NCD981023260_20030908_Potters Septic Tank Service Pits_FRBCERCLA RA_Remedial Action 1990 - 2003-OCR

NORTII CAROLINA • • · .,
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
MICHAEL F. EASLEY, GO\'ERNOR
WILLIAM G. Ross, JR., SECRETARY
DEXTER R. MATrHEWS, D11rncTOR
Ms. Beverly Hudson
08 September 2003
Superfund Branch, Waste Management Division
US EPA Region IV
6 I Forsyth Street. SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
SUBJECT: Comments on draft Remedial Action Report (September 2003)
Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits
Sandy Creek, Brunswick County
Dear Ms. Hudson,
The State of North Carolina has reviewed the draft Remedial Action Report dated
September 2003 and received by the Division on 03 September 2003 for the Potter's Septic Tank
Service Pits Superfund site. The following comments are offered:
I. Section 1.2, page 3: Please expand on the description of the site. For example, what
happened between 1976 and 1983? Please list the number of residents within Sandy
Creek and the number of private drinking water wells, an estimate will suffice.
2. Table 2-3: Please highlight any violations of the standards. Also please list the cleanup
goals established in the Record of Decision (Table 2-1) in a column along with the
Federal MCL, PRG, and NC 2L values.
3. Section 4.0, page 43: Please add to the chronology of events the dates the soil remediation
stopped and an amended ROD was signed.
4. Section 5.3, page 45: Please add Nile Testerman as the case officer for North Carolina.
5. Figures: It would be helpful if isoconcentration maps of the chemicals of concern in the
ROD (benzene, ethylbenzene, naphthalene, and the trimethlybenzenes) were drawn to
show the extent of contamination.
1646 MAIL SERVICE CEl',TER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLl!'.A 27699-1646
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE: [phone] \ FAX: [phone]
A:-..· EQliAL 01'PORru~1n·/An1R.\lATI\'E ACTID~ EMPLOYER. 50% REC\'CLED/lO'ic--POST•CO!'.'SUMER PAl'I-:R
• •
If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 919 733-280 I, extension 350.
Sincerely,
,:;;<J~J::2:41
Nile P. Testerman, PE
Federal Remediation Branch
Superfund Section
Mar-12-02 12: 11pm Fram-North ~uperfund • ,;oi ss1 ma • i-2,:
~-
BLACK& VEATCH
1145 Sanctuary Par~.way
Suite 475
Alplarena, Georgia 3000<
Tel: [phone]
F": [phone]
US EPA Region rv
Poner' s Pi ts
Ms. Beverly Hudson
Remedial l?roject Manager
US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4
61 Forsy1h Street, 11 ,h Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Subject:
Dear Ms. Hudson:
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
BVSPC Project 48 l 43.14 l
BVSPC File C.3
March 11, 2002
Final Remedial Action Field Study Plan for
the Poner's Pits Site, Sandy Creek, North
Carolina
Enclosed please find the Final Field Study Plan for Remedial Action well installation and
monitoring at the Potter's Pits Superfond site, Comments provided by \Villaim O'Steen at yout
office have been incorporated into the docwneni.
If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call me at [phone].
a_jg
Enclosures
cc: Roben Stem, EPA PO
Charles Hayes, EPA CO
Sincerely,
Black & Veatch Special Project Corp.
Project N anager
Harvey Coppage, BVSPC w/o enclosure
the imagine • build cornpany'"
Mar-11-01 11: 11pm
FINAL
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
VOLUME 2 -FIELD SAMPLING PLAN
REMEDIAL ACTION
POTTERS PITS SITE
T-1,S P 004/034 F-629
SANDY CREEK, BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Mar-12-02 12: I ipm From-North Sifund [phone]i •
FINAL
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
VOLUME 2 -FIELD SAMPLING PLAN
REMEDIAL ACTION
POTTERS PITS SITE
T-295 P 005/034 F-629
SANDY CREEK, BRUNSWICK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
USEPA Work Assignment 043-RARA-04C4
BVSPC Project No. 48143
March 11, 2002
Prepared by
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.
1145 Sanctuary Parkway, Suite 475
Atlanta, Georgia 30004
l\ar-11-01 11 : I 7 pm from-North Siiund H04 561 8788 T-1i5 P 00&/031 f-619 •
Field Snmpling Pinn Section: TOC
Revision No.; J
Revi~ion Di'.Jic: MilrCh l l, 2002
Pno1:-J of3
EPA Conrroc< No. 68-W-99-03
Work A.ssignmcm No. 042-RARA-04C4
?outrs Pits Site
Table of Contents
~~ 1.0 lntroducnon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
l.1 Location oftl1e Potter's Pits Site ................................... 1-1
l.2 Description of the Potter's Pits Site ................... ,... 1-1
1.3 Operational History of the Potter's Pits Site .............. , . , .. , 1-3
1. 4 Regulatory History of the Potter's Pits Site ....... , . , ... , , . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3
1.5 Nature and Extent of Contamination at the Potter's Pits Site , , , .. , .. , . 1-6
1.5.1 Local Contamination Sources ............ , 1-6
1.5.2 Potter's Pits Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-6
2.0 Investigation Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
3.0 Investigation Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
3 .1 Monitoring Well Installation/Sampling Investigation 3-1
3.1.1 Groundwater Sampling ................. , . 3-1
3.1.2 Groundwater Level Measurements ............................ 3-1
3.1.3 Container Require1:nents and Sampling QA/QC . . . . . . 3-4
3.2.4 Surveying ............... ·. . . . . . . . . . . 3-4
3.2 IDW Disposal .................. _. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4
4.0 Sample Designation ................................................ 4-1
4.1 Monitoring Well Sample Designation History ............ , . , , , , , , , _ .. 4-1
4.2 Sample Numbering _ ......................... _ ... _ .............. 4-1
5.0 Investigation Procedmes and Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. , . , , , , 5-1
5, l Sul11111ary of Sampling Program._ .. _, .... , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , . , . _. . . 5-l
5.2 Groundwater Investigation ......... ,,.,,,,, ................ ,,,,.. 5-l
5.2.l Monitoring Well Construction and Completion .................. 5-2
5.2.2 Monitoring Well Development .... , . , .. , ............... , , , , _. 5-6
5.4.3 Monitoring Well Purging ....................... _ . 5-7
5.2.4 Groundwater Level Measurements . . 5-8
5.4.5 Groundwater Sampling . . . . . 5-8
5.4.6 Surveying .... , ...... , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 5-9
5.5 Decontamination Procedures . . . . . . 5-9
Mar-11-01 11: 11pm +404 561 ma • T-19! P.007/034 F-61i
Ficld Sllmpling Plllrl
EPA Conm1ct No. 68-W-99-03
Secrion: TOC
Revision No.: 1
Revi,;ion Date: March 11. 2002
PJgc 2 of 3
Work Assignment No. 042-RAR.A-04C4
Potters Pits Si::
Table of Contents (Continued)
6.0 Sampling Handling and Analyses ...................................... 6-1
6. I Sample Containment and Preservation .............................. 6-1
6.2 Sample Collection Documentation ................................. 6-i
6.2. l Field Operations Records . . . . . . ................ 6-1
6.2.2 Sample Custody Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4
7.0 Investigation-Derived Wastes .................... . 7-1
8.0 Field Activities Schedule 8-1
9.0 References ....... , . 9-1
Table 3-1
Table 6-1
Figures
Figure 1-1
Figure 1-2
Figure 3-1
Figure 5-1
Figure 5-2
Figure 5-3
Tables
Sample Codes, Proposed Sample Activities, Locations, and Rationale
for Monitoring Well Installation/Sampling Investigation ........... 3-6
Sample Containers, Preservatives, and Holding Times ............. 6-2
Site Location Map ......................................... 1-2
Site Layout Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5
New Monitoring Well Location Map ........................... 3-2
Log of Boring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
Above Ground Well Protector Well Installation Log .............. 5-7
Flush Mount Well Protector Well Installation Log ...... 5-8
I 1: 18 pm
Fit::!d $c.mplin;; Plc..'l
£?A Conrrnct No. 68-W-99-043
Work As':iignmc:nl No. 0-t3-R.A.RA-Q4C4
Potler's Pi\~ Sile
+404 561 ,1
1.0 Introduction
1-195 P.009/034 F-529
Sccrion: l
Revision No.: l
Revision Date; Mnrch 1 l, 2002
Pi:.e,c l of 6
This Field Sampling Plan (FSl') w~ prepared for the Potter's Pits Site located in Sandy
Creek, Brunsv.'ick County, .fiuri'ct;r,0and is submitted as documentation of the protocols and
procedures to be followed by Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. (Black & Veatch)
during the remedial action (RA). The specific requirements for development of an approved
FSP are outlined in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) statement of work
(SOW) for the RA at the Potter's Pits Site in Sandy Creek, Brunswick County, North
Carolina, dated September 27, 2001 (EPA, 2001) and the October 12, 2001, scoping meeting
for the site. The FSP was prepared by .B)ack & Veatch for the documentation and
explanation of all Task 7 RA Work Plan (Black & Veatch, 2001a) field activities, laboratory
activities, and contract deliverables related to the acquisition and reporting of data for the
RA. In addition, the FSP allows the El' A to review and approve plans prior to
commencement of work.
1.1 Location of The Potter's Pits Site
The Potter's Pits site is located a residential community known as Sandy Creek in a rural
section of Brunswick County, North Carolina. This community is located approximmely one
mile west of Maco, NC and is located immediately south of US Highway 74/76.
Between 1969 and 1976, waste disposal pits were opera1ed in and around the Sandy Creek
area. Based on site reports, disposal activities consisted of placing waste petroleum products
and septic tank sludges in shallow unlined pits or directly on the land surface.
1.2 Description of The Potter's Pits Site
A residential subdivision now exis1s in the former disposal areas. Typical dwellings in the
subdivision consist of manufactured homes situated situated on one-to two-acre lots, each
having a private domestic water well. There are approximately 150 residential lots within
Sandy Creek. The site consists of open residential yard space and heavily wooded areas that
are drained by Chinnis Branch. Chinnis Branch borders the site to tl1e east fl owing from
southwest to northeast (Ebasco 1990).
Mar-12-02 12:18pm From-North Superfund •
Field Sampling Pli:.n
EPA Controct No. 68-W-99-043
Wofk Assi;;nmcnt No, 043-RARA-04C4
Poncr's Pits Site:
[phone] •
1.3 Operational History of The Potter's Pits Site
T-295 P 001/034 F-62i
Scciion: l
R::visio:i No.: I
Rc..,·ision D.-itc: March 11. 2002
Page 3 of6
In August 1976, the failure of an earthen benn allowed approximately 20,000 gallons of oil
to escape from an unlined pit at the Potter's Pits site. The oil flowed into an onsite creek
(Chillllis Branch) and was transported to Rattlesnake Branch. The U.S. Coast Guard used
containment booms to provide and initial remedial cleanup of the surface waters. Tl1e oil in
adjoining wetland areas could not be removed. The oil remaining in the pit was transferred
to tank trucks and hauled to Fort Bragg Military Reservation in Fayetteville, North Carolina.
The bottom sludges and some oil stained soils were excavated and disposed of in the
Brunswick County Landfill. The remaining thicker sludges which could not be pumped were
mixed with sand and buried onsitc; however, the burial location was not documented .
The property changed ownership between 1980 and 1982. The Gurkin's purchased the site
lots in 1982 a.nd 1983. Mr. Gurkiil uncovered creosote, oils tank bottom sludges, and septic
tank sludges in his yard in July 1983. The State ofNorth Carolina sampled and analyzed the
soils and confirmed the presence of contamination. Mr. Gurkin's shailow well was
condem.ned and he was connected to a neighbors well system.
1.4 Regulatory History of The Potter's Pits Site
In September 1983, EPA and the 1','US Region 4 Field Investigation Team (FIT) performed
an electromagnetic survey of the site, monitored the air W1der the Gurk.iil home, and collected
soil, surface water, and groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. In February 1984,
EPA-Region 4 used groW1d penetrating radar to further delineate the site boW1daries.
In March 1984, an lmn1ediate Removal Action (IRA) at the Potter's Pits site was requested
by the EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Roy F. Weston initiated a
Superfund cle<1.nup of the site in March 1984. The IRA consisted of the excavation and
removal of approximately 1,770 tons of oily sludge and soils (Ebasco 1990).
A groundwater monitoring plan was proposed by EPA, Region 4 in May 1984. Nine
monitoring wells were installed and sampled. Tbe samples were analyzed for volatile
organics. Relatively high conceiltrations of benzene, ethyl benzene, toluene, and xylenes
(BTEX) were detected, in the groundwater samples.
The wells were resampled in 1988 by the State of North Carolina. These samples were
analyzed for volatile organics, phenols, priority pollutant metals, and several nutrients.
BTEX and pheilols were the predominant contam.inants detected.
The Potter's Pits site was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL) on March 31, 1988.
Mar-12-02 12: I 8pm
fi.:-ld Sumpling Pl::in
Ei>A Contract No. 68•W-99-0G3
Work As~ign:-ncnt No. 04'.l-RARA-04CG
Potter's Pits Site
T-28: P.Oi0/034 F-62i
Scc;lon: l
Revision No.: !
Revision Di.le: M~ich 11, 2002
Pag~ 4 of 6
A Remedial Investigation was conducted in 1989 and 1990 by E.C. Jordan, Co. under
contract to Ebasco Services, Inc., to assess the nature and distribution of contaminants a\ the
Potter's Pits site (Ebasco 1990).
In the summer of 1992, tl1e EPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) and selected a remedy
which provides for cleanup of soil and groundwater at the site. The remedy includes:
Extracting groundwater and on-site treatment using above-ground precipitation, flocculation,
and filtration to remove metals; air stripping to remove VOCs with discharge of the treated
water to Chinnis Branch; on-site contaminated soil treatment using a low temperature
thermal desorption unit, testing to determine whether concentrations of heavy metals exceed
cleanup standards and, if so, stabilizing the soil using off-site soil tream1ent. The EPA began
cleanup actions in late l 994 and soils cleanup has been substantially completed.
An additional groundwater investigation was conducted by EPA Region 4, Science and
Ecosystems Suppori Division (SESD) in June 2000 to provide additional data for the
evaluation of monitored natural attenuation (MNA) as a remedy for groundwater
contamination at the site (EPA, 2000b ). The investigation consisted of the installation and
sampling of 7 new monitoring wells in addition to the collection of groundwater samples
from 10 existing monitoring wells and 5 potable residential wells. The present site layout,
including these wells is indicated in figure 1-2. Samples were analyzed for field paxameters
(pH, temperature, conductivity, and turbidity), volatiles, extractables, metals, fenous iron,
dissolved oxygen, and alkalinity. The investigation indicated that groundwater
contamination remains at the site above the concentrations of concern established in the i 992
Record of Decision (ROD). In addition, two trimethylbenzene compounds
(1,2,4-trimethylbenzene and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene) were found in significant
concentrations, which prompted EJ? A to conduct additional risk calculations on these
compounds. Based on the calculations, a total trimcthylbenzene concentra,ion of 60 ug/l
(micrograms per liter) has been established as a risk-based groundwater cleanup goal in
addiiion to the grouadwater cleanup goals presented in tl1e 1992 ROD. The results of the
SESD groundwater investigation were used to evaluate groundwater natural attenuation
processes at the site using the BIOSCREEN model which is applicable to the !latura!
attenuation of dissolved hydrocarbons. Tue results of the BIOSCREEN modeling process
and tl1e evaluation of prior applicable data were used to prepare a repori entitled
Supplemental Evaluation of Monitored Natural At\enuation at the Potter's Pits Site, Sandy
Creek, North Carolina.
Mar-11-01 11: I ipm from-North -fund
Field Sampling Plc.n
EPA Contract No. 68-W-99-043
Work A~~ii;nmcn\ No. 043-RARA-04C4
Pott~r·s Pit~ Sile: ·
T-1i5 P 01 i/034 F-m
Section: l
Rcv1s1on No.: !
Revision D:m::: M:.rcll I l, 2002
Page 6 of6
1.5 Nature and Extent of Contamination at The Potter's Pits Site
1.5.1 Local Contamination Sources
The Potters Pits site is surrounded by a residential area. Local Sources of contamination
may include vehicle
1.5.2 Potter's Pits Site
This section presents the estimated nature and extent of groundwater contarnimition based
on the results of the latest round of groundwater sampling (EPA, 2000b).
Contaminants of concern which currently exceed ROD groundwater cleanup goals are
benzene, ethylbenzene, and naphthalene. In addition to the ROD contan1inants of concern,
1,2,4 trimethylbenzene and 1,3,5 trimethylbenzene were detected in the groundwater at
concentrations which pose a human health-based risk (O'Steen, 2000).
Groundwater analytical data indicate that the majority of the contaminated groundwater
plume is beneath tl1e portion oftl1e site which lies north of Joe Baldwin Drive; however the
plume does extend south of Joe Baldwin Drive to include the area in the vicinity of
monitoring well MW-203 (EPA, 2000b). The areal extent of grotmdwater contamination
which exceeds the ROD groundwater cleanup goals and the risk-based concentrations for
total trimethylbenzenes is approximately 5 acres. Figure 5 of the Supplemenral Evah.;alion
of Monilored Narural Arrenuation at !he Pouer 's Pirs Site, Sandy Creek, North Carolina
Report shows the estimated extent of groundwater contamination at the Potter's Pits site
(O'Steen, 2000).
Mar-12-02 12: Ii pm From-North ,i,nd
Fi~lcl S:lmpliog Pl:1n
EPA Concract No. 68-W-99-043
Work Assignment No. 043-RA.R.A-04C4
Poncr's Pits Site
+<04 :52
2.0 Investigation Objectives
i-295 P 012/034
Section: 2
Rcvlsio11 No.: 0
Revision Dare: M;uch 11. 2002
P;,.&c l of l
The overall purpose of fr1is R/1. investigation is the implementation or construction of the
remedy, performance monitoring, and special requirements. Because the chosen remedy
consists of Monitored Natural Attenuation the investigation constitutes the implemen1a1ion
of the monitoring. The goal is to provide data necessary to fulfill the monitoring strategy
described in the FS Addendum and the revised Record of Decision (ROD).
F-62,
Mar-12-02 I 2: I 9 pm From-North 'fund
field Sampling Plon
EPA Conuact No. 68~W-99-043
Work A.'lSlgnmcm No. Q.13-RARA-04C4
Potter's Pits Site
3.0 Investigation Activities
T-2i5 P.013/031 F-629
Scc:ion: 3
Revision No.: l
Re.,..ision Dt1tc: November 16, 2001
P.i.ge l of 6
Investigation activity work for the Potter's Pits Site is detailed in Sections 3.1 through 3 .3.
The work "~II be conducted during three investigation events; a monitoring well
installation/sampling field investigation, an initial quanedy monitonng event, and an:
oversight of investigation-derived waste (IDW) disposal.
3.1 Monitoring Well Installation/Sampling Investigation
The monito1ing well installation/sampling investigation will include the installation iL'ld
development of 12 monitol'ing wells, 5 shallow wells and 7 deeper monitoring wells and the .
purging and sai:n.pling of25 monitoring wells, including the new wells. This portion of data
collection for the RA is anticipated to be conducted over 2 sh.ifts. All of the groundwater
samples will be analyzed for BTEX compounds (Modified EPA Method 524.2) Naphthalene
(Modified EPA Method 524.2) and Trimethyl Benzene Compounds (Modified EPA Method
524.2). ln addition, extra sample volume will be collected from all. wells to analyze for
natural attenuation parameters. Tbe natural attenuation paran1eters include, non-CLP
methods ·for dissolved oxygen (field); total and fenous iron (field); and total alkalinity
(MCA WW Method 310.2).
The procedw·es to be used for completing the installation of the new permanent monitoring
wells, collecting the subsurface surface soil and groundwater samples, slug testing select
monitoring wells, recording the water levels of monitoring wells, and providing surveying
oversight for the newly installed wells are presented in Section 5.0 ofthis FSP.
The proposed sample numbers, sample activities, sample locations, and rationale of the
samples to be collected are presented in Table 3-2 and identified on Figure 3-2. L
· \'\~~-'1._ J'Yb ~qv-'-5
3.1.1 Groundwater Sampling
Twelve monitming wells are proposed to be installed as part of the groundwater sampling
effort at the Potter's Pits Site. Once installed, groundwater will be sampled from 25
monitoring wells including the new monitoring wells. The analytical results of these
groundwater samples will be used to assess current groundwater conditions wiihin the
surficial aquifer in the area of the Potter's Pits Site. The monitoring wells will be insialled
and the groundwater sai:n.ples will be collected in accordance with the procedures described
in Section 5.3 of this FSP. Proposed monitoring well installation and sa.'Tlpling locations and
rationale ;:ire described in Table 3-2 and are presented on Figure 3-2.
3.1.2 Groundwater Level Measurements
Water level measurements will be obtained from all monitoring wells follo»ing the
installation of the twelve new wells. Groundwater levels will be measured in accordance
with procedures described in Section 5.3.2 of this FSP. This data will be used to develop
Mar-12-02 12: I 9pm From-North ,t•,nd T·2B: P Oi</034
I
Table 3-1
Proposed Sample Codes, Sample Activities, Locations, and Rationale
for Monitoring Well Installation/Sampling Investigation
Sample Code I Sample Activities I Sample Location I Rationale
PP-MW-102 Sa.~ple Groundwau:r Nortl1cast corner of1he site To moniwr artcnuation o:
adiacrnt to Chinnis Branch. contamina.n:s at thi: silc.
PP-MW-106 Sample Gn:;iundwntcr Nor-Jicm cd~c ofilic sitc. To monitor 11ttcnuution of
rnnrnminan!s .it tile site.
l'P-MW-110 S!lI1lp!c Groundwater Northern cdgc of the site. To moniror a\\cnu<nion of
contp.rninunt.s µt lr:c :;itc,
PP-MW-202 Snrnpic Groundw11tcr Wc~t oflhc sire across Grainger To rnanllor anenuntion of
Circle. com::i..rninants at the site.
PP-MW-203 Sample Grou!'l.dw:i.ter Souiliern ponion of 1he site, To monitor artcnuation of
so~tl1 of Joe 811ldwin Drive;, contamin11nl'-at the .,itc,
Pf-i'-'1W-20Q Sumple Groundwater E.1St of~itc adjacent rn Chinnis To mor.i:or :i.rrenuation of
8ranch, contaminant.<; c.t the $il1::,
PP-MW-JOI Sample GroUI\dwaier Along nort".em edge of sire To moni1or ::irienuaLion of
PP-MW-302 con:aminams J! the site.
PP-MW-303 St1-111plr;: Oroundw.alcr Northwc~t corner of the site To monitor uuc:nun:ion of
PP-MW-304 across Grainger Circle. contaminants at the site.
PP-MW-305 Sample Grouridwater Along r1011hem edge ofsitl!. To mor.irnr attenuation of
PP-MW-30~ confumi:iants nl th1:: site:.
PP-MW-307 Snmple Groundwntcr Southern portion of the <;itc:-, To monitor nr.:enuntion of
south of Joe Baldwin Drive. cont~iMms at thl! sire.
PP-MW-401 'lnsto.l! Wtlh/Samplc Groundwuler Ccnlcr of the site. To monitor Jttenuo.ticn of
PP-MW-402 conlaminan,s :,,1 rhe si:c.
PP•MW-403 · Install We!l'.JSample Groundwater Eastem pon:ion of L'ie site. To moniror :1m:nua1ion of
PP-MW-404 comaminams Eii the site.
PP-MW-408 • Install Wells/Sample Gtoundwater Southeast comet of the site,. To monitor .:rne!"luacion of
PP-MW-409 south of Joe Buldwin Drivr::, contnmimml.5 ct !he site,
PP-MW-410 • Install Wells1Sample Groundwater Southwest comec of the site To rnonicor o.t\enuo.\ion of
PP-MW-41! across Grainger Circle. cont.aminams Jl the site
PP-MW-405 · rn~tu.li \Vdl/Sllmple Groundwater Eust.cm edge oflhe sire To monitor uuenu11tion of
adjaccm to Chinnis Branch. com.aminants ac the site
PP-MW-406 · !nstnl! Weil/Sample Groundwater Southern portion of!he site, To mof)itor :i~enu11.1ion o(
south of Joe Baldwin Dtive. contatr,in.1tl!S .:H 1he si1e
PP-MW-407 'lnsrnll \VdU~iample Oroundwn~r Southern portion of chc site, To confirm in:crmcdie:e
south of .Joe Baldwin Drive. side r..rndien;: contRmination.
PP-MW-412 • lnstu.ll WelVS'wnple Groumlw..i1er We.st of the site o.cross Groing~r io monitor attcnuntion of -, ;,, tl-.m
PP ~ Patten P11s.
MW -Moniloring well
-t • New well to be inst;:i.Jlecl
F-629
I
.
Mar-11-01 11:10pm From-North 'fund
field SiJJTip!ing P!un
EPA Conlra.CL No. 68-W-99-043
Work Assignrne:nt No, 043-RAR ... t...-0t;.C4
Po:t::r' 5 Pit:. Site
T-195 P.0l5/03C F-616
St:Clion: ~
Rt:v1sion No.: !
Rcvisiun Oaie: Novrn1hcr 16. 200\
Pugc 4 ot"C'i
a potentiometric surface map for the Potter's Pits site area and \vill assist in understanding
the general groundwater flow direction.
3. 1.3 Container Requirements and Sampling QA/QC
As part of the sampling effort, QC samples will be submitted to the laboratory with field
investigation samples in order to evaluate the confirmatory sampling procedures and
analytical methodologies. A detailed discussion of the types of samples to be collected is
presented in Section 4.4.3 of the QAPP. Approximately five percent of the field
investigation samples will be collected in order to evaluate sampling handling, shipment, and
laboratory procedures. A su,nmary of all samples, analyses and containers for all phases of
the field investigution is presented in Table 3-3. A summary of the QC samples, analyses,
and containers is presented in Table 3-4.
3.1.4 Surveying
The 1welve newly installed moniwring wells will be surveyed during the field inves1igation.
Northing and Easting coordinates will be surveyed as well as the ground elevation and the
elevation of the top of casing point from which water level measurements are collected.
Measmements will be recorded to within the nearest 0.0 l foot. The monitoring wells will
be surveyed in accordance with procedures descJibed in Section 5.3.7 oftJ1is FSP.
3.3 IDW Disposal
The IDW diposal oversight will be conducted after all field investigation activities that
generate IDW have been completed. Drums of IDW 'Nill be separated and identified as
specified in Section 7.0. of this FSP. Activities associated with the oversight will include:
quantifying t.1-ie amount of liquid IDW that may be disposed of at the locally authorized
publically owned treatment works (POTW); procuring an IDW disposal contractor; and
providing oversight for JDW disposal activities once a contractor has been procured.
Mar-12-02 12:20pm From-North Sup,riund •404 562 8788 •
Fii:!tl Sampling Plan
EPA Comrnct No. 68-W-99-043
Work Assignm:::nt Na. 043-RARA•04C4
?oner's Pits Si1i:
•
4.0 Sample Designation
4.1 Monitoring Well Sample Designation History
T-285 P O 16/034 F-62,
Section: 4
Revision No.: 0
Ri:=visian Dcic: March 1 ! , 2001
Pl!.gelofl
Over the history of investigative activities at the Potter's Pits Site, monitoring we!ls have
been assigned various identifiers by which they have sometimes been grouped. Well
groupings in the past have been established based on items such as investigation or the parry
contracting the well installation (i.e. EPA). As a result, Lriere are some old wells at the site
identified EPA-! through EPA-4 and newer wells identified with MW -XYY where X
indicates the round of monitoring well installations and Y indicates the well number.
An additional total of 12 shallow wells are scheduled to be installed during L1ie RA. Black
and Veatch 'Nill continue the present well nun1bering scheme. These wells will belong to the
400 series.
4.2 Sample Numbering
A sample numbering system v,~ll be used to identify each sample for analysis. The purpose
of this numbering system is to provide a trucking system for retrieval of data on each sample.
The sample numbers will include the Potter's Pits site location und the well (Black & Veatch,
2002).
Mar-11-01 11 : 11 pm f rom-Nonh ifund
fh:ld S1101pling Ptnn
EPA Contract No. 68-W-99-043
Work Assignmcm No. 043-RARA-04C4
Poncr'~ Pits Sire
[phone] • i-1,5 P 017/03( f-51,
Stcrion; 5
Revision No: l
Revision Date: M1uch l L 2002
P:i.gc 1 of 11
5.0 Investigation Procedures and Methods
This section presents tl1e field procedures and meiliods to be utilized throughout L'le RD.
Specific field procedures and methods have been selected for use in order to ensure that
sampling and data collection activities arc conducted wiiliin acceptable QA standards;
additional information concerning QA protocols is presented in the QAPP (Black & Veatch,
2002).
5.1 Summary of Sampling Program
Groundwater will be collected from locations at and near the Potter:'s Pits Site as described
in Section 3.0. All samples will be analyzed by the following CLP established analytical
methods: BTEX compounds (Modified EPA Method 524.2) Naphthalene (Modified EPA
Method 524.2); and Trimethyl Benzene Compounds (Modified EPA Method 524.2). ln
addition, extra sample volume will be collected from all wells to analyze for natcral
attenuation parameters. The natural attenuation parameters include, non-CLP methods for
dissolved oxygen (field); total and ferrous iron (field); and total alkalinity (MCA WW
Method 310.2).
The objective of the sampling and preservation procedures outlined in this FSP is to obtain
samples which yield consistently high quality. The use of proper sa.Inpling equipment, strict
controls in the field, and appropriate chain-of-custody and analytical procedures will reduce
the potential for sample misrepresentation and unreliable analytical data.
Specific sampling and preservation procedures to be used in the field investigation are
detailed in the following sections. The EISOPQAM will serve as the primary document from
which all field procedures will be developed (EPA, i 997). Container, preservation, and
holding time requirements must also meet the requirements of the EISOPQAM (EPA, i 997).
The anal)'1ical methods selected and/or modified will have detection limits that are less L'iun,
or equal to, the ROD remediation goals. All contractor personnel conducting sampling will
be experienced in implementing ilie sampling procedures as outlined herein. Modifications
and/or changes to the procedures described in the EISOPQAM or the SOPs presented in this
Work Plan will not be implemented without the prior approval of EPA and will be
documented in field logbooks and on the Field Change Request Form presented as Figure
4-1 in the QAPP.
5.2 Groundwater Investigation
The groundwater investigution at the Potter's Pits Site shall include the installation of 15
groundwater monitoring wells, measurement of grow,dwater levels, monitor!ng w<;,ll
Mar-12-02 12: 21 pm from-North itund
Field Sampling Plan
EPA Contract No. 68-W-99-043
Work ASsignrr:.em No. 043-RARA-04C4
Pau~r•s Pits Site
HOG :sz araa • T-295 P 016/03• f-629
Section: 5
Revision NO' I
Revision D:i.tc: Mivcll 11, 2002
Pagc2ofll
development, monitoring well pwging and sampling, slug testing, and the surveying of the
newly installed groundwater monitoring wells.
All activities associated with the groundwater investigation will be recorded in a field
logbook as described in Section 3.6 of the QAPP (Black & Veatch, 2002). Grotmdwater
development and purging/sampling activities ,vill also be recorded in the field logbook and
on a Well Development Log and a Groundwater Sample Collection Record as presented on
Figures 3-3 and 3-4, respectively, in Section 3.6 of the QAPP (Black & Veatch; 2002).
5.2.1 Monitoring Well Construction and Completion
Twelve groundwater monitoring wells are proposed for installation dwing the RA field effon
at and near the Potter's Pits Site. Well drilling, completion, and development wiil be
conducted in accordance with the standards established _in the EISOPQAM (EPA, 1997).
The proposed monitoring well locations are presented in Section 3.0 of this FSP. Pem1its
to construct the monitoring wells will be secured from the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR), where appropriate, by Black & Veatch's
drilling subcontractor prior to commencement of drilling activities
5.2.1.1 Permanent Monitoring Well Construction. The permanent monitoring wells
at and near the Potter's Pits Site will be installed by Black & Veatch's drilling subcontractor.
The shallow monitoring wells will be drilled to a depth allowing placement of screens up to
I 0-feet long in the surficial aquifer or as much as 15 feet below land surface, The nature of
the subswface at the Potter's Pits site is such that there will be less that l O feet of screen
needed to monitor the full saturated thickness of earth materials above an intermittent, high
plasticity clay zone observed at an elevation of30 to 40 feet. Well screens as small as 5 feet
in length may be used if required by site conditions. The deeper monitoring wells will be
drilled to a depth allowing placement of screens 10 feet long immediately below clay layer
or approximately 25 feet below land surface. The actual depth will be determined in the field
and based upon subsurface geology and site conditions.
The borings for the permanent monitoring wells will be advanced by the hollow s1em auger
method using a nominal 6-inch inside diameter (ID) auger. Soil samples will be collected
24-inch long carbon steel 2-inch ID split spoon samplers at 5-foot intervals from the surface
to depth. The nominal 6-inch ID auger will guarantee an approximate 2-inch annular space
between the well casing and the borehole wall to facilitate the placement of the well
construction materials.
Mar-12-02 12:21pm From-North Supert,nd •
Field Sampling Pl:111
EPA Controc< No. 68-W-99-043
Work Assignmcrit No. 043-AAR.A-04C4
Potter's Pil5 Silr:;
[phone] • 1·2i5 P.Oii/031 F-62i
Srction; ~
Revision No: I
Rcvi~ion Dlltc; M!irdi 11, 2002
Pugc;: 3 of 1 t
Construction details for the proposed monitoring wells described herein are detailed on
Figures 5-2 and 5-3 on Well Installation Logs. A typical well with an above ground well
protector is presented on Figure 5-2 and a typical well v-.ith a flush mount protector is
presented on Figure 5-3. A Well Installation Log will be generated for each well installed.
Upon reaching total depth, the borehole will be back-washed with potable water to remove
drilling mud from the borehole. Decontaminated riser pipe and well scree:1 constrncted of
2-inch diameter, flush threaded, Schedule 40 PVC with slotted screens of 0.0 l 0-inch
continuous openings.
Based on data from previous investigations, variation in the lithology of the surficiai aquifer
is anticipated to vary from a clean, fairly uniform-grained sand to more clayey or silty sand
materials. The bottom of the screen will be fitted with a threaded PVC bottom sump. An
approp1iately sized and prewashed silica sand v.ill be used for the filter pack material. The
filter pack will be applied by pouring or by the tremie method a minimum of 12 inches under
the bottom of the well plug and will extend up to no less than two feet above the top of the
well screen, as possible. Bentonite pellets (1/4 inch diameter or less) will then be placed
down the annular space to provide a seal no less than two feet thick above the sand pack, as
possible.
The bentonite pellet seal.is anticipated to lie below the water table, and should not require
manual hydration subsequent to installation. Depths to the top of the sand pack and the top
of the bentonite seal v.ill be measured using a weighted tape or a measured tremie line. The
remaining annular space v.ill be grouted by tremie pipe to within approximately two feet of
the surface with a 30% high solids bentonite grout composed of CETCO Pure Gold®
bentonite powder and potable water (measured weight of the bentonite grout is to be no less
than 10 pounds per gallon using a drilling contractor supplied mud balance).
Mar-11-01 11:11pm From-North Suporiunci T-195
Uh'A/-/ . ..,.Ur' r
~ SLACK & VEATCH Special Projects Corp.
8 ORlf\!G NO. PP-rviW-40·1
LOG OF BORING SHEET I OF 0
CLIENT jPROJECT · PROJECT NO.
USEPA, ReQ10n !Y Trans Clrcuns, Inc. 48116,101
PROJECT LOCATION I cioR□~N_ATES I ELEVATION (DATUM) I TOTAL DEPTH DATE START
Lake ParK, FL ' (AMSll FEET
SURF ACE CONDITIONS I LOGGED BY OATI: FINISH
SAMPliNG CHECKED BY I APPROVED BY
"' "' "' >-w w "" ,.. 'l! C, :!: 5, :I: w w =
_J w &~ z3 -'W 'le f;: :ii~ ~~ ~~ !il: ;; f-< lJJ w (!) ;,; ,.. ;:\~ > ;},::] 0.. ~ = = w 0 = u_ >-_J
f-CORING 2:: u w I CLASS!F!CA TION OF :.I/\ TE RIAL REMAMKS >->-f->-_J
"' I "' "' tiS = I c.. 0..
~~ "~ z t; "" '!;' @"= 8 f-::,: ., ~ is 0.. < "' 0 -al~ ~§ ~o "' 8 = u "' =u BS cl w (/l (D "' w ~ c:, = ~ =
I-
SPT I --/--2---
SPT 2 --I-- -3-
SPT 3 --!---' 4
5
SPT A --!-- -
e
7
SPT 5 --/---e
g
10
II -
12 -
13-
I< -
SPT 8 -!-' 15 -----
18~
17
18 -
19-
SPT 10 -I--20----
21~
22
23 -
24 -
SPT 13 -!---25 ---2ei.
27 -
28 -
29 -
"' ~ z
Mar-11-01 12:22pm Fram-North Suoerfund
TOP OF PVC WELL CASING------t=1~~=7
MINIMUM 3'X3'X6" THICK
CONCRETE PAD~
.: ',½''i"
2" I.D. Schedule 40 ----h4,<1
PVC WELL RISER
PUREGOLD BENTONITE GROU"f----<>-
GROUNDWATER SURFACE\ ------I
SILICA SAND FILTER PACK-----1
[phone] T-295 P 021/034 F-629
4"X4"X5' LOCKING. GALVANIZED
---....... STEEL WELL PROTECTOR
MINIMUM 2', IF POSSIBLE
MINIMUM 2', IF POSSIBLE
oo ..J w w z
i:i:: ~
i!: "' [L ~ WW 00
(UNLESS OTHERWISE NECESSITATED
BY A SHALLOW WATER TABU::.)
~----BOREHOLE (APPROX. 10" DIA.)
PVC (2" SCHEDULE 40
0. Oi O SLOT, iO' LONG)
PVC END CAP
(2", Schedule 40
APPROX. 6" -----'L
TYPICAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
WITH ABOVE GROUND WELL PROTECTOR
FIGURE
5-2
Mar-12-02 12:22pm From-Nor th , t,nd
iOP OF PVC WELL CASING
MINIMUM 3'x3'x5· THICK
. CONCRETE PAD
2" I.D. Schedule 40 ----JL,,4>'1
PVC WELL RISER
PUREGOLD BENTONITE GROU'F------<-
GROUNDWATER SURFACE~
SILICA SAND FILTER PACK ---~...i
•404 562 Bi!! T-29: P.022/034 F-629 •
FLUSH MOUNT
PRDTECTlVE STEEL CASING
MINIMUM 2', IF POSSIBLE
MINIMUM 2', IF POSSIBLE
(UNLESS OTHERWISE NECESSITATED
BY A SHALLOW WATER TABLE.)
r~---~ BOREHOLE (APPROX. 10" DIA.)
,·....,-+----PVC (2" SCHEDULE 40
0.010 SLOT, 1 o· LONG)
PVC END CAP
(2", Schedule 40 )
APPROX. 6"
TYPICAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
WITH FLUSH MOUNT PROTECTOR
,"IGURE
5-3
Mar-11-01 11:11pm from-North liund
Fl~ld Snmplit1{!. ?la,i
EPA Contract No. 68-W-99-043
Work Assii;nmcnt No, 043-lv\RA-04C4
Poit~r•~ Pits Site
+404 561 i T-195 P 011/014 F-611
Scclion: 5
Rcv1sio11 No: 1
Rcvlsion Date: Marcil 11. 2002
PJ.gc 6 of 11
5.2.1.2 Monitoring Well Completion. Drill cuttings and fluids which result from the
well installation process will be containerized in Department-of Transportation (DOT)-
approved 55-gallon UN lA-1 or lA-2 drums. Monitoring wells will be sealed to the ground
surface with concrete and a minimum three-foot by three-foot by six-inch thick concrete
surface pad that slopes away from the center of the pad and protective casing. A lockuble
protective casing, approximately four-inches by four-inches with a minimum two-and-one-
half-foot stickup or a flush mounted, traffic rated steel cover with locking we)l cap, will be
installed in the concrete to provide wellhead security. In order to diminish anticipated well-
head corrosion problems, the protective casings will be constructed of aluminum, steel, or
cast iron and painted with rust-resistant paint. Keyed-alike locks will be used to secure the
wells. The stick-up protective casings will have one weep hok to prevent water from
standing inside of the prornctive casing. In addition, four 3-inch diameter (minimmn)
concrete-filled steel posts will be placed adjacent to each concrete pad as bumper guards to
protect the aboveground protective casings. The posts shall be a minimum of five feet in
length and extend approximately three feet above the swface.
Additional work to be performed during the drilling phase includes the replacement of two
above-ground well protectors on existing wells with flush mount well protectors. The
security of all existing wells will be checked and well locks will be replaced, if necessary.
5.2.2 Monitoring Well Development
The newly installed groundwater monitoring wells will be developed by Black & Veatch
prior to initiating groundwater sampling. Development of the well will occur no sooner than
24 hours after installation of the surface pad. Development of the wells will involve
mechanical surging using either a 1.25-inch OD tremie pipe ,,~th an end cap or a 1.25-inch
OD solid PVC block and pumping using to remove fines and stimulate yield. The
monitoring well will be developed until the water in the well is free of visible sediment, and
the pH, conductance, turbidity, and temperature have stabilized three consistent readings
(EPA, 1997).
Development fluids will be containerized in DOT-approved 55-gallon UN l A-1 or l A-2
drums and labeled according to contents. Equipment utilized for monitoring well
development will be decontamimited in accordance with procedures specified in Section 5.4
of mis FSP. Dming the monitoring well d~velopment process, specific conductivity, p!-I,
turbidity, and temperature measurements will be recorded in the field iogbook. DW'ing the
development process, water will be withdrawn, typically every 20 gallons, from the
monitoring well and pomed into a clean glass container. The temperature, spedfic
conductivity, pH, and turbidity measurements will be measured immediately. All probes will
be rinsed with organic free water. Turbidity will be measured in acco,·dance with ilic
Mar-12-02 12 : 2 3.om from-North ifund
fidd Sumpling Pinn
EPA Contt.ict No. 68-W-99-043
Work ASo;ignrr.~rn No. 043-RARA-04(4
Porter's Pits S\lc
T-295 ? 024/034 f-629
Section; 5
R~vi:don No; l
Revi,;ion Otl:c: M.irch 11, 2002
P&gc7of!1
turbidity meter manufacturer's specifications. Instruments used to measure field parameters
during well development will be calibrated prior to each use. Well development activities
will also be recorded on a Well Development Record as presented in Section 3 6, Figure 3,2
of the QAPP (Blad, & Veatch, 2002).
5.2.3 Monitoring Well Purging
The permanent monitoring wells located at and·near the Poner's Pits site will be purged
immediately prior to initiating groW1dwater sampling in order to remove tlie stagnant water
from the well. The water removed from the well will be replaced with groundwater from the
formation, which is representative of aquifer conditions. The procedure for purging the
monitoring well is described in accordance with the EISOPQAM (EPA, 1997).
Prior to initiating purging, the total amow1t of water in the well must be determined from the
diameter ofthe well, water level, and total depth. The volume of water in each well will be
the following equation:
where: V = volume of water (gallons)
d ~ diaineter of well (inches)
h ~ depth of water (feet)
Monitoring wells will be purged using a decontaminated submersible pump equipped with
dedicated tubing. The pump intake line will be placed slightly below the top of the water
surface in order to pull water from the entire length of the water column. During monitoring
well purging, specific conductivity, pH, turbidity, dissolved oxygen (DO), redox potential,
ferrous iron, and temperature measurements will be recorded in the field logbook and on the
Groundwater Sample Collection Record presented on figure 3-3, Section 3.6 of the QAPP
(Black & Veatch, 2002). Purging will terminate when a minimum of three well casing
volumes have been withdravm from the monitoring wells, and field parameter readings have
stabilized (pH readings within O. l urlits, specific conductance within IO percent, rurbidity
less than IO NTUs, and tempernture, ferrous iron, and dissolved oxygen within IO percent)
over four consecutive readings or upon evacuating five well volumes from each well.
Specific types of field measurement equipment and the associated procedures for their use
and calibration are described in Section 4.5 of the QA.PP. Water from well purging will be
containerized in DOT-approved 55-gallon UN l A-I or I A-2 drums and labeled according
to conteots.
Mar-I 2-02 12:23pm From-Nor th Suc,rfund •
Fie:ld Sampling Plan
EPA Convacr No. 68-W-99~043
Work Assignment No. 04J-RARA-04C4
Ponet'i PilS Sltc
+40t ,s2 sm • i-2i5 P 02:/034 F-629
Section; 5
Revision No: 1
R~vision Dare: M11rch l l, :Z00:2
Pllg.: 8 of 11
Equipment used for purging will be decontaminated in accordance v.'ith procedures specified
in Section 5.3 of this FSP, except for the dedicated tubing which v.,jll be discarded after use.
All field measurement equipment probes will be rinsed \\,jth organic free water.
5.2.4 Groundwater Level Measurements
Subsequent to the completion of the permanent monitoring wells, the groundwater levels and
total depth of these wells will be measured prior to development and again 24 hours after
development and/or prior to groundwater sampling. Groundwater level data from these wells
will be used to produce potentiometric surface maps.
After unlocking the monitoring well and removing the cap, the ambient air will be monitored
using an OVA to evaluate the presence of organic vapors. A decont=inated, electric water
level indicator will tl1en be placed into the monitoring well to measure the depLfi to the static
water level and total depth of the well. The measUiement will be recorded to the nearest 0.01
foot and will be taken from a reference notch at the top of the monitoring well casing. The
water level measurement and total depth measurement for the monitoring well will be used
to calculate development and purge volumes.
5.2.5 Groundwater Sampling
After the permanent monitoring wells at and near Urn Potter's Pits site have been allowed to
stabilize, each well will be pUiged for groundwater s=pling. Wells will be sampled using
a low-flow peristaltic pump equipped witl1 dedicated Teflon® tubing and a vacuum jug. The
Teflon® tubing will be placed into the well slightly below the top of the water surface in
order to pull water from tlle entire length of the water column.
All of the groundwater s=ple containers, with the exception of the volatile organic analysis
(VOA) vials, will be filled using an in-line vacuum system with a low-flow peristaltic pump.
Dus is accomplished by placing a Teflon® transfer cap onto the neck of a standard cleaned
4-liter (I-gallon) amber glass jug. The Teflon®tubing will connect the glass jug to both the
well and the pump. The pump mll create a vacmun in the jug, thereby drawing water from
the well into the jug.
The volatile organic ponion of the: sample mil be collected after the otl1er contain~rs have
been filled by first disconnecting the Teflon® tubing from the peristaltic pump. The Teflon®
tubing will be lowered into the well beneath the water surface allowing it to fill with
groundwater. The Teflon® tubing will then be removed from the well after a nitrile-gloved
thumb has been placed over the opposite end ofthe tubing and allowed to drain directly into
VOA vials.
Mar-12-02 12:23pm F rom-Ncr th lrlund
Field Snmp\ir.g Plan
EPA Contracr No. 68-W-99~043
Work Assignml!nt No. 043-RARA-04C4
Paller'i Pits Sltc
+404 562 i T-2i5 P.026/034 F-621
Sccrian: 5
Revision No; l
R.c:vi~lon D~1e: MMcl1 11. 2002
Pe,gc 9 of i I
Container requirements along with preservation procedures and holding times are presented
in Section 6.0, Table 6-1 of th.is FSP. Samples for chemical analyses will be placed in iced
coolers. The field team leader will be responsible for eiamining the samples and logging all
observations. Samples will be labeled, packed, and shipped in accordance with the
procedures specified in the Section 4.3 of the QAPP (Black & Veatch, 2002).
5.2.6 Surveying
All newly installed monitoring wells will be surveyed during the field investigation.
Northing and Easting coordinates will be surveyed as wdl as the ground elevation and the
elevation of the top of casing point from which water level measurements are collected.
Measurements will be recorded to within the nearest 0.01 foot. Horizontal values will be
recorded per the North American Datum 1983, Adjustmeni 1990 (NAD 83190); and
Geographic Information (Latitude and Longitude). Vertical values will be based on NGVD
29.
5.3 Decontamination Procedures
Procedures for equipment decontamination will be implemented to avoid cross-
contamination of subsurface strata and samples of various media which are to be submitted
for chemical analyses. Decontamination procedures will meet or exceed the requirements
of the EISOPQAivf (EPA, 1997). One decontamination station "~ll be constructed during
the course of the field work. The decontamination station location will be selected by Black
& Veatch. Drill rigs and all drilling and sampling equipment will be thoroughly cleaned and
decontaminated before initial use and before leaving tl1e site area upon completion of field
activities. All downhole equipment will be cleaned between sample locations.
Prior to mobilizing to any permanent monitoring well location, t11e drill rig should be cleaned
of any contaminants that may have been transported from anorher hazardous waste site, to
minimize the potential for cross-containination. If potable water is not readily available at
the decontamination station, tap water (potable) brought on the site for driliing and cleaning
purposes should be contained in a pre-cleaned tank of sufficient size so that drilling activities
can proceed without having to stop and obtain additional water. The drill rig and other
equip)nent associated with the drilling and sampling activities ½ill be inspected to ensure that
all oils, greases, hydraulic fiuids, etc., have been removed, and all seals and gaskets are intact
with no fluid leaks. In addition, associated drilling and decontamination equipment, well
construction materials, and equipment handling procedures will meet the following minimum
specified criteria modified from the EISOPQAM:
Mar-11-01 11:14pm From-North Ir fund
FiclC S11.mpling Plan
EPA Con:rne\ No. 68-W-99-043
Work Assignment No. 04J-R.A,.RA.-04C4
Pot1cr's ?ils Sice
+404 561 i T-115 P.017/034 f-619
Sc,tion: 5
Revision No: 1
R(:vi~ian Date: March 11. :iooi
P:\gc 10 of 11
• All downhole augering, drilling, and sampling equipment should be sandbiasted
before use if painted, and/or mere is a buildup of rust, hard or caked matter, etc.,
1hat cannot be removed by steam cleaning (soap and high pressure hot waicr), or
wire brushing. Sandblasting should be performed prior to arrival on site, or well
away from the decontamination pad and areas to be sampled.
• Any portion of the drill rig, backhoe, etc., that is over the borehole (kelly bar or
mast, backhoe buckets, drilling platform, hoist or chain pulldowns, spindles,
catl1ead, etc.) \Nill be steam cleaned (soap and high pressure hoI water) and wire
brushed (as needed) to remove all rust, soil, and ot.'1er material which may have
come from other hazardous waste sites before being brought on site.
• All well materials a,,d related items slrnll be new. Printing and/or writing on well
casing, tremie tubing, etc., shall be removed before use.
The decontamination station will be constructed at a suitable on-site location. ln general, the
station will be covered wi.th a durable liner (such as a fiberglass reinforced tarp) such :hat
decontamination fluids can £low into a lined collection pit, sump, or trench. The bottom of
the pit should be lined with plywood to keep equipment from tearing the lining. Fluids
generated as a result of decontamination will be placed in drums using a pump from the
collection area to the drum. Decontamination station sheeting will be removed and placed
in drums when decontamination activities have been completed,
Two levels of equipment decontamination shall be utilized during the field investigation.
Method I will be used for all equipment that will be come into contact with analytical
san1ples. Method II will be used for all downhole and related equipment.
Method I:
The following procedures are to be used for all sampling equipment used to collect routine
samples undergoing trace organic or inorganic constituent analyses:
l. Clean with tap water and soap using a brush if necessary to remove particulate
matter and surface films. Equipment may be steam cleaned (soap and high pressure
hot water) as an alternative to brushing. Sampling equipment that is steam cleaned
should be placed on racks or saw horses at least two feet above the floor of the
decontamination pad. PVC or plastic items should not be steam cleaned.
2. Rinse thoroughly with tap water.
3. Rinse thoroughly with analytc free water.
4. Rinse thorougrJy with pesticide grade isopropanol. Do not rinse PVC or plastic
items witl1 pesticide grade isopropanol.
Mar-11-01 11:14pm From-North Suoerlund •
field S:implin;; Pli111
EPA Contrnct No. 68-W-99-043
Work Assignment No. 0.:!3-RAR.4-0<lC'!
Pone(~ Pi1s Site
+404 561 a788 •
5. Rinse thoroughly with organic/analyte free water.
T-195 P 018/034 F-619
Section: 5
Revision 'No; i
Revision Oa.t~: March 11, 2.002
?e.o,c 1 1 of ! l
6. Remove the equipment from the decontamination area and cover with plastic.
Equipment stored overnight will be covered and sealed with clean, unused plastic.
Method ll:
The drill rig and related drilling equipment will be steam cleaned between soil boring
locations using the foUowing procedure:
1. Wash with a high-pressure [2,500 pounds per square inch (psi) and 200°F plus]
steam cleaner with phosphate-free laboratory grade detergent (such as Liquinox®)
and potable water. Drilling equipment should be placed on racks or saw horses at
least two feet above the floor of the decontamination pad. Hollow-stem augers,
drill rods, etc., that are hollow or have holes tha: transmit water or drilling fluids,
should be cleMed on the inside with vigorous brushing.
2. Rinse thoroughly with high-pressure steam cleaner using potable water.
3. If oil or grease is observed, rinse with pesticide-grade isopropanol.
4. Rinse thoroughly with organic/analyte free water.
Final decontamination of all equipment used to complete the drilling and sampling effort will
be required pi:ior to equipment demobilization from the site. This decontamination step is
required to prevent contaminants from being rransported offsite by subcontrnctors' vehicles.
Final decontamination 'Nill be performed at the decontamination area and will be witnessed
by field personnel. The procedures used for decontamination between soil boring locations
will be utilized during final decomamination.
Mar-11-01 11:15pm F rom-Ncrth ifund
Field. Sarnp!ing Pl;rn
E?A Connact No. 68•W-99-043
Work Assignment No. 043-R.ARA-04C4
Potter's Pits Site
H04 562 Elio • l-2i5 P.02i/031 f-519
s,,tion: 6
Rcvi~ion No.: I
Rcvis[on Ont:=: Murch 11, 2002
P.:igc l oO
6.0 Sample Handling and Analysis
6.1 Sample Containment and Preservation
Sample containment and preservation are as important to any environmental sampling event
as the procedures by which the sample is colkcted. All of the groundwater samples to be
collected at the Potter's Pits Site as described in Section 3.0 of this FSP will be are be
analyzed by the following CLP una\ytical methods: BTEX compounds (Modified El? A
Method 524.2) Naphthalene (Modified EPA Method 524.2); and Trimetb.yl Benzene
Compounds (Modified EJ?A Method 524.2).
Additionally, samples will be analyzed using the non-CLP meH1od for total alkalinity
(MCA WW Method 310.2).
The proper containers, preservation methods, and holding times established for the analytical
methods to be used for the Pot,er' s Pits soil and water matrix samples are presented in Table
6-1.
6.2 Sample Collection Documentation
Sample collection docuinentation procedures are another vital aspect of any envirorunental
sampling event. Each sainple or field measurement must be properly documented to
facilitate timely, correct, and complete analysis. Additionally, sample custody procedures
are necessary to support the use of data in potential enforcement actions at a site.
6.2. 1 Field Operations Records
The most important aspect of sample collection documentation is thorough, accurate
recordkeeping. The doc~'Xlentation of field operations associated with sample collection will
be recorded on Well Development Logs, Groundwater Sample Collection Records, field
logbooks, Log of Borings, Well Installation Logs, and photodocumentation logs.
Information required on Well Development Logs, Groundwater Sample Collection Records,
and field logbooks, is discussed in Section 3.6 of the QAPP (Black & Veatch, 2001 b).
lnfo1mation to be included on the Log ofBorings and the Well 1nstallation Logs are indicated
on Figures 5-1 and 5-2 of this fSP. Jnformation to be included in photodocumentation logs
is discussed below.
Sarnple collection or other sample associated documentation may also take the fonn of
photographs which will be organized into a photodocumentation log. The photographs may
show the sWTounding area and reference objects that identify tl1e sampling locations. The
film roll number will be identified by photographing an informational sign on tl1e first frame
TalJle 6-1
Sample Containers, Preservatives, and Holding Times J
Potter's Pits Site, RA
Sandy Cred., Brunswick County, North Carolina
. :-; ·C~wtaiOc/· ;-. M111rix Jla1-amete.r Method of ... Sa_.mp1e
: Anaiy·s_i~
.. Pr~ser"Vation . . .
, .
Groundwater Volatile OrgaJlic~ Modified EPA 3 x 40 ml, G Ice 10 4°C
(CLP) Method 624 Tenon-lined HCl to pH< 2
septum cap no headspacc
Groundwater Total Alkalinit,· MCA WW Method 310.2 Ix 250mL, P Ice to 4°C
(Other)
Notes:
J Sample containers, preservatives, and holding times were obtained from ElSOPQAM and laboratory information.
2 All con1aincrs must have Teflon-lined seats {Teilon-hned septa for all VOA vials).
3 When only one holding 1jme is given, it implies total holding time from sampling until analysis.
G Glass.
p Plastic.
A Amber.
-. ,-. . ·'l
M:n:i~um llolui_,:ig_rfi_me.
,·. · ·E1 tTa-ction ),;i,,i]ysis
.. 14 days
--·
...
' m ~ "'
Mar-11-01 11:15pm From-North 'fund
Field Snmp!ing Plan
EPA Conttccl No. 68-W-99-043
Work Assi~mcnl No. Q4J-R..A..RA•04O1
Poncr's PitS Sire
i-195 ? 031/034 F-61,
Sc::1ion: 6
Revision No.: l
Rcvisiot1 Octc: Mo'.).rch ! i, 2002
P3gc) of3
ofthe roll. This sign will show the site name, initials of photographer, film roll nwnbcr, and
date to identify the pictures contained on the roll.
For exarnple: Potter's Pits Site RA,
JKB, Roll I
March 11, 2002
An entry will be made in the field log identifying which sampling location is depicted in each
photograph. Logbook entries of photographs will have four major components:
photographer's initials, roll number and frame nwnber, date and a description of what was
photographed.
For example: JKB, 1-1, 12-10-01, Sampling at Well PP-MW-402.
Photographs will be attached to a photographic documentation form sheet that will contain
the following information:
Sheet No.
Film No. (Roll No.)
Site Name and Location
Date Photograph Was Taken
Day of the Week Photograph Was Taken
Direction the Photographer Was Pointing the Camera
Objects of Importance in !:'holograph (Sampling Location Identification)
Roll No./Framc No.
Photographic documentation fo1m sheets may contain one or more photographs per page.
6.2.2 Sample Custody Documentation
The sample chain-of-custody procedure provides another means of sample collection
documentation. The sa.'11ple chain-of-custody procedure documents the identifying, tracking,
and monitming of each sample from the point of collection through final data reporting.
Sample labels, sample tags, custody seals, EPA Organic or Inorganic Traffic Report and
Chain-of-Custody Records (for CLP analysis), Black & Veatch Chain-of-Custody Records
(for other than CLP analysis), and air bill numbers are used to maintain sample custody from
collection through shippi.11g to the analytical laboratory. Information on how each of these
items are used in the sample chain-of-custody p,:-ocedure is presented in Section 4.3 of the
QAPP (Black & Veatch, 200 i b). Each analytical laboratory establishes its own chain-of-
custody procedures for samples once they have arrived at the laboratory; however, CLP
laboratories must have procedures approved by EPA.
Mar-12-02 12:26pm From-North 'fund +40, ss2 sm • T-295 P 032/034 F-629
FicJU Samplin~ P!.1n
EPA Contrnct No. 6~-W-99-043
Work Assignment No. 043-R.ARA-04(.',
Potte:r's PilS Si:c:
Section; 7
Revision No.: J
Rcvi!-ion D:n~: t...1srch 11, 2002
Pagc \ or'2
7.0 Investigation-Derived Wastes
Various types oflD\V are defined in the E!SOPQAM, Chapter 5 (EPA, 1997). Types of
!PW anticipated 10 be generated at the Potter's Pits Site include: 1) personal
decontamination stations liquids; 2) drill cuttings; 3) well development and purge water; 4)
PPE; 5) decontamination fluids; and 6) uncontaminated wastes. This IDW is the only form
of contaminants or pollutants anticipated to be generated as a result of RD activities.
Therefore, the procedui-es and safeguards listed below for each of the types of IDW
anticipated to be generated at the Potter's Pits Site will serve as the pollution control and
mitigation plan for the site. The types ofIDW that are anticipated 10 be produced during the
field operations at the Potter's Pits Site and the procedures and safeguards for processing
those wastes include the following:
• Personal Decontamination Station Liquids. These liquids include the wash
water from the boot wash and the hand and face wash comainers.
Contaminants typically found in these liquids result from activities which
bring personnel in contact with the soil. The water will be placed in POT-
approved 55-gallon UN lA-1 or lA-2 drums, labeled to indicate contents,
and staged at a predetermined accumulation area on site.
• Drill Cuttings. These materials are generated during the drilling of the
boreholes. The procedure for handling the drill cuttings will be:
Containerize the cuttings separately from each borehole in DOT-
approved 55-ga.\lon UN lA-1 or lA-2 drums.
Label to indicate contents.
Stage the drums at the fenced accumulation area on site.
lf drilling fluids are used, waste fluids will also be placed in drnms.
• Well Development and Purge Water. These fluids include the groundwater
obtained from monitoring well development and presarnpiing purging
activities. The development and purge water will be containerized in DOT-
approved 55-gallon UN lA-1 or lA-2 drums, labeled to indicate contems,
and staged on site.
• Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). This category includes the disposable
work clothing such as booties, gloves, and coveralls, worn by field personnel
during the field investigation. The procedure for handling disposable
personal protective clothing will be:
Place such a11icles in DOT-approved 55-gallon UN lA-1 or lA-2
drums.
Mar-12-02 12:26pm From-North Suoerfund •
riclr.! Sump\ing Pion
6PA Contract No. 68-W-99-043
Work Assignment No. 043-RARA-04C4
Potter's Pits She
Label to indicate contents.
Stage the drums on site.
+,o, s,2 i-295 P. 033/034
Section: 7
R~vi~ion No .. l
Rcvi:.ion Dare: 1'-forch 11 1 2001
Page 2 of 2
Househoid trash, packaging, and other uncontaminated solid waste
materials will not be placed in drums.
• Decontamination Fluids. These fluids include wash waters used to
decontaminate the drilling and sampling equipment as well as the PPE
decontamination fluids. The wash waters will be containerized in DOT-
approved 55-gallon UN lA-1 or IA-2 drums, labeled to indicate contents,
and staged at the fenced accumulation area on site.
• Uncontaminated Wastes. Packaging, household trash, flagging, etc., will be
placed in trash sacks and removed from the sire periodically by the contractor
field team at the completion of field work.
Drums containing cuttings, waste fluids, and personal protective ciothing will be staged at
the fenced accumulation area on site during the field investigatio11 and placed on pallets. The
drums will be removed from each monitoring well installation location upo11 completion of
well development at each location. Additional drums utilized during monitoring well
sampling will be removed upon completion of the groundwater sampling effort. The final
disposition of the drummed wastes will depend upon.the field sample analytical results as
supplemented by analyses of drum contents. Disposal shall be consistent with applicable
federal, state, and local regulations or guidance. Any portion of the wastes, including well
development and pwge water, which are determined to be hazardous based on the analytical
results 'Nill be removed from the site for disposal in an appropriate facility by Black &
Veatch's subcontractor for IDW i:emoval.
f-629
Mar-12-02 12:26pm From-North Suo,rfu11d •
Field S\JlTipling Phir:
EPA Co11trnc:t No. 68-W-99-043
Work As~lb,nm~m No. 043-RARA•04C4
Por.cr's Pi1s Si:c:
+<04 552 Sioi •
8.0 Field Activities Schedule
i-2,5 ? 034/034 f-626
s.:,tion; 8
Revision No.: l
Revision Date: Mnrc:h l \, 200'2
PJgc l of l
Figure 5-i in the Draft Work Plan shows the anticipated schedule for the field activities to
be completed dming each field investigation (Black & Veatch, 200 i ). The project schedule
is based on beginning the field investigation activities on March 11, 2002. In order to meet
this schedule, approvals on the following plans and documents n~ed to be approved by EPA
Region IV no later than the dates indicated:
• Final Work Plan -February 22, 2002
• Final QA?P -March 11, 2002
• Final FSP -March 11, 2002
• HASP: Site HASP and Task 1 HASP March 11, 2002
In addition, access has to be obtained for the those properties on which the investigation will
be performed, but for which access has not yet been granted.
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Nile Testennan
Superfund Section
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Federal Remediation Branch
Diane Rossi
Groundwater Section
WiRO
Potter's Septic Tank Service
Brunswick County
• RECEIVED
'/.\UG 2 5 2000
SUPEF\FUND SECTION
Per our telephone conversation, I am forwarding a copy of the newspaper article concerning the
Potter's Septic Tank incident. The article gave us the impression that this site had already been
approved for natural attenuation and that no further action would be required.
Thank you for the update on the site and for forwarding the preliminary report and any other
subsequent reports that you receive. We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on this
project.
Should you have questions, please call me at [phone].
s:\gws\diane\potters.nile.mem
~. -.-~ '· .. ·.c -::-...
"j Sr a 9¥ iM #-ffc& & MiiffifyA-iii&i#Sr &JtW &4& ¥& -BP.# IHSW & tP#i&◄ -i ! L-: · Federal J i-:. --gran~ jul'}' ·
: 11rob1ng R.J. · Reynolas 3B
Morning Star, Saturday, August 19, 2000
EPA says polluted site cleaning itself
By WILLIAM DAVIS
Staff wn·ter
A piece of land· in Brunswick County on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's list of the most polluted sites may be slowly repairing itself, possibly saving the goverrlment millions in cleanup costs.
In 1983, the EPA discovered soil saturated by waste from a sludge and oil spill cleanup operation on land in what would become part of the town of Sandy Creek. EPA workers .. cleared contaminated soil from the ·:-µea, but believed they would have to .::pump out and clean groundwater ·:·from beneath it. ·
·:.: Data ~ollected ~ince 1992 show ~:that the contamination is· disap-. ;pearing naturally, said Diane Barrett,
Disabled·
take part
in water
ski clinic
By C.J. CLEMMONS
Staff Writer
"Am I first? I'm ready,"
shouted Billy Eno as he peeled off his socks and . sneakers on Friday at the Johnson Marina on the · Intracoastal Waterway.
EPA cOmmunity involveinent coordi-
nator. Engineers believe bacteria in . the ground are digesting the contami-nants, turning them into hannless ·compounds.Because of this, the EPA wants to continue to monitor the water and let nature take its course.
"It appears that the contamination is being naturally degraded. It's lower. It's not down yet, but it is in
the process," Ms. Barrett said. Even though the agency said con-taminated water had not seeped into wells outside the site, people are still worried, said Sandy Creek Mayor Earl Gurkin.
"There's always that little bit of doubt," Mr. Gurkin said. ·
Problems at the site were discov-ered in 1976 when the Coast Guard traced_ a 20,000-gallon oil spill in Rat-tlesnake Branch near Maco back to four unlined pits belonging w Pot-. ter's Septic Tank Service, according . to the EPA. Once the company admitted using pits to dispose of oil, creosote and septic sludge, the gov-ernment pumped out the pits, mixed · the remaining sludge with dirt and buried it. .
The property changed hands, and in 1983 the hew ownef discovered sludge in his front yard. The EPA
investigated and found. petroleum byproducts in his well.
Since an estimated 1,780 people drew water from wells within three miles of the site, the EPA removed around 3 million pounds of contami-nated soil from the site. While the EPA had planned to pump out and treat·the water near the site, it said that the contamination had _not spread to other area wells.
The agency held a public hearing Aug. 10 and will collect comments on the cleanup until Sept. 8, said Ms. · Barrett. If no one shows the EPA proposal is not the best method, the agency will proceed.
Pumping out contaminated groundwater would have cost about $7.1 million. Basic well monitoring
could cost around $2 million or per-haps less, Ms. Barrett said .
AW¥ &? ¥±56 i§ r +·:tz: 5 ii3r& ?ciobWi#$ i41AiB&i+ ~[
OBITUARIES 48
'
St.Ill photo I JEFFREY 5. OTTO A monitoring well sits locked on the former site of the Potter's Septic Tank Service pits. This site is on the EPA's list of the most contaminated sites in the country. The EPA claims the stte is slowly clearing itself of toxins. ·
Ml¥ ¥&-
NEW HANOVER
Virus
.found
$:k!#&ni-i.
' _, in dead:
'd NQRTH SUPERFUND .. I. -QA--·--·· :i;,...£)~<: ·-·· ... ~, ... -··. ... . . -· _,.
ID: SE? 13'99 15:12 No.005 ?.01
-..
-~ ',--, . , .. .... -' ..... ,.-',. ·-. , .. ,.
,ft . '. sr-a.•
•.· . . ",.1 ..
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY '
REGION IV -100 Alabama Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
ij 12. /9q TIME/DATE:
TO: -t1,, 1~ _ ;[s l:e Y 121a rJ
COMPANY/QRGANIZATION: 6/_(1_ ~ r i ·Q: ;,, "-IAf {¼ ~X-1A~ 2 .• a-dYL
PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: {1Lp ]33-Lf-8//
NUMBER OF PAGES SENT (Including this cover sheet): ,2!!) . Pc~Cj_,!!.,d · , TI
Please contact the person sending this tax If It is received poorly or Incomplete. I . .
'
FROM: J3e tk4-tr ~nJ .
NORTH SITE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Phone Numbers: (404) 562,8793
Fax Number: [phone]
COMMENTS:
• ---
'
,"'T'••-•• ., .. ·----'
I
I
' I
NORTH SUPERFUND
•' I'
ID: SEP 13'99 15:12 No.ODS P.02
4SES1J-El
u S~VTRONMENTAL PROTECTION AINCY
REGION 4 SCIENCE and ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT DlVlSlON ' . ATHENS, GEORGIA 30605-2700
SEP O 2 1999
rvlEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Potters Pits, Sandy Creek, North Carolina,
Potable Well Sampling.
SESD Project No. 99-0621.
FROM: Dan Thoman, Regional Expcrr:l., ~
Hazardous Waste Section
Tl-!RU Archie Lee, Chief / __ / '. J?. ~
Hazardous Waste Section { ... ..-('~"
TO Beverly Hudson
NSRI3
Waste Management Division
During the week of July 26, 1999, Hazardous Waste Section Personnel collect potable well
samples from five residences located around the Potters Pits Nl'L site in Sandy Creek, North
Carolina (Figure I) The names and addresses are listed in Table l. The samples were analyzed
for volatile organic compounds and metals. The analytical results are summarized in Table 2.
The anal)1ica\ data sheets indicating all compounds which were analyzed for and their appli~ab\e
d~te~tion limits are allachcd. The field parameters of pH, specific conductunce, ten1perature and
turbidity arc presented in Table 3.
Six samples were collected from five potable wells. Sample SA-PW is a dup\i~ate of 5-
PW. The wells are used to supply drinking water at all five residences. No volatile organic
compounds were detected in any of the samples.
A variety of metals was detected in the sampks including chromium, iron, lead mangRncse
and zinc Sample 1-PW, collected at the Harrison residence, contained 16 ug/1 of lead. The Safe
Drinking Water Act, Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for lead is 15 ug/1.
The Safe Drinking Water Act, Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) for
iron is 0.3 mg/1. The samples collected from the Grainger, Newlon and Causey residences
contuined 5.8 mg/I, 0.31 mg/I and 1.9 mg/1 of iron, rcspcclively. Sarnpk 3-PW, t:ollected
from the Grainger residence also contained 62 ug/1 of manganese which exceeds the SMCL of 50
mg/!. The sample from the Foster residence, 2-PW, was collected after passing through a water
softener system. It was not possible to collect a sample prior to the treatment system. The
Gra.ingcr and Causey residences also have water softener t.rcatmcnl systems. Samples at these
residences were coHected prior to the treatment system.
NQRTH SUPERFUND ID: SEP 13'99 15:13 No.005 P.03 • 2 •
The pH of all the samples was slightly acidic and ranged from 5.5 SU to 6.6 SU. The
specific conductance ranged from 99 umhos/cm to 489 umhus/cm. The turbidity ranged from
0.28 NTU to 3.7 NTU and the temperature from 20.0"C to 21.6'C.
The sampks were collected in accordance with the United St.ates Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, Science and Ecosystem Suppol'l Division, Environmental lnvqtigations
Standard Opcrnting Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual, May 1, 1996. All analyses were
conducted in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4,
Science and Ecosystt:m Support Division, Analytical Support Branch Operations and Quality
Control Manual, December, 1997.
If you have any questions or comments, please call me at [phone].
·,➔•~,--------------------. .
◊
A MW--101
''
,I A EPA--08
/ •• EPA-07 I / MW-201
,' ' !_;/
u
:l:
r.~= :<=~·-,......_____, --,. -~ -: ,-' ...
r----...
=0ster/ ·'
'---....;
/ / '---......J e EPA-04
S!TE
,.......,
L_/
MW-203 •
A MW-106
A -IW-110
·MW-2()6
• • MW-207 •
• r --
A MW-105
A MW-HJ< I
,~-,.• -~~ [ )
a 50 100 200
... (f)
C
7J
fT1
,Q
•1
C z
0
H
CJ
(/)
fT1
7J
U)
'-"
lJl
0 5L_ ________________________ __. z
0
~EPA Figure 1
Potters Pits Site Map
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
LEGEND:
e SHAU.OW WELL
.& OEEPWELL
0
0
lJl
7J
0
b
NORTH SUPERFUND . . .
Sample
Number
1-PW
2-PW
3-PW
4-PW
5-PW
'' I
ID: • 4
Tabk I
Name/ Atldress/Well Use
Potters Pits
SEP 13'99 •
Santly Creek, North Carolina
Use Resident Address
Information
Used for Rita Harrison 107 Hickory Dr
drinking water
Used for Angela Foster 110 Grainger Cir
drinking water
Used for Martha Grainger 112 Hickory Dr
drinking water
Used for Mr. Newlon 101 Hickory Dr
drinking water
Used for Juanita Causey 105 Grainger Cir
drinking water
15:14 No .005 P.05
Phone
Number
655-4905
655-1448
655-0817
HORTH .SUPERFUND ID: SEP 13'99 15:14 No .005 P.06 . . . ' •
Volatile Organic 1-PW
Compounds 7/27/1999
Harrison
5 •
Table 2
Analytical Data summary
Potters Pits
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
2-PW 3-PW 4-PW
7/27/1999 7/27/1999 7/27/1999
Foster Grainger Newlon
No volatile organic compounds were detected
Data Qualifiers
5-PW
7/27/1999
Cau~ey
A-Average value. NA-Not analyzed. NAl-lntt:rft:n:nces. J-Estimated value.
N-Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
NR-N ot Reported
K-Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L-Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U-Material was analyzed for but not detected,
SA-PW
7/27/1999
R-QC indicates that data unusable. Compound may or may nut be present. Resampling am!
reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-Confirmed by GCMS.
I. When no value is reported, see chlordane constituents.
2. Constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane.
METALS
6
Table 2 (cont)
Analytical Data Swnmary
Potters Pits, Sandy Creek, North carolina
Safe Drinking
Water Act
I-PW
07/27il999
MCL SMCL Harrison
2-PW 3-PW
07/27/1999 07/27/1999
Foster Grainger
4-PW 5-PW
07/27/1999 07/27/1999
Newlon Causey
SA-PW
07/27/1999
dup of 5-P\\'
;;:: .o
A)
-l
I
.. ,(/)
C v
[Tl
A)
" C z
0
f-------+---+--2_00_0_+---+-13_0 __ ----l--+---+,---+----1--f-----+-+-23 __ -+---+-2_3_-t--t. ;; BARIUM UG/L u 36 29
CALCIUM
CHROMfUM
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGJ\'ESIUM
MANGANESE
POTASSIUM
SODIUM
STRONTIUM
ZINC
Data Qualifiers
]-Estimated value.
MG/L
UG/L 100
UG/L 1300
MG/L 0.3
UG/L 15
MG/L
UG/L 50
MG/L
MG/L
UG/L
UG/L 5000
N-Presumptivc evidence of presence of mater
CT-Material was anal)rLed for but not detected.
16 u 85
u 2.0 2.6
6.2 5.1
0.11
2.4
1.6
1.7 0.062 1.8
53 89 12
130 U 420
21 7.4 9.2
50 1 I 11
LS U 1.0
U 19 u u
U 0.88 u u
0.75 0.75
16 16
0.97 0.86 0.88 (f)
rri -u
5.8 5.7 5.7 • ,~
0J
210 58 61 <.D co
14 8.7 u ,~
l/l
,~
Io.
z
0
0
0
l/l
-u
0
'1
,~QRTH, SUPERFUND ID: •
SHrnple Number pH
(SU)
1-PW 5.5
2-PW 5.6
3-PW 6.6
4-PW 6.5
5-PW 5.5
7
Table 3
Field PHrameters
Potters Pits
SEP 13'99 •
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
Conductivity Turbidity
(umhos/crn) (NTU)
382 0.28
384 0.31
489 0.82
287 3.7
99 0.9
15:15 No.005 P.08
Temperature
(OC)
23.1
23.6
21.7
21.9
20.0
vo&fltts skJDtl i2ktt§I§ @PX 1 Q@&IGA id §Q§S, JU I IZ!i&, SA &
Sample 7302 FY 1999 Project: 99--0621
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Pot1ers Prts
Program: SSF
Sandy Creek, NC
Id/Station: 1 PW .I
Media:POTABLE WATER
RESULTS UNITS
1.0U UG,'L
1.0U UGiL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGil
1.0U UGi'L
1.0U UGIL
5 OU UG/L
1.0U UG/L
25.U UGiL
2.5U UGil
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
25.U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGil
1.0U UG/L
1 .OU UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
2.5U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U VG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGil
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U VG/l
1.0U UG,'L
1.0U UG/L
1.0lJ UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE (1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
AC:=TONE
CARBON OISclLFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROEni.ANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
22-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROEIBANE
1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACl-'LORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DIBROMOMETnANE
TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,J-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMCFORM
BROMCBENZENE
1. 1 ,2,2-TETP.ACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHY-cENE)
1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE .
. Produced by: Allen, Frank
; Reqvestor:
! Project Leader: DTHOMAN
i Beginning: 07i27/1999 09:06
; Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
2.5U UGiL
1.0U UGiL
1.0U U(;/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG,1.
1.0U UG/1.
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U U~
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.ou UG/L
1.0U LJG/L
ANALYTE
METnYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1,1,12-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE
0-XYLENE
STYRENE
1,2,3-TRICKLCROPROPANE
0-CHLOROTOLVENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLCROBENZENE
1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
N-PROPYLBENZENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
SEC-BVTYLBENZENE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE
N-BUTYLB:=NZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1.2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOR0-1,3-BUTADIEN E
1.2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyz-ed_ NA:-·;n"e:ferie~ces. J-esti:11ate::fval\Je. N-presumptive evidenoe if ':Jreser.ce of ma~fiaL
K-ac:ual value is known lo be less e-ian va(i.;e given. L..actual v.2:lue is known to be greater than value 9rvef't. U--!llate:ial was analyzee'. for but not Ce~cte<!. rie m..m1:Jer is the minimum r;i.;an~rat-Ql'l li:rirt.
R-qc indicat,r:s that data ~nusat!~. corr,;x:,un~ may or may r1ot :be present. resamoling ar.-c r-e.ana·ys1s is ;ieces.sary for vert'icaticn.
C--cor.fim:e<: by gems: 1.when no value is r"?::-orted, see ct lor-dane _ccnstituents 2.cor---S~er-:s or rr.,et;;;bolites :,f ~echnica' chlord-3r.e
•
·O
A)
-l :c
z
U)
[Tl ·u
,-
0J
co co
,-
Vl
,_,
Vl
z
0
0
0
Vl
·o
0 co
S.ample 7305 FY 1999 Project: :t!l--0621
VO\.ATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits Sandy Creek, NC
Program: SSF
ld/Stalion:2PW I
Media:POTABLE WATER
RESULTS
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
5.0U
1.0U
25.U
2.SU
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
25.U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
2.SU
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
· 1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
UNITS
UG'l
UG/L
UG/1_
UG"c
UGn_
UG/l
UG/L
VG/L
VG/L
UG/L
UGil
VGil
UGil
UGiL
UG'L
UG•1.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/l
UG'\.
UG'\.
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGiL
UG/L
UG.1L
UG/L
UG/L
VG.IL
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETl-'ANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1, 1.1-TRICHLORO::THANE
1, 1-DICHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
OIBROMOMETHANE
TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROP ROPEN E
TRICHLOROETHENE fTRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1.1,2-TRICHLOROE<KANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
BROM06ENZENE
1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE{TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,:,..DICHLOROPROPANE
RESULTS
2.5U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
Produced by: Allen, Frank
Reques1or:
. Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 07127/1999 10:00
Ending:
UNITS
UGIL
VGil
UG11.
UG/l UGIL UGIL
UGiL
UG/L
LJG/l
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL LiGIL
UGIL
UGil
UGIL
\JG/L
UGll.
UG'l
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGll
UG/l
UG/l
UG/l
UG/L
ANALYTE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1, 1. 1 ,2. TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
(M-ANDIOR P-)XYLENE
0-XYLENE
STYRENE
1 ,2,:,.. TRICHLOROPROPANE
0-CHLOROTOLUENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2-0IBROMOETHANE (EDB)
ISOPROPYLBENZEN!:
N-PROPYLBENZENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
TE RT-BUTYLBENZENE
1.2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE
N-BUTYLBENZENE
1.2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1.2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOR0-1,:,..suTADIENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-avert.~ value. NA-'1or analyzed. NAl-i:iterfe~nces. J-<'S-jm.a::e,d vaJL .. ,,e_ N-presumptive evicence of presence of material.
K-actual value is Kno«n to be less ~an value gi'ie."1. l-actu.:!.1 value is 1movm tc be Q"eate!" than "'alue given. U-cnatenal was ar..alyzed tcr but no~ Cetected. the numtier is !he minimum qUa:1titation li-:Tltt
R-qc indi"Cat"?S tiat dat2. urusc:ble. compound may or .'Tlay not be preser:L :esampli~;;;i and reanalysis is neceSSc!.ry for v<i!rific.':ltion.
C-confirmed :Jy gems: 1 . ...r.ler rY.> vah.:e is r~por.eC. see ~fordane C011stituen~ 2.cons~tuen!s or metabolites of ~.:iical dll-ordane
•
-0
"' -j
I
(/)
C
" rri
"' 77
C z
CJ
(/)
C'l
" -v-l
'° co
,~
Vl
,-·
0,
z
0
0
0
Ul
·o
,-'
0
-. ---------" ~
. . ,,. ~
Sample 7306 FY 1999 Project: ~-0~21
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits &mdy Creek, NC
Program: SSF
Id/Station: JPW /
Media: POTABLE WATER
RESULTS UNITS
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U VG/L
1.0U UGIL
5.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
25.U UGIL
2.5U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
25.U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.DU UG/L
1.0U UG,L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
t.OV UG/L
1.0V UGIL
2.5V UGIL
1.0V VG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0V UGIL
1.DU UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U VG.IL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE (t, 1-DICHLOi'lOETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFlDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
CJS-t .2-D1 CHLOROETHEN E
2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DI BROMOMETHANE
TRANS-1.3-0 ICH LOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE [TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHAN E
CIS-1,3-DICHL OROP ROPENE
BROMOFORM
BROMOBENZENE
1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
. -.
Produced by: Allen. Frank
Requester.
Prnjeci Leadff DTI-iOMAN
· Beginning: 07/27/1999 10:05
· Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
2.5U Ul3/L
1.0V UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U iJGJL
1.0V UGIL
t.OU L!GIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U VG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
t.OU UG/L
1.0V VG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
ANALYTE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1.1, 1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
(M· AND/OR P-)XYLENE
0-X:YLENE
STYRENE
1,2 ,3-TRI CHLOROPROPANE
0-CHLOROTOLUENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.4-0ICHLOROBENZ!:NE
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
N-PROPYLBENZENE
1,3 .~ TRIMErHYLBENZENE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE
12,4-TRI METHYLBENZEN E
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE
P-ISOPROPYL TOLU!:NE
N-BUTYLBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOR0-1,3-BUTADIENE
1.2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-.average value. NA-rxrt analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estir.ia;ed value. N-presumptive evkfenc;e of presence of material.
K--actual va[ve is know.i to .be less than value ,given. l-actuar value is known to be greatef than Yolue gfVen. LJ-mate.rial was-an2tyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantit.2Lion 1:mi~
R--qc indica~es that data unusable. compound may or may not be Dresenl resampling and reanalysis is-necessary for venficaticn.
C--confirmed by yans: 1.when no value is reported. SP.e ctilordane constituents 2.const:Jtuents or meta~lites of tedln~r chlordane
,r;::i ;u
-l
:r::
(f)
C
7J
f'l ;u
·q
C z
0
•
>-<
CJ
(f)
f'l ·o • ~
(,N
'° '°
•-· (.fl
en
z
0
0
0
(.fl
·o
,~
•-·
------------. . . . . -
Sample 7307 FY 1999 Project: 99-0£21
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: 4PW I
Sandy Creek, NC
Med;~: POTABLE WATER
RES UL TS UNITS
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
5.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
25.U UGIL
2.5U UGIL
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/l
25.U UG/l
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
2.5U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
LOU UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0V UG/L
1.0V UG/l
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
TBICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETI-IYLENE)
ACETONE
GARB.ON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1, 1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DIBROMOMETHANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DI BRO MOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1.2-TRI CHLOROETHANE
CIS-U-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
BROMOBENZENE
1. 1 ,2 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
Produce<J by: Allen, Frank
Requestor:
Projecf Leader: DTHOMAN
'. Beginning: 0712711999 11:40
' Ending:
RESULTS Utl!TS
2.5U LIGIL
1.0U µGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L ,.ou UG/l
1.0U UG/l
1.0U t.iGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
1.0U l!G/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
t.0U UGI\.
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/l
1 .OU UG/L
ANALYTE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1, 1, 1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE
O-XYLENE
STYRENE
1.2 ,3-TRICH LOROPROPAN E
0-CHLOROTOLUENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1,3-OICHLOROBENZENE
1,4,0ICHLOROBENZEN E
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
N-PROPYLBENZENE
1,3 ,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE
P-ISOPROPYL TOLUENE
N-BUTYUlE NZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (OBCP)
1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOR0-1,3-BUTADIENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-averdge value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferenccs. J--estimated value_ N-;;resumptive eviderice of presence of material.
K---actual value is k~ to be fess ttian value given. L-actual value is known lo be grea~ than value gNen. l.J-lnaterial Was analyzed toe--but not 64!!-ected. the number ts the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc iOOica~ that data t.musable. co,npound may or may not be present. re.sampling and re.analysis is n-eccssary tor verifiC.1ti011.
C-confimiied ?:Py gems: 1.wtien no value 1s rcpor".ed. see ct,l,ordane 0011stituents 2.oonst1uents or rn-etz.bolites of technical chlordane
V,
fT]
" • ~· 0J
w w
,~
lJl
" :z
0
0
0
lJl
" ~· tv
Sample 7308 FY 1999 Project: 99-0621
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
ld/Station:5pw I
Media:POTABLE WATER
Sandy Creek. NC
RESULTS
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
5.0U
1.0U
25.U
2.5U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
25.U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
2.5U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
UNITS
UGI\.
UGIL
UGIL
UG1l
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
·uG.I\.
UG/l.
UGI\.
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/l
UGIL
UG/l
UG/l
UG/l
VG/l
UG,'l
UGJl
UG/l.
UGI\.
UGIL
UG/l
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGI\.
UG/l
UG/l
UGIL
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMflHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROM ETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYlENE CHLORIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE ( 1, 1-DI CHLOROETHYlENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROElliANE
1. 1-DICHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DIBROMOMETHANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROP ROPE NE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
.1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-D ICHLOROP ROPE NE
BROMOFORM
BROMOBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETP-ACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
Produced t,y: Allen, Frank
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
B<,ginning: 07/27/1999 12:15
Ending:
RESUl TS Ul'IITS
2.5U UG/L
1.0U LiGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/1.
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0V UG/l.
1.0V UG/L
1.0U UG/l
1.0V UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U \JG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/l
ANALYTE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1, 1, 1,2-TETRACHLOROETHAN E
ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)xYLENE
O-XYLENE
STYRENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
0-CHLOROfOLUENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
N-PROPYLBENZEN E
1, 3.5-TRIM ETHYLBENZENE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE
1.2.4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE
P-ISOPROPYL TOLUENE
N-BUTYLBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUT ADIE NE
12,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A--aver-dge value. NA-not analyzed_ NAl--interfere~res. J-estimated value. N-pre.sumptive evfdence of preseflce of material.
K-ad\Jal val:.1e is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is knO'NO 10 be greater than value given. U-material was analyLed fur but not detected. the number is the min:r.iur:i quantit.a'Jon limiL
R-qc in<fica.tes ~at data unusz.Ole. com;::iaund m2.y or may not be presenl res.ampling and reanalysis is necessary for ve,rificaticii.
C-confirrned by -gc:ns: 1 .wh-en no value is reported. see chlordane cor1s:ituents 2.constih.JMts or metabolites of technie2I chlorda11e
•
·Z
.p
;u
--1 ::r:
.• (f)
C 7J
rTJ ;u
'7
C z
0
(f)
rTJ
7J -"' ,o
u)
•-· UI -" z
0
0
0
U7
7J -"'
L Ii 112212 :C 23 IE
Sample 7309 FY 1999 Project 99-0621
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Sandy Creek, NC
Id/Station: 5AF'W I
Media:POTABLE WATER
RES UL TS UNITS
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
5.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
25.U UGIL
2.5U UG/l
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UGIL
25.U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
2.SU UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1,0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UGIL
1.0V UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMElHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1 _.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1, 1-DICHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DIBROMOMETHANE
TRANS-1,3--DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3--DICHLOROPROPENE
BROM OF ORM
BROMOBENZENE
1, 1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
RESULTS
2.5U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1 OU
1.DU
1.0U
1 OU
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
A--avefage value. NA-not 2nalyzec'. NAl~nterfercnoes. J--es~mated value. N-presumptive ~ence of presence of material.
Produced by: Allen, Frank
: Requestor:
: Project Leader. DTHOMAN
: Beginning: 07/27/H,99 12:18
Ending:
Ul)IITS
LIGIL
UG/l
UG/l
UGIL
UGIL
lK;IL
UGIL
\JG/1..
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
lJG/l UGIL
l/GIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UGIL
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
ANALYTE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1.1, 1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
[M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE
0-XYLENE
STYRENE
1.2.:l--TRICHLOROPROPANE
0-CHLOROTOLUENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1.3-0ICHLOROBENZENE
1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZEN E
1.2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
N-PROPYLBENZENE
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLU ENE
N-BUTYlBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1.2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOR0-1,3--BUTADIENE
1.2,:l--TRICHLOROBENZENE
K--actual V;]lue Is. k,-,awn to be less than v;JltJe gi~. L-actual vafue lS known to be grea~ than value gNen. U-r,ate(ial was analy~ to,-but llOt detected. ,tic numbef is the minimum qu.an.titation limit.
R-qc iridica'.:?s that dat.I unvsabfo. compound may or may not be preserit. resampting and reanalysis is necessary fOt" verificaticn.
C--cof'lflrmed by gcrns.: 1. when no value tS reported, s.ee -chrordane oonstit.uents 2.cons~uents or mctclbolites of technical chlordane
•
.. U)
C v
fTl
7)
Tl
C z
CJ
U)
[Tl v -0-l
co co
~· Ul
,~
00
z
0
0
0
Ul
v
,~
to,
Sample 7304 FY 1999 Project: 99--0621
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: 1PTB I
Sandy Creek. NC
Media: TRIP BLANK -WATER
RESULTS
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U ,.au
5.0U
1.0U
25.U
2.5U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
25.U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U ,.ou
1.0U
1 .OU
2.SU ,.ou
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
UNITS
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
VGIL
VGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/1.
UGIL
UG/l
VGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1-0ICHLOROETHENE (1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL ElHYl KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1, 1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DIBROMOM.ETHANE
TRANS-1.:.-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE [TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
D IBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
BROMOBENZENE
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHEN E ( TETRACH LOROETHYLE NE)
1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE
RESULTS
2.SU
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1,0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
Produe<o<J by: Allen, Frank
Requestor:
Pro;ect Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 07/27/1999 09:25
Endir,g:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
l.}GIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
LiGJL
UG/L
UG/l
i.:G/L
llG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/l
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
ANALYTE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
1.1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHAN E
ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE
0-XYLENE
STYRENE
1.2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
O-CHLOROTOLUENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZEN E
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE ·
1.2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
N-PROPYLEENZENE
1,3,$-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
TERT-BUTYLBENZENE
1.2,4-TRIMETHYlBENZENE
SEC-BUTYl BENZENE
P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE
N-BVTYLBENZENE
1,2-D IBROMO-:.-CHLOROPROPAN E (DBCP)
1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE
1.2.3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA.not analyzed. NAl-interferenoes. J-estimated valve. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K--actual value \S knO'HO to be less 1han value given. L-actual vafue is known to be grealer than Y.llue gr.ren. LJ-material-was anz!yzed fof but not detected. the numb~r is the minimum quanUtatioo limit.
R-oc irldicates that data unusable. compound :nay or rnay not be pres-eril resampling and reana:ysis is necessary far ve(r:icatic<1.
C-c:o:ifirmej by guns: 1 .when no value is reported, see chlCN"dane OY1s"Jtuents 2.constitue:-ts or metabc'it~ cf technicat chtordane
•
•
(/)
C -o
r'l
A)
77
C z
t:J
(/)
r'l
" .~
(.,J
lD co
-Ul
~·
lD
z
0
0
0
Ul
<]
Ul
. ------~ , -~ . -------... ---. -----. --
Sample 7302 FY 1999 Project: 99-0£21
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: 1 PW I
Sanoy Creek, NC
Media: POTABLE WATER
RESULTS UNITS
1.0U
1.0U
NA
130
0.20U
0.20U
1.0U
1.0U
62
1.0U
1.0U
16
O.SOU
1.0U
1.0U
130
1.0U
1.0U
0.20U
1.0U
1.0U
21
NA
O.ZOU
100U
1.6
16
2.4
0.11
53
1.7
VG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/l
UG/l
UG/l
UG/L
UG/l
UG/l
UGIL.
UG/L
UGJL
UGIL
UG/l
UGIL
UGIL
UGiL
UG/L
UGIL
MGJL
MG/l
MGIL
MGJL
MGJL
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
Produced by: Wasko. Mike
, Requestor:
( Project Leader: DTHOMAN
: Beginning: 07/2711999 09:06
, Ending:
A-aver.age value. NA-nae analyzec'. NA!-intcrferenoes. J-e~irnated value. N-presumptivc evidence of _presence of material.
K-actuat vaPue is knOW'fl to be ress th.an vafue given. L-actv21 value rS kllC"tlf!l to be greater lhan value given. U-material was analJZe-d for but not detected. tnc num~ is the fmnimum quanbtation limit
R-QC indicates that 02.ti unusa~ie. co:rr.~)! .. Jnd may or may not be pres.-ent. resamplin,g ,300 reana;y5is is necessary fOI' verifi(;.a'j,ort
C-cor,firmed by gans: bvhen no value is reported, see dilordane constituents 2.o:x1slituents or rnetaboli!es o1 tectmical dllorciane
•
•
·~
-l :r:
(/)
C
7J
rri
Al
77
C z
CJ
(/)
r'l ·o
,~
0J
co co
~· Vl
,~
co
z
0
0
0
Vl
7J
o,
~ ~-------·--· ·--.. -i . -,
Samefe 7305 FY 1999 Project: 99--0621
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: 2PW /
Sandy Oeek, NC
Media: POTABLE WATER
RE SUL TS UNITS
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
NA UGIL
O.SOU-UGIL
0.2QU UG/L
0.20U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
2.0 UG/L
5. 1 UGIL
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG/l
0.62 UGIL
O.SOU UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
1.0U UGl"L
1.0U UGIL
7.4 UGIL
NA UGIL
0.20U UGIL
,OOU UG/L
1.0U UG/L
0.040U MG/l
0.10U MG/L
0.040U MGIL
89 MGIL
0.062 MGIL
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENlUM
TlN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
Produce<l by: Wasko. Mike
: Requestor:
i Project leader. DTHOMAN
: Beginning: 07/27.11999 10:00
: Ending:
A-average vah,e. NA.not analy.ze::L NAl---interterences. J-estmc.ted value. N-presumotive eviderice of prese'lce of mate-rial.
K-actual valv-e is known D be less than vafue grV'efl. L-ac'l.Jal value Is knovvn to be greater tnan value 9wen. U---rnaterial was anafyz.ed for bul not detected. trie number is the minnTiur., quantit:3tion limit.
R--qc indicates that Cata unusable_ compOtmd may°' may not be present. resampling and reanalysis i:s necessary for verificatioo.
C--corifinned by gems: 1.when r10 ,..alue is reported, see chlordane cxmstrtuents 2.constitueots or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
.z
D
Al
----j :r:
(f)
C
-0
fTI
70
77
C z
C,
(/)
r,7 -o -0-J
co co
-lJl
rv
0
z
D
0
0
Ul
-o
•-·
"
Sample 7306 FY 19'39 Pmject: 99--0621
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
ld/Station:3pw I
Media:POTABLE WATER
5'mdy Creek, NC
RESULTS UNITS
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
NA UG/L
36 UG.'L
0.20U UGIL
0.20U UG/L
1.0U UGIL
2.5 UGIL
1.0U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG.'L a.sou UGIL
0.50U UG.'L
1.0U UG/L
I.OU UG.'L
420 UG.'L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
0.20U UGIL
1.0U UG.'L
1.0U UG/L
9.2 UGIL
NA UG/L
0.20U UG/L
100U UG/L
62 UG/L
B5 MG/l
2.8 MG/l
5.8 MG/L
12 MG/L
1 _8 MG.IL
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENJG
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
· TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
Prod~oed by: Wasko, Mike
Requestor:
Project Leade~ OT HOMAN
Beginning: 07/27/1999 10:05
Ending:
A-avera~ vatve. NA-not analyzed. NAl~ntroerences. J-estimated va.lue. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value is known to be less :t'lan value given_ L-actual value is k.nO\-Yfl 10 be greater than vait.le given. U-material w~ anaryzed for but oot dc!ectcd. the oum!}er is the minimum quantitat.iOfl limit.
R--qc indi~t-es that data unusa blc. compound may or rnay not be present. resamp!ing and rearialys:.s. is necessary for verification.
C--confin-ned by gems: 1.wtien no va•ue is re;:x,rted, see chfordane constituents 2. COf1stituents or metabolites of tedlriical cflfordane
•
•
·Z
D 7)
-;
I
(f)
C
" rn
Al -,i
C z
0
H
0
(f)
rn
"
~
V,
,o
U)
,~
Vl
t0
0
z
D
0
0
Vl
"
00
Sample 7307 FY 1999 Project: 99--0621
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
PrOl)ram: SSF
ld/Sta~on: 4PW I
Sandy Creek, NC
Media: POTABLE WATER
RESULTS
1.0U
1.0U
NA
29
0.20U
0.20U
. 1.0U
1.5
11l
1.0U
1.0U
0.88 a.sou
1.0U
1.0U
210
1.0U
1.0U
0.20U
1.0U
1.0U
14
NA
0.20U
100U
23
50
2.1
0.31
5.8
0.97
UNITS
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/l.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
VG/L
UG/L
UG/L
VGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGiL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
VGIL
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
MG/L
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
Produc,,d by: Wasko. Mike
Requestm:
' Project Leader DTHOMAN
: Beginning: 07/27/1999 11:40
: Endir,g:
A-aver3:9e value. NA-not anatyzt.-C. NAl--interferences. J-estirna~d value. N-presumptr.-e evidence of prESence of material.
K-actual value is known to t>e less ttian value given. L--actu<1I value is known to b€ greater than value given. U--mat~al was analyzed for tiut not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-Qc indtea.tes that data i.mu~ble. compot..md may or may not be pre-sent resampling arid reanalysis is necessary for 11en.ficati:il".
C-coflfirrncd by gems: 1 .'n'hcn no value is repor1E?d, see dllordane const"tuen!.s 2.ronsUtuents or me~bolites of techni-cal ctilorda"rte
•
•
,z
D
Al
--l :r:
(/)
C v rci
Al
" C z
C)
H
0
(/)
[Tl -u
,~
01
\.0 ,o
,~
Ul
N
0
z
0
0
0
Ul
v
,o
Sample 7308 FY 1999 Project 99-0621
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: 5F'W I
Sandy Creek. NC
Media: POTABLE WATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
1 OU UG/L SILVER
1.0U UG/L ARSENIC
NA UG/L BORON
23 UGIL BARIUM
0.20U UGIL BERYLLIUM
0.20U UG/l CADMIUM
1.0U UG/L COBALT
1.0U UGIL CHROMIUM
1.0U UG/L COPPER
1.0U UGIL MOLYBDENUM
1.0U UG/L NICKEL
0.S!JU UGIL LEAD
0.50U UGiL ANTIMONY
1.0U UG/L SELENIUM
1.0U UG/L TIN
58 UGiL STRONTIUM
1.0U UG/L TELLURIUM
1.0U UGI\_ TITANIUM
0.20U VG/L THALLIUM
1.0U VG/L VANADIUM
1.0U UG/L YTTRIUM
8.7 VG/L ZINC
NA UG/L ZIRCONIUM
0.2DU UGIL TOTAL MERCURY
1D0U UG/L ALUMINUM
16 UG/L MANGANESE
11 MG/L CALCIUM
0.75 MGIL MAGNESIUM
1.9 MG/L IRON
5.7 MG/L SODIUM
-0.86 MG/L POTASSIUM
Produced by: Wasko, Mike
~ Requcstor.
: Project leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 07127./1999 12:15
: Ending:
A-cJVerage valt.:e. r-.A-not an.alyz:ect NAl-\nterterences. J-estlmated value. N-;,resumptive e-vk1er-ce of presence of material.
K-actual value is knC1W11 lo be less. t.han value given. L-aciual value is known to be greater -than value given_ U-material was anao/led for but rlOt detected. the numbe(' is the minimum quanti!.atioo ltmil
R-qc tMicares that da:a unusab~-com;x:mm:, may Of may rKJt be present. resampling and reanaly~s ls neoessary for ve:rffication.
C----confirrncd by gcrns: 1.wt,en :10 value is reOOr'.ed. see ctibrdarie constituents 2.oonstitueri:.S or metabolites of techni03I <:;tilorde".ne
•
•
·z
D
'° ----l
I
(f)
C
7J rn
Al
77
C z
CJ
H
CJ
(f)
C'l
" ~·
0J
ill
ill
~· Vl
t0 ~·
z
0
0
0
Vl
7J
t0
0
S2mple 7309 FY 1999 Project 99--0621
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
l<J/Station:sAPW I
Media:PQTABLE WATER
Sandy Creek, NC
RESULTS
1.0U
1.0U
NA
23
0.20U
0.20U
1.0U
1.0
1.0U
1.0U
1.0U
0.50U
0.50U ,.ou
1.0U
61
1.0U
1.0U
0.20U
1.0U
1.0U u
NA
0.20U
!OOU
16
11
0.75
2.0
5.7
0.88
UNITS
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG.'L
UGIL
UG.'L
UGIL
UG/l
UG/l ·
UG/l
UGll
UGIL
UG/l
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/l
MG/L
MGIL
MGIL
MG/L
MG/L
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BORON
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROM1UM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUM1NUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
Produced by: Wasko, Mike
Requestor.
Project leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 07/2711999 12:1 B
Ending:
A-average value. NA-no\ analyzed. NAl-interfureriocs. J-estima!ed va!ue. N-presumptive evidence o~ pre.sen et! of matefial.
K-actual value is knov,,n to~ lesS than value given. L-act\Jal vah..1e is known to be greater than value givef'l. U--materiaf w2.S anal)'Ze-:l for but not rteteci.ed. the number is the rninhnurn quantitation limil
R---Qc indicates that data unusable. com;xxmd may or may net be pres.ent. res.ampling and reanalysis is necessary for verific:atior'L
C-c:onfirrncd by gems: 1. wtien no value is reported, see -chkJrdanc constituents 2.constituents or metat>olites of tectm1ca1 chlordane
•
•
.z
D
,0
-i :r: .
(./)
C
7J
rT7
,0 -,.,
C z
0
0
(/)
r--r-1 -o ~-
0J
'° '°
-lJl
rv -z
0
0
0
lJl
7J
rv
. . ·;.~=.;,:--__ . -----------.
Sample 7303 FY 1999 Project: 99--0621
METALS SCAN
Facilrty: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: 1 PWB I
Sandy Creek, NC
Media: PRESERVATIVE BLANK
RE SUL TS UNITS
1.0U UGil
1.0U UG/l
NA UG/L
2.5V VG.IL
0.20U UG/l
0.20U UGil
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UGil
1.0U UG,'L
0.50U UG'L
0 50U UG/l
1.0U UG/l
1.0U UG."l
1.0U UG'L
1.0U VG/L
1.0U UG/l
0.20U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
1.0U UG/l
5.0U UG/L
NA UG/L
0.20U UG'L
100U UGiL
1.0U UG/L
0.040U MG/L a.,ou MGIL
0.040U MG.IL
0.10U MG/L
0.040U MG.IL
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BORON
BARlUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
TIN
STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM
TITANIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
ZIRCONIUM
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
A-average Ydlue. NA-nal analyzed. NAl--interferences. J-eslima1ed v.al..Je. N-presurnptive ev·Kferice of presence of ma:erial
. Produced by: Wasko. Mike
[ Rcquestor.
i Project leader: DTHOMAN
: Beginning: 07/27/1999 09:20
: Ending:
K-a<:Wal value is knO'Wtl to De !ess than value given. L-actual vali.re is known to be gr-eater than value given. U-materfal was anal"yzed for but not detecled. the nurrt>er i:s ttie minim\Jm Quantrl.alion lirntt
R-QC indicates !hal dat.a un·Jsable. compound may or may not be present. resamplin,g and reanalysis is necessary for verificaliOfl.
C-COflfirm~ by gems: ·1.when no value is reported, see chlordane oonstituen:S 2.COflstituents or metabolites oftectmical d'lrard~ne
•
D • A)
-< ::r:
(f)
C ·u
rT7
A)
Tl
C z e,
(f)
fT] -u -vJ
cD
cD
,~
Vl
N ,~
z
0
0
0
Ul
-u
N
N
; • U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4, SCIENCE and ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT DIVISION
. ATHENS, GEORGIA 30605-2700
RECEIVED
4SES-EI
MEMORANDUM
FEB 1 8 1999 MAR _ 11999
SUPERFUND SECTION
SUBJECT:
FROM:
THRU:
TO:
Pottefs Pits,, Field Investigation Report.
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
SESD Project No. 99-0068. / ~ j,
Dan Thoman, Regional Expv-J
Hazardous Waste Sect~ion _ .
Archie Lee, Chief
Hazardous Waste Sec on
Beverly Hudson
NSRB
Waste Management Division
Attached is the field investigation report for the Potters Pits NPL Site in Sandy Creek;
North Carolina. Three contaminants were detected at concentrations which exceeded the
remediation goals as specified in the Record of Decision. Wells EPA002, MW-i06, MW-110 and
MW-203 contained 8 ug/1, 3 ug/1, 11 ug/1 and 29 ug/1 of benzene, respectively. The remediation
goal for benzene is 5 ug/1. Well MW-203 contained 93 ug/1 of ethyl benzene. The remediation
goal for ethyl benzene is 29 ug/l. Chromium was detected in well MW-201 at a concentration of
15 ug/1, which equals the remediation goal.
The contaminants and concentrations detected during the May, 1998 and December,
· 1998, field investigations are similar. While the contaminants with remediation goals were
detected at slightly higher concentrations during the December field investigation, only four wells
showed any organic contamination as opposed to the May field investigation during which six
wells contained organic contaminants. A possible explanation is that the May field investigation
was conducted during a period of almost flood conditions, while the December field investigation
was conducted after a several month dry spell. •
If you have any questions or comments, please call me at [phone].
Attachment
• •
·' .
POTTER'.S SEPTIC TANK SERVICES PITS SITE
SANDY CREEK, NORTH CAROLINA
Field Investigation Report
February 1999
Introduction
During the Week of December 7, 1998, US-EPA, Region 4, Science and ,Ecosyste!ll
Support Division (SESD), Hazardous Waste Section, conducted a field investigation at the . : . '. ·~ \.
Potter's Septic Tank Services Pits site in Sandy Creek, North Carolina, as requested by the t
Waste··Management Division:
The field investigation was conducted to delineate contamination in the upper and lower
aquifers. The information generated from this field investigation will be used tq.evaluate the
" ,. ~., • I
need for additional aquifer properties testing and to establish a basis for the design of the upper
and lower aquifer recovery systems.
Background
The Potter's Pits site is located in a rural area of Brunswick County in the residential
community of Sandy Creek Acres ~ubdivision near the intersection of US 74/76 and NC 87
west of Maco, North Carolina (see Figure I). There are approximately 150 residential lots in
the vicinity of the site; at the time of the Record of Decision, 70 of these lots were occupied.
Prior to residential development of the site, the Skipper family operated sludge hauling
and oil spill cleanup companies in the area, Disposal practices included placing waste
petroleum products and septic tank sludge in shallow unlined pits or directly on land surface.
The pits were used from about 1969 through 1976. In August, 1976 an unlined disposal pit
reportedly breached and approximately 20,000 gallons of oil were released. The oil entered
Chinnis Branch and was transported down stream to Rattlesnake Branch.
-1-
,.
'-.•. \\
·-.,____ ____ ._
0 t996 DcLonnC Street Atlas USA
+ Sandy Run M~?i
/
11! snalJeBay __ /
/
/
'.\
87
/
.,
/
igure 1
Potter'§.Pl~s Site Location Map
./ \ / andy Creek,_;North Ca\:olina
\.,
;
'
i ·,
\
\
'.
•
Sampling Methodology
Thirteen ground water samples were collected from i2 permanent monitor wells located
around the perimeter of the site. Figure 2 indicates the locations of the monitor w~lls
sampled. The wells were purged with peristaltic pumps to minimize tµrbidity. After purging . . .
the required volum~ and achieving stabilization ~f pH, temp~r~ture, c;;nductivity;imct'turbid'ity,
samples for metals analysis were collected from the discharge tubing of,the peristaltic pump,,
Samples for volatile organic compound analysis were collected directly from the teflon tubing.
Table 1 lists the wells sampled, the corresponding sample number, total, depth, depth to water
and the well diameter and construction material. Wells less than 20 feet deep are designated as
shallow while wells equal to or greater than 20 feet deep are designated as deep wells.
The ground water samples were labeled as follows. The first two letters will be
"PP", for Potter's Pit. The "PP" is followed by a three digit alphanumeric code which
correspond to the designations on Figure 2 for the various sampling locations. Tlie final two
letters will be "GW" for the ground water samples. For example, PP-205-GW indicates a
ground water sample collected from monitor well 205. Sample PP-202-GWD is a duplicate of
sample PP-202-GW. Samples PP-001-TB, PP-002-TB and PP-003-PB (see Appendix A) are
quality assurance/quality control samples. When discussing analytical results for individual
samples the "PP" and leading O's will be omitted (e.g., PP-002-GW will be referred to as 2-
GW).
Four monitor wells targeted for sampling in the work plan were not sampled. Wells
MW-102, MW-206 and MW-207 were in a severely flooded area and either could not be
reached or were under water. Monitor well MW-105 could not be located by the sampling
team.
Samples were collected and handled in accordance with the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Science and Ecosystem Support Division,
Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual,
May 1, 1996. Samples were analyzed according to the Analytical Support Branch Operations
and Quality Control Manual, December, 1997 and/or the CLP Statement of Work.
-3-
D
◊
& MW-101
MW-202 •
• EPA-04
MW-203 •
& MW-106
& MW-105
N
i 0
a so 100 200 ~~-~~"""! .. ·"•:,···· ....... ....-...; ,ScaleinFNl -·
. ··1
il_~----------~--'-----··· ____ __,
siiEPA Figure 2
Potters Pits Site Map
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
LEGEND:
• SHALLOW WELL
& DEEPWELL
• • ' ,,: '. Table 1 • • ' t
Monitor Well Sampli!}g_Location·Designations
Shallow Monitor Wells
'
. '
Well Sample
Number Number
EPA-02 PP-002-GW
EPA-07 PP-007-GW
MW-201 PP-201-GW
MW-202 PP-202-GW
MW-203 PP-203-GW
Deep Monitor Wells
Well Sample
Number Number
EPA-04 PP-004-GW
EPA-08 PP-008-GW
MW-IOI PP-101-GW
MW-104 PP-104-GW
MW-106 PP-106-GW
MW-110 PP-110-GW
MW-111 PP-111-GW
1 -Polyvinyl chloride
2 -Stainless Steel
Potter's Septic Tank Services Pits ·
Sandy Creek, North Carolina .. :,
' .... .. ,,;
Total Depth Depth to Water
(ft\ (ft\
10.65 4.06
17.4 11.9
18.3 9.65
13.5 10.2
15.34 5.8
Total Depth Depth to Water
(ft) (ft)
27.0 0.85
30.15 14.2
38.12 12.5
35.65 9.25
22.82 4.90
28.72 4.56
21.1 5.38
-5-
..:: ·~
Casing Diameter (in) /
Construction Material
2 / PVC1
2 / PVC
2 / PVC
2/ PVC
2 / PVC
C~-~ing Diameter (in) /
Construction Material
2 1 ss2
2 / PVC
2 / ss
2 / PVC
2 / PVC
2 /SS
2 / ss .
• • Results and Discussion
i I .. : I ;·,
1 . ., •••
_} ·-·· '
Thirteen ground water samples were collected from 12 permanent monitor wells located
around the site. Figure 2 indic~tes the sample collection locations. The samples were
analyzed for volatile organic compounds and metals. The analytical results are presented _in
Table 2. The analytical data sb'eets, inclu\liiig applic_a~le detection limits are presented iri
Appendix A.
Volatile Organic Compounds
Volatile organic compounds were detected in the samples from four wells. Sample 2-
GW contained 8J ug/1 of benzene, 3J ug/1 of xylenes, and three additional unspecified
compounds. Benzene was detected in sample 106-GW at a concentration of 3J ug/1. Sample
110-GW contained 11 ug/1 of benzene, 7J ug/1 of total xylenes and the evidence of three
additional compounds. Sample 203-GW contained benzene, ethy!benzene, toluene and
xylenes at concentrations of 29 ug/1, 93 ug/1, 11 ug/1 and 200 ug/1, respectively. The
presumptiv~ evidence of seven additionai compounds and two unspecified compounds were
also detected in sample 203-GW.
The concentration of two compounds, benzene and ethyl benzene, exceeded the ground
water remediation goals specified in the Record of Decision(3). The remediation goal for
benzene is 5 ug/1 and ethyl benzene is 29 ug/1. Sample 2-GW, 106-GW, 110-GW and 203-
GW contained 8 ug/1, 3 ug/1, llug/1 and 29 ug/1 of benzene, respectively. Sample 203-GW
contained 93 ug/1 of ethyl benzene.
During the May, 1998 field investigation the only compound which exceeded the
ground water remediation goals was benzene. Sample 2-GW and 110-GW contained 11 ug/1
and 13 ug/1 of benzene, respectively. Ethyl benzene was not detected in any of the samples.
-6-
VOLATILES
TOT AL XYLENES
ALKANES
3 UNIDEN1'IFIED COMPOUNDS
1 ALKYL SUBSTITUTED AROMATIC
Data Qualifiers
J-Estimated value.
Table 2
Analytical Data Summary Table
Potters Pits
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
PP002GW PP002TB
12/08/98 12/08/98
UG/L(
UG/L 3 J V
UG/L so J V
UG/L 30 J V
UG/L 8 J V
· N-Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
U-Material was analyzed for but not detected.
-7-
PP004GW PP007GW PP008GW
12/08/98 12/08/98 12/08/98
V V V
u :! V ... U ..
V V V
V u u
" '':j . :.J: -... ; 1-' <>·• .... • .. t'' ,. f
;· l •.
VOLATILES
BENZENE<
TOT AL XYLENES UG/L
ALKANES UG/L
TRIMETHYLBENZENE UG/L
' 1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND UG/L
Data Qualifiers
J-Estimated value.
N-Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
U-Material was analyzed for but not detected.
Table 2 (cont)
Analytical Data Summary Table
Potters Pits ·
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
PPIOlGW PP104GW
12/08/98 12/08/98
u u
u u
u u
u u
-8-
PP106GW PPll0GW
12/08/98 12/08/98
u 7 J
u 20 J
u 6 JN
u 6 J
PPlllGW
12/08/98
u
,. u .. !
'
u
u
. '
' --~ ---·-t·
VOLATILES
Table 2 (cont)
Analytical Data Summary Table
Potters Pits
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
PP201GW
12/08/98
·. .. · ii r··· ·····•·•·• · .. ?.i·.·•·•·····. ·•······) . }J}i ) ..... //•·· .... ···•· .,,., "" 'I'll.Ill' ,:::.C.' ---·. -::· :_:·:::?.\ UG/Li \/ --· .............. • .• . i. •./. ... • .. I ·:.l:l_::y
ETHYLBENZENt>•···•·
. -. __ _.:
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
ALKANES
METHYLETHYLBENZENE
PROPYLBENZENE
ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
2 ALKYL SUBSTITUTED AROMATICS
ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE
TETRAMETHYLBENZENE
METHYLPROPENYLBENZENE
Data Qualifiers
J-Estimated value.
•. : : i•·.•·••··•···•···\
'
N-Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
U-Material was analyzed for but not detected.
ud,t . ...• ··•· ' .. . . .
•• ) .ur (/
UG/L u
UG/L u
UG/L u
.
UG/L u
UG/L u
UG/L u
UG/L u
UG/L u
UG/L u
UG/L u
UG/L u
-9-
PP202GW PP202GWD PP203GW
12/08/98 12/08/98 12/08/98
I / >~· l>?r u r·> •29 > 'i.) ii ..... > ; ----:: ."·-.:::··:::
I<· •· 1,:··-·•,.-.-.··~ 1••-·.··
,·J1)·•····•·•····•.•···
., .. ,,,,:=: t••·Z·•••••t••·/ •; > ? I r 93 -·--c-< • . ..
u u 11
u u 200
u . H: u 1000 J
u u 10 JN
u '•: ~u .. 20 .JN . -
u u 80 JN
u JJ 200 JN -. ,
u ' u 40 .J • u u 8 JN
' 'iN u " u 10 . -
u u 6 JN
METALS
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
COBALT
IRON
. . . __ . ___ ) . ·.:··•,c•·~; LEAD ./•.·•·... ..... .\
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
POTASSIUM
SODIUM
ZINC
Data Qualifiers
A-Average value.
J-Estimated value.
'
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
·uG1L··
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Table 2 (cont)
Analytical Data Summary Table
Potters Pits
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
PP002GW PP004GW PP007GW
12/08/98 12/08/98 12/08/98
u u 1500
4 J u u
24 29 140
2100 J 29000 J 3400 J
u u 3 J
20000 3000 5400
. ·) l<J:}{:({t/-l•••<·.•·••·.·••i•.•·•···•·•·
··-.·:.-~--I··.; ·•···· :::.;:;.,.,,_:;:_:,:_.:)::·
3 •. . \''_:.:' ID/. , s ./Ti { .••..•..•. · •. ·•·•·<•·
1000 •· 1100 4000
21 30 . 24
u 1400 u
u 7600 56000
u 3 J 16 J
N-Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
U-Material was analyzed for but not detected.
-10-
PP008GW PP101GW
12/08/98 12/08/98
u u
. . . u u
74 35
8600 J 51000 J
u u
1600 ' 4200 i
····••··•·····•:·•···········
•·t;.J/.•·•···••· :?JSi l;u/): ........ ·. ···•>·'>· .-. _:
1800 1800
. ··-· ..
29 ;. -· _46 · ---; .
u 1600
15000 ' 9300 '
15 J u
METALS
ALUMINUM
ARSENIC
BARIUM
CALCIUM
. ··:·:.: . ..':/c:·-=-,:-:c:-=::,., CIIROMilJM/.-••·•··
IRON
. TJ<'A·Tl··· . i J>: >:•:-:, .. •.-•/ _. -._.· -: ---_.c : '\:·:;,/)(:
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
POTASSIUM
SODIUM
ZINC
Data Qualifiers
A-Average value.
J-Estimated value.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L .. , ... , .. •.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
-UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Table 2 (cont)
Analytical Data Summary Table
Potters Pits
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
PP104GW PP106GW PPll0GW
12/08/98 12/08/98 12/08/98
u u 490
u ., u 3 J
32 39 38
18000 J 41000 J 28000 J
I>\· i 1••-i.i i•·> 1-;: '.) '·• ~:i{J ~\ _;·-=··,_··-·-.. -.::-·-'c::.·='· ·-
. / 1 ··• -!'·:'/t'./;'_':. . . . ...
u 3300 3300
I r __ ._ luc l---4\••·•·••>; 1:.::/:/::,;::.: .. }·:·= ~-,---:: ... 1••-C:/··•·•
. ·•·
..... ·.,_, .. ,... •·•··· ..
1300 1500 1300
u 39 37
u 1700 1500
5200 8900 8000
u 2 J 5 J
N-Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
U-Material was analyzed for but not detected.
-11-
PPlllGW PP201GW
' 12/08/98 12/08/98
' .. ---u 680
u u • ..
43 ' 70
39000 J 1900 J
1·•-·;'•·····t;.·•···········
1--•,iY ),. ·:·:,.,:-~-··· '.1s}• .-•::.:_. .-• • c ,.
5500 4700
' .. ./ .. •·•u.II••tI.• -••l·••·'.,<• I· __. . ··'
> ·:I·•·••--: ' ' , ........... i(
. .. --··---.. 1700 2000
44 23
... -1700 u • 9900 29000
5 J 21
METALS
ALUMINUM·
BARIUM
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
POTASSIUM
SODIUM
ZINC
Data Qualifiers
J-Estimated value.
,
N-Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
U-Material was analyzed for but not detected.
Table 2 (cont)
Analytical Data Summary Table
Potters Pits
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
PP202GW
12/08/98
UG/L u
UG/L 41
UG/L 3900 J
UG/L u
UG/L 1500
UG/L 13 J
UG/L 1600
UG/L u
s UG/L u
-12-
PP202GWD PP203GW • .
12/08/98 • 12/08/98
u 690 • ·• ' .
40 ·• 43
4000 J 7400 J
• u J.;· . 6400 · ' ..
1500 2600
12 J 15 J
1600 u .
u 14000
7 J .8 J •
• •
Metals,-
A variety of metals was detected including aluminum, arsenic, barium, calcium, iron,
lead, magnesium, manganese, nickel, potassium: sodium and zinc. The Record of Decision
(3) specifies ground water remediation goals for chromium and lead at concentrations of 50 --· -· . -. . . .
ug/1 and 15 ug/1, respectively.
Chromium was detected in sample 201-GW at a concentration of 15 ug/1, equal to the
ground water remediation goal. Lead was detected in four samples at concentrations below the
remediation goal. Samples 2-GW, 7-GW, 106-GW and 201-GW contained 3J ug/1, 8 ug/1, 4J
ug/1 and 3 ug/1 of lead, respectively.
During the May, 1998 field investigation chromium was not detected in any of the
samples. Lead was detected in two samples at concentrations below the remediation goal.
Sample 7-GW contained 10 ug/1 of lead and sample 201-GWD contained 3J ug/1 of lead.
Field Parameters
The field parameters of pH, conductivity, turbidity and temperature are presented in
Table 3. The pH of all the samples was acidic and ranged from 3.8 SU in well EPA-07 to
6.5 SU in two wells. The-conductivity ranged from 92 urnhos/cm in well MW-202 to 496
urnhos/cm in well EPA-07. The temperature ranged from a low of 19.2 °c to a high of 21.1
0c. The turbidity of all samples was less than 7 NTU ..
-13-
•
Well Sample
Number Number
EPA-02 2-GW
EPA-04 4-GW.
EPA-07 7-GW
MW-201 201-GW
MW-202 202-GW
MW-203 203-GW
EPA-08 8-GW
MW-101 101-GW
MW-104 104-GW
MW-106 106-GW
MW-110 110-GW
MW-111 111-GW
Table 3
Monitor Well Field Parameters
Potter's Pits
Sandy Creek, North Carolina
. .
•
pH (SU) Co~ductivity · Turbidity
fumhos/crn \ INTU)
5.2 146 6.9
6.0 197 0.25
3.8 496 0.8
4.2 231 1.2
4.9 92 3.15
5.0 168.1 0.37
5.7 167 1.33
6.5 320 0.48
6.1 128.3 1.09
6.2 180 0.45
6.5 204 3.0
6.1 264 0.37
--measurement not obtained. Probe malfunctioned. •
-14-
Temperature ,oo
20.1
20.4
--
--
20.5
20.4
19.2
20.9
21.1
20.2
19.8
20.8
• •
REFERENCES
1. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Science and Ecosystem
Support Division, Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and
Quality Assurance Manual, May 1, 1996.
2. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Science and Ecosystem
Support Division, Analytical Support Branch Operations and Quality Control Manual,
December, 1997.
3. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Record of Decision for the
Potter's Septic Tanlc Services Pits Superfund Site, August 5, 1992.
·'
• •
Appendix A
Analytical Data Sheets .
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1309 FY 1999
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Project: 99-0068
ld/Slalion: PP002GW I
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB67
D Number: 0867
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: AT AS
RES UL TS UNITS
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U. UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
BJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
3J UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTALXYLENES
-A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/09/1999 ·14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:10
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may 11ot be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
· Sample 1309 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP002GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
ALKANES
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0B67
D Number: 0B67
RESULTS
50J
30J
BJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
1 ALKYL SUBSTITUTED AROMA TIC
EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumplive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/09/1999' 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requeslor:
Project Leader: □THOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:10
Ending: '
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
R--qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane '}·1
••
•
VOL.A TILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1315 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP004GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0873
D Number: 0872
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
RESULTS UNITS
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U · UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
. 10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (fOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (fRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (fETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
B_eginning: 12/08/1998 12:05
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-inlerferences. J--estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-adual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis iS necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or meta.bolites of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1312 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facilily: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP007GW I
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0870
D Number: 0870
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contraclor: ATAS
RESULTS
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U.
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE ,
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: □THOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:28
Ending:
\-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-eslimaled value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
<-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
~--qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
::--confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported; see chl~rdane constituents 2.constituents or metabolite~ of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1310 FY 1999 Project: 99--0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP008GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number. 26704
MD Number: 0868
D Number: 0868
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
RESULTS
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGiL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (fOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (fRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (fETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
'
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:24
Ending: ..
,-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumplive evidence of presence of material.
:-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the mini"1um quantitalion limil.
t-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. ·resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verifiCBtion. •' · ·. ' · '.
>confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1319 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facilily: Potters Pils
Program: SSF
ld/Slalion:PP101GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0877
D Number: QB76
RESULTS UNITS
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
!\-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader. DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 12:25
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
I I. i
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1318 FY 1999 Project: 99--0068
VOL.A TILES SCAN
Facilily: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP104GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: Q876
D Number. 0875
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
RESULTS UNITS
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE} 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (fOTAL}
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (fRICHLOROETHYLENE}
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (fETRACHLOROETHYLENE} 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
\-average value. NA-not analyzed.• NAl-interfererices. J--estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 12:25
Ending:
<-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known 10 be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. ~-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. ::-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chl?rdane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESO, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1316 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP106MW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0874
D Number: 0873
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS '
RESULTS
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
3J
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE .
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
~-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnlerferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 12:00
Ending:
<-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. ~-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. · :-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV·SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1320 FY 1999 . Project: 99--0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
ld/Stalion:PP110GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Saridy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: Q876
D Number: 0877
RESULTS UNITS
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
11 UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
7J UG/L
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
A-average value. NA-not anatyzed. NAl-interfer8nces. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/06/1996 13:15
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitalion limit. R-qc Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metaboliles of technical chlordane
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample 1320 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP110GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
20J
ANALYTE
ALKANES
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0878
D Number: 0877
6J
6JN
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
~-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-inlerferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 13:15
Ending:
<-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantilation limit. ~-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. >confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•·
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19 '
Sample 1308 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP111GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB66
D Number: QB66
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
RESULTS
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) .
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estirnated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:15
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
. VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1311 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068 ·
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP201 GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB69
D Number. QB69
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
RESULTS UNITS
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN .
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:26
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L:actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the numbei is the minimum quantitalion limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. · i , • , ,,
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1306 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP202GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB64
D Number: QB64
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
RESULTS
10U
1DU
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
1DU
10U
10UJ
10U
1DU
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
1DU
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ·
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Dale: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:00
Ending:
.. '
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitalion limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: t.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1307 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits .
Program: SSF
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: OB65 Id/Station: PP202GWD /
Media: GROUNDWATER D Number: QB65
RES UL TS UNITS
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE}
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
IOU UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
IOU UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL}
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE}
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE}
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J~stimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:00
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1317 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP203GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: OB75
D Number. OB74
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
RESULTS
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
29
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
11
10U
93
10U
200
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
. 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 12:37
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample· 1317 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP203GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0875
D Number: QB74
RESULTS UNITS
1000J UG/L
10JN UG/L
20JN UG/L
80JN UG/L
200JN UG/L
40J UG/L
8JN UG/L
10JN UG/L
6JN UG/L
ANALYTE
ALKANES
METHYLETHYLBENZENE
PROPYLBENZENE
ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE
TRtMETHYLBENZENE
2 ALKYL SUBSTITUTED AROMATICS
ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE
TETRAMETHYLBENZENE
METHYLPROPENYLBENZENE
EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor. A TAS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/09/1999 .14:1,9
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 12:37
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. .; · ~ C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chl?rdane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES .SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 1321 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
VOLATILES SCAN
Facilily: Potters Pils
Program: SSF
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
ld/Slalion: PP002TB /
Media: GROUNDWATER D Number: QB71 Org Contractor: ATAS
RESULTS UNITS
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10UJ UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L ·
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U ·uG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
Production Date: 02/09/1999 14:19
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 11 :18
Ending:
A•average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-inlerferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value is known lo be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample 1309 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP002GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0867
D Number: 0867
RESULTS UNITS
160U UG/L
4UJ UG/L
4J UG/L
24 · UG/L
1U UG/L
1U UG/L
2100J UG/L
1U UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
20000 UG/L
3J UG/L
1000 UG/L
21 UG/L
0.10U UG/L
4U UG/L
830U UG/L
2U UG/L
2U UG/L
9200U UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
3U UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
Production Date: 02/10/1999 13:46
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requester.
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:10
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of.presence of material.
K-actual value is known lo be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is lhe minimum quantitalion limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/199!:i 13:46 ·
Sample 1315 FY 1999 Project: 99--0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
ld/Slalion: PP004GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
30U UG/L ALUMINUM
4UJ UG/L ANTIMONY
2U UG/L ARSENIC
29 UG/L BARIUM
1U UG/L BERYLLIUM
1U UG/L CADMIUM
29000J UG/L CALCIUM
1U UG/L CHROMIUM
4U UG/L COBALT
3U UG/L COPPER
3000 UG/L IRON
2U UG/L LEAD
1100 UG/L MAGNESIUM
30 UG/L MANGANESE
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0873
D Number. 0872
0.10U UG/L TOTAL MERCURY
4U UG/L NICKEL
1400 UG/L POTASSIUM
2U UG/L SELENIUM
2U UG/L SILVER
7600 UG/L SODIUM
4U UG/L THALLIUM
3U UG/L VANADIUM
3J UG/L ZINC
NA UG/L CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 12:05
Ending:
K-actual value is known lo be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantilalion limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification ..
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.conslituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS·, GA Production Date: 02/10/1999 13:46
Sample 1312 FY 1999 Project: • 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP007GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB70
D Number: OB70
RES UL TS UNITS
1500 UG/L
4UJ UG/L
2U UG/L
140 UG/L
1U UG/L
1U UG/L
3400J UG/L
2U UG/L
3J UG/L
3U UG/L
5400 UG/L
8 UG/L
4000 UG/L
24 UG/L
0.10U UG/L
30U UG/L
1300U. UG/L
2U UG/L
2U UG/L
56000 UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
16J UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM .
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE.
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:28
Ending:
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification . .,. ·
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constiluents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/1999 13:46
Sample 1310 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP008GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0868
D Number: 0868
RESULTS UNITS
SOU UG/L
4UJ UG/L
3U UG/l
74 UG/l
1U UG/l
1U UG/l
8600J UG/L
1U UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/l
1600 UG/L
2U UG/L
1800 UG/l
29 UG/L
0.10U UG/l
20U UG/l
1300U UG/L
2U UG/l
2U UG/l
15000 UG/l
4U UG/L
3U UG/l
15J UG/l
NA UG/l
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requester:
Project leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:24
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resamplin·g and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituenls or m~tabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Dale: 02/10/199!113:46 ·
Sample 1319 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP101 GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
30U UG/L ALUMINUM
4UJ UG/L ANTIMONY
3U UG/L ARSENIC
35 UG/L BARIUM
1U UG/L BERYLLIUM
1U UG/L CADMIUM
51000J UG/L CALCIUM
1U UG/L CHROMIUM
4U UG/L COBALT
3U UG/L COPPER
4200 UG/L IRON
3U UG/L LEAD
1800 UG/L MAGNESIUM
46 UG/L MANGANESE
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0877
D Number: OB76
0.10U UG/L TOTAL MERCURY
4U UG/L NICKEL
1600 UG/L POTASSIUM
2U UG/L SELENIUM
2U UG/L SILVER
9300 UG/L SODIUM
4U UG/L THALLIUM
3U UG/L VANADIUM
3U UG/L ZINC
NA UG/L CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 12:25
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-inlerferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-aciual value Is known' to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quanlilatlon limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis ,is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see _chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/1999 13:46 ·
Sample 1318 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP104GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0876
D Number: 0875
RESULTS UNITS
30U UG/L
4UJ UG/L
3U UG/L
32 UG/L
1U UG/L
1U UG/L
18000J UG/L
2U UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
20U UG/L
2U UG/L
1300 UG/L
2U UG/L
0.10U UG/L
4U UG/L
1000U UG/L
2U UG/L
2U UG/L
5200 UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
3U UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
A-average value. NA•not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-eslimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 12:25
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see ~hlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/199913:46 ·
Sample 1316 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP106MW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
30U UG/L ALUMINUM
4UJ UG/L ANTIMONY
2U UG/L ARSENIC
39 UG/L BARIUM
1U UG/L BERYLLIUM
1U UG/L CADMIUM
41000J UG/L CALCIUM
1U UG/L CHROMIUM
4U UG/L COBALT
3U UG/L COPPER
3300 UG/L IRON
4J UG/L LEAD
1500 UG/L MAGNESIUM
39 UG/L MANGANESE
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB7 4
D Number: 0873
0.10U UG/L TOTAL MERCURY
4U UG/L NICKEL
1700 UG/L POTASSIUM
2U UG/L SELENIUM
2U UG/L SILVER
8900 UG/L SODIUM
4U UG/L THALLIUM
3U UG/L VANADIUM
2J UG/L ZINC
NA UG/L CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
A•average value. NA•not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J.-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 12:00
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituentS or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/19&'9 13:46
Sample 1320 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
. Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP110GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB78
D Number: QB77
RESULTS
490
4U
3J
38
1U
1U
28000J
1U
4U
3U
3300
2U
1300
37
0.10U
4U
1500
2U
2U
8000
4U
3U
5J
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value: N-presumplive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 13:15
Ending:·
t I,
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-malerial was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc ifldicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane conslituenls 2.conslituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/19!HI 13:46
Sample 1308 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP111GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sahdy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB66
D Number: QB66
RESULTS
30U
4UJ
2U
43
1U
1U
39000J
1U
4U
3U
5500
2U
1700
44
0.10U
4U
1700
2U
2U
9900
4U
3U
5J
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
lnorg Conlractor: SENTIN
Org Conlractor: A TAS
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:15
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but nol detected. the number ls the minimum quantitalion limit:~
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may ilot be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gans: 1.when no value Is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane . ·'
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/1999 13:46'
Sample 1311 FY 1999 Project: 99--0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pils
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP201GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB69
D Number: QB69
RESULTS UNITS
680 UG/L
4UJ UG/L
2U UG/L
70 UG/L
1U UG/L
1U UG/L
1900J UG/L
15 UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
4700 UG/L
3 UG/L
2000 UG/L
23 UG/L
0.10U UG/L
40U UG/L
1100U UG/L
2U UG/L
2U UG/L
29000 UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
21 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contrnctor: A TAS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requestor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:26
Ending:
K-actual value is known lo be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
-, R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is.reported, see, chlordane constituents 2.conslituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
. '
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample 1306 FY 1999 Project 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP202GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0864
D Number: 0864
RESULTS
90U
4UJ
2U
41
1U
1U
3900J
7U
4U
JU
BOU
2U
1500
13J
0.10U au
1600
2U
2U aaoou
4U
3U
3U
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 02/10/1999._13:46
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:00
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-materia/,was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
•
•
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituent~ 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane · -,.f: • .,
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/1999"13:46
Sample 1307 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP202GWD /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB65
D Number: QB65
RESULTS UNITS
110U UG/L
4UJ UG/L
2U UG/L
40 UG/L
1U UG/L
1U UG/L
4000J UG/L
6U UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
90U UG/L
2U UG/L
1500 UG/L
12J UG/L
0.10U UG/L
9U UG/L
1600 UG/L
2U UG/L
2U UG/L
8800U UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
7J UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. 'J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requestor:
Project-Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 10:00
Ending:
• I
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. l-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not delected. the number is lhe minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. ·
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or meta~olites of technical chlordane
. '
. , .
•
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHl=NS, GA Production Date: 02/10/199!113:46 ·
Sample 1317 FY 1999 Project: 99--0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP203GW /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RES UL TS UNITS ANALYTE
690 UG/L ALUMINUM
4UJ UG/L ANTIMONY
3U UG/L ARSENIC
43 UG/L BARIUM
1U UG/L BERYLLIUM
1U UG/L CADMIUM
7400J UG/L CALCIUM
1U UG/L CHROMIUM
4U UG/L COBALT
3U UG/L COPPER
6400 UG/L IRON
4U UG/L LEAD
2600 UG/L MAGNESIUM
15J UG/L MANGANESE
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number. 26704
MD Number: QB75
D Number: QB74
0.10U UG/L TOTAL MERCURY
4U UG/L NICKEL
1200U UG/L POTASSIUM
2U UG/L SELENIUM
2U UG/L SILVER
14000 UG/L SODIUM
4U UG/L THALLIUM
3U UG/L VANADIUM
BJ UG/L ZINC
NA UG/L CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Org Contractor: A TAS
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 12:37
Ending:.
.. ,
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-8:clucil value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatio_n limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA. REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/1999·13:46 ·
Sample 1313 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP001TB /
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: QB71
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
30U
4UJ
2U
4U
1U
1U
90UJ
1U
4U
3U
20U
3U
20U
2U
0.10U
4U
40U
2U
.2U
130U
4U
3U
3U
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L ·
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor. SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 11 :17
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quanlitation limit
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resamplir.g and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
'. '
•
•
. 'I
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/199:i 13:4£
Sample 1314 FY 1999. Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
F acilily: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: PP003PB /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0872
RESULTS UNITS
30U UG/L
4UJ UG/L
3U UG/L
4U UG/L
1U UG/L
1U UG/L
210UJ UG/L
1U UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
14U UG/L
2U UG/L
20U UG/L
3J UG/L
0.10U UG/L
4U UG/L
20U UG/L
2U UG/L
2U UG/L
130U UG/L
4U UG/L
3U UG/L
3J UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE.
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: SENTIN
Produced by: Guthrie, Diane
Requeslor:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/199811:30
Ending:
I -.t
• i
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. . _ . i ~t :,
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number ls.ihe minimum quantitatioh limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 02/10/199!i 13:46
Sample 1322 FY 1999 Project: 99-0068
METALS SCAN
Facility: Potters Pits
Program: SSF
Id/Station: QA009PES /
Media: WATSPK
Sandy Creek, NC
Case Number: 26704
MD Number: 0863
D Number: QB63
RESULTS
51
4U
25
4U
20
11
120
21
110
3U
15
2U
33
2
3.8
4U
39
2U
2U
130U
4U
JU
630
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY•
. NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
lnorg Contractor: $ENTIN
Org Contractor: ATAS
Produce~ by: Guthrie, Diane
Requester:
Project Leader: DTHOMAN
Beginning: 12/08/1998 09:00
Ending:
V01058,0014726M · '·:
..
'
,.L1-•1
. ! •• ~·
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-inlerferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value is ·known lo be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see ,chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane '
•