NCD986232379_20000501_Greshams Lake Industrial Park_FRBCERCLA RI_Phase I Remedial Investigation Work Plan - Appendix E Vol. 1-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN
FOR
GRESHAM'S LAKE SITE
GRESHAM'S LAKE ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
APPENDIX E -PREVIOUS SITE ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
VOLUME I
Remediation Closure Report -Halliburton Industrial Services F?cility
Atec Environmental Consultants -April 1992 ·
Report of Findings Site No. 29 -REA Construction Company
Geraghty & Miller -May 1997
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
D
State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
William W Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT August 21, 1992
Mr. David Arbasak
Halliburton Services
P.O. Box 32
Waynesboro, GA 30830
RE: Close-out of Pollution Incident Halliburton Industrial Services 3219 Northside Drive
Raleigh, Wake County
Dear Mr. Arbasak:
Edmond John Maguire
Regional Manager
At this time the above noted site and groundwater incident is considered closed. After review of the reports submitted to this office in regards to the above site there is no additional information needed at this time.
The Division reserves the right to reopen this case if additional information indicates the need. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Jay Zimmerman or Robert Walton at [phone].
rthur Mouber~?
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: Fay Sweat -PCB
Groundwater file
AM:RW:rw
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101 • Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Telephone [phone] • FAX Number [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I·
. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,
~THALLIBURTON SERVICES
P. 0. Box 32 Hwy 24 East Waynesboro, GA 30830
Toll-Froa 800-932-5326 404-554-4457 Fax [phone]
April 21, 1992
Mr. Jay Zimmerman
Supervisor, Groundwater Section
Raleigh Regional Office
Division of Environmental Management
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite lOi
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
REFERENCE: REMEDIATION CLOSURE REPORT
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES FACILITY
3219 NORTHSIDE .DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
ATEC PROPOSAL# 35-07-92-08480
Dear Mr. Zimmerman:
Enclosed please find a copy of the final report documenting
environmental investigations, remediation activities and closure at
the above referenced site. The report was prepared by ATEC
Associates, Inc. who oversaw site remediation activities and
performed the environmental investigations .
The remediation closure report summarizes the initial site
investigation results and the remedial actions taken. A copy of
the initial report and all laboratory analyses are attached as
appendices. The remainder of the report addresses recent
confirmational borings and laboratory analyses performed per your
requirements to document clean closure of the site.
The report concludes that the contaminated soils identified in
the initial site assessment and subsequent investigation have been
remediated by excavation and proper disposal off-site. A limited
area of low level contamination remains in place at a depth of 22
feet in the deep soil excavation area. No evidence of ground water
impacts has been detected in the existing or abandoned monitoring
wells.
We request that you review this report and forward your
concurrence with the adequacy of the closure of the site. As this
site is no longer under lease by Halliburton and we wish to close
this matter as expeditiously as possible, your prompt attention to
this matter is requested.
tJ/11/1,,. • ' ' . " C
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
I
I
I
I
Page Two
If you should have any questions, please
contact our consultants, Mr. Graham Simmerman
do not hesitate to
of ATEC Associates
for your prompt [phone] or myself. Thank you
considerations.
cc: Max Melton
Steve Burford
Sincerely,
Halliburton Industrial Services
o/0---0?~
David P. Arbasak
District Manager
Graham Simmerman, ATEC Associates, Inc.
Enclosure
I
I
I
1:
1:
I
:I
1: ,-
IJ
IJ
IJ
tJ
tJ
1J
11
t
11
Remediation Assessment Report
Halliburton Industrial Services
Raleigh, North Carolina
ATEC Project No. 35-07-90-08480
A TEC Environmental Consultants
6814 Davis Circle
Raleigh, North Carolina 27613
[phone] Fax: [phone]
I
I ,-
1~ ,~ ,~ .-,-
r: ,·~
•= ! 1;
I J 1-
J
IJ
IJ
17
I ]
I
REMEDIATION ASSESSMENT REPORT
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SER VICES
3219 NORTHSIDE DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
ATEC JOB NO. 35-08480
PREPARED FOR:
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
WAYNESBORO, GEORGIA
PREPARED BY:
ATEC ASSOCIATES, INC.
6814 DA VIS CiRCLE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
1.
I
I_
I
I
I_
I
,t ..
1 ..
1 ..
l,.J
I .J
I .J
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
I J
IJ
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........ , ...................... .". . . . . . . . . . 1
2.0 PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTlON ................. , ................. , . . . 2
3.1 Site Physiography ............ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3.2 Site Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.0 PHASES OF INVESTIGATION ................. , ............. , 6
4.1 Assessment Sampling and Analysis , ...... , ......... , . . . . . 6
4.2 Excavation of Contaminated Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.3 Installation of Monitoring Wells ............. , . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.4 Excavation of Deep Soil Contaminatio~ ................. , 11
4.5 Stockpiled Soils . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.6 Confirmation Borings and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.0 DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
6.0 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
8.0 QUALIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I-
I
I-
I
J
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
11
IJ
IJ
TABLES
Soil Sampling Summary
Soil Analysis Summary
Site Vicinity Map
Site Diagram
MAPS.
Initial Soil Sampling Locations
Confirmation Boring Locations
APPENDIX
Core Sampling and Analysis Report
Soil Analysis Results
Monitoring Well Documents
Groundwater Analysis Results
Soil Stockpile Documents
Site Sensitivity Index Form
Table 1
Table 2
Map 1
Map 2
Map 3
Map 4
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
I
I ,.
• I
I
I
j
J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I i
I J
I J
Remediation Closure Report
Halliburton Industrial Services
3219 Northside Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina
ATEC Project No. 35-08480
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Halliburton Industrial Services (Halliburton) leased and operated a heavy industrial
cleaning operation from a facility located at 3219 Northside Drive, Raleigh North
Carolina. The facility served as a base of operations, a maintenance facility and a
storage depot for equipment and materials including industrial acids and bulk fuel.
Prior to discontinuing a lease on the property, Hal!Jourton voluntarily undertook an -
assessment of the possible environmental impacts that past use of the facility may
have had on the property.
ATEC Environmental Consultants (ATEC), a division of ATEC Associates, was
initially contracted 1:iy Halliburton to perform an assessment· of potential
environmental impacts. The initial field investigation performed in October 1990
indicated that past commercial activities at the site had resulted in surficial soil
contamination by both acids and petroleum hydrocarbons. ATEC was retained to
supervise the excavation and stockpiling of contaminated soils by others and to
perform sampling and analysis to demonstrate the thoroughness of the cleanup
activities. A TEC was subsequently authorized to install and monitor three shallow
groundwater wells, supervise additional excavation in an area of deep soil
contamination and provide supplementary sampling and analysis. Noble Oil
Company was contracted by Halliburton to excavate and dispose of all contaminated
soils and generate a remediation "closure report. A TEC was requested to preform
limited additional testing and provide this closure report. ATEC was continuously
involved in the characterization through closure phase of the project.
1 92-ENV-O&Wl.02-05
I
I
I
I
I
1-
I
I
1-
1 ,~
·17
11
11
11
I J
IJ
I J
I J
3.1
2.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to summarize and document the investigations and
remediation activities provided by ATEC and others in regard to the characterization
and cleanup of past soil contamination at the former Halliburton facility located in
Raleigh, North Carolina. The following report provides site specific information
addressing the original magnitude and extent of soil contamination, site cleanup and
assessment activities sampling and analytical procedures and results. The following
sections present a general site description followed by a summary of each phase of
investigation. An interpretation of the data and conclusions are provided relative to
present site conditions and the thoroughness of the soil cleanup. Data and
supporting documents are attached as Appendices. It is the intent of the authors to
present the information required to achieve clean closure of the site from the North
Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM).
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
Site Physiography
The former Halliburton facility is located at 3219 Northside Drive in the Greshams
Lake section of the City of Raleigh, North Carolina. A site vicinity map adapted
from USGS topographic maps is provided as Figure 1. The vicinity is characterized
by primarily industrial and commercial land usage. The site is bordered and accessed
from Greshams Lake Road (State Route 2013) to the north and Northside Drive
(State Route 2014) to the south. A large office park/warehouse complex is located
directly north of the site across Greshams Lake Road. The site lies approximately
three quarters of a mile west of US Highway 1 North. A ready-mix concrete plant
and associated precast concrete facilities and mixer truck parking is located -
immediately to the east and south. The CSX Railroad tracks lie 1000 feet southeast
2 92-ENV-08480.02.05
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I j
I j
I J
I J
11
I J
I 1
SITE VICINITY MAP
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
RALEIGH REMEDIATION SITE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
ATEC _Environmental Consultants
, Dhrkbtt of A ttc" j\noc.._ Inc.
81!114 Davi• Clrc'-
AalMQft, Nonh c.roMna 27813
(111)'1'12-2m"-•
[phone] FAX
S=it: DIAIIII BY: Cll!CXED 8Y: DATE: PRO.l!CT ao; FIGURE NO.
in = 2000 ft USGS GHS U/19/91 35-08480 1
I
I l 11
IJ
I J
I J
I J
IJ
I J
IJ
l
FORMER LOCATION
OF ABOVE GROUND
STORAGE TANKS
""" "" •
I
EXCAVATED AREA
L
DEEP EXCAVATION AREA GRAVEL LOT
. ) "'1-3
STORM
0~
CONG.
SLAB
WASTE OIL
TANK AREA
r7
EXCAVATED AREA
HALLIBURTON
SERVICES
I
omcEs
CONCRrn:
PAD
I
LEGEND
w z
_J
~ w 0...
0 0::
0...
_________ __,\ I.___ _______ _,
NORTHSIDE DRIVE
SITE DIAGRAM
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
3219 NORTHSIDE DRIVE
RALEIGH, NOP.TH CAROLINA
ATEC
V
Environmental Consultants
Division of ATEC Associates, Inc.
6814 lla-lis Cil<le
Ralei!h, tlC 27613
!919 782-2832
919 781-7558 FAX
I J
I l
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
of the site between the concrete plant and Greshams Lake. A construction
company's storage yards and a stone quarry are located to the west and southwest,
respectively.
The subject property is occupied by a single, one-story sheet metal building
approximately 80.0 feet wide by 145.0 feet long sitting on a tract approximately 500
by 400 feet (see Figure 2). The building and attached office face towards Northside
Drive. The area in front of the structure is occupied by a half concrete and half
gravel parking Jot. A large gravel storage yard is present in the rear of the building.
This rear lot is accessed by a gravel drive around the eastern end of the building or
from a second entrance off of Greshams Lake Road.
There is a roughly rectangular concrete pad with a cinder block retaining wall located
150 feet north from the west corner of the building. This pad was the former
location of the above-ground storage tanks (ASTs) which included a diesel fuel tank,
two hydrochloric acid tanks, and a phosphoric acid tank. Additional concrete pads
are located just outside the garage door behind the building at either end. A single
waste oil tank was once located directly adjacent and behind the building next to the
eastern garage facilities.
The site is overall flat lying, but slopes gently downwards toward the south. A
shallow drainage ditch is located along the northern portion of the western property
line immediately behind the former storage tank pad. The ditch drains to the south
into a storm sewer drop-inlet ninety feet northwest of the building. The storm sewer
drains south paralleling the property line.
Two stockpiles of excavated soils with an estimated combined volume of 1800 cubic
yards were temporarily stored on site on plastic sheeting. These stockpiles were
located north of the building in the parking and driveway areas of the site. The
stockpiles were removed from the site to a permitted disposal facility.
4 92-ENV-08480.02--0S
I 7
I 7 GRESHAM LAKE ROAD N
I C-12
J • • C-28
C-1 e
• c-10 I I J • C-25
e C-27
C4'8
C-li I FORMER LOCATION J • • C-4-
OF ABOVE GROUND e C-28 C-17 • STORAGE TANKS
D J e C-211
L • D C-24
J C-$0 C-18 c-.s • • u c--.3 C-6 •
J • C-3
-C-19 -• I C-$0 • c-u w
J • C-2 z ::::i
C--8 C-22 ~ • 0 C-9 • • C-20 w
....J • C-7 • CL
• C-31 CONC. • 0
0 ·c-1:1 I SLAB c-1 c::: CL
J C-32 e CONC. C-21 • SLAB • g J LEGEND
I •c-13 INlTIAL SAMPLE
J HAWBURTON POINT LOCATION
SERVICES
• J
I J OFFlCES • C-33
I C~M I
I J NORTHSIDE DRIVE
I ] INrnAL SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS ATEC Environmental Consultant&
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES O"rliaion cf AID: As,oclates, Inc.
3219 NORTHSIDE DRIVE T 11814 Da,lo Cllde ·
~ NC 27113
I RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 7llZ-ZIIJZ
J g 781-7558 11,X
1~ Of11~ = ~ l DRAWN BY: 1~; 11~2-19-91 11~~0 11-~ 1 I J : ·coc/EGB
I J
I 7
• J
I J
I J
I J
I J
0 J
D J
I J
0 J
B J
D J
I J
g J
I J
I J
I J
I I J
3.2 Site Geology
The site is located in the Piedmont Provence of North Carolina, and within the
Raleigh Belt. The site overlies the Injected Gneiss Member of the Raleigh Belt, a
northeastward trending belt of medium to high-grade metamorphic and intrusive
igneous rocks of Late Proterozoic to Permian Age. The Injected Gneiss Member is
characterized as a biotite gneiss and schist intruded by numerous sills and dikes of
granite, pegmatite and aplite. Hornblende gneiss occurs as a minor facies.
Structurally, the site lies between the Raleigh Anticline to the west and the Nutbush
Creek Fault to the east. These features also trend northeastward parallelling the
general trend of the Raleigh Belt.
4.0 PHASES OF INVESTIGATION
4.1 Assessment Sampling and Analysis
A TEC Environmental Consultants was retained by Halliburton Industrial Services in
October 1990 to conduct an environmental assessment of potential soil contamination
at the leased site in Raleigh. The investigation was limited to shallow soil sampling
by hand auger methods and laboratory analysis. The results of the assessment were
presented in a report entitled "Core Sampling and Analysis," dated October 24, 1990
(Appendix A).
Thirty-four random surficial soil samples were obtained from the site at depths to
twelve to sixteen inches (Figure 3 and Appendix A). Soil sample locations were
chosen on a random, representative basis from throughout the rear lot and other
select locations based on past use and/or surface staining. Each of the samples were
field screened utilizing a photoionization detector (PID) for organic vapors. Eighteen
6 92-ENY-03480.02-0l
•
I
l -
I l
I ;
• J
I J
I J
I J
I J
m J
I J
I 7 -I l -
m 7 -
J
I J
I 7
0 J
ID J
of the samples were analyzed by laboratory methods for the presence of Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) from diesel product and/or waste motor oil by EPA
Method 8015 and 418.1 and for pH changes from acids or caustics by EPA Method
9045 (Appendix B). Samples analyzed were chosen considering the PID results, soil
staining by hydrocarbons or oxides, and overall location.
Eight samples (C-6, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 24 and 30)indicated pH values that deviated
significantly from the mean pH of 5.04. Sample with low pH valves were typically
from areas with orange oxide staining. The TPH analysis performed by EPA method
418.1 showed three sample locations (C-10, 13 and 30) to contain TPH concentrations
in excess of the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM)
action level of 10.0 ppm TPH. The TPH analysis for diesel fuel by EPA modified
method 8015/5030 with purge and trap extraction indicated that all surficial soil
samples were below the DEM action level for diesel fuel contamination in the initial
investigation.
A TEC issued a report on the site assessment activities entitled "Core Sampling and
Analysis, Halliburton Services" on October 24, 1990. This report summarized the
field and analytical methods employed in the investigation, and presented conclusion
based on the laboratory analyses. ATEC reco=ended that all surficial soils
determined to be contaminated should be excavated botl:i vertically and laterally to
the extent that no contamination remained and/or the DEM action level for TPH and
normal pH values were achieved. ATEC further reco=ended that the Division of
Environmental Management be informed of the presence of surficial petroleum
contamination as per applicable regulations.
8 92-ENV -0&480.02-0S
I J
I 1
I J
I J
E J
I J
I J
I J
IJ
I
I J
I J
IJ
I J
I 1
I l
ll
4.2 Excavation of Contaminated Soils
Halliburton contracted to Noble Oil Company of Sanford, North Carolina to
excavate, stockpile and dispose of contaminated soil from those areas of surficial
contamination indicated in the A TEC investigation. A TEC supervised the excavation
and removal of contaminated soils from the site. The lateral limits of soil
contamination were determined in the field by observational methods and PID
screening, and surficial soils were excavated to a minimum depth of two feet.
Locally, excavations varied from two to seven feet in depth. Soils that were
discolored, contained traces of petroleum vapors, or were otherwise observed to
possess abnormal characteristics were excavated until no further signs of
contamination could be observed. Areas of pH and TPH contamination were
excavated with enough peripheral soils to insure that all visually contaminated soils
were removed as were soils with unusual or petroleum odors. The surface of the site
in the vicinity surrounding the excavation areas was scraped to a depth of
approximately three inches to insure that all effected areas were addressed.
Excavations were backfill with a total of 608 tons of crushed stone. The excavated
soils were placed on and covered by plastic sheeting, and properly bermed, to protect
the surrounding area from secondary contamination. The initial remediation by
excavation and removal was completed on October 30, 1990. All disposal certificates
are presented in Appendix E.
A discrete soil sample for laboratory analysis was obtained from the bottom of each
excavated area to confirm that removal was complete and initially confirm clean
closure. The location of these samples can be found in the assessment report
presented in Appendix A Each sample was collected as close as possible to the
location of the original assessment samples or below that portion of the excavation
where the maximum contaminant concentration was indicated. A hand auger was
advanced at the bottom of each excavation to a depth of approximately 4.0 inches.
The hand augers were decontaminated between borings with isopropyl alcohol and
9 92-ENY--08480.02-05
• 7
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
4.3
deionized water to avoid cross-contamination. Soil samples were properly labeled,
preserved on ice and shipped to an ATEC laboratory for . chemical testing.
Laboratory analyses included both TPH by EPA modified method 8015/5030 and pH
for each sample. Analytical results (see Appendix B) indicated that no petroleum·
contamination was present and that pH values are within acceptable ranges per 40
CFR 261, Subpart C.
Installation of Monitoring Wells
Three monitoring wells were installed at the site under Well Construction Permit No.
91-0905-WM-0433 dated November 16, 1990. The initial well was installed at the
request of the DEM to confirm that surficial soil contamination had not impacted
-groundwater quality at the site. Monitoring Well MW-1 was installed on November·
20, 1991 to a Depth of 23 feet. A well construction record form and boring log are
enclosed in Appendix C. Moist and wet zones were encountered during well
installation due to perched water conditions, but water was not observed in the well
72 hours after well completion. A single soil sample collected between 23.5 and 25.0
feet was analyzed for TPH by EPA Method 8015/5030 (Appendix B). The results
(Sample ID #13639) indicated soil contamination by diesel fuel at a concentration
of 114 ppm. The DEM was notified of the soil contamination in a memorandum
dated December 10, 1990 by Mr. Waheed Rana, P.G .. A Site Sensitivity Evaluation
was presented with this memo which had a total score of 32. MW-1 was abandoned
by grouting due to concerns that it had penetrnted a zone of potentially contaminated
perched water and had not been constructed as a double-cased well. The upper
portion of MW-1 was removed by subsequent contaminated soil excavation.
Two additional monitoring wells were installed at the site south of the former AST
pad in the vicinity of an emergency safety shower on December 11 and 12, 1991.
These wells were constructed as two-inch diameter Type III, double-cased wells to
case off the shallow perched water zone penetrated by MW-1 and prevent any
10 92-ENV -084'0.02-0l
•
I
I -
I -
I
I -
I :
I -
I :
I
I J
I J
I .:
I _,
4.4
potential for th~ vertical migration of contaminants within the borehole. Both wells
were completed at a depth of 45 feet and constructed with 15 feet of two-inch
diameter screen (Appendix C).
The wells were developed on December 13, 1990 by harid bailing methods. Static
water level measurements were takeri on January 1, 1991. Prior to well purging,
water depths of 34.49 and 36.15 feet were measured from MW-2 and MW-3,
respectively. The measurements and subsequent measurements suggest shallow
groundwater flow is to the southwest at the southern end of the AST pad and below
the deep excavation area.
Wells MW-2 and MW-3 were sampled for analysis on December 17, 1990 and
January 1, 1991 (See Appendix D). Each well was purged of three bore volumes
prior to sampling. Samples taken on December 17 were analyzed for TPH by EPA
Method 8015 with purge and trap. Samples taken on January 1, 1991 were analyzed
by EPA Method 602. The laboratory results for both analyses were non-detect for
all constituents.
Excavation of Deep Soil Contamination
ATEC was authorized by Mr. Dave Arbasak of Halliburton on January 7, 1991 to
proceed with the excavation of contaminated soil from the vicinity of MW-1 and
MW-2. Excavation was initiated on January 21, 1991 by James Massengill and Sons
Construction Company of Gamer, North Carolina. During the excavation, trapped
water was observed draining into the pit at a depth of 4.0 feet below grade. Peak
PIO readings were recorded as 4.2 ppm at 11.0 feet, 2.8 ppm between 7 and 17 feet
along the southern side of the excavation and 3.0 ppm from 10 to 15 feet deep along
the western wall. The pit was excavated to a total depth of 21.0 feet. A total of
three soil samples were taken from the bottom and sidewalls of the excavation based
on PIO screening and analyzed for TPH by Method 8015 with purge and trap. Two
11 92-ENV-084'0.02-0S
4.5
of the three samples were below detectable limit. However, sample SP#2 from the
southern side wall of the excavation had a TPH concentration of 209 ppm. The
excavation was extended to the south, east and west. The expanded excavation
removed the upper portion of MW-2 which had been abandoned by grouting
(Appendix C). The additional excavation of the side walls was completed on
February 21, 1991. Two additional samples, SP#l and SP#2 from the eastern and
southern sidewalls, were analyzed for TPH by EPA modified method 8015/5030 and
demonstrated TPH levels were below detectable levels.
Approximately 500 tons of soil were removed from the pit with dimensions of 30 x
25 x 21. These soils were placed in a stockpile with the soil previously excavated.
The deep excavation was backfilled with a total of 571 tons of crushed stone.
Stockpiled Soils
The soils from the initial and deep excavation areas were combined into a single
stockpile prior to off-site disposal. Several alternatives from soil disposal were
considered including land farming and bioremediation prior to off-site disposal by Lee
Paving in Sanford, North Carolina.
A composite sample from the stockpiled soils was analyzed by NATEX Laboratories
as directed by Noble Oil Services. The composite sample was found to contain a
moderate level of diesel fuel contamination. The TPH concentrations in the soils
were within limits permissible for disposal by Noble Oil Company. The total volume
of stockpiled soil was 1,241.48 tons. The certificate of disposal and laboratory
analyses are presented in Appendix E~
12 92-ENV--08480.02-0S
I J
I J
m J
I J
I J
I J
• J
I ....J
I J
11 ....J
I ,
I -,
-!
I Ji
I Ji
I Ji
I -i
I -
4.6 Confirmation Borings and Analysis
Seventeen additional hollow-stem auger borings were drilled on November 6 and 7,
1991 within or adjacent to previously excavated and backfilled areas to confirm that
clean closure had been achieved in these areas. Two borings were advanced through
the backfill into the underlying soils in each of four excavated areas. Nine additional
borings were advanced surrounding the deep excavation area south of the former
AST pad (see Figure 4).
Borings B-1 and 2 were advanced though 20.5 feet of crushed stone backfill within
the deep excavation area and into the underlying red micaceous soil. Nine additional
borings were advanced around the deep excavation. Boring B-3, 4, 15 and 16 were
drilled to the west of the excavated area, B-8 and 17 were drilled to the south and ·
B-5, 6 and 7 were drilled to the east of the deep excavation. The purpose of the nine
additional borings was to define the lateral extent of the excavations and investigate
the potential for lateral contaminant migration in the subsurface .
Boring B-9 and 10 were advance through 5.0 feet of crushed stone fill in the eastern
excavation area adjacent to the eastern garage entrance. This location was previously
excavated for surficial pH and TPH contamination .
Boring B-11 and 12 well drilled in the former waste oil tank area. The waste oil AST
was removed from the site and the area was undercut and replaced with two foot of
gravel fill by others prior the initial site assessment activities.
Borings B-13 and B-14 were drilled in the excavated area northeast of the AST pad
and south of Greshams Lake Road. This area had been contaminated by TPH.
13
:u1
i~1;1111i{iiJJ
EXCAVATED AREA
OJ
07
07
8 J
OJ
IJ
IJ
UJ
U l .-
FORMER LOCATION
OF ABOVE GROUND
STORAGE TANKS GRAVEL LOT
EJ
IJ
1:
I~
I~
iJ
IJ
I ·1 I SHEn
I
SlORll
~
-,., •
B16 •
114 •,s DEEP EXCAVATION AREA
B15 • • -,,,j{fli/ Bi B7
• 81 )~~}~• •
J.-JoBB
CONC.
SLAB
WASTE OIL
TANK AREA
B~1
HALLIBURTON
SERVICES
LEGEND
w z :::;
~ a::: w
0... 0 a:::
0...
OFFICES
CONCRETE
PNJ
I
NORTHSIDE DRIVE
CONFIRMATION BORING LOCATIONS
HALLIBURTON · INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
3219 NORTHSIDE DR!VE
RALEIGH, NOP.TH CAROLINA
I
ATEC
T
Environmental Consultants
Division of ATEC Associates, Inc.
6814 Orr.ris Circle
(919 7B2-2832 Raleir t/C 27613
(919 781-7558 FAX
11
CATE: 11 PROJECT NO_. 11 FIGURE NO._
4 12-19-91 . _ . _
0 ' i
0
u-
BJ
7 I D _J
7
0 J
7
I
_;
7
D --'
a
Two samples each from the base of the four excavation areas were analyzed for TPH
by EPA modified Method 8015 with both purge and trap and extraction procedures
(EPA Method 5030 and 3550). A single sample from each area under went Toxicity
Characterization Leaching Procedure (TCLP) extraction and appropriate analyses.
TCLP analyses for Volatile and Base/Neutral Extractable organics were run on
samples from each of the diesel contaminated areas (B-1, 9 and 13). TCLP analyses
for volatile and priority pollutant metals were run a are sample from boring B-11 in
the former waste oil tank area. Laboratory results are presented in Appendix B. A
soil sampling summary indicating specific samples and analysis methods is presented
in Table 1.
Petroleum residual was below detectable concentrations in all but one confirmational _
boring. Hydrocarbons in the diesel fuel range was detected in a single sample from
boring B-1 taken at the base of the deepest point of the previously excavated area.
Concentration of TPH were reported at 77 ppm by the purge and trap· method
(method 5030) and 113 ppm by the extraction (method 3550). The difference in
values indicate that the volatile components of the fuel present are partially degraded
to higher molecular weight residual ( see Table 2).
TCLP analyses for volatile organics, Base/Neutral Arom_atic Organics and priority
pollutant metals were performed for the four excav<1-ted areas. These analyses
indicated all concentration were below detectable concentrations (see Table 2).
A water sample from monitoring well MW-3, the only remaining ground water
monitoring well at the site was sampled on November 7, 1991 and analyzed for
organics constituents and pH (See Appendix D). Organic analyses performed were
EPA Method 602 and Method 625. A library search and manual identification of the
ten largest peak for the Method 625 analysis was attempted but only eight compound
registered at greater than 10% of the internal standard areas. The pH analyses
indicated groundwater pH remains unchanged at 5.5 units.
15 92-ENV--08480.02-0S
D 7 I
D ...,
u 7 -
0 -, 11&11]
0 7
-B-1 Sl
I -S2
B-2 Sl
D -S2
S3
0 7 S4
I B-3 NS -Sl B-4
D S2
I S3
I S4
B-5 NS
u -B-6 NS ;
Bs7 Sl • -S2
S3
m -B-8 Sl
S2 I -.
' S3 -
I B-9 Sl -
S2 -
I -S3
' S4 -
I -
-
S5
I -
-
TABLE 1
SOIL SAMPLING SUMMARY
REMEDIATION CLOSURE REPORT
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
21.0 -21.5 X
21.5 -22.0 X
21.5 -22.0 X X. X
22.0 -22.5 X X X
22.5 -23.0 X X
23.0 -23.5 X X
22.5 -23.0 X
23.0 -23.5 X
23.5 -24.0
24.0 -24.5
15.0 -15.5
15.5 -16.0 X
16.0 -16.5 X
15.0 -15.5
15.5 -16.0 X
16.0 -16.5 X
7.5 -8.0 X X X
8.0 -8.5 X X X
8.5 -9.0 X X
9.0 -9.5 X X
9.5 -10.0 X X
16
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
. 11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
92-ENV -08480.02-05
I -
g -
g -
0 -
0
0 -
D -
n ,
II ""'
I -
m
I -
I -
I -
I -
I -
I -.~
I -
•=
B-10
B-11
B-12
B-13
Sl
S2
S3
S4
S5
Sl
S2
S3
S4
S5
Sl
S2
S3
S4
S5
Sl
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
TABLE 1
SOIL SAMPLING SUMMARY
REMEDIATION CLOSURE REPORT
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
7.0 -7.5
7.5 -8.0. X
8.0 -8.5 X
9.0 -9.5
9.5-10.0
2.0 -2.5 X X
2.5 -3.0 X X
3.0 -3.5 X
3.5 -4.0 X
4.0 -4.5 X
2.0 -2.5
2.5 -3.0 X
3.0 -3.5 I X
4.0 -4.5
4.5 -5.0
5.0 -5.5 X X X
5.5 -6.0 X X X
6.0 -6.5 X X
6.5 -7.0 X X
7.0 -7.5 X X
7.5 -8.0 X X
17
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
X 11/06/91
X 11/06/91
X 11/06/91
X 11/06/91
X 11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
11/06/91
92-ENV--08480.02-0S
g J
0 7
D 7 iitfl#: '. iiil~~li! ji/!i
B-19 S1
S2
S3
S4
S-15 S1
S2
S3
I S4
S5
m -S6
S7
m -S-16 S1
S2
I -S3
S4 I -S5
S6 I -S7
I -S8
I -
I -
I -
TABLE 1
soir. SAMPLING SUMMARY
REMEDIATION CLOSURE REPORT
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
5.0 -5.5 X
5.5 -6.0 X
6.0 -6.5
7.5 -8.0
7.5 -8.0
11.0 -11.5
12.0 -12.5
12.5 -13.0
15.0 -15.5 X
15.5 -16.0 X
16.0 -16.5
5.0 -7.5
7.5 -9.0
10.0 -10.5
10.5 -11.0
11.0 -11.5
12.5 -13.0
13.0 -13.5
13.5 -14.0
18
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
92-ENY-08480.02-0S
I
g
g
0
D
0 -S-17
D -
u -• -
I
I -
I -
I -
-
I-
I-
I-
I-
I-
I-
Sl
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
SB
S9
SlO
TABLE 1
SOIL SAMPLING SUMMARY
REMEDIATION CLOSURE REPORT
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
10.0 -10.5
10.5 -11.0
11.0 -11.5
12.5 -13.0
13.0 -13.5
13.5 -14.0
14.0 -15.0
15.0 -15.5
15.5 -16.0
16.0 -16.5
19
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
11/07/91
I ~
0 7
u J
D 1
D
D -
D -
u -
I -
m
I -
I -
I -
I -
I -
I -
I -
I
I -
B-1
B-2
B-4
B-7
B-8
B-9
B-10
B-11
B-12
B-13
B-14
B-15
NOTES:
TABLE 2
SOIL ANALYSIS SUMMARY
REMEDIATION CLOSURE REPORT
HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES
77 113 ND ND
ND ND NA NA
.
ND ND NA NA
ND ND NA NA
ND ND NA NA
ND ND ND ND
ND ND NA NA
ND ND ND NA
ND ND NA NA
ND ND ND ND
ND ND NA NA
ND ND NA NA
ND= None Detected
NA = Not Analyzed
Concentrations in parts per million (mg/I)
20
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
92-ENV--08480.02-05
I
u-
u-
o:
u-
u:
u:
0~
D -
D
I -
0
0
D
H
0
D -
0
D
5.0 DISCUSSION
The initial assessment sampling identified eight areas with abnormal pH values and
three areas of elevated TPH concentration. Each of these areas were excavated to
remove the surficial and shallow contamination. Acid impacts were generally
confined to the upper foot of soil. Deeper excavation was required in the vicinity of
locations C-10, 13 and 30 where TPH was detected. Soils were excavated to visual
observations and PID field screening indicated the areas were clean. Field screening
was followed immediately by laboratory testing of one sample from each location
previously indicated contaminated. These result indicated that the removal was
complete. Subsequently, two sample each were taken from the areas surrounding C-
10, 13 and 30 and the vicinity of the previously unsampled waste oil tank area during
conformational analyses. These analyses for TPH and TCLP organics -and metals
indicated that the removal was complete except in a single location, B-1, north of
location C-30 in the area of deep excavation.
The single confirmational soil analysis for TPH (B-1) detected residual soil
contamination at 77 to 113 ppm by Method 5030 and 3550, respectively. The depth
of the analyzed sample was from 21.0 to 22.0 feet below the ground surface. The
single remaining groundwater monitoring well MW-3 is located fifteen feet
immediately downgradient from Boring B-1. Groundwater analysis by EPA Method
602 and 625 of this well detected no organic constituents, suggesting the remaining
petroleum is absorbed into the soil matrix.
A Site Sensitivity Evaluation was prepared for the site on December 10, 1990
immediately following the installation of monitoring well MW-1 and prior to the deep
excavations, the installation of monitoring well MW-2 and MW-3 and the drilling of
the confirmation borings. The SSE index value calculated for the site was 32,
indicating the site had a low sensitivity to hydrocarbon impacts.
21 92-ENV-08480.02-0S
.J
I J
I
I ,
I
I -
I I -
I l •
I 1
I -
• n -
A re-assessment of the SSE index value was performed for this report based on more
recent subsurface information. This information indicates that a. confining layer is
present on site below the depth of soil contamination and that the depth to
groundwater is greater than that estimated from well MW-1. The presence of
confining strata below the soil contamination and laboratory analyses which confirmed
that the contaminants were high boiling point hydrocarbons lowered the SSE value
ten points. The recognition of relict metamorphic structures in the zone of
contamination off-sets five points of this reduction. The resulting SSE index valve of
27 indicates that the site is low in sensitivity to environmental impacts and that a soil
cleanup goal in the range of 60 ppm is warranted.
The only know contamination remaining on site is located in a well defined area at
a depth of 21.0 to 22.0 feet. Neither a groundwater monitoring well previously ·
completed with ten feet of this location (MW-2), nor the remaining well (MW-3)
located 15 feet from this location have detected groundwater impacts. TPH
concentration of 77 and 113 by EPA Method 8015/5030 and 8015/3550, respectively
are relatively low. The SSE index indicates that the site is of low sensitivity and the
location of the site in an industrial area limits the probability of exposure to the
public. The combined factors of the depth to contaminated soils, depth to
groundwater, low TPH concentrations, site location, soil lithology, and absence of
petroleum products in monitoring wells indicate that the remaining soil contamination
left in-place is of minimal risk to the public and environment.
22 92-ENV-03480.02-05
D T
u
D
I
u ,
i
·u J
D J
I J
I .1
I) U J
D J
D
D . \
u
B -
u -
D·
D
D
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based upon the field observation and laboratory analyses result prior to, during and
after site remediation and ongoing groundwater monitoring at the Site, ATEC
concludes the following:
1. That each of the areas identified as potentially impacted during the initial
assessment of site contamination have been excavated and remediated to the
extent feasible.
2. Groundwater contamination has never been observed in the groundwater
monitoring wells located on the Site.
3. The waste oil tank site show no indications of petroleum or metals
contamination.
4. Soil samples taken and analyzed for TPH and pH prior to backfilling
excavated areas indicated no remaining contamination.
5. Confirmational soil borings indicated all petroleum contamination has been
removed except in a limited area in the bottom of the northern-most portion
of the deep excavation. A small volume of moderately contaminated soils (77
ppm TPH by 8015/5030 and 113 ppm TPH by 8015/3550) remain in place
which are not feasible to excavate.
6. Groundwater well MW-3 located immediately adjacent and downgradient of
the remaining soil contamination indicates no groundwater contamination.
7. All previously identified area of contamination have been adequately abated
and no further remediation is warranted.
23 92-ENV-084>0.02.0S
n
H
n
I -
I -
I 7 ' . .
m -,
• I . ,,
I
. '
I
I -
I
I
,.
I -.
I
I-..
I~
I-,_
I
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the accumulated data, ATEC reco=ends the following:
1. Based on the limited lateral extent, depth and low concentration of total
petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the vicinity of the deep excavation
no further excavation or remediation is recommended. The small volume of
affected soils that remain in the vicinity of boring B-1 at a depth of 21.0 feet
should remain in-place .
2. No further action is required on other areas previously identified as
contaminated and remediated.
3. The Division of Environmental Management should be informed as to the
status of the remediation of the site and concurrence on the remediation
closure of site be established by the Division of Environmental Management.
4. Upon DEM concurrence, monitoring well MW-3 should be abandoned by
grouting in accordance with North Carolina's well standard.
24 92-ENV-08480.02.0S
I
I
I
I
I
B
D
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7
~
i
.. "
7
I . '
8.0 QUALIFICATIONS
Our evaluation of impairment at the site has been based on the available information
and data obtained during our research and field investigation. The services have
been performed in accordance with generally accepted standards for this level of
assessment and is intended for the sole use of our client. Our conclusions are limited
to the subsurface conditions at the time and locations sampled. We have conducted
such investigations as deemed necessary, in our professional judgement to reasonably
identify potential petroleum contamination at this site. A TEC Associates, Inc. is not
responsible for the conclusions or opinions made by others based on the findings of
this report.
25 92.ENV-08480.02-05
I
n-
o-
o-
n
D .:
o-
~
0 ~
u--
D :
D
17
g-
g -
u-
g-
m~
m-
m,_
•~
APPENDIX A
SOIL CORING AND ANALYSIS REPORT
0~
D.
0~
I_
0~
o_
D_
u_
D
0.
o:
o:
0]
o:
n:
n:
u:
u.
o:
CORE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
Halliburton Service
3219 Northside Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina
ATEC Job No. 35-08480
0 J
0 7
I 1
DJ
OJ
0 _J
I _J
U ,1
I -l
n -
IJ .~ ,~
-~ -~ -~
CORE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
HALLIBURTON SERVICES
3219 NORTHSIDE DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
ATEC JOB NO. 35-08480
I : J
D
0: -~
0: _J
I: .l
U ,l
n: J
u J
D l r
I --
0 ,J
R ~
17
I :~
I ~
1:
m:
I~ ,~,
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
SITE DESCRIPTION
PURPOSE
FIELD ACTIVITIES
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
CONCLUSIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
TABLES
Analytical Results
.. ,.
ATTACHMENTS
Vicinity Map
Site Diagram
Core Locations
PID Results
pH Contamination Map
TPH Contamination Map
Analytical Results
Photo Documentation
1
1
2
.2
TABLE 1
ATTACHMENT I
ATTACHMENT II
ATTACHMENT III
ATTACHMENT IV
ATTACHMENT V
ATTACHMENT VI
ATTACHMENT VII
ATTACHMENT VIII
2
4
4
11 I
1.1
11
11
fl
1.0 INTRODUCTION
CORE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
Halliburton Services
3219 Northside Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina
ATEC JOB NO. 35-08480
ATEC Environmental Consultants (ATEC) was retained by Halliburton Industrial Services
to perform core sampling, analysis, and photodocumentation at the project site referenced
above. The project site is located at 3219 Northside Drive in Raleigh, North Carolina.
A vicinity map illustrating the project location is provided in ATTACHMENT I. The
objective of this investigation was to establish whether or not there is an environmental
impact due to acid storage tanks and/or petroleum hydrocarbons.
The following report provides site specific information describing work performed, field
findings, analytical results, and interprets the data and provides conclusions relative to the
present site conditions.
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject area consists of a one-story sheet metal building approximately 80.0 feet wide
by 145.0 feet long sitting on a plot approximately five hundred feet by four hundred feet
(see ATTACHMENT II). Topographically the subject area is essentially flat with a
general surface slope downwards towards the south-west. There is an above-ground
storage tank (AST) island 150.0 feet north from the west corner of the building. This
island contains two hydrochloric acid (HCL) tanks, one Phosphoric acid (H2P04) tank,
and is the former location of a diesel fuel tank. ATEC was informed that all ASTs are
empty. A waste oil tank was once located directly in front of the center of the building.
The former site of the waste oil tank has been excavated and backfilled previously by
another contractor. North and south section of the site are predominantly used for
parking only. The area East of the building consists of scrub brush and pine trees. The
area West of the building is a large field consisting of dense growth. Gresham Lake Road
borders the north edge of the site and Northside Drive borders the South edge of the site.
A large shopping complex is located directly to the north of the site.
Surficial soils at the project site consists of gravelly to sandy soils with trace clay and rock
fragments. There is no asphalt or concrete ground cover at the site. A photodocumentary
about the project site can be found in ATTACHMENT VIII.
1
g.
I
0
O-
D -
• -
I
I
1-
1 --
1 -
I
I
I
3.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this investigation was to obtain a minimum of eighteen core samples from random, representative locations at the site and have them analyzed
for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), Diesel Product, Waste Motor Oil (TPH-IR) and pH (for acidity test) to establish any environmental impact to surficial soils by petroleum
hydrocarbons and/or acids.
4.0 FIELD ACTMTIES
A hand auger was utilized by an ATEC representative who was present at the project site on September, 1990 to initiate field activities to accomplish the above-mentioned scope of work to collect thirty-four core samples from random, locations from areas most likely to have been contaminated by one or more of the above mentioned chemicals. A hand auger was utilized to collect core samples from surficial soils. The hand auger was decontaminated between borings with isopropyl alcohol and deionized water to avoid cross-contamination. Duplicate samples were collected, one for field screening with a photoionization detector (PID) and the other for laboratory testing. PID readings with soil description can be found in ATTACHMENT IV. Soil samples were properly preserved on ice and shipped to an A TEC's laboratory for chemical testing. A total of 34 core samples were collected for possible field investigations. The locations of samples can be found in ATTACHMENT III. ATEC also submitted two samples to the laboratory; one· as a field blank and the other for background levels. The ATEC representative, while at the project site, also visually inspected all of the above-ground storage tanks (AST's) and photodocumented their apparent physical condition. ·-
5.0 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Soil samples were obtained from each of the thirty-four coring locations at the site. These samples were obtained from a depth of 12.0 to 16.0 inches below the ground surface. The core sample, C-21, was taken from the former location of the waste oil tank at a depth of five feet to compensate for the backfill and to sample native soil. A water sample was also obtained from the facility's groundwater well. The samples were placed. in appropriate containers, labeled, placed on ice, and shipped to the ATEC Environmental laboratory in Atlanta, Georgia. The samples were analyzed for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), Diesel Product, Waste Oil, and pH. Results of the chemical analysis for the soil samples are presented in Table I and ATTACHMENT VIL The pH analysis shows the mean pH of all samples to be 5.04. The acceptable range of pH is between 4.5 and 5.5. Samples C-6, C-13, C-15, C-16, C-18, C-24, C-29, and C-30 all fall outside of the acceptable range. The Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH by EPA method 418.1) analysis show C-10, C-13, and C-30 to have TPH concentrations in excess of the DEM
2
I l I .;
•••
I -
I -
-I -
-g -
g -
g_
g_
g_
o:
o:
n=
D--U-
D-
D-
I-
action level of 10 ppm TPH. The diesel fuel analysis (modified 8015) shows all samples to be below the DEM action level for diesel fuel contamination.
Groundwater sample collected from the water well indicated absence of petroleum contamination.
The anomalous areas indicating pH readings are indicated in ATTACHMENT V. The sampling locations showing elevated TPH levels are presented as ATTACHMENT VI. It appears that areas where former diesel/waste oil were located, indicated elevated TPH levels. This requires further remediation work to define areal and vertical extent of contamination prior to taking remedial action.
The areas with anomalous pH values are highly acidic ,,;th one exception (i.e. C-16) which indicates basic soils with a pH of 9.0.
3
I
I
TABLE I g ANALYTICAL RESULTS
D TPH 418.1 MODIFIED 8015
CORE NO. PH mg/Kg (mg/Kg) RANGE
D-C-1 5.3 ND ND
C-2 NT NT
D C-3 5.0 NT ND
C-4 NT NT ND
C-5 NT NT ND
I -C-6 4.4 NT 5.3 DIESEL
C-7 NT NT ND
,.., C-8 5.5 NT NT
1-C-9 5.0 NT
C-10 NT 39.9
. C-11 NT ND
1-C-13 6.5 66.2
C-14 4.7 NT
.. C-15 4.2 NT
I C-16 9.0 NT
C-17 4.6 NT 7.7 DIESEL
~ C-18 4.2 NT 1-C-19 4.5 ND
C-20 NT NT ND
~ C-21 NT NT ND 1-C-22 NT NT ND
C-23 NT ND ~:~
I C-24 5.7
C-25 4.7
C-26 4.6 ND
1--C-27 4.7
C-28 4.6 ND
~ C-29 3.5 ND
I C-30 4.3 4180
C-31 5.1
• C-33 5.5
I C-34 5.2 ND
GW#l 5.5 ND ND*
I Mean pH=5.04; ND=Not Detected; NT=Not Tested
' I -4
-
I -
I ..
I
g ! I ..
0 7
-,
D
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
I
11
I.
I
I
6.0 CONCLUSION
Based upon the analytical results of the soil samples, ATEC concludes .the following:
1) Five core samples exhibit significant pH deviations (4.5> x >5.5) from the mean
pH of 5.0. These samples that have a pH below 4.5 can be attributed to
contamination from the acid tanks at the site.
2) Three soil samples have TPH contamination in excess of the state's 10 ppm
action level.
3) There is no Diesel fuel contamination based on these samples.
4) There is no groundwater contamination based on the samples taken.
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
ATEC recommends the following:
1) The Division of Environmental Management (DEM) should be informed of
petroleum contamination as per applicable regulations.
2) Soils around locations designated as C-6, C-10, C-13, C-15, C-16, C-18, C-24,
C-29, and C-30 should be excavated to an extent where soils are either free of
contamination, or levels of contamination fall below less than 10 ppm TPH and
the pH falls in a range greater than 4.5 and less than 5.5. The soil should be
removed to a depth no less than 2.0 feet.
3) Additional soil samples should be collected proceeding soil excavation to establish
that all contaminated soils have been removed.
4) Soils resulting from the excavation should be stock piled oii a plastic sheet for
aeration or should be transported to a county landfill once the Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) authorizes disposal of such soils.
5
I J
I ,
;
0 J
D J
D J
R J
u 7 .. '
m 11
. ,I
I .]
• J • ]
I ]
I :I
I ]
I :I
I :1
I ·11
'
I :11
I .l!
'
AITACHMENT I
Vicinity Map
I
I
I
u
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/ I /
// . i(=
\ ""
·· ..
;
'-l. .· ·-------·-. ~.... ~ . ....... •~ ··:···········:•·:···:-; .....
' . ·-... ·0· ..... ,.,.. . ' . . !✓ --. -,
NORTH
VICINITY MAP
HALLIBURTON SERVICES
3219 NORTHSIDE DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE: DRAl.'N BY:
l"=0.5miles JSJ
CHECKED BY: DATE:
10/5/90
PROJECT NO.
35/08480
7
i I I
! I
---------·
.... -··-..
FlCURE NO.
ATTACHMENT I
g 7
I 1
u 7
~
D J
u J
D J
n J
D J
0 J
I J.
I J
m 1
~
I J
I J
I 1 --
1 J
I I J
I J
I J
ATTACHMENT II
Site Diagram
I -J
g I
g J .,
g J
'
u J
'
D J
'
D J 'I
D JI
D JI
0 d
D ~
D J.
H J
D J.
u J.
D J
I ~
I _,
I J
ATTACHMENT III
Core Locations
u J
I I
I ~
a ~
m ~
m j
n ~ -• ~
m ~ ,-:-
m I
I II
I II
I ,-
I~ I
I~ I I
I IC
l
SHOPPING CENTER
r:0 ESHAH LAKE ROA:D
C-12 C-26
SCRAPED
AREA c-1G-~o
PHOSPHORIC
ACID TANK
HCL TAKKS
1_;, ~IC-25
I';:::'. • C-27 e ~ C-17
D e C-28
e C-29
C-16 •
(:)
FORMER SITE
OF DIESEL FUEL ~ ' C-24 • • AST ·. ,·
C-18
SHOWER C-23 C-19
~ . o· ~-30
C-8 C-22 C-20
C-9· • I e
C-32 e • C-31 __ ~O~R_SITE
WI\STE pIL ..lC-21
(.ACT), 9\
C-15
• C-14
OF C-13 • .....
EMPTY I
I
I
l
I
I
HALLIBURTON
SITE
l OFFICE I
NORTHSIDE DRIVE
• C-33
WELL
HOUSE O
.,
' -
C ,. -c., •
C-4 •
'
C-6
• c~
• C-2
C-7 • • C-1
I I ~ CORE SAMPLE 'LOCATION s
HALLIBURTON SERVICES ATEC Environmental Consultants
3219 NORTHSIDE DRIVE
I MLEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
I
11...f SCALE: DRAIIN BY:
I I l "=50' ---JSJ
I
CHI:CUD BY: DATE:
10/5/90
V . Dlvl1lon of ATEC Auoclalu, Inc.
681.( Davis Clrcle
Ralelgh, Nonh C1toGn1 27613
(91D) 782·2832 RtJtigh
[phone] FAX
PROJECT HO.
35-08480
· rtCURE NO.
ATTACHMENT 3
'
D ~
g -
I ~
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J AITACHMENT IV
I J PID Results
I
I J
IJ
I J
IJ
IJ
I J
11
I ..
I J
I
I
I PHOTOIONIZATION DETECTOR RESULTS
1:1 PID
' Core# Soil Description Depth Reading (ppm)
1'.I C-1 upper fine-low med 12"-16" 7.0
. JI orange brown sand
•1! C-2 upper fine-low med 12"-16" 12.0
orange brown sand 1; C-3 upper fine-low med 12"-16" . 60.0
orange brown sand
•1 C-4 low medium brown sand 12"-16" 42.0
m; C-5 low medium brown sand 12"-16" 62.0
C-6 low medium brown sand 12"-16" 92.0 I. J C-7 low medium brown sand 12"-16" 15.0
mJ C-8 low medium brown sand 12"-16" 14.0
•-C-9 low medium brown sand 12"-16" 18.0
i C-10 low medium brown sand 12"-16" < 1.0 -
IJ C-11 low medium dark brown 12"-16" < 1.0
sand I C-12 J low medium dark brown 12"-16" < 1.0
11 sand
C-13 low medium red-brown 12"-16" 20.0 -
IJ
sand
C-14 low medium red-brown 12"-16" 2.0
I sand
7 C-15 low medium light-brown 12"-16" 1.0
OJ sand
D ,
I -
I
I -PHOTOIONIZATION DETECTOR RESULTS (Continuation)
I ~I
PID
Core# Soil Description Depth Reading (ppm)
I C-16 low medium red-brown 12"-16" < 1.0
JI sand
m J' C-17 low medium red-brown 12"-16" < 1.0
sand
I C-18 low medium red-brown 12"-16" < 1.0
J sand
I J C-19 low medium grey-brown 12"-16" < 1.0
sand
I J C-20 low medium grey-brown 12"-16" < 1.0
sand
H C-21 low medium red-brown 5.0" < 1.0
J sand w/red clay
D J C-22 low medium brown sand 12"-16" < 1.0
D C-23 low medium brown sand 12"-16" < 1.0
J C-24 · low medium dark brown 12"-16" < 1.0
D J C-25 low medium grey-brown 12"-16" < 1.0
D sand
J C-26 low medium orange-brown 12"-16" < 1.0
g sand
J C-27 low medium orange-brown 12"-16" < 1.0
I sand
J C-28 low medium brown sand 12"-16" < 1.0 • 7 C-29 low medium red-brown 12"-16" < 1.0
sand
I J C-30 fine red-brown sand 12"-16" 26.0
I J
PHOTOIONIZATION DETECTOR RESULTS (Continuation)
PID
Core# Soil Description Depth Reading (ppm)
C-31 low medium grey sand 12"-16" .·> 1.0
C-32 medium brown-grey sand 12"-16" 1.0
C-33 fine light brown sand 12"-16" 1.0
C-34 low medium orange-brown 12"-16" > 1.0
sand
ATTACHMENT V
pH Contamination Map
Ti
17
T1
11
11 ,-,
IJ
I
1111
IJ
IJ
IJI
I)
1]1
I 11
14
i~ .J ·~ ·~ 1J _, .~
PHOSPHORIC
"ACID AST
HCL AST' s
FORMER SITE OF
DIESEL FUEi, AST
SHOIIER
-0 ~SOIL
0 0 ~-29(3.5)
,_ C-24
-
-
C-30
(4. 3)
•-(5: 7)
SHOPPING CENTER
C-18 • ( 4. 2)
(9.0)
• C-16
8
(4.2) • C-15
C-13 (6.5)
•
EMPTY I HALLIBURTON
I
I
I
I
SERVICES
; I OFFJ:CES I
FENCE I
I
!
I
I
NORTHStDE DRIVE
\/ELL
HOUSE
(4 .4)
•
C-6
-
-
I
'
I ~ I pH CONTAMINATION ATEC Environmental Consultants
· HALLIBURTON SERVICES
' '219 NORTHSIDE DRIVE I JI AALEIGH' NORTH CAROLINA ,1 s~~~o•·-··-DU~;Y:
CHECKED BY: DATE:
10/5/90
WY, , Division of ATEC AMocl1l11, Inc. '--T ~ 68 U Davis Cite le
Ra'eigh, North Carollna 27613
(91'1) 7B2•2832 Raleigh
(919) 781,7558 F>:X.
PROJECT HO.
35-08480
-FICURE HO.
ATTACHMENT V
IJ
Ii
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
11
'~ IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
I J
IJ
ATTACHMENT VI
TPH Contamination Map
-
GRESttArl "r •DAD
l
NORTH
PHOSPHORIC
ACTD AST
HCLAST's
FORMER SITE OF
DIESEL FUEi, AST
• 1 C-10 39.9ppm -0 ~SOIL
0
0
,--
-
SHOI/ER © • C-30 4180ppm
SHOPPING CENTER
C-13 66. 2ppm
•
EMPTY
FENCE
I · HALLIBURTON
I
I
I
I
I
SERVICES
I I OFFICES I
I
I/ELL
HOUSE . .
I TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATION
-HALLIBURTON SERVICES
3219:NORTHSIDE DRIVE I I RALEIGH' NORTH CAROLINA
j SCALE: DRAIIN BY:
? JSJ
I 1"=50'
CHECKED BY: DATE:
10/5/90
0
PROJECT NO. 35-08480
-
-
FlCURE HO. ATTACHMENT V
' I i
I
!
i
! '
' .
I
I
I
I
I. '
I
I
I·
I;
J
lj
I
_j
IJ
IJ
IJ
: I J
IJ
IJ
IJ
I J
IJ
ATTACHMENT VII
Analytical Results
I
I
IJ
I J
I J
IJ
I l
IJ
IJ
D
j
BJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
11
I J
1•J
ATES Environmental
" S~n'?~r~}!~~~lnc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066·6299
(404] 427-9456. FAX # (404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction·
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing/ Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT#: 1193
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX: Soil.
METHOD: EPA 9045
UNITS: pH units
09078
SAMPLE I.D. STATION
11203
11204
.11207
11209
11210
11213
11214
11215
11216
11217
C-01
C-03
C-06
C-08
_C-09
C-13
C-14
C-15
C-16
C-17
ND-None Detected
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
PARAMETER
pH
5.3
5.0
4.4
5.5
5.0
6.5
4.7
4.2
9.0
4.6
10/02/90
10/03/90
~~ CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental, Geotechnical and
Materials Engineers
I .,
I
I ..
I ' ' ; ..
I 7 I . ·-i
I 7 '
I 7
•
0 I •
u J
•
I ]
I •
I l
I J
I i
I J
I J
I .J
D 7
•
ATE€ Environmental V ~~n~~Tttc1!~!:!~lnc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
[404] 427-9456, FAX # [404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
UnderQround Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing/ Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene /Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT-#: 1193
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX:
METHOD:
UNITS:
Soil
EPA 9045
pH units
09078
SAMPLE I.D. STATION
11218
11219
11224
11225
11226
11227
11228
11229
11230
C-18
C-19
C-24
C-25
C-26
C-27
C-28
C-29
C-30
ND-None Detected
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
PARAMETER
pH
4.2
4.5
5.7
4.7
4.6
4.7
4.6
3.5
4.3
10/02/90
10/03/90
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental, Geotechnical and
Materials Engineers
I
I
I
I
I i j
I ' J
m
0 l
I l
I
I l
I 7
I l
I 7
I l
I l
I l
I l
I J
ATE€ Environmental Vf' ~n'?~r~1!~~~1nc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
[404] 427-9456, FAX # [404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing/ Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: '35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT#: 1193
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD: EPA 9045
UNITS: pH units
09078
SAMPLE I.D. STATION
11231
11232
11233
11234
ND-None
C-31
C-33
C-34
GW#l
Detected
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cilies!Since 1958
DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
PARAMETER
pH
5.1
5.5
5.2
5.5
10/02/90
10/03/90
2~Lf~
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consutring Environmental, Geotechnical and
Materials Engineers
I
I
I
I J
I J
I J
R J
I J
I J
I J
I J
ATE€ Environmental
"" £~n'!~T~1!~!?~1nc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
[404] 427-9456. FAX # [404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos' Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing I Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT #: 1193
INVOICE PROJECT#: 09078
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD: Mod. EPA 8015
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm)
DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
10/02/90
10/03/90
SAMPLE I.D. STATION DETECTION
LIMIT
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
.11203 C-1
11204 C-3
11205 C-4
11206 C-5
11207 C-6
11208 C-7
11217 C-17
ND-None Detected
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 195B
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
CONC. RANGE
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.3 DIESEL
ND
7.7 DIESEL
~~t~
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental, Georechnical and
Materials Engineers
I
I
I
I I
I J
I J
I J
0 J
I 1
I
I l
I l
ATE€ Environmental
~ ~~n~~T~1!~!:?~Jnc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
[404] 427-9456. FAX # [404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management·
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing /Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT#: 1193
INVOICE PROJECT#: 09078
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD: Mod. EPA 8015
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm)
DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 10/02/90
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 10/03/90
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
SAMPLE I.D. STATION DETECTION
LIMIT
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
11220 c-20 5 11221 c-21 5 11222 C-22 5 11223 C-23 5
11226 C-26 5 11233 C-34 5 11234 GW#l 0.5
ND-None Detected
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Of/ices in Major U.S. Cities! Since 1958
CONC. RANGE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental, Geotechnical and
Materials Engineers
I
I \
I J
I J
I J
I J
I l • ]
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
ATEe Environmental 'W ~n~~T~
1
!~~~1nc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
(404] 427-9456. FAX # (404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing/ Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT #: 1193
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD: EPA 418.1
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm)
09078 DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
10/02/90
10/03/90
SAMPLE :I.D. STATION DETECTION
LIMIT
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
.11203 C-1 5
11211 C-10 5
11212 c-11 5
11213 C-13 5
11219 C-19 5
11229 C-29 5
11230 C-30 5
11234 GW-#1 0.5
ND-None Detected
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
ND
39.9
ND
66.2
ND
ND
4,180
ND
RA.'ID BRO
CHEMISTR LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental, Geotechnical and
Materials Engineers
L.--'. __J
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
Jo/I IX l>(
(,3
CY. -
r' L
r10
Cl
C 13
(' 14-
,,.. i-h -, .
~ 17 • )
11 elinqulshed b : (Slgnarura} _
L--1 fl -I/ '\---\.,, ✓, ¥'lv-,.-
~inqulshLd l'y: (Signature} Date/ Time
__J
Cl) u.a:
0 0 ow
UJ UJ a:~
a: u:: UJ <(
UJ 0 0
a,,-
I-::.z
..J i3 UJ :::io u:: <( 9 zu
)(
' Received by: (Signature}
Rec~;;{f. for Leb7tory by:
(Slgfi;~l)~
offi _,a, a,::; :s~
Ix
X
IX
)(
Relinquished by: (Signature}
'
X
>(
Ix
X
x'.. Ix
X
Iv
Date /Time
Date/ Time Project Manager / Phone #:
/q,{i/Jo
Received by: (Signature}
--- --- ----11!!!1 == == -&iii liiii ---
I
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
1s-oi'-\~° CLIENT \-\ t:.. ~ \ ~ \-iu ('-'r'(J'(\
SA~PLERSr[Slgnalu~·
J--::~t--V ·. ~~
SAl,11 LINS METHOD ...,. '-. .
\\.AJ--l O 'f-\U G< '<
SAMPLE
1.0.NO.
C-l'\
(-.'.25
6-W-=ll I
DATE TIME
a: w
i ..J
6 1/)
0 w a: w ~ u:
r . , ' ~HAIN m-' CU.in.._ f 11'1:;CORD ,____. . '_j
1/) u.a:
0 ow w a:;!; cffi u: W<(
ci alt-. al
0 ::!Z iii::! ti w :::,Q
<( !,1 zu :5~
I><.
Ix
)<
"
IX
X
X
Ix.
x. X
IX:IX
X
Relinquished by: (SI nalura} Date I Time Received by: (Signature} Relinquished by: /Signature} Date /.Time
~ ,__;1ml .. e~qu sl edlb~Slgnature} bale /Time d for Libor ory by:
re} (
(/;ftdn.,
I
Date/ Time Project Manager/ Phone #:
1q£z/;o
[__J ..J
Received by: (Signature}
ATTACHMENT VIII
Photo Documentation
I
I
I
I;
IJ
I J
1 1
I 1
' I
I l HYDROCHLORIC ACID TANKS AND AREA OF pH CONTAMINATION.
I
I l
I
I l
I l
I
I
I J
D
GULLEY NEAR SHOWER WITH BOTH pH AND PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION.
H
I
I
I J
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
• J
11
11
11
11
01
I l
DJ
m J
I J
FOLIAGE DEATH AND SOIL DISCOLORATION AT CORING NO. 15 .
PARKING AREA AND PROPERTY LINE AREA.
LOCATION OF ISOLATED pH CONTAMINATION.
I
I l
SAFETY SHOWER AND CORNER OF AST ISLAND WHERE CONTAMINATION WAS FOUND.
VIEW OF PARKING AREA AND STOCKPILED SOIL.
AREA OF pH CONTAMINATION.
I 1
'.11
I 7
I 1 :■
I 1 ..
I l :•
I l ·a
I 7 ..
I J
IJ
I :•
I J
I J
I J
n J
D J
I J
I J
I J
I J
FORMER LOCATION OF WASTE OIL STORAGE TANK.
VIEW OF PARKING AREA AND FACILITY.
I 1
I ,
I J
I J
I J
IJ
I
IJ
IJ
I _J
IJ
g
IJ
IJ
0 _;
IJ
IJ
IJ
•=
.. •---. ----·-··--·----·----
HYDROCHLORIC ACID TANK AND LOCATION OF FORMER DIESEL FUEL AST.
HYDROCHLORIC ACID ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS AND PARKING AREA.
11
11 •
11 -
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
I ""
IJ
I]
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
UJ
EXTERIOR OF ACID AST AREA.
PARKING AREA WITH pH CONTAMINATION.
I
I
I J
I J
I J
I J
I
I J
I J
I
I l
I J
I l
I 1
I J
I J
g J
D J
DRAINING OF HCL TANK AND
FOOTING FOR FORMER DIESEL.
SAFETY SHOWER IN VICINITY
OF pH AND TPH CONTAMINATION.
I J
I l
I J
I J
I J
I J
I 1
_J
I J
I l
I J
I J
I J
I J
FOLIAGE DEATH AND SOIL DISCOLORATION NEAR SAFETY SHOWER.
I J
I 1
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I -
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I =
I ~
I -
APPENDIX B
SOIL ANALYSIS RESULTS
pH RESULTS
TPH RESULTS
TCLP RESULTS
I J
I 1
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I
I J
I J
I J
0
0, -
D -
I
ATEe Environmental
" £~n~~T~c1!~~~1nc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Mariena, Georgia 30066-6299
[4041 427-9456. FAX # (404] 427·1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessmen1s
Remedial Design & Conslruclion
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys &'Analysis ·
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing /Chemislry
Industrial Hygiene /Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT j: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT #: 1193
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD: EPA 9045
UNITS: pH units
09078
SAMPLE I.D. STATION
11203
11204
11207
11209
11210
11213
11214
11215
11216
11217
C-01
C-03
C-06
C-08
C-09
C-13
C-14
C-15
C-16
C-17
ND-None Detected
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Ma,ior U.S. Cities/Since 1958
DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
PARAMETER
pH
5.3
5.0
4.4
5.5
5.0
6.5
4.7
4.2
9.0
4. 6
10/02/90
10/03/90
~-J/4.~
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmenlal. Geotechnical and
Materials Engineers
I 1 ..
17 ...
IJ
IJ
IJ
I l .,.
IJ
IJ
I
IJ
11 ,.
dJ
D .J
0
I ..
I ..
ATE€ Environmental
"' S~n~~T~}!~~~lnc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta. Georgia 30066-6299
(404] 427-9456, FAX # [404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Under~round Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing /Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene /Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJ_ECT # : 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT # : 1193
INVOICE PROJECT #:
MATRIX:
METHOD:
UNITS:
Soil
EPA 9045
pH units
09078
SAMPLE I.D. STATION
11218 C-18
11219 C-19
11224 C-24
11225 C-25
11226 C-26
11227 C-27
11228 C-28
11229 C-29
11230 C-30
ND-None Detected
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporatio:--.
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
PARAMETER
pH
4.2
4.5
5.7
4.7
4.6
4.7
4.6
3.5
4.3
10/02/90
10/03/90
,Z~b~
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental. Geotechnical and
Maierials Engineers
J
• J
I J
I J
g, J
D J
D J
I 1
ATEe Environmental
~ ~n~~T~}!~~~lnc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
(404] 427-9456, FAX I! (404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
. Unde,-ground Tank M_anagemeflt
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeotogic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing/ Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
"CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT # : 1193
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX:
METHOD:
UNITS:
Soil
EPA 9045
pH units
09078
SAMPLE I.D. STATION
11231
11232
11233
11234
C-31
C-33
C-34
GW#l
ND-None Detected
A Subsidiary o! Ame1ican Testing and Engineering Corporation
Office.,;. in MAior f/.S. (":itiP..<;./.t:;inr:P. 1958
DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
PARAMETER
pH
5.1
5.5
5.2
5.5
10/02/90
10/03/90
JS~i!~
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental. Geotechnical and
Materials Engineers
_.J L.J c__J c__J
,
C 13
-. \ ,, V
··Date/ Time
\U(t(cto
l~inquishf.d oy: (Signature) Date/ Time
I
' ;___, ,__j _,
ffT!~
CH'" 0 , cusToo, aecoao /
. VJ IL CC
0 ow
0 w cc~ w u:: w <( cc <Of-w i5 0 ::EZ ~ ti w :JO u:: < y Z(.)
><
L
Received by: (Slgnalur•)
Recei~ for Labo'.,9,tory by:
(S/gnapue) /) -J<.
. ffi ciw ;;; ::;
:5~
Ix
IX
X
X
I)(
X
XIX
X
X
v' x
Relinquished by: (Slgnalura) Date/ Time ·-Received by: (Signature)
Date/ Time
,,,i~J.J
Project Manager/ Phone #:
----~--~-----------~ ~ u u u w w w w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Kl
PROJECT NAME LAB PROJ. NO./ I I PROJ. NO.
-;is-oit..\'25"0 H A.\\~ \.u ~o'\\
LABORATORY ANALYSIS f? CLIENT ~
SA,PLERS: (Sig~I
.;{ ;, ,,; . v-0,_ ~ c.,,,, _<.. ,~ !/Jo ,,, "' ii: -· ~ 7 SA~hLIN S METROD ..,.. U) 0" oc., w u. a: o'<' ~ c.,~.t:-c.. ~ \\J\\---l D 'A._u G-<:-< ... 0 ow
iii 0 a::!!: "' .t w w . a: ~~'8lP 0 0 a: a: u: W<( ow ,__":' "' "o -v A."" C;, ~"V a. ID w w 0 ID,-. -'ID " ..,. '<" ::; <( ... .J ~ 0 ::;z ID:; o'" -\-_,,, ,__'<: ,._ ~
SAMPLE 0 w ,__ c.,Q) "'°'. ,__o .I .c , ,,,,. DATE TIME 0 a: <( 6 !,! :::,o '.5~ .:,. ,f;-,__o 1.0.NO. u CJ 3: U) u: <( zu Q
C-\c£ wl i X
(. ~ '\ I ' '/,.__ X. ◄-~· ' ~o I><
c.-::i..\ x (-)
X. -:,:,mcom
(_-.;;,l..'L
<Dru CD-· · .... -_.. < ::::, (0 (ti .l>,. ---
( -;;l;3 X ~~oS·O < co. ., :, ::, ~ z :s. 0 -·
r-.::i.4 X "'o"'-u,-. ~Hi~~cO
(-:J.5 >( .,, ~ "' n -::I
>< .'I-. >~ >-3
I' -;i,b :~ ~ Cl :, 0
(. -:J.1-I><. <O " !:l. ::, (D ~ "' " ~al ii, c:;;-:1
{_-;)<{, l'i -...J-' ~"' ....
co°' Q ~~ :,
(_-J_q'
.. -..J X ...,o f> u,O -"'"' c.-7:,-Q I>< I)( co
c..-~, X:
c.-3:, 11--
c.-,'-\ IX I)(
&w::11.\ -/._ Ii-x
Relinquished by: (SI natura) Date I Time Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) Date I Time Received by: (Signat~re)
~ ,_,;)mt,. ·',,()/ I /q ,
t,'quls ed/J,K£Signaru,eJ bale I Time ~;:71Lzo~ by:
Date I Time Project Manager/ Phone #:
r•J . vc/Jtol l ~ --
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I ..J
I 1
I
DEC-5-91 THU 8:58
•
ATE€ Environmental. ~w £~n~f~T~}!~~~lnc. V 1300 Williams Drive, Silite A
Marie:ta. Georgia 30066-6209
[404) 427-9456. FAX # [40.;J 427·1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Bill Newman
P. 02
Sohd & Ha:!u,ctous Waste Site Assessments
Aemc~ia! ~esign & Construction
Un::lergrou:id Ta:,k ManaQement
As':>C~IOS SL!t'-leys & Analysis
Hydrogeoicgic 1nvesric;alions & Monitoring
A,-aiytica; Testing/Chemislfy
1n.:1us:1:a: Hygiene/Hazard Communicaticn
Envircnmental Audits & Permilling
Ex~:a,atory Oril!ing & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton Facility
LAB PROJECT #: 1304
INVOICE PROJECT#: 09078
MATRIX: Soil
UNITS: pH units
PARAMETER METHOD
PH 9045
ND-None Detected
DATE SAMPLED: 10/29/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 10)30/90
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 10/30/90
DATE REPORT: 11/02/90
SAMPLED I.D.
STATION:
12287
C-30
4. 3
;l:~, t~ ,
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR CHEMISTRY DIVISION
,._ •.• •. ,I•·, •. :-: • . ., , .. ,., , •• : .' ;,, -. •
\ .J
liiiiii1
L.J
liiiii
L..J L..J
liilii
L..J
iiii
L..J -L..J L
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
L...J L...J --•-'---'
:)_
0
PROJECT NAME l-kd li b vr--ro<"' R...c:, \,Ty
CLIENT HC\ \\'. \._,._,,,--o" :S«.\'-.J 'c...c:-._
LAB PROJ. NO./
LABORATORY ANALYSIS ...,.../
15: (Signature)
.E
l.
,, .
DATE
-1.
TIME
o ,o-.:i,-1 ~ '(:oa
,._
w t-
<ii 0 a: 0.. C) w ~ <( t-.J
0 a: <( 0 0 (!) :;: <J>
X
<J> "-a:
0 0 ow
w ~ a:~
a: "-w <(
w mt-
t-0 0 ::EZ
.J ·O w ::>O u: <( " zo
".)__
. (C ow
-' ID C)::;
<(:, ,
.JZ
!:J
iJ?
ff /?;"fr,
__ L.,_J_ _ __j _ __j__j_-1--+--I--H-+-+-'----1--1-t-H-f-t-+-+-l:--t------1
-----1--1-1--1--1----l---+-+--+-+--+--+-+-+-+-+--+-++--t---+-t---,
----1-----l---+-----lf--+--+~f-+--+-t---t----.l-----1----+--le----l-----+--l---l---+-l--+----+------j
liiiil
'---'
shod by: (Signtlluro} Date/ Time Received by: (Signaruro) Relinqul:lhed by: (Signa1uro) Received by: (S1pna1urc)
lshed 'b\-: (Signalure} Dale /I Time Rec~iv ~or La z:ral by: 1s;gn •!
~
Dale/ Time
110/20,4()
Project Manager/ Phone ff:
= • fT"] 0 I
liilil
U7
I
(D
__, = C:
0:,
<.n =
ATE€ Environmental
~ ~n~~T~}!~c~~nc. V · 1300 WIiiiams Drive
Marietta. Georgia 30066-6299
[phone], FAX# [phone]
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Bill Newman
Solid & Hazardous Waste Si1eAssessments
Remedial Design & ConS'JUaian
Underground Tank. Managemeit
Asbestos Surveys & Anz.iysis .
Hydr0geologic ln\18S ligations&. Monitoring
Anal}1i:.al Testing/ Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/ Hazard Communication
Environmental Audlts & Permitting
Exploratory Drllllng & Mo.-iitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton Services
LAB PROJECT#: 1319
INVOICE PROJECT#: 09078
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD:
UNITS:
SAMPLE
I,D.
12349
12350
12351
12352
EPA 9045
pH units
STATION
C-13
C-15
C-16
C-29
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE
SAMPLED: 11/01/90
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
REPORT:
RECEIVED:
ANALYZED:
11/12/90
PARAMETER
PH
4.7
4,5
5.9
3.9
11/02/90
11/08/90
~¾4L
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVIS-:JR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Cons!J1ting Enwfonmental, Ge:ite:cl".nica: and
Materials Eng,:.,eers
--llii liiiiii iiii iill --l!!!!I 111!1 --.. ---liillil
l _ __: L...J '__J L_J \_J \_J ,, l-1 L...J L...J L L..J L... L... L... L... I..-.< L.....
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
' ✓IV"-
1/) u. cc
0 ow
0 UJ cc;,: .a: w u: W<( ow a: a: co,-. . co
UJ UJ ·o 0 :.z .; :. ,-. J ,-. UJ :::io 5i <( 0 J 0 0 ~ 1/) u: <( zo
-to -I. 'I-.
'1· /...
'I. x
'/. x
~-x,
hi " ..
•
Dale/ Time Received by: (Slgn11tureJ Relinquished by: (Slgnoturo) Date/ Tlmo Received by: (Slg~aturo)
\ ' l ' Date/ Time Rec~ive for Laboratory by:
ilinquished by: (Signalwe) J I/
I 't9 '.°lJ1, .. , .. ~ 1; :,,
Date/ Time Project Manager/ Phone U:
11-.J-90l 11.-::,<
.•· = rr1
0
I
en
I
CD
-) = =
co
=
--a = CJ7
11
Ii
11
IJ
IJ
Ii
Ii
B .,
11
11
ll
ATEC Environmental
~ E~n~~T~1!~~~1nc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Mariena, Georgia 30066-6299
[404] 427-9456, FAX # [404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Was le Sile Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing /Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communica1ion
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & MonilOring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT # : 1193
INVOICE PROJECT#: 09078
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD: Mod. EPA 8015
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm)
DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
10/02/90
10/03/90
SAMPLE I.D. STATION DETECTION
LIMIT
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
11203 C-1
11204 C-3
11205 C-4
11206 C-5
11207 C-6
11208 C-7
11217 C-17
ND-None Detected
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporati•:--
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
CONC. RANGE
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.3 DIESEL
ND
7.7 DIESEL
~°'7/iif~
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental, Georechnical and
Materials Engineers
ATE¢ Environmental
'W 9~n~~T~•!~~~lnc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Mariena, Georgia 30066·6299
(404( 427•9456, FAX # (404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management
AsbE!stos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytic~! Testing I Chemistry
Industrial. Hygiene /Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT #: 1193
INVOICE PROJECT #: 09078 DATE
MATRIX: Soil DATE
METHOD: Mod. EPA 8015 DATE
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm) DATE
SAMPLE I.D. STATION DETECTION
LIMIT
11220 C-20 5
11221 C-21 5
11222 C-22 5
11223 C-23 5
11226 C-26 5
11233 C-34 5
11234 GW#l 0.5
ND-None Detected
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineedng Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
SAMPLED: i0/01/90
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 10/02/90
SAMPLE ANALYZED: 10/03/90
REPORT: 10/15/90
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
CONC. RANGE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmef1/al. Geotec.ir.ical and
Materials Engineers
lilil .. liii -!I!! !!!!! l!!!I -
-1 L..J L..J L..J L....J L....J L...J' L-L.....I L...J •~1
'ROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
s-oi<-\'z5"0 cuENT HA-,\\~ 'v.u ('-'f"O'I\
A\)PLER;n: (~Sign•ture) --. ~ _,__
A~~LIN/; METfiOD -...,.-
1,.?J;-J O '{::,,_I..) G-< <
SAMPLE DATE TIME 1.D. NO.
C-\ '6 wl I
c.-\ "\ I
r '.2.0
C :.:i..\
:,w-:11-I
w r-tn 0
Q. ::;
0 0
CD < a: (!)
a: w
i ...J
0 <I)
Cl w a: w I-...J u:
CHAiN OF CUSTODY RECORD
LAB PROJ. NO./
<I) u. a:
Cl ow
w a::?, . a: u: . w-,: c,W
5 CD r-• CD
Cl ::;z iii ::; w 0 0 ::>O :5~ < zo
Ix
Ix
lc~_:::Jished by;Si ~•t11r•J
/J -~ /,, rr,I ~• .
Date I Time Received by: (Signature) -Relinquished by: (Slgnat11re)
liiii1 liiiil &ii iiii
(__J (__J ,__, ,__,
X
IX
IX
I.>(
Ix
1---
Date ,
1
Time Received by: (Sfgnat~reJ
Project Manager/ Phone tt:
liiii liiiil ,__,
DEC-5-91 THU 8:57
·?Aree E11vit6nmental . · ~·~. Consultants
Division of AT~C A,;~oclates, Inc.
1300 Williams Dnve, Su,le A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
[4041 427-9456, FAX II [404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: ,Bill Newman
P. 01
Sond & Hazardous WMle ~Assessments
Remedial Design & Con.si:don
Underground Tank Mana~
Asbestos Surveys & An2!/SS
Hydrogeok>gic lnvesliga:.a;:s.& at.onitori'lg
Analytical Testl ng / Cherr~stry
lnduslrial Hygiene/ Haz.2-: Ccmmunicalion
Environmenlal Audits & Pe,-miUing
EJtploralory Orilllng & Mo-!".::x,ring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton Facility
LAB PROJECT#: 1304
INVOICE PROJECT#: 09078
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD: Modified 8015 (P&T)
UNITS: lllg/kg (ppm)
DATE SAMPLED: 10/29/90 ·.
DATE SAMPLE RECKIVED: 10/30/90
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 10/30/90
DATE REPORT: 11/02/90
SAMPLE I.D. STATION DETECTION
LIMIT
PARAHETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBOXS
12287 C-30 5
ND-None Detected
CONC. RANGE
125
C
CHEMISTRY
Diesel
RATORY SUPERVISOR
DIVISION
I l
I J
I l
I l
I ,l
l
I l
I l
I I
I ' 7
I J
I ~
Environmental
Consultants
Oivisio11 of ATEC Associates, Inc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta. Georg!a 30066-6299
l404! 427-9456. FAX# l404} 427-1907
Solid & Hazardous Was:e Site Assassr.,ents
Remedial Design & Construclion
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeo\ogic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing /Chemistry
Industrial HygieneiHazard Communicat1on
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Explomtory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Jim King
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT # : 1193
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD: EPA 418.1
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm)
09078 DATE SAMPLED: 10/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 10/15/90
10/02/90.
10/03/90
SAMPLE I.D. STATION DETECTION PARAMETER
LIMIT
11203 C-1 5
11211 C-10 5
11212 C-11 5
11213 C-13 5
11219 C-19 5
11229 C-29 5
11230 C-30 5
11234 GW-#1 0.5
ND-None Detected
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
ND
39.9
ND
66.2
ND·
ND
4,180
ND
RAND BRO
CHEMISTR LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental. Geoiechnical ar;d
'•-,-.;~i,. i=ni-inAAIS
--Ila iili liili --l!!!!!!!I !l!!!I -== -i;;;;i liiiil -liiiii1 liiil liiii iiil
L....! ~ ' _, ' --., ..._,, ..._,, .._, ' . ' .__; t......,' ..__.. 1-...1
,OJ. NO.
SAMPLE
1.0. NO.
PROJECT NAME
0 0 UJ UJ ii: a: UJ i5 ,... 0 _,
ii: <
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
(/) u. a: QUJ
a:~ . a:
UJ< ow a,,... . a,
0 ::;z ;;;::;
UJ ::, 0 '.S~ S1 zu
>< /o/1
.
n -·u
C 13
(',,14
.c ,1,5
· C, I+--, ,,
f ellnqulshed bv: (Slgnalur•J
'~~,/~~
IV
Dete / Time
\LJ(t{qo
Date/ Time
I
Received by: (Slgnaluro)
ReceivW for Labon}tory by:
tC:/r,n<;>fifrP1 /1 /
X
IX
Relinquished by: (Slgnalur•J
IX
IX:.
l>Z
X
XI><
X
o·ate Time
Date/ Time
I , I · I Project Manager/ Phone ti:
c-fJ IL-
Received by: (Signature)
DEC-5-91 THU 9:00
ATEe Environmental
1\W ~n~~T~C~~c~~nc. V 1300 Wiliiams Dl'hte
Mariella, Georgia 30066-6299
[phone], FAX# [phone]
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Bill Newman
P. 04
Solid & Ha0zardous Waste Sile Assessments
Remedial Design & Constrl.!clion
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing/ Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/ Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton Services
LAB PROJECT#: 1319
INVOICE PROJECT#: 09078
MATRIX: Soil
DATE SAMPLED: 11/01/90
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/02/90
METHOD: Modified 8015 (P&T) DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/08/90
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm)
SAMPLE STATION
:r • D •
12348
12349
C-10
C-13
ND-None Detected
DATE REPORT: 11/12/90
DETECTION
LIMIT
5
5
PAR1\M.ETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
CONC. RANGE
ND
ND
BOil,ATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
-iili ---!!!ii! !!!!I I!!!! 1111111 m= == =m ;a; 1iii111 i1iiii1 1ii1i1 i1ii1 1iiiiii1 iii!
'_j '_J _J LJ L..J L-.J L...,J. .. L-J L-.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
10.
0
PROJECT NAME t-tc.. l l i b '-' f-t"<>("\ ~--\,-';-y
CLIENT He\\\( \.-u , ... or-. -s~<'-J ~C..C'
'.RS: (Signature)
\ ~I. ,._ /l'C ~ ..
NG MrtHOb--'
\ ~v';\c:.✓
LE TIME '.l. DATE
0 IQ•.J'I•~ b Lf:oO
shod by: (Signatwo}
ished ~',signature)
w ,-.
in o· a:
Q. ID w ::; < ,-..J
0 a: < 0 () e:> :;: (/)
X
Date/ Time
£0-'l.1·"CO 11..\ :oO
Date 'i Time
(/) u. a:
0 0 ow
w w a:;;:: a: u. W<
w i5 ID 1--,-. 0 ::;z
..J 0 w ::>O u: < ~ zu
-::)_
Received by: (Slgn,,ture)
Rec~iv ~or La z:rat by: (Sign eJ
~
cffi , ID ;;; ::; < :::, ..JZ
Aellnqulnhed by: (Signaturo} Date/ Time
Data /Time
0/2ahol
Project Manager/ Phone ff:
L....I L....I L....I
Received by: (Signature}
L-.
C, • rr,
0 I
U7
I
CD
--l ::c C:
CD
<.n =
--------11!!1!!1 l!!!!!l!!I I!!!!! 1111!1!1 == m= ;;;; ;;;a &iiiiiil --L.J L. L.J L_J L_J L.J !' L_J L..; L_J L L..... L...J [_ L.... L..... L..... i__, CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD 10J. NO. I PROJECT ~AME ~°' \ ,~ 'Q ..... ,w <") ~\c, '-'..,,___Y ,--O~\.\<&O CLIENT \-\_c,,._\\, Y.,u("~G(\ S::c:'\l,("(:'._.2 1MPLEAS: tSignatu1cJ I ,.JrJr IV"-w ... D in 0 w uJ ~--0 a: a: u. a. "' w w 5 SAMPLE I DATE 1 TIME 1 8 <( ... _, ... 0 a: <( 6 _, G UJ 1.D. NO. (.'J ;: II) ii: <( 9 c-io I I•\. ;:-__:J \ -\. 'I-,, -I '/.. !---_ ' i. (/) u.a: ow a:Z .a: UJ<( ow w,-_,w ::;z "'::; ::>O s~ zo LAB PAOJ. NO./ LABORATORY ANAL~S ,~ t> G° ~ 0 ... rr-p ,,,o ~ 0 ... ~o .,,_o Ov.,.¼+"' /,._~ ~ I/~ ~ ,,, I ,._o 1/ i "' ~ /tq ~ /)(/~ I)( • ~ .;;-'<" 4!i "'' ,._<? 0'<" 0 V "' <l.v .;;-"' ... ib 9<l, ~~' ~(-) ~ . / , ~ 00111,(IKI j j I ~11 I 1111111 f j@~•:~;!H~I. "';:,. o> v, 0 "' :r =;· -c C I )(J _ _kOl'.1..1.,{·=.,.:o, [ ' l • tllnquished bv.: (Signature) --\-\~~~,..,.._ Dale/ Time I Received by: /Slgnstu10) \\-\-'\C J-::i:cc,!j,\ ,tinquished b)•: (Signature) Date/ Time I Aec~lve for Laboratory by: rs;g re) J/ . L ~ . ·/ Relinquished by:/ Signature) Data I Tim~ Date/ Time I Project Manager/ Phone u: 11-.:i-9r:, I 11.-s< J'-J o m -n~ron-:1 ►~ ►-3 :~ ~ a ~ 0 <D " 0 ::::s IT\ __. N ~-,., "' °' --::::s -a, "' ---A~ -""en-+ "'. -a ~"' ~ ' 0 0 .... 0 . ~"' -0, Received by: (Slg~aturoJ 1-C, rn G I (5 I cc :r C cc C :-c' = Ul
DJ
DJ
0]
IJ
IJ
m J .]
I
.I
I J
I J
I J
IJ
I 1
I 1
R1
I J
I J
.. .
Alt:e Environmental w ~n~?T~~~~~nc. V 1300 Williams Drive
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
[phone], FAX# [phone]
Soiid &.Hazardous Waste Site AssCSDDents
Remedial Design &. Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations & Mo~g
Analytical Testing/ Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Haza:-dCommunication
Environmental Audits & Perminino
Exploratory Ori/ling & Monitoring Welts
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Bill Newman
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-07023 Halliburton Phase II
LAB PROJECT#: 1345
INVOICE PROJECT f: 09078
MATRIX: Soil
DATE SAMPLED: 11/12/90
METHOD: EPA Modified 8015
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm)
.SAMPLE
I.D.
12719
12720
12721
12722
12723
12724
12725
12726
STATION
B-1
B-2
B-3
B-4
B-5
B-6
B-7
B-8
ND-None Detected
DETECTION
LIMIT
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/13/90
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/14/90
DATE REPORT: 11/16/90
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
CONC, RANGE
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
--liiii I!!!!!!! l!!l!!I
• • I__J I__J L-1 L-1 IL...J L._j ........i ~ ~ ,L
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
~ I I. NO. PROJECT NAME H. °' \ \ .' bv ,n::, "' ()W',-5<:_ I I LAB PROJ. NO./ 0
LABORATORY ANAL Ys1s.""'
070~ ~ fJ
CLIENT \:°\o.__\\ ~ Y,)v'l"-'\OY', ~ ~, ~ ...
'LERS: (Signature) ii!-"' ~<,;
~·Ao~ 0"' 'bo G:, --ii!-'
~ ~ ~ <ii" .!) " 0"" c,'<" ,__..-G:, ,_ ,__
'LING METI'fUO U) . 0 "' ~ I,.., c,'<"
uJ u. a: 0~ Q~ ~ ,1..,,.Y-A...l.. o' 0
\,A I-0 QuJ "' .t C, "' ' ~
in 0 a:;;:: . a: ~ ~ ·'S "' u, w "" "' 0 a: ffi ii: •. W<( ow "o .;:, A..v-,,_~ a,,--' a, ,__ ~ ,G:, I Q. a, w 25 0 :::.z a,:::. ;r .,," ,__..-,__ ~ ~ :::. <( I-J t-~ q· O If-., ... MPLE <( i5 J u w :::,Q :'i~ .,_O ,{;-;._O tq· J.;,, ,0 DATE TIME 0 a: ~ zo "-l. NO. 0 l') ,; U) ii: <(
I /t-12.-'11 I 1-/_,'LO X X ;Z ◄~' I l ll X x. y..
-z_ ---1.... 3-:o&:l m
·.3 ,, " )( X I · 0 --------i-----·-X i-. \\J < r·u-o_tl_Q -L/ II LC X: ·-JJO>oom x -1,_ <D~a>-. ---< :J
-5 ,1 X !B.~ . .r,.. ~-II -.,,g. o o· 0 <
,-? I( II X X: 'I.._ ~~ ~-~ ::, -·
11' ,_,z.,,_cn"",t
';( x' a,O Ol> 0
-7 / I I I "'::i -· ... C y 'I-·"' ::r O lT1 ::,
--<6 ti f I .i-. -,,Oron-►~ ► .... 3 =~ ~ a i.l o CD ·-'§ N B•:::, ~~ [ ct:, ...... _. ~ -+
a,W 0 ... rG 5"
..., 0 !' -"'0 "' "' a, .
,quished by_: (Signature) Date I Time Received by; (S1gn,1ture) Relinquished by; (S1gna1ure) Dale 1Tima Received by: (Slgnaluru)
,.,1---v:::~N\ \\·\2·'\0 l<-t.'~O
nql'lis e~..;,_( ignarure} Date/ Time Receivjd for Laboratory by: Date/ Time I Project Manager/ Phone U:
I (Sinnat re) , • ,, ,,.c,-:--..1 ,,
~
,:c:;, rn 0 I
t.T1
I CD
--l :I:
C
= = (;J
. DEC-5-91 THU 9:04
ATE€ Environmental W ~n~~T~}~~~lnc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
(404] 427-9456, FAX# [404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Bill Newman
Solid & Hazardolls Was:e SiteAs:.e.ss~
Remedial Design & Construc!ion
Underground Tank Mar.aJemcnt
Asbeslos Surveys & Ar\atysis
Hydmgeologic lnves:iga1:ons & Monitomg
Analytical Testing/ Chemistry
Industrial Hygicne/Haiard Commcnic~
Environmenlal Audils & Per!Tbttlng
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring ~'le-:ls
CLIENT PROJECT f: 35-07023 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT#: 1436
INVOICE PROJECT f: 08246 DATE SAMPLED: 11/27/90
MATRIX: Soil DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/28/90
METHOD: EPA Mod. 8015 (P&T) DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/29/90
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm)
SAMPLE
J:. D •
13639
STATJ:ON DETECTION
LJ:MIT
MW-1 5
DATE REPORT: 12/03/90
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM.HYDROCARBONS
CONC, RANGE
114 Diesel
~~,6~~
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
-. I I.
PLE
~o. DATE
I
I
j
I I
I
-
TIME
-\ . .J --t .... .J
0 UJ a: Ill ...J I-6 ...J
(/) u:
!X
t .J l__j j_J j_ j__J j
iiiii l!!l!!!I
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
(/) u. a:
0 ow
UJ a:;;; ·ffi . Ill<{ u. m,... ~m 0 0 ::;z "'::; u UJ ::>O < ::, < ~ zu ...JZ
x:· \
IL_l----+--i-+--+-+---H-t-+-l-t---t--t-rt-t-H1H1-1
I
.
1ished by: (Sl9nat11re)
iO, J--o~
Date/ Time Received by: (S,gntJtura)
\l-:I?-i.01 '3 :oo
Relinquished by; (Sign/Huro) Received by: (SlgnatweJ Date 1 Timo
1lstie8..hj,: (S;gnalure) D t / Tme Rec~!~Jd for Laboratory by:
a e
1
, (S;g'l;t':•! ,
x-u~ ✓J, .,. .,i 1 L , ",....,
Date/ Time Project Manager/ Phone u:
''l-.2.r-,01 r::z._·&>
--I
= C'7 0 I
a,
I <D
--, = C:
<D = a,
-u = =
DEC-5-91 THU 9: 10
ATE€ Environmental V ~n~f~T~c
1!~~~1nc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
[404[ 427-9456, FAX# [404] 427-1907
P. 11
Solid & HAzardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Cons1ruc1ion
Underground Tank Management
Asbeslos Surveys/!. Anillysis
Hydrogeologic lnvestigatio:i~ & Moni!cri"'9
Analytical Testing I Chemislty
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communlca!ion
Environmental Audits & Permitling
Exploratory Ori:ting & Moniloring Wells
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Waheed Rana
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-07023
LAB PROJECT#: 1611
Halliburton Services
INVOICE PROJECT #: 08246
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD: Modified 8015
Purge
UNITS: mg/kg
SAMPLE I.D.
15130
15131
15132
& Trap
(ppm)
STATION
SP-1
SP-4
SP-2
ND-None Detected
Reviewed by: uJ¼-Kim Humphries~
DATE
DATE
DATE
DATE
DETECTION
LIMIT
5
5
5
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineerinc Corooratinn
SAMPLED: 01/21/91
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/25/91
SAMPLE ANALYZED: 02/01/91
REPORT: 02/04/91
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
CONc·, RANGE
ND
ND
209
RANDY ROWN
Diesel
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR CHEMISTRY DIVISION
iiiiiil
LJ -L..J
liiiiiiii
LJ
liiiiiR
"L-.J
liiij
LI
liiii
L....J
iiiiiil-
L....J
iiiil
L
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
liiiiE\ . iiiiil iliiii, iiiiii
..._j I__J L-..J L-..J -[._j liiiii . -L-.J _j
PROJECT NAME fl f/-lL t" f!,t,,.1"-. TOAi LAB PROJ. NO./ I
~ CLIENT
:; METHOD w
/+'o !:: 0 D w "' w u: 0 a: a: 0. al w w 0 ::;; <( ... ...J ... 0 0 a: <( i5 ..J
DATE TIME ~ u: <( u <.!) "'
IC• 1/-;..I /11 ~ 1' X
'JJ I);;,./ h, Pm /.... X
Ii-> I /;,.J /'Ji tr1 y ;< X
'
VJ u. a: ow
a:~ .a: W<( ow -al ... ...,al
D ::iz al::;; w :,o <(:, ~ zu ...JZ
,>( :L
x 1__
x .J_
LABORATORY ANALYSIS ,;;-"' <c ~" ,ft)
' ~ ,__, ,.r
0
J..
I-
I-
~
_...,
m9S' I
If,., 11,_
'J''I
n -~ I>; ,
'L. j_ _ __(___WH--1--1--1-+-+-+-+-if-t-+-+-t-t-rrrrr---1
•
:'led by: (Signaturo) Date/ Time Received by: (Sign/Huro) · Relinquished by: (SigniitureJ Dale ,
1
TirnP Recoived by: (Sig11a1ure)
. red by: (Signature)
I
Date/ Time Received for Laborat< fY by: /SA~-~~ 0
Date IT' " Project Manager/ Phone #:
/~c; lulX>
' ,
liilil ,__,
• 0
[Tl
0 I
u,
I co
--4 :c c::
=
=
"-'
-■• -.......... ■111111 •..............
Consultants
Division of ATEC Associates, Inc.
1300 Wiiliams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Gaorgia 30066·6299
[404} 427-9456, FAX # [404J 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Waheed Rana
SOiid &. Haiardous Waste Si:e Assessments
Aemed:al Design & Constru::.tion
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Jnves:igations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing /Chemis1ry
lndus\ri~I Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audi1s & Permi!ting
Exp!o:atory Driiiing & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-07023 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT # : 1720
INVOICE PROJECT #: 08246 DATE SAMPLED: 02/20/91
MATRIX: Soil DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 02/22/91
METHOD: Modified 8015 DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 03/01/91 Purge & Trap
UNITS: rng/kg (ppm) DATE REPORT: 03/04/9i
SAMPLE I.O. STATION DETECTION
LIMIT
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
16897
16898
SPl-EW
SP2-SW
ND-None Detected
Reviewed by: wJtl
Kim Humphries f:..J1
A Subsidiary of American Te-!:ting and Enginec~ing Corporatio~
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Sine~ f958
5
5
CONC. RANGE
ND
ND
~ad.P~
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental. Geo·1echnical and
Ma:erials Engineers
~~·--=~~~~--~~----iiii liiiil
L.J L L.J L.J I_J I_J L.J L-l L-.J 'L L-.J L-1 L-i....... i....... L...J L...J _, L-
CHAIN OF CUSTODY' RECORD
'ROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME /1 11-l-L-i /3,:,. /i!:TO ~ LAB PROJ. NO./ I [) 1 () ,;,. ::, CLIENT /-J n/_L; e,...._ o Ttf,N s~-•--~-LABORATORY ANALYSIS ,{? ;AMPLERS: (Signature) 1/; ~
~'r
Vm.·. I-L1 c.,__J-f 0"' ~ ,fr} ~o ., \
AMPLING METHOD ~ ~ V .;;, 0-<!'
Ill (:,'<" o0 J...'r a;,' .d) ,._~ UJ u. a: 0~ ~ .,., .,__ 0"'<" c,, Fs A-o f-0 ow 0~ iii 0 a: ;a; t; ,._ :\ 0 0 w w .a: ,,, .f ~v ~ ~ V a: a: u: .. w <( ow ~ ,,, ,,, a. ID w w 0 C)f-_,c, "o ..., ~ ~ SAMPLE ::, <( f-...J f-0 ::,z a,::. 'r " V h J...'i' f::. 'l.v DATE TIME 0 a: ~ 6 ...J 0 w ::, 0 <(::, ov + ,._'r ~ ,,,,,,. ,._o ~/t<Q_ I 1.0. NO. u " Cl) u: <( ~ zu _,z -" ti," ,._o q .,
;p~ ;LBJ ,'1/,')(>j 'll f JY\ x )( x .J_ )( . ;< ,Pt ? Sw I--, l:x, t-, Pm X. J_ -r_ ;<. -~ ◄~' ' J.L~< I
1"4~ I ., •V~ 0 f-""'
..J,.} 4, ~:nm com n. <O IY en -· --1. _ _,,<
<O CD -• ::, ~
I -_f, ---"~o . ' ',jig. 0 O < "'· ., :, ::, •· V ":'lz!:'..o -• "'o"'-c,, ~ "'~n> 0 "'s: -· -i C !'1 ;; m
Tl~m°O _::, ►~ "' .... 3 ~g : 0 :, 0
"@"" n::,(D ..... I'\) ij' (0..., -.... :::, -0) (ti ....,w ya en ....
0,. -Q ~ "' :, ' o n ....,0 • -~"' • a,
'
.nqulshed by: ( Signature) Date I Time Received by: (Signoluro) Relinquished by: (Signature) Date I Time Received by: (Signature)
Y\ >. .J.. Ac I 0 ;;i/m/11 4.:.J:)p.,,.,
nquished b/. (Sigri,oure) Date/ Time R€~ fo;¼oratory by: 1~;';;;, Project Manager I Phone 11: (!f!!._n re)
~/)( 'JCl}IIJlj/0
( I
= !Tl 0
I
U7
I co
-'l = =
co
C\.)
u..)
I l
I l
I J
I J
•· J
I l
I J
ll .J
ATE€ Environmental T ~n~~T~J!~~~lnc.
1300 Willi.ams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
[404] 427-9456, FAX # [404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
RECEIVED DEC O 5 1991
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic lnves~igationS & Monitoring
Analytical Testing/ Cl)emistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental. Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#:
LAB PROJECT # :
35-07023_ Raleigh site Cleanup
3000
INVOICE PROJECT #: 08246 DATE SAMPLED: 11/06/91
MATRIX: Soil DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/14/91
METHOD: Modified 8015-5030 DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/19/91
Purge & Trap
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm) DATE REPORT: 11/20/91
SAMPLE I.D. STATION
27624 B-1
27625 B-2
27626 B-4
27627 B-7
27628 B-8
27629 B-9
27630 B-10
27631 B-11
27632 B-12
27633 B-13
27634 B-14
27635 B-15
ND-None Detected
Reviewed by:~~
Kirn Humphries
DETECTION
LIMIT
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
CONC. RANGE
77 Diesel
ND
ND
ND
ND.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CHE
CHEMISTRY
BORATORY MANAGER
DIVISION
Consl.Jlting Environmemaf. Geot~clmical ano
Materials Engineers
i___J L..J .___J .._J .___J L..J L.....J ' L.....J .._J l__J \ ____ j
CHAIN OF CI.Jv t'ODY RECORD
PROJ. NO.
35 -07oZ3
PROJECT NAME !2At.~/6ij 51.\.e, c l~/1,.,hJf' Closuru
CLIENT l~/\L.L.I P.,urz.1'0,-.) Se<W, ~ ·
LAB PROJ. NO./ / ~-
LABORATORY ANALYSIS ,;'
SA~ (Signature) (2
~✓-\/ ~ , . ()~b.3L
-SAMPLING METHOD ,. • U)
~'Sf>./SJ>i /55
SAMPLE DATE TIME I.D. NO.
w u. a: ... 0 0 ow
in UJ UJ a::!; . a:
0 a: a: u: W< ow
Q. a, UJ UJ B .,,_ . · ID
::. < ... .J ... 0 ::.z ;;;::.
0 a: < 6 .J i3 UJ :JO <:,
(..) (!) :t U) u: < sl Zt.l .JZ
MW-3 JI 1£)7 lf'S:5 "-,1 ' >< X X 4 X
B-\ 11/o(,,, 111°!1 ·X X 'X 'Z-
[3---2 11/o(R It:·'-~ )< X X 4-
B-4' U/o<,:, 2' VJ / 'nn ;x. X y 2--+'--'--"-....:.....,p.::..-F-+-+-'--t--t--+-+--t---fl---t--t---t--+--t---fl--t-'--'-r-t--t-c-t--t--t-~------i ;f! iS" t !:. ...
Is-7 II lot. 3·,J,::,
p' 5 I I /of,. 3.y;
)< X 'JC z ...
X
X SI, SZ '§ i? m 2 fl m
X cz) 53 ..,..s· 0 !!?. --
+---"---ll--<f-----t--+~t--t-"--t-+--t----l-'--+--+--+--+--t----l-+--+-t---+---t-;--t--...,~~-1 CD :J Q> 0 < , "' s :,
X S2, S.3 lilf ~ 2. :I =i'
(:, ,q
f3. /0
/3. I{
13 ... IZ.
B · 13
B-11
B .. ,-:,
·c..,_
II (oG,, f.·,~ • ->~
X y z..
X 'X )c .:::; +:--'-"'--"'-ii-::-:,=:::::.+--+,_.,_f-+'-=-+-+-+--f...C.+--+-=+--+--+---l-+:--+-1-+--+-+--+--'---1 tin a !l ccn O
*..<...::..~e-=---f!.l+--+<....:...f-+-'-'+-+-+--f.L......+--+....,,_+--+--+---f---l+x-'-+x:....:....1-x:....:..i-+--+-+-s....;1c...t{,"""'"11-"-"s""'s"-i ~ ~ ~ !!l _ ::s
--!J.!..!......:"'--11--'-..P-J-.-+.L......f-+-+-+-+--l-+--+.,:_+-+-+--1-+-x-+s,--,,1-+-+-+-+5-z_ ..... Jc..s_,_-1 ~ ! f d 3 II for, 4'~ )c 7-X z
ii /01 '1'~
11/07 1=1~
1//07 /o:I~
ll/01 .,o:<f<:
'f-. :x X 5
"f.. )C j: ~
)( ';C )( (p
i,.' >< )< .-z_
x )<.. IX ,1 .u..,,._ s.s is~ 3· ::s C1)
::::~~:=:::==::=:=::=:==:==:=:==:==::::===:==:=:==:x:::==:=::::==:==::s:z: 1:s:.3::=: ! ~ ~ cit ~ XIXX Sl#i.if.'.5p ~"' ~ Q
+:-'L..::...-'--jLL.::......C:.,'4--f."-,-f-+'-+-+--l---l-+--+....;c..-t--+--+---l-+-4"'-..!..jfL--"-f--+-+--+-----"-I -
X S/,SZ.
il/o, I'~ X X X '2-
Alok • '
'
' I ,
"' r 1
C I
1-:R::-e-::-lin-q-ui,-..,sh---,-iby-: -, S-lg-na...JtuL,a-J -+~D-:•t-e L:, T:-:-im...Je'--"1'::R:--ec.Le-:--iv-ed:-'.b:-y...J: ('::S:-ignJ.a-:-,u-,a.LJ --'--,:::R~el:;-in-q uLis-::h...Jed':-b:--yJ.: (::5:-ign.La-,u-,oL) _...J,--1;D;:--a-:-te.L/;,:T:;-im:-:e:---.:::R:-ec-e:-ive-=--d~b-y-: ,=s,:-gn-a-:-ru-,e-:-J -~r;
n c~
,/:;·~~, ,,~,~-~;.~!'.2'.:--:::~·-·A~~x __ il!._I ·'_!,l;'!Jj·'i'.£1~8~:o~,1.,,,..~~:::---:--:-:-----:--:-----:-----::---+---=--:--:--:::-----y-::---:--:-:-:-l__-:-:::::J_--:::-_L ___ ...:_ ____ ~'~
/rfifainquished by: (sfgnaruro) Dale/ Time Received for Laboratory by: Date/ Time Project M~nager I Phone#:
~,~,:~/ ~ ii/~ vi1.,., G,'!11'A-AA~ 5,,,;,=-t1>1t.,0 ('11"1) 7B 2-2-8':)2-~
• L_ _____ j___L___t~~~~====-=-t....:.._~ _ __i_ _______ ~ ___ ___J
J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I
ATE€ Environmental "7 ~n~?T~clt~~~lnc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta. Georgia 30066-6299
[404] 427•9456, FAX# (404] 427·1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
CLIENT PROJECT i: 35-07023
LAB PROJECT#: 3000
INVOICE PROJECT #: 08246
MATRIX: Soil
METHOD: Modified 8015-3550
Extraction
UNITS: mg/kg (ppm)
RECEIVED DEC O 5 1991
Solid & Hazardous Waste Sile Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
HyOrogeologic lnvesligation; & Monitoring
Analytical Testing I Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
Raleigh Site Cleanup
DATE SAMPLED: 11/06/91
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/14/91
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/19/91
DATE REPORT: 11/25/91
SAMPLE I.D. STATION DETECTION PARAMETER
27624 B-1
27625 B-2
27626 B-4
27627 B-7
27628 B-8
27629 B-9
27630 B-10
27631 B-11
27632 B-12
27633 B-13
27634 B-14
27635 B-15
ND-None Detected
Reviewed by: KH
Kim Humphries
LIMIT
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering CorporatiO:'!
Offices in Major U.S. Cities!Since 195B
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
CONC. RANGE
113
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dies.el
N
LABORATORY MANAGER
DIVISION
Cons_uiting Environmental. Geoter.tmica! an(
Materials Engineers
I -
I 1
-
I J
I J
I .,
I J
m J
I J
I J
D J
u J
I J
I J
I J
ATE¢ Environmental
~ ~n~~T~c
1
!~~~1nc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
[404) 427-9456. FAX# [404) 427-1907
RECEiVEO DEC O 5 18~1
Solid & Hazardous Waste Si!e Assessments
Remedial Design&. Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrog,ologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing /Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
CLIENT PROJECT #: 35-07023 Raleigh Site Cleanup
LAB PROJECT # : 3000 DATE SAMPLED: 11/06/91
INVOICE PROJECT #: 08246 DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/14/91
MATRIX: Leachate DATE SAMPLE EXTRACTED: 11/26/91
UNITS: ug/L (ppb) DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/27/91
DATE REPORT: 12/01/91
METHOD: TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE(TCLP)~l311
PARAMETER
TCLP VOLATILES
METHOD
Benzene 602
carbon tetrachloride 6_01
·Chlorobenzene 601
Chloroform 601
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 601
1,2-Dichloroethane 601
1,1-Dichloroethylene 601
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 602
Tetrachloroethylene 601
Trichloroethylene 601
Vinyl chloride 601
ND-None Detected
. K'H
.Reviewed by:
Kim Humphries
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
DETECTION
LIMIT
5
5
5
,5
.5
5
5
10
5
5
10
SAMPLE I.D.
LAB: 27624
STATION: B-1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
27629
9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CHE BORATORY MANAGER
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental, Geotechnical a:1d
Materials Engineers
I J
I
I )
I J
I J ·1 J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I 1
, I J
I 1
I J
I J
ATE€ Environmental
" ~n~~T~}!~~~lnc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
[404] 427-9456, FAX# [404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
RECEIVED l'JEe O 5 198
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank ,Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis.
Hydr0geotogic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytica! Testing /Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 3~-07023 Raleigh Site Cleanup
LAB PROJECT # : 3000
INVOICE PROJECT#: 08246
MATRIX: Leachate
UNITS: ug/L (ppb)
DATE SAMPLED: 11/06/91
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE EXTRACTED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 12/01/91
11/14/91
11/26/91
11/27/91
METHOD: TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE(TCLP)-1311
PARAMETER
TCLP VOLATILES
METHOD
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
ND-None Detected
. H
Reviewed by: K
Kim Humphries
602
601
601
601
601
601
601
602
601
601
601
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineer1~g Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/ Since 1958
DETECTION
LIMIT
5.
5
5
5
.5
5
5
10
5
5
10
SAMPLE I.D.
LAB; 27631
STATION: 11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
N
27633
13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CHE
CHEMISTRY
LABORATORY MANAGER
DIVISION
Conswting Environmental. Geote:r.nical ar.c·
Ma1e;ia/s Engineers
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
0 J
u .i
• J
IJ
I J
I J
I J
I J
IJ
I J
I J
ATE€ Environmental ? ~n~?r~cl!~~~lnc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
(404] 427-9456, FAX# (404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
RECEl\'EQ DEC O 5 199
Solid & Hazardous Waste Sile Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic lnves:ii;ations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing /Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits.& Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-07023 Raleigh Site Cleanup
LAB PROJECT # : 3000
INVOICE PROJECT#: 08246
MATRIX: Leachate
UNITS: mg/L (ppm)
DATE SAMPLED: 11/06/91
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 12/01/91
·11/14/91
11/27/91
METHOD: TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE(TCLP)-1311
PARAMETER
BASE NEUTRALS &
ACID EXTRACTIBLES
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pyridine
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
o-Cresol
m,p-Cresol
Total Cresol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND-None Detected
Reviewed by:~~
Kim Humphries
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
DETECTION SAMPLE I.D.
LIMIT LAB: 27624 27629
STATION: B-1 9
0.10
0.50
1.0
1.0
1:. 0
0.10
1.0
2.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
CHE
CHEMISTRY
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
N
LABORATORY
DIVISION
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MANAGER
Consulting Environme .... :E . Geotech:1ical and
Materials=-; neers
I_J
11
I __ l
I_J
I J
I_J
I J
u J
I J
I
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I ]
II J
ATEe Environmental 'W ~n'!~T't1!~~~1nc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
Marietta. Georgia 30066-6299
[404] 427-9456, FAX# [404[ 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
CLIENT PROJECT # : 35-07023
LAB PROJECT # : 3000
INVOICE PROJECT #: 08246
MATRIX: Leachate
UNITS: mg/L (ppm)
RECE\VED DEC O 5 1991
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
' Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surv&ys & Analysis
Hydro_geologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing/ Cllemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Ha_zard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permilling
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
Raleigh site Cleanup
DATE SAMPLED: 11/06/91
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/14/91
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/27/91
DATE REPORT: 12/01/91
METHOD: TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE(TCLP)-1311
PARAMETER
BASE NEUTRALS &
ACID EXTRACTIBLES
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pyridine
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
o-Cresol
m,p-Cresol
Total Cresol
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND-None Detected
Reviewed by: J(tt
Kim Humphries
A SutJsidiary of American Testing ano Engineering Corporatio11
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/Since. 1958
DETECTION
LIMIT
0.10
0.50
1.0
1.0
1.0
o•.10
1.0
2.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
SAMPLE I.D.
LAB:
STATION:
N
27633
13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND.
ND
ND
C
CHEMISTRY
LABORATORY MANAGER
DIVISION
Consulting Environmental, Georechnico! and
Materials Engineers
11 DEC-19-81 lttU 11 :,:4 r. JO
I l ATEe Environmental
I ] ... ~n~~~l~~~lnc.
I J
1300 Williams Drive. Suite A
Marietta. Georgia 30066-6299
(404J 427-9458. FAX 11 (404] 4~7-1907
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessmenls
Remedlal Opslgn & Conslruclion
Underground Tank Management
· Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic ln,,.11s11ya11ons & Mon11or,,,g
Analytical Testing/Chemistry
I ] CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard.Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
u]
• J
I
IJ
I J
I J --
1 J
I J
I J
I ~
0 J
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
CLIENT PROJECT i: 35-07023 Raleigh Site Cleanup
LAB PROJECT i: 3000
INVOICE PROJECT#: 08246
MATRIX: Leachate
UNITS: mg/L (ppm)
DATE SAMPLED: 11/06/91
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/14/91
DATE SAMPLE EXTRACTED: 11/22/91
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 11/25/91
DATE REPORT: 12/05/91
METHOD: TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE(TCLP)-1311
PARAMETER METHOD DETECTION
'l'CLP METALS LIMIT
Arsenic 206.2 0.05
Barium 208.l 1.00
Cadmium 213.1 0.02
Chromium 218.1 0.05
Lead 239.1 0.05
Mercury 245.2 0.002
Selenium 270.2 0.02
Silver 272.1 0.02
ND-None Detected
Reviewed by: /<. )t
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Ciries!Since 1958
SAMPLE I,D,
LAB: 27631
STATION: B-11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0
, __
Re
LABORABORY DIVISION
Consulting £nvironmenlal. Geo!echnical and
Maferiafs Engineers
/ .
iiii --ii I I --I -I!!!!! iilii liiii -.. - -
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME i2Au:'i511 s14 cl<Mup closuru: LAB PAOJ. NO./ I 3S -07DZ3 LABORATORY ANALYSIS CLIENT l~/\L,L,I P.,t.JIZl'ON $«(l,\)la,_.s ;, .
SA~ (Signature) O~b.3c-l_ ~ ~ r ~ (/, -,9 ~? ' 9 ,:J. ' I ~
.// ,/ . . '1.f Y, :~ ' -i!-'
'SAMPLING METHOO , . ho\ ~o v;il -3-ll ,::-o
1/)
.s,,? i' '-Y 3-/4.u"' ,fl"; cf.,. w u. a:
(lsl)../Sf>T /55 .... 0 ow in 0 w w a: ;, . a:
,d' ,d' .;' c:81/;I/; ,t' f !iv
0 a: a: ii: W<( ciW .. ID w w i5 ID I---' a,
SAMPLE :,; < .... ...I .... 0 :l;Z ID :l; DATE TIME 0 a: < 5 ...I [i w :JO <(:J <3"" <3j <3"" 1/ I I <3"" ~,; "'/ 1.0. NO. 0 (!) ;: 1/) ii: < ~ zo ...!Z
MW-3 JI /()7 1('$:5 . >< X X 4 X X )< MW-3 ◄i ~-r1
B-\ Jl/o(,., 111".e, X X 'X 2--X 51.SZ
13-2 11/o(,;, /t-~f )< X :x 4-X X )( s1, sz., -s~.sf
B-4-U/o& /Z.:o~ X X y 2--X S//SZ. -,,'" "Om ~ Q) (D -·
3·, J::':, (0 -_. < B· 7 11 /o~ X X '52,S3 -"' .. -· ::, y: ·-z-X "'.ff O ~-0 CD?°OJ ·o <.
p -8 3 .·35 X "' < :,
11/o& X X z_ X 52, S.3 f\l~v;· o J -• ·c,.,.. Ol::10 -...
/1/o(p +:'.;' ... X '>< Jd:,---► en 0 f:, -") .. :x "'i X X X S I -H,va.. S '5 . oil. '"'c j!~CD m :,
(3 -to 11 /oc:,, 4'~ )c 7-. X 2-)< XQ. (')-
5 z.J 5 3 "s· l:-+ 3 ~ "0 (3 . I I ii /07 '1'~ y.. )C X 5 ',,( X X °iDN O
:,/ -14,m. S-.S -..., 0 :;~ ~::I (t)·
B -tz. 11/07 1:45 j. )C y: z_ X 52.,S.3 O> "' .. cit ::I ,-::::g ~
B -13 1//07 /(): 1%,._ 'j:.. ";C. X (p X X X SI +ha<'. Sf, VIN ::, .....
"' 0 0 O> •
B · Ii 1l/01 to:<f?. I--" )< )c '2-X -5/,SZ.
B ··rs ///07 I'~ )( X X z_ lX S S, SC,
Alok , -1 £, AS ~ t"'Dr> ''fl;): :t-h " ~ ,::,i \ l., 7 Y."JP cz5 v Uo 0 , -·15, :i .., . . ~ S' IL ''✓-, ' 11 I /)T) -rro /f'yf --s , ~ c::: IH✓J-e •rt,.', C,,./ "-'-Av-, ll.kl te.. •A,, o(,, C\ ' ~-5 ~ I
I 7'110 r ,. " -A,, ~ <, ' ' -r 1 I I ' [] Reli/'"7 by: (Signature} Dale I Time Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) Dale I Time · Received by: (SignalurnJ r,
,,:?, . • 2 ('
,. . l!-13·'1 J 8'0~ '::, ,.,,,.....-i.r/r -.,. ,
Date I Time Received for Laboratory by: Dale I Time .n '!j,e inquished by: /S1gnalure) Projecl M~nager / Phone #:
~;.;;/-~ v~ vii"° G; ,u,,-1-\A ~ S"1,.;,""'Y1.,~w (q 14) 7 8 z.-2-8::,2-~
APPENDIX C
MONITORING WELL DOCUMENTS
WELL PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION RECORDS
ABANDONMENT RECORDS
I
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James G .. Martin, Governor William W. Cpbey, Jr .• Secretaiy
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 16, 1990
Halliburton Services
Duncan
Oklaho~a 73536-0100
Dear Sirs:
Subject: Well Construction Permit
No. 91-0905-WM-0433
Wake County
In accordance with your application received 13 November 1990, we
are forwarding herewith Well Construction Permit No. 91-0905-WM-0433
dated 16 November 1990, issued to Halliburton Services for the
construction of ( 1) one or more monitor wells.
This Permit will be effective from the date of its issuance and shall
be subject to the conditions and lirntations as specified therein.
AM:STA:cs
Sincerely,
~ ~~~_?
Arthur Mouberry, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Regional Office
cc: Groundwater Files
Wake County Health Department
Waheed Rana-Atec
Bob Cheek
Enclosure,
3800 llarrett Drtvc. Suite 101 • Raleigh. N.C. 2 7609
T*phone [phone] • FAX Number [phone]
An FrnW Ormortunftv Affimiatfvc Action Emoloyer
I J
I J
• J
I J
0 J
I J
I J
I ...J
I 7
I
I
0 -
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WELL.
In accordance with the
Carolina General Statutes,
prov1s10ns of Article 7, Chapter 87, North
and other applicable Laws, Rules and
Regulations ..
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Halliburton Services
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MONITOR WELL SYSTEM located
at 3219 Northside Drive, Raleigh, in the saprolite of north central Wake
County, in. accordance with the application dated 12 November, 1990,
and in conformity with specifications and supporting data, all of which
are filed . with the Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources and are considered a part of this permit.
This Permit is for
waive any provision or
law or regulation.
well construction
requirement of
only,
any
and
other
does not
applicable
Construction of a well under this Permit shall be
in compliance with the North Carolina Well Construction
Regulations and Standards (15A NCAC 2C . 0108),
laws and regulations pertaining to monitoring well
other State and Local
construction .
This permit will be effective from the date of its
issuance until l November, 1991 or as this date shall be amended and
shall be subject to other specified conditions, limitations, or exceptions
as follows:
1. Furnish copies
Environmental
of chemical
Management,
Section, · P.O. Groundwater
27611-7687.
analyses to the Division of
Raleigh Regional Office,
Box 27687, Raleigh,· N. C.
2. Notify the Raleigh Regional Office Groundwater Section at·
733-2314 upon completion to allow a well construction
inspection.
Permit issued this the 16th day of November, 1990.
FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CO!vThUSSION
~ ?71;,,, (~
Arthur Mouberry,P.E., Regional Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit No. 91-0905-WM-0433
HORTH CAROLHIA R£. c·. ·
ENY!RONKEHTAL KAHAGEKEHT COMH!SS!ON '.J::'/1 'C::-
DEPAP.TMcNT oF t{ATURAL RESOURCES AND coi,-,'IUH !TY DEYELOPHar-1 V t.::.O
________ APPL! CAT I ON FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT MON I TOR/RE6'l»f~~~~~------
--------··---·
To: tW~ TH CAROLI HA EH VI ROHME HT AL MAHAG EMEHT COMM l S S l ot'G¾usmm-L b2 , 19 J__Q_ __
•-. f'FrCE
Gentlemen:
In accordance with the provisions of Artic1e
Horth Carolina, and regulations.pursu•nt thereto,
7, Chapter 87,
application is
for a
General Statutues of
hereby made by ·
permit to cons t"n:icCa-
Halliburton Services
-7name of well owner)
monltor/recovery well (s) as described below and in the accompanying data sutm1tted as a
part of this application.
(a) Harne of property owner: _H_a_l_l_ib----;u_r_t_o_n_S_e_r_v_i_c_es _________ _
. (b) Location of pToperty: 3219 Northside Drive, Ralei h, Wake Count
Roa , In ustry, CoITT11un1ty, etc. Town
(c) Type of facility or site being monitored: Industrial Cleaning
. . ----------
(d) Types of contamination being monitored or recov·ered: __ N_o_n_e ___ _
( e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
( 1 )
( j)
Existing monitor wel1 numbers: ____ . _No_n_·e------~-------
Exist1ng monitor we1ls showing c~ntamination (wen no.): None -...-="'---,--
Estimated water-tab1e depth:. 6.0 feet
Estimated date of construction: Begin ·November 13, 1990 Complete November 13, 1990
Drilling cons tractor: ATEC Associates Incorporated _______ _
Location of well: Provide a detai1ed map showing the 1ocation of th_e proposed well(s),
and of any wells in an existing ~onitoring system (If applicable), in relation to the
pollution source(s) being monitored a'nd to at least two (2) nearby permanent reference
points such as roads, ·1ntersections,_.and streams .. Identify roads wHh 'State Highway
road Identification numbers. (show a11 existing water·supply wel1s within a radius of
l, 000 feet of the proposed well.) ·
(k) \./ell constructfon diagram: Provide a diagram showing proposed construction spec1ficat
Including diame~er, estimated depth, screens, sand pack, grout, type· of materials, _etc
The App11cant hereby agrees the proposed
well wi1l be constructed in accotdance with
approved specifications and conditions of
the 1-/el l Construction Permit. As regulated
under the Well Construction Standards (Title
15 -Horth Carolina Admlnistrati~e Code,
Subchapter 2C)
Gli-220
Halliburton Services, Dun.s:an 10klahc
(Mai1ing Address of \-/ell Owner-Req
73536-0l
ATEC Associates, 6814 Da~is_CJrcle,Ea'
(Mai1ing Address of Aoent-if other
than above) -. \/ r_,,
FOR OFF I CE ~?E OHL Y
q ( tx? ~5-(A),.,._ . //_ JI.'()
PERMIT HO. Of"il Issued .LfPIV' V
I-
.J
IJ
I]
I]
I ]
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
ATE€ Environmental w S,e~A~E~},!o~I~!~
C-.H :~ Oa·,i!. C;rcle WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM
R;;,'rdg:i, N0r1i" Carolina 2rn12·2002
PROJECT: _ _!!Al.LIBURTON SERVICES . JOB NUMBER: _3,_s~-~□ ... 1~□~2_..3 ___ ~--
LOCATION :_J2 l~ Nortbside Drl1te, Ra 1eigh North C:iroliC>a 27!il:l WELL NUMOER: ~Ml,='-_._-,---_,...,,.-,-,,-,,-,,-----ELEVATION: _____________________ _
DATE /NSTALLEDNovember 13, 1990 □GROUND □CASING □PROTECTOR CASING
Sl'CURITY
~ -] TOTAL ~: 5 D E P TH
• (FT)
COMMENTS:
WELL CASING
DIAMETER (IN)
2
FILTER
PACK
TYPE
I
........... . . .
FI LT ER .--1,-2~..,
PACK ~'-'i--~
LENGTH
(FT)
0 ABOVE GROUND LEVEL O ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
GROUT TYPE
A;. .... ~----
HOLE I DIAMETER
~-~ (IN)
SLOT
OPENING
(IN)
.--,-'-~ OPEN OR I 10 I SLOTTED
LEtlGTH
(FT)
r-t-]L6
E1:tT~i
GROUT TYPE
GROUND
SURFACE
[
. -] TOTAL 1_0____ CASING
LENGTH
(FT)
~T)
-------
---------------------···-
------------------··--
--------·-------------------
-----------------------PAGE ___ OF
HCL AST's
FORMER Sl':°i OF.---
DIESEL Fill':L AST _
• t
~SOIL
PROPOSED MONITOR WELL
LOCATION
I
EMPTY I
I
I
I
I
I
' "' I z
1-1
' ....,
' ,.,
£,-< "' "' HALLIBURTON "" 0
SERVICES "' "" •
SOR1il CAROLINA DEPAR1ME."ff OF llEALTII. ENvmo:-:'.'-lE'\"T, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEKT. GROUNDWATER S&..-i!ON
FOR Ol'l'ICE USE ONLY
P.O. BOX T76S7 • RALEIGH, NC 27611, PHO~C. (919) 7~3-5083
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DR!U.ING CONTRACTOR A TEC Associates Inc.
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER 696
Quid No.----~-Scriil ~o. ---~---UL-~----Lo,~ ______ P, MinorBuin _______________ _
Bain Code----------===----Header Ent GW•l Ent __ _
STATE WELL CONSTilUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER: 91-0905-ViM-0433
IJ
I :J --------------------------------1 .] 1.
I .J 2.
I :J
I :J ::
5.
I .. J 7.
G .
I 8.
.J 9.
I J 10.
From
From
From
11.
rrom
From
12.
rrom
From
From
13.
WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the loc.i.1ion below)
Nearest Town: _ __eR,e,1,-<ie;h,,__ ___________________ _
3219 Norlh~ide Dri\·e
(Ro:,.d, Community, or Subdivision ind Lot No.)
OWNER
ADDRESS
Hal\ibur1on Industrial Services
Drawer 1431
Dunc:.n
City or Town
73536
Stile ZIP Code
Date Drilled __ ,_,11'-'m"'n-"o'----USE OF WELL ~m~o~"~it~o~n~,, ___ _
Tomi Depth 2.s.o FL Cuttings Collecced? _x_ y,. __ No
DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? y., _x_ No
Static Water Level: -~S-~0-fL __ ibove _X_ ~low top of casing.
Top of casing is 0.5 ft above !:ind surface.
YIELD (gpm), KA MEIBOD OF TEST NA
Water Zones (dep1h): NA
CHLORINATION: Type _,NccAc,... ___ _ Amount _ _.N"-A,_ _____ _
CASING:
Depth
• .5 To .5 _....:,_ ___ FL
To _____ FL
To _____ FL
GROUT:
Depth
0.0 To .~o FL
To FL
SCREEN:
Depth
.s.o To -25.0 FL
To FL
To FL
GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
Diimeter
2
Miteri:.l
Will Thickness
or Weig.ht/Ft
Sch 40
Neal ~ment
Oiime1er Slot Size
2 in. .010 in. , .. in. ---, .. in.
Size
Ma1erfal
PVC
Methnd
HAND
Material
PVC
MiteriJ!
From
Depth
To
Drilling Log
Form:.tion Description
SEE BOI\ING LOGS
If addition:,.( sp:i.ce is needed. use b;ick o{ form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show.direction ind distance from it le:ast two St:.te Ro:i.ds.. o
other m:1.p reference points.)
See Attached Monitor Well I...ocation Mip
MW•l I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I -J
f-11.:iu, -3.0 To -25.0 FL Fine•Medium SAND
From
14.
I J
To FL
REMARKS:
I !JO HEREBY CERTIFY IBAT TI-IIS WEU WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 14 NCAC 2C, WELL
CONs·mucnON RECORDS, AND 11-lAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS REEN PROVIDFD TO IBE WELL OWNER.
Sii;nuure of Contractor or A:cn1 D,
Submit origiHI to Division oC Environmenbl Mnigemcnl .~ copy to well
1-J
I
J
BJ
DJ
I J
I J
I J
I J
I 1
I -I
ATEC Environmental Consultants
W Division of ATEC Associates, Inc.
6814 Davis Circle
Raleigh, North Carolina 27613
[phone] Raleigh
[phone] FAX
0 35-07023 JOB N .: __ ....::..=-=='-----
DATE: _;:.;11°"/....:2:..::0:.c/-"-9:::..0 _____ _
DEPTH -Ff.
FROM TO SOIL DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS
4.5 5.0 Moist, brown siltv clav, detritus
9.5 10.0 Very-wet, dark grey micaceous silty Sand
14.5 15.0 Very wet, dark grey micaceous silty Sand
19.5 20.0 Moist, brown micaceous silty Sand
24.5 25.0 Moist, brown micaceous silty Sand
.
I
HAND AUGER BORING LOG
NUMBER: --'-'M.::.11_-,,_1 ____________ _
LOCATION: _______________ _
DEPTH PIO
Ff. READING REMARKS
5 1.0 oom
10 30 oom Verv strom1 Diesel odor
15 30 ppm Very strong Diesel odor
20 30 ppm
25 40 ppm
I 7 Depth Referenced To: -----------------------------------
~
N
0 LIGHT POLE
PROPERTY LINE
·~
MW-1
MONITORING WELL LOCATION MAP
HALLIBURTON FACILITY
3219 NORTHSIDE DRIVE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
CONCRETE PAD AND
FORMER LOCATION OF
ABOVE GROUND TANKS
SCALE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE:
RELATIVE JSJ 11-21-90
BACKFILL AREA
CONCRETE PAD
ATEC Environmental Consultants
V , Dlvlalon of ATEC AuocllltH, Inc:.
6814 Davis Circle
Raleigh, North Carolina 27613
[phone] Ratetgh
(919) 781-755B FAX
PROJECT NQ. 35-07023 FlCURE NO.
I J
NORTH
l..
!
I
·ti_;_
:,• '\
~:ii::-.:;
{lj} ·,·, \ -,:·
Jv.:· ·~•-~]
f!//' ...
,~:~~;~.'~:::::\ (':t:;~~:;.:••!:. l
~~;c•· •
•
·,.
\, ..
. G\ r:'"\!
·•"---'!:·---
. .,
\ /·;
-'--". • I
, ......... -,_. . , I• .
"" .
\ .
> ,, '" .;:: ~ o/ :,.ef-
\\ ~,~\ -..-~?.-;:"'-;_.1'.:.~~.=..::=""'-"-"'V
: t
.... ~r:-:':"!.:' •.
·•:·•~1 " (
...........
7
I J-\ORTH CAROLINA Dl3PARTMENT Of HEALTH. ENVIRONMENT. AND NATIJRAL RESOURCES
DIVISION Of ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ON!.. Y
P.O. BOX 27687 • RALEIGH, NC 27611, PHONE [phone]S3
WELL CONSTRUCl10N RECORD 1-
.lll.LING CONTRACTOR ....r:A,_,TE=C~Ass=o,,,c,eia"-'tec,s~. I"n'=-c·~--------1 JUllER REGISTRATION NUMBER __;6"'9"'6 ________ _
I
I
g
WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
'.\:c:arest Town: _,R.,,oe,ke.i!:s,h,_ ___________________ _
l:!19 Nonhsidl' Drive
1Road. Community. or Subdivision :ind Lot No.)
OWNER Halliburton Industrial Services
ADDRESS -'""''"""'"S!'...!lc:•s.31,_ __________________ _
Oklahoma 73536
City ur Town S1att' ZIP Code
Date Drilled _.,_1:>J=-.elY.l""-'l-----USE OF WELL __,m,,o,,,,"i10,,,ne,·•,,g..__ ___ _
Totnl Depth ~5.0 Cuttings Collected? _x_ y.,, __ No
DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? y"" _x_ No
Srntic Water Level: ___ r1. __ above __ below 1op or casing.
Top o[ c:i.sing is ____QL Cl. :i.bove bnd surface.
YIELD lal'ml• NA METHOD OF TEST _2:Ns,Ac_ __ _
Water Z.unes (depth): --"'N'-'A~-------------------
CHLORINATION: Typ, _ _,,N"'A~---Amoun1 ---"Ne;A,_ ____ _
)
IV. C,\SING:
],,, Depth
u To
h<>m To
~l'" To
_ <;ROUT:
Depth
]"' O.tl To
• m T,1
Jo ---""~-FL
_____ FL
_____ Fl.
27 ---='---F1.
_____ F1.
W;11J Thicl.nt:SS
or Wcigh1/F1.
Material
Neal Cement
Sch 40
M:i.terial
Method
Hand
PVC
I 71 SCREEN:l,pih
IL ln ~ll To --''";'--r1. --~'-in. __JlliL_ in.
Material
PVC
II 11·"'1',',', T" ----Fl. II ____ Tu ____ Fl.
,. I GRAVEL PACK:
___ in.
___ in.
___ in.
___ in.
II Depth
(I ]•11 -~:,<Jc,_ __ To _ _;4,;5c,.O,__ FL
l , .. 111 _____ Tu _____ Fl.
Size
Fine-Medium
D I•. REMARKS: l
Material
SAND
Quad No. ______ Seri:11 No. ______ _
LoL ______ Long. ______ Pc __ _
Minor Basin
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER: 91-0905-WM-0433
County: _we.'"'"''-----------------
Depth Drilling Log
From To Formation Dl'!>Cripcion
If :i.ddition:i.l sp:i.ce is needed, use h:i.cl of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction .and disunce from :11 le:i.sl two Sl.:lle Ro.:ids. or
other m:1p reference points.)
See Au:i.ched Monitoring Well Loc:11ion M:1p
MW-2
~-
I
I DO HEREl!Y CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WJTH 14 NCAC 2C, WELL
CONSTllUCl"ION RECOIWS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
:1' ~. !
D JI
Signature of Co~1rac1or or Agent Dare
Submit original to Division of Environmental M.1n:igc.-mcn1 & rnpy tu wdl owner.
'J~-ENv.muso.wcR-u~
-I
. .-.. -..
--------GRESHAM-""· .,r-DoAD -------====-----------· ,----------
FORNER LOCATION
OF ABOVE GROUND
STORAGE TANKS
a
MW-3
13 ~SOIL
0
0
>-,--
I
EMPTY I HALLIBURTON I SERVICES
I
I
I
I ; I OFFCES I
FENCE I
I
!
I
I
NORTHSIDE DRIVE
\JELL
HOUSE 0
-
"' :z: H ..,
SITE DIAGRAM .
HALLIBURTON SERVICES
RALEIGH, NORIH.CAROLINA
ATEC Environmental Consultants
LOCATION OF·ABANDONED MONITOR WELL, MW-2
S:CAl.E: DP..A\.l/i B\'.: CMECK.EO BY: DAI'E:
1:50 JSJ WC 10/31/90
WT . Dlvl,_lon al ATEC AL1oclalu, Inc. \..T~ 681.( Davis Circle
Ralaloh, Nonh Carolina 2761:J ·
{919: 782·2832 Aa.ltl.]:,i
(919) 7B1•755B FAX .
PP.OJ£CT HO.
35-08480
flGURE. HO.
1
I
~
I ~ORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTII, ENVIRONMENT. AND NATURAL RESOURCES I-'' DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX ,76S7 • RALEIGH, NC 27611, PHONE [phone]
I.J WELL CONSTRUCTTON RECORD
IJ DRILLING CONTilACTOR ~A=TE=C~Ass=o=c=ia=te~•~· =ln=c~. ________ _
ju-LER REGISTRATION NUMBER -~69~6'----------1, WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the locauon below)
Total Depth 45.0 Cuttings Collected? _x_ y., __ No
DOES WELL REPLACE EXJSTING WELL? Yes _x_ No
I
l To11 of casing is ___QL ft. above land surface.
YIELD tgp,q: NA METHOD OF TEST -~NA~---
w'mer Zones (depth): NA
J l10. CJ ILOlllNATION: Type _ _,N"A.,__ ____ Amoun1 ---"Nc,A~-----
CASING:
Diame1er
Wall Thickm:s.s
or Wcighl/FL J Oeplh I : .. ru,:1
1 --~"--~:-~
30
~--;:-
Sch 40
·J·" ---:--To _____ Ft II GROUT:
II Depth
J"-~0:0 __ ·1~-~'~7 ___ F1. 0 112." _s_c_R_E-,c-.N-, _,..,-----Ft
Material
Ne-at Ct'men1
l)l'plh
30 To 45
To
To
Ft.
Ft.
Ft
lJiam .. •tL·r Slot Size·
--~~ _ in. ___filQ_ in.
---~in.
____ in.
___ in.
___ in.
GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
:?<J To
To
REMARKS:
45.0 -~=--FL _____ Ft
Size
Fine-Medium
M:Hcri:al
PVC
Mc1hod
Hollow S1em Aug"r
PVC
Ma1crial
SAND
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad No. _____ _ Serial No. ______ _
Llt -----~ Long. ______ P, __ _
MinorB,isin
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER: 91-0905-WM-0433
County: Wake
Depth Drilling Log
From To Fonnation Description
If addi1ional space is needed, use back of Conn.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction :ind dist:1nce from :it least two St:llc Ro.1ds, or other map reference poinu.)
See An.,ched Monitoring Well Loc.11ion Map
MW.3
I DO HEREBY CER'llFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 14 NCAC 2C, WELL C:ONSTllUCl'ION !(EC:ORDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
Sign:iturc of Contractor or Agcnl Dale
I . j
I 1, l
GRESHAM . -,r DoAD
FORNER LOCATION
OF ABOVE GROUND
STORAGE TANKS
6
0
0
~SOIL
8
8
MW-3
>--
-
I
EMPTY I HALLIBURTON
SITE DIAGRAM
HALLIBURTON SERVICES
RALEIGH, NOR~H CAROLINA
FENCE
I SERVICES
I
I
I
I ' I OFF:ICES I I .
I
I
!
I
I
NORTHS DE DRIVE
\/ELL
HOUSE
LOCATION OF· ABANDONED MONITOR WELL, MW-2
~CALE:
l: 50 I
DR.AWN BY:
JSJ I CH.ECK.ED 8 Y :
WC I
DATE:
10/31/90
<al :z: H
,-J
ATEC Environmental Consultants
W . Olvls_lon of ATEC A11,.1ocla1u, Inc. \. T,, 68 J.t Davis Circle
Ralaloh, Nonh Carolini 27613
(919) 782-283:l AaJt\.]1'1
(919) 781°7558 FAX .
I
·~J
I l
..,_,,_ .. -· ·-·><-..,._ .. ._.._ ...,., '"'., .. ._..,...,.._.,.,._C:lJ til\U 1....,,.J[fl:r.\.!ri.!..(_)' Ut;:'/t;1()~::;1.:;-1(.
wr--'--'-A.BA.NJX)NMENI'
RECORD
Divtslon of Environmen(al Management
P. 0. Box Z?6S7 -Raleigh, H. C. 2'7611 '
1,-QNTRACTOR ATEC Associates, Inc. REG. UO
1 .. \.TELL LOCATION: (Show a aketch of the location on b~ck of form.)
Wake
696
Nearest Town: Raleigh County -----'---'--------,------------~-------
n J
g ]I
D ~
R 1 . '
----r:=--------,------:---:---:-=-'----r--~Quad.rangle No -Wake Forest . (Road, Corm.m:i.ty, Subd.iviaion,·1.ot No.)
OWNER· . H~lliburton Services
ADDRESS~ 3219 Northside Drive ... WELL DIAGRAH: Draw a dettiled sketch.of
~OPOGRAPHY:draw,slope,hilltop,valley .. flat· well showing total dept.)}, depth end dian
of screens remaining in the well, gravel USE OF WELl.,: Monitor DATE: interval, intervals of c2sing perforatic
~QTAL DEPTH: 25' DIA. hfETER : 2" and depths and types of fill materials u
' CASil!G REM'.JVED: '
N/A
Eeet diameter
25 2"
.
SEALING MA'.l;'ERIAL:
Neat cement Sand cement -..-
~s of cement_o_ bags of cement 0 --
,;ala. of water 0 yds. of sand 0 ----
gals. of water 0 --
Other
'i'-.fPe material N/A
J...rrcunt NIA ..
E::X:PI.J..lli MEI'HOD OF EMPLACDIENT OF MATERIAL
lle.11 was !iEemoved during excavati6n
of surrounding soil contamination
I do hereby certify that this well
e.baru:lonment record is true and exact.
::iigTlflture cl' -Ccmtrnc tor or Agent Dote . ' ,
I j....i~~:. o-:-t5inol to the nt·✓io1on of Envlronmcnc.ol ~.ano.gcmc.1.:, .one. co;:,y co ~he' Drtl lcr, ,:--id c-:ie coRY r.o che Ovne.r.
I
1J!
I Ji
1J
1J
1J
I
I J
I J
I J
I l
I J
I, n
I J
J I
H J
D TI
D Il
·''-'SHOPPING CENTER ---
... : ,. :i{\S~{\ti~ff,.:~}}~i;~t0i~{{J/_;_· .. . • ;:• •• .-' -~;: .• :;.;.1:,. ,:;,;;,;:-;; ·:!S:."','.f✓-,r.;fSf-;ip.;:\ ..
... .. . .. --•·•·. . . . ~
: _'·:,i·'.T'+·i•' : '!~~~~ • \
;---':_:_ ;•, i
GRESHAM •· · :'~ COAD
FOR.HER LOCATION
OF ABOVE GROUND
STORAGE TANKS
8
MW-3
------
6 ~SOIL
0 e 0 -
~
~ni-1~
. . LOCATION OF ABANDONED MONITOR WELL
MW-2
EMPTY I HALLIBURTON
FENCE
I
I
I
I
I
SERVICES
:
I I OF!'J:CES I
I
NORTHS DE DRIVE
\./ELL
HOUSE CJ
ATEC Environmental Consultants
WT, . Division ol ATEC Auocl1l11, Inc._ \,. T .,I 68 U Oavls Circle
Aaleloh, North C.uolinl 2761:'.l
(919) 78'2·2832 AaJtolt]h
{919) 781-7558 FAX
I DRA\IN BY:
JSJ . I CHECKED BY:
"~ I DATE:
10/31/90 I PROJECT HO.
35-08480 I
I 1i .,
• -. /cBAJW)~
F.EX:ORD
North Carolina
Departme:nc. of Natural Reeourcco and Comrm..:nic.y Dcvclopm_cnc
Divioion of Environmental Management
P. 0. Box 2:7687 -Raleigh, N. C. 2':7611
''\';"RACTOn ATEC Associates, Inc.
U WELL LOCATION: (Show a sketch of the location on back of
REG
form.)
NO 6 0' , 0
• -.□• Nearest Town: ___ R_a_l_e_1_·_g_h ____________ County ____ 11_a_k_e ________ _
Forest Quadrangle No.llake ---=--,----::,---,-.,--=-,,-,-,---,,---,,----::---,--7:--,,------------1 (Road, Coa:munity, Subdivision, Lot No.)
]OWNER· H 11·burton Services ' a i
·-□
IJJ
I -1] ·~]
I
_'j
1-j]
ADDRESS: 3219 Northside. Drive
TOPOGRAPHY: draw, slope, hill top, valley@
USE OF WELL: Monitor DATE: 12-12090
'TOTAL DEPl'H: 4 5 I. ' DIAMETER: .2'.' and 4"
CASING REM'.JVED:
-feet diameter
25 2"
.
SEALrnGMAXERI.AL:
Neat cement _j_ Sand cement
bass of cement 3 bags of cement --
gals. of 18 yde. of sand water ___
~
gals. of water --
Other
Type mat-Orial NA 1~1]
g[u Amount· NA
~ METHOD OF EMPIACEMEm' OF MA.TERIAL ..
D~
·-r
T.remie method, by Pump, removal
of approximately 25' of 2" and
4 " diameter PVC on. 4-?.-91
D~
I do hereby certify that this well
~bandonment record is true and exact.
:1J/£,_;__ a,
•b -~
lp1
Qfc-/!15~ 11!:_r/!1
C:ign.ature of .Cgntractor or Agent I Date
WELL DIAGRAM: Draw a detailed sketch of the
well showing total depth, depth e...'1d d.irunete
of screens remaining in the well, gravel
interval, intervals of casing perforations,
and depths and types of fill materials used
SEE FIGURE 2
-
...
..
•
.
..
...
•
• I
I nt:.0 :=~·1.nal to the D1.vts1.on of Environmental ~,:inage.me;i;:,.one C"PY to the Drillc:r,
r
7
I JI
i I ]!
.
·-· ••••• -· ••• + •• ···---•• : ·?T1"'·'::: : c:m?s ! , ~
FORMER LOCATION
OF ABOVE GROUND
STORAGE TANKS
8
MW-3
I -0 ~ V SOIL
0
0 E)
1--
~--:..-------LOCATION OF ABANDONED MONITOR WELL Et~
Hw...:·2 MW-2
EMPTY I HALLIBURTON
I
I
I
I
I
SERVICES
,.
:
; I OFJ>ICES I
FENCE !
I
\
I
I
NORTHSlDE DRIVE
\/ELL
HOUSE (J
'
w z >-< ,-.l
,-.
t w "" 0 "' ""
SITE DIAGRAM
HALLIBURTON SERVICES
RALEIGH, NO\UH.CAROLINA
ATEC Environmental Consultants
LOCATION OF ABANDONED MONITOR WELL, MW-2
SCA.LE:
1:50
DRAWN B'C:
JSJ I CHECKED .8 Y :
WC
DATE:
10/31/90
W:Y,:. Olvla_lon ol ATEC Auocl1lu, Inc. \..T~ 661

◄

Davis Circle
Raleigh, Nonh Car~lina (7613 .
(919} 782-283:z R&J""jh
[phone] FAX
PROJECT NO.
35-08480
FlGURE. HO.
1
I J
I,
IJ
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
• J
I j
I J
g J
I J
I J
D J
I J
l:J
I J
I -J
-~f?OUND SURFACE ~
NATURAL SOIL
SCALE
4" DIA. PVC CASING -
GROUT FILLED
v_ 2" DIA. PVC CASING
GROUT FILLED--+--
HORIZONTAL
VERTICAL
1· = 10·
1" = 6'
BOTTOM OF WELL 45'
ABANDONED MONITOR WELL #2
HAWBURTON SERVICES
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
EXCAVATED AREA
APPROXIMATELY 25 FT
DEEP
/ / / /
BACKFILLED WITH SOIL
GROUT FILLED BORE HOLE
APPROXIMATE DIAMETER
---OF BORE HOLE 10"
--,1---FINE FILTER SAND PACK
A.TEC Environmental Consultants
T:Y.; , Division of ATEC Auoe-ta-.,, Inc. '-T.I 6814 Davis Circle Raleigh, Nonh Ca{olina 27613
[phone] Raleigh
[phone] FAX
SCALE: DRAWN BY : CHECKED BY: _ DATE: PROJECT NO. fl:::URE NO_. ·
2 As Showri WAC ·wHR 4/19/91 35-07014
I: l I ·~
I ..
7 I -..
. ]
I -. I I -
.J
I J
I
I J
J
I J
I J
• J
I J
0 J
D ·1
•
I ·1
•
m 7
I 1 •
I J
APPENDIX D
GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS RESULTS
I J
I l
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I ,J
I J
I ..
m J
D J
D J
I J
•
I
I
l "'
J
l ••
I ..
n I .,
· ATEe Environmental W ~n'!~r~c1!~~1nc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suile A
Marietta. Georgia 30066-6293
[404] 427-9456, FAX i! [404l ~27-1907
CLIENT: ATEC ASSOCIATES, INC.
ATTENTION: WAHEED RANA
Solid & Hazan:ot.-sWas:e Site Assessments
Remedia! Design & Construction
Undergrou!'ld Tank: Manasemenl
Asbestos Sur,eys & Ana)'sls
Hydrogcologic :rtviestigaiions & Monitoring
An"lytical Testing!Che~slry.
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
EnvironmemaIAL.dilS & PemiiUing
Exp1oralory Orir.ir,(; & t.-biiloring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-07023 HALLIBURTON PHASE II
LAB PROJECT#: 1509
INVOICE PROJECT #: 08246
MATRIX: WATER DATE
METHOD: MODIFIED 8015 DATE
( PURGE & TRAP)
UNITS: mg/L (ppm)
SAMPLE I.D. STATION. DETECTION
LIMIT
14373
1.4374
MW-2
MW-3
ND-None Detected
Reviewed by:
Kim Humphries
A Subsidiary al American Testing and Engin~ng Corpora.ion
Offices in Major U.S. Cilies(Since 195B
0.5
0.5
DATE SAMPLED: 12-17-90
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 12-18-90
SAMPLE ANALYZED: 12-1.9-90
DATE REPORT: 12-27-90
PARAMETER
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
CONC. RANGE
ND
ND
BORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consuiling Enviror.menla!, Geotechnical ar.
Mate,iafs Em;:nee,s
I
liiiiii iiilii
l_l l_l
iiillil
L..
iiii
L.J
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
liii
L...J L...J -L - -L.J -L. Li
LAB PROJ. NO./
LABORATORY ANALYSIS I ;,
►: (Signature)
~-) ~
lki"Hoo ffi ~
I DATE TIME i
I
w ...
ui 0
Q_
::! 8
a,
;f
Cl
= 0 (/)
0 0 w w
a: .: w a ~ 13 .: <(
Q-
(/) u. a: ow -a:~ . a: w <( ow
0 ID>---' ID ::!Z a,::! w :JO :5~ \, Z(.)
~.,.
~
<1'
.¢ er 0 ~
t:;:, n-'I O 2•. l C, ~-·f----¥'X-"-lc.__+.--l--f--+.C...x·-t---t~2._~+--t--t---l----+--ll--f---l--+-''f---l_-f-____ --J
I r )'l-,-,.. , __ o+.c-~-'-'-, 1'-"'.'>---1· f----+----+-'><~--+--+---l--+--"x--+---J-'1-=--+---1---1--1--+-+--l--+--I.L.:o, '/...+--l-------l
I
! ..
i
~~ ('l.-\::J T~:
6
Received by: (S;gnaMo/ Relinquished by: (S;gnati,ro/ Date I Time•
· r Signatu,;:•-;-1 "'.". -'-t'""'-:D;:;:a t;:;e~/:-CT;::l;;;m;:e;--"""t;;R;:e::c::ei::'.v:ed::.;f o;:-,;-Li'.a:ib:::o;:>,::~•-;: tt~o:::;::-;b::-y::-, -7--;:;D::a-;:to:-/;,T:;-i;::m:::e:-7 -;p::'.,=o-;:je::c:;-t-;M-:a::n~a=g::e-:-,-;/-;P:;;h-oLn-e"'.#:-:--L-------------J
j I (Si9notur•;;?~ y;_ J" . //) /Q I ,,. _
Received by: (Signatme)
= rr,
0
I
c.n
I
(0
----, ::r: =
(0
= =
I ~J
I · 1
a;;1 IVII VI 111 l'C'I IIUI
Consultants
Division of ATEC Associates, Inc.
1300 Williams Drive, Suile A
Marietta, Georgie 30066-6299
(404] 427-9456, FAX 11 (404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Waheed Rana
SOiid & HazafdOus Was\eSi:e Assessments
Remedial Design & Consm.JC:lion
Unde:gto~nd Tank Mana;emcrll
As!lestos Surveys & AnaffsCS
Hydropeotogic lnvestigz6cJn:;& ~onitoring
Anatytical Testing/ Chet:iwy
lmiustria! Hygiene /Ha!'a'd Communication
Environmental Audits & Permttiog
Exploratory Drilling & M.lnilering Wens
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-08480 Halliburton
LAB PROJECT #: 1540
INVOICE PROJECT#: 08246
MATRIX: Water
METHOD: EPA 610
UNITS: ug/L (ppb)
PARAMETER
POLYNUCLEAR
AROMATIC
HYDROCARBON
DETECTION
LIMIT
Naphthalene. 10
Acenaphthylene 10
Acenaphthene 10
Fluorene 10
Phenanthrene 10
Anthracene 10
Fluoranthene ~o
Pyrene 10
Benzo(a)anthracene 10
Chrysene 10
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 10
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 10
Benzo(a)pyrene 10
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 10
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 10
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 10
2-Methyl Naphthalene 10
ND-None Detected
Reviewed by:
Kim Humphries
A Subsidiar1 of Americ8n Testing and Engineering COfPQration
Ot!ices in Major U.S. Cilies/Since 1958
DATE SAMPLED: 01/01/91
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/03/91
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 01/04/91
DATE REPORT: 01/04/91
SAMPLE I.D
LAB: 14592
STATION: MW-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
14593
MW-3
ND'
ND
ND
ND
ND
l<D
ND
ND
No·
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
~a£:r?~
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY SUPERVISOR
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting EnvirOnmental. Geoteclmica/ a
Materials ctlgineets
.....
I
I J
I J
IJ
IJ
I :J
I :J
I :J
i ,· I. ,
I
! 1:J ..
I -J
l:J
I J
I J
I J
lfoble: Oil. S~le-rn
M.ithod Method.
02· Blank Spike ----
801.5 COlll!i)OWidS-mg/kg: i:iq/kg: i.-Reoov
--------0 ---
DiQQQl. 220 <1.0 7~•
Karoaene-<20 <1..0 NS-
Motor Oil 41.00 <10.0 NS::
~t'-' Ex"""..raatQd~·. S,./24/90 9/24/90. 9-/24/90:
Dat.Q Amtl.yz:Qd~ 9/2.7/90 9/26/90 9/2.6/90
Ns· -Not: spiked.
.,. -Sampl~ concentration. tea. high. for spike, recovery· ..
Spike
'l;:.Recov:-
b
NS
NS.
9/24/90:
9/26/90.
.... . . · ., ..... , .. . . ., .
NOBLE: OIL
9009-I.OS
_Paga i ot: s
Dup
spike
%', Racov-
'K'
NS
NS
9'/2.4-/90
9/26/90
I _i_.
1-1)
1-a
1 ·i1
i I 11
I 1)
I ;i
IJ '
I ;:J
I?
...
Pesticides & PCB> --·-------:-Alpha BHC
Beta BHC
c.-a=a BHC
o.lb. BHC
Heptachlor
Al.drin
HapbChlor Epoxid~
Endosulfan l:
lli.Qldrin
ii:, 4-' -DDE
E.ndrin
&ndoaulfan II.
4-1 4-'-DDD
-Elldosulfan Sulfate,
·. 4-1 4.1 -DDT
.Rndrin· Ald.~yda,
Endrin· Katona.-
Mo.thoxyc.'1lor
.Chlordan•
T'oxaphena
Ju:oclor-1016
Aroolor-lZZl
Arocl'or"-·1232
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248 .
Aroclor-1254-
Arcclor-1260
Data Ertract~d:
Date Analyzed~·
surrogates ----~---------0.cachlorobiph,-nyl:·
NS Hot SpikQd
N"oble. Oil ~ample ID
Method. Method
02 Blan.\:: spike. spike --------ug/kg Uc;'/kg-'.\'. Re.oov 5'. Recov -----------<8 <8 NS NS
<8 <8 NS NS
<8 <8 91 105
<:$ <8 Ns· MS
<8. ! <8 l.05 123
<8 <:8'. ll'l. 85
<8. <S NS NS
<8 <8 NS NS
<I6 <I6 95 I.Ol
<16 <.I6 NS N'S
<16 <16 90 70
<l.6 <l.6 NS NS
<l.6 <.1.6 NS NS'
<16 <l.6 NS' NS
<l.6.' <1.6· 9-7 1.05
-<:l:6' <l:6 NS NS:
<16 <::t:6 NS NS
<80 <80 NS, NS
<80. <80 NS NS
<l.60 <l.60 NS NS
<B'l. <8.l. NS' NS
<81. <81. NS NS
<81. <81 NS NS
<8.l. <S'l NS: NS
<8l. .. <81. NS NS
. <:J:.6.0 <:l:60 NS NS
<160 <I60 NS NS'
9/2.1/90 9/21/90 9/21./90 9/21/90
9/26/90 9/26/90 9/26/90 9/26/90
Pc~cant R~coverie~ ( t) -------------
1.40 .l.28 122 l'..l. 7
:·'.~
NOBIZ o:r.,
9009105
:l'll.ge: 6-of s
Oup
SpiJrn.
% Recov -----
NS
NS
79·
NS'
l.29
90
NG.
NS
1.08
NS
72
NS
NS
NS
1.03
.NS
NS
·NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS'
9/2l./90
9/26/90
-----
12J
I.
!!!I -= =a ;.; &iii .. --iiii ----r--·""' ,.,.. .,., ,_,... ,.._ -" . __,.--,_r -,_r--1-J 1-J -----"' ,-·-·.,,
l__/ l-J l-J
L..J 1_1 I_I I__!
L.:.l ·~ --

-
-.. 1-J •--·
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
:OJ. NO. PROJECT NAME ~ Q.o _ 0 •• ·, r LAB PROJ. N0.7
CLIENT i-1 o.._llih, · ,., .\n ~
,MPLEF1S: (Si/ature)
:/, -•1 r) fl, II A -H' •
\MPLING MEI_HOD
13~
SAMPLE
1.0.NO, DATE TIME
I
~JI 9/
>lb) ~3 ) ,,'qJ
•
w !::
(/)
0 a:
Q. "' w -' ::; < ~ i5 0 a:
l) Cl ,: (/)
1:><
)
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
(/)
IL 0:
0 ow
0 a: 3: -ffi w !!! " W< q"' a: IL "' ... ;;;::; w i5 0 ::i'Z ~ u w :JO :'i~ u: < 9 ZU
')<
X
.
=====t===t==~=+=~~=+=f~-4-+-t--±=±=t=
t
j
=
±
=
t
j
~
~
~
t
/

;T;. t=;R~e;c;e;iv;o~d
hy: (Signoturo)
Relinquished by: ($ignaturc) Date I Time
1fa./11 I
Received by: (Signaluro) Relinquished by: (Slgnaturo) Dote., ,rn~
i.C).h~
Relinqulst,ed by: (Signature) Date I Time
I
Received for Laboratory by:
~•tyre) • 11,/jd,-(J
'---./2 /) , , 1/ 11 I/); 1J /,Y_
.
Date I Time Project Manager/ Pt,one #: .
= ('T1 . C> I
CJl I (C>
-; = C:
co
= co
II j DEC-19-91 THU 11:23
I,
I . ATE¢ Environmental
J ~ ~"~~~,!~~~Inc.
I ! 1300 Williams Drive, Suite A
[ Marietta, Georgia 30066·6299 J [404] 427-9456, FAX # [404] 427-1907
ll ,J .~
rj
•• _J
1-.]
l:J
I
.J
IJ
u]
0]
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I J
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-07023
LAB PROJECT #: 3000
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX:
METHOD:
UNITS:
SAMPLE
I.D.
27623
water
EPA 150,1
pH units
STATION
MW-3
ND-None Detected
Reviewed by: KH
08246
P. I 5
Solid & Haiardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic lnvestlgalions & Monitoring
Analytical Testing /Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene !Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Dr.!ling & Monitoring Wells .
Raleigh Site Cleanup
DATE SAMPLED: 11/06/91
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED: 11/14/91
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED: 12/05/91
DATE REPORT: 12/06/91
PARAMETER
pH
5.5
CHEM BORATORY MANAGER
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
.--. ----------------~----.
1J ATEe Environmental
• ~n'!~r~}!~~~lnc.
1300 Williams Drive. Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
{404] 427-9456, FAX # {d04] 427-1907
,..,.., n'"'f ~~ECEIVEO o,r O 5 1901 r·: .~. :. : I '. '.i, n, ~. n -V V . ; ,--·I L' i I , •. ; \ . -~~. -·-·--· ......... __,.. q·
r, ,-C ~ 5 •1ag 1 Sol/if~ Hazardous Waste Sile Assessmen1s l) r' I 1 .., • 'd ' .... • Aeroedial Design & Construction
t'I I ___ .,,_. .. ~!;lrQround Tank Management
L.:J vL.:J1_J U u:leeolos Surveys & Analysis . _ ~r\.12 _________ r1ymogeologic_ lnvestiga:ions & Monitoring
-----{S~ Analytical Teslmg /Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
CLIENT PROJECT #: 35-07023
LAB PROJECT#: 3000
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX: Water
METHOD: EPA 602
UNITS: ug/L (ppb)
08246
PARAMETER DETECTION
LIMIT
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Total Xylenes
Chlorobenzene
1,3 Dichlorobenzene
1,4 Dichlorobenzene
1,2 Dichlorobenzene
ND-None Detected
. H
Reviewed by:}<
Kirn Humphries
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
A Subsidiary oi American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices ir: Major U.S. Cities/Since 1958
Raleigh Site Cleanup
DATE SAMPLED: 11/07/91
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 11/25/91
SAMPLE I.D.
LAB: 27623
STATION: MW-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND .. ND
ND
11/14/91
11/18/91
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY MANAGER
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
Consulting Environmental, Gearecilnica/ and
Materials Engineers
J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I ]
l"J
I]
IJ
I J
ATE€ Environmental 'W ~n~~T~c
1
!~~~1nc.
1300 1Mlliams Drive, Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
(404] 427-9456, FAX# (404] 427-1907
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
RECEIVED DES O 5
Solid & Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Remedial Design & Ccnstruc:ion
Underground Tank Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hydrogeologic Investigations &"Monitoring
Analylical Testing /Chemistry .
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling & Monitoring Wells
CLIENT PROJECT#:
LAB PROJECT#:
35-07023 Raleigh Site Cleanup
3000
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX: Water
METHOD: EPA 8270
UNITS: ug/L (ppb)
PARAMETER
ACID EXTRACTABLES
08246
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Reviewed by: XH
Kim Humphries
A Subsidiary of American Testing and Engineering Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. C11ies/Since 1958
DATE SAMPLED: 11/07/91
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 11/25/91
DETECTION
LIMIT
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
50
50
20
10
10
10
SAMPLE I.D.
LAB:
STATION:
N
11/14/91
11/19/91
27623
MW-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CHE
CHEMISTRY
LABORATORY MANAGER
DIVISION
Consufling Em•!ronmer:tal. Geo1echnica: an~
Ma:erials Engineers
I :J
IJ
111
11
ATES Environmental
W/ ~n~~T~}!~~lnc. V· 1300 Williams Drive. Suite A
Marietta, Georgia 30066-6299
(404] 427-9456, FAX # (404] 427-1907
RECEIVED DEC O 5 19
Solid & Hazardous Waste Sile Assessmen:s
Remedial Design & Construction
Underground Tani< Management
Asbestos Surveys & Analysis
Hyd°rogeologic Investigations & Monitoring
Analytical Testing !Chemistry
Industrial Hygiene/Hazard Communication
Environmental Audits & Permitting
Exploratory Drilling &·Monitoring Wells
CLIENT: ATEC Associates, Inc.
ATTENTION: Graham Simmerman
CLIENT PROJECT#: 35-07023 Raleigh Site Cleanup
LAB PROJECT#: 3000
INVOICE PROJECT#:
MATRIX: Water
METHOD: EPA 8270
UNITS: u·g/L (ppb)
PARAMETER
BASE/NEUTRAL
EXTRACTABLES
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzoic Acid
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
08246
Benzyl Alcohol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2~ethyl-hexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Benzyl butyl phthalate
4-Chloronaniline
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene.
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Di-n-butyl phthalate
A Suos1diary of Americar: Testing 3.nd Eng.in~ng Corporation
Offices in Major U.S. Cities/ Since .'958
DATE SAMPLED: 11/07 /91
DATE SAMPLE RECEIVED:
DATE SAMPLE ANALYZED:
DATE REPORT: 11/25/91
DETECTION
LIMIT
10
10
10
50
10
10.
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
SAMPLE I.D.
LAB:
STATION:
11/14/91
11/19/91
27623
MW-3,
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Consultihg Environmental. Geotecr:nical and
Materials Engineers
I r;_
!I -RECEIVE[ OEC O 5 19
I t
'1
PARAMETER DETECTION SAMPLE I.D.
BASE/NEUTRAL LIMIT LAB: 27623 EXTRACTABLES STATION: MW-3
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10 ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10 ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 ND J,J'-Dichlorobenzidene 20 ND Diethylphthalate 10 ND Dimethylphthalate 10 ND
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 10 ND
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10 ND
Di-n.-octylphthlate 10 ND
Fluoranthene 10 ND
Fluorene 10 ND Hexachlorobenzene 10 ND
Hexachlorobutadiene 10 ND
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 10 ND Hexachloroethane 10 ND
Indeno(l,2,3,-cd)pyrene 10 ND
Isophorone 10 ND
2-Methylnaphthalene 10 ND
Naphthalene 10 ND
2-Nitroaniline 50 ND
3-Nitroaniline 50 ND
4-Nitroaniline 50 ND
Nitrobenzene 10 ND
N-Nitrosodimethylarnine 2.0 ND
N-Nitrosodiphenylarnine 10 ND
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylarnine 10 ND
Phenanthrene 10 ND
Pyrene 1() ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10 ND
ND-None Detected
Tentatively Identified Compounds
COMPOUNDS
unknown
unknown
2,4 bis(l,1-dimethylethyl)phenol
unknown
aliphate or branched hydrocarbon aliphate or branched hydrocarbon unknown
unknown
RECEIVED DEC C 5 19'
RETENTION TIME
9.58
10.98
19.65
20.79
.26. 09
29.79
31. 93
32.68
* Only 8 compounds were greater than 10% of internal s.tandard areas.
Reviewed by:
Kim Humphries RANDY BROWN
CHEMISTRY LABORATORY MANAGER CHEMISTRY DIVISION
\_J L...J
i"SAMPLING METHOD
W:i1A/5f'-r /ss
SAMPLE
I.D. NO. DATE
/v\W-3 fl 1()7
L...,j L-.J L-.J
.
w !::
(I)
-' i5 (I)
0 a: Q_ <D w :::; <( 1--
TIME 0 a: <(
<) (.'.) :;:
I{'-5> ,.,, X X
L-.J
0 0
w w
a: u:: w 0 1---' u u. <(
~ L-;j
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
(I) u. a: ow
a:~ .. a:
0 w
~
W<( ow <Di---' aJ :::;z <D:::; :JO <(::, zu -' z
X 4 X
&.....I
I
&.....I '-
111".e, X (.,, X )( SI sz X 2-
Ii'~~ X y 1-
y 2-
y::
, V I
:0 S, D A,, Vl}t, f'Si _; I
, f ,
j
rr c
i:t_
<a r1
[)
~ ___ _t_ __ _j_ __ J-_j__jl___L,_J.,--...L_...i_...J__...I_J__j__,-L_..,.L_L___L__J_...J___J,--...L..--1-:-=:..L--,--:--:-1-----------eri
Aelinqu~',11 by: (Signat~He) Dote/ Time Received by: (Signalure) Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/ Time Received by: (Signature) ~ ~
,✓~ff' ' O //-/3-'j/ 8'01. ,b
1V"Y74.T'~/'....-~'·.:_~.:_-.::.·~:..·-:..--t-A,:;t-...=c-· --f-:::-:~:;:-....!:.:.,.,.:...!.f''-;::-::--.-=;-;:-:-;-:;:::'.':::::-::::--;::-;:----j-~~;-;:;:=:---r;:;::;:-::;--;-;:::-::::-;-;;;::'.:::-;:---'---------7n
, ~inquished by: (sfgnaturo) Date/ Time Received for Laboratory by: Date/ Time Project M~nager /Phone#:
I ~;~)11-~ 1-o/J#s/v#"' c;;·M\'AA~ s·,,;,""'"'"w (q,q) 7sz-2-e~2 ·
,~ J I
I ..
I ~ J I . J
•• J I . J
I :J
u J
I J
I J
I • J
I J
I J
I J
I J
I l
I J
D J
APPENDIX E
SOIL STOCKPILE DOCUMENTS
CERTIFICATE OF DISPOSAL
STOCKPILE SOIL ANALYSES
' ii '--
!!!!I 1!!11!
~
== liiiiiil -
1034
-I .. J
lllill --
Date September 261 1991
Certificate of Disposal
Whereas, Noble oil Services, Inc. is a corporation under the laws of the State of North Carolina with its
principal place of business in Sanford, North Carolina, and
Whereas, Noble Oil Services, Inc. utilizes technologically advanced procedures to dispose of petroleum
contaminated soil.
Now, Therefore, Noble Oil Services, Inc. does hereby issue this certificate to:
HALLIBUR'l'ON SERVICES
To evidence the disposal of: 1241.48 Tons of contaminated soil located at the
3219 Northside Drive site, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Said disposal has been completed in a manner consistent with acceptable environmental standards and in
compliance with applicable rules and regulations set forth by State and Federal authorities on or about the
date stated above.
C.
-.-·---·--·-------.
-
.,.
.,
_,.
' ·, ~
I _'" ~
I j·-
1-,
.--....... . .... ,,v,1 ... ~ :.,
~ ;~ :~gzWr~~ /.,i:::--
.
~
,. -...::r-::.
-

•

--

•

; _: J : .:.,..:; .. _·.:
~ ,~a-•a•.-;
_'i'!f. I -J~~~, !:,•/r-o..wf(':fc/ £ol,ouuc•q, Jor.
1758 Gtdt A,.,.,rr octobe, e, 1990
H?ELI ID: 9009146 1-.J
&vnt~in t'ic i,,-, C4 PtiJO
/415i yµ.~u
fAJ /115: 96l-l7/J Client PO: None Giv~~ Pag.-. 1 of 8 I Joble Oil S8rvices, Inc . . 617 Clyde Rhynn Drive. I· ~ntord, NC :Z7330
·dttqntion: Mr. G.C, Hauaer I ·J.:bje.c~: Analysli.s of One -Soil Sample, R~ceivQd 9/24/90, I -J11 ssple vas analyzed for purgaable halogenat0d organic compounds U accordi,;g to U.S. EPA Method 8010 (Test Me.:.hodcs for Evaluating Sol id. "1-ste --SW846, 3rd ~d., 1SS6). Results ara preisented in Tabl4 1. The
,J-thoo cen be. i.umme.rizQd as follows:
· I _J
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
c.
IJ
IJ
UJ
IJ
IJ
soil sample was introduced into a·purge and trap apparatus. Helium _ia J:iubbled. through the water contained in a specially designed purging cha!ll.ber at ainbient tempQrature. The-purgeable h&log~nated orga.'lic co~pounds are GfficiQntly transfatted fro~ the aqueous phase to the vapor phase. ~he 1
vapor i, swept through a sor~ent column wher~ the purgeables ara trapped. After purging is completed, tht sorbant column ia heated and back tlushad vith hQlium to desorb the purge<1.bles onto a gas chromatographic column. -The gas chromatograph-i~ temperature programined to separat~ the purgeables which are then detected with a Hall detgctor.
:~robl~ 0il
90091,t
P~ga 2 of 8 1-];cil s=ple ..-as analy:!:ed for purgell.ble aromati"c compounds according _ :o u.s. EPA xothod 8020 (Test MQthods for Evaluating Solid Waste • I s;;2 4,;, 3rd Ed. , 1986) . Results a:-e presented in Table 2. The method _J"'n be st.-=arized as follm,s:
I soil sampla was extracted into purge and trap grade methanol. .a.n aliquot of the !!IE)thanal extract is added to _]· organic free ~atar and introduced into a purge and trap apparatus. Helium is bubbled through the w~ter contained in II a specially designed purging cha:nber, The purgeable II_] aromatic compounds are •~ficiently transferr«d from the . aqueaua phase to the vapor phase .. The vapor is swept I through a sarbent column where th.:i purgeablets are trapped, · · After purging is completad, the sorbant column is heat2d and J bacl< flushitd with hali= to des orb the purge ables onto. a-ge.s I chromatographic column. The gas chromatograph is J temperaturo prograuod ta ~epa:ratei tho purgea.bles which are then detected with a PID detector.
I soil cample was analyzed for polychlorinated biphenyls(PCB's) and · J1lorinat2d pesticides according ta U.S. EPA Method aoso (EPA Test 1thad$ for Evaluating Solid WastG; SW846 --3rd Ed. 1986). RQsUlts are I ,sented in Table 3, The method can be gut:IJllarizQd ns follows:
J I J .A measurQd weight o! sample is extracted with acetone/hexane (1:1). The extract is dried and exchanged to hexan11. during concentration ta a final volume of 10 mL or loss. Th• · I ·] concentrate i~.injected into a gas chromatragraph equipped· with an •lectron captura <letector set specifically for the sctparation and measurQlllent of PCBs and chlorinated I pa.sticidac. ·
]i1 s~mple was an&iyzed for highar boiling petroleum hydrocarbons I ising guidelines establisha.d in the Regione.l water Quality control j ard (RWQCB) waking Underground Fuel Tank (LUFT) manual. This rnathod , also known as tha modifie~ 8015 protocol. Results are sullll'llarized in .~ble 4, Tha method can be Sl.lmlllariza.d aa follows: I J
I J
Higher boiling patroleum hydrocarbons such as diesel, k•rosenQ and motor oil are extracted into organic solvent and analyzgd using a gas chromatograph equipped with an FID.
I :iil sample was prepared by extracting it with diluta acetic acid. "; 24 hours following EP.i\ Method 1310. The resulting extraot was Jtored end acid qiga.ated using EPA Method 3010 and/or 3020, The ' ,tate waa analyzGd for requested metals us:ing Inductiv~ly Coupled I ; •\ ~la=a 11pectro11copy or Atomic Absorption i:.pectraphatametry. The Jul~ing values are the E.P. Toxicity concentrations tor the requestgd • Alo. Th~ results arQ presented in Tabl~ 5.
.. · ,J!::lc Gil
:.;•~::J9l"t6
I'agra J of 8
l .h4 11a re,.ult& were obtained by following standard laboratory rl ,edure.s1 the liability ot Mid-Pacific Environmental Laboratory, Inc. r ·1 not excaed the amount paid for this report. In no avent shall I ·_ ?11.oific be liablg to:r: special or consequential damag.,i;. fj . . •
D -1
Nobl~ Oil Sampl2 ID
8010 Compounds ---------------------Dicb.lorodi!luoromethan&
Chloromatllane
Vinyl Chloride
B=m=ethane
Cllloi:oethane·
~richlorotluoromethane
I,l-Dichloroethene
Methylen~ Chloride
t:rans-1, 2-o·ichloroethena,
l,1.-0ichloroethane
ciu-1,2-DicihloroethenQ
.Chlorofo=
1,1,1.-Trichloroethane
carbon T<ttrachlorid.o·
l.,2-Dichloroeth~na
Trichl.oroathsme-
1, 2-Dichloropropane
B:r::omod-ichlor:omethane
t:rans~i, 3-Dichloroprope.nee
J.:,I.,2-Trichloroethana
· Tetrachl.oroathene.
Dihromochlorom111thane.
Chlorohenzene.
Bro)llo!orm
· !, !, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethana
·l, 3-Dichlorobenzene
I., 4--Dichlorobenzen&·
I., :l•Dichlorobenzene·
rreon-11.3 *
Date.· Analyzed:
,
02.
ug/kg ------
<1.3
<1.3
<13
<13
<13
; <2.5
<13
<I3
<1.3
<13
<13
<l.3
l.40
<13
<13
80
<13
<l.3
<25
<25
<13
<13
<13
<13
<38
<1.3
<:13
<13
<l::3
lO/l/90
MQthod
Blank:
ug/kg -----
<l.3
<13
<13
<13
<:13
<2!S
<1.3
<13
<13
<.13
<l.3
<13
<13
<IJ
<l.3
<1.3:
<l.3
<13
<2:5
<2.5
<13
<13
<l.3
<1.:r
<38
<l.3.
<l.3
<13
<:l.3
10/I/90
Storage
Blank -----
ug/L ----<0 .. 5
<0.5
<0 .• 5
<0 ►5
<0-~!r
<1. •. 0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
co·. s
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<O: •. S.
<0: • .5
<0: •. .5
<0 .. 5
<0:. 5
<l. •. 0
<l..0
<.o·~s
<0 ,.5
<0 • .5
<0.5
<2
<0 • .5
<o.s·
<O .• 5
<0 •. 5
10/1/90
Surrogate Fercant Recoveries ----------------------------------------
Bromochloromethane: I.11 94-87
.. -1, 1, 2-T::ichloro-l., 2 1 2-=i:t:luoroethan"'
NS -Not Spiktd
. Sp.ike
►•. Recov
.NOBLE: t>
9009-1:.0~
Pag€t <~ ,
DU;
Spil:c
\-RecO'. ----
NS ·Ne
NS w
60 5~
NS NE
NS NE
NS NE
7Z 7l
NS Ne
74 7-;_
.NS NE
83 e;
NS N~
NS NE
75 GS
NS Ne
89 8 F.
NS-NS
NS NE
NS N£.
NS· m
55 5'.
NS m
69 6!
NS Ni
NS N:
NS Nt
.NS Ne
5°5 s,
NS N:
10/1./90 1.0/1/9(
( %-) ----------
104 1.0
g~
1 u~
IJ
';_,
NOE!£ OG.
90091.05.
Fag4lr S: o:f. 8 gJ Tab.l.er z. Vola:tile: Organic Result:a;
uJ
IJ
Noble: Oil. Sai.ple-ID
J Method so:20 Compounds. I l;,&lZ:eDQ ---
J '1:ol.uene.
I. c:J:rlo.robenzen&
E:t:llyll:enzena
]
Tottl. Xylenesc
l.~3..;Jicitlorobenzane I L,4-Dicltlorobenzen~ J L, z.-niclrloro~z;&na-
1. "\.te: Anal.yze~:.
] suo:ogatQ.· . . I BrOlllO:fluorcbenzatnec
I .J. Na -Uot Spik11d
J I
IJ
]
'1
ll
11
I :l -g
l
M•t.hcd: Storuga-Dup
oz Blank: Blank: spike Spi.k6l -----
ug/kg ug/kg-ug-/kg-~ Racov %-RQCOY --------
<1.:t <l:r <0.5 71. 67'.
<J.5" <25 <1. 7l 6!5
<1.3 <l.T <0 .• !I' NS NS.
<1.3 <lJ <O.S NS: NS.
<38: <3.S. <2. NS: NS
<.I.J. <1.:r <O'.!S' NS-NS
<l3 <13 · <0 •. .!5. NS NS
<l.3 <13 <0·.5 NS NS:
lO/I/90 10/1/90 I0/1/90 10/l/90 10/1/90:
Parce..'l'\t Recovaries: (%-) --------------------as· 751· 92. 77 72.
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
1-:J
1·J
D ·l
1·J
1·;1
1tl
Ii,.
1"iD
-----------Ju=senic
Ba.I:ium
cadmiw.r Chrouu=
IAlid
Mcu-cury
Sel.aniu.=.
silvo.r
Tabl<1c ~. Het.:tl!i Results
Nobla· oil'_Sample ID
02. SpLlce-D1.lp
EJ:'l,., -----------
Method ug/L %'. Ra-::ov RFD --------------___ ._._
6010 <100 107 o.
6010 <10 103 0
t5010 <S.O 10!5 0
6010 <10 104 0
601.0 <SO 1.osr 0.
7470 <1.. o· 87 0
6010 <200 9a a
6010 <10 9J.. o:
NOBU: 01I.
9009-1.0ff
l?o.ga 8' o t: G
Me.thcd.
M~thod.. O<!tmc~iOD
Blz.nk Lil!rit
ug/L ug/L ----------
<l.00 100
<10 10
<5.0 5.0
<10 10
<50 so
<t~o 1..0·
<ZOO zoo
<10 1.0
In •
0:J
D iJ
l:J
IU
I lJ
l ;l ,.
APPENDIX F
SITE SENSITIVITY INDEX FORMS
I t J I
IZ. /Jo/90 Site Sensitivity Evaluation (SSE) C.,tJdh,::iJ,, 11-d!,uhn oJ.<;o, Co,.:atniru:rc.~ !->,•,)..v.:,lnun •"°"""' C-oirn.o Oh:C:.lcv'\ o/ ~u~h(a./ -~CC...,,,,,.,...,nl
characteristic
Soil pH
Crain Size•
Udden-Wentworlh Scale
Are Relict Structures.
Sedimentary Structures,
and/or Textures present
in Lhe zone of contami,rnlion
& underlying ··soils"
Contaminanl Class
Distance from Location of
Deepest Contaminated Soll
(>IO ppm TPH) to Seasonal
_,, High Water Table
Is the Top of Bedrock
located above the Seasonal
Low Water Table ?
Is a Confining Layer
presen l between bottom of
contaminated soil and waler
table?
Time since release of
contaminant has
occurred
· ArtiOcal Conduits
presen l within the zone
of con lamination
Condition
pH<S.O or pH >9.0
8.0 < pH <9.0
5.0 s pH <6.0
6.0 s nH se.o
Con1;:ii:\S )'.!/3. Gruvd lo Coar!ic $,a,1:J, (> I 12mm)
Conl:ii1:.s >2/3, Medium lo Fine S:iot! (< I /2mm • I /Smm)
Cont:ii~~ >1/3. Very F'1ne: Sand lo Cr..Jrsr: Sill
(<: I /8mm • l t5.~mm)
Conlai:•_.;, >2/J. l-,·1ed.1um Slit and Clay(< I /32mm)
Piesent_ and lntersecl!ng
the 5-,,sonal High \Valer Table
Present but not Intersecting
lhe &asonal High Water Table·
None Presenl
L,i-.,· lo Medium Bolling
Polnl Hydrocarbo~s
IC!-ClSI and
"some military Jel fuels"
II High Boiling Hydro-
carbons IC! 2-C20I and
"other Jct fuels"
5 • !Ofeeet
> l 0-40
>40 feet
Yes
No
No
Yes
> 1 yr. or unknown
6 months-! year
<6 months
Pr,senl & lntersecllng
the Seasonal High
Waler Table
Present but not inler-
sec!ing the Seasonal High
Waler Table
Nol Present
_n
Rating
~
?.
2
0
10
7
4
0
10
5
0
10
5
10
5
0
5
0
5
0
10
5
0
10
5
0
TOTAL
SCORE
0
m
o I
0
REMEDIATION CLOSURE REPORT HALLIBURTON INDUSTRIAL SERVICES.SITE
RALEIGH, NORTH:CARDLINA
12/19/91 fig1..!re 2
Site Sensitivity Evaluation (SSE) Cwdtltw•J<,R...-1,oao-, o/Sol: C-~•«i byP..,...i......, NorV: c..,..,......, Ci<.,u""' o/0.~in.-v,...,u-,
Characteristic
Soll pH
Gram Size•
Uddcn-Wentwonh Scale
Are Relict Slructurcs.
Sedimentary Structures,
,1nd/or Textures present
in the zone of contamJnaUon
& underlying ·'soils"
Comaminant Class
Distance from Location of
Deepest Contaminated Soll I> l 0 ppm TPH) to &asonal
High Water Table
Is the Top of Bedrock
located above the Seasonal
Low \Va[u Table ·7
Is a Connntng Layer
present between bottom of
contaminated soil and water
table?
Tl.me since release of
r.onlamlnant has
or:r.urred
:\J"liOcJI Conduits
present within the zocc
or contamination
• Fl.t;urc: 3
Condition
pH<S.0 or pH >9.0
8.0 < pH <9.0
5.0 5 pH <6.0
6.0 s H s8.0
Canta~ >213. d~avd lo Coa.r3c Sa.nd. (:>l/2cnm)
Con1..:11ru >2/3, Mc:dJum lo Flnc Sa.nd f<l /2rnm • l /Bmm)
Cont:1.1ru >2/3, Very F1nc Sand to Co.inc Slit
(< I /Bmm -

1

/32rurnl
Cont.mu >2/3. Mc:dJum SUt and Clay {<l/J2mm)
Present and lntersccung
the &asonaJ High Water Table
Present but not Intersectlng
the &asonaJ High Water Table
None Present
Low to Medlwn Bolling
Point Hydrocarbons
IC 1-C l SJ and
"some military Jet fuels"
JI High Bolling Hydro-
carbons [C12-C20l and
"other Jet fuels"
5 -10 fceet
> 10-40
>40 feet
Yes
No
No
Yes
> l yr. or unknown
6 months-! year
c6 months
Present & lnlersccung
the &asonaJ High
Water Table
Present but not Inter-
secting the Seasonal High
Water Table
Nol Present
Rating
4
2
2
0
10
7
4
0
10
5
0
10
5
10
5
0
5
0
5
0
10
5
0
10
5
0
TOTAL
SCORE
2
0 I
0
27
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REPORT OF FINDINGS
SITE NO. 29
REA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Mayl997
Provided by GERAGHTY & MJUER, INC.
~~u~LC ~rimberger~M.
Staff Scientist
Frederic . Rash, E.I.T.
oject Engineer/Project Manager
William H. Doucette, Jr., Ph.D., P.G.
Associate/Project Officer
m \'cm_rakiQh\dat&\aprojcclw:dot\nc0360.047',q,ort\rcpartl.doc\1~May-97
GERAGHTY & MlLLER, INC. 0
I
I
6
0
I
0
0
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONTENTS (continued)
Page
PREFACE ................................................................................................................................. iv
1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... : ...................... 1-l
2.0 SITE HISTORY AND BACKGROUND .......................................................................... 2-l
2.1 SITE HISTORY ......................................................................................................... 2-l
2.2 CHEMICAL MATERIAL USAGE ............................................................................. 2-l
2.3 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS ............................................. 2-l
3.0 SITE ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY ........................................ 3-1
3.1 ·soIL INVESTIGATION ............................................................................................ 3-l
3.1.1 Soil-Vapor Survey .............................................................................................. 3-l
3.1.2 Direct Push Technology (DPT) Advancement.. ................................................... 3-2
3.2 GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT ............................................................................ 3-3
3.2.1 Temporary Piezometer Installation and Sampling ............................................... ,3-3
3.2.2 NCDEHNR Well Sample Collection ................................................................... 3-4
3.2.3 Production Well Sample Collection ..................................................................... 3-5
3.2.4 Monitor-Well Installation, Development, and Sampling ....................................... 3-6
3.2.5 Slug Testing ....................................................................................................... 3-7
3.2.6 Well Surveying ................................................................................................... 3-8
3.3 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION .................................................................................... 3-8
3 .4 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY AND TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURES ....................... 3-9
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND POTENTIAL RECEPTORS ................................ .4-1
4.1 ADJACENT PROPERTY USES ............................................................................... .4-l
4.2 TOPOGRAPHY AND SURFACE-WATERDRAINAGE ......................................... .4-1
4.3 HYDROGEOLOGY ................................................................................................... 4-l
4.3.l Regional Geology/Hydrogeology ........................................................................ 4-l
4.3.2 Site-Specific Geology ......................................................................................... 4-3
4.4 GROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEM ........................................................................ .4-3
4.4.1 Shallow Groundwater Flow Direction ................................................................. 4-3
4. 4 .2 Hydraulic Gradients .......................................................................................... : .. 4-4
4.4.3 Hydraulic Properties ........................................................................................... 4-4
4.5 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS ....................................................................................... 4-4
4.6 ROUTES OF MIGRATION ...................................................................................... .4-5
5.0 DATA REVIEW AND VALIDATION ............................................................................. 5-l
5.1 FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE COMPONENTS .................................................... 5-l
5:2 LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE COMPONENTS .................................... 5-2
5.2.1 Target Chlorinated Solvents for Geoprobe™ Soils (USEPA SW-846
Method 8021) ..................................................................................................... 5-2
5.2.2 Target Chlorinated Solvents for Geoprobe™ and NCDEHNR Monitor
Wells Groundwater (SM 6230D) ........................................................................ 5-3
5.3 Target Chlorinated Solvents For Monitor-Well Groundwater (USEPA SW-846
Method 8260B) ........................................................................................................... 5-5
5.4 OVERALL DATA ASSESSMENT ............................................................................ 5-5
m \\sJn_nleish~\aprojcct\ncdol\ne0360.<M2'zcp:in\rcport2.doc\ll-May-91 Ill
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
I_
D
I
u
D
0
u
g
I
CONTENTS (continued)
Page
6.0 RESULTS AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS ........................................................................ 6-l
6.1 SOIL INVESTIGATION RES UL TS .......................................................................... 6-1
6.2 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION RESULTS ...... ~ .............................................. 6-2
6.3 SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS ........................................................................................ 6-3
6.4 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................ 6-5
6.5 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 6-5
7.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 7-l
TABLES
2-1. Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data for NCDEHNR Wells Sampled during
Investigation of Pollution Incident #6778.
2-2. Summary of Soil Analytical Data Sampled during NCDEHNR Well Installation of
Pollution Incident #6778.
3-1. Summary of Soil-Vapor Survey Data.
3-2. Monitor-Well Construction Summary.
4-1. Summary of Groundwater Elevation Data.
6-1. Summary ofGeoprobeTM Soil Analytical Data -Sampled on May 15 and 17, 1996.
6-2. Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data for Samples Collected on May 15 and 17,
1996, Compared to NCDEHNR Analytical Data from Samples Collected during an
Assumed Date (1992).
6-3. Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data -Sampled on September 30, 1996.
FIGURES
2-1. Site Location Map.
2-2. Site Map.
3-1. Soil-Vapor Sample Location Map -May 14, 1996.
3-2. Geoprobe™ Soil Sample Location Map -May 15-17, 1996.
3-3. Dissolved Target and Non-Target Chlorinated Solvents In Groundwater Concentration
Map.
4-1. Surficial Aquifer Potentiometric Surface Map, November 7, 1996.
4-2. Bedrock Aquifer Potentiometric Surface Map, November 7, 1996.
5-1. Regional Isoconcentration Map for Trichloroethene in Groundwater.
5-2. Regional Isoconcentration Map for I, 1-Dichloroethene in Groundwater.
5-3. Regional Target Chlorinated Solvents Detected In Groundwater.
APPENDICES
A. NCDOT and NCDEHNR Letter of Agreement.
B Cood ■ioed Ptelim.inaty Assessme111/Sili 1 sp :ten lJC Sape1fund S t':n.
C. EDR Report.
D. Boring Logs and Well Construction Diagrams.
E. In-Situ Hydraulic Conductivity (Slug) Tests.
F. Laboratory Analytical Data Reports.
jd a,1,pmje<tmlotln<0360.042'<q,ort"-'1do<II J.M,,y•91 IV
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
0
g
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
REPORT OF FINDINGS
SITE NO. 29
REA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
PREFACE
In 1989, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) began an
assessment of asphaltic materials testing laboratory sites within the state. Due to the extent of
time and cost for the NCDOT and the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) to undertake such an· assignment, the 1996 General Assembly
provided limited funding for an assessment of the 72 sites located within the state. The mandate
by the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee required the assessments and
NCDEHNR review be completed by July 1, 1997.
Pursuant to Memorandum of Agreements (4/1/96, 7/1/96, and 1989 MOA) signed
between the NCDOT and NCDEHNR, the seventy two sites will be assessed and analyzed by
agreed upon methods for these contaminants only: carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethene (ICE),
1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), and their degradation compounds ("the target chlorinated
I
solvents"). NCDEHNR has agreed to respond in writing within 2 to 3 weeks upon receipt of the
72 assessment reports.
GERAGHTY [,f MILLER. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
u
I
I
I
REPORT OF FINDINGS
SITE NO. 29
REA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents findings of soil and groundwater assessment activities conducted from
May through November 1996 on behalf of the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) at the REA Construction Company facility, which housed Site No. 29 asphalt testing
laboratory. On-site testing of asphalt following the American Society of Testing Materials
(ASTM) Method D 2172-88 was conducted. The procedure used chlorinated solvents for the
quantitative extraction of bitumen from bituminous paving mixtures. The testing procedures
required the use of one or more of the_ following chlorinated solvents: carbon tetrachloride,
frichloroethene (TCE), or 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA).
The field activities were conducted on behalf of the NCDOT Safety and Loss Control
Division to define the extent of target chlorinated solvents impacts to the soil and groundwater at
the site. The contaminants consist of the chlorinated solvents (target chlorinated solvents) carbon
tetrachloride, TCE, 1, 1, 1-TCA, and their degradation products ( chloroform; methylene chloride;
methyl chloride; cis-1,2-dichloroethene; trans-1,2-dichloroethene; 1, 1-dichloroethene; 1, 1-
dichloroethane; vinyl chloride; and chloroethane ). The disposition of the spent solvents from the
former testing operations is not well documented. However, it is known that spent solvents were
generated as a result of asphalt testing and such spent solvents may have been stored, or possibly
spilled, or disposed of on-site, thereby creating the potential for soil and groundwater
contamination.
In 1989, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) was entered into between NCDOT and
North Carolina Department of Environmental Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR),
Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Groundwater Section to conduct assessments at 72 sites
within the state where asphalt testing was conducted. NCDOT conducted initial screening
investigations in 1989 pursuant to the MOA, followed by the preparation of Comprehensive Site
Assessments (CSAs) at 22 of these sites. In 1996, with funding from the General Assembly and a
\'cm_ ralcigh\data\apn:,ject\nc:dot\nc0360.042\rcportvq,ortl.doc\13-M.y-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
R
D
D
0
I
g
I
1-2
mandate from the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee, NCDOT continued site
assessments at the remaining sites.
An MOA between NCDOT and DWQ was signed in April 1996, outlining the scope of
work to be-followed during the Phase I Screening Site Investigation at the asphalt priority sites.
The site assessments were to be conducted based on the agreed-upon methods and in accordance
with DWQ's "Groundwater Section Guidelines for the Investigation and Remediation of Soils and
Groundwater," (NCDEHNR, 1993). The assessments were to focus only on the specific
contaminants associated with former asphalt testing: carbon tetrachloride, ICE, I, I, 1-TCA, and
their degradation products ("the target chlorinated solvents"). Copies of the letters of agreement
and the target chlorinated solvents transformation pathways flow chart are included in
Appendix A.
The primary objective of the assessment was to better establish the vertical and horizontal
profile of target chlorinated solvents in the soils and groundwater in the vicinity of the former
asphalt testing laboratory. This investigation was focused at the immediate vicinity of the former
asphalt testing laboratory (Site 29). The findings of this investigation serve to supplement the
extensive ongoing NCDEHNR investigation at the upgradient, adjacent Greshams Lake Industrial
Park which identified the presence of an upgradient off-site source of target chlorinated solvents.
Therefore, as outlined in the site-specific Work Plan and the Project Quality Assurance Plan
(Project QAP) for the North Carolina Department of Transportation Asphalt Testing Facilities
(Geraghty & Miller, 1996), Geraghty & Miller personnel:
• conducted a soil-vapor survey at I 8 locations in the vicinity of the former asphalt
testing laboratory;
• collected a water sample from the onsite production well;
• obtained soil samples at six locations around the former asphalt testing laboratory
building using Geoprobe™;
• obtained groundwater samples at one location around the former asphalt testing
laboratory building using Geo probe™;.
l'c,n_nloiat>"""\apn>j«lln<dc<'m)360.042',q,ortV<p<X12do<ll3-M,y-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-3
• installed three shallow groundwater monitor wells;
• collected groundwater samples from the site monitor wells and select NCDEHNR
monitor wells for analysis of target chlorinated so!vents;
• Conducted aquifer (slug) testing on three selected wells to determine aquifier
characteristics;
• Gauged groundwater levels in the site monitor wells and the NCDEHNR monitor
wells to evaluate shallow groundwater flow direction; and
• Surveyed the top of casings at each site and NCDEHNR monitor well.
1,.,,_BI,~'<lololopoj«tlnalotlndl360.04,_vopo,12.dooll3-M,y•97
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
u
D
g
a
2.0 SITE HISTORY AND BACKGROUND
A discussion of the operations and site history, chemical material usage, and previous
environmental investigations is provided in the following subsections.
2.1 SITE IDSTORY
The NCDOT formerly conducted on-site testing of asphalt at the facility. The testing
procedure required the use of a target chlorinated solvent to extract asphalt from the gravel and
stone make-up material so the remaining clean gravel could be sieve tested to check
specifications. The site location is shown in Figure 2-1. A layout of the subject site and adjacent
property is shown in Figure 2-2. The NCDOT no longer conducts asphalt testing at the site.
This investigation was confined to the area surrounding the former asphalt testing
laboratory because (I) asphalt testing activities were confined to that building, and (2) based on a
knowledge of laboratory practices, the source area (i.e., contaminated soil), if present, would be
in the immediate vicinity of the building.
2.2 CHEMICAL MATERIAL USAGE
Chemical solvent types used during the test procedure varied as regulations restricted the
use of certain chemicals. Historically, the target chlorinated solvents used in asphalt testing w,ere
carbon tetrachloride, TCE, and 1,1,1-TCA or "TRICO." According to NCDOT personnel,
historical records on solvent types and usage for the Site No. 29 asphalt testing laboratory do not
exist.
2.3 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
Background data was obtained from the NCDEHNR., NCDOT (aerials}, and
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR).
Review of data compiled from the NCDEHNR DWQ, Groundwater Section, shows that a
pollution incident (#6778) was investigated in 1991 at the ABLE Manufacturing facility, and
\"cln_raleigh\data\aprojcctlncdot\nc0360.042\rcport\rq)ortl.doc\l3•Maf•97
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
R
D
u
I
I
•
I
I
I
2-2
vicinity, located approximately 250 feet east of the REA Construction Company former asphalt
laboratory testing building. Data collected in 1989 and_ 1990 by the North Carolina Department
of Health and Human Resources (NCDHHR), NCDEHNR Superfund Section, and DWQ
indicated a presence of target chlorinated solvents within the ABLE Manufacturing production
well and the adjacent former Halliburton Industries production well. These findings resulted in a
Phase II soil and groundwater investigation by Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. in 1991. The
Phase II Investigation reported that the highest target chlorinated solvents were just downgradient
of the ABLE Manufacturing Facility; however, target chlorinated solvents were also detected in
wells upgradient of the ABLE facility. In 1992, NCDEHNR Division of Solid Waste
Management reported to ABLE Manufacturing that the results ofTrigon's Phase II Investigation
inconclusively identified the source of contamination. In addition, the State Superfund Section
did not consider ABLE Manufacturing a responsible party. ABLE Manufacturing was not added
to the inventory of Federal Superfund sites or the inventory of sites in the North Carolina Inactive
Sites Program.
In 1992, the DWQ Groundwater Section investigated soils and groundwater in the vicinity
of the ABLE Manufacturing Facility. Several NCDEHNR shallow ·and deep monitor wells were
installed and sampled. While a confirmed point source of the contamination was not identified,
the highest reported halogenated compounds were once again identified in wells at the ABLE
Manufacturing Facility. In January 1993, DWQ requested that Pollution Incident #6778 be
placed on the North Carolina Superfund Section clean-up list. No additional information was
available, however, at the state Superfund Section.
Soil and groundwater concentration maps apparently prepared by NCDEHNR for wells
sampled during the investigation of Pollution Incident #6778 were discovered while researching
the state's files. The maps include analytical results for the groundwater and soil borings from
three NCDEHNR monitor wells (138019, 138020, and 138022). The date of sample collection
and the method of analysis are unknown for these data. It is assumed that the NCDEHNR sample
collection date was during 1992, based on NCDEHNR correspondence (dated in 1992), which
indicates that NCDEHNR wells were installed and sampled during that year. Tables 2-1 and 2-2
summarize these analytical results. An additional relevant finding from the investigations of
1:\aproject\ncdotl.nc0360.042'R:poo\rcporl2.doc:\13-May•97
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
u
m
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2-3
Pollution Incident #6778 is that the apparent groundwater hydraulic gradient is generally in a
south-southwest direction.
A Combined Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection Report for the Greshams Lake
Industrial Park was submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEP A) in
October 1996 by the NCDEHNR, Division of Waste Management, Superfund Section (NC
· Superfund Section). The Site Inspection was conducted to supplement the analytical data from
the previous investigations and to detennine the possible source of the contamination. As part of
the inspection, the NC Superfund Section performed the f91lowing tasks: (1) reviewed previous
reports and analytical data; (2) sampled downgradient potable water wells; (3) collected surface-
water and sediment samples from Greshams Lake; and (4)"conducted a potential receptors survey.
Analysis of surface-water samples did detect compounds above the laboratory reporting limits.
Total chromium was detected in two sediment samples collected from Greshams Lake. The water
sample collected from Charlie Brown's Catering Service potable well, located a quarter of a mile
from ABLE Manufacturing, contained trichloroethylene, which exceeded health-based
benchmarks. Review of the data indicates that a point source for the contamination was not
identified. A copy of the report is included in Appendix B.
According to the EDR Report, Greshams Lake Industrial Park and Rowland Lan_dfill,
3000 Gresham Lake Road, are listed as state hazardous waste sites. Rowland Landfill is also
listed as a solid waste facility/landfill site. Stay-Right, 3109 Gresham Lake Road, is listed as a
leaky underground storage tank (LUST) site. Soil contamination was discovered during tank
removal activities on September 28, 1993. Site No. 29, Billings and Garrett, Inc., and Weeks
Construction Company are listed with permanently closed USTs. The EDR report is included in
Appendix C.
GERAGHTY & MJLLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
•
E
I
I
D
I
n
D
n
u
3.0 SITE ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY
The pnmary objectives of the assessment were to better establish the vertical and
horizontal profile of target chlorinated solvents in the soils and groundwater in the vicinity of the
former asphalt testing laboratory. To achieve these objectives, Geraghty & Miller performed the
following field activities at the site from May through November 1996: (!) site reconnaissance,
including measurement of building dimensions and other site features to further refine the base site
map; (2) a soil-vapor-survey at 18 locations in the vicinity of the former asphalt testing laboratory
building; (3) soil sampling at 6 locations around the asphalt laboratory building using Geoprobe™;
(4) groundwater sampling at 2 on-site NCDEHNR monitor wells (J38019 and J38020); (5)
groundwater sampling at the on-site production well; ( 6) installation of a temporary piezometer at
the Geoprobe™ groundwater location (GW-1); (7) installation of 3 on-site Type II shallow
monitor wells; (8) water-level measurements at the on-site wells and selected NCDEHNR monitor
wells; and (9) surveyed top of casings at the 3 on-site monitor wells and selected NCDEHNR
monitor wells .
3.1 SOIL INVESTIGATION
3.1.1 Soil-Vapor Survey
On May 14, 1996, a soil-vapor survey was conducted at 18 points around the former
asphalt testing laboratory building. The primary objective of the soil-vapor survey was to locate
areas of elevated soil-vapor concentrations to assist in determining soil sampling locations. Figure
3-1 shows the soil-vapor sampling locations. The soil-vapor samples were collected at each
sampling point from a depth of2 to 4 feet below the land surface (ft bis) using the Microseeps™
portable soil-gas sampling system. The samples were collected directly from the sampling probe
in evacuated Tedlar™ bags. A Thermo Environmental Instruments, Inc. Model 580B portable
photoionization detector (PID) was used to screen the samples by connecting a tube from the
Tedlar™ bag to a connector on the PID. The Microseeps™ equipment and Tedlar™ sampl~ bag
were purged with ultra-high-purity (UHP) zero air between sample points.
\'&ffi _nlcigh\dal.a\aprojcctl.ncdot\nc036().042'ttport\rq)ort2doc\ I l-May-97
GERAGHTY & MlLLER. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• 'I
I
D
D
8
D
I
m
I
I
I
3-2
3.1.2 Direct Push Technology (DPTI Advancement
Soil samples were collected at six locations around the fonner asphalt testing laboratory
building on May 15 and May 17, 1996, to investigate the possible presence of soil-sorbed target
chlorinated solvents. The rationale for each soil sampling location is as follows:
• Sample SS-1 was collected in the area of SV-14 where elevated readings were
recorded;
• Sample SS-2 was collected in the area of SV-5 and adjacent to the area where the
chlorinated solvents were previously stored;
• Sample SS-3 was collected in the area of SV-11 where elevated readings were
recorded;
• Sample SS-4 was collected in the area of SV-13 and SV-17 where elevated readings
were recorded;
• Sample SS-5 was collected in the area of SV-7 adjacent to the fonner asphalt testing
laboratory building; and
• Sample SS-6 was collected in the area of SV-3 and adjacent to the area where the
chlorinated solvents were previously stored.
Figure 3-2 shows the soil sampling locations. Soil samples were collected usmg
Geoprobe™ direct push technology (DPT) following the Project QAP (Geraghty & Miller, 1996).
The Geoprobe™ sampling equipment was decontaminated prior to each sampling location and
subsequent depth interval in accordance with the Project QAP (Geraghty & Miller, 1996).
Sample collection was attempted at two depth intervals (0 to 5 ft bis and 5 to 10 ft bis).
Geoprobe™ refusal was encountered at several locations, limiting the total number of samples
that could be collected. At two of the six locations (SS-2 and SS-6), refusal prohibited the
collection of soil beyond 4 ft bis. At each depth interval, the acetate sleeve was removed from the
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
n
u
n
D
u
D
3-3
PID. One sample was collected from the portion along each interval yielding the highest soil-
vapor PID reading. A sample was collected at each depth interval, even if PID readings were
non-detect. Samples were collected in laboratory-provided, 4-ounce glass sample containers,
labeled, and placed in an insulated cooler on wet ice to preserve at or below 4°C. The samples
were shipped via overnight courier to Paradigm Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (Paradigm),
Wilmington, North Carolina, for analysis of target chlorinated solvents by USEP A SW-846
Method 8021.
3.2 GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT
3.2.l Temporary Piezometer Installation and Sampling
To investigate the possible presence of dissolved-phase target chlorinated solvents, to
determine the groundwater gradient, and to comply with the requirements of the April 1996 letter
of agreement between the NCDOT and DWQ, temporary piezometers were to be installed using
Geoprobe™ equipment at six locations around the former asphalt testing laboratory. On May 15,
1996, one temporary piezometer (GW-1) was installed using GeoprobeTM equipment
approximately 50 feet south of the southwest comer of the former asphalt testing laboratory
building (Figure 3-3). The piezometer was installed to a depth of approximately 30 ft bis, within
2 to 5 feet below the apparent water table. At six other locations, refusal prohibited the
installation of temporary piezometers. A sample was collected from temporary piezometer GW-1
using a clean disposable polyethylene bailer and clean nylon rope. The sample was collected in
laboratory-provided, 40 mL glass sample vials, labeled, and placed in an insulated cooler on wet
ice to preserve at or below 4°C. The sample containers were shipped via overnight courier to
Paradigm for analysis of target chlorinated solvents by Standard Method (SM) 6230D. Sample
containers, packaging, custody, and shipping protocol were followed in accordance the SOPs.
On May 17, 1996, four successive attempts to install temporary piezometers u·sing
Geo probe TM were unsuccessful due to refusal. At one of these locations, a Geo probe TM drive-
point with an expendable point was used as an alternative. The expendable drive-point was driven
to a depth of approximately 30 ft bis. Sample collection was attempted using flexible
\lp_ralcigh\data\aprojcct\ncdot\nc0360.042"«port\rq,orl2.doc\13-Mly-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. ft '1.J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
m
I_
D
u
D
0
D
g
g
I
3-4
polyethylene tubing and then a stainless steel mini-bailer; however, only a small volume of liquid
having a high solids content was recovered. Geo probe™ groundwater sampling/piezometer
installation efforts were, therefore, terminated.
3.2.2 NCDEHNR Well Sample Collection
On May 15, 1996, groundwater samples were collected at two NCDEHNR monitor wells
(138019 and 138020) using a decontaminated, 2-inch-diameter RediFlow® submersible electric
pump and polyethylene tubing. Figure 2-2 shows the location of these wells. The total depth of
the well 138019 was gauged in the field as 23.59 feet below north top-of-casing (n.t.o.c.). The
total depth (TD) of well 138020 is 89 feet n.t.o.c. with a screened interval from 77.5 to 87.5 ft
-below n.t.o.c. The RediFlow® pump and tubing were decontaminated in accordance with the
SOPs described in Section 3.0 of the Project QAP (Geraghty & Miller, 1996). A minimum of
three well volumes was purged from each of the wells prior to sampling. A total of five well
volumes, however, was purged from J38019 because the specific conductance, used as an
indicator parameter, had not stabilized. A Hydac Model 9 IO pH/temperature/conductivity m_eter
was utilized to measure indicator parameters during well purging. All meters were calibrated in
accordance with the SOPs described in Appendix A of the Project QAP. Purging and sampling
procedures were conducted in accordance with Sections 4 .2 and 4 .3, respectively, of the Project
QAP. Samples were collected in laboratory-provided, 40-milliliter (mL) glass sample vials, ,
labeled, and placed in an insulated cooler on wet ice to preserve at or below 4°C. The samples
were shipped via overnight courier to Paradigm for analysis of target chlorinated solvents by SM
6230D. Sample containers, packaging, custody, and shipping protocol were followed in
accordance with the Project QAP.
On September 30, 1996, groundwater samples were collected from NCDEHNR wells
138019, 138020, and 138022 using a decontaminated 2-inch-diameter Redi-Flow® submersible
electric pump and disposable polyethylene · tubing. The RediFlow® pump and tubing were
decontaminated in accordance with the SOPs described in Section 3.0 of the Project QAP. A
minimum of three well volumes was purged from each of the wells prior to sampling. A Hydac
Model 91 O pH/temperature/conductivity meter was utilized to measure indicator parameters
\~_raleigh\dau\aprojcct\ncdotw:0360.042\rq,ort'vcporl2.doc\l3-Mly·97
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
g
g
I
I
I
I
3-5
during well purgmg. All meters were calibrated in accordance with the SOPs described m
Appendix A of the Project QAP. Purging and sampling procedures were conducted m
accordance with Sections 4.2 and 4.3, respectively, of the Project QAP. Samples were collected
in laboratory-provided, 40-mL glass sample vials, labeled, and placed in_ an insulated cooler on
wet ice to preserve at or below 4°C. The samples were shipped via overnight courier to Paradigm
for analysis of target chlorinated solvents by USEPA SW-846 Method 8260B. Sample
containers, packaging, custody, and shipping protocol were followed in accordance with the
Project QAP.
3.2.3 Production Well Sample Collection
On May 17, 1996, the on-site production well (PW), located approximately 625 feet
northwest of the former asphalt testing laboratory, was sampled. The well is operational and is
utilized by REA Construction facility as "Gray Water" only. This well supplies all of the on-site
restrooms, sinks faucets, and spigots. It is also used for dust control and spray-down at the plant.
A "Do Not Drink-Non-Potable" sign is posted next to accessible spigots and faucets on the
property. The REA Construction Company also has recently been connected to the city water
supply system.
The first accessible spigot on the line from the well is located on the end of a small water-
holding tank outside of the pump house. The water within the tank was purged for approximately
10 minutes at maximum flow prior to sampling in accordance with Section 13.2 of the
NCDEHNR Division of Environmental Management (DWQ) "Groundwater Section Guidelines
For the Investigation and Remediation of Soils and Groundwater" (NCDEHNR, 1993). The' well
was purged and sampled at the end of the day, following a full day's worth of utilization, to obtain
a more representative sample. The sample was collected from the spigot at a low-flow rate to
minimize agitation and volatilization. The sample was collected in laboratory-provided, 40-mL
glass sample vials, labeled, and placed in an insulated cooler on wet ice to preserve at or below
4°C. The samples were shipped via overnight courier to Paradigm for analysis of target
chlorinated solvents by SM 6230D. Sample containers, packaging; custody, and shipping
protocol were followed in accordance with the Project QAP.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I! I
3-6
3.2.4 Monitor-Well Installation, Development, and Sampling
Geraghty & Miller installed three monitor wells, numbered 29MW-l through 29MW-3, at
the site on September 25 and 26, 1996. Well-construction details are listed in Table 3-2. Soil
boring logs and well-construction -diagrams are provided in Appendix D. Monitor-well locations
are shown on Figure 2-2. The rationale for each monitor-well location is as follows:
-• Monitor well 29MW-l was installed north-northeast of the former asphalt testing
laboratory to monitor any possible upgradient sources;
• Monitor well 29MW-2 was installed southwest of the former asphalt testing laboratory
to detennine the downgradient extent of the dissolved target chlorinated solvents
plume; and
• Monitor well 29MW-3 was installed southwest of the septic tank and drainfield and
south of the former asphalt testing laboratory to I) monitor if the septic system may
contribute as a secondary source and 2) detennine the downgradient extent of. the
dissolved target chlorinated solvents plume.
The monitor wells were also installed to assess hydrogeologic conditions and water quality
in. the water-table aquifer. Each well was constructed of 2-inch inner diameter (ID) schedule 40
I
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) solid casing and factory-slotted well screen (0.010-inch slots) connected
'
by threaded, flush joints. The wells were completed with a sufficient length of well screen so that
the screened interval intersected the static depth of the water table. The screen of each well is
equipped with a PVC bottom cap. The solid PVC casing of each well extends from the top of the
well screen to approximately 6 inches below grade. The annular space of each well is packed with
washed sand to a minimum level of 2 feet above the top of the well screen. A 2-foot-thick
bentonite seal rests on top of the sand pack, above which a cement grout extends to within
approximately 4 inches below the top of casing. The PVC casing of each well is equipped wtth a
sealed, locking cap to prevent unauthorized access. In addition, each well casing is protected
with a steel, water-tight manhole set to grade within a concrete pad. The monitor wells were
developed using disposable submersible 2-inch PVC pumps.
\\affl_nleip!,\dm.\aprojcct'w:dot'-lw:0360.042'n:port~.doc\13--M.y-97
GERAGHTY fl ~ULLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3-7
The wells were purged and sampled for target chlorinated solvents by USEP A Methods
60 I and 602. The monitor wells were purged using a submersible 2-inch stainless steel pump.
The pump was decontaminated prior to and between wells according to the procedures outlined in
the Project QAP. Prior to groundwater sample collection, a minimum of three to five well
volumes were purged from each well until relatively sediment-free water was obtained and
measurements of pH, conductivity, and temperature had stabilized.
Groundwater samples were immediately placed in insulated coolers containing ice and
were shipped by overnight courier to Paradigm for analyses of target chlorinated solvents by
USEPA Methods 601 and 602.
3.2.5 Slug Testing
In-situ hydraulic conductivity tests (slug tests) were performed on monitor wells 29MW-l,
29MW-2, and 29MW-3 on November 11, 1996, to determine an average hydraulic conductivity
for the uppermost water-bearing zone at the site. Rising head and falling head slug tests were
conducted using a pressure transducer. The transducer was connected to an In-Situ, Inc.
Hermit TM data logger, which was programmed to record water-level measurements at logarithmic
intervals. A solid cylinder (slug) of known volume was lowered into the test well, creating an
instantaneous, positive change in the water level. The rate at which the water level returned to
static conditions was recorded as test I (slug-in data). Once the water level recovered, test I was
stopped. The data logger was then programmed to begin recording data for .test 2. The data
logger was activated, and the slug was immediately removed from the well, creating an
instantaneous, negative change in the water level. · The water-level recovery rate also was
recorded (slug-out data). The transducer was removed from the well. The transducer and cable
were decontaminated with a soapy water solution and rinsed before and after each well test. The
data collected during the slug tests were downloaded from the data logger and analyzed using
AQTESOLV™, a computer software program developed by Geraghty & Miller, and the Bouwer
and Rice method to determine the hydraulic properties of the uppermost bedrock aquifer.
\'&m_raleigh\aala\aprojectlJlcdot\nc03ti0.04heport\n:port2.doc\lJ.May-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3-8
3.2.6 Well Surveying
A water-level measuring point (top of casing) was established at each monitor well. The
horizontal position and elevations, relative to an assumed site datum of I, 000 feet, of the
measuring point for monitor wells 29MW-l through _29MW-3 and select NCDEHNR monitor
wells were surveyed by Piedmont Olsen Hensley.
3.3' SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
A sample identification system was developed to enable the field personnel to establish
'
unique and appropriate identifications for each sample collected. This system incorporates
identifiers for the sample matrix, the sample location, and the sample number. The identification
system has been designed to give reference to previously-existing sample location identification
numbers. The identification number consists of the site identification, sample matrix and location
code, and sample number. For soil borings, the sample matrix and location code was followed by
the depth interval sampled in ft bis. Field replicates and equipment blanks were designated with
"REP" and "EB," respectively, followed by the sample matrix codes.
The following are provided as examples to illustrate the use of the system for groundwater
and soil samples:
Shallow Monitor-Well Groundwater Samples:
NCDEHNR Monitor-Well Groundwater Samples:
Production Well Groundwater Samples:
Geoprobe™ Groundwater Samples:
Soil Samples:
Field QC Samples:
Equipment Blanks:
Trip Blanks:
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
29MW-#
J38019;J38020;J38022
PW
GW-#
SS-#
EB-#-GW; EB-#MW
EB-#-SS
TB-#-(Date)
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Replicates: REP-#-GW; REP-#-MW
REP-#-SS
3.4 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY AND TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURES
3-9
The field personnel were responsible for the care and custody of the sample collected until
the samples were properly and formally transferred to another person or facility. To simplify the
chain-of-custody record, as few people as possible handled the sample or physical evidence during
the investigation or inspection. All field documentation was completed using waterproof,
indelible ink on either Geraghty & Miller pre-printed forms or in bound field logbooks. A chain-
of-custody form was completed for all samples or physical evidence collected.
\'cm_ ra.lcigh\data\aprojcct\ncdot\nc:0360.042\repon\rcpffl2.doc\l 3-May-97
GERAGHTY & MlLLER. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETIING AND POTENTIAL RECEPTORS
A discussion of adjacent property uses, topography, surface-water drainage,
hydrogeology, and potential receptors is provided in the following subsections.
4.1 ADJACENT PROPERTY USES
The REA Construction facility is located 1,000 feet to the north of Greshams Lake in the
Greshams Lake Industrial Park. The site property consists of approximately 10 acres in Wake
County in an industrial/undeveloped land area bordered by CSX Railroad and Greshams Lake to
the south. A undeveloped parcel of land, ABLE Manufacturing, Northside Drive, and the former
Halliburton site are east of the site.
4.2 TOPOGRAPHY AND SURFACE-WATER DRAINAGE
The site is depicted on the Raleigh East and Wake Forest quadrangles (Figure 2-1).
Topography in the immediate area is characterized as relatively flat and sloping gently to the
southeast. The elevation at the site ranges from 280 to 300 feet above mean sea level (ft ms!).
Surface drainage in the site is generally from north to south in the abs.ence of a formal drainage
ditch system (refer to Figure 2-1 ).
4.3 HYDROGEOLOGY
Information on the regional and site-specific hydrogeology is provided in the following
paragraphs.
4.3.1 Regional Geologyffiydrogeology
Wake County lies primarily within the Piedmont physiographic province, with the
exception of a small area in the southern portion of the county that lies within the Coastal Plain
Province. About half the county consists of flat uplands that are remnants of the last Mesozoic to
early Cenozoic Piedmont peneplain, thinly covered in most places with sediment. The remainder
of the area includes valley sides and bottoms of the incised stream system. Two major stream
\\wn_nlcigh\dala\aproject\ncdotw:0360.042\reportlreportl.doc\lJ..May-97
GERAGHTY & MlLLER. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4-2
systems provide surface drainage for Wake County. The Neuse River Basin drains most of the
county. The Cape Fear River Basin drains a small portion of the southwestern county.
Bedrock in Wake County consists of metamorphic, igneous, and sedimentary rocks
ranging in age from late Precambrian to recent. Metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks of the
Raleigh Belt extend northeastward through the middle of the county and also underlie its
southwestern and eastern edges. The eastern half of the county is underlain by granitic Rolesville
Batholith of probable mid-Paleozoic age. Triassic sedimentary rocks (Newark Group) in the
block-faulted Durham basin underlie the western quarter of the county. These coarse-grained to
conglomeratic-clastic sediments are separated from metamorphic rocks to the east by the west-
dipping Jonesboro normal fault.
Several major features dominate the bedrock structure of Wake County. East of the
Jonesboro fault, Raleigh Belt metamorphic rocks have an overall westward dip, although a major
asymmetrical anticline extends northward through west Raleigh. Metamorphic rocks on the west
limb of this anticline dip generally westward. To the east, Raleigh Belt rocks are isoclinally folded
and generally dip vertically or at high angles to the east or west. Minor folding may be common
locally, especially near the contact with the Rolesville Batholith. Strike of bedding, cleavage, and
foliation is generally north-northeastward, but may strike northward or eastward and may
crosscut all rock types up to and including Newark-age rocks (Parker, I 979).
Coastal Plain sediment covers wide areas in the east and southeast of the county, lying
unconformably on deeply eroded metamorphic, igneous, and Newark sedimentary rocks. Uplands
farther west and north across the county have strips and patches of similar sediment, remnants of
a surface that was probably a continuous plain in the late Mesozoic or early Cenozoic. Sediment
thickness here ranges from O to 80 feet (Parker, 1979).
In igneous and metamorphic rocks, such as granite, schist, and gneiss which underlie the
site, groundwater occurs primarily in secondary porosity (e.g., fractures and joints). Areas with a
high frequency of fractures and joints have higher hydraulic conductivities and are subject to more
mechanical and chemical weathering processes. These processes break down the parent rock into
residual soils and saprolite. Therefore, areas with a thick mantle of saprolite may be an indication
\'cm_ralei&h\data\ap'Oject\ncdot'nd>360.042"q,on\repm2.doc\13-May•97
GERAGHTY f..? MILLER. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4-3
that underlying rock has joints, fractures, and pores which contain groundwater. Thus, in
Piedmont rock types, wells near streams or valleys typically exhibit higher yields than wells in
topographically high areas.
4.3.2 Site-Specific Geology
Soils in the vicinity of the site, as described in the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina, belong to the Cecil-Appling Association. This association is characterized as gently
sloping to steep, deep, well drained soils that have a subsoil of firm clay loam to clay; derived
mostly from weathered granite, gneiss, and schist.
The characteristics of the subsurface materials beneath the site were evaluated from
information obtained during the installation of monitor wells 29MW-1 through 29MW-3. Based
on the boring logs, the subsurface material beneath the site generally consists of approximately 5
to 8 feet of fill material (sand and gravel) underlain by silty clay to approximately 20 ft bis. The
silty clay unit overlies and grades to a silty sand approximately 20 ft bis.
4.4 GROUNDWATER FLOW SYSTEM
The hydrogeologic parameters of the groundwater flow system are discussed in this
subsection.
4.4.1 Shallow Groundwater Flow Direction
Water-level measurement data were collected from each of the on-site monitor wells and
select NCDEHNR monitor wells on November 7, 1996 and are presented in Table 4-1. The
depth-to-water measurements and the water-level elevations are both listed on the table. The
water-level elevation data collected on November 7, I 996 were used to construct a shallow
aquifer -potentiometric surface contour map (Figure 4-1) and bedrock aquifer -potentiometric
surface contour map (Figure 4-2). The groundwater in the uppermost water-bearing zone flows
across the site in a southwest direction, as indicated in Figure 4-1. The groundwater in the deeper
water-bearing zone flows south across the site, as indicated in Figure 4-2.
\l.tffl_nlci;h\dala\aprojcct\ncdot-0360.04'h'eportlnport.2.doc\13-May-97
GERAGHTY C!i' MlLLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.4.2 Hydraulic Gradients
I
4-4
The average horizontal hydraulic gradient in the uppermost water-bearing zone is
approximately 0.013 feet per foot (ft/fl) near the former Halliburton site to 0.003 ft/fl at Site No.
29.
4.4.3 Hydraulic Properties
In-situ hydraulic conductivity test (slug test) results from monitor wells 29MW-1,
29MW-2, and 29MW-3 were used to obtain estimates of the hydraulic conductivity for the upper
portion of the shallow aquifer (Appendix E). Results obtained from well 29MW-3 were not used
in this analysis because the data obtained from the slug test are not considered reliable. Analysis
of the rising head slug-test data provided hydraulic conductivity values of8.13 x JO"' centimeters
per second (cm/sec) and 3.7 x 10"' cm/sec for monitor wells 29MW-1 and 29MW-2, respectively.
An average hydraulic conductivity value of 5.9 x 10"' cm/sec (or 1.67 ft/day) was calculated from
these values.
4.5 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS
A potential receptors survey was conducted by the NCDEHNR, Division of Waste
Management, Superfund Section. Potential receptors, as applied herein, are defined as features
such as water-supply wells, surface-water bodies, or basements that could be adversely affected
by the presence of the dissolved target chlorinated solvents detected at the site. A map depicting
the locations of the potential receptors is included in Appendix B.
• Land use surrounding the site is predominantly industriaVcommercial;
• Municipal water-supply wells are not located within 1,500 feet of the site;
• Surface-water intakes are not located within 0.5 mile of the site;
\\sffl_raleiah\dal.a\aproject\ncdot\nc0360.042wport\rcport2.doc\13-May-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4-5
• Seven private water-supply wells are located within 1,500 feet of the site. The ABLE
Manufacturing and the former Halliburton facilities, which are adjacent to the subject
site, have water supply wells that are not presently in use;
• The REA Construction Company has an on-site water supply well but the well is not
used for potable water;
• Gresharns Lake is located approximately 1,000 feet south of the site; and
• Basements were not observed on adjacent properties.
4.6 ROUTES OF MIGRATION
Humans can be exposed when they come in contact with groundwater, soil, surface water,
or ambient air that has been impacted by target chlorinated solvents. The major routes of
exposure are by inhalation, dermal absorption, and ingestion. In general, following a release to
I the subsurface, the greatest mass of target chlorinated solvents is present in the soil-adsorbed
phase. However, the most mobile phases are the vapor, dissolved, and liquid.
If concentrations of target chlorinated solvents existed at the site, Gresharns Lake could be
a possible route of migration and a possible exposure pathway for humans. However, actual
migration must be based on site characterization as documented in this report.
\'gm_ n.lcigh\data\aprojcct\ncdol\ncil360.042'1eport\report2.doc\13-Msy-97
GERAGHTY & MlLLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.0 DATA REVIEW AND VALIDATION
The purpose of. this section 1s to evaluate the laboratory analytical data for the
completeness of data package deliverables (Modified Level II reporting level). The soil,
groundwater and associated QC sample data were validated following the rules set forth in the
Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organic Analyses (USEP A, 1994) and the criteria presented
in the Quality Assurance Plan developed specifically for the NCDOT Asphalt Site Investigations
(Project QAP). Additionally, all field data were reviewed to verify the completion of requir~d
documentation. The Paradigm laboratory analytical data reports (Gl49-2, 3, 4, 5, and 42) are
presented in Appendix F.
5.1 FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE COMPONENTS
All field activities were appropriately documented on water and soil sampling logs. The
Geoprobe™ soil, Geoprobe™ groundwater, and monitor well groundwater, and associated QC
samples were collected on May 15 and 17, 1996. Groundwater and associated QC samples also
were collected on September 30, 1996. All samples were appropriately labeled, stored in sample
containers on ice at 4 °C, and shipped via overnight courier to Paradigm for analyses. Chain-of-
custody fonns were forwarded with the samples and custody seals were affixed to the coolers
prior to shipment to Paradigm.
Trip blank samples TB-01-(5/15/96) and TB-02-(5/17/96) and equipment rinsate blank
sample EB-01-SS were included in the soil sampling program conducted in May 1996 and
analyzed for target chlorinated solvents using USEPA SW-846 Method 8021. Trip blank samples
TB-01-(5/15/96) and TB-02-(5/17/96) and equipment rinsate blank samples EB-01-MW and EB-
O 1-GW were associated with the groundwater samples collected in May 1996 and analyzed for
target chlorinated solvents by SM 6230D. Sample EB-01-MW was prepared using the
decontaminated 2-inch submersible pump used to sample monitor-wells 138019 and 138020,
whereas sample EB-01-GW was associated with Geoprobe™ sample GW-1. The two field
duplicate samples REP-01-SS (SS-2-4) and REP-01-MW (138020) were collected to assess field
\'4Jrn_ralcigh\aala\ap-ojcct\ncdol\nc0l60.042\rcporl\rcporl.2.doc\l3-May•97
GERAGHTY & MlLLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
•
5-2
and ·analytical precision. Additionally, samples SS-6-10 and 138019 were designated in the field
for matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) analysis.
Trip blank sample TB-01-(9/30/96) and equipment rinsate blank sample EB-01-GW were
-
associated with the groundwater samples collected on September 30, 1996 and analyzed for
target chlorinated solvents by USEPA SW-846 Method 8260B. Field duplicate sample REP-01-
GW (29MW-1) was collected to assess field and analytical precision. Additionally, sample
J3 SQ 19 was designated in the field for MS/MSD analysis.
5.2 LABO RA TORY QUALITY ASSURANCE COMPONENTS
All soil, groundwater, and associated quality control (QC) samples collected were
received in good condition and were analyzed for target chlorinated solvents by Paradigm
'
(Reports No. Gl49-2, 3, 4, 5, and 42; Appendix F) within the required 14-day holding time.
Deviations from QC Standards are discussed below. With the exception of the deviations .
reported herein, all sample QC parameters were within established control limits. The attached
data are useable within the confines of this review.
5.2.1 Target Chlorinated Solvents for Geoprobe,... Soils {USEPA SW-846 Method 8021)
The required quantitation limits were detected and adjusted for sample moisture content
(solid samples). Target chlorinated solvents were not detected in the associated method blank
samples (VBLK052996, VBLK060496 and VBLK061096 [solids]; VBLK052196 and
VBLK053096 [water]), trip blank samples (TB-01-(5-15-96] and TB-02 [5-17-96]), and
equipment rinsate blank sample EB-01-SS.
The surrogate recoveries and MS/MSD (sample SS-5-10) recoveries and relative percent
differences (RPDs) were within established QC limits with the exception of tetrachloroethene,
which had MS/MSD (43/43%) recoveries below the QC limits (44-156%). The target chlorinated
solvent sample data, however, were not qualified based on the advisory MS/MSD recovery QC
sample data.
\\gm_ralcigh\dua'-f)roject\ncdol\nc:0360.047'ffporlvcport2.doc\l3-May-97
GERAGHTY cl MlLLER, INC. ft \,J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5-3
The duplicate sample criteria were met for QC soil sample REP-01-SS and associated
sample SS-4-10. No data qualification, therefore, was required.
5.2.2 Target Chlorinated Solvents for Geoproben< and NCDEHNR Monitor Wells
Groundwater (SM 6230D)
The required quantitation limits were detected, with the exception of Geoprobe™
groundwater sample GW-1, which was diluted 1:2 due to elevated target chlorinated solvent
concentrations (Hall side). This dilution resulted in a two-fold.increase in the quantitation limits
for the compounds in this fraction. The PID side sample data for GW-1, however, did not require
sample dilution.
Several compounds were detected in QC sample EB-0 I-MW: tert-butylbenzene (0.6
µg/L); ethylbenzene (1.0 µg/L); isopropylbenzene (0.7 µg/L); methylene chloride (1.0 µg/L);
styrene (1 µg/L); 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (1 µg/L); and vinyl chloride (0.5 µg/L). Because the
vinyl chloride data for associated groundwater samples J3 8020 (2 µg/L) and REP-01-MW ( 1
µg/L) did not exceed five times the concentration detected in sample EB-01-MW, these sample
data are qualified as undetected (<). The sample results for all other compounds detected in EB-
O 1-MW were undetected and were not qualified.
Ethylbenzene (0.7 µg/L) and methylene chloride (2 µg/L) were detected in field QC blank
sample EB-01-GW. The methylene cliloride concentration detected in associated sample GW-1
did not exceed ten times the level detected in EB-01-GW and was qualified as undetected (<).
Ethylbenzene, however, was not detected in sample GW-1.
Target chlorinated solvents were not detected in QC blank samples TB-01-(5/15/96), TB-
02-(5/17/96), VBLK052296, and VBLK052396.
The surrogate recoveries and MS/MSD (sample J38019) recoveries and RPDs were
within established QC limits with the exception of the MS/MSD recoveries for chloromethane
(70/50%) and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (130%) and the MS/MSD RPDs for carbon
tetrachloride (32%), chloromethane (34%), and cis-1,2-dichlorethene (38%). All Laboratory
Control Sample (LCS) recoveries, however, were within QC limits. The target chlorinated
\\p_ralci;h\aata\aprojcctlncdot\nc:0360.042«port\zq,on1.doc\lJ.May-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5-4
solvent sample data were not qualified based on the MS/MSD recovery and RPD advisory QC
sample data.
The initial calibration data for batches 052196 (REP-01-MW and PW) and 052396
(138017, 138018, and GW-1) were within the established QC limits for relative response factor
(RRF>0.05). However, the relative standard deviation (¾RSD) associated with these data had
bromoform (30.04%), n-butylbenzene (32.58%), sec-butylbenzene (35.11%), tert-butylbenzene
(32.53%), and 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene (30.65%) for batch 052196 and bromoform (59.62%) and
bromomethane (50.29"/o) for batch 052396 were outside the RSD control limit (>30%). The
detected n-butylbenzene, sec-butylbenzene, and tert-butylbenzene concentrations for sample PW
(batch 052196), therefore, were qualified as estimated and flagged "J."
The continuing calibration data for batches 052296 (REP-01-MW and PW) and 052396,
(138017, 138018 and GW-1), associated with initial calibration batches 052196 and 052396,
respectively, were within established QC limits for RRF (>0.05). The percent difference (% D)
associated with these data, however, had bromoform (-26.9%), bromomethane (-33.7%),
chloromethane (34.9%), and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (-54.3%) for batch 052296 and
bromomethane (-60.0%); chloroethane (-25.8%); 2-chlorotoluene (-51.1%); 1,2-dibromo-3-
chloropropane (-53.4%); and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene for batch 052396 were outside the %D
control limit (> 25%). The data for these compounds in the associated samples, therefore, were
qualified as estimated and flagged "f' if detected and "<f' if non-detected.
The duplicate sample criteria were met for QC groundwater sample REP-01-MW and
associated sample J3 8020 with the exception of dichlorodifluoromethane, I, 1-dichloroethane; cis-
1,2-dichloroethene; methyl-tert butyl ether; tetrachloroethene; ICE; trichlorofluoromethane; and
vinyl chloride. The data for these compounds for samples 138020 and REP-01-MW, therefore,
were qualified as estimated and flagged "f' if detected and "<f' if non-detected.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.3 Target Chlorinated Solvents For Monitor-Well Groundwater (USEPA SW-846
Method 8260B)
5-5
The required quantitations were detected with the exception of groundwater sample
29MW-3, which was diluted I: 12.5 due to elevated compound concentrations. This dilution
resulted in a 12.5-fold increase in the quantitation limits for sample 29MW-3.
Target chlorinated solvents were not detected in the associated field and laboratory QC
samples TB-01-(9/30/96), EB-01-GW, VBLK100496 (29MW-l; 29MW-2, J38Q19,
REP-01-GW, TB-01-(9/30/96], and EB-01-GW), VBLK101096 (J38Q20 and J 38Q21), and
VBLKl0l 196 (29MW-3).
The surrogate recoveries and MS/MSD (sample J38Ql9) recoveries and RPDs were
within established QC limits, with the exception ofbromoform (MS 75.7%); 2-chloroethyl vinyl
ether (0/0%); dibromochloromethane (MS 78.3%); 1,2-dibromomethane (MS 82.3%);
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene (MS 68.6%); 1, 1,2-trichloroethane (MS 79.5%); and vinyl acetate (MS
86.3%) which had MS/MSD recoveries below the lower QC limits. All LCS (LCS101196)
recoveries, however, were within control limits. The groundwater sample data were not qualified
based on the MS/MSD recovery advisory QC sample data.
The duplicate sample criteria were met for QC groundwater sample REP-01-GW and
associated sample 29MW-l.
5.4 OVERALL DATA ASSESSMENT
The target chlorinated solvent analytical data included in Paradigm Reports No. G 149-2,
3, 4, 5, and 42 were validated according to the criteria presented in Section 5.0 and are valid.
Estimated (J) data qualifiers, however, were assigned to the Geoprobe™ and NCDEHNR
monitor-well groundwater sample data because initial and continuing calibration and field
duplicate sample criteria were not met. Additionally, several compounds detected in groundwater
and QC samples J38020 and REP-01-MW (vinyl chloride} and GW-1 (methylene chloride) were
qualified as non-detected ( <) due to the presence of these compounds in the associated field QC
equipment blank samples EB-01-GW (methylene chloride) and EB-01-MW (vinyl chloride).
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.0 RESULTS AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
The principal. findings from the soil sampling and groundwater monitoring programs are
summarized below. A brief discussion of the significant hydrogeologic features is also provided.
6.1 SOIL INVESTIGATION RESULTS
Soil-vapor concentrations were recorded at locations adjacent to the walls of the former
asp half testing laboratory building. Readings ranged from O ppm collected adjacent to the walls
of the new laboratory to l 06 ppm collected adjacent to the facility's natural gas valving. Soil-
vapor concentrations ranging from 0.0 ppm to 106 ppm were recorded at locations adjacent to t~e
walls of the former asphalt testing laboratory building. The recorded concentrations are ionizable
organics within the range of O to 10.7 electrovolts (eV) of the PID that Geraghty & Miller is
inte~reting as both target and non-target chlorinated solvents. Any recorded concentration
above background (0.0 ppm) indicates the possible presence of target chlorinated solvents within
that area. An odor similar to sulfur-based mercaptans was noticeable in the area, which could
indicate a small gas leak or bleed-off at the valves. Methane gas should not, however, interfere
with the reading of the PID.
: Soil sampling locations were placed adjacent to each wall of the former asphalt testing
laboratory building. Soil sampling locations SS-1, SS-3, and SS-4 were selected based on results of
the soil-vapor survey. Table 6-1 is a summary of soil analytical data for Geoprobe™ soil samples
analyzed for target chlorinated solvents by USEPA SW-846 Method 8021. Sample results are shown
on .a dry weight basis. A negligible concentration of 1,1,1-TCA (91.9 micrograms per kilogram
[µg/kg]) was detected in SS-5-10. 1,1,1-TCA was not detected in any other sample above the
quantitation limit. The DWQ soil cleanup level for 1,1,1-TCA is approximately 8,150 µg/kg, based on
a calculated value using the Organic Leachate Model as presented in Section 7.0, Table 4 of the
"Groundwater Section Guidelines for the Investigation and Remediation of Soils and Groundwater"
(NCDEHNR, 1993). A summary of acceptable soil concentrations for target chlorinated solvents
has been tabulated and is included in Appendix A. Based on this calculated soil cleanup level, the
g:\aprojcct\ncdot\nc:0360.04Z'Rport'"J)ort2.doc\l3-Mly-97
GERAGHTY & MlLLER, INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6-2
1, 1, 1-TCA found in the soil is within acceptable limits. Other compounds were not reported above the
quantitation limit in any sample.
Soil samples were collected from Oto 4 ft bis and 6 to 10 ft bis in soil borings SS-1, SS-3,
SS-4, and SS-5. Soil samples were collected from 0 to 4 ft bis in soil borings SS-2 and SS-6.
Based on the results of the soil-vapor and soil DPT investigations, soil-sorbed target chlorinated
solvents were not detected in the vicinity of the former asphalt testing laboratory.
6.2 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION RESULTS
Target chlorinated solvents detected in the groundwater samples collected on May 15 and
17, 1996 above the North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Subchapter 2L (15A NCAC
2L) Groundwater Quality Standards include TCE at 138019 ( 4 µg/L) and 13 8020 ( 4J µg/L) and
1, 1,-dichloroethene at GW-1 (8 µg/L ). Non-target chlorinated solvents includi
0
ng
tetiachloroethene (PCE) and petroleum-based compounds were detected in excess of the
l SA NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standards in the groundwater samples collected at
temporary piezometer GW-1, the NCDEHNR monitor wells 138019 and 138020, and Site No. 29
production well (PW). The May 1996 analytical data are summarized in Table 6-2. Reported
concentrations that exceed the l SA NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standards are highlighted ;by
an enclosed box. If a numerical l SA NCAC 2L Standard has not been established for a
compound, detectable concentrations of the compound in a groundwater sample are considered to
be in excess of the North Carolina Water Quality Standards.
TCE (6 µg/L) was detected in the groundwater sample collected from well 29MW-2;
1, 1-dichloroethene ( 44 µg/L) was detected in the groundwater sampled collected from well
29MW-3; chloroform (1 µg/L) was detected in the groundwater sample collected from well
29MW-l; and vinyl chloride was detected in the groundwater sample collected from 138022
(9 µg/L) above the l SA NCAC 2L Standards during the September 30, 1996, sampling event.
Other target chlorinated solvents were detected below the l SA NCAC 2L Standards during this
sampling event, including 1,1-dichloroethene at 29MW-2, 1,1,1-TCA at 29MW-2 and 29MW-3,
and cis-1,2-dichloroethane at 138020 and 138022. Non-target chlorinated solvents including
acl,proj«tln<dotln<0300.042"q,ortvcpo,tl.do<\Il-M,y-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6-3
petroleum-based compounds were detected in wells J38019, J38020, and 138022. The September
analytical data are summarized on Table 6-3.
6.3 SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS
The following conclusions are drawn from the soil and groundwater investigations:
(I) Previous site activities included the testing of asphalt using one or more of the
target chlorinated solvents: carbon tetrachloride, TCE, or 1, I, 1-TCA.
(2) NCDEHNR conducted a soil and groundwater investigation at the adjacent ABLE
manufacturing facility. The investigation and subsequent investigations detected
the presence of dissolved target chlorinated solvents in the groundwater in the
vicinity of the ABLE manufacturing facility. However, the source of the
contamination was never identified. The dissolved target chlorinated solverits
detected at the ABLE manufacturing facility are similar to the dissolved target
chlorinated solvents detected in the samples collected from the monitor wells at the
downgradient REA Construction Company site (Site No. 29).
(3) The NCDEHNR Superfund Section has prepared a Combined Preliminary
Assessment/Site Inspection Report for the Greshams Lake Industrial Park. The
report summarized all previous reports and presented the findings from the
surface-water and sediment sampling, water supply well sampling, and the
potential receptors survey. Dissolved TCE was detected in a potable water well
located approximately a quarter of a mile from ABLE Manufacturing. Surface-
water samples of nearby streams and Greshams Lake did not detect any dissolved
target chlorinated solvents. A point source for the contamination was not
identified.
( 4) Land surface in the site area slopes to the west-southeast.
1:\aprojc:ct\ncdot\nc0l60.042'vcport\zq)or\l.doc\lJ..May-fJ'1
GERAGHTY & MJLLER, INC. C,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6-4
(5) Water is supplied to the facility by the City of Raleigh. A water supply well is used
on site for "Gray Water" only. Water from the restrooms at the former laboratory
discharge to a septic tank/drainfield.
( 6) Soil-vapor sampling points were strategically placed around the former asphalt
testing building to determine the locations of elevated soil-vapor concentrations to
aid in the placement of the soil sampling locations. Soil-vapor concentrations
ranging from 0.0 ppm to 106 ppm were recorded at locations adjacent to the walls
of the former asphalt testing laboratory building. The recorded concentrations are
ionizable organics within the range of0 to 10.7 electrovolts (eV) of the PID that
Geraghty & Miller is interpreting as both target and non-target chlorinated
solvents. Any recorded concentration above background (0.0 ppm) indicates the
possible presence of target chlorinated solvents within that area.
(7) Geoprobe™ soil samples were generally obtained from areas of elevated soil-vapor
readings to determine the presence or absence of soil-adsorbed target chlorinated
solvents. 1, 1, 1-TCA was detected in one of the collected Geo probe™ soil
samples. However, the concentration was well below the calculated soil clean-up
value.
(8) The results from the groundwater investigation indicate that shallow groundwater
is present beneath the site at depths ranging from 25 to 26 ft bis. The overall
direction of groundwater flow is to the south-southeast at an estimated hydraulic
gradient of0.013 ft/ft near the former Halliburton site to 0.003 ft/ft at Site No. 29.
(9) Groundwater analytical results from the investigation identified the presence of
chloroform (I µg/L-29MW-1), 1,1-dichloroethene (44 µg/L -29MW-3), TCE (6
µg/L-29MW-2), and vinyl chloride (9 µg/L-138022) above the state 15A NCAC
2L Groundwater Quality Standards.
g:\apfojectw:dotw:0360.042\rcpcwt«part2.doc\13-May-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6-5
6.4 'CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions are drawn from the soil and groundwater-investigations:
(1) 1,1,1-TCA was detected in one soil sample at the site. However, the soil
concentration is below the calculated soil clean-up levels.
(2) Target chlorinated solvents were detected in the groundwater samples obtained from
the site monitor wells and in upgradient NCDEHNR wells in excess of the 15A NCAC
2L Standards.
(3) During previous NCDEHNR investigations, laboratory analysis of groundwater
samples collected from wells upgradient of the subject site detected dissolved target
chlorinated solvents in excess of the 15A NCAC 2L standards.
( 4) An unknown amount _of target chlorinated solvents was released to the soil and may
have impacted groundwater at the site. The relatively low concentrations of target
chlorinated solvents downgradient of the former asphalt testing laboratory may be
explained by off site sources as well as the asphalt testing source. Numerous
investigations from 1989 to the present by NCDHHR, NCDEHNR, and Trigon have
documented a release upgradient at the Greshams Lake Industrial Park. The septic
system may be a secondary source of dissolved target chlorinated solvents at the site
since it receives water from the impacted production well.
6.5 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the data presented m this report, target chlorinated solvents have been
adequately defined in the subsurface soil; however, the extent of the dissolved target chlorinated
solvent plume has not been delineated at the site. Monitor wells upgradient of the site have been
impacted by dissolved chlorinated solvents, and the source of the upgradient contamination has
not been determined. Until the upgradient source has been defined and delineated, no further
action with regard to Site No. 29 is recommended.
a,lopojcot"""°''ml360.04"'-'vqml.do<IIJ.M,y-'n
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. C,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7.0 REFERENCES
Geraghty & Miller, Inc., 1988. Quality Assurance Manual.
Geraghty & Miller, Inc., 1996. Asphalt Materials Manufacturing Facility Site Investigation
· Project Quality Assurance Plan. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Department of Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR), 1993. Groundwater
Section Guidelines of the Investigation and Remediation of Soils and Groundwater.
March.
North Carolina Geological Survey (NCGS), 1985. Geologic Map ofNorth Carolina. Department
of Natural Resources & Community Development.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1991. Environmental Compliance Branch
Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual (SOP/QAM). Region IV,
Environmental Services Division, Athens, GA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1994. USEPA Contract Laboratory Program -
National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review. Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response. EP A/540/R/94/090. December.
1',pn_ru'"lf,1<1mlopojm...iotlno0360.D42'<q,on..,,..Udo<l13-May-97
GERAGHTY & MlLLER, INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLES
g;lop,oj«t\ncdot\nal360.0411,q,ort'<qx,t2."°'ll3-M,y-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. C,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 2-l. Swnmary of Grow,dwater Analytical Data for NCDEHNR Wells Sampled during Investigation of Pollution
Incident #6TI8, Sile No. 29,'REA Construction Company, Raleigh, North Carolina.
NCAC2L Sample ID: 138019 138020 138022
Grow,dwater Lab ID: Unknown Unknown Unknown
Constituents Standard Dale Sampled: 1992' 1992' 1992'
Volatile Organics µg/L
1, 1-Dichloroethane 700 3.4
1,1-Dichloroethene 7 1
ci1-l,l-Dichloroetbene 70 1.3 1.3 1.3
Tetrachlorothene 0.7 5E trace trace
Trichloroetbene 2.8 3.6 3.6
1, 1, I-Trichloroethane 200 1
Micrograms per liter. µg/L
NCAC2L
NS
North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Chapter 2L, Grow,dwater Quality Standards, February 8, 1994.
Nwnerical 15A NCAC 2L Standard has not been established; therefore, detectable concentrations of these
~---substances in grow,dwater are considered to be in excess of North Carolina Water Quality Standards.
.,! _-'--_...,!Constituent concentration exceeds the 15A NCAC 2L Standard.
• Analytical method is unknown. Date: of sample collection is unknown but assumed to be in 1992.
No analytical data are available for this constituent.
g:\aprojcct\ncdol\nc0360.04l\tables\GW6m.XLS 5/13/97 GERAGHTY & MJLLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 2-2. Summa,y of Soil Analytical Data Sampled during NCDEHNR Well Installation for Investigation of
Pollution Incident #6778, Site No. 29, REA Construction Company, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Constituents
Volatile Organics µg/lcg
cis-1,l-Dichloroethene
Trichloroelhene
p-Jsopropyl Toluene
T ett-Butyl Benzene
Sample ID:
Lab ID:
Date Sampled:
µg/lcg Micrograms per kilogram.
138019
Unkno..,,
1992•
1.81
1.81
138020
Unknown
1992'
37'
Trace3
138022
Unknown
1992'
Analytical method is unknown. Date of sample collection is unknown but assumed to be in I 992.
No analytical data are available for this constituent
Sampling depth of 23 feet below land surface.
Sampling depth of 3 feel to 8 feet below land surface.
Sampling depth ofl8 feet to 33 feel below land surface.
slopn>i"'""""'""°,.,,042\ub'"'"56mXLS s/llm GERAGHTY & MlLLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3-1. Summary of Soil-Vapor Survey Data for Site No. 29, Sampled on May 14, 1996, REA
Construction Company, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Sample Soil-Vapor
Sample I.D. Depth (ft bis) Concentration (ppm)
SV-1 3.5 0.0
SV-2 3.5 0.0
SV-3 3.5 0.0
SV-4 2.0 0.0
SV-5 4.0 0.0
sv~ 3.0 0.0
SV-7 3.5 1.2
SV-8 3.0 0.0
SV-9 4.0 0.0
SV-10 4.0 0.0
SV-11 3.0 3.8
SV-12 2.0 0.0
SV-13 4.0 15.5
SV-14 3.0 11.6
SV-15 2.0 0.0
SV-16 3.0 0.0
SV-17 3.0 88.0
SV-18 3.0 106.0
Samples were collected using the Microseeps™ soil gas sampling system and screened using a
Thermo Environmental Instruments Model 580B ponable PID.
ft bis Feet below land surface.
ppm
PID
Parts per million.
Photoionization detector.
g:~jcctlncdol'<ic0360.042'<ahlcs\SV APOR.XLS
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. 0
I
I Table 3-2. Monitor-Well Construction Summary, Sile No. 29, REA Construction Company,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
I
Well Number Date of Measuring Point Total Drilled Surface Casing Elevation of
I Installation Elevation (fl) Depth (ft bis) Depth (fl bis) Screened Zone
(fl bis)
I 29MW-l 9/25/96 1000.50 34.5 24 24-34
29MW-2 9/26/96 998.77 34.5 24 24-34
29MW-3
I
9/25/96 998.28 34 23.5 23.5-33.5
NCDEHNR·
I Wells
138010 7/14/92 1008.27 79 60 69-79
I 138011 7/29/92 1002.7 69 51 57-67
138012 6/30/92 1003.36 49.5 44.5 44.5-49.5
138014 8/6/92 1010.17 43 32 32-42
I 138015 7/28/92 1008.84 100 55 90-100
138017 7/6/92 "994.00 33 23 23-33
138018 7/16/92 994.41 59 40 45-57
138019 7/15/92 997.17 35 24 24-34
I 138020 7/20/92 994.25 89 47 77.5-87.5
138022 7/22/92 996.39 72 62 62-72
138023 8/27/92 1011.01 69 60 59-69
I 138024 8/4/92 JOI 1.91 73 68 68-73
138025 8/4/92 119 54 54-64
89 89-94
I 114 114-119
138026 8/5/92 1013.35 51 40 40-50
I
ft bis Feel below land surface.
I
I
I
I
I
g;laproject"1<dot"1<0360.0421bhlco\WELCNSTR.XLS
I GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 4-1. Summary of Groundwater Elevation Data for Site No. 29, Measured on
November 7, 1996, REA Construction Company, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Well
Number
29MW-l
29MW-2
29MW-3
NCDEHNR
Wells
138010
138011
138012
138014
138015
138017
138018
138019
138020
J38022
J38023
J38024
J38026
Top of Casing
Elevation•
1000.50
998.77
998.28
1008.27
1002.7
1003.36
1010.17
1008.84
994.00
994.41
997.17
994.25
996.39
1011.01
1011.91
1013.35
Depth.to
Water (ft)
26.35
25.94
25.41
33.41
29.01
28.98
34.01
34.02
20.08
20.48
23.61
20.74
21.57
34.65
35.24
36.79
• Elevations referenced to an arbitrary datum of 600 feet.
g:laprojectlncdol"1<0360.042'uhlcs\GWELEV.XLJ;
GERAGHTY & MlLLER. INC.
Groundwater
Elevation•
974.15
972.83
972.87
974.86
973.69
974.38
976.16
974.82
973.92
973.93
973.56
973.51
974.82
976.36
976.67
976.56
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 6-1. Swruna,y of Geoprobe"' Soil Analytical Data for Site No. 29,
Sampled on May 15 and 17, 1996, REA Construction Company,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
Sample
Identification
SS-1-2
SS-1-10
SS-3-4
SS-3-10
SS-4-4
SS-4-10
SS-2-4
REP--01-SS•
SS-5-4
SS-5-10
SS-6-4
Sample Depth
(ft bis)
2.0
10.0
4.0
10.0
4.0
10.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
10.0
4.0
I, I, I-Trichloroethane
(µg/kg dw)
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 1.3
< 1.0
< 1.2
< 1.0
1.9
< I.I
µg/kg dw Micrograms per kilogram on a dry weight basis .
•
<
ft bis
Field duplicate sample of sample collected at location SS-2-4.
Constituent was not detected above the quantitation limit.
Feet below land surface.
g:\aprojcct'ncdollool360.042'<ablcsl6-t PORXLS
GERAGHTY & MlLLER. INC.
------ - ----- ---- - - -
.•age 1 of 2
Table 6-2. Swnmary of Groundwater Analytical Dala for Samples Collected on May 15 and 17, 1996, Compared to NCDEHNR Analytical Dala from Samples Collected during
an Assumed Date ( 1992), Site No. 29, REA Construction Company, Raleigh, North Carolina.
NCAC2L Sample ID: J38019 J38019 J38020 J38020 REP--01-MW• J38022 PW GW-1
Groundwater Lab ID: Unknown 10318 Unknown 10317 10321 Unknown 10323 10418
Constituents Slaodard Date Sampled 1992' 5/15/96 1992' 5/15/96 5/15/96 1992' 5115196 5/17/96
Volatile Organics (SM6230Dl ug/L
Benzene <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2 <0.5
n-Butylbenzene NS <0.5 <0.5 <O.S 21 1 EE sec-Butyl benzene NS <O.S <O.S <0.5 0.611
tert-Butylbenzene NS <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 I 1' <0.5
Chlorobenzene so <O.S <0.5 <O.S 19 <I
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 620 <0.5 <0.5 <O.S I <I
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 620 <O.S <0.5 <0.5 0.9 <I
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5 <I
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,400 <0.5 21' 51' 10 <I
I, 1-Dlchloroethane 700 J.4 2 I <O.S 0.8 2
I, 1-Dlchloroethene 7 I I <O.S <O.S <O.~ 8
cls-1,2-Dlchloroethene 70 t.J 2J' t.J SJ' !OJ' t.J 2 <I
Diisopropyl ether NS <0.5 <0.5 <O.S I 0.7
Ethyl benzene 29 <O.S <O.S <O.S 0.9 <O.S
lsopropylbenzene NS <O.S <0.5 <O.S EB <O.S
p-lsopropyltoluene NS <O.S <O.S <O.S <0.5
Methylene chloride s <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <I'
Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE 200 <0.5 31' IJ' 2 <0.5
Naphthalene 21 <0.5 <O.S <0.5 <0.5 2
Tetrachlorothene 0.7 2 2 trace 21' I 1' trace 2 4
Toluene 1,000 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 I I
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NS <0.51' <0.51' <0.5 <111
Trlchloroethene 2.8 s.s 4 J.6 I 4J' SJ' J.6 I 2
Trichlorofluoromethane 2,100 <0.5 21' 0.611 3 <I
Footnotes appear on page 2.
g:-..,:.;~l60.~~XL3 S/IY97 GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. 0
- ----- --- - -- ---- -
Table 6-2. Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data for Samples Collected on May IS and 17, 1996, Compared to NCDEHNR Analytical Data from Samples Collected during
an Assumed Date (1992), Site No. 29, REA Construction Company, Raleigh, North Carolina.
NCAC2L Sample ID: )38019 )38019 J38020 J38020 REP--Ot-MW• J38022
Groundwater Lab ID: Unknown 10318 Unknown 10317 10321 Unknown
Constituents Standard Date Sampled 1992• S/IS/96 1992• SIIS/96 S/IS/96 1992•
Vinyl chloride O.OIS <O.S <2~' <I"'
m/p-Xylene S30 <ti.S <ti.S <ti.S
o-Xylene S30 <ti.S <ti.S <tl.S
I, I, I• Trichloroethane 200 I I <O.S <O.S
Micrograms per liter.
North Carolina Administrative Code, Title I SA, Chapter 2L, Groundwater Quality Standards, February 8, 1994.
µg/L
NCAC2L
NS Numerical !SA NCAC 2L Standard has not been established; therefore, detectable concentrations of these substances in groundwater are considered
to be in excess of North Carolina Water Quality Standards.
~----,!Constituent concentration exceeds the I SA NCAC 2L Standard.
Field duplicate sample of sample collected at well J38020 . •
<
2
'
+
Constituent was not detected above the quantitation limit.
Constituent concentration is qualified as estimated (J) due to calibration data outside QC limits.
Constituent concentration is qualified as estimated (J) due to matrix spike data outside QC limits.
Constituent concentration is qualified u estimated (J)-ficld duplicate sample criteria were not met.
Constituent concentration is qualified as undetected(<) due to associated equipment blank sample contamination.
Analytical Method is unknown. Date of sample collection is unknown but assumed to be in 1992.
No analytical data is available for this constituent
PW
10323
S/IS/96
I
2
0.6
<O.S
-,'age 2 of 2
GW-1
10418
S/11196
<I
0.9
<tl.S
34
g:.-oj~.()(2'.lal,b\NCDEHNR.XLS 5/IY97 GERAGHTY & MlLLER, INC.
-
0
---

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-· -

-

-
Table 6-3. Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data for Site No. 29, Sampled on September 30, 1996, REA Construction Company, Raleigh,
North Carolina.
NCAC2L Sample ID: 29MW-1 REP-01-GW• 29MW-2 29MW-3 138019 138020 138022
Groundwater Lab ID: 15536 15544 15537 15538 15539 15540 15541
Constituents Standard Date Sampled: 9{30/96 9(30/96 9'30/96 9'30/96 9'30/96 9(30/96 9'30/96
Volatile Qrganics <USEPA Method 8260B}
µg/L
Benzene I <I <I <I <12 <I 2 11 2
Chloroform 0,19 1 1 <1 <12 <1 <1 <1
1,1-Dlcbloroethene 7 <1 <1 4 44 <1 <1 <1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70 <1 <1 <1 <12 <1 3 13
Ethylbenzene 29 <I <I <I <12 <I <I 2
Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 200 <I <I <I <12 <I 9 <I
Naphthalene 21 <I <I <I <12 <! 2 4
Toluene 1,000 <I <I <I <12 <I 3 IS
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 <1 <1 19 160 <1 <1 <1
Trichloroethene 0,7 <I <1 6 <12 2 1ffim 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NS <I <I <I <12 <I
. 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene NS <I <I <! <12 <I <I 3
Vinyl chloride 0.015 <1 <1 <1 <12 <1 <1 9
m/p-Xylene 530 <2 <2 <2 <25 <2 2 9
o-Xylene 530 <I <I <I <12 <I I 6
Micrograms per liter. µg/L
NCAC2L
NS
North Carolina Administrative Code; Title !SA, Chapter 2L, Groundwater Quality Standards, February 8, 1994.
•
<
Numerical ISA NCAC 2L Standard has not been established; therefore, detectable concentrations of these substances in groundwater are considered
to be in excess of North Carolina Water Quality Standards.
Constituent concentration exceeds the !SA NCAC 2L Standard.
Field duplicate sample of groundwater sample collected at 29MW-l.
Constituent was not detected above the quantitation limit.
1:\aproject\nt.dot'nc:0360.042\llblc:1\SUMMAR Y .XLS \5/13197 GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURES
g,loprojea-'«<l360.<>m,q,o,t'<-,1."°"IJ.M,y-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0 z
I
Fl
~~
County
Location <O m
Fl
1/2 0
Fl Fl Fl I
SCALE 1: 24000
Contour Interval 10 Feet Datum is Mean Sea Level
1 Mil[
tl '. ~ ii o· I -.. . . ,
li ;ll-l--------------.--------------------.------1 U.S.G.S. 7.5 Minute Series Raleigh East and Woke Forest, N.C. Topographic Quadrangles.
0
i5
JI,' GERAGHTY A~ & MILLER, INC.
.. .Environ11tental Services
SITE LOCATION MAP
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE #29 .
RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE
2-1
I
I
I
I
••-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
..:
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF WATER SUPPLY WELL ~
:-+-
PLANT
ENTRANCE
J38024
-+--+-J:38026
J38014
-+-
J38023 ...
FORMER CJ /J38015
tw.JBURT~
SITE
PW-VLT PW ♦
BENCH MARK IS FFE (lYP)
ELEV = 1000 (ASSUMED)
29MW-1
J38022
-+-
-+-J38017
J38019
REA CONST. ASPHALT---~-,. ♦
LABORATORY . 29MW-2 ♦ \ • -♦ 29MW-3 J38020
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF SEPTIC TANK
-+--+-J38018
...... JJB010 ♦J38012
PW
ABLE
MANUFACTURING
.4.,. GERAGHTY
Ar & MILLER, INC.
• Environm:,ental Services
-LEGEND
-+-WATER SUPPLY \\'ELL
-+-MONITOR WELL
0 200'
SITE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE NO. 29
RM..EGH, NORTI-i CAROLINA
400' 600'
FIGURE
2-2
I
I t
I
I
I
I
1-,~
I
I
I
!
I
I
I ,.
I
I
d z
~ C:
PRIMARY
COLLECTOR
HMA
STORAGE
2,000 GAL
ANTISTRIP
HOT SV-11 0
---1+---BINS
NATlJRAL
GAS LINES
□
---ROTARY DRYER
SV-6
SV-7
0
SV-18
0
0
TRUCK ~
STAND L__J
SV-4 0
SV-12
0
0 0
SV-8 SV-9
0
SV-13
0
SV-17
PLANT
ENTRANCE
REA CONSTRUCTION
ASPHALT LABORATORY
0
SV-15
SV-2
,--1
0 sv-
J38019
+
0
SV-10
~\___! 0
sV-14
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF SEPTIC TANK
0
SV-16
.A_, GERAGHTY
AIIJ' & MILLER, INC.
.. Environmental SeTVices
+
J38022
LEGEND
+ EXISTING NCDEHNR
MONITOR WELL
0 SOIL-VAPOR SAMPLING
+
J38020
5C.W' IN ffil
0 JO
SOIL-VAPOR SAMPLING LOCATION MAP
MAY 14, 1996
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE f29
RAI..DGH, NORTH CAROLINA
LOCATION
FIGURE
3-1
I
n ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
le
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
·-
I
i
Ill
cl z lE < "" C
I
d PRIMARY z COLLECTOR ~ re
n HMA w STORAGE
\ 'll( / 2,000 GAL
ANTISTRIP
HOT
--I+---BINS
SS-3
e
NATURAL
GAS LINES
□
----ROTARY
DRYER
e
SS-5
TRUCK~
STAND L__J
e
SS-4
PLANT
ENTRANCE
REA CONSTRUCTION
ASPHALT LABORATORY
1--,
I I e
~\-SS-1
J38019
+
\_ APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF SEPTIC TANK
.41,' GERAGHTY
Ar & MILLER, INC.
A.if Environmental Se-ruices
+
J38022
-LEGEND
+ EXISTING NCDEHNR MONITOR
WELL
e GEOPROBE"' SOIL SAMPLING
LOCATION
+ J38020
SCIU IN FttT o~--~=~:,o~--~=~'°
GEOPROBE"' SOIL SAMPLING LOCATION MAP
MAY 15-17, 1996
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE #29
RAL£1GH, NORTH CAROi.iN-'
FIGURE
3-2
I
•• I
!
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
..:
c ~ 0 "' a. !l:
a
(; z ,i < "' C
B
ci z
~ .:
PRIMARY
COLLECTOR
a HMA
STORAGE
I ':I( 2,000 GAL
ANTISTRIP
HOT
--++--BINS
NATURAL
GAS LINES
□
----ROTARY
DRYER
A
GW-1
TRUCK~
STAND L..J
CONTROL
ROOM/
DATE SAMPLED 5-17-96
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE 2
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE B
TETRACHLOROETHENE (PCE) 4
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 34
TRICHLOROETHENE (TCE) 2
PLANT
ENTRANCE
REA CONSTRUCTION
ASPHALT LABORATORY
1--1
I I
DATE SAMPLED 5-15-96
1 , 1 -DICHLOROETHANE
1, 1 -DICHLOROETHENE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (PCE)
1, 1 , 1 -TRICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TCE)
J3B019
+
~ \_ """"""' """'" OF SEPTIC TANK
2
1
2J
2
1
4
+
J38020
DATE SAMPLED 5-15-96
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL-TERT BUTYL ETHER
TETRACHLOROETHENE (PCE)
TRICHLOROETHENE (TC!::)
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
2J 1 .
BJ
3J
2J
4J
2J
<2
+
J3B022
..
-LEGEND
+ EXISTING NCDEHNR
MONITOR WELL
A GEOPROBE~ GROUNDWATER
SAMPLE LOCATION
ALL CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED
AS MICROGRAMS PER LITER (µg/L)
J38022 WAS NOT SAMPLED
J=ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION
SCAl£ .. rn:r
D >D
.A~ GERAGHTY
Alf & MILLER, INC.
DISSOLVED T AAGEr AND NON-T AAGET CHLORINATED
SOL VENTS CONCENTRATION MAP
.Alf Environmental Seruices NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE #29
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE
3-3
I
I i •• d
i
I
I !
..:
n I
i I I ,;_
I I i5
!9 1 ; I
I
I I
i
~
~ ..
I i
~
I i
I "-~ .,. I!! i1
~
I
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
PLANT
ENTRANCE
OF WATER SUPPLY WELL ~
~
....
J38026 FORl.!ER HALIBURTON
976.56 SITE
--t ......
...... ......
......
♦ J38014
976.16
...... ......
......
BENCH MARK IS ITT (TYP)
ELEV = 1000 (ASSUl.!ED)
J3t12 /
......
29MW-1
974.15
-+-
REA CONSTRUCTION
ASPHALT
LABORATORY J38018
973.23 ......
...... 974.38 ...... ...... ......
ABLE J38019 ,. ♦ 973.56
291.!W-2_._ • t.._ J38017
973.92 1.!ANUFACT\JRING
972.83 T 291.!W-3 _ .._ .._
972.87 -..,
97J
APPROXIMATE LOCATION .0()
OF SEPTIC TANK
Jllf GERAGHTY
A.-& MILLER, INC.
., Environm..ental Services
LEGEND
... 1.!0NITOR WELL
+ WATER SUPPLY WELL
973.23 WATIER-LEVEL ELEVATION
-974.00-POTENTIOl.!ETRIC SURFACE CONTOUR .. DIRECTION OF GROUNDWATIER FLOW
......
......
......
....976 .0() ......
..., s1s.oo
.... 974.0(J
0 200' 400'
SURFICIAL AQUIFER POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP
NOVEMBER 7, 1996
NORlH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TIWISPORTATION
SITE NO. 29
RAI..EJGH, NORTH CAROLINA
600'
FIGURE
4-1
D
~-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1~
11
I
I
=
I
I
I
i
,:;
i
.:
1
I
I
i
~
i
a z
i
APPROXIMATE LOCATION PLANT
ENTRANCE
OF WATER SUPPLY WELL '\
~
BENCH MARK IS ITT (lYP)
ELEV = 1000 (ASSUMED)
J38024
-'f76.67
J38023
976.36 ... FORMER
HAIJBURTON
SrTE
- --976.00
---ABLE
MANUFACTURING
------974.00
REA CONST. ASPHALT---~:___
. LABORATORY -r
APPROXIMATE LOCATIONJ
OF SEPTIC TANK
...
J38020
973.51
~llf GERAGHTY At, & MILLER, INC.
., Environmental Services
LEGEND
... MONITOR WELL + WATER SUPPLY WELL
974.82 WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION
-974.00-POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE CONTOUR .. DIRECTION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW N
0 200' 400'
BEDROCK AQUIFER POTENTlOMETAIC SURFACE MAP
NOVEMBER 7, 1996
NORTH CAROUNA DEPAR'IMENT OF lRANSPORTAllON
SIT£ NO. 29
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROUNA
600'
FIGURE
4-2
B
I 1•
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
I
;
I
I
I .~
I
i
d
i
..:
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF WATER SUPPLY WELL ~
:+-
PlANT
ENTRANCE
BENCH MARK IS FFE (TYP)
ELEV = 1000 (ASSUMED)
-+--+-
J38026
(ND)
J38024
(ND)
FORMER=""'-\
HALIBURTON "
SITE PW-Vl.T
(TRACE
J38018t (12)
J38017
(1.91)
J38023
♦(ND)
♦ J38014
(ND)
PW
(7.7)
-__,.;n,~ /
/
/
/ I 38019 /
\ (5.5) TRACE //
\ 29MW-3 /
\ ND .,,,,.,,,,✓
' 29 MW-2 / _,,
,..... 6 _.,,...,,. ...... ___ __.
.A~ GERAGHTY
Ala, & MILLER, INC.
• Environm.ental Services
ABLE
MANUFACTURING
N
+ +
(7.7)
6
--20--
( )
ND
0
LEGEND
WATER SUPPLY WELL
MONITOR WELL
NCDEHNR SAMPLING EVENT
GERAGHTY & MILLER SAMPLING EVENT
ISOCONCENTRATION CONTOUR (ug/1)
NCDEHR SAMPLING EVENT
CONSlllUENT NOT DETECTED ABOVE
LABORATORY OUANITTATION LIMIT
RESUL1S IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (ug/L)
ANALYTICAL RESUL1S FROM DIFFERENT DATES
200' 400' 600'
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~
REGIONAL ISOCONCENTRA TION MAP FOR TRICHLOROElHENE
IN GROUNDWATER
NORTH CAAOUNA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE NO. 29
RAl.£IGH, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE
5-1
I
I .-
1
I
I
I
I
·I
··~
I
I
!
I
I
=
i
·-
I
I
I
i
~
.,
i
cl z
i
... ;
Ii!
c!!i
~
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF WATER SUPPLY WEll ~
~
MW-1
{ND~
REA CONST. ASPHALT---L ,....,_-«.
LABORATORY
PLANT
ENTRANCE
+ +
(ND)
44
LEGEND
WATER SUPPLY WEll
MONITOR WEll
NCDEHNR SAMPLING EVENT
GERAGHTY & MlllER SAMPLING EVENT r J38024
... (ND)
J38023
♦(ND) ---15A NCAC 2L WATER QUALITY STANDARD (7.0 ug/L)
~26
♦ J38014
(ND)
(ND) cJ.
HALIBURTON "' -(ND)
SITE
FORMER~ \ /J38015
PW-VLT PW~ ----------J38010 ~ .1. "an.o {ND) + ♦J38012
PW {ND)
J38022 ♦ {ND)
APPROXIMATE LOCATION t 3BOlB
OF SEPTIC TANK (ND)
+ J38020 J38017
ABLE
MANUFACTURING
(ND) {ND)
J38019
1 (ND)
29MW-2
4
RESULTS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (ug/L)
0 200' 400' ----
J9f GERAGHTY
Alif & MILLER, INC.
M· Environmental Seruices
REGIONAL ISOCONCENTRATION MAP FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
IN GROUNDWATER
NORrn CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SITE NO. 29
RAl..£JGH, NORTH CAROUNA
600'
F1GURE
5-2
I
I
I
!
l'J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·-I
..:
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF WATER SUPPLY WELL '\_
~
J38022 ug/L
cis-1,2-DCE 1.3
TCE 3.6
29MW-1 ug/L
CHLOROFORM 1
PLANT
ENTRANCE
rJ38024
~26
ND
FORMER="--CJ \ HALIBURTON ~
SITE.=-----
.__._.__ I ~~~TI ~E I \ +
APPROXIMATE Ir LOCATION OF
REA CONST. ASPHALT---e:!J /,._ SEPTIC TANK
LABORATORY ..
29MW-2 ug/L
T,1-DCE 4
TCE 6
29MW-3 ug/L
1,1-DCE 44
J38019
TCE
1,1-DCA
cis-1,2-DCE
1,1-DCE
1,1,1-TCA
ug/L .
5.5
3.4
1.3
1
1
J38020 ug/L
TCE 3.6
cis-1,2-DCE 1.3
J38017 ug/L
cis-1,2-DCE 11
TCE 1.9
J38018 ug/L
cis-1,2-DCE 46
TCE 12
TRANS-1,2-DCE 0.77
1,1-DCE 0.61
J38014 ug/L
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 0.83 _
J38023
♦ND
J38015 ug/L
cis-1,2-DCE 12
TCE 7.7
J38010 ug/L
LEGEND
... MONITOR WELl
+ WATER SUPPLY WELl
ND CONSTITUENT NOT DffiCTED ABOVE
LABORATORY QUMTITATION LIMIT
RESULTS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (ug/L)
ANALYTICAL RESULTS FROM DIFFERENT DATES
-----l cis-1,2-DCE 45
TCE 24
J38012 ug/L
CIS -1,2-DCE 5.2
TCE 4.3
PW ug/L
cis-1,2-DCE 146
TCE 50
TRANS-1,2-DCE 2
ABLE
MANUFACTURING
J38011
cis-1,2-DCE
TCE
TRANS 1,2-DCE
1,1,1-TC.A
1,1-DCE
ug/L
20
62
1.4
0.4
0.38
A.,. GERAGHTY I &. MILLER, INC.
Envi.ronmental Services
I
0 200' 400' -----'
REGIONAL TARGET CHLORINATED SOLVENTS DETECTED
IN GROUNDWATER
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION
SITE NO. 29
RAlEJGH, NOR'll1 CAROLINA
600'
FIGURE
5-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
APPENDIX A
NCDOT AND NCDEHNR LETTER OF AGREEMENT
g:\aprnjcctlncdotl.nc0360.04Tlrq,ort\rcport2 doc\l).M,,y-97
GERAGHTY E.<? MILLER. INC. 0
I
I
I
I
I
)A.,\ES B. Hur-rr JR..
GOVE~--:QR.
Arthur Mouberry
_ .... ,. -
.. :t. ~l t ii 42260-96+141N
~-..-
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GARL.\NO B. GAAAITT JR..
SECil.ITAR.Y
DMS!ON OF HlGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201. RAJ.EIGH. N.C 27611-520!
April 24, 1996 pawq
-MAY O o 1996
I Chief, Greundwater Section
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 29535
DEPAHTMEITT OF TRANSPORT AT\ON
SAFEiY fl.NO LOSS CONTROL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Re: NCDOT A.sphaltic Materials Jesting Priority Sites
Interim Screening Investigation Letter of Agreement
Dear w!r. Mouberry,
On April 16, 1996 a meeting was held between the North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) and the North Carolina Department of Transportation
(NCDOT) to discuss an interim screening investigation at the subject asphalt sites. An rurreement betv,een . -
NCDEHNR and NCDOT was reached on the scope of the work to be followed during the interim
screening investigation. As discussed in the meeting, none of the subject sites are ovmed by the NCDOT.
Site activity by NCDOT personnel was limited to ASTM asphalt extraction testing in the laboratories.
Fallowing the screening investigation, it is our understanding that for sites having no soil impacts (based
on published guidance by NCDEHNR Groundwater Section), and no groundwater impacts (based on Title
I SA, Subchapter 2L, NCAC), NCDOT will submit an interim screening investigation letter report of
findings requesting no further action which will be reviewed and approved by NCDEHNR. NCDEl-rl'rR.
has agreed to respond in writing within two to three weeks upon receipt of each letter report. Toe
following summarizes the scope of work that will be uniformly executed at each of the asphalt laboratory
sites based on th.is meeting.
The objective of this interim screening investigation is to focus on the identification of
contaminants in soil and groundwater associated with the asphaltic materials testing activities. These
contaminants consist of chlorinated solvents such as Carbon Tetrachloride, T richlorethylene,
Trichlorethane, and related degradation compounds. The suspected area of contamination at each of the
priority asphalt sites is with.in the vicinity of the former/current asphaltic materials testing b.bs. Soil and
£Toundwater samoles will be collected at e3ch site as described below. -.
A soil-vaoor survev using manual soil probes, and field soil-vapor screening instruments (i.e. a
port,ble gas chr;mato!IT3;h) will be utilized to initially identify localized "hot spots" of chlorinated
solvent cont:llnination~ F~llo\ving the soil-vapor survey, an array of six to ten soil borings using direct
push technology (DPT) will be inst3lled at e3ch site in the vicinity of the asphaltic materials testing J:ib. @
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
For sites at which use of DPT is unsuccessful (i.e. based on local geology), conventional drilling methods
will be employed. If conventional drilling methods are used, and a change in the sampling plan becomes
necessary, NCDOT will initiate discussion with NCDEHNR Groundwater Section to determine a revised
arnpling arrangement. At all borin2 locations, adequate measures will be taken to avoid the transfer of
contamination from one sampling zone to another.
From these borino locations soil samoles will be collected at shallow depths below the 2round " . -surface at two depth intervals. These soil borings will be installed at locations in the vicinity of the
asphaltic laboratory buildino which have been visually identified as suspect cc,ntarnination areas. and at "' the "hot spots" identified from the soil-vapor survey. Sampling depths will typically be from zero to five
feet and five to ten feet below ground surface. Soil samples will be collected at each depth interval and
shipped to an analytical laboratory for analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOC) using United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test method 8021.
Eight to ten groundwater samples will be collected from the bor..I!g loec.tions. These ground·.vater
samples will be collected by advancing the probe approximately ten feet below the groundwater table.
Samples will be obtained by methods that will minimize agitation. At two of the boring locations, down
gradient of the suspected area of contamination, the sampling point will be further advanced to
intermediate depths below the water table to characterize the vertical extent of contamination.
Groundwater samples will be analyzed for VOC's by Standard Method 6230-D. Three temporary
piezometers v-.ill be installed at selected locations to evaluate the hydraulic gradient at each of the sites.
An interim screening investigation letter report will follow each investigation if it is demonstrated
that there are no unacceptable levels of groundwater coritamination present based on the 2L groundwater
, uality sla.ndards or soil contamination based on published guidance by the NCDEHNR Groundwater
Section.. For sites that do not meet this criteria, additional investigations will be conducted and
comprehensive site assessments will be prepared.
If after review of this Jetter of agreement you find it necessary to ma.1<e changes please notify me
immediately. We would like to begin the site investigations as quickly as possible, therefore your prompt
response is requested. Should you have questions or comments I may be reached at [phone].
Sincerely: ~
~C-.
Thomas C. Niver, .G., CJ-Ii\,Iiv!
Environmental Engineer, Safety & Loss Control
Accepted by:
~-7?Z~t~7
Anhur Mouberry, P.E.
Chief, Groundwater Section
~c: Paul Roberts, NCDOT
Ted Bush, NCDEHNR
Jay Zirn.merrn::tn, NCDEffi-m.
Frederic D. Rash, Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
Rudv Smith"ick Catlin & Associates, Inc. . ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOK[ATION
42260-96-9-l 74C:
)AMES B. Hu;-;T )R. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GAI\L·IND B. GAR.R.ETT j R.
GOVE!Z..'-<OIZ
Mr. Arthur Mouberry, P.E.
Groundwater Section Chief
P.O. BOX 25201. IW.EIGH. N.C 276IH20I
July 3, 1996
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resource
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC, 27626-0535
RE: Laboratory Analytical Methods for Phase II Investigation Lener of Agreement
Dear Mr. Mouberry,
SKR.IT . .1.,RY
On June 13, 1996 a meeting was held between the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) and the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT). This meeting was held to discuss the execution of laboratory analytical
methods for comprehensive site assessments (CSA's) at asphaltic materials testing priority sites 22-
72. As discussed in the meeting, NCDOT is prepared to execute the second phase (Phase JJ) of
investigation at several sites where the interim screening investigation has been completed, or did .
not provide conclusive infonnation. This lener represents the agreement between DEHNR and
NCDOT to use the proposed analytical methods, as defined below, to conduct CSA's at the asphaltic
materials testing priority sites 22-72.
NCDOT Consultants will follow the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Groundwater Section
Guidelines For The lnvesti2ation and Remediation of Soils and Groundwater for the Phase II
investigation. As stated within the guidelines, vertical and horizontal delineation of groundwater
"'ill use U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 601-and 602 for volatile organic
compounds; for the vertical and horizontal delineation of soil, EPA Method 8021 ,,ill be used.
Groundwater samples \\111 be collected and analyzed for VOC's by Standard Method 6230sD, prior
tb"j:ilum·e aeline:ation, for sites where groundwater analytical results were not obtained from the
Interim Phase I :Siie Investigation.
In additi~n, soil and groundwater may be collected and analyzed for VOCs by EPA
. Me1~od ?260-B. These samples will be collected from locations centralized within the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
42260-96-9-l 74N
contaminant plume for compound confirmation. If Standard Method 6230-D and/or EPA
Method 8021 analytical results show concentrations of polycyclic aromatic compounds (P AH),
soil and groundwater samples may be collected and analyzed. The soil samples will be analyzed
by EPA Method 8270-B, and groundwater samples will be analyzed by EPA Method 625 for
confirmation of semi-volatile compounds, for base neutral compounds only.
If after review of this letter of agreement you find it necessary to make changes, please notify me
immediately. We have already initiated Phase lI investigations at some sites, therefore your
prompt response is appreciated. Should you have any que_stions or comments I may be reached
at (9 I 0)334-4273.
s,,~'4C~
Thomas C. Niver, P.ci., CHMM
Environmental Engineer, Safety & Loss Control
Accepted by:
~~7 Anhur Mouberry, P.E.
Groundwater Section Chief
Enclosures
dmm\TCN
cc: Paul Roberts, North Carolina DOT
Duane MacEntee, North Carolina DOT
Ted Bush, North Carolina DEHNR
J;Fcieric;;, r}fiR'asiiFGerul!ty: &?:.Miller ,Inc. ... -~•ii= Rudy Smithwick, Catlin & Associates, Inc.
rn ~J~ ~::~ m
G & M RALEIGH _j
----

-
------------

-
OMM -Safety & l.oss umtml
1\14\97
Target Chlorinated Solvents Transformation Pathways
Carbon Tetrachloride .I
Tdmchlcm:methane .{ .
Perchloromelhal'IC (Pere)
11
CAS # 000056-23-5 ~ 2L-O.Sppb
I"<·.,. : r-::: ..:=~·-· ::·.·,:: " .. --·=, ... -:,,,_:;
Transformation Pathways for Various Volatile Priority
Pollutants in Soil-Groundwater Systems from Smith and
Dragun, 1984.
Chloroform Methylene Chloride
Trichloromelhane . Uichloromelhane
CAS# 000067-66-3 CAS # 000075-09-2
2L-0.19ppb ZL-5.0ppb
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
(c 1,2 DCC)
cis-1,Z-Dichloroethylcne
CAS# 000156-59-2
2L. 70oob
' Trichioroethene (TCE)
.Trichloroethylcnc
CAS# CXXX'79-0l-6
2L-2.8ppb
/,.:••·-' ,,,: ,.,.,"·:.,., .. ,., ,•:.c ,:,•.·· •· =.:' -~ ..
1,1,1 Trichloroethane 0,1,1 TCA) ! -trans-1,z-t11c111oroe,11ene
Methyl chloroform ;i (I 1,2 DCE)
CAS# 000071-55-6 ·, Trans-1,2-Oichloroethylcne
2L • 200.0ppb 'I Trans-Acetylene Chlmidc
: ·, .:.•-"•" ,;:_ -•·.· ·ci.'.o:,;::. ;J CAS# 000156-60-5
'
;•;.,
2L • 70-1..
1,1-u1cn1oroeu,ene \1,1 "--"--'.,
Vinylidene Chloride
end: Leg -1,1-Dichloroethylene
□,
CAS# 0Cro75-35-4
21.-7ppb
L., ,.·I Prima,y Compounds
D -Dt:g,,arlation C.Ompxuwh
t,i-Dichloroethane 0,1 DCA)
ppb -~•is per liilliou CAS# OOOJ75-34-3
MDL -Mc:ll1od Dc-tection Limit -2L -700.0ppb
?L -NCACTIM;02L0200 Croundwater Sb11Jud,
Methyl Chloride
Cl1loro1nethane
CAS # 000074-87-3
21.-MDL
' . -
,,
I ' I Vinyl Chloride ., :1 Chloroelht!r1e
, . I Chloroethylene
CAS# 000075-01-4
2L-l.5x 10 .z ppb .
Chloroethane . [thyl Chloride
CAS# 000075-00-3
Interim 2L -2800pph
1111
-

-
-----

-
--'
Decision Process For Interim
Phase I Site Assessment
-
y
---

-
--
Executed Entry Agreement
Is it feasible to do an Interim Phase I Site Assessment based
on site specific limitations?(i.e. bedrock, etc ... )
Interim Phase I Site Assessment -As outlined in the Interim Screening Investigation Letter of Agreement
( 6-JO soil samples, and 8-10 groundwater samples)
y
All orr
Sampling Points
Collected
N
Report of NSF
y
DMM -NCIJOT Safety & Loss Control
Some sampling points, but not al1 collected Total flrl failure
(hit rock)
N
Soil Points
collected, but no
groundwater
Do analyticals exceed
802 I levels?
Auger/ Air for
additional
sampling points
Oo analyticals exceed
6230() & 8021 levels?
N
Report of NSF
y
Soil & some
groundwater
samples obtained
Do analyticals exceed
s2goo & 8021 levels'!
N
Auger/ Air for
additional
sampling points
y
Do analyticals exceed
62300 & 8021 levels?
N
Report of NSi'
-..
- - ----- - - - ---- - -
Phase II Analyticals For Soil & Groundwater
Phase II
Groundwater Analyticals Soil Analyticals
llave 6230-D analyticals
been run for Interim Phase 17
y
Collect Samples
for chemical methods 60 I &
602 for groundwater
plume delineation.
DMM -NCDOT Safety & Loss Control
Collect
Samples for
method 8260-B
and/or 625
for hot spot
confirmation.
N
Collect first round of
samples for chemical
method 6230-D.
Collect Samples for chemical methods
601& 602 for groundwater
plume delineation.
Collect
Samples for
method 8260-B
and/or 625
for hot spot
confirmation.
Collect samples for
chemical method 8021
for soil plume
delineation.
Collect
Samples for
method 8260-B
and/or 8270-B
for hot spot
confinnation.
1111
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ACCEPTABLE SOIL CONCENTRATIONS OF TARGET COMPOUNDS
s c.. C, C,
Ac,::,¢>ble A<=piable
Solubilily in H,<l 2L GW Slandanl Soil C<>ncentr.mon Soil Concentration
Constituent (mg/L) (mgll.) (mg/Kg)
Carbon tetrachloride 800.0 0.0003 0.00147
1, 1, 1-T richioroethane 4,400.0 0.20 8.14911
Trichloroethylene (TCE) 1,100.0 0.0028 0.03281
Chlorofonn 8,168.7 0.000190 0.00021
Methylene chloride 16.200.0 0.005 0.01761
Methyl chloride 16,260.0 NS NA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3,500.0 0.07 1.97417
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 6,300.0 0.07 1.43026
1,1-Dichloroe(hene 3,900.0 0.007 0.06304
1, 1-Dichloroethane 5,500.0 0.70 45.47299
Vinyl chloride 1,900.0 O.O(XX)15 0.00001
Chloroethane 4,700.0 2.800000 380.37500
Notes:
S values from Montgomery, J.H., and LM. Welkom, Groundwale< Chemicals Desk Reference. 1990.
C, is delermined by the following equation as.defined in ·Groundwater Section Guidelines
For The Investigation and Remediation of Sals and Groundwaler" (NCDEHNR, DWO, June 1993):
Cs= [Cd(0.0021s)°"373]1-47
(ug/Kg)
1.5
8.149.1
32.8
0.2
17.6
NA
1,974.2
1,430.3
63.0
45,473.0
0.01
380,375.0
This equation is not apprscable to petraeum substances or compounds which are contained P'l petroleum substances. ,
All solubility dala is repor1ed as mg/I. at 25 •c.
Solubifrty for 1,1,1-bichloroelhane is based on 20 •c.
NS -No 15 NCAC 2L Slandard Exists fer this compound.
NA -Not appficable.
ncdoVnt0360.001/lntolOLMSOIUX1.S
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXC
EDRREPORT
g:\aprojcctl.:K:dot\nc0360. 042\rq,011\nportl. doc\ l 3-May-97
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The EDR-Radius Map
· with GeoCheck™
REA Construction
3010 Greshams Lake Road
Raleigh, NC 27615
Inquiry Number: 1116610.lp
!\lay 01, 1996
~! Environmental
Data
• : Resources, Inc.
• • • Creators of Toxicheck/.~ . -
The Source
For Environmental
I
Risk Management
Data
3530 Post Road
Southport, Connecticut 06490
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~'-----------T-A_B_LE_o_F_c_o_N_r_E_N_r_s ______ _____J
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary _______________________________________________________ ES1
Topographic Map. ________ • ____________________ •. ______ ._._ .. ____________ . 2
GeoCheck Summary. _________ : __ • __ •• __ •. _____ . __ •.. _. _____ ••• ______ .____ a
Overview Map. ________________________ • _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4
Detail Map ____________ · _______________________ .__________________________ 5
Map Summary -All Sites. _______ . ____ . __ • ____ • __ •. ____________ •. ___ .•.• ____ 6
Map Summary -Sites with higher or the same elevation as the Target Property. _______ . 7
Map Findings.___________________________________________________________ 8
Orphan Summary. ___________________________ • ___________________________ . 13
APPENDICES
GeoCheck Version 2.1. _________________________________________________ . ___ A1
Government Records Searched/ Data Currency Tracking Addendum._______________ A2
Thank you tor your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer
This Aepon contains information obtained trom a variety or public sources and EDA makes no representation or warranty
regarding the accuracy. reliability. quality. or completeness o1 said inlormation or the intormation contained in this repon.
The customer shall assume lull responsibility for the use of this report.
No warranty of merchantability or of fitness lor a particular purpose. expressed or implied, shall apply and EDA
specifically disclaims the making ol such warranties. In no event shall EDA be liable to anyone for special,
incidental. consequential or exemplary damages. Copyright (c) 1996 by EDR. All rights reserved.
TCl 116610.lp Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
U'-----________ E_x_E_c_u_r_,v_E_s_u_M_M_A_R_v ________ __J
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
(EDA). The search met the specific requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments, E 1527•94, or custom distances requested by the user.
The address of the subject property for which the search was intended is:
3010 GRESHAMS LAKE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27615
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ( ·reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the subject property or within the ASTM E 1527•94 search radius around the subject
property for the following Databases:
NPL: ••.•.•••.•.••••••.••••..• National Priority List
Delisted NPL: .•.•...•.....••. NPL Deletions •
RCRIS•TSD: •....••...•.•..•. Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
CERCLIS: •••••••.••.•...•.•.. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System
CERC·NFRAP: ...•..••....••. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System
CORRACTS: ................. Corrective Action Report
RAATS: ...................... RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRIS·SOG: ••.•••...•••.•.•• Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
RCRIS·LOG: .•.••..••........ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
HMIRS: ..•..•.....••.•..•.... Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
PADS: •.....•..•..••.•.•••••. PCB Activity Database System
ERNS: .........•...........•. Emergency Response Notification System
FINDS: .••.•..•..••.•..•..•..• Facility Index System
TRIS: •••.•..•..•.••.••..•..•.. Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
NPL Liens: .•....••..•..•.. , .. Federal Superfund Liens
TSCA: •..•...........•........ Toxic Substances Control Act
MLTS: ••..••••.•.••.••.•••.•.. Material Licensing Tracking System
RODS: .•..•.....••.•..•..•... Records Of Decision
CONSENT: ..........•..•..•.. Supertund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Unmapped (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
Search Results:
Search results for the subject property and the search radius, are listed below:
Subject Property:
The subject property was identified in the following government records. For more information on this
property see page 8 of the attached EDA Radius Map report:
Site
GRESHAM LAKE ASPHALT PLANT
3010 GRESHAM LAKE RD
RALEIGH, NC 27619
Database(s) EPA ID
UST N/A
TC1116010.1p EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~--------E_x_Ec_uT_1_v_E_s_u_M_M_A_R_v ________ ___J
Surrounding Properties:
Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the subIect property are in the left hand column; those
with a lower elevation are in the right hand column. Page numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report
where detailed data on individual sites may be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
SHWS: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states· equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already by listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using
state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid
for by potentially responsible parties. The data comes from the Department ol Environment, Health.
& Natural Resources· Inactive Hazardous Sites Program.
A review of the State Haz. Waste list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/15/1995 has revealed that
there are 2 State Haz. Waste sites within approximately 1 Mile of the subject property.
E_qual/Higher Elevation
GRESHAMS LAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK
ROWLAND LANDFILL
Page/Map ID
10/2
10/A3
Lower Elevation
SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid waste
disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data comes from the Department of Environment,
Health & Natural Resources· List ol Solid Waste Facility Contacts in Alpha Order.
A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/12/1996 has revealed that there is 1
SWF/LF site within approximately 0.5 Miles of the subject property_
Equal/Higher Elevation
ROWLAND DEMO LANDFILL
Page/Map ID
10/A4
Lower Elevation
Page/Map ID
Page/Map ID
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incidents Management Database contains an inventory of reported
leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data comes from the Department of Environment.
Health & Natural Resources· Incidents by Address.
A review of the LUST list. as provided by EDR, and dated 01/05/1996 has revealed that there is 1 LUST
site within approximately 0.5 Miles ol the subject property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
STAY-RIGHT
Page/Map ID
10/6
Lower Elevation Page/Map ID
TC1116610.lp EXECUTIVE SUt.lMARY 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
~~---------E_x_E_c_u_r_iv_E_s_u_M_M_A_R_v ________ ~
UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under
Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data comes from the
Department of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources· Petroleum Underground Storage Tank
Database.
A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/15/1995 has revealed that there are 2 UST
sites within approximately 0.25 Miles of the subject property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
BILLINGS & GARRETT, INC.
WEEKS CONST COMPANY
Page/Map ID
8/1
11 {7
Lower Elevation Page/Map ID
TC1116610.1p EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Uc_ _________ Ex_Ec_u_r_iv_E_s_u_M_M_A_R_v ________ ____J
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped:
Site Name
MALLINKRODT, INCORPORATED
BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.
RJR/MALLINKRODT
WESTINGHOUSE ELEC METER & LIGHT
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP 3-171-01
SIR WALTER GUN CLUB
AUBURN CHURCH ROAD DRUM
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
NCDA PESTICIDE LAB STORAGE
NC STATE UNIV. (LOT 86 FARM UNIT)
ITT CORPORATION
WARD TRANSFORMER
ITT CORPORATION
CHLORIDE AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES
BAKER (MAGGIE) PROPERTY
WEATHERSFIELD PLACE CONDOMINIUM
ESB INC
W.E. GARRISON COMPANY
WAKE COUNTY
WAKE COUNTY
RALEIGH, CITY OF
CARY, TOWN OF TRANSFER STATION
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF RAL-DUR
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
WASTE INDUSTRIES CROSSWINDS PARK T.S.
HOLLY SPRINGS DISPOSAL, INC.
COLONIAL BUILDING CO INC
WAKE STONE CORP-TRIANGLE QUARRY
CURRIN BROTHERS LANDFILL
NC STATE FAIRGROUNDS YW FAG.
ROBUCK LANDFILL
NEUSE DEMO LANDFILL
MASSENGILL & SONS INC
RALEIGH, CITY OF YW FACILITY
MITCHELL DIST CO
ESTES'S EXPRESS LINES
AEROTRON INC
Database(s)
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Raz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
State Haz. Waste
CERCLIS
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
SWF/LF
LUST
LUST
RCRIS-SQG,FINDS,UST
TC111661Q.1p EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
lr,----7\-_-r,.../ -/-;:::::=;=/ :::,,----;;--/-r-,-----ror Jo -/T!/-r7~~-,-\jTT/ (½~"/l. )//~ ~-----i·
I >}_/ /1/ /P f /1 f¥
~f f ) / ) I -J-.
.• __ / / :; -/t, /
I ! . , . /'.;;' ;/ ,,
I-_ -•-/ r ,~~--~ J'---------'-,c LS Of ( _ -
I
I
• Major Roads
• Contour lines (25 foot interval
unless otherwise shown)
-Waterways
.. _,,,,/
I
J
0
I
1/4
I
)
I
Miles
@ -Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater.
®~ -Closest wen according to (F)ederal or (S)tate
database m quadrant.
® • Closest public water supply well.
TARGET PROPERTY: REA Construction CUSTOMER: Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
ADDRESS: 3010 Greshams Lake Road CONTACT: Fred Rash
2
I
CITY/STATE/ZIP: Raleigh NC 27615 INQUIRY#: 1116610.1p
, .__LA_T,_L_o_N_G_: _____ 3_5_.a_a2_0_1 _1a_._sa_s_1 ______ .___D_A_TE_: ___ A_p_ri_1 _Jo_._1_ss_s _________ ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1
U~ ___________ s_u_M_M_A_R_v ______________ __,
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION1
Geologic Code:
Era:
System:
Series:
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT1
Category:
GROUNDWATER FLOW INFORMATION
Pzg2
Paleozoic
Devonian
Middle Paleozoic granitic rocks
Plutonic and Intrusive Rocks
General Topographic Gradient: General East
General Hydrogeologic Gradient no hydrogeologic data available.
Note: In a general way. the water table typically conforms to surface topcgraphy.:;.
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE
Target Property: 2435078-HS WAKE FOREST, NC
FEDERAL DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
WELL
QUADRANT
DISTANCE
FROM TP LITHOLOGY
NO WELLS FOUND
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION (EPA-FROS)
Searched by Nearest Well.
Location Relative to TP:
PWS Name:
1/4 · 1/2 Mile North
ROLAND INDUSTRIAL PK
RALEIGH, NC 27609
Welt currently has or has had major violation(s): No
AREA RADON INFORMATION ·
Zip Code: 27615
Number or sites tested: 6
Area
Uving Area -1st Floor
Uving Area -2nd Floor
Basement
Average Ac1ivity
0.400 pCi/L
Not Reported
Not Reponed
% <4 pCi/l
100%
Not Reported
Not Reported
DEPTH TO
WATER TABLE
%4-20 pCi/l
0%
Not Reported
Nol Reponed
% >20 pCi/L
0%
Not Reported
Not Reported
f S""rt:C PC, Scnruo~ l'l E An>al ,..,g W J II.Ow,~. U"°""1Y al in,, Caor,,n,nw~ US Al I: ~(XI OOOSc.o,,. · A "'91" •"31f"lMIMO> OI N 197~ p II ..,.,9 .one! HU 11,,,~mAn M/,il USUS 0.'l'l,-::,.,,.. S,.,~, 00S · 11 119<).I',
1 US fPi, G,wn<l\'l.olt'rHAnQ-\Jd I GtOU"<IW,111•• .... acontA ............. Onc,-gtA,,,.,..,r,:n--oo .. ,...,,fPt,M~lj,.90,()l~Cll.<Q!,..4,P.,Q<' 7e sec,1-19'¥1
TC11166t0:1P Page3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.•------------
&/ I L.*---1-nd_i_ca_t-es__JT_A_R_G..a~:W· _P_R_O_P_E:..R_TY ____ ::_o'-"u::.......a...------o---'----1/-
4
_____ 1/_2 _________ --l
.. Indicates sites at elevations higher
I than or equal to the target property.
. .
• • Indicates sites at elevations lower
than the target property .
.A. · Coal Gasification Sttes frl requested) I D · National Priority List Sttes
Miles
,t,I · Power transmission lines (USGS .DLG, 1993)
/i! · Oil & Gas pipelines (USGS. DLG, 1993)
I TARGET PROPERTY: REA Construction CUSTOMER: Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
ADDRESS: 3010 Greshams Lake Road CONT ACT: Fred Rash
CITY/STATE/ZIP: Raleigh NC 27615 INQUIRY#: 1116610.lp I L-LA_T_JL_o_N_G_: _____ 35_.a_a_20_1_1_a_.s_a_s1 ______ _,_ __ D_A_TE_: ____ Ap_r_i1 _3_0_. _19_9_s _________ --J
:
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
C "' f ' !i 0 "'
\\,_lA t.AKE RO A AS
c,1-'t-s
GRESHAM • RD
---------
---------·----------
I I '-*---:--ln~d,-ic-at:-e-s-=T::cA~Rc-:G:-:E::T:-:cP-:cR-:cO-:cP-::Ec::R=TY'"'.-....::'..---------o-----'-----
1
-;_
8
_________ 1/J
4 .. Indicates sites at elevations higher
than or equal to the target property.
Indicates sites at elevations lower
than the target property.
-Coal Gasification Sttes (tt requested)
-Sensitive Receptors
Miles
-National Priority List Sttes Jo/ -Power transmission lines (USGS DLG, 1993)
#,J -Oil & Gas pipelines (USGS DLG, 1993)
TARGET PROPERTY: REA Construction CUSTOMER:
ADDRESS: 3010 Greshams Lake Road CONTACT:
CITY/STATE/ZIP: Raleigh NC 27615 INQUIRY #:
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
Fred Rash
1116610.1p
April 30, 1996 I LAT/LONG: 35.8820 / 78.5857 DATE: ·L..._ _______ ___,_ ________ _j
I MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY SHOWING
ALL SITES
I Search
Target Distance Total
I Database Property (Mites) < 1 /8 1/8 · 1/4 1/4-1/2 1 /2 · 1 > 1' . Plotted
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
I Delisted NPL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RCRIS-TSD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State Haz. Waste 1.000 0 0 NR 2
I CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CERC-NFRAP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
I CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State Landfill 0.500 0 0 NR NR
LUST 0.500 0 0 NR NR
I UST X 0.250 NR NR NR 2
RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
I RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
I ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
'
I TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
NPL Liens NR NR ' TP NR NR NR 0
TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
I MLTS TP .NR NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
I Coal Gas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
I TP e Target Property
NR ~ Not Requested at this Search Distance
• Sites may be listed in more than one database
I
I
I
I
I TC1116610.lp Page 6
I
I MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY SHOWING
ONLY SITES HIGHER THAN OR THE SAME ELEVATION AS TP
I Search
Target Distance Total
I Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 · 1/4 1/4 · 1/2 1 /2 · 1 > 1 Plotted
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
I Delisted NPL TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RCRIS-TSD -1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State Haz. Waste 1.000 0 0 NR 2
I CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
CERC-NFRAP TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
I CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
State Landfill 0.500 0 0 NR NR
LUST 0.500 0 0 NR NR
I UST X 0.250 NR NR NR 2
RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
I RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
I PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
I TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
NPL Liens TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
I MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
I CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Coal Gas N/A N/A .N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
I. TP • Target Property
NR • Not Requested al this Search Distance
• Sites may be listed in more than one database
' I
I
I
l TC1116610.1p Page7
I
I ~ MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
I Distance EDA 10 Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA \0 Number
I Coat Gas Site Search: EDA does not presently have coal gas site informatJon availa_ble in this state.
I AS GRESHAM LAKE ASPHALT PLANT UST U001434672
Target 3010 GRESHAM LAKE RD N/A
Propeny RALEIGH, NC 27619
UST:
I Facility ID: 0-005024 Material: Steel
Telephone: [phone] Interior: Unknown
Tank ID: 1 Exterior: Pain1
I
Capacity: 20,000 Piping: Unknown
Date installed: 04/12(71 Tank Leak Det.: Nol reported
Date removed: 05/07/87 Pipe Leak Det.: Nol reported
Status: Permanent Closed Tank Corr. Prot.: Not reported
I
Product: Diesel, Diesel Mixture Pipe Corr. Prot.: Nol reported
Overfill Prat.: Not reported Financial Resp.: Not reported
Chem. AbstractJCercla: Not reported
Certification: Nol reported
I Facility ID: 0-005024 Material: Steel
Telephone: [phone] Interior: Unknown
Tank ID: 2 Exterior: Paint
Capacity: 10,000 Piping: Unkrown
I Date installed: 04/12(71 Tank Leak Oet.: Not reported
Date removed: 05/07-/87 Pipe Leak Det.: Nol reported
Sta1us: Permanent Closed Tank Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Prcxluct Diesel. Diesel Mixture Pipe Corr. Prat.: Not reported
I Overfill Prat.: Nol reported Financial Resp.: Not reported
Chem. Abstract/Cercla: Not reported
Certification: Nol reported
Facility ID: 0-005024 Material: Steel
I Telephone: [phone] Interior: Unknown
Tank ID: 3 Extenor: Paint
Capacity: 500 Piping: Unknown
Date installed: 04/12(71 Tank Leak Det.: Not reported
I Date removed: 05/07/87 Pipe Leak Del.: NOi reported
Status: Permanent Closed Tank Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Product: Gasoline. Gasoline Mixture Pipe Corr. Prat.: Nol reponed
Overfill Prot.: Nol reported Financial Resp.: Not reported
I Chem. AbstractJCercla: Nol reported
Certification: Not reported
Facility ID: 0-005024 Material: Steel
I Telephone: [phone] Interior: Unknown
Tank JD: 4 ExteOOr: Pain1
Capacity: 1,000 Piping: Unknown
Date installed: 04/12(71 Tank Leak Det.: Not reported
I Date removed: 05/07/87 Pipe Leak Oet.: Not reported
Status: Permanent Closed Tank Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Product: Gasoline, Gasoline Mixture Pipe Corr. Prat.: NOi reported
Overfill Prat.: Not reported Financial Resp.: Nol reported
D Chem. Abstract/Cercla: No1 reported
Cenilication: Not reported
I 1 BILLINGS & GARRETT, INC. UST U001435041
ENE 3200 NORTHSIDE DR N/A
< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC 27609
Higher
I TC11t6610.1p Page 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Map ID
Direction
Distance
ij
Elevation Site
BILLINGS & GARRETT, INC.
UST:
Facility ID:
Telephone:
Tank ID:
Capacity:
Date installed:
Date removed:
Status:
Product:
Overfill Prat.:
Chem. AbstracVCercla:
Certification:
Facility ID:
Telephone:
Tank ID:
Capacity:
Date installed:
Date removed:
Status:
Product
Overfill Prat.:
Chem. AbstracVCercla:
Cenilication:
Facility ID:
Telephone:
Tank ID:
Capacity:
Date installed:
Date removed:
Status:
Product
Overfill Prat.:
Chem. AbstracVCercla:
Cenilication:
Facility ID:
Telephone:
Tank ID:
Capacity:
Date installed:
Date removed:
Status:
Product:
Overfill Prat.:
Chem. AbstracVCercla:
Certification:
MAP FINDINGS
EDR 10 Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
(Continued) U001435041
0-005679 Material: Steel
[phone] Interior: Gath. Prat.
1 Exterior: Gath. Prat.
10,000 Pipi[lg: Steel
03/22{18 Tank Leak Det.: Not reported
03/31/91 Pipe Leak Det.: Not reported
Permanent Closed Tank Corr. Prat: Not reported
Gasoline. Gasoline Mixture Pipe Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Not reported Financial Resp.: Not reported
Not repor1ed
Not repor1ed
0-005679 Material: Steel
[phone] Interior: Gath. Prat.
2 Exterior: Calh. Prat.
4,000 Pipi'lg: Steel
03/22{18 TaM Leak Oet.: Not reported
03/31/91 Pipe Leak Det.: Not reported
Permanent Closed Tank Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Diesel, Diesel Mixture Pipe Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Not reported Financial Resp.: Not reported
Not repor1ed
Not reponed
0-005679 Material: Steel
[phone] lntefior: Gath. Prat.
3 Exterior: Gath. Prat.
4,000 Piping: Steel
03/22{18 Tari( Leak Det.: Not reported
03/31/91 Pipe Leak Det.: Not reported
Permanent Closed TaM Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Diesel. Diesel Mixture Pipe Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Nol reported Financial Resp.: Not reported
Nol reponed
Nol reported
0-005679 Material: Steel
[phone] Interior: Gath. Prat.
4 EXlerior: Gath. Prot.
8.000 Piping: Steel
12/31/86 Tani< Leak Del.: Not reported
03/31/91 Pipe Leak Det.: Not reported
Permanent Closed Tank Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Diesel. Diesel Mixture Pipe Corr. Prot.: Not reported
Nol reported Financial Resp.: Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
TC1116610;1P Page9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Site
ij MAP FINDINGS
-----------------------------
BILLINGS & GARRETT, INC. (Continued)
Facility ID: 0-005679 Material: Steel
Telephone: [phone] Interior: Gath. Prot.
Tank 10: 5 Exterior: Gath. Prat.
Capacity: 4.000 Piping: Sleel
Date installed: 12/31/86 Tank Leak Det.: Not reported
Date removed: 03/31/91 Pipe Leak Det.: Not reported
Status: Permanent Closed Tank Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Product: Gasoline, Gasoline Mixture Pipe Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Overfill Prot.: Nol reported Financial Resp.: Not reported
Chem. Abstract/Cercla: Not reported
Certification: Not reported
2 GRESHAMS LAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK
ENE • 3220 NOATHSIDE DR
< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC
Higher
A3 ROWLAND LANDFILL
North 3000 GRESHAM LAKE AD
1/8·1/4 RALEIGH, NC
High-er
A4 ROWLAND DEMO LANDFILL
North 3000 GRESHAM LAKE RD
1/8-1/4 WAKE (County), NC
Higher
6 STAY-RIGHT
NNE 3109 GRESHAM LAKE AD
1/8·1/4 RALEIGH, NC
Higher
EDA 10 Number
Database(s) EPA 10 Number
SHWS
SHWS
SWF/LF
LUST
U001435041
5101425742
N/A
S101425755
N/A
5101429169
N/A
5101573735
N/A
TC1116610.1p Page 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Map ID
Direction
Distance
ij MAP FINDINGS
EDA 10 Number
Elevation Site 0atabase(s) EPA 10 Number
7
ENE
1/8-1/4
Higher
-----------------------
ST A Y-RIGHT (Continued)
LUST:
Facility 10: t 2645 Region: AAL
Date Occurred: 09/28/1993 Submit Date: 08/15/1994
GW Contam: Not reported Soil Contam: Not reported
Incident 0esc: ONE 10:000 GAL DIESEL TANK AND ONE 10:000 GAL GAS TANK PULLED: SOIL
SAMPLE TAKEN FOUND ABOVE DECT:
Owner: STAY-RIGKT TANK CO INC.
Not reported
3109 GRESHAM LAKE RD
RALEIGH, NC 27615
WAKE County
Not reported
Ownership: Private
Material: GAS
Oty Lost Not reponed
Material: DIESEL
Qty Lost: Not reported
Source: Leak•underground
Location: Facility
Site Priority: Not reported
Wells Affected: Not reported
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Not reported
7 .5 Min Quad: Not reported
Last Modified: 12/27/1994
Nov Issued: Not reported
Public Meeting: Not reported
SOC Signed: Not reported
RS Designate: Not reported
WEEKS CONST COMPANY
3312 NORTHSIDE DRIVE
RALEIGH, NC 27609
UST:
Facility ID: 0-026669
Telephone: [phone]
Tank ID: 1
Capacity: 10,000
Date installed: 02/01/83
Date removed: 08/11/92
Status: Permanent Closed
Product: Gasoline, Gasoline Mixture
Overlill P rot.: Not reported
Chem. AbstracVCercta: Not repor1ed
Certification: Not reported
Operation: Commercial
Oty Recovered: Not reported
Oty Recovered: Not reported
Type: Gasoline/diesel
Setting: Urban
Dem Contac,: NILE TESTERMAN
Num Affected: Not reported
Samples Include: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reponed
Incident Phase: Closed Out
45 Day Rprt: Not reported
Corrective Act Not reported
Reclass Rpn: Not reported
Close-out Rpn: 08/04/1994
UST
Material: Steel
Interior: Unknown
Exterior: Calh. Prat.
Piping: Gath. Prat.
Tank Leak Det.: Not reported
Pipe Leak Det.: Not reported
Tank Corr. Prat.: Nol reported
Pipe Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Financial Resp.: Not reported
St01573735
U001438838
N/A
TCtt166t0.tp Pagett
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Site
WEEKS CONST COMPANY
Facility 10:
Telephone:
Tank ID:
Capacity:
Date installed:
Date removed:
Status:
Product:
Overfill Prat.:
Chem. Abstract/Cercla:
Certification:
MAP FINDINGS
EDA ID Numoer
Database{s) EPA 10 Number
(Continued) U001438838
0-026669 Material: Steel
[phone] Interior: Unknown
2 EX1erior: Gath. Prat.
10,000 Piping: Gath. Prat.
02/01/83 Tank Leak Det.: Not reported
08/11/92 Pipe Leak Oet.: Not reported
Permanent Closed Tank Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Diesel. Diesel Mixture Pipe Corr. Prat.: Not reported
Not reported Financial Resp.: Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
TC1116610.1p Page 12
---,. ---.. --------· ---OIWHAN SUMMARY
C11y Eon ID Sile Nmne Sile /\1ldress Zip Dotohnse(s) r-nr.i!ity 10
RALEIGH S101425747 MALLlNKROOT, INCORPORATED HIGHWAY 111 NORTH SHWS
RALEIGH S101425736 BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. US 1 NORTH SHWS
RALEIGH S101425754 RJA/MALLINKROOT HWY 1 NORTH SHWS
RALEIGH $101425764 WESTINGHOUSE ELEC METER & LIGHT US 1 N SHWS
RALEIGH S101425756 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP 3-171-01 nT 3. 62250LDSTAGE ROAD SHWS
RALEIGH $101572192 MITCHELL DIST CO IIWY 54 LUST 8058
RALEIGH $101425758 · SIA WALTER GUN CLUB us 64 SHWS
RALEIGH S1011125841 AUBUnN CHURCH ROAD ORUM AUBURN CHURCH ROAD SHWS
RALEIGH S101425981 RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP BATTLE·BRIOGE AD SR 2552 SIIWS
RALEIGH $101425750 NCDA PESTICIDE LAB STORAGE BLUE RIDGE ROAD SHWS
nALEIGH 1000118758 ESB INC 2510 N BLVD 27604 CERCLIS
nALEIOH S101425749 NC STATE UNIV. (LOT 86 FARM UNIT) CARTER-FINLEY STADIUM SHWS
RALEIGH S101425940 ITT CORPORATION 1208 FRONT ST BLOG K SHWS
RALEIGH s101425763 WARD TRANSFORMER MT. HERMAN CHURCH ROAD SHWS
AALE1GH 1000:J43094 AEROTRON INC USHWY1N 27604 RCR1S-SOG, FINDS, UST 0-005515
RALEIGH S101425939 ITT CORPORATION 3004 INDUSTRIAL DR BOG D SHWS
RALEIGH S101168734 ESTES'S EXPRESS LINES LANGLEY RD. AT HWY 70 LUST 9393
RALEIGH S101425738 CHLORIDE AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES 2539 TIMBER LAKE ROAD SHWS
RALEIGH S101425842 BAKER (MAGGIE) PROPERTY 1209 TRINITY RO SHWS
RALEIGH S101426043 WEATHERSFIELD PLACE CONDOMINIUM 774 WEATHEROREE DRIVE SHWS
WAKE cownY S101429198 W.E. GARRISON COMPANY SWF/LF-
WAKE COUNTY S1D1429199 WAKE COUNTY S. R. 2006 'SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY S100048622 WAKE COUNTY N.C. 55 SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY S100048607 RALEIGH, CITY OF U.S. 64 SWF/LF
WAKE COUtlTY $101428989 CARY, TOWN OF TnANSFER STATION DIXON AVENUE $WF/LF
WAKE COUNTY S100832670 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF RAL-DUR GLOBE ROAD SWF/LF
WAKE COUtHY S\01428983 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. HARRIS PLANT SITE SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY S101823012 WASTE INDUSTRIES CROSSWINDS PARK T.S. JONES SAUSAGE ROAD SWF/LF
WAKE COUtHY S101 429092 HOLLY SPRINGS 01SPOSAL INC. NCSR 1153 SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY S101153782 COLONIAL BUILDING CO INC NORWOOD RO/SR 1834 SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY S101823013 WAKE STONE CORP-TRIANGLE QUARRY 222 ST AA 1.ANE SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY $101429016 CURRIN BROTHERS LANDFILL SUNSET LAKE/SR 1301 SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY $100048,01 NC $TATE FAIROROUNDS VW FAC. TRINITY ROAD SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY $101.-\29165 ROBUCK LANDFILL VICTORY CHURCH AD SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY S\01429138 NEUSE DEMO LANDFILL WAYNE ADAMS THORNTON SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY S101429129 MASSENGILL & SONS INC WIOESPAN DA/SR2558 SWF/LF
WAKE COUNTY S101429157 RALEIGH, CITY OF YW FACILITY WILDER'S GROVE LF SWF/LF
TCl 116610. 1n P;19e 11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GEOCHECK VERSION 2.1
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
PWS SUMMARY:
PWSID:
Date Initiated:
PWS Name:
Addressee/ Facility Type:
Facility Name:
Addressee/ Facility Type:
F~cility Name:
Facility Latitude:
Facility Latitude:
City Served:
Treatment Class:
Searched by Nearest Well.
NC0392510 PWS Status:
June/ t9n Date Deactivated:
ROLAND INDUSTRIAL PK
RALEIGH, NC 27609
System Owner/Responsible Party
ROLAND INDUSTRIAL PK
2820 ROLAND RD
RALEIGH, NC 27609
System Owner/Responsible Party
ROLAND INDUSTRIAL PK
2820 ROLAND RD
RALEIGH, NC 27609
35 46 18
35 53 10
RALEIGH
Untreated
Active
Not Aeponed
Distance tram TP: 1/4 -1/2 Mile
Dir relative to TP: Nonh
Facility Longnude: 078 38 20
Facility Longnude: 078 35 10
Population Served: Under 101 Persons
Well currently has or has had major violation(s): No
TC\116610.lp Page Al
II GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKIN\i I u-[__ __________ _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To maintain currency o! the following federal and state databases. EDA contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis. as required.
Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that this EDA report meets or exceeds the 90-day updating requirement
at the ASTM standard.
FEDERAL ASTM RECORDS:
CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensanon, and Liability Information System
Source: EPNNTIS
Telephone: [phone]
CERCLIS: CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states,
municipalities. private companies and private persons. pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response. Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the
National Priorities liS1 (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase tor possible inclusion
on the NPL
Date of Government Version: 11/30/95
Date Made Active at EDR: 02/26/96
EANS: Emergency Response Notification System
Source: EPNNTIS
Telephone: [phone]
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System.
hazardous substances.
Date or Government Version: 12/31/95
Date Made Active at EDA: 02/19/96
NPL: National Priority List
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Date al Data Arrival at EDR: 01/15/96
Elapsed ASTM days: 42
ERNS records and stores information on reponed releases of oil and '
Date al Data Arrival at EDA: 01/26/96
Elapsed ASTM days: 24
NPL: National Priorities US1 (Supertund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1.200 sites tor priority c!eanup
under the Supertund Progiam. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such. it is EDR's policy to plot NPL
sites greater than approximately 500 acres in size as areas (polygons). Sites smaller in size are point-geocoded al the
site·s address.
Date of Government Version: 09/01/95
Date Made Active at EDA: 10/25/95
RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery lntormation System
Source: EPNNTIS
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 1 Oft 7/95
Elapsed ASTM days: 8
Telephone: [phone]
RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery 1~tormation System. RCRIS includes selective information on sites which
generate. transpon, store. treat and/or dispose al hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA).
Date al Government Version: 10/31/95
Date Made Act,ve at EDR: 01/12/96
Date al Data Arrival at EDR: 12/15/95
Elapsed ASTM days: 28
TC1116610.1p Page A2
II GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENc.;Y -1 KAt.;KINl.:i I U-\._ __________ _________,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FEDERAL NON-ASTM RECORDS:
CONSENT: Superfund {CEACLA) Consenl Decrees
Source: EPA Regional Offices
Telephone: Varies
Major legal senlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Supertund) sites. Released periodically
by United States District Couns atter senlement by panies to litiganon maners. -
Date at Government Version: Varies
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Repon
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Date ol Next Scheduled Update: 09/01/95
COARACTS: CORRACTS identities hazardous waste handlers with AGRA corrective action activity.
Date ct Government Version: 04/10/95
FINDS: Facility Index System
Source: EPNNTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Date ol Next Scheduled Update: 06/17/96
FINDS: Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ~pointers~ to other sources that contain more
detail. These include: RCRIS. PCS {Permit Compliance System). AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System),
FATES (FIFRA !Federal lnsec1icide Fungicide Rodenticide ActJ and TSCA Enlorcement Sys,em. FTTS (FIFRA{TSCA
Tracking System]), CERCUS. DOCKET {Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes). FURS {Federal Underground Injection Control), FROS (Federal
Reporting Data System), SIA (Surface Impoundments). CICIS (TSCA Chemicals in Commerce lnlonnation System),
PADS, RCAA·J (medical waste transporters/disposers), TRIS and TSCA.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/95
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials tnlormation Reporting System
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: 202·366·4555
Date ol Next Scheduled Update: 07/08/96
HMIAS: Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date al Government Version: 12/31/95
ML TS: Material Licensing Tracking System
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: 301·415-7169
Da1e ol Next Scheduled Update: 07/29/96
ML TS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list at approximalely 8,100 sites which possess or
use radioactive ma1erials and which are subject 10 NAC licensing requirements. To maintain currency. EDA contacts the Agency
on a quarterly basis.
Date al Governmenl Version: 08/01/95
NPL LIENS: Federal Supertund Liens
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Date ol Next Scheduled Upda1e: 07/15/96
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the US EPA by the ComprehenSive Environmental
Response. Compensation and Liability Act (CEACLA) of 1980. thf; USEPA has the authority to file liens against real
property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification or potential
liability. USEPA compiles a listing al filed notices of Supertund Liens.
Date al Governmenl Version: 10/15/91
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Dale ol Next Scheduled Update: 08/26/96
. ' PADS: PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators. transporters. commercial starers and/or brokers and disposers
of PC B's who are required to notify the EPA al such activities.
Date at Government Version: 10/14/94 Date ol Nex1 Scheduled Update: 08/19/96
TC1116610.1p PageA3
II GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACKING I UL__ _________ _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
RAATS: AGAA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued
under AGRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA.
Date ot Government Version: 04/17/95
ROD: Records 01 Decision
Source: NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Next Scheduled Update: 06/17/96
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and
health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/95
JRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Next Scheduled Update: 06/17/96
TRIS: Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land
in reportable quantities under SARA Tltle Ill Section 313.
Date or Government Version: 12/31/92
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Date ot NeXl Scheduled Update: 07/01/96
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and imponers al chemical substances included on
the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site. USEPA has no current plan to update and/or re-issue this database.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/95 Date ot Next Scheduled Update: 06/17/96
TCt 116610.1p Page A4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA (;UHHt:Nl,;Y I HAl.,1\.11'41.:1
ST ATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ASTM RECORDS:
LUST: Incidents Management Database
Source: Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
LUST: Leaking Underg~ound Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory al reported leaking
underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records. and the inlormatian stored varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 01/05/96
Date Made Active at EDA: 02/26/96
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Source: Department of Environment. Health & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Data Arrival at EDA: 01/30/96
Elapsed ASTM days: 27
SHWS: State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CEACLIS. These
sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent ol Superfund) are identified along with sites where deanup will be paid tor by potentially responsible ,
parties. Available inlormation varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 03/15/95
Da1e Made Ac1ive at EDA: 06/12/95
SWF/LF: Ust of Solid Waste Facility
Source: Department ol Environment. Health & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 05/t 1/95
Elapsed ASTM days: 32
SWF/LF: Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type recqrds typically contain an inventory or solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps
that tailed to meet AGRA Section 2004 criteria tor solid waste landfills or disposal sites.
Date at Government Version: 02/12/96
Date Made Ac1ive at EDA: 03/15/96
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Source: Department of Environment. Health & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Date al Data Arrival at EDA: 02/20/96
Elapsed ASTM days: 24
UST: Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I or the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act {AGAA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program.
Available information varies by state program. '
Date of Government Version: 07/15/95
Date Made Active at EDA: 09/05/95
Historical and Other Database(s)
Date of Data Arrival at EDA: 08/04/95
Elapsed ASTM days: 32
Depending on the geographic area covered by this repon, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example. the existence of wetlands information data in a specific repon does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarpy
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
TC1116610.1p Page AS
I ~ GOVERNMENTRECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRAt.;K.INl:i
'--~-----'-'---"-~--'-----'-------'-------'-------"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Fonner Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites: The exiS1ence and location of Coal Gas sites is provided exclusively to
EDR by Real Property Scan, Inc. <£:copyright 1993 Real Property Scan, Inc._. For a technical description of the types
of hazards which may be found at such sites. contact your EDA customer service representative.
Disclaimer Provided by Real Property Scart, Inc.
The information contained in this report has predominantly been obtained from publicly available sources produced by entities
other than Real Property Scan. While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy al this repon, Real Property
Scan does not guarantee the accuracy of this report. Any liability on the part al Real Property Scan is strictly limited to a refund
of the amount paid. No daim is made !or the actual existence of toxins at any site. This repon does not constitute a legal
opinion.
DELISTED NPL: Delisted NPL Sites
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
DELISTEO NPL: The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that
the EPA uses to delete sites tram the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFA 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL
where no further response is appropriate. ·
NFRAP: No Further Remedial Actlon Planned
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
NFRAP: As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated •No Further Remedial Action Planned• (NFRAP) have been
removed from CERCUS. NFAAP sites may be sites where, tallowing an initial investigation, no contamination was found,
contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL. or the contamination was not
serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately 25.000 NFRAP
sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them as historical records
so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future. This policy change is pan of the EPA's Brownfields
Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens to promote economic redevelop~ent
of unproductive urban sites.
FROS: Federal Reporting Data System
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
FROS provides inlormation regarding public water supplies and their compliance with monitoring requirements. maximum
contaminant levels (MCL's). and other requirements of the Sale Drinking Water Act of 1986.
Area Radon Information: The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The
study covers the years 1986. 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private so~rces
such as universities and research institutions.
011/Gas Pipelines/Electrical Transmission Lines: This data was obtained by EDA from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by
USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1 :100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category incli.Jding
some oil, but primarily gas pipelines and electrical transmission lines.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals who. due to their fragile immune systems. are deemed to be especially sensitive to
environmental discharges. These typically include the elderly. the sick. and children. While the exact location al these sensitive
receptors cannot be determined. EDA indicates those facilities. such as schools. hospitals. day care centers. and nursing homes,
where sensitive receptors are likely to be located. ·
USGS Water Wells: In November 1971 the United State~ Geological Survey (USGS) implemented a national water resource
information tracking system. This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has _collected
data on sur1ace water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data indudes information on more than 900.000 wells. springs. and
other sources of groundwater.
Flood Zone Data: This data. available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDA in 1994 tram the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
TC1116610.1p Page A6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACK.INl:i
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Water Dams: National Inventory of Dams
Source: Federal Emergency Management Agenct
Telephone: [phone]
WATER DAMS: National computer database al more than 74,000 dams main_tained by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
TC1116610.1p PageA7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXD
BORING LOGS AND WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAMS
g:\aprojcct\ncdot\nc0360.042\repxt\rcport2.doc\13·M•y-97
GERAGHTY 61' MILLER. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project : North Carolina Deportment of Tronsporlotion
Project Location: Sile #29 -Raleigh, Norih Carolina
Project Number : NC0360.041
MONITOR WELL MW-1
WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM AND
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Dote(s) g 25 gs Logged MPD Checked ~ f-!D"-r'"ill,cede_ __ -__ -__________ -+_;,B"cc---=----------------+8~-,-,----,-----------l ~ Drilling Drill Bit Top of Cosing
<i r.Mc'e:ct""ho,,dc__H_o_11_ow __ s_te_m_A_u_g=.e_r _____ -+-':Sc';z':ceL./T:.,Y"'P.:c.e ____________ -+E='l"'ev:.::a.:.:tio,::n'---',('-'ft__:m=sl1-) -------+
Drill Rig Drilled Total Depth 0::: Type Pump By Groundwater Protection Drilled {ft bis) 35
~f-,G-'-r~ou_n_d_w_a_te-,-~---,~,r~,.,--.,.,:~o~m~p"'le~b~o~n~:'4'H~o~u~rs:-t-:=N~u-m7b-er-~:-
0
.----~,U--.-----+S~a~m~p=-,e~,~='-------------l
g; 1--"L~ev~e-'--I =ft--""b'"-''-~-~~•---~•---+-"-f _S_a_m-'--p_le_s ~• _,_,t_u_rb_e_d:_NA_:~n_d,_st_u_rb_e_d_: _NA_+T-'-yp'-'e'------------l
Type of Screen Diameter of
Hole inches 8
: Diameter of
1 Well inches I 2 Well Casin 2", Sch. 40 Perforation 0.01 0-Slot
0 's' 0 oc a. a. <
"' 0 w "' u w
0
6 z
Type of
Sand Pock
Comments
5
~ 10 oc 0
~ 0
0 u z
o 15 z
'j
C:
~ 0
0 8 20 u z
0 z
"' g:
0 z ,,,
25
SAMPLES
~
.:::::_
"' • 0
CD
u
"' 0 0
JC "' :-=o _, _,
~~-=~
-cf:.~
~·-~~
£.-.J>
-.. _.
Type/Thickness of Seal s Bentonite Pellets/2-fi
LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
GRAVEL, BROWN SILTY SAND FILL.
GREY GRAVEL, SIL TY SANO.
GREY GRAVEL, SIL TY SANO FILL.
FILL ENDS AT 5-FT.
TIGHT CLAY. REDOISH BROWN. FINE GRAVEL,
SANOY CLAY WITH SOME GRAVELS ANO SILT (75% ,
CLAY (22%). SAND (3%), GRAVEL.
SANOY SILT (85%), CLAY ( 15%), GRAVEL.
RED SANOY SILT.
WHITE SILT SANO.
WHITE CRUSHED ROCK CRYSTALLINE.
BROWN SILTY SAND (90%). SAND (5%), CLAY (5%)
ORANGE SILTY CLAY WITH GRAVEL, SILTY (70%).
CLAY (24%), GRAVEL (1%).
SIL TY CLAY, DARK BROWN.
SILT (90%). CLAY {10%), MICA FLAKES
CRYSTALLINE ROCK AT 18'.
BROWN SILT MICA FLAKES WHITE/BROWN SANO
FINE {95%), SANO {5%), CLAY.
RED BROWN SILTY CLAY (95%), SILT ( I 0%).
CLAY (5%). FINE SANO.
WHITE CRYSTALLINE ROCK LENSE.
WEATHERED ROCK ANO GRAVEL.
GREY SANDY SILT {90%) SILT {10?.) SANO.
RED BROWN SILTY SAND (95%), SILT (5%), SAND.
RED BROWN SILTY SANO (95%). SILT (5%), CLAY.
GREY BROWN SILTY SAND (95%), SILT ( <5%), SAN
RED BROWN SILTY SAND (95%), SILT (5%). SANO
WATER AT 27'.
RED BROWN SANDY SILT (50%), FINE SANDS
(50%), SILT OAMP.
\@ 30
0 '---------$GERAGHTY & MILLER INC.
Well Construction
Details
' • •
' • •
' V
•
' V
•
•
' V
REMARKS
L.-.---1-Portlond/Bentonite
Cement Grout
'
,._.. __ .,_ 2" Dia., Sch. 40
Well Cosing
• 1----+ 8" Dia. Drilled
Hole
•
'
'
'
'
'
'
..,_ _ _,_ ,2" Dia., Sch. 40,
0.010-Slot Well
Screen
-1---+ 20,30 Sond f;lter
Pack
Sheet 1 of 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"' Q'. " " <i
ii w ~ ~ < Q'. 0 -
ci ~ 0 Q'. 0. 0. < -
Q'. w " Q'. w <D ::; ~
~
ci w ~ u w I u -
"'
,:; z !le < "' 0 -
~ 0
0 u z ..
ci z
w J
C: -
:;
0
0 "' n
0 u z
ci z
~ u ,
Q'. 0. -
"' m > 0 z ::'
,;_j
,
" " 0 -
Project: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Location , Site #29 -Raleigh, North Corolina
Project Number , NC0360.041
Dote(s) 9-25-96 Logged MPO Drilled g ..
Drilling Drill Bit
Method Hollow Stem Auger Size/Type
Drill Rig Drilled
Type Pump By Groundwater
r irst , Completion iL4 Hours Number 1 • Groundwater ' Level (ft bis' ' ' ' of Samples :Disturbed: ' ' '
MONITOR WELL MW-1
WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM AND
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Checked B,
Top of Cosing
Elevation (ft msl) .
Protection Total Deftth Drilled ( t bis) 35
' Sampler NA : Undisturbed: NA Type -Screen Diameter of : Diameter of Type of 2". Hole (inches) B 1 Well (inches) 2 Well Cosinn Sch. 40 Perforation 0.010-Slot
Type of Type/T~/~)kness .
Sand Pack of Seal s Bentonite Peflets/2-ft
Comments
SAMPLES Well Construe lion C 0 u LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION Details
.cw :..:; vi '-c,, REMARKS a.:o !; E v-- 0 0 0. > w V V E i; ' 0 o::: w:: 2 .c c,, o-;':'.'.0 Ill C w _, _, 30 ---WET. RED SAND, SILT. -·.· ----RED BROWN SILTY SAND. --· ,.....::...... .. -----. ---.·.-------------.---WET SAND & SILT. -.-. Total Depth of ~ -.......,.,...., __ Borehole @ 35.0' 35 ---TOTAL OEPTH OF BOREHOLE. --
. -
--
--
--
40 --
. -
. -
--
--
45 --
--
--
--
--
50 --
--
--
--
--
55 --
----
----
60 -Sheet 2 of 2
~:" GERAGHTY MILLER & INC. -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Project : North Carolina Deportment of Transportation
Project Location : Site #29 -Raleigh, North Carolina
Project Number , NC0360.041
MONITOR WELL MW-2
WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM AND
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Oote(s} 9-26-96 Drilled o' < Drilling ;: Hollow Stem Auger Method .,.
Drill Rig <r Type Pump w ~ First : 1..,omplet1on :L4 ~ Groundwater ' < ' 0: Level (ft bis) ' ' ' 0 -Diame/er of:, : Diameter of
Hole inches 8 !Well (inches) 2
Type of
Sand Pock
Comments
o SAMPLES ~ ,Q_ .~ cc: .Cf/l _.I(} ...... O'I t a_:o g E ~ O '---o < V V a.~ lfl Q
Logg.ed Bv MPD
Drill Bit
Size/Type
Drilled
By Groundwater Protection
Hours Number : . ' of Samples , Disturbed: NA \ Undisturbed: NA
Type of 2", Well Casino Sch. 40
Type/Tlr{kness of Seal s) Bentonite Pellets/2-ft
LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION
Checked
Bv
Top of Cosing
Elevation (ft ms/)
T otol Deth Drilled ( I bis} 35
Sampler
Type
Screen
Perforation 0.010-Slot
Welt Construction
Details
REMARKS
Cl:::'. W:::: E <1> ~ .i::. CT' ei 1---'--'--1 a :g ffi :J _3 ~~~~----, Cone rete Pod
~ 0 l--i---+o,,...--.rl---------------------+-~rt--+T"--+----------1 ill •·. · BROWN SAND GRAVEL FILL. +---+ Portlond/Bentonite
::1: .·~. :: Cement Grout ~ :"-.~-.~-
" 0 w
6 w I u
.,
0 z ,.
< 0: 0
~
0 0 u z
0 z
w J C:
:;
0 0 "' ,,,
0 u z
0 z
~ u ~ 0: a.
"' "' > 0 z ::?
"' ;:
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
. ~-~:o.
-~-~-,.
',t;)_. '':.
4' STARTING A REDDISH BROWN CLAY.
BROWN OUYE SAND GRAVEL.
RED BROWN CLAY.
RED BROWN CLAY SILT 80-20.
BROWN CLAY SILT 80-20.
CLAY GRAVEL 80-20, WHITE GRAVEL @ 10.0·.
REDDISH BROWN CLAY SILT 50-50.
CHANGE TO DARK BROWN SILT @ 12.0'.
REDDISH BROWN CLAY SILT 40-60. A LOT OF
MICA FLAKES ..
RED BROWN CLAY SILT WITH GRAVEL.
CRYSTAL GRAVEL LAYER. BROWN SILTY SAND 90-40.
RUST COLORED SILTY SANO 90-10.
VERY FINE SANDS.
BROWN SILT SAND 95-5. MICA FLAKES. ;-t~ ORANGE SILTY CLAY 95-5.
BROWN SILTY SANO, MICA FLAKES 95-5.
GRAVEL LAYER @ 21 .5'.
BROWN SILT SANO. MICA FLAKES 95-5.
LIGHT GRAVEL LAYER.
GRAVEL LAYERS. WATER 25.5'.
WHITE GREY SANOY SILT 65-35.
WHITE GREY SANDY SILT 75-25.
WET AT 27.0'.
WET AT 28.0'. GREY SANDY SILT 95-5.
29.0' DARK BROWN SILT STRIATIONS (90%}, SILT.
-s-3-.a> MICA FLAKES, SILT BROWN (100%}.
'---------,$ GERAGHTY & MILLER INC.
• • ' • •
•
•
• ' • •
'
/\
I
/
H---+ 2" Dia., Sch. 40
We!! Cosing
•
•
'
•
• • •
t---+ 8" Dia. Drilled
Hole
~I :-+--+ Bentonite Seal ' ii
·-t---t-2" Dia., Sch. 40,
0.010-Slot Well
Screen
-+---+ 20,30 Sand Filter
Pack
Sheet 1 of 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
<i' < ~
.;
<i le ... < "' 0 -
c '!;!
0 "' a. a. < -"' w " "' w "' :,
g'
" c w "' u w I u -
" .,
0 z ;, < "' 0 -
~
0 0 u z
0 z
w J C: -
;;:
0 0 "' ,,,
0 u z
0 z
~ u ,
"' a. -
"' "' > 0 z ::'
·;
" • 0 -
Project : North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Location , Site #29 -Raleigh, North Carolina
Project Number : NC0360.041
Dote(s) 9-26-96 Logged MPD Drilled B"
Drilling Drill Bit Hollow Stem Auger Size/Tvpe Method
MONITOR WELL MW-2
WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM AND
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Checked Bv
Top of Cosing
Elevation (ft msl)
Drill Rig Drilled
Type Pump By Groundwater Protection, Total Dewh Drilled ( t bis) 35
r 1rst , L.omplet1on iL4 Hours ' Sampler Groundwater ' Number : .
Level (ft bis) ' ' ' of Samples 'Disturbed: NA : Undisturbed: NA Type ' ' '
Type of Screen Diameter of : Diameter of 2", Hole (inches) 8 1 Well (inches) 2 Well Casino Sch. 40 Perforation 0.01 o~s1ot
Type of Type/Thi~rness Bentonite Pellets/2-ft Sand Pock of Seal s
Comments
C SAMPLES . Well Construction
0 _;> LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION Details :..:::;v; -.c ~ '--"' . REMARKS ~ E " -Q.15 -0 0
" " a.~ ~ 0 O::'. GJ::: E " • .c "' o-0 :-:: 0 (/) C ii5 .J .J 30 -X -t'-1£. SILT BROWN ( 100%). If--MICA FLAKES, ..
--. f---.~.,
~ GRAVEL ROCK LAYER AT 31.5'. ._.._ _-
---. f--
X -a. 4 GRAVEL. ,·f--~ o'! GREY SAND SILT WITH ---~~ ... .!. -. f--
GREY SANO SILT WITH GRAVEL. WET. ,f--Total Depth of - --TOTAL DEPTH OF BOREHOLE. -,f----34.5' Borehole @ -. --35 --
--
--
--
--
40 --' --
--
--
--
45 --
--
--
--
--
50 --
--
--
--
--
' 55 --
--
--
--
--
60 -Sheet 2 of 2 J'f GERAGHTY & MILLER INC. -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"' "' ~
-,'
Ii' le u. < "' 0 -
0 '!/ 0 "' 0. 0. < -
"' w " "' w CD :, er ~
"' c w "' u w :I: u -
6 z ,.
< "' 0 -
~ 0 0 '-' z
ci z
w J
C: -
;
0 d ~ ,,,
0 '-' z
d z
~ u ~ "' 0. -
~ a, > 0 z ::'
~
0 -
Project: North Carolina Department of Transportation MONrfOR WELL MW-3
Project Location : Site #29 -Raleigh, North Carolina WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM AND
Project Number : NC0360.041 LITI-lOLOGIC LOG
Oate(s). 9-25-96 Logged MPD Checked
Drilled Bv B·•
Drilling Hollow Stem Auger Drill Bit Top of Cosing
Method Size/Type Elevation (ft msl)
Drill Rig Drilled Total Dewh
Type Pump By Groundwater Protection Drilled ( t bis) 34
t-1rst , completion --:-Z4 Hours Groun1~ater:) ' Number : . ' Sampler ' ' ' . Samples I Disturbed: NA [Undisturbed: NA Level ft bis ' ' ' of Type
Diameter of
Hole finches) 8 : Diameter of
'Well finches) 2 Type of
Well Casino 2". Sch. 40 Screen
Perforation 0.010-'Slot
Type of
Sand Pock Type/Th!:~rness of Seal s Bentonite Pellets/2-ft
Comments
C . SAMPLES Well Construction
0 u DESCRIPTION Details
.c"' :.::;"in -·;;, LITHOLOGIC !; E "' -'-REMARKS 0.2i .. Q_ ~ 0
"' " "' 0 o::: w;::: E " ~ .c "' 0 o-~.3 Concrete Pad Vl C m -o-~ f'~ .. ASPHALT. GREY SANDY GRAVEL FILL. Portia nd /Bentonite --:, Cement Grout OLIVE SAND GRAVEL. .. •• --i,/ ,.; X --RED SILTY CLAY (50%). ·.· 1..-._. • -:...:....-:-....= -. 2" Dia., Sch. 40 ·-·-I----· RED SILTY CLAY, HARD AT 4.0'. •:, Well Cosing -~ w, -• ..
~ OLIVE SANDS AND GRAVEL FILL. ,,::· . ~ 5--,:
~ ;o,-·o OLIVE SANDS AND GRAVEL FILL. 8" Dia. Drilled
-~ -:·, Hole ~~ BROWN SILTY SAND. .. b;
-::~{ -i' ,.;
BROWN SILTY SAND. • --§ -
6 ~-.:o--CLAY (75%). SILT (20%). GRAVELS (5%). \ -~~ -.. ••
TIGHT RED BROWN CLAY SILT WITH GRAVEL. i>'" .
10 -~ -• X RED BROWN CLAY SILT 60-40. -~ -,·
WHITE GRAVEL ROCK CRYSTALLINE. b; ..
---;,:: .;
X ,.,.":,'.; ·. SANDY LENS£ AT 13.0', BROWN. • .. :",, -\. ,c::" -
~:~.·~~ SILTY SAND (75%). GRAVEL (5%). ---,·. ••
X ;_:·._:'·"c BROWN SILTY SAND (50%) • .
15 --,: ... .. _.·_; ~;_-:~:-i WITH GRAVEL TO FINE GRAVEL. -'---'• X 1..-.--RED BROWN SILTY CLAY (75%). b; i=-:.,..-~ ..
-. .....:_~ -;,::· . . . 17.5' DARK BROWN SILTY SAND (85%). .. _.·_; -'--l;::f -
X RED BROWN SILTY SAND (607.). :. ,,:; --_;-(...,;.: -,·
~-4 20.0· WHITE GRAVEL CRUSHED ROCK. ~ i-. ·_.
20 -'---\ ,,
X I----· RED BROWN SILTY CLAY (857.). I ·-·-Bentonite Seal
-~.....:_-:---~ -~ ' ~·-· ~ ~ ROCK AND GRAVEL LAYERS, WHITE CRYSTAL. -'---. ·; .
X -.. -BROWN SILTY SAND (95%). .. -. --:....: .--: -2" Dia .• Sch. 40, ·-.·.~·;. &~t" 24.0' WHITE GRAVEL LENSE. 0.010-Slot Well -'--~ -'.I--,.
¾ -2::::,j_-: .· ...__ ~ . Screen
25 -1:..::.~ WATER AT 25.0'. RED BROWN SILTY SAND. ---------, .. '
!~:.·~.:~--GREY BROWN SILT ( 100%}. :':------
---"\·.~·::
X ._, :-. .-~ GREY OLIVE SILTY SAND (95%). :-·•; 20,30 Sand Filter ----.::-.=:. .. -. WET MICA FLAKES. SILT. :~·---· Pack -.. ---.;.,;..=....;.. -·\•-·-·
X -(.;;·":":' SILTY SANO, WET, BROWN OLIVE GRAVEL AT 29.0', -~:-,..: ~, -.. -. MICA FLAKES . -·--;-•--:: .::_: ~-·~:::-: 30 . -
A'r GERAGHTY Sheet 1 of 2 & MILLER INC.
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"' "' < "' <
" le! "-< "' 0 -
6 ',!/ 0 "' 0. 0. < -"' w '-' "' w a,
" 0: ~
"" 6 w "' (.) w I (.) -
';
.::; z lia < "' 0 -
~ 0 0 (.) z
d z
w ~ C: -
:;;:
0 0 <O ,,,
0 (.) z
0 z
~ (.) ,
"' 0. -
<O 0, > 0 z ::'
.
\E 0 -
Project: North Carolina Deportment of Tronsporlolion MONITOR WELL MW-3
Project Location , Site #29 -Raleigh, North Carolina WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM AND
Project Number : NC0360.041 LITHOLOGIC LOG
Dote(s) 9-25-96 Logged MPD Checked
Drilled Bv Bv
Drilling Drill Bit Top of Cosing
Method Hollow Stem Auger Size/Tvpe Elevation -(ft msl)
Drill Rig Drilled Total Deth
Type Pump By Groundwater Protection Or;lled ( I bis) 34
Frrst i Completion i24 Hours Number : . ~ Sampler Groundwater ' ' ' . . . NA :undisturbed: NA Level (ft bis) ' ' ' of Samples i Disturbed: Type
Oiome,ter of,\
Hole inches 8 : Diom7ter o~ \ 'Well inches 2 Type of
Well Casino 2", Sch. 40 Screen Perforation 0.010-Slot
Type of Type/T~i~fness Benfonite Pellets/2-ft Sand Pack of Seal s
Comments
SAMPLES Well Construction C
0 .~ LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION Details
:.:;~ -.c"' '-"' REMARKS Q_]l g E ., --0 0 ., ., a.~ "' 0 Cl;:'. w:: E " "' .c "' o-0 :-=o Vl C ai ...J ...J 30 -X -· -. -. BROWN OLIVE SIL TY SANO. :-.--·· --.. -~ ·-·-:·· -. ',:-:'_:: -.. -32.0' PINK CRYSTAL SILT SAND. --~ -:·.--.. :·
X ~. ~ GRAVEL, PINK CRYSTAL. SILT SAND. ---::, 0~ --,,:·,_ Total Depth of --SILTY SAND, DARK BROWN (75%). WET. ;.':,----:77"--::: Borehole @ 34.0' --_:_::_ -TOTAL DEPTH OF BOREHOLE.
35 --
--
--
--
--
40 --
--
--
--
--
45 --
--
--
--
--
50 --
--
--
--
--
55 --
--
--
----
60 -Sheet 2 of 2 A1' GERAGHTY & MILLER INC.