NCD991278953_19980227_National Starch & Chemical Corp._FRBCERCLA RA_Supplemental Remedial Design Remedial Action Work Plan-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• • . I •
REPORT l ••
' '
Supplemental Remedial
Design/Remedial Action
Work Plan
National Starch & Chemical Company
Cedar Springs Road Plant Site
. Salisbury, North Carolina
February 1998
BBL ______________ BlASLAND, BOUCK&LEE,INC.
engineers & scientists
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
61 FORSYTH STREET, SW
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8909
February 2l, 1998
4WD-NSMB
Mr. David Mattison
North Carolina Department of Environment &
RECEl\/1$0
MAR O 2 1998
SUPERFUND SECTION
Natural Resources/Superfund Section
Suite 150
401 Oberlin Road
Raleigh, NC 27605
' SUBJ: Request to Review Supplemental Remedial Design/Remedial
Action Work Plan for Operable Unit #3 at the National
Starch & Chemical Company Superfund Site
Dear Mr. Mattison:
Enclosed for your information and the State's file are three
copies of the above referenced document. As you can see) this
document was prepared by National Starch & Chemical Company's
(NSCC) new consultant, Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. Please review
this document. In accordance to our verbal commitment to NSCC
made during our February 4 meeting to review documents as quickly
as possible, I would appreciate receiving the State's comments by
Tuesday, March 17, 1998. If you are unable to provide your
comments by this date, please inform me as to when I can expect
to receive them.
· If you have any questions, I can be reached at 404-562-8820.
Sincerely yours,
tK'~::~
Remedial Project Manager
Enclosures
I
1. 3 Copies of "Supplemental Remedial Design/Remedial Action
Work Plan" for Operable Unit #3 at the National Starch &
Chemical Company Superfund Site (February 26, 1998)
Recycted/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Postconsumer)
I
I
1BBL
F!B 2 '/ !9P.R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BLASLAN0, BOUCK & LEE, INC,
engineers & scientists
Transmitted Via Federal Express
February 26, 1998
Mr. Jon Bomholm
Remedial Project Manager
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Atlanta Federal Center
6 I Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
Re: Supplemental Remedial Design/Remedial Action Work Plan
Operable Unit Three
Cedar Springs Road Plant Site
Salisbury, North Carolina
Project#: 05055
Dear Mr. Bomholm:
I
REc;EIVED I
I
MAR ;0-2 1998
!
SUPERFU~D SECTION
!
On behalf of National Starch & Chemical Company (NSCC), Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. (BBL) is pleased
to submit seven (7) bound copies and one (I) unbound copy of the revised Supplementa],Remedial
Design/Remedial (RD/RA) Action Work Plan. This revised work plan has been prepared purstiant to the
meeting with yourself, representatives of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR), NSCC and BBL held in Raleigh, North Carolina on February 4, 1998.i
l
It was a pleasure meeting with you and we look forward to working with you toward the successful
completion of the RD/RA program for Operable Unit Three. If you have any questions or comments, please
' ' do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]. ,
Sincerely,
BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.
Senior Project Engineer
MPF/say
5298!448.A
cc: Douglas Cregar, National Starch & Chemical Company
Alex Samson, National Starch & Chemical Company
Michael Ford, P.E., National Starch & Chemical Company
Ray Paradowski, National Starch & Chemical Company
Richard Franklin, National Starch & Chemical Company
Mr. Joseph J. Hochreiter, Jr., CGWP, Blasland, Bouck &.Lee, Inc.
8 South River Road • Cranbury, NJ 08512-9502
Tel [phone] • Voice Mail [phone] • Fax [phone] • Offices Nationwide
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BBL
BlASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.
engineers a so/on tis ts
8 South River Road
Cranbury, NJ 08512-9502
( 609) 860-0590
TECHNICAL REPORT
Supplemental Remedial
Design/Remedial Action
Work Plan
National Starch & Chemical Company
Cedar Springs Road Plant Site '
Salisbury, North Carolina
February 1998
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table of Contents
Section 1.
Section 2.
Section 3.
Section 4.
5198l<M8A--2/l6/J8
Introduction ............................... _! •••••••••• 1-1
1.1
1.2
Objectives ........................... , .......... 1-1
Report Organization .................... • .......... 1-1
Scope of Work ......................................... 2-1
2.1 Ground-Water Modeling ................. 1 •••••••••• 2-1
2.1.1 Conceptual Model ..... : ............... ,. ......... 2-1
2.1.2 Ground-Water Flow Modeling ....................... 2-2
2.1.3 Solute-Transport Modeling ............... : .......... 2-2
2.2 Vertical Delineation Investigation .......... • .......... 2-2
2.2.1 Vertical Delineation Field Work ...................... 2-3
2.3 Remedial Design ...................... •· ......... 2-3
2.3.1 Preliminary Evaluation .................. : ......... 2-4
Deliverables and Schedule .............................. 3-1
3.1 Deliverables .................................... 3-1
3.2 Schedule ............................ ;_ ......... 3-1
Organization and Responsibilities ........................ 4-1
4.1 Project Officer .................................. 4-1
4.2 Project Certifying Officer ................. • .......... 4-1
4.3 Senior QNQC Modeler ............................ 4-1
4.4 Project Manager/Project Modeler .......... : ......... 4-1
4.5 Project Geologist ...................... i ••••••••• 4-1
4.6 Project Engineer ................................. 4-1
4.7 Senior Modelers ................................. 4-1
BLASL.AND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.
engineers & scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1. Introduction
On behalf of National Starch & Chemical Company (NSCC), Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. (BBL) has prepared this
revised Supplemental Remedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/RA) Work Plan for Operable Unit 3 (OU3) ofNSCC's
Cedar Springs Road Plant Site in Salisbury, North Carolina. Figure I presents a Site Locatio~ Map.
This revised Supplemental RD/RA Work Plan has been prepared in accordance with:
i) the OUJ Record of Decision (ROD) executed on October 7, 1993;
ii) the OUJ and OU4 Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO) executed on September 29, 1995; and
iii) correspondence from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, Septe~ber 22, 1997) and
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR, September 19, 1997)
regarding the Field Investigations Summary Report (FISR, September 1997) and Conceptual Design and
Preliminary Report (September 1997);
iv) correspondence from USEPA (December 5, 1997) and NCDENR (November 25, 1997) regarding the
previous Supplemental RD/RA Work Plan submitted on November 4, 1997; and
v) a meeting with representatives ofNSCC, BBL, USEPA and NCDENR in Raleigh, North Carolina on
February 4, 1998.
This Supplemental RD/RA Work Plan shall supersede in its entirety a previous Supplemental RD/RA Work Plan
submitted byNSCC on November 4, 1997. This Supplemental RD/RA Work Plan incorporates,the following site-
related documents by reference:
i) Field Sampling and Analysis Plan (FSAP, NSCC, July 1996); and
ii) Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP, NSCC, July 1996).
1.1 Objectives
The objectives of the supplemental remedial design investigation are to perform the following tasks in the most
expedient manner possible:
I I i) implement a remedy for OUJ which effectively limits the potential for off-site migration of constituents from
the impacted ground water; and
ii) provide vertical delineation of impacted ground water in bedrock.
The objectives of this Supplemental RD/RA Work Plan are to provide detailed information on the proposed ground-
water modeling and vertical delineation.
1.2 Report Organization
This report is organized into the following sections:
Section I
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
A.\Sl981448.A --2/16/JS
Introduction;
Scope of Work;
Deliverables and Schedule; and
Organization and Responsibilities.
BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE. INC.
engineers & scientists 1-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2. Scope of Work
BBL proposes the scope of work described herein to achieve the objectives set forth in the pre\,ious section. The
scope of work is separated into four distinct activities: i
i) Ground-Water Modeling;
ii) Vertical Delineation Investigation;
iii) Remedial Design; and
iv) Remedial Construction/Implementation.
The additional remedial design and remedial action activities are dependent on the results of the ground-water
modeling and vertical delineation activities. Additional detail on these activities will be pro~ided in addendum
correspondence to this Supplemental RD/RA Work Plan. !
I
2.1 Ground-Water Modeling
The ground-water modeling activities will be used as a tool to guide the vertical delineation of gr~und-water impacts
' and the design of an extraction system to effectively limit the potential for off-site impacts from I constituents in the
OU3 ground water. The Ground-Water Modeling will be comprised of the following tasks: !
i) Conceptual Model;
ii) Numerical Ground-Water Flow Model; and
iii) Solute-Transport Model.
2: 1.1 Conceptual Model
The development of a robust conceptual hydrogeologic model is of paramount importance to a ~uccessful ground-
water modeling program. A conceptual model presents the most current understanding of the important features of
the site ground-water flow and solute-transport mechanisms. These features are subsequently used to construct
numerical and analytical models to provide predictive and analytical tools to achieve the objectives of the whole
RD/RA program.
The conceptual model for the site will include:
i) an interpretation of important regional, local and site geologic features;
ii) an interpretation of important regional, local and site hydro logic features; i
iii) an interpretation of the likely source of impacts to ground water and an estimate of the source term;
iv) initial estimates ofhydrogeologic and solute-transport parameters (i.e., hydraulic conductivity, anisotropy,
recharge, retardation, dispersion, etc.); and
v) information on the preliminary construction of the numerical ground-water flow model (i.e., vertical and
horizontal model domain, grid discretization, internal and external boundaries, initial calibration estimates,
I etc.). 1
!
BBL has completed a preliminary review of published reports pertinent to the site, local area aAd region. Table I
presents a list of the reports. Through this process, an initial list of site data gaps was develo11ed. The data gaps
consist of synoptic measurements of head and flow relationships for the whole site (OU! and OU3). To address the
data gap, BBL will perform the following field activities: 1
i) obtain ground-water elevation measurements for all of the site ground-water monitoring wells;
ii) obtain surface water elevations at locations in.the Northeast Tributary, Unnamed Tribu~ and Grants Creek;
BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.
A\519814-1BA--2/l6/i8 engineers & scientists 2-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
iii) obtain stream flow measurements from the Northeast Tributary and Unnamed Tributary at multiple locations
to estimate the flow rate discharging from ground water to the streams; and
iv) perform the annual surface-water/sediment sampling event for the Northeast Tributary to estimate a
constituent mass-flux rate.
2.1.2 Ground-Water Flow Modeling
Ground-water flow modeling will be performed subsequent to the Conceptual Model development: The ground-water
flow model will be used as a tool to: '
i) verify that the Conceptual Model is appropriate and mathematically reproducible;
ii) aid in the design of a hydraulic control ground-water extraction system;
iii) provide a hydrogeologic basis for solute-transport modeling; and
iv) aid in the appropriate location of data points for additional vertical delineation activiti~s.
Numerical ground-water flow modeling will be performed using the United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Modular Finite Difference Ground-Water Flow Model (MODFLOW, McDonald & Harbaugh, 1988). MODFLOW
will be used due to its:
i) adaptability to a wide range ofhydrogeologic conditions, including multiple stratigraphic layers;
ii) widespread use, verification, and acceptance by regulatory agencies;
iii) ability to interface with ground-water particle-tracking and solute-transport codes; and,
iv) use by the USGS to simulate aquifers in the Piedmont (Daniels, et. al., 1997).
Calibration of the numerical ground-water flow model to site specific head and flow data will be performed in
accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Guide for Comparing Ground-Water Flow
Model Simulations to Site-Specific Information (ASTM D 5490-93). '
The calibration of the numerical ground-water flow model will be investigated for its sensitivity to iilterations in major
input parameters. The input parameters (i.e., hydraulic conductivity, anisotropy, recharge, constant head boundaries)
will be changed to observe the effects on the head and flow data used for calibration. This will provide information
on the potential weaknesses of the model.
2.1.3 Solute-Transport Modeling
Solute-transport modeling will be performed using a step-wise approach. Solute-transport modeling will be
performed using analytical models incorporating data from the ground-water flow modeling (i.e,, seepage velocity
along path lines). This approach allows the project to move forward more expediently by potentially bypassing a
time-consuming numerical solute-transport modeling step. '
The use of an analytical approach is desirable because analytical solutions are less time consuming·, allowing for more
rapid estimates of source terms. One-and two-dimensional analytical solutions tend to be more conservative as they
underestimate the effects of dispersion.
2.2 Vertical Delineation Investigation
To satisfy the requirements of the ROD and UAO, a supplemental field investigation will be performed to vertically
delineate the impacts to ground-water in the bedrock. The vertical delineation will be performed by obtaining ground-
BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.
A:\51981 '4<48.A --2n6f}8 engineers & scientists 2-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
water samples from the bedrock aquifer. The locations for obtaining these samples will be chosen based on the
results of the ground-water modeling program.
The most important aspect of the ground-water modeling program in choosing the locations for vertical delineation
will be the development of the site conceptual model. The conceptual model will present an understanding of the
flow of ground water in the bedrock, as well as an understanding of the mechanisms which control the migration of
ground-water impacts. The numerical ground-water flow modeling will provide an analytical tool to evaluate the
veracity of the conceptual model and to choose optimal sampling locations for achieving vertjcal delineation.
2.2.1 Vertical Delineation Field Work
The vertical delineation field work will include the installation and sampling of at least two sampling points. The
method of installation of the sampling points will be critical to the effectiveness of the vertical d~lineation. Utmost
care will be given to limiting the potential for migration of constituents vertically through the: borehole.
I
BBL proposes the use of the Drill-and-Grout method for vertical delineation. BBL is currently using this method at
the Seaboard Chemical Corporation and Riverdale Drive Landfill Site in High Point, North Carolina to investigate
ground-water impacts in bedrock. This method of installation uses one borehole telescoped into competent bedrock.
A temporary well would be completed by:
i) advancing a 14-inch diameter hole using air rotary to competent bedrock (approximately I 00 feet to 130 feet
below ground surface (BGS);
ii) installing a 10-inch diameter casing to the top of competent bedrock;
iii) advancing a 10-inch diameter hole using air rotary to approximately 200 feet BGS (the approximate depth
of the deepest current site monitoring well);
iv) installing a 6-inch diameter casing to the bottom of the hole;
v) advancing a 6-inch diameter hole to a depth of250 feet, leaving a SO-foot open borehole;
vi) installing a packer at 200 feet BGS; and
vi) obtaining a ground-water sample from the open interval.
The sample would then be analyzed for 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), in accordance with the' FSAP and QAPP .
. If the analysis indicates that the impacts to ground water do not extend to that depth, the borehole will be sealed. If
the analysis indicates that impacts to ground water extend beyond that depth, the following activities will be
performed: '
i) the open borehole will be grouted with a cement/bentonite mixture and allowed to set;•
ii) the grouted borehole will then be re-drilled with a 6-inch diameter roller bit to the bottom of the grouted
interval;
iii) a 6-inch diameter hole would then be advanced using air rotary for an additional SO-foot 'open interval from
a depth of approximately 250 feet to 300 feet; '
iv) a packer will be installed at 250 feet BGS; and
v) a ground-water sample will be obtained.
2.3 Remedial Design
The design of the ground-water extraction and pre-treatment system for the OU3 ground-water impacts is dependent
on the results of the ground-water modeling and vertical delineation. The ground-water modeling will provide an
initial design flow rate and configuration for extraction points. The remedial design will be performed in three steps:
BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE. INC.
A\SI 98 I +18.A •• 2/2.688 engineers & scientists 2-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i) preliminary evaluation of the proposed OU3 ground-water pre-treatment system;
ii) completion of the Pre-Final Remedial Design; and
iii) finalization of the Remedial Design and initiation of the Remedial Action.
2.3.1 Preliminary Evaluation
The preliminary evaluation of the proposed OU3 ground-water pre-treatment system will be performed to assess the
flexibilities in the design. This preliminary evaluation will allow BBL and NSCC to expedite the design of the pre-
treatment system so as to have minimal impact on the overall project schedule during the compl~tion of the ground-
water modeling and vertical delineation activities. 1
The preliminary evaluation will consist of a critical engineering review of the proposed ground-~ater pre-treatment
facility. The engineering review will provide information on the process design and the flexibili):y for increasing or
decreasing the design flow rate, dependent on the results of the modeling and vertical delineation activities.
Additional detail on the scopes-of-work and schedule for the completion of the Remedial Design and Remedial
Action will be provided at the completion of the Preliminary Evaluation. The additional information will be
incorporated into this document as an addendum.
BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.
A.\51981+48A--2/1.688 engineers & scientists 2-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3. Deliverables and Schedule
This section presents the proposed deliverables and estimated schedule for completion of the R.Q/RA activities. The
latter part of the schedule concerned with the design and construction of the ground-water pre-treatment facility is
dependent on the results of the Preliminary Evaluation and Ground-Water Modeling activitie.s.
3.1 Deliverables I
The project deliverables will consist of Technical Memoranda, Plans and Reports. The technical memoranda will
be brief descriptions of on-going work for informational purposes. Work will proceed without rJgulatory comments
on the technical memoranda, however any comments provided will be addressed. The Plans and Reports will be
prepared in accordance with the descriptions provided in Appendix 3 of the UAO. !
The following technical memoranda will be prepared under this Supplemental RD/RA Work Plan:
'
i) Technical Memorandum on the Site Conceptual Model;
ii) Technical Memorandum on the Ground-Water Flow Model;
iii) Technical Memorandum on the Solute-Transport Model; and
iv) Technical Memorandum on Vertical Delineation Activities.
An addendum to this Supplemental RD/RA Work Plan will be submitted detailing the activities and schedule for
completion of the Remedial Design. I
3.2 Schedule
Figure 2 presents the revised Project Schedule. Some aspects of the work are weather depenqent. The remedial
design schedule is dependent on the results of the Preliminary Evaluation, Ground-Water Modeling and Vertical
Delineation activities.
BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.
A.\519814'48A .. 2/26/'8 engineers & scientists 3-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4. Organization and Responsibilities
On behalf ofNSCC, BBL will operate in the role of Supervising Contractor, as defined in Secti,on VIII, Paragraph
Con Page 11 of the UAO. BBL's role as Supervising Contractor on OU3 has already been approved by the US EPA
in correspondence dated February 18, 1998. The Project Organization Chart is presented in Figure 3. The roles and
responsibilities are more fully described below. I
4.1 Project Officer
' I
Joseph J. Hochreiter, Jr., CGWP will perform in the role of Project Officer for BBL. The Project Officer has ultimate
responsibility for the substance of the work product and for maintaining the project schedule.1
4.2 Project Certifying Officer
Edward R. Lynch, P.E. will perform in the role of Project Certifying Officer. The Project Certifying Officer is the
individual responsible for signing and sealing documents which require a Professional Engineer's 'ticense. Mr. Lynch
is a registered Professional Engineer in North Carolina (P.E. Number 22694). '
4.3 Senior QA/QC Modeler
Scott T. Saroff, P.G. will perform in the role of Senior QA/QC Modeler. The Senior QA/QC Modeler has
responsibility for verifying the appropriateness ofhydrogeologic assumptions and model input parameters.
4.4 Project Manager/Project Modeler
Michael P. Fleischner will perform in the roles of Project Manager and Project Modeler. The Project Manager is
responsible for the day-to-day management of the various aspects of the work. The Project Mo~eler is responsible
for performing the ground-water modeling activities. I
4.5 Project Geologist
Thomas V. Taylor, P.G. will perform in the role of Project Geologist. The Project Geologist: is responsible for
directing investigation activities and providing geologic and hydrogeologic guidance for the mo:deling effort. Mr.
Taylor is a Licensed Geologist in North Carolina (Number 1033).
4.6 Project Engineer
Donald F. Sauda will perform in the role of Project Engineer. The Project Engineer is responsible for the design of
the ground-water pre-treatment facility. '
4.7 Senior Modelers
I
Paul M. Stout, Ph.D., P.G. and Michael J. Gefell, P.G. will perform in the role of Senior Modelers. The Senior
Modelers are responsible for providing oversight on the Ground-Water Modeling activities and the design of ground-
' water extraction systems. Dr. Stout is a Licensed Geologist in North Carolina (Number 1064),
'
BIASLAND. BOUCK & LEE. INC.
A:\51981+18.A-· 2/l6fi8 engineers & scientists 4-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table I
list of Reports from Preliminary Review
'
Title Date Author '
Site Related I
' Remedial Investigation Report June 1988 IT Corporation
I Final Remedial Investigation Report for June 1993 IT Corporation
Operable Unit Three '
' Final Feasibility Study Report for Operable June 1993 IT Corporation
Unit Three !
RD/RA Field Investigations Summary Report March 1997 NSCC i
for Operable Unit Three
'
Quarterly Report: Second Quarter 1997, -. October 1997 EDM, Inc. I Operable Units No. I and 2
Quarterly Report: Third Quarter 1997, November 1997 EDM, Inc. I
Operable Units No. I and 2 I
'
Regional Hydrogeology
The Hydrogeologic Framework and a 1989 Douglas A. Harned, United States
Reconnaissance of Ground-Water Quality in Geological Surv~y
the Piedmont Province of North Carolina, with I
a Design for Future Study
Hydrogeology and Simulation of Ground-1997 Charles C. Daniel III, Dpuglas G.
Water Flow in the Thick Regolith-Fractured Smith, and Jo L. Eimers, United States
Crystalline Rock Aquifer System of Indian Geological Survey
Creek Basin, North Carolina I
Proceedings of a Conference on Ground Water 1989 Charles C. Daniel III, Rjchard K.
in the Piedmont of the Eastern United States White, Peter A Stone, eds.
Clemson University
Local Sites
'
Ploof Truck Lines Law Engineering
Piedmont Asphalt and Paving Company Stalite Environmerital
Silver Eagle Distributors Triad Environmental Consultants
Reynolds Metal Can Company ERM -Southeast
Cooper-Abex Friction Law Engineering
BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.
A:\51981 ~◄8.A •• 21.16118 engineers & scfentl,sts
~;
' .
•
/ 'i',
I SOURCES:
ROWAN MILLS, NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAP
CONTOUR INTERVAL= 10 FEET I
I
I
CHINA GROVE, NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAP
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 10 FEET
\ -'1 ' -/ \ . ):., '_y7·'-.
r ~
/
2000' 0 2oo'o·
'
4000'
SCALE IN FEET :
' . NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
' I
' SITE LOCATION MAP
RRL I I FIGURE BUSUHO, BOUCK t tr[, INC. 1 _,.__ ... ___ engineers ct scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--1
I
I
I
i]
Figure 2
ID
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
---29 --
Task Name
Ground-Water Modeling
Conceptual Model
Review of Hydrogeologic Information
Data Gap Field Woo1<
Technical Memorandum Preparation
Submission of T echnicat Memorandum
Ground-Water Flow Model
Construction
Calibration
Sensitivity Analyses
Particle Analyses
Technical Memorandum Preparation
Submission of Technical Memorandum
SolUte Tra~~POrt Mod&I
Analytical Modeling
Technical Memorandum Preparation
Submission of Technical Memorandum
Vertical·Delineatlon-lnvestigation
Vertical Investigation Meeting
Mobilization
Drilling
·-· ----· -·
Sampling and Analysis
Technical Memorandum Preparation
Submission of Technical Memorandum
Remedial Design
Preliminary Evaluation
Preliminary Evaluation
Submission of Supplemental RD/RAW011< Plan Addendum
Supplemental RD/RA Woo1< Plan
Cedar Springs Road Plant Site
Salisbury, North Carolina
Task
Progress
Page 1
I Duration I
\__ 127dl
62d
35d
10d
Start
112/98
1/2198
2123198
20d 2123198
1d 3130/98
58d
5d
20d
5d
5d
15d
1d
5d
1d
52d
1d
3123198
3/30198
4/27198
5/4/98
5111/98
618/98
5111198
5111/98
6115198
6129198
7114/98 . -
7/14198
5d 7/15198
20d 7/22198
10d 8/19/98
10d 9/2198
1d 9123198
31d
31d
20d
2/20198
2/20/98
2120/98
Jan
---4/3198 ----
Milestone
Summary
♦ •
Prcject Schedule
1998
I Feb I Mar I Apr I May I Jun I Jul
CJ]
'''.'''''''''''"'''Jri . ♦ 3/30
♦ 618
0 • ;: .
Rolled Up Task Rolled Up Progress • Rolled Up Milestone ◊
I
7114
l
Aug I Sep I
•
22}
t&Ji_
♦ 9123
Oct I Nov I Dec
I
I
Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.
Jan I Feb
2126198
-------------------
Figure 3
Organization Chart
Cedar Springs Road Plant Site
Salisbury, North Carlolina
Edward R. Lynch, P.E.
Project Certifying Officer
Thomas V. Taylor, P.G.
Project Geologist
Drilling -TBD
Surveying -Shulenberger, Inc.
Joseph J. Hochreiter, Jr., CGWP
Project Officer
~~----;;:-----.a; -----~ -~"' -' •
-. · Blas/and, Bouck.&.Lee, Inc. ,·'
~---~--" _,_ -~.' ".· ~-·~:, .. ,'_ ~ ,::_~
Michael P. Fleischner
Project Manager/Project Modeler
Staff-TBD
T -,.---,-'. / _ B/as/~f~\-~~u~~ & _Lee: tr;c::::, · .
Scott T. Saroff, P.G.
Senior QNQC Modeler
Paul M. Stout, Ph.D., P.G.
Michael J. Gefell, P.G.
Senior Modelers
Donald F. Sauda
Project Engineer
BBL
BLASI.AND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.
-----------------------------------------------engineers & scientists
1/98 EMN
cedar.ca