NCD991278540_20110201_Weyerhaeuser Company_FRBCERCLA SAP QAPP_Monitoring Report, OU-3-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------•
RMT
A
• ENVIRONMENT • ENERGY • ENGINEERING
Monitoring Report
Operable Unit No_ 3 (OU-3) -Former Chlorine Plant Area
Domtar Paper Company, LLC, Martin County, North Carolina
January 2011
Michael B. Parker, P.E.
(<,. ~-o,,__ ~' ~-=-
R. Stephen Wixo,;
Environmental Scientist Senior Client Service Manager
RW North Carolina. Inc. I Domtar Paper Company, LLC
Monitoring Report
/·\ll'/'Gl'{.'f>.fTJ\/!/Jr,25'.Q!/l/!/!llRl!0625(!9(!1!/-0(!/JJ(X:.\'
Q :'010 R.lfT, !11<'
.-l/1 Rii;ht., Re.11·n·ed
30 Patewood Drive. Suite 100 • Greenville, SC 29615-3535 • [phone] • [phone] FAX• WNW rmtinc.com
C R E A T I N G B A L A N C E'"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
'
Table of Contents
Certification .................................................................................................................................................. ii
I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ I
I . I Background .............................................................................................................................. I
1.2 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 2
2. Methods .............................................................................................................................................. 3
3. Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 Surface Cap Containment System Monitoring ........................................................................ 5
3.2 Groundwater Monitoring ......................................................................................................... 5
3.3 Recommendations .................................................................................................................... 7
List of Tables
Table I Historical Groundwater Elevations ........................................................................... I 0
Table 2 Historical Mercury Analyses of Groundwater Samples ............................................ 12
Table 3 Historical Groundwater Monitoring Field Parameters .............................................. 16
List of Figures
Figure I Sample Locations ........................................................................................................ 4
Figure 2 Water Table Surface November 16, 20 IO ................................................................... 8
Figure 3 Water Table Surface January 24, 2006 ....................................................................... 9
List of Appendices
Appendix A Analytical Data
Appendix B Field Notes
RA4T North Carolina, Inc. I Domlar Paper Company, LLC
Monitoring Report
!:I H'l'U l'L \l'JTJ I.OOt,251//V' IHI/ IR006251MJU I -110 J .DO< 'X Jmwm:v 20 I 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Certification
The hydrogeology work for the Domtar Paper Company, LLC (Domtar), Plymouth Mill in Martin
County, North Carolina, was performed by an RMT, [nc. consulting hydrogeologist in support ofRMT
North Carolina, [nc.
RMT North Carolina, Inc. I Domtar Paper Company, LLC
Monitoring Report
/: \WPG VL \P JT J \00625\09\00 !1R006150900J-0()J .DOCX
~~
RMT, Inc.
ii
January 2011
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.1 Background
Section 1
Introduction
Operable Unit No. 3 (OU-3), also referred to as the Former Chlorine Plant Area, is located at the Domtar
Paper Company, LLC (Domtar), Plymouth Mill in Martin County, North Carolina. The Record of
Decision (ROD) for this area was issued in September 2003. The negotiated Consent Decree [Civil
Action 4:03-CY-90(1-1)(3)] established remedial design (RD) and remedial action (RA) activities for this
area. The RA activities were completed during 2006, with the Pre-Final RA inspection accepted as the
Final RA inspection under United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) approval in August
2006. The Interim RA report was completed and approved by USEPA on September 29, 2006.
The Pe,jiJrmance Standards Verification Plan (PSVP)/or Former Chlorine Plant Area (RMT, 2005)
describes procedures for the inspection, monitoring, and reporting activities required for the Former
Chlorine Plant Area. The PSVP was required by the Statement of Work (SOW) for the Former Chlorine
Plant Area in response to the US EPA Consent Order Docket No. 98-10-C issued by US EPA on March 24,
1998. According to the PSYP, semiannual monitoring was to be conducted through fall 2008, followed
by annual monitoring until the first 5-year review. USEPA issued the First Five-Year Review Report in
May 20 I 0. Recommendations presented in the First Five-Year Reviell' Report included annual sampling
of wells CP-02-1, MW-I B, CP-01-2, CP-04-1, and CP-05-1. Biennial sampling would add monitoring of
wells MW-2, CP-02-2, CP-06-1, CP-07-1, CP-08-1, CP-09-1, CP-10-1, CP-13-1, and CP-14-1. The deep
wells CP-0l-3R, CP-04-3, and CP-03-3 are to be sampled once during this next five year period.
The performance monitoring activities for the Fonner Chlorine Plant Area are being conducted according
to the PSVP and the recommendations of the First Five-Year Reviell' Report (USEPA, 2010) and as such
have been divided into two technical tasks. The objective of each task is listed below:
■ Task I, Surface Cap Containment System Monitoring
A surface cap containment system reduces the infiltration of surface water in the vicinity of the
Former Chlorine Plant Arca. The objective of the surface cap containment system is to assure that
the cover system components arc maintained, including concrete, asphalt, and stormwater system
components. The surface cap containment system is inspected during groundwater monitoring
events for surface cracks, holes, depressions, or other signs of surface integrity degradation.
Construction of the surface cap containment system was completed in August 2006.
■ Task 2. Groundwater Monitoring
The objective of the groundwater monitoring program is to assess the effectiveness of the remedy to
protect groundwater quality by reducing the migration of mercury from the Fornier Chlorine Plant
Arca. Institutional controls are applied to the Former Chlorine Plant Arca in order to prevent future
use of the groundwater as a potable water source.
R1\[f Norrh Carolina, Inc. I Domtar Paper Company. LLC
Mo11irori11g Report
I·\ 11'/'G J'/. I.P.IT/\IHM25'(W .IHI/' RO(M250W!/J I.(!() I I!( !CX Ja1111w:11 20 I 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this monitoring report is to present the results of the Fonner Chlorine Plant Area surface
cap containment system inspection (Task I) and groundwater monitoring (Task 2) events conducted
November 16, 2010. This report presents surface cap inspection results, and analytical data from
groundwater sampling, pre-and post-construction water table elevations, and provides recommendations
for continued monitoring. _Water table elevations and mercury concentrations for the semiannual
sampling events (November 2006, May 2007, November 2007, May 2008 and December 2008) and the
subsequent annual monitoring events (December 2009 and November 2010) arc compared to baseline
sampling results obtained in January 2006.
RA{T North Carolina, Inc. I Domtar Paper Company, LLC
Monitoring Report
/:lll'/'(il'{,l/'Jrfl/lflfJ25',I/V11!/J/\///J/!625/JW!/!/.flfl/./)()C.\'
2
Ja1111m:1' 2011
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section 2
Methods
A baseline sampling event was conducted by RMT North Carolina, Inc. (RMT) during the week of
January 22, 2006. This sampling event served as the baseline for the short-and long-term perfonnance
monitoring of the Former Chlorine Plant Area. Remedial activities (target soil excavation, barrier wall
installation, and surface capping) took place between March and August 2006. Semiannual sampling
events were initiated in November 2006. The initial sampling event served to evaluate any immediate
changes in groundwater flow or groundwater mercury concentration levels due to the remedial
construction activities as well as a basis for evaluating remedy effectiveness. Subsequent semiannual
sampling events took place in May 2007, November 2007, May 2008 and December 2008, followed by
the annual monitoring in December 2009 and November 20 l 0. In accordance with the recommendations
presented in the First Five-Year Review Report (USEPA, 2010), a reduced number of wells were sampled
beginning with the November 2010 monitoring event. Groundwater monitoring well locations arc
depicted on Figure I.
Groundwater samples were collected using low flow purge methods in which a minimum of three well
Volumes of groundwater were removed before sample collection. Groundwater samples were analyzed by
Columbia Analytical Services in Jacksonville, Florida for mercury using USEPA Method 245.1. The
laboratory analytical data reports for November 2010 are included in Appendix A and the field notes arc
included in Appendix B. Purge water was contained, sampled, and properly discharged into the on-site
wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).
R.MT North Carolina, Inc. I Domtar Paper Company, LLC
Monitoring Report
J:IWI'Gl'/.1./'JT!'.flf!6;:_W!9'fJIIJIR//IM::50Wl()J.ooJ J>OC.\'
3
Jamtm)' 2011
I 'I
I 'I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
' I I
a
-
' I ~ I
I
IN1 -00.5171.03-001a.d n 1/12/2010 4:18:39 PM
METAL BULKHEAD/ SEA WAL
CP-IO
CP-10-1 >--
~ B ~ "-
§
I "-
~ CP-04-3
jcP-04-2
CP-04-1 CP-05-2 ij
rec,--__ CP-05-1
PRooucr,oN
F ACIL!Ty
0 CP-15-1
0 CP-07-1
MW-2 0 0 MW-2-2
0
@CP-12-1
CP-12-2
60'
SCALE: 1 "= 60'
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER EQUIPMENT
AND SUBSURFACE UTILITIES
I I EXISTING EQUIPMENT
0 MW-2-2
NOTES
BURIED CONCRETE SLABS
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION
LOCATION OF WATERLOO® BARRIER
AND SURFACE CAP
I, BASE MAP PRODUCED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC DATA SERVICES,
INC.
2. DETAILS OF MAP DETERMINED FROM FIGURE 5 OF HLA 09921,
WEYERHAEUSER 1951 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS OF THE FORMER
CHLORINE PLANT, ANO FIELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY
WEYERHAEUSER STAFF. DATA TRANSFERRED FROM FIGURE 8 OF
HLA (19921.
PROJECT: FORMER CHLORINE PLANT AREA
DOMTAR PAPER COMPANY MARTIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET TITLE: SAMPLE LOCATIONS
PROJ. NO, 5171.04 i.;D::.":::'":c.":....::."Yc:.• ___ o.c.o-1M SCALE,
CHECKED BY: TAT AS NOTED FILE NO. wto-00-51TI.03-00lo.don
APPROVED BY: OATEO PRINTEOs
120' OATE1 JANUARY 20IO
J/cad/00-5171/03/
FIGURE 1
Palewood Plaza One, Suite 100
30PatewoodDrire
GrfJ6nvilfe, S.C. 29615-3535
Phone: 864--281-(XJJ()
Fax: 864·281--0288
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section 3
Results and Discussion
This section presents the results of the surface cap and groundwater monitoring activities conducted in
November 20 I 0. Where applicable, results are compared to data from previous monitoring activities.
3.1 Surface Cap Containment System Monitoring
The surface cap containment system is inspected during each groundwater monitoring sampling event as
described in the PSVP. The surface cap containment system was inspected for surface cracks, holes,
depressions, and other signs of surface integrity degradation during the November 20 IO groundwater
monitoring event. No degradation to the cap was identified. No additional maintenance of the surface
cap containment system is recommended at this time.
3.2 Groundwater Monitoring
The water table elevations measured during the baseline sampling event in January 2006 and the
subsequent semiannual and annual monitoring events are summarized in Table I. In January 2006, prior
to installation of the Waterloo® barrier wall, there was a small ridge in the water table surface extending
from a mounded area at monitoring well CP-10-1 (western end of the Former Chlorine Plant Area) to a
second, lesser mounded area at monitoring well CP-08-1 (northeastern end of the Fom1er Chlorine Plant
Area). This ridge was still present during the November 2010 sampling event. On the northern end of
this ridge, groundwater flows northward to the Roanoke River. South of the ridge, groundwater appears
to flow south and then to the northeast towards monitoring well CP-11-1 where it ultimately discharges
into the Roanoke River. The water table is at its lowest elevation at well CP-11-1.
Since November 2006, the water level within the confines of the barrier wall (CP-06-1) have fluctuated
both above and below the water elevations measured in wells surrounding the barrier. Outside of the
barrier perimeter, the configuration of the water table in November 2010 is similar to the baseline water
table map (January 2006). Both the November 20 IO (Figure 2) and the January 2006 (Figure 3) water
table surface maps are included in this report.
Table 2 presents the mercury analytical results for groundwater samples collected from the designated
wells as outlined in the Performance Standards Verification Plan (RMT 2005) and subsequently modified
by recommendations presented in the First Five-Year Review Report (USEPA 20 I 0). Field parameters
measured include pH, specific conductance (SC), dissolved oxygen (DO), turbidity, and temperature, and
are presented in Table 3.
RA1T North Carolina, Inc. I Domrar Paper Company. LLC
Monitoring Report
/:1Jt'/'Gl'/.\f'.IT/101)(i25'09l//il!R/111625119011/-0///.0()(:X
5
January 2011
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Historically, mercury results have been below the method detection limits for most of the groundwater
samples collected. The North Carolina groundwater quality standard for mercury is 0.00 I 05 mg/L
( 15 NCAC 02L.0202, revised April 2005). Mercury concentrations detected during the baseline and
subsequent sampling events are summarized as follows:
■ Baseline Monitoring Event (January 2006)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring wells
CP-02-1, CP-04-1, CP-05-1, and CP-08-1 were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the January
2006 monitoring event.
■ Semiannual Monitoring Event (November 2006)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring
wells CP-01-2, CP-04-1, CP-05-1, and MW-18 were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the
November 2006 monitoring event.
■ Semiannual Monitoring Event (May 2007)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring wells
CP-01-2, CP-04-1, CP-05-1, CP-08-1, and MW-18 were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the
May 2007 monitoring event.
■ Semiannual Monitoring Event (November 2007)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring
wells CP-01-2, CP-01-3R, CP-04-1, CP-05-1, CP-08-1, and CP-08-3 were above the 2L Standard for
mercury in the November 2007 monitoring event
■ Semiannual Monitoring Event (May 2008)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring wells
CP-04-1, CP-05-1, CP-08-1, and MW-18 were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the May 2008
monitoring event
■ Semiannual Monitoring Event (December 2008)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring
wells CP-04-1, CP-05-1, MW-I B, and CP-01-2 were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the
December 2008 monitoring event
11 Annual Monitoring Event (December 2009)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring wells
CP-04-1, CP-05-1, MW-18, CP-08-1, and CP-01-2 were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the
December 2009 monitoring event.
■ Annual Monitoring Event (November 2010)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring wells
CP-04-1, CP-05-1, MW-IB, and CP-01-2 were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the November
20 IO monitoring event. Monitoring well CP-08-1 was not sampled in November 20 I 0.
While the concentrations in some wells remain slightly above the 2L standard for mercury, decreasing
mercury concentrations are observed in wells CP-04-1 and CP-05-1 between November 2007 and November
20 I 0. Mercury concentrations continue to fluctuate in groundwater samples from MW-I B, with detected
concentrations above the 2L standard in May 2008 through December 2009, compared to a detected
concentration slightly below the 2L standard in November 2007. Concentrations of mercury detected in
groundwater from well CP-01-2 have remained above the 2L standard since December 2008. Mercury was
not detected in groundwater sampled from well CP-02-1 in November 20 I 0, and has remained below the
2L standard since November 2006.
RMT North Carolina, Inc. I Domtar Paper Company, LLC
Monitoring Report
J: 111'1'( i f'f. ll'JTJ 1./1/1625',0'Nil! J \R0/!62509001-0// I. !JI !C \'
6
Junum:v 2011
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.3 Recommendations
US EPA completed the first five-year review of the performance monitoring and remedy effectiveness in May
2010. Based on the monitoring results collected through December 2009, USEPA recommended a reduction
in the groundwater monitoring program. Recommended revisions included annual monitoring of wells
CP-02-1, MW-I 8, CP-01-2, CP-04-1, and CP-05-1 and biennial (every two years) monitoring of wells
MW-2, CP-02-2, CP-06-1, CP-07-1, CP-08-1, CP-09-1, CP-10-1, CP-13-1, and CP-14-1. The deep wells
CP-01-3R, CP-04-3, and CP-03-3 would be sampled once between 20 IO and 2015. Groundwater level
measurements would be collected on an annual basis. Domtar agreed with USEPAs recommendations and
implemented these changes with the November 2010 monitoring event. No additional modifications are
recommended at this time.
The surface cap containment system will continue to be inspected annually for surface cracks, holes,
depressions, or other signs of surface integrity degradation.
RAIT North Carolina, Inc. I Domrar Paper Company, LLC
Monitoring Reporf
I:\ U '!'(/I'[, 1/'JTI IIJ/1615',()'NJ/J I ',ROl/6:!.Sfll/()(J J .()fl I. lJOCX
7
January 20 / I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
METAL BULKHEAD/ SEA WALL
wtg-00.5171.03-004(Nov2010).dgn 12/16/2010 12:00:38 PM
P-07-2
CP-07-1 3.42
.I>
D
\
LEGEND
0MW-2
4.25
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER
EQUIPMENT ANO SUB SURF ACE UTILITIES
EXISTING EQUIPMENT
BURIED CONCRETE SLABS
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION
WITH GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR.
DASHED WHERE INFERRED •
CONTOUR INTERVAL AS SHOWN.
LOCATION OF WATERLOO® BARRIER
AND SURFACE CAP
CP-12-1
fiJ.3.18 \
CP-12-2 • '-"
60'
SCALE, 1'0 60'
NOTES
I. BASE MAP PRODUCED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC DATA SERVICES,
INC.
2. DETAILS OF MAP DETERMINED FROM FIGURE 5 OF HLA 11992>,
WEYERHAEUSER 1951 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS OF THE FORMER
CHLORINE PLANT, ANO FIELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY
WEYERHAEUSER STAFF. DAT A TRANSFERRED FROM FIGURE 8 OF
HLA 11992).
PROJECT, FORMER CHLORINE PLANT AREA
DOMTAR PAPER COMPANY MARTIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET TITLE, WATER TABLE SURFACE
NOVEMBER 16, 2010
DRAWN 8Y1 OMC SCALE1
l-C=-1£---c-,-EO=----BY-, ---cRScc-lw AS NOTED
PROJ. NO. 00625.09
120' J'AP=PRc,O'-'.cVEe!:OC-'Be,Y.:..• ---'MB=-lP DA TEO PRINTE01
Ol TE1 DECEMBER 2010 FIGURE 2
OOCiwecr'
J/cod/00-5171/03/
Patewood Plaza One, Suite 1()()
30 PatfMIOOd Dltv6
Greenw!e, S.C. 29615-3535
Phone: [phone]
Fax: 864-281-f1288
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
METAL BULKHEAD / SEA WAU
I:\ WPGVL \ !'/Tl I 00623\09\001 \Z0062309001-00J.DOCX
®CP-15-1 3.26
~~~~.'--c:...
MW-1 ',, ,..---,
3.6 \ /'
\ > ~ I
--~ __ "!IC), ... ~ --\ \ ... ----"""" ~~=;,.;,_~";f
_, I ,, -,
" ,,
" ,, " ,
t.1 \. __ ., CP-07-2
~ CP-07-1
3.11
--
-II 5
CP-1
-2 2~ ~
2.o
2.s
-to
~
CP-12-1 J.46 CP-12-
LEGEND
r-----,
' I ,. _____ _
@MW-2-2
3.05
-3.0--
APPROXJMA TE LOCA llON OF F'ORMER
EQUIPMENT AND SUBSURFACE ununts
EXISTING EQUIPMENT
BURIED CONCRETE SLABS
GROUNDWAl[R MONITORING WELL LOCATION
CRClJNDWAlER ELEVATION {FrET NGV029)
WATER TABLE CONTOUR.
CONTOUR INTERVAL AS SHOWN.
PROJECT:
FORMER CHLORINE PLANT AREA
DOMTAR PAPER COMPANY
MARTIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHEET TITLE:
WATER TABLE SURFACE JANUARY 24, 2006
DRAWN BY: AHS SCALE· PROJ. NO. 00625.09.001
CHECKED BY: TAT FILE NO.
1-"A'-'PP'-'R'-'O'-'V~EOc..c.BY'--·----~ DATE PRINTED:
DECEMBER FIGURE 3 DATE· AUGUST
2007
AMT
2010
PATEWOOD PLAZA ONE. SUITE 100
30 PATEWOOD DRIVE
GREENVILLE, SC 29615-3535
PHONE [phone]
FAX. [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEASUR1,~G PO'i:'I.T
E_LF.VATIO.'." WELL (feet)
---. --
MW-018 8.32
CP-01-2 7.93
CP-01-3 8.22
CP-Ol-3R 8.14
CP-02-1 7.88
CP-02-2 7.85
CP-03-1 7.94
CP-03-2 8.09
CP-03-3 8.17
CP-04-1 7.50
CP-04-2 7.57
CP-04-3 7.46
CP-05-1 7.75
CP-05-2 7.73
CP-06-1 7.50
CP-06-2 7.54
CP-07-1 8.16
CP-07-2 8.11
CP-08-1 7.59
CP-08-2 7.57
CP-08-3 8.10
CP-09-1 7.48
CP-09-2 7.46
CP-10-1 7.46
CP-10-2 7.49
CP-11-1 7.62
CP-11-2 7.69
CP-12-1 8.01
CP-12-2 8.10
CP-13-1 I 1.56
CP-14-1 11.54
CP-15-1 I 1.54
MW-02 7.41
MW-02-2 7.74
"' Measured in feet.
Me:!Surcd in feet above site datum.
NM Not measured, well not accessable.
RMT .,\'orth Carolina. Inc. I Domtar Paper Company, LLC
Monitoring Report
OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
/·I U'PG J'l 'P JT/\()(16! 5109 .00 I 1.()(/6! 50900/ .{)()/ .x/srn
--
DEPTH TO GROU;,,;'DWATER DEPTH TO
WATER . ELEVATION' WATER
(feet) (feel) (feft)
01/23/06 -, ---. .. ;01/23/06 --1117.:.S/06 _·
4.70 3.62 4.54
4.73 3.20 4.62
5.74 2.48 NM
NM NM NM
5.32 2.56 4.75
4.70 3.15 3.82
4.05 3.89 4.53
4.88 3.21 5.00
5.93 2.24 5.47
4.40 3.10 3.45
4.38 3.19 4.05
3.64 3.82 3.89
4.19 3.56 4.75
4.53 3.20 4.12
4.30 3.20 NM
4.33 3.21 NM
5.05 3.11 4.94
4.90 3.21 4.95
2.76 4.83 3.00
4.34 3.23 4.44
NM NP.·t NM
5.58 1.90 4.95
4.32 3.14 4.20
1.50 5.96 1.00
4.27 3.22 3.80
6.57 1.05 6.00
4.52 3.17 4.50
4.55 3.46 4.85
4.94 3.16 5.20
8.27 3.29 7.97
8.23 3.3 I 7.92
8.28 3.26 7.80
4.60 2.81 4.80
4.25 3.49 4.40
Table I
Historical Groundwater Elevations
-GRq1J>"'DWATER GROU:\'DWATER DEPTH TO GROU1',0WATER DEPTH TO DEPTH TO GROU;'lr,'D\\'ATER
ELEVATION WATER ELEVATION WATER ELEVATION \\'ATER ~q:VATION
(feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feel)
-' , . -~05/30/07 --051fa1os
, , ..-:os11Jios · . -··:nn.-s,06• · 05/30/07 ... --11/06/07 · 1}1/06/07 --
3.78 4.45 3.87 3.74 4.58 4.35 3.97
3.31 4.68 3.25 4.79 3.14 4.50 3.43
NM NM NM NM NM NM NM
NM NM NM NM NM 5.30 2.84
3.13 5.15 2.73 5.42 2.46 4.95 2.93
-4_03 4.90 2.95 5.06 2.79 4.78 3.07
3.41 4.27 3.67 3.69 4.25 4.15 3.79
3.09 5.10 2.99 5.14 2.95 4.92 3.17
2.70 6.08 2.09 5.77 2.40 5.80 2.37
4.05 3.78 3.72 4.07 3.43 3.60 3.90
3.52 4.60 2.97 4.78 2.79 4.42 3.15
3.57 4.57 2.89 4.27 3, 19 4.35 3.11
3.00 4.49 3.26 4.65 3.10 4.26 3.49
3.61 4.77 2.96 4.88 2.85 4.54 3.19
NM 7.02 5.48 2.90 4.60 2.52 4.98
NM 2.25 5.29 3.14 4.40 2.75 4.79
3.22 5.12 3.04 5.31 2.85 4.99 3.17
3.16 5.12 2.99 5.25 2.86 4.94 3.17
4.59 2.71 4.88 2.36 5.23 2.86 4.73
3.13 4.58 2.99 4.71 2.86 4.40 3.17
NM Nrvl NM NM NM 4.17 3.93
2.53 5.06 2.42 5.92 1.56 5.20 2.28
3.26 4.55 2.91 4.98 2.48 4.41 3.05
6.46 0.93 6.53 1.95 5.51 1.09 6.37
3.69 4.48 3.01 5.02 2.47 4.35 3.14
1.62 6.4 I 1.21 6.39 1.23 6.29 1.33
3.19 4.80 2.89 4.99 2.70 4.59 3.10
3.16 5.00 3.01 5.42 2.59 4.72 3.29
2.90 5. 16 2.94 5.39 2.71 4.98 3.12
3.59 8.51 3.05 8.65 2.91 8.33 3.23
3.62 8.49 3.05 8.63 2.91 8.30 3.24
3.74 NM NM NM NM NM NM
2.61 4.71 2.70 4.77 2.64 4.59 2.82
3.34 4.49 3.25 4.67 3.07 4.25 3.49
10 January 20 I I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
R,\IT North Carolina, Inc. I Domtar Paper Compa,~v. LLC
1\lonitoring Report
OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
J-\Jl'fGl'J.'PJrJ'{)(!62.'109'(1(!/1006.'5090QJ-QOJx1'm
WELL
CP-01-2
CP-01-3
CP-01-3R
CP-02-1
CP-02-2
CP-03-1
CP-03-2
CP-03-3
CP-04-1
CP-04-2
CP-04-3
CP-05-1
CP-05-2
CP-06-1
CP-06-2
CP-07-1
CP-07-2
CP-08-1
CP-08-2
CP-08-3
CP-09-1
CP-09-2
CP-10-1
CP-10-2
CP-11-1
CP-11-2
CP-12-1
CP-12-2
CP-13-1
CP-14-1
CP-15-1
MW-02
MW-02-2
'" Measured in feet.
MEASURING PQI:,,.I
ELEVATION
DEPTH TO
'WATER
(feet) {fret)
-·· -.,._·· _ .;.....: . --_ 12/01/08 ,._
8.32 3.6
7.93 4.45
8.22 NM
8.14 5.03
7.88 5.07
7.85 4.74
7.94 2.52
8.09 4.77
8.17 5.53
7.50 3.67
7.57 4.43
7.46 4.32
7.75 4.21
7.73 4.57
7.50 2.23
7.54 2.44
8.16 4.85
8.11 4.86
7.59 2.20
7.57 4.27
8. 10 5.95
7.48 5.35
7.46 4.42
7.46 0.89
7.49 4.40
7.62 5.75
7.69 4.45
8.01 4.79
8.10 4.88
11.56 8.40
11.54 8.39
11.54 NM
7.41 3.76
7.74 4.13
Measured in feet above site datum.
N;-..t Not measured, well not accessab!e.
Table I
Historical Groundwater Elevations
GROUNDWATER
ELEVATIOl\'
(feet)
" , 12/oi,os
4.72
3.48
NM
3.11
2.81
3.11
5.42
3.32
2.64
3.83
3.14
3.14
3.54
3.16
5.27
5.10
3.31
3.25
5.39
3.30
2.15
2.13
3.04
6.57
3.09
1.87
3.24
3.22
3.22
3.16
3.15
NM
3.65
3.61
-
11
DEPTH TO
WATER
GROU1"DWATER
ELEVATION
(feet)
"1.,Ji/01/09 r •: •,-•
(fret)
12(01/09
3.67 4.65
4.05 3.88
NM NM
4.44 3.70
4.91 ?.97
4.29 3.56
2.73 5.21
4.53 3.56
5.17 3.00
3.37 4.13
4.00 3.57
3.94 3.52
3.89 3.86
4.14 3.59
2.60 4.90
2.32 5.22
4.51 3.65
4.52 3.59
2.50 5.09
3.96 3.61
4.20 3.90
5.22 2.26
3.89 3.57
0.85 6.61
3.81 3.68
5.55 2.07
4.20 3.49
4.54 3.47
4.63 3.4 7
7.9? 3.64
7.90 3.64
NM NM
4.02 3.39
3.88 3.86
DEPTH TO
WATER
i"t/16110 -s
3.65
4.27
NM
4.62
4.82
4.48
2.19
4.40
4.90
3.28
4.22
4.25
4.17
4.46
2.58
2.74
4.74
4.64
2.05
4.19
3.76
5.20
4.32
0.36
4.36
5.68
4.45
4.83
4.81
8.10
8.21
NM
3.16
4.14
GROUi'i'DWATER
.ELEVA TIO;-;
(feet)
--~· ~---1·1,f6iiO
4.67
3.66
NM
3.52
3.06
3.37
5.75
3.69
3.27
4.22
3.35
3.21
3.58
3.27
4.92
4.80
3.42
3.47
5.54
3.38
4.34
2.28
3.14
7.10
3.13
1.94
3.24
3.18
3.29
3.46
3.33
NM
4.25
3.60
January 20/ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 2
Historical Mercury Analyses of Groundwater Samples
WELL
-m. ---
Allu\'ial aquifer (water fable)
MW-OIB
Cl'-02-1
CP-03-1
Cl'-04-1
Cl'-05-1
Cl'-07-1
CP-08-1
RMT North Carolina. Inc. I Domtar Paper Company, LLC
Monitoring Report
OU-3 -Former Ch/ori11,: Pia!// Area
I 111 /'UJ'l'l'JI J,Oflf>!J'l/~,11/!I lll!ll:-Jf/W/11/-f){J/,<l,m
----SAMPLE
J)ATE. -· --
01/24/06
1 !/07/06
05/30/07
I 1/07/07
05/l 3/08 -
12/05/08
12/01/09 ,_
) 1/16/10
01/25/06
1 l/08/06
05/31/07
I 1/08/07
05/13/08
I 2/05/08
12/02/09
11/16/l0
0!/24/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
0 I /25/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
11/08/07 -
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
11/16/10
0 I /25/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08 -
12/02/09
l 1 /16/10
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/03/99
11 /08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
11 /08/07
05/13/08
! 2/05/08
12/01/09
12
~1n1·c-uR,~u
(mg/L) . -
0.001
·,.-; 0.0027 . .
-0JJ0IS"
0.001
-0,0012 --0.0015
.. -' .IJ.110206
0.00113 i .
0.0012
0.0005
<0.0002
0,0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
0.00011 .I
<0.0002 U
<0,0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U -.. 0:068)"'"•·; ..
,.;,• 0.084 ·
.,_, O,OOH9 -'·
"'-~ 0.014..: --
. 0.0089.
0.0078
. 0.00114 -
"0.00339
' -0.0!01 • C
--0.027 . _,-
" 0.0137. -.-•· -0.069i··: .. ;._--
:·:-0.024· --
. ::...··. 0:0079;,-
·. ·i · OJJ0757 ·
11.0107
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
0.0014
0.0004
-·o.001s -_
-11.11012
0.0014. --
0.0007
. ·-0.00152 --
.
-
.
-
January 201 I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 2
Historical Mercury Analyses ofCroundwatcr Samples
WELL
II) .
CP-09-1
CP-10-1
CP-11-1
CP-12-1
CP-13-1
CP-14-1
Cl'-15-1
MW-02
Allu\'ial auuifcr (-20 ft elevation)
CP-01-2
R,\rr North Carolina. Inc. I Domrar Paper Compw~v. LLC
Monitoring Report
OU-3 -Forma Chlorine Plant Area
I Ill'/'( ,'I "/.',/'.I// '(ll!f,2,1',/JV,/lrl /'IHM!5/N(!/)/ ./HJ/,''""
SA;\ll'LE
•DATE .
01/24/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
I !/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
01/24/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
01/24/06
I 1/07/06
05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
0 l/24/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
01/25/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
01 /25/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
01/25/06
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
0 I /24/06
11/07/06
05/30107
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09 . .
11/l 6/1 0 -
13
. . ~IERCU!'i\~n·
(m!,!/L)
0.0007
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
0.00011 J
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
<0,0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
0.0001 J
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0,0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
11.0000H J
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
0.0056
0.0038
.(l.0011
<0.0005
0.0022
fl.0015 .. .. .. 0.00973. ;
....
.
'>
Junuary 2011
I
I.
I
I
I ·.·
I
I
I
I
I
Table 2
Historical Mercury Analyses of Groundwater Samples
--WE!,1;
-. . m
CP-02-2
CP-03-2
CP-04-2
CP-05-2
CJ>-07-2
Cl'-08-2
CP-09-2
Cl'-10-2
RMT North Carolina. Inc. I Domtar Paper Compa1t1·. I.LC
Monitoring Re1xm
OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
1111'/'Gl"l'PJTI (I{)(,~, /Wt/(// 001,J,IMK!l•/~ll..t/,,.
----
' :' SAMl'LE
-DATE,.
01125106
11108/06
05/31107
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
01 /24/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
11/07/07
05113/08
12/05/08
12/0!/09
01 /25/06
11 /08/06
05/31/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
01/25/06
l 1/08/06
05/31/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
01/25/06
I 1/07/06
05/30/07
l l/0R/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
11108/07
05/IJ/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
01/24/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
I l/08/07
05113/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
01/24/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
1 1/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
14
.. !\IJ:RcUR\"11 ·-.~
(inL!/L).
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
0.00009 J
<0.0002
0,0004
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
0.0006
<0.0002
<0,0002
0.0007
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0,0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
0.00018.1
0.0002
0.0003
0.0002
0.0003
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
0.011008 .I
<0.0002
0,0006
0.0007
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
0.00065
<0.0002
<0.0002
0.0002
<0.000)
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
0.0004
<0.0002
0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
. .
Januarr 201 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
Table 2
llistorical Mercury Analyses of Groundwater Samples
wr.p: SAMPJ.E -
-II) -DAfF. -
0I/24/06
11/07/06
05130107
CP-11-2 11/07107
05113108
12/05/08
12/0l/09
01124106
11/07/06
05/30/07
CP-l 2-2 11107/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12101109
01/25/06
11/07106
05/30107
MW-02-2 11/07107
05/13/08
l 2/05/08
12/01/09
M:1rinc sand
CP-01-3 01/24/06
I 1/14/07
CP-0l-3R 05/13/08
12105/08
12/01/09
01/24/06
11/07106
05/30107
CP-03-3 I 1/07/07
05/13/08
12105108
12/01/09
01125106
11/08/06
05/31/07
CP-04-3 11/08/07
05113108
12/05/08
12/02/09
11/14/07
CP-08-3 05/18/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
111 Shaded values indicate an cxcccdcnce of the North Carolina groundwater 41,ality standard of
0.00105 mg.IL (15A NCAC 2Ul202).
1'' Well samples CP.04-1 and CP-04-3 were mi,lahclcd during sampling: the sample labeled CP-04-1
in the field and in the laborator)' report was actuall>· CP-04-3 and 1·iec versa.
fatimated <MRI..> MDL
Concentration considered an estimate based on d.na validation.
< Concentration lc~s than the ()u::mtitation Limit.
~1F.Rc9in~w
(mg/L)..
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
0,01104
0.0002
11.0002
0,0003
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
(1.()0008 J
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0,0005 U
<0.0005 U
11,0002
0.0023
<0.0005
<(l.0005 U
<0,0005 U
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
0.00071
<0.0005 U
<ll nr,rq(2)
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
0.0021
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0005 U
lJ ['be cornpound was analy~cd for. but wa~ not dctcclcd at or ahme the Mc1l1<>d reporting limit (:i.1RI.)
RMT Norrh Carolina, Inc. I Domtar Paper Compw~1•. U.C
,\1onitoring Report
OU-3 -F,wmer Chlorine /'/a111 An.'u
I 11!'/'/; 1·1 '!'JI / ,/!(/(>.'''/!V,INI/ ·m,~::.,11vrm1, /NJ/, ,I.to, 15
-
-----
'
Jom1m:\' 20 JI
I
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
Table 3
Historical Groundwater Monitoring Field Parameters
.. -..
WELL SAMPLE
DATE . ---
Alhn·ial :u111ifcr (waler table)
0 !/24/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
MW-OIB 11/07/07
05/14/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
11/16/10
01/25/06
11/08/06
11/08/07
CP-02-1 05/31/07
05/14/08
! 2/05/08
12/02/09
11/16/10
01/24/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
CP-03-1 11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
0l/25/06
I !/08/06
05/31/07
CP-04-1 11/08/07
05/14/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
11/16/10
01/25/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
CP-05-1 11/08/07
05/14/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
11/16/10
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
Cl'-07-1 11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
Cl'-08-1 11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
RMT 1Vonh Carolino, Inc. I Domtar Paper· Company, U.C
Monitorin~ Report
OU-3 -Ful"lner Chlori11e Plant Area
/ IWPGl1'1'JTI f/06:!j Oil 00/ (l()r,]j09(}(//.00l.,l,m
iHSSOL\'i~ll . -.
()XYGE:', pll
(mg/L) .. c~u)
7.82 7.29
0.00 7.12
2.68 7.09
0.14 7.26
0.12 7.35
0.21 7.45
0.43 7.42
0.21 7.36
5.10 6.92
0.10 6.30
0.31 6.83
2.56 6.36
0.67 6.92
0.79 6.77
0.29 7.05
0.40 7.05
9.90 7.52
0.00 6.69
2.99 6.82
0.24 7.28
0.89 7.35
2.9 6.77
1.09 7.42
7.63 7.09
1.)8 7.80
4.06 6.68
1.20 8.65
3.7 8.01
3.98 7.44
1.47 7.82
4.23 7.75
5.45 8.78
0.13 9.50
2.69 8.71
0.39 9.79
0.26 9.72
0.55 9.23
0.29 9.06
0.63 8.91
3.13 7.43
0.00 7.16
3.18 7.17
0.34 7.58
0.37 7.72
0.51 7.74
1.2 7.58
8.79 9.22
5.26 8.56
6.59 8.61
4.45 9.33
4.46 9.05
3.6 7.84
1.76 9.08
16
' SJ>EciF.-C . -
coiDUCT1''1TY TE~1P~:,urnRi-:
(µSiem)· -. tq
644 16.4
744 22.0
519 20,88
561 23.47
636 19.83
586 20.23
406 20.64
527 22.35
786 22.1
900 21.8
908 22.91
97 20.1 l
854 19.63
786 20.21
644 20.97
745 23.27
321 12.4
810 20.2
298 ! 9.24
600 21.6
561 17.34
570 14.46
510 16.4
1257 22.1
!490 21.1
1790 21.19
1355 22.31
1501 20.89
1265 17.87
1045 19.86
1159 21.88
I 033 22.1
1570 20.5
1100 21.81
425 21.09
619 20.76
727 16.57
0.357 18.17
605 19.91
980 22.1
1390 23.5
1360 21.04
1306 23.68
1182 20.56
1035 20.73
1220 21.24
392 21.4
900 22.2
601 25.7
459 19.51
638 21.89
263 21.07
480 19.81
·' ....
TURUIDITY
(l\"ll/J
I.I
2.1
0.78
0.67
1.17
l.96
2.49
1.58
45.5
11.0
5.17
5.44
4.23
5.40
2.43
2.32
7.7
3.2
1.96
0.59
2.03
2.77
1.43
11.0
41.2
5.18
5.16
25.2
10.5
3.78
4.30
31.9
54.1
46.1
192
138
83.9
63.8
64.6
1.6
6.7
!.32
17.9
4.8
1.48
1.74
17.0
60.l
14.8
8.76
4.6
7.25
9.7
Jamiury 20/ I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
Table 3
Historical Groundwater Monitoring Field Parameters
---
WELL S,\Ml'LE
DATE ,_ --
01/24/06
11/08/06
05131107
CP-09-1 11/08/07
05/14/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
01/24/06
11/08/06
05131107
CP-10-1 I 1/08/07
05/14/08
12105/08
12/02/09
01/24/06
11/07106
05130107
Cl'-11-1 11107107
05/13/08
12105108
12/01/09
01/24/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
CP-12-1 11/07/07
05113108
12/05/08
12/01/09
01125106
11/08/06
05/31 /07
CP-13-1 11/08/07
05114108
12/05/08
12/02/09
Alhn·ial anuifcr (water table)
01/25/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
Cl'-14-1 11/08/07
05/14/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
CP-15-1 01/25/06
01/25/06
11/07/06
05130107
MW-02 11107107
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
R,\fT North Corolina, foe. I Domtar Paper Company. LLC
Monilori11K Report
OU-3 -Former Chf,wi11<: /'Ian/ Area
/',ll"f'(il"/.'/'./7/l!(J(,Jjf/9,//0/'/N!/,}.'IMl/!/.()/!/,r/,,m
IHSSOL\;Ell
OXYGE:'I: pll
._ (m~L), hu)
7.34 6.94
0.15 6.34
3.38 6.35
0.28 6.92
0.68 7.05
0.88 6.55
0.63 6.71
6.20 6.98
3.49 6.74
3.3 6.55
0.77 7.27
0.91 7.65
1.59 7.3
0.85 7.56
6.87 6.79
0.00 6.05
2.99 5.84
0.34 6.34
0.91 6.37
0.57 6.37
0.68 6.49
5.33 6.72
0.00 6.32
3.11 6.20
0.3 6.50
0.52 6.60
0.49 5.71
0.63 7.08
6.02 7.15
0.18 6.90
2.74 6.59
0.29 7.21
0.4 7.29
0.5 7.2
0.58 7.54
5.18 6.80
0.13 6.76
2.44 6.38
0.36 6.81
0.96 6.84
0.82 6.74
1.95 7.12
6.0 6.33
5.00 6.22
3.05 6.12
6.84 5.91
1.58 6.23
4.30 6.66
4.10 6.42
4.66 6.56
17
.-SPECIFIC ,
co:.:uucnvrrv TEMl'F.RATl/!(E
. (/JS/cm)~-("q . -"'
905 20.1
960 22.6
661 20.8
889 22.88
845 18.77
910 21.11
831 21.01
694 20.1
940 21.7
714 22.28
834 21. l
284 2!.!4
606 20.! I
706 19.7
422 16.9
568 23.1
466 19.77
571 24.35
549 17.98
631 20.94
533 20.99
607 17.5
900 21.9
671 20.84
664 23.02
727 19.29
676 2!.16
869 20.3
897 2!.9
900 23.0
685 22.81
580 24.07
723 22.9
562 23.6
616 23.8
1196 21.6
1440 23.0
1300 21.14
1178 24.18
1153 21.4
1021 23.1
812 23.26
374 21.8
432 22.1
900 21.0
599 20.81
502 22.21
735 20.16
569 18.42
603 18.53
TlJRRHllTY
(NTU) __
3.1
3.6
0.64
0.42
2.32
2.92
1.02
1.9
0.6
1.49
0.99
9.75
2.88
1.71
2.6
1.7
1.86
8.08
5.89
3.51
0.78
19.7
8.0
2.82
5.28
4.09
9.95
1.47
22.8
13.9
2.62
3_7
22.2
6.4
6.05
144.0
18.3
10.4
21.9
40.5
17.8
22.1
36.9
3.7
NM
3.1
2.27
13.3
1.22
2.69
Jam1wy201 I
I
I
,I
.I
I
I
I
' . ·1·
I·
I
Table 3
Historical Groundwater Monitoring Field Parameters
. . .. .. , .. ·-
sAMri.E WEL.L ::DA'i·f: ... ' ' ----· -----.. ..
Allm·ial :1"uifcr -20 ft elevation\
01124106
11107/06
05/30/07
CP-01-2 I !/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
11/16/10
01/25/06
11/08/06
05131107
Cl'-02-2 l 1/08/07
05/14/08
12105108
12102/09
01124106
11/07/06
05/30107
CP-03-2 11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
01/25/06
11108106
05/31/07
CP-04-2 11108107
05114108
12/05/08
12102109
01125/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
Cl'-05-2 11108/07
05114108
12105/08
12102109
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/30/07 .
Cl'-07-2 11 /08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
01/25/06
11107106
05130107
CP-08-2 11108107
05113108
12/05/08
12/01/09
01124106
11/08/06
05131107
CP-09-2 11108107
05114108
12/05/08
12/02109
RMT North Carolina, Inc. I Dumlar Paper Company. LLC
Moniroring Report
OU-3 -Furma Ch/urine Plan/ Area
I 1.11 /'/;l"l,'./',f/ I (1//6:!5./N (l/1/'(!0f,].\OY/l(}/.(!/l/.rl.rn,
1i1sSOL\;J<:1>" •,': ,OXYGEN
.. ~ (rnl:iL) __ , -·
5.37
0.00
2.64
0.14
0.3
0.32
0.19
0.21
7.11
0.00
2.61
0.17
0.53
0.45
0.18
7.25
0.00
2.79
0.18
0.68
0.71
0.48
4.31
0.00
2.6
0.2
0.6
0.56
0.64
5.65
0.00
2.5
0.18
0.28
0.5
0.37
4.20
0.00
2.66
0.13
0.25
0.26
0.57
5.14
0.00
2.81
0.14
0.32
0.34
0.4
7.23
0.00
3.02
0.2
0.69
0.38
0.29
.,-.,_ Sl'EC!J<IC .. ._ -··-.. . -,--
'. ~rill·.· , ~··coNriY~T1,:1TY ' TEJ\.11;E~,\T!JRE
..,(~u) : /. ·. _(µstem) ' ("C)°. . . '
7.01 633 19.5
6.98 840 19.9
6.76 511 19.84
7.26 552 20.2
7.19 566 20.11
7.15 536 20.15
7.32 330 19.9
7.42 446 20.92
6.17 2735 22.1
6.10 2470 19.7
6.16 1780 19.47
6.65 1114 19.91
6.71 1061 19.97
6.62 631 19.56
6.93 479 19.67
7.03 843 17.8
6.87 900 19.7
6.37 688 18.59
6.87 625 20.01
6.83 873 18.29
7.06 725 I 9.47
7.02 562 18.9
5.83 2339 22.1
6.09 1480 21.0
5.65 1290 20.33
5.99 1284 21.02
6.03 1397 20.70
5.95 1423 20.77
6.2 l 116 21.04
6.24 1406 22.1
6.69 910 21.0
6.04 874 20.48
6.72 810 21.14
6.8 966 20.8
6.66 840 20.94
6.88 685 21.04
6.61 934 22.1
6.82 900 21.8
6.62 1000 21
6.98 658 22.03
6.86 837 2!.3
7.13 503 21.98
7.26 279 21.55
6.80 420 21.4
7.45 537 21.8
6.93 425 20.94
7.17 542 22.17
7.26 542 20.99
7.34 456 23.02
7.54 279 22.1
6.27 239 20.1
6.06 242 20.4
5.92 2370 19.35
6.37 1987 20.66
6.43 1786 19.19
6.39 1540 20.18
6.79 869 20.08
18
.. ' ,,
: •··Tu1imOrr'v · ..
. :·' .. (NTli) ' ''
I.I
1.4
0.4
0.51
0.57
1.56
0.82
1.28
12.0
8.1
0.64
0.48
0.94
2.75
0.58
1 LO
45.3
8.52
4.26
2.38
2.76
1.67
4.1
2.2
0.28
2.46
0.61
1.72
0.43
38.3
2.0
0.57
0.55
1.01
1.23
l.53
16.6
4.7
0.63
0.36
0.7
1.05
0.69
12.5
3.2
0.44
0.28
0.77
0.92
4.03
23.7
2.4
0.42
0.46
0.79
1.61
0.93
Januwy 2011
I
I ,;
I
,,,
I ....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3
Historical Groundwater Monitoring Field Parameters
WEI.L SA:'>IPLE
. DATE
01/24/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
CP-10-2 11/08/07
05/\4/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
Alluvial iwnifcr (-20 ft elcrntion)
01/24/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
Cl'-11-2 11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
01/24/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
Cl'-12-2 11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
MW-02-2 11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
Marine s:md
Cl'-Ol<l 01/24/06
11/14/07
CP-01-3R 05/14/08
12/05/08
l 2/02/09
01/24/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
CP-03-3 11/07/07
05/13/08
l 2/05/08
12/01/09
01/25/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
CP-04-3 11/08/07
05/14/08
12/05/08
12/02/09
11/14/07
CP-08-3 05/13/08
12/05/08
12/01/09
R.\lT Nvnh Caroli,w. Inc. I Dom/11r Paper Company. !.LC
Monitoring Report
OU-3 -Former Chlori11c Plant Arca
/ l!l'l'<.i!'/.'PJTI /l06!J t!'JOO//l06!J119()(1/.()()/ xl,m
ll1sso1.,·rn
OXYGE:"i
(mjefL)
7.02
0.00
2.49
0.21
0.52
0.43
0.24
6.39
0.00
2.94
0.23
0.37
0,29
0.46
6.02
0.00
2.85
0.19
0.28
0.3
0.5
4.66
0.00
2.74
0.27
0.59
0.2
0.51
4.94
1.03
0.09
0.25
0.22
6.51
0.00
2.89
0.45
0.56
0.88
0.47
5.02
0.00
2.36
0.14
0.19
0.37
0.94
0.18
0.08
0.3
0.27
., .
Sl'f.CIFIC
pll CO:"ilHJCl'l\'IT\' TEMPERATURE
(~u) (µSiem). . --<"CJ
6,)9 1851 20.\
6.04 1620 21.6
5.83 1500 21.04
6.21 1310 21.61
6.25 1146 20.56
6.14 ! 165 21.05
6.4 915 20.84
7.42 91 ! 18.9
7.31 90 20.9
6.82 TJ7 18.7
7.38 772 21.51
7.49 769 ! 8.43
7.6! 740 20.92
7.53 733 20.52
7.15 949 20.5
7.00 900 21.7
6.79 713 20.92
7.38 553 22.12
7.49 516 20.92
7.17 463 22.03
7.28 435 21.57
7.25 412 22.1
6.95 614 20.8
6.58 413 20,84
7.41 488 21.43
7.48 539 20.48
7.54 565 20.77
7.46 467 20.03
7.05 1480 18.7
6.98 13920 21.47
7.03 153 !0 19.49
6.93 12830 18.82
7.18 !0220 19.14
7.00 1402 18.1
7.13 1390 18.9
6.77 15600 19.17
6.93 13940 !9.27
6.91 !4230 18.98
7.11 13020 18.82
7.01 11680 I 8.37
6.95 2299 22.1
7.08 765 20.7
6.52 13100 21.12
6.80 14710 20.64
6.91 15520 21.05
6.76 14200 20.35
7 1225 20.46
7.49 40650 23.31
7.04 5492 21.23
7.07 6732 21.21
6.94 8465 20.53
19
TUIUllDITY
(:-.TU)
17.4
1.2
0.75
0.27
1.04
1.72
1.44
4.9
2.3
1.28
0.61
0.87
1.28
0.44
7.3
9.5
OJ
0.58
I.OS
1.13
0.3
3.0
0.3
0.31
0.29
0.62
0.64
0.77
4.4
8.2
0.74
1.98
0.78
9.0
55.0
6
0.92
4.65
8.19
8.51
23.0
1.9
3.66
!.43
1.03
3.01
0.51
12.9
0.54
1.14
0.59
Ja1111w:1• 201 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• •
I
I
I
D
I
0
I
I
RMT North Carolina, Inc. I Domtar !'aper Company, LLC
Monitoring Report A-1
/:IJ!'/'GJ'L\l'JTI\/I06J510l/'/!/!liR/!06J5(!(}001-001.NJC.\'
Appendix A
Analytical Data
Janum;v 201 J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/;( Columbia (£:"')) Analytical Services'"' 9143 Philips Highway, Suite 200 I Jacksonville, FL 32256 I 9D4-739-2277 I 904-739-2011 fax [ www.caslab.com
........ -.... -..... -....... -..... -. " -.... --.... -. - - -.. - -... --.. -............. -.... --... -... -. -.. ---.. -.. -...... - -. -.
November 24. 2010
tvlike Parker
RMT Inc.
30 Patcwood Drive
Suite 100 Patewood Plaza One
Greenville, SC 29615-3535
Laboratory Results for: Domtar Plymouth/00625.09.001
Dear Mike:
Service Request No: Jl0056l8
Enclosed are the results of the sample(s) submitted to our laboratory on November 19, 20 I 0. For
your reference, these analyses have been assigned our service request number Jl0056!8.
All analyses were performed according to our laboratory's quality assurance program. The test
results meet requirements of the NELAP standards except as noted in the case narrative report.
All results arc intended to be considered in their entirety, and Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
(CAS) is not responsible for use ofless than the complete report. Results apply only to the items
submit!cd to the laboratory for analysis and individual items (samples) analyzed, as listed in the
report.
Please contact me if you have any questions. My extension is 4408. You may also contact me
via email at [e-mail].
Respectfully submitted.
Columbia Analytical Sc,·viccs, Inc.
Tom Kissinger
Proj cct Manager
Page I of_-'-/~/ __
CAS .!acksonvi/!e is NE/AC-accredited by the Swte of Florida, #£82502. Other stale accreditations
include: Georgia, #958: Kenlucky, #63: Louisiana, #02086; Noni, Carolina, #527: South Carolina,
1/9602100/: Texas, #TJ0-/70-1197-09-TX.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/;.{ Columbia
~~ Analytical Services· 9143 Phillps Highway, Suite 200 I Jacksonville, Fl 322561004-739-2277 I 9o.1-739-2011 fax I www.caslab.com
···························---·-·························-···························-············-·················
November 24,2010 Service Request No: JI005618
Mike Parker
RMT!nc.
30 Patewood Drive
Suite 100 Patewood Plaza One
Greenville, SC 29615-3535
Laboratory Results for: Domtar Plymouth/00625.09.001
Dear Mike:
Enclosed are the results of the sample(s) submitted to our laboratory on November 19, 2010. For
your reference, these analyses have been assigned our service request number J1005618.
All analyses were performed according to our laboratory's quality assurance program. The test
results meet requirements of the NELAP standards except as noted in the case narrative report.
All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
(CAS) is not responsible for use ofless than the complete report. Results apply only to the items
submitted to the laboratory for analysis and individual items (samples) analyzed, as listed in the
report.
Please contact me if you have any questions. My extension is 4408. You may also contact me
via email at [e-mail].
Respectfully submitted,
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
Tom Kissinger
Project Manager
-
jCM
GAS .Jacksonville is NELAC-accredited by the State of Florida, #E82502. Other state accreditations
include: Georgia, #958; Kentucky, #63; Louisiana, #02086; North Carolina, #527; South Carolina,
#96021001; Texas, #TJ04704197-09-TX
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
RMT Inc.
Domtar Plymouth
water
Service Request No.:
Date Received:
CASE NARRATIVE
11005618
11/19/10
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
(CAS). This repmi contains analytical results for samples designated for Tier II data deliverables, including results of
QC samples analyzt:d from this delivery group. When appropriate to the procedure, method blank results have been
reported with each analytical test. Analytical procedures performed by the lab arc validated in accordance with
NELAC standards. Parameters that arc included in the NELAC Fields of Testing but arc not included in the lab's
NELAC accreditation are identified in the discussion of each analytical procedure.
Sample Receipt
Seven water samples were received for analysis at Columbia Analytical Services on 11/l 9/l 0. The samples were
received in good condition and consistent with the accompanying chain of custody form. Samples are refrigerated at
4±2°C upon receipt at the lab except for aqueous samples designated for metals analyses, which were stored at room
temperature.
Mercury bv CV AA
Batch QC Notes and Discussion
Quality control samples (i.e., Dup/Spike or tv1S/Drv1S samples) were performed using smnples from another sample
delivery group (SDG). The frequency requirement for quality control sample analysis was consistent with the
project's requirements. Therefore, control of the batch has been evaluated using the method blank and the
laborato1y control sample.
J)ate // /z1/;~
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
Data Qualifiers
Inorganic Data
* The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. Sec case narrative.
B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result.
lo The result is an estimated amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range.
J The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but gri.:atcr than or equal to the MDL.
U The compound was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non.detect") at or 11bovc the MRL/MDL.
Z Too many colonies were present (TNTC). The numeric value represents the filtration volume.
The MRL/MDL has been elevated clue to nwtrix interference.
X See case narrative.
Metals Data • The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. Sec case narrative.
J The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL.
E The reported value is estimated because of the presence of matrix interference.
M The duplicate injection precision was not met.
N The Matrix Spike sample recovery is nol within control limits. Sec case narrative.
S The result was determined by Method of Standard Additions (MSA).
U The compound was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non-detect") at or above the MRL/rv1DL.
W The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits, while sample absorbance is less than
50% of spike absorbance.
The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to matrix interference.
X Sec case narrative.
+ The correlation coetlicient for the MSA is less than 0.995.
Organic Data
* The result is an outlier. Sec case narrative.
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. See case narrative.
A The tentatively identified compound is a suspected a Idol-condensation product.
B The ana!yte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result.
C The analyte was qualitatively confirmed using GC/MS techniques, pattern recognition, or by comparing to
historical data.
D The reported result is from a dilution.
E The result is an estimated amount because the value exceeded the instnnnent calibration range.
J The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL.
N The result is presumptive. The analyte was tentatively identified, but a confirmation analysis was not
performed.
P The GC or HPLC confirmation criteria were exceeded. The relmive percent difference is greater than 4011/ci
between the two analytical results (25% for CLP Pesticides)
U The compound was analyzed for, but was not detected C'Non~detect") at or above the MRL/MDL.
The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to a chromatographic interference.
X Sec case narrative.
Petroleum Hydrocarbon Specific
F The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample matches the elution pattern of the calibration standard.
L The chromatographic !ingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates
the presence ofa greater amount of lighter molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
H The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates
the presence ofa greater amount of heavier molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
0 The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles an oil, but does not match the calibration standard.
Y The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product eluting in approximately the
correct carbon range, but the elution pattern does not match the calibration standard.
Z The chromatographic fingerprint does not resemble a petroleum product.
3
I
I
I ASTM
/\2L/\
I CARI3
CAS Number
I CFC
CFU
DEC
I DEQ
OHS
DOE
I DOH
EPA
I ELAP
GC
GC/MS
I LUFT
M
MCL
I MDL
I MPN
MRL
NA
I NC
NCASI
ND
I NIOS!-1
PQL
I RCRA
SIM
TP!-1
I tr
I
I
I
I
Acronyms
American Society for Testing and Materials
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
California Air Resources Board
Chemical Abstract Service rcgist1y Number
Ch lorof1uorocarbon
Co\ony•Fom1ing Unit
Depa,tment of Environmental Conservation
Depaiimcnt of Environmental Quality
Department ofl·lca\th Services
Department of Ecology
Department of Health
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Gas Chromatography
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Leaking Underground Fuel Tank
Modified
tvtaximum Contaminant Level is the highest pennissible concentration of a substance allowed in
drinking water as established by the USE PA.
Method Detection Limit
Most Probable Number
Method Reporting Limit
Not Applicable
Not Calculated
National Council of the Paper lndustI)' for Air and Stream Improvement
Not Detected
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Practical Quarllitation Limit
Resource Conservation and Recovcty Act
Selected Ion Monitoring
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Trace level is the concentration of an analyte that is less than the PQL but greater than or equal to the
MDL.
4
I
Client: R'v!T Inc. I Project: Domtar Plymouth/00625.09.001
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SAMPLE#
JI 005618-00 I
.11005618-002
JI 005618-003
.I I 0056 I 8-004
.110056 I 8-005
.11 005618-006
J I 00561 8-007
ll'rintcd l l/24/10 7:20
SAMPLE CROSS-REFERENCE
CLIENT SAMPLE ID
MW-1B
CP-01-2
CP-02-1
Cl'-04-1
CP-05-1
FIJLK-10401
DU-10401
Sample Summary
Service Request: 11005618
DATE TIME
11/16/10 10:10
11/16/10 10:30
11/16/10 10:50
11/16110 11 :20
11/16110 11 :50
I 1/16/10 12:00
11/16110 00:00
5
Page I of I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Prep Method:
Analysis Method:
Sample Name
MW-113
CP-01-2
CP-02-1
CP-04-1
CP-05-1
FBLK-10401
DU-10401
Method Blank
CO LUM BIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Analytical Report
Domtar Industries
Domtar Plymouth/00625.09.001
Water
Method
245.1
Mercury, Total
Lah Code Result Q MRL
.11005618-001 1.13 0.20
.11005618-002 9.73 0.20
JI 0056 l 8-003 ND u 0.20
JJ005618-004 3.39 0.20
JJ005618-005 10.7 0.40
Jl005618-006 ND u 0.20
Jl005618-007 I.SO 0.20
.11005618-MB ND u 0.20
Printed 11/23110 14:46
\llnflow2\Starlims\limsReps\Ana!ytica1Report.rpt
Fonn 1A
Service Request: .I 10056 I 8
Date Collected: 11/16/10
Date Received: 11/19/10
Units: _ug/L
Basis: NA
Dilution Date Date
Factor Extracted Analyzed
11/22/10 11/22/10 16:42
11/22/10 l l /22/10 l 6:46
11/22/10 11/22/10 16:48
1 11/22/10 11/22/10 16:49
2 11/22/10 11/22/10 17:22
l 1/22/10 11/22/10 16:53
11/22/10 11/22/10 16:54
11/22/10 11/22/10 16:11
SupcrSet Refcn:ncc: 10-0000{52201 re\' OU
Note
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Analytc Name
Mercury, Total
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
QNQC Report
Domtar Industries
Domtar Plymouth/00625.09.00 I
Water
Lab Control Sample Summary
Inorganic Parameters
Lab Control Sample
JI005618-LCS
Spike
Method Result Amount 1¼1 W.cc
% Rec
Limits
245.1 5.34 5.26 101 85 -115
Rf!lults flogged with an astcri~k (•) indicate Htlues outside control criteria.
Service Req ucst: .110056 l 8
Date Analyzed: 11/22/10
Units: µg/L
Basis: NA
Percent rcCO\'cries and relative pcrci.:nt differences (RPO) are r.ktennined by the software using values in the calculation which have not been rounded.
Printed 11/23/10 14:46
\\lnllow21Starlims\Li1nsRcps\l..abControlSamplc.1p1
Form 3C
SupcrSet Reference: JO-OOOO\p2201 rev 00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.£:< Columbia ~~ Analytical Services·· Cooler Receipt Form
Client: D"'"" -~..-Service Request#: j/01>{6!f
Project:
Cooler received on {1-{'l -10 and opened on Li-19-10 by 0--t1
COURIER: CAS UPS ~ Client Other Airbill #'i lt2.. CP-11 'tOS-o
I Were custody seals on outside of cooler? Yes ~
If yes, how many and where? "· on lid other " -
2 Were seals intact and signature and date correct? Yes ?-io <3!11>
3 Were custody papers properly filled out? GJ No NIA
LL 4 Temperature of coolcr(s) upon receipt (Should he> 0°C and< 6°C) ------------
5 Thennometer ID t\~ ------------
6 Temperature Blank Presen(I a.;.; No
7 Were Ice or Ice Packs present ,ke) Ice Packs No
8 Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken, etc. ,,)? /(cs') No NIA
9 Type of packing material present Netting Vial Holder B'"5blel\l}ap
Paper Styrofoam Other NIA
10 Were all bottle labels complete (sample ID, preservation, etc .... )? ® ~o NIA
11 Did all bottle labels and tags agree with custody papers? <fi:s) No NIA
12 Were the correct bottles used for the tests indicated? &;> No NIA
I 3 Were all of the preserved bottles received wi1h the appropriate preservative? ,GJ No NIA
~"-1<2 H2S04 pH<2 ZnAc2/NaOH pH>9 NaOH pH>l2 HCI pH<2
PrcscrY~ti·,e additions noted :lt!low
14 Were all samples received within analysis holding times? ~ No NIA
15 Were VOA vials checked for absence of air bubbles? If present, note below Yes No ~ ...
16 Where did the bottles originate? c_CAS ) Client
Sample ID Reagent Lot# ml added Initials Date/Time
Additional comments and/or explanation of all discrepancies noted above:
Client approval to run samples if discrepancies noted: Date: 8
- --- -- -------------&-S Columbia Jacksonville. Laboratory
Analytical Services-Condition Upon Receipt -Sample pH
SR• J / 005 f:/ f Date: u-1? -,J Initials: c/=-G.
Nole thal pH is check and meets the requited pH criterion listed in the column heading unless otherwise noted on the cooler receipt form
Code 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
40ml 40ml 40ml 125m 125m 125m 125m .t250ml ?5Qm .1250m 50m 50m 50m 50m oom OOm oom OOm 500m 1L 1L 1L 1L 1L 2oz 4oz 8oz 16oz 100ml Z1rMocl< Misc.
Container G G G P p p p p p p p p G G p p p p G p p G G G G G G G p p Misc
I
Preserve ].JU,'\_
t:.,2 t c. ;
HO 5203 ."WAoi I ' ZnAcV 1·-.. , --j ----, :.-·~.-1 1· f. ' i . • ' . -~ ' '"" ,_ ' .. -7
' ' '. ' l:w"'~ \:N,A'. : l:1u;;,1 l,WA ! liNtAi.ll!i-uA' 1 ilNii.•· htA✓ HO H2$04 HN03 a.WA.> H2S04 HN03 NaOH N;.OH ),NIA, HN03 HQ H2S04 HNOJ HNOJ HCO H2S04 WA S:-03 . W>.'.
Rea. oH [tl!A'J <2 <Z <Z I 'wA, •2 <Z >9 ,., lWA, ., .'tUAJ <2 <2 <2 1ow,.,. {-w,1,. <2 ~-NIAJ <2 <2 L1N.'A', 1_,N/A,\j ttuA 1 UIA."J' NIA: t tJ/A'I l NJ>.'j
Sample# . ---. . . -. . ·:1:;
-1 l ' --. -1
-2 ' ·,•J -2
-3 ' ·-.. <" -· I -3
-4 -4
-5 -5
-6
-7 -7
-8 -8
-9 I .g
-10 -10
-11 -11
-12 ~---12
-13 -13
-14 . -14
-1:J -15
.· -16 -16
-17 -17
-18 -18
-19 -19
-20 -20
-21 -21
-22 ' -22
-23 -23
-24 -24
-25 I -25
-26 -26
-27 -27
-20 I -26
-29 I -29
-30 -30
-31 -31
-32 32
-33 -33
-34 -34
-35 -35
-36 -36
-37 -37
-38
-39
~-i---1--+---i---l---l---l---f----+----+--11---l---l---1--',~---t--+---+----t--+---+----t--+-.l-l--+-----t--ll--+-----+--11--+--+-~·3~8~--1 -39
-40 -40
NOTE: VOA pH checks are performed by the analytical area, not sample control
-------------------RNIT CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD 77385
30 Patewood Drive, Suite 100, Patewood Plaza One, Greenville, SC 29615-3535
Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] Preserved {Code)
Date Time
//JD
/.J_ 6D
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
Relinquished by !Signature)
R.;jjj;,quished by (Signature)
Sample Station ID
Gw
cP-oc;-1
iJ-/046/ 6LLJ 'I.
Received by (Signature (d £1--n-1rzi-o
Dote/Time Received by (Signature) Dote/Time
F' p(' .-1(-n ·10 c>9 ll
Date/Time Received by (Signature) Dote/Time
HAZARDS ASSOCIATED
WITH SAMPLES
D Flammable
D Corrosive
□ Highly Toxic
D Other (list)
Custody Seal: Present/ Absent Intact/Not Intact Seal #s
F-268 (10/08) WHITE-LABORATORY COPY
C-H2S04
D-NoOH
E-Hct
F-METHANOL
G-
Turn Around (circle one) Normal Ru::.h
Report Due ___________ _
(For Lab Use Only)
Receipt Temp:
Temp Blank Y N
YELLOW-REPORT APPENDIX
Receipt pH
(Wet/Metals)
PINK-SAM.Pl.ER/SUBMITTER
---
RMT. Inc. I Domtar
P,v-lj<lrol!)!71\hco/lT1:'010\YO,,Js
-- - - --- -----Sample Collection Checklist for Domtar Former Chlorine Plant
November 2010
Project
Project Number:
Sample Date:
Type of Turnaround:
QC Package:
.. . . ··MJDiA.-:.'.
GROUNDWATER
Domtar --001o;;,c;-,oq,oo\
Week of 11\15\2010
Standard
NIA
CP-01-2
CP-01-3R
CP-02-1
CP-02-2
CP-04-1
CP-04-3
CP-05-2
CP-06-1
CP-06-2
CP-07-1
CP-07-2
CP-08-2
CP-08-3
CP-03-1
CP-03-3
CP-09-1
C0-09-2
CP-10-1
CP-10-2
CP-11-1
CP-11-2
CP-12-1
CP-12-2
CP-13-1
CP-14-1
CP-15-1
MW-2
.-7 .• • .
. . ~--, -~;·;;wou o;pu;-:.,;.
11
CAS Labs
9143 Philips Highway, Suite 200
Jacksonville, FL 32256
Contact Tom Kissinger
904-739-2277 lab
904-739-2011 fax
Analytical Method: Analyze for total mercury using USEPA method 245.1.
Sample Containers: 125 ml ultra clean glass bottle with HNO3 preservative.
Volume: minimum 125 ml
Collect 1 field duplicate and 1 field blank
RMT Project Manager: Mike Parker
RMT Project Contact: Dan Madison
RMT Alternate Contacts: Britney Barnes
Work Order Prepared By/Date: BCB
Work Order QCed By/Date: MBP
-. --~,--· . ----~-:,--,:
Collect Water Levels on all wells.
-- --
November 2010
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RAfT Norri, Carolina, Inc. I Domtar Paper Company, LLC
Monitoring Report B-1
J:lll'/'GV!.l/'.fT/1(){)6]5',()<NJ0JIR00f,15090/JJ.I/0/.NJC.\'
Appendix B
Field Notes
January 2011
- ------· ----· -_, - - - - --
·~ ,; .. ;,j'
,,,,A,,:,;
/~
. · .. •
CJS9
I
!
I--
i
I
i
' ! .!
i
--1-C • --- -----• ---------~--_ I I _______ J -~ _ ,-oh-~fQ1--.:-rrc~r-=f=i-
-----I D l f -----CS) rr1r·-----------j-(P9---,o~~o·:s-1GQ --C/F<oF1Jr--·