NCD980602163_19830407_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_Re Warren County PCB Landfill Water Disposal-OCR

·,
North Carolina Department of
. Crime Control ,. a· ~
& Public Safety
512 N. Salisbury Street P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh 27611-7687 [phone]
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor April 7, 1983
MEMORANDUM
TO: 0. W. Strickland -OHR Solid & Hazardous
Waste Branch
-Robert E. Helms -NRCD Division of Environmental
Management
M. C. Adams -DOT
Joe Lennon -Warren County Health Director
FROM: William W. Phillips, Jr_'p./1//fo.
RE: Warren County PCB Landfill Water Disposal
Heman R. Clark, Secretary
Enclosed is a copy of the Leachate Collection and Treatment System
Evaluation Report as prepared by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency. As you can see it is very positive in its conclusions.
Also enclosed are copies of the EPA laboratory data sheets supporting
the results of the water samples taken on March 7 and 8 by EPA officials.
These results had been sent to you on March 10 by Tom Karnoski but without
the accompanying data sheets.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
WWPj r: jj
Enc.
,,ro s r,q,
,...,._:. <""J, ; .ft :, t..:~'v!Z ) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL rF~OTECTION AGENCY
1,,4LeHo,,'-' REGION IV
April 1, 1983
REF: 4AW-E'.R
345 COURTLAND STl !EET
ATLANTA. GEORGIA ::JQ 'jt,5
vJilliam w. Phillips
Assistant to the Secretary
North Ca.colina Cepartment of
Crime Control and Public Safety
P.O. Box 22687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
C€ar Bill:
ram forwarding to you for your files a copy of the Report prepared by
EPA Region IV Environmental Chemist Rod Davis , who evaluated the Leachate
Collection and Treatment System at the PCB Landfill in Warren County, NC
during our March 7-8, 1983 field trip. l\lso enclosed are copies of the
laboratory data sheets showing the analytical r esults of the s ampling
conducted during th(~ first three leachate pumping episodes.
The data for all three of these pumping t ests show that the treat.ncnt
system was effectively removing PCB's from the l eachate and thus the
system appears to be working as designed.
We would like to resample the system in the near future, after several
thousand gallons of leachate have passed t hrough the sys t em, in orde r to
again ve rify the effectiveness of PCB removal fran the l<:~ctchate stream.
We appreciated the ass i s t ance rendered by per sonnel from the NC OHR Solirl
and Hazardous Waste Branch and the NC ror Waste Water Tn:>a tment Plant
operators during this evaluation anrl we l(X)k forward to working with them
again. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not
hesitate t o contact me at (404)881-::>643.
A. R. Hanke
Project Offie<~r
F'.rnergency & Remedi al Response Branch
Enclosures
DATE ·
SLJBJE.CT
FROM
HAR 2s l'l83
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ATHENS, GEORGIA 30613
North Carolina PCB Landfill Collection and Treatment System Evaluation Trip
Report and Data Transmittal
Hazardous Waste Section
Engineering Support Branch
To Al Hanke, Superfund Project Officer
Remedial Action Section, ERRB, AWMD J//Jf'
THRU: M. D. Lair, Chief ES 1/i/ffe ,1 ,-,
Hazardous Waste Section, p~fl EPi-.--i,?,:; U:J l 'I
Michael R. Carter, Chief
Engineering Support Branch, ESD
, P. TL/d:J A, CA.
/. '~---/. ,.--.\ ..... \J ,;_.:. (_'
I accompanied Mr. Al Hanke, Superfund Project Officer for the PCB Landfill
located in Warren County, North Carolina to the site on March 7 and 8, 1983.
The purpose of the visit was to evaluate the effectiveness of the leachate
withdrawal and treatment system that wa s being opera t ed by the North Carolina
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch, Environmental Health Services
Section, North Carolina Department of Human Resources.
The landfill was designed with a leachate collection system as a safety measure
to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure within the landfill. A second
leachate collection system was installed below the clay-liner and plastic liner
which separates the landfill from the natural earth. If any leachate were to
leak through the landfill liners, it would accumulate in the lower sump.
Both sumps are
which connect
connected to a
accessed by inserting PVC pipes into the 6-inch PVC conduits
the sumps with the outside of the landfill. These pipes are
gasoline operated pump which is used to evacuate the sumps.
During this investigation, liquid was found in the upper leachate sump, while
the bottom sump was dry.
In order to determine the PCB removal efficiency of the treatment system, and to
determine the daily expected flow rate , a pumping pattern was developed. The
initial pumping occurred during the morning of March 7, 1983 and proceeded for
approximately 1.5 hours before the sump became dry. The flow rate was less than
5 gallons per minute and the total pumpag2 wa s estimated to be 300 gallons.
Since the sand and charcoal filters had never bee n saturated with wa ter, it was
decided that the sand filter should be valved shut to let the leachate saturate
the system. After the pumping ceased, the va lv0 on the charcoal filter w::is
closed and the valve on the sand filter \.fas opened. The sand filtered leachate
was then allowed to saturate the charcoal filte r. After the charcoal filter was
saturated, the valve was opened and the treated leachate was allowed to flow
into a clay-lined holding basin.
EPA F,><m 1320·6 (Rev. 3•76)
-2-
In order to check the PCB removal efficiency of the system, an untreated grab
sample was collected from the influent to the sand filter and an effluent grab
sample was collected at a point before the water entered the holding basin.
The first set of samples were split with the North Carolina Solid and Hazardous
Waste Managemenc Branch personnel and the analytical results showed very good
agreement. The state results were 0.4 ug/1 for the influent and 0.2 ug/1 for
the effluent. The US-EPA results were 0.34 and 0.28 ug/1, respectively.
The second pumping of the system occurred during the afternoon of March 7 begin-
ning at 2:50 p.m. and continued for 32 minute s . Approximately 100 gallons were
pumped before the leachate sump became dry. Grab samples were collected from
the influent to, and from the effluent of the treatment system. Samples were
collected simultaneously for the US-EPA and a local cittiens group.
The next pumping occurred on March 8, 1983, beginning at
for 2o·~~inutes, at which time the system was pumped dry.
lons was treated. Grab samples were collected from both
of the treatment system for US-EPA analyses.
9:15 a.m. and lasted
An estimated 60 gal-
the influent and effluent
The data for all three pump tests show that the treatment system was effectively
removing the PCB's from the leachate. The highest concentration detected in the
effluent was 0.34 ug/1 which was the first leachate treated in the system, and
was not necessarily representative of the system e ffluent. It should be noted
that only Aroclor 1260 was detected during this investigation. The last two
effluent samples contained 0.043 and 0.062 ug/1 PCB'~re spectively. These con-
centrations approach~d the minimum detec tio11 limit of exi s ting analytical tech-
nology.
One trend not determined during the pumping was that of an established influ0nt
PCB concentration. The last sample collected during the final pumping test had
a concentration of 2.8 ug/1, which was over eight times higher than concentra-
tions of the first and second pumping influent concentrations (0.28 and 0.25
ug/1). This could be an anomaly, or it could be the established level of PCB
in the water flowing into the leachate sump. However, based upon the data from
the evaluation, the system appears to be working as de signed.
It was recommended by Mr. Hanke and mys e lf, tha t the system could best be oper-
ated by p~mping the sump dry and allowing approximately 1.5 hours to recover
before additional pumping is attempted. If the same basic pattern is followed
after a few days, then a two-day-per-week pumping schedule appears to be feasible.
All sampling and chain-of-custody procedures were in accordance with the
Water Surveillance Branch Standard Opera ting Procedures and Quality Assurance
Manual (Draf t, August, 1980). All labora tory analyses were in accordance with
the Laboratory Services Branch, Operations and Quality Control Manual (March,
1981).
Enclosed is a copy of the analytical data for the PCB Landfill samples.
ft~l!,/JMtA
William R. Davis
cc: Finge r/Adams/Carter/Lair
SA"IPt,!': A~D A.NlLY51S MAN•Gf:J.IP:IIIT SYSTEM !:PA•fSI) RrG IV ATfif'.IJS Gf.OPGU /10/83 PEsr1:1DES/PCB1S AND OTMEP CHLO~INATrD CO~POUNO, DATA R~PORTING SHEf.T •. ,. Te::R SAMPLE NO.I P3C154ij SA"IPLE TYPe::1 INDtN OJECT ND.I 83•107 PRJGRl~ ~LEMP:NTI fifif UPCEI N: P:~ ROADSIDE SPILL TYi WARRE~T3N STATtl NC ~TION z,o,, ,lR~t~ co LANDrILL r-1 JNfLUENT DRE? ~r r,:i, NOi MPLt COLLECTIONS START DlTE/TI~r. 03/01183 114~ "IPLE COLLr:110~, SID? DLTt/TJWE 001nu1on O LLECTED BY! P DAVIS PECEIVr.~ rRD"I R DAVIS "IPLE R[:•~1 ~ATE/Tl~~ 03/0R/83 2045 Rf.CID ~YI ~ TURNBULL ALEn1 YES t~Isr, HLR ALYlICAL ~~THJJI "\~RICI "I A'-!q "l?Lt LrG v~~Ifl~D RYt rqs •1'1.:'.~Z.RKSt•• rarl VERirJEn ~Yr J~T ························~················••*••················ •fJ0T"0T[ ••• •~•IVF~I~ VbLUr •~i-~)T l~hLYZF:D •~hi•l~TF:~f~~r"C•~ •J•fSTl~A ~1 iALUf •\•PQ~SIIMPTJVE EVl~••CF nv PRESF~::F Qf u1TE~IAL • ~ •!CT l! ~ L VI\ LI i E ! S K 'IO~•" T '1 f-i f I, f. S S T 1-i I>." V l>. Lli f. G l V V. ,. •i:-••AT';fdAL l'illS li.;iA(,Y2.E:D f(lJ: PilT "nT D~T~cn::n. THF: "1\l•l?fl'I TS T' Hf: .\ I 'I I "U"' D £ H; CT J 'l 'l l, t 'I IT• 1. WHE~ ~n ~ALUE IS ~.P~RT .. n, srE CMG~Q~-~E cn~STITUE1TS. 2 • C 0 •; s T l T u "'. ~ r S ::l r T ;:: :: -! ·~ J C II I, C •H, n R n A ,. F: • Pe:SULTS ,_A ,.,. '<A. NA NA NA N1' '-A NA NA NA NA Nl NA ,.,. SA. o.r' 0. L' Cl• ii o.2u 8:1~ ~,,u NA NA .. --.. t;A . ·1 J r I ----~ I t ~ ' •••••ANlLYT!ClL l'lt!ULTS••••• U1J1TS C J"-PDUND 5IOIU:l UG/L ALDRIN 3933 llG IL H~Pr ACHLOR 39410 UG/L HE?!ACHLDR tPOXlDg 39♦20 UG/L A~PPl.•':IHC 39)l7 UG/L P._ Tl.•BHC r pe UG/L G,~.:.A•Bl'iC (LI~DA.SE) 9 ♦ O UG/L D!!:l.TA•BHC 42!>9 llG/ l, ENODSllLH.N I (ALPHA) HHl llG/L DTELDRIN 39380 L'G/L 4 1 4 I •f)')f CP,P1•1)0T) 39joo U(i/L 4,41•DDE: CP,P1•DDE~ 39 20 IJG/1, 4,4'•DDD (P,P1•DDD l9l10 L1G/ l, EIIDRIN 9390 llG/ L E~D0suLrAN II tBEIA) 34!56 IJG/L e.lJD SULrA~ SU~fAtE 34 ~i UG/L CHLORDANE (TE H~ ~IXrURE) /l 39B UG/L P:8•1242 (lRO L· ~ 1242) 39496 UG/L P:8•1254 ~ARO~LOR ~!!4i 19!!04 IJG/1, P~8•!22! ARD LOR 1 21 i9oe ilG/L P~~•12J (~FO~LOR 1132) ~9492 llG/1, P:8•1248 ~APO LOR 1118) 39!>0i LI G / L P~~• 260 AROCLJR &O) •950 UG/L P::8•1016 (AJ.OCU1R 101 b) lH'lt UG/L TJHPHE-.e: 39400 UG/L E!\''JQJN ALDEHYDE 34,66 UG/L r:vO(DtOXllll) )4!)75 UG/L C'lLJROENE /2 77 884 l'G/L At,P~,._•CHLQRD~t.;F.: /2 llG/L GA"'"A•CHLORD_I\IE; /2 UG/L 1•1'iYD~OXVCHLDRD~"E llG/L GA~"1'•CHLORL'1d,E ~~ ps10 ,, GIL T~l-1.S•'IO'<lCHLOR 9071 UG/L A.l,PHl•C-11,QRl')A"IJ". /2 39H8 IIG /!, CI s--:rN ACHLnR /2 39068 rJr. /l, "IETi<lXY:4V)R 39480
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •F"ODT"D!E:S••• •l•lVE~A.Gf. ~A.LUE •Nl-~JT ANALYZ~n •"AI•l~TERre:P~"Cf.g •J•ESTl~ATED VALUE •li•PQ~SU~PTJVE EVIDf.NCE o, PRES~~:E OF" WAJ[Q[lL tK•iCTUAL V~LUE IS ~~OWN TQ Bf LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN ti!•"~H:F<UL liAS l..NALYZED fOll RllT NC,T DETECTED, THf, NU~Rr'.R tS THE ~INJWU~ DETtCTJnN Lt""IT ·• h~E~ ~o itLU~ IS ~,5oRTtn, Sf.E !HLOQnA~E cn~STITUE~T5, 1. CJ~STIJUt~rs or re:c~~ICAL CHL□RnANf., siw,PLE UIO Alit,!,YSIS "'lNAGE:L\Eq SYS'!E"' f.PA-,sn REG IV ATH!:N5 GEORGIA 'l◊/63 PESrI:~DES/PC~•s lND OTH~R CHLORINATED CO~POUN05 DATA Rf.PORTING SHEf.T WATER SA..,PLE N0,1 83C1549 SlWPLt TYPEt INOEr IJECT ~D,r 83•107 PRJGRA~ f.Lr~rNTt ssr IRCEI NC P:~ RDADSID~ SPJLL ·rr •A~R[N!)N STATEt NC ,TION IlD,t ~lR~tN co, L1'.NDfILL E•1 rrrLUt~T IRtT S! T10N NOi IPLt COLLt:fID~I S?lqT D~It/T!U.E OJ/07/83 1220 l~~t c,LLE:TIJNI STOP DlT~/TI~~ 00/00/00 0 ,LE:T£D P,Yt R DlV!S P~CtIVtD rPo~, R DlVIS !P~E PEC1Dt OlTE/TJ~g 03/06/83 2045 RE:1D ~YI W TURNRULL ,L~DI YES ;~lSTI HLR ,L?IIClL ~e:.THDDi {IRl't \ l RI( I IPLf. LDG VE~lr!EO 0y1 T~B •~f."'lRKS••• n,r,-VEAirIEn PYt J~T ►••··························••t••·················-·········· •""0"1JPl0TES••• ·~•AVEAi~f. VALUE .~~-~nT -~lLYZf.D •NAI•T~Tr::Rrr.RrNCE• •~t-E.STl"~T~.il VALUE •rl•PIIFS!IJ,PTtVf f.VIOr::r.~i:; Of PRf.S••J::E 81" '1~T£11IAL ►k•ACTUAL V6LU~ IS KNJ~~ TJ ~~ L~SS TH~~ VALUP GlV~N >t 1 •"'·A T f R 1 A L "A S A •di!, Y 7.. C::: I') F' 11, Rn T "JOT n ~ n: C: P,'. f:I , TH F'. "U" =l F. R 1 <; T4~ ~,~1~u~ c.r.:r,~~ Lt"'TT, ·•,:HF,•~"'" Vr..f,llE. TS ,S,;P')'<H'f', si::.~ cµt.ORO~.•-F. cn.-,~rrrri,:,:rs, ! • C (l ,; ST IT cl£~ TS Cl• Tr:; C '"'I:: AL ;: ,n ri? r, A:-; E, lstSULTS •ll Nll "Ill Nll i; A .. ,. ,u 1/l Nl Ill Ill ,o, .. ,. lil IIA 111'. O,05U C, 2 ll 0, c,5 U O,O!Hi Cl, OSU 0,2~l 2!05U q, ~A "'" •••••lllALYTJ:AL RESULTS••••• UNITS UG/1, UG/1, IIG/L llG/L UG/L UG/L ITG I l, lTG/L lTG/L UG/L IJG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L llG/L UG/L tr GIL 11G/L IJG/L LIG/L l1G/L 11~/L U..,/L UG/L UG/L IIG/L LlG 11, 'JG/ L Uc:IL llG/l: llG/L UGI!, LIG/L llG/L l'G /1, CJ"PDU"ID l LDRI N H e;P UC Ht.OP H~?TACHL~R tPOXIOE ALPHl•!Hh. E\tH•BHC GA~~~•BHC (L!"IDlNt) DtLTA•E\HC f~DDSULrAN I (lt,Pijl) DHLDQ.!N 4,41•DOT CP,P'•ODT) 4,4••~ni:; (P,P'•ODt) 4,41•00D (P,P1•0D0} i:; ND~l N EWDOSULrAN II (SrTA) E~DOSUt,rl~ 8ULfATE CKL)RDA~E CT~CH1 ~IXTURE) P:e-1i•2 (ARO~LoR 1242) P:8•!2~4 (ARO~LOR :254) P~~•1221 (ARO;L3R 1221) PCB•1232 (~Ru~LOR 12j2) P:f•124~ (~~OCL0R 12~~) P:e~1,60 (kROCLDR 1760) PC~•1016 (~ROCLJR 1016) T:).OPHE!I:!: f:t;DPit; ll.,DfHYDI!: r:o~ ( DIOXH i :'%:JROEN@: /2 l~PH~•C~LORO£Nr. /2 r,~J.~t•C~LOP.Dr::NE /2 l•~YO~OXYCHLORDE~E Gl~~t•CHLORO,NE /2 r~•~s-~o~ACHLO~ /2 ALPH,■~HLO?DANE /2 :rs-~o~t:HLOR /2 s1~THJXY:'"L('IR. /1 &J~~~6 39410 394~0 l933'7 39338 13:1):i 4 61 9 80 39 00 nPg Hiio 34356 HH1 39BO 39496 3 9!! 04 19488 94.92 950~ 395 08 34671 39400 34 366 3467!5 71884 39810 39071 393<8 )9068 3900 "i r
••..............••.....•.•......... , ...............•........... ••rOuTllOTES••· ·~•lVERlGf VALLI~ •NA■~nT ANALYZED •~AI•INTtRrERf.NCis •J•ESTlMhTED VALUE •N■PRESll~~TIVE ~v10r.~cE or r;,s~NCE or ~~?~RIAL ·~-~:ru~L V4Lug Is KNO~N I~ ~E L~SS THlN VALUf GIVEN 1,r .... .r.TE:Rl-'L •AS AIHLYU:D r1R R!JT •)QT f)~TF:CIFD, THf: OJU"Bt'.:R I~ TH~ ~tNIMU~ DrT~CTJQN Ll"'IT 1. 1,/f-'f.N 'IQ v,1,oe: IS ~E:PO~TF:f'l, 1'F.:E t1H.ORD1>.NE: CONSTJTl_lr,►JTS. 2a CDNSIJTU~NTS Dr TE:~Nl:IL C~LORDANE1 SA~PLE AND ANlLiSIS ~A'IAG~~ENT S!STE~ ,:c,i •ESr> t RF;(; l V ATHENg c,P:l')RGI&. 3/10/83 PESTI:aoES/PCB1S •~o OTHER CHL~R!NA!ED CO~PCUNDS D~TA RrPORJING SKEET i.ATER s•~PLr. NO.a R3C1550 Sl~PLt !YPEI INDIN RnJt~T ~J,1 83•107 PRJG~l~ ~LE~tNTI SSf 00~c~, ~= P:e ~OlDSID£ SPILL lTYI ~lRRENTOH !TlT~I NC TAT!Qij IlDal 'ARREN CO, LlND,ILt I•2 JNrLUENT TORET ST TiON NOi l~PL~ CDLLE:1I0St sr~•T l"'PLE COLL£:!IO~I STOP OLLECT~D &YI R DAVIS ~~?LE Rf:1DI OlTE/TIMt El.LED! YE! Kt11ar1 "!LR N~LiTiCAL ~ETHJJI !:W.l. 1111: I E1o1Zd,I(& ~~Tr/TI~E 03/07/83 1510 ~lTt/TI~E 00/00/00 0 F~:EIVtD FR0111 R DAVIS 03/06/83 2045 RtC1D ~YI W TURNBULL l~fLF, LnG VERirIED RYI TBB ••PE"'.ld<KS••• DATA VfRl'!ED ~YI J~T ······································~························ ••fOOTNOT;.:S••• •A•AVfRA~~ VALllE ·"'~•~OT ANALYZEn •~AJ•INTERrER~NCES •J-~STI~~Tl!:D VlLU~ •N•PRfSU~PTTVf ~VIDENCE nr PRFSE~CE nr UAT!RilL •I(•.\ C 'Jl.11' L VAL U !.: IS K IJ Q,; N T ') B II: LES 5 TH l "l ITAL !IF: GI V Pl Hl•MiH:RJAL 114S lNld,YZE::'l f/"\R l•t!T ,-;QT ne:n:cn:n, nu: "llJU,p.~R IS THE UlM!~U~ DETECTION LIMIT 1. W~EN NO VALUE ts RfP~RT~D, ~E~ tHLORnA~E CQNSTtTUE~T5, 2. CD~5tITUE~TS or TE:~vI:At r~LO~nANE, HSULTS NI>. NA .. " "'" a; A liA NA Ill IJl .. ,. NI>. NA NA Nl 0 1oA 0 1 1 tJ 0 1 2 II O,tU o,1u 0,1U 0,2s 0 j 1 LI ... .. ,. WI,. -· .. .. -· .. --... Nl ,i . ~ -•••••ANALYTICAL R~SULTS••••• ~ UNITS COW:POUr,JD STORti UG/L ALDilIN 3933 llG/L ..(!;PTV"HLOR 39U0 r LlG/1, H!:PTl:HLOR EPOXIDr. 39420 LlG/L UP!U.•RHC 39)}'7 UG/L Fl!:H•BHC J9338 IIG/L GA1111l•E\i.;C (LINDAN!:) 9340 r-~' l!G/1, ntlH•HHC J4P9 UG/L EIIDOSULf'AN I CUPKA) 4 61 IJG / L DIErORIN 39380 llG/L 4,4t•DDT ~P,P1•DDT~ rioo ,. UG/L 4,41•DDt P,P'•DD~ 9 20 UG/L 4,41•DDD (P,P1•DDO} 9310 IIG/L EilvRI N 9390 UGI[, l!:NDOSULP"AN II (HU) H356 ,· LlG/t, E~DDSLlLrAN SULrlT[ HBA UG/L ~KLDR~lt,/£ (T~CH~ ~ixrU~E) /1 HU6 UG/L .•. , ,, !''IL' ,.,, UG/L P~8•1254 ARD LOR 1~54! p~o, UG/L Pif•l221 iRD LOR 1 21 .9481! U8/L &·c•12l ~lRD tOR 1;lj ~949~ lJ /[, ~8•~ 4 ARO DR 4 .:950 UG/L P~e-1i60 ArDCLDR 1 bO} 39508 UG/L P:8•1016 (AROCLDR 1016) 34671 llG/L TOXl.PHEt;[ J9400 UG/L [I/CRIN ALO!:HYO!: 4356 UG/L T:uD(OlOXIN) 3015 UGI~ Ci,;1,:)KDEN~ /2 7iH4 UGI lt,PHl•CKl,DRD!sN[ /2 UG/L Gl~ioil•CHLORDl!:NE /2 UG/L 1•HYDRDXYCHLORDtNE Ur.It, Gl"'-"k•CHLDRDlNE 12 ps10 UG/L T~Al<5•NO'iACHLC~ /2 901! IJG/L HPH A•C H LORD-',· g /2 3934 llG/L CIS•t;QNACHLOR /2 H()l8 IJG/L "-E!HOXYCHLOR uo
Sl~PLt AND ANALYS15 MANJGEME~T SYSTE~ tPl•E~DtAFG IV ATHENS ur.ORf.IA 3/10/~3 P[STI:1JES/PCB1S AND OTHER CHLnRINlTED cn~PDU~DS DlTl AFPOATING ~HEfT ~hTER SA"IPLt N0,1 83C!551 SA~PLt TYPEI lNDtr ROJ£CT N0,1 83•107 PRJGRA~ tLEMENTI ssr OURCt1 NC P;~ ROADSIDt !PILL ITYI ~ARRENIJN STAT~I NC ?ATIO~ 1,0,1 WARRtN co. LANOrILL t•2 trrLur~, TORET ST T,ON ~01 ~~~Lt COLLE:1IOHI STlRT O~Tt/l!~t D)/07/83 1,20 kMFLE COLLt:TIJNI 5!0P DlTE/TI~E 00/0C/OD 0 OLL£CTtD ~YI R DAVIS PEC{IVtO fRO~J R DAVIS •AM?LE R£C1DI OATt/Tl~t 03/08/!3 ~o,s RECD BYI W TURNBULL tALEDI Yt5 Ht~!STI HLR ~lLYTICAL ~tTHDDI .[!".ARK I .E:"1 lllK I A"IPLt LOG VtR1r1£D SYI rqs ·••Rt"'L.RKS••• ni.TA Vt~1r1ED BYI J•T ·••············································~················ •••l'OC'INO!E5••• •A•lVrRAGE VALUt •'<A•NOT l~ALYZEO •NAI•INTERFtREIICES tJ•ESTI~ATrD VALUE •ll•PRF.SU~PTJV~ EVIDENCE o, PR~SE'<CE Of ,.AT~~tAL •K•AC'tllAl, V~LUE 1S Ko;J,;11 TO Rf: LESS THAN VALllP: GIVE\! •ll•"'~T►'RllL •AS ANALYZED ,')R E\UT 'IDT DE:l'f,CTF:01 '!'HF. lllJ'l~ER JS lHF. VJ .. lMU~ DEr-,:rJ1N LJ'IIT 1, ~~EN ND VALUE IS ~rpo~rro, 5EE tHLnRo~~r. CONSTITUENTS, 2. CO~STTTU~~rs ~~ r .. c~~ICl~ CHLOROAIIE. ,J •••••AN~LYTICAL p~gULTS••••• RESULTS U~lT! co~POUND STORtT NA UG/L ALDRIN 39330 NA UC.: It, 1-H: P Tl C 1-i L ~ t; 3 9(, l O 1·• NA Ur.IL HEP!lCHLOR EPDXI~t )94,O ti 'IA IJG/l, Al,FHl.•RHC 3933'1 NA llG/L HI J.•1'-1-lC 39338 'IA llG/L Gl~!'IJ.•l:HiC CLIND~'-1!:) 19340 ) NA UG/L DU.H•RHC 425l NA UG/L ENDO!ULrAN I (ALPHl) 436 NA UG/L, DIELDRIN 1911 Nl UG/L 4,41•DDT P,P1•DDT) 9 00 !JA (IG/L 4,41•DDt ~Pd"•ODt) 9 20 '1~ llG/l, 4,_t1•0DD ~P,P1•DDD) 9 10 !JA UG/L t'1DRIN 9 90 NA UG/1., t~DOSULrlN II (![Tl) 343!6 NA UG/l, t'iDO!ULF'AN !ULrart 343!1 NA UG/L CKLORDANE (T£CH1 ~IX!URE) /1 393!0 0,02U UG/L P~€•1242 ARO!LvR 1242) 39496 O,C-4U UG/L P~8~1,~4 ARO LOR 1,54) 9504 o.02u UG/1., P 8•12 lRO LOR 122 ~01 o,02u UGIL PiS•DH ARO LOR 121¼~ li;o2 0,02U UG/L P.,13•1{'8 OD LOR 1248~ 9500 0,043 UG/L F~~-1~60 ARD~tDR 12b0) 9508 o,02u UG/L P~e-1016 AROtLOR 1016) 34671 N UG/t, '!'..1:0PH!:NE 39400 NA UGIL EliDRIN ALDCHYD! ,4 366 NJ. UG/L TCOD(DIOXIN) HU •• UG/L CHLORDtNt /2 HU •• UG/L ~LrHA•CHLOR~[ijt /2 ... UGiL Gl."'IO•CHLOF<'DEN!: /2 •• UG/L 1•HYDROXYCHLO~O£Nt •• UG/L Gl.,.",J.•CHLORDAH; /2 J9i10 UG/t, 'IRJ.ll'S•NONAC:HL:)R /2 390?1 •• Uc;/t, llJl'HA•CliLOROANt: '" 1uu •• llG/L C!S•NOllll~HLOR. /2 9061 NA. UGIL ~trHOXYCttLOR 900
, ...... , ..................................................... . J"0'.:'PiOTE5••• .,.,wf?AGE VALUE tNl•IIOT A~&LYZfD 1NII•I~TERrtR~NCES 1J•E5J]wlTEJ VILUE •N•P~[SU~PTIVE EVlD[NCg OF PR~SEN:E Of ~lT[RTlL 1 K • t. C T : I A L H L U E I S K '< J ,. 11 T O R. I' I, f. 5 S Tfi I N V AL ll F; G I n: N • \l •" l H; R !l L • A S A "1 l LY Z I:: D r '1 R P-lJ T tv OT DE: T >.: r f D, TH f. 11 U" 8 ER I S !ME ~INIMU~ Dtr .. :r1~11 LI~IT • ~HEN ~o VALUE IS ~[PO~Tl'D, ~~f ~HLnROIUE CONSTITUtNTS, t. CD~STlTUE~rs or Tf.:~NI:At CHLORnl~E. Sl~PLE AN~ lNltYSIS µlNlG~~ENT SYsrg~ EP~•ESD1REG IV lTHE~S GEORGIA 10/83 PtSTI:1DESIPCB1S 1110 OTHER CHLORINATED CO~PJUND5 DITA RrPO~TING S~E:fT ~lTE? S~~PLt NO,t S3C1552 Sl~PLE TYPEt INDTN IJECT N'.), I B3•107 IR:Ea ~c P:9 P~ADSIDt ·y I ,O.RP(.11!)~ TIO~ I1D11 iOPP:N CD, IR[T STAT!)~ t-:'.'.ll PPJr.Rl~ F.L~"£NT1 ssr SPILL SHH:1 NC LA"iirTLL I•l INrLU~NT PL,E cotu:TIJNI STl<RT DlH/T!t~e: 0)/0B/~3 1040 ~LE CJLLE:TIJ'll STOP DlTf/Tl"~ 00/00/00 0 ,LE:TED BYI R DI.VIS RECEIVED rFlO"l R DAVIS IPLl REC'D! DATE/Tl~~ 03/C8/83 2045 RECD B'tl w TJRNBULL L[DI YF;S ,"'1STI HLR. l,)'!IC.t.L "'[!rlJDI t. RI< I A~KI PLf. lDG V[QiritD P-YI T~~ Rt::u;.Rt-:S••• n•T• VE~IrIEO PYt JWT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• r:)OTNCTES••• A•AVERA~f v,LU[ •NA-~DT ANALYZED •NAI•lNTERr[REIICES J•ESTI~AT~') OLUF: •r.•PRES!J"PTIVE F:VIDl':NCr;: or PRESE"1Ct OP' "IATERIIIL ·K•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOwN ro BF. LESS THAN VALUE GIVEII · l1 • ~, t.. T F: R ! AL ii, S A !w ALY Z e; 0 V' n 11 Fl 1J T NOT DETECT E O , TH I". NU I.AB F: R IS THF. ~J"'I~U~ DETECTJry-. Ll"IIT , W~F'.~ NO VALUE IS R~PDRT!D, SE£ ~HLORDAN~ CONRTITUE~TS, ! , C CJ"' ST II U;:"' T S OF' TE C ~ N T :: A I, C' 4 !, 0 P !) A NE • 1<!:SULTS NII. "1A NA NA NA NA NI NA ",. NA NI NA ,a PO ... ,a g~6U 0,6U 0,6U 0,6U 2,8 ~l~u "ii. NI. ... ... 'll ( ' •••••ANALYTICAL Pt.SULTS••••• UNITS UG/L UG/L U(;/L UG/L llG / L UG/L UG/L llG/L UG/l, UG/L UG/L UG/L llG / L UG/L llG/1, !JG/L llG/1, UG/L llG/L UG/L UG/L LIG/L UG/t, llG/L UG/L PG/L UG/L !IG/l, PG/L liG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L l'G/L COIIIPJUNO lLDRlN HEP P:HLDR Ht.PT~:rlLJR EPvX1og lLPHA•tlHC BEH•BHC GAW~A•BHC (LlNOlNt) DtLIA•P.i-lC tNOQSULrAN I c•LPHA) DI!LORIN 4141•00T (P,P'•DDT~ 4141•0D€ (P,P1•DO~ 4,41•0D0 CP,P1•DDD ENDIUN tNDJSULrAN II (Bt!I.) [NDJSULrAN su~rArt CHLDROA~E Cit H1 ~IXIUR[) ~~~•1242 (ARO LuR 1242) P~~•l2~4 ~ARDCLDR 12~4 P~!•t221 lROCt,OR 221 Pi~•!i32 ARDCLDR 1232 P.5•1248 [JRDCLDR 1248 riA•1260 (~ROCLOR 12b0 P~S•1016 (I.RDCLDR 1016 TDUP!-itli[ !:IIDR!N UDEHYD!: T:ODCDI'JXll'i) CHLDPOENE /2 ALPHA•CHLORQiNt /2 Gl~Wl•CHLDRD[~E /2 1•~~DRDXYCHLORD[N[ GA~~A•t~LDRDlNt /2 TRA~S•~QNACHLOR 1i lLPHt.•CHLORDlNE /2 C!S•NJNlCHLOR /2 "l[!"sOX Y:HLl'\R /1 !JiRU 19H8 9420 9337 393311 39340 34259 34361 39380 19)00 9320 ing 4 51 14156 9 50 9 96 39504 39488 39492 39500 39501 34671 39400 343H lHH 778ii4 n~~o ni:i 39480 j ,t f. rl 11 I
··••t••························································ ••rOOiNOTES••• •l•IVE~~Gf. VlLUE •Nl•NOT lNlLYZ>.D •~AI•!NTERrtF>.NCtg •J•ESTl~lTEJ VlLUE -~-P~~su~PTJVE EVIDfNCE or PR[SEMCf or •K•ICT~lL v,LUE Ig KNQ~N IO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN ·~•V•TERilL ~•s lNlLYZED FOR RIIT NOT DETECTED, TH[ NU~RrR 15 THE ~INI~U~ DETECTJO~ LIMIT "'l.'TE~taL 1, WHEN NO V&LUE IS R~OORT~n, ~EE !HLORDAVE CONSTITUENTS, 1, CONSTITUE~rs or TEC~NlCAL CHLORDANE, Sl~PLE &ND ,NlLYSIS ~lNAGEMENT SYSTE~ fP1•f.Sr REG IV arHtNB btoRGI• 3/10/83 PESII:1DES/PC91S lND OTH~R CHLDRI~ITFD CO~POUNns o,r. REPnRTIWG S~EfT ~ATER Sl~PLE ~J,I R3C1553 Sl>.I.IPLE TYPF I I ~nEF" ROJECT ND,1 ij)■107 DURC£1 ~C P:~ RDIDSID£ ITYI ~ARRENfJ~ TATION I,Dll ~ARREN co, TORET ST~T J~ NOi PRJGRAI.I ~LE~~NT1 ssr SPILL SHTEI NC L•~orILL E•~ r.rrLUE~T ll.lPLE CJLLE:!lJN1 START DAT~/ll~E 03/08/R) 1105 AMPLE COLL~:IIJNI STOP DATE/TlME 00/10/00 n DLltCTED R!I R DAVIS R~CEIVEO rR□"'I R DlV!S l,-;PLE REC1DI oaTE/TIME 03/08/R) 2045 Rf.C1D RYI W TURN~ULL EALEDt YES ~E~ISTI ~LP. ~ALYTICAL ~E!HJ~I ~MIRKI ~~ARKI l~PLt LOG VERiritD BYI TB9 ••PEua;KS••• DATA VERirIED RYI J~T '···································••*••······················ ••P'ODTNOTF:S••• •A•AVERAGE VALUE •"1A•"10T ANALYZ~D • AI•lNTERrrRt"1CE~ •J•ESTl"'LTEO VALll~ •~•0RfSU~PTIVE EVIOE,; E OF PRESE.,CE OF ~~ftRIAL •K•1cru,L VtLUE IS K"1Q~N TO ~f LESS THA"1 ALUf G1VE"1 •U•W&JEijl~L ~AS AN~LY~ED roR RUT NOT DETE IFD, THE ~u~~~R IS THF' lo\JNI'-1,1" !')ETE:::TJOII 1-l"llT 10 ~Hf~ NO V~LUE TS ~VPO~TfQ, ~~E tHL□RnA~E CONSTITUE~TS, 2, c::i1,STJTll£'HS Of T~CHNlCAL CHLORnAliE, PU.ULTS N1< Nl ... •H. NA Ii,., N r, Ill). NA Nl !JA r-il Ii A NA !JA NA 0,02U n.o&u o,oiu 0,•12U 0,02U n,0~2 2l02U '16. '<l -· .. -· .. .. ,;• . " ' \ •••••lNALY!lCl>.L RESULTS••••• llill!TS C'.:l~PnllND UG/l, AkDRIN UG/L Ht.i'HCliLOR llG/L HEPJA:HLDR EPOXIDE llG/L IJG/L l~P,U•RHC e H•BKC UG/L Gt."Mt..•F'.HC CLINMNE) LIG/t, DUTA•l3HC IJG/L ENODSl!LfAN I (1.LP>ll) llG/1, OIELDQIN l!G/L 4,41•DDT ~P,P1•DDT~ l!G/L 4,4••~Dr. P,P'•DD£ UG/L 4,41•0D0 CP,P'•DDD llG/1, F:11 OR IN UG/L EijDQSULrAN II istTl) UG/l, E~DOSULP'lN SUL lTt IJGIL CHLORDANE (TE~H~ ~IXTURE) UG/L P~~-1~41 ~~RO LR 1242~ lJG/1, P~8•1 5 AROCLOR 12~4 llG/L .,~e-122; ~ H<Oi LOR l2 2 1) UG/L P:~•l23 ARD-.LO•, 232) ti GIL P:J:\•1248 (AROCL'.)R 1248) UGIL P:-B•12b0 (ARDCLDR 1260~ 11G/L P=S•1016 (lRDCLDR 1016 iJG/L TOXAPKE'-11: UG/L Eo;DRI '-' A.LtlEH!D!: u::;/L r:DD(DIOXIN) UGIL :HLClRDtNr. 12 l'G/l, lt,PiihCHLDRDEllt /2 UG II, Gt II"'.~ •CH[,ORDENE /2 IJG/L 1•KYDROXYCHLORDtNE u:;11, Gl"(1J.t.•CHLORDlo;t 12 UG/L TRA."1S•'-'0" A~KLO• 12 U G It, UPHA•CHLCi DIii-': /2 UG/l, CI S•"J~ lCl-!l,OR /2 I_IG/T, ~f,!HOXY:'iL□ R /1 j ...... (j i --' .. '·~ ~ ~ , ·""·· •J ST~Rl;T I po 9 10 39420 39H7 39338 pHo 4259 Hlbl 39380 39300 J9fl0 9 10 39390 HPb i· 51 9350 l9'96 .9504 pos 949~ 3950 39508 H~71 HHO 34366 ~H75 78H4 ~91110 _9071 !9348 3,068 HOO { ;I ht ;J :-J