Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDuke_MarshallSteamStation_SWMP1998NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT March 16, 1999 Mr. Allen Stowe Duke Power Group Environmental, Health & Safety 13339 Hagers Ferry Rd. Huntersville, North Carolina 28078-7929 SUBJECT: Marshall Steam Station Solid Waste Management 10-Year Plan Catawba County, Facility Dear Mr. Stowe: The Section has completed the compliance review of Marshall Steam Station's comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. It appears that the plan has addressed all the requirements of GS 130 A-309.09A(b). We encourage Duke Power to implement the programs as stated in the plan and to continually review the effectiveness of the plan in meeting your goals and the goals of the State law. The facility should modify the plan as necessary and as conditions change that impact solid waste management. I would like to remind you that General Statute 1.30A-309.09A(b) requires that each plan shall be updated at least every three years." The update would need to be completed no later than July l,, 2000. If conditions change at your facility sufficiently to warrant a substantial update of the plan, it can be done earlier than three years. If b you significantly update the plan before that time, your next update will be three years m from the time that your update is completed. I will gladly assist you in evaluating the most optimal time to update your plan based on changes in the priorities and infrastructure of Marshall Steam Station. Thank you and all those at Duke Power who participated in the development and implementation of the plan. If you have any questions concerning this letter or future planning requirements, please do not hesitate to contact me at (704)663-1699, extension 215. t r 91 9�NORTH J%1RE , MOOR S+ UILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 281 15 PHONE 741 63-1699 FAX 704-663-6040 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTIONEMPLOYER-50% RL4% EO/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER 6+ Page Two Sincerely, Anthony B. Fos er tom~ l ova_ Waste Management Specialists Solid Waste Section cc: Mr. Julian Foscue, Winston-Salem Regional Office Mr. Phil Prete, Raleigh ABF/de PDuke dar'Power. A Duk, Energy C—pn y April 20, 1998 Anthony Foster (W.M.S) Solid Waste Management 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Subject: Marshall Steam Station Landfill (18-04) Waste Reduction Plan Record: 004991-DP Dear Mr. Foster: Duke Power Group Environment, Health er Safety 13339 Hagers Ferry Road Huntersville, NC 28078-7929 Attached is the Landfill Waste Reduction Plan for the Marshall Steam Station Landfill (18-04) as mandated by GS130A-309.09D(c). If you have any questions, please contact me at (704) 875-4655. Allen Stowe, Scientist Environmental Protection - Waste Management jas/msswrp Attachments cc: Mark Hollis Donna Burrell Mike Ruhe Neale Taylor c Industrial Waste Landfill Waste Reduction flan In accordance with North Carolina GS130A-309.09D Name: Marshall Steam Station Permit #: 18-04 Permit expiration date: The permit was issued on 12-30-83 and does not contain an expiration date. Unit of measure for waste: Ton Projected annual tonnage for the next ten years (volume of ash to be disposed of in the landfill) 1 1998 - tons - 100 2 1999 - tons - 100 3 2000 - tons - 100 4 2001 - tons - 100 5 2002 - tons - 100 6 2003 - tons - 100 7 2004 - tons - 100 8 2005 - tons - 100 9 2006 - tons - 100 10 2007 - tons - 100 Expected years of disposal capacity at the current disposal rate: The Marshall landfill (Permit # 18-04) will reach its designed capacity in the year 2001, about 3 years from now. The final landfill configuration is shown on drawing M-l0A and is included in the report dated April 23, 1996. Since that time we have negotiated with our ash management contia' ctor to achieve better utilization of our ash. Based on these negotiations, the disposal of ash in the landfill will be reduced significantly. If the projected use of ash is achieved and maintained the life of the landfill could be indefinite. Description of waste types disposed of- Coal Ash Waste reduction options: Several factors impact fly ash production, utilization, and disposal, including: future competition, coal quality, fly ash quality, equipment performance, and future environmental regulations. The projected fly ash production, utilization, and disposal rates are listed in on the attached chart. 1 Management methods that will be used and implementation schedule for waste reduction: Utilization combines various uses for ash such as: beneficial fill, incorporation into concrete and concrete blocks, cover material and soil amendments. The industrial facility's proposal for a waste reduction tracking method that incorporates production rate within its operation: Ash utilization is tracked extensively as illustrated in attached chart. Fly ash utilization goals are established each year. These goals are normally exceeded. Description of how the facility will comply with the requirement that all active sanitary landfills beequipped with liners leachate collection systems and final cover system by 1998: 1 In response to rule 15A NCAC 13B .0503 SITING AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPOSAL SITES (2) (d) (i)(ii), Duke Power submitted the requested information to your department on April 23, 1996. In letters dated 9/26/96 and 10/1/96 drawings were requested to indicate the facilities future development. The requested information was submitted to the Section on December 1, 1997. Acknowledgment from the Section will constitute compliance with Rule. 503(2)(d)(ii). 7 co OD eh n j N lt;f Cl) r •� U C p CD CD p r' O (D (D O co O N N � O cz (D �C ® += t�' E � (fl NLO m N cow® "t CO r Cfj : d CL O +� a) O ®. L O U � 0- LO T (D ® M CV) ® ® O N LO O coODC) ep• CO r e•: C (D C C N N ® Cw _ ca 0) E ® co O Nn N pN N co An C O q) �C w o o a) a3 a eA co p ®Q Di Q1O CL Cr® (\d "t Cl) ® C -0 Q •U d x Co CD 2 O a co co C\j w a) O U- U Off. cyC N N It Cl) r CU U �p y a) co a7 cz o I =0 o Opp C> rrO ® vi en c -� r CD d �3 ® N In Ln 0 et Cl)r ® C O N O — CL C ® w to co C = (n C1 a) 0 0 ®. cr C p *° � O CO (D M V CDp� LO t.. O N N p O 'D C U co N ti d p N CO °' =. N C® ® U a? 0 E cu C C.)� C? C O C 0)O p ®> .a C ccu ® N N tvNL O p M M O Md2O ¢: U N crj O co CL r It vt M CV r = = ,.0 N ® � CD Q Ole W+ C M ® � ® C � •O ;.lily�y.. C.. V/ O VJ M M CO C)•(.i ai , M u% �M® . ® q o C1 W U r- L C. C ®• .� tTJ CTJ `0 i- ® c? cn Co IL ` O ®� C E cti (� C o >, � � N tU � 7 N (Z — v� J y- O- Jo O (D (O� C D a. O a_ cys a) CL .0 cW L nQ E o® . c oao ti ® n cn a)o to �' fJJ Q Q ' CV LL U- vi m 0