Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCD980602163_19900306_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_Warren County vs State of North Carolina - Amendment to Answer First Set of Interrogatories-OCRRUFUS L. EDMISTEN ATTORNEY GENERAL MEMO TO: FROM: RE: Jibdt of ~orlq a!arolhm ~epudm1mt nf 3Jmdic.e P. o. Box 629 RALEIGH 27602 6 March 1980 Bob Adams, Bif er, Dave Kelly Bill & Attac hed An swer ta Inter rogatories -Warren County PCB Disposal Please t ake a look at the answers which I have p repared t o the Seco nd Set o f Interrogatories. I believe they accurately reflect the discussion at our meeting on March 4. If you see any errors or have any suggestions, please contact me by 3:00, Tuesday, March 11. /dw encl. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH DIVISION No. 79-560-CIV-5 WARREN COUNTY, ) AMENDMENT TO ANSWER TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES v. STATE OF Plaintiff, NORTH CAROLINA, ) ) ) ) ) ANSWER TO SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDAN'JS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AND BURLEY B. MITCHELL et a l., ) Defendants. ) TO: Norman B. Smith Smith, Patterson, Follin, Curtis, James & Harkavy 704 Southeastern Building Greensboro, North Carolina 27401 Charles T. Johnson Attorney at Law P. 0. Box 646 Warrenton, North Carolina 27589 Pursuant to Rule 26(e) and Rule 33 of the Rules of Civil Pro- cedure I hereby serve upon you the following Amendment to the Answers to the First Set of Interrogatories and the Answers to the Se cond Set of Int errogatories to Defendants State of North Carolina and Bur ley B. Mitchell served on defendants .on February 18, 1980. AMENDMENT TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES 1 .1 The total cost stated on page four (4) of Answer s to Interrogatories to Defendants State of North Carolina and Burley B . Mitche ll does not include the disposal fee which would be char ged by the operator of the Alabama site. The State has been unable to secure an estimate of the fee which would be charged by the operator of the site. ANSWER TO SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES 6. (a). The Che mical Waste Management Division of Waste Manage- ment Inc. (Company) has been contacted on several occasions. They have declined on each occasion to quote a price for disposal of the PCB contaminated soil. On the latest contact they declined to quote a price for transportation and disposal. From recent discussions with the Company it is apparent that they do not have the number of trucks necessary to provide a continuous pick up operation as pro- posed by the State of North Carolina. In response to questions by State officials, Company officials also indicated that the truc ks capable of carrying a 40,000 pound load could not be used in the type of pick up and loading operation proposed by the State. -2- Waste Management further informed the State that its base price for transportation and disposal had gone up from $2.24 per loaded mile to $2.96 per loaded mile. This price does not include the cost of loading. 6. (b). No, the defendants State of North Carolina and Burley B. Mitchell do not agree that the total transpor tation cost would be $3,386,880. The basi s for this disagreement is that the Company has refused to give an estimate to the State on the cost of transportation and disposal. The Company has indicated that if they would agree to accept the waste at all that the price would have to be negotiated. 6. (c). From our contacts with Waste Management Inc. we do not believe they have the present capability to engage in the loading and transport of the PCB materials nor is there any indication that they would do so if they had the capability. This the day of March, 1980. RUFUS L. EDMISTEN Attorney General By --::-:=---=---=-----=--------------w. A. Raney, Jr. Special Deputy Attorney General P.O. Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 919/733-5725 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing AMENDMENT TO ANSWER TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES and ANSWER TO SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANTS STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA AND BURLEY B. MITCHELL, on the attorneys of r e cord by depositing copies in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Norman B. Smith Smith, Patterson, Follin,. Curtis, James & Harkavy 704 Southeastern Building Greensboro, North Carolina 27401 Charles T. Johnson Attorney at Law P. 0. Box 646 Warrenton, North Carolina 27589 William W. Webb Assistant U.S. Attorney Federal Building New Bern Avenue Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 This the day of March, 1980. RUFUS L. EDMISTEN Attorney General W. A. Raney, Jr. Special Deputy Attorney General STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE -3- VERIFICATION W. A. RANEY, Jr ., first being sworn says: That he is attorne y of record for the State defendants in this action and t hat the foregoing answers were prepared b y him and under h is supervision by various employees of the North Carolina Oepartment o f Transportation , North Carolina Depar tment of Human Re sou r ces, and the North Carolina Department of Crime Control a nd Public Safety and that the same are true to the best of his knowledge save and e xcept those matters stated on informati on and b e lief, and as to those matters he believes them t o be t r ue. W. A. Raney, Jr. Spe cial Deputy Attorney General Sworn to and subscribed before me this the March, 19 8 0. My Commission Expires: 3/ /83 (SEAL ) Notary Public day o f ...