NCD980602163_19970313_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_Joint Warren County State PCB Landfill Working Group, March 1997-OCR

DATE:
JOINT WARREN COUNTY/STATE PCB LANDFILL
WORKING GROUP AGENDA
March 13, 1997
I. Welcome
II. Approval of Minutes -December 17, 1996
January 3, 1997
January 21, 1997
February 6, 1997
III. *Unfinished Business
Report from Committees
a) Executive Committee ....................................... Dollie Burwell
Henry Lancaster
b) Technical Committee
c) Science Advisors
Patrick Barnes
Joel Hirschhorn ....... Preferred EPA Compliance Strategy for the
State
d) Division of Waste Management ....................... Mike Kelly
IV. New Business
V. Other Business
VI. Adjournment -6:30 p.m.
* Each person will be allotted no more than 15 minutes
F'CB l_1JIJRKINt3l (,R[IUF' Fax:[phone] Mar 13 '97 14 :37
'1 \
I \
\JOINT WARREN COUNTY/STATE PCB LANDFILL
WORKING GROUP AGENDA
DATE: March 13, 1997
I. Welcome
II. Approval ofMinutes -December 17, 1996
January 3, 1997
January 21, 1997
Febn1ary 6, 1997
ill. *Unfinished Business
Report from Committees
P.01
--• 1/)
a) Executive Committee ....................................... Dollie Burwell
Henry Lancaster
IV.
V.
b) Technical Committee
c) Science Advisors
Patrick Barnes
Joel Hirschhorn ....... Preferred EPA Compliance Strategy for the
State
d)
Other Business
VI. Adjournment -6:30 p.m.
• Each person wiU be allotted no more than 15 minutes
0
0
0
I r ·
lf)
I\
.I • -
MEMORANDUM:
TO: PCB WORKING GROUP
FROM: MIKE KELLY
SUBJECT: PROJECT UPDATE
1. MONITORING WELLS:
The well contractor completed
Thursday, March 6. This includes 14
and 3 (four were dug, but only
"background" wells.
March 13, 1997
the last of 17 new wells on
new wells around the landfill
3 will be used) off site
The wells were "developed" by the end of the day on Friday,
March 7. As mentioned in the last update, Patrick and I agreed on
two additional wells, which are included in this total. These
wells are on the northwest and southeast corners of the landfill.
The well contractor de-mobilized from the site last Friday.
2. LANDFILL BORINGS
S&ME completed their work last week as well, and came back on
Friday, March 7 to compact the soils excavated during the liner
evaluation. They, likewise, have de-mobilized and left the site.
The sections of liner that were cut out have been sent to
Charlotte for testing and evaluation.
All soils and debris generated as waste during this phase, as
well as the drums containing the 5 gallon buckets to be used in the
pilot study, were picked up last Monday (March 3) by ECOFLO, a
hazardous waste disposal company from Greensboro. No materials
known to be contaminated with PCB's remain at the site.
3. DISPOSAL OF PCB WASTE AND DEBRIS
ECOFLO is storing all materials picked up until they hear from
me. There are four 85 gallon overpack drums, each containing 4
five gallon buckets to be shipped to vendors bidding on the
detoxification study. They also have the following materials
needing to be disposed of:
8 drums of PCB contaminated soil
4 drums of PCB contaminated protective equipment, trash, etc.
3 drums of PCB contaminated water used in de-contamination of
equipment.
j • -
PCB Working Group update
March 13, 1997
There are two options available to us for disposal of this
material:
1) Treatment and landfilling at Chemical Waste Management's
facility in Emelle, Alabama.
2) Incineration at a Rollin's incinerator in Deerpark, Texas.
This option is about $5,800 more expensive.
ECOFLO will hold the material to be disposed of until next
week when they would like to hear from us as to which disposal
option is selected. The Working Group needs to discuss the options
and let me know your decision.
4. DETOXIFICATION STUDY:
The bids for the detoxification bench scale testing are due in
next Wednesday. I will immediately Fed-ex copies to the science
advisors and the working group. Hopefully we can get together and
discuss soon and make a recommendation to the Secretary.
5. SAMPLING PLANS/ ACTIONS
Equipment and supplies were delivered to the landfill on
Monday. We began sampling on Tuesday, March 11. EPA has a
representative here who is splitting samples with us on all of the
major sampling media.
Last week,
laboratories.
operations.
we shipped the initial load of samples to the
These were samples taken during the drilling
It is anticipated that we will complete the sampling on Friday
afternoon.
In addition to those samples identified in the Sampling Plan,
we have added numerous sediment samples to be tested for PCB's and
will be testing a variety of samples for pesticides and herbicides.
M~R 13 '97 03:48PM EHNR •PUBLIC AFFAIRS
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Joint Warren County/State PCB Working Group
Henry M. Lancaster II
Dollie Burwell
13 March 1 997
Executive Committee Report
Leiislati ve Update
P.1
A meeting is being arranged with Senator Frank Ballance to update him on activity taking place
at the landfill. The General Assembly is in session and more specifically is in the process of
reviewing Department Continuation budget. The Natural & Economic Resources Subcommittee
has reviewed the Division of Waste Management budget and inquired about expenditure of funds
appropriated for the detoxification effort. Senator Ballance needs to be apprised of the current
activity as he prepares to enter budget negotiations.
Congressional Inqutry
Representative Eva Clayton has ,vrittcn Secretary Jonathan Howes and requested an update on
activity at the landfill. She has also ex.pressed an interest in the department's strategy for
achieving detoxification. The Secretary intends to share his working group re-appointment plan
with Representative Clayton and invite her to play a role in securing federal assistance for the
project.
Working Groyp Staffing Concerns
The Executive Committee has received a letter from staff concerning interactions with the
science advisors. There are some issues relating to work assigrunents and meeting scheduling
that need to be addressed. We will look into the matters and report back our findings and actions
at the next meeting.
BF A Environmental Consultants =t:.:..-= -=.:z: :nttu ~ z C ;#"
Barnes, Ferland and Associates, Inc.
MEMORANDUM
TO : Working Group/Technical Committee
FROM : Pat Barnes, Science Advisor~
DATE: March 5, 1997
SUBJECT: Disposal of Excess Soil and Waste Material Associated wi.th
the Landfill Test Borings Activities
BFA #95 -017
During conversations yesterday with Dollie Burwell, I infonned her that based on discussions I
have had with Mike Kelly, there was a possibility that the waste material removed from the landfill
could end up in Emelle, Alabama. I reminded Mike, that it would be contrary to the general
understanding, as I understood it, between the State an the Working Group. Dollie agreed and
expressed strong opposition to this material, which consists of 8 soil drums, 3 rinse water drums
and 4 drums containing soiled, disposable protective equipment, being disposed of anywhere but
on-site. ·
It is my understanding that the EPA was made aware of this potential and at one time had
indicated the willingness to grant the appropriate authorization/pennit for the material to remain
on-site.
Because the transfer of PCB containing material off-site for disposal is contrary to the founding
principles of the Working Group. I recommend that this matter be on the agenda of Thursday's
meeting.
P A.8/p1g/J -7ff'v J .doc
3655 Maguire Boulevard • Suite 150 • Orlando, Florida 32803
Office [phone] • Fax [phone]
.Samples from above the water table
Samples:
Tests: Tests
Boring
8-1
Permeability (Flex Wall)
Atterberg Limits
Grain Size Analyses
Unit Weight
Specific Gravity
Organic Content
Depth o· -2'
2 -4•
41-6'
6'-81
15'-17'
1 at 4350/ea
7 at $75/ ea
7 at $140 /ea
7 at $20/ea
7 at $65/ea
7 at $55/ea
Natural Moisture Content 7 at $7.50/ea
Subtotal
Samples below the Water Table
Samples:
Tests: Tests
Boring
8-1
Permeability (Fix Wall)
Atterberg Limits
Grain Size Analyses
Unit Weight
Specific Gravity
Organic Content
Natural Moisture Content
Depth Boring
20.5 -22.5' 8-2
22.5'-24.5'
4 at $218.50/ea
4 at $75/ ea
4 at $140 /ea
4 at $20/ea
4 at $65/ea
· 4 at $55/ea
4 at $7.50/ea
Subtotal
Depth
4'-6'
2 -4"
6'-8'
15'-17'
$ 350.00
$ 525.00
$ 980.00
$ 140.00
$ 455.00
$ 385.00
$ 52.50
$2,887.50
Depth
20.5'-22.5'
22.5'-24 .5'
,,e,.,
I' 1,-,. µ-(_ v-L,
$ 374.00
$ 525.QQ ?CD
$ 980.00 5<c~
$ 140.00 go
$ 455.00 z: (_(/
$ 385.0Q -z_ ,z..,O
$52.50 ~
$2,324.00
In addition, natural moisture content tests were recommended for the other 14
split spoon samples that were collected of the landfill materials. Because the
bottom spilt spoon samples contained two to three different materials (landfill,
· drainage medium, and clay) the total number of tests recommended is 18. So
that NMC tests can be performed on these materials.
Cost of NMC tests 18 at$ 7.50/ea $ 135.00
Shipping costs were estimated at:
Coordination packaging and data submittal were estimated at:
The estimated cost of testing is:
Testing budget already authorized:
Additional funds required:
$ 998.50
$1,200.00
$ 7,545.00 1, $6J9TL§f,?7(f >.
$ 747.75 -r;s,--r--f
Please note that the samples Included with the liner evaluation are not included
In this detail, as they were Included originally in our proposal. The liner
evaluation will include 2 permeability tests and four sets of classification tests.
Please advise if you want to modify the testing program from that shown here.
Sincerely, S&ME
Walter J. Beckwith, P.G.
I I
i State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
General Services Division
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Laird Davison, Director
AVA
DEHNR
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NUMBER V _ fl Q 1.5.
BETWEEN
WARREN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
AND THE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Pursuant to paragraph D. of Agreement Number V _ fl Q 1 .5_, the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources would like to amend said agreement to
increase the amount payable by TWENTY-THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY
ONE DOLLARS ($23,161.00) making the total amount payable under the agreement
FORTY-EIGHT THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-ONE DOLLARS ($48,161.00).
In addition, the Department desires to change the agreement ending date to December
31, 1997.
It is the intent of this amendment to address provisions noted only, and in no way should
th is amendment be construed to further modify this contract. Please indicate acceptance
by your signature below.
Approved :
Laird A Davison, DEHNR
£} ~ . r?_-fJJ f 7
Warren Co. Board of Commj sioners Date
Return one (1) duplicate original to : Doris Strickland, Chief, Purchase & Contract Section,
DEHNR, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611 -7687.
cc: ~iam Meyer, Division of Waste Management
Office of the Controller
DUPLICATE ORIGINAL
P.O. Box 27687 , Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Voice 919-733-9746 N!,C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative.Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
~(v--~~/(
-(Ir 1(--1 ''f-f\ \ \Ser ~ cvl u
......
;i/J iV.•c,~y
(c.i"'""~ .
o/ ~ N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and NaNBI Resources
i!f.4i? 1 , ~9~! Page_ of_:_
Division of General Services
CONTRACT BUDGET
01, 97 ---Waste Management Division Contract No.~ ~ ~ _1_ 2_ _
Effective Date Division/Section/Program
Contract System No. _______ _
12 / 9 7 For FlS. cal Year 96 / 9 7 n..-h Ord N n,1.n. ase er o. ____ _ ---Termination Date 97/98
Revision No. D D
Contractor: __ w_a_r_r_en_C_o_u_n_t_y ____________ Purpose: __ P_C_B_L_a_n_d_f_1._· 1_1 ________ _
Project Director: Lo ria D. Williams Total Budget: S __ 2_3.;.., _16_1 _________ _
ITEM DESCRIPTIO~
Contract with Warren County t o prov i de hal f -time
secr e t ar y , office s pace , f urni t ure,
and supplies for one year.
Budget Cod e 24300
2103 536961 -
FUND OBJ RCC
Contractor Authorized Official
DEK'IR 2412 (llrvisrd 1/9◄)
Citncral Srrviccs Oi,·ision (llc,·ic...-1/96)
. -
-
PROG
equipmen t,
ITEM
NO.
6100
DEH!"iiR
CONTRACTOR CONTRACT
AMOU~T AMOU~T
I I
I I
I I
I 23 ,161 po ~-
I I
I -I !
I ;
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I . I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I I . I
I I
' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
MEMORANDUM:
TO: Potential Respondents
January 31, 1997
FROM: Michael A. Kelly, Deputy Director
Division of Waste Management
.AVA
DEHNR
SUBJECT: Request for proposals to evaluate r ec nologies on soils
extracted from the PCB Landfill, Warren County, North Carolina.
The Division of Waste Management seeks proposals for a two phase bid on conducting
evaluations of technologies to be used in the detoxification of the PCB Landfill in Warren
County, North Carolina. The proposals are to be for the evaluation of the following technologies
only:
1) Base Catalyzed Dechlorination (BCD)
2) Gas Phase Chemical Reduction
These technologies have been determined by the Warren County Working Group and
Science Advisors to be the most appropriate technologies for detoxification. No other remedial
or detoxification technologies will be considered responsive to this RFP.
A mandatory pre-bid meeting will be held February 17, 1997, at 10:00 AM in
Conference Rooms 1 & 2, Division of Waste Management, 401 Oberlin Road, Raleigh, North
Carolina. Five copies of the final proposals are due to the Division of Waste Management, 401
Oberlin Road, Suite 150, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605, no later than 12:00 noon on
Wednesday, March 19. 1997.
Multiple companies may be chosen for Phase I, however, only one company and
technology will be awarded a contract for Phase II . All responsive bidders will quote on both
phases of this project in their final proposal.
Contact: Mr. Michael A. Kelly, Deputy Director, Division of Waste Management, State
of North Carolina, 919-733-4996, ext. 201.
P.O . Box 27687,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Voice 919-733-4996
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ l O"/o post-consumer paper
~C -b L ~\z__ '-~'--'--\ VISITOR SIGN-IN SHEET PLEASE FILL OUT COMPLETELY ?v<-(h,~~ ~~ ~~ ~c__~ ~---c--~f'-DATE BADGE VISITOR'S # NAME PHONE NUMBER STAFF YOU ARE VISITING TODAY -'-..l....f-~--~---+--l-~~-_c~~.----l--L.:1.L:1u_~:b...d...!::ll--4,,~~~~~.!....r---'---~~~E =::j· TIME IN :J/17 ? Ro -F. W--t<}crr'I, ~c.l /Oblbs .2/11 /hrA 61?ArJI 511-,72'/-1=fl C Oh~ ~ M<r_/k/J fl-f}#rl/~ ( !3Y7l5-~J.7.{i) f'uJ ~i'e-c¼,1i4nX! 1};,c_. ' £c,o L-0§/C.-I 4 I I I f.vll..L k'>V•S.!° 2 -17 /uNru-1-\A.CS ~1,)gstf-07'r1 Olo6J GJv. -.t. &fJU..1 s✓~f,...JN'-. '-1·.:: Q.-17 ( ~tevt. /Jtf~,._,;'/~.,--~ra-lf3i-C/tt)ol t7L £(1v;1·0,)1>1t,4/ J:,,c... ~ -I 7 2. Ye-r-S"°t-f-t'~ (.. Q, t?<· 610-WI -(t'n vr:::·L ·z_.l} 0 l,,,gJ ~17 I~ {,((~---ML -/0 £~6 /tJV Jb '1 I) D<J"Yl f Jr ·'Is --6i1tJ IA 1 7 7~.A-~~ YS 9-99'i7 /J f-,L,;.,.J-.L-<--4-~ ;J~<!_ !V/;<J-~ 1 & l.4 e_ Hu__V\\f\\(.,~ 31\ 1,D07 J:=.11,.'J>n.1.alnkll.lr;;,l/2~!-~~ j,HJJl_ TIIVIE our .... ., Q/11 21r7 orx1s12~2'"1(} w ~~!~ MANAGEMC!~r!,,vistq>as.frm ,.J:{j._;f---/1ZIS'C!L LA-f1. TyllE~ /~-3 · /.SC) < /Xn ,,, /() I C / tuc1 ·)r lix,-//1-I.
.....
:·· t
~~~~:..!.!"'~·-~•-\ '!"'i;-~:.:·. •.:--:-:.::-.::._;:,·: ;~·-':'"":-:£:.~J;;.~ ... -=.f~-:..r;;..:~.~~.ie.:'.d.*-Ztj~7¾:.-:-.!;--\..::.:":j,e~-'::.-·-~--.~,.:;-~ .. :-.: !'.·;~.r;r:--::..:: ~•-5,.~•:,o_ '.; .. ~ .!,-<:~~;f,i.,];::t:-~ ~-J.ta'"i~=--~ ~: _.._:_.-.:,.:>·:,:,:~.!~~;;:;· ;,?·
IMPORTANT REASONS FOR CHANGING
CURRENT STRATEGY
• Field Testing of Small Amounts of Site Waste will not
Provide Information that is more Useful than Bench-Scale
Testing
• Costs of Two Field Tests \\'ould be Extremely High
• It is Necessary to Examine Other Detoxification
Technologies
• Current Approach Would not Provide Sufficient Detailed
Information
• A Much Stronger Case for Funding can be Made by
Spending Money on More Thorough Site Investigation
and Remedy Design
KEYSTEPSOFREC01\1MENDED
ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY
• Detailed Evaluation of Detoxification Technologies and
Vendors
• Initiate Site Investigation
• Design Soil/Waste Removal Plan/Select Vendor
• Issue Feasibility Study Report
• Invite Vendors to Conduct Bench-Scale Treatability Tests
• Science Advisors Evaluate Test Results and Select/Rank
Vendors
,
.l .
f•-•:'••--~":'•: ::;":~~• •:•:•:• . .=~•:._;-::~•!::~•,r-"~~4~7~;~i:-:t,.t:;.f;.;,.:~•::.:.: •.!-"'",.°}'.,j\~;~~•,,~• i! •~:.•.• ~::. ... ~-... •;;,/;.,. :_.: !."• •~ :!•••' •:.~ .•~--;,'.,:•~ii . .::•.~ .. :,: • .;.: ,• t~ • • r": •~--•i•~••.:"".=~~:i,,i/i,..vi.~.:.:.;1-_.,•::~.:••~~.:,f> --•~:~~• /•• ~{•,:.\;." ,/
KEY STEPS OF RECOMMENDED
ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY
(Continued)
• Finalize Site Investigation Report
• Working Group Meeting with Highest Ranked Vendors
• Best Technology Vendor Selected/Pre-Qualified for Actual
Cleanup
• Selected Vendor is Hired as Design Contractor (Under
Current Funding)
• Remedy Selection and Remedial Design Report
• Report used as the Basis for Working Group/DEHNR
formally Proposing the Landfill Detoxification Project to
the State Legislature to Obtain Funding
SITE INVESTIGATION GOALS
• Establish Condition of Liner
• Bedrock Condition and Topography
• Transmissivity of Weathered Rock Zone
• Direction of Groundwater Flow
• Identification of Contaminant Plume
• Types and Amounts of Contaminated Media Reguiring
Clean-Up
,
,
..
~--:<v~-t'i•":-'.•::':..: ± .. ::❖"·:.!t{;;t";~~ ..:"~•~--•:;;:~~=t~t~~~~:':.i'!:.=t;;~:!:~1!:: ~ ,."t:·=-~:..-1-:~f.:~~: "'-~·,ai, ~A:.~:-~:·.~-.:::.~~::; : .. "';,j(-;:~;-.-~•r .!-~-:::.~· .-, ~:--:-:·-'··~•·.:r·~~:;•:.,;:::,i..·~:·;;,.~ --::.:·:-~:\,-:::r :1:,:,.z:_ -~':.::;:.:.~::1s· ,.;·
SITE INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIES
• Collection of Samples to Conform with Permit
Requirements
• Analyze Existing Data
• Develop and Implement Field Sampling and Testing Plan
• Non-Intrusive Testing (Geophysics)
• Soil Borings
• Installation of Additional Monitoring Wells
• Collection of Additional Surface Water and Sediment
Samples
,
MASTER PLAN
PURPOSE
• Guidance Document
• Road Map
• Operational Document
• Stand Alone
PLAN CONTENTS
• Introduction and Background
• Project Goals and Objectives
• Approach for Evaluating Technologies and Selecting
Remedy
• Approach for Performing Site Investigation
• Legislative Funding
• Project Schedule
PCB LANDFILL ThIPACT ASSESSMENT
AND DETOXIFICATION
MASTER PLAN
PRELIMINARY TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
1.1 Site History
1.2 The Working Group
1.3 The Role of the State
1.4 The Role of the Science Advisors
2.0 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
2.1 Mission Statement
2.1. l Impact Assessment
2.1.2 Detoxification
2.1.3 Community Involvement
2.1.4 Responsibility of the Working Group
3 0 DEVELOPMENT OF FEASIBILITY AND REMEDY SELECTION REPORT
3 .1 Detoxification Technology and Vendor Evaluation
3 .1. I Review of Past and Current Approach
3.1.2 Comparative Analysis
31 .3 Recommendations
3 .1 . 4 Work Plan for Treatability Testing
3.2 Landfill Soil/Waste Removal Plan
3 .2.1 Review of Current Approach
3.2 .2 Soil/Waste Removal and Vendor Selection Procedure
3.2.3 Testing Requirements
3 J Treatability Testing
3.3. l Bench Scale Testing Results
3.3 .2 Analysis of Data
3 .3 .3 Recommendations
3 .4 Remedy Selection
3. 4 .1 Effectiveness/Pelf ormance
3 .4.2 Safety/Environmental Impacts
3.4.3 Cost
3.4.4 Comparative Analysis and Recommendations
3. 4. 5 Role and Responsibility of the Working Group
3. 5 Procedure for Establishment of Remedial Goals
3.5.1 Evaluation of Test Results
3. 5 .2 Ranking Procedure
3. 5. 3 Pelformance Standards
3.5.4 Responsibility of Working Group
3.6 Procedure for Selecting and Awarding Detoxification Design Contract
95-017.00 -1-
MPTOC.DOC
3.6 1 Role of Science Advisors
3.6 2 Role of the Working Group
3.6.3 Role of the State
4.0 DEVELOPMENT OF SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT
4.1 Site Investigation
4.1.1 Review of Past Sampling and Analysis
4.1.2 Field Sampling and Testing Plan
4.2 Landfill Integrity
4.2.1 Leachate Collection System
4.2.2 Liner Condition
4.2.3 Water in Landfill
4.3 Scope of Off-Site Impact
4.3 .1 Soil
4.3 .2 Groundwater
4.3.3 Surface Water
4.3.4 Sediment
4.3.5 Air
4. 4 Contaminant/Waste Releases
4.4.1 Fate and Transport
4. 5 Estimates of Volumes Requiring Remediation
5.0 REMEDIAL DESIGN
5.1 Roles of Technology Vendor, Science Advisors/STATE
5.2 Site Layout and Logistics
5.3 Construction Phasing
5. 4 Health and Safety Concerns
5. 5 Impact Monitoring
5.6 Detoxification Field Pilot Test
5.7 Preliminary Design and Operation Plan
5. 8 Clean-up Cost Estimates
6.0 LEGISLATIVE FUNDING
6.1 Briefing Document
6.2 Presentation Procedure and Materials
6.2 .1 Role of Working Group
6.2 .2 Role of Science Advisors
6.2.3 Role of the State
7.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
95-017.00
MPTOC.DOC
-2-
•
ACTIVITIESfTAROET DATE 1. Master Plan Development 2. Detox. Tech & Vendor Evaluation 3. Site Investigation 4. Soll/Waste Removal 5. Treatabllity Testing 6. Feasibility Study 7. Remedial Goals 8. Vendor Screening & Awarding Of Detoxification Contract 9. Site Investigation Report 10. Remedial Design/Remedy Salee. Rpt. 11. Legislative Fundin 0 Report Submitted to Working Group/State PCB landfill Master Plan Implementation Schedule MONTHLY Jul Au ~ ~~~ ~ Se Oct ~-~ .~ Nov Dec.96 ~~~ ~;-~~~~ \"} Technical Memorandum (Procedure Document) Submitted To Working Group/State 0 Technical Specifications Submitted To Working Group/State PlAN1 XLS ... Jan-97 Feb Mar Apr