HomeMy WebLinkAboutAS-1152_12170_CA_MRP_20231102_GW Report
CES Group Engineers, LLP
IMPROVING. PROTECTING. RESTORING.
CHARLOTTE, NC
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28273
COLUMBIA, SC
1411 Gervais Street, Suite 140
Columbia, SC 29201
www.ces-group.net
November 2, 2023
Scott Ryals, PE
Environmental Engineer
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
DWM UST Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
RE: Groundwater Monitoring Report
Silver Creek Airport
Incident No.: 12170
UST ID No.: AS-1152
Facility ID No.: 00-0-0000034074
130 Silver Creek Airport Road
Morganton, Burke County, North Carolina 28655
Dear Mr. Ryals:
CES Group Engineers, LLP (CES), while under contract with the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Contract No.: N042023, executed on February 24, 2023, is
submitting this Groundwater Monitoring Report to you electronically via email. The performed
work was authorized by NCDEQ Task Authorization (TA) #01, approved on October 3, 2023.
Should you have any questions regarding this submittal, please do not hesitate to contact me at
(704) 325-5408.
Regards,
Greg Hans, PMP
Environmental Division Manager
Enclosures: Groundwater Monitoring Report
CES Group No.8219.1023E
November 2, 2023
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Silver Creek Airport
130 Silver Creek Airport Road
Morganton, Burke County, North Carolina 28655
NCDEQ Incident No.: 12170
UST ID No.: AS-1152
Facility ID No.: 00-0-0000034074
November 2, 2023
Prepared for:
Mr. Scott Ryals
NCDEQ DWM UST Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Prepared by:
CES Group Engineers, LLP
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
ii
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 SITE INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Identification ........................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Contact Information............................................................................................. 1
1.3 Release Information ............................................................................................ 1
1.4 Certification ......................................................................................................... 2
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES .................................................................................................. 4
4.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION ................................................................ 5
4.1 UST Owner and Operator Information ............................................................... 5
4.2 Underground Storage Tank Information ............................................................. 5
4.3 Non-Underground Storage Tank Information ..................................................... 6
4.4 Release Description ............................................................................................ 6
4.5 Site Characteristics ............................................................................................. 6
4.6 Affected Property Owners and Occupants ......................................................... 6
4.7 Receptor Information .......................................................................................... 7
4.8 Remedial Plan Implementation ........................................................................... 7
4.9 Remediation Progress ........................................................................................ 7
5.0 CURRENT SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ......................................................... 8
5.1 Water Level and Free Product Thickness Measurements ................................. 8
5.2 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Event ................................................... 8
5.3 Surface Water Monitoring and Sampling Event ................................................. 8
5.4 Soil Monitoring and Sampling Event .................................................................. 8
5.5 Summary of Groundwater and Free Product Assessment Information ............. 8
5.6 Site Geology and Hydrogeology ......................................................................... 9
5.7 Evaluation of Groundwater and Free Product Thickness Information ............... 9
5.8 Groundwater Remediation .................................................................................. 9
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 10
6.1 Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 10
6.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................ 10
7.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 11
iii
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN
FIGURE 3 GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION, ELEVATION, AND ESTIMATED
EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION MAP (OCTOBER 2023)
TABLES
TABLE B-1 SITE HISTORY – UST/AST SYSTEM AND OTHER RELEASE
INFORMATION
TABLE B-2 SITE HISTORY – UST/AST OWNER/OPERATOR AND OTHER
RESPONSIBLE PARTY INFORMATION
TABLE B-4 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TABLE B-5 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELL AND OTHER RECEPTOR
INFORMATION
TABLE B-9 CURRENT GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS AND FREE PRODUCT
THICKNESS
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX B MONITORING FIELD DATA SHEET, JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS, AND
HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN
APPENDIX C GROUNDWATER LABORATORY REPORT AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY
RECORDS
iv
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
ACROYNMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AST Aboveground Storage Tank
CES CES Group Engineers, LLP
COC Chain-of-Custody
DTW Depth to Groundwater
DWM Division of Waste Management
EDB Ethylene Dibromide
EPH Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
GCL Gross Contaminant Level
HASP Health and Safety Plan
ID Identification
IPE Isopropyl Ether
JHA Job Hazard Analysis
LNAPL Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid
LSA Limited Site Assessment
MADEP Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
MTBE Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
MW Monitoring Well
N/A Not Applicable
NC North Carolina
NCDEQ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
NORP Notice of Residual Petroleum
PE Professional Engineer
PIN Parcel Identification Number
sVOCs Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
UST Underground Storage Tank
VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds
VPH Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Waypoint Waypoint Analytical, LLC
1
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
1.0 SITE INFORMATION
1.1 Identification
Date of Report: November 2, 2023 Site Risk/Ranking: LOW
Facility ID:00-0-0000034074 UST Incident Number (if known): 12170 / AS-
1152
Site Name: Silver Creek Airport
Street Address:130 Silver Creek Airport Road
City/Town:Morganton Zip Code: 28655 County: Burke
Description of Geographical Data Point (e.g., UST):Approximate Monitoring Wells (MW-1
and MW-2)
Location Method (GPS, topographical map, online map, other):GIS Address Matching
Latitude (decimal degrees):35.728756 Longitude(decimal degrees): -81.732521
1.2 Contact Information
UST/AST Owner: Silver Creek Aviation, Inc. Email: N/A
Address: P.O. Drawer 310, Morganton, NC Tel: N/A
UST/AST Operator: Silver Creek Aviation, Inc. Email: N/A
Address: 44 Silver Creek Airport Road, Morganton,
NC Tel: N/A
Property Owner: Dr. Rocco F. DiSanto Email: drdisanto@gmail.com
Address: 990 3rd Ave SE, Hickory, NC Tel: 828-413-7772
Property Occupant: Silver Creek Airport Email: N/A
Address: 130 Silver Creek Airport Road,
Morganton, NC Tel: N/A
Consultant/Contractor: CES Group Engineers, LLP. Email: ghans@ces-group.net
Address: 3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Ste150,
Charlotte, NC 28273 Tel: 704-325-5408
Analytical Laboratory: Waypoint Analytical
State
Certification
No:
402
Address: 449 Springbrook Road, Charlotte, NC
28217 Tel: 704-529-6364
Drilling Contractor: N/A Email: N/A
Address: N/A Tel: N/A
1.3 Release Information
Date Discovered:
5/19/1994 (According to a review of historical UST files,
records and/or databases)
Estimated Quantity of Release: Unknown
Cause of Release: Unknown
Source of Release (e.g.,
Dispenser/Piping/UST):USTs
Sizes and Contents of Tanks or
Other Containment from which the
Release Occurred:
Three 4,000-gallon gasoline USTs
2
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
1.4 Certification
I, Charles D. Heleine, a North Carolina Licensed Professional Engineer (PE) employed by
CES Group Engineers, LLP (CES), do certify that the information contained in this report is
accurate, to the best of my knowledge.
E-Signature 10/31/2023
Charles D. Heleine, NC PE No. 27196
CES is licensed to practice engineering in North Carolina (license number F-1240).
3
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Groundwater Monitoring Report (GW Report) summarizes petroleum hydrocarbon impacts in
groundwater from an apparent release of petroleum-related constituents from an underground
storage tank (UST or tank) system (removed in March, 1994), located at Silver Creek Airport, 130
Silver Creek Airport Road, Morganton, Burke County, North Carolina (hereafter identified as the
site, subject site, subject property, or property). CES has been authorized to perform groundwater
sampling activities by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ),
represented by Scott Ryals, Professional Engineer.
Three 4,000-gallon gasoline USTs were removed from the site in March, 1994. Subsequent soil
and groundwater assessment and monitoring activities were conducted at the site and reported
petroleum-related constituent concentrations above applicable NCDEQ soil and groundwater
standards from the area of the former tank grave, ie MW-1.
On October 10, 2023, under the direction of CES, a depth to groundwater (DTW) measurement was
recorded from existing monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2, using a water level meter capable of
detecting light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) and free product to an accuracy of 0.01 feet.
Free product was not detected in MW-1 or MW-2. DTW was measured at 8.89-feet below ground
surface (bgs) in MW-1 and 10.03-feet bgs in MW-2. Groundwater samples were then collected
from MW-1 and MW-2 in laboratory provided glassware and vials, placed on ice, and hand
delivered under chain-of-custody (COC) procedures to Waypoint Analytical, LLC (Waypoint) of
Charlotte, North Carolina on October 11, 2023, for laboratory analysis of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) by 6200B including methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)/isopropyl ether
(IPE)/ethylene dibromide (EDB) and sVOCs by 625 base/neutral and acids (BNA).
Groundwater laboratory analytical results from MW-1 and MW-2 reported petroleum-related
constituent concentrations below the NCDEQ 2L Standard and the Gross Contaminant Level
(GCL).
According to information retrieved from the NCDEQ UST Incidents Map, the site was previously
assigned a Low-Risk classification by NCDEQ.
To date, no known receptors have been impacted by the reported petroleum release, nor are any
receptors known to be at an imminent risk of being impacted, based on a limited review of current
groundwater conditions, including contaminant levels and the location of contaminants.
This report provides data necessary to fulfill a GW Report, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2L.0100,
and is formatted in conformance with Appendix A of the Guidelines for Assessment and Corrective
Action for UST Releases, dated June 21, 2023.
Based upon groundwater concentration levels reported below applicable groundwater standards
(NCDEQ 2L Standard and the GCL) from MW-1 and MW-2, and the previously reported Low-Risk
classification, without a foreseeable risk of impacting nearby receptors due to the reported
concentration levels of petroleum-related constituents, and with the historical and future planned
use of the subject property as a privately-owned, non-commercial airport, it is the opinion of CES
that a notice of No Further Action (NFA) can be issued for Incident 12170.
4
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services for this report were authorized by NCDEQ Task Authorization (TA) #01,
approved on October 3, 2023, under CES Contract Number N042023, dated February 24, 2023. In
accordance with the approved TA, the scope of services included the following:
Initial site mobilization to assess the status of existing onsite monitoring wells.
Monitor and collect up to three groundwater samples from existing monitoring wells and a
field blank for laboratory analysis by VOCs by 6200B including MTBE/IPE/EDB and sVOCs
by 625 BNA.
Prepare and submit one GW Report summarizing the field and laboratory analytical findings.
During the groundwater monitoring and sampling event conducted on October 10, 2023, after
further field investigative measures were undertaken to locate additional onsite monitoring wells,
none were located and/or were believed to be destroyed. As a result, the scope of services for this
TA was modified to include the monitoring, sampling, and analysis of two monitoring wells, identified
as MW-1 and MW-2, and included the collection and analysis of one field blank sample.
5
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
4.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION
The subject site is located at 130 Silver Creek Airport Road, Morganton, North Carolina, and
currently operates as a privately-owned, non-commercial airport, and has been further identified as
Morganton County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 1793010262. Figures 1 and 2 depict a Site
Location Map and Site Plan, respectively.
According to an online review of the NCDEQ UST Incidents Map, an incident was reported to
NCDEQ on May 19, 1994, and was subsequently assigned Incident Number 12170, and was further
classified as a Low-Risk site for a regulated (R) and commercial (C) UST system.
4.1 UST Owner and Operator Information
UST Owner: Silver Creek Aviation, Inc.
Address: P.O. Drawer 310, Morganton, North Carolina
Phone: N/A
UST Operator: Silver Creek Aviation, Inc.
Address: 44 Silver Creek Road, Morganton, North Carolina
Phone: N/A
Other Person Associated
With Release: (Site accepted into State-Lead Cleanup Program)
Address: N/A
Phone: N/A
Current Property Owner: Dr. Rocco F. DiSanto
Address: 990 3rd Avenue SE, Hickory, North Carolina
Phone: N/A
On September 18, 2023, the site was accepted into the NCDEQ State-Lead Cleanup Program to
conduct further investigative measures relative to Incident Number 12170.
Additional responsible party information is provided in Table B-1 and Table B-2, and above in
Section 1.2.
4.2 Underground Storage Tank Information
A general summary of the UST system is presented below, with further information included in
Tables B-1 and B-2:
UST ID
Number
Current/Last
Contents
Capacity
(gallons)
Date
Installed
Permanently
Closed/Date Removed
Discovery
of Release
1 Gasoline 4,000 1983 Removed
5/8/1994 Yes
2 Gasoline 4,000 1983 Removed
5/8/1994 Yes
3 Gasoline 4,000 1983 Removed
5/8/1994 Yes
* It should be noted that UST information was retrieved from a Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) Report, prepared
by INENCO, Inc of Davidson, NC, dated June, 1995.
6
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
The approximate locations and orientation of the former USTs are depicted on Figure 2.
4.3 Non-Underground Storage Tank Information
An aboveground storage tank (AST) or other above ground vessels or substantial petroleum
storage containers were previously known to exist at the site, and contained waste oil. The waste
oil was reportedly stored in a shed in the vicinity of the former UST system. The shed was
eventually dismantled, and waste oil storage was relocated and kept in an AST in one of the
airplane hangars.
4.4 Release Description
Based on limited information made available to CES, a release of petroleum-related constituents
occurred from the historical operation of the three onsite 4,000-gallon gasoline USTs (removed in
March, 1994) with impacts to soil and groundwater being identified from the area of the former tank
grave, and MW-1, during a Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA), performed by INENCO, Inc. of
Davidson, NC in June, 1995.
The approximate location of the former USTs and monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 are depicted
on Figure 2.
4.5 Site Characteristics
The subject property is zoned Exclusive Industrial District (EID) in the City of Morganton, and
includes one parcel occupying an area of 37.96 acres. According to the Burke County GIS, land
uses of the subject property, as well as the surrounding properties, have been identified as
industrial and residential uses. Based on site observations, natural surface drainage at the subject
property generally flows in a southern direction. While not always the case, groundwater flow
direction typically follows the direction of surface water flow, and is, therefore, anticipated to flow
southernly. The adjoining properties south and east of the site across Silver Creek are residential
parcels and the adjoining properties to the north and west of the site are industrial parcels.
The subject site is situated at the end of Silver Creek Airport Road, a single lane asphalt surfaced
road. The subject site contains five (5) airplane hangar buildings located on the north portion of the
site. The airplane hangars range between approximately 2,500-square feet and 10,000-square
feet. The remainder of the subject site is covered by landscaped areas and asphalt-pavement
parking areas. The subject site is served by commercial utilities, including electrical power,
telephone, and natural gas services. Public water distribution and sanitary sewer services provided
by the City of Morganton serve the site.
The site location in relation to area land use is illustrated in Figure 1. Site photographs, depicting
key site features, are included in Appendix A.
4.6 Affected Property Owners and Occupants
Based on petroleum-related constituents reported below applicable groundwater standards
(NCDEQ 2L Standard and the GCL), nearby and surrounding property owners and occupants are
not presumed to be impacted by the apparent release from Incident Number 12170.
Groundwater analytical results are included in Table B-4.
7
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
4.7 Receptor Information
Water Supply Wells:
Conducting a water supply well receptor survey was outside the scope of services for this
groundwater monitoring and sampling event. However, no water supply wells were observed onsite,
nor would be expected to be present on nearby or surrounding properties based on land use near
the site.
Public Water Supplies:
According to the NC SWAPInfo 2.0 Map and NC One Map - Public Water Supply Well Resources
Map, no public water supply wells are known to exist within a 1,500-feet radius of the subject
property.
Municipal water distribution systems provided by the City of Morganton are available to serve the
subject property and surrounding properties.
Surface Water:
According to the NC One Map – Surface Water Classifications Map, the nearest surface water body
is Little Silver Creek, located approximately 350-feet to the south-southwest of the site, with Silver
Creek being located approximately 550-feet to the south-southeast of the site.
According to the NC One Map – Surface Water Intakes Map, no surface water intakes are located
within a 1,500-foot radius of the subject site.
Wellhead Protection Areas:
According to the NC SWAP website, and database of approved North Carolina Wellhead Protection
Areas, no wellhead protection areas and/or approved wellhead protection plans are known to exist
within a 1,500-foot radius of the subject site.
Deep Aquifers in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Region:
Not applicable to the subject site, as the site lies within the Piedmont Physiographic Region.
Subsurface Structures:
Underground utilities have been identified at and adjacent to the subject site, and residual soil and
groundwater contamination may be in contact with these underground utilities. Groundwater has
historically been measured approximately 9-feet bgs at the site. Because the underground utilities
are expected to be at a shallower depth than 9-feet, the utility lines would not be considered
receptors or conduits for groundwater contaminant migration.
Table B-5 summarizes public and private water supply well and other receptor information.
4.8 Remedial Plan Implementation
To date, it is the understanding of CES that a remedial plan has not been submitted and/or
implemented for the subject site.
4.9 Remediation Progress
Not applicable.
8
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
5.0 CURRENT SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
Prior to the commencement of the groundwater monitoring and sampling event, CES prepared and
reviewed a site-specific Job Hazards Analysis (JHA) and Emergency Management and Health &
Safety Plan (HASP), acknowledging that potential hazards exist onsite, and were properly
recognized and evaluated by onsite personnel. A copy of the site-specific JHA and HASP are
included in Appendix B.
5.1 Water Level and Free Product Thickness Measurements
During this assessment phase, a DTW measurement was collected from MW-1 and MW-2 on
October 10, 2023, utilizing a water level meter capable of detecting LNAPL and free product to an
accuracy of 0.01 feet.
Free product was not detected in any onsite monitoring wells.
After measuring DTW in MW-1 and MW-2, the water level meter was decontaminated by using a
soapy water mixture (alconox and water).
DTW in MW-1 was 8.89-feet bgs and 10.03-feet bgs in MW-2 on October 10, 2023. Based on
visual observations at the site and surrounding area, groundwater flow direction is anticipated to
flow in a southernly direction towards Little Silver Creek and Silver Creek. A summary of the DTW
measurement is included in Appendix B and on Table B-9.
5.2 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Event
After collecting DTW measurements, and after calculating the volume of water to be removed from
MW-1 and MW-2, a dedicated 1.5-inch disposable bailer was used to purge approximately three to
five well volumes from each monitoring well. Groundwater samples were then collected in
laboratory provided glassware and vials, placed on ice, and hand delivered under COC procedures
to Waypoint on October 11, 2023, for analysis of VOCs by 6200B including MTBE/IPE/EDB and
sVOCs by 625 BNA. Prior to the commencement of the groundwater monitoring and sampling
event, a field blank was collected onsite by pouring deionized water, issued by the laboratory, into
laboratory provided glassware and was also submitted for analysis of the above-referenced
parameters.
5.3 Surface Water Monitoring and Sampling Event
No surface water monitoring events were conducted during this groundwater monitoring and
sampling event.
5.4 Soil Monitoring and Sampling Event
No soil monitoring events were conducted during this groundwater monitoring and sampling event.
5.5 Summary of Groundwater and Free Product Assessment Information
Groundwater laboratory analytical results from the sample collected on October 10, 2023, reported
petroleum-related constituent concentrations below applicable groundwater standards (NCDEQ 2L
Standard and the GCL).
9
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
Figure 2 depicts the location of MW-1 and MW-2. A groundwater concentration, elevation, and
estimated extent of contamination plan is included as Figure 3. A summary of groundwater
analytical results is included on Table B-4. Copies of the groundwater laboratory analytical report
are included as Appendix C.
5.6 Site Geology and Hydrogeology
According to the Geological Map of North Carolina (1985), the subject site is located within the
Piedmont Physiographic Province, is underlain by the metamorphic rocks of the Inner Piedmont,
Chauga Belt, Smith River Allochthon, and Sauratown Mountain Anticlinorium, and is within a
magmatitic granitic gneiss formation. A description of the underlying Rock Unit is OCgm is a
foliated to massive, granitic to quartz dioritic; biotite gneiss and amphibolite common.
According to the US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil
Survey, soils at the subject property consist of Colvard sandy loam (CvA), which generally have 0 to
3 percent slope, and are classified as well drained fine sandy loam (0 to 60-inches) and a gravelly
sand (60 to 80-inches). Parent materials were classified as loamy and sandy alluvium.
Based on groundwater surface elevation, as measured from MW-1 and MW-2 on October 10, 2023,
as summarized in Table B-9, and from site observations relative to the general gradient at the site,
apparent groundwater movement across the site is presumed to flow in a southernly direction. A
groundwater elevation plan for the October 10, 2023, groundwater monitoring and sampling event,
depicting the groundwater elevation and apparent flow direction to the south, is presented as
Figure 3.
5.7 Evaluation of Groundwater and Free Product Thickness Information
Based on petroleum-related constituents detected below applicable groundwater standards
(NCDEQ 2L Standard and the GCL) during the groundwater sampling event conducted on October
10, 2023, groundwater at the site is no longer impacted by the release condition from March, 1994.
Free product was not detected in MW-1 or MW-2.
The data obtained and reported herein is representative of conditions only at the referenced
monitoring well and surface water locations and is not necessarily indicative of conditions elsewhere
on the subject site.
5.8 Groundwater Remediation
No groundwater remediation activities were conducted during this groundwater monitoring and
sampling event.
10
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 Conclusions
The findings of the October 10, 2023, groundwater monitoring and sampling event are as follows:
Two existing groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 and MW-2) were monitored and sampled
for VOCs by 6200B including MTBE/IPE/EDB and sVOCs by 625 BNA.
LNAPL or free product was not detected in MW-1 or MW-2.
DTW in MW-1 was measured at 8.89-feet bgs and 10.03-feet bgs in MW-2.
The apparent groundwater flow direction is to the south.
Petroleum-related constituent concentrations in groundwater were reported below
applicable groundwater standards (NCDEQ 2L Standard and the GCL) in MW-1 and MW-2.
6.2 Recommendations
Based upon groundwater concentration levels reported below applicable groundwater standards
(NCDEQ 2L Standard and the GCL) from MW-1 and MW-2, and the previously reported Low-Risk
classification, without a foreseeable risk of impacting nearby receptors due to the reported
concentration levels of petroleum-related constituents, and with the historical and future planned
use of the subject property as a privately-owned, non-commercial airport, it is the opinion of CES
that a notice of No Further Action (NFA) can be issued for Incident 12170.
However, during any potential and/or future site redevelopment activities, property transactions,
and/or site improvements, it is the recommendation of CES that additional soil, groundwater and
vapor assessment, monitoring and remediation activities be conducted at the site, as the data
obtained and reported herein is representative of conditions only at the referenced monitoring well
locations (MW-1 and MW-2) and is not necessarily indicative of conditions elsewhere on the subject
property.
11
CES Project No. 8220.1023E
November 2, 2023
7.0 REFERENCES
INENCO, Inc., of Davidson, North Carolina. Comprehensive Site Assessment, dated June, 1995.
FIGURES
^_
SITE LOCATION
Drawn on: 10/26/2023
Drawn by: Amy Schmidt
Reviewed by: Matthew Sumner
3525 Whitehall Park DriveSuite 150Charlotte, North Carolina 28273T: 704-489-1500www.ces-group.net³
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000
FEET
REFERENCE:USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP Elevation Program, Geographic Names Information System,National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and National TransportationDataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data; U.S.Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, U.S.Coastal Relief Model. Data refreshed April, 2023.Figure 1Site Location MapSilver Creek Airport130 Silver Creek Airport RoadMorganton, Burke County, North CarolinaCES Project No. 8219.1023E
2
'5$:1%<%1
&+(&.('%<*+
352-(&7180%(5
223(
'5$:,1*7,7/(
6+((7180%(5
6($/
'$7(12'(6&5,37,21
'5$:,1*5(9,6,216352-(&7'(6&5,37,2136LOYHU&UHHN$LUSRUW5RDG0RUJDQWRQ1&6LOYHU&UHHN$LUSRUWSite PlanCES GROUP
ENGINEERS, LLP
NC FIRM LICENSE #F-1240
3525 WHITEHALL PARK DRIVE
SUITE 150
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
T 704. 489.1500
www.ces-group.net
'$7(223
6&$/( 2
6LOYHU&UHHN$LUSRUW5G
0RUJDQWRQ1&
3
'5$:1%<%1
&+(&.('%<*+
352-(&7180%(5
223(
'5$:,1*7,7/(
6+((7180%(5
6($/
'$7(12'(6&5,37,21
'5$:,1*5(9,6,21636LOYHU&UHHN$LUSRUW5RDG0RUJDQWRQ1&6LOYHU&UHHN$LUSRUWGroundwater Concentration and Elevation andEstimated Extent of Contamination Map (October 2023)CES GROUP
ENGINEERS, LLP
NC FIRM LICENSE #F-1240
3525 WHITEHALL PARK DRIVE
SUITE 150
CHARLOTTE, NC 28273
T 704. 489.1500
www.ces-group.net
'$7(223
6&$/( 2
6LOYHU&UHHN$LUSRUW5G
0RUJDQWRQ1&
TABLES
Table B-1: Site History – UST/AST System and Other Release Information
Revision Date: 10/25/2023 Incident Number and Name: 12170; Siler Creek Airport UST ID#: AS-1152
1 Gasoline Gasoline 4,000 Unknown Unknown Unknown 1983
Removed
5/8/1994 Yes
2 Gasoline Gasoline 4,000 Unknown Unknown Unknown 1983
Removed
5/8/1994 Yes
3 Gasoline Gasoline 4,000 Unknown Unknown Unknown 1983
Removed
5/8/1994 Yes
UST ID
Number
Tank
Dimensions
(diameter x
length)
Construction
Details
Description of
Associated
Piping and
Pumps
Capacity (in
gallons)
Previous
Contents
Current/Last
Contents
Was release
associated with
the UST
System?
Status of USTDate Tank
Installed
Page 1 of 2
Table B-1: Site History – UST/AST System and Other Release Information
Revision Date: 10/25/2023 Incident Number and Name: 12170; Siler Creek Airport UST ID#: AS-1152
Incident
Number
Material
Released
Date of
Release
12170 Petroleum Unknown
Date Tank
Installed
AST ID
Number
Current/Last
Contents *
Previous
Contents *
Capacity (in
gallons)
Construction
Details **
Tank
Dimensions
Description of Release
Presence of contaminated soil and groundwater during a Comprehensive Site Assessment performed
by Inenco June 1995.
Description of
Associated
Piping and
Pumps
Was release
associated with
the AST
System?
Status of AST ***
Waste oil AST or other above ground vessel or substantial petroleum storage container are known to have existed for the site.
Page 2 of 2
Table B-2: Site History - UST/AST Owner/Operator and
Other Responsible Party Information
Revision Date:10/25/2023 Incident Number and Name: 12170; Silver Creek Airport UST ID#: AS-1152
State Zip
North Carolina 28680
State Zip
North Carolina 28655
State Zip
Street Address
Silver Creek Aviation, Inc. Tanks 1-3 (1983 through March 1994)
UST ID
Number Facility ID Number
Name of Owner Dates of Operation
(mm/dd/yy to mm/dd/yy)
00-0-0000034074
1
2
3
City Telephone Number
Morganton N/A
P.O. Drawer 310
Name of Other Responsible Party Dates of Release(s)
(mm/dd/yy to mm/dd/yy)
Street Address
City Telephone Number
Morganton N/A
Incident
Number 12170
Street Address
44 Silver Creek Airport Road
City Telephone Number
Name of Operator Dates of Operation
(mm/dd/yy to mm/dd/yy)
Silver Creek Aviation, Inc. Tanks 1-3 (1983 through March 1994)
Table B-4: Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Revision Date: 10/31/2023 Incident Number and Name: Incident No. 12170; Silver Creek Airport UST ID#: AS-1152
6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B
Sample ID
Date
Collected
(m/dd/yy)
Incident
Phase
MW-1 12/4/1994 CSA 42 BDL 1,140 BDL BDL BDL NA
MW-1 4/13/1995 CSA 46.9 19.3 200 BDL BDL BDL NA
MW-1 10/10/2023 GWR BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 1.95 J
MW-2 4/13/1995 CSA BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL NA
MW-2 10/10/2023 GWR BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 2.01 J
1 600 600 500 20 70 400
5,000 80,000 260,000 50,000 20,000 70,000 4,000,000
µg/l = Micrograms per Liter
GCL = Gross Contamination Level
J = Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration
Concentrations in BOLD and Highlighted Yellow reported above 2L Standards (December 4, 1994 and April 13, 1995)
No concentrations were reported above 2L and GCL Standards (October 10, 2023)
Constituents not listed above were reported as BDLs
Laboratory analysis performed by Waypoint Analytical, Inc of Charlotte, NC (NC Certification No. 402)Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)EthylbenzeneTolueneXylenesMTBEIsopropyl EtherAnalytical Method (e.g., VOCs by
EPA 6200B)
Contaminant of Concern (mg/kg)
2L Standard (ug/L) (Effective
4/1/2022)
GCL (ug/L) (Table 2 - Revised
10/8/2020)Benzene
Table B-5: Public and Private Water Supply Well and Other Receptor Information
Revision Date: 10/25/2023 Incident Number and Name: 12170; Silver Creek Airport UST ID#: AS-1152
Water Supply Well and Other Receptor Information
Additional Information for Water Supply Wells (and Other Receptors, if applicable)
Well # / ID
(same as
above)
Public Water:
Connected /
Available / Not
Available
Well Currently Used
for:
Active /
Inactive /
Abandoned
Construction
Method and
Well Type
Total Depth (ft
BGS)
Screened
Interval (x to y
ft BGS)
ft BGS = Feet below ground surface
* Information retrieved from ATC Group Services, LLC of North Carolina, Limited Site Assessment Report, dated December 20, 2019
Receptor
Description
and Location
Details **
Latitude/
Longitude **
(decimal degrees)
Private / Public / Semi-Public Casing Depth (ft BGS)
A Well Receptor Survey was outside the scope of work for this Groundwater Monitoring Report.
A Well Receptor Survey was outside the scope of work for this Groundwater Monitoring Report.
Distance from
Source (ft)
Street Address for
Receptor
* Ex: WSW = Water Supply Well, SWB = Surface Water Body, Resvr = Reservoir, PWS = Public Water Supply, PW = Public Well, SW = Supply Well, WPA = Wellhead Protection Areas, RA = Recharge Areas (for
deep aquifers), Sub = Subsurface Structures, Con = Conduits, Other:
** The location and/or latitude/longitude (IN DECIMAL DEGREES) must be sufficiently accurate and precise to allow easy location of wells (or recovery if buried/paved/covered-over, lost, or otherwise damaged) and
for the location / replication of sampling points for any other receptor. Coordinates are estimated based on physical location of onsite structure(s)
*** Status: A = Active or IA = Inactive *and* Use: P = Potable or NP = Non-Potable Use. (Describe further in Additional Information for Water Supply Wells table below.)
Up or
Downgradient
(if known)
Well # Contact Name
Source
Status & Use
***
Type *Owner/User/
Both Contact Phone #
Page 1 of 1
Table B-9: Groundwater Elevations and Free Product Thickness
Revision Date: 10/25/2023 Incident No. 12170; Incident Name: Silver Creek Airport UST ID#: AS-1152
Well ID #Top of Casing
Elevation (MSL)
Screened Interval
(top of screen to
bottom of screen, ft.
bgs)
Date Depth to Water*
Uncorrected (ft. bgs)
Free Product
Thickness (ft.)
Depth to Water*
Corrected
for Free Product
Thickness (ft. bgs)
Groundwater Surface
Elevation (MSL)
MW-1 N/A Unknown 10/10/2023 8.89' 0.0 N/A N/A
MW-2 N/A 3 to 17 10/10/2023 10.03' 0.0 N/A N/A
bgs = below ground surface
ft. = feet
MSL = mean sea level
N/A = not applicable
APPENDIX A
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
View of monitoring well MW-1.
View of monitoring well MW-1.
View of monitoring well MW-2.
View of old fueling dispenser on concrete pad.
APPENDIX B
MONITORING FIELD DATA SHEETS,
SAMPLING PROTOCOLS, JOB HAZARD
ANALYSIS, AND HEALTH & SAFETY
PLAN
Appendix C: Groundwater Monitoring Field Data
Revision Date: 10/25/2023 Incident Number and Name: 12170; Silver Creek Airport UST ID No. AS-1152
Well ID
Sampling
Date
(m/dd/yy)
Well
Casing
Diameter
(in.)
Screened
Interval (x to y
ft. BGS)
Depth of
Well (ft. BGS)
Top of
Casing
Elevation
* (ft.)
Depth to
Water from
Top of
Casing (ft.)
Free Product
Thickness (ft.)
Groundwater
Elevation* (ft.)Sample Analysis
Number of
Sample
Containers
Proposed
Purged
Volume
(gal)
Actual
Purged
Volume
(gal)
Purge Comments MNA Parameters
MW-1 10/10/2023 2
3 to 17
(Presumed
based on total
depth of
monitoring well
and MW-2
construction)
17 N/A 8.89 ND N/A
6200B +
MTBE/IPE/EDB
and 625 BNA
5 3-gal 3-gal
Purged appr. 3-gallons prior to
sampling. Bailer on bottom.
Purged bailings observed to be
clear to murky brown. No odor
present, no sheen present on
bailings.
Not Collected
Silver Creek Airport, NCDEQ Incident No.: 12170, UST ID No.: AS-1152
*: Top-of-Casing elevations not obtained under current task order / work order
1
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND HEALTH AND SAFETY
PLAN
NCDEQ Project AS-1152_12170
Silver Creek Airport
Off Romarco Road
Morganton, Burke County, North Carolina
CES PROJECT NUMBER: 8219.1023E
Prepared by:
CES GROUP ENGINEERS, LLP
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28273
October 6, 2023
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE 2
1.2 RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY 3
1.3 SUBCONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY 3
2.0 ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY 4
2.1 SITE SAFETY OFFICER 4
2.2 PROJECT MANAGER(S) 5
3.0 BACKGROUND AND HAZARD EVALUATION 7
3.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7
3.2 HAZARD EVALUATION 7
3.3 SAFETY DATA SHEETS (SDS) 8
4.0 AIR MONITORING 9
4.1 MONITORING EQUIPMENT 9
4.2 TYPES AND FREQUENCY OF MONITORING 10
4.2.1 Breathing Zone Monitoring 10
4.2.2 Explosive Gas Source Monitoring 10
4.2.3 Work Area Monitoring 10
4.2.4 Dust Monitoring 10
4.3 ACTION LEVELS 11
5.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES 11
5.1 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION 11
5.2 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 12
5.3 LEVELS OF PROTECTION 13
5.3.1 Modified Level D 13
5.3.2 Level D Protection 13
5.3.3 Level C Protection 14
5.3.4 Level B Protection 14
6.0 SITE CONTROL 15
6.1 REGULATED AREAS 15
6.2 ACCESS/SITE SECURITY 16
6.3 POSTING/BARRICADES 16
ii
Page
7.0 POLICIES 16
7.1 GENERAL WORK PRACTICES 16
7.2 HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION 17
7.3 SANITATION 19
8.0 DECONTAMINATION 19
8.1 PERSONAL DECONTAMINATION 20
8.2 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION 21
9.0 TRAINING 22
9.1 BASIC TRAINING 22
9.2 SITE-SPECIFIC TRAINING 22
10.0 HEALTH MONITORING 23
10.1 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION 23
10.2 HEAT STRESS 23
10.3 COLD STRESS 24
10.4 SELF MONITORING 26
11.0 SITE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 26
11.1 WORK PRACTICES 26
11.2 COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES 27
12.0 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES 28
12.1 GENERAL 28
12.2 RESPONSIBILITIES 29
12.3 EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST 30
12.4 PERSONNEL INJURY IN THE EXCLUSION ZONE 32
12.5 PERSONNEL INJURY IN THE SUPPORT ZONE 32
12.6 FIRE OR EXPLOSION 32
12.7 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FAILURE 32
12.8 POLLUTANT DISCHARGES/SPILLS 32
APPENDIX A Safety Data Sheet (Benzene - Volatile Organic Compounds)
APPENDIX B Emergency Phone Numbers / Contact List
APPENDIX C Route to Hospital
1
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN (EMP)
NCDEQ Project AS-1152_12170
Silver Creek Airport
Off Romarco Road
Morganton, Burke County, North Carolina
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Environmental Management and Health and Safety Plan (EMP), additionally referred to
as the ‘plan”, has been developed for CES Group Engineers, LLP (CES), for application to
work completed at NCDEQ AS-1152_12170, Off Romarco Road, Morganton, Burke County,
North Carolina, under CES Project Number: 8219.1023E. For the purpose of this plan, the
term “project” references “NCDEQ AS-1152_12170”. Additionally, this plan should also be
utilized for any work completed at surrounding properties where contamination, or additional
assessment activities, may be located. For the purpose of this plan, the term “subsurface
investigation” will include, but is not limited to, geophysical investigations, drilling soil borings
with conversion to temporary or permanent monitoring wells, excavation and removal of
encountered underground storage tanks (USTs), and contaminated soils / groundwater, and
additional assessment and remediation activities, which may include hand-augering of soil
borings, installation of monitoring wells and/or remedial recovery wells, groundwater
monitoring and sampling, and injections, and the abandonment of monitoring wells. The term
“subsurface investigation” may also be referred to as “excavation” in this plan. The plan
addresses health and safety procedures and information relevant to environmental services
being provided by CES personnel, and/or subcontracted personnel. The health and safety
portion of the plan provides procedures to minimize: (1) the potential for accidents from
physical hazards, and (2) the potential for exposure to chemical contaminants during
activities which disturb the subsurface materials in the event that contamination of soil or
groundwater by special wastes is encountered. The Project Manager, assisted by the
assigned Site Safety officer, will ensure that all on-site subcontractor personnel, and site
visitors, comply with the specified health and safety requirements. At least one copy of this
EMP will be maintained at the local office of CES, as well as one copy will be maintained
onsite by CES, and/or subcontracted personnel.
As part of CES’ safety program, a site-specific Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) form will be used,
in conjunction with this plan, which will also include the name, address, and telephone
2
number of the nearest hospital in relation to the project address where work is being
completed. CES personnel have been instructed to utilize 911 as the first call should an
accident, or issue, be apparent that warrants an immediate emergency response action. This
plan is intended for general use during subsurface investigation activities completed by CES
personnel, or CES subconsultants/subcontractors, and as a general reference for workers to
review and understand the potential environmental and health and safety conditions that may
be present under normal subsurface investigation conditions. Additionally, this plan should
also be utilized for any work completed at surrounding properties where subsurface
investigation activities are, or may be required.
Prior to initiating subsurface investigation activities, as those referenced above, CES
personnel (Project Manager(s), Site Safety Officer, and/or Field Crews) will complete Job
Hazard Analysis (JHA) and selected CES safety forms which detail job specifics, including
the sequence of basic job steps, potential incidents or hazards, and recommended
procedures to eliminate potential incidents or hazards.
1.1 PURPOSE / OBJECTIVE
The protection of workers and environmental safety and health are major concerns during
this project and cannot be understated. The objective of the EMP is to document procedures
and precautions to be implemented during any geophysical investigations and installation of
soil borings with conversion to permanent monitoring wells, and site assessments, including
soil and groundwater monitoring and/or remediation activities, in order to provide for and
promote safe working conditions at the site during field activities, specifically at locations
where contamination of soil and groundwater has been documented and/or is expected to be
encountered. The safety organization and procedures have been established based on a
previous analysis of potential hazards at the site. Personal protection measures have been
selected in response to these potential hazards.
This EMP and HASP has also been developed based upon review of the requirements
described in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Standard Operating Safety
Guide and the U.S. Department of Labor OSHA standards 29 CFR Part 1910. Reasonable
precautions will be taken by the contractor’s representative and its subcontractors to provide
for and promote the safety and health of workers and the general public. Subcontractors will
be given copies and will be required to follow this EMP.
3
1.2 RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY
All site activities which have the potential to expose personnel to site contamination or a
related injury are subject to this EMP. Personnel will be responsible for adherence to the
safety procedures during the performance of the work. In no case may work be performed
in a manner that conflicts with the intent of, or the inherent safety and environmental cautions
expressed in, these procedures. Following due warning(s), personnel who violate safety
procedures will be dismissed from the site, and may be terminated. In the event that
contamination is encountered during regular construction operations, personnel will be
exclusively employed in the affected area of the project site, who have been properly trained
in health and safety regulations associated with handling hazardous materials or special
wastes as specified in the training section (Section 9.0) of this EMP.
The requirements provided herein may be modified as the work progresses to accommodate
changing conditions, but a reduction or increase in the health and safety requirements will
not be made without prior approval by the assigned Site Safety Officer (SSO). The prevention
of adverse health effects and injuries to site workers is totally dependent on the contribution
of all project participants. Open communication among workers, supervisors, and
management concerning safety at the site is an essential element of this EMP.
1.3 SUBCONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY
The Subcontractor is solely responsible for the health, safety, and protection of their own on-
site personnel during the performance of the survey services work scope. The Subcontractor
will perform the work specified in the contract documents in accordance with the HEALTH
AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS specified herein, and federal, OSHA, state, and local health
and safety regulations. It will be the responsibility of the Subcontractor to be familiar with the
required health and safety regulations in the performance of this work. The Subcontractor
will designate a Site Safety officer to implement and monitor activities related to this EMP.
Should any unforeseen or site-specific safety-related factor, hazard, or condition become
evident during the performance of the work, the Subcontractor will take immediate and
prudent action to establish and maintain safe working conditions and to safeguard site
personnel, the public, and the environment.
4
2.0 ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY
All site activities which have the potential to expose CES personnel to site contamination or
related injury are subject to this EMP. As previously discussed, all site personnel are
responsible for adherence to the safety procedures during performance of the work. Specific
oversight responsibilities are assigned to various personnel as discussed in the paragraphs
to follow.
2.1 SITE SAFETY OFFICER
The SSO will be assigned to monitor the daily activities to assure that all health and safety
procedures/policies are being followed by CES personnel. This includes communicating the
specific requirements to all personnel, including subcontractors, implementing the EMP,
conducting site inspections to monitor compliance with EMP as required, providing or
coordinating training as required, coordinating the medical monitoring program, coordinating
respirator fit tests as required, coordinating the acquisition, calibration and maintenance of
air monitoring equipment, respirators and other safety equipment, directing on-site health and
safety activities, and reporting safety related incidents or accidents to the Project Manager.
The SSO for CES is: Greg Hans, PMP
CES Group Engineers, LLP
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.325.5408 (direct)
617.828.9948 (mobile)
It should be noted that the SSO may and will delegate responsibilities to a representative of
CES, subconsultants and/or subcontractors working at the Site and offsite properties for any
and all tasks associated with additional subsurface investigation activities.
2.2 PROJECT MANAGER(S)
The project manager is ultimately responsible for ensuring that all project participants abide
by the requirements set forth in this plan. Any and all changes in the scope of health and
safety requirements or site characterization will be communicated from the Project Manager
and/or Environmental Scientist/Engineer to the SSO.
5
Environmental Project Manager: Greg Hans, PMP
CES Group Engineers, LLP
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.325.5408 (direct)
617.828.9948 (mobile)
Environmental Scientist: Matt Sumner
CES Group Engineers, LLP
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.832.9876 (mobile)
3.0 BACKGROUND AND HAZARD EVALUATION
3.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project involves monitoring of potentially contaminated soil and groundwater with
petroleum related constituents, and may also include geophysical investigations or utility
clearance, and the installation of soil borings with conversion to permanent monitoring wells
via mechanical drilling techniques, and potential future assessment, monitoring and
remediation of soil and groundwater contaminants potentially encountered by said or existing
borings. Future activities at the site may include, but are not limited to excavation and
removal of encountered underground storage tanks (USTs), and contaminated soils /
groundwater, and additional assessment and remediation activities, which may include hand-
augering of soil borings, installation of permanent monitoring wells and/or remedial recovery
wells, groundwater monitoring, and injections, and abandonment of monitoring wells. During
the completion of the aforementioned activities, heavy equipment and machinery, such as
drilling rigs, excavators, back-hoes, dump trucks, etc may be utilized and present onsite.
3.2 HAZARD EVALUATION
Constant attention will be given to physical hazards encountered during work day activities,
particularly those activities associated near heavy equipment such as drilling, subsurface
excavations, and/or earthmoving equipment. An evaluation of the potential hazards
associated with site activities has been completed by reviewing the general construction
6
scope of work for each of the projects, to be performed by others. The following potential
exposure pathways have been identified:
· Dermal contact, inhalation and ingestion of contaminated soils and
groundwater
· Inhalation and ingestion of contaminated vapors and particles
· Ingestion of waste solids (accidental/poor hygiene)
· Dermal contact with waste solids
Given that subsurface investigation activities may occur in close proximity to ongoing or future
construction (ie, excavations) related activities that may disturb surficial and subsurface soils,
pipes, etc and the physical properties of the contaminants that may be present at these
locations, there is a potential respiratory hazard from contaminants such as petroleum related
compounds, and therefore a contact hazard from petroleum related compounds. A
respiratory hazard from dust and contaminated dust particles may also exist during nearby
drilling, excavation and removal activities.
It is recognized that site hazard evaluation is a dynamic and on-going process that changes
on a daily basis during progression of the work. However, significant deviation from the
prescribed site characterization will necessitate re-evaluation and possible EMP revision.
Communication from the SSO will initiate the re-evaluation process by the Project Manager.
3.3 SAFETY DATA SHEETS (SDS)
Consistent with 29 CFS 1910.1200, (Hazard Communication Standard) applicable Safety
Data Sheets (or equivalent) will be kept on-site, in each vehicle, and with the Project
Manager. All subcontractors must ensure that their employees are informed of their rights
and responsibilities under the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard. Subcontractors will
provide SDS sheets for items which they bring on the site, as applicable. Due to the presence
of petroleum related constituents, a SDS for Benzene (prepared by Marathon Petroleum
Company, dated 5/14/2015), as VOC concentrations may be encountered onsite, has been
included as Appendix A. It should be noted that the attached SDS is representative of
potential chemicals and materials that may be encountered in the field during subsurface
investigation activities. Should these, or any other chemicals or hazardous materials, actually
be encountered by CES employees while in the field, the hazards and exposures of these
chemicals or hazardous materials will be re-evaluated.
7
4.0 AIR MONITORING
The purpose of air monitoring during subsurface investigation activities is to identify and
quantify airborne contaminants to determine the level of protection needed. Should air
monitoring for airborne contaminants be necessary, air monitoring with direct reading
instruments will be conducted during all intrusive activities. Four categories of air monitoring
will be conducted as follows:
· Breathing Zone Monitoring
· Explosive Gas Source Monitoring
· Work Area Monitoring
· Dust Monitoring
Equipment to be used in conducting air monitoring activities, along with a description of the
type and frequency of monitoring and associated action levels are discussed in the
paragraphs to follow. It should be noted that the contractors working in active construction
zones, including but not limited to excavations, trenches, bore holes, etc should be
responsible for proper air monitoring of these areas. However, should CES feel the need to
perform additional air monitoring, the following procedures (as outlined in sections 4.0
through 6.0, and to an extent, sections 7.0 through 11.0) may be implemented.
4.1 MONITORING EQUIPMENT
If CES employees are working in, or near, active construction zones where the potential
exists for chemical hazards and exposures to be present, the breathing zones will be
monitored using a MiniRAE portable VOC monitor. These instruments use a photoionization
detector that is designed to measure trace quantities of VOCs with a parts-per-million (ppm)
sensitivity range. It does not detect methane. The survey instrument will be calibrated using
an appropriate standard according to manufacturer’s instructions. The VOC monitor will be
calibrated prior to each use if the instrument is used infrequently, or daily when in constant
use.
If the MiniRAE portable VOC monitor detects elevated levels of VOC concentrations (> 50
ppmv), in ambient air at the site, a Gastech 02 /explosion/H2S meter will be used to measure
oxygen concentrations, explosion potential, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentration. The
instrument will be calibrated with methane and H2S according to the manufacturer’s
instructions.
8
Air monitoring equipment will be certified intrinsically safe and operated by personnel trained
in the use of the specific equipment provided.
4.2 TYPES AND FREQUENCY OF MONITORING
4.2.1 Breathing Zone Monitoring
The breathing zone of a representative employee suspected of greatest exposure for each
job category engaged in work with potentially hazardous substances will be monitored as
follows:
· For excavation operations, monitor the breathing zone of the
equipment operator and laborers with an OVM when the waste
material is initially exposed. The results of the monitoring, the
employee’s name, and the work activity will be recorded in the
daily log
4.2.2 Explosive Gas Source Monitoring
During all operations identified as having a fire/explosion hazard, a combustible gas meter
set to measure the lower explosive level (LEL) will be used to continuously monitor the top of
the trench or excavation.
4.2.3 Work Area Monitoring
Each work area associated with hazardous waste spills and/or contamination will be
monitored at least one time each day with an OVM to determine the concentration of
contaminants being released into the general area.
4.2.4 Dust Monitoring
Chemical exposure via inhalation will be mitigated through the evaluation of wind velocity,
and common sense. Personal protective equipment will be utilized as necessary (based on
specific action levels) to prevent chemical exposure in excess of the exposure limits.
When possible, personnel should be situated upwind of work activity when working at the
site. Excavated areas should be allowed to vent for one to two minutes prior to investigative
activities to allow any vapors, dusts, or gases to dissipate. Liquids and solids should never
be smelled to confirm the presence or absence of chemicals.
9
The SSO or CES representative will screen the site for dusty conditions to prevent inhalation
of chemicals in particulate form (e.g. residue on soil grains). If dusty conditions are observed,
all workers will wear appropriate respiratory protection designed for dusts. Extremely dusty
conditions may require dust suppression via water mist or spray prior to returning to work.
4.3 ACTION LEVELS
The action levels as prescribed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) will be used to initiate protective actions including, but not limited to, use of personal
protective devices, shut down of specific work activities, and site evacuation. A current
volume of the NIOSH Pocket Guide (electronic version) to Chemical hazards will, or may be
utilized as an on-site referenced by the SSO.
5.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES
5.1 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION
During excavation or construction activities in an area where special wastes are expected or
have been encountered, the use of respiratory protection equipment may be required.
Respiratory protection is of primary importance as inhalation is one of the major routes of
exposure to chemical toxicants. Respiratory protective devices include air purifying
respirators, air-line respirators, and self-contained breathing apparatus.
The following respiratory protection practices will be observed by all workers at the Site when
conditions warrant respiratory protection:
· The respiratory protection utilized on-site will be in accordance
with OSHA, 29 CFR 1910.134
· Only properly cleaned, maintained, NIOSH/MSHA-approved,
respirators will be used on-site (if required)
· Selection of respirators, as well as any decisions regarding
upgrading or downgrading of respiratory protection, will be
made by the SSO
10
· Air-purifying cartridges will be replaced on a regular basis (at
least once per day) as determined by the SSO
· No employee will be assigned to tasks requiring the use of
respirators if, based upon the most recent examination, a
physician determines that the employee will be unable to
function normally wearing a respirator or that the safety or
health of the employee or other employees will be
compromised by use of a respirator
· Persons required to wear full-face respirators must not have
beards or moustaches that interfere with proper respirator seal.
All personnel wearing full-face respirators or personnel working
in the exclusion zone will be required to be clean-shaven prior
to each day’s shift. This will be strictly enforced by the SSO
· All personnel required to use APRs must be properly fit tested
prior to engaging in field activities in accordance with OSHA
standards (29 CFR 1910.1025)
5.2 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
To protect workers against dermal contact with contaminants, the following apparel must be
worn during site-specific work activities depending on the level of protection specified for
those activities (Section 5.3 of this EMP):
· Disposable Tyvek coveralls
· PVC-coated or equivalent coveralls for splash protection
· Nitrile gloves or equivalent
· Inner gloves - latex or vinyl
· Outer disposable boots
· Hard hat
· Chemical-resistant boots (Neoprene, PVC, or equivalent)
· Hearing protection (as applicable)
· Steel-toed safety shoes
· Goggles or safety glasses will be worn at all times in the work area
11
· Sleeves taped to gloves and cuffs taped to boots
· Face shield attachments for use with hard hats
· Disposable, chemical-resistant outer boots
Upgrading or downgrading selected protective equipment will be the decision of the SSO
based on assessment of exposure potential during specific tasks.
5.3 LEVELS OF PROTECTION
The levels of protection to be utilized at the site, and the activities to which they apply, are
described in the following paragraphs. The SSO will select the appropriate level of PPE
based on air monitoring results.
5.3.1 Modified Level D
This is the minimum level of protective clothing to be worn at the site during subsurface
investigation activities. All workers, supervisors, and visitors will be required to don the
following clothing prior to entering the project site. Based on the anticipated activities to be
performed at the site, it is anticipated that Modified Level D will provide adequate protection
coverage.
· Work clothes
· Hard hat
· Safety shoes
· Visibility vest
· Work gloves (only as necessary)
5.3.2 Level D Protection
Level D protection includes chemical resistant gloves and will be used for site work whenever
contact with contaminated equipment or materials is possible. The following clothing will be
required for Level D:
· Disposable, chemical-resistant outer boots
· Coveralls (work uniform)
· Hard hat
· Eye protection (safety glasses, goggles, or face-shield)*
· Safety shoes
· Nitrile gloves*
* Optional, as determined by SSO
12
Dust masks shall be used to reduce employee exposure to fugitive dust, an optional Level D
device. The absence of dusty conditions at the site will be justification for the SSO to permit
personnel to remove their masks.
5.3.3 Level C Protection
Level C will be used for site work when the inhalation and dermal contact hazard is elevated.
When conditions for Level C protection are appropriate, the following equipment will be
required:
· Tyvek coveralls/chemical-resistant protective coverall
· Gloves (inner latex gloves and outer nitrile gloves)
· Hard hat
· Safety shoes
· Full-face or half-face air purifying respirator with organic vapor
cartridge (or other proper type cartridge for the intended use,
as determined by the SSO)
· Chemical-resistant outer boots
· Tape gloves and boots to coveralls to prevent leakage
· Hearing protection (as determined by SSO)
5.3.4 Level B Protection
Level B will be used for site work when inhalation and dermal contact hazard are elevated to
the point that a positive pressure, supplied air source is needed.
· Saranex coveralls/chemical-resistant clothing
· Gloves (inner latex gloves and outer nitrile gloves)
· Hard hat
· Self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), or Supplied Air-
Line Respirator (SAR)
· Chemical-resistant safety boots
· Gloves and boots taped to prevent leakage
13
6.0 SITE CONTROL
The purpose of site control is to minimize potential contamination of workers and to protect
the surrounding area from hazards found at the site. If the project site is not secured by
fencing or other suitable site control means and is not routinely patrolled by police or other
independent security personnel; certain procedures must be followed to ensure suitable site
control and limitation of access so that those persons who may be unaware of site conditions
are not exposed to hazards.
All excavations left open and unattended by site personnel will be appropriately barricaded
and visibly posted with “No Trespassing” or other appropriate signage. All heavy machinery
and equipment shall be locked or chained each evening upon completion of daily activities.
All potentially contaminated media, such as soil, will be covered with plastic prior to leaving
the site.
6.1 REGULATED AREAS
As appropriate to the task conducted, the site vicinity will be divided into three zones to allow
control of worker exposures. These zones are described as follows:
· Exclusion Zone. This zone includes the actual area of
contamination and localized work area where specific
investigative and/or construction equipment is operating. This
zone has the highest inhalation exposure potential, and/or
presents a high probability of skin contact with cutaneous
percutaneous - affecting chemicals. New exclusion zones
may exist during certain site-specific activities. This will be
defined by the SSO and access by individuals not necessary
to operation will be limited. (Level D is minimum).
· Contamination Reduction Zone. This zone includes the areas
immediately surrounding the Exclusion Zone. All personnel
and equipment leaving the Exclusion Zone shall be
decontaminated in this zone.
14
Support Zone. This zone covers all areas outside of the
Contamination Reduction Zone. Administrative activities are
conducted in the Support zone, as well as equipment supply
and first aid supply. It is essential that contamination be kept
out of this zone.
6.2 ACCESS/SITE SECURITY
Access to contaminated work areas (Exclusion and Contamination Reduction Zones) will be
regulated and limited to authorized persons. Such persons include the Contractor’s
employees, designated equipment operators, and designated union representatives, as
applicable. The SSO will enforce access limitations during work hours.
6.3 POSTING/BARRICADES
Warning signs will be posted and hung, as applicable, in readily visible locations in or near
contaminated work areas. Barricades or barricade tape will be utilized to prevent access to
various work areas as indicated above.
7.0 POLICIES
7.1 GENERAL WORK PRACTICES
General work practices to be employed on-site are as follows:
· At least one copy of this EMP will be available at the work site
· No food or beverages will be present or consumed in the
exclusion or contamination reduction zones. No tobacco
products will be present or used, and cosmetics will not be
applied in the exclusion or contamination reduction zones
· No matches or lighters are permitted in the exclusion or
contamination reduction zones
· During operations within an area of contamination, all
employees will be required to wash their hands and face before
eating, drinking, smoking, or applying cosmetics
15
· Field personnel must observe each other for signs of exposure.
Indications of adverse effects include, but are not limited to, the
following:
- Changes in complexion and skin
discoloration
- Changes in coordination
- Changes in demeanor
- Excessive salivation and
pupillary response
- Changes in speech pattern
Field personnel will be cautioned to inform the SSO of non-
visible effects of exposure such as the following:
- Headaches
- Dizziness
- Nausea
- Blurred vision
- Cramps
- Irritation of eyes, skin, or respiratory tract
·
7.2 HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION
Extra attention should be paid to the following information regarding work around heavy
equipment (cranes, excavators, front end/backhoe loaders, drilling rigs, etc.).
· Use common sense
· Follow OSHA requirements found in 29 CFR 1910 and 29 CFR
1926
· Wear hard hats, hearing protection, and safety glasses at all
times (when not prohibited by the use of air purifying
respirators). Wear other protective gear as specified in the
Health and Safety Plan
16
· A closed cab or cage will be required for equipment used at the
site
· Pay attention at all times
· Maintain visual contact at all times
· Establish hand signal communication when verbal
communication is difficult. Select one person per work group
to be the one to give hand signals to equipment operators
· Be aware of footing at all times
· Be sure that all heavy equipment has a backup alarm
· Be sure that only qualified people operate heavy equipment
· Use chains, hoists, straps, and other equipment to safely move
heavy materials
· Use proper personal lifting techniques. (Use your legs, not your
back)
· Never walk directly in back of, or to the side of, heavy
equipment without the operator’s knowledge
· Never use a piece of equipment unless you are familiar with its
operation. This applies to heavy as well as light equipment (for
example, chain saws)
· Make sure all precautions have been taken before moving pipe
sections and other materials to be utilized during this project as
they are extremely heavy. Let the equipment, not your body,
do the moving
17
· Be sure that no underground or overhead power lines, sewer
lines, gas lines, or telephone lines will present a hazard in the
work area
7.3 SANITATION
Onsite sanitation facilities (e.g., wash stations, etc.) may be provided for use by field
personnel assigned to the work if work activities involve the direct handling of contaminated
soils and groundwater.
8.0 DECONTAMINATION
The process of removing or neutralizing contaminants that have accumulated on personnel
and equipment is critical to personnel protection. Decontamination protects workers from
hazardous substances that may contaminate and eventually permeate the protective
clothing, respiratory equipment, tools, vehicles, and other equipment used on site.
Decontamination protects site personnel in the following ways: minimizing the transfer of
harmful materials into clean areas; preventing the mixing of incompatible chemicals; and
protecting the community by preventing uncontrolled transportation of contaminants from the
site.
General – Each time an employee enters the Contamination Reduction Zone from the
Exclusion Zone, he/she just make a thorough self-examination. Equipment must be removed
without exposure to the wearer. Hands and face must be scrubbed before eating or use of
tobacco or cosmetic products to avoid accidental ingestion of wastes. Footwear must be
changed prior to leaving the Contamination Reduction Zone to avoid “tracking” of
contaminants outside the area.
Clothing – The Contractor will provide all required protective clothing. Protective clothes will
be left in the change facility. No clothing (including boots) is to be worn or carried away from
the site. Soiled clothing is to be disposed of as appropriate.
Respirators – All required respirators will be provided and maintained by the Contractor and
will be cleaned daily. Cleaning and maintenance will be performed in accordance with the
appropriate OSHA standard (29 CFR 1910.134).
18
Packaging of Waste Items – All disposable clothing and other contaminated material will be
placed in containers for storage on-site. Personnel will make a conscious effort to minimize
the volume of contaminated materials. Legible and understandable precautionary labels will
be affixed prominently to containers of contaminated scrap, waste, debris, and clothing.
Containers will be disposed with other solids in an EPA-approved manner.
8.1 PERSONAL DECONTAMINATION
Minimum measures to be undertaken for decontamination are outlined below. These
measures are to be followed, as applicable, unless the SSO specifies that a higher level of
decontamination is warranted, and accordingly, sets forth upgraded decontamination
procedures.
MINIMUM MEASURES FOR DECONTAMINATION
STATION PROCEDURES
1. Equipment Drop 1. Deposit equipment used on site (tools, sampling
devices and containers, monitoring instruments, radios,
clipboards, etc.) on plastic drop cloths or in different
containers with plastic liners. During hot weather
operations, a cool down station may be set up within this
area.
2. Outer Garment, Boots and
Gloves Wash and Rinse
2. Scrub outer boots, outer gloves and fully encapsulating
suit with decon solution or detergent and water. Rinse off
using copious amounts of water.
3. Outer Boot and Glove
Removal
3. Remove outer boots and gloves. Deposit in container
with plastic liner.
4. Tank Change 4. If worker leaves Exclusion Zone to change air tanks,
this is the last step in the decontamination procedure.
Worker’s air tank is exchanged, new outer gloves and boot
covers donned, joints taped, and worker returns to duty.
5. Boot, Gloves and Outer
Garment Removal
5. Boots, fully-encapsulated suit, inner gloves removed
and deposited in separate containers lined with plastic.
6. SCBA Removal 6. SCBA backpack and facepiece is removed (avoid
touching face with fingers). SCBA deposited on plastic
sheets.
7. Field Wash 7. Hands and face are thoroughly washed. Shower as
soon as possible.
19
EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO PERFORM MINIMUM DECONTAMINATION MEASURES
STATION EQUIPMENT
1 A. Various Size Containers
B. Plastic Liners
C. Plastic Drop Cloths
2 A. Container (20-30 Gallons)
B. Decon. Solution or Detergent Water
C. Rinse Water
D. 2-3 Long-Handled, Soft Bristled Scrub
Brushes
3 A. Container (20-30 Gallons)
B. Plastic Liners
C. Bench or Stools
4 A. Air Tanks or Masks and Cartridges,
depending Upon Level.
B. Tape
C. Boot Covers
D. Gloves
5 A. Containers (20-30 Gallons)
B. Plastic Liners
C. Bench or Stools
6 A. Plastic Sheets
B. Basin or Bucket
C. Soap and Towels
D. Bench or Stools
8.2 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION
Any items taken into the Exclusion Zone will be assumed to be contaminated. In general,
vehicles, equipment, and materials brought into the Exclusion Zone will remain in the
Exclusion Zone until no longer necessary to the project.
20
All contaminated vehicles and equipment will be decontaminated before they are taken off-
site. The Contractor will provide and maintain the following facilities for equipment
decontamination:
- equipment decontamination pad
- contaminated water collection system
- high-pressure water or steam cleaners
- trisodium phosphate detergent
- wire brushes and scrapers
9.0 TRAINING
9.1 BASIC TRAINING
All employees who will perform work at the site must have completed environmental and
safety training as approved and/or provided by CES, the Owner, the Contractor, or if required,
by 3rd party General Contractor.
9.2 SITE-SPECIFIC TRAINING
Employees assigned to the site may, as needed, be given site-specific training and field
experience to include the following topics:
- Acute and chronic effects of the toxic chemicals found at the site
- Routes of potential exposure and field activities which could result in such
exposure
- Need for personal protection, types of protection, fit effectiveness and
limitations
- Medical surveillance program
- Work zones established at the site
- Prohibited activities in the Exclusion and Contamination Reduction Zones
- Engineering controls and safe work practices associated with each
employee’s work assignment, including dust control measures
- Personal and equipment decontamination procedures
- Emergency response procedures
- Basic operational safety, emphasizing hazards expected on-site
- Drum handling procedures
- Spill control
- Sampling procedures
- Site communication procedures
21
-
10.0 HEALTH MONITORING
10.1 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
The Contractor may require all of its field workers to pass a pre-employment medical
examination prior to working at the site. The examination shall include a complete medical
and occupational history, and an evaluation from the attending physician as to whether the
employee is qualified to work in areas where exposure to chemicals or physical stress is
possible, and is physically able to use protective equipment, including respirators.
10.2 HEAT STRESS
Subsurface investigation tasks, assignments, projects etc will, or may be conducted during
all four season, winter, spring, summer and fall. Accordingly, warm temperatures during
these time periods may put extra physical stress on the body. Long periods of exposure to
heat may cause illness, particularly if the employee is not accustomed to working in hot areas.
Also, heat builds up inside protective clothing, so there is a risk of heat stress even if outside
temperatures are moderate.
The signs, symptoms and treatment of heat stress are outlined below. All individuals
participating in work in the Exclusion Zone and Contamination Reduction Zones should be
monitored regularly for heat stress symptoms.
Heat Cramps
Symptoms: painful muscle spasms
Cause: profuse sweating and drinking large amounts of water
Treatment: provide liquids with electrolytes (sodium, potassium) like diluted
Gatorade
22
Heat Exhaustion
Symptoms: weakness, fatigue, dizziness; pale, cool, moist skin; heavy sweating;
Headache; nausea; and fainting
Cause: reduced blood volume resulting from dehydration from profuse
sweating and insufficient replacement of water and salts
Treatment: If worker is conscious, rest in cool place; replace water and electrolytes
lost in sweat; if unconscious, get medical help immediately. DO NOT
give liquids if person is unconscious
Heat Stroke
Symptoms: very dry, hot skin with red mottled or bluish appearance; confusion;
Convulsions; unconsciousness; rapidly rising temperature
Cause: body becomes overheated because the worker does not sweat.
Can be fatal.
Treatment: call for medical help immediately; move person to cool place;
remove PPE; use wet towels or water and fan to cool while waiting
for help.
10.4 COLD STRESS
Subsurface investigation tasks, assignments, projects etc will, or may be conducted during
all four season, winter, spring, summer and fall. Accordingly, cold temperatures during these
time periods may put extra physical stress on the body. Long periods of exposure to cold
may cause illness, particularly if the employee is not accustomed to working in cold areas.
Cold stress occurs by driving down the body’s skin temperature and eventually the body
temperature (core temperature).
The signs, symptoms and treatment of cold stress are outlined below. All individuals
participating in work in the Exclusion Zone and Contamination Reduction Zones should be
monitored regularly for cold stress symptoms.
23
Hypothermia:
Symptoms: shivering, reduced circulation, slow/weak pulse, slowed breathing, lack
of coordination, irritability, confusion, sleepy behavior
Cause: body heat is lost faster than it can be replaced and normal body
temperature drops below 95 degrees F
Treatment: move person to warm and dry area, remove wet clothes and replace
with dry clothes, layer with blankets, give warm sweetened liquids, if
unconscious, get medical help immediately. DO NOT give liquids if
person is unconscious
Frostbite
Symptoms: reddened skin, with development of gray/white patches, numbness,
firm or hard parts affected, blisters
Cause: freezing of skin and underlying tissues typically affecting extremities,
particularly the feet and hands
Treatment: move person to warm and dry area, remove wet clothes and replace
with dry clothes, layer with blankets, give warm sweetened liquids, if
unconscious, get medical help immediately. DO NOT give liquids if
person is unconscious. DO NOT rub affected area, DO NOT break
blisters, DO NOT try to directly warm the frostbite areas without
medical attention
Trench Foot
Symptoms: redness of skin, swelling, numbness, blisters
Cause: prolonged exposure to wet and cold temperatures, constantly wet and
cold feet, wet and cold feet lose heat 25x faster than dry feet
Treatment: call for medical help immediately; remove the shoes, boots, wet
socks, dry the feet
24
10.5 SELF MONITORING
While at the site, CES employees and sub-contractors will be required to monitor their own
health and that of their co-workers. Visual observations include:
- behavioral changes
- change in appetite
- coordination losses
- gum and lip discoloration
- increased salivation
- pupil dilation
- sensation losses
- skin rashes
- slurred speech
Any abnormalities or changes are to be reported to the physician and investigated
immediately. Such aspects could be symptoms of toxic exposure and must not be allowed to
persist without medical attention. In addition, all accidents and injuries, no matter how small,
are to be reported to the SSO and investigated.
11.0 SITE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
11.1 WORK PRACTICES
The need to exercise caution in the performance of specific work tasks is made more acute
due to weather conditions, restricted mobility, and reduced peripheral vision caused by the
protective gear itself, the need to maintain the integrity of the protective gear, and the
increased difficulty in communicating caused by respirators. Work at the site will be
conducted according to established procedures and guidelines for the safety and health of
all involved. Among the most important of these principles for working at the site are:
- In any unknown situation, always assume the worst conditions and plan
accordingly
- Establish and maintain communication
25
- Minimize contact with excavated or contaminated materials. Plan work
work areas, decontamination areas, and procedures to accomplish this.
Do not place equipment on drums or on the ground. Do not sit or stand
on drums or other materials
- Employ disposable items when possible to minimize risks during
decontamination and possible cross-contamination during
sampling/handling.
This will require a common-sense approach to potential risks and costs
- Smoking, eating, or drinking after entering the work zone and before
decontamination will not be allowed. Oral ingestion of contaminants from
your hands are a likely means of introduction of the toxic substances into the
body
- Avoid heat and other work stresses relating to wearing the protective gear.
Work breaks and proper tracking are planned to prevent stress-related
accidents or fatigue
- Maintain monitoring systems. Conditions can change quickly if sub-surface
areas of contamination are penetrated
- Be observant of not only your own immediate surroundings but also that of
others. It is a team effort to notice and warn of impending dangerous
situations. Extra precautions are necessary when working near heavy
equipment while utilizing personal protective gear, as vision, hearing, and
communication may be restricted by the protective gear
- Be aware that chemical contaminants may aggravate or worsen symptoms
of other illnesses or intoxication. Avoid use of alcohol and working when ill
11.2 COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES
Personnel in the Exclusion Zone shall remain within sight of other project personnel, and
should work in conjunction with another individual. Since it is not anticipated that the project
area will encompass a large area at any given time, radio communication will not be required.
26
The following standard hand signals will be used in the event that communication is required
amongst workers in and/or between the Exclusion Zone and Contamination Reduction Zone.
Hand gripping throat Out of air, cannot breathe
Grip partner’s wrist, or both Leave area immediately
Hands around partner’s waist
Rotating hands above the head Need assistance
Right hand thumb up OK, I’m all right, I understand
Right hand thumb down No, negative
12.0 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES
12.1 GENERAL
A comprehensive emergency response plan has been developed to handle all on-site
emergencies. A list of site conditions which might require implementation of the plan includes
but is not limited to:
- Fire or explosion on-site
- Serious employee injury
- Accumulation of combustible gases or vapors at concentrations greater than
background
- Oxygen concentration below 19.5%
- Unsafe working conditions, such as inclement weather or hazardous material
releases
- Major release of toxic materials for which appropriate PPE is not being worn
by workers
27
12.2 RESPONSIBILITIES
The emergency coordinator is the SSO (Greg Hans) or assigned CES representative working
onsite; the alternate or back-up is the Environmental Engineer (Chuck Heleine). The
emergency coordinator is responsible for:
- Assessing the situation and determining whether an emergency exists which
requires activating the plan
- Directing all efforts in the area, including evacuating personnel and minimizing
property loss
- Ensuring that outside emergency services such as fire departments, police,
ambulance, and hospitals are notified when necessary
- Directing the shut-down of site operations when necessary
- Notifying regulatory agencies as necessary
28
12.3 EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST
Emergency Contact Phone Number
Environmental PM: Greg Hans, PMP 617.828.9948 (M)
CES Group Engineers, LLP 704.325.5408 (D)
Other SSO (if assigned by
by Env PM) Carolina Soil Investigations (Drillers) 704.539.5279
(assigned CSI field crew chief)
Environmental Sci: Matt Sumner 704.832.9876 (M)
CES Group Engineers, LLP
Back-up PM Chuck Heleine, PE 704.308.7916 (M)
CES Group Engineers, LLP
Safety Administrator Taylor Ciucevich 704.325.5406 (D)
CES Group Engineers, LLP
Police: North Carolina Highway Patrol 911
Glen Alpine Police Department 828.584.2622
Hospital: UNC Health Blue Ridge 828.580.5000
2201 S Sterling Street
Morganton, NC 28655
Fire: Morganton Fire Station #70-1 828.432.2520
Doctor: UNC Health Blue Ridge 828.580.5000
Ambulance 911
NCDENR (Asheville Region) 828.296.4500
Directions to the nearest hospital: UNC Health Blue Ridge, 2201 S Sterling Street,
Morganton, NC 28655
Refer to Appendix C.
29
12.4 PERSONNEL INJURY IN THE EXCLUSION ZONE
When there is an injury in the Exclusion Zone, a continuous horn blast will be sounded as an
emergency signal (as applicable). Upon the sounding of the emergency signal, all site
personnel shall assemble in the personnel decontamination area. Rescue personnel will
enter the Exclusion Zone (if required) to remove the injured person. The SSO, or CES
representative, will evaluate the nature of the injury and call for an ambulance (if needed),
and the affected person will be decontaminated to the extent possible prior to movement to
the Support Zone. The appropriate first aid will be administered. No persons shall re-enter
the Exclusion Zone until the cause of the injury or symptom is determined.
12.5 PERSONAL INJURY IN THE SUPPORT ZONE
Upon notification of an injury in the Support Zone, the SSO, or CES representative, will
assess the nature of the injury. If the injury or absence of the injured person does not affect
the performance of site personnel, operations may continue while appropriate first aid and
follow-up is initiated. If the injury increases the risk to others, the designated emergency
signal (continuous horn blast) shall be sounded, and all site personnel shall move to the
decontamination line for further instructions. Activities on-site will stop until the added risk is
removed or minimized.
12.6 FIRE OR EXPLOSION
Upon notification of a fire or explosion on-site, a continuous horn blast will be sounded, and
all site personnel will assemble at the decontamination area. The fire department must be
alerted and all personnel moved as soon as possible to a safe distance.
12.7 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FAILURE
If any site worker experiences a failure or alteration of protective equipment which may alter
the protection factor, that person and his/her work partner must immediately leave the
Exclusion Zone. Re-entry shall not be permitted until the equipment has been appropriately
repaired or replaced.
12.8 POLLUTANT DISCHARGES/SPILLS
In the event of an unauthorized discharge of pollutants or contaminants into the soil, sewers, or
ambient air, the person first finding such an incident should immediately notify the Project
Manager and/or the SSO. The Project Manager and/or SSO will immediately notify Greg Hans
or Matt Sumner or Chuck Heleine and the Local Fire / Emergency Management agency (Burke
County Emergency Management at 828.764.9321).
APPENDIX A
SAFETY DATA SHEETS
(BENZENE)
SAFETY DATA SHEET
SDS ID NO.:0156MAR019
Revision Date 05/14/2015
1. IDENTIFICATION
Product Name:Marathon Petroleum Benzene
Synonym:Benzene; Cyclohexatriene
Product Code:0156MAR019
Chemical Family:Petroleum Hydrocarbon
Recommended Use:Solvent. Chemical intermediate.
Restrictions on Use:All others.
SDS information:1-419-421-3070
Emergency Telephone:1-877-627-5463
2. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
Classification
OSHA Regulatory Status
This chemical is considered hazardous by the 2012 OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200)
Skin corrosion/irritation Category 2
Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 2A
Germ cell mutagenicity Category 1B
Carcinogenicity Category 1A
Specific target organ toxicity (repeated exposure)Category 1
Aspiration toxicity Category 1
Acute aquatic toxicity Category 2
Hazards Not Otherwise Classified (HNOC)
Static accumulating flammable liquid
Label elements
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW
Manufacturer, Importer, or Responsible Party Name and Address:
MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY LP
539 South Main Street
Findlay, OH 45840
Flammable liquids Category 2
Danger
HIGHLY FLAMMABLE LIQUID AND VAPOR
May accumulate electrostatic charge and ignite or explode
SDS ID NO.: 0156MAR019 Product name: Marathon Petroleum Benzene Page 1 of 10
May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways
Causes skin irritation
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
0156MAR019 Marathon Petroleum Benzene Revision Date 05/14/2015
Precautionary Statements - Prevention
Obtain special instructions before use
Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read and understood
Keep away from heat/sparks/open flames/hot surfaces. - No smoking
Keep container tightly closed
Ground/bond container and receiving equipment
Use explosion-proof electrical/ventilating/lighting/equipment
Use only non-sparking tools.
Take precautionary measures against static discharge
Do not breathe dust/fume/gas/mist/vapors/spray
Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product
Wash hands and any possibly exposed skin thoroughly after handling
Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protection
Avoid release to the environment
Precautionary Statements - Response
IF exposed or concerned: Get medical attention
IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing
If eye irritation persists: Get medical attention
IF ON SKIN (or hair): Take off immediately all contaminated clothing. Rinse skin with water/shower
If skin irritation occurs: Get medical attention
Wash contaminated clothing before reuse
IF SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor
Do NOT induce vomiting
In case of fire: Use water spray, fog or regular foam for extinction
Precautionary Statements - Storage
Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep cool
Store locked up
Precautionary Statements - Disposal
Dispose of contents/container at an approved waste disposal plant
3. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Benzene is a six carbon aromatic petroleum hydrocarbon.
Composition Information:
Name CAS Number % Concentration
Benzene 71-43-2 99-100
All concentrations are percent by weight unless material is a gas. Gas concentrations are in percent by volume.
Causes serious eye irritation
May cause genetic defects
May cause cancer
Causes damage to organs (blood, blood-forming organs, immune system) through prolonged or repeated exposure
Toxic to aquatic life
Appearance Clear Liquid Physical State Liquid Odor Sweet , Distinct
SDS ID NO.: 0156MAR019 Product name: Marathon Petroleum Benzene Page 2 of 10
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
0156MAR019 Marathon Petroleum Benzene Revision Date 05/14/2015
4. FIRST AID MEASURES
First Aid Measures
General Advice:In case of accident or if you feel unwell, seek medical advice immediately (show directions
for use or safety data sheet if possible).
Inhalation:Remove to fresh air. If not breathing, institute rescue breathing. If breathing is difficult,
ensure airway is clear, give oxygen and continue to monitor. If heart has stopped,
immediately begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Keep affected person warm and at
rest. GET IMMEDIATE MEDICAL ATTENTION.
Skin Contact:Immediately wash exposed skin with plenty of soap and water while removing contaminated
clothing and shoes. May be absorbed through the skin in harmful amounts. Get medical
attention if irritation persists.
Place contaminated clothing in closed container until cleaned or discarded. If clothing is to
be laundered, inform the person performing the operation of contaminant's hazardous
properties. Destroy contaminated, non-chemical resistant footwear.
Eye Contact:Flush immediately with large amounts of water for at least 15 minutes. Eyelids should be
held away from the eyeball to ensure thorough rinsing. Gently remove contacts while
flushing. Get medical attention if irritation persists.
Ingestion:Do not induce vomiting because of danger of aspirating liquid into lungs, causing serious
damage and chemical pneumonitis. If spontaneous vomiting occurs, keep head below hips,
or if patient is lying down, turn body and head to side to prevent aspiration and monitor for
breathing difficulty. Never give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. Keep affected
person warm and at rest. GET IMMEDIATE MEDICAL ATTENTION.
Most important signs and symptoms, both short-term and delayed with overexposure
Adverse Effects:Overexposure to vapors may cause eye, skin and respiratory irritation. Headache,
drowsiness, dizziness, loss of coordination, disorientation and fatigue. Prolonged and
repeated contact may cause defatting and drying of the skin and may lead to irritation
and/or dermatitis. Prolonged or repeated exposure may cause adverse effects on blood,
blood-forming organs, and immune system.
Indication of any immediate medical attention and special treatment needed
Notes To Physician:INHALATION: This material (or a component) sensitizes the myocardium to the effects of
sympathomimetic amines. Epinephrine and other sympathomimetic drugs may initiate
cardiac arrhythmias in individuals exposed to this material. Administration of
sympathomimetic drugs should be avoided.
INGESTION: This material represents a significant aspiration and chemical pneumonitis
hazard. Induction of emesis is not recommended.
5. FIRE-FIGHTING MEASURES
Suitable extinguishing media
For small fires, Class B fire extinguishing media such as CO2, dry chemical, foam (AFFF/ATC) or water spray can be used. For
large fires, water spray, fog or foam (AFFF/ATC) can be used. Firefighting should be attempted only by those who are adequately
trained and equipped with proper protective equipment.
Unsuitable extinguishing media
Do not use straight water streams to avoid spreading fire.
SDS ID NO.: 0156MAR019 Product name: Marathon Petroleum Benzene Page 3 of 10
Specific hazards arising from the chemical
This product has been determined to be a highly flammable liquid per the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard and should be
handled accordingly. Vapors may travel along the ground or be moved by ventilation and ignited by many sources such as pilot
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
0156MAR019 Marathon Petroleum Benzene Revision Date 05/14/2015
lights, sparks, electric motors, static discharge, or other ignition sources at locations distant from material handling. Flashback can
occur along vapor trail. For additional fire related information, see NFPA 30 or the Emergency Response Guidebook 130.
Hazardous combustion products
Smoke, carbon monoxide, and other products of incomplete combustion.
Explosion data
Sensitivity to Mechanical Impact No.
Sensitivity to Static Discharge Yes.
Special protective equipment and precautions for firefighters
Firefighters should wear full protective clothing and positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) with a full
face-piece, as appropriate. Avoid using straight water streams. Water may be ineffective in extinguishing low flash point fires, but
can be used to cool exposed surfaces. Avoid excessive water spray application. Water spray and foam (AFFF/ATC) must be
applied carefully to avoid frothing and from as far a distance as possible. Keep run-off water out of sewers and water sources.
Additional firefighting tactics
FIRES INVOLVING TANKS OR CAR/TRAILER LOADS: Fight fire from maximum distance or use unmanned hose holders or
monitor nozzles. Cool containers with flooding quantities of water until well after the fire is out. Do not direct water at source of leak
or safety devices; icing may occur. Withdraw immediately in case of rising sound from venting safety devices or discoloration of
tank. ALWAYS stay away from tanks engulfed in fire. For massive fire, use unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles: if this is
impossible, withdraw from area and let fire burn.
EVACUATION: Consider initial downwind evacuation for at least 1000 feet. If tank, rail car or tank truck is involved in a fire,
ISOLATE for 5280 feet (1 mile) in all directions; also, consider initial evacuation of 5280 feet (1 mile) in all directions.
6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Personal precautions:Keep public away. Isolate and evacuate area. Shut off source if safe to do so. Eliminate all
ignition sources.
Protective equipment:Use personal protection measures as recommended in Section 8.
Emergency procedures:Advise authorities and National Response Center (800-424-8802) if the product has
entered a water course or sewer. Notify local health and pollution control agencies, if
appropriate.
Environmental precautions:Avoid release to the environment. Avoid subsoil penetration.
Methods and materials for
containment:
Contain liquid with sand or soil.
Methods and materials for cleaning
up:
Use suitable absorbent materials such as vermiculite, sand, or clay to clean up residual
liquids. Recover and return free product to proper containers. When recovering free liquids
ensure all equipment is grounded and bonded. Use only non-sparking tools.
7. HANDLING AND STORAGE
Safe Handling Precautions:NEVER SIPHON THIS PRODUCT BY MOUTH. Static accumulating flammable liquid. Use
appropriate grounding and bonding practices. Bonding and grounding may be insufficient to
eliminate the hazard from static electricity. Do not expose to heat, open flames, strong
oxidizers or other sources of ignition. Use only non-sparking tools. Do not cut, drill, grind or
weld on empty containers since explosive residues may remain. Avoid contact with skin,
eyes and clothing. Avoid breathing vapors or mists. Use only with adequate ventilation.
Use personal protection measures as recommended in Section 8. Exercise good personal
hygiene including removal of soiled clothing and prompt washing with soap and water.
Comply with all applicable EPA, OSHA, NFPA and consistent state and local requirements.
NFPA Health 2 Flammability 3 Instability 0 Special Hazard -
SDS ID NO.: 0156MAR019 Product name: Marathon Petroleum Benzene Page 4 of 10
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
0156MAR019 Marathon Petroleum Benzene Revision Date 05/14/2015
Hydrocarbons are basically non-conductors of electricity and can become electrostatically
charged during mixing, filtering, pumping at high flow rates or loading and transfer
operations. If this charge reaches a sufficiently high level, sparks can form that may ignite
the vapors of flammable liquids. Sudden release of hot organic chemical vapors or mists
from process equipment operating under elevated temperature and pressure, or sudden
ingress of air into vacuum equipment may result in ignition of vapors or mists without the
presence of obvious ignition sources. Nozzle spouts must be kept in contact with the
containers or tank during the entire filling operation.
Storage Conditions:Store in properly closed containers that are appropriately labeled and in a cool,
well-ventilated area.
Incompatible Materials Strong oxidizing agents.
8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION
Name ACGIH TLV OSHA PELS:OSHA - Vacated PELs NIOSH IDLH
Benzene
71-43-2
0.5 ppm TWA
2.5 ppm STEL
Skin - potential significant
contribution to overallexposure by the cutaneous
route
TWA: 10 ppm (applies to
industry segments exempt
from the benzene
standard)TWA: 1 ppm
STEL: 5 ppm
(see 29 CFR 1910.1028)
25 ppm Ceiling
1 ppm TWA
5 ppm STEL
500 ppm
Notes:The manufacturer has voluntarily elected to provide exposure limits contained in OSHA's
1989 air contaminants standard in its SDSs, even though certain of those exposure limits
were vacated in 1992.
Engineering measures:Local or general exhaust required in an enclosed area or when there is inadequate
ventilation. Use mechanical ventilation equipment that is explosion-proof.
Personal protective equipment
Eye protection:Use goggles or face-shield if the potential for splashing exists.
Skin and body protection:For non-exposure jobs or where exposure is expected to be less than 15 minutes, neoprene
gloves can be used to prevent skin contact. For all exposure jobs expected to be greater
than 15 minutes, Viton® gloves should be used to prevent skin contact. Glove suitability is
based on workplace conditions and usage. Contact the glove manufacturer for specific
advice on glove selection and breakthrough times. Depending upon the conditions of use
and specific work situations, additional protective equipment and/or clothing may be
required to control exposures.
Respiratory protection:Approved organic vapor chemical cartridge or supplied air respirators should be worn for
exposures to any components exceeding the established exposure limits. Observe
respirator assigned protection factors (APFs) criteria cited in federal OSHA 29 CFR
1910.134. Self-contained breathing apparatus should be used for fire fighting.
Hygiene measures:Handle in accordance with good industrial hygiene and safety practice. Avoid contact with
skin, eyes and clothing.
9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Information on basic physical and chemical properties
Physical State Liquid
Appearance Clear Liquid
Color Colorless
Odor Sweet , Distinct
Odor Threshold 12 ppmv
Property Values (Method)
SDS ID NO.: 0156MAR019 Product name: Marathon Petroleum Benzene Page 5 of 10
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
0156MAR019 Marathon Petroleum Benzene Revision Date 05/14/2015
Melting Point / Freezing Point 5.5 °C / 42 °F
Initial Boiling Point / Boiling Range 80 °C / 176 °F
Flash Point -11 °C / 12 °F
Evaporation Rate 5.1 (Butyl acetate = 1)
Flammability (solid, gas)Not applicable.
Flammability Limit in Air (%):
Upper Flammability Limit:7.1
Lower Flammability Limit:1.4
Explosion limits:No data available.
Vapor Pressure 3.21 psia @ 100°F
Vapor Density 2.7 (Air = 1)
Specific Gravity / Relative Density 0.883
Water Solubility No data available.
Solubility in other solvents No data available.
Partition Coefficient No data available.
Decomposition temperature No data available.
pH:Not applicable.
Autoignition Temperature 562 °C / 1044 °F
Kinematic Viscosity 0.593 cSt @ 100°F
Dynamic Viscosity No data available.
Explosive Properties No data available.
VOC Content (%)No data available.
Density No data available.
Bulk Density Not applicable.
10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
Chemical stability The material is stable at 70°F (21°C ), 760 mmHg pressure.
Possibility of hazardous reactions None under normal processing.
Hazardous polymerization Will not occur.
Conditions to avoid Sources of heat or ignition.
Incompatible Materials Strong oxidizing agents.
Hazardous decomposition products None known under normal conditions of use.
11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Potential short-term adverse effects from overexposures
Inhalation Overexposure may cause respiratory tract irritation and central nervous system
depression. Breathing high concentrations of this material, for example, in a confined space
or by intentional abuse, can cause irregular heartbeats which can cause death.
Eye contact Irritating to eyes.
Skin contact Irritating to skin. May be absorbed through the skin in harmful amounts. Effects may
become more serious with repeated or prolonged contact.
Ingestion May be fatal if swallowed or vomited and enters airways. May cause irritation of the mouth,
throat and gastrointestinal tract. May cause central nervous system depression or effects.
Acute toxicological data
Name Oral LD50 Dermal LD50 Inhalation LC50
Benzene > 2000 mg/kg (Rat)> 5000 mg/kg (Rabbit)> 20 mg/l (Rat) 4 h
Reactivity The product is non-reactive under normal conditions.
SDS ID NO.: 0156MAR019 Product name: Marathon Petroleum Benzene Page 6 of 10
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
0156MAR019 Marathon Petroleum Benzene Revision Date 05/14/2015
71-43-2
Delayed and immediate effects as well as chronic effects from short and long-term exposure
BENZENE: Studies of workers exposed to benzene show clear evidence that overexposure
can cause cancer and other diseases of the blood forming organs including Acute
Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), and Aplastic Anemia (AA), an often fatal disease. Some
studies suggest overexposure to benzene may also be associated with Myelodysplastic
Syndrome (MDS). Findings from a case control study of workers exposed to benzene was
reported during the 2009 Benzene Symposium in Munich included an increase in Acute
Myeloid Leukemias and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoid Neoplasms (NHLN) of the subtype
follicular lymphoma (FL) in some occupational categories. Some studies of workers
exposed to benzene have shown an association with increased rates of chromosome
aberrations in circulating lymphocytes. One study of women workers exposed to benzene
suggested a weak association with irregular menstruation. However, other studies of
workers exposed to benzene have not demonstrated clear evidence of an effect on fertility
or reproductive outcome in humans. Benzene can cross the placenta and affect the
developing fetus. Cases of AA have been reported in the offspring of persons severely
overexposed to benzene. Studies in laboratory animals indicate that prolonged, repeated
exposure to high levels of benzene vapor can cause bone marrow suppression and cancer
in multiple organ systems. Studies in laboratory animals show evidence of adverse effects
on male reproductive organs following high levels of exposure but no significant effects on
reproduction have been observed. Embryotoxicity has been reported in studies of
laboratory animals but effects were limited to reduced fetal weight and minor skeletal
variations. Benzene has been classified as a proven human carcinogen by OSHA and a
Group 1 (Carcinogenic to Humans) material by IARC. The current proposed IARC
classification for benzene is summarized as follows: Sufficient evidence for Acute Myeloid
Leukemia; limited evidence for Acute Lymphatic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphatic Leukemia,
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, and Multiple Myeloma.
Adverse effects related to the physical, chemical and toxicological characteristics
Signs and Symptoms Overexposure to vapors may cause eye, skin and respiratory irritation. Inhalation of high
vapor concentrations may cause symptoms like headache, dizziness, tiredness, nausea
and vomiting Repeated or prolonged skin contact may cause drying, reddening, itching and
cracking.
Sensitization Not expected to be a skin or respiratory sensitizer.
Mutagenic effects May cause genetic defects.
Carcinogenicity Cancer designations are listed in the table below
Name ACGIH
(Class)
IARC
(Class)
NTP OSHA
Benzene
71-43-2
Confirmed human
carcinogen (A1)
Carcinogenic to humans (1)Known to be human
carcinogen
Known carcinogen
Reproductive toxicity None known.
Specific Target Organ Toxicity
(STOT) - single exposure
Not classified.
Specific Target Organ Toxicity
(STOT) - repeated exposure
Blood. Blood-forming organs. Immune system.
Aspiration hazard May be fatal if swallowed or vomited and enters airways.
12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Ecotoxicity This product should be considered toxic to aquatic organisms.
Name Algae/aquatic plants Fish Toxicity to Crustacea
SDS ID NO.: 0156MAR019 Product name: Marathon Petroleum Benzene Page 7 of 10
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
0156MAR019 Marathon Petroleum Benzene Revision Date 05/14/2015
Microorganisms
Benzene
71-43-2
72-hr EC50 = 29 mg/l
Algae
96-hr LC50 = 5.3 mg/l
Rainbow trout
(flow-through)
-48-hr EC50 = 8.76-15.6 mg/l
Daphnia magna (Static)
Persistence and degradability Readily biodegradable in the environment.
Bioaccumulation Not expected to bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms.
Mobility in soil May partition into air, soil and water.
Other adverse effects No information available.
13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Description of Waste Residues
This material may be a flammable liquid waste.
Safe Handling of Wastes
Handle in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations. Use personal protection measures as required. Use
appropriate grounding and bonding practices. Use only non-sparking tools. Do not expose to heat, open flames, strong oxidizers or
other sources of ignition. No smoking.
Disposal of Wastes / Methods of Disposal
The user is responsible for determining if any discarded material is a hazardous waste (40 CFR 262.11). Dispose of in accordance
with federal, state and local regulations.
Methods of Contaminated Packaging DisposalEmpty containers should be completely drained and then discarded or recycled, if possible. Do not cut, drill, grind or weld on empty
containers since explosive residues may be present. Dispose of in accordance with federal, state and local regulations.
14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION
DOT (49 CFR 172.101):
UN Proper Shipping Name:Benzene
UN/Identification No:UN 1114
Class:3
Packing Group:II
TDG (Canada):
UN Proper Shipping Name:Benzene
UN/Identification No:UN 1114
Transport Hazard Class(es):3
Packing Group:II
15. REGULATORY INFORMATION
US Federal Regulatory Information:
US TSCA Chemical Inventory Section 8(b):This product and/or its components are listed on the TSCA
Chemical Inventory.
EPA Superfund Amendment & Reauthorization Act (SARA):
SARA Section 302:This product does not contain any component(s) included on EPA's Extremely Hazardous
Substance (EHS) List.
Name CERCLA/SARA - Section 302 Extremely Hazardous
Substances and TPQs
Benzene NA
SDS ID NO.: 0156MAR019 Product name: Marathon Petroleum Benzene Page 8 of 10
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
0156MAR019 Marathon Petroleum Benzene Revision Date 05/14/2015
SARA Section 304:This product may contain component(s) identified either as an EHS or a CERCLA
Hazardous substance which in case of a spill or release may be subject to SARA reporting
requirements:
Name Hazardous Substances RQs
Benzene 10
SARA Section 311/312:The following EPA hazard categories apply to this product:
Acute Health Hazard
Chronic Health Hazard
Fire Hazard
SARA Section 313:This product may contain component(s), which if in exceedance of the de minimus
threshold, may be subject to the reporting requirements of SARA Title III Section 313 Toxic
Release Reporting (Form R).
Name CERCLA/SARA 313 Emission reporting:
Benzene 0.1 % de minimis concentration
State and Community Right-To-Know Regulations:
The following component(s) of this material are identified on the regulatory lists below:
Benzene
Louisiana Right-To-Know:Not Listed
California Proposition 65:Carcinogen, initial date 2/27/87
Developmental toxicity, initial date 12/26/97
Male reproductive toxicity, initial date 12/26/97
New Jersey Right-To-Know:SN 0197
Pennsylvania Right-To-Know:Environmental hazard; Special hazardous substance
Massachusetts Right-To Know:Carcinogen; Extraordinarily hazardous
Florida Substance List:Not Listed
Rhode Island Right-To-Know:Toxic (skin); Flammable (skin); Carcinogen (skin)
Michigan Critical Materials Register List:100 lb Annual usage threshold
Massachusetts Extraordinarily Hazardous Substances:Carcinogen; Extraordinarily hazardous
California - Regulated Carcinogens:Not Listed
Pennsylvania RTK - Special Hazardous
Substances:
Present
New Jersey - Special Hazardous Substances:Carcinogen; Flammable - third degree; Mutagen
New Jersey - Environmental Hazardous
Substances List:
SN 0197 TPQ: 500 lb
Illinois - Toxic Air Contaminants:Present
New York - Reporting of Releases Part 597 -
List of Hazardous Substances:
10 lb RQ (air); 1 lb RQ (land/water)
Canada DSL/NDSL Inventory:This product and/or its components are listed either on the Domestic Substances List (DSL)
or are exempt.
Canadian Regulatory Information:This product has been classified in accordance with the hazard criteria of the Controlled
Products Regulations and the SDS contains all of the information required by those
regulations.
Name Canada - WHMIS: Classifications of
Substances:
Canada - WHMIS: Ingredient
Disclosure:
Benzene B2,D2A,D2B 0.1%
Note:Not applicable.
SDS ID NO.: 0156MAR019 Product name: Marathon Petroleum Benzene Page 9 of 10
16. OTHER INFORMATION
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
0156MAR019 Marathon Petroleum Benzene Revision Date 05/14/2015
Prepared By Toxicology and Product Safety
Revision Notes
Revision Date 05/14/2015
Disclaimer
The information provided in this Safety Data Sheet is correct to the best of our knowledge, information and belief at the
date of its publication. The information is intended as guidance for safe handling, use, processing, storage,
transportation, accidental release, clean-up and disposal and is not considered a warranty or quality specification. The
information relates only to the specific material designated and may not be valid for such material used in combination
with any other materials or in any process, unless specified in the text.
SDS ID NO.: 0156MAR019 Product name: Marathon Petroleum Benzene Page 10 of 10
APPENDIX B
EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBERS
Emergency Contact Phone Number
Environmental PM: Greg Hans, PMP 617.828.9948 (M)
CES Group Engineers, LLP 704.325.5408 (D)
Other SSO (if assigned by
by Env PM) Carolina Soil Investigations (Drillers) 704.539.5279
(assigned CSI field crew chief)
Environmental Sci: Matt Sumner 704.832.9876 (M)
CES Group Engineers, LLP
Back-up PM Chuck Heleine, PE 704.308.7916 (M)
CES Group Engineers, LLP
Safety Administrator Taylor Ciucevich 704.325.5406 (D)
CES Group Engineers, LLP
Police: North Carolina Highway Patrol 911
Glen Alpine Police Department 828.584.2622
Hospital: UNC Health Blue Ridge 828.580.5000
2201 S Sterling Street
Morganton, NC 28655
Fire: Morganton Fire Station #70-1 828.432.2520
Doctor: UNC Health Blue Ridge 828.580.5000
Ambulance 911
NCDENR (Asheville Region) 828.296.4500
Directions to the nearest hospital: UNC Health Blue Ridge, 2201 S Sterling Street, Morganton,
NC 28655
Refer to Appendix C.
APPENDIX C
ROUTE TO HOSPITAL
Starting at approximate address of Romarco Road, Morganton, NC
End at UNC Health Blue Ridge, 2201 S Sterling Street, Morganton, NC 28655
Site/Location Contract Number N042023
Customer NCDEQ STF (Scott Ryals)Prepared By
Competent Person Greg Hans Date Prepared 10/8/2023
Phone Number 617-828-9948 PPE Level Level D
Step
Step
Step
Step
Closest Hospital/ER UNC Health Blue Ridge
Hospital Address 2201 S Sterling St, Morganton, NC 28655
Hospital Phone #828-580-5000
Local Police Number 828-438-5500 (Burke County Sheriff's Office)
10/8/2023
Signature Date
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150, Charlotte, NC 28273
Sequence of Basic Job Steps Potential Incidents or Hazards
Recommended Procedures to Eliminate
Potential Hazards/Incidents
5 Collecting GW Samples Exposure to Contaminants
Wear proper PPE (change gloves to avoid
cross contamination). Monitor ambient air for
petroleum vapors.
Matt Sumner
Printed Name
CALL 911 FOREMERGENCY
2 Parking Vehicular accidents / damage to vehicles
Park in areas off of roadway, at least 10 feet,
use orange cones and flashers to identify
parked location. Discuss parking areas with
current site owners/managers.
3 Site Recon / Surveys Slips, Trips, Falls / Vehicles
Wear proper PPE (including visibility vest),
maintain safe distance from travel lanes at all
times, do not turn back to oncoming traffic.
Avoid crossing busy streets/intersections.
Check surface areas prior to accessing for S,
T, F hazards.
Job Hazard Analysis & Health/Safety Issues
Sequence of Basic Job Steps Potential Incidents or Hazards
Recommended Procedures to Eliminate
Potential Hazards/Incidents
Driving / Site Access Vehicular accidents / traffic violations /
accidents with large equipment
Practice defensive driving techniques, use
turn signals, stay in lanes, obey speed limits /
while onsite, pay close attention to large
pieces of equipment in facility and make eye
contact with operators before proceeding /
always have strobe light flashers on.
1
Silver Creek Airport - 130 Silver
Creek Airport Road, Morganton,
North Carolina
Matt Sumner (704-832-9876)
Sequence of Basic Job Steps Potential Incidents or Hazards
Recommended Procedures to Eliminate
Potential Hazards/Incidents
Sequence of Basic Job Steps Potential Incidents or Hazards
APPENDIX C
GROUNDWATER LABORATORY
REPORTS AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY
RECORDS
Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.
10/17/2023
CES Group Greg Hans
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150 Charlotte, NC, 28273
Ref: Analytical Testing
Lab Report Number: 23-284-0002 Client Project Description: Silver Creek Airport
Dear Greg Hans:
Waypoint Analytical, LLC (Charlotte) received sample(s) on 10/11/2023 for the analyses presented in the
following report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in accordance with the applicable analytical method.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all parameters were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA (including 40 CFR 136
Method Update Rule May 2021) unless otherwise indicated. Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as-received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report. Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely,
Angela D Overcash Senior Project Manager
Page 1 of 40
Certification Summary
Laboratory ID: WP CNC: Waypoint Analytical Carolina, Inc. (C), Charlotte, NC
State Program Lab ID Expiration Date
07/31/202437735State ProgramNorth Carolina
12/31/2023402State ProgramNorth Carolina
07/31/202499012State ProgramSouth Carolina
12/31/202399012State ProgramSouth Carolina
Page 1 of 1 00016/23-284-0002
Page 2 of 40
Report Number:
Sample Summary Table
Client Project Description:
23-284-0002
Silver Creek Airport
Lab No Client Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received
10/10/2023 13:30Aqueous 97407 MW-1 10/11/2023 09:28
10/10/2023 13:50Aqueous 97408 MW-2 10/11/2023 09:28
10/10/2023 14:00Aqueous 97409 Field Blank 10/11/2023 09:28
Page 3 of 40
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
23-284-0002
Report Limit
Project:Silver Creek Airport
V 97407MW-1
J1.95 10/14/2023 06:366200BMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/L 0.710
V 97408MW-2
J2.01 10/14/2023 07:006200BMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/L 0.710
V 97409Field Blank
J2.18 10/14/2023 03:466200BMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/L 0.710
Page 4 of 40
Client: CES Group CASE NARRATIVE
Project: Silver Creek Airport Lab Report Number: 23-284-0002
Date: 10/17/2023
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS Method 625.1 Analyte: Benzidine QC Batch No: V38982/V38943
Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits.
Analyte: Hexachlorocyclopentadiene QC Batch No: V38982/V38943
Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits.
Page 5 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-1
97407 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:30
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 10.0Acetone 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Benzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500Bromobenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00Bromochloromethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.500Bromodichloromethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.00Bromoform 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.280 µg/L 0.280 1.00Bromomethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500n-Butylbenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.500
sec-Butyl benzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.920 µg/L 0.920 2.00tert-Butyl benzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Carbon Tetrachloride 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorodibromomethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.430 µg/L 0.430 1.00Chloroethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Chloroform 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Chloromethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5002-Chlorotoluene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5004-Chlorotoluene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.500 µg/L 0.500 0.500Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 2.001,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,2-Dibromoethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.230 µg/L 0.230 0.500Dibromomethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 6 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-1
97407 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:30
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.5001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.5001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<1.20 µg/L 1.20 5.00Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.240 µg/L 0.240 0.5001,1-Dichloroethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,2-Dichloroethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,1-Dichloroethene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2-Dichloropropane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.130 µg/L 0.130 0.5001,3-Dichloropropane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 2.002,2-Dichloropropane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,1-Dichloropropene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.500trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<42.0 µg/L 42.0 200
Ethanol 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Ethylbenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.350 µg/L 0.350 3.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 1.002-Hexanone 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Isopropylbenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.089 µg/L 0.089 0.5004-Isopropyl toluene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
1.95 J µg/L 0.710 5.00Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 7 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-1
97407 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:30
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<0.140 µg/L 0.140 1.00Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.078 µg/L 0.078 1.004-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.330 µg/L 0.330 2.00Methylene Chloride 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.470 µg/L 0.470 1.00Naphthalene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500n-Propylbenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Styrene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Tetrachloroethene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Toluene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 0.5001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.310 µg/L 0.310 0.5001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.096 µg/L 0.096 0.5001,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Trichloroethene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.270 µg/L 0.270 0.5001,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.5001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<1.00 µg/L 1.00 5.00Vinyl Acetate 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Vinyl Chloride 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500o-Xylene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 8 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-1
97407 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:30
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00m,p-Xylene 1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113MSA
<0.21 µg/L 0.210 0.500Xylene (Total)1 10/14/23 06:36 V39113
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 06:361 MSA V39113
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 96.4 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 06:361 MSA V39113
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 98.4 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 06:361 MSA V39113
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 100 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 06:361 MSA V39113
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<0.302 µg/L 0.302 2.00Acenaphthene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.297 µg/L 0.297 2.00Acenaphthylene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.836 µg/L 0.836 2.00Anthracene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.32 µg/L 1.32 10.0
Benzidine 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.637 µg/L 0.637 2.00Benzo(a)anthracene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.02 µg/L 1.02 2.00Benzo(a)pyrene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<2.49 µg/L 2.49 5.00Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.01 µg/L 1.01 5.00Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.99 µg/L 1.99 5.00Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 10.0Benzoic Acid 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.684 µg/L 0.684 5.00
Benzyl alcohol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.468 µg/L 0.468 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 9 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-1
97407 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:30
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<1.04 µg/L 1.04 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.08 µg/L 1.08 5.00Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<3.46 µg/L 3.46 10.0Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.004-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.83 µg/L 1.83 5.00Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.18 µg/L 1.18 5.004-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<7.38 µg/L 7.38 20.02-Chloronaphthalene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.938 µg/L 0.938 10.02-Chlorophenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.71 µg/L 1.71 5.00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.405 µg/L 0.405 2.00Chrysene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.856 µg/L 0.856 5.00Dibenzofuran 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.89 µg/L 1.89 5.00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.46 µg/L 1.46 10.02,4-Dichlorophenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.745 µg/L 0.745 5.00Diethyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.939 µg/L 0.939 5.00Dimethyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.57 µg/L 1.57 20.02,4-Dimethylphenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<2.06 µg/L 2.06 5.00Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<2.07 µg/L 2.07 10.04,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 10 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-1
97407 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:30
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<1.92 µg/L 1.92 10.02,4-Dinitrophenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.002,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.809 µg/L 0.809 5.002,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.65 µg/L 1.65 5.00Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.250 µg/L 0.250 2.00Fluoranthene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.807 µg/L 0.807 2.00Fluorene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.979 µg/L 0.979 5.00Hexachlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<2.73 µg/L 2.73 5.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.76 µg/L 1.76 5.00Hexachloroethane 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.477 µg/L 0.477 2.00Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.444 µg/L 0.444 5.00Isophorone 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.14 µg/L 1.14 2.001-Methylnaphthalene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.666 µg/L 0.666 2.002-Methylnaphthalene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.728 µg/L 0.728 2.00Naphthalene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.905 µg/L 0.905 5.00
Nitrobenzene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.493 µg/L 0.493 5.002-Nitrophenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.23 µg/L 1.23 10.04-Nitrophenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 5.00N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.641 µg/L 0.641 5.00N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.43 µg/L 1.43 5.00Pentachlorophenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.428 µg/L 0.428 2.00Phenanthrene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 11 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-1
97407 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:30
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<0.651 µg/L 0.651 5.00Phenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Pyrene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<2.21 µg/L 2.21 5.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
<1.32 µg/L 1.32 5.002,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 10/12/23 20:49 V38982AMP
625.1Surrogate: Phenol-d5 22.7 Limits: 10-63%10/12/23 20:491 AMP
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 71.0 Limits: 49-118%10/12/23 20:491 AMP V38982
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 33.4 Limits: 22-84%10/12/23 20:491 AMP V38982
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 61.6 Limits: 43-123%10/12/23 20:491 AMP V38982
Surrogate: 4-Terphenyl-d14 84.6 Limits: 49-151%10/12/23 20:491 AMP V38982
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 93.0 Limits: 31-144%10/12/23 20:491 AMP V38982
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 12 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97408 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:50
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 10.0Acetone 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Benzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500Bromobenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00Bromochloromethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.500Bromodichloromethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.00Bromoform 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.280 µg/L 0.280 1.00Bromomethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500n-Butylbenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.500
sec-Butyl benzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.920 µg/L 0.920 2.00tert-Butyl benzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Carbon Tetrachloride 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorodibromomethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.430 µg/L 0.430 1.00Chloroethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Chloroform 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Chloromethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5002-Chlorotoluene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5004-Chlorotoluene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.500 µg/L 0.500 0.500Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 2.001,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,2-Dibromoethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.230 µg/L 0.230 0.500Dibromomethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 13 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97408 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:50
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.5001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.5001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<1.20 µg/L 1.20 5.00Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.240 µg/L 0.240 0.5001,1-Dichloroethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,2-Dichloroethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,1-Dichloroethene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2-Dichloropropane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.130 µg/L 0.130 0.5001,3-Dichloropropane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 2.002,2-Dichloropropane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,1-Dichloropropene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.500trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<42.0 µg/L 42.0 200
Ethanol 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Ethylbenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.350 µg/L 0.350 3.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 1.002-Hexanone 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Isopropylbenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.089 µg/L 0.089 0.5004-Isopropyl toluene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
2.01 J µg/L 0.710 5.00Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 14 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97408 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:50
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<0.140 µg/L 0.140 1.00Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.078 µg/L 0.078 1.004-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.330 µg/L 0.330 2.00Methylene Chloride 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.470 µg/L 0.470 1.00Naphthalene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500n-Propylbenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Styrene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Tetrachloroethene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Toluene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 0.5001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.310 µg/L 0.310 0.5001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.096 µg/L 0.096 0.5001,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Trichloroethene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.270 µg/L 0.270 0.5001,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.5001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<1.00 µg/L 1.00 5.00Vinyl Acetate 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Vinyl Chloride 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500o-Xylene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 15 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97408 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:50
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00m,p-Xylene 1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113MSA
<0.21 µg/L 0.210 0.500Xylene (Total)1 10/14/23 07:00 V39113
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.2 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 07:001 MSA V39113
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 97.8 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 07:001 MSA V39113
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 98.2 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 07:001 MSA V39113
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 100 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 07:001 MSA V39113
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<0.302 µg/L 0.302 2.00Acenaphthene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.297 µg/L 0.297 2.00Acenaphthylene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.836 µg/L 0.836 2.00Anthracene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.32 µg/L 1.32 10.0
Benzidine 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.637 µg/L 0.637 2.00Benzo(a)anthracene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.02 µg/L 1.02 2.00Benzo(a)pyrene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<2.49 µg/L 2.49 5.00Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.01 µg/L 1.01 5.00Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.99 µg/L 1.99 5.00Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 10.0Benzoic Acid 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.684 µg/L 0.684 5.00
Benzyl alcohol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.468 µg/L 0.468 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 16 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97408 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:50
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<1.04 µg/L 1.04 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.08 µg/L 1.08 5.00Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<3.46 µg/L 3.46 10.0Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.004-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.83 µg/L 1.83 5.00Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.18 µg/L 1.18 5.004-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<7.38 µg/L 7.38 20.02-Chloronaphthalene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.938 µg/L 0.938 10.02-Chlorophenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.71 µg/L 1.71 5.00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.405 µg/L 0.405 2.00Chrysene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.856 µg/L 0.856 5.00Dibenzofuran 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.89 µg/L 1.89 5.00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.46 µg/L 1.46 10.02,4-Dichlorophenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.745 µg/L 0.745 5.00Diethyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.939 µg/L 0.939 5.00Dimethyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.57 µg/L 1.57 20.02,4-Dimethylphenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<2.06 µg/L 2.06 5.00Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<2.07 µg/L 2.07 10.04,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 17 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97408 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:50
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<1.92 µg/L 1.92 10.02,4-Dinitrophenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.002,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.809 µg/L 0.809 5.002,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.65 µg/L 1.65 5.00Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.250 µg/L 0.250 2.00Fluoranthene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.807 µg/L 0.807 2.00Fluorene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.979 µg/L 0.979 5.00Hexachlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<2.73 µg/L 2.73 5.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.76 µg/L 1.76 5.00Hexachloroethane 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.477 µg/L 0.477 2.00Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.444 µg/L 0.444 5.00Isophorone 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.14 µg/L 1.14 2.001-Methylnaphthalene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.666 µg/L 0.666 2.002-Methylnaphthalene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.728 µg/L 0.728 2.00Naphthalene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.905 µg/L 0.905 5.00
Nitrobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.493 µg/L 0.493 5.002-Nitrophenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.23 µg/L 1.23 10.04-Nitrophenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 5.00N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.641 µg/L 0.641 5.00N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.43 µg/L 1.43 5.00Pentachlorophenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.428 µg/L 0.428 2.00Phenanthrene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 18 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-2
97408 Matrix:
10/10/2023 13:50
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<0.651 µg/L 0.651 5.00Phenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Pyrene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<2.21 µg/L 2.21 5.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
<1.32 µg/L 1.32 5.002,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 10/12/23 21:12 V38982AMP
625.1Surrogate: Phenol-d5 25.6 Limits: 10-63%10/12/23 21:121 AMP
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 67.2 Limits: 49-118%10/12/23 21:121 AMP V38982
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 36.5 Limits: 22-84%10/12/23 21:121 AMP V38982
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 57.0 Limits: 43-123%10/12/23 21:121 AMP V38982
Surrogate: 4-Terphenyl-d14 75.8 Limits: 49-151%10/12/23 21:121 AMP V38982
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 80.5 Limits: 31-144%10/12/23 21:121 AMP V38982
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 19 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:Field Blank
97409 Matrix:
10/10/2023 14:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 10.0Acetone 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Benzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500Bromobenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00Bromochloromethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.500Bromodichloromethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.00Bromoform 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.280 µg/L 0.280 1.00Bromomethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500n-Butylbenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.500
sec-Butyl benzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.920 µg/L 0.920 2.00tert-Butyl benzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Carbon Tetrachloride 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500Chlorodibromomethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.430 µg/L 0.430 1.00Chloroethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Chloroform 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Chloromethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5002-Chlorotoluene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5004-Chlorotoluene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.500 µg/L 0.500 0.500Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 2.001,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,2-Dibromoethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.230 µg/L 0.230 0.500Dibromomethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 20 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:Field Blank
97409 Matrix:
10/10/2023 14:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.5001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.5001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<1.20 µg/L 1.20 5.00Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.240 µg/L 0.240 0.5001,1-Dichloroethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,2-Dichloroethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.5001,1-Dichloroethene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.500cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2-Dichloropropane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.130 µg/L 0.130 0.5001,3-Dichloropropane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 2.002,2-Dichloropropane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.200 µg/L 0.200 0.5001,1-Dichloropropene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.150 µg/L 0.150 0.500trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<42.0 µg/L 42.0 200
Ethanol 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Ethylbenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.350 µg/L 0.350 3.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 1.002-Hexanone 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Isopropylbenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.089 µg/L 0.089 0.5004-Isopropyl toluene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
2.18 J µg/L 0.710 5.00Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 21 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:Field Blank
97409 Matrix:
10/10/2023 14:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<0.140 µg/L 0.140 1.00Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.078 µg/L 0.078 1.004-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.330 µg/L 0.330 2.00Methylene Chloride 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.470 µg/L 0.470 1.00Naphthalene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.500n-Propylbenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Styrene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500
Tetrachloroethene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.220 µg/L 0.220 0.500Toluene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.380 µg/L 0.380 0.5001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.310 µg/L 0.310 0.5001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.160 µg/L 0.160 0.5001,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.096 µg/L 0.096 0.5001,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500Trichloroethene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.500
Trichlorofluoromethane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.270 µg/L 0.270 0.5001,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.190 µg/L 0.190 0.5001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.180 µg/L 0.180 0.5001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<1.00 µg/L 1.00 5.00Vinyl Acetate 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.170 µg/L 0.170 0.500Vinyl Chloride 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.210 µg/L 0.210 0.500o-Xylene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 22 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:Field Blank
97409 Matrix:
10/10/2023 14:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V39112 10/13/23 14:00
<0.420 µg/L 0.420 1.00m,p-Xylene 1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113MSA
<0.21 µg/L 0.210 0.500Xylene (Total)1 10/14/23 03:46 V39113
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.6 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 03:461 MSA V39113
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 99.0 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 03:461 MSA V39113
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 101 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 03:461 MSA V39113
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 102 Limits: 70-130%10/14/23 03:461 MSA V39113
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<0.302 µg/L 0.302 2.00Acenaphthene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.297 µg/L 0.297 2.00Acenaphthylene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.836 µg/L 0.836 2.00Anthracene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.32 µg/L 1.32 10.0
Benzidine 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.637 µg/L 0.637 2.00Benzo(a)anthracene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.02 µg/L 1.02 2.00Benzo(a)pyrene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<2.49 µg/L 2.49 5.00Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.01 µg/L 1.01 5.00Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.99 µg/L 1.99 5.00Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 10.0Benzoic Acid 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.684 µg/L 0.684 5.00
Benzyl alcohol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.468 µg/L 0.468 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 23 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:Field Blank
97409 Matrix:
10/10/2023 14:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<1.04 µg/L 1.04 5.00Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.08 µg/L 1.08 5.00Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<3.46 µg/L 3.46 10.0Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.004-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.83 µg/L 1.83 5.00Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.18 µg/L 1.18 5.004-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<7.38 µg/L 7.38 20.02-Chloronaphthalene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.938 µg/L 0.938 10.02-Chlorophenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.71 µg/L 1.71 5.00
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.405 µg/L 0.405 2.00Chrysene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.856 µg/L 0.856 5.00Dibenzofuran 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.001,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.89 µg/L 1.89 5.00
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.46 µg/L 1.46 10.02,4-Dichlorophenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.745 µg/L 0.745 5.00Diethyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.939 µg/L 0.939 5.00Dimethyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.57 µg/L 1.57 20.02,4-Dimethylphenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<2.06 µg/L 2.06 5.00Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<2.07 µg/L 2.07 10.04,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 24 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:Field Blank
97409 Matrix:
10/10/2023 14:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<1.92 µg/L 1.92 10.02,4-Dinitrophenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.002,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.809 µg/L 0.809 5.002,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.65 µg/L 1.65 5.00Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.250 µg/L 0.250 2.00Fluoranthene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.807 µg/L 0.807 2.00Fluorene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.979 µg/L 0.979 5.00Hexachlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<2.73 µg/L 2.73 5.00Hexachlorobutadiene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.00
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.76 µg/L 1.76 5.00Hexachloroethane 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.477 µg/L 0.477 2.00Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.444 µg/L 0.444 5.00Isophorone 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.14 µg/L 1.14 2.001-Methylnaphthalene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.666 µg/L 0.666 2.002-Methylnaphthalene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.728 µg/L 0.728 2.00Naphthalene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.905 µg/L 0.905 5.00
Nitrobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.493 µg/L 0.493 5.002-Nitrophenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.23 µg/L 1.23 10.04-Nitrophenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.10 µg/L 1.10 5.00N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.641 µg/L 0.641 5.00N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.43 µg/L 1.43 5.00Pentachlorophenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.428 µg/L 0.428 2.00Phenanthrene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 25 of 40
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-284-0002
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Dr. Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 10/11/2023
Silver Creek Airport
Report Date : 10/17/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:Field Blank
97409 Matrix:
10/10/2023 14:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V38943 10/12/23 09:56
<0.651 µg/L 0.651 5.00Phenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<0.434 µg/L 0.434 2.00Pyrene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<2.21 µg/L 2.21 5.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
<1.32 µg/L 1.32 5.002,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 10/12/23 21:34 V38982AMP
625.1Surrogate: Phenol-d5 25.2 Limits: 10-63%10/12/23 21:341 AMP
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 72.6 Limits: 49-118%10/12/23 21:341 AMP V38982
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 37.0 Limits: 22-84%10/12/23 21:341 AMP V38982
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 64.0 Limits: 43-123%10/12/23 21:341 AMP V38982
Surrogate: 4-Terphenyl-d14 82.2 Limits: 49-151%10/12/23 21:341 AMP V38982
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 82.8 Limits: 31-144%10/12/23 21:341 AMP V38982
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 26 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V39113QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V39112
Associated Lab Samples: 97407, 97408, 97409
LRB-V39112 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
10/14/23 02:5710.01.80<1.80µg/LAcetone
10/14/23 02:570.5000.180<0.180µg/LBenzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.210<0.210µg/LBromobenzene
10/14/23 02:571.000.420<0.420µg/LBromochloromethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.160<0.160µg/LBromodichloromethane
10/14/23 02:575.001.50<1.50µg/LBromoform
10/14/23 02:571.000.280<0.280µg/LBromomethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.180<0.180µg/Ln-Butylbenzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.200<0.200µg/Lsec-Butyl benzene
10/14/23 02:572.000.920<0.920µg/Ltert-Butyl benzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.180<0.180µg/LCarbon Tetrachloride
10/14/23 02:570.5000.190<0.190µg/LChlorobenzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.190<0.190µg/LChlorodibromomethane
10/14/23 02:571.000.430<0.430µg/LChloroethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.220<0.220µg/LChloroform
10/14/23 02:570.5000.220<0.220µg/LChloromethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.200<0.200µg/L2-Chlorotoluene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.200<0.200µg/L4-Chlorotoluene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.500<0.500µg/LDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)
10/14/23 02:572.001.10<1.10µg/L1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.200<0.200µg/L1,2-Dibromoethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.230<0.230µg/LDibromomethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.220<0.220µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.210<0.210µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene
10/14/23 02:575.001.20<1.20µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.240<0.240µg/L1,1-Dichloroethane
Page 1 of 12Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 27 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V39113QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V39112
Associated Lab Samples: 97407, 97408, 97409
LRB-V39112 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
10/14/23 02:570.5000.150<0.150µg/L1,2-Dichloroethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.150<0.150µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.200<0.200µg/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.180<0.180µg/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,2-Dichloropropane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.130<0.130µg/L1,3-Dichloropropane
10/14/23 02:572.000.210<0.210µg/L2,2-Dichloropropane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.200<0.200µg/L1,1-Dichloropropene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.210<0.210µg/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.150<0.150µg/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10/14/23 02:5720042.0<42.0µg/LEthanol
10/14/23 02:570.5000.170<0.170µg/LEthylbenzene
10/14/23 02:573.000.350<0.350µg/LHexachlorobutadiene
10/14/23 02:571.000.380<0.380µg/L2-Hexanone
10/14/23 02:570.5000.180<0.180µg/LIsopropylbenzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.089<0.089µg/L4-Isopropyl toluene
10/14/23 02:575.000.710<0.710µg/LMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
10/14/23 02:571.000.140<0.140µg/LMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
10/14/23 02:571.000.078<0.078µg/L4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
10/14/23 02:572.000.330<0.330µg/LMethylene Chloride
10/14/23 02:571.000.470<0.470µg/LNaphthalene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.190<0.190µg/Ln-Propylbenzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.220<0.220µg/LStyrene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.220<0.220µg/LTetrachloroethene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.220<0.220µg/LToluene
Page 2 of 12Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 28 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V39113QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V39112
Associated Lab Samples: 97407, 97408, 97409
LRB-V39112 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
10/14/23 02:570.5000.380<0.380µg/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.310<0.310µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.096<0.096µg/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.180<0.180µg/LTrichloroethene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.180<0.180µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.270<0.270µg/L1,2,3-Trichloropropane
10/14/23 02:570.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
10/14/23 02:570.5000.180<0.180µg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
10/14/23 02:575.001.00<1.00µg/LVinyl Acetate
10/14/23 02:570.5000.170<0.170µg/LVinyl Chloride
10/14/23 02:570.5000.210<0.210µg/Lo-Xylene
10/14/23 02:571.000.420<0.420µg/Lm,p-Xylene
10/14/23 02:574-Bromofluorobenzene (S)98.8 70-130
10/14/23 02:57Dibromofluoromethane (S)98.4 70-130
10/14/23 02:571,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)101 70-130
10/14/23 02:57Toluene-d8 (S)101 70-130
LCS-V39112 LCSD-V39112Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
25.2 63.067.226.940.0µg/LAcetone 40-160 6.5 20.0
20.4 10210320.620.0µg/LBenzene 70-130 0.9 20.0
20.1 10110120.120.0µg/LBromobenzene 70-130 0.0 20.0
19.6 98.099.519.920.0µg/LBromochloromethane 70-130 1.5 20.0
19.9 99.599.519.920.0µg/LBromodichloromethane 70-130 0.0 20.0
Page 3 of 12Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 29 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V39113QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V39112
LCS-V39112 LCSD-V39112Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
19.0 95.097.519.520.0µg/LBromoform 70-130 2.5 20.0
20.1 10189.517.920.0µg/LBromomethane 60-140 11.5 20.0
20.7 10410120.220.0µg/Ln-Butylbenzene 70-130 2.4 20.0
20.7 10410320.620.0µg/Lsec-Butyl benzene 70-130 0.4 20.0
20.3 10210020.020.0µg/Ltert-Butyl benzene 70-130 1.4 20.0
20.7 10410420.720.0µg/LCarbon Tetrachloride 70-130 0.0 20.0
20.8 10410320.520.0µg/LChlorobenzene 70-130 1.4 20.0
19.7 98.599.019.820.0µg/LChlorodibromomethane 70-130 0.5 20.0
13.7 68.568.513.720.0µg/LChloroethane 60-140 0.0 20.0
20.1 10199.519.920.0µg/LChloroform 70-130 1.0 20.0
19.3 96.597.519.520.0µg/LChloromethane 60-140 1.0 20.0
20.6 10310220.420.0µg/L2-Chlorotoluene 70-130 0.9 20.0
20.6 10310220.420.0µg/L4-Chlorotoluene 70-130 0.9 20.0
20.1 10110220.320.0µg/LDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)70-130 0.9 20.0
20.1 10111021.920.0µg/L1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 70-130 8.5 20.0
19.4 97.010120.220.0µg/L1,2-Dibromoethane 70-130 4.0 20.0
19.9 99.510220.420.0µg/LDibromomethane 70-130 2.4 20.0
21.2 10610320.620.0µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 2.8 20.0
20.8 10410220.320.0µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 2.4 20.0
20.3 10210120.120.0µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 0.9 20.0
20.2 10110020.020.0µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane 60-140 0.9 20.0
19.9 99.599.019.820.0µg/L1,1-Dichloroethane 70-130 0.5 20.0
19.4 97.010020.020.0µg/L1,2-Dichloroethane 70-130 3.0 20.0
20.7 10410521.020.0µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene 70-130 1.4 20.0
20.2 10110120.120.0µg/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130 0.4 20.0
20.0 10010220.320.0µg/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130 1.4 20.0
Page 4 of 12Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 30 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V39113QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V39112
LCS-V39112 LCSD-V39112Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
20.5 10310320.620.0µg/L1,2-Dichloropropane 70-130 0.4 20.0
19.4 97.099.519.920.0µg/L1,3-Dichloropropane 70-130 2.5 20.0
18.4 92.093.518.720.0µg/L2,2-Dichloropropane 70-130 1.6 20.0
21.1 10610721.320.0µg/L1,1-Dichloropropene 70-130 0.9 20.0
19.1 95.598.019.620.0µg/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130 2.5 20.0
18.7 93.596.519.320.0µg/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130 3.1 20.0
419 83.893.4467500µg/LEthanol 60-140 10.8 20.0
20.3 10210120.120.0µg/LEthylbenzene 70-130 0.9 20.0
20.3 10210220.420.0µg/LHexachlorobutadiene 70-130 0.4 20.0
16.8 84.095.519.120.0µg/L2-Hexanone 60-140 12.8 20.0
20.8 10410220.420.0µg/LIsopropylbenzene 70-130 1.9 20.0
21.2 10610621.220.0µg/L4-Isopropyl toluene 70-130 0.0 20.0
15.1 75.580.016.020.0µg/LMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)60-140 5.7 20.0
19.7 98.510320.620.0µg/LMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)70-130 4.4 20.0
19.0 95.010420.720.0µg/L4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 60-140 8.5 20.0
18.7 93.595.019.020.0µg/LMethylene Chloride 70-130 1.5 20.0
18.2 91.097.519.520.0µg/LNaphthalene 70-130 6.8 20.0
20.6 10310220.420.0µg/Ln-Propylbenzene 70-130 0.9 20.0
20.3 10210320.620.0µg/LStyrene 70-130 1.4 20.0
20.9 10510520.920.0µg/L1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130 0.0 20.0
19.9 99.510220.320.0µg/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130 1.9 20.0
20.5 10310520.920.0µg/LTetrachloroethene 70-130 1.9 20.0
20.2 10110220.420.0µg/LToluene 70-130 0.9 20.0
21.8 10911523.020.0µg/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 70-130 5.3 20.0
21.0 10510821.520.0µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70-130 2.3 20.0
20.2 10110020.020.0µg/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane 70-130 0.9 20.0
Page 5 of 12Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 31 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V39113QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V39112
LCS-V39112 LCSD-V39112Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
19.1 95.510120.220.0µg/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane 70-130 5.5 20.0
20.6 10310320.520.0µg/LTrichloroethene 70-130 0.4 20.0
21.5 10810621.120.0µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane 60-140 1.8 20.0
18.6 93.098.019.620.0µg/L1,2,3-Trichloropropane 70-130 5.2 20.0
20.8 10410420.720.0µg/L1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 70-130 0.4 20.0
20.8 10410420.720.0µg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 70-130 0.4 20.0
18.9 94.510120.120.0µg/LVinyl Acetate 60-140 6.1 20.0
20.4 10299.019.820.0µg/LVinyl Chloride 60-140 2.9 20.0
20.2 10110120.120.0µg/Lo-Xylene 70-130 0.4 20.0
42.4 10610642.240.0µg/Lm,p-Xylene 70-130 0.4 20.0
98.496.04-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
97.699.0Dibromofluoromethane (S)70-130
97.61001,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)70-130
101101Toluene-d8 (S)70-130
Page 6 of 12Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 32 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V38982QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V38943
Associated Lab Samples: 97407, 97408, 97409
LRB-V38943 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
10/12/23 18:342.000.302<0.302µg/LAcenaphthene
10/12/23 18:342.000.297<0.297µg/LAcenaphthylene
10/12/23 18:342.000.836<0.836µg/LAnthracene
10/12/23 18:3410.01.32<1.32µg/LBenzidine
10/12/23 18:342.000.637<0.637µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene
10/12/23 18:342.001.02<1.02µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene
10/12/23 18:345.002.49<2.49µg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene
10/12/23 18:345.001.01<1.01µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
10/12/23 18:345.001.99<1.99µg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene
10/12/23 18:3410.01.10<1.10µg/LBenzoic Acid
10/12/23 18:345.000.684<0.684µg/LBenzyl alcohol
10/12/23 18:345.000.468<0.468µg/LBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
10/12/23 18:345.001.04<1.04µg/LBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
10/12/23 18:345.001.08<1.08µg/LBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
10/12/23 18:3410.03.46<3.46µg/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
10/12/23 18:345.001.11<1.11µg/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
10/12/23 18:345.001.83<1.83µg/LButyl benzyl phthalate
10/12/23 18:345.001.18<1.18µg/L4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
10/12/23 18:3420.07.38<7.38µg/L2-Chloronaphthalene
10/12/23 18:3410.00.938<0.938µg/L2-Chlorophenol
10/12/23 18:345.001.71<1.71µg/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
10/12/23 18:342.000.405<0.405µg/LChrysene
10/12/23 18:342.000.434<0.434µg/LDibenz(a,h)anthracene
10/12/23 18:345.000.856<0.856µg/LDibenzofuran
10/12/23 18:345.002.00<2.00µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene
10/12/23 18:345.002.00<2.00µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene
10/12/23 18:345.002.05<2.05µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Page 7 of 12Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 33 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V38982QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V38943
Associated Lab Samples: 97407, 97408, 97409
LRB-V38943 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
10/12/23 18:345.001.89<1.89µg/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
10/12/23 18:3410.01.46<1.46µg/L2,4-Dichlorophenol
10/12/23 18:345.000.745<0.745µg/LDiethyl phthalate
10/12/23 18:345.000.939<0.939µg/LDimethyl phthalate
10/12/23 18:3420.01.57<1.57µg/L2,4-Dimethylphenol
10/12/23 18:345.002.06<2.06µg/LDi-n-butyl phthalate
10/12/23 18:3410.02.07<2.07µg/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
10/12/23 18:3410.01.92<1.92µg/L2,4-Dinitrophenol
10/12/23 18:345.001.11<1.11µg/L2,4-Dinitrotoluene
10/12/23 18:345.000.809<0.809µg/L2,6-Dinitrotoluene
10/12/23 18:345.001.65<1.65µg/LDi-n-Octyl Phthalate
10/12/23 18:342.000.250<0.250µg/LFluoranthene
10/12/23 18:342.000.807<0.807µg/LFluorene
10/12/23 18:345.000.979<0.979µg/LHexachlorobenzene
10/12/23 18:345.002.73<2.73µg/LHexachlorobutadiene
10/12/23 18:345.002.05<2.05µg/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene
10/12/23 18:345.001.76<1.76µg/LHexachloroethane
10/12/23 18:342.000.477<0.477µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
10/12/23 18:345.000.444<0.444µg/LIsophorone
10/12/23 18:342.001.14<1.14µg/L1-Methylnaphthalene
10/12/23 18:342.000.666<0.666µg/L2-Methylnaphthalene
10/12/23 18:342.000.728<0.728µg/LNaphthalene
10/12/23 18:345.000.905<0.905µg/LNitrobenzene
10/12/23 18:345.000.493<0.493µg/L2-Nitrophenol
10/12/23 18:3410.01.23<1.23µg/L4-Nitrophenol
10/12/23 18:345.001.10<1.10µg/LN-Nitrosodiphenylamine
10/12/23 18:345.000.641<0.641µg/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
Page 8 of 12Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 34 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V38982QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V38943
Associated Lab Samples: 97407, 97408, 97409
LRB-V38943 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
10/12/23 18:345.001.43<1.43µg/LPentachlorophenol
10/12/23 18:342.000.428<0.428µg/LPhenanthrene
10/12/23 18:345.000.651<0.651µg/LPhenol
10/12/23 18:342.000.434<0.434µg/LPyrene
10/12/23 18:345.002.21<2.21µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10/12/23 18:345.001.32<1.32µg/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
10/12/23 18:342-Fluorobiphenyl (S)73.6 49-118
10/12/23 18:342-Fluorophenol (S)40.9 22-84
10/12/23 18:34Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)63.2 43-123
10/12/23 18:344-Terphenyl-d14 (S)83.0 49-151
10/12/23 18:342,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)87.6 31-144
10/12/23 18:34Phenol-d5 (S)27.6 10-63
LCS-V38943 LCSD-V38943Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
32.8 65.674.437.250.0µg/LAcenaphthene 47-145 12.5 20.0
32.7 65.476.438.250.0µg/LAcenaphthylene 33-145 15.5 20.0
39.9 79.886.443.250.0µg/LAnthracene 27-133 7.9 20.0
12.6 25.263.231.650.0µg/LBenzidine 15-150 85.9*20.0
39.2 78.484.642.350.0µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene 33-143 7.6 20.0
43.9 87.894.247.150.0µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene 17-163 7.0 20.0
40.9 81.887.443.750.0µg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene 24-159 6.6 20.0
40.0 80.086.043.050.0µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 10-219 7.2 20.0
41.2 82.489.244.650.0µg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene 11-162 7.9 20.0
19.7 39.436.818.450.0µg/LBenzoic Acid 10-125 6.8 20.0
Page 9 of 12* QC Fail Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 35 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V38982QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V38943
LCS-V38943 LCSD-V38943Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
31.8 63.669.834.950.0µg/LBenzyl alcohol 16-107 9.2 20.0
28.9 57.865.632.850.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 33-184 12.6 20.0
26.2 52.460.430.250.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 12-158 14.1 20.0
25.4 50.858.629.350.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 36-166 14.2 20.0
43.1 86.292.846.450.0µg/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 10-158 7.3 20.0
37.0 74.081.440.750.0µg/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 53-127 9.5 20.0
40.7 81.487.243.650.0µg/LButyl benzyl phthalate 10-152 6.8 20.0
31.8 63.668.834.450.0µg/L4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 22-147 7.8 20.0
31.3 62.674.637.350.0µg/L2-Chloronaphthalene 60-118 17.4 20.0
28.7 57.465.832.950.0µg/L2-Chlorophenol 23-134 13.6 20.0
35.0 70.079.039.550.0µg/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 25-158 12.0 20.0
40.5 81.088.044.050.0µg/LChrysene 17-168 8.2 20.0
31.1 62.269.834.950.0µg/LDibenz(a,h)anthracene 10-227 11.5 20.0
35.2 70.480.640.350.0µg/LDibenzofuran 39-114 13.5 20.0
24.0 48.054.627.350.0µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 32-129 12.8 20.0
22.6 45.252.026.050.0µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 20-124 13.9 20.0
21.6 43.250.025.050.0µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 20-124 14.5 20.0
34.2 68.474.837.450.0µg/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 10-262 8.9 20.0
31.8 63.671.035.550.0µg/L2,4-Dichlorophenol 39-135 10.9 20.0
39.3 78.685.642.850.0µg/LDiethyl phthalate 10-114 8.5 20.0
39.8 79.687.443.750.0µg/LDimethyl phthalate 10-112 9.3 20.0
39.7 79.488.044.050.0µg/L2,4-Dimethylphenol 32-119 10.2 20.0
43.2 86.491.845.950.0µg/LDi-n-butyl phthalate 10-118 6.0 20.0
38.8 77.683.641.850.0µg/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 10-181 7.4 20.0
38.9 77.880.240.150.0µg/L2,4-Dinitrophenol 10-191 3.0 20.0
41.6 83.291.045.550.0µg/L2,4-Dinitrotoluene 39-139 8.9 20.0
Page 10 of 12Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 36 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V38982QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V38943
LCS-V38943 LCSD-V38943Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
40.9 81.888.444.250.0µg/L2,6-Dinitrotoluene 50-158 7.7 20.0
43.8 87.692.846.450.0µg/LDi-n-Octyl Phthalate 10-146 5.7 20.0
40.3 80.686.843.450.0µg/LFluoranthene 26-137 7.4 20.0
37.2 74.482.641.350.0µg/LFluorene 59-121 10.4 20.0
39.8 79.689.244.650.0µg/LHexachlorobenzene 10-152 11.3 20.0
24.7 49.456.628.350.0µg/LHexachlorobutadiene 24-116 13.5 20.0
19.2 38.448.224.150.0µg/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene 32-117 22.6*20.0
21.0 42.049.824.950.0µg/LHexachloroethane 40-113 16.9 20.0
40.0 80.086.243.150.0µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 10-171 7.4 20.0
27.8 55.661.830.950.0µg/LIsophorone 21-196 10.5 20.0
26.1 52.259.429.750.0µg/L1-Methylnaphthalene 40-135 12.9 20.0
26.1 52.260.430.250.0µg/L2-Methylnaphthalene 18-121 14.5 20.0
24.2 48.456.628.350.0µg/LNaphthalene 21-133 15.6 20.0
26.9 53.861.430.750.0µg/LNitrobenzene 35-180 13.1 20.0
28.3 56.663.831.950.0µg/L2-Nitrophenol 29-182 11.9 20.0
20.4 40.842.221.150.0µg/L4-Nitrophenol 10-132 3.3 20.0
45.5 91.098.649.350.0µg/LN-Nitrosodiphenylamine 69-152 8.0 20.0
30.6 61.271.235.650.0µg/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 10-230 15.1 20.0
54.1 10811356.750.0µg/LPentachlorophenol 14-176 4.6 20.0
39.9 79.886.243.150.0µg/LPhenanthrene 54-120 7.7 20.0
13.9 27.830.415.250.0µg/LPhenol 10-112 8.9 20.0
41.4 82.889.044.550.0µg/LPyrene 52-115 7.2 20.0
23.8 47.654.227.150.0µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 44-142 12.9 20.0
36.0 72.082.241.150.0µg/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 37-144 13.2 20.0
63.878.22-Fluorobiphenyl (S)49-118
36.441.52-Fluorophenol (S)22-84
Page 11 of 12* QC Fail Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 37 of 40
Quality Control Data
23-284-0002Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Silver Creek Airport
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V38982QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V38943
LCS-V38943 LCSD-V38943Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
52.460.4Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)43-123
77.887.64-Terphenyl-d14 (S)49-151
82.395.32,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)31-144
24.728.3Phenol-d5 (S)10-63
Page 12 of 12Date:10/17/2023 03:35 PM
Page 38 of 40
Fed Ex
UPS
US Postal
Client
Lab
Courier
Other :
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number:
Customer Name:
Report Number:23-284-0002
CES Group
00012
Shipping Method
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
Thermometer ID:IRT-15 5.3C
Chain of Custody (COC) present?Yes No
Yes No Not Present
Yes No Not Present
Yes No
COC agrees with sample label(s)? Yes No
COC properly completed
Samples in proper containers?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
All samples received within holding time?
Cooler temperature in compliance?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes NoCooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
Yes No
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/ASoil VOA method 5035 – compliance criteria met
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
Water - VOA vials free of headspace Yes No N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
High concentration pre-weighed (methanol -14 d) Low conc pre-weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
High concentration container (48 hr)
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Number of coolers/boxes received
Yes No
1
Signature:Caitlyn Cummins Date & Time:10/11/2023 09:57:41
Special precautions or instructions included?
Comments:
Page 39 of 40
Page 40 of 40