WS-6081_22332_CA_O_20210210_STLPackage

RECOMMENDATION OF SITE FOR STATE LEAD CLEANUP
Incident Name: ____Texaco Food Mart #2______________ Site Priority Risk/Rank ___H157D_______
Incident #: _22332 _ County: _______Davidson______________ City: __Lexington_______________
Site Address: _1700 Cotton Grove Rd. _________________________________________________
Current Landowner 2418 North Main LLC Address_____15 Laura Lane, Thomasville, NC 27360_ ___
Recommended by: ____D. Whitmire______Regional Office: _____W-S____________
Date of Last Site Visit ___7/10/2020____________
Step 1: Private/public water supply well within 1000’ X yes θ no Has a water supply been contaminated? θ yes X no Has alternate water been provided? θ yes X no
Step 2: This incident is recommended for State Lead Cleanup because (check All that apply)
θ The RO has not been able to positively identify the source(s) of contamination
θ The RO has not been able to positively identify the RP
θ The RO has positively identified the source(s) but RP cannot be located, or is deceased
θ The RP has been identified but refuses to comply with investigative requirements X The RP has been identified but claims financial hardship or bankruptcy, dissolved
θ The RO is continuing its investigation of sources and RPs, but immediate action is necessary to protect human health and the environment. See comments.
Step 3: Attach a statement documenting or supporting the site risk determination (RRA Form) based upon a confirmed UST release of petroleum to soil and/or groundwater.
Step 4: Attach a cover memo with a complete summary of site history and chronology of events, including RO actions taken to date.
Step 5: Attach the entire original Regional Office file, and be sure it includes: X 24-Hour Release and UST Leak Reporting Form (Form 61) and ranking formsX Topographic map with site location clearly identified X NORRs, NOVs, and any other correspondence issued and received X Alternate water requests and any information on available water sources X Telephone logs, any supplemental information
Step 6: Check all that apply for any UST located at the site:
θ UST is a heating oil tank 1100 gallons or less θ UST is a heating oil tank greater than 1100 gallons for four or fewer households
θ UST is farm or residential, 1100 gallons or less of motor fuel for non-commercial purposes
θ The UST is a non-regulated, commercial UST X The UST is a regulated UST
Comments: ________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________ _____________________________ Regional Supervisor Signature Date
Attachment: Incident File
(revision 5/1/06)
02/10/2021Carin Lee Kromm
Memo
TO: Scott Bullock, Corrective Action Branch State Trust Fund Branch
FROM: Doug Whitmire, Winston-Salem Regional Office Hydrogeologist Through Carin Lee Kromm, Winston-Salem Office Regional Supervisor
DATE: July 24, 2020
RE: Incident No.: 22332, Former Texaco Food Mart #2, 1700 Cotton Grove Road, Lexington, Davidson County, Incident #22332, Risk/Rank/Land Use Classification: High/157/Industrial/Commercial, Request for State Lead This site is being submitted to the State Lead Program because the person who appears to be the responsible party, Holding Bros., Inc., was dissolved on July 18, 2003. However, based on available information, it is not possible to determine if the contamination is only from a release discovered during Holding Bros., Inc. ownership or if there was a second release during United Oil of the Carolinas, Inc.'s ownership. United Oil of the Carolinas, Inc. is a viable company based on Secretary of State information. Note: According to David Stoner's (Shield Engineering) email, dated Jan. 25, 2019, Techno, LLC assumed certain assets and obligations from Holding Bros., Inc. It is not clear, however, whether David Stoner's information pertains
to this site. Regardless, Techno, LLC was dissolved on September 28, 2018. The incident's risk and rank are High/157 risk because, as of the last sampling event done on June 19, 2018,
the groundwater exceeded the gross contaminant levels. Several water supply wells have been identified within 1,000 ft of the plume despite the availability of municipal water.
Ownership and Release Chronology 2/8/1999 Direct push sampling associated with a Preliminary Site Assessment of the property was
conducted for NCDOT (report delivered to NCDEHNR on 6/2/1999) in the right of way easement area. Five USTs (4 in a tank basin on the south side of the station and one kerosene tank to the north) were identified. TIMS data suggests there were actually 6 tanks installed at that time. Groundwater and soil near the western dispenser islands were found to contain petroleum contaminants, likely gasoline. 5/18/2001 Site Check Report delivered to NCDENR following a NORR issued by NCDENR to Holding Brothers, Inc. on 8/31/2000 and several granted extensions to the due date. The reader should be alerted that errors exist in several maps of the site (e.g., the UST basin is depicted as being north of the store building while it was, in fact south of the building and the site location is incorrect in Figure 1). Results from soil samples collected near the kerosene UST and dispenser and the eastern gasoline dispenser were above action levels. The consultant recommended a Limited Site Assessment.
10/30/2001 A Phase 2 LSA was delivered to NCDENR. Groundwater contamination and 2 WSWs within 1,000 ft of the source were identified. A CSA was recommended by the consultant.

11/2/2001 CSA NORR issued by NCDENR. 5/2/2002 CSA delivered to NCDENR. Benzene, 1,2-DCA and EDB above GCLs in MW-2 with 2L
standards exceeded in several wells for one or more compounds. Landmarks and map orientation are correct in figures presented in this report. Groundwater flow direction toward the northeast is inferred.
5/9/2002 CAP NORR issued by NCDENR. 1/13/2003 Property purchased by United Oil of the Carolinas. 7/18/2003 Holding Bros. Inc is dissolved (see attached Articles of Dissolution) 10/17/2003 CAP Delivered to NCDENR. An AS/SVE system was the recommended corrective action. RP listed as Techno, LLC for Holding Brothers, Inc. 10/30/2003 In a NORR from Cindy Rintoul of NCDENR to David Holding, the plan and schedule presented in the CAP was approved.
10/31/2004 NCDENR assigns RRA at H155D and the RP was advised that that risk was insufficient to obtain funding from the trust fund for further work.
12/27/2007 A groundwater monitoring report presents the results of a groundwater monitoring event conducted on 11/19/2007. Free product not detected. GCLs exceeded in MW-2 with 2L exceedances for
certain compounds in MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-5 and T-1. The report notes that the remediation system approved in 2003 had not been installed and a MMPE was recommended by the consultant to expedite cleanup. 4/29/2009 A monitoring report presents the results of sampling following the MMPE event recommended in the 2007 report. A total of 32.48 gallons of VOCs were estimated to be recovered during the MMPE event. While COC concentrations were generally reduced, groundwater still exceeded 2L standards. Implementation of the CAP recommended. Consultant notes that much of the subsurface portion of an AS/SVE system has already been installed and other remediation system components are available from another remediated Techno Holdings incident. Six AS and 7 SVE wells appear on site maps.
10/21/2010 CSA Addendum delivered. Additional soil characterization, with several soil-to-gw and residential exceedances, led to a consultant recommendation that no soil excavation be conducted at that time. MTBE concentration at MW-4 increased. Implementation of the CAP recommended. Additional
remediation cost estimates provided. NCDEQ disagrees and requests a Trust Fund authorization for excavation in discrete areas in a letter dated 12/17/2010.
10/25/2012 Monitoring report delivered. Excavation via overdrilling was planned at three locations (contamination identified at SB-4, SB-14 and SB-8) but only accomplished in one boring due to the location of underground utilities. Eleven drums of soil removed from around boring SB-8 (near the western dispenser island), which was advanced during the CSA Addendum work. SB-4 and SB-8 were located near the kerosene tank and dispenser. RP recommended bi-weekly air sparging. 3/19/2013 to 5/5/2015 Eighteen bi-weekly air sparging events, of 6 hour duration, are conducted and reported along with monitoring results in reports received 9/23/13, 9/2/14 and 6/29/15. Benzene concentrations in MW-2 (the only MW with GCL exceedances) declined from 12,600 µg/L to 6,410 µg/L in the monitoring reports.

4/28/2016 to 8/13/2018 Four groundwater monitoring reports delivered. Air sparging events ceased.
Concentrations of several COCs (benzene, EDB and 1,2-DCA) remain above GCLs in MW-2. Groundwater flow direction shifts from northeasterly to east-southeast during this period.
9/28/2018 Techno Holdings LLC dissolved (see attached Articles of Dissolution). 11/15/2018 A tank closure report was prepared for United Oil of the Carolinas and delivered to DEQ. Two 8,000-
gallon gasoline, two 4,000-gallon gasoline, one 4,000-gallon diesel, and one 1,000-gallon kerosene USTs, associated dispensers and product piping were removed. Contamination above TPH action levels was observed near the western dispenser island and the kerosene tank/dispenser, where contamination was previously known to exist. Overburden and over-excavation soils (22.44 tons) was removed from the kerosene tank basin and dispenser area. TPH was not detected in sample collected from the bottom of the kerosene tank basin following over-excavation. 7/10/2020 Site visit conducted by CAB staff. Spoke to property owner at Lopp Welding, who owns the closest nearby water supply well located approximately 450 ft to the south of the source area. The current property owner of the former Texaco Food Mart #2 property is 2418 N. Main, LLC. Site grading is underway for a Cook Out restaurant.
Please contact me at [e-mail] or [phone] with any questions.
NCDEQ UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SECTION
RISK, RANK, AND ABATEMENT RATING FORM
Incident Name:Texaco Food Mart #2 Region:HIncident Number:22332 County:SCORE 157Date:7/15/2020 Ranked By:D
Note: a new ranking form must be completed whenever site conditions may have changed, or at least once every 5 years
SECTION I. Initial Risk Classification (Check all that apply)
1. High Risk
All UST and Non-UST Petroleum Releases
A.
B.
C.
D.
Commercial UST, Noncommercial Farm UST, and Non-UST Petroleum Releases Only
E.x
F.
G.
Noncommercial UST Releases Only (including Noncommercial Gasoline or Diesel Farm USTs)
H.
I.
J.
2. Intermediate Risk (Commercial UST and Non-UST Releases Only)
A.
B.

C.
D.

E.
3. Low Risk
A.
SECTION I. Risk Classification
A water supply well not used for drinking water is located within 250 feet of the source area of a confirmed release; or
The groundwater within 500 feet of the source area of a confirmed release has the potential for future use in that there is
no source of water supply other than the groundwater;
A water supply well, including one used for non-drinking purposes, is located within 150 feet of the source area of a
confirmed release;
The source area of a confirmed release is located within a designated wellhead protection area, per 42 USC 300h-7(e);
The levels of groundwater contamination associated with a confirmed release for any contaminant (except ethylene
dibromide, benzene and the aliphatic and aromatic carbon fraction classes) exceed 50 percent of the solubility of the
contaminant at 25 degrees Celsius or 1,000 times the groundwater quality standard or interim standard established in 15A
NCAC 2L .0202, whichever is lower (these levels have been termed “gross contamination levels”); or
The levels of groundwater contamination associated with a confirmed release for ethylene dibromide or benzene exceed
1,000 times the federal drinking water standard set out in 40 CFR 141(these levels have also been termed “gross
contamination levels”).
A low risk classification means that the risk posed by a release does not meet any of the high or intermediate risk
criteria or, based on site-specific information received by the Department, the release does not pose a significant risk.
An existing water supply well, including one used for non-drinking purposes, has been contaminated by any UST release or
any non-UST petroleum release;
There exists a serious threat of explosion due to the accumulation of vapors in a confined space, as a result of the release;
Unassessed free product has been found within 30 feet of a property boundary with a landowner other than the
responsible party for the release; or
There exists an imminent danger to public health, public safety or the environment, as a result of the release.
Surface water is located within 500 feet of the source area of a confirmed release and the maximum groundwater
contaminant concentration exceeds the applicable surface water quality standard and criteria found in 15A NCAC 2B .0200
by a factor of 10;
In the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province (as designated on a map entitled Geologic Map of North Carolina published by
the Department in 1985), the source area of a confirmed release is located where there is recharge to an unconfined or
semi-confined deeper aquifer which the Department determines is being used or may be used as a source of drinking
water;
Vapors from the discharge or release pose a serious exposure risk through vapor intrusion into inhabited structures; or
An unabated surface exposure of free product remains present at a confirmed release from a noncommercial UST.
A water supply well used for drinking water is located within 1,000 feet of the source area of a confirmed release;
W-S
Davidson
DLW
H
UST/200 Rev 2016-08_P Pg 1 of 8
Incident # SECTION II. Risk Classification (Assign points as applicable)
1. EMERGENCY HAZARD ASSESSMENT E - FLAG
Complete form with letter "E" assigned to final rating. Once Emergency is abated, a new rating must be prepared.
2. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
Groundwater
A. Impacted Water Supplies
Public Supply Wells (each well can only be counted once)
0 x 600 =0
Private Supply Wells (each well can only be counted once)
0 x 200 =0
0 x 75 =0
Public or Private Wells below 2L .0202 Standards (each well can only be counted once)
0 x 100 =0
B. Threat to Uncontaminated Drinking Water Supplies
Public Supply Wells (each well can only be counted once)
v 0 x 40 =0
0 x 10 =0
Private Supply Wells (each well can only be counted once)
x 20 =0
x 10 =0
3 x 5 =15
6 x 2 =12
Surface Water
10 :
5 :
1. Public or institutional water supply well containing substances in concentrations exceeding 15A
NCAC 2L groundwater quality standards. 600 pts ea.
2. Private domestic drinking water supply well containing substances in concentrations exceeding 15A
NCAC 2L groundwater quality standards. 200 pts ea.
3. Private well, not used for drinking, containing contamination in detectable concentrations.
75 pts ea.
4. Public or private drinking water supply containing substances that are below the 15A NCAC 2L
groundwater quality standards. 100 pts ea.TOTALCOUNTx
POINTS=
22332
An emergency situation exists if the Department determines that the release poses an imminent danger to public health, public
safety, or the environment. (Flag if true, leave blank if no emergency is apparent.)
1. Violation of Class HQW, ORW, WS-I, WS-II, or SA surface water quality standards as a result of groundwater
discharge. 10 pts total.
2. Free product or sheen discovered on surface waters as a result of groundwater discharge. 5 pts total.
1. Public or institutional water supply well within 500 ft of commercial or farm UST or non-UST plume
edge, or 100 feet of noncommercial UST plume edge; plume edge is within radius of influence of
public well; or threat currently unknown. 40 pts ea.
2. Public or institutional water supply well between 500 and 1000 ft of commercial or farm UST or non-
UST plume edge, or 100 and 150 feet of noncommercial UST plume edge; or threat is reasonably
known. 10 pts ea.
3. Private water supply, including non-drinking well, located within 250 ft of commercial or farm UST
or non-UST plume edge, or 150 ft of noncommercial UST plume edge and wells threatened or threat is
currently unknown. 20 pts ea.
4. Private drinking water supply, located between 251 and 500 ft of commercial or farm UST or non-
UST plume edge and wells are threatened or threat is currently unknown. 10 pts ea.
5. Private drinking water supply, located between 501 and 1000 ft of commercial or farm UST or non-
UST plume edge; or wells located within 1000 ft but threat to wells is reasonably known; or an
alternate water source is available. 5 pts ea.
6. Private non-drinking water supply, located between 251 & 1000 ft of commercial or farm UST or
non-UST plume edge;. 2 pts ea.
UST/200 Rev 2016-08_P Pg 2 of 8
Incident #
Section II.2: Surface Water (cont.)
A. Land Use (Choose soil cleanup level. Apply points only if soil contamination exceeds requirement.)
5 :5
10 :
15 :
Air Quality
A. Vapor Phase Exposure
20 :
5 :
3. HYDROGEOLOGY and LITHOLOGY
A. Bedrock
20 :
B. Vertical Contaminant Migration
10 :10
C. Horizontal Contaminant Migration
5 :5
4. ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
A. Existing Groundwater Quality - Worst-Case Monitor or Supply Well (assign only one)
5 :
20 :
40 :40
80 :
B. Predominant Contamination Type
20 :20
0 :
5. CONTAMINANT SOURCE ABATEMENT (from Section III)
A. Rank Contributions from Section III: Source Abatement Assignment (automated)
100 :
50 :50
SECTION II. Release Ranking 157
2. Abatement letter "D" assigned due to a contaminated soil source remaining. 50 pts total.
1. Maximum soil contaminant concentration exceeds "Soil to Groundwater" but below "Residential" exposure
concentration. 5 pts total.
2. Maximum soil contaminant concentration exceeds "Residential" but below "Industrial Commercial"
exposure concentration. 10 pts total.
3. Maximum soil contaminant concentration exceeds the "Industrial/Commercial" exposure concentration or
no risk-based data is available. 15 pts total.
1. Contaminant vapors detected in inhabitable building(s), but levels are below 20% of the lower explosive limit
and health concern levels. 20 pts total.
2. Contaminant vapors detected in other confined areas (uninhabited buildings, sewer lines, utility vaults, etc.)
but levels are below 20% of the lower explosive limit. 5 pts total.
Contamination is located in, on, or within five (5) feet of bedrock. 20 pts total.
Literature or well logs indicate that no confining layer is present above bedrock or within 20 feet of land
surface. 10 pts total.
Data or observations indicate that no discharge points or aquifer discontinuities exist between the discharge,
release, or known extent of contamination and the nearest down-gradient drinking water supply. 5 pts total.
1. Concentrations at less than 10 times the 2L groundwater standards. 5 pts total.
2. Concentrations between 10 and 100 times the 2L groundwater standards. 20 pts total.
3. Concentrations greater than 100 times the 2L groundwater standards. 40 pts total.TOTAL22332
4. Free product is present. 80 pts total.
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR POINTS:
1. Low boiling-point petroleum productes (gasoline, aviation fuel). 20 pts total.
2. High boiling-point petroleum products (fuel oil, kerosene, diesel fuel, etc). 0 pts.
1. Abatement letter "A" assigned due to an active UST system present onsite. 100 pts total.
No Risk Data Soil to GW Residential Ind/Comm
UST/200 Rev 2016-08_P Pg 3 of 8
Incident # SECTION III. Source Abatement Assignment (Assign Letter)
1. Abated or Unabated Contaminant Source
A. Emergency Situation E
0
OR
B. Active UST System 100 :A

OR
C. Residual Soil Contamination 50 :D
D
OR
D. Contaminant Sources Abated R

SECTION III. Source Abatement Assignment D
SECTION IV. Risk, Rank, and Abatement Score
Total: Risk, Rank, and Abatement Score H 157 D
(Use Risk letter from Section I, total of all Rank points from Section II, and Abatement letter from Section III. Transfer final score to Page 1)
22332
The UST release has been abated and contaminated soil has been removed or remediated.
Assign Letter "R". (No points added to Rank in Section II.5.)
An Emergency condition must be immediately abated. Assign letter "E" (and see Section II.1).
UST Systems remain in operation and continue to discharge into the environment.
Assign Letter "A". (+100 points added to Rank.)
The UST release has been abated, however, contaminated soil continues to relase product or contaminants
into the environment. Assign Letter "D". (+50 points added to Rank in Section II.5.)
UST/200 Rev 2016-08_P Pg 4 of 8
UST/200 Rev 2016-08_P Pg 5 of 8
UST/200 Rev 2016-08_P Pg 6 of 8
UST/200 Rev 2016-08_P Pg 7 of 8
UST/200 Rev 2016-08_P Pg 8 of 8
Estkowski, Linda
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Ladies,
David Stoner <[e-mail]>
Wednesday, December 12, 2018 4:48 PM
Kromm, Carin; Estkowski, Linda
Matthew Smith
[External] Techno, LLC Dissolution and Sites Transfer
Techno, LLC Dissolution
As we informed Scott Ryals and Scott Bullock on November 27, 2018, Techno, LLC has been dissolved since September
28, 2018. Pl ease see the attached email regarding the notice of dissolution. As you can see by the attached, Techno,
LLC had three active projects (K & Kahn, Texaco Food Mart #2, and West Lexington Sav-A-Sum) and one or two inactive
projects (Raleigh Road Texaco Food Mart #1, and possibly Speedy's BBQ) managed by the Winston-Salem Regional
Office. The treatment systems at these sites were all requested to be shut down by the NCDEQ regardless of our
recommendations otherwise. We reached out to Scott Ryals at the State Lead Program and he has asked us to transfer
the electric power for the treatment systems to him. Any help you can provide in regards to transferring these sites to
the State Lead program or closing out these sites would be appreciated.
Thank you,
David
David A. Stoner, P.G., P.E.
Sr. Principal/Vice President
Shield Engineering, Inc. 's Risk Management Group
430 I Taggart Creek Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28208
ph. [phone]
fax [phone]
e-mail [e-mail]
Shield Engineering's Action Environmental Group is now Shield Engineering's Risk Management Group with
additional expertise and service lines!
Don't forg et to visit our new website and sign up for our newsletter and stay up-to-date on what's going on
at Shield Engineering! Click the following link to sign up (http://eepurl.com/bb5mMn).
This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL,
and/or may contain ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of
the message and its attachments and notify us immediately. Thank you.
Estkowski, Linda
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
David Stoner <[e-mail]>
Thursday, January 24, 2019 6:22 PM
Estkowski, Linda
[External) Techno, LLC Dissolution and Sites Transfer
Holding Brothers Inc. Articles of Dissolution.pdf; Techno, LLC Dissolution.PDF
CAUTION:,:•;11 l,'11-11 !11l-lli.ll)rJ11lr),,.llt'1'.<'li1I'.<; •if •lil Ill .1,.1 1i1J11I !111, 11111 'i, '/•l'l"i !dr•;.•·j 111,i .111 ill i1Ji,d,JII, !11I ill I, 111 I.• 1•,11111 )1 1• (<r
i l•I•ln(: l•l-h'it<•1)1lr;;:(•\l/
Hi Linda, please see my answers to your questions below in blue font.
Regards,
David
David A. Stoner, P.G., P .E.
Sr. Principal/Vice President
Shield Engineering, Inc. 's Risk Management Group
430 I Taggart Creek Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28208
ph. [phone]
fax [phone]
e-mail [e-mail]
Shield Engineering's Action Environmental Group is now Shield Engineering's Risk Managem ent Group with
additional expertise and service lines!
Don't forget to visit our new website and sign up for our newsletter and stay up-to-date on what's going on
at Shield Engineering! Click the following link to sign up (http://eepurl.com/bbSmMn).
This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and contains information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL,
and/or contain ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message
and its attachments and noti us immediate) . Thank you. ___ __ _
From: Estkowski, Linda [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 3:25 PM
To: David Stoner
Cc: Estkowski, Linda
Subject: RE: [External] Techno, LLC Dissolution and Sites Transfer
Hello David,
I am reviewing the sites that you requested be put into the State Lead program.
Our records indicate:
1. Techno,LLC and Holding Brothers, Inc. as t he rp(s) for K&Kahn (inc.#19423) and West Lexington Sav-A-Sum
(inc.#6237). Tech no, LLC never owned or operated any USTs so they are not a Responsible Party (RP). Holding
Bros., Inc. has been dissolved since 2003, after notice to the State and the conveyance of certain assets and
obligations to Techno, LLC. Certain K&Kahn/West Lexington Sav-A-Sum assets and obligations were among
those conveyed to Techno, LLC. No underground storage tanks (USTs) w ere among those assets conveyed to
Techno, LLC. Since 2003, Techno, LLC has addressed the contamination at these sites in connection with the
conveyance from Holding Bros., Inc.
2. Holding Brothers as the rp for NCDOT-Speedy's Bar BQ (inc. #30384) The RP for this site should be Holding
Bros., Inc. No work has been required at this site since before the 2003 conveyance and dissolution of Holding
Bros., Inc.
3. Holding Brothers, Inc. and United Oil of the Carolinas as the rp(s) for Texaco Food Mart #1 (inc.#21962). Holding
Bros., Inc. would be the RP for the UST releases occurring before 2003. Unit ed Oil of the Carolinas bought the
USTs in 2003 and would be the RP for any release occurring after that purchase.
4. David Holding as the rp for Texaco Food Mart #2 (inc.#22332). David Holding, who is now 80 yea rs old and in full
retirement, never owned any USTs, and should not be listed as the RP for any sites. David Holding was the
Se cretary for Holding Bros., Inc. The RP for this sit e is Holding Bros., Inc.
Could you plea se tell me:
-Who the UST system owner(s) was at the time the releases were discovere d? In general, before the 2003
conveyance and disso lution, Holding Bros., Inc. owned the USTs at these sites when pre-2003 releases were
discove red.
-Is a present property owner or other non-rp doing the environmental work for the rp? Tech no, LLC has
undertaken the environmental work for pre-2003 Holding Bros., Inc. releases in connection with t he 2003 conveyance of
certain assets and liabilities from Holding Bros., Inc. The one exception is Speedy's BBQ, w hich has not had any
environmental work required since before 2003. USTs at the Texaco Food Mart #2 were sold to United Oil of the
Ca rolinas in in 2003. United Oil of the Carolinas would be the RP going forward for any releases occurring after t hat
2003 conveyance.
-Is there more than one rp for the sites? Not that I know of for any of the above sites, unless there were
releases since the Holding Bros., Inc. dissolution of 2003.
-Did one company buy out another company? Please provide documentation if this is the case. Some of the
assets and obligations of Holding Bros., Inc. were sold to United Oil of the Carolinas circa 2003. Other assets and
liabilities but none of the above USTs were conveyed to Hill Oil Company, Inc. circa 2003, and still other assets and
obligations but no USTs were conveyed to Tech no, LLC around the sa me time. I don't have the documentation of
these conveyances. I do have the Articles of Dissolution of Holding Bros., Inc. and Techno, LLC attached.
-Any other information pertinent to determining who the present rp(s) is for each site. For t he above UST
releases prior to 2003 the RP should be Holding Bros., Inc. For releases since 2003, United Oil of t he Carolinas would be
an RP for post 2003 releases at those sites where it bought USTs.
Thank you,
Linda
From: David Stoner <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 4:48 PM
To: Kromm, Carin <[e-mail]>; Estkowski, Linda <linda.estkowsk [e-mail]>
Cc: M atthew Smith <MSmith@shield engineering.com>
Subject: [External] Techno, LLC Dissolution and Sites Transfer
CAUTION: ::;11 )/'fi,JI ·mJ iil. JJrJ r)r)!',,:lir:Hir1:<, 1J(:1J:I :n; ),,,; 1,'.,1111 )fl•'; 'IOI:); n 1!'!ri ii or j,'·;•11 111 ,II ;11,;JJr,frJlj, '!rrl 1fl .1, Ill I•.<',, 1,iil' ,, 'J
~ '
Ladies,
As we informed Scott Ryals and Scott Bullock on November 27, 2018, Tech no, LLC has been dissolved since September
28, 2018. Please see t he attached email rega rding the notice of dissolution. As you ca n see by the at tached, Tec hno,
LLC had t hree active projects (K & Kahn, Texaco Food Mart #2, and West Lexington Sav-A-Sum) and one or two inactive
2
projects (Raleigh Road Texaco Food Mart #1, and possibly Speedy's BBQ) managed by the Winston-Salem Regional
Office. The treatment systems at these sites were all requested to be shut down by the NCDEQ regardless of our
recommendations otherwise. We reached out to Scott Ryals at the State Lead Program and he has asked us to transfer
the electric power for the treatment systems to him. Any help you can provide in regards to transferring these sites to
the State Lead program or closing out these sites would be appreciated.
Thank you,
David
David A. Stoner, P.G., P.E.
Sr. PrincipaWice President
Shield Engineering, Inc. 's Risk Management Group
430 I Taggart Creek Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28208
ph. [phone]
fax [phone]
e-mail [e-mail]
Shield Engineering's Action Environmental Group is now Shield Engineering's Risk Management Group with
additional expertise and service lines!
Don't forget to visit our new website and sign up for our newsletter and stay up -to-date on what's going on
at Shield Engineering! Click the following link to sign up (http://eepurl.com/bbSmMn).
This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFlDENTJAL,
and/or may contain ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of
the message and its attachments and notify us immediately. Thank you.
3
You are logged in to iBeam as Doug Whitmire.
Waste Management UST Facilities 5:00 PM EDT July 16, 2020
Cancel Find Facility Select Id
internet - Based enterprise application management© 2000-2005 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Contact
Contact Multi-Contact Change Financial Responsibility
Financial Provider
Financial Provider
Facility Identification
Facility Name Facility ID Owner Name Owner ID
CITGO FOOD MART 2 00-0-0000011600 UNITED OIL OF THE CAROLINAS, INC.24513
Facility Tank List [ - ]
ID#Product Size Status Install Date TemporaryClosed Date Permanently Closed Date Registration Received Billable Tank Upg Comp Tank Reg Tank Root Tank
1 Gasoline, Gas Mix8000 Removed 04/15/1984 12/18/2017 10/15/2018 Yes Yes Yes No Yes
2 Gasoline, Gas Mix8000 Removed 04/15/1984 12/18/2017 10/15/2018 Yes Yes Yes No Yes
3 Gasoline, Gas Mix2000 Removed 04/20/1965 05/31/1989 Yes Yes No No Yes
3A Gasoline, Gas Mix4000 Removed 05/31/1989 12/18/2017 10/15/2018 Yes Yes Yes No Yes
4 Diesel 1000 Removed 04/20/1965 05/31/1989 Yes Yes No No Yes
4A Gasoline, Gas Mix4000 Removed 05/31/1989 12/18/2017 10/15/2018 Yes Yes Yes No Yes
5 Kerosene, Kero
Mix
1000 Removed 04/15/1984 10/16/2018 Yes Yes Yes No Yes
6 Diesel 4000 Removed 07/01/1998 10/15/2018 Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Facility UST Facility Tanks Affiliates UST 8 CP Details UST 6A/6B Sump Details Contractor/Professional Engineer Documents Advanced Facility Search
Facility
Page 1 of 1DWM -UST Facilities -Tank Information
7/16/2020https://ibeam.ncdenr.org/wm/USTFacilities/tankInformation.do
You are logged in to iBeam as Doug Whitmire.
Waste Management UST Facilities 5:06 PM EDT July 16, 2020
New Cancel
internet -  Based enterprise application management
© 2000-2005 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Contact
Contact Multi-Contact Change Financial Responsibility
Financial Provider
Financial Provider
Facility ID: 00-0-0000011600
Comments: 

You have characters left.(Maximum characters: 3000)
Find Facility Select Id
Facility Name: CITGO FOOD MART 2
Facility Address: 1700 COTTON GROVE RD
LEXINGTON (Davidson)
NC 27292
Affiliates
Affiliate Type All Click to display excluding end date
No of Records to display 25 
Start Date End Date Affiliation Authorized Name ID
08/22/2012 Regulatory Operator No SHERRY REDWINE 221480
08/21/2012 12/31/2018 Primary Operator No DAVE DULMAGE 211373
03/07/2005 11/30/2017 Manager No AL GIBSON 129879
01/13/2003 Owner Yes UNITED OIL OF THE
CAROLINAS, INC.
24513
Last Update
By
Date
Facility UST Facility Tanks Affiliates UST 8 CP Details UST 6A/6B Sump Details Contractor/Professional Engineer Documents Advanced Facility Search
Facility
Page 1 of 1DWM -UST Facilities -Affiliates
7/16/2020https://ibeam.ncdenr.org/wm/USTFacilities/affiliates.do
Copyright (C) 2009 MyTopo
SCALE 1:24000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
FEET
Declination
MN 8.13° W
MN
Location: 035.7780400° N 080.2593780° WDate: 10/07/18
Scale: 1 inch = 2,000 ft.
Copyright (C) 2009 MyTopo
Figure 1
Site Location Map
Texaco Food Mart #2
1700 Cotton Grove Rd, Lexington, Davidson County, NC
Incident No. 22332
GRI Project No. 4811