NCD980602163_20021104_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_No. 112 - Final Verification Confirmation Sampling Plan-OCR

TRANSMITTAL COVER PAGE
WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL DETOXIFICATION PROJECT
Shaw Project #827062
Submitted By: Shaw E&I -200 Horizon Center Boulevard, Trenton, New Jersey 08691
Transmittal Number (chronological sequence): 68
Transmittal Date: 11/4/02
Submittal Register Item Number: ___l1L
Resubmittal: No Yes____,X_
Specification Section: NIA_
Description: Final Verification/ Confirmation Sampling Plan
Drawing/Detail Number: NI A
Subcontractor/Supplier: NI A
Comments: Document being submitted is titled "Sampling and Analysis Plan, covers other items in
addition to final verification and confirmation sampling
Number of Copies Submitted: 6 ( 4 to Earth Tech. 2 directly to Pat Backus)
Number of Copies to be Returned to Contractor 0
Submitter's Name and Signature: _G=ary"-'-W~-~D~u=k=e. ______________ _
Earth Tech Engineer's Receipt Signature: ___________________ _
Comments:
Receipt Date:
Engineer's Approval
Comments:
Reviewer's Signature
Project Manager's Signature
□ A. "Reviewed and approved, no exceptions taken"
□ B. "Reviewed and approved with comments
□ C. "Revise and Resubmit"
Date -------------------------
_______________ D me ________ _
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL DETOXIFICATION PROJECT
WARRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Prepared by:
Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.
200 Horizon Center Boulevard
Trenton, New Jersey
Gary Duke, P.E.
Project Manager
Revision 3
October 28,2002
Shaw E&I Project 827062
NC SCO Project 101440101A
~ Sliaw·-
shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc.
"
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. (Shaw E&I) has prepared this Sampling and Analysis Plan to
guide the sampling and analytical tasks required for the successful remediation of polychlorinated
biphenyl (PCB) contaminated materials at Warren County PCB Landfill, Warrenton, North Carolina.
The site consists primarily of two areas to be excavated, the landfill and the unlined drainage pond, both
of which require post-excavation sampling to confirm that the site cleanup criteria have been met. In
addition, the site includes concrete tanks, sand and carbon from the old leachate treatment system, which
must be sampled to determine disposal options. Treatment processes performed as part of the remediation
activities will create treated soil, treated oil and treated storm water, all of which must be sampled to
confirm that treatment criteria have been met. Other wastes that will be created or exposed by remediation
activities include oversize material from the landfill, landfill liner, sand and carbon from the stormwater
treatment system, used PPE and other miscellaneous debris, all of which must be sampled to determine
disposal options.
2.0 SAMPLE LOCATION AND FREQUENCY
The landfill will be divided into 50 foot x 50 foot grids. Each grid will be sampled in nine (9) locations,
and then composited. The drainage pond will be divided into 20 foot x 20 foot grids. One grab sample
will be submitted from each grid. Treated soils will be sampled hourly from the belt to the storage bin,
while a single bin is being filled. Once the bin is full, all samples from that bin will be placed in a
decontaminated mixing bowl and composited. Treated water will be sampled every million gallons.
Treated oil samples will sampled every batch. Table 1 contains the frequency for all anticipated samples.
3.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
A summary table of required analyses may be found in Table 2. Required reporting limits are found in
Table 3. Sample containers, preservatives and holding times are given in Table 4.
3.1 Post-Excavation Soils
Soil samples will be collected using chemically inert, disposable sample scoops. The same scoop may be
used for all grab samples making a single composite sample.
3.1.1 Landfill
The landfill will be divided into 50 foot x 50 foot grids as shown in Figure 1, which is located at the end
of this document. Materials to be excavated and treated include part of the overlying fill material, the
PCB contaminated material, underlying filter fabric and sand layer and the top 6" of the 60" underlying
clay layer. Once the target depth for each grid has been achieved, nine (9) grab samples will be collected
from zero to three (0 -3) inches, well distributed over the grid. The sampler will determine the exact
location of each sample, although samples will be collected from stained areas, if present. Soil from each
grab sample location will be placed in a decontaminated stainless steel mixing bowl for homogenization
after all grab samples in a grid are collected, to create a composite sample for analysis. The sample jar
will be filled with the composited soil for laboratory analysis. One in ten composite samples will be
submitted in duplicate. The location of each grab sample that makes up a composite will be marked by a
stake. If the composite sample results are below the project's 1.0 mg/kg (ppm) total PCBs limit , then the
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3 Warren County PCB Landfill October 28, 2002
~ Sliaw"
Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
location and elevation of these stakes will be surveyed before the area is backfilled so that a permanent
record of the location of the final verification samples can be maintained.
Most landfill samples will be analyzed for PCBs by SW-846 Method 8082 by the primary laboratory for
this project, Toxicon Corp of Bedford, MA. Recognizing that occasional problems with turnaround time
may occur, especially with a lab located this far from the site, Shaw has also arranged for Triangle
Laboratories of Durham, NC to act as a backup lab for time-sensitive samples (landfill excavation and
treated soil) if needed. Triangle does not perform analyses by method 8082, but use either high or low
resolution versions of Method 680. Low resolution has been requested by Shaw as it is still sensitive
enough (total PQL for sum of mono-through deca-chlorinated PCBs <0.083ppm, individual PQLs range
from 1.67 to 8.33ppb, per 8/13/02 call to Triangle) to confirm compliance with the project's 1.0 mg/kg
(ppm) total PCBs limit, and has a faster turnaround time.
If any grid sample result is greater than or equal to 1. 0 mg/kg (ppm) total PCBs then excavation will
continue in 6 inch lifts until the sample concentration is less than 1.0 mg/kg (ppm) total PCBs.
3.1.2 Unlined Drainage Pond
The unlined drainage pond will be emptied and divided into 20 foot x 20 foot grids in the area found to
contain PCBs at concentrations greater than 0.2 mg/kg during earlier sampling. Once the target depth of
6 inches for each grid has been reached, one (1) sample will be collected from zero to three (0 -3) inches
for PCB analysis by Method 8082. The sampler will determine the exact location of each sample,
although samples will be collected from stained areas, if present. One in ten samples will be collected in
duplicate.
The location of each grab sample will be marked by a stake. If the composite sample results are below the
project's 1.0 mg/kg (ppm) total PCBs limit , then the location and elevation of these stakes will be
surveyed so that a permanent record of the location of the final verification samples can be maintained.
If any grid sample result is greater than or equal to 1. 0 mg/kg (ppm) total PCBs then excavation will
continue in 6 inch lifts until the sample concentration is less than 1.0 mg/kg (ppm) total PCBs.
Note that the first round of post-excavation samples were taken from the pond on 7 /23/02 and one of the
two samples (WCLF-DP-001) came back at 0.25 ppm. As a result, the corresponding area was
reexcavated on 7 /31 and res amp led on 8/6/02, prior to the 8/7 /02 progress meeting at which it was agreed
to use the 1.0 ppm limit instead of the 0.2 ppm limit assumed by Shaw prior to then.
3.2 Treated Soils
3.2.1 Treated Soil Analysis During Performance Demonstration Test
Treated soils will be sampled and analyzed during the Performance Demonstration Test in accordance
with the QAPP prepared by Environmental Quality Management, Inc. (EQM) under a contract with the
USEP A. This document is dated December, 2001 and was transmitted by EQM as Final, Revision 0,
under a cover letter dated December 27, 2001 to Mr. Terrence Lyons of USEPA with copy to Pat Backus
of NCDENR, copy subsequently provided by Shaw to Earthtech.
3.2.2 Treated Soil Analysis by Shaw (all except during PD test)
Verification sampling of thermally treated soil will be performed by taking one grab sample per operating
hour from the surface of an active face of the treated soil stockpile (an area where the discharge conveyor
is dropping fresh material as the sample is being taken). Each hourly grab sample will immediately be
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3 Warren County PCB Landfill
2
November 4, 2002
~ Sllaw'"
Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
placed in a stainless steel mixing bowl. The bowl will be covered between samplings. Sampling will
continue until the bin is full, at which point the soil in the bowl will be thoroughly homogenized to create
a composite sample for laboratory analysis.
Most treated soil samples will be analyzed for PCBs by SW-846 Method 8082 by the primary laboratory
for this project, Paradigm Analytical Laboratories, Inc. of Wilmington, NC. Recognizing that occasional
problems with turnaround time may occur, Shaw has also arranged for Toxicon Corp of Bedford, MA and
Southern Testing and Research Laboratories, Inc of Wilson, NC to act as backup laboratories. Shaw has
also arranged for Triangle Laboratories of Durham, NC to act as a backup lab for time-sensitive samples
(landfill excavation and treated soil) if needed. Triangle does not perform analyses by method 8082, but
use either high or low resolution versions of Method 680. Low resolution has been requested by Shaw as
it is still sensitive enough to confirm compliance with the project's 0.2 mg/kg (ppm) total PCBs limit (see
note in section 3 .1.1 ), and has a faster turnaround time.
In order for treated soil to be considered as treated in accordance with the contract performance standards
the analytical results for any batch must not exceed 0.5 ppm (500 ppb) PCBs AND accepting it must not
raise the weighted average for all accepted batches above 0.2 ppm (200 ppb PCBs. Batches which are
reported as non-detect (ND) or below quantitation limits (BQL) will be recorded as containing PBCs at a
value equal to half of the highest quantitation limit for any congener. A sample form for recording this
information and approvals by Shaw and EarthTech is included at the end ofthis document.
3.3 Treated Water
One (1) grab sample will be collected for every one million gallons of storm water treated on-site. The
sample will be collected from the sample port on the discharge side of the trailing treatment unit. Water
will be allowed to flow through the port for a minute prior to sampling, to ensure "old" water will not be
sampled. The purge water will be collected and placed with the untreated water. The samples will be
analyzed for PCBs by Method 8082.
The results of the treated water analysis will be used to determine the possible need to change the media
in the sand and/or carbon vessels in order to ensure that all treated water is maintained at concentrations at
or below 0.5ug/L (ppb) PCBs.
3.4 Treated Oil
3.4.1 Treated Oil Analysis During Performance Demonstration Test
Treated oil will be sampled and analyzed during the Performance Demonstration Test in accordance with
the QAPP prepared by Environmental Quality Management, Inc. (EQM) under a contract with the
USEP A. This document is dated December, 2001 and was transmitted by EQM as Final, Revision 0,
under a cover letter dated December 27, 2001 to Mr. Terrence Lyons of USEPA with copy to Pat Backus
of NCDENR, copy subsequently provided by Shaw to Earthtech.
3.4.2 Treated Oil Analysis by Shaw (all except during PD test)
One grab sample will be collected per treatment batch of treated oil. The samples will be analyzed for pH
and for PCBs by Method 8082.
Treated oil with concentrations greater than or equal to 2.0 mg/L (ppm) PCBs will be retreated or
disposed of offsite at a TSCA approved disposal facility.
3.5 Disposal Analyses
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3 Warren County PCB Landfill
3
November 4, 2002
~ Sliaw"
Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
Anticipated materials for disposal include sand and carbon from both preexisting and new water filtration
systems, concrete tanks for the preexisting filters, filter fabric from the landfill, and used PPE, debris, etc.
from the remedial action. Sampling and analytical requirements for each waste stream are described
below. The analytical parameters were selected based on the requirements of the disposal facilities
selected for use on this project, which are identified in submittal register item #4 7, transmittal #64 and 65,
for non-TS CA and TSCA wastes, respectively.
3.5.1 Sand and Carbon
Sand and carbon samples will be collected from the top three (3) inches of the respective preexisting
filters using chemically inert, disposable sample scoops. These samples will be grab samples, and will be
collected for PCBs (method 8082), RCRA metals (Methods 6010B & 7471A) and benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers (BTEX, Method 802 lB).
Newly installed filter cells will be sampled as replaced, or at the end of the job, whichever comes first.
These cells will be sampled in the same manner as the preexisting cells and analyzed for the same
parameters.
3.5.2 Concrete
Concrete tanks exist that housed the preexisting filters. The inside of each tank will be sampled by
chipping the concrete and placing it in a sample container for PCB analysis (Method 8082). The chisel
will be decontaminated before sampling each tank.
3.5.3 Filter Fabric
If necessary, filter fabric will be sampled by cutting approximately one (1) inch squares for analysis.
These squares will be collected from random locations and placed in a sample container for PCB analysis
by Method 8082.
3.5.4 Haul Road Stone
Prior to removing any portion of the haul road or ramp, that portion will be sampled and analyzed for
PCBs at a minimum frequency of 1 sample per 100 CY of haul road stone. Since the thickness of the
stone may vary considerably, Shaw will first excavate a small test pit every 50 ft along the centerline of
the portion of the road to be removed to determine the average depth. From this and the width it can be
calculated how many linear feet of road will constitute 100 cy (for 16 ft wide road with stone 8" deep the
result is approx 250 ft). Five (5) grab samples will be collected from the full depth of the stone at
locations equally spaced along the calculated length. . Soil from each grab sample location will be placed
in a decontaminated stainless steel mixing bowl for homogenization to create a composite sample for
analysis. The sample jar will be filled with the composited stone for laboratory analysis. One in ten
composite samples will be submitted in duplicate.
If the sample result is greater than or equal to 0.2 mg/kg (ppm) total PCBs, then that portion of the road
stone will be disposed of offsite at a subtitle D landfill. It the result is less than 0.2 mg/kg (ppm) total
PCBs then the stone will be stockpiled and placed in the unlined pond at the end of the project.
3.5.5 PPE and Various Debris
Disposal characterization samples will be collected for all applicable waste streams. Used PPE will be
cut into pieces prior to placement in the appropriate sample containers. All effort will be made to ensure
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3 Warren County PCB Landfill
4
November 4, 2002
~ Sliaw·
Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
that representative portions of used PPE are placed in each container. PPE samples will be analyzed for
full TCLP, PCBs and RCRA characteristics.
Debris will be placed in a decontaminated mixing bowl and homogenized, if appropriate, prior to
placement in the appropriate sample containers. Debris samples will be analyzed for full TCLP, PCBs
and RCRA characteristics.
3.6 Untreated Soil Analyses for Dioxins and Furans
Untreated soils will also be analyzed periodically for dioxins and furans (reported as TCDD TEQ), in
addition to the dioxin testing which is to be done as part of the Performance Demonstration test. This will
serve to confirm historical data as well as the results of the PD test as to the low levels of dioxin in the
untreated soil. Since the PD test is expected to confirm previous results from similar thermal treatment
units showing that they do not create dioxin it can be inferred that if the untreated soil contains dioxin at
levels below the project standard of 0.2 ug/kg (ppb) TEQ then the untreated soils will also be at or below
that level. The reason for sampling untreated soils is that it is more likely that dioxins will be found at
quantifiable levels in the untreated soil.
These periodic samples will be taken monthly, beginning the month after the full 3 run PD test. The
samples will be taken as a composite of five single point grab samples taken from the stockpile of
screened untreated soil stored under the pole barn. The project standard for total dioxins/furans reported
as TCDD TEQ is 0.2 ug/kg (ppb).
4.0 SAMPLE NUMBERING
4.1 Landfill Post-Excavation Samples
Landfill post-excavation samples will be numbered using the format WCLF-LF-GG-N-O where:
LF designates landfill post-excavation sample
GG letter and number designating grid location per map included as Figure 1
N number designating excavation sequence represented by sample, use 0 for bottom of
initial excavation, 1 for after first reexcavation, etc.
0 optional identifier, used to differentiate samples if required, example would be the use of
D to designate a duplicate sample
4.2 Treated Soil Samples
Treated soil samples will be numbered using the format WCLF-ST-L-NNN-O where:
ST designates soil (treated) sample
L number designating treated soil bin that sample represents
NNN sequential batch number
0 optional identifier, used to differentiate samples if required, example could be the use of
D to designate a duplicate sample
4.3 Other Samples
All other samples will be given a unique number in order to identify the location the sample was collected
from, as shown below:
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3
WCLF -LL -NNN-O
W3JTen County PCB Landfill
5
November 4, 2002
~ Sliaw ··
Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
where: WCLF -Warren County Landfill
LL-Location of Sample Area
• DP -Drainage Pond
• OS -Disposal (sand, carbon, concrete, filter fabric , haul road stone, PPE, debris)
• OT -Oil, treated
• OU -Oil, untreated
• SU -Soil, untreated (primarily for dioxin analyses per section 3.6)
• WT -Water, Treated
NNN -Consecutive sample number beginning at 00 I
0 Optional identifier, used to differentiate samples if required, example could be the use of
D to designate a duplicate sample
5.0 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Documentation of sample custody following collection is accomplished using a standard
Chain-of-Custody Record. This document traces possession of every sample from the time of collection
through sample analysis.
In general, chain of custody protocols follow those outlined in USEP A guidelines. This documentation
begins immediately following sample collection and proper labeling. The chain-of-custody record
provides information on the sealing of samples, the sample number, sample description, date and time of
collection, number of containers for the sample, type of analysis requested, and any pertinent remarks are
entered onto the chain of custody record form. The chain-of-custody record form also documents the
condition of sample containers upon their receipt from the support laboratory. This form is completed
using indelible black ink.
6.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Final analytical data report will be include only the analytical results for the samples and field / laboratory
blanks. Analytical results will be compared to the applicable site clean-up or treatment criteria for PCBs,
or the appropriate disposal guidelines.
Landfi ll Excavation
Draina e Pond
Soil, Treated (PCBs)
Soil, Untreated (dioxin
TEQ)
Water, Treated
Oil, Treated
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3
1 composite I 2500 sq ft Sand Filter
1 ·ab / 400 s ft Carbon Filter
1 com osite / stora e bin Concrete Tank
Monthly after PD test Filter Fabric
allons Haul Road Stone
Used PPB/debris
Warren County PCB Landfill
6
1 com osite I 100 c
1 composite / waste stream
add'l PCB as necessary
November 4, 2002
~ Sliaw -
shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
Landfill Excavation PCBs 8082 50 5
Landfill Excavation PCBs (by Triangle Labs) MM680LRMS 5 0
Drainage Pond PCBs 8082 10 1
Soil, Treated PCBs 8082 150 15
Soil, Treated PCBs (by Triangl~ Labs) MM680LRMS 5 0
Soil Untreated Dioxins/furans as TEQ 8280A/8290 10 1
Water, Treated PCBs 8082 10 1
Oil, Treated PCBs& H 8082 120 12
Sand Filter PCBs,BTEX, 8082, 8021 , 7 0
Carbon Filter Total TCLP Metals 6010/7471 7 0
Concrete Tank PCBs 8082 2 0
Filter Fabric PCBs 8082 0
Haul Road Stone PCBs 8082 3 0
Used PPE/Debris Full TCLP 1311/8260, 8270, 8081, 0
-------------------------------______ 8151, 6010/7470 ------
RCRA __ _1010 mod, 9045, Sec 7 ___ -------------------------------PCBs 8082
-------------------------------As Needed) PCBs 8082 5 0
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3 Warren County PCB Landfill November 4, 2002
7
~ Sliaw"·
Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
Dioxins / furans TEQ
Benzene o-Cresol
Toluene m-Cresol
Ethylbenzene p-Cresol
X lenes Cresol
TCLP Volatiles 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene 0.5 mg/L 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 mg/L Hexachlorobenzene
Chlorobenzene l 00.0 mg/L Hexachlorobutadiene
Chloroform 6.0 mg/L Hexachloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 mg/L Nitrobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 mg/L Pentachlorophenol
Methylethyl Ketone 200.0 mg/L Pyridine
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 mg/L 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
Trichloroethylene 0.5 mg/L 2,4,6-Trichloro henol
Vinyl Chloride 0.2 mg/L TCLP Metals lf---"-----------+------"'----;1
TCLP Herbicides/Pesticides Arsenic
Chlordane 0.03 mg/L Barium
2,4-D 10.0 mg/L Cadmium
Endrin 0.02 mg/L Chromium
Heptachlor (and its Epoxide) 0.008 mg/L Lead
Lindane 04 mg/L Mercury
Methoxychlor 10.0 mg/L Selenium
Toxaphene 0.5 mg/L Silver
2,4,5-TP (silvex) 1.0 mg/L
l#:¥imiw t 11¥wr~!!'.t r
lttt!itK>
200.0 mg/L
2000mg/L
200.0 mg/L
200.0 mg/L
7.5 mg/L
0.13 mg/L
0.13 mg/L
0.5 mg/L
3.0 mg/L
2.0 mg/L
100.0 mg/L
5.0 mg/L
400.0 mg/L
2.0m L
5.0 mg/L
100.0 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
5.0 mg/L
5.0 mg/L
0.2 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
5.0m L
:::-:,:,•-:.:-
Note 1 to Table 3: Maximum allowable practical quantitation limits were established based on project
specifications for PCBs and dioxin TEQ or on disposal facility criteria for other parameters such as
TCLP. No limit was established for BTEX as the disposal facility requires this information to establish a
waste profile but did not preset limits. Analytical methods and laboratory capabilities will generally result
in actual PQLs below the allowable maximums.
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3 Warren County PCB Landfill November 4, 2002
8
~ Stiaw -
shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
: : • 1::IIP:l•t t : SAMPLE (IONTAINEBS. PRES.ERY:AllVE.S A:N» HOLDING TIM.ES) ❖ • ?i:iiltvi&h > • Hfl.:Hmm ] Miiib: ••• t.liiiU(ffiijij J Pri~iril.ivlt$) •• Qhffllnf Tfiil ?
PCBs
PCBs
Triangle Labs
Dioxin/furans
TEQ
Dioxin/furans
TEQ
Triangle Labs
BTEX
TCLP voes
TCLP SVOCs
TCLP PIH (2)
TCLP Metals
8082
MM680
LRMS
8290
8280A
8021
1311/8260
1311/8270
1311/8081/
8151
1311/6010/
7470
Ignitability 1010
Reactivity SW846 Ch7
Solid
Liquid
Solid
Solid
Solid
Solid
Solid
Solid
250 mL Glass w/
Teflon®-lined
cap
1000 mL Glass
w/ Teflon®-
lined cap
250 mL Glass w/
Teflon®-lined
cap
125 mL Glass w/
Teflon®-lined
cap
125 mL Glass w/
Teflon®-lined
cap
3-EnCore
samplers
125 mL Glass w/
Teflon®-lined
cap
2-500 mL Glass
w/ Teflon®-
lined cap
4°c
4°c
4°c
4° C
4°c
4°c
4° C
4° C
14/40 (1)
7/40
14/40
30/45
30/45
14
14/14
14 until TCLP
extraction
7 until prep
extraction
___ 40 _until analysis __ _
6 mo /6 mo
___ mercury 28 /_28 ___ _
ASAP
C01rnsivity 9040 ~==6===='1===='========'=====================11 extraction / days to analysis ( except where noted)
· es and herbicides
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3 Warren County PCB Landfill
9
November 4, 2002
~ Stiaw -
shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
------18\ --------...... -. .-~. a
~
D r ~ - --~ ---~ -/
I / 7
"' /
C I I --
I -I I ---
I I I I
I I I
B
I I )-----I I -
~
A I l! "-J f--- -f--- -f--~
-- ---- - - - --_J
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The 50 foot by 50 foot excavation grids are shown above. The contaminated area footprint
is 420 ft by 176 ft. The grid area measures 450 ft by 200 ft, thus allowing for possible expansion due to post-
excavation sampling.
WruTen County PCB Landfill-post-excavation sampling grid
Sampling and Analysis Plan -Figure 1
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3 Warren County PCB Landfill
10
November 4, 2002
~ Sliaw···
Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY,
REMOVE IT AND INSERT 1 PAGE PRINTOUT OF
EXCEL FILE: batch form 2.xls
Shaw Project 827062SAP-Rev 3 Warren County PCB Landfill
11
November 4, 2002
Warren County PCB Landfill Detoxification Project NC SCO Project ID#010440101A
Shaw E&I Project #827062
Treated Soil Batch Weight and Treatment Certification Form
Sequential Batch #: Treated soil bin location #:
Treated tonnage information
Date batch completed: Time completed: Belt Scale reading: tons
Date batch started: Time started: Belt Scale reading: tons
Residuals Recycled tons
Reject material placed into bin# Total Reject Mt'I tons
Calculated net tons for this batch: 0
Sampling and confirmation analysis information
Note, sample ID# format is WCLF-ST-LL-NNN, where:
Shaw sample ID#: ST=soil treatment, LL = location (bin number for treated soil),
NNN=sequential batch #, X=optional extra identifier
for example, could use X=2 to designate a duplicate sample
Name of lab performing analysis:
Laboratory report #: Report Date: Attach copy of report to this sheet
Analytical results: mg/kg {ppm) PCBs Note: 1 mg/kg = 1,000 ug/kg
1 ppm= 1,000 ppb
ug/kg (ppb) PCBs
Acceptance criteria: to be considered as treated in accordance with the contract performance standards
the analytical results for the batch must not exceed 0.5 ppm (500 ppb) PCBs AND
accepting it must not raise the weighted average for all accepted soils above 0.2 ppm
(200 ppb) PCBs. Any batch that does not meet both criteria must be reprocessed.
Approval information and signatures
Based on the analytical information provided above, this batch should be considered:
I I Acceptable, can be transferred to clean stockpile or backfilled.
I I Acceptable, but contractor chooses to reprocess.
I I Unacceptable, must be returned to pad #1 for reprocessing.
for Shaw Environmental, Inc. {prime contractor):
Print name:
Date:
Signature:
for EarthTech (owner's representative):
Print name:
Date:
Signature:
file name for blank form: batch form 100802.xls
. •' Warren County PCB Landfill Detoxification Project NC SCO Project ID#010440101A Shaw project #827062 Treated Soll Batch Weight and Treatment Certification Log A B C D E F G H I J K L M N 0 p Q R s T u V w Results of PCB analysis approved Weighted Batch# Bin# Date Time Date Time Belt scale Belt scale Belt Residuals Net tons Shaw Name of Lab Lab (mg/kg=ppm) Approved, Rejected, Total tons Total tons batch Running Avg PCB complete complete start start complete start scale recycled for batch sample# lab report# report or0.5 of BQL can be must be approved rejected tons•PCB Total of =VIS (tons) (tons) net tons (tons) date must be <0.5 backfilled retreated =K•P col U must be <0.2 1 1 08/24/02 20:15 08/23/02 16:45 354.22 30.61 323.61 1.75 321.86 01-001 Toxikon 0208307-01A 08/24/02 1.1 1 321.86 0.0000 0.0000 #DIV/0! 2 2 08127/02 18:30 08/24/02 20:15 780.39 354.22 426.17 15.75 410.42 02-002 Toxikon 208306 08/29/02 0.91 1 732.28 0.0000 0.0000 #DIV/0! 3 3 08/29/02 20:12 08/27/02 18:30 1,182.98 780.39 402.59 5.30 397.29 03-003D Toxikon 209086 09/11/02 6 1 1,129.57 0.0000 0.0000 #DIV/0! 4 4 08/30/02 4:05 08/29/02 20:12 1,269.07 1,182.98 86.09 1.80 84.29 04-004 Toxikon 209087 09/11/02 0.0285 1 84.29 1,129.57 2.4023 2.4023 0.029 5 1/6 07/09/02 18:30 09/06/02 16:27 1,538.22 1 276.72 261.50 8.58 252.92 06-008 Paradiom 52679 09/17/02 0.98 1 84.29 1,382.49 0.0000 2.4023 0.029 6 2 This was small amount of material returned to the oole barn 01-006 Toxikon 020987-03A 09/11/02 3.2 1 84.29 1,382.49 0.0000 2.4023 0.029 7 2 09/12/021 11:16 09/11/02 13:23 I 1,904.07 1,544.99 359.08 5.93 353.15 02-007 Paradiom 52519 09/13/02 0.55 1 84.29 1,735.64 0.0000 2.4023 0.029 8 Batch 8 was created when batch 5 was moved from bin 1 to bin 6 -Results are shown under batch 5 84.29 1,735.64 0.0000 2.4023 0.029 9 4 09/13/02 18:57 09/12/02 11:16 2,403.90 1,904.07 499.83 23.04 476.79 04-009 Paradiom 52680 09/17/02 0.17 1 561.08 1,735.64 81.0543 83.4566 0.149 10 3 09/14/02 12:18 09/13/02 19:10 2,652.76 2,403.90 248.86 8.25 240.61 03-010 Paradigm 52681 09/17/02 0.19 1 801.69 1,735.64 45.7159 129.1725 0.161 11 3 09/24/02 14:04 09/23/02 20:30 2,894.67 2,652.76 241.91 9.55 232.36 03-011 Paradiam 53245 09/25/02 0.18 1 1,034.05 1,735.64 41.8255 170.9980 0.165 12 2 09/25/02 14:06 09/24/02 14:04 3,232.12 2,894.67 337.45 12.60 324.85 02-012 Paradigm 53346 09/26/02 0.1 1 1,358.90 1,735.64 32.4850 203.4830 0.150 13 1 09/26/02 5:42 09/25/02 14:06 3,476.49 3,232.12 244.37 23.00 221.37 01-013 Paradiam 53477 09/27/02 0.0165 1 1,580.27 1,735.64 3.6526 207.1356 0.131 14 3 09127/02 14:25 09/26/02 13:45 3,839.83 3,476.49 363.34 24.82 338.52 03-014 Paradigm 53540 09/30/02 0.28 1 1,918.79 1,735.64 94.7856 301.9212 0.157 SHAW INVOICE #19 FOR PERIOD THROUGH 9/30/02 COVERED THROUGH BATCH #14, TOTAL INVOICED TONS TO DATE= 1,918.79. 1,918.79 1,735.64 0.0000 301.9212 0.157 13ICORRECTION TO BATCH 13 ACTUAL RECYCLED TONS =23.95 I 0.95 I (0.95)1 0.0165 1 1,917.84 1,735.64 -0.0157 301.9055 0.157 CORRECTION ON LINE ABOVE WAS MADE AFTER SHAW INVOICE #19 WAS PREPARED ADJUSTMENT TO BE REFLECTED ON INVOICE #20 FOR OCTOBER WORK. 1,917.84 1,735.64 0.0000 301.9055 0.157 15 2 10/01/02 14:15 09/30/02 10:15 4,248.00 3,839.83 408.17 8.88 399.30 1917.84 1,735.64 0.0000 301.9055 0.157 16 1 10/02/02 11:07 10/01/02 14:15 4,582.00 4,248.00 334.00 8.23 325.77 01-016 Paradiam 53834 10/03/02 0.017 1 2,243.61 1,735.64 5.5381 307.4436 0.137 17 3 10/03/02 10:10 10/02/02 11:07 4,947.30 4,582.00 365.30 6.37 358.93 03-017 Paradiqm 53970 10/04/02 0.017 1 2,602.54 1,735.64 6.1018 313.5454 0.120 18 4 10/04/02 14:37 10/03/02 10:10 5,405.90 4,947.30 458.60 8.60 450.00 04-018 Paradiam 54090 10/07/02 0.06 1 3,052.54 1,735.64 27.0000 340.5454 0.112 19 1 10/05/02 6:30 10/04/02 14:37 5,634.49 5,405.90 228.59 4.26 224.33 01-019 Paradigm 54091 10/07/02 0.017 1 3,276.87 1,735.64 3.8136 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3 276.87 1 735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3 276.87 1 735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3 276.87 1 735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3 276.87 1 735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1 735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 3,276.87 1,735.64 0.0000 344.3590 0.105 TOTALS 5,589.46 177.65 5,411.81 3,276.87 1,735.64 GRAND TOTAL NET TONS OF TREATED SOIL 5,411.81 <---VALUES IN THESE TWO CELLS MUST MATCH -------> 5,012.51 file name for blank form. batch tog form 100802
D C B A WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL LANDFILL GRIDS ~ >I 35' li.:c-<-1 'r,~J--T--r-·1 I I 0.100 I <0035/-1:~~~/l r.. . . . _ ,,,,,,,, _ (<0.039) LL 1 \.. __ .. ___ _ '1-·· ! I r--•-h--~ 2 -·· 3 4 5 I <@.040 <0.035 I i <0.036 <0.038 [0.033] (0.33) <0.040 [16.4] (0.10) --.. ~.--<~~;-~6~,:~j~I ----------rfl".'68) . \V• "-6 7 8 9 Notes: Grids in columns 1 through 8 are moved 7 feet east. Grids in column 9 are modified to actual landfill area. All sample results are PCBs in mg/kg (ppm). [19] -Samples collected from the sand in the wall beyond the limits of the initial excavation. (0.68) -Second set of PCB samples collected after overburden and sand from the wall above all the subject grids was removed. NOTTO SCALE
--........~~ 7 i::: ' r-,_'),_J i [) I ' T·:-/ I I ' I I I I I E; I I L. I -~ . l I I ' . -t , I I I /\ I ==--1~~_l__,_=:::___i_---, ,.''-'',, I i I ~ ;1 ,,~, // ... .3 4 h, ·,. __ ) r::~ ,.___, 7 ·~=j c1 r, \,~i ·~_) Re\.'·. "1: GRIDS I~~ COLUlvH··lS 1 THROUGH e ARE f..M)VED 7 FEET EAST 1~RIDS lt•-.J C:OLU(•.At\.j 9 .A.RE MODIFIED TO .A.CTIJ.A.L Ui,J,~DFILL .A.RE.A. LANDFILL GRIDS l. i h) ~~, ,~J
Remediation Narrative for Column 9
The first set of confinnation samples on column 9 were taken on 2/26/03 when grids A
and B were cleared. The remaining two grids were sampled on 3/3/03 after they were
cleared. As shown in the table below all the grids were BQL.
Sample Date Sample Number PPM PCB
2/26/03 WCLF-LF-A9-0 BQL @ 0.041
2/26/03 WCLF-LF-B9-0 BQL @ 0.040
3/3/03 WCLF-LF-C9-0 BQL @ 0.038
3/3/03 WCLF-LF-D9-0 BQL ~ 0.040
At the same time as grids C9 and D9 were sampled for the first time Shaw noticed th at
there was sand in the wall of the landfill that was beyond the limits of excavation as
shown on the drawings. A sample of the sand was taken out of grid A9 and designated
sample WCLF-LF-A9-1. The analytical result is shown below.
Sam le Date Sam le Number PPM PCB
3/3/03 WCLF-LF-A9-l 19
The sand in the wall of grid A9 was hot. Some sand was also noticed in the wall of the
excavation around tbe perimeter of the other landfill grids. Samples of the sand were
then taken from the walls above additional grids as shown in the table below. The
sampl e number shows the wall above the grid where the sample was taken (west or south
wall).
Sample Date Sample Number PPM PCB
3/5/03 WCLF-LF-A8-0-Sandwest BQL @ 0.029
3/5/03 WCLF-LF-B9-0-Sandsouth 16.4
3/5/03 W CLF-LF-D9-0-Sandsouth 4.7
3/5/03 WCLF-LF-C9-0-Sandsouth BQL @ 0.033
The overburden was removed and the sand was removed from the wall above all the
subj ect grids. Since the contaminated excavator had to track over the previously cleaned
grid s to remove the sand, another layer of clay was removed from the grids and they were
res ampled . The results of th e second round of sampling is shown below:
Sample Date Sample Number PPM PCB
3/9/03 WCLF-LF-A9-2 0.68
3/9/03 WCLF-LF-B9-1 0.10
3/10/03 WCLF-LF-C9-1 0.33
3/9/03 WCLF-LF-D9-l BQL (ciJ 0.039
These samples show that the grids meet the PCB sampling limit of 1 ppm. The sample
points were surveyed on 3/13/03.
. '
Remediation Narrative for Column 8
After removing the filter fabric and sand from the bottom of column 8 the first set of grid
samples were taken on 3/3/03. Results are shown below.
Sample Date Sample Number PPM PCB
3/12/03 WCLF-LF-A8-2 0.33
3/12/03 WCLF-LF-B8-1 BQL (a), 0.036
3/12/03 WCLF-LF-C8-1 BQL (a), 0.035
3/12/03 WCLF-LF-D8-1 BQL @ 0.035
These samples show that the grids meet the PCB sampling limit of 1 ppm. The sample
points were surveyed on 3/13/03.
Remediation Narrative for Column 7
After removing the filter fabric and sand from the bottom of column 7 the first set of grid
samples were taken on 3/17/03. Results are shown below.
Sample Date Sample Number PPM PCB
3/17/03 WCLF-LF-A7-0 BQL (ci), 0.042
3/17/03 WCLF-LF-B7-0 BQL @ 0.040
3/17/03 WCLF-LF-C7-0 BQL @ 0.044
3/17/03 WCLF-LF-D7-0 0.100
These samples show that the grids meet the PCB sampling limit of 1 ppm. The sample
points were surveyed on 3/19/03.