HomeMy WebLinkAboutWS-2669_6146_CA_MRP_20180511Federal/State-Lead Groundwater Monitoring Report
Moore’s Exxon
NCDEQ Incident #6146
7390 NC Highway 16
Glendale Springs, Ashe County, North Carolina 28694
ATC Project #SLP0614601
May 11, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 SITE IDENTIFICATION .......................................................................................1
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................2
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................3
3.1 Site Characterization ................................................................................3
3.2 Site Background .......................................................................................3
3.3 Site and Regional Geology ......................................................................5
3.4 Site and Regional Hydrogeology .............................................................6
4.0 GROUNDWATER CHARACTERIZATION.......................................................6
4.1 Water Supply Wells .................................................................................6
4.2 Groundwater Levels .................................................................................7
4.3 Groundwater Quality ...............................................................................7
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................8
TABLES
Table 1 Water Supply Well Information
Table 2 Current Water Supply Well Analytical Data
Table 3 Historical Water Supply Well Analytical Data
Table 4 Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 5 Natural Attenuation Parameters
Table 6 Summary of Current Analytical Data
Table 7 Historical Groundwater Analytical Data
FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Water Supply Well Location Map
Figure 3 Site Map
Figure 4 Groundwater Elevation Contour Map
Figure 5 Groundwater Quality Map
APPENDICES
Appendix A Field Notes
Appendix B Laboratory Analytical Results
Federal/State-Lead Groundwater Monitoring Report May 11, 2018
Moore’s Exxon – NCDEQ Incident #6146 ATC Project #SLP0614601
2
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ATC Associates of North Carolina, P.C. (ATC) has completed a Federal/State-Lead Groundwater
Monitoring Report (GMR), documenting a December 12, 2017, monitoring event of eight on-site
monitoring wells and surrounding water supply wells at the former Moore’s Exxon, located at 7390
NC Highway 16 in Glendale Springs, Ashe County, North Carolina. The GMR is being performed
based on a November 20, 2017, Task Authorization (TA-1) by the Trust Fund Branch of the
Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section, Division of Waste Management, North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). The work is being performed as part of the State
Lead Contract #N17004 between NCDEQ and ATC.
A release from a former kerosene UST at the site was discovered during its removal in 1990. A
subsequent release was identified in 1991 during the removal of one of the site’s former gasoline
USTs. The site has been demolished and is now the site of the Glendale Springs Volunteer Fire
Department. This GMR documents impact conditions related to the former UST system.
As part of this Task Authorization, ATC collected groundwater samples from eight site-related
monitoring wells. The site groundwater monitoring wells were gauged for depth to water, sampled,
and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). ATC also collected samples from three water
supply wells and analyzed each sample for VOCs. Water supply well WSW-3 was not sampled due
to the water being turned off at the property. The findings from the monitoring event indicate the
following:
Free product was not identified in the monitoring well network;
Monitoring well MW-1 contained a concentration of benzene above the Gross
Contamination Level (GCL);
Monitoring well MW-1 also contained concentrations of nine constituents above the North
Carolina Groundwater Standards (2L Standards; Title 15A, NCAC, Subchapter 2L, Part
.0202);
Monitoring wells MW-1R and MW-3R contained detectable concentrations petroleum
constituents below 2L Standards;
Monitoring wells MW-5, MW-10R, MW-11, MW-12, and MW-13 did not contain
detectable concentrations of petroleum constituents;
Based on the limited monitoring well network, groundwater appears to flow to the east-
northeast;
Concentrations of MTBE, 2-butanone (MEK), and diisopropyl ether (DIPE) were
detected below 2L Standards in water supply well WSW-7414; and
No detectable concentrations of petroleum compounds were identified in water supply
wells WSW-26 or WSW-121.
Appreciable remaining subsurface impact by petroleum VOCs above GCLs and 2L Standards is
present in groundwater beneath the site. ATC recommends a ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey
to investigate the possibility of additional tanks at the site. ATC also recommends drilling and
sampling of a soil boring in the former UST pit adjacent to monitoring well MW-1 to assess the
vertical extent of petroleum-impacted vadose-zone soil. Following soil assessment, ATC would
then develop a strategy to remediate this area.
Federal/State-Lead Groundwater Monitoring Report May 11, 2018
Moore’s Exxon – NCDEQ Incident #6146 ATC Project #SLP0614601
3
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 Site Characterization
The NCDEQ retained ATC to provide environmental consulting services for the former Moore’s
Exxon, which is located at 7390 NC Highway 16 in Glendale Springs, Ashe County, North
Carolina. Figure 1 depicts the site on a topographic map. The former site building has been
demolished. The site is currently occupied by the Glendale Springs Volunteer Fire Department.
Municipal water is not provided to the surrounding area and properties within 1,000 feet of the site
obtain potable water from private supply wells. Twenty-six water supply wells have been previously
identified within 1,000 feet of the site.
3.2 Site Background
Six USTs were formerly associated with the site. Two (2) 2,000-gallon gasoline USTs, one (1)
550-gallon kerosene UST, one (1) 3,000-compartmentalized gasoline UST, one (1) 1,000-gallon
gasoline UST, and a heating oil UST of unknown quantity and size. A release of 50 gallons of
kerosene was originally reported in 1990 during the removal of the 550-gallon kerosene UST.
Approximately 10 yards of soil were excavated to remove contamination from the release. Due
to the elevated levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in the closure assessment soil
samples, a new release was attributed to one of the 2,000-gallon gasoline USTs. A third release
was likely associated with the 1,000-gallon gasoline UST due to the presence of a mixture of
petroleum and water and several holes in the tank. In 1997, over one foot of free phase product
was gauged in monitoring well MW-1, which is located near the former 2,000-gallon UST
associated with the release.
Enviro-Tank, Inc. conducted an investigation of the tank basins at the west, south, and east sides
of the former building in 1990. Samples collected from the eastern side of the building in the
kerosene tank basin yielded total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) concentrations of 8,850
milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
During the removal of one of the 2,000-gallon gasoline USTs and the in-place abandonment of
one of the other 2,000-gallon USTs, soil samples were collected, which indicated a second
release occurred at the site. TPH concentrations of 24 mg/kg were detected in the soil sample
collected at the southern boundary of the site.
Soil samples were collected at the southern and eastern edges of the site at approximate depths of
13.5 to 15 feet in May 1996 by Law Environmental. Laboratory analysis indicated that two
samples, located near one of the 2,000-gallon gasoline USTs and the 1,000-gallon gasoline UST
at the southern boundary of the site, contained TPH concentrations of 9,700 mg/kg and 2,000
mg/kg.
In June 1996, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) discovered the
presence of free phase petroleum during an easement assessment. In October 1996, Salem
Environmental installed four groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4) to 25 feet
below ground surface (ft bgs). Two AFVR events were reportedly performed by Seagraves Oil
Federal/State-Lead Groundwater Monitoring Report May 11, 2018
Moore’s Exxon – NCDEQ Incident #6146 ATC Project #SLP0614601
4
Company, at the locations of monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2; however, no documentation of
the events was provided.
In March, April, June, and July 1997, additional monitoring wells MW-5 through MW-10 were
installed by Salem Environmental. In July 1997, over one foot of free phase product was
detected in monitoring well MW-1. Prior to an AFVR event in 1998, 2.73 feet of free phase
product was detected.
In June 2000 four soil samples and a composite sample were collected by TRC Triangle during
the removal of the 3,000-gallon gasoline UST. The June 2000 samples were below detection
limits for TPH analysis. Additional monitoring wells MW-11 and MW-12 were installed
upgradient of the source area, and monitoring well MW-13 was installed at the location of the
former source area.
In July 2002, the previously abandoned 1,000-gallon gasoline UST was removed from the site.
Environmental Investigations, Inc. collected two soil samples during the removal process. TPH
was detected at concentrations ranging from 730 mg/kg to 3,400 mg/kg.
In a monitoring report dated December 29, 2003, Geonetics Corporation stated that most of the
monitoring wells had been destroyed. During an April 13, 2010, groundwater monitoring event,
monitoring wells MW-11 and MW-12 were the only monitoring wells located.
In February 2011, property access for replacement monitoring well installation was granted by
the Glendale Springs Fire Chief and Terry Sheets, an adjacent property owner. Monitoring wells
MW-1R and MW-3R were installed on-site, and a downgradient monitoring well, MW-10R was
also installed. Two of the wells that were thought to have been destroyed were located (MW-1
and MW-5). Force Environmental sampled monitoring wells MW-1R, MW-3R, MW-5, MW-
10R, MW-11, and MW-12. Monitoring well MW-1 contained detectable free product and was
not sampled. The analytical results from the sampling event indicated concentrations greater than
the North Carolina 2L Standards for Groundwater in monitoring wells MW-1R and MW-3R.
ATC performed groundwater monitoring activities at the site on July 8, 2014. Results from the
groundwater monitoring event indicated VOC impact, including free product detected in
monitoring well MW-1 at a thickness of 0.11 feet. Petroleum constituents were detected in all of
the sampled monitoring wells below 2L Standards except monitoring well MW-3R which
contained concentrations of benzene, naphthalene, and n-propylbenzene exceeding 2L Standards.
During the groundwater monitoring event, ATC also performed a receptor survey update which
identified water supply wells within 1,500 feet. Based on the survey and lack of municipal water
service in the area, developed properties within 1,500 feet of the site are considered possible
receptors. At the conclusion of the groundwater monitoring event, ATC recommended the
installation of an additional monitoring well to further assess and delineate the petroleum
subsurface impact.
On November 7, 2014, ATC and a subcontractor performed a ten-hour AFVR event using
monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3R as extraction points. Prior to performing the AFVR event,
wells MW-1 and MW-3R were gauged for liquid levels, and no free product was detected in the
monitoring wells. The AFVR event generated approximately 673 gallons of petroleum impacted
Federal/State-Lead Groundwater Monitoring Report May 11, 2018
Moore’s Exxon – NCDEQ Incident #6146 ATC Project #SLP0614601
5
groundwater. The AFVR subcontractor did not provide vapor concentration measurements. ATC
also installed groundwater monitoring well MW-13 to the south of the site to further delineate
the subsurface impact. Following the installation of the monitoring well, well MW-13 was
sampled and no detectable concentrations of petroleum impact were identified.
On July 8, 2015, ATC completed a groundwater monitoring event of the monitoring well
network and water supply wells within 500 feet of the site. Analysis of the groundwater indicated
a concentration of benzene in monitoring well MW-1 above GCLs. Additional compounds above
2L Standards were identified in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3R. Water supply well
analytical data indicated MTBE impact below 2L Standards in water supply wells WSW-26 and
WSW-7414. Diisopropyl ether was also identified in water supply well WSW-7414 at a
concentration below 2L Standards. Acetone was identified in each sampled water supply well.
Additional confirmation sampling did not identify acetone in the water supply wells, and the
presence of acetone was likely attributable to laboratory cleaning methods and not site impact.
Based on the concentrations identified in the water supply well samples, the NCDEQ performed
a Health Risk Evaluation for the wells in which no restrictions were recommended on the use of
the wells.
On March 1, 2016, ATC completed a monitoring event which indicated benzene impact above the
GCL in well MW-1. Ten additional petroleum constituents were identified in monitoring well MW-
1 at concentrations above 2L Standards. During the July 8, 2015, groundwater monitoring event,
monitoring well MW-3R contained concentrations of four constituents above 2L Standards;
however, during March 2016 groundwater monitoring event, no concentrations of petroleum
constituents identified in monitoring well MW-3R exceeded 2L Standards. Monitoring wells MW-
1R, MW-5, MW-10R, MW-11, MW-12, and MW-13 did not contain detectable concentrations of
petroleum compounds.
3.3 Site and Regional Geology
According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina, dated 1985, the property lies within the Blue
Ridge Physiographic Province, in the Alligator Back Formation of the Ocoee Supergroup. The
crystalline metamorphic rock of the Alligator Back Formation is at the site is a finely laminated
to thin-layered with local occurrence of other metamorphic rock types. In most areas, the upper
Blue Ridge subsurface consists of unconsolidated residual soil, variously known as residuum,
saprolite, or partially weathered rock (PWR) that has developed from in-place weathering of the
underlying metamorphic bedrock. The residual soils vary in consistency and depth based on local
conditions. Bedrock can be found at depths ranging from the surface as outcrops down to greater
than 100 feet in areas of easily weathered rock types. Sites near streams and rivers in the Blue
Ridge may also contain alluvium deposited during flood events.
Monitoring well installation information from an August 1, 1997, Comprehensive Site
Assessment by Geonetics Corporation indicated that the site subsurface consisted of saprolite. A
monitoring well was installed into the deep aquifer (MW-9) was screened in fractured bedrock
which was encountered at approximately 50 feet ft bgs. Bedrock monitoring well MW-9 was
destroyed during road widening activities. Historical sampling of monitoring well MW-9 did not
indicate petroleum impact to the bedrock well.
Federal/State-Lead Groundwater Monitoring Report May 11, 2018
Moore’s Exxon – NCDEQ Incident #6146 ATC Project #SLP0614601
6
3.4 Site and Regional Hydrogeology
The shallow aquifer occurrence varies in depth from ground surface at springs, creeks, and rivers
to as deep as 50 feet or more beneath upland surfaces in some parts of the Blue Ridge. ATC
encountered groundwater at depths ranging from 6.60 feet to 25.02 feet below the tops of casing
in the monitoring wells at the site during the December 12, 2017, monitoring event. Water in the
alluvium or unconsolidated residual material, including saprolite and PWR, usually behaves as
an unconfined aquifer, or water table, and will yield water with head elevation equivalent to the
first elevation where water was encountered. Permeability varies with lithology and is typically
relatively low in residual soils, with higher permeability in saprolite or PWR due to relict rock
texture and variable susceptibility to weathering exhibited by different minerals in the rock.
Groundwater flow in residual soils or alluvium is usually in rough concurrence with local
topographic conditions and is toward local drainage features. Based on the existing site wells, the
groundwater flow is to the east-northeast.
The bedrock fractures or other planar features of the Blue Ridge Physiographic Province
generally constitute the bedrock aquifer, with the surrounding rock material being effectively
impermeable. Along with fractures, contacts between rock bodies probably constitute zones of
significant groundwater occurrence in the bedrock. The surrounding material and overlying
residuum tend to make the bedrock aquifer a semi-confined aquifer. That is, the overlying water
and soil weight normally results in pressure that causes water in a borehole, which intersects a
fracture or other feature, to rise above the elevation of the fracture or feature. Most modern
water supply wells in the Blue Ridge consist of a casing set through the residual soils into the
upper bedrock followed by an open borehole into the bedrock where water bearing fractures
were encountered during the drilling. Except for attempted sampling of nearby water supply
wells, evaluation of bedrock water quality or hydrology was beyond the scope of the GMR.
4.0 GROUNDWATER CHARACTERIZATION
4.1 Water Supply Wells
On December 12, 2017, ATC collected groundwater samples from water supply wells WSW-26
(107 Trading Post Road), WSW-121 (121 Trading Post Road), WSW-7414 (7414 NC Highway
16). ATC attempted to sample water supply well WSW-3 (231 J W Luke Road); however, water
was turned off at the property. Table 1 summarizes water supply well information. Figure 2
depicts the locations of the water supply wells. Field notes from the December 12, 2017,
groundwater sampling event are presented in Appendix A.
The water supply well samples were collected in laboratory-supplied, preserved containers;
entered into chain of custody control; placed on ice; and shipped to North Carolina accredited
Con-Test Analytical Laboratory in East Longmeadow, Massachusetts. The water samples were
analyzed by EPA Method 6200B for VOCs including petroleum constituents. The analytical
report is included in Appendix B.
Current supply well analytical results are summarized in Table 2. Historical supply well
analytical results are shown in Table 3. Analytical results were compared to the 2L standards.
Supply well analytical results indicated a concentration of MTBE below 2L Standards in water
Federal/State-Lead Groundwater Monitoring Report May 11, 2018
Moore’s Exxon – NCDEQ Incident #6146 ATC Project #SLP0614601
7
supply well WSW-7414 (0.48 J µg/L). Concentrations of 2-butanone (MEK) and diisopropyl
ether (DIPE) were identified in water supply well WSW-7414 below 2L Standards at
concentrations of 3.7 J µg/L and 0.58 µg/L, respectively. No detectable concentrations of
petroleum compounds were identified in water supply wells WSW-26 or WSW-121.
As part of ATC’s quality assurance and quality control (QA and QC) measures, a data review of the
laboratory reports was conducted. During the review, it was found that the samples were received
from the laboratory in acceptable condition and properly preserved. The samples were analyzed
within correct holding times and reported within the lab report, and the chain of custody was
properly completed by all parties. The laboratory QC report shows that an internal blank was
analyzed for each method that was used for the original samples. The laboratory fortified blank
(LFB) and laboratory control sample (LCS) data results were also provided for each analytical
method. ATC also collected a field blank during the groundwater monitoring event, and no
constituents were detected in the blank. Refer to the laboratory reports in Appendix B for details
regarding QA results for the laboratory samples and any noted exceptions. Overall, ATC concludes
that the laboratory results are usable and any exceptions do not significantly impact the conclusions
presented in this report.
4.2 Groundwater Levels
On December 12, 2017, groundwater monitoring was conducted using the site monitoring well
network. Water levels were gauged in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-1R, MW-3R, MW-5, MW-
10R, MW-11, MW-12, and MW-13. Figure 3 depicts a site map and site characteristics. An
oil/water interface probe was used to measure the depth to groundwater from the top of well
casing (TOC). Groundwater elevation was then calculated based on TOC elevations, which are
referenced to an arbitrary elevation of 100.00 feet. Free product was not encountered in the
monitoring well network. Groundwater elevation data is summarized in Table 4. A groundwater
contour map depicting groundwater flow is presented in Figure 4. The contour map indicates
that groundwater flows to the east-northeast. Field notes from the December 12, 2017,
groundwater monitoring event are presented in Appendix A.
4.3 Groundwater Quality
On December 12, 2017, groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-
1R, MW-3R, MW-5, MW-10R, MW-11, MW-12, and MW-13. During sampling activities, if
sufficient water was available, a three-volume purge was implemented prior to groundwater sample
collection to ensure representative groundwater samples. The water samples were collected in
laboratory-supplied, preserved containers; entered into chain of custody control; placed on ice; and
shipped to North Carolina accredited Con-Test Analytical Laboratory in East Longmeadow,
Massachusetts. The groundwater samples were analyzed by EPA Method 6200B for VOCs
including petroleum constituents. The analytical report is included in Appendix B.
Groundwater field parameters including temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, pH, and
oxidation reduction potential were measured during the monitoring event. Field parameter readings
for each well are presented in Table 5. Current groundwater analytical results are summarized in
Table 6. Historical groundwater analytical results are shown in Table 7. The groundwater analytical
Federal/State-Lead Groundwater Monitoring Report May 11, 2018
Moore’s Exxon – NCDEQ Incident #6146 ATC Project #SLP0614601
8
results were compared to the 2L Standards and GCLs. Groundwater analytical results indicate the
following:
Free product was not observed in the monitoring well network;
Monitoring well MW-1 contained a concentration of benzene (8,900 µg/L) above the GCL
of 5,000 µg/L;
Monitoring well MW-1 also contained concentrations of diisopropyl ether (2,200 µg/L),
ethylbenzene (6,200 µg/L), isopropylbenzene (180 J µg/L), n-propylbenzene (410 J µg/L),
styrene (500 µg/L), toluene (120,000 µg/L), 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene (3,400 µg/L), 1,3,5-
trimethylbenzene (1,000 µg/L), and total xylenes (34,000 µg/L) above 2L Standards;
Monitoring well MW-1R contained detectable concentrations of three petroleum
constituents below 2L Standards;
Monitoring well MW-3R contained detectable concentrations of thirteen petroleum
constituents below 2L Standards;
Monitoring wells MW-5, MW-10R, MW-11, MW-12, and MW-13 did not contain
detectable concentrations of petroleum constituents; and
Based on the monitoring well network, groundwater appears to flow to the east-northeast.
Figure 5 depicts the compounds above 2L Standards.
The QA and QC measures and conditions applicable to the water supply well monitoring as
discussed in section 5.1, also apply to the monitoring well sampling.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
On behalf of the Trust Fund Branch of the UST Section, ATC has completed a GMR documenting
a December 12, 2017, monitoring event for the former Moore’s Exxon, located at 7390 NC
Highway 16, in Glendale Springs, Ashe County, North Carolina. Results from the groundwater
monitoring event indicate appreciable remaining benzene impact above the GCL in monitoring well
MW-1. Nine additional petroleum constituents were identified in monitoring well MW-1 at
concentrations above 2L Standards. Monitoring wells MW-5, MW-10R, MW-11, MW-12, and
MW-13 did not contain detectable concentrations of petroleum compounds. Concentrations detected
during the December 12, 2017, monitoring event are consistent previous findings. Continued
elevated petroleum concentrations found in groundwater collected from monitoring well MW-1
indicates the presence of a petroleum mass in the vadose zone in the area around monitoring well
MW-1 (former UST location).
Based on the information provided in this report, ATC recommends the following:
A GPR survey to investigate the possibility of additional tanks at the site;
Drilling and sampling of a soil boring in the former UST pit adjacent to monitoring well
MW-1 to assess the vertical extent of petroleum-impacted vadose-zone soil;
Based on the information of the soil assessment, ATC would then develop a strategy to
remediate this area.
TABLES
Well Parcel ID Well Owners / Well Users Property Address Owner Address
Distance and Direction
From Site
Well
Use
(P/I/N)
Municipal
Water
Connection
(Y/N)
WSW-3 12383-016-016
Glendale Springs Missionary
Baptist
231 J W Luke Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
Route 2 Box 498
West Jefferson, NC 28694 275 Feet/North P N
WSW-11 12342-090
Tina Lynn & Sharon Ann
Combs
141,193,225 Honeycomb Lane
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
286A J W Luke Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 440 Feet/ West P N
WSW-26 12383-016-009 David R. Sheets
107 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
950 Berne Street SE
Atlanta, GA 30316 200 Feet/ Southeast P N
WSW-120 12342-095
Glendale Springs Episcopal
Church
120 Glendale School Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
120 Glendale School Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 555 Feet/ North P N
WSW-121 12383-016-010 Larry & Amanda Smith
121 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 297
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 315 Feet/ Southeast P N
WSW-156 12342-242 Larry & Linda Taylor
156 Hamilton Lane
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
156 Hamilton Lane
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 925 Feet/ South P N
WSW-160 12342-333 Mary Ellen Lawrence Pesko
160 Hamilton Lane
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 82
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 990 Feet/ South P N
WSW-165 12342-093 Dolly Miller
165 Glendale School Road, Glendale
Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 23
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 595 Feet/ Northwest P N
WSW-171 12383-016-011 Wilson & Betty Higgins
171 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
171 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 460 Feet/ Southeast P N
WSW-193 12383-016-012 Thomas & Wilma Severt
193 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 33
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 570 Feet/ Southeast P N
WSW-195 12383-016-034
Holy Trinity Episcopal
Church
195 J.W. Luke Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
195 J.W. Luke Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 485 Feet/ North P N
WSW-197 12342-094 Robert Hamby
197 Glendale School Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 44
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 760 Feet/ Northwest P N
WSW-204 12383-016-004
Thomas Gray & Shirley
Craven
204 Trading Post Road, Glendale
Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 59
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 620 Feet/ Southeast P N
WSW-213 12383-016-013 Thomas & Wilma Severt
213 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 33
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 630 Feet/ East P N
WSW-216 12383-016-005 Thelma Stroud
216 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 75
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 830 Feet/ Southeast P N
WSW-230 12383-016-005 Thelma Stroud
230 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 75
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 885 Feet/ South P N
WSW-248 12383-016-032 Joan & Michael Bell
248 J.W. Luke Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 7
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 330 Feet/ Northwest P N
WSW-264 12383-016-006 Lifestore Bank
264 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 26
West Jefferson, NC 28694 925 Feet/ Southeast P N
WSW-285 12383-016-014 Timothy & Melanie Miller
285 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
169 Severts Lane
Jefferson, NC 28640 835 Feet/ Southeast P N
WSW-287 12383-016-014A Steve & Lorene Miller
287 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
287 Trading Post Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 950 Feet/ East P N
TABLE 1
WATER SUPPLY WELL INFORMATION
MOORE'S EXXON
7390 NC HIGHWAY 16
GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146
Well Parcel ID Well Owners / Well Users Property Address Owner Address
Distance and Direction
From Site
Well
Use
(P/I/N)
Municipal
Water
Connection
(Y/N)
TABLE 1
WATER SUPPLY WELL INFORMATION
MOORE'S EXXON
7390 NC HIGHWAY 16
GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146
WSW-350 12342-089
Glendale Springs
Presbyterian Church
350 J.W. Luke Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
350 J.W. Luke Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 445 Feet/ Southwest P N
WSW-460 12342-089
Glendale Springs
Presbyterian Church
460 J.W. Luke Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
460 J.W. Luke Road
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 930 Feet/ Southwest P N
WSW-7350 12383-016-030 Phoebe Fonville
7898 NC Highway 16
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
610 Little Rosewood Lane
Henderson, NC 27537 155 Feet/North P N
WSW-7385* 12383-016-036 Terry Sheets
7385 NC Highway 16
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
1145 Bare Creek Access
Road
Jefferson, NC 28640
200 Feet/ East P N
WSW-7414 12383-016-001 Lary & Amanda Smith
7414 NC Highway 16
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
P.O. Box 297
Glendale Springs, NC 28629 220 Feet/ South P N
WSW-7471 12383-016-003
Allen Bernard & Janet Miller
(US Post Office)
7471 NC Highway 16
Glendale Springs, NC 28629
3122 Old Wilkesboro Road
Jefferson, NC 28640 450 Feet/ South P N
Notes:
P / I / N = Potable water supply / Irrigation / Not in use
The locations of WSW-26 and WSW-7385 utilize the same water supply well.
Well ID Sample
Date BenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneTotal XylenesMethyl Tertiary Butyl EtherNaphthalene2-Butanone (MEK)Diisopropyl EtherWSW-3
WSW-26 12/12/2017 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <2.4 <0.18
WSW-121 12/12/2017 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <2.4 <0.18
WSW-7414 12/12/2017 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 0.48 J <0.12 3.7 J 0.58
1 600 600 500 20 6 4,000 70
5,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 20,000 6,000 4,000,000 70,000
Notes:
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (g/l) or parts per billion
GCL = Gross Contamination Level
J = Estimated value above or equal to Method Detection Limit and less than Quantification Limit.
2L Standard
GCL Standard
NOT SAMPLED - INOPERABLE
TABLE 2
CURRENT WATER SUPPLY WELL ANALYTICAL DATA
MOORE'S EXXON
7390 NC HIGHWAY 16
GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146
Well IDSampleDateBenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneTotal XylenesMethyl Tertiary Butyl EtherNaphthalene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetone2-Butanone (MEK)ChloromethaneDiisopropyl EtherIsopropylbenzenen-PropylbenzeneStyrene12/16/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 -- -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.507/25/2012 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 -- -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.501/9/2013 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS -- -- NS -- NS NS NS12/16/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 -- --7.8 --<0.50 <0.50 <0.503/20/2012 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 -- -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.507/25/2012 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 -- -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.501/9/2013 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <0.50 <2.0 <0.50 <0.50 -- -- <1.0 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.503/1/2016 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.38 <0.090 <0.12 <0.18 <0.13 <4.9 <2.4 <0.32 <0.18 <0.12 <0.13 <0.158/11/1999 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --7/25/2012 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 -- -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.501/9/2013 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <0.50 <2.0 <0.50 <0.50 -- -- <1.0 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Notes:Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (g/l) or parts per billion-- = Constituent not reportedValues BOLD print indicate levels above 2L Standards in place at the time of sampling* WSW- 26 was sampled on 7/8/15 as WSW-7385, which shares the same water supply well.GCL = Gross Contamination LevelJ = Estimated value above or equal to Method Detection Limit and less than Quantification Limit.B = Analyte was found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.HISTORICAL WATER SUPPLY WELL ANALYTICAL DATATABLE 3NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA7390 NC HIGHWAY 16MOORE'S EXXONWSW-2WSW-11WSW-3
Well IDSampleDateBenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneTotal XylenesMethyl Tertiary Butyl EtherNaphthalene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetone2-Butanone (MEK)ChloromethaneDiisopropyl EtherIsopropylbenzenen-PropylbenzeneStyreneHISTORICAL WATER SUPPLY WELL ANALYTICAL DATATABLE 3NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA7390 NC HIGHWAY 16MOORE'S EXXON8/11/1999 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --8/11/2000 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --12/8/2000 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --3/29/2001 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --7/18/2001 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --10/30/2001 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/13/2002 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --4/13/2010 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 NS -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.502/19/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 NS -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.5012/16/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 NS -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.503/20/2012 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 0.32 J <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 NS -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.507/25/2012 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 NS -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.501/9/2013 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <0.50 <2.0 <0.50 <0.50 NS -- <1.0 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.507/8/2014 <0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 0.37 J <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 <4.7 -- <0.32 -- <0.11 <0.094 <0.127/8/2015 <0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 0.32 J <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 6.6 B, J -- <0.32 <0.18 <0.11 <0.094 <0.123/1/2016 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.38 0.53 <0.12 <0.18 <0.13 <4.9 <2.4 <0.32 <0.18 <0.12 <0.13 <0.1512/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <0.18 <0.13 <9.7 <2.4 <0.55 <0.18 <0.12 <0.13 <0.157/8/2015 <0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 <0.090 <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 7.2 B, J -- <0.32 <0.18 <0.11 <0.094 <0.123/1/2016 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.38 <0.090 <0.12 <0.18 <0.13 <4.9 <2.4 <0.32 <0.18 <0.12 <0.13 <0.1512/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <0.18 <0.13 <9.7 <2.4 <0.55 <0.18 <0.12 <0.13 <0.15Notes:Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (g/l) or parts per billion-- = Constituent not reportedValues BOLD print indicate levels above 2L Standards in place at the time of sampling* WSW- 26 was sampled on 7/8/15 as WSW-7385, which shares the same water supply well.GCL = Gross Contamination LevelJ = Estimated value above or equal to Method Detection Limit and less than Quantification Limit.B = Analyte was found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.WSW-26*WSW-121
Well IDSampleDateBenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneTotal XylenesMethyl Tertiary Butyl EtherNaphthalene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetone2-Butanone (MEK)ChloromethaneDiisopropyl EtherIsopropylbenzenen-PropylbenzeneStyreneHISTORICAL WATER SUPPLY WELL ANALYTICAL DATATABLE 3NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA7390 NC HIGHWAY 16MOORE'S EXXONWSW-2487/8/2015<0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 <0.090 <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 7.0 B, J -- <0.32 <0.18 <0.11 <0.094 <0.12WSW-7350 7/25/2012 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 9.7 J -- <0.50 -- <0.50 <0.50 <0.507/8/2015 <0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 0.41 J <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 7.2 B, J -- <0.32 0.40 J <0.11 <0.094 <0.123/1/2016 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.38 0.55 <0.12 <0.18 <0.13 84 35 <0.32 <0.18 <0.12 <0.13 <0.1512/12/2017 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 0.48 J <0.12 <0.18 <0.13 <9.7 3.7 J <0.55 0.58 <0.12 <0.13 <0.157/8/2015 <0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 <0.090 <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 8.6 B, J -- <0.32 <0.18 <0.11 <0.094 <0.123/1/2016 <0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.38 <0.090 <0.12 <0.18 <0.13 <4.9 <2.4 <0.32 <0.18 <0.12 <0.13 <0.151 600 600 500 20 6 400 400 6,000 4,000 3 70 70 70 705,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 20,000 6,000 28,500 25,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 3,000 70,000 25,000 30,000 70,000Notes:Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (g/l) or parts per billion-- = Constituent not reportedValues BOLD print indicate levels above 2L Standards in place at the time of sampling* WSW- 26 was sampled on 7/8/15 as WSW-7385, which shares the same water supply well.GCL = Gross Contamination LevelJ = Estimated value above or equal to Method Detection Limit and less than Quantification Limit.B = Analyte was found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.WSW-74712L StandardGCL StandardWSW-7414
7/30/1997 20.38 21.71 1.33 79.26
2/10/1998 20.64 20.75 0.11 79.33
6/24/1999 22.30 22.45 0.15 77.66
11/19/1999 23.60 23.60 Sheen 76.40
8/1/2000 -- 23.92 -- 76.08
7/8/2014 22.79 22.90 0.11 77.18
11/7/2014 -- 23.58 -- 76.42
7/8/2015 -- 23.59 -- 76.41
3/1/2016 -- 19.31 -- 80.69
12/12/2017 -- 21.69 -- 78.31
2/19/2011 -- 25.39 -- 75.05
12/16/2011 -- 23.36 -- 77.08
1/9/2013 -- 24.68 -- 75.76
7/8/2014 -- 23.31 -- 77.13
7/8/2015 -- 24.17 -- 76.27
3/1/2016 -- 19.70 -- 80.74
12/12/2017 -- 22.15 -- 78.29
7/29/1997 -- 19.70 -- 79.37
2/10/1998 -- 19.43 -- 79.64
6/24/1999 -- 21.50 -- 77.57
11/19/1999 -- 23.25 -- 75.82
1/9/2013 -- 24.07 -- 75.00
7/29/1997 -- 20.05 -- 78.66
2/10/1998 -- 19.44 -- 79.27
6/24/1999 -- 21.80 -- 76.91
11/19/1999 -- 22.35 -- 76.36
2/19/2011 -- 23.13 -- 75.27
12/16/2011 -- 21.40 -- 77.00
1/9/2013 -- 22.70 -- 75.70
7/8/2014 -- 21.70 -- 76.70
11/7/2014 -- 22.31 -- 76.09
7/8/2015 -- 22.37 -- 76.03
3/1/2016 -- 18.54 -- 79.86
12/12/2017 -- 20.62 -- 77.78
7/29/1997 -- 22.27 -- 79.14
2/10/1998 -- 21.84 -- 79.57
6/24/1999 -- Dry -- --
11/19/1999 -- Dry -- --
7/29/1997 -- 20.09 -- 77.92
2/19/2011 -- 21.95 -- 76.06
12/16/2011 -- 19.49 -- 78.521/9/2013 -- 21.37 --76.64
7/8/2014 -- 20.55 -- 77.46
7/8/2015 -- 21.13 -- 76.88
3/1/2016 -- 17.12 -- 80.89
12/12/2017 -- 19.54 -- 78.47
7/29/1997 -- 11.45 -- 78.01
2/10/1998 -- 9.13 -- 80.33
6/24/1999 -- 13.02 -- 76.44
11/18/1999 -- 13.20 -- 76.26
Notes:
TOC = Top of Casing.
Groundwater
Elevation Well ID TOC Elevation
Depth to
Groundwater
29 98.71
MW-4
MW-6
25
24
TOC Elevations based on arbitrary onsite benchmark of 100 feet and collected from historical reports.
All measurements expressed in feet
MW-2
MW-3
89.46
MW-3R
MW-5
Product
ThicknessTotall Well DepthGauging Date Depth to Product
23.5
98.4029
19
98.01
MW-1
MW-1R 100.4430
100.0025
101.41
TABLE 4
NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146
GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
7390 NC HIGHWAY 16
MOORE'S EXXON
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
99.07
Groundwater
Elevation Well ID TOC Elevation
Depth to
Groundwater
Product
ThicknessTotall Well DepthGauging Date Depth to Product
TABLE 4
NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146
GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
7390 NC HIGHWAY 16
MOORE'S EXXON
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA
7/29/1997 -- 14.73 -- 82.19
2/10/1998 -- 13.20 -- 83.72
7/29/1997 -- 20.52 -- 78.58
2/10/1998 -- 19.91 -- 79.19
6/24/1999 -- 23.32 -- 75.78
7/29/1997 -- 5.12 -- 76.30
2/10/1998 -- 4.10 -- 77.32
6/24/1999 -- 5.64 -- 75.78
11/18/1999 -- 6.40 -- 75.02
2/19/2011 -- 8.11 -- 73.99
12/16/2011 -- 6.68 -- 75.42
1/9/2013 -- 7.70 -- 74.40
7/8/2014 -- 7.41 -- 74.69
7/8/2015 -- 7.62 -- 74.48
3/1/2016 -- 5.29 -- 76.81
12/12/2017 -- 6.60 -- 75.50
8/11/2000 -- 28.24 -- 76.19
2/19/2011 -- 28.82 -- 75.61
12/16/2011 -- 26.76 -- 77.67
1/9/2013 -- NA -- NA
7/8/2014 -- 27.44 -- 76.99
7/8/2015 -- 27.40 -- 77.03
3/1/2016 -- 22.24 -- 82.19
12/12/2017 -- 25.02 -- 79.41
8/11/2000 -- 24.07 -- 76.66
2/19/2011 -- 25.02 -- 75.71
12/16/2011 -- 22.69 -- 78.04
1/9/2013 -- 24.40 -- 76.33
7/8/2014 -- 22.98 -- 77.75
7/8/2015 -- 23.82 -- 76.91
3/1/2016 -- 19.08 -- 81.65
12/12/2017 -- 21.71 -- 79.02
7/8/2014 -- 22.98 -- 77.16
7/8/2015 -- 22.68 -- 77.46
3/1/2016 -- 18.12 -- 82.02
12/12/2017 -- 20.74 -- 79.40
Notes:
TOC = Top of Casing.
All measurements expressed in feet
TOC Elevations based on arbitrary onsite benchmark of 100 feet and collected from historical reports.
MW-10 81.42
MW-9
19 96.92
99.10
100.1430
14.5
60.5
MW-13
100.7330MW-12
MW-10R 14 82.10
104.4330MW-11
MW-8
Well Date
Temperature
(◦C)
Conductivity
(µS/cm)pH ORP DO (mg/L)
MW-1 12/12/2017 -- -- -- -- --
MW-1R 12/12/2017 11.42 0.610 5.27 152 0.00
MW-3R 12/12/2017 11.95 5.39 5.21 193 0.00
MW-5 12/12/2017 12.61 0.129 4.15 294 0.00
MW-10R 12/12/2017 12.06 0.156 7.01 206 0.00
MW-11 12/12/2017 8.03 0.087 5.20 248 0.00
MW-12 12/12/2017 11.81 0.245 5.41 242 0.00
MW-13 12/12/2017 12.02 1.22 4.91 280 2.55
TABLE 5
NATURAL ATTENUATION PARAMETERS
MOORE'S EXXON
7390 NC HIGHWAY 16
GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146
Well IDSampleDateBenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneTotal XylenesMethyl Tertiary Butyl EtherNaphthalenen-Butylbenzenesec-Butylbenzenetert-ButylbenzeneDiisopropyl etherIsopropylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenen-PropylbenzeneStyrene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneMW-112/12/20178,900120,000 6,200 34,000<90 <120 <150 <130 <1202,200 180 J<150410 J 500 3,400 1,000MW-1R12/12/2017<0.12 0.22 J <0.13 <0.39 0.35 J <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 0.20 J <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13MW-3R12/12/20170.41 J 0.23 J 1.3 1.75 <0.090 3.2 1.7 1.0 0.15 J <0.18 0.97 0.89 3.6 <0.15 14 2.1MW-512/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13MW-10R12/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13MW-1112/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13MW-1212/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13MW-1312/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13FB12/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <0.15 <0.18 <0.131 600 600 500 20 6 70 70 70 70 70 25 70 70 400 4005,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 20,000 6,000 6,900 8,500 15,000 70,000 25,000 11,700 30,000 70,000 28,500 25,000Notes:Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (g/l) or parts per billionValues highlighted and in bold print indicate levels above 2L StandardsUnderlined values indicate that the detection limit is above 2L Standards."<" or ND = Not Detected above laboratory detection limits.GCL = Gross Contamination LevelNE = Not EstablishedJ = Estimated value above or equal to Method Detection Limit and less than Quantification Limit.B = Analyte was found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.7390 NC HIGHWAY 16MOORE'S EXXONSUMMARY OF CURRENT ANALYTICAL DATATABLE 62L StandardGCL StandardNCDEQ INCIDENT #6146GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Well IDSampleDateBenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneTotal XylenesMethyl Tertiary Butyl EtherNaphthaleneAcetonen-Butylbenzenesec-Butylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene4-ChlorotolueneDiisopropyl etherIsopropylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenen-PropylbenzeneMethyl Isobutyl KetoneStyrene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C12 AliphaticsC9-C10 Aliphatics2/10/1998 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS -- -- -- -- NS NS -- NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS12/16/20117,300111,000 7,100 42,000 2,200 710 JNS -- -- -- --9,500<34 --590<48660 4,300 1,200NS NS NS7/25/2012 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS -- -- -- -- NS NS -- NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS1/9/2013 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS -- -- -- -- NS NS -- NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS7/8/2014NS NS NS NS NS NS NS -- -- -- -- NS NS -- NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS7/8/20158,400110,000 6,700 38,000 280 J 2,100 6,500 B,J<54 <84 <96 390 J5,000 210 J<120470 J<1,500250 J 4,500 1,100NS NS NS3/1/20166,000100,000 5,900 36,000<45700<2,400100 J<65 <55 <701,400 160 J<75420<730<754,900 1,100NS NS NS12/12/20178,900120,000 6,200 34,000<90 <120 <9,700 <150 <130 <120 <1402,200 180 J<150410 J<1,500500 3,400 1,000NS NS NS2/19/20115.650 4.5 52360<1.0 NS -- -- -- --210<0.50 -- <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 12 4840220 10012/16/20115.524 7.6 784401.5 NS -- -- -- --220<0.50 -- 0.67 0.64 J <0.50 11 5.9 NS NS NS7/25/20123.416 4.7 503401 2.9 J -- -- -- --100<0.50 -- 0.51 0.61 J <0.50 12 4.2 NS NS NS1/9/201311.546.5 23.4 191.51895.3 NS -- -- -- --1131.1 -- 2.3 NS <0.50 53.8 11.7 NS NS NS7/8/20140.32 J 3.1 1.1 7.8 11 0.3 J <4.7 -- -- -- -- 5 <0.11 -- 0.13 J NA <1.2 3.3 0.54 NS NS NS7/8/20150.98 2.2 2.0 12.7 20 1.6 13 B, J <0.054 <0.084 <0.096 <0.074 8.8 0.12 J <0.12 0.18 J <1.5 <0.12 5.2 0.69 NS NS NS3/1/2016<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.38 <0.090 <0.12 <4.9 <0.15 <0.13 <0.11 <0.14 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS12/12/2017<0.12 0.22 J <0.13 <0.39 0.35 J <0.12 <9.7 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.14 0.20 J <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS3/6/199733.78 ND 73.7 ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/10/19989.22.2 ND 21.7 7.3 ND -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --11/19/199926.338.2 ND 16.3 6.5 ND -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --7/25/201210,000200,000 8,300120,0001,400 510160 J -- -- -- --9,000 230 -- 51083 J420 4,200 1,200NS NS NS1/9/20137,85086,400 6,190 34,100 1,830 597NS -- -- -- --10,700 184 -- 480NS <103,850 1,120NS NS NS7/8/2014NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS3/6/19972,766 26,310 1,344 8,214 15,002-- -- -- -- -- --8,324-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/10/1998877 1,0564561,396 1,324 233-- -- -- -- --1,392-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --6/23/19993,906 10,524 1,723 9,131 25,013 118-- -- -- -- --11,475-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 287800 34070 5275011/18/19992,506 10,900 1,235 6,940 18,517 84.8 -- -- -- -- -- 7,613 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --1 600 600 500 20 6 6,000 70 70 70 NE 70 70 25 70 100 70 400 400 420 4,200 2105,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 20,000 6,000 6,000,000 6,900 8,500 15,000 NE 70,000 25,000 11,700 30,000 100,000 70,000 28,500 25,000 NE NE NENotes:Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (g/l) or parts per billionValues highlighted and in bold print indicate levels above 2L StandardsUnderlined values indicate that the detection limit is above 2L Standards.ND = Not DetectedGCL = Gross Contamination LevelNE = Not EstablishedJ = Estimated value above or equal to Method Detection Limit and less than Quantification LimitB = Analyte was found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.MW-1RMW-1GCL StandardMW-2MW-32L StandardHISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATATABLE 7NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA7390 NC HIGHWAY 16MOORE'S EXXON
Well IDSampleDateBenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneTotal XylenesMethyl Tertiary Butyl EtherNaphthaleneAcetonen-Butylbenzenesec-Butylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene4-ChlorotolueneDiisopropyl etherIsopropylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenen-PropylbenzeneMethyl Isobutyl KetoneStyrene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C12 AliphaticsC9-C10 AliphaticsHISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATATABLE 7NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA7390 NC HIGHWAY 16MOORE'S EXXON2/19/2011520 7,900 1,800 10,700 180 610NS -- -- -- --280 120 -- 280<1.0 <0.502,700 680 440480 21012/16/2014 <5.4 330 3602,600<5.6150NS -- -- -- -- <4.2 <3.4 --120<4.8 <3.41,300350 NS NS NS7/25/201278590 5203,800<5036079 J--------<25110 -- 300<1.0 <252,900 850NS NS NS1/9/201391.1573 3792,2677.6450NS -- -- -- -- 31.582.9 -- 235NS <5.02,300 664NS NS NS7/8/20145182 120 141 1.7 J150<47 -- -- -- -- 14 34 --100NA <1.2 370 66 NS NS NS7/8/2015254.6 110 55.3 <0.090160<4.7 24 12 2.0 <0.074 3.8 51 12160<1.5 <0.1249098 NS NS NS3/1/20160.55 0.28 J 1.1 0.61 <0.090 0.88 <4.9 2.8 1.5 0.18 J <0.14 <0.18 0.74 1.0 3.4 <1.5 <0.15 5.5 1.2 NS NS NS12/12/20170.41 J 0.23 J 1.3 1.75 <0.090 3.2 <9.7 1.7 1.0 0.15 J <0.14 <0.18 0.97 0.89 3.6 <1.5 <0.15 14 2.1 NS NS NS3/6/1997 ND ND ND ND ND-- -- -- -- -- --ND-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/10/1998 ND ND ND ND ND ND-- -- -- -- --ND-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --7/3/1997 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/10/1998 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --6/23/1999 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --11/18/1999 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/19/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 0.93 <0.50 <50 26 J <5012/16/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS7/25/2012<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS1/9/2013<0.50 <0.50 <0.05 <1.5 <0.50 <2.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 NS <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS7/8/2014<0.079 0.34 J <0.092 <0.29 <0.090 <0.12 <4.7 -- -- -- -- <0.18 <0.11 -- <0.94 NA <1.2 0.23 J 0.51 NS NS NS7/8/2015<0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 <0.090 <0.12 5.5 B, J <0.054 <0.084 <0.096 <0.074 <0.18 <0.11 <0.12 <0.094 <1.5 <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 NS NS NS3/1/2016<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.38 <0.090 <0.12 <4.9 <0.15 <0.13 <0.11 <0.14 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS12/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <9.7 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.14 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS4/3/199739.8360 144548ND -- -- -- -- -- -- 5.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/10/199810.6172 27.2 285 ND 3.2 -- -- -- -- -- 1.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --6/23/1999106240 73555811-- -- -- -- -- 61 -- -- -- -- -- -- --13,220 14,880 18,17011/18/19999.542 4.2 271 ND7.6 -- -- -- -- --ND-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --1 600 600 500 20 6 6,000 70 70 70 NE 70 70 25 70 100 70 400 400 420 4,200 2105,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 20,000 6,000 6,000,000 6,900 8,500 15,000 NE 70,000 25,000 11,700 30,000 100,000 70,000 28,500 25,000 NE NE NENotes:Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (g/l) or parts per billionValues highlighted and in bold print indicate levels above 2L StandardsUnderlined values indicate that the detection limit is above 2L Standards."<" or ND = Not Detected above laboratory detection limits.GCL = Gross Contamination LevelNE = Not EstablishedJ = Estimated value above or equal to Method Detection Limit and less than Quantification LimitB = Analyte was found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.MW-5MW-6GCL StandardMW-3RMW-42L Standard
Well IDSampleDateBenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneTotal XylenesMethyl Tertiary Butyl EtherNaphthaleneAcetonen-Butylbenzenesec-Butylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene4-ChlorotolueneDiisopropyl etherIsopropylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenen-PropylbenzeneMethyl Isobutyl KetoneStyrene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C12 AliphaticsC9-C10 AliphaticsHISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATATABLE 7NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA7390 NC HIGHWAY 16MOORE'S EXXON4/3/1997ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/10/1998ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --6/23/1999ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --11/18/1999 ND ND ND ND ND ND-- -- -- -- --ND-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --4/3/1997 ND ND ND ND ND-- -- -- -- -- --ND-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/10/1998 ND ND ND ND ND ND-- -- -- -- --ND-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MW-9 6/16/1997 ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --7/24/1997ND 2.3 ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/10/1998ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --6/23/1999ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --11/18/1999 ND ND ND ND ND ND-- -- -- -- --ND-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --2/19/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 0.90 J <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <50 <50 <5012/16/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS7/25/2012<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS1/9/2013<0.50 <0.50 <0.05 <1.5 <0.50 <2.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 NS <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS7/8/2014<0.079 0.13 J <0.092 <0.29 <0.090 <0.12 <4.7 <0.18 <0.11 -- <0.94 NA <1.2 <0.18 <0.10 NS NS NS7/8/2015<0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 <0.090 <0.12 8.9 B, J <0.054 <0.084 <0.096 <0.074 <0.18 <0.11 <0.12 <0.094 <1.5 <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 NS NS NS3/1/2016<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.38 <0.090 <0.12 <4.9 <0.15 <0.13 <0.11 <0.14 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS12/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <9.7 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.14 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS1 600 600 500 20 6 6,000 70 70 70 NE 70 70 25 70 100 70 400 400 420 4,200 2105,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 20,000 6,000 6,000,000 6,900 8,500 15,000 NE 70,000 25,000 11,700 30,000 100,000 70,000 28,500 25,000 NE NE NENotes:Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (g/l) or parts per billionValues highlighted and in bold print indicate levels above 2L StandardsUnderlined values indicate that the detection limit is above 2L Standards."<" or ND = Not Detected above laboratory detection limits.GCL = Gross Contamination LevelNE = Not EstablishedJ = Estimated value above or equal to Method Detection Limit and less than Quantification LimitB = Analyte was found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.2L StandardMW-10GCL StandardMW-7MW-8MW-10R
Well IDSampleDateBenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneTotal XylenesMethyl Tertiary Butyl EtherNaphthaleneAcetonen-Butylbenzenesec-Butylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene4-ChlorotolueneDiisopropyl etherIsopropylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenen-PropylbenzeneMethyl Isobutyl KetoneStyrene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C12 AliphaticsC9-C10 AliphaticsHISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATATABLE 7NCDEQ INCIDENT #6146GLENDALE SPRINGS, ASHE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA7390 NC HIGHWAY 16MOORE'S EXXON8/11/2000 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ND ND ND4/13/2010 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <0.50 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 N/A <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 ND ND ND2/19/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 1.18 J <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 N/A <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <50 <50 <5012/16/2011<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 N/A <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS7/25/2012<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 N/A <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS1/9/2013<0.50 0.94 <0.50 <1.5 <0.50 <2.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 N/A <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS7/8/2014<0.079 0.55 <0.092 0.73 J <0.090 <0.12 <4.7 <0.18 <0.11 -- <0.94 NA <1.2 0.31 J <0.10 NS NS NS7/8/2015<0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 <0.090 <0.12 5.9 B, J <0.054 <0.084 <0.096 <0.074 <0.18 <0.11 <0.12 <0.094 <1.5 <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 NS NS NS3/1/2016<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.38 <0.090 <0.12 <4.9 <0.15 <0.13 <0.11 <0.14 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS12/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <9.7 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.14 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS8/11/2000 ND ND ND ND ND ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ND ND ND4/13/2010 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <0.50 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 N/A <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 ND ND ND2/19/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 1.14 J <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 N/A <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <50 <50 <5012/16/2011<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 N/A <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS7/25/2012<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <1.0 <1.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 N/A <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS1/9/2013<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 <0.50 <2.0 -- -- -- -- -- <0.50 <0.50 -- <0.50 N/A <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NS NS NS7/8/2014<0.079 0.63 0.13 J 0.89 J <0.090 <0.12 <4.7 <0.18 <0.11 -- <0.94 NA <1.2 0.33 J <0.10 NS NS NS7/8/2015<0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 <0.090 <0.12 6.0 B, J <0.054 <0.084 <0.096 <0.074 <0.18 <0.11 <0.12 <0.094 <1.5 <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 NS NS NS3/1/2016<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.38 <0.090 <0.12 <4.9 <0.15 <0.13 <0.11 <0.14 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS12/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <9.7 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.14 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS12/2/2014 <0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 ND -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ND ND ND7/8/2015<0.079 <0.090 <0.092 <0.29 <0.090 <0.12 8.7 B, J <0.054 <0.084 <0.096 <0.074 <0.18 <0.11 <0.12 <0.094 <1.5 <0.12 <0.18 <0.10 NS NS NS3/1/2016<0.24 <0.34 <0.26 <0.76 <0.18 <0.24 <9.7 <0.30 <0.26 <0.22 <0.28 <0.36 <0.24 <0.30 <0.26 <2.9 <0.30 <0.36 <0.26 NS NS NS12/12/2017<0.12 <0.17 <0.13 <0.39 <0.090 <0.12 <9.7 <0.15 <0.13 <0.12 <0.14 <0.18 <0.12 <0.15 <0.13 <1.5 <0.15 <0.18 <0.13 NS NS NS1 600 600 500 20 6 6,000 70 70 70 NE 70 70 25 70 100 70 400 400 420 4,200 2105,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 20,000 6,000 6,000,000 6,900 8,500 15,000 NE 70,000 25,000 11,700 30,000 100,000 70,000 28,500 25,000 NE NE NENotes:Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (g/l) or parts per billionValues highlighted and in bold print indicate levels above 2L StandardsUnderlined values indicate that the detection limit is above 2L Standards."<" or ND = Not Detected above laboratory detection limits.GCL = Gross Contamination LevelNE = Not EstablishedJ = Estimated value above or equal to Method Detection Limit and less than Quantification LimitB = Analyte was found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.MW-13MW-12GCL Standard2L StandardMW-11
FIGURES
SITE
CAD FILE PREP. BY REV. BY SCALE PROJECT NO.
TITLE
DATE
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5-MINUTE MAP, GLENDALE SPRINGS, NORTH
CAROLINA. DATED 2016
LATITUDE: 1257+
LONGITUDE::(67
1,000'500'
Tra
d
i
n
g
P
o
s
t
R
o
a
dNC Highway 16Glendale S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
J W Luke RoadHoney Comb Lane
WSW-120
WSW-165WSW-197
WSW-248
WSW-7350WSW-3
WSW-275
WSW-7414 WSW-26*
WSW-121
WSW-213
WSW-171
WSW-7471
WSW-285
WSW-287
WSW-350
WSW-460 WSW-204
WSW-216
WSW-156
WSW-264
WSW-7385*
WSW-11
WSW-160
WSW-193
WSW-195
WSW-230
WSW-285
CAD FILE PREP. BY REV. BY SCALE PROJECT NO.
TITLE
DATE
Source: NC Geospatial Database
NOTE:
* =WSW-26 and WSW-7385 utilize
the same water supply well.
EXPLANATION
WATER SUPPLY WELL LOCATION
Trad
ing
Po
s
t
RoadNC Highway 16Glendale
Fire
Department
Former
Moore's
Exxon
MW-1 MW-2
MW-9
MW-3R
MW-3R
MW-7
MW-6
MW-5
MW-1R
MW-11
MW-4
MW-12
MW-10
MW-10R
MW-13
NC Highway 16J W Luke RoadCommercial
Building
Residence
Residence
Residence
Glendale Springs Inn
& Restaurant
CAD FILE PREP. BY REV. BY SCALE PROJECT NO.
TITLE
DATE
SITE
Source: NC Geospatial Database
EXPLANATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
DESTROYED MONITORING WELL LOCATION
SITE
Trad
ing
Pos
t
RoadNC Highway 16Glendale
Fire
Department
Former
Moore's
Exxon
MW-1 MW-2
MW-9
MW-3R
MW-3R
MW-7
MW-6
MW-5
MW-1R
MW-11
MW-4
MW-12
MW-10
MW-10R
MW-13
NC Highway 16J W Luke RoadCommercial
Building
Residence
Residence
Residence
Glendale Springs Inn
& Restaurant
78.31
78.29
77.78
78.47
75.50
79.41
79.02
79.40
7
9
.
0
0
7
8
.
0
0
7
7
.
0
0
7
6
.
0
0
EXPLANATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
DESTROYED MONITORING
WELL LOCATION
77 GROUNDWATER
CONTOUR LINE
GROUNDWATER
FLOW DIRECTION
CAD FILE PREP. BY REV. BY SCALE PROJECT NO.
TITLE
DATE
SITE
Source: NC Geospatial Database
NOTE:
1.Groundwater elevations measured on December 12, 2017.
2.Dashed lines indicate areas of less certainty.
Trad
ing
Pos
t
RoadNC Highway 16Glendale
Fire
Department
Former
Moore's
Exxon
MW-1 MW-2
MW-9
MW-3R
MW-3R
MW-7
MW-6
MW-5
MW-1R
MW-11
MW-4
MW-12
MW-10
MW-10R
MW-13
NC Highway 16J W Luke RoadCommercial
Building
Residence
Residence
Residence
Glendale Springs Inn
& Restaurant
CAD FILE PREP. BY REV. BY SCALE PROJECT NO.
TITLE
DATE
Source: NC Geospatial Database
EXPLANATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
DESTROYED MONITORING WELL LOCATION
NOTE:
1.Concentrations shown exceed 2L Standards.
2.Concentration in BOLD and ITALICS indicates
concentration exceeds GCLs.
3.Groundwater samples collected on December 12, 2017.
APPENDIX A
FIELD NOTES
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Page 1 of 48
Page 2 of 48
Page 3 of 48
Page 4 of 48
Page 5 of 48
Page 6 of 48
Page 7 of 48
Page 8 of 48
Page 9 of 48
Page 10 of 48
Page 11 of 48
Page 12 of 48
Page 13 of 48
Page 14 of 48
Page 15 of 48
Page 16 of 48
Page 17 of 48
Page 18 of 48
Page 19 of 48
Page 20 of 48
Page 21 of 48
Page 22 of 48
Page 23 of 48
Page 24 of 48
Page 25 of 48
Page 26 of 48
Page 27 of 48
Page 28 of 48
Page 29 of 48
Page 30 of 48
Page 31 of 48
Page 32 of 48
Page 33 of 48
Page 34 of 48
Page 35 of 48
Page 36 of 48
Page 37 of 48
Page 38 of 48
Page 39 of 48
Page 40 of 48
Page 41 of 48
Page 42 of 48
Page 43 of 48
Page 44 of 48
Page 45 of 48
Page 46 of 48
Page 47 of 48
Page 48 of 48