WA-26393_31591_M_C_20191213

From:Ward, Allison
To:Harrison CIV Elizabeth R
Subject:RE: [External] Site 3996, UST # 31591
Date:Friday, December 13, 2019 2:47:00 PM
Elizabeth,
Sylvia and I went back over these sites and we are good with making them two separate incidents in our system.
Site 130 will now be incident # 38785 and Site 3996 will remain incident # 31591.
Thanks!
AW
Allison Ward
Hydrogeologist, DWM - UST Section
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
252.946.6481 (Office)
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste-management/ust
Link to Leaking UST GIS MAP: USE MAP FOR LOCATING UST SITES ACROSS THE STATE
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste-management/waste-management-rules-data/waste-management-gis-maps

ALL UST ARCHIVED FILES CAN BE FOUND ON THE FOLLOWING LINK:
http://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WasteManagement/Search.aspx?cr=1
-----Original Message-----
From: Harrison CIV Elizabeth R [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 1:38 PM
To: Ward, Allison <[e-mail]>; Hunneke, Sylvia <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] Site 3996, UST # 31591
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as
an attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Allison & Sylvia,
Sites 130 and 3996 are under the same incident number and we would like to go ahead and try to get NFA with the
GW LUR for #3996. Would it be possible to separate the two sites, as they were prior to 2006? I have attached
some correspondence between EAD and NCDEQ from that time when the sites were combined.
We are planning to excavate Site 130 as part of a larger Military Construction project, but that is about 12 months
off and the bldg. where the Site 3996 remediation system is will be demo'd in the upcoming months to prepare for a
new Airfield Operations Building.
Please let me know if I can provide any additional information or answer any questions.
Thank you,
Elizabeth
Elizabeth Harrison
Restoration & Recycling DivisionEnvironmental Affairs DepartmentMCAS Cherry Point, [e-mail]
-----Original Message-----From: Ward, Allison <[e-mail]>Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2019 12:51 PMTo: Harrison CIV Elizabeth R <[e-mail]>Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] Site 3996, UST # 31591
Elizabeth,
I realized that I never replied back to this email.Yes, I agree with the doing the NFA with a GW restriction since there has been decreasing trends.Thanks!AW
Allison WardHydrogeologist, DWM - UST SectionNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Washington Regional Office943 Washington Square MallWashington, NC 27889252.946.6481 (Office)https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste-management/ust
Link to Leaking UST GIS MAP: USE MAP FOR LOCATING UST SITES ACROSS THE STATE
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste-management/waste-management-rules-data/waste-management-gis-maps
ALL UST ARCHIVED FILES CAN BE FOUND ON THE FOLLOWING LINK:
http://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WasteManagement/Search.aspx?cr=1
-----Original Message-----
From: Harrison CIV Elizabeth R [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 8:57 AMTo: Ward, Allison <[e-mail]>Subject: RE: [External] Site 3996, UST # 31591
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email asan attachment to [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Hi Allison,
Since we shut the system down on January 1, 2019, the Benzene levels in well 74GW23 have remained below the
GCL of 5,000 ug/L. Do you agree that we can petition NCDEQ for NFA with a GW LUR, as we discussed
earlier. We plan on including the request in the upcoming PMR.
System Shut Down in January 2019-
* February 2019 = 287 ug/L
* May 2019 = 836 ug/L
* August 2019 = 4,600 ug/L
* November 2019 = 2,760 ug/L
Thank you in advance,
Elizabeth
Elizabeth HarrisonRestoration & Recycling DivisionEnvironmental Affairs DepartmentMCAS Cherry Point, [e-mail]
-----Original Message-----From: Ward, Allison <[e-mail]>Sent: Friday, February 08, 2019 1:34 PMTo: Harrison CIV Elizabeth R <[e-mail]>Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: [External] Site 3996, UST # 31591
Elizabeth,
Sounds good in regards to pre-closeout sampling schedule for later this year. We will not need to sample all thewells, just the ones that have shown repeated contamination recently. And we do not need to add MADEPVPH/EPH to the sampling.Thanks!
Allison WardHydrogeologist, DWM - UST SectionNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Washington Regional Office943 Washington Square MallWashington, NC 27889252.946.6481 (Office)https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste-management/ust
Link to Leaking UST GIS MAP: USE MAP FOR LOCATING UST SITES ACROSS THE STATE
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste-management/waste-management-rules-data/waste-management-gis-maps
ALL UST ARCHIVED FILES CAN BE FOUND ON THE FOLLOWING LINK:
http://edocs.deq.nc.gov/WasteManagement/Search.aspx?cr=1
-----Original Message-----
From: Harrison CIV Elizabeth R [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 11:24 AMTo: Ward, Allison <[e-mail]>; Hunneke, Sylvia <[e-mail]>Subject: [External] Site 3996, UST # 31591
Allison & Sylvia,
We have an upcoming sampling event scheduled in February as part of our CAMP program and we are planning tobegin closure sampling at Site 3996, UST Incident #31591. This site's risk classification is Intermediate due to thepresence of free-phase product that was detected initially, however, no free-phase product has been detected at thissite since April 2013.
The benzene concentration in one well, MW74GW23, is the main regulatory driver at this site and was last abovethe Gross Contamination Level for groundwater (GCL) in February 2017 with the latest result being well below thatlevel. See below for a list of the Benzene results for the past three years for this well:
August 2015 = 10,900 ug/LFebruary 2016 = 4,590 ug/LAugust 2016 = 9,310 ug/LFebruary 2017 = 11,200 ug/LAugust 2017 = 3,700 ug/LFebruary 2018 = 4,900 ug/LAugust 2018 = 137 ug/LNovember 13, 2018 = 229 ug/L
The AS system was turned off on January 1, 2019 in order to monitor forrebound of the benzene and begin the closure sampling process. In additionto next month's sampling event, we will include sampling events in May, August & November, 2019, followed by arequest for NFA with a GW LUR if no significant rebound occurs within the year.
In planning the closure sampling events, two questions have been raised by our team:
1. Do we sample every on-site well or only those with hits and perimeter wells around plume?2. Do we need to add "MADEP VPH/EPH" to the sampling (currently sampling for SM 6200B and EPA 610).
Can you provide some guidance? This would help ensure we won't have to mobilize more than necessary and alsoprovide your office with all the required data.
R/S,
Elizabeth
Elizabeth HarrisonRestoration & Recycling DivisionEnvironmental Affairs DepartmentMCAS Cherry Point, [e-mail]