Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCD991278953_20070222_National Starch & Chemical Corp._FRBCERCLA RA_OU-2 Trench Area Reforestation Program 2006 Status Report-OCRI I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I ~ ARCADIS BBL Infrastructure, environment, facilities Mr. Jon K. Bornholm United States Environmental Protection Agency -Region 4 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303-3104 Subject: OU2 Trench Area Reforestation Program 2006 Status Report National Starch & Chemical Company Salisbury, North Carolina Dear Mr. Bornholm: On behalf of National Starch & Chemical Company (NSCC), Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. (now known as ARCADIS U.S., Inc. [ARCADIS BBL]) has prepared this letter to present monitoring results for the 2006 OU2 Trench Area Reforestation Program for the Cedar Springs Road Plant Site (Site) in Salisbury, North Carolina (Figure 1 ). The objectives of the reforestation project include 1) create a self-sustaining vegetative canopy cover to decrease infiltration of surface water to groundwater; 2) promote species diversity of tree and shrub stratum typical of surrounding areas; and 3) provide additional function of wildlife habitat. During the initial reforestation activities conducted in 2005, approximately 1,800 bare root saplings were planted in a 10-foot by 10-foot grid pattern. Trees planted included approximately 1,000 scarlet oaks (Quercus coccinea), 400 to 500 loblolly pines (Pinus taeda), and 300 black locusts (Robinia pseudoacacia). Figure 1 presents a landscape plan for the initial planting event. Adaptive management is used to direct the OU2 Trench Area Reforestation Program towards achieving the aforementioned objectives through monitoring events to evaluate project status relative to project objectives, implementation of maintenance activities, and adjusting management strategies based on monitoring event results. Maintenance activities for the OU2 Trench Area Reforestation Program are currently focused on the reduction of invasive species occurrence and increasing growth and survival rate of planted trees. Imagine the result ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 2033 North Main Street Suite 340 Walnut Creek California 94596 Tel925.274.1100 Fax 925.274.1103 www.arcadis-us.com ARCADIS BBL February 22, 2007 Contact: Jessica Seebald Phone: 925.29.7812 Email: jessica.seebald@ arcadis-us.com Our ref: B0060011 #5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ARCADIS BBL This letter discusses data collection methods, presents monitoring event results, and provides recommendations for future adaptive management activities for the OU2 Trench Area Reforestation Program. On May 16, 2006 and November 16, 2006, ARCADIS BBL conducted quantitative sampling of planted trees and qualitative evaluation of reforestation area conditions. Field personnel applied deer repellent to planted deciduous trees and spot-sprayed herbicide to target invasive species on May 16, 2006 and July 11, 2006. Field personnel pruned saplings, as needed, during the May, July, and November events to promote vertical growth. Methods ARCADIS BBL implemented methods described below during monitoring events in 2006 to collect data regarding planted tree growth in OU2 and general conditions of the reforestation area. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected to evaluate the condition of planted trees. Qualitative data was collected to evaluate overall reforestation area condition. Sample Design The project area was divided into six management zones of approximately similar area. The corners of each management zone were uniquely designated as "A", "B", "C", or "D". Figure 2 presents management zone orientation and identification. Data regarding height, condition, and intensity of deer browsing for approximately one- third of planted trees were collected from a random sample population in each management zone. Data were collected from a randomly selected starting point in the management zone and proceeded with every third tree. The staring point was randomly selected by noting the second hand position when sampling began and following the procedure listed in Table 1. Table 1: Sample Population Selection Conditions Parameter Position of Second Hand Management Zone Starting Corner A 1 -15 B 16 -30 C 31 -45 D 46 -0 0087118i0,<b: Mr. Jon K. Bornholm February 22, 2007 Page: 2/8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ARCADIS BBL Parameter Position of Second Hand Starting Direction from Starting Corner Left 1 -30 Right 31 - 0 Starting Tree in First Row 1st tree 0-20 2'd tree 21 -40 3'd tree 41 - 0 Data Collection Procedures Data collection for planted trees included the following. • • • Height Tree height was measured to the nearest inch, from the ground surface to the highest live portion of the plant. Dead plants were not measured. Condition A qualitative evaluation of plant health was recorded. Plant condition was categorized as dead, poor, fair, good, or excellent. Table 2 provides a qualitative description for each category used to evaluate tree condition. Deer Browsing Intensity of deer browsing was evaluated and categorized as none, mild, moderate, or heavy. Table 3 provides a qualitative description for each category used to evaluate browsing intensity. Table 2: Plant Condition Categories Score Description of Score Excellent No evidence of stress; minor pest or pathogen damage may be present Good Some evidence of stress; pest or pathogen damage present Fair Moderate level of stress; high levels of pest or pathogen damage Poor High level of stress; high levels of pest or pathogen damage Dead No evidence of live growth on plant or plant uprooted 008711810d:x: Mr. Jon K. Bornholm February 22, 2007 Page: 3/8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ARCADIS BBL Table 3: Deer Browsing Intensity Categories Score Description of Score None No evidence of deer browsing Mild Some evidence of browsing; less than 10% of plant browsed Moderate Browsing slightly intensified; 10%-25% of plant browsed Heavy Routine or intense browsing; rnore than 25% of plant browsed Qualitative evaluation of conditions in the reforestation area was also conducted. This evaluation included an inventory of tree and shrub species in the reforestation area, documentation of natural recruitment, identification of areas dominated by invasive species, effectiveness of invasive species management practices, and photo-documentation of the reforestation area. Observations of wildlife use were also noted. Results The following sections summarize monitoring events results for 2006. Table 4 presents data for the May and November 2006 monitoring events. Planted Tree Evaluation Data regarding percent survival, growth, condition, and intensity of deer browsing for trees planted during 2005 are presented below. Percent Survival The survival rate for planted trees in the reforestation area was 85.6 percent during the 2006 growing season. Survival rates in management zones ranged from 76.7 to 96.4 percent and indicate similar viability of planted trees in management zones. No areas of mass natural mortality were observed. Species-specific survival rates for black locust, loblolly pine, and scarlet oak appear similar. It should be noted that numerous loblolly pine trees planted in Management Zone 6 were impacted by a change in land use following the 2005 planting event (Figures 3 and 4) which resulted in a loss of approximately 40 percent of trees initially planted in Management Zone 6. This decrease in survival is reflected in the May 2006 monitoring data and do not reflect natural death of trees in these areas. Furthermore, 00!7118:20.d:>c Mr. Jon K. Bornholm February 22, 2007 Page: 4/8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ARCADIS BBL survival rate data for Management Zone 6 during the November 2006 monitoring event excluded trees included in the area of modified land use. Future data collected for the reforestation area will not include data regarding trees planted in the area of modified land use. Growth Site-wide average tree height at the end of the 2006 growing season was 31.9 inches and management zone-specific average tree height ranged from 23.5 to 47.6 inches. Species-specific average tree height and average growth was as follows: • Black locust-45.7 inches average height; 15.8 inches average growth . • Loblolly pine -39.3 inches average height; 17.9 inches average growth . • Scarlet oak 22.1 inches average height; 2.2 inches average growth . Average growth of planted trees during the 2006 growing season was approximately 10 inches. Average growth within management zones followed trends displayed by species-specific data, and varied between management zones based on the composition of trees planted (i.e., lower growth rates in Management Zones 2, 3, and 4 due to high percentage of scarlet oak planted in these areas). Condition Health of planted trees in the reforestation area was satisfactory, as indicated by the 96.5 percent of planted trees were assessed to be in fair condition or better. Condition was similar between management zones and species. Deer Browsing Intensity Evidence of deer browsing was observed on approximately 40 percent of planted trees in the reforestation area during the May 2006 monitoring event. However, evidence of deer browsing was less than 6 percent in all management zones during the November 2006 monitoring event. Furthermore, data indicate that loblolly pines are preferentially avoided, although a few cases of deer rubs were qualitatively noted (Attachment B). 008111820<b:: Mr. Jon K. Bornholrn February 22, 2007 Page: 5/8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ARCADIS BBL General Reforestation Area Conditions Project area conditions are generally good. Natural recruitment has augmented species composition and density of trees in the reforestation area. Additionally, invasive species prevalence in the reforestation area decreased throughout the 2006 growing season. Natural Recruitment Native tree/shrub species naturally recruiting in the reforestation area are presented in Attachment A. Seedlings and saplings of these species appear healthy and were abundant throughout the reforestation area. At the end of the 2006 growing season, some naturally recruited plants were larger in height and diameter at breast height than planted trees. Figure 3 depicts areas of relatively concentrated natural recruitment by native species. Invasive Species Invasive species identified for control included: Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), wild blackberry (Rubus ursinus), tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), and bittersweet nightshade (Solanum ducamara). Areas dominated by these species are indicated on Figures 3 and 4. Routine application of herbicide to these species during adaptive management activities appears to have reduced the abundance of invasive species in the project area. Observations of wildlife use included visual sightings of turkey and six-lined racerunners, as well as numerous indications (e.g., observations of trails, beds, rubs, scat) of white-tailed deer. Attachment B presents photo-documentation of reforestation area conditions during 2006 and observations of wildlife use. Conclusions and Recommendations Percent survival and condition of planted trees in the reforestation area are satisfactory for growth of a canopied tree cap in OU2. No species-specific or management zone-specific negative trends were noted. Therefore, no changes to the management strategy are necessary to address tree survival or condition. 008711820.00C Mr. Jon K. Bornholm February 22, 2007 Page: 6/8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ARCADIS BBL Growth of planted trees was highest for loblolly pine and black locust, but lower for scarlet oak. Such patterns of growth are expected as loblolly pine and black locust are early colonizer species in an old field succession system, as is present in the OU2 Reforestation Area, and are adapted to grow rapidly in full-sun, drier conditions. Increased growth of these species in comparison to scarlet oak is expected. Therefore, no changes to the management strategy are necessary to address tree growth. Deer browsing in the reforestation area decreased substantially between the May and November monitoring events. The observed decrease is likely due to periodic deer repellent applications to planted trees throughout the growing season. Furthermore, deer are selectively avoiding browsing on loblolly pines in the reforestation area. Prevalence of invasive species in the reforestation area decreased during the 2006 growing season (Figures 3 and 4). This decrease in invasive species prevalence is likely due to periodic herbicide application throughout the growing season. Based on the above observations and conclusions, ARCADIS BBL recommends the following for OU2 Trench Area Reforestation Maintenance and Monitoring Program in 2007. • • • Continue spot application of herbicide to invasive species in the reforestation area . Herbicide applications should occur twice a year, once in late spring and once in early fall. Continue application of deer repellent to deciduous trees planted in the reforestation area. Deer repellent applications should occur twice a year, once in late spring and once in early fall. Deer repellent application need not occur for loblolly pines in the reforestation area. Exclude project area from mowing activities. This will maintain a tall herbaceous layer that will provide cover for seedlings and saplings, thereby reducing predation, and will retain moisture while the tree canopy develops. Postponing mowing activities will also avoid damage to seedlings and trees that are hidden by the taller herbaceous cover, thus promoting natural recruitment. 008111820 lb: Mr. Jon K. Bornholm February 22, 2007 Page: 7/8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ARCADIS BBL • Conduct qualitative and quantitative data collection during fall 2007 maintenance activities. Data collection should include the same elements conducted during 2006. Additionally, quantitative data regarding the height, number, and species of naturally recruiting saplings in the reforestation area that are greater than 36 inches in height should be recorded. Data collected during subsequent monitoring events will be used to evaluate the status of the OU2 Reforestation Area relative to project objectives, assess the effectiveness of current management practices, identify areas not performing as expected, and develop alternative strategies for improvement, if warranted. Please contact me at 925.296. 7812 if you have questions regarding the information presented in this letter. Sincerely, ARCADIS U.S., Inc. ~~ Senior Project Manager Coples: David Mattison, North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources Angela Dohl, National Starch and Chemical Company David Simons, National Starch and Chemical Company Alex Francisco; ARCADIS BBL Gary Markiewicz; ARCADIS BBL 00811,820.doc Mr. Jon K. Bornholm February 22, 2007 Page: 8/8 -- - ---- --------- -- Survival Rate Table 4 OU2 Tree Cap Monitoring Report National Starch and Chemical Company Cedar Springs Road Plant Salisbury, North Carolina Mav 2006 Monitorinc Event Data Relative Health of Live Plants Average Height I Average Growth 1 (% of live plants) {% cateaorized as aood or fair) llnchesl /Inches I By Manaqement Zone Zone 1 84.6 Zone 2 94.3 Zone3 88.7 Zone4 87.9 Zone 5 75.0 Zone 6 59.8 By Species Black Locust 93.8 Loblolly Pine 66.7 Scarlet Oak 87.4 Sitewide 78.9 Survival Rate (% of live olantsl By Manaaement Zone Zone 1 Zone2 Zone 3 Zone4 Zone5 Zone6 By Species Black Locust Loblolly Pine Scarlet Oak Sitewide Notes: NA -Not Applicable % -Percent 76.7 90.0 89.7 82.1 87.9 96.4* 96.6 100.0 90.3 85.6 75.8 25.9 NA 78.8 26.0 NA 63.8 21.0 NA 62.7 19.4 NA 68.8 21.2 NA 87.8 21.6 NA 75.6 29.9 NA 94.3 21.4 NA 61.0 20.0 NA 72.4 22.1 NA November 2006 Monitorina Event Data Relative Health of Live Plants Average Height I Average Growth 1 (% cateaorized as aood or fair) /Inches) {lnchesl 93.5 40.3 14.4 95.6 30.0 4.0 100.0 26.1 5.1 96.6 23.5 4.2 100.0 32.3 11.1 94.3 47.6 26.1 89.3 45.7 15.8 100.0 39.3 17.9 96.4 22.1 2.2 96.5 31.9 9.8 1) Average growth was calculated as the change in plant height between monitoring events. 2) Change in deer browse was calculated as the change in % of plants browsed between monitoring events. Deer Browse Change in Deer Browse2 (Percent} (Percent) 53.8 NA 45.7 NA 69.8 NA 60.3 NA 32.8 NA 19.5 NA 81.3 NA 0.0 NA 64.1 NA 44.1 NA Deer Browse Change in Deer Browse2 fPercentl fPercentl 5.0 -48.8 6.0 -39.7 0.0 -69.8 2.1 -58.3 0.0 -32.8 0.0 -19.5 1.7 -79.5 0.0 0.0 4.3 -59.7 2.3 -41.8 * Trees in Management Zone 6 that did not survive after initial planting due to changes in land use were not included in calculations of November 2006 survival rates, and will not be included in future calculations. 212212007 008711820 Table 4.xls Page: 1/1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ARCADIS BBL Figures I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '----... ~ ~ z ii' Q. ""' \ \ \ \ \ \ ------- \ r \ \ \ I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ "" \ \ \ \ ""' \ \ \ \ \ ~ ""' \ \ >> s" \ \ \ \ I I \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ I \ \ I I I I \ \ I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ I I \ *\ ------- \ \ I I L --- --- oo 0 o/ ---o 0 00 0 0 \ LEGEND: ♦ EXTRACTION WELL LOCATION • APPROXIMATE PLANTING LOCATION (2884 TOTAL) NO TREES PLANTED .. LOBLOLL Y PINE .. SCARLET OAK SCARLET OAK AND BLACK LOCUST NOTE: APPROXIMATELY 1800 TOTAL TREES PLANTED (1000 SCARLET OAK; 300 BLACK LOCUST; 400-500 LOBLOLL Y PINE) SOURCES: -MAP ENTITLED "SITE MAP' PREPARED FOR NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY BY INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, KNOXVILLE, TENN., DATED 5/18/93. -MONITORING WELL SURVEY BY SCHULENBERGER SURVEYING COMPANY, SALISBURY, N.C., DATED 1/21/97 --MONITORING WELL SURVEY BY TAYLOR WEISMAN & TAYLOR, RALEIGH N.C., DATED 3/98 0 100· r----c--------1 GRAPHIC SCALE 200· I NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY CEDAR SPRING ROAD PLANT, SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA OU2 TREE CAP MONITORING REPORT PLANTING LOCATIONS ~ ARCADIS BBL rr~ .. 'P., .r.~ tKJ 1'e5 FIGURE 1 I I I "'\ \ ~ ~ \ \ I I I I ~ I I I I I I I '-----~ \ I I I L ------"" \ I \ I I "" I \ LEGEND: -\ \ \ ---\ ----I -------$-EXTRACTION WELL LOCATION I I \ \ \ \ \ • APPROXIMATE PLANTING LOCATION (2884 TOTAL) \ \ \ / r= NO TREES PLANTED I 0 I / 1111 TREES PLANTED ~ \ u) \ / < \ ~ I t:;:-~:1 AREA OF CONSERVED TREES (APPROXIMATE) ► ~ \_I Q) \ I ~ \ I ~ p ~ AREA COVERED WITH FILL MATERIAL "' \ (APPROXIMATE) N 2 \ ~ 8 \ \ \ A CORNER DESIGNATION N /'~ / I ' \ 0 MANAGEMENT ZONE DESIGNATION T N \ ' I 0 \ I ~ \ i z " Ii: \ \ I 0.. \ e:' ""EX \ ¢ 0 ( ::l \ ~ \ \ "" \ _, ~ 0.. I ~ "" NOTE: Q) ~ \ < >> .... \ z ... ..._____ "" APPROXIMATELY 1800 TOTAL TREES PLANTED (1000 SCARLET 0.. ~ *\ ~ OAK; 300 BLACK LOCUST; 400-500 LOBLOLL Y PINE) I I "'\ \ I "'---"" I s" \ a: "" \ i? \ "" SOURCES: Ill \ \ ~ \ -MAP ENTITLED "SITE MAP' PREPARED FOR NATIONAL STARCH I < \ \ 0.. AND CHEMICAL COMPANY BY INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY 1 \ \ *\ CORPORATION, KNOXVILLE, TENN., DATED 5/18/93. 0 \ \ _, "" "' \ ¢\ --MONITORING WELL SURVEY BY SCHULENBERGER SURVEYING I ~ "' \ \ \ \ COMPANY, SALISBURY, N.C., DATED 1/21/97 ~ ::I "' \ -MONITORING WELL SURVEY BY TAYLOR WEISMAN & TAYLOR, < \ \ \ "' "" \ \ RALEIGH N.C., DATED 3/98 I N 0 \ ,._ I !\ *\ 8 \ \ ~~ '~ I I ~ 0 100· 200· I ~:::-I \ \ r-----,--~ I NO I ';::-~ \ GRAPHIC SCALE o< I ii: VI \ z "' I I \ (' \"" ::l'~ \ I ~~ I 0 0 • In I \ \\"" *\ ~~ r \ \ 0 o/ I NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY Cf 9------o 0 CEDAR SPRING ROAD PLANT, SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA I -\ \ \ \ oc I t::8 \ OU2 TREE CAP MONITORING REPORT o,._ \ .·~ I \ \ \ 0 I 0 \ Z/ OQ.. I er~ I .. I \ \ \ \ SAMPLE DESIGN Ii!!!? I VI "\ I ~o I"" \ 3 ·'-~ "" \ """ ~[ ::I -I \ I I FIG~RE < "'\ \ \ ,✓ ~ " ARCADIS BBL ~g u ··o \ " , .. a~u ~"'""'•·Jt)L"""'11it:f.t0tlei <~ WVI I 5o "'"' z Q.. X I \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I ......._____ \ I l ( ------- I I I "" "" \ I I I \ \ LEGEND: I \ ----\ \ \ ----I -------$-EXTRACTION WELL LOCATION I \ \ \ \ APPROXIMATE PLANTING LOCATION (2884 TOTAL) I \ • \ \ I \ / NO TREES PLANTED I / I g \ I L() \ / 1111 TREES PLANTED < \ t;, I ~ AREA OF CONSERVED TREES (APPROXIMATE) ► "" I I ~ , a, ~ \ \ ~ \__ I I p ~ AREA COVERED WITH FILL MA TERI AL .... \ (APPROXIMATE) N 2 \ 8 \ \ I ~ [ill] AREA DOMINATED BY BLACKBERRY N ~ (APPROXIMATE) I ' \ ... N \ :::-\ § \ \ ~ AREA DOMINATED BY JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE z '-.. (APPROXIMATE) ii: \ 0.. \ I ~ \ \EX-0 \ \ ¢ 0 u ( MANAGEMENT ZONE DESIGNATION ::l \ \ ~ \ ~ \ ..J 0.. ~ I ~ ""-""' NOTE: a, "" \ < >> ... \ z w ""-APPROXIMATELY 1800 TOTAL TREES PLANTED (1000 SCARLET 0.. "' ---~ +\ OAK; 300 BLACK LOCUST; 400-500 LOBLOLL Y PINE) I "---..._ "" \ \ a: "" s" \ ;? \ \ SOURCES: !)j \ w \ " \ -MAP ENTITLED "SITE MAP' PREPARED FOR NATIONAL STARCH < \ \ I 0.. \ AND CHEMICAL COMPANY BY INTERNATION AL TECHNOLOGY :, \ +\ CORPORATION, KNOXVILLE, TENN., DATED 5/18/93. ~ \ \ .3 "" ~ \ -MONITORING WELL SURVEY BY SCHULENBERGER SURVEYING I < "" \ \ \ \ COMPANY, SALISBURY, N.C., DATED 1/21/97 ..J " "' \ -MONITORING WELL SURVEY BY TAYLOR WEISMAN & TAYLOR, < \ \ ¢ "' ~ \ \ \ RALEIGH N.C., DATED 3/98 N I 0 \ .... I A *\ 8 I \ «> -t: ...... I ~ 200· '-.N I 0 100· ~:::-I \ \ 1-------d I I NQ I :::-~ GRAPHIC SCALE ~ Cl> I \ z.,. I \ 0\\ .. I \ :l '! 0 0 I ~.; ( • z I \ \\\ *\ .... \ 0 S-( ~~ r \ NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY ~~ ...____ O 0 CEDAR SPRING ROAD PLANT, SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA I -\ \ \ \ oc ... g OU2 TREE CAP MONITORING REPORT I ~i \ I \ \ \ \ 0 IO \ FIELD SKETCH Z/ oo.. .. ~ \ \ \ \ o::/ I I JULY 11 , 2006 I:'~ I <ii 7\ <U ,.., \ I ..J ~ ''-' .. < "" \ 0 w" ~; " -\ FIGURE < I ""\ \ \ lo /': ~ ARCADIS BBL "'o u ··o 3 «> < lu ab~ ~ ..... ~ f.Jd'"/N!j </ I 5o 0:: o::z o..x I I I I I I I I I I l I I '-----.._ \ I I L --------LEGEND: I I "" \ \ -$-EXTRACTION WELL LOCATION "" I I \ I • APPROXIMATE PLANTING LOCATION (2884 TOTAL) \ -\ I \ ----I ------NO TREES PLANTED I \ \ \ \ \ .. TREES PLANTED \ \ / ~ AREA OF CONSERVED TREES (APPROXIMATE) \ , I / I ~ ~ AREA COVERED WITH FILL MATERIAL < \ \ L() \ / (APPROXIMATE) I= I ► a> "" I ~ AREA OF CONTROLLED BLACKBERRY 2 \ \ r----\___ (APPROXIMATE) I < I ~ re \ 0 \ r----AREA DOMINA TED BY BLACKBERRY 8 \ \ I [ill] (APPROXIMATE) N p I ' \ ... N \ ~ AREA DOMINATED BY JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE )- 0 \ \ (APPROXIMATE) ~ \ z ......... ir \ C§1 a. \ AREAS OF DENSE PINE NA TUR AL RECRUI TMENT I I!! \ \ EX \ \ ¢ u ( 0 ::l \ MANAGEMENT ZONE DESIGNATION ~ \ \ "" ..., \ a. ~ I ~ a> "' "" \ NOTE: ~ >> z \ w a. "' .......__ ~ APPROXIMATELY 1800 TOTAL TREES PLANTED (1000 SCARLET --......... * \ OAK; 300 BLACK LOCUST; 400-500 LOBLOLL Y PINE) I "' ............... "" \ 0: ............... s" \ ;? \ "" SOURCES: II! ~ \ \ I < \ \ \ -MAP ENTITLED "SITE MAP' PREPARED FOR NATIONAL STARCH a. \ AND CHEMICAL COMPANY BY INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY l \ \ * \ CORPORATION, KNOXVILLE, TENN ., DATED 5/18/93. .3 ............... \ ,:.: \ I ~ \ \ -MONITORING WELL SURVEY BY SCHULENBERGER SURVEYING < "' \ \ COMPANY, SALISBURY, N.C., DATED 1/21/97 ..., 2 --...........__ \ < \ \ -MONITORING WELL SURVEY BY TAYLOR WEISMAN & TAYLOR, ,-. "" \ \ \ ¢ RALEIGH N.C., DATED 3/98 N I 0 \ ,-. I )\ 8 *\ N I \ .,, I ~ ...... I 200· ,,.. 0 100· ' I ol!-I \ \ ~----j ! NQ I '~ GRAPHIC SCALE s~ I V> I \ z "' \ I'\""' .. I \ ...,.,, I g~ I 0 0 . z ( \ \\"" *\ ~~ ! \ I OS,( NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY ~ 9-...___. 0 0 CEDAR SPRING ROAD PLANT, SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA I -\ oc I tt ~ I \ \ \ OU2 TREE CAP MONITORING REPORT ".8 \ I . "' \ \ \ 0 Io \ Z / FIELD SKETCH 0 a. .. 'I: \ er/ I I \ \ \ NOVEMBER 16, 2006 \::'I!! lcii 0\ I 5u ,.., \ ,o ~ .. < "" \ w ::>: \ ~[ 2 -I < "'\ \ \ FIGURE ,,.,, I= ~ ARCADIS BBL ~g l;Jci!o \ 4 ~; ot:iiil trha:s:rv.:TJ"'r,rrr,~~OO'De:li I 5 o [~Z I I ARCADIS BBL I I I I I Attachments I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2/22/2007 008711820 Attachment A.xis I Attachment A Naturally Recruiting Tree Species Observed National Starch and Chemical Company Cedar Spring Road Plant Salisbury, North Carolina Common Name Scientific Name birch SP. Betula SP. eastern red cedar Juniperus virqiniana eastern redbud Cercis canadensis qreen ash Fraxinus pennsvlvanica loblolly pine Pinus taeda oak SP. Quercus SP. sassafras Sassafras albidum sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua tulip poplar Liriodendron tulioifera wild black cherry Prunus serotina Page: 1 /1 -------------------Attachment B May 2006 2006 Photographic Log National Starch and Chemical Company Cedar Springs Road Plant Salisbury, North Carolina Photo-Station 1 July 2006 Photo-Station 2 November 2006 -------------------Attachment B May 2006 2006 Photographic Log National Starch and Chemical Company Cedar Springs Road Plant Salisbury, North Carolina Photo-Station 7 July 2006 Photo-Station 8 November 2006 -------------------Attachment B 2006 Photographic Log National Starch and Chemical Company Cedar Springs Road Plant Salisbury, North Carolina Invasive species dead as a result of herbicide application Dense stand of naturally recruited pines and sweet gum -------------------Attachment B 2006 Photographic Log National Starch and Chemical Company Cedar Springs Road Plant Salisbury, North Carolina Deer rubs on planted saplings Six-lined racerunner observed on project area