NCD981023260_19920713_Potters Septic Tank Service Pits_FRBCERCLA C_DEM correspondence 1983 - 1992-OCR

•
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Groundwater Section
July 13, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: Perry Nelson
THROUGH: Oritina/ ~ened By:
llick. Shiver klCK S/ilVIJI
FROM: Bruce Reed 1/J?l.-
SUBJECT: Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits NPL Site
Review of Draft Record of Decision
Sandy Creek
Brunswick. County
Bruce Reed with the Groundwater Section of the Wilmington Regional Office provided the
comments that are offered below for the subject report. These comments include those from the
Air Quality Section, the Water Quality Section, and the Groundwater Section.
Air Quality Section 011111e11ts
The selected remedy includes air stripping. Volatile organic emissions are estimated to
be less than 30 pounds per day. No emission control is required. Since no air-cleaning device
is proposed, an air permit is not required.
The air stripper must be registered with the Division. Material presented in the Record
of Decision [TABLE 28, TABLE 29, Dil\GRAMS, DisaJSSION, ETC] sufficiently meets registration
requirements for the project.
The Air Quality Section requests permission to copy parts of the Record of Decision and
to be allowed to place this information on file. If this request is granted, the information on file
will be available to the public. In the alternative, the following information must be submitted
to the Division and will be available to the public;
name of company operating source
principal company contact
location of source [ADDRESS]
site diagram which shows streams, roads, homes, buildings
description of process
total air flow -stack height -fuels used
total weight and kind of air pollution released
calculations used to determine daily emissions
acceptance of requirement to notify DEM in event emissions increase (above stated
values)
length of time remediation activities will last
Perry Nelson
July 13, 1992
Pag'e 2
• •
This information should be sent to the Wilmington Regional Office and questions
concerning registration may be directed to John Anderson at [phone].
Water Quality Section Coon:rents
It appears that a NPDES permit will be reqttired. No other comments at this time, other
than those previously expressed in review of previous reports.
Groundwater Section Ounnents
The selected remedial actions for soil and groundwater reclamation appear satsifactory.
However, the cleanup standards for napthalene and benzene in groundwater are not consistent
with 2L standards. Benzene will be treated to a concentration of 5 parts per billion (ppb) , and
napthalene to 30 ppb. We are unsure as to whether the cleanup standards listed above would
satisfy the health-based concerns of the state toxicologists.
Also, further assessment of groundwater contamination (benzene at 58 ug/1) found in
a deeper well is mentioned on page 106. We suggest that additional monitoring wells be installed
----to assess the extent of this contamination, and that cleanup of this area is made.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Bruce Reed at [phone].
RSS/BAR
cc: WiRO-AQS
WiRO-WQS
WiRO-GWS
AIR \BRUCE-5 .ASC 7-10-92
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENfAL MANAGEMENf
Air Q.ia]ity Section
May 31, 1994
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Subject:
Bruce Parris GWS
Request fur Comment on the ANAL PERFORMANCE BASED DffiIGN Document (REPORT)
For the Source and Groundwater Remediafun at the Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits Superfund Site
BECHTEL ENVIRONMENTAL INC March, 1994
This is a perfurrnance-ba5ed deiign document fur source and growxlwater remediation at the Potter's Septic Tanlc Service Pits
Superfuoo Site in southeastern North Carolina. The work ioclude, excavation of contaminated soil from the deiignated area of
the site, treating the contaminalfd soil using low temperature thermal desorption, stabiliz.ation/solidification of thermally treated soils
Of necessary), extra:tion of contaminated growxlwater from shallow and deep aquifurs, and treatment and disposal of extracted
growxlwater (page 1 of REPORI).
3.9.4 Air Stripping
After the treatment process fur metals is completed, the growxlwater will be pwnped to the top of an air stripping tower. While
the water ra;rale, down through a large tube, a high-pow em! fun blows the contaminants from the water. The fun then sends
the contaminated air out of the top of the tower. The volatilized contaminants are treated through a carbon adsorption system before
the air is relea5ed into the atmosphere. Table 3-10 give, results of previous tests conductfd using air stripping to remove VOCs
and SVOCs (p<lge 48 qf REPOR1).
Since the volatilized contaminants are treated through a carbon adsorption system before the air is relea5ed into the atmosphere,
an AIR PERMIT IS REQUIRED. Carbon adsorption systems are air-mntrol devices which must be permitted in accordance with
NCGS § 143-215.108., "Control of' sowus of air pollufun; permits required.".
It is important to note that this statutory requirement is incorporated by North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 1 SA, Subchapter
2Q. 15A NCAC 2Q .010l(a)(3) reads, in part, that no owner oroperator shall .. (v.itluJutfirst applying for and obtaining an air
quality permit) .. 'Enter into an irrevocable contract fur the construction, operation or modification of an air-cleaning device'.
Section 4.0 WORK PlAN, 4.1 PROJECT SCHEDULE and 4.2.11 RfguiatOly Compiiance Plan indicate a schedule fur
procurement of equipment and subcontracts fur services (page 51 of REPORI) and state that "the contractor shall be responsible fur
obtaining all necessary permits, approvals, license,, and consents related to excavation, construction, and operation and
maintenance of the treatment systems." (page 55 of REPORI). This seems to provide at least the opportuniiy fur the contractor to
obtain an AIR PERMIT prior to entering into an irrevocable contract fur the construction, operation or modification of an air-
cleaning device.
•
Bruce Paris
5/31/94 pg 2
Please contact the AIR PERMITS BRANCH in Raleigh if there are questions concerning the need to obtain an air permit for this
project (919 733-3340) or write to the Pennits Branch at the following address-
Ms. Laura S. Butler, P.E.
Assistant Chief
Air ()Jality Pennitting
N. C. Division of Environmental Management
P. 0. 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Air Permit Applications are available through the regional office or the AIR PERMITS BRANCH. If there are questions
concerning this memorandwn, please direct them to Mr. John Anderson, DEM-WIRO, at [phone].
The WIRO has copioo pages I, 48, 50, 51 and 55 of the REPORT. This information will be kept on file and will be available
to the public.
cc: WIRO
AfR"2
" '
,. I
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGFMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
MAY 25, 1994
MEMORANDUM
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Arthur Mouberry
Rick Shiver, P.G.
Charles Stehman, Ph.D., P.G. Qv
Review of the March, 1994 FINAL PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN
for Source and Groundwater Remediation at the Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits
Superfund Site.
Brunswick County
Bruce Parris with the Groundwater Section of the Wilmington Regional Office provided
the comments that are offered below for your consideration. The review involves a report of
the final perfom1ance based design for remediation of soil and groundwater contamination at the
subject site. A summary of comments from the Air Quality Section and the Water Quality
Section is also included in this memo.
The site was fonnerly used as a disposal site for waste petroleum products and septic tank
sludge. Past practices included placing the wastes directly on the land surface or in shallow
unlined pits. After waste disposal practices ceased at the subject site, ownership of the property
changed hands and the property was developed for residential sites. After some of the lots were
sold and occupied, buried wastes were discovered in one of the resident's yard. DEM personnel
collected soil samples from the yard and groundwater samples from the resident's well.
Laboratory analyses revealed contamination in excess of State Action levels in both soils and
groundwater. Due to the nature of contamination found at the site, the EPA Region IV
Superfund Section subsequently took primary regulatory responsibility for the site. Superfund
studies were perfonned at the site to further define the extent and type of contaminants. The
project has now moved into the remediation/treatment feasibility study phase.
Air Quality Section Comments:
Mr. John Anderson of the Air Quality Section in the Wilmington Regional Office
reviewed the subject report and offered the following comments.
. '
Mr. Arthur Mouberry
May 25, 1994
Page Two
Section 3.9.4 "Air Stripping", states that after the treatment process for metals is
completed, the groundwater will be pumped to the top of an air stripping tower. While the
water cascades down through a large tube, a high-powered fan blows the contaminants from the
water. The fan then sends the contaminated air out of the top of the tower. The volatilized
contaminants are treated through a carbon adsorption system before the air is released into the
atmosphere. Table 3-10 gives results of previous tests conducted using air stripping to remove
voes and SVOCs (page 48 of REPORT).
Since the volatilized contaminants are treated through a carbon adsorption system before
the air is released into the atmosphere, an AIR PERMIT IS REQUIRED. Carbon adsorption
systems are air-control devices which must be permitted in accordance with NCGS § 143-
215 .108., "Control of sources of air pollutionj permits required.11•
It is important to note that this statutory requirement is incorporated by North Carolina
Administrative Code, Title !SA, Subchapter 2Q. !SA NCAC 2Q .0IOl(a)(3) reads, in part, that
no owner or operator shall .. (without first applying for and obtaining an air quality permil) .. Enter
into an irrevocable contract for the construction, operation or modification of an air-cleaning
device'.
Section 4.0 WORK PLAN, 4.1 PROJECT SCHEDULE and 4.2.11 Regulatory
Compliance Plan indicate a schedule for procurement of equipment and subcontracts for
services (page 51 of REPORT! and state that "the contractor shall be responsible for obtaining all
necessary permits, approvals, licenses, and consents related to excavation, construction, and
operation and maintenance of the treatment systems." (page 55 of REPORT). This seems to provide
at least the opportunity for the contractor to obtain an AIR PERMIT prior to entering into an
irrevocable contract for the construction, operation or modification of an air-cleaning device.
Please contact the AIR PERMITS BRANCH in Raleigh if there are questions concerning
the need to obtain an air pennit for this project (919 733-3340) or write to the Pennits Branch at
the following address-
Ms. Laura S. Butler, P.E.
Assistant Chief
Air Quality Permitting
N. C. Division of Environmental Management
P. 0. 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Mr. Arthur Mouberry
May 25, 1994
Page Three
Air Penni! Applications are available through the regional office or the AIR PERMITS
BRANCH. If there are questions concerning this memorandum, please direct them to Mr. John
Anderson, DEM-WIRO, at [phone].
The WIRO has copied pages I, 48, SO, 51 and 55 of the REPORT. This information will be
kept on file and will be available to the public.
Water Quality Section Comments:
No comments were received from the Water Quality Section m the Wilmington Regional
Office.
Groundwater Section Comments:
The Groundwater Section agrees that additional data should be collected pertaining to lower
aquifer characteristics so that effective remedial design can include the lower aquifer.
The goals for soil and groundwater remediation were stated in the subject report. It was noted
that the remediation goals for some of the groundwater constituents were in excess of ISA NCAC 2L
standards. Specifically, the remediation goals for benzene and naphthalene were listed as 5.0 ppb and
30.0 ppb respectively. The ISA NCAC 2L standard for benzene is currently 1.0 ppb and the interim
standard for naphthalene has been set at 21.0 ppb. Remediation goals for groundwater contaminants
at the site should be no greater ISA NCAC 2L standards allow.
In summary, groundwater should have contamination concentrations remediated to State
acceptable levels where those levels are more stringent than contaminant action levels required by the
Federal government.
cc: WiRO/GWS
WiRO/AQS
WiRO/WQS
.,
J
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 11, 1994
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jerome Rhodes, Chief
Hazardous Waste Section
~
MAY 2 0 1994
----------------
FROM: -:fa,, A. Preston Howard, Jr.,
SUBJECT: Potter's Septic Tank Service Pits
Brunswick County
Coll or
F,'i,,J fer+,,{tl:£-&se.J
/)e,y/1 ,'n 5;/ore r~,,,'1
DEM Project #94-05
The Division of Environmental Management has completed the
review of the subject document and offers the following comments
and recommendations.
Air Quality Section Comments:
No emissions control is necessary for the treatment system's
air stripper, unless emissions are expected to exceed the
exemption level. If emissions from the treatment system are
expected to exceed the exemption level, then a computer
model would be necessary to calculate the amount of
emissions.
If the emissions from the air stripper are treated with a
carbon adsorption system, then a permit would automatically
be required under NCGS 143-215.108.
Water Quality.Section Comments:
The subject report did not address wetlands protection
measures and/or whether a COE 404 Permit would be required.
The subject report also appeared to conclude that an NPDES
Permit could be issued for the treatment system. An NPDES
permit would only be an option if other nondischarge
alternatives were unavailable. If an NPDES Permit is
requested, plans and specifications for the wastewater
treatment system must p~ submitted to the State for review
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ l 0% post-consumer paper
/}/:.~
i: • . .•
along with the application. In addition to requirements for
the NPDES Permit, if the site requires a Sedimentation and
Erosion Control Plan or a CAMA Major Permit, then the water
Quality Section would require a Stormwater Certification.
Draft Feasibility Study, Part 6.2.4, does not indicate that
surface waters on and adjacent to the site have been
impacted. This is inconsistent with reports of metals
concentration in surface waters near the site which are
currently being investigated by the Regional o'ffice Staff.
Groundwater Section Comments:
Additional data should be collected pertaining to lower
aquifer characteristics so that effective remedial design
can include the lower aquifer.
The goals for soil and groundwater remediation were stated
in the subject report. It was noted that the remediation
goals for some of the groundwater constituents were in·
excess of 1 SA NCAC 2L standards. Specifically, the
remediation goals for benzene and naphthalene were listed as
5.0 ppb and 30.0 ppb respectively. The 15A NCAC 2L standard
for benzene is currently 1 .0 ppb and the interim standard
for naphthalene has been set at 21 .0 ppb. Remediation goals
for groundwater contaminants at the site should be no greater
15A NCAC 2L standards allow.
The subject report listed soil cleanup goals for the site
in terms of individual constituents. North Carolina soil
remediation standards are listed in terms of total petroleum
hydrocarbons. The action levels for TPH gasoline, diesel,
and waste oil are 10 ppm, 40 ppm, and 250 ppm respectively.
Confirmatory soil samples should be laboratory analyzed for
the constituent concentrations listed in the subject report
as well as the appropriate TPH concentrations. Testing for.
TPH will determine whether soils have been remediated to
North Carolina standards.
In summary, both soils and groundwater should have
contamination remediated to State acceptable levels where
those levels are more stringent than contaminant action
levels required by the federal government.
If there are any questions, please advise.
APHjr/sbp/POTTERS.SWM
cc: Alan Klimek
Steve Tedder
Wilmington Regional Office
Central Files
Groundwater Section Files
• • Ii •
.... ...
S-tate of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James C. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Mr. Bob Walker
Claim Consultant
Aetna
Commercial Insurance Division
201 South College Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28232
January 19, 1990
Subject: Response to Your Letter
Dated December 27, 1989
Bob Jamieson
Regional Manager
Gurkin's Incident aka Potter's Pits
Sandy Creek Acres
Brunswick County
Dear Mr. Walker:
This is to inform you that Mr. Parke.r may visit us any time during normal
business hours (8:00 a.m. -5:00 p.m.), Monday through Friday, to examine and
photocopy anything of interest in the file we call the Gurkin' s Incident, aka
Potter's Pits.
We do ask that you reimburse us ten (10) cents per copy.
To assure that someone will be available to direct Mr. Parker to the correct
file, we suggest that he makes an appointment through me to visit with us.
RSS/lfc/
cc: faRO-GWS
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver, P.G.
Environmental Regional Supervisor
7225 Wrlght,ville Avenue, Wilmington, N.C. 28403-3696 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opporrunlty Afftnmartve Action Employer
Eirul
L-487-8
• Commercial Insurance Division
201 South College Street
P.O. Box 32473
Charlotte, North Carolina 28232
[phone]
December 27, 1989
Mr. Rick Shiver
•
/ELEASE FIL~
Vl I 0-\L l ri s ::, \ '°'L
D t-;;,..u n c..o.
N.C. Natural Resources & Community Development
Department of Environmental Health & Natural Resources
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
W!.-i~:htsui 1 Jo Yeaef\ NC 28480
w,/M/N(J/,,,./ '
Re: Pdlicyholder: First Wach~via Corp.
Site: Potter's Septic Tank Site, Bruns;ick County
Dear Mr. Shiver:
It is my understanding that Haywood Parker of our Wilmington Claim
Office recently spoke wtth you regarding the above-mentioned site. Mr.
Parker contacted you as part of our effort to investigate a claim
relating. to clean up of this site.
We are the Liability Insurance carrier for First Wachovia Corporation
of Winston-Salem, North Carolina. First Wachovia purchased the land in
question as part of a foreclosure sale in 1981, and the Environmental
Protection Agency has notified First Wachovia of the fact that First
Wachovia is a Potential Responsible Party because First Wachovia did
acquire the property in 1981 and owned it for several months. It is
our understanding that your department was involved relative to this
site before the Environmental Protection Agency became involved. As
part of our investigation, we are requesting from you permission for a
representative of our Wilmington Office to go to your office for the
purpose of reviewing files developed by your department during the
course of your involvement a_t this site. It is my understanding that
you will make your files available to us under the existing Freedom of
Information Laws of North Carolina. We would like to look at your
files for the purpose of ·determining wheth~r or not there are documents
contained therein which would assist us in our effort to determine what
has taken place at this site over the years, and the source of contami-
nation, etc. We would also like the opportunity to obtain copies of
documents which we identify during the course of our review of your
files which may be pertinent to our investigation.
The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company
One of the /ETNA LIFE & CASUALTY companies
RECEIVED
JAN 9 1990
Wllmln,ton Regional Office
~~· .
-2-
R. Shiver
December 27, 1989
•
Incidentally, I have personally gone to your offices in Mooresville,
Winston-Salem, and Raleigh at various times in order to obtain infor-
mation regarding other sites. I am providing Haywood Parker with a
copy of this letter and request that he contact you as soon as
possible. Thank you.
~"'(;~
Bob Walker
Claim Consultant
BW/ne
I
North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Division of Health Services
P.O. Box 2091 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2091
James G. Martin, Governor
David T. Flaherty, Secretary
Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H.
State Health Director
December 27, 1988
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Lee Crosby, !lead
Superfund/Ina~t,e Sites Branch
Doug llolyfiel~~upervisor
llazardous Waste Compliance Program
Referral of Information: Potter's Pits, Wilmington Oil Terminals
I have attached recent correspondence from the following sites for your review:
Potter's Pit~-Results from m·onitoring wells at the site.
DEM-Wilmington is coordinating the sampling program~
Wilmington area oil terminals-As noted in the letter from Bill Pate,
Mr. Donald Artl1ur has requested assistance on numerous occasions to
evaluate the disposal of leaded tank bottoms on-site at several
tank farm areas. \Je are continuing to evaluate known RCRA activites
at these locations, however, we cannot evaluat·e old, disposal
activities.
In conclusion, please contact me or Flint Worrell regarding these sites if you
should have any questions or comments.
Attachments:
cc: Flint Worrell
Rosemarie Sidorowicz ✓
. ,
CHARLOTTE OFFICE
3500 ONE F'IRST UNION CENTER
PETREE STOCKTON & ROBINSON
. ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1001 WEST FOURTH STREET
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 27101
TELEPHONE [phone]
TELECOPIER [phone] IOAY)
TELECOPIER C919) 725·9378 (NIGHT)
•
RALEIGH OFFICE
301 SOUTH COLLEGE STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28202-6001
TE:LE:PHONE <7041 372-9110
TELECOPIER 1704> 372-0458
SUITE 450, CAROLINA PLACE
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27608
TELEPI-IONE <919) 782-5092
T~LECOPIER 1919) 781•3656
Mr. Rick Shiver
Groundwater Section
December 22, 1988
Division of Environmental Management
N.C. Department of Natural Resources
& Community Development
Wilmington Regional Office
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Re: Gurkin/Potters Septic Pits Site
Dear Rick:
GROUNDW/11 rn SECTION
Wll.MINGlON REGIOML OFFICE
I very much enj eyed meeting you the other day. I
appreciate your cooperation in obtaining copies of your file
concerning the above-referenced matter and have enclosed a check
for $15.30 to cover copying costs.
Once again thanks for your help and I trust that you and
your family will have an enjoyable holiday season.
ery truly yours,
't~i~
JSS:lgb
Enclosure
,::-3~•Jt,:.;,_,.-1,-r.' .. r•·::,· ... , .1.,,.,-,
.... ,-, · ', :J<; ~ 1\-.' 1-1:,,1 •: •
•
I I I
i J. STEPHEN SHI
ATTORNEY AT LAW
PETREE STOCKTON & ROBINSON
1001 WEST FOURTH STREET
WINSTON-SALEM, N. C. 27101
G-W
TELEPHONE
919-725-2351
..
OFFICE
[phone]
II
RES\Off.\
(919) 791-\._)
REBECCA W. BLACKMORE
ATTOA_"4EY AT LAW
LAW FIRM OF
JAMES L. NELSON
I
P.O. BOX 1767
124 MARKET ST.
WILMINGTON N.C. 28402
f r:i...-c oc;:.ccA
, 0 0-.. .\l--C '-.I \ \1
l "5
, t:>ATA_
.---., -------
1-
A c__c_ 'C.-<; <; \ '> G---1\-\'L.
D l \.-\.-V ,,.,_ \-. .. . t l-\.-C r, )
(_ t-,._ ~ P l~lhc__-s, '\:.. h 1 \ I~ C-G..J l L C3 U \~ ___.,-.__ c__ LA-"-Q ) ,
'5 \--FC c____ 0 12 l "'C. D .:-t---l"L__ CO --'7. I? t_ L l'C_
r-ll--L ( \ 7 0 car:> LC~ )
' t
j
I
I
,1
I
I
' I
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Wilmington Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Mr. Earl Gurkin
Route 1, Box 191B
Leland, NC 28451
. Dear Mr. Gurkin:
November 30, 1988
Subject: Transmittal of Analytical Data
Potter's Pits Site
Maco
Brwiswick County
Bob Jamieson
Enclosed are the results of the sampling of the subject wells. If you have questions, please call me at the number below.
RSSjRAS/pj
Enclosure
cc: WiRO -GWS /
Sincerely,
~~s~
Rosemarie A. · Sidorowicz
Hydrogeological Technician II
An Equal Opportunity ,-\f/irmati\'r A.ction Employt:r
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Wilmington Regional Office
James C. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Hr. Lonnie Gore
437 Clearbrook Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
October 20, 1988
Bob Jamieson
Subject: Transmittal of Analytical Data
EPA Monitoring Hells 7 and 8
Gore Property
Maco
Brunswick County
Dear Mr. Gore:
Enclosed are the results of the sampling of the subject wells. The
data indicates that the total dissolved solids standard for ground-
water at this site has been exceeded. Also, the presence of phenols
suggests that the groundwater at this site has been contaminated and
this office would like to continue the use of the monitoring wells
on your property.
If you have questions, please call me at the number below.
RSS/RAS/pj
Enclosure
Sincerely,
' <~ s,'·c4~
Rosemarie A. Sidorowicz
Hydrogeological Technician II
cc: WiRO -Groundwater./
7225 Wriglmville Avenue, Wilmington. NC 28403-3696 • Telephone 919<25&4161
An Equal Opponuniry Affirmative Action Employer
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Wilmington Regional Office
James C. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Mr. Shane Hitchcock
Emergency Response
U.S. EPA -Region IV
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
October 19, 1988
Bob Jamieson
Subject: Transmittal of Analytical Data
Potter's Pits Site
Maco
Brunswick County
Dear Mr. Hitchcock:
Enclosed are the results of the sampli_ng of the subject wells. This
office plans to continue the monitoring program at this site. Please
be aware that monitoring well EPA 6 had to be abandoned because it
was.damaged. Also, the locks·have been changed on the wells, and if
you wish to access them please contact me.
If you have questions, call me at the number below.
RSS/RAS/pj
Enclosure
cc: Bill Jeter .
WiRO -Groundwater ✓.
Sincerely,
Rosemarie A. Sidorowicz
Hydrogeological Technician II
7:J:25 Wrightsville Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403·3696 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Wilmington Regional Office
James C. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Mr. Earl Gurkin
Route 1, Box 191B
Leland, NC 28451
October 17, 1988
Bob Jamieson
Subject: Transmili:al of Analytical Data
Grainger/Gurkin Supply Well
Grainger Property
Maco
Brunswick County
Dear Mr. Gurkin:
Enclosed are the results of the sampling of the subject well. If you have
questions, please call me at the number below.
RSS/RAS/pj
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Rosemarie A . Sidorowicz
Hydrogealogical Technician TI
WiRO -Groundwaterv'
7225 \Xlrighcwi!!c Avenue, \X'ilmin)'..<ton, NC 2fH03,3696 • -lelerhonc 919-256...\161
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
•
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Wilmington Regional Office
James C. Martin, Governor
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Mr. Ernest Grainger
Route 1, Box 191A
Le1and, NC 28451
October 17, 1988
Bob Jamieson
Subject: Transmittal of Analytical Data
Grainger/Gurkin Supply Well
Grainger·Prope:rty
Maco
Brunswick County
Dear Mr. Grainger:
Enclosed are the results of the sampling of the subject well. If you have
questions, please call me at the number below.
RSS/RAS/pj
Enclosure
Sincerely,
F'u~s-~
Rosemarie A. Sidorowicz
Hydrogeological Technician II
cc: WiRO -Groundwater /
7225 \)?riglitsville Avenue, Wilmington, N.C. J.8403-3696 • lClephone 919-256-4161
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
t
N.C. L.,PARTMENT.OF NATURAL RESOUR,"", LAB NUMBER 8 27G& ::z . COUNTY
OUA)YfiO.Cl-33 CJ-
L</0 JJ/}65
SERI AL NO.
LONG.
ARO, WaRo,®
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~ REcv1vE~m Trme X'>M""
DEM d by:rrmW;om B~
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM '----------=-...,.,c-
ENTRY BY: ¼ CK:[J)(r()
Reoori !O: ARO, FAQ; MAO,
V✓SRO, Kinston FO Other
ther 00
SAMPLE
ROUTINE
PRIORITY DATA
RE PORTED: ____ ?,__-_,_l_qLDfi_-_,,··~--D EMERGENCY DATE ::ihipped by.
COLLECTOR[S): s,J. 1ca:,ATE TIME '2:% /!\PURPOSE: BASELINE, ~ COM PL I AN CE . ~ one)
LUS,. OTHER
FIELD ANALYSES Owner
Pll40Q 2:, 3 Spec. Cond.94 w at 25°C Location or site
Te mp. 1 0 fl ° C Odor _,l\~t!'\~e.,=----
Apoea r a nc e C/e.a,r-Taste f-: --
Field Analysis By: M'c."'D,,,...J.J/S~w;..:.z I
Sampling
Remarks
ugll LABORATORY ANALYSES
600~310 m,;i/1 X OJu. Sollds 70300-:;;r)/) ~J mg/I
COO HiQh 340 mg/t Fluorlde 951 mo/I
COO LO"' 335 mg/I Hardnes.s:Total 900 mg/I
Coliform:MF Fecal 3 1616 1100ml [\ 'J Hardness (non-c ■rb] 902 mg/I
Colilorm:MF Total 3t50◄ 1100ml ) " ')( Phenols 32730 .c:'~. LfJ ug/1
X TOC 680 LF,-mg/J I Spacltlc Cond. 95 uMhos/cm7
Turbidity 76 NTU Sulfate 9-45 mg/I
suH1de HS mg/I
y pH -403 7 ;:;, l't'3)[ uni ts
All<allnt1y IODH•.5 ◄10 mg/I
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 • 15 mg/I
C1rbon11e 445 mo/I
Bicaruon.;ite 440 mo/I )t, NH3 as N 610 ,/J'f • . mg/I >< Arssnic:Total 1002 I ,r, ug/1 ) TKN as N 625 A ;:i :,r mo/I
Cerbon dioxide 405 mg/I )c N02 .. N03 UN 630./l~ )< . mg/I >< Chloride 940 ., llJ mg/I \I P:To!al as P 665 ~ / /.,.. 1 lf:!:L.. mg/I
Chromlum:Hel 1032 ug/1
Color:Tnie 80 Pt-Co
Cyanide 720 ( mg/I -' '/. 977.// H I'? h -v.J-t)' (? Lab Comments: A,// "V./ .J . , r (..,'
-11
AO -Sliver 1077 uo/1
Al • Aluminum 1105 ug/J
V Bl • Barium ·1007 ( 9-() ug/1
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/I I x' { .::i ,() Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/J
X Chromlum:To11I 103<1 { ;)<; ug/1
'x Cu -Copper 10-42 <'. \A ug/1
',,! Fe • Iron 10-45 '1 ' ;i,v) ug/1
Hg· Mercury 71900 ug/J
K • Potassium 937 mg/I
Mg -Magneslun:i 927 . mg.JI
>< Mn -Ma·nganaie 10S5 55 ug/1
Na • Sodium 929 mg/I
NI • Nickel 1067 uo/1
V Pb • Lead 1051 I, n ug/1
Se • Selenium 1 14 7 uo/1
sK: Zn -Zinc 1092 ., " ·-· • V I
" ' . '1UL 6 :::J jq,;Q
r .. r_ A A•v _/ :;rm, . oyc3,. // ,-.,~•_.brl J.
GW-5~ Revised 7/85 For Dissolved Analysis -submit flltered samole and write ·01s· in block While copy -Headquarters Pink cbpy -Region Yellow copy -Lab
.
' ~9.!WP~~~~ J,l_I_;l;i~~l r\ \ IS' r :-.;~~ •mi 1e· , ·-, ] I U .'P~~ cohor s •s~~•,•
II'\': ~)VJI
Acid H.,'! r1~ i Ci d.,_,..:!r lORQ --~ ---.
Bau t Neutral Eltract■~!!_Organica
~i'lC4f.l,pl~~~~,.r-:;;:::--,_~
I I I • 1~Y{ 1Ut,f.)"j{µ.• ~l',J '\'!--A I :-; ; \ ., , \_,-.. , •. -. ., \ t /1 (. I I'• l ,
X 1ela'Mj 'oP~•·;:;"i"c, (VoA.,'ba111_iJ_ ) ~ l
'"! \i '
~Dib ror,t)l 1h '5!.e Ice~~.nr
"""'1' ,\\f,Fl'D ,:::r'Ti()N • 1:>t.t. AT iCHE [}, 1Rr.ANICS
AN 'YSIS 'R 'PORT
.
-A,"' . -/),£},.,, -A _y j .A ~ ~ N.
/ . -1
COUIJTY 'Ei.---u..1::1 cw/cf< ---~ OJ,MD t-io.CC.-:,3 CJ-SERIAL NO.
LAT. s4-/IQ.S-LONG ]SO<j (/
N.C. cPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOUR'-.,
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
LAB NUMBER 8
Rec'd by:
Report to: ARO, FRO, MAO. ARO, WaRO, 0
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
SAMPLE PRIORITY ATA
Other -------------=---
ENTRY BY·~ . CK:f[);rn WSRO, Kinston FO 0 the r ________ _
ROUTINE
N~-'-.... .+<, A-1 8005 3 1() moll V Diss. Sollds 70300 ",,(!:)('\moJI
COD HiQh 340 mo/I Fluoride 951 mo/I
COD Low 335 mon H1rdness:Tol_11 900 ·mo/I
Colilorm:MF Fecal 3 1616 1100ml Hardness crlon·c,1rt/J. 902 mg/I
Colilorm:MF Total 31504 1100ml IX Phenols 32730~ /() ug/1 X TOC 680 :JI. moll SoecHfc• Cond. 951 uMhos/cm2 -· ---.. Turbidity 76 tHU SuHa!e 945 mg/!
Sulfldl J.45 mg/I
X ;'.IH ~03 ~.I-~units
A/~al,nity to DH ~.5 4 10 mg/I
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 "5 mg/J
Carbonate 44.5 mo/I
Bicart,onale 440 mo/I X NH3 15 N 6 10 ' ;: mg/I x Arsenic:Total ,002 ( \i\ """ V TKN as N 625 /, ,
mg/J
Carbon dioxide 405 mo/I V N02 -t N03 as N 630 ,()' mon '>< Chloride 940 q.,< mg/I X P:Total as P 665 , :J-mg/I
Chromium:Hel 1032 U0/1
Color:True 80 Pl-Co
Cyanide 720 ,,,. mg/I -
lab Comments: --%_ r H t::. !U O l--j r-R~ e--5-11)
D EMERGENCY DATE REPORTED: 7~/q.,..<j~
. 0
X
.)<
"' I><
)<
IX
IX
><
! ) /
E:iYMPLAlw.) COMPLI ANGE, (circle one)
LUST, OTHER
•~J u~ v .. ,,., { ow ¼!,I I c;, ,e
Ao • Sliver 1077 uo/1 Oroanochlorln, Peslfcld••
Al • Aluminum 1105 uo/1 ~!!--"-~1--;-.. .. fi1'#" ••.11r:-1 i\ Or~•.J1p!3, ~!~hJH_U~~l,sJlfl.5':• i"\
81 • Barium ·1001 ( "vV, """ I 11 I J !::» '-' , ...... , V llC. 1111 c, -Calcium 918 mg/I Aci,b(8:~icldes .... JI/ JI
Cd • Cadmium 1027 < ;:),l'l ug/1 1111 ... , 1000
·chromium:Total 1 OJ4 :,,:;N', ug/1 BUI --------/ Neu1r1I Extr,c11bl1 Organic•
U'7 Cu • Cooper 1 04 2 ug/1 Acid Extr ■cnble Organics -. -.. Fe • Jron 1045 /al• MY> ug/1 un.vu-nunf-\lL:.:\ V'C.VIIVII --. -.... ---·--Ho· Mercury 71900 ug/1 l"Y Pur~•Jt,~l'o,.'1,;i'-a'"h, c~'.A1"'tl1hu~j • ,_
K • Potassium 937 mg/I
Mg • Magnesium 927 m<>1I 1,2 • Oibromoe!hane (EOB)
Mn • Manganese 1055 l.ll uo/J
Na • Sodium 929 mg/I SEE ATTACHED UKuAN11,;:.
N; • Nie k el 1087 ug/1 ANALYSIS ttEPORI
Pb • Lead 1 05 1 ;)cl ug/1
s, • Selenium 1 1 '-7 . ug/1 .... ~···· ~-e -.. Zn -Zinc , o"K.,. • .n-J V b.<1a. l [J·')·;'.] ~:.: ·[ t·:: >·' ·.• \ ,·. .• ; !'·· ,. .. '·" i,.:,:, rr·:~ '-~~""-~--~-: : T
JUL 6:) l!:H5ti i:l) , ..
t-.:iL::1 II J I () "! l I"' r"I, } I --Y flW"~ J!!j."{)'7 !~E-· --~ ·---Vv'
•
. I
. , r,j ,_·,-. ·-:· :1 Gflo lJ,,.n\,,1,11 "·· . , .,Li ,J l.11
·, :-;·. ·,·' ~::1...-1 ,GI·-!
i\J(.: GW-54 Revised 7/85 For Dissolved Analysis -submit filtered sample and write ·01s· in block While copy -Headquarters Pink copy· Region Yellow copy -Lab
COUNTY b[V"'\su,i,c.~
OUAD NO((.-:,~ Q-SERI AL NO.
34 1 }o 5 Lo NG. _L9:_.,_g o"'-9,.,1,_1 _
N.C.
Report to: ARO, FRO, MRO, ARO, WaR~.-
, ... 'PARTMENt OF NATURAL REsou/-..) LAB NUMBER s <Z_G 51/ ··
& COMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT @iiE REcf(Jto¢QJiffnme )S~a') .;
.DEM · 'd by: .U/ From: Bu~
GROUNDWA,TER FIELD/LAB FORM er---~------~~~~
.,,I SAMPLE PRIO.RITY .. . . DATA ENTRY BY·~ ,/· .. K/•q £),r{\._;;,.
WSRO, Kinston FO
Shipped by: Bus,
JCs. ROUTINE D EMERGENCY DATE REPORTED•-----'-'--"-~-"-'---'"--'"--
DATE 5-/9-gg TIME /2 ·, j.5
FIELD ANALYSES
0!1 400 b;~ Spec. Cond.g4 I lf~ at 2s0c Temo.10 f'jl; 0 c Odor ~€.,
Appearance c.louly. Taste-,-----
Field Analysis By: frtc~(c/
LABORATORY ANALYSES
8005310 mg/I I'll
COO High 3 ◄0 mo/I
COD Low 335 mg/I
Colirorm:MF reca.1 31616 1100ml
CoJitorm:MF Total 3150A 1100ml .:, X
Owner
Loe a ti on or
Remarks
. t<X.ll r
Diss. Solids 70300-~/~fl #1-mg/I
Fluorlde 951 mg/I
Hardness:Tot11I 900 mg/I
Hardness (non-carb) 902 . mg/I
Phenols 32730 h ug/1
PURPOSE• BASELINE,
Ag • Sliver 1077 ug/1
Al • Aluminum 1105 ug/1
.,._ Bl • Barium ·1001 ( '.)M , """ Ca• Calcium 916 mg/I
I, Cd -Cadmium 1027 --~A ug/1
V TOC 680 {;,Cf mg/I I Spaclflc Cond. 95 uMho1/cm2 "' ChromilJm:Tolll 103A £ ug/1
Turbldi1y 76 NTU Sullate 9A5 mg/I V Cu -Copper 10A2 l}~ .-· ug/1
mg/I ,,[ \OA5J,r,,.,,,...,... ..
Sulllda 7-tS Fe · Iron ug/1
Hg · Mercury 7 1900 ug/1
x' DH -t03 7..V uni ts K • ·Po11nlum 937 ""mg/I
Alkalinity to pH •.5 -tlO mg/I Mo -Magnesium 927 moJI
Alkalinity 10 pH S.3 "' m,;i/1 X Mn · Manganese 1055--::;;p ~ ug/1
Carbol'llll .. , mg/I ·-Na -Sodium 929 mg/I
Blcut,onate ''° moll V NH31&N610 ,/~· mg/I NI · NI ck el 1067 ug/1
>< Arsanlc;Totat 1002 n U011 ....,, TKN IS N 625 /) , 'J mg/I )<' Pb -Lead 1051 1'1':'1 _Q ug/1
Carbon dlo~!de .(05 mg/I V Noa: -t-N03 as N 630 .-/\,< mQ/1 s, -Selenium 1\/~ r
>< Chloride 9.(0 1/ ' mg/I " P:Tolal IS P 665 . ,:: x Zn • Zinc 1092 t' -\ti', ug/1-moll
Chromlum:Hai 1032 uo ,i JUL' 1 .•; 1QLJL•
Colo!:True BO Pt-Co
Cyanide 720 mg/I \Vilr.iineton Regional Offic~.
X
,// .,;-77/,,// Q_ r ~ tJI\ (' A?.A11,(J J,117':::/-_£ L~ -/J ..k!_ ,....,_ ; .. /.:·: . .;.,:
'// , Lab Comments: ' 'I
GW-54 Revised 7/85
-u I
For Dissolved Analysis -submit filtered sample and write ·01s· in block
White copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region Yellow copy -Lab
LUST. OTHER
• etc.)
OrQlnoehlorln, Pe,tiC:!~••
Oroanoo~ ~~~t9trS,P.!,!1f~~:'1' t"lic--=1 @ !1111"'.~LSLl \VI I~
Acid Her 1:f!~.~s""' -~
1.aUI
Base / Neutral EJ.t'/a'Jub~@rgi.'~Ul),
Acid Extr1ct1ble Organic•
GRflllNDWAHR '-l'r.Tlf\N
Purge ab• !/R.!9.~IJ I e st(Y.O':J~oW.ll!hl ncr 'r
1,2 -Oibromoalhana (EDS)
_;__ r,c,r.. • N\CS • St.t. ~ I Ir"-" -_ __,.,,..RT .
n,,n ..
--:;--,&2,(:-:::: :(-//·'. :,;;.. 1 / . \ :11'
I! Ii?\ i.,~"'?l-~/~-~~~:-1o;,. \ \r'·· ( ,, \ ~; i R
[I L~:J ·«,,:: ;!_I~ -,-1!, § -.. 1 ·,.:;;;;;.)~o-;
" ---.· I
,/COUNTY
OUA0 UO NO. ___ _ C(-~1,o-SERIAL
LAT. ~3~4uf~~~P~5 __ LONG. _?~t=0~9~/i-
Report to: ARO, FRO, MRO, RRO, WaRO~,
WSRO. Kinston FO 0 the r ________ _
Shiooed by: Bus~Other ______ _
r.-> s· I 'c '--COLLECTOR(S): -{<.... • , .. ~ o......-{)vJ. DATE
FIELD ANALYSES
N.C. ·.,,-PARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOUR'-.. J LAB NUMBER 8 55'.G 96
Owner
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
SAMPLE PRIORITY
ROUTINE D EMERGENCY
E RECIT,!.~D-X~ime')?; ':(:)
d by: !f+-i:+'-l1Jll-l-7l'J_..,_ / From: Bu~
er ·
DATA ENTRY BY:~ CK~)
DATE REPORTED: 7-/~
TIME PURPOSE: BASELINE, OMPLAIN COMPLIANCE, LUS,, OTHER _____ _
· e one)
\JS
oll 400 4,Jl Spec. Cond.94 ~a12s0c
Temc.10 "2..Q 0 c Odor r"\ot\.g___
Apr)earance /.,~b ± bro:i"raste':=========-
Field Analys1~, By:J<. s~-Jo rl l..-' j-~-,_
Descriptton of sampling
L oc at i on or s i te _[aid'1:S...J:'.i:.~-~d!:._ _ _i!~,;~~~~::!~~_Jjg~1.._-~'!....:::'.,,_.J.~~Q._.f:i.~:::'._~---
~=~~;..!l_J_~~~=-..fU_1.!.:::..!::._!__::1L5d,~.:.+.J--~V~S f 'V',b poi n
b I .s J •1 Samplina Method
v.ieU •6
LABORATORY ANALYSES
8005310 mg/I ')C. Diss. Sollds 70300 1 ~D mg/I Ag -$(Iver 1077 ug/1 Or~~l').;~•--s_!t,cj~~._. nr--i.-
COO High 340 mg/I fluoride 951 mg/I Al • Aluminum 1105 ug/1 .--.1c3i1-7 l'I I , 'l '.,., ~, n, Org1no OSDhOt.U~ P.:•tt cldll _ _.,._ ... ,,, ..........
COD low 335 mg/I Hardness:Total 900 X B1 • B1rlum ·1007 < 5CO 111i:v -.~Ill mg/I ug/1 ..
Colilorm:MF F"ecal 31616 1100ml IJ Hardness (non-cerb) 902 mg/I c, · Calclum 916 mg/I Aci"-H•~icides ~
Coli!orm;MF Total 31504 · 1100m ~ )<. Phenols 32730 ~ ug/1 )<. Cd -C1dmlum 1027 < ;:i ,/\ uetl JUL 25 1988
X TOC 560 ~ mg/I 11 I'-Specllic Cond. 95 uMhostcm 1 '><' Chromium:Tot1I 1034 '"'C" ~ ug/1 Bise / Neulral ExlrlCllbll O'rQanlcl
Turbidity 76 rnu Sull1te 945 mg/I >< Cu· Copper 1042 < \I\ i= ug/1 Acid Ex_t~.~••='t',W(2~~.!fl~!~TlfUJ
Sultlde 745 men V fa • Iron 1045(\\t,O(I . ug/1 Wll MINr.TnN J;l-►nJOO.AI t\t'C'I"'--
Hg • Mercury 71900 ug/1 y Pureeable Org1nics (VOA bollle)
x: pH 4 03 /J,4 uni ts K -Po1asslum 937 me/J
Allo.alinlly 10 pH .t.5 410 mg/I Mg • M1gn11lum 927 moJI 1,2 • Olbromo11h1n1 (EOB)\
AlJ..a!inlly to pH 8. 3 4 15 mg/I >< Mn -M1nean111 1055 :=JN\ ,·<"" ug/1 • Carbonate 445 mg/J Na • Sodium 929 mg/J
·s1cart,ona1e .t40 mg/I Y. NH31sN6IO .. o~ mg/I NI • Nickel 1067 uc/1 ,rr •-· _ .
X Arsenic:Tolal 1002 <If", ug/1 'i.. TKN II N 625 tJ,5' mg/J V Pb -Laad 1051 . Qt 1Q ug/l I\ A> A• • •-. -•vv
Carbon dlo,rtde 405 me/I Y-N02 -t NQ3 as N 630 ,, q moll . Sa -Selenium 1147 ug/1 •~• v,<t
>< Chloride 940 q mg/I ')( ?:Total aa P 665 %,,/'1 me/I >< Zn • Zinc ~· .... ,.l..lg/1-
Chromlum:Hex 1032 ug/l 111, -.. -· ~-. "'•: ;=i,;·-.•_,,-~, -.,.,,---..-.. -.
Color:Tn,e BO Pl-Co VVL. ,6 0 l~bb i ~ r~ T, · ;i,J , .. ~-;~ _l!i_ \f://i 1½~!~1
mg/I I I':) -~ -~.-"'" '.~;' l.:! '~ i Cyanide 720 ' ,!/' , /;//, I -r971_o [/ ./"> .:H jJ O , f' ~ ·1':? ;~"f"'f ;-.,v"~-£} l \ /} ~ ·_~JJi"fil rJ -,_ n /J·rr J --·-----.: 'O Lab Commen!s. ~ -, '
'/ ' u I ,JUL ,:; .l l:1/jt /
c;---:,----,--------,c---c,..,--,--.,.....,--;--,-----:--,-,-=c---:---,----,---,,--c=-;--=-,--,--,-,....-,---lllU.LI..LJ:lll.'llLB..U..!LJJ:.W..lillJ_ GW-54 Revised 7/85 For Dissolved Analysis -submit ffllered sample and write ·01s· in block
While copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region Yellow copy -Lab RALEIGH, NC
COUNTY · N.C. (.,,i'PARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOUR\..-,
SY-"~O C:.C.-33, o -
LAT.~/7QS:
SERI Al NO.
LONG.
Report to: ARO, FRO, MAO, RAO, WaRO, '@
WSRO, Kinston Fo· 0 !her ________ _
Shipped by: Bus~ Other ______ _
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM 1)
SAMPLE PRIORITY t7
,BJ ROUTINE O EMERGENCY
the r -------,=--------,...--,---=
DATA ENTRY BY:~ CK: ~
DATE RE PORTED: ___ 7...L..-_,__/ _.'1...:~:_'ll'-"-'Ct..__
COLLECTORCSJ: R, 5iloy-<,W1'~ATE l7('1AY88 TIME PURPOSE: BASEUNE,~. COMPLIANCE, LUST, -=t4:, rcle one)
OTHER _____ _
FIELD ANALYSES Owner --C.PA ·.S-
r 3° 1i::-rQ . · 11 o II , wp,· 1., r,. 1 " PH400~· ~ Spec. Cond.94 ~a12s0c Locarion or site [91;::Q'r:J . _±_ ...:::::..-+-<...
Temo.10 J9 °c Odor H2=S?""'r='"r.lUIW'\rDescription al sampling point Crno,,..,:/-u.,,.,'..,c,
I I I.\ __ ___.___ I ·( I
Appearance :,~, hn::>~l\Taste Samp1· Meth d b <\ 1 ~ r -.r..r • ,ng 0
~ 5 \·de :i: \) vi ~· c... '"'L '"• Ii
. (p.Cmp, baller, etc·.)
Field Anatysis By: Ren1arks l ! -,, hr,, " ..,_ I '_L -~ ~ On f '-" -:J
C-,~ k Ac ... ,s S:vl:,J,·v(J,',,.. JvJ«o, I\/
cJ ulu-+ ·• f n NC, 87, n J UJ ,1,/7(;
e n e ' Sampl I I r al N 3 -IO ' b / ✓ J
s..f.o. k~ t,.J It .j.p ..-,,,.,,, I..,,,.., v-. :7
~~ I l " ef w/ J.r ._r-crt{'i? "' (pumping time, air tet', e,ll J . N 3,'\o, \(o ~' i .f 7.. I • • { ,. 'J . LABORATORY ANALYSES NOT~: I) " ... \, <.,_ -h, b'\, I b,"l :\A I lovw-d '-''--1-e -/-Iv,_ Uq__.v-._ ( o. IJI '-' ~ I ! 'if ,e /,J,
B0D5 310 mg/I IX DJ.ss, Solids 70300 I ":I.., A mg/l Ag · Silver 1077 ug/1 Organochtorin• P•Uicld•s
COD High HO mg/I Fluoride 951 mg/J Al • Aluminum 1105 ug/1 Orp.!.!!,?~Phor~s PuticlClu . COD Low 335 mg/I Hardness:Total 900 moir X B• • Barium ·1001 (~/;; ug/1 I IJ JI '.:i.i f:1~· II \V/1 t'l fl
CoJllorm:MF Fecal 3 1616 1100ml {; Hardness (non·carb) 902 mg/I C1 • Calcium 916 mg/I Ac(d}H~}d1@a.r--..,, llC.111
Colllorm;MF Toial 31504 1100ml "'IX Phanol, 32730 ;;.:'~/\ ug/1. X Cd • Cadmium 1027 ( ;J ,/\ ug/1 l!Ul "") II I>< TOC 680 7::J mg/J I Spaclllc Cond. 95 uMhos/cm1 ;x. Chromium:Total 103'1 W·. ug/J Base / N • u !~~~IE l I r,!,cJ.• b t,-.)~.!,.O a ni c ,
Turbldl1y 76 /HU Sulfate 945 mg/I )< Cu • Copper 1042 ( 1() ug/1 A Cid EllflCllble Organic,
Sulfide 745 mg/I L,X Fe • lron 1045 ;Sj,000 ug/1 . ------------------Ho -Mercury 7 1900 ug/1 V Purge ,'dj\V(m;i''~~~.1 (VoA)1b'6Mlfi' ·--
'>< PH 403 ... I uni I.S I( • Potassium 937 mg/I YIIUIIUI\Jl un n.ununn1o. VI I·---
Alkalinity 10 pH 4.5 410 mg/I Mg· Magnesium 927 motl 1,2 • Olbromoe1h1ne {EOBJ
Alkallnl ty 10 pH 6. 3 4 15 mg/I X. J.Cn • Manganeu 1055 8'10 ug/1
Carbonau 445 mg/I Na • Sodium 929 mg/I ~EE Arr~-,.,,,.. .......
Blcaruonate 440 mg/J lX NH3asN6\0 I ... ljl m1111 Ni -Nickel 1067 ug/1 ANAi YCIC
.. . -,x Arsanic;Totar 1002 <(\(l ug/1 V TKN as N 625 /. • 'II moll I,'\ Pb • Lud 1051 'll ug/1 . • .. .'. __ ,;..-,_-r'----:':'
Camon dio~iCle 405 mg/I IV N02 ~ N03 U N 630 6 A~motl S• • Selenium 1147 ug/1 ~, 1r·\ 1/',-:i 11:.?! ;i\\J/.V l t/ \ ~ 1~ X Chlorldv 940 ..::M) mg/I X P:Total as P 665 • /Cj X Zn -Zinc 10\lo'-C.l.,:;if.=.l v C.~ '¥ lt":r-i~f;_,_.::-..?.-r:"·.! ~-_:: ,: i ,,, ·'· mg/I ' \/ ! ~i
Chromium:Hel 1032 ug/J 1111 \ f, .,,. .. '! tJ; --. --·
Color;True 60 Pt·Co --' L. LJ ..J 1.:iuo I i~ ,.~...-~
" " ')1 , f'l.f) (
Cr•nlCla 120 ' mg/I
'"" . ---
Lab Commenls ~ r JI e /1/ t:J~.5 /t ffmc /, '/011/vY "j;J7f/1/_-:,,, ":5 0 0.iu<i1 N~iili.R--~!ON
' I
GW-5-4 Revised 7 /85
.
,·· -,..
For DissolV8d Analysis -submit filtered sample and write •01s• in block
While copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region Yellow copy -: Lab
RAIEIGI-\, ~'C ,·/
/'°UAD NO. CC-3;; o-
/ LAT. 3'£/70,-
SERI AL NO.
LONG. 7% 00\ II
.N.C.VPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOUR\....,,
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
DEM
LAB NUMBER 8
DATE
• Rec'd by: From:
Aepop ... to: ARO, FRO, MAO, RAO, WaRO, f!!S§si:!. . GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM Other --------==------.,...,--,..._
y\1t11J/DATA ENT~YBYYD CKJ)fll SAMPLE
WSRO, Kinston FO Ottier,-~----~-
Ship_~-~d -by: Bus,~. ~ther
coLLECTORCSJ: Mst).,., .. (d.
ROUTINE
PRIORITY
~--DATE REPORTE6: . 7-/9-i~
DATE /7MA~88 TIME
FIELD ANALYSES
l:ABORATORY ANAL:YSES
mg/I
260 Hlgh·34Q mg/I . Fluorld1 951 '\. mo/I ·_-;_Al-· AIUm.J_fl\l_m 1105 ug/1
coo·i:o_~--33~ mg/I f'-+--"-"~•~••~u~:_r_o•~•-• _•o~_o_·~· '-',,----~mcc•_J,~ X-' :~·aii • Barium ·1001 4.'.")(1") uo/1
';'co1u_ofnj':~F Fecal 31616 /1001111, l/ Hard~~~-.':'trlon-c·ari:i)'"9()2 .-.m,ii'n: ,"-_C•1· ~•)cli.im.91 __ 6 ·. mg/I
t--irc---c-."·1,"'10-,..,,;,7~'M~F-T-,-.. -,-,-15-o-,---,-,,-O-,O-m-:'1,,,~.L,1t--tx::-:;,l--:P:'h,"n",.:.,."·-',,:.,.:,c.o,:.:="--'-=----= ')----.,." .. ,"'i-':I::: I~-~c1·--_ Clidmllim ~·1021 . ~ d-1' uoii; I/>:-. .. ,; .~ .
.x. '·. ! oi:.. 6 60 < ~ mg/I Specillc Cond. 9~ . _UMho_s/c m ~. I \, ·. ~,,,,"-7.>l. f:,c;".'·: ~"'·r-,"',,,-,_,"'.,:-. :T-,-.. -,.:.cc,oc.:, ... -.-.l:!' (_'::"JI~:'=-.-'-_-::,:-,,::,,: I :-.:· fc-'',Cj, "'•"· .-."'·;"-,,., N",",-.. -.-, -,-.-,,-.-,-.. -,-,.-a.,.,.-.-.-, ,-.--j
NTU
. .~Q(l
~-
. -.· . . .
8Jca,bon•1• .4_40 mg/J
""" mg/I
I~ 1 · Cb10f1 .. oe 940 -, mg/J
ug/1
Pt·Co
GW-5 ◄ Revised 7/85
...
. · ·:.
'• I,><.,
Iv .,,,
_SU1t81e s4s .·. . ··~Oi1' ':)<:, '·_Cu·· Copp.·r;·1_04'~···: ·<,\·o ug/1 Acl~--~~~~~~t·1~~r~:.o~J-~1.~'!l1:~~----
Sullld• 745
;
·:·,_.•' ·.-;··· ": .;
NH3 .. N 610 ~ ·I I
TKN .. N 625 A • J
NO:z: -t, N03 UN 630 . ,,,.;:;
·mg11 )< \F.•::· .. 1ron:·1045 . J.\4fl(). ug/( "IUfUll\ltVn I\L.IJ.lVUt\L VHJ~
mg/I
mg/I. X
mg/I
ug/1
· 'mg/I
ug/1.
ug/1
-Pb • L•■ d 1051 ug/1
·}sit· .. S1l1nlum· i"§:"(r-.r.1v·.__II 1
··"" . -·.-r·· ; n_r~~n nRr::-Ar\(1'rC:: .. :.
·.o . .rl!AI YC.:IC:. Ri=-P"PT
.· .. ...e. ..... ,.. . .
-.:f>:Total=u 'P}665 , l)o/. mg/I X ··zn.·· zinc 1092 . ~ 10 ug11:
.
,• _;.',, .. ' . . VUL ._.-·
For·Dls_SO/ved··AnalySis --sub!'Tlit filtered sample and w.rite •01s~ 10 ·_bloc'k·· ·
White c_opy Headq:Uarters · P.ink copy -<Region_·. :ollo_w':i::opf·-Lab
COUNTY
LABORATORY ANALYSES
COO High 340
COO L_ow 335
,Colllcirm:MF Fee11 31616
; Colllorm:MF Total 31504
_ rcic::6~o .-
Turb.1d11Y· 76
,a
mg/I
!"OIi
mg/I
/IOOml
'1100ml
mg/I
NTU
' f.1,:J. units
.. .. •• . -· . ~--_.
A_lkallni_ly to PH ,.s .• 10 moll
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
"'" mg/I
mg/I
ug/1
Pt·Co
Cr•nl_c;I• 120 mg/I
·ow-54· Re.vised 7/85
' '
\·
N,C.~f'ARTMENT Of NATURAL RESOUR~
& "COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Sullldl 7-45
X NH3 u N s·1o'
lx ·. TKN;:~.--N 6_25·-· .;;(:f_ .
,,;:.. NOf,-t.N_o·3··· N.63o
N .:.P_:Total •• P 666
. . .. :•.:.
D_EM.
ICC
F:or; DI ssof'vect;:Analysl s -sub-mi t· fll_1ered_ sa.rnple __ arid, wti t0 •01 S • In block,•·
· Whl_te·p_·C?P) ~eadquarters :r,ink.: cop"y -::F!'egion . Yellow,::c·opy Lab
•
._-
11 !L }.!! 198f
-· ...
·,; \/l~H'.D C:~CJION
COUNTY g,..Ljk:J J(.,..J ,'c. k
QUAD NO. CC-3'5, 0 -. , . SERIAL NO .
LAT ~4/705°" LONG 71? 04 I I
N.C.VPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURv
& COMMUNITY DEVELO_PMENT
DEM Rec'd by:
/ Report to· ARO, FRO, l,1AO, ARO, WaRO, ~ GR OUN D W A TE R FI EL D / L AB· FOR M other --.,--"-::;:::-,------:,...,.,-=--
iV, SAMPLE PRIORl~Y·---· \J rn u; _/ATA ENTRY BY,:~ WSRO, Kinston FO Other ________ _
Shlpp_~:~·.,'.by: Bus_,~ Ot.her
COLLECTOR(SJ( f._ s:Jo.,-,,vl<.'toATE
·IA) ROUTINE □ EM.EAGENCY ~-c--c~--. D DATE REPORTED:_·--•~c,,·\~·•_;'-'_.,.,--c_..""'-,-_;_-'a..,:'---
1 z. MA YiS TIME ) I', 11':!"" PURPOSE: BASELINE, OOMPLA;;v). COMPLIANCE, LUS,, OTHER -----
FIELD ANALYSES
T em~. 10 2,C 0c
Appearance li?Jb\:;iv:i',7
Fiold Analysis By: '7<
"8005310
. '. ~00 High 340
COO Low 335
Colllorm:MF f1.1cal 3 1616
" --.: Colllor~:MF Total 31504
V :rOc 6eo
Turbldily 76
''>< pH 403
Alk1llnlly lo pH 4. 5 4 1 0
··Al1oii11niiv to PH 8.3 ., 5
C1rbon,11e 445
Bicartoonate 440
~ A,Mnlc:Total 1002
Carbon dioxide 405
)< · Chloride 940
,.-c'hfoinlum:Hn 1032
Color:ln• 80
. Cy_anlde 720
Lab· Comments:
GW-54 Revised 7/85
mg/I
mg/I
mg/I
1100ml
1100ml
qr.:, mg/I
NTU
5.<>< uni Is
mg/I
. mg/I'
mg/I
mg/I
I'\\?-, """ mo/I
Jy, moll
ug/1
P!·Co
mg/I
.... tcTrcie one)
£PA
I>< Dias. Solld& 70300 . n(>"/'J ·moll .-Ag -suv,i-1077 ug/1
Fluoride 951 mo/I-· .Al -Aluminum 1105 UQ/1
: Hardlleu:TotaJ 900 mg/I y. . -( "',/V'\ :·B•· -Barium ·1001 ug/1
.
Hardness {non-cub) 902 mg/I c, -Calcium "6 moll
>< Phenol& 32730 .5'..I.. u'J/1· X .:"Cd cadmium 1027 <a.O ug/1
Specific Con,;1. 95 · uMhos/cm2 I 7'-Chromlu~:Tot1I 1034 I·" uo/1
Sull•le 945 mg/I x· .. .c, -Copper 10"2 !JI I ug/1
Sulfide 745 mg/I I">< -:,f~. -Jron• 1045 '57 /',()() ug/1
::•·Ho·~ Mercur~ 71900 \.lg/I
. . K .-Pf?IUSlum 937 mg/I
. ·:_wQ·-MeOn.:1ium-92i mO{I
' • X ,··Mn-~ Me~o•nese 1055 "1 (\ . uo/1
No Sodium 929 --mo/I
y NH3 a& N 610 ,5(-mg/I .. i NI Nickel 1067 ug/1
,X TKN IS N 625 /, 0 mo/J :x Pb -Lead 105 I 3'1. uo/1
)<. N02 T N03 u N 630 , n·t mg/I .... se· .. Selenium_.11"7 ug/J.
'i. _P:Tal~i· u P e·e5 , :J ::J. mg/I 'J{. ·zn ~ Zln_c 1092 ~'b .: ug/J.
.. ...
I' I. •r-'IVFI
.'
· .iUL";e:: O 19tlH
WilciogtoR Regi9nal QUh;
For"·_Dl~solved ·Analysis -submit filtered sample ·and write: •01s• In bloCk
White copy -_ Headquarters Pl_nk co_py ~-Region· Yellow: copy·-Lab
.
IX-
.
--
o;O~~cj,1 ci_,Tn! JP.J~_I,; i~~~• I~ Ill\
-lllttl-4 or~,•,,U:,pho1pharu1 ""'"'';.~III U
'-lll.Jr (,,::J
Acid 1••1 H1!rd(C:l_d11 25 1988
·BaH b~.--·~.v.,!1~~.'!-!t•: 1e_itl,•19.'.~-·•nl c & .
· AcJ..~1 (~11,t~~a,l,•.~J •~9.~~.• .. n,M !' rn:i:1r.i:
Puroe•ble Organics {VOA ballle)
..
1,2 Oibromoelh1n1 (EOB)
' .
. -,...,1<1 __ ., ·., -. ....... .:_,--:-··-· -···
)"G"-: ~~ .. ..-/{ ~ ;-.~~ \~,;:: :_,·)·.;,;;M;-·n i:f,'J)r,. \\ .. _~,)_f\!J \~\? !~•i ! ,,
, I
i'~\ \ /~·:,·J ~-~:-;~. -i !1
;; K
l.}\I:\ -_. -L
,JUL (:, .l 198>
,.i;_G I: Vi
;_1 .'1
ijl ·Ji
,,
• . -... '>,Jt;,,J, ,.·. ~ .__,,.,..~_
Cbeclu!d by ~
4 • ORGANIC ANALYSIS
l!Dtered_b~
Ch cited by.i:f'lt • y cc .1 ,.
Lab No. Samo le Type : \"-~ _,. Analvtical Results
~. '4R_{"\ \..\ .... \I. \..l ;\. -_,..,._ .. ~ I ' .. l \._, r;.c:-/~t>. \\ ~
I
.l\ .• I . .l \ , \t ...l. -· -'K \~ "\, ·. . __ \ .. \ r\ -·-1711, l I ' ' ._, __ --
:i. <-l -,._ I'"'\ ,..__ ..._ __ -\ ... ,. .. Ll_ '-I~~\ 'l .\_..._\ I I • "----.~1!4'.\ . A\ •.. \""-•----• ; ~c.i o., \ . ""'~ ,.., a--• ,,,.__.
f\r,,,. 'Vo. ,,~. ~ 1~"-I '·, ~~} h. .. f_l\ lb 1l'\. ... -
4
..
.
;.;,.,.;.ir,;;i;;:io:;r;-, nr.,.--...
~(J~~lSLl \YJ H1 !Ill
Lill "LY)
JUL .:;o IY8f
nDn11l\mw11Tr:n <"r,..T,n.u
-. -.. WILMINGTON REGIONAL OfFICf
____ GC/HB/DS ueed
Concentration
)(\('\ .. • II
,J,;; •• ~ )1
ll!.r'I ..• 'II
!Jf\r." .• /I
. 9'."\('\"~''
('\c'\I'\ I,~ fl
l\(V\,,_ ,, (
\ll'll\ "~/ L
Q
l
·--f"\ I --~
N.C. ~iPARTMENT Of NATURAL RESOUR,_(i
& COMMUNITY .DEVELOPMENT
DEM From:
Report to: ARO, FRO; MAO, RAO, WaAO, "@ GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
. SAMPLE •. PRIORITY
. o_ ttie,.· ___ ---'--'---· ·
0th r ---~~-'-------'-~7::.-.~--
T A ENTRY BY C2 6K:;;cuM
DATE REPORTED~---'-----"zL·· •·_-,._1_,_1_:"'9"--~-"'--'d·_r. J:W.·. ROUTINE
Shipped by: Bus, ~-'·Other-------'-._,·,,-:. ,·
COLLECTORCSJ M~IJ DATE /2MA~88r1ME fl:2.,$
WSAO, Kinston FO
FIELD ANALYSES
PH4 00 "5,35soec.
Odor ~tJ"'-"'N"""-«--T_emp.10 19 °c
~ppearance clPury Taste------
F i e Id Ana I ysi s 8 y: _ _,/1."-"_,.(,~_,.··.,,,=..,,_.{_,J.,_ __ _
LABORATORY ANALYSES
8005310 mg/I X
owner u.s
Diss. Sollds -70300
COO High 3•10 . mg/I "Fluorlde 951
COO Low 335 mg/I Hardness:Total 900
Collform:MF Fecal 31616 /1 O_Omt Herdtiess· {non-cirb) 902
Colltorm:MF To1al 31·so:C .. .· '1100ml X Phanols 3273.0
iiPA
·.:·: ·.,;_ :,
~ f} mo/I
moll
~
moll
!Tio/I
~ uo/1
□ EMERGENCY
.PURPOSE: BASELINE, -~MPLAl;i,: COMPLIANCE,
(circle one)
LUST, OTHER --"'-----'--
CPA
Ao •"Sllyer 1077 .. ug/1 Oroarlochlorlne P•1f!cld•1-:."..-,.
Al.· Aluminum 1105. .. --uo/1 Or~,,p-!1~1phorU1--P;.Ueldu~~
X Be· Barium :too1 I "'"A """ IVJI~: ' i_ , ir1 11 \ I
. Ce· Calcllim 915 .-.-.· mg/I Acl~ lt1~!~~-1•de1 ·~1111
)< Cd • Cadml um 1027 '( " {\ ug/1 _ iU.U .. ~
" TOG 680 a4 moll Specllfc Cond. 95 uMhos/cm 1 '-£. ChrOmlum:Total 103 ◄ ] c}M ug/1 Base / Neutrs!iL'E!iraj;1abr·• oroa~1c,
Turbidity ·,7 6 , NTU Sulfa1a 9 ◄ 5 moll . )( Cu • Copper 10-12 ;;i~ ur;i/1 Acid Extractable Organics .
Sulfide 7 ◄ 5 mo/I ? Fe • Iron 10:Cs .?.'7 /YY) ug/1 I •on11Nnwa, rn Sfr.TIC>i'l
. Ho· Mercury 71900 ug/1 111 rx PurOM~ ~~;Q,co,a.'1!!: sJJYR!':\~.gtt_1 •1fflf'J:1
S: ~.Units
•u-:••-· -
IX pH ◄03 .. K • Po!asslum 937 mg/I
Al!otallnlty 10 PH <1.5 ◄ 10 mg/I . Mg : M_aonui~m 927_' mo/I 1,2 -Olbromoe!hane (EOB)
Alll~tinlty 10 pH B.3 4 15 mg/I l'>l Mn -Manganese 1055 S-1"\ Ug/l
Carbonate 4 ◄5 mg/I . Na -Sodlu!11 929 mg/I
Blcar~onate 4~0 ·•. · mQ"/1 "-. NH3111N510 . ., \".-~:· mg/I NI -Nlcke! 1067 ug/1
IX N? ~ --,..;•. "')(, "j'{\ ... . -_, . ·' , ....... . .. ,
ArS&nlc:Total 1002 """ TKN as N 625 mg/I Pb • Le ■d 105 1 ug/!
.
· N02 •. N03 ·as N 630 '\/"_ ·mg/I Se -Selinlum ~ .... .,;..,.,. Cartion dioxide ◄OS moll ' . •' .1·1 ◄ 1 ---:-·· ., .. V q r>.. P:Tolal ai p 565 ,.., '')(_ q 1.-~ .'.> ) ' . : ; Zn ·: Zinc 1092 _ ug/1 I':><" Chforlde 9◄0
Chromlum:Hex 1032
Color:True 80
Cyanlda 720 ..
\/ :711 Lab Commen'tl\
GW-54 Revised 7/85
mg/I mg/I ;
uol! .. 1111 01
~
Pl·Co
mg~I · ... . : Wilrnimrton Rec
1111. 1,,--t;ci; . ,i Ju--.. ,;;,, J~ '/;; 6/J J, :.~ . R)/1 /J.J-, I ·¥--PFR'
tJ u .
•,
For Dissolved Analysis .A submit filtered sample and write ~01s· in block
White copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region Yellow copy:-Lab
' 1' " , ...
ona Off cc .
L:--:U\, :•;,.'' -~ 'r ., .. .-. ,.--·. ' .. . .
l : i ~, ~: ,_.:' i; t ""a . ..,,_ .. >
'.•
•
1
Rep,;,r~ed by '.:::> TA • ANALYTICAL RESULTS '
Cbeck.ed by ~'': ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Supervisor c-R{,t;' -
Entered b
Checked by
Lab No. Storet II Sample 1vne: \ Al n °"t7Y,. Concentration
Cf(_. l.J. » l "~ ~~\ I ) -l' ; f hC 1"\~TL -;n "'n , :'.:)~ 11n/1
I -1 n Ta c ln rl " t •
J
(, c 11Jr10 I P1'rl
I I I .
')~(<.,\ T~ ll("" J "1 , {) (\C'i 11,. r.
J4 ~ '1 I (t J • . ;:_
,If Al"\-. J'\ n / ' ~ 0 ("\ ,-1.,/, ~-,~~·\· 1/'f\ -( I o~rP" li <. D l\ "ft., l( ••
'k1S";'I ('\ --( 'Y1 1o""o J l'lO~~,• ·'
)tit)~ () l 'B () ""'-,.,. ll / ..... n .,) '7.(J t\ l\ ;,~./,
-rln""t n rt~ ,r Y\ t J J
f~ r If-' 1· r _.)
I
.
•. I
~,;-;;;ar.;;i;;::inn nr-,,-....
lr(Jt1~1.51.l 1!/), " ' ' ' Lill ~.L'JJ
JUL -'U 198,
nf'l.n11un111,-, I"'~ "'"""''"'' -.. ~-··-·····-·· ----··-·· WILMINGTON REGIONAL OfFICF
___ GC/HS/DS used
· Rl!ported by_5~L __
Clu,cked by (LJft • ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Supervisor~C:. K, Entered by i'YA--·
Checked by kfTY\ ~~ _.l ¼Ii ,' '
Lab No. Sample Type : I\\ .J. o~ Analvtical Results
\r.:.1,1~9 ' ' ~,~· \_ -,~· -" 'i '-\ <t I.
~n, l ~-•• .,I. n ,-4 ,.(;, .l 1' ,.-\c.
~ ...\. ., ,.\ r .\ \-.., r..!'/l\~\\
' '
I\.... __ -r, -~ lj C"\ "-r,
\ --~ _\ I:~; r b.a..-..l<-
~-.\ .. ..Ll 1,..,.. r ... t'f~\1'.
" I
•
'
~
. Wl~~WTIWlftl'ir:'
Ii\~ --·r'(E:;~ll ~ED _,_. ~ ' 'f! " Ali(; 1 Jil:J""' ? a 1noo
I ~11.~1.,. ll 'lj 11 ---.. ,_.
Jl\l ..... GROUNDWATER sfcflm~-.~--""' vuico . , .
JUL 27 1981 'OIUIUI\U I vtt n.t.UlVhrw.. vrr lllt
r.1m11Nnwarn1 <:err1nN
RALEIGH. NC
___ GC/MS/DS used
Concentration
C\.19 ...... IL
u
J/-. ..3 ,l/,> /fl
O'
l
Reported by $T-L3
Checked by tt
Supervisor ']?£/<
Lab No. Storet II
l<lr_-c::;,-...,
ANALYTICAL RESULTS • Date ~/4/4-gr I I
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Entered by~
Checked by~
Samole Tvoe: \Al r, To I\
N {'\ , ,-0 .I"\ T'. 0 ~ ' ~(\ fl/V\'l ( ,._,
-r\o-1 ,O,rTnr hi.0
r-r /l/,,.0( ~:r1 / I
I J
in\~~~TI'iWTT:'IB
~,~---'I ~111 ·
blll,.ll i;.;.
1111 9A lOOQ --
GROUNDWATER SECTION
WILMll'll:illll1 nt.lll\Jlllll. vrrn,r.
___ GC/HS/DS used
Concentration
.._
· Reported by 5 TA , • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Checked by C,J\ ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Supervisor 'K'c:t Entered by l\~
Checked by M__, rr!
Lab No, Storet 11 Samole Tvoe: \I\/ (\;-fl A Concentration
, i r~ -c;; , \ N,-., \N::l. Q A "t ( o , r-.-i n. ri. A/\ ', r J\. ,
rJ. o ln .r Tr r ~ .. -J
r.. c.., U"'! i\l ...>
I
T ..S.r ~ ' I I IV\. ,..{\ I ~II~.-. J -r\...
Pn rA r,:, -_ (, r-ln V-a (' • ,., r (
r-. I I C'~ c_, I ? ~ A
J I
ri\fr;l~ls ll\VJffl'iii\ i,~ ..... -... 1-1 ~1111
'-6'-ll (.!,I
1111 f)Q: lt'lnl''\ ---. .,., ..,
GROUNDWATER SECTION
WIUIIIJlblUl1 lll:.lilUMI. UHlt;f.
..
___ CC/HS/OS used
..
(."'
. Reported by ..> T.,/)
' Checked by cJ\-
Supervisor ~EK
Lab No. Storet II
(~ r_:_ ~ I (')
• ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Entered by \)./A
Checked by.MJ.._
Samnle Tvne: \J\J -h A'
N-r--, r-c-. o r.:r : " . 'P(\(l fl•-~ r A ,
-.J • ir. ~--1"" r h .. J
r.,. r I l..1._,, 0 _J -,
-~ I l , r .• ~ _o " .,_, ·. l A _,.,o
{) ,, r, -t? rl iff--. ':~. ,.J
'h . . r.. r () ,-r
j
rr;)~/'r.J~TIWJ1!;11 fl
~\!.!-1'-' .. ~Ill
UUI -1111 '>A lGRR -
GRO'JNDWAIER SECTION ................. ,,.. WILNllNblUl1 tu:.UlVllnl-...........
.
___ GC/HS/DS 'Jsed
Concentration
•
·,
.
-
..
Reported by S IL3
Checked by 0 j\_
Supervisor~~
Lab No, Storet (J
.~L-ljg\ ~q." =c... \ 1.-. -
-: UC'\-~~
) 1 '~ \
) ,· <:;: ~ i
~ I~~~ 1, c:; (\ \ . ~
-:Z...l I f"\ I ("'i
,a.':\,...-,
'1'111"
• ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Entered b~ ~.i.f\
Checked byf[}/J/
• Date ©,P/f?Z
Sample Type: \J,-,.lnA,
I '\ _ ~-11\ 'f'n ....... -~ ,..._. .AA II ...
} -,..J D7 0 ,, , -,..._ I • • r r.. r / L n. u _)
' I
aolV""f")n~ ~
M. V" .I V'I. 0
t-"-GY\1 ll ~ ~
ft\tl~\ V I ,-~ I I Kt.rr-..,...
fl,_-l ~. ,..._ A•l l h r n-I A" ~ ,, .
T..!>, l
.
.... a
>-HA. 1\0M7f1 0 )
' .t'\._L, ... • ..... -" )<_O a ~1" I\)
r '.t,,:-+.rl Lu... ~ f.J /.0; ri u .
1 ,..J .r 0 M---~ ,,.~-a11 .. t; 0/n-rl
Po" , " u . r() n ~I! T '1 17, r a
~ r • r-r Dir
I ~ I
~'ir-l~,.:11,,1 r,r.;ir.-,.
l~(J'1i~(.SU \.1 Lt Ill
Li~ "'l!!)
JUL ;:;o J~/j/j
,._tl'(\liAlr.\.\rll"rCD ~C'/"'Tl/'\M .. 'i!lllllll!i'l&TOtl REGIONAi. OFFICE
___ GC/HS/DS used
'
Concentration
n. t I 110 ,
J
~ \ \'.> I 1 'If L /,.. r' .2_). T) IJ
I\ t-(\ I JK 'I
'L,-1,...J,
~~ II J/,
I, c:; I .u i,
<J {) 11'1. / I
a.1?,.r!IL
v
\
..
Clacked by ~
Superviao~K
• ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Entered by7)A, qf)
Checked ,,. ' ·~ Lab Nn. Sample Type: h,..A_ Anal ,;.ti--• 1 Reaulta
· (l,. l.fR1 \\ .... \ .\'. \ . .. ·-.\ \ I .\ h.. t:.I'/ ilhll .. ~ I
-1.\. .\ \. ,.,-~
;l<1=-.'I I ~ • -~"' "" " VV\.•'-~ ·'---fl~~\ • ......... _ ..... \--.tr' .__ -1 ... ' • '~· _\ -\. (""' \ ~ ....... l.t ............
. \. I ! l ',..,, (..rt'f)1l\
I
DJ!~:Ct:;tsU \Y/ I~ n,
I\\" ~ VJ '
11'.-= --1 JUL 26 1988 ::0 ~~·..,r::,·
C, i.;r·~~i
c;_ "~ >' ' .: GROUrwWA 11:.K ~t.l, 11vr, -r:,:Z ,.-:-..... ,"-""'-u or:NnNtil ~C'll"J:' P.,:· -\ __ .,,--···· i:: ~ '' 1': _, l"1 ~> .; ___ ~ rr1 ... . . ..t,"1 ' .. . . ·····-.,,. V, ~ -~
c-:i ·o .. <-·t _, ; .._.. J
' .
____ GC/Ms/DS uaed
'
Concentration
"'-~q .. -,,
~'I •. -l
~"'··-" I "'·' .. : L .
.::-( '
' (
)
"'o ·o ,o 0
i
' ►• ~. ----___.-
,, '' .
. ' ' . ,, t .
,, . . .
. -,,··cj, ,,
/,~~! ,_
o-? @L
0-Z. I Le: I I
oL IL •-f;;, I -2.'i: ·. ' I
l,'J-1 -::) D -::::. ~ -\-1 J ()--"" , I '.-'-"
: '
\i-e<,_.-,YI\"~ l'i.. · I -,~ · \/ j:J<:. '6 'I>· L ~ ..S st· -~-ir-+4.....-.. j't.;°1 .f _.S l,. I • '-(.9 o . ~ ) ("Z .f :r lo::'!~ o ') l\.; '\ -i -A.~ Ii;-•~ ""b.s 'L-.5 1 (.,.S 'LS -L..~ ""'7M$
1
lo-P · L. I e= t> 1> '..J' J' -

(

d w a) €., ~ • 7,, L "' <!..L-L 'd<:i.3
, . , -• • • J
/_.,-/· ,, (, -. C, '.!
,-I -··,
,,
\ )/1 ) ;~11,i: r ·'i I I ,
t '' I I'\. I\ ' ' Ls 1 "
')!.)J0A-.' g
£F'A ~
/(-=. s-':,. "f-"+ I
rf1 v-?--(, c-Io vol. 7. 4 'b Jfi 1/{.t 3
r( 00(;9 .r+ -0 ,. o,, ~ .(:,3 f+ "3
.~ :::-,. 4'b ;)A I I t ,.
l . y --.
' 1,1s-,-I xc-a@
Mi' k ,J N s',;@ ~ I )61-, . .1
-Ul-"A~ -h k¼;( C."'i ~u.-e. .h, uc~
I
n~
IO .<f. .S-
/C.<fq
10:rr
T1): Gi.S-6(@M'r")-S"S--,4({--=-12.. IZ '
~"'L ~
----· £e, ' 1' \-\ ·c. ·~ ·-(.O°l S,'&3 //,., '100 I t1\ I: \3 5.1i 2-.-(!, <!> 11 oO
I I,{ -<-~'h I e, IA "'};: -0
I ·-'I-~ .),Go 1 JOO
•
,j)
JO, G 1 '
H :~e,_ "c
r. b'/ I <f.0 0 <-.\
-1<:t 1 <foo 2-~
S, 3g ----I"=, -
--~---!-----·--·-------. i
z---.: ,,,,. ' ..
,t ,i~•, ·•.Jfy--t:t!;Yt:!°";J~{_:;.:_~,,~~ •. -·. -.. ~':'.:•..-.r.-~.l,2:-:..r>...=•:-.;,p•i,~--•-•,J.J-..!"..,.., -· •~ ~f;f}{i~~~t}f~;//1; ·.I-:.> .: ·
"/
'':
.. ,:
' ,,. ~ ,.
','.'.'• . ~.,_·;~(, \(:'" -~:·::~.
~ .\.\:• ".;: .. ::. : ,:·
"'.J&}.~1
:\;,~ft\Il
'-f:'.·t :_' .
.'.}}ff~
.. ---------•--' :-· · .. -·-. ,-----,----------•------~: ~: ;i , I ............ . ..... . --··-··-·-1-1· ' :---------' .... ,, ________ _
--. _\_;_•-; '. ~-·---i----·---.---------;----
-------.....;.-------:-• __ ; , ___ ! __ , _____ . ··1---:---•-! ____ _
ii_
,----~-,--,---~-------I • .-i --
I ------------.---~·--~-~~--' ' '
I i __ , _________ -------'--'---------·
' '
! ! i
-------•--. -. . '
' ' : j __ . __ '.___ : __ '. _____ , ___ ----
,_
... :/ . . .
. •i~
--~);ft .f/ ,I· ..
{Jt(~:_./
',,,,->-.,.,,,.,,~
.. ,._. /· . .".:.\;_. ..
_.:::::::<---_ .·• ! •• -.·)~;_~~----~-':_'-•• ~. ._ •• :.s. ':-:•(-_._
·,.-.,
--------·--·-· --'-! .. ! •
-"------~-j I___ ;--j-----·.·-··-···
1----_-_·_· __ ..:.i "'-:_: :----:-'. _111 -:=(·:;~ -~:~~~:~.--
: : . ' ' ·1 i • •• : ' . -

.

-
-!-,--' . ! ---··;·-1-···•---·. ·------. ---······ -

.

··-.
, . I ··-·'-··-·-·'-·-·-······ -.---· .--•-! -,-•--·-,--i-·-·-·---···--·, -· -·
, . ---7, 0
1 ' • : ; ' , ---•----•--• --~---'-'-_,_i ; .' .. ,. : __ ,I•--,•• ....... •--,-• ••••-•--••--•••-'-
C--.••• ··--:-•-·:· •-.--' '···.-•··· ····-1·•·-··•· ••-·-· : ···,-·-•.
--------~----•-_ -~---·--·-• ------i ____ 1 ___ --·--·----_ --
1
tr,fi
. ;·:-\,:
... , .. "
I
, . -.,:
· •. -....
. ,.. .,.,,,_ ..... ): ,,. '·~E.;;}!{~ \: ,: : ·-~:~J~ . -·. .w.'lf
.-{;:· :: ,'.t{i:1;:-
_·:.:;i -· · __ ::i_:_,~
,,, • .-'.11.•, .. : ·:·:. ~-
• •
j Ov-, / "i3 A ?R 89 1 ?a 4-S, ·Jo >-• "" ,'c i:. sf O /4._ 1.,,,' .J..~
; lo""' n, ._ 2i'o,..._ ((:'?A ~ -\-7 "-"'>. / oc,q +<e_J o .-_ h, '.I (-J-j,
0 M.1r-, ';) • .,._ w •r C.o "''='\"-LJ +~+ +k ~P,.A,. d,•J 1-\of
qJ(,<, h;.,. f"-.,..,,,._i.r.s,'aV\ . -fo Con,+ ..... , f-+k w.._ l(J' o..,_ ~,-✓
!rv,,r=--.\..d. µ.__ <lLo _r~;J ~ W4""--kJ ,+a ..c.el( -?k
! r~r.ev+y C\_',d --1-k WM.s fY"e.£.<.l'\C,Q_ S'<>_rvLd -'\J. 'ti')
; "-;J-<-SOV-<2... s.-d.o,,r,J w,"c.-a., ..r<> :J sk ',!/Qv /J ..sqr,,t 4. +~
i w~\L '" M·o o..J . .se".J Mr. 5.,....__ o:,r;•J of'+4... r<U'-\ 1-t,,
'. A-\="-k.v-+4_ iritJ..., / ./.✓ <1 = I(-,,,_. w I'\/ /vfy, J o---e.. .J,41d
i k u,o\.\/j /:/(,,.._ -I,, JA-1{( ~bo,i' ("~.J,'(,0
: h./oCA+;..,c/ .J-k wM'.r '5"'-i,,, · f-~f;-1-/,'.r
. ~J~JJ 1..1 A.f -h 1/owJ; /11,,-., L0 v,,l'l/e, jo,.-.e.,_
1-3 7 c~ .... L,,...,o f.<. D ... :ve..
, f,.... rrJ c z r <'/-63 I .
':'l I o,/ ,,,:,.S-7-3 2 =,_f/
. I
I
f'A7
Memo To:
From:
Subject:
•
March 30, 1988
Jay Bennett
Rose Sidorowicz 1<;As
Drill Crew Assistance
Monitoring Wells
Potter's Pits Site
Maco
Brunswick County
•
This memo is to request the aid of the drill crew at the subject site.
Specifically, the "master locks" on nine monitoring wells need to be
serviced to enable the locking mechanism to open. The locks have
not been opened in four years and will not ·open due to rusting
caused by the elements.
If the locks cannot be opened by working the lock with lubricants,
they will have to · be cut off and replaced with locks that use "2640"
keys.
In addition,
·resulting in
PVC riser.
one of the monitoring wells was run over by a tractor
a bent, metal overshoot and a cracked 2 inch diameter
This well needs to be repaired or properly abandoned.
Please arrange for the materials and personnel needed to service this
site. Your expeditious assistance will be appreciated.
cc: WiRO-GW
•
•
•
•
EPA 04
□
EPA 03
0
EPA 02
0
0
EPA 01
--..:...:::s.:: N
•
•
0
EPA 05
0 EPA 06
C\~~"c::10
·)
I
•
. I
POTTER'S PITS-SITE
MAC □, NC
-DEEP AQUIFER FL □w·
SHALLOW AQUIFER FLOW
0 LPA 8
Q 'c_PA 7
/ I /
I
I ' I I .
I
I ' '
/
·.,
•
·--·· --------------------------------------------------
I ...,,__ s .. -.'5) \. LS AX,t=? \',_LDS ---------. --. -------------
I 'C.-h V l _r:,_,, _\"::\ J:;\.. "L_C:LL:6 L-__ 5:._.'C:\_Cr:c.L 1,.t: s::__1p_ _____ ·--______________ _
u S ""L. l?~1-_ _ _ _____ _ ________________________________ _
."--'C...Crl01i . _\_\/ __ . ----_ -----______ ---____ ----
3 ½\.. S-----9-f S .. )_ °'"'" t" .1-,t'\; \D .. D ___ _s~ _ _::c .. L>-. L_.
A. r L-A.c:tc~-,-_er:-..... _, __ 3_03_i;;._s _________________________________ _
' 1 · ------
----------
----------+!---------
--------------------------------------------------------
------•-+------
....._ ____ -~----+t-----------------------------
-----·------,------------------------------------
----------·++-------·---------------------------------------
----------1-1-----------·--
---.. -----------------------------------
---------------------------,-----
!---------------------------------·---------------
, _____ ----~----------------·---------------------·---------
l 5"s.Lf-4••J
-. '3.0~
,su L ~ c;; l -51, q.<1€~~, "'14
1
-~ I -~
-rD-= G".IO(@rrt'PJ-:;-I;,4<\-:::: \0.66'
rJf . 00(6'17j .f" + ~ ( 7. (;;'d)
' .. = . I G 4 ·i• .C -I-J :
. JC49
1
~7.<\8)J..~
~-<-" d.~o~~~ CA.r,'d
v::::: .ora:J
,_.c_-ooCq,.p+-z....
I ~ ::c \.,_"1\h 1b<;; S-1,J c.,,f \J""'t--
,
'
-i.ot;;
i--+-+--r--t--1~[
10, '"'
7.fio Ii
· Z: PA -z., ::: /. 2.'3 )< C: .Jo(u~J -7. '} '4\/c1111r
--=-...:..:,----:--
( « c...
s-<J :_y_
•
•
,, _____ -·
SWL = t,/~si.is. (./-SZ,'?.5 =-2./5 1
--. ,-,-- ' ·-. ·--1------------------·-----------
-... -rD ;; 65. ?O c~~p) .~ ~5".~4.--.. =. /f)_.2.b'
waJ.w.-Co/..,..,.._.._ = C(, I I ,-,
-6~~ &~--"~l<f>'~,-~t, ___ (), j_]-_§? _{(!J_ _ __
--Clf~ __ ,. ~ ----➔-
i-;"'-l,
Ii 10
..... ,., I· 13 ;.Y ' ,
I '. I]
• - -___ .j_
,
.;... ----------_,_ /· -.
'·
_ _ _ __ _ .~ -__ 1_,_3 fS .g,,11'!"'-S_ _. . _. __ . .
.. _____ 5_{, _::'" ___ ?-~t_ff._~ .. l!<f"-s _ -~ ~ ~C( I
~p --ce-Jc_ -----P~ -----.
26 _ 142 5.St --------------------------------·-------/ r _ _. _1 ~~-_ _ __ !: tt____ __ _ _____ _
If··-___ 13J ____ 1,6}--_
20 .. __ J~t _____ s. G 7 __
-----------------. -------------·--.---------
'
-·, ---------------
. ,,
,
~@~nWiEf
FILE CODE: -C...An....L (cU \2-,,14.t n s
D-S, 5 I r.D C 'i::
XBIL.CA_CO_DU_NH_ONJE
AUG . 28 1987 POTEN~~~t i ~~ir~~s~~~.~tNt I TE
PART I -INFORMATION.ANO ASSESSMENT
I I. SITE NN-IE ANOl;\'!fuli."'i,0ME!l SECT 0
O I SIT\' NA/:1E rn a Ga:6mmil6CJ@Al,l'(lf'Pj'I P.t Ive Potters Pits S1 e ~ name of site) ,g~YSfj~7J, ROUTE NO., OR SPECIFIC LOCATION IDENTIFIER
03 CITY Maco
09 COCRD I NATES: LATITUDE 34°17'04" I LONGITUDE 078°09' 15II
•.10 DIRECTIONS TO SITE <Starting from nearest pub I le road) Take US 74/76 west to the junction of NC 87 and
SR 1419 east of Maco, N.C. continue west on US 74/76 4,000 feet and turn left onto road to Sandy 0:-eek, Acres
Subdivision. Site Is approxlmatety 2,000 feet from 74-76 on either side of the road.
111 RESPONSIBLE PPRTIES
01 OWNER ,11 known) Earl Gurkin
03 CI TY Leland
07 (PERATOR (If known and different from owner)
M-. Albert Elmer Skipper
09 CITY Leland
08 SlREET (Business, mal I Ing, residential)
/Rt. 2, PO Box 445
13 TYPE OF OWNERSHIP <Check one)
lxl A. PRIVATE I I B. FEDERAL: ____________ .:.;<A.sg.:eccnc:c,_yl I I C. STATE
_______________________ CSpecl fyl I IF. OTHER:
JD. COUNTY I E. MUNICIPAL
J G. UNKNOWN
14 OWNER/OPERATOR NOTIFICATION ON FILE (Check al I that apply) CCERCLA 103cl
I l A. RCRA 3001 DATE RECEIVED: I J B. UNCONTROLLED WASTE SITE DATE RECEIVED lxl C. NONE.
IV. CHARACTERIZATION OF POTENTIAL HAZARD
BY (Check all that apply) 01 ON SITE INSPECTION
Ix! YES DATE 9/5/83 I l A. EPA lxl B. EPA CONTRACTOR I IC. STATE I J 0. OTHER CONTRACTOR
l E. LOCAL HEALTH OFFICIAL I l F. OTHER:
I l NO CONTRACTOR NN-E Csl: _ _cN..cU;.:Sc_ ________________ _
02 SITE STATUS (Check onel
I J A. ACTIVE lxl B. INACTIVE I l C. UNKNOWN
03 YEARS OF Cf'ERATION
1969
BEGINNING YEAR
1976 I J UNKNOWN
ENDING YEAR
04 DESCRIPTION OF SUBSTANCES POSSIBLY PRESENT. KNOWN, OR ALLEGED Waste oil, solvent waste, and domestic sewage
were dumped Into shallow, uni ined lagoons, narrow trenches and dtrectly onto the sol I surface. An oi I spl I I from
the pits to Chinnis Branch occurred in 1976 resulting in closure of the pits and cleanup by the U.S. Coast Guard.·
05 DESCRIPTION OF POTENTIAL HAZARD TO ENVIRONMENT ANO/OR PCPULATION Soi I ond groundwater contamination with
oily waste was discovered on site 1983 and EPA ERT conducted an immediate removal on site in March-May 1984 •
Monitoring wel Is were lnstal led to be monltorred by NC DEM. Additional information is available In EPA Reg!On
IV CERCLA files.
V. PRIORITY ASSESSMENT
01 PRIORITY FOR INSPECTION <Check one. If hjgh or medium is checked, ,omplete Parr 2 -Waste Information and Part 5 -Description ot Hazardous <.;ond1t1ons and Inc dents) .
J A. HIGH
(-lnspect1·on required prompt y>
lxl B. MEDIUM I I C. LOW I l O. NONE
< Inspection required) C lnsoect19n gn ll'\"' (No fur1ther octloo needed . . ... . _.-_ ava11ab e ass compete curren-r d1sposft1on form)
VI. INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM
02 PERSON RESPONSIBLE Fffi ASSESSMENT
Pat_:OeRosa
EPA FORM 2070~12 C7-81l
1
05;)\GENCY lffiGANIZATION 103 TELEPHONE NUMBERI08 DATE V
NC DHR _S&H_WM i:ranch. 919-733-2801 7/31/B7 .,,_._ . _
FEET
ACME. N. C.
SW/4 ACME JS' QUADRANGLE
34078-C2-TM-024 ,.J
1984 j
DMA 5352 1 ?W-SE.R1ES v842
3199
,197.
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
512 North Salisbury Street• Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James C. Martin, Governor S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Ms. Susan Fields
Environmental Engineer
Division of Environmental Management
March.26, 1985
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Avenue
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Dear Ms. Fields:
MAR 27 198'
WILMINGTON REGIONI\L OfflC.E
DEM
Reference is made to your letter and report of February 5, 1985 concerning ground-
water monitoring at the Potters Pits Site near Maco, Brunswick county.
In accordance with Mr. Robert F. Helms, Director, Division of Environmental
Management memorandum of May 29, 1984 to Mr. O.W. Strickland, Head, Solid & Hazardous
Waste Management Branch, the Groundwater Section proposes to continue groundwater
monitoring at the site as follows:
(1) Collect water samples from the nine monitor wells in May; 1985 and
analyze the samples for the parameters listed in Attachment 1. Based
on the assumption that the construction of the Gurkin well may be suspect,
we do not feel that samples frcm this 11ell would be repres·entative of
the confined aquifer.
(2) After evaluation of the analytical results from the initial sampling,
select a suite of indicator parameters and wells to be sampled annually
thereafter until such time that the monitoring plan should be modified
or may be terminated.
-If you have any questions concerning this proposal please contact me.
. ,-. ' . ...• ,--....•.. -.. .;... ·· . .,.,·.~--.' .••
... PFN/ cbe
Attachment:
cc: Chuck: Wakild
-~, "'~Terry Dover ..
. -. ··---'"! ,4·.· ;:· • •
. :S.incere l y,
~M 7d~ -
P.e~ Nelson, Chief
-Groundwater Section
. P.O. Box 17687, Raleigh, Nonh C_arolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
~~ Equal-_Opportunity / _Affirmative Action Employer
• •
ATTACHMENT I: Proposed Mo'nitoring Parameters
"Potter's·" Pits Site
Maco, Brunswick County
EPA Wells 1-9
Field Parameters
water level measurement
pH
temperature
specific conductivity volume of water removed from well at the time the well is sampled
appearance
odor
Laboratory Analyses
Indicator Parameters
pH
total dissolved solids
chlorides
iron.
manganese
total kjeldahl nitrogen-N
ammonia-N
.nitrates-N
total phosphorous-P
total organic carbon-C
phenol
Metals
. arsenic
··." barium .,,. - · ·-· .. ,-cadmium
copper .,
· -:. chromium
.lead
-zinc
·-... -~~L _, ·-· ·--
·•·--·: ·a:•·s•-· -Organic Parameters .... __ ._ ,·'.-.. ~:;~%~rtft.if ]~I~j~;;~~;>%~ti1 ;" ;::_~, .... ;:. ~ -.. -----:
· ., .. ·-·:'".;:··"' ;Note: ti•f Ex"tractabfe organfc'• comp'iiurids ''( EOCs) are not found: present in
· ;_ ·:,,~---·· •·""-',initial -samples,' then .the. EOA will be discontinued.. ·
.. ·:_:_~·. --:. ':·. '. ;-,.~~-\:"-.,.•-.:::·:~~: ._. -... -~-. ;:;;~;.;,;:... .• ,;-~·-... ·: '._ ~ --~:.:•i;~ ·. :~·--< _, •
~~;~~--",j'!.--::~::..."'_. ---.. ; . .. ~ : . _....,..
~,~,,_,,~~:::_::;.:;_:._.t·•:-;.,,...
,--::···-· .. ··-~---~-·-. ---the -~-. __ --·-
• . h~an
·-, ....
' Table II: GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL DATA
LJL .J-'\ p \.,_JL
, WELL# CASING HGT. WELL DEPTH WATER DEPTH AB #BAILS ELEV. ( "'i._1.,s:;:v ~\S:.Y -:' . ' .. I
EPA 7 11 911 ' 17' O" 8' 10" g• 2" 50 92.9 u ·G,0,4-51·. G REMARKS -NO ODOR IN WELL --
L EPA 8 l 1 911 30'0" 12'6" 12'6" 60 89.0 Go.2 47,7
REMARKS -NO ODOR IN WELL I '
'
u . , EPA 9 l' 11" 10'10" 7 I l 11 ORY 9 -85.2 51.0 4:-.3'.9
REMARKS -WELL HAD SOLVENT/HYDROGEN SULFIDE ODOR
v,. EPA 6 1' 10" 11 '9." 51 811 61811 30 84.8 4-9,2 4'3.5
REMARKS -SEPTAGE SMELL
U, EPA 1 l' 11" 11 '7" 71011 7 I 511 20 91. 7 57, 4-so'4
Rl'MARKS -NO ODOR IN WELL
Vv EPA 2 2' 111 10' 3" 31711 DRY 20 89.3 '5 l. <o 48.0
REMARKS -STRONG PETROLEUM/H2S ODOR. WELL RECHARGED QUICKLY
u, EPA 5 l 1 811 10' 5" 41 O" ORY 20 86.2 48.9 44,9
REMARKS -VERY STRONG H2S ODOR
EPA 3 2' 211 10' O" 2' 711 31311 37 86.8 48-1 4 ,-t;
U> . :, . ..,,
REMARKS -SLIGHT PETROLEUM ODOR .. ' ' .,
' 45.';: EPA 4 . 3' 10" 27' O" ,'.;# 1 I 711 . N/A N/A 86.5 4~-8 L
REMARKS -ARTESIAN. FLOW IN~ q '" ·2 GPM. NO ODOR IN WELL
"' . .., -,
L GURKIN 21411 25'0" 11' 6" 11 '8" 60 87.4 ' 4E,.\ 57,~
REMARKS -NO ODOR IN WELL
CC,_ -J-:) J OS
FIRE .11" 91 811 41 011 ORY 30 97.6
REMARKS -NO ODOR IN WELL. RECHARGED VERY RAPIDLY
C.H1nr,1'S,· {J n... ,s A,-An "i::I.....C:YAT\0 r, 01=' 4 '2." l:CT
I
-.. --
L '\: Cr"L 17 0 ·,
U -~U~l='t,S:.,\A L. AQI..JI Ft:r::L. ....
'--::r-c ~ ," I A I,.... y
':>Aho AQU\-0,'SSU.r\1'.:
" ...r\f'..CO 2
,,
I 5 1-1-114-,<...,,JI-\ I <1 t-1 .,
I="[.~ HAS_/',n
..-r"'\ P ._ 1..0 L "Ll.....'i:'-/ • IS
I r"I t==" '[ 'C T A t:3 0 '\,I 'L,. .:.17. S L. .
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Developrnent
512 North Salisbury Street O Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James C. Martin, Governor
Ms. Teresa Sandora
TechLaw, Inc.
12011 Lee Jackson
Fairfax, Virginia
Dear Ms. Sandora:
Highway
22033
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 12, 1985
Subject: Response to your letter
dated March 4, 1985
Potter's DIT/Skipper Estate/
Gurkin's Site
Maco -Brunswick County
Enclosed are copies of all the documents in my ''Gurkin's Site''
file, except for several EPA reports which I am sure you already have
in your possession.
It is hoped that this data will help you.
Sincerely,
Rick Shiver
Regional Hydrologist
RS/sbm
cc: Lee Laymon
Terry Dover
Enclosure
7225 Wrightsville Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403
:llla:&l:Jrni!WJiZlili!ijiK.~~~~XXl<l.),ll.~~WAAl4X
Telephone [phone]
~:l:QO>l~~~oem!iNl>&o~
• Techlaw, Inc.
FEDERAL EXPRESS
• ·12011 Lee Jackson Highway
Suite 503
Fairfax, Virginia 22033
703/352,4516
March 4, 1985 -1~
MAR 5 1985
Mr. Harry Nelson
Chief Groundwater Section
Department of Natural Resources
P.O. Box 2768
. WR "I l9SS GROUND '.'!ATER SECTl~f,J
DEG\Ott"\. Off\C( '.:A LEIGH, r!. !'~ '
Raleigh, NC 27611 W\l.MlNGTOtt " OEM Dear Mr. Nelson:
We are writing to request your approval to receive copies of
Department of Natural Resources records related to Potter's Pit
(Skipper Estate) hazardous waste site in Maco, North Carolina.
TechLaw, Inc. is presently under contract with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to perform certain
research on the Potter's Pits (Skipper Estate) site. In our
search for records relevant to Potter's Pit, Teresa Sandoro, of
our staff, spoke with Mr. Rich Shiver of your Wilmington office.
_She was informed by him that he had a file relevant to the site
which could be copied and forwarded to our office, upon your
approval.
Individuals within EPA who could verify TechLaw's
relationship with EPA include:
Richard Green
Investigations and Compliance Section
EPA Region 4
[phone]
-0 '2.cr30
Larry Werner
Office of Waste Programs Enforcement
EPA Region 4
[phone]
Giezelle Bennette
Waste Management Division
EPA Region 4
[phone]
Your cooperation in this manner greatly appreciated. Please
let me know if you have any questions.
KV/jmw
Fairfax, Virginia • Lakewood, Colorado
. ,
Ms. Susan M. Fields
Environmental Engineer
•
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
•
DRAFlf
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMEITTAL MAIJAGEMENT
March 1, 1935
Subject: Proposed Groundwater Monitoring Plan
"Potter's" Pits Site
Maco
Bruns~li ck County
Dear Ms. Fields:
This is in response to your letter dated 5 February 1985, and constitutes
the Division's proposal to continue groundwater monitoring at the subject
site.
The specifics of this proposal are listed as follows:
1. The ten monitoring wells will be sampled once yearly (during
May of each year);
2. Attachment I shows what data and samples will be collected from
each well;
3. At the end of four years this analytical data will be evaluated
to determine if the monitoring project should continue or can be
terminated.
If you have questions about this proposal, please do not hesitate to
call Lee Laymon at [phone],
PEN/RS/sf
Attachment
cc: Paul Wilm
Chuck Wakil d
Terry Dover
Central Files
Sincerely,
Perry F. Nelson, Chief
Groundwater Section
• •
ATTACHMENT I: Proposed Monitoring Parameters
''Potter's'' Pits Site
Maco, Brunswick County
EPA Wells 1-9 and Gurkin's Well:
Field Parameters
water level measurement
pH
temperature
specific conductivity
DRAflf
volume of ~1ater removed from ~1ell at the time the 1~ell is sar1pled appearance
odor
Laboratory Analyses
Indicator Parameters
pH
total dissolved solids
chlorides
iron
manganese
total kjeldahl n1trogen-N
ammonia-N
nitrates-N
total phosphorous-P
total organic carbon-C
phenol
Metals
arsenic
barium
cadmium
copper
chromium
1 ead
zinc
Organic Parameters
VOA
EOA
Note: if ~xtractable organic compounds (EOCs) are not found present in the
initial samples, then the EOA will be discontinued.
• • UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENcvRECt:I \7~FJ)
REGION IV
Robert F. Helms, Director
Division of .Environmental
Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Helms:
345COURTLANDSTREET
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30365
February S, 1985
FEB I I 1985
Enclosed is the rei;x:,rt concerning the first round of groundwater samples
fran the petter's Pits Site in Mace, NC, since the Superfund cleanup action.
Please contact me at [phone] to discuss a groundwater rronitoring
plan for this site. Thank-you for your attention in this matter.
sincerely,
~//11~~
Susan M. Fields
Environmental Engineer
cc: Terry oover, North Carolina Department of Human Resources
FEB 21 1985
WILMINGTON REGIOKAL Off\CE
DEM
• •
POTTER'S PITS SITE MACO, NORTH CAROLINA
On May 23-24, 1984 the monitoring wells installed on the Potter's Pits Site were. surveyed and sampled by the Environmental Response Team (ERT). The survey was conducted to' specifically locate the wells, and determine the relative water . surface elevations. Samples were collected from the wells to initiate the ground-water monitoring program.
Survey
The su~vey of the monitoring well array was conducted using a theodolite and rapid electronic distance measuring system. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Benchmark "MACO 2" served as the survey reference. The absolute elevation of this marker was not acquired from USGS, but for purposes of this survey, it was assigned an elevation of 100.0. All monitoring wells were surveyed to the top of the well casing, as well as the ground surface adjacent to the well casing. In addition to the monitoring wells installed by EPA, both the shallow fire tower well, and the Gurkin Well.were included in the survey.
Survey·data was used to calculate the relative elevations of the groundwater surface in each of the monitoring wells, which in turn was used to develop the Groundwater Contour Map (see Figure 1). A discussion of the groundwater map is · presented later in this report.
Well Sampling
Samples were collected from each of the wells surveyed. These samples were analyzed for the volatile priority pollutants. Prior to sampling the wells were hand-bailed to remove approximately three well volumes. In several cases, the well was exhausted before the appropriate volume of groundwater could be removed. In these cases the well was allowed to recover and then samples were collected.
Samples were collected using a bottom-filling stainless steel bailer. The samples were collected into 40 ml VOA bottles, packed in ice, and shipped to New Jersey for analyses. Sampling techn.iques followed EPA protocol and guide-.lines. Analytical data are presented in Table 1.
Groundwater Map
Preliminary information from well boring logs and excavation during removal actions revealed the presence of a shallow, and apparently continuous clay layer beneath the bottom of the former waste pits. This relatively impermeable clay layer has resulted in the formation of a perched water table above the lower aquifer. The lower aquifer is tapped by local residents as a potable water supply with wells which generally penetrate to the sandstone bedrock lying ap-proximately 30 feet below grade.
''
• • -2-
Information from sampling of monitoring wells and existing wells in the
vicinity of Potter's Pits provide preliminary information on the contaminant
hydrogeology at the site. The attached map (Figure 1) and chart of monitoring
well data (Table 1) display the results of ERT's initial sampling efforts. These
.results provide some insight into the characteristics of the perched water table
and the lower aquifer beneath the Potter's Pits site •
. Initial sampling confirms the presence of a low yielding, perched aquifer
which was tapped by monitoring wells screened in the 5 to 17-foot range below
the ground's surface. These wells, designated on the map by a circle containing
"S", recharged very slowly and in the case of wells 9, 2, and 5 could be bailed.
dry with a small hand bailer. The total volume of water in the perched aquifer,
therefore, appears to be small, and is probably very dependent on recharge from
rainfall over a limited area. The general flow direction of the perched water
table at the time of sampling was to the southeast.
"0" wells 4, 8 and the Gurkin Well, shown on the map as squares containing
a cross, are screened in the higher yielding aquifer present above the surface
of the sandstone bedrock 25.to 30 feet below grade. Measurements from these
wells indicate that this aquifer flows to the northeast and recharges rapidly.
Well EPA #4.was artesian, yielding roughly 2 gallons/minute. This indicates
the integrity of the clay layer separating the lower and upper aquifers, and
also suggests that there may be an upward component of flow from lower aquifer
into portions of the perched water table. This flow component would minimize
the transfer of pollutants from the perched water table into the lower aquifer.
However, cones of depression around active residential wells in the lower aquifer
may cause transport of contaminants from the upper to the lower aquifer.
CONCLUSIONS
· As a result of the field investigations, sampling, and analytical data
concerning the Potter's Pits site, the following conclusions can be drawn:
1. The deep aquifer flows in generally a north/northeasterly direction.
2. The shallow aquifer is perched on a clay layer, and flows generally
in a east/southeasterly direction. Due to the nature of the shallow
strata, this flow may not be consistent. Depending on the amount and
rate of recharge, flow exiting the shallow zone may be in several
directions.
3. The shallow aquifer is contaminated with various organic chemicals.
The majority of these chemicals indicate gasoline/waste petroleum
to be the source material. The presence of benzene, ethylbenzene,
toluene, and xylenes are indicative of volatile gasoline fractions.
The contaminants are present in the PPM range. The distribution
and magnitude of contamination is consistent with the source load
area and groundwater flow in the shallow. aquifer.
r . • •
4. The deep aquifer has not been affected by the contamination in the
shallow zone. Neither the upgradient or downgradient deep wells con-
tained detectable volatile organics (10 PPB DL). The Gurkin Well was
also free from organics, consistent with the other deep aquifer
samples '(see Discussion).
DISCUSSION
The presence of purgable organic contaminants in the shallow aquifer at the
Potter's Pits site was anticipated, and confirmed by the groundwater investigation.
The more important questions concerned the deep aquifer, and from the data
developed during the initial groundwater sampling, it appears that the deep aquifer
has not suffered measurable contamination. Due to the long period of that time
that the source contaminant load was present, the absence of impact on the deep
aquifer is attributed to the integrity of the confining clay layer which separates
the shal·low and deep zones.
The Gurkin Well sample did not contain measurable contaminants, consistent
with other samples drawn from the deep aquifer. It is probable that the organic
chemicals previously detected in water from this well were present due to leakage
from the shallow zone. The annular space of the Gurkin Well may have provided
a conduit for transport of highly contaminated water from the shallow zone into
the deep aquifer. This effect would have been local, and would explain the
presence of volatile organics in the Gurkin Well. Also, the well was in regular
use at the time of the original sampling, and the micro-gradient caused by
consistent pumping may have increased the transport of contaminants from the
shallow zone. Subsequent sampling of the Gurkin Well took place after it had
been unused for several months. The presence of volatil~ organics in pre-
excavation Gurkin Well samples, therefore, would not have been indicative of
gross contamination of the deep aquifer, but rather document the effect of
breaching the confining clay layer under the waste-disposal area.· •
Data from a shallow well installed by the State approximately 20 feet north-
west of the Gurkin Well support this hypothesis. This well was approximately
12 feet deep, and samples drawn from it would have been from the shallow zone,
in the highly contaminated saturated layer. These data indicate very high levels
of volatile organics, much higher than the original Gurkin Well samples. It
appears that the State well data represent the source material, and the Gurkin
Well data demonstrates the effect of leakage of this source material through the
confining layer. Unfortunately, the State well was destroyed during the ex-
cavation.
Apparently, either due to removal of the highly contaminated source material,
absence of drawdown, or the disturbance of the soils around the casing of the
Gurkin Well, the influence between the shallow and deep aquifers has been inter-
rupted or terminated. Additional sampling should indicate. the stability of this
effect. ·
• • -4-
This objective of the excavation project was to remove the bulk of the
source material thereby reducing the time required for the shallow zone to purge
contaminants. and recover. The initial data set indicate that volatile organics
are being transported from the shallow zone. This condition is expected to per-
sist· for an extended period of time, but eventually the contaminants which are
in the shallow zone will be depleted. Due to the removal of the bulk of the
concentrated source material via excavation, the time required to purge the
shallow zone, while indefinite, will be significantly less than had the source
material remained in place.
Periodic monitoring of the wells installed on the site should indicate the
general rate of the shallow zone purge, and also indicate any impacts on the
deep aquifer.
Table 1. RESULTS OF VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS FROM WELL
SAMPLES COLLECTED AT THE POTTER'S PITS SITE
LOCATION BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TOTAL VOA
EPA 1 ND 70 90 *650 *1000
EPA 2 3000 3000 1000 4000 20000
EPA 3 500 40 BMDL *200 1700
EPA 4 ND ND ND ND <10
EPA 5 10000 35000 2500 23000 70000
EPA 6 140 10 30 *30 *400
EPA 7 ND BMDL ND ND <10
EPA 8 ND BMJL ND ND <10
EPA 9 ND ND ND ND *200
GURKIN ON ND ND NO <10
FIRE TOWER ND ND ND ND *50
ALL DATA REPORTED IN PPB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
* = APPROXIMATE VALUE
Bt1lL = BELOW METHOD DETECTION LIMIT
ND = NOT DETECTED
. ·.-r.
' \
\ ....
• •
Table II: GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL DATA
WELL# CASING HGT. WELL DEPTH WATER DEPTH AB #BAILS ELEV. . ,,
EPA 7 11 911 17' O" 8' 10" 91 2" 50 92.9
REMARKS -NO ODOR IN WELL
EPA 8 11 911 30'0" 12' 6" 12' 6" 60 89.0
REMARKS -NO ODOR IN WELL
/ EPA 9 1' 11" 10' 10" 7 I 1 II DRY 9 85.2
REMARKS -WELL HAD SOLVENT/HYDROGEN SULFIDE ODOR
EPA 6 1' 10" 11 '9." 51311 61 811 30 84.8
REMARKS -SEPTAGE SMELL
EPA 1 1' 11" 11 '7" 71 011 71511 20 91. 7
REMARKS -NO ODOR IN WELL 0
,.,. EPA 2 2' l 11 · 10' 3" 3' 711 DRY 20 89.3
REMARKS -STRONG PETROLEUM/H2S ODOR. WELL RECHARGED QUICKLY
.. EPA 5 l 1 811 10' 5" 4 1011 DRY 20 86.2
REMARKS -VERY STRONG H2S ODOR
EPA 3 2' 211 10'0" 2' 711 31311 37 86.8
REMARKS -SL! GHT PETROLEUM OOOR
; >,..
EPA 4 -3' 10" 27' O" l' 711 N/A N/A 86.5
REMARKS -ARTESIAN, FLOWING AT '" ,, ·2 GPM. NO ODOR IN WELL
GURKIN 2' 4" 25'0" 11' 6" 11'8" 60 87.4
REMARKS -NO ODOR IN WELL
FIRE .11" 91311 4' 011 DRY 30 97.6
REMARKS -NO ODOR IN WELL. RECHARGED VERY RAPIDLY
EPA 04
□
EPA 03
0
EPA 02
0
N
EPA 05
0 EPA 06
0
POTTER'S PITS SITE
MACO, NC
Q -SHALL□'w' 'w'ELL
□ -DEEP 'w'ELL
-DEEP AQUIFER FLOW
-SHALLOW AQUIFER FLOW
---.....:::::s;
EPA 04
□
EPA 03
0
0
PA 01
N
\JELL
/1
05 / EPA 86 POTTER'S PITS SITE
MACO, NC
EPA 09
0 Q -SHALL□\./ \./ELL
□ -DEEP \JELL
--DEEP AQUIFER FLDV
SHALLDV AQUIFER . FLDV
•
' '
'
!
fl DRAIT
NURTII CAROL INA DEPARl'MENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Lithologic Log Quad ·No. C.C -:}7; o
Serial No. ______ _
Log by: Q.,I( 1,;; 5H1\.J,_Q Date S:-29-84 County no, 10S~,..JIC.K..
Owner 'fAU.L Cd,QIL1nS Driller A.(, POP-10CcS Date Drilled 05-?5>84
Depth _____ ft.: DiB.m. in.: Cased to ft.: Elev. ft. above MSL ---------· ------
Cuttings __ _,,_ _____ '-'Elec. Log, ___ i...,"'-'--------Ganuna Log, ___ ~n"-'-""'-------
Type Log: Drillers, M_icroscopic, Macroscopic (circle one)
Description Depth (feet Thickness Drg. Tim,
from to (feetl (min.) .. c::; ..... .--n ....... ..r\ f J r-,, __, ...-..-1-,-, ., ~ ,,nnt.,n " I P ,c;-r ..
A~~ l""\Q. A r,r. ~
" ,~ ·--r--. n, A (_ '/ A --r.-r--. ,.. Y -. " I ,
! l.,--,l.n'"\" -c,n,,,.,n,o \. I 'f" r'\ ........-'
(. .... 1 -r: \ I c,,r-. n ·.-..,-r:, '°"'' \ n. ....._-nl .--l/ -
l A r:, c --' n1 ... , ...r-\ 1 n A,-.,-......
( ~ / \ I L.1 ~ Lt 1n(·-, ""? .. .:;: ..... --r-, (' n A..,.. Ann-n, A <' IL "" \ r,
! ..r\ ~ n., r ,-( _ ...... A\ \7.) f""-L.''TLI -
-c; n ·.., ·,-, n C::.,.t1nA.,,rrut An ' i cnn·,-A ,--, nA .-.,-n 1 • J , T-' t--1 ! I 5, c • .-.. C rl_ -, ' '
' I'< ""Ann 1L-r -· r,..n,..,. --· co-~c::.-I°< f 1:;
-· 'r.!"n '"I,-,. r ("'\ ' l ') l I <;,....., o r,n ,
~' ,n -n n( l fl n, r,,,, ;
~ .:::,Ar'\ C. Ir c·,-n A,.-CnAr:t~'\'"·-'0. ? (""\
' -r..-Q.6.\\l}n , l..,. l I -<s 00.T'tD
C.,(, ...... · n ,.....l , n .-..,-r,
" t='C\ <; <; I LI ,:::C 'l Qr'\< l <; ">An n <-o ,...·_. '.-' ... n< ··-. ..-... .-.., J fJ, I -
' ,..... .... n c;,c;--c~n A, n,n r-Al,--,
C.r'ICLT\t,r <,c1\, r.:, C'IL, n n, I')
' rl'5"' I .._, (._'-T' nn ri A I ~l-:l.A<"-.r'\'° 111~
' C 0-C1F>r'l r,
C;"w-2 Rev~.seC. !Ol:_/80
• DRATT NURTII CAROLINA I>EPAH'l'MENr OF NATURAL RESUUHCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEl'j'f
D l V LS ION OF ENVIRON MENTAL MANAGEMENT
Lithologic Log Quad No. cc -:3:::) O -' Serial No. ______ _
Log by: 12,c IL Date~ ?Q 84 County no.,1nc:::,c.J1cu:..
Lo cat ion, Town._-"~'-'-=-,.._,.'-____ c_ _________ Lat . _____ Long. _____ _
Owner r A p.. L Cc< 111.. ~ 1 ,, S Driller A. c. non.., n C""c5 Date Drilled ._--? .,-_ 84-
I>epth ft.: ------Diam. in.: ------Cased to _____ .ft.: Elev. ____ ._ft. above MSL
Cutt ings ___ _,v''-------~E l ec. Log, ____ ,_._,_,c_ ______ Canuna Log, ____ Ln.1..1..L _____ _
Type Log: Drillers, Microscopic, Macroscopic (circle one)
l---'"1'"Q,--.LC)(,-Y e,--;:_oL.OCr y
Description Deoth (feet ~Pl;,.k~-,~ ~· from to ~ f eefj---_ .
.-c;. .A. n ,--,._... __,_,,n ,__,_,., n-, ", r, r>. Q·C'.\ l cl n 0 2 ~,,rn~
Ann no_ An,>,
,r .4i.•,./\<i' ·" <; AO""'> :,
• :')An r--. Ll<,-HT C,-Q.6...__, C \ .-....:, A I<\ \J•1cr-1nr-,n,n
, ... r-. A, n '> n '3<;'n_._,., t.lC:, Lt
-sno.T, o "'it.. ,nA nc""-( IL An ' ' ; ""' ACC)',c;nn _,-, I r"'I -,-1lA l. C::::: ~
.. -i~ 'r"l..l \ r") r-,, ..... [ \/ ,-. I ._-C Mnl-1 ,......., h I nC: ' ... _.r'\ ( ) f") ("-r"'l A.-r ,o. ,.,,...., .-"\.Al'C. n...1 AL-... 1 C::,'"-:.6. \-, r-, '&r.:l..L'\.._,. r,,....._,.-..~5' -; .,,. ,-:, c-I -') -I c.--' .
" f"-·Q_ A 1 r,', n' (.__. 1°1 l' __ I ,<,"' D. ~r-r.. \::=\---Jr"> .
,""-,.,,n......_n,_1(tnrr,. '
' '
' ;
'
GW-2 Revised 10/l/80
-----------------·------F)o 11 c ,-_:, i':·,·c; '.::ii,·r., iV\,\co J I\Jl.
C, AOUNDWArr: R .F1..ow C or,1rou FL,
-;
MAY 2.3, ll\8''i
· ~ L_,,owch /\Qv1F[R © Prcf1c.1-\ED \NA,ER ·
,-... --,.,_,,.WE.1\s ~-c.o .. novlls ~ 'v\lE.1\s .J-Cor<TouR3
V Ru/\11vi:W/\Tr:R Elev.-'<' 5..:.ALE.' 1",,50'
. . EPAc1r-4
. 1-·· ""r'""'12."'•''~._.. ~ [l] 805" (/\ri-;_s'.(IN) • *USGS M11nk£R-M/\C_o''2. c.ALLEL 100.0' ·
f PA1t3
©
8~~---·,
EPAff:L· . ' ~ "',/ (%) "-. 91.7 . ·,
v
71 I I
"'•f·
•
..
• . < rP·t'IW•l• · ~--J· . .i .. ;>'J,IOOfi·
\ 1J// '
--..,
' '-
.,
"-,
"' ' /J'[)
'-.,_
' '---.
. --' ',. -·, . ...
'
I
z -·
I
/
///
,I /,,_,. •.
I ' '
;
i
I I
\
\
\
\
I I
' I I
I
I·-. I -
I ! ' '
•
•
__,.-,AP 'SH0C....Vlr'IC-11-\'C t:,\5,\--,_\C3CJ1\Or.. O~ 1\--\'C
.r,.A C..O I
O l> ~ r,..._ '--( '"2--:) , ""2.. 4 , l C\ '2.i 4 , & u \-;,.._ ~ 1 \---s s \ T"'C-, '
B \-:,.__U l, s L,J \ c_ \L_ c__ou \,T '--(
Ef::iA 0,1 -
□ ">10 ----EPA 03
0 740
EPA 02
0 I I 000
N
I
I
210 -
•
-----
-----
EPA 05
0
70500
---.....,.___
EPA 06
2/0 0
0
> 10 ·
>to
•
DRAfl
POTTER'S PITS. SITE
"' MACO, NC -·---~
'""
·---
□ L PA 8
0 <;'_P/'\ /"',,
rt::
.I
J
I I
I
I • (
•
•
..
•
• • UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV MAY
May 2, 1984
0. W. Strickland, Head
34~ COURTLAND STREET
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30365
Solid & Hazardous Waste Managerrent Branch
Environrrental Health Section
Division of Health Services
306 N. Wilmington St.
P.O. Box 2091
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Dear Mr. Strickland:
Under the Superfund program, the U.S. EPA has recently coopleted an imrediate
rerroval project at lots #84 and #85 in Sandy Creek Acres in Brunswick County
near Maco, North C.arolina. 1770 tons of oily sludges and contaminated soils
were excavated and transported to the hazardous waste landfill in Pinewood,
S.C.. Contaminated groundwater persists onsite, and nine rronitoring wells
will be placed by EPA around the site in an effort to detect migration of the
contaminants. EPA will perform initial sarrpling and analysis to develop a
baseline.
This letter is to request that the appropriate state agency of North Carolina
assurre the responsibility of sarrpling & analysis of these m:,nitoring wells at
regular intervals. A proposed groundwater m:,nitoring plan is attached which
provides m:,re details. The wells will be installed and sarrpled the week of
May 14, 1984. Sample analysis will be available shortly thereafter. If you.
have any questions concerning this IPatter, feel free to contact rre at (404)
881-3931.
Sincerely,
_5,~,,, 11J1'1t,l:t
Susan M. Fields
Environrrental Engineer
Attachrrents
_ ... ""' "• lllll4
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
DEM
' • •
ONCE THF. WELLS A.t,E INSTALLE'.f) AQUIFF.R DATA CAN P.E DEVELDPE:D 1D VERIFY THE
GROUNIYl'JATER DIRF:CTIO:, AND VF.LCX:ITY. IF THE.SF. . DATA INDICATE A GROUNDWATF:R FLOW
DIRECTION SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFEREl\'T FROM THE ASSUM!.='TION STATF.D, ADDITIONAL
WELLS MAY HAVE TO BE INSTALLED 1D PRCVIDE: ADEQUATE GROUND,JATER MONI1DRING.
AFrE:R DEVELOPMF:NT OF THE NP.W \·lELLS, THE: WE:LL ARRAY INCLUI)P,D IN THE
~10NITORING SCHEMF: ( SP.E TABLE 1 ) SHOULD BE SAMPLED. THIS SA"lPLING PRCGRl\M
SHOULD P.E REPc:ATF.D MONTHLY FOR A SIX MONTH PERIOD, AND THEN CONTINUED ON YEARLY
Il\'TERVALS.
A"1ALYTICAL PARAMETERS FOR THE. MONITORING PRCGRAM SHOULD BE TilE VOLATILP.
ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS. THESE PARAME:TERS ARE SUGGESTED 1D MONI1DR THE
VARIOUS SOLVENTS CURRENTLY CONTAMINATING THE GROUNUr/ATER. AFTr'.R A SUFFICIE:t\'T
DATABASE HAS BEEN IBVELOPED, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE 1D MONITOR FOR A FEW INDICA1DR
CONTAMINANTS, THERE!W REDUCING ANALYTICAL COSTS.
WELL CONSTRUCTION
SHALLOW \·JELLS -( ABOVE CLAY CONFINING LAYER, IF PRESENT )
COMPLETED TO 10-15 FEET.
GALVANIZED SCREEN (APPROX. 7 FT.)
SCREENED APPROX. 2' AROVE WATER TAF\LE
GRAVEL PACK APPROX. 2' ABOVE SCRP.P.N
GROUT 1D SURFACP. W/ CE:MENT.
Sf.CURI TY \'/ELL CAP W/ I.DCKING LID.
DEEP WELLS -( BELO\•/ CONFINING Ll\YER, IF PRF.SEl\'T )
COMPLETED TO 25-35 FEET.
GALVANIZF:D SCREEN FROM SILT TRl\P TO CLAY Ll\YER.
GRAVEL PACK TU CLAY Ll\"'ER.
BP.NTONITE TD 2 '· INTO lJ1,CONFINED AQUIFER.
GROUT TD SURFACE W/ CEMENT.
SECURITY \'JELL CAP W/ I.DCKING LID.
I 2)
• •
POTTERS PITS SITE
TABLE 1
GROUNCWATf.R MONITORING -WELL ARRAY
* 1 . FIRE TIMER WFLL -BACKGROUND CONTROL
* 2. GRANGER WELL -UPGRADIENT POSITION. ( DEEP WELL-60 FEET)
* 3. GURKIN WELL -SOURCE POSITION ( IN PIT#]-25 FEET)
* 4 RABSON WELL -IXJWNGRADIENT TO THE NORTHWEST.
5. EPA] -!XJilNGRl\DIENT TO NORTHWEST. ( SHALI1M)
6. EPA2 -IXlWNGRADI ENT NORTH OF PIT * 1 • ( SHALWv)
7. F.PA3 -IXlWNGR'IDIE:NT NORTHF'.J\ST OF PIT #1.(SHALLCW)
8. EPA4 -ADJACENT TO EPA3, DEfP ( 30 FEET )
9. EPA5 -COWNGRADIENT TO FAST OF PIT #1. (SHALI.ru)
10. EPA6 -UPGRADIENT TO·SOIJHlF.AST OF PIT #1.(SHALLCld)
11. EPA? -UPGRADIENT TO SOUTHWEST OF PIT #1. SHALW\-1 WELL
COf\ITROL.
12. EPAS -ADJACENT TO EPA 7. DEEP IJE:LL CONTROL.
13. EPA9 -SOUTHEAST OF PIT #2. (SHALLCNl)
* F.XISTING WELLS
( 3 I
PP·LIW-2
: ri'S PITS SITE
~J.C.
t
0
,,,,,------
□
-. . ·------
\
I I \
GURKl(I RESIDE/JC~----\
------... -\ r •~-~• ,
,' p, r "1. /
' _CD ____ '--_
pp-N· 11./
@ GAINGEn RESIDE Cf
ElPP·P\.1·2\/
@
EPft 1
flnf WATCII TOWER
CJ
NOT TO SCALE
------~ l<EY:____
@ GRos,_,,...,~1--c.<..
r)/o,v ,T.,it.1 >Jj L.Jc..f(--'
FIGUnE 1
• •
POTTERS PITS SITE
TABLE 1
GROUNINlATER MONITORING -WELL ARRAY
* 1. FIR8 TOWER WELL -BACKGROUND CONTROL
* 2. GRANGER WELL -UPGRADIENT POSITION (DEEP WELL-60 FEET)
* 3. GURKIN WELL -SOURCE POSITION ( IN PIT #1-25 FEET)
* 4 RABSCN \'JELL -CG/NGRADIENT TO THE NORTHWEST.
5. F.PAl -IDvNGR/\DIENT TO NORTHWF.ST. (SHALLOW)
6. EPA2 -IXMNGRADIENT NORTH OF PIT #1. (SHALI.Od)
7. F.PA3 -COWNGRADIFNT NORIBEAST OF PIT #1. (SHALLO,v)
8. EPA4 -ADJACENT TO EPA3, DF.FP ( 30 FEET )
9. EPAS -!Xlv/NGRADIENT TO FAST OF PIT #1. (SHALLOW)
10. EPA6 -UPGRADIENT TO· SCUTHFAST OF PIT #1. (SHALL(),,7)
11. F.PA7 -UPGRADIENT TO SOUTHvJEST OF PIT #1. SHALWW WELL
CONTROL.
12. F.PAS -ADJACENT TO EPA7. DEEP HF.LL CONTROL.
13. EPA9 -SOUTHEAST OF PIT # 2. ( SHALL(),,))
* = EXISTING WELLS
( 3}
-· • •
'ID SUE PIELDS, FO REGION IV EPA
fROM R.W. CIBUI.SKIS, Et-NIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST, ERT
RE GROUNCWATER MONI'IDRING AT THE PO'ITERS PITS SITE -MACO, N.C.
FOITERS PITS SITE
GROUNIWATER MONI'IDRING
CONTAMINATION OF THE SHALT.a-I AQ'JIFER HAS BEEN IXX:UMENTED AT T1-lE PO'ITERS PITS SITE RY T1-lE PRESENCE OF PHENOL AND VARIOUS SOLVENTS IN THE DRINKit-.'G WATER TAKEN FRC\'1 BOTH A RESIDENTIAL AND A MONI'IDRit-.'G WELL ONSITE. THE SOILS BEING F.XCAVATPD FROM THE SITE ARE GROSSLY CONTAMINATED WITH BLACK OILY SLUDGE, AND THE SANDY SOIL.S RE1J:M THE EXCAVATED PIT APPFAR 'ID CONTAIN GASOLINE/SOLVENT CONTN•1INATION. THE AQUIF'ER SURFACE IS AT APPROXIMATELY 8 FEET, AND 11,E SOILS 'ARE A FINE SAND-SANDY CLAY. IXJE 'ID THESE FACIDRS, GROUND.-/ATER COITTAMINATION IS PROBABLY EXTENSIVE, AND MONITORING IS ESSENTIAL TD DETERMINE THE EXTENT TD WHICH THE AQUIFER HAS REEN AFFECTED.
AT PRESENT, THERE ARE NO SITE SPECIFIC DATA TD INDICATE THE FIDW DIRECTION OF THE SHALLOW AQUIPER, NOR IBE VEIDCITY OF GROUNDWATF.R MOVEMENT. OBSERVATICN OP THE: 'IDPO:;RAPHY AND SURFACE FEATURES IN THF. GENERAL VICINITY OF THE SITE INDICATE THAT GROUNDWATER PROBABLY FIDI-JS IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ACROSS THE SITE. THE PRESENCE OF A SWAMPY AREA AND STREAM_ 'ID THE NORTH/NORTHF.11.ST OF THE SITE, WITH TDPCGRll.PHY SI.DPING TOWARDS T1-lIS AREA, TEND 'ID SUPFORT THE HYFQTHESIS OF A NORTHFASTERLY GROUNIJ.·JATF:R MOVEMENT.
IBERE !'\RE FOUR EXISTING WELLS IN Tr!E VICINITY OF THE SITE. ASSUMING THE GROUNU/ATER FLDW IS IN A NORTHF}\STERLY DIRECTION, ONE OF THESE \\'ELLS ( GRANGF.:R RF.:SIDENCE ) IS LOCATf.D UffiRADIEt-.'T, AND IS FREE OF CONTAMINANTS. THIS WF:LL, HO.-IEVF:R, DRll.WS GROUNIJ."1\TER FROM APPROXUlATELY 60 FF.:ET. THE GURKINS h'ELL rs LOCATED THROUGH ONE OF THE PITS TD ABOUT 25 FEIT, AND IS CONTA'1INATED. ANOTHER WELL IS LOCATED DIRECTLY ADJACENT TD IBF. GURKINS PROPERTY, APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET TO THE NORTHl·IEST. THIS v/ELL ( M\•/1 ) IS COMPLETF.D TO 10-12 FEET, AND WAS REFl)RTED TO BE HIGHLY CONTAMINATED PRIOR 'ID IT'S REMOVAL ON 3/24/84. THERE ARE NO WELLS LOCATED DIRECTLY ill\lNGRADIENT OF' IBE SITE.
IN ORDER 1D F.\TALUATE AND ~KJNI'IDR THE GROUNCWATER, ADDITIONAL l'IELLS WILL HAVE TO RE INSTALLED. THE EXISTit-.'G \•,'ELL AT THE GRANGER RESIDF.NCF. C.'<N FOSSIRLY RE UTILI7,ED AS AN UPGRADIENT POSITION. IT IS RECOMMENDED Tl-'.AT NJNf. ADDITIONAL WELLS Rf: INSTALLED AS INDICATF.D ON FIGURE l • THESE \·/F:LLS \·/ILL ALIDW SA'lPLES 'ID BE DRAWN FRO~, POSITIONS WHICH SHOULD JNTE:RCEPT THE LUvNGRADIE,,'T Cat-.'TAMINATED GROUND.,!ATER, THEREBY PROVIDING SOME INF'OR1'1ATION ON THE LATERI\.L EXTENT OF' THE PWME. THF. \·/ELLS SHOULD BE C0:•1PLETED INTD THE SHAU.,G\/ AQUIFER 10 APPROXIMATELY 15 Ff;F.T. THE \-.'ELL SCREE:NS SHOULD BE POSITIONED 2 F'E:E:T ABOVE THF: EXISTING WATER TABLE, CONTINUJl,r, 5 Ff~F.T INTC THE SATUPATED ZONF. THI:: W!:LLS INSTALLED NEAR THE WI•/ SWAMPY AREA 1,JILL PRORABLY f:NCOllNTER GROlJND\·IATER VF:RY NEAP THE SURFACE. AT LFAST IBJE D:•\'JNGRl\DIP.NT ANn O~IP. Ul"GRADH'.NT SHAU.Di' I/ELL SHOULD BE ACCO:-lPANIED BY A DF:EPER WELL COMPLSTf.:,D INTO THE: HIGH POROSITY CO.i\RS8 SAN!:t; f~XffCTP.D AT APPROXIr-ti\TF:LY 3(1 F'Ef.:T.
• • North Carolina Department of Natural.
Resources & Community Development
DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT
Robert F. Helms
Director
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor James A. Summers, Secretary Telephone [phone]
Groundwater Section
10 April 1984
Mr. Alan C. Leggett, Geologist
Hazardous Waste Technology Services
3300 Marjan Drive
Atlanta, Georgia 30340
APR l l 1984
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
Dear Mr. Leggett: DEM
On April 3, 1984 Hazardous Waste Technology Services was granted
,perinission to construct six (6) monitor wells in variance to 15 NCAC
ZC.0108 (b)(2). This letter is to infonn you that pursuant to
15 NCAC 2C.0114 (a)(l)(G) that the Division is requesting that well
cuttin.gs be collected as described below.
A) That well cuttings be collected from one(l) down gradient well.
B) That the well cuttings be collected at approximately every
two foot intervals.
C) That the well cuttings be collected as split samples.
D) That the samples be placed in glass containters furnished
by the Department.
E) Forty-Eight [48) hours prior to well construction, the
IJilmington Regional Office will be notified at 256-4161
so that the sample containers can be provided on site.
F) Upon completion of construction the Wilmington Regional
Office is to be notified so that the samples can be
picked up.
Additional samples may also be required from another well
at this site. We will let you know as soon as this is finalized.
If you have any questions, please give me a call at. 733-5083.
AM/ce
cc: Bi 11 Myers
Rick.Shiver ,
Permit ·Fnes
aZ Arthur 11oube~~7
Operations Branch
POLLUTION PREV~NT/ON PAYS
_. I' 0. Box 27687. Raleigh, N.C:27611-7687
An Equal Opportu'!ity_ A!fl'.~atlve Action Employer
• /, ',-:,; • ·••.,,,'.f -"•._:•!~::r.;~-~•-/!' •h•• • =~~.{•:: .>: • =-• -,•:~.' .•
•
68 Wilmington Morning Star / Tuesday, April 3, 1984
EPA prepares·i~-end ~
cleanup at dump .site
By Deborah Kellv · · i~g more than· 150 dump.'truck loads of
Stair Writer • oily dirt. •·• . · .
· The Environmental Protection Agen• Three fa,;,ilies that were moved from
cy 1s wrapping up its cleanup of an il-the site last mon_th while .the cleanup
legal toxic dump site near the Brunswick was m ·progress.wiJl .soon.return to their.
County community of Maco .. · . -: , · ,homes. EarLarid Dixie Gurkin, who owii
The project took only about a third of the land where the pits ·.were located,
the time originally planned. . ____ · expect to move back home with their 3.
The cleanup. which began March 21, · year-old daughter mi W,edi:iesday. Thei~
-·was expected to.take four to six weeks. , neighbors; '.Judy Chµij;_li,, and her "14c.
EPA Public Affairs Oflicer · Gordon year-old son .. and p,year,oid daughter, 0
Kenna said the only work remaimng is returned-Monday.> Ernest "Buddv"
to decontaminate the heavy equipment Granger and his wife are to return ho~e .
used in the operation, grade the land and Wednesday. · · · .,
seed the area, all of which should be . The· families were mo·ved from their
completed today. · · · . _homes .whikthe containinated•mateiial"··
• !\bout $400,000·was budgeted for the was_ being_ excavated· "because of the"·
·. project, which Kenna now says·will cost t h" th · •
closer to $250.000. . s enc · . atresulted'when the pits were''
Workers removed'I._520 tons of ,Judge 'openea, according to. Lee Alford, public''
and_ contaminated soil. -80 truckloads affairs-officer' for the hazardous waste.;·
, -··----~•from four pits at Sandy Creek Acres.·a program o_f-the N.C. Department of Hue ;.
man Resources.~-· · -trailer park otru:s. 74-76 between Delco · ·
and Leland. The waste is being taken to . Kenna_ S'1jd the.EPA has accomplished
a hazardous waste dump in Pinewood ·,ts objective at the site: "to remove the
S.C. The pits have been filled in. Kenn,;· c_source. of. comtamiriation" to ground-
sa1d. · · . wat~r. 'We. put.a stop to the continuing
. · Tlie land was'used ;;.,an illegal dump. release .ofccontarriination .into the shal-
·:mg-...ground ·for ·septic tank waste;·creo:: low aguifer," Kenner said. t'That was our
· ,so~ and No. 6 fuel oil from 1969 until main 'co!1~:r!1, It's p_erf~tly safe to go
, · l9t6~ Otto Skipper, then'.owner of Han-.cba~k ~?w. . , ' , ::, '•;".:: , ·
, ';-.ove~ ::ieptic Tank Co. IiI Wilmington, wiis' :-·Thir:Gurkirt:S'~contamihated' well' has.
\ ,charged by.the state Division ofEni-iron. ·.;been dug·'up and they·will<continue fo
/. _-,m,ental Manai;ement with unlawful· use the .Gtangers' well,_as thejr,water'--
~Ull)pmg m.1916 and fined .$2,500:.The .:~upply.· ... , ... · _;'. ____ ·. _ · · · __ .
'· ,:penalty was never paid because S~ipper • ,.,; Six shallow monitoring-,velkand ~ne :
went. bankrupt. · 'd ... · · ·
Th C t G d · · eep one,w11l be checked penodically by
, _ .• e_ oas uar_ ·spent about $24,000 .. DHS, Ms. Alford said.
. . ~nan mcomplete cleanup of.the property: ,· Feder°'''''Suoe· rfund" .. -> 'd '' • · · :1976. · · -. · -. -4 3u✓j • l monev pa1 rnr l'_,.11:) __ ,PllffiJ?Ing.outthepitsandremov-·the?fle~up.<• ;~ ' _·:--: -~ _ ..
. ' '
• • •
28 Wilmingto~ Morning Star I Thursday, April 5, 1984
,.
Despite EP A~s =
cleanup, family
still l1as worrie·s
By Deborah Kelly
Stafl"Writer
MACO -It's nice _to be home again, but a coup!~ \,,ho
returned to their trailer Wednesday after the.E!)i.'jron-,
mental Protection Agency completed a ·-,~w0:;.week -1
1i::"J:;:;;,;1:,'udous waste on their property~~;t~ttle !
Earl and Dixie Gurkin of Sandy Creek_ A~s;: near, . l
Maco in northern Brunswick County, say·tbey.-don't
feel much safer than they did before the EPA excavated
1,500 tons of contaminated soil from their-:Proi,erty. '
• 'a\-¼·.· . ~· ;
tilt didn't change anyihing for'me," Gurkiri~~id_i.;?Jt,'s -.. ~\
still not clean enough to put down a well. Tliey,told·us_ :,I
, before we weren't in any danger unless w01tlsed.!~e--~ i
I water: That's still what they're sayin(l', Andt~~~J~t.ill" , /
some contaminated soil. You can still smell-1t',.s;,"<, • '
. • ;,•;-f;i"· ,.· _1
1. .The land was used as an illegal dumping,groiMdfor. :, ;
\ septic tank w'IB,':ce, creo_s0'P and heavy fuel oil tt,o:~;1969 : i
, urttiJ:1976.-The Gurkms bought the propeify,:m·191!2. , ,
( without knowledge of its unsavory past. ltJi,;iJi'. _1;' • '\
, _ , i~r,:--_...g.. ... ,. , 'f.
(· ~ !I'~_rry:·Doier, ~upe~~o~ of the env_ironm~~w~~a~~---~} t
1 ;sect;10ri;~tthe· s,tate. D_1v1s10!1. of_ Health .Seryi~i}Y,lii£~·-:, t·
,·,helped_.:"'1th the_ cleanup, said Wednesday !Ii~~~"!.'-~~~,.,;::',:
1 .naq,d soil-remains in the area'because there .'!J;ll!'\~",Y, :c:,
• to get it_all. We could _excavate forever, b~t_t_~*::?l)_:"'_~ay_,H-1
on down ... to the bottom of the aqmfer 1s contannna~,: , ·
i · ed.'.' J • : • • \iit9(#:lJ?::\;
: -Dover Said the cle~~p was·intend~d·:b?J.t~~Y,~J~~p . .:~,~
~-'1mi."11ediate threat o:t direct contact:W1~h·.~~~!l~!f}'PE:ft4"t
; th8'•~\.!.ff8:_Ce or near the -surface" of._th,~ }~1-~I~f.fi~t.;-, ~J
· sense, the cleanup _was a success, but 1t <;auljijie~~d~.:;,t/
be' th t · ·s ·'e to drink he·sa1d"""'$e.,, · ',<.· · ! J 1ore. ,e wa er 1 .sw1 , • •• :~f~~~~i;:~·•;;;:,_
.t •1The· Site hasn't been written off,''.. Dover"·S~tilpe\•·e_fl · .. !
monitoring wells will be installed on the pro,~1Jl':tlii,J;
next two weeks to assess groundwatei")con~~10n1_ -:. _.--{·
_he said. .'. . · ·i:,)~~;;~ ~-~-\~ ~
. _ Gtirk_in ~aid he wants 0 m~ve his Wifei~d~~~!~J;.;;;~~
_daughier,,Pamela, off the property, but;can.J)]jf.Qr,4,1/J,'f
unless he sells the land or reaches a settlement',w1ili,the,-..,.~
':le?.~•••'-_: l'-DeOple who sold the property to him: c/.;•,·.;;,i;;;i;,i;):;,.'7;:;1•_.'
• ' ·'.·•·"':"•;<~¼-""r,01.,_;:,,_,1.t
·,:~·. '!Who's going to buy it if yo!:1 can't P·v.f~~JfV{~~~~.:l,;.;!{
· Gurkin-said. '~e-~~n't_--w8:11t to sta)~.~~J;_lJlltw i~~:~f;t!Y
have much cho,ce. 1 -; , ....... ;;._ • ., '.t--'---:-.;. !
. • --. ~ _, ~"':<. • , ..
''I-w~nt ·a·P_lace with.my own .Welfr.Jifefe"1 6i{~l
su:e -:,~eTe· a..~n't an~ dang~r(?U~_ch~¥i.~11 -.:~~~
•,aid. Sm glad Pa':'e!a can play m'_t~~l.>',., -~111
Im still warned about the year we used, -~"!tc
~-nated water.:' 1 ; . • _. s . -~~,I.:~-
• . . ' . • ; .•'ij..._
1·~~ ·-The Gnrkiris·will continue,to·use7Watg
,· ·orangei-1s well across the =street·· -;. ~;~;.
--~:--~-~---':.; ...... "'' .--: .
•
Waste
cleanup
begins
By Deborah Kelly
Stuff Writ.er
\:,,'i-1~'.,., -•.-,:.f;1." ,a.I ,~;",i, .·~ '.-.1/>, • I
· . Keepmg.• secrets could;cost/ lourM' ::, l
.develop' ers $393'.ooo·J,: th'eestim'iit!'f;'1,·,;.' .,; .d , .. ,, .,., f-· :"·••·',,· .. "1··":ir.",.~·· · l" .. -~,·1·' <19ve,.i.
· e cost o. -·cleanmg .up ·an, 11 ega f> •:·
dump site near Maco. ;-:-.: ' : ~
The land where septic tank
sludge, creosote and fuel oil was
dumped -an area now known as
Sandy Creek Acres -changed·
hands three to four times before it
wns purchased. by Earl and Dixie
Gurkin. The Gurkins, who bought
the property, put·a trailer on the
site and moved there in 1982, were
never told the land was used as an
illegal dumping ground· from 1969-
until 1976.
For a year, the Gurkins and their.
3-year-old daughter drank contami-.
nated water from a well on the prop;•
erty. '
The person charged with illegally
disposing lhe·waste wa~·Otto Skip-.
per, then-owner of Hanover Septic -
Tank Co. in Wilmington. He was
charged in 1976 with unlawful.
dumping anddiried $2,500 by the
state Divison of Environmental
Management/\ ' ·,: ·,
· 'Skipper went bankrupt and tli~"
·penalty was never paid. '.·
. ' · ... ' ' . ,,, ,· 1, ' ·,'
The fedeial\lEnvironmental Pro!•
tection Agency· expects to spend ·
$393,000 on tlie 'cleanup, which be'
gan Wednesday and will take about .
four weeks 'tO complete. Gordon·
Kenna, public 'affairs officer for the'
EPA, said Thursday the EPA will'
conduct a ucost recovery investiga-.
tion''. of the'pilst 'tiwners of the land·
after the cleanup· operation is com:
pleted. · , · l
-."The person,who put the material
in an_d all tlie subsequent landown'
ers, are considered potentially re-
sponsible PB.rt.ies," Kenn~ snid.l.
"The law says· all'those people are
potentially responsible for the costs
of the cleanup."
Wachovia Bank in Goldsboro ac-
quired the property in 1979 during
foreclosure proceedings. Wachovia
sold it in November 1980 to Wilbur
and Barbara McLamb of South
Carolina and Jimmy and Peggy
Cain of North Carolina, according
lo pavid Ford, a Long Beach law-
yer. He filed ·a $194,000 lawsuit-on.
behalf of the Gurkins in October ·
I•
I
1983 .to recover their money and .1 •
damages. · . · ' , · 1
. In April 1981, the McLambs sold
a portion of the land to H.J. and Ada
· Anderson of South Carolina, accord-
ing to Ford's lawsuit. About a year.
later, the McLambs and Andersons,
conveyed the property to· Investors
Management Corp., ._"a corporation
formed and owned bv one or more of
the defendants Mc Lambs, Cains.
, and An~~rso11," .,the iawsuit s;ate!,,'.·, ,:-,
:·-IP:Yesto1",J~a.~age~·ent .i~·.t}lJ .. ~.oJP~}. ·;G,.·t
.pil!_1Y··t~~~!:~~Yf,lqp~q•:~~ndy; Q.f~e}!:·%S1'.:i
Acres;: .'i • ;.'1, f ·• -r 1 .·.' ·:·)'··u~·· ,:'~-
Ford· says William. Cooke ar-·
ranged for the purchase of Lot 85 in
Sandy Creek Acres by the Gurkins
in July 1982. He also is named as:a
defendant in the lawsuit. ·
"I don't think there will be a
criminal case, but there could be .a
civil case11 against the previous
ownerS, Kerina said. "We're re ..
quired by law to try to recover the
costs of the cleanup."
The Coast Guard spent more
than $24,000 on an incomplete
cleanup of the site in 1976, pumpirig
out the pits and removing . more
t~an 150.d?,inP ._\ruck loads of .o.!)~
dirt. ·, ·1~ ,),,_,· .. ,\ ·. , .
, 1· , r ,, ' ,., •
1' Gut·kin said he "has soine'ill f~el;
ings" for the people who knew of the ·
land's unsavory history and never
mentioned it during subsequent
sales 'of the property. . ,
Wilmington Morning Star /'Friday, March 23, 1984
,; WP UU.¢0-4--1 ~,-5 @W&:, '$ fr®&lt/t1 .
l ' ' [fi :.>/~>: ' '
\
••
•
•
• UNITED STATES fv1RONMENTAL PROTECTION AGilY
DATE: March 23, 1984 APR 19 19
sua,EcT, Excavation Rationale at Potter's Pits Site, Maco, NC.
FR0"-1:
TO:
Sue Fields, Project Officer Region IV ;;..,,_";2:~
File APR 30 1984
WILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
DEM
HISTORICAL INFORMATION INDICATES THAT THE POTTERS PITS SITE WAS USED AS A
DISK>SAL AREA FOR A UNKNOWN VARIETY OF QIEMICAL AND OOMESTIC WASTE MATERIALS.
THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT WASTE OILS, SOLVENT WASTES, AND DOMESTIC SEWAGE WERE
DISPOSED OF ONSITE, THE WASTES WERE APPARENTLY OOMPED INTO SHALIOW UNLINED
LAGOONS, NARR.CM TRENQIES, AND DIRECTLY ON THE SOIL SURFACE,
THE PRESENCE OF OILY WASTES WERE EVIDENCED BY AN OIL SPILL ~-IICH OCCURRED
IN 1976 WHEN ONE OF THE LAGOON BERMS FAILED. APPROXIMATELY 20,000 GALIDNS OF
MATERIAL WERE IDST. PRESENCE OF SOLVENT WASTES IS INDICATED BY 'IBE
CONTAMINATION OF GROUNCWATER UNDER THE SITE WITH A VARIETY OF. SOLVENTS,
THE OBJECTIVE OF THE CURRENT EPA REMOVAL ACTIVITY IS TO REMOVE THE SOURCE
OF CONTAMINATION EXERrING ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE.GROUNCWATER. IBIS MATERIAL IS
BEING DEFINED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PROJECT AS THE ORIGINAL IAGOON(I'RENQ-1
VOWMES, THE HEAVY ASPHALTINE SWD3E LAYER WHICH w::JULD BE EXPECTED TO FORM THE .
OOTI'OM OF LAGOONS HOLDING THE ABOVE MENTIONED MATERIALS IS EVIDENI' IN THE
SUBSURFACE SOIL STRATA UNCOVERED BY THE EXCAVATION. THIS LAYER IS BEING USED TO
DELINIATE THE MAXIMUM EXCAVATION DEPTH,
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE SANDY BJ'ITOM OF THE LAGOONS w::JULD NOT PREVENT THE
MOVEMENT OF CONTAMINANTS WHIQ-1 ARE SOLUBLE, OR OTHERWISE MOBILE THROUGH lHESE
HIGH PERMEABILITY SOILS. THE SANDS UNDERLYING THE SWD3E LAYER SHOW EVIDENCE OF
SIGNIFICANT GPSOLINE/SOLVENT CDNTAMINATION, ASSUMING THESE (OR SIMILAR
. MATERIALS) ARE PRESENT, ONCE THEY BREACHED THE IAGOON BJ'ITOM IBEY W)ULD BE
DISTRIBUTED EXTENSIVELY THROUGHOUT BOTH THE UNSATURATED AND SATURATED ZONES,
DUE TO. THESE FACTORS, IT W)ULD NOT BE FEASIBLE TO RECOVER ALL 'lliE CONTAMINATED
SOILS VIA EXCAVATION, AS THE VOWME w::JULD BE TREMEN!XlUS, BY Rm:JVING THE
HEAVILY CONTAMINATED SOILS ABOVE THE SWD3E IAYER THE MASS OF CONTAMINANTS IN
THAT MATERIAL WILL NOT BE AVAIIABLE TO LEACH THROUGH THE UNSATURATED ZONE, AND
ULTIMATELY, INTO THE GROUNCWATER, THIS ACTION WILL ATTENUATE TiiE TIME NECESSARY
FOR THE AQUIFER TO NATURALLY PURGE THE CDNTAMINANTS, ALTHOUGH THE TIME FRAME
FOR THE AQUIFER RECOVERY WILL STILL BE MANY YEARS •. AN ADDITIONAL BENEFIT OF
REMOVING THE ORIGINAL LAGOON VOWME WILL BE MITIGATION OF THE ADVERSE EFFECTS
ON THE SURFACE SOIL HORIZON, AU.OWING RESTABLISHMENT OF THE NORMAL VEGE:I'ATION.
NUISANCE OOORS AND SURFACE SEEPS OF THE OILY MATERIAL WILL ALSO BE ELIMINATED,
Sue Fields
EPA Form 1320·6 (Ro. J-76)
Stoff phalo by Grny Hanoycull
Dixie Guri<ln packs her car in ·preparation for a four-week stay
away from her home in Sandy Creek Acres. In the foreground Is a
mound of dirt tested by the state.
Ernest Granger
. Continued from 1A
porary liolising.
The dumped waste is on property
nwned hy the Gurkins. Their \','(di,
which is 22 fei!t deep. "go\~s sma<.:k
dab into one of those nits,." said Lee
Alford, ;::-PubliC af[;in; (;mccr for
the N .C. Department of Human He-
suurces. The state's solid and haz-
ardous waSte management br11nch, ·
part of that department, is provi<l~
ing sampling-and analytical sup-
pnrt.
The Gurkin, used I.he well from
th•, linH.' they moved onlo.lhc prop-
erty in July 1982 until they were
told to st.op n year later. Since July
1983 they have used water from the.
Grnngers' well, which tests showed
is not polluted.
The Gurkins are glad thC sludge·
will be: removed, but are dismayed
by how long it has taken slate and
. focicra! onici~1ls tn act.. '!'hey snid
they could not afford to move with-
out tmvernmcnL as.siHtancc.
Dixie Gurkin
"I've thought all along they
should have been doing something
before now," said Gurkin, who
stopped using his well .water in July·
1983 after tests showed it was con-
taminated. "You never like to leave
your home, but I guess it's better
than Htaying here."
Granger ·voiced similar senti-
ment.s. ''I don't like it, but I would ratil'ei'Iefl.Vc .. tha11 iive ·on· i('. .
Mrs. Gurkin said 3-year-old Pa-
mela also did not want to leave her
home. ''.She said if we had to go she
wanted to take her swing set and
sandbox," Mrs. Gurkin said. "She\{
.going to have to leave behind most
of her toys, too."
Although medical tests on the
Gurkins showed no abndrmalities,
they still arc worried abot1t adverse
health effects that could crop up lat-
er. "We're worried most about our
little girl," Mrs. Gurkin said. "She's
our main concern, because she's so
young. It's terrible '.o think she
could get cancer because of this.
Yeah, we think abow; it n lot. lt's ·
scary."
"I would really hate for her to get
P. lA
Families
pacl( U}l
and leave··
dump site
By Deborah Kelly
Stnff Writer
MACO -· Three families moved
out of their mobile .homes here
Wednesdny as the federal Environ-
mental. Protection Ag?ncy began
cleaning up an illegal toxic waste
dump in one family's front· yard.
The cleanup, expected to take
. four weeks and cost $393;000, is to .
remove septic tank sludge1 creosote
and No. 6 fuel oi I. The waste was
dumped near this Brunswick Coun-
ty community between -1969 and
197!), in what later became, the
Sandy Creek Acres subdivision.
The federally financed "Super-
fund" program wil!'foot the cleanup
bills.
Nine people were relocated from
the mobile .home comm.unity
Wednesday at federal ex1i'ense. Earl
and Dixie Gurkin and their 3-yoar-
old duu1;hte,-moved to Lcing Beach;
Judy Church and her 1.4-yearsold
son and ll-yenr-old' daughter
moved t0 another trailer' in· Sandy
Creek Acres; and Ernest· :.'Buddi'
Granger. and his wife moved.to Lake
Waccamaw.
They will return to their homes
when the cleanup is completed. The
EPA is paying an average of about
$200 a week per family for the tern-
Please see SLUDGE, 7 A
F', 7 A
Earl Gurlcin
sick and be messed up on account of
this," Gurkin said. "[ just don't
know what I would do."
There are 22 trailers in the mo-
bile home park, most of them on
two-t.o three-acre tracts.
The Gurkins originally planned
to move Monday, but difficulties
with finding a_ place to stay-forced
them to remain until Wednesday,
Thi~ EPA rCCjucSted ·thiit'.thc ·ram.:
ilies leave the area while the con-
.taminated material is: .being .exca-
vated ':because of the stench that is
going to rise when these pits arc
dug up," Ms. Alford said. ,..-
The air will be monitored during
the cleanup to assure that unsafe
conditions do nOt occur while work
is in progress. HazTech of Atlanta is
the contn1ctor hired by EPi to
clean up the pits. Workers will wear
protective clothing··arid fes·pirators
throughout the Operation1 Ms. Alford said some.of the roads
· in the area would be closed at differ-'·,,,.,
ent times during the project.,In,ad-;tf;'
dition, n security force·will· patr_ol ·
the area 24 hours a day to. prot_e~t
the vacant homeS, she.said.: :.-.. ,
•
•
•
lamily Leaving Home Till.1Jangero11:s Slu4ge I~. Rf'!f<f~:ed
By JACK HORAN. . . According to EPA, the cleanup will ·take four to six me~t firm lJougl)t qie p~ciperty:·~c.~~f~\~ito 0.?vid _Ford, a
s10ttw,11" weeks and cost as much as $400,000. The cleanup will be lawyer for the,Gurkins, the'couple got.the property·by
Earl and Dixie Gurkin and their :!-year-old daughter, paid for by the federal "superfund" program,. but -EPA purchasing a land safes' contrai:i'.irom a'nian who lived at
mela, 11lan to move from their mobile home near Wil-spokesman Gordon -Kenna said the agency will try to re-the site. , · .') :, ... · ·;;: · · : ( ... ' · ·'' . ·
ngton today to a $195-a-week rented house on nearby cover the costs from the company -now out of business ,, The Gurklns say didn't .know,the,sludge. was beneath
ng Beach. -that dumped the sludge In four pits. their property ·when'they moved.there ln.19·s2'but,'rioticed
But the Gurkins aren't going to the beach on a vacation. "The sludge in the pits consists of septic tank wastes, oil Y{~ter fro~i a w.~H.otl JhC site 'tllSt~d·.-fu~f/,\: ,1. 1\'.1;'.', ~· .·, ":
They're leaving because the U.S. Environmental Protec-and creosote," said Lee Alford, spokeswoman for the. haz• r 1 '!'hey stopped_ qri~~!~~ tre•,-'),'_qt_~r Jas\_;,:i'.f~fi/lJter}t~te
n Agency (EPA) Wednesday began a cleanup of hazard-ardous waste program In the N.C. Department of Human· ·officials ·(ourid 1t .. conta!llinated,,f~rl •<;,ur,¥,\n said ~h.ey've
s-waste sludge that permeates part of the soil and· Resources. , suffered no Ill e(fe_~ts,; ,, .:., · ·:· ,,, ,1 , .,, h-i'. .. , ., i, .. ,J..
oundwater under the Gurkins' 3.4 acres. This isn't the first time a federal agency has ordered at ·:;Meanwhile, the Gurkins .have sued the firm; Investors
"Thev're just moving us out while they do the cleanup," cleanup at Potter's Pits, used between 1969 and 1976., Management' Corp., ·an~'seven:individuals who·had:an In-
id E,irl Gurkin, a 3:1-year-ol<l welding supervisor, as When the U.S. Coast Guard discovered an oil slick In the terest i~ the property :[of da.\riag~sJ~~ :m'en\~l1dlstre~s,
,rkers scl up a trailer and moved in a backhoe. EPA is Cape Fear River in 1976, officials traced the source of the Ford said. No trial ·date has been ,set for. the Gurklns'
ying the rent as well as a $-10-a-day•food allowance. oil up a creek to a broken dike at one of the pits. $!i84,000 sul\. · · : . '.'. · ·· ' . .' ;, ·,1· .. , •· · ·,: ', ,' , .,, . ' '.·. 1
While the Gurkins and lwo other families are away, an The Coast Guard ord<,red oil pumped out of the pits and · Herbert Anderson; president-of Investors Management,
Ian ta firm hired \1y EPA will dig out and haul off the sand mixed with the remaining sludge that couldn't be denied he or· the company knew,;_~bou\ ',trr .s\udge, \V)i~n
1dge from "Potter's Pits," a former dump site in Bruns-pumped out and the mixture burie<l. Gurkin bought the property: . "We,: Y(.er~ J~~t as Ila&
ick County, ,· After a bank foreclosure, a Little River, S.C., develop-gasted;as he was,'' Anderson said,lj ·. ·_, ·,, , ...
C.l-lA b...1,..on ~:
•
i7-ZG...l S
' r ,
/
-', ; . ' ·;:.-:·J:_ .. ·,, ..
. .. ......... ,._
/ . . phO!O
Earl and Dixie Gurk.ln eland In front of the!; home with p~·rn.oto. :
By Deborah' Kelly
Storr Writer
The Environmental Rrotection
Agency will begin cleaniii'g up ah
illegal. chemical waste dump In
Brunswick County . today, eight
months after n family living on the
property learned of the contnmine•.
tion,
Earl and Dixie Gurkin of Sandy
Creek Acres trailer park, off U.S.
74-76 between .Delco and Leland,
wero told not to use their well water
in July 1983, The state Division of
Health Services issued that warn-
ing ufter tests •howcd the water was
polluted. , . •
The Gurkins and their 3-yeur-old
daughter, Pamela, have lived on the
contamina'ted 31/, acreR since July
1982. They discovered the problem
when Gurkin dug into an area
where ·grass would not grow, Thick,
dark slucjg~-\l'a• \l!l~~rtp~d. four Ip
six feet' below the surface: '
The fedo.ra! '1Supe~funq" \viii' pay
for the cleanup, whicli is expected to
take four to six weeks and may cost
as much as $400,000, according io
Gordon Kenna of tho EPA's Atlant'n
office.· ·
Tho waste · remained after a
cleanup in August .1n~-It will be
disposed of in a hazardous waste
dump in Pinewood, S.C., or Emelle,
Ala., said Bob Humphries, EPA
spokesman. · · ' ·
A series of monitoring wells will
be installed to determine whether
Pleoae see DUMP,.5A
'·
-~ ... ';r:.-~ · . ,_r.,.~:-~--·--:"'..,..,. ..... _ ......._. .. ..:.. . . . .
Dump ·asking for $194,000 in actual dam-
·ages 8.nd ir~ recompense for mental
anguish. .
The source of the contamination
goes back more than eight years,
according to Ray Church, a waste
management specialist in the state
Division of Health Services solid
and hazardous waste management
branch. At that tiriie, the state Divi-
sion of Environinental Man·age-
ment discovered that betwee·n 1969
and 1976 a septic tank pumper had
dumped septic tank sludge, 20,000,
gallons of number six fuel oil and
creosote into four pits on what· is
·now the Gurkins' front yard.
charged by the DEM ·in 1976 .with ,;
unlawful dumping. and' fined
$2,500. The penalty was not paid,
because · Skipper went bankrupt,
Church said. . ·. . \
Continued from IA
any other water source has been
contaminated. The N.C. Depart-
ment of Human·Resources will test
soil and-water in the area.
The Gurkins were moved by the
EPA Monday, according to their
lawyer, David Ford of Long Beach,
Ford is trying to get back the money
the Gm·kins paid for the property
and find out why they were ne,ver ·
told of its history. He has filed a
lawsuit on behalf of tho Gurkins
. Otto Skipper, owner of Hanover
Se~tic Tank Co. \n Wilmington, was
The Coast Guard paid more than
$24,000 for the·fir~t cleanup:-More
than 150 dump truck· loads, of ,oil'. ' i
sludge and oil-stained dirt were l,
transferred to the Brunswick Coun-
ty landfill in August 1976'. , "':
"The Comprehensive Environ-.
mental Response Compensation·
and Liability Act ·,if 1980 · estab-
lished-the Superfundfrom $1.6,bil-·
lion in taxes on·_oiE and chemical' •'
·products. The EPA administers the ,;,
fund, paying for the·tcleanup cif
abandoned hazardo~s waste si!es.
•
•
•
•
' 'I
.· I ;
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March ~o;, 1984 ·
Mr. Chris Leggett . c/o Hazardous l~ast~ Technology Services 3300 Marjan Drive ·
Atlanta, Georgia 30340
Subject: Gurkin's Site· (Potter's Pit) Maco
Brunswick County
Dear M~. Leggett:
As· requested by Ms •. ,Sue Fields, attached please find, copies of the following: · ·
I' .•• 1. 1 A map that shows the location of 'the Maco Research Station ,in relationship .to the Gurkin's Site;
2. A condensed summary of the lithologic description performed : on well cuttings col.lected from the ~1<Ploratory :borehole;
3. All geophysical logs performed ··on this same borehole;. ·
4. Completed well records on the permanent w~lls construct~d: on.the site. :· · ·
If you have questions, please·~-~ advise •.
RS/sf
·Enclosures:
· cc: . ArtJ)ur Moub_erry
·t;,.Mtk Shiver
Sincerely,.
D.._,SS
Rick Shiver
Regional Hydrologisf
,.
'· ' i'
-.. •· ..
I•
, .
'.·.·
•. ,':'J'J4~l~ ZP~ AG/, . , cc: './1.+jJni:" l')Oflf,Gl.L/1
.. ' .
' ..... ,·
_,
C:GU j /JU!i j Hi\-qi.01 OilF t
{)~CF 2t,q AGJ..
..
on !<+trG i~ ~$ ~ , ..
co1,Jb-jGfGCJ, ;,:Gjj 1.:;co1..q2 (1:J +i_JG" b\;/.lilSiJSIJf' MGJ j.2. C0U2j:i,i!Cj:6q.
~j' .t'Jj rlfiOOJJll~jC~j JC<)Z bGl,l,OU!Jfiq ,QU ;::,F "29"UG po;,G,:OJG:.
'
o:; '''"'JJ cn.~.quilz coJj&cp:;(! .-l),OJJ .;::i;,: ,,x,:Jcrs.sfo1J, :r,(;1,1;1:ojG: s· \l <:O:XJ6!J26(j zmu-.i:g;..'), O,h +PG J!l])OJJC:JC qc.c1.pr.1ou iJGl.-l,OJ.l'.JGq ·
·.r0 nJs cn1.r 1 u, 2 2l ::& ,
J' ,/<i .,,m .f.fl£+ 2po;12 r?JG jOCg.f.101J_Ci, _{:µG \/!!CO 1!6"21'!11..C}J 2~gnc,u _!lJ L6jS'.;:·lC!J2µjb
)_(1jJOMpa:
'tfZ LGcirt62fG(; p?\ U?. ··2nG lJGJq2.4 g~+scµ~q bJG92G•t~uq· cob4;2 Vt 1:ti~.
. tr·~J :9b~S ~ JC(;J..i.l~..J. .Jt1:S•,;·c
3:J~j;J i~9L'rJL: [)J...J A!?i
c\o HsS.\IT.(jlll1"2 ,1,;c:t& iOC[JllOJ()i1A 2Gl,AJCfJ2 ...
i:·t-.· t,]l"-4.i? ruL~!u,:-r
, .
I •
Date
From
Subject
To
'111ru:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & H·~ SERVi°CES • Public H-eaith Service
Centers for Disease Control
Memorandum
M:trch 12, 1984
Public Health Advisor
CDC/EPA Liaison
Potter's Pits CERCTA Site;
113.co, North carolina
SUe Fields, EPA/ERRB
Jan Rogers, EPA/ERRB OSC
Per your request, the following has been preP3Ied for inclusion in the
10 Point D::x::urrent being preP3Ied to request cleanup funds for the above
referenced site.
Although I have not been able to visit this site yet to begin to ascertain
the potential health threat that it poses, I have relied upon the EPA site
file, EPA and state sanpling data and discussions with Jan Rogers about his
findings that resulted fran his August 1983 investigation trip to the site
to preP3Ie the following.
4. 'lllreat to Hunan Heal th
A.
B.
c.
D.
Appraxirrately 25 area residents are directly affected.
Persons living on and in the irmediate area of the developing
sub-division that is being constructed on top of the site.
Sub-division residents.
'lhe contaminated pathways that present hurran health threats
appear to be:
1. Groundwater: docurrented contamination of private & rronitoring
. viells by creosote & other hydr=arbans.
~-~
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
SUrfacewater: observed runoff fran site enter.ing creek adjacent
to site.
Air: docurrented anbient air contamination .in areas of onsite
. auger holes.
Direct Contact: docurrented migration of subsurface contaminants
to soil surfaces of residential properties.
Soil Contamination: docurrented onsite contamination by EPA ESD
--soil sanple analyses.
Drinking Water: docurrented presence of nurrerous contaminants
near & above permissible concentrations to
protect hurran health .in drinking supply and
rronitoring viells.
E. No reports of illness, injury, etc. available at this t:in'e.
F. Consideration should be given to temporarily relocating selected
area residents during soil excavation & rerroval activities.
page 2 • •
6. SUmrary of Overall 'lllreat
A. 'lllreats to hurra.n health have been docurrented for at least ~ rrajor pathways. A high potential exists for additional pathway
contamination. See 4.D. above for specific pathway infonratian. B. · N/A
C. Certification that site presents hurra.n health threat and warrants :imrediate cleanup by: Dr. Frank Mitchell, OX/ATSDR, on 3/9 .84
(FI'S 236-4100) and Dr. Ron Levine, Director, North Carolina Department of Hurran Resources, on 3/12 .84 (919-733-3446).
e,...L ~ zs'
Chuck Pietrosewicz
• •
TO SUE FIEU::S, PO REGION IT/ EPA
FROM R.W. CIBUI.SKIS, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST, ERT
RE GROUND'VATER MONITORING AT THE POTTERS PITS SITE -MACO, N.C.
l'UIIER:s PITS SITE
GROUNIWATER MONITORING
CONTAMINATION OF THE SHALI.OW AQUIFER HAS BEEN !XlCUMENTED AT TRE POTTERS
PITS SITE BY TRE PRESENCE OF PHENOL AND VARIOUS SOLVENTS IN THE DRINKING WATER
TAKEN FROM BOTH A RESIDENTIAL AND A MONITORING WELL ONSITE. THE SOILS BEING
EXCAVATED FROM TRE SITE ARE GROSSLY CONTAMINATED WITR BLACK OILY swrx;E, AND
TRE SANDY SOILS BEI.ffi THE EXCAVATED PIT APPEAR TO CONTAIN GASOLINE/SOLVENT
COITTAMINATION. TRE AQUIFER SURFACE IS AT APPROXIMATELY 8 FEET, AND THE SOILS
ARE A FINE SAND-SANDY CLAY. OOE TO THESE FACTORS, GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION IS
PROBABLY EXTENSIVE, AND MONITORING IS ESSENTIAL TO DETERMINE TRE EXTENT TO
WHIQl THE AQUIFER HAS BEEN AFFECTED.
AT PRESENT, THERE ARE NO SITE SPECIFIC IlZ\.TA TO INDICATE THE FLOW DIRECTION
OF THE SHALLOW AQUIFER, NOR THE VELOCITY OF GROUNCWATER MOVEMENT. OBSERVATION
OF THE TOPCGRAPHY AND SURFACE FEATURES IN TRE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE SITE
INDICATE THAT GROUNCWATER PROBABLY FLOWS IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION ACRCSS
TIIE SITE. TIIE PRESENCE OF A SWAMPY AREA AND STREAM TO THE NORTH/NORTHEAST OF
TIIE SITE, WITH TOPCGRAPHY SLOPING TOWARDS 'IBIS AREA, TEND TO SUPPORT THE
HYPOTIIESIS OF A NORTHEASTERLY GROUNCWATER MOVEMENT.
THERE ARE FOUR EXISTING WELLS IN THE VICINITY OF THE SITE. ASSUMING THE
GROUNCWATER Fiffi IS IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION, ONE OF THESE WELLS ( GRANGER
RESIDENCE) IS LOCATED UPGRADIENT, AND IS FREE OF COITTAMINANI'S. TRIS WELL,
HCWEVER, DRAWS GROUNCWATER FROM APPROXIMATELY 60 FEET. THE GURKINS WELL IS
LOCATED THROUGH ONE OF TRE PITS TO ABOUT 25 FEET, AND IS CONIAMINATED. ANO'IHER
WELL IS LOCATED DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO TRE GURKINS PROPERTY, APPROXIMATELY l 00
FEET TO TIIE NORTHWEST. THIS WELL ( MWl )IS COMPLETED TO 10-12 FEET, AND WAS
REPORTED TO BE HIGHLY COITTAMINATED PRIOR TO IT'S REMOVAL ON 3/24/84. THERE; ARE
NO WELLS LOCATED DIRECTLY IlJWNGRADIENT OF TIIE SITE.
IN ORDER TO EVALUATE AND l'KlNITOR TRE GROUNa-lATER, ADDITIONAL Wr;LLS WILL HAVE
TO BE INSTALLED. THE EXISTING WELL AT THE GRANGER RESIDENCE CAN POSSIBLY BE
UTILIZED AS AN UPGRADIENI' POSITION. IT. IS RECOMMENDED THAT NINE ADDITIONAL
WELLS BE INSTALLED AS INDICATED ON FIGURE 1 • TIIESE WELLS WILL ALLOW SAMPLES TO
BE DRAWN FROM POSITICNS WHIQl SHOULD INTERCEPT THE IlJWNGRADIENT CONIAMINATED
GROUNJ:WATER, THEREBY PROVIDING SOME INFORMATION ON TRE LATERAL EXTENT OF THE
PUJME. TRE WELLS SHOULD BE COMPLETED INTO TIIE SHALI.OW AQUIFER TO APPROXIMATELY
15 FEET. THE WELL SCREENS SHOULD BE POSITIONED 2 FEET ABOVE THE EXISTING
WATER TABLE, CONTINUING 5 FEET INTO TRE SATURATED ZONE. THE WELLS INSTALLED
NEAR TRE LOW SWAMPY AREA WILL PROBABLY ENCOUNTER GROl.JNOOATER VERY NEAR TRE
SURFACE. AT LEAST ONE i:OvNGRADIENT AND ONE UPGRADIENT SHALLCW WELL SHOULD BE
ACCOMPANIED BY A DEEPER WELL COMPLETED INTO THE HIGH POROSITY·COARSE SANO,
EXPECTED AT APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET.
•
ONCE THE WELLS ARE INSTALLED AQUIFER DATA CAN BE DEVELOPED TO VERIFY THE
GROUNDwATER DIRECTION AND VEUX:ITY. IF THESE DATA INDICATE A GROUNDwATER FI.OW
DIRECTION SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM THE ASSUMPTION STATED, ADDITIONAL
WELLS MAY HAVE TO BE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE ADE<XJATE GROUNCWATER MONITORING.
AITER DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEW WELLS, THE WELL ARRAY INCLUDED IN THE
MONITORING SCHEME { SEE TABLE l ) SHOULD BE SAMPLED. THIS SAMPLING PROGRAM
SHOULD BE REPEATED MONTHLY FOR A SIX MONTH PERIOD, AND THEN CONTINUED ON YEARLY
INTERVALS.
ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS FOR THE MONITORING PROGRAM SHOULD BE THE VOLATILE
ORGANIC PRIORITY POLWI'ANI"S. THESE PARAMETERS ARE SUGGESTED TO MONITOR THE
VARIOUS SOLVENTS CURRENTLY CONTAMINATING THE GROUNDwATER. AFTER A SUFFICIENT
DATABASE HAS BEEN DEVELOPED, IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO MONITOR FOR A FE,W INDICATOR
CONTAMINANTS, THEREBY REIXJCING ANALYTICAL COSTS.
WELL CONSTRUCTION
SHALLOW WELLS - { ABOVE CLAY CONFINING LAYER, IF PRESENT
COMPLETED TO 10-15 FEET.
GALVANIZED SCREEN {APPROX. 7 IT.)
SCREENED APPROX. 2' ABOVE WATER TABLE
GRAVEL PACK APPROX. 2' ABOVE SCREEN
GROUT TO SURFACE W/ CEMENT.
SECURITY WELL CAP W/ UX:KING LID.
DEEP WELLS - { BEI.00 CONFINING LAYER, IF PRESENT)
COMPLETED TO 25-35 FEET.
GALVANIZED SCREEN FROM SILT TRAP TO CLAY LAYER.
GRAVEL PACK TO CLAY LAYER.
BEN'IONITE 10 2' INTO UNCONFINED A(XJIFER.
GROUT 10 SURFACE W/ CEMENT.
SECURITY WELL CAP W/ UX:KING LID.
(2)
• •
PO'ITERS PITS SITE
TABLE 1
GROUNruATER MONIIDRING -WELL Af/J?AY
* 1. FIRE IDWER WELL -BACKGROUND CCNI'ROL
* 2. GRANGER WELL -UPGRADIENT POSITION (DEEP WELL-60 FEET)
* 3. GURKIN WELL -SOURCE POSITION ( IN PIT #1-25 FEET
* 4 BABSON WELL -ro.NGRADIENT ID THE NORTHWEST.
s. EPAl -IXHlNGRADIENT ID NORTHWEST. ( SHAU.CW)
.6. EPA2 -IXMNGRADIENT NORTH OF PIT #1. (SHAU.CW)
7. EPA3 -.IXMNGRADIENT NORTHEAST OF PIT #1. (SHAU.CW)
8. EPA4 -AruACENT ID EPA3, DEEP ( 30 FEET)
9. EPAS -l:nvNGRADIENT ID EAST OF PIT #1.(SHALLCW)
10. EPA6 -UPGRADIENT ID SOUTHEAST OF PIT #1. (SHALLCW)
11. EPA7 -UB3RADIENT ID SOUTilWEST OF PIT #1 • SHALL.CM WELL
CCNI'ROL.
12. EPA8 -AruACENT ID EPA7. DEEP HELL CONTROL.
13. EPA9 -SOU'IHEAST OF PIT #2.(SHALLCM)
* = EXISTING WELLS
( 3)
------
PP-DCD-W/S
\ Eb-
•
"! :::,
•
PP-MW-2
I 0
,AMPLE LOCATIONS
>OTTER'S PITS SITE
1ACO N.C.
PP-AH-1 S
PP-MW-1
DAIISON RESIDEllCE D
0
L pp PW-2W
□ FIRE WATCII TOWER
r
PP-AH-4S
.. \ .
PP-WP-3 PP-UCD-W/S ----.-. ....... ·-'• GURKIN-RESIDENCE
II ""-, D PP-All-3 ~ a t
PP-AH-5 S 11-O / ~. __ .
PP-EG-1W D o_nrNGEn RESIDENCE • L PP-~w-1w
NOT TO SCALE
0 WATER SAMPLE
a SOIL/SEDIMENT
SAMPLE
FIGURE 2
PE ff\~ tL:B ~
•
Lencer11ne ot culvert
/ Sta 0+00
I
I
NOTES:
i1 , ;1 ·z
t t
l t
I ~I ~,
All transects running from West to East
2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50
I
t .~ -~1 House
0 •
z ~t I
}
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NUMRF.RF.D TRANSECTS
begin at a point 25 ft. west of road centerline.
REO-n SERVICES, INC.
ATLANTA, GA.
GROUND PENETRATIN(; RADAR Sl1RVEY
A'r PO'l'TER'S PITS SITE
MACO, N.C.
Feb. 9, 1984
'--
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS HANAGE11ENT SYSTEM EPA•Esn,Rr.G IV ATHENS GEORGIA
10/27/83 SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA RtPORTINC SH~ET WATER
SAMPLE N0,1 83C3592 SARPLE TYPE! DRKWA
PRUJECT NO I 83•2330 PRUGRAM ELEMENT! NSf SUURCE1 pufrER 1 S PITS SITE CITYI MACO STATEI NC
~lO!~¥Nsl1¥1i.~~al"
SAMPLE COLL~CTIO~I START nATE/TIME 09/07/RJ 1100 SAMPLE CULLECT!DNI STUP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYI BRAD WALLACE RECEIVED fROHf BRAD WALLACE SAMPLE REC 1 DI DATE/TIME 09/12/83 1150 RECD BYI T AENNETT SEALED! YES
CHEMIST! RPL CHEMIST! ANALYTICAL METHOD!
REMARK! REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYI TBB
•••REMARKS•••
DATA VERIFIED BYI MAW
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A•AV>RAGE VALUE •NA•NOT ANALYZED •NAI•INTERff.RENCES •J•EST!MATED VALUE •N•PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE or PRESENCE or MATERIAL ■K•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN ■L•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN ■U•MA1EHJAL SAS ANALYZEU FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS THE HINlHUH DETECTION LIMIT,
•••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS•••••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER o,002u MG/L CYANIDE
STURtT 007~0
•
•
09/21/Bl
SAMPLF AND ANALYSIS MANAG~MENT 6YSTE~ fPA•f.SDtHF.G IV ATHENS <iF.ORGIA
PURGEABLE ORGANICS ANALYSIS, MISC DATA REPORTING SHEET ~lTEP
SA•PLE N0,1 B]Cl59l
~~3~~f:J ~8llt~1;2tl~s 51 ~~0GRAM '-LEMENT1 Nsr
CITYI •ACO STATE! NC
STATION 11011 •W•I STURET ST TON NOi
SAMPLE cgLLECTIONI START DATE/TIME 09/07/Bl lllO SAMPl,e C LLeCTIONI STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYI BRAD WALLACP. R'-CEIVED rROMI BRAO ~ALLACE SAMPLE REC 1 DI DATE,/TIME 09/12/Bl 1150 REC'D BYI T RENNETT SEALED! HS
RESULTS 200JN bOOJN IOOJN 200,tN 100JN IOOJN 50JN 50JN 50JN 50JN 50JN 50JN ~OJN
INI UG/L ~OMPOUNO NAME ETHYLCYCLOeHOPANE MtTHYLBUTANt OIMETHYLCYCLOPENTANE (2 ISOMERS)
PL»TANf. HETijYCYCLOPtNTANE METHYLCYCLOHEXANE METHYLMETHYLf.NECYCLOPHOPANt CYCLOHEXANE METHYLBUTANOL CYCLDHEXENE HEXAijf; METHYLTHIOPHENE ~ETHYLHEXADlENE
0
J
ANALYTICAL ~ETHODI CME"ISTI •.
REMARK! REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERifIEO BYI TBB
•••REI-IAAKS•••
DATA vr.RIFIED BYI rAM
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A•AVERAGE VALUE •NA•NOT ANALYZED •NAI•INTF.RFF.RENCF.5 ·tJ•f.STIHATED VALUE •N•PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE or PRESENCE or MATERIAL •K•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE GREAT~R THAN VALUE GIVEN ■U•MATEHIAL WAS ANALYZF.D FOR 8UT NOT DETP.CTED, THE NUMBER IS , THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT,
t.,
e
0
I i ..
' I
l -. --
:',APIPLE Jl,UU AUAL'r':c;J:i tlAtlfGl-:111-:11
1-'.Pll•I-:;11, Rf-.<i l Y
A l'H~:us G~:11~G l A
11/01/Bl
SAl•PLf. 110, I 83C35Y2
PHUJECT NO I BJ•2JJQ SOUHC~I pnfTiH 15 PITS
ClT'tl "'!ACII
STATIOII 1,011 EG•I• STUH~T STA'f ON ~01
STAT1-;1 UC
SY!i'l't-.:1
S4MPLE COLL~CTt(1~1 START OATE/TTH~ 09107181 1100 SAHPL~ CG~~~cr1u~1 STUP DAT~/TJMf: U(I/OQ/00
COLLfCJEU BY I SAl'\PLf; Hie:C 1DI SEALill! HS
BRAU WALLACE RECEIVEU rR□M, au,u WALLACE UAIE/TlMK 09/12/83 1150 HEC O RII T HENN~TT
CHEHISTI UGR . ANALYTICAL H•THOUI
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED RYI TRR DATA VERIYIEO BIi DGR
~f-~SULTS IIA
IIA "~ I u II I o U IIIU IOU 10IJ JOU
l llll
JIIU JOU
l 011 IOU lOU
10ll l OU lOU JOU 1 I) IJ
JUU IUU J'OU
JOU IOU IOU
JOU
1 Oil
1 Oll
I l)U
1 0 IJ
!OU IUU IUU
1 IJ 1J
1011 1 tl IJ
111U
JOU
1 Oil IOU
1 OIJ IOU ltlU
J II ll
tUU
100
1 OIi •••FOOTNOTES••• lllU
•A•AVC:RAGE VALUE •1~A•NOT ,'NlJ/tzr.o •NAl•INTEHFtRENC;:S ct·J• ·•J•ESTINATEU VALUE •N•PHESU~PTlV~ EVIDENC~ or PHE5EaCE av MATERIAL IOU •K•ACTUAL VALIJE IS KNUWU TU hE ~~ss THA~ VAl,UE GlVt~ JOU
•L•ACTll~L VALUE IS-~NU~U TO AE GHEAT~H THAU VALUF. GIV£1l JOU •U•HA'!~~IAL WAS ANALYZJ.~O FOR 8IJT UO'l' 1Jt.:TF.C1£D. THE l~IIM.UF.Q tS '\fJlJ THE ~l~JMUM OET~CTJIJH Ll~Il. JUU JOU
20U
UtlJTS IJ(;/f,
IJlj/L llG/L
ll(j/L,
IHilL
IIG / I,
IIG/t, UGIL
111-/L
UG/IJ
LIG/JJ
l!Ci/L IIG/1,
ll(i/1,
IH;/1,
IIG/L ur, 11, UG/L llG/L
lie,/ L llG/L ·-
UG/l.i llG/L
IIG/1, UG/L
I.IG/Li IIGIL IJGIL IIG/1,
IJG/L
IIG/L,
Ill.ill,
llG/L llG/1, llt;IL IIG/1, IJGIL,
IJ1;/L
ll(.jlL
llG/L
IIG/L IIG/L
IJG IL UG/L
llr,/l,
Ur.IL
UGIL
llG/L
lrc;/L u,;11,
llc;IL
IIG/L
llG/L IIG/1, IIC:IL
IIG/l,
UGII,
:-.1 u1h.T
.Hl 4 Jt4 J 4 J 4 b
j" 1,u
J'I :>'lb, J 4':, / l
J-1'.J Jb
J4l/J
J 4 J'Jb
J4 .ii'! j J 4 4 .i ij
J444'1 J-J 1 U".i
H!>!>I
j 4 t, "J b
J4,IH
J41Uli
J4,jdb
J4~1'11
]4,ilJU
J4111~ J -l j .. 1
J 4 ti l l
j 40'4!t,
J·\041
HJ•! J4JJt,
J'\4JJ 1•-n uo
J 4 0 J t,
J '1 'lb I
.t'424U
j IJ .L l U
J4J/b
J4 'lblJ
J4 i'4i J•,nnu
34:,).0
J4J . .W
J 4 0., 1
J4)')t,
J4H7
J 4 -IUJ
·.H~~ti
j4~ l1
J1~Hb
j4)'i1
J <10'J4 J-4 bllb
J4blJ1
J 4 o :.:! l .H<t:,~
J4hlb
j 4 I)~,
J':IUJ .!
J<4o4o
0
• j
()
0
•
' \-...
SAfiPLf; AUU AIJf\l,'tSt$. toAIH•GE,vEt•T S'r'STI=.:'.\
fPA•FSll, ~..:c; JV
A'fHt::t.R ci-:oHG I.A
11/0l/83 £XT~ACTAijL£ OHGA~tc ANALtSts, MtjC
DATA JlEPOHT[IIG SH~~T ~I.TEP.
SAMPLE TYPE1 URK•A
PROJt:CT f.10 I IH-2.JJ(} PtHIGHAJ.t £1Jf.Mt:rnt NSf.'
snuRCE1 pnht-:1-Ps p1·rs StTF: CIT~I MACU STAT(S r1c
STATION I U I KG•IW sruNKT s1lrlo• Nu,
SAMPLE CULLECtI □•1 STAHt OAT~lt!M€ 09/07/Hl 1100 SAM~LE CUl,l.if;C'C llhl t S'l llP llA'r1o;/1't 1,u.~ II0/011/00
COLLlCTED ~YI H~AO WALLAC~ ~~C~lVfD fMO~lf BRAO W~Ll,ACf SAMPLE Rt:C 1llf UATE,/Tl~~ 09/12/ij) 1150 R~c•o Hrl T ~ENN~TT
SEAL~O I )ES
CHl::11151 I ANALiTICAL NETH001
REMAHKI \,.,, kt:1-!AkK I
SAMPLr LUG YE~IFIEO ~YI 1RB OATA VERIFIED BYI OGR
~ .......••.......•.••....•..••.•..•......•...•.....•....••.......
. . ··•••rooruoTES••• •A-AVlPACE VALUE •~A•NtJT ANALYZED •NAl•l~TERFERE'1C~S tJ•ESTlMAT~D VALUE •N•VRESUMPTIVE EV10ENC£ OF P~ESENCE 0~ MAT~RIAL •K•ACTIJAL VALU~ IS KNOWN TO ~E LKss THAN VALUE GIV~N •L•AClUA~ VALUE JS K~UdU TU II~ GREAT~~ ~HAN VALU~ GlV~N •U-MAf~HilL ~AS ANALYZED FOR ijllT t/OT OE1ECTEO. TllE Nll~HEq tS THE Ml~l~U~ OET~CTlfll' J,tMIT. ·
1-a::rnl,TS
~IOJS
•••••ANALY'CtCAL Jn-;SIILTS•••-•
JNI U~/1, CQM~IJIJllD IIA~~ ISllUt:NZOfU~ANOJO~l
' ' ~, !. __
; ...... r
11/01/Bl EXTPACTAHL~ ORGANIC ANALYSJS, ltTSC DAT~ H~PO~'[lllG Stllt;T WA'l'l!:H
SAMPLE NO,I aJCJS~l SAMPLE TYPfl MONWL
PRUJ[CT NO I B.3•2l]Q PRIJCRA~ ~LEMrNTI NSr souHC~1 P1JlrEH 1S PJTS s11~ C 1 l'Y I ►IACU S1'ATF. I UC
STATION 1,011 HW•I STO~£T STAf UN ~UI
SAHPLg cur,L~CTI0•41 START IJATE/TIHE 09/07/R] tlJO SAMPLi;: CULL~;CTJON: STOP llATF./TIMF: llO/fl0/110
CULLEC'f~O bYI BRAI) ~ALL4Cf R~CEJVE~ fHOMI ORAO ~Al,l,ACE SAMPLE HEC 1 lll OATE,/Tl~~ n9/12/B3 1so NECIU I\YI T l\£NNfTT SEALeDt HS
CHt,-1Isr1 DGH ANAL~TJCAL l~E'fHOOI
Rf.MAfll<I kEMAkKI
SAHPLE LOG V~RJFIEO HYI T"H
af:SULT6 1UOOJN
2CJ()Jt,
20tJ~IN
hOJN
20Jll 20Jti
HOJII 50JN 20JII
2tlJU 2HOdN
40Jll
2 0\J ~· 211JU 211,,,,
bUJU
211Jrl
l:lthlfi 2 UJ II 20JN l lHJ,l•i J IIJ rJ 2UJI~ .3UJH
2U,JU
20J1\I
JOJIJ
JOJl4
2U.JN 2U,JN
20.JN 211dl,'
2•1JH 2UJN bO.J,'l
20J~
•
•
;
i
-'
11/01/AJ PiS"flC!OES/PCB•s ANO OTI-IF:H CHLORIIIATF.0 COl4PUIINOS 04.T.\ t(f.PflR'f IrlG SHn:r
\ooATEH
SAMPLE ,,a.a RJC]592
PROJECT io r YJ•2J)Q PROGRAM ~L~ll[NIJ NSf SOUHC~I PUJTEM 1 S Pl1'S sir~ ClT't'I MAC/.) ST~1f:I NC:
STATION l.O I EG•IM sroREt sr•rluN •01
SAMPLE COLLECT!O~I STAHT OATE/TlH~ 09/07/83 1100
SAMPL~ CUl,L~CTl•lNt STOP nATE/'rTH~ IIO/OU/00
COLLEClEO BYI ~RAD •ALLACE R~CEIVEO FROMI 8HAD WALLACE SA•PLE REC'D• u,r11r1•E ~9/12/HJ 1150 REC'D ~YI T ~E•NET1
SEALWI tES
CHEMlSTI HL,R
ANALYTICAL M~TltUlll
REhAHKI
Hf:'.l'\AHK 1.
SAMPLK LOG V~HlFl~D ijYI THB
•••H~HAJ,11<.S•••
DATA VEHIFIEO BVI HLH
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
RESIJIJTS U,UO]IJ O,OUJIJ
0 • 011]11
0,00111 O,OO]IJ
0,00311
O,OtlJIJ
u,00111 U,OUJII
O,OU7IJ U,OU7ll
0.01110
U, OU711
0, OU711
ll, 0 111 O,OJU
0 • tl.3U
0,0'111
U,OllJ 11,0311
0 • 0 311 o.u1u U, UJU
0 1 2ll O,OlU I/ A
•••••JWALW"flCAL 1-<~;t;IJl,"l'S•••••
IHII TS COMPUlltlD tiHHH~l
IJC:/1, ALOHI" j',I j Ju
IIG/L HlP1'ACHJ,ON )9·HU
llG/1, H~;p1'ACHLIJN 1!:PO.<IIJF; 3 Y 4 l I}
IIG/J, ALPHA•hhC j Ii j j'
IJ(;/J, H~TA-~ttC j ',I j j !:I
llt:/J, GMll!A•BIIC (LlUOAl"E) J 'J J •l U
IIG/1, Dt:.:J,IA-1·11/C J4 2:>Y
IIG/L t-;t, l)USli u· A iJ I ( Al,PIIA) J4Jtil
llc;/L OIF:LIJHIN j 'J J1;u
111.i/L 4, 4 1 •Ul>'l' (p,pt .. (Jll'J') J'J Jou
IIG/L 4, 41 00u1a.: (l-',P 1 •1lllt-:J J1.J JJU
llf./L 4,-1•·1wu (P,P'•OIJU) J'JJlU
IHUI, f;t,,lll(It-1 J'J hU
IIC. /1., i::,-;nu::WLFAH 11 (t!C:'J'~) J 4 J :> O
il(j/J, l::1,q)HSULfAh su1,F,\'f~ l q J !) l
UG/L CHLUHOA~I:: (11::Crt. •llXJ·U~I::) / I J'JJ:>U
l)(;/1, PCP.•J 242 (J.IHICl,OH 17.42 J J',H'Jb
IIG/L PCn•ll54 { A~llClslll-i 1 :.! :, 4 } ]'1:>IJ4
IJ(:/L PCP.•1221 ~AN(lCl,OH I 2H l J·Hllli
uc;/11 PCP.•1232 AfH)Cf,llll J ,J 2) JIJ4~2
·Uc;/ L PCR•124ij (AfolCl,ll~ 14!-H! J J!,~Ot)
UG/1, PCl\•1260 (AtHJCl,UH 1 2 ti U J J'i~'Jt,
llG/1, PC•.i• 1 U 1 ti (AHLICLllH I U I b l 34011
IJG/11 TUXAPH1-:h1~ J~4UU
111;/L . fo;t.nl-lIN ALl}F.:HklJE: J4.Hi0'
11G / l, 'J.,30·1,H 1'CUll(UILJXJ'I) J~bl~
UGlt, CHL RIJ~:t.it: /"J. 11 Hfl4 • IIG/L ALPHA•CHl,UPO~tlE /2
ll(;/ L r. AMM l't •f: h 1,0 Ht, F-..:N l-.: l"J
lJr./1, l • H): l>HU X Y CH LUH 11 t:11~: n
IIG/ It G A~t!A •C II IJOHD J, NE n J',tSIU
ll(i/U TH Af'i S • I~ Ut~ AC rl l,UR 12 .l':HJ / l
IJG/1, ALPHA•CHLOHUANE /2 j~J>Jb
UG/1, Cl5•NO•~ACt-tlJU~ n )4VbH ucn HETHUX'iCHLOH J'J4"JU-
)
..)
0
0
.J
0
•
I..
I..,
SAHPLE A~O ANALYSIS MANAGE~~NT SYSTEM EPA•F.:SU,REli 1V ATHENS GEORCIA
10/27/83 SPrc1r1En A"ALYSIS DATA AEPO~T!NG SH(rT SEDl~ENT/SOIL/SLUOGE(ORY WT)
SAMPLE N0,1 BJCJ594 SAMPLE TYPF.1 BOIL
PROJECT •o I BJ 0 fJ3a PROCHAM ELEMENT! NSF SUUHCEI votrER1S PITS SITE CITYI MACO STATE! NC
STATION I U I AH•IS sru»ET srlrluN •01
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 00/08/Rl llOO
6A~PL~ CULL~cr10,11 STOP 0Al~/TJ~~ 00/00/00
COLLECTED RYI SHAO WALLACE RECEIVED FRO~f ~RAD WALLACE SAMPLE REC 1UI DATE/TIME 09/12/83 !ISO REC O SYI T HENNETT S[ALl'.:lll. 'tf.S
CHEHISTI RPL CHEMIST! ANALYTICAL HETHOOI
REMARK!
1.. REMARK I
SAMPLE LUG VERlrIED BYI TBS DATA VERIFIED BYI HAW
\_,, •••REMARKS•••
\..,
\..,
\..,
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A•AVERAGE VALUE •NA•NOT ANALY7.ED •NAI•INTERFERENCEB •J•ESTIMATEU VALUE •N•PHESUHPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PMfSENCE OF MATERIAL •K•ACTUAL VALUE 18 K~OWN TO FE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE CHEATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U•MAToHIAL WAS ANALYZ~D FOR 8UT NOT OETECTEU, THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OETtCTION LIMIT,
6TU1H;T
UUUI
•
•
---.:::,---
....:
10/27/83
SAMPLE ANU ANALYSIS MAN~GEMEUT E~A•F.SlltHF.G IV ATHENS oEORGlA
SPF.CIFIED lNALYSIS
SYSTE11
DATA Hf.PORTING SHEET SEDIHENT/SUIL/SLUDGE(ORY WT)
SAMPLE TYPEI SOIL
PHUJECT NO I 83•23)0 PROGRAM ELEMtNTI NSF suuacr.1 ~olTEH'S PITS SITE
Cl'fYI HACO STATEI HC
STATION !1Dfl AH•IS STURET STAT UN NOi
SAMPLE COLLF.CT!ONI START OATE/T!MF. 09/08/R) !JOO SAMPLE CULLf.CTIUNI STOP DATf./TIHE 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYI BRAD WALLACE RECEIVED FROMf BRAD WALLACE SAMPLE REC'DI DATE/TIME 09/12/83 1150 RECD BYI T BENNETT SEALED! YES
CHEMISTI RPL CHEMIST! ANALYTICAL METHOD!
HEHARKI
1., REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VEHirIED BYI TAB DATA VEHIFIED BYI MAH
\,.., •••PE:~ARl'.S•••
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A•AVERAGE VAiur. •NA•NOT ANALYZED ONAl•INTERFERENCES •J•ESIIHATED VALUE •N•PRESUHPT!VE EVIDENCE or PHESENCE or MATERIAL •K•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO aE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L•ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO AE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U•MATEH!AL WAS-A•ALYZED FOR ~UT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT,
STOHn 007~1
•
•
'--
10/27/83 SP'-Clr!Fn ANALYSIS DATA HEPO~TINC SH~~T SEDIMENT/SUJL/SLUnGECn•Y WT)
SAMPLE N0,1 RJC3595 SANPLE TYPEI SOIL
PROJECT hO I 83•23]0 PROGRAM El,~NENTI NSf SOURCE! POfTERIS PITS SITE c1rr1 ~ACO STATEI NC
STATION IlDII AH•2S STUR~T ST TON NOi
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIM~ 09/08/R3 1330 SAMPL~ CULLECtl □~• STOP OATE/t]M~ 001on100
COLLECTED ijll BRAD WALLAC~ RECEIVED fROMf BRAD WALLACE $AMPLE REC 1 DI UATE/TIME 09/12/83 1150 REC O BYI T BENNETT SEALED! YES ·
CHEMIST! RPL CHEMIST! ANALYTICAL METHOOI
REMARK I REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERifIEU BYI TBB DATA VERIFIED BYI HAW
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• ■A•AYERAGE VALUE ■NA•NOT ANALYZED ■NAl•INTERFERENCES ■J•ESTIHATED VALUE ■N•PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN ro BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN ■L•ACTUAL .VALUE IS ~NOWN TO ~E GR~ATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U•HATEH!AL WAS ANALYZED fOR BUI NOT DETECTED, lHE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIM T,
•••••ANALYTICAL M~SIILIS•••••
UNITS PARAMETER 1 MG/KG CYlNIDE .., STURET oon1
•
•
'--
'--
'--
'--
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSI~ MANAGE~ENT SYSTEM EPA-i:sn ,Rr.G IV A'rll!:Ns uEORGlA
10/27/B) SPFCIFIEO ANALYSIS OATA REPORTING SHEET SEOIHENT/SOIL/SLUOGE(DRY WT)
SAMPLE NO,I 8JC3596 SAMPLE TYPEI SOIL
PHUJECT NO I Bl•2l3Q PROGRAM F.LEMENTI NSF SOURCE! pOfTER'S PITS SITF. Cl'fYI MACO STATEI flC
STATION 1,011 AH•lS STURET STAT ON NU1
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START OATE/TJMF. 09/08/Al 14I~ SAMPLE CULLECTI□

N
a

STOP DATE/TI•E 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYI HRAD WALLACE RECEIV~D FROMf HRAO WALLACE SAMPLE REC 1 D1 DATE/TIME 09/12/Bl 1150 RECD BYI T BENNETT SEALED I HS
CHEMIST! RPL CHEMIST! ANALYTICAL METHOD!
REMARK a REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYI TBB
•••REMARKS•••
DATA VERIFIED BYI MAW
···········································-····················· •••rOOTNOTES••• ■A•AVERAGF. VALUE ■NA•NOT ANALYZED ■NAl•INTF.RFERENCES •J•F.STIHATEO VALUE ■N•PHfSUMPTIVE EVIDENCE or PHESEflCE OF MATERIAL ■K•ACIUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN ■L•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO HE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN ■O•MAJEHIAL WAS ANALYZKD FUR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT,
STIIHET oo7H
•
•
SAMPLE AND ANALY51S MANAGE~EMT SYSTlH t:PA-i:sn,HG 1V HHE"S GEOHGIA
10/27/83 SPF.CIFlf.D ANALYSIS OATA HEPORT[NG 6HEET SEOISENT/SOIL/SLUOGE(ORY WT)
5AHPLE N0,1 R3C3597 SAMPLE TYPEI SOIL
PROJECT NO I 83-2330 PROGRAM ELEMF.NTI NSF SOURCf.l POfTF.R'R PITS SITE CITYI ~ACU STATEI NC
STATION 1,011 AH-4S STORET STAI ON •01
SAHPLE COLLECTIONI START DATE/TIME 09/08/A3 1500 SAMPLF. CULL'.CTIDNI STOP DATE/TIM'. oo,on,oo
COLLECTF.U "YI BRAU ~ALLACE RECEIVED ~RDMI HRAO WALLACE SAMPLf. REC'DI UATE/TIHE 09/12/83 1150 REC'D BYI T BENNETT SEALWI YES
CHEHISTI RPL CHEHISTI ANALYTICAL HETHOOI
REHARK1
HEM ARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYI TBB
•••REMARKS•••
DATA VERIFIED BYI HAW
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTHUTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTF.RfERENCES •J-ESTIHATED VALUE •N-PHHSUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE or MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN ■L-AC1UAL VALUE )S KNQ~N TO RE GHF.ATEH THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MA1EHIAL ••s ANALYz•o FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT,
Rf~~~. UNITS PARA>IETER. 1 ~ MG/KG CUNIOE v
STOR<T oon1
•
•
'--
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-~:sn,~F.:G IV ATHENS GEORGIA
11/17/8] PURGElRL~ OHGANICS ANALYSIS DATA REPOPTING SHt£1 SEDIMENT/SOIL/SLUDGE(ORY WT]
SAMPLE N0,1 8JC3594 SA~PLE TYPEI SOIL
~ )'
PROJECT ■0 1 1 Hl•2ll~ PHOGRAM ELEMENTI NSF SOORCEt Pu· TER 1S PlTS SITF Clf~I ~ACO STATEJ NC
STATION Il"l' AH•IS. ST1JHET SIT ON ~UI
SAHPl,E CULL~CTlONI START DAT~/TlM~ 09/0B/Rl 1)00 SAMPLE CUL~ECl'IIJIJI STOP OAT€/TIM~ 00/00/00
COLLECT~D BYI HHlO WALLACE RECEIVE:D FRD•r BRAD WALLACE SA•PL~ REC'OI OAfE/TIKE 09/12/83 1150 REC'D HYI T a~•NEZT SEALEDI YES
CHE~llST I fRA ANAf,YTICAL kETIIOOI
RE"4ARK I REMAHKt
SAMPLE LOG V~RlfIED RYI TRB
•••~EMARKS•••
SA"PLE DATA VERIFIED BYI FAM
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••F'OO?NOTES•*• ·•A•AVERAGE VALUE ■NA•NUT ANALYZED ■NAl•INTERFEHENCES •J•SSTIMATE□ VALUE •N•PRESIIHPIIVf. EVIDENCE or PR~SEttCE OF HATERIA~ ■K•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNn<N TO RE LESS IMAN VALUt; GIVEN •L•ACIU'L VALUE IS KNUSN TO nE GRsATEH THAN VALUE GIVEN •U•HA'fEriiAL •AS ANALYLEO fOR BIIT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMttl,;R 15 THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT,
•••••ANALYTICA~ MtSULTS•••••
Hf.SULTS UNITS COMPOUNO NA UG/KG ACPUJ,tIN NA IIG/XG ACRYLONIT~JLE lOOOU IIG/KG CIILORUME1HAN~ 3000IJ -IIG/KG RHUMO•ETHANE ]OOOU IIG/KG VINYL CHl,ORIDE JOOOU IJG/•G CHLUROETHANE JOOOU UG/KG METHYLEI/E CHLOHIDE 300011 IJG/~G 1,l•OICHLORUETH~NE JOOOU IIG/KG 111•DlCHLUHUEIIJAN£ JOOOU lJG/KG THAl•S•1,2•01CHLUHU~1H~~E JOOOII UG/KG CHLUROfURM ]OOOU IIG/~G 1,2•0lCHLOHOE1HANl 3000IJ UG/KG lrlil•THICHLOHOlTHA•K JOOOU IIG/KG CARHON T~TRACHLURlOE ]OOOU IJG/KG HRO~OOICHLO~IJH~IHANl JOOOU IIG/l(G 1, 2•UlCHLUROPfHlPA~F: ]OOOU UG/KG TFA•S•l,J•OlCHLIIHUPHUPICI/£ ]OOOU UG/KG TRIClfLOHOttH~~E 300011 IJC,/l<G lH.:r..u;NE ]OOOll 11(./J,;G UI ~I-IOMOCHLUHOHf:THAllF.: JOO OU IIG/lt~r, lf J, 2•fHlCHLflfWE'l'HAl~t: ]00011 / UC/Kr, C S•J 3.;.u1CHLOf'OPtWP1:.:1a; ]0001) UG/KG i-c11L6ROIC1'HYLVINYL £nll,R JOOOU UGIKG BRUMOfORH ]OOOU IIG/KG ILl,1,2•T£TRACHLOHUEtHAN£ ]OOOU IIG/KG T~THACHLUROETHEN£ J'lltnr.:r, 11cnc TOLUENE v JOOOU UG/KG CHLOHORENZE~E lJJILO.U UG/KG l:THYL AENZEt.£ ..J1!00()'-1JG~KG M•XYLE•£ v tg 0_9 g_•,~~~GJ.K.<i"~t ~5ggrE:JH tx_e:01-../
sro1n:t
J41U J 411 tt 344Jl ]441 b J44'1S
HJl4 3 4 4 J t, 34:,04
l44'H 34,os C )4Jld ]4JJ4
J4JU~ ( 342'-J':I J4JJU HoH
340Y7
344'1
J41J7 l4JU9
]4514 J 4 7 IJ 2 J4:, 19 J 4 JIJO
J4>1Y. .H41>:J 344d]
34304
343/4
JOJ:.!U
•
•
C
'--
•••••ANALYTICAL ~~SULTS•••••
RESULTS UH[TS COHPOU~U
11/17/YJ PURG~ARL~ DHGANICS ANALYSIS OATA REPO~Tltl~ SHEET SE □I•ENT/SUILISLUDGECnRY WT)
SAMPLE ~0,1 8JCJ595 SAHPLE TYPE! SOIL
PROJECT ND.r 8l-2]JQ PROG"AM ELE~ENTI NSr SOURCE& pr1rtER 1S Pt·rs SITE
CITYI MACO STATE1 NC
STATION 1,011 AH•2S stuRgt STAT ON ijUI
SA~PLE COLLECTIUNI START PATE/Tl ►~ 09/0RIRJ lllO SAHPL~ CDLL~CTIONI STOP DATE/TIHE 00/00/00
COLLECTED ijfl BRAU WALLACE RECEIVED FROM! BRAD WALLACE SAePLE HEC•n, DAIE/TI•E 09/12/83 1150 RECD BYI T BE•NETT
SEALED I YES
CHEIHST I FHA ANALYTICAL ~ETHODI
REHA~KI REHARKI
SAMPLE LOG VEHlflEU RYI TBB,
•••REMARKS•••
SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BYI FAM
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••r □ot,.,OTE:s••• ·•••AVERAGE VALUE ■NA•NUT AHALYZEO ■NAl•INTERfEH[NCES ■J•£S?l~ATED VALUE ■N•PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL ■K•ACTUAI, VALUE IS KNIJWN TU H• LESS THAN VALUE GIVtN •11•ACT0AL VA~UE IS SNOWN TO HF. GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •u•HATEMIAL ••s ANALYZED FOR ~UT NOT UETECTED, THE NUMHER 1S THK MittINUM DETECTION LIMIT,
NA UC/KG ACRULEIN NA IIGIKG ACHYLUSITRILE
7000U UG/KG CHLORUM~THA~g
700011 IIG/1((; IH<lll"IOl~ETHANE 7000U UG/KG VINYL CHLORIDE
7000IJ IIG/KG CHT~IJRUET11ANl 7000U OG/KG METHYLENE CHLORIUE 70000 UG/KG 1,l•OICHLOHOEIHENE 7000U UC/KG I l•DICMLUNOETHANE · 1ouou uc1KG TkANS•t,i•DICHL□HUEIHEnE 70000 UG/KG CHLOROFORM 70000 UG/KG 1,i•olCHLURUElHANE 7UOOU llG/KG 1,1,t•·r~ICIILUHUETHAN~ 70llOU UGIKG CAH.tWN Tl-.:1RACIH,URIUE 7UOOU UG/KG l:HHIMOOICHLOROMf-;THAt.JE:
70000 IIG/KG 1,:l•DlCHLUHOPkllr'ANJ-; 7000U UG/~G TRANS•l,l•U!CHLUHUPRUP~NE 7ooou IJG/KG THICHLOHOETH~NE ,noou IIG/KO HKNZErl~ 7000U IIGIKG UIUROMOCHLOHOM~THAN~ · 10000 ttG/~r, 1 I 1, 2•THICHL □tt110THA••~ 70000 IIG/KG C 8•1(J•UICHLURU~RDP~N~ 1000U UG/KG 2•CHLlROETHYLVINYL llHKH 7UOOU 11G/KG BROMot·OMM 70000 UG/KG 1,11 2,2•TETRACHLOROETHANI
looou UG/KG TKTHACHLOROETHKNI
5000-UGIK{l-rlOLU!OIIE >I ooou-~·uc1KG -CHLiORuei::N2.ErJE , -. .1-110.D\1 IIG/KG ETHY4 ,B~i!l:ENf.~' · (,5oui.lo,:;._.;q;_,nq,.lf•XlLEIIE:::., >I , (i;ann·.,-uGt~"'CJ&P•XYUEflErMJXCll11 ,{ 49__,. I ... MOlSTURo ·· .. . . .
510kt.T J4JI)
l 4 4! 11:f J4iJ1 J441b
J 14 '1 ~
J4Jl4
J44Jb J4~U4
J44~~ ]454~
J4Jlij
34' j4 )4~U9
J4 2'JIJ
J4JJU 34,44
J4b'17 J44M7
H2J"/
]4JU'J J4 o 14 ]4 )0J 34> I~ 34'<0
J4Jl"J ]44 I 8
344·· J4 3 J4JI
70J.i!U
•
'-
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS ~ANAC~liENT SY6TEM tPA•f:sn,RtG IV ATHF-NS GEORGIA
11/17/83 PURGEAALE ORG-NICS ANALYSIS DATA RFPll~Tl~G SHEET SEDIMfNT/SUIL/SLIIOGE(DRY WI)
SA~PL£ NO.I 8lC)596 SAMPLE TYPgl SOIL
PRUJ~CT NO.I Y1•2Jl0 PRUCRAM ELtME~TI NSF SUU~Cfl POTTER'S PllS SlT~ ClTYI MACO STATE! NC
STATIOS I 1Dfl AH•lS STOHfT STAT~~ NOi
SAMPLE COLLgc·r10~1 START DATt/TIM~ 09/0R/8] 1415 SAr<!PLE CULU.:CT [1JN I STOP DATE/Tl HF. 00/00/00
CULL~CIED BYI 8RAO WALLAC~ RECEIVED FROHf BAAO WALLACK SAMPLE REC 1DI DAii/TIME 09/12/Bl 1150 REC O HYI T BKSNKTT S£At,€DI YES
CHEMIST! f~A ANALITlCAL HETHOUI
).!£HARK I R£MAkK I
SA<PLE LOG VERIFIED BYI T~H
•••R£"4ARKS•••
SA~PLE DATA VERIFIED BYI FAM
·······························~································ •••ronrNOTC:s•••
•••••AhALYTICAL R~SIILTS•••••
RESULTS UNITS COMPOUND
NA llG/K~ ACROLtlN NA IIG/KG ACHYLOSITHILE 5000U 1JG/KG CHLURUM~THA~~ 500011 IIG/l<G BRUHOH£YHANt:: 500t1U -IIG/KG VINYL CHLO~lO~ SOOOU UG/KG CHLOAOEIHANE 51l011U UG/KG METHYLEU~ CHf,URIDE
SOOOU IIG/KG 1,l•OlCHLOHOETIIENE: SOOOU UG/KG 1,l•OlCH~OHO~TIIANE SOOUU IIG/KG THANS•l6i•DlCHLURUP.THENE 50000 UG/KC C!lLOHOr RM
5000IJ 11~/KG 1,2•UlCHLOHOEIJtAl'E 5000U 11~/KG 1rl,t•TH1CHLIJHOETHANE ~ooou IJG/KG CAHHUN TETHACIILUHlOl 500UU 11,:nui BHUMIJOICHLOHOHf;THJlNl SOOOU IIG/KG 1,~•DlCHLUROPaUPA>•
5 OCJOIJ IIG 1KG THAti8• 1, J•UlCHLOHOPRUPt:ta:: 5000U flG/KG TRlCHLORUETH~tlE 5<100U IIG/KG HENZENE
!:,00011 IIG/KG DlHl·Hll-ll'JCHLfJROMETHANE
sooou ~g~tg ~il!f·I~~~~~~C~5J:t~~Nl ~ggsu IIG/KG i-CHL6AOE1HYLVIU1L EtH•R
5000U UG/KG BHO~OfOHM SUO.OU .. IIG./KG. lf1t2,2•TETHACH~CIHU~IHAN~
cirt~gw~~g~~aluA~~~l~O•Th!:IIK
~,
0i~LJ~~lt~~~~~~.,U~~.,, ' ~ffa~~ctrat~!~i~~~';;Tihpu > v 2 1c-~MOISTURE ·~-·"
'■A•AV[RAGE VALUE ••A••or JNALYZED •NAI•INTERFERENCES •J•ESTIMATEU VALUE •N•PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE or PRESF,NCE or ~ATf.RIAL •K•ACIUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TD RE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L•ACIUAL VALUE 15 KNDWN rn BE GA[AT[~ THA• VALUE GIVEN •U•MjTERIAL ~AS ANALYZ~D FOR AUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMHER IS THE MJNIMUM DETECTION LlMIT 1
70J:.!U
•
1111'/83 PURG~lRL~ O~CTANtCS ANALYSIS ~ATA qFPOHTlNG SHE~T SEOIS~NT/SOJL/SLUOGE(DRY ST)
SAMPLE N0,1 R3C3597 SAMPLE TYPEI SOIL
PRUJICT NO I 83•2JJO PROGR•M ELEMENT! NSf suu•ci1 •olr1••s PITS SIT< CITYI M.lCO STATP.I NC
STATION 1,011 Ah•4S STURET S1AT ON NUI
SAMPLf CULL~CTlONI STJRT OAT~/TTM£ 09/08/AJ 1500 SAMPLE COLL~CTlO~I STUP OATE/TJ~E 110/00/00
COLLECTED BYI BHAD •ALLACE RECEIVED FROMf RRAD WALLACE SAePLE REC 1DI DATE/TIME U9/l2/8J 1150 RECD HYI T H~NNETT Sf.ALE:lll YES
CHl::~lSTI FHA ANAf,YTICAL ~ETHOOI
REMARK I RE,i,iAl-fK I
SAtlPLF LOG VERirlED BYI T~U
•••REMARKS•••
SASPLE DATA VERIFIED BYI FAM
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••fUOTllllTER••• ·•A•AV[HAGE YALU!=: ••U•NOT •NALYZF.O •rUl•HlU:FIFERENCF.s •J•fSTIMATEO VALUE ·••PRESU•PTIVE EVIUENCE or PR~SFNCE or MATERIAL •K•ACTUAL VALUE IS IPIIJio.N TO ~E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L•ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNUWH TO RE GHEATE~ THAN VALUE GIVKN ■U•HIIERIAL SAS ANALYZED f□R "UT NOi OETECTEU, THE NUMBER IS THE ~l»lMU~ DETECTION Ll 111T,
Rr.6ULT6 UNITS CnMPOUNO ~A IIG/KG ACH(l(,ElN HA IIC./KC. ACRYLUfJlTHILE 6U UG/KG CHLOlfO~ETHAN~ blJ 11~/KG HROMOMETHANE 611 11(:/l<G VINYL CHLURlUE 6IJ IIG/KG CHLDHUETJlA14E bU IIG/KG METHYLENE CHLORIDE 6U IJG/KG t,l•DICHLOROEtH~h~ b1J IIG/KG 1,l•DlCHLONOETHAhE 6U IIG/KG TRANS•l 62.UICHLORUET"f:NE 61J IIG/KG CHLUROF k~ 6IJ IIG/KG t,2•DJCHLURUETHANI:; OU IIG/~G !111l•T"ICHLO"OSTHl"S bl! IIG/KG CARtHlN TETHAClll,UHlfll bU llC./KG Hfl:IJMOUlC!ILOHUMl::l'llAtlf; 611 IIG/KG l11•U!CHLURUPHOPINE 611 IJG/~G THAN5•1,J•D1CJILURUPHUP~NE 6U IIG/~G TRICHL□HOETH~NE 611 · IIG/KG 8£f.tZENE 611 IIG/~~ UIRHOMOCHJ,UkUHEl'HAijE ~:: ::g~~g ~l~~f ;l~l~~~~~~i~;LJM~tH~ bU IIG/KG 2•CHLUH0~TI-IYLVINYL l'J'lll-.H 611 IIG/KG BROMUfUkM 6U IIG/KG 1,1,2;2•TETHACHLUROETHANE
•
61;§' · IIG./KG •r,;1'HI HLOHOETHEN~; 6·• 30f:1! UG7f!;'GT-TULtft !:I "' h-U IIGIK*;f~~ORQ6fl!ZEN~
ft; , . ~. ,Mf~~'fl~~g~~~H!~~f~'] 'lj MOISTUHt: J-.~ 7UJ:i'O
t.
C
ll/01/Bl
SAi'l'l,E ANII /\U/\LtS t.'i ~'At."/ll:E11f,;,q S'c'S,.i':n
f.PA-ESU,Hf.<i IV ATHl:::tJS Gi':QHGIA
SJHPLE NU.I A)C)594 SAMPLE TYP~I SIJIL
PROJECT /110 I HJ•7.JJO JJI-HJG'U\t.1 r,1,r.111•:tJ'fl NSF
SIJUHCt1 Pflf1't-;k 1 S PITS Sl'(J::
'-ClTYI ~IACO ~TAT ►:1 HC
.....
'--
STAtlnN 1,011 •H•\S STURET 51•1 UN NUI
SAMPLE COLLECTJUNt STANT nATE/Tl~~ 09/08/Al 1300 SAMPLE CUl,LECil(l~I STOP OAJ~1·r1•1~ no,ou,oo
COLLECTED ~YI ~RAO SALLAC~ MECEIV~D fRDNI BRAO ~ALLACE SAMPLE R~C•01 UA1E/TIME 09/12/BJ 11~0 REC'D Bil T RK"NET1 SEA LEO I YES
CHEMIST! OGR ANALYTICAL METhOOI
REMARK! REMARK I
SAMPLE LUG V~RIPIED HYI rn~
•••REMAHi<.S•••
~ ...•••..•...........•••••.•.•....................•..•...........
. •A-AV~RAGE VALUE •~A-HOT ANALYZED •NAI-lNT~RFEREAc•s 1
----•••FOOTNOTES••• . .. --. . . . .
~1. •J•[STIMATEO YALU£ •N•PH~SU~PtJVI::: EVIDENCE Of PH!SENC€ U~ MATtPIAL I •K•ACtllAL VAJJUE 1S KNUHN ro PE LESS THAN VALUE GIVrN ' •L•ACfUAL·VALUE IS KUUWll TO liE GREATER ~H,N VALU~ Gll[N *U•MATEkIAL ~AS •~ALYZ~O FUH ~lit NOT O£TECT~U. THE NUl"''~H IS \.., IHI:: 1<11f'1MUM OETF;CTlUN Ll~llT,
\..,
HESIJl,TS
NA ... ,,. suoou SUUJ
~•JtJOU souuu suuuu 5UUOU sooou SOIJOU suoou
5UOlllJ ~OUJ 50U1Jll
5110\lll
500110
SUUUIJ suaou snonu 50LIUU . sauuu ,;ooou
5001111 500,J
50U1)U sooou 50UOU soonu 700,1 suu.1
5UUOIJ SOOJ
700J sounu
500011 500,J
'/ IJU,1 souuu sooou
5UUJ
500J 5000U
5UOVU sooou
5000U ~uoou suoou
!:>OOUU
5000lJ souuu 5000U
bOOllll snonu souou
5ll00U
ll
•••••t..NAL(1 IC/\J, H~.:.-iULl:i••••-
UNJTS UGIKG uc;tKr.
IIG/t<C.
lJG/li..G
IIG/1\G
IIG/i\G llG/KG
ll(i /1(,.r,
IIG/K.G IJG/KG IJG/KG IIG/t<.G
tl(j / r< (j
1/f,/KG IIG/KG
lJG/rC;G
IIG/KG
IIG/hG uc;/KG u1;/r<G
IJii/Kfi
lll:IK.fj IIG/KG UG/l<G
11'1/KG llli/KG llG/KG IIGIKG ttri/t<G
111;/KG IJ(j / K<;
ll<j/KG
ll<:IKG
llG/1\G
UG/1\G Ul;/1(".C:
IIG/1>;G 11,:,,.;1;
IIGIKG IIG/1\G Uli/KG
IIG/l'G
lHilK.G
llG/KG ll (;/KG
llGIKG
IIG/1\G
UG/KG IIG/KG UG/t-G UG/KG IIG/KG llG/1<,<,
IICi/i'I.G IIG/KG
LJG/KG UGUG
'
::, frJMr..'J
J 4 ~ 'f 1 J 4 J 'f 'J
J"il i 1 J 4:),, '.f
H::> '°' j 4 !) j IJ
HJ. lt1
j 4 j 'J<J
J4Jt10 J 4 'i J 1
J 4 ~:JU
J 'J I tJ ':,
j4'.:,~4 ) ,1 -i q:,
J 4 .i., I
J•H111 J 1 J t1 'II J1::>H4
J4:l1JJ
J q "4 u ti J 1 j q 4
Hol 4
j -4:,' :II j-tti•l4
H Jt1'1 J q j j !,' J-l'·U· j 'II 7 lJ
jQOj
J44">'t J4 J LJ
J'-111 2
J4J I "J
j q 'f / 2
J 4:J~'.:>
J 'J 1 u ;,i
j q::, :c! Sf
J q j' J
j q h j 't
J'f::>'JIJ
J42::>0
J 4'tllb
J 4 ::,::,l.j
J 14':,",t4
Jq::, H'J
3 q::, 'J 4 J 4 b 'J !)
J4bU'J
J40U4
JH:i'f
J44::>~
:Hbl'J
J4tl0U J'JOb·· .i-lb-l
"/ 'I J 'J..
ll/0l/8J EXTHACTAHJ,r CIRGA~IC ANALYSIS DATA ~~POHl'l~G SH~ET :;Eu I l~f.~T I s,111, /Sl,unGJo: ( l}f,t Y W'f)
SA~PLE NU.I RlCJ59S 5A"PLE IIPEI SUIL
P~OJECT NO I ~J-2330 PRrJGfflM ~L~~F~1: NSi' SOUkCEI PUfT~M•s PITS sir~ ClTYI MACO SHTEI r:c
STATION 1 10 0 1 AH•2S STUHET STA1!0N NOi
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATR/TJMr 09/0R/Rl IJlO SA~PLE CULLfC"£IUN: STOP 0~1~/Ttt·~ 110/00/00
CULL~CTED BYI HRAO WALLlC~ RECE[V~D fAO~I ORAU AALLAC~ SAMPLE HEC 1DJ 0~1~/11M~ 09/12/83 llSO REC'D R¥1 r 0~1N~T1 SEALEDI YlS
CHt:MISTI DGR ANALYTICAL ~ETHQOI
RF.HARi< I Ht:1-1AHK I
SAMPLE LOG VEHJFJED BIi TBH
•••Rl::MAR,.;S•••
OATA VERifitU AYI DC.R
R~SULTS
IIA NA NA
4HOOOU 1oouo~1
4ft000U
4~1,)UIJIJ
4800011 4BOOOU
480000
4iWOOU
4/JOUOU
4000011
4Mll0UiJ
,4HUUOIJ
HIOUUIJ 4800011
'-11300011
41j0lJOIJ
41:l\)tlUIJ 411nnu1,-4.qooo11
4800UIJ 1801JIJI.I 480UUII
4~0UUIJ
4HOOUU
4ijUOOIJ
4H00UIJ
480000 4HOllCJIJ 4BOUUIJ
4tltJUOU 48000U 4800011
4BOOOIJ 48UOOtJ 4800011
41:tUUOU
4l:IOUUII 48000IJ
41:WOO\J 48UIHIIJ
41l00UII
4l:IODIJH 4 80tl01J
4HlJIJ0II
41:WU0U
4!::IOIIOU SOOOJ 4HUUOIJ
4HOUOII 4HOUUll
19000011 14000UU
140U0IJU
Y6UOOU
49
UNITS UGIKG
llG/KG
UG/KG IJG/KG
Uli/KG IIG/1\G IIG/KG
IIG/l<G
IJG/KG tl(j/KG
llG/tl.G IJG/KG
IJG/KG
llGh,C.
llt.i/J<G
Uf./1\G llli/KG
IIG/KG
lllj/KG
IIG/KG llG/i<r,
111;/Kr,
IIG/KG
ll(i/KG IJGIKG IIC.11\G
UG/1\G
llG/KG
IJ(j/l((j
U(;/t<G
IIG/1\(j
ll<i/KG ·· UG/KG UGIKG llG/KG
IIG/KG
UG/r:G
11<;/KG
ltGtl\r. IIG/KG
IJ(,/;,.:r.
IIG/J<G
IIG/1\G IIG/KG
IIGIKG llt,;/KG
JIC./t<r,
IIGIKG
llG/ I\G 11(;/KG 11c:1 KG
llt:IKG
IIG/KG
IIG/KG
IIG/.KG
tlC;/J\G UG/K~
'
~'Jl)Ht.l
J4i4l
j" J 4 'l
Hl'l J ~ t,,., ~
Joi~ 14
H~Jl:i J4.llb
J 4 J J~
J4 l!io
J4 'i H
J41::>U J~IUS J ~., !, 4 J 4 i ·1 t,
Hi~ I J•H 1 J
Jof.h'i
j'I ~~ 4
J" lUJ
Jl.lltid
t 4 .i 'I°' J <I 0 l ·I
j 'I b .l 'J J'lt>•H
j q j ,t ..
.3 4 jJ~
J'l'IJ. 3~·1 ll
j 'i I) j
J 'I,·~ h 4
J 4 2 l J J 'J l 1 2
.HJ l'J
J 'I"' I 'J J<l t''1!,
J 'i l u 2 J<l:l J'1
j" J .l J
JiloJ4 t 4 ~'.I~
.;I, -·· ''
__ ,
I
11/01/8]
SA~PL€ ~0,1 HJCJ597 SA"PLE TYPE! SOJL
PHOJECT h0,.1 ill•2l3lJ P~UG~,114 1-:J.,f.llff•TI NSJ.' SUURCfl PUfTtR 1 S PllS sr·rt CITII MACO STATEI SC
STATION l,UII AH•4S STURET STAT UN NOi
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START OATE/TIMF 09/0A/Bl 1500 $A~PLf CULLECTlUNI STOP OA1E/TJM~ II0/011/00
J cuLLECTED ~11 HRAD WALLACE H~CETvEn FROHf HHAD WALLAC~
1 SAMPLE REC'DI UATE/TIME 09/12/HJ 1150 HEC D e11 T HENN~TT r-· SEALED I YES
' CHE~11S'l: IJ\JH AIIALYTlCAL M[Tij001
REMAR~I
Hl=:MAHK.1
SAMPLE LUG VERIFIEO HYI THB f1ATA v~~[FIED 0Ya DGP
RESULTS IIA NA NA 5000U
5tlUIIU
500011
5000U !JOUOU soonu 5001111 suoou
5001111 ~unou
5U01lll sooou suuou
500UU ~ooou
500UU
50UIJIJ
!;iUUIJU
~O(HJU souou sooou soouu
500011 souou 500011
5UOIIU
SfllJIJU
511UUU
5000U sooou
!,00ULi
500011
SOOOIJ !:,OOOll
50UOII
50000 ~uuuu souou
50UIJU
500UU 5000U souou 50001!
500110 souou suuou suoou snoou snonu
50UOU
bbOIJO !'>OUIIU 5UOOU sooou
l7
U>I ltS llG/KG !JG/KG
IIC,/t<.i,
IIG/t<G
llc:/KG UG/KG IIG/KG IJCj/KG
UCi/KG IIG/KG llG/KG llG/t<G IIG/l(G
llCi/KCi
IIG/KG
UG/1\G
11 GI I\Ci IIG/'K<i UG/KG -llG/1(.G
IJG/KO
IICi/Kr.
IIG/1'.G U(i/1\G
IJG/KG 11c:1KG
11c;/fl..G
IIG/KG
lfG/KG
llG/KG IJG/KC:
UG/KG
11(.j/l< G
UG/f'iG
111;/KG
ll{j/J(t;
IIG/1'-G IIG/KG
IIG/KG
IJG/1\G
IJG/KG
UG/KG
llG/KG
IIG/i<G
Uf./KG
UG/KC. tlGIKCi
UG/KG UG/KG
IJG/KG IIG/KG UG/KG
llG/KG
IH;/KG UG/KG
UG/i<G llG/KG
'
:,1 u,n:r
J44<il
J4J4Y
J Y l 'i 1-
.31!:1!'1'::I
J,1::,14
J4:iJ'J
j 1/,' / b JI/, J'l'::I J<i,tlb
JHJI J•M:!U 3',l"/Ut,
Joi t,::,4
J 4 -1 '4 ti,
J-.:u1
j 'I 't 1 l J 4 J lj IJ
J1:>H4
.H2UJ
J•Ut,d
j 4 j 4 'I
J 4 i, l <i
J'lh,.;:I
J4tJ'l'i
J4.HH J4JJY
3" 'tJO JtU•J l
]qt,-'"
j44t,4
J <t l l 3
JIJ 112
j 4 J '!:I
J q .. '2 J'-IJ'jt,
J '-J 1 u i
J<1::>l~
J4jJJ
.HoJ4 j4t,'l!:I
f4 ·,:io
]4~Ub 3 '1 :,::, 'j
J4:>.l4 J q:, tj 'J
J 4 t, '14
.Utl'I~
JloU'l
.HbU4
:J-4 'J '4 J4 4::,t,
J 4 bl 'J J••or,O J':h.l!J 1
.J 4 I) ... 'j
/UJJU
,;
C,
0
•
l,
0
g
• -
ll/01/BJ ~XTRACTAflL~ n~~AttJC ANALYSl6 DATA H[f•o~r11~ SH~t:r sr;:01,.t►:nr1s1JJ1,/Sl,IJIJGE.(llriY h'I)
SAH~LE uo,1 BJCJ59B SAHPLI:: l'YPE I SOIJ,
PHO,lECT NO I BJ-23)0 PQIICR.\"1 F.:1,F.Hf.lHI ,,sr SOUHCEI pnfrE~•s Pl1S SITE
c1rr1 M>.CU .5TATF.:r '.JC
STAtlnU 1 U I AH•SS sruHET s1lrfoN •u1
SAMPLF COl,L~cr1n•1 ST~RT OAT~/TT•~ OQ/08/BJ 1520 SA~PL~ CU~L~:criv~I 51UP 1)41~/TlH~ CI0/01)/1)0
COLLlCl"EU HYI ltRAO ~ALtAC~: ~KC~Iv~o FHU141 BRAD ~ALLACE SA~PLK HlC 11ll OAT~/·r1~1£ 119/12/H) 1150 RECIO BYI T ~E~IJrTT SEALoO I tf.S
CHE•HSTI nt;H ANALIIICAL HEIHOUI
REMAHKI REMARK I
SAMPL~ LUG VEHIFIEU RYt fRR
•••REMARKS•••
JlATA V~PIFIEO BYI DGA
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
HF:SULTS
NA
I/ A
I/A JBOOOIJ
10tllllhl
HtUIIOI/ J~OUUII
JRUIJOIJ
.)HUIIUII 3AUOOII
3HUIJ0IJ 3800011
.HlllO(JIJ
'10UOJ
31:1011011 J 80UUII
JHOIIUII JHOllOU JQOOOII )IH\0011
Jt:IUlll1II
JHIIOOII
.31:JUOOIJ
JHOOOII lHUUUtl
Jf!OUOII JHUIJ(\11
11:lUOUII
JHUIIOIJ
.HWUOII
.3tWUUIJ
HIOOUIJ JHOOOII
3800011
]HUUllll
JHUOUIJ
31:lOOUII
PiOOIIII
.HilltJOII JHOOOU
JHOOOIJ l8000U
JROUUIJ
J,;IOUU\I
31:lUOOII .380 1lU\I
31:lOOOIJ JHOOOU 3800011
JHUtJOIJ
31:iOIJOlJ
31100011
3/1011UU
l50000U
1\UUOIJU 11onuou 7601JOIJ
bb
UJIITS
IHi/K(j
11<.:/KG
IIGIKG t1r.111 G
IIG/l<CI IIG/KG
IJG/ i,;c;
IIG/t<C: uc;tKr.
IIG/t\G
UG/l<G IIG/~G
IIG/KG
IHi/Kr,
llr,/KG
IIG/KG ur.n<c; IIG/KG IIG/KG
11(,/1<.(i
IJlj/~G
U<,ll<r. ll{i/KC.
IIG/K'i IIG/KG 11(;/KG
IIG/ti.G UG/KG
Ut;/kG
llc;/KG
U(i/KG
UG/Kr. IJGIKG
l.lG/KG
IIG/1\G
llt,/KG
llG/KG
LIC:/KG
UG/KC.
IJG/KG UG/1\Ci
llr,IKG 11(,/t<C:
I/Gil'\(;
IIG/1\G
IIG/KG
IJG/1',.G UG/KG IIG/~G
IIG/KG
IIG/KI,
llG/KG
11c:/K<i
IIG/KG
11<,;/KG
IJC;/,<.G
UG/Kt;
'
;; friHl'.T J4441 J 4 j., '1 J '11 :1. l
j 4:, h !,
J 1:, ' .. J4~jlJ
J 4 .! I f'J
j 4 j 'J 'J
J4,i~b
J•H J 1
J4'1~U 3'1/11~
J 4:,:, 4
J 4 4 qt,
J 4 :t ;j I
J 4 4 l 1
J 4 J ti 1J H~•4
J ,j .! u J J 4 JU d J4J~4
J4b14
J -1 b t'J
J1t>4-i
j4Jdi
j 4 J J 'J
J 4 ,j Jb ] '-J ., 111
J <lb J'J
J 4 q O .j
J 1\2 J.J
3 '11 1 4!
.HJIIJ J 4 't / 2 J4;p1t,
J~1U4!
3 '1 ~ l 'J
.H.UJ
Jqu.H
j 1:, 'J IJ
J4"J~(J
J44Ut:1
J 't!>:, ~
J<.it>:.!4
J4!Jd9
.J4t>'i4
)4t:IIJ~ J q t:IU:l
J40U4
J4o4!4 J 41,1:,:;
J 4 o l !:f J'1h00
J 'J\Jt) 1
J'l'>'I !i
JUJJU
C
•
C
Q
•
\...
\....· i
~
'--
' -
j.
'--
'--
'--
I
'--i I ,.
'--
;
I -I \---··
' '--I I ':
'--
11/01/91 ~XTRACTARL~ OPG~NIC ANAJ,YSIS, Mt6C IJATA Ui-:JJOIHJtlr, SIIE:E'! 5 E:n {t\£/1,T I sot LI Sf,lll)Gl::C llHY ~'f)
SAHPLE NO,I R]CJ594 SAHPLE TYPEI ROIL
PROJEc·r NII.I ij]•73]Q PROGRAM F:LE~lf/1,TJ usr SUUij(l::1 JJtJTT~H 1S F11·5 SITK ClIYI 11ACO STATE1 IIC
STATION 1,011 AH•IS STUR~T S1'AI 0/1, ~01
SAHPLE COLLFCTJO~r ST~RT r1AT£/Tl~~ 119/Qij/Rl tlOO SA/IPJ,i;: ClH,Ll::CIJ()r~1 STOP IIATl~/TTI-I~: 110/00/0U
C □LLECT~O HY1 BkAU ~ALLAC~ P~CEIVfD fHOMI BHAO W4JjLACE SAMPLE H~c•o, OAT~,/TlME 09/12/Y] 115G REC'U BY; T flE'!h~TT SEALt.:01 n;s
CH~~ISTI ANALYTICAL M~THDDI
REHAHK1
REHAHKJ
6AMPLf LOG VERIFIFD BYI TRB
HF:SIII/fS
S(IOOJt~
5000JN
51lUtlllf'
5U00dl-l
~OOOJN
5hOll.1H
~UOOJtl
5000Jfl 5000.,,~
70UOlJIJ
lllOllOJU
SIIOOJfl
!:illllOdi'
~~00/llJ,Hl
N
•
•
'--
SMH-'U.: Arm AIIAl,YS [S '-IA~/IG~"1f-:UT SYSTI:':•"
rPh•l<Sll, !'F.G JV /1.THl-,:NS GF'.ORGlA
11/01183
SA~PLE ~O.t A3ClS9S SAMPLE TYP€1 SUll,
PfiOJECl ~0[1 83•1J]Q PRO~llA~ ~1,KMfllTI NSF
SU~MCEI PU TEH 1S PlTS Slf~ ClJ'tl lolaACU STATl-:1 NC
STATION 1,u1, AH•2S STOMET STAf Uij NOi
SAMPLE CULLECTIO~I START O~T~/TJ~E 09/0H/Bl 1)30 SAHPL~ CULL~CTlOhl SlUP nAT~/11~~ 00/0ll/00
COLLECTED qyl H~AO WALLAC~ R~CEIVEU FRO~I HRAI) ~ALl,ACF: SAMPLl R~C 1D1 UAT~,/T!IIK 1)9/12/Rj 1150 ~EC 10 ~YI T A~NN~TT SlALEDI ~ES
CHt:SlSTI ANALYTICAL HETliOUI
REMARK I REMARK I
SAMPLt: LUG VERlflt:D BYI T~B
~P.SUl,'fS
80000,JN
60000,JN t IJlJOOUJ,1
70ll00llJII
~OUO{I.JN
.H:+ObJH 90UOIHIJ~I
l~I UG/K~ CU~PllUrllJ NAME
H ~;y HY 1,P H ~:NU L
Mf:Tt~Y I, I ttnou: l)OOf:CANU!C ACIIJ T~TN~ll~CAiJIJlC ACII> p£:~1'ALH:l:Ar•flll: AClll
HF'.X/IUEC;AIIIJ IC AC Ill UC1'AIJF:CAaUIC ~ClU
•
•
•
~
'--
'--
'--
'--
I_,
I_,
I_,
'--I I
\.....1: I .
.__,,
·~
11/01/8)
SAMPL~ NO,I BJCJ59~ SAMPL! IYP~J SOIL
pRUJ[CT No,, Rl•ll)Q ppU~Rn~ ~LE•r~1, "S' SUURC~I PU1TlH 1S PITS SIT~ CllYI MACIJ STA1~1 HC
STATIUN I U I AH•lS srUHE.T s1lr!un •01
SAHPL~ C(Jf,L~CTll)NI START oa·r~/TJ~~ 09/08/Rl 1415 SAM~'L~ CULLt:c·r11•~1 51'[1P OAT~/rJ~~ (l0/00/00
COLLECTED 8YI BRAD WALLAC~ R~C€IVKO fNOfll BNAD w~L[,ACF SAMPLl ~EC 1DS DAT~,/1!ME 09/12/ij] 1150 R~c•D H~I T ~~,,~~:tr SEAi,~() I H:S
CHE•ISTI ANALY1ICAL ~ETHOOI
REM~R~1 REHARKI
SAHPL~ LOG ViHlFIED ~YI T~A
•••Rl::MAIH(S•••
Nr-~S111,'fS
2UOOO,JN
70UOU,JN
1 OUIIU,Jrl
10000,JN
30000,)N
20000.JN I 0000,JIJ 1 IIOfll,J~
I 000011'1 10000,JN
4~000,IN
·500110Jt1
1 F,-tOli,PI
···••AN11,LY1·rcAI., 1-·►::;1,LT~•····
lttl UG/KG CUMPUU~U ~AM~ Cl jl,KYLB~NZt~E (l lSU~~HSJ C4 Af,KyJ,flJ:.;1~it,:NF. (b 1:-if//~f'-~~ J CS Al,!tyl,ilf-:rJZt;rH~ (2 !.SWU,HSJ MtTll'fLSTYHf.t-iE MKlHYli~A~HIHAL~~~ (2 !SU~~HS) C2 ~LKYl,NAPH1'HALl~E (4 l~Oil~~~) Cl ALKYLNAPHIHAL~Nt (J !~Ut:~H~J D l fl E rJ Zn F LI HAN HlTHYLnl~lNZOYUHhl, TETRAD,,CA•OIC ACIU HKXADECA"UIC ACIU UCTADECA"LJIC AC!U 4 IJtilllF:fJfH'H;O CllrAPIJtltlllS
•
•
'--
' ' \..,:
11/01/B] EXTRACTA~J.£ ORGAflJC At1ALY515, MISC DATA R~PO~TING SH~~1 s~o1~1r-:t1T/SlllL/Sl,llOC.E(OHY ~T)
SAMPLE 00,1 RJCl597 SAMPLE TYPEI SDIL
PRUJlCT NO I BJ•2J]n PRUG~•-,,,EM•"'' ijSr souac,, Pulr~••s •11s str• CltYI MACO ST~1·r1 flC
STATION t,U I AH•4S sroa,r s1.rlu• •□•
SAHPL~ CULLVCTJUNI START l>AT~/Tt~~ OQ/OB/03 1500 SAMPL~ CULL~c·r10H1 STOP ll~TE/TJMf 110/00/0U
COLLECTEU tlYI S~AD ~ALJ,ACr . RECEIVED FRIJNI H~An WALl,ACf SAMPL.f Rr..c•ua OATl::,/Tll-'E 09/12/BJ 1150 REC D HYI .T Rf'.Nllt,;TT 5EAL£01 YES
CHE~us·r I ANALYTlCAI, H~THOUI
~tt•U~KI REMARK I
SAMPLE LOG V~RIFlEU ijYI TRO
•••Wt-.:MARKS•••
IJATl VERlFlEI) OY: OGR
kF:SIILTS
5U0IJJU
1 UOOIIJU
500f)J1J
20000,l'l
•
C
C
t
C
'--
I..,
I
I..,
\.
11/01/8) £XTPACTART,£ OH~AriIC A~ALY5JS, MISC UATA HfPUHTlt:G SH~~T SEDPIF:Wf/!iOll,/SJ,llf\C.l::(OIH' w·t)
SAHPLE ltP~I S11JI,
PNUJECT ~fl I RJ•2J3~ PRIJGRAM ELE1t~1,r1 NSF SUU~CEa p11·J-r1::t-1 1s 1>1rs StTf. CJT'il HACU ST~Tt::: tlC
STATIO" IO I AH•5S STUMET srlTlu• ,u,
SANPL~ CUl,LfCl'IUNI StART DATl/TTM! 09/0H/~J 15~0 SAtlPLf CUl,Lt-:C'l'llHll STUl' DA11-:-:/'fl,.1F: On/00/00
COLLECTEU µyl ARAD wALLAC~ R~~~JVFO f'RIJVI ~~AD ~ALl,ACf SAMPLE R~c•o1 U~T~,/T1M£ 09/12/ij] 11~1) REC'0.8Yl r H~~~~:r·r SEAifo I ·.n-:s
CHe~lSTI ANALt'l'ICAL ,_.ETHOlll
RENA~KJ '-Rl-:.MARK I
SAMPLf LUC VERIFI~O KYI T~R l>ATA V~PIFJED PYr OGA
\_. •••REMANKS•••
I
1 .. {
I..,
HtSlll..iTS
40000,IN
411000,lN
41JQl1UdN
41}0(1().J1•
l 00000J11
nu,10,JN
\E♦Ob,JN
100U00Jrl
lf-:+t•h\Jr,, ,,
JHI UG/KG CU'WIIUNU Hl\nf-:
CJ ALKYLijif'lZtNI:: "1f;TH'iLPIH:NOl.,
PHF'.flYL':lHf-:R IJOlll::CAr-1UJC ACID TKTHAD!CA~UIC AC(IJ PiNT~O~CAr1fllC ACIU lfl::XAOlCA~OIC AClU UCTAlll::CA~r1IC AC!U 4 UNlCl~~Tlfl~•> Cll~•PUIIHl1S
PLTFHJU:U"1 PkODUC"r
•
•
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS HANAG!HENT SYSTEM EPA-ESD,REG IV ATHENS sEORGIA
11/02/Bl PESfICIDES/PCBIS AND OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS DATA REPORTING SHEET SEDIHENT/SOIL/SLUDGE(DHY WT)
SAMPLE N0,1 BJCJ~94 SAMPLE TYPEI SOIL
!S8~~~r ~8t}EXfs2~~~s SI~~OGRAM ELEM[NTI NSF C!TYI MACO STATEI NC
STATION IlDJI AH•IS STORET ST TON NOi
SAMPLE CDLLECTIONI START DATE/TIME D9/09/BJ !JOO SA•PLE COLLECTION! STOP DAf[/TIHE 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYi BRAD WALLACE RECEIVED FROM' BRAD WALL.CE SAMPLE RtCIDI DATE/TIME 09/12/83 1150 RECD BY! T BENNETT BEAL•DI YES
CHEMISfl SJH ANALYT CAL METHODI
REMARK I REHARKI
SAMPLE LOG VERirIED BY! TBB DATA V!RiritD BYI SJH
•••REMA~Ks••• PESTICIDE DATA SUSPECT BASED ON OC••UBE roR •SCREENING" DNL~II
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• ■A•AVERAGE VALUE ■NA•NDT ANALYZED •NAI•INTERr!RENCES
RESULTS 1U
7U
7U 711 711 7U mu
~gu
20U lOU 20U 2UU 20U 40U 60U 200U 60U 60U 60U 2oou 60U soou lOU NA ••
..
•• 40U ll
· ■J•ESTIMATED VALUE •N•PRESUMPTlYE EVIDENCE or PRESENCE or MATERIAL IK•ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE ESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •U•MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS . THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT I, WHtN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, S~E ~HLORDANE CONSTITUENTS, 2, CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES Of fECHNICAL CHLORDANE,
•••••ANALYTICAL FE6ULTS•••••
UNITS COMPOUND IJG/KG ALDRIN UG/KG HEPTACHLOR UG/KG HEPTACHLOR EPOX!UE IJG/KG ALPHA•HliC IJG/KG BETA•HHC UG/KG GAHMA•BHC (LINDANE) UG/KG DELTA•RHC UG/KG ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) UG/KG DIELURIN UG/KG 4,4'•DDT !P,P••DUTJ UG/KG 4,4'•D11E P,Pl•ODE) UG/KG 41 41•DUU P,P 1•DUD) UG/KG tunRIN UG/KG ENDOSULFAN 11 (BETA) IIG/KG ENnOSULfAN SULFATE UG/KG CHLUROAN~ (TSCH, HIXTUHE) UG/KG PCB•124l ARUCLUR 1242) UG/KG PCB•l254 ARUCLUR ll54J UG/KG PCB•1221 ARDCLUR 1221) .UG/KG PCB•l232 ARUCLOH 12J2J UG/KG PCA•124B ARLICl10H 124ijJ UG/KG PCB•l2bU AHUCLUH !2b0) UG/KG PCR•IO!b ARUCLUH 101b) UG/KG TOXAPHENE UG/KG EN~RIN ALDEHYDE UG/KG 2 1 3171 8 TCDD(DIDXIN) UG/KG CHLURu~NE /2 UG/KG ALPHA•CHLgR□ENt /2 UG/KG GASMA•CIJL RDENE /2 UG/KG l•HYUHOXYCHLOHUENE /2 UG/KG GAMHA•CHLORDANE /l UG/KG THANS•NONACHLQR /2 UG/KG ALPHA•CHLOROANE /2 UG/KG CIS•NDNACHuOH /~ UG/KG METHOXYCHLOR I MOISTURE
/I
.STUH~ T
]9jjJ 39413 3942]
J'JIHO
J42> 7 HHJ 34102 34 Jb4 lY J•J J9JOI l9HI l9JII JYH3 34]>9
l4 J> 4 J9JOI
J'J4'J9 JY>U)
J94' I J94'J5
J'J~UJ 39>1 I
39>14 J94Ul J4 3b9
H67 e 8!7b5
]9011 39013
]9070 394"1 70J~U
• •
• •
C
C
_,
.,
e
g
_;
j
j
'--
'--
'--
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MINAGEMENT SYSTEM
[PA•tSOtRCG Ix ATHENS aEORGI
11/02/Bl PtSTICIDtS/PCBIS ANO OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS DATA R•POPTlttC 6Hl[T &EDIMENT/SUIL/BLUOGE(DRY WT)
SAMPLE N0,1 B3C3595 SAMPLE TYPEI SOIL
~SB~~ir ~8ttE:1;2~i~s SI~~UGRAH ELEMENT[ cnv, MACO BTATEI NC
NSr
STATION 11011 AH•2S STORE? St t ON NOi
SAMPLE COLLECTION[ START DUE/TIME 09/08/83 '1330 SAMPLE COLLECTION[ STOP DAT[ITIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYI BRAD WALLACE RECEIVED FRDMJ BRAD WALLACV. SAMPLE RECIDI DATE/TIME 09/12/Bl 1150 R~C D BYI T BENNETT BUU:D1 HS
CHEMIST! SJH ANALYTICAL HETHODI
REMARK! REMARK!
SAMPLE LOG VERlrIED BYt TBB
•••REMA~KS•••
DATA VERIFIED BY1 SJH
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••rOOTNOTES••• . •A•AVERAGE VALUE •NA•NOT ANALYZED •NAI•INTERfERENCE~ •J•fSTIMATED VALUE •••PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PR~SENCE OF MATERIAL •K•ACTUAL VALUE 1s KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •U•MATERIAL WAS NALYZED fOR RUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM O[TECTION LIMIT I, WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEt tHLOROANE CDNSTITUENTA, 2, CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES or TECHNICAL CHLORDANE,
RESULTS 400U 400U
400U :888 4000 400U HOU eou
loou DOU 00IJ
IOOIJ 0 OU
20011 200U JOOOU looou 000IJ 3000U JOOOU IOOOU lOOOU 3000U 2000 NA •• •• .. .. .. ..
300U 49
•••••ANALYTICAL fiESULTS•••••
UNITS COMPOUND UG/KG ALDRIN UGIKG HEPTACHLOR UG/KG HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE UG/KG lLPHhBHC UGIKG BETA•~HC UG/KG GAHMA•BHC (LINDA"El UG/KG DELTA•IIHC UG/KG ENDUBIJLfAN I (ALPHA) UG/KG DIELDHIN
UG/KG 4,4 1 •DOT !P,P 1•DDT! UC/KG 4,4••0DE P,Pl•ODE UG/KG 4r4 1 •PDD P,P 1•UDO IIG/KG ENORIII UG/KG ENOOSULFAN II (RETA)
IJG/KG ENOUSULrAN BULrAT~ UGIKG CHLOHDANE (TECH 1 HIXTUHE) UG/KG PCR•l242 !AROCLuH 12•2I UG/KG PCB•l,54 AROCLOR f2~4I UG/KG PCR•l221 AROCLOH 2i11 UG/KG PCR•l232 !AROCLOR 12$2) UG/KG PCR•l248 ARUCLOH 12•8>
UU~I/KKGG PCR•,260 AROCLUH 12001 v PCR• 016 AROCLOR 0161 UO/KQ TOXAPH~HE · UG/KG ENORIN ALDEHYDE UG/KG 2r3t71B TCDU(UIUXINI UG/KG CHLUROENE /2 UG/KG ALPHA•CHLORUENE /2 UG/Kn GAHMA•CHLUHUENE /2 UG/KG l•HYUROXYCHLUROENE /~ UGIKG GA•HA•CHLOPDANE /2 UG/KG TRAN5•NONACHLOR /2 UC/KG ALPHA•CHLURDANE /2 UG/KG ClS•NONACHLOR /2 UG/KG METHOXYCHLUH I MOISTURE
II
5T<.JRlT J93H 39413 lY4'3 9010 34')1
]9J4J J42b2 34 Jb4 39Hl 39$UI 39 n I Bll 1 )93'3 HJ>9 J 4 J:, 4 l9J~1
19499 Y)U7 9491 394Y$ 395U3 B> 11
39)14. J94Ul J4 Jb9 J4bH bl"lb5
BBi I JYU/3
HUIO J94Ml 70l:10
•
• •
SAMPLg AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-,so tREC IV ATHENS GEORGIA
11/02/83 PESTICIDES/PCBIS AND OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS DATA RtPORTINC SHEET SEDIMENT/BOIL/SLUDCE(DAY WT)
SAMPLE N0,1 BlC3596 SAMPLE TYPEI SOIL
tflfld~if ~8tlE:f;2ilis CITYI MACO
STATION llDJI AH•lS STORET ST TON NOi
PROGRAM ELEMENT! NSF SITE STATE I NC
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 09/0B/B3 1415 SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYI BRAD WALLACE RECEIVED FROM' BRAD WALLACE SAMPLE RiC 1DI DATE/TIMI 09/12/Bl 1150 RECD BYI T BENNETT SULEDI XES
CHEMjSTI SJH ANAL TICAL METHOOI
UH ARK I REHARKI
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYI TBS DATA VERlrl!D BYI SJH
•••RtHARK&••• . PEST!CID~ DATA SUSPECT BASED ON OC••USE FOR •SCREENING" ONL!II
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
111rOOTNOtES••• . •A•AVERACE VALUE oNA•NOT ANALYZrD •NAI ■INTERFERENCEq •J•[STIMAT[D VALU[ •N•PR[SUHPTIVE EVIDENCE or PRESENCE or MATERIAL •K•ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO RE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •U•MATtRIAL WAS ANALYZ[O roR BUT NOT D[T[CT!D, THE WUMBER IS TH[ MINIMUM DtTtCTIOH LIMIT I, WHtN HOV LUE IS RtPORTEDt SEE ~HLORDANE CONSTITUENTS, 2, CONITitUEHtl OA METABOLlTtl or TECHNICAL CHLORDANE,
RESULTS 90U 90U 90U
iou OU 90U
gou OU 50U 70U
lou OU 70U
iou OU ~ooou ooou 60UU jOOOU ooou 20000 6000 2ooou 2ooou BOU NA .. .. .. •• .. •• .. .. 200U 21
•••••ANALYTICAL ~ESULTS••••• .
UNITS COMPOUND sroR<T UG/KG ALDRIN JYJJ l UG/KG Ht;PTACHLOA ~•41J UG/Ka HfPTACHLOA EPOXIDE V4 <). 'UG/K A PHA•HHC JYO/b
UG/KG BETA•BHC 342>7 uGnG GAHMA•BHC (LIHDANEI rHl ug1~G DELTA•BHC · ·i•2 _) U I G ENOOSULFAN I (ALPHA) • •t UG/KG DIS.~ORIN . )VHl UG/KG 411 •DDT (P,P'•DDTI 39JUI 0 UG/~G 41 tl•DDE !P,Pl•UD•j pu1 UGI G 4~ '•DOU P,P'•DUO V JI UG/KG E OHIN J93Yl UG/KG ENOOSULFAN II (BETA! Hl>V 0 UG/KG ENDOSULFAN SULFATE J 4 J :> 4 UGIKG CHLORDANE (TECH~ MlxryHE) II JVBI UG/KG PCB•l241 IAHOCL A 124 J 394V9 UGnG PCB•l25 AHOCLOH 12>41 )V5U7
UG/KG PCR•l221 AHOCLOR 121 l 394Y~ ·UG/KG PCB•l232 AHOCLUR l2J~J 394< UG/KG PCR•l24B AHUCLOH l24HJ t•oJ UG/KG PCR•l200 ARDCLOR 1200) V > 1 l • UG/KG PCB•l016 (ARUCLUH l016J 3V>l4 UG/KG TOXAPHEHE 31' 4UJ UG/KG ENOHlfll ALPEHYl.JE ] 4 J ti 9 UG/KC 2~3676B TCDU(UIOXINJ J 4 b "11:1
UfK8 C !, R ENE /2 1:11 7b 5 • U /K ALPHA•CHLORDENE /2 UC/KC GAMMA•CHLORDE~E /2 UC/KG l•HlDROXYCHLOROENE /2 UC/KG CAMMA•CHLORDA~E /2 39B1I UGIKG TRANS•NONA~HLOR /2 lYO IJ UC/KG ALPHA•CHLO DANE 12 UG/KG Cis•NONACHLOR 12 )9010 UG/KG METHOXYCHLUR J 'l 4 ti 1
' MOISTURE 70320
t.,
0
0
• -
•
SAHPLE AND ANALYSIS HANAGEH[NT SYSTEM EPA•[SDtREG IV ATHENS ~EORGU
ll/02/8) PESTICIDES/PCBIS AND OTH~R CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS DATA REPORTING SHEET SEDIMENT/SOIL/SLUDGE(DRY WT)
SAMPLE N0,1 83C3597 BAHPLE TYPEt SOIL
~S8iEif :8tlt:f;2tf¥s si~~OGRAM ELEMENTt Nar CITYI MACO !TATEi IIC
STATION 11011 AH•4S STORtT ST TON NOi
SAMPLE COLLECTIONt START DATE/TIME 09/08/83 1500 SAHPLt COLLECTIONt STOP OATE/TIHE 00/00/00 ·
COLLECTED BYt BRAD WALLACE RECEjVED FROM' BRAD WALL·Acr SAMPLE RECl01 DATE/TIHE 09/12/83 I 50 RECD BYt T BENNETT SEALED! YES
CHEMIST I SJH ANALYTICAL HETHODI
REHARKI RE HARK I
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BYI TBB DATA VERIFIED BYI BJH
•••REMARKS••• PESTICIDE DATA SUSPECT BASED ON OC••USE FOR 'SCREENING" ONL:11
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
·••rOOTNOTEs••· •A•AVE~AGE VALUE •NA•NOJ ANALYZED •NAI•INTERF!RENCE~ . •J•EST MATED VALUE •N•PHE UHPTIVE EVIDENCE or PRESENCE or MATERIAL •K•ACT AL YALU! 15 KNOWN TD BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •U•HATERIAL WAS ANALYZEO roR BUT NUT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS THE MINI~UM DETECTION LIMIT I, WHEN NO VALUE IS REPDRTEDt SEE tHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS, 2, CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES or TECHNICAL CHLORDANE,
RESULTS ]OU ]OU JOU ]OU ]OU JOU
f°u OU OU JOU
IOU OU OU 1ou OU .. 200U 2ogu 20 U ~oou oou rou ogu 0 U IOU NA
IOU OU OU 13u " IOU
0~5J " h8
•••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS••••• • UNITS COMPOUND 8TUHt.'T
UGIKG ALO~IN J9JJ3 UG/KG HEP ACHLOR 3'41] UG/KG HEP~AClfLUR EPUXIDE 3y4·, J
UGIKG ALP A•BHC HO 1o
UG/KG HETA•BHC J4 2>7 UGIKG GA"MA•BHC CLINDANE) HJ43
11g1KG DELTAoBHC J"·~ IJ /KG ENoOSULHN I (ALPlfA) 4Jb UGIKG D!E~DRIN 39JOJ DGIKG 41 4 •DOT iP,Pl•OOT) l9jOI UG/KG ,,21-ooE P,P'•OUE~ i~ 'I UG/KG 4~ l•DDD P,Pl•ODD 9 ll UGIKG E oRIN HHJ UG/KG ENnOSULrAN II (BETA) J4 3::,y UGIKG ENoOSULfAN BULrATE l 4 j!) 4 UGIKG CHLOHDANE (TECH 6 MIXT~HE) /I ]9J~1 UGIKG PCR•l242 ARIICL R 124 J H4'9 UG/KG PC8•12S4 AROCLOR l,>4) H>o7 UGIKG PCB•l22I AHOCl,UH 12H) 394~1 UG/KG PCB•l~l2 AkUCLOH J2J2J 3114'15 UGIKG PCR•I 48 AHOCLOR l24ij) 39::,u J UG/KG PCA•l~bO AHOCLOR 1200) HSI!. IIG/KG PCs•i 16 ARUCLOR OlbJ H>I UG/KG TUXA HENE H40J UG/KG ENDHIN ALDEHYDE i4JOIJ UG/KG 2~30708 TCUD~OIOXIN) 4 ti I ij UG/KG C I, R ENE / ijl7b~. IJG/KG ALPHA•CHLOPUENE /2 IIG/KG GAMHA•CHL□RUENE 12 UG/KG l•HYDHOXYCHLOHOENE /2 UG/KG GAMMA•CHLOHDANE /2 J9ij I I UGIKG TRANS•NONACHLOR /2 JIJ U I J UGIKG ALPHA•CHLOHOANE /2 IIG/KG CIS•IIONACHLOR /2 )SOIU UG/KG HETHllXYCHLOR HUI
' H016TURE 7UUO
•
(
<
• •
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYST!M. !PA•E5D1REG IV ATHENS oEORGll
11/0Z/IJ PESTICIDES/PCBIS AND OTHER CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS DATA REPORTING SHEET SEDIMENT/SOIL/SLUOGE(DRT WTJ
SAMPL! N0,1 83C)598 SAMPLE TYPE! SOIL
~S8j~iI ~8,ft~?s2ii~s Sl~~OGRAM ELEMENT! Nsr
CITY! MACO STATEI NC
STATION llD!I AH•5S STORET ST l ON NOi
SAMPLE COLLECTION! START DATE/TIME 09/0B/8) 1530 SAMPLE COLLECTION! STOP OAT!/TIHE 00/00/00
COLLECTED BYI BRAD WALLACE RECEIVED fROHf BRAD WALLACE SAMPLE REC 1DI DATE/TIME 09/IZ/Sl 1150 RECD BYI T BENNFTT SEALED I YES
CHEHISTI SJH ANALYTICAL MtTHDOI
REMARK I REHARKI
SAMPLE LOG VERirlED BYI TBB
•••RtHAPK!•••
DATA VERlrIED BYI SJH
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
11,rooTNOTES••· . tA•AV!~AGE VALUE tNA•NOT ANALYZED· tNAl•INT!RrER!NCES IJ•EST MATEO VALUE ·••PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE 8' PRESENCE or MATERIAL •K•ACT AL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALE GIVEN •U•MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED roA BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUNB[R I3 THE MINIMUM DETECTION LIMIT 11 WHEN NO VALUE 18 AEPORTEn, SF.E tHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS, Z, CONSTltU[NTS OR METABOLIT~S or TECHNICAL CHLORDANt,
RESULTS JOOU
188S JOOU )OOU
1888 )OOU 200U )888 30011 lOOU ~ggg
70U0H 7000 toou ooou ooou 7000U 3000U 7000U 6000U 200U NA .. .. .. .. ..
40011
66
•••••~N.1,LYTICAL RESULT!•••••
UNtTS COMPOUND 5llftH.:'f IIG/KG ALDRIN l> J Jl UG/KG HEPTACHLOA l9Hl UG/KG HEP~ACHLOR EPOXIDE JH<l UG/KG ALP A•l:JHC por~ UG/KG B!:'J'A•BHC 4 2 !!I 7 UG/KG GAMMA•~HC ILINOANEJ J9J4J UGIKG UELTA•RHC J420:l UG/KG ENOOBULt'AN I (ALPHA) )4Jb4 UG/KG DIELDHIN · )9)0)
UG/KG 4,t••DDT lp,p,.onr> PJ"I C UGIKG 4,4'•Dl>E P1 Pl•OUEj 9JJ
UG/KG 4~4••DUD CP,P••OUD HJII UG/KG E DR Ill HHJ UG/KG ENnOSULrAN II ( BETA l 34J~9 C UG/KG ENoOSUL AN SULYATE )4 3>4 UG/KG CHLOHDANE IIECH6 Ml~l~HE) II HJ>I UG/KG PCB•l242 CAHUCL RI 4 l 3'4'9 UG/KG PCa•1~s• )AHUCLOH 1~••J J9:,u7
UG/KG PCR• 21 AROCLUH <IJ 194'I UG/KG PCR•l2l2 !ARUCLOH l2J2J )94'5 . UG/KG PCB•l248 ARUCLUA !~QB) J':i~UJ UGIKG PCB•l200 AHOCLOH I bOl J!J~ll. Uc/Kg PCB•IOlb ARUCLUR IOl6J Jl.:l514 UG/K TUXAPHENE ]SQOJ
UG/KG ENDHrn ALUEHYUE J 4 J ti Ii UG/KG 2~3o76B TCDD(UIOXIN) J 4 t,, ij UGIKG C ~ R ENF. 12 Bl lb5. UG/KG AL HA•CHLORDENE /2 UG/KG GAMMA•CHLORDENE 12 UG/KG l•HYUHOXYCHLOHDENE n UG/KG GAMHA•CHLORUANE /2 Bal I UG/KG THANS•NONACHLUR. /2 J "u -,_3 UG/KG ALPHA•C Hl,OROANE /2 llG/~G Cls•NONACHLOH /2 190"/0 UG/KG METHOXYCHLOH 194'1
I MOISTURE 1UJ:l0
t.
C
'1
• •
'
•
•
•
\......JAT'L-Q_ Tl\ 13'-'i:. C..O n,OU 0-..r\1'{:) COn'ST\-:,_ucT'lD
•
'SU\-:,_(='\ Cl AL A.~\..J_\~'('n....
I c.ru \,__\L__\ n s 'S \TL
[PA 0,1
□
EPA 03
0
EPA 02
N
•
I
L-"C...Cr ~ h D ·.
~ 4 ~ .s -
DRAFT
,-AA .cf
EPA 05
.0 .,
0
PIJTTER'S
MAC □,
PITS-SITE
NC
Q -, SHALL □\./ \./ELL
□ -DEEP \./ELL
-DEEP AQUIFER FLOW
-_SHALLOW AQUIFER FLOW
0
□ 'L.PA 8
-lol•.~ 0 'i:__P/\ 'l
•0 __..-,'CA n S 'LA \..--~ v 'CL tl AT<...J ..r.
\.......J AT'C n_ rA GL-'[..._ C..O h T"OU ~
D l n.s.c , 1 o \>
I= l-Oc...,J
•
Tl-\ "i:.._ DA,'[_ 0 ,;=::. •\-\-=;::_ L,J • L.. ·
...,..,_ ~ \, ,.S \ 5 \7. 0, S \'::, 'C.-C. \ ~ \ "C t::,
• \ .. s A. s s '--' ~ '\:_ t:, \ \-\ A.\ '-...>-.) ' \_ . s
·'
..r-,_ 'C. A.<; l.J Id-'[ -
' ~ u--,..
v...) 'C \,-'L_
/
•
Pollutecl Wells The Legacy
Of Ig11ored Regulatio,is
Continued From Page IC facilities utilizing ponds, lakes, re·
Of the Division of Environmental tention basins. or lagoons, auto-
h matically create noncompliance Management (DEM), cites t e situations."
Gurkins as a reason the state Wilms said the "crescendo. of
needs tough and enforceable regu-opposition ... leads me I_O ques-
lations over groundwater pollu-tion what they (industries) are
lion. C' . doing." .
But Charles Case of N.C. ,u-To answer that· question, the
zens for Business and Industry N.C. Department of Human Re·
sc,ys: "The rules place a burden on sources (DHR) recently received a
the citizens of North Carolina to s4oo,OOO grant to test industrial i
keep the. groundwater untouched sites where groundwater pollution
and unused. In order for man to is considered likely. said DHR .
prospei, resources _must be used solid waste chief O.W. Strickland.
and ground~•ater is a resource , In April 1981 chemical spills.at
just like our air and surface w~ter, Sodycco, a division of M_arun-
·which are regulated and use? f~~ Marietta Chemicals, contaminated .
all the citizens of North Carolina. some deep water wells in the area,
Industrial concerns already about 10 miles west of Charlotte.
ha\'e prompted one delay. At the on N.C. 27 and the Catawba . En\·ironmental Management Corn-s · om River. mission's Sept. meeting, c. · Others flagged as possible dan· mission member Virgil McBnde, Ch h 'd t ger spots include a at_ am an RJ. Reynolds vice pres1 en , County site where Internat1onal !
successfullv moved to postpone Telephone & Telegraph Corp. had : the date the rules become effec-d
5 I lagoons filled with creosote •~ a tive from Sept. 8 to Jan. ' to a. Chemtronics Inc. plant In Bnght ; low more time for study. . The regulations prohibit Mountain where the company;
groundwater contamination more built _acid pits during World War'
than 20 feet below the earth's sur• II, said Strickland.
face. Where pollution is.• found, v·-·-.. •---· -·"·-·-. -·-·-·
DEM will require cleanup .. Fur• f ·
ther, DEM will not permit a .land , · .
use that could possibly pollute the 1;
groundwater. · il
Duke Power Co. wan.ts a dilut-.~
ion zone allowed in the subs~rface 'it.,.
waters. Carolina Power & Light
Cc ... believes the drinking .\vater J?
standard "will. at many ind\.lstrial i -~-~~~~~------\
f \
:.--•• :._,r..,;.y_•:·:·· ':
. ·--~· •·~ ·.·, --:Story or.-Picture Idea? .Call
• . . ."":;_•;:.•. ,,;,_ ... •· --
~-~-J :..,. . . --.• --:.-_;
'2rhr 0liarl.ot.fr ®&srroet}i~
Surfday;Sep1Efmlferr.~s;·~1 ~ff;
...._ ,:-~-.-."?-•• ·-•. --· -... ·-
• -,. ... , ~ •. -J. " .-1 • .. .. ~-$. •. ' (704) 379"6459 8 a.m.-Mrdnight ..
•1 ---~•~·_,.,..~_.p••. ,. .:.:. .. ~ ~-.-.!~,:r~~Jff.-~ -i~~'-Fi-}:_~.:-.
~Jimdustwy:§e·eks W~aket'·.il1~~rd~:: ·:i-,:: ,.:_ : ;::i;~: .. _ --· • ,; ~ :;;~· ., , , ; :: _ '"" , _
c~~~Yi!lut~·d· .. Jfell~,;f f!#~t[;Pf ignored •Water .~~l!i
,,; BfKA'l.:HERINE WHITE of more-. .than 40,000 .. gallons··of<\tion Agehcy'"-sampled the buried As investigators explor~d::the met last week With state ground• ~ :~~~-=. _-~. _ :'i,?J~~.~·~~~au : : .creosote :.and 'fuel oil. The waste 2WaSt~?.but::the ·_ teSts:.a!'en't com-Gurkins' yard this month, busi• · water·exJ)erts.· ·' · · -~-." ~
C,,i>RALEIQ_l:lr,,'_'.;-;;i;fEar),alld·. Dixie ·was' auinped illegally by ·a· preyi.:;,\plete.' .. ,L;:·:-< -. . •. · . ness and industry •in-:North Car· ·,,;:some -:industry •represen~tives
_ Gurkin' m9vedtinto:)th_eit;· Bruns•' 'o,us owner's son, who'mai'ntained~}~;2Sariip!es::trom,the':Gurkins'·weli . olina. started a campaign-tcl'dilute ·have:,ccomplained·£•state·: environ-
., wi_ck °County ,!Jome':in''Jtily.: 1982; -lagoons orr:the farmland_ between~·\show··1 OO•parts-per•li_illion·of phe-or delay the state's .groundwater ·. m_entalists-went'too:far when.they
.un,.ware ,th,at_much oL their' 3 ½· 1969 and 1976. Tests showed-Gur0 0 . nols;•: Which ,iriafow.;doses· over. a regulations, scheduled ,to •become -0c'oncludeo'sthat"ail -groundwater
. 'acreJ . .h-o'mesite · covered. ac.deadlv · kin's well heavily -polllite<l · with ,Jong ,period ,can~cau'se ;liver. ·and . •effective Jan. 5. ·-· . , .. • should ·meeFdifoking water,stail•
.:1~a~y,:. ,.: .. ,·.C:i' .. :.. -· ·· ·.· chemicalresidtie. . :· · . . :'ki.dneY,dalllage,'-"according to ·the Representatives from the tex• 'c:lards.s·i\.bout>half the state's popu-
:.''.' Fightini(a7mibborn bare·spot in. :.Doctors are running tests on the ·N.C:'.;Toxic.;Substances~ Manage-tile industry and the N.C. Citizens · \ati6n1<:uses'·."grounowater· .. 1or
:: his-.lawn,a,year.later, Earl.Gurkin Gurkins -aild . their 2½-year-old-.·-ineriitGuide.'i.~Three-sparts,per-bil-·: ·'for· Business and Industry, a coali-drinking.' c'.ic,: a :: .. • ·o . ,->.·/:·_
: called .in ·a neighbor. with.a0back-· -'claughter·Pamela. :Two:weeks ago .-.lioif-:of-:"plienols.in drinking . .water· •tion· .including Piedmont Airlines . · Pail! 'Wilins,0·assistant director
:;hoe.:and •. unco\lerea~the··:reinnants the f_ederal.Environm~ntal Protec-.-,'is·considere,;!~'rionpolluted."-and RJ. Reynolds Industries Inc., See POLLUTED Page·4C' · ,: _ ~ .. ,.., -:•• '---~·_-__:-··-· '-• ... --., ;--~·.:::·•/.::.: ~.:-· .. :: .· . -,. . . --;~--,.------·-·~-I
C I
i
0
e • • Sunday Star-News / Sunday, September 18, 1983
·+ A ·if@(f@Mh¼#il"!"C M-##!i#&·r#tl P ::-& i# ffl9ii44£'&4 44 S@AAd ·W9¼%½i§RSMd¾iii#¥·Aa&t--#€ii&td&-NM 14®#1½§ ?*M?f&-PW& #1>·}'.t¥/:&i5AikS3ihi-kii_;.: t S!Mi ·
al/A
Law slows liquor sales; 4B
family" s search for truth :muddied by contaminants
By.Deborah Kelly
Staff'. Writer
-A Brunswick County couple who discovered in July
that-their homesite was used for seven .years as an
illegal dumping ground are trying to find out why they
were never told the tarnished history of their property.
Earl and Dixie Gurkin are also trying to find out
whether their health has been damaged after, using
contaminated well water for a year. The Gurkins and
-.their 2½-year-old daughter, Pamela, underwent a se-
ries.of health tests Thursday that will be analyzed at
Duke University. · '_
· ~ "We're worried," Gurkin said. "We're 'definitely go-
ing'to get off the land. We don't know how_Cjuick: or
· anything, but we were hoping the EPA (Environmental
PJ:otection Agency) would relocate us. We cari't afford_ to
pick up and buy a new piece,,of land." ! ;-· _ ·
·:The Gurkins have lived in ·a double-wide mobile
hcnne on the contaminated site at Sandy Creek Acres,
off U.S. 74-76 near'Maco, since July 1982. They discov-
ered the illegal dump a year later, when Gurkin noticed _ an -area of the 3½-acre-site-where the grass-woeJdn't grow. Using a bulldozer, he dug down four to six<fllet,
unearthing a substance that looked like it ha:dsbeen
dumped from "runny barrels of sludge," Mrs. Gurkin
said. · · ,. , /.,: ,-
::C::-The · state Division.of Health Services-told,tj,e'.Gur-
!tins;to,stop IJ!!.i!lg t\leir !Vell ,wa~r ·i\fter te~ts:sJ!~~:it was:contamiilated with phenols .and. other.,cliem1cals.
They are now using water from ·a neighbor's well'across
·.the:street, which is deeper than the Gurkina' well. Tes,t.s
: ·' · • • i . ·,·. • --,~ -;;._;,•; • : •• ;Staff photo by Jack u~
Earl, Dixie and Pamela Gurkin In front of a hole in their front yard that contained. contaminated soil.
on tlie:neighbor's-,well,did-not reveal ·any.co!ltaminas . heavy number six fuel oil and creosote into four'pits on
ti_on(,:'.c ~ , _ ',\_ ·· -- . ·.: .. • what is now the Gurkins' front yard between 1969 and
The.source of the oontamination goes back m_ore;than 1976., ..... , • -. . . ,
-sev'eriyears, according to Ray Church, a waste manage-Otto Skipper, owner of Hanover.Septic.Tank Co. in
m~tit specialist in t}ie Division ofHe!'-lth Sen.:i_ces \"'Ii~ Wilmington, wasicharged in 1976'by·the·Division of
and· hazardous waste management branch. At that ~ .• Environmental Management with unlawful._dumping. time, he said, DEM discovered that a septic tank pump-.. and· fine,!'$2,500. The penalty.'was never paid because
~r had dumped septic. tank sludge, 20,000 gallons of. · Skipper went banki:tipt. Church said. · · ,.
' .
The Coast Guard wound·. up paying more than
$24,000 for the cleanup for. which Skipper should have
been responsible. More than 150 dump truck loads of oil :
sludge and oil-stained dirt were excavated and trans-
ferred', to. the Brunswick_ Qounty landfill in August
1976. Nevertheless, cleaniip,crews failed to remove all
the contaminated soil, as-evidenced liy0the·hugepile of
.oily.dirt now·in the Gurkillll'.backyard. · . ,_·
r,
'.'
The Gurkins have hired Long Beach lawyer Da,~d
Ford to "try to get our money back" for the land. The
property has changed hands three times since Wacho-
via Bank of Goldsboro acquired the property during
foreclosure proceedings in 1979.
"I honestly feel like some of the sellers knew about
the pit.s," Gurkin said. "Whether Ford can prove crimi-
nal fraud or not, I don't know." . -
Wacho,ia officers were vague on the details of the
Skipper foreclosure. .
"The problem in this situation is that the lender who
knew Skipper and negotiated the transaction isn't here
any more," said Robert Wall, vice president of retail
loan ,administration· at Wachovia's Raleigh branch.
''But there's nothing in my records that would indicate
we knew it was an illegal dump site."
Wachovia sold the land in November 1980 to Wilbur
McLamb, who proceeded with plans to build a subdivi-
sion there. McLamb sold a portion of the land.to Wil..:
liam Cook, who sold it to the Gurkina.
Ford said Friday he has been able to determine that _
at least one of the owners of the. land -knew it was
formerly an illegal dump site. Although state law re,
quires that licensed dump sites be noted on the deed;
there is no such provision for illegal dumps.
"There's a hole in the law," Ford said. "I hope this
will make the legislature aware of it."
'!"tie EPA : and DHS have performed tests on the
Gurkin property, but few results are available.
Test.a conducted by the environmental epidemiology-
branch. of DHS on.air samples "}~elded no detectable
levels of contaminants in the house. or' crawl space,"·
according to Church. .
Additional tests on air and water samples may not be
completed for four to six weeks ''because of a backlog of
work," said Jan,Rogers of the EPA. -
"My opinion is t..liat if this is going to affect our
health, it's probably down the road somewhere," Gur-·
kin said. "I don't guess I'll ever stop worrying about it."-
I '