NCD980602163_19830901_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_Crime Control & Public Safety Final Report-OCR

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CRIME CONTROL
AND PUBLIC SAFETY
FINAL REPORT
PCB WASTE DISPOSAL SITE
WARREN COUNTY, N.C.
SEPTEMBER, 1983
Prepared By:
SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
FINAL REPORT
PCB WASTE DISPOSAL SITE
WARREN COUNTY
Introduction
The decision to remove the approximately 40,000 cubic yards of PCB
contaminated soil along public roads by the state of North Carolina was based
upon the ~vailability of a se~ure disposal facility. Such a facility is
regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) administered by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency.
The State of North Carolina applied for permission to utilize a 140-acre
tract of land, owned by the State and located in Warren County, to construct,
operate, and maintain an Annex II PCB Landfill. The site and operational
plans were approved conditionally by the Environmental Protection Agency in
correspondence dated June 4, 1979. Additional conditions were added on
December 14, 1981.
Pre-Operation Phase Activities
The North Carolina Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch was chosen
by the PCB Remedial Action Project coordinators in the Department of Crime
, Control and Public Safety to ensure construction and environmental monitoring
compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency's approval conditions.
This was made clear in a pre-construction meeting located at the site on June
10, 1982. '
Of primary importance in pre-operation activities was the establishment of
background data on groundwater and surface water around the site. This is
imperative for any long-term environmental monitoring program associated with
such disposal facilities. The initial groundwater monitoring wells were
constructed according to the Environmental Protection Agency approved
standards when general site construction started (June 21, 1982). These wells
were found to be unsatisfactory by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management and replacement wells were installed, with the
Environmental Protection Agency's approval the first week of July. One of
these replacement wells was vandalized on August 5, 1982, and was again
reinstalled. The Environmental Protection Agency stated that the "closing
out" of unusable groundwater monitoring using cement would not jeopardize the
collection of representative groundwater samples from monitoring wells in the
immediate vicinity. Groundwater and surface water background chemical data
was collected using the Environmental Protection Agency-approved methodologies
and analytical techniques (see attachment I).
Vandals damaged the 30-mil PVC liner on August 21 or August 22, 1983.
Repairs were made and certified by a representative of the liner supplier.
The Environmental Protection Agency inspected the repair work on August 27,
1982, and gave verbal approval at that time to continue construction.
Inspections by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management to
ensure compliance with North Carolina Sedimentation and Erosion Control Laws
were conducted on August 3, 1982, and August 25, 1982 (see attachments II and
III).
Measurements of in-place saturated hydraulic conductivities of the clay
liner were taken on September 12, 1982, in accordance with Environmental
Protection Agency permit conditions. All measurements showed the liner to
meet or exceed regulatory requirement (see attachment IV).
Operation Phase Activities
Placement of the contaminated soil into the prepared landfill commenced on
September 15, 1982. The last load of contaminated soil was delivered on
~~~~~1~, 1982. The total ~olume of contaminated soil was estimated at just
unler t e ~rejected 40,000 cubic yards. An attempt to calculate the average
concentrations of PCB in the contaminated soil was made on October 7, 1982,
following advice given by Mr. Ralph Jennings, Toxic Substances Section,
Environmental Protection Agency. Composite samples were collected at six
locations in the contaminated soil fill. Each sample consisted of a composite
of material from six foot deep borings. The average concentration of PCB's in
the landfill as determined by the October 7, 1982, sampling event was 135 ppm
(see attachment V).
Operational phase monitoring of groundwater, surface water, and surface
water sediments was conducted on October 5, 1982, and October 28, 1982 (see
attachment I).
Post-Operational Phase Activities
Final placement of the topsoil covering over the clay and PVC cap was
impeded by wet weather conditions. The North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management inspected the landfill for compliance with erosion
control regulations on November 5, 1982 and November 17, 1982 (see attachment
II). The lack of an adequate stabilized topsoil cover resulted in the
uncovering of the PVC cap due to accelerated erosion during January, 1983.
The lack of the topsoil covering's weight on the PVC cap allowed decomposition
gases to accumulate in bubbles under the PVC cap instead of being forced
through the gas vent located at a single location at the center of the
landfill. These bubbles were pierced and temporary venting pipes installed to
prevent gas buildup until weather conditions allowed the contractor to repair
the PVC cap and finish the placement of topsoil.
Analyses of gases venting from the single permanent vent and the temporary
vents by the North Carolina Department of Human Resources and the United
States Environmental Protection Agency showed them to consist primarily of
methane with concentrations of PCB's fAr below OSHA standards.
Post-operational phase environmental monitoring of groundwater, surface
water, and surface water sediments was permformed on November 29, 1982, and
May 16, 1983. Identical monitoring events will occur each November and May
until the United States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Administrator
and appropriate authorities of North Carolina determine otherwise.
The pumping of the landfill's ieachate collection system to remove
rainwater that accumulated during the operational phase commenced on March 7,
1983. Over 5,000 gallons of water were removed and treated in the site's
treatment works by june 1, 1983. Any effluent from the treatment works met
the Environmental Protection Agency's drinking water standards for PCB's.
2
Final construction of the landfill was completed on July 14, 1983. The
State of North Carolina accepted the site conditionally on July 15, 1983. All
keys to locks at the facility are in the custody of the North Carolina Solid
and Hazardous Waste Management Branch.
The Environmental Protection Agency permit conditions identifying
post-closure maintenance of the PCB landfill specify monthly inspections of
the physical structures at the landfill and the leachate collection/detection
sumps in addition to the twice a year environmental monitoring program. The
Solid and Hazardous Waste Man~gement Branch retains responsibility for these
actions until directed otherwise by the Secretary of the Department of Human
Resources.
3
Attachment I
Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H.
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
P.O. Box 2091
Raleigh, N.C. 27 602-2091
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I I!
!
O. W. Strickland, Head
June 30, 1983
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Environmental Health Section
Thomas C. Karnoski, Environmental Engineer )C~
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Environmental Health Section
Environmental Monitoring of the PCB Disposal _Facility
ST ATE HEAL TH DIRECTOR
Environmental monitoring of the PCB disposal facility to identify releases
from the landfill consists of select sampling and ·analyses of groundwater,
surface water, -and surface water sediments. Analytical parameters dictated
by EPA are pH, specific conductivity, and total PCB for groundwater and
surface water and total PCB for surface water sediments. All sampling,
analytical, ·and ·security chatn ·af· custody procedures rigidly follow EPA
and N. C. Division of Health Services accepted methodologies.
Locations of the four groundwater monitoring wells were designated by EPA
as were the four surface water and surface water sediment sampling points
(see attachment).
The following identifies the dates that environmental monitoring events took
place:
Pre-Operation Monitoring of Grormdwater to Determine Background Quality
..
August 20, 1982
August 30, 1982
September 6, 1982
Pre-Operational Monitoring of Surface Water and Surface Water Sediments
to Determine Background Quality
July 7, 1982
August 3, 1982
August 10, 198-2
Operational Phase Monitoring of Groundwater, Surface Water and Surface
Water Sediments
October 5, 1982
October 28, 1982
Memorandum
:'->~e 2
June 30, 1983
Attachment I
Post-Operational Phase Monitoring of Groundwater, Surface Water, and Surface
Water Sediments (to occur indefinitely twice each year)
November 29, 1982
May ·· 16, 1983
I II
To date, all monitoring activity has indicated no release of PCB's are
occurring at the disposal facility. All analytical data is available as
a part of public record.
A functional aspect of the landfill's design is a mechanism to remove free
liquid from the waste mass and hence eliminate material that has migration
(or release)potential. Pumping of the leachate collection system commenced
on March 7, 1983 and continued at various intervals through June 1, 1983. 1
Approximately 5,000 gallons of free liquids were removed from the landfill
and treated at the· iandfill's treatment works. Below are dates where water
analytical work was .conducted on influent and effluent water of the treat-
ment system:
March 7, 11, 14, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 30
April 1, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 27
·May 10, 25
June 1 . --. --·· ...:~_~·: ......... -... ---·· .. ·-·-... --.
The highest concentration of PCB's detected in the influent water was 2.47
ppb /J..47 (10-7)% by weight]. All effluent analyses show PCB concentrations
less than .1 ppb L).(10-)% by weight]. Attached are allowable concentrations
of PCB's in food and feed products according to 29 CFR 109(B). Effluent from
the treatment works meets EPA drinking water standards.
over fifty-five private drinking water wells from residents in the area around
the landfill were sampled in January of 1983. All analytical data showed no
detectable levels of PCB's.
TCK:ct
Attachments
.,. . . ' Attachment II
WIDFILL INS?EC"!!C21 RZP03.!
..
e
.
Pc o · '--A-· Nlf1 '-'-· 1.0C:..!..TIC)i: Srz. f(oo4 (~
RES?O~SIBU::. --· comh ! : -CITY OR TO'..lN ------------------
S ?7?5"l-G,o ✓ ~llN, C' .:...£:3. ( SP:C:CIFY)
;I'···.
l. · \las erosion a:id sediment control plan pre;,ared? ✓yes ___ no, if yes,
2 •
3.
I+.
. • •y . • •• ••• •• I •
l:hom ·-SVE,t<-DuP · + P~L
~as plan.revieYedby Land Quality Sectio:l prior to initiation of landfill opeI ... v_ :··. ___ y~ .no ·
Is_ the plan prese~tly being follo-wed? V:~s no
Has plan be~n~~i~6wed at anytime prior ~o ~nspec_t_i-on_?_ ~:s ___ no
-,,: ... ~ ... ·•··. ·. .·. .. (::-· ,.. . . . . . . .
5. If plan has _been followed previously and tle',,1 is not being followed, explain as
Yby an~:'~~w.:. 0 ~~~~s responsible?. rJffe-; :.,>:, '.: '·?t-;/;:·\·::)?:~i,":::· . . _______ ,..._.. _____________ _
·'·. -------------------------------------'.. :.-. ·: . -:: ·•:-. :.;?'!( .,' :_~-<Jiit,J? :< ~ :_ ·_. :~::
. ,'·':._-6~-·:s1~e of '.iandfill::;~d details as tc:i exte:: u:der dev~lopment ~t time of inspect . ~---e · ~-·,'l'-~k-:~: -=·--·· ··
. ,.,: .•• .
-;,#•··
Location _of any;~~ all wtercourses th.at could be da..naged by sediment. __ _
:• .. ~. D7db .Jh'-, ·:~:-. ~\J£.,J TYrh.L ~ To 12../ c.H-rJE.CK..-CIZ-fc::-• ~
7 •. Type
µ(l;:.
and extent-of cffsite (beyond prope=cy bounc.a:ies) sedimentation problem:
have ta.k~n ·place or are presently taking place. E:rplain: _ __._~----'---,..J-~--~--rr
•
;
8. H~ve local and state perso~nel resccosi~le for 12.:itfill activities been coope
and d~.oonstrated_ a Yillingness to ~ke ~he p:-og:-a::: su::ceed 7 ~es __ _
J ......... -:-
E:cplain: _·_.-=j:-...:~~M~· -=-··· ... ~------M__,:,..81~&,.;:rJ~·,-c.L....-......;..N-=...A_A-A::..t:._____;;;.=..· __ c>_~ __ ....a:,sS~r-'-_.L ____ ··-· -~~_N_C__..c
· 1:r--r:. · · N -L O:::>f?N£/l. o,:. e,..A-r-J o~u ;J..,ts . &u.tJ
9.
P~lbl?.r'-'\~ C>.
C"rrc::tiv~ .lCtion · needE:d: Sr (.,r: t-=£.,.../c(E A--7:. /JE c,/2N
. ... ~
H-fH, · 'Pfl..,,{_EI&) fi3mAi ::t:-1 s /Al ~1.0 01'-
!'-1A?,,./r£.A/AN(!.L. lrf2.£A rvo/L:rrl or:---Ml-0;1""-C
, 1 .. -~-..,..:.. n ,r; & ,..._, r 0,1? 12...& c~D t" ~ _{ o ,«::-.s-~ llt)i,
.. Attachment II
-2-..
10. R.eccmm.e.ndations; C 4-A-+I o v, S IL,..,-,-kt-Jc~ k Nb I e 0
·•.• ..
.; .... ,,
I J IT'I..~ -#::Cf z4:,vD Ctfl7--.!7? J v£ G ~ NE /ll'f-C.._ 1v1. '47..J7T.,._
Of: D,.;v,c:.es lf:-j 1--4,o~o· ~ . fiL,.sa 191 i'e,Alt::J L't?
/rU.A-,-Jo fl-Ti-I o _,:.. /-h:) l-D./ ,-1~ /Jo At o • ~ca~,!.. € A/D~
v...Jl£U ~:· ·. ;-:lf-0£. rb ('co,-./ ST12-vc77aN r--uPtt4"1TV-JCn,..h
(_;r, ,-,. ~ .L-1 w'~ ll£/2G€~; m..,-) ••ff ~ o 1~,
•
·-~-.... :.:· . ·-·._. '.::~·.:.i.;_.:_-:~.(-.:
--·-•·, -• • .. • • _·1· •. . ·-' . --~ . -·,;. ~ ·.,_. :_ ..... · ..... : ... ~
.. :· ...
. . -· .
. -: ,,.· .
.. .
I --~J::_;;;...j;,=...;;.'.tJ _____ Region
g;-3-sz-Date
.,
e
.
Attachment III
lRiDFILL DiSPEC:!~l ?...::PO?.:r
:: ")rt: __ p~k:~· ~"'--~<-::.!t1..::L,:...::.J!.!::D:..!.F-t~u~\...::..._ __ 1.oc...\.Tr c~: _S""-'--'2-_.J...,;( (o~.oLf:....-.L..l,,(j....;_w~r
RES?O~lSIBLE: __. ..... -co~!. I: ---CITY OR T0'11~ ------------------
l. ~as e~osiori a:i.d sediment control plan pre?a:ed? Vres ___ nc, if yes
~hom ~_~ ___ , ... s~,,,,_.Jf...:aJZ.:=-:;D..;;:u;..i.P__,_4 .. \ _·_1?&-.;_,ft-:...J.12c.....:==~=-l.=----
2. l;as plan revieYed by Land Quality Sect:iC":l prior to ir.itiation cf landfill op1
~s ___ no
3. Is the plan presently beillg followed?
4. ll2.s plan been followed at anytime prier ~o i~pecticn?
~-1/ yes ___ no
5. If plan has be~n followed previously and Il='-1 is not being folloved, explain J
...
why and. how;_ .-Wb~ · is responsible? _____ _..;~-+/....ik:...;._ _________ _
l . . _ .
. . ·, ~-.. _. ·.--·.; :.·=-·1"~· ·.
6. Size ~f · 1andfill, and details as t ·o ex:e::: \!:le.er .cevelopment at time of inspe,
. ,:'.'.:::: % At:.• Qi::H'i.l-~f:,u... E,.-)(.c..f!\) ftTID -f: .dou, ro~ UtJo~ Co b ~-Location of any _and all v.tterccurses th.at could be da.naged by sediment.
7. "Type and extent of offsite (beyo~d prope=-t:y bou.nta.=ies) sed:1.m.entaticn proble
have tak~n place or are p~esently taki~g pl.ace. E.:rplain:
•
8. H~ve local and state personnel respe:si:le for la=.tfill activities been c001
and de~cnstrated a w1111~gness to ~ke ~he prog=z: su:ceed? ~es_
9.
E:cplain: _____________________________ _
Corre:tive ~ction needed:
J '-' Pc""t...( s f+-,-)0 /ofl-
• iL. "D£ 0 ' )...._) o n..::n-/
S 1 <,,.:r: k N ce: A:-::c: h l f. Ccn.....J E.r2. 0 1
Nfr...E;'D OF= r-,mJae,1JtN'C£ , ])1V€g_r-101
/!. "'f-T'E-,.j ~(j ,J O 1!-,.S' I L-1 f€ N ~ S /4 /2../;:
or:=-~1,-G PoN't:>,
, ' ,, -/A/
( Al
S 1t--! .. ~N~i ~ ~ /OC,j:J)tt-e /'hZi'~
o,c-St rz--JV~eo.s 1"7/f7/\/'nrv~CE.
10. Reccmmendatious; _.....1.1_7=-?.=~;__;_=-S--'-/ ..:..N~-..L.-t=f...!.-...:..'1 _ __,!:.D:::::.1!..:_j:...::.C...::<.J~S~J..!:E::;.;,:o=---.:W=:::::::~l...:..n/~
/rT Lt Al(B,f/2.6£.te , ::fl2.
J
Ca,-1:n4-c...r (./V 1nl Cb~~ Co,...;iµbt--v-,Pv.o~"c SA-1=:€;
'n . /tJ.SU/2E. ~ /'""1 hlA.JTE/V,t'/-N'CC-/72'.ru
~ ~:-µ.oR-&.s.r _~ T?> P~V£,J.,-oµ ..r1~
J;e.,::,' ,_.,_ £ ,,A.,r, ,~ n,,o,J.' .. . ---
• I ' • •. • : •• •. •• • -· · _\-:> . :;,,,::J ··-;,:<.·. e -2..S--BZ-Date
q·~ t-8~:'> .T &Po~ -•. ----__ ·.>:.:::/. ~--w rn-/ 'ts ILL. PH-1L . .t-1 PS) C/2..1 #Vt£:,
Co~c.... ~-o-:F\.:,~c. SA-r:-E.N J A-JD ~ ,~~ ~
co ~-,-t.~.S :·:. -~A-D~.-~ ~ ~ . Co~~"it>Q. ... e-zs--<;:z.. •
• •• • _. ',: r .' • •• •
-H-£_ .. t·.JO 1c:.:·Prrc;O -.. ~ -nk..."11 L-JI'--'-· p.JSU<Ur ~
1 1 ! ~ · ···· •.. ~~~ ,e.~_.-r,, a. _ FOU-ov.J r · ..1 P a ~ c-v R
~ ,_._ £..tJ D ~ 0 NS• . .
-~. c.. o · .,_,ti-Jc ,-.; o ~ -r--f-r' . ·-;,Sf re Bt;._ .· .. .:C:---~ -t ~ {? E.Cc.'E.0 ( ,J . it(3o v-r / ~ DlrY S rz,· J::>,e_ ~ IC l'-11A.IE
Cor-\. PC1 Pr-rJc.c ·:,
•
..
' ,. ...
. ·-,. . .. -. . .... · .. ;
,-
. . . Attachment IV
.
SOIL & MATERIAL ENGINEERS INC. ENGINEERING-TESTING-INSPECTION
3109 Spring Forest Road, Box 58069, Raleigh, NC 27658-8069, Phone [phone]
September 14, 1982
I 1:
Sverdr~p & Parcel Associa~es, Inc.
2211 W. Meadowview Road
Suite 114
Greensboro, North Carolina 27409
Attention: Mr. Frank B. Rainey, Jr., P.E.
Subject:
Gentlemen:
Permeability Test Results of
In-Place Clay Liner
PCB Landfill Site
Warren County, North Carolina
S&ME Job No. 053-82-240-A
/
As requested by Sverdrup & Parcel Associates, undisturbed
sample$ were taken of the in-place clay liner at the subject project for
permeability testing. Five (5) ·laboratory permeability tests were ·
performed on representative samples -taken at the locations indicated on
the attached tabulation of test results. Falling head permeability tests .
were performed in accordance with procedures outlined in the Corps of
Engineers Engineering Manual 1110-2-1906, Appendix VII. The tests
reveal that the in-situ clay liner material ha·s permeability values
ranging from 3.0 x 10-8 to 1.0 x 10-7 cm/sec. See attached Tabulation
of Falling Head Permeability test results • •
JRB:mgm
Attachment
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
SOIL & MATERIAL ENGINEERS, INC • .. EB~ing, "'p,...,_i::cE~. c..-:---
Manager Construction Servi s
cc: Secretary of Crime Control and Public Safety
Attention: 'Mr. William Phillips
RALEIGH, GREENSBORO, ASHEVILLE, WILMINGTON, FAYETTEVILLE, CHARLOTTE, NC
SPARTANBURG, COLUMBIA, CHARLESTON, MYRTLE BEACH, SC
ATLANTA, ALBANY, GA-TRI-CITIES, KNOXVILLE, TN-MONTGOMERY, AL-CINCINNATI, OH-ORLANDO, FL
' ..
Attachment IV
TABULATION OF FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST RESULTS
OF IN-PLACE CLAY LINER
PCB LANDFILL SITE
Test Number Test Location Penneability coefficient (cm/se
6.0 X 10 -B L
2
3
4
5
s .
I i l
10035 N
9850 E
10035 N
9750 E
10135 N
9800 E
10320 N
9750 E
10320 N
9850 E
3.6 X 10 -8
1.0 X 10 -7
3.0 X 10 -8
-8 6.6 X 10
,. . .. --
512 N. Solisbury Street
~James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor I fon1c1n R. Clo:k, Sec,et3ry
C-
D
f
y
111 October 11, 1982
Mr. Al Hanke
Environmental Scientist
EPA, Region IV 1 345 Courtland St., NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
Re: Contaminated Soil Concentration
PCB Landfill
Warren County, NC
Dear Al:
Enclo.sed-:--ts -a copy of .the. state analysis of the six soil
samples taken from the landfill on October 5, 1982.
WWPjr:jj
Enc.
cc: 0. W. Strickland/
Bi 11 Raney
Joe Lennon
Frank B. Rainey, Jr.
Si n,cere ly, ~ /Pf j~h-1 '~-
wi11iam W. Phillips, r .
Assistant to the Secretary
: .·
·1 ·
' .... , ..
. • -~
ALi.ttdtwt:ui. ¥ :.~ .. Nortli _Carolir1:._ t,~.-•~i::-tment o .. Hu::: .. n R<.::.;u-,.:.,.,_
·, Division c i. tit::c:1lth Services
;:; .. Oc:c:upational Health Laborr.tory
~-· .-·:·~--~~4~:.··::·~ .. ::~=!! .. :·.:"·•:". ~~-:::.
: ._--.::: .. ANALYSIS REPORT ... ··:: .
Company:·_·.·_.··~_-__ ...;..fi_c_l3 __ l_,_a..L:t'.J:...:...::::0;.::..~_;_~·-=-l·=l-· ___ ·_-__ ·· __ · _.·, _···· _____________ _
·, ...
Add res s0
: -____ .,;.:_--!kU~~ou.f?~/(~£_:.,IV=:_ _ __:_·, G✓.~::...• -------------------------w,:: ..... ~-.-:-~J.l! : . .. ~-' ,,. :-:1 •.• ..:. ~ :~... j . • .... ---•• --
~e :~ice Reque!ted: ·/Jc~.)]'·"•: __ ·····•• ..
:.··-.~~:i1/~-~kcn -~~~-{Js}_;i .. ;._~-,i. . .. ·····.· Iiy:_L_ fAR/\.JDSP-.... ··-~-~
.-: , s-~\,;,~ ~-,~-~-~~ To·:-~·~ ~~~~-~ryO~ ;"·'~-.,~;lil<t 2 ... --.... _. ·--·-=··. 'o•;:·~-~-·r t'tiR ~VSKj _________ _
::. ~~:~c:~:z.-:~~;i'J=-:;.: ~/4-;;;· ::.,2,;~ ~/,i;!J,-;,_; . . --.. ----·-. D.t ~ Repomd; ~"E/4:/v-... ----
.~~~~ ;~~l!{~~;;~ ::.~;~=·JJ;;J: ~r;.·~ 11&_..t~;--~U-& .. -.. ··-··· --...... ---·••···-· -------:~:;;·-
-. -:··_.--~.-;; ... !~_-._·,_:_f .. ·~:-~_;~:-;f:_;.~ •. !r~;_;.J_·.· .. _<;t:_~-~-.... ~---.~---<.~/. · ·,_;_· __ :·:;-~_-__ :{i:-_-', .. :.~. ·,." .. > _1-,., . · ·_-.. ·~_-. . .. _· .. ; \-· . . ..•..
f.;:;, __ : ...... p,•I.,o N..,.r:·-e•-.. ~-) ·' .. ~ .. ,-~~,c:-,.,-L · -i:.':.·0t-. ---·-~-,:,! 1 : · ·. • 'i°f::.'.?r'•;:-.:r:-:._··_ti;~-_) 7 3:J· ·,? r :;--:;;-,: ·-: ;·.· · .. ;-:.~-.. • ·-.:·~ :. ~.. . . . . .. -""'-...... ~-:·.:~-~:-----·~:-~., ···-· ......• ___;,,.,;........,:..:... .....
-·····.? fj ·-----... -. . I //,/), ~
I --___ _.._._ ··•-· ....
•... t.
,. ·----:_t ·f: .;··.~ '
·•· .. :·: ..
' .. ··: .....
.• r.•,:• ··.
. . . . -------····•·• ...."': ........ , .· .. ·•••-.... ,; , ... . . . . -······-· ··--·'!. .... ···--·--·-· : ;, ... : . ! ~ :,. ...: ., t :;
,(
CuHHENTS:
' ....
f'.tu er A:"S -e .. :. :·: · J.U~
REPORT ED BY i}IY)~·i:\ /: ~:
Chief, Occupa ·onal Health Lab
•.
0
Attachment VI
l...\;.'\""D:'Ill UiS?EC:!G1 ~O?.!
!.0C.A'!IC);: 3cf2
R.ES?O~SIBLE: Cc com;! ! : CITY OR TCT,,'N -------
-~-r ..... A::TI...;......;....-__,;G:>=-_v~._ ~ (S?~CI~)
1. ~as erosion a:id sediment control plan p=e?arec? __ V_yes ___ no, if yes, c
. ' <;vE.1Lt>,....,p i+ P~C'-L
2. l~as plan revie~ed by Land Quality Sectic::r. prior to kitiation cf landfill oper2
__ ~_yes ___ no
3. Is the plan presently beitlg followed? ~ no ------
4. · Has plan been follo-wed at anytime prior ~o i.:1.Spectio:i? L...--'yes no , .. ·:-------.. . . '.j
5. · If plan has been_ followed previously and n='-1 is not being followed, explain as
•,·· -'· -~:. ~·
-why and ho·w.·-Whois responsible? -----~--,/.__fr_· ____________ _
;'">:.;: . -.
6 •. Size of land.fill and details as to exte=-= l!:!lc5.er c.eve'lopment at ti.!ne of i!!.specti ------=-----------·--.
Location of any a~d all vatercourses th.£t could be d2.1n.aged by sedilllent. ---
7. · Type and extent of offsite (beyond prope:-cy bou.::ic.a.:-ies) sedimentation problems
have tak~n place or are p::::esently tak.i:l; p!..ace. E.::rplain.: __ t.J_0_.....,_~-----
I>
8. H~ve local and state perso~nel respc~s~:~e fo= la.::tfill activities been coopeI
V yes __ _
Explain:
. 9. C~rrc:tive ~ction needed: ___ $11...:-==..;:,-:.._ __ Ef:J......L~,,-..,c,.=-~--=S=---~N--'6:.=-=~=0:;;__Uc...,,,c,&..e~/lr-,;:..;...s:,(.,_77.'--
(.-\. An ,J-r. "'r lo'= ~ ~,..,, ' ,.J I I ft-n-bu ,-/ t) f?f £., ,_. ~ T£/l. of!-PI'-'-A,,-o
Vfrl.Aovr I eu;-3:::zoc:'t
~ ---......
... fiLLdl....J.UUcu.1.. -2-
. SEC
10. R.ectmrmendations; __ fr~'.:-..a . .__'7_~,----~G:,::...._,.._,_~~,,_,A_~_r:__ ___ c..n,,,,,, ___ ~_--_r.:...__Ci_o~>J~~:..:::'-::::_ __
f'u Clc.-tc
r;::&..f:I C..1 £tr c_ I f J
____ / l.__-_,>=---_8_~ ___ Date
. . ·-·-:,.
~ I l-I 7 --8''2..., .._)o c..4+AlJC::>C. . . · .. ✓
Y'-'l A-oL ~C.Or-,./""'-f.r> ()~•
-"{"' fu~ -~-~,TI::
\ \ -\~_:·e~_ >: _;: 5-f'~r-.. \.:.-> I i1+ E'I \...L f>H-, u.__1 P~ ~O
.....
· t-1cs-n Ft~ · t-h ~ ---or=-f<u> Cs> u_,._.r · ~ ~ rrr 1n D ~£,,, tJ. ~
I rJ -n+l' :: ~O~• X-ruoTl:.JO ~ L-' ~ \...A..)ll-L
~,...,sf'._~-S _, ~:: _t ,.J . ~o~r ( . _ "--'~E:tc-· ""f"'b __ .. L)(_.11:ft.r-\..,,-)£'
Qor-. f''-' ~c.C .
•
.. ' .'
; : . : : : ..
. :