NCD980602163_19970925_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_Final Report - Phase I Pilot-Scale Testing-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TOXIC CHEMICAL
SPECIALISTS
ECO LOGIC -------c:«)
FINAL REPORT
PHASE I PILOT-SCALE TESTING
PCB DESTRUCTION UNIT
ECO LOGIC Process
Gas Phase Chemical Reduction
Testing on Warren County Landfill (North Carolina) Soil
Edgewood Research Development, Engineering Center (ERDEC)
Toxic Test Chamber Facilities,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland
Date: September 25, 1997
Prepared by
ELI Eco Logic International Inc.
(ECO LOGIC)
14 3 Dennis Street
Rockwood, Ontario
Canada NOB 2K0
Submitted to
Mr. Mike Kelly
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
27611-7687
143 Dennis St., Rockwood, Ontario, Canada, NOB 2KO
Rockwood [phone]
Fax [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................... ' ..... ' .. ' ... ''' ... Ill
1.
2.
,.,
.) .
4.
INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Technology Overview .................................................. .
Waste Processing at Commercial-Scale .................................... .
Hydrogen Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.3.1 Industrial Use Of Hydrogen ........................................ 7
1.3.2 Features of the ECO LOGIC Process to Ensure Safe Use of Hydrogen ...... 7
Process Outputs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Summary of Previous Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
PILOT-SCALE TESTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1 Pilot-Scale System Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2 Pilot-Scale Test Operations .............................................. 13
2.2.1 Goals and Objectives of Pilot-Scale Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.2.2 Commissioning Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.2.3 Testing Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.3 Process Operating Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.3.1 TRM Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.3.2 Reactor Operation ............................................... 16
2.3.3 Scrubber Operation .............................................. 16
2.4 Deviations from Test Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.5 Sampling and Monitoring Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.5 .1 Sampling Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.5.2 General Sampling/Quality Control Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.5.3 Liquid Sampling ................................................ 20
2.5.4 Soil Sampling .................................................. 20
2.5.5 Gas Sampling .................................................. 20
2.5.6 Process Performance Monitoring Via On-Line Instrumentation ........... 20
TEST RESULTS ............................................................. 22
3.1 Chemical Analysis of System Inputs and Outputs ............................ 22
3 .2 Discussion of Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3 .2.1 PCB Destruction and Removal Efficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.2.2 PCB Desorption Efficiency in the TRM .............................. 25
3 .2.3 PCDDs and PCDFs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.2.4 TCLP ......................................................... 28
3.2.5 Comparison of Test Results to Target Performance Goals ............... 28
3.2.6 Comparison of PCBs and TEQs in System Outputs to Regulatory Criteria .. 29
APPLICATION TO FULL-SCALE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.1 Ability to Accommodate High Water Content ............................... 29
4.2 Viability of Commercial-Scale Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4.3 Scale-up Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1
4.4 Capabilities to Provide Full-Scale Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
4.5 Economic Estimates for Full-Scale Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
Table 9
Table 10
Table 11
Table 12
Table 13
Table 14
Table 15
Table 16
Table 17
Table 18
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page ii
LIST OF TABLES
TREATABILITY-SCALE THERMAL REDUCTION MILL RESULTS ........... 9
ST ACK TEST DAT A FOR CONfMERCIAL-SCALE
TREATMENT OF DDT AND PCBs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 O
SUMMARY OF DRE AND DE VALUES FOR PCBS AND CBS AT GMCL . . . . . . 11
PILOT-SCALE STARTUP AND SHUTDOWN PROCEDURES ................ 14
MASS OF SCREENED AND OVERSIZE MATERIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
SUMMARY OF WARREN COUNTY LANDFILL SOIL TEST RES UL TS . . . . . . . 17
SUMMARY OF SAMPLING PROGRAM FOR WARREN COUNTY
LANDFILL SOIL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN UNTREATED SOIL (S 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN TREATED SOIL ( S5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SCRUBBER EFFLUENT
(PRE-TERTIARY TREATMENT)(S2) .................................... 23
CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SCRUBBER EFFLUENT
(POST-TERTIARY TREATMENT) (S4) ................................... 23
CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SCRUBBER EFFLUENT
PARTICULATE (S3 ................................................... 24
CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN PRODUCT GAS (S6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN EXHAUST GAS (S7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES OF PCBS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
PCB DESORPTION EFFICIENCY IN TRM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
SUMMARY OF PCB AND TEQ DA TQA FOR PROCESS OUTPUTS . . . . . . . . . . . 30
TRM SCALE-UP FACTORS FROM PILOT-SCALE TO COMMERCIAL-SCALE . 33
LIST OF FIGURES
ECO LOGIC PROCESS REACTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
COMMERCIAL-SCALE PROCESS REACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
COMMERCIAL-SCALE PROCESS SCHEMA TIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
SCHEMA TIC OF A TYPICAL COMMERCIAL-SCALE SITE LAYOUT . . . . . . . . . 6
SCHEMATIC OF PILOT-SCALE WASTE PROCESSING UNIT ............... 12
PCDD AND PCDF PATTERNS IN RUN 2 UNTREATED AND TREATED SOIL . 27
LIST OF APPENDICES
ONT ARIO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BOARD
HEARING DECISION DOCUMENT
PROCESS DAT A LOG SHEETS
CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF ON-LINE DAT A
ANALYTICAL DAT A SETS FOR PILOT TEST RUNS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page iii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The ECO LOGIC Process is a mobile, gas-phase chemical reduction process with demonstrated experience
in the destruction of high and low strength organic wastes such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDDs and
PCDFs), hexachlorinated wastes, organophosphorus pesticides, chemical warfare agents, and other organic
compounds. The Process involves the gas-phase reduction of organic compounds at temperatures of
approximately 850°C and ambient pressure. Chlorinated hydrocarbons such as PCBs and PCDD/Fs are
chemically reduced to methane and hydrochloric acid, while non-chlorinated compounds, such as PAHs, are
reduced to methane and minor amounts of other light hydrocarbons. All outputs from the Process, including
product gas, are held and tested to determine their compliance with regulatory criteria, prior to reuse in the
system or disposal. The ECO LOGIC Process has undergone regulatory testing at both pilot-and
commercial-scale, with results of at least 99.9999% (6 nines) destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) for
all materials tested.
In April 1997, ECO LOGIC was contracted by the State of North Carolina to perform treatability testing on
PCB-contaminated soil obtained from the Warren County Landfill in Warren County, North Carolina
(Warren County Landfill soil). This document comprises the Final Test Report for demonstration of ECO
LOGIC's pilot-scale unit on the Warren County Landfill soil. The soil testing took place between May 28
and June 5, 1997 at the US Army's Edgewood Research, Development and Engineering Center (ERDEC)
toxic test chamber facility located at the Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland. The unit was equipped with
a soil processing unit called a Thermal Reduction Mill (TRM), which desorbs organic contaminants, such
as PCBs and PCDD/Fs, from the soil and sweeps the contaminants into the process reactor for destruction.
The Warren County Landfill soil testing program involved three test runs performed on separate days. Each
test run lasted from 2 to 4 hours, and processed approximately 6 to 8 pounds of contaminated soil per hour.
The results of the study are excellent. There were no PCBs observed in the treated soil above a detection
limit of 0.6 ppb and the calculated desorption efficiency of the PCBs using the TRM was 99 .999% or better
for all three te st runs. The DRE, calculated by comparing the mass of PCBs input and output in the product
gas, was consistently greater than 99.999999% (8-nines).
The results of this treatability study demonstrate the feasibility of the ECO LOGIC Process for full-scale
detoxification. The PCB target performance goals of <20 ppb remaining in the treated soil and 8x 10-1
micrograms per cubic meter in the exhaust gas were achieved in all three test runs. The target performance
goal of 1 ppt for dioxin TEQ levels in treated soil was achieved in Runs 1 and 3. No dioxins or furans were
detected in either the product gas or the exhaust gas. However, due to gas sampling and analytical
constraints on detection limits, it was not possible to confirm the ability of the ECO LOGIC Process to meet
the dioxin TEQ performance goal of less than 5x 1 o-s micrograms per cubic meter in the exhust gas.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 1
1. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this project was to demonstrate the ECO LOGIC Process for the treatment of PCB-
contaminated soil from the Warren County Landfill located in North Carolina. The overall goal of the
treatability study was to assist the State of North Carolina with the identification of a viable, safe, non-
incineration technology to treat the toxic constituents of Warren County Landfill soil.
The treatability study on Warren County Landfill soil was performed at the U.S. Army's Edgewood
Research, Development and Engineering Center (ERDEC) toxic test chamber at the Aberdeen Proving
Ground, Maryland, over a one week period from May 28th to June 5th. Project mobilization/ demobilization
activities, treatability test operations, and test results and interpretation are discussed in detail in the
following sections. In addition, issues relating to commercial-scale operations are discussed.
1.1 Technology Overview
The ECO LOGIC Process involves the gas-phase reduction of organic compounds by hydrogen at
temperatures of 850°C or higher. Chlorinated hydrocarbons such as PCBs and PCDD/Fs are chemically
reduced to methane and hydrogen chloride (HCl), while non-chlorinated organic contaminants, such as
PAHs, are reduced substantially to methane and minor amounts of other light hydrocarbons. The HCI
produced can be recovered as acid or neutralized in a caustic scrubber downstream of the process reactor.
Figure 1 shows some examples of the reduction reactions for the destruction of a variety of contaminants
using the ECO LOGIC Process. Unlike oxidation reactions, the efficiency of these reduction reactions is
enhanced by the presence of water, which acts as a heat transfer and reducing agent, as well as a source of
hydrogen. Therefore, dewatering of input waste is unnecessary. The water shift reactions shown produce
hydrogen, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide from methane and water. These reactions are used at higher
efficiencies in a catalytic steam reformer to generate hydrogen for reuse in the system by subjecting scrubbed
methane-rich product gas to high temperatures in the presence of a catalyst.
An additional benefit of using an actively reducing hydrogen atmosphere for the destruction of chlorinated
organic compounds, such as PCBs, is that no formation of PCDDs or PCDFs occurs. Any PCDDs or PCDFs
in the waste are destroyed. The reducing hydrogen atmosphere is maintained at more that 50 percent
hydrogen ( dry basis) to prevent formation of PAHs. This makes the scrubbed recirculated product gas
suitable for continuous monitoring using an on-line chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS). By
measuring the concentrations of intermediate reduction products, the CIMS produces a continuous indication
of destruction efficiency.
1.2 Waste Processing at Commercial-Scale
Figure 2 is a schematic of the SE25 commercial-scale reactor where the destruction of organic-contaminated
waste, through its breakdown into re-usable or disposable products, takes place. Front-end equipment for
processing contaminated solids include a thermal reduction mill (TRM) to desorb organic contaminants from
soil, and a sequencing batch vaporizer (SBV) to desorb organic contaminants from bulk solids and other
large material not suitable for TRM treatment. The various input streams including vaporized liquid wastes
as well as gas streams from front-end desorption systems, can be injected through several ports mounted
tangentially near the top of the reactor. Special nozzles are used to atomize liquid wastes to accelerate liquid
vaporization. The gas mixture swirls around a central stainless steel tube, and is heated by 18 vertical radiant
tube heaters with internal electric heating elements. By the time it reaches the bottom of the reactor, the gas
mixture has reached a temperature of at least 850°C. The process reactions take place from the bottom of
the central tube onwards, and take less than one second to complete.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 2
Figure 1 ECO LOGIC PROCESS REACTIONS
Cl Cl o-D + 5 H2 --2 0 + 4 HCI
Cl Cl
Cl Cl 0 ~ + 8 H2 --2 0
c1 0V c1
+ 4 HCI + 2 H 20
&.J +23 H2 --► 14CH4
C H + {n-1) H 2 --n CH 4 n (2n+2)
WATER SHIFT REACTIONS
CO + 1-l O -CO + H ''2 2 2
PCB molecule & hydrogen
react to produce benzene
& hydrogen chloride
Dioxin molecule & hydrogen
react to produce benzene,
hydrogen chloride & water
PAH molecule & hydrogen
react lo produce methane
Hydrocarbons & hydrogen
react to produce methane
Benzene & water react
to produce carbon
monoxide and hydrogen
Methane & water react to
produce carbon monoxide
and hydrogen
Carbon monoxide & water
react to produce carbon
dioxide and hydrogen
Figure 3 shows the process flow diagram for the commercial-scale system. Process gas leaving the reactor
is scrubbed to remove gaseous HCI, water, heat, fine particulate, aromatic compounds and carbon dioxide.
The first stage of the scrubber can be operated to recover HCI, which avoids acid neutralization with caustic.
For low strength wastes such as contaminated soil and sediment, this first scrubber is operated as a caustic
scrubber for removal of HCI by neutralization.
The second stage of scrubbing drops the temperature of the gas to remove water and completes the removal
of HCI by caustic packed tower scrubbing. Particulate matter, which may have entered the reactor as
dissolved or suspended solids in the original waste, is removed in both the first and second stages of the
scrubber by continuous filtering. Heat is removed using plate heat exchangers and is transferred to the
cooling water system.
The third stage of scrubbing removes low levels of benzene and naphthalene from the gas stream by neutral
oil washing. The rich oil is pumped to a stripper where benzene and naphthalene are removed and sent to
the inlet of the catalytic steam reformer for conversion to hydrogen and carbon dioxide. The fourth
scrubbing stage removes carbon dioxide using monoethanolamine (MEA) absorption. The rich MEA is
pumped to a stripper where the carbon dioxide is removed and is sent to the common boiler/catalytic steam
reformer stack.
The scrubber water from the stage-two scrubber leg returns to the covered section of the scrubber tank
through a drop-tube that extends well below the water surface. This acts as a seal against air infiltration and
as an emergency pressure relief mechanism. There will be no gas release if a short-term pressure surge
forces gas out of the bottom of this tube since a check valve allows the gas to re-enter the system once the
pressure returns to normal. The entire treatment loop operates within 1 psig of atmospheric pressure.
I ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 3
I Figure 2 COMMERCIAL-SCALE PROCESS REACTOR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - -CONTAMINATED SOIL -STEAM FUEL EXHAUST -STEAM HEFORMER --- ------i---i FUEL EXHAUST r-:-1·· NI RECIRCULATION I GA& JL7_:: ... ENERGY __ J ~L --1~ l_ _______ _ __ J ___ _ FUEL ·-· VOLA TILIZEO OASES HlERMAl REDUCTION WILL L___ ______ _j~ ' FUEL EXHAUST CLEANED SOIL OESORBEO OASES ~----------C0NTAt.4LNATEO EQUIPMENT FUEL EXHAUST REACTOR [~~'.] -UCL STEAM WASTE - -RECIRCULATION OA!I Gws~ co_, --··--SCRUBBER SYSTEM HP FUEL FOR BOILER STEAM REFORMER TRM /SBV i---1 _L ---·--------·---··----··---------·----SEQUENCING BATCH VAPORIZER FUEL J L _l___ SEQUENCINO BATCH VAPORIZER _JI. .T __ _ '------CLEANED EQUIPMENT ' HOT WATERY WASTE ----•-----Q-_~'""'""""]-Oll -·-~-~-·--.. CONTAMINATED WATER ---f] --OAS BLOWER --□~~[ COMPRESSOR } -1-==-~~ BOILER FUEL EXHAUST ~~--/-! ---_'\ OAS STORAGE -FUEL --m n 0 ' 0 C) n I 'zj IJQ. ll r:: ., l'D w ,.___, ("') ~ 0 ........ C) Sa: ...... I c,, ~ r:, s:::i ........ ,:I ~ ("') ~ > c,, ..... ~ ;:s" I Oci r.,i ("') '"tJ > s· ~ s:::i M ........ ~ ~ ,:I ~ 0 C) ...., (J ...... M [fJ ~ [fJ [fJ ...., (J ...., ~ ~ :::s \) ~ C) ~ :::s ,-J ~ ""' (J t---< s:::i :::s S; ........ ........ "o ~ ~ 4:..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 5
As waste is processed through the system, acid and water are generated as outputs. Filtered acid is pumped
to a storage tank for further activated carbon treatment prior to recycling. Scrubber decant water is also
filtered and carbon-treated to remove any trace of organic contamination, and is then stored for analysis prior
to discharge. Spent activated carbon can be regenerated on-site in the SBV, and the minor amount of
scrubber particulate produced can also be processed through the TRM or SBV.
The cooled and scrubbed product gas is a clean dry mixture of hydrogen, methane, carbon monoxide, and
other light hydrocarbons. Some of the product gas is reheated and recirculated back into the reactor. Product
gas is also recirculated through the TRM as sweep gas, through the SBV as sweep gas, and through the
catalytic steam reformer for hydrogen generation. Excess product gas is removed from the system,
compressed, and stored. The stored product gas is chemically tested and subsequently used as fuel to heat
ancillary system components.
Storage of the product gas under pressure permits the continuous analysis of the gas to determine that it does
not contain contaminants of concern. It can then be used as supplemental fuel in the boiler/catalytic steam
reformer or auxiliary burner, all of which use natural gas as their primary fuel. A micro gas chromatograph
(micro GC) is used to analyse the gas and provides a continuous record of product gas quality. The micro
GC readings are monitored by the process control system and the use of the product gas as fuel is stopped
automatically should it not meet the established quality criteria. This eliminates the potential for releases
to the environment and the gas can simply be reprocessed.
The product gas is also analyzed by the CIMS and other gas analyzers prior to compression and storage.
The CIMS is capable of accurately monitoring up to IO organic compounds every few seconds at
concentrations ranging from percent levels down to ppb levels. It is used as part of the ECO LOGIC Process
as a diagnostic tool to monitor the concentrations of certain compounds indicative of the process destruction
efficiency. The compounds selected for monitoring depend on the waste being processed. For example,
during PCB processing, monochlorobenzene (MCB) is typically monitored as an indicator of destruction
efficiency. This volatile compound is routinely monitored at low levels as a process control parameter,
which indicates that destruction of the PCBs is proceeding to completion. In addition, benzene and hydrogen
sulfide will be included in the CIMS monitoring program for Warren County Landfill. The CIMS readings
are monitored by the process control system, such that if alarm limits are exceeded, a message is sent
directly to the operator. The process control system monitors and controls over 300 operating parameters
of the process. Set point values and ranges for critical operating parameters are given high priority alarms
to ensure the system performs at optimum conditions. These parameters include operating temperatures and
pressures for the TRM, SBV, reactor, scrubbers and ancillary equipment, residence time through the reactor
and concentrations of gases and contaminants within the process and product gas streams. There are
numerous secondary alarms also linked to the process control to alert operators to deviations from normal
operating ranges. These parameters include tank levels, scrubber pH, pump and vessel pressures, gas and
liquid flowrates, instrument air pressure, valve positions and on/off status of motors, pumps and valves.
Figure 4 presents a "footprint" diagram showing how an SE25 unit would typically be deployed at a site.
Most of the system components are mounted on standard-bed highway trailers for ease of mobility. The
reactor trailer houses the reactor, the electric heating control system, the scrubber system, the recirculation
gas blower, the recirculation gas heater and the watery waste preheater vessel. A second trailer contains the
main power distribution room, the boiler and the catalytic steam reformer. Gas cooling capacity for the
scrubbing system is recirculated through evaporative coolers, and scrubber stripping operations are carried
out in a container situated near the boiler. The product gas compression and storage system is also skid-
mounted to allow flexibility in site layout. For processing soil and other solids, the TRM is housed on a
separate trailer and the SBVs are skid-mounted units. The process control system, gas analyzer systems, and
the command centre are housed in a standard office trailer.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 6
Figure 4 SCHEMA TIC OF A TYPICAL COMMERCIAL-SCALE SITE LAYOUT
r·······················••···•••··················••··•••••••••··•••·••·.
s
1-1
' I
Acceu H I I l~_i
TMS
PARKINGNEHICULAR ACCESS
G
0
0
I
MF
PG I
ss 88
B •*~I,,, BT , .,9,I~·~" -sc~·!
,:; . PR . ' 't EC
"<~ :?. ' ........ .,..,, -----~
f::>,)[,_ .. -· ,,., .... ~-·:,.~-~i~f/ ~~~~;"~,:-:--:-:..._ ;:_, - -. i·:. t . ,,,
l:i:, .. r; •: RM
i'
SB f ,r
. __ L,.:.
C .. ~ r·
I . ;,
f .
I: I: I: I;
I
/ . 1-,,· -I
L _____ 1~ •~:~ -~-.w · __ .. , .. ~ ...::-: ~~ '-.:-~.~'J
Treated Material Out ◄--------Untreated Waste In I
Accsu PERIMETER FENCE
0
AT Acid Tank
BT Boiler Trailer
C Compressor
CRZ Contaminant Reduction Zone
EC Evaporative Coolers
H Hydrogen Tube Trailer
ML Mobile Laboratory Trailer
MF Main Office
N Nitrogen Tank
p Propane Tank
10
I
20
I
Scale (approximate)
PC Process Control Centre
PG Product Gas Storage Tank
PR Process Reactor
s Shop/Mechanical Trailer
SBV Sequencing Batch Vapourizer
SC Stripper Container
ss Sub Station
TMS Treated Mate rial Staging Area
TRM Thermal Reduction Mill
TW Treated Waler Storage Tank
uws Untreated Waste Staging
Exclusion Zone
30 m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 7
1.3 Hvdrogen Safetv
The ECO LOGIC Process uses hydrogen to break down organic contaminants into basic products such as
methane, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. These reactions take place in a sealed system which operates
at essentially ambient pressures (within 0.4 psig of atmospheric pressure). Hydrogen can be explosive only
when combined with oxygen or air, and exposed to a spark. ECO LOGIC has taken numerous measures to
ensure these conditions do not occur, and that the use of hydrogen does not present a danger to its on-site
workers, and the surrounding environment.
1.3.1 Industrial Use Of Hydrogen
Hydrogen has been used in large quantities in the petroleum refining, chemical, petrochemical and synthetic
fuel industries for decades. Therefore, the use of hydrogen in industry is fairly routine. The electrical utility
industry has also successfully used hydrogen gas for more than forty years, for such operations as cooling
rotor and stator coils in large turbine-generators. Hydrogen is already the accepted fuel of the aerospace
industry, and has been safely handled for years in large quantities.
Although hydrogen has been used in industrial processes for decades, it is a relative "unknown" to the public.
It is therefore important to convey to the public that there are strict guidelines for the safe handling and use
of hydrogen, and that adequate measures are available and enforced to ensure the safe use of hydrogen. The
ECO LOGIC Process uses hydrogen according to stringent standards required by both United States and
Canadian regulators.
1.3.2 Features of the ECO LOGIC Process to Ensure Safe Use of Hydrogen
The chemical reactions which comprise the ECO LOGIC Process all take place in a sealed reactor system
which is kept within 0.4 pounds per square inch gauge (psig) of atmospheric pressure. The system is
monitored to ensure that the levels of oxygen remain well below the safe limit, and there are no significant
increases or decreases in pressure. There are several procedures that are carried out during waste processing,
to ensure the safe operation of the ECO LOGIC Process. These procedures combine to avoid the scenarios
under which hydrogen becomes explosive: mixing with oxygen, and exposure to a spark.
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
Prior to any hydrogen being introduced into the system, all vessels that may contain hydrogen-rich
gas are pressure tested to well above normal operating pressure, to ensure they are leak-proof. This
testing includes a final test of the entire system with all vessels connected.
All vessels which might contain hydrogen-rich gas are electrically grounded through the main power
transformer on site. This ensures that even in the unlikely event that the hydrogen combines with
oxygen and becomes explosive, there is no potential for spark ignition.
All gasketed pipeline joints that may contain hydrogen-rich gas are connected by conducting straps
or structural conductors, and grounded.
The ECO LOGIC Process operates as a sealed, closed loop system, at nominal atmospheric pressure
(less that 0.4 psig). Therefore, the possibility of the system rupturing due to over-pressure is
extremely unlikely. Also, the low system operating pressure means that any small leaks which may
occur would release very small amounts of hydrogen -too small to become explosive.
Rigorous procedures are followed for plant operations to ensure that hydrogen-rich gas never mixes
with oxygen or air. For example, all sealed vessels in the system are completely purged and filled
with nitrogen before any hydrogen enters the vessel. The vessels are monitored and hydrogen is
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 8
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
only introduced when the levels of oxygen are well below the safe limit for a hydrogen-oxygen
mixture.
The procedure described in point (v) above is also followed at the end of each waste processing
cycle, when vessels full of hydrogen-rich gas need to be opened. Nitrogen gas is used in the system
as a "buffer" gas between hydrogen and oxygen.
Once a sealed vessel is filled with hydrogen-rich gas, the system is continuously monitored for
oxygen content by process operators, to ensure that any increase of oxygen in the system is
immediately detected. Special actions are taken by the system operators which will correct the
condition well before an explosive mixture is created. The special actions are detailed in a rigorous
response procedure for operators that forms part of the Standard Operating Procedures.
As part of standard system operations, the air around the system is continuously monitored at
numerous strategic locations for explosive conditions due to hydrogen release. Warning alarms will
sound at levels well below an explosive mixture, which gives the system operators ample time to
take the appropriate corrective action.
No open flames or smoking are permitted on-site.
The ECO LOGIC Process has been operating safely at various scales for many years. The use of hydrogen
by ECO LOGIC has never posed a safety risk to on-site workers or the surrounding environment.
Commercial-scale operations and further research and development continue to confirm the ability of the
ECO LOGIC Process to operate safely.
1.4 Process Outputs
The primary outputs from the treatment of PCBs in soil are the treated soil, scrubber water, and product gas.
HCl is recovered only from the processing of highly chlorinated high-strength wastes, such as pure PCB oil
and perchlorinated wastes.
Treated soil Soil treated in the TRM is wetted to cool the material for handling, and to reduce the
potential for dust emissions. The dry treated material is generated at a rate as low as 30 percent of the input
weight due to losses of water, organic contaminants, and carbon. All treated soil is chemically tested for
waste-specific contaminants to verify the adequate removal of organic contaminants. Once analysis has
verified that the material is clean, it can be transported to the on-site disposal area. The treated soil will be
a fine, inert, silica-rich material. No caustic is added to the soil during treatment, and the treated soil is
generally of average pH and salinity which does not prohibit development of plant life. The treated soil can
be mixed with existing soil at the site and also can be used as aggregate for flowable cement mixtures.
Water During normal operations, water is generated as scrubber decant water, which may contain trace
levels of low molecular weight hydrocarbons (benzene and naphthalene). The water will be treated with
granular activated carbon (GAC), stored on-site, and tested to ensure compliance with local discharge
limitations prior to discharge to the municipal sewer system. Alternately, the treated process water can be
re-used on-site in the evaporative coolers.
Product Gas Excess product gas is generated during the destruction of PCBs and other organic
contaminants, and is compressed, tested and subsequently used on-site as fuel to heat the system steam boiler
and catalytic steam reformer.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 9
The composition of the product gas during commercial-scale operations is as follows: hydrogen (65 to 75
percent), methane (10 to 20 percent), and carbon monoxide (5 to 10 percent), with trace amounts of lighter
organic compounds (e.g., ethylene and benzene). Product gas is tested for compounds indicative of
incomplete destruction (monochlorobenzene) once per minute using an on-line micro-GC following
temporary storage. As part of standard operating procedure, the use of product gas as fuel is halted if the
on-line micro-GC detects monochlorobenzene concentrations in excess of I 00 parts per million by volume
(ppmv). In that case, product gas is diverted to a second storage tank, and the system is placed in full
recirculation mode to reprocess the gas and re-establish proper operating conditions. This is a contingency
procedure that has been rarely required to date.
1.5 Summarv of Previous Experience
ECO LOGIC has a high degree of confidence that the ECO LOGIC Process can be optimized for the
destruction of PCBs in the Warren County Landfill soil. This confidence is based on ECO LOGIC's
experience and success with bench-, laboratory-, pilot-and commercial-scale applications of the process to
the treatment of hazardous organic wastes.
Since I 986, ECO LOGIC has conducted extensive research, development, test evaluation and product
engineering with the aim of developing an efficient, non-incineration technology for destroying organic
wastes in a wide range of matrices including soil, sediment, leachate, sludge, bulk solids, and high-and low-
strength liquids. Much of this work was supported by the Governments of Canada (Environment Canada
and the Department of National Defence) and the United States of America (Environmental Protection
Agency -USEPA).
The technology has been demonstrated and proven to be an efficient and publicly acceptable means of
destroying high strength organic waste streams on-site. Development of the ECO LOGIC Process has
progressed to the point where commercial-scale units are currently treating hazardous wastes at sites in
Kwinana, Western Australia and at General Motors of Canada Limited in St. Catharines, Ontario. Details
of treatability-scale TRM testing, as well as current commercial-scale operations and future applications are
discussed below.
Treatability-Sca/e TRM Testing
ECO LOGIC has conducted numerous treatability studies on PCB-contaminated soil with PCB levels similar
to and in excess of those found in Warren County Landfill soil. Results of these research and development
studies are provided in Table 1.
Table 1 TREATABILITY-SCALE THERMAL REDUCTION MILL RESULTS
Waste PCB Processed Solids PCB
Waste Type Concentration (ppm) Concentration (ppm)
Soil (moist, granular, PCB-spiked) 440 0.0039
Soil (moist, granular, PCB-spiked) 520 0.0016
Sediment (muddy, fine, PCB-spiked) 710 0.028
Sediment (muddy, fine, PCB-spiked) 790 0.0097
Sediment (muddy, fine, PCB-spiked) 750 0.065
S,-rlimPnt (m11rlrlv fin,-) 1')()() N 0(0011)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 10
Kwinana, Western Australia
The first SE25 ELI Destructor is currently operational in Kwinana, Western Australia, where contracts for
the destruction and recycling of pesticide residuals and PCB-contaminated electrical equipment have been
awarded. Results of both DDT and PCB testing have been included in Table 2.
A compliance testing program overseen by the representatives of the Western Australian Department of
Environmental Protection was conducted while processing PCB oils. An independent stack sampling
company performed stack gas sampling at the catalytic steam reformer/boiler stack for PCB and semi-
volatile analyses, and all analyses were conducted by an independent laboratory. No PCBs were detected
in the stack gas, and all detected semi-volatile compounds were at concentrations well below air emission
guidelines. Based on a detection limit of 0. 72 µg/m3 for PCBs, the destruction removal efficiency (DRE)
was calculated to be 99.999998 percent (seven nines). This same unit is now being utilized to treat PCB-
contaminated electrical equipment from various regions in Australia.
Table 2 STACK TEST DAT A FOR COMMERCIAL-SCALE
TREATl\ilENT OF DDT AND PCBs
DDT PCBs
Input Quantity Quantity
Duration of Run 81 minutc:s 110 minutes
Fc:ed 127.5 L 122 L
Concentration 30.3 % 90 %
Mass Input 39.7915 kg 1-l2.7-l kg
Output
Gas Flowratc: 0. 76 m3/sc:c 0.601 m3/sc:c
Concc:ntration ~ 1.7 µg!Nm3 <0.72 µg/m3
Mass Output ~ 0.00000628 kg ~ 0.00000187 kg
DRE ~ (39.7915 -0.00000628)/39.7915 DRE~ (142.74 -0.00000187)/142.74
~ 99.999984¾ ~ 99.999998¾
St. Catharines, Ontario
The second SE25 ELI Destructor is currently processing PCB-contaminated materials at the General Motors
of Canada Limited (GMCL) facility in St. Catharines, Ontario. The contaminated matrices include soil,
electrical equipment, askarel, concrete, and various other solid wastes including personal protective
equipment and tools.
Table 3 presents a summary of the DREs and destruction efficiencies (DEs) for PCBs and chlorobenzenes
(CBs) from the performance testing program conducted at GMCL. Initial results of the treated material as
well as ambient air have indicated that the system is conforming to the guidelines set out by the Ontario
Ministry of the Environment and Energy (MOEE). Results of independent regulatory testing show that the
ECO LOGIC treatment system consistently achieved a DRE of at least seven nines (99.99999 percent) for
PCBs and at least six nines for CBs.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 11
Table 3 SUMMARY OF DRE AND DE VALUES FOR PCBS AND CBS AT GMCL
I Parameter I Units I Test 1 I Test 2 I Test 3 I
DRE for PCBs % 99.9999996 99.9999985 99.9999997
DRE for CBs % 99.9999842 99.9999985 99.9999977
DE for PCBs % 99.9999996 99.9999985 99.9999808
DE for CBs % 99.9999836 99.9999972 99.9999971
Future Commercial-Scale Applications
General Electric Canada Inc. has contracted ECO LOGIC to treat PCB-impacted materials stored above-
ground at the Lansdowne and Davenport site in downtown Toronto. Permitting and regulatory and
community approvals for this project have been completed, and details can be found in the Ontario
Environmental Review Board document provided in Appendix A.
2.
2.1
PILOT-SCALE TESTING
Pilot-Scale Svstem Description
The pilot-scale unit for the Warren County Landfill soil testing was set up in the ERDEC toxic test chamber
at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland. This unit and its predecessors have been used by ECO LOGIC
over the past ten years to perform waste-specific treatability studies for many commercial and government
clients. These studies have led to full-scale remediation contracts in both Canada and Australia. Figure 5
presents a generalized process schematic of the pilot-scale unit. The system includes the Thermal Reduction
Mill (TRM), a gas-phase chemical reduction reactor, a two-stage gas scrubbing system, a product gas
compression and storage system with continuous emission monitoring equipment, and an excess gas flare
(used only at pilot-scale).
Soil that has been pre-screened of material greater than 0.5 inches in diameter (S 1 on Figure 5) is input to
the TRM using a hopper feed system. The TRM consists of a heated ball mill that pulverizes the solid feed,
enhancing desorption of organic contaminants into the sweep gas, which is fed into the gas-phase chemical
reduction reactor. The TRM is heated by a bath of molten tin and is operated in a reducing hydrogen
atmosphere at about 600°C. The TRM off-gas (sweep gas, steam and desorbed organic compounds from the
TRM) is further heated in the reactor to about 900°C.
The process gas leaving the reactor, consisting primarily of hydrogen, methane, carbon monoxide and steam,
is routed through a two-stage gas caustic scrubbing system to remove HCl, water, particulate, and heat. The
resulting dry, scrubbed product gas (S6) (approximately 25°C) is then compressed and sent to temporary
storage before being flared in the excess gas flare (S7). The stored product gas is monitored continuously
by the NOV A bulk gas analyzers, and CIMS.
At the end of each test run, the scrubber effluent is collected (S2) and pumped through a filter of activated
carbon. The treated effluent (S4) is analyzed prior to off-site disposal. The particulate filters that were in
use continuously during the test run are removed for sampling and analysis (S3) and replaced for the next
test run.
-- -• -1.5 cfm H2 N2 Purge - --Carbon Filler Purge Soil Feed (5 -10 lbs/hr) S1 Treated Solids (2 -4 lbs/hr) S5 TRM TRM Thermal Reduction Mill R Reactor S Scrubber T Tank R F Scrubber Particulate Filter C Compressor PGS Product Gas Storage H, Hydrogen N, Nitrogen S1-7 Sampling Stations --t----► --s s ( Carbon Filter] --N2 Purge S6 C IO US gallons per minute typical each scrubber) t 20 US gallons per test S4 ---S7 ~ Excess Gas Flare I .5 cfm ,+ PGS ,J Continuous Monitoring --~ -· (JCl = ., ~ u, rJ) (j ::i:= M ~ > --3 -(j 0 ~ "" -t"" 0 --3 I rJ) (j > t"" M ~ > rJ) --3 M "" :,::, 0 (j M rJ) rJ) 52 C') ~ ---3 -m n 0 ' 1g "t) ;::s-~ (1;) ........ "t) ::::.:. 0 -;-,-c-, f) ~ ..._ (1;) ~ c-, ....... ~-~ ::s· ~ ..._ ~ ~ a --: ....... I I:--< ~ ::s Si ..._ ..._ I "tl ~ (1;) ,.._ I'-.)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 13
The system is operated as a once-through system with hydrogen as the sweep gas. The product gas is
compressed, stored and analyzed prior to being sent to the excess gas flare. If the on-line analysis of the
product gas shows levels of monochlorobenzene greater than 100 ppm, use of the product gas in the flare
is discontinued, the waste feed is halted, and the hydrogen input is shut off as the system recirculation valve
is opened. This allows gas to recirculate until the monochlorobenzene concentration decreases to less than
I 00 ppm. It has never been necessary to use this recirculation capability for any of the treatability tests
carried out to date, including the Warren County Landfill soil test runs.
The excess gas flare is equipped with a propane fuel source. The temperature of the propane flame is
maintained at 800 to I 000°C during operation. The hydrogen rich product gas is sent to the flare after
compression and analysis and ignites as it enters the propane flame. The 8 foot excess gas flare stack is
equipped with ports for gas sampling. The use of an excess gas flare occurs only at pilot scale, as a means
of disposing of the hydrogen-rich product gas. At commercial-scale, this product gas is either recirculated
in the system or used as a fuel for system components.
2.2 Pilot-Scale Test Operations
2.2.1 Goals and Objectives of Pilot-Scale Testing
The primary goal of the Warren County Landfill soil pilot-scale testing program was to demonstrate the
ability of the ECO LOGIC Process to treat the soil safely and effectively. The study was undertaken with
the following objectives:
• to determine the feasibility of the technology for full-scale detoxification
• to reduce total PCB concentration in the soil to 20 ppb and Dioxin TEQ down to I ppt with a
proportionate reduction in other chlorinated constituents
• to demonstrate the safety of the technology, rate of detoxification, cost per unit of detoxification and
reduction in long term potential for environmental releases from residuals of the detoxification
process (all factors to assist in determining the feasibility for full-scale detoxification)
• to provide the technical data and a scientific basis for recommendations by the Working Group to
the State for full-scale detoxification of the PCB Landfill
• to demonstrate that air emissions can meet the following performance goals:
< 8 x I 0-4 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/dscm) for PCBs
< 5 x 10-s micrograms per cubic meter (µg/dscm) for Dioxin TEQ
2.2.2 Commissioning Procedures
Commissioning of ECO LOGIC's pilot-scale test unit involved a standard set of mobilization and set-up
procedures and requirements.
The components of the pilot-scale unit including TRM, reduction reactor, scrubber system, compressor,
product gas storage tank and instrumentation were mounted in a standard highway trailer. Mobilization of
the pilot-scale test unit required transportation of the trailer to the ERDEC test facility. The components of
the system were set up within the ERDEC test chamber.
Equipment set-up and system integrity testing involved the following steps:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 14
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
positioning and leveling of the system within the test chamber,
hook-up of electrical power and cooling water,
connection of propane, hydrogen, and nitrogen tanks,
flushing of all fluid piping to ensure that the lines were free of particulate or other foreign objects,
assembly of all components and connection to the remote process control system,
checking of all piping and vessels for leaks,
manual check of all valves in the system,
manual check of all electrically powered pumps, motors, blowers, and heaters,
pressure testing of all gas piping,
connection, calibration and testing of all system control loops and instrumentation .
Complete mobilization, set-up, and system integrity testing of the pilot-scale test unit required approximately
8 days. Table 4 provides the startup and shutdown procedures which were used during system
commissioning and the test runs.
Table 4 PILOT-SCALE STARTUP AND SHUTDOWN PROCEDURES
START UP
Ensure data logging computer and all instrumentation operational
Begin N2 purge. Start compressor and excess gas flare
After 0 2 analyzer <0.4%, begin reactor and TRM heating
Tum on cooling water pump and scrubber pumps
Take sample of pre-run scrubber water
Reactor temperature >500°C, start Hi purge, stop N2 purge
Reactor temperature >900°C and TRlvl >550°C, start gas sampling instrumentation on-line
Record test start time, start waste feed, and begin gas sampling
SHUT DOWN
Waste feed hopper emptied. Stop waste feed
Operate TRM 15 additional minutes then stop TRM milling. Stop gas sampling
Shut offTRlvl heaters and reactor heaters
Shut off Hi purge, start N2 purge
Reactor temperature < I 00°C, shut off N2 purge, shut off cooling water pump, shut off scrubber pump
Remove processed soil from the TRM catch pot for sampling/disposal
Empty scrubber tanks, sample effluent, obtain filter sample
Carbon filter scrubber effluent. Sample treated water
2.2.3 Testing Procedures
Three test runs on Warren County Landfill soil were conducted on 3 separate days. Each test run processed
soil over a 2 to 4 hour period, at a rate of 6 to 8 pounds per hour. Equipment mobilization required 2 days,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 15
followed by 6 days of equipment set-up and commissioning. At the completion of the testing, two days were
required to decontaminate and remove the equipment from the toxic test chambers.
The unit operation team for the Warren County Landfill soil testing was comprised of 3 ECO LOGIC staff
members (Operations Supervisor, System Operator, Technologist). Daily activities involved approximately
3 hours of operations planning and equipment set-up, 2-4 hours operation, and 2 hours of sampling and
equipment shut-down. To maximize soil treatment, routine system maintenance was performed during start-
up and shut-down.
Operation of the unit involved a standard set of start-up/normal operation/shut-down protocols. Table 4
above lists the start-up and shut-down procedures used by the project team. Prior to testing, the system
operator ensured that the process control computer was operational and the CIMS and NOV A analyzers were
calibrated using certified calibration gases. During the test runs, certain operational parameters were
manually logged every ten minutes by the operators. The critical operating parameters included reactor
pressure, reactor temperature, scrubber temperature, scrubber pH, oxygen concentration, dry gas flow rates
of the hydrogen to the TRM and flow of the product gas to the excess gas flare. These data points
complement the suite of compounds continuously monitored by the CIMS and NOV A Bulk Gas analyzer.
All test events that occurred (i.e. manual increase in flow rate, test stop, etc.) were recorded by the operators
in the operating log book and the process data logsheets, which are included in Appendix B.
The soil was transported in a sealed overpac drum . The drum contained four 5-gallon buckets of
contaminated soil in a vermiculite-type packing material. The individual seals of the buckets remained intact
throughout transport. Each bucket was screened separately, and the screened material placed in clean, new
buckets. Only two buckets of soil were required for the treatability study. The screened soil was well mixed
prior to grab sampling for the input soil sample. The weight of the soil bucket was recorded before and after
each test run. There was no mixing of soil between buckets.
Due to the physical dimensions of the pi lot-scale TRM, material greater than 0.5 inches was screened out.
The weights of screened soil and oversize soil for the two buckets processed are provided in Table 5. The
oversize material was mainly large rocks, and represents only a small portion of the total amount of waste
processed. At full-scale this material would either be crushed, or treated in a Sequencing Batch Vaporizer
(SBV), which is designed to treat bulk solids. SBV treatment of rubble, asphalt and concrete mixtures has
been performed extensively at ECO LOGIC's full-scale GMCL facility.
Following the unit start-up period, the contaminated soil was manually placed in the TRM feed hopper which
in turn fed the TRM via a hydraulic piston system. The residence time in the mill was approximately I 5
minutes.
All generated outputs, including scrubber water, filters, treated soil, personal protective equipment and
debris, were disposed of off-site along with the untreated soil, as per the TSCA permit received for the
project.
Table 5 MASS OF SCREENED AND
OVERSIZE MATERIAL
Waste Material Mass (kg)
Bucket I
Screened Soil 23.72
Oversize Material 0.99
Bucket 2
Screened Soil 25.31
Oversize Material 1.20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page I 6
2.3 Process Operating Conditions
A preliminary test was undertaken on May 28th to ensure that all individual components of the ECO LOGIC
Process were operating correctly. Waste feed was initiated at 13:30 and stopped at 14:50. The outputs from
this test were collected and disposed of with the rest of the generated waste. This test allowed calibration
of the waste feed system, optimization of the product gas sampling system, and verification that the system
pressure was regulated by the process control system. No upset conditions were encountered. The system
was shut-down, cleaned and prepared for the first test run. All system conditions determined during the
preliminary test remained constant throughout the performance test runs.
The critical operating parameters for the three test runs are summarized in Table 6.
2.3.1 TRM Operation
The TRM consists of a heated ball mill that pulverizes the solid feed, enhancing desorption of organic
contaminants into the sweep gas, which is fed into the gas-phase chemical reduction reactor. The TRM is
heated by a bath of molten tin and is operated in a reducing hydrogen atmosphere at about 600°C. The off-
gas (sweep gas, steam and desorbed organic compounds from the TRM) is further heated in the reactor to
about 900°C. The TRM feed system consists of a manual valve feed input to a feed hopper. A hydraulic
piston then pushes the contaminated soil into the mill.
The contaminated soil was manually loaded into the feed hopper each minute in pre-determined amounts
to maintain the processing target rate of 5 to IO pounds per hour. The soil had a residence time of
approximately 15 minutes in the mill. The average mill temperature was 595°C, 572°C and 628°C for Runs
I, 2 and 3, respectively. Pre-heated hydrogen was input counter-current to the flow of the soil. This ensured
that the mill atmosphere was saturated with hydrogen prior to introducing contaminated soil. The soil
traveled along the horizontal axis of the mill and was collected in the solids collection pot. The recovered
treated solids were weighed and sampled.
2.3.2 Reactor Operation
The reactor was operated at an average temperature of 892°C, 894°C and 897°C for Runs 1,2 and 3,
respectively. The design of the reactor ensured that the residence time was greater than I second to achieve
complete destruction of the organic contaminants. The operating pressure was maintained between 0.25 and
0.33 psig for all the test runs. The hydrogen was maintained throughout each test at a minimum
concentration of 80 percent.
2.3.3 Scrubber Operation
The scrubbers provide neutralization of HCI, condensation of moisture and removal of particulate from the
product gas. The design of the scrubber towers is such that the product gas is thoroughly wetted and reacted
from both the top and middle spray inputs. The flow of the product gas is concurrent in the first scrubber
and counter-current in the second scrubber. A caustic solution was added to the scrubber water to maintain
a pH greater than 10 for all of the test runs. The caustic scrubbers ensured that any HCI formed within the
reactor was neutralized prior to the compression and storage of the product gas.
The scrubbers were charged with 35 liters of fresh caustic solution prior to commencing each test. The
scrubber solutions were cooled in-line with water jacket heat exchangers and a supply of cold water. The
average scrubber 2 temperature was 22°C, !6°C and 17°C for Runs I, 2 and 3, respectively. At the
completion of each test run, the scrubber solutions were sampled, tertiary treated through a carbon filter, re-
sampled and ultimately stored in drums for appropriate disposal.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 17
Table 6 SUMMARY OF WARREN COUNTY LANDFILL SOIL TEST RESULTS
Parameter Units Test I Test 2 Test 3
Date 02 June 1997 03 June 1997 05 June 1997
Start Time 13 :50 12:35 15 :25
Finish Time 16:30 15:50 18:25
Operating Parameters
Waste feed rate kg/hr 3.5 3.4 3.2
Mass input per test (wet basis) ko ::, 9.4 11 9.4
PCB concentration in feed (dry basis) mg/kg 260 250 200
PCBs input per test g 2.2 2.4 I. 7
TEQ concentration in feed pg/g 350 340 21
Residence Time
TRM soil minutes 15 15 15
Reactor gas seconds 3.6 3.8 4.3
Hydrogen Concentration % >80 >90 >90
Reactor Pressure psig 0.33 .27 0.25
Reactor Temperature oc 870 876 913
TRM Temperature oc 595 572 621
Scrubber #2 Temperature oc 22 16 17
CIMS Monochlorobenzene ppm 0 0.31 0
Concentration
Gas Flare Temperature oc 286 346 441
Oxygen Concentration % 0.3 0.1 0.5
2.4 Deviations from Test Plan
During the course of the TRM commissioning and operations, mechanical problems were encountered and
required corrective action, as described below:
During feed system testing it became apparent that bridging of soil within the hopper and plugging
of the feed chamber was possible, due to the consistency of the soil. In order to avoid this situation,
the hopper was filled manually each minute with a discrete amount of contaminated soil to ensure
that the proposed feed rate of 5-10 pounds per hour was accomplished. This manual procedure
resulted in the elimination of feed system plugging and feed rates of 7-8 pounds per hour.
The first test run was attempted on May 29th. Waste processing began at 10:05 and was completed
at 13:40. Upon removal of the solids collection pot, it was discovered that very little treated solid
was recovered. System inspection revealed that the mill shaft had sheared and the mill was not
rotating throughout the test run. As a result, the solids fed to the mill were not removed from the
mill. The mill was cleaned and a new drive shaft was fabricated and installed. Runs 1 and 2 were
then performed without incident. Run 3 was attempted on June 4th but was aborted after one hour
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 18
•
2.5
of waste processing, due to the same mechanical problem with the drive shaft. Maintenance was
performed and the final test run was successfully completed on June 5th.
The test plan indicated that both a micro-GC and a CIMS would be used to monitor selected
compounds in the product gas. These were essentially redundant instruments as they were both
intended to monitor the same chemical species at the same sampling location. As the micro-GC was
not operational and could not be used for this study, only the CIMS was used to monitor the product
gas.
The test plan specified that the TRM temperature would be maintained at a minimum of 500°C .
During Run 2, the temperature was inadvertently allowed to drop below this limit, due to operator
error. The impacts from this drop in temperature on test results are discussed further in Section 3 .2
of th is report.
The test plan stated that the excess gas flare would be operated at 800°C. However, due to operator
error, the flare was operated at temperatures between 300-400°C. Gas sample data indicates that
there were no adverse effects as a result of operating the excess gas flare at lower temperatures.
Sampling and Monitoring Procedures
Sampling locations for the soil treatability test were as follows:
SI -Untreated Soil
S2 -Scrubber Effluent (pre-tertiary treatment)
S3 -Scrubber Effluent Particulate
S4 -Scrubber Effluent (post-tertiary treatment)
S5 -Treated Soil
S6 -Product Gas
S7 -Excess Gas Flare Exhaust
These sampling locations are shown on Figure 5. The sampling program and analytical methods are
summarized in Table 7 and discussed below. The testing program allowed for verification of desorption
efficiencies and destruction and removal efficiencies (DREs), and characterization of all output streams.
All samples were homogenized, where appropriate, to ensure they were representative of the matrix being
tested. Input soil and treated soil were manually homogenized prior to treatment and/or sampling.
Representative pre-tertiary scrubber solution samples were taken from actively mixed tanks. The product
gas and exhaust gas were sampled by TRC Environmental Corporation. Sampling activities were undertaken
by personnel experienced in the operations and sampling associated with the pilot-scale unit.
Warren County Landfill soil was subjected to 3 test runs, which were performed over three separate days.
The information provided below describes the sampling locations and corresponding analytes.
Untreated Soil (SJ): Soil was screened by ECO LOGIC and the< 0.5 inch soil placed in a clean five-gallon
bucket. Soil was processed at a rate of 6 to 8 pounds per hour. The oversize (> 0.5 inch fraction) was
weighed and then disposed of off-site using a licenced waste hauler. The screened < 0.5 inch material was
well mixed prior to sampling to ensure it was representative of the screened soil. A grab sample was taken
of screened material prior to each test to assess input waste chemical characteristics. All sampling was
accomplished using a clean, stainless steel trowel, and the samples were analyzed for PCB congeners,
PCDDs, PCDFs and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page I 9
Scrubber Effluent (Pre-Tertiary Treatment) (S2): The liquid used for scrubbing the process gas was an
aqueous sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution to collect hydrogen chloride emissions. Scrubber effluent
samples were collected in 1 Lamber glass jars at the end of each test run. Samples obtained for each test
run were analyzed for PCB congeners, PCDDs and PCDFs.
Scrubber Effluent Particulate (S3): Particulate in the untreated scrubber effluent from each scrubber was
filtered in-line using 1 µm cartridge filters. The filters were removed after each test run and subjected to
analysis for PCBs. Note that at commercial-scale, the scrubber particulate would be retreated in the system,
rather than disposed of as a system output.
Scrubber Effluent (post-tertiary treatment) (S4): Once the scrubber effluent had passed through the
activated carbon system, scrubber effluent samples (post-tertiary treatment) were collected and analyzed in
the same manner as S2.
Treated Soil (S5): After treatment in the TRM, the dry treated soil was discharged into a solids collection
pot where it was cooled and weighed prior to sampling. A grab sample was obtained for each test run, and
analyzed for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs, VOCs and Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).
Product Gas (S6): Samples were collected downstream of the reactor and the gas scrubbing system through
a stainless steel isokinetic sampling port throughout waste processing. Samples were analyzed for PCBs,
PCDDs and PCDFs. In addition to this sampling, the product gas was subjected to continuous analysis for
monochlorobenzene, benzene and toluene using the CIMS. Bulk gases, including hydrogen, methane, carbon
monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ). were also continuously monitored.
Excess Gas Flare Exhaust (S7): The excess gas flare has two 4 inch diameter sampling ports, located at
right angles to each other, which allow isokinetic sampling. Samples of the excess gas flare exhaust were
collected as it was discharged to the atmosphere. This facilitated obtaining representative samples that could
be used to determine overall process efficiency. Two to four hour continuous samples \Vere collected for
PCB, PCDD and PCDF analyses.
2.5.1 Sampling Methods
Sampling methods for the testing program are listed in Table 7. For each test, detailed sampling and analysis
was performed on input soil, treated soil, scrubber water, product gas and exhaust gas. Gas samples were
collected by TRC Environmental Corporation, Lowell, MA., for all performance test runs and analyzed for
PCBs, and PCDD/PCDF by Quanterra Environmental Laboratories. Analyses of all parameters in solid and
liquid samples were performed by Triangle Laboratories Inc., Durham, North Carolina. Details of the
sampling and analytical procedures are contained in separate documents prepared by these laboratories.
2.5.2 General Sampling/Quality Control Procedures
Quality control measures for process sampling includes a check on the following procedures:
•
•
cleaning of the sampling equipment
sample collection procedures
techniques for sample mixing
recording observations on pre-formatted data sheets
In order to prevent cross-contamination of the samples, the sampling staff ensured that there was no personal
or environmental contamination from the surrounding areas during sampling and storage. The controlled
provision of clean supplies minimized the possibility of sample contamination.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 20
All clean sampling equipment was solvent rinsed with acetone and hexane prior to use. Samplers recorded
all observations on pre-formatted data sheets. Samples were stored at 4°C (refrigerated) in the dark prior
to transportation to the analytical laboratory in coolers. Copies of the chain of custody forms are provided
in Appendix C.
2.5.3 Liquid Sampling
Liquid samples of treated and untreated scrubber water were obtained by grab sampling. Samplers wore
solvent resistant latex gloves, and other personal protective equipment (PPE) necessary for each particular
sample. Liquid grab samples collected from actively mixed tanks were poured directly into l L amber glass
bottles provided by the subcontracted analytical laboratory, and appropriately labeled. Samples were then
logged in and stored in the refrigerator at 4°C before being transported to the laboratory for analysis.
2.5.4 Soil Sampling
Soil was sampled using the grab sampling technique. Samplers wore solvent resistant latex gloves and other
PPE necessary for each particular sample. All solid samples were placed into solvent rinsed sample jars
provided by the subcontracted analytical laboratory, and appropriately labeled. Samples were then logged
in and stored in the refrigerator at 4°C before being transported to the laboratory for analysis.
2.5.5 Gas Sampling
Specific details of excess gas flare exhaust sampling are contained in a separate report entitled Source
Testing Results of a Treatability Study (North Carolina) Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Edgewood, Maryland,
prepared by TRC Environmental Corporation.
Gas sampling was performed using a sampling train comprised of a heated probe and particulate filter,
followed by a condenser and resin trap. Particulate was collected on the heated filter, with the vapor-phase
contaminants passing through to the resin. During analysis, both the particulate filter and resin trap were
analysed. Therefore, data reported for exhaust and product gases includes the contaminants present in both
the particulate and vapor phase.
2.5.6 Process Performance Monitoring Via On-Line Instrumentation
The concentrations of specific compounds within the product gas were continuously monitored by the
Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer (CIMS), a NOV A Bulk Gas Analyzer and a NOV A Oxygen
Analyzer. The gas was sampled after it was compressed and stored. The CIMS is capable of accurately
monitoring up to ten organic compounds every few seconds at concentrations ranging from parts per billion
up to percent levels. For this treatability study, the CIMS was configured to measure benzene,
monoclorobenzene and toluene. Measurement of these intermediate reduction products provides a
continuous indication of destruction efficiency as well as detection of unwanted compounds in the product
gas before consumption in the excess gas flare. Data from the CIMS was also directly connected to alarm
limits and operator indicators.
The NOV A Bulk Gas Analyzer was used to continuously monitor the concentrations of CO, CO2, methane
and hydrogen. The reducing hydrogen atmosphere is maintained at more than 50 percent hydrogen (dry
basis) to prevent formation of PAHs. Hydrogen concentration is thus a critical operating parameter. Levels
of CO, CO2, and methane are measured as final products of reduction to evaluate the destruction efficiency.
The concentration of oxygen in the system is also a critical operating parameter. The continuous monitoring
ability of the NOVA oxygen analyzer allows for the safe operation of the process. Both NOVA analyzers
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 21
were linked to the data logging system. The system was equipped with appropriate alarm indicators to
ensure the safest and most efficient operation of the ECO LOGIC Process.
Each instrument was zeroed and calibrated before and after each test run. The on-line data is provided
graphically in Appendix D.
Table 7 SUMMARY OF SAMPLING PROGRAM FOR WARREN COUNTY LANDFILL SOIL
Parameter and Sampling/ Frequency of Analytes Sampling Methods Analytical
Location Monitoring Sampling Method
(see Figure 5) Method
Untreated Soil grab I grab sample per PCB congeners Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 680
(S 1) sampling test run PCDD/Fs Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 8290
voes Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 8260
Scrubber Effluent grab 1 grab sample per PCB congeners Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 680
(pre-tertiary sampling test run PCDD/Fs Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 8290
treatment) (S2)
Scrubber Effluent -grab I grab sample PCB congeners Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 680
particulate (S3) sampling from each filter
after each test
run, composited
to one grab
sample per test
run
Scrubber Effluent grab I grab sample per PCB congeners Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 680
(post-tertiary sampling test run PCDD/Fs Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 8290
treatment) (S4)
Treated Soil grab I grab sample per PCB congeners Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 680
(S5) sampling test run PCDD/Fs Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 8290
voes Comp./grab SW 846 EPA 8260
Leach TestrrCLP Comp./grab SW 846 EPAl31 l
Product Gas (S6) M23 I sample PCB congeners EPA Method 23 EPA 680
sampling collected for each PCDD/Fs EPA Method 23 EPA 8290
train test run, over
length of test run
Product Gas CIMS continuous Monochlorobenz
NOVA monitoring ene, benzene,
toluene, H2, CH,
CO,CO2
Excess Gas Flare M23 I sample PCB congeners EPA Method 23 EPA 680
Exhaust (S7) sampling collected for each PCDD/Fs EPA Method 23 EPA 8290
train test run, over
length of test run
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 22
3.
3.1
TEST RESULTS
Chemical Analvsis of Svstem Inputs and Outputs
Tables 8 to 14 summarize key analytical data for untreated soil waste input and all outputs from the three
test runs. Sampling locations (S 1 through S7) are illustrated in Figure 5 and described in more detail in
Table 7. Included in the summary tables are the total PCB concentrations used for the calculation of TIUv1
desorption efficiencies and system destruction and removal efficiencies (DREs). 2,3,7,8-
tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin toxic equivalents (TEQs) for all samples and detected volatile compounds in
solid samples are also reported. Finally, TCLP data is provided, where available. Total PCBs are reported
as the sum of all detected isomers. TEQs were calculated assuming all non-detect values were present at
one-half their detection limits. Complete laboratory data sets are provided in Appendix E.
Table 8 CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN UNTREATED SOIL (Sl)
Analyte Run I Run 2 Run]
Total PCBs (mg/kg) 260 250 200
Dioxin (TEQ) (pg/g) 350 340 21
voes (ng/g) Methylene Chloride 10 1.8 2.8
Carbon Tetrachloride 25 2 1 ND (0.37)
Toluene 38 4.1 2.6
Tetrachloroethene ND (4.7) 2.3 1.2
1,3 ,5-Trimethlybenzene ND (1.7) 0.28 ND(0.13)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND (2.9) 2.9 ND (0.22)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 23
Table 9 CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN TREATED SOIL ( S5)
Analyte Run I Run2 Run 3
Total PCBs (ng/g) ND (0.6) ND (0.5) ND (0.5)
Dioxin (TEQ) (pg/g) 0.49* 380 0.51
voes (ng/g) Methylene Chloride 1.6 11 5.3
Carbon Tetrachloride 24 18 ND (0.74)
Toluene 3.2 22 2.9
Tetrachloroethene 3.6 ND (1.7) ND (0. 19)
Ch lorobenzene 7.1 ND (0.63) ND (0.070)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.3 ND (0.73) ND (3.5)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND (0.14) 3.6 ND(4.l)
Naphthelene ND (0.07) 3.6 ND (2.2)
Benzene 0.23 6.7 6.1
TCLP (µg/L) Arsenic 5.0 6.0 ND (4.0)
Barium 380 280 350
Chromium 13 11 9.0
Lead 930 220 220
Selenium 3.0 3.0 ND (5.0)
Carbon Tetrachloride ND (0.10) I. I ND (0.10)
* 2 congeners detected -all other congeners assumed to be present at one-half the detection limit
Table 10 CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SCRUBBER EFFLUENT
(PRE-TERTIARY TREATMENT) (S2)
Analyte Run I Run 2 Run 3
Total PCBs (µg/L) 0.38 0.4 I 0.39
Dioxin (TEQ) (pg/L) ND (6.4) 7.2* 3.2**
* I congener detected -all other congeners assumed to be present at one-halt the detection limit
** 2 congeners detected -all other congeners assumed to be present at one-half the detection limit
Table 11 CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SCRUBBER EFFLUENT
(POST-TERTIARY TREATMENT) (S4)
Analyte Run I
Total PCBs (µg/L) ND (0.008)
Dioxin (TEQ) (pg/L) ND (5.2)
* 2 congeners detected; blank interference on both
** Blank interference on only congener detected
Run 2
ND (0.007)
5.9*
Run 3
ND (0.006)
2.6**
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 24
Table 12 CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SCRUBBER EFFLUENT
PARTICULATE (S3)
Analyte Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Total PCBs Filter I (µgig) 5.0 II II
Total PCBs Filter 2 (µgig) 0.35 1.4 0.97
Table 13 CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN PRODUCT GAS (S6)
Analyte Run I Run 2 Run3
Total PCBs (ng/dscm) 2.9 1.4 0.90
Dioxin (TEQ) (pg/dscm) ND (63) ND (39) ND (48)
Table 14 CHEMICAL CONCENTRATIONS IN EXHAUST GAS (S7)
Analyte Run I I Runl Run3
Total PCBs (ng/dscm) 0.17 0.13 0.077
Dioxin (TEQ) (pg/dscm) ND (8.3) ND (7.6) ND (6.4)
3.2 Discussion of Results
The results presented in Section 3. I were interpreted to evaluate the performance of the process in terms of
the objectives of the study, as described in Section 2.2.1 . During interpretation, the data in Section 3.1 were
subjected to a number of calculations to arrive at the results summarized in the following sections. For
presentation purposes, all data was rounded to two significant figures following calculations.
3.2.1 PCB Destruction and Removal Efficiency
Destruction and Removal Efficiency (DRE) is the measure of the quantity of a contaminant input to the
reactor which does not exit the system as gas. It is calculated as follows:
Destruction and Removal Efficiency
= JOO x [l -(total PCB mass in gas)/(total PCB mass input to reactor)}
PCB DREs were calculated for two scenarios as presented in Table 15. The first scenario compares the mass
of PCBs in the input solid versus the mass of PCBs detected in the product gas. The second scenario
compares the mass of PCBs in the input solid versus the mass of PCBs detected in the exhaust gas.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 25
Table 15 DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES OF PCBS
Waste Input versus Product Gas
PCB Parameter Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
Mass Waste Feed (dry basis) g 8,400 9,800 8,300
Net PCB Concentration µg/g 260 250 200
PCB Mass In mg 2,200 2,400 1,700
Product Gas Flow dscf/min 0.95 0.92 0.89
Product Gas PCB Concentration pg/dscf 81 .rn 25
Test Duration min 160 195 180
PCB Mass Out mg 0.000012 0.0000072 0.0000041
DRE % 99.9999994 99.9999997 99.9999998
Waste Input versus Exhaust Gas
PCB Parameter Units Run I Run 2 Run 3
Mass Waste Feed (dry basis) g 8,400 9,800 8,300
Net PCB Concentration µgig 260 250 200
PCB Mass In mg 2,200 2,400 1,700
Exhaust Gas Flow dscf/min 56 51 49
Exhaust Gas PCB Concentration pg/dscf 4.7 3.8 2.2
Test Duration min 160 195 180
PCB Mass Out mg 0.000042 0.000038 0.0000 I 9
DRE % 99.999998 99.999998 99.999998
The DREs calculated for both scenarios are excellent for all test runs. DREs for the waste input versus the
scrubbed product gas were 99.999999% (eight nines) or better for all three test runs. The DREs calculated
for the waste input versus the exhaust gas were consistently a minimum of99.99999% (seven nines). DREs
based on the exhaust gas are generally slightly lower than the product gas due to the extremely low levels
of PCBs observed at these sampling points and the higher flow rate of gas at the exhaust gas sampling
location. The excess gas flare is clearly not required to achieve complete destruction of the PCBs based on
the fact that eight-nines DRE was demonstrated in the product gas prior to combustion. These results prove
the ability of the ECO LOGIC Process to achieve TSCA incineration equivalency guidelines for PCB
reduction and the feasibility of the ECO LOGIC Process for full-scale detoxification.
3.2.2 PCB Desorption Efficiency in the TRM
PCB desorption efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of the TRM to desorb PCBs from the soil. The
value is calculated as follows:
Desorption Efficiency
= JOO x [l -(total PCB concentration in treated soil)/(total PCB concentration in untreated soil)}
Table 16 presents the desorption efficiencies calculated for PCB desorption from the soil using the TRM for
each test run. There were no PCBs detected in the treated soi I for all three test runs. For the purposes of the
desorption efficiency calculation, the concentration of PCBs in the treated soil was assumed to be equivalent
to the highest detection limit reported. Greater than 99.999% (five nines) desorption efficiencies are
consistently demonstrated. These results prove the ability of the TRM to effectively desorb PCBs from the
Warren County Landfill soil and the feasibility of the ECO LOGIC Process for full-scale detoxification.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 26
Table 16 PCB DESORPTION EFFICIENCY IN TRM
PCB Parameter Run 1 Run 2 Run3
PCBs in Untreated Soil (µgig) 260 250 200
PCBs in Treated Soil (µg/g) <0.0006 <0.0005 <0.0005
Desorption Efficiency of PCBs (%) 99.9998 99.9998 99.9998
3.2.3 PCDDs and PCDFs
Levels of PCDDs and PCDFs, expressed as TEQs, in untreated soil were 350, 340 and 200 pg/g (ppt) for
Runs 1, 2 and 3, respectively. TEQ concentrations in treated soil were 0.49 and 0.51 for Runs 1 and 3,
respectively. These values meet the target performance goal of 1 ppt TEQ in treated soil.
The TEQ level in treated soil from Run 2 was 380 ppt, which is slightly higher but in the same order of
magnitude as the input soil TEQ concentration. This indicates that PCDDs and PCDFs were not fully
desorbed from the soil during this test run. A review of operator logs shows that the temperature in the TRM
was inadvertently allowed to drop to 500°C, which is below the minimum operating temperature of 550°C
to ensure adequate desorption of all organic compounds.
During TRM treatment, contaminants in the soil are not only being volatilized for introduction to the reactor,
they are also undergoing gas-phase reduction. A component of this reduction is dechlorination of the
chlorinated compounds. In the case of PCDDs and PCDFs, all congeners are being dechlorinated. However,
there are considerably more of the higher chlorinated congeners (such as OCDD and HpCDD) in the input
soil. Therefore, during reduction these higher chlorinated congeners are losing chlorines to result in an
increase in the concentration of the lower chlorinated congeners. As the temperature in the TRM decreased,
these lower chlorinated congeners may have partitioned out of the gas phase and re-adsorbed to the soi I.
Note that the toxicity (TEQ value) of the soil in Run 2 is roughly the same for both untreated and treated
material (i.e. within the same order of magnitude), and so the toxicity is not significantly increasing overal I.
Furthermore, as illustrated in Figure 6, the overall amount of PCDDs and PCDFs, with the exception of the
lower chlorinated congeners, decreased considerably over the run. The pattern of PCDDs and PCDFs shifted
from predominantly higher chlorinated congeners to increased lower chlorinated congeners during TRM
treatment. The conditions experienced during Run 2 are not representative of typical treatment operations,
and therefore the results are anomalous. As evidenced by the excellent post-treatment values for Runs 1 and
3, operation of the TRM at the appropriate temperature allows for full desorption of the PCDD and PCDF
congeners.
Full-scale ECO LOGIC waste processing systems have a rigorous process control system which eliminates
the possibility of a drop in TRM temperature occurring. This process control system is computer-operated
and alarms are activated in the event that any of the operating parameters (including TRM temperature) fall
out of range. Note, however, that even if such a drop in temperature were possible at full-scale, it would
not have a negative impact on the environment or the safety of site workers and the public. All outputs from
the system, including treated soil, are held and tested prior to their reuse in the system or disposal off-site.
If the soil, or any other system output, was found to contain levels of contaminants higher than the regulatory
criteria, the material would simply be reprocessed in the system until compliance with criteria is confirmed.
I ECO LOGIC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 27
Figure 6 PCDD AND PCDF PATTERNS IN RUN 2
UNTREATED AND TREATED SOIL
Run 2 Untreated Soil
5000 +--->----+------+---+-
4000 +--+-----+--+---+-
a. 3000 +--+-----+--+---+-c.
Total
Run 2 Treated Soil
6000
5000
4000
a. 3000 C.
2000
1000
0 -•Cii ---TCDD' HxCDC OCDD ~eCDF HpCD
Total
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 28
As indicated on Tables 10 and 11 , levels ofTEQs decrease in all scrubber water samples following carbon
treatment. The only congeners detected in the post-carbon samples were also detected in the laboratory
blanks associated with these samples.
3.2.4 TCLP
The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) was utilized to determine whether the treated soil
met regulatory levels prescribed in 40 CFR 261.24. Individual TCLP values for each test run were similar
and are presented in Table 9. The TCLP regulation states that a solid waste exhibits the characteristics of
toxicity if, using the accepted analytical procedure, the extract from a representative sample of the waste
contains contaminants at a concentration equal to or greater than the regulatory levels. The TCLP values
for the treated soil are all below the regulatory criteria, which indicates that TRM treatment does not cause
the material to exhibit toxicity characteristics, as defined by the EPA.
3.2.5 Comparison of Test Results to Target Performance Goals
There were a number of target performance goals defined in the Request for Proposal. A discussion of the
success of the ECO LOGIC treatability study, with respect to these goals, is provided below.
• To reduce total PCB concentration in soil down to 20 ppb
•
•
PCBs were not detected in the treated soil for all three test runs. The sum of the detection limits is
<4.1 ppb and the largest single limit is <0.6 ppb. Therefore, the study successfully demonstrated
that the ECO LOGIC Process consistently reduces the total PCB concentration down to well below
the target performance goal of 20 ppb.
To reduce total dioxin TEQ in soil down to 1 ppt
The TEQ concentrations in treated soil were 0.49 and 0.51 ppt for Runs 1 and 3, respectively, which
confirms the ability of the ECO LOGIC Process to achieve the target performance goal of I ppt.
TRM temperature conditions during Run 2 were below typical operating levels, and therefore not
sufficient to desorb all of the PCDDs and PCDFs present in the untreated soil.
to demonstrate that air emissions of PCBs meet <8 x 1 (t4 micrograms per cubic meter
The highest total PCB concentration observed in the exhaust gas was 1. 7 x 104 µg/dscm for run 1.
Therefore, the study successfully demonstrated the ability of the ECO LOGIC Process to meet the
PCB emission performance goal of <8 x 104 µg/dscm.
To demonstrate that air emissions of Dioxin TEQ meet <5 x 10 ·8 micrograms per cubic meter
PCDD/Fs were not observed above the detection limits in the exhaust gas for all three test runs. The
highest possible TEQ in the exhaust gas, based on the detection limits, was 1. 7 x 1 o-s µg/dscm. This
value is limited by the sample size of the exhaust gas and the analytical detection limits. Due to
these sampling and analytical constraints, it is not possible to demonstrate the ability of the ECO
LOGIC Process to meet the TEQ performance goal of <5 x 1 o-s µg/dscm.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 29
3.2.6 Comparison of PCBs and TEQs in System Outputs to Regulatory Criteria
Outputs from the ECO LOGIC Process are treated solid material (i.e. treated soil), scrubber water and
exhaust gas. Table 17 provides a summary of PCB and TEQ levels in these process outputs, along with
target performance goals and EPA regulatory criteria.
The Universal Treatment Standards for PCDDs and PCDFs, cited in 40 CFR 268.48, lists criteria of 0.001
mg/kg ( 1000 pg/g) for each of the tetra-chlorinated through hexachlorinated PCDD/PCDFs. For Run 1, no
tetra-through hexa-chlorinated congeners were detected, with detection limits in the area of 0.3 to 0.6 pg/g.
For Run 2, where the temperatures in the TRM were not sufficient to fully desorb the PCDDs and PCDFs,
the levels of tetra-through hexa-chlorinated congeners were nevertheless below the Universal Treatment
Standard. Levels of tetra-through hexa-chlorinated congeners in Run 3 were mostly non-detect, with the
highest level detected being 0.6 pg/g. Clearly, all levels are below the Universal Treatment Standards, and
Runs 1 and 3 achieved the Target performance goal for TEQs of I pg/g (Table 17 below).
For air outputs, acceptable levels are generally calculated according to risk, rather than an absolute value that
must be met. However, the EPA has recently proposed a Hazardous Waste Combustion Rule, which states
that incinerators must have less than 0.2 ng/dscm TEQs in their exhaust gas. Although the ECO LOGIC
Process is not an incinerator, this rule can be used as a yardstick for assessing outputs from the process. As
indicated by the table, TEQ levels in ECO LOGIC exhaust gas are well below 0.2 ng/dscm (approximately
25 times below). In fact, no PCDDs or PCDFs were detected in either the product gas or the exhaust gas,
however, the detection limits are such that compliance with the RFP's target performance goal of 5x I 0-3
µg/m3 (0.00005 ng/m3) can not be confirmed.
The TSCA office of the EPA, which regulates PCB destruction facilities, does not have a exhaust gas level
for PCBs. Their criteria are that at least 6-nines destruction and removal efficiency occurs, and that the
levels of PCBs in liquid and solid outputs do not exceed 2 ppm . As shown in the table below, the ECO
LOGIC Process achieved better than 6-nines DRE, and levels in outputs were well below 2 ppm, in some
cases by several orders of magnitude. Levels of PCBs in system outputs were also well below the target
performance goals of 20 ppb for treated soil and 8xl0-1 µg/m3 (0.8 ng/m3) for air emissions.
The levels achieved for treated soil would allow the soil to be either replaced on-site, or landfilled as clean
fill. The quality of the treated water is such that it can be discharged to a municipal sewer system.
4.
4.1
APPLICATION TO FULL-SCALE
Ability to Accommodate High Water Content
The ECO LOGIC Process requires water (as steam) in the reactor to aid in heat transfer. Hydrogen alone
is relatively invisible to the infrared radiant heat from the reactor electric heater tubes, but steam absorbs this
heat very well and transfers it convectively to the hydrogen and other gases. Since it is a chemical reduction
process, rather than an incineration process, the presence of water does not interfere with contaminant
destruction. Rather, it aids in supplying some of the hydrogen necessary for reduction by reacting with
methane that is present to form CO and hydrogen.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 30
Table 17 SUMMARY OF PCB AND TEQ
DATA FOR PROCESS OUTPUTS
Treated Soil Post-Carbon Scrubber
Water
Run I
PCBs < 0.6 ppb < 0.008 ppb
TEQs < 0.5 ppt < 4.9 ppq
Run 2
PCBs < 0.5 ppb < 0.007 ppb
TEQs 380 ppt < 5.9 ppq
Run 3
PCBs < 0.5 ppb < 0.006 ppb
TEQs < 0.5 ppt < 2.9 ppq
Target Performance Goal
PCBs 20 ppb --
TEQs I ppt --
Regulatory Criteria
PCBs 2000 ppb1 2000 ppb1
TEQs I 000 ppt/congener2 --
1 Toxic Substances Control Act
2 EPA Universal Treatment Standard
3 EPA proposed Hazardous Waste Combustion Rule
Exhaust Gas
0.17 ng/dscm
< 0.0083 ng/dscm
0.13 ng/dscm
< 0.0076 ng/dscm
0.077 ng/dscm
< 0.0064 ng/dscm
0.8 ng/dscm
0.00005 ng/dscm
• 99. 9999%DRE 1
0.2 ng/dscm3
The water in the waste soil is all sent to the reactor from the TRM during continuous desorption. The TRM
has enough heating capacity to dry very wet soils, sludges and sediments prior to heating the dried solids to
600°C. The ability to process wet material provides an economic benefit and also avoids potential
environmental emission problems. The high moisture content of the waste feed will mainly be a concern
in selecting the appropriate feed system design to ensure continuous design throughput. The amount of
moisture in the soil is one criteria that influences throughput, as additional moisture requires more heat input
to the system per unit of waste. As a result, the soil from below the water table will be processed at a slower
rate than that from above the water table.
Removal of water from the landfill (in terms of surface water drainage) will provide the process with a
suitable feed material. It is more cost-effective to process the relatively wet material at a lower rate than to
use an additional drying step. The water contained in the soil as moisture is carried as steam from the TRM
into the process reactor and recovered in the scrubber. This water is filtered and carbon treated prior to being
stored in tanks for analysis. Once it has been shown to meet disposal criteria, it can be sewered or
discharged to open water. This is generally not a significant cost since the water is nominally free of
contaminants, other than a slight salt content.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 31
4.2 Viabilitv of Commercial-Scale Operations
The viability of the ECO LOGIC Process from a destruction efficiency standpoint is well-documented by
numerous treatability studies, pilot-scale demonstration testing for Environment Canada and the US EPA
and commercial-scale regulatory testing for government agencies in Canada and Australia. Results for the
pilot-scale testing program on Warren County landfill soil confirmed the results from these previous
demonstration tests.
The ability of the commercial-scale TRM to treat soil was demonstrated at General Motors of Canada
Limited (GMCL) in St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada. Although desorption criteria were met during this
demonstration, materials handling and some mechanical difficulties prevented processing rates from reaching
design throughputs for a sustained period. These issues are being addressed prior to relocating the TRM to
a decommissioned General Electric Canada Inc. plant to process approximately 7000 tons of PCB
contaminated soil currently stored above-ground. A commercial-scale remediation project at the Warren
County Landfill site processing soil will benefit from the operational experience gained from the
commercial-scale unit being utilized for these projects.
Based on the commercial-scale experience to date, the greatest potential uncertainty for full-scale operations
is the ability of the feed system to input Warren County Landfill soil into the TRM at a continuos, design
throughput. It is recommended that commercial-scale feed system trials be conducted on a small amount
of excavated material at an early stage of mobilization/commissioning of any future contract. This would
enable ECO LOGIC to determine which of several designs is most appropriate and to demonstrate the
capability to feed this particular waste matrix.
4.3 Scale-up Factors
Scale-up factors for key TRM design criteria are presented in Table 18, with the pilot-scale and commercial-
scale parameters and the ratio of commercial-to pilot-scale. In comparing mill size factors, the length used
was the inside mill length available for milling to occur. The LID ratio for the commercial-scale mill is
lower than that for the pilot-scale system, but at 5.21, is high enough to ensure uni-direction flow.
Heat transfer comparisons were based on mill throughputs of IO lbs/hr at pilot-scale and I 00 tons/day at
commercial-scale. The mill surface area available for heat transfer is 336 times greater for the commercial-
scale mill compared to the pilot-scale. Surface area to volume ratios, which must be considered in
convective heat transfer calculations, indicate that the gas passing through the pilot-scale system would be
heated at a higher rate than the gas passing though the commercial-scale system. This is compensated by
the gas residence time, which is twice as long for commercial-scale compared to pilot-scale.
The mill casing, which contains the molten tin and the mill, has an outer surface area approximately 170
times larger at commercial-scale than pilot-scale. Due to the high thermal conductivity of the tin-steel
interfaces, the limiting heat transfer interface is the steel-dry soil interface. The surface area of the mill is
therefore much more important than the surface area of the mill casing. This is shown in the heat transfer
factors section of Table 18, where the mill heat flux is greater than the casing heat flux for both systems.
The commercial-scale to pilot-scale ratio for the mill heat flux is 1.6, indicating somewhat more heat transfer
per square foot is required at commercial-scale. Experience at commercial scale has proven that the higher
heat flux is readily attainable.
While the rotational speed of the pilot-scale mill was 3.3 times faster than for the commercial-scale system,
the velocity of the balls over the inner surface of the mill is 2.3 times higher at commercial-scale. This
indicates that more milling would occur at commercial-scale for the same ball charge per unit of waste. A
lower ball charge may be necessary to prevent excessive milling. The faster speed of the mill inner surface
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 32
also tends to increase the speed of the movement of solids towards the exit end for the commercial-scale
mill.
The gas flow through the mill is primarily steam resulting from the moisture content of the waste. The data
presented in the table is based on a waste moisture content of 40% weight basis, which is higher than the
average moisture content of the Warren County Landfill samples received. The gas residence time in the
mill would thus be greater than shown for the lower moisture contents, and the gas velocities would be lower.
Waste moisture content also influences the heat transfer requirements of the system. The 40% value was
used to model a mixture of landfill waste excavated from above and below the water table.
4.4 Capabilities to Provide Full-Scale Equipment
ECO LOGIC currently has one commercial-scale plant operating in Western Australia, one plant being
relocated from a General Motors site near St. Catharines, Ontario to a General Electric site in Toronto, and
one plant partially constructed destined for another Toronto site. Depending on the timing of a contract
award, ECO LOGIC could either relocate an existing North American plant, or construct a new plant to
service the Warren County Landfill project. Since the design and construction drawings are all complete
for the commercial-scale plants, the construction of a new plant is not a prolonged affair, typically requiring
six months. During the six month construction period prior to arrival of the new unit, activities such as
permitting, community consultation, project planning and site preparation could be underway.
4.5 Economic Estimates for Full-Scale Treatment
The cost of processing the Warren County Landfill soil will be accurately determined as part of the Phase
II activities. Based on information gained from the pilot-scale study, and current commercial-scale
operations, the per ton processing price is estimated to be $300 to $350. This is based on processing 100-120
tons per day with a 70-80% availability, with the processing portion of the project thus lasting 90-123 weeks.
To allow for ease of comparison with other technologies, this price does not include costs for activities
common to all technologies, such as permitting, public consultation, excavation, performance testing or
disposal of processed solids. These costs would be negotiated between the prime contractor and the state,
with limited cost control by ECO LOGIC. The costs that ECO LOGIC does have direct control over, and
to which this estimate applies, include system mobilization and commissioning, all waste preparation and
processing, lab costs for process outputs analysis, and system demobilization.
The ECO LOGIC Process and TRM soil processing unit do not require extensive pre-processing of the soil
to operate effectively. The soil must be screened to remove oversize material, but no dewatering is required.
Oversize material is defined in terms of the feed mechanism, which would probably be either a ram feeder
or a double intermeshed auger system. For a ram feeder, the oversize criteria would be material greater than
four inches diameter, and for the auger system, material greater than one inch diameter. Oversize material
would either be crushed and processed in the TRM or treated in the SBV as bulk solids. The results of
screening the soil indicated that the oversize material represents a very small portion of the total amount of
waste requiring treatment.
The ability to process wet material provides an economic benefit and also avoids potential environmental
emission problems. The amount of moisture in the soil is one criteria that influences throughput, as
additional moisture requires more heat input to the system per unit of waste. As a result, the soil from below
the water table will be processed at a slower rate than that from above the water table, unless it has dried
somewhat after being excavated. It is still more cost-effective to process at a lower rate than to use a drying
step. The water contained in the soil as moisture is ultimately recovered in the scrubber, filtered, carbon
treated, stored in tanks for analysis, and then sewered or discharged to open water. This is generally not a
significant cost relative to the overall cost of processing.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC Phase I Pilot-scale Testing Final Report -Warren County Landfill Page 33
Table 18 TRM SCALE-UP FACTORS FROM PILOT-SCALE TO COMMERCIAL-SCALE
Factor Units Pilot-Scale Commercial-Scale Ratio
Mill Size Factors
Length in 39 250 6.41
Inside Diameter in 6.00 46.5 7.75
Outside Diameter in 6.63 48 7.24
LID Ratio 5.88 5.21 0.89
Outer Surface Area sq. in 1,346 452,389 335.99
Internal Volume cu. in 490 424,557 866.29
Surface Area/Volume L/in 2.75 1.07 0.39
Ball Diameter m 2 2 1.00
Mill Casing Size Factors
Length in 41 255 6.22
Outside Diameter in 10.75 56 5.21
Outer Surface Area sq.in 3,721 628,067 168.78
Internal Volume cu.in 773 616,902 798.24
Heat Transfer Factors
Casing Surface Area sq.in 3,721 628,067 168.78
Mill Rotational Speed rpm 20 6 0.30
Miller Inner Surface Speed fpm 31.42 73.04 2.33
Feed Throughput lb/min 0.17 139 816.99
WCL Feed Heating Load Btu/lb 689 689 1.00
Average Residence Time mm 10 15 1.50
Average Solids Velocity in/min 4.1 17 4.15
Mill Heat Flux Btu/hr-sq.ft 225 365 1.62
Casing Heat Flux Btu/hr-sq.ft 82 263 3.23
Gas Flow Factors At 300°C
Sweep gas Flowrate cfm 3.00 210 70.00
Steam Flowrate cfm 4.27 3,488 816.99
Hydrocarbon Flowrate cfm 0.-43 349 816.99
Mill Residence time sec 1.58 3.28 2.07
Peak Gas Velocity fpm 49.67 382.03 7.69
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
ONTARIO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BOARD
HEARING DECISION DOCUMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--»~ •. ~fm>=9i-oi -~--. ----I>:?~~-.:~---._ •. --.-,..-. ·. -:·~.,~~r~~i~1~af;f}~{~~::~~--~·' =:~-• :_ ih'i.AD~lNG!tELI~ECO-·LOGIC ~"TElu~ATIONAL:INC:-:·--: -~~ :~~;~~~~;i~i§g~_i~~Irt3fuin~nng ~)va51i::i::;;}f~:t:~;~~~-:::~~:~~: :~·:-·~ :--.-. ·.-_:_._-;;:;:~~ECO·LOGICs,Mo_bile PCB Destructor .... --: . -~",1!\:1111 tti~I~;k~~ DEC;:~;;1:i:grf ,:,i
I ~'&~~ffe'~~~~~7~;ti~jl;"$~~1f.~:jc:. ........ :i.....u
---~ '
--~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPEARAi'l'CES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
REASONS FOR DECISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.1 History of the Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.2 The Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.3 Community Involvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. 4 The Hearing Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. ECO LOGIC'S TECHNOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. BOARD'S REVIE"W OF THE AGREEI\'IENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.1 Protocol for Consideration of Agreements Among Panies . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4. 2 Outstanding Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.3 Factors Considered in Approval
5. THE DECISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
APPENDICES
1. Terms and Conditions for Provisional Cenificate of Approval For Waste Disposal Site No.
A290030
2. Terms and Conditions for Provisional Cenificate of Approval for Waste Management
System No. A841531
3. Exhibit List
4. Description of the ECO LOGIC Process, excerpt from Exhibit 5
5. Statement of Great Lakes United and Greenpeace Canada, October 29, 1996
6. Protocol for Consideration of Agreements Among Panies
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EP-96-01
IN TI-IE ~l-\TTER OF an application from General Electric Canada Inc. and ELI Eco
Logic International Inc. (ECO LOGIC) for the treatment of PCB waste materials stored
at 940 Lansdowne Avenue in Toronto using the ECO LOGIC mobile, non-incineration,
PCB treatment facility.
AND IN THE MATTER of the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E-19
and the Intervenor Funding Project Act, R.S.O. 1990 c, I-13 .
APPEARA.i'l CES
Douglas Thomson
Joseph Castrilli
David Crocker
Paul Muldoon and Rarnani Nadarajah
Jack Coop
Constance Marlatt
General Electric Canada Inc.
EU Eco Logic International Inc.
(ECO LOGIC)
GE Task Force Community
Residents
Bloor-Junction Neighbourhood
Coalition Inc.
Great Lakes United, Great Lakes
United (Canada) and Greenpeace
(Canada)
Ministry of Environment and Energy
City of Toronto
-2 -EP-96-01
REASONS FOR DECISION
1. INTRODUCTION
In February 1996 the Environment.al Assessment Board was required by the Director of the
Approvals Branch, Ministry of the Environment and Energy, to hold a public hearing under
section 30 (1) of the Environmental Protection Act. The subject of the hearing was an
application, dated February 16. 1996, from General Electric Canada Inc. (GECI) and Eli Eco
Logic International Inc. (ECO LOGIC) for approval to destroy polychlorinated biphenyl
(PCB) wastes currently stored at a former GECI manufacruring plant located at 940
Lansdowne A venue (the site) in Toronto. The proposed treaanent would be carried out by
ECO LOGIC using its mobile PCB waste processing facility that would be set up to operate
temporarily inside the plant where the wastes are stored.
A hearing panel of two members of the board was appointed to hold a public hearing on the
application and a preliminary hearing was held on April 24. 1996. The formal hearing was
convened on October 28-29, 1996 and concluded in an agreement among the parties on the
terms and conditions under which the application could proceed.
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 History of the Problem
GECI used PCBs in some transformers manufacrured at its large, industrial site, 940
Lansdowne Avenue, from 1942 until the company voluntarily discontinued their use in
1977. The use of PCB oil was banned by the federal government in 1980 and G ECI
stopped manufacturing transformers on the site in 1982.
The company submitted that soil in the southeast portion of the property. and in a small
area along the adjacent railway line, was "'impacted" by PCBs. These soils were
excavated and stored. GECI sold the property to Canada Square Development
Corporation in 1985, but retained responsibility for cleaning up the contaminated soil.
In 1991 , a chemical destruction process approved by the MOEE was used to destroy
3,000 gallons of PCB contaminated 1 iquid.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.2
- 3 -EP-96-01
Some bulk solid material such as railway ties, concrete, ballasts. capacitors and
rransforrners are also contaminated by PCBs and require treaunent. All of the waste to
be treated. the preponderance of which is the excavated soil, is being scored inside
Buildings 18 (a huge factory 600 feet tong and 120 feet wide fronting on Lansdowne
Avenue) and 36 (an adjacent small warehouse).
The proposal is to use the ECO LOGIC process to clean up the PCB contaminated soils
and material stored in Buildings 18 and 36. The Board saw the scored wastes when it
visited the site on October 28, 1996. GECI has retained offices and personnel in
Building 18 to supervise the security of the site and the destruction of the wastes, which
will take place indoors in Building 18.
The community is concerned, and the company does not deny, that the cleanup of the
stored wastes is not the end of the problem and that more remediation beneath the
buildings may be required. The community is also concerned that the present owner of
the property is not a party to the hearing.
The Application
GECI and ECO LOGIC applied to the Ministry of Environment and Energy for
Provisional Certificates of Approval for a waste management system and for a waste
disposal site for the destruction and decontamination of PCB wastes.
The wastes to be treated in the application are restricted to those presently scored m
Buildings 18 and 36 and specified (with representative PCB concentrations) as follows:
1. 6,400,000 kg of soil (180 ug/g of PCBs, bulk average for soil)
2. 80,000 kg of drummed soil (200,000 ug/g of PCBs)
3. 65,000 kg of concrete (575 ug/g of PCBs)
4 . 120,000 kg of asphalt (14 ug/g of PCBs)
5. 10,000 kg of wood (3,300 ug/g of PCBs)
6 . 90 drums of filters (26,000 ug/g of PCBs)
7.
8.
9 .
10.
13 drums of liquid (14 ug/g of PCBs )
10 drums of sludge and oil (3,000 ug/g of PCBs)
1 drum of oil from tank #1 (780 ug/g of PCBs)
8 drums of mortar and brick (670 ug/g of PCBs )
2.3
11.
12 .
13.
14 .
15 .
16.
17.
18.
19.
-4 -EP-96-01
15 drums of gloves and miscellaneous items (3,000 ug/g of PCBs)
59 drums of ballast capacitors
4 transformers each weighing 1,000 kg
3 drums of glass and ceramics
1 drum of si4cone
320 kg (8) tree roots (20 ug /g of PCBs)
383 empty drums (3,300 ug/g of PCBs)
24,000 kg sewer cleaning residue (2,200 ug/g of PCBs)
10,000 kg miscellaneous and equipment (includes motors. pipes, pumps, etc.)
from basement of Building 36 (21,500 ug/g of PCBs)
In the board's view, the application does not permit the destruction of wastes not
presently stored in Buildings 18 and 36 and specified above (see condition 23 of site
approval). If there has been a minor miscounting in the list of wastes. the applicants can
correct such a discrepancy through the Director of Approvals and in consultation with
the Community Liaison Committee. The applicants' response to the community's
concern about the possibility of off-site wastes being transported to the 940 Lansdowne
Avenue site for destruction is discussed below in "outstanding issues".
Community Involvement
Approximately 3,500 residents living nearest to the site have been identified as the
community of concern about the PCB contamination at the site. The applicants have
given priority to these residents for receiving notice and consulting on solutions co the
problem, but people with concerns living fanher from the site do not appear to have been
precluded.
An Environment Liaison Commia.ee was formed by the Ministry of the Environment and
the City of Tororuo in 1983 . It held public information meetings on the progress of site
remediation.
In 1988 the GE Task Force was established by the City of Toronto Board of Health to
assess the clean-up options and the potential risks to the public and environmental health
implications of the clean-up options, and to undertake a comprehensive public
involvement program co ensure community input into the decision-making process. The
GE Task Force drew members from the local community , GECI. the Ministry of the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.4
- 5 -EP-96-01
Environment, the Board of Health and the Ward 12 Councillor among others. Its term
was planned to expire November 30, 1997.
The new ECO LOGIC process was discussed at GE Task Force meetings in 1990 and
the company made a presentation to the Task Force in 1993. By 1995 the technology
was fully operational and reviewed favourably by the Task Force.
The community residents on the GE Task Force and a second residents' group, the
Bloor-Junction Neighbourhood Coalition Inc., were parties to the hearing and shared
intervenor funding for the purpose of hiring experts to review the applications. Both
groups were sufficiently satisfied with the technical merits of the proposal to reach an
agreement with the applicant on the terms and conditions under which the destruction of
the PCBs could proceed.
The Hearing Process
At the preliminary hearing in April the board directed the parties to engage in discussions
and negotiations focussed on identifying and addressing the issues in dispute. The board
assigned the two community groups responsibility for dealing with site specific
community impacts and Great Lakes United/Greenpeace was designated to deal with
technology issues.
The board was impressed with the constructive, problem-solving approach with which
the GE Task Force Community Residents, the Bloor-Junction Neighbourhood Coalition
Inc. and Great Lakes United/Greenpeace Canada and the proponents approached the
hearing. The parties avoided adopting an initial position of total opposition to the
proposal and instead sought means of testing the evidence behind the applicant's
conclusion that the PCBs could be safely destroyed onsite by ECO LOGIC's process.
Toe motivation of the parties gave impetus to the hearing process to find solutions. The
experience of the board in recent years is that anempts by parties to negotiate senlement
of some or all of their outstanding disputes often results in outcomes acceptable to all the
interests represented at a hearing. The older legalistic, adversarial hearing model holds
the risk of leading to "winner take all" decisions that are not in the long-term interest of
a community. This hearing was one of the last co which the now defunct Inrervenor
Fun.ding Project Act applied. A funding hearing in May l996 resulted in the award of
-6 -EP-96-01
$26,072.69 to the three intervenors -the Task Force Residents. the Bloor-Junction
Coalition and Great Lakes United/Greenpeace.
The purpose of the Phase 1 fund ing was to ass ist the two community groups m co-
ordinating their efforts and allow them to retain consultants to determine and scope the
issues as much as possible. Phase 2 funding of S68,988.00 was awarded to the
iruervenors on the basis of an agreement in which the funding proponent and the panies
settled most of the funding issues before the funding hearing held in June 1996.
The board observes that the parties' agreement on funding again demonstrated their
motivation to find their own solutions within the hearing process.
Other aspects of the hearing process included GECI and ECO LOGIC providing written
responses to the interrogatories of the panies on May 27. 1996. The board and the
panies travelled to St. Catharines on July 19. 1996 to see the ECO LOGIC process in
operation destroying PCB wastes at the General Motors plant and the new Thermal
Reduction Mill, which was in the final stages of assembly . In the months following the
preliminary hearing in October, and up to and during the main October hearing, the
parties met with facilitators from the board and on their own co explore the possibilities
and eventually the settlement of the issues in dispute.
3. ECO LOGIC'S TECHNOLOGY
Since 1986, ECO LOGIC has been developing a patented chemical reduction process,
not involving incineration, for destroying a variety of persistent toxic organic wastes
including PCBs.
The ECO LOGIC process involves the gas-phase reduction of organic compounds by
hydrogen at temperatures of 850 degrees Celsius or higher. Chlorinated hydrocarbons,
such as PCBs and dioxins, are chemically reduced to methane and hydrogen chloride
while non-chlorinated organic contaminants, such as pol yaromatic hydrocarbons (P AHs)
are reduced substantially to methane and small amounts of other light hydrocarbons. The
hydrogen chloride can then be recovered as acid or neutralized by scrubbing . No
formation of furans or dioxins occurs. ECO LOGIC describes its process as '"closed
loop ", which eliminates the potential for uncontrolled air emissions such as those
associated with incinerators.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.
- 7 -EP-96-01
The ECO LOGIC process is mobile: the equipment is mounted on highway trailers that
are hauled to the location where the wastes are to be desuoyed. The reactor is called the
SE25 ELI Destructor. The PCB wastes are fed into the reactor through proprietary
ancillary technologies: an atomizing nozzle system handles liquid PCBs, the Thermal
Reduction Mill (TR..t\1) desorbs PCBs from soil, and the Sequencing Batch Vaporizer
(SBV) handles PCBs in bulk solids (i.e., ballasts, transformers and drums).
A detailed description of ECO LOGIC' s process and schematics of the entire system are
shown in Appendix 4 (attached).
Extensive testing at laboratory, pilot and commercial scale have been conducted on ECO
LOGIC's process. This work has been supported by the National Research Council, the
Canadian Department of National Defence, Environment Canada, the Ontario Ministry
of the Environment and Energy and the United States' Environmental Protection Agency.
Demonstration testing has been conducted in Australia and the United States and in
Canada at Hamilton Harbour and the General Motors of Canada Limited plant in St.
Catharines. ECO LOGIC has submitted that the testing data demonstrate that its
technology will operate satisfactorily to warrant approval at the 940 Lansdowne site.
All outputs of gases, liquids and solids are stored and tested before on or off-site reuse
or disposal. Product gas is recycled within the system. The treated soil and sediment
is a fine, inert, silica-rich material that will be sent to a licensed landfill for use as a
daily cover. Treated metals (i.e., transformers, capacitators, drums) will be offered co
recycling companies or land filled if no salvage value is identified. Hydrochloric acid
is subjected to granular activated carbon filtration and then offered to local industries.
During normal operations, approximately 11,0CX) gallons of water will be produced daily.
Water is treated with granular activated carbon. The treated scrubber water will be
discharged to the municipal combined sewer only after the analytical sampling results
showing it meets the discharge criteria have been given to the City of Toronto City
Works Services and the Metro Toronto Works Department and the latter has provided
approval.
BOARD'S REVIEW OF THE AGREEMENT
The agreements negotiated between the applicants, GECI and ECO LOGIC, and the other
parties co the hearing are contained in the Certificates of Approval attached as
Appendices l and 2.
4.1
-8 -EP-96-01
Protocol for Consideration of Agreements Among Parties
The board encourages parties to find agreemenc on disputed issues so that the costs and
inefficiencies of lengthy, adversarial hearings can be minimized and, most importantly,
the affected communiry can have a direct influence on the decision to proceed with a
project. The board's protocol on agreements is attached as Appendix 6.
Although the panies to the GECI/ECO LOGIC hearing have successfully negotiated an
agreement allowing the destruction of PCBs at the 940 Lansdowne A venue site to take
place, the board will accept the agreement only if the regulatory requirements, in this
case of the Environmental Protection Act, have been met . The board, therefore, has
carefully reviewed all of the evidence submitted by the applicants and the panies.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.2 Outstanding Issues
I
Although negotiations between the parties have proven to be very successful, two issues
of importance to the communiry groups remain unresolved. The issues are: I
1. placing an information/warning sign on the Lansdowne Avenue side of Building 18;
and
2. ensuring that the site and technology will not be used for the destruction of
contaminated material brought from an off-site location by requiring that: "The
Company shall inform. seek input and obtain the consent of the Cornrnuniry Liaison
Committee before seeking approval for the destruction of PCBs or PCB waste at
the site, other than the PCBs or PCB waste described" in the Provisional Certificate
of Approval; and "The Cornrnuniry Liaison Committee shall advise the Director
with respect to whether approval shall be given for the destruction of any PCBs or
PCB waste at the site other than the PCBs or PCB waste described ~ in the
Provisional Certificate of Approval (Exhibit 19).
Mr. Crocker explained that the sign would be an addidonal source of information for the
public and the communiry about what is happening in Building 18. He requested that the
board make the sign a Condition of Approval.
Mr. Thomson said that ECO LOGIC has approached the owners of Building 18 . Canada
Square Development Corporation. about the sign and that Canada Square has indicated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
that it does not want a sign on its building. Mr. Thomson suggested to the board that I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 9 -EP-96-01
it could not compel Canada Square, which 1s not a pany to the applications under
consideration, to place a sign on its building.
The board agrees that it cannot compel Canada Square to put a sign on its building, a
sign that could provide useful information to the general public. However, the board feels
that the agreed-upon communications plan contained in the Provisional Certificate of
Approval provides ample opportunity for people to learn about, and be kept up to date
on, the destruct.ion activities ta.king place in Building 18.
On the second issue, Mr. Crocker indicated that ensuring that no PCBs or PCB
contaminated materials, other than those approved at this hearing, are or can be brought
from an off-site location for destruction on the site is a major unresolved issue for the
community. He submined the wording reproduced above for additional conditions of
approval to address the community's concern.
Mr. Muldoon added that his clients would noc have given their support to the project
(Exhibit 18) if there was any possibility that PCBs or PCB contaminated materials other
than those agreed upon by the panies is to be destroyed at the site by ECO LOGIC.
In response, Mr. Thomson provided two letters.
A letter from General Electric Canada Inc. (Exhibit 21) guarantees a consultative role
for the Community Liaison Committee on any activities the company may envision for
the site. A lener from ECO LOGIC (Exhibit 20) guarantees the community that ECO
LOGIC neither plans nor will allow its technology to be used for the destruction of off-
site PCBs or PCB contaminated materials.
Mr. Thomson reminded the board that Divisional Court (Exhibit 22) has ruled that a
board cannot prevent a proponent from filing an application for a Certificate of Approval.
Toe coUrt's ruling, along with the two letters of assurance, Mr. Thomson suggests, make
the conditions of approval requested by the community ·groups unnecessary. In any case.
he said the board could not provide the Community Liaison Committee with the consent
authority it is seeking as this authority will essentially prevent General Electric Canada
Ltd. and/or ECO LOGIC from filing applications for Certificates of Approval.
The board agrees that it does not have the jurisdiction to prevent future applications
through a veto power exercised by the Community Liaison Committee. (Subsequent
communication on this matter between the panies has not changed the board's opinion.)
-10 -EP-96-01
The board is pleased to report that the terms of reference for the Community Liaison
Committee (Certificate of Approval condition 41h) have been revised to include a role
for the Comminee should the applicants "seek approval to destroy waste or material at
the site other than PCB waste/material generally described in conditions 22 and 23 hereof
. and shall seek input from the Committee before making such application."
4.3 Factors Considered in Approval
1. The ECO LOGIC process appears to be an effective method of treating PCB wastes
at this site. Relying on the data it has submitted, ECO LOGIC claims that the
destruction removal efficiencies for PCBs in the reactor are 99. 9999 % or better
(Exhibit 5, Appendices C, D, E). The PCBs are treated in the gas phase in the
reactor and, therefore, this destruction efficiency applies to all PCB wastes
contained in soil, liquids and bulk solids. A review of these data by experts
retained by the parties appears to support ECO LOGIC's claims.
2. ECO LOGIC has submitted that the destruction removal efficiencies and other
aspects of the proposed operation meet or exceed all applicable regulatory
requirements. The MOEE has taken the position that the application satisfies the
requirements of provincial regulations for air pollution (0. Reg. 3/16), for general
waste management (0. Reg. 34), for noise standards (Publication NPC-205) and,
with one exception, for mobile PCB destruction facilities (0. Reg. 352 and Details
Document, April 1986).
The exception is the 250 metre setback requirement in Regulation 352. Some
buildings are closer to the site boundary but because of the type of wastes and ilie
levels of PCBs to be destroyed by the ECO LOGIC process and the requirements
for operation and monitoring, the parties have agreed to support a one-time
exemption from the Regulation by an Order-in-Council that will not apply to other
technologies or situations.
The proposal also satisfies municipal noise and sewage bylaws with the provisions
in the Certificates of Approval.
3. The provisions in the Certificates of Approval protect the environment. ECO
LOGIC must comply with detailed and extensive sampling, testing, monitoring and
reporting requirements. For example, there is extensive pre-testing of the wastes
and the system before normal operations will be allowed to proceed and the system
will automatically shut down if operating parameters are not met.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-11 -EP-96-01
Any substances that are released during the process will be present m small
amounts that are in conformity with the regulations.
4. The interests of the community appear to be protected. There is a need to destroy
the PCB wastes in storage before further remediation of the site can proceed. The
community has invested many years working with GECI and provincial and
municipal agencies to identify the best technology available to destroy the stored
wastes. The Certificates of Approval give the community a continuing role in
being informed and consulted about the descruction operations. A Community
Liaison Committee is being established to provide advice on project implementation
and communications.
ECO LOGIC's operation is restricted to approximately 8 months (2 months to
assemble the technology, 5 months to destroy the wastes, and one month to
disassemble and quit the site) and the wastes to be destroyed are restricted to those
specified in the site Certificate of Approval. The community will no longer have
to live with uncertainty, nor will the site become a permanent waste site as a
consequence of this approval to destroy the PCB wastes presently stored on the site.
The panel was particularly persuaded by the agreement of the GE Task Force
Community Residents and the Bloor-Junction Neighbourhood Coalition Inc. to
allow the GECI/ECO LOGIC application to proceed within the restrictions of the
Certificates of Approval. This agreement was the culmination of many years of
volunteer commitment by numerous individuals searching for a solution to the
problem and, more recently, their participation in intensive negotiations underway
since April, 1996 to finally determine the plans to proceed.
5. The panel finds the position of Great Lakes United and Greenpeace Canada in
raising no objections to an approval to be persuasive. As described in their
statement (Appendix 5), these parties undertook an extensive evaluation process
involving the review of ECO LOGIC's technology by four technical experts to
conclude that this technology is the '"better of possible options". These parties were
also successful in obtaining major improvements in the Certificates of Approval.
The panel understands that Great Lakes United and Greenpeace Canada's support
of this application is qualified because the ECO LOGIC technology results in the
release of minute quantities of toxic substances. Great Lakes United and
Greenpeace Canada maintain their unwavering commianent to virtual elimination
-12 -EP-96-01
(i.e., the goal of zero discharge) of persiscent coxic substances as defined by the
International Joint Commission and the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.
Their main objective is ensuring that .. the use and production, whether intentionally
or unintentionally, of persistent coxic substances and substances that cause lethal or
sublethal harm to human and non-human health is phased-out".
For these reasons, the panel is satisfied with the agreement reached by the parties and
described in the Certificates of Approval, and approves the application.
5. THE DECISION
The panel approves the application from General Electric Canada Inc. (GECI) and Eli Eco
Logic International Inc. (ECO LOGIC) to destroy the known and already categorized waste
materials presently stored in Buildings 18 and 36 at 940 Lansdowne A venue in the City of
Toronto using ECO LOG I C's mobile, PCB wasce processing facility, subject to the
conditions and related schedules set out in the Certificates of Approval for Waste Disposal
Site ( NO. A290030) and Waste Management System ( NO. A841531) comprising Appendix
1 and Appendix 2 of this decision.
DA TED at TORONTO this 25th DAY of NOVEMBER, 1996.
Anne Koven, Chair
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TER}lfS AND CONDITIONS
for
APPENDIX 1
PROVISIONAL CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
to
DESTROY or DECONTAMINATE PCB WASTE
at:
Davenpon Industrial Complex
940 Lansdowne A venue
City of Toronto
uszng:
ECO LOGIC's MOBILE PCB DESTRUCTOR
November 14, 1996
Applicants:
General Electric Canada Inc
2300 Meadowvale Blvd.
Mississauga, Ontario
L5N 5P9
and
ELI Eco Logic International Inc. (ECO LOGIC)
143 Dennis Street
Rockwood, Ontario
NOB 2KO
November 14, 1996 -TERi\1S AND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC/(;ENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
PAGE I OF 13
PROPOSED TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Definitions
1. For the purpose of this Certificate of Approval:
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
"Act" means the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E-19, as
amended;
"Application" n:,eans the Application for a Certificate of Approval for
Destruction of PCBs Using Mobile Technology submitted by ELI Eco Logic
International Inc. (ECO LOGIC) and General Electric of Canada Inc. dated
February 16, 1996 and signed by K. Elizabeth KUmmling and Harvey Lee.
"Certificate" means this Certificate of Approval No. 290030 issued in
accordance with Section 27 of the Act,
"Companies" means ELI Eco Logic International lnc.(ECO LOGIC)and
General Electric Canada Inc. (ECO LOGIC and General Electric Canada Inc.
are not related companies);
"Destructor' means the ECO LOGIC Mobile Hazardous Waste Destructor
consisting of a reactor, a recirculating gas heater, a catalytic steam refom,er,
a thermal reduction mill, a sequencing batch vaporizer, scrubber system, gas
compressors, gas storage, a boiler, a vaporizer and auxiliary equipment all
as described in the Application and supporting documentation listed in
Schedule "A" of this Certificate;
"Director'' means the Ministry Director of Approvals;
"District Manager'' means the District Manager, Metropolitan Toronto District
Office of the Central Region of the Ministry;
"Point of Impingement" means a point where the maximum concentration of
a contaminant in air emitted from the Destructor is calculated in accordance
with Ontario Regulation 346 or an alternate method acceptable to the
Director;
"Product Gas Storage Area" means the area which contains the product gas
storage tank outside Building 18 at the Site;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
November 14. 1996 -TER.i\1S AlvD CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC/GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA IN C.
PAGE 2 OF 13
(10) "Publication NPC-103" means Publication NPC-103 of the Model Municipal
Noise Control By-Law, Final Report, August, 1978, as amended;
(11) "Publication NPC-205" means Publication NPC-205 , Sound Level Limits for
Stationary Sources in Class 1 & 2 Areas (Urban), October, 1995;
(12) "Publication NPC-223" means Publication NPC-233, Information to be
Submitted for Approval of Stationary Sources of Sound, October 1995.
(13) "Manager'' means the Manager, Environmental Engineering Services
Section, Science and Technology Branch, of the Ministry, or any other
person who represents and carries out the duties of the Manager,
Environmental Engineering Services Section, Science and Technology
Branch of the Ministry, as those duties relate to the conditions of this
Certificate;
(14) "Ministry" means the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Energy;
(15) "PCBs" means polychlorinated biphenyls;
(16) "PCB waste" means PCB equipment and/or PCB liqu id and/or PCB material
as defined in Ontario Regulation 362, R.R.O. 1990;
(17) "Publication NPC-205" means Publication NPC-205, Sound Level Limits for
Stationary Sources in Class 1 & 2 Areas (Urban), October 1995;
(18) "SBV' means Sequencing Batch Vapourizer as described in Item 1 of
Schedule "A" to this Certificate;
(19) "Site" means Buildings 18 and 36 at the former Davenport industrial complex
of General Electric Canada Inc. at 940 Lansdowne Avenue, City of Toronto,
as depicted in Volume B -Site of Item 1 of Schedule "A" to this certificate;
(20) "Treated Materials" means the residual solid material following treatment of
the PCB waste in the Destructor.
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
1
2.
3.
4.
November 14, 1996 -TERA1S AND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC/GENERAL ELECIRIC CANADA INC.
PAGE 3 OF 13
The Companies shall notify the Director and the Medical Officer of Health of the City
of Toronto in advance of commencing waste processing at the Site.
This certificate expires October 31, 1997.
The Director may extend the expiry date of this Certificate in case of late arrival of
the Destructor to the Site or mechanical malfunctions of the Destructor or delays
due to other circumstances which are beyond the reasonable control of the
Companies.
( 1)
(2)
The Site shall be established, used, operated and maintained in accordance
with the terms and conditions herein, the Application and supporting
information, as amended by documentation listed in Schedule "A"
(Application as amended) and any other documentation listed in Schedule
"A".
In interpreting the obligations under 4.(1 ), any conflict or ambiguity which
arises shall be resolved by referring to:
(a) these terms and conditions where the conflict arises between a term
and condition and the Application as amended;
(b)
(c)
these terms and conditions where a conflict arises between a term
and condition and Schedule "A";
the document with the most recent date where a conflict or ambiguity
arises between or among documents in Schedule "A".
5. Nothing in this approval dispenses with the Companies' duty to comply with the Act,
the Ontario Waters Resources Act and the regulations and any order made
thereunder.
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
6. ( 1) General Electric Canada Inc. shall maintain financial assurance in the total
amount of $500,000 , to be filed with the Director prior to commencement of
operations at the site. The security must be in the form of Irrevocable Letter
of Credit issued by a Bank in the form annexed as Schedule "B" or other form
otherwise satisfactory to the Director;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(2)
November 14, 1996 -TER}.1S AND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC/GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
PAGE 4 OF 13
The letter of credit can terminate only after the Destructor has been removed
from the Site and the Director has established that no remedial measures as
a result of activities subject to this approval are required and so notified the
Companies in writing.
GENERAL SITE OPERATIONS
7. The Companies shall:
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
conduct the Destructor and related operations in a manner which ensures
that there are no adverse effects resulting from such operation;
maintain adequate ventilation within Building 18 using the present ventilation
system for incoming air and discharging the air from the building through an
opening on the southwest roof register; this register shall be equipped with
a suitable dust filter, acceptable to the Ministry, which shall be changed as
required;
take appropriate measures to minimize emissions of air contaminants during
loading, transportation, treatment and unloading of PCB waste within the
Site;
take appropriate measures to prevent spills from the vehicles transporting
waste from Building #36 to Building #18;
keep dust emissions from the stockpiled soil storage areas at a minimum
during loading and any other activities which may result in uncontrolled
emissions;
take appropriate remedial action if at any time, problems such as dust,
odours, noise or other nuisances are generated at the Site; and
ensure that all vehicles are inspected and cleaned if necessary, prior to
leaving the Site, as set out in Item 3 of Schedule "A".
Site Inspections
8. The Companies shall ensure that the Site is inspected daily by qualified personnel
for spills/discharges or any equipment deteriorations or process failures which may
November 14, 1996 -TER.iWS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC/GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
PAGE 5 OF 13
cause an adverse effect, and to ensure that the Site is being operated in accordance
with this Certificate. The Companies shall promptly remedy any malfunction and/or
deficiency which may cause an adverse effect.
Site Security
9. Entrances to Building #18 and Building #36 shall be equipped with key card entry.
10. The Product Gas Storage Area shall be surrounded with a fence at least 6 feet high
with gates that lock. The area shall be locked when not occupied, and shall be
checked daily for compliance.
11 . The fuel tank and process tanks shall be surrounded with a fence at least 6-foot high
with gates that lock. The area shall be locked when not occupied, and shall be
checked daily for compliance.
12. The Companies shall maintain exterior lights to adequately light the storage areas
described in conditions 10 and 11 .
Noise
13 . The Companies shall ensure that the noise emissions from the Site comply with the
limits set out in Publication NPC-205 where applicable.
14. Notwithstanding condition 13 the Companies shall ensure that the noise emissions
from the Site comply with Chapter 241 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.
15. A 3.8 metre high sound barrier, having a surface mass density of at least 20 kg/m2,
shall be constructed by the Companies around the outdoor compressor installation.
Access openings in the barrier shall be located and designed to not compromise
sound attenuation performance.
16. The Companies shall acoustically close off existing ventilation openings in Building
18 that are not used .
17. The Companies shall keep overhead doors closed at all times except when trucks
are entering or leaving the Building 18.
I
-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
November 14, 1996 -TERMS AN D CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC/GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA IN C.
PAGE 6 OF 13
18 . The Companies shall conduct transient operations to prepare material for
processing, such as breaking of concrete or cutting of metal transformer fins, which
have-the potential to create high sound levels, only on week days between 0800
hours and 1900 hours. These activities shall only take place within Building 18.
19. The Companies shall install appropriate silencers on the cooling towers , if required ,
satisfactory to Director.
20. The Companies shall carry out acoustic audit measurements on the actual noise
emissions due to the operation of the Destructor, including any intermittently
operated equipment, in accordance with procedures specified by Publication NPC-
103.
21 . The Company shall submit a report for the approval of the Director on the results of
an acoustic audit, prepared by an independent acoustic consultant acceptable to the
Director, in accordance with requirements of Publication NPC-233, to the District
Manager and the Director not later than four (4) weeks after commencement of
operations of the Destructor.
WASTE APPROVED FOR TREATMENT AT THE SITE
22 .
23 .
The PCB waste for wh ich treatment by the Destructor is approved by th is Certificate
is located within the boundaries of the former Davenport industrial complex of
General Electric Canada Inc. The Companies shall destroy pursuant to this
Certificate of Approval only the approximate quantities of PCB waste described in
Condition 23 hereof.
The approximate quantities of the PCB waste (with representative PCB
concentration shown in brackets) approved for treatment are as follows:
(1) 6,400,000 kg of soil (180 µg/g of PCBs)*;
(2) 80,000 kg of drummed soil (200 ,000 µgig of PCBs);
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
65,000 kg of concrete (575 µg/g of PCBs);
120,000 kg of asphalt (14 µg/g of PCBs):
10,000 kg of wood (3,300 µg /g of PCBs);
90 drums of filters (26,000 µgi g of PCBs);
November 14, 1996 -TERA1S AND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC/GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
(7)
(8)
13 drums of liquid (14 µgig of PCBs);
10 drums of sludge and oil (3,000 µg/g of PCBsr,
(9) 1 drum of oil from tank #1 (780 µg/g of PCBs);
(10) 8 drums of mortar and brick (670 µgig of PCBs);
PAGE 7 OF 13
(11) 15 drums of gloves and miscellaneous items (3,000 µg/g of PCBs);
(12) 59 drums of bal~ast capacitors;
(13) 4 transformers each weighing 1000 kg;
(14) 3 drums of glass and ceramics;
(15) 1 drum of silicone;
(16) 320 kg (8) tree roots (20 µgig of PCBs);
(17) 383 empty drums (3,300 µgig of PCBs);
(18) 24,000 kg sewer cleaning residue (2,200 µg/g of PCBs);
(19) 10,000 kg miscellaneous and equipment (includes motors, pipes, pumps, etc.)
from basement of Building #36 (21,500 µg/g of PCBs).
* Bulk average for soil
WASTE HANDLING
24 . (1) The untreated waste areas shall be surrounded with containment of sufficient
volume to contain all PCB liquid handled at any time.
(2) Transport of liquid waste on the Site should be carried out so as to minimize
evaporation and spills.
Disassembly of Transformers
I
-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
25 . The Companies shall carry out the disassembly of transformers in such a manner 1 as to minimize air emissions .
Transformers shall be;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(a)
(b)
(c)
November 14, 1996 -TERMS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC/GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
PAGE 8 OF 13
drained of any dielectric liqu id by pumping the liquid into drums or
other suitable containers;
opened, disassembled as necessary, and treated in the SBV; and
dielectric liquid shall be treated in the Destructor.
AMBIENT AIR MONITORING AND REPORTING
26. (1)
(2)
The Companies shall conduct pre-, post-and destruction-phase off-site
ambient air monitoring as identified in the Ambient Air Monitoring Program,
set out in Item 7 of Schedule "A";
The Companies shall notify the City of Toronto Environmental Protection
Office and the Manager, Environmental Health Services, Western Health
Area, as soon as is reasonably possible in the event of an exceedence of
POI standards, determined through the ambient air monitoring program.
MONITORING OF PCBs AND TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE
27 . The Company shall monitor PCBs and total suspended particulate from Building 18
by using a modified High-Vol sampler to collect 24-hour samples of air released from
Build ing #18 via the roof register during the following activities: handling of waste or
treated material, transportation of waste or treated materials and the operation of the
Destructor.
28. The High-Vol sampler required by condition 27 shall be placed at such a location
downstream of any fitter installed for the control of particulate emiss ions via the roof
register as to collect a sample representative of the emissions.
29. The Companies shall ensure that the sampling required by condition 27 is analyzed
for total PCBs including gaseous and particulate phase following an analytical
protocol to be formulated in consultation with the Manager and approved by the
Director.
30 . The Companies shall ensure that the first set of samples required by condition 27
are collected prior to any activities associated with PCB waste destruction for the
determination of background concentrations of total suspended particulates and
PCBs.
31 . The Companies shall determine the frequency of sampling required by cond ition 27
after consultation with the Director and report the results of sampling and analysis
as requi red by condition 27 at a frequency satisfactory to the Director.
November 14, 1996 -TER.J.\1S AND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC!trENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
PAGE 9 OF 13
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
32. The Companies shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that the Site and the
Destructor, equipment and services which are installed or used to achieve
compliance with this Certificate are properly operated and maintained at all times.
RECORD KEEPING AND COMPLAINTS
33. The Companies shall retain, for a minimum of seven (7) years from completion of
the project and site demobilization, all records and information related to or resulting
from the operation and maintenance required by this Certificate. These records
shall be made available to staff of the Ministry upon request. The Companies shall
retain:
34.
a.
b.
C.
all records on the maintenance, repair and inspection of the
Equipment and the Site;
the status of any abatement or remedial program arising from this
Certificate which has been approved or ordered by the Ministry;
all records of reportable discharges within the meaning of Section 13
of the Act, non-compliance with this Certificate or Provisional
Certificate of Approval for a Waste Management System No.
A841531, or complaints of adverse effects (collectively,
"occurrences"), including:
i. a description, time and date of the occurrence;
11. wind direction at the time of the occurrence; and
iii. a description of the measures taken to address the cause of
the occurrence and to prevent a similar occurrence in the
future: and
d. all records of movement of waste, treated solids and water from the
Site.
The Companies shall notify the District Manager, in writing, of each complaint and
the measures taken to address the cause of the complaint within two (2) business
days of the complaint.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
35.
November 14, 1996 -TER}dS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC/GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
PAGE 10 OF 13
The Companies shall implement the Emergency Response Plan set out in Appendix
1 of the Operations Health and Safety Plan (Item 5 of Schedule "A").
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
36 . The Companies shall conduct all operations on the Site in such a manner as to
ensure that the maximum concentration in air of a contam inant, set out in Column
1 of the Table in Schedule "C", at a Point of Impingement shall not be greater than
the concentration set out in Column 2 of the Table in Schedule "C".
TREATED MATERIALS
37 . All Treated Materials shall be removed from the Site, and testing and removal shall
be performed in accordance with the disposal requirements outlined in the Act and,
if required, Ontario Regulation 347, R.R.O. 1990, as amended.
38. Prior to discharge to the municipal sewer, treated scrubber water must meet the
following criteria:
( 1)
(2)
the concentration of PCBs in the water shall not exceed 5 µg/L (ppb);
the concentrations of all other compounds shall not exceed levels set out in
Item 3 of Schedule UA".
39 . Prior to discharge to the municipal sewer, the analytical sampling results of the
treated scrubber water will be provided to the City of Toronto City Works Services
and Metropolitan Toronto Works Department. Provided that the treated scrubber
effluent meets discharge criteria and once the analytical results have been provided
to these agencies, the stored treated scrubber effluent can be discharged to the
municipal sewer. Discharge of treated scrubber effluent from the Site will only be
allowed if these agencies have been provided the analytical results prior to
discharge, and Metropolitan Toronto Works Department has provided approval in
accordance with its normal operating procedures.
REPORTING
40. The Companies shall provide to the District Manager, on a weekly basis , the results
of treated solids and treated water testing for the previous 7 day period , and a final
summary report satisfactory to the District Manager within 30 days of the completion
of the project.
November 14, 1996 -TERJWS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC!GENER4L ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
PAGE 11 OF 13
COMMUNITY COMMUNICATION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
41. The Companies shall implement a community communication program incorporating
the following:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
a 24-hour voicemail hot line, with menu selections in English, Portuguese and
Italian, that is periodically updated, and receives messages or forwards
callers to a number to speak to someone directly;
an Internet home page site, including details about project schedule and the
process itself: _
periodic production of posters for posting in the community centres,
churches, and local businesses -with photographs showing the progress to
date;
production of three newsletters prior to, during and following completion of
treatment operations, describing project progress and response to
community concerns -in English, Portuguese and Italian -to be distributed
to the approximately 3000 closest residents and available at all community
outlets;
two evening Open Houses at the Davenport-Perth Community Centre to
explain the status of the project;
a Resource Centre at the Davenport-Perth Community Centre containing
information about the project. including the reports submitted to the Ministry
at the time they are submitted to the Ministry;
provisions of periodic public service announcements to CFMT Channel
35/47, CHIN radio, and Rogers Cable;
establishment of a Community Liaison Committee with representatives from
the community, as well as appropriate government agencies, and the present
landowner, including:
(i) the GE Task Force (1 );
(ii) the Bloor Junction Coalition (1 ); I
(i ii) the Davenport-Perth Community Centre (1 ); (invited)
(iv) each of the local Councillors' offices (Disero, Maxwell and Fotinos) (3);
(invited)
(v) the Ministry of Environment and Energy: I
(vi) the City of Toronto Department of Public Health: (invited)
(vii) the City of Toronto Fire Department; (invited)
(viii) Great Lakes United/Greenpeace; (observer) I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
November 14, 1996 -TER.MS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE N O. A290030
ECO LOGIC/GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA INC.
PAGE 12 OF 13
(ix) the present landowner -Canada Square; (invited)
(x) the GECI Project Manager; (ex officio)
(xi) the ECO LOGIC Project Manager; (ex officio).
The role of the Community Liaison Committee will be to provide advice to
GECI/ECO LOGIC on project implementation as it relates to community
concerns, and in particular to monitor this communications plan and make
recommendations to amend it as necessary. The Committee will also
monitor and provide input to the Companies and the Ministry on the
operation, including any matters on wh ich the Director's determination is
requ ired under this Certificate or Provisional Certificate of Approval (System)
A84153. The community representatives in categories (i), (iii) and (iv) above
shall reside within 300 metres of the Site .
GE Canada Inc. shall inform the Committee of its intention to seek approval
to destroy any PCB waste or material at the Site other than the PCB
waste/material generally described in conditions 22 and 23 hereof and shall
sek input from the Committee before making such application .
42. GE Canada Inc. will provide funding to a maximum of six-thousand five-hundred
dollars ($6,500.00) to the Committee in order that the Committee can obtain, as
necessary, the assistance of Mr. Robert Honsberger of MacViro Consultants Inc. or
his designate as required in connection with rts work. The Committee may approach
GE Canada Inc. for an increase in this funding if circumstances warrant.
REGULATION 352
43. Approval is conditional upon the Ministry making a regulation which exempts GE
Canada Inc. and ELI Eco Logic International Inc. from the following requirements of
Ontario Regulation 352 R.R.O. 1990:
( 1)
(2)
(3)
paragraph 22 of subsection 6(1)
paragraph 27 of subsection 6(1)
paragraph 1 of section 13.
701786-1
November 14, 1996 -TER.lyfS A.ND CONDITIONS
WASTE DISPOSAL SITE NO. A290030
ECO LOGIC/GENERAL ELECTRIC CANA.DA INC.
PAGE 13 OF 13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCHEDULE "A"
Page 1 of 1
This Schedule forms part of the Terms and Conditions for Provisional Certificate
of Approval for Waste Disposal (Site}
1. PCB Treatment using the ECO LOGIC Process at General Electric Canada Inc.
Davenport Facility, Volume A -Application for Technology Approval, Volume B -
Application for Site Approval, February 5, 1996, prepared by ECO LOGIC, ELI Eco
Logic International Inc., 143 Dennis Street, Rockwood, Ontario NOB 2K0.
2. Response to Fann 1 of the Environmental Protection Act, Application for Certificate
of Approval for PCB Treatment using the ECO LOGIC Process at General Electric
Canada Inc. Davenport Facility, February 16, 1996.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ECO LOGIC Analytical Quality Assurance Plan, dated November 7, 1996.
ECO LOGIC Total Quality Management Plan, dated November 14, 1996.
ECO LOGIC Operations Health and Safety Plan, dated October 28, 1996.
Pre-Test Plan for the GECI Davenport Project, dated October 28, 1996.
7. Ambient Air Monitoring Program GECI Davenport Site, dated November 11, 1996.
8. Sedgwick Reports dated April and October 1996.
9. H.H. Angus & Associates Limited Report dated October 15, 1996.
10. The Grinnell Fire Protection Services Reports of September 5, September 30 and
October 21, 1996.
11 . Letter from the City of Toronto Fire Department dated September 26, 1996.
12. Worse Case Hydrogen Release Scenarios Proposed by Eco Logic in a letter dated
September 18, 1996.
13. The Eco Logic Process System Start-up, Shut-<:lown and Power Outage Procedures
Document dated June 1996.
14. Responses of Eco Logic dated October 21, 1996 to the City of Toronto Fire
Department.
15. Description of Treatment System Layout and Material Flow (undated).
SCHEDULE "8"
Page 1 of 2
This Schedule forms part of the Terms and Conditions for Provisional Certificate of
Approval for Waste Disposal (Site)
DRAFT FORM OF IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT
TO BE TYPED ON BANK LETTERHEAD
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario
as Represented by the Minister of Environment & Energy
We hereby authorize you to draw on the ________ __.,Name of
Bank] [must be an Ontario Branch] for account of [Company's name]
___________ [Address.._ ___________ _
Ontario, an aggregate amount of
______________________ ($ ____ ___,
lawful money of Canada available by demand.
Pursuant to the request of our customer, __________ , we hereby establish and give
to you an Irrevocable Letter of Credit in your favour which may be drawn on by you at any time and
from time to time upon written demand for payment made upon us by you, which demand we shall
honour without enquiring whether you have a right as between yourself and our said customer to
make such demands, and without recognizing any claim of our said customer. This Irrevocable
Letter of Credit will continue up to _______ day of ___________ ,
19 __ , and will be automatically renewed for one year on the same tenns and conditions
(including this one for renewal) unless we give you at least 60 days' written notice that it will not be
so renewed and you may call for payment on the full amount outstanding under this Irrevocable
Letter of Credit at any time prior to that date should this Irrevocable Letter of Credit not be renewed.
Partial drawings are permitted.
Any payment made hereunder shall be in favour of the Minister of Finance of Ontario.
I
-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCHEDULE "B" (continued)
Page 2 of 2
This Schedule forms part of the Terms and Conditions for Provisional Certificate of
Approval for Waste Disposal (Site)
The amount secured by this Irrevocable Letter of Credit may be reduced from time to time by written
notice to the Bank from you.
Any notice under the previous paragraph or any demand hereunder may be made by you or by the
Assistant Deputy Minister, Operations Division; the Assistant Deputy Minister, Corporate
Management Division; Director, Approvals Branch or such other Director as you from time to time
authorize in writing.
Your claim under this Irrevocable Letter of Credit must be in writing addressed to the ____ _
_ [insert name and address of issuing Bank]. Ontario or its main branch in Toronto, Ontario
quoting our Irrevocable Letter of C_redit # _________ dated _________ _
19 __
We hereby agree with you that demands made in compliance with the terms of this credit shall be
duly honoured upon presentation at the Bank.
Authorized Signing Officers
SCHEDULE "C"
Page 1 of 2
This Schedule fonns part of the Tenns and Conditions for Provisional Certificate of
Approval for Waste Disposal (Site)
Column 1
NAME OF CONTAMINANT
Arsenic
Barium-total water soluble
Chromium (Di.Tri and Hexavalent forms)
Cobalt
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Strontium
Bromoform
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
1, 1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Ethylene Dichloride
Ethylene Dibromide
1-TEQ (in picograms per cubic metre of air)
Methylene Chloride
T etrachloroethylene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
T richlorofluoromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Naphthalene
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
• See example on next page for calculation of 1-TEQ
Column 2
HALF HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION
AT POINT OF IMPINGEMENT
(in micrograms per cubic metre of
air unless noted otherwise}
1
30
5
0.3
10
7.5
3
100
5
20
100
165
1800
1500
600
315
1200
9
15"
5300
10000
100
350000
18000
3
36
0.45
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCHEDULE "C"(continued)
METHOD OF CALCULATING 1-TEQ
Dioxin/Furan Isomers of Concern International
Toxicity
Equivalency
Factors
(I-TEFs)
2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 1.0
1,2,3.7,8 Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 0.5
1.2.3.4.7.8 Hexachlorodibenzo-p--dioxin 0.1
1.2.3.6. 7.8 Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 0.1
.
1.2. 3. 7 .8.9 Hexachlorodibenzo-p--dioxin 0.1
1.2.3.4.6. 7.8 Heotachlorodibenzo-o-dioxin 0.01
1.2.3.4.6. 7.8.9 Octachlorodibenzo-p--dioxin 0.001
2.3.7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzofuran 0.1
2.3.4. 7.8 Pentachlorodibenzofuran 0.5
1,2.3.7.8 Pentachlorodibenzofuran 0.05
1,2.3.4.7.8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 0.1
1.2.3.6. 7.8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 0.1
1.2.3.7.8.9 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 0.1
2.3.4.6.7.8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 0.1
1.2.3.4.6. 7,8 Heotachlorodibenzofuran 0.01
1.2.3,4.7,8.9 Heotachlorodibenzofuran 0.01
1.2,3.4.6.7,8,9 Octachlorodibenzofuran 0.001
TOTAL TOXICITY EQUIVALENT
• Sum of toxicity equivalents of individual isomers.
Page 2 of 2
Concentration Toxicity
in pg/m3 Equivalent
(Analytically (TEO) in
measured) pg TEO/mJ
0.01 0.01
0.011 0.0055
0.006 0.0006
0.01 0.001
0.019 0.0019
0.15 0.0015
--
0.11 0.011
0.033 0.0165
0.024 0.0012
0.03 0.003
0.016 0.0016
0.016 0.0016
0.007 0.0007
0.047 0.00047
0.008 0.00008
--
0.06088·
APPENDIX
TERA1S AND CONDITIONS
for
PROVISIONAL CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NO.A841531
(0
DESTROY or DECONTAMINATE PCB WASTE
using :
ECO LOGIC 's MOBILE PCB DESTRUCTOR
November 14, 1996
Applicant:
ELI Eco Logic International Inc . (ECO LOGIC)
143 Dennis Street
Rockwood, Ontario
NOB 2KG
I
I 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
November 14, 1996 -TER}dS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE i\1ANAGEMENI SYSTEM NO. A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 1 OF 14
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this Certificate of Approval:
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
"Act" means the Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E-19, as
amended;
"Application" means the Application for a Certificate of Approval for the
Destruction of PCB's Using Mobile Technology submitted by ELI Eco Logic
International Inc. (ECO LOGIC), dBted February 16, 1996 and signed by K.
Elizabeth K0mmling;
"CBs" means chlorinated benzenes;
"Certificate" means this Provisional Certificate of Approval For a Waste
Management System No. A841531 issued in accordance with Section 27 of
the Act;
"Commencement Date of Operation" means the eighth day after the first day
of feeding PCB waste to the Destructor;
"Company" means ELI Eco Logic International Inc. (ECO LOGIC);
"Destructor' means the ECO LOGIC Mobile Hazardous Waste Destructor
consisting of a reactor, a recirculating gas heater, a catalytic steam reformer,
a thermal reduction mill, a sequencing batch vaporizer, scrubber system, gas
compressors, gas storage, a boiler, a vaporizer and auxiliary equipment
including a stripper system, carbon filters, solids separating filters, a disk
centrifuge, a filter press, etc., all as described in the Application and
Supporting Documentation listed in Schedule "A" of this Certificate;
"Details Document" means Details Document, Mobile PCB Destruction
Facilities, Technology and Site Approvals, Demonstration Testing,
Operational Controls , April 1986, Min istry of the Environment;
"Director' means the Ministry Director of Approvals;
November 14, 1996 -TERMS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTElvf NO. A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 2 OF 14
(10) "District Manager" means the District Manager, Metropolitan Toronto District
Office of the Central Region of the Ministry;
(11) "DRE" means "Destruction and Removal Efficiency" and can be described as
a measure of the difference between the mass air emissions of an organic
compound from the Catalytic Steam Reformer/Boiler stack of the Destructor
and the mass of that compound introduced into the Destructor via the TRM
inlet;
(12) "Manager" means the Manager, Environmental Engineering Services
Section, Science and Technology Branch, of the Ministry, or any other
person who represents and carries out the duties of the Manager,
Environmental Engineering Services Section, Science and Technology
Branch of the Ministry, as those duties relate to the conditions of this
Certificate;
(13) "Ministry" means the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Energy;
(14) "PCB waste" means PCB equipment, PCB liquid or PCB material as defined
in Regulation 362 R.R.O. 1990 as amended;
(15) "PCDDs" means polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins;
(16) "PCDFs" means polychlorinated dibenzofurans;
(17) "Point of Impingement" means a point of impingement as calculated in
accordance with Regulation 346 or an alternate method acceptable to the
Director;
(18) "ppm" means parts per million by volume;
(19) "Pre-test Information" means the information outlined in Section 1.1 of the
Source Testing Code and as set out in Item 6 of Schedule "A";
(20) "Product Gas Storage Area" means the area which contains the product gas
storage tank;
(21) "Provisional Certificate" means the Provisional Certificate of Approval for
Waste Disposal Site (Site) for Destruction and Decontamination of PCB
Waste at the Site;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
November 14, 1996 -TERMS A.ND CONDITIONS
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NO. A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 3 OF 14
(22) "Publication NPC-205" means Publication NPC-205, Sound Level Limits for
Stationary Sources in Class 1 &2 Areas (Urban), October 1995;
(23) "Treated Materials" means residual solid material following treatment of the
PCB wastes by the Destructor;
(24) "Regulation 346" means Ontario Regulation 346, R.R.O. 1990 as amended ;
(25) "Regulation 352" means Ontario Regulation 352, R.R .O. 1990 as
amended;
(26) "SBV' means Sequencing Batch Vapourizer as described In Item 1 of
Schedule "A" of this Certificate;
(27) "Site" means Buildings 18 and 36 at 940 Lansdowne Avenue, in the City of
Toronto as depicted in Volume B -Site of Item 1 of Schedule UA" to this
certificate;
(28) "Source Testing" means sampling of emissions resulting from the operation
of the Destructor to treat soils within the normal operating ranges of the
Destructor, as depicted in Schedule UE" of this Certificate;
(29) "Source Testing Code" means the Source Testing Code, Version 2, Report
No . ARB-66-80, dated November 1980, prepared by the Ministry, as
amended;
(30) "Test Contaminants" means those contaminants set out in Schedule "B",
attached to this Certificate; and
(31) ''TRM" means Thermal Reduction Mill as described in Item 1 of Schedule "A"
to this Certificate.
November 14, 1996 -TERA1S AND CONDITIONS
WASTE i\1ANAGEMENT SYSTEM NO. A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 4 OF 14
GENERAL
Conditional Approval
1. This Certificate expires October 31, 1997.
2. The Director may extend the expiry date of this Certificate in case of late arrival of
the Destructor to the Site or mechanical malfunctions of the Destructor or delays
due to other circumstances which are beyond the reasonable control of the
Company.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Nothing in this approval dispenses with the Company's duty to comply with the Act,
the Ontario Water Resources Act, and the regulations and any order made
thereunder.
This Certificate is granted on condition that the Company shall apply for and obtain,
prior to commencement of operation of the Destructor, the following additional
certificates of approval:
(1) the Provisional Certificate; and
(2) a certificate of approval under Section 9 of the Environmental Protection Act
in respect of air and noise emissions related to Destructor operations at the
Site.
This Certificate must be read in conjunction with the Provisional Certificate.
(1)
(2)
The Site shall be established, used, operated and maintained in accordance
with the terms and conditions herein, the Application and supporting
documentation listed in Schedule "A" of this Certificate.
In interpreting the obligation under 6.(1 ), any conflict or ambiguity which
arises shall be resolved by referring to:
(a)
(b)
the terms and conditions where the conflict arises between a term and
condition and the Application as amended;
the terms and conditions where a conflict arises between a term and
condition and Schedule "A";
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7.
8.
(c)
November 14, 1996 -TER.J.vf S AND CONDITIONS
WASTE 1v!ANAGEivfENI SYSTEM NO . A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 5 OF 14
the document with the most recent date where a conflict or ambiguity
arises between or among documents in Schedule "A".
The Company shall, prior to the start of waste processing, submit to the Director
revised dispersion modelling which combines data taken from the demonstration
testing at the General Motors of Canada Limited (GMCL) St. Catharines and
Kwinana Australia facilities, for review and approval by the Director. The purpose
of this review and approval will be to determine, with the input of the Standards
Development Branch of the Ministry, after consultation with the Medical Officer of
Health, that the emissjon from the Destructor of contaminants for which there are
no Ministry Point of Impingement standards will not pose an undue risk to human
health or the environment.
The Company shall, prior to waste processing using the TRM at the Site, submit to
the Director for approval a report on the desorption effectiveness of the TRM at the
GMCL St. Catharines Site, to render the treated soil a non-PCB material under
Regulation 362.
Insurance
9. (1) The Company shall maintain in force, during the time necessary to complete
the project the following:
(a) Pollution Liability Insurance in the amount of S5,000,000 as described
in Attachment R of Item 2 of Schedule "A" to this Certificate; and
(b) General Liability Insurance in the amount of $5,000,000 as described
in Attachment R of Item 2 of Schedule "A" to this Certificate.
November 14, 1996 -TERivfS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE MANAGEMEiVI SYSTEM NO. A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 6 OF 14
GENERAL SITE OPERATIONS
10. The Company shall:
( 1)
(2)
(3)
NOISE
take appropriate measures to minimize emissions of air contaminants during
transportation, processing, storage and handling of PCB waste within the Site
boundaries;
take appropriate remedial action if, at any time, problems such as dust, storm
water, odours, noise or other nuisances are generated at the Site; and
make daily inspections of the equipment and maintain a log of any unusual
conditions and any maintenance or modifications recommended.
11. The Company shall ensure that noise emissions from the Site comply with the limits
set out in Publication NPC-205 where applicable.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
12. The Company shall ensure that the Site and the Destructor, equipment and
associated services which are installed or used to achieve compliance with this
Certificate are properly operated and maintained at all times. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the Company shall:
(1)
(2)
(3)
prepare, and update as necessary, a manual outlining an operating and
maintenance program for the Destructor including, as a minimum, the
operating and maintenance procedures recommended by the suppliers and
routine and emergency procedures to be followed during the use of the
equipment;
implement the recommendations of the operating and maintenance manual
for the Destructor;
ensure that equipment and materials are kept on hand for use at the Site and
in good repair for immediate use in the event of:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(4)
(5)
(a)
(b)
November 14, 1996 -TERMS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NO. A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 7 OF 14
any change in operating parameters which results or potentially could
result in an excursion from the operational ranges set out in Schedule
"E";
any fire, spill, or explosion;
and that staff are trained in the use of said equipment and materials and in
the methods and procedures to be employed upon the occurrence of such
an event; and
implement a quality assurance/ quality control program, as detailed in item
4 of Schedule "A"; and
test the reactor wails prior to the start of waste processing operations, for
internal wall loss (corrosion) using the procedure set out in ASTM A388. This
test shall be repeated during a scheduled maintenance period approximately
half way through the project. The technical consultant (Mr. Honsberger) to
the Community Liaison Committee shall be notified as soon as possible in
advance of the tests (a minimum of 3 working days) and provided with an
opportunity to witness them. In the event that corrosion is detected, the
minimum acceptable wall thickness shall be determined by the applicable
code requirements.
13. The feeding of waste to the reactor shall be automatically halted in the event that the
critical value of one or more of the operating parameters listed in Schedule "O" is not
satisfied, based on the average value of the parameter over the averaging time
specified in Schedule "O". Waste feed to the reactor shall not recommence until the
operating parameters are brought back into the opemting ranges specified in
Schedule "E".
14. The Company shall ensure that the use of product gas as fuel shall be automatically
halted in the event that the levels of monochlorobenzene in the product gas, or the
levels of carbon monoxide in the catalytic steam reformer exit, exceed the level set
out in Schedule "O", based on the average value of the parameter over the
averaging time specified in Schedule "O". The Company shall not recommence the
burning of product gas until the operating parameters are brought back into the
operating ranges specified in Schedule "E".
15. Following the verification testing as set out in condition 25, the Company may
propose, based on the verification testing results, for the approval of the Director,
November 14, 1996 -TERA1S AND CONDITIONS
WA.STE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NO. A.841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 8 OF 14
revisions to critical values and operational ranges set out in Schedules "D" and "E",
respectively.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
16. The Company shall provide to the District Manager on a daily basis, the results of
process control monitoring of parameters listed in Schedule "D", for the previous 24-
hour period.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
17. The Company shall implement all steps described the Emergency Response Plan
set out in Appendix 1 of the Operations Health and Safety Plan contained in Item
6 of Schedule "A".
WASTE APPROVED FOR TREATMENT
18. The Company may treat only the approved PCB waste as per the Provisional
Certificate.
DESTRUCTOR COMMISSIONING
19. The Company shall test the Destructor prior to its operation following the procedures
described in ECO LOGIC's "Commissioning Manual", (included in Item 4 of
Schedule A). The Destructor shall be tested at normal operating conditions with no
PCB waste introduced into the Destructor. The District Manager will be informed a
minimum of 3 working days in advance of commissioning.
WASTE PROCESSING LIMITS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
20. The Company shall ensure that the maximum feeding rate of PCBs, organic carbon I
and moisture to the reactor from any combination of waste feed systems shall not
exceed the rates set out in Schedule "F', as determined by the procedure set out in 1 Section 3.1 of Item 3 of Schedule "A", and Ministry-approved sampling protocols.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
November 14, 1996 -TERlvfS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NO. A.841531
ECO LOG!C
PAGE 9 OF 14
21. The maximum treatment rate for soils and/or sediments or slurries shall be
established by the highest moisture, or PCB or organic carbon loading rates to the
reactor demonstrated during verification testing, to meet the performance
requ irements set out in Condition 24 .
22. The Company shall not feed PCB oil to the reactor simultaneous with treatment of
soil in the TRM.
23. The Company shall not operate the Destructor in excess of the maximum feed ing
rate specified in conditions 20 and/or 21 as appropriate, or such other maximum
feed ing rates as may be specified by the Director following verification testing.
PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
24. The Company shall conduct all operations on the Site in such a manner as to ensure
that the maximum concentration of a contaminant, set out in Column 1 of the Table
in Schedule "C" of this Certificate, at a Point of Impingement shall not be greater
than the concentration set out in Column 2 of the Table in Schedule "C" of this
Certificate.
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Verification Source Testing
25. The Company shall perform Source Testing on the catalytic steam reformer/boiler
stack, in the first week following the Commencement Date of Operation of the
Destructor to determine the rate of emission of the Test Contaminants listed in
Schedule "B", or within such other time period as approved by the Director in case
of mechanical malfunctions of the Destructor or delays due to circumstances which
are beyond the reasonable control of the Company.
26 . The Source Testing described in condition 25 shall be carried out under the normal
operating ranges set out in Schedule "E" with a reactor temperature set point of
875°C.
27 . The source tests described in condition 25 shall be carried out simultaneously with
other sampling as required to determine DRE for PCBs. Source tests shall be
performed in the following manner:
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
November 14, 1996 -TER..t.HS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTE1H NO . A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE JO OF 14
The Company shall , seven days prior to commencement of the Source
Testing, notify the District Manager and the Manager, of the Source Testing;
The Source Testing Program shall follow the procedures described in the
Source Testing Code as set out in the Pre-Test Plan (Item 5 of Schedule
"A''). The Company shall obtain the Director's approval prior to making any
changes to the pre-test plan;
Each contaminant shall be sampled three times for the purposes of testing
required by condition 25;
The Company shall submit a report on the Source Tes ting and the .. DRE
testing to the District Manager, and the Director. The report shall be in the
format described in the Pre-Test Plan, and shall also include, but not be
necessarily limited to:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
an executive summary;
the results of the tests reported according to the form specified in the
Source Testing Code;
description of any deviations from the approved testing protocol during
the actual source test, and rationale therefore;
a process description, including process schematics indicating
approximate separation distances between the main equipment
groupings and showing stack heights;
production data including waste chemical composition, its feed rate
and the amount of methane produced;
records of operating conditions, including all records produced by the
continuous monitoring systems;
the measurements of the critical operational parameters outlined in
Schedule "D";
a record of performance of the Destructor including the values of
operating parameters and the time and duration of periods when the
waste feed to the Destructor has been halted during test runs;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
28.
29 .
30.
31 .
(i)
November 14, 1996 -TERMS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NO . A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE II OF 14
records of any upset conditions and actions taken to bring the
operations back to normal conditions; and
U) the results of dispersion calculations in accordance with (a) Regulation
346 and (b) Ministry Worse Case Model indicating the maximum
concentrations of the Test Contaminants at the Points of
Impingement.
If the Destructor is ope_rating such that the conditions of Schedule UD" are not met
during the stack testing, the test will be halted until the problem can be corrected
and waste treatment can be reestablished.
(1) After the completion of Source Testing field work, the Company shall not
treat waste until the analytical results of the Source Testing for PCBs are
available and have been submitted to the District Manager and the Director,
to verify compliance with the Point of Impingement standard for PCBs, and
the Director approves the resumption of the operation. The submission of
the PCB dispersion modelling to the District Manager and the Director shall
include a preliminary QNQC review;
(2) The Company shall submit as soon as reasonably possible analytical results
of the Source Testing for benzene for review and approval by the Director.
The Company shall make all reasonable efforts to deliver an interim report on the
balance of the stack output data, including a preliminary QNQC review, to the
Director within 7 weeks following completion of the Source Testing field work.
After the Commencement Date of Operation, PCB waste will be treated only for the
purpose of preparing for or carrying out the Source Testing, until the Director
approves resumption of operations pursuant to condition 29.
AMBIENT AIR MONITORING AND REPORTING
32. The Company shall conduct pre-, post-and destruction-phase off-site ambient air
monitoring as identified in the Ambient Air Monitoring Program, set out in Item 7 of
Schedule UA". Further, the Company shall:
(i) report the averages of the downwind concentration of each six day sampling
set; and
(ii)
November 14, 1996 -TERMS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTE1H NO. A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 12 OF 14
provide a final report in a form satisfactory to the Director within 60 days of
project completion, including a discussion and the results of the off-Site
Ambient Air Monitoring Program and interpret these results in conjunction
with Source Testing results reported in compliance with condition 27.(3) and
the results required by condition 27.(4).
PROTOCOL FOR INCREASING THROUGHPUT
33 . In the event that the . Company wishes to increase the throughput beyond that
verified in the source test, the Company shall perform verification Source Testing
during waste processing at the higher throughput, in accordance with requirements
of co-nditions 25 through 29, and conditions 35 through 38, with the exception that
only one set of stack gas samples required to measure the Test Contaminants will
be collected .
34. The Company shall resume waste treatment at the lower rate until the results of
PCB analysis in the stack sample during higher throughput have been received, and
have been shown to meet criteria at POI, and the Director approves the resumption
of the operation at the higher throughput.
SAMPLING OF LIQUID AND SOLID WASTE AND MATERIAL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
35 . During Source Testing, the Company shall collect the following samples using
Ministry-approved sampling protocols, for each of the three Source Testing runs: I
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
a representative sample of untreated soil prior to its introduction to the feed
hopper of the TRM;
a grab sample of treated soil after exiting the TRM every fifteen minutes, the
fifteen minute samples composited into a single sample representative of
treated soil;
a grab sample of scrubber effluent water after carbon treatment every fifteen
minutes, and fifteen minute samples composited into a single representative
sample of Destructor effluent;
a representative sample of Destructor product gas entering the storage tank.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
November 14, 1996 -TER.A1S AND CONDITTONS
WASTE iv!ANAGEMENI SYSTEM NO. A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 13 OF 14
36. During Source Testing, the Company shall collect one representative sample of
commercially-supplied hydrogen and natural gas for all three tests.
ANALYSIS FOR SOURCE TESTING
37. The samples described in condition 35 shall be analysed for the parameters listed
in Schedule "8".
38. The samples describ~d in condition 36 shall be preserved for later analysis, if
needed, for parameters listed in Schedule "8" as necessary.
November 14, 1996 -TERMS AND CONDITIONS
WASTE iWANAGEMENT SYSTEM NO. A841531
ECO LOGIC
PAGE 14 OF 14
CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING
39. The Company shall install continuous emission monitors and conduct and maintain
a program to continuously monitor the concentration of the following species in the
combustion gas exit (common catalytic steam reformer/boiler stack) of the
Destructor equipment where the product gas is burned:
( 1)
(2)
carbon monoxide at all times when the product gas is being used as fuel;
total hydrocarb.ons, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, oxides of nitrogen,
sulphur dioxide and oxygen simultaneously with Source Testing.
The continuous monitoring systems shall be equipped with continuous recording
devices and shall comply with the Continuous Emission Monitoring requirements
satisfactory to the Director.
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DURING NORMAL OPERATIONS
40. The Company shall follow the procedures described in the Quality Assurance Plan
(Item 3 of Schedule WA").
41 . Following the processing of the first three SBV loads, a report shall be prepared and
submitted to the Director which compares the levels of all parameters listed in
Schedule WO" plus carbon monoxide and methane in the product gas, to levels of the
same parameters and compounds found during Source Testing using the TRM.
Process monitoring data shall be included as required to demonstrate comparable
operating conditions.
REGULATION 352
42.
7017863
Approval is conditional upon the Ministry making a regulation which exempts GE
Canada Inc. and ELI Eco Logic International Inc. from the following requirements of
Ontario Regulation 352 R.R.O. 1990:
(1) paragraph 22 of subsection 6(1)
(2) paragraph 27 of subsection 6(1)
(3) paragraph 1 of section 13.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCHEDULE "A"
Page 1 of 1
This Schedule forms part of the Terms and Conditions for Provisional Certificate of
Approval for Waste Management System
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11 .
12.
13.
PCB Treatment using the ECO LOGIC Process at General Electric Canada Inc.
Davenport Facility, Volume A -Application for Technology Approval, Volume B -
Application for Site Approval, February 5, 1996, Prepared by ECO LOGIC, ELI Eco
Logic International Inc., 143 Dennis Street, Rockwood, Ontario NOB 2K0.
Response to Form I of the Environmental Protection Act, Application for a Certificate of
Approval for Destruction of PCBs Using Mobile Technology, PCB Treatment using the
ECO LOGIC Process at General Electric Canada Inc. Davenport Facility, February 16,
1996.
ECO LOGIC Analytical Quality Assurance Plan, dated November 7, 1996.
ECO LOGIC Total Quality Management Plan, dated November 14, 1996.
ECO LOGIC Pre-Test Plan for the GECI Davenport Project, dated October 28, 1996
ECO LOGIC Operations Health and Safety Plan, dated October 28, 1996.
Ambient Air Monitoring Program -GECI Davenport Site, dated November 11, 1996.
Sedgwick Reports dated April and October 1996.
H. H. Angus & Associates Limited Report dated October 15, 1996.
The Grinnell Fire Protection Services Reports of September 5, September 30 and
October 21, 1996.
Letter from the City of Toronto Fire Department dated September 26, 1996.
Worse Case Hydrogen Release Scenarios Proposed by Eco Logic in a letter dated
September 18, 1996.
The Eco Logic Process System Start-up, Shut-down and Power Outage Procedures
Document dated June 1996.
14. Responses of Eco Logic dated October 21, 1996 to the City of Toronto Fire Department.
15. Description of Treatment System Layout and Material Flow (undated).
SCHEDULE "B"
This Schedule fonns part of the Tenns and Conditions for Provisional
Approval for Waste Management System
TEST CONTAMINANTS
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
Benzene
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dichloromethane
1, 1-Dichloroethane
trans-1, 2-Dichloroethylene
Ethyl benzene
Ethylene Dichloride
Ethylene Dibromide
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
T richlorod iflouromethane
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
T richloroethene
m-Xylene
a-Xylene
p-Xylene
Vinyl Chloride
MISCELLANEOUS
Total Suspended Particulate Matter (Air)!Total Suspended Solids (Water)
Hydrogen Chloride
Chlorine
pH (water)
NOx
Total Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Page 1 of 3
Certificate of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCHEDULE "B"(continued)
TEST CONTAMINANTS (continued):
POL YAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Benzo( a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo( e )pyrene
Fluoranthene
1-Methylnapthalene
2-Methylnapthalene
Naphthalene
Pyrene
Tetralin
Triphenylene
CHLOROBENZENES
1, 3, 5-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorobenzene ·
2,3,6-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4, 5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1, 2, 3,4-tetrachlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
METALS
Cd Cadmium
Be Beryllium
Mo Molybdenum
Ca Calcium
V Vanadium
Al Aluminum
Mg Magnesium
Ba Barium
K Potassium
Na Sodium
Zn Zinc
Mn Manganese
Co Cobalt
Cu Copper
Ag Silver
Li Lithium
Tl Thalium
Fe
Pb
Cr
Ni
Si
Ti
B
p
Hg
As
Sb
Bi
Te
Sn
Sr
Iron
lead
Chromium
Nickel
Silicon
Titanium
Boron
Phosphorus
Mercury
Arsenic
Antimony
Bismuth
Se Selenium
Tellurium
Tin
Strontium
SCHEDULE "B"(continued)
Page 2 of 3
TEST CONTAMINANTS (continued):
POL YCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
Total Polychlorinated Bi phenyl Congeners
Dichlorobiphenyls
Trichlorobiphenyls
T etrachlorobiphenyls
Pentachlorobiphenyls
Hexachlorobiphenyls
Heptachlorobiphenyls
Octachlorobiphenyls
Nonachlorobiphenyls
Oecacholrobiphenyls
POL YCHLORINATED DIBENZO-P-OIOXINS
Total Tetrachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (TCDD)
Total Pentachlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD)
Total Hexachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (HxCDD)
Total Heptachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (HpCDD)
Octachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD)
2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8 TCDD)
1,2,3,7,8 Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (1,2,3,7,8 PCDD)
1,2,3,4,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD)
1,2,3,6,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCOO)
1,2,3,7,8,9 Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD)
POL YCHLORINATED DIBENZOFURANS
Total Tetrachlorinated dibenzofurans (TCDF)
Total Pentachlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF)
Total Hexachlorinated dibenzofurans (HxCDF)
Total Heptachlorinated dibenzofurans (HpCOF)
Octachlorinated dibenzofuran (OCOF)
2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,7,8 TCOF)
1,2,3,7,8 Pentachlorodibenzofuran (1,2,3,7,8 PCOF)
2,3,4,7,8 Pentachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,4,7,8 PCDF)
1,2,3,4,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran (1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCOF)
1,2,3,6,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran (1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCOF)
2,3,4,6,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCOF)
1,2,3,7,8,9 Hexachlorodibenzofuran (1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCOF)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 Heptachlorodibenzofuran (1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF)
1,2,3,4, 7,8,9 Heptachlorodibenzofuran (1,2,3,4, 7,8,9 HpCOF)
Page 3 of 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCHEDULE "C"
Page 1 of 2
This Schedule forms part of the Terms and Conditions for Provisional Certificate of
Approval for Waste Management System
Column 1
NAME OF CONTAMINANT
Arsenic
Barium-total water soluble
Chromium (Di.Tri and Hexavalent forms)
Cobalt
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Strontium
Bromoform
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
1, 1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Ethylene Dichloride
Ethylene Dibromide
I-TEQ (in picograms per cubic metre of air)
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
T richlorofluoromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Naphthalene
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
• See example on next page for calculation of I-TEQ
Column 2
HALF HOUR AVERAGE CONCENTRATION
AT POINT OF IMPINGEMENT
{in micrograms per cubic metre of
air unless noted otherwise)
1
30
5
0.3
10
7.5
3
100
5
20
100
165
1800
1500
600
315
1200
9
15•
5300
10000
100
350000
18000
3
36
0.45
In addition to the above list of contaminants, the point of impingement requirements for all
contaminants listed in Regulation 346 will be met during operations.
SCHEDULE "C"(continued)
METHOD OF CALCULATING 1-TEQ
Dioxin/Furan Isomers of Concern International
Toxicity
Equivalency
Factors (I-TEFs)
2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo-o-dioxin 1.0
1,2,3, 7,8 Pentachlorodibenzo-o-dioxin 0.5
1,2.3.4,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzo-o-dioxin 0.1
1.2.3.6,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzo-o-dioxin 0.1
1,2.3, 7,8.9 Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin 0.1
1,2.3.4.6. 7,8 Heptachlorodibenzo-o-dioxin 0.01
1,2.3.4.6. 7 ,8. 9 Octachlorodibenzo-o-dioxin 0.001
2.3.7.8 Tetrachlorodibenzofuran 0.1
2.3.4.7.8 Pentachlorodibenzofuran 0.5
1.2.3.7.8 Pentachlorodibenzofuran 0.05
1.2.3,4. 7.8 Hexachlorodibenzofu ran 0.1
1.2. 3,6. 7.8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 0.1
1.2.3.7.8.9 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 0.1
2.3 .4.6. 7.8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 0.1
1.2.3.4,6. 7.8 Heptachlorodibenzofuran 0.01
1.2.3.4. 7.8.9 Heotachlorodibenzofuran 0.01
1.2.3.4.6.7.8.9 Octachlorodibenzofuran 0.001
TOTAL TOXICITY EQUIVALENT
• Sum of toxicity equivalents of individual isomers.
Concentration
pg/mJ
(Analytically
measured)
0.01
0.011
0.006
0.01
0.019
0.15
-
0.11
0.033
0.024
0.03
0.016
0.016
0.007
0.047
0.008
-
Page 2 of 2
Toxicity
Equivalent
(TEQ)
pg TEQ/m3
0.01
0.0055
0.0006
0.001
0.0019
0.0015
-
0.011
0.0165
0.0012
0.003
0.0016
0.0016
0.0007
0.00047
0.00008
-
0.06088"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCHEDULE "D"
DESTRUCTOR OPERATING PARAMETERS
I Parameter I Value I Averaging Time I
Reactor Temperature > 850°C* 6 minutes
Reactor Pressure < 15 kPa 30 seconds
Reactor Gas Residence Time > 1 second 3 minutes
Catalytic Reformer Exit Gas Temperature > 400°C 30 seconds
(if operating)
Hydrogen Concentration (at scrubber > 55% (volume) 6 minutes
exit)
Oxygen Concentration (at scrubber exit) < 2% (volume) 3 minutes
Monochlorobenzene (at product gas < 100 ppmv 15 minutes
storage tank exit)
Carbon Monoxide (in catalytic steam < 50 ppm 3 minutes
reformer exit)
SWACL pH >7 15 minutes
• During processing of PCB oil by direct injection to the reactor, the reactor temperature shall be set at 900-C.
SCHEDULE "E"
OPERATIONAL RANGES FOR DESTRUCTOR OPERATING PARAMETERS
I Parameter I Range
Reactor Temperature 875 to 925°C
Reactor Pressure 0 to 5 kPa
Reactor Gas Residence Time > 1.5 seconds
Catalytic Reformer Exit Gas Temperature (if 500 to 800°C
operating)
Boiler Stack Temperature ambient to 600°C
SBV Stack Temperature ambient to 600°C
TRM Stack Temperature ambient to 600°C
Hydrogen Concentration (at scrubber exit) 60 to 100%
Oxygen Concentration (at scrubber exit) Oto 0.4%
Monochlorobenzene (at product gas storage tank 0 to 50 ppmv
exit)
Carbon Monoxide (in catalytic steam 0 to 10 ppm
reformer/boiler stack)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCHEDULE "F"
Feedrate vs. Waste Composition
ECO LOGIC Process
Page 1 of 5
I ' ' ...... I i I ' I I II I I I
m +-I _ ____.! _ __...!-+~;-+-' ~..._I t-':.J.•I .:---+---'~-:-,----:..I -+-+-1~:·+-j i:...,....---+-1 -~f-+' -+1---'-t..Yi
: 100 I I I : I I 1~ i 1---l ! I 1r· ---I I 1
Q) • i... ~-........... ~ t--j--"-~ I r-~=-4
0,)
LL
Q)
..0
~ > 0
-
I ! l I :.........__I I , ! ! I 1 'I
I I I I !
l ~!1: I ! ; I
I I I I I I I i i I
I I 11 I I I i 11 I
...... ,.,,.
I i I 11 i I I i I! 1 I ; I ! 1 -'-, -----i''----'---+-'--+-+-+--,i-i-,--+-------+-+-+++;-,.----+--,--+-+, -,--,--t-;-i
0.1 1 10 100
Waste Composition(%)
---PCB Corie;-rt -'ff'-Wd.er Corter< -• -Organic Carbon Center<
SCHEDULE "F"
Page 2 of 5
Explanation of Maximum Feedrate
1. PURPOSE
Schedule "F" sets out maximum feeding rates of PCB wastes to the ECO LOGIC SE25 reactor in
graphical form based on PCB content, water content, and organic carbon content of the waste. The
x-axis presents the content of the waste as a percent. The y-axis presents the maximum feed rate
of the waste to the reactor. The lines on the graph represent the maximum feed rate as a function
of waste content for PCBs, water, and organic carbon.
The graph is used to set the maximum feedrate for any waste to the system reactor based on PCB
content, water content, and total organic carbon content.
2. USING SCHEDULE "F"·
The graph presented on Page 1 of Schedule "F" consists of separate graphed functions for PCB
content, water content, and organic carbon content based on the functions presented above.
To use the graph, the PCB content, water content, and organic carbon content must be known.
For each parameter (i.e. PCB content, water content, and organic carbon content), the measured
content value in the waste to be treated is plotted on the x-axis and a vertical line is extended up
to the graphical line corresponding to the parameter being plotted. The maximum feedrate is then
read from the y-axis by extending a horizontal line from the point where the vertical line intersects
the graphed line. This generates three potential maximum feedrates (one based on water content,
one based on organic content, and one based on PCB content). The lowest feedrate of the three
is the actual maximum feedrate for the waste.
The ECO LOGIC treatment system can treat waste at a feedrate at or below the maximum feedrate
derived by the procedure above, contingent on all system operating parameters being maintained
above the critical values set out in Schedule "O".
Examples:
i) PCB transformer oil
Composition: PCBs:
chlorobenzenes:
Mineral oil:
Water:
Carbon Content
54%
30%
15%
1%
48% (calculated)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Using Schedule"F":
PCB Content:
Water Content:
Carbon Content:
SCHEDULE "F"
Page 3 of 5
54% PCBs gives a maximum waste feedrate of 3.7 kg/min
1 % water gives a maximum waste feedrate of 1830 kg/min
48% carbon gives a maximum waste feedrate of 13 kg/min
The maximum feedrate for tne oil is set by the PCB content and is 3.7 kg/min. The system can treat
this liquid at 3.7 kg/min, or at a lower rate such as to maintain the operating parameters set out in
Schedule "O".
ii) Mineral oil
Composition:
Using Schedule"P':
PCB Content:
Water Content:
Carbon Content:
PCBs:
chlorobenzenes:
Mineral oil:
Water:
Carbon Content
1%
0%
99%
0.1%
86% (calculated)
1 % PCBs gives a maximum waste feedrate of 198 kg/min
0.1 % water gives a maximum waste feedrate of 18,300 kg/min
86% carbon gives a maximum waste feedrate of 7.3 kg/min
The maximum feedrate for the mineral oil is set by the organic carbon content and is 7.3 kg/min.
The system can treat this liquid at 7.3 kg/min, or at a lower rate such as to maintain the operating
parameters set out in Schedule "O".
iii) Soil
Composition: PCBs: 0.1% (1,000 mg/kg)
0%
Using Schedule"F":
PCB Content:
Water Content:
Carbon Content:
chlorobenzenes:
Mineral oil: 0%
Water: 10%
Carbon Content 2%
0.1 %, PCBs gives a maximum waste feed rate of 1,980 kg/min
10% water gives a maximum waste feed rate of 183 kg/min
2% carbon gives a maximum waste feedrate of 315 kg/min
SCHEDULE "F"
Page 4 of 5
The maximum feedrate for the soil is set by the water content and is 183 kg/min (about 260
tonnes/day). The system can treat this waste at 183 kg/min, or at a lower rate such as to maintain
the operating parameters set out in Schedule "D".
3. DERIVATION
3.1 PCB Content
The maximum PCB feedrate to the reactor has been derived based on successful system
performance testing to date on high strength PCB liquids. The highest rate of PCB feedrate to the
reactor was accomplished on the Australian system in November, 1995. The pertinent test
information is as follows:
PCB content of Liquid:
Sustained Liquid Feedrate:
DRE Achieved:
90% by weight
2.2 kg/min
99.999998% (greater than 7 nines)
The effective feedrate of PCBs to the reactor is calculated as
PCB Feed rate = PCB content of liquid x Sustained Liquid Feedrate / 100
PCB Feedrate = 1.98 kg/min
For PCB wastes of lesser PCB content, the maximum waste feedrate can be calculated to ensure
that PCB feedrate to the reactor does not exceed 1.98 kg/min using the following formula:
1.98 kg/min
Waste feedrate (kg/min) = ---------x 100%
Waste PCB Content(%)
The line representing this function for PCB content is plotted on the graph on Page 1 of Schedule
3.2 Water Content
The feedrate of water to the system reactor is limited by reactor heating capabilities. Based on
reactor heating, the maximum water feedrate to the reactor is 18.3 kg/min. Reactor temperature
cannot be maintained above the critical value (850°C) at water feedrates higher than 18.3 kg/min.
For PCB wastes of lesser water content, the maximum waste feedrate can be calculated to ensure
that water feed rate to the reactor does not exceed 18. 3 kg/min using the following formula
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SCHEDULE "F"
18.3 kg/min
Waste Feed rate (kg/min) = ---------x 100%
Waste Water Content(%)
Page 5 of 5
The line representing this function for water content is plotted on the graph on Page 1 of Schedule
"F".
3.3 Organic Carbon Content
The feedrate of organic carbon to the reactor is limited by reactor residence time: as more carbon
load is fed to the reactor, the residence time of gas in the reactor decreases. Based on reactor
residence time, the maximum organic carbon feedrate to the reactor is 6.3 kg/min. Reactor gas
residence time cannot be maintained above the critical value (1 second) at organic carbon
feedrates higher than 6.3 kg/min.
For PCB wastes of lesser carbon content, the maximum waste feed rate can be calculated to ensure
that organic carbon feedrate to the reactor does not exceed 6.3 kg/min using the following formula :
6.3 kg/min
Waste Feed rate (kg/min) = ----------x 100%
Waste Carbon Content(%) -
The line representing this function for organic carbon content is plotted on the graph on Page 1 of
Schedule "F".
EXHIBIT LIST GENERAL ELECTRIC/ECO LOGIC
EX.# Description
1 Referral letter from Director of Appro vals, MOEE,
dated February 21, 1996
2 Directions for Notice and Notice of Public Hearing
dated March 8, 1996
3 Order Appointing Hearing Panel dated March 26, 1996
4 Eco Logic 's Application for Technology Approval (Volume A)
and Application for Site Approval (Volume B) -
February 5, 1996
5 Eco Logic 's Response to Form 1 of the EPA , Application for
a Certificate of Approval for Destruction of PCBs Using
Mobile Technology -February 16, 1996
6 Proposed Terms and Conditions for Waste Management
System -Oct. 28, 1996
7 Proposed Terms and Conditions for Waste Disposal Site -
Oct. 28, 1996
8 Pre-Test Plan for the GECI Davenport Project -Oct. 28, 1996
9 Analytical Quality Assurance Plan, General Electric Canada
Inc . -Oct. 28 , 1996
10 Eco Logic -Total Quality Management Program Manual -
Oct. 28 , 1996
11 Operations Health and Safety Plan -The Eco Logic Process -
Oct. 28, 1996
12 Ambient Air Monitoring Program -GECI Davenport Site -
Oct. 28, 1996
13 Draft Regulation -GECI and Eco Logic Exemption from 3
Requirements of Regulation 352
14 Report: The Commission on the Regulatory Control of
Mobile PCB Destruction Facilities -June 28, 1985
15 Proposed Terms and Conditions for Waste Disposal Site -
Oct. 29 , 1996
16 Proposed Terms and Conditions for Waste Management
System-Oct. 29, 1996
APPEi'\1HX 3
EP-96-01
FILED BY DATE
Board Oct. 28/96
Board Oct. 28/96
Board Oct. 28/96
Oct. 28/96
Board
Board Oct. 28/96
Proponent Oct. 28/96
Proponent Oct. 28/96
Proponent Oct. 28/96
Proponent Oct. 28/96
Proponent Oct. 28 /96
Proponent Oct. 28 /96
Proponent Oct. 28/96
Proponent Oct. 29/96
MOEE Oct. 29196
Proponent Oct. 29 /96
Proponent Oct. 29196
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXHIBIT LIST GEi','ERAL ELECTRIC/ECO LOGIC
EX.# Description
17 2-page PCB Inventory Document produced by the iYf OEE
18 Statement of Great Lakes United and Greenpeace Canada to
the EAB on Application of Eco Logic and GECI
19 Two Draft Conditions of Approval Proposed by D. Crocker
20 Letter from D. Hallett, Eco Logic, to J. Castrilli and
D. Crocker re: position with respect to use of Eco Logic
Process to treat waste materials other than those originating
at former GE -Davenport complex -Oct. 28, 1996
21 Letter from Dr. H. Lee , GECI, to J. Castrilli and D. Crocker
re : position with respect to future application to treat
additional PCB materials -Oct. 29, 1996
11 Divisional Court Decision re: Eastview Road Landfill/City of
Guelph Appeal of EAB Decision
0 : \HE..\RI:'i G\EP\EP%0 I \USTS\EXH 1B IT. LST
A.PPEr'-U) IX 3
EP-96-01
FILED BY DATE
MOEE Oct. 29 /96
Coalition Oct. 29196
BJNC Oct. 29196
Proponent Oct. 29196
Proponent Oct. 29/96
Proponent Oct. 29/96
Oct1Jbcr JO. 1996
APPENDIX 4
Supporting Documentation for Technology Application
Process Descn.pcion
General Overview
Since 1986, ECO LOGIC has conducted research wich che aim of developing a new technology for
descroying aqueous organic wasces , such as concam in aced harbour sediments, Llndfill soil and leachaces .
and lagoon sludges. The goal was a commercially-via ble chemical process. not involving incineration or
other chem10-chemical oxidation processes. chat cou!d deal with these watery wastes and also process scored
wastes (e.g. contaminated soils. solvents. oils, industrial wastes. pescicides and chemical warfare agents).
Other companies and agencies at that time were focusing their efforcs primarily on incineration. and were
investigating a variety of pre-destruction cleaning or dewacering processes co deal with the problem of
aqueous wastes. The ECO LOGIC Process was developed with a view to avoiding the expense and
technical drawbacks of incinerators, while providing high destruction efficiencies and waste volume
capabilities.
Following bench-scale testing supported by the National Rese:irch Council. J lab-scale pilot unit was
constructed in I 988 and tested extensively . Based on the results of these cescs. a mobile large pilot-scale
unit (the SES ELI Destructor) was constructed wich funding suppon from che Canadian Department of
National Defence . The mobile SE5 unit (including an atomizing nozzle system), was completed and
commissioned in 199l. Ic was taken through a preliminary round of tests ac Hamilton Harbour. Ontario.
Canada. where the waste processed was coal-car-contaminated h:irbour sediment. Th:it demonstration
received funding from both Environment Canada's Contaminated Sediment Treatment Technology
Evaluation Program. and the Ontario Miniscry of Environment's (MOE's) Environmencal Technology
Program. In 1992. the same unit (plus a prototype them1al reduction unit). was taken through a second
round of tescs as pare of the United Scates Environmental Protect ion Agency (USEPA) Superfund
Innovati ve Technolog y Evaluation (SITE) program in Bay City, Michigan. This demonstration was
partially funded by the Environment C.rnada Development and Demonstration of Site Remediation
Technologies (DESRT) program. che Ontario MOE Environmental Technologies Program and the
Canadian Department of Nacional Defence Industrial Research Program . In chis test program, the SES unit
processed PCBs in aqueous, organic and soil matrices. Following these tests. modifications were made
co che SES unit and ancillary technologies and its size increased co produce the SE25 unic. (The volume
of the reactor for the SES unit is 5 cubic metres. compared with 25 cubic metres for the SE25 unit).
Described in the following sections are the ECO LOGIC Process and the results of demonstration testing
in Canada, the United States, and Australia at laboratory-, pilot-and commercial-scale.
Process Chemistry
The ECO LOGIC Process involves the . gas-phase ,reduction of organic compounds by hydrogen at
cemperarures of 850° C or higher. Chlorinated hydrocarbons. such as polychlorinaced biphenyls (PCBs)
and polychlorinaced dibenzo-p-dioxins (dioxins), are chemically reduced co methane and hydrogen chloride
(HCl). while non-chlorinated organic contaminants. such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), are
reduced substantially to methane and minor amounts of ocher light hydrocarbons. The HCI produced can
be recovered as acid or neutralized in a caustic scrubber downstream of the process reactor.
Figure l shows some examples of the reduct ion react ions for che destruction of a variety of contaminants
usi ng the ECO LOGIC Process. Unlike ox idation reaccions. the efficiency of these reduction reactions is
enhanced by the presence of wacer. wh ich aces as a hear transfer and reducing agent, as well as a source
of hydrogen. The water shift reactions shown produce hydrogen. carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide
from methane :ind wacer. These reactio ns are used at higher efficiencies co generate hydrogen by
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
subjeccing scrubbed mechane-rich produce gas co high cemperacures in che presence of a cacalysc.
Figure 1 ECO LOGIC PROCESS REACTIONS
Cl Cl
/ + 5 H --► 2 2
+ 8 H --► 2 (\ 2
/~J-\ + 23 H2 --► 14 CH 4
\= '·=
--► 6 CH
H + (n-1) H n (2n•2) 2 n CH
4
+ 4 HCI
+ 4 HCI + 2 H 0 2
WATER SHIFT REACTIONS
CH + H O --► CO + 3 H 4 2 2
?C3 molecule & hydrogen
re act to produce l:lenzene
& hydrogen chloride
Dioxin molecule & hydrogen
react to produce l:lenzene.
hydrogen cntorid!! & water
PAH molecule & hydrog!!n
react to produce m!!tnane
Benzene .!. :"lydrog!!n react
to produce m etnane
Hydrocaroons .!. hydrogen
react to produce metnane
Methane cl. water react to
produce caroon monoxide
and hydrogen
Car:ion monoxida & water
react to produce caroon
dioxide and nydrogen
An additional benefit of using an actively reducing hydrogen atmosphere for the destruction of chlorinated
organic compounds. such as PCBs. is chat no formation of dioxins or furans occu-rs . Ariy dioxins or -furan.s
in the waste are also destroyed. The reducing hydrogen atmosphere is maintained at more th:in 50 percent
hydrogen (dry b:isis) to prevent formation of PAHs. This makes the scrubbed recircu!Jtion gas suitable
for continuous monitoring using an on-line chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS). By me:isuring
the concentrations of intermediate reduction products, the CIMS produces a continuous indication of
destruction efficiency.
Waste Processing
Figure 2 is a schematic of the SE25 reactor where the destruction of the toxic organic waste. through its
breakdown into re-usable or disposable products. takes place. The various input screams are injected
chrough several ports mounted tangentially near the cop of che reactor. Special nozzles are used to atomize
liquid wastes. in order to accelerate liquid vapouriz.ation. The gas mi:uure swirls around a central stainless
steel rube. and is heated by 18 vertical radiant rube heaters with internal electric heating elements. By the
time it reaches the bottom of the reactor. the gas mixrure h:is reached a temperarure of at le:ist 850°C. The
rrocess reactions take place from the bottom of the central tube onwards. and rake less than one second
to complete .
I
I
Figure 2 COM;\,IERCI.-\L-SC.-\LE PROCESS REACTOR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TO CRIT SOX I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 3 is a process schematic of the emire system, including the SE25 reactor and anc ill ary technologies.
Most of the system componems are moumed on highway trailers for ease of mobility. The reactor trailer
houses the reactor, che electric heating concrol system, che scruJoer syscem, che recirculation gas blower,
che recircu lation gas heater and the watery wasce preheater vessel. . .\ second trailer contains the main
power distribution room. che boiler and the cacal ycic steam re fo rmer. Gas co oling capacity for the
scrubbing syscem is recirculated through evaporacive coolers. and scrubber stripping operacion.s are carried
our in 3. concainer siruated near the boiler. The produce gas compression and storage syscem is also skid-
mounced co allow flexibilicy in site layouc. For processing soils and ocher solids. che TRM is housed on
a separace trailer. and the SBVs are skid-mounted unics . The process concrol system. gas analyzer systems,
and command cencre are housed in a scandard office crailer.
Produce gas leJ.Ying the reaccor is scrubbed to remove HCI, water, heat, fine parciculates, aromatic
compounds and carbon dioxide. The first scage of the scrubber (Scrubber Acid Leg -SAL) c:rn be ope raced
co recover hydrochloric acid, which avoids acid neucralization wich cJ.ustic. If che wasce scream is heavily
chlorinated, che acid can usually be recycled. and generation of large volumes of salty wasce wacer is
avoided.
The second stage of scrubbing drops the temperarure of the gas to remove wacer and completes the removal
of HCl by caustic packed tower scrubbing (Scrubber Weak Acid (3.uscic Leg -SW ACL). Particulate
matter (which may have entered the reaccor as dissolved or suspended solids in the original waste) is
removed in both the first and second stages of the scrubber by concinuous filter ing. Heat is removed using
plate heat ex.changers and is transferred to the cooling water system.
The third stage of scrubbing removes low levels of benzene J.nd naphthalene from the gas scream by neutral
oil washing (Scrubber Wash Oil Leg -SWOL). The rich oil pumped to a stripper where benzene and
naphthalene are removed and sent co the inlec of the cacalycic steam reformer for conversion co hydrogen
and cJ.rbon dioxide . The fourth scrubbing s,age removes carbon dioxide using monoechanolamine (MEA)
absorpcion (Scrubber Monoeth:inolamine Leg -SMEAL). The rich MEA is pumped to a stripper where
the cJ.rbon dio:~ide is removed and is senc co che common boikr/CJ.c alycic sceam reformer stack.
The scrubber water from the scage-cwo scrubber leg returns co the covered section of the scrubber tank
through a drop-tube that extends well below the wacer surface. This acts as a seal against air infiltration
and as an emergency pressure relief mechanism. There will be no gas release if a short-term pressure
surge forces gas ouc of the bottom of this rube since a check valve allows the gas co re-enter the system
once che pressure rerurns to normal. The entire treatment loop operaces within 0.4 psi of atmospheric
pressure.
As waste is processed through the system. acid and water are generated as outputs. Filtered acid is pumped
co a storage tank for further accivaced carbon treatment prior to recycling . Scrubber decant water is also
filtered and carbon-treated co remove any trace of organic concaminac ion . and is then scored for analysis
prior co discharge. Spene activated carbon can be regenerated on-sire in the SBV. and the minor amount
of scrubber parciculate produced can also be processed through the TRM or SBV .
The cooled and scrubbed reaction gas is a clean dry mixrure of hydrogen, methane . carbon monoxide. and
other light hydrocarbons. Some of the reaction gas is reheated and recirculated back into the reactor.
Reaction gas is also recirculated through che TRM as sweep gas. through the SBV as sweep gas. and
through the catalytic steam reformer for hydrogen generation. E:ccess reJ.ction gas is removed from the
system. compressed, and scored . This scored ~produce gas" is chemically tested and subsequently used as
fuel co heat ancillary system components .
Figure 3
---.
--,·
COMMERCIAL-SCALE PROCESS SCHEi\fATIC
.
_,_
, , , -/ .-,--;j __ ---
~; ---
' I 3
' '!
C
!(;: ... : \_ __ _ ....; ): \,___
\h •.• .·: / . • '---.....__;.._,, I'
,------
.--,;
/ T,-,-1-1 ----
p ---------~ T
>==
n--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Throughout waste processing operacions. che produce gas is sampled for analysis by che CIMS and ocher
gas analyzers. The CIMS is capable of accuracely monitoring up to 10 organic compounds every few
seconds ac concencracions ranging from percenc levels down co ppb le vels. le is used as pare of che ECO
LOGIC Process as a diagnostic cool co monitor che concencracions of certain compounds indicative of the
process destruction efficiency. The compounds selected for monitoring depend on the waste being
processed. For example, during PCB processing, monochlorobenzene is cypically monitored as an
indicator of destruction efficiency. Low levels of chis volatile compound indicate chat destruction of che
PCBs is proceeding co complecion. The CIMS readings are monicored by che process concrol system. and
che exceedance of alarm limits sends a message co che operator.
Storage of the produce gas under pressure permics che continuous analysis of the gas prior co being used
as fuel and allows the operation of the system in a "scackless·· mode. A micro gas chromatograph is used
co concinuously monitor gas qualiry. This provides a continuous record of produce gas quality. The micro
GC readings are monitored by the process control syscem. and che use of fuel is curtailed automacically
should che produce gas not meet che quality criteria escablished. There will have been no emissions co the
environmenc. and the gas can simply be reprocessed. Potential applications for the scored produce gas
include burner fuel for the boiler.-rhe SBYs. rhe TRM. and rhe cacalycic steam refonner.
Design Plans
Confidential design plans h:ive been provided co Mr. Vlado Ozv:icic under sep:irace cover.
Operacions 1Hanuai
The oper:icions manual contains confidential informacion such :is operacion dec:iils and process and
instrumentation diagr:ims. This inform:icion has been provided co Mr. \/!ado Ozvacic under separate cover.
Corrcingency Plan
A preliminary Healch and Safery P!Jn. which contains inrormanon on emergency response and
concingencies, was provided in a December 18, I 995 preliminary submission co rhe MOEE. This plan is
currer:cly being developed. in consultation with rhe :ippropriace emergency response officials for the
Davenport sice. A copy of che preliminary plan from December is included wich chis accachmenc. A fin:il
version will be provided prior to rhe scare of on-sice waste processing.
Data Quality Assurance Program
A quality assurance plan has been developed for current commercial-scale demonstration operations at the
General Motors of Canada Limited (GMCL) site in Sc. Catharines, Ontario. This pl:in will be modified
for operations at the Davenport site. A copy of the GMCL quality assurance plan is included with chis
attachment, for reference.
APPENDIX 5 I
STATEMENT OF GREAT LAKES UNITED AND GREENPEACE CANADA
TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BOARD
ON APPLICATION OF ECO LOGIC AND GENERAL ELECTRIC CANADA
October 29, 1996
Great Lakes United and Greenpeace Canada raise no objections to a board approval
for the use of the Eco Logic Destructor to treat the designated PCB-contaminated
wastes currently in storage in Buildings 18 and 36 at the General Electric site at 940
Lansdowne Avenue in Toronto, Ontario.
Our conclusion is based on three prime considerations:
1) The evidence presented shows that the Eco-Logic process appears to be an
effective method of treating PCB wastes at this site.
2) We understand that the community around the site prefer to have the wastes
treated rather than continuing to live with the risks of having those wastes in
storage and so that further site assessment and clean up can be carried out.
3) The proposed certificate of approval has provisions in it that attempt to
ensure the operation of the facility in a manner that protects the community and
the environment.
In order to arrive at this conclusion, we went through an extensive evaluation process.
We hired four technical experts in clean-up technology, process engineering, toxicology
and monitoring to review the documentation and help us at all stages in this decision-
making process.
We participated in numerous meetings with Eco Logic, General Electric Canada, the
Ministry of Environment and Energy, the City of Toronto and the neighbourhood groups
where we with our technical experts recommended numerous changes to the draft
certificates of approval. We are pleased to be able to say that the proponents were
very cooperative and after thorough discussions accepted most of the changes we ·
recommended.
We have been able to obtain some major improvements in the certificates of approval.
These have included:
* Stricter operating conditions for the Destructor and requirements to
automatically and therefore immediately stop the feed of wastes and the burning
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
of product gas if the operating parameters are not met.
* Testing for more contaminants.
* Improved testing program before approval is given to begin full normal
operation of the Destructor and the requirement that the Destructor not operate
after the test runs until and unless the Director, with input from the community
liaison committee , formally agrees to the operation.
* More thorough testing of the thermal reduction mill and the sequencing batch
vaporizer.
* A strengthened public role in the implementation of this stage of the clean-up
through a strong community liaison committee and through ensuring easy public
access to information about the operation.
It is important to understand the context for our participation in this hearing. GLU and
Greenpeace are committed to virtual elimination of persistent toxic substances as
defined by the international Joint Commission and the Great Lakes Water Quality
Agreement. The International Joint Commission has interpreted this goal to mean that,
for existing production processes, the goal of zero discharge must be pursued so that
persistent toxic substances cannot be used, generated or released, while contaminants
already in the environment must be remediated. The implementation of the zero
discharge goal with appropriate remediation will achieve the agreement objective of
virtual elimination. The scientific consensus is that this strategy is essential for the long-
term health of all life.
Eco Logic does not achieve zero discharge of persistent toxic substances. We
acknowledge that to achieve the goal zero discharge of persistent toxic substances
requires that persistent toxic substances not have been generated or manufactured in
the first place. However, it appears that every other option to achieve virtual elimination
including doing nothing, or continued storage until such times as better destruction
technology has been developed will lead to more discharges. Therefore, we consider
this technology the better of possible options . It is noted, however, that the zero
discharge approach is most appropriate in avoiding the ongoing production of toxic
waste. Once persistent toxic substances exist, every option for disposal will be
problematic; therefore, the task is to chdse the one that minimizes and reduces risks
that already exist. "
The use of the technology results in the release of minute quantities of toxic
substances. Unfortunately, as the IJC has recognized clean up of the messes that we
have created will not be perfect. That is why the IJC has stressed the need to change
our production processes to stop using and producing persistent toxic substances.
We are more accepting of the Eco Logic Destructor than of other clean up technologies
that we are aware of because the evidence before us appears to ind icate that the
Destructor does not create dioxins and furans. We urge Eco Logic to try to refine their
process even further in order to make the technology even more effective . We also
urge the members of Eco Logic and other innovators to continue their work to develop
even more effective technologies for clean-up.
We are not convinced that continued long-term storage of PCB-contaminated wastes in
this building is desirable because storage inevitably has certain risks including air
emissions or the risks associated with accidental fire. We also are concerned that the
storage of PCB-contaminated materials in this building is delaying the further clean-up
of this site. We urge General Electric Canada to proceed quickly with the development
and implementation of the rest of the clean-up plan for this site with continued extensive
public participation.
We have had discussions with other members of the environmental community in North
America about this approval in general terms. It is important to recognize that some
members of the environmental community remain opposed in principle to the Eco Logic
technology because dioxins and furans have been released, even though the releases
are very small.
We raise no objection to Board approval of the use of the Eco Logic Destructor in this
case because the following requirements are enshrined in the certificates of approval:
• That only certain wastes may be treated and that no new wastes may be
brought onto the site for treatment, thus ensuring that this community will not
become a waste disposal site for other neighbourhoods.
• That the operation will continue for only a limited period of time, thus ensuring
that there will not be accumulation build up of contamination from the operation
of the technology.
• That there is ongoing public involvement in monitoring the operation of the
Destructor, thus strengthening the likelihood that the Destructor will be operated
with full precautions at all times.
The proposal to destroy PCBs at this site does not conform with the setback
requirements of Regulation 352. We support the passage of a special exemption from
the Regulation by an order-in-council for the temporary use of this technology at this
site. This does not mean, however, that we support a change to the regulation that
would drop the setback requirements for all technologies and in all situations, or for the
Eco Logic technology in all situations and applications
Great Lakes United and Greenpeace Canada recognize the role of non-incineration
technologies, such as the Eco Log ic Destructor for the clean up of PCB wastes, to help
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I
. ~.olv, ., exi~ting situations that pose risks to the environment. Our objective in taking this
fJOsi~ion is to encourage the virtual elimination of stockpiles of hazardous mater1als that
have be,:m created in our society.
But it is essential that we recognize the limitation of these technologies. No matter how
effective, inevitably they are incomplete efforts to destroy hazardous materials that are
produced. They must not be used as a justification for failing to switch to cleaner
production processes.
Our main objective is to ensure that the use and production, whether intentionally or
unintentionally, of persistent toxic substances and substances that cause lethal or
sublethal harm to human and non-human health is phased-out. We want to ensure that
our society does not create more stockpiles of hazardous wastes and create more
clean-up crises.
APPENDIX 6
Rules of Procedure
for the EAB
PROTOCOL FOR CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENTS AL\10NG PARTIES
As we emphasize the need for agreements among panies, and deal with these in hearings, the
panicipancs in our process look for guidance about how the Board will deal with agreements.
The following discusses a course of action, once a preliminary hearing has been commenced or
completed, for board panels in the specific circumstances described. This applies to agreements
reached during the course of a hearing as well as to agreements reached prior to the hearing of
oral evidence.
1.
2.
When the Board is satisfied that an agreement represents the combined interests of:
-the proponent
-those affected (eg. citizens group, individuals)
-the regulatory authorities
-other affected governments (eg. municipalities)
and that rl:te project is consistent with the purpose and provisions of the relevant legislation
and is in the public interest, it will accept and formally adopt the agreement.
The Board will determine whether it is satisfied through the documentation provided by
the parties (which should be logical and traceable and include the rationale for each aspect
of the agreement) and any oral evidence, if required. The Board will identify for the
panies v1hat oral evidence, if any, or funher documentation it will require.
If the documentation is sufficient and the panies are prepared to waive their right to
a hearing, the Board may decide that a full, formal hearing is not necessary and
accept tlte agreement and approve the project. Section 4 of the Statutory Powers
Procedure Act (RSO 1990) allows for this.
There would in all cases be a preliminary hearing. A public meeting (usually in the form
of a public evening session) should be held by the Board before it decides not to hold a
. full and formal hearing and before it decides to approve the project.
If a hearing is held and a party to an agreement is not in auendance when the
settlement is discussed, the Board must be satisfied that the party is, in fact, in
agreement.
If the Board or anyone who has not been party to the agreement raises an issue that
has not been considered., that issue may be considered. by the Board unless the panies
negotiate a resolution.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4 .
5.
- 2 -
The MOEE (or other relevant regulatory agency) should pamc1patc in rJ1e
negotiations toward an agreement which shows how compliance with regulatory
requirements has been achieved. If, however, the regulatory agency has ,lot bce:n
involved, but other parties have entered into a consent agreement, the p:·oponent
must present evidence on how its proposal meets regulatory requirements. Tite panel
has the responsibility to satisfy itself about adherence to provincial policy and
regulations and to consider Ministry policy. For example, in a landfill case the
Board should consider:
-the Provincial Water Quality Objectives for surface water protection;
-the MOEE's Reasonable Use Criteria for groundwater protection;
-the MOEE ;:-<:::y for protecting residential propenies from excess noise;
-the MOEE Point of Impingement Standards for air quality protection;
-the provincial policy for wetland protection;
-new land use policy statements.
If the regulatory requirements are met, the panel must still determine that the public
interest is protected.
If there is no agreement, then the Board will play its adjudicative role.
In summary, if an agreement can be negotiated within the regulatory framework, the Board muse
still be satisfied that need has been established and the project is in the public interest. If
satisfied, the Board will accept the agreement and approve or amend and approve th1.! project
either at/after a hearing or, if the parties agree to waive their right to a foITi1al hearing, without
a hearing, but in a written decision.
a: lcabopcr\ct,O'Juppa,di.x.b As of April 25, 1995
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIXB
I PROCESS DATA LOGSHEETS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - - - --· - - - - - - - - - - - ----< OJ -, -, (1) ::, n 0 C ::, ~ --< r-OJ ::, Q_ 0 -, (lJ ;::~· -1 -, (1) OJ ~ OJ IT' ·< ~ (1) u 0 ;:i I I TRM Trinl Study NC01 Operators BR, RP, BC, SG, RH Operator Log Sheet Time II 13:5oj 14:ooj 14:101 14:201 Nova : co 0.4 1.0 1.4 1.6 CO2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 CI-M 0.0 0.8 1.5 1.9 H2 80.0 85.0 87.0 89.0 02 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 Micro GC: Benzene Nol Monochlorobenzene Operali anal Toluene for this lest CIMS: Benzene 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 Monochlorobenzene 0 0 0 0 Toluene 0 0 0 0 I I I I I System Temperature: TRM 1 604 604 600 597 TRM 2 614 619 621 621 TRM 3 552 573 578 579 Reactor Inlet 894 870 875 904 Reactor Outlet 854 858 862 865 Scrubber 1 23 24 26 26 Scrubber 2 21 21 21 21 EGF Inlet 326 306 290 304 EGF Outlet 290 288 290 290 Solids Pot Input 75 92 94 95 14:30 I 14:4011 1.7 1.8 0.3 0.3 2.2 2.4 89.0 88.0 0.3 0.3 7.9 17.0 0 0 0 0 I I 593 590 618 614 581 581 933 905 868 872 28 28 21 21 306 294 287 287 91 89 North Carolina Study Time I 13:50 I 14:oo I Gas Supply: Input H2 tank pressure 6000 5000 1-12 regulated pressure 150 150 Input 1-12 flowrale 8 6 R1 -flowrale 7 6 R2 -flowrale 5 4 N2 reed purge lank press 5000 5000 N2 reed purge flowrale X X lnpuUpurge N2 supply X X Propane supply X X System Pressure: Solids Pol 11.0 12.0 Scrub 1 -Gas 5.5 10.0 Scrub 1 -Solution 25 25 Scrub 2 -Gas 9 7 Scrub 2 -Solution 28.0 28.0 Feed Hopper 6 9 PG Tank 7 7 .. . . DGM1 14 12 pH: Scrub 1 11.51 11.34 Scrub2 11.21 11.17 System Volumes: DGM1 79.450 79.730 DGM2 53.530 53.780 PG Tank Flow 5 5 Page 14:101 4500 150 7 9 7 5000 X X X 6.0 5.5 25 10 28.0 6 6 12 10.81 11.14 80.040 54.050 5 1 of 3 Date: 2 June 1997 14:20 I 14:30 I 14:401 3500 2500 2000 150 150 150 7 7 8 8 8 8 6 6 6 5000 5000 5000 X X X X X X X X X 8.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 10.5 9.0 25 25 25 7 7 · 10 28.0 28.0 28.5 10 8 9 6 6 6 12 12 12 10.37 11.09 10.61 11.06 10.94 10.68 80.320 80.600 80.870 54.300 54.560 54.810 10 5 5 rn n 0 r--0 C) n )> 1) 1) (!) :J Q x OJ IJ ..... 0 () (!) v, I;-, CJ (lJ ru r--0 (JQ V, :r (!) (l) ~ 7J (lJ 00 (1) OJ
--Tri<1""'dy ------------ - -Page 2 of - -3 .---< llJ -, -, (1) :J n 0 C :J --< r-llJ :J Q_ 0 -, llJ .::i· --1 -, (1) llJ llJ C, --< ;>::J (1) ·o 0 ;:::i I I NC01 Operators DR, RP, £JC, SG, RH Time Nova : co CO2 CH'1 1-12 02 Micro GC: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene CIMS: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene System Temperature: TRM 1 TRM 2 TRM 3 Reactor Inlet Reactor Outlet Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 EGF Inlet EGF Outlet Solids Pot Input 11 14:50 I 1.8 0.3 2.3 88.0 0.3 19 0 0 II I 590 61'1 581 916 873 29 21 295 285 92 Operator Log Sheet 15:oo I 15:101 15:20 I 15:30 I 15:'1011 1.7 1.7 1.7 1. 7 1.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 88.0 88.0 75.0 83.0 87.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 Not Operali anal for this lest 17 16 12 16 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I 589 591 588 588 588 613 613 613 613 614 579 577 579 578 579 911 916 930 932 932 874 874 87'1 874 873 29 30 30 32 32 21 21 22 21 22 298 296 291 300 304 285 284 282 285 286 85 85 102 137 102 North Carolina Study Time I 14:50 I 15:oo I 15:101 Gas Supply: Input H2 tank pressure 14500 14000 13000 H2 regulated pressure 150 150 150 Input H2 flowrale 7 7 6 R1 -flowrale 6 9 8 R2 -flowrale 4 6 6 N2 feed purge lank press 5000 4500 4500 N2 feed purge flowrale X X X lnpul/purge N2 supply X X X Propane supply X X X System Pressure: Solids Pol 10.0 1,0.0 11.0 Scrub 1 -Gas 9.5 9.0 13.5 Scrub 1 -Solution 25 25 25 Scrub 2 -Gas 12 10 15 Scrub 2 -Solution 28 28 28 Feed Hopper 13 15 15 PG Tank 6 6 6 DGM1 15 14 15 pH: Scrub 1 10.31 10.10 10.45 Scrub 2 10.61 10.43 10.41 System Volumes: DGM1 81.20 81.47 81.75 DGM2 55.08 55.31 55.55 PG Tank Flow 5 5 5 Date: 2 June 1997 15:20 I 15:30 I 15:40 I 11500 11000 10500 150 150 150 10 8 7 6 1 '1 9 5 10 6 4000 4000 4000 X X X X X X X X X 15.0 2.0 8.0 8.5 6.0 11.0 25 25 25 9 8 7 28 28 28 13 7 10 7 10 6 16 14 1 '1 10.18 10.05 10.43 10.31 10.20 10.15 81.93 82.35 82.65 565.80 56.16 56.41 10 10 5 rn n 0 r-0 C) n )> 0 0 rt, :::i Q x· OJ IJ ~ 0 n (l) tn ,,.. CJ n., r, n., r-0 (JQ tn :::i-(l) (l) r, ,,. 7J llJ (JQ (1) CD Iv
- - - - - --· - - - - - - - - - - - -< n., -, -, (I) ::J n 0 C ::J ..... -< ' n., ::J Q_ 0 -, n., ;::::• ----l -, (1) n., ~· n., v ..... -< ?;J (1) u 0 ;:i I I Tl1M Trial Study NC01 Operators BR, RP, BC, SG, RH Time Nova : co CO2 CH4 H2 02 Micro GC: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene CIMS: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene System Temperature: TRM 1 TRM 2 TRM 3 Reactor Inlet Reactor Outlet Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 EGF Inlet EGF Outlet Solids Pot Input 11 15:50 I 1.7 0.4 2.3 88.0 0.2 1 '1 0 0 II I 587 612 578 925 873 32 22 298 286 95 Operator Log Sheet 15:ool 16:101 16:20 I 16:30 I 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.0 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 2.5 2.5 2.0 1.1 90.0 90.0 90.6 92.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Nol Operati onal for this test 1'1 16 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I 582 582 593 603 611 612 613 617 5130 5131 574 576 941 919 926 909 873 873 873 871 32 32 32 30 22 23 23 22 301 294 299 203 286 2138 2135 2134 100 98 104 101 · North Carolina Study II Time I 15:50 I 16:ool Gas Supply: Input H2 tank pressure 9500 8500 H2 regulated pressure 150 150 Input H2 flowrale 7 7 R1 -flowrale 9 9 R2 -flowrate 6 7 N2 feed purge tank press 4000 4000 N2 feed purge flowrale X X lnpul/purge N2 supply X X Propane supply X X System Pressure: Solids Pot 7.0 B.O Scrub 1 -Gas 6.5 6.5 Scrub 1 -Solution 25.0 25.0 Scrub 2 -Gas 9.0 7.0 Scrub 2 -Solution 28.0 28.0 I Feed Hopper 7.5 12.0 PG Tank 6 6 OGM1 12 13 pH: Scrub 1 10.23 10.07 Scrub 2 10.94 10.84 System Volumes: DGM1 82.94 83.24 DGM2 56.68 56.93 PG Tank Flow 5 5 I I I I Page 16:101 7500 150 5 9 7 4000 X X X 7.0 10.0 25.0 6.0 28.0 10.0 6 13 10.32 10.72 83.53 57.20 5 I 3 of Date: 2 June 1997 16:20 I 16:30 I 6500 5500 150 150 7 7 10 10 7 7 '1000 3500 X X X X X X 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 25.0 25.0 7.0 7.0 28.0 28.0 7.0 7.0 6 6 12 12 10.22 18.18 10.67 10.58 83.71 84.31 57.36 57.84 5 5 I I 3 I I rn n 0 ' 0 C) n ):,. 0 0 (I) :::i S2~ >< tlJ \) -, 0 n (I) ,,., ,,., CJ OJ ~ !\J ,--0 (JQ V) :::r-(1) (I) ~ "' \) n., (/Q (1) OJ w
- - - - - - -· - - - - - - - - - - - -.--< n., -, -, 11) :J n 0 C :J ~ -< ' n., :::; Q_ 0 -, n., .::l· -i ro n., ~ n., CT" ~< ;;Q 11) u 0 ;:::i TRM Trial Study NC02 Operators □R, RP, □C, SG, RH [ Time Nova co CO2 CH4 H2 02 Micro GC: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene CIMS: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene Operator Log Sheet II 12:351 12:451 12:551 13:051 13:151 13:2511 0.2 0.1 00 92.3 0.1 8.8 0 6.4 101 1.41 1.5 0.21 0.21 0.3 1.01 1.7 I 1.8 93.0I 92.31 92.7 o.o I o.o I o.o 44.0 0 5.7 Not Opera ti I on al for I this test 137.0 0 6.9 225.0 0 7.5 1.61 1.6 0.31 0.3 1.91 1.9 93.0 I 92-.9 0.01 0.0 289.0 0 8.4 319.0 •O 7.8 North Carolina Study Time Gas Supp_ly: Input H2 tank pressure H2 regulated pressure Input H2 flowrate R1 -flowrate R2 -flowrate N2 feed purge tank press N2 feed purge flowrate lnpul/purge N2 supply ProfJ_ane supply System Pressure: Page of 4 Date: 3 June 1997 I 12:351 12:451 12:551 13:051 13:151 13:251 12500111500111000 95001 80001 7000 1501 1501 150 1501 1501 150 7 9 71 71 71 8H 10 10 10 10 1011 6 71 71 71 71 7 16500 I 16500 I 16500 I 16500 I 16000 I 16000 X I X I X I X I X I X XIX IX IX IX~ X X X X X I X SolidsPot I 11.01 12.01 6.0, 8.0, 8.0, 8.0 Scrub 1 -Gas 5.5 · 10.0 5.5 10.0 10.5 9.0 Scrub 1 -Solution 25 25 25 25 hto5 25 Scrub2-Gas 9 7 10 7 7 10 Scrub 2 -Solution 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.5 I II I I I I I . ! I F ee~~o;:~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 11 : . DGM1 14 12 12 12 12 12 System Temperature: TRM 1 621 606 595 585 578 57511 pH: TRM 2 621 618 606 599 593 588 Scrub 1 11.511 11.341 10.811 10371 11.091 10.61 TRM 3 581 906 923 908 9_13 924 Scrub 2 11.211 11.171 11.141 11.061 10.941 10.68 Reactor Inlet 908 906 923 908 913 9:24 Sy_stern Volumes: Reactor Outlet 847 861 869 873 876 877 DGM1 79.450l 79.730l 80.040l 80.320l 80.600l 80.870 Scrubber 1 19 20 22 23 24 25 DGM2 53.530l 53.780l 54.050l 54.300l 54.560l 54.810 Scrubber 2 16 16 16 16 16 16 PG Tank Flow 51 51 51 101 51 5 EGF Inlet 332 330 334 328 336 EGF Outlet 350 350 353 352 354 353 Solids Pot Input 96 107 113 109 92 3401 87 I I I I I 1-1 n1 n 0 ' 0 Cl n )> 0 'D (1) :::, Q ><. OJ \) -., 0 n rt) ,,., tr, CJ n, ~ n, r---0 OQ v, ::r rt) (1) ~ tr, 7J n., (JQ (1) CJJ -'""
----------------------< (\J -, -, (t) ::J n 0 C ::J ...... -< ' n, ::J CL 0 -, n, ~-----j -, (t) n, n, u -· ·< ;;Q (t) v 0 ;:::i I I IHM Tri;il Study NC02 Operators OR, Rr, BC, SG, RI-I Time Nova : co CO2 CH4 H2 02 Micro GC: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene CIMS: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene System Temperature: TRM 1 TRM 2 TRM 3 Reactor Inlet Reactor Outlet Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 EGF Inlet EGF Outlet Solids Pot Input 11 13:35 I 1.6 0.3 1.9 93.0 00 334 0 8 i I 573 585 562 918 877 25 16 328 352 , 47 Operator Log Sheet 13:451 13:551 14:05 I 14: 15 I 14:25 JI 1.6 1.8 1. 7 1.7 1.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.0 2.3 2.0 2.0 1.9 92.7 92.3 92.6 93.2 93.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Not Operati onal for this test :I . : 352 373 399 390 384 0 0 0 0 ,o 8 8 8 8 8 . ·' I I I I I 577 581 576 577 574 593 596 601 603 602 562 563 565 654 565 903 915 929 906 918 878 879 879 879 878 26 26 26 26 26 16 16 16 16 16 332 323 327 322 ~:: I 352 346 345 342 71 68 68 North Carolina Study Time I 13:351 13:45 I Gas Supply: Input H2 tank pressure 6000 5000 H2 regulated pressure 150 150 Input H2 flowrate 8 8 R1 -flowrate 10 10 R2 -flowrate 7 7 N2 feed purge tank press 16000 16000 N2 feed purge flowrate X X lnpul/purge N2 supply X X Propane supply X X System Pressure: Solids Pot 7.0 ' 7.0 Scrub 1 -Gas 8.0 6.5 Scrub 1 -Solution 25.5 25 Scrub 2 -Gas 8.0 3.0 Scrub 2 -Solution 27.5 27.5 Feed Hopper 11 15 PG Tank 6 5 DGM1 13 13 pH: Scrub 1 10.82 10.54 Scrub 2 10.63 10.48 System Volumes: DGM1 88.60 88.88 DGM2 61.60 61.83 PG Tank Flow 10 5 I I I Page 13:55 I 4500 150 8 9 6 16000 X X X 10.0 8.0 25 8.0 28.0 10 4 13 10.22 10.31 89.13 62.02 5 I 2 of 4 Date: 3 June 1997 14:051 14:151 14:25] 3500 2500 2000 150 150 150 7 7 7 8 8 8 6 6 6 16000 16000 16000 X X X X X X X X X 10.0 10.0 10.0 8.5 8.5 7.5 25 25.5 25.5 8.0 10.0 8.0 27.5 27.5 27.5 9 9 7 5 5 G 13 13 13 10.53 10.33 10.17 10.95 10.88 10.66 89.46 89.78 90.12 62.26 62.49 62.75 5 5 5 I I I rn n 0 ' 0 C) n ):,. tJ tJ (1) :J ~ >< to -u -., 0 n (1) ,,., '" tJ n., ru r---0 (/Q v, ::r (1) ~ ,,., 7J n, (JQ (t) OJ UI
-------------------...-< OJ -, -, (1) :J n 0 C :J ·< ' OJ :J Q__ 0 -, OJ ;:::t· ------l ro ru _. OJ CT ·< ~ (1) D 0 ~ I I H{M Tri;:il Stucly NC02 Operators □R,RP,BC,SG,RH Time Nova : co CO2 CH4 H2 02 Micro GC: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene CIMS Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene System Temperature: TRM 1 TRM 2 TRM 3 Reactor Inlet Reactor Outlet Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 EGF Inlet EGF Outlet Solids Pol Input 11 14:35 I 1.6 0.3 1.13 94.2 0.1 373 1 7 II I 571 601 558 919 879 26 16 329 339 71 Operator Log Sheet 14-,151 14:55 I 15:05 I 15: 15 I : 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 94.6 94.13 95.0 95.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Not Operati onal for this test 359 3613 371 371 2 1 1 1 13 7 7 7 I I I I ' 574 5613 562 551 608 607 5913 5133 555 546 536 521 911 905 919 912 879 878 878 877 26 26 26 26 16 16 16 16 318 329 328 334 338 338 341 342 70 70 71 69 . North Cmolina Study 15:2511 Time I 14:35 I 14:45 j Gas Supply: 1.5 Input H2 tank pressure 13500 12500 0.2 H2 regulated pressure 150 150 1.7 Input H2 flowrale 8 7 95.5 R1 -flowrale 9 8 0.1 R2 -flowrate 6 6 N2 feed purge tank press 16000 16000 N2 feed purge flowrate X X lnpul/purge N2 supply X X Propane supply X X System Pressure: 357 Solids Pol 8.0 8.0 . 1 Scrub 1 -Gas 9.0 7.5 ·13 Scrub 1 -Solution 25.5 25.5 Scrub 2 -Gas 13.0 9.0 Scrub 2 -Solution 27.5 27.5 '; I ,. Feed Hopper 9.0 10.0 PG Tank 6 5 DGM1 13 13 541 pH: 574 Scrub 1 10.58 10.41 · 508 . ·•·· Scrub 2 10.55 10.45 905 System Volumes: 877 DGM1 90.47 90.80 26 DGM2 63.02 63.27 16 , PG Tank Flow 5 5 ~:i I I I I Page 14:55 j 11500 150 7 8 6 16000 X X X 9.0 7.5 25.5 8.0 27.5 8.0 5 13 10.28 10.37 91.08 63.49 5 I 3 of 4 Dale: 3 June 1997 15:05 I 15: 15 I 15:25 i 10500 9000 13500 150 150 150 7 7 7 9 9 9 6 6 6 15500 15500 15500 X X X X X X X X X 13.0 13.0 13.0 7.5 7.5 7.0 25.0 25.5 25.5 13.0 8.0 13.0 27.5 27.5 27.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 5 5 5 13 13 13 10.13 10.49 10.40 10.25 10.133 10.74 91.49 91.78 92.13 63.80 64.03 64 29 5 5 5 I I I rn n 0 ' 0 C) n ), tJ tJ Cl) ::i Q_ >< OJ \) -, 0 () Cl) ,,., ,,., CJ n, fu ,-. 0 ()Q ,,., :, Cl) Cl) r• '" 7J OJ (JO ro OJ (J'\
-~M --3tud,.. --- - - - - - - -~ag1'-- - -'1 of '1 ~ n, .., .., (D :::) n 0 C :::) -·< r-OJ :::) Q_ 0 .., n, ;:::.• --j .., (1) OJ -OJ CT" r> --< ;;Q (I) u 0 ;:i I I NC01 Operators BR, RP, BC, SG, RH Time Nova : co CO2 CH4 H2 02 Micro GC: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene CIMS: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene System Temperature: TRM 1 Ti<M 2 TRM 3 Reactor Inlet Reactor Outlet Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 EGF Inlet EGF Outlet Solids Pot Input Operator Log Sheet 11 15:35 I I I I I 1.4 0.2 1.'1 94.5 0.2 ., ' i ,. Not Operali anal for this test 302 1 7 I I 518 551 •.· • 1, '. 474 .. ' 913 : '. 875 ... 26 16 324 341 62 ,North Carolina Study II Time I 15:35 I Gas Supply: Input H2 tank pressure 6500 H2 regulated pressure 150 Input H2 flowrate 7 R1 -flowrate 9 R2 -flowrale G N2 feed purge tank press 15500 N2 feed purge rlowrale X lnpul/purge N2 supply X Propane supply X System Pressure: Solids Pot 8.0 Scrub 1 -Gas 8.0 Scrub 1 -Solution 25 Scrub 2 -Gas 9.0 Scrub 2 -Solution 27.5 Feed Hopper 9 PG Tank 5 DGM1 13 pH: .. Scrub 1 10.33 Scrub 2 10.67 · System Volumes: ,, DGM1 92.44 DGM2 65 PG Tank Flow 5 I I I 15:45 I I 9 6 X X X 9.0 8.5 25.5 9.0 27.5 9 5 13.5 10.27 10.62 92.76 65 5 I I Date: 3 June 1997 I I I I I I n, n 0 r-0 Cl n ),. 0 tJ <1) ::J Q x· tlJ 'l:J ..., 0 n (I) '" ,,., tJ (u r, (u r-0 VQ ..,, :::r-(1) (I) r, '" -0 OJ ()0 (1) OJ '-I
- - - - - - -. ----·· - - - - - - - - ----;> 0.,-. . (I) ::J n 0 C ::J ·< ' n, ::J Q_ ~. 0 . n, ;::!· -l . (I) n, ~ n, CT ·< :;,(] (1) ·o 0 ;:.\ I I mM T,ial Study NC03 Operators BR, RP, BC, SG, RH Time Nova : co CO2 CH4 H2 02 Micro GC: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene CIMS: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene System Temperature: TRM 1 TRM 2 TRM 3 Reactor Inlet Reactor Outlet Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 EGF Inlet EGF Outlet Solids Pot Input 11 15:25 I 0.2 0.1 0.1 81.6 0.4 13 0 4 II I 624 605 595 881 917 19 16 466 450 96 Operator Log Sheet 15:35 I 15:i15I 15:55 I 16:05 I I 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 1.2 1.5 1.5 98.7 92.9 94.8 95.1 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 Not Operati onat for this test : 26 67 127 177 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 3 I I I I I 627 630 633 633 607 610 610 612 598 600 605 608 889 883 886 881 920 922 922 922 20 21 23 24 16 16 16 16 469 464 463 462 455 456 453 453 90 92 92 95 ':North Carolina Study 16: 1511 ' 1.6 0.2 1.6 94.8 0.4 207 ·o ·3 . ' : I 635 614 608 886 920 25 16 ~~~ I · 94 · :1 -, ,, : :i I Time Gas Supply: Input H2 tank pressure H2 regulated pressure Input H2 flowrate R1 -flowrate R2 -flowrate N2 feed purge tank press N2 feed purge flowrate Input/purge N2 supply Propane supply System Pressure: Solids Pot Scrub 1 -Gas Scrub 1 -Solution Scrub 2 -Gas Scrub 2 -Solution Feed Hopper PG Tank I • •' • DGM1 pH: Scrub 1 Scrub 2 System Volumes: OGM1 DGM2 ' PG Tank Flow Visual Solids I 15:25 I 15:35 I 9000 8000 150 150 7 8 10 10 8 7 6000 6000 X X X X X X 8.0 8.0 9.5 6.0 25 25.5 6 9 27.5 27.5 10 11 6 5 12 12 11.29 10.97 10.82 10.67 2.370 2.710 73.200 73.460 15 10 I X I X I Page 15:451 7000 150 8 9 7 6000 X X X 7.0 6.0 25.5 10 27.5 7 5 13 11.50 11.30 3.070 73.740 5 X I or 3 Date: 5 June 1997 15:55 I 16:05 I 16: 15 I 6000 5000 4500 150 150 150 8 7 8 9 11 9 7 9 7 5500 5500 5500 X X X X X X X X X 7.0 6.0 7,0 5.0 6.0 6.0 25 25 25 5 6 6 28.0 28.0 28.0 7 7 G 5 5 5 12 12 12 11.16 10,75 10.44 11.22 11.09 10.91 3.360 3.680 3.980 73.980 74.230 74.460 10 10 10 X I X I X I rn n 0 ,--0 C, n ),. '"CJ '"CJ (1) :::, G. x· OJ \J .., 0 n (1) ,,, v, CJ n; ~ n; r-0 (JQ V, :::r (l) ro ~ '" 7J n, (JO (1) OJ co
---------- - ----- - - - --l < ? n,--, ro ::J n 0 C ::J ,.... ·< r OJ ::J o_ 0 -, OJ ;::::, -1 -, (1) n., d OJ CY ~ '<'. ;:,;J (1) u 0 :::.1 I I TnM Tri.ii Study NC03 Operntors OR. RP. OC. SG. RH Time Nova : co CO2 CH4 H2 02 Micro GC: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene CIMS: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene System Temperature: TRM 1 TRM 2 TRM 3 Reactor Inlet Reactor Outlet Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 EGF Inlet EGF Outlet Solids Pot Input 11 16:25 I 1.6 0.2 1. 7 94.6 0.4 233 0 3 II I 638 617 609 888 919 25 16 452 4'15 95 Operator Log Sheet 16:35 I 16:45 I 16:5s I 1.6 1.6 1.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 1. 7 1.8 1.9 94.5 94.4 94.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 Not Operati onal for this test 252 265 277 0 0 0 3 3 3 I I I 640 642 642 618 621 620 611 612 612 884 882 888 915 911 910 26 26 27 17 17 17 450 450 445 4'14 '139 '139 95 95 98 North Carolina Study 11:05 I 11: 1511 Time Gas Supply: 1.5 1.6 Input H2 tank pressure 0.2 0.2 H2 regulated pressure 1.8 1.9 Input H2 flowrate 93.7 93.2 R1 -flowrate 0.5 0.5 R2 -flowrate ' .. N2 feed purge tank press N2 feed purge flowrate lnpul/purge N2 supply Propane supply System Pressure: 287 285 Solids Pot 0 0 Scrub 1 -Gas 4 4 Scrub 1 -Solution Scrub 2 -Gas .. Scrub 2 -Solution I I Feed Hopper ······ .. PG Tank DGM1 ! 645 643 pH: 622 620 Scrub 1 614 614 Scrub 2 879 882 System Volumes: 906 906 DGM1 28 28 DGM2 17 18 .. PG Tank Flow 4'14 441 I 435 '132 Visual Solids 93 .94 Page I 16:251 16:35 I 16:451 3500 2500 2000 150 150 150 8 8 8 9 9 11 7 7 9 5500 5500 5500 X X X X X X X X X 6.0 6.0 6.0 G.0 6.0 G.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 6 6 6 5 5 5 12 12 12 10.16 10.82 10.51 10.69 11.32 11.17 4.30 4.62 4.99 74.72 74.97 75.26 10 10 10 I X I X I X I 2 of 3 Date: 5 June 1997 16:55 I 11:05 I 11: 15 I 14500 13000 12500 150 150 150 8 8 ,,.8 11 11 11 9 9 9 5500 5500 5500 X X X X X X X X X 6.0 G.0 7.0 5.0 6.0 G.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 5 G 6 5 5 4 13 12 12 10.29 10.86 10.58 11.00 10.82 10 66 5.30 5.63 5.96 75.52 75.79 76.0G 10 10 10 X I X I X I rn n 0 r 0 C) n )> l:J l:J (1) ::, Q x· en \) -, 0 n (1) v, V, CJ n, ;:;; r--0 IJQ <r, ::r (1) (1) ,-.. V, \] n., (JO (1) OJ \.0
- - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - -..-< rv -, -, (1) ::J n 0 C ::J ~ -< r OJ ::J Q_ ---,, 0 -, OJ ;:t· -j ro C\J ~ C\J IT' ~ -< 70 (1) ·o 0 ;:.i I I TRM Trial Study NC03 Operators BR, RP, BC, SG, RH Time Nova : co CO2 CH4 H2 02 Micro GC: Benzene Monochlorober1zene Toluene CIMS: Benzene Monochlorobenzene Toluene System Temperature: TRM 1 TRM 2 TRM 3 Reactor Inlet Reactor Outlet Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 EGF Inlet EGF Outlet Solids Pot Input 11 17:25 I 1.6 0.2 2.0 93.0 0.6 302 0 4 II I 641 621 616 879 904 28 17 437 '13-1 92 Operator Log Sheet 17:35 I 17:45 j 17:55 I 1. 7 1.7 1.7 0.3 0.3 0.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 93.0 93.2 93.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 Not Operati onal for this test 326 345 352 0 0 0 4 5 5 I I I 642 640 644 620 621 621 615 613 614 872 869 866 904 904 904 29 29 29 17 18 18 437 434 429 431 430 430 95 90 94 -,North Carolina Study I :I 18:05 I 18: 1511 Time Gas Supply: 1.7 1.5 Input H2 tank pressure 0.3 0.2 H2 regulated pressure 2.2 1.8 Input H2 flowrate 93.7 92.8 R1 -flowrate 0.5 0.5 I R2 -flowrate ! N2 feed purge tank press -N2 feed purge flowrate Input/purge N2 supply Propane supply ' -· . System Pressure: 358 340 Solids Pot 0 -0 Scrub 1 -Gas .5 4 Scrub 1 -Solution .. Scrub 2 -Gas Scrub 2 -Solution I I Feed Hopper PG Tank DGM1 ' 642 652 pH: 621 -623 Scrub 1 611 610 Scrub 2 868 868 System Volumes: 903 904 .. ' DGM1 29 28 DGM2 18 18 PG Tank Flow 426 425 I 427 ·425 Visual Solids . :~ Page I 17:251 17:35 I 17:451 12000 11000 10000 150 150 150 7 8 8 11 11 11 9 9 9 5000 5000 5000 X X X X X X X X X 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 5 5 5 12 12 12 10.58 10.41 10.28 10.55 10.45 10.37 6.25 6.56 6.81 76.29 76.53 76.80 10 10 5 I X I X I X I 3 of 3 Date: 5 June 1997 17:55 I 18:05 I 18 15 I 9000 8000 7000 150 150 150 7 8 7 11 11 11 9 9 9 5000 5000 5000 X X X X X X X X X 6.0 6.0 9.0 6.0 6.0 9.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 6.0 6.0 9.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 6.0 6.0 9.0 5 5 6 12 12 13 10.13 10.49 1040 10.25 10.83 10.74 7.19 7.44 7.80 77.07 77.22 77.47 5 10 10 X I X I X I rn n 0 r 0 C) n )> \J \J (t) :J o_ ><. OJ I) -, 0 n <1) ,,. v, CJ Qi r, Qi r--0 OQ v, ::r <1) fl) r, v, 7J rv [JO (1) OJ 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIXC
I
CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------------. 0 Cu[NT Cl 1/\IN-OF CUSTODY ------S/\MPLErrs-·SIGN/\ TURE v&f!2Z,J;tt,,,___,, ----~-CL,~~Q '.)J:'.L~uuuuu~ '.;~ -----I . . .. , ........ · ... · .... ·'.· .. -'··· ---··-·:-· .... _ ----·--· .. :·~ ........ c ... :.:: __ ---·-----·--------------··· ··---__ · .. c. -· ·-----·--· .. ~:: -·· .:..,( ____ ·-_· ___ · ..... ··------_.-.............. -. ··-·•---·-·----·-··----·-···~-·--·-··---·--..... -,· ....... ___ · ... =.-.. ,, I /\11i1lpi!.. Wi111led: ~ ,-o" ,,--~ --._:,-() -I · . ---t., l (/.\ \t, v:>~~ ·1.. ~'.-) ~\) ·---1) ~. ·~ J ~; ·5 ~ I'"'"" 1:n, l.or,ic I ·LI I >,·1111i:; '.;1. C1111l.1tl: liliz;ilwtli Chi:d111li11 1'1111111:: •I lll-(,'/1- ✓.lll'J H11t:kw11t1d, 011l;1ri11 NOii ✓.KO I'.,,: J 19-IIJ(,-9,.:IJ Co11to1iner!..: Tot;il N111111Jr.r of 1----,-~ 1-L .i\ n__Q -:t -~a'd~~ __ (_~::?"'-~-~"!/\} ~l) ·-If 1111: dal;1 will lie rqwrtcd lo,.'.'. ~'.~;1~1~ }.~);t~lll'~, which 011d_.____ ll ~---c)~·-~. J~. ~. ___ .. , _ :c:.=:c:c:.::__ l'111j,·, 1: /\l1t:rd1T11 l1n1vi11g C1t>t111d 1'.0.11: _L/._g ::,L__. __ . \ .• ?;1111piciNillllU_==~r~ Dille J~Tiine , __ c;11p -i-Gr.ill-,_-Mi~llix -----=r-·Sillllple /\111I. 1:=-=1=1_·_1 __ .. , __ -, nern;irl(S ---·····-·---~~---~-' /Ir ✓C-_--f~1/-·--s· --·--· ~IH{/ 'I -J ·co---------j I Soi L --,--.-·--·---.. . -, !--i---·r-,---,--,L,Ll-}'i'/:C,\-\l;,-l)-··~'.(----,l._-·---·-·--···-----------·--./.--· _____ / _Q~-----------------1 ~---l--l-/--l--1--1--1--------------------· .-L 1/ I\) C --R / -<'.' I \ oz ·. co I --·---·------·-..,_,) ----·------------/JC -f<I -S / o?,·c,o / <;,o,L ·······-·-----------·-----------·----__ , ____ _ ---SD1L N c -_(!1. -_~o -_l.l_ __ l _ _l~)(l -2° I_. __ I I 1_!:-~1t1t C. :<7-. ---· NC -f< 1 -S :,,) -J ofl.;. )_o ___ / I w r) -, . --·----------------·-··--------------------·---------·1~: ---NC --p I -S,J -.) il · . .5;) 1--./ I ~-,J f\TE 0 •-•• --•••• -• • •--••H•--------•••--•--• ----••-----------•-/V C -k.> I -SJ -.. ) ____ _ll: S--o_ ____ / I 1.it.l /\1~ r2. "N (; _-.(' I _:_.S0 __ ~;J __ ✓/_. J~.f~_ 1---· ✓ E[Z. t,U f.~ ·,z_ ----/v (.::.__1_(1/_-_ 5 l( __ ft/I( 5}, /') 'i,{J 1 __ _ L__j,~fl'IT CJ ------rL NC -/';_ .-_s·tj_ fvJ!f.~{r /:roJ NC. .. -_/!.I.--s·y ---.. !l"(.~/n_JJ_:2_q . ·::-------------= ---/ lun-ie: 1------/ l~.£ljJ.: U---5_'1l L -_ll: . .9-__ ~L 7·-_J.CXJ(J r0L !I ------r _:f ---·· --· j/ --------·-,I -----77 --·-y --:;-✓ L.L l,Yi t C /\ -r 1.: \) .:.o il_ -v-1--1--, L.<.."-.l•~'-G(n·~) . .:J' IL .. --•---•--•~sc:. ,~ Llt\i.-\-r.~:--c:0~~,:rt::,-!_~----1·',:.: ( -f:'v.. 1j ' 1 1:_.e:y,:v._(!.J'.(c.1,_'_ ,,...'il'ICI.~ _, _,_, Pr;c -f.'.LL.,J --·------. ·---'.j!./?. ,~ llf!.i?'C'_ vJ mCI<_ --,--,--, pc~~-i-/<\,t_l,.l ,.Pe12.-1"=Ci"1f\/' SQ Ov-.C.['C:P.. w f'fnc:r?-__ , __ , __ 1(b~;-i--P~0_1_C.!~1;:::.:lf.:::gr1 I\ r, j ~.(~~_v-.r.J'FC-lAJ~-r'.:~-.---·•--•--~'::. l~f6,i,_.t:l.1J'.LL_L':',1::'.!.!l.\f SQ. el)...rP.:cc. w nn::1L __, __ , __ ,Pi:'.:iL::R.~~-,(:•\J?J:::X(CJ:.iQ(j (,_c. /?. IA 11,('.'.,c e_ lJJ ,1·, l:-Q_ --•·-•--~-~l -(2.u 1-i J\._~A :r?_C_'i]~J>j ~.nr_v...,\lf:i.:e... W,"·rr:::rc / rosr ✓@,~ 1✓_1 (-:\::1;;-,· -·r;-:_e.r/r, e f . 1.11:_l},'1:Jl.}trJ' _lly;Jiu2' D;1lefri111e I llecelved !Jy/Si\J lleli11qui!.lled lly/Slun. [);1tefTiine ncceivcd lly/Siu11 . .. ,:(;;/(<lI::.&ldJ~t)U;,,\_/ . i~~/2-, /j:it----1 tel(i1quislied Uy/Siu 11. Daleff1111e I llccclved !Jy/S1~! __ :.~;.=.·....:.·.·.:=--.:-·_·.·------------:.-:--~;;:-~---···------------.-----I lec.:eivcd fur L11>or;1lory 1Jy/Siu11ature 0;1\etri111e ·-_; _____ .;:.;._-----.::.:..::....;_;_--;...::=:..:..=-------------------------. --------------. -------· I, nell11quished Dy/Siu11. D.itcfTirne lleccived Liy/Si\Jll. -----------·--·---------------------· ____________ .:...-:-::. . ---------------. ----------'.;t'lnl !i;1111ph-:; lo: Tri.111ulc l;11lori1loric!.., Ille. Attn: S.1111ple Custocli;in 001 C.ipltoln Drive Dwlli1111, NC 2n 1 J u SA Pho11c: (!Jl!J} S'1'1-S72!J • r-.,x: (<JlC)\ r.,i,1.r.,1<11
------) -------------. f . . ~~ 7-o( L C LI I: r~T ·c·i:,-/\·I t~-o,; c·u-s·.-,~·Ol)_Y .. --------·-----·····S-J\-M·,J·;~•E·i:1··s s ic~i~ Al:u·rl·[(/l~cl0G·:~iio~0--··-·-··-·---.---1~/0._03G50/0U0-000-0~1 ;;;; ... , -c · ... •.· .. , =~~'.'''·-·: =.:.',·-". "c.'"-=·'='='=='=:C:=".:.~==c:=:.:::_~::.=•=--::.:,_~::c.::::'=':==:=-:-:=:=.:::: :::::,=;-::-: .: ::::.' .=::::-..::: :::,-="'-='/.,::_::-= =-='=-"-=..,."-===.: =· .... =-~.:.:.. ___ ·-·-· ··-···'·...:..-·'-" ---···. =-·-=--·-. _.:__.:· _ ::.;c::.=:~=:c':'===-==-c'" -· · --.. 1 1:,.,,.,: 1:,11 I .111:i,· C:0111.,i:1: l:li:1.;tl,<:111 Clii:;liul111 /\11;ilysls W;inted: Tot.ii Nll1111lcr of l·t:I l>t-111,i'.;'.,l. Ill) ("'/I .,1 JJ -~~ \_ C · 1·1111111•:, . , . .,. l' ,.....-;---, 0. ·-'-? -~ ~ 011l;i111crs: I-·_ l{11ckwoud, 01llario NOil 21<0 I' ... : ~ 19·11'.i(,.9·2:1'.i ~.J. ~ ;~1 . :-:r. l --D -I -..SI ....___,, 1:..,~><J I •• v . , \l} l'111jn I: 1\l1erdt-c11 l11 uvi111: Crtl\11111 1'.0.//: __ _{/s 3 L-~-'------~ '·J-~ )~ ti_ '.) 'd c{)) C d _J '>-11. _(~~?O~ ~~-~-[·~-·· If lht'. d'.11;1 will be rl'pmkd tu a !;t;1(=~1gi:11~2'._,_:~~~11d -·-· I[. (1: ·-·~ _-§; \-:!_ -~~--------··--·--···-----·-••·--_ ..... ;;~::;~;;~-r~~::--··-· --1 D;, .. ;c .I Ti;ne I .. Colllp I. Grnl> I Ma~;~~-.. __ I Sn111plc /\1111. I__ I __ I __ I _ _I __ I llc111;ir\('.; _ _ _ --·--\ . ·-· ······--·---·······-·--·---·--··--.. ··---.. -... ··-. .. __ ..... -. -·· ----····--·----·-----· .. ---··-·---~r; ---··-.. --·-----·-·-·· .. _.-...... -.. -..... _·,-··· ! IIN .. C. .. ··f?..(_:~c; ~~-=--· j,,.!G:h· _1i:_:2t' ---/ So\ l-__l_-:;J 5 ,)') L yj_ -·-·--reol1T:O ~-0 t. I _t) ':.., N_L_.~..!?.L~-~-~--_ .. _ 1i ·. )_~ _____ _:I ____ .'2.~1_!_~: _____ /J_5 ,rn L __ !/ 7J, T P-n1sc.O "'"·' o '. ~'.'.NC -.J? I -~~(~ ---·-_1i: )0 ----. ,/ -__ So, l._ .. ___ -1l u ,n I.__ ---·--~I :tt--1 -r,.,-~er"ITt":() S1L. l D ~.) /\JC-f<J-2}~) 1i·:30 ./ S'o1L (.)1::;o,,nL ✓ 112.\2"(ffl::0 ~.(>L-10S \ ··----·-·--... ---·-··-·-----------··-----------·1c ·----is f\1{~ ·t)l'~-FIL:ll7'1'~.·-~,---··· J/\JC,c;;i:~;~t-·l··-L~;:~•---~ --~1_!c[l~~-=~~~-~::rz& ✓---,~ ::~·~·)),<,,,,.,.,······ /\IC:::.~ ....... :,.?.,·?_..-.. ---------·-------_LU~Ll~ --------_ ·--_1A1C_ll1.\L.~-1-... --···-··---·-··-·-·· -f I\ !'Y-t L1::-,e . /1 11,, r f>o ,-. . ·-----,-----, ' ,. ' ' ,c~cie.r0::::15··-----,)(-f.,:,--~~(Vi)!)/(~·'·;y· (),.,r, L '-t --•·--•---,----·•----, ~J..;; -.. ·-__ -· _ ..:-2?. •. u __ ,_··----·--··---· ---• -------------,___ D-----1--1---·----•--•-----_________ _ ------1---------l--1·--1--1--1--1--------•--·· \ --··-····--·-···--______ '=======~•==~ _ _ 1_ I I l I_ l l I ·.:------_::.~:. ..•. llcli11q11i!;l1ed IJy/Si[Jll. _;/iyC!.u..~1f>.flr,t__ __ lkl111q11i~l1ed Uy/Siu11. 0;1lcf~r· llC lt<N(!JL[_l:i,iv---------l-------------l-----1-----D,1tc/ ·1i11e ncccivcd Dy/Siun. ncccivcd fly/~,iu11. lleli11q11ishcd Dy/Siu11. flcll11q11lshcd Dy/Siu11. Di1lcffi111c D;1lcffiinc fleccivetl l1y/~;iu11. lleceived Lly/~i\JIL ......... ._..... =:c.=::::::=::=======:::: .I _ _::::::::::::::c:_::=~~ I L 1-::. -.. -_ • ........ -··c:=: .:.::.::;:.':_ I -··------. -._ __ --··-lkceived for L..1l>0rnlory Oy/Siuni1l11rc Di1lctri111c '.>end S;1111plt•:; to: Trlanulc Li11Jor;ilorie!i, Inc. /\lln: Si1111plc C11slodia11 001 Cnpilol;i Drive Dmharn, NC 2n I :J US/\ l'llonc: {!JI!)) !i'1'1•!j77.Q • F;tx: (919) 'it1t1.r;1Fll .· _-______ . -------·-· ------•------~--------------------·•-··--··· -.. ---
- - - -- ---- - -- - -- ----. () (-··) . ' . ()__,~-/ I U,' (__. ( J C LI !:NT :c 11/\I t✓ ~OF .. C.USTODY ~=--==:·==--==cc.S/\M p Lr:n·s· SIG,l✓/\TU ll E crit'Z .. ,:ll.~l!i-'t--/·cc=-:.==--:= ..... -C ••• _ P/Q. OJGG0/0000000'1 !)11·'" .. . . . ,:c=, :.=.cC=.:7.'::C:: :7; :'::::.=;=:::=~:=:. :'c':=:~:'c:C-.:.-c-:C:C::.~--.: .. _ .::·==-c:=--··. 7~:=.'::'C:=~c;:,:::;::,:..:.c::".'":':-,'=·:::·::::;::~. ·,,_::_.·;:':-7·=-= :;,-:__:.:,-.:c·= -,:=::=-:--=o::.'=C:=:/ .· ::;=:,:=: ;:~=.:c.·:::·c-.. :C:.-"=c£~C:":=-':~C:.=...':~-::.:::::::::~.:.·.::_-;;--... --·•=-:.--·~-="•C.::=.::::.:··.::;::-;c·::::,':.'°.:." : .. 1 r11•11t. h II I .111:ic C11e1l,1d: l:li:1.;d1dl1 Clii::1111l111 I fl I )l'1111i:; '.il. 1·1.,,,,.,: •I lll-(,i'l-'llll'J l<ockwoud, 011L11io NOIJ 'lKO l',.,j,·<1: /\lwrdc1•11 l'rovi11g Cro1111d I'.,-: ~19-Wi(,-9D'.i G ·1. ... I'.() II: _{/.JL"::_:_!/2 __ /\11~~ W;111tcd: , 0 ,--:::---,_ ti ~ 1 C.) • . , ( ~ . r! ( ~ ._, J \~ '--.. ....J.) ~ .}; '\,( { '> ...____ \.L )·· \ I.:'.("\ t· v) -.__ ·'·0 ,.__ -1.: C C V:. ' ..J ;--l Tot;II 1'Ju1111Jer ol Con l;li11ers: ( 1-CJ '-.J -~)). . _ (_EC0_09_J/\,JIJ) ==---==:.:.--cC==l(-llw tL1l;i will b1~ reported lo ;i :;l;1te a1:<~11cy, which 011e7 _____ ll_d: _ ~ 5,_.\~ .. c[_·:====::-:.==::::==::::-:-.:::=.:=-==·=· \·-Sample. N;i111e ==[ 1);1(1?_~1 Co111p_l _ Gr;11J]=-M;ilrix~~--=1-S;1111pl.e /\1111.-]=r=1=:i=1=1--ne111;11l(!i==····~~~~-~--~~~--' A/C_-:-_1?..~ -.s I k~~?1d_, __ , 7 I. ~011= __ ,_L?6 n1L I ~1_1__1_1_1~/\}_jj}.._(f)Jl.C:j)_~~'.I_~ NC -f<,? -SJ .. ·-·--------------•·-/\JC._~_ //;J _-.SJ_ __ , __ N, 0-1 C') / C -· '" ·>< -.:,;, -/(. t'"J ') c· ··1 / I' ..... -(\ ,_;,( -.),_-.( -··········---· --------------------,--,, (,-;) c· J J N l, -\ --~\_;, -,---------------------------·•--· i 'J ') -r· ... . I /\J (. .-/, J -_-:,,) -.) I . ·-·----·-···---------•-' f) / < N l .• -/ ... ) -_) tj .. ---------------------•-------------·-· I ··--I irJc.· __ -_.!_{!.)_-S_2 -_J •---1') C _-I{;) -.SL(-. ----------•---! rvt~~,lJ'.) :: ... ?':f . __ _ ~v ·------. ---------· -(... I teli 1_}:)l,1 h \H! y I l y/S iy11. .. ~ (,t ( },_ c_ -L /(<V L7,1 . ..-.. ""·-·· --------·------lleli(iqui~IH!d Uy/Siu11. / ---·------✓ --· ···--------· ✓ ---✓ ----· .. ✓ --------✓ v ---✓ ✓ ---I .. .. <. __ >-! _$.{, l-U _0.)_ /,J wf I,<.) tJI? _(Jj t/v ?. IL. ~U.,=----),LT;:_ ... /} 1 Tl:: I._ . TFJ'.:. -----TEI'.:.. 1,0::.. ---------/~--rn.::::--C __ /_c).:};·/'r'l L IJO ,·n L --· ---· _/..C'OO ,y, L ·-----· ---j1 I I -•·--'-c1-•-•·-✓ ,i }1-··1··---·1-1-·1·.::x~/2<.L.((0[~CY:'1 Lt.Jl)·Jk.l?·-----··· ------___ (JtU:. -I<. <.U-...J y 11 /I-=~~~== ~~~~t;:'·:· (,1r~t~~~-:~1,1· / ,1 ---•---•---•---•---•----------------/_ --···· ✓1--------·rr(,:'L,L(',(IE(2.. u.J I\ ,L-:C.IC_ ✓ __ f~•s·1· · f.!~,,-l1 _{'o•;-,· ·in:1·,,1,c --✓1 --·--. '!I ,, ,, -•--•-•-•7 {\ l'J_TE .<:_ . . 'I .. --···------·-···•-··-----~= ---------------------------,--·--·----·-·-·····-···-·--·--···· O;ote~"" nccciv( •d 11 y/Slq11. llcll11q11i~llcd Dy/Si~ I I. IJ.itefTi,nc neceivecl l.1y/~,iu11. Jv. tc-r: lLJ!L 'L' -----· Date ri,nc lleceivl 'd n y/Slun. llcli11q11isllcd Dy/~ 11, D.ilcfrimc nccciV<!d Dy/Siu11. --·------·--------------------. -----..... ---------------------·-·--. -------------· ----·---·--'····-·. --· ·-·-· -. ll<:ceived fur L;llrnralory IJy/Siun;iture D;1lcfTi111c '.il'111I ~;;1111ph-s l11: Phone: .··..:.;:;...:.:.:_:.:::..~..=:....:..:.=.:-:=-..:.-=-:.;---=...-...=.=:·~· I.. -·:---::;::-Trl,111\Jle Lillwrntorie'.,, l11c. /\1111: S;unplc Cuslodi;111 00 I Capitola Drive D11rlla111, I-IC 7.771 :J US/\ {!ll()) :i'1'1-s,n. r-;I)" 1q1q, ,7v r· A " ~
I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----- ---------------·•--. -·--·· -----------------------------------------------·-------------------------------·-:--------------:-.--·--====-------------·------------·-·· CLll:t'1T Cll/\lN OF CUSTODY S/\MPLEtl'S SlGN/\TUnE ___________ _ P/0 03G50/0000000'1 !i11 .. -.. _-:~.-~~-~.-.-.::.:.:::: :=-·=:....·=~=-·:.:.·.=.-:....-::-..:-=::.:..:=---:~.--'".:::.:..::~.::-_--:.-::::.::::~--=--~::::.:.-:::.-==-=-~---~----=-=:·: . ====="---=-=:-==-----------:.·.-==:-.-===--=~-----·-· ::~~---~:::::~:. __ ··--------· ,,,..,,., 1:.ct1 I .t11•,ic c,,111.,.-i: l:li.,._;dn·lli Chi::111,!111 I ·LI t J,•1111i:; '.;1. 1•1,.,11,,; •II().(,'/ I -'l.I09 l{ol"kwood, O111ari11 NO!l 2KO i: ... : ~ I9-Wif,.lJD~ -i: 1•,.,j,·cl: /\lwnli:c11 l11ovi11,: Cn>t1111I l'.ll.ll: /\11,'.!,Ysis W;intr.d: ---..._ ,,.----.-_ .,,.---....._ () 9. ..... <. ~ ~, ;__ .:;. . ') ;_i\ 0. ~.J -t?·: .\ ~ . -.....:.__, ' J-~ . '¾.. ) ........__ , L.\.. :Y;J-~ cf ~ .:\~1 ~ ::) Tot;ll N111111Jcr of Contaillcrs: ( 7----__ (~-~?.?.~-~~~-~)____ I[ th~: __ d_o1t;1 will be repollt•d lo ii st;1le __ ;11;1:1~?• ~vhid~ 111w'. -=--~--__ l[___~t __ cj _? _ _\-:1_ -~-----------------···· ______________ _ 1· ~;;: ""' ''" . . . ..• l.~~ ... l _ ~0] _.'.:'.'.~~-l _."""'J ~~~~~ :· _____ l .. .:':'"~."~ ... c;1 ::::I:::: 1::::::c:1 _ _,;-:~~-~;;, ·:.:·==: ·. J <( '!i ;J__Q_-:_(!_3.~ S_{ ___ f•~l<·fh-____ ____ _ / S.,.,, L. _I ;).:5 m L _{I _77 _______ LA. >J,-et:-fl n~'? __ S,o ~~-=---'{') _N~:.-_ _f_:_?.; -$_/_ _______ ,___ ✓ 5_<::"'_L!::_-____ {;J~'.5 ry1L __ y_ ✓1_ ___ __ ,, l/,1 Iv(: -(<'?)·-~-;I --------t/ So' l. I/ 0 ,-..-1 (_ L I ., . · -J, Sc k!c1 e,:y-r__~ 1.-0 ."l·n 1:.'. '(~, II N.t_-:_({ __ _?2_.-~~0-=-L. _ _ ___ ____ / Lu ()-,l'.'.C _ I O?L1 01 L Y _·_ __ __ ___ (-'r'c .. r< ,. ,J q'! t,Jc__-.J{~'t_·:..?!.~.=_/_ __ __ ___ __ -~-_ llJ,,·n:);'~ --· ____ ____ j __ :, 1/~ tJC _ a::~-<;-:i -1 · / LUn :·, J/--------:Jc'.2,1(./~~-c. ~,,.'1-;/:L --· --·""----·--·-·---~---f',/.-,---1--------· -··----~-l. v -::>r J J . ·1·c ---,,-. -~------------------J •~7 -1-'' ~ (. -/<.J-1,1\1. '{(l .f'::-1.C-f(:; ·-s·:J -,/ __________ 1_1L__ tu1-1,-u: __ ___ ~ --,---~=-----.·,---· ----------1'' llrvc.~(1_)_-~~;~_L--_(?:I --~IL_j ____ j ___ j_v~-l_td r,,t~l': __ -------·-----I " , ------/ ------v_ 'Jl 10 c -(< ~:i..,. 51.; ___ L u n-n" v/ ---.s.•.::.,"--;,,,_:~ c ,,u ,,-;zt!.:.:-·--·-,· ·1,, -· ----.--------· -_ ------_!·---~-=--:_--------✓----// --____ f..o<,1....::._t_:.':..!..-!..,.(k~_1r1_:i~1,_:. J _/~_Lrf:>· _c;lJ__ ___ / iu n,-cr. ___ 1 _____ 1 __ Y ,, r:1; t~so.~~.r< ?J .=§ 1J-_ .. _____ -·--------~ . I (;Jf),EJ( __l ~ _I__ I _I_ I L JJ ,\ -.-. ---- -_---. =·-~::::·..:=-~------· J"lcll11q11l~llcd lly/Siu11. l);iterrli11c rtcc:clvcd IJy/Si!.Jll. ncll11q11lsllcd Uy/Sl!.Jn. Dalcrfimc f11!c:civcd Uy/Si\Jll. !fl -----------!------, ' 1---------------1------1-------------flclinquisllccl 0y/Slu11. DnlcfTlmc ____ ..::=---==-,------flt:ccived for Lnlioratory 0y/Siunal11rc nccclvcd Dy/Sl11n. Dntr./rh11c ncll11q11lslicd Dy/Slun. Dillcrfimc !;,:11d !;a1nl'll':, lo: Trla11ulc Lnl>oratorics, l11c:. /\1111: Sa111plc Cuslodl,111 001 Cnpitola Drive Durlla111, NC 2"/71 J US/\ I' 11 o I H!: ( !J I !J) S 11 '1 -!i 72 !J • f-a X: ( 9 1 9) !i '1 '1-!i '19 I ··--······-··-·· ··----------------------------·------------------------ll1!ccivccl 1Jy/Si(111. --------·-···-··--·-·--·-·-·-··
-<'t ,; ;-;·t; ,~1,· .'~,Lu ,'I,~,~ ------------------CLIENT CII/\IN Or: CUSTODY S/\MPLEFl'S SIGN/\TUllE __________ _ P/0 03G50/0000000!J!i1l ·-·-··--·---··-······-···. -· ......... ·1 ... _ ... -.... ··. -·--· ·--. ---------------------·-·•--·-··--· -·--·. -_---·-•·---·_-·. -··-····-· ·-------·-··--· ··----·--.----·-·-·i --·11 ··-.. -------··--··--··········-. -·-··· I""" 1·10 I 111•,11· c .. 111.,.i: l·.l11;1lwtlt t.lt1sltul111 /\11~ys1s )Yi,!nlcd: -\0 I otal Numller of 1,1:11>,·111\i•,'.;1. IILJ('/1 '/.f!l'J ----...... o" \j '5.1'1:J C I. 1·1,.,.., .. , , -. lj-,ll:i , .:f'' 011 ,11ne1 s: H11L·k woo.I, 0111.11 io NOil 2KO F ... : .'.i I 'J-lJ'.,(,.')2:1'., ~ ~ ' ) \'.; ·~\~1 1•1,.1,·<1· Alll'1d1·1·11 l'1ovi11g C:1u1111d l'.ll.1/: ---· ~~-~ -~ -~;~ f\ ~~ ;~ II /7 d) 5? ·,JJ :j \t ~ (l:CO0~ //\JlJ) If lite d;1la will lit• 11°porl1·d 111 ii :;l;lle a1:1·11ry, wltklt 011d -· II Q ,;.:_ ~ \-(}< r-~~l~t~I~-;:;-::---· __ .L Daiei l__n11c I ~OlllJI _I_ Grnll I __ Matrix . L S;11nplc /\1111. I __ L_I __ L __ l __ r rte111.~rl1s---. _______ -·1 .61 C. .. =-q-a-=-.55~-~1k ___ ·---·-···---/ •· ,so, L·-------. _J_/),_!)-f)'I L -_1_ ~-1 __ _1 _ _1 _i-, f! t (J_·.rrJ2_\Qu.i!~?_.· J\JC .. ::.I~3...::..::::5-____ \ ____ . ___ / .':;o,L . __ /;J5111l-~ ~ 1 " .. NC...-1(~--s·s-·--' _______ _!__ SOIL _'!OmL ---7--;-:I " .. f:JC..::_f,_>":)_.=_-~.r~----___ , ____ , / _5,o' (. ~.'.)-iJ /11 l_ -../ --, ------11 ··-·----· . .. r•·· , .. • h j:l ~·, z~, ",/.!... o~-r F•Cllcl'_ ✓ .. P.iC.:: .. G:.:}:~.:.:.i.J.~J_ ·-------------'----__ ./ ____ _1-1 L.I..':.: f? ~se--/~t,h :.!-~-.::JI·( . V ,/ _ ----_j l-<..J(c l(',rr. __ -1:· ___ ---·-·-_ /\)(' 1:·:;, _c:~ -'") I :~ ... ·' _, /1 _,,? l.(.,, l,L/ l!,/ l),a /)1!1 r,,,i".k'. I . -/c :.J ,.J . ..J -,<_ ✓ f IC-I I.(__ .) < ""-.,e:....__,,_ .__ /_ ,/ ./ fA.J re· I ( JI •I ······-···--····---·····•---·(.·· -··· -------·· --------· -----·.C-.---· -------·-------------____ I----··----·--·--··--··-· -·-------1-----1-----1----1-----r----------------I·-----1------f ~ J:t'·~-~= ~~~:'J/ ~'./(:(;['( -·----1---1---1 ---i---i------i------_______ ~:{-,~~-:, 1/;,lc_ ---· _:;-_·::·;· __ --·-:-··--___ -=.,":..,.. ----------------.------------1---_-___________ -.-----------------------.. :-_.:::-::::-=.·=:::.:;: .. -:·:• I leli11quisl1ed LJy/Siu11. Dalc/Tl111e llccelve<I 1Jy/Siu11. flcll11qulslled Oy/Slu11. Di1lc!Ti111c lleceivcd Dy/Si(Jll. ---------------------------I leli11q1ti!_;l11id Uy/Siu11. 1);1lefrt111e llccclvcd Dy/'.;iu11. llell11qulsllcd Uy/Siu11. Dale/Tl111e I leceived lly/Si~J 11. --=~-=-==-=----:-7~--=--~~~==-=--==----=-----=== =============, ·.=; ---1--_-::-:::_:-··---_________ :.------.. ---.:.:.:..:·::-::--:.:=.. ...... ·::=::::=-·=::;.=:.:'..· -I teceived lor Laboratory Uy/Siu11aturc Date/fii11c '.i1'11d !i,11111'!.•:; 111: Trl,111ulc Lalioratorics, Inc. /\1111: Sa111ple Ct1'.;lodia11 nu I Capitola Drive Ou11l;1111, NC 2771:J US/\ I' II o ll c: ( !.l I 9) !i '1'1·!:i"/29 • F ii x: ( 9 l !) ) !:i '111 · !:i '19 1 -... ------··---------------==== ----------·--------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXD
GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF ON-LINE DATA
I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC
N ~ Q) m ti..:=
i.... 0 r-i....
i c..
·m ~
C :J ::: ,...,
0 CO ~ ~ ffl Q) 0 C.
.c E t Q)
oi-z
Appendix 0 : Graphical Representation of On-line Data r
I
\
\
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O> <X)
~
I
I
I ~
0 0 0 0
I'--co
0 0 0 0
LO 'V
0 LO LO ~
'V N
'V
'r-Q)
E . ·.=
LO
LO
C')
'r-
(0
N
C')
~
r--.
LO
N
'r-
<X)
N
N o~
0
C"')
Warren County Landfill -Draft Treatability Report
Page D:1 u. C) w .... :::, 0 1-u ~
C
l-o ~
I
.....
~ 0:::
I-
I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC
N 0
-Q) mti=
s..... 0 i-s....
0 a..
m w
C ffl ~ CJ e w m w 0 Q)
..c: 0
1= e
0 a... z
Appendix D: Graphical Representation Of On-line Data
J
LO T""" LO
T""" 0
( o/o) UO~lBJlU8~UO~
0 LO LO ,r-T""" N 0..0
T"""
"'-LO
N
T"""
CX)
N
N 0 T"""
Warren County Landfill -Draft Treatability Report
Page D:2
'V I
0
N
0 0
0
0
-------------------~ OJ -, -, ro ::i n 0 C ::i ....... --< ' OJ ::i CL ~ I 0 -, OJ ;::::;:---, -, ro OJ ....... OJ CT ....... --< ;;;o ro -0 0 -, ....... ' ~ 1000 ~ 900 ...._., ~ 800 ::J 1o ?oo I,,_ ~ 600 ~ 500 I-400 15:21 North Carolina -Trial 03 Temperature Profile ---..-.~~ ----15:50 16:19 16:48 17:16 17:45 18:14 Time --TRM Input --TRM Mid --TRM Drive Reactor In --Reactor Out --EGF Top 18:43 m n 0 ' 0 Cl n ),. "O "O (!) :J Q x· tJ n .... $lJ "O :J--n· $lJ -;;o (!) "O .... (!) V) (!) :J ,...,. $lJ ,...,. o· :J 0 -0 ::i _._ s· (!) tJ $lJ ,...,. PJ -0 OJ 00 ro 0 w
I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ECO LOGIC
('I)
0 Q)
cat.:::
I-0 I-I-
I a..
ca "' C ca == (..9 0 s...
ffl
()
U)
(/)
Q)
0 .c 0 t:: s... o C.. z
C\I
Appendix D: Graphical Representation Of On-line Data i {
LO ~ LO
~ 0
(%) 'UO~lBJlU8:>U08
I'-
~ (I)
E
CX) I-
v
(0
~
0
LO
LO
~
Warren County Landfi 11 -Draft T reatabi I ity Report
Page D:4
N
0
(.)
0
(.)
lJOda~ Al!l!qe1eaJ1 lJEJQ -ll!Jpue7 /41uno:J uaJJEM I Cone (ppm) Bnz I ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... I\.) I\) ,,,. O> 00 0 I\) ,,,. O> 00 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:20:10 I I, I I 10:26:12 10:32:15 } I 10:38:18 10:44:21 I 10:50:24 ! 10:56:28 ,~ I 11 :02:31 ;. 11:08:35 11 :14:39 '"~"' I . "':j-11:20:44 ----=-~ 11:26:49 I 11:32:55 11 :39:00 11:45:06 I 11:51:12 z "'tJ 11 :57:21 (") (") I fl> !:!; 0 :::r co 3 12:03:30 w 0,) (I) CD 0 ;::i ..... 12:09:39 0) ..... co ..... I 12:15:49 12:22:01 12:28:13 I 12:34:25 #" ~ \ I 12:40:37 12:46:50 I 12:53:02 12:59:14 I 13:05:26 13:11 :37 ..... -I ml ,. I I Q (1) ' 13:17:48 (") -::, i ffi ffi N i ::, ::, (1) 13:23:59 N (1) ~ i I 13:30:10 l 13:36:21 13:42:32 I -, ~ I I I I 0 ..... I\) c,.) ,,,. 0, c,.) I\) ..... Cone (ppm) Toi & 1CI I ~JYOld seo pnpOld :swr:) l66l ~unr £ z:o IB!l.L I!OS IlYPUB'J AlUilO:) U~llUfi\ I s:o a8ed -ereo auu-uo jO UO!J-ewa5aJda~ 1-e:>!Lfd-eJ~ :o X! puaddv :JIC)Ol O:J:I
"'tJ I» cc (D ..... 15:24:29 15:30:05 15:35:42 15:41:19 15:46:55 15:52:32 15:58:09 16:03:46 16:09:22 16:14:59 16:20:36 16:26:13 16:31:50 16:37:27 16:43:04 16:48:41 -f f;: 16:54:18 m 16:59:55 17:05:32 17:11:10 17:16:47 17:22:24 17:28:01 17:33:39 17:39:16 17:44:54 17:50:31 17:56:08 18:01:45 18:07:23 18:13:00 18:18:41 18:24:18 0 r I c.> u, 0 I I\,) gE]Old SBD pnpOld :swi:) ..... 0 0 I ..... lJOda~ Al!l!qereaJl lJEJO -ll!Jpue7 Aluno:) uaJJEM Cone (ppm) Bnz ..... 0, 0 I ..... I ("') ffi :::, N 0 I I\) 0 0 c1 c (D :::, (D ..... I CD (D :::, N <D :::, (D I\) u, 0 I\) c.> 0 0 c.> c.> u, 0 ""' ""' 0 0 u, z 0 0 (II 0 a, co .... Cone (ppm) Toi & 1-CI l66I gunf ~ £0 JB!ll pos ngput11 AlUilO:) ugllBJ\\. 9:0 a~ed ereo dU! f-UO JO UO!JPWd5dJdd(/ f P::l!l.JdPJ~ :o X! puddd't;! :)1~07 0:)3 I I I I I I I I I ~ I ;:i. ..... I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXE
ANALYTICAL DATA SETS FOR TREATABILITY
TEST RUNS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Input Soil -Sample Location Sl
1. PCBs
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-Sl
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S 1
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-Sl
2. PCDDs and PCDFs
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-Sl
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S 1
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S 1
-blank
....
.) . Volatile Organic Compounds
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-Sl
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S 1
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S 1
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014B
NC-Rl-S1
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLIID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
NC-PROJECT
SOIL
170-73-BB
· 0.010 kg
0.009 kg
1.1
337
3220
5730
21750
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
1
6
11
20
19
~1odified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP23600
06/06/97 Spike File: SPPCBFOl
06/16/97 !Cal: PCBY617
06/24/97 ConCal: YP229
LO % Moisture: 10.5
YP22300 % Lipid: n/a
DD % Solids: 89.5
12.9
369
3300
7560
37780
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Total HexaCB 131380 23 132150
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB .·
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
13Cir3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
DC1r2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5',6,6' -OctaCB -_
13Ctr2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
DC1i-2.2' ,5,5'-TetraCB
DC1r3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
83450
16320
717
ND
262910
281670
127
102
102
19
9
3
0.6
114
91.9
91.8
83460
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
0.82
0.95
133
0.79
129
I
I
I
Data Reviewer. _____ 71~ .... 0~-----06fl7/97
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~ I 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2TT13
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1
23.93
29.85
2535
19.90
28.33
PCIF .)'SR Yl.00. ~ 6.10.02
Printed: 13:48 06/27/97
88 (1) '-·----;.-_______ . _______ -------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
1LI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
Total DiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
42014B
NC-R2-S1
NC PROJECT
SOIL
170-73-lB
0.010 kg
0.009 kg
EMPC
543
5400
8970
23590
117790
74900
15090
654
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst
6
12
22
21
24
20
9
3
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP23400
06/06/97 Spike File: SPPCBF0l
06/16/97 !Cal: PCBY617
06/24197 ConCal: YP229
1.0 % Moisture: 11.4
YP22300 % Lipid: n/a
DD % Solids: 88.6
14.2
614
5610
10710
35940
118410
74910
DecaCB ND 0.4
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
13C1r3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
13C12-2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
13C1:-2.2' ,5,5'-TetraCB -
13C1i-3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
246940
261950
134
107
121
96.0
90.9
. ~ . . .
20%-130% 0.78 23.93
29.85 20%-130% ; · 0.94
20%-130% 129 25.35
0.79 19.90
132 2833
Dara Reviewer:-----~--------06/27/97
Page 1 of 1 PCBF .)'SR. "2.00. I..AJtS 6.10.02
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: (919} 544-5729 • Fax: [phone]
Printed: 13:46 06/27/97
J -66
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TI.J -Project: __
Client Sample:
42038B
NC-R3-S1
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
1LIID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
Total DiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
NC PROJECT
SOIL
170-97-lB
0.010 kg
0.009 kg
EMPC
265
2780
5490
19160
96210
63200
13390
601
-11.5
201100
217630
13C12-3,3',4,4'-TetraCB :·-....... _ ~-123
IV"' -2,'>',3,3'.5 5' 6 6' -Octa.CB .. _, ·,. ' . 103 -\....12 -, , , ·=-:-,,. -' ... r:..__ ....
.. --· _____ -.
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
5
10
25
20
20
19
10
3
111 -
92.8
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP23300
06/10/97 Spike File: SPPCBF0l
06/16/97 ICal: PCBY617
06/24/97 ConCal: YP229
1.0 % Moisture: 11.6
YP23100 % Lipid:
DD % Solids:
9.7
300
2910
7050
33310
96840
63210
20%-130% : ·. -_. 0.79
20%-130% i ~ ~ 0.91
,.,. ··--...... _ .. __ 1 •----·-~--
n/a
88.4
31.43
23.93
29.85
13C1r2,2' ,4,4' .5,5' -HexaCB ·_ ·. 88.6 79.7 20%-130% 130 2535 . ____ · .. ·_ -_ ----...... ----~ ---:.---:---:-.. ~~-:-=~ ~: ,~--=~·-__ ..;__,, __ -... -__ ,.
-· ' -< .-.
13Cl.T2,2' ,5,5' -TetraCB ~ :--· 'l::' ~
13C1r3,3 ',4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB-... -::~-;-
Data Reviewer. ~ if LJ fd
Triangle Laboratories, lnc.19
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1
-~ · --': 0.78
,.,, -1.31
07/06/97
19.90
28.33
POIF J'Sll vl.00. LARS 6.10.03
Printed: 11 :22 07/06/97
f) I") t.. :.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014A
NC-Rl-S1
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Analysis File:· W972247
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TL! ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1.2.3, 7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hx.CDD
1,2,3,6.7,8-Hx.CDD
1,2.3.7,8,9-Hx.CDD
1,2,3.4,6.7,8-HpCDD
1,2.3,4,6, 7 ,8,9-0CDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2.3,7,8-PeCDF
2.3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2.3,4,7,8-Hx.CDF
1,2.3,6,7,8-Hx.CDF
2.3.4,6, 7,8-HxCDF
1,2.3,7,8,9-Hx.CDF
1,2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2.3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2.3,4,6, 7,8,9-OCDF
.. ·-~ ' . . ..
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
TotalHpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total R-..:CDF
Total HpCDF
NC Project/Aberdeen Proving Gr
Soil Date Received: 06/06/97
170-73-SA Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/20/97
1.139 g
1.019 g
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
253
3640
75.1
31.4
122
1720
296
157
ND
2150
959
5700
ND
ND
EMPC
520
102
903
3330
4870
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank File: W972243
Analyst: BB
15.0
20.9
24.5
19.2
22.1
19.3
15.0
20.9
24.6
2
2 142
6 1060
8 3360
4
Page 1 of2
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 2n13
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Spike File:
!Cal:
ConCal:
SPX2371S
WF54307
W972235
% Moisture:
% Lipid :
10.50
n/a
89.50 % Solids:
1.03 32:4<5
0.83 35:22
0.74 21:34
1.36 25 :36
1.51 26:20
1.25 29:10 PR -1.32 29:16
1.21 29:4<5 PR_
1.05 31:56
1.09 33 :08
0.88 35:29
X2J7.)'SR •l.00. LARS 6.10.00
Printed: 17:21 ~:r'97
V
----
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
42014A
NC-Rl-S1
Method 8290 TCDDffCDF Analysis (DB-225)
Analysis File: X971723
NC Project/Aberdeen Proving Gr
SOIL Date Received: 06/06/97
170-73-SA Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/23/97
1.139 g
1.019 g
DB-225
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank File: W972243
Analyst: MS
Spike File:
ICal:
ConCal:
SPC2NF1S
XF24087
X971716
% Moisture: 10.5
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: 89.5
I 2,3,7,8-TCDF 32.5 0.76 23:44
I
I
I 13Cirl,2.3,4-TCDD
8100 82.6 40%-130% 0.81
0.78
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data Reviewer: ___ ___.__C/ _______ 06/23/97
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.,,
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1
23 :42
22:34
c::NF _PSR •2.00. URS 6.09.01
Printed: 22:04 f ~7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014A
NC-R2-S1
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Analysis File: W972244
Client Project
Sample Matrix:
TLIID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2.3, 7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-H pCDD
1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8,9-0CDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2.3,4.7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HxCDF
2.3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8,9-0CDF
. -
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Tot:l!HpCDF
NC Project/Aberdeen Proving Gr
Soil Date Received: 06/06/97
170-73-lA Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/20/97
1.229 g
1.089 g
DB-5
ND
60.4
82.5
84.0
83.6
546
5900
75.9
95.0
154
1070
231
188
81.8
1320
615
3020
ND
60.4
250
1650
156
595
2230
3080
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank Ftle: W972243
Analyst: BB
12.9
12.9
1
3 316
2
,. 170 j
5 962
7 2330
4
Page 1 of2
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 2n13
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Spike File:
ICal:
ConCal:
SPX2371S
WF54307
W972235
% Moisture: 11.4
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: 88.6
1.39 26:41
1.38 29:53
1.25 29:57
1.17 30:15
0.98 32:46
0.84 35:22
0.73 21:34
1.44 25:36
1.44 26:20
1.31 29:()() PR_
-1.26 29:15
1.43 29:45
1.42 30:28
1.04 31:55
1.00 33:07
0.87 35:28
lCJ7 .)'SR •'.!.00. URS 6J 0_QO
Printed: 17:26 °!)~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014A
NC-R2-S1
Method 8290 TCDDrrCDF Analysis (DB-225)
Analysis File·: X971722
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight
GC Column:
2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C1r 1,2,3,4-TCDD
NC Project/Aberdeen Proving Gr
SOIL Date Received: 06/06/97
170-73-lA Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/23/97
1.229 g
1.089 g
DB-225
44.0
6690
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank File: W972243
Analyst: MS
72.8 40%-130%
Spilce File:
ICal:
ConCal:
SPC2NF1S
XF24087
X971716
% Moisture: 11.4
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: 88.6
0.80 23:44
0.79 23:43
0.79 22:34
Data Reviewer: ___ __;_y_v _______ 06/23/97
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1 C."IF .}'SR vl.00. URS 6.09 .01
Printed: 22:03 ~4l97
U(0
I
I
I
I
TLI Project
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
I lf~!!lllll~D
I 2.3.7,8-TCDD
1.2.3,7.8-PeCDD
1.2.3,4.7.8-HxCDD
I 1.2.3.6.7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3,7,8.9-HxCDD
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-HpCDD I 1.2.3.4,6.7,8.9-0CDD
2.3.7.8-TCDF
1.2.3.7.8-PeCDF
I 2.3,4.7.8-PeCDF
1.2.3.4.7.8-HxCDF
1.2.3.6,7,8-HxCDF
I 2.3.4.6.7.8-HxCDF
1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDF
1.2.3 ,4.6. 7 ,8-HpCDF
I 1.2.3,4,7,8.9-HpCDF
1.2.3,4,6.7.8,9-0CDF
Total TCDD
I Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
I Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
I Total HpCDF
I
I
42038A
NC-R3-S1
NC Project
SOIL
170-97-lA
1.140 g
1.008 g
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
35.1
539
8.0
EMPC
8 .. -
98.1
16.7
7.3
ND
88.1
49.2
320
ND
ND
2-5
71.6
16.3
57.1
195
225
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.®
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Analysis File: T974366
Date Received: 06/10/97 Spike File: SPX2371S
Date Extracted: 06/18/97 ICal: TF53286
Date Analyzed: 06/24/97 ConCal: T974380
Dilution Factor: n/a % Moisture: 11.6
Blank File: T974365 % Lipid: n/a
Analyst: DL % Solids: 88.4
1.4
1.6
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.03 31:08
0.84 33:34
0.65 18:48
3.2 PR -1.44 24:21
1.24 27:22 PR_
133 27:29
131 28:01 B -1.8
1.04 30:16
1.06 31:30
0.91 33:40
1.4
1.6
1
2
3
6 69.9
9
4
Page 1 of2 X237_PSR vl.!Xl, l..AllS 6.10.Dl•
I 801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 2n13 ® Printed: 09:45 06/25/97
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014A
TLI Solid Blank
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Analysis File: W972243
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TI.I ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3, 7,8 -PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7.8,9-0CDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF .
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF ..
J-•.
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
TotalHxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
NC Project/Aberdeen Proving Gr
Sand Date Received: I I
06/16/97
06/20/97
TLI Blank Date Extracted:
1.025 g
n/a
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank File: W972243
Analyst: BB
222
30.0
35.0
27.4
31.5
43.1
86.2
19.1
27.4
27.5
27.8
20.8
.. . -29.9
34.1
34.0
47.2
662
222
30.0
31.0
43.1
19.1
27.4
272
39.5
Page 1 of 2
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Spike File:
!Cal:
ConCal:
SPX2371S
WF54307
W972235
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: n/a
X23'7 J'SR •2.00. LARS 6.10.llO
Printed: 17:25 06/23/97
034
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42015
Sample File: HR948
Method 8260 SOIL
Sample ID: NC-Rl-Sl
~:=1:~1:::2:1~::~~:~~=:=~=:==-=~:
Sample Wgt: 0.005 Kg Dilution Factor: 1.00 % Moisture: 10.5
l:illtt\•i■-••a:• Pentafluorobenzene IS 1 Low 5.03
Dichlorodifluoromethane U
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomechane
Chloroechane
T richlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichlorocthene
Methylene chloride
rrans-1,2-Dichloroechene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
2.2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chlorofurrn
Bromochloromethane
1,1,1-T richlorocth.ane
1,4-Dif!uorobenu:ne
Grbon-tecnchloride :
1 :1-Dichloropropene
Bcn"i.e-nc-ri·J:\t.~
1.2-Dichlorocth.ane
T richlorocthene ;.::
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dib·ro-rriomethane ·· ---
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropcne
10.11
25.10
u
u
u
u
u
u
BJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2 Low
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
3.04
5.76
5.02
1.47
1.86
1.94
3.00
3.58
1.67
2.64
. 2.09
0.85
1.24
2.33
0.91
3.73
1.17
0.92
0.51
0.98
1.66
1.12
1.90
0.89
0.83
NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit Detection Limit; Quan. Limit Quantitation Limit
IS: Internal Standud; U: Undetected; B: Pruent In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: ~timated-Above c.libration Range
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11 · --. :·
n .--:: ~-
11
11
11
11 ., ··---· -.. ~ --
---· ·-.
I Trfangle uboratories of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 2m3
. ,._:Phorie::'[phone] • Fax: [phone]
Savar v3.5 Print~\ 15:59 °2~1997
. : ... _ -c-~--·--..... --. . .
I ; ~~~'2~~~~~~~/;:· ...... ~.-... ~.,.~-; ·,;:-;;,-~_~.-i •. ,~·:.:;-.-~ .... ,_._-. ·~~~.--.=:=:---.. --.-..... -. --. -
l §§§§=i■~i~--;;~g:~li~E~-~
Project Number: 42015 . Method 8260 SOIL
Sample File: HR945 Sample ID: NC-R2-S1
:~::::~!~iilll~~!~i:
Sample Wgt.: · 0.00504 Kg Dilution Factor: 1.00 % Moisture: 11.4
1 1t.a1■111aaL-a••••••• I Pencafluorobenzene IS l 5.01
Dichlorodifluoromethane U · 0.13 11 I 0.17 11 Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomet:hane
Chlorocthane
T richlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichlorocthcne
Methylene chloride
trans-1,2-Dichlorocthene
1,1-Dichlorocthane
2,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,2-Dichlorocthene
Chloroform
Bromochloromcthanc
1, 1; 1-T richlorocthanc
1,4-Difluorobcnzene
Carbon tetrachloride
1,1-Dichloropropcnc
Benzene :;~ . ...:.:. :
1,1-Dichlorocthanc
T richlorocthcnc ··
1,2-Dichloropropanc
Dibrom"°omct:hanc ·
Bromodichloromcthanc
cis-1,3-Dichloropropcnc
u
u
u
u
u
u
1.80 BJ 3.03 c u
u
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2 5.74
21.36 4.99
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
0.17 11
0.27
0.32
0. l 5
0.23
0.19
0.08
0.11
0.21
0.08
0.33
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.17
0.12
0.20
0.09
0.09
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit Detection Limit; Quan. Limit Quantitation Limit
IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetectrd; B: Pruent In Blank; J: Esti.rnated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range
Tri.mgle Laboratories of RTP, Inc.
I. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
. Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
~-.·.:.;-.-,5: .. -_._.. .
-,~.;::r_•:,;;r,;;.,;.;;,~-;-:-• . ...::.;,;:;·:•:• ·s-:~ .. ~~~:.~•'._::-··:;:-;•·--1--;!,~,,•/r',~••••·· ..
Savar v3.5
Printed: 15:58 06/']J /1997
.,, ... : .• .,, .. ·:,. ·,._,
45
V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42111
Sample File: HR.960
Sample Wgt.: 0.0025 Kg
Pen ufluoroben:zcne
Dichlorod.ifluoromechane
Chloromechane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomech:uie
Chloroethane
T richlorofluoromeclune
1, 1-Dichloroethene
Methylene chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroechene
l, 1-Dichlorocclune
2,2-Dichloropropwe
cis-1,2-Dichloroechene
Chloroform
Bromochloromechane
1,1, 1-Trichloroechane
1,4-Difluorobcnz.cne
Carbon tetrachloride:.
1,1-Dichloropropene
Bcnzcni:· ;~~~ ... ~ > .... :.:;
1,2-Dichlorocthwe
T richlorocthcnc ·
1.2-Dioloropropwc
Dibromomechanc -··
Bromodichloromcchanc
cis-1.3-Dichloropropcnc
Dilution Factor: 1.00
IS 1 5.03
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
2.75 BJ 3.05
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2 5.76
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
Method 8260 SOLID
Sample ID: NC-R3-S1
% Moisture: 11.6
0.27 23
0.36 23
0.38 23
o.ss 23
0.70 23
0.33 23
0.52 23
23
0.41 23
0.18 23
0.26 23
0.45 23
0.19 23
0.74 23
0.24 23
0.37 23
0.22 23
0.12 23
0.25 23
0.39 23
0.27 23
0.46 23
0.22 23
0.20 23
NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit Detection Limit; Quan. Limit Quantitation Limit
IS: Intern.al St.anchrd; U: Undetttted; B: Present In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Qu.antibtion Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range
Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc.
&n Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2m3
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] (0
Savarv35
Printed: 0'):57 06/26/1997
20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Scrubber Water Pre-run -Sample Location S2-1
1. PCBs
-run I -sample NC-Rl-S2-l
-nm 2 -sample NC-R2-S2-l
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S2-l
2. PCDDs and PCDFs
-run I -sample NC-RI-S2-l
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S2-l
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S2-l
I ;+i;;,&!!P4!~~~&~--~~~lliil~E!!!!ll!)J!~l!ffl!!l!I
TLI Project: 42014D Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis I Client Sample: NC-Rl-S2-1 Analysis File: YP18700
Client Project: NC PROJECT I Sample Matrix: WATER Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 06/11/97
Date Analyzed: 06/18/97
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
PCBY617
YP170
TI.I ID: 170-73-9B ICal:
ConCal:
I Sample Size: 1.000 L Dilution Factor: 1 % Moisture: n/a
Dry Weight: n/a Blank File: YP17700 % Lipid: n/a I Analyst: DD % Solids: n/a
.~~9l-%11~~~~~)i ti<!:·lli~i~,imi\ii,~H~~
Total DiCB . -· 0.01 1
I Total TriCB ND
Total TetraCB ND
Total Penta.CB ND
Total HexaCB ND I Total HeptaCB ND
Total Octa.CB ND
Total NonaCB ND
IDecaCB -ND
TOTAL PCB 0.07 ~ / I TOTALPCB+EMPC 0.07 _j
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.005
I UCu-3.3',4,4'-TetraCB . 1.0 101 · 20%-130% . , 0.77 23.97 _
. UCu-2.2'.3.3'.5.5'.6,6'-0ctaCB 0.77 77.0 20%-130% 0.88 29.88
UCtr2.2'.5.5'-TetraCB
,oC,r3,3',4,4'.5,5'-HexaCB
0.74 74.2 20%-130% 1.31
0.79
1.34
I
I Data Reviewer: _____ 7]_._ .... J_c;.. ______ CUl4/97
Page 1 of 1
I Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] ·····--··
2538
19.93
2837
PCBI' .)'SR 1'2.00. LARS 6.10.01
Printed: 14:38 06/24/97
134
I TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014D
NC-R2-S2-1
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP18300
I Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
I TLIID:
Sample Size: I ~?'~~eight:
I
Total MonoCB
I TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
I Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
I
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
I TOTALPCB
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
NC PROJECT
WATER
170-73-2B
1.000 L
n/a
uc;,3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB I :~~~~:.~.3· .5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
~ •-.... !-'"•·· "' -;: ·-.•
0.02
0.009
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 06/11/97
Date Analyzed: 06/17/97
Dilution Factor: 1
Blank File:
Analyst:
1
1
YP17700
DD
0.003
0.004
0.006
0.006
0.005
0.006
0.006
0.008
0.03
0.03[/
0.04 ~
0.99
0.86
0.83
..• j • .,. .•.
99.0
86.0
83.4
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File:
ICal:
ConCal:
% Moisture:
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.80
0.91
131
0.77
131
SPPCBFOl
PCBY617
YP170
n/a
n/a
n/a
23 .97
29.88
25.38
19.93
2837
I
I Data Reviewer. _____ l)_J'---'-..... J-"------06/24/97
PCBF _PSR Y2.00. LARS 6.10.0 I I Page 1 of 1 ------------------Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
1801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
----· ----·--·-
G0 Printet~31 06/24/97
....
I 11t,~1~11111111r=' , ~ ·· .,__. -~~~h ·
TLI Project: 42038D Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Client Sample: NC-R3-S2-1 Analysis File: YP20600
I.---------------,
Client Project:
I Sample Matrix:
TLIID:
NC PROJECT
WATER
170-97-2B
I Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
1.000 L
n/a
I
I
I
I
I
Total MonoCB
Total DiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
I 13C;3.3' ,4,4' -Tetra.CB
~1r2.2' J.3' .5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
I
ir~~w~·,,frtit~~~i1%Wf·i . :-•.. I ~~;_,~~~~-~~'.'.'. ❖,_
llC12-2.2' .5.5' -Tetra.CB
UC1:r3,3'.4.4'.5.5'-HexaCB I
Date Received: 06/10/97
Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/20/97
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Blank File: YP22000
Analyst: DD
0.02 1
0.007 1
ND 0.003
ND 0.004
ND 0.005
ND 0.004
ND 0.004
ND 0.004
ND 0.005
ND 0.006
0.03
0.03
0.91
0.77 ~ ...
91.4
76.6
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File:
!Cal:
ConCal:
%Moisture:
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.76
0.86
SPPCBF0l
PCBY617
YP203
n/a
n/a
n/a
23.97
29.88 .
0.75 19.93
129 2837
I
I
I
I
Data Reviewer. --""--f';J_o...;_~---------07/03/97
Page 1 of 1 POIF .}'SR V2DQ. l..AltS 6.1 O.QJ
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Printed: 11 :47 07/0'3/97
65
I TLI Project: 42014C Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Client Sample: NC-Rl-S2-1 Analysis File: T974105
I Client Project: NC Project
I Sample Matrix: WATER
TIJ ID: . 170-73-9A
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 06/11/97
Date Analyzed: 06/14/97
Spike File:
!Cal:
ConCal:
SPX2372S
TF53286
T974100
I Sample Size: 1.000 L Dilution Factor: n/a % Moisture: n/a
Dry Weight: n/a Blank File: T974102 % Lipid: n/a
GC Column: DB-5 Analyst: ML % Solids: n/a
I 2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2.3. 7,8-PeCDD
1.2.3.4.7.8-HxCDD
I 1.2,3,6,7.8-HxCDD
1.2.3, 7.8.9-HxCDD
1.2,3.4.6,7,8-HpCDD I 1,2.3,4,6,7,8.9-OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1.2,3, 7,8-PeCDF
I 2,3.4.7,8-PeCDF
1.2.3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1.2,3,6. 7,8-HxCDF
I 2.3.4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1.2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF
1.2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
I 1.2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1.2.3.4,6, 7,8,9-OCDF
.. ~! -.. . ~----·
To~-TCDD
I Total PeCDD
TotalHxCDD
Total HpCDD
I Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF I Total HpCDF
I
ND 6.3
ND 8.9
ND 12.0
ND 10.9
ND 10.6
ND 14.2
ND 18.1
ND 5.1
ND 6.5
ND 6.3
ND 8.8
ND 7.0
ND 8.7
ND 9.7
ND 8.2
ND 12.8
ND 15.6
ND 6.3
ND 8.9
ND 11.1
ND 14.2
ND 5.1
ND 6.4
ND 8.4
ND 10.0
I Pagel of2
I Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~ @-
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 { ~
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I
-. •·• --.
X237 _PSR v2.00. LARS 6.10.00
Printed: 20:25 06/15/97
74
I TLI Project:
Client Sample:
I Client Project:
Sample Matrix: I TLI ID:
I Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
42014C
NC-R2-S2-1
NC Project
WATER
170-73-2A
1.000 L
n/a
DB-5
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF_Analysis (b)-
Analysis File: T974103
Date Received: 06/06/97 Spike File: SPX2372S
Date Extracted: 06/11/97 !Cal: TF53286
Date Analyzed: 06/14197 ConCal: T974100
Dilution Factor: n/a % Moisture: n/a
Blank File: T974102 % Lipid: n/a
Analyst: ML % Solids: n/a
I ltAffii1~•4Wrntr1b ll1r1i11,s;½0111iJ11&11111r,11,r•a!I11111111111111!:\\U1'■1'1&'Z4:~tL~s11 c1
I 2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
I 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1.2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD
I 2,3,7,8-TCDF
1.2,3, 7 ,8-PeCDF
I 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
I 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2.3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF
1.2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF I l~:3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF
I
I
I
I
I
·~""r~. i :· -
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
I Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I
6.9
9.6
13.5
12.3
11.9
17.2
22.3
5.8
6.9
6.7
9.6
7.7
9.6
10.6
9.2
14.4
19.2
6.9
9.6
12.5
172
5.8
6.8
9.3
11.3
Page 1 of2 X237 .)'SR vl.00. LARS 6.10.00
Printed: 20:24 06/15/97
55
I ;iiilii~ii~iiiil~~~~~~,'"~"'''.• "'~,-,.,.·:~i.i~•§e.~g~liagt'.)/'? . w· .. ,,···.·.· .. :,.~k~~::V/), ':~~!tllLW&~;
TLI Project: 42038C Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) I Client Sample: NC-R3-S2-1 Analysis File: W 972292
Client Project: NC Project
I Sample Matrix: WATER
1LI ID: 170-97-2A
Date Received: 06/10/97
Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/23/97
Spike File:
!Cal:
ConCal:
SPX2372S
WF54307
W972285
I Sample Size: 1.000 L Dilution Factor: n/a % Moisture: n/a
Dry Weight: n/a Blank File: W972287 % Lipid: n/a
GC Column: DB-5 Analyst: BB % Solids: n/a
I 1!1FJIIBll~l11■E'1ilil1lilll!il\!-■,~lllll!l!~illt,l!ElllfJ!!!I
12,3,7,8-TCDD ND 1.3.
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 2.4
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 2.8
1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 2.2
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND 2.5
1,2,3.4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 2.3
11,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDD 13.5
2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 1.0 ·
0.85 35:17 B_
1 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.7
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.7
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 1.9
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF..: ND 1.4
I 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 2.0
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF · ND 2.3 ·
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND 2.1
I ~±~:::~:~t:g -----· -:__ ·------· ---·· ;::
: r;; .. ~f~~:t~~t f-:;:_.;; .. ~~~::;: .,./~~:::~~~~--~-,.~·-·. _ .. -.:.:.-_ l
~ ···::.~ '.,;.~• ~--~_. ... ,,..~ .. : .,.-~'•-: .,, ......... -~--··••' ... • ..
TotalTCDD FMPC 3.7
I Total PeCDD ND 2.4
Total HxCDD ND 2.5
TotalHpCDD ND 2.3
I Total TCDF ND 1.0
Total PeCDF FMPC 2.0
TotalHxCDF ND 1.8
I TotalHpCDF ND 2.4
I
I Page 1 of2 X237_.PSR '200.1..ARS 6.10.01
I Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~ (ii) 801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: {919) 544-5729 • Fax: {919) 544-5491
~"8ted: 11 :27 06/24/97
I ... . -··.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Scrubber \-Vater Post -run before Carbon Filtering -Sample Location S2-2
1. PCBs
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-S2-2
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S2-2 -missing. Due August 31 , 1997
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S2-2
2. PCDDs and PCDFs
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-S2-2
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S2-2 -missing. Due August 31 , 1997
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S2-2
,..,
.) . \-Vater Blanks
-run 1 and 2
-run 2
-run 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014D
NC-Rl-S2-2
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP18500
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
1LIID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
NC PROJECT
WATER
170-73-lOB
1.000 L
n/a
0.28
0.10
EMPC
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 06/11/97
Date Analyzed: 06/18/97
Dilution Factor: 1
Blank File: YP17700
Analyst: DD
3
4
0.008
0.003
0.005
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.007
TOTAL PCB 038~ j TOTAL PCB+ EMPC 039
13C1r3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
13C1r2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
13Cir2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5'-HexaCB
13C1r2.2' ,5,5'-TetraCB
13Cir3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
1.00
0.80
0.82
99.6
79.9
82.0
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
ICal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP170
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.80
0.87
129
0.78
125
n/a
n/a
23.97
29.88
25.38
19.93
28.37
Data Reviewer: ____ /!Jv_-'--_J ______ 06/24/97
Page 1 of 1 POIF _PSR ¥200. LARS 6.10.01
Triangle Laboratories, lnc.3
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13
, Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Printed:~ 06/24/97
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014K
NC-R2-S2-2
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP503D0_
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLIID:
NC PROJECT
WATER
170-73-3B
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 08/01/97
Date Analyzed: 08/14/97
Sample Size: 1.000 L Dilution Factor: 1.0
Dry Weight: n/a Blank File: YP49400
Total MonoCB
Tota.I DiCB
Total TriCB
Tota.I TwaCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCI3
Total Hept.aCB
Tot..1.1 OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCI3
TOTAL PCB
TOT AL PCB + EMPC
13Ci:-3.3' .4.4· -TetraCB
13Ci:-2.2' ,3.3' .5,5' ,6,6' -Oct.aCB
13C1:-2.2' .4.4· ,5,5'-HexaCB
13Ci:-2.2' ,5,5'-TetraCB
"Ci:-3,3' .4.4· ,5.5'-HcxaCB
0.26
0.09
0.01
ND
0.008
0.03
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.41
0.47
0.83
0.68
0.85
Analyst: DD
2
4
2
2
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.006
83.4
68 .2
84.7
0.31
0.09
0.02
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File:
ICal:
ConCal:
SPPCBF0l
PCBY617
YP488
% Moisture: n/a
9o Lipid: n/a
9c Solids: n/a
0.77
0.88
1.27
0.78
1.28
23.52
29.53
24.93
19.50
28.02
Data Reviewer: --~"--''--_N ________ 08/22197
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1 PCBF_PSR v::.oo. LARS 6.10.03
Printed: 12:51 08/22/97
I -------------· -------·----------··-·---------· 66
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42038D
NC-R3-S2-2
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
1LIID:
::.
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
Total DiCB
NC PROJECT
WATER
170-97-3B
1.000 L
n/a
0.31
0.08
Total TriCB EMPC
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
13C1r3,3' ,4,4' -Tetra.CB
13Cir2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
13C1r2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5'-HexaCB
13C1r2.2' ,5,5' -Tetra.CB
13Cir3,3' ,4,4' .5.5'-HexaCB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.39
0.42
0.89
0.75
0.64
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP20700
Date Received: 06/10/97
Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/20/97
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Blank File: YP22000
Analyst: DD
3 0.31
4 0.10
0.01
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.005
.
88.7 --20%-130%
74.6 20%-130%
64.0 20%-130%
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
ICal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP203
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.78
0.88
1.34
0.78
1.28
n/a
n/a
23.97
29.88
2535
19.93
28.37
Data Reviewer: __ __,_,# __________ (l'l/03/97
Page 1 of 1 POIF .PSR vl.00. LJ.RS 6.10.03
I Triangle Laboratories, lnc.s
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713 /;;_ ,'\
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] \.Lj) 8 3 Printed: 11 :48 07/03/97
1 _______________ _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project: 42014C Method 8290 PCDD/PCI)F_Analysis (b)
Client Sample: NC-Rl-S2-2 Analysis File: T974106
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1.2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3. 7 .8.9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6, 7 .8-HpCDD
1,2.3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDD
2,3, 7,8-TCDF
1,2.3, 7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7.8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF
1.2,3.4.6. 7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4, 7 ,8,9-HpCDF
1.2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDF
-.
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
NC Project
WATER
170-73-l0A
1.000 L
n/a
DB-5
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.®
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 06/11/97
Date Analyzed: 06/14/97
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank File: T974102
Analyst: ML
3.6
5.3
6.9
6.3
6.1
8.7
10.5
3.1
3.7
3.6
5.5
4.4
5.5
6.1
4.7
7.4
9.1
3.6
5.3
6.4
8.7
3.1
3.6
5.3
5.8
Page 1 of2
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: (919) 544:5491
Spike File:
!Cal:
ConCal:
SPX2372S
TF53286
T974100
-% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: n/a
X:?37 _PSR v2.00. LARS 6.10.00
Printed: 20:26 06/15/97
94
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLIID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2,3,7.8-TCDD
1,2.3.7.8-PeCDD
1,2.3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2.3,6.7,8-HxCDD
1,2.3. 7 .8.9-HxCDD
1,2.3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDD
1.2.3,4,6,7.8,9-OCDD
2.3.7.8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2.3,4.7,8-PeCDF
1.2.3,4, 7,8-HxCDF
1.2.3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2.3,4,6. 7,8-HxCDF
1.2.3. 7.8,9-HxCDF
1.2.3.4.6.7,8-HpCDF
1.2.3.4. 7,8.9-HpCDF
1.2.3,4.6,7,8.9-0CDF
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
42014Lrl
NC-R2-S2-2
NC Project
WATER
170-73-3C
1.000 L
n/a
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
234
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Analysis File: U972811
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 08/15/97
Date Analyzed: 08/19/97
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank File: U972810
Analyst: BJG
3.1
6.8
9.7
7.9
8.5
12.8
2.4
4.0
4.1
5.2
4.0
5.4
6.1
7.4
10.7
22.9
3.1
6.8
8.6
12.8
2.4
4.1
5.1
8.7
Page 1 of2
Spike File:
ICal:
ConCal:
% Moisture:
% Lipid:
% Solids:
SPX2372S
UF58077
U972809
n/a
n/a
n/a
0.87 36:56
-
:>CJ7 _PSR vl.00. LARS 6.10.03
-801 Caprtola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Printed: 20:52 ~/97
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLIID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2.3, 7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8,9-OCDD
2.3, 7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2.3,4, 7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2.3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,µ,4,6,7,8,9-0CDF
........ _;;• f ~.
_Total TCDD I . Total PeCDD
"Total HxCDD
TotalHpCDD
I
I
I
I
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
TotalHxCDF
TotalHpCDF
42038C
NC-R3-S2-2
NC Project
WATER
170-97-3A
1.000 L
n/a
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EMPC
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.2
ND
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Analysis File: W972293
Date Received: 06/10/97 Spike File: SPX2372S
Date Extracted: 06/16/97 ICal: WF54307
Date Analyzed: 06/23/97 ConCal: W972285
Dilution Factor: n/a % Moisture: n/a
Blank File: W972287 % Lipid: n/a
Analyst: BB % Solids: n/a
1.3
2.5
3.1
2.4
2.8
3.5
14.7 B_
1.0
1.6
1.6
2.0
1.5
1.40 29:38 B_
2.5
2.7
3.7
4.5
--...
13
2.5
2.8
3.5
1.0
1.6
1
3.1
Page 1 of2 Xl37 .J'SR v200. LARS 6.10.01
I Triangle Laboratories, lnc.e
.801.,Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
Ph(?pe: {919) 544-5729 • Fax: [phone]
I ·:··-· ,;,·-=:-•. •;;·_ .. ·.c. • , . . . ;:-:c.:.··--·--. ~:~:-·--:-. __ .
Print~:71 :28 06/24/97
--,.,:,0 .. ~:-::.-•• ~ --:· -·~-• __ • . ,, .,. ....... ,.r.. .. -....... _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project: 42014C
Client Sample: TLI Water Blank
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Analysis File: T974102
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
1LI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3. 7,8.9-HxCDD
1,2.3,4.6. 7 ,8-HpCDD
1,2.3,4,6.7.8.9-OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF
1.2,3,4. 7 .8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF,
2.3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6, 7 .8-HpCDF
1.2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8,9-0CDF
-..,.----,···~ .
NC Project
WATER
TLI Blank
1.000 L
n/a
DB-5
•. i-....:.· .. _ ... ---•.·-, ... -... .,. _____ .. , .•.. -... -.... ----,
Total TCDD _:: ..
Total PeCDD
TotalHxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
Date Received: I I
Date Extracted: 06/11/97
Date Analyzed: 06/13/97
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank File: T974102
Analyst: ML
ND 3.0
ND 4.1
ND 5.4
ND 5.0
ND 4.8
ND 7.0
ND 8.3
ND 2.6
ND 3.2
ND 3.1
ND 4.5
ND 3.7
ND 4.5
ND 5.0
ND 4.1
ND 6.4
27.7
ND 3.0
ND 4.1
ND 5.0
ND 7.0
ND 2.6
ND 3.1
ND 4.4
ND 5.0
Page 1 of2
Triangle Laboratories, lnc.,s
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 2n13
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
(ijJ
Spike File: SPX2372S
ICal: TF53286
ConCal: T974100
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: n/a
0.84 34:20
~-PSR •~00. LARS 6.10.00
Printed: 20:23 06/15/97
33
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1:s::,;;vut: :sxc::r;;;::::;z:n<t7:+:;:::::::::::::::::;:;;xni:t:rnx:::>t@HtY-i+wz-,tnt:ttx:Qt,nrn-'@.-ri:iwiwrn:w.@ttwfr-r.n::wr-ittM'i;;;;;@a;: -rnntt n+:nrn1
TLI Project 42014Crl
Client Sample: TLI Water Blank
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Analysis File: W97223 7
Sample Size: . .,., ..
Dry .Weight<:::
GC Column:.::t,::
2,3,1,82Tcoo !.:• .;-~
1,2.3,7;8-PeCDD ' . -.. ~
1,2,3,4.7,8-HxCDD
1,2;3;6,7,8~HxCDD
1,2.3; 7,8,9~HxCDD ..
1.2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
l,2,3;'4;6, 7,8,9-0CDD
... -~ ... ,..:i •• ~..:.-;.· ~ ---
1.000 L
n/a
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND ND .
ND
10.1
Date Received:
· Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst
2.4
3.6
4.1
3.2
3.7 ..
5.0
I I
· 06/17/97 ·. ·
06/20/97
n/a
W972237
WK .....
.. '· ._. . _-. _,. -·
· Page 1 of 2
Triangle _Laboratories, Inc.®
801 .Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phon~:,_(91_9) __ 544:5(29 ~~ax: [phone]
Spike File:
!Cal:
ConCal:
.. SPX2372S
WF54307
·· W972235
% Moisture: ·
% Lipid:
n/a
n/a
n/a % Solids:
0.96
. .. _.:..:· .
35:21
Xl37.}'SI. vl.00, U1tS 6.1a.o1r
Printedn1 Q:03 06/23/97
_JJ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42038C Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
TLI Water Blank ( /u.,v,v 1i) Analysis File: W972287
Client Project: NC Project
Sample Matrix:
TLIID:
WATER Date Received:
TLI Blank Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
1.000 L Dilution Factor:
n/a Blank File:
GC Column: DB-5 Analyst:
2.3,7.8-TCDD ND 2.8
1.2.3, 7,8-PeCDD ND 4.4
1.2.3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 4.5
1.2.3.6. 7 ,8-HxCDD ND 3.5
1.2.3. 7,8.9-HxCDD ND 4.1
1,2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 4.6
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8,9-00)D 24.9
2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 2.1
1.2.3, 7.8-PeCDF ND 3.1
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 3.1
1,2,3,4. 7,8-HxO)F ND 3.5
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxO)F ND 2.7
2.3,4,6, 7,8-HxO)F 4.5
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxO)F ND 4.4
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 6.9
1,2,3,4.7,8,9-HpCDF ND 5.5
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8,9-00)F 8.0
-~.-~~_-:/~~_y .... ~:-~_-. · .. :. ~
T~f;i TCDD ND 2.8
Total PeCDD ND 4.4
Total HxO)D ND 4.0
TotalHpCDD 4.6 1
Total TO)F ND 2.1
Total PeCDF ND 3.1
Total HxCDF 4.5 1
Total HpCDF 6.9 1
Page 1 of2
· Triangle Laboratories, Inc.I',
· 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
~ Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I I Spike File: SPX2372S
06/16/97 !Cal: WF54307
06/13/97 ConCal: W972285
n/a % Moisture: n/a
W972287 % Lipid: n/a
BB % Solids: n/a
1.15 32:40
0.99 35:14
1.24 29:38
0.92 31:46
0.86 35 :22
X2J7 _.PSR '11.00. LAllS 6.10.01
Printed: 11 :24 06/24/97 2t7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Scrubber Filters -Sample Locations S3-1 and S3-2
1. PCBs -Filter 1
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-S3-1
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S3-l
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S3-1
2. PCBs -Filter 2
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-S3-2
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S3-2
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S3-2
,.,
.) . PCBs -Sample blanks
TLI,Project: 42014J
Client Sample: NC-Rl-S3-1
• ·;;_ -~· ....... '!-"
Client Project: NC PROJECT
Sample Matrix: FILTER
1LIID: 170-73-13
Sample Size: 0.030 kg
Dry Weight: n/a
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
13C12-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
13C1:-2.2' ,3.3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
uc;;2,2• ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
13Cir2.2' ,5,5' -Tet:raCB
. -UCir3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
744
671
1030
580
927
870
196
15.4
4.0
ND
5030
6200
22.0
21.6
21.9
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
3
5
10
8
19
13
12
3
1
1.5
65.9
64.7
65.6
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
06/06/97
06/20/97
06/24/97
5.0
YP22200
DD
747
1030
1150
1170
998
888
21.4
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Analysis File: YP24000
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
ICal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP229
% Moisture: 0.6
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.91
0.87
1.28
n/a
99.4
23.98
29.88
25.35
0.79 19.93
1.27 28.37
,B__
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data Reviewer. _____ '!W_-"--------06/26/97
I Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
. P~r1e:: (~19) 544-5729 • Fax: [phone] __ .. ·---.-. •:•-~ ---
1 :~~f~~:ftf~~:-j_:,-,.: -.. , .. ,
Page I of 1 PCBF ..PSR "'2.00. LARS 6.10.02
Printed: 17:03 06/26/97
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
1LIID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PenraCB
Total HexaCB
Total HepraCB
Total OcraCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
13C1r3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
42014J
NC-R2-S3-1
NC PROJECT
FILTER
170-73-6
0.030 kg
0.029 kg
1350
2530
2220
1310
1740
1640
381
22.6
ND
ND
11190
12660
13C1r2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB .
26.8
23.8
13C12-2,2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
13C,r2.2' .5.5'-TetraCB
13C1r3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
24.1
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
2
8
10
12
24
20
12
3
1.1
1.4
77.8
69.1
69.9
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP23900
06/06/97
06/20/97
06/24/97
5.0
YP22200
DD
1990
2590
2310
1860
1840
1650
385
37.0
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
ICal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP229
% Moisture: 2.0
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.84
0.91
1.28
0.79
1.28
n/a
98.0
23.97
29.87
25.37
19.92
28.35
Data Reviewer. ______ 1f___.__.._'.t) ______ 06/26/97
Triangle Laboratories, lnc.3
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
0,e~~e: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
~?_··~-:~~~-':-. ---~. -: ,:,_ · ....
Page 1 of 1 PCBP ..PSR "200. LARS 6.10.11.!
Printed: 17:47 06/26/97 108
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42038J
NC-R3-S3-1
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP24100
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
11.J ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total Hex.aCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
°C12-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
NC PROJECT
FILTER
170-97-6
0.022 kg
n/a
1370
2060
2800
1470
1850
1250
222
17.3
ND
ND
11030
15960
13C1r2.2' .3.3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB ~ "°·
28.5
. 24.9 :. :.~-=
1lC1r2.2' ,5,5'-TetraCB
UC12-3,3',4,4',5,5'-HexaCB .
·' 27.7
Date ReceillCrl: 06/10/97
Date Extr~: 06/20/97
Date Analyzd: 06/24/97
Dilution Faaor: 5.0
Blank File: YP22400
Analyst: DD
2 2020
5 3350
10 3670
8 3470
20 1930
13 1280
11
3 22.9
2.4
2.9
62.8
54.~ ;:
20%-130%
20%-130%
fi0.9 20%-130%
Drua Rev;ewer. kif, LlrJ-
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.Gt
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
P• 1 ofl
(z±)
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
ICal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP229
% Moisture: 0.7
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.79
0.79
1.40
0.80
1.34
07/06/97
n/a
99.3
23.97
29.87
25.37
19.92
28.35
POIP_PSR vl.00. l.AllS 6.10.03
Printed: 09:43 ~'f 97
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014J
NC-Rl-S3-2
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
11...IID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
Total DiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
NC PROJECT
FILTER
170-73-14
0.027kg
n/a
84.9
46.0
35.1
22.0
31.7
97.6
32.5
2.9
ND
ND
TOTAL PCB 353
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
13C1:-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
13C1r2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
13Cii-2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
. ~~ .. ..;;, .. ~
UC1r2.2' ,5,5'-TetraCB
13C1r3,3' .4.4' ,5.5' -HexaCB
424
32.5
24.4
23.7
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank Ft.le:
Analyst:
3
4
8
5
5
7
5
1
0.9
1.1
87.7
65.9
64.1
·Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP23800
06/06/97
06/20/97
06/24/97
5.0
YP22200
DD
72.5
42.8
27.2
47.4
104
41.9
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-13()'l,
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
!Cal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP229
% Moisture: 0.4
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.82
0.83
n/a
99.6
23.93
29.85
135 2535
0.78
1.28
19.90
28.33
Data Reviewer: ____ -1-w_""----------06/26/97
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
·I ™-:>f7-i {?19) 544-5729 • Fax: [phone]
Page I of I POIP .J'SR ¥200. LARS 6.10.0::
Printed: 14:56 06/26/97
J ..J 8 g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project: 42014J
Client Sample: NC-R2-S3-2
Client Project: NC PROJECT
Sample Matrix: FILTER
TI.I ID: 170-73-7
Sample Size: 0.030 kg
Dry Weight: 0.027 kg
Total MonoCB
Total DiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
13C1:-3,3' ,4,4'-TetraCB
13Ci:-2.2' .3.3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
13C1:-2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
13Ci:-2.2' ,5,5' -TetraCB " . -
13C1:-3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
228
208
114
82.5
124
436
206
27.9
ND
ND
1430
1530
30.8
22.3
242
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst
3
7
9
12
10
9
10
3
12
1.4
832
6C.l
65.2
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
06/06/97
06/20/97
06/24/97
5.0
YP22200
DD
226
123
111
159
210
32.7
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Analysis File: YP23700
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
!Cal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP229
% Moisture: 9.5
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.82
0.95
129
0.78
126
n/a
90.5
23.93
29.85
2535
19.90
28.33
a
Data Reviewer:----~--'-.....:):;....._ ______ 06(26/97
Triangle Laboratories, lnc.(8
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1 PCBF .)'SR vl.00. LARS 6.10.02
Printed: 14:55 06/26/97
•. 129
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project: 42038J
Client Sample: NC-R3-S3-2
Client Project: NC PROJECT
Sample Matrix: FILTER
TI.I ID: 170-97-7
Sample Size: 0.030 kg
Dry Weight: n/a
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total Hex.aCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOT AL PCB+ EMPC
13C1:-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
UC1r2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5',6,6' -OctaCB
UC1:-2.2' ,5.5'-TetraCB
13C1:-3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -Hex.aCB
143
86.9
46.8
48.2
76.5
366
180
26.0
ND
ND
974
1080
29.9
: 21.6
21.1
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
3
7
7
12
8
12
10
3
0.8
0.9
89 .8
64.7
63.3
Da1a Reviewer. 2l,iJJ
Page 1 of 1
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
06/10/97
06/20/97
06/24/97
5.0
YP22400
DD
146
101
66.2
61.3
118
376
188
29.0
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Analysis File: YP23500
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
!Cal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP229
% Moisture: 0.3
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.79
0.81
1.40
0.79
1.28
07/06/97
n/a
99.7
23.93
29.85
25.35
19.90
28.33
POIF_PSR •l.00. LtjlS 6.10.03
I Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713 {::_ 1'' Printed: 09:43 07/06/97
[.;
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] V 4 5 : 1 _______________ _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
-42038J
SBLK 062097
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP22400
Client Project: NC PROJECT
Sample Matrix: GSFILTER Date Received: I I
TLI ID: SBLK 062097 Date Extracted: 06/20/97
Date Analyzed: 06/23/97
Sample Size: 0.030 kg
Dry Weight: n/a
Toe.al MonoCB
Toe.al DiCB
Toe.al TriCB
Total TetraCB
Toe.al PentaCB
Toe.al HexaCB
Toe.al HepraCB
Total OctaCB
Toe.al NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOT AL PCB + EMPC
13C1:-3,3' .4.4' -TetraCB
13C1:-2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
13C1r2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
1'<:1:-2.2' ,5,5' -TetraCB
1'<:1:-3.3' ,4,4' ,5.5' -HexaCB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
n/a
n/a
29.0
263
23.6
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Blank File:
Analyst: DD
0.07
0.07
0.08
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
86.9
78.9
70.8
Dam R~ewer. Zidl
Triangle Laboratories, lnc.i&
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Pagel of l
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
ICal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP2U
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: n/a
0.77
0.88
1.28
0.79
1.30
07/06/97
23 .93
29.85
25.35
19.90
28.33
PCBF _PSR v?.00. URS 6.10.03
Printed: 09:43 07/06/97
66
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project: 42014J
Client Sample: SBLK 062097
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP22200
Client Project
Sample Matrix:
TLIID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HepraCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
NC PROJECT
GSFILTER
SBLK 062097
0.030 kg
n/a
uci:-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
13C12-2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
UC1r2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -Hex.aCB
uc1r2.2' .5.5'-TetraCB
UCi:-3,3' ,4,4' .5.5'-HexaCB
ND
ND
0.20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.20
0.20
33.0
29.7
26.3
Date Received: I I
Date Extracted: 06/20/97
Date Analyzed: 06/23/97
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Blank File:
Analyst: DD
0.06
1
0.06
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
99.1
89.1
79.0
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
!Cal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP212
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.78
0.91
130
0.76
1.27
n/a
n/a
23.93
29.85
2535
19.90
2833
Data Reviewer: ----~~_J _______ 06/26/97
Page 1 of 1 POIF ..PSR v2.00. LARS 6.10.0Z
I Triangle Laboratories, lnc.18
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
. Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Printed: 15:13 06/26/97 150
I ·-·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Scrubber \Vater Post Run after Carbon Filtering -Sample Location S4
1. PCBs
-run 1-sample NC-Rl-S4
-run 2-sample NC-R2-S4
-run 3-sample NC-R3-S4
2. PCDDs and PCDFs
-run 1-sample NC-Rl-S4
-run 2-sample NC-R2-S4
-run 3-sample NC-R3-S4
... .,_ Sample Blanks
-TLI water blank
-SBLK06 l 697
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014D
NC-Rl-S4
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP18600
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TI.I ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
NC PROJECT
WATER
170-73-llB
1.000 L
n/a
13C1r3,3' .4.4' -TetraCB
13C1r2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5',6,6' -OctaCB
13C12·2.2' .4.4' ,5,5' -Hex.aCB
13C1r2.2' ,5,5' -TetraCB
13C1r3,3' .4.4' ,5,5'-Hex.aCB
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 06/11197
Date Analyzed: 06/18/97
Dilution Factor: 1
Blank File: YP17700
Analyst: DD
ND 0.003
ND 0.003
ND 0.003
ND 0.004
ND 0.006
ND 0.006
ND 0.005
ND 0.006
ND 0.006
ND 0.008
n/a1 J n/a
0.88
0.79
0.79
88.4
79.1
78.9
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
ICal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP170
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.76
0.87
133
0.80
1.29
n/a
n/a
23.97
29.88
25.38
19.93
2837
Data Reviewer: _____ :7J_..__.;)....._ _____ 06/24/97
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1 PCIF_PSR Y2.00.1..ARS 6.10.01
Printed: 08:35 06/24/97
116
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/iIM!:%
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
Client Projecr:
Sample Matrix:
TLI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HepraCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
13C1:r3,3 ',4,4' -Tetra CB
... J:::::':;::;: ::=::r :: .,, .. ·: !i~t:~::::= D ~@¥'\;:;.·"":½¥:~J.~ .f:L•x.: :;:::,=nL rtnj
42014D Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
NC-R2-S4 Analysis File: YP18400
NC PROJECT
WATER
170-73-4B
1.000 L
n/a
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 06/11/97
Date Analyzed: 06/18/97
Dilution Factor: 1
Blank Ftle: YP17700
Analyst DD
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.002
ND 0.003
ND 0.005
ND 0.005
ND 0.004
ND 0.005
ND 0.006
ND 0.007
n/a i/ n/a ~ ,
Spike File: SPPCBFOl
ICal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP170
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: n/a
. 13C1:r2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
0.98
0.76
97.7
76.1
20%-130%
20%-130%
0.78
0.86
23.97
29.88
0.78 77.9 20%-130% 129 2538
: ·: UC1:r2.2' ,5,5' -TetraCB 0.77 19.93
· ..... 13C1:r3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB 130 28.37
Data Reviewer. ----"Tl--=-"-...,..c:)c..-_____ 06/24/97
Page 1 of 1 PCBP ..PSR "2.00. LARS 6.10.01
I :~_ Triangle Laboratories, lnc.qp
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
:~t p~!1!\~:9)_ 544-5729 • Fax: (919} 544-5491
Printed: 08:32 06/24/97
I ·"'>':. ·::;,,=.-:....:.:-.-.• -_-··-, .. ri,~---..----···. ,.,,_ . ~ .... ~ ~--_ .. ;. ·-·-~~~-... -·: ..
80
V
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project-
Client Sample:
42038D
NC-R3-S4
Client Project
Sample Matrix:
TI..,IID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight
Total MonoCB
Total DiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
NC PROJECT
WATER
17G-97-4B
.. -1.000 L
n/a
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
13C1:-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
UCi:-2.2' .3.3' .5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
13C1:r2.2' ,4,4' .5,5' -HexaCB
13C1:r2.2' .5.5'-TetraCB
13C1:r3,3' .4.4' .5.5'-Hex.aCB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
n/a
n/a
093
0.78
0.63
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP20800
Date Received: 06110/97
Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/20/97
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Blank Fi.le: YP22000
Analyst: DD
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.005
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.006
93.4
78.3
62.9
W'l>--130%
W'l>--130%
20'>-130%
Spike File: SPPCBRn
!Cal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP203
% Moisture, n/a
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.79
0.88
1.32
n/a
n/a
23.97
29.88
25.35
0.79 19.93
1.28 28.37
Data Reviewer:-----'~::.---~--------07/03/97
Page 1 of 1 POIF J'SR 'fUXl. LlltS 6.10.03
Triangle laboratories, lnc..e
801 Capitola Drive• Durham. North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Printed: 11 :49 CJl/03/97
102
V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLIID: •
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2,3,7.8-TCDD
1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD
1.2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1.2,3.7.8.9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6. 7,8-HpCDD
1,2.3,4,6.7,8,9-OCDD
2,3.7,8-TCDF
1.2,3, 7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4, 7.8-PeCDF
1.2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF
1.2,3.6,7,8-HxCDF
2.3,4,6, 7.8 -HxCDF
1,2,3, 7.8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2.3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDF
.. -..
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
42014C
NC-Rl-S4
NC Project
WATER
170-73-llA
1.000 L
n/a
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EMPC
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EMPC
ND
Method 8290 PCDD/PCPF_Analysis (b)
Analysis File: T974118
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
2.6
4.2
5.2
4.8
4.6
8.4
14.2
2.0
3.0
2.9
3.7
3.0
4.1
4.4
6.8
122
2.6
42
4.8
8.4
2.0
2.9
5.4
06/06/97
06/11197
06/14/97
n/a
T974102
BB
5.5
5.5
Page 1 of2
Spike File: SPX2372S
!Cal: TF53286
ConCal: T974113
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: n/a
X237_PSR v2.00. LARS 6.10.00
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2TT13 <: ~-
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] ® rtrcs 14:17 06/16/97
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t ·:
TLI Proje~t:
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight
GC Column:
2.3.7,8-TCDD
1.2.3.7.8-PeCDD
1.2,3.4,7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3.6,7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1.2.3,4,6,7.8-HpCDD
1,2.3,4,6,7,8.9-0CDD
2.3,7,8-TCDF
1.2,3.7,8-PeCDF
2.3.4.7.8-PeCDF
1.2.3.4.7,8-HxCDF
1.2.3 ,6, 7,8-HxCDF
2.3.4.6,7,8-HxCDF
1.2.3. 7 .8,9-HxCDF
1.2.3.4.6.7,8-HpCDF
1.2.3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1.2.3.4.6,7,8,9-0CDF
··:·'-~ ·-.:. ---
Total TCDD .
Total PeCDD
I Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
I ' Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
I
I
I
42014Crl
NC-R2-S4
NC Project
WATER
170-73-4B
1.000 L
n/a
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EMPC
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. 4.1
ND
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.®
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Analysis File: W972241
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 06/17 /97
Date Analyzed: 06/20/97
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank File: W972237
Analyst: BB
3.6
5.0
5.6
4.4
5.0
5.9
6.3
2.8
3.5
3.5
3.6
2.7
4.4
4.0
5.5
6.0
3.6
5.0
5.0
5.9
2.8
3.5
4.6
Page 1 of 2
Spike File:
ICal:
ConCal:
SPX2372S
WF54307
W972235
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: n/a
-B
1.22 29:45 B_
X237J'SR ,2.00. LARS 6.10.Dlf
I 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Printed: 10:04 06/23/97
: .. 50 . •·· -. ·-·---. .-,
., -.. -.··-... -. ~ -----~--' ' -·-----·---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TI.I ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2.3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8,9-0CDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4, 7 ,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDF .
'. ~~;'/.::i:f~~--·.:--.-.. -· -· . __
~ -:~-
TotalTCDD
TotalPeCDD
TotalHxCDD
TotalHpCDD
. Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
42038C
NC-R3-S4
NC Project
WATER
170-97-4A
1.000 L
n/a
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.7
ND
I Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
V Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
. Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
1.1
2.0
2.4
1.9
2.2
2.2
3.3
0.9
1.4
1.4
1.6
1.2
2.0
1.9
2.7
2.5
1
1
2.0
2.1
2.2
0.9
1.4
2.2
06/10/97
06/16/97
06/24/97
n/a
W972287
JM
3.4
Page 1 of2
Analysis File: W972294
Spike File: SPX2372S
!Cal: WF54307
ConCal: W972285
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid: n/a
% Solids: n/a
1.11 29:39 B_
lC37 J'SR vl.00. URS 6.10.0 I
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 I :" -Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Printed: 11 :29 06/24/97
89
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project: 42014Cr1 Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis .(b).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
1LI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight
GC Column:
2.3,7.8-TCDD
1,2.3.7,8-PeCDD
1.2.3,4.7,8-HxCDD
1,2.3,6.7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3. 7.8,9-HxCDD
1,2.3,4.6.7,8-HpCDD
1.2.3.4.6.7,8.9-0CDD
2,3.7.8-TCDF
1.2.3.7.8-PeCDF
2.3,4,7.8-PeCDF
1.2.3 .4. 7,8-HxCDF
1.2.3 .6. 7.8-HxCDF
2.3 .4.6. 7 ,8-HxCDF
1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDF
1.2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1.2.3,4,7.8.9-HpCDF
1,2,3.4,6,7,8.9-0CDF
-··· ..
,; ·:~--~;;~"{:::.._ ~:: '.:-·-~': ... :.· .. ...... -·
,. ,. .... -...
Total TCDD -· -
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
.. Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
TLI Water Blank
NC Project
WATER
TLI Blank
1.000 L
n/a
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
EMPC
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.6
ND
Date Received: / /
Date Extracted: 06/17 /97
Date Analyzed: 06/20/97
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank File: W972237
Analyst: WK
2.4
3.6
4.1
3.2
3.7
5.0
1.8
2.4
2.4
3.0
2.3 ~:
3.7
33
4.6
5.6
. -
2.1
3.6
3.6
5.0
1.8
2.4
3.9
Analysis File: W972237
------. -·
Spike File:
ICal:
ConCal:
% Moisture:
% Lipid:
% Solids:
SPX2372S
WF54307
W972235
n/a
n/a
n/a
0.96 35:21
· 1.12 29:45
I Page 1 of 2 X137.J>SR .2.00. I...AllS 6.10.01, '"-------------------------------------. Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
I f. 801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
:· ~,~one: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42038D
SBLK 061697 ( l} J Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP22000
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TI.I ID:
NC PROJECT
HPLCH2O
SBLK 061697
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
1.000 L
n/a
Total MonoCB
Total DiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HepcaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
13C1:-3,3 · ,4,4' -Tetra CB
13C1r2.2' .3.3' ,5,5',6,6' -OctaCB
13C1r2.2' .4.4' .5,5' -HexaCB
13C12-2.2' .5.5'-TetraCB 13C1r3,3' .4.4' .5,5' -HexaCB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
n/a
n/a
0.99
0.86
0.73
Date Received: I I
Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/23/97
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Blank Fl.le:
Analyst: DD
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.004
98.9
85.8
73.5
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
!Cal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP212
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.78
0.87
1.28
n/a
n/a
23.93
29.85
25.35
0.78 19.90
1.33 28.33
Data Reviewer.---~__._-""'-.__ ______ 07/03/97
Triangle Laboratories, lnc,3
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 2n13
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1 PCBP .)'Sil Y200. LARS 6.I0DJ
Printed: 12:24 07/0'3/97
120
I
I Output Soil and Soil Leachate-Sample Location SS
I 1. PeBs in soil
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-S5
I
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S5
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S5
I 2. PeDDs and PeDFs in soil
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-S5
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S5
I -run 3 -sample NC-R3-S5
" VOes in soil J .
I -run 1 -sample NC-Rl-S5
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S5
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S5
I 4. VOes in leachate
I
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-S5
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S5
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S5
I 5. Semivolatiles in leachate
-run 1 -sample NC-R 1-SS
I -run 2 -sample NC-R2-S5
-run 3 -sample NC-R3-S5
I 6. Pesticides in leachate
-run 1 -sample NC-Rl-S5
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S5
I -run 3 -sample NC-R3-S5
7. Metals in leachate
I -run 1 -sample NC-Rl-S5
-run 2 -sample NC-R2-S5
I -run 3 -sample NC-R3-S5
8. Sample blanks
I
I
I ~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project: 42014B Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Client Sample: NC-Rl-S5 Analysis File: YP22500
Client Project: NC PROJECT
Sample Matrix: SOIL
TLI ID: 170-73-UB
Sample Size: 0.010 kg
Dry Weight: n/a
,: ~-" -.
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
13C1r 3,3 • ,4,4 • -TetraCB
13C1:-2.2' .3..3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
13Cir2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
13C1r2.2' ,5,5' -TetraCB
13C1r3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
n/a
n/a
80.0
77.8
68.5
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
0.2
0.1
03
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
80.0
77.8
68.5
06/06/97
06/16/97
06/23/97
1.0
YP22300
DD
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
ICal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP2U
% Moisture: 0.0
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.80
0.87
131
n/a
100.0
23.93
29.85
2535
0.81 19.90
1.29 2833
Data Reviewer. ____ J]_-+-___ i) ______ CX5/27/97
Page 1 of 1 PCBF .)'Sil Yl.00. URS 6.10.02
Triangle Laboratories, lnc.i&
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Printed: 13:19 rz~7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project: 42014An /:£?~ Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Client Sample: NC-Rl-S5
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2.3.7.8-TCDD
1,2.3,7,8-PeCDD
1.23,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,23,6,7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3.7,8,9-HxCDD
1.23,4.6.7,8-HpCDD
1.2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDD
2.3.7,8-TCDF
1.2.3.7,8-PeCDF
2.3.4,7,8-PeCDF
1.2.3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1.2.3.6,7,8-HxCDF
2.3.4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1.2.3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1.2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1.2.3.4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1.2.3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDF
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
NC Project
SOIL
179-25-1
10.016 g
n/a
DB-5
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.®
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.63
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.63
ND
Ir# ,4-i, '/S/3
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
Page 1 of 2
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Analysis File: S975251
06/06/97 Spike File: SPX2372S
08/16/97 ICal: SF56117
08/21/97 ConCal: S975245
n/a % Moisture: 0.0
S975246 % Lipid: n/a
ML % Solids: 100.0
0.79 35:03 B_
1.42 29:32
JCJ7_PSR vl.00.1.AR.S 6.JO.0l
Printed: 12:43 08/21 /97
54
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1:: ?:~ :: ' ::: ::: : ''': : '''.:':':';:':::::::'.'? ::: :::: :'?: : :::: ?:::::,:'.;ti:;%Z:~';:=~::=::::: ;>".'~:~:'.':, ~':': ~~~: : : :: ~ ' '':' , , "' , ::s;:: ': = : Z\::}::: :~: td}:@nrn;::::,:n :JJ t 1
TLI Project: 42014B Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Client Sample: NC-R2-S5 Analysis File: YP22700
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLI ID:
NC PROJECT
SOIL
170-73-SB
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
Total DiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
TotalNonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC
0.010 kg
n/a
13C1r3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
13C1r2.2' .3.3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
13C1r2.2' ,5,5' -TetraCB
UC,i-3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
n/a
n/a
92.7 .
903
. ~ ~ . --....... . ._. --.-_ .. ___ -"~· ~-·
74.4
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
0.2
0.2
02
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
92.7
90.3
. . . -. .. -. -~ -----
74.4
06/06/97
06/16/97
06/23/97
1.0
YP22300
DD
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
!Cal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP212
% Moisture: 0.0
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.79
0.90
130
n/a
100.0
23.93
29 .85
2535
0.79 19.90
130 2833
Dara Reviewer. _____ w ...... / ______ 06/17/97
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.<&
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carofina 2n13
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1 PCBF J'SR "1.00. UR.S 6.10.02
Printed: 13:20 06/27/97
110
v
------------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42038B
NC-R3-S5
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
1LI ID:·
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
TotalDiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
NC PROJECT
SOIL
170-97-SB
0.010 kg
n/a
TOTAL PCB+ EMPC :
-.1-·
11<:1;-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
13Cu-2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
... -..
UCIT2,2' ,4.4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
·-· ··--------·-----------··----
13C1:-2.2' ,5,5'-TetraCB
'3C1:-3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
n/a
n/a
93.6
89.7
69.8
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
93.6
89.7
69.8
Da!a Reviewer. ~I/ JaJ:
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.<&
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of 1
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis.
06/10/97
06/16197
06/24/97
1.0
YP23100
DD
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
(g)
Analysis File: YP23200
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
!Cal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP?-29
% Moisture: 100.0
% Lipid:
% Solids:
--.. · .. 0.80
0.88
1.35
n/a
0.0
· 23.93
29.85
-· 25.35
0.76 19.90
129 28.33
07/06/97
PCBP ...,PSR ¥200. LARS 6.10.03
Printed: 11 :02 07/06/97
44
v
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42038An //~PG~
NC-R3-S5 /-?7vfl Lt5 u
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (l
Analysis File: S97525
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
1LI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3.4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2.3, 7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2.3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD
2.3.7,8-TCDF
1.2.3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF
1,2.3.4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1.2,3,7,8.9-HxCDF
1.2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDF
1.2.3,4.7,8.9-HpCDF
1.2.3.4.6.7 ,8,9-0CDF
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Tot.'.!.l HxCDF
Total HpCDF
NC Project
Soil
170-97-SA
10.011 g
n/a
DB-5
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.52
7.4
0.55
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.61
ND
ND
ND
2.3
ND
ND
ND
1.0
0.55
ND
0.61
ND
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank File:
Analyst:
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
2
1
0.3
0.3
Page 1 of2
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
06/10/97 Spike File: SPX2372S
08/16/97 ICal: SF56117
08/2JJ97 ConCal: S975245
n/a % Moisture: 0.0
S975246 % Lipid: n/a
ML % Solids: 100.0
1.16 32:31
0.82 35:02 B
0.85 21 :11
1.07 29:31
0.94 35:09
X1J7 ..PSR vZ.00. LARS 6.10.0lr
Printed: 11 :56 08/21 /97
49
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project: 42014A
NC-Rl-S5
ti Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF _Analysis (b)
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2.3.7.8-TCDD
1.2.3.7,8-PeCDD
1.2.3.4. 7.8-HxCDD
1.2.3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1.2.3.7,8.9-HxCDD
1,2..3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDD
1.2.3.4,6. 7,8,9-OCDD
2.3.7,8-TCDF
1.2.3.7,8-PeCDF
2.3.4.7.8-PeCDF
1.2.3.4,7.8-HxCDF
1.2.3,6,7.8-HxCDF
2.3.4.6, 7,8-HxCDF
1.2.3, 7,8.9-HxCDF
1.2.3.4.6,7,8-HpCDF
1.2.3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1.2.3,4,6. 7 ,8.9-0CDF
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
Total HxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
NC Project/Aberdeen Proving Gr
Soil Date Received: 06/06/97
170-73-12A Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: · 06/20/97
1.008 g
n/a
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EMPC
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EMPC
ND
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank Fi.le: W972243
Analyst: BB
15.0
20.4
24.7
19.4
22.2
24.4
33.1
11.8
17.5
17.5
18.2
13.6
13.8
22.4
20.0
Tl.7
25.5
15.0
20.4
21.9
24.4
11.8
17.5
13.8
23.2
Page 1 of2
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.<&
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 2n13
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
~-
Analysis File: W972248
Spike File:
!Cal:
ConCal:
% Moisture:
% Lipid:
% Solids:
SPX2371S
WF54307
W972235
0.0
n/a
100.0
X2J7.)'SR •:.00. LARS 6.10.00
Printed: 17:31 06/23/97
137
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014A -.
NC-R2-S5
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF .Analysis (b)
Analysis File: W972245
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TLI ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2.3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD
2.3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3.4, 7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3, 7 ,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8,9-0CDF
Total TCDD
Total PeCDD
TotalHxCDD
Total HpCDD
Total TCDF
Total PeCDF
Total HxCDF
Total HpCDF
NC Project/Aberdeen Proving Gr
Soil Date Received: 06/06/97
170-73-SA Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/20/97
1.004·g
n/a
DB-5
38.8
182
182
177
196
166
367
ND
EMPC
189
206
213
228
185
250
187
264
38.8
182
555
166
EMPC
189
832
437
Dilution Factor: n/a
Blank File: W972243
Analyst BB
18.8
202
1
1
3
1
34.6
1 391
4
2
Page 1 of2
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.<&
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 2n13
Phone: {919) 544-5729 • Fax: {919} 544-5491
Spike File:
!Cal:
ConCal:
SPX2371S
WF54307
W972235
% Moisture:
% Lipid:
0.0
n/a
100.0 % Solids:
0.77
1.53
1.39
1.35
1.34
1.02
0.83
1.40
1.32
1.23
1.37
1.06
1.03
0.91
0.93
22:18
26:42
29:53
29:57
30:15
32:46
35:20
26:20
29:09
29:16
29:45
30:28
31:55
33:07
35:28
xm ...PSR Yl.OO. LARS 6.10.00
Printed: 17:28 06/2'3/97
083
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matrix:
TI.I ID:
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
GC Column:
2.3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD
1.2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1.2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1.2.3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDD
1.2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD
2.3,7,8-TCDF
1,2.3, 7,8-PeCDF
2.3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1.2.3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1.2.3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2.3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1.2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1.2.3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF
42038A
NC-R3-S5
NC Project
SOIL
170-97-SA
1.000 g
n/a
DB-5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDF ___ ND
--...... --.. -.··.
Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b)
Analysis File: S973812
Date Received: 06/10/97 Spike File: SPX2371S
Date Extracted: 06/18/97 !Cal: SF56117
Date Analyzed: 06/24197 ConCal: S973801
Dilution Factor: n/a % Moisture: 0.0
Blank Ftle: T974365 % Lipid: n/a
Analyst BJG % Solids: 100.0
31.9
442
55.5
46.7
48.5
673
995
23.9
34.3
341
433
33.-4
422
47.b
52.7
68..6
73.7
I 1i~i!fu1::I1i~:::~1::;~ilr~'.i:1~::i:::f:1llii:1]:1
\:1111ilim1i~iilitl1~~i1111m11:111l!::::-~1~11tr!Rs:1:11:01i11,1111itllt■ii11rt1\11~•~1im!iI:1:::
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Total TCDD ND
TotalPeCDD ND
TotalHxCDD ND
Total HpCDD ND
Total TCDF ND
Total PeCDF ND
Total HxCDF ND
Total HpCDF ND
Triangle Laboratories, lnc.i&
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
31.9
442
49.9
67.3
23.9
34.3
41.0
59.6
~lof2 X237 _J'SR "200. URS 6.10.00
Printed: 23:42·06/24/97
89
v
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42015
Sample File: HR943
Sample Wgt.: 0.00505 Kg Dilution Factor: 1.00
Method 8260 SOIL
Sample ID: NC-Rl-S5
% Moisture: 0.0
Bllfii,i&iiiiiiil&aliaat1•~•
Pentafluorobenzene IS 1 S.03
Dichlorodifluoromethane U 0.10 1 O
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
T richlorofluoromethane
1, 1-Dichloroethene
Methylene chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethane
2.2-D ichlorop ro pane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Bromochloromethane
1, 1, 1-T richloroethane
1,4-Difluorobcnzene
Carbon tetnchloride
1. 1-Dichloropropene
Benzene :.'· .,
1.2-Dichloroethane
T richloroethene
1.2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomethane
Bromodic:hloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
u
u
u
u
u
u
1.62 BJ 3.02
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2 S.76
23.79 s.oo
u
0.23 J 5.23
u
u
u
u
u
u
0.13 10
0.13
0.20
0.24
0.11
0.18
0.14
0.06
0.08
0.16
0.06
0.25
0.08
0.07
0.08
0.13
0.09
0.1S
0.07
0.07
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10 _
10
10
-10
10
10
NA-Not Appliable; Det. Limit Detection Limit; Qua. Limit Quantitation Limit
IS: Inte=l Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Quaatitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range
I Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc.
·: 801 Capitola Drive • Durham,. North Carolina 2m3
-.~,-~ [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Savarv3.5
Printed: 15:58 06/V /1997
.·;..:-.~-.~~~--T'·----1 :~" /T~?.~ --
32 ..•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42015
Sample File: HR947
Sample Wgt.: 0.00501 Kg Dilution Factor: 1.00
Method 8260 SOIL
Sample ID: NC-R2-S5
% Moisture: 0.0
1,-J!-lliiillillilllllllll■llill
Penc.afluorobenzene IS 1 Low 5.03
Dichlorodifluoromechwc: U
Chloromc:chanc:
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomc:thanc:
Chlo roe thane:
T richlorofluoromechane
1, 1-Dichloroechc:nc:
Mc:chylc:nc: chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroechene
1, 1-Dichloroechanc:
2,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,2-Dichloroechc:ne
Chloroform
Bromochloromechanc:
1, 1, 1-T richloroechane
1,4-Difluorobenzene
Carbon tc:cnchloride
1, 1-Dichloropropenc:
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroechanc:
T richloroechc:ne
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromomechanc:
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropenc:
u
u
u
u
u
u
11.21 B
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2 Low
18.38
u
6.69 J
u
u
u
u
u
u
3.04
5.76
5.00
5.24
0.60
0.76
0.79
1.22
1.46
0.68
1.08
0.86
0.35
0.51
0.95
0.37
1.52
0.48
0.37
0.39
0.66
0.45
0.76
0.36
0.33
NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit Detection Limit; Qu.In. Limit Quantitation Limit
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10·
10
10 ·
10
IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: P~ent In Bl.Ink; J: Estimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E= Estimated-Abowe~ibration Range
Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitola Drive• Durham,. North Carolina 2m3
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Savarv3.S
hinted: 16:20 06/V /1997
56
V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample Wgt.: 0.00251 Kg
Pcnufluorobcnzcne
Dichlorodifluoromechwe
Chl~romechwe · -·
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomechwe
Chloroechwe
T richlorofluorometlune
· 1: 1-Dichloroechene
Methylene: chloride
"'tr2ns-l .2-Dichloroahc:nc:
· J ,1-Dichloroc:tlunc:
··2.2-Dichloropropanc:
-cis-1.2-Dichloroethc:nc:
:-Chloroform
-Brom~oromc:th:mc:
'.1 ;1 ;1-Trichloroc:tlunc:,
.. 11 ;~Difluorobcnzcnc: ---:.·
·:;-,.:_::i._:! ,:_~_i_i·: •.J-'\~ -· \.,:UU()n =uonac . _ . __ _
;:-1;1.;Dichl~~p~~/-~-
~ .. lk~-J!~~~r£f;r!l•~~-~.
:·1 ~Dichloroctlune .
-T richloroethcnc -_-
.:1 J~Dichl~ropropanc:
'Dibromomedunc ..,=-.::
·-:, Bro;;_~dtloromc:thwc:
~ cis-13-Dichloropropcnc:
Dilution Factor:
IS l Low
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
5.33 BJ
u
u
u
u
u
u
u --
IS 2
u
u
6.14 J
1J
u
u
u
u
u
1.00
5.04
3.06
5.77
5.28
Method 8260 SOLID
Sample ID: NC-R3-S5
% Moisture: 0.0
0.62 20
0.83 20
0.86 20
1.26 20
1.62 20
0.76 20
1.20 20
20
0.95 20
0.40 20
0.59 20
1.04 20
0.43 20
1.69 20
0.54 20 ..
0.74 20
0.43 20
20
0.49 20
0.77 20
0.53 20
0.92 20
0.43 20
0.40 20
NA-Not Applicable; Det. Llmit Dttection Limit; Quan. Limit Qu.mtitation Limit
IS: Intenw Standud; U: Undrittted; B: Pre&ent In Bl=k; J: utimated-Below Q=titation Limit; E: Eatimated-Above Calibration Range
Triangle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 2m3
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Savarv35
Printed: 09:57 06/2£,/19<71
29
I ~llllllll■l■•llll-111,lllllllJl■■lllllrll
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42014H
Sample File: FV478
Sample Vol.: 0.005 L Dilution Factor: 1.00
Method 8240 LEA CHA TE
Sample ID: NC-Rl-S5
11•1111a111r111.-,111ll!i111••
Bromochloromethane IS 1 4.84
Vinyl Chloride
1, 1-Dichloroc:thene
Chloroform
1.2-Dichloroc:tlune
1,4-Difluorobenzene
2-Bucanone
Carbon tetnchloride
Benzene
T richloroc:thene
Chlorobenzene-d 5
T et~loroethene
Chlorobenz.c:ne
1,2-Dichloroetlune-d " Toluene-cl a
4-Bromofluorobenu:ne
R.cviewedby ___ ~ __ ::t}-_____ _
0.33
0.35
0.30
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
u
u
u
IS 3
u
u
Date :l_t _$._fr. 7
6.05
10.33
5.47
7.98
12.63
0.22
0.30
0.09
0.09
2.93
0.11
0.06
0.17
0.17
0.08
1
3
3
NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit Detection Limit; Quan. Limit Qu.antitation Limit
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
132
140
120
IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Eatimattd-Below QUMttitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above ~ibration R.utge
Tri.angle Liboratories of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitola Drive• Durham. North Carolina 2m3
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Savarv3.5
Printed: 09:41 07 /r:13/1997
.J 23
C.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42014H
Sample File: FV477
Sample Vol.:
Bromochloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
1,1-Oichlorocchene
Chloroform
1,2-Oichlorocthane
1,4-Oifluorobcnzene
2-Buunone
urbon tc:trachloride
Benzene
T richlorocthene
Chlorobcnzene-d ~
T ctrachlorocchene
Chlorobcnzene
1,2-Oichlorocthane-d " T olu.cne-d ; · · · •
0.005 L
4-Bromofluorobcnzenc
. . . .. -··-----------·
~cwcd by ___ _..../;P'--__ ~---
Dilution Factor:
1.10
032
033
0.29
IS 1
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
J
u
u
IS 3
u
u
1.00
4.84
6.05
5.25
10.33
5.47
7.98
12.63
Method 8240 LEA CHA TE
Sample ID: NC-R2-S5
. -
......
0.22
0.29
0.09
0.09
3.07
0.06
0.18
0.18
0.08
1
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
128
132
116
NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit Detection Limit; Quan. Limit Qu.antitation Limit
IS: Internal Stand.ud; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: EstUNted-Below Qu.rntitation Limit; E: Estiauted-Above ~ibration lunge
Trungle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitola Drive• Durham. North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Savarv3.5
Printed: 09:41 07 /fJ!J/1997
27
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42038H
Sample F~le: FV476
Sample Vol.:
Bromochloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Difluorobenzene
2-Butanone
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
T richloroethene
Chlorobenzene-d ~
T etrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
~"ffl:;,;.
I
1,2-Dichloroethane-d 4
T olucne-d .: . .
0.005 L
4-Bromofluorobenzcne
Revic:wcd by __ ~ __ M ___ _
Dilution Factor:
0.31
0.31
0.27
IS 1
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
u
u
u
IS 3
u
u
LOO
4.84
6.05
10.32
5.47
7.98
12.63
Method 8240 LEACHATE
Sample ID: NC-R3-S5
0.21
0.28
0.08
0.08
2.91
0.11
0.06
0.17
0.17
0.07
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
124
124
108
NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit
IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Pre&ent In Blank; J: Eatumted-Below Quantitation Limit; E: F.atimated-Above ~ibration ~ge
Tri.angle Laboratoriu of R.TP, Ine.
801 Capitola Drive • Durham,. North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Savarv3.5
Printed: 17:21 07 /rJ!,/1997 20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42014F
Samole File: VF756 ...
1,4--Dichlorobcnzcnc-d ' Pyridine
1,4--Dichlorobcnzcnc
2-Mcchylphcnol
3/ 4--Mcchylphc:nol
H cxu.h.lo rocclunc
Na.ohth:..!cnc-d
' ' Niuobcnu:nc
Hc:u.h.lorobuudicnc
Ac.::m.phchc:nc-d 10
2,4,6-T richlorophc:nol
2.4,5-T richlorophcnol
2,4--Diniuocoluc:.nc:
Phc:n:.nc.hr-.Jlc:-d 10
H c:xu.h.lo ro bcnu:.n c:
Pc:nc.uhlorophc:nol
Chry,c:nc-d u
Pc:.-ylc:nc:-d u
2-Fluorophcnol
Phc:nol-d )
Nicrobcn:u:nc:-d )
2-Fluorobiphc:nyl
2,4,6-T ribromophc:nol
T c:rohc:nyl-d . 1•
72.26
-4S.90
56.91
52.89
13-4.48
80.03
IS 1
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
u
IS 3
u
u
u
IS 4
u
u
IS 5
IS 6
10.36
12.90
16.56
19.68
25.44
29.57
7.86
9.59
11.43
15. 14
18.21
23.02
Method 8270A Leachate
Sample ID: NC-Rl-S5
0.87 20
0.69 20
0.89 20
0.87 20
1.61 20
0.83 20
1.71 20
1.43 20
1.40 20
1.31 20
1.65 20
3.35 10
36
24
2 57
3 , 53
3 67
5 80
NA-Not Applia.ble; Drt. Llm.it Dri~on Limit; Qu.ut. Lim.it Qu.rntibtion Limit
IS: Intern~ StutdMd; U: Undetected; B: P~nt In Bl.utlc; J: Esti.m.i~d-Bdow Qu=titation Limit; E: Estim.:ited-Above C~ibr:ition R.uige
Tri.:ingle ubor:itori~ of RTP, Inc.
801 Ca?itola Drive• Durham. North Carolina 2m3
?hone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Savar v3.5
Printed: 11:44 06/2:3~'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42014F
Sample File: VF755
Sample Vol.: 0.98 L Dilution Factor: 2.00
Method 8270A Leachate
Sample ID: NC-R2-S5
iiiy,~ ·_::. •·• .::-.. ; .. ·•. (: · :•;_ ::·.llllllllllllfllillllilllliiibilli
1,4-Dichlorobcnzcnc-d~ IS 1 10.38
Pyridine
1,4-Dichlorobcnzcnc
2-Mcthy[phcnol
3/4-Mcthylphcno[
H cx:i.d,Jo rocthw c
N:.phth~cnc-d•
Nicrobcnzcnc
Hcx:..chlorobuudicnc
Aa:n:..phthcnc-d 10
2,4,6-T richlorophcno[
2,4,5-T richlorophcno[
2,4-Dinicrocolue1c
Phcnwthn:nc-d 10
Hcx:...chlo robcnz=c
Pen c:...chlorophcnol
Chryscnc-d
, :_; .. .: tl Pcrylcnc-d ·:-::-:=.·-c·-· · -·
. 12
2-Fluorophcnol .· ;
Ph~nol-d ~ ,
Nicrobcnzcnc-d ,
2-~luorobiphe1yl
2,4,6-T ribromophcno[
T crphcnyl-d . . . 1'
Rrncwcdby ___ ...-,"J---"_O..:_-¼-_, ____ _
69.98
47.54
54.54
50.75
140.92
84.94
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
u
IS 3
u
u
u
IS 4
u
u
IS 5
IS 6
llitc .l!:_;2-'1 /~
12.93
16.58
19.70
25.46
. 29.58
7.88 -
9.61
11.45
15.16
18.22
23.03
0.92
0.72
0.93
0.91
1.69
0.86
1.78
1.47
1.44
1.34
1.67
3.40
1
1
2
3
3
5
NA-Not Applicable; Drl. limit Detrction Limit; Quan. Lim.it Qu~ntibtion Limit
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
35
24
55
51
70
85
IS: Intern.a.I SW1d.u-d; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: E.sti.nuted-B~ow Qunitibtion Limit; E: Estim.tted-Above ulibration Range
Tri.angle uboratori~ of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitol."t Drive• Durham. North Carolina 2Tl13
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
--~-.;..·:.'.::.?·:~ . ~ . ~--,--" .
~ .,:.:..:.-:-... ~·-.··---·-:: .. . --._--= -..
Savarv3.5
Printed: 11:42 06/24/1997
37
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42038F
Sample File: VF849
Sampl~ Vol.: 1.0 L
1 ,4--Dic.hloroben:zcne-d • Pyridine:
I .4-Dic.hlorobenz.c:nc
2-Mcchylphcnol
3/4-Mcchylphcnol
Ha:ac.hlorocthane
Naphcha.lcnc-d
5
Niuobenz.c:ne
Ha:...chlorobuudicnc
Ac:n;i.phchc:nc:-d 10
2.4,&-T ric.hlorophenol
2.4,5-Tric.hlorophcnol
2,4-Diniuoi:olucnc
Phc:n:..nthrenc:-d 10
Ha:...chlorobenz.c:nc
Pcnuc.hlorophcnol
Ouyscnc:-d 11
Pcrylc:nc--d 12
2-Fluorophc:nol
Phc:nol-d I
Niuobenz.c:nc--d I
2-Fluorobiphcnyl
2.4,&-T ribromophc:nol
T erphcnyl-d 1-1
Rc:vicwcdby ___ _,bj"'-~x=...-... ___ _
Dilution Factor: 2.00
IS I 10.10
84.13
54 .57
69.71
67.88
143.25
95.89
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
u
IS 3
u
u
u
IS 4
u
u
IS 5
IS 6
12.64
16.29
19.39
25.05
29.12
7.63
9.36
11.18
14.88
17.93
22.73
Method 8270 TCLP Leachate
Sample ID: NC-R3--S5 (
1.83 20
0.97 20
1.24 20
1.18 20
2.19 20
1.13 20
2.51 20
2.23 20
2.19 20
2.22 20
2.87 20
6.67 20
42
I 27
2 70
3 68
3 --, I -
5 96
NA-Not Applicable; Del Limit D~Ktion Limit Qum. Limit Qu=tibtion Limit
IS: i;temal St2nd.utl; U: Undetected; B: P~nt 1n Blmk; J: Esti.aut-ed-Bdow Qu=tibtion Limit E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range
Tri..tngle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitol.a Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone]n9 • Fax: [phone]
Savarv3.5
Printed: 18:05 07 /ffi /1997
27
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SA...'-l?LE NO.
HET30D 8080 ANALYSIS DATA S~:::::::ET
NC-Rl-S5
Lab Name: Triangle Labs of RTP, Inc. Project No.: 42014G
Matrix: LEACHATE Lab Sample ID: 170-73-12C
Sample wt/vol: 0.97000 L
\ Moisture/Lipid: ~YA
Lab File ID: MX15136
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 06/30/97
Date Analyzed: 07/08/97
Extraction: ~
Concentrated Extract Volume: 10.0 (mL)
Injection Volume: 1 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION
CAS NO. COMPOUND ug/L Q
72-20-8---------Endrin -------------<0.103 '0 I '---' 58-89-9---------ga=a-BEC (Lindane) _____ _ <0.052 '0 I , ___ ,
76-44-8---------Eeptachlor __________ _ <0.052 i_0 __ i
1024-57-3-7-----Eeptachlor epoxide _____ _ <0.052 1_0_1
72-43-5---------Methoxychlor ________ _ <0.516 I0 I ---' 12789-03-6------Chlordane (technical) ____ _ <0.206 i_0 __ i
<5.155 8001-35-2-------Toxaphene ________________ _ i_o __ i
I __ I
O-undetected, J=estimated, Pz\D>25, E•e.xceeds calib, D•diluted, X•\RSD>40
Prepared by c¥E<\.\, on 07/08/97 at 13:51:20
~
.-.-~
2
38 .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SA...l.f?LE NO.
METEOD 8080 ANAL~SIS DATA SE:ZET
-Lab Name: T=ia~gle Labs o: RTP, Inc.
Sample wt/vol: 0.97000 L
Extr~ction:~
Concentrated Extract Volume: 10.0 (m.L)
Injection Volume: 1 (uL)
COMPOUND
72-20-8---------Enci=in
NC-R2-SS
42014G
Lab Sample ID: 170-7 3-SC
Lab File ID : }IX15135
Date Received: 06/06/97
Date Extracted: 06/30/97
Date Analyzed: 07/08/97
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION
ug/L
<0.103
Q
-------------1_0 __
<0.052 58-89-9---------gamma-BEC (Lindane) ___________ _ 1_0 __ 1
<0.052 76-44-8---------Eeptachlor ________________ _ l_O __ l
1024-57-3-------Eeptachlor epoxide _____ _ <0.052 1_0_1
72-43-5---------Hethoxychlor ---------<0.516 1_0 __ 1
12789 -03 - 6 - - - - - -Chlordane (technical) ____ _ <0.206 1_0 __ 1
8001-35-2------Toxaphene __________ _ <5.155 1_0 __ I I I __ I
O=-undetected, J=esti.mated, P=\D>25, Eae.xceeds calib, D=diluted, Xa\RSD>40
I Prepared by t'f\,.\ on 07/08/97 at 13:51:15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2
30
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-·. ·-:.~::·
•; ~.:,•-.-~~-c
MET50D 8080 ANAL~SIS DATA SE:::ET
Lab Name: Triangle Labs of RT?, Inc. P:::oject
SAMPLE: NO.
NC-RJ-S5
No.: 42038G
Matrix: WATER Lab Sa.-nple ID: 170-97-SC
Lab File ID: MX15068 Sample wt/vo~: 0.96000 L
i Moisture/Lipid:~ Date Received: 06/10/97
Extraction:~ "Date Extracted: 06/23/97
Concentrated Extract Volume: 10.0 (mL) Date Analyzed: 06/25/97
Injection Volume: 1 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTR.l\TION
CAS NO. COMPOUND ug/L Q
I
I
72-20-8---------Endrin -------------<0.104 :_u __
58 -89 - 9 - - - - - - - - - g arnm a -3 H C (Lindane) _____ _ <0.052 :_u __
76-44-8---------Heptachlor __________ _ <0.052 :_u __
1024-57-3-------Heptachlor epoxide ______ _ <0.052 :_o __
72-43-5---------Methoxychlor _________ _ <0.521 :_u __
<0.208 12789-03-6------Chlordane (technical) ___________ _ :_o __
8001-35-2-------Toxaphene __________ _ <5.208 :_o __
O=undetected, J=estimated, P=\D>25, E=exceeds calib, D=diluted, X=\RSD>40
?repa=ed by tf:,µ on 06/26/97 at 12:52:41
1
24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
e Laboratories, Inc.
rtola Drive
rham, NC 27713
19) 544-5729
TCLP SUMMARY RESULTS
EPA
HW No. AnaJvte CAS No. Amt Found. mall
DC04 Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.OC60
0005 Barium 7440-39-3 0.3840
0006 cadmium 7440-43-9 <0.0010
D007 Chromium 7440-47-3 0.0130
D008 Lead 7439-92-1 0.9260
0009 Merrury 7439-97-6 <0.0004
D010 Selenium 7782-49-2 0.0030
D011 Silver 7440-22-4 <0.0010
..... ----._ ·----. ~z: ?.:.:~::,-:-::,,:! ----,-~--~--------.. --------....
: _.:_ •._· _-:--::-· t.;.;.;"••
. -~;.:_.c-c-c,:. "· · .. -----------~------. = ,· _____ .__~ ----_::_-..:..:,_4:;:..~ ... ·-·:
···.·."'-·~~~----·· . --··· --·
·--~~~~~ .,.___ ----------·----------------·. ••••~-w~.=:3,~•~ -• ••• •
-~;?~-~--=-··~-.
·--. . -------~=;-~.,a-. -·· .. ·-=--'~ftS=-'.~~.:'.-·
-~:~~?~~-.:--s-:: .. --:--:.:.. :~-~~~~~-_;:--;~_---·
: :::--=: .......... -~~~ -~sJ~ ~:_·_;~~~------_ -_ .
_.-... -:·· .... -· -· ·..-·-· ·---• ':'"-":" .. -----r:....· :-·_.
~~~----_;.;_~,__,_. ____ : .. ~-------·---... . -... -.-~:.-~=-==--.::..: .. : __ ' . --•.<-:,::: . __ ..... ______ -•• ---;;:···: -----.....
~~-:~i:;: =--~~~~ .. ;~~ ~
. :--= ~ ... :~_-tt~-~~;~::.v · .. · .. ~:-;~}j~:::tci~~; ~··~-....
. ·-~·~~--_ ..
--.... , --· ----· .... ·-----------~., --
TU Project Number. 42014E
Sample ID: NC-R1-S5
TU S?fnple ID:. 170-73-12C
Reg Level. mcv'L Detection Flaa
5
100
1
5
5
0.2
1
5
Rev 7 04/25/94
14
V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
le Laboratories, Inc.
Gaprtola Drive
urham, NC 27713
[phone]
TCLP SUMMARY RESULTS
EPA
HWNo. AnaMe CAS No. Amt Found. mall
DC04 Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.OC€0
0005 Barium 7440-39-3 02840
0006 Cadmium 7440-43-9 <0.0010
D007 Chromium 7440-47-3 0.0110
D008 Lead 7439-92-1 02200
0009 Mera.iry 7439-97-6 <0.0004
D010 Selenium 7782-49-2 O.CXX30
D011 Silver 7440-22-4 <0.0010
DETECTION FLAG: E = Amount Found is equal to or greater than Regulatory Umit
(0
TU Project Number. 42014E
Sample ID: NC-R2-S5
TU Sample ID: 170-73-SC
Reg Level. mall Detection Flaa
5
100
1
5
5
0.2
1
5
Rev 7 04/'25/94
11
V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
gle Laboratories, Inc.
Gaprtola Drive
mam, NC 2n13
919)544--5729
EPA
HW No. Analvte
DC04 Arsenic
0005 Barium
OOJ6 Cadmium
0007 Chromium
0008 Lead
0009 Mercury
D010 Selenium
D011 Silver
TCLP SUMMARY RESULTS
GAS No. Amt Found. mall
7440-38-2 <0.0040
7440-39-3 0.34BO
7440-43-9 <0.0010
7440-47-3 0.0CJ90
7439-92-1 0.2230
7439-97-6 <0.0004
n82-4S-2 <0.0050
7440-22-4 <0.0020
I DETECTION FLAG: E = Amount Found is equal to or greater than Regulatory Umit
I Ci)
TU Project Number. 42038E
Sample ID: NC-R3-S5
TU Sample ID: 170-97-SC
Rea Level. mall Detection Flaa
5
100
1
5
5
0.2
1
5
...
Rev 7 04/25/94
12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TLI Project: 42038B
SBLK 061697
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis .
Client Sample:
Client Project:
Sample Matri'C: Date Receive d: / /
TLI ID :
NC PROJECT
NA2S04
SBLK 061697 Date Extracted: 06/16/97
Date Analyzed: 06/24/97
Sample Size:
Dry Weight:
Total MonoCB
Total DiCB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total HexaCB
Total HeptaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
0.010 kg
n/a
13C1:-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB
13<:1:-2.2' .3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB
,..
·: IJCi:-2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB
-13C1:-2.2' ,5,5'-TetraCB
13<:1:-3.3' ,4,4' ,5.5' -HexaCB
ND
.N'D
ND
ND
N1)
ND
ND
ND
!',.11)
ND
n/a
n/a
98 .0
92.7
74.7
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Blank Fi.le:
Analyst DD
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
98.0
92.7
74.7
Dau Reviewer. TuJ.LJ I .J
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.-,
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Page 1 of I
Ev
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Analysis File: YP23100
Spike File:
ICal:
Coneat
SPPCBF0l
PCBY617
YP229
% Moisture:
% Lipid:
n/a
n/a
n/a % Solids:
0.77
0.87
1.31
0.78
124
07/06/97
23.93
29.85
2535
19.90
28.33
PCBl'_PSR v1.00. l.All.S 6.10.lIJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
; .. •.·.·.-.-._.._ ....__ __ .......,.r_. -'"-""" . ....._..A.~ .... ·.•-•.· ::;·_::::~::::::-::-:-·-.-.. ·-····-:-·-;.;.:-;:•:::.:: .. •.·.;;:::::::::::;::::.:-·-·._. ·/-:-:--:-·-.-•:;.~=::<::
TLI Project:
Client Sample:
42014B
SBLK 061697
Client Project: NC PROJECT
Sample Matrix: NA2SO4
TLI ID: . SBLK 061697
Sample Size: 0.010 kg
Dry Weight: n/a
Total MonoCB
Total Di CB
Total TriCB
Total TetraCB
Total PentaCB
Total Hex.aCB
Total HepcaCB
Total OctaCB
Total NonaCB
DecaCB
TOTAL PCB
TOTAL PCB + EMPC
uc1:·3.3' ,4,4'-TetraCB
13Ci:-2.2' .3.3' .5,5' ,6,6' -OcraCB
13C1:-2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -Hex.aCB
lJCi:-2.2' ,5,5'-TerraCB
13C1:r3,3 ',4,4' .5,5' -HexaCB
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
n/a
n/a
942
85.0
71.7
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
Blank Fi.le:
Analyst:
02
02
02
03
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
942
85.0
71.7
Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis
Analysis File: YP22300
I I
06/16/97
06/23/97
1.0
DD
20%-130%
20%-130%
20%-130%
Spike File: SPPCBF0l
ICal: PCBY617
ConCal: YP212
% Moisture: n/a
% Lipid:
% Solids:
0.78
0.92
131
0.77
129
n/a
n/a
23.93
29.85
2535
19.90
28.33
Data Reviewer:------~-'-""------Wl.7/97
Page 1 of 1 Pa!F .)'SR. Yl-00. LARS 6.10.0:
Triangle Laboratories, Inc.-, Gv
801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 14
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Printed: 13:34 06/27/97
146
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:ip~Jed Number: 42111
:,~_al!iple File: HR954
.· -~.--7': --·-
Sample Wgt: 0.005 Kg
Pcnc,J!uorobcnz.i:nc:
Dichlorodifluoromc:thmc:
Chloromc:thmc:
Vinyl Chloride:
Bromomc:thmc:
Chlciroc:thwc:
T richlorofluoromc:thmc:
l , 1-Dichloroethc:nc:
Mc:thyicnc: chloride:
trms-1,2-Dichlorocthc:nc:
:1.1-Dichloroethwc:
-1.2-Dichlorop ro pmc
ci.s'.-1,2-Dichloroc-thcnc:
-Chlo.reform _-.
-~romochloromcth.wc:
.1,1,1-T richloroc:thwc:
;-i .4-D ifluo ro bcru:cnc:
. .: ... ---:•:u.roon-tx:t:r:I.Chlorid.c:··.,;._-d
:-:!Ll~6ichloropropcnc -. ---.-...... ,.-: .. -~ .. ---
._:::Baux=nc:±,1-of<)-.:-7 :---~
~Jl £:f5idu~~thwc
."_; :r nch.lo~i:hcnc .. .:.-------·-... . . ~ji ~qidil~ropropmc
• :nct,-:.O~omc:i:hwc .:.::·:-:-
• :~Bro~od.icluoromc:tlunc:
ci.s-J ~pichloropropcnc:
Dilution Factor:
IS 1
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
0.54 ]
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
1.00
5.02
3.04
5.76
Method 8260 WATER
Sample ID: VBLK061697
% Moisture: NA
0.13 10
0.17 10
0.18 10
0.26 10
0.33 10
0.16 10
0.25 10
10
0.19 10
0.08 10
0.12 10
0.21 10
0.09 10
0.35 10
0.11 10
-.
0.17 10
0.10 .10
0.06 10
.0.11 10
0.18 10
0.12 10
•0.21 10
0.10 10
0.09 )0
NA-Not Applicable; Det.. Limit Dete<:tion Limit; Quan. Limit Qu.antitation Limit
~ IS: Intern~ Swichrd; U: Undetiected; B: ~nt In Bl=k; J: Esti.m.ttrd-Below Q=ntitation Limit; E: Estim.ated-Above C.alibr.ation R.ange
Tri.angle Labor.atoriu of RTP, Inc:.
801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 2771.3
Phone:. (919) 544-.:>729 • Fax: [phone]
Savar v3.5
Printed: 16:41 06/25/1997
33
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42015
Sample File: HR939
Pc:n ufluorocx:nzcne
Dichlorodifluoromethme
Chloromethme
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomechme
Chlorocthane
T rich lo rofluorometh:ine
l, 1-Dichlorocthcne
Methylene chloride
cnns-1,2-Dichloroethene
1. 1-Dichlorocth:ine
2.2-Dichloroprop:ine
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Bromochloromethme
1.1. 1-T richlorocm:ine
1,4--Difluorocx:nzcne
Cuban tctn.c.½loride
1.1-Dichloropropcne
Ben:z.::ne
1.2-Dichlorocm:ine
T richlorocthenc
1,2-Dichloroprop:inc
Dibromometh:inc
Bromodichloromethmc
cis-1,3-Dichloropropcne
IS 1
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
0.36 J
u
u
u
u
0.40 J
u
u
IS 2
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
3.04
4.76
5.77
Method 8260 H2O
Sample ID: VBLK 061397
0.09 10
0.11 10
0.12 10
0.18 10
0.22 10
0. 10 10
0.16 IO
10
0.13 10
0.05 10
0.08 10
0. 14 10
10
0.23 10
0.07 10
0.12 10
0.07 10
0.04 10
0.07 10 .
0.12 10
0.08 10
0.14 10
0.07 10
0.06 10
NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit Detection Limit; Quw. Limit Qu=tibtion Limit
IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blwk; J: E.,tiIIuted-Below Quantitation Limit; E: utimated-Above Calibration Range
Trimgle Laboratories of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitol.a Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2;"713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Savarv3.5
Printed: 17:48 06/27/1997
68
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42014H
Sample File: FV475
Method 8240 LEAD-I FLUID
Sample ID: VTCLPBLK061697
liiiii~~iiil!~iiiliililttii&iliiiililliiliiliiilill
Bromochloromcchwc IS 1 4.84
Vinyl Chloride
1, 1-Dichlorocchcnc
Chloroform
1.2-Dichlorocch:uic
1.4--Difluorolxnzcnc
2-Buunonc
Grbon c.ccnchloridc
Iknz.:nc
T richlorocchcnc
Chlorolxnz.:nc-<l s
T ct.--uhlorocchcnc
Chlorolxnz.cnc
1.2-Dichlorocch...ne-d . . .
T olu.c:nc-d :--.: · · I .
4-Bromofluorobenzenc
0.28
0.19
0.25
u
u
u
u
rs 2
u
u
u
u
IS 3
u
u
6.05
10.33
5.47
7.98
12.63
0.19
0.25
0.07
0.07
2.68
0.1 0
0.05
0.15
0.15
0.07
1
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
112
116
100
--·--.... -·-·--~:.:~:
. ~ ··--·~ ;t·..J.-.....: ..;.....-....
---~-~~
Reviewed by'--: ~p~tt-D= 7 1_j_1 9-l . -:~:::::__~~
_ _-___ -~~----~ ;~ NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit Drlectioa Limit; Qu~. Limit Qu.antibtion Limit -__ -~:~2-
_ _-:_: IS: Inwriil S~dud; U: Undeteru-d; B: Pres-ent In Bl~k; J: Est~ted-Bdow Qu.antibtion Limit; E: utinuted-Above Ca.libr.tti~~ R~;.;;·~-
Tri.angle ~bor.ituries of RTP, Inc. --·_.
801 Capitol.a Drive • Durham. North Carolina 2.1713
~ [phone] • Fax: (919) ~1-:._:i:~ ·
. ,~.-:-:·, ... :.:._-6Y . _t ':-~ -~--. _---·'._,"'-. 11 · -· ';
. ·:· ·-. ··.
. -. . ----.... :
---· -·--------~--"'~ ~--~~-, =,:,,~~~
.......... --------• -.. -~--~ '"--=~~. -~-~~~-----. --··----··: -.
·-: ·•...:..-~··::.. ·_-· :;. ... ~~-!!' ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number. 42038H
Sample File: FV475
Sample Vol.:
Bromochloromc:thmc:
Vinyl Chloride:
1, 1-Dichlorocchc:nc:
Chlo ro fo rr.1.
1.2-Dichloroctl-..wc:
1,4-Difluorobcnu:nc:
2-Buc.monc:
Cubon tct.~d1loridc:
Bcnu:nc:
Tri duo rocilic.'1c:
Chlo robc:nzcnc:-d
l
T c:t.~c.h lorocchc:nc:
Chlorobc:nunc:
1.2-Dichlorocuum::-d ..
Tolucnc:-d ' 4-Bromof!uorobc:nzx:nc:
0.005 L
Rcv1c:wcdby ____ .../?;;...__;;_C\j:!f:::~'..__ __ _
Dilution Factor.
0.23
0.19
0.25
IS 1
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
u
u
u
IS 3
u
u
Dw: 11_i_1°1
1.00
4.84
6.05
10.33
5.47
7.98
12.63
·Method 8240 LEACH FLUID
Sample ID: VfCLPBLK061697
0.19
0.25
0.07
0.07
2.68
0.10
0.05
0.15
0.15
0.07
1
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
112
116
100
NA-Not Appliabl~ Drl. Limit Drlection Limit; Qu.a.n. Limit Qu..a.ntiution Limit
IS: In~m~ Sand.u-d; U: Undetected; B: ~t In Bl=lc.; J: E.st~~d-Bdow Q=ntibtion Limit; E: E.stinuted-Above Calibr:ation R.Ulge
Trun;Je ubor:atx>riu of RTP, Inc.
Wl Gpitola Drive• Durham. Nor+..h uro1ina 2.1713
Phone: [phone] • Fax: (919) s+h5491 6v Savar v3.5
Printed: 17:16 rn /r13/1997
23
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number: 42038H
Sample File: FV474
Vinyl Chloride
1.1-Dichlorocthene
Chloroform
1.2-Dichlorocthwe
1,4-Difluorobcnzcne
2-Buc.anone
~bon cetn.chloride
Bcnzcn~
T ridi.lorocthene
Chlorobcnzcne-d l
T etnchlorocthene
Chlorobcnzcne
1.2-Dichloroc:.Iune-d,
Toluene-cl ' 4-Bromofluorobcnzcne
Rcvicwedby __ __,~::..-"-~_J_~'.'-----
0.14
0.15
0.11
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
u
u
u
IS 3
u
u
6.04
10.33
5.46
7.98
12.63
Method 8240 Vv ATER
Sample ID: VBLK070297
0.18
0.24
0.07
0.07
2.61
0.10
0.05
0.15
0.15
0.07
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
96
100
88
NA-Not Appliable; Det. Lim.it Detection Limit; Qu=. Limit Qu.a.ntitation Limit
IS: In~m.il Stancu.rd; U: Undetected; B: Pt-ei.ent In Bl.ink; J: utim.ibtd-Below Qu.intitation Limit; E: Eatinut"1:l-Above ~ibr.ition R=5e
TrunsJe ubor.itorie.s of RTP, Inc.
801. Capitola Drive• Durham. Nort-'i. Carolina 2i713 ~= [phone] • Fax: (919) ~1
Savarv3..5
Printec: 17:16 07 /08/19'17
27
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample Vol.: 1.0 L
1,4-Dichlorobcn:z.enc-d " Pyridine
1,4-Dichlorobcn:z.::nc
2-Mcchylphcnol
3/4-Mcchylphcnol
H o:2chlo rocch211c
Naphch:i.lcnc-d
4
Nitrobcnz.cnc
Ho:2ch10J0buud.icnc
Accn2phchcnc-d
10
2.4,6-T richlorophcnol
2.4,5-T richlorophcnol
2,4-Dinitrocoluc:nc
Phcn211~._nc-d 10
Ha::u:hlorobcnz.cnc
Pcnuch.lo;.;phcnol
ai;yse.nc-d • -..... 1.:
P erylc:nc-d-! . · ll i-·. . ""! -
2-F\uorop~cnol
Phcnol-d L ,..,~
Nitrobcnz.cne-d )
2-Fluorobiphc:nyi
2,4,_6-T ribromophcnol
T crphcnyl-d . 14
Rcvi=d by ___ 61-=--Q.£_..___
Dilution Factor:
75.29
51.03
62.64
57.07
118.01
79.56
IS 1
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
u
IS 3
u
u
u
IS 4
u
u
IS 5
IS 6
2.00
10.10
12.64
16.28
1939
15.05
29.13
7.62
935
11.18
14.88
17.92
22.73
Method 8270 Ext. Fl. #1
Sample ID: SBLK 062897 (
1.76 20
0.94 20
1.20 20
1.14 20
210 20
1.07 20
238 20
204 20
200 20
203 20
259 20 . . .
..
6.02 20 -
38
1 26
2 63
3 57
3 59
5 80
NA-Not Applio.blt!; Ott. Limit Dt!tection Limit; Quan. Limit Q=ntitation Limit
IS:.Intenal Standud; U: Undt!tiectt!d; B: P~nt In Blank; J: E.atim3ttd-Bdow Qu.u,titation Limit; E: &tim.ate<I-Abon C.Jibntion R.utge
Triangle ubor.atoriu of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 2m3
. \ .. ~ [phone] • Fax: [phone]
~-~'-:~...,_-, --~~-=-:.·.
~~~--:·-·· -. _..,._ ·-_.. __ ... _:"".::.: ··--
Savarv3.5
Printed: 18:-05 07 / CI3 I 1997
32
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project Number. 42014F
Sample File: VF748
l ,4-Dichlorobcnu:nc-d4
Pyridine
1,4-Dichlorobcnu:nc
2-Mc:thylphcnol
3/4-Mcthylphcnol
Ha::i.chlorocthmc
Nwhth:i.lc:nc-d • I
Nicrobcnu:ne
Ha:u:h.lorobuudienc:
Acen:i.phthcne-d 10
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
2.4,5-T richlorophenol
2,4-Dinicrocolucne
Phc:n:l.!lthrc:ne-d
• 10
H a:u:h.loro bcru.e.ne
Pc:nuchlorophenol
Ouyscnc:-d 12 Payic:ne-d __ , ___ -
. u
2-Fluoro p
0
hcnol
Phe'nol-d ~ ' . --, .
Nia-obcnzcne-d . ,
2-Fluorob!phenyl
2.4,6-T ribromophenol
T erphenyl..:a -_·-:.::--:·_
. . H
Rrnc:wcd by ___ ...:L0'.\c....=....--=-~----
8299
56.27
66.02
60.25
135.41
86.86
IS 1
u
u
u
u
u
IS 2
u
u
IS 3
u
u
u
IS 4
u
u
10.36
12.90
16.56
19.68
IS 5 25.44
IS 6 ---29.56 --~
7.86
9.59
11.44
15.14
18.21
23.01
M ethod 8270A Leachate
Sample ID: SBLK061397
0.97 20
O.Tl 20
0.99 20
0.97 20
1.80 20
0.92 20
1.90 20
1.58 20
1.54 20
1.44 20
1.81 20
3.68 20
1 . 41
28
2 66
3 60
3 68
5 87
NA-Not Appliable; Det. Limit Detection Limit; Qu.m. Limit Qiuntibtion Limit
IS: InttnU..! Sbnd.ttd; U: Undetected; B: ~ent In Blxik; J: E.sti..t=~d-Be.low Qu.mtibtion Limit; E: E.1tim~te<i-Above c....Iibr.ation R..mge
Trungle ubor.atoriu of RTP, Inc.
801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27i13
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
----·----
Savarv3.5
Printed: 11:42 06/24/1997
42
--------... ---· ·---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SAMPLE NO.
----~~--~
METHOD 8080 ANAL~SIS DATA S~'!'
Lab Name: Triangle Labs of RT?, Inc.
Matrix: WATER
Sample wt /vol: 0.95500 L
% Moisture/Lipid:~
Extra~tio_n: ~
~
concentrated Extract Volume: 10.0 (mL)
Injection Volume: 1 (uL)
CAS NO. COMPOOND
72-20-8---------Endrin
42038G PBLlC
P=oject No.: 42038G
Lab Sample ID: ?3LK
Lab Fi le ID: M.Xl5065
Date Received:
Date Ext=acted: 06/23/97
Date Analyzed: 06/25/97
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION
ug/L Q
I I
<0.105 -------------:_u __
<0.052 58 - B 9 - 9 - - - - - - - - -gamma -B H C (Lindane) ____________ _ :_u __
<0 .052 76-44-8---------Heptachlor _________________ _ :_u __
<0.052 1024-57-3-------Heptachlor epoxide ___________ _ :_u __
<0.524 72-43-5---------Methoxychlo= ________________ _ :_u __
<0.209 12789-03-6------Chlordane (technical) ___________ _ :_u __
<5.236 8001-35-2-------Toxaphene ________________ _ :_o __
Ozundetected, J=estimated, pc\D>25, E=exceeds calib, D=ci lutec, X=%RSD>40
Prepared by tf'El~ on 06/26/97 at 12:52:24
... ------· .
-------· ... -----~---· .
. ·--...:--· -.-.. -. .,.,. -------
1
32
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SAM.?LE NO. :. _ · --~:-....
METSOD 8080 ANALYSIS DATA SEEET .:~:--~~:_:-_ '".~ -----------
42014G ?3L.K
Lab Name: T=iangle Labs of RT?, Inc.
Matrix: LEACF-1\TE
s~~ple wt/vol: 1.00000 L
\ Moisture/Lipid: u.B_
Extraction:~
\}
Concentrated Ext=act Volume: 10.0 (mL)
Injection Volume: 1 (uL)
CAS NO. COMPOUND
P=oject No.: 42014G
Lab Sample ID: P3L:K
Lab File ID: MX15130
Date Received:
Date Extracted: 06/30/97
Date Analyzed: 07/08/97
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION
ug/L Q
72-20-8---------Endrin <0.100 u -------------I I
58 -89 - 9 - - - - - - - - -gamma -3 EC (Lindane) _________ <_O_._o_s_o_ 0 I ---' 76-44-8---------Eeptachlo= ______________ <_O_._O_S_O_
1024-57-3-------Eeptachlor epoxide __________ <_0_._0_5_0_
72-43-5---------Methoxychlor _____________ <_O_._s_o_o_
0 :
u
u
I I
I I
12789-03-6------Chlordane (technical) ________ <_0_._2_0_0_ O I
8001-35-2-------Toxaphene <5.000 1_o __ l
----------------------------'--'
0-undetected, J•estimated, P-\D>25, E•exceeds calib, D•diluted, X•\RSD>40
Prepared by~ on 07/08/97 at 13:50:59
2
46
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
gle Lal:xJratories, Inc.
1 Gapitola Drive
urham, NC 27713
[phone]
EPA
HW No. Ana!vte
00)4 Arsenic
OOJ5 Barium
DC06 Cadmium
OOJ7 Chromium
OOJ8 Lead
00)9 Mera.iry
D010 Selenium
D011 Silver -
TCLP SUMMARY RESULTS
CAS No.
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-43-9
7440-47-3
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
Amt Found mcv1..
<0.0040
0.0590
<0.0010
<0.0030
O.CC20
<0.0004
<D.0050
<D.0020
TU Project Number. 42038E /'
Sample ID: TCLP BLANK d
TU Sample ID: TCLP Blank
Reg Level. mall
5
100
1
5
5
0.2
1
·s
Detection Flaa
--·-·-•---·-·-·-·-----···-···-·· ----··-···------... -------·-···-
•--------------·-· -·-----------·------·· ... ---------------
-···-----------------------.--------Rev 7 04/25/94
DETECTlON FLAG: E = Amount Found is equal to or greater than Regulatory Umit
GD
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
gle Laboratories, Inc.
Capitola Drive
mam, NC 27713
[phone]
EPA
'rlW No. Analvte
DC04 Arsenic
DOOS Barium
DC06 Cadmium
DCX)7 Chromium
0008 Lead
DCX)9 Merrury
0010 Selenium
0011 Silver
TU Project Number. 42014E
Sample ID: TCLP BLANK ( ~
TU Sample ID: TCLP Blank
TCLP SUMMARY RESULTS
CAS No. Amt Found. mall . Rea Level. mall Detection Flaa
7440-38-2 <0.0050 5
7440-39-3 <0.0020 100
7440-43-9 <0.0010 1
7440-47-3 <0.0020 5
7439-92-1 O.CXX34 5
7439-97-6 <0.0004 0.2
n82-49-2 <0.0030 1
7440-22-4 <0.0010 5
Rev 7 04/25/94
I DETECTlON FLAG: E = Amount Found is equal to or greater than Regulatory Umit
G_D 24
I . -..
--• w" 0 •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Product Gas -Sample Location S6
1. PCBs
-run 1-sample ECO-l -S6-i\t123
-run 2-sample EC0-2-S6-i'vl23
-run 3-sample EC0-3-S6-i\tl23
2. PCDDs and PCDFs
-run 1-sample ECO-l-S6-i\t123
-run 2-sample EC0-2-S6-i\tl23
-run 3-sample EC0-3-S6-i\t123
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
l I l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
So S7 So -S7 So S7 $.a.m plin g l..oc1tion
~plingID ECO-l-S6-:t--23 ECO-l-S7-M23 EC0-2-S 6-}.{23 EC0-2-S7-M23 EC0-3-S6-...\.ill ECO-":,-S?-M
:Swt Time
Stop Time
SAmplc Volume
G~ F1ow R..!.tc •
l}.,{onochlorobiphcnyl
[)ichlorobiphcnyl · ·
T richlorobiphenyl
< -I:)cu::ctian Llmi t
d.,cf
dscf7hr
pg
pg/dscf
lbs/hr
PS
pg/d.scf
lbs/hr
pg
pg/d.scf
lbs/hr
... --pg
pg/<bcf
lbs/hr
·--
<•'·
<
<
-13:50
16:35
18.613
57.0S
400.0
21.49
2.70£-12
85.0
4.57
5.75E-13
480.0
25.79
3.25£-12
370.0
2.50E-12
1.0
0.05
6.765-1 S
<
<
<
13 :50
16:32
137 .831
3360.00
10.0
0.07
5.37E-13
38.0
0.28
2.04E-12
210.0
1.52
l.13E-l l
l.13E-l l
·1.0 <
0.01 <
537E-14 <
• Notr:: Gu flow rm for Location So provided by Eco Logic.
4
---CB . --:.:.·_:-_ ... . .• ·:;·--:,•~_:~w.-_...:...· .. : .. -~~-=------' .. ----~~-::--=---
12:36 12:36
15:56 15:51
28.887 154.493
55.30 3060.00
440.0 8.4
15.23 0.05
1.865-12 3.67E-13
52.0 25.0
1.&0 0.16
2.19E-13 1.09E-12
210.0 130.0
7.27 O.S4
8.86E-13 5.68E-12
l.18E-!2 6.55E-12
.......
15:27
18:21
25.240
53 .61 .
450.0
17.83
2 l lE-12
31.0
1.23
l.45E-13
46.0
l.&2
2.lSE-13
2.43E-13
15
18
136.:
2940
0
l.57E-
0.
4..23E-
4:
0.
l.95E-
3.71E-
< ,--::.·-< ... ---

·
-.. ·•---... :. .• .....: r--....... •• ·----~~
<:·:?...:Z'.::.'°'1.0 <l~~t < (0'' 0.04 ·:-:;i:t:=:-0.0
<: 4.68E-15 < ·.. 4.75E-1
---·---------1"1" ~".:,'t.-----=-~= <··.--..:_::=,::::..1.0 <..:.-~:'l..:;"i.o <·~--,·1.
~-~.::~--:=: 0.01 < 2·,;:=~ 0'.04 -<~ 0.0
1.0 <
0.03 <
4.21£..15 <
1.0 <
0.01 <
437E-14 <
LO <
0.04 <
4.68:&15 <
. ---.. -
1.r
0.0
4.76E-1:
I
I
I
TABLE 2-2. RUN 1 -DIOXINSIFURANS SUMMARY -LOCATION S6
I
I l
I l
I I
I I ...
I t:·
·Run'N-0.:.-.... ,:-::,.-, .. ,::.::: \/::/?:1:::'\< · · · ·· ·. ·· · · · · ... · · · · .... , ·' · .· ...... ,.,, . ., . . ,sfill1plin£rtj:>i< : ·•Eco~i zs~Miir,, .• , ••• ·· •,·,··•··>EPA'••,:·•·:· .. ··••:·• .... ··.:·····:· \':•
Date:, . · : 2~j unei97 .· ..... ····•···· Torie . · 1 ·,. Quinti.t/ .
~~};:J<>lume:••'·•··'· .. ·.. :?!06.!}'tij~rn·**** >··:· / :;: F1~t>t: '.l· Detected:
PCDD (Dioxin) Isomers
a
a
a
2,3,7,8 TCDD
Other TCDD
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD
Other PeCDD
Other
Other
Total
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD
HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD
HpCDD
OCDD
1.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.01
0.0
0.001
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0:0.
():0
0.00
0.0
0.000
23
23
29
29
25
23
25
25
14
14
22
PCDF (Furan) Isomers _ I !J t a Other iiiit TCDF . ~.~ : ~.~ • ·~
;;:;~~~---'1,.2,3,7,8 PeCDF '0.05 ND 0.00 : -28 I i::~: . a Other ~6;;;8 PeCDF •~.~ : ~.~ :i:
:;::,_:~~:-:-: _-1,.2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.1 ND 0.0 ; 8.5
I--:-~--.,),.2,3,6,7,8HxCDF ·0.1 ND -0.0 -93 I /i:~~~---------<~:;:;:::~~; -_ :_:~:i : : . . __ ' ~:~ ... li~
~~:..:.--:.::-.:.._ · -a -Other -HxCDF . · 0.0 ND 0.0 : 13
I. l~i:~=-~ . : 1,.2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF '· 0.01 ND 0.00 -: Z5
~-_ . 1,.2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ·0.01 ND 0.00 ,. 29
~~2·-~-__ -.. ·a -"Other.'HpCDF · ---~---· · 0.0 · ND -0.0 : . :: 29
I (t:-.: i%>f'!~c;:£~~£f ~.::r01,:;f~~!,<7''70); 'i"' "'74~~ ~"~~~ ~t!fiB ~~t;t~
___,~--. -: __ -.:·~Sum (based on Total Isomers), pg 0
I ,'.~;:~-: -~ -__ . ~:~~um (based on Toxic Equivalents); pg ---. O.O .
.:,--::'_--=:_:: .. ------Wei tea Tex. E . Rate lbs/hr ;.u:r::·.: •,
I f B::
I '
Ii
I I
• -~OCFRPar1266,AppctdixIX, Table-1.0.
•• -~ noted otherwise, all wu= reported an in pg.
•• • -~teaion lilnits are not gtw:n for tk1ec1ed congeners.
• • • • Gas flow rate provitkd by Eco Logic. ·
0.000 :
· 0.0
. TA.B-DIOX.WX:4. 07r:!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ---
-.~·-
I
I
I
I
_; --
TABLE 2-4. RUN 2 -DIOXINS/FURANS Sl.JNL'-'1ARY -LOCATION S6
Run No.: 2
: Sampling ID: . . . . ... · Eco;:2~S&:M23 ·. . ... · .•... EPA >
Date: J.:June.:97 · : Torie• : :Q~tit j, <
. SampleVol~~e: . . .. .. : 28.887• dscf > .·.·.••·_:•·.:•.••.•··.:,·.•.1:.• .. ;.: .•. ·.•.··:,•F·'Ea· qctuo:i)r·~ .. ••· >!• .Detected 7: ·•·••··. ···•GasFlow: ··\ ::/ .. •i><o:9:i'dscfi-ri\ .. ~_.>,< -··••·· >•.•E
PCDD (Dioxin) Isomers
2,3,7,8 TCDD
a Other TCDD
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD
a Other PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD
a Other HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD
a Other HpCDD
Total OCDD
Sum (based oo Total Isomers), pg
Rate, lbs/hr
Weighted Sum (based on Toxic Equivalents), pg
Weighted Tox. Eq. Rate, lbs/hr
PCDF (Furan) Isomers
1.0 ND
0.0 ND
0.5 ND
0.0 ND
0.1 ND
0.1 ND
0.1 ND
0.0 NTI
0.01 ND
0.0 ND
0.001 ND
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.000
0.000
0.0
.. . ·, ·. ;,: .... *:
21
21
35
35
11
11
11
11
16
16
26
2,3,7,8 TCDF 0.1 ND 0.0 30
a Other TCDF 0.0 ND 0.0 30
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.05 ND 0.00 32
2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.5 ND 0.0 28
a Other PeCDF 0.0 ND 0.0 32
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.1 ND 0.0 4.9
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.1 ND 0.0 SA
2,3,4,6,7,8 Hx.CDF 0.1 ND 0.0 5'.7
1,2,3,7,8,9 Hx.CDF 0.1 ND 0.0 73
a Other HxCDF 0.0 ND 0.0 73
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.01 ND 0.00 1.5
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.01 ND 0.00 18
a Other HpCDF 0.0 ND 0.0 18
Total OCDF 0.001 ND 0.000 18
Sum (based on Total Isomers), pg 0
Rate, lbs/hr 0.0
Weighted Sum (based on Toxic Equivalents); pg-
.. --Weiizhted Tox. En. Rate. lbs/hr
• --'O CFR Parl 266, Appcidu IX. Tablt! ,. o.
• • -Unlus 11ated otkrwlst!, all value rt:porlt!d are bt pg.
••• -Dt!tection limits are rial gtw:nfor d.ett!Clt!d congrners.
• • • • Ga.s flaw rau provided by Eco Logic.
a -Total does IIOI btcludt! Sl>t!cific isomt!n ort:sarted.
7·
T AB-DIOX. WIC4 rnf'!9197 ·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-6. RUN 3 -DIOXINS/FUR.\NS SUMMARY -LOCATION S6
Run No.: . , • . . . 3 ·
sampling ID:· ECO-3-S~M23 . •
·,.Date: .. ,.,.· .. ·· ,: ·.
Sarnpl~:yplurne: < . , 25j4q d~cf · .··,·... . .
Gas Flo\v: · < ·:: 0.92 dscfm'""'0
PCDD (Dioxin) Isomers
2,3,7,8 TCDD
a Other TCDD
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD
a Other PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD
a Other HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD
a Other HpCDD
Total OCDD
Sum (based on Total Isomers), pg
Rate, lbs/hr
Weighted Sum (based on Toxic Equivalents), pg
Weighted Tox. E . Rate, lbs/hr
PCDF (Furan) Isomers
2,.3,7,8 TCDF
a Other TCDF
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF
a Other PeCDF
~~~~
1,2,.3,4,7,8 HxCDF
1,2,.3,6,7,8 HxCDF
2,.3,4,6;7,8 HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF
a . Other HxCDF
1,2,.3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF
1,2,.3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF
a Other HpCDF
Total OCDF
··i•TPA ··' .. ·. ··• ·>. .. ·.·:
· · < Tori~· ·· .• • : bllfil};if
. . :: :,:,EqJiy~ .. .• ·. Detected
Factor.. i<
1.0 tm
0.0 },TD
0.5 ND
0.0 },TD
0.1 },TD
0.1 },TD
0.1 ND
0.0 },TD
0.01 },TD
0.0 ND
0.001 ND
0.1 ND
0.0 ND
0.05 ND
0.5 ND
0.0 },TD
0.1 ND
0.1 ND
0.1 · ND
0.1. ND .
0.0 ND
0.01 ND
0.01 ND
0.0 ND
0.001 ND
Sum (based on Total Isomers), pg 0
Rate., lbs/hr-0.0
Weighted Sum (based on Toxic Equivalents), pg
Wei ted Tox. E . Rate lbs/hr
• --10 CFR Part 266, Appo,dix IX. Table -I. 0.
• • -Unkss noted otMrwi..u, all values ~ported are in pg.
••• -D<tection limits arr: not gtw:nfor detected congeners.
• • • • Gas flow raJe provided l,y Eco Logic.
a -Total does not tndude s cf c isomers ~sented
9 G0
0.0 26
0.0 26
0.0 15
0.0 15
0.0 29
0.0 27
0.0 29
0:0 29
0.00 20
0.0 20
0.000 74
0.000
0.0
0.0 30
0.0 30
0.00 34
0.0 29
0.0 34
0.0 T.J
0.0 4.9
0.0 5.4
0.0 5.7
0.0 7.3
0.00 6.9
0.00 8.0
0.0 8.0
0.000 15
T AB-DIOX. WJ(4 ~r191'n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Exhaust Gas -Sample Location S7
1. PCBs
-run 1-sample ECO-l-S7-M23
-run 2-sample EC0-2-S7-M23
-run 3-sample EC0-3-S7-M23
2. PCDDs and PCDFs
-run 1-sample ECO-l-S7-M23
-run 2-sample EC0-2-S7-M23
-run 3-sample EC0-3-S7-M23
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I \ '
I i
I i ,~
I
Sampling Location
Sampling ID
11Start Time
:Stop Time
:Sample Volume
Gas Flow Rate •
Monochlorobiphenyl
Dichlorobiphenyl
If richlorobiphenyl
. -... ---... --~,.-· .. -----· --
Pen~chlorobiph~~ ·.-:::
dscf
dscti'hr
pg
pg/dscf
lbs/hr
pg
pg/dscf
lbs/hr
pg
pg/dscf
lbs/hr
pg
pg/dscf
lbs/hr
pg
pg/dscf
lbs/hr
TABLE 2-1. PCB.s SUMMA..RY -North Carolins
S6 S7
ECO-l -S6-~f23 ECO-!-S7-M13
13:50 13:50
16:35 16:.32
18.613 137.831
57.08 3360.00
400.0 10.0
21.49 0.07
2.70£-12 5.37£-13
85.0 38.0
4.57 028
5.75E-13 2.04E--12
480.0 210.0
25.79 1.52
3.25E-12 l.13E-ll
370.0 210.0
19.88 -·-·· 1.52
2.50E-12 l.l 3E--l l
170.0 150.0
9.13 1.09
1.15£-12 8.06E-!2
S6
EC0-2-S6--M13
[2:36
15:56
28.887
55.30
4-40.0
15.23
l.86E-12
52.0
1.80
2.19E-l3
210.0
7.27
8.86E-13
280.0
.. -.. 9.69
l.lSE-12
170.0
5.89
7.17&13
S7
EC0-2-S7-}..,{23
.... -. ---
12:36
15:51
154.493
3060.00
8.4
0.05
3.67E-13
25.0
0.16
1.09E-12
130.0
0.84
5.68E-12
150.0
--0.97
6.55E-12
240.0
. 1.55
I.OSE-11
S6
EC0-3-S6--t'\i2.3
15:27
18:22
25.240
53.61
450.0
17.83
2:. l lE-12
31.0
1.23
1.45E-!3
46.0
1.82
2.15E-13
S7
EC0-3-S7-M:
15~
18~
136.2
2940.1
3
8
0.(
4.23E-l
41.
03
1.95£-1
..... _.,, _ 520 -.··· _ .-·-78.
:.. .. ;.: __ ~~. 2.06 ,-:;-: .<::: 0.5
2.43E-l3
60.0 •· ,,. 238
2.81E--13
3.71E--l
150.<
l.l!
7.lJE-1:
I l -~-_:_· __ -_·. ~~~~-~l:bi~~ .. ; ~~ -0~-; ~~;~
I -!>----_-_. --_-_--_-_ .• _. ----_-_--_-_--_--_-__ ....... _____ ,,_ ________ ....., _ __,; ___ ~~---------+-----I.-5_7& ___ 12....,. __ 2_.06E-____ 14 ..... __ 7_.6_1_E--__ I::
·: ,:-pg 10.0
_pg/ciscL .--:.---0.54 -. lbs/hr. 6.76E-!4
25.0 12.0
0.18 0.42
1.34E--12 5.06E-14
•• -. #-•••• ·-:-_--::-:~·. ~--•'·-··-: ...... ~.-.. :~---~~ "t'" I :-_-.-~: ,~::.. -~---·•·-. ·--··-.. . . . -.,-. -. ---. 1=---=:::: Heptachlorobiphcnyl--:-:::-:-:pg.:. <.c..o.. 1.0 -· ~~3.8 < .. -~.~ 1.0 I.1 1 ,::~~-~;; ::21:=::=,=t~.~~~(~~ __ ··-:-~ :: ; ti<= s~;~_7:~: 1.::~ : · .. ~~i:: /n~~!
--13 < -.. ..:.1.0
_"::.
-~ 0.02 <'. 0.03 -..
I 1'_: __ ~i_f_:_· __ ~-· ~-~~:~~_.:_·} __ :-_· __ ;~_f_.~_:~-/-~-~ '2_~pg~ < · 1.0 < ___ -~ 1.0 .<~~-,,:_~:.--:·1.0 < :::-·::i.o : ____ =_.::;.·\.o <-~->-::..·1.0
• ---~ • .:--:.----
0
pg/~-< 0.05 < -~0.01 <-:_·:·.·-0.03 < -···0.01 < .:::.:... 0.04 < -· O.Ql
l.24E--13 < 4.22.E-15
I ;~,~~~'.;;; _-_~S,;:(~~--::it:=::::=~=:;:""'. ·" lbs/hr -< :--:. 6.76E-15 < · 5.37E-14 < 4 "'"E-15 < 437E-14 < 4.68E--15 < 4.76E-13 1-~\~ ~~iii~~\-;E-~~.::~ ~=-~i·-:to ~~--~~-=~--!~ ;~---.. 1.0 < -, · -_ 1.0 < 7u:,r ,i.o <---·-. 1.0
I t·~,::;;,,,;~,~~~ ~~-:~;::~ : ~ ;-;::~ ·_<~:-..c....---:-'-'-0.03 < · -., -0.01
<···· 4.22.E-15 < ·: 437&14 <.
. --·-~bi h...:._"·-~ • 1 . . . ~r·7, ..
< -Detection Limit
pg
pg/dscf
lbs/hr
<
<
<
1.0 <
0.05 <
6.76£-15 <
•1
•1
• Note: Gal flow rate for Location S6 provided by Eco Logic.
I
1.0 <
0.01 <
5.37E-14 <
1.0 <
0.03 <
4.22E--15 <
1.0 <
0.01 <
4.37E-14 <
-4.6&E-15 <
I.0 <
0.04 <
4.6&E-15 <
4.76E--13
1.01
0.01 ,
4.76c-13
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I J
I i
I I
I l-
1 [ _· .. ··:
____ -_:;.·.
I I -·-----------·.--
I -.7 -
l :.:._ :..:: I-·--~-I , _____ _
1--·---·-
I . I
I I
•1
•1
I
··--
.Run No.:
. ?ilJilJJling ID:
Date: ·· · .: .. ·.· :-..
Sample.Vol
.•Gas Flow:••·
TABLE 2-3. RUN 1 -DIOXINSIFURANS SUM.¼ARY -LOCATION S7
····•.1 ·
tc6.:1~s1.:M23 .: · ....
i~J~~~97 :: ·. ·•.·:··
··131:s3lrlscf · . -..
:••• : 55jfo •dscfrxi •<••·
PCDD (Dioxin) Isomers
2,3,7,8 TCDD 1.0 NTI
a Other TCDD 0.0 ND
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.5 1'H)
a Other PeCDD 0.0 ND
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.1 ND
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.1 ND
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.1 ND
a Other HxCDD 0.0 ND
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.01 ND
a Other HpCDD 0.0 ND
Total OCDD 0.001 ND
Sum (based on Total Isomers), pg 0.0
Rate, lbs/hr 0.0
Weighted Sum (based on Toxic Equivalents), pg
Wei ted Tox. E . Rate, lbs/hr
PCDF (Furan) Isome.rs
2,3,7,8 TCDF 0.1 ND
a Other TCDF 0.0 ND
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.05 ND
2.,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.5 ND
a Other PeCDF 0.0 ND
1,2.,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.1 ND
0.0 18
0.0 18
0.0 31
0.0 31
0.0 30
0.0 28
0.0 30
0.0 30
0.00 24
0.0 24
0.000 31
'. 0 · 43
. 0 45
... o 30
0 26
0 30
0 6.6
1,2.,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.1 ND 0 7.2
2.,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.1 ND :· 0 7.6
1,2.,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.1 ND ;. 0 9.7
-a Other HxCDF 0.0 ND · 0 9.7_
1,2..,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.01 ND . . 0 7
1,2.,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.01 ND ::-.: 0 8.1
a Other HpCDF 0.0 ND ·· 0 8.1
Total OCDF 0.001 ND , -· · 0 38
_ Sum (based on Total Isomers), pg 0
Rate, lbs/hr 0.0
·~-~Weighted Sum (based on Toxic Equivalents), pg ·· _ 0
Wei ta! Tox. E . Rate lbs/hr 0.0
• · -,o CFRPart 266, Appc,dixIX, Table 4.0.
• • -Unle.s.s noted olNrwt.s,e., all val=s ~ported are in pg.
••• ~ ~ection limits an: not r;rvcnfor ddected cong=r:r..
J
6
TAB-DIOX.WX:4 (f111Sfi1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -....
.-.-:.:--
I ':-
... ..
I
I
1·
I
TABLE 2-5. RUN 2 -DIOXLNS/FURANS SUMMARY -LOCATION S7
I Run No.: . :: __ :,2:.::-:::::..:-·.::·:•,..=..:.: ........ .
EC0-'2-S7~M23 · > · . Sampling ID: •
. Date:· . .· ... 3-iU:Oe:::97 < . . . .... _ .
. ·.Sampl/yolume:·:: ' .. \154;49] dscf . · .·.·· .. · .
.. ·. :< :. si.oo dscfm .· Gas Flow:· .
PCDD (Dioxin) Isomers
2,3,7,8 TCDD
a Other TCDD
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD
a Other PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD
a Other HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD
a Other HpCDD
Total OCDD
..
Sum (based on Total Isomers), pg
Rate, lbs/hr
Weighted Sum (based on Toxic Equivalents), pg
Weighted Tox.. E . Rate, lbs/hr
PCDF (Furan) Isomers
2,3,7,8 TCDF
a Other TCDF
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF
a '' Other PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF
a Other HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF
a Other HpCDF
Total OCDF
Sum (based on Total Isomers), pg
Rate, lbs/hr
Weighted Sum (based on Toxic Equivalents), pg
• --10 CFR Part 266, Appoidi:r IX. Table -I. 0.
-Uraless nolu.i otM~. all wzlut!S reported are in pg.
•• • -Detection limits are nol ~ for cktected congeners.
f .
1.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.01
0.0
0.001
0.1
0.0
0.05
0.5
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.01
0.01
0.0
0.001
s0)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0
0.0
0.0 20
0.0 20
0.0 28
0.0 28
0.0 19
0.0 18
0.0-19
0.0 19
0.00 16
0.0 16
o."ooo 17
0.0 59
0.0 59
0.00 35
0.0 30
0.0 (j 35
0.0 8.5
0.0 9.4-
0.0 9.9
0.0 13
0.0 13.0
0.00 7.4
0.00 8.6
0.0 8.6
0.000 24
TAB-DIOX.WK.4 rrTn9IV7
I
I l
I l
I l
I l
I l
I l
I l
I l
I l
I l
11
I I
I l;
1 t __
l -I
1I
11
1t
1l
TABLE Z-7. RUN 3 -DIOXINS/FUR.\.NS Sl.TM?Yf.ARY -LOCATION S7
:;:~i:~m: --._ -EC:o~J--s1-iii} ·-·.
Date: -_·• -. : 5--Jtmei97 ..
.sainp1~ v~1~~; < 136.28s ct;~r ·
G~Flow:·• ••· ·,_·· ·· • < '· /49:00 d.scfrn
PCDD (Dioxin) Isomers
2,3,7,8 TCDD
a Other TCDD
1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD
a Other PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD
a Other Hx CD D
l,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD
a Other HpCDD
Total OCDD
Sum (based on Total Isomers), pg
Rate, lbs/hr
Weighted Sum (based on Toxic Equivalents), pg
Weighted Tox. Eq. Rate, lbs/hr
PCDF (Furan) Isomers
2,3,7,8 TCDF
a Other TCD F
1.2-.3,7,8 PeCDF
2,3,♦,7,8 PeCDF
a Other PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF
1.2-,3,6,7,8 HxCDF
2.3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF
·a ---. Other HxCDF ·
1.2-,:3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF
1,2,:3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF
a -· Other HpCDF
Total OCDF
Sum (based on Total Isomers), pg
Rate, lbs/hr
.·\EPX }
·:•.·••···Torie
· : E:qui"< <Facto/*••·•
1.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.01
0.0
0.001
0.1
0.0
0.05
0.5
0.0
0.1
0.1
·-0.1
0.1
0.0
0.01
0.01
0.0
0.001
Weighted Sum (based on Toxic Equivalents), pg ,. •:
Wei ted Tox. E . Rate lbs/hr
• -,o CFR Part 266, Appctdi:r IX. Table -1.0.
• • -Unle_s.s NJled otJrc-wist!, all values reported are in pg.
••• -Dtttttction limits are net g/YC!for <Ulttctttd conge=rs.
a -Total~ not includtt s ci c l.so~rs resmted
10 ~
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0
0.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0
0.0
..
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.000
0.000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 . -
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.000
0.0
0.0
10
10
29
29
13
12
13
13
20
20
28
52
52
26
22
26
6.8
7.5
7.9
10
10
7.7
9.0
9.0
18
T A.B--OIQX. WK4 011-:9t7T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PCDD and PCDF TEQ Calculations
Product Gas and Exhaust Gas Samples
I PCDD/PCDF Concentrations -using Half Detection Limits in TEO Calculations
GasSa I mo1es 0.0283
I
I Run 1 -Product uas (::i6J Hun 1 -Stack uas (S7) I I-TEF Sample Vol: 18.613 dscf 1/2 DL TEO Sample Vol: 137.83 dscf 1/2 DL TEO
Analvte PQ oa/dscf nn -· ·-' -· nn oa/dscf nn/dsm3 or actual loa/dsm3)
2,3,7,8-I vUU 1 < 23 < 1.~;,o < 43.6 21 .8 21.817 < 18 < 0.131 < 4.6 2.3 2.3uti
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.5 < 29 < 1.558 < 55.0 27.5 13.754 < 31 < 0.225 < 7.9 4.0 1.985
I 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.1 < 25 < 1.343 < 47.4 23.7 2.371 < 30 < 0.218 < 7.7 3.8 0.384
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.1 < 23 < 1.236 < 43.6 21 .8 2.182 < 28 < 0.203 < 7.2 3.6 0.359
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.1 < 25 < 1.343 < 47.4 23.7 2.371 < 30 < 0.218 < 7.7 3.8 0.384
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01 < 14 < 0.752 < 26.6 13.3 0.133 < 24 < 0.174 < 6.1 3.1 0.031
Total OCDD 0.001 < 22 < 1.182 < 41 .7 20.9 0.021 < 31 < 0.225 < 7,9 4.0 0.004
I 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.1 < 32 < 1.719 < 60.7 30.4 3,035 < 43 < 0.312 < 11 .0 5.5 0.551
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0,05 < 28 < 1.504 < 53.1 26.6 1.328 < 30 < 0.218 < 7.7 3.8 0.192
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.5 < 24 < 1.289 < 45.5 22.8 11 .383 < 26 < 0.189 < 6.7 3.3 1.665
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 8.5 < 0.457 < 16.1 8.1 0.806 < 6.6 < 0.048 < 1.7 0.8 0.085
I 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 9.3 < 0.500 < 17.6 8.8 0.882 < 7.2 < 0.052 < 1.8 0.9 0.092
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 9,8 < 0.527 < 18.6 9.3 0.930 < 7.6 < 0.055 < 1.9 1.0 0.097
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.1 < 13 < 0.698 < 24.7 12.3 1.233 < 9.7 < 0.070 < 2.5 1.2 0.124
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 < 25 < 1,343 < 47.4 23.7 0.237 < 7 < 0.051 < 1.8 0.9 0.009
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01 < 29 < 1.558 < 55.0 27.5 0.275 < 8.1 < 0.059 < 2.1 1.0 0.010
I Total OCDF 0.001 < 24 < 1.289 < 45.5 22.8 0.023 < 38 < 0.276 < 9.7 4.9 0.005
TEO 63 8.3
I I-TEO 1/2 DL TEO
Anal te /dscf /dsm3 or actual /dsm3 /dscf /dsm3 or actual /dsm3
2,3,7,8-1 < 0.727 25.7 12.8 12.835 < 20 < 0.129 < 4.6 2.3 2.286
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.5 < 35 < 1.212 42.8 21.4 10.696 < 28 < 0.181 < 6.4 3.2 1.600
I 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.1 < 11 < 0.381 < 13.4 6.7 0.672 < 19 < 0.123 < 4.3 2.2 0.217
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.1 < 11 < 0.381 < 13.4 6.7 0.672 < 18 < 0.117 < 4.1 2.1 0.206
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.1 < 11 < 0.381 < 13.4 6.7 0.672 < 19 < 0.123 < 4.3 2.2 0.217
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01 < 16 < 0.554 < 19.6 9.8 0.098 < 16 < 0.104 < 3.7 1.8 0.018
I Total OCDD 0.001 < 26 < 0.900 < 31.8 15.9 0.016 < 17 < 0.110 < 3.9 1.9 0.002
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.1 < 30 < 1.039 < 36.7 18.3 1.834 < 59 < 0.382 < 13.5 6.7 0.674
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05 < 32 < 1.108 < 39.1 19.6 0.978 < 35 < 0.227 < 8.0 4.0 0.200
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 0.5 < 28 < 0.969 < 34.2 17.1 8.557 < 30 < 0.194 < 6.9 3.4 1.714
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 4.9 < 0.170 < 6.0 3.0 0.299 < 8.5 < 0.055 < 1.9 1.0 0.097
I 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 5.4 < 0.187 < 6.6 3.3 0.330 < 9.4 < 0.061 < 2.1 1.1 0.107
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 5.7 < 0.197 < 7.0 3.5 0.348 < 9.9 < 0.064 < 2.3 1.1 0.113
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.1 < 7.3 < 0.253 < 8.9 4.5 0.446 < 13 < 0.084 < 3.0 1.5 0.149
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 < 15 < 0.519 < 18.3 9.2 0.092 < 7.4 < 0.048 < 1.7 0.8 0.008
I 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01 < 18 < 0.623 < 22.0 11.0 0.110 < 8.6 < 0.056 < 2.0 1.0 0.010
Total OCDF 0.001 < 18 < 0.623 < 22.0 11 .0 0.011 < 24 < 0.155 < 5.5 2.7 0.003
TEO 39 7.6
I 11Arv31vte
Hun 3 -Product Gas (S6J Hun 3 -Stack Gas r::.11
I-TEF SamoleVol: 25.24 dscf 1/2 DL TEO SamoleVol: 136.28 dscf 1/2 DL TEO
PC oa/dscf oa/dsm3 or actual lnn/dsm3\ nn nn/dscf nn/dsm3 or actual loa/dsm3)
~.;,,r,8-lvUU 1 < 26 < 1.030 < 36.4 18.2 18.187 < 10 < 0.073 < 2.6 1.3 1.295
I 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 0.5 < 25 < 0.990 < 35.0 17.5 8.744 < 29 < 0.213 < 7.5 3.8 1.878
1,2,3.4,7,8-HxCDD 0.1 < 29 < 1.149 < 40.6 20.3 2.029 < 13 < 0.095 < 3.4 1.7 0.168
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 0.1 < 27 < 1.070 < 37.8 18.9 1.889 < 12 < 0.088 < 3.1 1.6 0.155
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 0.1 < 29 < 1.149 < 40.6 20.3 2.029 < 13 < 0.095 < 3.4 1.7 0.168
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 0.01 < 20 < 0.792 < 28.0 14.0 0.140 < 20 < 0.147 < 5.2 2.6 0.026
I Total OCDD 0.001 < 74 < 2.932 < 103.5 51.8 0.052 < 28 < 0.205 < 7.3 3.6 0.004
2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.1 < 30 < 1.189 < 42.0 21 .0 2.098 < 52 < 0.382 < 13.5 6.7 0.674
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 0.05 < 34 < 1.347 < 47.6 23.8 1.189 < 26 < 0.191 < 6.7 3.4 0.168
2,3.4,7,8-PeCDF 0.5 < 29 < 1.149 < 40.6 20.3 10.143 < 22 < 0.161 < 5.7 2.9 1.425
1,2,3.4,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 7.3 < 0.289 < 10.2 5.1 0.511 < 6.8 < 0.050 < 1.8 0.9 0.088 I 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 4.9 < 0.194 < 6.9 3.4 0.343 < 7.5 < 0.055 < 1.9 1.0 0.097
2,3.4,6,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 5.4 < 0.214 < 7.6 3.8 0.378 < 7.9 < 0.058 < 2.0 1.0 0.102
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 0.1 < 5.7 < 0.226 < 8.0 4.0 0.399 < 10 < 0.073 < 2.6 1.3 0.130
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 0.01 < 6.9 < 0.273 < 9.7 4.8 0.048 < 7.7 < 0.056 < 2.0 1.0 0.010
I 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 0.01 < 8 < 0.317 < 11 .2 5.6 0.056 < 9 < 0.066 < 2.3 1.2 0.012
Total OCDF 0.001 < 15 < 0.594 < 21 .0 10.5 0.010 < 18 < 0.132 < 4.7 2.3 0.002
TEO 48 , 6.4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PCDD and PCDF TEQ Calculations
Solid and Liquid Samples
-- -- -PCOO/f Oat• and TEO Calculatlona (TEO Calculatons fot non -detect values calculated uslnQ 1/2 DL) TU Water Stank 1/2 DL Of actual Compound 1-TEF lJ>i!IL -ppq) value 2,3,7 ,8-TCOO I < 30 1.5 1,2,3,7,8-PCOO 0 5 < 4.1 2.05 1,2.3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.1 < 54 2.7 1,2,3,8,7,8-HxCDO 0.1 < 5.0 2 5 1,2,3,7,8,0-HxCDO 0.1 < 4.0 2.4 1,2,3,4,8,7 ,8-H PCDD 0.01 < 70 3.5 OCOD 0.00 I < 0.3 4.15 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.1 < 20 I 3 1,2,3,7.8-PCDF 0.05 < 3.2 1.0 2,3,4,7,8-PCDF 0.5 < 3.1 1.55 1,2,3.4,7,e-H11:CDF 0 I < 4 5 2 25 1,2,3.0.7.8-HxCDF 0.1 < 3.7 1.85 2,3,4,8,7 ,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 4.5 2.25 1,2.3,7,8,0-H11:COF 0.1 < 5.0 2.5 1.2,3.4,8,7,8-HPCDF 0 01 < 4.1 2.05 1,2,3,4,7,8,0-HPCDF 0.01 < 0.4 3 2 OCOF 0.001 27.7 27.7 I-TEO 5.3 TotatTCDD < 3.0 Total PeCOD < '·' Total HxCDD < 50 Total HpCOD < 70 Total TCOF < 2.0 Total PeCDF < 3.1 Total H:«.CDF < .. Total HoCDF < 5.0 TU Waler Blank 1/2 DL o, actual Compound 1-TEF (poll -epq) value 2,3,7,e-TCDD I < 20 1.4 1,2,3,7,8-PCDD 0.5 < ... 2.2 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 0.1 < 4.5 2 25 1,2,3,8,7 .8-HxCDD 0.1 < 3.5 I 75 1,2.3,7,8,0-HxCDD 0.1 < ,., 2.05 1,2,3,4,8,7,8-HPCDD 0.01 ,.o ... OCDD 0.00 t 24 0 24.0 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.1 < 2 I 1.05 1,2,3.7 ,8-PCDF 0.05 < 3.1 1.55 2,3,4.7,8-PCDF 0.5 < 3.1 1.55 1,2,3,4.7.8-HxCDF 0.1 < 3.5 1.75 1,2,3.15.7,8-HxCDF 0.1 < 2.7 1.35 2.3,4,15,7,8-HxCDF 0.1 • 5 45 t.2,3,7.8,0-H11:CDF 0.1 < 4 4 22 1.2,3,4.8,7,8-HPCDF 0.01 o• ... 1 ,2,3,4,7 .8.0-H PCDF 0.01 < 5.5 2.75 OCDF 0.001 8.0 0 I-TEO 5.2 Total TCDD < 2.0 Total PeCOD < .. Total HxCOD < 4.0 Total HpCOD 4.0 TolalTCOF < 2.1 Total PeCOF < 3.1 Total HxCOF 4.5 Jotal HD~D~ _ O.O B = FOund in Laboratory Method Blank PR= Peak is Poorly AuoNed -amount is lkely overutmated E = Estimated Maximum Possible Concentraton • -Estimeted Maximum Possible Concentre1on = 3.4 ppq - --- -Water Blan. NC-R2-S2-1 1/2 OL R2S21 NC-AI-S2-1 1/2 DL TEO Cole Of actual TEO Cole OJ actual (pg/L-ppq) value (pg/L-ppq) value 1.5 < O.O 3.45 3.45 < 0.3 3. 15 1.025 < O.O 4.0 2.4 < 8.0 4.45 0.27 < 13.5 8.75 0,875 < 12.0 0 0.25 < 12.3 8.15 0.815 < 10.0 5.45 0.24 < 11.0 5.05 0.505 < 10.8 5.3 0.035 < 17.2 0.0 o.088 < 14.2 7.1 0.004 15 < 22.3 11.15 0.01115 < 18.1 0.05 0.13 < 50 2.0 0.20 < 5.1 2.55 0.08 < o .• 3.45 0. 1725 < 0.5 3.25 0.775 < 0.7 3.35 1.875 < 0.3 3.15 0.225 < O.O 4.8 0.48 < 8.8 4.4 0.185 < 7.7 3,85 0.385 < 7.0 3.5 0.225 < •.o 4.0 0.48 < 8.7 4.35 0.25 < 10.8 5.3 0.53 < 0.7 4.85 0.0205 < 0.2 4.0 0.048 < 8.2 4.1 0.032 < 14.4 7.2 0.072 < 12.8 0.4 0.0277 < 10.2 O.O o.0008 < 15.8 7.8 12.0 10.0 < o• < 0.3 < O.O < 8.0 < 12.5 < 11.1 < 17.2 < 14.2 < 5.0 < 5.1 < 0.8 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 8.4 < 11.3 < 10.0 Water Blanl NC-A3-S2-1 1/2 DL R3S2 t NC-A3-S2-2 1/2 DL TEO Cale or actual TEO Cale or actual (pg/L -ppq) value (pg/L-ppq) value 1.4 < 1.3 0.85 0.155 < 1.3 0.155 1.1 < 2.4 1.2 0,15 < 2.5 1.25 0.225 < 2.0 1.4 0.14 < 3.1 1.55 0.175 < 2.2 I.I 0,11 < 2.4 1.2 0.205 < 2.5 1.25 0.125 < 2.8 1.4 0.0415 < 2.3 1. 15 0.0 t 15 < 3.5 1.75 0.0240 e 13.5 13.5 0.0135 1'/B 14.7 14.7 0.105 < 1.0 0.5 0.05 < 1.0 05 0.0775 < 1.7 0.85 0.0-425 < 1.0 0.8 0.775 < 1.7 0.85 0.425 < 1.0 0.8 0.175 < , .. 0.05 0.005 < 2.0 I 0.135 < 1.4 0.7 0.07 <'. 1.5 0.75 0 45 < 20 I 0.1 B 0.2 0.2 0.22 < 2.3 1. 15 0.115 < 2.5 1.25 0.0150 < 2.1 1.05 0.0105 < 2.7 1.35 0.0275 < 20 1.45 0.0 145 < 3.7 1.85 0.008 <'. 2.0 1.3 0.0013 < 4.5 2.25 2.0 3.2 E 3.7 < 1.3 < 2.4 < 25 < 25 < 20 < 2.3 < 3.5 < 1.0 < 1.0 E 2.0 < 1.0 < 1.0 B 0.2 < 2.4 < 3.1 -- -- - -- - -R1S21 NC-R1-S2-2 1/2 DL R1S22 NC-Rt-$4 1/2 DL R!S4 TU Soid Blank 1/2 DL Sold Blk TEO Cale or actual TEO Cole Of actual TEO Cole or actual TEO Cale (pg/L-ppq) value (pg/L-ppq) value log/a -ppt) value 3.15 < 3.0 1.0 1.8 < 2.0 1.3 1.3 < 22.2 11.t 11.1 2.225 < 5.3 2.85 1.325 < 4.2 2.1 1.05 < 30 15 7.5 0.8 < o .• 3.45 0.345 < 5.2 2.0 0.28 < 35 17.5 1.75 0.545 < 0.3 3, 15 0.315 < 4.0 2.4 0.24 < 27 . .f 13.7 1.37 0.53 < 0.1 3.05 0.305 < 4.0 2.3 0.23 < 31.5 15.75 1.575 0.071 < 0.7 4.35 0.0435 < 8.4 4.2 0.042 < 43.1 21.55 0.2155 0.0000!5 < 10.5 5.25 0.00525 < 14.2 7.1 0.0071 < 88.2 43. 1 0 0431 0.255 < 3.1 1.55 0.155 < 2.0 I 0.1 < 10. I 0.55 0,055 0.1825 < 3.7 1.es 0.0025 < 3.0 1.5 0.075 < 27.4 13.7 0.885 1.575 < 3.0 1.0 0,0 < 2.0 1.45 0.725 < 27.5 13.75 8,875 0.44 < 5.5 2.75 0.275 < 3.7 1.85 0.185 < 27.8 13.0 1.30 0.35 < 4.4 22 0.22 < 3.0 1.5 o. 15 < 20.0 10.4 1.04 0.435 < 5.5 2.75 0.275 E 5.5 5.5 0.55 < 20.0 14.05 1.405 0.485 < 0.1 3.05 0.305 < 4.1 2.05 0.205 < 34.1 17.05 1.705 0.041 < 4.7 2.35 0.0235 < 4.4 2.2 0.022 < 34 17 0.17 0.084 < 7.4 3.7 0.037 < 0.8 3.4 0.034 < 47.2 23.0 0.238 0.0078 < .. , 4.55 0.00455 < 12.2 0.1 o.0081 < 88.2 33.1 0.033 I 0.4 5.2 30.1 < 3.0 < 2.0 < 22.2 < 5.3 < 4.2 < 30 < 0.4 < 4.0 < 31 < 0.7 < 0.4 < 43.1 < 3.1 < 2.0 < 10. I < 3.0 < 2.0 < 27.4 < 5.3 E 5.5 < 27.2 < 5.0 < 5.4 < 30.5 R3S22 NC-R3-S4 1/2 DL R3S4 Solid Blank 1/2 DL Sid Blank NC-R3-SI 1/2 DL A3S I TEO Cale o, actual TEO Cale or actual TEO Cak:: Run 3 Input soil ot actual TEO Cole (pg/L-ppq) value (pg/g -ppt) value (pg/g -pp!) value 0.155 < I.I 0.55 0.55 < 1.0 o.• 0.0 < 1.4 0.7 0.7 0.825 < 20 1 0.5 < 2.1 1.05 0.525 < 1.0 0.0 0.4 0.155 < 2.4 1.2 0.12 < 2.4 1.2 0.12 < 2.1 1.05 0.105 0.12 < ,.. 0.05 0.005 < 2.2 I.I 0.11 < ,.. 0.05 0.005 0.14 < 2.2 I.I 0.11 < 2.1 1.05 0.105 < 1.0 o.• 0,00 0.0175 < 2.2 1.1 0.011 < 2.0 1.3 0.013 35.1 35, 1 0.3!51 0.0147 < 3.3 1.155 0.00185 < 3.0 1.0 0.0018 530.0 530 0.!530 0.05 < 00 0.45 0.045 < 1.7 0.85 0.085 0.0 0 0.0 0.04 < 1.4 0.7 0,035 < 1.0 0.0 0.045 """ 32 3.2 0.115 0.4 < 1.4 0.7 0.35 <'. 1.7 0.85 0.425 02 0 2 4.1 0.1 < 1.0 0.0 0.08 < 2.1 1.0!5 0. 10!5 P'R 08.1 08.1 0.81 0.07!5 < 1.2 0.0 o.oe < 1.7 0.85 0.085 18.7 115.7 1.157 0.82 B 4.7 4.7 0.47 2.0 2 0.2 B 7.3 7.3 0.73 0.125 <'. 2.0 I 0.1 < 2.3 1. 15 0.115 < 1.0 00 0.00 0.0 135 < ,.. 0.05 0.0005 < 1.0 0.8 0.008 88.1 88.1 0.881 0.0185 <'. 2.7 1.35 0.0 135 < 2.5 1.25 0,0125 40.2 40.2 0.402 0.00225 < 2.5 1.25 0.00 125 < 3.1 1.55 0.00155 320 320 0.32 2.0 2.• 21.3 2.1 < 1.8 < 1.4 < 2.0 < 2.1 < 10 < 2.1 < 2.2 2.5 < 2.2 < 2.0 11.e < 0.0 < 1.7 18.3 < 1.4 < 1.7 57.1 4.7 2.0 105.0 < 2.2 < 1.0 225.0 •
-----PCDO/F Dllt• •nd TEO Calcul■tlon (TEO Calcul11lons for non-detect val NC-R2-S 1 Run 2 Input Son Compound 1-TEF \e1!!_0 -ppl) 2.3,7,8-TCOD 1 < 12 0 1.2.3,7,9-PCDD 0.5 eo., 1.2,3,4,7,e-HxCOO 0 1 92.5 t,2,3.e.7,e-HxCDO 0.1 04 1,2,3,7,8,0-HxCDO 0.1 eJ.e 1.2,3,4,9,7,9-HPCDD 0.01 540 OCDD 0.001 5000 2,3,7.e-TCOF 0.1 75,0 1,2,3,7 ,8-PCOF 0.05 05 2,3,4.7,8-PCOF 0.5 154 1.2,3,4.7.8-H1tCDF 0.1 n. 1070 1.2.3,e.7.e-H1tCDF 0.1 231 2,3,C,15,7,e-HxCOF 0.1 ,eo 1,2,3,7.8.0-H,cCOF 0.1 e 1.e 1,2,3.C,8,7,8-HPCOF 0.01 1320 1.2.3,4,7,8,0-HPCOF 0.01 0 15 OCDF 0.001 3020 I-TEO 341.8 TotallCOO < 12.0 Total PeCOD 150.4 Tot11I HxCOO 250 Total HpCOO 1850 Tot11I TCO F 150 Tot11I PeCOF 505 Total HxCOF 2230 Total HoCOF 3080 ·---N-C-A3-S5 Run 3 Output Compound /-TEF (oa/o -pp1) 2,3.7,8-TCOO 1 < 0.3 1,2,3.7,8-PCOO 0.!5 < 0.3 1.2.3.4,7,8-Hr.COO 0.1 < 03 1.2,3,8.7,8-HxCOO 0.1 < 02 1,2.3,7 ,8,0-HxCOO 0.1 < 0 2 1,2,3,4,15,7,8-HPCOO 0.01 05 OCOD o.oo 1 B 7.4 2,3.7 .e-TCDF 0.1 0.!55 1,2,3,7.8-PCDF 0.05 < 03 2,3,4,7,8-PCDF 0.!5 < 03 1.2,3,4,7,8-HxCOF 0.1 < 0.2 1,2.3,8,7,8-HxCOF 0.1 < 0.2 2,3,4,8,7,8-H1tCOF 0.1 o.81 1,2.3,7,8,0-H1tCOF 0.1 < 03 1,2,3,4,15,7,8-HPCOF 0.0 t < 02 1,2,3,4,7.8,0-HPCOF 0.01 < 03 OCDF 0.001 2 3 I-TEO 0 51 Toll!!TCOO < 03 To!l!I PeCOO < 0.3 Total HxCOO < 03 Tola I HpCOD 1.0 TotalTCDF 0.55 To!\!I PeCOF < 03 Total HxCOF o.e 1 Total HnCOF < 0.3 B = Found in-LabOJalO/"yMethod Blar PR = Peak is Poorly Resotved -amo E = Estimeted Ml!ximum Possible Co • -Estimated Muimum Possible Cor 1/2 DL or actual value 0 45 00 4 92.5 04 03 0 540 5000 759 05 154 1070 231 '"" o,e 1320 015 3020 1/2 DL Of actufll value 0, 15 0.15 0.1!5 0 1 0 1 0 52 ,. 0 55 0 15 0 15 0 I 0 1 001 0.15 0 1 0 15 2 3 --R2S 1 NC-R2-S5 TEO Cale Aun 2 Output (oa/a -Doll e.•5 38.8 30.2 102 9.25 102 0.4 177 030 100 5.48 100 5.0 307 7 .50 < 1e.e 4.75 E 202 77 100 107 200 23.1 213 18.8 220 8.18 105 13.2 250 e.15 187 3.02 20◄ 380.7 38.8 102 555 100 E 34.15 100 032 437 A3S4 Water Blank TEO Cak: (pail -nnq) 0.15 < 2.4 0.075 < 3 0 0.015 < 4 1 0 01 < 3.2 0.01 < 3.7 0 0052 < 5.0 0.0074 10.1 0.055 < 1. o oon < 2. 0.075 < 2.4 0.01 < 3.0 0.01 < 2.3 0.081 4.0 0015 < 3.7 0.001 < 3 3 00015 < 4.0 0 0023 < 0 ... E 2 1 < 3.0 < 3 0 < 5.0 < 1.0 < 2 4 4.0 < 3.0 --- - --- - ----1/2 DL R2S5 NC-RI-SI 1/2 DL R1S1 NC-AI-S5 1/2 DL A1S5 NC-R2-S2-2 1/2 DL or actual TEO Cole Run 1 Input Soil or actual TEO Cole Run 1 Output or actual TEO Cale or actual TEO Cale value (pa/a -ppll value (POiO -ppl) value (pg/L -ppq) value 38.9 31!1.8 < 15 7.5 7.5 < 0.3 0.15 0.15 < 3.1 1.55 1.55 102 ., < 20.0 10.45 5.225 < 0.4 0.2 0.1 < 0.0 3.4 1.7 102 11!1.2 < 24.5 12.25 1.225 < 0.3 0.15 0.015 < 0.7 4.85 0.495 177 17.7 < 10.2 0.0 o.oe < 0.3 0.15 0.015 < 7.0 3.05 0,305 100 uu, < 22.1 11.05 1.105 < 0.3 0.15 0.015 < 0.5 4.25 0.425 100 uu, 253 253 2.53 < 0.3 0.15 0.0015 < 12.e 0.4 0.094 307 0.387 3840 3840 3.84 B 2.7 2.7 0.0027 234 234 0.234 0.4 O.OC 75.1 75.1 7.!51 < 0.2 0.1 0.01 < 2.C 1.2 0.12 202 10.1 31.4 31.4 1.57 < 0.3 0.15 0.007!5 < 4 2 0.1 180 04.5 122 122 01 < 0.3 0.1!5 0.075 < 4.1 2.0!5 1.025 200 20.0 PR 1720 1720 172 < 0.2 0.1 0.01 < 5.2 2.0 o.2e 213 21.3 200 200 20.8 < 0.2 0.1 0.01 < 4 2 0.2 228 22.8 PA 157 157 1!5.7 0.153 0.153 0.0153 < 54 2.7 0.27 105 18,!5 < 10.3 0,155 0.015!5 < 0.3 0.15 0.015 < 0.1 3.05 0 305 250 2.5 2150 2150 21.5 < 0.3 0.15 0.0015 < 7.4 3.7 0.037 187 1.87 050 050 0.50 < 0.3 0.15 0.0015 < 10.7 5.35 0.0535 204 0.2154 5700 5700 5.7 < 0.4 0.2 0.0002 < 22.0 11.45 0.01145 347.3 0.40 7.2 < 15 < 0.3 < 3.1 < 20.0 < 04 < o.e E 24.8 < 0.3 < 0.0 520 < 0.3 < 12.8 102 < 0.2 < 2.4 003 < 0.3 < 4.1 3330 0.153 < 5.1 4870 < 0.3 < 0.7 1/2 DL Wat Bink NC-R2-S4 1/2 DL R2S4 Of actual TEO Cale or actual TEO Cale value (po/L-ppq) value 1.2 1.2 < 3.0 1.0 1.8 1.0 0.0 < 5.0 2.5 t.25 2.05 0.205 < 5.0 2.0 0.28 1.0 0.18 < 4.4 2.2 0.22 1.85 0.185 < 5.0 2.5 0.25 2.5 0.025 < 5.0 2.05 0.0205 10.1 0.0101 E/11 0.3 0.3 0,0083 0.0 0.00 < 2.0 ... 0.14 1.2 0.015 < 3.5 1.7!5 0.087!5 1.2 0,8 < 3.5 1.7!5 0.875 1.5 0.15 < 3.0 1.0 0.18 1.1!5 0.115 < 2.7 1.3!5 0.135 4.0 0.415 B 4.1 4.1 0.41 1.85 0.185 < 4.4 2.2 0.22 1.155 0,01155 < 4.0 2 0.02 2.3 0.023 < 5.5 2.75 0.0275 2.0 0.0028 < 0.0 3 0.003 5.0 < 3.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 5.0 < 2.0 < 3.5 B 4. 1 < 4.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Summary of PCDD/F Concentrations in
Liquid, Solid and Gas Samples
I
I
I Table 1 SUMMARY OF DIOXIN DATA -RUN 1
rre-carbon J'ost-carbon
Input Soil Treated Soil Scrubber Wate Scrubber WatcJ Product Gas &baust Gas
I ComDound {Df!il!) {CK!/1!) {f>l!ll.) (pg/L) {pg/dsm3) {CK!/dsm3)
2,3,7,8-TCDD < 15 < 0.3 < 3.6 < 2.6 < 43.633 < 4.6
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD < 20.9 < 0.4 < 5.3 < 4.2 < 55 < 7.9
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD < 24.5 < 0.3 < 6.9 < 5.2 < 47.4 < 7.7
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD < 19.2 < 0.3 < 6.3 < 4.8 < 43.6 < 7.2
I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD < 22.1 < 0.3 < 6.1 < 4.6 < 47.4 < 7.7
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 253 < 0.3 < 8.7 < 8.4 < 26.6 < 6.1
OCDD 3640 2.7 < 10.5 < 14.2 < 41.7 < 7.9
2.3,7,8-TCDF 75.1 < 0.2 < 3.1 < 2.0 < 60.7 < 11
I 1.2,3,7,8-PeCDF 31.4 < 0.3 < 3.7 < 3.0 < 53.1 < 7.7
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 122 < 0.3 < 3.6 < 2.9 < 45.5 < 6.7
1,2.3.4.7,8-HxCDF 1720 < 0.2 < 5.5 < 3.7 < 16.1 < 1.7
1.2.3,6. 7,8-HxCDF 296 < 0.2 < 4.4 < 3.0 < 17.6 < 1.8
2.3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF 157 0.63 < 5.5 (( 5.5 < 18.6 < 1.9
I 1.2.3,7.8,9-HxCDF < 19.3 < 0.3 < 6.1 < 4.1 < 24.7 < 2.5
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 2150 < 0.3 < 4.7 < 4.4 < 47.4 < 1.8
1,2,3,4.7,8.9-HpCDF 959 < 0.3 < 7.4 < 6.8 < 55 < 2.1
OCDF 5700 < 0.4 < 9.1 < 12.2 < 45 .5 < 9.7
I I-1EQ 347.3 05 6.4 4.9 63 8.3
Total TCDD < 15 < 0.3 < 3.6 < 2.6
TotalPeCDD < 20.9 < 0.4 < 5.3 < 4.2
TotalHxCDD 24.6 < 0.3 < 6.4 < 4.8
I
TotalHpCDD 520 < 0.3 < 8.7 < 8.4
TotalTCDF 102 < 0.2 < 3.1 < 2.0
TotalPeCDF 903 < 0.3 < 3.6 < 2.9
TotalHxCDF 3330 0.63 < 5.3 (( 5.5
TotalHoCDF 4870 < 0.3 < 5.8 < 5.4
I B = Found m Laborato Method Blank ry
PR = Peak is Poorly Resolved -amount is likely overestimated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Table 2 SUMMARY OF DIOXIN DATA -RUN 2
Pre-Carbon Post-Carbon
Input Soil l'reated Soil Scrubber Wate Scrubber Wate Product Gas Exhaust Gas
I Comoound {Pl!.IJO IDS?li! > {Pf!,/L) {Pf!,/L) {Pf!.ldsm3) {Pf!,/dsm3)
2,3,7,8-TCDD < 12.9 38.8 < 3.1 < 3.6 < 25.7 < 4.6
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 60.4 182 < 6.8 < 5.0 < 42.8 < 6.4
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 82.5 182 < 9.7 < 5.6 < 13.4 < 4.3
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 84 177 < 7.9 < 4.4 < 13.4 < 4.1
I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 83.6 196 < 8.5 < 5.0 < 13.4 < 4.3
1,2.3.4,6,7,8-HpCDD 546 166 < 12.8 < 5.9 < 19.6 < 3.7
OCDD 5900 367 234 D 6.3 < 31.8 < 3.9
2,3,7,8-TCDF 75.9 < 18.8 < 2.4 < 2.8 < 36.7 < 13.5
I 1,2.3,7,8-PeCDF 95 202 < 4 < 3.5 < 39.1 < 8
2,3.4,7,8-PeCDF 154 189 < 4.1 < 3.5 < 34.2 < 6.9 1.2.3.4,7,8-HxCDF 1070 206 < 5.2 < 3.6 < 6 < 1.9 1,2,3.6,7,8-HxCDF 231 213 < 4 < 2.7 < 6.6 < 2.1 2,3,4,6.7.8-HxCDF 188 228 < 5.4 D 4.1 < 7 < 2.3
I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 81.8 185 < 6.1 < 4.4 < 8.9 < 3
1,2,3.4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1320 250 < 7.4 < 4.0 < 18.3 < 1.7
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 615 187 < 10.7 < 5.5 < 22 < 2
OCDF 3020 264 < 22.9 < 6.0 < 22 < 5.5
I l-1EQ 341.8 380.7 7.2 5.9 39 7.6
Total TCDD < 12.9 38.8 < 3.1 < 3.6
Total PeCDD 60.4 182 < 6.8 < 5.0
Total H.xCDD 250 555 < 8.6 < 5.0
I TotalHpCDD 1650 166 < 12.8 < 5.9
TotalTCDF 156 34.6 < 2.4 < 2.8
Tota!PeCDF 595 189 < 4.1 < 3.5
Total H.xCDF 2230 832 < 5.1 4.1
Total HoCDF 3080 437 < 8.7 < 4.6
I B = Found m Laborato Method Blank ry
PR = Peak is Poorly Resolved -amount is likely overestimated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Table 3 SUMMARY OF DIOXIN DATA -RUN 3
Pre-Carbon Post-Carbon
Input Soil Treated Soil Scrubber Wale Scrubber Wale Product Gas Ezhaust Gas
I Compound {PldKl {PldKl {PldLl fPldL> {Plddsm3) (lJl!!dsm3)
2,3,7,8-TCDD < 1.4 < 0.3 < 1.3 < I.I < 36.4 < 2.6
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD < 1.6 < 0.3 < 2.5 < 2.0 < 35.0 < 7.5
1,2,3.4,7,8-HxCDD < 2.1 < 0.3 < 3.1 < 2.4 < 40.6 < 3.4
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD < 1.9 < 0.2 < 2.4 < 1.9 < 37.8 < 3.1
I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD < 1.8 < 0.2 < 2.8 < 2.2 < 40.6 < 3.4
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 35.1 0.5 < 3.5 < 2.2 < 28.0 < 5.2
OCDD 539.0 7.4 (( 14.7 < 3.3 < 103.5 < 7.3
2,3,7,8-TCDF 8.0 0.55 < 1.0 < 0.9 < 42.0 < 13.5
I 1,2.3,7,8-PeCDF PR 3.2 < 0.3 < 1.6 < 1.4 < 47.6 < 6.7
2,3.4,7,8 -PeCDF 8.2 < 0.3 < 1.6 < 1.4 < 40.6 < 5.7
1,2,3.4,7,8-HxCDF PR 98.1 < 0.2 < 2.0 < 1.6 < 10.2 < 1.8
1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDF 16.7 < 0.2 < 1.5 < 1.2 < 6.9 < 1.9
2,3.4,6. 7,8-HxCDF B 7.3 0.61 6.2 4.7 < 7.6 < 2.0
I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF < 1.8 < 0.3 < 2.5 < 2.0 < 8.0 < 2.6
1.2.3.4.6.7,8-HpCDF 88.1 < 0.2 < 2.7 < 1.9 < 9.7 < 2.0
1.2,3.4, 7,8,9-HpCDF 49.2 < 0.3 < 3.7 < 2.7 < 11.2 < 2.3
OCDF 320 2.3 < 4.5 < 2.5 < 21.0 < 4.7
I l-1EQ 21.3 0.51 3.2 2.5 48 6.4
TotalTCDD < 1.4 < 0.3 < 1.3 2.1
Total PeCDD < 1.6 < 0.3 < 2.5 < 2.0
Total HxCDD 2.5 < 0.3 < 2.8 < 2.1
I Total HpCDD 71.6 1.0 < 3.5 < 2.2
Total TCDF 16.3 0.55 < 1.0 < 0.9
Total PeCDF 57.1 < 0.3 < 1.6 < 1.4
TotalHxCDF 195.0 0.61 6.2 4.7
Total HpCDF 225.0 < 0.3 < 3.1 < 2.2
I B = Found m Laboratory Method Blank
PR = Peak is Poorly Resolved -amount is likely overestimated
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PCB Gas Concentration Calculations
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
PCB Concentrations
G S I as amo es
Analvte
Monochlorobiphenyl
DiCB
TriCB
TetraCB
PentaCB
HexaCB
HeptaCB
OctaCB
NonaCB
DecaCB
Total PCB
Analvte
Monochlorobiphenyl
DiCB
TriCB
TetraCB
PentaCB
HexaCB
HeptaCB
OctaCB
NonaCB
DecaCB
Total PCB
Analvte
Monochlorobiphenyl
DiCB
TriCB
TetraCB
PentaCB
HexaCB
HeptaCB
OctaCB
NonaCB
DecaCB
Total PCB
0.02832
Run 1 -Product Gas (S6)
nn/dscf nn/dsm3 nq/dsm3
21 .49 758.8 0.7588
4.57 161 .4 0.1614
25.79 910.7 0.9107
19.88 702.0 0.7020
9.13 322.4 0.3224
0.54 19.1 0.0191
ND (0.05) ND (1.8) ND (0.0018)
ND (0.05) ND (1 .8) ND (0.0018)
ND (0.05) ND (1 .8) ND (0.0018)
ND (0.05) ND (1 .8) ND (0.0018)
81 .4 2874.3 2.8743
Run 2 -Product Gas (S6)
oa/dscf oo/dsm3 no/dsm3
15.23 537.8 0.5378
1.8 63.6 0.0636
7.27 256.7 0.2567
9.69 342.2 0.3422
5.89 208.0 0.2080
0.42 14.8 0.0148
ND (0.03) ND (1 .1} ND (0.0011)
ND (0.03) ND (1.1) ND (0.0011)
ND (0.03) ND (1 .1) ND (0.0011)
ND (0.03) ND (1 .1) ND (0.0011)
40.3 1423.0 1.4230
Run 3 -Product Gas (S6)
oa/dscf pq/dsm3 nq/dsm3
17.83 629.6 0.6296
1.23 43.4 0.0434
1.82 64.3 0.0643
2.06 72.7 0.0727
2.38 84.0 0.0840
0.17 6.0 0.0060
ND (0.04) ND (1 .4) ND (0.0014)
ND (0.04) ND (1 .4) ND (0 .0014)
ND (0.04) ND (1 .4) ND (0 .0014)
ND (0.04) ND (1 .4) ND (0 .0014)
25.49 900.1 0.9001
Run 1 -Stack Gas (S7)
oa/dscf oa/dsm3 no/dsm3
0.07 2.5 0.0025
0.28 9.9 0.0099
1.52 53.7 0.0537
1.52 53.7 0.0537
1.09 38.5 0.0385
0.1 8 6.4 0.0064
0.02 0.7 0.0007
ND (0.01) ND (0.4) ND (0.0004)
ND (0.01) ND (0.4) ND (0.0004)
ND (0.01) ND (0.4) ND (0.0004)
4.68 165.3 0.1653
Run 2 -Stack Gas (S7)
oa/dscf oa/dsm3 no/dsm3
0.05 1.8 0.0018
0.16 5.6 0.0056
0.84 29.7 0.0297
0.97 34.3 0.0343
1.55 54.7 0.0547
0.23 8.1 0.0081
0.02 0.7 0.0007
ND (0.01) ND (0.4) ND (0.0004)
ND (0.01) ND (0.4) ND (0.0004)
ND (0.01) ND (0.4) ND (0.0004)
3.82 134.9 0.1349
Run 3 -Stack Gas (S7)
oa/dscf nn/dsm3 nq/dsm3
0.02 0.7 0.0007
0.07 2.5 0.0025
0.30 10.6 0.0106
0.57 20.1 0.0201
1.1 38.8 0.0388
0.12 4.2 0.0042
0.01 0.4 0.0004
ND (0.01) ND (0.4) ND (0.0004)
ND (0.01) ND (0.4) ND (0.0004)
ND (0.01) ND (0.4) ND (0.0004)
2.19 77.3 0.0773
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Summary of PCB Concentrations in
Liquid, Solid and Filter Samples
- -- -- - --- -- - -- - -PCB ConcenlTations (/,g,\. -ppb) Ljg~id Sa1'!'4'les ___ _ __ ....... ___ _ _ Scrubber Water Scr'-'>ber Water Scrwber Water Untreated Scr'-'>be Treated Scr'-'>ber Untreated Scn.bbe Treated Scr'-'>ber Untreated Scrubbe Treated Scrubber -an (R1/R2) -~Ian (R3) --------~-----r Nc=~~-1 -NC=l12-=~1 Nv-A3-S2-1 Nv-A1-S2-2 Nv-A1 -S4 Nv-A2-S2-2 NC-R2-S4 ~~JY!'! Pre-RJ!n 1 Pre-Run2 '"" Pre-Run3 WaterR1 WalerR1 WaterR2 ,.,c WaterR2 WaterR3 ..,c WaterR3 I Total Moiioca-··---o.o5 --0.02 ,... 0.02 0.28 < 0.003 0.26 '·" < 0.002 o.31 '·" < 0.002 < 0.003 < 0.001 , TotalDiCB 0.01 0.009 0.007 0.10 < 0.003 0.09 ,., < 0.002 0.08 '·" < 0.002 < 0.003 < 0.001 TotalTriCB < 0.002 < 0.003 < 0.003 E 0.008 < 0.003 0.01 ,.oz < 0.002 E 0.01 < 0.002 < 0.003 < 0.002 Total TetraCB < 0.003 < 0.004 < 0.004 < 0.003 < 0.004 < 0.002 < 0.003 < 0.003 < 0.003 < 0.005 < 0.002 TotalPentaCB < 0.004 < 0.006 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.006 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.004 < 0.005 < 0.006 < 0.003 Total HexaCB < 0.004 < 0.006 < 0.004 < 0.006 < 0.006 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.004 < 0.004 < 0.006 < 0.003 Total HeptaCB < 0.003 < 0.005 < 0.004 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.004 < 0.004 < 0.003 < 0.004 < 0.005 < 0.003 Total OctaCB < 0.004 < 0.006 < 0.004 < 0.005 < 0.006 < 0.004 < 0.005 < 0.004 < 0.004 < 0.006 < 0.003 Total NonaCB < 0.004 < 0.006 < 0.005 < 0.006 < 0.006 < 0.005 < 0.006 < 0.004 < 0.005 < 0.006 < 0.003 DecaCB < 0.005 < 0.008 < 0.006 < 0.007 < 0.008 < 0.006 < 0.007 < 0.005 < 0.006 < 0.008 < 0.004 Total PCB I 0.07 I 0.03 I TotalPCB+EWC 0.07 0.04 MPc aria E = Est1maiea Maximum Possible Concentraiion PC8 ConcenlTations (ng/g -ppb) Soil Samples TotalTriCB Total TetraCB Total PentaCB Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB 1NC-::R1-Sl !Jk,trealed Soil R 1 1.1 337 3220 5730 21750 131380 83450 16320 717 < 0.6 -Nc=m=ss Treated Soil R1 < OT < 02 < 03 < 0.4 < 05 < 05 < 04 < 0.5 < 05 < 06 0.03 0.03 Untreated Soil R2 14.2 543 5400 8970 23590 117790 74900 15090 654 < 0.4 0.38 0.39 Treated Soil R2 < 02 < 02 < 02 < 03 < 05 < 04 < 03 < 04 < 04 < 05 t-0 (0.008) t-0 (0.00 Untreated Soil R3 9.7 265 2780 5490 19160 96210 63200 13390 601 11.5 0.41 0.47 Treated Soil A3 < 02 < 02 < 02 < 03 < 05 < 04 < 03 < 04 < 04 < 05 < < < < < < < < < < t-0 (0.007) t-0 (0.00 ~2 02 02 03 04 04 04 04 05 06 < < < < < < < < < 0.39 0.42 02 02 02 03 04 04 03 04 04 05 Total PCB I 262910 I t-0 (0.6) 246940 t-0 (0.5) 201100 t-0 (0.5) t-0 (0.6) t-0 (0.5) TotalPCB+EWC 281670 t-0 (0.6 261950 t-0 0.5 217630 t-0 0.5 t-0 0.6 t-0 0.5 EMl5c ana E-= Esl1malecl Maximum Possible Coriceritrat,on PCB ConcenlTations (ng/g -ppb) Filler Samples 7 Nc=Rl~-l l NC-::R,-~~ -~:..R2-S3-l c=R2-S3-~~_lyte Scrubber 1, R1 Scrubb~r 2 R1 Scrt.bber 1 R2 Scrubber 2 R2 Scnbber 1 R3 _,.,,uuu"', "" n, n, "" TolalfvlorioCS--744 -84.9 ---1350 228-1370 • -~ ------Total DiCB 671 46 2530 208 2060 86.9 Total TriCB 1030 35.1 2220 114 2800 46.8 Total Tetra CB 580 22 1310 82.5 1470 48.2 TotalPentaCB 927 31.7 1740 124 1850 76.5 Total HexaCB 870 97.6 1640 436 1250 366 Total HeptaCB 196 32.5 381 206 222 180 Total OctaCB 15.4 2.9 22.6 27.9 17.3 26 Total NonaCB 4 < 0.9 < 1.1 < 1.2 < 2.4 < 0.8 DecaCB < 1.5 < 1.1 < 1.4 < 1.4 < 2.9 < 0.9 < < < < < < < < < Total PCB I 5030 I 353 TotalPCB+EWC 6~_0-_._..L. ___ 424 11190 I 1430 I 11030 I 974 I 0.2 --~2~60 . 1530 15960 1080 0.2 !:MPC ~ Es!iniaied Maximum Possible Concentraflon . < < < < < < < < < < 0.1 0.2 0.2 t-0 (0.2) t-0 (0.2 t-0 (0.006) t-0 (0.00 t-0 (0.008) t-0 (0.00 t-0 (0.004) t-0 (0.004