The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNCD980602163_19970801_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_Phase I Pilot Scale Test Report - Detoxification of Contaminated Soils Utilizing BCD-OCRI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PHASE I -PILOT SCALE TEST REPORT Detoxification of Contaminated Soils Utilizing Base Catalyzed Decomposition (BCD) Warren County, North Carolina Prepared by: ETG Environmental, Inc. 16 Hagerty Boulevard West Chester, PA 19382 Submitted to: State of North Carolina Department of Environment Health and Natural Resources Division of Waste Management Contract No. N7022 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................... i 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1 1.1 Background 1.2 Test Program Objectives 2.0 TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION ..................................... 4 3.0 TEST PROGRAM ................................................. 6 3.1 Technical Approach 3.2 Pilot Scale System Description 3.3 Test Program Summary 4.0 TEST RESULTS ................................................. 13 4.1 Soil Testing 4.2 Condensate Treatment 4.3 Air Monitoring and Modeling 4.4 Environment, Safety Performance, and Reliability 4.5 Treatment Effectiveness 5.0 TECHNICAL DISCUSSIONS- FULL SCALE PROCESS CONSIDERATIONS ........................ 19 6.0 FULL SCALE TREATMENT ....................................... 21 6.1 Batch Vacuum System 6.2 Continuous System 6.3 BCD Treatment 6.4 Material Handling and Preparation 6.5 Water Treatment 6.6 Capabilities for Full Scale Treatment 7.0 FULL SCALE TREATMENT ECONOMICS .......................... 28 APPENDIX A-TEST DATA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill Executive Summary ETG Environmental, Inc. (ETG) has performed a pilot scale test on PCB contaminated soil from the Warren County, NC landfill utilizing ETG's patented Therm-O-Detox® indirect heat thermal desorption system with off-gas condensing in conjunction with the USEP A patented, ETG licensed Base Catalyzed Decomposition (BCD) detoxification process. One (1) optimization and three (3) performance test runs were conducted in ETG's West Chester, PA offices. Extensive air monitoring was performed during the three (3) performance runs. A condensate study on the aqueous phase utilizing granular activated carbon (GAC) was also performed. PCBs in the soil were reduced to less than 3 parts per billion (ppb) in all four (4) runs. Initial PCB concentrations ranged from 258 to 853 parts per million (ppm). Removal efficiencies in the soil ranged from 99.9997 to 100%. Dioxin-TEQ concentrations in the treated soil ranged from Oto 2.96 parts per trillion (ppt) with an average of 0.91 ppt. Initial dioxin concentrations ranged from 8.4 -11.7 ppb total dioxins and 147 -238 ppt dioxin TEQ. Removal efficiencies ranged from 98 - 100%. VOCs in the treated soil were very low (ppb levels) and were all several orders of magnitude below Universal Treatment Standards (UTS) for non-wastewater materials. PCBs and dioxin TEQ concentrations in the aqueous phase condensate were significantly reduced by GAC treatment. As described in the report, ETG has proposed a more extensive water treatment system including UV oxidation for full scale processing. Liquid phase BCD produced non-detect (ppb range) PCBs in the residual organic phase. ETG Environmental, Inc. August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill Air monitoring results indicated extremely low levels of discharges of contaminants at the stack. Air modeling results indicated property line levels of contaminants below the preliminary target levels established in the RFP (5.0 x 10-s ug/dscm for dioxin TEQ and 8 x lQ-4 ug/dscm for PCBs). Thus, the feasibility of the BCD process was successfully demonstrated. No dewatering of contaminated soils is anticipated to be required during the full scale detoxification processing. A full scale budgetary estimate of $23.4 MM ($390 per wet ton based upon 60,000 tons) is presented based on the success of the pilot study. A cost reduction of up to 35% (into the $15 MM or $250/ton range) can be achieved by increasing the soil treatment standards. These costs are for a "turn-key" scope of work including excavation, material handling and preparation, soil processing, BCD (liquid phase) processing, water treatment, soil and water verification analysis, and backfilling of treated soil. ETG Environmental, Inc. II August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background The State of North Carolina owns and maintains a closed landfill located on a 142-acre tract ofland located just off State Road 1604 in Warren County, approximately 50 miles north of Raleigh. This landfill ( capped and closed in 1983) is permitted under the Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA). This landfill is vinyl and clay lined and contains approximately 40,000 cubic yards of soils (24 feet thick) contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The average PCB concentration of these landfilled soils is 300 to 350 ppm, primarily a mixture similar to Arochlor 1260. The containment area or landfill cell is enclosed by a fence occupying approximately 3.8 acres. The state has established a Working Group including independent science advisors to assist the state to evaluate and implement appropriate and feasible technologies to safely and cost- effectively detoxify the landfill materials. The Working Group has determined that Base Catalyzed Decomposition (BCD) and Gas Phase Chemical Reduction are technologies which can achieve these objectives. ETG Environmental, Inc. (ETG), as a BCD technology provider, formed a team with ICF Kaiser International, Inc. (ICF) and submitted a Proposal for Phase I (bench/pilot scale testing on PCB soil from Warren County utilizing BCD detoxification) and Phase II (preliminary remedial design of the full scale BCD detoxification system) services in response to the RFP. ETG was subsequently awarded a contract by the State to perform Phase I pilot scale testing on representative samples of PCB contaminated soil from the Warren County landfill. ETG Environmental, Inc._ August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill ETG is a technology based hazardous waste remediation and processing firm with approximately 40 years of operating experience. For over ten years, ETG has been developing expertise in the thermal desorption and chemical dechlorination (USEP A patented, ETG licensed Base Catalyzed Decomposition -BCD -process) technology areas. ETG has extensive project experience utilizing thermal desorption and BCD on full scale applications on high hazard waste sites, including PCBs and dioxins/furans. ETG and its affiliated companies have over 250 employees with annual revenues of approximately $60 million. ETG has performed for over 1000 clients including Fortune 500 companies, service agencies, and federal, state, and local government agencies. The testing activities were performed in West Chester, PA (suburban Philadelphia) which is also corporate headquarters for ETG. 1.2 Test Program Objectives The objectives of the Phase I pilot scale testing program for BCD detoxification of PCB contaminated soils at the Warren County Landfill are as follows: 1. Provide data to the Working Group to evaluate the feasibility of BCD for full scale detoxification of the PCB landfill. Feasibility determination will include safety, processing rate, cost and reduction in long term potential for environmental releases from residuals from the detoxification process. 2. Provide data from multiple test runs to allow evaluation of solid and liquid phase BCD for the purposes of determining destruction of PCBs from solid, liquid and air streams. ETG Environmental, Inc. 2 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 3. Evaluate the ability of the BCD process to meet performance criteria for treated solids and air emissions, as follows: Treated solids: 20 ppb for total PCBs 1 ppt for dioxin TEQ Air emissions: 8 x 10-4 micrograms per cubic meter for PCBs 5 x 1 o-s micrograms per cubic meter for dioxin TEQ 4. Provide data to allow for preparation of preliminary budgetary cost estimates by ETG for full scale detoxification of the PCB landfill. 5. Provide data to allow for preparation of Phase II conceptual preliminary design of the full scale BCD detoxification system. The testing program as described in Section 3.0 will describe how these objectives were accomplished during the Phase I soil detoxification. ETG Environmental, Inc. 3 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 2.0 Technology Description ETG has performed Phase I pilot scale testing utilizing the patented Therm-O-Detox® indirect heat thermal desorption system with off-gas condensing in conjunction with the USEP A patented, ETG licensed Based Catalyzed Decomposition (BCD) process for detoxification of PCB contaminated soil at the Warren County Landfill. ETG's Therm-O-Detox® System incorporates a unique thermal desorption process which combines indirect heat (up to 1000°F) with a vacuum (as deep as 25-27" Hg) and operates in a batch or continuous mode to cost effectively thermally desorb and detoxify a wide range of low to high boiling point organic compounds from soils, sediments, or sludges. Applications include PCBs, dioxins, furans, pesticides/herbicides, wood treating compounds such as pentachlorophenol (PCP) and creosote, coal tar, chlorinated solvents, and oily sludges. The Therm-O-Detox® system was used in conjunction with the BCD chemical dechlorination process to provide complete chemical destruction of the PCBs and other chlorinated materials present at Warren County. The BCD process was invented by the USEPA's National Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL) and has been further developed by ETG, working in collaboration with USEP A and other institutional and industrial providers of hazardous waste treatment services. ETG has performed numerous full scale remediation projects involving high hazard chlorinated contaminants utilizing the Therm-O-Detox/BCD process. ETG utilizes the reagent assisted (solid phase BCD) Therm-O-Detox system to initially detoxify and physically separate the organic contaminants from the contaminated matrix. ETG Environmental, Inc. 4 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill After the organics are partially detoxified ( dechlorinated) by solid phase BCD and separated from the soil, they are condensed into the liquid phase. Chemical destruction/detoxification of the condensed organics is then completed by the performance of liquid phase BCD in a liquid tank reactor (LTR). The BCD process (solid and liquid phase) is effectively a catalytic transfer hydrogenation process, in which chlorine atoms present on chlorinated molecules (i.e. PCBs) are removed and replaced by hydrogen atoms, thus chemically destroying/detoxifying the chlorinated compound. Solid phase BCD employs a sodium or potassium based proprietary reagent which replaces chlorine atoms with hydrogen on the chlorinated molecule, resulting in formation of a non- chlorinated molecule plus sodium or potassium chloride (NaCl or KCl). The overall liquid phase process is represented by the chemical reaction: Acceptor -Cl + NaOH + Donor -H Catalysts + Acceptor -H + NaCl + H10 or 600°-650°F or KOH KC/ In the present case, the Acceptor -Cl molecules are the polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (dioxins) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (furans), which are contained in the contaminated soil. While there are several different combinations of reagents used in the BCD process, all of these utilize a basic reagent such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH) sometimes in combination with liquid carriers/reagents and other catalytic materials which are proprietary to the USEP A. ETG Environmental, Inc. 5 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 3.0 Test Program 3.1 Technical Approach The purpose of the Pilot Scale testing is to provide preliminary technical data to allow for preparation of a remedial design/remedial action plan for the full-scale detoxification of the Warren County Landfill. The Pilot Scale unit, using a five gallon thermal reactor, is a simulation of the full scale Therm-O-Detox Unit described in the previous section and provides detailed information to evaluate the full scale application and feasibility of the BCD process. The raw waste supplied to ETG was analyzed for physical characteristics including moisture content and material handling properties, as well as chemical characteristics including mono- through deca congeners of PCB's, dioxins/furans, and VOC's as specified in the contract. Four runs of the material were performed in the pilot unit. The first run's purpose was to optimize the proposed treatment parameters to ensure a treated material that achieved the preliminary remediation standards. Three additional runs were performed under these optimized conditions to demonstrate the consistency of the technology. Condensate was collected from each run and sampled for PCB's, dioxins/furans, and VOC's. A treatability study using granular activated carbon was performed on the composited condensate. To ensure that the air emission performance goals were met, a flameless thermal oxidation unit was installed after the condensers. Continuous emission monitoring and air sampling was performed on the off-gas from the thermal oxidizer. ETG Environmental, Inc. 6 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 3.2 Pilot Scale System Description The pilot study was performed in our laboratory located in the West Chester, PA office. The Therm-O-Detox Unit is operated in the pilot study room, a specially-designed hazardous material work area having a steel floor and sheet metal walls. A decontamination area isolates the work area from other facility areas. Contaminated soils received from the Warren County Landfill were stored in a steel pan adjacent to the pilot study room. 3.2.1 Therm-O-Detox Unit Description The equipment used for the Pilot Study consisted of a batch system replicated from ETG's full-scale batch vacuum thermal desorption system. The pilot unit's process flow diagram is presented as Figure 1; a plan view of the unit with major components labeled is presented in Figure 2. The indirect-heated desorber vessel has an internal diameter of 17 inches and a depth of 24 inches. The vessel is heated with a propane burner supplied with fuel by an adjacent propane cylinder. There is no contact between the heat source and the contaminated material. The heat exchange occurs via four, three-inch steel tubes welded within the drum at 90° angles to each other. Non-contact exhaust gas from the burner is discharged from a six inch stack on top of the insulated heating chamber. The vessel rotates at approximately 1 rpm. Vapors are drawn from the front of the vessel under vacuum and passed though three condensers. Condenser 1 utilizes non-contact tap water for cooling while condensers 2 and 3 utilize recirculating, non-contact chilled water. Condensate is collected in three (3), steel 3.5 gallon tanks. Non-condensable vapors proceed to a flameless thermal oxidization unit to polish the off-gas prior to discharge to the atmosphere. The ETG Environmental, Inc. 7 August, 1997 -------------------~ Cp 1DIPERA1UIE CNJCE <p VACWM flNJCE ~ CHECK VALVE ~ VALVE WOii LINE - - -NON--<XlNTACT C0ClJNG IA1ER -. -. -. -alNTACT COOLWC: llllBI SMIPI.D DMIN If: 1M IIIQ(:5-t-f7 llflJUII lEMPERKI\JRE 1HERIW. ll£SORPIDI (IITID) ll.'t1ICII 'z C:\EIC\PII.DUJIG ETG ENVIRON~ENTAL, INC. 16 HAGERTY II.Vil, WEST CHE51ER, PA 19382 I t RESllUES w POT~lER--►---1 r·-·~·-·-·-·-·1 :I . I I _J . ,-------! I L--·-·-·-·---, I I i i I I v. ~, ... t~ ! I -&~ S£AL WAlER TNIK I . I un. I I I I <XNlENSATE TNIK 2 _ _ _ _ _ _J I I I L______ I J,111 L 0tlWII IIAlBI ~ _j ®i -7 ::_p__ ' ----ro~ L___ 2 CHllll WA"lER TANK AIR 5Aif'l.l«l UICATICII [DjilEMSAJE TANK l Off-GAS T!i£RIIN.. OXIDIZER NO SCALE ~ PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM MTI1l PILOT UNIT -------------------I I I I I I I I ,---------------J -~ □ J CONDENSATE TANKS □ IJMN Br: MAI( llAll: IH!4--H IIMSl0N f 0 C:\ll'IIG\ET0\1.1 IU __ J>../IDfG I I I ETG ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 16 HAGERTY BLVD, WEST CHESTER, PA 19382 MAIN DISCONNECT ELECTRICAL PANEL CONDENSER J 'ACUUM PUMP SEAL WATER TANK VACUUM P\JM SEAL WAlER -------~·----CHILLED WATER TANK □,RECIRCULATION I PUMP RUM DRIVE & MOTOR t -------PROP MOTOR ~ BURNER INL ...--r-+-------+--+------+-----.-. .... CONDENSER 1 &: 2 (2 IS BELOW 1) VN'OR RECOVERY Ur£ b---1 f -.. N'PR0lCIMATE SCAl£ IN FEET MTTD VESSEL 0 COMBUSTION EXHAUST STACK EDGE OF SKID flGURE 2 EQUIPMENT LAYOUT MTTD PILOT UNIT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill flameless oxidizer description follows in Section 3 .2.2. A water-sealed vacuum pump provides the driving force for vapor movement through the pilot unit. It is capable of delivering 55 cfm at 28 inches Hg. The pump is driven by a three-phase 460 volt motor. A seal water tank and seal water cooler supply the vacuum pump's cooling requirements. Potable water is the cooling media for the seal water system. The vacuum pump, a small water recirculation pump in the chilled water tank, and the drum drive motor are the only electrical components on the system. All are controlled from the electrical panel. The main disconnect for the power supply is located adjacent to the electrical panel. Numerous temperature and vacuum gauges on the vapor lines were used to monitor the process variables throughout the system. These are located on Figure 1. As shown in Figure 2, the major components rest on a 8' x 5' skid. The condensate tanks sit on a 2' x 3' steel platform connected to the skid. The propane tank is located adjacent to the skid. The skid sits inside of a 24' x 16' x 6" deep steel pan to contain any spillage from the system. 3.2.2 Flameless Thermal Oxidizer Description The regenerative thermal oxidizer is a flameless unit which converts contaminated gas streams into carbon dioxide and water. The oxidizer is a four feet in diameter, reinforced, insulated chamber filled with high temperature ceramic gravel. The oxidizer works by passing off-gas through the heated ceramic bed. The gas temperature rapidly increases until the ignition point is reached in the middle of the bed (approximately 1800 °F). The abundant oxygen content of the influent vapor and air mixture allows complete oxidization to occur. Oxidization by-products (CO2 and water) are exhausted to the stack. Located above and below the bed are gas duct plenums to allow the process ETG Environmental, Inc. 8 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill gas flow to be reversed through the bed. This reversal prevents the inlet and exhaust sides of the bed from becoming too cool or too hot. The gas flow is controlled by a pneumatic poppet valve mechanism which automatically changes the direction of the gas flow at regular intervals. Integral, programed controls monitor the operation and provides for unattended operation. When the oxidizer is used as a polishing unit, as in this pilot test, the supplemental heat energy required for complete oxidization is supplied by natural gas. A puff chamber works in conjunction with the oxidizer. The puff chamber is timed to capture a volume of vapors during the flow direction reversal of the oxidizer. This vapor is then returned to the inlet of the thermal oxidizer. The addition of the puff chamber increases the overall efficiency of the oxidizer. 3.3 Test Program Summary 3.3.1 Raw Waste Characterization Testing began with characterization of the four (4) raw waste samples received from the Warren County Landfill. Each sample container was weighed and soil samples were collected for submission to Triangle Laboratories for PCB, Dioxin, and VOC analysis. Additional samples were collected for physical characterization performed in our laboratory. Samples were tested for PCBs via Method 8080, percent solids, bulk density, and compacted density. A sample from waste sample WC 2-4 was analyzed for fixed solids. A Photo Ionization Detector (PID) measured total organics in the head space above a waste sample. Results from the characterization analysis are contained in Table 4-1 . These analyses were used to establish the initial process parameters for the optimization test. ETG Environmental, Inc. 9 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 3.3.2 Optimization Test The first run of the Therm-O-Detox Unit was performed on sample WC 2-4 to optimize the operating conditions to the waste. A 900°F operating temperature, a ten (10) hour run time, and a two (2) percent addition of BCD reagent (sodium bicarbonate) were chosen as the optimization parameters. Steady-state operation at 880-900 °F soil temperature was obtained three (3) hours into the run and maintained for seven (7) hours. During operation, trained technicians monitored the unit and recorded its progress. Observations of operating temperature, vacuum conditions, and thermal desorber operation were recorded twice per hour. Total organics, oxygen, carbon monoxide concentrations, and LEL readings were taken in the pilot unit room throughout the run. Real-time decibel and PCB concentrations in the work area were recorded. At the completion of the run, treated soil samples were submitted to Triangle Laboratories for quick tum-around analysis for PCB's and Dioxin. Treated soil had a pebble-like consistency and a red-orange color. A condensate sample was additionally sent to the BCD Group in Ohio (affiliated with USEP A) for PCB and Dioxin/Furan testing. The condensate had a musty odor and a rusty yellow appearance. No oil sheen was present. Off-gas was processed through the flameless thermal oxidizer. Bed temperatures were maintained through the run. FID monitoring of the stack gases during the run showed no organic concentrations above pre-test background levels. Analytical results indicated no detectable concentrations of PCB and Dioxin in the treated soils and condensate, indicating successful solid phase BCD detoxification of PCBs and ETG Environmental, Inc. IO August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill dioxins/furans. 3.3.3 Test Runs Based on the success of the optimization run, three (3) test runs were performed with the same soil temperature profile, vacuum conditions, and percent additive. Treated soils and condensate from each run was similar in appearance to those described in the optimization run. Treated soils were submitted to Triangle Laboratory for PCB, Dioxin, and VOC analysis. Condensate was retained for treatability testing. ETG utilized Waterford Compliance Group to perform the air emission monitoring and compliance testing. Continuous emissions monitoring was performed during all three test runs. Volumetric flow rate, temperature, and humidity were monitored and emissions samples collected for analysis of PCB's, Dioxins, VOCs and particulate matter. The accumulated stack test data was imported into a screening level dispersion model to determine full scale operations air quality impacts at the boundary. 3.3.4 Condensate Treatability Testing The purpose of the treatability testing was to determine the effectiveness of granular activated carbon (GAC) in removing PCB, Dioxin, and VOCs from the aqueous condensate collected during the pilot testing. To make this determination, pre-and post-carbon treatment condensate samples were submitted to Triangle Laboratories for analysis. Testing was performed on the aqueous condensate collected from Condensate Tanks #1, #2, and #3 of the pilot unit, during the four soil desorption runs. Due to the small volume of condensate collected from the runs, all condensate was composited for the testing. The total available ETG Environmental, Inc. 11 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill condensate was approximately 17 .5 pounds. Laboratory Methods 680, 8290, and 8240 were employed for the analysis. ETG Environmental, Inc. 12 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR 4.0 Test Results 4.1 Soil Testing Warren County Landfill All four raw waste samples were analyzed for physical characteristics in our laboratory and total PCBs by an outside laboratory utilizing Method 8080 to determine the processing conditions for the optimization test. Based on the test results summarized in Table 4-1, sample WC 2-4 was selected for the optimization test due to its having the highest PCB concentration in the waste sample. Total PCB contents varied from 262 to 465 parts per million (ppm) in this preliminary screening test. All PCBs were PCB-1248 (4-14%) and PCB-1260 (86-96%). The raw waste samples were subjected to complete congener specific PCB analysis as performed by Triangle Laboratories (Method 680), as well as dioxin/furan analysis (Method 8290) and VOC analysis (Method 8240). Results are shown in Table 4-2, 4-3 and 4-4 respectively. Solids content and compacted density for all samples were within a very tight range. Therefore, each sample was used for each performance test run without blending or homogenization with other samples. At the completion of the optimization run, treated soil samples were sent to Triangle Labs for Dioxin/Furan, PCB, and VOC analyses. PCB and Dioxin/Furan were analyzed on a 5-day turnaround basis for the optimization run to ensure that data was available for performance tests within a week of the optimization test. As shown in table 4-5, PCB concentrations of all congeners from the optimization test sample WC 2-4 are non-detect with detection limits in 0.1-0.2 parts per billion (ppb) range. Dioxin and Furan concentrations in the treated sample are extremely low. The equivalent Dioxin concentration (2 ,3, 7,8 TCDD TEQ) as shown in Table 4-6 is calculated to be 0.63 parts per trillion ETG Environmental, Inc. 13 August, 1997 Table 4-1 Physical Characteristics and Total PCB's of Raw Waste I I I I I I I Sample ID Percent Density Density Color PIO Total PCB's Solids (Bulk) (Compacted) Reading WC1-3 90.89% 110.9 140.13 lb./cu.ft. Light Brown w/ 1.2 ppm lb./cu.ft. Red Clay WC1-4 91 .13% 109.3 142.3 Light Brown w/ ND Red Balls WC2-3 90.36% 106.9 142.9 Dark Brown ND WC2-4** 90.34% 98.7 142.5 Dark Brown ND I ** A Fixed Solids analysis was performed to determine moisture and potential volatile solids content of the soil. I I I I I I I I I I I The following data was collected: Percent Solids: Percent Moisture: Percent Fixed Solids: Percent Volatile Solids: 90.75% 9.25% (Wet Weight Basis) 87.55% 3.53% (ppm) 262 443 267 465 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 4-2 WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY PCB DATA SUMMARY-RAW SOIL WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 Analytes ug/kg (ppb) ug/kg (ppb) ug/kg (ppb) ug/kg (ppb) Total MonoCB 28 44 6 3 Total DiCB 2,900 3,100 205 118 Total TriCB 19,940 20,850 2,060 764 Total TetraCB 19,590 25,090 4,260 1,970 Total PentaCB 60,880 71,890 30,600 20,010 Total HexaCB 256,250 419,610 189,500 129,450 Total OctraCB 155,970 261,390 121,220 87,770 Total NonaCB 30,050 49,050 23,400 18,080 Deca CB 1,400 2,260 1,030 768 19 32 26 21 Total PCB 547,027 853,316 372,307 258,954 *Data analyzed by Triangle Laboratories, Inc. Soil Blank ug/kg (ppb) ND (0.09) ND (0.09) ND(0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.2) ND(0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND(0.2) ND I I TABLE 4-3 WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY I PCDDs/PCDFs DATA SUMMARY-RAW SOIL I WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 Soil Analytes ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) Blank I 2378-TCDD ND ND ND ND ND (0.3) 12378-PeCDD ND ND ND ND ND (0.6) I 1234 78-HxCDD ND ND ND ND ND (0.5) 123678-HxCDD 2.2 2.3 4.5 ND ND (0.4) 123789-HxCDD 1.8 1.6 2.1 ND ND (0.5) I 1234678-HpCDD 14.8 18.1 145 32.8 ND (0.8) OCDD 506 515 2,710 1,300 ND (1.5) I 2378-TCDF 108 125 46.1 49.7 ND (0.3) 12378-PeCDF 29.7 33.8 12.7 14.4 ND (0.5) 23478-PeCDF 114 123 53.5 58 ND (0.5) I 1234 78-HxCDF 1120 1230 826 923 ND (0.5) 123678-HxCDF 126 136 111 135 ND (0.4) 234678-HxCDF 50.9 48.8 31 .6 34 ND (0.6) I 123789-HxCDF 6.3 5.9 3.6 2.8 ND (0.6) 1234678-HpCDF 821 864 648 704 ND (0.6) 1234 789-HpCDF 547 584 354 337 ND (0.9) I OCDF 4050 5050 2930 2910 ND (1 .2) 2378-TEQ 218 238 147 159 0 I I Total TCDD 12.3 1.3 0.95 1.4 ND (0.3) Total PeCDD 31 .3 35.4 16.8 17.5 ND (0 .6) Total HxCDD 9.2 7.7 13.5 4.9 ND (0.5) I Total HpCDD 14.9 35 323 78.3 ND (0.8) OCDD 506 515 2,710 1,300 ND (1 .5) I Total TCDF 465 459 171 189 ND (0.3) Total PeCDF 763 844 470 504 ND (0.5) Total HxCDF 1990 2180 1510 1720 ND (0.5) I Total HpCDF 2350 2600 1680 1680 ND (0.7) OCDF 4050 5050 2930 2910 ND (1 .2) I Total PCDD/F 10,192 11,727 9,825 8,405 " 0 \.. I I I I TABLE 4-4 I WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY voe DATA SUMMARY-RAW SOIL I WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 UTS Non-WW Analytes ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg Chloromethane ND(0.3) ND(0.24) 6.04 ND(0.24) 30 ,000 I Vinyl Chloride ND(0.28) ND(0.22) ND(0.21) ND(0.22) Bromomethane ND(0.31) ND(0.25) ND(0.24) ND(0.25) I Chloroethane ND(0.33) ND(0.26) ND(0.25) ND(0.26) Trichlorofluoromethane ND(0.11) ND(0.09) ND(0.08) ND(0.09) 1 , 1-Dich loroethene ND(0.22) ND(0.18) ND(0.17) ND(0.18) I Carbon disulfide 0.37 ND(0.05) ND(0.05) ND(0.05) 4,800 Acetone 17.42 ND(0.18) 4.1 ND(0.18) 160,000 Methylene chloride 3.53 2.6 2.55 2.45 30,000 I trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND(0.16) ND(0.13) ND(0.12) ND(0.13) 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND(0.1) ND(0.08) ND(0.07) ND(0.08) cis-1,2-Dichloroethane ND(0.16) ND(0.13) ND(0.12) ND(0.13) I Chloroform 0.31 ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) 6,000 1,2-Dichloroethane ND(0.12) ND(0.1) ND(0.09) ND(0.1) Vinyl acetate ND(0.09) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) I 2-Butanone 64.43 ND(0.79) ND(0.75) ND(0.79) 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND(0.12) ND(0.09) ND(0.08) ND(0.09) Carbon tetrachloride 5.76 ND(0.13) 2.59 3.5 6,000 I Benzene 1.47 1.47 1.6 1.18 10,000 Trichloroethene ND(0.37) ND(0.26) ND(0.25) ND(0.27) I 1,2-Dichloropropane ND(0.22) ND(0.16) ND(0.15) ND(0.16) Bromodichloromethane ND(0.12) ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.08) cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND(0.13) ND(0.09) ND(0.09) ND(0.09) I trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ND(0.15) ND(0.11) ND(0.1) ND(0.11) 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane ND(0.18) 0ND(.13) ND(0.12) ND(0.13) Dibromoch loromethane ND(0.27) ND(0.19) ND(0.18) ND(0.19) I Bromoform ND(0.35) ND(0.25) ND(0.24) ND(0.25) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND(0.12) ND(0.09) ND(0.09) ND(0.09) Toluene 2.63 ND(0.06) 2.3 2.13 10,000 I Tetrachloroethene 1.75 ND(0.25) 1.21 ND(0.26) 6,000 2-Hexanone ND(0.16) ND(0.11) ND(0.11) ND(0.12) Chlorobenzene 27.64 28.29 2.02 2.55 6,000 I Ethylbenzene ND(0.17) ND(0.12) ND(0.12) ND(0.13) m-/p-Xylene 0.77 ND(.09) 0.33 ND(0.09) a-Xylene ND(0.14) ND(0.1) ND(0.1) ND(0.1) 30,000 I Styrene ND(0.08) ND(0.05) ND(0.05) ND(0.06) 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND(0.09) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill (ppt) which is lower than the targeted preliminary remediation goal of 1 ppt. Based on these results, three (3) test runs with the same process parameters were performed. PCBs -PCB analysis data for the raw waste samples is summarized in Table 4-2. These results indicate a range of PCB's from 259-853 parts per million (ppm) which differed from results obtained utilizing Method 8080 (Table 4-1 ). This difference may be caused by the low mobility of PCB molecules. However, these readings are all consistent with previous data recorded by NCDEHNR, and the inconsistency in the data did not affect the pilot testing performed by ETG. All PCB concentrations remaining in the treated soils from all four (4) test runs were either non-detect or less than 2.55 ppb, as illustrated in Table 4-5. Utilizing EPA Method 680 ensured that the detection limits were below the 20 ppb level, which represents the preliminary soil remediation goal for PCBs for full scale detoxification of the landfill. Thus, the solid phase BCD process was extremely successful in meeting the PCB soil remediation goals for the project. The feasibility of the process (as well as treatment consistency) was proven over all four (4) test runs. Removal efficiency for PCBs ranged in the soil from 99.9997 to 100%. Dioxins/Furans -As shown in the bottom of Table 4-3, total dioxins/furans were found to be present in the raw waste samples with levels ranging from 8.4 -11.7 ppb. The majority of the TEQ concentration contaminants were from octachlorinated dioxins (OCDD) and furans, with 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorinated dioxin (TCDD) toxicity equivalent (TEQ) levels ranging from 147-238 ppt. All dioxin/furan concentrations in the treated soil were reduced to extremely low levels, as indicated in Table 4-6. Levels of2,3,7,8 TCDD TEQ of 0, 0.07, 0.63 and 2.95 ppt were recorded ETG Environmental, Inc. 14 August, 1997 I I I I Analytes I Total MonoCB Total DiCB Total TriCB I Total TetraCB Total PentaCB I Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB I Total NonaCB DecaCB I Total PCB I Raw Soil Total PCB I Removal Efficiency % I I I I I I I I TABLE 4-5 WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY PCBs DATA SUMMARY -TREATED SOIL WC1-3 ug/kg (ppb) ND (0 .04) ND (0.04) ND (0.05) ND (0.07) ND (0.09) 0.57 0.17 ND (0.10) ND (0.10) ND (0.10) t3 \ ' 547,027 99.9999 WC1-4 ug/kg (ppb) ND (0.05) ND (0.04) ND (0.05) ND (0.07) 0.28 1.60 0.67 ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) !3 ' 853,316 99.9997 WC2-3 ug/kg (ppb) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.2) ND (0.2) ND (0.3) ND (0.2) ND(0.1) ND (0.2) ND (0.2) ND (0.2) 0 372,307 100 WC2-4 ug/kg (ppb) ND (0.09) ND (0.09) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.2) ND (0.1) ND (0 .1) ND (0.1) ND(0.1) ND (0.2) 0 258,954 100 I I I TABLE 4-6 WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY PCDDs/PCDFs DATA SUMMARY -TREATED SOIL I WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 AVE Analytes ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) I 2378-TCDD ND (0.3) ND (0 .3) ND (0.3) ND (0.3) 12378-PeCDD ND (0.4) ND (0.4) ND (0.6) ND (0 .5) I 1234 78-HxCDD ND (0.5) ND (0.5) ND (0.6) ND (0 .5) 123678-HxCDD ND (0.4) ND (0.4) ND (0.5) ND (0.4) I 123789-HxCDD ND (0.5) ND (0.4) ND (0.6) ND (0.5) 1234678-HpCDD ND (0.6) ND (0 .5) ND (1 .2) ND (0.6) OCDD ND (0.8) 0.99 ND (2.5) ND (0.9) I 2378-TCDF ND (0.3) 3.3 ND (0.6) ND (0.3) 12378-PeCDF ND (0.3) 2.2 ND (0.5) ND (0.5) I 234 78-PeCDF ND (0.3) 2.9 ND (0.5) 0.79 1234 78-HxCDF ND (0.5) 6.3 ND (0.6) 1.6 123678-HxCDF ND (0.4) 1.5 ND (0.4) ND (0.4) I 234678-HxCDF 0.65 2.5 ND (0.6) 0.68 123789-HxCDF ND (0.6) ND (0.5) ND (0.7) ND (0.6) 1234678-HpCDF 0.7 3.3 ND (0.8) 0.64 I 1234 789-HpCDF ND (0.7) ND (0.6) ND (1.0) ND (0.7) OCDF ND (0.6) 1.1 ND (1 .9) ND (0.7) I 2378-TEQ 0.072 2.96 0.00 0.63 0.91 Raw Soil 218 238 147 159 190.5 I % Removal 99.97 98.76 100 99.6 99.52 Total TCDD ND (0.3) ND (0.3) ND (0.3) ND (0.3) I Total PeCDD ND (0.4) ND (0.4) ND (0.6) ND (0 .6) Total HxCDD ND (0.5) ND (0.4) ND (0.6) ND (0.5) Total HpCDD ND (0.6) ND (0.5) ND (1.2) ND (0.8) I OCDD ND (0.8) 0.99 ND (2.5) ND (0.9) Total TCDF ND (0.3) 10.9 ND (0.6) ND (0.3) I Total PeCDF ND (0.3) 14.4 ND (0.5) 2.7 Total HxCDF 0.65 16.1 ND (0.6) 3.7 Total HpCDF 0.7 3.3 ND (0.9) 0.64 I OCDF ND (0.6) 1.1 ND (1 .9) ND (0.7) Total PCDD/F 1.35 46.8 0.0 7.00 13.8 I Raw Soil 10,192 11,727 9,825 8,405 10,037 % Removal 99.99 99.60 100 99.92 99.86 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill for the four ( 4) test runs. Three of the four test runs met the preliminary remediation goal of 1 ppt TEQ for dioxin/furans. The average of the four runs was 0.91 ppt, below the preliminary target standard. If the four samples would have been composited, the average value would meet the preliminary target site standard. Compositing batches of approximately 200 tons of treated soil is standard for full scale verification of the detoxification process. Removal efficiencies for dioxins/furans in the soil ranged from 98 -100%. Please note that these efficiencies are slightly lower than for PCBs due to the low initial concentrations, not from a lack of process detoxification effectiveness. VOCs -VOC concentrations in all raw waste samples (Table 4-4) and treated soils (Table 4-7) were non-detect for most of the compounds ( detection limit in the ppt levels), except as noted below. In the raw waste samples, only Acetone (17.4 ppb), 2-Butanone (64.4 ppb), and Chlorobenzene (27.6 and 28.3 ppb) were analyzed at above the 10 ppb level. For treated soils, only trichlorofluoromethane (19.9 and 13.6 ppb), acetone (10.3 ppb), and carbon tetrachloride (342 and 190 ppb) were analyzed at above 10 ppb level. Carbon tetrachloride is probably the by-product of chemical dechlorination from the larger PCBs molecules. However, there values are substantially lower than the Universal Treatment Standard (UTS) level of 6,000 ppb for carbon tetrachloride as defined in the RCRA regulations. 4.2. Condensate Treatment Liquid aqueous condensate from the optimization test (Sample WC 2-4) was sent to the BCD Group in Cincinnati for PCB analysis. No OEganie condensate was-collected. The PCB analysis ETG Environmental, Inc. 15 August, 1997 I I TABLE 4-7 I WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY voe DATA SUMMARY-TREATED SOIL I WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 UTS Non-WW Analytes ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg Chloromethane 11.72 ND(0.33) ND(0.22) 6 30,000 I Vinyl Chloride ND(0.28) ND(0.27) ND(0.19) ND(0.2) Bromomethane ND(0.37) ND(0.37) ND(0.26) ND(0.23) Chloroethane ND(0.34) ND(0.33) ND(0.22) ND(0.24) I Trichlorofluoromethane ND(0.12) ND(0.12) 19.9 13.6 1, 1-Dichloroethene ND(0.24) ND(0.23) ND(0.17) ND(0.16) I Carbon disulfide ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.05) 0.21 4,800 Acetone ND(0.33) ND(0.32) 10.28 ND(0.16) 160,000 Methylene chloride ND(0.17) ND(0.16) 8.66 8.21 30,000 I trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene ND(0.16) ND(0.16) ND(0.12) ND(0.12) 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.06) ND(0.07) cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethane ND(0.16) ND(0.16) ND(0.11) ND(0.12) I Chloroform ND(0.08) ND(0.08) 2.22 1.48 6,000 1,2-Dichloroethane ND(0.11) ND(0.11) ND(0.07) ND(0.09) Vinyl acetate ND(0.05) ND(0.05) ND(0.04) ND(0.06) I 2-Butanone ND(1 .19) ND(1 .19) ND(0.55) ND(0.76) 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.08) Carbon tetrachloride ND(0.09) ND(0.09) 341 .78 189.67 6,000 I Benzene ND(0.04) ND(0.04) 4.38 2.46 10,000 Trichloroethene ND(0.11) ND(0.11) ND(0.11) ND(0.26) I 1,2-Dichloropropane ND(0.09) ND(0.09) ND(0.1) ND(0.15) Bromodichloromethane ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.08) cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.07) ND(0.09) I trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.1) 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane ND(0.11) ND(0.11) ND(0.1) ND(0.13) Dibromochloromethane ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.18) I Bromoform ND(0.10) ND(0.10) ND(0.1) ND(0.24) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.05) ND(0.09) Toluene 3.42 2.81 6.69 5.54 10,000 I Tetrach loroethene ND(0.12) ND(0.12) 2.57 5.75 6,000 2-Hexanone ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.06) ND(0.11) Chlorobenzene ND(0.04) ND(0.04) 6.7 5.95 6,000 I Ethylbenzene ND(0.08) ND(0.09) ND(0.1) ND(0.12) m-/p-Xylene ND(0.06) ND(0.07) ND(0.08) ND(0.09) a-Xylene ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.08) ND(0.1) 30,000 I Styrene ND(0.04) ND(0.04) ND(0.05) ND(0.05) 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill indicated non-detect levels (1.5 ppb for mono-PCB to 200 ppb for deca-PCB) were present, indicating successful detoxification by solid phase BCD. A composite of condensate sample was treated with granular activated carbon (GAC). Pre-and post-carbon treatment data analyzed by Triangle Laboratories is summarized in Table 4-8 through 4-10. GAC was effective in improving water quality. Total PCBs were reduced from 310 ppb to 99 ppb (68% removal) as shown in Table 4-8. Dioxin-TEQ concentration was treated from 6.2 ppt to 2.3 ppt (63% removal) as shown in Table 4-9. The majority ofVOCs in the condensate composite and two treated water samples (using two different dilution factors) were non-detect with detection levels of 2 ppb or less. Only acetone (471 ppb), methylene chloride (3.35 ppb), 2-butanone (17.2 ppb) and toluene (7.27 ppb) were detected in the composite condensate. For example, acetone was treated from 471 ppb to 242 and 268 ppb in two different dilution factors. 2-butanone was treated from 17.2 ppb to 9.75 in one dilution (Ix) sample and non-detect (13.8 ppb) in another dilution (5x) sample. Based on these results, ETG anticipates that a more sophisticated conventional, commercially available system would be utilized for full scale treatment. ETG's recommended design would utilize phase separation of any organic and aqueous phases ( oil/water separation), polymer flocculation/clarification, sand filtration, and UV oxidation to remove and destroy any organics in the aqueous condensate stream. From each test run, a small quantity of oily fine particulate (20 to 100 grams) was collected from the vapor recovery system and submitted to the BCD Group in Cincinnati for analysis. The results of this analysis indicated PCB contamination, as shown in Table 4-11. Thus, to ensure complete destruction/detoxification, semi-VOCs and other organic chlorinated compounds removed ETG Environmental, Inc. 16 August, 1997 I I I TABLE 4-8 WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY PCB DATA SUMMARY -Condensate I Condensate Treated Blank I Analytes Com posite(ppb) Water(ppb) (ppb) Total MonoCB 0.39 0.05 ND(<0.001) I Total DiCB Total TriCB 0.82 0.13 ND(<0.001) 5 1 ND(0.001) I Total TetraCB Total PentaCB 11.2 2.9 ND(0.002) 40.1 12.2 ND(0.002) Total HexaCB 167 57.3 ND(0.002) I Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB 75.1 26.9 ND(0.002) 10.2 4.2 ND(0.002) Total NonaCB I DecaCB 0.24 0.11 ND(0.003) ND(0.003) ND(0.003) I Total PCB 310 99 ND Removal I Efficiency(%) 68 I I I I I I I I I I Table 4-9 I Warren County PCB Landfill Treatability Study Dioxin Data Summary -Condensate I Water Condensate Treated Analytes (ppq) Blank Composite Condensate I 2378-TCDD 5.6 ND(14.6) 7.6 12378-PeCDD ND(2.8) ND(32.1) ND(10.4) I 123478-HxCDD ND(3.5) 19.2 7.6 123678-HxCDD 5 29.1 ND(9.6) I 123789-HxCDD ND(5.1) 45.5 19.2 1234678-HpCDD ND(3.2) 192 78 OCDD 31.8 552 297 I 2378-TCDF 8.3 21050 6530 12378-PeCDF ND(7.3) 7590 2760 I 23478-PeCDF ND(2.2) 6180 2580 123478-HxCDF ND(7.0) 3400 1290 I 123678-HxCDF 4.3 1520 579 234678-HxCDF ND(7.5) 954 359 123789-HxCDF 8.6 344 108 I 1234678-HpCDF ND(5.3) 489 201 1234 789-HpCDF ND(3.2) 64.1 ND(24.2) I OCDF 9.1 75.4 46.2 Total TCDD 5.6 345 62.2 I Total PeCDD ND(2.8) 295 88.5 Total HxCDD 5 433 157 Total HpCDD ND(3.2) 429 187 I Total TCDF 8.3 82020 26460 I Total PeCDF ND(7.3) 45190 18840 Total HxCDF 12.9 11290 4250 Total HpCDF ND(5.3) 595 253 I Dioxin -TEQ (ppt) 0.08 6.2 2.3 I Removal Efficiency(%) 63 I I ----------···-- I Table 4-10 I Warren County PCB Landfill Treatability Study voe Data Summary -Condensate I Condensate Treated Treated Analytes (ug/1) Composite (5x) Water (1x) Water (5x) Blank I Chloromethane ND(1 .24) ND(0.25) ND(1 .24) ND(0.25) Vinyl Chloride ND(1 .39) ND(0.28) ND(1 .39) ND(0.28) Bromomethane ND(2.24) ND(0.45) ND(2.24) ND(0.46) I Chloroethane ND(2.20) ND(0.44) ND(2.20) ND(0.45) Trichlorofluoromethane ND(1.13) ND(0.23) ND(1 .13) ND(0.23) I 1, 1-Dichloroethene ND(1 .77) ND(0.36) ND(1 .77) ND(0.36) Carbon disulfide ND(0.43) ND(0.09) ND(0.43) ND(0.09) Acetone 470.62 241.59 268.2 4.66 I Methylene chloride 3.35 ND(0.27) 3.03 0.88 trans-1,2-Dichloroethe ND(1.41) ND(0.28) ND(1.41) ND(0.29) 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND(0.69) ND(0.14) ND(0.69) ND(0.14) I cis-1,2-Dichloroethane ND(1 .34) ND(0.27) ND(1 .34) ND(0.27) Chloroform ND(0.67) ND(0.14) ND(0.67) ND(0.14) 1,2-Dichloroethane ND(1 .01) ND(0.20) ND(1 .01) ND(0.21) I Vinyl acetate ND(0.45) ND(0.09) ND(0.45) ND(0.10) 2-Butanone 17.19 9.75 ND(13.79) ND(3.07) I 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND(0.77) ND(0.16) ND(0.78) ND(0.17) Carbon tetrachloride ND(0.88) ND(0.18) ND(0.90) ND(0.20) Benzene ND(0.32) ND(0.07) ND(0.33) ND(0.07) I Trichloroethene ND(0.97) ND(0.20) ND(0.99) ND(0.22) 1,2-Dichloropropane ND(1 .01) ND(0.21) ND(1.02) ND(0.23) Bromodichloromethane ND(0.67) ND(0.14) ND(0.68) ND(0.15) I cis-1,3-Dichloropropen ND(0.65) ND(0.13) ND(0.66) ND(0.15) trans-1 ,3-Dichloroprop ND(0.74) ND(0.15) ND(0.75) ND(0.17) 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane ND(1.30) ND(0.26) ND(1.32) ND(0.29) I Dibromochloromethan ND(0.87) ND(0.18) ND(0.89) ND(0.20) Bromoform ND(1.56) ND(0.32) ND(1.59) ND(0.36) I 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND(0.98) ND(0.20) ND(1 .00) ND(0.21) Toluene 7.27 ND(0.11) 7.02 1.81 Tetrachloroethene ND(1.23) ND(0.25) ND(1.26) ND(0.26) I 2-Hexanone ND(1.45) ND(0.30) ND(1 .48) ND(0.31) Chlorobenzene ND(0.46) ND(0.09) ND(0.47) ND(0.10) Ethyl benzene ND(0.86) ND(0.18) ND(0.88) ND(0.19) I m-/p-Xylene ND(0.71) ND(0.14) ND(0.72) ND(0.15) a-Xylene ND(0.73) ND(0.15) ND(0.75) ND(0.16) Styrene ND(0.45) ND(0.09) ND(0.46) ND(0.10) I 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroeth ND(0.81) ND(0.17) ND(0.83) ND(0.17) I I I I Table 4-11 I BCD GROUP Inc. / US EPA Cincinnati PCB Results for the ETG Dust Samples WC1-4, WC1-4 & WC2-3 I Warren County, NC. I Measured concentrations in PPB (ng/g) Dust Sample Dust Sample Dust Sample I WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 PCB Congener Group I Mono-PCBs 220 260 ND(10)* I Di-PCBs 930 1700 340 Tri-PCB 18750 9380 2260 I Tetra-PCBs 10580 44320 5710 I Penta-PCBs 52960 178870 42540 I Hexa-PCBs 159550 692050 151700 Hepta-PCBs 118060 541880 148950 I Octa-PCBs 26820 109990 32640 I Nona-PCBs ND(500) 4090 ND(500) I Deca-PCB ND(1 ppm) ND(1 ppm) ND(1 ppm) I Total (PPM) 387.87 1,582.54 384.14 *MDQ in ppb unless indicated otherwise I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill as oily fine particulates will be recycled back to the solid phase thermal reactor for further solid phase BCD ( chemical dechlorination) treatment. Any soluble organic condensate collected in the water treatment system would be detoxified in the liquid phase BCD system. Any soluble organics remaining in the aqueous phase would be destroyed in the UV oxidation unit to a non-detect level. A test on artificially spiked PCB organic liquid was performed by the BCD Group in Cincinnati and results are attached as Table 4-12. As indicated, liquid phase BCD is completely effective in detoxifying residual PCBs in the liquid phase. 4.3 Air Monitoring and Modeling As can be seen in Table 4-13, system air discharges were significantly lower than the preliminary air standards as shown in Section 1.2 of this report. ETG utilized continuous air monitoring (as performed by Waterford Compliance Group) and a USEPA approved program (Screen 3) to model emissions at the property line. A conservative property border of 200 feet from the desorber vessel unit was assumed for this model. At the property line, dioxin TEQ values are 4.12 x 10-9, 5.43 x 10-9, and 6.01 x 10-9 ug/dscm, all below the preliminary target level of 5.0 x 10-s ug/dscm. For PCBs, the values are 1.68 x 10"", 9.06 x 10-5, and 1.05 x 0-6 ug/dscm, all below the preliminary target level of 8.0 x 0--ug/dscm. 4.4. Environmental, Safety Performance, and Reliability All four (4) test runs were conducted without incident or any shutdown of equipment. No environmental releases of any kind were recorded. (Normal system air discharges were continuously monitored and recorded as previously described). Treated soil will be submitted for disposal. Documentation of final legal disposal can be provided to NCDEHNR upon request. ETG Environmental, Inc. 17 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 4-12 PCB Results for the BCD Organic Liquid Study* Treating 10,000 ppm of PCBs (liquid phase) Test Run BCD Reaction (KOH:PCB; 1.75:1) Measured concentrations in PPM (mg/ml) PCB Congener TIME TIME TIME TIME Group 0 5 Minutes 30 Minutes 60 Minutes Mono-PCBs 8.7 505 ND(0.10) ND(0.10) Di-PCBs 109 57.9 ND(0.10) ND(0.10) Tri-PCB 1540 ND(0.20) ND(0.20) ND(0.20) Tetra-PCBs 6446 ND(0.25) ND(0.25) ND(0.25) Penta-PCBs 1859 ND(0.25) ND(0.25) ND(0.25) Hexa-PCBs 41 ND(0.25) ND(0.25) ND(0.25) Hepta-PCBs ND(0.30) ND(0.30) ND(0.30) ND(0.30) Note: ND= non detect at the MDQ contained in the brackets. * Test conducted by BCD Group Inc.IVS EPA Cincinnati -------------------Contaminant Sample No. Dioxin -TEQ (ug/dscm) Total PCBs (ug/dscm) Particulates gr/dscf VOCs (Test 3) Toluene Ethyl benzene Xylenes Benezene Table 4-13 Warren County PCB Landfill Treatability Air Monitoring & Modeling Data Summary (Results in ug/dscm unless indicated otherwise) Stack Discharge Stack Discharge Model Results Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 WC2-3 WCl-3 WCl-4 2.96 E -5 3.42 E -5 4.26 E -5 4.12 E -9 5.43 E -9 6.01 E -9 1.20 E +0 1.16 E +0 7.44 E -3 1.68 E -4 9.06 E -5 1.05 E-6 0.0004 0.0003 0.0006 ppmv ug/dscm <0.46 <1,800 <0.46 <1,800 <0.46 <1,800 <0.46 <1,800 Air Emmision Performance Goal 5.0 E -8 8.0 E-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 4.5. Treatment Effectiveness Based on the test results, the Therm-O-Detox®/BCD process has effectively treated the contaminated soils with 266-853 ppm of total PCBs to less than 2.3 ppb, meeting the targeted performance criteria of 20 ppb. - Substantial levels of dioxins and furans (8.4 -11.7 ppb total) were detected in all raw soil samples. Three out of the four treated samples have met the targeted dioxin-TEQ level of 1 ppt and the remaining one achieved 3 ppt. A composited mixture of the four (4) samples would meet the preliminary targeted treatment criteria. Oily fine particulates would be sent back to the thermal desorber unit for further solid phase BCD treatment. The preliminary air emission performance goals of 8x 1 Q-4 ug/cubic meter for PCBs and 5xl ()-8 ug/cubic meter for dioxin TEQ at the property boundary were also successfully achieved. The extensive off-gas treatment system, including multi-stage condensing steps and a flameless thermal oxidization polishing unit, will ensure an environmentally safe performance and minimal discharge of contaminants to the atmosphere. Residual PCBs in and dioxins/furans in the liquid organic phase would be detoxified in the liquid phase BCD reactor. Residual organics in the liquid aqueous phase would be destroyed by the UV oxidization system in the water treatment system. Thus, BCD system effectiveness for soils, air, and liquid streams have been conclusively proven over four ( 4) performance runs. ETG Environmental, Inc. 18 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 5.0 Technical Discussions -Full Scale Process Considerations ETG has assumed that the samples received for the State of North Carolina were representative of both the wet and dry portions of the landfill (as indicated at the pre-bid conference held 2/17 /97 in Raleigh). As indicated in Table 4-1 , all samples were relatively dry (in excess of 90% solids). As such, dewatering of these materials was not required for the pilot scale testing and would not be required for the full scale detoxification of the Warren County landfill. This will substantially reduce material preparation costs for the full scale BCD process. If water content in the soil is present in levels above those recorded during this study, the process effectiveness will not be negatively impacted. However, the process throughput would be reduced by elevated moisture content, which would have an adverse impact on full scale detoxification costs. The ETG batch vacuum system is ideally suited and can handle high moisture content feed material (i.e. sludges) without problems. ETG's typical field installation will involve utilization of both continuous and batch vacuum systems. (A more detailed description of the systems are described in the next section). This approach will provide additional operational flexibility in the event that high moisture materials are encountered in the field. The ETG system(s) further assure effective treatment by providing uniform heating and soil mixing to provide for optimum heat transfer and even distribution of BCD reagents, and flexible residence time to guarantee effective detoxification. The ETG Vapor Recovery System (VRS) is a state-of-the-art system designed to utilize multiple stages of particulate removal, scrubbers/condensers, and polishing units to handle a wide ETG Environmental, Inc. 19 August, 1997 I I I I I I I -~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill range of contaminant concentrating in the soil while minimizing discharge of contaminants to the atmosphere. Results from the pilot study have indicated that PCB contaminated fine particulates may be generated during full scale processing. This, ETG recommends providing a more extensive VRS at the full scale level than employed during the pilot test. Utilization of dry (i.e. hot cyclone) and wet systems (wet electrostatic precipitator) for particulate removal ensure virtually 100% removal of particulates greater than 3 microns and over 99% for particulate/aerosols (micron and submicron size droplets of organic liquid) less than 3 microns. Dry particulate that is collected will be sent back to the thermal unit for further BCD treatment, if contaminated. GAC was effective in improving water quality by removing organics from the aqueous phase condensate. However, in an effort to further improve removal efficiency of organic removal from the aqueous phase, ETG recommends a more extensive water treatment system. The system would include oil/water separation, polymer flocculation/clarification, sand filtration, and UV oxidation for complete organic removal/destruction. Solids collected from the water treatment would be tested and either backfilled (if clean) or recycled back to the thermal unit for additional treatment (if contaminated). ETG Environmental, Inc. 20 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 6.0 Full Scale Treatment -Indirect Heat Thermal Desorption/BCD with Off-gas Condensing, Continuous and Batch Vacuum System Description ETG has been developing several in-direct heated thermal desorption/BCD technologies including continuous and batch systems for nearly six years which have been trade named Therm-O- Detox®. The Company has applied direct and in-direct heated systems at ten project sites covering a variety of contaminated organic soils and sludges which include PCBs, herbicides, pesticides, oily sludges, PCP and dioxin/furans. The thermal equipment is a very compact and mobile system and offers low processing costs. The batch vacuum system is unique due to the application of high vacuum and heat while simultaneously agitating and mixing the waste material thus exposing waste particles to the heat source to obtain efficient desorption. This system is particularly effective on high moisture material and very high boiling point organic compounds. The continuous system has been proven extensively for soil remediation applications and is also a compact, mobile system. This system offers numerous technological advantages over other thermal desorption systems, primarily high throughput capacity. Vacuum conditions also offers inherent safety advantages in that no contaminants will escape the system into the atmosphere (vacuum will draw air into the system and not allow contaminated air to leave the system). 6.1 Batch Vacuum ETG's Therm-O-Detox® batch vacuum thermal desorption and chemical dechlorination technology is a unique in-direct heated system which operates under a high vacuum (27"-29" Hg) and temperatures up to 1000°F to effectively desorb organic compounds from soils, sludges, ETG Environmental, Inc. 21 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill sediments and debris. The system has been under development and has continually been refined to its current design during the last several years and applied at multiple sites. The system with internal heating and agitation is highly flexible, operates in a batch mode, and can handle the most difficult hazardous waste compounds. Patents for the system have been issued. The feed material is processed on a batch basis by the indirectly heated rotary vacuum desorber. The complete mixing action afforded by the rotary vacuum desorber's internal mixing flights and internal central heating mixing tubes constantly agitate and break-up the soil particles, thus exposing the particles to the heat source. Heat transfer is enhanced by a large heat surface area to allow rapid heating of the soil for optimum contaminant removal. The desorber is contained within an outer insulated heating chamber, where fuel burners (using No. 2 oil, propane, or natural gas) supply the indirect heat. There is no contact between the heat source and the contaminated material. Exhaust gas from the fuel burner ( which also does not contact the waste) is discharged from the top of the insulated heating chamber. The desorber is capable of heating the waste up to 1000°F. The throughput rate depends upon waste moisture content, contaminants and treatment standards. A waste with higher moisture content will result in reduced production while lower moisture content will allow faster production. The desorber vessels are in several sizes (from 10 yd3 to 40 yd3) and are generally operated on a 24 hour per day, 7 day per week basis. The batch operation and equipment design provide system flexibility to allow treatment of contaminated materials with higher moisture content and contaminant concentration. The system also has the ability to process waste to obtain very low residual concentrations of remaining organics in the processed material due to the ability to vary key ETG Environmental, Inc. 22 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill operating variables including batch time, temperature and vacuum. During heating and agitation, vacuum is applied to the rotary desorber, greatly enhancing the desorption of the contaminants. The vacuum pump provides a nominal 125 -150 ACFM of vapor flow at 27" -29" Hg vacuum allowing the system to operate under an inert condition. Vapors in the off-gas will be condensed and recovered by the scrubber(s)/ condenser(s) in the Vapor Recovery System (VRS-the scrubbers/condensers generally operate between 50-120°F). The condensed contaminants and water from the vapors are collected in on-board receiving tanks. Recovered liquid remains in the tanks, while the vapor travels through the condensing units and vacuum pump into final vapor and particulate removal polishing. A wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) is used for final particulate removal polishing. A flameless oxidizer unit operating at 1600°F is added for the final vapor. polishing. The flameless oxidizer virtually eliminates non- condensables and residual organic contaminants not removed by the physical separation/adsorption equipment of the VRS, and acts only as a polisher prior to final discharge of air to the atmosphere. 6.2 Continuous System The continuous system is designed such that material is processed continuously through the indirectly heated rotary desorber. The unit's internal mechanisms provide mixing and transport the waste through the desorption chamber. Heat transfer is enhanced by a large heat transfer surface area to allow rapid heating of the soil for optimum contaminant removal. The desorber is contained within an outer insulated heating chamber where fuel burners (using No. 2 oil, propane or natural gas) supply the indirect heat. Again, there is no contact between the heat source and the contaminated material. Exhaust gas (which again does not contact the waste) from the fuel burner ETG Environmental, Inc. 23 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill is discharged from the top of the insulated heating chamber. The desorber vessel is generally operated 24 hours/day, 7 days per week. Throughput is higher than the batch vacuum unit and depends on waste characteristic variations including moisture content and contaminant concentration. Vapors in the off-gas will be removed from the desorber unit by an inert sweep gas and sent to the extensive VRS for treatment including condensation and particulate removal. Multiple stages of direct contact condensers and a wet electrostatic precipitator (WESP) are utilized for particulate removal and to condense contaminants and moisture from the vapor stream. Recovered liquid remains in on-board tanks for recycling back to the condensers through a heat exchanger cooling system. A condensate bleed stream will be removed for treatment and product recovery/recycling. The vapors will continue into a flameless oxidizer unit operating at 1600°F for the final vapor polishing. The flameless oxidizer virtually eliminates non-condensables and residual organic contaminants not removed by the physical separation/adsorption equipment of the VRS, and acts only as a polisher prior to final discharge of air to the atmosphere. 6.3 Base Catalyzed Decomposition ("BCD") Treatment he Therm-O-Detox® system is used in conjunction with the USEPA patented Base Catalyzed Decomposition (BCD) chemical dechlorination process to chemically detoxify high hazard chlorinated substances including PCBs, dioxins, furans, and pesticides/herbicides. Initially, BCD reagents are added to the desorber vessel, initiating solid phase BCD destruction of contaminants, and physically separating the detoxified contaminants from the contaminated material (soil). Condensed chlorinated organics are sent to a liquid tank reactor (L TR), where addition of a ETG Environmental, Inc. 24 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill hydrogen donor, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH) and a proprietary catalyst result in replacement of the chlorine atom with hydrogen (chemical detoxification/destruction) at temperatures in the 600°F -650°F range. This dechlorinated oil (which is generally non-hazardous) is recycled/reused off-site as a RCRA permitted fuel supplement in an industrial boiler such as a cement kiln. The solid phase BCD reagents added to the MTTD unit result in reduction of the concentration of contaminants in the treated waste, as well as reduction in the amount of liquid organics requiring liquid phase BCD treatment. 6.4 Material Handling and Preparation As indicated by Table 4-1 and discussed in Section 5 .1, dewatering of contaminated soils at Warren County will not be required for full scale detoxification of the landfill. Although design and cost estimates for full scale material handling and preparation systems for the BCD detoxification would be performed in the Phase II remedial design process, ETG has assumed that standard excavation and removal procedures would be required and that a screening/crushing system will be utilized to remove any debris (rocks, tree stumps, etc.) over 1-2" in particle size. The resulting screened material would then be processed in the Therm-0-Detox/BCD System. The oversize materials are typically contaminated on the surface, which can be removed in the field via standard decon procedures. The resulting "clean" debris can be tested and backfilled with the treated, "clean" soil. 6.5 Water Treatment The design and cost estimate for the full scale water treatment system will be performed during the Phase II remedial design activities. However, ETG anticipates that conventional, ETG Environmental, Inc. 25 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill commercially available systems would be utilized for water treatment at the Warren County Landfill. ETG's initial concept would utilize fractionation of the organic and aqueous phase (oil/water separator), polymer flocculation of oily fine particulates, sand filtration, and UV oxidation to destroy any organics (including PCBs and dioxins/furans) remaining in the aqueous condensate stream. Any organic condensate would be sent to the liquid phase BCD system. Treated, clean water would be recycled on-site to cool and hydrate the treated soil from the solid phase BCD process. 6.6 Capabilities for Full Scale Treatment As more fully described in our Proposal to NCDEHNR ( dated 3/17 /97), ETG has performed numerous full scale detoxification projects for applications where PCB and dioxin/furans contamination was present. This extensive real world, field experience has resulted in continued process design improvements of the Therm-O-Detox/BCD System. The continued development ofETG's Therm-O-Detox/BCD process is evident by the recent award to ETG by USEP A at the Southern Maryland Wood Treatment Site (SMWTS) in Hollywood, Maryland. The SMWTS is a former wood preserving site contaminated with pentachlorophenol (PCP), creosote and dioxins/furans. ETG has been contracted by ICF Kaiser (ICF is the prime contractor to the U.S. Government) for thermal desorption of 145,000 tons of material. (BCD will not be utilized due to the low concentration of dioxins). e project is the highest profile Superfund clean-up presently being conducted by Region 3 of the USEPA. ETG is expecting start-up of this project in the spring of 1998, ETG would welcome the opportunity to escort members of the Working Group, including NCDEHNR and science advisors on a tour of this facility. We at.ETG believe this would conclusively prove our capabilities to provide a full scale detoxification system ETG Environmental, Inc. 26 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill at the Warren County Landfill. A more detailed listing of our capabilities and experience may be provided upon request. ETG Environmental, Inc. 27 August, 1997 -------------------SCREENED CONTAMINATED MATERIALS PARTICULATE REMOVAL VAPOR DISCHARGES ......,,.... ,::'iO~OR INDIRECT ~ 1 I I I I HEAT SOURCE DIWIII II\': MM om: 4/n/17 Rf.'f1SIO(f f 1 MEDIUM TEMPERATURE THERMAL DESORPTION (MTTD) C:\DWG\EfG\IIMY_00NT2.IJWG WATER sueeLY TO MTTD UNIT OR COOLING UNIT COOLING UNIT DECONTAMINATED SOIL ETG ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 11 HagtrfJ Blvd., Wat Chatlr PA 19312•(110)431-9100 WET SCRUBBING/ QUENCHING CONDENSING SYSTEM RECYCLE TO WATER TREATMENT AND PRODUCT RECOVERY TO ATMOSPHERE FLAMELESS WET ESP THERMAL OXIDIZER CONDENSER/ESP WATER SUPPLY HEAT EXCHANGER COOLING TOWER RECYCLE . PUMP PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM -CONTINUOUS THERM-O-DETOX SYSTEM -------------------SCREENED CONTAMINATED MATERIALS WET SCRUBBING/ PARTICULATE QUENCHING REMOVAL CONDENSING SYSTEM VAPOR DISCHARGES .._,,.... , ~o~~oR INDIRECT ~ 1 HEAT I I I I I I I SOURCE DRAWN Bl': 11M Di\lE: 4~/17 REWl0N f 1 MEDIUM TEMPERATURE THERMAL DESORPTION (MTTD) C:\DWG\ETC\IIARl'JIATCH2.DWG TO MTTD UNIT OR COOLING UNIT ., ', ', ',', ', '• COOLING UNIT DECONTAMINATED SOIL ETG ENVIRONMENTAL INC. 11 Hagerty Blvd., Welt Chelflr PA 11382•(110~1-1100 R SUPPLY TO ATMOSPHERE VACUUM PUMP WET FSP CONDENSATE STORAGE TO WATER TREATMENT AND PRODUCT RECOVERY FLAMELESS THERMAL OXIDIZER PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM -BATCH VACUUM THERM-O-DETOX SYSTEM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -------------------Therm-O-Detox Batch Vacuum System -lllf!!!!!IIAl//1& s=au Envlronmental, Inc. BCD -Chemical Dehalogenation • Destroys Recalcitrant Contaminants: -PCBs -Dioxins I Furans -Pesticides • Licensed from EPA-RREL • Coupled to ETG's Therm-O-Detox® System --#IIJII. a=au Environmental, Inc. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 7.0 Full Scale Treatment Economics For the purpose of estimating costs for the full scale detoxification system at Warren County, ETG has assumed a total scope of work including material excavation and preparation, soil processing, BCD (liquid phase) processing, water treatment, soil and water verification analysis, and backfilling of treated soil. The pilot scale testing has allowed ETG to conclusively demonstrate the effectiveness of the Therm-O-Detox/BCD system to successfully detoxify the contaminated soils at Warren County while minimizing air discharge of contaminants to the atmosphere. On this basis, ETG can introduce [ a ~= J2-ffl • .,....,,,,,,,~~ n 60,00 processed at Warren County for the scope of work described above. Full scale production rates are estimated at 300 -400 tons/day (24 hrs/day, 7 days/week). This estimate could be substantially reduced by approximately 35% (into the $15 million or $250/ton range) if preliminary treatment standards for the soil (20 ppb PCB, 1 ppt dioxin TEQ) were increased to levels consistent with similar applications elsewhere in the United States. ETG would be pleased to provide technical information to support these higher standards. These issues can be discussed more thoroughly during Phase II activities. ETG Environmental, Inc. 28 August, 1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pilot Scale Test Report to NCDEHNR Warren County Landfill 7.0 Full Scale Treatment Economics For the purpose of estimating costs for the full scale detoxification system at Warren County, ETG has assumed a total scope of work including material excavation and preparation, soil processing, BCD (liquid phase) processing, water treatment, soil and water verification analysis, and backfilling of treated soil. The pilot scale testing has allowed ETG to conclusively demonstrate the effectiveness of the Therm-O-Detox/BCD system to successfully detoxify the contaminated soils at Warren County while minimizing air discharge of contaminants to the atmosphere. On this basis, ETG is presenting a budgetary estimate of$23.4 million ($390/ton) based on 60,000 tons of contaminated soil to be processed at Warren County for the scope of work described above. Full scale production rates are estimated at 300 -400 tons/day (24 hrs/day, 7 days/week). This estimate could be substantially reduced by approximately 35% (into the $15 million or $250/ton range) if preliminary treatment standards for the soil (20 ppb PCB, 1 ppt dioxin TEQ) were increased to levels consistent with similar applications elsewhere in the United States. Therefore, ETG recommends that alternative soil treatment standards be explored during Phase II by performing a cost/benefit analysis. ETG Environmental, Inc. 28 August, 1997 Project Number: 42175 Sample File: FV452 1----"""""""' 1 1■- I l *~~i!!flll Bromochloromethane I Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomechane I Chlorocthane T richlorofluoromechane l, 1-Dichlorocthene I Carbon disulfide Acetone Methylene chloride I crans-1,2-Dichloroechene 1,1-Dichlorocthane I cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichlorocchane I 1,4-Difluorobenzene Vinyl acetate I 2-Butanone 1, 1, 1-T richlorocthane Carbon cecrachloride I Benzene T richlorocthene 1,2-Dichloropropane I Bromodichloromethanc cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropcnc crans-1,3-Dichloropropcnc I I IS 1 u u u u u u u u 2.60 BJ u u u u u IS 2 u u u u 1.47 J u u u u u 4.82 3.25 6.02 5.47 Method 8240A SOIL Sample ID: WCl-4 RAW 0.24 10 0.22 10 0.25 10 0.26 10 0.09 10 0.18 10 0.05 10 0.18 10 10 0.13 10 0.08 10 0.13 10 0.06 10 0.10 10 0.06 10 0.79 10 0.09 10 0.13 10 10 0.26 10 0.16 10 0.08 10 0.09 10 0.11 10 I NA• Not Applicable; Det. Umit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Umit IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: PreNnt In Blank; J: Eatimated• Below Quantitation Limit; E: Eatimated-Above Calibration Range I Triangle Ltboratoriu of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Smirv3.S Printed: 11:m ffl /15/l'J97 I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Number. 42175 Sample File: FV452 Sample Wgt.: 0.00501 Kg l, 1,2-T richlorocthanc Dibromochloromcthanc Bromoform Chlorobcnzcnc-d s 4-Methyl-2-pcncanonc Toluene T etrachlorocthenc 2-Hc:xanone Chlorobcnzene Ethylbcnzcne m-/p-Xylenc o-Xylene Styrene l, 1,2,2-T etrachlorocthanc 1,2-Dichlorocthanc-d 4 Toluene-d a 4-Bromofluorobcnzcnc Reviewed by E?r>-R> Dilution Factor. 28.29 0.21 0.23 0.20 u u u IS 3 u u u u B u u u u u Date .3.:..1 J.!::i..l~ 1.00 10.31 10.35 5.45 7.96 12.63 Method 8240A SOIL Sample ID: WCl-4 RAW 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.09 0.06 0.25 0.11 0.12 0.09 0.10 0.05 0.06 1 3 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 84 92 80 NA• Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection L¥1; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit [S: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Eatimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibraliaa Range Tl'Wlgle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) S44-S491 Savarv3.S Printed: 11:03 (17 /15/1997 36 I I Project Number: 42175 Sample File: FV454 1 ............... -- 1~_:f_l.;;;;;;;;r_t _~_r _t _~-~-i,, ~~~~~ I ili!I\IIISIIE Bromochloromethane I Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane I Chlorocthane T richlorofluoromethane 1.1-D ichlorocthene I Carbon disulfide Acetone I Methylene chloride trans-1,2-Dichloroethene l, 1-Dichlorocthane I cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichlorocthane 1.4-Difluorobcnzcne Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone 1,1, 1-Trichlorocthane Carbon tetr:1.chloride Benzene T richlorocthene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mns-1,3-Dichloropropene 6.04 4.10 2.55 2.59 1.60 u u u u u u J BJ u u u u u IS 2 u u u J J u u u u u 1.08 2.91 3.25 6.03 5.24 5.48 Method 8240A SOIL Sample ID: WC2-3 RAW 0.21 0.24 0.25 0.08 0.17 0.05 0.12 0.07 0.12 0.06 0.09 0.06 0.75 0.08 0.25 0.15 0.08 0.09 0.10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 I I I I I I I I NA• Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit IS: Internal StanCW'd; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Eatimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Eatimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.S Primed: 11:04 O'l /15 /199'7 42 I _1-~·-_·:_.'.:,:/6-\;:1~,;~ :~·-··· I Project Number: 42175 Sample File: FV454 I Method 8240A SOIL Sample ID: WC2-3 RAW ,J ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sample Wgt.: 0.00505 Kg 1.1,2-T richlorocclunc Oibromochloromcchanc Bromoform Chlorobcnzcnc-d 5 4-Mcthyl-2-pcntanonc Toluene T etrachloroechene 2-Ho:anone Chlorobenzcne Echylbenzene m-/p-Xylene o-Xylene Styrene l, 1,2,2-T etrachlorocchanc Dilution Factor: u u u IS 3 u 2.30 BJ 1.21 J u 2.02 BJ u 0.33 BJ u u u 1.00 10.32 8.06 8.89 10.36 10.88 0.12 0.18 0.24 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.05 0.06 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 11, ___ & ___ 1.2-Dichlorocchane-d 4 Toluene-cl a 4-Bromofluorobcnzcnc Reviewed by _____ ~---------- 0.19 0.23 0.19 Date ~ / ...l.2J S3 5M 1 n 7.97 3 92 12.63 3 76 NA• Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit IS: Internal Stand.ud; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Eatimated• Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated· Above ~ibration lunge Triangle uboratoriu of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Dur.ham. North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.5 Printed: 11:<M '17 /1S/19'1'1 43 I I Project Number: 42175 I Sample File: FV453 ··• I Bromochloromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chlo roe thane T richlorofluoromethane 1,1-Dichlorocthene Carbon disulfide Acetone Methylene chloride trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichlorocthane cis-1.2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichlorocthane 1,4-Difluorobcnzcne Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone l, l, 1-T richlorocthane Carbon cecrach.loride Benz.cne T richlorocthene 1.2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane cis-1.3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropcne 2.45 3.50 1.18 u u u u u u BJ u u u u u IS 2 u u u J J u u u u u 3.27 6.03 5.24 5.47 Method 8240A SOIL Sample ID: WC2-4 RAW 0.24 10 0.22 10 0.25 10 0.26 10 0.09 10 0.18 10 0.05 10 0.18 10 10 0.13 10 0.08 10 0.13 10 0.06 10 0.10 10 0.06 10 0.79 10 0.09 10 10 10 0.27 10 0.16 10 0.08 10 0.09 10 0.11 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I NA• Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Pnaent In Blank; J: Eltimated• Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham,, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.S Printed: 1L-<l3 C1l /15/19'0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Number: 42175 Sample File: FV453 Sample Wgt.: 0.00501 Kg 1, 1,2-T richlorocthane Dibromochloromethane Bromoform Chlorobcnzcne-d 5 4-Methyl-2-pencanone Toluene T etrachlorocthenc 2-Hcxanonc Chlorobcnzcne Ethylbcnzcne m-/p-Xylenc o-Xylcnc Styrene 1, 1,2,2-T ctrachlorocthane Dilution Factor: u u u IS 3 u 2.13 BJ u u 2.55 BJ u u u u u 1.00 10.32 8.05 10.36 Method 8240A SOIL Sample ID: WC2-4 RAW % Moisture: NA 0.13 10 0.19 10 0.25 10 0.09 10 10 0.26 10 0.12 10 10 0.13 10 0.09 20 0.10 10 0.06 10 0.06 10 1~•~~~ 1,2-Dichlorocthane-d~ 0.21 5.45 1 84 T olucne-d 0.25 7.96 3 100 8 4-Bromofluorobcnzcne 0.21 12.63 3 84 Reviewedby ____ @_ ... b-0 ........ ___ _ Date ::r, ~ ~ NA• Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantit.ltion Limit IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Preaent In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated• Above Cmbration Range Triangle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27113 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.S Printed: 11:m O'l /15/1997 56 I I TABLE 4-5 WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY I PCBs DATA SUMMARY -TREATED SOIL WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 I Analytes ug/kg (ppb) ug/kg (ppb) ug/kg (ppb) ug/kg (ppb) I Total MonoCB Total DiCB ND (0.04) ND (0.05) ND (0.1) ND (0.09) ND (0.04) ND (0.04) ND(0.1) ND (0.09) Total TriCB ND (0.05) ND (0.05) ND (0.2) ND (0.1) I Total TetraCB Total PentaCB ND (0.07) ND (0.07) ND (0.2) ND (0.1) ND (0.09) 0.28 ND (0.3) ND (0.2) I Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB 0.57 1.60 ND (0.2) ND(0.1 ) 0.17 0.67 ND(0.1) ND (0.1) Total OctaCB ND (0.10) ND (0.1) ND (0.2) ND(0.1) I Total NonaCB DecaCB ND (0.10) ND (0.1) ND (0.2) ND (0.1) ND (0.10) ND(0.1) ND (0.2) ND (0.2) I Total PCB 0.74 2.55 0 0 I Raw Soil Total PCB 547,027 853,316 372,307 258,954 I Removal Efficiency % 99.9999 99.9997 100 100 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: Client Sample: Client Project: Sample Matrix: TLI ID: Sample Size: Dry Weight Total MonoCB Total DiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB Total PenraCB Total HexaCB Total HepraCB Total OcraCB Total NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOTAL PCB+ EMPC 42329 WCl-3 E4038 SOLID 173-91-1 0.030 kg n/a 13C12-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB 13Ci2-2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5',6,6' -OctaCB 13C1i-2.2' ,5,5' -TetraCB 13C1 2-3,3',4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB ND ND ND ND ND 0.57 EMPC ND ND ND 0.57 0.74 27.4 24.4 26.7 Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP33700 Date Received: 07/03/97 Date Extracted: 07/10/97 Date Analyzed: 07/16/97 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Blank Ftle: YP33600 Analyst 2 DD 0.04 0.04 0.05 o.cn 0.()() 0.10 0.1 0.1 82.1 73.2 80.2 0.17 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Splice File: SPPCBF0l ICal: PCBY617 co·ncal: YP328 % Moisture: 0.1 % Lipid: % Solids: 0.78 0.89 1.29 0.78 1.28 n/a 99.9 23.77 29.72 25.20 19.73 28.20 Data Reviewer. -~---------V __ . J____...__¼t..___ ___ (fl/24191 Triangle Laboratories, lnc.e 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 ofl PCBP ..PSR t2.0CI. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 16:24 07/24/97 65 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A TEST DATA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 4-1 Physical Characteristics and Total PCB's of Raw Waste Sample ID Percent Density Density Color PIO Total PCB's Solids (Bulk) (Compacted) Readina WC1-3 90.89% 110.9 140.13 lb./cu.ft. Light Brown w/ 1.2 ppm lb./cu.ft. Red Clay WC1-4 91 .13% 109.3 142.3 Light Brown w/ ND Red Balls WC2-3 90.36% 106.9 142.9 Dark Brown ND WC2-4** 90.34% 98.7 142.5 Dark Brown ND ** A Fixed Solids analysis was performed to determine moisture and potential volatile solids content of the soil. The following data was collected: Percent Solids: Percent Moisture: Percent Fixed Solids: Percent Volatile Solids: 90.75% 9.25% (Wet Weight Basis) 87.55% 3.53% (ppm) 262 443 267 465 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 4-2 WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY PCB DATA SUMMARY -RAW SOIL WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 Analytes ug/kg (ppb) ug/kg (ppb) ug/kg (ppb) ug/kg (ppb) Total MonoCB 28 44 6 3 Total DiCB 2,900 3,100 205 118 Total TriCB 19,940 20,850 2,060 764 Total TetraCB 19,590 25,090 4,260 1,970 Total PentaCB 60,880 71 ,890 30,600 20,010 Total HexaCB 256,250 419,610 189,500 129,450 Total OctraCB 155,970 261 ,390 121,220 87,770 Total NonaCB 30,050 49,050 23,400 18,080 Deca CB 1,400 2,260 1,030 768 19 32 26 21 Total PCB 547,027 853,316 372,307 258,954 *Data analyzed by Triangle Laboratories, Inc. Soil Blank ug/kg (ppb) ND (0.09) ND (0.09) ND(0.1) ND (0.1) ND (0.2) ND (0.1) ND (0.1) ND(0.1) ND (0.1) ND(0.2) ND I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42176B WCl-3 RAW I I Client Project: Sample Matrix: TIJ ID: E4038 SOLID 172-37-1B I Sample Size: Dry Weight: 0.030 kg 0.027 kg I Total MonoCB Total DiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB I Total PentaCB Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOT AL PCB + EMPC : 3C 1 :-3.3 . .4,4. -TetraCB ll Ci:-2.2' .3.3' .SS ,6.6' -OctaCB 13Ci:-2.2' ,4,4· ,5S-HexaCB 13Ci:-2,2· .5S-TetraCB 13C1:-3,3' ,4.4· ,5S-HexaCB 27.7 2900 19940 19590 60880 256250 155970 30050 1400 18.6 547030 594570 39.2 37.0 32.4 Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP30300 Date Received: 06/19/97 Date Extracted: 07/01/97 Date Analyzed: 07/07/97 Dilution Factor: 10 Blank File: YP29600 Analyst: DD 1 5 12 20 19 21 19 9 3 106 99.8 87.5 46.8 3190 20280 25900 99620 257770 30390 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Spike File: ICal: ConCal: SPPCBF0l PCBY617 YP289 % Moisture: 8.6 % Lipid: n/a % Solids: 91.4 0.74 1.04 1.20 31.40 23.87 29.82 25.32 0.80 19.83 1.29 28.30 I I I I I I I I I I I Data Reviewer: ___ Jl,A,__._........_..._J....,__ _____ 07/17/97 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~ 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2TT13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of 1 PCBP _PSR •:!.00. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 09:28 07/17/97 .57 I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42176B WC1-4RAW I Client Project: Sample Matrix: I TLIID: I Sample Size: Dry Weight: I 1~~(¼#:::r I Total MonoCB Total DiCB Total TriCB Total T etraCB I Total PentaCB Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB I Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB I TOTAL PCB TOT AL PCB + EMPC E4038 SOLID 172-37-2B 0.030 kg 0.027kg uc:-3,3" .4,4' -TetraCB uc:-2,2· .3.3' ,SS ,6.6' -OctaCB uc:-2,2 ' ,4,4 · ,5,5'-HexaCB 13C1:-2.2' .5,5'-TetraCB uc i:-3,3. ,4,4. ,5,5'-HexaCB 44.3 3100 20850 25090 71890 419610 261390 49050 2260 32.2 853330 915470 35.8 26.2 33.l Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP30400 Date Received: 06/19/97 Date Extracted: 07/01/97 Date Analyzed: 07/07/97 Dilution Factor: 10 Blank File: YP29600 Analyst: DD 2 6 11 22 21 22 18 10 3 96.6 70.6 89.2 49.7 3350 21240 32110 119900 426080 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Spilce File: ICal: ConCal: SPPCBF0l PCBY617 YP289 % Moisture: 8.6 % Lipid: n/a % Solids: 91.4 0.84 1.24 1.45 31.37 23.87 29.82 25.32 0.78 19.83 1.30 28.30 RO_ I I I I I I I I Data Reviewer:----~_/ ________ 07/17/97 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.a 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of 1 PCBP .PSa '"2.00. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 09:29 07/17/97 79 I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42176B WC2-3 RAW I I I Client Project: Sample Matrix: TLIID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: E4038 SOLID 172-37-3B 0.030 kg 0.027 kg I I ~,:mlyt~~ > I I I I Tota.I MonoCB Tota.I DiCB Tota.I TriCB Tota.I TetraCB Tota.I PencaCB Tota.I HexaCB Tota.I HepcaCB Tota.I OctaCB Tota.I NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOTAL PCB + EMPC '-'Ci:-3.3 " .4.4· -TetraCB uc:-2.2 · _3_3 · .SS ,6.6" -OccaCB 13Ci:-2.2 · .4,4· .SS-HexaCB 13Ci:-2,2· .SS-TetraCB 13Ci:-3.3" .4.-r .SS-HexaCB EMPC 205 2060 4260 30600 189500 121220 23400 1030 25.6 372290 400010 28.1 22.4 24.8 Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: Blank Ftle: Analyst 4 10 17 18 18 19 10 3 76.0 60.6 66.9 Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP30500 06/19/97 07/01/97 07/07/97 10 YP29600 DD 5.5 239 2080 5980 54270 191770 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Spike File: ICal: ConCal: SPPCBFOl PCBY617 YP289 % Moisture: 11.1 % Lipid: n/a % Solids: 88.9 0.78 1.05 1.17 31.40 23 .87 29 .82 25.28 0.78 19.83 1.27 28.30 I I I I I I I I Data Reviewer: ___ ::&) _________ 07/16/97 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~ 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of 1 PCIP _PSR •2.00. URS 6.10.03 Printed: 17:46 07/16/97 101 . I TLI Project: 42176B WC2-4RAW Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP30600 I I I Client Sample: Client Project: Sample Matrix: TLIID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: E4038 SOLID 172-37-4B 0.030 kg 0.027kg Date Received: 06/19/97 Date Extracted: 07/01/97 Date Analyzed: 07/07/97 Dilution Factor: 10 Blank File: YP29600 Analyst: DD I j:l',',la1yles : ~~~?i<PP:!>: Total MonoCB Tot.a.I DiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB Total Pent.aCB Total HexaCB Total Hept.aCB Total Oct.aCB Total NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOT AL PCB + EMPC 13Cic-3,3 · .4.-r -TetraCB ucc-2,2' .3.3' .5,5',6,6' -OctaCB 13Cic-2,2' ,4.4· ,5,5'-HexaCB 13C1c-2,2' ,5,5' -TetraCB ueic-3.3 ' .4.4· ,5,5'-HexaCB EMPC 118 764 1970 20010 129450 87770 18080 768 EMPC 258920 280060 22.9 18.6 17.7 5 7 15 15 19 18 9 3 61.9 50.2 47.8 3.0 124 812 3240 39230 130010 21.l 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Spilce File: ICal: ConCal: SPPCBF0l PCBY617 YP289 % Moisture: % Lipid: 9.5 n/a 90.5 % Solids: 0.76 0.92 1.41 23.87 29.82 25.28 0.79 19.83 1.34 28.30 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Data Reviewer: -----7'/+-i::i..,~J ______ 07/16/97 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~ 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page l of l PCBF .PSR •2.00, LARS 6.IQ.03 Printed: 17:48 07/16/97 123 I~=~~~~~==~=== I I I I TLI Project: Client Sample: Client Project: Sample Matrix: TLIID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: 42176B SBLK070197 E4038 NA2S04 Date Received: SBLK 070197 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: 0.030 kg Dilution Factor: n/a Blank File: Analyst: I I••~!'!"",; Total MonoCB Total DiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB Total PentaCB Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOT AL PCB + EMPC uc:-3.3. A.-+'-TetraCB 13Ci:-2.2· .3.3' .SS ,6.6' -OctaCB 13Ci:-2,2' .4.4' ,5.5'-HexaCB uc:-2.2' .5.5'-TetraCB 13Ci:-3.3' .4,4· .5,5'-HexaCB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND n/a n/a 39.6 33.8 26.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 119 10'2 80.6 Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP29600 I I 07/01/97 07/07/97 1.0 DD 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Splice File: SPPCBF0l !Cal: PCBY617 ConCal: YP289 % Moisture: n/a % Lipid: % Solids: 0.79 0.89 1.27 n/a n/a 23.87 29.82 25.28 0.76 19.83 1.29 28.30 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Data Reviewer: ___ ---r];._ ............ .....,_._) _______ 07/17/97 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.* 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • FEOC (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of 1 PCBF_PSR •2.00. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 08:36 07/17/97 I I TABLE 4-3 I WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY PCOOs/PCDFs DATA SUMMARY -RAW SOIL I WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 Soll Analytes ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) Blank I 2378-TCDD ND ND ND ND ND (0.3) I 12378-PeCDD ND ND ND ND ND (0 .6) 1234 78-HxCDD ND ND ND ND ND (0.5) 123678-HxCDD 2.2 2.3 4.5 ND ND (0 .4) I 123789-HxCDD 1.8 1.6 2.1 ND ND (0.5) 1234678-HpCDD 14.8 18.1 145 32.8 ND (0.8) OCDD 506 515 2,710 1,300 ND (1 .5) I 2378-TCDF 108 125 46.1 49.7 ND (0.3) 12378-PeCDF 29.7 33 .8 12.7 14.4 ND (0.5) I 23478-PeCDF 114 123 53.5 58 ND (0.5) 123478-HxCDF 1120 1230 826 923 ND (0.5) 123678-HxCDF 126 136 111 135 ND (0.4) I 234678-HxCDF 50.9 48.8 31.6 34 ND (0.6) 123789-HxCDF 6.3 5.9 3.6 2.8 ND (0.6) 1234678-HpCDF 821 864 648 704 ND (0.6) I 1234789-HpCDF 547 584 354 337 ND (0.9) OCDF 4050 5050 2930 2910 ND (1.2) I 2378-TEQ 218 238 147 159 0 I Total TCDD 12.3 1.3 0.95 1.4 ND (0.3) Total PeCDD 31.3 35.4 16.8 17.5 ND (0.6) I Total HxCDD 9.2 7.7 13.5 4.9 ND (0.5) Total HpCDD 14.9 35 323 78.3 ND (0.8) OCDD 506 515 2,710 1,300 ND (1.5) I Total TCDF 465 459 171 189 ND (0.3) Total PeCDF 763 844 470 504 ND (0.5) I Total HxCDF 1990 2180 1510 1720 ND (0.5) Total HpCDF 2350 2600 1680 1680 ND (0.7) OCDF 4050 5050 2930 2910 ND (1.2) I Total PCDD/F 10,192 11,727 9,825 8,405 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TRIANGLE LABORATORIES OF RTP, INC . Sample Result Summary for Project 42176A Method 8290X Full Screen Analyses (DB-5) Page 1 07/14/97 ==========================================================-===--===================== Data File Sample ID Units Extraction Date Analysis Date Instrument Matrix Extraction Type T974639 TLI Soil Blank ppt 06/26/97 07/07/97 T SAND Soxhlet T974687 WCl-3 RAW ppt 06/26/97 07/09/97 T SOLID Soxhlet T974688 WCl-4 RAW ppt 06/26/97 07/09/97 T SOLID Soxhlet T974689 WC2-3 RAW ppt 06/26/97 07/09/97 T SOLID Soxhlet ==-===---==---============================================-------==================== Analytes 2378-TCDD 12378-PeCDD 123478-HxCDD 123678-HxCDD 123789-HxCDD 1234678-HpCDD OCDD 2378-TCDF 12378-PeCDF 23478-PeCDF 123478-HxCDF 123678-HxCDF 234678-HxCDF 123789-HxCDF 1234678-HpCDF 1234789-HpCDF OCDF TOTAL TCDD TOTAL PeCDD TOTAL HxCDD TOTAL HpCDD TOTAL TCDF TOTAL PeCDF TOTAL HxCDF TOTAL HpCDF ( 0. 4) (0.7) ( 0. 7) (0. 5) (0 .5) (0.7) (1.0) (0 .3) (0.5) ( 0. 5) (0 . 5) ( 0. 3) (0 .4) ( 0. 5) (0 .4) (0. 5) (0. 8) ( 0. 4) (0. 7) (0. 6) (0.7) ( 0 . 3) ( 0. 5) (0. 4) (0. 5) ( 0. 7) (0 .8) (1.3) {2.2} 1.8 {14.8} 506 108 29.7 PR 114 1120 126 50.9 PR 6.3 PR 821 547 4050 {12. 3} {31.3} 9.2 14.9 465 763 1990 2350 Other Standards 37Cl-TCDD 13Cl2-PeCDF 234 13Cl2-HxCDF 478 13Cl2-HxCDD 478 13Cl2-HpCDF 789 Percent Recovery Summary (% Rec) 58.5 79.4 67 .0 78.7 95.8 71.4 84.7 83.1 93.2 61.6 Other Standards Percent Recovery Summary(% Rec) 13Cl2-HxCDF 789 110 74.9 13Cl2-HxCDF 234 104 70.6 Internal Standards 13Cl2-2378-TCDF 13Cl2-2378-TCDD 13Cl2-PeCDF 123 13C12-PeCDD 123 13Cl2-HxCDF 678 13Cl2-HxCDD 678 13Cl2-HpCDF 678 13C12-HpCDD 678 13Cl2-0CDD Percent 73 .1 65.1 58 .8 61. 7 89.3 97.7 87.6 90.5 73 .9 Recovery Summary 73.1 76.4 84.4 94.5 68.7 91.4 71.5 80.8 55.2 Triangle Laboratories, lnc.e Analytical Services Division 801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 2TT13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 (% Rec) (0.4) ( 0. 5) (1.1) 2 .3 {1. 6} 18.1 515 125 33.8 PR 123 1230 PR 136 48.8 PR 5.9 PR 864 584 5050 1.3 {35.4} 7.7 35.0 459 E 844 2180 2600 101 83.3 88.4 97.4 58.3 91. 0 82.3 85.6 89.0 94.5 105 89.1 102 71.9 76.3 46.4 ( 0. 5) ( 0. 6) ( 1. 4) 4.5 {2.1} 145 2710 46.1 12.7 PR 53.5 826 PR 111 31. 6 PR 3.6 PR 648 354 2930 0.95 {16.8} 13 .5 323 171 470 1510 1680 79.8 67.6 74.4 83.5 47.2 76.8 68.3 74.3 79.1 82.6 85.5 79.2 87.2 57.4 61. 7 35.9 Printed: 12:27 07/14/97 30 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TRIANGLE LABORATORIES OF RTP, INC. Sample Result Summary for Project 42176A Method 8290X Full Screen Analyses (DB-5) Page 2 07/14/97 =============----=================-===--------===========------------====---========= Data File Sample ID Units Extraction Date Analysis Date Instrument Matrix Extraction Type T974690 WC2-4 RAW ppt 06/26/97 07/09/97 T SOLID Soxhlet ==========================--===--=-=====-==--==============------==================== Analytes 2378-TCDD 12378-PeCDD 123478-HxCDD 123678-HxCDD 123789-HxCDD 1234678-HpCDD OCDD 2378-TCDF 12378-PeCDF 23478-PeCDF 123478-HxCDF 123678-HxCDF 234678-HxCDF 123789-HxCDF 1234678-HpCDF 1234789-HpCDF OCDF TOTAL TCDD TOTAL PeCDD TOTAL HxCDD TOTAL HpCDD TOTAL TCDF TOTAL PeCDF TOTAL HxCDF TOTAL HpCDF (0.5) (0. 7) (1.5) (1.4) (1.4) 32.8 1300 49.7 14 .4 PR 58.0 923 PR 135 34.0 PR 2.8 PR 704 337 2910 { 1. 4} {17.5} 4.9 78.3 189 E 504 1720 1680 Other Standards 37Cl-TCDD 13Cl2-PeCDF 234 13Cl2-HxCDF 478 13C12-HxCDD 478 13C12-HpCDF 789 Percent Recovery Summary(% Rec) 98.9 74.7 79.3 89.1 46.2 Other Standards Percent Recovery Summary(% Rec) 13Cl2-HxCDF 789 79.9 13C12-HxCDF 234 73.2 Internal Standards 13Cl2-2378-TCDF 13C12-2378-TCDD 13Cl2-PeCDF 123 13Cl2-PeCDD 123 13Cl2-HxCDF 678 13Cl2-HxCDD 678 13Cl2-HpCDF 678 13Cl2-HpCDD 678 13Cl2-OCDD Percent Recovery Summary(% Rec) 82.1 83.3 88.2 90.3 80.4 90.9 61. 0 61.1 35.8 ==================-=-------========================================================== {Estimated Maximum Possible Concentration}, Triangle Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services OMsion 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 (Detection Limit). Printed: 12:27 07/14/97 31 I I I I TLI Project: Client Sample: Client Project: Sample Matrix: TLIID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: GC Column: 42176A WC1-3RAW E4038- SOUD 172-37-lA 11.000 g 10.054 g DB-5 Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) Analysis File: T974687 Date Received: 06/19/97 Spike File: SPX2372S Date Extracted: 06/26/97 !Cal: TF53286 Date Analyzed: 07/09/97 ConCal: T974684 Dilution Factor: n/a % Moisture: 8.6 Blank File: T974639 % Lipid: n/a Analyst: DL % Solids: 91.4 I 11■-t11111111•---~ I I I I I I I I I I I I 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 1,2,3,4, 7 ,8-HxCDD ND 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD EMPC 1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDD 1.8 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD EMPC 1.2,3,4,6,7,8.9-0CDD 506 2,3,7,8-TCDF 108 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 29.7 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 114 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1120 1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF 126 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 50.9 1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF 6.3 1,2,3,4,6,7.8-HpCDF 821 1.2.3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 547 1.2.3,4,6. 7,8,9-0CDF 4050 Total TCDD EMPC TotalPeCDD EMPC TotalHxCDD 9.2 TotalHpCDD 14.9 Total TCDF 465 Total PeCDF 763 TotalHxCDF 1990 Total HpCDF 2350 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.a 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fa»: (919) 544-5491 0.7 0.8 1.3 2.2 14.8 12.3 31.3 3 27.1 1 29.7 14 506 10 826 12 2000 4 Page 1 of2 1.16 0.85 0.79 1.44 1.47 1.32 1.30 1.38 1.27 0.99 0.98 0.87 29:54 34:54 21:06 25:15 25:59 28:48 28:54 29:24 30:07 31:34 32:45 35:02 PR_ PR_ PR_ ,s__ X%37 .J'SR '2.0Q. LARS 4.10.03 Printed: 17:53 07/13/97 54 I TLI Project: 42176A WC1-4RAW Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) Analysis File: T974688 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Client Sample: Client Project: Sampie Matrix: 1LI ID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: GC Column: 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6.7.8-HpCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4, 7 ,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4, 7 ,8-HxCDF 1.2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF Total TCDD Total PeCDD Total HxCDD TotalHpCDD Total TCDF Total PeCDF TotalHxCDF TotalHpCDF E4038 SOUD 172-37-2A 10.980 g 10.036 g DB-5 ND ND ND 2.3 EMPC 18.1 515 125 33.8 123 1230 136 48.8 5.9 864 584 5050 13 EMPC 7.7 35.0 459 844 2180 2600 Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: Blank File: Analyst: 2 2 2 12 10 12 4 0.4 0.5 1.1 06/19/97 06/26/97 07/09/97 n/a T974639 DL 1.6 13.4 35.4 272 559 887 2190 Page 1 of2 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.a 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Spike Ftle: SPX2372S !Cal: TF53286 ConCal: T974684 % Moisture: 8.6 % Lipid: % Solids: 1.11 0.93 0.85 0.79 1.49 1.49 1.32 1.32 1.33 1.23 0.95 0.98 0.88 n/a 91.4 29:36 . 32:24 34:54 21:06 25:15 25:59 28:48 28:54 29:24 30:06 31:34 32:45 35:02 PR_ PR_ PR_ PR_ E,Q .2... X%J7.J'$1l '2.00, LAaS6.10.QJ Printed: i1O107/14/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: 42176A Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) Client Sample: Client Project: Sampie Matrix: 1LIID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: GC Column: 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD l,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0(:I)D 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1,2.3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2,3,4,6,7.8-HxCDF 1,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8.9-O(:I)F Total TCDD Total PeCDD TotalHxCDD TotalHpCDD Total TCDF Total PeCDF Total HxCDF Total HpCDF WC2-3RAW E4038 SOLID 172-37-3A 1L650 g 10.357 g DB-5 ND ND ND 4.5 EMPC 145 2710 46.1 12.7 53.5 826 111 31.6 3.6 648 354 2930 0.95 EMPC 13.5 323 171 470 1510 1680 Date Received: 06/19/97 Date Extracted: 06/26/97 Date Analyzed: 07/09/97 Dilution Factor: n/a Blank File: T974639 Analyst: DL 0.5 0.6 1.4 2.1 1 3.1 16.8 2 24.2 2 11 215 11 505 12 1520 4 Page 1 of2 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.a 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Analysis File: T974689 Spike File: SPX2372S !Cal: TF53286 ConCal: T974684 % Moisture: 11.1 % Lipid: n/a % Solids: 88.9 1.24 29:35 0.99 32:24 0.84 34:54 0.79 21:04 1.47 25:14 PR_ 1.56 25:58 1.34 28:47 PR_ 1.30 28:53 1.34 29:23 PR_ 1.26 30:06 PR_ 0.96 31:33 1.00 32:44 0.88 35:01 ~ X237..l'Sll "100. LARS 6.IQ.03 Printed: 11 :52 07/14197 145 I .......-'l!y&-.:c:;:=;(=:-P~-:::?=1t~~~1 I TLI Project: 42176A Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Client Sample: WC2-4RAW Client Project: E4038 Sample Matrix: SOLID Date Received: 06/19/97 'ILIID: 172-37-4A Date Extracted: 06/26/97 Date Analyzed: 07/09/97 Sample Size: 11.080 g Dilution Factor: n/a Dry Weight: 10.027 g BlankFtle: T974639 GC Column: DB-5 Analyst: DL 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.5 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 0.7 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 1.5 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 1.4 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND 1.4 1,2,3,4,6,7.8-HpCDD 32.8 1,2,3,4.6,7,8,9-OCDD 1300 2,3,7,8-TCDF 49.7 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 14.4 2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 58.0 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 923 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 135 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 34.0 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 2.8 1,2,3,4,6,7.8-HpCDF 704 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 337 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF 2910 Total TCDD EMPC 1.4 Total PeCDD EMPC 17.5 TotalHxCDD 4.9 1 11.2 TotalHpCDD 78.3 2 Total TCDF 189 12 218 Total PeCDF 504 9 547 Total HxCDF 1720 12 1730 Total HpCDF 1680 4 Page 1 of2 Triangle Laboratories, lnc.e 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 54,4.5491 Analysis File: T974690 Spike File: SPX2372S !Cal: TF53286 ConCal: T974684 % Moisture: 9.5 % Lipid: n/a % Solids: 90.5 1.02 32:25 0.84 34:55 0.78 21:05 1.53 25:13 PR_ 1.42 25:59 1.31 28:48 PR_ 133 28:54 1.28 29:25 PR_ 1.25 30:07 PR_ 0.97 31:35 0.97 32:46 0.89 35:03 E_ "2Y7.)'51l '2.00, LARS 4.10.03 Printed: 12:11 07/14/97 196 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42176A TLI Soil Blank Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) Analysis File: T97 4639 Client Project: Sample Matrix: 1LI ID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: GC Column: 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,6.7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8.9-HxCDD 1,2.3.4.6.7.8-HpCDD 1,2,3.4.6,7,8,9-0CDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4.7,8,9-HpCDF 1,2,3,4.6,7.8,9-OCDF Total TCDD Total PeCDD TotalHxCDD Total HpCDD Total TCDF Total PeCDF Total HxCDF Total HpCDF E4038 SAND TU Blank 10.030 g n/a DB-5 Triangle Laboratories, lnc.e Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyred: Dilution Factor: Blank Ftle: Analyst: ND 0.4 ND 0.7 ND 0.7 ND 0.5 ND 0.5 ND 0.7 ND 1.0 ND 0.3 ND 0.5 ND 0.5 ND 0.5 ND 0.3 ND 0.4 ND 0.5 ND 0.4 ND 0.5 ND 0.8 ND 0.4 ND 0.7 ND 0.6 ND 0.7 ND 0.3 ND 0.5 ND 0.4 ND 0.5 Page 1 of2 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 !Cal: TF53286 I I Spike File: SPX2372S 06/26/97 lstCCal: T974628 07/07/97 EndCCal: T974644 n/a % Moisture: n/a T974639 % Lipid: n/a KAS % Solids: n/a lC:37.J'Sll '1.00. LARS 6.10.Q) Printed: 15:00 07/13/97 33 I I I TABLE 4-4 WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY voe DATA SUMMARY-RAW SOIL I WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 UTS Non-WW I Analytes ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg Chloromethane ND(0.3) ND(0.24) 6.04 ND(0.24) 30,000 Vinyl Chloride ND(0.28) ND(0.22) ND(0.21) ND(0.22) I Bromomethane ND(0.31) ND(0.25) ND(0.24) ND(0.25) Chloroethane ND(0.33) ND(0.26) ND(0.25) ND(0.26) Trichlorofluoromethane ND(0.11) ND(0.09) ND(0.08) ND(0.09) I 1, 1-Dichloroethene ND(0.22) ND(0.18) ND(0.17) ND(0.18) Carbon disulfide 0.37 ND(0.05) ND(0.05) ND(0.05) 4,800 Acetone 17.42 ND(0.18) 4.1 ND(0.18) 160,000 I Methylene chloride 3.53 2.6 2.55 2.45 30,000 trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene ND(0.16) ND(0.13) ND(0.12) ND(0.13) 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND(0.1) ND(0.08) ND(0.07) ND(0.08) I cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethane ND(0.16) ND(0.13) ND(0.12) ND(0.13) Chloroform 0.31 ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) 6,000 1,2-Dichloroethane ND(0.12) ND(0.1) ND(0.09) ND(0.1) I Vinyl acetate ND(0.09) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) 2-Butanone 64.43 ND(0.79) ND(0.75) ND(0.79) I 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND(0.12) ND(0.09) ND(0.08) ND(0.09) Carbon tetrachloride 5.76 ND(0.13) 2.59 3.5 6,000 Benzene 1.47 1.47 1.6 1.18 10,000 I Trichloroethene ND(0.37) ND(0.26) ND(0.25) ND(0.27) 1,2-Dichloropropane ND(0.22) ND(0.16) ND(0.15) ND(0.16) Bromodichloromethane ND(0.12) ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.08) I cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ND(0.13) ND(0.09) ND(0.09) ND(0.09) trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ND(0.15) ND(0.11) ND(0.1) ND(0.11) 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane ND(0.18) 0ND(.13) ND(0.12) ND(0.13) I Dibromochloromethane ND(0.27) ND(0.19) ND(0.18) ND(0.19) Bromoform ND(0.35) ND(0.25) ND(0.24) ND(0.25) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND(0.12) ND(0.09) ND(0.09) ND(0.09) I Toluene 2.63 ND(0.06) 2.3 2.13 10,000 Tetrachloroethene 1.75 ND(0.25) 1.21 ND(0.26) 6,000 I 2-Hexanone ND(0.16) ND(0.11) ND(0.11) ND(0.12) Chlorobenzene 27.64 28.29 2.02 2.55 6,000 Ethyl benzene ND(0.17) ND(0.12) ND(0.12) ND(0.13) I m-/p-Xylene 0.77 ND(.09) 0.33 ND(0.09) a-Xylene ND(0.14) ND(0.1) ND(0.1) ND(0.1) 30,000 Styrene ND(0.08) ND(0.05) ND(0.05) ND(0.06) I 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND(0.09) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) I I I Client ID: I Filename : TU Id : I Matrix : Units : I Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bro mo methane I Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 11,1-Dichloroethene Carbon disulfide Acetone I Methylene chloride trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane I cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1 1,2-Dichloroethane Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone I 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Benzene I Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Triangle Laboratories of RTP Project Summary for Project 42175 WC1-3RAW WC1-4RAW WC2-3RAW FV451 172-36-1 SOIL ug/Kg FV452 172-36-2 SOIL ug/Kg FV454 172-36-4 SOIL ug/Kg WC2-4RAW FV453 172-36-3 SOIL ug/Kg WC2-40PT FV4.55 172-36-5 SOIL ug/Kg (0.30) (0.24) •:rnmr@T0Tul1iiU.: (0.24) ti@ilHf1miliifffi'~ (0.28) (0.22) (0.21) (0.22) (0.20) (0.31) (0.25) (0.24) (0.25) (0.23) (0.33) (0.26) (0.25) (0.26) (0.24) (0.11> co.09> <0.08> co.09> :::trn::wnnn@xtta (0.22) (0.18) (0.17) (0.18) (0.16) :r:w:rnmmbmt~ co.05> <o.05> co.05> ••=:•:tmrtrntdn)t■ mifuWIEEifitffl (0.18) d~i&iiltilifu#.l1¢ (0.18) (0.16) :;:gm:•m:m::•=:::m:rn;1s11¥ :mmr:m•rnm:•••rnwzffij1 :rnmwm:mmmrzsi.• 1=mmmrnrn•••••==n;=z14s.1 ••m•:•rmrnmr:•r:•:•m~••~ (0.16) (0.13) (0.12) (0.13) (0.12) (0.10) (0.08) (0.07) (0.08) (0.07) (0.16) (0.13) (0.12) (0.13) (0.12) :r;nm:trrmn::rn;ltli1 (0.06) (0.06> (o.06> •:rn=•••••:•r•••1••:::::m:::::::::•••:~1i#J (0.12) (0.10) (0.09) (0.10) (0.09) (0.09) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) ::m:w1m11:m:rn1rn._ (0.79) (0.75) co.79) (0.76) (0.12) (0.09) (0.08) (0.09) (0.08) ....................... ••••--• ,Y.v..... NH o" _,,l'c .,._ V ._ /'·,-.-.,'I. . ._._ .·rn1:r:::·:·::r::::::;:2z~7'ii co.13> •::112.tm::nm;m:ru.?:: :::tmmmmmmm::ri;m:r: ::::::m::m:rn:::rnm::::iu.• 11r1l:m1••••:m::11Hft~ ••••J•••tnf:::ur:rn=m•f::hl~• ••=tm:ttmmmmnf~~• ttmrnmmm::11:•:•·••1«$:: :::::::J{::tiitt@ml.t& (0.37) (0.26) (0.25) (0.27) (0.26) (0.22) (0.16) (0.15) (0.16) (0.15) Bromodichloromethane I cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (0.U) (0.08) (0.08) (0.08) (0.08) (0.13) (0.09) (0.09) (0.09) (0.09) (0.15) (0.11) (0.10) (0.11) (0.10) I 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Dibromochloromethane Bromoform I 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Toluene Tetrachloroethene I 2-Hexanone Chlorobenzene I Ethyl benzene m-/p-Xylene o-Xylene I (0.18) (0.13) (0.12) (0.13) (0.13) (0.27) (0.19) (0.18) (0.19) (0.18) (0.35) (0.25) (0.24) (0.25) (0.24) (0.12) (0.09) (0.09) (0.09) (0.09) :Z;Efr;i;E;B.,iim (0.06) ::::lliim~:f:g!filif-lg •::=::zm!IE:'::E:•::•::•::m : :::::::::BI•::::;::::t'I:Jt1.• tmtwttmIBrEta co.2S> :E!:i802EE!1■ co.26> rn:·:••w•nun•mutr• (0.16) (0.11) (0.11) (0.12) (0.11) (0.17) (0.14) (0.12) (0.12) co.09) ~~~!r!mI!®:filwJii (0.10) (0.10) ( )-Eatimated Detection Limit Page 1 (0.13) (0.09) (0.10) (0.12) (0.09) (0.10) I Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.5 Printed: 13:13:22 rn 11s1w 10 I Triangle Laboratories of RTP I Project Summary for Project 42175 Client ID: WC1-3RAW WC1-4RAW WC2-3RAW WC2-4RAW WC2-4OPT I Filename : FV451 FV452 FV454 FV453 FV455 TLIId : 172-36-1 172-36-2 172-36-4 172-36-3 172-36-5 I Matrix : SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL Units ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg ugJKg · ug/Kg I Styrene (O.~} (0.05} (0.05} (0.06} (0.05) 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (0.09) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) (0.06) I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( )-F.atimatad Detacdon Limit Page 1 I Trwtgle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc. Savarv3.S 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 13:13:22 '17 /15/'11 Phone: (919) 5#-5729 • Fax: (919) ~ 11 I I Project Number: 42175 I Sample File: FV451 I ::,m!B I I !ii~~;~~;~~~ -· "··· ··~·····"··· Bromochloromethane I Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bro mo methane I Chlorocchane T richlorofluoromechane I 1,1-Dichlorocchene Carbon disulfide Acetone Methylene chloride trans-1,2-Dichlorocchene 1,1-Dichlorocthane cis-1,2-Dichlorocthene Chloroform 1,2-Dichlorocchane 1,4-Difluorobcnzcne Vinyl acctate 2-Butanonc l, l, 1-T richlorocchane Carbon tctraehloride Benzene T richlorocchcne 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropcne IS 1 u u u u u u 0.37 BJ 17.42 3.53 BJ u u u 0.31 J 64.43 5.76 1.47 u IS 2 u u J J u u u u u 4.83 2.76 3.11 3.25 4.97 6.03 4.78 5.24 5.46 Method 8240A SOIL Sample ID: WCl-3 RAW 0.30 0.28 0.31 0.33 0.11 0.22 0.16 0.10 0.16 0.12 0.09 0.12 0.37 0.22 0.12 0.13 0.15 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 I I I I I I I I I I NA• Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Lll!"t; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit IS: lntenw Stancbrd; U: Undetacted; B: PreNnt In Blank; J: Eatlmatad-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated• Above C.11ibration R.ange Triangle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carotina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-561 Savarv3.S Printed: 13:12 (1'//15/1997 20 .:-~·": I I I I I 1, 1,2-T richlorocthanc Dibromochloromcthanc Bromoform Chlorobenzcnc-d 5 4-Merhyl-2-pentanonc Toluene T etrachloroct.henc 2-Hexanone Chlorobenzenc Et.hylbenzcne m-/p-Xylenc o-Xylene Scyrcne 1, 1,2,2-T etrachlorocrhanc 2.63 1.75 27.64 0.77 u u u IS 3 u BJ J u B u BJ u u u 10.31 8.06 8.89 10.35 10.86 0.18 0.27 0.35 0.12 0.16 0.17 0.14 0.08 0.09 10 10 20 10 IO IO 1 ~ffl:IJ;Wll•----1 1,2-Dichlorocthanc-d, 0.22 5.45 1 88 Toluenc-d 0.24 7.96 3 96 a I I I I I I 4-Bromofluorobcnzcnc 0.20 12.62 3 80 Rcviewedby ___ ___,;;e;;;...;;;;M-=---- NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit IS: Intem.tl Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Eatimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above ~ibration llange Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Ine- 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Pax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.S Printed: 13:U '1l /15/1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42347A 1-4 TREATED SOIL Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP35500 Client Project: Sample Matrix: TLIID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: Total MonoCB Total DiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB Total PemaCB Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOT AL PCB + EMPC SOUD 174-10-1 0.030 kg n/a 13Ci:i-3.3" .4.4' -TetraCB 13Ci:-2,2 ' .3.3· ,SS ,6.6' -OctaCB uc:i-2,2' .4,4· .5S-HexaCB 13Ci1-2,2· ,5S-TetraCB 13C1:i-3.3' .4.4' ,5S-HexaCB ND ND ND ND EMPC 1.6 0.67 ND ND ND 2.3 2.7 28.5 23.3 27.9 Date Received: 07/08/97 Date Extracted: 07/15/97 Date Analyzed: 07/22/97 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Blank File: YP35400 Analyst: DD 0.05 3 3 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.1 0.1 0.1 85.5 69.9 83.7 0.28 0.82 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Dala Reviewer. ~ V. lJ ,,.j Triangle Laboratories, lnc.QD 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of 1 Spilce File: ICal: ConCal: SPPCBF0l PCBY617 YP346 % Moisture: 0.2 % Lipid: n/a % Solids: 99.8 0.77 0.89 23 .77 29.72 1.27 25.20 0.79 19.73 1.28 28.20 07/27/97 L _6_ c PCBP _PSR v2.00. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 21 :27 07/27/97 22 I TLI Project: Client Sample: I Client Project: Sample Matrix: 11.J ID: 42278 WC2-3 OPT E4038 SOLID 173-40-1 Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP29800 06/30/97 Spike File: SPPCBF0t 07/02/97 !Cal: PCBY617 07/07/97 ConCal: YP289 I I Sample Size: 0.030 kg Dilution Factor: 1.0 % Moisture: 0.2 I Dry Weight: Total MonoCB Total DiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB I Total PentaCB Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB I Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB I TOTALPCB TOTAL PCB+ EMPC n/a ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND n/a n/a Blank File: YP29700 % Lipid: n/a Analyst: DD % Solids: 99.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 I ~lll--■IJJl!ltll.1~111111&111,___.. I 13Ci2-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB 13C1:-2,2' .3.3' ,5,5',6,6' -OctaCB 25.5 31.3 76.4 93.9 1 13C12-2.2',4,4',5,5'-HexaCB 24.2 72.6 I I I I I 13Ci2-2,2' .5,5' -TetraCB 13C12-3,3',4,4',5,5'-HexaCB Dam Reviewer. ~ ~. Wui\: Triangle Laboratories, lnc.3 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of 1 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% 0.78 0.85 1.30 o.n 1.29 Cllfl2197 23.87 29.82 25.28 19.83 28.30 PCBP .J'SR "1.00. URS 6.10.113 Printed: 13:16 07/'l2/97 2Z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: 42174 Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Client Sample: WC2-4OPT Client Project: E4038 Sample Matrix: SOLID TI.I ID: 172-35-1 Sample Size: 0.030 kg Dry Weight: n/a Total MonoCB TotalDiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB Total PentaCB Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOTAL PCB+ EMPC 13C12-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB 13C12-2.2' ,3,3',5,5',6,6' -OctaCB 13C12-2,2' .5,5' -TetraCB 13C12-3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND o/a o/a 21.8 28.9 24.5 Date Received: 06/19/97 Date Extracted: 06/20/97 Date Analyzed: 06/23/97 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Blank Ftle: YP22100 Analyst: DD 0.09 0.09 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 65.3 86.7 73.5 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Analysis File: YP22600 Spilce File: SPPCBFOl !Cal: PCBY617 CanCal: YP212 % Moisture: 0.0 • % Lipid: % Solids: 0.80 0.87 1.29 0.81 1.32 n/a 100.0 23.93 29.85 25.35 19.90 28.33 Data Reviewer: ____ ,YJ_/ __________ CWlA/97 Page 1 ofl POP ..PSR '2.00. URS 6.10.01 Triangle Laboratories, lnc.e 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Printed: 15:04 06/24/97 61 I I I I TLI Project: 42174 Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis I I I I I I Client Sample: SBLK 062097 Client Project: E4038 Sample Matrix: NA2S04 1LIID: SBLK062097 Sample Size: 0.030 kg Dry Weight: n/a 2-MonoCB 2.3-DiCB 2.4,5-TriCB 2,2' ,4,6-TetraCB 2,2' ,3,4,5' -PentaCB 2.2' ,4,4' ,5,6' -He.xaCB 2,2' ,3,4' ,5,6,6' -HeptaCB 2,2' ,3,3' ,4,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB 2,2' ,3,3' ,4,4' ,5,6,6' -NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOTAL PCB + EMPC 13C1r3,3' ,4,4'-TetraCB 13C1r2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND n/a n/a 30.4 26.7 Date Received: I I Date Extracted: 06/20/97 Date Analyzed: 06/2.3/97 Dilution Factor: 1.0 BlankFtle: Analyst: DD 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 91.3 80.2 20%-130% 20%-130% Analysis File: YP22100 Spilce File: SPPCBFOl !Cal: PCBY617 ConCal: YP212 % Moisture: n/a % Lipid: % Solids: 0.79 0.87 n/a n/a 23.93 29.85 I WiliiiE ..... ili~~ 13Cir2.2',4,4',5,5'-HexaCB 22.6 67.8 ~130% 1.37 25.35 I :::~~ij~~·~~~~:t7~5::·:·::::::;;:::·::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::·;:::::::::~·;:::::;:,2~i::~;\}:;;·:::~5-·:,:~:::::s}C::::::~~0f ::~1Cti./4::t.:.:::~;~f :~:~::::~~~~flf,\~::,:/:::~,,:i!Jt~~@¥:!1@4.H I I 13C12-2,2' ,5,5' -TetraCB 13C12-3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB 0.80 1.27 I Data Reviewer: _____ 7(.....__, __ J _______ 06/24/97 I Triangle Laboratories, Inc.a Page 1 of 1 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 I Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 19.90 28.33 pap ..PSll rt.OQ. LARS 6.10.01 Printed: 15:03 06/24/97 79 I I I TABLE 4-6 WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY I PCDDs/PCDFs DAT A SUMMARY -TREATED SOIL WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 AVE I Analytes ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) ng/Kg (ppt) I 2378-TCDD ND (0.3) ND (0.3) ND (0.3) ND (0.3) 12378-PeCDD ND (0.4) ND (0.4) ND (0.6) ND (0.5) 123478-HxCDD ND (0 .5) ND (0.5) ND (0.6) ND (0.5) I 123678-HxCDD ND (0.4) ND (0.4) ND (0.5) ND (0.4) 123789-HxCDD ND (0.5) ND (0.4) ND (0.6) ND (0 .5) 1234678-HpCDD ND (0.6) ND (0.5) ND (1 .2) ND (0.6) I OCDD ND (0.8) 0.99 ND (2.5) ND (0 .9) 2378-TCDF ND (0.3) 3.3 ND (0.6) ND (0.3) I 12378-PeCDF ND (0.3) 2.2 ND (0.5) ND (0.5) 23478-PeCDF ND (0.3) 2.9 ND (0.5) 0.79 1234 78-HxCDF ND (0.5) 6.3 ND (0.6) 1.6 I 123678-HxCDF ND (0.4) 1.5 ND (0.4) ND (0.4) 234678-HxCDF 0.65 2.5 ND (0.6) 0.68 123789-HxCDF ND (0.6) ND (0.5) ND (0.7) ND (0.6) I 1234678-HpCDF 0.7 3.3 ND (0.8) 0.64 1234789-HpCDF ND (0.7) ND (0 .6) ND (1 .0) ND (0.7) OCDF ND (0.6) 1.1 ND (1.9) ND (0.7) I 2378-TEQ 0.072 2.96 0.00 0.63 0.91 I Raw Soil 218 238 147 159 190.5 % Removal 99.97 98.76 100 99.6 99.52 I Total TCDD ND (0.3) ND (0.3) ND (0.3) ND (0.3) Total PeCDD . ND (0.4) ND (0.4) ND (0.6) ND (0.6) Total HxCDD ND (0.5) ND (0.4) ND (0.6) ND (0.5) I Total HpCDD ND (0.6) ND (0.5) ND (1 .2) ND (0.8) OCDD ND (0 .8) 0.99 ND (2.5) ND (0.9) I Total TCDF ND (0.3) 10.9 ND (0.6) ND (0.3) Total PeCDF ND (0.3) 14.4 ND (0.5) 2.7 Total HxCDF 0.65 16.1 ND (0.6) 3.7 I Total HpCDF 0.7 3.3 ND (0.9) 0.64 OCDF ND (0.6) 1.1 ND (1 .9) ND (0.7) I Total PCDD/F 1.35 46.8 0.0 7.00 13.8 Raw Soil 10,192 11,727 9,825 8,405 10,037 I % Removal 99.99 99.60 100 99.92 99.86 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project Client Sample: 42328 WCl-3 Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) Analysis File: S974625 Client Project Sample Matrix: 1LIID: Sample Size: Dry Weight GC Column: :i1n1m1111~!::: .. 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD J,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2.3.6,7,8-HxCDD 1,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1,2,3 ,4,6, 7 ,8,9-0CDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2.3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1.2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDF Total TCDD Total PeCDD Total HxCDD Total HpCDD Total TCDF Total PeCDF Total HxCDF Total HpCDF E4038 (Dioxin Analysis) SOLID Date Received: 07/03/97 173-90-1 Date Extracted: 07/14/97 Date Analyzed: 07/22/97 10.0l0g 10.000 g DB-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.65 ND EMPC ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.65 EMPC Dilution Factor. n/a Blank File: S974617 Analyst KB 0.3 0.4 o.s 0.4 o.s 0.6 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.3 o.s 0.4 0.6 0.70 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.4 o.s 0.6 0.3 0.3 1 0.70 Page 1 of2 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.• ao 1 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-6729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Spike File: !Cal: ConCal: SPX23725 SF56117 S974615 % Moisture: 0.1 %Lipid: n/a % Solids: 99.9 1.41 28:13 XD7,.l'Sa "2.1111,L\&16.KUD Printed: 16:25 07122197 48 I I TLI Project Client Sample: 42348 1-4 TREATED SOIL Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) Analysis File: 5974626 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Client Project Sample Matrix: 1LIID: n/a SOLID 174-11-1 Date Received: 07/08/97 Date Extracted: 07/14/97 Date Analyzed: 07/22197 Sample Siz.e: 10.040 g Dilution Factor: n/a Dry Weight GCColumn: 2.3,7,8-TCDD 1,2.3,7,8-PeCDD 1,2.3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1,2.3,4,6,7,8-IIpCDD 1,2.3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1,2.3,7,8-PeCDF 2.3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2.3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1,2.3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF 1,2.3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDF Total TCDD TotalPeCDD TotalHxCDD TotalHpCDD Total TCDF Total PeCDF TotalHxCDF Total HpCDF 10.020 g DB-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.99 3.3 2.2 2.9 6.3 EMPC 2.5 ND 3.3 ND EMPC ND ND ND ND 10.9 14.4 16.1 3.3 Blank File: Analyst 0.3 0.4 o.s 0.4 0.4 o.s o.s 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.4 o.s 6 3 3 1 Page 1 of2 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.GD 801 Capitola Drive • Durtlam, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 S974617 KB 1.S 1.1 14.0 19.9 18.S Spike Ftle: SPX2372.S !Cal: SF56117 ConCal: S974615 % Moisture: 0.2 %Lipid: n/a % Solids: 99.8 0.79 33:44 0.78 19:lS 1.53 23:SO 1.62 24:38 1.22 27:34 1.32 28:14 1.17 30-.26 X23'7,J'sa d.111,U.U 6.JIUD Printed: 09:50 07/24/97 51 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project Client Sample: Client Project: Sample Matrix: 11...IID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: GC Column: 2.3,7,8-TCDD 1,2.3,7,8-PeCDD 1,2.3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1,2.3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1,2.3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDD 2.3,7,8-TCDF 1,2.3,7,8-PeCDF 2.3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1,2.3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2.3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2.3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2.3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2.3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF 1,2.3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1,2.3,4,6, 7 ,8,9-0CDF Total TCDD TotalPeCDD TotalHxCDD TotalHpCDD Total TCDF Total PeCDF TotalHxCDF TotalHpCDF 42279rl WC2-3 OPT E4038 SOLID 173-41-1 10.045 g 10.035 g DB-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Triangle Laboratories, Inc.. Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) Analysis File: W972857 Date Received: 06/30/97 Date Extracted: 07fl.6/97 Date Analyzed: 07123/97 Dilution Factor: ra/a Blank File: Analyst: 0.3 0.6 0.6 o.s 0.6 1.2 2.5 0.6 o.s o.s 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.9 0.3 0.6 0.6 1.2 0.6 o.s 0.6 0.9 Page 1 of2 W972854 AP Spike File: SPX2372S !Cal: WF54307 ConCal: W972850 % Moisture: 0.1 %Lipid: ra/a % Solids: 99.9 m7...l'D ,rim, lAU 6.10.IIJ 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Printed: 12:14 07/24/97 L-:~!>!' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: Client Sample: Client Project: Sample Matrix: TLI ID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: GC Column: 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,6,7.8-HxCDD 1,2.3.7,8,9-HxCDD 1,2,3,4.6. 7 .8-HpCDD 1.2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HxCDF 2.3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1,2.3,4,6, 7,8,9-OCDF Total TCDD Total PeCDD Total HxCDD Total HpCDD Total TCDF Total PeCDF Total HxCDF Total HpCDF 42173 WC2-40PT E4038 SOUD 172-34-1 10.100 g n/a DB-5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND EMPC 1.6 ND 0.68 ND EMPC ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.7 3.7 EMPC Triangle Laboratories, Inc.Qt Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF _Analysis (b) Analysis File: W97227 4 Date Received: 06/19/97 Splice File: SPX2372S Date Extracted: 06/19/97 !Cal: WF54307 Date Analyzed: 06/23/97 co·ncal: W972271 Dilution Factor: n/a % Moisture: 0.0 Blank File: W872273 % Lipid: n/a Analyst: WK % Solids: 100.0 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.3 0.5 0.79 1.37 28:59 0.4 1.15 29:37 0.6 0.64 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.3 1 3.4 3 0.64 Page 1 of2 X237.J'SR Y2.00. LARSUO.llO 801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 2TT13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Printed: 12:54 06/23/97 I-----=::~~ I '~~~.ik TLI Project: I Client Sample: 42173 TLI Soil Blank Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF _Analysis (b) Analysis File: W972273 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Client Project: E4038 Sample Matrix: SAND Date Received: I I 1LIID: TU Blank Date Extracted: 06/19/97 Date Analyzed: 06/23/97 Sample Size: 10.020 g Dilution Factor: n/a Dry Weight: n/a Blank File: W872273 GC Column: DB-5 Analyst: WK 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.3 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD ND 0.6 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 0.5 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 0.4 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND 0.5 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 0.8 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD ND 1.5 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.3 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 0.5 2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF ND 0.5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.5 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.4 2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF ND 0.6 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 0.6 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND 0.6 1.2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 0.9 1,2,3,4,6, 7,8,9-0CDF ND 1.2 Total TCDD ND 0.3 TotalPeCDD ND 0.6 TotalHxCDD ND 0.5 Total HpCDD ND 0.8 Total TCDF ND 0.3 Total PeCDF ND 0.5 Total HxCDF ND 0.5 Total HpCDF ND 0.7 Page 1 of2 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.a 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Spike File: SPX2372S !Cal: WF54307 ConCal: W972271 % Moisture: n/a % Lipid: n/a % Solids: n/a X237.J'SR "f2.0Q. LARS 6.10.00 Printed: 12:53 06/23/97 /\f)~ I I I TABLE 4-7 WA'RREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY voe DAT A SUMMARY -TREATED SOIL I WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 WC2-4 UTS Non-WW Analytes ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg ug/Kg I Chloromethane 11 .72 ND(0.33) ND(0.22) 6 30,000 Vinyl Chloride ND(0.28) ND(0.27) ND(0.19) ND(0.2) Bromomethane ND(0.37) ND(0.37) ND(0.26) ND(0.23) I Chloroethane ND(0.34) ND(0.33) ND(0.22) ND(0.24) Trichlorofluoromethane ND(0.12) ND(0.12) 19.9 13.6 I 1, 1-Dichloroethene ND(0.24) ND(0.23) ND(0.17) ND(0.16) Carbon disulfide ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.05) 0.21 4,800 Acetone ND(0.33) ND(0.32) 10.28 ND(0.16) 160,000 I Methylene chloride ND(0.17) ND(0.16) 8.66 8.21 30,000 trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene ND(0.16) ND(0.16) ND(0.12) ND(0.12) 1 , 1-Oichloroethane ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.06) ND(0.07) I cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethane ND(0.16) ND(0.16) ND(0.11) ND(0.12) Chloroform ND(0.08) ND(0.08) 2.22 1.48 6,000 1,2-Dichloroethane ND(0.11) ND(0.11) ND(0.07) ND(0.09) I Vinyl acetate ND(0.05) ND(0.05) ND(0.04) ND(0.06) 2-Butanone ND(1 .19) ND(1.19) ND(0.55) ND(0.76) 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.08) I Carbon tetrachloride ND(0.09) ND(0.09) 341 .78 189.67 6,000 Benzene ND(0.04) ND(0.04) 4.38 2.46 10,000 Trichloroethene ND(0.11) ND(0.11) ND(0.11) ND(0.26) I 1,2-Dichloropropane ND(0.09) ND(0.09) ND(0.1) ND(0.15) Bromodichloromethane ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.08) I cis-1 , 3-Oichloropropene ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.07) ND(0.09) trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.1) 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane ND(0.11) ND(0.11) ND(0.1) ND(0.13) I Dibromochloromethane ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.18) Bromoform ND(0.10) ND(0.10) ND(0.1) ND(0.24) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.05) ND(0.09) I Toluene 3.42 2.81 6.69 5.54 10,000 Tetrachloroethene ND(0.12) ND(0.12) 2.57 5.75 6,000 2-Hexanone ND(0.08) ND(0.08) ND(0.06) ND(0.11) I Chlorobenzene ND(0.04) ND(0.04) 6.7 5.95 6,000 Ethylbenzene ND(0.08) ND(0.09) ND(0.1) ND(0.12) m-/p-Xylene ND(0.06) ND(0.07) ND(0.08) ND(0.09) I o-Xylene ND(0.07) ND(0.07) ND(0.08) ND(0.1) 30,000 Styrene ND(0.04) ND(0.04) ND(0.05) ND(0.05) I 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) ND(0.06) I 1~111/llill,iit-lR11_1_ I Project Number: 42330 Sample File: FV589 Method 8240 SOIL Sample ID: WCl-3 :11:•~ .... Sample Wgt: 0.005 Kg Dilution Factor: 1.00 % Moisture: 0.1 I I I I I I I I I I Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane T richlorofluoromethane 1.1-Dichloroethene Carbon disulfide Acetone Methylene chloride crans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene l, 1-Dichloroethane cis-1.2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,4-Difluorobcnzcne Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone l , l, l-T richloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Benzene T richloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropcne trans-1.3-Dichloropropcne 11.72 1.25 10 u 0.28 10 u 0.37 10 u 0.34 10 u 0.12 10 u 0.24 IO u 0.07 10 u 0.33 10 u 0.17 10 u 0.16 10 u 0.08 10 u 0.16 10 u 0.08 10 u 0.11 10 IS 2 6.07 u 0.05 10 u 1.19 10 u 0.08 10 u 0.09 10 u 0.04 10 u 0.11 10 u 0.09 10 u 0.07 10 u 0.06 10 u 0.07 10 NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit I I IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Estimated• Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc. I 801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.5 Printed: 18:25 fJl /24/1997 18 1 i~l1tl1il{llllllla■lll-~lllllll-l Project Number: 42330 Method 8240 SOIL Sample File: FV589 Sample ID: WCl-3 :~~,,,w __ Sample Wgt.: 0.005 Kg Dilution Factor: 1.00 % Moisture: 0.1 11 lll~!!llllllil,____ l , l ,2-T richlorocchane U 0.11 10 Dibromochloromechane U 0.08 10 I Bromoform u 0.10 10 Chlorobcnzcne-d IS 3 10.35 5 4-Mc:thyl-2-penunone u 0.06 10 I Toluene 3.42 J 8.10 10 T c:trachlorocchene u 0.12 10 I 2-Hc:xanone u 0.08 10 Chlorobcnzcne u 0.04 IO Echylbcnzcne u 0.08 10 I m-/p-Xylene u 0.06 20 o-Xylene u 0.07 10 Styrene u 0.04 10 I l, l ,2,2-T ecrachlorocthane u 0.06 10 1 ll111L ___ l __ ,,~-- l.2-Dichlorocchane-d 0.27 5.51 I 108 • I Toluene-d 4-Bromofl~orobcnz.cne I I I I Rcviewedby __ .... ~;........;;a-..a...tf ______ _ 0.28 8.00 3 0.19 12.67 3 Date _i,;;..\.( 1 q 7 NA-Not AppUc:able; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit 112 76 I IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. I 801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.S Printed: 18:25 f1l /24/1997 19 I , · 11,11 lrilllll-11111-- Project Number: 42280 1 Sample File: FV631 Method 8240 SOIL Sample ID: WC2-3 OPT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ··----Sample Wgt.: 0.00502 Kg Dilution Factor: 1.00 % Moisture: 0.2 ■i;al-~- Bromochloromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chlo roe thane T richlorofluoromethane 1, 1-Dichlorocthene Carbon disulfide Acetone Methylene chloride trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene 1, 1-Dichlorocthane cis-1.2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1.2-Dichlorocthane 1,4-Difluorobcnzcne Vinyl acetate 2-Bucanone 1,1, 1-T richlorocthane Carbon ccmchloridc Benzene T richlorocthcne 1.2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane cis-1.3-Dichloropropcne tr:lns-1 ,3-Dichloropropcnc IS 1 u u u u 19.90 u u 10.28 8.66 J u u u 2.22 J u IS2 u u u 341.78 E 4.38 J u u u u u 4.84 0.22 0.19 0.26 0.22 2.02 0.17 0.05 2.89 3.23 0.12 0.06 0.11 4.99 0.07 6.06 0.04 0.55 0.08 5.27 5.50 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.07 NA-Not Applicable; Det. Umit: Detection Limit; Qaan. Umit: Quantitation Limit 10 10 10 IO IO 10 IO 10 10 IO 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 IO 10 10. IO 10 10 10 IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: PnHllt In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Qaantitation Limit; E: Estimated• Above Calibration Range Tri.angle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2m3 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.5 Printed: 13:16 O'J /'23/1997 1n I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lillliili1ilillf llllilll!.'11illllllll■lltlf ll■~lil!IIIIIIIY!ll Project Number: 42280 Method 8240 SOIL Sample File: FV631 Sample ID: WC2-3 OPT lllli■a-•••a Sample Wgt.: 0.00502 Kg Dilution Factor: 1.00 % Moisture: 0.2 •=i=111•r•B1L•--1.1.2-T richlorocthane U 0.10 I 0 Dibromochloromethane Bromoform Chlorobcnzcne-d 5 4-Methyl-2-penunone Toluene 6.69 T etrachlorocthcne 2.57 2-Hcxanone Chlorobcnzcne 6.70 Ethylbcnzcne m-/p-Xylene o-Xylene Styrene 1, 1,2.2-T etraehlorocthane u u IS 3 10.34 u J 8.09 J 8.93 u J 10.38 u u u u u 0.08 0.10 0.05 0.06 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.06 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 _________ ,_ 1,2-Dichlorocthane-d 0.21 5.47 1 84 .. Tolw:ne-d 0.29 7.99 3 116 8 4-Bromofluorobcnzcne 0.19 12.65 3 76 Reviewed by _________ _ Date __ / __ / __ NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Qu.antitation Limit IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Qwmtitation Limit; E: E,tim.ated-Above Calibration R.ange Triangle L.aboratoriea of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Dur.ham, North Carolina 2m3 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919} 544-5491 Savarv3.S Printed: 13:16 07/23/1997 : 1 !:~ject Number. 4n46 -Method 8240 SOIL Sample ID: 1-4 TREATED SOIL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sample File: FV590 Chloromechane Vinyl Chloride Bromomechane Chloroechane T richlorofluoromethane 1, 1-Dichloroethene Carbon disulfide Acetone Methylene chloride trans-! ,2-Dichloroethene 1, 1-Dichloroethane cis-1,2-Dichloroechene Chloroform 1.2-Dichloroethane l A-Difluorobenzene Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone 1, 1, 1-T richloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Benzene T richloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromechane cis-1 .3-Dichloropropene trans-1.3-Dichloropropene : 1:: ::::::11@1 M~t?= IS I u u u u u u u u u u u u u u IS 2 u u u u u u u u u u 4,89 6.07 0.33 0,27 0.37 0.33 0.12 0.23 0.07 0.32 0.16 0. 16 0.08 0.16 0.08 0.11 0.05 1.19 0.08 0.09 0.04 0.11 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.07 NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit IO IO IO IO IO 10 IO 10 10 IO 10 10 IO 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 IO 10 10 10 IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 REVISED PAGE Savarv3.5 Printed: U:37 08/08/1997 I I I . . . ··. · .... Project Number: 42346 1 Sample File: FV590 I I I I I I I I 1.1.2-T richloroethane D ibromochloromethane Bromoform Chlorobenzene-d 5 4-Mech yl-2-pen tan one Toluene T etrachloroethene 2-Hexanone Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene m-/p-Xylene o-Xylene Styrene l , 1.2.2-T etrachloroechane 1.2-Dichloroethane-d 4 Toluene-cl 8 4-Bromofluorobenzene u u u IS 3 u 2.81 J u u u u u u u u !1:i !lme;lv>>> <? f Hf ' ](µg)] 0.27 0.29 0.22 Reviewed by ____ 7\h)_._."-"=-----Date ~/ _f:l_! .51 10.35 8.09 5.50 8.00 12.66 Method 8240 SOIL Sample ID: 1-4 TREATED SOIL 0.11 0.08 0.10 0.06 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.06 1 3 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 111111.ll 108 116 88 I I I I I I I NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit Detection Limit; Quan. Limit Quantitation Limit IS: internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.5 Printed: 12:37 08/08/1997 MrA-o d De \7 A. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Number: 42175 Sample File: FV455 Sample Wgt.: 0.00502 Kg Bromochloromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane T richlorofluoromethane 1, 1-Dichloroethene Carbon disulfide Acetone Methylene chloride trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane cis-1,2-Di chloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,4-Difluorobenzene Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone 1,1, l-T richloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Benzene T richloroethene 1.2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropenc trans-1,3-Dichloropropc:nc Oil ution Factor: IS 1 6.00 J 13.60 u u u u 0.21 BJ u 8.21 BJ u u u 1.48 J 189.67 2.46 u IS 2 u u u J u u u u u LOO 4.82 1.10 2.06 2.76 3.25 4.97 6.02 5.23 5.47 Method 8240A SOIL Sample ID: WC2-4 OPT % Moisture: NA 0.20 0.23 0.24 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.07 0.12 0.09 0.06 0.76 0.08 0.26 0.15 0.08 0.09 0.10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 NA-Not Applicable; DeL Umit Detection Umit; Quan. Limit Quantitation Limit IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Praent In Blank; J: Eltimatad-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Eatimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919} 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv35 Printed: 11:<M (fJ /15 /199'/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Number: 42175 Sample File: FV455 Sample Wgt.: 0.00502 Kg l, 1,2-T richlorocthane Dibromochloromethane Bromoform Chlorobcnzcne-d s 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Toluene T etrac.hloroethene 2-Hexanone Chlorobcnzcne Ethylbcnzcne m-/p-Xylene o-Xylene Styrene l, 1,2,2-Tetrac.hlorocthane l ,2-Dichlorocthane-d4 Toluene-d a 4-Bromofluorobcnzcne Reviewed by _____ ~ ___ M2_.___ __ Dilution Factor: 5.54 5.75 5.95 0.19 0.24 0.19 u u u IS 3 u BJ J u BJ u u u u u Date '=1-/ J.S..1.9J: LOO 10.33 8.05 8.89 10.37 5.44 7.96 12.64 Method 8240A SOIL Sample ID: WC2-4 OPT % Moisture: NA 0.13 0.18 0.24 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.09 0.10 0.05 0.06 1 3 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 76 96 76 NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetacted; B: Preaent In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Qaantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration hnge Trwtgle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) ~1 Savarv3.5 Printed: 11:<K (17 /151-1997 65 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Number: 42175 Sample File: FV450 Bromochloromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chlorocthane T richlorofluoromethane 1, 1-Dichlorocthene Carbon disulfide Acetone Methylene chloride trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1, 1-Dichlorocthane cis-1,2-Dichlorocthenc Chloroform 1,2-Dichlorocthane 1,4-Difluorobcnzcne Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone 1, 1, 1-T richlorocthane Carbon cctraeh.loridc Benzene T richlorocthene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropcne IS 1 u u u u u u 0.49 J u 1.29 J u u u u u IS 2 u u u u u 0.42 J u u u u 4.81 2.74 3.22 6.01 6.28 Method 8240A H20 Sample ID: VBLI< 070197 .,:: :::if 0.22 10 0.21 10 0.23 10 0.24 10 0.08 10 0.16 10 10 0.17 10 10 0.12 10 0.07 10 0.12 10 0.06 10 0.09 10 0.06 10 0.72 10 0.08 10 0.12 10 0.04 10 10 0.14 10 0.08 10 0.08 10 0.10 10 NA• Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Umit IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Praent In Blank; J: Eatimateo-Bel-Quantitation Limit; E: Eatimated• Above Calibration lwlge Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 21713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.5 Printed: U:Q3 07/15/1997 78 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Number: 42175 Sample File: FV450 Sample Wgt.: 0.005 Kg l, l ,2-T richlorocthane Dibromochloromethane Bromofurm Chlorobcnzcne-d 5 4-Methyl-2-pencanone Toluene T etr2Chlorocthene 2-Hc:xanone Chlorobcnzcne Ethylbcnzcne m-/p-Xylene o-Xylene Styrene l, l ,2,2-T etr2Chlorocthane 1,2-D ichlorocthane-d 4 Tolucne-d a 4-Bromofluorobcn:zene Reviewed by ____ G=b...,,___-.... ~------ Dilution Factor: u u u LOO IS 3 10.31 u 1.42 J 8.04 u u 0.54 J 10.35 u 0.76 J 10.87 u 0.45 J 11.65 0.24 0.24 0.23 u Date ....3::..t ~ _Il 5.44 7.96 12.61 Method 8240A H20 Sample ID: VBLI< 070197 . ····:·:·~::;:;:~~-~-:-:·:~:::·:~·:·:~-:·:~:·::;;::;:;~~i;;;;~~iii .. :::::~=~:::::iiit. % Moisture: NA 0.12 0.17 0.23 0.08 0.23 0.10 0.11 0.09 0.06 1 3 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 10 96 96 92 NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; 0--. Limit: Quantitation Limit IS: Internal Standlld; U: Undetected; I: Praett In Blank; J: Eetimated-Below Qaadtation Limit; E: Eatimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc:. 801 Capitola Drive• Durham,NorthCanma2'713 Phoae: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) ~ Savarv3.5 Printed: 11:00 (1J /15 /1997 ..,n I I I TABLE 4-8 WARREN COUNTY PCB LANDFILL TREATABILITY STUDY I PCB DATA SUMMARY -Condensate I Analytes Condensate Treated Blank Composite(ppb) Water(ppb) (ppb) I Total MonoCB Total DiCB 0.39 0.05 ND(<0.001) 0.82 0.13 NO(<0.001) I Total TriCB Total TetraCB Total PentaCB 5 1 ND(0.001) 11.2 2.9 NO(0.002) 40.1 12.2 ND(0.002) I Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB 167 57 .3 NO(0.002) 75.1 26.9 NO(0.002) Total OctaCB I Total NonaCB DecaCB 10.2 4.2 ND(0.002) 0.24 0.11 ND(0.003) ND(0.003) ND(0.003) I Total PCB 310 99 ND I Removal Efficiency (%) 68 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: 42505 Client Sample: CONDENSATE COMPOSITE Client Project: E4038 Sample Matrix: WATER Date Received: TLI ID: 175-69-1 Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Sample Size: 1.000 L Dilution Factor: Dry Weight: n/a Blank File: Analyst: 0.39 3 0.82 5 5.0 15 11.2 24 40.1 27 167 25 75 .1 20 10.2 10 0.24 3 Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP37200 07/18/97 Spike File: SPPCBF0l 07/22197 !Cal: PCBY617 07/29/97 ConCal: YP366 1.0 % Moisture: n/a YP37100 % Lipid: n/a DD % Solids: n/a 1.1 5.1 15.0 55.0 169 Total MonoCB Total DiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB Total PemaCB Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB ND 0.003 TOTAL PCB TOT AL PCB + EMPC 13C,1-3,3" .4.4' -TetraCB 13C11-2.2· .3.3· ,5,5",6,6" -OctaCB 13C11-2,2',4,4',5S-HexaCB 13Ci1-2,2· ,5,5' -TetraCB 13C11-3,3. ,4,4. ,5,5"-HexaCB 310 331 1.2 0.71 0.93 117 70.7 93.2 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% 0.80 0.87 1.28 0.78 1.25 Data Reviewer: ____ 77;0~-'--------08/08/97 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.GP 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of 1 23.77 29.72 25.20 19.73 28.20 PCBP J'SR ¥200. LAllS 6.10.03 Printed: 12:27 08/08/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42505 TREATED WATER Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP37300 Client Project: Sample Matrix: TLI ID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: Total MonoCB Total DiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB Total PentaCB Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOT AL PCB + EMPC E4038 WATER 175-69-2 1.000 L n/a uei1-3.3' .4,4' -TetraCB 13C11-2.2' .3.3· ,5,5',6,6' -OctaCB 13Ci 1-2,2' ,4,4' ,5,5'-HexaCB 13Cii-2,2' .5,5' -TetraCB 13C11-3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5'-HexaCB 0.05 0.13 1.0 2.9 12.2 51.3 26.9 4.2 0.11 ND 99.0 105 1.0 0.79 1.1 Date Received: 07/18/97 Date Extracted: 07/22/97 Date Analyzed: 07/29/97 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Blank File: YP37100 Analyst: DD 3 5 12 22 25 29 20 10 3 0.003 99.9 79.2 108 0.18 1.1 3.6 17.4 51.4 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Spilce File: !Cal: ConCal: SPPCBF0l PCBY617 YP366 % Moisture: % Lipid: n/a n/a n/a % Solids: 0.78 0.89 1.28 0.80 1.26 23.77 29.72 25.20 19.73 28.20 Data Reviewer: ____ =n,J___,/___...'-------08/08/97 Triangle Laboratories, lnc.4' 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of 1 PCBP J'SR Y2.00. I.AJIS 6.10.03 Printed: 12:28 08/08/97 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42505 SBLK072297 Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP37100 Client Project: E4038 Sample Matrix: HPLCH20 TLI ID: SBLK072297 Sample Size: 1.000 L Dry Weight: n/a Total MonoCB Total DiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB Total PentaCB Total HexaCB Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOT AL PCB + EMPC 13C 1 ~-3,3 · ,4,4 • -TetraCB 13Ci~-2.2·,3,3· ,5,5',6,6' -OctaCB 13C12-2,2' ,4,4' ,5,5 ' -HexaCB 13C,r2.2' ,5,5'-TerraCB 13C1~-3.3',4,4',5,5'-HexaCB ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND n/a n/a 1.1 0.88 0.83 Date Received: I I Date Extracted: 07/22/97 Date Analyzed: 07/29/97 Dilution Factor: 1.0 Blank File: Analyst: DD <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 112 87.7 82.6 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Spike File: SPPCBF0l !Cal: PCBY617 ConCal: YP366 % Moisture: n/a % Lipid: % Solids: 0.79 0.88 1.26 0.79 1.25 n/a n/a 23.77 29.72 25.20 19.73 28.20 Dara Reviewer: ____ :aJ ________ 08/08/97 Triangle Laboratories, lnc.e 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of 1 PCBP .J'Sll Yl.00. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 12:38 08/08/97 I I I Table 4-9 Warren County PCB Landfill Treatability Study Dioxin Data Summary -Condensate I Water Condensate Treated I Analytes (ppq) Blank Composite Condensate 2378-TCDD 5.6 ND(14.6) 7.6 I 12378-PeCDD ND(2.8) ND(32.1) ND(10.4) 1234 78-HxCDD ND(3.5) 19.2 7.6 123678-HxCDD 5 29.1 ND(9.6) I 123789-HxCDD ND(5.1) 45.5 19.2 1234678-HpCDD ND(3.2) 192 78 I OCDD 31.8 552 297 2378-TCDF 8.3 21050 6530 I 12378-PeCDF ND(7.3) 7590 2760 23478-PeCDF ND(2.2) 6180 2580 I 123478-HxCDF ND(7.0) 3400 1290 123678-HxCDF 4.3 1520 579 234678-HxCDF ND(7.5) 954 359 I 123789-HxCDF 8.6 344 108 1234678-HpCDF ND(5.3) 489 201 1234789-HpCDF ND(3.2) 64.1 ND(24.2) I OCDF 9.1 75.4 46.2 I Total TCDD 5.6 345 62.2 Total PeCDD ND(2.8) 295 88.5 Total HxCDD 5 433 157 I Total HpCDD ND(3.2) 429 187 I Total TCDF 8.3 82020 26460 Total PeCDF ND(7.3) 45190 18840 Total HxCDF 12.9 11290 4250 I Total HpCDF ND(5.3) 595 253 Dioxin -TEQ (ppt) 0.08 6.2 2.3 I Removal Efficiency(%) 63 I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: 42504 Client Sample: COAdensate Composite Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) Analysis File: T975443 Client Project: E4038 Sample Matrix: WATER TLI ID: 115-68-lA Sample Size: 1.000 L Dry Weight: n/a GC Column: DB-5 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD EMPC 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 192 1.2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 29.1 1,2,3.7,8,9-HxCDD 45.5 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCI)D 192 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDD 552 2,3,7,8-TCDF 21050 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 7590 2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 6180 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 3400 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 1520 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 954 1,2,3, 7 ,8,9-HxCDF 344 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 489 64.1 Date Received: 07/18/97 Date Extracted: 07/22/97 Date Analyzed: 08/06/97 Dilution Factor: n/a Blank Flle: T975418 Analyst: HLM 14.6 32.1 S pi.lee File: SPX2372S ICal: TF53286 ConCal: T975441 % Moisture: n/a % Lipid: % Solids: 1.08 1.16 1.25 0.93 0.90 0.79 1.51 1.49 1.29 1.32 1.27 129 1.05 0.94 n/a n/a 29:42 29:46 30:02 32:33 35:05 21:17 25:24 26:08 28:57 29:03 29:33 30:16 31:43 32:53 B_ B_ B_ B_ I B_ 1,2,3,4, 7 .8,9-HpCDF 1,2.3,4,6, 7,8,9-0CDF 75.4 0.79 35:13 I I I I I I Total TCDD Total PeCDD Total HxCDD Total HpCDD Total TCDF Total PeCDF Total HxCDF Total HpCDF Triangle Laboratories, Inc.a 345 295 433 429 82020 45190 11290 595 801 Capitola Drive• Durham; North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fa,c,: (919) 544-5491 7 7 6 2 15 14 12 3 Page 1 of 2 403 427 451 45200 675 X237 ..PSR Y2.00. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 19:08 08/06/97 53 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42504 Treated Water Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) Analysis File: T975444 Client Project: Sample Matrix: TI.I ID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: GC Column: 2,3. 7,8-TCDD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4, 7 ,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3.7,8,9-HxCDD 1,2,3.4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1,2.3,4,6, 7,8,9-0CDD 2,3,7.8-TCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 1.2.3.4. 7,8-HxCDF 1,2.3,6, 7,8-HxCDF 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4.7,8,9-HpCDF 1.2.3.4,6. 7,8.9-OCDF Total TCDD Total PeCDD Total HxCDD TotalHpCDD Total TCDF Total PeCDF Total HxCDF Total HpCDF E4038 WATER 115-68-2A 1.000 L n/a DB-5 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~ 7.6 EMPC 7.6 EMPC 19.2 78.0 '191 6530 '1:1&) 2580 1290 579 359 108 201 EMPC 46.2 62.2 88.5 157 187 26470 18840 4250 253 Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: Blank File: Analyst: 3 4 5 2 15 15 11 3 Page 1 of2 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Caroina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 07/18/97 07/22/97 08/06/97 n/a T975418 HLM 10.4 9.6 24.2 159 183 198 4290 277 Spike File: SPX2372S ICal: TF53286 ConCal: T975441 % Moisture: n/a % Lipid: % Solids: 0.72 1.06 1.13 1.06 0.84 0.80 1.49 1.51 130 1.29 1.31 1.24 1.05 0.80 n/a n/a 22:01 29:42 30:03 32:34 35:05 21:14 25:24 26:08 28:57 29:03 29:33 30:15 31:43 35:13 B_ B_ B_ B_ B_ B_ X237 J'Sll "2.00. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 19:09 08/06/97 90 I I I I I I I I I I TLI Project: Client Sample: Client Project: Sample Matrix: TLI ID : Sample Size: Dry Weight: GC Column: 2,3, 7,8-TCDD 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7.8-HpCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-0CDF 42504 TLI Water Blank Method 8290 PCDD/PCDF Analysis (b) Analysis File: T975418 E4038 WATER TU Blank 1.000 L n/a DB-5 5.6 ND ND 5.0 EMPC ND 31.8 8.3 EMPC ND EMPC 4.3 EMPC 8.6 EMPC ND 9.1 Date Received: Date Extracted: Date Analyzed: Dilution Factor: Blank File: Analyst: 2.8 3.5 3.2 2.2 3.2 I I 07/22197 08/04/97 n/a T975418 HLM 5.1 7.3 7.0 7.5 5.3 !Cal: TF53286 Spike File: SPX2372S 1st CCal: T975405 Erid CCal: T975421 % Moisture: n/a % Lipid: n/a % Solids: n/a 0.87 20:52 1.38 28:56 0.79 34:11 0.87 20:03 1.36 28:11 1.33 29:25 0.83 34:17 I ,~~!ft~::::: I I I I I I Total TCDD Total PeCDD Total HxCDD Total HpCDD Total TCDF Total PeCDF Total HxCDF Total HpCDF Triangle Laboratories, lnc.3 5.6 ND 5.0 ND 8.3 EMPC 12.9 EMPC 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 1 2.8 1 10.1 3.2 1 7.3 2 27.3 5.3 Page 1 of2 X237_PSR '2.00. LARS6.I0.03 Printed: 19:06 08/06/97 30 I I Table 4-10 Warren County PCB Landfill Treatability Study VG>C Data Summary -Condensate I Condensate Treated Treated I Analytes (ug/1) Composite (5x) Water (1x) Water (5x) Blank Chloromethane ND(1.24) ND(0.25) ND(1.24) ND(0.25) Vinyl Chloride ND(1 .39) ND(0.28) ND(1.39) ND(0.28) I Bromomethane ND(2.24) ND(0.45) ND(2.24) ND(0.46) Chloroethane ND(2.20) ND(0.44) ND(2.20) ND(0.45) Trichlorofluoromethane ND(1 .13) ND(0.23) ND(1.13) ND(0.23) I 1, 1-Dichloroethene ND(1.77) ND(0.36) ND(1.77) ND(0.36) Carbon disulfide ND(0.43) ND(0.09) ND(0.43) ND(0.09) I Acetone 470.62 241 .59 268.2 4.66 Methylene chloride 3.35 ND(0.27) 3.03 0.88 trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethe ND(1.41) ND(0.28) ND(1.41) ND(0.29) I 1, 1-Dichloroethane ND(0.69) ND(0.14) ND(0.69) ND(0.14) cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethane ND(1.34) ND(0.27) ND(1 .34) ND(0.27) Chloroform ND(0.67) ND(0.14) ND(0.67) ND(0.14) I 1,2-Dichloroethane ND(1.01) ND(0.20) ND(1.01) ND(0.21) Vinyl acetate ND(0.45) ND(0.09) ND(0.45) ND(0.10) 2-Butanone 17.19 9.75 ND(13.79) ND(3.07) I 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ND(0.77) ND(0.16) ND(0.78) NO(0.17) Carbon tetrachloride ND(0.88) ND(0.18) ND(0.90) NO(0.20) I Benzene ND(0.32) ND(0.07) NO(0.33) ND(0.07) Trichloroethene ND(0.97) ND(0.20) ND(0.99) ND(0.22) 1,2-Dichloropropane ND(1.01) ND(0.21) ND(1 .02) ND(0.23) I Bromodichloromethane ND(0.67) ND(0.14) ND(0.68) NO(0.15) cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropen ND(0.65) ND(0.13) ND(0.66) ND(0.15) trans-1 ,3-Dichloroprop ND(0.74) ND(0.15) ND(0.75) ND(0.17) I 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane ND(1 .30) ND(0.26) ND(1 .32) ND(0.29) Dibromochloromethan ND(0.87) ND(0.18) ND(0.89) ND(0.20) Bromoform ND(1.56) ND(0.32) ND(1.59) ND(0.36) I 4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND(0.98) ND(0.20) ND(1.00) ND(0.21) Toluene 7.27 NO(0.11) 7.02 1.81 I T etrachloroethene ND(1.23) ND(0.25) ND(1 .26) ND{0.26) 2-Hexanone ND(1.45) ND(0.30) ND(1.48) ND(0.31) Chlorobenzene ND{0.46) ND{0.09) NO{0.47) NO(0.10) I Ethyl benzene ND{0.86) ND{0.18) NO{0.88) ND(0.19) m-/p-Xylene ND{0.71) ND{0.14) ND(0.72) ND(0.15) a-Xylene ND{0.73) ND(0.15) ND(0.75) ND(0.16) I Styrene ND{0.45) ND(0.09) ND(0.46) ND(0.10) 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroeth ND{0.81) ND(0.17) ND(0.83) ND(0.17) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. Client ID: Filename : TU Id Matrix Units Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bro mo methane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethene Carbon disulfide Acetone Methylene chloride trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichloroethane Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Benzene Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Triangle Laboratories of RTP Project Summary for Project 42506 Condensate Composite (s-.x) FV745 175-70-1 WATER ug/L (124) (1.39) (224) (220) (1.13) (l.77) (0.43) Treated Wa Treated Wa VBLK072997 ter ter (1 x) (S-x') FV743 FV744 175-70-2 175-70-2 FV738 VBLK072997 WATER ug/L WATER WATER ug/L ug/L (0.25) (1.24) (0.25) (0.28) (1.39) (0.28) {0.45) (224) (0.46) {0.44) (220) (0.45) (0.23) (1.13) (0.23) (036) (1.77) (0.36) {0.09) (0.43) (0.09) ttltLmtm~~ ·:::,:rnh::::rt::::::rn%.t-@illl:&ttti~ ,:::,rn:tt:illtt:::rn,=:m•~ ::,;~m&:n:1m::1r1t1•t co27) rarn:rt:::nm:wt.4t= ==:::1::r::@::=::rn::::m:t:atlM=: {1.41) (0.28) (1.41) {0.29) (0.69) (0.14) (0.69) (0.14) (1.34) (0.27) (1.34) (0.27) (0.67) (0.14) (0.67) (0.14) (1.01) (0.20) (1.01) (0.21) (0.45) (0.09) (0.45) (0.10) t@it:IIItft:I~i;i,: :=t::tt:Ii:l:ttt:itiw.;$l: (13.79) (3.07) (0.77) (0.16) (0.78) (0.17) (0.88) (0.18) (0.90) (020) (0.32) (0.07) (0.33) (0.07) (0.97) (0.20) (0.99) (0.22) (1.01) (0.21) (1.02) (0.23) (0.67) (0.14) (0.68) (0.15) (0.65) (0.13) (0.66) (0.15) (0.74) (0.15) (0.75) (0.17) (1.30) (026) (1.32) (029) (0.87) (0.18) (0.89) (0.20) (156) (032) (159) (0.36) (0.98) {0.20) (1.00) (021) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Dibromochloromethane Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Toluene Tetrachloroethene 2-Hexanone Chlorobenzene Ethylbenzene ,:@rnr:::m::r:itttz4.® co.11 > ::f~:nc:=:rtrif.J1t ::::::::,;:::::;,::;::,:::::::;:,:::::::::::::::::;1Jl1,: (123) (0.25) (1.26) (026) (1.45) (030) (1.48) (0.31) (0.46) (0.09) (0.47) (0.10) (0.86) (0.18) (0.88) (0.19) m-/ p-X ylene (0.71) (0.14) (0.72) (0.15) o-Xylene (0.73) (0.15) (0.75) (0.16) ( )-Ettimated Detection Limit Page l Tri.Ingle uboratoriu of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.5 Primed: 14:~ (J!,/05/9'7 I Triangle Laboratories of RTP Project Summary for Project 42506 I Client ID: Condensate Treated Wa Treated Wa VBLK072997 Composite ter ter I Filename: FV745 FV743 FV744 FV738 TU Id : 175-70-1 175-70-2 175-70-2 VBLK072997 Matrix : WATER WATER WATER WATER I Units ug/L ug/L ug/L ug/L Styrene (0.45) (0.09) (0.46) (0.10) I 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (0.81) (0.17) (0.83) (0.17) I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( )-Eatimatad Detection Limit Page 2 Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. Savarv3.S I 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 !J Printed: 14:4fx54 '13/05/97 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 111111111 Bromochloromethane IS 1 4.85 I Chloromethane UU Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane I Chloroethane T richlorofluoromethane 1.1-Dichlorocthene I Carbon disulfide Acetone: I Methylene chloride trans-1 .2-Dichloroethene I I I l , 1-Dichlorocthane cis-1 .2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1.2-Dichloroethane 1.4-Difluorobcnzene Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone l , l, 1-T richloroethane Carbon cecrachloride I Benzene T richlorocthene 1,2-Dichloropropane I Bromodichloromethane cis-1.3-Dichloropropene crans-1.3-Dichloropropcne u u u u u 470.62 B 3.35 BJ u u u u u IS 2 u 17.19 J u u u u u u u u 2.80 3.21 6.06 4.73 1.24 1.39 2.24 2.20 1.13 1.77 0.43 1.41 0.69 1.34 0.67 1.01 0.45 0.77 0.88 0.32 0.97 1.01 0.67 0.65 0.74 NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 I I I I IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; 8: Pre.Nnt In Blank; J: Eatimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Eatimated-Above Cuibntion Range Triangle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.S Printed: 14:22 08/05/19'/7 I I Project Number: 42506 Sample File: FV745 Sample Vol.: 0.005 L Dilution Factor: 5.00 Method 8240 WATER Sample ID: Condensate Composite I 1-11--1.1.2-T richlorocthanc U 1.30 25 Dibromochloromcthanc U 0.87 25 I 1.56 25 Bromoform u Chlorobcnzcnc-d IS 3 10.35 I I I I s 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Toluene T etrachlorocthene 2-Hcxanone Chlorobenzene Ethylbcnzene m-/p-Xylene a-Xylene Styrene l , l ,2,2-T etraehlorocthanc u 7.27 BJ u u u u u u u u 8.09 0.98 1.23 1.45 0.46 0.86 0.71 0.73 0.45 0.81 25 25 25 25 25 25 50 25 25 25 • •c11•~i11m11•■-11- I I I I I I I l.2-Dichlorocthane-d 0.27 5.47 1 108 • Toluene-cl 0.26 7.99 3 104 8 4-Bromofluorobcnzcne 0.25 12.66 3 100 Rcviewedby ___ c; ____ ·;{ _____ _ Date _J_; 5-I t:/ 1 NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Eatimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratoriu of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 13 Savarv3.S Printed: 14:22 08/CIS /1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Number: 42506 Sample File: FV743 Sample Vol.: 0.005 L Chloromc:thane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chlorocchane T richlorofluoromethane l, l-Dichlorocthene Carbon disulfide Acetone Methylene chloride trans-1,2-Dichloroethene l, 1-Dichlorocthane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichlorocthane 1.4-Difluorobcnzcne Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone l, l, 1-T richlorocthane Carbon tetrachloride Benzene T richlorocthc:ne 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane cis-1,3-Dichloropropene trans-1.3-Dichloropropene Dilution Factor: 1.00 u u u u u u u 241.59 BE 2.90 u u u u u u IS 2 6.05 u 9.75 4.76 u u u u u u u u Method 8240 WATER Sample ID: Treated Water 0.25 5 0.28 5 0.45 5 0.44 5 0.23 5 0.36 5 0.09 5 5 0.27 5 0.28 5 0.14 5 0.27 5 0.14 5 0.20 5 0.09 5 5 0.16 5 0.18 5 0.07 5 0.20 5 0.21 5 0.14 5 I 0.13 5 0.15 5 NA• Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit IS: Internal Stan"rd; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Quantitation Umit; E: Eatimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 23 Savarv3.S Printed: 14:39 08/rf,/1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Number: 42506 Sample File: FV743 Method 8240 WATER Sample ID: Treated Water :-=::===-Sample Vol.: 0.005 L Dilution Factor: 1.00 ------·-1,1 .2-T richlorocthane U 0.26 5 Dibromochloromethane U 0.18 5 Bromoform u 0.32 5 Chlorobcnzcne-d 5 IS 3 10.36 4-Methyl-2-pencanone u 0.20 5 Toluene u 0.11 5 T etrachlorocthene u 0.25 5 2-Hcxanone u 0.30 5 Chlorobenzene u 0.09 5 Ethylbcnzene u 0.18 5 m-/p-Xylene u 0.14 10 o-Xylene u 0.15 5 Scyrene u 0.09 5 l , 1,2.2-T etrachlorocthane u 0.17 5 l!!!!?!ii!!!~!~!!!E!!?ii*!!!Iii!!!!3!~ 1.2-Dichlorocthane-d 0.27 5.46 1 108 ~ Toluene-cl 0.26 7.99 3 104 a 4-Bromofluorobcnzcne 0.25 12.67 3 100 Rcviewedby ___ c;_.d _____ _ NA-Not Applicable; Det. Umit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit IS: Intemal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Eatimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: E,tbMted-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratoriea of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham. North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.S Printed: 14:39 08/05/1997 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Number: 42506 Sample File: FV744 Sample Vol.: 0.005 L Dilution Factor: 5.00 Method 8240 WATER Sample ID: Treated Water ----Bromochloromethane IS 1 4.94 Chloromethane U 1.24 25 Vinyl Chloride u 1.39 25 Bromomechane u 2.24 25 Chlorocchane u 2.20 25 T richlorofluoromethane u 1.13 25 I, 1-Dichlorocchene u 1.77 25 Carbon disulfide u 0.43 25 Acetone 268.20 B 3.09 25 Methylene chloride 3.03 BJ 3.40 25 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene u 1.41 25 1.1-Dichlorocthane u 0.69 25 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene u 1.34 25 Chloroform u 0.67 25 1,2-Dichlorocthane u 1.01 25 1.4-Difluorobcnzene IS 2 6.11 Vinyl acetate u 0.45 25 2-Bucanone u 13.79 25 1, 1, 1-T richlorocthane u 0.78 25 Carbon tetrachloride u 0.90 25 Benzene u 0.33 25 T richlorocthene u 0.99 25 1,2-Dichloropropane u 1.02 25 Bromodichloromethane u 0.68 25 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene u 0.66 25 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene u 0.75 25 NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Q~titation Limit IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Q~titation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Savarv3.S Printed: 10:41 08/04/1997 II [0=·· , :0 0 :,::•• .;,:i;:~ :::•: • "; ;~ ;. , " := :==::;,;~~,;~~=l Project Number: 42506 Method 8240 WATER Sample File: FV744 Sample ID: Treated Water : EIII;~- I I I I I Sample Vol.: 0.005 L Dibromochloromethane Bromoform Chlorobenzcne-d 5 4-Mechyl-2-pentanone Toluene T etrachloroechene 2-Hcxanone Chlorobenzene Echylbcnzene m-/p-Xylene o-Xylene Styrene 1.1.2.2-T ecrachloroethane Dilution Factor: 5.00 u 0.89 25 u 1.59 25 IS 3 10.37 u 1.00 25 7.02 BJ 8.12 25 u 1.26 25 u 1.48 25 u 0.47 25 u 0.88 25 u 0.72 50 u 0.75 25 u 0.46 25 u 0.83 25 111111:•!lllrli-llllllltlllltll~-11 1.2-Dichloroethane-d 0.27 5.55 1 108 ~ I Toluene-d 4-Bromofl~orobcnzcne 0.27 8.03 3 108 0.25 12.67 3 100 I I I I I I Reviewedby __ __,C"-'//'-------Date:/_, x_, il NA-Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: QWUttitation Limit IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; 8: Ptt.sent In Blank; J: Estimated-Below QWUttitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Cllibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2m3 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-549! Savarv3.5 Printed: 10:41 08/04/1997 I ~~~~~~-~~~~- I Project Number: 42506 Sample File: FV738 Method 8240 WATER Sample1D:VBLK072997 : ~~~~~~:<:~~*~m.£~:t~:t-~f: Sample Vol.: 0.005 L Dilution Factor: 1.00 I I ·······•0r::*,=• .. ~~::>:.·•·•·· .·:=:·~:·<~•···••·•··•·•·•··•:~·:1:wi ..... :i{:j.· Bromochloromethane IS 1 4.84 Chloromethane U 0.25 I Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane I Chloroethane T richlorofluoromethane 1.1-Dichloroethene I Carbon disulfide Acetone I I Methylene chloride trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1, 1-Dichloroethane cis-1,2-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1.2-Dichloroethane I 1.4-Difluorobenzene Vinyl acetate 2-Butanone I I.I. 1-T richloroethane Carbon tetrachloride Benzene I T richloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane I Bromodichloromethane cis-1.3-Dichloropropene trans-1.3-Dichloropropene I u 0.28 u 0.46 u 0.45 u 0.23 u 0.36 u 0.09 4.66 J 2.82 0.88 J 3.22 u 0.29 u 0.14 u 0.27 u 0.14 u 0.21 IS 2 6.05 u 0.10 u 3.07 u 0.17 u 0.20 u 0.07 u 0.22 u 0.23 u 0.15 u 0.15 u 0.17 NA• Not Applicable; Det. Limit: Detection Limit: Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit 5 5 c; 5 c; c; 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 ; ; 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 I I I IS: Internal Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Eatimated-Below Quantitation Limit: E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive.• Durham. North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 33 Savarv3.S Printed: 10-51 08/0l/1997 1 1 ~1;~1ii}~i!!~::liilii- Project Number: 42506 Method 8240 WATER Sample File: FV738 Sample ID: VBLK072997 I .:!!!!! Sample Vol.: 0.005 L Dilution Factor: 1.00 I I ll1111!1fll-- l.l.2~ T richlorocthanc U 0.29 5 Dibromochloromcthanc tJ 0.20 5 I 0.36 5 Bromoform u Chlorobenzcnc-d IS 3 10.35 I I I 5 4-Mcthyl-2-pcntanonc Toluene T ecrachloroechcne 2-Hexanone Chlorobcnzene Ethylbenzenc m-/p-Xylcnc erXylcne 1.81 u 0.21 5 J 8.09 5 u 0.26 5 u 0.31 5 u 0.10 5 u 0.19 5 u 0.15 10 u 0.16 5 Styrene u 1.1.2.2-Tecrachlorocthanc u 0.10 5 0.17 5 I 11itlFJll1\iialll•a-•1111111-- I I I I I I I l.2-Dichlorocthanc-d 0.24 5.47 1 96 Tolucne-d a 4 4-Bro mo fluorobcnzene Rcvicwedby __ ..,.G,......._.cf~------ 0.25 7.99 3 0.24 12.65 3 Date </ 1.!:!:.J_.:!_7 NA• Not Applicable; Oet. Limit: Detection Limit; Quan. Limit: Quantitation Limit 100 96 IS: Intern.al Standard; U: Undetected; B: Present In Blank; J: Estimated-Below Quantitation Limit; E: Estimated-Above Calibration Range Triangle Laboratories of RTP, Inc. 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 33 Savarv3.S Printed: 10-.51 08/IM/1997 I I Table 4-11 I BCD GROUP Inc./ US EPA Cincinnati I PCB Results for the ETG Dust Samples WC1-4, WC1-4 & WC2-3 Warren County, NC. I Measured concentrations in PPB (ng/g) I Dust Sample Dust Sample Dust Sample WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 PCB Congener Group I Mono-PCBs 220 260 ND(10)* I Di-PCBs 930 1700 340 I Tri-PCB 18750 9380 2260 Tetra-PCBs 10580 44320 5710 I Penta-PCBs 52960 178870 42540 I Hexa-PCBs 159550 692050 151700 I Hepta-PCBs 118060 541880 148950 Octa-PCBs 26820 109990 32640 I Nona-PCBs ND(500) 4090 ND(500) I Deca-PCB ND(1 ppm) ND(1 ppm) ND(1 ppm) I Total (PPM) 387.87 1,582.54 384.14 I *MOO in ppb unless indicated otherwise I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BCD GROUP Inc./ US EPA Cincinnati PCB Results for the ETG Dust Samples WC1 -3, WC1-4 & WC2-3 Run for ETG Environmental, Inc. on the Warren County, NC. samples These samples were received on July 8, 1997 for PCB analyses and possible BCD liquid treatment if the PCB concentrations are of a high enough level to warrant such treatment. These samples are a part of the ETG pilot scale demonstration treatment for a PCB contaminated soils site. The pilot system is charged with a total of 50 lbs. (#) of this soil contaminated with ca. 400 ppm of PCB. Then 50# soil equals 22,700 gms of soil @ 400 ppm equals a maximum total of ca. 9.080 gms of PCB available if only desorption is taking place. Expected recovery of PCB from . the BCD soil desorption is in the range of from 40% to 60%. If one assumes 50% recovery, on the average, then one would expect a total of ca. 4.54 gms. of PCB. The dust samples supplied, WC1-3, WC1-4 and WC2-3 contained significantly less than the expected quantity of PCB. S2.mple WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 Mass of Sample ppm PCB 42.6 gms 387.87 ppm 23.6 gms 1 ;582.54 ppm 48.4 gms 384.14 ppm Total PCB (gms) 0.0165202 0.0373470 0.0185904 Therefore have elected not to treat a mixture of these samples in a liquid BCD treatment system for it would not be representative of the total PCB expected to be recovered from these Pilot scale tests. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BCD GROUP Inc./ US EPA Cincinnati PCB Results for the ETG Dust Samples WC1-3, WC1-4, & WC2-3 Run for ETG Environmental, Inc. on the Warren County, ~C. samples PCB SIM Standard Concentration MOO* Chlorobiphenyl (ppm) (ppm) 1 mono-1.00 .010 2 di-1.00 .020 3 tr i -1.00 .020 4 tetra-2.00 .020 5 penta-2.00 .050 6 hexa-2.00 .030 7 hepta-3 .00 .030 8 octa-3 .00 .100 9 nona-4 .00 .500 1 0 deca-5 .00 1.00 * The MDQ is based on PCB SIM conjeners 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BCD GROUP Inc. / US EPA Cincinnati PCB Results for the ETG Dust Samples WC1 -4, WC1-4 & WC2-3 Run for ETG Environmental, Inc. on the Warren County, NC. samples Measured concentrations in PPB (ng/g) Oust Sample Oust Sample Dust Sample WC1-3 WC1-4 WC2-3 PCB Conjener Group Mono-PCBs 220 260 ND(10)* Di-PCBs 930 1700 340 Tri-PCBs 18750 9380 2260 Tetra-PCBs 10580 44320 5710 Penta-PCBs 52960 178870 42540 Hexa-PCBs 159550 692050 151700 Hepta-PCBs 118060 541880 148950 Octa-PCBs 26820 109990 32640 Nona-PCBs ND(500) 4090 ND(500) Deca-PCB ND(1 ppm) ND(1 ppm) ND(1 ppm) TOTAL (PPM) 387.870 1,582.540 384. 1 40 • = MOO in ppb unless indicated otherwi::;t:: 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table 4-12 PCB Results for the BCD Organic Liquid Study* Treating 10,000 ppm of PCBs (liquid phase) Test Run BCD Reaction (KOH:PCB; 1.75:1) Measured concentrations in PPM (mg/ml) PCB Congener TIME TIME TIME TIME Group 0 5 Minutes 30 Minutes 60 Minutes Mono-PCBs 8.7 505 ND(0.10) ND(0.10) Di-PCBs 109 57.9 ND(0.10) ND(0.10) Tri-PCB 1540 ND(0.20) ND(0.20) ND(0.20) Tetra-PCBs 6446 ND(0.25) ND(0.25) ND(0.25) Penta-PCBs 1859 ND(0.25) ND(0.25) ND(0.25) Hexa-PCBs 41 ND(0.25) ND(0.25) ND(0.25) Hepta-PCBs ND(0.30) ND(0.30) ND(0.30) ND(0.30) Note: ND= non detect at the MDQ contained in the brackets. * Test conducted by BCD Group Inc./US EPA Cincinnati -------------------Contaminant Sample No. Dioxin-TEQ (ug/dscm) Total PCBs I (ug/dscm) Particulates gr/dscf voes (Test 3) ' Toluene Ethyl benzene Xylenes Benezene Table 4-13 Warren County PCB Landfill Treatability Air Monitoring & Modeling J?ata Summary (Results in ug/dscm unless indicated otherwise) Stack Discharge Stack Discharge Model Results Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 WC2-3 WCl-3 WCl-4 2.96 E -5 3.42 E -5 4.26 E -5 4.12 E -9 5.43 E -9 6.01 E -9 1.20 E +0 1.16 E +0 7.44 E -3 1.68 E -4 9.06 E -5 1.05 E -6 0.0004 0.0003 0.0006 WllilY ug/dscm <0.46 <1,800 <0.46 <1,800 <0.46 <1,800 <0.46 <1,800 Air Emmision Performance Goal 5.0 E-8 8.0 E-4 Q- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I August 11, 1997 Mr. Yei-Shong Sheh ETG Environmental 16 Hagerty Boulevard West Chester, PA RE: Pilot Plant Dispersion Model Waterford Project No. ETG97002 Dear Mr. Sheh: WATERFORD COMPLIANCE GROUP The following presents the results of air dispersion modeling based on test data from your pilot plant in West Chester, PA. The USEPA SCREEN3 model was used with the following assumptions: Stack Height -11.7 meters Stack diameter, flow and temperatures will be the same in the field as in the pilot unit Facility boundary line is at 200 feet Results Emission Rate GROUND LEVEL CONCENTRA TION(~tg/m3) Contaminant (µg/m3) 200 ft Allowable (ug/m3) Dioxin (TEQ) Run 1 (WC 2-3) 2.96 X 10-5 4.12 X 10-9 Run 2 (WC 1-3) 3.42 X 10-5 5.43 X 10-9 5 X 10-8 Run 3 (WC 1-4) 4.26 X 10-5 6.0 l X 10-9 PCB Run l 1.20 l.68 X 10-4 Run 2 1.16 9.06 X 10-5 8 X 10-l Run3 7.44 X 10-3 1.05 X 10"6 In each case, the groundlevel concentration at 200 feet is well below the allowable guideline. A more detailed report will follow this letter. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Timothy Harvey of our office, as I will be out of the office for the next two (2) weeks. Sincerely, z;,,.ra 7,t1.~ J.,,, - -~~ewces, PE I -J~ '- President 1296 High Street• Pottstown, Pennsylvania 19464 • (610) 970-2444 • fax (610) 970-9534 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUMMARY OF STACK TEST FIELD DATA SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) 26-Jun-97 Stack cross-sectional area, sq. ft. (A) 0.197 Avg. stack gas temp, deg. R (Ts) 598 Stack static pressure, in. H20 (Pg) 0.04 Stack velocity pressure (sqrt dlt P) 0 .217 Barometric pressure. in. Hg (Pbar) 29.72 Pitot tube coeff. (Cpl 0.99 Dry gas meter coeff. (Y) 1.010 Dry gas meter temp., deg. R (Tm) 567 Metered sample volume, cu. ft. (Vm) 357.51 Water volume collected, ml/gm (Vic) 86.6 Test duration. min. (theta) 597 Sampling nozzle diameter, in. (On) 0.375 Orifice press. drop, in. H20 (dlt HJ 0 .88 Flue gas composition % CO2 3.2 % 02 18.7 % co 0.0 Wateford Compliance Group, Ltd. TEST DATE: 2-Jul-97 30-Jun-97 2-Jul-97 0 .197 0.197 599 598 0.04 0.04 0 .215 0.224 29.72 29.72 0.99 0.99 1.010 1.010 565 563 343.95 352.36 89.3 122.9 583 586 0.375 0.375 0.87 0 .94 3.3 3.3 18.8 18.8 0.0 0 Dioxsum I I SUMMARY OF STACK TEST RESULTS I SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) TEST DATE: 2-Jul-97 I 26-Jun-97 30-Jun-97 2-Jul-97 I Stack abs. pressure, in. Hg (Ps) 29.72 29.72 29.72 Sample vol. standard, dscf (Vmstd) 334.594 323.035 332.166 I Water vapor vol., set (Vwstd) 4.08 4.21 5.79 I Stack gas moisture, pct. (8ws) 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% Stack gas velocity, ft/sec (Vs) 15.26 15.13 15.77 I Stack gas flow Rate, dscfh (Q) 9381 9278 9640 I dscfm 156 155 161 acfm 180 179 186 I FLUE GAS ANALYSIS I Percent CO2 3.2 3.3 3.3 Percent 02 18.7 18.8 18.8 Percent CO 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Percent N2 78.1 77.9 77.9 Bws 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% Md 29.26 29.28 29.28 I Ms 29.12 29.14 29.09 STACK TEST ISOKINETIC RATE CALCULATION I Ts 598 599 598 I Ps 29.72 29.72 29.72 Bws 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% Vmstd 334.59 323.03 332.17 I Vs 15.26 15.13 15.77 An 0.000767 0.000767 0.000767 theta 597 583 586 I I, pct. 92% 92% 91% I I Wateford Compliance Group, Ltd. Dioxsum I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STACK TEST RESULTS -DIOXIN & FURAN SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) LABOR A TORY DAT A Contaminant Mass, ng 2378-TCDD 12378-PeCDD 1 234 78 HxCDD 123678-HxCDD 123789-HxCDD 1234678-HpCDD OCDD 2378-TCDF 12378-PeCDF 234 78-PeCDF 1234 78-HxCDF 123678-HxCDF 234678-HxCDF 123789-HxCDF 1234678-HpCDF 1234 789-HpCDF OCDF TOTAL TCDD TOTAL PeCDD TOTAL HxCDD TOTAL HpCDD TOTAL TCDF TOTAL PeCDF TOTAL HxCDF TOTAL HpCDF 26-Jun-97 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.16 0.54 0.42 0.35 0.19 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.39 0.27 0.07 2.40 2.60 0.50 0.03 Wateford Compliance Group, Ltd. TEST DATE: 2-Jul-97 30-Jun-97 2-Jul-97 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0 .05 0.02 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.16 0.10 0.60 0.59 0.45 0.63 0.42 0.56 0.20 0.25 0.09 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.08 0.06 0.25 0.22 0.15 0.13 0.08 2.30 2.10 2.60 3.50 0.59 0.78 0.05 0.07 Dioxsum I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STACK TEST RESULTS -DIOXIN & FURAN SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) EMISSION CALCULATIONS 26-Jun-97 Contaminant Concentration, ng/dscm 2378-TCDD 3.17E-03 12378-PeCDD 2.11 E-03 1 234 78 HxCDD 5.28E-03 123678-HxCDD 4.22E-03 123789-HxCDD 4.22E-03 1234678-HpCDD 7.39E-03 OCDD 1.69E-02 2378-TCDF 5.70E-02 12378-PeCDF 4.43E-02 234 78-PeCDF 3.69E-02 1 234 78-HxCDF 2.01 E-02 123678-HxCDF 6.33E-03 234678-HxCDF 7.39E-03 123789-HxCDF 3.17E-03 1234678-HpCDF 4.22E-03 1234 789-HpCDF 1.06E-03 OCDF 3.17E-03 TOTAL TCDD 3.17E-03 TOTAL PeCDD 4.12E-02 TOTAL HxCDD 2.85E-02 TOTAL HpCDD 7.39E-03 TOTAL TCDF 2.53E-01 TOTAL PeCDF 2.74E-01 TOTAL HxCDF 5.28E-02 TOTAL HpCDF 3.17E-03 Wateford Compliance Group, Ltd. TEST DATE: 2-Jul-97 30-Jun-97 2-Jul-97 2.19E-03 3.19E-03 2.19E-03 3.19E-03 3.28E-03 5.32E-03 2.19E-03 4.25E-03 3.28E-03 4.25E-03 6.56E-03 8.50E-03 1.75E-02 1.06E-02 6.56E-02 6.27E-02 4.92E-02 6.70E-02 4 .59E-02 5.95E-02 2.19E-02 2.66E-02 9.84E-03 1.06E-02 6.56E-03 1.06E-02 2.19E-03 3.19E-03 5.47E-03 5.32E-03 3.28E-03 4 .25E-03 3.28E-03 4.25E-03 5.47E-03 8.50E-03 6.56E-03 2.66E-02 2.40E-02 1.59E-02 1.42E-02 8.50E-03 2.51 E-01 2.23E-01 2.84E-01 3. 72E-01 6.45E-02 8.29E-02 5.47E-03 7.44E-03 Dioxsum I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STACK TEST RESULTS -DIOXIN & FURAN SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) TEST DATE: 2-Jul-97 26-Jun-97 30-Jun-97 2-Jul-97 Contaminant Emission Rate. lb/hr TEF • 2378-TCDD 1.00E+OO 1.85E-12 1.27E-12 1.92E-12 12378-PeCDD O.OOE+OO 1.24E-12 1.27E-12 1.92E-12 1234 78 HxCDD O.OOE+OO 3.09E-12 1.90E-12 3.20E-12 123678-HxCDD O.OOE+OO 2.47E-12 1.27E-12 2.56E-12 123789-HxCDD O.OOE+OO 2.47E-12 1.90E-12 2.56E-12 1234678-HpCDD O.OOE+OO 4.32E-12 3.SOE-12 5.11E-12 OCDD 1.00E-03 9.88E-12 1.01E-11 6.39E-12 2378-TCDF 1.00E-01 3.33E-11 3.SOE-11 3.77E-11 12378-PeCDF 5.00E-02 2.59E-11 2.85E-11 4.03E-11 23478-PeCDF 5.00E-01 2.16E-11 2.66E-11 3.58E-11 123478-HxCDF O.OOE+OO 1.17E-11 1.27E-11 1.60E-11 123678-HxCDF O.OOE+OO 3. 71 E-12 5.69E-12 6.39E-12 234678-HxCDF O.OOE+OO 4.32E-12 3.BOE-12 6.39E-12 123789-HxCDF O.OOE+OO 1.85E-12 1.27E-12 1.92E-12 1234678-HpCDF O.OOE+OO 2.47E-12 3.16E-12 3.20E-12 1234789-HpCDF O.OOE+OO 6.18E-13 1.90E-12 2.56E-12 OCDF 1.00E-03 1.85E-12 1.90E-12 2.56E-12 TOTAL TCDD 0.00E+OO 1.85E-12 3.16E-12 5.11E-12 TOTAL PeCDD 0.00E+OO 2.41E-11 3.BOE-12 1.60E-11 TOTAL HxCDD O.OOE +00 1.67E-11 1.39E-11 9.59E-12 TOTAL HpCDD 0.00E+OO 4.32E-12 8.22E-12 5.11 E-12 TOTAL TCDF 0.00E+OO 1 .48E-10 1.45E-10 1.34E-10 TOTAL PeCDF O.OOE+OO 1 .61E-10 1.64E-10 2.24E-10 TOTAL HxCDF O.OOE+OO 3.09E-11 3.73E-11 4.99E-11 TOTAL HpCDF O.OOE+OO 1 .85E-1 2 3.16E-12 4.47E-12 Total Toxic Equivalent as 2378-TCDD, lb/hr 1.73E-11 1.98E-11 2.56E-11 • TEF is toxic equivalent factor, as per EPA 1989 dioxin/furan exposure risk assesment update. TEF x emission rate = 2378-TCDD equivalent rate Wateford Compliance Group, Ltd. Dioxsum r TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC. Sample Result Summary for Project 42345A Method 23X Full Screen Analyses (DB-5) Page 1 07/27/97 =================================-========----==============================----====- I Data File Sample ID S974674 TLI Blank S974677 ETG97002JUN26+B S974680 ETG97002JUN30+B S974681 ETG97002JUL2+B Units ng ng ng ng I Extraction Date 07/17/97 07/17/97 07/17/97 07/17/97 Analysis Date 07/23/97 07/23/97 07/24/97 07/24/97 Instrument S S S S Matrix XAD M23TRAIN M23TRAIN M23TRAIN I Extraction Type Soxhlet Soxhlet Soxhlet Soxhlet ============================================-======================================== Analytes 2378-TCDD (0.03) (0.03) (0.02) (0.03) 1 12378-PeCDD (0.03) {0.02} (0.02) (0.03) 12 3 4 7 8 -HxCDD ( 0 . 0 5 ) ( 0 . 0 5 ) ( 0 . 0 3 ) ( 0 . 0 5 ) 123678-HxCDD (0.04) (0.04) (0.02) (0.04) 12 3 7 8 9 -HxCDD ( 0 . 0 4 ) ( 0 . 0 4 ) ( 0 . 0 3 ) ( 0 . 0 4 ) I 1234678-HpCDD (0.05) 0.07 0.06 0.08 OCDD 0.10 0.16 B 0.16 B {0.10} B 2378-TCDF (0.01) 0.54 0.60 0.59 12378-PeCDF (0.02) 0.42 0.45 0.63 123478-PeCDF (0.02) 0.35 0.42 0.56 123478-HxCDF (0.03) 0.19 0.20 0.25 123678-HxCDF (0.03) {0.06} 0.09 0.10 234678-HxCDF (0.03) 0.07 0.06 0.10 1123789-HxCDF (0.04) (0.03) (0.02) (0.03) 1234678-HpCDF {0.05} {0.04} B 0.05 B {0.05} B 1234789-HpCDF (0.05) {0.01} (0.03) (0.04) OCDF 0.06 {0.03} B {0.03} B 0.04 B I TOTAL TCDD ( 0. 03) 0. 03 0. 05 0. 08 TOTAL PeCDD {0.04} {0.39} 0.06 0.25 TOTAL HxCDD (0.04) 0.27 0.22 0.15 TOTAL HpCDD (0.05) 0.07 0.13 0.08 I TOTAL TCDF ( 0 . 01 ) 2 . 4 2 . 3 2 . 1 TOTAL PeCDF (0.02) 2.6 2.6 3.5 TOTAL HxCDF {0.01} 0.50 0.59 0.78 I TOTAL HpCDF {0.05} 0.03 0.05 {0.07} Other Standards 37Cl-TCDD 13Cl2-PeCDF 234 I 13Cl2-HxCDF 478 13Cl2-HxCDD 4 78 13Cl2-HpCDF 789 Percent Recovery 109 105 99.4 96.6 93.6 Swnrnary (% 99.0 94.2 87.5 93.8 86.3 Rec) I Other Standards Percent Recovery Swnrnary (% Rec) 13Cl2-HxCDF 789 89.6 105 13Cl2-HxCDF 234 · 116 132 I Internal Standards 13Cl2-2378-TCDF 13Cl2-23 7 8-TCDD 13Cl2-PeCDF 123 I 13Cl2-PeCDD 123 I I Percent 119 71.4 85.0 91.4 Recovery Suromary 118 72.7 89.6 103 (% Rec) 100 102 97.0 100 107 94.0 127 141 86.0 111 126 98.7 102 88.8 98.8 75.6 101 126 135 75.2 100 115 \ lrriangle Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services Division llllao1 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 27713 Printed: 14:25 07/27/97 'hone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 28 1/ TRIANGLE LABORATORIES, INC. Sample Result Summary for Project 42345A Method 23X Full Screen Analyses (DB-5) Page 2 07/27/97 ==========================================----==-===--=============================== I Data File Sample ID Units I Extraction Date Analysis Date Instrument Matrix S974674 TLI Blank ng 07/17/97 07/23/97 s XAD Soxhlet S974677 ETG97002JUN26+B ng 07/17/97 07/23/97 s M23TRAIN Soxhlet S974680 S974681 ETG97002JUN30+B ETG97002JUL2+B ng ng 07/17/97 07/17/97 07/24/97 07/24/97 s s M23TRAIN M23TRAIN Soxhlet Soxhlet I Extraction Type ===========================================--======================================== I I I I I I I I I I I I I Internal Standards 13Cl2-HxCDF 678 13Cl2-HxCDD 678 13Cl2-HpCDF 678 13Cl2-HpCDD 678 13Cl2-OCDD Percent 77 .1 80.0 78.2 86.7 97.8 Recovery Summary 94.4 92.8 95.2 90.4 123 I Triangle Laboratories, Inc.® Analytical Services Division 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 I Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 (% Rec) 94.1 92.1 91.4 88.2 89.2 93.7 93.4 90.1 114 121 Printed: 14:25 07/27/97 29 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUMMARY OF STACK TEST FIELD DATA SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) 26-Jun-97 Stack cross-sectional area, sq. ft. (Al 0 .197 Avg. stack gas temp, deg. R (Ts) 598 Stack static pressure, in. H20 (Pg) 0.04 Stack velocity pressure (sqrt dlt Pl 0.217 Barometric pressure, in . Hg (Pbar) 29.72 Pitot tube coeff. (Cpl 0.99 Dry gas meter coeff. (Y) 1.010 Dry gas meter temp., deg. R (Tm) 567 Metered sample volume, cu. ft. (Vm) 357.51 Water volume collected, ml/gm (Vic) 86.6 Test duration, min. (theta) 597 Sampling nozzle diameter, in. (Dn) 0 .375 Orifice press. drop, in. H20 (dlt H) 0 .88 Flue gas composition % CO2 3.2 % 02 18.7 % co 0.0 Wateford Compliance Group, Ltd. TEST DATE: 2-Jul-97 30-Jun-97 2-Jul-97 0.197 0.197 599 598 0.04 0 .04 0.215 0.224 29.72 29.72 0 .99 0.99 1.010 1.010 565 563 343.95 352.36 89.3 122.9 583 586 0.375 0 .375 0 .87 0 .94 3 .3 3.3 18.8 18.8 0.0 0 Pcbsum I I SUMMARY OF STACK TEST RESULTS I SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) TEST DATE: 2-Jul-97 I 26-Jun-97 30-Jun-97 2-Jul-97 I Stack abs. pressure, in. Hg (Ps) 29.72 29.72 29.72 Sample vol. standard, dscf (Vmstd) 334.594 323.035 332.1 66 I Water vapor vol., set (Vwstd) 4.08 4.21 5.79 I Stack gas moisture, pct. (Bws) 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% Stack gas velocity, ft/sec (Vs) 15.26 15.13 15.77 I Stack gas flow Rate, dscfh (Q) 9381 9278 9640 I dscfm 156 155 161 actm 180 179 186 I FLUE GAS ANALYSIS I Percent CO2 3.2 3.3 3.3 Percent 02 18.7 18.8 18.8 Percent CO 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Percent N2 78.1 77.9 77.9 Bws 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% Md 29.26 29.28 29.28 I Ms 29.12 29.14 29.09 STACK TEST ISOKINETIC RATE CALCULATION I Ts 598 599 598 Ps 29.72 29.72 29.72 I Bws 1.2% 1.3% 1.7% Vmstd 334.59 323.03 332.17 I Vs 15.26 15.13 15.77 An 0.000767 0.000767 0.000767 theta 597 583 586 I I, pct. 92% 92% 91% I I Wateford Compliance Group, Ltd. Pcbsum I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STACK TEST RESULTS -PCB SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) LABO RA TORY DAT A 26-Jun-97 Contaminant Mass. ug Total PCB 11.40 EMISSION CALCULATIONS Contaminant Concentration. ug/dscm Total PCB 1.20E+00 Contaminant Emission Rate, lb/hr Total PCB 7.04E-07 Wateford Compliance Group, Ltd. TEST DATE: 2-Jul-97 30-Jun-97 2-Jul-97 10.60 0.07 1.16E+00 7.44E-03 6.71E-07 4.47E-09 Pcbsurn I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42345B ETG97002JUN26+B Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP35700 I I I Client Project: E4038 Sample Matrix: MM5 Date Received: 07/08/97 TLI ID: 174-8-lA+B Date Extracted: 07/17/97 Date Analyzed: 07/22/97 Sample Size: 1.000 Dilution Factor: 2.0 Dry Weight: n/a Blank File: YP35300 Analyst: DD Total MonoCB 0.20 2 0.29 I Total DiCB 0.08 4 0.22 Total TriCB 0.07 4 0.12 Total TetraCB 0.12 6 023 Spike File: !Cal: ConCal: % Moisture: % Lipid: % Solids: SPPCBF0l PCBY617 YP346 n/a n/a n/a Ji. ~ I-Total-PemaEBtt---------+0H.8.+2---10f-----lH.~--------------- Total HexaCB 5.7 16 5.8 Total HeptaCB 3.9 14 Total OctaCB 0.56 7 I Total NonaCB EMPC DecaCB ND I TOTALPCB TOTAL PCB+ EMPC 13C12-3,3' ,4,4' -TetraCB I 13C,2-2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5',6,6' -OctaCB I 13C12-2,2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB I 13C12-2.2' ,5,5' -TetraCB 13C12-3,3' ,4,4' ,5,5'-HexaCB 11.4 12.7 1.1 0.73 0.71 0.006 105 72.9 71.2 I I I Dam Reviewec :2u, ✓tiiA Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~ I 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2TT13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of 1 0.58 0.01 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% 0.79 0.88 1.30 0.79 1.27 (J]/28/97 23.77 29.72 2520 19.73 28.20 PCBP .)'SR Yl.00. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 23:08 07/28/97 24 I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42345B ETG97002JUN30+B Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP35800 I Client Project: E4038 Sample Matrix: MMS Date Received: 07/08/97 Splice File: SPPCBF0l I TLI ID: 174-8-2A+B Date Extracted: 07/17/97 !Cal: PCBY617 Date Analyzed: 07/22/97 ConCal: YP346 Sample Size: 1.000 Dilution Factor: 2.0 % Moisture: n/a Dry Weight: n/a Blank Ftle: YP35300 % Lipid: n/a Analyst: DD % Solids: n/a I Total MonoCB 0.06 2 0.46 e, I Total DiCB 0.12 3 0.21 ..{L Total TriCB 0.09 5 0.16 Total TetraCB ~------'0.11 6 0.28 r Total-PentaCB-0:-87 1 1-::1---------------- Total HexaCB 5.1 19 5.1 Total HeptaCB 3.7 13 3.7 Total OctaCB 0.62 7 0.63 I Total NonaCB 0.01 1 DecaCB ND I TOTALPCB TOTAL PCB+ EMPC 13C12-3,3' .4,4' -TetraCB I 13C1r2.2·,3,3·,5,s-,6,6'-OctaCB 13C12-2,2' ,4.4' ,5,5' -HexaCB 10.6 12.2 1.1 0.71 0.62 0.006 105 70.7 61.9 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% 0.78 0.88 1.27 23.77 29.72 25.20 I ~1111t■¾~-•-11r----- I I I Data Revrewer. 2 ✓. LlJ: -Triangle Laboratories, Inc.~ I 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page I of 1 0.76 1.27 07/28/97 19.73 28.20 PCBP .)'SR "200. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 22:56 07/28/97 45 I TLI Project: 42345B Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Client Sample: ETG97002JUL3+B Analysis File: YP35600 I I I I Client Project: Sample Matrix: 11..IID: Sample Size: Dry Weight: Total MonoCB TotalDiCB Total TriCB Total TetraCB E4038 MMS 174-8-4A+B 1.000 n/a -Total-PentaGB I Total HexaCB I I I Total HeptaCB Total OctaCB Total NonaCB DecaCB TOTAL PCB TOTAL PCB+ EMPC 13C12-3,3',4,4'-TetraCB 13C12-2.2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB EMPC ND ND ND ND 0.04 0.02 ND ND ND 0.07 0.12 1.1 0.71 Date Received: 07/08/97 Date Extracted: 07/17/97 Date Analyzed: 07/22/97 Dilution Factor: 2.0 Blank File: YP35300 Analyst: 2 2 DD 0.002 0.002 0.003 0. 0.004 0.005 0.006 106 70.6 0.005 0.08 0.04 20%-130% 20%-130% Spike File: SPPCBFOl !Cal: PCBY617 ConCal: YP346 % Moisture: n/a % Lipid: % Solids: 0.80 0.87 n/a n/a 23.77 29.72 .fJ._ Ji_ I ----i!IRll■IJ!l%l1'J!llll!lllaal-Brilltillll!III 13C12-2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB 0.68 68.1 20%-130% 1.24 25.20 I I I Dara Reviewec ~v UJ: Triangle Laboratories, Inc.@ 801 Capitola Drive • Durham, North Carolina 2n13 I Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 Page 1 of I 0.77 1.25 07/28/97 19.73 28.20 PCIP J'SR Y2.00. LARS 6.10.03 Printed: 23:05 07/28/97 96 •✓ I I TLI Project: Client Sample: 42345B SBLK071797 Modified Method 680 PCB Analysis Analysis File: YP35300 I Client Project: E4038 Sample Matrix: XAD I TLI ID: SBLK 071797 Sample Size: 1.000 I Dry Weight: n/a Total MonoCB I TotalDiCB Total TriCB EMPC 0.02 ND Total TetraCB ND 1---Total Pemacu----------O;0O' Total HexaCB 0.10 Total HeptaCB 0.04 Total OctaCB ND I Total NonaCB ND DecaCB ND I TOTALPCB TOTAL PCB+ EMPC I I I 13Ciz-3,3' ,4,4' -TettaCB 13C12-2,2' ,3,3' ,5,5' ,6,6' -OctaCB 13C1z-2.2' ,4,4' ,5,5' -HexaCB 0.17 0.23 1.0 0.69 0.85 Date Received: I I Date Extracted: 07/17/97 Date Analyzed: 07/2.2/97 Dilution Factor: 2.0 Blank File: YP35300 Analyst: 2 3 4 DD 0.003 0.004 0.007 0.007 O.Ql 102 68.6 85.2 0.02 0.05 0: 0.05 20%-130% 20%-130% 20%-130% Spike File: SPPCBF0l !Cal: PCBY617 ConCal: YP346 % Moisture: n/a % Lipid: % Solids: 0.78 0.85 1.30 n/a n/a 23.77 29.72 25.20 I [11!!;~11!-I "V'Wl(0J:!!b\fr:~ ■-lllllBWi!llllll!illl!!] I 13C1r2.2' ,5,5'-TettaCB 13C1z-3.3',4,4',5S-HexaCB I I I Data Reviewer. ~1/LJ~ Page 1 of 1 Triangle Laboratories, Inc.® I 801 Capitola Drive• Durham, North Carolina 27713 Phone: (919) 544-5729 • Fax: (919) 544-5491 - 0.78 1.26 07/28/97 19.73 28.20 PCIF_PSR "200.1..ARS 6.10.03 Printed: 22:55 07/28/97 116 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUMMARY OF STACK TEST FIELD DATA SOURCE : ETG West Chester Pilot Plant 26-Jun-97 Stack cross-sectional area, sq. ft. (A) 0.197 Avg. stack gas temp, deg. R (Ts) 598 Stack static pressure, in. H20 (Pg) 0.04 Stack velocity pressure (sqrt dlt P) 0.217 Barometric pressure, in . Hg (Pbar) 29.72 Pitot tube coeff. (Cp) 0.99 Dry gas meter coeff. (Y) 1.010 Dry gas meter temp., deg. R (Tm) 575 Metered sample volume, cu. ft. (Vm) 356.47 Water volume collected, ml/gm (Vic) 84.9 Test duration, min. (theta) 597 Sampling nozzle diameter, in. (Dn) 0 .375 Orifice press. drop, in. H20 (dlt H) 0.99 Flue gas composition % CO2 3.2 % 02 18.7 % co 0 .0 Waterford Compliance Group, Ltd. TEST DATE: 7/2/97 30-Jun-97 0.1 97 599 0.04 0.215 29.72 0.99 1.010 569 345.56 88.4 583 0.375 0 .98 3.3 18.8 0.0 2-Jul-97 0.197 598 0.04 0.224 29 .72 0 .99 1.010 569 355.66 88.4 586 0.375 1.05 3.3 18.8 0.0 Partsum I I SUMMARY OF STACK TEST RESULTS I SOURCE: ETG West Chester Pilot Plant TEST DATE: 7/2/97 I 26-Jun-97 30-Jun-97 2-Jul-97 I Stack abs. pressure, in. Hg (Ps) 29.72 29.72 29.72 Sample vol. standard, scf (Vmstd) 329.069 322.353 331.832 I Water vapor vol., scf (Vwstd) 4.00 4.16 4.16 I Stack gas moisture, pct. (Bws) 1.2% 1.3% 1.2% Stack gas velocity, ft/sec (Vs) 15.26 15.13 15.75 I Stack gas flow Rate, dscfh (Q) 9381 9278 9678 I dscfm 156 155 161 acfm 180 179 186 I FLUE GAS ANALYSIS I Percent CO2 3.2 3.3 3.3 Percent 02 18.7 18.8 18.8 Percent CO 0.0 0.0 0.0 I Percent N2 78.1 77.9 77.9 Bws 1.2% 1.3% 1.2% Md 29.26 29.28 29.28 I Ms 29.12 29.14 29.14 STACK TEST ISOKINETIC RATE CALCULATION I Ts 598 599 598 I Ps 29.72 29.72 29.72 Bws 1.2% 1.3% 1.2% Vmstd 329.07 322.35 331.83 I Vs 15.26 15.13 15.75 An 0.000767 0.000767 0.000767 theta 597 583 586 I I, pct. 91% 92% 90% I I Waterford Compliance Group, Ltd. Partsum I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STACK TEST RESULTS -PARTICULATES SOURCE : ETG West Chester Pilot Plant 26-Jun-97 LABORATORY DAT A Particulate matter collected Filter + rinse residue, gm 0.0075 EMISSION CALCULATIONS Particulate cone., actual, gr/dscf (cs) Front half only (filterable) 0 .0004 Particulate emission rate, actual, lbs/hr (El 0.0005 Waterford Compliance Group, Ltd. TEST DATE: 7/2/97 30-Jun-97 2-Jul-97 0.0058 0 .0099 0.0003 0 .0005 0.0004 0.0006 Partsum I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Particulate Lab Analysis Project # : ETG97002 Filter No. Run No. Date Tare Final 16 1 26-Jun-97 0.1240 0.1251 33 2 30-Jun-97 0.1242 0.1294 34 3 2-Jul-97 0.1251 0.1261 29 Blank 2-Jul-97 0.1238 0.124 Acetone Rinse Run No. Date Tare Final 1 26-Jun-97 3.8830 3.8899 2 30-Jun-97 4.0544 4.0555 3 2-Jul-97 4.0031 4.0125 Blank 2-Jul-97 4.0287 4.0290 Analyst: Ronald W. Brig,9s, Jr. . . J /I! 1 - S1gnature.{zz-ek' !,&,y g' '/; Waterford Compliance Group, Ltd. Blank Net Corrected 0.0011 0.0009 0.0052 0.0050 0.0010 0.0008 0.0002 N/A Blank Net Corrected 0.0069 0.0066 0.0011 0.0008 0.0094 0.0091 0.0003 N/A Pmlab I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUMMARY OF STACK TEST FIELD DATA SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) Stack cross-sectional area, sq. ft. (A) Avg. stack gas temp, deg.A (Ts) Stack static pressure, in. H20 (Pg) Stack velocity pressure (sqrt dlt P) Barometric pressure, in. Hg (Pbar) Pitot tube coeff. (Cp) Orifice temp.,deg. F Orifice inlet vac., in. Hg (Pc) Orifice outlet vac., in. Hg (P crit) Calibration flow rate, liters/min., actual (Qsb) Test duration, minutes (theta), minutes Ambient temp, deg F Stack gas moisture content Flue gas composition % CO2 % 02 % co TEST DATE: oxidizeroutlet 0.1970 598 0.04 0 .224 29.72 0 .99 90 -0.02 -20.00 0.050 240 90 0.0120 3.3 18.8 0.0 WATERFORD COMPLIANCE GROUP, Ltd. 2-Jul-97 Vocsum I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) Stack abs. pressure, in. Hg (Ps) Sample vol. , standard liters,(Vm std) Stack gas velocity, ft/sec (Vs) Stack gas flow Rate, dscfh (Q) dscfm acfm FLUE GAS ANALYSIS Percent CO2 Percent 02 Percent CO Percent N2 Bws Md Ms TEST DATE: oxidizer outlet 29.72 11.308 15.75 9681 161 186 3.3 18.8 0.0 77.9 1.2% 29.28 29.14 WATERFORD COMPLIANCE GROUP, Ltd. 2-Jul-97 Vocsum I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STACK TEST RESULTS -ORGANIC SOLVENTS SOURCE: ETG Pilot Plant (West Chester) LABORATORY DATA Contaminant mass collected, mg toluene ethylbenzene xylenes benzene Contaminant concentration, ppmv toluene ethyl benzene xylenes benzene molec. wt. 92.1 106.2 106.2 78.1 Contaminant concentration, ug/cubic meter(*) toluene ethyl benzene xylenes benzene (*) dry standard conditions Contaminant emission rate, lb/hr toluene ethyl benzene xylenes benzene TEST DATE: Oxidizer Outlet 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 884 884 884 884 5.34E-04 5.34E-04 5.34E-04 5.34E-04 2-Jul-97 NOTE -detection limits for 111/ compounds was 0. 02 mg. Rather than report-zero emiBBions, 50% of the detection limit was used to calculate stack emissions. WATERFORD COMPLIANCE GROUP, Ltd. Vocsum I I PHILIP ANALYTICAL SERVICES I WATERFORD COMPLIANCE GROUP 1296 HIGH STREET POTTSTOWN, PA 19464 I Attention: RON BRIGGS Client Number !97-0708-044 ETG-97002-2-J-l I 1. BENZENE Section 2 2. TOLUENE I I Section ·2 3. ETHYL BENZENE Section 2 4. XYLENE Section 2 LABORATORY REPORT INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING • EPA/NVLAP 101262-0 • NY DOH 10903 • NJ DEP 77678 · • AIHA ACCREDITATION NO. 8707 • PA DER 06-353 Results BTEX PROFILE < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg Work Order Number: R070897-010 Sample Received: 07/08/97 Report Date: 07/14/97 Concentration N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A IAnalytical Method: NIOSH 1501,1500 Detection Limit: 0.02 mg I I I I I I I I I I Reviewed by: Fre Usbeck, CIH Laboratory Director 4418 POTTSVILLE PIKE. READING. PENNSYLVANIA 19605 610-921 -8833 FAX 610-921-9667 ANALYTICAL SERVICES ~ ')WATERFORD COMPLIANCE 1296 HIGH STREET POTTSTOWN, PA 19464 GROUP I Attention: RON BRIGGS Client Number 1!97-0708-045 ETG-97002-2-J-2 1. BENZENE Section 2 2. TOLUENE I Section 2 3. ETHYL BENZENE Section 2 4. XYLENE Section 2 -LABORATORY REPORT INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING • EPA/NVLAP 101262-0 • NY DOH 10903 . • AIHA ACCREDITATION NO. 8707 • PA DER 06-353 • NJ DEP 77678 . Results BTEX PROFILE < O. 02 mg < O. 02 mg < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg < 0.02 mg < o. 02 mg Work Order Number: R070897-010 Sample Received: 07/08/97 Report Date: 07/14/97 Concentration N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A alytical Method: NIOSH 1501,1500 Detection Limit: 0.02 mg ~ I I I I I I Reviewed by: Fr Usbeck, CIH Laboratory Director 4418 POTTSVILLE PIKE, READING, PENNSYLVANIA 19605 610-921-8833 FAX 610-921-9667