Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCD986175644_20030224_Davis Park Road TCE Site_FRBCERCLA LTAR_LTAR Second Quarter Sampling Event Report-OCR►• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Document Control No. RFW138-2A-AMMB Revision 0 LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION SECOND QUARTER SAMPLING EVENT REPORT DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA REGIONS U.S. EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-W7-0026 Weston Solutions, Inc. Suite 100 5430 Metric Place Norcross, Georgia 30092 WESTON W.O. No. 20064.138.100.0910 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Prepared By: Approved By: Approved by: Approved by: LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION SECOND QUARTER SAMPLING EVENT REPORT REVISION0 DA VIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA U.S. EPA Contract No. 68-W7-0026 WorkAssignmentNo.138-RALR-O4PN Document Control No. RFW138-2A-AMMB January 2003 Teresa Offner, WESTON Work Assignment Manager r~4{zt Date: __,_/_,_/4_2__,_~1-/4~3""'--- WESTON Program Manager {P/1--GeoffreyB. Noakes ' Date: __,_/_,_h-=2'-'-<f+fa=o...,3'--- Administrative Support Manager Date: -------- Jennifer Wendel U.S. EPA Remedial Project Manager WESTON W.O. No. 20064.138.100.0910 K:\200641138\Quarterty\secondquarterreport2.doc 1-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written pennission of EPA Section l 2 3 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: Table of Contents1 Revision: 0 Date: January 2003 Page INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1-l I.I Purpose .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Background ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Groundwater Contaminant Description ................................................... 1-3 1.3. I Contaminant Source Area .................................................................. 1-6 1.3 .2 Groundwater Plume Concentration and Extent.. ............................... 1-8 1.4 Site Geology and hydrogeology .............................................................. 1-9 LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION .............................................................. 2-1 2.1 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring ........................................................ 2-2 2.2 First Quarter LTRA Sampling Event ...................................................... 2-5 SECOND QUARTER LTRA SUMMARY ..................................................... 3-1 3.1 3.2 3.3 Groundwater Sampling ............................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Monitor Well Sampling ..................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Community and Private Well Sampling ............................................ 3-2 3.1.3 Field Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples ........................... 3-2 Groundwater Elevation ............................................................................ 3-4 Groundwater Analytical Results ............................................................. 3-4 3.3.1 Groundwater Samples ....................................................................... 3-4 3.3.2 Purge Water Sample ........................................................................ 3-13 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................... 4-1 4.1 LTRA Results Summary ......................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 4-2 4.3 Recommendations ................................................................................... 4-3 K:\20064\ 138\Quarter1y\secondquarterreport2.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This dorument was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA Figure Figure 1-1 Figure 1-2 Figure 1-3 Figure 1-4 Figure 1-5 Figure 2-1 Figure 2-2 Figure 2-3 Figure 2-4 Figure 3-1 Figure 3-2 Figure 3-3 LIST OF FIGURES Title Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: Table of Contents Revision: O Date: January 2003 Site Map ............................................................................................................... 1-2 Residences Connected to City Water-September 2000 ..................................... 1-4 Residences Supplied with Carbon Filtration Units -August 2000 ..................... 1-5 Street Address Location Map ............................................................................... 1-7 Water Supply Sources Following RA ................................................................ 1-10 LTRA Monitor Well Sampling Network ............................................................. 2-3 Potentiometric Contour Map, Bedrock Aquifer April 2002 ................................ 2-7 TCE Concentrations in Groundwater April 2002 .............................................. 2-10 PCE Concentrations in Groundwater April 2002 .............................................. 2-11 Potentiometric Contour Map, Bedrock Aquifer September 2002 ....................... 3-5 TCE Concentrations in Groundwater September 2002 ..................................... 3-11 PCE Concentrations in Groundwater September 2002 ...................................... 3-12 K:\20064\ 138\Quarter1y\secondquarterreport2.doc JI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA Table 1-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 3-1 Table 3-2 Table 3-3 LIST OFT ABLES Title Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Par1< Road TCE Site Section: Table of Contents Revision: 0 Date: January 2003 Residential Well Historical Analytical Results .................................................. 1-11 LTRA Monitor Well Sampling Network ............................................................. 2-4 First Quarter LTRA Field Parameter Measurement Summary ............................ 2-6 First Quarter LTRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary-April 2002 ...... 2-9 Second Quarter LTRA QA/QC Sample Laboratory Analytical Results Summary September 2002 ................................................................................... 3-3 First and Second Quarter LTRA Field Parameter Measurement Summary - April and September 2002 ................................................................................... 3-6 First and Second Quarter LTRA Lab<;>ratory Analytical Results Summary April and September 2002 ................................................................................... 3-8 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A -Field Data Sheets APPENDIX B-Laboratory Analytical Reports K:\20064\138\Quarterly\SeCOndquarterreport2.doc 111 ;:· •.• •I•< •~• •: ./,r ' .. .. ,.,:• ' .·· ·'. I·.·· ... J • . ·' . . , .... ; ·• ,",. , .· .... ·I· .. . '·,· -_.1 ,' ,_ '. :; . ,· . ~ , .... ; ... ·,, ,, .. . --· ., ... ·. . . ·, ,f. ' • . Qgp.Q767 • ' -... ·'. ., :, !~;:~:·~.~ .. :.:,. • • , '<; > ., ;.· ., .: , .. _. ~ . _-.. •,. -;.: \ ;, • .: f •• ·• \.• ·- •. I .. , .. .... , ·,., , . 1 • .~._ .'·>· '· ', ~·:' ~-. ·,,• , , . ~ ·: ..... ,, • .>'· '. ''. , ·'- :, ;"t~r-·:;.\ .• -,.<·:~ ... , • -~.-!'. .. ,:,,:;:· :_; . ~ '-. •,·1 ; .. •,, • .. -· ;, ;:, _ _. -:·.,,. ,-:/t.:--; ,_·), . ··_.'.-.r· -: ... . , . . . ·,•~' ,·.:'. '' ' .. •, •➔-•/. , ,· ·- ··: .:1.. .L ·I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. 1.1 PURPOSE SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 1 Revision: 0 Date: January 2003 Weston Solutions, Inc., (WESTON@) has been tasked by EPA Region 4 to perform the Long Term Response Action (LTRA) at the Davis Park Road TCE Site in Gastonia, North Carolina. The work is conducted under the Region 5 Remedial Action Contract (RAC) Program and implemented as a contract crossover to. Region 4, Contract Number 68-W7-0026, Work Assignment Number 138-RALR-04PN. The LTRA includes monitoring the bedrock aquifer contaminant plume by sampling a network of bedrock wells for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on a quarterly basis for three years and annually thereafter for 27 years to ensure the plume is in fact naturally attenuating. 1.2 BACKGROUND The Davis Park Road TCE Site is located within the Gastonia Extra Territorial Jurisdiction area along Davis Park Road, south of Hudson Boulevard and north of Blackwood Creek in the southwestern portion of Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina. The site consists of an area of reportedly contaminated soil behind a building that is located at 2307 Davis Park Road (Davis Park Auto Repair), and a plume of contaminated groundwater that emanates from this property and extends south along Davis Park Road to Blackwood Creek. The site also includes the Cedar Oak Park subdivision located on the east side of Davis Park Road within the confines of Cedar Oak Circle as well as areas along the western side of Davis Park Road. Figure 1-1 presents a site map for the Davis Park Road TCE Site. K:1200641138\Quarterlylseoondquarterreport2.doc 1-1 - ~ ~ i ~ i I - -- -- - -- FIGURE 1-1 SITE MAP - 9 0 • G1 DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA --- -- 0 - - Approximate Scale In Feet 600 - 1200 ..._ ______________________________________ ..J - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 1 Revision: 0 Date: January 2003 The plume of contaminated groundwater underlies residential areas along the plume's entire horizontal extent. The contaminant levels and areal extent are further described in Section 1.3.2. At the time of the discovery of contaminants in the groundwater (March 1990), a majority of the residences throughout the site were supplied water by residential water supply wells. As a result of the continued migration of the plume, groundwater supplying many of these residential water wells became contaminated with the chlorinated hydrocarbons found in the plume. Since that time, several neighborhoods within the site have been connected to the Gastonia public water supply to reduce the potential health threat from the contaminants. In 1996, many of the houses within the Hedgewood Circle neighborhood, which borders the northern edge of the site, were connected to the public water supply. In late 1997 and early 1998, after petitioning the city for water services, all of the homes in the Cedar Oak circle subdivision, which dominates the eastern side of the site, were connected to the public water supply. Approximately 130 homes within the site were receiving water from residential water supply wells prior to RA activities. Over half of these homes (approximately 75) had water supply wells that were or could potentially be affected by the contaminant plume as depicted in the 1998 Remedial Investigation (RI) report. In August 2000, five of these residences were supplied with carbon filtration units, and in September 2000, 64 of the residences were connected to the Gastonia public water supply as part of the Remedial Action (RA) to execute the provisions of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Site. The locations of the residences connected to the Gastonia public water supply and the carbon filtration units are presented in Figures 1-2 and 1-3, respectively. 1.3 GROUNDWATER CONT AMIN ANT DESCRIPTION This section describes the potential source area of the contamination, current knowledge of the groundwater plume, and the extent of the plume. K:\200641138\Quartertylsecondquarterreport2 .doc 1-3 ~ I ... ------------------- ~ I, Iii li!J &i 111 w z ~ II II • II ~ I • -~ ft q II I II ~' • '" . ,; ~ . ~ 1!111 SI Ila ll!7 II qp~ ~ Ii " I/;, q I 4 ' II I ... iii c::, .. -- rtJil!l i#.i il;i 1111 lili!I iii lii!8 DAVIS PARK ROAD f., m If Eil Q WJ oi w t1 " I • I I " 0 ~~ ,· • s i <:, MOORE"s TRANSMISSION SHOP fl' 0 I i l 1ml ii lie 51 Ill I 0 0 ~ 0 I i ~ • i ◊ a DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA FIGURE 1-2 LEGEND RESIDENCE RESIDENCE CONNECTED TO CITY WATER SEPTEMBER 200J • • ~ I {J1 ------------------- ll] ll] ~ iJ <#I @ {ff ~ [jJ 8 l1J OJ g fiJ 0 [iJ 0 m (jJ @fi {jJ [i] l' ti [jJ llJ /!) Q " @ 0 fl? " I l!I ~ l!I ~ • 0 0 mo ! J ~ 00 m I • • I!] 00 ◊ a DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA RESIDENCES SUPPLIED WITH CARBON FILTRATION UNITS AUGUST 2000 FIGURE 1-3 LEGEND RESIDENCE RESIDENCE SUPP\.IEO WITH CARBON AL TRATION UNITS DRA\YN: J._MILLER DES. ENG.: DA TE: 2B37DP10 ~ W.O. NO.: 20064-138-100-0910 CAD NAME: fi -1-2.dw I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expr~ly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. 1.3.1 Contaminant Source Area Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Par1< Road TCE Site Section: 1 Revision: O Date: January 2003 According to preliminary site investigation reports (see RI Report, 1998, for summary), a groundwater sample was collected on 31 March 1990 from a supply well within the Cedar Oak Park subdivision by Gaston County Environmental Health representatives as part of a routine sampling procedure in accordance with "Community Well Rules." Analysis of the sample revealed concentrations of TCE (34.9 micrograms per liter [µg/L]), tetrachloroethene (PCE) (23.7 µg/L), and chloroform (9.2 µg/L). A confirmation sample was collected from this well on 17 April 1990, and analytical results were similar to the original sample. Groundwater samples collected from three nearby private wells in May I 990 by the Gaston County Health Department indicated that the groundwater was contaminated with TCE. The highest concentration of TCE (101.4 µg/L) was detected in a sample collected from the private well located at 2419 Davis Park Road, 200 feet south of the Davis Park Auto Repair facility (located at 2307 Davis Park Road). The current EPA Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for TCE and PCE is 5 µg/L. Current State (NCDEHNR) MCLs for TCE and PCE are 2.8 µg/L and 0.7 µg/L respectively. Street address locations are shown in Figure 1-4. The Environmental Services Division of EPA collected groundwater samples from the contaminated wells along Davis Park Road and within the Cedar Oak Park subdivision in July 1990. TCE was detected at concentrations of 82 µg/L and 31 µg/L in groundwater sampled from the private well located at 2419 Davis Park Road and a Cedar Oak Park subdivision well, respectively. Additional investigations and groundwater sampling events prior to the initiation of the RI continued to reveal levels of contaminants above State and Federal drinking water standards. Investigation activities focused on a possible source location(s). Several potential sources of the contamination at the Davis Park Road TCE Site were reviewed. Consideration of proximity, K:1200641138\Qua rtertylsecondq uarterreport2.doc 1-6 - "' ~ I ~ i I - -- - - FIGURE 1-4 STREET ADDRESS LOCATION MAP DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA --- -- - --- 0 -- Approximate Scale In Feet 600 - 1200 "L----------------------------------------------------------.....1 - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 1 Revision: O Date: January 2003 regional and local groundwater flow directions, and groundwater sample analytical data indicated that the Davis Park Road Auto Repair facility was the most likely contaminant source at the Davis Park Road TCE Site (NCDEHNR Site Inspection, 1993). As a result of these findings and in an effort to further define the source area for the water supply well contaminants, environmental assessments were conducted, including the Site Inspection Addendum (SI) (May 1993), Expanded Site Investigation (ESI) (May 1994), and RI (1996- 1998). The RI report summarizes the source investigation as follows: " ... according to data generated from this and previous investigations, solvents such as PCE or TCE were introduced to the environment from the property at 2307 Davis Park Road. This 'spill' migrated through the vadose zone and the saprolite/partially weathered rock aquifer, and into the bedrock aquifer. Once introduced into the environment, various biophysiochemical processes acted on the contaminants to reduce the overall concentration as well as spread the contaminant mass throughout various matrices. Currently, the VOC contaminants, principally TCE and PCE, appear to be present only within the bedrock aquifer and may continue to be drawn towards active residential wells scattered throughout the site, specifically those wells to the west of Davis Park Road." 1.3.2 Groundwater Plume Concentration and Extent Five potential sources for water supply were identified in the Davis Park Road Area and presented in the RI report. These include the following: City of Gastonia Public Water Supply System; City of Gastonia Restricted Use Water Line; water supply well as part of a Community Water System; a water supply well as part of a Private Well System, and private water supply wells. Nine monitor wells were installed during completion of the RI (MW-IS, MW-ID, MW- 2S, MW-2D, MW-3S, MW-3D, MW-4S, MW-4D, and MW-SS). Following connection to City Water in August 2000, seventeen private wells were abandoned, seven wells were converted into K:12006411381Quartertylsecondquarterreport2.doc 1-8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 1 Revision: O Date: January 2003 monitor wells (CW-1 through CW-7), and five residences were supplied with carbon filtration units (2400 Skyland, 2419 Davis Park Road, 2717 Davis Park Road, 2839 Davis Park Road, and 2639 Springbrook). Figure 1-5 details the locations and water supply source of residences within the vicinity of the Davis Park Road TCE site updated to include activities completed as part of the 1998 R1 and as part of the 2001 RA to execute the provisions of the ROD for the Site. A summary of analytical data for the primary constituents of concern (PCE and TCE) detected in groundwater sampled at the Davis Park Road TCE Site is presented in Table 1-1. Analytical data was obtained for groundwater sampled after August 2001 from the 5 residences supplied with carbon filtration units as part of the RA to execute the provisions of the ROD. This data is included for PCE and TCE in Table 1-1. Based on these data, the contaminant plume is centered along Davis Park Road from Glenraven to Blackwood Creek and underlies areas approximately 500 feet to the east and west of Davis Park Road. 1.4 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY The geologic profile across the site generally consists of a saprolite layer, underlain by a partially weathered rock zone and the underlying fractured crystalline bedrock. The saprolite is a silty, clay-rich, residual material derived from in-place weathering of rock. The saprolite zone appears to be thickest (approximately 80 feet) near the ridge crest along the northern edge of the site, thinning towards the lower elevations or stream valleys to approximately 20 feet in thickness. A partially weathered rock layer typically underlies the saprolite, and ranges in thickness form approximately 5 to 25 feet. This layer is composed of saprolite and fragments of weathered bedrock. The bedrock is generally observed to be a fractured quartz biotite granite or granitic gneiss. K:120064 \ 138\Quarterty\secondquarterreport2. doc 1-9 I ~I I 1] 1J 1n r-, I, I 'I 1J 1] I ;] I D I ] 1:J 1U il :J 1:J 1U , I •.. I I l~J m ~, N JI w♦E. j s 0 0 ... , 0 • \./ '\ 0 ' -"'0 ' -_ .. -' ~() 1 .. -, -~· _...,.,, ,;... ,O~ _.....--l/ ,oO ----__..,,...-c> \'\.~) ~~---0 GOn.lC CT. ~\ \\ I I C=:J !'D!!!iill llli!iiiillill C=::J II ' --'°'~ 1-l'A.-LlAO D Ii\ ♦ 0 " ♦ ~ o::;i ..... " ~ ~·® ¢¢ <#~ 6 .(p-c ? 0,¢1 (7-4' -~'-\,.---'" .... o ,-_-, P"'" L! 0 ~-<'; t::5 .,,-,·, i .. --C\ () ◊ -c.~: 0 <Yo ,.., ® ,... ® GARAGe b !) : 0 I C RICHLAND AVENUE I GLENRAVEN AVENUE c..=: Q c. !---" I ~II E 0 CJ CEDAR OAK CIRCLE ~ • 1\ ~ ~--~c ,...,,_~-• ¢ -II 0 ®□ ,.... Co (3 s II, t'."': ti l~i-CC} L Cc.;:._: ;-::~".: G ~,, .... ~.j C -· ,-. ~ >. ~II□ ~ ~' [! I \; 'V r, r:, ·-~ i;:..:::. "'ii ...,,, .@C' r .. G' --, fl 'O~~ 0 \_., B~ BARNO // ,. .. a ~ • Q > c:, z \) Ji~ IJ ~® ,s#"'g I i ~ o ; 0 m ¢ C / a -~-1 \) = □ ® CJ O t:I Cl D r::,i;i: z~ ~-"'!, TI ~\~ I I I I SARNS~ \ 0 -_,..,O 0 /~,1 {( 1\ 0 I\ -~ I ... ~ I] I LEGEND RESIDENCES CONNECTED TO CllYWATER RESIDENCES ON RESTRICTED USE WATER LINE-Cl1Y OF GASTONIA RESIDENCES ON COMMUNITYwaLS >OR= 15 SUBSCRIBERS RESIDENCES ON PRIVATE WELL SYSTEM WITH 2-14 SUBSCRIBERS RESIDENCES ON PRIVATE 'NELLS RESIDENCES WITH CARBON FILTRATION UNIT EJ ~ C, w>-f-f-l/l z =i w O <( ~uz _J oZo <( ~ Q:' 0 .---<( Q:' l/l u <( '-::'('.JI Q:' -f-<( <( 0::: Q_ -0 Zz l/l 0 -f-> l/l <( <( 0 ('.) 0 n a, 0 11 ~ 0 0 I 1~ a) 0 n I ~ ow g:;; I" oo~ 3' N ~ >, n. N .. o_ 0:::} :) ~G:: ~ ~~g~ 6 c.o d ~ 0:: w ::JI" I ~~ 6 N "' >-"' -"' o-O ~ (J) w u 0::: ::i <( 0 0::: (J) >-0 _Jz Q_ 3: Q_ 0 ::i _J (J) _J 0 0::: L,_ w I-<( 3: 1-10 en I w 0:: C) C) c:: z 0 U1 5 w 0:: w f--<( 0 0 > 0:: Q_ <(, ---- -- - --- - - - This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA "'.ddress 2501 Briaroak 2510 Briar Oak "'late 6/14190 5/6/96 PCE ND ND TCE ND ND Address 2302 Hedgewood 2314 Hedgewood Date 5/7/96 1/14198 PCE .66AJ ND TCE ND ND Address 2618 Puritan 2612 Puritan Date 4/27/90 5/7/96 PCE ND ND TCE ND ND ID MW-1S MW-1O Screen 20-30 40-75 Date 1/13/98 1/13/98 PCE ND ND TCE ND ND Address 2329 Skyland '•le PCE TCE Address Date PCE TCE J -Estimated Value A -Average Value ND= not detected 7/10/90 5/7/96 trace ND trace 18A 2407 Skyland 4/27/90 5/7/96 ND ND ND 2.6A AD results reported in micrograms per Uter K:\20064\131r-SecoJidQulJt=\Tllbl.e1 Tabkl-1 Teble 1-1 Residential WoJI Hlstorlcal Analytical Results Davis Park Road TCE Site 2241 Cedar Oak 2326 Cricket 148 Grassy 6/9/92 5/7/96 5/7/96 5/7/96 1K ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2322 Hedgewood 2347 Hedgewood 2363 Hedgewood 2375 Hedgewood 1511 Jackson 5/7/96 6/14/90 5/7/96 6/27/91 1/13/98 5/6/96 ND ND ND 1.1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.97AJ 2704 Puritan 2720 Puritan 2725 Puritan 2230 Richland 2425 Rotan 5/6/96 5/7/96 4/27/90 517/96 2/3/93 5/7/96 ND ND trace ND ND ND ND ND trace ND ND ND MW-2S MW-20 MW-3S MW-30 MW-4S MW-4D S-15 21-54 64-74 87-150 36-46 130-142 1/14/98 1/13/98 1/13/98 2/25/98 1/15/98 1/15/98 ND 6 ND ND ND ND ND 17 ND ND ND ND 2308 2314 2304 Skyland Skyland Skyland 2309 Skyland 3/7/95 3/7/95 5/23/94 4/19/93 5/7/90 5/6/96 J ND ND ND 0.85 0.52J 0.91 0.75 0.72 ND ND 2415 Skyland 2634 Skyland Skyland Community Well 5/7/96 4/27/90 5/6/96 4/27/90 7/18/93 9/8/93 ND trace ND ND ND 1K ND trace ND ND 2.4 1K 1-11 8/24/00 ND 7.4 MW-5S 9-19 1/14/98 ND ND 8/24/00 ND ND - - - - -- 2639 Springbrook 2232 Tate 10/17/00 1/24/01 5/9/01 8/10/01 11/20/01 2/25/98 ND ND ND ND ND ND 8.2 8.8 10 8.6 6.8 34 2400 Skyland 10/17/00 1/24/01 5/9/01 8/10/01 11/20/01 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND - ---- - -- ------This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission a EPA. IFe .. 627 CPR 2212 CPR 2231 OPR 6/11/90 6111190 6114/90 7113/90 1125/94 PCE ND trace ND 1K ND TCE ND 1K ND trace ND Address 2307 CPR Date 8/8/91 8/13/92 4119/93 2/10/98 2/10/98 PCE ND ND ND ND ND TCE 301 0.75 172 ND ND Address Date 4/27/90 5/7/90 6/21/90 7/6/90 8/23/90 PCE 1K 0.85 1K ND 1K TCE 101.4 NA 134.3 82 116.3 Address 2425 CPR Date 5/7/90 5/15/90 PCE 0.31 trace TCE 8.4 6.8 Address 2509 CPR 2603 CPR Date 5/7196 6111190 PCE ND 1K TCE ND 1K Address 2723 CPR Date 6/11/90 PCE ND TCE ND E,J -Estimated Value A -Average Value 516196 .76AJ ND 7/13/90 2/3/93 ND J 7.0 30E 6/14/90 516196 ND ND ND ND 2800 CPR 5/23/90 5/6/96 ND 0.62AJ ND ND K -Actual value is known to be less than value given ND -Not detected K:\20064\131\Seeood.Qua.rtd,Tablea Table 1-1, cont'd 3119/93 trace 8.0 8124100 2.2 2.8 6114/90 1K 1.2 5/7/96 5/7/90 ND 0.25 ND 5115/90 5120/90 trace trace 44.5 24.3 10/9190 1/30/91 ND 1K 68AJ 84.2 1125/94 5/30/95 ND ND 11 NA 2717 CPR 10/17100 1124101 0.68 1.8 0.79 2.1 2816 DPR 5/6/96 2/10/98 6.4A 10 14A 18 Table 1·1 (continued) ResldentiBI Well Hlstorlcal Analytical Results Davis Park Road TCE Site 2301 CPR 2304 CPR 5115190 7113/90 1125/94 5/7196 1/14/98 5123194 trace trace ND ND ND ND 44.5 37.1 ND ND ND 0.91 2403 CPR 7/12/90 1/30/91 7123/92 4119193 9124/93 1/25/94 trace trace ND ND ND ND 37.1 28 17 12 7.3 10 2419 CPR 5/20/91 2/3/93 6/21/93 9124/93 1/25/94 815194 1K 0.48 0.56E ND ND ND 66.2 54 23 30 38 NA 2503 CPR 5/7196 5115190 3119/93 5/23194 ND ND ND ND 3.0A ND 1.5 0.65 5/9/01 8/10/01 11/20/01 3/31/90 511190 6121190 1.3 1.2 0.96 23.7 18.9 1.4 1.2 1.1 34.9 51.8 51.8 2839 OPR 11m,n, II 8/24/00 10/17/00 1/24/01 5/9/01 8110101 ND ND ND ND ND ND II ND ND ND ND ND ND 1-12 5130/95 1116/98 ND ND NA ND 5/30/95 5/7/96 2/10/98 ND ND ND NA 15A 8 2719 CPR 7/6/90 8/23/90 10/9/90 12 20.9 14 31 56.1 41 - --- - 8/24/00 10/17/00 1/24/01 5/9101 8/10101 11/20/01 ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.8 5/17/93 1125194 1/25/94 5/7196 1/14/98 13.7 18 17 10 14 44.6 51 50 32 32 . \'":' ,,_.~ 1;__~ -: ··:·:, ,, 'j._;, ~-~.-:,. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document 'Nc3S prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. SECTION2 Seoond Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 2 Revision: O Date: January 2003 LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION The ROD for the Davis Park Road TCE Site (September 1998) states that following initiation of a natural attenuation study, groundwater monitoring will be conducted on a quarterly basis for three years and annually for the next 27 years. Data obtained from the long term groundwater monitoring will be used to evaluate natural attenuation of contaminant constituents within the bedrock aquifer plume at the Davis Park Road Site following provision of city water to 64 residences in August 2000. In April 2002 a baseline sampling event was conducted to establish current conditions and to evaluate the need for installation of additional wells for the LTRA. Based on analytical results, it was determined that natural attenuation was occurring at rates consistent with expectations, and that the wells currently available for sampling were sufficient to evaluate natural attenuation in long term performance monitoring. A Monitored Natural Attenuation Plan (submitted to EPA in October 2002) was developed to include sampling a network of 18 bedrock wells for VOCs to effectively characterize contaminant levels (VOCs) in the bedrock aquifer within the contaminant plume as well as the surrounding area for the potential migration of contaminants from within the existing groundwater plume. The 18 bedrock wells to be included for groundwater sampling in each LTRA monitoring event include four bedrock monitor wells installed in December 1997 (MW-I through MW-4), the five private wells provided with carbon filtration units in August 2000 (MW-5 through MW-9), two community wells located west of Davis Park Road (MW-10 and MW-11), four converted wells (MW-12 through MW-15), and three private wells (MW-16 through MW-18). Monitor wells MW-2, MW-5, MW-6, MW-9, MW-12, MW-15, MW-16, MW-17, and MW-18 provide groundwater quality information within the contaminant plume. The remaining monitor wells K:120064 \ 138\Quarterty\secondquarterreport2.doc 2-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. lt shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. Seoond Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 2 Revision: O Date: January 2003 (MW-I, MW-3, MW-4, MW-7, MW-8, MW-10, MW-11, MW-13, and MW-14), located outside the contaminant plume, provide evidence of potential contaminant migration. Figure 2-1 provides the locations of the monitor well sampling network. Table 2-1 provides monitored natural attenuation sample designations cross-referenced with addresses and former designations. 2.1 OUARTERL Y GROUNDWATER MONITORING The purpose of quarterly groundwater monitoring is to verify the following: • That natural attenuation is occurring at rates according to expectations, • No changing conditions arise that might reduce efficacy of this remedy, • The continued absence of toxic and/or mobile transformation products, • Verification that the plume is not expanding, • Verification that there is no impact downgradient, • Detection of any new releases, and • Verification of attainment of remediation objectives. K:\200641138\Quarterlylsecondqua rterreport2.doc 2-2 - - --l!la!!I --!!!I!! ----lliill ------0 " D a a ◊ 0G ,-.... □ D o -v CJ 0 PRVD. DATE: 0 0 REVISION II 0 \ . ~ ---□□o □□□□ 0 \..--' 8PR]NOOROOI< ~ 0 □ DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA L TRA MONITOR WELL SAMPLING NETWORK FIGURE 2-1 0 D tll 0 0 (l = D IT i D D JD D 1 □ ~D D D I □ D □ CJ D D D D D □ 'i} D □" D =:;::::::::;:;~~ 3/\l'tl(J (flt(),U,tM-1 ..- DRAWN: DA TE: W.O. NO.: J. MILLER 6 5 02 20064-138-100-0910 LAYOUT: CAD□ FILE: SHEET: OF 2-1 DAVISPARK.dw 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. Sample ID Status MW-I monitor well MW-2 monitor well MW-3 monitor well MW-4 monitor well MW-5 carbon unit MW-6 carbon unit MW-7 carbon unit MW-8 carbon unit MW-9 carbon unit MW-10 community well MW-II community well MW-12 converted well MW-13 converted well MW-14 converted well MW-15 converted well MW-16 private MW-17 private MW-18 private Table 2-1 L TRA Monitor Well Sampling Network Davis Park Road TCE Site Former Designation(s) Street Address MW-ID S of Cedar Oak MW-2D 28 I 6 Davis Park MW-3D N of 2400 Skyland MW-4D 2415 Skyland CO-I, PW-2, 121 24 I 9 Davis Park CO-13, 235 2717 Davis Park 298 2839 Davis Park 252 2400 Skyland 182 2639 Springbrook CO-2, 300 2634 Skyland CO-3, 269 Briar Oak CW-5 Cedar Oak Subdivision 2719 Davis Park CW-6 Cedar Oak Subdivision 2241 Cedar Oak CW-4, 49 2403 Davis Park CW-7, 175 2232 Tate CO-5, 195 2725 Puritan CO-14, 286 28 I 6 Davis Park 192 2800 Davis Park K:\20064\138~econd quarterly\Tables Table 2·1 2-4 Depth (feet below eround surface) 75 54 150 142 187 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown 270 112 125 74 145 Unknown Unknown Unknown I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 2 Revision: O Date: January 2003 The samples are collected in accordance with the following documents: • Final Monitored Natural Attenuation Plan, dated October 2002, and • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science and Ecosystem Support Division (EPA- SESD), Region 4, revised Environmental Investigation Standard Operating procedure and Quality Assurance Manual (EISOPQAM), May 1996. All samples are analyzed by laboratories in the Contract Laboratory Program. Samples are analyzed for VOCs. 2.2 FIRST QUARTER LTRA SAMPLING EVENT The first quarter sampling event, performed in April 2002, was originally developed as the baseline event to establish current conditions and to evaluate the need for installation of additional wells. Based on analytical results, it was determined that the wells currently available for sampling were sufficient to evaluate natural attenuation in long term performance monitoring. Thirteen of the 18 wells selected for the sampling network and two additional wells were sampled in the baseline sampling event. Depth to water was recorded where possible (MW-1 through MW-4, MW-12 through MW-15) prior to sampling. Field parameters (pH, specific conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, oxidation reduction potential, and turbidity) were also recorded. Field measurements from the first quarter sampling event are summarized in Table 2-2. Field data sheets are included in Appendix A. Figure 2-2 provides a potentiometric surface map of the bedrock aquifer. The potentiometric map for the bedrock aquifer indicates the groundwater flow direction in the bedrock aquifer ranges from south to east across the site, with the strongest component of flow to the southeast. This is consistent with previously reported data. K:1200641138\Quarterty\secondquarterreport2. doc 2-5 -- - -- - - --------This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expl'8SS!y for EPA II shall not be disciosed, in whole or in part, without the express written pennission of EPA. Sample ID MW-1 MW-2 Former ID MW-1O MW-20 S of Street Locatior Cedar Oak 2816 DPR Screened lnterva 40-75 ft 21-54 Total Depth (record 75 54 Date 4/16/02 4/19/02 Total Oenth {measured 78.00 55.40 Too of Casino Elevation (ft msl 687.50 684.60 Death to Water fft 4.80 5.28 Water Elevation (ft msl 682.70 679.32 Temperature (t): 22.00 15.66 Conductivity (µ;/cm): 174 884 pH (standard units) 5.41 11.40 Eh (mV) 126.2 289.6 0.0. (mg/L) 2.84 3.91 Turbiditv lNTU 47.5 8.87 Notes: ft msl = feet above mean sea level ft =feel "C = degrees Centrigade mV = milliVolls NTU = nephelometric turbidity tJllits NM = not meastJred K:\20064\138'&,cond Quartet\Tables Tahiti 2-2 Table 2-2 First Quarter LTRA Field Parameter Measurement Summary Aprll 2002 Davis Park Road TCE Site MW-3 MW-4 MW-10 MW-11 MW-12 MW-3O MW-4O C0-2 C0-3 CW-5 N of Cedar Oak 2400 Skylan 2415 Skyland 2634 Skyland Subdivision 87-150 130-142 Unknown Unknown 70-112 150 142 270 Unknown 112 4/17/02 4/18/02 4/16/02 4/17/02 4/18/02 140.35 143 ~w 112.35 746.29 739.97 707.21 26.69 38.21 15.80 719.60 701.76 691.41 19.06 18.15 16.75 19.56 17.15 135 67 165 122 59 5.80 7.83 6.58 5.53 6.02 486.2 393.6 315 690.6 543.9 3.57 3.17 8.57 8.35 8.03 111.0 60.3 0.01 5.69 23.14 2-6 MW-13 MW-17 CW-6 C0-14 Cedar Oak Subdivision 2816 DPR 90-124.5 Unknown 124.5 Unknown 4/16/02 4/19/02 124.5 NM 705.8 NM 11.9 NM 693.86 NM 18.75 16.25 117 111 6.59 7.34 237.3 523.3 5.14 8.18 387.6 0.01 -- -- MW-18 2833 DPR CW-1 Sost 2800 DPR 2833 DPR Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown 4/18/02 4/18/02 4/17/02 NM NM ~ NM NM NM NM NM NM 18.67 17.73 17.5 142 138 141 5.65 6.06 6.2 618.5 647.5 115.3 5.42 7.89 6.9 23.32 1.11 568.7 N I --:i \\ 0 " 0 □ CJ CJ i □ ;:::======·::"":::y ~c:,, ~ 0 . □ a a D i 0 0 APRVD. DA TE: REVISION 0 D DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA <> POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOUR MAP BEDROCK AQUIFER APRIL 2002 0 □ D Cl D 'v □ C D () [i' ·o lo I □ D D D 0 D • ~ □ 0 D 1 □ D D □ □ □ □" ..a oo---t1♦m--c,-.-z 0 = r,: ~ " ~ ::;-::::;- ,_, """"""" -·· --·-- I ... * !il :::: I '3~ i ~ r .18 r r m ;j .... ;o r G> 0 m § Do r m "'~ ~ z ~o ~ 0 -C 0 ;o 0 1'!-z ;I ,i ! ORA'M'-1: CA TE: W.0. NO.: J. MILLER 6 5 02 20064-138-100-0910 LAYOUT: CAOO FILE: SHEET: OF Fi -2-2 DA~SPARK.dw 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ·1 I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 2 Revision: 0 Date: January 2003 Analytical data from the first quarterly LTRA sampling event is summarized in Table 2-3. Laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix B. TCE and PCE concentrations are presented graphically in Figure 2-3 and 2-4, respectively. The highest TCE concentration (14 g/1) was reported for water sampled from residential well MW-9. This well is currently supplied with a carbon filtration unit. TCE concentrations greater than the ROD performance standard (2.8 µg/1) were detected in four wells southeast of MW-9 (i.e., towards Blackwood Creek). The highest PCE concentration (8.6 µg/1) was detected in MW-18, adjacent to Blackwood Creek). PCE concentrations greater than the ROD performance standard ( 1 µg/1) were detected in two wells located in the central portion of the site (MW-12 at 1.6 µg/1 and MW-6 at 1.5 µg/1) and two wells in the southeast portion and toward Blackwood Creek (MW 17 at 5.7 µg/1 and MW-2 at 2.5 µg/1). No other constituents were detected at levels greater than the ROD performance standards. The analytical results suggest the contaminant plume is migrating slightly to the west and also southeast. Concentrations are significantly less than those detected in I 990 for wells in the northern and central portion of the plume. TCE decreased from 101.4 µg/1 in 1990 to 1.4 µg/1 in this sampling event in groundwater sampled from well MW-5, and PCE decreased from 34.9 µg/1 in 1990 to 1.6 µg/1 in this sampling event in groundwater sampled from MW-12. However, concentrations have increased slightly in wells to the west and southeast. TCE increased from 7.4 µg/1 in 2000 to 14 µg/1 in this sampling event in groundwater sampled from MW-9, and PCE increased from I µg/1 in 1990 to 5.7 µg/1 in this sampling event in groundwater sampled from well MW-17. These levels are consistent with a naturally attenuating plume that is shifting due to pumping (community wells on Skyland Drive and Briar Oak Drive located west of the site) and to a groundwater flow direction trending to the southeast and Blackwood Creek. K :\20064 I 138\Quarterly\secondq uarterreport2. doc 2-8 ------ - - - - - - - - - This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA It shall not be disclosed, In whole or In par1, without the express written permission of EPA Sample Identification: MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 S of 2816 N of 2400 Location: Cedar Oak DPR Skyland Date St1mi:led: 4/16/2002 4/19/2002 4/17/2002 Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1) Acetone <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 <0.50 12 cis 1,2-0ichloroethene <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Chloroform <0.50 0.44J <5.0 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane <0.50 0.48J <5.0 Trichloroethene <0.50 3.0 <5.0 Methylcyclohexane <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Toluene <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Tetrachtoroethene <0.50 2.5 <5.0 Mlscel/aneous Vo/at/le Organic Compounds (ug/1) Unknown Compound ND 0.60J ND Fluorotrimethyl Silane ND 3.8JN NO 2 Unknown Comcounds 1.6J ND 1.4J Note: Holding limes for MW•10 and MW-13 wera exceeded Table 2-3 First Quarter LTRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary Aprll 2002 Davis Park Road TCE Site MW_. MW-5 MW .. MW-9 MW-10 MW-11 2415 2419 2717 2639 2634 2506 Skyland DPR DPR Springbrook Sltyland Briar Oak 4/17/2002 4117/2002 4/17/2002 4/17/2002 4/16/2002 4/17/2002 <5.0 <0.50 12 <0.50 <5.0 11 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 1.1 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 1.4 1.6 14 <0.50 <0.50 0.48J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.18J <5.0 0.18J <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 1.5 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 1.6J 0.71J 0.91J ND ND 0.59J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Only constituents thal were detected in at least one sample during the baseline sampling event ara induded in this table J indicates estimated value N indicates presumptive evidence of presence of material ND indicates Not Detected Balded values exceed ROD Performance Standards DPR indicales Davis Par1< Road Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol. K:\20064\138\Seoond ~Tables Table 2.3 2-9 MW-12 2719 DPR 4/18/2002 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.38J 3.0 <0.50 <0.50 1.6 1.3J ND ND MW013 MW-17 22◄1 Cedar 2816 Oak DPR 4/16/2002 4/19/2002 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.31J <0.50 0.65 <0.50 12 <0.50 <0.50 0.17J <0.50 <0.50 5.7 ND ND ND ND 1.6J ND - - - - MW-18 2800 231◄ 2833 OPR Hedgewood Penny Park 4/18/2002 4/1712002 4/18/2002 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 4.3 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 8.6 <0.50 <0.50 ND 0.82J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND - --111.i .. lilll -1!!!!!11 --l!!!!!!l!I --l!!!!!!!!!I .. ---- N I -0 0 0 0 CJ 0 APRVD. DATE: \) 0 0 0 D REVISION □ I] 0 0 0 0 0 ~·□ 't»o c:r· \\ \) 0 " D DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA TCE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER APRIL 2002 □ 0 [j' D ~□ D z ~□ D z ~□ [J a 0 □ D 'i) D • ~ □ 0 D i □ C m D □ 0 □ 0 □" D ~ "'----i♦llllllllt~-z 0 = c:>. ., •• ~ 0 0 ,, 0 0 " 3NMC1 m!OJ..lHVH z :, ..., z 0 m ;a 0 ..., r c'i ..., "' r :,; a ~ r r m 0 0 ..., " " ;a m r ~ 0 " m m iii a 0 ..., a r z :,; rn m z G) m " rn 0 z z " CJ m z ! 0 z "' z C ,g, DRAWN: DATE: W.0. NO.: J. MILLER 6/5/02 20064-138-100-0910 LAYOUT: CADD FILE: SHEET: OF Fi -2-3 DAVISPARK.dw 1 1 - - - ----n!!!I 1!!!!!!!11 -l!!!!!!I l!!llll .. -.. ----\\ 0 " 0 □ □ □ □ ~ I EHN'r CJ t:J, t::} □ Q w,' D □ ◊ 0~ ,,.... □ D o -v 0 0 .... APRVD. DA TE: REVISION ◊ 0 CJ i\. D ◊ 0 ◊ ◊ 0 0 ~ 0 \) ~ ~ ~ \) \\ • \\, 6 □ \\ .a ~ 0 CJ □ oo □ o a □ DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA PCE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER APRIL 2002 [j' o ·o 0 lo D I □ CJ D D 0 'v D D D D D □ -· DRAWN: DA TE: 0 0 I □ a 1 □ 0 D □" -··- J. MILLER 6 5 02 LAYOUT: CADD FILE: "' - Fi -2-4 DAVISPARK.dw 0 = ~ «>· ~ ~ a ~ =:;::::::- a.we °"°'"""' -· -- z * -z .£? -_g z ~ i z 0 0 -I r -I "' r 0 ~ r 0 i § :t ~ r 0 "' ~ 0 r ~ m m G') z m m z 0 0 0 z 0 m ~ ~ "' z ,§, W.O. NO.: 20064-138-100-0910 SHEET: OF 1 1 ··•·· . .,,. . .. .. . , •'·• ,,, ... ., .- -~ • -i' ;"~ ,,,.:, ·•· .... ' •. : I • •: 3 · •• ~ ·./!·: ' . ··-.. ,, ·•• .. .:.· ' ,· ~ ·-:-· -,, . . "\ .. ~ .. ..... ) . ,/ ..1,;;-, ~·---~ '~ , •. ;.!' ,.. . ·: . ' ~ .. :.,._ . . . ' d,. '· :;'. ~,;. ,-·. -:. .. .,"\-, ,, . .,· '·':. ';,' ~. -~ :·· ~;1·._: ... ·,. . .~ ' {, •, :.~ .;.:• /·/,v :,._-; . . : ..... . __.., . ' ,:.,..,..:_ . ~'-•.~ " ; ..,_ ,, .. -.... . . :_:.-_. ~ ,.: .. . : . ··/ .. r .';_- T -.: ' .::,,::;-_;-.::· .• . , ., ·(.~--:-. . ., ~-~ >.:,·:~· . ~~ • . \··•. · .. • •: _. • l' ,·.-.. .,:_.,..-,··_.,: ~.,. -:r:' ·.< 'i-. . ,-,. -·.'.., -.. ;' .. ,_: I· ., . ·.,.. \. j ::·. ~ ~· : ,; . " '·:·;": ·. z.-,~ ,:' .:; '~ : . .-. •'' t '•. t, .. . -- I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. SECTION 3 Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Par1< Road TCE Site Section: 3 Revision: O Date: January 2003 SECOND QUARTER LTRA SUMMARY 3.1 GROUNDWATERSAMPLING 3.1.1 Monitor Well Sampling WESTON mobilized to the site the week of 23 September 2002. Groundwater samples were collected from the 18-monitor well network from 23 September through 26 September 2002. Monitor wells MW-I through MW-4 and MW-12 through MW-15 were sampled in accordance with Puls and Barcelona (1996) Low-Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Groundwater Sampling Procedures published by the EPA Superfund Technology Support Center for Ground Water using a MicroPurge bladder pump. Water level and field parameter measurements (pH, specific conductivity, temperature, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation/reduction potential) were recorded on field data sheets which are included in Appendix A. Pump intake was lowered to well screen depth, and the well was micro-purged until field parameters stabilized. Laboratory samples for VOC analysis were then collected in pre-labeled, pre-preserved sample bottles. Bottles were capped appropriately, placed in a Ziploc-type bag, and stored in an ice cooled container prior to shipment to the CLP designated laboratory, A4 Scientific located in the Woodlands, Texas. All downhole equipment was decontaminated after use in each well. Purge water was collected and transported to stationary containment located on the property behind the Davis Park Auto Repair facility pending sample analysis for determination of method of disposal. K:120064 I 138\Quarterlylsecondquarterreport2.doc 3-1 I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. 3.1.2 Community and Private Well Sampling Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 3 Revision: o Date: January 2003 Community wells MW-10 and MW-I I and private wells MW-5 through MW-9 and MW-15 through MW-18 were purged and sampled from the in-situ pumping system, but prior to any filter mechanism that may have been in place. Wells were purged at approximately I gallon per minute for a period of approximately 15 minutes. Turbidity, pH, specific conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation/reduction potential were measured approximately every 5 minutes during the purge process. Purging continued until parameters were stable for three successive readings, and samples were collected as described above. Field parameter data sheets are included in Appendix A. 3.1.3 Field Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples One rinse blank and one field blank were collected during the baseline sampling event. The rinse blank was collected by pouring distilled water over the submersible pump. The field blank was collected proximal to a MW-3 by pouring distilled water directly from the container into the sample container. One field duplicate was collected from MW-8. All samples were analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260. Analytical results for the QNQC samples are summarized in Table 3-1. Chloroform was detected in the trip blanks and also in groundwater samples. Associated groundwater samples for which chloroform was also detected were flagged. Chloroform was not detected at significant levels in any oft he groundwater samples.No other constituents that were detected in blanks were also detected in groundwater samples. Duplicate results were within acceptable relative percent differences. K:120064 \ 138\Quarterty\secondquarterreport2 .doc 3-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express writ1en permission ot EPA. Table 3-1 Second Quarter L TRA QA/QC Laboratory Analytical Results Summary September 2002 Davis Park Road TCE Site Sample Identification: MW01TB Date Sampled: 9/24/02 Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1) Chloroform 1.4 Bromodichloromethane 0.29J Bromoform <5.0 Trichloroethene <5.0 Toluene <5.0 Tetrachloroethene <5.0 Ethylbenzene <5.0 Total Xylenes <5.0 Miscellaneous Volatile Organic Compounds (ugll) Cyc!otrisiloxane, Hexamethyl Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octameth Benzene, 1,2,4-Trimethy1 Nonadecane lsobutane Smnples were analyzed following CLP protocol. Noles: ND ND ND ND 1.9JN MW02TB MW01RB 9/26/02 9/25/02 1.4 1.4 0.30J 0.29J <5.0 0.23J <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.4JN MW3FB I MW-18 9/26/02 9/25/02 duplicate 1.6 <0.50 <0.50 0.38J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 6.1 6.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 10 10 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1.BJN ND ND Only constituents Iha! were detected in at least one sample during the baseline sampling event are included in ttiis table J indicates estimated value N indicates presumptive evidence o1 presence of material ND indica1es Not Detected B indicates constituent was detected in blank Balded values exceed EPA MCLs K:\200(,.j\ I JX\sc•c·, ,ml q11:11 l~r I) \Tahk.,. ,Is Tahlc J-1 I MW1PW 9/26/02 <50 <50 <50 <50 31J <50 120 64 78J 140J 73JN 94JN ND I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written pem,ission of EPA 3.2 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 3 Revision: 0 Date: January 2003 Depth to water was recorded for monitor wells MW-I through MW-4, and wells MW-12 through MW-15) prior to sampling. Field parameters (pH, specific conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, oxidation reduction potential, and turbidity) were recorded during sampling of all wells. Field measurements from the first and second quarter sampling events are summarized in Table 3-2. Field data sheets are included in Appendix A. Figure 3-1 provides a potentiometric surface map of the bedrock aquifer. Consistent with the first quarter LTRA event and previously reported data, groundwater flow direction in the bedrock aquifer appears to range from south to east across the site, with the strongest component of flow to the southeast. 3.3 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS 3.3.1 Groundwater Samples TCE and PCE were the only VOC constituents to exceed the ROD Performance Standards in groundwater samples collected during the 2nd Quarter LTRA sampling event. TCE and PCE concentrations were both detected in groundwater sampled from 9 wells, but exceeded the Performance Standard of 2.8 µg/L (TCE) and I µg/L (PCE) in only 5 groundwater samples. TCE exceeded the ROD Performance Standard in the following samples: MW-2 (6.1 µg/L), MW-9 (8.6 µg/L), MW-15 (50 µg/L), MW-17 (13 µg/L), andMW-18 (6.1 µg/L). PCE exceeded the ROD Performance Standard in the following samples: MW-2 (3.7 µg/L), MW-6 (1.2 µg/L), MW-12 (I.I µg/L), MW-17 (5.7 µg/L), and MW-18 (10 µg/L). Laboratory analytical results for first and second quarter L TRA sampling events are summarized in Table 3-3. The results are K:1200641138\Qua rtertylsecondquarterreport2. doc 3-4 - - --111!!!!1 ---.. --.. liililil --.. --- w I "' 0 " 0 □□e:i I □ ~=======··==··:::-(r::::, r::, c:, □ □ a □ ◊ 0~ ,.._ □ D a -v D APRVD. DA TE: REVISION \l "' <> C> 0 <> 0 0 <> 0 <> C \) • \ • ~ \p ~ 0 0 CJ 0 0 <::>.,""· 0 ~ IT I □ 0 ·o D I □ □ 1 □ 8 ~ D I □ D 0 0 ~ l'.J D □ ::::::::' D D □ □ 3/Jll(I""°"""" 'i) Ci □" D .. -··-0 ---_ .. -· --.-··-·--··-· □ DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOUR MAP BEDROCK AQUIFER SEPTEMBER 2002 I .... * & ::: I .3 ~ J ~ ,.... ii18 iii ... ... m ~ ... :0 ... on m § G) ;::O ... m ~~ ~ z ~ 0 0 :0 !f ~Ii DRA'WN: DA TE: W.O. NO.: J. MILLER 6 5 02 20064-138-100-0910 LAYOUT: CAOQ FILE: SHEET: OF Fi -3-1 DAVISPARK.dw 1 1 - ---- - -- - --- - --This document was prapared by W~\on Solutions, Inc., exprussly for EPA II shall not be disclosed, in whole or In part, without the express written permission of EPA. Sample ID Former ID Street Location Screened Interval Total Depth (record)· Date: Total Depth (measured): Top of Casing Elevation (ft msl) Depth to Water. Water Elevation lft msl Temperature (°C). Conductivity (µs/cm): pH: Eh(mV): D.O. (mg/L): Turbiditv (NTUl: Notes: ft msl = feet above mean sea level ft"' feet °C = degrees Centngade mV=mi!INolts NTU = nephelometric turbidity units NM = not measured MW-1 MW-10 S of Cedar Oak 40-75 ft 75 4/16/02 I 9/24/02 76.00 79.1 667.50 4.60 5.9 662.70 661.60 22.00 16.66 174 245 5.41 7.02 126.2 -23.4 2.84 3.88 47.5 61.62 K:\20064\138\Second Quarter.Tab~ Table 3-2 Tabla 3-2 First and Second Quarter Field Parameter Measurement Summary April and September 2002 Davis Park Road TCE Sita MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6 MW-2D MW-30 MW-4O C0-1/PW-2 C0-13 2816 CPR N of 2400 Skyland 2415 Skytand 2419 CPR 2717 CPR 21-54 87-150 130-142 187 Unknown 54 150 142 Unknown Unknown 4/19/02 I 9/25/02 4/17/02 t 9/24/02 4/18/02 I 9/24/02 9/23/02 9/23/02 55.40 I 55.6 140.35 147.4 143 I 142.2 ~~ 664.60 746.29 739.97 NM 5.26 7.1 26.69 31.1 36.21 40.1 NM 679.32 677.50 719.60 715.19 701.76 699.67 NM 15.66 16.55 19.06 17.05 18.15 16.61 17.86 17.91 884 593 135 156 67 198 263 150 11.40 12.17 5.60 6.29 7.63 6.16 6.12 6.25 269.6 67.6 486.2 69.1 393.6 -124.7 160.2 140.7 3.91 3.35 3.57 2.96 3.17 2.39 6.61 7.79 6.67 11.61 111.0 663 60.3 19.4 NM 10.5 3-6 MW-7 MW-8 2837 DPR 2400 Skyland Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown 9/23/02 9/23/02 NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM 17.00 17.22 193 179 6.11 6.61 142.6 160.4 6.09 6.67 NM 12.22 ---- MW-9 MW-10 C0-2 2639 Springbrook 2634 Skyland Unknown Unknown Unknown 270 9/23/02 4/16/02 9/24/02 ~~ NM NM NM 17.16 16.75 16.62 238 165 242 6.36 6.58 6,65 156.9 315 163.0 7.84 8.57 7.95 12.57 0.01 NM ------- --- - -- --- --This document was prepar&d by Weston Solutions, Inc., exprassly for EPA II shall not be disdosed, In whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA Sample ID· Former ID Street Locetion Screened Interval Total Depth (record): Date: Total Depth (measured)· Top of Casing Elevation (fl msl) Depth to Water: Water Elevation (fl msl Temperature {"C): Conductivity (µs/cm): pH: Eh (mV) 0.0. (mgll). Turbidity (NTU): Notes: ft msl = feet above mean sea level ft =feet "c = degrees Centrigade mV = milJiVol!s NTU = nephelomelric turbidily units NM "' not measured MW-11 C0-3 Unknown Unknown 4/17/02 9/24/02 NM NM NM NM 19.56 16.86 122 198 5.53 6.38 690.6 162.1 8.35 9.26 5.69 NM K:\20064\138\Seeond Quartm.Tablct Table 3-2 MW-12 CW-5 Cedar Oak Subdivision 70-112 112 4/18/02 9/25/02 112.35 111.8 707.21 15.80 21.4 691.41 685.81 17.15 17.01 59 123 6.02 6.04 543.9 153.4 8.03 8.07 23.14 148.1 Table 3-2 (continued) First and Second Quarter Field Parameter Measurement Summary April and September 2002 Davis Park Road TCE Site MW-13 MW-14 MW-15 MW-16 MW-17 MW-18 2833 DPR CW-1 CW-6 CW-4 CW-7 C0-5 C0-14 Cedar Oak Subdivision 2403 OPR 2332 Tate 2816 DPR 2800 CPR 2833 DPR 90-124.5 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown 124.5 74 Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown 4/16/02 I 9/26/02 9/25/02 9/26/02 9/26/02 4/19/02 I 9/24/02 4/18/02 I 9/25/02 4/18/02 4/17/02 124.5 I 124.5 TT.2 143.3 m~mmm 705.8 768.75 NM NM NM NM NM 11.9 17 .1 53.5 12.4 NM NM NM NM 693.86 688.66 715.25 NM NM NM NM NM 18.75 16.51 16.90 17.66 17.18 16.25 15.93 18.67 17.05 17.73 17.5 117 155 178 210 213 111 185 142 224 138 141 6.59 7.36 6.08 6.17 5.93 7.34 6.09 5.65 6.15 6.06 6.2 237.3 -18.0 123.9 95.4 113.8 523.3 164 618.5 157.2 647.5 115.3 5.14 2.61 3.90 7.17 5.70 8.18 10.7 5.42 5.03 7.89 6.9 387.6 7.16 319.4 531.0 19.04 0.01 5.56 23.32 143.1 1.11 568.7 3.7 - ---- - - - - - - - - - This document was prepared by Weston Solutions. Inc .. expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part withOut the express wrillen permission o! EPA. Table 3-3 First and Second Quarter L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary April and September 2002 Davis Park Road TCE Site Sample Identification· MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 S of 2616 N of 2400 Location Cedar Oak DPR Skyland Date Sampled· 4/16/02 9{24/02 4/19/02 9/25/02 4/17/02 9/24/02 Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1) 1, 1-0ichloroethene <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.51 <0.50 <0.50 Acetone <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Carbon Disulfide <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE) <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 12 14 1, 1-0ichloroethane <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 cis 1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Chloroform <0.50 <0.50 0.44J 0.52B <5.0 <0.50 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane <0.50 <0.50 0.48J 0.58 <5.0 <0.50 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 h'richloroethene <0.50 <0.50 3.0 6.1 <5.0 <0.50 Methylcyclohexane <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 !Toluene <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 !T etrachloroethene <0.50 <0.50 2.5 3.7 <5.0 0.22J 1,4-0ichlorobenzene <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Miscellaneous Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1) Unknown Compound NO ND 0.60J ND ND ND Fluorotrimethyl Silane ND ND 3.BJN ND ND ND Propene ND ND ND ND ND ND 1-Hexanol, 2-Ethyl-ND ND ND ND ND ND Butylated Hydroxytoluene ND 0.69JN ND ND ND ND 2 Unknown Compounds 1.6J ND ND ND ND ND Note: Holding times for MW-10 and MW-13 were exceeded for April 2002 Sampling event Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during the baseline sampling event are included in this table J indicates estimated value N indicates presumptive evidence of presence of material ND indicates Not Detected Balded values exceed ROD Performance Standards DPR indicates Davis Park Road Samples were analyzed following CLP pro1ocol. 1.::\2(1116.J\ 1 .'~\Scnmd VuancrlRcplaccmcn1 for Ta hie .'-.'.xi< T ahlc -~-~ 3-8 MW-4 2415 Skyland 4/17/02 9/24102 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 OABJ <0.50 0.18J <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 1.6J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 3.9JN ND ND MW·S 2419 DPR 4117/02 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 1.4 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 0.71J ND ND ND ND ND 9/23/02 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 1.9 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 ND ND ND ND ND NO - - - --- MW-6 MW-7 MW-8 MW-9 2717 2837 2400 2639 DPR DPR Skyland Springbrook 4/17/02 9/23/02 9/23/02 9/23/02 4/17/02 9/23/02 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 12 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.17J 1.8 <0.50 0.16J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 1.1 0.67 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 0.16 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.44J 1.6 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 14 8.6 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.18J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 1.5 1.2 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 0.36J <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 0.91J ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ----- - - --- - - - - - This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. 11 shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, v.ithout the express written permission of EPA. Sample Identification: Location: Date Sampled: Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1) 1, 1-Dichloroethene Acetone Carbon Disulfide Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE) .1-Dichloroethane is 1.2-Dichloroethene !Chloroform 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1 ,2-Dichloroethane ITrichloroethene Methylcyclohexane !Toluene IT etrachloroethene 1,4-0ichlorobenzene miscellaneous Volatile Organic Compounds {t Unknown Compound Fluorotrimethyl Silane Propene 1-Hexanol, 2-Ethyl- Butylated Hydroxytoluene 2 Unknown Compounds Note: Holding times for MW-10 and MW-13 were exceed, Only constituents that were detected in at least one J indicates estima1ed value N indicates presumptive evidence of presence of m ND indicates Not Detected Balded values exceed ROD Performance Standard DPR indicates Davis Park Road Samples were analyzed lollov.ing CLP protocol. MW-10 MW-11 2634 2506 Skyland Briar Oak 4/16/02 9/24/02 4/17/02 9/24/02 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 11 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.47J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.16J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.18J <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 ND ND 0.59J ND NO NO ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO NO NO ND ND ND ND ND Table 3-3 First and Second Quarter L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary April and September 2002 Davis Park Road TCE Site MW-12 MW-13 MW-14 MW-15 MW-16 2719 2241 2403 2232 2725 DPR Cedar Oak DPR Tate Puritan 4/18/02 9/25102 4/16/02 9/26/02 9/25/02 9/26/02 9/26/02 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.15J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.29J <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.25J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.20J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 3.6 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 0.38J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 3.0 2.3 <0.50 <0.50 0.49J 50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.17J 0.19J <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 1.6 1.1 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.31J <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.33J 1.3J ND ND NO 0.72J ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.84JN NO 0.61JN ND ND ND NO 0.72JN ND ND ND ND ND ND 2.BJN ND 3.3JN NO ND NO 1.6J ND ND ND ND 3-9 ----- MW-17 MW-18 2816 2800 DPR DPR 4/19/02 9/24/02 4/18/02 9/25/02 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <5.0 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.47J <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.31J 0.25JB <5.0 <0.50 0.65 0.47J <5.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 12 13 4.3 6.1 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <5.0 <0.50 5.7 5.7 8.6 10 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 ND ND ND ND NO ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NO ND NO NO ND ND ND NO NO ND I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 3 Revision: O Date: January 2003 summarized graphically in Figures 3-2 and 3-3 for TCE and PCE, respectively. Laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix B. The highest TCE concentration (50 µg/L) was detected in groundwater sampled from monitor well MW-15, located at the west central portion of the site. This well was not sampled during the first quarter sampling event. The second highest TCE concentration (13 µg/L) was detected in groundwater collected from monitor well MW-17, located at the far southeastern corner of the site, adjacent to Blackwood Creek. The TCE concentration increased slightly (by 1 µg/L) from the first quarter sampling event. The highest PCE concentration (10 µg/L) was detected in groundwater sampled from MW-18, also located near the southeast corner of the site. This concentration is also slightly higher (by 1 .4 µ g/L) than that detected in groundwater sampled from this well during the first quarter sampling event. TCE concentrations decreased from levels detected in the first quarter sampling event in three locations (MW-6, MW-9, and MW-12, located in the central portion of the site) and increased in 5 locations (MW-2, MW-5, MW-IO, MW-17, and MW-18). Two of these latter wells (MW-5 and MW-10) are located at the northwestern upgradient edge of the plume. The remaining three are located downgradient of the plume center at the southern and eastern portion of the site. PCE concentrations decreased from levels detected in the first quarter sampling event in two locations (MW-6 and MW-12, located in the central portion of the site) and increased in 5 locations (MW- 2, MW-3, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-18). Two of these latter wells (MW-3 and MW-10) are located at the northwestern upgradient portion of the site, and MW-9 is located in the central portion of the site. The remaining two are located at the southeastern downgradient portion of the site. K:\20064\ 138\Quarterly\secondquarterreport2. doc 3-10 w I .... .... \\ 0 0 a □□e:i I eNNy C::, C:, 0 a □ Cl Q w' a o □~ ,...._ □ D a ......, 0 0 ◊ ◊ t::J ◊ ◊ ◊◊ ◊ C 0 \) 0 \) \) \) \) \)~ • ro\ .,, ,. . 6 p '> 0 0 Cl 0 \. □ 0 □ □ DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 0 TCE CONCENTRATIONS IN ---t---t----------1 GROUNDWATER SEPTEMBER 2002 APRVD. DA TE: RE~SION 0 [i' D •□ 0 lo D I □ CJ D o D 'Q, D D ·~ a~ Ii D D D D "' 0 aQ D ID 0 I □ D D □" 0 = 8 0 ~ ,11>• ~ 0 ¥ " ~ ~ """' O>IOfilM< ~ ~ z r " ~ r :,: 0 r r i § 0 :0 0 ~ ~ m z m 8 z " m I i z ,§, DRAWN: DATE! W.0. NO.: r m G) m z 0 J. MILLER 6 5 02 20064-138-100-0910 LAYOUT: CAOO FILE: SHEET: OF Fi -3-2 DAVISPARK.dw 1 1 ---11!!!11 a111 --MIi .. -D1!1 -11111 m!I 1!!!!!11 liiil liiill -- □ □ 0 0 □ ◊ 0~ ,-.._ □ D o 'V D 0 ' ' ◊ \} 0 CJ i\. □ 0 {> t:J ◊ ◊ 0 0 ~ 0 \) ~ ~-\) \) \) • .. \ ·i~ 6 ~p \,, 0 0 C. 0 □ □ DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 0 PCE CONCENTRATIONS IN .----+---+--------1 GROUNDWATER SEPTEMBER 2002 APRVD. DA TE: REVISION C D IT D "D 0 lo D I □ CJ D o D 'i) D D ~! Ii □ D □ D -· - 0 QQ D • i D 0 i □ D D □" --··- 0 8 Cl ~ ,;>• ff' ~ 0 ~ c;:::::::- a.we """'"""' .-··--· * -z -_g ~ i z r ~ r 0 r ~ ~ :c r 0 ~ "' 0 0 z ~ "' z "' 8 z fJ ! i z ~ DRAWN: DA TE: W.O. NO.: r m (i") m z 0 J. MILLER 6 5/02 20064-138-100-0910 LAYOUT: CADD FILE: SHEET: OF Fi -3-3 DAVISPARK.dw 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. 3.3.2 Purge Water Sample Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 3 Revision: 0 Date: January 2003 Purge water was contained in a drum previously stored at the property behind the Davis Park Auto facility. Following sampling activities the drum was sampled for voe analysis to determine proper disposal. The analytical results for the purge water sample are summarized in Table 3-1. The purge water results indicate levels of constituents not representative of site contaminants (i.e., ethlybenzene, xylenes, toluene). The purge water sample from the first quarter sampling event had contained no voes exceeding the state or federal drinking water standards and was discharged to the ground during the second groundwater sampling event field activities. Because the containment drum had been stored at a residence between sampling events, and was not secured against tampering, it is likely the drum had been used previously to store materials containing contaminants reported in the purge water analytical results. The drum contents, profiled as non-hazardous, will be transported and disposed appropriately. K:\20064 \ 138\Quarterly\secondquarterreport2 .doc 3-13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. SECTION 4 Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Site Section: 4 Revision: O Date: January 2003 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 LTRA RESULTS SUMMARY The source for the TCE/PCE contamination in groundwater at the Davis Park Road TCE Site is depleted or removed based on groundwater sampling results reported from the time of contaminant discovery (I 990) to the current LTRA second quarter sampling event in September 2002. Water sampled from wells north of Skyland Drive and in the Cedar Oak Circle Subdivision contained concentrations of between 44 and 134 µg/L TCE and up to 24 µg/L PCE when sampled in 1990. Water sampled from these same wells did not contain concentrations of TCE or PCE at concentrations greater than the ROD remedial groundwater clean-up goals of 2.8 µg/L and 1 µg/L, respectively. Although TCE and PCE concentrations in some wells located south and west of the source area have increased, contaminant concentrations are significantly lower than those detected in the source area at the time of the initial discovery in all but one well location. Groundwater sampled from monitor well MW-15, located southwest of the source area, contained 50 µg/L TCE during the current sampling event. Excluding this groundwater sample, the maximum TCE concentration for groundwater samples collected during the second quarter LTRA sampling event is 13 µg/L in groundwater sampled from well MW-17, and the maximum PCE concentration (including the sample for MW-15) is 10 µg/L in groundwater sampled from well MW-18. Both wells MW-17 and MW-18 are located on the south and southeast portion of the site approaching Blackwood Creek, suggesting groundwater contamination continues to attenuate as it migrates toward this natural groundwater discharge area. K:120064 I 138\Quarterlylsecondq uarterreport2.doc 4-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Park Road TCE Sile Section: 4 Revision: O Date: January 2003 Concurrently with the migration toward Blackwood Creek, there appears to be contaminant migration southwest of the source area. Although pumping of groundwater has been discontinued over most of the Davis Park Road TCE site area, two community wells (MW-I 0 and MW-I I) are currently still active near Briar Oak Drive, west of the site. Community well MW-I 0, located on Skyland Drive, supplies between 30 and 40 people, and MW-11, located on Briar Oak Drive, supplies approximately nine people, according to Mr. Doc Thompson of the Gaston County Health Department. Pumping of these wells may facilitate migration of groundwater contaminants in a westerly direction. Monitor well MW-15 is located southwest of the source area, with Davis Park Road to the east and well MW-9 to the southwest. TCE was detected at a concentration of 34 µg/L in groundwater sampled from this well in February 1998 and at a concentration of 50 µg/L in groundwater sampled during the second quarter LTRA sampling event. These concentrations are similar to previous levels detected in groundwater sampled from converted community well MW-12 (located east and downgradient of the source area). TCE concentrations fluctuated between approximately 30 and 50 µg/L in groundwater sampled from MW-12 from 1990 through 1998. TCE was detected at 2.3 µg/L in groundwater sampled from MW-12 during this groundwater sampling event. TCE concentrations in groundwater sampled from well MW-9 ( currently supplied with a carbon filtration unit) have fluctuated since August 2000 when first sampled, but have ranged from 6.8 µg/L ( detected in November 2001) to 14 µg/L (detected in April 2002). These levels are similar to groundwater samples collected from wells MW-18, located further south and downgradient of the source area toward Blackwood Creek. 4.2 CONCLUSIONS TCE and PCE concentrations continue to decrease in the contaminant plume as it migrates south and away from the source area. Additionally, no additional degradation products of these two constituents were detected at any significant level in any of the groundwater samples collected K:120064 \ 138\Quarterty\secondquarterreport2. doc 4-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA. Second Quarter Sampling Event Report Davis Part< Road TCE Site Section: 4 Revision: 0 Date: January 2003 historically or during the LTRA quarterly sampling events. These findings support the groundwater concept model (EPA Memorandum25 September 2000) that the primary mechanism for the observed natural attenuation of the TCE plume at Davis Park Road is dilution as contamination essentially flushes through the bedrock aquifer. The analytical results are consistent with the proposed cleanup time of 14 years (by the year 2017) to attain EPA MCLs. In conclusion, the Second Quarter LTRA sampling event results confirmed that natural attenuation is occurring at rates according to expectations, no changing conditions have arisen that might reduce efficacy of this remedy, no toxic and/or mobile transformation products are being produced, the plume is not expanding, there is no impact downgradient, there 1s no evidence of a new release, and source area wells have attained remediation objectives. 4.3 RECOMMENDATIONS Quarterly sampling of the 18-well network should continue for one year to confirm findings of the first and second quarters, and to monitor further migration of the plume west toward the currently active community wells. K:1200641138\Quartertylsecondquarterreport2 .doc 4-3 .,-. .;..,., ..::·: ···•' (:-, ) ·>· '.• ·' .. · '· :-,-;,:~ ' :' ·- '• , · ·:.'f « -" .:.\:·})i1::) .. '. - .?,_ '_:,.;• ... .,_. 1·, j ; ·, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I K:\20064\l38\Quarterly\secondquarterreport2.doc APPENDIX A FIELD DAT A SHEETS .___tpr ... ,r>,~ ~"'c\ p..._r~e-·. O"f !>~ EXAMPLE (Minimum Re~irements) Well PT~f:IN(:;-FIF.LD WZ1T1"R mmr TY ,_,, - - - Page_l_of / -- Location (Sire/~cility Name) ~ Iv\ ~~1.,;.). ~r~ TCE Sit-e--Depth to / of screen Well NUlllber n-~ Dai:;e '"111~ "'"' (below MP) to~ bottom Field Personne.1. ,. "'" Mnul\1..1. / Tcu,.:L ,,._ m,,,..,,,, Pump Intake at (f . below MP) Sampl~ng Organiza, ion "'"' ~ I nkl . Purging Device; (pump type) sr,Gkef Identify MP Clock Water ~~1 Purge Cum. Temp. Spec. pH ON'/ DO Turb-Comments Time De~th Rate Volume Cond. 2 Eh idity be ow Purged MP 24 HR ft ml/min liters •c µS/cm mv mq/L NTU Cftota ~ -I ~""I"' i ~ l l&.4~ 171-/ 7"15 JJJI. ~ 7 ~I ~-~ \ 09 l \ ~ -I \41 /Mi" ' ' l~.7(.. I~ ci ~-~, ?.'-flo.D 7~l (rtli;,'1 O"I I 1i, --\ °-\( l/M;., 11 1,_7'3. (&1 o.~5 i/p3, ~ 7.9 r; o. \~ -- {01t1/II« () Ii 1. . veil 0420; f"'"'f iJ,.,._\-ot-1'. Oi~'i &..t k C,\ \;., .e., o,~s --I ~<ti /""i~ I (p l~,11 liD ~.(,(p ;;.~.7 t~I o.Js 04~0 -\11,, l /r-t;~ ~, /fo.LJ)~ 1~7 10.,6 3/JJ,, i 1(.&i 0.0 I - (/13.5 --1~11"";,, di&, I&. I=> 1~5 ,.s<g ?.15. O o. 5 / -....._ .. 1. Pump dial setting (for example: hertzi cycles/min, etc). 2. µSiemens per-cm(same as µmhos/cm)at 2:> •c. 3. oxidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). :lock Water· ~1 Purge eum. Temp. Spec. 2 pH :ime De~th Rate Volume Cond. be ow Purged MP ml/min liters ~ 40. 'E:\( (I/\ [(} I ~PM 45 I ~P~ t.0-1 '?JP"'\ I~ Q.[ ~f M 1, .rr zo./~rM .5 Pul!JP dial setting (for ex~le: hertzt cycles/min, etc). µSiemens per cm(same as µmhos/cm) at 2::, •c. oxidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). - - - - - Page_of __ ON'/ DO Turb-Comments Eh id.ity ' ,6 .S, l '),__{p _-; -I , i.?C, ? (p 7. '3, 5. !l{ -t~c6;J; m:,{cr- .u~-"" w ... --v_.. bo+-\--ul"" 0 ~ vc\\-:.. 7f. rJ0 1 w .. 11 EXAMPLE (Mln •Nr-FIEr,n Wl!. um R1'¥J.;ements) /'IT nl T Ml:' l!, l<nRM Page_of __ ..ocation (Site/Facility Name) l'iav:~ Ptil' lz TC e ~i]-_e, lell Number 11,11,1,11\ D,J1-1.e"i111 .. ,,.~ 'ield Persouue.1. v.11-i f11~WI-'-/ J.«M·,~, !',~AW-_,;) Depth to f~Q I i5 of screen (below MP)t~ ttorn ;~ling Organiza1.ion Pump Intake at ( • below MP) Purging Device; (pump type) t;i 19)Mt p..,_Y"l f :dentify MP lAI\-, ,r<:,''-1 ---------------------------- :lock Water ~1 Purge eum. Temp. Spec. 2 pH '.ime ·oe~th Rate Volume Cond. be ow Purged MP :4 HR ft . ml/min liters •c µS/crn 11s; '1--/, 0'-f -i. . ./J. / ~QM A«·~ c:i 177 .f 5'C, t?,Do ~-&i~ -L,(J,/~f"" ,~d,, 0 I\ /77 16'. It Id II A.0 -c.. tJ ./ ~'I~ @1,/Y (75 L/.56 lJ \ '6 L/, (/3, -L.o.l ~~ ~~.st ]7<p Lf.1i 1~~5 1-/, (p ':> -l.O. r ~r N'\ )_?._.t,.{<t /11 5.15 I~ L(.~ 5 z.() ,{':)fv\f\ IJl.OO (7lr/ s,'-( I . . Pump dial setting (for example: hertzL cycles/min, etc) . . µSiemens per crn(same as µmhos/cm) at 2::> •c . . oxidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). OM/ DO Turb-Comments Eh idity mv mq/L NTU l )0 b ~-~(., )l?.1. ~/3,1 r. rt 5/.5 '3'i:{t.'7 3.3(,., 1-/1, 5 10),5 'J.?3 4~-9 59, l I. '"o I "1'6-'-f (JCo."l-. ).. . o'-f Lf /, ,5 - ~;,/\ -•Je,-lm l~ ~"\\~\~~"I .... -~ ~c) J <A f~{,,-: ['f t~ -- - - - -- - - n mum ~~~.;ements age_o __ Woll. NG ;:-:;:;:-· .n Wl\.TER mm'. FORM EXAMPLE (Mi i R i p ,ocation (Site/Facility Name) Dtil/\\ ~1>40 TlE ~;i-e,, Depth to ; of screen lell N\llllber-(. 0-'3 Date '-11(7/bi./\ (below MPk t~ bottom rield, Persoriiie+ if-:!~ i'raaf:1> ' Pump Inta eat ( • below MP! ,ampling Orgaru.z i n ;,,;: p1J Purging Device; (pump type) 312,~re.f :dentify MP I :lock Water ~1 Purge cum. Temp. Spec. 2 pH OM/ DO Turb-Comments '.ime De~th Rate Volume Cond. Eh idity be ow Purged MP :4 HR ft ml/min liters •c µS/cm mv mq/L NTlJ f t,[O 3 -----l 5PM ~jt;;/ Jj) -'12 I~ I o. Sc) 'f/4/ '1. 5/ 1i O -~ ('iD '6 ---1 J(lli 'B" f\'i I 2.o. 3'0 IJ ~ ,?lo /1~r. I is3 'ir. cJ Lf r 1 -:t (M (A ~It j [q_ y ~ l'.2.'~ 5.'ft bl(o, 1 <t, &; 7 AB°-3 - 11 n --~(J/V) /(, ,1t;;( 1',ZO, It ui S7~ &'iS ~ Cf '1¥' 7.& 1110 --~h\l\ ~o ~q_l J....0-IL/ I"\ s~ /g7'Ji .;:, <{,'f 5 I °'.s ,(li I~~~ --( ~f lA I),~ 'Y</ ,q.</6 ill :;,q~ l<"(S0 r, ~'5 -~ 7. 4'1 1111.i --I 5Pwi ir 5s_( fl5b ( J 11 ::i.53 (pyO.(p 8', 55 5. lo'1 • Pump dial setting (for example: hertz, cycles/min, etc) • • µSiemens per cm(same as µmhos/cm) at 2::, •c. · • oxidation reduction potential_ (stand in for Eh). - - - - - --1~ •1~ -~c-~...-, -w Page_l_ of_/_ ..ocation (JS ·.te/F;acility Name) ~c<V;,,. Pc<r\( Tc,E 'Si\-<-Depth to --.,""""'"-· -~=-of screen Jell Number_ 313. r'Pl:~ , Date_-j_../.:..IY'-'ltl.:..;J'--------(below MP) top bottom rield Perso el i\t:-1 Ad,-,ffi Pump Intake at (ft. below MP) ianq:iling Organizafi n wl':-f(oL\I · Purging Device; (pump type)=-:..:::=:::::::==::=:::::-:dentify MP . 5E!!E;;;;;;!j!ii!Eiiiii!5!a!i~i5EF=!ii!liiiiEj!i!!!!!i!iii!!!iii!lliliiiiii!l!iili!iijiE!!!!i!iEEliiiiiiiiiilli&l!illll--liiliiliii!jj :lock Water ~l Purge eum. Temp. Spec. pH . :ime De~th Rate Volume Cond. 2 be ow Purged MP :4 HR ft ml/min cm . \514 ---I ~WM I, t-/ r,, Yi 15~ ----\ ;:Jf l'VI /'1.Di' &.3~ 5 -\ '1. \ ('o. lJ l31 I ,.-l i.o "I 1i.0G, !1 '1 \ M ;z5 ~'ti 17.1~ ~y ~.O<o • Pulllp dial setting (for ex~le: hertz, cycles/min, etc) . . µSiemens per crn(same as µmhos/crn) at 2::, •c • . OXidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). O~/ DO Turb-Comments Eh idity mv L L{i0.1 i,, 077 '17 7. .. ... ,I\-~--·--i: rJ P ... r\ c ·. i S ( 0 --w .. 11 -~W:r Min mum R~~~ rements N 'e-" wn. 'l'li'.ll nrrn '. TY Mli'll ( . i i - - --rnRM age 0 p I f I -.ocation ()ite/F;tij~ity Name) l\r.v: !:, I uc.,o Tle. (.1 f-e---Depth to -I of screen lell Number .1<'00-D Dal.e 1-11,,:111 (below MP) • t~ bottom rield Personne,1. te.u, ,. •-_, "~":e. 11rcV\f<~ - Pump Intake at ( • below MP) iang:>ling Organizal.J.On \,,IE,.'\ -r-11 J.. I Purging Device; (pump type) ~¢i~lt~F ~ (fl..,,.,,ff,£«1e-:dentify MP :lock Water ~l Purge cum. Temp. Spec.2 pH ~irne De~th Rate Volume Cond. be ow Purged MP :4 HR ft ml/min liters •c µS/crn Ii YO ,---I fl<,\)Mil) s .:20. 3 '-/ IC.. 3 7.15 \4~S --I ~e M ~D 11,77 I'-/ I (,. {'i 145() ___,, -( :'I PM tS lq. o I . ['-(() 5,tj 11.f SS --\ ~P""! J...O \t 7'6' 1 'i I S,1<) (:>06 --\~FM 15 t'-,(, ~ 1 IL( I 5.7~ 156<---(. -:if/VI 10 \C{, l, l 141 5.l,5 ., PUJnp dial setting (for example: hertzt cycles/111J.n, etc). µSiemens per cm(same as µmhos/crn) at 2::, •c. oxidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). OMI DO Turb-Comments Eh idity mv mg/L NTU L/3?. '!, 5..<S s.,i s3,. 3 L./ 3). b5.Z~ '2 /.s,'1 S.4) ~O. 65 597. lo s. '-I'-/ , ~-J'-t C((. 3, Lf.'18' ~3.'.)r ~('6. 5 s. 4l. 1~3.1,l - - :lock Water ~1 Purge eum. Temp. Spec. pH ~ime De~th Rate Volume Cond. 2 be ow Purged MP ft ml/min liters L 6-1 0 fl'Vl -l{ -O.[ ~ffV\ __, '--0. ( fV\ -----\ ---(6 -,Sf'1A -l . ' l t..().I rfr'\ if I lf tf 11/ '1 A1, -.: 6. r ""1 -It "( 5,13 II~ a. ).1./<i' < O.l~Pl'I -I 5 S.~ <ti-/jf/.1\ I t.0 -)~ ff"' zo.l ~PM 19-0~ • Pump dial setting (for exan,ple: hertz, cycles/min, etc) • . µSiemens per cni(same as µmhos/cm) at 2:, . •c . • oxidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). --- - -- - - OM/ DO Turb-C0111Inents Eh idity mv ~~-~ 'rf -1 . . I 3 . 'tsf,d, -a .'f7 5 l> 'f'!O • G C,. J__ 1.S -l fcitli.1. t-tt q() o~r f.1. s<i,.6 {e...-· EXAMPLE (Minimum Requirements) W,. l l PTTRr.:ING-FIE1D WA'l'l<'>l , " ., . 1 TY Ml".ll~ FORM Page _j_ of _L_ ,ocation (Site/Facility Name) b"~ f{oc,_o TcG .:>i~ Depth to , of screen lell Number L""-:1. Da.,,.,te.,..w-,=2,-/Q..,,.?,---'-"-----(below MP) top bottom rield_Personne+ 1\ltly iH'L;YU Pump Intake at (ft. below MP)-----;ampling Orgaru.zation wt:i-1.f'.? p Purging Device; (pump type) s·,_,,fJ-._t,.,..,l(..,.ef..,....--- :dentify MP :lock '.ime Water Depth below MP Purge Rate eum. Volume Purged Temp. Spec. pH OR'P/ Cond. 2 Eh3 DO Turb-idity :4 HR ft ml/min liters •c us/cm mv mq/L NTlJ --s )5() -lO 08\\ -__, -17; oO l-..5 1D 17. 5 5 --17 S 0 • Pump dial setting (for ex~le: hertzL cycles/nun, etc)., • µSiemens per cm(same as µmhos/cm) at 2::, •c • • OXidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). C=ents vv----· lllltJ·ct,111 -~.01,<~~, l~5 -,.<Yk\ -,.,~~ u;\5,: .. ':) 1!'1 - - - Tc,'\c<. I tcf-1¼ =-1 lJ. · 5 5 l,.-,,(/ " l _J_ EXAMPLE (Minimum Re5l!:1_irements) Page_of _________ ,_Wmlilei,;1;;,11....,., • Nr "'"'·' WATER·,;-.oTY ~i:i;il !iilo.W..~FO'RMiliil... __________ _ ..ocation (Site~Facility Name) eit;, ·s l)lir) TC.E Sr'-1( Depth to q¼ I Jlfl,'3.S of screen lell Number {..W-::, Dace .., 11, -J. (below MP) cop oottom rield Perso, ... e.1. ·~, II , A au~.!. 5'4""'; £ ,. 1 Ov, Pump Intake at (ft• below MP) J iampling Organizac.l.uu v./t:~I IJIV Purging Device; (pump type) I ,,-r~~C, 61.,J er :dentify MP - :lock Water· ~1 Purge eum. Temp. Spec. pH OM/ DO Turb-Comments ~ime De~th Rate Volume Cond. 2 Eh idity be ow Purged MP :4 HR ft ml/min liters •c µS/cm mv mg/L NTtJ lltO \S.'i'1 -L6.ltrM -I~. 67 &9 177,.. '2>~)5 t.JL{ J...5.3 '1 \14~ 15,q·~ -<D,! ~PM -17~5 '11 &.CfS LfS~. I 't.o/ Ja,3S l[SD LS/10 -Z6.(~(rv\ 0_&,0 51 tS1 1q1. 3 '6.07 ~).~~ - (IS'":) k'.:) I ~ b -z6. lifW\ -tJ-3 S 54 0.~7 519. I 'fr. I 0 RJ.8'U JUo'{)~ 15.-= ~ 6, \ :\fl'\ -17, ~ ~ s '{ ~. i.S ~30.l'. o, 15 ~3, s / - /26~ \~. ·r, -L6.l5fr"I -17. 2.0 s~ h.O'i s1, . .1.. t.tJ</ ~~-~ () lalo !S.95 --zo . I 5f'rtl ___, 17. !S 51 to;;, 5~3.i '(.o~ 1)3. /tf • Pump dial setting (for example: hertz, cycles/llll.n, etc) • • µSiemens per cm(same as )l!Dhos/cm) at 2::, •c • • oxidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). ¥.l .. ,, .. v ~ - - 6..,,.d iur~r.,: \Od-5 w .. 11 .-i··-·--·-60tl,,r'l1 of 1,1el1 · 11.:i EXAMPLE Min mum Re ( ' 1 ING-FIET,n WATER ..ocation (S~Fe(~ cility ,~ame) ~~u:1 ~()40 TCE. Si:)€: lell Number LL, -MW·'f Date 41¾ i rield Persouue.1. I(<." II\, P.,Q4vu /v,,,; .. ··-rc,,,!lon lampling Organizai.ion '-'t:.~J]!::i,! · :dentify MP :lock Water ~l Purge CUm. Temp. Spec. ~ime De~th Rate Volume Cond. 2 be ow Purged MP :4 HR ft ml/min liters •c µS/crn O' 1110 ~&'-05 -(0. l ~f1A1 -fo.1S 90 0 1,5'() '6'5, I 7 -<D. \ '()/'lVl ---. 17 ~i ~t _j1_K'--/001 :rl). 15 -L().l t~vt\ -l~O~ l~ /00~ ~'8'-~ 6 -((). /'.'lfl'-I -i: /0 ~~ I0(5 .SlZ'-( -L-o .I 'i:\fivt -~ .o i}. ~7 {O~J, ~-JS -<-0. I 5f"" -ly 15 (_, 7 rements age 0 , TY .l'\I :... rnRM i Depth to li5 / J'f} of screen (below MP) ~ ottom Pump Intake at ( • below MP) Purging Device; (pump type) pH OM/ DO Turb-Comments Eh idity mv mg/L NTU <o.~1 /lq. i Y-5d-4~.4 lf. ;i I 1(i{, 9 3.5s 54-1 7. Cf "I 3-s Lf ·3.-a5 (, 1 '.3 1.<t7 ?,~t.f. f 3,5 0 S'f. 7 7'65 ~'155.~ s. al.f Sr. '1 C. 1.'l!:J 3,13-' ktt77 l0.3 • Pump dial setting (for example: hertzL cycles/llll.n, etc) • • µSiemens per c:m(same as µmhos/c:m) at 2::, •c. · · • OXidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). --- --~•I.,---••--••--f:;/\ u P~r~ e, : \I?..% EXAMPLE (Minimum Requirements Page_j_of_l_ W,.11 ~• N-,,-;:--,n Wll.'l'li'."R ,T:'r'l'V MJ:'.ll. _ _.FO~IRM~------------ ..ocation (~iJn/Fa ::i.lity Name) ~uvi~ ~DC. i) Tc:E ~,te-Depth to / of screen Jell Number d\'f>lla' Li (]) Date '-(ltj/_ (below MP) top -ioo=t"'tom=-___ _ ~ield Persouue.1. ~c 11t1c,•-1 _,~.,,.f '-lifcn .., Pump Intake at (ft. below MP) lanq:>ling Organiza .. :i:on 1.v, ,To"' Purging Device; (pump type)~========= :dentify MP lliiiiiii~!!Eiii!i!iii!!!!iii;iill!iii!ll55iiii!ii!;::aii!ili!!!!!!!a!!!;il=ii!!!ii!E!i5iiii!ii!;:=iiii!ii---i!i!Eiiii!iii!i=:!!55·--!iij!!-i!!!!Eip3!!!1iiii!i!ii!!j!iii!!iiiiii1iiiililiilliii!i~!i5=i!!iiEiiiiiiiiiiiiiil!iiillliliiii&i-llliiiiilii!iiiiii5ff :lock ~illle :4 HR HOO 1105 1110 Water Depth below MP ft - Purge Rate ml/min cum. Volume Purged liters Temp. Spec. 2 pH Cond. µSiem I l l I U't OM'/ Eh DO Turb-idity mv mg/L NTU l('JO l 7. 5 lfo, A() /0 7 ?Ji SOl.3 ~30 0. 0/ I( I Puillp dial setting (for example: hertz, cycles/llll.n, etc). µSiemens per cm(same as µmhos/cm) at 2::. •c. OXidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). Comments -----··-Ila:., ..... -~ ,k W<l ( -:. ss. L-/D ~ .. ,~-------&o t~•~ : oq5~ EXAMPLE (Minimum Re irements) w :lock ~ime :4 (ft 0 ---------------·---~ - Water ~l Purge De~th Rate be ow MP ml/min (. 0./ 6fM £.6./ t("" ~ {0,1 ~f/11 l 0, I ':)f ..,-i o.( ,(,,.._ t...0-I 1,.v> -----~----------------------- Cum. Temp. Spec. pH Volume Cond.2 Purged liters --< --&t ¥73 ll--:~i no Ii. I~-I[. L( /5, 11.l-(0 Pump dial setting (for ex~le: hertzt cycles/min, etc). µSiemens per cm(same as µmhos/cm) at 2:> •c. oxidation reduction potential (stand in for Eh). ON'/ Eh . L-1 ).I .';{ l( 7 }rt.~ __ , __ Page_l__of_l _ DO Turb-Comments idity L NTU 3'."1+ y,5 1-71- '--/,7 7 Oi 3. l.3lf ?,,~ 6'.6'7 Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \?, '-\ ?., '1 '3<4S l'o4'15".I n \3"\ () \":)60 13r;;).. !J 6L-\ Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC tJ\\1-l -0 \ 09/ Sil{ /2002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions, Inc. \J\x ~ Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) ~-q <0.1 nnm \1.S 'ii <0.1 aom i. 1 . ".) 'x <0.1 aom \1.?,'), <0.1 aom \lt.i1 <0.1 □om \ 1, .°13 <0.1 apm H.1. 0-,J <0.1 cmm It. -&'X <0.1 nnm <0.1 nnm <0.1 nnm <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom cit Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: · Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) 0\ 1;;1 7.3$ -\1.i.:, 3."\'3 l'l.ll.D1 ,.a~ -\ '6 .() '-{.Io\ 0. \11 f.\1 -d-'ii'.\ '--\ • '$:;2. 0.\2>3 (. ~ ~ -;;la."\ 3.S5 Cl.\ 1 \ 7.o'?:i --;} '·\. 0 Y 01 a , J:/6 1. o"J. --:;i.'-\ .o -~.is ('.). :l'-15 1.D'). -~'3. i..\ :,. 'Ii ls' Page_\ of~ Turbidity (NTU) .comments 1'5.uin '5, ,\~~osc. 1:2. '10 U '('~ <; 0111' + ·• (a. '6 . i...o \ \ l.i,1. ~(c (.p~-'iiq u.'3 '2)$ ~\. 3'-:t _: .. _ --· - - Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \\'-\5 \'\"l1 i\--\D\ \150 \l"1"'> \\S'{ '\\t;:.,1 Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site,. Gastonia, NC W,,.,i -0,;l ' 09/ a.'5" 12002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions, Inc. t-,\ \ Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) ,. \ <0.1 !Wm \1. \o <0.1 aom \\t .1\ <0.1 aom \\.t ./..o.O <0.1 aom \CJ. '5C:, <0.1 aom \\-Sic <0.1 com \ \.. S'-1 <0.1 nom \~.05 <0.1 nnm <0.1 aom <0.1 aom I <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom cit Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) M .'i, I I;}. . I I , ... ~' \ C, .-:,, cl ~ .l~\\ 'G· \'-\ 1'1.\ .7 ~-1.fJ. D .l -(0'1 \d.. \.lA 11 . .) l.j. OS ti.LAf\ \';). \1 -u ''S o.½'i 0.4-Z'-I \,l, . '"' ~'o-'\ -~.,'-\ o. \oa<\ \'.;:i. \() (.1.'\ ·:>-~\ ti .'5<\3 ~-1.7 1.41."' -:; .-~s Pagel. of _L Turbidity (NTU) Comments ol.<J .'-i o} \!-\. '\~ yJ ,,0\ \. ~-l\1 l:L .... I \\."51 \ \. ~ ( - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. -· Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \5Jo \ :5 dS' \ \ ';)::l~ 0 V5?-r, \60>-\ \'531 Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC M';\) -Q;, 09I §I.( 12002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions. Inc. M. \ u/1.. <1..., Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) fil. \ <0.1 apm n. s~ <0.1 nnm 11. J'\ <0.1 nnm \1. O':) <0.1 nnm ,.,.., .o "\ ' <0.1 aom \ 1.05 I <0.1 aom 11. uS <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 qpm <0.1 □om I <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom of Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH 0 If/Eh (mv) (mg/L) C .\Sl l.t .1-;;). g ~ .·1 -;i_ x, 0-i'Sl {§ . '{ do-I.a'{ .o 3.&'i ().\/,\ 1~ . ?-io 1'-l ,0 t> .1'-\ O\~S (J,'l°\ 10.'°;:;). 3.'Sl o. :i3n ~ .;;/~ 10. la 3 . .;i5 O.ISlo l,.~q Co'\,\ .? . "\ '? Page_j_ of _L Turbidity (NTU) Comments lat\'{,"). ,-J~U. "~~ 10'-/ .J. -(\/._ s +vi . \.) ·101, \ u i,9:l. ~ ia1"\.3 l((a0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. -- Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time '\ C) ?:,C... \O~~ \D L-1 d- \o'-1. '°' \OL-\7 Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC t--1\'N JO'-\ oe1 a-1 12002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions. Inc. Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) 40, I <0.1 oom '°'·V..15 . <0.1 aom \ 1. l°} <0.1 aom \l, C\v\ <0.1 aom \Li.-iS <0.1 aom \\.e.'8l· <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom cif Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) 0. \\ Cl '6-\~ ~~ '6 .?, Li.. 14 ~ O.\U."{ '6.').~ ··<S'-\ 'lo ,;:i ' \ '\ ('.) .\'·\\o ~. \In -\\S.7-\. "\ (., 0 .\'-l" "{ '\ (. ·\00.3 c)., so O.\C\\ 'is'\ \p -\d.'{. l ;,i .l, "\ Page_i_ of _l_ Turbidity (NTU) Comments t' C\noJV <"-'-\C'-,0, .a C!.Jk,,_,.__, ~-( +-7 ' ,0 OOJ\.J "\\.x' \0\ 1..\ ------------------- Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \ln 8'-\ \ l. a7 'to :)fl-, \\o~"\ lln::i\ ' Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC N\'}) ~iJS - 09/ :.l 3 /2002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions. Inc. N\1'\ Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) N\1\: <0.1 aom Y1 -1 cf <N\~ <0.1 aom \l. ln I'> \'A <0.1 aom 11 q_'? N\>A. <0.1 aom \1.°I .... I\)\ v.. <0.1 aom \7.%'i( <0.1 aom <0.1 qpm <0.1 aom <0.1 nnm <0.1 nnm <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom of Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) Q.;..,s3 (o. \"\ \loC\ -~ 7. \\ - Q_d-S7' k. \. S \~'{' C\ -i.oc; 0,;;i.1.0 \o.\&\ \ \,-;)_' '-\. 1. ;;is I:) ~11, I Li. .\ q \1. \ . ') 7-d-.~ 0 -o-14.~ L, -Id-\ \t_ 0 . -;;,. t.,, -LL\ . Pagel of l Turbidity (NTU) Comments ~ ,", _\_,. ,; . (\. , ""-"'.I,.= ";:l-- ;(),(>Al ~ . ......, _,,.,.l ~ ff\,.,-,,.,_ I \. ~ ....... ~O \: .............. r _ ~ Q es;>A.J ~(:),{\,_ (h"'-• l ' "'(\_ .... i¾ ....... ' '-.I - - ---- --- - - - - - - - - - -. -· Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \'-\ JS I i{t:Q \'{ '3 \ ''{ '3, '.1, l'·l ?lt.l Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC f\l\~-O(o 09I };, /2002 . Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions, Inc. Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) l\l \ "'-<0.1 nnm ,~~~ <0.1 aom· '"'. \ i <0.1 nnm \7 -i-i <0.1 nnm 11 .\a;l <0.1 com 11-."I\ <0.1 com <0.1 com <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom of Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) O·lSta ; . '-11 \J<; . (,., "6-c,0 -' o:. \-S~ \..,. I.. 1 \~'-\. ~ ,.0\..\ o. \S;;i. i.,. '-l3 \':)\,. \ ·1.yq O.\~\ <,.;;).S \'"\a-~ 1.%1 0.\'50 lo .~S \'io 7 7.1C\ Page_iof l_ Turbidity (NTU) Comments 1-~~ \d, . ~'-\ I-\. lD (Q_.1 & ,l). s ------------------- Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \~ ""!, 3 I :l:, '-\ \d-.~ \-;).z, ~ \;;!.:':) & Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC M,\.)J -Cl"t- 09/ :l.3 /2002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions, Inc. Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) IJ \ 'v\-<0.1 nnm \'& -~S <0.1 nnm \%.t,c <0.1 nnm \7. '\ l <0.1 nnm C7-~1 <0.1 nnm l7.0() <0.1 nnm <0.1 acm <0.1 Qpm <0.1 qpm <0.1 anm <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom of Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) 0 -:l-ol, Lt . '{ t, \:l.~ .'1 '6--7....3, (:). \°'-5 <.. -2..\ \"!>'-'.-l '(;" . \ I.,, 0. \'\3 <.. .\~ \~'\ .s '6-'-\.I C -\ 't3 l,,.\"3 \ '-I.() . l 'is. '-i <\ <:) .\q::, l. . \\ \'-\.L·I.D ~ -O"\ - Page..l_ of ..L Turbidity (NTU) Comments . ~. A ' 'v-A b\ A. •~•A IU,,"t° .....,.,/": ..... ~ '5~ '1~~ ,. <;i - { '1.!;.? ~~()----{ s -· r' r~ ol'\.. wd-.Q..I\.. ------------------- Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \~.'.)."il; \ 5 "3-::l.. \':>;:,1 \:St.{1 , \ 5'-1. S . Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE.Site, Gastonia, NC ~\JJ-08 09/ ;,). ~ /2002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions, Inc. ,-.>\'A- Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) \-l\A <0.1 nnm \1 . 2Slt, <0.1 nnm \1 . I'-\ <0.1 nnm ~1.?-s 'S <0.1 nnm \1. '),<.-\ <0.1 nnm r-1 .,:}";:). <0.1 qpm <0.1 nnm <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom ' <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom of Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) 0.\"6S Lo..Z\ \I.;,-;}. 7 "\.;;;i.°I i!).111 !.,_.$5? \S4. :;;i. "'1.5~ 0.,11 ti .lQ. l I S1. l G\ .oa G. \ l°I I,-~'::, \'53".ri °'-o"l ~-17°'1 l,.{Q\ i lLa. L\ 1,,-~7 . Pagel of .l_ Turbidity (NTU) Comments \-:l.. ;;)._;_;i_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --· - Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \'-\S '-\ \Y.."S~ \'-lS~ l S'O I \Sti '-\ \~ t:>1 Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC M.ltJ -O°t 09/ ~-12002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions, Inc. w\~ Depth to Water (fl.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) Isl, ....... <0.1 aom \"1. %~ <0.1 nom \7.13 <0.1 nom \7-~5 <0.1 aom \l•lR'\ <0.1 anm \'1.S'3 I <0.1 nnm \1. \~ <0.1 oom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 oom <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom cit Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: · Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) O·;;).?,"I l,.'1L, 1'{0,\ ~-,2. 0·;;). lQO L ,3'-\ 1">1,'2.. 'x .00 0,:l.'5o lt-35 15"'\ ,°I 1. fa3 O· i>10 I.. 't 2.. \51. -~ 't:-\'b 0-~~"6' l.a. YS 16\. 3 't<;. \ \ D,;;l.oi ~-7>~ \ <; ''i,' _q 1. 'is'f . Page..L of J_ Turbidity (NTU) Comments \t,, 35 l \. Y'-1 tz.. "2.3 \L l, [ 0 . '\. l,:, \'1...t;/ -- - - - - - - - - --- - - - --· -· Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: · Company: Purging Device: Time O"l'.J \ I'"\ °' ::i -:,.. o°-d. l,, " e,,'"' "'\ 0 c, d--x' Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC N'W-\C) 09/ @:l 12002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions. Inc. !-\,ILJ\o :e.,, Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) 'N\~ <0.1 apm '~-1~ ~ \ 1l,-<0.1 aom \t.¢.<t.~ 1-,.;\~ <0.1 aom \t, :1 L.\ ·Isl\ IQ. <0.1 aom \~.i..t\ 't,.l\l'l. <0.1 aom \ \,_ . c, -;i <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 a □m <0.1 nnm <0.1 nnm . <0.1 gpm . Depth to Bottom cit Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) 0.;)'-Ho ti Al\ [I ,1. \ 1-143 0 .;:i 'i '-\ [( -1 d,. l~S-1 /.(..1 1"\ , "I '1 '1 ~-1? \lLci, ~ '5 Do 0-.}4\. l,_. li\ \tt.;:l. 3 '1.14. 0 ,;3-1...id-~-~S \l.~.a 1 .C\_ S Pagel of -1.. Turbidity (NTU) Comments ~a.,,., 0 o. Cvv 11' /10 A 'Q =•I "n",.' , ---------------~--- Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time 07'-11 01'1. l( () 1 '-1."\ E:o1'SO 015l Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC !'I\ \N -.:\'.('.[ \ \ 09/ .;14 /2002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions, Inc. t-.; \l'lr Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) ~ \IO.-<0.1 Qpm rl -'-1.'1 ,I_\\\\. <0.1 aom \'1.07 \J \ Ill,, <0.1 aom \I,. i'\ \J \ \\-<0.1 aom \\t.'isl 'I-,)\ 'I+ <0.1 aom \Lt -"i>la <0.1 anm <0.1 anm <0.1 aom <0.1 anm <0.1 nnm <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom cit Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) <,. ~~ '%.W l~'{ .I.A. "'I.'-{ 1 e.l'\"\ lt .1\0 \l!L-0 °'· :r~ n. \C\ )2 l,..SS '\.t..\ .7 C\. . \ C\ O,\"\'y ~ 4'4, \lt!-:2. 0 '\. ~;) C.\.<\'v (.,.3'x I.~:) . \ C\. ol.(o . Page~of ...l Turbidity (NTU) Comments ~ 111 n 1,.,-_ ,I.;_ me:kiv ; Q, o,\., \,, A ~ k.v,-.. > UQu.,v \.I~~~ ~On n h I ',-<-~•d,-av1. n.¾ ' {( 0 _.,,... h. I 11,\(L..\:-..l..}\.. -n., .... o ....... •-k'-A •. ' " Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \l., 5 \ \(ii<;~ \l,<oC, \~51 'lo sci. \~ ()O C7o3 - - - - - - - - - - -----Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC N\'1--l•\a oet JS 12002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions. Inc. t-\ -Q_, Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) d,\.'--\ <0.1 nnm \1,C:, 7 <0,1 nnm \1-3'5 <0,1 nnm 11. \~ <0.1 nnm \4.\~ <0.1 nnm \1.o~ <0,1 nnm Cl. OIA <0.1 nnm \1 . I!) I <0,1 nnm <0.1 nnm <0,1 nnm <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom of Well: i\\. 8'. Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) t). \d--;;i. 7 .ol_o ,~...,-~ 7-'liS o.\S3 l,. .'-{ ~ \'{ 1 i -r; °' :i l),\ILD ~ .'J.--\ \cS. L\ 1-l 'S O.\\\o ~.\1 \'{d.. --I y :~?:, 0. \\ \o le. 0 'iS \ '$;) , lo 1 .'& t,, 0.\\1., l,.c:i \"::,3 ,8 1."\ O 0 . \;}._ "S lD .o'-\ \ <;; :> . --\ ~.al Page_l_ of Jc. Turbidity (NTU) Comments \~"1 ,1 wod-..,,.__ \;}.C\_,'-1 sJl,< " \,Jc\~ o~la-1 'C\Jv~ ~ \<{;;t. CL V ,is.:2 \~O. I \'-\.i., Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \O"\ \ Lb'-t5 \t, '-C1 ((j 4" to c, l Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC N\\l',\-\°3 . 09/ '}.G, /2002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions. Inc. }\. n:, Depth to Water (ft.) ·Purge Rate Temp.(C) t,. I <0.1 qpm I It-~ l \ <0.1 aom !(p,~y <0.1 aom \lo.lo\ <0.1 nnm HeJii1 <0.1 nnm ,~ .C:.i . <0.1 nnm <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom of Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) G. I <;;l.1 i.~'i )2, -~ 8-a, O,ll;){o ,. Yl -1°1_.5 d -i1-<.o 1'1 ,') \ 0 l ,<., -a-,'-{_ I ';2,lnO b ,'ol;;l,~ 7.'1.::: -~-1,~ d...tC:", (\.isc:, 1. bL. -IY.O 1,(t' I Pagel__ of l_ Turbidity (NTU) Comments 1.Lf 7-0't (g. i.a (o lf.'{;:) ·"1. \~ ------------------- Well ID: ! Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time l'i'g.,L-l I 'S ;:l (.p 1<5 J 9 1'5"30 1'53';}.. \':531 \S~S Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC f'I\\N - \ l\ . oe1 cvs 12002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions. Inc. ,!--\.\ ~\.'cl "'--- Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) 5 3. c:, <0.1 aom 11. v't <0.1 nnm \"1.o'-j <0.1 aom \ltq'-{ <0.1 nnm \{,.'\\ <0.1 nnm \\.i-~°I <0.1 aom 1~-'\o <0.1 aom \l,.'\O <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 nnm <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom cit Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) O-l't;J. (o:53 l\'-l.t.t "3 .(o"J o. \1 ~ (., \1 U1-~ . ~-1.3 ~-1.'80 ~-\':> \\'-\.-\ '3-'\1 ('.).\7~ la.\'-\ \\l,. % ·:,.';j1 ('.).\1-i (ii.\.\ \\~-'l< ~. "i< 'i( 0-~1'--l vi-~ a l dd, .L\ 3.5c D -\19. In .o "9 \~:, .°\ '3 .l\li Page.l.. of l__ Turbidity (NTU) Comments '5'11-3 '.1' -l.,.i I 1,,_,. '-'!11 .S ,,.-,,~\.. .. '-' '107>-d. u 'b t1 .'\ 2, ~ '6 ,<::. 3'5\,3 -~\'\.'-\ -.... ---~·------------------- Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \ '-\ () \,, \.'-\()'ii"' \--\ \.\ \Y.\.3 \ '-\. \ '-\ \4.\<:: Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC M'N· \'5. 09/ 24;, /2002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions. Inc. }-A_ \(W Depth to Water (fl.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) ·\\.~Y-<0.1 rmm \'c. \ q , <0.1 ,mm \4.1'\ <0.1 nnm \1. l tt <0.1 nnm \I. 1/\ <0.1 nnm \1. (t \ <0.1 nnm \"1. L,IA <0.1 nnm <0.1 nnm <0.1 nnm <0.1 cmm <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom of Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) 0,~~ Lt.~1 <R-d 1. :).(.p_ 0 .i\.\ \i. ~\ <\\.-~ \.,.°I.~ 0. ~"3~ . -;).. \ lL. "\:, .0 . l\ ?, u. o:;;na ti-\ 7 C..~.3 1 ,;;}c 0.")..\0 u-~O "t 'k" '~ ·7. ;;i..g l'.).;1.\C) l.t-~7 <l.S.'-\ "1-17 .• Page~of _l_ Turbidity (NTU) Comments I .I , , 11 ·";>J"\ D . \ \ 9::3, lu..f\.'olt, -,,.l-.<¾, qs~-1 -< ~ \ " r-.0 I{ ~q. 7 A. ,l-oL-<7~ ... .,,., '-t~I -g .. ~ .-Pr, _Q , ·".9 <:. ., 0 • <;<.\ . .o i.'-lO~ J ~,.\ ,._ ~\.JI-· '{ IJ.. ~ °t'A.. '. Ov-;l,_ - u u --~~------------------- Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time ll'-{?- ll '1~ (r (..j s (1.Y~ \1'11 Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC N\'N -\(.g . 091 ;:i "' 12002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions, Inc. }A\ Depth to Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) 1\)\1\ <0.1 aom \1,g, In <0.1 aom i 1. \ \ <0.1 aom n -.J?- <0.1 !Wm t1 -.;i.~ <0.1 aom {1 .l'i? <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom cif Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) O;ll'-! (.; "-I 7... JoS? '-(. 1 ~ O.J.1 ·~ v. ()0 i(5.'1 '-{ . 'r'-f (\.~l'3 s."5 w-1-J. 5-61 Cl.'1\d-<;. 5 i \\ 1. '1 S.°lo O.:Ji'i '5. 4-2, 11-i. • ~ ~-10 . Pagel of _l_ Turbidity (NTU) Comments D . "13 ;;r~.J-0 J\.(l) lq ,?i5 t't .. 0'1 - - - - ------- - - - - - -·-- Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \\:i.<x-' \ \ ';)O \l ?,\ \13'3 \\~':;, Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC N\ \J\j -\"'!- . 091 oH 12002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions, Inc. -"-1\, Depth to Water {ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) Nit'... <0.1 nnm \t.i .ll! s <0.1 nnm \':>."\3 <0.1 nnm \'o. ~ L,, <0.1 □om \'5. '\2 <0.1 nnm \SA!> <0.1 aom . <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 aom <0.1 gpm Depth to Bottom of Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. DO (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) b. 1°'-'-'l 1. -j 7, \$:).7, '3.0°1 0. \.'b"Y "1 :J...I:, \ 'SID ."\ 1 °lo t'l. \ i~ (i . \l., lvo-<o 7. ':> ::2 O.\ 'ilS i •. \ \ \ \i ;;i • "!) 1."6d b. \'%$ l, . 0 "'\ \l,-1.0 ll'l .al Page_.\.,_ of l_ Turbidity (NTU) Comments \'. -~ 7 \. ;;) ;;). ~.(Y1 ~-°'~ 5.SL.o . -------------------_,,;,,-' Well ID: Date: Field Peronnel: Company: Purging Device: Time \'.:lr \3 12. \'A'. \ 3 l <: ~ l 3! (, \~ 13{7 \a l~l °I . I i;i, 1 Well Puring -Field Water Quality Measurements Form Davis Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC N\'t,j -\'i\. 091 ·as 12002 Kris Spikes/Jamie Brenton Weston Solutions. Inc. Q.... Depth to Depth to Bottom cit Well: Stick-up Height: Sample ID: Sample Time: Sampler: Spec. Cond. N0.:i-\'l) J"',w \'i?~ ~¢\2>4-3~¢ 13Ur, DO Turbidity Page__l of _j_ Water (ft.) Purge Rate Temp.(C) (µs/cm) pH ORP/Eh (mv) (mg/L) (NTU) Comments N \ 'll. <0.1 qpm 11. 'dl. l1. Ja7 l·lO 110.0 <./. 8'1:; .\~'/\'./ <0.1 qpm \1 .\0 0. l S;;l ti. 1 I \la-I .0 ? . i.P1 \ '-{-I • 41 <0.1 qpm n.03 0-IS .;i. (,.-1.'i li2,;i.1$ S. '-i9 l'-lct .5 <0.1 qpm 1.1.0--i ('.) .;).~0 le-~--, 1 s S-~ -.;i.s ':, -\1,'\.'3 <0.1 a□m l1. o3 o.~c; '7. I')? i'$'\.5 -5 .11 l-<o -.., <0.1 a□m \1.o5 O.;)d."{ (Q • l ;i, 1-s,. ;;t ,s. o3 \'(3. I <0.1 a□m <0.1 a □m <0.1 nnm <0.1 nnm <0.1 gpm - ;)_. ' .. .1:_::·-:: r::~~t- .. ~ , -···, . ~- : : - ·• 'r • .. ,.' . ;_ -'., .... 99P-01s7., ., '<.'''. t .. .-• . ,.. .. ' • ,,. . ~., .. : ..... ·t'· -~. ·,.., ,' -:.,. ·,_.,f ,-:,~ . . . (,:'. r. ~~ . ·: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIXB LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS K:\20064\138\Quarterly\secondquarterreport2.doc I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 4 MEMORANDUM Date: 05/14/2002 Science and Ecosystem Support Division 980 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30605-2720 Subject: Results of VOLATILES Sample Analysis 02-0536 Davis Park Rd Gastonia, NC From: Mcconney, John 'Qlu--==-- To: Vorsatz, Philip CC: Ralph McKeen RACS/W Thru: QA Office Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have any questions, please contact me. ATTACHMENT I I I Case Number: I Site ID. Date: I Affected Sam2les I VOA 4189-4212 I I 4 I 89,4191-4194, 4201-4207 4190,4196 I 4190,4196,4209 I 4190,4196 14191. 14192 4194 14195,4197-4200 I 4196 14197 14202 4202 I I I 30384 ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT Project Number Davis Park Road, Gastonia, NC 5/9/02 Com2ound or Fraction methyl acetate methyl cyclohexane all compounds except methyl acetate dichlorodifluoromethane, cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane trichloroethene, toluene, tetrachloroethene, ethylbenzene, xylene(total), styrene, isopropylbenzene chloroform, I, 1, I -trichloroethane chloroform, I, I, I -trichloroethane, I, 1,2- trichloroethane chloroform dichlorodifluoromethane, vinyl chloride, trichlorofluoromethane, I, 1,2-trichloro-1,2,2- trifluoroethane, cyclohexane, carbon tetrachloride, methylcyclohexane toluene I, I, I-trichloroethane methylcyclohexane, toluene trans-1,2-dichloroethene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene 02-0536 Flag Used R J J J J J J J J J J J J SAS Number NIA Reason erratic initial & continuing calibration relative response factors erratic continuing calibration response factors exceeded holding times erratic continuing calibration response factor low deuterated monitoring compound recovery < quantitation limit < quantitation limit < quantitation limit erratic continuing calibration response factor < quantitation limit < quantitation limit < quantitation limit low deuterated monitoring compound recovery I I I I I I I Case Number: Site ID. Date: Affected SamJlles 4208,4210-4212 14209 4210 14212 IN/A PEST IN/A I I I I I I I 30384 ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT Project Number Davis Park Road, Gastonia, NC 5/9/02 ComJlound or Fraction 02-0536 Flag Used dichlorodifluoromethane, trichlorofluoromethane, J I, l ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, cyclohexane, carbon tetrachloride, methylcyclohexane, 1,2-dibromo-3- chloropropane cis-I ,3-dichloropropene, trans-I ,3-J dichloropropene, 1, 1,2-trichloroethane trichloroethene J trans-1,2-dichloroethene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene, J dibromochloromethane, 1,2-dibromoethane, bromoform SAS Number NIA Reason erratic continuing calibration response factor low deuterated monitoring compound recovery < quantitation limit low deuterated monitoring compound recovery ------)LATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS ------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4189 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program,_ SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: CO2TB / Media:TRIP BLANK-WATER D No: 18P6 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50UR 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE · METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE )LDING TIMES EXCEEDED(40 CFR 136,OCTOBER 26,1984) RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U iverage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/16/2002 07:50 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1ctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. ~c indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --- ---------'OLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS ------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4189 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program; SF Id/Station: CO2TB / Media:TRIP BLANK -WATER ANALYTE Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18P6 RESULTS 0,52J 0.50U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UNKNOWN COMPOUND BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED ROMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interterences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/16/2002 07:50 Ending: -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-malerial was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - - ---------"EPA ~GION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4190 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN F acilily: Davis Park Rd Program:. SF ld/Slation: CO2 / Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18P7 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS UNITS 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 5.0UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UR UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 5.0UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 5.0UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 5.0UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE OLDING TIMES EXCEEDED(40 CFR 136,0CTOBER 26,1984) RESULTS 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50UJ Produced by: McConney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/16/2002 09:40 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 --Sample 4190 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program;_ SF Id/Station: CO2 / Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18P7 RESULTS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ROMOCHLOROMETHANE AND 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES •average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/16/2002 09:40 Ending: •actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation Hmit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - ----------i:,pA • REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4191 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program, SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: MW20 I Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18P8 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50UR UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.44J UG/L 0.48J UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 3.0 UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 2.5 UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Produced by: McConney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 10: 15 Ending: RESULTS UNITS 0.S0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE •average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. •actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - - - - - OLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS --------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4191 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility.: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW20 / Media: GROUNDWATER RESULTS ANALYTE Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18P8 3.BJN 0.60J a.sou a.sou UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L SILANE, FLUOROTRIMETHYL UNKNOWN COMPOUND BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ROMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3 TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES. ATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 10:1S Ending: -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resa~pling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - ----------icPA ~GION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4192 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Gastonia, NC Program; SF Case No: 30384 Id/Station: MW2DD / Media:GROUNDWATER D No: 18P9 Org Contractor: A4 RES UL TS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50UR UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.43J UG/L 0.43J UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 2.9 UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.22J UG/L 2.2 UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 10:25 Ending: RESULTS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENE$ STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessaiy for verification. Page 1 of 1 --------~PA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4192 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program; SF Id/Station: MW2DD I Media: GROUNDWATER RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18P9 0.63J UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L UNKNOWN COMPOUND BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED ROMOCHLOROMETHANE AND 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 10:25 Ending: •average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interterences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. •actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. ,qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 ---- - -- -- - - - 'OLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS ------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 __ Sample 4193 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility_: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: MW2DFB / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1800 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou S.0U a.sou 0.S0UR a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou 0.S0U S.0U a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou 0.S0U a.sou a.sou O.S0UJ a.sou a.sou a.sou S.0U a.sou 0.S0U a.sou a.sou S.0U a.sou UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE . METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 08:10 Ending: RESULTS UNITS a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.S0U UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou uG/L 0.S0U UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.S0U UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - ---- -- --------EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 .sample 4193 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program; SF Id/Station: MW2DFB / Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 1800 RESULTS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3 TRICHLOROBENZENE Org co.ntractor: A4 ROCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSA TZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 08:10 Ending: -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. .qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - -Sample 4194 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: 2816DPRD / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18Q1 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou 5.0U a.sou 0.S0UR a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou S.0U 0.31J 0.65 a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou 12 0.S0UJ a.sou a.sou a.sou S.0U a.sou a.sou a.sou 5.7 5.0U a.sou UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project· Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 11 :30 Ending: RESULTS UNITS a.sou UGtL a.sou UG/L a.sou UGtL a.sou UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou uGtL a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou UGtL a.sou uGtL a.sou UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. -actual value is known tO be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 --- - -- --- - - - 'OLA TILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS ----·--EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample. 4194 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program; SF Id/Station: 2816DPRD / Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 1801 RESULTS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROEMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ROMOCHLOROMETHANE AND 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interterences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 11 :30 Ending: -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --------. EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA - - - ---Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4195 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility_: Davis Park Rd Program; SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: MW1 D / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1802 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS O.S0UJ a.sou 0.S0UJ a.sou a.sou 0.S0UJ a.sou 0.S0UJ S.0U a.sou 0.SOUR a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou S.0U a.sou a.sou 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U a.sou 0.50UJ a.sou a.sou a.sou 5.0U a.sou 0.50U 0.50U a.sou 5.0U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L. UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U a.sou 0.S0U 0.S0U a.sou 0.50U D.50U a.sou 0.50U 0.50U 0.S0U Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/16/2002 12:40 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --------.EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4195 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility_: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW1 D I Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 1802 RESULTS UNITS a.sou uGtL a.sou UG/L 1.6J UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS Org Contractor: A4 .~OMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANALYTES /\TA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED average value: NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/16/2002 12:40 Ending: actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysi~ is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --Sample 4196 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility_: Davis Park Rd Program;_ SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: CW6 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1803 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS UNITS 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 5.0UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UR UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 5.0UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 5.0UJ UG/L 0.17J UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 5.0UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2• TRICHLOR0· 1,2,2• TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS•1,2·DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE} 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-.1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE} METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE} METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ·OLDING TIMES EXCEEDED(40 CFR 136,0CTOBER 26,1984) -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/16/2002 16:45 Ending: RESULTS UNITS 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE . 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. .qc indicates that data unusabl8. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --... - - - - - ---ioPA -REGION IVSESD, ATHENS, GA -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4196 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program~ SF Id/Station: CW6 / Media: GROUNDWATER ANALYTE Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 1803 RESULTS 1.6J a.sou a.sou UNITS UG/L UGIL UG/L 2 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS BROMOCHLOROMETHANE _ 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED ROMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES •average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/16/2002 16:45 Ending: •actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 -. Sample 4197 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Programs SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: CW5 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1804 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50UJ 5.0U 0.50U 0.50UR 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.38J 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 3.0 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 1.6 5.0U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/18/2002 12:15 Ending: UNITS_ UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 ----'OLATILES SAMPLE\~N).LYSIS :'>ample 4197 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Gastonia, NC - - - - - EPA -REGION IV-SESD, ATHENS, GA Facility; Davis Park Rd Prograni,-SF Id/Station: CW5 / Case No: 30384 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1804 RESULTS 1.3J 0.50U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE UNKNOWN COMPOUND BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 HA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED WMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES .. .. -· ----Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/18/2002 12:15 Ending: average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --Sample 4198 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program~ SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: CW1 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1805 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS UNITS 0.50UJ UG/L a.sou uGtL 0.SOUJ UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou uGtL O.SOUJ UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.SOUJ UG/L S.OU UG/L a.sou uGtL 0.50UR UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou UG/L S.OU UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.S0UJ UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.S0UJ UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UGtL a.sou UGtL S.OU UG/L a.sou UGtL a.sou UG/L a.sou UGtL a.sou UG/L S.OU UG/L a.sou UGtL ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated va.lue. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 08:SS Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and rean.ilysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - ---OLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS --_Sample 4198 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Gastonia, NC ------EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Facility: Davis Park Rd Programs SF Id/Station: CW1 / Case No: 30384 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1805 RESULTS UNITS 0.82J UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou UG/L ANALYTE UNKNOWN COMPOUND BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 HA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED WMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J--estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. -----... Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 08:55 Ending: actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. · Page 1 of 1 - _,,... - -'OLATILES SAMPLE Al'fAL YSIS-- --.. ----------.. - - - -EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4199 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: MW3D / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1806 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS UNITS 0.50UJ UG/L a.sou UGtL 0.50UJ UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou uGtL O.SOUJ UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 5.0U UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.50UR UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou UGtL 12 UG/L a.sou UGtL a.sou UG/L S.OU UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou UG/L a.sou uGtL O.SOUJ UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UGtL a.sou UGtL S.OU UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L 5.0U UG/L a.sou uGtL ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 11 :50 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. .qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 -· --·---·-··-~EPA-REGION 1\/SESD, ATHENS, GA _, ____ _ Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4199 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Gastonia, NC Program~ SF Case No: 30384 Id/Station: MW3D / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1806 RESULTS 1.4J 0.S0U o.sou UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 2 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 \TA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED WMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: McConney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 11 :50 Ending: actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - _______ ,_ -~PA ::-RE:GION NSESD, ATHENS, GA -------·--Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4200 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program~ SF Id/Station: MW3DRB / Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK D No: 1807 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS O.SOUJ o.sou 0.SOUJ o.sou o.sou 0.SOUJ 0.SOU O.SOUJ 5.0U o.sou 0.SOUR 0.SOU o.sou 0.SOU o.sou 0.SOU 5.0U o.sou o.sou 0.SOUJ 0.SOUJ o.sou o.sou o.sou 0.SOUJ o.sou O.SOU o.sou 5.0U o.sou o.sou o.sou 0.50U 5.0U o.sou UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS 0.SOU 0.SOU o.sou 0.S0U 0.50U O.S0U O.SOU o.sou 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U Produced by: McConney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 10:00 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE :.1verage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. 3,ctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 _, ____ ._ ~A-REGION'IVSESD, ATHENS, GA _,_~---Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4200 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program:, SF Id/Station: MW3DRB / Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK ANALYTE Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 1807 RESULTS 0.65J 0.50U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ,TA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED iOMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES 1verage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSA TZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 10:00 Ending: 1ctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. lC indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --Sample 4201 FY 2002 Project: 02--0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program:_ SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: CO3 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18Q8 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 11 0.50U 0.50UR 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (fRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (fETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U ,..-,---~--Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 14:35 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L- UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1verage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. 1ctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. ◄C indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanatysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - ---'ali ::lLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS ---· -----· -EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA _( __ , ____ _ Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 _Sample 4201 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program~ SF Id/Station: CO3 / Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 1808 RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.59J UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE UNKNOWN COMPOUND Org Contractor: A4 \TA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED !OMOCHLOROMETHANE AND 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES 1verage value. NA•not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 14:35 Ending: Jctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. =tc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - - --1--•----EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA _,,.---~--Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4202 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: MW4D I Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1809 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50UR 0.50U 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 0.50UJ 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.48J 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.18J 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 0411812002 10:30 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 -: --· -- - -·-1\ EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA -.i --- - -Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4202 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program; SF Id/Station: MW4D I Media: GROUNDWATER ANALYTE Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 1809 RESULTS 1.6J O.SOU o.sou UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UNKNOWN COMPOUND BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 WMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES HA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-eslimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/18/2002 10:30 Ending: actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - - - --OLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS - -- - - - - EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA -- - --- -Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4203 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: FORT IN/ Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18R0 Org Contractor: A4 RES UL TS UNITS 0.S0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 12 UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50UR UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 1.6 UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.18J UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 1.5 UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (fRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (fETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U o.sou 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U o.sou 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:00 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - -------EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 _Sample 4203 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program~ SF Id/Station: FORT IN/ Media: GROUNDWATER RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18R0 0.91J UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L UNKNOWN COMPOUND BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ~TA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED ,OMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive eviderice of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:00 Ending: actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reani!tysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - - - - - - )LATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS -------EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 .Sample 4204 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Programs SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: FORTOUT / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18R1 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50UR 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:10 Ending: RES UL TS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - - --- --- -- - - - 'OLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS ------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4204 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program; SF Id/Station: FORTOUT I Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18R1 RESULTS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ROMOCHLOROMETHANE AND 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:10 Ending: -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. .qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --------EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4205 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program:_ SF ld/Station:WATRIN / Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18R2 Org Contractor: A4 RES UL TS UNITS 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0UR UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 1.1 UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 14 UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.S0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:30 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE actual value is known to be less than value given. l-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - - - - - OLA TILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS - -------EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 .sample 4205 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program;_ SF ld/Station:WATRIN / Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18R2 RES UL TS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ~OMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:30 Ending: actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - ----OL.Aiil.ES SAMPLE ANALYSIS --------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 .sample 4206 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF ld/Station:WATKOUT / Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18R3 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS UNITS 0.SOU UG/L O.SOU UG/L O.SOU UG/L O.SOU UG/L O.S0U UG/L 0.SOU UG/L 0.S0U UG/L O.S0U UG/L 5.0U UG/L O.S0U UG/L 0.S0UR UG/L O.S0U UG/L O.SOU UG/L O.S0U UG/L O.S0U UG/L O.S0U UG/L 5.0U UG/L O.SOU UG/L O.SOU UG/L 0.SOU UG/L O.SOU UG/L O.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L O.S0UJ UG/L 0.S0U UG/L O.SOU UG/L 0.SOU UG/L 5.0U UG/L O.SOU UG/L 0.SOU UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L 5.0U UG/L O.S0U UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE} 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE} 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE · 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE} METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS o.sou 0.SOU o.sou 0.SOU 0.SOU o.sou o.sou 0.SOU o.sou o.sou 0.S0U 0.SOU o.sou average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J--estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:35 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB} CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP} 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling a~d reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - -- - --- -- - - - 'OLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS ------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4206 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF ld/Station:wATKOUT / Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18R3 RESULTS a.sou a.sou UNITS UG/L UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ROMOCHLOROMETHANE AND 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:3S Ending: -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-adual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resa~pling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --- - OLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS --------EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA - --·---Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 _Sample 4207 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: CMAYIN / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18R4 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50UR 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 1.4 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:45 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater ihan value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --.sample 4207 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Gastonia, NC - - - - - EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Facility: Davis Park Rd Program~ SF ld/Station:cMAYIN / Media: GROUNDWATER Case No: 30384 RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U 0.71J UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L D No: 18R4 ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE UNKNOWN COMPOUND Org Contractor: A4 1TA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED tOMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES werage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. - ---- - -Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: McConney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:45 Ending: 1ctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed ·for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. 1c indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --. Sample 4208 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: CMAYOUT I Media:GROUNDWATER D No: 18R5 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50UJ a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou O.SOUJ a.sou O.SOUJ S.0U a.sou 0.S0UR a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou S.0U a.sou a.sou O.S0UJ O.SOUJ a.sou a.sou a.sou O.SOUJ a.sou a.sou a.sou S.OU a.sou a.sou a.sou 0.50U S.0U a.sou UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS 0.50U a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou 0.50U a.sou a.sou a.sou 0.SOUJ a.sou -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:50 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unus~ble. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 ----JLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS --.pample 4208 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Gastonia, NC - - - - - EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Facility: Davis Park Rd Program:-SF Case No: 30384 Id/Station: CMAYOUT / Media:GROUNDWATER D No: 18R5 RES UL TS UNITS 0.S0U UG/L 0.S0U UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 WMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. - - - - ---Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/17/2002 18:50 Ending: actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - ---- - - - EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA - - -----Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 .sample 4209 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program~ SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: 2800DPRD / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18R6 Org Contractor: A4 RES UL TS UNITS 0.SOUJ UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UGtL a.sou uGtL a.sou UGtL a.sou UGtL S.OU UG/L a.sou UG/L O.SOUR UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou UG/L S.OU UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou UGtL O.SOUJ UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou UG/L a.sou uGtL 4.3 UG/L O.SOUJ UG/L a.sou uGtL a.sou UG/L 0.SOUJ UG/L S.OU UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.SOUJ UG/L 0.SOUJ UG/L 8.6 UG/L S.OU UG/L a.sou UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/18/2002 1S:1S Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. :1ctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ·----·--Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 . Sample 4209 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: 2800DPRD / Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18R6 RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 ROMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES •average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/18/2002 15:15 Ending: -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --------EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4210 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program:. SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: 2833PPCT / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18R7 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS UNITS O.S0UJ UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L O.SOUJ UG/L O.SOU UG/L O.SOUJ UG/L S.OU UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50UR UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L a.sou UG/L O.SOUJ UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.40J UG/L 0.S0UJ UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.50U UG/L 5.0U UG/L 0.50U UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/18/2002 16:10 Ending: RESULTS UNITS 0.50U UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.50U UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 0.50UJ UG/L a.sou UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J.-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --Sample 421 0 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Gastonia, NC - - - --EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Facility:. Davis Park Rd Program:_ SF Case No: 30384 Id/Station: 2833PPCT / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18R7 RESULTS 0.50U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Org Contractor: A4 :OMOCHLOROMETHANE AND 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES -------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/18/2002 16: 10 Ending: 1verage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. 1ctual value is known to be less than value given. L-adual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. 1c indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - - -------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4211 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility:. Davis Park Rd Program~ SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: 2816DPRD / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18R8 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50UJ 5.0U 0.50U 0.50UR 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.66 0.50UJ 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 12 0.50UJ 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.0U 0.50U 0.50U 0.50U 5.9 5.0U 0.50U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSA TZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 11: 1 0 Ending: RESULTS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.50U UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou uG1L a.sou UG/L 0.S0UJ UG/L a.sou UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE ;i;verage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. :1ctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. ~c indicates that data unusable. coinpound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - -----·---EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4211 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program:.,SF Id/Station: 2816DPRD I Media: GROUNDWATER Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 D No: 18R8 RESULTS UNITS 0.50U UGIL 0.50U UGIL ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE \TA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED Org Contractor: A4 iverage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSA TZ Beginning: 0411912002 11: 1 O Ending: ictual value is known to be less than value given. L--actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the mi_nimum quantitation limit. ~c indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - --------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA _., _____ _ Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4212 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Gastonia, NC Programs SF Case No: 30384 Id/Station: DRUMIDW / Media:GROUNDWATER D No: 18R9 Org Contractor: A4 RES UL TS UNITS 0.S0UJ UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UGIL a.sou UG/L a.sou uG1L 0.S0UJ UG/L a.sou UGIL 0.S0UJ UG/L 1900 UG/L a.sou UGIL 0.S0UR UGIL a.sou UGIL 0.S0UJ UG/L a.sou UG/L a.sou UGIL 0.S0UJ UG/L S.0U UGIL 6.8 UG/L a.sou UGIL 3.4J UGIL 0.S0UJ UGIL a.sou UGIL a.sou UGIL a.sou UGIL 3.6J UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.S0U UG/L a.sou UG/L S.0U UG/L 0.77 UG/L 0.S0U UG/L a.sou uGJL a.sou uGtL S.0U UGIL 0.S0UJ UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE RESULTS 0.S0UJ a.sou a.sou 0.62 a.sou 0.S0UJ a.sou a.sou a.sou 0.S0U a.sou 0.S0UJ a.sou average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requestor: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 12:3S Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENE$ STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE •actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - - -·-OLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS -------·-EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ------Production Date: 05/14/2002 14:51 Sample 4212 FY 2002 Project: 02-0536 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30384 Id/Station: DRUMIDW / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 18R9 RESULTS UNITS 0.50U UG/L 0.50U UG/L 29J UG/L 3.2JN UG/L 5.4JN UG/L ANALYTE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 11 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS HEXANE, 3-METHYL- BENZENE, 1,3,5-TRIMETHYL- Org Contractor: A4 ATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED ROMOCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES -average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Mcconney, John Requester: Project Leader: PVORSATZ Beginning: 04/19/2002 12:35 Ending: -actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantltation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - I I I I I I I I I I I -1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 4 MEMORANDUM Date: 11/14/2002 Science and Ecosystem Support Division 980 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30605-2720 Subject: Results of VOLATILES Sample Analysis 02-1124 Davis Park Rd Gastonia, NC From: Messer, Edward To: Wendel, Je'nnifer CC: Ralph McKeen RACS/W Thru: QA Office Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have any I questions, please contact me. I I I I I I 11 I ATTACHMENT ; I I · ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT I Project :::ase Number: 30961 Number 02-1124 SAS Number NIA I Site ID. Davis Park Road, Gastonia, NC Date: 10/30/02 I Flag <\ffected Samgles Comgound or Fraction Used Reason I VOA )658-9669 methyl acetate R erratic initial calibration I relative response factor )658-9669 isopropylbenzene J erratic continuing I calibration response factor )659,9679 bromodichloromethane J < quantitation limit I )660 tetrachloroethene J < quantitation limit )663 1, 1-dichloroethane J < quantitation limit I )664,9668 methyl tert-butyl ether J < quantitation limit ._;.;· )666 methyl tert-butyl ether, 1,2-dichloroethane, J < quantitation limit I tetrachloroethene )667 trichloroethene, tetrachloroethene J < quantitation limit I )669 chloroform, 1, 1, I-trichloroethane J < quantitation limit )670-9679 methyl acetate R erratic initial & continuing I calibration relative response factors )670-9679 methylcyclohexane J erratic continuing I calibration response factor 1670 bromodichloromethane, bromoforrn J < quantitation limit I 1673 1, 1-dichloroethene, toluene J < quantitation limit 1674 trichloroethene J < quantitation limit I 1675 methyl tert-butyl ether, I, 1-dichloroethane, J < quantitation limit tetrachloroethene I >676 carbon disulfide, 1,4-dichlorobenzene J < quantitation limit I I I I I Case Number: I Site ID. Date: I Affected Samgles I 9680 9680 I 9680,9681 I '1680,968 I I '1681 I BNA ~IA I PEST ~IA I I I I I I I I 30961 ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT Project Number Davis Park Road, Gastonia, NC 10130102 Comgound or Fraction toluene dibromochloromethane, 1,2-dibromoethane, bromoform methyl acetate methylcyclohexane bromodichloromethane 02-1124 Flag Used J J R J J SAS Number NIA Reason < quantitation limit low deuterated monitoring compound recovery erratic initial & continuing calibration relative response factors erratic continuing calibration response factor < quantitation limit - - Sample 9658 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW01 / Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JE2 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U, 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U .0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U UNITS UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-0ICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-0ICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-0ICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BEN2ENE 1,2-0ICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-0ICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-0ICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/24/2002 13:56 Ending: UNITS UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL ANALYTE OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EOB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENE$ STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (OBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R...qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and rearialysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - - 1M -RBN 1~0. •Ns,'!ll Sample 9658 FY 2002 Project: MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW01 / Media: GROUNDWATER ANALYTE 02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 D No: 1JE2 RESULTS UNITS 0.69 JN UG/L BUTYLA TED HYDROXYTOLUENE DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED .. ·J\ Org Contractor: A4 A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/24/2002 13:56 Ending: K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analYzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resamp1ing and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 Sample 9659 FY 2002 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW01TB / - - ... ,., Project: 02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: TRIP BLANK -WATER D No: 1JE4 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 8.8 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 1.4 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U · 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U · 0.29 J 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U · 5.0 U UNITS UG/l UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/l UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/l UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/l UG/l UG/l UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/l UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE · METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/24/2002 07:00 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/l UG/l UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BE'.NZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 Sample 9659 FY 2002 Project: MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW01TB / Media: TRIP BLANK -WATER RESULTS UNITS 1.9 JN UG/L ANALYTE ISOBUTANE ---REtllillltV~,AIIIJIS,- 02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 D No: 1JE4 Org Contractor: A4 DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/24/2002 07:00 Ending: K-·actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 --Sample 9660 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW03 / Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JE7 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 14 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.22 J 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE OICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE . RESULTS . 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/24/2002 15:39 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DJCHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anaiyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verificati?n, Page 1 of 1 - - Sample· 9661 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Id/Station: MW04 I Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JE8 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L. UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 0912412002 10:49 Ending: UNITS UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L. ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BR OMO FORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be pr~sent. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 Sample 9661 FY 2002 Project: MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW04 / Media: GROUNDWATER ANALYTE -02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 D No: 1JE8 RES UL TS UNITS 3.9 JN UG/L BUTYLATED HYDROXYTOLUENE DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED. Org Contractor: A4 A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/24/2002 10:49 Ending: K-actuat value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anal}'zed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verific_ation. Page 1 of 1 Sample 9662 FY 2002 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW05 / - - ..• ,.,. Project: 02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JE9 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 1.9 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL ANALYTE DICHLDRODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE . BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS -0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/23/2002 16:34 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data _unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 ---REIIIJI IV 1111:>, Atla!f.lS, --Sample 9663 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Id/Station: MW06 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JF0 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U . 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.16 J 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.16 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 1.2 5.0 U UNITS UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS . 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/23/2002 14:36 Ending: UNITS UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1 ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. . K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anal)',zed for but not ·detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification: Page 1 of 1 - ---K-N 1\111110, ....,NS,--Sample 9664 FY 2002 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW07 / ···11. Project: 02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JF1 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.17 J 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U · 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE . CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2,DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE . TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS · 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U. 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: · Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/23/2002 12:39 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. . K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 - ---R-N 1'-"lll!lo, -NS,. -Sample 9665 FY 2002 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW08 / ...... Project: 02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JF2 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR . 0.50 U 0.50 U 1.8 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0,50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/23/2002 15:48 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALY,:E DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE j ,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was an~lyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R..qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verifica~ion. Page 1 of 1 · 1 -LA~ S ... E A .. SI~ - - ~ • i2 J l.. 1llllso, -=N~ -,:: Sample 9666 FY 2002 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW09 / ... ~ . Project: 02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JF3 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.16 J 0.50 U 0,67 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.44 J 8.6 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0,50 U 0.36 J 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/23/2002 15:10 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was an'alyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resarnpling and _reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 --Sample 9667 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Id/Station: MW10 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JF5 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U o.5o·u 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U. 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.16 J 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.18 J 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L· UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 0METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. . -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/24/2002 09:31 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was an'~lyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling a·nd reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 ---;fa3lb,.1"'5o, -N-.. Sample 9668 FY 2002 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW11 I . .::-.. Project: 02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JF6 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.47 J 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE [TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE [TETRACHLOROETHYLENE). METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50.UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/2412002 07:54 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L. UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was an~lyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and re.analysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 -Sample 9669 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Id/Station: MW17 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JG2 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.25 J 0.47 J 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 13 0.50 U. 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.7 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L · UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE . RESUL,:s 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U · A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence ot·preSence of material. Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/2412002 11 :37 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was an~_lyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verificaticin. Page 1 of 1 : j ·• q l --Sample 9670 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW01 RB / Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK D No: 1JE3 ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 6.2 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE 5.0 U 0.50 U 1.4 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.29 J 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.23 J 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/25/2002 16:22 Ending: UNITS UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was ana_lyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 Sample 9670 FY 2002 Project: MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW01 RB/ Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK RES UL TS UNITS 3.4 JN UG/L ANALYTE ISOBUTANE --02-1124 Gastonia, NC . Case No: 30961 D No: 1JE3 DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED Org Contractor: A4 -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/25/2002 16:22 Ending: A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. . K-actual value is known to be less than value giveri. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-maierial was an~lyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verificati6n. Page 1 of 1 _LA.., sJM.E A .. SI~ --Sample 9671 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Id/Station: MW02 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JE5 ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.51 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.52 0.58 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 6.1 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 3.7, 5.0 U CARBON DISULFIDE METl,IYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE .1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1, 3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 u. 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NA1-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of pres.ence of material. -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/25/2002 11 :59 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALY,TE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM. ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is l<nown to be greater than value given. LI-material was al'lalyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verificatiOn .. Page 1 of 1 --tllti.-r Sample 9672 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Id/Station: MW12 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JF7 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 2.3 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 1.1 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/25/2002 17:05 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was arif:llyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitalion limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 --9A _ 11!111:,N -SD,.EN,.. Sample 9673 FY 2002 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW13 / .. ,, Project: 02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JF8 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.15 J 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.19 J 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U UNITS UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L . UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 0912612002 10:53 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value _is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was an'atyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 -Sample 9673 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW13 / Media: GROUNDWATER ANALYTE PROPENE Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 D No: 1JF8 RESULTS 0.84 JN 0.72 JN 2.8 JN UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L 1-HEXANOL, 2-ETHYL- BUTYLATED HYDROXYTOLUENE DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED Org Contractor: A4 -Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/26/2002 10:53 Ending: A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. . K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was arialyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 ,.·l -Sample 9674 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLA TIL:ES SCAN Facilily: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW14 / Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JF9 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.49 J 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (fREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/25/2002 15:38 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was a~alyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 allJLA~ ::i ..... l: Al" __ IYr :;1:Jll!!I -.. -,..r _...,IN illll:;o,-=N~ ·- Sample 9674 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Id/Station: MW14 / Media: GROUNDWATER RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE 0.72 J UG/L UNKNOWN COMPOUND Case No: 30961 D No: 1JF9 DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED Org· Contractor: A4 Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/25/2002 15:38 Ending: A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is·known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was a~'alyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimulTl quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 Sample 9675 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Id/Station: MW15 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JG0 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.25 J 0.20 J 3.6 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 50 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U. 0.50 U 0.31 J 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE . VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/26/2002 14:17 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYJE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actua1 value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was an'~lyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. · Page 1 of 1 1111 Sample 9675 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW15 I Media: GROUNDWATER ANALYTE PROPENE Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 D No: 1JGO RESULTS UNITS 0.61 JN UG/L 3.3 JN UG/L BUTYLATED HYDROXYTOLUENE DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED Org Contractor: A4 A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/2612002 14: 17 Ending: K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anatyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 Sample 9676 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF ld/Station:MW16 / Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JG1 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.29 J 0.50 UR 0.50 U · 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ·UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS . 0.50 U. 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.33 J 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/26/2002 11 :49 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) · CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA~not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-materia1 was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resamptin_g and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 .Sample 9677 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW18D / Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JG3 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 6.0 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 10 5.0 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) . METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 .u 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/25/2002 13:26 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actuat value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was an~lyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. · Page 1 of 1 Sample 9678 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Id/Station: MW18 / Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JG4 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 6.1 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 10 5.0 U UNITS UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1_,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/25/2002 13:23 Ending: UNITS UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than vatue given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anaiyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 llillll:A -SAJ.illll: AiJl!ills1s -- Sample 9679 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW03FB / Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JG5 ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 7.4 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE 5.0 U 0.50 U 1.6 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.38 J 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYLT-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE . RESULTS . 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/26/2002 09:30 Ending: UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENE$ STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compou_nd may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page fol 1 Sample 9679 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW03FB / Media: GROUNDWATER RESULTS UNITS 1.8 JN UG/L ANALYTE ISOBUTANE Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 D No: 1JG5 DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB. IDS NOT VERIFIED ··'·" Org Contractor: A4 A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. . Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/26/2002 09:30 Ending: K-actua\ value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value gi\_'en. U-material was anal)'.zed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R...qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 on Sample . 9680 FY 2002 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Id/Station: MW1 PW / / ... ,., Project: 02-1124 Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JG6 Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 530 U 50 U 50 UR 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 500 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 UJ 50 U 50 U 50 U 500 U 31 J 50 U 50 U 50 U 500 U UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE RESULTS 50 UJ 50 UJ 50 U 120 64 50 U 50 UJ 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/26/2002 14:35 Ending: UNITS UG/L UGIL UGIL UG/L UG/L UGIL UG/L UGIL . UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UGIL UGIL UGIL ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE r 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was ana1Y2.ed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 .-.i -R~1vW,O,~s,Wl!ill Sample 9680 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Id/Station: MW1 PW I Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1JG6 RESULTS 78 J 140 J 73 JN 94 JN UNITS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L ANALYTE CYCLOTRISILOXANE, HEXAMETHYL CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETH BENZENE, 1, 2, 4-TRIMETHYL- NONADECANE DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED Org Contractor: A4 Produced by: Messer, Edward Requestor: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/2612002 14:35 Ending: A-average va_lue. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual ~alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analy~ed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. Page 1 of 1 Sample 9681 FY 2002 Project: 02-1124 VOLATILES SCAN Facility: Davis Park Rd Program: SF Gastonia, NC Case No: 30961 Id/Station: MW02TB / Media:TRIP BLANK-WATER D No: 1JE6 ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROM OM ETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) Org Contractor: A4 RESULTS 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 8.6 U 0.50 U 0.50 UR 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U UNITS UG/L UGIL UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE 5.0 U 0.50 U 1.4 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 UJ 0.50 U 0.30 J 0.50 U 5.0 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 5.0 U CARBON DISULFIDE METHYL ACETATE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE Produced by: Messer, Edward. Requester: Project Leader: JWENDEL Beginning: 09/26/2002 14:45 Ending: RES UL TS UNITS 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U . UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L 0.50 U UG/L ANALYTE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE TOTAL XYLENES STYRENE BROMOFORM ISOPROPYLBENZENE 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyi:ed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resamp1ing and reanalysis is necesSary for verification. Page 1 of 1