WS-6081_22332_CA_MRP_20221223

ENVIRONMENTAL | CIVIL | GEOTECHNICAL
MONITORING REPORT FORMER TEXACO FOOD MART #2 1700 COTTON GROVE ROAD LEXINGTON, DAVIDSON COUNTY, NC NCDEQ INCIDENT NO. 22332 RISK CLASSIFICATION: H157D

DECEMBER 23, 2022 NCDEQ CONTRACT NO. N122019D TASK AUTHORIZATION NO. 02 CATLIN PROJECT NO. 221185 PREPARED FOR: MR. MARK PATERMANN NCDEQ, DWM, UST SECTION 1646 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NC 27699-1646 PREPARED BY: CATLIN ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS 220 OLD DAIRY ROAD WILMINGTON, NC 28405 [phone]
CORPORATE LICENSURE NO. FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES C-0585
CORPORATE LICENSURE NO. FOR GEOLOGY SERVICES C-118

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 SITE INFORMATION 1
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 2
4.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION 3
4.1 UST OWNER AND OPERATOR INFORMATION 3 4.2 UST INFORMATION 3 4.3 CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY 4 4.4 SITE CHARACTERISTICS 4 4.5 OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS OF ADJOINING/NEARBY PROPERTIES AND LAND USE 4 4.6 RECEPTOR INFORMATION 4 4.7 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES 4
5.0 REGIONAL AND SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 6
5.1 SOIL AND BEDROCK 6
5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY 6
6.0 SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION 6
6.1 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION 7 6.2 GAUGING DATA 7 6.3 SAMPLING DATA 8 6.4 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER INFORMATION 9 6.5 EVALUATION OF ASSESSMENT INFORMATION 10
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10
8.0 STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATION 11
9.0 LIMITATIONS 12
10.0 REFERENCES 12

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022
TABLES
TABLE 1 SITE HISTORY – UST AND OTHER RELEASE INFORMATION
TABLE 2 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS AND OTHER RECEPTOR INFORMATION
TABLE 3 WELL CONSTRUCTION AND GAUGING DATA – NOVEMBER 25, 2022
TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS – STANDARD METHOD 6200B
FIGURES FIGURE 1 SITE VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 2 POTENTIAL RECEPTOR MAP
FIGURE 3A SITE MAP
FIGURE 3B SITE MAP
FIGURE 4 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION – NOVEMBER 25, 2022
FIGURE 5 MONITORING WELL GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS – NOVEMBER 25, 2022

APPENDICES APPENDIX A HISTORICAL DATA
APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX C JOB HAZARD ANALYSES AND FIELD DATA SHEETS
APPENDIX D WELL LOGS AND WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORDS
APPENDIX E LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENT

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 1 December 2022
1.0 SITE INFORMATION
Site Identification
Date: 12/23/22 Site Risk/Priority Rank: H157D
UST Number: WS-6081 Incident Number: 22332
Site Name: Former Texaco Food Mart #2 Facility ID: 00-0-0011600
Site Location: 1700 Cotton Grove Rd
Nearest City/Town: Lexington County: Davidson
Description of Geographical Data Point: Monitoring Well MW-1
Location Method: Google Earth
Latitude (decimal degrees): 35.77818° Longitude (decimal degrees): -80.25943°
Contacts Information
UST Owner: Multiple (See Table 1)
Address: NA Phone: NA
UST Operator: Multiple (See Table 1)
Address: NA Phone: NA
Property Owner: Cook Out – Cotton Grove, Inc.
Address: PO Box 698, Thomasville, NC 27361 Phone (Attorney): [phone]
Property Occupant: Cook Out
Address: 1700 Cotton Grove Rd, Lexington, NC 27292 Phone: [phone]
Consultant: CATLIN Engineers and Scientists (CATLIN)
Address: 220 Old Dairy Rd., Wilmington, NC 28405 Phone: [phone]
Corporate Licensure No. For Engineering Services: C-0585
Corporate Geology License No.: C-118
Analytical Laboratory: Con-Test Analytical Laboratory State Certification: NC 652, NC-DW 25703
Address: 39 Spruce St., E. Longmeadow, MA 01028 Phone: [phone]
Release Information
Date Discovered: 02/08/99
Estimated Quantity of Release: Unknown
Cause of Release: Leak in the UST system(s)
Source of Release: UST system or associated fitting(s)
Sizes and contents of UST system(s) from which the release occurred:
• Two 8,000-gallon gasoline USTs
• Two 4,000-gallon gasoline USTs
• One 1,000-gallon kerosene UST
• One 4,000-gallon diesel UST
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 2 December 2022
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Former Texaco Food Mart #2 site is located at 1700 Cotton Grove Road,
Lexington, Davidson County, North Carolina. Six underground storage tanks (USTs)
historically operated at the site. A petroleum release was discovered during site assessment activities in 1999. Two 8,000-gallon gasoline, two 4,000-gallon gasoline, one 1,000-gallon kerosene, and one 4,000-gallon diesel USTs were removed from the site in 2018.

The purpose of this report is to document monitoring well installation and the latest groundwater sampling event. On November 15, 2022, CATLIN Engineers and Scientists (CATLIN) personnel advanced three borings for construction of Type II monitoring wells (MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03) to 30 feet below land surface (BLS).

CATLIN returned to the site on November 25, 2022 to sample the newly installed wells. Groundwater was measured at approximately 21.5 feet deep across the site. Groundwater samples from the three monitoring wells were collected. The samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) per
Standard Method (SM) 6200B plus ethylene dibromide (EDB), methyl tert-butyl ether
(MTBE) and diisopropyl ether (DIPE). Multiple VOCs were detected in the MW-01 sample at concentrations greater than those established in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code,
Subchapter 2L, Section .0202 Groundwater Quality Standards (2L GWQS).
Benzene and EDB were detected above their Gross Contaminant Levels (GCL) in the MW-01 sample. Only benzene was above its 2L GWQS in the MW-03 sample. CATLIN recommends installing additional monitoring wells in an attempt to delineate
the horizontal and vertical extent of GCL impacted groundwater and determine
vertical gradient. It is also recommended to sample the three active water supply wells within 1,000 feet of the site. 3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of services for this report was performed in general accordance with CATLIN proposal number 221185.2P, dated October 19, 2022. Services were authorized by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ’s) Task Authorization (TA) #02, approved on October 19, 2022, and Contract Number
N122019D. The approved scope of services for this Task Authorization included to:
• Coordinate access with the property owners’ lawyers;
• Update the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP);
• Install three Type II monitoring wells up to 30 feet BLS;
• Survey the top of casing (TOC) elevations of the new wells;
• Collect three groundwater samples (one from each new well);
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 3 December 2022
• Analyze five water samples (three monitoring wells, one field blank, and one trip blank) per SM 6200B (plus EDB, MTBE, and DIPE); and
• Prepare a monitoring report summarizing the findings.
The scope of services was conducted in general accordance with the approved TA. 4.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION The Former Texaco Food Mart #2 site is located at 1700 Cotton Grove Road, Lexington, Davidson County, North Carolina (Figures 1 and 2). Summarized available historical sampling and gauging data from previous consultants are
provided in Appendix A. Recent site photographs are presented in Appendix B. 4.1 UST OWNER AND OPERATOR INFORMATION Holding Bros, Inc. (Holding Bros) owned the six USTs historically operated
on-site. The tanks were operated by Holding Bros for petroleum retail sales until 2003, when the property and tank ownership were transferred to United Oil of the Carolinas, Inc. (United Oil) (NCDEQ, 2020). Holding Bros is now dissolved, and it is not clear if another release occurred during United Oil’s ownership (Stoner, 2019). The site was accepted into the North Carolina
UST Section Trust Fund Branch State Lead Program in 2021 (NCDEQ, 2021B). Available information regarding UST owners/operators is presented on Table 1.
4.2 UST INFORMATION Two 8,000-gallon gasoline, two 4,000-gallon gasoline, one 1,000-gallon kerosene, and one 4,000-gallon diesel USTs were historically operated on-
site. The tanks were installed in 1984 (Tanks 1, 2, and 5), 1989 (Tanks 3A and 4A), and 1998 (Tank 6) and reportedly operated until October 9, 2018. The tanks were removed from the site on October 15 and 16, 2018 (NCDEQ, 2018).
A previous UST system consisting of one 2,000-gallon gasoline and one 1,000-gallon diesel USTs were installed in 1965. They were reportedly removed in 1989 and replaced with Tanks 3A and 4A. These tanks were not historically associated with the release (NCDENR, 2020).
Available UST system information is presented in Table 1 and the approximate former UST system locations are illustrated on Figure 3.
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 4 December 2022
4.3 CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY An on-site release was discovered in 1999 during site assessment activities.
Soil sample analytical results revealed total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)
gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range organics (DRO) above their respective State Action Levels (Ogden, 1999). 4.4 SITE CHARACTERISTICS

The property is owned by Cook Out – Cotton Grove, Inc. and the property is occupied by a Cook Out fast-food restaurant. The parcel is comprised of the restaurant building and paved parking areas. Site photographs are presented in Appendix B.
4.5 OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS OF ADJOINING/NEARBY PROPERTIES AND LAND USE Properties in the site vicinity are a mix of commercial businesses, residences,
and undeveloped wooded land. The site is bound by Cedar Lane to the north
and Cotton Grove Road to the west. Other fast-food restaurants are located to the south and north (across Cedar Lane). A gas station/convenience mart and hotel are located across Cotton Grove Road to the west and northwest, respectively. Wooded land adjoins the site to the east.
4.6 RECEPTOR INFORMATION The most recent receptor survey for the site was conducted by CATLIN in 2021. A summary of pertinent receptor information is described below.
Potential receptors are illustrated on Figure 2 and receptor information
obtained from CATLIN (2021) is shown on Table 2. Based on correspondence with the City of Lexington Water Resources department, municipal water should be available to all properties in the site
vicinity. Twelve water supply wells have been identified within 1,500 feet of
the site. No water supply wells were within 500 feet of the site. Within 1,000 feet of the site, three active potable wells and eight inactive wells were identified. One active potable and one inactive well are located between 1,000 and 1,500 feet from the site.
No surface water bodies were identified within 1,500 feet of the site during the last receptor survey. 4.7 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES
The release was discovered in 1999 during a Preliminary Site Assessment (PSA) for the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT). Soil samples obtained from the right-of-way (ROW) adjoining the site reportedly contained TPH GRO up to 1,200 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and TPH
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 5 December 2022
DRO up to 1,300 mg/kg (Ogden, 1999). A subsequent Site Check Report in May 2001 identified soil contamination above State Action Levels in the vicinity of the kerosene UST and dispenser, and the eastern gasoline
dispenser (NCDEQ, 2020).
A Phase II Limited Site Assessment (LSA) published in October 2001 identified groundwater contamination in two water supply wells (WSW-1 and WSW-4) within 1,000 feet of the site (NCDEQ, 2020).

Shield Engineering, Inc. (Shield) provided a Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) in May 2002. A total of six shallow/Type II monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-6) and one deep/Type III monitoring well (T-1) were installed. Soil sampling analytical results revealed multiple VOCs above their Soil-to-
Groundwater (STGW) Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentrations (MSCCs).
1,2-Dibromoethane was also reported above its Residential MSCC. Laboratory analysis of the groundwater samples reported several VOCs, volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH), and/or extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) above their 2L GWQS in the samples from MW-1,
MW-2, MW-3, and T-1. Benzene, 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and EDB
also exceeded their GCL in the sample from MW-2 (Shield, 2002). A Corrective Action Plan (CAP) was also issued in May 2002 and received by the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
(NCDENR, now NCDEQ) in October 2003. An Air Sparge and Soil Vapor
Extraction (AS/SVE) system was recommended for remediation (NCDEQ, 2020). Multiple groundwater monitoring and soil sampling events were conducted by
various parties between 2007 and 2018, including a CSA Addendum in 2010.
The highest contaminant concentrations have been in samples from MW-2 and MW-3. Dissolved phase petroleum constituents at concentrations above 2L GWQS persisted in samples from MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, and T-1. Petroleum contaminant concentrations have fluctuated in samples from
monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5. Light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL,
aka free-phase product) has not been previously detected on-site. Benzene, 1,2-DCA, and EDB were consistently above their GCL in samples from MW-2 (NCDEQ, 2020; Shield, 2018).
Remediation activities have included multi-phase mobile extraction (MMPE)
and air sparging events. The 2009 MMPE removed a total of 32.48 gallons of VOCs from the subsurface, and in 2018 1,588 gallons of impacted groundwater were recovered. Eighteen bi-weekly air sparging events were conducted between 2013 and 2015 (NCDEQ, 2020; Shield, 2018).

The on-site USTs were removed in 2018 by Geological Resources, Inc. (GRI). Approximately 139.69 tons of soil were excavated during UST closure activities, including removal of overburden and over-excavated soils from the 8,000-gallon gasoline UST basins and the kerosene dispenser. Confirmation
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 6 December 2022
soil samples revealed TPH GRO and/or DRO concentrations above their regulatory action levels in the samples from beneath the gasoline kerosene UST (Tank 5) and one 8,000-gallon gasoline UST (Tank 2). Concentrations
of TPH GRO were reported up to 1,952 mg/kg and TPH DRO up to 3,567
mg/kg (GRI, 2018). During the receptor survey conducted by CATLIN in 2021, it was observed that the subject site was undergoing redevelopment to build a new
restaurant. Subsequently, all previously installed monitoring and AS/SVE
wells appeared to have been destroyed (CATLIN, 2021). Summarized available historical sampling and gauging data from previous consultants are provided in Appendix A.
5.0 REGIONAL AND SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 5.1 SOIL AND BEDROCK
As defined in the Geologic Map of North Carolina, published by the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development (1985), the site lies within the Piedmont physiographic province. The site is underlain by a metamorphosed mafic rock formation within the
Charlotte Belt. According to the 1985 Geologic Map of North Carolina, metagabbro, metadiorite, and mafic plutonic-volcanic complexes crop out in the site area. Monitoring well installation (MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03) boring logs and
field observations indicate that the paved asphalt surfaces are immediately underlain with gravel and sand to one foot BLS, then silty clay is present to approximately 15 feet BLS. Clayey silt was encountered from approximately 15 to 32 feet BLS. Silty, highly plastic clay was observed at further depths.
5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY
Groundwater – According to the 2002 CSA, there is a relatively flat hydraulic gradient at the site of 0.0033 feet per foot. Slug tests identified a groundwater velocity of 0.186 feet per year (ft./year) in MW-1 and 1.11 ft./year in MW-2,
and an average estimated velocity for the entire site of 0.65 ft./year (Shield, 2002).

Surface Water – No surface water bodies were identified within 1,500 feet of the site.
6.0 SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION Field activities included installing three monitoring wells (MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03), surveying the TOC elevations of the new wells, and collecting three
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 7 December 2022
groundwater samples (one from each new well). Prior to completing any field activities, a site-specific HASP was prepared. Daily safety briefings detailing hazards identified in the task specific job hazard analysis (JHA) sheets were
conducted prior to initiating field work. The JHAs are included in Appendix C.
6.1 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION On November 15, 2022, three borings were advanced to 30 feet BLS for
monitoring well construction by a North Carolina Certified Well Contractor,
utilizing hollow stem augers and a Diedrich D-50 model drill rig. Cuttings generated during drilling activities were spread in a grassy area behind the building. Split spoon samples were collected in approximately two-foot intervals in general accordance with NCDEQ Guidelines and Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Region 4 Operating Procedures. Soil samples were
field screened using a photoionization detector (PID). The PID concentrations are available in the Well Logs (Appendix D). No samples were collected for laboratory analysis.
The wells (MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03) were constructed of new, threaded
PVC casing and screen. No glues or cements were used in joining PVC components. New nitrile gloves were worn while handling all well materials. The monitoring wells were constructed with a pointed PVC sediment trap, 15 feet of 2-inch diameter, 0.010-inch slotted PVC well screen and
approximately 14.5 feet of 2-inch diameter solid PVC riser to 0.5 feet below
the surface. The annular space was filled with coarse sand pack to approximately two feet above the well screen and bentonite chips to within 0.5 feet (MW-01), one foot (MW-02), and 0.6 feet (MW-03) of the ground surface. The bentonite chips were poured from the surface while
simultaneously pouring water to facilitate hydration. The wells were finished
with a concrete pad and flush-mount steel wellhead and locking well cap. After installation, the monitoring wells were developed by over-pumping. The TOC elevations were measured using traditional methods (Rod and Level).
Monitoring well construction information is summarized on Table 3 and a site
map with monitoring well location is illustrated on Figure 3. Site photographs are presented in Appendix B. The TOC survey sheet and field boring logs are included in Appendix C. The Well Logs and Well Construction Records were submitted to DEQ on December 2, 2022; copies are provided in Appendix D.
6.2 GAUGING DATA Historically, depth to water in the shallow monitoring wells has ranged from 16.38 feet below top of casing (BTOC) (MW-4) to 24.76 feet BTOC (MW-5).
LNAPL has not been previously detected at the site. Groundwater flow
direction has been previously illustrated converging towards the west (Shield, 2018).
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 8 December 2022
During the November 2022 event, CATLIN personnel measured depth to water in three monitoring wells using an electronic water interface probe. To prevent cross contamination, the probe and cabling were decontaminated
according to manufacturer’s recommendations between use in each well.
Gauging data were recorded on an electronic groundwater sampling form using a tablet device. Gauging procedures were performed in general accordance with NCDENR and NCDEQ Guidelines, and EPA Region 4 Operating Procedures.

Depth to water ranged from 20.66 feet BTOC (MW-02) to 22.40 feet BTOC (MW-03). LNAPL was not encountered during this monitoring event. Based on groundwater elevations calculated for this monitoring period, groundwater flow direction is towards the south.

Monitoring well gauging results for the November 2022 event are presented in Table 3. Groundwater elevations and flow direction are illustrated on Figure 4. Groundwater sampling forms with gauging data are provided in Appendix C.
6.3 SAMPLING DATA Following gauging, the monitoring wells were sampled in general accordance with NCDENR and NCDEQ guidelines and EPA Region 4 Operating
Procedures. Prior to obtaining representative groundwater samples, each monitoring well was purged by removing a minimum of three well volumes using a new, disposable bailer. Monitoring well groundwater field parameter data were measured at one-minute intervals using an In-Situ Aqua TROLL 600 Multiparameter Sonde (Aqua TROLL). Conductivity, pH, oxidation
reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen, and temperature measurements were recorded utilizing the VuSitu mobile application (version 1.17.12). The Aqua TROLL was decontaminated according to manufacturer’s recommendations and rinsed with distilled water between use at each monitoring well. Groundwater parameter data were transferred from the
VuSitu mobile application to the electronic groundwater sampling forms.
Copies of the groundwater sampling forms are available in Appendix C. After a minimum of three well volumes were removed (or the well was bailed dry), groundwater samples were collected from the wells and poured into
appropriate laboratory-provided, pre-preserved glassware, labeled, and placed on ice in an insulated cooler. A laboratory provided trip blank was maintained in the cooler for the duration of the sampling event. A field blank was collected by pouring water from a new, sealed gallon of
distilled water directly into laboratory-provided, pre-preserved glassware. The glassware was labeled and placed on ice in an insulated cooler. The groundwater samples, field blank, and laboratory provided trip blank were submitted to Con-Test Analytical Laboratory (Certification NC 652 and
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 9 December 2022
NC-DW 25703) in East Longmeadow, Massachusetts, under proper chain of custody (COC) protocol and analyzed per SM 6200B (including EDB, MTBE, and DIPE). The laboratory analytical data and COC are included in
Appendix E.
6.4 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER INFORMATION Historically, samples from former monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3 have
contained the highest petroleum constituent concentrations. During the
previous sampling event conducted by Shield (2018), samples from shallow wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and deep well T-1 contained VOCs at concentrations above the 2L GWQS. In the sample from MW-2, the concentrations of benzene, 1,2-DCA, and EDB also exceeded their
respective GCL. Summarized available historical sampling and gauging data
from previous consultants are provided in Appendix A. The latest groundwater sampling laboratory results for SM 6200B analysis are summarized in Table 4. Monitoring well sample summarized analytical
results are illustrated on Figure 5. A copy of the complete laboratory report
and COC documentation are in Appendix E.
Monitoring Wells
During the November 2022 sampling event, three monitoring well groundwater samples (MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03) were collected and submitted for analysis via SM 6200B (including EDB, MTBE, and DIPE). Laboratory analysis did not detect any constituents above their respective 2L GWQS in the sample from MW-02. Benzene and EDB were detected above
their respective GCL in the MW-01 sample. Analytical results reported the following constituents at concentrations above their 2L GWQS in samples MW-01 and MW-03:
• MW-01: benzene (GCL exceedance), n-butylbenzene, EDB (GCL
exceedance), ethylbenzene, isopropylbenzene, MTBE, naphthalene, n-propylbenzene, toluene, 1,2,4-trmethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, and total xylenes; and
• MW-03: benzene.

Trip Blank and Field Blank One laboratory provided trip blank and one field blank were submitted for analysis per SM 6200B (including EDB, MTBE, and DIPE). An estimated (“J”-
value) concentration of acetone (a common laboratory artifact) was detected in the field blank sample. A low concentration of chloroform was reported in the trip blank sample, but it was well below the 2L GWQS. No other targeted analytes were detected in the samples.
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 10 December 2022
6.5 EVALUATION OF ASSESSMENT INFORMATION Extent of Contamination

Several petroleum constituents were detected above their respective 2L GWQS in sample from MW-01 and benzene was above 2L GWQS in the MW-03 sample. Benzene and EDB were reported above GCL in the MW-01 sample. A summary of monitoring well groundwater sample analytical results
are illustrated on Figure 5. The contaminant plume is only horizontally
delineated to the south and has not been vertically delineated. Samples from the former deep well T-1 historically had multiple contaminants above 2L GWQS.
The highest contaminant concentrations have historically been reported in
samples from former monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3. Contaminant concentrations in the sample obtained from MW-01 (installed in the vicinity of former well MW-2) appear to be stable in relation to the concentrations previously reported (Shield, 2018).

Cleanup Levels Achieved
Soil – To date, approximately 139.69 tons of impacted soil have been removed from the site. Soil samples obtained in 2018 indicate that TPH GRO
concentrations are up to 1,942 mg/kg and TPH DRO up to 3,567 mg/kg (GRI,
2018).
Groundwater – Groundwater contaminant concentrations are above GCL at the site.

LNAPL – LNAPL was not measured during this monitoring period. LNAPL has not been historically detected at the site. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Conclusions Groundwater monitoring findings for this period are summarized below:
• Three shallow/Type II monitoring wells (MW-01, MW-02, and MW-03) were installed to 30 feet BLS.
• A groundwater sample was collected from each well and analyzed for VOCs per SM 6200B.
• Multiple contaminants were reported in the MW-01 sample above their 2L GWQS.
• Benzene and EDB were above their GCL in the MW-01 sample.
• In the MW-03 sample, only benzene was reported above its 2L GWQS.
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 11 December 2022
•No targeted analytes were above 2L GWQS in the MW-02 sample.
•Groundwater flow direction was calculated towards the south during thismonitoring period.
Recommendations
CATLIN recommends installing additional monitoring wells in an attempt to delineate the horizontal and vertical extent of GCL impacted groundwater and determine vertical gradient. It is also recommended to sample the three active water supply wells within 1,000 feet of the site.
8.0 STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATION
1 Enter the date the monitoring report was due. December 23, 2022 Will this report be submitted after the established due date? NO
2 Was any required information from the above template missing from this report? YES
No cross sections are provided. Historical cross sections from Shield (2002) are
included in Appendix A.
3 If applicable, will any of the proposed attenuation milestones under the schedule approved in the Corrective Action Plan not be met? NA
A CAP was submitted for the site in 2002. However, it was not available in Laserfiche files for review.
4 Does any known or suspected source zone soil contamination or free product remain outside of the assessed area that could be inhibiting natural attenuation? NO
5 Has there been an unexpected increase in contaminant mass sufficient to suggest a potential new release from a separate onsite or offsite source? NO
6 Certification:
I, Benjamin J. Ashba, a Licensed Geologist for CATLIN Engineers and Scientists, do certify that the information contained in this report is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists is licensed to practice geology in North Carolina. The certification number of the company or corporation is C-118.
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 12 December 2022
9.0 LIMITATIONS
The groundwater samples analyzed as part of this investigation only provide isolated
data points and may not represent conditions at every location in the project area.
Analyses and conclusions of this report, being based on interpolation between data points at the project area, may not be completely representative of all site conditions. Conclusions and recommendations of this investigation and report are based on the best available data in an effort to comply with current regulatory
requirements.
10.0 REFERENCES
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists, Receptor Survey Letter Report, Former Texaco
Food Mart #2, 1700 Cotton Grove Road, Lexington, North Carolina 27292,
Incident Number: 22332, Risk Classification: H157D, CATLIN Project No.
221185, September 23, 2021.
Geological Resources, Inc., UST Closure Report, October 2018, Texaco Food Mart, 1700 Cotton Grove Road, Lexington, Davidson County, North Carolina,
Incident Number: 22332, Facility ID no.: 0-011600, GRI Project No: 4811,
November 15, 2018.
NCDENR, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management, Guidelines for Sampling, December 1, 2013.
NCDENR, Groundwater Section, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management, Pollution Incident/U.S.T.
Leak Reporting Form, August 24, 2000.
NCDENR, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management, Database, Waste Management,
UST Facilities, Tank Information and Affiliates, Accessed July 16, 2020.
NCDEQ, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management, Corrective Action Guidelines, January 19, 2021(A).
NCDEQ, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality,
Corrective Action Branch, Subject: Recommendation for State Lead Cleanup
– Former Texaco Food Mart #2, February 10, 2021(B).
NCDEQ, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management, Memo, Incident No.: 22332, Former Texaco Food Mart #2, 1700 Cotton Grove Road, Lexington, Davidson County,
Incident #22332, Risk/Rank/Land Use Classification: High/157/Industrial/
Commercial, Request for State Lead, July 24, 2020.
NCDEQ, UST Section, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste Management, UST-2A Form, Site Investigation Report for Permanent Closure or Change-in-Service of Registered UST, October 18,
2018.
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 13 December 2022
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development,
Geological Map of North Carolina, 1985.
Ogden Environmental and Engineering Services Co., Inc., Preliminary Site
Assessment Report, Texaco Food Mart #3, Parcel #75, 1700 Cotton Grove
Road (NC 8), Lexington, North Carolina, April 8, 1999.
Shield Engineering, Inc., Comprehensive Site Assessment, Texaco Food Mart #2 or
Redwines Food Mart, 1700 Cotton Grove Road (NC Highway 8), Davidson County, North Carolina, Groundwater Incident No. 22332, Shield Project No.
1001289, May 2002, May 1, 2002.
Shield Engineers, Inc., CSA Addendum, Texaco Food Mart #2, 1700 Cotton Grove
Road, Lexington, Davidson County, NC, NCDENR Incident#:22332, Shield
Project No. 1001289, October 20, 2010.
Shield Engineering, Inc., Monitoring Report, Texaco Food Mart #2, 1700 Cotton
Grove Road, Lexington, Davidson County, North Carolina, Incident No.
22332, Shield Project No. 1001289, August 13, 2018.
Stoner, David, Personal Communication, Subject: [External] Techno, LLC
Dissolution and Sites Transfer, January 24, 2019.
U.S. EPA, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science and
Ecosystem Support Division, Athens Georgia, Operating Procedure – Field
Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination at the FEC, Striggow, B., U.S. EPA Report No. SESDPROC-206-R3, Effective Date December 18, 2015.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science and Ecosystem Support Division, Athens Georgia, Operating Procedure – Groundwater Level and Well Depth
Measurement, Striggow, B., U.S. EPA Report No. SESDPROC-105-R3,
Effective Date November 3, 2016.
U.S. EPA, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science and Ecosystem Support Division, Athens Georgia, Operating Procedure – Groundwater Sampling, Striggow, B., U.S. EPA Report No. SESDPROC-
301-R4, Effective Date April 26, 2017.
U.S. EPA, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science and Ecosystem Support Division, Athens Georgia, Operating Procedure – In Situ
Water Quality Monitoring, Chief, Field Services Branch, U.S. EPA Report No. SESDPROC-111-R4, Effective Date March 14, 2018.

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022

TABLES
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 1
SITE HISTORY - UST AND OTHER RELEASE INFORMATION
Incident Name and No.: Former Texaco Food Mart #2 - 22332
UST ID
Number
Name of Owner/
Operator
Last
Contents
Previous
Contents
Capacity
(gal)
Construction
Details
Tank
Dimensions
(feet)
Installation
Date
(mm/dd/yy)
Date
Removed
(mm/dd/yy)
1 Gasoline Gasoline 8,000 Fiberglass
Clad Steel 8 x 21.3 04/15/84 10/15/18
2 Gasoline Gasoline 8,000 Fiberglass
Clad Steel 8 x 21.3 04/15/84 10/15/18
3A Gasoline Gasoline 4,000 Steel 5.3 x 24 05/31/89 10/15/18
4A Gasoline Gasoline 4,000 Steel 5.3 x 24 05/31/89 10/15/18
5 Kerosene Gasoline 1,000 Steel 4 x 10.5 04/15/84 10/16/18
6 Diesel Gasoline 4,000 Fiberglass
Clad Steel 5.3 x 24 07/01/98 10/15/18
Incident
Number
Material
Released
Date Release
Discovered
(mm/dd/yy)
22332 Gasoline 02/08/99
Information obtained from UST Closure Report by GRI (2018), UST Leak Reporting Form dated 08/24/00, UST-2A Permanent Closure Report dated 10/18/18, and the NCDWM UST database accessed 07/16/20.
Description of the Release
Soil and groundwater contamination were discovered during preliminary
site assessment activities on February 8, 1999.
Holding Bros, Inc.
(dissolved) / Amy
Redwine
&
United Oil of the
Carolinas, Inc. /
Dave Dulmage
Dates of
Ownership/
Operation
Holding Bros, Inc.:
Installation - 01/13/03
United Oil of the
Carolinas, Inc.:
01/13/03 - 10/16/18
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2; T1_Site History
CATLIN Project No. 221185
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
December 2022
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 2
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELLS AND OTHER RECEPTOR INFORMATION
Incident Name and No.: Former Texaco Food Mart #2 - 22332
Well ID Property Address
Real Estate
Identification
Number (REID)
Owner Name
(Last, First MI.)
Owner Mailing
Address Well Use
Distance /
Direction from
Source Area
(feet)
Comment
WSW-1 1710 Cotton
Grove Rd.6723-02-69-6905 Lopp, Bruce W. P.O. Box 284
Lexington, NC 27293
Potable,
Active 550 / SSE Potable well confirmed by resident.
WSW-2 104 Fuller St.6724-04-60-9244 Baker, Paul & Stella 104 Fuller St.
Lexington, NC 27292 Not in use*610 / SE
Receptor questionaire returned to sender
as undeliverable. Assumed non-potable
and inactive based on previous receptor
survey.
WSW-3 106 Fuller St.6724-04-70-0620 Fuller, Margaret 106 Fuller St.
Lexington, NC 27292 Not in use*640 / NE
Receptor questionaire not returned,
active Davidson Water account.
Assumed non-potable and inactive
based on previous receptor survey.
WSW-4 115 Cedar Lane
Dr.
6724-04-50-
4349 Martin, David & Martha 1648 Arrington Dr.
Lexington, NC 27295
Potable,
Active 980 / WSW Potable well confirmed by resident.
WSW-5 6 Mayfair Rd.6723-02-69-6747 E.E. Wilson Investments,
LLC
P.O. Box 2014
Lexington, NC 27293
Non-potable,
Inactive 705 / SSE Public water use confirmed by resident,
active Davidson Water account.
WSW-6 8 Mayfair Rd.6723-02-69-7747 Bee, Bethany D.196 Woodwind Dr.
Lexington, NC 27295
Non-potable,
Inactive 725 / SSE Public water use confirmed by resident.
Well on-site not in use.
WSW-7 100 Mayfair Rd. 6723-02-69-8779 Davis, Deborah G.100 Mayfair Rd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Non-potable,
Inactive 720 / SE Public water use confirmed by resident;
non-potable well.
WSW-8 108 Mayfair Rd.6723-02-79-1871 D.L. Hoffman, LLC 711 Overbrook Dr.
High Point, NC 27262 Potable, Active 950 / SE Potable well use confirmed by resident.
WSW-9 130 Fuller St.6724-04-70-3350 E. Lexington Congregation
of Jehovah's Witness
c/o Paul Carder
208 Maxwell Dr.
Lexington, NC 27295
Non-potable,
Inactive 1,025 / ESE Well is capped and covered with rocks;
not in use per owner.
WSW-10 103 Mayfair Rd.6723-02-79-0509 Bordonaro, Matthew and
Elizabeth
103 Mayfair Rd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Potable,
Active 1,040 / SE
Well used for drinking and irrigation per
owner response. Owner indicated well
depth is 100 feet.
WSW-11 102 Mayfair Rd.6723-02-69-9779 Krueger, Hermann and
Maria
102 Mayfair Rd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Non-potable,
Inactive 855 / SE
Public water use confirmed by resident
and active Davidson Water account.
Well on-site not in use.
WSW-12 104 Mayfair Rd. 6723-02-79-
0789 Tetter, John and Joyce 104 Mayfair Rd.
Lexington, NC 27292
Non-potable,
Inactive 905 / SE
Public water use confirmed by resident
and active Davidson Water account.
Well on-site not in use.
Water supply well location and details are based on observations and information collected during a field survey conducted on August 10, 2021.
* = Information obtained from prior receptor survey reported by ARM, 2014.
Property data was obtained from the Davidson County GIS data viewer, accessed September 2021.
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2; T2_Receptor Info
CATLIN Project No. 221185
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
December 2022
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 3
Incident Name and No.: Former Texaco Food Mart #2 - 22332
Well ID
Date
Installed
(mm/dd/yy)
Date Water
Level
Measured
(mm/dd/yy)
Well
Diameter
(inches)
Well
Casing
Depth
(ft. BLS)*
Screened
Interval
(x to y ft.
BLS)
Bottom
of Well
(ft. BLS)
Top of
Casing
Elevation*
(ft.)
Depth to
Water from
Top of Casing
(ft.)
Free-Phase
Product
Thickness**
(ft.)
Ground
Water
Elevation
(ft.)
MW-01 11/15/22 11/25/22 2.0 15.0 15.0-30.0 30.0 99.24 21.49 NMT 77.75
MW-02 11/15/22 11/25/22 2.0 15.0 15.0-30.0 30.0 98.18 20.66 NMT 77.52
MW-03 11/15/22 11/25/22 2.0 15.0 15.0-30.0 30.0 100.00 22.40 NMT 77.60
NMT = No Measureable Thickness
ft. BLS = feet Below Land Surface
WELL CONSTRUCTION AND WATER LEVEL GAUGING DATA - NOVEMBER 25, 2022
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2; T3_Well Con & Gauging
CATLIN Project No. 221185
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
December 2022
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS - STANDARD METHOD 6200B
Incident Name and No.: Former Texaco Food Mart #2 - 22332
Date
Collected
11/25/22 <1,000 9,600 85 J <55 <84 ƚ 400 <64 5,800 260 <49 ƚ 900 930 580 50,000 4,300 1,000 30,000 BMDL
11/25/22 <2.0 0.53 <0.15 <0.11 <0.17 <0.17 ƚ 7.3 L <0.21 <0.11 <0.097 1.8 <0.24 <0.086 <0.22 <0.20 <0.11 <0.69 BMDL
11/25/22 <2.0 1.3 2.8 0.70 2.2 <0.17 ƚ 0.28 J,L 0.56 0.53 0.59 <0.17 1.5 0.21 J 2.0 8.8 <0.11 5.6 BMDL
11/25/22 5.9 J <0.20 <0.15 <0.11 <0.17 <0.17 ƚ <0.13 <0.21 <0.11 <0.097 <0.17 <0.24 <0.086 <0.22 <0.20 <0.11 <0.69 BMDL
11/25/22 <2.0 <0.20 <0.15 <0.11 0.88 <0.17 ƚ <0.13 <0.21 <0.11 <0.097 <0.17 <0.24 <0.086 <0.22 <0.20 <0.11 <0.69 BMDL
All results in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
BMDL = Below Method Detection Limit
Bold results indicate concentrations above 2L GWQS.
Shaded results indicate concentrations above GCL.
GCL = Gross Contaminant Level
2L GWQS = NCAC T15A:02L Groundwater Quality Standards
< = Less than method detection limit
ƚ = The method detection limit is above the 2L GWQS.
J = Detected but below the Reporting Limit (lowest calibration standard); result is an estimated concentration (CLP J-Flag).
L = Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery and/or duplicate recovery are outside of control limits. Reported value for this compound is likely to be biased on the high
side (L-06 Flag).
Field
Blank Naphthalene n-PropylbenzeneToluene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)EthylbenzeneIsopropylbenzene (Cumene)p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)Contaminant of
Concern
AcetoneBenzenen-Butylbenzenesec-ButylbenzeneAll Other SM 6200B AnalytesWell/
Sample
ID
MW-01
MW-02
MW-03 1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneTotal XylenesChloroform 11,700
25
Trip
Blank
GCL (µg/L)
2L GWQS (µg/L)
6,000,000
6,000
5,000
1
5,900
70
8,800
70
70,000
70
50
0.02
70,000
70
80,000
600
30,500
70
50,000
500
Varies
Varies
20,000
20
6,000
6
26,100
70
260,000
600
28,500
400
24,100
400
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2; T4_GW Results
CATLIN Project No. 221185
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
December 2022

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022

FIGURES
SITE LOCATION
COTTON GROVE RDINTERSTATE 85
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
1FORMER TEXACOFOODMART #21700 COTTON GROVE RDLEXINGTON, NC
SITE VICINITY MAP
2,000 0 2,000 4,0001,000
Feet
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY22332221185DEC 2022 AS SHOWN KMC/BJA
³
!(W!(W
!(W
!(W
!(W
!(P
!(P
!(P
!(W
!(W !(W
!(P
SITE LOCATION
1 ,0 0 0 F EET RADIUS
COTTON GROVE RDIN T E R S T A T E 8 5
WSW-4
WSW-3
WSW-1
WSW-2
WSW-8WSW-5
WSW-6
WSW-7
WSW-9250FEETRADI
U
S1 ,5 0 0 F EET RADIUS
WSW-11 WSW-12
WSW-10
Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User Community
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
2FORMER TEXACOFOODMART #21700 COTTON GROVE RDLEXINGTON, NC
POTENTIAL RECEPTOR MAP
500 0 500 1,000250
Feet
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY22332221185DEC 2022 AS SHOWN KMC/BJA
NOTE: Well locations were obtained from previous reports prepared by other consultants and are approximate.
LEGEND
!(P Active Potable
Water Supply Well
!(W Inactive Non-Potable
Water Supply Well
³
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!?
!?
!?")>")>
!>
!?
!?
!?
!?!(>
!(>
!(>!?!(>
!H
")<!H
")<!H
")<")<!H")<!H")<")<!H
!(
!(!(
!(
!>
!>
!>COTTON GROVE RDMW-5
MW-4
TEMP-1
TEMP-2MW-1
TW-1
MW-2
MW-6
MW-3
AS-6 VE-7 T-4
VE-6
AS-5
AS-2
MW-1
VE-2
VE-4AS-4
VE-1T-3VE-5MW-2
T-1AS-1
VE-3
AS-3
T-2
FORMERDIESEL UST
FORMERDISPENSER ISLANDS
FORMERGASOLINEUSTS
FORMERSUPREME USTS
FORMERREGULARUSTS
FORMERDIESELUST
FORMERDIESELDISPENSER
FORMERGASOLINEDISPENSER
FORMERGASOLINEDISPENSER
FORMERKEROSENEDISPENSER
FORMERKEROSENEUST
MW-01
MW-03
MW-02
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911 Board
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
3AFORMER TEXACOFOODMART #21700 COTTON GROVE RDLEXINGTON, NC
SITE MAP
40 0 40 8020
Feet
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY22332221185DEC 2022 AS SHOWN KMC/BJA
Abandoned Monitoring
Well (Type II)!>
LEGEND
Approximate Location
of Former UST Systems
Parcel Boundary
³
NOTE: Well and tank locations were obtained from previous reports prepared by other consultants and are approximate.
Temporary MonitoringWell (Type II))!>
Destroyed Monitoring Well (Deep)!(>
Air Sparge!H
Vapor Extraction")<Destroyed Monitoring Well (Type II)!>Active Monitoring
Well (Type II)!>
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!?
!?
!?
!>
!?
!?
!?
!?!(>
!(>
!(>!?!(>
!H
")<!H
")<!H
")<")<!H")<!H")<")<!H
!(
!(!(
!(
!>
!>
!>COTTON GROVE RDMW-5
MW-4
MW-6
MW-3
AS-6
VE-7 T-4
VE-6
AS-5
AS-2
MW-1
VE-2
VE-4AS-4
VE-1T-3VE-5MW-2
T-1AS-1
VE-3
AS-3
T-2
FORMERREGULARUSTS
FORMERDIESELUST
FORMERDIESELDISPENSER
FORMERGASOLINEDISPENSER
FORMERGASOLINEDISPENSER
FORMERKEROSENEDISPENSER
FORMERKEROSENEUST
MW-01
MW-03
MW-02
FORMERSUPREME USTS
APPROXIMATE LOCATIONOF CUTTINGS PLACED BY CATLIN ON 2022/11/15
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911Board
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
3BFORMER TEXACOFOODMART #21700 COTTON GROVE RDLEXINGTON, NC
SITE MAP
40 0 40 8020
Feet
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY22332221185DEC 2022 AS SHOWN KMC/BJA
NOTE: Well and tank locations were obtained from previous reports prepared by other consultants and are approximate.
³
Abandoned Monitoring Well (Type II)!>
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Former UST Systems
Parcel Boundary
Destroyed Monitoring Well (Deep)!(>
Air Sparge!H
Vapor Extraction")<Destroyed Monitoring
Well (Type II)!>Active Monitoring Well (Type II)!>
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!>
!>
!><<<MW-01(77.75)
MW-03(77.60)
MW-02(77.52)COTTON GROVE RD77.6077.6577.5577.70NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911Board
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
4FORMER TEXACOFOODMART #21700 COTTON GROVE RDLEXINGTON, NC
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION –NOVEMBER 25, 2022
20 0 20 4010
Feet
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY22332221185DEC 2022 AS SHOWN KMC/BJA
³
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Former UST Systems
Parcel Boundary
Gauged Monitoring Well (Type II)!>
NOTES: 1. Tank locations were obtained from previous reports prepared by other consultants and are approximate.2. The groundwater elevation contour interval is 0.05 feet.
Groundwater FlowDirection
Groundwater Contour<Groundwater Elevation (Feet)(##)
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!>
!>
!>
MW-01
MW-03
MW-02COTT
ON GROVE RD?????
ESTIMATED HORIZONTALEXTENT OF 2L GWQSEXCEEDANCES
NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911Board
FIGUREPROJECTTITLE
5FORMER TEXACOFOODMART #21700 COTTON GROVE RDLEXINGTON, NC
MONITORING WELLGROUNDWATER SAMPLEANALYTICAL RESULTS –NOVEMBER 25, 2022
20 0 20 4010
Feet
INCIDENT NO.JOB NO.DATE SCALE DRAWN BY/CHECKED BY22332221185DEC 2022 AS SHOWN KMC/BJA
NOTE: Tank locations were obtained from previous reports prepared by other consultants and are approximate.
³
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Former UST Systems
Parcel Boundary
Sampled Monitoring Well (Type II)!>
Incident Name and No.: Former Texaco Food Mart #2 - 22332
DateCollected
11/25/22 9,600 85 J 400 5,800 260 900 930 580 50,000 4,300 1,000 30,000 B2L11/25/22 0.53 <0.15 <0.17 ƚ <0.21 <0.11 1.8 <0.24 <0.086 <0.22 <0.20 <0.11 <0.69 B2L11/25/22 1.3 2.8 <0.17 ƚ 0.56 0.53 <0.17 1.5 0.21 J 2.0 8.8 <0.11 5.6 B2L
All results in micrograms per liter (µg/L).Bold results are above 2L GWQS. Refer to Table 4 for all other notes. B2L = Below 2L GWQS Shaded results are above GCL.
5,90070 500.02 80,000600 30,50070 20,000 20 6,0006 26,10070 28,500400 50,000500 VariesVaries260,000600 24,100400
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS - STANDARD METHOD 6200B
Contaminant of Concern
Benzene Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneTotal XylenesAll Other SM 6200B AnalytesSampleID
n-Butylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)EthylbenzeneIsopropylbenzene (Cumene)Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)TolueneMW-01
MW-02
MW-03 GCL (µg/L)2L GWQS (µg/L) 5,0001

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022

APPENDICES

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022

APPENDIX A HISTORICAL DATA
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL DATA — Shield, 2002
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Project No. 221185 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists December 2022
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL DATA — Shield, 2002
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Project No. 221185 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists December 2022
APPENDIX A
HISTORICAL DATA — Geological Resources, 2018
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Project No. 221185 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists December 2022
Date: 10/17/18 Facility ID #: 0-011600
→
50 100
UST-1-1 (9')10/16/18 9 0.54 0.41
UST-1-2 (9') 10/16/18 9 1.5 0.2
UST-1-3 (9') 10/16/18 9 0.99 4.4
UST-2-1 (9') 10/16/18 9 <0.54 0.86
UST-2-2 (9') 10/16/18 9 0.65 0.58
UST-2-3 (9') 10/16/18 9 0.41 0.24
UST-3-1 (12') 10/16/18 12 0.69 0.6
UST-3-2 (12') 10/16/18 12 1.5 1
UST-3-3 (12') 10/16/18 12 <0.35 0.35
UST-4-1 (12') 10/16/18 12 0.42 0.39
UST-4-2 (12') 10/16/18 12 <0.32 0.32
UST-4-3 (12') 10/16/18 12 <0.47 <0.47
UST-5-1 (9') 10/16/18 9 <0.59 <0.59
UST-5-2 (9') 10/16/18 9 <0.53 <0.53
UST-5-3 (9') 10/16/18 9 <0.4 0.4
UST-6-1 (7') 10/16/18 7 1,942 3,567
UST-6-2 (7') 10/16/18 7 <0.3 0.3
UST-6-3 (8') 10/16/18 8 <0.56 <0.56
DI-1 (3') 10/16/18 3 91.1 98.6
DI-2 (3') 10/16/18 3 <0.32 <0.32
DI-3 (3') 10/16/18 3 276.2 52.7
DI-4 (3') 10/16/18 3 <2.8 0.28
PP-1 (3') 10/16/18 3 <0.19 <0.19
PP-2 (3') 10/16/18 3 <0.21 2.9
PP-3 (3') 10/16/18 3 <0.62 <0.62
• Results reported in mg/kg (milligrams per kilogram).
• Samples analyzed on site by RedLab Rapic Environmental Diagnostics (REDLAB).
• ft-BGS: feet below ground surface.
• RAL: Regulatory Action Level.
• Concentrations in bold type face exceeded the RALs.
PRODUCT
PIPING
RAL (mg/kg)
DISPENSER
ISLANDS
UST BASIN #1
UST BASIN #2 Diesel-Range TPHTABLE 3
SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TEXACO FOOD MART (INCIDENT NO. 22332)
Analytical Method REDLAB QED-UVF
Sample IDDate Analyzed (mm/dd/yy)Sample LocationSample Depth(ft-BGS)Gasoline-Range TPHAPPENDIX A
HISTORICAL DATA — Geological Resources, 2018
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Project No. 221185 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists December 2022
('
=o
c;
€
d
a
o€Noo
Udl(,
L
N
=LF
o6N
oo
oooN
FUU
do-
I s H I E L D 3?,xi'a"ffrfisis*-
ENGINEERING, INC.M.shiel&nginsdry_ffi
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
CONTOUR MAP
TEXACO FOOD MART #2
17OO COTTON GROVE ROAD
LEXINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
SH|ELD # 1001289
DATE: 8/2/18 DRAWN BY: MTS
DIESEL UST
.ON'RfrF PAD
tr,tW-O 0
(NM)
VACANT Lfi
!DISPENSER DISPENSER Iorsnrrsrn
DI5PENSER
^S"ffi DTSPENSER orsrrrurr*!I orsrrHsen
^S"lbrlr&44N,o
odU
od.(,zo
Eo\,
@
UFDod.
Uz.
#O rt,tw-z#(NM)
TW.1 o
GASOLINE UST
h
zo
GASOLJNE UST
GASOLINE UsT
(NM)
^-{$ko:b!-,&14N,(D rcnp.z
(NM)
o
(NM}
^S.i5iKrdN(
^Srffi
CEDAR LANE ROAD O rer,lp-r
(NM)
LEGEND:
+g LIGHT POtE
POWER POLE
ELECTRICAL LINE
SANITARY SEWER LINE
PRODUCT LINE
TB(ACO FOOD MART MONITORING WELL
WENDYS PROPERTY
MW.5o
O TEXACO FOOD MART DEEP MONITORING WELL
o AMOCO RUsHCO f3 MONITORING WELLALL DATA TAKEN FROM THE PHASE II LIMITED SITE ASSESSMENTREPOET PREPARED BY CBM ENVIROI'4ENTAL SERVICES, INC.DATED 4t16t01.
VAPOR EXTMCTION WELLovE
AIR SPARGING WELLxAs(fr) FEET
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR LINE (ft)
-
GENERALIZED GROUNDWATER FLow DIRECTION
(81.12) GROUNDWATERELEVATTON(fr)
[81.33] GROUNDWATER ELEVATTON (fr) NOT U5E0 rN CONTOURTNG
(NM) NOT MEASURED
APPROXIMATE GRAPHIC SCALE
0 't5 l0IEEJ--I
AMOCO
RUSHCO #3
bf
ro
I
I
I
I
I
ASI#SIT
AS-5
Eve-zovE-6
rlidr
xO
SUPREI'IEUST
REGULAR
UST
l- :mEirF--tr!H
REGULARufi
I
TANK PIT
r.2
/
ASPHALT
$d/
$o
+
XEROSENE
/
I
I
121
1 (NM)6
oro
c;6
Io Mw4
(80.59)
NOTES:1 DEPTHS TO GROUNDWATER MEAsUREO 6/19/18.2 ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIT\AATE.3 CONTOUR INTERVALS = O.2O FOOT
PARKING AREA
scALE: 1 in- = l0 fr-SCALE: AS SHOWN FIGURE : 4
APPENDIX A
HISTORICAL DATA — SHIELD, 2018
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Project No. 221185 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists December 2022
Table 2:
Summary of Well Construction and Historical Groundrvater Elevation Data
Texaco Food Mart#2
1700 Cotton Grove Road, Lexington, North Carolina
NCDENR Incid ent # 22332
WcII ID Date
lnstalled
Top of
Casing
Elevation
(feet)
Well
Diameter
(inches)
As-built
Depth
(fect)
Screened
Interval (feet)
Field Measurements Field Calculations
Gauging Date
Total
Depth
(feet)
Depth to
Static
Water
(feet)
Depth to
Free
Product
(feet)
Diff. Betrveen
As-Built and
Measured Total
Depth (feet)
Ground-water
Elevation
(feet)
MW-t 07 / 3t t0t 100.00 2 35 20-35 t0/t 0/01 35.00 24.09 NA 0 7 5.91
r4t22/02 3s.00 22.13 NA 0 'I t.Et
tut9to't 35.01 23.69 NA -(.).0 I 76.1t
u3t04t09 34.93 19.68 NA o.ol 80.32
wt19/13 35.07 t7.55 NA -0.07 82.4s
u7nln4 35.0./ I L32 NA -(.1.07 E2.66
05t20^5 15.{t7 I 8.60 NA -0.07 8l.40
03t21t16 35.07 16.48 NA -0.07 83.52
$t1{v17 3s.07 20.08 NA -0.07 t9.92
tlt16n7 35.07 22.6t NA -0.07 77 ..t9
06/l 9/18 35.07 l 8.88 NA -o.07 8t.t2
MW-2 07/3t/0t luu.l9 2 J)2U-35 r ui r u/ut J5,UU '24.22 NA U 't5. tE
04tzztuz -15_00 22.08 NA 0 17.92
tr/t9t[7 34.75 23.84 NA 0.25 16.35
03/04t09 34.65 19.62 NA 0.35 80.57
t)6tzan2 34.9 t I E.4E NA u.09 E I,7I
07n9n3 '14.94 17.53 NA 0.06 82.66
07nl/14 34.94 t7.28 NA 0.06 82.91
05/20/15 34.94 18.65 NA 0.06 81.54
u3/21fi6 34.t)4 I 6.61 NA 0.06 ti-J.5u
05n0t17 34.94 20.26 NA 0.06 79.93
tl/16t17 34.94 22.95 NA 0.06 77.24
06/19n8 34.94 19.04 NA 0.u6 E l.l5
MW-3 I o/oxiu I l0u.l9 2 :15 20-35 I 0/l 0/01 35.00 24.27 NA 0 75.92
04t22t02 35.00 2t.93 NA 0 18.26
t1n9/07 J5.UJ 24.t0 NA -0.0J '16-0r)
u3t04t09 '34.96 19..J5 NA 0_04 ti0.lJ4
07n9n3 35.08 t1.23 NA -0.08 82.96
07nln4 35.08 17.05 NA -0.08 83.1 4
u5r2wl5 J5.OE I E.4E NA -0.0E 61.71
tJ3tzl^6 15.0t{t6.ll NA -0.08 83.88
05/l 0/l 6 35.08 20.t0 NA -0.08 80.09
tln6n7 3 5.08 23.09 NA -0.08 I I .ItJ
u6/l 9/l E 35.0u I E.96 NA -0.0u 8l.21
MW-4 I 0/()t{^) I 99.40 2 35 20-35 10/10/01 35.00 24.11 NA U /6.UU
04122102 J5.OU 2t.9 t NA 0 'tE.2E
lUt9/Lt1 :t4.lJ I 2l.lJli NA 0. l9 7 5.52
03/04iltg 34.74 19.90 NA 0.26 79.50
07/20t10 34.72 18.57 NA 0.28 EU.EJ
07^9n-t '34.91J t].90 NA 0_ I0 u l .5()
ll7 t11/l4 34.90 11.60 NA 0.10 81.80
05t20/t5 34.90 I 8.66 NA 0.l0 80.74
03tzt/16 34.9tJ I6.JE NA u. l0 E3.02
0il10/L7 14.9t)7{1.02 NA 0. l0 19.38
ll/l6t17 34.90 22.86 NA 0. l0 '7 6.54
06/19n8 34.90 r8.8r NA 0. tu EU.59
MW-5 04t04/02 I (X).1 9 2 35 20-15 04tzzt0z 35.00 23.34 NA 0 76.85
t1n9/07 35.07 24.76 NA -0.07 75.63
03t04/09 J5.09 2t.n NA -0.09 19.22
07 /t9^3 :\5.12 t9.02 NA -0.12 81 .37
07nln4 35.12 I 8.78 NA -0.12 8l .61
05t20ns 35.t2 r9.90 NA -{J.12 E0.49
ti3tzUl6 J5.12 t7.19 NA -0.'t2 t{2.60
05ntvl7 35.12 21.05 NA -0.12 79.34
11n6/17 35.12 23.01 NA -0.12 77.38
06n9/18 35.12 19.09 NA -tJ.I 2 EI,JO
Sum of well conslruclion and histoical groundwater elevation
APPENDIX A
HISTORICAL DATA — SHIELD, 2018
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Project No. 221185 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists December 2022
Summary of Well Construction and Historical Groundrvater Elevation Data
Texaco Food Mart #2
1700 Cotton Grove Road, Lexington, North Carolina
NCDENR Incident# 22332
Field Measurements Field Calculations
Well ID Date
Installed
Top of
Casing
Elevation
(feet)
Well
Diameter
(inches)
As-built
Depth
(feet)
Screened
Interval (feet)Gauging Date
Total
Depth
(feet)
Depth to
Static
Water
(feet)
Depth to
Free
Product
(feet)
Diff. Between
As-Built and
Measured Total
Depth (feet)
Ground-water
Elevation
(feet)
04/22t02 25.00 23.02 NA 0 77 .17
tt/19/07 25.00 NM NA 0 NM
tJ3/U4t09 NM NM NM NM NM
MW-6 04/04/02 tol.42 2 25 t5-25
IO/lU/t l 9U.UU t4.93 NA U t5.26
u4tzztuz 90.u(,'22.O6 NA U 7E.t3
tln9/(17 86.71 2t.5t)NA 3.29 78.76
03/04t09 65.82 19.52 NA 24.t8 80.83
07/19/13 66.84 1 8.14 NA 2J.T6 62.2t
07ilUt4 66.E4 I E.5ti NA 2t.16 lit.77
tJst20n5 66.84 I9.36 NA 23.16 80.99
03t21/16 66.84 17.08 NA 23.16 83.27
u5iLon7 66.E4 '20.oJ NA 23.t6 60.32
lt/t6n7 66.u4 2',.\.51 NA 23.t6 76,84
06/19n8 66.84 t9.02 NA 23.t6 8l.33
T-1 10/09tol 100.35 2 90 85.5-90
l. NM:NotMeasured
2. NA: Not Applicable
Pnga 2 of2Sum of well conslruction and historical groundwaler elevation
APPENDIX A
HISTORICAL DATA — SHIELD, 2018
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Project No. 221185 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists December 2022
Table 4:
Summary of Historical Analytical Results-Gloundwater Samples
Texaco Food Mart #2
1700 Cotton Grove Road, Lcxington, North Carolina
NCDENR Incident #
Atralytical Method--->EPA Method 601/602
EPA
Method
504,1 or
62008
EPA
Method
625 or
6200B
MADEP
VPH
MADEP VPH &
EPH
MADEF
EPH
MADEP VPH &
EPH
F
ts]
x
F
E]
F]
.l
z
ri
!z
d
()
il
(J
U
o
il
I
a
q
()
d.o
:
il
d
Q
5
il
o
(J
l5A NCAC 2L.0202
Standard--->I 600 600 500 0.4 70 20 0.02 6 400 700 10,000 200
l5A NCAC 2L.01 15
Gross Contnmination 5,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 400 70,000 20,000 50 6,000
roll,rs/J,tsll, rslL ralL lplL nplL tplL npll,'1,
MW-l 07l3v0t ND 53 340 1,300 ND NR NR 0.96 15 ND 3,410 ND 2,780
o4l30l03 t2 340 l3 1,470 ND ND NR NR 210 NR NR NR NR
1vt9t0'1 49.5 64.7 r79 1,210 ND ND ND ND r07 ND 665 ND 825
03t04/09 53.7 28.4 165 827 ND ND ND ND 161 468 6,170 NI)2,200
07119113 69,4 87.4 t2t 761 ND ND 7.4 ND ll4 NR NR NR NR
o7/tut4 77,2 t0l t32 190 ND ND ND ilt NR NR NR NR
0sl20lts 93.2 ll3 145 816 ND 5.2 0.63 t43 NR NR NR NR
031211t6 a2.7 '12.9 ll9 658 ND 4.4 ND 99,3 NR NR NR NR
05n0/17 126 lt9 164 899 3,6 ND 3.6 ND 120 NR NR NR NR
tllt6lt'l 168 t82 195 1,03?ND ND 4 ND t38 NR NR NR NR
06lt9ll8 86.6 76.3 |7 682 ND 4.2 ND 99,3 NR NR NR NR
MW-2 0713v0t 13,000 38,000 3,600 16,000 1,200 NR NR 720 NR 81,000 28,000 NR 9,100
04130103 12,000 29,000 2,800 16,700 1,700 ND NR ND 1,400 NR NR NR NR
tt/ t9/07 14,900 34,200 3,090 18,400 1,1 50 ND 6,090 ND t,090 60,100 71,600 308 26,630
03t04109 I 1,700 27,200 2,250 r4,500 ND ND 3,600 ND 238 59,300 58,930 ND 8,340
06t28t12 8,930 17,800 t,160 10,9s0 1,090 144 1,420 635 974 NR NR NR NR
0'rlr9t13 12,600 24,300 2,200 13,380 1,330 194 7,550 773 1,260 NR NR NR NR
o7111114 10,800 21,300 1,910 11,980 1,210 142 7,040 663 1,070 NR NR NR NR
05120/15 6,41 0 12,600 989 6,460 713 90,9 4,830 451 898 NR NR NR NR
03/2u16 I I,3oo 22,700 2,170 13,200 1,090 154 6,240 677 I,t00 NR NR NR NR
05/t0lt7 13,600 29,200 2,770 16,210 1,330 l8t 6,620 706 l,180 NR NR NR NR
tu16ll'1 I I,ooo 24,t00 2,410 14,760 910 163 5,320 621 t,080 NR NR NR NR
06/19/r8 9,780 23,800 2,370 t4,680 885 l3l J,810 565 I,0r 0 NR NR NR NR
MW-3 l0i l0/01 120 4,300 l,8oo 8,600 ND NR NR 9.5 360 ND r 1,990 ND ll,7t0
04/30103 t00 3,000 r,600 8,800 ND ND NR NIJ 660 NR NR NR NR
tv19l07 ND 4,850 2,190 13,600 ND ND ND 1.2 513 NR 3460 ND 2,440
07/04109 ND 3,430 2,090 11,400 ND ND ND ND t,520 5,560 40,926 ND I l,?80
07lt9lt3 22 t,250 1,420 8,060 NT)ND '1 3 ND 744 NR NR NR NR
07ltUt4 55.t I,t00 t!300 7,270 ND ND ND ND 831 NR NR NR NR
05120/15 17.2 954 1,250 6,7t0 ND ND 9.4 ND 88t NR NR NR NR
03l2Ut6 l1 854 t,090 5,8?0 ND ND ND NT'632 NR NR NR NR
05lt0lt7 21.6 t,630 t,680 9,510 ND ND ND ND 844 NR NR NR NR
1l16lt7 35.8 1,340 1,490 8,580 ND ND ND ND 8ll NR NR NR NR
06119118 23 t,230 1,400 7,970 ND NT)ND NIJ 724 NR NR NR NR
MW-4 l0/10/01 ND ND ND ND ND ND NR ND ND NR NR NR NR
04130103 ND Nt) Nt)ND ND NI)NR NR ND NR NR NR NR
t1/t9/07 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.3 ND ND ND ND ND ND
03104/09 ND 5.2 ND il.6 ND ND 4.3 ND 12.3 ND t86 ND ND
07120/to Nt)ND ND ND ND ND 87 ND ND ND ND ND ND
07lt9lt3 1.9 ND ND 4.6 ND ND 40 ND ND NR NR NR NR
07ltUt4 2,7 ND ND ND ND 65.9 ND ND NR NR NR NR
05l20lts 2.7 ND ND 6.7 ND ND 106 ND ND NR NR NR NR
03l2ll t6 2.8 ND ND 6.4 ND ND ll6 ND ND NR NR NR NR
051r0117 3.6 ND ND 9.3 ND ND 213 ND ND NR NR NR NR
H:Prc1actsv00011001289 - TFW2AapnsVol &oreun ol HISTORICAL GW Anawcd Page 1 of 2
APPENDIX A
HISTORICAL DATA — SHIELD, 2018
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Project No. 221185 CATLIN Engineers and ScientistsDecember 2022
Analylical ltlelhod---->EPA Method 601/602
EPA
M€thod
504.1 or
62008
EPA
Method
625 or
62008
MADEP
VPH
I,IADEP VPH &
EPH
MADET
EPH
M.\DEP VPH &
EPH
t0 F
Q
X
F
II
l'l
!
ta
a
H
z
U
O
5
il
o
o
a
il
O
O
()
O
g
il
ol
U
il
()
(,)
r5A NCAC 2L.0202
Slandard---->600 600 500 0.4 70 20 0.02 6 400 700 10,000 c+d=
200
rsA NcAc 2L.0il5
Gross Contamination
level--->
5,000 260,000 84,500 85,500 400 70,000 20,000 50 6,000
Location Date wlL us/L ur/L tslL u!/L wlL us/L tplL wlL U!/L ug/L nxlL tslL
MW-4
CONT
1!/t6/17 1.2 ND ND ND ND ND 261 ND ND NR NR NR NR
06/t9lt8 ND ND ND ND ND ND 242 ND ND NR NR NR NR
MW-5 04t30/03 ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NA ND NR NR NR NR
lt/19/07 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4l 144 ND ND ND
01t04109 ND tg ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.9 NI'ND NI)ND
01 / t9/ t3 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR
07lt I lt4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR
05t20/15 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR
03t21716 ND ND ND ND Nt)ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR
05l10lt'? ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR
It/16il'1 ND ND ND ND Nt)ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR
06/t9/t8 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR
T-l I 0/l 0/0 l 390 7.8 9.4 t40 44 NR NR 2.8 24 8s0 270 ND 2s0
04t30/03 l7 2.8 ND 14.',l 8.1 ND NR ND 3.r NR NR NR NR
1l/t9/0'1 43.8 ND ND ND 1.1 ND 210 ND ND ND ND ND ND
03/04t09 20.7 ND ND ND 25,7 ND ND ND t4.4 320 ND ND ND
07/19/13 135 30.6 6.2 27.t 23.9 2.4 83 ND 7-7 NR NR NR NR
07/1114 172 0.59 5.5 13.3 43.7 2.8 2.1 ND 3.9 NR NR NR NR
05t20/15 il5 0.s4 1.5 16.2 43.9 3.2 Ll ND NR NR NR NR
03/2t/t6 t8.5 ND 0.58 ND l0.l 0.78 ND ND ND NR NR NR NR
0s/t0il7 117 0.s3 15.3 29.6 2A t.'7 ND ND 6.8 NR NR NR NR
I vt6lt7 3,120 t3.l 585 1,423 321 25 _7 ND ND 253 NR NR NR NR
061191 ta s80 2 71.'7 t2'7.6 198 19.5 41 ND 44.4 NR NR NR NR
Table 4:
Sunrnrary of Ilistorical Analytical Results-Groundlvater Sanrples
Texaco Food Mart #2
1700 Cotton Grove Road, Lexington, North Carolina
NCDENR lncident # 22332
Notes:
ug/l= Micrograms per liter. ND = Below Melhod Delection Limit
NR : Analysis not requested. Bold numbers exceed I 5A NCAC 2L.0202 standards.
l5A. NCAC 2L.0202 : NCDEQ Standard Statute for non{isked based maxinrum allowable containment concentration ir groundwater
Italicized Bold nrmbers exceed Gross Contaminant Levels = As presented in NCDEQ "Guidelines for Assessment and Corrective Action," Iast revised December I , 20 I 3.
Other delected analytes can be seen in the anal)4ical data.
Page 2 ol 2HlPtoiecrs\20061 001 249 IF MnNepons\2014 o^Suln ol I'ISIORICAL GW Analytbal
APPENDIX A
HISTORICAL DATA — SHIELD, 2018
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Project No. 221185 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists December 2022

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022

APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS – NOVEMBER 15, 2022
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2_Site Photos CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022
View of MW-01 installation.
View of MW-02 installation.
APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS – NOVEMBER 15, 2022
NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2_Site Photos CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022
View of MW-03 installation.
View of cuttings after drilling.
APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS – NOVEMBER 25, 2022

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2_Site Photos CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022

View of site, facing northeast.

View of MW-01, facing east.
APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS – NOVEMBER 25, 2022

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2_Site Photos CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022

View of MW-02, facing north.

View of MW-03, facing east.

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022

APPENDIX C
JOB HAZARD ANALYSES AND
FIELD DATA SHEETS

Source Exposure Limit
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 0.5 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 100 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 20 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 100 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 50 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 10 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Source Exposure Limit
atmosphere N/A
atmosphere N/A
surroundings N/A
Drill Rig N/A
tools and materials N/A
Drill Rig N/A
Drill Rig 85 dBA
Exposure Potential
Likely
Likely
Likely
Start Stop
4:00 4:10
4:10 6:15
6:15 10:00
10:00 10:30
10:30 12:45
12:45 13:35
13:35 14:00
Date and Time:
11/15/22 @ 14:00
11/15/22 @ 14:00
11/15/22 @ 14:00
11/15/22 @ 14:00
11/15/22 @ 14:00
Site-Specific Job Hazard Analysis
Operational Phase Task/Operation Location Where Task/Operation Performed
Monitoring Soil Borings/Well Installations Durham, NC
ETHYL BENZENE ppm
Date(s) this JHA
Conducted:
11/15/22
Employee Certifying this JHA
Print Name: Benjamin J. Ashba, P.G.Signature:
Weather:Cloudy/rain, 30s
Potential Chemicals Concentration
BENZENE ppm
TOLUENE ppm
XYLENE, ALL ISOMERS ppm
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER ppm
NAPHTHALENE ppm
* Gas and/or Diesel
Physical Hazards
Name of Physical Hazard Exposure Level/ Potential
Cold Weather Operations Unlikely
Heat (ambient)Likely
Slips/Trips/Falls Likely
Insect bites and stings surroundings
Drill Rig Operations Likely
Heavy Lifting/ Moving Likely
Rolling or Pinching Objects Likely
Noise Likely
Biological Hazards
Name of Biological Hazard Source
Depart from site.
Snakes surroundings
Poison Plants (Ivy, Oak, and/or Sumac)surroundings
DAILY TASK
Vehicle #50
Mileage:Start: End:
Arrive on-site. Health and Safety Meeting - working in the dark, traffic control, hearing protection/PPE.
Drill and install MW-01. Decon augers, move to MW-02 location.
Drill and install MW-02.
Clean up parking lot.
Mo rig to MW-03 location. Drill and install MW-03.
Survey TOC elevations. Develop MW-01, MW-02, MW-03. Clean up site and decon augers.
PERSONNEL ONSITE
Name and Company (Print)Signature
Thomas Chalmers/CATLIN
Carter Black/CATLIN
Equipment Used:PPE D/Water Level Indicator/Sampling Supplies/Generator/Pressure Washer
Cameron Stratton/CATLIN
Benjamin Ashba/CATLIN
Nathaniel Newman/CATLIN
Page 1 of 1
CLIENT'S CATLIN
NAME:PROJECT:
CATLIN PROJECT #:PHASE:
INSTRUMENT #:
ELEVATION (TBM):DATE:11/15/2022 ROD #:UNITS (FT./M):
TOP
BOTTOM5.435.266.255.967.486.855.435.26
FIELD NOTES BY:DATE:11/15/2022 INSTRUMENT BY:
NOTES REDUCED BY:DATE:ROD PERSON:
100.00
POINT ANGLE
(degrees)
DISTANCE
(feet)MID (-)(+)
REDUCED LEVEL NOTES
NCDEQ - SLP Former Texaco Foodmart No. 2
221185
BENCH MARK DESC.:MW-03 846599
HI ELEV. (feet)CHECK (T+B)/2 NOTES
1 0 17 5.34 105.34 100.00 5.35
2 168 29 6.10 99.24 6.11
3 249 63 7.16 98.18 7.17
4 0 17 5.34 100.00 5.35
105.34 0.00
6 0 105.34
5 0
0.00
7 0 105.34 0.00
8 0 105.34 0.00
105.34 0.00
10 0 105.34
9 0
0.00
11 0 105.34 0.00
12 0 105.34 0.00
105.34 0.00
14 0 105.34
13 0
0.00
15 0 105.34 0.00
16 0 105.34 0.00
105.34 0.00
18 0 105.34
17 0
0.00
19 0 105.34 0.00
20 0 105.34 0.00
105.34 0.00
22 0 105.34
21 0
0.00
23 0 105.34 0.00
24 0 105.34 0.00
105.34 0.00
26 0 105.34
25 0
0.00
27 0 105.34 0.00
28 0 105.34 0.00
105.34 0.00
30 0 105.34
29 0
HI - (-) = ELEV.* A sketch must be provided with the level notes.
Carter Black Carter Black
Nate Newman
0.00
(+) = MID at TBM or BM (TOP - BOTTOM) * 100 = DISTANCE
TBM + (+) = HI (TOP + BOTTOM)/2 = MID (-)
Source Exposure Limit
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 0.5 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 100 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 20 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 100 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 50 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Groundwater and/or soil vapor 10 ppm TLV-TWA ACGIH
Source Exposure Limit
atmosphere N/A
atmosphere N/A
surroundings N/A
Exposure Potential
Likely
Likely
Likely
Start Stop
8:00 10:00
10:00 10:15
10:15 11:30
11:30 11:45
Date and Time:
11/25/22 @ 11:45
Equipment Used:PPE D
Van #39 Mileage:
Weather:
Mob and Travel to site
On site safety briefing. Watch for snakes. Wear safety vest when near the road. Watch for cars when near and
crossing road/parking lot.
Gauged and sampled on-site wells (MW-01, MW-02, MW-03)
Biological Hazards
Name of Biological Hazard Source
Insect bites and stings
Cold Weather Operations Unlikely
Heat (ambient)
DAILY TASK
Snakes surroundings
Poison Plants (Ivy, Oak, and/or Sumac)surroundings
PERSONNEL ONSITE
Name and Company (Print)Signature
Nathaniel Newman / CATLIN
Chemical Hazards
Cloudy 50s
Site-Specific Job Hazard Analysis
Location Where Task/Operation Performed
Durham, NC
Task/Operation
Gauge and Sample Wells
Employee Certifying this JHA
Print Name: Sean O'Neil, P.E.Signature:
Operational Phase
Monitoring
Date(s) this JHA
Conducted:
11/25/22
Potential Chemicals Concentration
BENZENE ppm
ETHYL BENZENE ppm
TOLUENE ppm
XYLENE, ALL ISOMERS ppm
METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER ppm
NAPHTHALENE ppm
Physical Hazards
Name of Physical Hazard Exposure Level/ Potential
* Gas and/or Diesel
Likely
Slips/Trips/Falls Likely
surroundings
Picked up ice for samples
Start:End:
CATLIN PROJECT:SAMPLED BY:
CATLIN PROJECT # :DATE SAMPLED:
CLIENT'S NAME:
MW-01 8.51
21.49 1.389
NMT 4.166
30 6.944
2
Method:Bailer Purge Start Time:10:20
Required Bails for 3 Well Volumes:18 Purge Stop Time:10:28
Required Bails for 5 Well Volumes:29 Was Well Purged Dry?No
Number of Bails Removed:18 Sample Time:10:28
Groundwater Removed (gal):4.3
Equipment Used:
Time
Specific
Cond.
(µS/cm)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
pH
(Standard
Units)
ORP
(mV)
Temperature
(Co)
10:20 0.00 58.79 5.12 410.29 16.56
10:21 0.06 5.67 425.69 17.94
10:22 114.24 4.97 5.45 429.13 20.41
10:23 112.72 7.08 5.54 422.32 20.63
10:24 108.85 9.76 5.61 415.88 20.64
10:25 104.51 3.88 5.61 410.58 20.60
10:26 103.95 6.84 5.64 402.47 20.57
10:27 88.30 29.53 5.62 399.19 20.50
Laboratory:Con-Test Analysis:
Well Data
Well ID
Depth to Product (ft below TOC)
Total Well Depth (ft)
Purging Information Information
Volume of Groundwater in Well
Well Diameter (inches)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FORM
Water Column (ft below TOC)
One Well Volume (gal)
Three Well Volumes (gal)
Five Well Volumes (gal)
6200B
Laboratory Analysis Information
Geochemical Parameters
Depth to Water (ft below TOC)
moderate turbidity red slight
HCO odor
Aqua Troll 600
Turbidity and Additional
Sampling Notes
NC-DEQ
Monitoring Well Information
Nate Newman
11/25/2022
Former Texaco FoodMart No.2
221185
CATLIN PROJECT:SAMPLED BY:
CATLIN PROJECT # :DATE SAMPLED:
CLIENT'S NAME:
MW-02 9.34
20.66 1.524
NMT 4.573
30 7.621
2
Method:Bailer Purge Start Time:10:43
Required Bails for 3 Well Volumes:20 Purge Stop Time:10:53
Required Bails for 5 Well Volumes:32 Was Well Purged Dry?No
Number of Bails Removed:20 Sample Time:10:53
Groundwater Removed (gal):4.8
Equipment Used:
Time
Specific
Cond.
(µS/cm)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
pH
(Standard
Units)
ORP
(mV)
Temperature
(Co)
10:43 0.06 NM 6.09 413.65 18.57
10:44 106.52 NM 5.31 437.29 20.19
10:45 104.01 NM 5.39 435.35 20.56
10:46 101.86 NM 5.40 435.84 20.70
10:47 100.34 NM 5.48 432.92 20.67
10:48 97.99 NM 5.45 435.33 20.68
10:49 96.19 NM 5.42 438.28 20.66
10:50 95.81 NM 5.44 437.23 20.63
10:51 95.11 NM 5.42 439.14 20.54
Laboratory:Con-Test Analysis:6200B
Depth to Product (ft below TOC)Three Well Volumes (gal)
Total Well Depth (ft)Five Well Volumes (gal)
Well Diameter (inches)
Purging Information Information
Geochemical Parameters
Aqua Troll 600
Turbidity and Additional
Sampling Notes
high turbidity orange
Laboratory Analysis Information
Depth to Water (ft below TOC)One Well Volume (gal)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FORM
Former Texaco FoodMart No.2 Nate Newman
221185 11/25/2022
NC-DEQ
Monitoring Well Information
Well Data Volume of Groundwater in Well
Well ID Water Column (ft below TOC)
CATLIN PROJECT:SAMPLED BY:
CATLIN PROJECT # :DATE SAMPLED:
CLIENT'S NAME:
MW-03 7.60
22.4 1.240
NMT 3.721
30 6.202
2
Method:Bailer Purge Start Time:11:02
Required Bails for 3 Well Volumes:16 Purge Stop Time:11:09
Required Bails for 5 Well Volumes:26 Was Well Purged Dry?No
Number of Bails Removed:16 Sample Time:11:11
Groundwater Removed (gal):3.8
Equipment Used:
Time
Specific
Cond.
(µS/cm)
Dissolved
Oxygen
(mg/L)
pH
(Standard
Units)
ORP
(mV)
Temperature
(Co)
11:02 0.06 NM 5.25 445.90 17.97
11:03 64.70 NM 5.25 453.62 19.27
11:04 62.24 NM 5.31 451.55 19.45
11:05 60.13 NM 5.31 451.55 19.53
11:06 56.96 NM 5.32 451.73 19.57
11:07 56.17 NM 5.37 448.44 19.57
Laboratory:Con-Test Analysis:6200B
Depth to Product (ft below TOC)Three Well Volumes (gal)
Total Well Depth (ft)Five Well Volumes (gal)
Well Diameter (inches)
Purging Information Information
Geochemical Parameters
Aqua Troll 600
Turbidity and Additional
Sampling Notes
high turbidity red. bailed
almost dry so gave time to
recharge for a less turbid
sample
Laboratory Analysis Information
Depth to Water (ft below TOC)One Well Volume (gal)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FORM
Former Texaco FoodMart No.2 Nate Newman
221185 11/25/2022
NC-DEQ
Monitoring Well Information
Well Data Volume of Groundwater in Well
Well ID Water Column (ft below TOC)

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022

APPENDIX D

WELL LOGS AND
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORDS
30.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
28.0
4
6
7
5
5
2
5
21
2
2
2
2
1
2
6
5
4
3
3
1
4
15
4
4
2
2
1
2
30.0
15.0
30.0
- 0.4 0.5
13.0
30.02" Sch. 40 PVC2" Slot .010Sch. 40 PVCD
D
D
M
M
Sat.
W
0.5
2.5
10.0
20.0
0.5
2.5
10.0
20.0
30.0
ASPHALT
(SW) - Brown, F. SAND with f. to med. gravel
(CL) - Brown, CLAY with silt with HCO
(ML) - Brown, Clayey SILT with HCO
(CL) - Brown, Silty CLAY with HCO
BORING TERMINATED AT ELEVATION 69.2 ft in Silty
CLAY
98.7
96.7
89.2
79.2
98.7
96.7
89.2
79.2
69.2
0.1
1270
616.3
543.9
1611
1730
647
DRILL MACHINE:Diedrich D-50 METHOD:HSA
COUNTY:DAVIDSON
1626400 740442
T.O.C. ELEV.:
TOTAL DEPTH:
WELL DEPTH:
NC
SHEET
25.4
NM
DEPTH
1
98.84
30.0
30.0
0 HOUR DTW:
24 HOUR DTW:END DATE:11/15/22
OF1
BORING LOCATION:LEFT TURN EXIT
BLOW COUNT
0.5ft
START DATE:11/15/22
0.5ft
WELL ID:
STATE:
MW-01NORTHING:
LOGGED BY:
DRILLER:
CREW:
0.5ft0.5ft
EASTING:
PROJECT NO.:221185
SYSTEM:NCSP NAD 83 (USft)
FORMER TEXACO FOODMART NO.2PROJECT:C. BLACK
D.T. CHALMERS, JR.
C. STRATTON
LOCATION:LEXINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL, CIVILGEOTECHNICAL
Wilmington, Raleigh, Washington,Charleston
CATLIN BORING LOG 221185_NCDEQ SLP FORMER TEXACO FOODMART NO.2.GPJ CATLIN.GDT 11/23/22Portland Cement Bentonite Pellets #2 Medium Sand
0.0
WELL LOG
WELL
DETAIL
SOIL AND ROCK
DESCRIPTIONLAB.DEPTH
MOIS
0.0 LAND SURFACE
LOG ELEVATION
99.2
OVA
(ppm)
221185
11/15/22
HSA
4146A
25.35
MW-01
-80.259585
D.T. CHALMERS, JR.
35.777953
DAVIDSON
1
X
11/23/2022
8.25
Surface Pour
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
X
2 Slot .010
1700 COTTON GROVE RD., LEXINGTON, 27292
Bent. Pellets13
15
Concrete
N/A
13 30 Torpedo Sand
30.0
X
0.5
0.5
0.4
15 30 PVC
2
Sch. 40
Surface Pour
0.4 Sch. 40 PVC
Well ID#:
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Physical Address, City, and Zip
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N
6. Is (are) the well(s):
Yes
TemporaryPermanent or
or No7. Is this a repair to an existing well:
8. Number of wells constructed:
For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, youcan submit one form.
9. Total well depth below land surface:
For multiple wells list all depths in different (example- 3@200' and 2@100')
W
(ft.)10. Static water level below top of casing:
If water level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter:
MATERIAL
FROM
Residential Water Supply (shared)
Adapted from Form GW-1
ft.
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
(ft.)
(in.)
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.in.
in.
ft.
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
13b. Disinfection type:
22. Certification:
Revised 2-22-2016
ft.NCDEQ-Former Texaco Food Mart No.2
TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
FROM17. SCREEN DIAMETER SLOT SIZE MATERIALTHICKNESS
FROM TO MATERIAL
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
FROM TO
18. GROUT
MATERIAL
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
1. Well Contractor Information:
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
Well Contractor Name
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
Industrial/Commercial
Irrigation
15. INNER CASING OR TUBING (geothermal closed-loop)
Municipal/Public
Residential Water Supply (single)
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
TO
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
in.
in.
in.
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
Recovery
Injection Well:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of
this record has been provided to the well owner.
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature ofthe repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
12. Well construction method:
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
13a. Yield (gpm)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
Method of test:
Amount:
For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
FROM TO
24c. For Water Sypply & Injection Wells:Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of wellconstruction to the county health department of the county where constructed.
DIAMETER THICKNESS
FROM TO DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soil/rock type, grain size, etc.)
21. REMARKS
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of wellconstruction to the following:
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
16. OUTER CASING (for multi-cased wells) OR LINER (if applicable)
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources
24b. For Injection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to theaddress in 24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days ofcompletion of well construction to the following:
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Stormwater Drainage
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Aquifer Test
Experimental Technology
Geothermal (Closed Loop)
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
Salinity Barrier
Subsidence Control
Tracer
Other (explain under #21 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed:
5a. Well Location:SEE
ATTAC
H
E
D
0-011600
N/A
Surface Pour
32.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
2
7
7
8
6
2
2
5
3
2
3
3
1
1
2
5
4
6
5
1
3
3
4
4
5
4
2
2
30.0
15.0
30.0
- 0.5 1.0
13.0
32.02" Sch. 40 PVC2" Slot .010Sch. 40 PVCW
W
W
W
W
Sat.
Sat.
0.51.0
10.0
15.0
17.0
30.0
0.51.0
10.0
15.0
17.0
30.0
32.0
ASPHALT
(GWS) - Gray CSE. SAND and GRAVEL. Slight HCO
(CL) - Reddish brown, Silty CLAY with tr. med. cse.
gravel. Slight HCO
No gravel or HCO from 5-10' BLS
(CL) - Brown to red and black, Silty CLAY. Slight HCO
NO RECOVERY
(CL) - Brown to red and black, Silty CLAY. Slight HCO.
(CH) - Brown to red and black, Silty highly plastic CLAY.
Slight HCO.
BORING TERMINATED AT ELEVATION 66.2 ft in Silty
CLAY
97.797.2
88.2
83.2
81.2
68.2
97.797.2
88.2
83.2
81.2
68.2
66.2
1.2
0.4
0
NM
1.0
0.8
0.0
DRILL MACHINE:Diedrich D-50 METHOD:HSA
COUNTY:DAVIDSON
1626416 740397
T.O.C. ELEV.:
TOTAL DEPTH:
WELL DEPTH:
NC
SHEET
21.6
NM
DEPTH
1
97.68
32.0
30.0
0 HOUR DTW:
24 HOUR DTW:END DATE:11/15/22
OF1
BORING LOCATION:~7 FT IN FRONT OF RIGHT SIDE DOOR
BLOW COUNT
0.5ft
START DATE:11/15/22
0.5ft
WELL ID:
STATE:
MW-02NORTHING:
LOGGED BY:
DRILLER:
CREW:
0.5ft0.5ft
EASTING:
PROJECT NO.:221185
SYSTEM:NCSP NAD 83 (USft)
FORMER TEXACO FOODMART NO.2PROJECT:C. BLACK
D.T. CHALMERS, JR.
C. STRATTON
LOCATION:LEXINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL, CIVILGEOTECHNICAL
Wilmington, Raleigh, Washington,Charleston
CATLIN BORING LOG 221185_NCDEQ SLP FORMER TEXACO FOODMART NO.2.GPJ CATLIN.GDT 11/23/22Portland Cement Bentonite Pellets #2 Medium Sand
0.0
WELL LOG
WELL
DETAIL
SOIL AND ROCK
DESCRIPTIONLAB.DEPTH
MOIS
0.0 LAND SURFACE
LOG ELEVATION
98.2
OVA
(ppm)
221185
11/15/22
HSA
4146A
21.63
MW-02
-80.259529
D.T. CHALMERS, JR.
35.777831
DAVIDSON
1
X
11/23/2022
8.25
Surface Pour
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
X
2 Slot .010
1700 COTTON GROVE RD., LEXINGTON, 27292
Bent.13
15
Concrete
N/A
13 32 Torpedo Sand
30.0
X
1
1
0.5
15 30 PVC
2
Sch. 40
Surface Pour
0.5 Sch. 40 PVC
Well ID#:
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Physical Address, City, and Zip
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N
6. Is (are) the well(s):
Yes
TemporaryPermanent or
or No7. Is this a repair to an existing well:
8. Number of wells constructed:
For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, youcan submit one form.
9. Total well depth below land surface:
For multiple wells list all depths in different (example- 3@200' and 2@100')
W
(ft.)10. Static water level below top of casing:
If water level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter:
MATERIAL
FROM
Residential Water Supply (shared)
Adapted from Form GW-1
ft.
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
(ft.)
(in.)
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.in.
in.
ft.
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
13b. Disinfection type:
22. Certification:
Revised 2-22-2016
ft.
TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
FROM17. SCREEN DIAMETER SLOT SIZE MATERIALTHICKNESS
FROM TO MATERIAL
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
FROM TO
18. GROUT
MATERIAL
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
1. Well Contractor Information:
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
Well Contractor Name
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
Industrial/Commercial
Irrigation
15. INNER CASING OR TUBING (geothermal closed-loop)
Municipal/Public
Residential Water Supply (single)
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
TO
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
in.
in.
in.
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
Recovery
Injection Well:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of
this record has been provided to the well owner.
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature ofthe repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
12. Well construction method:
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
13a. Yield (gpm)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
Method of test:
Amount:
For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
FROM TO
24c. For Water Sypply & Injection Wells:Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of wellconstruction to the county health department of the county where constructed.
DIAMETER THICKNESS
FROM TO DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soil/rock type, grain size, etc.)
21. REMARKS
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of wellconstruction to the following:
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
16. OUTER CASING (for multi-cased wells) OR LINER (if applicable)
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources
24b. For Injection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to theaddress in 24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days ofcompletion of well construction to the following:
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Stormwater Drainage
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Aquifer Test
Experimental Technology
Geothermal (Closed Loop)
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
Salinity Barrier
Subsidence Control
Tracer
Other (explain under #21 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed:
5a. Well Location:SEE
ATTAC
H
E
D
0-011600
N/A
NCDEQ-Former Texaco Food Mart No.2
Surface Pour
32.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
5
9
5
4
6
5
7
5
2
2
1
2
2
2
5
5
3
3
3
3
5
10
3
2
2
2
2
2
30.0
15.0
30.0
- 0.5 0.6
13.0
32.02" Sch. 40 PVC2" Slot .010Sch. 40 PVCM
M
D
M
M
M
M
0.5
15.0
0.5
15.0
32.0
TOPSOIL
(CL) - Brown to red and black, Silty CLAY
(ML) - Brown and red grading to lt. broen with black and
gray, Clayey SILT
BORING TERMINATED AT ELEVATION 68.0 ft in
Clayey SILT
99.5
85.0
99.5
85.0
68.0
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.1
DRILL MACHINE:Diedrich D-50 METHOD:HSA
COUNTY:DAVIDSON
1626482 740465
T.O.C. ELEV.:
TOTAL DEPTH:
WELL DEPTH:
NC
SHEET
23.6
NM
DEPTH
1
99.50
32.0
30.0
0 HOUR DTW:
24 HOUR DTW:END DATE:11/15/22
OF1
BORING LOCATION:~8 FT FROM LIGHT POLE IN FRONT IN GRASSY
BLOW COUNT
0.5ft
START DATE:11/15/22
0.5ft
WELL ID:
STATE:
MW-03NORTHING:
LOGGED BY:
DRILLER:
CREW:
0.5ft0.5ft
EASTING:
PROJECT NO.:221185
SYSTEM:NCSP NAD 83 (USft)
FORMER TEXACO FOODMART NO.2PROJECT:C. BLACK
D.T. CHALMERS, JR.
C. STRATTON
LOCATION:LEXINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL, CIVILGEOTECHNICAL
Wilmington, Raleigh, Washington,Charleston
CATLIN BORING LOG 221185_NCDEQ SLP FORMER TEXACO FOODMART NO.2.GPJ CATLIN.GDT 11/23/22Portland Cement Bentonite Pellets #2 Medium Sand
0.0
WELL LOG
WELL
DETAIL
SOIL AND ROCK
DESCRIPTIONLAB.DEPTH
MOIS
0.0 LAND SURFACE
LOG ELEVATION
100.0
OVA
(ppm)
221185
11/15/22
HSA
4146A
23.62
MW-03
-80.25931
D.T. CHALMERS, JR.
35.77802
DAVIDSON
1
X
11/23/2022
8.25
Surface Pour
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
X
2 Slot .010
1700 COTTON GROVE RD., LEXINGTON, 27292
Bent.13
15
Concrete
N/A
13 32 Torpedo Sand
30.0
X
0.6
0.6
0.5
15 30 PVC
2
Sch. 40
Surface Pour
0.5 Sch. 40 PVC
Well ID#:
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Physical Address, City, and Zip
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N
6. Is (are) the well(s):
Yes
TemporaryPermanent or
or No7. Is this a repair to an existing well:
8. Number of wells constructed:
For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, youcan submit one form.
9. Total well depth below land surface:
For multiple wells list all depths in different (example- 3@200' and 2@100')
W
(ft.)10. Static water level below top of casing:
If water level is above casing, use "+"
11. Borehole diameter:
MATERIAL
FROM
Residential Water Supply (shared)
Adapted from Form GW-1
ft.
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
(ft.)
(in.)
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.in.
in.
ft.
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
13b. Disinfection type:
22. Certification:
Revised 2-22-2016
ft.
TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
FROM17. SCREEN DIAMETER SLOT SIZE MATERIALTHICKNESS
FROM TO MATERIAL
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.
FROM TO
18. GROUT
MATERIAL
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
1. Well Contractor Information:
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
Well Contractor Name
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit #:List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
Agricultural
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
Industrial/Commercial
Irrigation
15. INNER CASING OR TUBING (geothermal closed-loop)
Municipal/Public
Residential Water Supply (single)
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
ft.ft.
ft.
TO
EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
in.
in.
in.
EMPLACEMENT METHOD
Recovery
Injection Well:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of
this record has been provided to the well owner.
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature ofthe repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
12. Well construction method:
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
13a. Yield (gpm)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
Method of test:
Amount:
For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
FROM TO
24c. For Water Sypply & Injection Wells:Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of wellconstruction to the county health department of the county where constructed.
DIAMETER THICKNESS
FROM TO DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soil/rock type, grain size, etc.)
21. REMARKS
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of wellconstruction to the following:
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit,1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program,1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
16. OUTER CASING (for multi-cased wells) OR LINER (if applicable)
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources
24b. For Injection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to theaddress in 24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days ofcompletion of well construction to the following:
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Stormwater Drainage
Aquifer Storage and Recovery
Aquifer Test
Experimental Technology
Geothermal (Closed Loop)
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return)
Salinity Barrier
Subsidence Control
Tracer
Other (explain under #21 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed:
5a. Well Location:SEE
ATTAC
H
E
D
0-011600
N/A
NCDEQ-Former Texaco Food Mart No.2
Surface Pour

NCDEQ; 22332_Former Texaco Food Mart #2 CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 221185 December 2022

APPENDIX E

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT AND
CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENT

39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
December 6, 2022
Sean O’Neil
CATLIN Engineers & Scientists
1044 Washington Street
Raleigh, NC 27605
Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Client Job Number:
Project Number: 221185.2
Laboratory Work Order Number: 22K3753
Enclosed are results of analyses for samples as received by the laboratory on November 29, 2022. If you have any questions
concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kaitlyn A. Feliciano
Project Manager
Table of Contents
Sample Summary 3
Case Narrative 4
Sample Results 5
22K3753-01 5
22K3753-02 7
22K3753-03 9
22K3753-04 11
22K3753-05 13
Sample Preparation Information 15
QC Data 16
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS 16
B324471 16
Flag/Qualifier Summary 20
Certifications 21
Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt 23
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
12/6/2022
CATLIN Engineers & Scientists
1044 Washington Street
Raleigh, NC 27605
ATTN: Sean O’Neil
221185.2
22K3753
The results of analyses performed on the following samples submitted to CON-TEST, a Pace Analytical Laboratory, are found in this report.
PROJECT LOCATION:
PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
REPORT DATE:
WORK ORDER NUMBER:
FIELD SAMPLE #LAB ID:MATRIX TESTSAMPLE DESCRIPTION SUB LAB
Lexinhton, NC
221128-2
MW-01 22K3753-01 Ground Water -
SM21-23 6200B
MW-02 22K3753-02 Ground Water SM21-23 6200B
MW-03 22K3753-03 Ground Water SM21-23 6200B
Field Blank 22K3753-04 Water SM21-23 6200B
Trip Blank 22K3753-05 Water SM21-23 6200B
[TOC_1]Sample Summary[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
CASE NARRATIVE SUMMARY
All reported results are within defined laboratory quality control objectives unless listed below or otherwise qualified in this report.
For method 6200B elevated reporting limits for sample 22K3753-01 due to high concentrations of target compounds.
REVISED REPORT 12/06/22- Sample -01 ID revised
[TOC_1]Case Narrative[TOC]
SM21-23 6200B
Qualifications:
Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery and duplicate recoveries outside of control limits. Data validation is not
affected since all results are "not detected" for associated samples in this batch and bias is on the high side.Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified:
L-02
Bromomethane
B324471-BS1, B324471-BSD1
Chloromethane
B324471-BS1, B324471-BSD1
Vinyl Chloride
B324471-BS1, B324471-BSD1
Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery and/or duplicate recovery are outside of control limits. Reported value for this
compound is likely to be biased on the high side.
Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified:
L-06
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
22K3753-02[MW-02], 22K3753-03[MW-03], B324471-BS1, B324471-BSD1
Either laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample or duplicate recovery is outside of control limits, but the other is within limits. RPD
between the two LFB/LCS results is within method specified criteria.Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified:
L-07
Acetone
B324471-BSD1
Elevated reporting limit due to high concentration of target compounds.
Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified:
RL-11
22K3753-01[MW-01]
The results of analyses reported only relate to samples submitted to Con-Test, a Pace Analytical Laboratory, for testing.
I certify that the analyses listed above, unless specifically listed as subcontracted, if any, were performed under my direction according to the approved methodologies listed
in this document, and that based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.
Kaitlyn A. Feliciano
Project Manager
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 11/29/2022
Work Order: 22K3753Sample Description:Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Sample ID: 22K3753-01
Field Sample #: MW-01
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 11/25/2022 10:28
[TOC_2]22K3753-01[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Sample Flags: RL-11 Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 25000 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L1000 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Acetone
9600 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L100 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Benzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L75 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Bromobenzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L150 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Bromochloromethane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L90 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Bromodichloromethane
ND 1000 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L190 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Bromoform
ND 1000 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L770 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Bromomethane
ND 2500 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L810 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5002-Butanone (MEK)
85 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L76 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Jn-Butylbenzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L55 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500sec-Butylbenzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L64 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500tert-Butylbenzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L82 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L53 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Chlorobenzene
ND 25000 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L13000 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Ethanol
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L110 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Chlorodibromomethane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L160 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Chloroethane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L84 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Chloroform
ND 500 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L260 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Chloromethane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L57 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5002-Chlorotoluene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L59 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5004-Chlorotoluene
400 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L85 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L61 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L59 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L65 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L96 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L71 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,1-Dichloroethane
ND 500 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L150 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,2-Dichloroethane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L71 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L73 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L84 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L91 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,2-Dichloropropane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L65 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,3-Dichloropropane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L160 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5002,2-Dichloropropane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L75 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,1-Dichloropropene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L79 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L84 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L64 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
5800 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L110 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Ethylbenzene
ND 2500 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L560 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5002-Hexanone (MBK)
260 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L54 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L49 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
900 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L86 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 2500 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L120 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Methylene Chloride
ND 2500 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L640 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5004-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
[TOC_1]Sample Results[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 11/29/2022
Work Order: 22K3753Sample Description:Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Sample ID: 22K3753-01
Field Sample #: MW-01
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 11/25/2022 10:28
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Sample Flags: RL-11 Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
930 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L120 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Naphthalene
580 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L43 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500n-Propylbenzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L53 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Styrene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L63 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L94 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Tetrachloroethylene
50000 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L110 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Toluene
ND 500 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L150 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L120 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L84 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L91 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L95 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Trichloroethylene
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L88 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L140 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,2,3-Trichloropropane
4300 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L99 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1000 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L57 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B5001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 10000 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L770 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Vinyl Acetate
ND 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L100 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500Vinyl Chloride
20000 500 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L230 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500m+p Xylene
10000 250 12/2/22 1:46 EEHg/L110 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B500o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 90.3 12/2/22 1:4670-130
Toluene-d8 96.4 12/2/22 1:4670-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.2 12/2/22 1:4670-130
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 11/29/2022
Work Order: 22K3753Sample Description:Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Sample ID: 22K3753-02
Field Sample #: MW-02
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 11/25/2022 11:53
[TOC_2]22K3753-02[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L2.0 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Acetone
0.53 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.20 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Benzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.31 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromochloromethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromodichloromethane
ND 2.0 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.38 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromoform
ND 2.0 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L1.5 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromomethane
ND 5.0 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L1.6 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Butanone (MEK)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1n-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1sec-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.16 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chlorobenzene
ND 50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L26 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Ethanol
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.22 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.32 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloroform
ND 1.0 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.52 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloromethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.14 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethane
ND 1.0 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.31 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.14 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.33 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.16 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
7.3 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1L-06Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.21 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Ethylbenzene
ND 5.0 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L1.1 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Hexanone (MBK)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.097 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
1.8 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 5.0 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.23 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Methylene Chloride
ND 5.0 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L1.3 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 11/29/2022
Work Order: 22K3753Sample Description:Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Sample ID: 22K3753-02
Field Sample #: MW-02
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 11/25/2022 11:53
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.24 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Naphthalene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.086 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1n-Propylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Styrene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Tetrachloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.22 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Toluene
ND 1.0 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.30 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.25 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.28 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.20 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 20 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L1.5 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Acetate
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.21 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Chloride
ND 1.0 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.46 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1m+p Xylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 23:02 EEHg/L0.23 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 93.6 12/1/22 23:0270-130
Toluene-d8 98.9 12/1/22 23:0270-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 95.8 12/1/22 23:0270-130
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 11/29/2022
Work Order: 22K3753Sample Description:Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Sample ID: 22K3753-03
Field Sample #: MW-03
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 11/25/2022 11:11
[TOC_2]22K3753-03[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L2.0 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Acetone
1.3 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.20 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Benzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromobenzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.31 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromochloromethane
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromodichloromethane
ND 2.0 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.38 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromoform
ND 2.0 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L1.5 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromomethane
ND 5.0 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L1.6 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Butanone (MEK)
2.8 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1n-Butylbenzene
0.70 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1sec-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.16 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chlorobenzene
ND 50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L26 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Ethanol
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.22 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.32 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloroethane
2.2 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloroform
ND 1.0 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.52 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloromethane
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.14 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethane
ND 1.0 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.31 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.14 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.33 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.16 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.28 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1L-06, JDiisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
0.56 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.21 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Ethylbenzene
ND 5.0 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L1.1 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Hexanone (MBK)
0.53 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
0.59 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.097 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 5.0 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.23 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Methylene Chloride
ND 5.0 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L1.3 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 11/29/2022
Work Order: 22K3753Sample Description:Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Sample ID: 22K3753-03
Field Sample #: MW-03
Sample Matrix: Ground Water
Sampled: 11/25/2022 11:11
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
1.5 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.24 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Naphthalene
0.21 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.086 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Jn-Propylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Styrene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Tetrachloroethylene
2.0 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.22 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Toluene
ND 1.0 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.30 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.25 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.28 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichloropropane
8.8 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.20 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 20 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L1.5 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Acetate
ND 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.21 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Chloride
3.7 1.0 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.46 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1m+p Xylene
1.9 0.50 12/2/22 1:19 EEHg/L0.23 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 94.4 12/2/22 1:1970-130
Toluene-d8 99.0 12/2/22 1:1970-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 95.8 12/2/22 1:1970-130
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 11/29/2022
Work Order: 22K3753Sample Description:Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Sample ID: 22K3753-04
Field Sample #: Field Blank
Sample Matrix: Water
Sampled: 11/25/2022 11:15
[TOC_2]22K3753-04[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
5.9 50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L2.0 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1JAcetone
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.20 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Benzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.31 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromochloromethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromodichloromethane
ND 2.0 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.38 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromoform
ND 2.0 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L1.5 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromomethane
ND 5.0 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L1.6 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Butanone (MEK)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1n-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1sec-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.16 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chlorobenzene
ND 50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L26 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Ethanol
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.22 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.32 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloroform
ND 1.0 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.52 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloromethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.14 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethane
ND 1.0 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.31 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.14 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.33 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.16 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.21 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Ethylbenzene
ND 5.0 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L1.1 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Hexanone (MBK)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.097 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 5.0 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.23 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Methylene Chloride
ND 5.0 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L1.3 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 11/29/2022
Work Order: 22K3753Sample Description:Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Sample ID: 22K3753-04
Field Sample #: Field Blank
Sample Matrix: Water
Sampled: 11/25/2022 11:15
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.24 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Naphthalene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.086 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1n-Propylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Styrene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Tetrachloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.22 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Toluene
ND 1.0 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.30 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.25 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.28 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.20 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 20 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L1.5 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Acetate
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.21 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Chloride
ND 1.0 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.46 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1m+p Xylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:07 EEHg/L0.23 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 93.7 12/1/22 22:0770-130
Toluene-d8 98.4 12/1/22 22:0770-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 94.7 12/1/22 22:0770-130
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 11/29/2022
Work Order: 22K3753Sample Description:Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Sample ID: 22K3753-05
Field Sample #: Trip Blank
Sample Matrix: Water
Sampled: 11/25/2022 00:00
[TOC_2]22K3753-05[TOC]
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L2.0 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Acetone
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.20 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Benzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.31 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromochloromethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromodichloromethane
ND 2.0 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.38 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromoform
ND 2.0 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L1.5 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Bromomethane
ND 5.0 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L1.6 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Butanone (MEK)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1n-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1sec-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1tert-Butylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.16 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chlorobenzene
ND 50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L26 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Ethanol
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.22 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chlorodibromomethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.32 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloroethane
0.88 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloroform
ND 1.0 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.52 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Chloromethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B14-Chlorotoluene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.12 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.14 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethane
ND 1.0 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.31 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.14 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.33 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12,2-Dichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.15 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.16 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.21 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Ethylbenzene
ND 5.0 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L1.1 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B12-Hexanone (MBK)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.097 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
ND 5.0 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.23 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Methylene Chloride
ND 5.0 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L1.3 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B14-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Date Received: 11/29/2022
Work Order: 22K3753Sample Description:Project Location: Lexinhton, NC
Sample ID: 22K3753-05
Field Sample #: Trip Blank
Sample Matrix: Water
Sampled: 11/25/2022 00:00
AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte
Date/Time
DL Units
Date
PreparedMethod
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.24 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Naphthalene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.086 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1n-Propylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Styrene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.13 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Tetrachloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.22 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Toluene
ND 1.0 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.30 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.25 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.17 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.19 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Trichloroethylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.18 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.28 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.20 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.11 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B11,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 20 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L1.5 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Acetate
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.21 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1Vinyl Chloride
ND 1.0 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.46 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1m+p Xylene
ND 0.50 12/1/22 22:34 EEHg/L0.23 12/1/22SM21-23 6200B1o-Xylene
Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 92.6 12/1/22 22:3470-130
Toluene-d8 97.4 12/1/22 22:3470-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene 94.8 12/1/22 22:3470-130
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Sample Extraction Data
Prep Method: SW-846 5030B Analytical Method: SM21-23 6200B
Lab Number [Field ID]Batch DateInitial [mL]Final [mL]
B324471 12/01/220.01 5.0022K3753-01 [MW-01]
B324471 12/01/225 5.0022K3753-02 [MW-02]
B324471 12/01/225 5.0022K3753-03 [MW-03]
B324471 12/01/225 5.0022K3753-04 [Field Blank]
B324471 12/01/225 5.0022K3753-05 [Trip Blank]
[TOC_1]Sample Preparation Information[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
[TOC_2]Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS[TOC]
Batch B324471 - SW-846 5030B
[TOC_3]B324471[TOC]
Blank (B324471-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/01/22
Acetone g/L50ND
Benzene g/L0.50ND
Bromobenzene g/L0.50ND
Bromochloromethane g/L0.50ND
Bromodichloromethane g/L0.50ND
Bromoform g/L0.50ND
Bromomethane g/L2.0ND
2-Butanone (MEK)g/L5.0ND
n-Butylbenzene g/L0.50ND
sec-Butylbenzene g/L0.50ND
tert-Butylbenzene g/L0.50ND
Carbon Tetrachloride g/L0.50ND
Chlorobenzene g/L0.50ND
Ethanol g/L50ND
Chlorodibromomethane g/L0.50ND
Chloroethane g/L0.50ND
Chloroform g/L0.50ND
Chloromethane g/L0.60ND
2-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50ND
4-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50ND
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)g/L0.50ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)g/L0.50ND
1,1-Dichloroethane g/L0.50ND
1,2-Dichloroethane g/L0.50ND
1,1-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50ND
1,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50ND
1,3-Dichloropropane g/L0.50ND
2,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50ND
1,1-Dichloropropene g/L0.50ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50ND
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50ND
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)g/L0.50ND
Ethylbenzene g/L0.50ND
2-Hexanone (MBK)g/L5.0ND
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)g/L0.50ND
p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)g/L0.50ND
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)g/L0.50ND
Methylene Chloride g/L5.0ND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)g/L5.0ND
Naphthalene g/L0.50ND
n-Propylbenzene g/L0.50ND
Styrene g/L0.50ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane g/L0.50ND
Tetrachloroethylene g/L0.50ND
Toluene g/L0.50ND
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene g/L1.0ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene g/L0.50ND
[TOC_1]QC Data[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B324471 - SW-846 5030B
Blank (B324471-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/01/22
1,1,1-Trichloroethane g/L0.50ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane g/L0.50ND
Trichloroethylene g/L0.50ND
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)g/L0.50ND
1,2,3-Trichloropropane g/L0.50ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50ND
Vinyl Acetate g/L20ND
Vinyl Chloride g/L0.50ND
m+p Xylene g/L1.0ND
o-Xylene g/L0.50ND
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 92.023.0
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 98.024.5
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 96.324.1
LCS (B324471-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/01/22
Acetone g/L50 100 70-130129129
Benzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010910.9
Bromobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011411.4
Bromochloromethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13012312.3
Bromodichloromethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010810.8
Bromoform g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010210.2
Bromomethane g/L2.0 10.0 L-0260-140167*16.7
2-Butanone (MEK)g/L5.0 100 70-130118118
n-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13099.99.99
sec-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010510.5
tert-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010910.9
Carbon Tetrachloride g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011311.3
Chlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011511.5
Ethanol g/L50 100 70-130108108
Chlorodibromomethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010810.8
Chloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 60-14013713.7
Chloroform g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011411.4
Chloromethane g/L0.60 10.0 L-0260-140144*14.4
2-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010210.2
4-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010910.9
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010610.6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011311.3
1,3-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011211.2
1,4-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011011.0
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)g/L0.50 10.0 60-14010510.5
1,1-Dichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011611.6
1,2-Dichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010910.9
1,1-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13081.18.11
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011811.8
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011411.4
1,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011911.9
1,3-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011411.4
2,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13094.29.42
1,1-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011811.8
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010710.7
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010010.0
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B324471 - SW-846 5030B
LCS (B324471-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/01/22
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)g/L0.50 10.0 L-0670-130137*13.7
Ethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011611.6
2-Hexanone (MBK)g/L5.0 100 70-130118118
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011211.2
p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010510.5
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011011.0
Methylene Chloride g/L5.0 10.0 70-13092.99.29
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)g/L5.0 100 70-130122122
Naphthalene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13071.47.14
n-Propylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010510.5
Styrene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011111.1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13097.49.74
Tetrachloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13012612.6
Toluene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011411.4
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene g/L1.0 10.0 70-13085.28.52
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13088.28.82
1,1,1-Trichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011211.2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011711.7
Trichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13012612.6
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011711.7
1,2,3-Trichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010410.4
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010610.6
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13010610.6
Vinyl Acetate g/L20 100 70-13073.373.3
Vinyl Chloride g/L0.50 10.0 L-0260-140278*27.8
m+p Xylene g/L1.0 20.0 70-13011422.8
o-Xylene g/L0.50 10.0 70-13011411.4
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95.623.9
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 97.724.4
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.825.0
LCS Dup (B324471-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/01/22
Acetone g/L50 100 25 L-0770-130136 5.15*136
Benzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130108 1.1010.8
Bromobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130112 1.6011.2
Bromochloromethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130122 0.89912.2
Bromodichloromethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130110 1.8311.0
Bromoform g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130100 2.4710.0
Bromomethane g/L2.0 10.0 25 L-0260-140154 7.84*15.4
2-Butanone (MEK)g/L5.0 100 2570-130118 0.0677118
n-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13095.2 4.829.52
sec-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13099.6 5.669.96
tert-Butylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130104 4.6810.4
Carbon Tetrachloride g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130112 1.0711.2
Chlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130110 3.9111.0
Ethanol g/L50 100 2570-130116 6.95116
Chlorodibromomethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130105 2.4510.5
Chloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2560-140134 2.2113.4
Chloroform g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130112 1.1511.2
Chloromethane g/L0.60 10.0 25 L-0260-140146 1.17*14.6
2-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13099.0 2.899.90
4-Chlorotoluene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130102 6.9310.2
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control
QUALITY CONTROL
Batch B324471 - SW-846 5030B
LCS Dup (B324471-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/01/22
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130103 3.1610.3
1,2-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130111 2.1411.1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130106 5.4810.6
1,4-Dichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130107 3.1310.7
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)g/L0.50 10.0 2560-140101 3.9810.1
1,1-Dichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130115 0.60711.5
1,2-Dichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130103 5.6710.3
1,1-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13077.2 4.937.72
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130118 0.084811.8
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130111 2.1311.1
1,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130117 1.6911.7
1,3-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130110 3.6511.0
2,2-Dichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13091.1 3.359.11
1,1-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130120 1.1812.0
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13099.7 6.789.97
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13097.8 2.529.78
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)g/L0.50 10.0 25 L-0670-130135 1.54*13.5
Ethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130111 4.5811.1
2-Hexanone (MBK)g/L5.0 100 2570-130122 3.78122
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130108 2.9110.8
p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130100 4.4010.0
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130110 0.54611.0
Methylene Chloride g/L5.0 10.0 2570-13090.5 2.629.05
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)g/L5.0 100 2570-130122 0.213122
Naphthalene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13072.4 1.397.24
n-Propylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130103 1.8310.3
Styrene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130109 2.1810.9
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13098.7 1.339.87
Tetrachloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130117 6.9211.7
Toluene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130112 1.7611.2
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene g/L1.0 10.0 2570-13088.3 3.578.83
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-13089.3 1.248.93
1,1,1-Trichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130110 1.8811.0
1,1,2-Trichloroethane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130115 1.9011.5
Trichloroethylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130121 3.4012.1
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130114 3.2911.4
1,2,3-Trichloropropane g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130106 1.2410.6
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130102 4.0310.2
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130105 0.94910.5
Vinyl Acetate g/L20 100 2570-13071.4 2.5671.4
Vinyl Chloride g/L0.50 10.0 25 L-0260-140264 4.91*26.4
m+p Xylene g/L1.0 20.0 2570-130112 2.3022.3
o-Xylene g/L0.50 10.0 2570-130110 3.2111.0
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 96.124.0
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 97.724.4
g/L 25.0 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 97.324.3
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
FLAG/QUALIFIER SUMMARY
*QC result is outside of established limits.
Wide recovery limits established for difficult compound.
Wide RPD limits established for difficult compound.
#Data exceeded client recommended or regulatory level
Percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) are determined by the software using values in the
calculation which have not been rounded.
No results have been blank subtracted unless specified in the case narrative section.
RL Reporting Limit is at the level of quantitation (LOQ)
DL Detection Limit is the lower limit of detection determined by the MDL study
MCL Maximum Contaminant Level
ND Not Detected
Detected but below the Reporting Limit (lowest calibration standard); therefore, result is an estimated
concentration (CLP J-Flag).
J
Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery and duplicate recoveries outside of control limits.
Data validation is not affected since all results are "not detected" for associated samples in this batch and bias is
on the high side.
L-02
Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery and/or duplicate recovery are outside of control
limits. Reported value for this compound is likely to be biased on the high side.
L-06
Either laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample or duplicate recovery is outside of control limits, but
the other is within limits. RPD between the two LFB/LCS results is within method specified criteria.
L-07
Elevated reporting limit due to high concentration of target compounds.RL-11
[TOC_1]Flag/Qualifier Summary[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
CertificationsAnalyte
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Analyses included in this Report
SM21-23 6200B in Water
NCAcetone
NCBenzene
NCBromobenzene
NCBromochloromethane
NCBromodichloromethane
NCBromoform
NCBromomethane
NC2-Butanone (MEK)
NCn-Butylbenzene
NCsec-Butylbenzene
NCtert-Butylbenzene
NCCarbon Tetrachloride
NCChlorobenzene
NCEthanol
NCChlorodibromomethane
NCChloroethane
NCChloroform
NCChloromethane
NC2-Chlorotoluene
NC4-Chlorotoluene
NC1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
NC1,2-Dichlorobenzene
NC1,3-Dichlorobenzene
NC1,4-Dichlorobenzene
NCDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
NC1,1-Dichloroethane
NC1,2-Dichloroethane
NC1,1-Dichloroethylene
NCcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
NCtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
NC1,2-Dichloropropane
NC1,3-Dichloropropane
NC2,2-Dichloropropane
NC1,1-Dichloropropene
NCcis-1,3-Dichloropropene
NCtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
NCDiisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
NCEthylbenzene
NC2-Hexanone (MBK)
NCIsopropylbenzene (Cumene)
NCp-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
NCMethyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
NCMethylene Chloride
NC4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
NCNaphthalene
NCn-Propylbenzene
NCStyrene
[TOC_1]Certifications[TOC]
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
CertificationsAnalyte
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Analyses included in this Report
SM21-23 6200B in Water
NC1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
NCTetrachloroethylene
NCToluene
NC1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
NC1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
NC1,1,1-Trichloroethane
NC1,1,2-Trichloroethane
NCTrichloroethylene
NCTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
NC1,2,3-Trichloropropane
NC1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
NC1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
NCVinyl Acetate
NCVinyl Chloride
NCm+p Xylene
NCo-Xylene
Con-Test, a Pace Environmental Laboratory, operates under the following certifications and accreditations:
Code Description Number Expires
652North Carolina Div. of Water QualityNC 12/31/2022