Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCD980602163_19840921_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_Public Affairs Officer letter to Henderson Dispatch-OCRSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESO~RCES 32!5 NORTH SALISBURY STREET JAMES B. HUNT. JR. RALEIGH 27611 SARAH T. MORROW, M.D .. M.P.H. GOVERNOR Mr. Bill Dennis, Jr., Managing Editor Henderson Dispatch Post Office Box 908 Henderson, North Carolina 27536 Dear Mr. Dennis: SECRETARY TELEPHONE 919/7SS-4SS4 The current campaign for the United States Senate ~etween Governor Jim Hunt and Senator Jesse Helms has brought the issue of PCB's oack into the headlines. For several months, I have watched as -one person after ~nother accuses Governor Hunt of having "allowed toxic material, PCB, to lie along our roads for four years" and then "dumping the PCB in Warren County." · I This is a misleading and inaccurate oversimplifica~ion of a very complicated issue. 0 would like to present the facts surrounding t ~e PCB controversy in order to set the record str~ight~ North Carolinci"o.fficials were first informed of po ~sible PCB contamination along a Warren County roadside on July 30, 1978. (we illl11ediately sent chemists and environmental engineers to the site to determine just hqw large of an area was contaminated and in what concentrations~ After three days, we had identified more than 240 mil es of roadsides in 14 counties where PCB-1 aced oil had been deliberately and illegally dumped. . Health and environmental officials met and decided ~nan imnediate ~t>s~f;y solution to i111110bilize the PCB's by placing activated cal~bon and asphalt(on top of · ~,}--es the PCB's to prevent the contamination from spreading an 1 d to minimize any threat to public health. This action was t,ken less than three we,eks after we received the first report of PCB contamination~ I (once we were as~ured that the PCB was not~g to Eigrate off-site, and later sampling in 1982 demonstrated that it did notJ we startetl work on a long-term solution. (Qur first choice was to treat the contaminated soil in place, bu~ the federal Env1ronmental Protection Agency, ()lhich had to approve whatever solution we came up with} decided that in .. place treatment was too experimental and too risky. t-l " . .}...... We tthe~')considereq the option of picking up the con ~aminated soil and burning it at an incinerator.g..;R,owever, the amount of soil involt,ted made')that option ~$ practically impossible and too expensive. " The only remaining course open to us at that time was to pick up the more than 50,000 tons of soil and place it in a secure, well-designed landfill. We surveyed more than 90 potential landfill -sites in the 14 affected counties. We narrowed the choice to six sites and selected the one in Warren County because it met all .of EPA's technical requirements and it was available. We were prepared to build the landfill and start mo ~ing the soil in the fall of 1979, but before we could begin construction a temporary restraining order was issued and a lawsuit filed by local officials and re'Side ~ts of Warren County -,_•·\ __ _, --,.~ Q"hat lawsuit;, which prohibited us from taking action to solve the problem.J dragged --· :, on for two years before it was dismissed by a federal di strict court judge. His decision was appea 1 ed. 1 __ ~ 0~~ nee Warren County officials were assured that ~ver~1precaution was being taken to ma ·e the 1 andfi 11 safe, the appea 1 was dropped.) ~s sqon as) the appea 1 was dropped - we were able to move forward with construction of the landfill and clean-up of the soil. (_Follow-up testing showed that all of the contamin~ted soil was removed from the roadsides·) . . A ¼luring that time)we also vigorously pursued thec{r~~~~~~~n of the men responsible for dumping the PCB-laced oil along the road sides. (Jhey were convicted of criminal charges;·: two received active jail tenns, two 1received probation. We are conti-nuing legal action against these men in an effo11t to recover the cost of the clean-up. · We also continue to closely monitor the landfill inJWarren County.{ We conduct monthly and twice-yearly inspections~ To date, all of or inspections have shown absolutely no leakage of PCB from the landfill. (We will continue to monitor the . landfill regularly in the future :, / Bear in mind -that all of the decisions concerning ~~e PCB landfill were made not by one individual, but by teams of state and federal ~nvironmental and health) experts and by the courts. If the finger of blame must ~e pointed . tt should .be (e_ointed)not at the state or the governor, but at the men !responsible for the contamination. Sincerely, ~~?t!j/ Lee Mi ttel stadtf Public Affairs Officer Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch 919/733~4471 I