Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCD980602163_19811022_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_PCB Background - Roadside spills resident-OCR, .. ecr 2 2 1sst_ \ PCB Background 4!o<> J e.; ~-~ ,· : _,., A.e. J ,' J. r ~ ~- 1. On the question of the allegations by Dr. Armstrong that the Jordan's suffered froITT one stillbirth and gave birth to another child who was grossly malformed and subsequently died because of PCB? --We have checked this physician's fears against the most complete and accurate scientific information available in the world and we have been told by Dr. Renate Kimbrough, the leading national expert on PCBs and thei·r health effects that the types of birth defects that have been seen when individuals (both human and animal) have been exposed to PCBs in massive amounts over long periods of times, as well as in lesser amounts are--the infants are born of smaller birth weight than normal and they sometimes have darker skin pigmentatio~ than normal. The only other documented case of birth defects associated with PCB 1 s is in an early set of experiments with rats. In these cases there was some evidence of neurological impairment. Dr. Kimbrough says that PCB has never been shown to cause the types of birth defects seen in the Jordan baby and that the tests have been extensive enough that some previous cases would have been seen. Dr. Kimbrough does not feel that the Jordan baby problems were associated with PCB. The jordan child had cleft 1 ip, cleft palate, congenital heart malformations, congenital intestinal malformations but normal chromosomes. This would indicate some type of toxic involvement but such defects have been seen in the case of taking too much aspirin, diet soft drinks, smoking, drinking too much coffee and other types of normal every day exposures. 2 2. On the question of health monitoring. The state1 s position has been that the best people to monitor the health of an individual patient is the individual 1 s own doctor. It is he who best knows what health effects are unusual for him. All doctors in the state in practice two years ago were sent descriptions of the symptoms of PCB exposure and laboratories to which they could mail blood samples for tests if they felt the~ to be needed. They were also asked to contact their local health department and the Division of Health Services should they suspect involvement. Over the past two years fewer than a half dozen cases have been reported by physicians and all have been checked out. Mrs. Jordan herself contacted the Division of Health Services and state follow-ups were made. There has been no indication of any PCB related illness in North Carolina. Dr. Armstrong is a young doctor and the state was only informed of her concerns in the Greensboro Sunday article. She has been contacted daily by health officials in an attempt to follow up on her concerns. 3. On the question of general monitoring. --The state conducted continuous surveillance for several months following the PCB incident on wells, animals, vegetation. Those tests showed no change over those months. Now monitoring is done when requested. There is sti 11 no change. Of the over 80 wells that have been monitored for PCB only one well has ever ; shown any change in the PCB level. This was the well referred to in the Greensboro Daily News article. It showed a level of .25 parts per bi 11 ion. This is one-fourth the amount needed before any action is recommended by the Center for Disease Control. This well was contaminated when a garden hose broke and washed contaminated soil into the well. With that exception, all indications are that the PCB has stayed exactly where it was placed, that it has not migrated and that it is causing no health problems. OCT 2 2 1980 Despite the article in the News and Observer, essentially the deinstitutionalization record of North Carolina is one of the best in the country. We have not had situations here in which mental patients have been released from hospitals with no place to go and no treatment at all. The effort here, is so successful, in fact, that we now have placed into many good community programs all but the chronically mentally i 11. The community programs are now full and are becoming overburdened and I feel that new community programs need to be put into place to assure consistent, supportive treatment of the chronically mentally ill when they. return to their hometowns. am now examining proposals to provide funds to do just this. I would also like to point out that the chronically mentally ill are dangerous to anyone but themselves through self-neglect and this behavior ca n be controlled with appropriate treatment. But there is another issue that must be addressed soon which involves another group of patients--those who are violent and aggressive and are committed to institutions under the present involuntary commitment law. The current law bends over backwards to protect individual liberties of patients and in so doing does not adequately address the need of the public to feel secure from dangerously assaultive people, nor the need of the patient for protection against his or her own violent acts. I think we need to reexamine that law and make provisions so that the violent and aggressive individual can receive needed treatment in appropriate and restrictive environments. This would protect the safety of both the patient and the public.