
Chambers, Marion
L
369 Historic Village Rd,
Roxboro, NC Potable No 991 / SSW Meter and well observed, house
seems vacant. Assumed potable.
WSW-31 205 Bacon Rd 0829-01-18-
0335 Wester, Jessica L 205 Bacon Rd,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 1,039 / SW Well and meter observed.
WSW-32 220 Bacon Rd 0829-01-08-
7811
Christie, Jeremy
and Francis
220 Bacon Rd,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 720 / SW Well and meter observed.
WSW-33 123 Bacon Rd 0829-01-18-
0262
Chambers, Marion
L
125 Bacon Rd,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,093 / S Potable well per resident.
WSW-35 13109 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
2170 Cooli LLC 610 Ridge Rd,
Roxboro, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 332 / S Well on site. Site appears vacant.
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T2_Receptor Info
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 2
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS AND OTHER RECEPTOR INFORMATION
Well ID Property
Address
Durham
County
PIN
Number
Owner Name
(Last, First MI)
Owner Mailing
Address Well Use
Connected
to County
Water
Supply?
Distance/
Direction
from
Source
Area (ft.)
Comment
WSW-36 215 Bacon Rd 0829-01-08-
7467 Davis, Harriet C 215 Bacon Rd,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,029 / SW Water meter and well observed.
Assumed potable.
WSW-37 12911 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-18-
7008 BP Properties LLC 3003 Sharon Church Rd.,
Hillsborough, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 1,333 / SSE Employee was not certain but believed they were only on public
water.
WSW-38 13102 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
7016 Torres, Norma P 13102 N. Roxboro Rd,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 531 / SE
Water meter observed, no one
home. Could not confirm presence
of well.
WSW-39 312 Bacon Rd 0829-01-09-
2466 Canada, Billy F 312 Bacon Rd,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,061 / W Well observed. Public water does
not extend to this property.
WSW-44 119 Garden Path St 0829-01-19-8817 Beasley, Luther and Lonnie 1200 Leon St, Apt A1, Durham, NC Potable No 732 / NE
According to resident at 120
Garden Path St, this well supplies her water. No building at 119
Garden Path.
WSW-46 127 Garden Path
St
0829-01-19-
9983
Beasley, Luther Sr.
Heirs, C/O
Williamson, Ronnie
127 Garden Path St,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 978 / NE Well observed. No public water
available on street.
WSW-47 124 Garden Path
St
0829-01-29-
0830 Parker, Darnell T 45 Blackgum Drive,
Timberlake, NC Potable No 936 / ENE
House on property has collaped.
Uncertain if trailer is vacant or not,
no one answered door. Unable to
confirm presence of well but no
public water access. Assumed potable.
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T2_Receptor Info
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 2
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS AND OTHER RECEPTOR INFORMATION
Well ID Property
Address
Durham
County
PIN
Number
Owner Name
(Last, First MI)
Owner Mailing
Address Well Use
Connected
to County
Water
Supply?
Distance/
Direction
from
Source
Area (ft.)
Comment
WSW-51 13104 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-19-61-
9510
Wilkins, Leonard
and Viola
13104 HWY 501,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 392 / SE Meter and water supply well observed in yard. Per owner, well
does not supply the residence.
WSW-51A 13104 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
6340
Wilkins, Leonard
and Viola
13104 HWY 501,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 354 / E
Meter and well were observed.
Per owner, well is potable and
supplies the residence.
WSW-54 209 Red Mountain
Rd
0829-01-29-
5186
Pergerson,
Leonard and
Jacquelyn
209 Red Mountain Rd,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,438 / SE Well observed and public water
does not extend to this property.
WSW-58 13208 N. Roxboro
Rd
0829-01-19-
4917
Wilson, Diontra and
Tilasha
13208 N. Roxboro St.,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 708 / NE On public water per resident.
Water meter and well observed.
WSW-60 13009
Meadowridge Dr
0829-01-29-
6507 Dale, Kenneth Paul 13009 Meadowridge Dr,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,450 / ENE Well observed and public water
does not extend to this property.
WSW-61 13013
Meadowridge Dr
0829-01-29-
5638
Whitlock Roger and
Marty
13013 Meadowridge Dr,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,417 / ENE Potable per resident. Public water
does not extend to this property.
WSW-62 13015
Meadowridge Dr
0829-01-29-
4891
Blanton, Danny and
Betsy
13015 Meadowridge Dr,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,431 / ENE Well observed and public water
does not extend to this property.
WSW-63 13017
Meadowridge Dr
0829-01-29-
4962
Sparks, Mary;
Blackwell, William
13017 Meadowridge Dr,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,395 / ENE Well observed and public water
does not extend to this property.
WSW-64 13101
Meadowridge Dr
0920-03-20-
5115
Aguilar, Carlos and
Maria
13101 Meadowridge Dr,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,410 / NE Well observed and public water
does not extend to this property.
WSW-65 13105
Meadowridge Dr
0920-03-20-
3265
Sanner, Michael
and Diane
13105 Meadowridge Dr,
Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,447 / NE Well observed and public water
does not extend to this property.
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T2_Receptor Info
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 2
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS AND OTHER RECEPTOR INFORMATION
Well ID Property
Address
Durham
County
PIN
Number
Owner Name
(Last, First MI)
Owner Mailing
Address Well Use
Connected
to County
Water
Supply?
Distance/
Direction
from
Source
Area (ft.)
Comment
WSW-72 307 Bacon Rd 0829-01-08-4124
Daehnrich,
Alexander and
Olesja
307 Bacon Rd,Rougemont, NC Potable No 1,426 / SSW
Survey letter was returned stating
they are on a well 400 feet deep. Location of well on property not
specified. Location estimated.
WSW-73 122 Red Mountain
Rd
0829-01-28-
5328
Hodkin, Kyle and
Christina
122 Red Mountain Rd,
Rougemont, NC
Non-
Potable Yes 1,402 / SE Well and water meter observed on
property.
WSW-74 111 Red Mountain
Rd
0829-01-18-
9694
Rougemont United
Methodist Church
8009 Bunny Rd, Rougemont,
NC
Non-
Potable Yes 995 / SE On public water. Has a well but
resident does not know if it works.
Receptor
ID
Pond 1
Pond 2
Pond 3
ft. = feet
307 Bacon Rd Daehnrich, Alexander and Olesja 1,319 / SW Pond
Spans multiple parcels Lundsford, Gordon/Bowling, JW Estate 316 / W
Location Contact
Distance/
Direction from
Source Area (ft.)
Description
Pond
500 Bacon Rd Ferrell, Douglas and Kristine 1,200 / W Pond
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T2_Receptor Info
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 3
WELL CONSTRUCTION AND HISTORICAL WATER LEVEL GAUGING DATA
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
Well ID
Date
Installed
(mm/dd/yy)
Date Water
Level
Measured
(mm/dd/yy)
Well
Diameter
(inches)
Well
Casing
Depth
(ft. BLS)
Screened
Interval
(x to y ft.
BLS)
Bottom
of Well
(ft. BLS)
Top of
Casing
Elevation
(ft.)
Free-Phase
Product
Thickness*
Depth to
Groundwater
from Top of
Casing (ft.)
Groundwater
Elevation (ft.)Comments
04/13/22 NMT 4.09 94.95 Ɨ
11/08/22 NMT 8.63 90.41
12/02/22 NMT 5.67 93.37
09/27/23 NMT 5.04 94.00
04/13/22 NMT 3.83 96.17 Ɨ
11/08/22 NMT 9.96 90.04
12/02/22 NMT 6.69 93.31
09/27/23 NMT 6.47 93.53
04/13/22 NMT 2.73 95.78 Ɨ
11/08/22 NMT 10.23 88.28
12/02/22 NMT 3.22 95.29 Ɨ
09/27/23 NMT 5.88 92.63
TMW-04 11/01/22 11/01/22 1.0 5.0 5.0-15.0 15.0 NM NMT 8.65 NM
TMW-05 11/01/22 11/01/22 1.0 5.0 5.0-15.0 15.0 NM NMT 8.44 NM
NMT = No Measurable Thickness
NM = Not Measured
Ɨ = Water level was measured above the screened interval.
* = if free-phase product is present in a well, ground water elevation should be calculated by: [top of casing elevation - depth to water]+ [free product thickness x
specific gravity of the fuel type]
ft. BLS = feet Below Land Surface
98.5120.05.0-20.05.02.004/12/22MW-03
4.0 4.0-19.0 19.0 100.00
99.0420.05.0-20.05.0
2.0
2.0
04/11/22MW-02
04/11/22MW-01
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T3_Well Construction & Gauging
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS — STANDARD METHOD 6200B
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
Date
Collected
(mm/dd/yy)
09/27/23 <2.0 250 3.9 5.4 1.5 20 3.8 180 40 63 1.7 170 19 0.36 J 2.8 6.4 4.8 19.0 BMDL
09/27/23 <4.0 77 4.9 4.1 1.0 <0.61 ƚ <0.39 1.6 150 40 3.2 240 27 1.3 3.5 180 77 224 BMDL
09/27/23 2.4 J <0.18 <0.15 <0.13 <0.14 <0.30 <0.19 <0.20 <0.22 <0.15 <0.13 <0.38 <0.12 <0.15 <0.22 <0.20 <0.15 <0.73 BMDL
09/27/23 3.1 J <0.18 <0.15 <0.13 <0.14 <0.30 <0.19 <0.20 <0.22 <0.15 <0.13 <0.38 <0.12 <0.15 <0.22 <0.20 <0.15 <0.73 BMDL
09/27/23 <2.0 <0.18 <0.15 <0.13 <0.14 <0.30 <0.19 <0.20 <0.22 <0.15 <0.13 <0.38 <0.12 <0.15 <0.22 <0.20 <0.15 <0.73 BMDL
All results in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
BMDL = Below Method Detection Limit (refer to analytical report for a complete list of analytes and detection limits)
GCL = Gross Contaminant Level
2L GWQS = NCAC T15A:02L Groundwater Quality Standards
Bold results indicate concentrations above 2L GWQS.
< = Less than Method Detection Limit
ƚ = The Method Detection Limit is above the 2L GWQS.
Well/
Sample ID
MW-03
MW-02
MW-01 All Other SM 6200B AnalytesIsopropylbenzene (Cumene)p-Isopropyltoluene(p-Cymene)Naphthalene n-PropylbenzeneToluene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)Ethylbenzene1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneContaminant of
Concern
AcetoneBenzenen-Butylbenzenesec-Butylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene Styrene 1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneTotal XylenesVaries
Varies
26,100
70
260,000
600
28,500
400
24,100
400
70,000
70
50,000
500
Field Blank
Trip Blank
J = Detected but below the Reporting Limit (lowest calibration standard); result is an estimated concentration (CLP J-Flag).
6,000
6
70,000
70
80,000
600
30,500
70
8,800
70
400
0.4
600
0.6
GCL (µg/L)
2L GWQS (µg/L)
6,000,000
6,000
11,700
25
5,000
1
5,900
70
14,750
70
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T4_GW Results (SM 6200B)
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS — STANDARD METHOD 6200B
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
Date
Collected
(mm/dd/yy)
04/13/22 54 J 740 69 6.2 4.7 J BMDL 31 4.1 J 190 180 38 J 57 4.5 J 14 J 170 32 BMDL 17 110 54 280 BMDL
11/08/22 <4.1 79 <3.2 2.1 2.2 0.68 J 19 3.5 150 11 <2.2 21 0.46 J <2.6 72 7.9 0.58 J 0.50 J 4.1 2.6 15.4 BMDL
09/27/23 <2.0 250 BMDL 3.9 5.4 1.5 20 3.8 180 40 BMDL 63 1.7 BMDL 170 19 0.36 J 2.8 6.4 4.8 19.0 BMDL
04/13/22 100 J 290 160 20 7.6 J BMDL <6.2 ƚ <3.6 ƚ 12 790 <22 88 11 <26 230 100 BMDL 41 750 270 1,340 BMDL
11/08/22 <8.1 180 <6.5 6.1 4.5 1.4 J 7.5 <0.72 ƚ 17 97 <4.5 42 5.5 <5.1 120 28 2.0 J 13 380 110 480 BMDL
09/27/23 <4.0 77 BMDL 4.9 4.1 1.0 <0.61 ƚ <0.39 1.6 150 BMDL 40 3.2 BMDL 240 27 1.3 3.5 180 77 224 BMDL
04/13/22 5.1 J <0.20 <1.6 <0.15 <0.11 BMDL <0.31 <0.18 <0.13 <0.21 <1.1 <0.11 <0.097 <1.3 <0.24 <0.086 BMDL <0.22 <0.20 <0.11 <0.69 BMDL
11/08/22 <2.0 <0.20 <1.6 <0.15 <0.11 <0.13 <0.31 <0.18 <0.13 <0.21 <1.1 <0.11 <0.097 <1.3 <0.24 <0.086 <0.11 <0.22 <0.20 <0.11 <0.69 BMDL
09/27/23 2.4 J <0.18 BMDL <0.15 <0.13 <0.14 <0.30 <0.19 <0.20 <0.22 BMDL <0.15 <0.13 BMDL <0.38 <0.12 <0.15 <0.22 <0.20 <0.15 <0.73 BMDL
All results in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
BMDL = Below Method Detection Limit (refer to analytical report for a complete list of analytes and detection limits)
GCL = Gross Contaminant Level
2L GWQS = NCAC T15A:02L Groundwater Quality Standards
Bold results indicate concentrations above 2L GWQS.
< = Less than Method Detection Limit
ƚ = The Method Detection Limit is above the 2L GWQS.
MW-03
50,000
500
Varies
Varies
J = Detected but below the Reporting Limit (lowest calibration standard); result is an estimated concentration (CLP J-Flag).
28,500
400
24,100
400
600
0.6
GCL (µg/L)
2L GWQS (µg/L)
6,000,000
6,000
14,750
70
14,750
70
5,000
1
4,000,000
4,000
5,900
70
8,800
70
400
0.4
100,000
100
6,000
6
26,100
70
260,000
600
70,000
70
80,000
600
40,000
40
30,500
70
11,700
25 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneTotal XylenesAll Other SM 6200B AnalytesWell/
Sample ID
n-PropylbenzeneToluene sec-Butylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene Styrene Naphthalene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloropropane Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)Ethylbenzene2-Hexanone (MBK)MW-02
MW-01 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)p-Isopropyltoluene(p-Cymene)4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)Contaminant of
Concern
AcetoneBenzene2-Butanone (MEK)n-ButylbenzeneNCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T5_Historical GW (SM 6200B)
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 6
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
Date
Collected
04/13/22 <0.420 1.95 J 166 30.7 1.96 J BMDL
04/13/22 0.553 J <0.747 208 53.1 0.596 J BMDL
04/13/22 <0.418 <0.702 <0.615 <0.691 <0.457 BMDL
All results in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
EPA = Environmental Protection Agency
BMDL = Below Method Detection Limit
2L GWQS = NCAC T15A:02L Groundwater Quality StandardsBold results indicate concentrations above 2L GWQS.
GCL = Gross Contaminant Level
< = Less than Method Detection Limit
NE = Not EstablishedJ = Detected but below the Reporting Limit (lowest calibration standard); therefore, result is
an estimated concentration (CLP J-Flag).
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY
RESULTS - EPA METHOD 625
MW-03 All Other EPA 625 AnalytesVaries
Varies
12,000
30
NE
NE
NE
NE
100,000
100
6,000
6
MW-01
MW-02
GCL (µg/L)
2L GWQS (µg/L) Diethylphthalate2,4-DimethylphenolNaphthalene2-Methylnaphthalene3/4-MethylphenolContaminant of
Concern
Well/
Sample
ID
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T6_Historical GW (EPA 625)
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 7
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
Date
Collected
(mm/dd/yy)
04/13/22 <98 <98 190 3,800 <500 1,400 3,800 <598 <98 1,590
04/13/22 140 <100 280 3,600 <1,000 ƚ 3,300 3,600 <1,140 ƚ <100 3,580
04/13/22 <98 <98 <98 <100 <100 <100 <100 <198 <98 <198
All results in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
MADEP = Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
EPH = Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon
VPH = Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon
BMDL = Below Method Detection Limit
2L GWQS = NCAC T15A:02L Groundwater Quality Standards
Bold results indicate concentrations above 2L GWQS.
GCL = Gross Contaminant Level
< = Less than Method Detection Limit
NE = Not Established
ƚ = The Method Detection Limit is above the 2L GWQS.
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS - MADEP EPH AND
VPH ANALYTICAL FRACTIONS
NE
200
NE
400
NE
700
NE
200
NE
400
NE
700
NE
10,000
MW-01
MW-02
GCL (µg/L)
2L GWQS (µg/L)
NE
700
NE
10,000
MW-03
NE
200 C9-C10 AromaticsMethod EPH Analytical
Fractions
VPH Analytical
Fractions
Combined MADEP
EPH and VPH Fractions
Contaminant of
Concern
C9-C18 AliphaticsC19-C36 AliphaticsC11-C22 AromaticsC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C12 AliphaticsC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C18 AliphaticsC19-C36 AliphaticsC9-C22 AromaticsWell/
Sample
ID
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.xlsx; T7_Historical GW (MADEP)
CATLIN Project No. 221052
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023

FIGURES
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
1SITE VICINITY MAP
SITE LOCATIONUS HWY
5
0
1R E D M O U N T A I N R D
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
2,000 0 2,000 4,0001,000
Feet
³
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY13145221052NOV 2023 AS SHOWN KMC/SJO
TACKETT RESIDENCE13117 US HWY 501ROUGEMONT, NC
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
2POTENTIAL RECEPTOR MAP
!(W !(P
!(P!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P !(W !(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
SITE LOCATION
R E D M O U N T A IN R D
1 ,5 0 0 FEET RADIUS
WSW-46
WSW-47WSW-44
WSW-26
WSW-39
WSW-12 WSW-13A
WSW-11
WSW-14
WSW-15WSW-16
WSW-51WSW-38WSW-18
WSW-19
WSW-28
WSW-13B
WSW-27 WSW-43
WSW-50
WSW-49
WSW-48A
WSW-48B
WSW-1
WSW-21
WSW-10
WSW-8
WSW-32
WSW-9
WSW-5 WSW-35WSW-4WSW-3
WSW-2
WSW-24
WSW-37
WSW-25
WSW-33
WSW-42
WSW-31WSW-30
WSW-29
WSW-36US HWY

5
0
1
(
R
OX
BORO RD)
BACON RD
BILL POOLE RD1 ,0 0 0 F E ET RADIUS WSW-65
WSW-64
WSW-63
WSW-62
WSW-61
WSW-60
WSW-56
WSW-55
WSW-59
WSW-57
WSW-75
WSW-54
WSW-73
WSW-23
WSW-58
WSW-74
WSW-72
WSW-41
WSW-67
POND #3
POND #1
POND #2
WSW-68
250 F E ETRADIUSWSW-51AFORMERROBINSONSTORE
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
500 0 500 1,000250
Feet
³
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY13145221052NOV 2023 AS SHOWN KMC/SJO
TACKETT RESIDENCE13117 US HWY 501ROUGEMONT, NC
LEGEND
!(W Active Non-PotableWater Supply Well
!(W Inactive Non-PotableWater Supply Well
NOTES: 1. Well locations were obtained from a field surveyconducted on 7/12/21 and are approximate.2. Wells within a 1,500 feet radius are included in Table 2.
!(P PotableWater Supply Well
!(W
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
3SITE MAP
!(P
!(W
!>
!>!>")!>")!>US HWY
5
0
1
(ROXBORO RD)
MW-01
MW-03
MW-02
WSW-9
WSW-10
TMW-05
TMW-04
FORMER ROBINSON STORE
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
30 0 30 6015
Feet
³
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY13145221052NOV 2023 AS SHOWN KMC/SJO
TACKETT RESIDENCE13117 US HWY 501ROUGEMONT, NC
NOTE: Well and tank locations were obtained from previous reports prepared by other consultants and are approximate.
Parcel Boundary
LEGEND
Monitoring Well
(Type II)!>
!(P Active PotableWater Supply Well
Approximate Location
of Former UST Basin
!(W Inactive Non-PotableWater Supply Well
Temporary Monitoring Well (Type II)")!>
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
4GROUNDWATER ELEVATION –SEPTEMBER 27, 2023
!(W !(P !(P!(P!(W!(W!(W
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W !(P !(P !(P !(P !(P !(P
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!><<US HWY
5
0
1
(ROXBORO RD)
MW-01(94.00)
MW-03(92.63)
MW-02(93.53)
WSW-9
WSW-10 93.5093.25
93.75
93.00
92.75
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
30 0 30 6015
Feet
³
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY13145221052NOV 2023 AS SHOWN KMC/SJO
TACKETT RESIDENCE13117 US HWY 501ROUGEMONT, NC
NOTES: 1. Well and tank locations were obtained from previous reports prepared by other consultants and are approximate.2. The groundwater contour interval is 0.25 feet.
Parcel Boundary
LEGEND
Gauged Monitoring Well (Type II)!>
!(P Active PotableWater Supply Well
Approximate Location of Former UST Basin
!(W Inactive Non-PotableWater Supply Well
Groundwater Contour
GroundwaterElevation (Feet)(##)
Groundwater Flow Direction
<
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
5
MONITORING WELLGROUNDWATER SAMPLEANALYTICAL RESULTS –SEPTEMBER 27, 2023
!(W !(P !(P!(P!(W!(W!(W
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W !(P !(P !(P !(P !(P !(P
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>US HWY
5
0
1
(ROXBORO RD)
MW-01
MW-03 MW-02
WSW-9
WSW-10
???ESTIMATED HORIZONTAL EXTENT OF 2L GWQS EXCEEDANCES
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
30 0 30 6015
Feet
³
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY13145221052NOV 2023 AS SHOWN KMC/SJO
TACKETT RESIDENCE13117 US HWY 501ROUGEMONT, NC
NOTE: Well and tank locations were obtained from previous reports prepared by other consultants and are approximate.
Parcel Boundary
LEGEND
Sampled Monitoring Well (Type II)!>
!(P Active PotableWater Supply Well
Approximate Location of Former UST Basin
!(W Inactive Non-PotableWater Supply Well
DateCollected
09/27/23 250 20 3.8 180 17009/27/23 77 <0.61 ƚ <0.39 1.6 24009/27/23 <0.18 <0.30 <0.19 <0.20 <0.38
All results in micrograms per liter (µg/L).Refer to Table 4 for all results and notes. B old results are above 2L GWQS.
GCL (µg/L)2L GWQS (µg/L) Naphthalene 70,000 70Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)1,2-Dichloroethane 4000.4
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS - SM 6200B
6000.6 6,0006
Incident Name and No.: Tackett Residence - 13145
MW-02MW-03 1,2-Dichloropropane Contaminant of Concern
MW-01
Well/ SampleID
5,0001Benzene
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
6ESTIMATED HORIZONTALEXTENT OF BENZENE –SEPTEMBER 27, 2023
!(W !(P !(P!(P!(W!(W!(W
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W !(P !(P !(P !(P !(P !(P
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>US HWY
5
0
1
(ROXBORO RD)
MW-01(250)
MW-03(<0.18)
MW-02(77)
WSW-9
WSW-10 ???(1)
(10)
(100)
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
30 0 30 6015
Feet
³
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY13145221052NOV 2023 AS SHOWN KMC/SJO
TACKETT RESIDENCE13117 US HWY 501ROUGEMONT, NC
Parcel Boundary
LEGEND
Sampled Monitoring Well (Type II)!>
!(P Active PotableWater Supply Well
Approximate Location of Former UST Basin
!(W Inactive Non-PotableWater Supply Well
NOTES: 1. Well and tank locations were obtained from previous reports prepared by other consultants and are approximate.2. 2L GWQS for Benzene is 1 μg/L.
Benzene Estimated Isoconcentration
Benzene Concentration (μg/L)(##)

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023

APPENDICES

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023

APPENDIX A HISTORICAL DATA
As mentioned above, Figure 1 is included which shows the estimated extent of the current
groundwater impacts. The closest and most heavily impacted private water supply well is
the Talmadge Oakley well and the inlet water quality that is being processed through the
treatment system shows the following water quality condition: 64 ug/L of MTBE and 9.8 IPE.
Virginia Tackett Property
In August 1994, the Department sampled private wells in the vicinity of the Blalocks located
at 13210 US Hwy 501 N. There was a reported release associated with this convenience
mart. Two private water supply wells, Virginia Tackett and Darrell Ellis were sampled. Of
the two wells sampled, only the Tackett well was found to contain petroleum-related
contamination. Based on the testing performed, the Blalock Store was not believed to be
the source of the contamination in the Tackett well. During the sampling of Mr. Ellis' well, a
UST riser vent was observed at a building used by Mr. Ellis as a garage that was
subsequently determined to be a former gas station known as the Robinson Store. The
former owner of the store was deceased. The store was built in the 1940's and operated
until approximately 1960. Based on the sampling results, incident# 13145 was assigned for
the Virginia Tackett property in January 1995. The site property was accepted into the
Department's State Lead program on January 24, 1995.
A site visit and sampling of the Virginia Tackett property was performed in June 1995. The
well was sampled and the results of the lab analysis confirmed the presence of petroleum-
related compounds. Based on the water test results and Health Risk Evaluation by the
State toxicologist, the Department initiated alternate, bottled water service for the property.
Further assessment including a geophysical survey was performed at the Ellis property to
locate the Robinson Store UST in January 1996. In 1997, one monitor well was installed
and sampled, and a new water supply well was installed on the Virginia Tackett property
which also included a Point of Entry (POE) system. Based on the results, one 550-gallon
UST was removed along with contaminated soil. Based on the testing results, the Durham
County Health Department required and supervised the abandonment of the water supply
well.
Following the installation of the new Tackett water supply well, alternate water service,
including either bottled water and/or water line connection to the Tackett well, was provided
to the following residences; 13102 Hwy 501N, 13107 Hwy 501N, 13115 Hwy 501N, 13121
Hwy 501 N, and 13123 Hwy 501 N. At present, Ms. Tackett resides in an assisted living
complex and the residence is vacant. The POE system is no longer in place.
Annie Bowling Property
In the latter part of 1996, based on Department discussions with the area residents,
information was provided that indicated there were two underground storage tanks (USTs)
located on the property formerly owned by Ms. Annie Bowling. The property is adjacent to
and north of the Mindy/Darryl Harris property located at 13107 Hwy 50 lN. A site visit was
made in December 1996 that confirmed the presence of two USTs. The former property
owner, Ms. Frances Gail Tremmel, daughter of Annie Bowling who was deceased, provided
information concerning the historical use of the property. Through discussions with Ms.
Tremmel, the property was formerly used as a store/gas station. According to Ms. Tremmel,
the store/gas station was last used by a Mr. Jaspar Hill until the business was closed in
October 1975. According to Ms. Tremmel the USTs were used to store gasoline but the tank
size was not known. At the time that the USTs were identified (Dec. 1996), the former
store building was being used by the Aircon Refrigeration Company as a commercial HVAC
company. Also, two water supply wells located on the Mindy/Darryl Harris property adjacent
APPENDIX A
HISTORICAL DATA (NCDENR, 2010)
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence
CATLIN Project No. 221052 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
ps;J
Tackett Residence JJ3113 f'ommercial Category-A
Durham County, RRO 13 /&/C
October 1996
On October 8, 1996, the Tackett's water-supply well was sampled. Benzene
concentrations in excess of North Carolina groundwater standards were detected.
Results of the sample were sent to the Tackett residence. A report of activities and
analytical results has been submitted.
November 1996
Water-supply well laboratory analytical results were transmitted to the Tackett
residence on November 8, 1996. Currently attempting to arrange a meeting with area
property owners to discuss a community water-supply well (see Rougemont, Food Mart
#8 site for additional information).
December 1996
Meeting with area residents to discuss the location and other logistics of a community
well has been put on hold until determination of responsible party for two USTs
discovered at a former store located adjacent to and to the north of the Harris residence
(see Rougemont, Food Mart #8 site for additional information).
January 1997
Meeting with area residents to discuss the location and other logistics of a community
well has been put on hold until determination of responsible party for two USTs
discovered at a former store located adjacent to and to the north of the Harris
residence.
February 1997
Currently providing bottled water to Mrs. Virginia Tackett. Evaluating the possibility of
installing a Type Ill water supply well.
March 1997
April1997
Permit was obtained from Durham County Environmental Health Dept. to install a
replacement water-supply well at the Tackett property. Mid-Atlantic met at the site with
Mr. Bob Jordan of that office to site the location of the well. Mid-Atlantic also performed
additional negotiations with Mr. Philip Cates of Durham County Environmental Health
Dept. concerning the construction of the Type Ill well. Durham County would not allow
a double-cased well because annular space requirements could not be met without
excessive cost increase. Therefore, a single-cased, six-inch diameter well was
proposed to be installed in a ten-inch diameter borehole to a depth of 200 feet to satisfy
their requirements. Mid-Atlantic also obtained a signed agreement from Ms. Virginia
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL DATA (NCDENR, 1998)
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence
CATLIN Project No. 221052 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Tackett to install the well on her property.
May 1997
Mid-Atlantic installed a deep water-supply well on Tackett property on May 5 through
May 7, 1997. Water-supply well was 302 feet deep with 175 feet of six-inch casing.
Durham County currently has not approved well construction due to casing material
used. Proposal submitted for the construction of a water-distribution system for the
Tacketts and the Harrises.
June 1997
Mid-Atlantic received authorization to install a water distribution system to supply water
to the Harris and Tackett residences from the new Tackett well. Mid-Atlantic contracted
with an attorney to draft access agreements to cross two properties (Lunsford and
Tremmel) with an underground pipe to carry water to the Harris's. Mid-Atlantic also
obtained an agreement from the Harris's to connect to the well.
July 1997
Mid-Atlantic installed water distribution system (Lee & Sims performed work).
Mid-Atlantic obtained the appropriate building, electrical, and plumbing inspections for
the system.
August 1997
Mid-Atlantic abandoned Tackett's old water-supply well. Mid-Atlantic received
authorization for and completed the installation of a PVC liner and packer within the
new Tackett well to conform with Durham County well construction ordinances.
Mid-Atlantic also obtained a variance for multiple connections to the Tackett well. Well
is now approved by Durham County. Upon completion of activities, landscaping was
restored on four properties by removal of drill cuttings. grading, discing, seeding, and
strawing affected areas.
September 1997
Two driveways were restored by replacing gravel that had been disturbed by trenching
activities. Water was determined to be safe for drinking by Durham County coliform
test. A well water sample collected by Mid-Atlantic exhibited 13 ug/L of toluene (below
NC groundwater standard of 1 ,000 ug/L). DEHNR issued a task authorization for
removal of three drums of purged well water remaining on site.
October 1997
DENR issued a task authorization for additional landscaping restoration at Tackett
residence. Property owner had complained of dirt settling in the backfilled trenches for
underground piping for water distribution system.
November 1997
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence
CATLIN Project No. 221052
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL DATA (NCDENR, 1998)
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
Additional landscaping restoration completed by Newton Landscaping.
December 1997-January 1998
No work was performed at the site during these months.
February 1998
DENR issued TA No. 13145-11 on February 25, 1998 for the installation of one
monitoring well in the former UST location at the Robinson Store. Scope-of-work also
included sampling of the Tackett water-supply well.
March 1998
Mid-Atlantic prepared a right-of-entry agreement for installation of one monitoring well
at the former Robinson store. Mid-Atlantic is currently negotiating with the property
owner, Reid Hodnett, for access to the property. Tackett water-supply well was
sampled March 27, 1998.
April1998
Reid Hodnett has not signed access agreement for installation of monitoring well at the
former Robinson Store. Tackett water-supply well sampling indicated her well water
does not contain petroleum constituents. Ms. Tackett is currently having difficulties
collecting money from Darryl Harris for the power bill to run the water-supply well
system.
May 1998
Reid Hodnett has not signed access agreement for installation of monitoring well at the
former Robinson Store. Ms. Tackett is currently having difficulties collecting money
from Darryl Harris for the power bill to run the water-supply well system.
June 1998
Reid Hodnett has not signed access agreement for installation of monitoring well at the
former Robinson Store. We did not receive any complaints from Ms. Tackett in the
month of June regarding lack of payment from Darryl Harris.
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence
CATLIN Project No. 221052
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL DATA (NCDENR, 1998)
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
APPENDIX A
HISTORICAL DATA (ATEC, 1996)
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence
CATLIN Project No. 221052 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023
POE System Sampling
W&R personnel were onsite on April 13 and April 14, 2004 to collect influent and
effluent samples from the Reid Hodnett (WSW-10) and Talmage Oakley (WSW-19)
POE systems. Prior to sampling, the wells and lines were purged by opening a tap and
allowing them to flow for 20 minutes before sampling. The influent samples from SW-10
and WSW-19 were collected directly from a tap at the wellheads before the POE
system. The effluent samples were collected directly from taps after the POE systems.
Figure 2 presents the locations of the WSW's. Table 1 presents property ownership
information.
The samples were collected directly into laboratory prepared containers, immediately
placed on ice in a cooler and transported under chain of custody to a North Carolina
Certified laboratory for analysis. The samples were analyzed for volatiles by EPA
Method 62300.
Based on the laboratory analytical report, no targeted compounds were identified in the
influent and effluent samples collected from WSW-10. Analytical results of the influent
WSW-19 sample indicated MTBE, 1,2-Dichloropropane, Isopropyl ether and Benzene ~t
concentrations of 140 11g/L, 2.2 119/L, 1011g/L, and 1.8 11g/L, respectively. No targeted
compounds were detected in the effluent sample collected from WSW-19. A copy of the
analytical results is included in Appendix A.
Water Supply Well Sampling
On April 13 and April 14, 2004, W&R personnel collected groundwater samples from
WSWs 2 & 3, WSWs 7 & 8, WSW-11, WSW 13A, 13B, & 14, WSW-18, WSW-21,
WSW-23, and WSWs 25 through 28. Figure 2 presents the locations of the WSWs.
Table 1 presents property ownership information.
Prior to sampling, W&R purged each well by opening a tap and allowed it to flow for
approximately, 15 to 20 minutes. The samples were collected directly into laboratory
prepared containers, immediately placed on ice in a cooler and transported under chain
of custody to a North Carolina Certified laboratory for analysis. The samples were
analyzed for volatiles by EPA Method 62300.
Based on the laboratory analytical report, results of the WSW-3 sample indicated MTBE
at a concentration of 5.4 JLg/L. Analytical results of the WSW-7 sample indicated 1,2-
Dichloroethane at a concentration of 1.2 JLg/L. Analytical results of the WSW-23 sample
indicated Trichloroethane only at a concentration of 1.1 11g/L. Analytical results of the
WSW-25 sample indicated Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chlorodibromomethane
and chloroform at concentrations of 14 JLg/L, 13 JLg/L, 18119/L, and 14 11gtL,
respectively. No targeted compounds were detected in the other WSW well samples. A
copy of the analytical results is included in Appendix A.
APPENDIX A
HISTORICAL DATA (W&R, 2004)
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett ResidenceCATLIN Project No. 221052 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2023

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023

APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS – SEPTEMBER 27, 2023
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023

View of Tackett Residence site.

View of MW-01, facing north.

APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS – SEPTEMBER 27, 2023
NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023

View of MW-02, facing west.

View of MW-03, facing northeast.

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023

APPENDIX C
DAILY ACTIVITIES LOG AND
FIELD DATA SHEETS

CATLIN PROJECT:SAMPLED BY:
CATLIN PROJECT # :DATE SAMPLED:
CLIENT'S NAME:
MW-01 14.96
5.04 2.441
NMT 7.324
20 12.207
2
Method:Bailer Purge Start Time:12:13
Required Bails for 3 Well Volumes:31 Purge Stop Time:12:24
Required Bails for 5 Well Volumes:51 Was Well Purged Dry?No
Number of Bails Removed:31 Sample Time:12:25
Groundwater Removed (gal):7.4
Equipment Used:
Time
Specific
Cond.
(µS/cm)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
pH
(Standard
Units)
ORP
(mV)
Temperature
(Co)
12:13 144.43 3.70 5.51 3.83 54.29
12:14 153.15 1.98 4.14 8.97 55.53
12:15 175.38 2.00 4.23 3.05 55.64
12:16 163.90 2.02 4.42 -2.24 55.55
12:17 172.36 2.23 4.73 -11.25 55.28
12:18 186.32 2.23 5.64 -20.44 54.98
12:19 169.01 2.12 5.78 -26.06 54.77
12:20 221.62 2.11 6.07 -37.15 54.44
12:21 220.79 2.29 6.11 -39.15 54.35
12:22 221.64 2.20 6.16 -42.13 54.22
Laboratory:Con-Test Analysis:
High turbidity; light brown.
Well Data
Well ID
Depth to Product (ft below TOC)
Total Well Depth (ft)
Purging Information Information
Volume of Groundwater in Well
Aqua TROLL 600
Turbidity and Additional
Sampling Notes
6200B
Laboratory Analysis Information
Geochemical Parameters
Depth to Water (ft below TOC)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FORM
Water Column (ft below TOC)
One Well Volume (gal)
Three Well Volumes (gal)
Five Well Volumes (gal)
221052.01
NCDEQ-SLP; Petermann
Monitoring Well Information
N. Newman
9/27/2023
Tackett Residence
Well Diameter (inches)
CATLIN PROJECT:SAMPLED BY:
CATLIN PROJECT # :DATE SAMPLED:
CLIENT'S NAME:
MW-02 12.53
6.47 2.045
NMT 6.135
19 10.224
2
Method:Bailer Purge Start Time:11:57
Required Bails for 3 Well Volumes:26 Purge Stop Time:12:06
Required Bails for 5 Well Volumes:43 Was Well Purged Dry?No
Number of Bails Removed:26 Sample Time:12:06
Groundwater Removed (gal):6.2
Equipment Used:
Time
Specific
Cond.
(µS/cm)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
pH
(Standard
Units)
ORP
(mV)
Temperature
(Co)
11:57 83.62 3.18 5.65 51.47 54.93
11:58 73.24 1.92 4.71 20.41 55.29
11:59 75.31 1.98 5.54 16.12 55.20
12:00 75.39 2.01 5.56 11.88 55.06
12:01 80.37 1.92 5.67 5.98 54.87
12:02 82.12 1.89 5.73 3.43 54.63
12:03 82.49 1.89 5.85 2.97 54.54
12:04 83.08 1.89 5.83 2.02 54.46
Laboratory:Con-Test Analysis:
Depth to Water (ft below TOC)One Well Volume (gal)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FORM
Tackett Residence N. Newman
221052.01 9/27/2023
NCDEQ-SLP; Petermann
Monitoring Well Information
Well Data Volume of Groundwater in Well
Well ID Water Column (ft below TOC)
6200B
Depth to Product (ft below TOC)Three Well Volumes (gal)
Total Well Depth (ft)Five Well Volumes (gal)
Well Diameter (inches)
Purging Information Information
Geochemical Parameters
Aqua TROLL 600
Turbidity and Additional
Sampling Notes
Moderate turbidity; light brown.
Laboratory Analysis Information
CATLIN PROJECT:SAMPLED BY:
CATLIN PROJECT # :DATE SAMPLED:
CLIENT'S NAME:
MW-03 14.12
5.88 2.304
NMT 6.913
20 11.522
2
Method:Bailer Purge Start Time:12:31
Required Bails for 3 Well Volumes:29 Purge Stop Time:12:41
Required Bails for 5 Well Volumes:49 Was Well Purged Dry?No
Number of Bails Removed:29 Sample Time:12:41
Groundwater Removed (gal):7.0
Equipment Used:
Time
Specific
Cond.
(µS/cm)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
pH
(Standard
Units)
ORP
(mV)
Temperature
(Co)
12:30 51.63 3.58 5.78 26.11 53.89
12:31 51.71 2.84 5.58 60.48 54.02
12:32 47.09 2.75 5.67 73.45 53.94
12:33 45.33 2.61 5.71 84.82 53.80
12:34 46.37 2.48 5.80 93.53 53.59
12:35 45.73 2.35 5.95 98.50 53.37
12:36 45.87 2.27 5.99 103.79 53.21
12:37 46.18 2.23 6.07 106.08 53.09
12:38 46.35 2.23 6.06 107.87 53.04
12:39 46.34 2.22 5.98 109.30 53.01
Laboratory:Con-Test Analysis:
Depth to Water (ft below TOC)One Well Volume (gal)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FORM
Tackett Residence N. Newman
221052.01 9/27/2023
NCDEQ-SLP; Petermann
Monitoring Well Information
Well Data Volume of Groundwater in Well
Well ID Water Column (ft below TOC)
6200B
Depth to Product (ft below TOC)Three Well Volumes (gal)
Total Well Depth (ft)Five Well Volumes (gal)
Well Diameter (inches)
Purging Information Information
Geochemical Parameters
Aqua TROLL 600
Turbidity and Additional
Sampling Notes
High turbidity; light brown.
Laboratory Analysis Information

NCDEQ; 13145_Tackett Residence.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221052 November 2023

APPENDIX D
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT AND
CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENT

39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
November 14, 2023
Sean O’Neil
CATLIN Engineers & Scientists
1044 Washington Street
Raleigh, NC 27605
Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Client Job Number:
Project Number: 221052
Laboratory Work Order Number: 23I3807
Enclosed are results of analyses for samples as received by the laboratory on September 28, 2023. If you have any questions
concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kaitlyn A. Feliciano
Project Manager
Table of Contents
Sample Summary 3
Case Narrative 4
Sample Results 5
23I3807-01 5
23I3807-02 7
23I3807-03 9
23I3807-04 11
23I3807-05 13
Sample Preparation Information 15
QC Data 16
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS 16
B353599 16
Flag/Qualifier Summary 20
Certifications 21
Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt 23
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
11/14/2023
CATLIN Engineers & Scientists
1044 Washington Street
Raleigh, NC 27605
ATTN: Sean O’Neil
221052
23I3807
The results of analyses performed on the following samples submitted to CON-TEST, a Pace Analytical Laboratory, are found in this report.
PROJECT LOCATION:
PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
REPORT DATE:
WORK ORDER NUMBER:
FIELD SAMPLE #LAB ID:MATRIX TESTSAMPLE DESCRIPTION SUB LAB
Rougemont, NC
230927-4
MW-01 23I3807-01 Ground Water SM21-23 6200B
MW-02 23I3807-02 Ground Water SM21-23 6200B
MW-03 23I3807-03 Ground Water SM21-23 6200B
FB 23I3807-04 Field Blank SM21-23 6200B
Trip Blank 23I3807-05 Trip Blank Water SM21-23 6200B
[TOC_1]Sample Summary[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
CASE NARRATIVE SUMMARY
All reported results are within defined laboratory quality control objectives unless listed below or otherwise qualified in this report.
For method 6200B elevated reporting limits for sample 23I3807-02 due to high concentrations of target compounds.
REVISED REPORT 11/13/23- Chloromethane added to sample -02
[TOC_1]Case Narrative[TOC]
SM21-23 6200B
Qualifications:
Elevated reporting limit due to high concentration of target compounds.
Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified:
RL-11
23I3807-02[MW-02]
The results of analyses reported only relate to samples submitted to Con-Test, a Pace Analytical Laboratory, for testing.
I certify that the analyses listed above, unless specifically listed as subcontracted, if any, were performed under my direction according to the approved methodologies listed
in this document, and that based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.
Lisa A. Worthington
Technical Representative
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 9/28/2023
Work Order: 23I3807Sample Description:Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Sample ID: 23I3807-01
Field Sample #: MW-01
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 9/27/2023 12:25
[TOC_2]23I3807-01[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L2.0 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Acetone
250 10 10/3/23 6:23 EEHg/L3.7 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B20Benzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromochloromethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromodichloromethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.41 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromoform
ND 2.0 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L1.3 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromomethane
ND 5.0 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L1.7 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Butanone (MEK)
3.9 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1n-Butylbenzene
5.4 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1sec-Butylbenzene
1.5 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chlorobenzene
ND 50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Ethanol
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloroethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloroform
ND 0.60 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.50 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloromethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethane
20 1.0 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
3.8 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.19 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.35 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
180 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
40 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.22 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Ethylbenzene
ND 5.0 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L1.2 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Hexanone (MBK)
63 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
1.7 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 5.0 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.18 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Methylene Chloride
ND 5.0 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L1.3 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
[TOC_1]Sample Results[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 9/28/2023
Work Order: 23I3807Sample Description:Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Sample ID: 23I3807-01
Field Sample #: MW-01
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 9/27/2023 12:25
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
170 10 10/3/23 6:23 EEHg/L7.6 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B20Naphthalene
19 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1n-Propylbenzene
0.36 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1JStyrene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Tetrachloroethylene
2.8 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.22 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Toluene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.19 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichloropropane
6.4 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
4.8 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 20 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L1.7 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Acetate
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.24 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Chloride
8.0 1.0 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.49 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1m+p Xylene
11 0.50 10/3/23 2:53 EEHg/L0.24 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 99.8 10/3/23 2:5370-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 98.9 10/3/23 6:2370-130
Toluene-d8 103 10/3/23 2:5370-130
Toluene-d8 103 10/3/23 6:2370-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 119 10/3/23 2:5370-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 107 10/3/23 6:2370-130
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 9/28/2023
Work Order: 23I3807Sample Description:Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Sample ID: 23I3807-02
Field Sample #: MW-02
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 9/27/2023 12:06
[TOC_2]23I3807-02[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Sample Flags: RL-11 Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 100 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L4.0 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Acetone
77 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.37 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Benzene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Bromobenzene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.57 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Bromochloromethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.32 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Bromodichloromethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.82 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Bromoform
ND 4.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L2.6 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Bromomethane
ND 10 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L3.4 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B22-Butanone (MEK)
4.9 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2n-Butylbenzene
4.1 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.25 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2sec-Butylbenzene
1.0 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2tert-Butylbenzene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.33 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.24 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Chlorobenzene
ND 100 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L41 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Ethanol
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.40 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Chlorodibromomethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.68 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Chloroethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Chloroform
ND 1.2 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L1.0 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Chloromethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.31 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B22-Chlorotoluene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.31 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B24-Chlorotoluene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.32 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.26 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.27 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.26 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.32 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.27 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,1-Dichloroethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.61 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,2-Dichloroethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.39 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,2-Dichloropropane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.23 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,3-Dichloropropane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.70 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B22,2-Dichloropropane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,1-Dichloropropene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.33 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1.6 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.40 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
150 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.44 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Ethylbenzene
ND 10 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L2.4 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B22-Hexanone (MBK)
40 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
3.2 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.25 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 10 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.35 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Methylene Chloride
ND 10 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L2.6 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B24-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 9/28/2023
Work Order: 23I3807Sample Description:Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Sample ID: 23I3807-02
Field Sample #: MW-02
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 9/27/2023 12:06
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Sample Flags: RL-11 Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
240 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.76 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Naphthalene
27 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.25 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2n-Propylbenzene
1.3 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Styrene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.27 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Tetrachloroethylene
3.5 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.45 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Toluene
ND 2.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.68 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.60 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.38 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.35 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Trichloroethylene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.31 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.55 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,2,3-Trichloropropane
180 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.40 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
77 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B21,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 40 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L3.3 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Vinyl Acetate
ND 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.47 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2Vinyl Chloride
190 2.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.98 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2m+p Xylene
34 1.0 10/3/23 3:21 EEHg/L0.49 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B2o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 96.9 10/3/23 3:2170-130
Toluene-d8 102 10/3/23 3:2170-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 109 10/3/23 3:2170-130
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 9/28/2023
Work Order: 23I3807Sample Description:Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Sample ID: 23I3807-03
Field Sample #: MW-03
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 9/27/2023 12:41
[TOC_2]23I3807-03[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
2.4 50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L2.0 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1JAcetone
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.18 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Benzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromochloromethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromodichloromethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.41 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromoform
ND 2.0 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L1.3 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromomethane
ND 5.0 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L1.7 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Butanone (MEK)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1n-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1sec-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chlorobenzene
ND 50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Ethanol
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloroethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloroform
ND 0.60 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.50 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloromethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethane
ND 1.0 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.19 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.35 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.22 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Ethylbenzene
ND 5.0 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L1.2 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Hexanone (MBK)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 5.0 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.18 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Methylene Chloride
ND 5.0 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L1.3 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 9/28/2023
Work Order: 23I3807Sample Description:Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Sample ID: 23I3807-03
Field Sample #: MW-03
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 9/27/2023 12:41
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.38 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Naphthalene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1n-Propylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Styrene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Tetrachloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.22 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Toluene
ND 1.0 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.19 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 20 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L1.7 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Acetate
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.24 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Chloride
ND 1.0 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.49 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1m+p Xylene
ND 0.50 10/3/23 2:26 EEHg/L0.24 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 102 10/3/23 2:2670-130
Toluene-d8 104 10/3/23 2:2670-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 104 10/3/23 2:2670-130
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 9/28/2023
Work Order: 23I3807Sample Description:Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Sample ID: 23I3807-04
Field Sample #: FB
Sample Matrix: Field Blank
Sampled: 9/27/2023 12:50
[TOC_2]23I3807-04[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
3.1 50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L2.0 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1JAcetone
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.18 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Benzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromochloromethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromodichloromethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.41 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromoform
ND 2.0 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L1.3 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromomethane
ND 5.0 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L1.7 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Butanone (MEK)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1n-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1sec-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 1.0 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chlorobenzene
ND 50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Ethanol
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloroethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloroform
ND 0.60 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.50 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloromethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethane
ND 1.0 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.19 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.35 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.22 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Ethylbenzene
ND 5.0 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L1.2 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Hexanone (MBK)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 5.0 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.18 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Methylene Chloride
ND 5.0 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L1.3 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 9/28/2023
Work Order: 23I3807Sample Description:Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Sample ID: 23I3807-04
Field Sample #: FB
Sample Matrix: Field Blank
Sampled: 9/27/2023 12:50
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.38 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Naphthalene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1n-Propylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Styrene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Tetrachloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.22 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Toluene
ND 1.0 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.19 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 20 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L1.7 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Acetate
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.24 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Chloride
ND 1.0 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.49 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1m+p Xylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:14 EEHg/L0.24 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 10/2/23 23:1470-130
Toluene-d8 104 10/2/23 23:1470-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 104 10/2/23 23:1470-130
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 9/28/2023
Work Order: 23I3807Sample Description:Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Sample ID: 23I3807-05
Field Sample #: Trip Blank
Sample Matrix: Trip Blank Water
Sampled: 9/27/2023 00:00
[TOC_2]23I3807-05[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L2.0 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Acetone
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.18 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Benzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromochloromethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromodichloromethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.41 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromoform
ND 2.0 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L1.3 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Bromomethane
ND 5.0 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L1.7 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Butanone (MEK)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1n-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1sec-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 1.0 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chlorobenzene
ND 50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Ethanol
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloroethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloroform
ND 0.60 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.50 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Chloromethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethane
ND 1.0 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.19 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.35 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.16 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.22 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Ethylbenzene
ND 5.0 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L1.2 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B12-Hexanone (MBK)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.13 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 5.0 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.18 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Methylene Chloride
ND 5.0 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L1.3 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 9/28/2023
Work Order: 23I3807Sample Description:Project Location: Rougemont, NC
Sample ID: 23I3807-05
Field Sample #: Trip Blank
Sample Matrix: Trip Blank Water
Sampled: 9/27/2023 00:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.38 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Naphthalene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.12 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1n-Propylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Styrene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.14 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Tetrachloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.22 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Toluene
ND 1.0 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.34 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.30 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.19 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.17 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.28 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.20 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.15 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 20 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L1.7 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Acetate
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.24 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Chloride
ND 1.0 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.49 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1m+p Xylene
ND 0.50 10/2/23 23:41 EEHg/L0.24 10/2/23SM21-23 6200B1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 99.4 10/2/23 23:4170-130
Toluene-d8 104 10/2/23 23:4170-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 104 10/2/23 23:4170-130
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Sample Extraction Data
Prep Method:SW-846 5030B Analytical Method:SM21-23 6200B
Lab Number [Field ID]Batch DateInitial [mL]Final [mL]
B353599 10/02/235 5.0023I3807-01 [MW-01]
B353599 10/02/230.25 5.0023I3807-01RE1 [MW-01]
B353599 10/02/232.5 5.0023I3807-02 [MW-02]
B353599 10/02/235 5.0023I3807-03 [MW-03]
B353599 10/02/235 5.0023I3807-04 [FB]
B353599 10/02/235 5.0023I3807-05 [Trip Blank]
[TOC_1]Sample Preparation Information[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
[TOC_2]Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS[TOC]
Batch B353599 - SW-846 5030B
[TOC_3]B353599[TOC]
Blank (B353599-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/02/23
Acetone g/L50ND
Benzene g/L0.50ND
Bromobenzene g/L0.50ND
Bromochloromethane g/L0.50ND
Bromodichloromethane g/L0.50ND
Bromoform g/L0.50ND
Bromomethane g/L2.0ND
2-Butanone (MEK)g/L5.0ND
n-Butylbenzene g/L0.50ND
sec-Butylbenzene g/L0.50ND
tert-Butylbenzene g/L0.50ND
Carbon Tetrachloride g/L0.50ND
Chlorobenzene g/L0.50ND
Ethanol g/L50ND
Chlorodibromomethane g/L0.50ND
Chloroethane g/L0.50ND
Chloroform g/L0.50ND
Chloromethane g/L0.60ND
2-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50ND
4-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50ND
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)g/L0.50ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)g/L0.50ND
1,1-Dichloroethane g/L0.50ND
1,2-Dichloroethane g/L0.50ND
1,1-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50ND
1,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50ND
1,3-Dichloropropane g/L0.50ND
2,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50ND
1,1-Dichloropropene g/L0.50ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50ND
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50ND
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)g/L0.50ND
Ethylbenzene g/L0.50ND
2-Hexanone (MBK)g/L5.0ND
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)g/L0.50ND
p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)g/L0.50ND
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)g/L0.50ND
Methylene Chloride g/L5.0ND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)g/L5.0ND
Naphthalene g/L0.50ND
n-Propylbenzene g/L0.50ND
Styrene g/L0.50ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane g/L0.50ND
Tetrachloroethylene g/L0.50ND
Toluene g/L0.50ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene g/L1.0ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene g/L0.50ND
[TOC_1]QC Data[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B353599 - SW-846 5030B
Blank (B353599-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/02/23
1,1,1-Trichloroethane g/L0.50ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane g/L0.50ND
Trichloroethylene g/L0.50ND
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)g/L0.50ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane g/L0.50ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50ND
Vinyl Acetate g/L20ND
Vinyl Chloride g/L0.50ND
m+p Xylene g/L1.0ND
o-Xylene g/L0.50ND
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 10025.1
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10426.0
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10325.7
LCS (B353599-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/02/23
Acetone g/L50 100 70-130103103
Benzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010510.5
Bromobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010010.0
Bromochloromethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011311.3
Bromodichloromethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010510.5
Bromoform g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010110.1
Bromomethane g/L2.0 10.0 60-14010510.5
2-Butanone (MEK)g/L5.0 100 70-130111111
n-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13088.48.84
sec-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13087.58.75
tert-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13085.68.56
Carbon Tetrachloride g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011611.6
Chlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13099.09.90
Ethanol g/L50 100 70-13076.376.3
Chlorodibromomethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010710.7
Chloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 60-14011511.5
Chloroform g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010110.1
Chloromethane g/L0.60 10.0 60-14066.46.64
2-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13090.99.09
4-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010210.2
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010910.9
1,2-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13092.99.29
1,3-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13091.69.16
1,4-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13089.68.96
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)g/L0.50 10.0 60-14090.49.04
1,1-Dichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13099.59.95
1,2-Dichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13093.09.30
1,1-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13086.88.68
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010110.1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13096.49.64
1,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010310.3
1,3-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010910.9
2,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13092.19.21
1,1-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13098.79.87
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010210.2
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010210.2
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B353599 - SW-846 5030B
LCS (B353599-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/02/23
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010610.6
Ethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13094.29.42
2-Hexanone (MBK)g/L5.0 100 70-130110110
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13097.79.77
p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13088.58.85
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010710.7
Methylene Chloride g/L5.0 10.0 70-13092.79.27
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)g/L5.0 100 70-130107107
Naphthalene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13091.89.18
n-Propylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13097.29.72
Styrene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13098.69.86
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13098.99.89
Tetrachloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13099.49.94
Toluene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13099.19.91
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene g/L1.0 10.0 70-13091.19.11
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13086.58.65
1,1,1-Trichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13099.19.91
1,1,2-Trichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010910.9
Trichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010010.0
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13094.79.47
1,2,3-Trichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010610.6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13087.88.78
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13097.59.75
Vinyl Acetate g/L20 100 70-13074.874.8
Vinyl Chloride g/L0.50 10.0 60-14077.57.75
m+p Xylene g/L1.0 20.0 70-13098.419.7
o-Xylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010210.2
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 10025.0
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10325.7
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10726.7
LCS Dup (B353599-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/02/23
Acetone g/L50 100 2570-13098.9 3.6998.9
Benzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130110 4.7511.0
Bromobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130105 4.7710.5
Bromochloromethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130117 3.3111.7
Bromodichloromethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130108 3.3710.8
Bromoform g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130103 1.6710.3
Bromomethane g/L2.0 10.0 2560-140108 2.6410.8
2-Butanone (MEK)g/L5.0 100 2570-130112 0.701112
n-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13089.4 1.128.94
sec-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13090.9 3.819.09
tert-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13087.1 1.748.71
Carbon Tetrachloride g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130120 2.8012.0
Chlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130102 2.6910.2
Ethanol g/L50 100 2570-13080.9 5.8980.9
Chlorodibromomethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130114 6.0611.4
Chloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2560-140118 2.6511.8
Chloroform g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130105 3.5010.5
Chloromethane g/L0.60 10.0 2560-14075.1 12.37.51
2-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13095.3 4.739.53
4-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130106 3.8510.6
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B353599 - SW-846 5030B
LCS Dup (B353599-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/02/23
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130113 3.2411.3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13092.7 0.2169.27
1,3-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13095.2 3.859.52
1,4-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13092.7 3.409.27
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)g/L0.50 10.0 2560-14092.8 2.629.28
1,1-Dichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130104 4.6110.4
1,2-Dichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13094.7 1.819.47
1,1-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13088.5 1.948.85
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130104 3.4210.4
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13097.0 0.6209.70
1,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130107 3.7110.7
1,3-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130111 1.2711.1
2,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13094.7 2.789.47
1,1-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130102 3.5810.2
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130108 5.8210.8
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130106 3.8410.6
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130108 1.8810.8
Ethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13095.9 1.799.59
2-Hexanone (MBK)g/L5.0 100 2570-130109 0.830109
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130102 4.0110.2
p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13091.4 3.229.14
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130107 0.74810.7
Methylene Chloride g/L5.0 10.0 2570-13095.7 3.189.57
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)g/L5.0 100 2570-130111 3.05111
Naphthalene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13094.1 2.479.41
n-Propylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130102 4.5210.2
Styrene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130102 3.1910.2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130103 4.3510.3
Tetrachloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130105 5.7610.5
Toluene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130104 4.4410.4
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene g/L1.0 10.0 2570-13095.9 5.139.59
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13089.6 3.528.96
1,1,1-Trichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130103 4.1510.3
1,1,2-Trichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130114 3.9511.4
Trichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130110 9.3111.0
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13097.9 3.329.79
1,2,3-Trichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130107 0.93810.7
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13090.5 3.039.05
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130102 4.8010.2
Vinyl Acetate g/L20 100 2570-13082.3 9.5582.3
Vinyl Chloride g/L0.50 10.0 2560-14075.4 2.757.54
m+p Xylene g/L1.0 20.0 2570-130101 2.5620.2
o-Xylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130104 2.6210.4
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 10225.4
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10426.1
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 10927.3
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
FLAG/QUALIFIER SUMMARY
*QC result is outside of established limits.
Wide recovery limits established for difficult compound.
Wide RPD limits established for difficult compound.
#Data exceeded client recommended or regulatory level
Percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) are determined by the software using values in the
calculation which have not been rounded.
No results have been blank subtracted unless specified in the case narrative section.
RL Reporting Limit is at the level of quantitation (LOQ)
DL Detection Limit is the lower limit of detection determined by the MDL study
MCL Maximum Contaminant Level
ND Not Detected
Detected but below the Reporting Limit (lowest calibration standard); therefore, result is an estimated
concentration (CLP J-Flag).
J
Elevated reporting limit due to high concentration of target compounds.RL-11
[TOC_1]Flag/Qualifier Summary[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
CertificationsAnalyte
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Analyses included in this Report
SM21-23 6200B in Water
NCAcetone
NCBenzene
NCBromobenzene
NCBromochloromethane
NCBromodichloromethane
NCBromoform
NCBromomethane
NC2-Butanone (MEK)
NCn-Butylbenzene
NCsec-Butylbenzene
NCtert-Butylbenzene
NCCarbon Tetrachloride
NCChlorobenzene
NCEthanol
NCChlorodibromomethane
NCChloroethane
NCChloroform
NCChloromethane
NC2-Chlorotoluene
NC4-Chlorotoluene
NC1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
NC1,2-Dichlorobenzene
NC1,3-Dichlorobenzene
NC1,4-Dichlorobenzene
NCDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
NC1,1-Dichloroethane
NC1,2-Dichloroethane
NC1,1-Dichloroethylene
NCcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
NCtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
NC1,2-Dichloropropane
NC1,3-Dichloropropane
NC2,2-Dichloropropane
NC1,1-Dichloropropene
NCcis-1,3-Dichloropropene
NCtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
NCDiisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
NCEthylbenzene
NC2-Hexanone (MBK)
NCIsopropylbenzene (Cumene)
NCp-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
NCMethyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
NCMethylene Chloride
NC4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
NCNaphthalene
NCn-Propylbenzene
NCStyrene
[TOC_1]Certifications[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
CertificationsAnalyte
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Analyses included in this Report
SM21-23 6200B in Water
NC1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
NCTetrachloroethylene
NCToluene
NC1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
NC1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
NC1,1,1-Trichloroethane
NC1,1,2-Trichloroethane
NCTrichloroethylene
NCTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
NC1,2,3-Trichloropropane
NC1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
NC1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
NCVinyl Acetate
NCVinyl Chloride
NCm+p Xylene
NCo-Xylene
Con-Test, a Pace Environmental Laboratory, operates under the following certifications and accreditations:
Code Description Number Expires
652North Carolina Div. of Water QualityNC 12/31/2023