NCD991278540_20090130_Weyerhaeuser Company_FRBCERCLA SAP QAPP_Monitoring Report OU-3 January 2009-OCR

/
-'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
' l
• ENVIRONMENT• ENERGY• ENGINEERING
Monitoring Report
Operable Unit No. 3 (OU-3) • Former Chlorine Plant Area
Domtar Paper Company, LLC, Martin County, North Carolina
January 2009
,. 7"1\\{·· ~"' -·-:·--.~,;] ,. . . . '•I "-..';.~i1,,:i• :~tK . ,. i."'-' J.' .. ~ ·,';lf11' ~, w ... .11, ···,:.. ":
,•u.t I "• i,. ·;i.'f,, I t'
,,. •. " ;JJ',._"'-·.,
ly
'-=--' Domtar
January 30, 2009
Domtar Pap~r Company, LLC
Plymouth Mill
PO Bo:•. 7,17
Highway 149 Nor th
Plymoutl1, f\JC 27962
Tel [phone]
Certified c-JflERFUND SECTION
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Randy Bryant
Remedial Project Manager
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Region 4
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
Subject: Domtar Paper Company, LLC, l'lymouth, N.C.
Operable Unit No. 3 (OU-3; Former Chlorine Plant, Semiannual
Monitoring Report
Dear Mr. Bryant:
Enclosed please find 3 copies of the former Chlorine Plant Semiannual Monitoring
Report. The purpose of the report is to present the results of the Fonner Chlorine Plant
Area surface containment system inspection and groundwater monitoring events
conducted during the week of December 1, 2008. A copy of the report has also been
provided lo the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Please contact me if you have questions or comments concerning the document.
Bill Morris
Environmental Engineer
Domtar Plymouth Mill
~ ---------~---xc:J'!_ilc Testermanj
Marcel Sylvestre
Diane Hardison
www.do111t<11.com
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
••••••••
.
• ENVIRONMENT • ENERGY • ENGINEERING
~~{CfFEOW~Jm
FEBO 2 2009 ~
Monitoring Report SUPERFUNO SECTION
Operable Unit No. 3 (OU-3) -Former Chlorine Plant Area
Domtar Paper Company, LLC, Martin County, North Carolina
Michael B. Parker, P.E.
Senior Client Service Manager
January 2009
Heather H. Smith
Environmental Specialist
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
/: \ WPGVL \P .moo.nJ J 71\03 IR0005 I 7 J 03-002. DOC
01008 RMT. Inc.
All Rights Reserv,•d
30 Patewood Doive. Suite 100 • Greenville, SC 29615-3535 • [phone] • [phone] FAX• www.rmtir1c.com
C R E A T I N G B A L A N C E'"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table· of Contents
Certification .................................................................................................................................................. ii
I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ I
1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. I
1.2 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... I
2. Methods .............................................................................................................................................. 3
3. Results and Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 5
3. I Surface Cap Containment System Monitoring ........................................................................ 5
3.2 Groundwater Monitoring ......................................................................................................... 5
List of Tables
Table I
Table 2
Table 3
List of Figures
Figure I
Figure 2
List of Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Historical Groundwater Elevations ............................................................................. 9
Historical Mercury Analyses of Groundwater Samples ............................................ IO
Historical Groundwater Monitoring Field Parameters .............................................. 13
Sample Locations ........................................................................................................ 4
Water Table Surfaces .................................................................................................. 8
Analytical Data
Photographic Log
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
l:\WPG VLIP J7l00-05 I 7 J\OJ'R0005 I 7 J 03-Qa]./)OC Janua1y 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Certification
The hydrogeology work for the Domtar Paper Company, LLC (Domtar), Plymouth Mill in Martin
County, North Carolina, was performed by an RMT, Inc. consulting hydrogeologist in support of RMT
North Carolina, Inc.
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
l:IIYl'GVI.V'J/100-0517 /IOJI/W/1()5/ 7 /03-002 OOC
~
RMT, Inc.
ii
January 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.1 Background
Section 1
Introduction
Operable Unit No. 3 (OU-3), also referred to as the Former Chlorine Plant Area, is located at the Domtar
Paper Company, LLC (Domtar), Plymouth Mill in Martin County, North Carolina. The Record of
Decision (ROD) for this area was issued in September 2003. The negotiated Consent Decree [Civil
Action 4:03-CV-90(1-1)(3)] established remedial design (RD) and remedial action (RA) activities for this
area. The RA activities were completed during 2006, with the Pre-Final RA inspection accepted as the
Final RA inspection under United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) approval in August
2006. The Interim RA report was completed and approved by USEPA on September 29, 2006.
The Pe1formance Standard, Verification Plan (PSVP)ft,r Former Chlorine Plant Area (RMT, 2005)
describes procedures for the inspection, monitoring, and reporting activities required for the Former
Chlorine Plant Arca. The PSVP was required by the Statement of Work (SOW) for the Former Chlorine
Plant Arca in response to the USE!' A Consent Order Docket No. 98-10-C issued by US EPA on March 24,
1998.
The performance monitoring activities for the Former Chlorine Plant Area are being conducted according
to the PSVP and as such have been divided into two technical tasks. The objective of each task is listed
below:
■ Task I. Surface Cap Containment System Monitoring
A surface cap containment system reduces the infiltration of surface water in the vicinity of the
Former Chlorine Plant Arca. The objective of the surface cap containment system is to assure that
the cover system components are maintained, including concrete, asphalt, and stormwatcr system
components. The surface cap containment system is inspected on a semiannual basis for surface
cracks, holes, depressions, or other signs of surface integrity degradation. Construction of the
surface cap containment system was completed in August 2006.
■ Task 2. Groundwater Monitoring
The objective of the groundwater monitoring program is to assess the effectiveness of the remedy to
protect groundwater quality by reducing the migration of mercury from the Fonner Chlorine Plant
Arca. Institutional controls arc applied to the Former Chlorine Plant Area in order to prevent future
use of the groundwater as a potable water source.
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this monitoring report is to present the results of the Former Chlorine Plant Arca surface
cap containment system inspection (Task I) and groundwater monitoring (Task 2) events conducted
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
I: \ll'l'G VVP J7l00-05 I 7 /\OJIR000J 17 JO 3-002.IJOC JanuwJ' 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
during the week of December I, 2008. This report presents surface cap inspection results, and analytical
data from groundwater sampling, pre-and post-construction water table elevations, and provides
recommendations for modifications in the sampling plan. Water table elevations and mercury
concentrations for the semiannual sampling events (November 2006, May 2007, November 2007, May
2008 and December 2008) arc compared to baseline sampling results obtained in February 2006.
According to the PSVP, semiannual monitoring was to be conducted through fall 2008, followed by
annual monitoring until the 5-year review.
Monitoring l?eport -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Arca
I: \Wl'G VI. IPJJ',00-0j I 7 !\OJIROOOj 17 J 03-00].I}( JC
2
January 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section 2
Methods
A baseline sampling event was conducted by RMT North Carolina, Inc. (RMT) during the week of
January 22, 2006. This sampling event served as the baseline for the short and long-term performance
monitoring of the Former Chlorine Plant Area. Remedial activities (target soil excavation, barrier wall
installation, and surface capping) took place between March and August 2006. Semiannual sampling
events were initiated in November 2006. The initial sampling event served to evaluate any immediate
changes in groundwater flow or groundwater mercury concentration levels due to the remedial
construction activities as well as a basis for evaluating remedy effectiveness. Subsequent semiannual
sampling events took place in May 2007, November 2007, May 2008 and December 2008. In addition,
two new monitoring wells were installed at the Former Chlorine Plant Area in November 2007.
Groundwater monitoring well locations arc depicted on Figure 1.
Groundwater samples were collected using low flow purge methods in which a minimum of three well
volumes of groundwater were removed before sample collection. Groundwater samples were analyzed by
Columbia Analytical Services in Jacksonville, Florida for mercury using USEPA Method 245.1. The
laboratory analytical data reports for December 2008 are included in Appendix A. Purge water was
contained, sampled, and properly discharged into the on-site wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
/:I WP( i Vl, 11' J7\/JO-OJ J 7 /I OJ IROOOJ { 7 /03-001.DOC
3
January 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t.lETAI. BULKHEAD / SEA WALL
@CP-16-1
@CP-12-1
CP-12-2
0 60'
~t e 4 t 4F¼I
SCALE: 1 "= 60'
LEGEND
1------1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER EQUIPMENT
AND SUBSURFACE UTILITIES !_ ______ J
EXISTING EQUIPMENT
BURIED CONCRETE SLABS
@MW-2-2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION
NOTES
1. BASE MAP PRODUCED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC DATA SERVICES,
INC.
2. DETAILS OF MAP DETERMINED FROM FIGURE 5 OF HLA (1992),
WEYERHAEUSER 1951 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS OF THE FORMER
CHLORINE PLANT, AND FIELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY
WEYERHAEUSER STAFF. DATA TRANSFERRED FROM FIGURE 8 OF
HLA (1992).
PROJECT: FORMER CHLORINE PLANT AREA
DOMTAR PAPER COMPANY
MARTIN COUNTY, NOR'Tli CAROLINA
SHEET TITLE: SAMPLE LOCATIONS
PROJ. NO. 5171.03 f---"'DRA=WN:.:...,BY:.:..:...' __ _:AH=S-i SCALE:
CHECKED BY: TAT >S NOTED Fll£ NO. ~171.03--001.DWG
APPROVED BY: DATE PRINTED:
120' DATE: JANUARY 2009 FIGURE 1
;.J Patewood Plaza Ono, Suite 100 30 Pot8Wood Drive
Greenville, S.C. 29615-3535
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section 3
Results and Discussion
This section presents the results of the baseline and semiannual surface cap and groundwater monitoring
activities. Where applicable, results are compared to data from previous monitoring activities.
3.1 Surface Cap Containment System Monitoring
The surface cap containment system is inspected during each semiannual monitoring sampling event as
described in the PSYP. The surface cap containment system was inspected for surface cracks, holes,
depressions, and other signs of surface integrity degradation. The surface cap was found to be in good
condition during the December 2008 semiannual inspection. Photographs taken of the surface cap
containment system, including areas around monitoring wells and storm water drains during the December
2008 inspection, are presented in Appendix B. No maintenance or repairs to the surface cap containment
system are recommended at this time.
3.2 Groundwater Monitoring
The water table elevations measured during the baseline sampling event in January 2006 and the
subsequent semiannual monitoring events are summarized in Table I. A water table map for the
December 2008 sampling event is presented in Figure 2. In January 2006, prior to installation of the
Waterloo® barrier wall, there was a small ridge in the water table surface extending from a mounded area
at monitoring well CP-10-1 (western end of the Former Chlorine Plant Arca) to a second, lesser mounded
area at monitoring well CP-08-1 (northeastern end of the Fonner Chlorine Plant Area). This ridge was
still present during the December 2008 sampling event. On the northern end of this ridge, groundwater
flows northward to the Roanoke River. South of the ridge, groundwater appears to flow south and then to
the northeast towards monitoring well CP-11-1 where it ultimately discharges into the Roanoke River.
The water table is at its lowest elevation at well CP-11-1.
The installation of the Waterloo® barrier wall continues to have only minor impact on the overall water
table surface at the site. In November 2006, the water level within the confines of the barrier wall
(CP-06-1) was 5.89 feet mean sea level (msl), which is 1.3 to 2.89 feet higher than the water elevations
measured in wells surrounding the barrier. In May 2008, the water level within the barrier perimeter was
slightly higher with an elevation of 4.98 feet msl, 0.25 to 2.05 feet higher than the water elevations
measured in wells directly surrounding the barrier. In December 2008, the water level within the barrier
perimeter increased to 5.27 feet msl, 0.1 J to 1.3 feet higher than the water elevations measured in wells
directly surrounding the barrier. The water level at CP-06-1 (located inside the Waterloo® barrier) has
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area 5
I:\ WJ'(j l'!,V'J1100-0517/IOJIR000517 I 0J-002.DOC January 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
continued to slightly Ouctuatc since installation of the barrier. Outside of the barrier perimeter, the water
table configurations in May 2008 and December 2008 are similar to the baseline water table map (January
2006).
Table 2 presents the mercury analytical results for groundwater samples collected from the designated
wells as outlined in the Pe1fur111a11ce Standards Verification Plan (RMT 2005). Field parameters
measured include pH, specific conductance (SC), dissolved oxygen (DO), turbidity, and temperature are
presented in Table 3.
Mercury results were below the method detection limits for most of the groundwater samples collected.
The North Carolina groundwater quality standard for mercury is 0.00 I 05 mg/L (15 NCAC 02L.0202,
revised April 2005). Mercury concentrations detected during the baseline and semiannual sampling
events arc summarized as follows:
■ Baseline Monitoring Event (January 2006)-Thc concentrations of mercury in monitoring wells
CP-02-1, CP-04-1, CP-05-1, and CP-08-1 were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the January
2006 monitoring event.
■ Semiannual Monitoring Event (November 2006)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring
wells CP-01-2, CP-04-1, CP-05-1, and MW-lB were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the
November 2007 monitoring event.
■ Semiannual Monitoring Event (May 2007) -The concentrations of mercury in monitoring wells
CP-01-2, CP-04-1, CP-05-1, CP-08-1, and MW-IB were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the
May 2007 monitoring event.
■ Semiannual Monitoring Event (November 2007)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring
wells CP-01-2, CP-0 l-3R, CP-04-1, CP-05-1, CP-08-1, and CP-08-3 were above the 2L Standard for
mercury in the November 2007 monitoring event
■ Semiannual Monitoring Event (May 2008) -The concentrations of mercury in monitoring wells
CP-04-1, CP-05-1, CP-08-1 and MW-I B were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the May 2008
monitoring event
■ Semiannual Monitoring Event (December 2008)-The concentrations of mercury in monitoring
wells CP-04-1, CP-05-1, MW-I Band CP-01-2 were above the 2L Standard for mercury in the
December monitoring event
A slight reduction in detected mercury concentrations was observed in two of the monitoring wells
(CP-04-1 and CP-05-1) from May 2008 to December 2008 monitoring event. When comparing the five
monitoring data sets the mercury concentrations are fluctuating. Specifically, mercury concentrations
appear to be fluctuating at MW-I 13, with detected concentrations above the 2L standard in May 2007,
May 2008 and December 2008, compared to a detected concentration below the 2L standard in
November 2007. The mercury concentrations in shallow well CP-08-1 have fluctuated slightly above the
North Carolina 2L groundwater standard from May 2007 to May 2008, and the detectable mercury
concentration fell below the 2L standard in December 2008. Mercury was detected in well CP-01-2 at
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
f: I WI'(; VT, IP J /100-05 I 7 I 1/JJ '}/(/0051710 3-002. nae
6
January 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
concentrations about the 2L standard in December 2008, compared to non-detect in May 2008. Mercury
concentrations were above the 2L standard in November 2007 at replacement well CP-0 l-3R and
CP-08-3 and may have been affected by well construction activities conducted just prior to sampling.
Mercury was not detected at wells CP-0 l-3R and CP-08-3 in May and December 2008. The mercury
concentrations in deeper well CP-08-2 fluctuated from the baseline sampling event to May 2007 sampling
event at concentrations below the 2L Standard. Mercury has been non-detect in groundwater samples
from well CP-08-2 in the past three (November 2007, May and December 2008) sampling events.
Mercury was detected at a concentration below the 2L Standard in well CP-03-3 in December 2008. This
is the first time mercury has been detected in this well. This well is located outside of the Waterloo®
barrier wall to the northeast adjacent to the bulkhead. This well will continue to be monitored until the
five year review.
The monitoring results continue to show that the majority of the wells had no detectable mercury.
Specifically during December 2008, 26 of the 30 area wells had no detectable concentrations of mercury
(consistent with the upgradient wells). Of the four wells that contained mercury above the 2L Standard,
two (MW-I B and CP-01-2) arc located north of the barrier perimeter and two (CP-04-1 and CP-05-1) are
located south of the barrier perimeter. At all four locations, the measured concentrations of mercury were
generally consistent over the six reported rounds with slight fluctuations on a well by well basis and no
increase in the area of impacted groundwater.
In accordance with the PSVP, it is recommended that the monitoring be conducted annually until the
five-year review. The groundwater trends will continue to be monitored and evaluated during the next
sampling event scheduled in November/December 2009. At this time, the surface cap containment
system will also be inspected for surface cracks, holes, depressions, or other signs of surface integrity
degradation.
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
I: 1 Wl'G VI. 1p J7100-0J J 7 /\0J\R000517 I 03-002.OOC
7
January 2009
-----------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PRooucn
ON FACJLfry
0 60'
t ,, L
M ~
SCALE: 1 "= 60'
LEGEND
-------~ I I
I I --------APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF FORMER EQUIPMENT
AND SUBSURFACE UTILITIES
@MW-2
3.65
NOTES
EXISTING EQUIPMENT
BURIED CONCRETE SLABS
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL LOCATION
WITH GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR.
DASHED WHERE INFERRED.
CONTOUR INTERVAL AS SHOWN.
1. BASE MAP PRODUCED BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC DATA SERVICES,
INC.
2. DETAILS OF MAP DETERMINED FROM FIGURE 5 OF HLA (1992),
WEYERHAEUSER 1951 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS OF THE FORMER
CHLORINE PLANT, AND FIELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY
WEYERHAEUSER STAFF. DATA TRANSFERRED FROM FIGURE 8 OF
HLA (1992).
PROJECT: FORMER CHLORINE PLANT AREA
DOMTAR PAPER COMPANY
MARTIN COUNTY, NORTii CAROLINA
SHEET TITLE: WATER TABLE SURFACE
DECEMBER \ 2008
DRAWN BY, OOM/AHS SCALE, PROJ. NO. 5171.03
CHECKED BY: DOM AS NOTED Fil.£ NO. WJ0--00.!1111.03-001.0WO
APPROVED BY: OAT£ PRINTED:
120' DATE: JANUARY 2009
1
FIGURE 2
Patewood Plaza One, Suite 1 00
30 Patewood Drive
Greenville, S.C. 29615-3535
Phone: [phone]JO
Fax: [phone]
- - -- ------- -- ----Table 1
Historical Groundwater Ele'rntions
rr · • ','i!'<S~iyi:,:crQ~;.+ 'i~j>r~Tll)9f,:,, ,,,;_ROU~D\t~!'E.R;~, :,,oE(iI(fo~ c,cl\9,@p)i,~f:; ;,PE!i~'fo':,~ r:c;•o~,o,iy,n'•'--»ll(ATE)\1ilf, :;;ii .. • 7.~ ,·;-.: •., .;l'ELF1T'B's;iJ ;jc,~ATEJ!;\,s; .!:.c-~IEYA}')O':'it' ,:,:;i;~tT.,•]];'4 6'.if,__ELEV~T.10,~c•: .ic;>'.~!!'.R'::·.J! ~;f'EL[:"no,~ LEl)'T)ONjglf) ~: ::,._r;;:5 '~: ,;~~\t~l;f~?o -~C:(~t1it~ l\::r,_fii!~~~~~~~ ~~~-e.rtt?~:; ~1'/~?(~!f~!J,1eyp ;;'11l!~~p~ J~'¥(~~\f!f..W=~1 . (~fk .~•.-:: ;.;·· ~< ,". '<...'.:; \-'i~;:;-.., :_""; F-.]e :; , ,;i;oS/30/07, S!' ;,,q";..;.c°?'OSI.J0/07,:C,,r~j,' ,s'.;;£ ll/06f07.,'2:.,;:', ~51>. ll/06/07!)~ .: <t /-7.'4:_os/lJ/OJI~ z' i-'0-lostu/08~~.;g ~., '. • .:..:,:·12t0I/08ti:,i;.t._~
MW-018 8.32 4.45 3.87 3.74 4.58 4.35 3.97 3.6 4.72
CP-01-2
CP-01-3
CP-01-JR
CP-02-1
CP-02-2
CP-03-1
CP-03-2
CP-03-3
CP-04-1
CP-04-2
CP-04-3
CP-05-1
CP-05-2
CP-06-l
CP-06-2
CP-07-1
CP-07-2
CP-08-1
CP-08-2
CP-08-3
CP-09-1
CP-09-2
CP-10-1
CP-10-2
CP-11-1
CP-l 1-2
CP-12-1
CP-12-2
CP-13-1
CP-14-1
CP-15-1
r-..-fW-02
MW-02-2
" 1 ),,frasured 111 feel
l'I Measured in feet above site datum
~'M -Not measured, well not accessable
7.93
8.22
8.14
7.88
7.85
7.94
8.09
8.17
7.50
7.57
7.46
7.75
7.73
7.50
7.54
8.16
8.11
7.59
7.57
8.10
7 48
7.46
7.46
7.49
7.62
7.69
8.01
8.10
11.56
11.54
11.54
7.41
7,74
R/o.rT Nor1h Carolina. Inc. I Domtar Paper Company. LLC
Afon11,:mng Repon
OU-3 · Former Chlorine Pf<lnf Area
I 1/J'pG 11, 'i' J1VJO--OJ I 7 l <oJ,(}()l)j/ 7/0J.(IOJ XLS
4.68 3.25 4.79
NM NM NM
NM NM NM
5.15 2.73 5.42
4.90 2.95 5 06
4.27 3.67 3.69
5.10 2.99 5.14
6.08 2.09 5.77
3.78 3.72 4.07
4.60 2.97 4.78
4.57 2.89 4 27
4.49 3.26 4.65
4.77 2.96 4.88
2.02 5.48 2.90
2.25 5.29 3.14
5.12 3.04 5.31
5.12 2.99 5_;5
2.71 4.88 2.36
4.58 2.99 4.71
NM NM NM
5.06 2.42 5.92
4.55 2.91 4.98
0,93 6.53 1.95
4.48 3.01 5.02
6.41 1.21 6.39
4.80 2.89 4.99
5.00 3.01 5.42
5.16 2.94 5.39
8 51 3.05 8.65
8.49 3.05 8.63
NM NM NM
4.71 2.70 4.77
4.49 3 25 4.67
3.14 4.50 3.43 4.45 3.48
NM NM NM NM NM
NM 5.30 2.84 5.03 3.11
2.46 4.95 2.93 5.07 2.81
2.79 4.78 3.07 4.74 3.11
4.25 4.15 3.79 2.52 5.42
2.95 4.92 3.17 4.77 3.32
2.40 5,80 2.37 5.53 2.64
3.43 3.60 3.90 3.67 3.83
2.79 4.42 3.15 4.43 3.14
3.19 4.35 3.11 4.32 3.14
3.10 4.26 3.49 4.21 3.54
2.85 4.54 3.19 4.57 3.16
4.60 2 52 4.98 2.23 5.27
4.40 2.75 4.79 2.44 5.10
2.85 4.99 3.17 4.85 3.3 I
2.86 4.94 3.17 4.86 3.25
5.23 2.86 4.73 2.20 5.39
2.86 4.40 3.17 4.27 3.30
NM 4.17 3.93 5.95 2.15
1.56 5.20 2.28 5.35 2.13
2.48 4.41 3.05 4 42 3.04
5.51 1.09 6.37 0.89 6.57
2.47 4.35 3 14 4.40 3.09
1.23 6.29 1.33 5.75 1 87
2.70 4.59 3.10 4.45 3.24
2.59 4.72 3.29 4.79 3.22
2.71 4.98 3.12 4.88 3.22
2.91 8.33 3.23 8.40 3.16
2.91 8.30 3_;4 8.39 3.15
NM NM NM NM NM
2.64 4.59 2.82 3.76 3 65
3.07 4.25 3.49 4.13 3.61
9 January 2009
-
I
:I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 2
Historical Mercury Analyses ofGrounilwater Samples
Allu\'inl nquifer (water table)
MW-018
CP-02-1
CP-03-1
CP-04-1
CP-05-1
CP-07-1
CP-08-!
CP-09-1
Cl'-10-1
CP-11-1
CP-12-1
RAfTNorlh Carolina, Inc. I Domwr !'aper Company. !JC
Moniloring Rrport
OU-3 -Formttr Chlorme Pfon1 Area
/:11!'pGIVI'JnOU,U5/7JlOJ1oou51110J-/J/J].\'/.\'
:lt.l'\:'~T"S MPU .. ~"I;( ?:(} L~·111q·~ ~•lf1"£ •··t 1i0;'4'i i\ " ··ij '#·ff. It/~· ' MF.RCUR'I ''""' ''1· iJ: •: l~.l$!.'!¥ ?~~+l\~:,;~ 4 :~,1~1:,:•;.1~{~t~~~t;l2t1!:
01/24/06 0.001
I !/07/06 :'".,t.-,\ft; .;,:-"',,.o.0021,:JJ1rs:::1y~t:;;
05/30/07 ~~~ ··,;;k 'Yll':\1V.O.OO 1-5-.'.'!i.1:-;~:.1;,,Ji
11/07/07 0.001
05/13/08 ±;'..:.rJz:: i~,W.\: 0 .00 I 2: 'l"Jr'l~J.;tK
12/05/08 ;'i½J\lt;id§lJ!?\1" li' 0 .00 I 5 ,.'.,f1fi.j;1:{J.'.-S!
01/25/06 !),8-;P'i!'h:';( 't';';';f O. 00 12 1'."FtJ. £.\1'f: <fol
11/08/06 0.0005
05/31/07 <0.0002
11/08/07 0.0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
01/24/06 <0.0002
11/07/06 <0.0002
05/30/07 <0.0002
I 1/07/07 <0.0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
01/25/06 '.,,\'J.'l:illt.·.;: ·~-~0.068 J?l['."_:::;.._)f .. -::
11/08/06 ~?-V..:S;t:,r,:,rn: os4 ;:'-, ~-,t!f-14'
05/31/07 r\f,t:,¥Q 1'\&f l\k 0 :0089 :qt_,\JJ{t-;j\,Wifl
I !/08/07 Si??';tifC5'.)f~';) 0. 0 14 £0."k:ffi ,\;W.9l\;',
05/13/08 1;;1,-:: (t?B.1!..l!"£1moo89<1'l-,t,-.i1:'; ,; -•-,%
12/05/08 !'.;,~;,__ ·:,,~l½·J\..0.007 8};;lAk·r<K'\-·'>'i',
01/25/06 •'_':'' c,;n,;w;mo1or;i. 1-.7~~50 ·-;,.;,
11/08/06 :,.;:·g, · '£/ ;.t.i"'. 0 .027./ ,-f l~!ili~.~
05/31/07 'l\l'Zi\;' ,t'* ,';J'.IQ.0J-37:::'})•':·\" f;,•! ~~
11/08/07 .~'½1!::l".fi•.&filW~ 0: 069 ::_sr_;>?t .72_•~" ,;
05/13/08 !,l{\'i_S\)f..!£;-dFt.t0.024 ti':'.' '\~-/1bt'(•\',\
12/05/08 ll¼t}t.W;,1ti.1fl_;;,,: 0 :0079 iJJC:s ·. ,.iJ.tJit
0!/25/06 <0.0002
11/07/06 <0,0002
05/03/99 <0.0002
I !/08/07 <0.0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
0!/25/06 .. ,·.•. ;-/'.f;.f/0.0014ii(.Jy?, :ti-'\
I !/07/06 0.0004
05/30/07 Jll'-:ff~-.;-r.":.. 0.0015.:;; '.·~>.U'.1,'.1,'
I 1/08/07 4r,"'4"" .. ";I_·.:v. 0.00 l-2'ts:.;:_\i/l'.-• ~ .,_,
05/13/08 r,, ... 'ci\Mitt--"' ,.0.00141:.1-!'r_,,-·.D/.S-'
12/05/08 0.0007
01/24/06 0.0007
11/08/06 <0.0002
05/31 /07 <0.0002
! 1/08/07 <0.0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
01/24/06 <0.0002
11/08/06 <0.0002
05/31/07 <0,0002
11/08/07 <0.0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
0 l/24/06 <0.0002
I l/07/06 <0.0002
05/30/07 <0.0002
11/07/07 <0.0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
01/24/06 <0.0002
11/07/06 <0.0002
05/30/07 <0.0002
11/07/07 <0.0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0,0005 U
Ill J111111ary 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 2
I listorical Mercury Analyses of Groumlwatcr Samples
'
CP-13-1
CP-14-1
CP-15-1
MW-02
Allu\'ial aauifer (-20 ft clevalion'
CP-01-2
CP-02-2
CP-03-2
CP-04-2
CP-05-2
CP-07-2
CP-08-2
CP-09-2
RMT Norlh Corofino, Inc. I /Jom/ar /'apaC0111pa11y. /,1,C
Momtoring /frporl
OU-3 -Former Chlor111e !'lam Area
/, ,w,,(H 1.'-1' moo-OJ 17/l~JIOl)Qj/ 7 /QJ.f/(/] .l'Ll
•->~•;{~!
01/25/06
I !/08/06
05/31/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
01/25/06
11/08/06
05/3 ]/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
01/25/06
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
01/24/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
01/25/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
01/24/06
! 1/07/06
05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
01/25/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
I !/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
01/25/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/05/08
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
11/08/07
05/!3/08
12/05/08
01/25/06
11/07/06
05/30/07
l 1/08/07
05/! 3/08
12/05/08
01/24/06
11/08/06
05/31/07
l 1/08/07
05/13/08
l 2/05/08
II
r~;r~ ~-MERCURY11l'{ji.\➔fJ},.~
wi it.;-~ VJji;"""'f•'"" .~f:•1· .. ,,.,h: ,u u/ .it~ ; .'.\(mwJ,)) ,,1\¾1 g;s'(g,
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0,0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
zJ.0,'.' ..->~::•,;:;'-/40.00561. AJ,\..~_ ;·•:
\➔i\fill*•,tt\11? ~0.0038 ;: '<tttt>'!<illl'L
:Jli'.l,~l~!°S"::0.001-1 ,., Jfi/.!:!Y'?'J5
<0.0005
·,<"''t.::u.•.'1'."¾'410:0022, '_$" '-, . ,/ ,-,,,
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
0.0004
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
0.0006
<0.0002
<0.0002
0.0007
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
0.0002
0.0003
0.0002
0.0003
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0.0002
0.0006
0.0007
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
<0,0002
<0.0002
0.0002
<0.0002
<0.0005
<0.0005 U
Jomwry 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 2
Historical Mercury Amdyses of Groundwater Samples
t1t{'i~~ ~"":•~1l-c;\)f\;ff~ ,, -.-,
01;~0~
t''-,St < . A" WEI.L mtj'. ·r: . t •;rn ,.·· x•'c •• "A!;-d "'!i!' .. ,:..t~ __ ;; :i... ft: ~. •
11/08/06 0.0004
CP-10-2 05/31/07 <0.0002
11/08/07 0.0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
! 2/05/08 <0.0005 U
01/24/06 <0.0002
11/07/06 <0.0002
CP-! 1-2 05/30/07 <0.0002
11/07/07 <0.0002
05/13/08 <0,0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
01/24/06 0.0004
11/07/06 0,0002
CP-12-2 05/30/07 0.0002
11/07/07 0.0003
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
01/25/06 <0.0002
11/07/06 <0.0002
MW-02-2 05/30/07 <0,0002
11/07/07 <0,0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
Marine sand
CP-01-3 01/24/06 0.0002
I 1/14/07 ; ._, 1:¥\,,·\:,, ·,:,kt\. . Q. 0023 i'.J<\f'1%:\t'.;Y'.',
CP-01-JR 05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
01/24/06 <0.0002
I 1/07/06 <0.0002
CP-03-3 05/30/07 <0.0002
I 1/07/07 <0.0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 0.0007!
01/25/06 <0.0002( i
11/08/06 <0.0002
CP-04-3 05/31/07 <0.0002
11/08/07 <0.0002
05/13/08 <0.0005
12/05/08 <0.0005 U
11/14/07 t .'i:'i't.f.M..;M,., 0.002 I ·:tt•; i;,;~~ ••:i,~
CP-08-3 05/18/08 I <0.0005
12/05/08 I <0.0005 U
<') Shaded values indicate an exccedence of the Nonh Carolina groundwater quality standard of
0 00105 mg/L (15A NCAC 2L 0202)
(ll Well samples CJ'-04-1 and CP-04.J were mislabeled during sampling; the sample labeled C!'-04-\
in the field and in the laboratory repon was actually Cl'-04-J and vice versa
<=concentration less than the Quantitation l.imit
U'-The compound was analyied for, but was nm detected at or above the Method repo,ting limit (MRI.)
/WT N,mh Cardino, Inc. I /Jomwr }'oper Compuny, IJ.C
!vfrmi1or111g R<'port
OU-3 • Former Ch/ur-sne !'!om An•u
I 1Wp(/YI.V'J7100-DJJ 71 'iJJ',O!)(JJ/ I /dJ.()(}1.\"f.S 12 January 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3
Historical Groundwater Monitoring Field Parameters
Alluvial auuifer water table)
01/24/06
11/07/06
MW-018 05/30/07
11/07/07
5/14/2008
12/5/2008
01/25/06
11/08/06
11108-07
05/31/07
05/14/08
12/5/2008
01/24/06
11/07/06
Cl'-03-1 05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/5/2008
01/25/06
! 1/08/06
Cl'-04-1 05/3 1/07
11/08/07
05/14/08
12/5/2008
01/25/06
11/08/06
CP-05-1 05/3)/07
11/08/07
05/14/08
12/5/2008
01/25/06
11/07/06
CP-07-1 05/30/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/5/2008
01/25/06
11/07/06
CP-08-1 05/30/07
l 1/08/07
05/13/08
12/5/2008
01/24/06
l 1/08/06
CP-09-1 05/31/07
l 1/08/07
05/!4/08
12/5/2008
01/24/06
11/08/06
CP-10-1 05/31!07
l 1/08/07
05/!4/08
! 2/5/2008
01/24/06
11/07/06
CP-11-1 05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
! 2/5/2008
H.MT North Carolina, Inc. I Domtar l'apa Company. U.C:
Moniluri11g /?.epun
OU-3 • FormaChlorine Plum Art•a
/.1Wp<;Yl.'J'J110().0j/ 1 /WJIUl/05 I 1 /Vl-OUl.\U
7.82
0.00
2.68
0.14
0.12
0.21
5.10
0.10
0.31
2.56
0.67
0.79
9.90
0.00
2.99
0.24
0.89
2.9
7.63
138
4.06
1.20
3.7
3.98
5.45
0.13
2.69
0.39
0.26
0.55
3.13
0.00
3.18
0.34
0.37
0.51
8.79
5.26
6.59
4.45
4.46
3.6
7.34
0.15
3.38
0.28
0,68
0.88
6.20
3.49
3.3
0.77
0.91
1.59
6.87
0.00
2.99
0.34
0.91
0.57
7.29 644
7.12 744
7.09 519
7.26 561
7.35 636
586
6.92 786
6.30 900
6.83 908
6.36 97
6.92 854
6.77 786
7.52 321
6.69 810
6.82 298
7.28 600
7.35 561
6.77 570
7.09 1257
7.80 1490
6.68 1790
8.65 1355
8.01 1501
7.44 1265
8.78 1033
9.50 1570
8.71
9.79 425
9.72 619
9.23 727
7.43 980
7.16 1390
7.17 1360
7.58 1306
7.72 1182
7.74 !035
9.22 392
8.56 900
8.61 601
9.33 459
9.05 638
7.84 263
6.94 905
6 34 960
6.35 661
6.92 889
7.05 845
6 55 910
6.98 694
6.74 940
6 55 714
7.27 834
7.65 284
7.3 606
6.79 422
6.05 568
5.84 466
6.34 571
6.37 549
6.37 631
13
l 6.4
22.0 2.1
20.88 0.78
23.47 0.67
19.83 1.17
20.23 1.96
22.1 45.5
21.8 11.0
22.91 5.17
20.11 5.44
19.63 4.23
20.21 5.40
! 2.4 7.7
20.2 3.2
19.24 1.96
21.6 0.59
17.34 2.03
14.46 2.77
22.1 11.0
21.1 41.2
21.19 5. I 8
22.31 5.16
20.89 252
17.87 10.5
22.1 31.9
20.5 54.1
21.8 I 46.1
21.09 192
20.76 138
16.57 83.9
22.! 1.6
23.5 6.7
21.04 1.32
23.68 17.9
20.56 4.8
20.73 1.48
21.4 17.0
22.2 60.1
25.7 14.8
19.51 8.76
21.89 4.6
21.07 7.25
20.1 3.1
22.6 3.6
20.8 0.64
22.88 0.42
I 8.77 2.32
21.11 2.92
20.1 1.9
21.7 0.6
22.28 1.49
21.1 0.99
21.)4 9.75
20.l l 2.88
16.9 2.6
23.1 1.7
19.77 l.86
24.35 8,08
17 98 5.89
20.94 3.51
Jamwry 2()09
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3
llislorical Groundwater Monitoring Field Parnmctcrs
-_\r'I_ WEl,6 ~J:&?XYGEN~!{ JJ.(;QNDUCl'IVIT\'.;_t MPERATIJRJi: lTU_RJJIDITY1~ ;)111\f;~m!RII';iJ/1i§l;'§I'y~u:t!~i11111(1\t[si'fs'ffi~t'¥;i~'~'ZMl't,Ji_r[,,ii
~ .···<1Ct•' r, 1 1'~"'"'.lt'"J· t"11,!;ft\':ii,:il\;;/'t(';;;-;,,. • ,;<l'.t:lT"-1!,'\v'. •-w~ ":!P . .,..,>c'( 1.-t, '~. , _. ~X-?.:;,.~,(mWL)ic.~~ --~ r,;;._,,c,i(µS/(m)t· :ti i -~1~0,,1t:0l; f~(NTOL0, _,,.,
01/24/06
11/07/06
CP-12-1 05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/5/2008
01/25/06
11/08/06
CP-13-1 05/31/07
11/08/07
05/14/08
12/5/2008
Alluvial aquifer (water table)
01/25/06
11/08/06
CP-14-1 05/31/07
11/08/07
05/14/08
12/5/2008
CP-15-1 01/25/06
01/25/06
11/07/06
MW-02 05/30/07
11/07/07 r 05/13/08
1 12/5/2008
Allm·ial :wuifcr -20 ft clcvationi
01/24/06
11/07/06
CP-01-2 05/30/07
I l/08itl7
05/13/08
12/5/2008
01/25/06
11/08/06
Cl'-02-2 05/31/07
11/08/07
05/14/08
l 2/5/2008
01/24/06
11/07/06
CP-03-2 05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/5/2008
01/25/06
11/08/06
CP-04-2 05/31/07
11/08/07
05/14/08
12/5/2008
01/25/06
11/08/06
CP-05-2 05/31/07
11/08/07
05/14/08
12/5/2008
01/25/06
l\/07/06
Cl'-07-2 05/30/07
l 1/08/07
05/13/08
12/5/2008
!WT Narth Carolina, Inc. I Domiar !'aper Company, I.LC
Monitormg lkporl
OU-3. Former Chlorine /'Inn/ Areu
/, \Wpt;l'I.11' fl"l(l().0,/ 7110) 1000'1 7 /OJ-001-1'/S
5.33 6.72
0.00 6.32
3.11 6.20
0.3 6.50
0.52 6.60
0.49 5.71
6.02 7.15
0.18 6.90
2.74 6.59
0.29 7.21
0.4 7.29
0.5 7.2
5.!8 6.80
0.13 6,76
2.44 6.38
0.36 6.81
0.96 6,84
0.82 6.74
6.0 6 33
5.00 622
3.05 6.12
6.84 5.91
1.58 6.23
4.30 6.66
4.IO 6.42
5.37 7 01
0.00 6.98
2.64 6.76
0.14 7.26
0.3 7.19
0.32 7.15
7.11 6.17
0.00 6.10
2.61 6.16
0.17 6.65
0.53 6.71
0.45 6.62
7.25 7 03
0.00 6.87
2.79 6 37
0.!8 6.87
0.68 6.83
0.71 7,06
4.31 5.83
0.00 6.09
2.6 5.65
0.2 5,99
0.6 6.03
0.56 5.95
5.65 6.24
0.00 6.69
2.5 6.04
0.18 6.72
0.28 6.8
0.5 6.66
4.20 6.61
0.00 6.82
2.66 6.62
0.13 6.98
0.25 6.86
0,26 7.13
14
607 17.5 19.7
900 21.9 8.0
671 20.84 2.82
664 2302 5.28
727 19.29 4.09
676 21.16 9.95
897 21.9 22.8
900 23.0 13.9
685 22.81 2.62
580 24.07 3.7
723 22.9 22.2
562 23.6 6.4
! 196 21.6 144.0
1440 23.0 18.3
1300 21.14 10.4
1178 24.18 21.9
I 153 21.4 40.5
1021 23, l 17,8
374 21.8 36.9
432 22.1 3.7
900 21.0 NM
599 20.81 3.1
502 22.21 2.27
735 20.16 13.3
569 18.42 1.22
633 19.5 \I
840 19.9 1.4
511 19.84 0.4
552 20.2 0.51
566 20.11 0.57
536 20.15 1.56
2735 22.1 12.0
2470 19.7 8.1
!780 !9.47 0.64
1114 !9.91 0.48
!06] 19.97 0.94
631 19.56 2.75
843 17.8 ! 1.0
900 ! 9.7 45.3
688 18.59 8.52
625 20.01 4.26
873 18.29 2.38
725 19.47 2,76
2339 22.1 4.1
1480 2!.0 2.2
1290 20.33 0.28
1284 21.02 2.46
1397 20.70 0.61
1423 20.77 1.72
1406 22.1 38.3
910 21.0 2.0
874 20.48 0.57
810 21.14 0.55
966 20.8 I.OJ
840 20.94 1.23
934 22.l 16,6
900 2L8 4.7
1000 21 0.63
658 22.03 0.36
837 21.3 0.7
503 21.98 1.05
Jmiuury 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3
Historical Groundwater Monitoring Field Parameters
--~u,sso,:vi:o~ ¢•"-,~tOXYG!i:N~~ ·m; {.im~~~i:f-0~~),;
01/25/06
l 1/07/06
CP-08-2 05/30/07
11/08/07
05/13/08
12/5/2008
0l/24i06
11/08/06
CP-09-2 05/31/07
11/08/07
05/14/08
12/5/2008
01/24/06
I !/08/06
CP-10-2 05/31/07
11/08/07
05/14/08
12/5/2008
Alluvial 111111ifcr (-20 fl elevation)
01/24/06
11/07/06
CP-11-2 05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/5/2008
01/24/06
11/07/06
CP-12-2 05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/5/2008
01/25/06
11/07/06
MW-02-2 05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
12/5/2008
Marinesund
CP-01-3 01/24/06
11/14/07
CP-01-3R 05/14/08
12/5/2008
01/24/06
11/07/06
CP-03-3 05/30/07
11/07/07
05/13/08
! 2/5/2008
01/25/06
11/08/06
CP-04-3 05/31/07
11/08/07
05/14/08
12/5/2008
I !/I 4/07
CP-08-3 05/13/08
12/5/2008
R/'.{J' North Cam/ma, Inc. I /Jomwr Poper Company, U.C
Monttormg Report
(J(/.J. Former Chforme !'font Arca
/ IWpGl'LV'JNK>.()J/7/\QNJ(J(}J/7101..()()1-\lS
5.14
0.00
2.81
0.14
0.32
0.34
7.23
0.00
3.02
0.2
0.69
0.38
7.02
0.00
2.49
0.21
0.52
0.43
6.39
0.00
2.94
0.23
0.37
0.29
6.02
0.00
2.85
0.19
0.28
0.3
4.66
0.00
2.74
0.27
0.59
0.2
4.94
1.03
0.09
0.25
6.51
0.00
2.89
0.45
0.56
0.88
5.02
0.00
2.36
0.14
0.19
0.37
0.18
0.08
0.3
ciFfi_;~\I CTIV(T'i~ r
) J:~J ,"
6,80 420
7.45 537
6.93 425
7.17 542
7.26 542
7.34 456
6.27 239
6.06 242
5.92 2370
6.37 1987
6.43 1786
6.39 1540
6.19 1851
6.04 1620
5.83 1500
6.21 1310
6.25 1146
6.14 1165
7.42 911
7.31 90
6.82 737
7.38 772
7.49 769
7.61 740
7.15 949
7.00 900
6.79 713
7.38 553
7.49 516
7.17 463
7.25 412
6.95 614
6.58 413
7.41 488
7.48 539
7.54 565
7.05 1480
6.98 13920
7 03 !5310
6.93 12830
7.00 1402
7.13 1390
6.77 15600
6.93 13940
6.91 14230
7.11 13020
6.95 2299
7.08 765
6.52 13100
6,80 14710
6.91 15520
6.76 14200
7.49 40650
7.04 5492
7.07 6732
15
-''1
URBID '))"'0/\'
'' ,, dNTU),.
21.4 12.5
21.8 3.2
20.94 0.44
22.17 0.28
20.99 0.77
2302 0.92
20.1 23.7
20.4 2.4
19.35 0.42
20.66 0.46
19.19 0.79
20.18 1.61
20.1 17.4
21.6 1.2
21,04 0.75
21.61 0.27
20.56 1.04
21.05 l.72
I 8.9 4.9
20.9 2.3
18.7 1.28
21.51 0.61
18.43 0.87
20.92 !.28
20.S 73
21.7 9 5
20.92 0.3
22.!2 0.58
20.92 1.05
22.03 1.13
22.1 3.0
20.8 0.3
20.84 0.31
21.43 0.29
20.48 0.62
20.77 0.64
18.7 4.4
21.47 8.2
19.49 0.74
18.82 1.98
18.1 9.0
18.9 55.0
19.17 6
19.22 0.92
l R.98 4.65
18.82 8.19
22.1 23.0
20.7 1.9
21.12 3.66
20.64 1.43
21.05 1.03
20.35 3.01
23.3! 12.9
2 l.23 0.54
21.21 1.14
)0111111,y 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area A-1
I:\ WPG VI.IP J7\00-05 I 71\03'R000517103-002.IX)C
Appendix A
Analytical Data
January 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9143 Philips llighway, Suite 200
December 29, 2008
Heather Smith
RMT Inc.
30 Patewood Drive
Jacksonville,. ll 32256
Suite I 00 Patewood Plaza One
Greenville, SC 29615-3535
[phone] [phone] fax
An Employee -Owned Cornpan-
Service Request No: J0805912
Laboratory Results for: Domtar O&M Sampling for the Former Chlorine Plant/5171.03
Dear Heather:
Enclosed are the results of the sample(s) submitted to our laboratory on December 5, 2008. For
your reference, these analyses have been-assigned our service request number .10805912.
All analyses-were performed according to our laboratory's quality assurance program. The test
results meet requirements of the NELAP standards except as noted in the case narrative report.
All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
(CAS) is not responsible for use of less than the complete report. Results apply only to the items
submitted to the laboratory for analysis and individual items (samples) analyzed, as listed in the
report. In accordance to the NELAC 2003 Standard, a statement on the estimated uncertainty of
measurement of any quantitative analysis will be supplied upon request.
Please contact me if you have any questions. My extension is 4408. You may also contact me
via email at [e-mail].
Respectfully submitted,
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc,
Torn Kissinger
Project Manager
Laboratory Manager: Greg Jordan
Quality Assurance Officer: Kathy Brungard
Page I of __ /_i_· __
CAS Jacksonville is NELAC-accredited by the State of Florida, #£82502 valid through 6/30/09.
Other state accreditations include: Georgia, 11958 valid through 6130109; Louisiana, 1102086 valid
through 6/30/09, Texas, ffT/04704197-06-TXvalid rhrough 5131/09; Norrh Carolina, 11527 valid
rhrough 12/31/08; Sourh Carolina, 1/9602100 l valid through 6/30/09.
"·'· 1111
NEL/\P Accrediled ACIL Seal of Excellence Award
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client: ·
Project:
Sample Matrix:
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
Domtar Paper Company, LLC Service Request No.:
Domtar O&M Sampling for the Former Chlorine PlantDate Received:
water
CASE NARRATIVE
10805912
12/5/08
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
(CAS). This report contains analytical results for samples designated for Tier II data deliverables, including results of
QC samples analyzed from this delivery group. When appropriate to the procedure, method blank results have been
reported with each analytical test. Analytical procedures performed by the lab arc validated in accordance with
NELAC standards. Parameters that are included in the NELAC Fields of Testing but are not included in the lab's
NELAC accreditation arc identified in the discussion of each analytical procedure.
Sample Receipt
36 water samples were received for analysis at Columbia Analytical Services on 12/5/08. The samples were received
in good condition and consistent with the accompanying chain or custody form. Samples arc refrigerated at 4±2°C
upon receipt at the !ab except for aqueous samples designated for metals analyses, which were stored at room
temperature.
Mercury by CV AA
No problems were observed with this delivery group.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
Data Qualifiers
Inorganic Data
• The result is an outlier. See case narrative .
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. See case narrative.
B The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result.
E The result is an estimated amount because the value exceeded the instmment calibration range.
J The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL.
U The compound was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non-detect") at or above the MRL/MDL.
Z Too many colonies were present (TNTC). The numeric value represents the filtration volume.
i The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to matrix interference.
X See case narrative.
Metals Data
* The result is an outlier. Sec case narrative.
# The control limit criteria are not applicable. See case narrative.
B The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater thun or equal to the MDL.
E The reported value is estimated because of the presence of matrix interference.
M The duplicate injection precision was not met.
N The Matrix Spike sample recovery is not within control limits. See case narrative.
S The result was determined by Method of Standard Additions (MSA).
U The compound was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non-detect") at or above the MRL/MDL.
W The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits, while sample absorbance is less than
50% of spike absorbance.
The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to matrix interference.
X Sec case narrative.
+ The correlation coefficient for the MSA is less than 0.995.
•
#
A
B
C
D
E
J
N
p
u
X
F
L
1-1
0
y
z
Organic Data
The result is an outlier. Sec case narrative.
The control limit criteria are not applicable. See case narrative.
The tentatively identified compound· is a suspected a!dol-condensation product.
The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result.
The analyte was qualitatively confirmed using GC/MS techniques, pattern recognition, or by comparing to
historical data.
The reported result is from a dilution.
The result is an estimated amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range.
The result is an estimated concentration that is less than the MRL but greater than or equal to the MDL.
The result is presumptive. The analyte was tentatively identified, but a confirmation analysis was not
performed.
The GC or HPLC confirmation criteria were exceeded. The relative percent difference is greater than 40%
between the two analytical results (25% for CLP Pesticides)
The compound was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non~detect") at or above the MRL/MDL.
The MRL/MDL has been elevated due to a chromatographic interference.
Sec case narrative.
Petroleum Hydrocarbon Specific
The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample matches the elution pattern of the calibration standard.
The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates
the presence of a greater amount of lighter molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution rnttern indicates
the presence ufa greater amount of heavier molecular weighi constituents than the calibration standard.
The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles an oil, but does not match the calibration standard.
The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product eluting in approximately the
correct carbon range, but the elution pattern does not match the calibration standard.
The chromatographic fingerprint does not resemble a petroleum product.
3
I
I
I ASTM
A2LA
CARB
I CAS Number
CFC
CFU
I DEC
DEQ
I DHS
DOE
DOH
'
EPA
ELAP
GC
I GC/MS
LUFT
M
1· MCL
I MDL
MPN
MRL
I NA
NC
NCASI
I ND
NIOSH
I PQL
RCRA
SIM
I TPH
tr
I
I
I
I
I
Acronyms
American Society for Testing and Materials
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
California Air Resources Board
Chemical Abstract Service registry Number
Chlorofluorocarbon
Colony-Forming Unit
Department of Environmental Conservation
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Health Services
Department of Ecology
Department of Health
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
Gas Chromatography
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Leaking Underground Fuel Tank
Modified
Maximum Contaminant Level is the highest permissible concentration of a substance
allowed in drinking water as established by the USEPA.
McU1od Detection Limit
Most Probable Number
Method Reporting Limit
Not Applicable
Not Calculated
National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement
Not Detected
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Practical Quantitation Limit
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Selected Ion Monitoring
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Trace level is the concentration of an analyte that is less than the PQL but greater than or
equal to the MDL
4
I Client: RMT Inc.
Project: Domtar O&M Sampling for the Former Chlorine Plant/5171.03
I
I
I·
I
I
I.'
I .
I
I
I
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
SAMPLE#
J0805912-001
10805912-002
10805912-003
10805912-004
10805912-005
10805912-006
10805912-007
10805912-008
10805912-009
108059 I 2-0 I 0
10805912-011
10805912-012
10805912-013
10805912-014
10805912-015
10805912-016
10805912-017
10805912-018
10805912-019
10805912-020
'J0805912-021
10805912-022
10805912-023
10805912-024
10805912-025
10805912-026
10805912-027
10805912-028
10805912-029
10805912-030
10805912-031
10805912-032
10805912-033
10805912-034
10805912-035
10805912-036
I P,·intcu 12/29/08 I 0:51
SAMPLE CROSS-REFERENCE
CLIENT SAMPLE ID
MW-2-2
MW-2
CP-11-1
CP-11-2
CP-03-1
CP-03-2
Cl'-03-3
CP-12-1
CP-12-2
DU-08401
CP-08-1
FBLK-08401
CP-08-2
CP-08-3
CP-07-1
CP-07-2
MW-lB
CP-01-3R
FBLK-08402
DU-08402
CP-01-2
Cl'-02-1
CP-02-2
CP-09-1
CP-09-2
CP-10-1
CP-10-2
CP-04-1
CP-04-2
DU-08403
CP-04-3
CP-05-1
FBLK-08403
CP-05-2
CP-13-1
CP-14-1
Sample Summary
Service Request: 10805912
DATE TIME
1215108 09:55
1215/08 10:30
1215/08 10:50
12/5/08 11:00
1215/08 12:25
1215/08 12:40
12/5108 12:55
1215/08 13:25
1215/08 13:35
1215/08 00:00
1215/08 14: 15
1215/08 14:20
1215108 14:25
12/5/08 15:25
12/5/08 15:45
12/5/08 15:55
12/5108 16:20
12/5108 10:40
12/5/08 09:35
12/5/08 00:00
1215/08 10:50
12/5/08 11: 15
12/5/08 11 :25
12/5/08 11:40
12/5/08 11 :55
12/5/08 12:10
12/5/08 12:25
12/5/08 14:45
12/5/08 15:05
12/5/08 00:00
12/5/08 15:20
12/5/08 15:40
12/5/08 15:45
1215108 15:55
12/5/08 16: 10
1215108 16:25
5
Pagelorl
I Client:
Project: I Sample Matrix:
I. Analysis Method:
I Sample Name
MW-2-2
.• MW-2
CP-11-1
CP-11-2
I CP-03-1
CP-03-2
CP-03-3
', ~~~-~r;O I
I ~~it~8401 _
-CP-08-2
I CP-08-3
, CP-07-1
CP-07-2
•. MW-1B I C,P-0 l-3R
FBLK-08402
-DU-08402 I CP-01-2
· CP-02-1
CP-02-2 I CP-09-1
· CP-09-2
CP-10-1
I ~::~t~ ·
CP-04-2
I DU-08403
CP-04-3
CP-05-1
I FBLK-?8403
CP-05-2
CP-13-1
I CP-14-1
Method 131ank
Method Blank
I
Comments:
COLUMBIA ANALYTJCALSERVICES, INC,
Analytical Report
Domtar Industries
Domtar O&M Sampling for the Former Chlorine Plant/5171.03
Water
245, I
Lab Code
108059 I 2-00 I
J08059 I 2-002
J08059 I 2-003
J08059 I 2-004
]0805912-005
J0805912-006
·····-·····--·-·--J0805912-007
J08059 I 2-008
J0805912-009
Mercury, Total
Result Q
ND u
ND u
ND u
--··--··----·-------·-. ND u
ND u
ND u
. ---· _,_
0,71
ND u
ND u
MRL
0.50
0.50
0,50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
···-·--------··------------·-------·· ---]0805912-010 ND U 0,50
J0805912-0I I 0,70 0.50
10805912-012 ND U 0.50
--·-----·-------· ... -·-· --------·------J0805912-013 ND U 0,50
J0805912-014 ND U 0.50
10805912-015 0.50 ND u
10805912-016
10805912-0 I 7
)0805912-018
J08059 I 2-0 I 9
J08059 I 2-020
)0805912-021
10805912-022
10805912-023
10805912-024
10805912-025
)0805912-026
10805912-027
------
ND u
LS
ND u
ND u
1,3
2.2
ND u
ND u
ND u
....... --------------·--
ND u
ND u
ND u
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
Service Rcq uest: 10805912
Date Collected: 12/5/08 1520
Date Received: 12/5/08
Units: µg/L
Basis: NA
Dilution Date Date
Factor Extracted Analyzed
12/22/08 12/22/08 16: I I
12/22/08 12/22/08 16:20
12/22/08 12/22/08 I 6:22
12/22/08 12/22/08 16:23
12/22/08 12/22/08 16:24
12/22/08 12/22/08 I 6:25
12/22/08 12/22/08 16:27
12/22/08 12/22/08 16:28
I 12/22/08 12/22/08 16:29
-------·--···-. ----·-----· -··· I 12/22/08 12/22/08 16:30
12/22/08 12/22/08 16:32
12/22/08 12/22/08 16:38
---. ----------· -·----------·
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
-·· ---..... ------·---·-----·-· 12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08 16:40
12/22/08 I 6:41
12/22/08 16:42
12/22/08 16:43
12/22/08 16:45
12/22/08 16:46
12/22/08 16:47
12/22/08 16:51
12/22/08 17:03
12/22/08 16:56
12/22/08 17:06
12/22/08 17:08
12/22/08 17:09
12/22/0817:10
12/22/08 17: 12 ................. -------. --....... _ .. ____________ ........
)0805912-028
)0805912-029
)0805912-030
7.8 0.50 12/22/08
ND U 0.50 12/22/08
ND U 0,50 12/22/08
10805912-031
]0805912-032
J08059 I 2-033
)0805912-034
10805912-035
)0805912-036
ND
7,9
ND
... -·----·-------·-
ND
ND
ND
u
u
u
u
u .................. "' -...... ·-----------·---~
10805912-Mlll ND U
l0805912-MB2 ND U
0,50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
.... -----· .. --------
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08
12/22/08 17: 13
12/22/08 17: 15
12/22/08 17: I 6
12/22/08 17: 17
12/22/08 17:24
12/22/08 17 :25
12/22/08 17:27
12/22/08 17:28
12/22/08 17:29
12/22/08 I 6:07
12/22/08 16:52
1------------
"'\ Printed 1/6/09 13:57 I \linf1ow2\star!ims\Lim . ._Reps\Analytica1Rcport.ipt
Form IA 6
SupcrSet Reference· 08-0000090313 rev 00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Clicul:
Project .'\lame:
J'ruject Numl.icr:
:Vbtrix:
Snm)llc Na111e:
!,ab Cnde:
['rep
Analric Me!hn1J
Men.::1ry • Ml:THOI)
COLUMBIA ANALYTICAL SERVlCfS, INC
QA/QC Report
Domtar Jmlustries
Domtar O&:\l Samµling for the Former Chlorine Plant:) 171 :o3
5171.03
WATER
MW-2-2
.10805912-00 I
M,llrix Spike/M<1trix Spike Duplii;ate Surnnrnry
Tnt,11 ;V[c:,ils
JD805912-00 IS
Service Request:
Date Collected:
D:itc Received:
D;ltc Extraclcd:
Dnte A11:1ly·Lcd:
10805912
12/05/2008
12/05/2008
12/22/2008
12/211200S
U11i1s: l1giL
Basis: N/A
u;., R.:c
.-\nalysis Spike Lev~I Sample SpilH: Rcs11lt
iVIS DMS
l'crccnl Recovery ..\cccptanrc Rc.'illll
Mcthnd iVIHL MS DMS Rcs11I! MS D1VJS JiPD Limi!s ,r-..:ntc~
245. I 0.50 S.OIJ 5.00 0.09 4.63 4.76 92 9J 2 70 -130
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COLUMlllA ANALYTJCAL SERVICES, !NC
Q,\/QC Rtpon
C!icu(: D01111a1 lndustrit:s
Projccl N:1111e: Donn:1r O&M Sampling frn the Former Chlorine Pl:im-~ 171 Jl3
Prn,icct .'lumber: 5171.03
M.itri.-.:: WATER
S:1111plc 1-.:111nc:
Lah Collt':
!'rep
;\ 11:ilr1c /\•!ethod
Mercury METHOD
CP-l)S-1
JUS05912-0I I
An:dysis
:'Vldl1od
245.1
Mf{L
0.50
M:Hri.x Spik!;'/Mn1ri.'{ Spike Dupltc:11e Summary
Torn! tvkl<1I::;
)0805912-011 S
Spil,c Leve! Sample .':ipikl' Hcrnll
MS D1YIS Result :VIS DMS
S.00 S.00 0.70 5.J~ '-1.36
Scrvicc Req11cst:
Dali.: Cllllt:ctcd:
Dntc Received;
Dntc E.~(r:ictcd:
Date Analyzed:
JU~05912
12/05/2008
12/05/200)
12/12/200S
12/22/2008
Units· ug/l.
U:1sis: NIA
Pcn:cnl Hcrnvcry
MS OMS
n S3
Rl'D
9
'1/n Hee
Acccptnncc Hcstdl
Limits Note.,
70 -130
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COLUMJ31A ANALYTJCALSERVICicS, INC
Qt-\/QC Report
Client: Domtur lndl1:-trie:;
Project N:1mc: Domtar O&!'-·l Sampling for tht Porm(;r Chlori11~ Pinnt 5171 .(_)}
!'rnjcct Numlicr: 5171.03
M:11rix: Wi\TER
Sample N:11nc:
I ,:11) Codt:
Cl'-02-1
)0805912-022
!V!,nrix Spike/Matrix Spike D11plic:1tc Suminmy
Tot:i! Mc.:1,11s
JIJS059 l 2-022S
Service l{cqucst: JU8051.J 12
D:Hc Collected: 12/05/2008
Datc Rcccind: !2/05/2008
Dntc E.,1rnc1cil: ) 2!~2!:?.008
Dare i-\11:dp.cd: l 2/22/2008
Units: ug/L
lLi.,;is: NIA
'1/., Rec
Pn·p t\11:dy,i.s Spike LL'l'CI S:1111plc Spil;c lkwU l'en:c11I i<ccuvcry :\cctp!ancc
,\11,llytc Method Mc1h11d :\'!JU_ M:-:i DMS Hcsu!t MS OMS 1Y!S DMS !U'D Limits
tvlerc11ry .rvlETHOU 2,1s.1 0.5(1 5.00 5.00 0.23 4.95 5. 10 94 97 70 -130
9
I~ c, 11 I I
NiJtC~
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COLUMlllA ANALYTICAL SERVICES, (NC
Qt\/QC Repor'.
Client: Domta1· [ndustries
Project N:1mc: Domtar O&~-! Sa111µling fur the Fonner Chlorine Pl;111r.5 ! 71.UJ
Projci.:t Number: 517 l .OJ
:Yh1fri_,: W1\TEY
S:1111plc N:1111c:
L:1LJ Codl':
Cl'-04-1
J080:i9 J 2-0J l
M,11rix Spikt/i\tatrix Spike Duplic1.1te Summary
Totril t'vkt,1ls
JOS05912-03\S
Service Rcrp1cst: 10805912
Da(c Collected: 12/05/2008
D:ilc Hcccivcd: !2/05/2008
Dnrc E:1.tr:1ctcd: 12/22.1200~
Dalt An:llyzctl: l 2/2~:'J:0()~
U11ih: ug./1.
Basis: Nit\
J'rcp ,\11:1lysi.s
Au:ilylc .\'let hod ,\·!c(hod
Spilcc Level S:rn1 plc Spike l{l'.Slt!(
iVJS Di\:IS
l'crccnt Rcc1,vcry
'1/t, Rec
,\cccpcance l{cs11lt 1'VIHL MS D,\l!S Result :VIS OMS H.l'D Limi!s Nole~
Men.:ury METHOD ~4 5.1 O.:rn S.00 5.00 lJ 4.60 4.60 92 92 <! JO -I JO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client:
l'rojccl N:1111c:
l'rojcct Numlicr:
i\'!;111·i.x:
S:11uplc N:irnc:
Lib Cude:
.'\11:dyk
;\.IL'1'>:u1·~
Men:ury
COLU:V!llIA ANALYTICAL SEHVJCES, INC
QA/QC Report
Do:11t:1r lnciu':itri~s
Dorni:ir O&\·I S:1111pling for tli•..-:-rcirmer Chlori11c: Plant.'5171.0J
5 ! 7 l .UJ
W_1\Tl·:l\
L<1b C1)111rul S:1nipk
LCSS-1222
l'rep Ar1:1lysi,
Mc!hod rv!elhud
/vlETI-IOD 24). J
Ml::THOD 2•15. l
Laborntmy Control S:1rnpk Su111111ary
Ttl!:11 Mct,1ls
True
V:1li1c
5.00
5.00
Results
4.72
4.46
!'cn.:cut
i{l'Cnvcry
90
89
Service Rcq11cst: J08059 ! 2
Date Collected: N/A
D:11c Received: NIA
Dn(c Extracted: 12/22/2008
Date :\na!yzcd: 12/22/2003
C,\S l'cn:cnt
Recovery
;\cccpl:111cc
Li111ils
85 -I 15
85 • 115
Units: ug/L
l:l:ds: NIA
l{c.sult
Nute~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1' I
Columbia Analytical Services, Inc.
Cooler Rccctpt and Preservation ·Form
Client -----~Q_t'}j+[ Service Request# __ ____::r-e:,&i.S'i/.2:----
PlOJcCl ---<S)()_M, ___ 1:::i
Coole1 received on / Z--_!ij~Y
COURJER: CAS UPS ~DEX) OHL
and opened on r~--/4-sy 71J ,-IG~-
CLIENT _T_r_ae_r_in__,g"--;# __ "----==-------1
I Were custody seals on outsid;-of cooler? Yes ~
2 Yes No
No 3
4
5
6
7
Were seals intact, signed and dated?
Were custody papers properly filled out?
Temperature of cooler(s) upon receipt {Should be 4 +/. 2 degrees C) ::s '~ Yes'")
8
l)
10
11
12
13
14
Correct Temperature'/
Were Ice or Ice Packs present
Diel all bottles arrive in goocl condition (unbroken, etc ... )'l
Were all bottle labels complete (sample ID, preservation, etc ... )'1
Diel all bottle l.'1lJe!s and tags agree with custody papers?
Vi/r,,:,re the correct bottles used for the tests imlicutcd?
We,~ ·di of(l,e prescrwd bottks received with the apµropri;lle presi;;rvntive?
HN03 pH<2 H2S04 pfl<2 ZnAc2/NnOH pH>9 NnOH pH> 12
1'r~.,;,:,,,111vc additirrn~ IHJ\ul below
Were all samples received wilh111 analysis holcling times?
\Ve1c VO/\ vials checked for abs-:nce ol"air bubbies? lfprcscnt1 note below
Where did the bottles originate?
Manuf. Lot# or CAS
---/ '
1 Yes
1 Yes
l Yes l ' \: Yes\
HCI pi-1<2
(Yes)
res
{s:As)
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Client
Sample ID Reagent Chem 10 ml added lnititials
Additional comments and/or explanation of all discrepancies noted above:
Client approval to run samples if discrepancies noted: Date:,~
NIA
NIA
NIA
N/A
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
NIA
(-;~
'----._)
--
t.,J
-----a!!!I ------
8o1rlc Code
7 ' s ,o 1 I I t2 ! !J 14 I 15 " " " I '9 20 " 22232425262728 30
(·M:,,,,rr~! !cc~am"t~•"oocm"t+•co,;c'+"'S;,"''c"''l''"'";."'"''r''"~c'""''+''c'"~"m'li-'2"5"~m7l"2"'';;;~c'!'i.1;","5;:":i"'\i-'"'""o~cm"'-i:"'c:'~crn"'+'c'o;;"c··c"·'l','"'"'"c"'''l""::c'"+"cc"Fcc''7-~---oc4-CC+-~:C'+~~Lc-; ,'f-''s;~''r'o;,"''t''s;t"·c'c;;'c''l--,,c;;'oc+'c""opcm"'+.:o:::c; ..-,aorr.l 500ml. SllflmlJ 1L " " p p p I p p G
P.'.~":H ';;r,1 HCI~ K2S0-
<2 :.'.NAc: <2 <2 <2
S:,rrrl,a;; . I
I
I
I
I I
I
I y ,. /
I
H?S0·11 HN0.3~/!aOlt rl!.1 fPSO-'-~':_ :,} .u•a >_'}~ :r~~ ,:~::::. ··>. ,. H2S0 HNO~ <li•~ <.2 ) >9 I ,.,2 ,~i~J <2 -<2 1~·,;, N7A N1A -N,;.· <2 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'NIA <2 <.> WA << Nit'
I I I· I I
I I I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
' I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I '
ti//\'"
I I I I n,:1 IL_!__L __ L_..L_...L_..J. __ L_..L_...JL_..L_..J. ___ L_L_...L_..J. __ L_...L __ L_L_..L..J._...L __ L..L...JL...L _ _L _ _J_ __ _J_ _ _J
--
- ------------------J-v&J 591)._
liM1. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
30 Patewood Drive, Suite 100, Patewood Plaza One, Greenville, SC 29615-3535
Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
Relinquished by (Signature)
Relinquished by (Signature) Dote/Time Received by (Signature)
Custody Seal: Present/ Absent !ntoct/No! Intact Seal #s
F-268 16/0J)
Filtered (Yes/No)
Preserved (Code)
WITH SA/v'i.PLES
D Flammob!e
D Corrosive
0 Highly Toxic
0 Other (list)
½'HITE--lABORATORY COPY
Comments:
PRESERVED CODES
A-NONE
B-HN03
C-H2SO•
D-NoOH
E-HCI
f-METHANOl
G-
Turn Around (circle one) Normal Rush
Report Due ___________ _
(For Lab Use Only)
Receipt Temp:
Temp Blank Y N
YELlOW-REPORT APPENDIX
Receipt pH
{Wet/ Metals)
PINK-SA!,1.PlER/SUBMITTER
---------- ---------
liMl CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
u,
30 Patewood Drive, Suite 100, Patewood Plaza One, Greenville, SC 29615-3535
Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
Project No. ) S 7 .D.::;, Proiect/Client:
lob No. Y,.'Q.Q.
Dote Time Sample Station ID
l
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
Dote/Time
Relinquished by (Signature) Dote/Time
R~linquished by (Signature) Date/Time
Custody Seal· Present/ Absent Intact/Not lntoct Seo) #s
F-268 (6/04)
GcJ
DT
Dote/Time
Preserved (Code)
HAZARDS ASSOCIATED
WITH SAMPLES
D Flammable
D Corrosive
0 Highly Toxic
0 Other (list)
¼'J--HTE-LABORA10RY COPY
Turn Around (circle one) Normal
PRESERVED CODES
A-NONE
B-HN03
C-H2S04
D-NaOH
E-HCI
f-METHANOL
G-
Ru.'.,h
Report Due ~-----------
(For Lab Use Only)
Receipt Temp:
Temp Blank Y N
YEl1OW-REPORT APPENDIX
Receipt pH
(We!/ Metals)
PINr(-SAMPlfR/SU6MITTf.R
-------------------
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD 76107
30 Patewood Drive, Suite 100, Patewood Plaza One, Greenville, SC 29615-3535 filte,ed {Yes/No) /4 / / / / / / / / Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] Preserved (Code) /µ._ / / / / / / / /
P,S(t 11. l) z I Pmject/Client: 1
~ '\t ,,,o N or PRESERVED CODES
Pcoiecth~o~eo:;[;'~n I tJ. s(f\ :-th ~ v"' A-NONE
" -"lc-"'c,. B-HN03 w " _o w ,,,~ C-H2SO~ E .!: o 0 X :::s-t Zc "" ~Ci D-NoOH
lab Na. y,()'o -a i ~ E-HCI £V o~ F-METHANOl Date Time Sample Station ID r o
Comments· G
IJ L1 IDSD cP-01-.--I (,1' y
/ I 11 S-CP-DJ.-I / '/
Jk)C C P-DJ -;::)_ I I\'
I IYt\ CP-t:f\ -1 I \
I I CS' rP-09-_, I y
IJID Cl)-J/\-1 I ,-'
I ,nc CP-1A-~ I \
\ I (.JllC ('D-t~-/ I 'X
IS~ cP-z:it -d-I '
--l'l\J-'f A4bZ I \ Y..
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
\ ~ 0 ,--,
SAM~ R,,li~f\Ji,hed 1)1{ ig ature) Date/Time ~~;J t ;Sig{j~ -DA Date/Time HAZARDS ASSOCIATED
t.J,-lJ-oA WITH SAMPLES Turn Around (circle one) Normal Rush
. .L,
Relinquis~ by (Signature) Dote/Time RecPi~ b~(Si~a!ure) Date/Tir;ne
0 Flammable Report Due
! evvvl , _, • ' I 0 Carro~ive (Fa, lab Use Only} ; ,. -I l/t y~ Highly Toxic , , _ , ,_,~_,___, .. •--~ , !1 J;{; Jk ~
Relinquished by (Signature) Dote/Time Received by (Signature) DothTime Receipt Temp· Receipt pH
0 Other (li~t) Temp B!ank y N (Wet/ Meto!s)
Custody Seal: Present/ Absent Intact/Not Intact Seal #s
f-268 (6/0A) WHfTE-lABORATORY COPY YEUQW-REPORT APPENDIX P!NK-SA.V,PLER/SUBMITTER
-------------------
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD _'>-..,,Sr,5':JtZ 7 6 1 0 8
30 Patewood Drive, Suite 100, Patewood Plaza One, Greenville. SC 29615-3535 f;lleced {Ye,/Noj /41 / / / / / / / / Phone [phone] • Fax [phone] Preserved {Code} / f-'-,,, / / / / / 7 7 7
ProtJ7 /, ~3, I Project/Cl;ent D \ ,,,o 01,,:ra r PRESERVED CODES ;:,.
P,ojrn~op:o;:[;;o; ~. ~ M ;-} r'\ 0"' A-NONE
" " <s-"'(5; B-HN03 ~ " ..0 0 e,'-, C-t-i1SO~ E -~ z ~ X ),--\<; D-NoOH
y,'01,_ °' ,:-0
Lob No. - 0 j "' E-HCI .EV
Date Time Sample Station ID ~o F-METHAl'-K)l
-Comments: G
I~ /j /Qt) C iJ-ti4-<-· \ (-.,/ ,', \
JCi..i'r C .:i-DS-1 I Gw \
I SWS FG,LV -02/-1 t3, I Dr Ii
I s,s;c::;-c P-1:lS-J I 6uJ I'{
\ I/, lti C P-13'-I ( ( '{
11,,JC C()-)4-/ I \ '!
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
\ ~ rv-
SAMPLER ReHnq i\~ by {i)t ti,,J Dote/lime ?;J ~;g~}=~ -Qt\ Dote/lime
HAZARDS ASSOCIATED
WfTH SAMPLES Turn Around {circle on€) Normal Rush
'-/-!-U -ti?-i 0 Flommob!e Report Due
Relinquished by Signature} Date/Time R··-'· _ _, ~ (/Lnotvre) / ;;,~me --;~,. ~I -wq, 0 Corrosive (For Lob Use Only)
h D Highly To:,;ic
k .... nquished by {Signature) Date/Time Received by (Signature) . Dote/Time Receipt Temp: Receipt pH
0 Other {list) Temp Blank y N (Wet/Metols)
Custody Seel: Present/ Absent Intact/Not Intact Seo! #s
F·268 (6/0A) WHITE-LABORATORY COPY YEUOW-REPQRT APPENDIX PINK-SAMPLER/SU6NIITTER
--
00
-----.. --------Sample Collection Checklist for Weyerhaeuser Former Landfill No.
Project Domtar
Project Number: 5171.03
Sample Date: Week of 12/1/2008
Type of Turnaround: Standard
QC Package: NIA
December 2008
CAS Labs
9143 Philips Highway, Suite 200
Jacksonville, FL 32256
Contact: Tom KissiriQer
904-739-22n tab
904-739-2011 fax
RMT Project Manager: Mike Parker
AMT Project Contact: Heather Smith
AMT Alternate Contacts: Travis Tarbet
Work Order Prepared By/Dale: HHS 11/6/2008
Work Order OCed By/Date:
i;:ps;;;,::::;::;;-::n::i"\:\:::i:;~}
0
i~~~lrfi?i:~J'I~j;:1n~~:~~t:;i~;i",.'"'~~.;-.-,.~: __ -::;;\:"t"·.~ .!;:,.'.,~l~~:;~;;l~i~P;i~~~;;i":"i~~'"-~~;~~\"~~•Ft"!":"'}~:~r".:c,cJ;:,}"• """"""'"=
\o•·:'..·::,,STATIONat<,(~>;a:S .;,csi:-&Welf.De th·;t:?.:'./ ~,::MERC_UR)'I!,. )~TEMP.ER~l:URE't,.!,_
MW-1B 11 x x
CP-01-2 30 1 x x
CP-01-3
CP-01-3R
CP-02-1
CP-02-2
CP-04-2
CP-04-3
CP-05-1
CP-05-2
CP-06-1
CP-06-2
54.8 X
12.1 X
30.2 X
11.5 X
30.2 X
50 X
10.8 X 30 X
CP-07-1 12 x
CP-07-2 30 x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Abandoned 3/08
1 _'7C'JPS:-Oiji8(:·'i-1_7 __ --,;12;;'.;;-5--+--x:----+----=----j-----------------J
GROUNDWATER <---~Ci'J'P~-O~B3·2;--t---f3~0~.8;,-_,f--_~x--+---~---+------------------~ I CP-08·3 50.98 x
X
X
X
CP-03-1 12.2 x
CP-03 2 29.5 x
CP-03-3 51 x
CP-09-1 12 x
C0-09·2 28 x
CP-10-1 12 x
CP-10-2 28 x
CP-11-1 14 x
CP-11-2 28 x
CP-12·1 12 x
CP-12-2 27 x
CP-13-1 15 x
CP-14-1 16 X
CP-15-1
MW-2 13 x
MW-2-2 27 x
Analytical Method: Analyze for total mercury using USEPA method 245.1.
Sample Co_nlainers: 125 ml ultra clean glass bottle with HNO3 preseNative. Volume: minimum 125 ml
Collect 3 field duplicates and 3 field blanks
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Abandoned 3/08
X
X
RMT. Inc./ Weyerti..euser Company ,,~,,-t5,>f'.(•;••11....,,.w,;, ,,.
---
M.:.y2008
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine }'!ant Area B-1
/:\ Wl'G Vl.V'JJ',00-05 I 71 \OJV/0005 J 7103-002. /XJC
Appendix B
Photographic Log
January 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Photographic Log
Photo No.
Description
MW-18
Photo No.
2
Description
CP-08-1, 2, and 3
Date
12/02/08
Date
12/02/08
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
l:\WPGVL IP J1100-0J 17 /1/JJIRIJOOJ 17 /OJ-001.DOC
8-2
January 2009
I Photographic Log Photo No. 3 Description CP-07-1 and2 Photo No. 4 Description CP-12-1 and 2 Date 12/02/08 Date 12/02/08 Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area I \WPGVL\PJT\()().OJJ 7 /\{)J\R/)(/(}J/ 7103-001.DOC B-3 Jan11a1y 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Photographic Log
Photo No.
5
Description
CP-11-1 and 2
Photo No.
6
Description
CP-03-1, 2, and 3
Date
12/02/08
Date
12/02/08
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
l:IWPGVL\P.J11()().QJ 17 /IOJIR()(}()J 17 /03--001.DOC
B-4
Janua,y 2009
Photographic Log Photo No. I Date 1 I 12102108 Description MW-2 and MW-2-2 Photo No. 8 Description Date 12/02/08 Looking towards CP-02-1 and 2 Moniloring Repor/ -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area l:\WPGVL \PJnOO-0SI 7 l'IJJIR(/()()$ 17101-001.DOC B-5 Jan11a1y 2009
Photographic Log Photo No. 9 Description CP-06-1 and 2 Photo No. 10 Description CP-05-1 and 2 Date 12/02/08 Date 12/02/08 Moniloring Reporl -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plan/ Area l:\WPGVL\PJT1()1).0J / 711,/)J\R()()()J 17 /0J.(}()1.DOC B-6 Ja1111a1y 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Photographic Log
Photo No.
11
Description
Date
12/02/08
Looking towards CP-04-1, 2, and 3
Photo No.
12
Description
Sampling FL-06-1 R
Date
12/03/08
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
/:\WPGVLIP J711)().Qj/ 71\0J\R(/(}()5/ 7103-002.DOC
B-7
Janua,y 2009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Photographic Log
Photo No.
13
Description
Purging FL-08-2
Date
12/03/08
Monitoring Report -OU-3 -Former Chlorine Plant Area
l:\WPGVL\PJ1100-05 / 7 /\0J\R/)()()5/ 7103-001.DOC
B-8
January 2009