NCD991278953_20061211_National Starch & Chemical Corp._FRBCERCLA RA_Monthly Progress Report 1987 - 2006-OCR

I
~ ,n ARCADIS ,~mpany
Transmilled Via First Class Mail
December 11, 2006
Mr. Jon K. Bornholm
United States Environmental Protection Agency-Region 4
Atlanta Federal Center
6{F~rsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
Re: Revised RD/RA Monthly Progress Reports -October 2006
National Starch & Chemical Company
Cedar Springs Road Plant Site
Salisbury, North Carolina
BBL Project#: 05007 #8
Dear Mr. Bornholm:
fo) ~ © w il \Yl @ rn)
ml DEC 2 9 2006 l]j)
SUPERFUl~L SECTION
On behalf of National Starch & Chemical Company, Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. is submitting the attached
RD/RA Monthly Progress Reports for October 2006 prepared pursuant to the Consent Decree in the matter of
United States v. National Starch & Chemical Company, Section XI, Paragraph 26, Reporting Requirements
and the Unilateral Administrative Order (U.S. EPA Docket No. 95-35-C), Section XIV, Progress Reports.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or mpf@bbl-
inc.com.
Sincerely,
BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.
Michael P. Fleischner, P.E.
Vice President
MPF/jas
Enclosures
cc: A. Doh!, National Starch & Chemical Company
R. Franklin, National Starch & Chemical Company
D. Rubenstein, National Starch & Chemical Company
R. Steinert, National Starch & Chemical Company
C. Dayton, Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.
'
OPERABLE UNITS ONE ANO TWO
RD/RA MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT -OCTOBER 2006 -
NATIONAi:, STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEQ.A.R SPR.fNGS"RQt,\QP,L.A.NT SITE
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA. · ·
L ACTIONS :f:AKEN :f0:A~HIEVE·C0MP.l:IANCE>W,ITH:ADMINISTRA TIVE ORDER::"-'. '"T:)J-. . i
a. OUI -The Trench Area Extraction _System and_C_om_bined Pre-Treatment Plant,were operating.
NSCC partic.ipated in a m_,;~_ting _wi!h. ]JSEPA_ on ·October 11; 1006 .. ·Meeting'.minutes are
attached.
b. OU2 -NSCC-partjcipated iii a meeting with USEPA on October 11; ·I 006. Meeti1ig min_utes are
attached.
2. SAMPLING AND OTHER TEST DAT A
a. OU! -None.
b. OU2 -None.
3. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED OR ANTICIPATED
a. OU! -None. .
·-.. /. ·•• ,_.
b. OU2 -None.
4. ACTIONS PLANNED FOR NOVEMBER 2006 . ,,.,_ .. ~ , ... ' .. ' .....
a. OUI -' The Trench'-Are:i' Extraction -System and Combined Pre-Treatment Plant will continue
operating. Responses to comments for the Supplemental OU I Remedy Evaluation Report will be
submitted.
b. OU2 -The third maintenance and monitoring event will be conducted for the Trench Area
Reforestation Monitoring Programming.
BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.
"" ARCADIS comr,acy
OPERABLE UNITS THREE AND FOUR
RD/RA MONTHLY !'ROG RESS REPORT -OCTOBER 2006
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLAN:f SITE·
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROUNA' '
. ' · ,, I, ACTIONS·TAKEN TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE'WITH·ADMINfSTRATIVE ORDER: ,; '. ''
a, OU3 -The OU3 Extraction Wells, Groundwater Collection Trench, and Combined Pre-
Treatment Plant were operating. NSCC participated in a meetin·g with USEPA on October 11,
I 006. Meeting minutes are attached.
b. OU4 -NSCC participated in a meeting with USEPA on October 11, 1006. Meeting minutes are
attached.
2, SAMPLING AND OTHER TEST DATA
a. OU3 -None.
b. OU4 -None.
3. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED OR ANTICIPATED
a. OU3 -None.
b. OU4 -None.
4. ACTIONS PLANNED FOR NOVEMBER 2006
a. OU3 -The OU3 Extraction Wells, Groundwater Collection Trerich, and Combined Pre-
Treatment Plant will continue operating. The July 2006 RCRA Post-Closure Groundwater
Monitoring Report will be submitted.
b. OU4 -The OU4 Soil Sampling Work Plan will be prepared to delineate the horizontal extent of
soil impacts.
BLASLAND, BOUCK&. LEE. INC.
,,, ARCADIS rnm0o"v
I
Meeting Minutes
National Starch & Chemical Company
Cedar Springs Road Plant
October 11, 2006
Meeting Participants:
A. Dohl, National Starch & Chemical Company
R. Franklin, National Starch & Chemical Company
D. Rubenstein, National Starch & Chemical Company
R. Steinert, National Starch & Chemical Company
M. Fleischner, Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.
J. Seebald, Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.
E. Rhine, ARCADIS
J. Bornholm, Uniteq St~tes Environmental Protection Agency-Region 4 (USEPA) _ .•. ,.
D. Mattison, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
. The following topics were addressed in the meeting:
I. OU I: Response to comments on the Supplemental OU I Remedy Evaluation Report will be
prepared and submitted to USEPA and NCDENR. The response to comments document will
include the proposed recommendations from the Supplemental OU l Remedy Evaluation Report.
Response to comments will be submitted in December 2007.
2. OU2: Following completion of the maintenance and monitoring event in November 2006, an
annual status letter will prepared detailing the overall status of the restoration area, in respect to
the goal of creating a self-sustaining canopied vegetative cover for OU2. In addition, the letter
will_ discuss the purpose of tree planting activities, species of trees selected, and goals of the
restoration activities. This letter will be submitted in January 2007.
3. OU3: Techniques will be evaluated for locating DNAPL during the annual groundwater
monitoring event.
4. OU4: A work plan will be prepared with proposed additional soil investigation activities for
OU4. Additional soil investigation activities are proposed to delineate shallow soil impacts (less
than l O feet below ground surface [bgs ]). The work plan will be submitted by November 15,
2006. General response to comments on the 2006 Phase II Natural Degradation Treatability ..
Study (NOTS) Five Year Monitoring Report will be prepared and submitted to USEPA and
NCDENR. Response to comments· will be submitted in December 2007.
5.
6,
Following completion of additional soil investigation activities, a Supplemental Feasibility Study
for OU4 will be prepared to evaluate potential remedial action alternatives including:
Shallow Soil Excavation;
Soil Vapor Extraction;
Air Sparging (Passive);
In-Situ Soil Mixing;
ERO Injection; and/or
Persulfate Injections.
Annual Site Monitoring: The Annual Site Monitoring Report (SMR) will include more detail
regarding the status of remedial actions at each OU. In addition, the SMR. will include mor_e
discussion on capture zones and hydraulic control.
~~~\; \m.\l',)'\ \
Five Year Review: USEPA will verify that a Five-Year Review Report needs to be prepared in
2007. lfso, the Draft Five-Year Review Report will be prepared by NSCC.
BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.
"" ARCADIS rnmpapy
• lfllJg_tional Starch and Chemical Corporation
Lumber Street
P.O. Box 399
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
704-633-1731
CERTIFIED KAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Giezelle s. Bennett
Enforcement Project Manager
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Re: National Starch and Chemical Corporation
Salisbury, North Carolina
Cedar Springs Road RI/FS ,
Dear Ms. Bennett:
•
January 5, 1988
In accordance with the Administrative Order on Consent for the referenced site,
attached is the monthly progress report for the RI/FS activities for the month
of December, 1987.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.
REP/js
Enclosure
Sincerely,
NATI~NAL. RCH--AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION
//'... ! ,/' (:'
\ / ._.,.._ ........ .-.a.·•-1;
Ray E. 'Para ow ski
Manager, North Carolina Locations
cc: Mr. A. Samson, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, N.J.
Mr. H. Graulich, National Starch & Chemical Corp:, Bridgewater, N.J.
Mr. R. Alewine, IT Corporation, Knoxville, Tenn.
Enclosure
"Our servirnengineers are available to help purchil5ers obtain best results from our products, and recommendations are based on te~ts and information believed to be reliable.
However, w1: have no control over the conditions under which our products are transported to, stored, handled, or used by purchasers. All recommendation~ and sales arc
made on condition that w,: will not be held liable for any damages resuhing from their use. No representative of ours has any authority to waive or ch.rnge this provision."
. ' ..
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT -DECEMBER 1987
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION RI/PS
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
1. Actions Taken to Achieve Compliance with Consent Order.
° Continued to prepare remedial investigation report. The report will be
finalized and submitted to Region IV EPA no later than
February 1, 1988.
0 Have completed the hazard evaluation for the remedial investigation
report. The hazard evaluation will be included in the RI report to be
submitted to EPA on or before February 1, 1988.
0 Have completed soil geochemical tests. The test results and test
conclusions will also be included in the RI report.
2. Sampling and other test data.
0 There have been minor modifications to the analytical data summary that
was submitted to EPA with the November progress report. The RI report
will include the analytical dat:a summary with the minor corrections
made. Additionally there have been some corrections on detection
levels for various soil and water samples, and these corrections will
also be included with the February 1 submittal.
3. Variances to work plan. Additional field investigative activities.
0 Nothing to report.
4. Activities planned for January 1988.
0 The remedial investigation report will be finalized and will be
submitted to EPA by February 1, 1988. Pending review by EPA and
comments, the feasibility study will be initiated in March 1988. The
feasibility study is to be submitted approximately three months
thereafter. This timetable is contingent upon prompt review and
receipt of comments on the RI report from EPA.
iflJ:!.tional Starch and Chemical Corporation
Lumber Street
P.O. Box 399
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
704-633-1731
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Giezelle S. Bennett
Enforcement Project Manager
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Re: National Starch and Chemical Corporation
Salisbury, North Carolina
Cedar Springs Road RI/FS
Dear Ms. Bennett:
•
November 6, 1987
In accordance with the Administrative Order on Consent for the referenced site,
attached is the monthly progress report for the RI/FS activities for the month
of October, 1987.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.
REP /js
Enclosure
Sincerely,
NA~JONA .--,r-HA CHEMICAL CORPORATION
~~-·<. . d Ray E. Paradowski
Manager, North Carolina Locations
cc: Mr. A. Samson, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, N.J.
Mr. H. Graulich, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, N.J.
Mr. R. Alewine, IT Corporation, Knoxville, Tenn.
Enclosure
''Our servii.:e engineers are available to help purchasers obtain best results from our products, and recommendations are based on tests and information believed to be reliable.
However, we have no control over the conditions under which our products are transported to, stored, handled, or used by purchasers. All recommendations and sales are
made on condition that we will not be held liable for any damages resulting from their use. No representative of ours has any authority lo waive or change this provision."
•
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT -OCTOBER 1987
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION RI/FS
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
•
1. Actions Taken to Achieve Compliance with Consent Order
0 We are continuing to tabulate and assimilate all of the environmental monitoring data representing samples collected in August and September 1987. Data has been tabulated and is currently being reviewed for thoroughness, completeness, and accuracy. It is anticipated that tables of all analytical data representing environmental monitoring data co 11 ected for both Phase I and Phase II of the RI will be forwarded to EPA by mid-November.
0 The EPA quality control samples have been analyzed along with routine environmental monitoring samples and the resulting data is attached to this progress report. This represents EPA quality contra l samples given to IT Corporation during the remedial investigation in July, August and early September 1987 and include GW-NS-18, GW-NS-19, and GW-NS-20.
0 The geochemical soil test program is to be completed by mid-November and the results of the findings will be incorporated into the draft remedial investigation report. This work is being carried out in the IT Geotechnical Laboratory in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
0 The hazard evaluation for the risk assessment is expected to be completed by mid-November. This will be incorporated into the draft remedial investigation report upon completion.
2. Sampling and Other Test Data
0 Please accept this as our third request to receive copies of the analytical data and report for the sampling conducted by EPA on a tributary to Grant's Creek in July 1987. It is imperative that we receive this data before completion of the draft remedial investi-gation report.
0 Analytical data for EPA QC samples is attached as previously discussed.
0 Environmental monitoring data will be I tabulated in final form and forwarded to EPA by mid-November.
3. Variances to Work Plan Additional Field Investigative Activities
0 Nothing to report.
•
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT -OCTOBER 1987
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION RI/FS
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
4. Activities Planned For November 1987
° Complete soil geochemical test.
•
Page 2
° Complete the hazard evaluation portion of the risk assessment as
outlined in the work plan.
0 Begin assimilating data and preparing the RI report for submittal in
early 1988.
·• fi!l;ational Starch and Chemical Corporation
Lumber Street
P.O. Box 399
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
704-633-1731
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Giezelle S. Bennett
Enforcement Project Manager
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Re: National Starch and Chemical Corporation
Salisbury, North Carolina
Cedar Springs Road RI/FS
Dear Ms. Bennett:
•
September 2, 1987
In accordance with the Administrative order on Consent for the referenced site,
attached is the monthly progress report for the RI/FS activities for the month
of August, 1987.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.
Sincerel:.c,
NATION~: ST~H1AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION
( 3,~y {) t fZ, ( /v~/-.. ~( .
/ L)'_ ··-
Ray'--(_ Paradowski
Manager, North Carolina Locations
REP/js
Enclosures
cc: Mr. A. Samson, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, N:J.
Mr. H. Graulich, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, N.J.
Mr. R. Alewine, IT Corporation, Knoxville, Tenn.
Enclosures
''Our ~crvicc engineer~ arc avail;:iblc lo help purchasers obtain best results irom our produc:s, and recommendation, .ire based on tests and information believed to be reliable.
Howt~vcr, we h;ive no control over 1hc comlitions under which our products ;ire trirnsporll.:d lo, ~lorcd, h,1mll,~d. or used by purch,1scrs. All recommendations .ind sales are
m.idcon condition th;i1 we will not b1: /wld li;iblc for ;my dam;igcs resulting from their use. No reprcscni.1tive of our~ has any .1u1hority lo wJive or chJngc this provision."
•
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT -AUGUST 1987
NAT!OllAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
1. Actions Taken to Achieve Compliance with Consent Order
0
0
0
0
0
Submitted Phase II Remedial Investigation Plan to EPA Region IV for
review and approval. EPA subsequently approved Phase II Remedial
Investigation Work Plan with minor revision.
Began implementation of Phase II RI Work Plan on August 10. Phase II
RI activities should be complete by September 5. Samples collected
include six ground ,1ater samples, three surface water, and three
sediment samples.
Executed variances 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17. Variances are attached to
this monthly progress report. Two 14' s were submitted and one was
changed to #17.
The Hazard Evaluation for the risk assessment continues. This work
is expected to be completed by mid-October pending the analytical
data from the Phase II RI.
The geochemical soil test program continues to evaluate the soil
attenuative capacity. This work is being carried out in the IT
Geotechnical Laboratory in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
2. Sampling and Other Test Data
No analytical data has been received for the month of August. It is
anticipated that analytical data from the Phase II RI activities will
be available by October 1, 1987.
Please accept this as notice of our request to receive copies of the
analytical data and report for the sampling conducted by EPA on a
tributary to Grant's Creek in July, 1987.
•
Monthly Progress Report -August 1987
National Starch and Chemical Corporation
Cedar Springs Road
Page 2
Salisbury, North Carolina
3. Variances to Work Plan, Additional Field Investigative Activities
0
0
Variances 13 through 17 are included with this progress report.
Phase II RI Work Plan was amended per request by Giezelle Bennett,
EPA, to reflect the installation of three shallow ground water
monitoring wells and three deep ground water monitoring wells.
Phase II RI Work Plan was changed as requested.
4. Activities Planned for September 1987
0
0
0
0
Documentation of Phase II RI activities will be completed for the
month of September.
We will be assimilating data and information working towards
preparation of the Remedial Investigation report and submission of
this report to EPA in December 1987.
Continue the soil geochemical test.
Continue the hazard evaluation portion of the risk assessment as
outlined in the work plan.
0 Sou.thee.st R>2gion
Kncx .... .-illc., Tcnn~ssec.
Office / __ / Field / X /
?age _1_ of _l_ •
Variance #13
,ject National Starch and Chemical Corp. Rl/FS
, _i e Ct ti O. --'4'-"Q-"'8"'-9,,_24.c........ ________ _
•;2;:,ce I Initiated I Applic2bi;I I ' 0
'Ct:=. 3v Docu.:;e:1.t D~s:::-ivtion of V2:-i,;.nce ?~·i/D:-~!"~~-;~/I:·c:c-2
'11/87 IR. Ale1vine IProject Ope~ations Plan for Remedial Investigation Activides,
I !National Stbrch and Chemical Corporation, Salisbury, North I
I lcarolina, □kcember 1986. p. 5-1, para. #1, line 7. I
I I I I ~
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
! I
I !
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I The Project Operations Plan states that auger l,/c}k,,1.~c~u~/-c'~'.-,)
i flights, auger bits, drilling rods, drill bits)'' r;:(11/s·~~~/.,t-,<;7
I and hollo1·1 stem augers will be cleaned and J · I
I 1·1rapped with aluminum foil to prevent contamin~tion
I during storage and/or transport to the field.
I This variance is submitted to allov✓ the above
I referenced equipment/parts to be wrapped with
I clean plastic sheeting (visqueen) instead of
I aluminum foil. This v✓ill be much easier to dol
landl'1ill t L . l l l not ear or pun·ure as eas1 y as a umnnum
foil 1·1hile ensuring that the eauipment remains!
I clean.
I
IT COR.PORATIOI!
Southeast Region
Knox-ville> Tenoessee
V A.R.LAR CE LOG ·
Office / / Field / XX /
Page _l__ of _1_ •
Variance 1114
', o j e c t ___ ~Nc.;ae.;te.cie,o""n~a,_,l___,,S..et"'a-"-r"'-c h,.,._,&,,__,C'-'h,.,e..,m,.,i'-"c~a~l---"C"'-o~.----------------------'---
·:-eject No. 408924
ariaoce Initiated
Date By
l/13/87 IP. Tardona
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Applicab.lel
Docu:Jent Descriotion of Variance I A=roved
p;1/Date I OAO/D2te
IPoP I When
/pg. 10-1 I at a
drilling well NS-22. bedrock was encounteJed
feet. Because of the shallow saprolitic I
I / 1a er, this well will be constructed in a
lwork Plan I different manner than the other shallow wells.
I Well NS-22 will be rock cored until a 10-foot I
I water column is reached. At that point well
I Amendment j construction will follow the same procedure as I
I to RI/FS those of the shallow wells.
I Work Plan
I pg. 2
• IT COR.?OUTIOIT
Southe.est R~gion
Knoxville.> 'IeIJ.n~ssec
VARIAN CT LOG ·
Office / / Field / X /
• ?age 1 of 1
Variance 1115 1~oject National Starch and Chemical Corporation -----'-------------'------------------
-
-
-
-
-
~eject No. 408924
2~iancej Initiated
Date By
itppliccblel I . .!i.::""D:r-oved
Docu~ent D2sc=iotion of Variance P~!/Date !OAO/D~c~
17/87 JR. Alewine !work Plan rbr the Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Studt, / I / National stlarch & Chemical Corporation, Cedar Springs Road ) Plant, SalJsbury, North Carolina) by IT Corporation, / December, 1/986. Section 2.13, page 2-11, paragraph !12, / line 2. I
I I
I lrhe Work Plan states that the stabilization I eriod between well installation and well /sampling will be approximately four weeks. Thi6
I )variance j_s submitted to allow a one week I /stabilization period for the six monitoring ! !wells installed in the Phase II RI as outlined I /in the Amendment to the RI/FS Work Plan. / I I I I
l
I
,':
IT COR.PORATIO!i
Southeast Region
Knoxville, Tennessee
VilUNC'E LOG·
Office / / Field / X /
Page 1 of 1
Variance 1116
?reject National Starch & Chemical Co.
?reject No. _4~0~8~9~2~4:__ __________ _
Variance Initiated Applicable I Ai:roroved Date By Document Des:rintion of Variance P~!Date I OAC/Dace i/18/87 IP. Tardona / Work Plan Deep wells are stipulated to have 20-foot I I I pg. 2.2 I screens. This variance is submitted to consttucn I I I I well NS-25 with a 10-foot screen. A loose, kto({i'l,.(n ,. I I QAPP I sandy bedrock zone was encountered from the ·, '-5(/Z0/2 r7 I I pg. 3(2) batten of the outer casing (53 feet) to 71 fett. / ' I 3(3) Drilling continued another 10 feet to 81 feetf
Once the rods were pulled, the well caved in j
POP 11 feet. Therefore, the bottom of the screen/
pg. 10-1 is at 70 feet. A 20-foot screen would place
the screen in the grouted zone. Since this
grout would significantly affect the ground
water in this interval, it is necessary to
construct this well with only 10 feet of scre~ns,
placing it along the 60-to 70-foot interval./
I
I
• S00~~11:: .. 2.st ?,e.gicn
!~nox--·,,ill,;:..> Te2ucssee. .
Office /--/ ?ield / X /
• ?age -I-of -L_
Variance #17
·ojecc National Starch and Chemical Coro. RI FS
0 i C:: t }i O, --41IB..~4,__ _______ _
-' =~-o) Initiated I ·"·??lic.sblel ;:;;~-/ Bv Doc~~2~t I A=:-o·,ed
P~l/Dace /OAO/Date
I I I I I The work lan states that the boreholes 1;J;. u.n,:0U!'/f)f1.J · I I
I I
I for the deeo wells wi7l be over-reamed 1;ith an.I ,c/11/,;:7 l"~~;,;-'.{7 I air rotary rig. This variance is submitted I ' ' I I I I al lo1•1inc1 the field supervi sor/qeoloqist the I I I I I flexibility not to over-ream the borehole if I I I he/she is confident that the 1·1ell can be set I I j without over-reaming. The bedrock is extremely I I I competent and very hard making the othen;ise I I I I simple procedure of over-reaming very difficul~ I I I and time coos urning for this i I I
I I
I I
I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
• • ~tional Starch and Chemical Corporation
Lumber Street
P.O. Box 399
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
704-633-1731
Ms. Giezelle s. Bennett
Enforcement Project Manager
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
•
April 8, 1987
Re: National Starch and Chemical Corporation
Salisbury, North Carolina
Cedar Springs Road RI/FS
Dear Ms. Bennett:
In accordance with the Administrative Order on Consent for the referenced site,
attached is the monthly progress report for the RI/FS activities for the month
of March, 1987.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.
REP/js
Enclosure
cc: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Enclosure
A.
H.
R.
Sincerely,
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION
J!lay/~~ft,
Ray E. Paradowski
Manager, North Carolina Locations
Samson, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, N.J.
Graulich, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, N.J.
Alewine, IT Corporation, Knoxville, Tenn.
"Our servicze engineers are available to help purchasers obtain best results from our products, and recommendations are based on tests and iniormatinn believi)d to he reli,1bl,~
However, we have no control over the conditions under which our products are transported to, stored, handled. or used by purchasers. :\II recommend,llior;; and ~ale, ,,re
made on condition that we will not be held li,ible for any damages resulting from their use. No representative oi ours has ,lily authoritv to waive 01 change thi, provbi(,n."
•
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT -MARCH 1987
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION RI/FS
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
1. Actions Taken to Achieve Compliance with the Consent Order:
0 Constructed five soil borings and completed composite soil sampling
for the five boreholes in the trench area.
0 Constructed seventeen ground water monitoring wells including
fourteen shallow wells and three deep ground water monitoring wells.
0 Completed surface water and sediment sampling at four surface water
and six sediment points.
0 Collected background soil sample for geochemical testing.
0 Received and forwarded five EPA Quality Control samples to IT
Analytical Services for analysis. Samples include the following:
Sample No.
SW 07
(water blank)
SW 08
(water spike)
SW 09
(water control
sample)
SE 07
(sediment blank)
SE 08
(sediment spike)
Water
Water
Water
Sediment
Sediment
Analysis Requested
Volatile organics, base neutral and
acid extractables, pesticides and
PCB's, metals, and cyanide
Volatile organics, base neutral and
acid extractables, pesticides and
PCB's, metals and cyanide
Metals
Volatile organics, base neutral and
acid extractables, pesticides and
PCB' s, metals, cyan,ide, and phenols
Base neutral and acid extractables,
and pesticides and PCB's
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT -MARCH 1987 2
NATIONAL STARCH AND .ICAL CORPORATION RI/FS
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD • SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
2. Sampling and Other Test Data:
0
0
0
Quality control sample run on deionized water used for field
investigative activities.
in April.)
( To be forwarded with analytical data
Quality control sample run on
field investigative activities.
data in April.)
pesticide grade, isopropanol used in
(To be forwarded with analytical
Soil, surface water, and sediment analytical data expected between
April 15 and May 1, 1987.
3. Variances to the Work Plan and Additional Details on Field Investigative
Activities:
0
0
0
0
0
0
Variances 6, 7, 8, and 9 are attached.
Revisions to Variances 1 and 2 are attached.
A bentonite grout mixture was not used to grout the annulus of ground
water monitoring wells 3, 4, 5, 12, 13, and 14. (See Variance #9.)
This procedure was initiated in the presence of the EPA On Scene
Coordinator ( OSC), Mr. Marty Mosier, and ceased after another osc,
Brian Klenk, replaced Mr. Mosier. Reasons for this deviation from
the Work Plan are detailed in Variance #9.
There has been considerable discussion concerning the time required
for the bentonite seal in the monitoring well annulus separating the
grout and sand around the well screen to properly set. A specific
time was not indicated in the Work Plan. IT Corporation has taken
care to insure that all monitoring wells are constructed properly.
Various waiting times have been observed depending on the EPA OSC
present. IT Corporation is confident that an adequate time has been
observed on all wells for the bentonite seal to properly set.
Sample SW-09-1 (EPA QC sample) was shipped to ITAS per EPA request.
Analysis requested was dissolved metals; however, the sample was
preserved in the field with nitric acid. Total metals will be run on
sample since nitric acid will cause more metals to go into the
solution.
An update of all variances to the Work Plan is submitted with this
progress report.
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT -MARCH 1987 3 NATIONAL STARCH AND-MICAL CORPORATION RI/FS
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD W • SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
4. Activities Planned for the Month of April 1987:
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pump tests on selected monitoring wells will be conducted the week of
April 6, 1987.
Well dedicated bladder pumps will be installed the week of
April 6, 1987.
Shallow monitoring wells will be developed the week of March 30, 1987.
Deep monitoring wells will be developed the week of April 6, 1987.
The first set of ground water samples will be collected the week of
April 20, 1987.
Data analysis and interpretation, including the Risk Assignment, will
begin as soon as analytical data is received in April 1987.
The second round of ground water samples will be collected the week of
July 13, 1987.
• Southeast Region
Knoxitille, Tennessee
V AR.IARCT LOG ·
Office / / Field / x /
Variance Ill •
'roject ____ _;_N:.:a:.:t:.:i:.:o:..:n:::a::.l::_S~t.'.!a.:.r.::c:.:h"--"a"-n,.,d:......:C:.:h.:.;e:.:m"-1=-·c=a-"l-"C'-"o'-'r--'p'-'.~-'RC.e:;;m::oe=d-"i-"a'-'l'-'Ic,.n._,v,_,e~s'-'t"-1"'·g"a"-"-t,.i,.o.!.!n-"F-"e'-a'-'sui..,b1...i.._l.._1i,.;·t.._y:,_S"-l..t\ll.l1J.dy:L-
'!"eject No. 403924
aria.nee Initiated Applicable I A=roved Date Bv Document Desc~iotion of Variance P~/Date /OAO/Date
2/23/87 IR. Alewine I POP -On Page 6-7 of the Project Operations Plan I I I !National the sample containers for the various'Analvtidal I
!search and tests are s~ecified. It .; ... ---------~ _. · ,.1,,. ..... I I I chemical I the fo llowin<> chan~es ' 1JJC,<),);1J-f'l! £1/)]jI.j
in those containers I lcornoration be made. '
I IRI/FS I '-,;i../;z..1/lJ,, "__,_;,/4-81
I I dated 12/86 1. Base neutral and acid extractables I I
J and samples for pesticid~s ~nd-PCBs I
J will be collected in the same cont~iner .. j
--~-'-------'--------''--....:cTcch-=i-=s-'w..:ic:lc:l:......:b:.;e:_o::.n=e_,,g"'a'-'l"l'-'o"na....:a:.:m""b::.e=r_.,g-"l-"a-"s-"s"-----'-'-------'-----
1 jar with teflon liner. I
I I I 2. Phenols will be collected in a one I
liter amber lass ·ar with tef I
closure. Original proposed for two
I
I Zttif ~ I i 2-))-f")
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I -•: I I
I I
I I I
.,
ariaoce Initiated
Date Bv
2/23/87 R. Alewine
I
I
I
I
I
Southeast Region
• Knoxville, Tennessee
V A.R.I.ARCT LOG ·
Offic:e / / Field / x /
Variance lt2
.Revision #1 3/18/87
App lic:ab le I Ai:-:,roved
Doc:um<ent Descriotion of Variance P~/Date /OAO/Date
POP On Pa2e 6-5 Section 6.2 it is stated that Po {&,,JI Jr.('f.d; Ill.
12/86 jas soon as pH conductivity and temperature ;i.,.i.1-/i? I~-,r.-i
jmeasurements have stabilized during purging I I
of the deep wells the samples will be collecte6 I
from the tubing of the bladder pump directly I I
the I I .. into appropriate containers. In order
·Ito.be more consistent with the ground water
!sampling program for the shallow wells; it
lis pro osed that the sam le from the
!deep wells be first emptied into a large
lteflon container. The sample will then be I
!thoroughly mixed and all samples, sample
!duplicates, and splits will be taken frorit the I
teflon container insurin that all sam les
are representative and uniform quality. A
!glass con~ainer may be substituted for the
samples except volatile organics (voes). voe
!containers (40 ml vials) will be filled
!directly with the bailer or the pump to mini-
Jmize the loss of any volatile contaminants.
!Also, a minimum of 3 volumes of water in the
well casing (where possible) will be removed
(continued on second sheet)
..
••
•
•
Ii
!I----
• •
before pH·, temperature, and conductivity
are measured. This revision is made in
accordance with EPA's request .
Variance #2
Revision #1
3/18/87
·I • Southeast Region
Knoxville, Tennessee
VA.RI.ANO: LOG
Office / __ / Field /x/
Variance 113 • Revision #1 3/17/87
:oject. _____ N_a::..:t.:i.:o:.:n:.:a:.:l~S:..:t:..:a:..:r:..:c:..:h.:......a:..:n:..:d.:......C_h_e_m_i_c_a_l_C_o_r_p:_. __ R_e_m_e_d_i_a_l_I_n_v_e_s_t_i-"g'--a-t_i_o_n_F_e,;..a=.s:...:.i:..:b.::i.::l.::i.::t'"y-=S..:t..:u:..:d:.;y __
:-oject No. 408924
t riacce
Date
2/23/8~
Initiated ApDlicablel
Bv Document DescriDtion of Variance
R. Alewine I POP ~n Page 6-7, section 6.5 of the POP the i 12/86 ~reservatives for all of the containers
~sed in the environmental monitoring program
~re specified. It is further stated that
~reservatives will be added to the cont~iners I
kn the laboratory before containers are I
~hipped to the site unless otherwise noted. J
Irr is proposing that only the preservatives I
lfor the volative organics analyses be added
ko the container in the laborator
I
rior
I
Ito sample collection. The preservatives
~or the remaining containers will be added to
!the sample upon receipt of the sample at the
l1aboratory. ·All samples will be received by
Irr Analytical Services within 24 hours of
bampl~ collection. All preservatives will be
~dded to the. s~mple immediately upon rece'ipt
~t the laboratory
~olatile
with the exception of
analyses.
3/17/87 I Preservatives will be added to the containers
I in the laboratory before the containers are
I shipped to the site except for the nitric aci~
I preservative for metals. Nitric acid will be I
placed in the container at the site before th
(continued on next sheet)
I A1'"Jroved
" -· ~ • • ., Variance #3
Revision #1 3/17/87
sample is collected. This revision
is made in accordance with EPA's request.
•
•• •
J....I. 1-..v~ v.u..-.-... ..1..v~,
Southeast Region
Knoxville, Tennessee
V AJUANCE LOG ·
Office / / Field / X /
rage or • Variance No. 4
?roject. ___ N_a_t_i_o..:n..:a..:1..:-..:S..:t:..:a:..:r:..:c:..:h.:....:a:..:n..:d::_.:.C..:h..:e..:m..:i..:c..:a_l_C..:o:_r:_pc.oc:..:.r..:a..:t_i..:.o_n;,_R_I...;/..:F:..S:..... _________________ _
?:-eject No. 408924
/a.riance Initiated Applicable
Date Bv Document Desc:.-intion of Variance
I A=roved
P~/Date IOAO/Dace
2/25/8~ Tom Smith Pro·ect Sections 7. 8, and 9 of the Project
I Operations I Plan, dated December 1986, Detailed Decon-
I Plan, Dec. tamination Procedures for Well Casin and
I 1986 Screen, for Environmental Sampling Equipment, I
and for Protective Equipment and Clothing.
This variance is submitted for a deviation
from the approved decon procedure. The
existing decon procedure includes a wash
with a trisodium phosphate detergent using
hot water, a rinse with hot ta water, a
rinse with deionized water, a rinse with
peiticide grade isopropyl alcohol, and
allow the isopropyl alcohol to air dry.
The revised decon procedure will consist
I of a wash with a trisodium phosphate
d_etergent with cold water, a rinse with -1 I
cold tap water, another wash with a tri"
sodium phosphate detergent and cold water,
a rinse in cold tap water, a rinse with
d e1.on1.ze d water. a rinse - h wit oest1.c1 e
I I j grade ' isooronvl alcohol, and then allow I I I __ , the alcohol to air dry from the equioment. I ' I I This variance is submitted because a source I
I I of hot tap water at the decon area at Cedar I I
Springs Road plant is no longer_ available. I
I I
!
• Southeast Region
Knoxville, Tennessee
V A.RIANCE LOG ·
Office / / Field / X /
Project National Starch and Chemical Corporation RI/FS
Project No. --~4~0~8~9~2~4 _________ _
• Variance No. 5
Variance Initiated Applicable I Ac-craved Date By Document Desc:-intion of Variance PX/Date IOAO/Date
2/26/87 Tom· Smith Project In Section 6.1 and 6.3 of the POP and in I I
Operations Appendix A, Section 3.3 of the QAPP, it is I /,, I
I Plan (Dec. stated that soil and sediment samples will ~ /JI ,.,; aid /JI m,,.J
I 1986) be· composited using a Teflon spoon. This I ~i.71 r/712-Z1-J?7
I Section 6.1 variance ·is being submitted to substitute a I . I
I and 6.3 I stainless steel spoon for a Teflon spoon. I I
Oualitv I All compositing of soil and sediment will be / I
I Assurance I as described in the Project Operations Plan I I
I Proiect I with the exception that a stainless steel I I I Plan spoon will be used to mix the soil and sedi-I I
I (A 29 I ment sample. ug. , .
I 1986 > I
/ Append ix A/
•
I i I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I I I r I I I I I ,
I I I I
I I
J..".L." ~UA.rU.r...Ai..L.U.N
Southeast Region
Knoxville, Tennessee
VARIAN CE LOG ·
Office / / Field / X /
Project National Starch & Chemical Co.
Project No. 408924
Page _.L_ of 1
.Variance No. 6
Variance
Date
Initiated Applicable
Bv Document
I At-craved
2-27-87 I Tom Smith Work Pla Sect·
Dated
I December
I 1986 feot column of water has been encountered
whichever is dee er. This variance is submitted
to remove. the stipulation that re uires the
comp 1 ete depth to be t'he deeper of the two
criteria noted. A we 11-defi ned sha 11 ow water~
I bearing zone exists at a significant depth •·: above the 45-foot depth, furtherdrilling is nh I necessary to construct a representative well. I
I I The deletion of the requirement to drill to a I
I I minimum of 45-feet will enable the field I I
I supervising personnel to properly construct t~e
I I remaining shallow wells. I
I I I I I I
I I i I I (Variance also arn,lies to nai,:e 3 ( 2) of
Appendix A of Quality Assurance Project I I
I ' I Plan and page 10-1 of the Project Operations I
I Plan.)
I • ~,--+---+------'-----+-----+--
. IT CORPOR.ATIO!I
•· Southeast Region
Page 1 of _l_
• Variance No. 7 Knoxville, Tennessee
VARIAN CE LOG ·
Office / / Field / X I.
Project National Starch & Chemical Co.
Project No. 408924
Variance Initiated Applicable I A=roved · Date Bv Document Descriotion of Variance P~/Date /OAO/Date
3/4/87 P. Tardona I Work Pl an Deep wells are stipulated to have 20-foot I I I I Section 2.: screens. This variance is submitted to con-I I I Page 2.8 struct well NS-15 with a ten-foot screen. A I I I Dated loose, sandy bedrock zone was encountered at I ~ I I I December 8 77 feet, causing the drill rods and rock l754 ~ vi I J;l}_ ii/ 171.. .,
I I I coring .bits to become locked into place. I -. <I", u / g 71 v::? -I /,I " e'
I I . Further drilling could not be attempted . Thi~ ' ' I loose zone 1s only 21 feet below the bottom I
I or tne outer casing. 1n1s casing was grouted!
into place, with some grout poss101y extenarnp
severa I feet be I ow the bottom of the cas mg. I
A 20-toot screen on this wel I would place thel
I I I screen within this grouted zone. Since the I I grout would significantly affect the ground
I water w,ithin the interval·, it is necessary
to construct the well with only 10 feet of
screens, placing it along the 67-77 foot
i nterva 1 .
(Variance also applies to page 3(2) and 3(3)
I of Appendix A of the Quality Assurance Project
Plan and a e 10-1 of the Project Operations
Plan)
-,
IT CORPORATION Page 1 of 1
• Southeast Region
Knoxville, Tennessee • Variance No. 8
V A.RIANCE LOG ·
Office / / Field / X /
Project National Starch and Chemical Corporation Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Project No. _ __;4~0~8~9=2_4 _________ _
~7ariance
Date
3/17 /8'
I
I
I
I --
I
I
I
Initiated Applicable'
Bv Document
R. Alewin¢ Project
I r\T,erations
I Plan dtd.
I Dec. 1986
I Onalitv
I Assurance
Pro.1ect
I Plan dtd. I
Aug. 1986 I
and I
I w--'-p, --I
I dtd. I
Descrintion of Variance I A=roved
P~/Date IOAO/Date
Throughout the Project Operations Plan, the I/
Work Plan, and the I // Quality Assurance Project 1£' J
Plan, it is stated that decontamination will -~
be achieved utilizing a low phosphate deter-I I
gent. This detergent includes tri-sodium I
phosphate at low levels. EPA has requested
that a detergent be uti.lized that doe:3 not
contain any phosphate. As a result, this I
variance is submitted to identify the no-
phosphate detergent that will be used in a11I
decontamination work. The detergent is
Liquinox and contains no phosphate. This
r.1,:., • , ((J. hJJt1.. ~
7 ('j R' 1. f-.to-8'
I , I
I
I
I
Dec. lOR6 I detergent will be utilized as soon as ,it canl
be delivered on site, anticipated to be no I
later than March 23, 1987. As a result, allj
decon procedures begfnning on or after I
March 23, 1987 will utilize the no-phosphate
detergent. It should be noted that no water!
or sediment samples have been collected or I
are anticipated to be collected prior to I
I i I ' March 23, 1987. I I I
I I I I
I
• !I CORPORATION
Southeast Region
Knoxville, Tennessee
V A.R.IANCT LOG ·
Office / / Field / X /
Page 1 of 1 •· Variance No. 9
?reject National Starch & Chemical Co.
?reject No. 408924
;1ariance Initiated Applicable
1/F
At:uroved Date Bv Document Desc!"iotion of Variance Date /OAO/Date
3/23/871 T. SMith NSCC Work The Work Plan and POP state that the ~ 1/U IL~,P./tJ,,f/~. I Plan, shallow ,1ells will be sealed with a ':? :J1 {114-1-8? ·--I Section tremie-placed bentonite/cement slurry I .,
12.12, along the annulus. This variance is I I I I Paire 2-9: being submitted to allow the nlacement of I I I I POP, a cement grout by non-tremie means in the I I
I Section remaining shallow ,1ells. I,
I 10.0 I page 10-1
Shallow ,1ells NS-03, 04, 05, 12, 13, and 14
exhibited a very dry vadose zone above the .1
I shallow saturated zone. Sand ,1as placed I
within and 2-4 feet above the saturated I
zone to allow for seasonal water table I
I
fluctuations. Subsequently, bentonite I
pellets were installed atop the sand (and I I within the dry vadose zone) and ,1ater was I I I added to facilitate swelling. As a result, I . I I I I the groutinec of the annulus consistentlv I I
I I occurred within the very drv vadose zone I I I I at depths as shallow as 4 feet. Due to the I I
extreme dryness of the vadose zone, ben-
I I I ' tonite will not be added to the cement on I
I I the remaining shallow ,1ells that exhibit I I __ ,
' I I I I these drv intervals. It is nuestionable
I I whether the bentonite ,1ill adequately I I
hydrate in the dry shallow subsurface
resulting in an inadequate grout seal.
Additionally, the shallo,1 cement interval
will not be tremie-placed; mixing and
pouring the cement into the shallow annuli
,1ill be sufficient to seal the borehole.
Ci
lfl:!_tional Starch and Chemical Corporation
Lumber Street
P.O. Box 399
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
704-633-1731
Ms. Giezelle S. Bennett
Enforcement Project Manager
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Re: National Starch and Chemical Corporation
Salisbury, North Carolina
Cedar Springs Road Rl/FS
Dear Ms. Bennett:
•
March 6, 1987
In accordance with the Administrative Order on Consent for the referenced site,
attached is the monthly progress report for the RI/FS activities for the month of
February, 1987.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.
REP/js
Enclosure
Sincerely,
NATIONALS ARCH & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Ray E. P owski
Manager, North Carolina ·Locations
cc: Mr. A. Samson, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, N. J.
Mr. H. Graulich, Natior,ial Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, N. J.
Mr. R. Alewine, 1T Corporation, Knoxville, Tenn.
Enclosures
"Our service engineers are available to help purchasers obtain best results from our products, and recommendations are based on tests and information believed to be reliable.
However, we have nu control over the conditions under which our products are transported to, stored, handled, or used by purch<lsers. All recommendations and sales are
made on condition that we wil I not be held liable for any damages resulting from their use. No representative of ours has any authority to waive or change this provision."
•
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT -FEBRUARY 1987
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION RI/FS
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
1. Action taken achieving compliance with the consent order:
•
•
•
•
•
Mobilized all project team personnel, subcontractors, and other
participants to begin field work on February 23, 1987. This included
procurement of all subcontractor services, procurement of all materials
and supplies to complete construction of ground water monitoring wells
and to conduct environmental sampling •
Assembled at site on February 23, 1987 for Health and Safety training
conducted by IT Corporation and training and orientation by National
Starch and Chemical Corporation personnel .
Addressed all site logistical requirements to ensure that a
decontamination area was established; to ensure that all residual I
materials from decon procedures and well construction were properly
stored; and, to ensure that the quality of all field work and safety
aspects of field work were properly addressed •
Per EPA directive, we assembled an addendum to the quality assurance
project plan that covered all references to IT QA manuals. This
addendum was prepared as a volume 2 to the quality assurance project
plan and distributed to all project personnel, National Starch and
Chemical personnel, and to the EPA project officer .
Through February' 1987 five variances have been prepared and submitted
to EPA for approval. These variances represent devia_tion from the work
plan and supporting documents. They have tentatively been approved by
the EPA representative and are submitted along with this progress
report for EPA records.
'\
• •
Page 2
2. Sampling results and other test data. A-sample of the deionized water was
collected and shipped to the IT Analytical Services on February 26, 1987.
In addition, a sample of the pesticide grade isopropanol was collected and
analyzed for volatle organics. These two samples are quality control
samples to ensure that the deionized water and pesticide grade isopropanol
I are contaminant free. Analyses should be available by the third week of
March.
3. Plans and procedures completed and plans scheduled for next month.
0
0
0
0
We will continue the construction of the monitoring wells through
March 1987, hopefully completing well construction by the first of
April. We will complete the five soil borings in the trench area
towards the end of March.
We will conduct ,forface water and sediment sampling the week of
March 23, 1987.
' We will conduct ground water sampling the week of April 20, 1987 and
July 13, 1987.
We will be collecting the soil sample for geochemical testing the
month of March and will be forwarding the sample to the ITAS laboratory
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
'j
\'ariance Initiated Applicable
Date Bv Document
2/23/87 R. Alewine I POP -
/National
!search and
I chemical
lcor'"'orat;on
i IRr /FS
I /dated 12/86
• Southeast Region
Knoxville, lenneseee
• ,rage ----=-of
Variance #1
l
V illiNCE LOG
Office / / Field / x /
Descriotion of Variance I A!:'tlroved
P~/Dace /OAO/Dace
On Page 6-7 of the Project Operations Plan I I
the sample containers for the various AnalvciJa1 I
tests are snecified. Tt-ic _.,.;,,,--. .... ► .... .l ►'--.t-I I
the followinP chanoes in those contairiers 1M-c,u,,,,J4 .u1;}L/ be made.
'-;i.J ;i .. :1../r?,, _,. ~ /4 -g 1
1. Base neutral and acid extractables I I
and samples for pesticides and PCBs I I
will be collected in the same container. I I
This will be one gallon amber glass I I
jar with teflon liner. I I / I I
2. Phenols will be collected in a one I I
liter amber lass ·ar with e I
closure. Original proposed for two I
?-))-f
\
Southeast Region
Knoxville, Tennessee
V lJUANCT LOG
Office / / Field / x /
cf
Variance 112
Project. ____ ~N~a=t~i~o~n~a~l__::S~t~a~r~c~h.,__,a~n~d::.....C=h~e~m~i~c~a~lc...,C~o~r~pe..:...-_R~e~m=e~d~i~a~l_.I~n~v~e~s~t~i~g~a~t~i~o~n"-'F~e~a~s=ib"-'-i~l~i~tiY--"S~t~u~d~y'--
,., 408924 Project .. o.
Variance Initiated Applicable I Ac-oroved Datte Bv Document Descrintion of Variance P~/Date IOAO/Date
2/23/87 R. Alewine POP On Page 6-5 Section 6. 2 it is stated that JJJic,,J,;,kJ.74; /11,
I 12/86 as soon as pH conductivity and temperature ~-H·/! 71 :, .:1/,·t
I measurements have stabilized during purging I I
I lof the deep wells the s~mples will be collecte6 I
I I from the tubing of the bladder pump directly .1 I
linto the appropriate containers. In order
Ito be more consistent with the ground water
I sampling program for the shallow wells;, it
lis proposed that the sample from the
ldeep wells be first emptied into a lar e
lteflon container. The sample will then be
lthoroughly mixed and all samples, sample
jduplicates, and splits will be taken frcim the
teflon container insurin that all sam les
are representative and uniform qualit . A
lglass cont~iner may be substituted for the
teflon container.
I
I I
n·co;::0LJ.-:.-10N
Southeast Regioo
Knoxville, Tennessee
V !JUAN CT LOG
Office / __ / Field / X /
o:
Variance ffJ
'roject _____ N...:a:..:t:..:i:..:o:..:n.:.a:..:.l_S:..:.ta:..:.r.:c:.:h-=a.:.n:.:d~C:.:h:.:e:.:m:.:i:.:c:.:a:.l:_C:.:.o:.r!:p.:.._.:.R:.:e:.:m:.:e:.:d:.:i:.:a:.:l:.._I:cn;.;.v.:..e=s.:.t.:.i
2g.:.a..:t..:i..:o.::nc...:.F..:e:.:a:.:s:.:1:.:· b:.1:.· l:.1:.· :.ty'-S:.:.t::u::dLy_
408924
'a.riaoce Initiated Applicable' l A""roved Date Bv Document Desc~iotion of Variance P~I/Date_ I OAO/~~/ 2/23/8 R. Alewine POP bn Page 6-7, section 6.5 of the POP. the 1/;Jfi v", A' /I/ i 12/86 fpreservatives for all of the containers ,/1, .~7 L,-;z_c,. f7 I ~sed in the environmental monitoring program I . I I jare specified .. It is fu·rther stated that I I I /pre~e~vatives will be added to the containers I I I lin the laborator~ ~efore containers are I I
~hipped to the site unless otherwise noted. I
lrT is proposing that only the preservatives )
~to the container in the laborator rior j
lea sample collection. The preservatives I
!for the remaining containers will be added to /
lche sample upon receipt of the samnle at the I
l1aboratory. All samples will be received by
JrT Analytical Services within 24 hours of
barn le coll~ction. All reservatives will be I dded to the sam le immediate! t
~t the laborator with the exce tion of
~olatile
.I
. I
Southeast Region
f..ncx,,.ille, 1eoneseee
Vill.ANCT LOG
Office / / field /_!:_j
•
r.:..ge. J
Variance No. 4
or
Project National Starch and Chemical Corporation RI/I'S
P ~ o j ec t No. ___ 4c.;Oc.:8c.:9c.:2:..c4'-----------
'\'.arianc:e
Date
2/25/8~
I
I
I
Initiated
Bv
Tom Smith
Applic;blel
Document
I Pro ·ect
f Operations I
Desc=iotion of Variance
I · At"Oroved
P~/Date /OAO/Date
Sections 7, 8, and 9 of the Project Operationb
Plan, dated December 1986, Detailed D!'con~
I Plan, Dec. I tamination Procedures for Well Casin · and
I 1986 Screen, for Environmental Samp 1 ing Equipment, I
and for Protective Equipment and Clothing.
This variance is submitted for a deviation
from the approved decon procedure. The
existin rocedure includes a wash
with a trisodium phosphate detergent u·sing
hot water, a rinse with hot tap water, a
rinse with deionized water, a rinse with
pedticide grade isopropyl alcohol, and
allow the isopropyl alcohol to air dry.
The revised decon procedure will consiSt I
of a wash with a trisodium phosphate I
detergent with cold water, a rinse with
cold tap water, another wash with a tri-
sodium phosphate detergent and cold water,
a rinse in cold tap water, a rinse with
deionized water 2 a rinse with pesticide
rade iso 1 alcohol and then allow
the'alcohol to air dr from thee ui ment.
This variance is submitted because a source
of hot tap water at the decon area at Cedar
Springs Road plant is. no longer available. I
j,_ 27-cf:,
• .Page of
Southeast Region
KnoxYille1 !ennes9ee Variance No. 5
V A.Rl.ARCT LOG ·
Office / / l'ield /_!_j
?reject National Starch and Chemical Corporation RI/FS
?,eject No. _ _;4~0~8~9~2~4,_ ________ _
\'a:-iznce I
Date
2/26/87
In1:iatec!
Bv
Tom Smith I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Applicable'
Docu:::ent Desc~iu:ion of Variance
Project I In Se:tion 6.1 and 6.3 of the POP and in
Operations Appendix A, Section 3.3 of the QAPP, it is
Plan (Dec. stated that soil and sediment samples will
1986) be composited using a Teflon spoon. This
Section 6.1 variance is being submitted to substitute a
and 6.3 stainless steel spoon for a Teflon spoon.
Quality All compositing of soil and sediment will be
Assurance as described in the Project Operations, Plan
Project with the exception that a stainless steel
Plan spoon will be used to mix the soil and sedi-
(Aug. 29, ment sample.
1986)
Appendix A
Section 131
I
I
I
,)
I Ai:-.:,,oved
PX/Date IOAO/Date
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
.. , • lifli:!_tional Starch and Chemical Corporation
Lumber Street •
P.O. Box 399
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
704-633-1731
Ms. Giezelle S. Bennett
Enforcement Project Manager
U. S. Environmental Protection
Region VI
345 Courtland Street
A tiama, Georgia 30365
Agency
Re: National Starch and Chemical Corporation
Salisbury, North Carolina
Cedar· Springs Road Rl/FS
Dear Ms; Bennett:
In accordance with the
attached is the monthly
January, 1987.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
. . i
!' ki
Manager, North Carolina Locations
REP/js
Enclosure
cc: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Enclosure
A.
H.
R.
Sampson, National Starch & C_hemical Corp., Bridgewater,
Graulich, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater,
Alewine, IT Corporation, Kno:>0.ille, Tenn.
N.J.
N.J.
•
. ·•
,/ '1
'' ,, ., . ., ..
.,_ ·,:; "~
·. -~::.f-?
'. -':·:,,,,
·t •vi~eengineers are available to help purchasers obtain best results from our rroducts, and recommendations are based on tests and information believed to be 1e!ia:)1e; .', ~, ·
·. we have nu control over the conditions under which our products are tr.in~purtcd to, stored, handled, or used by purchasers. All recommendations and s,h~'> are ,.: .. j
•:ondition chat we will not be held liable for any d,im.iges rcsul1ing-from their use. No repre~t!ntativc of ours has any authority to waive or changt! this pro·lislc.n." /.<,; ;~'.~...:-"
. ·t' <!):; :!
·': '
• •
Monthly Progress Report -January 1987
National Starch & Chemical Corporation RI/FS
Cedar Springs Road
Salisbury, North Carolina
1. Action taken achieving compliance with Consent Order
0 Work Plan, Health & Safety Plan, Projects Operations Plan, and Quality
Assurance Project Plan approved by EPA on January 26, 1987.
0 Geophysical survey completed and report prepared ( to be forwarded
to EPA by mid-February) ·
2. Sampling results· and oth~r test data
0 No sampling conducted in January 1987
3. Plans and procedures completed and plans scheduled for next month
0
0
0
Begin field investigative work on February 23, 1987 including
Health & Safety training
Site mobilization and set up
Begin construction of ground water monitoring wells and bore
holes
Surface water and sediment samp.ling scheduled for the week of March 23,
1987
Ground water sampling scheduled to begin the week of April 20, 1987
and July 13, 1987.
• . .'
. ' ' /li:!_tional Starch and Chemical Corporation • ~-
Lumber Street
P.O. Box 399
Salisbury, North Carolina 28144
704-633-1731
Ms. Giezelle S. Bennett
Enforcement Project Manager
U. s. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Re: National Starch and Chemical Corporation
Salisbury, North Carolina
Cedar Springs Road RI/FS
Dear Ms. Bennett:
May B,1987
In accordance with the Administrative Order on Consent for the referenced site, attached is the monthly progress report for the RI/FS activities for the month of April, 1987.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.
REP/js
Enclosure
Sincerely,
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION
~Jl.&Zi~
Ray E. Paradowski
Manager, North Carolina Locations
cc: Mr. A. Samson, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, NJ
Mr. H. Graulich, National Starch & Chemical Corp., Bridgewater, NJ Mr. R. Alewine, IT Corporation, Knoxville, Tenn.
Enclosure
"Our servke engineers are available to help purchasers obtain best results from our products, and recommendations are based on tests and information believed to be reliable. However, we have nu control over the conditions under which our products are transported to, stored, handled, or used by purchasers. All recommendations and sales are made on condition that we will not be held liable for any damages resulting from their use. No representative of ours has any authority to waive or change this provision."
• • •
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT -APRIL 1987
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION RI/FS
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
1, Actions Taken to Achieve Compliance with the Consent Order
0
0
0
0
0
Developed ground water monitoring wells including 14 shallow and 3
deep monitoring wells.
Completed aquifer response and slug tests of selected shallow wells
and selected shallow and deep well clusters.
Sampled 16 ground water monitoring wells. In constructing monitoring
well NS-01, a zone of saturation was encountered at approximately 30
feet. Drilling continued for an additional 10 feet and the
monitoring well was installed. The well did not recover after
development, and it can only be concluded that we encountered a
perched water table. Due to the close proximity of the perched zone
to the surficial aquifer, it was difficult to differentiate the two
water bearing zones in the field.
Constructed test pits on Thursday, April 30, 1987 to clarify
geophysical anomalies detected in geophysical survey,
Received and forwarded three EPA Quality Control samples to IT
Analytical Services for analysis. Samples included the following:
Sample No. ~ Analysis Requested
NS 18 Water Full HSL
(blank) Volatiles, base neutral and acid
extractables, pesticides and PCBs,
metals and cyanide
NS 19 Water Full HSL (same as NS 18)
(spike)
NS 20 Water Metals
(ICS)
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPO& APRIL 1987
NATIONAL STARCH AND cm:rcAL CORPORATION
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD • 2
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
2. Sampling and Other Test Data
Please find attached the following:
0
0
0
0
0
QC sample on deionized water from National Starch and Chemical
Corporation, Cedar Springs Road plant
QC sample on pesticide grade isopropanol
Analysis on BH-NS16 (20') soil
BH-NS07 (20') soil
BH-03 Composite ( 3-15' ). soil
BH-05 Composite (3-15') soil
Analysis on travel blanks and CLP QA/QC samples
Expect remaining soil and surface water/sediment analyses by
May 10, 1987
3. Variances to the Work Plan and Additional Details on Field Investigative
Activities
0
0
Variance 10 to be submitted by mid-May 1987 documenting slight
modification in manner in which ground water samples were collected.
Variance discussed and approved by Brian Klenk during first round of
ground water sampling in April.
Sample NS20 ( EPA QC sample)
acidified sample. Therefore,
metals are in solution.
again requested dissolved metals on
total metals will be run since all
4. Activities Planned for May 1987
0
0
0
0
0
No field activities planned for May or June 1987
Second round of ground water samples to be collected week of
July 13, 1987
Incoming analytical data will be sorted and tabulated for evaluation
and review
Geochemical testing of soil alternative capacity proceeding as
scheduled
Risk assessment (hazard evaluation) to begin in May
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Cl ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECTCODE ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE 11 OF 23
Sample Number: BH05 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-1, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil) received March 4, 1987 Concentration units are µg/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
QA/QC -Matrix Spike Recovery Data
Analyzed
Amount Spike Theoretical Cone. of
Analyzed Amount Concentration. Sample +
in Sample + Added = Sample + Spike Spike
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 330 U 2,400 2,400 1,600 acenaphthene 330 U 2,400 2,400 1,800
2,4-dinitrotoluene 330 U 2,400 2,400 1,300
pyrene 72 J 2,400 2,500 2,100
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine 330 U 2,400 2,400 900
1,4-dichlorobenzene 330 U 2,400 2,400 1,600
pentachlorophenol 1,600 U 4,700 4,700 3,900
phenol 330 U 4,700 4,700 3,200
2-chl orophenol 330 U 4,700 4,700 3,400
4-chloro-3-methylphenol 330 U 4,700 4,700 3,500
4-nitrophenol 1,600 U 4,700 4,700 3,300
%
Recovery
67
75
54
84
38
67
83
68
72
74
70
U -Compound was
sample.
J -Indicates an
analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
estimated value less than the detection limit.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/4/87
3/11/87
Title
&& rlll. Accredited by the Amencan Asso::1at1on !or Labo_rotory Accreditat1on in the chemical .....-~ held 01 testmg. as listed m the current AAf..A Directory al Accredi!ed Laboralones
93-9•B5
rn INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OFANAL YSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE: ITEK 23915
ORDERNUMBER: 408924.13.71
PAGE 12 OF 23
Sample Number: BH05 {3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
Concentration units are µg/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
QA/QC -Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Data
Analyzed
Amount Spike Theoretical Cone. of
Ana 1 yzed Amount Con cent ration Sample +
in Sample + Added = Sample+ Spike Spike
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 330 U 2,400 2,400 1,500
acenaphthene 330 U 2,400 2,400 1,700
2,4-dinitrotoluene 330 U 2,400 2,400 1,200
pyrene 72 J 2,400 2,500 1,800
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine 330 U 2,400 2,400 780 1,4-dichlorobenzene 330 U 2,400 2,400 1,500
pentachlorophenol 1,600 U 4,700 4,700 3,700
pheno 1 330 U 4,700 4,700 3,000
2-chl orophenol 330 U 4,700 4,700 3,100
4-chloro-3-methylphenol 330 U 4,700 4,700 3,200
4-n it ropheno 1 1,600 U 4,700 4,700 3,000
%
Recovery
63
71
50
72
33
63
79
64
66
68
64
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
Date Extracted: 3/4/87
Date Analyzed: 3/11/87
Approved by
Laboratory Manager
Tltle
aa na_ Accred11ect by the Amencan Asso.:iahon !or Laboratory Accred1tat1on m the chemical
..,.....,-~ llelct ol testing. as ltsted m the current AAl.A Directory al Accred1ted Labora1ones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924 .13. 71
PAGE_~l._,3LOF 23
Sample Number: BH05 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-1, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil) received March 4, 1987
Concentration units are µg/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
QA/QC -Matrix Spike Recovery Data
Analyzed
Amount Spike Theoretical Cone. of
Analyzed Amount Concentration Sample +
in Sample + Added = Sample+ Spike Spike
lindane 11 U 38 38 38 heptachlor 11 U 38 38 38
aldrin 11 U 38 38 39 dieldrin 22 U 94 94 96 endrin 22 U 94 94 102 4,4'-DDT 22 U 94 94 87
%
Recovery
100
100
103
102
109
93
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
Date Extracted: 3/ 4/87
Date Analyzed: 3/11/87, 3/16/87
. ~a_/?. '7//~
Approved b Laboratory Manager
Tille
aa na. Accred1!ed by the Amencan .A.sso.:1at1on !Or Labora1ory Accred1!at1on in the chem1cal ..,...,~ tield o! testing. as !isled in the current AAl.A Directory 01 Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
@ INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL·
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615·588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECTCODE ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE_~l~4~oF 23
Sample Number: BH05 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil) received March 4, 1987 Concentration units are µg/kg (ppb) on a dry weight basis
QA/QC -Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Data
Analyzed
Amount Spike Theoretical Cone. of Analyzed Amount Concentration Sample + in Sample + Added = Sample+ Spike Spike
lindane 11 U 38 38 43 heptachlor 11 U 38 38 35 al d ri n 11 U 38 38 35 dieldrin 22 U 94 94 87 endrin 22 U 94 94 93 4,4'-DDT 22 U 94 94 106
~-,,-'-,,..., --:: : -~;__-; ~
,, "'-:, --_. . -·-:\tfif-
%
Recovery
113
92
92
93
99
113
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
Date Extracted: 3/4/87
Date Analyzed: 3/11/87, 3/16/87
Approv;;;; · Laboratory Manager
Title
aa na_ Accrechted by the Amencan Asso.::1at1on Jar Laboratory AccedJtat1on 1n the chemical .......,~ held cl testing. as listed in the current AAl.A Directory 01 Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924 .13. 71
PAGE __ l....,SmAOF 23
METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
~.:;.--=-,:_,
--~~::~-~~-{,ii~t
Sample No.
Method Blank 1
Date of
Analysis Fraction Compound
cyclotrisiloxane,
hexamethyl
Concentration
( µg/1 iter)
3-11-87 VOA
Method Blank 1 3-4-87 BNA
J -Indicates an estimated value.
*Suspected aldol condensate.
benzoic acid
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
di-N-butylphthalate
unknown
1,3,5-cycloheptatriene
unknown
acetic acid,1
methyl ethyl ester
2-pentanone,4-hydroxy-
4-methyl *
heptane,2,3-dimethyl
unknown (saturated
hydrocarbon)
unknown (hydrocarbon)
2-butanone,4-chloro-
4,4-difluoro
2-hexanone,6-(acetyloxy)-
2(5H)-furanone,5,5-
d imethyl -
Title
unknown
2,5-cyclohexadiene-
1,4-dione,2,3-dimethyl-
unknown
unknown
hexadecanoic acid
aa ra Accredited by the Amencan A.sso~1alion !or Labo_ra1ary Accred.!totion in the chemical ~~ held o! testing. as listed m the current A.Al.A Directory cl Accred1ted Laboratones
9 J
250 J
150 J
54 J
230 J
570 J
170 J
3,000 J
20,000 J
1,700 J
2,600 J
140 J
260 J
720 J
530 J
1,300 J
1,300 J
1,300 J
1,300 J
420 J
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
Sample No.
Method Blank 1
Method Blank 1
Method Blank 1
Date of
Analysis
3-4-87
3-11-87
3-16-87
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924 .13. 71
PAGE 15B OF 23
METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Fraction
BNA
PEST
PEST
Compound
Con cent ration
(µg/1 iter)
2-propenoic acid,2-
methyl-,oxybis(2,l-
ethane dyloxy-2,1-
ethandy) !
unknown
6,10,14-hexadecatrien-
l-ol ,3,7,ll,15-
tetramethyl
unknown
none
none
140 J
1,300 J
530 J
1,300 J
J -Indicates an estimated value.
Laboratory Manager
Tille
aa n.11. Accred1ted by the Amencan Asso.:iahon tor Laboratory Acc:ed..ita110n in !he chem1cal ......,~ held or testing. as hsted m the current AAfJ.. Directory 01 Accredited Laboratones
93.9.95
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
Sample
No.
BH03
BH05
BH03
Method Blank
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED: April 6, 1987
PROJECTCODE ITEK 23915 ORDERNUMBER: 408924.13.71
PAGE_~l~6~A OF 23
SOIL SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARY
VOLATILE
Toluene-DB BFB 1,2 Dichloroethane-D4
(81-117 )* (74-121)* (70-121)*
98 101 133**
97 103 92
102 114 109
98 104 91
*Values in parenthesis represent USEPA contract required QC limits. **Values are outside of contract required QC limits.
Title
&& n.11.. Accredited by the Amencan Asso::1at1on for Lobo_rotory Acc:-ectitouon m the chem1cal .......-~ !1eld o! testing, as listed m the current AAf..A D1redory cl Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
[D INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED: April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23 915
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE 16C OF 23
SOIL SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARY
Sample
No.
BH03
BH05
Method Blank
BH05 MS
BH05 MSD
PESTICIDE
Dibutylchlorendate
(20-150)*
92
89
91
95
87
*Values in parenthesis represent USEPA advisory QC limits.
Title
a& fla Accredited by the Amencan Asso::1ation !or Labo_ratory Accred1!alion in the chemical
,.,.....,~ held at testmg, as hsted m the current AA1.A D1rectory ct Accredited Laboratones
93-9•85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation DATE REPORTED Apri 1 6, 1987
PROJECTCODE ITEK 23915 ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
Nitro-
ORDER NUMBER 408924 .13. 71
PAGE __ l..,_6,,,B OF 23
SOIL SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARY
SEMI-VOLATILE
2-Fluoro-Terphenyl -2-Fluoro-Sample Benzene-OS Bi phenyl 014 Phenol-05 Phenol
(18-137)* (24-113)* (26-121 )* No. (23-120 )* (30-116 )*
Method Blank 65 66 78 68 69
BH03 69 68 96 72 74 BH05 66 69 88 69 72 BH05 75 77 90 76 78 BH05 71 74 78 74 78
*Values in parenthesis represent USEPA contract required QC limits.
Approv y Laboratory Manager
Tille
-.-fla Accredited by the Arnencan Asso-:1ahon tor Labo_ratory Accred1tat1o_n m the chem1cal ,.,...,-~ held o! teshng, as hsted m the curren! AAl.A Directory a! Accredited Laboratones
.. ~ :!~;:~>--~~~~'
2 ,4 ,6
Tribromo-
Pheno 1
(18-122)*
57
59
61
67
65
93-9-85
[D INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED: Apri 1 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE: ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924 .13. 71
PAGE_~le.1.7_0f 23
~~-.: /f±.\:~•--~;j;i
Sample Description: BH03 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1130 (Soil) received March 4, 1987
INORGANIC ANALYSIS -HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST METALS
Concentration
(µg/gram dry weight)
Concentration
(µg/gram dry weight)
aluminum
antimony
arsenic**
barium
beryllium
cadmium
calcium
chromium
cob a 1t
copper
iron
lead
20,600
<0.6*
22
134
0.68
<0.3
560
15
34
107
49,800
6.2
magnesium
manganese
mercury
nickel
potassium
selenium
s i l ve r
sodium
thallium
vanadium
zinc
1,680
1,390
0.03
4.3
137
<O. 3
<0.03
932
<0.8*
134
47
*Detection limit higher than normal due to sample matrix interferences. **Severe matrix interferences -results for arsenic for this sample should be viewed as qualitative only.
Date Analyzed: 3/13-31/87, 3/23/87 (Mercury)
'Approvby Laboratory Manager
Tille
aa 1111. Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:1al!On !or Laboratory Accreditat1on m the chem1col ..,...,~ held ct testing. as llSted in the current AALA Directory o! Accrechted Laboratones
93-9-65
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO. IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Di rectors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED Apri 1 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE: ITEK 23915
ORDERNUMBER 408924.13.71
PAGE--.11.;:8-OF 23
Sample Description: BH05 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-1, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil) received March 4, 1987
INORGANIC ANALYSIS -HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST METALS
Concentration Concentration
(µg/gram dry weight) (µg/gram dry weight)
aluminum 24,800 magnesium
antimony <0.6* manganese
arsenic 13 mercury
barium 85 nickel
beryllium 1.1 potassium
cadmium <0.3 selenium
calcium 886 silver
chromium 39 sodium
cobalt 51 thallium
copper 78 vanadium
i ran 52,000 zinc
lead 7.0
*Detection limit higher than normal due to sample matrix interferences.
Date Analyzed: 3/13-31/87, 3/23/87 (Mercury)
I
Approved. Laboratory Manager
Tille
---nlll. Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:1a!Jon !or Laboratory Accredilat1on m the chem1cal ..,,..,~ held ol testmg. as listed m the current AAf..A Directory al Accredl!ed Laboratones
706
1,470
0.04
5.4
120.
<O. 3
<0.03
427
<O. 3
189
35
93-9-85
---...:;,-.<-=-.:-~ (D INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES • -,~_!!~~\~-~
-~~{ 5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED.
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
April 6, 1987
ITEK 23915
408924.13.71
19 OF 23
Sample Description: BH03 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1130 (Soil) received March 4, 1987
Concentration units are µg/gram (ppm) on a dry weight basis
QA/QC -Duplicate Analysis Data
aluminum
antimony
arsenic
barium
beryllium
cadmium
calcium
chromium
cobalt
copper
iron
lead
magnesium
manganese
mercury
nickel
potassium
selenium
silver
sodium
thallium
vanadium
zinc
Control Limit
+ 20%
+ 20% + 56 µg/g
+ 20% + 14 µg/g + 20% + 20% + 1.4 µg/g + 1,400 µg/g + 20%
+ 20% + 20%
*Out of Control Limits
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
Original
Sample
Concentration
20,600
<0.6
22
134
0.68
<0.3
560.
15
34
107
49,800
6.2
1,680
1,390
0.03
4.3
137
<0.3
<0.03
932
<0.8
134
47
Duplicate
Con cent ration
20,400
<0.6
20.
129
0.66
<0.3
1,100
18
41
103
52,000
8.9
1,620
1,570
<0.03
5.5
304
<0.2
<0.02
863
<0.6
147
45
RPD
10%
NC
10%
5 µg/g
NC
NC
NC
18%
7 µg/g
4%
4%
2. 7* µg/g
60. µg/g
12%
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
9%
4%
NC= Non-calculable RPD due to value(s) less than ~ct ~~= Limits.
Approved y
Laboratory Manager
Tille
aa ra Accredited by the Amencan Asso::::1alion !or Laboratory Acc:-editcrt1on m the chem1ca! ._...,~ held at testing. as. liSted in the current AAl..A D1rectory al Accredt!ed Laboratones
93-9-85
[I] INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation DATEREPORTED: April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23915 ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
ORDER NUMBER 408924, 13. 71
PAGE __ ...,20.,__ OF 23
Sample Description: BH03 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-1, 3/2/87, 1130 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
Concentration units are ~g/gram (ppm) on a dry weight basis
QA/QC -Matrix Spike Recovery Data
anti many
arsenic
barium
beryllium
cadmium
chromium
cobalt
copper
lead
manganese
mercury
nickel
selenium
silver
thallium
vanadium
zinc
Spiked
Sample Result
38
11
558
13
12
66
70.
149
23
1,090
0.18
128
0.44
2.4
13
251
166
Sample
Result
<0.6
22
134
0.68
<0.3
15
34
107
6.2
1,390
0.03
4.3
<0.3
<0.03
<0.8
134
47
N = Out of Control Limits (i.e., 75-125% Recovery)
NR = Not required
Spike
Added
134
21
535
13
13
53
134
67
13
NR
0.14
134
2.7
2.7
13
134
134
% Recovery
28 N
N
79
95
92
96
27 N
63 N
129 N
NR
107
92
16 N
89
100
87
89
Comments: Manganese: Sample concentration is greater than four times spiking
concentration.
Arsenic: Severe matrix interferences -results for arsenic should be viewed
as qualitative only.
---na Accredited by the Amencan A..sso::1allon tor Laboratory Accred.Jlahon in the chemical
,.,.....~ held o! testing. as listed in the current AAf..A Directory oJ Accredited Labora!ones
93-9-65
[I] INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
0 ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23915
ORDERNUMBER 408924.13.71
PAGE_~2~l~oF 23
Sample Description: Two (2) soil samples received March 4, 1987
~-?-=-.::_..
-_:_~~~
:(~~;\!.-
Concentration units are µg/gram (ppm) on a dry weight basis, unless otherwise stated
Cyanide Phenols
BH03 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-1, 3/2/87, 1130 <0.5 <0.7
BH05 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1500 <0.5 <0.7
Method Blank <0.01 mg/L <0.01 mg/l
Date of Analysis 3/9/87 3/9/87
Approved Laboratory.Manager
Title
aa ra Accredited by the Amencan Asso;;1ahon !or Laboratory Accredita!Jon m the chemical
......,~ held 01 testing. as !ISied m the current AAl.A D1rec1ory 01 Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Di rectors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECTCODE ITEK 23915
ORDERNUMBER 408924.13.71
PAGE __ ,...,?2_ OF 23
Sample Description: BH03 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-1, 3/2/87, 1130 (Soil)
Concentration units are µg/gram (ppm) on a dry weight basis
QA/QC -Duplicate Analysis Data
~---~-----~ ~~-'-:'_ ,,~ ........ ~-;,\ ~
-~:~;;!
Parameter
Cyanide
Phenols
Original Sample
Con cent ration
<O. 5
<0.5
Duplicate
Concentration
<O. 5
<0.5
RPD (%)
NC
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
NC= Not calculable
Approv y Laboratory Manager
aa na_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:iation !or Labo_ratory Ac:::ed.J.ta11on in the chemical
...,...,~ held 01 testmg. as ltsted m the current AAf.A D1rectory ol Accredited Laboratones
NC
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES • 5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
April 6, 1987
ITEK 23915
408924.13.71
23 OF 23
Sample Number: BH05 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-1, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil)
Concentration units are µg/gram (ppm) on a dry weight basis
Cyanide
Phenols
QA/QC -Spike Recovery Data
Analyzed
Amount Spike Theoretical Cone. of
Analyzed Amount Con cent ration Sample +
in Sample + Added = Sample + Spike Spike
<0.5 7.1 7.1 6.5
<0.7 7.1 7.1 7.1
· Approvd Laboratory Manager
Title
aa. ra_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso:tahon !or Laboratory Accred1tat1on m the chemical .,....,~ 11eld 01 testmg, as listed in the current AN.A Directory o! Accredited Laborotones
%
Recovery
91
100
93-9-BS
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation DATE REPORTED April 2, 1987 ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
PROJECT CODE: ITEK 23887-Corrected Cert if i catE
ORDER NUMBER 408924 .13. 71
PAGE 1 0 F ...,l,___
Sample Description: Three (3) deionized water samples received February 27, 1987
Concentration units are mg/liter (ppm) unless otherwise stated
Method Sample #5 Date of
Blank 2-25-87 Analysis
pH (standard units) NA 6.22 3/2/87 Specific Conductance (~mhos/cm) NA 0.8 3/3/87 Chloride 0.3 0.5 3/4/87 Total Dissolved Solids <l 4 3/3/87,
4/1/87 (reanalysis) Total Suspended Solids <l <l 3/3/87
Phenols
Cyanide
Method
Blank
<0.01
Method
Blank
<0.01
Tille
Sample #3
2-25-87
0.02
Sample #2
2-25-87
<0.01
Date of
·. Analysis
3/6/87
Date of
Analysis
3/3/87
Laboratory Manager
&& na_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:iallon tor Labo_rcrtory Accred1tallon in the chemical ..,,..,~ tield or testing. as l1Sted m the current AAf.A Directory al Accred1ted. Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
0 ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED: April 2, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE~~-OF ~l __
Sample Description: Sample #4, 2/25/87 (Deionized Water)
INORGANIC ANALYSIS -HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST METALS
Con cent ration Concentration ( µg/1 iter)
aluminum 88 magnesium antimony <2 manganese arsenic <l mercury barium <20 n i eke l beryllium <2 potassium cadmium <l selenium calcium 130. silver chromium 16 sodium cobalt <5 thallium copper <2 vanadium iron 291 zinc lead 6.4
Date of Analysis: 3/13/87 -4/1/87, 3/23/87 (Hg)
Approved Laboratory Manager
Title
A& na_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso:1alion !or Laboratory Accred1ta11on in the chemical ......,~ held ol testing. as listed in the current AALA D1rec1ory at Accredited Laboratones
( µg/1 iter)
<20
6.9
<0.02
<10
<20
<l
<0.1
25
<l
<20
13
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
Apri 1 15, 1987
ITEK 23985
408924.13. 71
12 OF 17
SOIL SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARY
VOLATILE
Sample Toluene-DB BFB 1,2 Dichloroethane-D4
No. (81-117)* (74-121)* (70-121)*
BH-NS16 109 111 74
BH-NS07 108 111 71
Method Blank 1 101 104 118
*Values in parenthesis represent USEPA contract required QC limits.
Sworn to and subsccbec(l,elorr,ro.e,thIS 15th
dayol Aprl I' ';j/j/
January 16 1988
Approved I( Laboratory Manager
Tit!e
aa nil. Accredited by the Amencan Asso:1ahon /or Laboratory Accredtlation in the chemical
.,..,~ held o! 1estmg. as hs1ed m the current AM.A. Directory ol Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
April 15, 1987
ITEK 23985
408924.13.71
13 OF 17
SOIL SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARY
SEMI-VOLATILE
Nitro-2-Fluoro-Terphenyl -2-Fluoro-
Sample Benzene-OS Biphenyl D14 Phenol-OS Phenol
No. (23-120)* ( 30-116) * (18-137)* (24-113)* (26-121)*
Method Blank 1 66 67 61 66 54
BH-NS16 79 79 68 86 73
BH-NS07 82 81 68 89 72
*Values in parenthesis represent USEPA contract required QC limits.
16, 1988
Approved,,{( Laboratory Manager
Title
---fla Accredi!e<:1 by the Amencan Asso.::1ation lor Labo_ratory Accred.Itation m the chemical
......,~ 11eld of teslmg. as listed m the current AAlJ.. Directory ol Accredited Laboratones
2,4,6
Tri bromo-
Phenol
(18-122)*
49
78
75
•
93-9-65
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED: Apri 1 15, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23985
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE 14 OF 17
SOIL SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARY
Sample
No.
BH-NS07
BH-NS16
Method Blank 1
PESTICIDE
Dibutylchlorendate
(20-150)*
89
91
76
*Values in parenthesis represent USEPA advisory QC limits.
15th Sworn to and subsc[lbecl beT lo~,.[Pt_e, this, _____ r
dayol Aprl , l~tl/
January
Laboratory Manager
Tille
aa na_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso;::1otion !or Laboratory Accreditation m the chem1cal
.,....,~ held oJ testing. as listed in the current A.Al.A Directory oJ Accredited Laboratones
93-9-3S
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
April 15, 1987
ITEK 23985
408924.13.71
15 OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS16-20 Ft-1, 3/14/87, 1535 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
INORGANIC ANALYSIS -HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST METALS
Concentration
(ug/gram dry weight)
Concentration
(µg/gram dry weight)
aluminum
antimony
arsenic
barium
beryllium
cadmium
calcium
chromium
cobalt
copper
i ran
lead
18,600
<0.6*
9.3
121
<0. 6*
<0.3
4,710
17
16
80.
37,000
4.8
magnesium
manganese
mercury
nickel
potassium
selenium
silver
sodium
thallium
vanadium
zinc
*Detection limit higher than normal due to sample matrix interferences.
Date Analyzed: 3/23-4/8/87, 3/23/87 {Mercury)
Sworn to and subsqibeq );,elo!J',rne, this __ l_S_t h __
dayol Aprl I, l,iti/
January 1988
Title
aa fla. Accredited by ~he P.mencan A.sso::iation !or Laboratory Accred1tat1on m the chem1cal
......,-~ !1eld ot testmg. as ltsted m the current A.AfA Direciory ol A.ccredited Laboratones
1,720
1,490
<0.05
8.6
102
<0.3
<0.03
1,240
<0.3
131
46
93·9-85
(I] INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
April 15, 1987
ITEK 23985
408924.13. 71
16 OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS07-20 Ft-1, 3/15/87, 1600 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
INORGANIC ANALYSIS -HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST METALS
Concentration Concentration
(µg/gram dry weight) (µg/gram dry weight)
aluminum 20,900 magnesium
antimony <0.6* manganese
arsenic 8 .1 mercury
barium 162 nickel
beryllium 0.98 potassium
cadmium <0.3 selenium
calcium 4,730 silver
chromium 22 sodium
cobalt 22 thallium
copper 93 vanadium
i ran 42,000 zinc
lead 6.7
*Detection limit higher than normal due to sample matrix interferences,
Date Analyzed: ~/23-4/8/87, 3/23/87 (Mercury)
Sworn to and subscDbec\ t,etorr.ro-e.this __ 1_5_t_h __
ctayot Apr1 I' ':j/J/
My omm1ss1on expires · J a OU a ry <
16, 1988
Approve y Laboratory Manager
Title
aa na Accredited by the Amencan Asso:=iat1on !or Labo_ratory Accred.1ta11on tn 1he chemical .......,'lJ!!' held o! testing. as hsted m the current AALA Directory ot Accred1ted Laboratones
2,180
3,040
0.04
15
223
<0.3
<0.03
1,480
<0.3
185
55
93-9-65
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED: April 15, 1987
PROJECT CODE: ITEK 23985
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE 17 OF 17
Sample Description: Two (2) soil samples received March 19, 1987
Concentration units are µg/gram (ppm) on a dry weight basis
BH-NS16-20 Ft-1, 3/14/87, 1535
BH-NS07-20 Ft-1, 3/15/87, 1600
Dates of Analysis
15, 1988
Cyanide
<0.5
<0.5
3/24/87
Phenols
<1.5
<1.5
3/27/87
Approved b Laboratory Manager
Title
aa na Accredited by the Amencan As.so.:1ahon !or Labo_ratory Accredllalion m the chemical
.,.,..,~ held o! testing. as lJSled m the current AA1..A Directory al .Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
m INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES • · -CORPORATION
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401'
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 2388 7
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE 1 OF 16
Sample Description: Sample #1, 2/25/87, (Deionized Water)
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Concentration
Compound ( µg/1 iter) Compound
bis(2-chloroethyl )ether 10. u 2,6-dinitrotoluene
1,3-dichlorobenzene 10. u diethylphthalate
1,4-dichlorobenzene 10. u 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether benzyl alcohol 15 fl uorene
1,2-dichlorobenzene 10. u 4-nitroaniline
bis(2-chloroisopropyl )ether 10. u N-nitrosodiphenylamine 1
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine 10. u 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether hexachloroethane 10. u hexachlorobenzene
nitrobenzene 10. u phenanthrene isophorone 10. u anthracene
bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 10. u di-n-butylphthalate
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 10. u fluoranthene
n.apht ha l ene 10. u pyrene
4-chloroaniline 10. u butylbenzylphthalate
hexachlorobutadiene 10. u 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine 2-methylnaphthalene 10. u benzo(a)anthracene hexachlorocyclopentadiene 10. u bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2-chloronaphthalene 10. u chrysene 2-nitroanil ine 50. u di-n-octyl phthalate dimethyl phtha late 10. u benzo(b)fluoranthene acenaphthylene 10. u benzo(k)fluoranthene
3-nitroaniline 50. u benzo(a)pyrene
acenaphthene 10. u indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene dibenzofuran 10. u dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2,4-dinitrotoluene 10. u benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Concentration
( µg/l iter)
10. u
10. u
10. u
10. u
50. u
4 JB
10. u
10. U
10. u
10. u
4 J
10. u
10. u
10. u
20. u
10. U
10. u
10. u
10. u
10. u
10. u
10. u
1 o. u
10. U
10. u
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
1 -Detected as diphenylamine.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/2/87
3/4/87
Approved J/
Laboratory Manager
Title
--fla Accredited by the Amencan Asso::1al!on tor Laboratory Accred.1lation m the chemical
...,....,~ 11eld o! testing. as llSted m the current AALA Directory ol Accredited Laboratones
93-9-65
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE 2 OF 16
Sample Description: Sample #1, 2/25/87, (Deionized Water)
ACID EXTRACTABLE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Con cent ration Con cent ration
Compound ( µg/1 iter) Compound (µg/1 iter)
phenol 290 4-chloro-3-methylphenol 10. u
2-chlorophenol 10. u 2,4,6-trichlorophenol 10. u
2-methyl phenol 10. u 2,4,5-trichlorophenol 50. u
4-methylphenol 10. u 2,4-dinitrophenol 10. u
2-nitrophenol 10. u 4-n i tropheno 1 50. u
2,4-dimethylphenol 10. u 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol 4 JB
benzoic acid 19 J pentachlorophenol 8 JB
2,4-dichlorophenol 10. u
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/2/87
3/4/87
Approved Laboratory Manager
Title
aa na_ Accred1ted by the Amencan Asso:1atlon !or Laborcrlory /1.ccreditahon m the chemical
...,....,-~ held o! testing. as l1Sted m the current AAl.A Directory ol Accred.1ted Laboralones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES • -~1~f·~,-.
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401 \[~:)
CERTIFICATE OFANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE_~3~ OF 16
Sample Description: Sample #1, 2/25/87, (Deionized Water)
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Con cent ration Tentative Identification ( 1 ) Fraction (µg/1 iter)
unknown BNA 23 cyclahexanone (ACN) BNA 1,200 1-heptanol BNA 17 1-heptanol,6-methyl-BNA 10. l-decene,2,4-dimethyl-BNA 900 unknown BNA 27 cyclopropane,1-heptyl-2-methyl-BNA 31 hexanoic acid,2-ethyl-BNA 79 nonanol BNA 13 unknown BNA 46 oxirane,[[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]methyl]-BNA 80. 1-octanol ,dimethyl-BNA 27 decane,3-chloro-BNA 27 phenol ,3-(1-methylethyl)-BNA 10. 2-propanol, 1-[2-(2-methoxy-1-methyl ethoxy)-
1-methylethoxy]-BNA 20. decanoi c acid BNA 12 dodecanoic acid BNA 19 phosphoric acid tributyl ester BNA 8 tetradecanoic acid BNA 8 unknown BNA 290 unknown BNA 11 2-propenoic acid,2-methyl-,1,2-ethanediylbis
(oxy-2,1-ethanediyl)ES! BNA 32 2-propenoic acid,2-methyl-,1,2-ethanediylbis
(oxy-2,1-ethanediyl)ES! BNA 920 phenol ,2-[1-(4-hydroxyphenyl )-1-methyl ethyl]-BNA 280
Remarks: ( 1 )
( 2)
Identification is based on computer search of N.B.S. Library. Concentration is based on a response factor of 1.00 relative to the internal standard.
Date
Date
B Analyte was found in the blank as we~ll s the sample. Extracted: 3/2/87 / ' · /? ~-Analyzed: 3/4/87 A ed .,,,.< ~ /'/'?LcCu'-<'. pprov Laboratory Manager
Title
a& flll. Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:;ialion !or Laboratory Accred1tauon in the chem1cal .....,~ held o! testmg. as l1Sted m the current AAf.A. Directory 01 Accredited Labaratones
(2)
93-9-85
@ INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6<l01
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
Sample Description: Sample #1, 2/25/87, (Deionized Water)
March 30, 1987
ITEK 23887
408924.13. 71
4 OF 16
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST -PESTICIDE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Concentration Concentration
Compound (µg/liter) Compound (µg/liter)
a-BHC 0.05 U endosu l fan sulfate 0.10 U a-BHC 0.05 U 4,4'-DDT 0.10 U o-BHC o. 08 U methoxychlor 0.50 U y-BHC (l indane) 0.05 U endri n ketone 0.10 U heptachl or 0.05 U chlordane 0.50 U aldrin 0.05 U toxaphene 1.0 u heptachlor epoxide 0.05 U Aroclor 1016 0.50 U endosulfan I 0. 05 U Aroclor 1221 1.8 u dieldrin 0.10 U Aroclor 1232 0.50 U 4,4'-DDE 0 .10 U Aroclor 1242 0.50 U endrin 0.10 U Aroclor 1248 0.50 U endosulfan I I 0.10 U Aroclor 1254 1.0 u 4,4'-DDD 0.10 U Aroclor 1260 1.0 u
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit. B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted: 3/2/87
Date Analyzed: 3/11/87, 3/16/87
. ~, ~>a~/
Approved Laboratory Manager
Title
a&fl.11. Accredited by 1he lvnencan Asso::1at1on !or Laboratory Accreditatton m the chemical ,......,-~ 11eld ot lestmg. as listed m the current APJ.A Directory 01 Accredited Laboratones
93-9-BS
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
0 ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Kno:<ville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE: ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE_~5~·-OF 16
Sample Description: Sample #6, 2/25/87, (Deionized Water)
VOLATILE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
-:?'--:.;~,"'~·---......-:-:-;--..:--
. ,. 7". ~
Concentration Concentration
Compound (µg/1 iter) Compound (µg/liter)
chloromethane 10. u 1,2-dichloropropane 5 u
bromomethane 10. u trans-1,3-dichloropropene 5 u vinyl chloride 10. u trichloroethene 5 u chloroethane 10. u dibromochloromethane 5 u methylene chloride 5 u 1,1,2-trichloroethane 5 u acetone 71 benzene 5 u carbon disulfide 5 u cis-1,3-dichloropropene 5 u 1,1-dichloroethene 5 u 2-chloroethylvinylether 10. u 1,1-dichloroethane 5 u bromoform 5 u trans-1,2-dichloroethene 5 u 4-methyl-2-pentanone 10. u chloroform 7 J 2-hexanone 10. u 1,2-dichloroethane 5 u tetrachloroethene 5 u 2-butanone 10. u 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 5 u 1,1,1-trichloroethane 5 u toluene 1 J carbon tetrachloride 5 u chlorobenzene 5 u vinyl acetate 10. u ethyl benzene 5 u bromodichloromethane 5 u styrene 5 u
total xyl enes 5 u
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit. B -Anal yte was found in the blank as we 11 as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 2/27/87
• &..,.,, ~ ~ 4-4----te ./
Approvectt/ Laboratory Manager
Title
aa f1.II. Accredited by 1he Arnencon .A.s.so:1at1on tor Laboratory Accred.1!at1on in the chem1cal ..,..,~ l!eld o! testing. as listed in the current A.PJ.A Directory o! Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
0 ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
i
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-640i°
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
Sample Description: Sample #6, 2/25/87, (Deionized Water)
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
March 30, 1987
ITEK 23887
408924.13.71
6 OF 16
Tentative Identification (1)
4-penten-2-0L
1-pentanol,2-ethyl-4-methyl-
Fraction
Concentration (2)
(µg/liter)
VOA
VOA
24
28
Remarks: (1) Identification is based on computer search of N.B.S. Library.
(2) Concentration is based on a response factor of 1.00 relative to the i nterna 1 standard.
B Ana lyte was fol.ind in the b 1 ank as we 11 as the samp 1 e.
Date Analyzed: 2/27/87
Title
aa na. Accredited by the Amencan Asso::1ation !or Laboratory .A.ccreditallOn m the chemical .....,~ !leld of testing. as listed m the current AAl.A Directory al Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
· TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER: 408924.13. 71
PAGE_-1__OF 16
Sample Description: Sample #7, 2/25/87, (Deionized Water)
VOLATILE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
-~--~~
.-~: ::~,~ .-._
·,_{ ·····""··--,,\_ ._
\~~-{'
Concentration Concentration
Compound (µg/liter) Compound (µg/l iter)
chloromethane 10. u 1,2-dichloropropane 5 u bromomethane 10. u trans-1,3-dichloropropene 5 u vinyl chloride 10. u trichloroethene 5 u chloroethane 10. u dibromochloromethane 5 u methylene chloride 5 B 1,1,2-trichloroethane 5 u acetone 28 benzene 5 u carbon disulfide 5 u cis-1,3-dichloropropene 5 u 1,1-dichloroethene 5 u 2-chloroethylvinylether 10. u 1,1-dichloroethane 5 u bromoform 5 u trans-1,2-dichloroethene 5 u 4-methyl-2-pentanone 10. u chloroform 7 2-hexanone 10. u 1,2-dichloroethane 5 u tetrachloroethene 5 u 2-butanone 10. u 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 5 u 1,1,1-trichloroethane 5 u toluene 2 J carbon tetrachloride 5 u chlorobenzene 5 u vinyl acetate 10. u ethyl benzene 5 u bromodichloromethane 5 u styrene 5 u
total xyl enes 5 u
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit. B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 3/2/87
Tt!le
aa ra Accredited by !he Amencan Asso.:1ation !or Labo_rcrtory Accredlta11on in the chemical ..,.,..,~ held ot testmg, as listed m the current AA1.A Directory oJ Accrect,ted Laboratones
93"9-85
. [i] INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY · CORPORATION
0 ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE 8 OF 16
Sample Description: Sample #7, 2/25/87, (Deionized Water)
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Tentative Identification (1)
2-propano l
cyclotrisiloxane,hexamethyl
Fraction
VOA
VOA
Concentration (2)
(µg/l iter)
28
9
Remarks: (1) Identification is based on computer search of N.B.S. Library.
(2) Concentration is based on a response factor of 1.00 relative to the internal standard.
B Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 3/2/87
Tille
aa na Accrediled by 1he Amencan Asso::1ahon !Or Laboratory Accred.11a11on tn !he chem1cal ,.....~ tield of teslmg. as listed m the current Ml.A Directory ot Accredited Laboratanes
93-9-65
rn INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 3792 I • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
Sample Description: Sample #8, 2/25/87,
VOLATILE HAZARDOUS
DATE REPORTED March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER: 408924 .13. 71
PAGE 9 OF 16
(2-propanol)
SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Concentration Concentration
Compound (µg/liter) Compound (µg/liter)
chloromethane 1,000,000 U 1,2-dichloropropane 500,000 U
bromomethane 1,000,000 U trans-1,3-dichloropropene 500,000 U vinyl chloride 1,000,000 U trichloroethene 500,000 U
chloroethane 1,000,000 U dibromochloromethane 500,000 U
methylene chloride 150,000 BJ 1,1,2-trichloroethane 500,000 U
acetone 460,000 BJ benzene 500,000 U
carbon disulfide 500,000 U cis-1,3-dichloropropene 500,000 U
1,1-dichloroethene 500,000 U 2-chloroethylvinylether 1,000,000 U
1,1-dichloroethane 500,000 U bromoform 500,000 U
trans-1,2-dichloroethene 500,000 U 4-methyl-2-pentanone 1,000,000 U
chloroform 500,000 U 2-hexanone 1,000,000 U
1,2-dichloroethane 500,000 U tetrachloroethene 500,000 U
2-butanone 360,000 J 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 500,000 U
1,1,1-trichloroethane 500,000 U toluene 500,000 U
carbon tetrachloride 500,000 U chlorobenzene 500,000 U
vinyl acetate 1,000,000 U ethyl benzene 500,000 U
bromodichloromethane 500,000 U styrene 500,000 U
total xylenes 500,000 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 2/27/87
. &fk'.1 '£ 7A.~-te /
Approved b/ Laboratory Manager
Title
---na_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso~ialion !or Laboratory /1.ccred.Jtotion m the chemical
.,.,..,~ held ot testing. as listed m the current AALA Directory o! Accredited Laboratones
93-9-65
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 6I5-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED March 30, 198 7
PROJECT CODE. ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER: 408924.13. 71
PAGE_~J~0~ OF 16
Sar.,ple Description: Sample #8, 2/25/87, (2-propanol)
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Tentative Identification (1)
2-propano l
cyclotrisiloxane,hexamethyl-
Fraction
VOA
VOA
Concentration (2)
(µg/liter)
6,500,000
900,000
Remarks: (1) Identification is based on computer search of N.B.S. Library.
~-::;:, .. ..::..-:~~
il
(2) Concentration is based on a response factor of 1.00 relative to the internal standard.
B Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 2/27/87
· Approved;f/ Laboratory Manager
aa_ na_ Accredl!ed by the Amencan A.sso:::1ation !or Laboratory Accreditallon m the chemical ..,..,~ Heid 01 tesung. as listed m the current AN...A Directory 01 Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED: March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER 40892 4, 13, 71
PAGE _ __,1...,1_ OF 16
Sample Description: Sample #9, 2/25/87, (2-propanol)
VOLATILE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
.--}~";/\_
. :// , ..... ~ •. --. ·'7.._ -
--
Con cent ration
(µg/1 iter)
Concentration
Compound
chloromethane
bromomethane
vinyl chloride
chloroethane
methylene chloride
acetone
carbon disulfide
1,1-dichloroethene
1,1-dichloroethane
trans-1,2-dichloroethene
chloroform
1,2-dichloroethane
2-butanone
1,1,1-trichloroethane
carbon tetrachloride
vinyl acetate
bromodichloromethane
1,000,000 U
1,000,000 U
1,000,000 U
1,000,000 U
380,000 BJ
490,000 J
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
1,000,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
1,000,000 U
500,000 U
Compound
1,2-dichloropropane
trans-1,3-dichloropropene
trichloroethene
dibromochloromethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
benzene
cis-1,3-dichloropropene
2-chloroethylvinylether
bromoform
4-methyl-2-pentanone
2-hexanone
tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
toluene
chlorobenzene
ethyl benzene
styrene
total xylenes
(µg/liter)
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
1,000,000 U
500,000 U
1,000,000 U
1,000,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
500,000 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit. B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 3/2/87
Approved Laboratory Manager
Title
---na._ Accredited by the Amencan Asso::ial!on !or Laboratory .A.ccred.Jtat1on in the chem1cal ......,~ held 01 testing. as l1Sted m the current AAfJ.. Directory al Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
[i] INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED: March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDERNUMBER 408924,13,71
PAGE 12 OF 16
Sample Description: Sample #9, 2/25/87, (2-propanol)
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Tentative Identification (1)
arsenousacid,tris(trimethyl)ester
2-propanol
Fraction
VOA
VOA
Concentration (2)
(µg/1 iter)
1,000,000
1,800,000
Remarks: (1) Identification is based on computer search of N.B.S. Library.
(2) Concentration is based on a response factor of 1.00 relative to the
internal standard.
B Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 3/2/87
Approved Laboratory Manager
Title
--f'a Accredited by the Amencan Asso,:iallon !or Laboraiory Accred.l!o!Jon in the chemical
..,....,-~ held ct testing. as ltsted m the current AAl..A Directory 01 Accred1ted Laborcr1ones
93-9-65
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71 PAGE_~l.,,3c._ OF 16
Sample Description: Sample #10, 2/25/87, Travel Blank
VOLATILE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Con cent ration Concentration
Compound (µg/l iter) Compound (µg/liter)
chloromethane 10. u 1,2-dichloropropane 5 u bromomethane 10. u trans-1,3-dichloropropene 5 u vinyl chloride 10. u trichloroethene 5 u ch l oroethane 10. u dibromochloromethane 5 u methylene chloride 4 BJ 1,1,2-trichloroethane 5 u acetone 10. u benzene 5 u carbon disulfide 5 u cis-1,3-dichloropropene 5 u 1,1-dichloroethene 5 u 2-chloroethylvinylether 10. u 1,1-dichloroethane 5 u bromoform 5 u trans-1,2-dichloroethene 5 u 4-methyl-2-pentanone 10. u chloroform 5 u 2-hexanone 10. u 1,2-dichloroethane 5 u tetrachloroethene 5 u 2-butanone 10. u 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 5 u 1,1,1-trichloroethane 5 u toluene 5 u carbon tetrachloride 5 u chl orobenzene 5 u vinyl acetate 10. u ethyl benzene 5 u bromodichloromethane 5 u styrene 5 u
total xyl enes 5 u
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit. B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 3/2/87
aa na_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso:tahan !or Lobo~ory Accredital!On m the chemical .,...,~ 11eld o! lestmg. as listed m the current A.Al.A Dtrec1ory oJ Accredited Laborotones
93-9-65
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 3792 i • 615-588-6401
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
Sample Description: Sample #10, 2/25/87, Travel Blank
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
March 30, 1987
ITEK 23887
408924.13. 71
14 OF 16
Tentative Identification (1)
2-propanol
cyclotrisiloxane,hexamethyl-
Fraction·
Concentration (2)
(µg/liter)
VOA
VOA
130
9
Remarks: (1) Identification is based on computer search of N.B.S. Library.
~::;-.r.=...c:~~ -~--c:~~,::---::(ji~--
(2) Concentration is based on a response factor of 1.00 relative to the internal standard.
B .Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 3/2/87
Approved Laboratory Manager
Tille
&& r1lll_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:iallon tor Laboratory Accred.Jtat1on m the chemical ..,...,~ held 01 testing. as listed m the current AAf..A Directory o! Accrecllted Laboratones
93-9-85
[D INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 6', 5-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
Sample Description: Method Blank Summary
Date of
March 30, 1987
ITEK 23887
408924.13. 71
15 OF 16
Sample No. Analysis Fraction Matrix Compound Con cent ration
Method Blank 1 2/27/87 VOA Water None
Method Blank 2 2/27/87 VOA Water Methylene chloride
2/27/87 VOA Water Acetone
2/27/87 VOA Water Cyclotrisiloxane,
hexamethyl -
Method Blank 3 3/2/87 VOA Water Methylene chloride
Method Blank 1 3/3/87 BNA Water 4,6-Dinitro-2-
methyl phenol
3/3/87 BNA Water N-nitrosodiphenylamine
3/3/87 BNA Water Pentachlorophenol
3/3/87 BNA Water Unknown
Method Blank 1 3/10/87 Pest Water None
3/16/87 Pest Water None
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
Approved Laboratory Manager
Tille
&a fl.Ill. Accredited by the Amencan Asso,:1alion !Or Labo_rotory Accred.1t011on in the chemical ~~ !1eld o! tesllng. as listed m the current AAf.A Du-ec1ory ol Accredited Laboratones
2 J
2 J
9 J
3 J
6 J
8 J
6 J
27 J
93-9-65
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
• ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Ale1,ine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE. __ )~6=A OF 16
Sample Description: Water Surrogate Percent Recovery Su1T111ary
VOLATILE PEST! C IDE Sample Toluene-DB BFB 1,2 Dichloroethane-D4 Dibutylchlorendate**
No. (88-110) (86-115) (78-114) (24-154)
Sample #6 101 101 91
Sample #7 101 101 98
Sample #8 104 113 91
Sample #9 96 101 93
Sample #10 92 100 97
Sample #7 92 100 98
Sample #1 93
Method Blank 1 106 108 99 94
Method Blank 2 101 111 90
Method Blank 3 101 102 96
**Advisory Limits Only
. ~,a, 'zfC ~L.4--tel
Approved Laboratory Manager
Title
aa na. Accredited by the Amencan Asso::1ation !or Laboratory Acced.Jtallon m the chemical ..,...,~ r1eld cl testing, as listed m the current A.Al.A Directory o! Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville, Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED: March 30, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23887
ORDER NUMBER: 408924.13. 71
PAGE 168 OF 16
Sample Description: Water Surrogate Percent Recovery Summary
Sample
No.
Sample #1
Method Blank
SEMI-VOLATILE
Nitro-2-Fluoro-Terphenyl-2-Fl uoro-
Benzene-D5 Biphenyl Dl4 Phenol-D5 Pheno 1
(36-114) (43-116) (33-141) (10-94) (21-100)
79 79 85 38 41
1 86 86 77 34 56
Approved Laboratory Manager
Title
all. f'a_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso=1at1on !or Lobora1ory Accredi!at1o_n in the chemical
,.,....,~ held cl testing, as listed m the current AAf..A Directory cl .A.ccredited Laboratones
2,4,6
Tribromo-
Pheno 1
(10-123)
72
76
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 3792i • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OFANAL YSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED Apri 1 6, 1987
PROJECTCODE ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER: 408924.13, 71
PAGE_~_.□F 23
Sample Description: BH03 (3'-6'-9'-12'-lS'ft)-1, 3/2/87, 1130 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
VOLATILE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
--:?~-:r._~~
,:-.ec·.-~ -~. ·_
-~::~,~=l
Concentration Concentration
Compound (µg/kg dry weight) Compound (µg/kg dry weight)
chloromethane 10. U 1,2-dichloropropane 5 u
bromomethane 10. U trans-1,3-dichloropropene 5 u
vinyl chloride 10. U t rich lo roethene 5 u
chloroethane 10. U dibromochloromethane 5 u
methylene chloride 9 1,1,2-trichloroethane 2 J
acetone 89 benzene 5 u
carbon disulfide 5 u cis-1,3-dichloropropene 5 u
1,1-dichloroethene 5 u 2-chloroethylvinylether 10. u
1,1-dichloroethane 5 u bromoform 10. u
trans-1,2-dichloroethene 5 u 4-methyl-2-pentanone 10. u
chloroform 5 u 2-hexanone 10. u
1,2-dichloroethane 240 tetrachloroethene 5 u
2-butanone 10. u 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 5 u
1,1,1-trichloroethane 5 u toluene 5 u
carbon tetrachloride 5 u chlorobenzene 5 u
vinyl acetate 10. u ethyl benzene 2 J
bromodichloromethane 5 u styrene 5 u
total xyl enes 9
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 3/11/87
Approved Laboratory Manager
Tille
--["a Accredited by the Amencan Asso=1ot1on Jar Laboratory Accred.J!ation in the chem1col
......,~ lleld al testing. as listed 1n the current AAfJ\ Directory ol Accredited Laborotones
93-9-BS
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED Apri 1 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE: ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13, 71
PAGE _ _,____OF 23
Sample Description: BH03 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1130 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
~-~~. --; ~, ~
[';j)
Concentration Concentration
Compound (µg/kg dry weight)
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
benzyl alcohol
1,2-dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine
hexachloroethane
nitrobenzene
isophorone
bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
naphthalene
4-chloroaniline
hexachlorobutadiene
2-methylnaphthalene
hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2-chloronaphthalene
2-nitroanil ine
dimethyl phthalate
acenaphthylene
3-nitroani 1 i ne
acenaphthene
dibenzofuran
2,4-dinitrotoluene
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
Compound
2,6-dinitrotoluene
diethylphthalate
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
fl uorene
4-nitroanil ine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine 1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
hexachlorobenzene
phenanthrene
anthracene
di-n-butylphthalate
fl uoranthene
pyrene
butylbenzylphthalate
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine
benzo(a)anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
chrysene
di-n-octyl phthalate
benzo(b)fluoranthene
benzo(k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
(µg/kg dry weight'.
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
110 JB
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
61 J
67 J
330 U
660 U
330 U
180 J
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
s amp 1 e.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
1 -Detected as diphenylamine.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/4/87
3/11/87
Approved Laboratory Manager
Title
aa na Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:1ahon !or Lobo_ratory Accreditation in 1he chem1cal
..,....,~ 11eld o! testing, as listed in the current AAl.A Directory al Accredited Laborotones
93·9-EIS
[i] INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATEREPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE: ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE _ _.,__OF 23
Sample Description: BH03 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1130 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
ACID EXTRACTABLE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Concentration Con cent ration Compound (µg/kg dry weight) Compound ( µg/kg dry weight)
phenol
2-chl orophenol
2-methylphenol
4-methyl phenol
2-nitrophenol
2,4-dimethylphenol
benzoic acid
2,4-dichlorophenol
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
600 JB
330 U
4-chloro-3-methylphenol 330 U
2,4,6-trichlorophenol 330 U
2,4,5-trichlorophenol 1,600 U
2 ,4-di nitrophenol 1,600 U
4-nitrophenol 1,600 U
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol 1,600 U
pentachlorophenol 130 J
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
J -lndi cat es an estimated value less than the detection 1 imit. B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/4/87
3/ 11/87
Laboratory Manager
Title
--rla Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:1at1on for Labo_ratory Accreditation m the chem1ca! .,...,~ held 01 testing. as !ISied in the current AM.A D1rec1ory 01 Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
.._.,,,---...._.. rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
• ANALYTICAL
SERVICES • .-7;-~~~:~~ ~
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401 i)~{~{
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
April 6, 1987
ITEK 23915
408924.13. 71
4 OF 23
Sample Description: BH03 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1130 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST -PESTICIDE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Compound
a-BHC
Concentration
(µg/kg dry weight) Compound
• eon cent ration
(µg/kg dry weight)
e-BHC
5-BHC
y-BHC (lindane)
heptachlor
aldrin
heptachlor epoxide
endosulfan I
dieldrin
4,4'-DDE
endrin
endosul fan II
4,4'-DDD
11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
22 U
22 U
22 U
22 U
22 U
endosulfan sulfate
4,4'-DDT
methoxychlor
endri n ketone
chlordane
toxaphene
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroc lo r 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
22 U
22 U
110 U
22 U
110 U
220 U
110 U
110 U
110 U
110 U
110 U
220 U
220 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted: 3/4/87
Date Analyzed: 3/11/87
Approved L b t a ora ory Manager
Title
---fa Accredited by the Amencan Asso::ialion !or Laboratory Accred1tation in the chemical
.,....,~ held ol testing. as l1Sted 10 the current AAl.A Directory 01 J\ccred1ted Laboratones
93.9.1:15
rn INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATEREPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECTCODE: ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE _ _,,__ OF 23
Sample Description: BH03 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1130 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Tentative Identification (1)
unknown
. unknown
benzene,methyl-
3-hexene,2,5-dimethyl-{E)-
acetic acid,1-methylethyl ester
2-pentanone,4-hydroxy-4-methyl*
heptane,2,3-dimethyl-
unknown (saturated hydrocarbon)
heptane,4-(1-methylethyl)-
unknown
2-butanone,4-chloro-4,4-difluoro-
2-hexanone,6-{acetyloxy)-
2,5-hexanedione
2{5H)-furanone,5,5-dimethyl-
3-heptanone,2,4-dimethyl-
pentane,1-{ethenyloxy)-
u nknown
hexadecanoic acid
octadecanoic acid
unknown
unknown (saturated hydrocarbon)
arsenou saci d, tri s ( t rimethyl s i lyl ) ester
*Suspected aldol condensate.
Fraction
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
VOA
Concentration (2)
(µg/kg dry weight)
260
210
2,200
200
2,900 8
25,000 8
2,700 8
4,200
6,300
270
360 8
1,400 B
210
560 8
960
330
•l,700
1,000 8
910
2,100
610
13
Remarks: {l) Identification is based on computer search of N.B.S. Library.
(2) Concentration is based on a response factor of 1.00 relative to the
internal standard.
B Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/ 4/87
3/11/87
Approved by!)
Laboratory Manager
Title
aa flll. AccredJled by the Amencan Asso::1at1on for Laboratory Accreciitallon 10 the chemical
,_,...,~ held ol testing. as !isled m the current AAl..A Directory al Accred.1!ed Loboratones
93-9·85
[D INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401 1
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
April 6, 1987
ITEK 23915
408924.13. 71
PAGE _ __.,__OF ---<2__,3_
Sample Description: BH05 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
VOLATILE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Concentration Concentration
Compound (µg/kg dry weight) Compound (µg/kg dry weight)
chloromethane 10. U 1,2-dichloropropane 5 u
bromomethane 10. u trans-1,3-dichloropropene 5 u vinyl chloride 10. U tri ch l oroethene 5 u
chloroethane 10. U dibromochloromethane 5 u
methylene chloride 6 1,1,2-trichloroethane 5 u
acetone 140 benzene 5 u
carbon disulfide 5 u cis-1,3-dichloropropene 5 u
1,1-dichloroethene 5 u 2-chloroethylvinylether 5 u
1,1-dichloroethane 5 u bromoform 10. u
trans-1,2-dichloroethene 5 u 4-methyl-2-pentanone 10. u
chloroform 5 u 2-hexanone 10. u
1,2-dichloroethane 5 u tetrachloroethene 5 u
2-butanone 18 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 5 u
1,1,1-trichloroethane 5 u toluene 2 J
carbon tetrachloride 5 u chlorobenzene 5 u
vinyl acetate 10. u ethyl benzene 5 u
bromodichloromethane 5 u styrene 5 u
total xyl enes 5
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 3/11/87
Laboratory Manager
Title
---fla Accredited by the Amencan />..sso::1alion !or Laboro1ory Accrechlallon m the chem1ca!
.,....,~ !1eld o! testing. as llSted m the current AAu.. Directory ct Accredited Laborotones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401 ,
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924 .13. 71
PAGE _ _,__ OF 23
Sample Description: BH05 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-1, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Concentration
Compound (µg/kg dry weight) Compound
2,6-dinitrotoluene
diethylphthalate
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
fl uorene
Concentration
(µg/kg dry weight:
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
benzyl alcohol
1,2-dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropyl )ether
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine
hexachloroethane
nitrobenzene
isophorone
bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
naphthalene
4-chloroaniline
hexachlorobutadiene
2-methylnaphthalene
hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2-chloronaphthalene
2-nitroaniline
dimethyl phtha late
acenaphthylene
3-nitroaniline
acenaphthene
dibenzofuran
2,4-dinitrotoluene
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
4-n itroanil i ne
N-nitrosodiphenylamine 1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
hexachlorobenzene
phenanthrene
anthracene
di-n-butylphthalate
fl uoranthene
pyrene
butylbenzylphthalate
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine
benzo(a)anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
chrysene
di-n-octyl phthalate
benzo(b)fluoranthene
benzo(k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
220 JB
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
63 J
72 J
330 U
660 U
330 U
50.J
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
1 -Detected as diphenylamine.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/4/87
3/11/87
Approved . Laboratory Manager
Title
aa na_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:iation Jar Laboratory Accred.Jtat1on m the chem1cal
.,.._,~ held ol 1estmg. as listed m the current A.Af.A Direc1ory oJ Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
• ANALYTICAL
SERVICES • ,.,..:;-,..-..::.-.:,_~ .~~?~-~::;:-_
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6e01 ~,it~tl
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors_ Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
April 6, 1987
ITEK 23915
408924 .13. 71
8 OF 23
Sample Description: BH05 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
ACID EXTRACTABLE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Concentration Con cent ration
Compound (µg/kg dry weight) Compound (µg/kg dry weight)
phenol
2-chlorophenol
2-methyl phenol
4-methyl phenol
2-nitrophenol
2,4-dimethylphenol
benzoic acid
2,4-dichlorophenol
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
210 JB
330 U
4-chloro-3-methylphenol 330 U
2,4,6-trichlorophenol 330 U
2,4,5-trichlorophenol 1,600 U
2,4-dinitrophenol 1,600 U
4-nitrophenol 1,600 U
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol 1,600 U
pentachlorophenol 1,600 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/4/87
3/11/87
. Approvedv Laboratory Manager
Title
a& f1ll. Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:1at1on tor Labo_rotory Acc:-ed1talion m the chemical
,......,~ held ol !estmg. as l1Sted m the current AAfJ.. Directory ot Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588°6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
DATE REPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23915
ORDERNUMBER 408924.13.71
PAGE __ g~ OF 23
Sample Description: BH05 (3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil) received March 4, 1987
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST -PESTICIDE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Con cent ration Concentration
Compound (µg/kg dry weight) Compound (µg/kg dry weight)
a-BHC 11 u endosulfan sulfate 22 U
e-BHC 11 u 4,4'-DDT 22 U o-BHC 11 u methoxychlor 110 U
y-BHC (l indane) 11 u endri n ketone 22 U heptachlor 11 u chlordane 110 U aldrin 11 u toxaphene 220 U heptachlor epoxide 11 u Aroclor 1016 110 U
endosulfan I 11 u Aroclor 1221 110 U
dieldrin 22 u Aroclor 1232 110 U 4,4'-DDE 22 U Aroclor 1242 110 U endri n 22 U Aroclor 1248 110 U endosulfan II 22 U Aroclor 1254 220 U 4,4'-DDD 22 U Aroclor 1260 220 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample. B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/4/87
3/11/87
Approved , Laboratory Manager
Title
a& na_ Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:1at1on lor Laboratory Accred1tahon in the chemical .,...,-~ 11eld o! testing, as ltsted in 1he current AAf..A Directory ol Accredited Loboratones
93·9·85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
• ANALYTICAL
SERVICES • .-;}33}\:-
. '' '
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401 :~~;~V
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATEREPORTED April 6, 1987
PROJECT CODE: ITEK 23915
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE __ l._Q,_ OF 23
Sample Description: BH05 {3'-6'-9'-12'-15'ft)-l, 3/2/87, 1500 (Soil) received
March 4, 1987
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Tentative Identification (1)
unknown
Fraction
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
BNA
VOA
Concentration (2)
(µg/kg dry weight)
400
1,3,5-cycloheptatriene
acetic acid,1-methylethyl ester
heptane,3,5-dimethyl-
2-pentanone,4-hydroxy-4-methyl-*
heptane,2,3-dimethyl-
unknown (saturated hydrocarbon)
heptane,4-(l-methylethyl)-
heptane,2,2,4-trimethyl-
unknown
2-hexanone,6-{acetyloxy)-
2(5H)-furanone,5,5-dimethyl-
3-heptanone,2,4-dimethyl-
unknown
unknown
1,1'-biphenyl
benzene,1,1'-oxybis-
phosphori c acid, tri butyl ester
unknown
heptadecane
unknown {hydrocarbon)
hexadecanoic acid
unknown
unknown
unknown
octadecanoic acid
unknown
*Suspected aldol condensate.
2,300
3,600 B
830
28,000 B
3,400 B
5,000
7,300
290
400
1,500 B
1,500 B
1,300
340
890
310
220
270
630
260
340
920 B
330
860
380
570
13
Remarks: ( 1)
( 2)
Identification is based on computer search of N.B.S. Library.
Concentration is based on a response factor of 1.00 relative to
internal standard.
Date
Date
B Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Extracted: 3/4/87
Analyzed: 3/11/87
. Appro~
Title
Laboratory Manager
aa rs_ Accred1!ed by the Amencan Asso:ia!lon lor Laboratory Accred1!at1on m the chemical
.......,-~ held ol testing. as listed m the current AA1J,.. Directory 01 Accredited Laboratones
the
93-9·65
rn INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401 1
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED: April 15, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23985
ORDER NUMBER 40892 4 .13. 71
PAGE _ _.__ OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS16-20 Ft-1, 3/14/87, 1535 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
VOLATILE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Con cent ration Concentration
Compound
chloromethane
bromomethane
vinyl chloride
chloroethane
methylene chloride
acetone
carbon disulfide
1,1-dichloroethene
1,1-dichloroethane
trans-1,2-dichloroethene
chloroform
1,2-dichloroethane
2-butanone
1,1,1-trichloroethane
carbon tetrachloride
vinyl acetate
bromodichloromethane
(µg/kg dry weight)
1,000 U
1,000 U
1,000 U
1,000 U
500 U
31,000 B
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
1,000 U
500 U
500 U
1,000 U
500 U
Compound
1,2-dichloropropane
trans-1,3-dichloropropene
trichloroethene
dibromochloromethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
benzene
cis-1,3-dichloropropene
2-chloroethylvinylether
bromoform
4-methyl-2-pentanone
2-h exanone
tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
toluene
chlorobenzene
ethyl benzene
styrene
total xylenes
(µg/kg dry weight)
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
1,000 U
500 U
1,000 U
1,000 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 3/19/87
Sworn lo and subsc~beq belorf,me,lhis 15th
dayol Aprll, ~tj/
Mycomm1ss1onexpires . Q January lb, 1988
an"<c,c:5: ~r< Neta he Title
aa ra Accredited by 1he Amencan Asso.:::ia!ion !or Laboratory Accred1tation m the chem1cal
.,..,~ held o! testing. as listed m the current AAl.A Directory al Accredited Laboratones
93·9-85
m INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED Apri 1 15, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23985
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE_.,____Of 17
Sample Description: BH-NS16-20 Ft-1, 3/14/87, 1535 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Concentration
Compound
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
(µg/kg dry weight)
960
benzyl alcohol
1,2-dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine
hexachloroethane
nitrobenzene
isophorone
bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
naphthalene
4-chl oroani 1 i ne
hexachlorobutadiene
2-methylnaphthalene
hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2-chloronaphthalene
2-nitroanil ine
dimethyl phthalate
acenaphthylene
3-nitroaniline
acenaphthene
di benzofu ran
2,4-dinitrotoluene
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
Compound
2,6-dinitrotoluene
diethylphthalate
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
fl uorene
4-nitroanil ine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine 1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
hexachlorobenzene
phenanthrene
anthracene
di-n-butylphthalate
flu oranthene
pyrene
butylbenzylphthalate
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine
benzo(a)anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
chrysene
di-n-octyl phthalate
benzo(b)fluoranthene
benzo(k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Con cent ration
(µg/kg dry weight
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
120 JB
330 U
330 U
330 U
660 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected, The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
1 -Detected as diphenylamine.
Date Extracted: 3/20/87; Date Analyzed: 3/23/87
Sworn to and subscnbed belore me this 15th
ctay at A ril, 1987
M 16, 1988
Approved Laboratory Manager
Title
aa na_ Accredited by the Amencon Asso.:iation !or Labo_ratory Accreditation in the chemical
...,,,..,~ held o! testing. as ltsted in the current A.AfJ,.,. Directory al Accredited Laboratones 93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES • i 5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401 !
TO .. IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED Apri 1 15, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23985
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13, 71
PAGE_~~ OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS16-20 Ft-1, 3/14/87, 1535 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
ACID EXTRACTABLE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Con cent ration Concentration
Compound (µg/kg dry weight) Compound (µg/kg dry weight)
phenol
2-chlorophenol
2-methyl phenol
4-methylphenol
2-nitrophenol
2,4-dimethylphenol
benzoic acid
2,4-dichlorophenol
330 U
330 U
330 U
100 J
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
4-chloro-3-methylphenol 330 U
2,4,6-trichlorophenol 330 U
2,4,5-trichlorophenol 1,600 U
2,4-dinitrophenol 1,600 U
4-nitrophenol 1,600 U
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol 1,600 U
pentachlorophenol 69 JB
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit. B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted: 3/20/87
3/23/87 Date Analyzed:
16, 1988
Approved Laboratory Manager
Tille
a& fla. Accredited by the Amencan Asso.:iat1on !or Labo_ratory Accredilalio_n tn the chem1ca! .,.....~., held o! testing. as listed in the current A.Af.A Directory 01 Accred1ted Laboratones
93.9.55
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
Apri 1 15, 1987
ITEK 23985
408924.13. 71
4 OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS16-20 Ft-1, 3/14/87, 1535 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST -PESTICIDE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Cance nt ration Concentration
Compound (µg/kg dry weight) Compound (µg/kg dry weight)
cx-BHC 12 U endosulfan sulfate 24 U
8-BHC 12 U 4,4'-DDT 24 U
6-BHC 12 U methoxychl or 120 U
y-BHC (lindane) 12 U endri n ketone 24 U
heptachlor 12 U chlordane 120 U
aldrin 12 U toxaphene 240 U
h eptach 1 or epoxide 12 U Aroclor 1016 120 U
endosulfan I 12 U Aroclor 1221 120 U
dieldrin 24 U Aroclor 1232 120 U
4,4'-DDE 24 U Aroclor 1242 120 U
endrin 24 U Aroclor 1248 120 U
endosulfan I I 24 U Aroclor 1254 240 U
4,4'-DDD 24 U Aroclor 1260 240 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/20/87
3/25/87
Sworn lo and SUbSCQbec( belorr,lll.e,lh1s __ 1_5_t_h __
dayot Aprl I' '::H5/ January 16, 1988 My ommission expires -,---------
_ _.,._____o._;c_ <i .. Approved -;f
Tille
Laboratory Manager
aa na. Accredited by the Amencan .Asso::1at1on Jor Labo_ra1ory Accredilalion in the chemical
.._.....~ held at testing. as listed in the current AAf.A Otrectory ot Accredlled Laborotones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
0 • I •
• ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TO: IT Corporation DATE REPORTED: April 15, 1987
ITEK 23985
408924.13.71
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Di rectors Ori ve
Knoxville, TN 37923
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE 5 OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS16-20 Ft-1, 3/14/87, 1535 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Tentative Identification {l) Fraction
4-penten-2-0L VOA
butane,2-methyl-VOA
ethane,l,l'-oxybis[2-chloro-VOA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
furan,2,5-dimethyl-BNA
acetic acid,1-methylethyl ester BNA
unknown BNA
heptane,2,3-dimethyl-BNA
octane,4-methyl-BNA
carbamic acid,1-methylethyl ester BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
diphosphoric acid,tetraethyl ester BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
l,3-propanediol,2-ethyl-2-{hydroxymethyl)-BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
hexadecanoic acid BNA
unknown BNA
Concentration (2)
(µg/kg dry weight)
1,200
900
1,600
4,300
2,600
1,300
4,100 B
37,000
2,300 B
3,100 B
7,800
16,000
3,100
980
_830
7,500
690
3,400
2,300
570
750
1,100
960
810 B
660
Remarks: ( 1)
(2)
Identification is based on computer search of N.B.S. Library.
Concentration is based on a response factor of 1.00 relative to the
internal standard.
B Analyte was found-in the blank as well as the sample.
Date
Date
Extracted: 3/20/87 -BNA
Analyzed: 3/19/87 -VOA, 3/23/87 -BNA
Sworn to and subscpbed betori,,.)le, ttus, __ l_5_t_h __ day ct Apr, I , !~tl/
My January 16, 1988
Tille
--f'a Accredited by the Amencan A.sso:::1a!ion !or I...abo_ratory Accredilahon in the chemical
,.....,~ held ol testmg. as listed in the current AAfA Directory at Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION .. ' . • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
April 15, 1987
ITEK 23985
408924.13. 71
6 OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS07-20 Ft-1, 3/15/87, 1600 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
VOLATILE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Compound
chloromethane
bromomethane
vinyl chloride
chloroethane
methylene chloride
acetone
carbon disulfide
1,1-dichloroethene
1,1-dichloroethane
trans-1,2-dichloroethene
chloroform
1,2-dichloroethane
2-butanone
1,1,1-trichloroethane
carbon tetrachloride
vinyl acetate
bromodichloromethane
Concentration
(µg/kg dry weight)
500 U
500 U
500 U
500 U
250 U
17,000 B
250 U
250 U
250 U
250 U
250 U
250 U
500 U
250 U
250 U
500 U
250 U
Compound
1,2-dichloropropane
trans-1,3-dichloropropene
trichloroethene
dibromochloromethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
benzene
cis-1,3-dichloropropene
2-chloroethylvinylether
bromoform
4-methyl-2-pentanone
2-hexanone
tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
toluene
chlorobenzene
ethyl benzene
styrene
total xylenes
Con cent ration
(µg/kg dry weight)
250 U
250 U
250 U
250 U
250 U
250 U
250 U
500 U
250 U
500 U
500 U
250 U
250 U
620
250 U
250 U
250 U
250 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Analyzed: 3/19/87
16, 1988
·Title
---fla Accredited by the Amencon Asso.:iat1on lor Laboratory Accredltation in !he chemical
,.,...,~ held o! testing. as listed in the current AAlA Directory ol Accredited Laborotones
93.9.as
rn INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED April 15, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23985
ORDER NUMBER: 408924.13. 71
PAGE _ _,__ OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS07-20 Ft-1, 3/15/87, 1600 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Compound
bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Con cent ration
(µg/kg dry weight)
1,100
330 U
330 U
330 U benzyl alcohol
1,2-dichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine
hexachloroethane
nitrobenzene
isophorone
bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
naphtha 1 ene
4-chloroaniline
hexachlorobutadiene
2-methylnaphthalene
hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2-chloronaphthalene
2-nitroaniline
dimethyl phthalate
acenaphthylene
3-nitroaniline
acenaphthene
dibenzofuran
2,4-dinitrotoluene
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
Comeound
2,6-dinitrotoluene
diethylphthalate
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
fl uorene
4-nitroanil ine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine1
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
hexachlorobenzene
phenanthrene
anthracene
di-n-butylphthalate
fluoranthene
pyrene
butylbenzylphthalate
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine
benzo(a)anthracene
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
chrysene
di-n-octyl phthalate
benzo(b)fluoranthene
benzo(k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Concentration
(µg/kg dry weight
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
120 JB
330 U
330 U
330 U
660 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
330 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit. B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample. 1 -Detected as diphenylamine.
Date Extracted: 3/20/87; Date Analyzed: 3/23/87
Sworn to and subscribed before me this __ l_5_t_h __
day ot April , 1987
My~c mmissione_xpires. _ January 16, 1988 ~'~~ ~~x:~~~(
ry lie f
Approvedb/' Laboratory Manager
Tille
..... na_ Accredited by the Arnencan As.so::1allon !or Loboralory Accreditation in the chem1cal .,..,~ held at testing, as listed in the current AAlA Directory cl Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
@ INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED·.
PROJECT CODE: -ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
Apri 1 15, 1987
ITEK 23985
408924.13. 71
8 OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS07-20 Ft-1, 3/15/87, 1600 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
ACID EXTRACTABLE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST COMPOUNDS
Con cent ration Con cent ration
Compound (µg/kg dry weight) Compound (µg/kg dry weight)
phenol
2-chl orophenol
2-methy l pheno 1
4-methyl phenol
2-nitrophenol
2,4-dimethylphenol
benzoic acid
2,4-dichlorophenol
330 U
330 U
330 U
88 J
330 U
330 U
1,600 U
330 U
4-chloro-3-methylphenol 330 U
2,4,6-trichlorophenol 330 U
2,4,5-trichlorophenol 1,600 U
2,4-dinitrophenol. 1,600 U
4-nitrophenol 1,600 U
4,6-dinitro-2-methyl phenol 1,600 U
pentachlorophenol 1,600 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the sample.
J -Indicates an estimated value less than the detection limit. B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
3/20/87
3/23/87
Sworn to and subscnbed belore me this __ 1_5_t_h __ ctay 01 April 1 1987
My January 16, 1988
Approved · Laboratory Manager
aa ria Accredited by the Amencon Asso.:1at1on lor Laboratory Accredllation m the chem1cal ......,~ held o! testmg. as hsted m the current AAlA Dtrectory at Accrechted. Loboratones
93-9-85
[D INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES •
5815 Middlebrook Pike • Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
April 15, 1987
ITEK 23985
408924.13.71
9 OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS07-20 Ft-1, 3/15/87, 1600 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE LIST -PESTICIDE AND PCB ANALYSIS
Concentration Con cent ration
Compound (µg/kg dry weight) Compound ( µg/k g dry weight)"
a-BHC 13 U endosulfan sulfate 26 u
8-BHC 13 U 4,4'-DDT 26 U
c-BHC 13 U methoxychlor 130 U
-y-BHC (lindane) 13 U end ri n ketone 26 U
heptachl or 13 U chlordane 130 U
al d ri n 13 U toxaphene 260 U
heptachlor epoxide 13 U Arocl or 1016 130 U
endosulfan I 13 U Aroclor 1221 130 U
dieldrin 26 U Aroclor 1232 130 U
4,4'-DDE 26 U Aroclor 1242 130 U
endrin 26 U Aroclor 1248 130 U
endosulfan II 26 U Aroclor 1254 260 U
4,4'-DDD 26 U Aroclor 1260 260 U
U -Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the detection limit for the
sample.
B -Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted: 3/20/87
3/25/87 Date Analyzed:
16, 1988
Approv;;? · . Laboratory Manager
Tille
---f'a Accredited by the Amencan Asso~iahon Jar Labo_ro1ory Accredi!at1on in the chemical
......,~ held oJ teslmg. as listed in the current AALA Directory 01 Accredited Laboratones
93-9-85
[l] INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION • ANALYTICAL
SERVICES • I . ' ' ., 5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO: IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED:
PROJECT CODE:
ORDER NUMBER:
PAGE
April 15, 1987
ITEK 23985
408924.13.71
10 OF 17
Sample Description: BH-NS07-20 Ft-1, 3/15/87, 1600 (Soil) received March 19, 1987
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Tentative Identification (1) Fraction
4-penten-2-0L VOA
ethane,l,l'-oxybis[2-chloro-VOA
furan,2,5-dimethyl-BNA
acetic acid,1-methylethyl ester BNA
unknown BNA
heptane,2,3-dimethyl-BNA
octane,4-methyl-BNA
carbamic acid,1-methylethyl ester BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
phosphoric acid,triethyl ester BNA
unknown BNA
1,3-propanediol,2-ethyl-2-{hydroxymethyl)-BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
unknown BNA
hexadecanoic acid BNA
Concentration (2)
(µg/kg dry weight)
2,800
760
2,400
4,200 B
32,000
3,500 B
3,500 B
9,400
1,400
18,000
1,800
840
16,000
5,500
3,400
930
2,800
1,700
960
770 B
Remarks: (1) Identification is based on computer search of N.B.S. Library.
(2) Concentration is based on a response factor of 1.00 relative to the
internal standard.
B Analyte was found in the blank as well as the sample.
Date Extracted: 3/20/87 -BNA
Date Analyzed: 3/19/87 -VOA, 3/23/87 -BNA
16, 1988
Title
aa fl.11. Accredited by the Amencan As.so.:iation !or Lobo_rotory Accreditation in the chemical
.,....,~ held cl tes!mg. as listed m the current A.ALA D1rec1ory 01 Accredited Laborotones
93-9-85
@ INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES • 5815 Middlebrook Pike• Knoxville. Tennessee 37921 • 615-588-6401
TO IT Corporation
ATTN: Randy Alewine
312 Directors Drive
Knoxville, TN 37923
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
DATE REPORTED: Apri 1 15, 1987
PROJECT CODE ITEK 23985
ORDER NUMBER 408924.13. 71
PAGE 11 OF 17
METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Sample No.
Method Blank 1
Date of
Analysis Fraction Compound
Concentration
(µg/kg dry weight)
Method Blank 1
Method Blank 1
3-23-87
3-19-87
3-25-87
BNA
VOA
PEST
J -Indicates an estimated value.
Sworn to and subscribed. Qelorf1ll!<,lhis __ l_5_t_h __ ct 01 April, ':Jtit
January 16, 1988
Notary Public
benzoic acid
pentachlorophenol
di-n-butylphthalate
acetic acid,1-methylethyl
ester
unknown
heptane,2,3-dimethyl-
octane,4-methyl-
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
hexadecanoic acid
acetone
none
Approved~ . Laboratory Manager
Title
aa na_ Accredited _by the Amencon Asso::iation tor Laboratory .A.ccredltallon in the chem1cal .......,~ held o! testing. as hstect m the current A.AlJ,,,. Duectory 01 Accredited Labora!ones
110 J
110 J
94 J
1,500 J
15,000 J
1,300 J
1,500 J
310 J
570 J
530 J
450 J
380 J
2.3 J
93-9-85