Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCD980602163_19821210_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_EPA Region IV Response to 16 Oct 1982 letter re PCB Landfill-OCR,ftO S7-4,-->"" ~,S' ~ ft ~ ~ ~Ttt w UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY \ ~ <",i, ,, ,.◄l Pf!01tC, RE G ION I V DEC 1 o 1982 REF: 4RC Mr. James M. Johnson Chairperson 34!5 COURTLAND STREET ATLANTA. GEORGIA 3036!5 Residents Engaged in Action for a Cooperative Hollister Littleton Road, Box 45-C Littleton: North Carolina 27850 Dear Mr. Johnson: This letter responds to your letter of October 16, 1982, to Ms. Anne Gorsuch, Administrator of the u. s. Environmental Protection Agency, in which you voiced concern about the Warren County, North Carolina, PCB landfill. I appreciate your concern and would like to address your comments. In June 1978 liquid materials containing PCBs were discharged onto roadsides of the military reservation at Fort Bragg, in Cumberland County, near Fayettevil le, North Carolina. Shortly thereafter, complaints were received from various areas of eastern and Piedmont North Carolina of like occurrences. From Warren, Johnston and Harnett counties in the east and from Lee, Chatham and Person counties in the Piedmont area, reports came into Raleigh of roadside areas saturated with an oily substance later identified as containing PCBs. In all, fifty one separate sites in fourteen counties were sprayed with the contaminant. A thorough investigation by State and Federal officials determined that the substance was used oil removed from transformers at Ward Transformer Company in Raleigh and disposed of by a private contractor. Federal indictments arising out of the incidents resulted in guilty pleas or verdicts of guilty against all of those allegedly involved. As soon as the substance was identified as PCB, studies and tests were begun to determine the safest, most feasible, and economical way of dealing with the 210 miles of contaminated roadside. Knowledgeable experts in the field were either brought in or contacted in an effort to determine whether it would be best to treat the soil in place or remove it for burial or incineration. It was subsequently determined that alternatives to a landfill would not be effective or feasible. The tc:.sk thus began of selecting a suitable landfill site. The State of North Carolina began the site screening process with some ninety potential sites. The State eliminated the great - 2 - majority of these sites from consideration on the first screening because they failed to meet the requirements for a PCB landfill. As a result of further screening, the State narrowed the original list to only a few possible sites that were suitable (i.e., had adequate soils for liner construction and were large enough to accommodate the landfill and surrounding buffer zone). After the State of North Carolina sele~ted the Warren County, North Carolina, site, the State prepared an application for the site and submitted it to EPA, Regi0n IV, in December 1978. The application was subsequently apwroved after extensive review in accordance with existing regulations promulgated by EPA under the authority of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). A Federal district court upheld EPA's approval in Twitt , et al., v. State of North Carolina, et al., 527 F.Supp. 77 (E.D. N.C. Warren oun y v. tate of North Carolina, et al., 528 F.Supp. 276 (E.D. N.C. 1981). In August 1982, the same court reaffirmed its decision in a separate suit brought by the Warren County Chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The Warren County landfill was designed for one time use only to contain the PCB contaminated soil from the contaminated North Carolina roadsides. The landfill as designed and constructed is safe and environmentally sound and presents no threat to the local ecology or water supply. The landfill was constructed with major emphasis on the protection of surface water and groundwater from potential contamination from the material buried at the site. The design incorporates an artificial liner and five foot compacted clay liner below the landfill to prevent hydraulic connection with groundwater and an artificial liner and two foot compacted clay liner on top of the landfill to prevent infiltration of rain and surface water. There are also leachate collection systems installed above and below the bottom liners to remove any leachate. This system will be monitored monthly. In addition, there are groundwater monitoring wells installed around the site which will be sampled on a monthly basis during operation or for a period of one year, whichever is shorter, and semi-annually after closure. Surface streams located downgrade from the site will be monitored monthly during operation of the site and semi-annually during the post-closure period. The disposal site design, therefore, provides for stringent environmental isolation of the PCB contaminated soil. - 3 - I trust this information is useful to you. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. n~~~ nal Ad~-=or cc: North Carolina Department of Human Resources North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety