WS-4337_14039_CA_MRP_20230203_GW Monitoring Report

CES Group Engineers, LLP
IMPROVING. PROTECTING. RESTORING.

CHARLOTTE, NC

COLUMBIA, SC

www.ces-group.net

February 3, 2023

Scott Ryals, PE
Environmental Engineer
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
DWM UST Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646

RE: Groundwater Monitoring Report
Snyder’s Phillips 66
Incident No.: 14039
UST ID No.: WS-4337
Facility ID No.: 00-0-0000024996
823 West Center Street
Lexington, Davidson County, North Carolina 27292

Dear Mr. Ryals:

CES Group Engineers, LLP (CES), while under contract with the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Contract No.: N040722, executed on April 20, 2022, is
submitting this Groundwater Monitoring Report to you for the aforementioned property
electronically via email. The performed work was authorized by NCDEQ Task Authorization (TA)
#03, approved on November 21, 2022. Should you have any questions in regards to this
submittal, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].

Regards,

Greg Hans, PMP
Environmental Division Manager

Enclosures: Groundwater Monitoring Report

CES Project No. 7919.0522E
February 3, 2023
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT

Snyder’s Phillips 66
823 West Center Street
Lexington, Davidson County, North Carolina 27292
NCDEQ Incident No.: 14039
UST ID No.: WS-4337
Facility ID No.: 00-0-0000024996

February 3, 2023

Prepared for:

Mr. Scott Ryals
NCDEQ DWM UST Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646

Prepared by:

CES Group Engineers, LLP
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273

CES Project No. 7919.0522E
February 3, 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 SITE INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Identification ........................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Contact Information............................................................................................. 1
1.3 Release Information ............................................................................................ 1
1.4 Certification ......................................................................................................... 2
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES .................................................................................................. 5
4.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION ................................................................ 6
4.1 UST Owner and Operator Information ............................................................... 6
4.2 UST Information .................................................................................................. 7
4.3 Non-UST Information .......................................................................................... 7
4.4 Release Description ............................................................................................ 7
4.5 Site Characteristics ............................................................................................. 8
4.6 Affected Property Owners and Occupants ......................................................... 8
4.7 Receptor Information .......................................................................................... 9
4.8 Remedial Plan Implementation ......................................................................... 10
4.9 Remediation Progress ...................................................................................... 10
5.0 CURRENT SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ....................................................... 11
5.1 Water Level and Free Product Thickness Measurements ............................... 11
5.2 Groundwater Monitoring Event ......................................................................... 11
5.3 Surface Water Monitoring Event ....................................................................... 11
5.4 Soil Monitoring Events ...................................................................................... 11
5.5 Summary of Soil, Groundwater, Surface Water and Free Product Assessment
Information .................................................................................................................... 12
5.6 Site Geology and Hydrogeology ....................................................................... 13
5.7 Evaluation of Soil, Groundwater, Surface Water and Free Product Thickness
Information .................................................................................................................... 13
6.0 FREE PRODUCT REMOVAL ....................................................................................... 14
6.1 Free Product Current and Historical Status ..................................................... 14
6.2 Free Product Effluent Discharges and/or Recovery ......................................... 14
6.3 Free Product Recovery Methods ...................................................................... 14
6.4 Free Product Conclusions and Recommendations .......................................... 14
7.0 SOIL REMEDIATION .................................................................................................... 15
7.1 Soil Remediation Activities ............................................................................... 15
7.2 Chronology of Soil Remediation Activities (Corrective Action Plan) ................ 15
7.3 Costs of Soil Remediation Activities ................................................................. 15
8.0 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION .............................................................................. 16
8.1 Groundwater Remediation Activities ................................................................ 16
8.2 Chronology of Groundwater Remediation Activities (Corrective Action Plan) . 16
8.3 Costs of Groundwater Remediation Activities .................................................. 16

CES Project No. 7919.0522E
February 3, 2023
9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................ 17
9.1 Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 17
9.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................ 17
10.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 18

CES Project No. 7919.0522E
February 3, 2023
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN
FIGURE 3 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION PLAN (JANUARY 2023)
FIGURE 4 BENZENE AND MTBE GCL ISOCONCENTRATION AND EXTENT OF
CONTAMINATION PLAN (JULY AND OCTOBER 2022, AND JANUARY
2023)
TABLES
TABLE B-1 SITE HISTORY – UST/AST SYSTEM AND OTHER RELEASE
INFORMATION
TABLE B-2 SITE HISTORY – UST/AST OWNER/OPERATOR AND OTHER
RESPONSIBLE PARTY INFORMATION
TABLE B-3 SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TABLE B-4 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TABLE B-5 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WATER SUPPLY WELL AND OTHER RECEPTOR
INFORMATION
TABLE B-7 MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
TABLE B-9 CURRENT GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS AND FREE PRODUCT
THICKNESS
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A HISTORICAL DATA
APPENDIX B SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX C MONITORING FIELD DATA SHEETS, JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS, AND
HEALTH & SAFETY PLAN
APPENDIX D SOIL AND GROUNDWATER WELL LABORATORY REPORTS AND
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS
APPENDIX E WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD AND NCDEQ WELL PERMIT

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 1
February 3, 2023
1.0 SITE INFORMATION
1.1 Identification
Date of Report: February 3, 2023 Site Risk/Ranking: LOW
Facility I.D.:00-0-0000024996 UST Incident Number (if known): WS-4337
Site Name: Snyder’s Phillips 66
Street Address:823 West Center Street
City/Town:Lexington Zip Code: 27292 County: Davidson
Description of Geographical Data Point (e.g., UST):Approximate UST Field
Location Method (GPS, topographical map, online map, other):GIS Address Matching
Latitude (decimal degrees):35.83151 Longitude(decimal degrees): -80.26501
1.2 Contact Information
UST/AST Owner: Monroe Snyder Email: N/A
Address: 1301 Bringle Ferry Road, Denton, NC 27239 Tel: N/A
UST/AST Operator: Monroe Snyder Email: N/A
Address: 1301 Bringle Ferry Road, Denton, NC 27239 Tel: N/A
Property Owner: Harold & Betty Ruth Myers Email: N/A
Address: PO Box 1205, Lexington, NC 27293 Tel: N/A
Property Occupant: Monroe Service Station (out of
service) Email: N/A
Address: 823 West Center Street, Lexington, NC 27292 Tel: [phone]
Consultant/Contractor: CES Group Engineers, LLP. Email: [e-mail]
Address: 3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Ste150, Charlotte, NC 28273 Tel: [phone]
x1008
Analytical Laboratory: Waypoint Analytical State Certification No: 402
Address: 449 Springbrook Road, Charlotte, NC 28217 Tel: [phone]
Drilling Contractor: Carolina Soil Investigations Email: [e-mail]
Address: 132 Gurney Road, Olin, NC 28660 Tel: [phone]

1.3 Release Information
Date Discovered: 11/21/1991 (According to NCDEQ UST Incident Map)
Estimated Quantity of Release: Unknown
Cause of Release: Leaking product line
Source of Release (e.g., Dispenser/Piping/UST):Product Piping
Sizes and Contents of Tanks or Other Containment from which the Release
Occurred: Three (3) 6,000-gal
gasoline USTs




CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 2
February 3, 2023
1.4 Certification
I, Charles D. Heleine, a North Carolina Licensed Professional Engineer employed by CES,
do certify that the information contained in this report is accurate, to the best of my
knowledge.

E-Signature 02/03/2023

Charles D. Heleine, NC PE No. 27196

CES Group Engineers, LLP (CES) is licensed to practice engineering in North Carolina. The
firm license number is F-1240.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 3
February 3, 2023
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This Groundwater Monitoring Report (GW Report) summarizes petroleum hydrocarbon impacts in
groundwater from an apparent release of petroleum-related constituents from a retail petroleum
underground storage tank (UST or tank) system, located at the former Snyder’s Phillips 66, 823
West Center Street, Lexington, Davidson County, North Carolina (hereafter identified as the site,
subject site, subject property or property). CES Group Engineers, LLP (CES) has been authorized
to perform groundwater monitoring activities by the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), represented by Scott Ryals, PE, Environmental Engineer.

During this monitoring period, one permanent groundwater monitoring well (MW-6) was installed
along the southern property boundary, to a depth of approximately 35-feet below grade on January
19, 2023, in an attempt to delineate the horizontal extent of the contaminate plume towards the
south, with a soil sample collected from MW-6, and subsequent groundwater samples collected
from previously installed MW-5, and MW-6 on January 19, 2023 for analysis of petroleum
hydrocarbon constituents.

Petroleum-related constituent concentrations in soil were reported ABOVE the Soil to Water
Maximum Contaminant Concentration (MSCC) from the following monitoring well:

MW-6: benzene (0.037 mg/kg) and MTBE (0.598 mg/kg).

All other concentrations of petroleum-related constituents were reported below Soil to Water MSCC,
and Residential Soil Cleanup Levels and Industrial/Commercial MSCC from MW-6.

Petroleum hydrocarbon constituents in groundwater were reported ABOVE the 2L Standard from
the following monitoring wells:

MW-5: benzene (GCL), DIPE, chloroform, ethylbenzene, 2-hexanone, isopropyl
benzene, MTBE (GCL), 4-methyl 2-pentanone, naphthalene, n-propyl
benzene, styrene, toluene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene,
total xylenes, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, C11-C22
aromatics, C5-C8 aliphatic, C9-C12 aliphatic and C9-C10 aromatics.

MW-6: benzene, DIPE, MTBE, naphthalene, total xylenes, 1-methylnaphthalene,
C11-C22 aromatics, C5-C8 aliphatic, C9-C12 aliphatic and C9-C10
aromatics.

Petroleum hydrocarbon constituents in groundwater were reported ABOVE the GCL Standard from
the following monitoring wells:

MW-5: benzene and MTBE.

All other concentrations of petroleum-related constituents were reported below 2L and GCL
standards from MW-5 and MW-6.

It should be noted that monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 were previously installed at the site as
temporary monitoring wells in July of 2022 as part of Limited Site Assessment (LSA) activities, and
three permanent monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4 and MW-5 were installed on October 13, 2022 to
evaluate the extent of the contaminant plume. Previous groundwater analytical results reported
concentrations of benzene above the GCL from a groundwater sample collected from MW-1

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 4
February 3, 2023
(temporary well) in July 2022, and concentrations of benzene and MTBE above the GCL from a
groundwater sample collected from MW-5 (permanent well) in October 2022.

Free product has not been detected in any of the onsite groundwater monitoring wells.

According to information retrieved from the NCDEQ UST Incidents Map, the site was previously
assigned a Low-Risk classification by NCDEQ.

To date, no known receptors have been impacted by the reported petroleum release, nor are any
receptors known to be at an imminent risk of being impacted based on a limited review of current
groundwater conditions, including contaminant levels and the location of contaminants, and site
uses.

This report provides data necessary to fulfill a GW Monitoring Report, in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2L.0100, and is formatted in conformance with Appendix A of the Guidelines for Assessment
and Corrective Action for UST Releases, dated March 7, 2022.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 5
February 3, 2023
3.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of services for this report were authorized by NCDEQ Task Authorization (TA) #03,
approved on November 21, 2022, under CES Contract Number N040722, dated April 20, 2022. In
accordance with the approved TA, the scope of services included the following:

 Install up to one groundwater monitoring well along the southern property boundary to an
approximate depth of 35-feet below grade;

 Monitor and collect one soil sample during the installation of the new monitoring well for
laboratory analysis of 8260, including MTBE and IPE, and MassDEP VPH;

 Monitor and collect groundwater samples from up to two monitoring wells (MW-5 and MW-6)
for laboratory analysis by Standard Method (SM) 6200B, including MTBE, IPE and EDB,
EPA 625 BNA and MassDEP VPH and EPH; and

 Prepare and submit one groundwater monitoring report summarizing the field and laboratory
analytical findings.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 6
February 3, 2023
4.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION

The subject site where groundwater monitoring and sampling was performed, where contaminated
soil was discovered during the performance of upgrade work to an UST system in November 1991
(Incident Number 14039), consists of one parcel, identified as Davidson County Parcel Identification
Number (PIN) 1109200000001, and is situated at the intersection of West Center Street and Shoaf
Street, as shown on Figure 1. The site is located in an urban area of Lexington, Davidson County,
North Carolina, with West Center Street to the north, Shoaf Street to the west, an outlet store (The
Outlet Warehouse) to the east and a law firm (Smith Leonard PLLC) to the south, and is situated in
an area of mixed historical land use, including heavy commercial, residential, industrial and
manufacturing purposes. The site is currently utilized for minor automotive repairs on a periodic
basis. It is understood that three 6,000-gallon, single-wall steel, gasoline USTs remain in the
subsurface, and are located to the west of the onsite building, adjacent to Shoaf Street, and four
fuel dispensers are located to the north of the onsite building, adjacent to West Center Street.
Portions of the property to the north and west of the onsite building are surfaced with concrete. To
the east of the building is a grassy/soil-based surface. To the south of the onsite building is a
grassy area that slopes to the south. Figure 2 depicts pertinent site features.

The subject site was issued Incident Number 14039 in November, 1991, after soil contamination
was encountered from underneath product piping undergoing upgrades. In July of 2022, CES
completed a LSA at the site, which reported the presence of groundwater contamination from a
temporary monitoring well (MW-1) installed in the area of the November, 1991 product piping
upgrades.

Historical data sheets for the November 1991 product piping upgrade activities are included in
Appendix A. Site Photographs are included in Appendix B.

4.1 UST Owner and Operator Information
UST Owner/Operator: Monroe Snyder (deceased)
Address: 1301 Bringle Ferry Road, Denton, NC 27239
Phone: N/A

Person Associated
With Release: (Site accepted into State-Lead Acceptance Program)
Address: N/A
Phone: N/A

*Current Property Owner: Harold & Betty Ruth Myers
Address: PO Box 1205, Lexington, NC 27293
Phone: N/A

*Information retrieved from the Davidson County GIS Real Estate System

On April 26, 2022, the site was accepted into the NCDEQ State-Lead Acceptance Program to
conduct further investigative measures relative to Incident Number 14039.

Additional responsible party information is provided in Table B-1 and Table B-2, and above in
Section 1.2.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 7
February 3, 2023
4.2 UST Information
According to the NCDEQ Registered Tanks Database, the retail petroleum UST system (three
6,000-gasoline USTs) lists an installation date of May 13, 1964, with no permanently closed date
listed, with the UST system last owned and operated by Monroe Snyder. According to reviewed
information, it is unknown when the UST system was last in operation. Additionally, during LSA
field activities conducted in July of 2022, a heating oil UST was presumed to exist, adjacent to the
east facing exterior wall of the onsite building, based upon observations of a fill port emanating from
the subsurface, and a vent pipe attached to the exterior wall of the onsite building.

A general summary of the UST system is presented below, with further information included in
Tables B-1 and B-2:

UST ID No Current/Last
Contents
Capacity
(gallons)
Date
Installed
Permanently
Closed
Discovery of
Release
1 Gasoline 6,000 5/13/1964 No Yes
2 Gasoline 6,000 5/13/1964 No Yes
3 Gasoline 6,000 5/13/1964 No Yes
4 Waste Oil (Or
Diesel)
550 5/8/1994 8/30/1999 Yes (Incident
No. 20707)
5 Presumed
Heating Oil
Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown

The approximate locations and orientation of the USTs are depicted on Figure 2.

4.3 Non-UST Information
One above ground storage tank (AST) was identified onsite during the LSA completed in July of
2022, and is summarized below:

AST ID No Current/Last
Contents
Use Secondary
Containment
Location
1 Presumed Heating
Oil
Heating Oil No Adjacent to SE
corner of onsite
building
extension

The approximate location of the AST is depicted on Figure 2.

4.4 Release Description
As reported by Enviro-Tank, Inc (Enviro-Tank) during upgrades to the retail petroleum UST system
and subsequent collection of soil samples near the tank system in November, 1991, soil sample 2
collected from underneath the UST systems product piping, at a depth of approximately 12-feet
below grade, reported elevated concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), identified as
gasoline.

During the completion of the LSA by CES in July of 2022, groundwater samples collected from
temporary monitoring well MW-1, located in the area of the soil sample 2 (collected in 1991 as

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 8
February 3, 2023
referenced above), reported petroleum-related constituents above 2L Standards, with a
concentration of benzene (7,890 ug/l) reported above the GCL Standard.

Groundwater sampling activities completed after the installation of three permanent groundwater
monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4 and MW-5 in October, 2022, reported petroleum-related constituents
above 2L Standards in MW-3 and MW-5, with concentrations of benzene (9,700 ug/l) and MTBE
(34,300 ug/l) reported above the GCL Standard in MW-5, which is located to the south, and
downgradient of the existing USTs.

The approximate location of the UST system in relation to the groundwater monitoring wells at the
site is depicted on Figure 2.

4.5 Site Characteristics
The subject property is zoned as City Zoning B in Lexington, according to Davidson County GIS
Real Estate Maps, and includes one parcel, with Davidson County Parcel Identification Number
(PIN) 1109200000001, occupying an area of approximately 0.5-acre. According to Davidson
County GIS Real Estate Maps, the Highest and Best Use of the subject property has been identified
as a Service Station. The adjoining property to the north of the site is West Center Street, with a
large commercial or industrial building (D.H. Griffin Companies) located across West Center Street.
The adjoining property to the east of the site is occupied by a commercial building (The Outlet
Warehouse). The adjoining property to the south of the site is occupied by a commercial building
(Smith Leonard PLLC). The adjoining property to the west is Shoaf Street public right-of-way, with
a commercial building (Leonard Cleaners) located across Shoaf Street.

The subject property currently operates as an unnamed minor automotive repair facility on a
periodic basis. It is understood that future plans for the subject property include the operation as a
full-time gasoline service station, including automotive repairs and the retail sale of gasoline from
the existing UST system. The three 6,000-gallon, single-wall steel, gasoline USTs that remain in
the subsurface are located to the west of the onsite building, adjacent to Shoaf Street, and four fuel
dispensers are located to the north of the onsite building, adjacent to West Center Street. The one-
story, slab on grade, onsite structure contains approximately 4,200-square feet, includes an
attached canopy, three service bays with overhead garage doors, an office area, and also includes
a Barber Shop and Salon operating within the west-southwestern portion of the onsite building, and
was reportedly constructed in the year 1951. No further information relative to the onsite building
was readily available.

The site is situated along the south line of West Center Street, a four (4)-lane, asphalt surfaced,
rural section roadway, and is intersected by Shoaf Street, a two (2)-lane, asphalt surfaced, rural
section roadway. The subject site is served by electrical utilities, with the presumed heating oil UST
and heating oil AST providing a source of heat for the automotive repair facility and the Barber and
Salon, respectively. Public water distribution and sanitary sewer services are available to serve the
site.

The site location in relation to area land use is illustrated in Figures 1 and 2.

4.6 Affected Property Owners and Occupants
The subject site where the contamination was initially discovered in November, 1991, with

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 9
February 3, 2023
contamination remaining in-situ, as evident by groundwater analytical results reported from
temporary monitoring well MW-1 sampled during the LSA in July of 2022, from monitoring wells
MW-3 and MW-5 sampled during a groundwater monitoring event on October 14, 2002, and from
monitoring wells MW-5 and MW-6 sampled during this monitoring event in January 2023, have
come to be generally located in the area of the UST system, as well as downgradient of the UST
system towards the south.

The 2L groundwater contaminate plume extends southerly beyond monitoring well MW-6 for an
unknown extent, and potentially extends to the west-southwest. Based on laboratory analytical
results from monitoring well MW-6 in January, 2023, reporting groundwater concentrations below
the GCL Standard, the GCL groundwater contaminate plume currently does not extend to
monitoring well MW-6. Based on collected data, adjoining property owners and occupants to the
south and west-southwest of the site may be affected, due to the reasonable expectation that
groundwater impacts would be present on these properties.

4.7 Receptor Information
Water Supply Wells:
Conducting a water supply well receptor survey was outside the scope of services for this
groundwater monitoring event. However, in accordance with the LSA completed by CES at the site
in July of 2022, one water supply well that is not used for drinking water purposes is located at 200
Shoaf Street, approximately 600 feet to the south of the site. The property owner, Mr. Michael
Smith, confirmed that the property at 200 Shoaf Street is connected to, and served by, the
municipal water distribution system, and the water supply well is not used for drinking water
purposes.

Public Water Supplies:
No public water supplies are known to exist within a 1,500-feet radius of the subject property.

Municipal water distribution systems provided by the City of Lexington are available to serve the
subject property and surrounding properties.

Surface Water:
According to the NC SWAP website, Michael Branch, a Class C surface water body, is located
approximately 750-feet to the west of the source area at its nearest point. Class C surface waters
are protected for uses such as aquatic life propagation, survival and maintenance of biological
integrity (including fishing and fish), wildlife, secondary contact recreation, and agriculture.
Secondary contact recreation means wading, boating, other uses not involving human body contact
with water, and activities involving human body contact with water, where such activities take place
on an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental basis.

Wellhead Protection Areas:
According to the NC SWAP website, no wellhead protection areas are in Davidson County.

Deep Aquifers in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Region:
Not Applicable to the subject site.

Subsurface Structures:
Underground utilities have been identified at and adjacent to the subject site, and the potential
exists for soil and groundwater contamination to be in contact with these underground utilities.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 10
February 3, 2023
Groundwater has historically been measured at approximately 24 to 27-feet below ground surface
at the site. Because the underground utilities are expected to be at a substantially shallower depth
than 24 to 27-feet, the utility lines would not be considered receptors or conduits for ground water
contaminant migration. No subsurface structures have been identified at the site, except for the
existing USTs.

Table B-5 summarizes public and private water supply well and other receptor information.

4.8 Remedial Plan Implementation
To date, it is the understanding of CES that a remedial plan has not been submitted and/or
implemented for the subject site.
4.9 Remediation Progress
Not Applicable.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 11
February 3, 2023
5.0 CURRENT SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION

Prior to the commencement of field monitoring and sampling activities, CES prepared and reviewed
a site-specific Job Hazards Analysis (JHA) and Emergency Management and Health & Safety Plan
(HASP), acknowledging that potential hazards exist onsite, and were properly recognized and
evaluated by onsite personnel. A copy of the site-specific JHA and HASP are included in Appendix
C.
5.1 Water Level and Free Product Thickness Measurements
During this monitoring period, depth to groundwater measurements were collected from MW-5 and
MW-6.

Depth to groundwater was measured and recorded utilizing a water level meter capable of detecting
light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL or Free Product) to an accuracy of 0.01 feet.

Free product was not detected in any site related monitoring wells, nor has been detected in any
onsite monitoring wells.

After measuring depth to groundwater at each monitoring well, the water level meter was
decontaminated by using a soapy water mixture (alconox and water).

Depth to groundwater ranged from 26.64 feet below top of casing (TOC) in MW-5 to 24.95 feet
below TOC in MW-6, on January 19, 2023. Based on visual observations and historical data,
groundwater flow direction is anticipated to flow in a southerly direction. A summary of depth to
groundwater measurements are included in Appendix C and on Table B-9.

5.2 Groundwater Monitoring Event
After collecting depth to groundwater measurements, and after calculating the volume of water to be
removed from MW-5 and MW-6, a dedicated 1.5-inch disposable bailer was used to develop MW-6
utilizing surging methods, and then approximately three to five well volumes were purged from each
monitoring well on January 19, 2023, utilizing dedicated disposable bailers for each well.
Groundwater samples were then collected on January 19, 2023 in laboratory provided glassware,
placed on ice and submitted under chain of custody (COC) procedures to Waypoint Analytical
(Waypoint), of Charlotte, NC, for analysis of SM 6200B including MTBE, IPE and EDB, 625 BNA,
VPH and EPH.

5.3 Surface Water Monitoring Event
Not Applicable. No surface water monitoring events were conducted during this groundwater
monitoring and sampling event.

5.4 Soil Monitoring Events
On January 19, 2023, one permanent groundwater monitoring well (MW-6) was installed along the
southern property boundary in an attempt to delineate the horizontal extent of the contaminate
plume toward the south. MW-6 was installed approximately 42-feet to the south of MW-5. During

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 12
February 3, 2023
the installation of MW-6, encountered soils were field screened in 5-foot increments, from grade to
approximately 35 feet below grade, with a MiniRAE 2000 photoionization detector (PID), calibrated
to detect volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in parts per million per volume (ppmv). PID
measurements from the installation of groundwater monitoring well MW-6 are presented below:

Date Monitoring Well Depth (feet) PID (ppmv)
01/19/2023 MW-6 0 - 5 0.0
5 - 10 0.0
10 - 15 0.0
15 - 20 0.0
20 - 25 0.0
25 - 30 197

During the installation of MW-6 on January 19, 2023, one soil sample was collected immediately
above the water table, at a depth of approximately 25-feet below grade, placed in laboratory
provided vials and glassware, stored on ice, and hand delivered under chain-of-custody (COC)
procedures on January 20, 2023 to Waypoint for laboratory analysis of VOCs by 8260 and VPH
MassDEP methodologies.

Monitoring well construction information for MW-6 is included on Table B-7. Well construction
records, provided by the driller, Carolina Soil Investigations, Inc, and a monitoring well construction
permit, Permit Number WM0401424, issued by the NCDEQ Division of Water Resources, are
included in Appendix E.
5.5 Summary of Soil, Groundwater, Surface Water and Free Product Assessment
Information
Petroleum-related constituent concentrations in soil were reported ABOVE the Soil to Water
Maximum Contaminant Concentration (MSCC) from the following monitoring well:

MW-6: benzene (0.037 mg/kg) and MTBE (0.598 mg/kg).

All other concentrations of petroleum-related constituents were reported below Soil to Water MSCC,
and Residential Soil Cleanup Levels and Industrial/Commercial MSCC from MW-6.

Petroleum hydrocarbon constituents in groundwater were reported ABOVE the 2L Standard from
the following monitoring wells:

MW-5: benzene (GCL), DIPE, chloroform, ethylbenzene, 2-hexanone, isopropyl
benzene, MTBE (GCL), 4-methyl 2-pentanone, naphthalene, n-propyl
benzene, styrene, toluene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene,
total xylenes, 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, C11-C22
aromatics, C5-C8 aliphatic, C9-C12 aliphatic and C9-C10 aromatics.

MW-6: benzene, DIPE, MTBE, naphthalene, total xylenes, 1-methylnaphthalene,
C11-C22 aromatics, C5-C8 aliphatic, C9-C12 aliphatic and C9-C10
aromatics.

Petroleum hydrocarbon constituents in groundwater were reported ABOVE the GCL Standard from
the following monitoring wells:

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 13
February 3, 2023
MW-5: benzene and MTBE.

All other concentrations of petroleum-related constituents were reported below 2L and GCL
standards from MW-5 and MW-6.

Previous groundwater analytical results reported concentrations of benzene above the GCL from a
groundwater sample collected from MW-1 (temporary well) in July 2022, and concentrations of
benzene and MTBE above the GCL from a groundwater sample collected from MW-5 (permanent
well) in October 2022.

A groundwater elevation plan for the January 19, 2023 groundwater monitoring event is included as
Figure 3. A benzene and MTBE isoconcentration plan for the July 14, 2022, October 14, 2022 and
January 19, 2023 groundwater sampling events is included as Figure 4. A summary of soil and
groundwater analytical results are included on Table B-3 and B-4, respectfully. Copies of soil and
groundwater laboratory analytical reports are included as Appendix D.
5.6 Site Geology and Hydrogeology
According to the Geological Map of North Carolina (1985), the subject site is located within the
mafic metavolcanic rocks of the Charlotte and Milton Belts. Mafic metavolcanic rocks are
characterized as metamorphosed basaltic to andesitic tuffs and flows, greyish green to black, and
locally includes hypabyssal intrusives and minor felsic metavolcanic rocks.

Based upon groundwater surface elevations, as measured from onsite monitoring wells in July and
October 2022, and in January 2023, as summarized in Table B-9, and from onsite observations
relative to the general gradient at the site, apparent groundwater movement across the site is
presumed to flow in a southerly direction. A groundwater elevation plan for the January 19, 2023
groundwater monitoring event, depicting the groundwater elevations and apparent flow direction to
the south, is presented as Figure 3.
5.7 Evaluation of Soil, Groundwater, Surface Water and Free Product Thickness
Information
Based upon petroleum-related constituents reported above the 2L Standard from monitoring wells
MW-1 (temporary), MW-3, MW-5 and MW-6, and above the GCL Standard in monitoring wells MW-
1 (temporary) and MW-5, which were installed upgradient (MW-1 and MW-3) and downgradient
(MW-5) of the existing UST system, the extent of the contaminant plume is estimated to potentially
extend west-southwesterly towards, and across Shoaf Street, and extends southerly toward and
beyond the adjoining property to the south of the site.

The estimated extent of the 2L and GCL contaminant plumes, as reported by benzene and MTBE
concentrations, is depicted on Figure 4.

Free product was not detected in any of the onsite groundwater monitoring wells.

No surface water monitoring events were conducted during this groundwater monitoring and
sampling event.

The data obtained and reported herein is representative of conditions only at the referenced
monitoring well locations, and is not necessarily indicative of conditions elsewhere on the subject
site.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 14
February 3, 2023
6.0 FREE PRODUCT REMOVAL
6.1 Free Product Current and Historical Status
Not Applicable. Free product has not been detected from onsite groundwater monitoring wells.
6.2 Free Product Effluent Discharges and/or Recovery
Not Applicable. Free product has not been detected from onsite groundwater monitoring wells.
6.3 Free Product Recovery Methods
Not Applicable. Free product has not been detected from onsite groundwater monitoring wells.
6.4 Free Product Conclusions and Recommendations
Not Applicable. Free product has not been detected from onsite groundwater monitoring wells.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 15
February 3, 2023
7.0 SOIL REMEDIATION
7.1 Soil Remediation Activities
Not Applicable. Soil remediation activities were not performed during this groundwater monitoring
event.
7.2 Chronology of Soil Remediation Activities (Corrective Action Plan)
Not Applicable. Soil remediation activities were not performed during this groundwater monitoring
event.
7.3 Costs of Soil Remediation Activities
Not Applicable. Soil remediation activities were not performed during this groundwater monitoring
event.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 16
February 3, 2023
8.0 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION
8.1 Groundwater Remediation Activities
Not Applicable. Groundwater remediation activities were not performed during this groundwater
monitoring event.
8.2 Chronology of Groundwater Remediation Activities (Corrective Action Plan)
Not Applicable. Groundwater remediation activities were not performed during this groundwater
monitoring event.
8.3 Costs of Groundwater Remediation Activities
Not Applicable. Groundwater remediation activities were not performed during this groundwater
monitoring event.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 17
February 3, 2023
9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

9.1 Conclusions
The findings of the January 19, 2023 groundwater monitoring and sampling event are as follows:

 One groundwater monitoring well (MW-6) was installed to an approximate depth of 35-feet
below grade;
 Field screening measurements during the installation of MW-6 ranged from non-detect (Ie,
0.0 ppmv) to 197 ppmv, collected at a depth of approximately 25-feet below grade;
 One soil sample was collected during the installation of MW-6, at a depth of approximately
25-feet below grade, and analyzed for 8260 and MassDEP VPH;
 Two groundwater monitoring wells (MW-5 and MW-6) were monitored and sampled for SM
6200B including MTBE, IPE and EDB, 625 BNA, VPH and EPH;
 LNAPL or Free Product was not detected in MW-5 and MW-6;
 Depth to groundwater measurement ranged from 26.64 feet below TOC in MW-5 to 24.95
feet below TOC in MW-6;
 Apparent groundwater flow direction is to the south;
 Petroleum constituents in soil were reported ABOVE Soil MSCC in MW-6;
 Petroleum constituents in groundwater were reported ABOVE the 2L Standard in MW-5 and
MW-6; and
 Petroleum constituents (benzene and MTBE) in groundwater were reported ABOVE the
GCL Standard in MW-5.
9.2 Recommendations
Based upon groundwater concentration levels reported above the 2L Standard from monitoring
wells MW-3, MW-5 and MW-6, and above the GCL Standard from monitoring well MW-5 during this
monitoring period, and with the previous 2L and GCL exceedance from temporary monitoring well
MW-1 (July 2022), it is recommended that an additional monitoring well be installed on the adjoining
property to the south of the subject site, in an attempt to delineate the 2L groundwater contaminate
plume, and active remedial alternatives, ie enhanced vapor fluid recovery (AVFR) or equivalent, be
explored to mitigate the GCL groundwater contaminate plume.

Additionally, an evaluation (ie, tank, line and apparatuses testing) of the existing UST system is
recommended to determine if the tanks should be removed from the subsurface, or if the tank
system can be reactivated for the retail sale of petroleum, according to proposed future plans at the
subject property.

CES Project No. 7919.0522E Page 18
February 3, 2023
10.0 REFERENCES

Enviro-Tank, Inc of Matthews, North Carolina. UST Upgrade Work Summary Letter, dated
December 5, 1991.

CES Group Engineers, LLP of Charlotte, NC. Phase I Limited Site Assessment dated August 1,
2022.

CES Group Engineers, LLP of Charlotte, NC. Groundwater Monitoring Report dated October 31,
2022.

FIGURES

DRAWN BY: BN
CHECKED BY: GH
PROJECT NUMBER:
7919.0522 ED
DRAWING TITLE:
SHEET NUMBER:
SEAL:PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CES GROUP ENGINEERS, LLP
NC FIRM LICENSE #F-1240 3525 WHITEHALL PARK DRIVESUITE 150CHARLOTTE, NC 28273T 704. 489.1500 www.ces-group.net
DATE: 02/02/2023
SCALE : 1" = 20'Site Plan
DRAWN BY: BN
CHECKED BY: GH
PROJECT NUMBER:
7919.0522 ED
DRAWING TITLE:
SHEET NUMBER:
SEAL:PROJECT DESCRIPTION:CES GROUP ENGINEERS, LLP
NC FIRM LICENSE #F-1240 3525 WHITEHALL PARK DRIVESUITE 150CHARLOTTE, NC 28273T 704. 489.1500 www.ces-group.net
DATE: 02/02/2023
SCALE : 1" = 20'Groundwater Elevation Plan (January 2023)
DRAWN BY: BN
CHECKED BY: GH
PROJECT NUMBER:
7919.0522 ED
DRAWING TITLE:
SHEET NUMBER:
SEAL:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
CES GROUP ENGINEERS, LLP
NC FIRM LICENSE #F-1240 3525 WHITEHALL PARK DRIVESUITE 150CHARLOTTE, NC 28273T 704. 489.1500 www.ces-group.net
DATE: 02/02/2023
SCALE : 1" = 20'Benzene and MTBE GCL Isoconcentration andExtent of Contamination Plan (July & October 2022, & January 2023)
Table B-1: Site History – UST/AST System and Other Release Information
Revision Date: 10/14/2022 Incident Number and Name: 14039; Snyders UST ID#: WS-4337
Yes
3 Petroleum Gasoline 6,000 Single-Wall
Steel Unknown Single-Wall
Steel 5/13/1964
In-Active /
Not in
Service
Yes
Unknown Single-Wall
Steel
Unknown Single-Wall
Steel
2 Petroleum Gasoline 6,000 Single-Wall
Steel
4 Waste Oil /
Petroleum
Waste Oil (or
Diesel)550 Single-Wall
Steel
Yes
Description of
Associated
Piping and
Pumps
Was release
associated with
the UST
System?
Status of USTDate Tank
Installed
Single-Wall
Steel 5/13/1964
In-Active /
Not in
Service
5/13/1964
In-Active /
Not in
Service
5/8/1994
Permanently
Closed /
Removed
8/30/1999
No
(Associated
with Incident
20707)
UST ID
Number
Petroleum 6,000
Single-Wall
Steel Unknown1 Gasoline
Tank Dimensions
(diameter x
length)
Construction
Details
Capacity (in
gallons)
Previous
Contents
Current/Last
Contents
5 Presumed
Heating Oil
Presumed
Heating Oil Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown
Page 1 of 2
Table B-1: Site History – UST/AST System and Other Release Information
Revision Date: 10/14/2022 Incident Number and Name: 14039; Snyders UST ID#: WS-4337
1 Presumed
Heating Oil Unknown 250 Steel Unknown Unknown Unknown
Presumed
Active No
Incident
Number
Material
Released Date of Release
14039 Petroleum 11/21/1995
Description of
Associated
Piping and
Pumps
Was release
associated with
the AST
System?
Date Tank
Installed
AST ID
Number
Current/Last
Contents *
Previous
Contents *
Capacity (in
gallons)
Construction
Details **Tank Dimensions Status of AST
***
Description of Release
Presence of contaminated soils from underneath product piping reported above NCDEQ Action Levels
Page 2 of 2
Table B-2: Site History - UST/AST Owner/Operator and
Other Responsible Party Information
Revision Date: 10/14/2022 Incident Number and Name: 14039; Snyders
UST ID#: WS-4337
2
3
4
5
State Zip
NC 27239
State Zip
NC 27292
State Zip
Street Address
Monroe Snyder
UST ID 1-3 (5/11/1964 to presently in-active)
UST ID 4 (5/8/1994 to 8/30/1999) UST ID 6
(Unknown)
UST ID
Number
1
Facility ID Number
Name of Owner Dates of Operation
(mm/dd/yy to mm/dd/yy)
00-0-0000024996
City Telephone Number
Denton NA
1301 Bringle Ferry Road
Name of Other Responsible Party Dates of Release(s)
(mm/dd/yy to mm/dd/yy)
Street Address
City Telephone Number
Lexington 336-248-5639
Incident
Number 14039
Street Address
823 West Center Street
City Telephone Number
Name of Operator Dates of Operation
(mm/dd/yy to mm/dd/yy)
Monroe Snyders / Snyder's Phillips 66 See above
Page 1 of 1
Table B-3: Summary of Soil Analytical ResultsRevision Date: 02/01/2023 Incident No's. 14039; Snyders Phillips 66 UST ID#: WS-14039
6010D 6010D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8260D 8270E 8270E 8270E
MADEP-
EPH
MADEP-
EPH
MADEP-
VPH
MADEP-
VPH
MADEP-
VPH
Sample ID Date Collected
(m/dd/yy)
Source Area (eg. Tank Grave)
Sample Depth (feet
BGS)
PID (ppmv)
MW-1 7/14/22
Product Piping (14039)17-18' 1675.0 2.64 J 7.89 BDL 0.976 1.3 0.65 BDL 9.97 BDL 1.59 0.304 BDL 0.207 4.92 5.52 0.092 J 22.5 33.6 9.71 18.3 38.1 56.4 0.892 1.75 1.04 15.8 J BDL 128 355 210
MW-2 7/14/22
Waste Oil (or Diesel UST) (20707)12-13' 0.0 16 22.8 0.019 J BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.002 J BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 387 BDL BDL BDL
MW-6 1/19/23
Downgradient of
Gasoline UST/Product Piping (14039)
23-24' 197.0 N/A N/A 0.026 J 0.037 BDL BDL 0.040 0.026 0.012 J 0.001 J BDL 0.011 J 0.598 0.014 0.003 J BDL 0.071 0.028 0.003 J 0.038 0.089 1.28 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A BDL BDL BDL
3.8 270 24 0.0072 2.4 2.2 0.32 8 0.17 1.3 0.12 16 0.085 0.2 1.4 0.9 5.4 6.6 6.6 NA NA 6 0.054 1.5 0.2 540 NA 68 540 31
1.32 400 14000 12 782 1560 156 60.3 78.2 1560 1560 9380 156 5.5 1560 3120 1250 156 156 NA NA 3120 22.8 62.5 5.5 1560 31200 625 1500 469
6.54 400 210000 59.4 11600 23300 2330 297 1160 23300 23300 140000 1810 27 23300 46700 18600 2330 2330 NA NA 46700 112 934 27 23300 467000 9340 40000 12264
Feet BGS = feet below ground surface
mg/kg =milligrams per kilogram
ppmv: parts per million per volume as detected by MiniRAE2000 photoionization detector (PID)
BDL = Below Laboratory Detection Limit
NA = Not applicableHighlighted Yellow / Bold = Values exceeding the Soil-to-Water Soil Standard
Highlighted Green / Bold = Values exceeding the Residential Soil Cleanup Standard
Highlighted Red / Bold = Values exceeding Soil-to-Water, Residential and Industrial/Commercial Standards
Concentrations compared to Table - 1, Rev 10/5/2021, Site Checks, Tank Closure, and Initial Response and Abatement (same as current version of Table 1 - Assessment and Corrective Action for UST ReleasesDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)2-HexanoneMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)C19-C36 AliphaticsC9-C12 AliphticsToluene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzeneo-Xylenem,p-XyleneXylenes1-Methylnaphthalene2-MethylnaphthaleneNaphthaleneAcetoneSoil-to-Water Maximum Contaminant Concentration (mg/kg)
Residential Soil Cleanup Levels (mg/kg)BenzeneIndustrial/Commercial MSCC (mg/kg)C9-C10 AromaticsAnalytical Method (e.g., VOCs by 8260D) 
Contaminant of Concern (mg/kg) ChromiumLeadC5-C8 Aliphaticsn-Butylbenzenesec-ButylbenzeneEthylbenzeneIsopropylbenzene4-Isopropyl benzeneMTBENaphthalenen-PropylbenzeneStyreneC9-C18 Aliphatics
Table B-4: Summary of Groundwater Analytical ResultsRevision Date: 01/30/2023 Incident Number and Name: Incident No. 14039; Snyder's UST ID#: WS-4337
6010D 6010D 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 625.1 625.1 625.1 625.1 504.1
MADEP EPH MADEP EPH MADEP VPH MADEP VPH MADEP VPH
Sample ID Date Collected (m/dd/yy)
Incident Phase
MW-1 * 7/14/22 LSA 6 BDL BDL 7890 13.2 22.6 17.6 412 51.2 3820 332 172 8.23 133 1790 88.8 638 408 73.5 452 3010 J 692 41700 3260 807 BDL BDL BDL 6910 14700 21600 BDL 39 77.2 289 0.0787 1840 513 97700 55700 9360
MW-2 * 7/14/22 LSA BDL 5 J 14.2 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.472 J BDL BDL BDL 1.72 J BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.958 0.879 0.287 BDL BDL BDL 0.899 1.67 2.57 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 47.8 BDL BDL BDL BDL
MW-3 10/14/22 GWR NA NA BDL 37.9 BDL BDL BDL 80.1 BDL 15.5 BDL 2.09 J BDL BDL 696 BDL BDL 3.30 J BDL BDL BDL BDL 89.9 20.3 4.23 J BDL BDL BDL 35.7 72.4 108 BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 38.7 J BDL 350 256 115
MW-4 10/14/22 GWR NA NA BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.233 J BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.383 J BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
MW-5 10/14/22 GWR NA NA 2880 9700 BDL 22.2 13.8 1500 69 3940 738 139 5.85 929 34300 BDL 720 360 60.9 BDL BDL BDL 49600 3020 728 BDL BDL BDL 6750 13700 20500 BDL 55.5 112 475 BDL 1990 964 98100 52600 9930
MW-5 1/19/23 GWR NA NA 2910 J 11500 BDL BDL 13.3 1590 77 4920 943 J 137 BDL 968 30700 397 817 343 70.3 BDL BDL BDL 62300 3200 750 BDL BDL BDL 8480 17200 25700 BDL 43.3 84.8 394 BDL BDL 1290 99700 51500 7390
MW-6 1/19/23 GWR NA NA BDL 307 BDL BDL BDL 232 BDL 265 BDL 17.4 BDL BDL 2270 BDL 70.9 45.7 BDL BDL BDL BDL 373 274 19.8 BDL BDL BDL 248 932 1180 BDL 8.73 12.6 31.5 BDL 90.1 J 285 1650 3450 786
10 15 6000 1 10 70 70 70 70 600 40 70 25 4000 20 100 6 70 70 NA 40 128 600 400 400 0.2 3 2000 NA NA 500 100 1 30 6 0.4 700 200 400 700 200
10000 15000 6000000 5000 100000 5900 8800 70000 70000 80000 40000 30500 11700 4000000 20000 100000 6000 26100 70000 NA 40000 128000 260000 28500 24100 200 3000 550000 NA NA 50000 100000 1000 12000 6000 400 NA NA NA NA NA
µg/l = Micrograms per LiterGCL = Gross Contamination Level
BDL = Below Laboratory Detection LimitNA = Not ApplicableJ = Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentrationConcentrations in BOLD and Highlighted Yellow reported above 2L Standards
Concentrations in BOLD and Highlighted Red reported above GCL StandardsConstituents not listed above were reported as BDLs
Laboratory analysis performed by Waypoint Analytical, Inc of Charlotte, NC (NC Certification No. 402)*Installed as temporary monitoring wells on July 14, 2022 1,2-DibromoethaneC9-C18 AliphaticC11-C22 AromaticC5-C8 AliphaticC9-C12 AliphaticNaphthaleneChloroformTrichloroetheneTrichlorofluoromethanetert-Amyl Alcohol (TAA)tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME)2-HexanoneMethyl ethyl ketone (MEK)Styrenetert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA)Analytical Method (e.g., VOCs by EPA 6200B) 
Contaminant of Concern (mg/kg) AcetoneXylene (Total)C9-C10 Aromaticn-Propyl benzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzeneo-Xylenem,p-XyleneTetrachloroethane (1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane)TolueneDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)2,4-Dimethylphenol1-Methylnaphthalene2-MethylnaphthaleneGCL (ug/L)Isopropyl benzene4-Isoproply tolueneNaphthalenesec-Butyl benzene2L Standard (ug/L)Benzenen-ButylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)4-Methyl 2-Pentanone (MIBK)EthylbenzeneChromiumLeadBromomethane
Table B-5: Public and Private Water Supply Well and Other Receptor Information
Revision Date: 10/21/2022 Incident No. 14039; Snyders UST ID#: WS-4437
Water Supply Well and Other Receptor Information
1 WSW Michael Smith Owner 336-240-1072
200 Shoaf Street,
Lexington, NC Unknown 35.82991
-80.26625 IA / NP 600 Down
Additional Information for Water Supply Wells (and Other Receptors, if applicable)
Well # / ID
(same as
above)
Public Water:
Connected /
Available / Not
Available
Well Currently Used
for:
Active /
Inactive /
Abandoned
Construction
Method and
Well Type
Total Depth (ft
BGS)
Screened
Interval (x to y
ft BGS)
ft BGS = Feet below ground surface
Distance from
Source (ft)
Street Address for
Receptor
* Ex: WSW = Water Supply Well, SWB = Surface Water Body, Resvr = Reservoir, PWS = Public Water Supply, PW = Public Well, SW = Supply Well, WPA = Wellhead Protection Areas, RA = Recharge Areas (for
deep aquifers), Sub = Subsurface Structures, Con = Conduits, Other:
** The location and/or latitude/longitude (IN DECIMAL DEGREES) must be sufficiently accurate and precise to allow easy location of wells (or recovery if buried/paved/covered-over, lost, or otherwise damaged) and
for the location / replication of sampling points for any other receptor. Coordinates of Well # 3-11 are estimated based on physical location of onsite structure
*** Status: A = Active or IA = Inactive *and* Use: P = Potable or NP = Non-Potable Use. (Describe further in Additional Information for Water Supply Wells table below.)
Up or
Downgradient
(if known)
Well # Contact Name
Source
Status & Use
***
Type *Owner/User/
Both Contact Phone #
Receptor
Description
and Location
Details **
Latitude/
Longitude **
(decimal degrees)
Private / Public / Semi-Public Casing Depth (ft BGS)
Page 1 of 1
Table B-7: Monitoring and Remediation Well Construction Information
Revision Date: 01/20/2023 Incident Number and Name: Incident No. 14039; Snyders UST ID#: WS-4337
Well ID
Date
Installed
(m/dd/yy)
Date Water
Level
Measured
(m/dd/yy)
Well
Casing
Diameter
(in.)
Well
Casing
Depth (ft.
BGS)
Screened
Interval
(x to y ft.
BGS)
Depth of
Well (ft.
BGS)
Top of
Casing
Elevation*
(ft.)
Depth to
Water from
Top of Casing
(ft.)
Free
Product
Thickness
** (ft.)
Initial
Groundwater
Elevation* (ft.)
Latitude/
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)***
MW-1
****7/14/22 7/14/22 2 20 20 to 35 35 N/A 27.12 0.0 N/A
35.83153 -
80.26496
MW-2
****7/14/22 7/14/22 2 20 20 to 35 35 N/A 33.81 0.0 N/A
35.83130
-80.26478
MW-3 10/13/22 10/13/22 2 20 20 to 35 35 N/A 27.70 0.0 N/A 35.83159
-80.26501
MW-4 10/13/22 10/13/22 2 20 20 to 35 35 N/A 27.19 0.0 N/A
35.83151
-80.26476
MW-5 10/13/22 10/13/22 2 20 20 to 35 35 N/A 28.00 0.0 N/A
35.83135
-80.26507
MW-6 1/19/23 01/19.2023 2 20 20 to 35 35 N/A 24.95 0.0 N/A
35.83124
-80.26514
ft BGS = feet below ground
* Reference Point for Elevation Measurements Sea Level
** If free product is present in a well, groundwater elevation is calculated by: [Top of Casing Elevation - Depth to Water] + [free product thickness x 0.8581]
*** The location must be sufficiently accurate and precise to allow easy recovery of lost or damaged wells.
**** Installed as temporary monitoring wells on July 14, 2022
Page 1 of 1
Table B-9: Groundwater Elevations and Free Product Thickness
Revision Date: 01/20/2023 Incident No. 14039; Snyder's Phillips 66 UST ID#: WS-4337
Well ID #Top of Casing
Elevation (MSL)
Screened Interval
(top of screen, bottom
of screen)
Date Depth to Water*
Uncorrected (feet)
Free Product
Thickness (feet)
Depth to Water*
Corrected
for Free Product
Thickness(feet)
Groundwater Surface
Elevation (MSL)
MW-1 ** NA 20 - 35' 7/14/2022 27.12 0 27.12 NA
MW-2 ** NA 20 - 35' 7/14/2022 33.81 0 33.81 NA
MW-3 NA 20 - 35' 10/14/2022 26.76 0 26.76 NA
MW-4 NA 20 - 35' 10/14/2022 27.01 0 27.01 NA
MW-5 NA 20 - 35' 10/14/2022 27.19 0 27.19 NA
MW-5 NA 20 - 35' 1/19/2023 26.64 0 26.64 NA
MW-6 NA 20 - 35' 1/19/2023 24.95 0 24.95 NA
*Measurement from Top of Casing (Temporary Monitoring Well)
**Installed as temporary groundwater monitoring wells on July 14, 2022

APPENDIX A

HISTORICAL DATA

APPENDIX B

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

Snyder’s Phillips 66
823 West Center Street, Lexington, NC
WS-4337_14039
January 19, 2023

Installation of MW-6 located along the southern property boundary line

Additional view of MW-6 being installed along the southern property boundary line

Location of MW-6 in relation to MW-5 (forefront) with a measured distance of 42 feet

MW-6 completed at grade with 2’ x 2’ concrete pad

APPENDIX C

MONITORING FIELD DATA SHEETS, JOB
HAZARD ANALYSIS, AND HEALTH &
SAFETY PLAN

Appendix C: Groundwater Monitoring Field Data
Completion Date: 01/19/2023 Incident Number and Name: Incident No. 14039; Snyder's Phillips 66 Facility ID No. WS-4337
Well ID
Sampling
Date
(m/dd/yy)
Well
Casing
Diameter
(in.)
Screened
Interval (x to y
ft. BGS)
Depth of
Well (ft. BGS)
Top of
Casing
Elevation
* (ft.)
Depth to
Water from
Top of
Casing (ft.)
Free Product
Thickness**
(ft.)
Groundwater
Elevation* (ft.)Sample Analysis
Number of
Sample
Containers
Proposed
Purged
Volume
(gal)
Actual
Purged
Volume
(gal)
Purge Comments MNA Parameters
MW-1 7/14/2022 2" 25 - 35' 35' N/A 27.12 ND N/A
6200B + 504.1
(EDB) + Metals:
PB & Cr + 602 +
625 + VPH +
EPH + 6200B -
% Oxy
14 N/A N/A
No Bailings due to
limited volume of
groundwater in well.
Sample collection
groundwater clear with
petroleum odor, no
sheen
N/A
MW-2 7/14/2022 2" 25 - 35' 35' N/A 33.81 ND N/A
6200B + 504.1
(EDB) + Metals:
PB & Cr + 602 +
625 + VPH +
EPH + 6200B -
% Oxy
14 N/A N/A
No Bailings due to
limited volume of
groundwater in well.
Sample collection
groundwater clear with
no odor
N/A
MW-3 10/14/2022 2" 20 - 35' 35' N/A 26.76 ND N/A
6200B + 625 +
VPH + EPH 10 N/A N/A
Developed and purged 4-
gallons on 10/13/2022.
Clear to murky brown
with bailer on bottom.
No odor or sheen
N/A
MW-4 10/14/2022 2" 20 - 35' 35' N/A 27.01 ND N/A
6200B + 625 +
VPH + EPH 10 N/A N/A
Developed and purged 4-
gallons on 10/13/2022.
Clear to murky brown
with bailer on bottom.
No odor or sheen
N/A
Snyder's Phillips 66, NCDEQ Incident No.: 14039, Facility ID No.: WS-4337
Appendix C: Groundwater Monitoring Field Data
Completion Date: 01/19/2023 Incident Number and Name: Incident No. 14039; Snyder's Phillips 66 Facility ID No. WS-4337
Well ID
Sampling
Date
(m/dd/yy)
Well
Casing
Diameter
(in.)
Screened
Interval (x to y
ft. BGS)
Depth of
Well (ft. BGS)
Top of
Casing
Elevation
* (ft.)
Depth to
Water from
Top of
Casing (ft.)
Free Product
Thickness**
(ft.)
Groundwater
Elevation* (ft.)Sample Analysis
Number of
Sample
Containers
Proposed
Purged
Volume
(gal)
Actual
Purged
Volume
(gal)
Purge Comments MNA Parameters
MW-5 10/14/2022 2" 20 - 35' 35' N/A 27.19 ND N/A 6200B + 625 +
VPH + EPH 10 N/A N/A
Developed and purged
4.5-gallons on
10/13/2022. Clear to
murky grey with bailer
on bottom. Odor
present. No sheen
N/A
MW-5 1/19/2023 2" 20 - 35' 35' N/A 26.64 ND N/A
6200B + 625 +
VPH + EPH 10 N/A N/A
Purged 4.5-gallon until
bailer on bottom. Clear
to murky brown bailings.
Slight odor present. No
sheen
N/A
MW-6 1/19/2023 2" 20 - 35' 35' N/A 24.95 ND N/A
6200B + 625 +
VPH + EPH 10 N/A N/A
Developed and purged 5-
gallons on 1/19/2023.
Clear to murky brown
bailings with bailer on
bottom. Faint odor
present. No sheen
N/A

1

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND HEALTH AND SAFETY
PLAN

NCDEQ WS-4337/5762_14039/20707 Snyder’s Phillips 66
828 West Center Street, Lexington, Davidson County, NC

CES PROJECT NUMBER: 7919.0522E

Prepared by:

CES GROUP ENGINEERS, LLP
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28273

May 11, 2022

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE 2
1.2 RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY 3
1.3 SUBCONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY 3

2.0 ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY 4
2.1 SITE SAFETY OFFICER 4
2.2 PROJECT MANAGER(S) 5

3.0 BACKGROUND AND HAZARD EVALUATION 7
3.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7
3.2 HAZARD EVALUATION 7
3.3 SAFETY DATA SHEETS (SDS) 8

4.0 AIR MONITORING 9
4.1 MONITORING EQUIPMENT 9
4.2 TYPES AND FREQUENCY OF MONITORING 10
4.2.1 Breathing Zone Monitoring 10
4.2.2 Explosive Gas Source Monitoring 10
4.2.3 Work Area Monitoring 10
4.2.4 Dust Monitoring 10
4.3 ACTION LEVELS 11

5.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES 11
5.1 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION 11
5.2 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 12
5.3 LEVELS OF PROTECTION 13
5.3.1 Modified Level D 13
5.3.2 Level D Protection 13
5.3.3 Level C Protection 14
5.3.4 Level B Protection 14

6.0 SITE CONTROL 15
6.1 REGULATED AREAS 15
6.2 ACCESS/SITE SECURITY 16
6.3 POSTING/BARRICADES 16

ii

Page
7.0 POLICIES 16
7.1 GENERAL WORK PRACTICES 16
7.2 HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION 17
7.3 SANITATION 19

8.0 DECONTAMINATION 19
8.1 PERSONAL DECONTAMINATION 20
8.2 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION 21

9.0 TRAINING 22
9.1 BASIC TRAINING 22
9.2 SITE-SPECIFIC TRAINING 22

10.0 HEALTH MONITORING 23
10.1 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION 23
10.2 HEAT STRESS 23
10.3 COLD STRESS 24
10.4 SELF MONITORING 26

11.0 SITE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES 26
11.1 WORK PRACTICES 26
11.2 COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES 27

12.0 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES 28
12.1 GENERAL 28
12.2 RESPONSIBILITIES 29
12.3 EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST 30
12.4 PERSONNEL INJURY IN THE EXCLUSION ZONE 32
12.5 PERSONNEL INJURY IN THE SUPPORT ZONE 32
12.6 FIRE OR EXPLOSION 32
12.7 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FAILURE 32
12.8 POLLUTANT DISCHARGES/SPILLS 32

APPENDIX A Safety Data Sheet (Benzene - Volatile Organic Compounds)

APPENDIX B Emergency Phone Numbers / Contact List

APPENDIX C Route to Hospital

1

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN (EMP)

NCDEQ WS-4337/5762_14039/20707 Snyder’s Phillips 66
828 West Center Street, Lexington, Davidson County, NC

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Environmental Management and Health and Safety Plan (EMP), additionally referred to
as the ‘plan”, has been developed for CES Group Engineers, LLP (CES), for application to
work completed during Project, NCDEQ WS-4337/5762_14039/20707 Snyder’s Phillips 66,
located at 828 West Center Street, Lexington, Davidson County, North Carolina, under CES
Project Number: 7919.0522E. For the purpose of this plan, the term “project” references
“NCDEQ WS-4337/5762_14039/20707 Snyder’s Phillips 66”. Additionally, this plan should
also be utilized for any work completed at surrounding properties where contamination, or
additional assessment activities, may be located. For the purpose of this plan, the term
“subsurface investigation” will include, but is not limited to, geophysical investigations, drilling
soil borings with conversion to temporary monitoring wells, excavation and removal of
encountered underground storage tanks (USTs), and contaminated soils / groundwater, and
additional assessment and remediation activities, which may include hand-augering of soil
borings, installation of monitoring wells and/or remedial recovery wells, groundwater
monitoring and sampling, and injections. The term “subsurface investigation” may also be
referred to as “excavation” in this plan. The plan addresses health and safety procedures
and information relevant to environmental services being provided by CES personnel, and/or
subcontracted personnel. The health and safety portion of the plan provides procedures to
minimize: (1) the potential for accidents from physical hazards, and (2) the potential for
exposure to chemical contaminants during activities which disturb the subsurface materials
in the event that contamination of soil or groundwater by special wastes is encountered. The
Project Manager, assisted by the assigned Site Safety officer, will ensure that all on-site
subcontractor personnel, and site visitors, comply with the specified health and safety
requirements. At least one copy of this EMP will be maintained at the local office of CES, as
well as one copy will be maintained onsite by CES, and/or subcontracted personnel.

As part of CES’ safety program, a site-specific Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) form will be used,
in conjunction with this plan, which will also include the name, address, and telephone
number of the nearest hospital in relation to the project address where work is being
completed. CES personnel have been instructed to utilize 911 as the first call should an

2

accident, or issue, be apparent that warrants an immediate emergency response action. This
plan is intended for general use during subsurface investigation activities completed by CES
personnel, or CES subconsultants, and as a general reference for workers to review and
understand the potential environmental and health and safety conditions that may be present
under normal subsurface investigation conditions. Additionally, this plan should also be
utilized for any work completed at surrounding properties where subsurface investigation
activities are, or may be required.

Prior to initiating subsurface investigation activities, as those referenced above, CES
personnel (Project Manager(s), Site Safety Officer, and/or Field Crews) will complete Job
Hazard Analysis (JHA) and selected CES safety forms which detail job specifics, including
the sequence of basic job steps, potential incidents or hazards, and recommended
procedures to eliminate potential incidents or hazards.

1.1 PURPOSE / OBJECTIVE
The protection of workers and environmental safety and health are major concerns during
this project and cannot be understated. The objective of the EMP is to document procedures
and precautions to be implemented during the geophysical investigation and installation of
soil borings with conversion to temporary monitoring wells, groundwater monitoring and
sampling, and future site assessment, monitoring and/or remediation activities associated
with said borings, in order to provide for and promote safe working conditions at the site
during field activities, specifically at locations where contamination of soil and groundwater
has been documented and/or is expected to be encountered. The safety organization and
procedures have been established based on a previous analysis of potential hazards at the
site. Personal protection measures have been selected in response to these potential
hazards.

This EMP and HASP has also been developed based upon review of the requirements
described in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Standard Operating Safety
Guide and the U.S. Department of Labor OSHA standards 29 CFR Part 1910. Reasonable
precautions will be taken by the contractor’s representative and its subcontractors to provide
for and promote the safety and health of workers and the general public. Subcontractors will
be given copies and will be required to follow this EMP.

3

1.2 RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY
All site activities which have the potential to expose personnel to site contamination or a
related injury are subject to this EMP. Personnel will be responsible for adherence to the
safety procedures during the performance of the work. In no case may work be performed
in a manner that conflicts with the intent of, or the inherent safety and environmental cautions
expressed in, these procedures. Following due warning(s), personnel who violate safety
procedures will be dismissed from the site, and may be terminated. In the event that
contamination is encountered during regular construction operations, personnel will be
exclusively employed in the affected area of the project site, who have been properly trained
in health and safety regulations associated with handling hazardous materials or special
wastes as specified in the training section (Section 9.0) of this EMP.

The requirements provided herein may be modified as the work progresses to accommodate
changing conditions, but a reduction or increase in the health and safety requirements will
not be made without prior approval by the assigned Site Safety Officer (SSO). The prevention
of adverse health effects and injuries to site workers is totally dependent on the contribution
of all project participants. Open communication among workers, supervisors, and
management concerning safety at the site is an essential element of this EMP.

1.3 SUBCONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY
The Subcontractor is solely responsible for the health, safety, and protection of their own on-
site personnel during the performance of the survey services work scope. The Subcontractor
will perform the work specified in the contract documents in accordance with the HEALTH
AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS specified herein, and federal, OSHA, state, and local health
and safety regulations. It will be the responsibility of the Subcontractor to be familiar with the
required health and safety regulations in the performance of this work. The Subcontractor
will designate a Site Safety officer to implement and monitor activities related to this EMP.

Should any unforeseen or site-specific safety-related factor, hazard, or condition become
evident during the performance of the work, the Subcontractor will take immediate and
prudent action to establish and maintain safe working conditions and to safeguard site
personnel, the public, and the environment.

4

2.0 ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY
All site activities which have the potential to expose CES personnel to site contamination or
related injury are subject to this EMP. As previously discussed, all site personnel are
responsible for adherence to the safety procedures during performance of the work. Specific
oversight responsibilities are assigned to various personnel as discussed in the paragraphs
to follow.

2.1 SITE SAFETY OFFICER
The SSO will be assigned to monitor the daily activities to assure that all health and safety
procedures/policies are being followed by CES personnel. This includes communicating the
specific requirements to all personnel, including subcontractors, implementing the EMP,
conducting site inspections to monitor compliance with EMP as required, providing or
coordinating training as required, coordinating the medical monitoring program, coordinating
respirator fit tests as required, coordinating the acquisition, calibration and maintenance of
air monitoring equipment, respirators and other safety equipment, directing on-site health and
safety activities, and reporting safety related incidents or accidents to the Project Manager.

The SSO for CES is: Greg Hans, PMP
CES Group Engineers, LLP
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.325.5408 (direct)
617.828.9948 (mobile)

It should be noted that the SSO may and will delegate responsibilities to a representative of
CES, subconsultants and/or subcontractors working at the Site and offsite properties for any
and all tasks associated with additional subsurface investigation activities.

2.2 PROJECT MANAGER(S)
The project manager is ultimately responsible for ensuring that all project participants abide
by the requirements set forth in this plan. Any and all changes in the scope of health and
safety requirements or site characterization will be communicated from the Project Manager
and/or Environmental Scientist to the SSO.

5

Environmental Project Manager: Greg Hans, PMP
CES Group Engineers, LLP
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28273
704.325.5408 (direct)
617.828.9948 (mobile)

Environmental Scientist: Dawn Crowell, MELP
CES Group Engineers, LLP
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Charlotte, NC 28273
980.222.0206 (direct)
551.333.4787 (mobile)

3.0 BACKGROUND AND HAZARD EVALUATION

3.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This project involves a geophysical investigation, and the installation of soil borings with
conversion to temporary monitoring wells via mechanical drilling techniques, groundwater
sampling, and potential future assessment, monitoring and remediation of soil and
groundwater contaminants potentially encountered by said borings. Future activities at the
site may include, but are not limited to excavation and removal of encountered underground
storage tanks (USTs), and contaminated soils / groundwater, and additional assessment and
remediation activities, which may include hand-augering of soil borings, installation of
permanent monitoring wells and/or remedial recovery wells, groundwater monitoring, and
injections. During the completion of the aforementioned activities, heavy equipment and
machinery, such as drilling rigs, excavators, back-hoes, dump trucks, etc may be utilized and
present onsite.

3.2 HAZARD EVALUATION
Constant attention will be given to physical hazards encountered during work day activities,
particularly those activities associated near heavy equipment such as drilling, subsurface
excavations, and/or earthmoving equipment. An evaluation of the potential hazards

6

associated with site activities has been completed by reviewing the general construction
scope of work for each of the projects, to be performed by others. The following potential
exposure pathways have been identified:

· Dermal contact, inhalation and ingestion of contaminated soils and
groundwater
· Inhalation and ingestion of contaminated vapors and particles
· Ingestion of waste solids (accidental/poor hygiene)
· Dermal contact with waste solids

Given that subsurface investigation activities may occur in close proximity to ongoing or future
construction (ie, excavations) related activities that may disturb surficial and subsurface soils,
pipes, etc and the physical properties of the contaminants that may be present at these
locations, there is a potential respiratory hazard from contaminants such as petroleum related
compounds, and therefore a contact hazard from petroleum related compounds. A
respiratory hazard from dust and contaminated dust particles may also exist during nearby
drilling, excavation and removal activities.

It is recognized that site hazard evaluation is a dynamic and on-going process that changes
on a daily basis during progression of the work. However, significant deviation from the
prescribed site characterization will necessitate re-evaluation and possible EMP revision.
Communication from the SSO will initiate the re-evaluation process by the Project Manager.

3.3 SAFETY DATA SHEETS (SDS)
Consistent with 29 CFS 1910.1200, (Hazard Communication Standard) applicable Safety
Data Sheets (or equivalent) will be kept on-site, in each vehicle, and with the Project
Manager. All subcontractors must ensure that their employees are informed of their rights
and responsibilities under the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard. Subcontractors will
provide SDS sheets for items which they bring on the site, as applicable. Due to the presence
of VOCs, a SDS for Benzene (prepared by Marathon Petroleum Company, dated 5/14/2015),
as VOC concentrations may be encountered onsite, has been included as Appendix A. It
should be noted that the attached SDS is representative of potential chemicals and materials
that may be encountered in the field during subsurface investigation activities. Should these,
or any other chemicals or hazardous materials, actually be encountered by CES employees
while in the field, the hazards and exposures of these chemicals or hazardous materials will

7

be re-evaluated.

4.0 AIR MONITORING
The purpose of air monitoring during subsurface investigation activities is to identify and
quantify airborne contaminants to determine the level of protection needed. Should air
monitoring for airborne contaminants be necessary, air monitoring with direct reading
instruments will be conducted during all intrusive activities. Four categories of air monitoring
will be conducted as follows:
· Breathing Zone Monitoring
· Explosive Gas Source Monitoring
· Work Area Monitoring
· Dust Monitoring

Equipment to be used in conducting air monitoring activities, along with a description of the
type and frequency of monitoring and associated action levels are discussed in the
paragraphs to follow. It should be noted that the contractors working in active construction
zones, including but not limited to excavations, trenches, bore holes, etc should be
responsible for proper air monitoring of these areas. However, should CES feel the need to
perform additional air monitoring, the following procedures (as outlined in sections 4.0
through 6.0, and to an extent, sections 7.0 through 11.0) may be implemented.

4.1 MONITORING EQUIPMENT
If CES employees are working in, or near, active construction zones where the potential
exists for chemical hazards and exposures to be present, the breathing zones will be
monitored using a MiniRAE portable VOC monitor. These instruments use a photoionization
detector that is designed to measure trace quantities of VOCs with a parts-per-million (ppm)
sensitivity range. It does not detect methane. The survey instrument will be calibrated using
an appropriate standard according to manufacturer’s instructions. The VOC monitor will be
calibrated prior to each use if the instrument is used infrequently, or daily when in constant
use.

If the MiniRAE portable VOC monitor detects elevated levels of VOC concentrations (> 50
ppmv), in ambient air at the site, a Gastech 02 /explosion/H2S meter will be used to measure
oxygen concentrations, explosion potential, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentration. The

8

instrument will be calibrated with methane and H2S according to the manufacturer’s
instructions.

Air monitoring equipment will be certified intrinsically safe and operated by personnel trained
in the use of the specific equipment provided.

4.2 TYPES AND FREQUENCY OF MONITORING
4.2.1 Breathing Zone Monitoring
The breathing zone of a representative employee suspected of greatest exposure for each
job category engaged in work with potentially hazardous substances will be monitored as
follows:

· For excavation operations, monitor the breathing zone of the
equipment operator and laborers with an OVM when the waste
material is initially exposed. The results of the monitoring, the
employee’s name, and the work activity will be recorded in the
daily log

4.2.2 Explosive Gas Source Monitoring
During all operations identified as having a fire/explosion hazard, a combustible gas meter
set to measure the lower explosive level (LEL) will be used to continuously monitor the top of
the trench or excavation.

4.2.3 Work Area Monitoring
Each work area associated with hazardous waste spills and/or contamination will be
monitored at least one time each day with an OVM to determine the concentration of
contaminants being released into the general area.

4.2.4 Dust Monitoring
Chemical exposure via inhalation will be mitigated through the evaluation of wind velocity,
and common sense. Personal protective equipment will be utilized as necessary (based on
specific action levels) to prevent chemical exposure in excess of the exposure limits.

When possible, personnel should be situated upwind of work activity when working at the
site. Excavated areas should be allowed to vent for one to two minutes prior to investigative

9

activities to allow any vapors, dusts, or gases to dissipate. Liquids and solids should never
be smelled to confirm the presence or absence of chemicals.

The SSO or CES representative will screen the site for dusty conditions to prevent inhalation
of chemicals in particulate form (e.g. residue on soil grains). If dusty conditions are observed,
all workers will wear appropriate respiratory protection designed for dusts. Extremely dusty
conditions may require dust suppression via water mist or spray prior to returning to work.

4.3 ACTION LEVELS
The action levels as prescribed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) will be used to initiate protective actions including, but not limited to, use of personal
protective devices, shut down of specific work activities, and site evacuation. A current
volume of the NIOSH Pocket Guide (electronic version) to Chemical hazards will, or may be
utilized as an on-site referenced by the SSO.

5.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES

5.1 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION
During excavation or construction activities in an area where special wastes are expected or
have been encountered, the use of respiratory protection equipment may be required.
Respiratory protection is of primary importance as inhalation is one of the major routes of
exposure to chemical toxicants. Respiratory protective devices include air purifying
respirators, air-line respirators, and self-contained breathing apparatus.

The following respiratory protection practices will be observed by all workers at the Site when
conditions warrant respiratory protection:

· The respiratory protection utilized on-site will be in accordance
with OSHA, 29 CFR 1910.134

· Only properly cleaned, maintained, NIOSH/MSHA-approved,
respirators will be used on-site (if required)

· Selection of respirators, as well as any decisions regarding
upgrading or downgrading of respiratory protection, will be

10

made by the SSO

· Air-purifying cartridges will be replaced on a regular basis (at
least once per day) as determined by the SSO

· No employee will be assigned to tasks requiring the use of
respirators if, based upon the most recent examination, a
physician determines that the employee will be unable to
function normally wearing a respirator or that the safety or
health of the employee or other employees will be
compromised by use of a respirator

· Persons required to wear full-face respirators must not have
beards or moustaches that interfere with proper respirator seal.
All personnel wearing full-face respirators or personnel working
in the exclusion zone will be required to be clean-shaven prior
to each day’s shift. This will be strictly enforced by the SSO

· All personnel required to use APRs must be properly fit tested
prior to engaging in field activities in accordance with OSHA
standards (29 CFR 1910.1025)

5.2 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
To protect workers against dermal contact with contaminants, the following apparel must be
worn during site-specific work activities depending on the level of protection specified for
those activities (Section 5.3 of this EMP):

· Disposable Tyvek coveralls
· PVC-coated or equivalent coveralls for splash protection
· Nitrile gloves or equivalent
· Inner gloves - latex or vinyl
· Outer disposable boots
· Hard hat
· Chemical-resistant boots (Neoprene, PVC, or equivalent)

11

· Hearing protection (as applicable)
· Steel-toed safety shoes
· Goggles or safety glasses will be worn at all times in the work area
· Sleeves taped to gloves and cuffs taped to boots
· Face shield attachments for use with hard hats
· Disposable, chemical-resistant outer boots

Upgrading or downgrading selected protective equipment will be the decision of the SSO
based on assessment of exposure potential during specific tasks.

5.3 LEVELS OF PROTECTION
The levels of protection to be utilized at the site, and the activities to which they apply, are
described in the following paragraphs. The SSO will select the appropriate level of PPE
based on air monitoring results.

5.3.1 Modified Level D
This is the minimum level of protective clothing to be worn at the site during subsurface
investigation activities. All workers, supervisors, and visitors will be required to don the
following clothing prior to entering the project site. Based on the anticipated activities to be
performed at the site, it is anticipated that Modified Level D will provide adequate protection
coverage.

· Work clothes
· Hard hat
· Safety shoes
· Visibility vest
· Work gloves (only as necessary)

5.3.2 Level D Protection
Level D protection includes chemical resistant gloves and will be used for site work whenever
contact with contaminated equipment or materials is possible. The following clothing will be
required for Level D:

· Disposable, chemical-resistant outer boots
· Coveralls (work uniform)
· Hard hat
· Eye protection (safety glasses, goggles, or face-shield)*

12

· Safety shoes
· Nitrile gloves*
* Optional, as determined by SSO

Dust masks shall be used to reduce employee exposure to fugitive dust, an optional Level D
device. The absence of dusty conditions at the site will be justification for the SSO to permit
personnel to remove their masks.

5.3.3 Level C Protection
Level C will be used for site work when the inhalation and dermal contact hazard is elevated.
When conditions for Level C protection are appropriate, the following equipment will be
required:
· Tyvek coveralls/chemical-resistant protective coverall
· Gloves (inner latex gloves and outer nitrile gloves)
· Hard hat
· Safety shoes
· Full-face or half-face air purifying respirator with organic vapor
cartridge (or other proper type cartridge for the intended use,
as determined by the SSO)
· Chemical-resistant outer boots
· Tape gloves and boots to coveralls to prevent leakage
· Hearing protection (as determined by SSO)

5.3.4 Level B Protection
Level B will be used for site work when inhalation and dermal contact hazard are elevated to
the point that a positive pressure, supplied air source is needed.

· Saranex coveralls/chemical-resistant clothing
· Gloves (inner latex gloves and outer nitrile gloves)
· Hard hat
· Self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), or Supplied Air-
Line Respirator (SAR)
· Chemical-resistant safety boots
· Gloves and boots taped to prevent leakage
6.0 SITE CONTROL

13

The purpose of site control is to minimize potential contamination of workers and to protect
the surrounding area from hazards found at the site. If the project site is not secured by
fencing or other suitable site control means and is not routinely patrolled by police or other
independent security personnel; certain procedures must be followed to ensure suitable site
control and limitation of access so that those persons who may be unaware of site conditions
are not exposed to hazards.

All excavations left open and unattended by site personnel will be appropriately barricaded
and visibly posted with “No Trespassing” or other appropriate signage. All heavy machinery
and equipment shall be locked or chained each evening upon completion of daily activities.
All potentially contaminated media, such as soil, will be covered with plastic prior to leaving
the site.

6.1 REGULATED AREAS
As appropriate to the task conducted, the site vicinity will be divided into three zones to allow
control of worker exposures. These zones are described as follows:

· Exclusion Zone. This zone includes the actual area of
contamination and localized work area where specific
investigative and/or construction equipment is operating. This
zone has the highest inhalation exposure potential, and/or
presents a high probability of skin contact with cutaneous
percutaneous - affecting chemicals. New exclusion zones
may exist during certain site-specific activities. This will be
defined by the SSO and access by individuals not necessary
to operation will be limited. (Level D is minimum).

· Contamination Reduction Zone. This zone includes the areas
immediately surrounding the Exclusion Zone. All personnel
and equipment leaving the Exclusion Zone shall be
decontaminated in this zone.

Support Zone. This zone covers all areas outside of the

14

Contamination Reduction Zone. Administrative activities are
conducted in the Support zone, as well as equipment supply
and first aid supply. It is essential that contamination be kept
out of this zone.

6.2 ACCESS/SITE SECURITY
Access to contaminated work areas (Exclusion and Contamination Reduction Zones) will be
regulated and limited to authorized persons. Such persons include the Contractor’s
employees, designated equipment operators, and designated union representatives, as
applicable. The SSO will enforce access limitations during work hours.

6.3 POSTING/BARRICADES
Warning signs will be posted and hung, as applicable, in readily visible locations in or near
contaminated work areas. Barricades or barricade tape will be utilized to prevent access to
various work areas as indicated above.

7.0 POLICIES

7.1 GENERAL WORK PRACTICES
General work practices to be employed on-site are as follows:

· At least one copy of this EMP will be available at the work site

· No food or beverages will be present or consumed in the
exclusion or contamination reduction zones. No tobacco
products will be present or used, and cosmetics will not be
applied in the exclusion or contamination reduction zones

· No matches or lighters are permitted in the exclusion or
contamination reduction zones

· During operations within an area of contamination, all
employees will be required to wash their hands and face before
eating, drinking, smoking, or applying cosmetics
· Field personnel must observe each other for signs of exposure.

15

Indications of adverse effects include, but are not limited to, the
following:
- Changes in complexion and skin
discoloration
- Changes in coordination
- Changes in demeanor
- Excessive salivation and
pupillary response
- Changes in speech pattern

Field personnel will be cautioned to inform the SSO of non-
visible effects of exposure such as the following:

- Headaches
- Dizziness
- Nausea
- Blurred vision
- Cramps
- Irritation of eyes, skin, or respiratory tract
·
7.2 HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION
Extra attention should be paid to the following information regarding work around heavy
equipment (cranes, excavators, front end/backhoe loaders, drilling rigs, etc.).

· Use common sense

· Follow OSHA requirements found in 29 CFR 1910 and 29 CFR
1926

· Wear hard hats, hearing protection, and safety glasses at all
times (when not prohibited by the use of air purifying
respirators). Wear other protective gear as specified in the
Health and Safety Plan

· A closed cab or cage will be required for equipment used at the

16

site

· Pay attention at all times

· Maintain visual contact at all times

· Establish hand signal communication when verbal
communication is difficult. Select one person per work group
to be the one to give hand signals to equipment operators

· Be aware of footing at all times

· Be sure that all heavy equipment has a backup alarm

· Be sure that only qualified people operate heavy equipment

· Use chains, hoists, straps, and other equipment to safely move
heavy materials

· Use proper personal lifting techniques. (Use your legs, not your
back)

· Never walk directly in back of, or to the side of, heavy
equipment without the operator’s knowledge

· Never use a piece of equipment unless you are familiar with its
operation. This applies to heavy as well as light equipment (for
example, chain saws)

· Make sure all precautions have been taken before moving pipe
sections and other materials to be utilized during this project as
they are extremely heavy. Let the equipment, not your body,
do the moving

· Be sure that no underground or overhead power lines, sewer

17

lines, gas lines, or telephone lines will present a hazard in the
work area

7.3 SANITATION
Onsite sanitation facilities (e.g., wash stations, etc.) may be provided for use by field
personnel assigned to the work if work activities involve the direct handling of contaminated
soils and groundwater.

8.0 DECONTAMINATION

The process of removing or neutralizing contaminants that have accumulated on personnel
and equipment is critical to personnel protection. Decontamination protects workers from
hazardous substances that may contaminate and eventually permeate the protective
clothing, respiratory equipment, tools, vehicles, and other equipment used on site.
Decontamination protects site personnel in the following ways: minimizing the transfer of
harmful materials into clean areas; preventing the mixing of incompatible chemicals; and
protecting the community by preventing uncontrolled transportation of contaminants from the
site.

General – Each time an employee enters the Contamination Reduction Zone from the
Exclusion Zone, he/she just make a thorough self-examination. Equipment must be removed
without exposure to the wearer. Hands and face must be scrubbed before eating or use of
tobacco or cosmetic products to avoid accidental ingestion of wastes. Footwear must be
changed prior to leaving the Contamination Reduction Zone to avoid “tracking” of
contaminants outside the area.

Clothing – The Contractor will provide all required protective clothing. Protective clothes will
be left in the change facility. No clothing (including boots) is to be worn or carried away from
the site. Soiled clothing is to be disposed of as appropriate.

Respirators – All required respirators will be provided and maintained by the Contractor and
will be cleaned daily. Cleaning and maintenance will be performed in accordance with the
appropriate OSHA standard (29 CFR 1910.134).

Packaging of Waste Items – All disposable clothing and other contaminated material will be

18

placed in containers for storage on-site. Personnel will make a conscious effort to minimize
the volume of contaminated materials. Legible and understandable precautionary labels will
be affixed prominently to containers of contaminated scrap, waste, debris, and clothing.
Containers will be disposed with other solids in an EPA-approved manner.

8.1 PERSONAL DECONTAMINATION
Minimum measures to be undertaken for decontamination are outlined below. These
measures are to be followed, as applicable, unless the SSO specifies that a higher level of
decontamination is warranted, and accordingly, sets forth upgraded decontamination
procedures.
MINIMUM MEASURES FOR DECONTAMINATION

19

STATION PROCEDURES
1. Equipment Drop 1. Deposit equipment used on site (tools, sampling
devices and containers, monitoring instruments, radios,
clipboards, etc.) on plastic drop cloths or in different
containers with plastic liners. During hot weather
operations, a cool down station may be set up within this
area.
2. Outer Garment, Boots and
Gloves Wash and Rinse
2. Scrub outer boots, outer gloves and fully encapsulating
suit with decon solution or detergent and water. Rinse off
using copious amounts of water.
3. Outer Boot and Glove
Removal
3. Remove outer boots and gloves. Deposit in container
with plastic liner.
4. Tank Change 4. If worker leaves Exclusion Zone to change air tanks,
this is the last step in the decontamination procedure.
Worker’s air tank is exchanged, new outer gloves and boot
covers donned, joints taped, and worker returns to duty.
5. Boot, Gloves and Outer
Garment Removal
5. Boots, fully-encapsulated suit, inner gloves removed
and deposited in separate containers lined with plastic.
6. SCBA Removal 6. SCBA backpack and facepiece is removed (avoid
touching face with fingers). SCBA deposited on plastic
sheets.
7. Field Wash 7. Hands and face are thoroughly washed. Shower as
soon as possible.
EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO PERFORM MINIMUM DECONTAMINATION MEASURES

STATION EQUIPMENT
1 A. Various Size Containers
B. Plastic Liners
C. Plastic Drop Cloths
2 A. Container (20-30 Gallons)
B. Decon. Solution or Detergent Water
C. Rinse Water
D. 2-3 Long-Handled, Soft Bristled Scrub
Brushes
3 A. Container (20-30 Gallons)

20

B. Plastic Liners
C. Bench or Stools
4 A. Air Tanks or Masks and Cartridges,
depending Upon Level.
B. Tape
C. Boot Covers
D. Gloves
5 A. Containers (20-30 Gallons)
B. Plastic Liners
C. Bench or Stools
6 A. Plastic Sheets
B. Basin or Bucket
C. Soap and Towels
D. Bench or Stools

8.2 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION
Any items taken into the Exclusion Zone will be assumed to be contaminated. In general,
vehicles, equipment, and materials brought into the Exclusion Zone will remain in the
Exclusion Zone until no longer necessary to the project.

All contaminated vehicles and equipment will be decontaminated before they are taken off-
site. The Contractor will provide and maintain the following facilities for equipment
decontamination:
- equipment decontamination pad
- contaminated water collection system
- high-pressure water or steam cleaners
- trisodium phosphate detergent
- wire brushes and scrapers

9.0 TRAINING
9.1 BASIC TRAINING
All employees who will perform work at the site must have completed environmental and

21

safety training as approved and/or provided by CES, the Owner, the Contractor, or if required,
by 3rd party General Contractor.

9.2 SITE-SPECIFIC TRAINING
Employees assigned to the site may, as needed, be given site-specific training and field
experience to include the following topics:
- Acute and chronic effects of the toxic chemicals found at the site
- Routes of potential exposure and field activities which could result in such
exposure
- Need for personal protection, types of protection, fit effectiveness and
limitations
- Medical surveillance program
- Work zones established at the site
- Prohibited activities in the Exclusion and Contamination Reduction Zones
- Engineering controls and safe work practices associated with each
employee’s work assignment, including dust control measures
- Personal and equipment decontamination procedures
- Emergency response procedures
- Basic operational safety, emphasizing hazards expected on-site
- Drum handling procedures
- Spill control
- Sampling procedures
- Site communication procedures
10.0 HEALTH MONITORING

10.1 PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
The Contractor may require all of its field workers to pass a pre-employment medical
examination prior to working at the site. The examination shall include a complete medical
and occupational history, and an evaluation from the attending physician as to whether the
employee is qualified to work in areas where exposure to chemicals or physical stress is
possible, and is physically able to use protective equipment, including respirators.

10.2 HEAT STRESS
Subsurface investigation tasks, assignments, projects etc will, or may be conducted during
all four season, winter, spring, summer and fall. Accordingly, warm temperatures during

22

these time periods may put extra physical stress on the body. Long periods of exposure to
heat may cause illness, particularly if the employee is not accustomed to working in hot areas.
Also, heat builds up inside protective clothing, so there is a risk of heat stress even if outside
temperatures are moderate.

The signs, symptoms and treatment of heat stress are outlined below. All individuals
participating in work in the Exclusion Zone and Contamination Reduction Zones should be
monitored regularly for heat stress symptoms.

Heat Cramps

Symptoms: painful muscle spasms

Cause: profuse sweating and drinking large amounts of water

Treatment: provide liquids with electrolytes (sodium, potassium) like diluted
Gatorade

23

Heat Exhaustion

Symptoms: weakness, fatigue, dizziness; pale, cool, moist skin; heavy sweating;
Headache; nausea; and fainting

Cause: reduced blood volume resulting from dehydration from profuse
sweating and insufficient replacement of water and salts

Treatment: If worker is conscious, rest in cool place; replace water and electrolytes
lost in sweat; if unconscious, get medical help immediately. DO NOT
give liquids if person is unconscious
Heat Stroke

Symptoms: very dry, hot skin with red mottled or bluish appearance; confusion;
Convulsions; unconsciousness; rapidly rising temperature

Cause: body becomes overheated because the worker does not sweat.
Can be fatal.

Treatment: call for medical help immediately; move person to cool place;
remove PPE; use wet towels or water and fan to cool while waiting
for help.

10.4 COLD STRESS
Subsurface investigation tasks, assignments, projects etc will, or may be conducted during
all four season, winter, spring, summer and fall. Accordingly, cold temperatures during these
time periods may put extra physical stress on the body. Long periods of exposure to cold
may cause illness, particularly if the employee is not accustomed to working in cold areas.
Cold stress occurs by driving down the body’s skin temperature and eventually the body
temperature (core temperature).

The signs, symptoms and treatment of cold stress are outlined below. All individuals
participating in work in the Exclusion Zone and Contamination Reduction Zones should be
monitored regularly for cold stress symptoms.

24

Hypothermia:

Symptoms: shivering, reduced circulation, slow/weak pulse, slowed breathing, lack
of coordination, irritability, confusion, sleepy behavior
Cause: body heat is lost faster than it can be replaced and normal body
temperature drops below 95 degrees F

Treatment: move person to warm and dry area, remove wet clothes and replace
with dry clothes, layer with blankets, give warm sweetened liquids, if
unconscious, get medical help immediately. DO NOT give liquids if
person is unconscious

Frostbite

Symptoms: reddened skin, with development of gray/white patches, numbness,
firm or hard parts affected, blisters
Cause: freezing of skin and underlying tissues typically affecting extremities,
particularly the feet and hands

Treatment: move person to warm and dry area, remove wet clothes and replace
with dry clothes, layer with blankets, give warm sweetened liquids, if
unconscious, get medical help immediately. DO NOT give liquids if
person is unconscious. DO NOT rub affected area, DO NOT break
blisters, DO NOT try to directly warm the frostbite areas without
medical attention

Trench Foot

Symptoms: redness of skin, swelling, numbness, blisters

Cause: prolonged exposure to wet and cold temperatures, constantly wet and
cold feet, wet and cold feet lose heat 25x faster than dry feet

Treatment: call for medical help immediately; remove the shoes, boots, wet
socks, dry the feet

25

10.5 SELF MONITORING
While at the site, CES employees and sub-contractors will be required to monitor their own
health and that of their co-workers. Visual observations include:

- behavioral changes
- change in appetite
- coordination losses
- gum and lip discoloration
- increased salivation
- pupil dilation
- sensation losses
- skin rashes
- slurred speech

Any abnormalities or changes are to be reported to the physician and investigated
immediately. Such aspects could be symptoms of toxic exposure and must not be allowed to
persist without medical attention. In addition, all accidents and injuries, no matter how small,
are to be reported to the SSO and investigated.

11.0 SITE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

11.1 WORK PRACTICES
The need to exercise caution in the performance of specific work tasks is made more acute
due to weather conditions, restricted mobility, and reduced peripheral vision caused by the
protective gear itself, the need to maintain the integrity of the protective gear, and the
increased difficulty in communicating caused by respirators. Work at the site will be
conducted according to established procedures and guidelines for the safety and health of
all involved. Among the most important of these principles for working at the site are:

- In any unknown situation, always assume the worst conditions and plan
accordingly

- Establish and maintain communication

26

- Minimize contact with excavated or contaminated materials. Plan work
work areas, decontamination areas, and procedures to accomplish this.
Do not place equipment on drums or on the ground. Do not sit or stand
on drums or other materials

- Employ disposable items when possible to minimize risks during
decontamination and possible cross-contamination during
sampling/handling.
This will require a common-sense approach to potential risks and costs

- Smoking, eating, or drinking after entering the work zone and before
decontamination will not be allowed. Oral ingestion of contaminants from
your hands are a likely means of introduction of the toxic substances into the
body

- Avoid heat and other work stresses relating to wearing the protective gear.
Work breaks and proper tracking are planned to prevent stress-related
accidents or fatigue

- Maintain monitoring systems. Conditions can change quickly if sub-surface
areas of contamination are penetrated

- Be observant of not only your own immediate surroundings but also that of
others. It is a team effort to notice and warn of impending dangerous
situations. Extra precautions are necessary when working near heavy
equipment while utilizing personal protective gear, as vision, hearing, and
communication may be restricted by the protective gear

- Be aware that chemical contaminants may aggravate or worsen symptoms
of other illnesses or intoxication. Avoid use of alcohol and working when ill

11.2 COMMUNICATION PROCEDURES
Personnel in the Exclusion Zone shall remain within sight of other project personnel, and
should work in conjunction with another individual. Since it is not anticipated that the project
area will encompass a large area at any given time, radio communication will not be required.

27

The following standard hand signals will be used in the event that communication is required
amongst workers in and/or between the Exclusion Zone and Contamination Reduction Zone.

Hand gripping throat Out of air, cannot breathe

Grip partner’s wrist, or both Leave area immediately
Hands around partner’s waist

Rotating hands above the head Need assistance

Right hand thumb up OK, I’m all right, I understand

Right hand thumb down No, negative

12.0 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES

12.1 GENERAL
A comprehensive emergency response plan has been developed to handle all on-site
emergencies. A list of site conditions which might require implementation of the plan includes
but is not limited to:

- Fire or explosion on-site
- Serious employee injury
- Accumulation of combustible gases or vapors at concentrations greater than
background
- Oxygen concentration below 19.5%
- Unsafe working conditions, such as inclement weather or hazardous material
releases
- Major release of toxic materials for which appropriate PPE is not being worn
by workers

28

12.2 RESPONSIBILITIES
The emergency coordinator is the SSO (Greg Hans) or assigned CES representative working
onsite; the alternate or back-up is the Environmental Scientist (Dawn Crowell). The
emergency coordinator is responsible for:

- Assessing the situation and determining whether an emergency exists which
requires activating the plan
- Directing all efforts in the area, including evacuating personnel and minimizing
property loss
- Ensuring that outside emergency services such as fire departments, police,
ambulance, and hospitals are notified when necessary
- Directing the shut-down of site operations when necessary
- Notifying regulatory agencies as necessary

29

12.3 EMERGENCY CONTACT LIST

Emergency Contact Phone Number
Environmental PM: Greg Hans, PMP 617.828.9948 (M)
CES Group Engineers, LLP 704.325.5408 (D)

SSO (if assigned by Dawn Crowell, CES Group Engineers
And/or
by Env PM) Carolina Soil Investigations 704.539.5279
(Assigned CSI field crew chief)

Back-up PM Dawn Crowell 551.333.4787 (M)
CES Group Engineers, LLP 980.222.0206 (D)

Police: North Carolina Highway Patrol 911
Lexington Police Department 336.243.3302

Hospital: Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist | Lexington Medical Center
336.248.5161
250 Hospital Drive
Lexington, NC 27292

Fire: City of Lexington Fire Department Station 336.248.3935

Doctor: Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist | Lexington Medical Center
336.248.5161

Ambulance 911

NCDENR (Winston-Salem Region) 336.776.9800

Directions to the nearest hospital: Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist | Lexington
Medical Center, 250 Hospital Drive, Lexington, NC 27292.

Refer to Appendix C.

30

12.4 PERSONNEL INJURY IN THE EXCLUSION ZONE
When there is an injury in the Exclusion Zone, a continuous horn blast will be sounded as an
emergency signal (as applicable). Upon the sounding of the emergency signal, all site
personnel shall assemble in the personnel decontamination area. Rescue personnel will
enter the Exclusion Zone (if required) to remove the injured person. The SSO, or CES
representative, will evaluate the nature of the injury and call for an ambulance (if needed),
and the affected person will be decontaminated to the extent possible prior to movement to
the Support Zone. The appropriate first aid will be administered. No persons shall re-enter
the Exclusion Zone until the cause of the injury or symptom is determined.

12.5 PERSONAL INJURY IN THE SUPPORT ZONE
Upon notification of an injury in the Support Zone, the SSO, or CES representative, will
assess the nature of the injury. If the injury or absence of the injured person does not affect
the performance of site personnel, operations may continue while appropriate first aid and
follow-up is initiated. If the injury increases the risk to others, the designated emergency
signal (continuous horn blast) shall be sounded, and all site personnel shall move to the
decontamination line for further instructions. Activities on-site will stop until the added risk is
removed or minimized.

12.6 FIRE OR EXPLOSION
Upon notification of a fire or explosion on-site, a continuous horn blast will be sounded, and
all site personnel will assemble at the decontamination area. The fire department must be
alerted and all personnel moved as soon as possible to a safe distance.

12.7 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FAILURE
If any site worker experiences a failure or alteration of protective equipment which may alter
the protection factor, that person and his/her work partner must immediately leave the
Exclusion Zone. Re-entry shall not be permitted until the equipment has been appropriately
repaired or replaced.

12.8 POLLUTANT DISCHARGES/SPILLS
In the event of an unauthorized discharge of pollutants or contaminants into the soil, sewers, or
ambient air, the person first finding such an incident should immediately notify the Project
Manager and/or the SSO. The Project Manager and/or SSO will immediately notify Greg Hans
or Dawn Crowell and the Local Fire / Emergency Management agency (Davidson County
Emergency Services at 336.242.2270).

APPENDIX D

SOIL AND GROUNDWATER WELL
LABORATORY REPORTS AND CHAIN-
OF-CUSTODY RECORDS

Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.

2/1/2023
CES Group Greg Hans
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150 Charlotte, NC, 28273
Ref: Analytical Testing
Lab Report Number: 23-020-0001 Client Project Description: Snyders Phillips 66
Dear Greg Hans:
Waypoint Analytical, LLC (Charlotte) received sample(s) on 1/20/2023 for the analyses presented in the
following report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in accordance with the applicable analytical method.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all parameters were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA (including 40 CFR 136
Method Update Rule May 2021) unless otherwise indicated. Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as-received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report. Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely,
Angela D Overcash Senior Project Manager
Page 1 of 68
Certification Summary
Laboratory ID: WP CNC: Waypoint Analytical Carolina, Inc. (C), Charlotte, NC
State Program Lab ID Expiration Date
07/31/202337735State ProgramNorth Carolina
12/31/2023402State ProgramNorth Carolina
07/31/202399012State ProgramSouth Carolina
12/31/202299012State ProgramSouth Carolina
Page 1 of 1 00016/23-020-0001
Page 2 of 68
Report Number:
Sample Summary Table
Client Project Description:
23-020-0001
Snyders Phillips 66
Lab No Client Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received
01/19/2023 10:00Aqueous 97928 MW-5 01/20/2023 08:26
01/19/2023 10:45Solids 97929 MW-6 01/20/2023 08:26
01/19/2023 14:20Aqueous 97930 MW-6 01/20/2023 08:26
Page 3 of 68
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
23-020-0001
Report Limit
Project:Snyders Phillips 66
V 97928MW-5
J291001/30/2023 18:576200BAcetoneµg/L 1800
11500 01/30/2023 18:576200BBenzeneµg/L 180
13.3 01/28/2023 08:556200Bsec-Butyl benzene µg/L 2.00
77.0 01/28/2023 08:556200BChloroformµg/L 2.20
1590 01/30/2023 18:576200BDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)µg/L 500
4920 01/30/2023 18:576200BEthylbenzeneµg/L 170
J94301/30/2023 18:576200B2-Hexanone µg/L 380
137 01/28/2023 08:556200BIsopropylbenzeneµg/L 1.80
968 01/28/2023 08:556200BMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/L 7.10
30700 01/30/2023 18:576200BMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)µg/L 140
397 01/28/2023 08:556200B4-Methyl-2-Pentanone µg/L 0.780
817 01/28/2023 08:556200BNaphthaleneµg/L 4.70
343 01/28/2023 08:556200Bn-Propylbenzene µg/L 1.90
70.3 01/28/2023 08:556200BStyreneµg/L 2.20
62300 01/30/2023 18:576200BTolueneµg/L 220
3200 01/30/2023 18:576200B1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/L 190
750 01/28/2023 08:556200B1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/L 1.80
8480 01/30/2023 18:576200Bo-Xylene µg/L 210
17200 01/30/2023 18:576200Bm,p-Xylene µg/L 420
25700 01/30/2023 18:576200BXylene (Total)µg/L 210
43.3 01/25/2023 18:24625.1 1-Methylnaphthalene µg/L 1.15
84.8 01/25/2023 18:24625.1 2-Methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.672
394 01/26/2023 11:27625.1 Naphthalene µg/L 2.94
1290 01/26/2023 15:04MADEP-EPH Aromatic C11-C22 µg/L 63.6
99700 01/24/2023 16:52MADEP-VPH Aliphatic C5-C8 µg/L 1150
51500 01/24/2023 16:52MADEP-VPH Aliphatic C9-C12 µg/L 2580
7390 01/24/2023 16:52MADEP-VPH Aromatic C9-C10 µg/L 402
V 97929MW-6
J0.026 01/23/2023 11:538260DAcetonemg/Kg - dry 0.003
0.037 01/23/2023 11:538260DBenzenemg/Kg - dry 0.0008
0.040 01/23/2023 11:538260DDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)mg/Kg - dry 0.001
0.026 01/23/2023 11:538260DEthylbenzenemg/Kg - dry 0.0008
J0.012 01/23/2023 11:538260D2-Hexanone mg/Kg - dry 0.0008
J0.001 01/23/2023 11:538260DIsopropylbenzenemg/Kg - dry 0.0006
J0.011 01/23/2023 11:538260DMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)mg/Kg - dry 0.0009
0.598 01/23/2023 17:198260DMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)mg/Kg - dry 0.020
Page 4 of 68
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
23-020-0001
Report Limit
Project:Snyders Phillips 66
V 97929MW-6
0.014 01/23/2023 11:538260DNaphthalenemg/Kg - dry 0.001
J0.003 01/23/2023 11:538260Dn-Propylbenzene mg/Kg - dry 0.0007
0.071 01/23/2023 11:538260DToluenemg/Kg - dry 0.0009
0.028 01/23/2023 11:538260D1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg - dry 0.0007
J0.003 01/23/2023 11:538260D1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg - dry 0.0007
0.038 01/23/2023 11:538260Do-Xylene mg/Kg - dry 0.0007
0.089 01/23/2023 11:538260Dm,p-Xylene mg/Kg - dry 0.001
0.128 01/23/2023 11:538260DXylene (Total)mg/Kg - dry 0.0007
25.5 01/23/2023 10:00SW-DRYWT Moisture %
V 97930MW-6
307 01/28/2023 08:276200BBenzeneµg/L 1.80
232 01/28/2023 08:276200BDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)µg/L 5.00
265 01/28/2023 08:276200BEthylbenzeneµg/L 1.70
17.4 01/28/2023 08:276200BIsopropylbenzeneµg/L 1.80
2270 01/30/2023 17:356200BMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)µg/L 14.0
70.9 01/28/2023 08:276200BNaphthaleneµg/L 4.70
45.7 01/28/2023 08:276200Bn-Propylbenzene µg/L 1.90
373 01/28/2023 08:276200BTolueneµg/L 2.20
274 01/28/2023 08:276200B1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/L 1.90
19.8 01/28/2023 08:276200B1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/L 1.80
248 01/28/2023 08:276200Bo-Xylene µg/L 2.10
932 01/28/2023 08:276200Bm,p-Xylene µg/L 4.20
1180 01/28/2023 08:276200BXylene (Total)µg/L 2.10
8.73 01/25/2023 19:09625.1 1-Methylnaphthalene µg/L 1.17
12.6 01/25/2023 19:09625.1 2-Methylnaphthalene µg/L 0.682
31.5 01/25/2023 19:09625.1 Naphthalene µg/L 0.746
J90.1 01/26/2023 15:40MADEP-EPH Aliphatic C9-C18 µg/L 28.8
285 01/26/2023 15:40MADEP-EPH Aromatic C11-C22 µg/L 62.4
1650 01/25/2023 09:17MADEP-VPH Aliphatic C5-C8 µg/L 115
3450 01/25/2023 09:17MADEP-VPH Aliphatic C9-C12 µg/L 258
786 01/25/2023 09:17MADEP-VPH Aromatic C9-C10 µg/L 40.2
Page 5 of 68

Client: CES Group CASE NARRATIVE
Project: Snyders Phillips 66 Lab Report Number: 23-020-0001
Date: 2/1/2023
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS Method 625.1 Analyte: Benzidine QC Batch No: V29180/V29238
Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits.
Analyte: Benzidine QC Batch No: V29239/V29238
Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits. Massachusetts EPH Method MADEP-EPH Sample 97928 (MW-5)
Analyte: 2-Bromonaphthalene QC Batch No: V29194/V29150
High frac surrogate
Sample 97928 (MW-5) Analyte: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
QC Batch No: V29194/V29150 High frac surrogate
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS Method 6200B Analyte: Bromomethane QC Batch No: V29286/V29358
Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits.
Analyte: Bromomethane QC Batch No: V29360/V29358
Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits. Analyte: Ethanol QC Batch No: V29286/V29358
Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits.
Analyte: Ethanol QC Batch No: V29360/V29358 Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits. Analyte: Vinyl chloride QC Batch No: V29286/V29358
Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits. Analyte: Vinyl chloride QC Batch No: V29360/V29358 Relative Percent Difference (RPD) for the duplicate analysis was outside of the allowable QC limits.
Page 6 of 68

Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS Method 8260D
Analyte: Bromomethane QC Batch No: V29103/V29102
CCV result is above control limits but within method parameters. Results are reported but considered estimated.

Page 7 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-5
97928 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V29358 01/27/23 06:00 V29363 01/30/23 06:00
2910 J µg/L 1800 10000Acetone 1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364ANG
11500 µg/L 180 500Benzene 1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364ANG
<2.10 µg/L 2.10 5.00Bromobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<4.20 µg/L 4.20 10.0Bromochloromethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.60 µg/L 1.60 5.00Bromodichloromethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<15.0 µg/L 15.0 50.0Bromoform 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.80 µg/L 2.80 10.0Bromomethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 5.00n-Butylbenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
13.3 µg/L 2.00 5.00
sec-Butyl benzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<9.20 µg/L 9.20 20.0tert-Butyl benzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 5.00Carbon Tetrachloride 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.90 µg/L 1.90 5.00Chlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.90 µg/L 1.90 5.00Chlorodibromomethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<4.30 µg/L 4.30 10.0Chloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
77.0 µg/L 2.20 5.00Chloroform 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.20 µg/L 2.20 5.00
Chloromethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.002-Chlorotoluene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.004-Chlorotoluene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
1590 µg/L 500 500Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364ANG
<11.0 µg/L 11.0 20.01,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,2-Dibromoethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.30 µg/L 2.30 5.00Dibromomethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 8 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-5
97928 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V29358 01/27/23 06:00 V29363 01/30/23 06:00
<2.20 µg/L 2.20 5.001,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.90 µg/L 1.90 5.001,3-Dichlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.10 µg/L 2.10 5.001,4-Dichlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<12.0 µg/L 12.0 50.0Dichlorodifluoromethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.40 µg/L 2.40 5.001,1-Dichloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.001,2-Dichloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.001,1-Dichloroethene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.00cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 5.00
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.90 µg/L 1.90 5.001,2-Dichloropropane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.30 µg/L 1.30 5.001,3-Dichloropropane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.10 µg/L 2.10 20.02,2-Dichloropropane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,1-Dichloropropene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.10 µg/L 2.10 5.00cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.00trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<420 µg/L 420 2000
Ethanol 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
4920 µg/L 170 500Ethylbenzene 1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364ANG
<3.50 µg/L 3.50 30.0Hexachlorobutadiene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
943 J µg/L 380 10002-Hexanone 1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364ANG
137 µg/L 1.80 5.00Isopropylbenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<0.890 µg/L 0.890 5.004-Isopropyl toluene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
968 µg/L 7.10 50.0Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 9 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-5
97928 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V29358 01/27/23 06:00 V29363 01/30/23 06:00
30700 µg/L 140 1000Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364ANG
397 µg/L 0.780 10.04-Methyl-2-Pentanone 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<3.30 µg/L 3.30 20.0Methylene Chloride 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
817 µg/L 4.70 10.0Naphthalene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
343 µg/L 1.90 5.00n-Propylbenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
70.3 µg/L 2.20 5.00Styrene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.60 µg/L 1.60 5.001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.60 µg/L 1.60 5.001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.20 µg/L 2.20 5.00
Tetrachloroethene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
62300 µg/L 220 500Toluene 1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364ANG
<3.80 µg/L 3.80 5.001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<3.10 µg/L 3.10 5.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.60 µg/L 1.60 5.001,1,1-Trichloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<0.960 µg/L 0.960 5.001,1,2-Trichloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 5.00Trichloroethene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 5.00
Trichlorofluoromethane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<2.70 µg/L 2.70 5.001,2,3-Trichloropropane 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
3200 µg/L 190 5001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364ANG
750 µg/L 1.80 5.001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<10.0 µg/L 10.0 50.0Vinyl Acetate 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
<1.70 µg/L 1.70 5.00Vinyl Chloride 10 01/28/23 08:55 V29360ANG
8480 µg/L 210 500o-Xylene 1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364ANG
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 10 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-5
97928 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V29358 01/27/23 06:00 V29363 01/30/23 06:00
17200 µg/L 420 1000m,p-Xylene 1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364ANG
25700 µg/L 210 500Xylene (Total)1000 01/30/23 18:57 V29364
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.6 Limits: 70-130%01/28/23 08:5510 ANG V29360
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 108 Limits: 70-130%01/28/23 08:5510 ANG V29360
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 103 Limits: 70-130%01/28/23 08:5510 ANG V29360
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.0 Limits: 70-130%01/28/23 08:5510 ANG V29360
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 Limits: 70-130%01/30/23 18:571000 ANG V29364
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 107 Limits: 70-130%01/30/23 18:571000 ANG V29364
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 103 Limits: 70-130%01/30/23 18:571000 ANG V29364
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 100 Limits: 70-130%01/30/23 18:571000 ANG V29364
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V29238 01/25/23 08:52
<0.305 µg/L 0.305 2.02Acenaphthene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.299 µg/L 0.299 2.02Acenaphthylene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.844 µg/L 0.844 2.02Anthracene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.33 µg/L 1.33 10.1
Benzidine 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.643 µg/L 0.643 2.02Benzo(a)anthracene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.03 µg/L 1.03 2.02Benzo(a)pyrene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<2.51 µg/L 2.51 5.05Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.02 µg/L 1.02 5.05Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 11 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-5
97928 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V29238 01/25/23 08:52
<2.01 µg/L 2.01 5.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 10.1Benzoic Acid 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.690 µg/L 0.690 5.05Benzyl alcohol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.472 µg/L 0.472 5.05Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.05 µg/L 1.05 5.05Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.09 µg/L 1.09 5.05Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<24.3 µg/L 24.3 50.5Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.12 µg/L 1.12 5.054-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.85 µg/L 1.85 5.05
Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.19 µg/L 1.19 5.054-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<7.45 µg/L 7.45 20.22-Chloronaphthalene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.947 µg/L 0.947 10.12-Chlorophenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.73 µg/L 1.73 5.054-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.409 µg/L 0.409 2.02Chrysene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.438 µg/L 0.438 2.02Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.864 µg/L 0.864 5.05
Dibenzofuran 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<2.02 µg/L 2.02 5.051,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<2.02 µg/L 2.02 5.051,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<2.07 µg/L 2.07 5.051,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.91 µg/L 1.91 5.053,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.47 µg/L 1.47 10.12,4-Dichlorophenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.752 µg/L 0.752 5.05Diethyl phthalate 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 12 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-5
97928 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V29238 01/25/23 08:52
<0.948 µg/L 0.948 5.05Dimethyl phthalate 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.59 µg/L 1.59 20.22,4-Dimethylphenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<2.08 µg/L 2.08 5.05Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<2.09 µg/L 2.09 10.14,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.94 µg/L 1.94 10.12,4-Dinitrophenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.12 µg/L 1.12 5.052,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.817 µg/L 0.817 5.052,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.67 µg/L 1.67 5.05Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.252 µg/L 0.252 2.02
Fluoranthene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.815 µg/L 0.815 2.02Fluorene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.988 µg/L 0.988 5.05Hexachlorobenzene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<2.76 µg/L 2.76 5.05Hexachlorobutadiene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<2.07 µg/L 2.07 5.05Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.78 µg/L 1.78 5.05Hexachloroethane 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.481 µg/L 0.481 2.02Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.448 µg/L 0.448 5.05
Isophorone 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
43.3 µg/L 1.15 2.021-Methylnaphthalene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
84.8 µg/L 0.672 2.022-Methylnaphthalene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
394 µg/L 2.94 8.08Naphthalene 4 01/26/23 11:27 V29239JMV
<0.914 µg/L 0.914 5.05Nitrobenzene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.497 µg/L 0.497 5.052-Nitrophenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.24 µg/L 1.24 10.14-Nitrophenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 13 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-5
97928 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V29238 01/25/23 08:52
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.05N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.647 µg/L 0.647 5.05N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.44 µg/L 1.44 5.05Pentachlorophenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.432 µg/L 0.432 2.02Phenanthrene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.657 µg/L 0.657 5.05Phenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<0.438 µg/L 0.438 2.02Pyrene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<2.23 µg/L 2.23 5.051,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
<1.33 µg/L 1.33 5.052,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 01/25/23 18:24 V29239JMV
625.1Surrogate: Phenol-d5 33.8 Limits: 10-63%01/25/23 18:241 JMV
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 63.2 Limits: 49-118%01/25/23 18:241 JMV V29239
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 33.9 Limits: 22-84%01/25/23 18:241 JMV V29239
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 64.2 Limits: 43-123%01/25/23 18:241 JMV V29239
Surrogate: 4-Terphenyl-d14 75.2 Limits: 49-151%01/25/23 18:241 JMV V29239
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 64.6 Limits: 31-144%01/25/23 18:241 JMV V29239
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 14 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-5
97928 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:00
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
MAEPH (Prep)
MADEP-EPH Prep Batch(es):V29150 01/25/23 10:23
<29.4 µg/L 29.4 365Aliphatic C9-C18 1 01/26/23 15:04 V29194AMP
<129 µg/L 129 521Aliphatic C19-C36 1 01/26/23 15:04 V29194AMP
1290 µg/L 63.6 260Aromatic C11-C22 1 01/26/23 15:04 V29194AMP
MADEP-EPHSurrogate: 2-Bromonaphthalene 147 *Limits: 40-140%01/26/23 15:041 AMP
MADEP-EPHSurrogate: Chlorooctadecane 67.8 Limits: 40-140%01/26/23 15:041 AMP
MADEP-EPHSurrogate: OTP Surrogate 91.8 Limits: 40-140%01/26/23 15:041 AMP
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 147 *Limits: 40-140%01/26/23 15:041 AMP V29194
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
MAVPH (Prep)
MADEP-VPH Prep Batch(es):V29104 01/24/23 08:00
99700 µg/L 1150 5000
Aliphatic C5-C8 100 01/24/23 16:52 V29105TBL
51500 µg/L 2580 5000Aliphatic C9-C12 100 01/24/23 16:52 V29105TBL
7390 µg/L 402 5000Aromatic C9-C10 100 01/24/23 16:52 V29105TBL
MADEP-VPHSurrogate: 2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)85.2 Limits: 70-130%01/24/23 16:52100 TBL
MADEP-VPHSurrogate: 2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)77.2 Limits: 70-130%01/24/23 16:52100 TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 15 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97929 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:45
Solids
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Method
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
25.5 %Moisture 1 01/23/23 10:00 SW-DRYWTAMB
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 16 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97929 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:45
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035
8260D Prep Batch(es):V29102 01/23/23 08:00 V29138 01/23/23 08:00
0.026 J mg/Kg - dry 0.003 0.026Acetone 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.026Acrolein 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.026Acrylonitrile 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.037 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Benzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006Bromobenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Bromochloromethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Bromodichloromethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Bromoform 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.002 mg/Kg - dry 0.002 0.013
Bromomethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006n-Butylbenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006sec-Butyl benzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006tert-Butyl benzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.006Carbon Disulfide 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.002 mg/Kg - dry 0.002 0.006Carbon Tetrachloride 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.006Chlorobenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006
Chlorodibromomethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.013Chloroethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Chloroform 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.013Chloromethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0062-Chlorotoluene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0005 mg/Kg - dry 0.0005 0.0064-Chlorotoluene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.040 mg/Kg - dry 0.0010 0.006Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 17 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97929 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:45
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035
8260D Prep Batch(es):V29102 01/23/23 08:00 V29138 01/23/23 08:00
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0131,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.0061,2-Dibromoethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Dibromomethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0004 mg/Kg - dry 0.0004 0.0061,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0005 mg/Kg - dry 0.0005 0.0061,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.0061,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.013Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0061,1-Dichloroethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0010 mg/Kg - dry 0.0010 0.0061,1-Dichloroethene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0061,2-Dichloropropane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0061,3-Dichloropropane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0062,2-Dichloropropane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006
1,1-Dichloropropene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.026 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Ethylbenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.067Ethyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (ETBE)1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.013Hexachlorobutadiene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.013n-Hexane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 18 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97929 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:45
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035
8260D Prep Batch(es):V29102 01/23/23 08:00 V29138 01/23/23 08:00
0.012 J mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.0262-Hexanone 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.001 J mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006Isopropylbenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0064-Isopropyl toluene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.011 J mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.026Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.598 mg/Kg - dry 0.020 0.167Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)50 01/23/23 17:19 V29139TBL
<0.020 mg/Kg - dry 0.020 0.0264-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.013Methylene Chloride 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.014 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.013Naphthalene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.003 J
mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006
n-Propylbenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Styrene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0061,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0004 mg/Kg - dry 0.0004 0.0061,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Tetrachloroethene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.071 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.006Toluene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0131,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.013
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0061,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0061,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Trichloroethene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.002 mg/Kg - dry 0.002 0.013Trichlorofluoromethane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0010 mg/Kg - dry 0.0010 0.0061,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.028 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0061,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 19 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97929 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:45
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035
8260D Prep Batch(es):V29102 01/23/23 08:00 V29138 01/23/23 08:00
0.003 J mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0061,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.013Vinyl Acetate 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.013Vinyl Chloride 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.038 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006o-Xylene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.089 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.013m,p-Xylene 1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103TBL
0.128 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006Xylene (Total)1 01/23/23 11:53 V29103
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 103 Limits: 70-130%01/23/23 11:531 TBL V29103
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 107 Limits: 84-123%01/23/23 11:531 TBL V29103
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 98.9 Limits: 76-129%01/23/23 11:531 TBL V29103
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 Limits: 70-130%01/23/23 17:1950 TBL V29139
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 103 Limits: 70-130%01/23/23 17:1950 TBL V29139
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.1 Limits: 76-129%01/23/23 17:1950 TBL V29139
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 20 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97929 Matrix:
1/19/2023 10:45
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
MAVPH (Prep)
MADEP-VPH Prep Batch(es):V29085 01/23/23 08:00
<1.66 mg/Kg - dry 1.66 11.0Aliphatic C5-C8 100 01/23/23 10:43 V29086TBL
<6.26 mg/Kg - dry 6.26 11.0Aliphatic C9-C12 100 01/23/23 10:43 V29086TBL
<0.856 mg/Kg - dry 0.856 11.0Aromatic C9-C10 100 01/23/23 10:43 V29086TBL
MADEP-VPHSurrogate: 2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)80.1 Limits: 70-130%01/23/23 10:43100 TBL
MADEP-VPHSurrogate: 2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)80.4 Limits: 70-130%01/23/23 10:43100 TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 21 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97930 Matrix:
1/19/2023 14:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V29285 01/27/23 14:00 V29337 01/30/23 09:00
<18.0 µg/L 18.0 100Acetone 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
307 µg/L 1.80 5.00Benzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.10 µg/L 2.10 5.00Bromobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<4.20 µg/L 4.20 10.0Bromochloromethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.60 µg/L 1.60 5.00Bromodichloromethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<15.0 µg/L 15.0 50.0Bromoform 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.80 µg/L 2.80 10.0Bromomethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 5.00n-Butylbenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.00
sec-Butyl benzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<9.20 µg/L 9.20 20.0tert-Butyl benzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 5.00Carbon Tetrachloride 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.90 µg/L 1.90 5.00Chlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.90 µg/L 1.90 5.00Chlorodibromomethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<4.30 µg/L 4.30 10.0Chloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.20 µg/L 2.20 5.00Chloroform 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.20 µg/L 2.20 5.00
Chloromethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.002-Chlorotoluene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.004-Chlorotoluene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
232 µg/L 5.00 5.00Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<11.0 µg/L 11.0 20.01,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,2-Dibromoethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.30 µg/L 2.30 5.00Dibromomethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 22 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97930 Matrix:
1/19/2023 14:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V29285 01/27/23 14:00 V29337 01/30/23 09:00
<2.20 µg/L 2.20 5.001,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.90 µg/L 1.90 5.001,3-Dichlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.10 µg/L 2.10 5.001,4-Dichlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<12.0 µg/L 12.0 50.0Dichlorodifluoromethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.40 µg/L 2.40 5.001,1-Dichloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.001,2-Dichloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.001,1-Dichloroethene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.00cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 5.00
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.90 µg/L 1.90 5.001,2-Dichloropropane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.30 µg/L 1.30 5.001,3-Dichloropropane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.10 µg/L 2.10 20.02,2-Dichloropropane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.00 µg/L 2.00 5.001,1-Dichloropropene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.10 µg/L 2.10 5.00cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 5.00trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<420 µg/L 420 2000
Ethanol 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
265 µg/L 1.70 5.00Ethylbenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<3.50 µg/L 3.50 30.0Hexachlorobutadiene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<3.80 µg/L 3.80 10.02-Hexanone 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
17.4 µg/L 1.80 5.00Isopropylbenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<0.890 µg/L 0.890 5.004-Isopropyl toluene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<7.10 µg/L 7.10 50.0Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 23 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97930 Matrix:
1/19/2023 14:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V29285 01/27/23 14:00 V29337 01/30/23 09:00
2270 µg/L 14.0 100Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)100 01/30/23 17:35 V29338MSA
<0.780 µg/L 0.780 10.04-Methyl-2-Pentanone 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<3.30 µg/L 3.30 20.0Methylene Chloride 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
70.9 µg/L 4.70 10.0Naphthalene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
45.7 µg/L 1.90 5.00n-Propylbenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.20 µg/L 2.20 5.00Styrene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.60 µg/L 1.60 5.001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.60 µg/L 1.60 5.001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.20 µg/L 2.20 5.00
Tetrachloroethene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
373 µg/L 2.20 5.00Toluene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<3.80 µg/L 3.80 5.001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<3.10 µg/L 3.10 5.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.60 µg/L 1.60 5.001,1,1-Trichloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<0.960 µg/L 0.960 5.001,1,2-Trichloroethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 5.00Trichloroethene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.80 µg/L 1.80 5.00
Trichlorofluoromethane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<2.70 µg/L 2.70 5.001,2,3-Trichloropropane 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
274 µg/L 1.90 5.001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
19.8 µg/L 1.80 5.001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<10.0 µg/L 10.0 50.0Vinyl Acetate 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
<1.70 µg/L 1.70 5.00Vinyl Chloride 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
248 µg/L 2.10 5.00o-Xylene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 24 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97930 Matrix:
1/19/2023 14:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
6200 PT
6200B Prep Batch(es):V29285 01/27/23 14:00 V29337 01/30/23 09:00
932 µg/L 4.20 10.0m,p-Xylene 10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286MSA
1180 µg/L 2.10 5.00Xylene (Total)10 01/28/23 08:27 V29286
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 Limits: 70-130%01/28/23 08:2710 MSA V29286
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 107 Limits: 70-130%01/28/23 08:2710 MSA V29286
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 102 Limits: 70-130%01/28/23 08:2710 MSA V29286
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.6 Limits: 70-130%01/28/23 08:2710 MSA V29286
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 Limits: 70-130%01/30/23 17:35100 MSA V29338
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 107 Limits: 70-130%01/30/23 17:35100 MSA V29338
Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane - d4 104 Limits: 70-130%01/30/23 17:35100 MSA V29338
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.6 Limits: 70-130%01/30/23 17:35100 MSA V29338
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V29148 01/25/23 08:52
<0.309 µg/L 0.309 2.05Acenaphthene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.304 µg/L 0.304 2.05Acenaphthylene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.856 µg/L 0.856 2.05Anthracene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.36 µg/L 1.36 10.3
Benzidine 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.652 µg/L 0.652 2.05Benzo(a)anthracene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.05 µg/L 1.05 2.05Benzo(a)pyrene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<2.55 µg/L 2.55 5.13Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.04 µg/L 1.04 5.13Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 25 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97930 Matrix:
1/19/2023 14:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V29148 01/25/23 08:52
<2.04 µg/L 2.04 5.13Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.13 µg/L 1.13 10.3Benzoic Acid 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.701 µg/L 0.701 5.13Benzyl alcohol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.480 µg/L 0.480 5.13Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.07 µg/L 1.07 5.13Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.11 µg/L 1.11 5.13Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<24.7 µg/L 24.7 51.3Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.14 µg/L 1.14 5.134-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.88 µg/L 1.88 5.13
Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.21 µg/L 1.21 5.134-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<7.56 µg/L 7.56 20.52-Chloronaphthalene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.966 µg/L 0.966 10.32-Chlorophenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.75 µg/L 1.75 5.134-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.415 µg/L 0.415 2.05Chrysene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.444 µg/L 0.444 2.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.878 µg/L 0.878 5.13
Dibenzofuran 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.131,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<2.05 µg/L 2.05 5.131,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<2.10 µg/L 2.10 5.131,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.94 µg/L 1.94 5.133,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.50 µg/L 1.50 10.32,4-Dichlorophenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.764 µg/L 0.764 5.13Diethyl phthalate 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 26 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97930 Matrix:
1/19/2023 14:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V29148 01/25/23 08:52
<0.963 µg/L 0.963 5.13Dimethyl phthalate 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.61 µg/L 1.61 20.52,4-Dimethylphenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<2.11 µg/L 2.11 5.13Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<2.13 µg/L 2.13 10.34,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.98 µg/L 1.98 10.32,4-Dinitrophenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.14 µg/L 1.14 5.132,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.830 µg/L 0.830 5.132,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.69 µg/L 1.69 5.13Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.256 µg/L 0.256 2.05
Fluoranthene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.827 µg/L 0.827 2.05Fluorene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.00 µg/L 1.00 5.13Hexachlorobenzene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<2.80 µg/L 2.80 5.13Hexachlorobutadiene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<2.10 µg/L 2.10 5.13Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.81 µg/L 1.81 5.13Hexachloroethane 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.488 µg/L 0.488 2.05Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.455 µg/L 0.455 5.13
Isophorone 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
8.73 µg/L 1.17 2.051-Methylnaphthalene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
12.6 µg/L 0.682 2.052-Methylnaphthalene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
31.5 µg/L 0.746 2.05Naphthalene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.928 µg/L 0.928 5.13Nitrobenzene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.505 µg/L 0.505 5.132-Nitrophenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.27 µg/L 1.27 10.34-Nitrophenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 27 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97930 Matrix:
1/19/2023 14:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
625.1 (Prep)
625.1 Prep Batch(es):V29148 01/25/23 08:52
<1.13 µg/L 1.13 5.13N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.657 µg/L 0.657 5.13N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.47 µg/L 1.47 5.13Pentachlorophenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.438 µg/L 0.438 2.05Phenanthrene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.667 µg/L 0.667 5.13Phenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<0.444 µg/L 0.444 2.05Pyrene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<2.27 µg/L 2.27 5.131,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
<1.35 µg/L 1.35 5.132,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 01/25/23 19:09 V29180JMV
625.1Surrogate: Phenol-d5 26.0 Limits: 10-63%01/25/23 19:091 JMV
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 64.5 Limits: 49-118%01/25/23 19:091 JMV V29180
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 34.4 Limits: 22-84%01/25/23 19:091 JMV V29180
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 62.0 Limits: 43-123%01/25/23 19:091 JMV V29180
Surrogate: 4-Terphenyl-d14 75.8 Limits: 49-151%01/25/23 19:091 JMV V29180
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 60.6 Limits: 31-144%01/25/23 19:091 JMV V29180
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 28 of 68
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28273
23-020-0001
00012
CES Group
3525 Whitehall Park Drive, Suite 150
Greg Hans
Charlotte
Received : 01/20/2023
Snyders Phillips 66
Report Date : 02/01/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MW-6
97930 Matrix:
1/19/2023 14:20
Aqueous
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
MAEPH (Prep)
MADEP-EPH Prep Batch(es):V29150 01/25/23 10:23
90.1 J µg/L 28.8 357Aliphatic C9-C18 1 01/26/23 15:40 V29194AMP
<126 µg/L 126 510Aliphatic C19-C36 1 01/26/23 15:40 V29194AMP
285 µg/L 62.4 255Aromatic C11-C22 1 01/26/23 15:40 V29194AMP
MADEP-EPHSurrogate: 2-Bromonaphthalene 129 Limits: 40-140%01/26/23 15:401 AMP
MADEP-EPHSurrogate: Chlorooctadecane 85.8 Limits: 40-140%01/26/23 15:401 AMP
MADEP-EPHSurrogate: OTP Surrogate 94.1 Limits: 40-140%01/26/23 15:401 AMP
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 127 Limits: 40-140%01/26/23 15:401 AMP V29194
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
MAVPH (Prep)
MADEP-VPH Prep Batch(es):V29104 01/24/23 08:00
1650 µg/L 115 500
Aliphatic C5-C8 10 01/25/23 09:17 V29105TBL
3450 µg/L 258 500Aliphatic C9-C12 10 01/25/23 09:17 V29105TBL
786 µg/L 40.2 500Aromatic C9-C10 10 01/25/23 09:17 V29105TBL
MADEP-VPHSurrogate: 2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)85.1 Limits: 70-130%01/25/23 09:1710 TBL
MADEP-VPHSurrogate: 2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)76.9 Limits: 70-130%01/25/23 09:1710 TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFOutside QC Limit*
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 29 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29286QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29285
Associated Lab Samples: 97930
LRB-V29285 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/28/23 00:1610.01.80<1.80µg/LAcetone
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/LBenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.2100.471µg/LBromobenzene
01/28/23 00:161.000.420<0.420µg/LBromochloromethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.160<0.160µg/LBromodichloromethane
01/28/23 00:165.001.50<1.50µg/LBromoform
01/28/23 00:161.000.280<0.280µg/LBromomethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/Ln-Butylbenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/Lsec-Butyl benzene
01/28/23 00:162.000.920<0.920µg/Ltert-Butyl benzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/LCarbon Tetrachloride
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/LChlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/LChlorodibromomethane
01/28/23 00:161.000.430<0.430µg/LChloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/LChloroform
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/LChloromethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/L2-Chlorotoluene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/L4-Chlorotoluene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.500<0.500µg/LDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)
01/28/23 00:162.001.10<1.10µg/L1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/L1,2-Dibromoethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.230<0.230µg/LDibromomethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.210<0.210µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:165.001.20<1.20µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.240<0.240µg/L1,1-Dichloroethane
Page 1 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 30 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29286QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29285
Associated Lab Samples: 97930
LRB-V29285 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/28/23 00:160.5000.150<0.150µg/L1,2-Dichloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.150<0.150µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,2-Dichloropropane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.130<0.130µg/L1,3-Dichloropropane
01/28/23 00:162.000.210<0.210µg/L2,2-Dichloropropane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/L1,1-Dichloropropene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.210<0.210µg/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.150<0.150µg/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
01/28/23 00:1620042.0<42.0µg/LEthanol
01/28/23 00:160.5000.170<0.170µg/LEthylbenzene
01/28/23 00:163.000.350<0.350µg/LHexachlorobutadiene
01/28/23 00:161.000.380<0.380µg/L2-Hexanone
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/LIsopropylbenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.089<0.089µg/L4-Isopropyl toluene
01/28/23 00:165.000.710<0.710µg/LMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
01/28/23 00:161.000.078<0.078µg/L4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
01/28/23 00:162.000.330<0.330µg/LMethylene Chloride
01/28/23 00:161.000.470<0.470µg/LNaphthalene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/Ln-Propylbenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/LStyrene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/LTetrachloroethene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/LToluene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.380<0.380µg/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
Page 2 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 31 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29286QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29285
Associated Lab Samples: 97930
LRB-V29285 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/28/23 00:160.5000.310<0.310µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.096<0.096µg/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/LTrichloroethene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.270<0.270µg/L1,2,3-Trichloropropane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
01/28/23 00:165.001.00<1.00µg/LVinyl Acetate
01/28/23 00:160.5000.170<0.170µg/LVinyl Chloride
01/28/23 00:160.5000.210<0.210µg/Lo-Xylene
01/28/23 00:161.000.420<0.420µg/Lm,p-Xylene
01/28/23 00:164-Bromofluorobenzene (S)102 70-130
01/28/23 00:16Dibromofluoromethane (S)106 70-130
01/28/23 00:161,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)103 70-130
01/28/23 00:16Toluene-d8 (S)99.4 70-130
LCS-V29285 LCSD-V29285Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
41.2 10310441.740.0µg/LAcetone 40-160 1.2 20.0
20.4 10210721.420.0µg/LBenzene 70-130 4.7 20.0
20.2 10110821.620.0µg/LBromobenzene 70-130 6.6 20.0
21.1 10611122.120.0µg/LBromochloromethane 70-130 4.6 20.0
21.9 11011723.320.0µg/LBromodichloromethane 70-130 6.1 20.0
19.8 99.099.519.920.0µg/LBromoform 70-130 0.5 20.0
Page 3 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 32 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29286QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29285
LCS-V29285 LCSD-V29285Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
25.8 12995.019.020.0µg/LBromomethane 60-140 30.3*20.0
20.2 10110621.220.0µg/Ln-Butylbenzene 70-130 4.8 20.0
20.7 10410621.220.0µg/Lsec-Butyl benzene 70-130 2.3 20.0
20.7 10410821.520.0µg/Ltert-Butyl benzene 70-130 3.7 20.0
23.3 11712224.320.0µg/LCarbon Tetrachloride 70-130 4.2 20.0
19.9 99.510520.920.0µg/LChlorobenzene 70-130 4.9 20.0
20.5 10397.519.520.0µg/LChlorodibromomethane 70-130 5.0 20.0
22.2 11112024.020.0µg/LChloroethane 60-140 7.7 20.0
20.8 10410521.020.0µg/LChloroform 70-130 0.9 20.0
19.9 99.510420.820.0µg/LChloromethane 60-140 4.4 20.0
19.3 96.511222.420.0µg/L2-Chlorotoluene 70-130 14.8 20.0
20.8 10410721.420.0µg/L4-Chlorotoluene 70-130 2.8 20.0
21.4 10710821.620.0µg/LDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)70-130 0.9 20.0
21.6 10810621.120.0µg/L1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 70-130 2.3 20.0
21.5 10811322.520.0µg/L1,2-Dibromoethane 70-130 4.5 20.0
21.2 10611222.320.0µg/LDibromomethane 70-130 5.0 20.0
21.3 10710721.420.0µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 0.4 20.0
20.5 10310621.120.0µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 2.8 20.0
19.7 98.510621.220.0µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 7.3 20.0
21.0 10510821.520.0µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane 60-140 2.3 20.0
21.5 10811122.220.0µg/L1,1-Dichloroethane 70-130 3.2 20.0
20.6 10310420.820.0µg/L1,2-Dichloroethane 70-130 0.9 20.0
20.4 10211022.020.0µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene 70-130 7.5 20.0
20.8 10411021.920.0µg/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130 5.1 20.0
20.9 10511022.020.0µg/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130 5.1 20.0
20.8 10411021.920.0µg/L1,2-Dichloropropane 70-130 5.1 20.0
Page 4 of 37* QC Fail Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 33 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29286QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29285
LCS-V29285 LCSD-V29285Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
20.0 10010220.420.0µg/L1,3-Dichloropropane 70-130 1.9 20.0
20.6 10310621.220.0µg/L2,2-Dichloropropane 70-130 2.8 20.0
22.6 11312124.120.0µg/L1,1-Dichloropropene 70-130 6.4 20.0
21.5 10811122.120.0µg/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130 2.7 20.0
21.5 10811122.120.0µg/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130 2.7 20.0
368 73.695.8479500µg/LEthanol 60-140 26.2*20.0
19.5 97.510320.520.0µg/LEthylbenzene 70-130 5.0 20.0
20.8 10411122.120.0µg/LHexachlorobutadiene 70-130 6.0 20.0
20.8 10410721.420.0µg/L2-Hexanone 60-140 2.8 20.0
21.5 10810921.720.0µg/LIsopropylbenzene 70-130 0.9 20.0
20.7 10411021.920.0µg/L4-Isopropyl toluene 70-130 5.6 20.0
19.4 97.099.019.820.0µg/LMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)60-140 2.0 20.0
21.5 10810621.220.0µg/L4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 60-140 1.4 20.0
21.1 10610521.020.0µg/LMethylene Chloride 70-130 0.4 20.0
19.1 95.595.519.120.0µg/LNaphthalene 70-130 0.0 20.0
20.0 10010721.420.0µg/Ln-Propylbenzene 70-130 6.7 20.0
21.1 10611122.120.0µg/LStyrene 70-130 4.6 20.0
20.2 10110220.320.0µg/L1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130 0.4 20.0
20.7 10410220.320.0µg/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130 1.9 20.0
18.7 93.510821.520.0µg/LTetrachloroethene 70-130 13.9 20.0
21.0 10510721.420.0µg/LToluene 70-130 1.8 20.0
22.5 11311723.320.0µg/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 70-130 3.4 20.0
22.2 11111222.320.0µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70-130 0.4 20.0
21.9 11011623.120.0µg/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane 70-130 5.3 20.0
20.9 10510721.420.0µg/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane 70-130 2.3 20.0
20.2 10110621.220.0µg/LTrichloroethene 70-130 4.8 20.0
Page 5 of 37* QC Fail Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 34 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29286QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29285
LCS-V29285 LCSD-V29285Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
22.6 11311322.520.0µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane 60-140 0.4 20.0
18.9 94.596.519.320.0µg/L1,2,3-Trichloropropane 70-130 2.0 20.0
20.4 10210721.420.0µg/L1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 70-130 4.7 20.0
20.9 10511122.220.0µg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 70-130 6.0 20.0
20.7 10494.518.920.0µg/LVinyl Acetate 60-140 9.0 20.0
23.1 11684.016.820.0µg/LVinyl Chloride 60-140 31.5*20.0
19.9 99.510521.020.0µg/Lo-Xylene 70-130 5.3 20.0
42.0 10510943.440.0µg/Lm,p-Xylene 70-130 3.2 20.0
1011034-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
105106Dibromofluoromethane (S)70-130
1021021,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)70-130
99.0101Toluene-d8 (S)70-130
Page 6 of 37* QC Fail Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 35 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29338QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29337
Associated Lab Samples: 97930
LRB-V29337 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/30/23 15:471.000.140<0.140µg/LMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
01/30/23 15:474-Bromofluorobenzene (S)101 70-130
01/30/23 15:47Dibromofluoromethane (S)108 70-130
01/30/23 15:471,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)103 70-130
01/30/23 15:47Toluene-d8 (S)99.8 70-130
LCS-V29337 LCSD-V29337Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
23.4 11712224.320.0µg/LMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)70-130 3.7 20.0
1031004-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
105108Dibromofluoromethane (S)70-130
1011041,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)70-130
99.298.6Toluene-d8 (S)70-130
Page 7 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 36 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29360QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29358
Associated Lab Samples: 97928
LRB-V29358 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/28/23 00:160.5000.210<0.210µg/LBromobenzene
01/28/23 00:161.000.420<0.420µg/LBromochloromethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.160<0.160µg/LBromodichloromethane
01/28/23 00:165.001.50<1.50µg/LBromoform
01/28/23 00:161.000.280<0.280µg/LBromomethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/Ln-Butylbenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/Lsec-Butyl benzene
01/28/23 00:162.000.920<0.920µg/Ltert-Butyl benzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/LCarbon Tetrachloride
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/LChlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/LChlorodibromomethane
01/28/23 00:161.000.430<0.430µg/LChloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/LChloroform
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/LChloromethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/L2-Chlorotoluene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/L4-Chlorotoluene
01/28/23 00:162.001.10<1.10µg/L1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/L1,2-Dibromoethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.230<0.230µg/LDibromomethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.210<0.210µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:165.001.20<1.20µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.240<0.240µg/L1,1-Dichloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.150<0.150µg/L1,2-Dichloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.150<0.150µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Page 8 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 37 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29360QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29358
Associated Lab Samples: 97928
LRB-V29358 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,2-Dichloropropane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.130<0.130µg/L1,3-Dichloropropane
01/28/23 00:162.000.210<0.210µg/L2,2-Dichloropropane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.200<0.200µg/L1,1-Dichloropropene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.210<0.210µg/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.150<0.150µg/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
01/28/23 00:1620042.0<42.0µg/LEthanol
01/28/23 00:163.000.350<0.350µg/LHexachlorobutadiene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/LIsopropylbenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.089<0.089µg/L4-Isopropyl toluene
01/28/23 00:165.000.710<0.710µg/LMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
01/28/23 00:161.000.078<0.078µg/L4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
01/28/23 00:162.000.330<0.330µg/LMethylene Chloride
01/28/23 00:161.000.470<0.470µg/LNaphthalene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.190<0.190µg/Ln-Propylbenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/LStyrene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.220<0.220µg/LTetrachloroethene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.380<0.380µg/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.310<0.310µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.160<0.160µg/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.096<0.096µg/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/LTrichloroethene
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane
01/28/23 00:160.5000.270<0.270µg/L1,2,3-Trichloropropane
Page 9 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 38 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29360QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29358
Associated Lab Samples: 97928
LRB-V29358 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/28/23 00:160.5000.180<0.180µg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
01/28/23 00:165.001.00<1.00µg/LVinyl Acetate
01/28/23 00:160.5000.170<0.170µg/LVinyl Chloride
01/28/23 00:164-Bromofluorobenzene (S)102 70-130
01/28/23 00:16Dibromofluoromethane (S)106 70-130
01/28/23 00:161,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)103 70-130
01/28/23 00:16Toluene-d8 (S)99.4 70-130
LCS-V29358 LCSD-V29358Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
20.2 10110821.620.0µg/LBromobenzene 70-130 6.6 20.0
21.1 10611122.120.0µg/LBromochloromethane 70-130 4.6 20.0
21.9 11011723.320.0µg/LBromodichloromethane 70-130 6.1 20.0
19.8 99.099.519.920.0µg/LBromoform 70-130 0.5 20.0
25.8 12995.019.020.0µg/LBromomethane 60-140 30.3*20.0
20.2 10110621.220.0µg/Ln-Butylbenzene 70-130 4.8 20.0
20.7 10410621.220.0µg/Lsec-Butyl benzene 70-130 2.3 20.0
20.7 10410821.520.0µg/Ltert-Butyl benzene 70-130 3.7 20.0
23.3 11712224.320.0µg/LCarbon Tetrachloride 70-130 4.2 20.0
19.9 99.510520.920.0µg/LChlorobenzene 70-130 4.9 20.0
20.5 10397.519.520.0µg/LChlorodibromomethane 70-130 5.0 20.0
22.2 11112024.020.0µg/LChloroethane 60-140 7.7 20.0
20.8 10410521.020.0µg/LChloroform 70-130 0.9 20.0
19.9 99.510420.820.0µg/LChloromethane 60-140 4.4 20.0
19.3 96.511222.420.0µg/L2-Chlorotoluene 70-130 14.8 20.0
Page 10 of 37* QC Fail Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 39 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29360QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29358
LCS-V29358 LCSD-V29358Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
20.8 10410721.420.0µg/L4-Chlorotoluene 70-130 2.8 20.0
21.6 10810621.120.0µg/L1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 70-130 2.3 20.0
21.5 10811322.520.0µg/L1,2-Dibromoethane 70-130 4.5 20.0
21.2 10611222.320.0µg/LDibromomethane 70-130 5.0 20.0
21.3 10710721.420.0µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 0.4 20.0
20.5 10310621.120.0µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 2.8 20.0
19.7 98.510621.220.0µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 70-130 7.3 20.0
21.0 10510821.520.0µg/LDichlorodifluoromethane 60-140 2.3 20.0
21.5 10811122.220.0µg/L1,1-Dichloroethane 70-130 3.2 20.0
20.6 10310420.820.0µg/L1,2-Dichloroethane 70-130 0.9 20.0
20.4 10211022.020.0µg/L1,1-Dichloroethene 70-130 7.5 20.0
20.8 10411021.920.0µg/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130 5.1 20.0
20.9 10511022.020.0µg/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130 5.1 20.0
20.8 10411021.920.0µg/L1,2-Dichloropropane 70-130 5.1 20.0
20.0 10010220.420.0µg/L1,3-Dichloropropane 70-130 1.9 20.0
20.6 10310621.220.0µg/L2,2-Dichloropropane 70-130 2.8 20.0
22.6 11312124.120.0µg/L1,1-Dichloropropene 70-130 6.4 20.0
21.5 10811122.120.0µg/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130 2.7 20.0
21.5 10811122.120.0µg/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130 2.7 20.0
368 73.695.8479500µg/LEthanol 60-140 26.2*20.0
20.8 10411122.120.0µg/LHexachlorobutadiene 70-130 6.0 20.0
21.5 10810921.720.0µg/LIsopropylbenzene 70-130 0.9 20.0
20.7 10411021.920.0µg/L4-Isopropyl toluene 70-130 5.6 20.0
19.4 97.099.019.820.0µg/LMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)60-140 2.0 20.0
21.5 10810621.220.0µg/L4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 60-140 1.4 20.0
21.1 10610521.020.0µg/LMethylene Chloride 70-130 0.4 20.0
Page 11 of 37* QC Fail Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 40 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29360QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29358
LCS-V29358 LCSD-V29358Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
19.1 95.595.519.120.0µg/LNaphthalene 70-130 0.0 20.0
20.0 10010721.420.0µg/Ln-Propylbenzene 70-130 6.7 20.0
21.1 10611122.120.0µg/LStyrene 70-130 4.6 20.0
20.2 10110220.320.0µg/L1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130 0.4 20.0
20.7 10410220.320.0µg/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130 1.9 20.0
18.7 93.510821.520.0µg/LTetrachloroethene 70-130 13.9 20.0
22.5 11311723.320.0µg/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 70-130 3.4 20.0
22.2 11111222.320.0µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70-130 0.4 20.0
21.9 11011623.120.0µg/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane 70-130 5.3 20.0
20.9 10510721.420.0µg/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane 70-130 2.3 20.0
20.2 10110621.220.0µg/LTrichloroethene 70-130 4.8 20.0
22.6 11311322.520.0µg/LTrichlorofluoromethane 60-140 0.4 20.0
18.9 94.596.519.320.0µg/L1,2,3-Trichloropropane 70-130 2.0 20.0
20.9 10511122.220.0µg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 70-130 6.0 20.0
20.7 10494.518.920.0µg/LVinyl Acetate 60-140 9.0 20.0
23.1 11684.016.820.0µg/LVinyl Chloride 60-140 31.5*20.0
1011034-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
105106Dibromofluoromethane (S)70-130
1021021,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)70-130
99.0101Toluene-d8 (S)70-130
Page 12 of 37* QC Fail Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 41 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29364QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29363
Associated Lab Samples: 97928
LRB-V29363 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/30/23 15:4710.01.80<1.80µg/LAcetone
01/30/23 15:470.5000.180<0.180µg/LBenzene
01/30/23 15:470.5000.500<0.500µg/LDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)
01/30/23 15:470.5000.170<0.170µg/LEthylbenzene
01/30/23 15:471.000.380<0.380µg/L2-Hexanone
01/30/23 15:471.000.140<0.140µg/LMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
01/30/23 15:470.5000.220<0.220µg/LToluene
01/30/23 15:470.5000.190<0.190µg/L1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
01/30/23 15:470.5000.210<0.210µg/Lo-Xylene
01/30/23 15:471.000.420<0.420µg/Lm,p-Xylene
01/30/23 15:474-Bromofluorobenzene (S)101 70-130
01/30/23 15:47Dibromofluoromethane (S)108 70-130
01/30/23 15:471,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)103 70-130
01/30/23 15:47Toluene-d8 (S)99.8 70-130
LCS-V29363 LCSD-V29363Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
50.3 12612951.640.0µg/LAcetone 40-160 2.5 20.0
21.5 10811222.320.0µg/LBenzene 70-130 3.6 20.0
23.7 11912224.420.0µg/LDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)70-130 2.9 20.0
20.8 10410320.520.0µg/LEthylbenzene 70-130 1.4 20.0
23.8 11911623.120.0µg/L2-Hexanone 60-140 2.9 20.0
23.4 11712224.320.0µg/LMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)70-130 3.7 20.0
22.1 11111422.720.0µg/LToluene 70-130 2.6 20.0
22.8 11411222.420.0µg/L1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 70-130 1.7 20.0
Page 13 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 42 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
6200B
V29364QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
6200 PT
QC Prep:V29363
LCS-V29363 LCSD-V29363Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
22.3 11211122.120.0µg/Lo-Xylene 70-130 0.9 20.0
43.7 10911244.640.0µg/Lm,p-Xylene 70-130 2.0 20.0
1031004-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
105108Dibromofluoromethane (S)70-130
1011041,2-Dichloroethane - d4 (S)70-130
99.298.6Toluene-d8 (S)70-130
Page 14 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 43 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29180QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29148
Associated Lab Samples: 97930
LRB-V29148 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/25/23 15:242.000.302<0.302µg/LAcenaphthene
01/25/23 15:242.000.297<0.297µg/LAcenaphthylene
01/25/23 15:242.000.836<0.836µg/LAnthracene
01/25/23 15:2410.01.32<1.32µg/LBenzidine
01/25/23 15:242.000.637<0.637µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene
01/25/23 15:242.001.02<1.02µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene
01/25/23 15:245.002.49<2.49µg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene
01/25/23 15:245.001.01<1.01µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
01/25/23 15:245.001.99<1.99µg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene
01/25/23 15:2410.01.10<1.10µg/LBenzoic Acid
01/25/23 15:245.000.684<0.684µg/LBenzyl alcohol
01/25/23 15:245.000.468<0.468µg/LBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
01/25/23 15:245.001.04<1.04µg/LBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
01/25/23 15:245.001.08<1.08µg/LBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
01/25/23 15:2450.024.0<24.0µg/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
01/25/23 15:245.001.11<1.11µg/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
01/25/23 15:245.001.83<1.83µg/LButyl benzyl phthalate
01/25/23 15:245.001.18<1.18µg/L4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
01/25/23 15:2420.07.38<7.38µg/L2-Chloronaphthalene
01/25/23 15:2410.00.938<0.938µg/L2-Chlorophenol
01/25/23 15:245.001.71<1.71µg/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
01/25/23 15:242.000.405<0.405µg/LChrysene
01/25/23 15:242.000.434<0.434µg/LDibenz(a,h)anthracene
01/25/23 15:245.000.856<0.856µg/LDibenzofuran
01/25/23 15:245.002.00<2.00µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene
01/25/23 15:245.002.00<2.00µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene
01/25/23 15:245.002.05<2.05µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Page 15 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 44 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29180QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29148
Associated Lab Samples: 97930
LRB-V29148 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/25/23 15:245.001.89<1.89µg/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
01/25/23 15:2410.01.46<1.46µg/L2,4-Dichlorophenol
01/25/23 15:245.000.745<0.745µg/LDiethyl phthalate
01/25/23 15:245.000.939<0.939µg/LDimethyl phthalate
01/25/23 15:2420.01.57<1.57µg/L2,4-Dimethylphenol
01/25/23 15:245.002.06<2.06µg/LDi-n-butyl phthalate
01/25/23 15:2410.02.07<2.07µg/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
01/25/23 15:2410.01.92<1.92µg/L2,4-Dinitrophenol
01/25/23 15:245.001.11<1.11µg/L2,4-Dinitrotoluene
01/25/23 15:245.000.809<0.809µg/L2,6-Dinitrotoluene
01/25/23 15:245.001.65<1.65µg/LDi-n-Octyl Phthalate
01/25/23 15:242.000.250<0.250µg/LFluoranthene
01/25/23 15:242.000.807<0.807µg/LFluorene
01/25/23 15:245.000.979<0.979µg/LHexachlorobenzene
01/25/23 15:245.002.73<2.73µg/LHexachlorobutadiene
01/25/23 15:245.002.05<2.05µg/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene
01/25/23 15:245.001.76<1.76µg/LHexachloroethane
01/25/23 15:242.000.477<0.477µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
01/25/23 15:245.000.444<0.444µg/LIsophorone
01/25/23 15:242.001.14<1.14µg/L1-Methylnaphthalene
01/25/23 15:242.000.666<0.666µg/L2-Methylnaphthalene
01/25/23 15:242.000.728<0.728µg/LNaphthalene
01/25/23 15:245.000.905<0.905µg/LNitrobenzene
01/25/23 15:245.000.493<0.493µg/L2-Nitrophenol
01/25/23 15:2410.01.23<1.23µg/L4-Nitrophenol
01/25/23 15:245.001.10<1.10µg/LN-Nitrosodiphenylamine
01/25/23 15:245.000.641<0.641µg/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
Page 16 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 45 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29180QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29148
Associated Lab Samples: 97930
LRB-V29148 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/25/23 15:245.001.43<1.43µg/LPentachlorophenol
01/25/23 15:242.000.428<0.428µg/LPhenanthrene
01/25/23 15:245.000.651<0.651µg/LPhenol
01/25/23 15:242.000.434<0.434µg/LPyrene
01/25/23 15:245.002.21<2.21µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
01/25/23 15:245.001.32<1.32µg/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
01/25/23 15:242-Fluorobiphenyl (S)76.2 49-118
01/25/23 15:242-Fluorophenol (S)44.4 22-84
01/25/23 15:24Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)68.0 43-123
01/25/23 15:244-Terphenyl-d14 (S)88.2 49-151
01/25/23 15:242,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)81.9 31-144
01/25/23 15:24Phenol-d5 (S)30.8 10-63
LCS-V29148 LCSD-V29148Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
37.0 74.076.838.450.0µg/LAcenaphthene 47-145 3.7 20.0
37.6 75.276.838.450.0µg/LAcenaphthylene 33-145 2.1 20.0
43.1 86.287.443.750.0µg/LAnthracene 27-133 1.3 20.0
14.7 29.443.621.850.0µg/LBenzidine 15-150 38.9*20.0
42.8 85.687.843.950.0µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene 33-143 2.5 20.0
65.6 13113768.650.0µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene 17-163 4.4 20.0
60.6 12112562.350.0µg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene 24-159 2.7 20.0
56.5 11311758.750.0µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 10-219 3.8 20.0
59.7 11912662.950.0µg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene 11-162 5.2 20.0
16.4 32.835.017.550.0µg/LBenzoic Acid 10-125 6.4 20.0
Page 17 of 37* QC Fail Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 46 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29180QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29148
LCS-V29148 LCSD-V29148Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
33.5 67.064.432.250.0µg/LBenzyl alcohol 16-107 3.9 20.0
33.1 66.263.831.950.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 33-184 3.6 20.0
26.5 53.051.625.850.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 12-158 2.6 20.0
30.6 61.261.430.750.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 36-166 0.3 20.0
46.7 93.497.248.650.0µg/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 10-158 3.9 20.0
42.3 84.685.642.850.0µg/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 53-127 1.1 20.0
48.3 96.698.449.250.0µg/LButyl benzyl phthalate 10-152 1.8 20.0
35.6 71.271.235.650.0µg/L4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 22-147 0.0 20.0
34.4 68.870.035.050.0µg/L2-Chloronaphthalene 60-118 1.7 20.0
28.9 57.856.428.250.0µg/L2-Chlorophenol 23-134 2.4 20.0
39.8 79.684.042.050.0µg/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 25-158 5.3 20.0
43.9 87.891.445.750.0µg/LChrysene 17-168 4.0 20.0
56.8 11411657.850.0µg/LDibenz(a,h)anthracene 10-227 1.7 20.0
38.4 76.878.039.050.0µg/LDibenzofuran 39-114 1.5 20.0
23.3 46.647.623.850.0µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 32-129 2.1 20.0
23.0 46.046.223.150.0µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 20-124 0.4 20.0
22.4 44.844.422.250.0µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 20-124 0.8 20.0
35.1 70.273.236.650.0µg/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 10-262 4.1 20.0
32.1 64.262.431.250.0µg/L2,4-Dichlorophenol 39-135 2.8 20.0
43.3 86.690.045.050.0µg/LDiethyl phthalate 10-114 3.8 20.0
42.4 84.886.843.450.0µg/LDimethyl phthalate 10-112 2.3 20.0
35.8 71.669.034.550.0µg/L2,4-Dimethylphenol 32-119 3.6 20.0
46.7 93.495.647.850.0µg/LDi-n-butyl phthalate 10-118 2.3 20.0
41.9 83.885.042.550.0µg/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 10-181 1.4 20.0
41.6 83.287.243.650.0µg/L2,4-Dinitrophenol 10-191 4.6 20.0
44.4 88.890.645.350.0µg/L2,4-Dinitrotoluene 39-139 2.0 20.0
Page 18 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 47 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29180QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29148
LCS-V29148 LCSD-V29148Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
43.6 87.289.644.850.0µg/L2,6-Dinitrotoluene 50-158 2.7 20.0
64.2 12813165.450.0µg/LDi-n-Octyl Phthalate 10-146 1.8 20.0
42.6 85.287.843.950.0µg/LFluoranthene 26-137 3.0 20.0
40.6 81.284.042.050.0µg/LFluorene 59-121 3.3 20.0
41.5 83.084.242.150.0µg/LHexachlorobenzene 10-152 1.4 20.0
22.4 44.845.422.750.0µg/LHexachlorobutadiene 24-116 1.3 20.0
18.6 37.236.618.350.0µg/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene 32-117 1.6 20.0
20.9 41.843.421.750.0µg/LHexachloroethane 40-113 3.7 20.0
56.0 11211557.350.0µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 10-171 2.2 20.0
23.9 47.846.223.150.0µg/LIsophorone 21-196 3.4 20.0
28.1 56.258.229.150.0µg/L1-Methylnaphthalene 40-135 3.4 20.0
26.8 53.654.627.350.0µg/L2-Methylnaphthalene 18-121 1.8 20.0
25.2 50.451.225.650.0µg/LNaphthalene 21-133 1.5 20.0
29.0 58.058.429.250.0µg/LNitrobenzene 35-180 0.6 20.0
28.9 57.857.228.650.0µg/L2-Nitrophenol 29-182 1.0 20.0
19.2 38.440.420.250.0µg/L4-Nitrophenol 10-132 5.0 20.0
53.2 10610753.650.0µg/LN-Nitrosodiphenylamine 69-152 0.7 20.0
34.9 69.864.432.250.0µg/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 10-230 8.0 20.0
46.0 92.093.246.650.0µg/LPentachlorophenol 14-176 1.2 20.0
43.5 87.089.244.650.0µg/LPhenanthrene 54-120 2.4 20.0
14.5 29.027.813.950.0µg/LPhenol 10-112 4.2 20.0
45.0 90.093.646.850.0µg/LPyrene 52-115 3.9 20.0
23.5 47.048.624.350.0µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 44-142 3.3 20.0
39.8 79.678.639.350.0µg/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 37-144 1.2 20.0
74.477.42-Fluorobiphenyl (S)49-118
39.238.52-Fluorophenol (S)22-84
Page 19 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 48 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29180QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29148
LCS-V29148 LCSD-V29148Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
59.658.2Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)43-123
95.21004-Terphenyl-d14 (S)49-151
84.588.62,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)31-144
28.327.6Phenol-d5 (S)10-63
Page 20 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 49 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29239QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29238
Associated Lab Samples: 97928
LRB-V29238 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/25/23 15:242.000.302<0.302µg/LAcenaphthene
01/25/23 15:242.000.297<0.297µg/LAcenaphthylene
01/25/23 15:242.000.836<0.836µg/LAnthracene
01/25/23 15:2410.01.32<1.32µg/LBenzidine
01/25/23 15:242.000.637<0.637µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene
01/25/23 15:242.001.02<1.02µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene
01/25/23 15:245.002.49<2.49µg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene
01/25/23 15:245.001.01<1.01µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
01/25/23 15:245.001.99<1.99µg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene
01/25/23 15:2410.01.10<1.10µg/LBenzoic Acid
01/25/23 15:245.000.684<0.684µg/LBenzyl alcohol
01/25/23 15:245.000.468<0.468µg/LBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
01/25/23 15:245.001.04<1.04µg/LBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
01/25/23 15:245.001.08<1.08µg/LBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
01/25/23 15:2450.024.0<24.0µg/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
01/25/23 15:245.001.11<1.11µg/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
01/25/23 15:245.001.83<1.83µg/LButyl benzyl phthalate
01/25/23 15:245.001.18<1.18µg/L4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
01/25/23 15:2420.07.38<7.38µg/L2-Chloronaphthalene
01/25/23 15:2410.00.938<0.938µg/L2-Chlorophenol
01/25/23 15:245.001.71<1.71µg/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
01/25/23 15:242.000.405<0.405µg/LChrysene
01/25/23 15:242.000.434<0.434µg/LDibenz(a,h)anthracene
01/25/23 15:245.000.856<0.856µg/LDibenzofuran
01/25/23 15:245.002.00<2.00µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene
01/25/23 15:245.002.00<2.00µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene
01/25/23 15:245.002.05<2.05µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Page 21 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 50 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29239QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29238
Associated Lab Samples: 97928
LRB-V29238 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/25/23 15:245.001.89<1.89µg/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
01/25/23 15:2410.01.46<1.46µg/L2,4-Dichlorophenol
01/25/23 15:245.000.745<0.745µg/LDiethyl phthalate
01/25/23 15:245.000.939<0.939µg/LDimethyl phthalate
01/25/23 15:2420.01.57<1.57µg/L2,4-Dimethylphenol
01/25/23 15:245.002.06<2.06µg/LDi-n-butyl phthalate
01/25/23 15:2410.02.07<2.07µg/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
01/25/23 15:2410.01.92<1.92µg/L2,4-Dinitrophenol
01/25/23 15:245.001.11<1.11µg/L2,4-Dinitrotoluene
01/25/23 15:245.000.809<0.809µg/L2,6-Dinitrotoluene
01/25/23 15:245.001.65<1.65µg/LDi-n-Octyl Phthalate
01/25/23 15:242.000.250<0.250µg/LFluoranthene
01/25/23 15:242.000.807<0.807µg/LFluorene
01/25/23 15:245.000.979<0.979µg/LHexachlorobenzene
01/25/23 15:245.002.73<2.73µg/LHexachlorobutadiene
01/25/23 15:245.002.05<2.05µg/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene
01/25/23 15:245.001.76<1.76µg/LHexachloroethane
01/25/23 15:242.000.477<0.477µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
01/25/23 15:245.000.444<0.444µg/LIsophorone
01/25/23 15:242.001.14<1.14µg/L1-Methylnaphthalene
01/25/23 15:242.000.666<0.666µg/L2-Methylnaphthalene
01/25/23 15:242.000.728<0.728µg/LNaphthalene
01/25/23 15:245.000.905<0.905µg/LNitrobenzene
01/25/23 15:245.000.493<0.493µg/L2-Nitrophenol
01/25/23 15:2410.01.23<1.23µg/L4-Nitrophenol
01/25/23 15:245.001.10<1.10µg/LN-Nitrosodiphenylamine
01/25/23 15:245.000.641<0.641µg/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
Page 22 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 51 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29239QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29238
Associated Lab Samples: 97928
LRB-V29238 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/25/23 15:245.001.43<1.43µg/LPentachlorophenol
01/25/23 15:242.000.428<0.428µg/LPhenanthrene
01/25/23 15:245.000.651<0.651µg/LPhenol
01/25/23 15:242.000.434<0.434µg/LPyrene
01/25/23 15:245.002.21<2.21µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
01/25/23 15:245.001.32<1.32µg/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
01/25/23 15:242-Fluorobiphenyl (S)76.2 49-118
01/25/23 15:242-Fluorophenol (S)44.4 22-84
01/25/23 15:24Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)68.0 43-123
01/25/23 15:244-Terphenyl-d14 (S)88.2 49-151
01/25/23 15:242,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)81.9 31-144
01/25/23 15:24Phenol-d5 (S)30.8 10-63
LCS-V29238 LCSD-V29238Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
37.0 74.076.838.450.0µg/LAcenaphthene 47-145 3.7 20.0
37.6 75.276.838.450.0µg/LAcenaphthylene 33-145 2.1 20.0
43.1 86.287.443.750.0µg/LAnthracene 27-133 1.3 20.0
14.7 29.443.621.850.0µg/LBenzidine 15-150 38.9*20.0
42.8 85.687.843.950.0µg/LBenzo(a)anthracene 33-143 2.5 20.0
65.6 13113768.650.0µg/LBenzo(a)pyrene 17-163 4.4 20.0
60.6 12112562.350.0µg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene 24-159 2.7 20.0
56.5 11311758.750.0µg/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 10-219 3.8 20.0
59.7 11912662.950.0µg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene 11-162 5.2 20.0
16.4 32.835.017.550.0µg/LBenzoic Acid 10-125 6.4 20.0
Page 23 of 37* QC Fail Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 52 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29239QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29238
LCS-V29238 LCSD-V29238Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
33.5 67.064.432.250.0µg/LBenzyl alcohol 16-107 3.9 20.0
33.1 66.263.831.950.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 33-184 3.6 20.0
26.5 53.051.625.850.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 12-158 2.6 20.0
30.6 61.261.430.750.0µg/LBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 36-166 0.3 20.0
46.7 93.497.248.650.0µg/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 10-158 3.9 20.0
42.3 84.685.642.850.0µg/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 53-127 1.1 20.0
48.3 96.698.449.250.0µg/LButyl benzyl phthalate 10-152 1.8 20.0
35.6 71.271.235.650.0µg/L4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 22-147 0.0 20.0
34.4 68.870.035.050.0µg/L2-Chloronaphthalene 60-118 1.7 20.0
28.9 57.856.428.250.0µg/L2-Chlorophenol 23-134 2.4 20.0
39.8 79.684.042.050.0µg/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 25-158 5.3 20.0
43.9 87.891.445.750.0µg/LChrysene 17-168 4.0 20.0
56.8 11411657.850.0µg/LDibenz(a,h)anthracene 10-227 1.7 20.0
38.4 76.878.039.050.0µg/LDibenzofuran 39-114 1.5 20.0
23.3 46.647.623.850.0µg/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 32-129 2.1 20.0
23.0 46.046.223.150.0µg/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 20-124 0.4 20.0
22.4 44.844.422.250.0µg/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 20-124 0.8 20.0
35.1 70.273.236.650.0µg/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 10-262 4.1 20.0
32.1 64.262.431.250.0µg/L2,4-Dichlorophenol 39-135 2.8 20.0
43.3 86.690.045.050.0µg/LDiethyl phthalate 10-114 3.8 20.0
42.4 84.886.843.450.0µg/LDimethyl phthalate 10-112 2.3 20.0
35.8 71.669.034.550.0µg/L2,4-Dimethylphenol 32-119 3.6 20.0
46.7 93.495.647.850.0µg/LDi-n-butyl phthalate 10-118 2.3 20.0
41.9 83.885.042.550.0µg/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 10-181 1.4 20.0
41.6 83.287.243.650.0µg/L2,4-Dinitrophenol 10-191 4.6 20.0
44.4 88.890.645.350.0µg/L2,4-Dinitrotoluene 39-139 2.0 20.0
Page 24 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 53 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29239QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29238
LCS-V29238 LCSD-V29238Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
43.6 87.289.644.850.0µg/L2,6-Dinitrotoluene 50-158 2.7 20.0
64.2 12813165.450.0µg/LDi-n-Octyl Phthalate 10-146 1.8 20.0
42.6 85.287.843.950.0µg/LFluoranthene 26-137 3.0 20.0
40.6 81.284.042.050.0µg/LFluorene 59-121 3.3 20.0
41.5 83.084.242.150.0µg/LHexachlorobenzene 10-152 1.4 20.0
22.4 44.845.422.750.0µg/LHexachlorobutadiene 24-116 1.3 20.0
18.6 37.236.618.350.0µg/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene 32-117 1.6 20.0
20.9 41.843.421.750.0µg/LHexachloroethane 40-113 3.7 20.0
56.0 11211557.350.0µg/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 10-171 2.2 20.0
23.9 47.846.223.150.0µg/LIsophorone 21-196 3.4 20.0
28.1 56.258.229.150.0µg/L1-Methylnaphthalene 40-135 3.4 20.0
26.8 53.654.627.350.0µg/L2-Methylnaphthalene 18-121 1.8 20.0
25.2 50.451.225.650.0µg/LNaphthalene 21-133 1.5 20.0
29.0 58.058.429.250.0µg/LNitrobenzene 35-180 0.6 20.0
28.9 57.857.228.650.0µg/L2-Nitrophenol 29-182 1.0 20.0
19.2 38.440.420.250.0µg/L4-Nitrophenol 10-132 5.0 20.0
53.2 10610753.650.0µg/LN-Nitrosodiphenylamine 69-152 0.7 20.0
34.9 69.864.432.250.0µg/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 10-230 8.0 20.0
46.0 92.093.246.650.0µg/LPentachlorophenol 14-176 1.2 20.0
43.5 87.089.244.650.0µg/LPhenanthrene 54-120 2.4 20.0
14.5 29.027.813.950.0µg/LPhenol 10-112 4.2 20.0
45.0 90.093.646.850.0µg/LPyrene 52-115 3.9 20.0
23.5 47.048.624.350.0µg/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 44-142 3.3 20.0
39.8 79.678.639.350.0µg/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 37-144 1.2 20.0
74.477.42-Fluorobiphenyl (S)49-118
39.238.52-Fluorophenol (S)22-84
Page 25 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 54 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
625.1 - Base/Neutrals and Acids by GC/MS
625.1
V29239QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
625.1 (Prep)
QC Prep:V29238
LCS-V29238 LCSD-V29238Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
59.658.2Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)43-123
95.21004-Terphenyl-d14 (S)49-151
84.588.62,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)31-144
28.327.6Phenol-d5 (S)10-63
Page 26 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 55 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V29103QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035
QC Prep:V29102
Associated Lab Samples: 97929
LRB-V29102 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/23/23 10:310.0200.002<0.002mg/KgAcetone
01/23/23 10:310.0200.001<0.001mg/KgAcrolein
01/23/23 10:310.0200.0008<0.0008mg/KgAcrylonitrile
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0006<0.0006mg/KgBenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/KgBromobenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0008<0.0008mg/KgBromochloromethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/KgBromodichloromethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/KgBromoform
01/23/23 10:310.0100.001<0.001mg/KgBromomethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kgn-Butylbenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0006<0.0006mg/Kgsec-Butyl benzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kgtert-Butyl benzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0006<0.0006mg/KgCarbon Disulfide
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/KgCarbon Tetrachloride
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0007<0.0007mg/KgChlorobenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0009<0.0009mg/KgChlorodibromomethane
01/23/23 10:310.0100.0009<0.0009mg/KgChloroethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/KgChloroform
01/23/23 10:310.0100.0006<0.0006mg/KgChloromethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kg2-Chlorotoluene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0004<0.0004mg/Kg4-Chlorotoluene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0007<0.0007mg/KgDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)
01/23/23 10:310.0100.0004<0.0004mg/Kg1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0006<0.0006mg/Kg1,2-Dibromoethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0006<0.0006mg/KgDibromomethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0003<0.0003mg/Kg1,2-Dichlorobenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0004<0.0004mg/Kg1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Page 27 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 56 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V29103QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035
QC Prep:V29102
Associated Lab Samples: 97929
LRB-V29102 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0006<0.0006mg/Kg1,4-Dichlorobenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0100.001<0.001mg/KgDichlorodifluoromethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0008<0.0008mg/Kg1,1-Dichloroethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/Kg1,2-Dichloroethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0007<0.0007mg/Kg1,1-Dichloroethene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0008<0.0008mg/Kgcis-1,2-Dichloroethene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/Kgtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0004<0.0004mg/Kg1,2-Dichloropropane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0006<0.0006mg/Kg1,3-Dichloropropane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/Kg2,2-Dichloropropane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0008<0.0008mg/Kg1,1-Dichloropropene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kgcis-1,3-Dichloropropene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0008<0.0008mg/Kgtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0006<0.0006mg/KgEthylbenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0500.0008<0.0008mg/KgEthyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (ETBE)
01/23/23 10:310.0100.0008<0.0008mg/KgHexachlorobutadiene
01/23/23 10:310.0100.0007<0.0007mg/Kgn-Hexane
01/23/23 10:310.0200.0006<0.0006mg/Kg2-Hexanone
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/KgIsopropylbenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/Kg4-Isopropyl toluene
01/23/23 10:310.0200.0007<0.0007mg/KgMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
01/23/23 10:310.0200.015<0.015mg/Kg4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
01/23/23 10:310.0100.001<0.001mg/KgMethylene Chloride
01/23/23 10:310.0100.0010<0.0010mg/KgNaphthalene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kgn-Propylbenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/KgStyrene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/Kg1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Page 28 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 57 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V29103QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035
QC Prep:V29102
Associated Lab Samples: 97929
LRB-V29102 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0003<0.0003mg/Kg1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0009<0.0009mg/KgTetrachloroethene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0007<0.0007mg/KgToluene
01/23/23 10:310.0100.0005<0.0005mg/Kg1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0100.0006<0.0006mg/Kg1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.001<0.001mg/Kg1,1,1-Trichloroethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kg1,1,2-Trichloroethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0009<0.0009mg/KgTrichloroethene
01/23/23 10:310.0100.002<0.002mg/KgTrichlorofluoromethane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0007<0.0007mg/Kg1,2,3-Trichloropropane
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kg1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kg1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
01/23/23 10:310.0100.0005<0.0005mg/KgVinyl Acetate
01/23/23 10:310.0100.0005<0.0005mg/KgVinyl Chloride
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kgo-Xylene
01/23/23 10:310.0100.001<0.001mg/Kgm,p-Xylene
01/23/23 10:314-Bromofluorobenzene (S)102 70-130
01/23/23 10:31Dibromofluoromethane (S)110 84-123
01/23/23 10:31Toluene-d8 (S)98.4 76-129
LCS-V29102 LCSD-V29102Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
0.103 1031100.1100.100mg/KgAcetone 29-198 6.5 20
0.089 89.191.50.0910.100mg/KgAcrolein 70-130 2.6 20
0.123 1231210.1210.100mg/KgAcrylonitrile 65-134 1.6 20
Page 29 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 58 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V29103QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035
QC Prep:V29102
LCS-V29102 LCSD-V29102Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
0.050 1011060.0520.050mg/KgBenzene 74-127 5.0 20
0.048 97.41000.0500.050mg/KgBromobenzene 73-125 2.8 20
0.053 1081010.0500.050mg/KgBromochloromethane 72-134 6.1 20
0.050 1011060.0530.050mg/KgBromodichloromethane 75-122 4.8 20
0.051 10299.80.0490.050mg/KgBromoform 66-135 2.5 20
0.053 1071080.0540.050mg/KgBromomethane 20-180 1.2 20
0.049 98.61050.0520.050mg/Kgn-Butylbenzene 65-135 6.4 20
0.046 93.299.60.0490.050mg/Kgsec-Butyl benzene 66-131 6.6 20
0.045 90.899.60.0490.050mg/Kgtert-Butyl benzene 67-132 9.2 20
0.045 91.898.80.0490.050mg/KgCarbon Disulfide 61-129 7.3 20
0.049 99.81070.0530.050mg/KgCarbon Tetrachloride 64-143 6.7 20
0.048 96.699.00.0490.050mg/KgChlorobenzene 74-118 2.4 20
0.052 10499.20.0490.050mg/KgChlorodibromomethane 73-122 4.9 20
0.047 94.698.80.0490.050mg/KgChloroethane 33-149 4.3 20
0.046 93.099.60.0490.050mg/KgChloroform 73-127 6.8 20
0.052 1051010.0500.050mg/KgChloromethane 45-143 4.2 20
0.046 92.098.60.0490.050mg/Kg2-Chlorotoluene 67-124 6.9 20
0.046 92.098.60.0490.050mg/Kg4-Chlorotoluene 71-126 6.9 20
0.048 96.098.60.0490.050mg/KgDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)59-159 2.6 20
0.056 1121040.0520.050mg/Kg1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 55-157 7.5 20
0.051 10397.60.0480.050mg/Kg1,2-Dibromoethane 70-132 5.3 20
0.049 99.698.80.0490.050mg/KgDibromomethane 74-133 0.8 20
0.050 10198.60.0490.050mg/Kg1,2-Dichlorobenzene 72-123 2.2 20
0.047 94.897.20.0480.050mg/Kg1,3-Dichlorobenzene 71-120 2.5 20
0.047 95.497.20.0480.050mg/Kg1,4-Dichlorobenzene 71-123 1.8 20
0.041 83.095.80.0470.050mg/KgDichlorodifluoromethane 26-146 14.3 20
Page 30 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 59 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V29103QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035
QC Prep:V29102
LCS-V29102 LCSD-V29102Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
0.047 94.21020.0510.050mg/Kg1,1-Dichloroethane 74-127 7.9 20
0.050 1001040.0510.050mg/Kg1,2-Dichloroethane 68-128 3.7 20
0.045 91.699.20.0490.050mg/Kg1,1-Dichloroethene 67-149 7.9 20
0.047 95.499.60.0490.050mg/Kgcis-1,2-Dichloroethene 76-134 4.3 20
0.047 94.41010.0500.050mg/Kgtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 73-132 6.5 20
0.049 98.41040.0510.050mg/Kg1,2-Dichloropropane 73-130 5.3 20
0.050 1021050.0520.050mg/Kg1,3-Dichloropropane 75-124 2.9 20
0.047 94.01030.0510.050mg/Kg2,2-Dichloropropane 50-142 9.1 20
0.048 96.61050.0520.050mg/Kg1,1-Dichloropropene 71-130 8.7 20
0.051 1041050.0520.050mg/Kgcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 71-125 0.7 20
0.054 1081110.0550.050mg/Kgtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 68-123 2.1 20
0.046 92.296.40.0480.050mg/KgEthylbenzene 74-128 4.4 20
0.100 1001010.1010.100mg/KgEthyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (ETBE)70-130 0.9 20
0.045 90.096.00.0480.050mg/KgHexachlorobutadiene 64-125 6.4 20
0.048 96.61040.0520.050mg/Kgn-Hexane 70-130 7.3 20
0.047 95.886.80.0430.050mg/Kg2-Hexanone 61-157 9.8 20
0.046 93.497.20.0480.050mg/KgIsopropylbenzene 68-126 3.9 20
0.046 93.499.00.0490.050mg/Kg4-Isopropyl toluene 68-129 5.8 20
0.046 92.091.00.0450.050mg/KgMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)63-149 1.0 20
0.054 1081040.0520.050mg/Kg4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 57-162 4.1 20
0.044 89.894.20.0470.050mg/KgMethylene Chloride 74-129 4.7 20
0.051 1031010.0500.050mg/KgNaphthalene 57-157 1.5 20
0.046 93.098.60.0490.050mg/Kgn-Propylbenzene 67-130 5.8 20
0.050 1001010.0500.050mg/KgStyrene 77-121 1.3 20
0.044 89.094.40.0470.050mg/Kg1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 72-115 5.8 20
0.049 98.298.20.0490.050mg/Kg1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 56-126 0.0 20
Page 31 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 60 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V29103QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035
QC Prep:V29102
LCS-V29102 LCSD-V29102Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
0.045 90.497.20.0480.050mg/KgTetrachloroethene 68-130 7.2 20
0.047 95.41010.0500.050mg/KgToluene 71-129 6.0 20
0.048 97.499.00.0490.050mg/Kg1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 68-130 1.6 20
0.048 97.81050.0520.050mg/Kg1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 66-125 7.4 20
0.046 92.898.20.0490.050mg/Kg1,1,1-Trichloroethane 67-131 5.6 20
0.048 97.01020.0510.050mg/Kg1,1,2-Trichloroethane 70-133 5.4 20
0.047 94.41010.0500.050mg/KgTrichloroethene 75-133 6.7 20
0.045 91.81020.0510.050mg/KgTrichlorofluoromethane 44-146 10.5 20
0.053 10798.80.0490.050mg/Kg1,2,3-Trichloropropane 60-137 8.3 20
0.047 94.699.20.0490.050mg/Kg1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 69-129 4.7 20
0.046 93.697.80.0480.050mg/Kg1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 69-128 4.3 20
0.045 91.497.80.0480.050mg/KgVinyl Acetate 60-140 6.7 20
0.044 89.01000.0500.050mg/KgVinyl Chloride 48-147 11.8 20
0.045 91.297.80.0480.050mg/Kgo-Xylene 74-126 6.9 20
0.094 94.699.00.0990.100mg/Kgm,p-Xylene 75-124 4.5 20
99.61034-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
105108Dibromofluoromethane (S)84-123
98.4102Toluene-d8 (S)76-129
Page 32 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 61 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V29139QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035
QC Prep:V29138
Associated Lab Samples: 97929
LRB-V29138 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/23/23 10:310.0050.0006<0.0006mg/KgMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
01/23/23 10:314-Bromofluorobenzene (S)102 70-130
01/23/23 10:31Dibromofluoromethane (S)110 70-130
01/23/23 10:31Toluene-d8 (S)98.4 76-129
LCS-V29138 LCSD-V29138Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
0.051 1021000.0500.050mg/KgMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)70-130 1.9 20
99.61034-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
105108Dibromofluoromethane (S)70-130
98.4102Toluene-d8 (S)76-129
Page 33 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 62 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Massachusetts EPH
MADEP-EPH
V29194QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
MAEPH (Prep)
QC Prep:V29150
Associated Lab Samples: 97928, 97930
LRB-V29150 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/26/23 13:1535028.2<28.2µg/LAliphatic C9-C18
01/26/23 13:15500124<124µg/LAliphatic C19-C36
01/26/23 13:1525061.2<61.2µg/LAromatic C11-C22
01/26/23 13:152-Fluorobiphenyl (S)121 40-140
01/26/23 13:152-Bromonaphthalene (S)120 40-140
01/26/23 13:15Chlorooctadecane (S)89.0 40-140
01/26/23 13:15OTP Surrogate (S)103 40-140
LCS-V29150 LCSD-V29150Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
470 78.373.1439600µg/LAliphatic C9-C18 40-140 6.8 50.0
734 91.791.1729800µg/LAliphatic C19-C36 40-140 0.6 50.0
2120 12511619701700µg/LAromatic C11-C22 40-140 7.3 50.0
1251242-Fluorobiphenyl (S)40-140
1261262-Bromonaphthalene (S)40-140
83.589.5Chlorooctadecane (S)40-140
108105OTP Surrogate (S)40-140
Page 34 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 63 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Massachusetts VPH
MADEP-VPH
V29086QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
MAVPH (Prep)
QC Prep:V29085
Associated Lab Samples: 97929
LRB-V29085 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/23/23 10:198.001.22<1.22mg/KgAliphatic C5-C8
01/23/23 10:198.004.56<4.56mg/KgAliphatic C9-C12
01/23/23 10:198.000.624<0.624mg/KgAromatic C9-C10
01/23/23 10:192,5-Dibromotoluene (FID) (S)80.1 70-130
01/23/23 10:192,5-Dibromotoluene (PID) (S)78.5 70-130
LCS-V29085 LCSD-V29085Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
36.3 11311135.432.0mg/KgAliphatic C5-C8 70-130 2.5 50
38.0 11911637.232.0mg/KgAliphatic C9-C12 70-130 2.1 50
13.0 12112012.810.7mg/KgAromatic C9-C10 70-130 1.5 50
78.875.72,5-Dibromotoluene (FID) (S)70-130
77.077.02,5-Dibromotoluene (PID) (S)70-130
Page 35 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 64 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
QC Prep Batch Method:
Massachusetts VPH
MADEP-VPH
V29105QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
MAVPH (Prep)
QC Prep:V29104
Associated Lab Samples: 97928, 97930
LRB-V29104 Matrix: AQULab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
01/24/23 10:2950.011.5<11.5µg/LAliphatic C5-C8
01/24/23 10:2950.025.8<25.8µg/LAliphatic C9-C12
01/24/23 10:2950.04.02<4.02µg/LAromatic C9-C10
01/24/23 10:292,5-Dibromotoluene (FID) (S)88.5 70-130
01/24/23 10:292,5-Dibromotoluene (PID) (S)86.6 70-130
LCS-V29104 LCSD-V29104Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
336 112111333300µg/LAliphatic C5-C8 70-130 0.8 50.0
353 118119356300µg/LAliphatic C9-C12 70-130 0.8 50.0
117 117115115100µg/LAromatic C9-C10 70-130 1.7 50.0
87.185.42,5-Dibromotoluene (FID) (S)70-130
79.978.92,5-Dibromotoluene (PID) (S)70-130
Page 36 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 65 of 68
Quality Control Data
23-020-0001Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:CES Group
Snyders Phillips 66
Dry Weight Determination
SW-DRYWT
V29080QC Analytical Batch:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
V 98020-DUPDuplicate
Max RPD
Parameter
AnalyzedRPDDUP
Result
Result
Units
20.0 01/23/23 10:001.612.112.3%Moisture
V 98021-DUPDuplicate
Max RPD
Parameter
AnalyzedRPDDUP
Result
Result
Units
20.0 01/23/23 10:003.912.513.0%Moisture
Page 37 of 37Date:02/01/2023 03:35 PM
Page 66 of 68
Fed Ex
UPS
US Postal
Client
Lab
Courier
Other :
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number:
Customer Name:
Report Number:23-020-0001
CES Group
00012
Shipping Method
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
Thermometer ID:IRT15 1.0C
Chain of Custody (COC) present?Yes No
Yes No Not Present
Yes No Not Present
Yes No
COC agrees with sample label(s)? Yes No
COC properly completed
Samples in proper containers?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
All samples received within holding time?
Cooler temperature in compliance?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes NoCooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
Yes No
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/ASoil VOA method 5035 – compliance criteria met
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
Water - VOA vials free of headspace Yes No N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
High concentration pre-weighed (methanol -14 d) Low conc pre-weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
High concentration container (48 hr)
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Number of coolers/boxes received
Yes No
1
Signature:Angelo Norvell Date & Time:01/20/2023 10:01:44
Special precautions or instructions included?
Comments:
Page 67 of 68
Page 68 of 68

APPENDIX E

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
AND NCDEQ WELL PERMIT

Facing west with the former UST system located between the Creston Superette sign (right) and
onsite building (left)

Facing east with the former UST system located between the Creston Superette sign (left) and
onsite building (right)

Adjoining property to the east of the Creston Superette

North Fork New River to the south of the Creston Superette

Adjoining property to the west of the Creston Superette

Location of soil boring / temporary groundwater monitoring well MW-1 with the NC Highway 88
West and the property to the north of the Creston Superette in the background

Additional view of soil boring / temporary monitoring well MW-1 located along the north side wall
of the previously over-excavated area

View of onsite diesel AST and fuel dispenser located immediately east-northeast of the onsite
building

View of onsite water supply well (not in use) located off the northwestern corner of the onsite
building

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD (GW-1)

4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
5a. Well Location:
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
Physical Address, City, and Zip
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
5b. Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees: (if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
N W
6.Is(are) the well(s): Permanent or Temporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: Yes or No
If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8.For Geoprobe/DPT or Closed-Loop Geothermal Wells having the same construction, only 1 GW-1 is needed. Indicate TOTAL NUMBER of wellsdrilled:
9. Total well depth below land surface: (ft.) For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200’ and 2@100′)
10.Static water level below top of casing: (ft.) If water level is above casing, use “+”
11. Borehole diameter: (in.)
12.Well construction method: (i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
22.Certification:
Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23.Site diagram or additional well details: You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or wellconstruction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following:
Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address(es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the county health department of the county where constructed.
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources Revised 6-6-2018
Print Form
For Internal Use Only:
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test:
13b. Disinfection type: Amount:
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Carolina Soil Investigations, LLC
Company Name
2.Well Construction Permit #: List all applicable well construction permits (i.e. UIC, County, State, Variance, etc.)
3.Well Use (check well use):
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-cased wells) OR LINER (if applicable)FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING (geothermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in.
ft. ft. in.
Water Supply Well:
Municipal/Public
Residential Water Supply (single)
Residential Water Supply (shared)
Wells > 100,000 GPD
Agricultural
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply)
Industrial/Commercial Irrigation
17. SCREENFROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in.
ft. ft. in.
18. GROUTFROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
Non-Water Supply Well:
Monitoring Recovery
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
Injection Well: Aquifer Recharge Groundwater Remediation
Aquifer Storage and Recovery Salinity Barrier
Aquifer Test Stormwater Drainage
Experimental Technology Subsidence Control
Geothermal (Closed Loop) Tracer
Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) Other (explain under #21 Remarks)
ft. ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable) FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary) FROM TO DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soil/rock type, grain size, etc.)
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
21. REMARKS
1.Well Contractor Information:
___________________________________________________________
Well Contractor Name

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality | Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office | 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 | Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

January 17, 2023
Mr. Scott Ryals
NCDEQ – DWM UST Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699

SUBJECT: MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NO. WM0401424
COUNTY: Davidson
FILE NAME: Snyder’s Phillips 66

Dear Mr. Ryals:

In accordance with your application received on January 13, 2023, we are forwarding herewith:

1. Monitoring Well Construction Permit No. WM0401424 for the construction of one (1)
monitoring well at 823 West Center Street in Lexington in Davidson County.

Henceforth, correspondence and data relating to this well shall be designated as specified in the
subject heading above. This Permit will be effective from the date of issuance and shall be subject
to the conditions and limitations as specified therein. If you have any questions regarding this
permit, please contact me or Jim Gonsiewski at [phone].

Sincerely,

Jennifer F. Graznak
Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ - WSRO

cc: Harold & Betty Ruth Myers (Electronic Copy)
Greg Hans – CES Group Engineers, LLP (Electronic Copy)

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality | Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office | 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 | Raleigh, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES – WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS
SECTION

PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MONITORING WELL

In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87, North Carolina General Statutes, and
other applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations.

PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO

NCDEQ – DWM UST Section

FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MONITOR WELL SYSTEM consisting of one (1)
monitoring well owned by the NCDEQ – DWM UST Section. The well will be located at 823
West Center Street in Lexington, North Carolina, in Davidson County. This Permit is issued in
accordance with the application received on January 13, 2023 in conformity with specifications
and supporting data, all of which are filed with the Department of Environmental Quality and are
considered integral parts of this Permit.

This Permit is for well construction only, and does not waive any provision or requirement of any
other applicable law or regulation. Construction of any well under this Permit shall be in strict
compliance with the North Carolina Well Construction Regulations and Standards (15A NCAC
02C .0100), and other State and Local Laws and regulations pertaining to well construction.

If any requirements or limitations specified in this Permit are unacceptable, you have a right to an
adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days of receipt of this Permit. The request
must be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this Permit is final and binding.

This Permit will be effective for one year from the date of its issuance and shall be subject to other
specified conditions, limitations, or exceptions as follows:

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality | Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office | 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 | Raleigh, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

1. Issuance of this Permit does not obligate reimbursement from State trust funds, if these
wells are being installed as part of an investigation for contamination from an underground
storage tank or dry cleaner incident.
2. Issuance of this Permit does not supersede any other agreement, permit, or requirement
issued by another agency.
3. The well(s) shall be located and constructed as shown on the attachments submitted as part
of the Permit application.
4. Each well shall have a Well Contractor Identification Plate in accordance with 15A NCAC
02C .0108(o).
5. Well construction records (GW-1) for each well shall be submitted to the Division of Water
Resources’ Information Processing Unit within 30 days of the well completion.
6. When the well is discontinued or abandoned, it shall be abandoned in accordance with 15A
NCAC 02C .0113 and a well abandonment record (GW-30) shall be submitted to the
Division of Water Resources’ Information Processing Unit within 30 days of the well
abandonment.
7. The County Health Department may require a county monitoring well construction permit.
Please contact the health department for their requirements.

Permit issued the 17th day of January, 2023

FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION

_______________________________________________
Jennifer F. Graznak, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ - WSRO

By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit No. # WM0401424