NCD986175644_19960319_Davis Park Road TCE Site_FRBCERCLA SPD_Proposed Administrative Order on Consent-OCR

r,,
I
I
I
I
' " la
•• •• •• •1
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC_TION AGENCY
,, I REGl~J IV
345 co'uRTLANO STREET. N.E.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30365 . I .
lU" j ~ •1~~-' 11,.,r. . . u
' GENERAL AND SPECIAL NOTICE LETTER FOR
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY {RI/FS)
URGENT LEGAL MATTER··PROMPT REPLY REQUESTED
CERTIFIED MAIL--RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Acme Petroleum and Fuel Company cf o Mr. John Adams Hodge-· ···-·1
1201 Main Street, Suite 2400 '
Post Office Drawer 7157
Columbia, South Carolina 292:02
i
SUBJ: , I Davis Park TCE Superfund Site (the Site)
Gastonia, ·'·North Ca·rolina
Dear Mr. Hodge:
Pi:= r,i=" ,c n
MAR 2, 2 1996
SUPt:KrUNO St.GI ,UI~·
The purpose of this letter is to notify Acme Petroleum and
Fuel Company (ACME) of the potential liability, as defined by
Section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), as
amended, that ACME may have i~curred with respect to the
above-referenced Site. This letter also notifies ACME that a
60-day period of formal negotiations with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the performance and funding of
upcoming response activities at the Site begins upon receipt,
which EPA deems to be five (5) calendar days from the date of
this letter. In addition, this letter provides general and
site-specific information to assist ACME in these negotiations,
specifically a draft Administrative Order on Consent and a Scope
of Work.
' As the enclosed ExpandedlSite Inspection Report details, the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
documented the release or threatened release of hazardous
substances, pollutants and contaminants at the above-referenced
Site. EPA has spent public funds and is considering spending
additional public funds on actions to investigate or control such
releases or threatened releases at the Site. Unless EPA reaches
an agreement under which a potentially responsible party (PRP) or
parties (PRPs) will properly perform or finance such actions, EPA
will perform these actions pursuant to Section 104 of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C § 9604. By this letter) EPA notifies ACME of the
opportunity to perform the response activities outlined below. '
I
I
I
I
I .. .. ..
•• ••
11
'• I I
'• '•
I
I
I
I
' NOTICE OF POTENTIAL LIABILITY
Potentially responsible,parties under CERCLA include: the current owners or operators of the Site; persons who at the time of disposal of hazardous substances owned or operated the Site; persons.who by contract, agreement, or otherwise arranged for disposal or treatment, or arranged with a transporter for disposal or treatment of haz~rdous substances; and persons who accept or accepted any hazardous substance-for transport to disposal facilities and selected such facilities. Under CERCLA and other laws, PRPs may be liable for all funds expended by the United States Government in responding to any release or threat of release at the Site, including planning, investigation, cleanup and enforcement activities associated with the Site. In addition, PRPs may be required to pay damages for injury to natural resources or for their destruction or loss, together with the cost of assessing such damages.
I
Based on information received during the investigation of this Site, EPA believes thatlACME, as a former operator of the Site at the time of disposal,of hazardous substances at the Site, may be a responsible party urider Section 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
§ 9607(a). Before the United States Government undertakes further response actions, EPA requests that ACME voluntarily I perform the work necessary to address any releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances from the Site .
SPECIAL NOTICE AND NEGOTIATION MORATORIUM
EPA has determined that :a period of negotiation would facilitate settlement betwee~ EPA and ACME. Therefore, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 9622(e), a 60-day moratorium on certain EPA response activities at the si!te will begin five (5) calendar days from the date of this letter.I During this 60-day period ACME is invited to submit a good faith offer to EPA to conduct the RI/FS. The contents of an acceptable1 good faith offer are set forth below. Upon the submission 0
1f a good faith offer, formal negotiations between the parties towards a settlement providing for ACME to conduct or finance the RI/FS may begin. These negotiations will continue for the remaining days of the initial 60-day period, if the offer is submitted prior to the 60th day, and for an additional 30 days1, if necessary. If a settlement is reached between EPA and ACME within the 60-day moratorium period, the settlement will be embodied in an Administrative Order on Consent.
1 Pursuant to Section 122 (e) (4) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
§ 9622 (e) (4), if a good faith: offer is not received within the 60-day notice period, EPA may 1 take appropriate action at the Site. However, EPA reserves the right to take action at the Site at any time in the event thatja significant threat requiring EPA's immediate response aris~s. ·
A good faith offer is a o/ritten proposal which demonstrates
I
I
I
I
I ..
la
It
••
'• •• ••
I I
I I
'• 11
I
I
I
3
the ACME's qualifications and willingness to conduct or finance
the RI/FS .. A good faith off~r to conduct or finance the RI/FS
will include the following elements:
I
1. A statement of willlingness by ACME to conduct or
finance the RI/FS which is consistent with the enclosed
draft Administrative Order on Consent and Scope of Work
and which provides a sufficient basis for further • , I negotiations .
2. A paragraph by paragraph response to the draft
Administrative Order on Consent and Scope of Work.
I 3. A demonstration of the ACME's technical capability to
carry out the RI/Fs:including the identification.of the
firm(s) that would be used to conduct the work or a
description of the process they will use to select the
firm(s).
4. A demonstration of ACME's capability and willingness to
finance the RI/FS. I
5. A statement of ACME',s willingness to reimburse EPA for
costs incurred in o~erseeing ACME's conduct of the
RI/FS.
6. The name, address and telephone number of the party who
will represent ACME iin negotiations.
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
Pursuant to CERCLA Sectioh 113(k), 42 U.S.C. § 9613(k), EPA
will establish the administrative record that will contain
documents that will form the basis of EPA's decision on the
selection of a response action1 for the Site. This administrative
record will be open to the public for inspection and comment. I .
PRP RESPONSE AND EPA CONTACT PERSON
I
Section 122(e) of CERCLA, :42 U.S.C. § 9622(e), provides that
ACME has 60 days from the recetpt of this notice to make a good
faith offer to EPA. However, ~CME is requested to provide EPA
with a letter of intent within 10 calendar days of receipt of
this letter. The letter of intent should state whether ACME is
willing to enter into negotiations to perform and finance the
RI/FS; and whether ACME is wil~ing to reimburse EPA for past
response costs.
If EPA does not receive a !timely response, EPA will assume
that ACME does not wish to negotiate a resolution of its
liabilities in connection with \the response, and that ACME has
declined any involvement in perlorming these response activities.
I
I
I
I
' ' " -.
•• •• ••
11
I I
'• '•
I
I
I
I
4
ACME may be held liable under,Section 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607, for the cost of the response actions which EPA performs at the Site and for any damages to natural resources.
ACME's response to this notice letter should be sent to: I
' Mr. Rolando E. Bascurnbe
Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
I
If you have any legal questions pertaining to this matter, please direct them to Mr. Rolando E. Bascurnbe at 404/347-2641, extension 2275. Please direct any technical questions which you may have to Ms. Kay Crane, Remedial Project Manager, at 404/347-3555, extension 2079. ·
Due to the seriousness of the problem at the Site and the legal ramifications of ACME's ifailure to respond promptly, EPA strongly encourages you to give this matter your immediate attention and to respond withi,n the time specified above.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter .
~~~f d~~f~~, Director
Waste Management Division
Enclosures
cc: Jack Butler, Chief 1 CERCLA Branch, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
James Lee, United States Department of Interior :
I
I
I
I
' ' la
°' •• •• ••
11
I I
I I
lg
D
I
I UNITED STATES ENVIR9NMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV
IN THE MATTER OF: )
)
Davis Park Road TCE
Site
Superfund)
Acme Petroleum Fuel
and Oil Company
and
Gastonia, North Carolina
Respondent
)
)
)' i:
):
) '
) ;
},
)1 _______________ )
Proceeding under Sections 104,
122(a) and 112(d) (3) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation
and Liability Act of 1980,
as amended, 42 u.s.c.
§§ 9604 and 9622.
EPA Docket No. :
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER BY CONSENT
FOR REMEDIAL INVESTlGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY
I. JURISDICTION
I
This Administrative Order by Cbnsent (Consent Order) is entered
into by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
with Acme Petroleum and Fuel Oil Company (Respondent), pursuant
to the authority vested in the iPresident of the United States by
Sections 104, 122(a) and 122(d)i(3) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compen~ation and Liability Act of 1980
(CERCLA), as amended, 42 u.s.c.\ §§ 9604, 9622 (a) and 9622 (dl (3).
This authority was delegated by, the President to the
Administrator of the EPA by Exe,c. Order No. 12580, dated January
23, 1987, 52 Fed. Reg. 2923 (Jan. 29, 1987), and was further
delegated to the Regional Administrator of Region IV EPA and
re-delegated to the Director, W~ste Management Division.
Respondent agrees to undertake all actions required by the terms
and conditions of this Consent Order for the conduct and
implementation of the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Study (RI/FS). The Respondent consents to and will not contest
EPA jurisdiction regarding this!Order.
II. PARTIES BOUND
This Consent Order shall apply to and be binding upon EPA and the
Respondent, its agents, successdrs, assigns, officers, directors,
and principals. Respondent is jlointly and severally responsible
I
I
I
I
I
' .. ..
"' ••
•1
•1
'• I I
'• '•
I
I
I
I
2
I
for carrying out all actions !required of it by this Consent
Order. The signatories to t~is Consent Order certify that they
are authorized to execute anq legally bind the parties they
represent to this Consent Order. No change in the ownership or
corporate status of the Resp~ndent shall alter its
responsibilities under this Consent Order.
I
The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Consent Order to any
subsequent owners or successo'rs before ownership rights are . . I transferred. The Respondent shall provide a copy of this Consent
Order to all contractors, sub'contractors, laboratories, and
consultants which are retaine~ to conduct any work performed
under this Consent Order, within fourteen (14) days after the
effective date of this Consent Order or the date of retaining
their services, whichever is later. ·Respondent shall condition
any such contracts upon satisfactory compliance with this Consent
Order. Notwithstanding the terms of any contract, Respondent is
responsible for compliance with this Consent Order and for
ensuring that its subsidiaries, employees, contractors, ' consultants, subcontractors and agents comply with this Consent
Order. I
I III. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
'
In entering into this Consent[order, the mutual objectives of -EPA
and Respondent are: (A) with ~espect to the Remedial
Investigation (RI), to determine fully the nature and extent of
the threat to the public health or welfare or the environment
caused by the release or threatened release of hazardous
substances, pollutants, or contaminants at or from the Site into
the environment; and (B) with 1respect to the Feasibility Study
(FS), to develop and evaluate :alternatives for remedial action to
prevent, mitigate or otherwise. respond to the migration or the
release or threatened release 'of hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants ftom the Site; and (C) to recover
response and oversight costs i 1ncurred by EPA with respect to this
consent order. 1
The activities conducted pursuant to this Consent Order will be
consistent with the National cbntingency Plan (NCP), 40 C.F.R.
Part 300, et mag., and will be! subject to the express EPA
approvals as set forth below. ·
IV. FINDINGS OF FACTS
' I The following constitutes an outline of the facts upon which
this Consent Order is based: I
I
A. The Davis Park Road TCE Site (the Site) is located
between Hudson Boulevard and Penny Park Drive in the City of
Gastonia, North Carolina. Thelsite encompasses an area of
approximately 20 acres. The Site can be found on the Gastonia
I
I
I
I
' ,.
..
la
•• ••
11
•1
ID
lu
Im
I
I
I
I
3
I
South, North Carolina USGS 7 .\5' Quadrangle Map at latitude 35°0
13' 56" N and longitude 81° 13' 08" w. Since 1966, the Site has
been in use as a convenient s'tore/car repair and service shop.
The Site was first discovered\ in April 1990, after North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR) conducted a routinei sampling event on the community
well for the Cedar Oak Park subdivision. Trichloroethane (TCE)
and cis-1,2-dichloroethene were detected in the samples along
with several petroleum constituents.
I
B. Acme Petroleum and Fuel Oil Company is a gasoline
distributor, incorporated under the laws of the State of North
Carolina. I
I
C. From 1966 through 1981, Respondent leased the facility
from Mr. Carl Bell. The facillity consisted initially of a mini-
mart and gasoline dispensing p'umps, with subsequent construction,
by Respondent, of two automobi,le service bays. During the period
of Respondent's tenancy, Respordent made arrangements with
several individuals by which they were granted permission to
conduct auto repair activities\ in the service bays.
I
I
D. Preliminary test results indicate that the Site will
rank for purposes of inclusionion the National Priority List
(NPL). Upon completing the fiil.al review of the Hazardous Rank:i:ng
Scoring (HRS) Package, the Site will be proposed for listing on
the NPL. I
I E. During the period of Respondent's arrangements with
these individuals, the service !repairs conducted at the bays
consisted of auto transmission '.and engine repair work, as well as
other related activities. As~ result of poor operating
practices by these individuals,\ waste oil containing chlorinated
solvents was released onto the soil through a drain line behind
the service bays. The waste oii migrated through the.soil and
into the groundwater. Groundwater samples taken beneath the Site
and nearby wells indicate the presence of volatile organic
compounds, including, but not limited to, trichloroethene (TCE),
tetrachlorethane (PCE) and 1,2-Dichloroethene (DCE).
I
F. During Respondent's teil.ancy at the Site, Respondent was
aware of the production of by-products from the activities being
conducted at the Site, including the generation of waste oil.
The subject waste oil being everitually disposed of through the
drain line located behind the service bays.
' l G. Trichloroethene, tetrachloroethane, and
1, 2-dichloroethane are all class1ified as B2 probable human
carcinogens. TCE is a chemical which affects the central nervous
system in humans. Human experimental studies revealed that
exposure to TCE can affect motor\ coordination, visual perception;
I
I
I
I
·1
I ..
la ..
•• ••
11
11
I I
11
11
I
I
I
I
4
and cognition. Major routes1of exposure for TCE are inhalation
and oral. Exposure to DCE in air may cause nausea, drowsiness
and fatigue. ,
I
H. The topography of the Site is relatively flat but slopes
westerly towards Crowder Creek. The elevation at the Site ranges
from approximately 770 feet to 660 feet at Crowder Creek. The
Site is located within the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The
formation is described as a coarse grain, porphyritic,
well-foliated biotite granite. Most of the domestic and
industrial water need is· sup~lied by individual and community
wells. These wells have an average depth of 180 feet for schist
wells and 165 for granite wells.
' I. The nature of the release reflects years of unregulated
disposal waste generated durjJng the operation of the Site as a
service station and/or auto transmission and repair facility .
PCE and/or TCE were released :from the Site into the environment
through a drain line install~d in the service bay area of the
building and which ultimateli discharged onto the ground. In
addition, evidence exists whi1ch suggest at some time during the
operations, waste was routinely poured-directly onto the ground
behind the facility. This di1sposal practice has resulted in
contaminated soil and contaminated groundwater.
I
J. There are 162 private residences within a 1/4 radius of
the Site which rely on groundwater for potable water. According
to data collected during a De~ember 1995 Well Survey Report,
there are 98 supply wells, pr'.i.vate and community, located
throughout the Site. The closest domestic well is located at the
Doris Corella residence, about 150 feet south of the Site. The
closest community well is thel Cedar Oak Park Subdivision well
located less than 1/4 mile from the Site. The Cedar.Oak Park
Subdivision well serves 26 residences.
K. Consequences of the kocumented releases include actual
and potential exposure of humans to B2 carcinogenic substances
via ingestion of, dermal contact with and inhalation of
contaminants in the groundwater. Additionally, on-site workers
and site trespassers may potertially be exposed to carcinogenic
substances through the inhalation pathway due to the existing
soil contamination at the Sit~. ·
I L. In August, 1991, NCDEHNR collected soil samples from an
area at the rear of the facility which house the service bay and
car lift. In January 1994, a~ Expanded Site Investigation was
conduct by NCDEHNR which confirmed the presence of hazardous
substances in the groundwater!and soil at the Site and in nearby
private as well as public water supply wells.
I
I
I
I
I .. .. .. .,
••
'• 11
I I
'• 11
I
I
I
I
5
I V. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
I
A. The Site is a facility within the meaning of Section
101(9) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(9).
' B. The Respondent is alperson as defined in Section 101(21)
of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(21).
C. The Respondent is a!responsible party under Section
107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. ~ 9607(a) .
. D. Contaminants found at the Site as described in Section
IV above are hazardous substances within the meaning of Section
101(14) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C'. !§ 9601(14), or constitute a
pollutant or contaminant that may present an imminent and
substantial danger to the public health or welfare under Section
104 (a) (1) of CERCLA, 42 u.s.d. 9604 {a) (1) .
E. The hazardous substa'nces described have been released
into the environment and its potential migration pathways
constitute both an actual release and threatened release within
the meaning of Section 101(22) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(22).
'
VI. DETERMINATIONS
Based on the Findings of Factland Conclusions of Law set out
above, EPA has determined that:
I
A. The actual and/or threatened release of hazardous
substances from the Site may present an imminent and substantial
endangerment to the public health or welfare or the environment. ' . I
B. The actions reqJired by this Consent Order are
necessary to protect the public health and/or welfare and/or the
environment.
I
C. In accordance with Section 104(a) (1) of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C. § 9604(a) (1), EPA has determined that the work to be
performed pursuant to this Consent Order, if performed according
to the terms of this Order, w~ll be done properly and promptly by
the Respondent. EPA has also !determined that the Respondent is
qualified to.conduct such worK. ·
I
' VII. WORK.TO BE PERFORMED
'
All aspects of the Work to be performed by Respondent pursuant to
this Consent Order shall be under the ·direction and supervision
of a qualified contractor who ~hall be a qualified professional
engineer or geologist with expertise in hazardous site cleanup,
the selection of which shall be subject to approval by EPA.
Within fifteen (15) days after! the effective date of this Consent
Order, Respondent shall submit, to EPA in writing the name, title,
I
I
I
I
I
' ,.
-. ._
11
11
••
I I
I I
'1
11
I
I
I
I
6
and qualifications of any supervising contractor proposed to be
used in carrying out the RI/fS to be performed pursuant to this
Consent Order. Respondent shall also advise EPA of the name,'
title, and qualifications oflthe contractor proposed to be used
in carrying out the risk assessment portion of the RI/FS. EPA
shall notify the Respondent of its approval or disapproval in
writing, within twenty (20) calendar days of its receipt of this
submission by the Respondenti ·
I
If EPA disapproves of the selection of any contractor, Respondent
shall submit a list of alternate contractors to EPA within
fifteen (15) days of receipt,of EPA's disapproval of the
contractor previously selected. EPA shall, within twenty (20)
calendar days of receipt of the list, provide written notice of
the names of the contractors'that it approves. The Respondent
may at their election select any one from that list. Respondent
shall notify EPA of the name of the contractor selected within
fifteen (15) calendar days of EPA's notice of the approved
contractors.
If, at any time thereafter, Respondent proposes to change any
contractor, Respondent shall 1give written notice to EPA and shall
obtain approval from EPA before the new contractor performs any
work under this Consent Orde~.
Based on the foregoing, it
the following work will be
is hereby AGREED TO AND ORDERED that
I performed: I
A. Within forty-five (4'5) calendar days of the effective . ' ' date of this Consent Order, Respondents shall submit to EPA. a
plan for a complete Remedial !Investigation and Feasibility Study
(RI/FS Work Plan). The RI/FS Work Plan shall be. developed and
submitted in conjunction with' a Sampling and Analysis Plan and a
Health and Safety Plan, altho;ugh each plan may be delivered under
separate cover. These plans ,shall be developed in accordance
with the National Contingency! Plan and the attached Scope of Work
(SOW) (Attachment 1) which is hereby made a part of this Consent
Order as if fully set forth herein. The RI/FS Work Plan shall
include a comprehensive description of the work to be performed,
the medias to be investigated! (i.e., air, groundwater, surface
water, surface and subsurface! soils and sediments, etc.) , the
methodologies to be utilized,, and the rationale for the selection
of each methodology. A comprehensive schedule for completion of
each major activity required py this Consent Order, including the
submission of each deliverable listed in the RI/FS Scope of Work.
Such schedule shall reflect shbmittal of the Draft Feasibility
Study within 300 calendar days of the effective date of this
Consent Order. '
The Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) shall include procedures to
ensure that sample collectioniand analytical activities are
conducted in accordance with technically acceptable protocols and
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
I
I
B
I
I
I
I
7
that the data generated will 'imeet the Data Quality Objectives
(DQOs) established. The SAP provides a mechanism for planning
field activities and consists of a Field Sampling and Analysis
Plan (FSAP) and a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP).
I
' The FSAP shall define in detail the sampling and data-gathering
methods that shall be used on the project. It shall include·
sample objectives, sample location (horizontal and vertical) and
frequency, sampling equipment' and procedures, and sample handling
and analysis. The QAPP shall, describe the project objectives and
organization, functional activities, and quality assurance and
quality control (QA/QC)·proto'cols that shall be used to achieve
' • I the desired DQOs. 1
A Health and Safety Plan shal~ be prepared in conformance with
the Respondent's health and safety program and OSHA regulations
and protocols.
B. Respondent will impl~ment the RI/FS Work Plan approved
by EPA. The EPA approved RI/FS Work Plan and any EPA approved
amendments thereto will be attached to and incorporated in this
Consent Order as Attachment 21• The RI/FS will be conducted in
accordance with the schedule contained in the RI/FS Work Plan as
approved by EPA. i
I C. Within seven (7) calendar days of the approval of the
·RI/FS Work Plan by EPA, Respondent will commence work on Task 1
of the RI/FS Work Plan. :
I D. Respondent shall perform the Baseline Risk Assessment.
The major components of the Baseline Risk Assessment include
contaminant identification, e~posure assessment, toxicity
assessment, and human health and ecological risk .
characterization. Respondentlshall prepare the baseline risk
assessment in accordance with\pertinent EPA guidance,· including
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), EPA/540/1-89/002,
December 1989.
Respondent shall prepare J Baseline Risk Assessment Report
based on the data collected during the Site Characterization.
EPA will release this Report to the public at the same time it
releases the final RI Report. j Both reports will be put into the
administrative record for the ,Site.
EPA will respond to all sjJgnificant comments on the Baseline
Risk Assessment that are resu8mitted during the formal comment
period in the Responsiveness s;ummary of the Record of Decision.
E. Respondent shall submit to EPA written monthly progress
reports which: (1) describe Ute actions which have been taken
toward achieving compliance wi:th this Consent Order during the
previous month; (2) include al:l results of sampling and tests and
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8
' I
all other data received by Re~pondent during the course of the
work; (3) include all plans and procedures completed under the
Work Plan during the previouslmonth; (4) describe all actions,
data, and plans which are sch~duled for the next month, and
provide other information relating to the progress of the work as
deemed necessary by EPA; and !(5) include information regarding
percentage of completion, unresolved delays, encountered or
anticipated, that may affect the future schedule for
implementation of the Scope of Work and/or RI/FS Work Plans, and
a description of efforts made·1 to mitigate those delays or
anticipated delays. These progress reports are to be ·submitted
to EPA by the fifth day of every month following the effective
date of this Consent Order. :
I
F. Deliverables, including reports, plans or other
correspondence to·be submitted pursuant to this Consent Order,
shall be sent by regular certified mail, express mail or
overnight delivery to the following addresses or to such other
addresses as the EPA hereafter may designate in writing.
I
I Ms. Kay Crane 1
Remedial Project Manager
• I EPA-Region IV ,
I ' ' • Waste Management Division
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365 . . I
The number of copies to be submitted to EPA for each deliverable
is identified in the RI/FS Scope of Work. The State of North
Carolina, serving as a support Agency shall receive two copies of
each RI/FS deliverable. Two copies shall be sent to:
I
Mr. Jack Butler :
North Carolina ~epartment of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
401 Oberlin road
P.O. Box 27687 I
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
I
Documents to be submitted to the Respondent's Project Coordinator
should be sent to:
I
I G. EPA may determine that other tasks, including remedial
investigatory work and/or engirteering evaluation, are necessary
as part of an RI/FS in addition to EPA-approved tasks and
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9
I
deliverables, including reports, which have been completed
pursuant to this Consent Ord~r. The Respondent shall implement
any additional tasks which EP,A determines. are necessary as part
of the RI/FS and which are in addition to the tasks detailed in
the RI/FS Work Plan. The additional work shall be completed in
accordance with the standards:, specifications, and schedule
determined or. approved by EPA.
'
VIII. SUBMISSIONS 1REOUIRING AGENCY APPROVAL
I
A. EPA reserves the right to comment on, modify and direct
changes for all deliverables.1 Upon receipt of any plan, report
or other item which is required to be submitted for approval
pursuant to this Consen.t Order, EPA. shall either: (1) approve the
submission; or (2) disapprove! the submission, notifying
Respondent of deficiencies. ;rt such submission is disapproved,
EPA shall either: (1) notify ~he Respondent that EPA will modify
the submission to cure the deficiencies; or (2) direct the
Respondent to modify the submission to cure the deficiencies.
I .
B. Upon receipt of a notice of disapproval and notification
directing modification of thelsubmission, Respondent shall,
within thirty (30) days, cure:the deficiencies and resubmit the
plan, report, or other item f9r approval. Notwithstanding the
notice of disapproval, Respondent shall proceed to take any
action required by any non-deficient portion of the submission.
c. In the event of approval or modification of the
submittal by EPA, Respondent shall proceed to take any action
required by the plan, report, ior other item, as approved or
modified. '
' I
D. If, upon resubmission, the plan, report, or item is not
approved, Respondent shall beldeemed to be in violation of this
Consent Order and stipulated penalties shall begin to accrue
pursuant to Section XVI of th~s Consent Order. EPA retains the
right to seek stipulated or s~atutory penalties, to require the
amendment of the document, to 1perform additional studies, to
conduct a· complete RI/FS pursuant to its authority under CERCLA,
and to take any other action, !including, but not limited to,
enforcement action to recover its costs pursuant to its authority
under CERCLA. .
E. Neither failure of EPA to expressly approve or
disapprove of Respondent's del:iverables within a specified time
period, nor the absence of comments, shall be construed as
approval by EPA. Respondent i's responsible for preparing and
submitting deliverables acceptable to EPA.
in,
and
'
F. Respondent shall makel presentations at, and participate
meetings at the request of EPA during the initiation, conduct
completion of the RI/FS. [n addition to the discussion of
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10
I the technical aspects of the RI/FS, topics will include
anticipated problems or new i'ssues. · Meetings will be scheduled
at EPA's discretion. 1
I
G. The provisions of th~is Consent Order shall govern all
proceedings regarding the RI/FS work conducted pursuant to this
Consent Order. In the event of any inconsistency between this
Consent Order and any require~ deliverable submitted by
Respondent, the inconsistency
1
will be resolved in favor of this
Consent Order. I
IX. DESIGNATED PROJECT COORDINATORS
A. On or before the eff~ctive date of this Consent Order,
EPA and Respondent will each designate a Project Coordinator and
an Alternate Project Coordinator. The "Project Coordinator" for
EPA will be the Remedial Project Manager (RPM) or the On-Scene
Coordinator (OSC) responsible!for this Site. Each Project
Coordinator will be responsible for overseeing the implementation
of. this Consent Order. The EPA Project Coordinator will be EPA's
designated representative at the Site. To the maximum extent
possible, communications between Respondent and EPA, including
all documents, reports, approvals, and other correspondence
concerning the activities performed. pursuant to the terms and
conditions of this Consent Order, will be directed through the
Project Coordinators. !
B. EPA and Respondent elch have the.right to change their
respective Project Coordinator. Such a change will be
accomplished by notifying the1other party in writing at least
five (5) calendar days prior ~o the change.
I
C. The EPA designated Project Coordinator will have the
authority vested in an RPM oriosc by the National Contingency
Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300, as amended. This includes the
authority to halt, conduct, or direct any work required by this
Consent Order, or any response actions or portions thereof when
he or she determines that conditions may present an immediate
risk to public health or welf~re or the environment.
! D. The absence of the EPA Project Coordinator from the Site
shall not be cause for the stoppage or delay of work.
I
' E. EPA shall arrange for a qualified person to assist in
its oversight and review of the conduct of the RI/FS, as required
by Section 104 (a) of CERCLA, 412 U.S. C. 9 604 (a) . The oversight
assistant may observe work and make inquiries in the absence of
EPA, but is not authorized to modify the work plan.
I
X. QUALITY ASSURANCE,: SAMPLING AND DATA ANALYSIS
' I
A. Respondent shall use '.quality assurance, quality control,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
and chain of custody procedures in accordance with EPA's "Interim
Guidelines and Specifications For Preparing Quality Assurance
Project Plans" (QAMS-005/80) ,and the "EPA Region IV Engineering
Support Branch Standard OperJting Procedures and Quality
Assurance Manual (U.S. EPA Region IV, Environmental Services
Division, February 1, 1991), jand subsequent amendments to such
guidelines. Prior to the commencement of any monitoring project
under this Consent Order,. Respondent shall submit for review,
modification and/or approval iby EPA, a Quality Assurance Project
Plan ("QAPP") that is consistent with applicable guidelines.
Sampling data generated consi!stent with the QAPP(s) shall be
admissible as evidence, without objection, in any proceeding
under Section XIV of this Cortsent Order. Respondent shall assure
that EPA personnel or authori:zed representatives are allowed
access to any laboratory util1ized by Respondent in implementing
this Consent Order. 1
B. Respondent shall mak'e available to EPA the results of
all sampling and/or tests or bther data generated by Respondent
with respect to the implementation of this Consent Order and
shall submit these results in[ monthly progress reports as
described in Section VII.E. of this Consent Order.
I
C. At the request of EPA, Respondent shall allow split or
duplicate samples to be taken! by EPA, and/or their authorized
representative, of any samples collected by Respondent pursuant
to the implementation of thislconsent Order. Respondent shall
notify EPA not less than four~een (14) days in advance of any
sample collection activity; In addition, EPA shall have the
right to collect any additional samples that EPA deems necessary.
'
D. Respondent shall enstre that the laboratory utilized by
Respondent for analyses participates in a EPA quality
assurance/quality control program equivalent to that which is
followed by EPA and which is consistent with EPA document
QAMS-005/80. In addition, EPA may require submittal of data
packages equivalent to those generated in the EPA Contract
Laboratory Program (CLP) and may require laboratory analysis of
performance samples (blank and/or spike samples) in sufficient
number to determine the capabilities of the laboratory.
i
E. Notwithstanding any provision of this Consent Order, the
EPA hereby retains all of its
1
information gathering, inspection
and enforcement authorities and rights under CERCLA, RCRA, and
any other applicable statute or regulation.
I
' XI.' ACCESS
A. From the date of exeJution of this Consent Order until
EPA provides written notice of satisfaction of the terms of the
Order, the EPA and its author~zed representatives and agents
shall have access at all times to the Site and any property to ! '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
12
which access is required forlthe implementation of this Consent
Order, to the extent access to the property is controlled by or
available to Respondent, forlthe purposes of conducting any
activity authorized by or rel!ated to this Consent Order,
including, but not limited to:
I
1. Monitoring the :RI/FS work or any other activities
taking place on the property ;I
2. Verifying any data or information submitted to the
United States; 1
I
I
3. Conducting inve·stigations relating to contamination
at or near the Site; 1
' 4. Obtaining sampl,es;
I
' 5. Evaluating the need for or planning and
implementing additional remed~al or response actions at or near
the Site; and
I
6. Inspecting and copying records, operating logs,
contracts, or·other documentsi required to assess Respondent's
compliance with this Consent Order.
' I B. To the extent that the Site or any other area where work
is to be performed under this\Consent Order is owned or
controlled by persons other than Respondent, Respondent shall I secure from such persons access for Respondent, as well as for
EPA and authorized representarives or agents of EPA, as necessary
to effectuate this Consent Order. Copies of such access
agreements will be provided to EPA prior to Respondent's
initiation of field activities. If access is not obtained within
thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Consent Order,
Respondent shall promptly nottfy the EPA. The United States may
thereafter assist Respondent in obtaining access. Respondent
shall, in accordance with Section XVII herein, reimburse the
United States for all costs incurred by it in obtaining access,
including but not limited to, 1attorneys' fees and the amount of
just compensation and costs incurred by the United States in
obtaining access. :
I
C. Notwithstanding any provision of this Consent Order, the
EPA retains all of its access iauthorities and rights under
CERCLA, RCRA and any other applicable statute or regulations.
I
XII. CONFIDENTIALITY OF SUBMISSIONS
' I A. Respondent may assert a confidentiality claim, if
appropriate, covering part or
1
all of the information requested by
this Consent Order pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 2.203(b). Such an
assertion will be adequately substantiated when the assertion is
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
13
made. Analytical data will riot be claimed as confidential by
Respondent. Information determined to be confidential by EPA
will be afforded the protect~on specified in 40 C.F.R. Part 2,
Subpart B. .If no such· claim 'accompanies the information when it
is submitted to EPA, it may b'e made available to the public by
EPA without further notice td Respondent.
B. Respondent waives any objection to the admissibility
into evidence (without waiving any objection as to weight) of the
results of any analyses of sampling conducted by or for them at
the Site or of other data gathered pursuant to this Consent Order
that has been verified by thel quality assurance/quality control
procedures established pursuant to Section x.
I
XIII. RECORD PRESERVATION
I
EPA and Respondent agree thatleach will preserve, during the
pendency of this Consent Order and for a minimum of six (6) years
after its termination, all records and documents in their
possession or in the possession of their divisions, employees,
agents, accountants, contractors, or attorneys which relate in
any way to the Site, despite any document retention policy to the
contrary. After this six year period, Respondent will notify EPA
within ninety (90) calendar days prior to the destruction of any
such documents. Upon requestlby EPA, Respondent will make
available to EPA such records,or copies of any such records,
Additionally, if EPA requestslthat documents be preserved for a
longer period of time, Respon9ent will comply with that request.
XIV. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
I
Any disputes arising under this Consent Order shall be resolved
as follows: If the Respondent objects to any EPA notice of
disapproval or decision made pursuant to this Consent Order, the
Respondent shall notify EPA's iProject Coordinator in writing of
its objections within 14 calendar days after receipt of the
decision. Respondent's written objections shall define the
dispute, state the basis of Respondent's objections, and be sent
certified mail, return receipt requested. EPA and the Respondent
then have an additional fourteen (14) calendar days to reach
agreement. If agreement cann~t be reached within fourteen (14)
calendar day period, the EPA Waste Management Division Director
shall provide a written statement of the decision and the reasons
supporting that decision to Re'spondent. The Division Director's
determination is EPA's final ct'ecision. If Respondent does agree
to perform or does not actuall¥ perform the task in dispute as
determined by EPA's Division D'irector, EPA reserves the right to
conduct the work itself, to seek reimbursement from the
Respondent, and/or to seek other appropriate relief.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '·
~
I I 14
. I Respondent is not relieved of its obligations to perform _and
conduct any work required byithis Consent Order while a matter is
pending in dispute resolution.
' XV, FORCE MAJEURE
I
A. "Force Majeure" is defined for the purposes of the
Consent Order as an event ar~sing from causes entirely beyond
the control of Respondent and of any entity controlled by
Respondent including, its cont'.ractors and subcontractors, · which
could not have been overcome by due diligence which delays or
prevents the performance of any obligation under this Consent
Order. Examples of events wh~ich may constitute force majeure.
events include extraordinary weather events, natural disasters,
and national emergencies. Examples of events that are not force
majeure events include, but are not limited to, normal inclement
weather, increased costs or expenses of the Work to be performed
under this Consent Order, thel financial difficulty of Respondent
to perform such tasks, the failure of one or more of Respondent
to satisfy their obligationuhder this Consent Order, acts or
omissions not otherwise force1 majeure attributable to
Respondent's contractors or·representatives, and the failure of
Respondent or Respondent's cohtractors or representatives to make
complete and timely application for any required approval or
permit. i
I
. B. When circumstances otcur which may delay or prevent the
completion of any phase of the Work Plan or access to the Site or
to any property on which part1of the Work Plan is to be
performed, whether or not caused by a force maieure event,
Respondent shall notify the EPA Project Coordinator orally of the
circumstances within forty-eight (48) hours of when Respondent
first knew or should have known that the event might cause delay.
If the EPA Project Coordinator is unavailable, Respondent shall
notify the designated alternate or the Director of the Waste
Management Division, EPA Region IV. Within seven (7) calendar
days after Respondent first became aware of such circumstances,
Respondent shall supply to EPA in writing: (1) the reasons for
the delay; (2) the anticipated duration of the delay; (3) all
actions taken or to be taken to prevent or minimize the delay;
(4) a schedule for implementation of any measures to be taken to
mitigate the effect of the de]ay; and (5) a statement as to
whether, in the opinion of the Respo"ndent, such event may cause
or contribute to an endangerment to public health, welfare, or
the environment. Respondent shall exercise best efforts to avoid
or minimize any delay and any !effects of a delay. Failure to
comply with the above requirements shall preclude Respondent from
asserting any claim of force ~ajeure.
I
C. If EPA agrees that a delay is or was caused by a force
majeure event, the time for pe~rformance of the obligations under
this Consent Order that are di-rectly affected by the force
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
L
1
15
majeure event shall be extended by agreement of the parties,
pursuant to Section XXIII, for a period of time not to exceed the
actual duration of the delay caused by the force majeure event.
An extension of the time for performance of the obligation
directly affected by the force majeure event shall not
necessarily justify an extension of time for'performance of any
subsequent obligation.
I D. If EPA does not agree that the delay or anticipated
delay has been or will be caused by a force majeure event, or
does not agree with Respondent on the length of the extension,
the issue shall be subject to\the dispute resolution procedures
set forth in Section XIV of the Consent Order. In any such
proceedings, to qualify for a!force majeure defense, Respondent
shall have the burden of proof that the delay or anticipated
delay was or will,be caused by a force majeure event, that the
duration of the delay was or will be warranted under the
circumstances, that best efforts were exercised to avoid and
mitigate the effects of the delay, and that Respondent complied
with the requirements of paragraph B of this Section. Should
Respondent carry this burden, i the delay at issue shall be deemed
not to be a violation by Respondent of the affected obligation of
the Consent Order.
' XVI. STIPULATED PENALTIES
Unless excused under the provisions of Sections XIV or xv, the
Respondent shall pay into the !Hazardous Substance Superfund
administered by EPA, the sums 'set forth below as stipulated
penalties.
Stipulated penalties shall accrue as follows:
'
A. For each day during Jhich Respondent fails to perform,
in accordance with the scheduies contained in this Consent Order
and in the various plans and reports required under this Consent
Order incorporated by referenc;e herein, any of the following
activities:
I
1. for failure to tiimely submit the RI/FS Work Plan,
Sampling and Analysis Plan, draft RI Report and draft FS Report
required under this Consent Order;
2. for failure to tlimely submit any modifications
requested by EPA or its repres'entatives to the RI/FS Work Plan,
Sampling and Analysis Plan, dr\i.ft RI Report and draft FS Report
as required under thiff Consent: Order; and ··
I
3. for failure to timely submit payment of oversight
costs as provided in Section XVII.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
16
Respondent shall be liable to.EPA for stipulated penalties in the
following amounts:
Period of Failure to Comply
1st through 14th day
15th through 44th day
45th day and beyond
Penalty Per Violation Per Day
$1,500
$2,500
$5,000
B. If Respondent fail to submit a monthly progress report
by its due date, Respondent s~all be liable to EPA for stipulated
penalties in the amount of $500 per violation for each day during
which Respondents fail to submit and, if necessary, modify
monthly reports. '
' ' C. Respondent shall be liable to EPA for stipulated
penalties in the amount of $500 per violation for each day during
which Respondent fail to compiy with all other requirements of
this Consent Order including, lbut not limited to, any
implementation schedule, paym~nt requirement, notification
requirement or completion deadline.
I
' 1 , I All stipulated penalties begi~ to accrue on the day the violation
occurs or on the day following Respondent's failure to comply
with any schedule or deadline !or the terms, conditions, or
requirements contained in this Consent Order and/or Work Plan.
Stipulated penalties shall coritinue to accrue until
Respondent's violation ends or until Respondent comply with the
particular schedule or deadlirie.
'
Payment of stipulated penalti~s shall be due and owing within
fifteen (ls)· days from the receipt of a written notice from EPA
notifying Respondent that pench ties have been assessed. Interest
shall accrue on any unpaid amounts, beginning at the end of the
fifteen day period, at the rat;e established by the Department of
Treasury under 31 U.S.C. § 371•7. Respondent shall pay a handling
charge of one percent to be as'sessed at the end of each 31 day
period, and a six percent per annum penalty charge, to be
assessed if the penalty is not! paid in full within 90 days after
it is due. The check and tran~mitted letter shall identify the
Name of the Site, the Site identification number and the title of
this Order. A copy of the transmittal letter should be sent
simultaneously to the EPA Project Coordinator.
I ' Payment shall be made to:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV
Superfund Accounting,
P. o. Box 100142 I
Atlanta, Georgia 30384
ATTENTION: (Collection Officer for Superfund)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
17
Respondent may dispute EPA's ~ight to the stated amount of
penalties by invoking the Dispute Resolution procedures under
Section XIV of this Order. Penalties shall accrue but need not
be paid during the dispute re~olution period. If Respondent does
not prevail upon resolution, .all penalties shall be due to EPA
within 30 days of resolution of the dispute. If Respondent
p·revails upon resolution, no penalties shall be paid.
I .
In the event that EPA provides for corrections to be reflected in
the next deliverable and does!not require resubmission of that
deliverable, stipulated penalties for that interim deliverable
shall cease to accrue on the date of such decision by EPA.
. ' I
Nothing herein shall prevent the simultaneous accrual of separate
penalties for separate violations of this Consent Order.
The stipulated penalties set ~orth in this Section do not
preclude EPA from electing to ,pursue any other remedies or
sanctions which may be availaJ::?le to EPA by reason of the
Respondent's failure to compl~ with any of the requirements of
this Consent Order. Such remedies and sanctions may include a
suit for statutory penalties Jp to the amount authorized by law,
a federally-funded response action, and a suit for reimbursement
of costs incurred by the United States.
I XVII. REIMBURSEMENT OF OVERSIGHT AND RESPONSE COSTS
I ' In accordance with Section 1041(a) (1) of CERCLA, as amended,
42 U.S.C. § 9604(a) (1), Respondent agrees to reimburse the
Hazard.ous Substance Superfund !for all response and oversight
costs incurred by EPA or its aµthorized representatives in
oversight of Respondent's performance of work under the Consent
I Order.
I
At the end of each fiscal year:, EPA will submit to Respondent an
accounting of all response and'. oversight costs incurred by the
U.S. Government with respect tb this Consent Order. Oversight
costs shall include all direct'. and indirect costs of EPA's
oversight arrangement for the RI/FS, including, but not limited
to, time and travel costs of EPA personnel and associated
indirect costs, contractor costs, compliance monitoring,
including the collection and ahalysis of split samples,
inspection of RI/FS activities; site visits, interpretation of
Consent Order provisions, discussions regarding disputes that may
arise as a result of this Consent Order, review and approval or
disapproval of reports, the costs of redoing any of Respondent
tasks, and any assessed interest.
'
EPA's certified Agency Financi~l Management System Summary data
(SPUR Reports) and any other necessary documents, shall serve as
the basis for payment demands.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
18
I
' Failure to submit an accounting in one fiscal year does not
prevent EPA from submitting an accounting for that year in a
subsequent fiscal year·. Respondent shall, within thirty ( 30)
calendar days of receipt of each accounting, remit a certified or
cashiers check for the amount of those costs made payable to the
Hazardous Substance Superfund. Interest shall begin to accrue on
the unpaid balance from that !date. Checks should specifically
reference the identity of the Site and should be sent to:
U. S. Environmental !Protection
Region IV
d ' I Superfun Accounting,
P. 0. Box 100142
Atlanta, Georgia 30·384
ATTENTION: Collection Officer
Agency
for Superfund
A copy of the transmittal let'ter should be sent simultaneously to
the EPA Project Coordinator. 1
Respondent agrees to limit any disputes concerning costs to
accounting errors and the inclusion of costs outside the scope of
this Consent Order. Respondent shall identify any contested
costs and the basis of its obJection. All undisputed costs shall
be remitted by Respondent in ~ccordance with the schedule set out
above. Disputed costs shall be paid by Respondent into an escrow
account while the dispute is pending. Respondent bears the
burden of establishing an EPAiaccounting error and the inclusion
of costs outside the scope of:this Consent Order.
I
EPA reserves the right to bribg an action against the Respondent
pursuant to Section 107 of CERCLA to enforce the response and
oversight cost reimbursement requirements of this Consent Order
and to collect stipulated penalties assessed pursuant to section
XVI of this Consent Order. 1
XVIII. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
I
Notwithstanding compliance with the terms of this Consent Order,
the Respondent is not released from liability, if any, for any
actions beyond the terms of tnis Consent Order taken by EPA
regarding this Site. EPA reserves the right to take any
enforcement action pursuant to CERCLA or any other available
legal authority, including the right to seek injunctive relief,
monetary penalties, and punit~ve damages for any violation of law
or this Consent Order. ·
Except as otherwise provided herein, EPA and Respondent expressly
reserve all rights and defens~s that they may have, including
EPA's right both to disapprov~ of work performed by Respondent
and to require that Respondent perform.tasks in addition to those
detailed in the RI/FS Work Pla'n, as provided in this Consent
Order. In the event that Respondent declines to perform any
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r--
'\I ,,. ' ;
19
additional or modified tasks) EPA will have the right ·to
undertake any RI/FS work. In addition, EPA reserves the right to
undertake removal actions and/or remedial actions at any time.
In either event, EPA reserves the right to seek reimbursement
from Respondent thereafter for such costs which are incurred by
the United States and Respondent reserves all rights to contest
or defend against such claims or actions.
Following satisfaction of thJ requirements of this Consent Order,
Respondent shall have resolved its liability to EPA for the
performance of the RI/FS that is the subject of this Order. The
Respondent is not released f~om liability, if any, for any
actions taken beyond the terms of this Order regarding removals,
other operable units, remedial design/remedial action (RD/RA), or
activities arising pursuant t'o section 12l(c) of CERCLA.
I
XIX. IOTHER CLAIMS
Nothing in this Consent Orde~ constitutes a release from any
claim, cause of action or demand in law or equity against any
person, firm, partnership; ori corporation for any liability it
may have arising out of or re•lating in any way to the generation,
storage, treatment, handling,
1
transportation, release, or
disposal of any hazardous substances, hazardous wastes,
pollutants, or contaminants found at, taken to, or taken from the
Site. I
EPA reserves the {ight to bri~g an action against the Respondent
pursuant to Section 107 of CEfCLA for recovery of all response
and oversight costs incurred by the United States related to this
Consent Order and not reimbursed by Respondent, as well as any
other past and future costs incurred by the United States in
connection with response activities conducted pursuant to CERCLA
at this site. '
This Consent Order does not constitute a pre-authorization of
funds under Section lll(a) (2) ;of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9611(a) (2).
I
In entering into this Consent1Order, Respondent waives any right
to seek reimbursement under Section 106 (b) (2) of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C. § 9606(b) (2), for any past costs associated with this
Site, or any costs incurred i~ complying with this Order.
Respondent shall bear its own;costs and attorney fees.
I
XX. OTHERI APPLICABLE LAWS
All actions required to be tak'en pursuant to this Consent Order
will be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of all
applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations unless
an exemption from such requirements is specifically provided in
this Consent Order, or made a ipart of this Consent Order by being
incorporated herein at some later date. ·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
' ' -·-·1
I
20
I XXI. INDEMNIFICATION OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Respondent agree to indemnifJ and save and hold harmless the
United States, its agencies, 1departments, officials, agents,
employees, contractors, or rJpresentative, from any and all
claims or causes .of action arising from or on account of acts or
omissions of Respondent its officers, employees, receivers,
trustees, agents, or assigns,1 in carrying out the activities
pursuant to this Consent Order. The United States Government or
any agency or authorized representative thereof shall not be held
to be a party to any contract involving Respondent at or relating
to the Site.
XXII. ,PUBLIC COMMENT
! Upon submittal to EPA of the :Feasibility Study Final Report, EPA
will make both the Remedial Investigation Final Report and the
Feasibility Study Final Repol'.'t and EPA's Proposed Plan available
to the public for review and ;comment for, at a minimum, a thirty
(30) day period, pursuant to EPA's Community Relations Plan and
the NCP. Following the publi'c review and comment period, EPA
will notify Respondent of thel remedial action alternative
selected for the Site.
XXIII. EFFECTIVE DATE AND SUBSEQUENT MODIFICATION
I
In consideration of the communications between Respondent and EPA
prior to the issuance of thisi Consent Order concerning its terms,
Respondent agrees that there is no need for a settlement
conference prior to the effective date of this Consent Order.
Therefore, the effective datelof this Consent Order will be the
date on which it is signed by,EPA. This Consent Order may be
amended by mutual agreement of EPA and Respondent. Such
amendments will be in writing 1 and will have, as the effective
date, that date on which suchjamendments are signed by EPA. EPA
Project Coordinators do not have the authority to sign amendments
to the Consent Order.
' Any reports, plans, specifications, schedules, and attachments
required by this Consent Order are, upon approval by EPA,
incorporated into this Consent Order. Any noncompliance with
such EPA approved reports, plans, specifications, schedules, and
attachments will be considered a failure to achieve the
requirements of this Consent 0rder and will subject the
Respondent to the provisions included in the "Force Majeure" and
"Stipulated Penalties" sections (Sections xv and XVI) of this
Consent Order. '
No informal advice, guidance, : suggestions, or comments by EPA
regarding reports, plans, specifications, schedules, and any
other writing submitted by Respondent will be construed as
relieving Respondent of its obligation to obtain such formal
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
'
21
approval of EPA as may be required by this Consent Order.
XXIV. NOTICE TO THE STATE
EPA has notified the State of North Carolina regarding the
requirements of this ConsentlOrder. ·
Upon completion of the RI/FS! pursuant to the requirements of
Section 104 (c) (2) of CERCLA,, 42 U.S.C. § 9604 (c) (2), EPA will
notify the State of North Carolina before determining the
appropriate remedial action to be taken at the Site.
'
XXV. TERMINATION AND SATISFACTION
'' This Consent Order shall teril)inate when the Respondent
demonstrates in writing and certifies to the satisfaction of EPA
that all activities requiredlunder this Consent Order, including
' ' ' any additional work, payment ,of past costs, response and
oversight costs, and any stipulated penalties demanded by EPA,
have been performed and EPA has approved the certification. This
notice shall not, however, terminate Respondent's obligation to
comply with Sections XIII, XViII, and XVIII of this Consent Order.
The certification shall be signed by a responsible official
representing each Respondent.' Each representative shall make the
following attestation: "I certify that the information contained
in or accompanying this certffication is true, accurate, and
·complete." For purposes of ·this Consent Order, a responsible
official is a corporate official who is in charge of a principal
business function.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
22
IT IS SO AGREED:
BY:
(Respondent)
(Title)
IT IS SO AGREED AND ORDERED:
BY:
' I
Richard D. Green
Acting Director ,
Waste Management Division
Region IV I
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency !
Date
Date
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1
I
I
SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
AT THE DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SUPERFUND SITE
I
INTRODUCTION
I
The primary objectives of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Study are to investigate the\nature and extent of all ·
contamination associated with the Davis Park Road TCE (the Site),
assess the current and potential risk to public health, welfare,
and the environment, to gather sufficient data to support a and
to develop and evaluate potential Remedial Action Alternatives
for the Remedial Action at ttie Site. The Remedial Investigation
(RI), and Feasibility Study (:Fs) are interactive and shall be
conducted concurrently so that the data collected in the RI
influences the development of Remedial Action Alternatives in the
FS, which in turn affects the'. data needs and the scope of
Treatability Studies needed for implementation of the Remedial
Action. I
I I
Respondent shall conduct the RI/FS, the Baseline Risk Assessment,
and produce an RI and an FS Report that are in accordance with
this Scope of Work, the Guidance for Conducting Remedial
Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA, /Interim
Final) (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response, October 1988) (RI/FS Guidance),
the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan (March 8, 1990), and other guidance used by EPA in
conducting an RI/FS (the primary sources of guidance are listed
in Attachment A), as well as any additional requirements in the
Administrative Order on Consent (AOC). The RI/FS Guidance
describes the report formats and the required report content.
Pertinent RI/FS Guidance section numbers are denoted in
parenthesis throughout this sbope of Work. Respondent shall
furnish all necessary personn~l, materials, and services needed,
or incidental to, performing the RI/FS, except as otherwise
specified in the AOC. I
I
At the completion of the RI/FS, EPA shall be responsible for the
selection of a remedy to be implemented for the Site. EPA will
document this selection. of a remedy in the Record of Decision
(ROD). I
I
I
Section 121 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 u.s.c. § 9621, as
amended by the Superfund Amendment Reauthorization Act of 1986
(SARA), P.L. 99-499, requiresithat the remedial alternative
selected for the Site will be
1
protective of human health and the
environment, will be cost-effective, will utilize permanent
solutions and alternative treatment technologies or resource
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
recovery technologies to the maximum extent practicable, will be
in compliance with, or include a waiver of, applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements,of other laws or
regulations, and will address the statutory preference for
on-site treatment which permahently arid significantly reduces the
volume, toxicity, or mobility1of the hazardous substances,
pollutants, and contaminants ~s a principal element. The Final
RI/FS Reports, as adopted by EPA, and Baseline Risk Assessment
will, with the remainder of the Administrative Record, form the
basis for the selection of the remedy to be implemented for the
Site and will provide the information necessary to support the
I development of the ROD.
As specified in CERCLA Section 104(a)(l), 42 U.S.C. § 9604(a) (1),
EPA must provide oversight of\Respondent's activities throughout
the RI/FS. Respondent shall support EPA's initiation and conduct
of activities related to the implementation of oversight
activities. However, the primary responsibility for conducting
an adequate RI/FS,' in order to enable EPA to select and suppor,t a
remedy shall lie with Respondent. EPA review and approval of
deliverables is a tool to assist this process and to _satisfy, in
part, EPA's responsibility to1provide effective protection of
public health, welfare, and the environment. EPA·approval of a
task or deliverable shall not[be a guarantee as to the.ultimate
adequacy of such task or deliverable. A summary of the major
deliverables that Respondent shall submit for the RI/FS is
attached (Attachment B). In addition, a general schedule of
RI/FS activities is also attached (Attachment C).
I TASK 1 -SCOPING (RI/FS Guidill!-ce, Chapter 2)
Scoping is the ·initial plannirtg process of the RI/FS and has been
initiated by EPA to determine jthe site-specific objectives of the
RI/FS prior to negotiations between Respondent and EPA. Scoping
is continued, repeated as necessary, and refined throughout the
RI/FS process. In addition to developing the Site Objectives of
the RI/FS, EPA has developed~ Site Management Strategy.
Consistent with the Site Management Strategy, the specific
project scope shall be planned by Respondent and EPA. Respondent
shall document the specific pioject scope in a Work Plan.
Because the work required to perform an RI/FS is not fully known
at the onset, and is phased iri accordance with a Site's
complexity and the amount of available information, it may be
necessary to modify the Work p',lan and associated time schedules
during the RI/FS to satisfy th'e objectives of the study.
The primary objectives for con~uctirig the RI/FS at the Site have
been determined preliminarily,! based on available information, to
be the following:
1. Review of existing informi'ltion pertaining to the Site. This
review includes EPA Site Inspection Reports, the EPA
Hazardous Ranking Scoring'. System, reports from local, State
and Federal agencies, court records, information from local '
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
-3-
businesses such as local well drillers and waste haulers and
generators, facility reqords, and information from facility
owners and employees and nearby citizens.
Review of relevant guiddnce (see attached references) to
understand the SACM app~oach to conducting an· RI/FS, and how
SACM fits into the remedial process. This information shall
be used in performing the RI/FS and preparing all
deliverables under this ·sow.
I ' Identification of all Fe'deral and State applicable or
relevant and appropriat~ requirements (ARARs). EPA may
assist Respondent in obt1aining the State ARARs: ' I
Determination of the nature and lateral and vertical extent
of contamination (waste types, concentrations and
distributions) for all affected media including air, ground
water, soil, surface wat~r, and sediment, etc.
Performance of a well survey within a three mile radius of
the Site including determining water uses, well construction
methods used, the numberland age of users, and the volume
and rate of water usage.,
' I
Identification and screening of potential treatment
technologies along with ~ontainment/disposal requirements
for residuals or untreated wastes. '
Assembly of technologies!into Remedial Action Alternatives,
followed by screening oflthose alternatives.
I
Performance of bench or pilot Treatability Studies as
necessary.
I Detailed analysis of those Remedial Action Alternatives
which survive the screening process.
I The Site Management Strategy for the Site includes the following:
1. A complete investigation'.of the Davis Park Road TCE,
including any and all on~site contamination, as well as any
and all off-site contami~ation which may have been caused by
contaminants originating 1from on-site source area(s).
' .
2 • ' Use of the RI to identify any other Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs) that may ~e involved. Additional PRPs shall
be identified during the RI if additional PRPs exist. EPA
will make all determinat:ilons on potential EPA enforcement
actions; providing, however, that nothing in this paragraph
shall preclude Respondent! from asserting any claim, or ·
defense, against any pers'on in any appropriate forum without
prior approval of EPA, or'. proceeding against any PRP that is
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.
4.
5.
6.
-4-
not identified, or doesinot equitably participate in this
matter.
i
It is anticipated at this time that one ROD will be prepared
for the Site, involving lone Superfund cleanup.
No interim remedial measures are anticipated for the Site at
this point in time, 1 ·
I
-i EPA oversight of the Respondent's conduct of the work (i.e.,
the RI/FS, and any response action) to .ensure compliance
with applicable laws, regulations and guidance and to ensure
that the work proceeds in a timely fashion.
I
Respondent shall prepare the Baseline Risk Assessment.
Respondent shall provide requested information, including
sampling data, to EPA and/or EPA's contractors in a timely
manner, according to a schedule to be provided to the
performing party. The Baseline Risk Assessment shall
include: '
Data Evaluation
I Exposure Assessment a'nd Documentation
Determination of Actu'al and Potential Pathways and
Receptors
Toxicity Assessment and Documentation
'
Ecological Assessment!
Risk Characterization; including * Carcinogenic Risks * Noncarcinogenic Risks * Environmental Risks to Flora and Fauna I
7. EPA management of the Remedy Selection and Record
phase with input from State Agencies, Natural
and the Public (including Respondent).
of
Resource Decision
Trustees
I
I
When scoping the specific aspects of a project, Respondent shall
meet with EPA to discuss all project planning decisions and
special concerns associated with the Site. The following
activities shall be performed'by Respondent as a function of the
project planning process. 1
a. Site Background (2.2)
Respondent shall gather and artalyze the existing background
information regarding the Site and shall conduct a visit to
Site to assist in planning the scope of the RI/FS.
the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
b.
-s-
Collect and Analyze Exis1ting Data and Document the Need for
Additional Data (2.2.2; 2.2.6; 2.2.7)
I
Before planning RI/FS activities, all existing Site data
shall be thoroughly compiled and·reviewed by Respondent.
Specifically, this compiiation and review shall include
currently available datal relating to the varieties and
quantities of hazardous substances at the Site and past
disposal practices. (what! type of contaminants were disposed
where, when, and by whom-) •. This compilation and review
shall also include results from any previous sampling or
other investigations that may have been conducted.
Respondent shall refer to Table 2-1 of the RI/FS Guidance
for a comprehensive list! of data collection information
sources. This information shall be utilized in determining
additional data needed for Site Characterization, better
defining potential applicable or relevant and appropriate
requirements (ARARs), and developing a range of
preliminarily identified'IRemedial Action Alternatives •.
Subject to EPA approval,,Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)
shall be established that specify the usefulness of existing
data. Decisions on the necessary data and DQOs shall be
made by EPA.
Conduct Site Visit
Respondent shall conduct!a visit to the Site with the EPA
Remedial Project Manager
1
(RPM), an EPA Site Assessmen~
Manager (SAM) (or State counterpart), and EPA's oversight
contractor during the project scoping phase to assist in
developing a conceptual understanding of the sources and
areas of contamination a~ well as potential exposure
pathways and receptors at the Site. During the visit to the
Site, Respondent shall observe the physiography, hydrology,
geology, and demographics of the Site as well as related
natural resource, ecological and cultural features. This
information shall be utilized to better scope the project
and to determine the need for additional data necessary to
characterize the Site, better define potential ARARs, and
narrow the range of preliminarily identified remedial action
alternatives.
Project Planning (2.2)
Once Respondent has collectedjand analyzed existing data and
conducted a visit to the Site, the specific project scope shall
be planned. Project planningiactivities include those tasks
described below as well as the development-of specific required
deliverables as described in paragraph c. Respondent shall meet
with EPA regarding the following activities and before the
drafting of the scoping delivJrables.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
1
I
I
I
I
I
c.
-6-
I
Refine the Site Objectives and Develop Preliminary Remedial
Action Objectives and Alternatives (2.2.3)
i
Once existing information about the Site has been analyzed
and a conceptual understanding of the potential risks posed
by the Site has been obtained, Respondent shall review and,
if necessary, refine the Site Objectives and develop
preliminary remedial action objectives for each of the media
known or suspected to be contaminated. Any revised Site
Objectives shall be documented by Respondent in a technical
memorandum, and are subject to EPA approval prior to
development of the other scoping deliverables.
I Respondent shall then identify a preliminary range of
broadly defined potential Remedial Action Alternatives and
associated technologies; The range of potential
alternatives shall include, at a minimum, alternatives in
which treatment is used\to reduce the toxicity, mobility, or
volume of the waste, but varying in the types of treatment,
the amount treated, andlthe manner in which long-term
residuals or untreated wastes are managed; alternatives that
involve containment andltreatment components; alternatives
that involve containment with little or no treatment; and a
no-action alternative. I
I
Document the Need for TJeatability Studies (2.2.4)
If remedial actions invdlving treatment have been identified
by Respondent or EPA, Treatability Studies shall be required
except where Respondent lean demonstrate.to EPA's
satisfaction that they are not needed. Where Treatability
Studies are needed, idedtification of possible technologies
and screening shall be done and the results submitted with
the RI/FS ·work Plan. _ In,itial Treatability Study activities
(such as research and study design) shall be planned to
occur concurrently with 'site Characterization activities
( see Tasks 3 and 4 ) • I
I
I Begin Preliminary Identification of Potential ARARs. (2.2.5)
I I Respondent shall conduct, a preliminary identification of
potential state and Federal ARARs (chemical-specific,
location-specific, and action-specific) to assist in the
refinement of remedial abtion objectives and the initial
identification of Remedikl Action Alternatives and ARARs
associated with particulkr actions. ARAR identification
shall continue as conditions and contaminants at the Site
and Remedial Action Alternatives are better defined.
'
Scoping Deliverables (2.3)
At the conclusion of the project planning phase, Respondent shall
I
I
I
I.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-7-
submit a RI/FS .Work Plan, a S,ampling and Analysis Plan, and a
Health and Safety Plan. The RI/FS Work Plan and Sampling and
Analysis Plan must be reviewed and approved .and the Health and
Safety Plan reviewed by EPA prior to the initiation of field
activities. ·
RI/FS Work Plan (2,3.1) '
I
A Work Plan documenting the decisions and evaluations
completed during the scoping process shall be submitted to
EPA for review and approval. The Work Plan shall be
developed in conjunction!with the Sampling and Analysis
Plan and the Health and ~afety Plan, although each plan may
be delivered under separate cover. The Work Plan shall
include a comprehensive description of the work to be
performed, the medias to1 be investigated (i.e., Air, Ground
Water, Surface Water, Surface and Subsurface Soils, and
Sediments, etc.), the methodologies to be utilized, and the
rationale for the selection of each methodology. A
comprehensive schedule for completion of each major activity
and submission of each deliverable shall also be included.
This schedule shall be consistent with Attachment C.
I
Specifically, the Work Plan shall present the following:
- A statement of the problem(s) and potential problem(s)
posed by the Site and the objectives of the RI/FS.
- A background summary setting forth the following:
'
- a description of the Site including the geographic
location, and, to the extent possible, a description of
the physiography, hydrology, geology, demographics, and
the ecological, cultural, and natural resource features
of the Site; ' ·
- a synopsis of the !history of the Site including a
summary of past disposal practices and a description of
previous responses that have been conducted by local,
State, Federal, or private parties at the Site;
I .
' - a summary of the existing data in terms of physical
and chemical characteristics of the contaminants
identified and their distribution among the
environmental media 'at the Site.
- a description of the likelihood of Site-related
contaminants being released from.the Site and effecting
neighboring populati1on, environmental condition, or
endangered species. i This description will be conducted
for the groundwater, surface water, soil, and air
exposure pathways. ·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-8-
I - A description of the Site Management Strategy developed by
EPA during scoping as discussed previously in this SOW and
as may be modified with'.EPA's approval;
. I
-A preliminary identification of Remedial Action
Alternatives and data needs for evaluation of Remedial
Action Alternatives. This preliminary identification shall
reflect coordination with Treatability Study requirements
(see Tasks 1 and 4). '
• • ·I• - A process for identifying Federal and State ARARs
(chemical-specific, location-specific, and action-specific).
I
- A detaiied description of the tasks to be performed,
information needed for each task, information to be produced
during and at the conclusion of each task, and a description
of the work products that shall be submitted to EPA. This.
description must also include the deliverables set forth in
the remainder of this Scope of Work.
I
I
- A schedule for each of. the required activities which is
consistent with Attachment C, as it may be amended or
modified in accordance with the Superfund Accelerated
Cleanup Model ("SACM"), and the RI/FS Guidance;
- A project management plan, including a data management
plan (e.g., requirements! for project management systems and
software, minimum data requirements, data format, and backup
data management), monthly reports to EPA (the frequency of
these reports may be altered, upon the prior written consent
of EPA), and meetings and presentations to EPA at the .
conclusion of each majori phase of the RI/FS.
I
I • Respondent shall refer to Appendix B of the RI/FS Guidance
for a comprehensive description of the contents of the
required Work Plan.
Because of the unknown nature of the Site and iterative
nature of the RI/FS, additional data requirements may be
identified throughout the RI/FS process. Respondent shall
submit a technical memorandum documenting any need for
additional data along with the proposed DQOs whenever such
requirements are identified, in writing, by EPA, or at
Respondent's election. In any event, Respondent is
responsible for fulfilling additional data and analysis
needs identified by EPA in writing consistent with the
general scope and objectives of this RI/FS and the
Administrative Order. ;
Sampling and Analysis Plan (2.3.2)
Respondent shall
I
I prepare ,a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
I
-9-
to ensure that sample collection and analytical activities
are conducted in accordance with technically acceptable
protocols and that the data generated will meet the DQOs
established. The SAP provides a mechanism for planning
field activities and consists of a Field Sampling and
Analysis Plan (FSAP) and a Quality Assurance Project Plan
(QAPP). I
The FSAP shall define inl detail the sampling and
data-gathering methods that shall be used on the project.
It shall include sampling objectives, sample location
(horizontal and vertical) and frequency, sampling equipment
and procedures, and sample handling and analysis. The QAPP
shall describe the project objectives and organization,
functional activities, and quality assurance.and quality
control (QA/QC) protocols that shall be used to achieve the
desired DQOs.; The DQOs will, at a minimum, reflect use of
analytical methods for identifying contamination and ·
addressing contamination\consistent with the levels for
remedial action objectives identified in the National
Contingency Plan, pages 8845 and 8849-8.853 (March 8, 1990).
In addition, the QAPP shall address personnel
qualifications, sampling \procedures, sample custody,
analytical procedures, and data reduction,.validation, and
reporting. These procedtires must be consistent with the
Region IV-Environmental Compliance Branch Standard Operating
Procedures and Quality As'surance Manual (February 1, 1991).
Field personnel shall be 'available for EPA QA/QC training
and orientation, as requi'red. .
Respondent shall demonstrate, in advance and to EPA's
satisfaction, that each laboratory it may use is qualified
to conduct the proposed work. This demonstration must
include use of methods and analytical protocols for the
chemicals of concern (typically the Target Compound List
(TCL) and the Target Analyte List (TAL)) in the media of
interest within detectionJand quantification limits
consistent with both QA/QC procedures and DQOs approved by
EPA in the QAPP for the Site. The laboratory must have and
follow an EPA-approved QA~QC program. Respondent shall
provide assurances that EPA has access to laboratory
personnel, equipment and records for sample collection,
transportation, and analysis. EPA may require that
Respondent submit detailed information to demonstrate that
the laboratory is qualifi~d to conduct the work, including
information on personnel qualifications, equipment, and
material specifications. 1In addition, EPA may require
submittal of data packages' equivalent ·to those generated in
the EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) and may require
laboratory analysis of performance samples (blank and/or
spike samples) in sufficient number to determine the
capabilities of the laboratory. If a laboratory not
' '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
n
I
-10-
currently participating 1 in the CLP is selected, methods
consistent with CLP methods that would be used at this Site
for the purposes proposed and QA/QC procedures approved by
EPA shall be used. ;
In addition, if the laboratory is not in the CLP program, a
laboratory QA program must be submitted for EPA review and
approval granted prior to the shipment of Site samples to
that laboratory for anal'ysis.
'
Health and Safety Plan (~.3.3)
I A Health and Safety Plan! shall be prepared in conformance
with Respondent's health\ and safety. program, and in
compliance with OSHA regulations and protocols. The Health
and Safety Plan shall include the eleven elements described
in the RI/FS ·Guidance, such as a health and safety risk
analysis, a description of monitoring and personal
protective equipment, medical monitoring, and site control.
It should be noted that EPA does not "approve" Respondent's
Health and Safety Plan, but rather EPA reviews it to ensure
that all necessary elements are included, and that the plan
provides for the protection of human health and the
environment.
' ' TASK 2 -COMMUNITY RELATIONS (·2.3.4).
The development and implementa'tion of community relations
activities are the responsibility of EPA. T.he critical community ·
relations planning steps performed by EPA include conducting
community interviews and developing a community relations plan.
EPA, or its Community Relations Coordinator, will use best
efforts to give reasonable notice to Respondent prior to
scheduling community relations :
1
. activities to which Respondent is
required to attend or preside. Although implementation of the
community relations plan is th~ responsibility of EPA, the
Respondent may be requested to:assist by providing information
regarding the history of the Site and participating in public
meetings. The extent of Respondent's involvement in community
relations activities is left to the discretion of EPA.
Respondent's community relations responsibilities, if any, shall
be specified in the community ~elations plan. All community·
relations activities conducted 1by Respondent shall be subject to
oversight by EPA.
' Respondent shall prepare three .or more Baseline Risk Assessment
memoranda which will summarize the toxicity assessment and human
and ecological exposure assessment components of the Baseline
Risk Assessment. EPA shall make these memoranda available to all
interested parties for comment hy placing them in the information
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
u
-11-
1
repository EPA has established for the Site and by placing them
in the Administrative Record! EPA, ·however, is not required to
formally respond to comments'.except during the formal comment
period which occurs after a Proposed Remedial Action Plan is . d ' issue. . : ·
TASK 3 -SITE CHARACTERIZATitjN (RI/FS Guidance, Chapter 3)
I
As part of the RI, Respondent shall perform the activities
described in this task, including the preparation of a Site
Characterization Summary and~ RI Report. The overall objective
of Site Characterization is t'o describe areas of the Site that
may pose a threat to human he~lth or the.environment. This
objective is accomplished by first determining physiography,
geology, and hydrology of the;site. Surface and subsurface
pathways of migration shall also be defined. Respondent shall
identify the sources of contamination and define the nature,·
extent, and volume of the sources of contamination, including
their physical 0 and chemical constituents as well as their
concentrations at incrementalllocations in the affected media.
Respondent shall also investigate the extent of migration of this
contamination as well as its volume and any changes in its
physical or chemical characteristics. This. investigation will
provide for a comprehensive understanding of the nature and
extent of contamination at thEi Site. · Using this information,
contaminant fate and transport shall be determined and projected.
During this phase of the RI/FS, the Work Plan, SAP, and Health
and Safety Plan shall be implemented. Field data shall be
collected and analyzed to prov\de the information required to
accomplish the objectives of the study. Respondent shall notify
EPA at least two weeks in advapce of the field work regarding the
planned dates for field activities, including installation of
monitoring wells, installation\and calibration of equipment, pump
tests, field lay out of any s~pling grid, excavation, sampling
and analysis activities, and other field investigation
activities. Respondent shall demonstrate that the laboratory and
type of laboratory analyses that will be utilized during Site
Characterization meets the specific QA/QC requirements and the
DQOs as specified in the SAP. ;In view of the unknown conditions
at the Site, activities are often iterative and, to satisfy the
objectives of the RI/FS, it may be necessary for Respondent to
supplement the work specified in the initial Work Plan. In
addition to the deliverables below, Respondent shall provide a
monthly progress report (the frequency of these reports may be
altered, upon the.prior written consent of EPA), and participate
in meetings with EPA at major p'oints in the RI/FS.
a. Field Investigation (3.2) .
The field investigation includes the gathering of data to define
physical characteristics, sources of contamination, and the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .. ..
I
I
I
I
I
0
u
-12-
I
nature and extent of contamin'ation at the Site. These activities
shall be performed by Respondent in accordance with the Work.Plan
and SAP. At a minimum, this 'investigation shall include the
following activities: I
'
Implementing and Documenting Field Support Activities
(3.2.1i I
I Respondent shall initiate field support activities following
approval of the Work Pla~ and SAP. Field support activities
may include obtaining access to the Site, property surveys,
scheduling, and procuring equipment, office space,
laboratory services, utility services and/or contractors.
Respondent shall notify EPA at least two weeks prior to
initiating field supportiactivities so that EPA may
adequately schedule oversight tasks. Respondent shall also
notify EPA in writing upon completion of field support
activities. \
Investigating and Definirig Site Physical and Biological
Characteristics ( 3. 2. 2) I
Respondent shall collect ~ata on the physical and biological
characteristics of the Si~e and its surrounding areas
including the physiography, geology, and hydrology, and
specific physical characteristics identified in the Work
Plan. This information shall be ascertained through a
combination of physical measurements, observations, and
sampling efforts and shall be utilized to define potential
transport pathways and receptor populations. In defining
the physical characteristics of the Site, Respondent shall
also obtain sufficient engineering data (such as pumping
characteristics, soil particle size, permeability, etc.) for
the projection of contaminant fate and transport and the
development and screening;of Remedial Action Alternatives,
including information necessary to evaluate treatment
technologies. ;
I Defining Sources of Contamination (3.2.3)
Respondent shall locate eJch source of contamination. For
each location, the later.a.JI and vertical extent of
contamination shall be determined by sampling at incremental
depths on a sampling grid 1or in another organized fashion
approved by EPA.
I . The physical characteristics and chemical constituents and
their concentrations shall\ be determined for all known and
discovered sources of contamination. Respondent shall
conduct sufficient sampling to define the boundaries of the
contaminant sources to thei level established in the QA/QC
plan and DQOs. On-site sources of contamination shall be
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
b.
-13-
analyzed for the potenti1al of contaminant release (e.g.,
long term leaching from '_soil into groundwater, runoff into
nearby surface water pathways, airborne transport to on-and
off-site locations), contaminant mobility and persistence,
and characteristics important for evaluating remedial
actions, including information necessary to evaluate
treatment technologies aµd to document the HRS Package for
Site inclusion on the Na~ional Priorities List (NPL).
Describing the Nature and Extent of Contamination (3.2.4)
I
I Respondent shall gather information to describe the nature
and extent of contamination as a final step during the field
investigation. To describe the nature and extent of
contamination, Respondent shall utilize the information on
Site physical characteri~tics and sources of contamination
to give a preliminary estimate of the contaminants that may
have migrated. Respondent shall then implement an iterative
monitoring program and any study program identified in the
Work Plan or SAP such that, by using analytical·techniques
sufficient to detect and quantify the concentration of
contaminants, the rnigratibn of contaminants through the
various media at the Sitei can be ·determined. In addition,
Respondent shall gather data for calculations of contaminant
fate and transport. This:process is continued until the
lateral and vertical extent of contamination has been
determined to the contaminant concentrations consistent with
the established DQOs set forth in the QAAP. EPA shall use
the information on the nature and' extent of contamination to
determine the level of risk presented by the Site and to
document the HRS Package for Site inclusion on the NPL.
Respondent shall use this 1information to help to determine
aspects of the appropriatJ Remedial Action Alternatives to
be evaluated. :
Data Analyses (3.4) 1
I
Evaluate Site Characteristics (3.4.1)
I
Respondent shall analyze and evaluate the data to describe:
(1) physical and biological characteristics of the Site; (2)
contaminant source characteristics; (3) nature and extent of
contamination; and (4) contaminant fate and transport. The
information on physical an9 biological characteristics,
source characteristics, and nature and extent of
contamination shall be used in the analysis of contaminant
fate and transport.
The evaluation shall include the actual and potential
magnitude of releases from ithe sources and lateral and
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
c.
-14-
vertical spread of contamination as well as mobility and
persistence of contaminants. Where modeling is appropriate,
such modeis shall be ide'ntified tci EPA in a technical
memorandum prior to their use. All dat.a and programming,
including any proprietary programs, shall be made available
to EPA together with a sensitivity analysis. All models
shall be approved by EPA:prior to their use. The RI data
shall be, presented in a computer disk format utilizing Lotus
1-2-3 or other equivalent commonly used computer software to
facilitate EPA's review of the Baseline Risk Assessment.
Respondent shall then coilect any data identified by EPA as
necessary to fill data gaps that· EPA determines are present
during preparation of the Baseline Risk Assessment (see
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment, U.S. EPA,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, October 1990,
OSWER Directive No. 9285.17-05). Also, this evaluation shall
provide any information relevant t_o characteristics of the
Site necessary for evaluation of the need for remedial
action identified in the ,Baseline Risk Assessment, the
development and evaluation of Remedial Action Alternatives,
and the refinement and identification of ARARs. Analyses of
data collected for Site Characterization shall meet the DQOs
developed in the QAPP.
Data Management Procedures (3.5)
I
Respondent shall consistently document the quality and validity
of field and laboratory data compiled during the RI. At a
minimum, this documentation shall include the following
activities:
Documenting Field Activities ( 3. 5 .• 1)
I
I
Information gathered during characterization of the Site
shall be consistently documented and adequately recorded by
Respondent in well maintained field logs and laboratory
reports. The method(s) of documentation must be specified
in the Work Plan and/or the SAP. Field logs must be
utilized to document observations, calibrations,
measurements, and signific'ant events that have occurred
during field activities. Laboratory reports must document
sample custody, analytical, responsibility, analytical
results, adherence to prescribed protocols, nonconformity
events, corrective measures, and/or data deficiencies.
Supporting documentation described as the "CLP Data Package"
must be provided with the sample analysis for all samples
split or duplicated with EPA.
I
Maintaining Sample Managem~nt and Tracking (3.5.2; 3.5.3)
I
Respondent shall maintain field reports, sample shipment
records, analytical results, and QA/QC reports to ensure
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• n
D
d.
-15-
that only validated analytical data are reported and
utilized in the development and evaluation of the Baseline
Risk Assessment·and Remedial Action Alternatives.
Analytical results devel9ped under the Work Plan shall not
be included in any characterization reports for the Site
unless accompanied by or1 cross-referenced to a corresponding
QA/QC report. In addition, Respondent shall establish a
data security system to ~afeguard chain-of-custody forms and
other project records tolprevent loss, damage, or alteration
of project documentation:
Site Characterization Deliverables (3.7)
Respondent shall prepare the Preliminary Site Characterization
Summary and the Remedial Investigation Report. I
I Preliminary Site Characterization Summary (3.7.2)
I
After completing field scimpling and analysis, Respondent
shall prepare a concise Site Characterization Summary. This
summary shall review the !investigative activities that have
taken place and describe 1and display data for the Site
documenting the location 'and characteristics of surface and
subsurface features .and c'ontamination at the Site including
the affected medium, location, types, physical state, and
quantity and concentrations of contaminants. In addition,
the location, dimensions,1 physical condition, and varying
concentrations of each cohtaminant throughout each source
and the extent of contaminant migration through each of the
affected media shall be dbcumented. The RI data shall be
presented in a computer disk format utilizing Lotus 1-2-3 or
other equivalent commonly1used computer software to
facilitate EPA's review of the Baseline Risk Assessment.
The Site Characterization\Summary shall provide EPA with a
preliminary reference forlevaluating the Baseline Risk
Assessment and remediation goals, evaluating the development
and screening of Remedial,Action Alternatives, and the
refinement and identification of ARARs.
Remedial Investigation (RI) Report (3.7.3)
'
Respondent shall prepare and submit a Draft RI Report to EPA
for review and approval. 'This report shall summarize
results of field activities to characterize the Site,
sources of contamination, '.nature and extent of
contamination, and the fate and transport of contaminants.
Respondent shall refer to ,the RI/FS Guidance for an outline
of the report format and c'ontents. Following comment by
EPA, Respondent shall prep~re a Final RI Report which
satisfactorily addresses EPA's comments.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
I
I
' I· -16-
I TASK 4 -TREATABILITY STUDIES (RI/FS Guidance, Chapter 5)
. I
Treatability Studies shall be performed by Respondent to assist
in the detailed analysis of alternatives, in the event that EPA
determines that these studies are necessary. If applicable,.
study results and operating conditions will later be used in the
detailed design of the selected remedial technology. The
following activities shall be performed by Respondent.
' ' a. Determination of Candidate Technologies and the Need for
Treatability Studies ( 5 .i2; 5. 4)
I
Respondent shall identify in a technical memorandum, subject to
EPA review and comment, candi~ate technologies for a Treatability
Studies program during project planning (Task 1). The listing of
candidate technologies shall cover the range of technologies '
required for alternatives analysis (Task Sa). The specific data
requirements for the Treatability Studies program shall be
determined and refined during1Site Characterization and the
development and screening of Remedial Action Alternatives (Tasks
3 and 4, respectively).
Conduct Literature Survey and Determine the.Need for
Treatability Studies (5.~)
Respondent shall conduct ia literature survey to gather
information on performance, relative costs, applicability,
removal efficiencies, operation and maintenance (O&M)
requirements, and impleme'ntability of candidate
technologies. If practical candidate technologies have not
been sufficiently demonstrated, or cannot be adequately
evaluated for the Site on: the basis of available
information, Treatability,Studies shall be conducted. EPA
shall determine whether Treatability Studies will be
required.
Evaluate Treatability Studies (5.4)
Where EPA has determined that Treatability Studies are
required, Respondent and EPA shall decide on the type of
Treatability Studies to use (e.g., bench versus pilot).
Because of the time required to design, ·fabricate, and
install pilot scale equip~ent as well as to perform testing
for various operating cond,itions, the decision to perform
pilot testing shall be mad,e as early in the process as
possible to minimize poten:tial delays of the FS. To assure
that a Treatability Study program is completed on time, and
with accurate results, Respondent shall either submit a
separate Treatability Study Work Plan or an amendment to the
original RI/FS Work Plan for EPA review and approval.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
-17-
b. Treatability Study Deliverables (5.5; 5.6; 5.8)
'
In addition to the memorandum identifying candidate technologies,
the deliverables that are required when Treatability Studies are
to be conducted include a Treatability Study Work Plan, a
Treatability Study Sampling and Analysis Plan, and a Final
Treatability Study Evaluation Report. EPA may also require a
Treatability Study Health and Safety Plan, where appropriate.
'
Tre~tability Study Work 1Plan (5.5)
Respondent shall prepar~ a Treatability Study Work Plan or
amendment to the original RI/FS Work Plan for EPA review, and
approval. This Plan shall describe the background of the
Site, remedial technologies to be tested, test objectives,
experimental procedures,i treatability conditions to be
tested, measurements.of :performance, analytical methods,
data management and analysis, health and safety, and
residual waste management. The DQOs for Treatability
Studies shall be documented as well. If pilot-scale
Treatability Studies are1 to be performed, the Treatability
Study Work Plan shall describe pilot plant installation and
start-up, pilot plant operation and maintenance procedures,
and operating conditionslto be tested. If testing is to be
performed off-site, permitting requirements must be
addressed. 1
Treatability Study Sampling and Analysis Plan (5.5)
If the original QAPP or FSAP is not adequate for defining
the activities to be performed during the Treatability
Studies, a separate Treat.ability Study SAP or amendment to
the original RI/FS SAP shall be prepared by Respondent for
EPA review and approval. 1
I It shall be designed to monitor pilot plant performance.
Task le of this Scope of ,Work provides additional
information on the requii,ements of the SAP.
Treatability Study Health and Safety Plan (5.5)
I
If the original RI/FS Health and Safety Plan is not adequate
for defining the activities to be performed during the
Treatability Studies, a separate or amended Health and
Safety Plan shall be deve~oped by Respondent. Task le of
this Scope of Work provides additional information on the
requirements of the Health and Safety Plan. EPA does not
"approve" the Treatability Study Health and Safety Plan.
Treatability Study Evaluation Report (5.6)
I
Following completion of Treatability Studies, Respondent
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-18-
shall analyze and interpret the testing results in a
technical report to EPA'. Depending on .the sequence of
activities, this report;may be a part of the RI/FS Report or
·a separate deliverable.\ The report shall evaluate each
technology's effectiveness, implementability, cost, and
actual results as compared with predicted results. The
report shall also evaluate full-scale application of the
technology, including aisensitivity analysis identifying the
key parameters affectin~ full-scale operation.
TASK 5 -DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF REMEDIAL ACTION
ALTERNATIVES (RI/FS Guidance) Chapter 4)
The development and screeninJ of Remedial Action Alternatives is
performed to select an appropriate range of waste management
options to be evaluated. Thfs range of options shall include, at
a minimum, alternatives in which treatment is used to reduce the
toxicity, mobility, or volume of the waste, but varying in the
types of treatment, the amount treated, and the manner in which
long-term residuals or untre~ted wastes are managed; alternatives
that involve containment and '.treatment components; alternatives
that involve containment withi little or no treatment; and a
no-action alternative. The following activities shall be
performed by Respondent as a 'function of the development and
screening of Remedial Action ~lternatives.
a.
I
Development and Screening of Remedial Action Alternatives
(4.2)
Respondent shall begin to dev~lop and evaluate, concurrent with
the RI.Site Characterization task, a range of appropriate waste
management options that,-at alminimum, ensure protection of human
health and the environment and comply with all ARARs.
I
Refine and Document Remedial Action Objectives (4.2.1) ' .
I
Respondent shall review and, if necessary, propose
refinement to the Site Objectives and preliminary remedial
action objectives that were established during the. Scoping
phase (Task 1). Any revised Site Objectives or revised
remedial action objectives shall.be documented in a
technical memorandum as discussed in Task lb. These
objectives shall specify \the contaminants and media of
interest, exposure pathways and receptors, and an acceptable
contaminar1t level or range of levels ( at particular
locations for each exposu'.re route).
I Develop General Response Actions (4.2.2)
' I Respondent shall develop general response actions for each
medium of interest defining containment, treatment,
excavation, pumping, or other actions, individually or in
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-19-
combination, to satisfylthe remedial action objectives.
Identify Areas and Volumes of Media (4.2.3)
Respondent shall identi~y areas and volumes of media to
which general response actions may apply, taking into
account requirements for protectiveness as identified in the
remedial action objecti~es. The chemical and physical
characterization of the 1Site and·the Baseline Risk
Assessment and remediation goals shall also be taken into
account.
Identify, ~screen,
4.2.5)
and Document Remedial Technologies (4.2.4;
I
Respondent shall identify and evaluate technologies
applicable to each general response action to eliminate
those that cannot be implemented at the Site.
"Technologies" shall mea'ri the methods by which hazardous
substances at the Site s,hall be remedied: e.g.,· "pump and
treat," "soil excavation and removal," etc. General
response actions shall b1e refined to specify remedial
technology types. Techn~logy process options for each of
the technology types shall be identified either concurrent
with the identification of technology types or following the
screening of the considered technology types.
' Process options shall be:evaluated on the basis of
effectiveness, implementability, and cost factors to select
and retain one or, if necessary, more representative
processes for each technology type. The technology types
and process options shal+ be summarized for inclusion in a
technical memorandum. The reasons for eliminating
alternatives must be specified.
I
Assemble and Document Alternatives (4.2.6)
I
Respondent shall assemble selected representative
technologies into alternatives for each affected medium or
operable unit. Together) all of the alternatives shall
represent a range of treatment and containment combinations
that shall address either the Site or the operable unit as a
whole. A summary of the lassembled alternatives and their
related action-specific ARARs shall be prepared by
Respondent for inclusion in a technical memorandum. The
reasons for eliminating ~lternatives during the preliminary
screening process must be specified.
Refine Alternatives
Upon completion of the
task, Respondent shall
above-referenced subtasks under this
refine the Remedial Action
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1--
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
b.
-20-
Alternatives to identify contaminant volumes to be
addressed by the proposed process and .sizing of critical
unit operations as necessary. Sufficient information shall
be collected for an adequate comparison of alternatives.
Remedial action objectives for each medium shall also be
refined as necessary to1incorporate any new risk assessment
information presented in the Baseline Risk Assessment
Report. Additionally, action-specific ARARs shall be
updated as the Remedial iAction Alternatives are refined.
I
Conduct and Document Screening Evaluation of Each
Alternative (4.3)
I
Respondent may perform a: final screening process based on
short and long term aspe:cts of effectiveness,
implementability, and rerative cost. Note that the
evaluation of effectiveness involves evaluating the I . long-term and short-term risks -among other factors -
associated with a remedial alt.ernative. Generally, this
screening process is only necessary when there are many
feasible alternatives available for detailed analysis. If
necessary, the screening;of alternatives shall be conducted
to assure that only the alternatives with the most favorable
composite evaluation of all factors are retained for further
analysis. -
I
As appropriate, the screening shall preserve the range of
treatment and containment alternatives that was initially
developed. The range of\remaining alternatives shall
include options that use,treatment technologies and
permanent solutions to the maximum extent practicable. .
Respondent shall prepare la technical memorandum summarizing
the results and reasoning employed in screening, arraying
alternatives that remain ,after screening, and identifying
the action-specific ARARs for the alternatives that remain
after screening. !
Alternatives Development 'and Screening Deliverables ( 4. 5)
I
' Respondent shall prepare a technical memorandum summarizing the
work performed and the results: of each task above, including an
alternatives array summary. This alternatives array shall be
modified by Respondent when conducting Task 6 if required by
EPA's comments to assure identification of a complete and
appropriate range of viable alternatives to be considered in the
detailed analysis. This deliverable shall document the methods,
rationale, and results of the alternatives screening process.
I
TASK 6 -DETAILED ANALYSIS OF REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES (RI/FS
Guidance, Chapter 6)
I The detailed analysis shall be 1conducted by Respondent to provide
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-21-
EPA with the information needed to allow for the selection of a
remedy for the Site.
a. Detailed Analysis of Alternatives (6.2)
I
' Respondent shall conduct a detailed analysis of remaining
alternatives. This analysis\shall consist of an assessment of
each option against a set of 'nine evaluation criteria and a
comparative review of all options using the same nine evaluation
criteria as a basis for comp~rison. ·
Apply Nine Criteria and IDocument Analysis (6.2.1 -6.2.4)
Respondent shall apply nine evaluation criteria to the
assembled Remedial Action Alternatives to ensure that the
selected Remedial Actiod Alternative will be protective of
human health and the env'ironment; will be in compliance
with, or include a waiver of, ARARs; will be cost-effective;
will utilize permanent sblutions and alternative treatment
technologies, or resourcb recovery technologies, to the
maximum extent practicable; and will address the statutory
preference for treatmentj as a principal element.
I •
The evaluation criteria include: (1) ·overall protection of
human health and the environment; (2) compliance with ARARs;
(3) long-term effectiveness and permanence; (4) reduction of
toxicity, mobility, or volume; (5) short-term effectiveness;
(6) implementability; (7) cost; (8) State acceptance; and
(9) community acceptance, Criteria 8 and 9 are considered
after the RI/FS Report has been released to the ·general
public. For each alternative, Respondent shall provide: (l)
a description of the alternative that outlines the waste
management strategy involved and.identifies the key ARARs
associated with each alternative; and (2) a discussion of
the individual criterionlassessment. Since Respondent does
not have direct input onlcriteria (8) State acceptance and
( 9) commur.ity acceptance,, these two criteria will be
addressed by EPA after completion of the Draft FS Report. I
Compare Alternatives Against Each Other and Document the
Comparison of Alternatives (6.2.5; 6.2.6)
I
Respondent shall perform 1a comparative analysis among the
Remedial Action Alternati~ves. That is, each alternative
shall be compared against: the others using the nine
evaluation criteria as a basis of comparison. No
alternative shall be iden'tified by Respondent as the
preferred alternative in the Feasibility Study.
Identification and selection of the preferred alternative is
conducted by EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-22-
b. Detailed Analysis Deliverables (6.5)
. I Respondent shall prepare a Draft FS Report for EPA review and
comment; This report, as ultimately adopted or amended by EPA,
provides a basis for remedy ~election by EPA and documents the
development and analysis of Remedial Action Alternatives.
Respondent shall refer to the RI/FS Guidance for an outline of
the report format and the required report content. Respondent
shall prepare a Final FS Report which satisfactorily addresses
EPA's comments. Once EPA's domments have been addressed by
Respondent to EPA's satisfaction and EPA approval has been
obtained or an amendment has 'been furnished by EPA, the Final FS
Report may be bound with the ·Final RI Report. . .
•
I.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
D
-23-
ATTACHMENT A
REFERENCES
The following list, although
the regulations and guidance
process:
not comprehensive, comprises many
~ocuments that apply to the RI/FS
of
' 1. The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
2.
3.
4.
· .. 5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Contingency Plan, March 8, 1990.
. ' .
"Guidance for Conducting;Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies Unde~ CERCLA, Interim Final" U.S. EPA,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, October 1988,
OSWER Directive No. 9355;3-0l. ' I
"Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible Party
Participation in Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Studies," U.S. EPA, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement,
Appendix A to OSWER Directive No. 9355.3-01. I .
"Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Responsible Party
Remedial Investigations ~nd Feasibility Studies," U.S. EPA,
Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, OSWER Directive No.
9835.3.
"A Compendium of Superfun,d Field Operations Methods," Two
Volumes, U.S. EPA, Office1 of Emergency and Remedial
Response, EPA/540/P-87 /00·la, August 1987, OSWER Directive
No. 9355.0-14. '
"EPA NEIC Policies and Procedures Manual," May 1978, revised
November 1984, EPA-330/9-78-001-R.
"Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities,"
U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response and
Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, EPA/540/G-87/003,
March 198(, OSWER Directive No. 9335.0-7B.
"Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality
Assurance Project Plans," '.u.s. EPA, Office of Research and
Development, Cincinnati, OH, QAMS-004/80, December 29, 1980. . • I .
"Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality
Assurance Project Plans," ·u. S. EPA, Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response, QAMS-005/80, December 1980.
'
"Users Guide to the EPA Contract Laboratory Program," U.S.
EPA, Sample Management Office, December 1986.
I, "Interim Guidance on CompL1.ance with Applicable or Relevant
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
-24-
and Appropriate Requiremknts," U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response, July 9, 1987, OSWER Directive No.
9234.0-05. '
"CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual," Two.Volumes,
U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, August
1988 (Draft), OSWER Directive No. 9234.1~01 and -02.
I
"Guidance on Remedial Actions for Contaminated Ground Water
at Superfund Sites," u.sl EPA, Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response, (Draft), OSWER Directive No. 9283.1-2.
"Draft Guidance on Prepai-ing Superfund Decision Documents," u.s. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, March
1988, OSWER Directive No; 9355.3-02
"Interim Final Risk AsseJsment Guidance for Superfund -
Volume I -Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part A," U.S.
EPA, Office of Emergency land Remedial Response,
EPA/540/l-89/002A, December 1989, OSWER Directive No.
9285.7-0la.
"Interim Final Risk Asses'sment Guidance for Superfund -
Volume I -Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part B," U.S.
EPA, Office of Emergency :and Remedial Response,
EPA/540/l-89/002B, OSWER Directive No, 9285.7-0lb. I .
"Interim Final Risk Asses'sment Guidance for Superfund -
Volume I -Human Health Eyaluation Manual, Part C," U.S.
EPA, Office of Emergency ~nd Remedial Response,
EPA/540/1-89/002C, OSWER Directive No. 9285.7-0lc,
"Interim Final Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund -
Volume II -Environmental;Evaluation Manual," U.S. EPA,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA/540/1-89/001,
March 1989, OSWER Directive No. 9285.7-01.
"Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual," U.S. EPA, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA/540/1-88/001, April
1988, OSWER Directive Nol 9285.5-1.
I
"Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment," U.S. EPA,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA/540/G-90/008,
October 1990, OSWER Direc~ive No. 9285.7-05.
"Role of the Baseline
Selection Decisions,"
9355.0-30.
Risk Assessment in Superfund Remedy
April 22, 1991, OSWER Directive No.
I
"Health and Safety Requirements of Employees Employed in
Field Activities," U.S. E~A, Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response, July 12, 1981, EPA Order No. 1440.2.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, n
0
I
I
I
I
I
-25-
23. OSHA Regulations in 29 CFR 1910.120 (Federal Register 45654,
December 19, 1986).
!
24. "Interim Guidance on Administrative Records for Selection of
CERCLA Response Actions,\• U.S. EPA, Office of Waste Programs
Enforcement, March 1, 19~9, OSWER Directive No. 9833.3A.
25. "Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook," U.S. EPA,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, June 1988, OSWER
Directive No. 9230.0-3B. 1
I
26. "Community Relations During Enforcement Activities And
Development of the Admin:i!strative Record," U.S. EPA, Office
of Waste Programs Enforc~ment, November 1988, OSWER
Directive No. 9836.0-lA, :
' 27. "Environmental Compliance, Branch Standard Operating
Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual", U.S. EPA Region
IV, Environmental Service's Division, February 1, 1991
(revised periodically). '.
28. "USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work for
Organic Analysis", U.S. EPA, Office of .Emergency and
Remedial Response, February 1988.
'
29. "USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work for
Inorganics Analysis", U.S; EPA, Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response, July 1988. ·
30. "Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual", U.S. EPA, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency,Response, November 1992, OSWER
Directive No. 9345.1-07.
31. "Guidance for Performing Site Inspections Under CERCLA",
U.S. EPA, Office of Emerg~ncy and Remedial Response,
September 1992, OSWER Dir~ctive 9345.1-05.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
TASK
TASK 1
TASK 3
TASK 4
-26-
I ATTACHMENT B
'
SUMMARY OF THE MAJOR DELIVERABLES FOR THE
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AT.
THE DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SUPERFUND SITE I •
DELIVERABLE
SCOPING
RI/FS Work Plan (15)
I
Field Sampling 1and
Analysis Plan (15)
'
Quality Assuran~e
Project Plan ( Si)
Site Health and•
Safety Plan ( 5) I .1
' SITE CHARACTERIZATION
Technical Memorandum
on Contaminant Fate
and Transport Mbdeling
(where appropriate) (5)
.Preliminary Site
Characterization
Summary ( 15)
EPA RESPONSE
Review and Approve
Review and Approve
Review and Approve
Review and Comment
Review and Approve
Review and Comment
Remedial Review and Approve
Investigation
Report (15)
TREATABILITY STUDIES .(if necessary)
Technical Memorandum
Identifying I
Candidate
Technologies (10)
'
Treatability stJdy Work
I Plan (or amendment to
original Work Pl!an) (10)
'
Treatabili ty Stu
0
dy
SAP ( or amendmen't to
original SAP) (10)
Review and Comment
Review and Approve
Review and Approve
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TASK 5
TASK 6
1-21-
1
Treatability Study
Evaluation Report (10)
'
· Review and Approve
' DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF REMEDIAL ACTION
ALTERNATIVES
Technical Memorandum
Documenting Revised
Remedial Action'
Objectives (5)
Technical Memorandum
on Remedial ·
Technologies, ,
Alternatives, and
Screening (5)
Review and Approve
Review and Comment
' DETAILED ANALYSIS OF ·REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
Feasibility Study
( FS) Report ( 15)'
Review and Approve
Note: The number in parenthesis'indicates the number of copies to
be submitted by Respondent. One copy shall be unbou·nd, the
remainder shall be bound. Also; see the Administrative Order on
Consent for additional reporting requirements and further
instructions on submittal and d+spositions of deliverables.
I
I
I
I
I
I.-
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ -28-,
ATTACHMENT C
GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR THE.MAJOR
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY
ACTIVITIES AT THE DAVISi PARK ROAD TCE SUPERFUND SITE
ACTIVITY
Effective Date of AOC
Supervising Contractor Selected
I
Supervising Contractor Approved by EPA I
Draft RI/FS Work Plan and Asso~iated
Documents Submitted 1
Draft Treatability Study Work P,lan
Submitted
Final RI/FS Work Plan and Associated
Documents Submitted
Final Treatability Study Work P~an
Submitted
Initiate Fieldwork
Fieldwork Complete
Preliminary Site Characterization
Summary Submitted '
Draft RI Submitted
Final RI Submitted
Draft FS and Draft Treatability 'study
Report Submitted . ,
Final FS and Final Treatability Study
Report Submitted 1
SCHEDULE DATE /DAYS)
0
0+15
X
X+60
X+60
X+l20
X+120
X+l50
X+225
X+295
X+350
X+410
X+430
X+490
Note: Other deliverables listed in Attachment B shall also be
incorporated into the schedule tb be submitted as part of the·
RI/FS Work Plan. The above schedule may be revised by mutual
agreement of the parties to accomplish the goals set out in the
SCAM Model; however any lack of agreement regarding schedule
revisions shall not be subject to the Dispute Resolution
procedures set forth in Section ~IV of the Consent Order.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
State of North Carolina 1 Department of Environment, , Health and Natural Resources·
Division of Solid Waste Monogemerit
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary·
William L. Meyer, Director
Mr. Craig Benedikt
NC CERCLA Project Officer
EPA Region IV Waste Division .
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
RE:
' May 24, 1994
'
'
NA
DEHNR
MAY 2 71994
... Expanded Site Inspection (ESD
Davis Park Road TCE Site,INCD 986 175 644 Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Benedikt:
I Enclosed herewith is the Expanded Site Inspection report for Davis Park Road TCE site (NCD 986 175 644). ,
I If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone].
Enclosure
HZ/sr
cc: Dexter Matthews
file
'
Sincerely,
....
:2L'~-----
Harry Zinn
Environmental Engineer
Federal Contracts Branch
NC Superfund Section
PO Box 27687. Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone] ,_,_ ----I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I
I
u
B
D
m
STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
DepartmenJ of EnvironmenJ, Health,
and Natural Resources , Division of Solid Waste ManagemenJ · Supe,jund Section
EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION I
Davis Park 1Road TCE Site
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
NCD 986 175 644
Referen~e No. 05489
May 1994
Barry Zinn, Environmental Engineer
Division or Solid Waste Management
Superlund Section
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
R
n
0
I
EXP ANDEi> SITE INSPECTION
I . . Davis, Road Park TCE I
NCD 986 175 644
Gastonia, GastJn County, North Carolina I
May 1994
Superfund Section
Division of Sol,id Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
----
--; ... _
.,f:-,~ --✓ .? -~-Harry Zin
Environmental Engineer
-+----~--r-rover Nicholson
Federal Contracts Branch Head
I
I
I
I TABLE OF CONTENTS
I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
I I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . • . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. SITE DESCRIPTION and WASTE CHARACfERISTICS ........... · 1. I 3.
. I
WASTFJSOURCE SAMPLING .: .......................... 4
' I 4. GROUND WATER PATHWAY ........................... 9
5. SURFACE WATER PATHWAY '. ......................... 14 I 6. SOIL EXPOSURE and AlR PATHWAYS .................... 14
' I 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION, ........................ 15
APPENDIX I REFERENCES
m
m
D
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1.
TABLE 3-1.
TABLE 3-2.
TABLE 4-1.
TABLE 4-2.
LIST OF TABLES
PREVIOUS SAMPLING RESULTS ............... 5 I .
I
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . 7
SOIL SAMPLE A~AL YTICAL RESULTS . ; ......... 7
GROUNDWATER 1SAMPLE
LOCA TJONS .. ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
GROUNDWATER :SAMPLE ANALYTICAL
RESULTS IN UG/~G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
I
I
I LIST OF FIGURES I
I FIGURE 1
. ; .
TOPOGRAPIDC MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . 2
FIGURE2 SITE LOCATION:MAP .......... , ............ 3
I FIGURE3 I SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS .................. 8 ·
I
I
I
I
m
I
m
g
D
D
D
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
u
0
LO INTRODUCTION
' Under the authority of the: Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), and a cooperative agreement with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency: (EPA), Waste Management Division, Region IV,
the North Carolina Superfund Section conducted an Expanded Site Inspection (ES!) at
the Davis Park Road site in Gast~nia, Gaston County, North Carolina. The purpose
of the ESI was to obtain the data' necessary to assess the threat posed to human health
and the environment and to complete a Hazard Ranking System (HRS) score for the
site to determine the need for further action under CERCLA or other authority. This
investigation included viewing existing files and sample data, conducting groundwater
and soil sampling under EPA Coritract Laboratory Program (CLP) protocol (January
25, 1994), and collecting additionp.I non-sampling data needed to tes.t previous PA/SI
hypotheses and to document HRS :factors. · .
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 Location
The Davis Park Road TCE Site (DPR) is located between Hudson Boulevard
and Dogwood Avenue west of the1 city of Gastonia within the Gastonia Extra
Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) areai The site consists of an area of contaminated soil
behind the Moore's Transmission and Auto Repair Shop (Moore's) and a plume of
contaminated groundwater that begins at the Moore's property at 2307 Davis Park
Road and extends south along the 'west side of Davis Park Road to Dogwood Avenue.
The site also includes the Cedar o'ak Park Subdivision located on the east side of
Davis Park Drive within the confines of Cedar Oak Circle. The site can be found on
the Gastonia South, North Carolina USGS 7.5' Quadrangle Map at latitude 350 13'
' ' 56" N and 810 13' 08" W (Figure 1, Ref. 3). · . '
2.2 Site Description
2.3
The site, situated on approximately 20 acres, includes private businesses and
residential homes. The topography of the Moore's property is slightly sloped to the
west towards Crowder Creek (Figure 2), The source of the plume of contaminated
groundwater is an area of contamiAated soil located behind Moore's in the vicinity of
a drain line exiting the service bay in the facility.
Operational History
Prior to 1960, the site was owned by Mr. John Birch of Gastonia, who
operated a service station on-site. Mr. Carl Bell, 2916 Burnt Mill Road, Charlotte,
purchased the property in about 19~0 and operated a service station on-site until about
1979 or 1980, when he leased the property to Mr. Roy Moore, who currently
operates a transmission rebuild and repair facility on-site (Ref. 4, 5, 6).
1
I
I
I
REMEDIAL SITE ASSFSSMENT DECISION -EPA RF.GION IV
Site Name: Davis Park Rood TCE Site EPA ID#: NCD986175644
I Alias Site Names:---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City: Gastonia
Beler Lo Report Dated: May 27. 1994
Report developed by: NCDEHR
DECISION:
County or Parish: G,.,.asto=n"----1
State: oaN=C __ _
~ type: Expanded Site Inspection
I
I I L Further Remedial Site A oeot under CERCLA (Superfund) is not required beca11Be·
I
la. Site does not qualify for further remedial I I lb. Site may qualify for further I I RCRA site assessment under CERCLA I action, but is deferred to I . I NRC (No Further Remedial Action Planned -NFRAP)
Ix I 2. Further Asa=rrn-t Needed Under CERCI~ 2a. (optional) Priority: Ix I Higher I I Lower
2b. Activity
Type:
I I PA
I I SI
I I ESI,
I xi IIBS ,evaluation
I I Other ----------------------------
-DISCUSSION/RATIONALE: ·1 I ·-·· I Site is located along Davis Road in Gastonia North Carolina. The site has operated as either an automobile repair shop or a transmission repair shop since 1960. There fu an area of contaminated soil (appr~ximately 5 square feet) located at the rear of the property which is highly ron!froioaW with TCE, PCE and other related voJ,;,.tile organic compounds. Several private wells in the area including. a subdivision well are contaminated with TCE.-.T)le contamination levels exceed the MCL for TCE (6PPBJ iuid the site appears to be a solid candidate for an HRS package. Hopefully, some steps are already being taken to provide the people who are using the contaminated water wells with some other form of potable water supply. HRS high priority.
I
' I. I .
I 1 n( Report Reviewed ' 1/r ( ff/'· r< lJ and Approved by: John McKeown Signatur~: --------Date:
Site Decision
Signaturd: ':-°''' ~"1j ~ L 711ih':, Made by: John McKeown Date: I i
l!!!!!I !!!!!I m= == llliiiiil raa liiii1 liiii iliiiil iiii1 iiiil _, . -----11111 iiil
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ti~~e L· g
D . Sa.m -P \e l~o.,'-H 6(15
B
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
D
D
u
m
I
I
I
2.4 \Vaste Characteristics
In March of 1990 during 'routine sampling of the community well at the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision, and again'. in April 1990, high levels of trichloroethylene (TCE)and tetrachloroethylene (PCE)were detected in the groundwater. During follow-up sampling by the Gaston County Health Department (GCH), three other private residential wells were also found to be contaminated (Ref. 7).
The North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) performed extensive sampling of the private ·,wells in the vicinity of the site from May 1990 to August 1992 (Table 2-1). Several samples were collected from soils behind the Moore's operation close to a drairi line which exits the rear of the building (Ref.8). These soils were highly contaminJted with PCE and TCE (Table 3-2). The drain line was installed when Acme Petroleum· installed service bays in the shop portion of the service station. A holding tank was to be installed, but, when bedrock was encountered at 2-3 feet, .the tank ll(aS not installed (Ref. 9).
During an off-site reconnaissance on September 14, 1993, no other likely I sources of PCE and TCE were located in the vicinity of the site (Ref. 10). Based on. this information, the North Carolina Superfund Section believes discharges from the • drain line have contaminated the s6ils and subsequently the groundwater behind the· Moore's operation. The area of soils contamination has not been fully delineated; however, sampling has shown that
0
the area is greater than 1 square foot (Ref. 11) and the area of stained soils appears to be approximately 5 square feet.
3;0 WASTE/SOURCE SAMPLING
3.1 Sample Locations
Based on the existing document.lllon of the drain line being the possible source as listed in Section 2.4, source sampling conducted during the ESI was limited to confirming the contaminated soils around the: drain line. The soil sample locations are listed on Table 3-1 and are sho~,n on Figure 3-1 . Since PCE, TCE and their degradation products were the only conum1nan1s present in previous samples, only Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) linal) \IS were performed on the samples. A duplicate soil sample was to have bc~n c<iliL-c1L-d from the third soil sample area, however, when bedrock was encoun1crc<l at :4 • depth not enough soil was in the sampling auger bucket to ·fill a duplicate.
:4
II
TABLE 2·1 s.-.,111,ln L,,.:a1iu11 A~1oncy D,,,., Sample Typn PCE TCE Chlnrolnr111 Cl:<· 1.2 I, 1 O,r.hloro I 1. 2,,1-r,i 1,.1,5-1,i (l1'1r.r~
Dicl,lornethe11e l"lhi1n~ lmethylhf'nlriru~ ,,,r.1l,ylt1.,nlellr. Cr.d;ir O;tk Suhrlivi~iou Aqualech JfJ 1/90 01inldnn Water i ,., /,, 2-1.l 34.9 9.2 I Aqu.-,111ch 4/1 7190 , 2:1:7 34.9 92 I GCEH ' 5/1 /90 51.8 i EPA ESD 7/16/90 12 31 I GCEH B/23/90 2tJ.9 56. I t,,lCII -__ Y!,_":_ __ EPA ESO 10/9/90 14 41
~
Charl!!ls May (C0-11 GCEH 4/27190 Drinkinn Water "•• ,, " 101.4 1K J.8 !men "' 2419 Davis Park Road GCEH ? 5/1 5/90 134.3 EPA ESD 7/6/90 82 J.BJ GCEH B/23/90 lraci, 116.3 trace 4 yo, EPA ESQ 10/9/90 68AJ 3.4AJ GCEH 1/30/91 IK 84.2 1K J.5 yo, GCEH 5/20/91 1K 66.2 1K 2.8 trace yo,
Roy Moore (Moore Tr;uu:missionl DEM 5/7/90 Soil behind naran11 late Elutina Chemicals ILECI 1 .J EE06 2307 Davis Pa,k Road OEM 517/90 Soil 18~ deep al dump spot Clean DEM 7/12/90 Soil 32" deep al oil in ditch LEC-44000 I "' DEM 7/12/90 Soil 12" deep at oil in ditch LEC -14000 .••. J . OEM 8/8/91 Soil 30• deep oily area behind shop 370 2700 2400 580 yo, DEM 8/8/91 Water in holo JO -2000 16 ye, DEM 8/12/92 Soil beneath drain pipe ,1 720 1500 730 910 yo, DEM 8/12/9f Soil 1' out and 1 s· deep al pipe 630 1300 520 yo, DEM 8/1 3/92 Water th1u drain pipe 26 "' DEM 8/13/92 Monitor Well 111 0.75 1K
Charles M;iy (C0· 11 GCEH 4/27/90 Drink.inn Water 1K 101.4 1K J.8 trace yo, 2419 Davis Park Road GCEH ? 5/15/90 134.3 EPA ESD 7/6/90 82 3.8J -.. ,. GCEH 8/23/90 -tr;ice 116.3 trace 4 yo, ·-EPA ESD 10/9/90 68AJ 3.4AJ GCEH 1/30/9 I ,. 84.2 IK J.5 ye, GCEH 5120/91 1 K 66.2 IK 2.8 trace yo,
Slr.yland Drive CW !C0-2) GCEH 4/27/90 Drink.inn Water .. I race trace sen ni.1p
Jr.rilr.ins CW (C0-31 GCEH 4/27/90 D1i11kinO W;it,n CLl:AN ,;ec rn;ip'
Blake/Puril"n CW IC0-41 GCEH 4/27/90 Drink.inn Water CLEAN see map
-
Cunninahmn/Penny P;1rk CW (CO-SJ GCEH 4/27/90 DrinkiM Water tr.ice lrnce tf;ice sen ,nap
Russell Graves !C0-61 DEM 517/90 Drinking W;itcr 0.31 8.4 0.18 • 2425 Davis Park Road GCEH S/15/90 tr.ice 6.8 GCEH 7/1 2'90 1 .
lllllt .. .. -

-
l!!!!!!!!I !!!!!!I 11!!!!!1 l!!!l!!I l!!!!!!!!I l!!!!!I l'llllm
TABLE 1-1 fcon'IJ ~ompln L,1r.;11ion A!1•11!1;y Onie S(llnpln Typn l'CE IC[ 1:1i1molm1t1 1:1s-I, 2 I. 1-Uwhlnru I ,l,'1-J ,i 1 • .1.'> '" Othr.1,;; Dichlorocthene nthane 11,clhylbenzer1c methylbP.n,ene Billy Frank (CO-71 DEM . 5/7/90 Drinking Water 0.25· 2301 Davis Park Road GCEH 5/15/90 trace 44.5 !race <8 GCEH 7/1 2/90 trace 37.1 2.6
Dobbio P111ke1 IC0-61 GCEH 5/15/90 Drinkina Wa1e1 1K 2503 O;iv,s Park Road ..
Glenda Rowland (C0-11) GCEH 6/1 /90 Drinking Water
Y•• 2347 He!laewood Circle
W.l. Godwin (C0-121 GCEH 6/1 /90 D1inkina Water
yo, 2231 Davis P.trk Roat.I
Resampled IC0-231 GCEH 7/12/90 Drinkina Water 1 K trace
Shirley Fortner (C0-1 31 GCEH 6/1/90 Drinking Wa1er Clean. 2717 Davis Paik Road
John Crenshaw (C0-141 GCEH 6/1 /90 Drinkina Water trar.e 1.2 trace trace 2816 Davis Park Road
Tarte (C0-15) GCEH 6/1 /90 Drinkino W11ter
yes 2501· Briaroak
Howe (C0-161 GCEH 6/11 /90 Drinking Water u: 1 K "' 2603 Davis Park Road
WGAS Radio (C0-1 71 GCEH 6/11 /90 Drinking W111er Cle,m 627 Davis P111k Ro.id
-. ------Crumley_(C0-181 GCEH -6/1 1 /90 Drinking Water l,a¢e 2723 Davis P;trk Road
Coe IC0-19/ GCEH 6/11/90 Drinkino W;iter trace 1K 2212 Q;,vis P,ork Ro;1fl
Moore CW IC0-22) GCEH 7112/90 Drinking Water trao1 57.55 trnce 2.2 trace ye~ se" rn,1p
Doris Corella
2403 D.ivi~ P.itk Ro.id GCEH 5/20/90 Drinldna W,11c1 trace 24.3 1K 1.6 yes GCEH 1/30/91 tr.n.:e 28 !face 2.1 yes DEM 7/23/92 17 0.33 2.2
James M11y DEM 5/7/90 Drinkino Water 0.85
yes 2400 Skyland Drive
Monte GCEH 8/23/90 D1i11kina Wa1c1 (Filtered) 8.1 yes ' GCEH 8/23/90 Drinkiny W.-,1er (Unli!tcred) trace 441.1 1K 1.5 yr,s
ll!!!!!!!t ·--11!!!!!!1 11\!!!!!1 == •liiiiiil iiii liiiiil -
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
g
n
n
D
•
I
3.2 Analytical Results
Samples used to delineate the source area of contamination were analyzed by a laboratory participating in the US 1,EPA CLP as specified in the CLP Statement of Work. Data was validated by the:us EPA Region.IV, Environmental Service Division, and the validated data along with the Data Qualifier Report were provided to the North Carolina Superfund Section. A complete copy is provided in the APPENDIX to this report. ;
No VOC's were detected iri the background sample. TCE and/or 1,2-dichloroethene (TOTAL), a biodegradation product ofTCE, were detected in·all of the soil samples. Toluene and total xylenes were also detected in the soil samples,
however these are not above any ti,ealth based benchmarks and are not contaminants of concern (Table 3-2, Ref.2). . .
6
-""""" """""' """""' === iiiil -------iillil I!!!!!!!! I!!!!! l!!!IIS == == -

-

-

-

-
Sample Number Type
DR-001-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
DR-002-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
DR-003-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
DR~004-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
·---
1,2-Dichloroethene (fOTAL)
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
Total Xylenes
ND -Non-Detect
BQL -Below Quantitation Limit
TABLE 3-1
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
• NCD 986 175 644
Soil Sample Locations
Rational
Background Sample
Source sample #1
Source sample #2
Source sample #3
-
TABLE 3-2
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCD 986 175 644
Soil Sample Analytical Results
ug/kg
DR-001-SB DR-002-SB
ND 38
ND 20
ND 79
ND ND
ND 210
7
Description
Backgrou~d sample located on-
site.
l' south of drain pipe
2' west of drain pipe
9" west of pipe "
---. ---·
DR-003-SB · DR-004-SB
2(,() 38
17 4-BQL
230 46
45 ND .
330 100
IJ.
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;
. .
0 o □□□□□o
<>oo □000
A-DR-001-SB Source B-DR-002-SB Source C-DR-003-SB Source
0
D-DR-004-SB Backsround Soil 1-DR-001-PW Godwin Well 2-DR-002-PW Bill Philbeck 3-DR-003-PW Doris Corella 4-DR-004-PW Charles May 5-DR-005--PW Russell Graves
"
--,,.. .....
/ ' ' t'looRE s \ I
Hvosor-i BLIIO. I ,·'\ \ 8 G " "'• A \ ,
.\
\
' .....__ ____ . ----
R IC.I-ILAJ\10 AVG. □ □E'.l □ Do
d D DD D □
&1.i=N A.AVEAJ AVi;
D □□□Do D
D D DD D D
_ i-1\. 011-~ C.I fll.l-E cot> 0 00 0 □
D
'3 D ..
·,
/
/
I 6~ DR-006-PW Cedar Oaks Subdivision
~========-Fig. No: 3-1 Title: CLP Sanpling Points for Davis Park Road TCE site
· • North Caroli~;-·-
Division of Solid I Waste Management
-------------
Scale:Not to Scale Date: April 1994 Drawn By: H. Zinn
,...,_ ·----.c . . , ,...
..
I
I
I
I
I
g
0
D
I
m
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.3 Source Conclusions
Sampling has confirmed that an area of soil in the vicinity of the drain line is contaminated with TCE and .degradation products; 1,2-Dichloroethene and 1,1,1-Trichloroethene. The area encompassed by the samples is approximately 0.75 sq. ft., however the total area of contamination is suspected of being larger based on the observed stained soils.
4.0 GROUNDWATER PATHWAY
4.1 Hydrogeology
The DPR site is located within the Piedmont Physiographic Province and is characterized as foliated to massive granitic rock unit of the King Mountain Belt. The formation is described as a coarse grained, porphyritic, well-foliated biotite granite. Others have described this formation to have several intrusive phases that exhibit cross-cutting relationships and differ in texture and degree of foliation. The rocks are megacrystic to equigranular granite to quartz monwnite (Ref. 13).
Most of the domestic water supplies, industrial supplies, and several municipal supplies in Gaston County are obtained from wells. Dug wells, usually found in older, rural areas, derive their water from the saprolite which is the weathered and disintegrated zone between the soil and the unweathered bedrock. Drilled wells, used for higher yields for industry and municipal use, obtain their water from either granite or schist formations (Ref. 14).
According to Mr. Mark Durway, the former hydrogeologist for the Gaston County Health Department, the saprolite and the fractured bedrock act as a single hydrologic unit (Ref. 15).
4.2 Groundwater Targets
The closest domestic well is located at the Doris Corella residence, 2403 Davis Park Road, about 150 feet south of the site. The closest community well is the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision well located less that 1/4 mile from the site (Figure 1). At the time of the ESI sampling event, the NC DEM was overseeing the installation of a deep monitoring well on-site. No sample results are available at this time.
Determining the population using groundwater as their potable water supply required several steps. First, the areas served by the Gastonia Water System were delineated on the topographic maps covering the Target Distance Limits (TDL). The urban areas, denoted as pink on the topographic maps, located outside of the Gastonia Water System were planimetered and this area was multiplied by the population density figure for South Gastonia (315.3 people/sq. mi.). Community wells were
9
..
I
I
I
u
I
D
I
located and houses served by them were delineated. Finally, those houses not covered by any of the previous delineations were counted as being served by private wells, and that number was multiplied by the house density for Gaston County (2.64 people/ household)(Ref. 16, 17).
Population Relyin& on Groundwater For Potable Water
Radius Population
0 -14 162
1,--½ 441
1h -1 229
1 -

2

2132
2 -

3

.:.
5808
3 -4 3357
4.3 Previous Investigations
The groundwater pathway for the DPR site has been extensively investigated from the time of the discovery of the contaminated well at Cedar Oak Park Subdivision up to the present as can be seen on Table 1. Gaston County Health, NC DEM, EPA ESD, and NC Superlund have all been involved in determining the extent of contamination that has occur-ml at the site .. The detection of PCE, TCE and their degradation products has been consistent in those wells that are contaminated.
I 4.4 Sample Locations
I
I
I
I
I
I
The purpose of the ESI groundwater sampling was to establish private and · community well contamination using CLP protocol. To do this we collected a background sample and samples fro,m the five closest private and community wells which have shown to be contaminated during past investigations. To conserve CERCLA resources other nearby private and community wells which have been shown by past investigations to have levels of contamination below health-based
benchmarks were not sampled. No on-site monitoring wells were present at the time of the ESI sampling event.
10
m
I
I 4.5 Analytical Results
I
I
I
I
u
u
I
n
0
0
D
0
0
D
D
u
Samples used to document a observed release of contaminants to groundwater
and to determine actual contamination of drinking water wells were analyzed by a
laboratory participating in the EPA CLP as specified in the CLP Statement of work.
Data was validated by the US EPA Region IV, Environmental Service Division, and
the validated data along with the Data Qualifier Report were provided to the North
Carolina Superfund Section. A complete copy is provided in the APPENDIX to this
report.
Only VOC's were tested for during the ESI since PCE, TCE, and their
degradation products are the only suspected contaminants at the site. Table 4-2
summarizes the results of the VOC analysis performed on the groundwater samples.
Samples DR-003-PW, DR-004-PW, E>R-005-PW, and DR-006-PW all show
contamination with PCE and/or TCE at levels above health-based benchmarks
published in the Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (March 1993) ..
11
-------~~~~~--~~----TABLE4-l
Sample Number
DR-OCH-PW
DR-002-PW
DR-003-PW
DR-004-PW
DR-005-PW
DR--006-PW
DR-101-PW
DR-104-PW
DR-105-PW
DR-106-PW
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
. NCD 986 175 644
Groundwater Sample Locations
Type Rational
Groundwater grab Background Sample
.
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine .actual
contamination
Trip Blank QNQC
Preservative Blank QNQC
Rinsate Blank QNQC
Duplicate QNQC
12
Description
Godwin Well
2231 Davis Park Road
Philbeck Well
2301 Davis Park Road
Corella Well
2403 Davis Park Road
May Well
2419 Davis Park Road
Tompkins Well
2425 Davis Park Road
Cedar Oak Park Sub.
Cedar Oak Circle
Trip Blank
Preservative Blank
Rinsate Blank
Duplicate
- - - - - - - - - -.. l!!!!!l!!I -== == liliil liilliil liiiil· liiil
PCE TCE
DR-OCH-PW ND ND
DR-002-PW ND. ND
DR-003-PW ND 10
DR-004-PW ND 38
DR-005-PW. ND 11
DR-006-PW 18 51
DR-101-PW ND ND
DR-104-PW .· ND ND
DR-105-PW ND ND
DR-106-PW 17 50
ND -Non-Detect
BQL -Below Quantitation Limit .
TABLE 4-2
DA VIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCD 986 175 644
Groundwater Sample Analytical Results
ug/kg
CHLOROFOR 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
M (fOTAL)
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND 2-BQL
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
-11 ND
3-BQL ND
ND ND
13
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHENE
ND
ND
ND "
ND
ND
5-BQL
ND
ND
ND
5-BQL
I
I
g
D
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.6 Conclusions
The DPR site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The saprolite/fractured bedrock make up a single hydrologic unit. Previous sampling has shown contamination attributable to the site.
Samples collected during this ESI using CLP protocol havedocumented a release of contaminants from the site to the groundwater and contamination of potable wells exceeding health-based benchmarks.
5.0 SURFACE WATER PATHWAY
5.1 · Hydrology
Surface water drainage from the site is through swales, ditches and an intermittent stream for over 1/2 mile before it enters Crowder Creek, the Probable Point of Entry (PPE)(Figure 1). The 15 mile surface water pathway ends in Crowder Creek before it enters Lake Wylie.
5.2 Targets
Crowder Creek is not classified as potable but is a fishery (Ref. 8, 9). No surface water intakes are located within the 15 mile surface water pathway.
5.3 Conclusion
Since the contaminants are VOC's with relatively high health-based
benchmarks and previous investigations have shown that the site does not pose a significant threat to human health and the environment, the surface water pathway is not a pathway of concern.
6.0 SOIL EXPOSURE and Am PATHWAYS
6.1 Conclusions
Contaminated soil is located behind the Moore's facility in the vicinity of the drain pipe coming out of the building. This soil is contaminated with PCE, TCE and their degradation products; 1-2,Dichloroethene and 1, I, 1-Trichloroethene, along with toluene, ethyl benzene and xylenes. The extent of soil contamination has not been determined, however, the stained soils are confined to an area of about 5 square feet. The contaminated soils are limited to the site.
14
D
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The levels of all of the contaminants found in the soils are well below any health-based benchmarks, and no schools, day care facilities, or residences are located on and within 200 feet of the contaminated soil. Based on these facts and since previous investigations have shown that the site does not pose a significant threat to human health and the environment, the soil exposure pathway is not a pathway of concern.
No release to the air pathway is suspected. No evidence of off-gassing was present during the PSI sampling event. Based on these observations and since previous investigations have shown that the site does not pose a significant threat to human health and the environment, the air pathway is not a pathway of concern.
7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSJO:SS
At some time during the operation of the site as a service station or transmission and auto repair facility, PCE and/or TCE was released from the site through a drain line installed in the service bay area of the building; These contaminants found on-site in the soil around the drain pipe exiting the Moore's facility, have migrated into the groundwater. PCE, TCE and their degradation products have been found in several private wells and a community well at levels above the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL's) set by the US EPA. An observed release of hazardous contaminants to the groundwater and the actual contamination of private wells and a community well above health-based benchmarks has been documented using US EPA CLP protocol.
Previous investigations have shown that the site is not a significant threat to human health or the environment through the surface waier, soil exposure, or air pathways.
The NC Superfund Section is recommending that the Davis Park Road TCE site proceed on with the preparation of an HRS package for the possible inclusion of this site on the National Priorities List.
15
I
I
I
m
D
D
D
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF REFERENCES FOR THE DA VIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE EPA ID NUMBER -NCD 986 175 644
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990. Hazard Ranking System; Final Rule. 55 FR 51532, December 14, 1990. ·
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1991. Superfund Chemical Matrix (SCDM). Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Directive 9345.1-13. Revised semi-annually.
3. Latitude and Longitude Coordinates Worksheets from Guidance for Performin~ Preliminazy Assessments Under CERCLA U.S.EPA Publication 9345.0-0lA September 1991 Appendix E .
4. Wallingford, El 1990 memo to file Re: Site visit notes. July 11.
5. Nicholson, Bruce. 1991 memo to.file Re: Telecon, with Roy Moore, Operator of Moore's Transmission and Auto Repair. February 18.
6. Wallingford, Ed. 1990 memo to file Re: Telecon with Carl Bell, Owner of Moore's Transmission shop Property. August 6.
7. DeRosa, Patricia. 1990 memo to file Re: TCE Well. Contamination. June 19.
8. Huff, Chris. Greenhome & O'Mara 1992 memo to Chris DeRoller, NCDHNR, Mooresville Office Re: Additional Information Regarding Moore's Transmission Shop. February 6.
9. Zinn, Harry. 1993 memo to file Re: Drainage Pipe Identification. April 26.
10. Zinn, Harry. 1993 memo to file Re: Field Notes from Off-site Recon on September 14, 1993. September 17.
11. Zinn, Harry. 1994 memo to file Re: Field Notes from Sampling Trip on January 25, 1994. January 27.
12. Syracuse Research Corporation for U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (A TSDR), "Toxicological Profile for Tetrachloroethylene" January 1990 ATSDR/TP-88/22 and "Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene" October 1989 ATSDR/TP-88/24.
13. North Carolina Geological Survey "Preliminary Explanatory Text for the 1985 Geologic Ma,p of North Carolina" November 4, 1988.
I
I
I
g
0
D
I
I
I
I
14. LeGrand, H.E. and Mundorf!, M.J., USGS "Geology and Ground Water in the Charlotte Area, North Carolina· Bulletin Number 63, February 1952.
15. Zinn, Harry. 1993 memo to file Re: Hydrology of Gastonia Area. December 23.
16. Zinn, Harry. 1994 memo to file Re: Groundwater Population for DPR TCE site. May 10.
17. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, "Census 90". . . .
18. Stanley, Jeane.tte. 1994 memo to file Re: Update on Status of Well Head Protection Programs in N.C. January 10.
19. NC Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, DEM
"Classifications and Water Quality Standards Assigned to the Waters of the Catawba River Basin" 15 NCAC 2B .0308 June 30, 1989.
20. Nicholson, Bruce. 1991 memo to file Re: Telecon with Chris Goodreau, NC Wildlife Resources Fisheries Biologist. February 18.
21. Zinn, Harry. Field Log for Sampling Trip on January 25, 1994. I 22. Zinn, Harry. 1994 memo to file Re: Private Well Data for DPR TCE site. May 11.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. ..
m T l:.Hi: tlCl' ~; ,j
1!1!!!11 1111!!1 I!!!! -== =-liiiiii liiiilll - - - - - - - - - - -
I
I
I
D
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------~ ~=£"
.=::=-= ---_-§"' ::
~
~~ ----,,; --
Hef. I
Friday
December 14, 1990
Part II
Environmental
Protection. Agency
40 CFR Part 300
Hazard R,rnking System; Final Rule
. Hef. :
Handout #8
SUPERFUND CHEMICAL DATA l\1ATRlX
I\1arch 1993
..
Het. 3 .
... ::_ .. : .. ·
-. --·-. ··-·-····-.. ·····--·-•· .... ····-·--· -··-. ··------· --· ··-·----.. . . L\':'::TuD:::· ,; ... -..::::_: Lo~;cr'!'t.::::E .CA..:.c:.1Li'i:io:; •r,'QR.".(Sr-:'EET .. /2
L: usr1:c EtlG:NEER'S SChLE (1/60)
s---J,. -:.. !:A.LS: D,.,,,, ·'PAii.i<. RcAO TCE. .SIT€ ...c:..;..;........cc..._~-'--------------C:::RCL: S /: J./CD 'l H I I S {, '-{'(
n..z;: ---------~------------SSID: ____________ _
hDDKESS: ~~7 D .. .,,,!> p,,, o<:.1; R,,,..o
Z I? CODE: 2 '7 (.) 5 L ------=-='-----
TO',.,'NS HIP: t: / S RANG c:
S::::CTION: ___ l/t. ___ !/:. ___ !/,
1-'.A? DATUH: ~ 1923 (C:RCLE ONE) P.£RIDIAN; __________ ~-------
COOR.D INATES FR0H LO',,rER R:Ci-!7 { sout!-!Er.ST) CORNER o: 7. 5. l"~P (at: 2:h-ph<?tOCC?y) :
LONGITUDE: ~o --Lll.' ~-LATITUDS: .15" o o, '
COO:lDINATES ?ROH LO~"::R F.:G~T ( SOUT~EAST) CO:=t.NER OF 2. 5' GRID CEL:.:
LONGITUDE: j'J_ 0 I "l.. '· )cl LATITUDE: .J.Lo IL ' :><l "
CALCULATIONS: LAT:TUDE
A) IWHSER o, ·?.ULER GRADLl.>.,:ONS ,?.OH LATITUDE. c;u~ LINS TO s:TE FU:? ?OINT: ill_
~) ~ULT!?!..:' (~.) 2Y C.JJC.:. TO Cot,~..SR7 70 SECOt:OS:
A X 0.3304 '(;(., .__;l,}_••
C) E:<P?...ESS IN· P.INLi7E:S AJ;~ SLCOt{DS (!'= .60"): , ~ . --22._ ..
c:;..,,_:_-::.1Lr.TIONS: :..o:;c:rTUUE:
+ O'c,9.~I ------
i ' I L__ ____________________ ~
DAVIS
j
...
l
l
l
L
ILJ
IU
IJ
~
~
II
' I
' I
I
I
--
To: File
From: Ed Wallingford, NC Superfund Section
Re: Davis Park Road TCE. Site, Gastonia, NC
kef. 4
On 11 July 1990, Mark Durway and I visited Moore's
Transmission shop located at 2307 Davis Park Road in Gastonia;
NC. The shop was investigated as a possible source of
contamination of two drinking water wells in the Davis Park·
Road area. We were accompanied by Chuck cannon, a Sanitarian
with the Gaston County Health Dept. We met with Roy Moore,
owner of the shop, who provided the following information:
the site is owned by Carl Bell of Gastonia (704/864-6681)
Mr. Bell has leased the property since 1979 or 19"80, to Mr.
Moore who runs a transmission rebuild and repair business
waste transmission fluid and oil are
55-gallon metal drums and stored on asphalt
of the property
containerized in
in the front part
-the waste transmission fluid and oil are burned for heat in
the winter
the transmission casings are cleaned with a caustic
solution; the transmission parts are cleaned in kerosene
-the property was previously used as an automobile service
station; petroleum storage tanks remain in ground and are owned
by Shell Oil/Acme Petroleum Co.
the property receives 'n"ater and sewer service from ::he
Gastonia Water and Sewer Sys::em
Mr. Moore allowed photographs to. be taken and indicated
the he would be receptive tc other questions, however, he said
that Mr. Bell should be contacted to information concerning ::he
history of the property.
tioi
I
I
Febru., 1991 ft
To: Davis Park Road TCE Site I .. · D From: Bruce Nicholson
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Subj: Telecon with
Transmissions
Gastonia, NC
Roy M,·
and ; ..
28057,
I spoke with Mr. Roy~:
: 0rator of-Moore's Automatic : ,ir, 2307 Davis Park Road, ·. '.i-717 9.
·-·ho provided the following information about the site:
He is the operator of th, owner. Mr. Bell can be r, in Charlotte. He did nc-[Afterwards, I called i:.: Bell's phone number is uc .. 2916 Burnt Mill Road, Ch,,:
Mr. Moore has operated t:. Prior to that it was a ,;, : did not have a_ny operatic:
Mr. Moore knows Don Rigg,: waste oil tank. However, Mr. Moore said it was loc,,: • he siad that he had pull0
However, Mr. Bell curren: pulling two other tanr:c:. •inches of product and ,'.· product has a paint t:, DeRoller at DEM-Mooresvi; · issued Mr. Bel 1 an NOV, 1:-•.: • "· excavating any tanks. ~:r.· site and take some sampl. r::·.
'"J Mr. Carl Bell is the site · :,rough his son Douglas Bell : •ouglas Bell's phone number : on and found that Douglas DEM lists his address as ::c 28,210-6100].
on si'te since about 1980. ,::ation of some kind, but he · :, i 1 s .
.·isited the site to sample a ·,uld riot -find the tank where ::hen they talked to Carl Bell ·~ank years ago.
contractors on site who are :·.ank reportedly has 5 to 7 :· has 3 to 4 inches. The ·. ~ke odor. · [I _called Chris :·.oti fy her of this. DEM has ~ell had not told them hj was ' she would try to visit the ..._.,,-:·ow.]
Mr. Moore also told me abc ~2ssible suspected source. He said that for as long as!:•, could remember there had been a tanker truck that was par~Gj l,1 a Chu~ch Parking Lot about a 1/4-mile south of his shop ,:.n Da·:is Park Road. The truck was from an unknown chemical company in Charlotte. He also said tl1at the parking lot shows damage he says 1s from the chemicals from the truck. He said that the truck is no longer there and that it disappeared when the news came out about the ground water contamination. [! as%ed Chris_DrRoller about this and she said that Mr. Moore had =old her this and that other sourc,;,s confirm i. t. She said she thought that Don Rigger ma'! have taken a sample in the parkicg lot. bEM has looked at tl1e parking Jot, 2nd the pavement did look cracked, but it could h,::_i\·o bc0.n fro:-1 the h1eight cl' ,the truck rather than a chemical spill.]
6
I
i
I
i
m ..,
n
::,
D
::a
D
;:.,
I ,.
I ..
I
-•
I
-"'
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i . ·.) l ' ..
6 August 1990
To: File
From: Ed Wallingford, NC Superfund Section
Re: Telecon with.Carl Bell, owner of Moore's Transmission shop property
Mr. Bell provided the following information concerning the history of the Moore's Transmission shop property:
-He bought the buildings and property approximately 30 years ago from Mr. John Birch of Gastonia, NC.
-He operated a service station until· about ten years ago, -but the station was only used for pumping gasoline. The property was also used as a service station under Mr. Birch's ownership.
-The USTs at the site were used for petroleum storage and were given to Mr. Bell by Acme Petroleum of Gastonia.
Water and Sewer service lines were connected to the establishment approximately 15 years ago.
-Water was previously obtained from a well located on property to the south of the transmission shop. The well is located on the south side of the adjacent residence.
-There has never been a septic tank. on the property; Mr. Bell is not sure if there is a drainfield.
Ref.
I
I
I
0
u
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
19 June 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FILE: Pat DeRosa, Head ~
CERCLA Branch
RE: TCE Well Contamination .
Cedar Oak Park Subdivision
Gastonia, Gaston County, NC
r contacted the following individuals today regarding the subject site:
1.
2.
. Barbara Christian, DEM, Mooresville, (704 )-663-1699
She said tJiat Ms. Chris DeRoUer, DEM -Mooresville, Grou1idwater Section had sampled soil at the transmission shop. Surface soil taken from a stainec.J area showed 1,300 ppm of a "late eluting'' chemical. The sample collected at 18" showed no VOCs or BNA's. DEM is planning tci do more work at the site to identify the source of groundwater contamination. Chris DeRoller is the primary con tact.
_Boyce Hunt, Gaston County Health Department, (704)-853-5200
He said that to date tlie primary community well at Cedar Oak Park Subdivision has been sampled rwicc (March, April 1990) anc.J has shown TCE cont:unination hoth times. The secondary well at the subdivision was sampled 011ce anc.J has not shown contamin,llion. TI1is well is currently being used by the 33 connections at the subdivision. Mr. Hunt is concerned that this low-yield well (-13 gpm) will be insufficient to supply residents throughout the summer. Water conservation hus been recommended to residents. In addition, -J2 private wells have been sampled one time each. Three show TCE > 5 ppb (EPA MCL), others· show trace or no contaminants. Reside11ts with levels 2. 5 ppb TCE have been advised not to drink the water and to avoid prolonged showering (Kc11 Rudo h~s done assessrnenl.) Residents are buying bottled water for drinking and cooki11g.
6,
Ref.
TCE Well Contamination
19 June 1990
Page 2.
Currently, the neatest water line ends -400 -500 feet north of the entrance to the
subdivision along Davis Park Road. Hook up to county water wo_uld. require
extension of this line. In addition, Mr. Hunt explained that the feeder lines to each
home would need to be replaced to meet county water specifications.
Don Rigger, EPA, ERT [phone] has indicated that EPA may be able to act
under immediate removal authority to provide either bottled water or p9ssibly a
water line extension. However, in order to trigger a removal· action, TCE
contamination must be either 1) ..2:, 128 ppb EPA action level, or 2) be increasing so
that it appears that the 128 ppb action level may be reached in the near future. This
requires repeated sampling over time.
Currently, the Gaston County Health Department is planning to sample additional
private wells in the area. I recommended that they resample the subdivision well
which has shown contamination and the private well which has shown levels of 101
ppb in an attempt to document any increase in levels. This additional sampling may
provide EPA with the information needed to engage the ERT.
3. Don Rigger, ERT EPA [phone]
Don Rigger was out of the office. I left a message.
PD/jo/lllc1nos.pd
•·
RECORD OF PHONE CONVERSATION
DATE: February 6 1 1992
INCOMING/OUTGOING (circle one)
TIME: 3:15 pm
PHONE NUMBER: /704) 663-1699
G&O REP: Christopher Huff. Environmental Engineer
TALKED WITH: Ms. Chris DeRoller. NCDHNR, Mooresville Office
G&O JOB REFERENCE: Site Investigation. Davis Park Road TCE 'Site,
Gastonia, North Carolina NCO 986 175 644·
SUBJECT: Additional Information Regarding Moore's Transmission Shop
.Asked Chris DeRoller if.the USTs were removed from Moore's
Transmission Shop. She stated that they were and that there was
no contamination from the USTs. She also stated that DEM took. a
soil sample from behind the shop where a drain pipe was found. The
results of the soil sample reviled TCE concentration of 700 ppb and
DEC of 2,000 ppb. Possible source of the ground water
_contamination. Chris also stated that when Shell Oil built the
station they tries to install a holding tank for the drain line
but when they started to dig they hit bedrock at depth of 2 feet,
so they left the pipe open to drain onto the ground. The question
of which direction the TCE plume was traveling. Chris answered
that there are actually two plumes, a TCE and a gasoline. The TCE
plume is traveling southeast and the gasoline is heading southwest.
Also, the gasoline plume is from another site near by. She Also
thinks that there are two sources cif TCE because as samples were
collected and analyzed the concentration of seem to drop off by
Skyland Drive and pick u~ towards the Cedar Oak Park well. She
will send a map showing the locations of all samples taken and
sample type. ·
G&O Representative Signature and Date:
Ref. l
I
:iEMO
DATE: April 26, 1993
TO:
FROM:
RE:
File
Harry Zlnn, Env 1 r, ,: ·· •
North Carolina c;.;•-:.
Drainage Pipe Icier.'
Gastonia, Gaston
NCD 986. 17 5 644
011 April 26, 1993 I ta>:,
of Environmental Management, c• · Tra~smission Shop. Ms. DeRol:, .. Petroleum installed service b,,.·
According to her conversa~ior, · .... · for the pipe installation, the the pipeline, however, when th,-
feet below surface level. Ne ·
· ·.,1.:neer ~
irid Section
!'or Davis Park Road TCE Site
· · ~: Carolina
Ref. ':J
·:.:·is DeRoller of the NC DEHNR Division :.he drai~age pipe located at the Moore :hat the pipe was installed when Acme shop portion of the service station. '·.:·yson Welch, the contractor responsible· ,-Lan was to install a tank at the end of ,,xcavated bedrock was encountered at .2-3 ·.-r:~r installed.
"
g
g
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
MEMO
DATE:
TO:
FRCM:
RE:
September 17, 19'-:
File
Harry Zinn, Envir:-::.~,·:·.~.al Engineer
North Carolina DE;..?::-;C;uperfund Section
Field notes from ;. •· ·. : . Trip on September 14, 1993 Davis Park Road ";-:;.: :':: ~-
Gastonia, Gaston ~-~•-~: ·:, North Carolina Nm 986 175 644 .
On September 14, 1993. c;: :·:':"r Nicholson, Doug Rumford and I. went to Gastonia, Gaston (>·.~.-·_.. NC to investigate the. possible locations of potential sourc~,· : Trichloroethylene in the southern portion of Gaston County. ·,.;.. : : :·st stopped by the Gaston County Courthouse and picked up se·:•·: ,. l "=200' . scaled rraps of the area. After obtaining these rraps ..,.. :-..:-: Craig Benedikt,. EPA Region ·rv CERCLA Project Officer for :·:.:,• area. We proceeded to perform a windshield survey of the areaf' a:·ound the Davis Park Road TCE site, the Harwell Road TCE site, a:·.:: the Forbes Road Well site. No probably sources of TCE were ;2:·.;:ed around the Davis Park Road TCE site other than the suspec: •·-: :-:-.::;re's Transmission Shop.
We later reviewed the:.::~~ of the County Fire Marshall and Emergency Management Coord1~_,'. ·_: for any records of previous spills · of TCE in the southern Gast::. >·.mty area. Again, nothing new was found for the Davis Park Rcii:..: ~:cea.
e.
Ket.
I
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
January 27, 1994
File
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer
North Carolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
Field notes from Sampling Trip on January 25, 1994 Davis Park Road TCE site
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina NCO 986 175 644
on January 25, 1994 Bob Gandley, NC Superfund section, and I went to the Davis· Park Road Site to sample soils on-site and the surrounding private wells to determine· if contamination had occurred and to what extent it may have migrated off-site. We. arrived at the site at 9:30. Mr. Roy_ Moore, owner of Moore's Automatic Transmission and Auto Repair Shop (Moore's) met with us and discussed our sampling plan. we proceeded to an area behind the shop an prepared to collect the first source sample. We used the Hnu 970165 with probe R721, calibrated at a span of 6.66. The calibration reading was 50 ppm.
We proceeded to sample in a depression area where we suspected the drain pipe terminated. After hand augering to approximately 2 1 -0 11 with no indication of any contamination, we asked Mr. Moore to verify the location of the end of the drain pipe. Mr. Moore showed us an approximately 2 11 diameter pipe coming through the wall of the shop at ground level, and projecting 3" from the wall. We relocated an collected sample DR-002-SB from 1 1 south of the pipe. The soil was oil stained to 18 11 deep .. We collected the soil sample from 18 11 to 24'' deep. The sample was collected at 10:10 and no reading was detected on the Hnu.
Sample DR-003-SB was collected 2' west of the pipe. Red sandy clay was encountered to a depth of 2011 • The sample was collected from 20 11 to 2611 depth, and again was oil stained. The sample was collected at 10:25 and no reading was detected on the Hnu.
After trying to sample 18" northwest .of the pipe and encountering rock at about 1 11 depth, Sample DR-004-SB was collected from 9'' west of the pipe. Clean looking soil was removed to a depth of 18". Oil stained soil was removed to a depth of 24" where rock was again encountered. The sample.was collected from the 18" to 24'' depth, however not enough soil was available to collect a duplicate sample. The sample was collected at 10:45 and no reading was detected on the Hnu. ··
We obtained the background soil samplei DR-001-SB, from the southeast corner of the property, approximately B" southwest of the water meter, at a depth of 6''. The sample was collected at 11:05 and no reading was detected on the HNu.
...
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/;
I
I
I
I
The residence of Mrs. Doris Corella is located at 2403 Davis
Park Road. Nobody was home at the time, however, Mrs. Corella had
given us prior approval to sample her well. Upon initial
inspection no well could be. located. We suspected that the
wellhead may be buried, since the water supply lines located in the.
crawlspace·under the house just appeared and could not be traced to
any area. We proceeded to purge the well at a tap on the southeast
corner of the house. We checked the Ph, temperature, and specific
conductivity at 5 minute intervals to determine if the groundwater
has stabilized. During the purging, we investigated an old wooden
shed located approximately 135 feet south of the house, and next to
an abandoned house. The well supplying the Corella re_sidence is
housed in this shed. A tap was located after a holding tank but
before a filter system on the line feeding the house. The.
parameters were checked on water obtained at the tap and were found·
to have. stabilized after 25 minutes of purging. A sample was
collected at 12:10.
The Cedar Oak Subdivision community well was located on the
south side of the subdivisio"n. The pump_was connected to an open
two inch line with a tap prior to the end. A four inch diameter
piece of flexible pvc piping was placed over the open end of the
pipe to carry the purge water outside the wellhouse. Mr. Doc
Thompson, Gaston County Health Department, had told us earlier in
the day that the secondary well supplying the subdivision with
water had been pumped dry the day before. When the pump was turned
on a: significant flow of water, approximately 25 to 30 gallons of
· water per minute was being discharged. Because of the fear of
pumping the well dry, we sampled the well after ten minutes of
purging, since the parameters had stabilized at this time. The
sample was collected at 12: 40 and a duplicate was collected at
12:50.
Mr. Godwin, 2231 Davis Park Road, directed us to a tap on the
northeast corner of his house.· This tap is the closest to the
wellhead that does not go through the filtering system which treats
the water used in the house. The well was purged for 15 minutes
until the parameters stabilized. The sample was collected at
14:45.
Nobody was home at the Philbeck residence, 2301 Davis Park
Road, however, Mrs. Philbeck had previously given us permission to
sample the well. A tap was located at the wellhead. The well was
purged for 10 minutes until the parameters stabilized. The sample
was collected at 15:40.
Mr. Charles May, 2419 Davis Park Road, was summoned to his
fence due to the presence of a somewhat friendly Malamute. Mr. May
introduced us to his dog and proceeded to show us to the wellhead.
A new galvanized tap had been placed between the wellhead and the
waterline running underground to the house .that morning. We purged
the well for 15 minutes until the parameters stabilized. The
sample was collected at 16:00.
I
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Orlin Tompkins, 2425 Davis Park Road, was home the second
time we attempted to sample his well. We had a lengthy discussion
concerning the contamination of the groundwater, the responsibility
of the former owner to inform Mr. Tompkins about the contamination,
and several other matters. Mr. Tompkins then proceeded to show us
an accumulation of what appeared to be blue green algae growing in
the tank on his toilet. Mr. Tompkins requested that we take a
sample of his water inside the house at his sink tap as well as a
sample outside at the wellhead. I informed Mr. Tompkins that we
are limited to the number of samples authorized on the approved
sampling plan, however, I would recommend to the NC DEM and the·
Gaston county Health Department that this sampling could be done by
them. We proceeded to the wellhead in• the back yard. The
parameters stabilized after 15 minutes, and we collected the·sample
at 16:50.
...
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
Date Published -January I 990 ·
Prepared by:
Syracuse Research Corporation
under Contract No. 68-CB-0004
for
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTII & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATS DR)
in collaboration with
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Technical editing/document preparation by:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
under
DOE lnteragency Agreement No. I 857-B026-A I
..,
tU·:t. h
ATSDR/TP-88/22
0
I
I
Environmental Fate 71
the vapo_r phase in the ambient ,t~ m,,. .. ,t•here and not partition to
atmospheric particulates. Si pd t : , ,.:.: evaporation from dry surfaces can
also be predicted from· the hi,.t, v,,;'"" pressure.
Experimentally measured hic,co:,,,•ntration factors (BCF) for
tetrachloroethylene· in fish hav.-h,·,•:, found to range from 39 to 49
(Barrows et al. 1980, Neely et al 1•74, Veith et al. 1980, Kenaga
1980). Two Japanese studies h,w• a:"' found tetrachloroethylene to have
low bioaccumulation potential I Sa,.,,: 1978, Kawasaki 1980). · Monitoring
tetrachloroethylene concentrat inn~ ir: seawater an_d associated aquatic
organisms is in agreement wit L ! ti .. t-,;ierimental BCF data (Pearson and
McConnell 1975, Dickson and R1 :,·.-: • ·,).
6. 3. 2 Transformation and Degradat 1,,n
The dominant transforma: ,,,,. ;-: ,·ss for tet~achloroethylene in the
atmosphere is expected to be n.,, 1 •, .: t of reaction with photochemi~ally
pro_duced hydroxyl radicals (Si:c,•. ,.• al. 1982). Using the recommended
rate constant for this reactio1 10·13 cm3/(molecule-s) and a
typical atmospheric hydroxyl r«•.t:,,, concentration or" 5 x 105
molecules/cm3 (Atkinson 198) · '1,. · ... : f -life is -96 days. The
degradation products of this rt·• ':,: include phosgene and
chloroacetylchlorides (Singh,, .• : :>75). R~a6tion of
tetrachloroethylene with ozone 1, :!.• atm6~phere is too slow to be
environmentally important (A:r.ir,'"' and Carter 1984). The predicted
degradation half-lives of te:rart,:r:oethylene in the atmosphere indicate
that long-range global trans1,o,· ', : ikely (Class and Ballschmiter
1986). Indeed, monitoring da:" :,,,·:, Jomonstrated that
tetrachloroethylene is preser:: ::. :!:e atmosphere worldwide and at
locations far removed from a~1:!:": '·'i"' !~_<·nic emission sources (see Sect. 7,
Potential for Human Exposure·
In natural water and soil ,vi:•~•. biodegradation and hydrolysis
may_ be the most important tf"'. r,11·!1!1·:-oethylene transformation processes,
although neither process apt1t..,.1:·•, :. r occur rapidly in the environment.
Various biodegradation scree-:·.:::•·· : t· sts and laboratory studies have found
tetrachloroethylene to be rt·s' sc: .,::: or ·only biodegraded slowly (Bouwer
et al. 1981, Bouwer and McCar:·: l'•c .. '., Mudder and Musterman 1982, Sasaki
1978, Wakeham et al. 1983, ·.·i ls«n e: al. 1983a). Other screening studies
have noted mor~ rapid biodegradRtio11; however, appropriate inocula and
microbial adaptations are necessary (Tabak et al. 1981; Parsons et al.
1984, 1985). The hydrolysis h~lf-life of tetrachloroethylene in water at
room temperature is -9 months (Dilling et al. 1975).
Since neither biodegradation nor hydrolysis occurs at a rapid race,
most tetrachloroethylene present in surface waters can be expected to
volatilize into the atmosphere. Volatilization will not, however, be a
viable process for much of the tetrachloroethylene transported into
groundwaters by leaching. There is evidence that slow biodegradation of
tetrachloroethylene occurs under anaerobic conditions with acclimated
microorganisms (Bouwer and McCarty 1984, Wilson et al. 1983b),
suggesting that a slow degradation process (ot biodegradation and
hydrolysis) may occur in subsurface environmental regions. In regions
where volatilization is not viable, tetrachloroethylene may be
relatively persistent.
...
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR
TRICHLOROETHYLEJ'.'IE
Date Published -October 1989
Prepared by:
Syracuse Research Corporation
under Contract No. 68-CS-0004
for
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (A TSDR)
U.S. Public Health Service
in collaboration with
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Techflical editing/document preparation by:
Oak Ridge Nation"I Laboratory
under
DOE lnteragency Agreement No. 1857-B026-AI
ATSDR/TP-88/24
ft .,•:
'r
D
u
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
£nviro;1r.1~11.tal Far.e 91
6.3.2 Transformation and Degradation
The atmosphere is the primary recipient of envirohrnental releases of trichloroethylene. The dominant transformation process for trichloroethylene .in the atmosphere is reaction· with sunlight-produced hydroxyl radicals (Singh et al. 1982). Using the recommended rate constant for this reaction.at 25"C (2.36 x 1012 cm 3/molecule-s) and a typical atmospheric hydroxyl radical concentration (5 x 105 molecules/cm3) (Atkinson 1985), the half-life can be estimated to be 6.8 days. The degradation products of this reaction include phosgene, dichloroacetyl chloride, and formyl chloride (Atkinson_ 1985, HSDB 1987). Reaction of trichloroethylene with ozone iri the atmosphere is too slow to be environmentally significant (Atkinson and Carter 1984). Direct photolysis of_trichloroethylene is also not sigriifi~ant (Callahan ~t al. 1979, Mabey et al. 1981). Although relatively low concentrations of trichloroethylene have been detected in remote global regions (Sect. 7, Potential for Human Exposure), the relatively short half-life of trichloroethylene in air should not permit long~range global transport of significant levels of trichloroethylene (Class and Ballschmiter 1986).
In natural water and soil .systems, biodegradation may be the most important trichloroethylene transformation process, although it does not appear to occur rapidly on an environmental level. Various aerobic (Jensen and Rosenberg 1975, Rott et al. 1982, Wakeham et al. 1983) and anaerobic (Wilson et al. 1983a,b, 1986; Rott et al. 1982) biodegradation screening studies found trichloroethylene to be resistant or only slowly biodegraded. Other aerobic (Tabak et al. 1981, Wilson and Wilson 1985) and anaerobic (Parsons et al. 1984, 1985) screening studies noted more rapid biodegradation; however, appropriate· inocula and adaptation were required. The biodegradation products from trichloroethylene are dichloroethylene and vinyl chloride (Smith and Dragun 1984). Hydrolysis, oxidation, and direct photolysis are not environmentally important processes for trichloroethylene in water (Callahan et al. 1979, Mabey·et al. 1981).
Because neither biodegradation nor other fate processes occur at a rapid rate, most trichloroethylene present in surface waters can be expected to volatilize into the atmosphere. Volatilization will not, however, be a viable process for much of the trichloroethylene t~ansported into groundwater by leaching. There is evidence that slow biodegradation of trichloroethylene occurs under anaerobic conditions (Barrio-Lage et al. 1987, Hallen et al. 1986, Wilson et al. 1986, Fogel et al. 1986, Vogel and McCarty 1985), suggesting that a slow biodegradat~on process may occur in subsurface environmental regions. In regions where volatilization is not viable, trichloroethylene may be relatively persistent.
B
u
m-
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
PRELIMINARY EXPLANATORY TEXT FOR THE 1985 GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTH CAROLINA
/'
Contractual Report 88-1
by
The North Carolina Geological Survey
November 4, 1988
e,
'et. IJ.
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Pl EDMON'J'
Overview
The Piedmont is an inclined plain characterized by gently rolling topography. The effects of lithology and rock structure on topography are mostly subtle. Noticeable· effects include ridges underlain by hard rock such as Abner Mountain in Montgomery County and distinctive stream patterns such as that in western Stanly County. The rocks of the Piedmont are, for the roost part, metamorphosed and deeply weathered. Outcrops are most common in stream bottoms and on the steeper slopes an·d, conversely, deep weathering is most common on the uplands. In many locales, the thickness of weathered material can vary greatly over a few tens of feet. Some rock types, such as argillite in the Carolina Slate belt are not deeply weathered which results in shallow soil and saprolite, but no one has sys.tematicly studied_ the relationship between rock types and thickness of weathered material. ·
!Ung (1955) subdivided the Piedrnbnt into belts on the basis of lithologies •and structure. Subsequent authors found it useful to continue King's scheme, adopting additional belts into general use. On the legend of the 1985 Geologic Map -of North Carolina, belts of the Piedmont are grouped as follows: Kings Mountain belt; Inner Piedmont belt, Chauga belt, .Smith River al]ochthon, and Sauratown Mountains anticlinoriu.m; 8harlotte and Milton belts; Carolina Slate belt; Raleigh belt; and Eastern Slate belt. Some pervasive metamorphic, tectonic, or plutonic· events were imposed across several belts. For example, groups of intrusions of similar age and tectonic history may have individual bodies scattet-ed throughout the belts and a particular belt may contain igneous intrusive bodies from several age groups ( see Fullagar, 1971).-
The Kings Mountain Belt
The Kings Mountain belt was defined by King (1955). This belt has been much ·studied because of its variety of rock types and its mineral wealtn. Important early work includes Keith and Sterrett (1931) and Kesler (1944). Kesler (1955) wrote a brief summary of the Kings Mountain belt. Overstreet and Bell (1965) described the rocks of the Kings Mountain belt in I South Carolina in detail. More recently, Horton, Butler, and Milton (1981) edited a guidebook for the Carolina Geological Society that represented the roost complete coverage of the belt up to that time.
I
I
The Kings Mountain belt is a sequence of metasedimentary and metavolcanic rock of generally lower metamorphic grade than the bordering Inner Piedmont and Charlotte Belt. In contrast to the Inner Piedmont belt 2nd the Charlotte belt, the stratigraphy is relatively well known. Th.is is Di:cause of the nature of the rocks and the intense study they ha_ve received. I Zbt BATTLEGROUND FORMATION
The following description was condensed from Horton (1983). The unit I is d.ivided into lower part and upper part. The lower part is meta volcanic, r;;ostly daci tic to andesitic rocks ( hornblende gneiss, f eldspathic bioti te, sneiss, and phyllitic to schistose volcaniclastic rocks) interlayered with and frad.ing laterulJy and upward to quartz-sericite schist. The upper part I consists of quartz-sericite schist, kyan.ite and silliman.ite quartzite, c,uartz-pebble metaconglomerate (at least th!'€{' beds of rnetaconglomerate are
I C'
;
I
/ I .
i
I.
I
I
I
I i
I I I I;
I! I.
d
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
piedmont as weU as the King:; ,· .. •.: lidi.
ppmg FOLIATED.TO MASSIVE ,:;,:,.::1c ROCK
This map unit occurs in th• :1:h belt and the Eastern Slate belt as we LI as the Kings Mountain b,·,· i 11cludes the H.igh Shoals, Rolesville, Wise, Lemon Springs, Butters,,'· '· r·cek, and Rocky Mount granites. Goldsmith and others (1988) <!,·:. ,-,1 .. ,d the High Shoals granite as a coarse-grained, porphyritic, well·f, ;,., .. ,; biotite granite. A review of other papers that include description~. ,.: · :.,· or more of these bodies shows that some of the -rock bodies are co,r.; .. , .. : • ,: several intrusive phases exhibiting cross-cutting relationships and ,!:::, r.:.,: in texture and degree of foliation. The rocks are megacrystic to cc;<:q:r.,,.·,Llr granite to quartz monzonite. For more information see Parker I I::·;·. '.I peer and others ( 1980), Campbell (1985), and Bolton (1985).
Jd .DIABASE
Burt and others ( 1978) con:1 !;, < ns;ip of this ·rock type that illustrates its wide distribution throughou i • !.• ! · 1,·dmont and Triassic basins. They described it as dark-gray to gre,·r.:: ! · ::i:ir-k, fine-• to medium-grained material with plagioclase, augite, and oli·:,n, :, the primary minerals. Ragland and others (1983) reported tilat a ~c;b.",r,::r,ate number of dikes contain quartz instead of olivine. This rock :y; .. · ,·,:urs as thin sheet-like bodies most co=only steeply dipping c~ ·:,·r'. :roll and cross-cutting but rarely sub-horizontal especially in the >,rt.:u,·. area. For further description of diabase see the section on Trias::.:: : .. c 111:;. Some diabase dikes and adjacent fractured rocks are conduits for th,· m ,vPment of groundwater.
Inner Piedmont Belt, Cb.au1:,1 H,,lt, Smith River Allochthon, and Sauratown Mouritiun,; Anticlinorium
The Inner Piedmont belt . v.·;,: ,:,•,:rribed by Overstreet and Griffitts (1955). Overstreet and Bell ( J3f' :, J .: h\ished a detailed description of the Inn'er · Piedmont belt of South Car,Jl:,:.1 that is· somewhat applicable to North Carolina. Griffin ( 1971) further d,•,;<.:r: LH,d the Inner Piedmont belt, especially of South Carolina, with e·mphasi.s on :: I :-u cture and tectonics. In spite of the earlier work, Butler (1972) felt that the geology of tile Inner Piedmont belt was poorly known. The work of Gold'.:rr:ith and otilers (1988) on tile Charlotte 1 ° x 2° sheet added significantly to what we know about the Inner Piedmont belt, but Butler's (1972) opinion· is still valid. This Jack of detailed understanding of the Inner Piedmont belt is . related to complexity of the structure, lack of recognizable primarily stratigraphic features, lack of cUstincUve marker beds, deep weathering, and, not least, Jack of a strong economic impetus to study the rocks. Goldsmith and others ( 1988) gave a detailed summary of the Inner Piedmont belt. Many of the significant points of their summary are condensed in the following paragraph.
The stratified rocks are predominantly th.inly layered mica schist and gneiss. These are interlayered with arnphibolite, calc-silicate rock, hor,, blende gneiss, quartzj te and rare marble. TherB are two straUg-raph.ic suites, a predominantly mafic lower suite which occupies the flan.ks of the Inner Piedmont belt and the upper suite of interlayered mica schist, bioUte Pare gneiss, and minor calc-silicate rock which occupies the core. With rPspect to metamo11)hic grade, the core is characterized by sillimanite-muscovite and the ncnks by staurolite-kyanite. Many rnass~s o!'
a
D
n·
O'
0
D
1:
o:
I
I
I · ...
I
1:
I
NORTH CAROLI NA
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT •·,
GEORGE R. ROSS, DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES
JASPER L. STUCK,EY, STATE_ GEOLOGIST.
i GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER
IN THE
Charlotte_ Area, North'c!Carolina .·-::,. >: .... -:~·-~--· .. -... -· ': ,_::-.'..:_ .. · .... :· ·. :-
BY
H. E. LEGRAND AND M. J. MUNDORFF
1952
Ref. 1'
ai
gl
IP
• I
I
If
-
GEOLOGY AND GRot.::--;o WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLI!'-,\ 47
· GASTON COUNTY
(Area, 35S square miles; population in 1950, 110,S36)
Gcngrn11hy 111111 J>hysio!!'ra11hy,-Gaston County lies In the· south-central part of the Charlotte area.
Gastonia, with a population of 23,003, is the largest municipality ant! the county seat. Textile manufac-
turing is the largest int!ustry in the county although there is considerable farming activity. The couuty is
well served by railroads and paved roads.
Gaston County is a rolling upland portion of the Piedmont province, the general altl_tude being slight-
ly more than S00 feet. Some of the streams have inciset! their valleys as much as 2b0 feet below the up-
land, and as a result the topography near the streams is quite hilly. ·Rising several hundred feet above the
. general level of the country are se,·eral pronounced northeast trending ridges, all of which are composed
o( resistant quartzite. Prominent among these are Kings Mountain Pinnacle, Crowders Mountain, and
Spencer Mountain.
The county is drained by Catawba River, which flows south. along the east boundary. The main tribu-·
taries of the Catawba flow southeastward across the general trend of the rocks and for the most part are
not noticeably influenced by any differential 1'esistance of rocks. to erosion. The tributaries are closely
spaced, resulting in a fine-textured drainage pattern and the absence of extensive, flat interstream areas.
With the exception of South Fork Catawba River, the streams have fairly short steep courses, and conse-
quently are rather swift.
Geology.-;-.;umerous types of rocks occur in Gaston County (fig. 13). and their relations one with an-
othe_r are complex. The general northeast schistose structure prevails so that rocks of eastern Cleveland
County extend northeastward into the western part of Gaston.-
. Mica schist forms the dominant host rock into which the granite was injected in Gaston County. Nat-
urally enough, the granite did not intrude the schist_ evenly and in a few areas granite is either scant or ab-
sent" in the schist. The belt of schist 2 miles east of Gastonia and parts of the schist near Kings Mountain
Pinnacle and Crowders Mountain contain very little granite. Muscovite or sericite, and quartz are generally
the chief components of the schist although manganese anc\ chlorite are not uncommon.
Composite rocks in which mica schist and granite are interlayered, generally in northeast trending
belts, are widespread in the western two-thirds of the county. The largest belt in which the schist is pre-
dominant surrounds Kings Mountain Pinnacle and extends through the western· side of Bessemer City to
High Shoals in the northern part of the county. The schist is subordinate in quantity to the granite in the
area between Dallas and Stanley and along the Cleveland County line southeast of Cherryville.
Several masses or belts of homogeneous or nearly homogeneous granite occur in Gaston County. The
largest of these extends northward from the basin of S_outh Crowders Creek at the South Carolina line,
through Gastonia to Lincoln County east of High Shoals. One finger of this mass extends southwestward
to Bessemer City where it is the type locality for Keith's Bessemer granite." Another large mass of gran-
ite occurs southeast of Cherryville.
The granites are not uni(orm in appearance and mineral constituents. The granite at Bessemer City
is locally more gneissic and contains more biotite than most of the granite in the county. The granites for
the most part have a light color and medium texture, although small bodies within the com9lex proper are
coarse textured and may be called pegmatite. ·
Gneisses and schists, containing hornblende as a prominent dark mineral, are common in Gaston Coun-
ty. In addition to the numerous lenses of hornblendic rocks inter!ayered with other country rocks, several
large areas of hornblende gneiss occur. One of these, in the vicinity of Beaverdam Creek in the northwest-
ern part of the county, has been studied in some detail.'• Soils derived from the hornblende gneiss are gen-
erally dark brown or red in color and are more fertile than those from other rocks.
A composite rock in which diorite and granite appear as intermixed bodies occurs in a general north-
south belt along the eastern border of the county. This belt extends eastward into Mecklenburg County
::r.Keith, Arthur, op. cit.. p. 4.
:,,Kesler. T. L., Correlation of some metamorphic rocks in the central Carolina Piedmont: Geol. Soc. or America Bull.. vol. 55.
p. 773. 194-4.
-.. I!!!!!!! l!!!!!!!I I!!!!!
[ZEJ
~
D
E"..J
li0,l
D
Qii_]
[lfil@
□
ii!]
~
EXPLANATION
Mica lthiit ind ar,nile
"""' p1,do,n,n1nt
Gran,1t and mica schisl
1,,,,,1, p,rdomin•nt
G,1n,1e
0.0 .. 1, and 111nile
"'°"u p,,dom,n1n1
G11nile and diorile 11on,1• p,rdom.<Unl
llon,bl,ndf 11n,/is Ind 1•1ni1, ,,.,,,11,n
Hornbtu-,d, 1ntin
Gabb•o d1011le ,,.., ,n,,d bu"[ •oc•,
Qua,tllle
A,,.,,,.,,,.,,1 ol .,n,11. ,.,,, ,bo,, !"• 01h.,_ .,,.,, not ,nJ,<•I• <h•onol~r,..•I u,1,,,n,r An .,,.,h ••• P,1,0100< ••• or old,,. C.,o101,c t>ou<><l•"n ••• 1pp,o""''"·
!!!!!! I!!!!
• b
I!!! ==
GEOLOGIC MAP
OF
GASTON COUNTY
SCALE.
IIIIIUS
FIGUHE ]:!.-GEOLOGIC ~IAr OF GASTON COUNTY.
== -ro
C)
"" 0 g ..,
► z
" C)
~ C: 7. " ::: > .....
"' "'
z 0 "' .... ;,:
("') ,.
"' 0 !: z ,.
I
llt
I
Ill
Ill
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA 49
where it is of gieater prominence. The i·o.cks of the complex are not well exposed, :ind as a consequence
their relation with adjacent rocks to the West is not certain. In this connection, a zone of diorite and diorite
gneiss extending northeastward through Lowell is adjacent to the complex and may be genetically ·related
to it. South of Mt. Holly the amount of granite appears to be subordinate to diorite but northward the dio-
rite is subordinate in amount. Pronounced granular disintegration is characteristic of both components of
the complex in the Charlotte area.
Several northeast-trending belts of quartzite occur in the central part of Gaston County. The ridges
that they form by their resistance to erosion serve to show the broad structural trends of the rocks. In the
area south of Crowders Mountain, Keith"1 has noted three divisions ·of the quartzite, namely. kyanite quartz-
ite, white, nearly pure quartzite, chloritic quartzite, and seritic quartzite. The beds of quartzite are con-
sidered to.· be of the same general age, but the relation of one with another is not clear. ·
Ground Wnter.-Most of. the domestic water supplies, many o! the industrial supplies,' and twci of the
municipal supplies In Gaston County are obtained from wells (fig. 14). lllost or the·water.ln rurai'·sec-
tions comes from dug wells that derive water from the weathered and disintegrated zone between the soil ·
and the underlying unweathered rock. Where the unweathered rock lies near. the surface difficulty may
arise in digging a well deep enough to obtain 'a dependable we1I. The failure of dug wells is not con.fined
to any one rock type although attempts to dig wells on upland areas underlain by quartzite are likely to
be unsuccessful.
Records of more than 200 drilled wells are included in the table of well data. The records or 151 wells.
were complete enough for use in·compiling table 11 below.
TADLE 11.-SU?iO.t,\nY OF DATA o::-. WELLS IN GASTOX COUNTY
(Drilled wells 3 inches or more in diameter)
ACCORDING TO ROCK TYPE
Yield <r•IIDIU • minute)
N'um~r of Average
Trn or Roe, .,u, Jcplh ~ i (feet) Average Per foot
' of •tll ' I I
'
Schill ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• " 180 i 0-150 " ! . 13
Gunilt ••••••••.•••••....••••••..•. " 1'5 I 0-100 I 18 I .\\
,11 .. 11, ......................... 1~ 172 I 0-llO ./ :.!\
ACCORDING TO TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION
I Yield (1~Uon1 ~ minul,)
:,;um~r of Av~u~e I
TOl'OOIU!'HIC LOCUIOI< .,u, <l,pth
I~
I
{f~\) Pn foot
I ,\nr&ce nf ••ll
HiU .. , ............................ 1 " 1'3 I ,_" ··11 .07
Flat.--·· .•..••••.•. ···········----8 H3 I ,_" I IS • \J
Slope .•.••••••.....••..•••••.•••... H 191 i 1-150 ~ . 13
Dr••····-··-·-···············-··--" li9 I~" I
. \l
V11ky ••••••••••••. • ••••••• --•. •.• •• ·l ' l<l i ,_,, 1' I . 10
:-:Keith. Arthur. op. cit., (folio 2:?2) p, 5.
Pcrttfll of wdb
yitlJin11; I p!lon
a minute or
"'· ;
' ' I '
i '
! rnN'nt of •rll.3 I yieldin( I 11llon
I • m:nutt or ..... I
I
I ;
0
'
0
"
-- ---.... -
MAP OF
GASTON COUNTY
SHOWING LOCATION OF WELLS
-
\
I ~,
' I
I
0
--111!!1
r•
-.-.•
•' I •• • • •--'• ,..._ r
.:• .....
.110
. Mtl[S
'
FIGURE 14.-1\IAP OF GASTON COUNTY SHOWING LOC,\TION. OF WELLS
==
"" 0
0 "" 0
S C> "' > 7.
t;;l
0
"' 0
C: z
t;;l
::;
► ....
"' ,.,
' u
I
I
I
l
-I
-I
I
i
i
I
i
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA 51
Although the wells in table 11 were. drilled in schist and granite, some of the wells probably. penetrat-ed other types of rocks also. As the spacing between the dif!erent rocks can be measured in terms of feet and inches it is inevitable that many wells pass through rocks _other than that indicated at the top of the well. The schist is composed of muscovite and quartz In most places, but it may contain beds of horn-lJlende gneiss and schist, pegmatites, and other rocks.
Table 11 Indicates that the average depth of wells In schist Is 180 feet and that the average yjeld is ~3 gallons a minute; this con1pares with an average depth of 165 feet in granite and an average yield of IS gallons a minute. If average yield per foot of well is ·consider~d. the water-yielding characteristics of the schist is only slightly greater than that of granite. The average yield of wells in. both schist anci granite is 21 gallons a minute, which is 4 gallons a minute higher than the average for _all wells in the Charlotte area. It ls not certain that the higher yield of wells in Gaston County ls significant because the same general geology and topography occur-also in Lincoln _and Cleveland Counties.
The part of table 11 showing the relation of average yield and average yield per foot of well to the topography is significant. Wells located on hills have by far the smallest average yield and average yield/ per foot of well. In addition 7 percent of the wells on. hills in the county yield 1 gallon a minute or Jess. As is the case in the Charlotte area as a whole, "the wells on hill$ yield only about half as much water per foot of well as wells in draws. ·
Analyses of samples of water from nine wells and one spring in Gaston County are given· in a table following the well records. All but. well 97 penetrated schist or granite or both schist and granite. Well 97 penetrated both granite and diorite. The water ranged in hardness from 26 to 158 parts per million. The iron content ranged from 0.08 to 8.6 parts per million. Water from different wells in the towns of Cherryville and Stanley showed a considerable local variation-in content of iron.
Analysis of water from one spring is shown in the table. This water contained only 59 parts per mil-lion of dissolved solids, despite the fact that it flows from hornblende gneiss, one of the most readily soluble rocks of the Charlotte area. The low mineral content of this spring water is thought to be typical ina~mucb as water from springs normally flows through the rocks more rapidly than water from wells.
Temperatures of waters ranged from 60' to 66' F. and averaged 62" F. The water having a tempera-_ture of 66' F. is pumped from a well 1,053 feet deep.
There are two municipally owned ground-water supplies in Gaston County; in addition the town of McAdenville is supplied with water from a well awned and operated by a mill.
Cherryville, population 3,486, obtains its water from eight wells in various parts of the town. All the wells penetrate granite. The wells range from 132 to 238 feet in depth and from 10 to 75 gallons a min-ute in yield. Six of the wells yield approximately 20 gallons a minute each. The chemical quality of the water is good. The total dissolved solids of the water from any of the wells does not exceed 115 parts per million. The water receives no regular· treatment.
Stanley. population 1,645, obtains its supply from four wells. Three of the wells are at least 350 feet deep. They vary in yield from 15 to 45 gallons a minute. The water from the four wells contains more than the average amount of mineral matter for all wells in the county and is slightly hard; the water from well 1·0 contained 4.9 parts per million of iron on November 20, 1947. The water is not treated.
McAdenville, population 1.059, is supplied with water from a well owned by Stowe Mills, Inc. The well. 132, is 523 feet deep and yields in excess of 100 gallons a minute. A field test showed the water had a total hardness of 230 parts per million. The water is not treated.
I 52 GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
D
D
D
D
I
I
I
i
I
Loc.i.no11 DIIILUII Tyr,t of .. ,
A mila NE. ot Mount Holl1 •••• Duke P~•er Co .•••••• H. L Laur ..••.•••. Cr-Dr
•••• do ................. · .......... do ••••• · •••••••••••••• do.· ••• · •••.•.•• Ct-Dr
.••• do .••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do .••••••••••••••••••• do .•••••.••••••• Cr-Orr Lucia. I mile. N. ol Mowii.
HoU,. •••••••••••••••••••••• Mn. W.T.Beatty •••• JufiusHqtr •••••••• Cr-Dr
•••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••• J.A.Mdntoab .•..•••••••••.•••••••••••••• rhic •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••• l\". C. Mclal.olb ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• D111
stau, ............ L ••••••••• G. K. Derr ••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••• Cr-Dr I •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••• H. C. Mut1,o ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Cr-Dr
. •••. do_ ••••••••••••••• ~-•••••• Tolrll •••••••••••.•.•• Va. Ma~h. Co .•••••• Dr
10 : ••• do ••••••••••••••••••.••• --__ ._do.•·--·---------· ..•. do .•••• ••-···-·· Dr
·11 ._ •• do.-•••••••••••••••• · ••••••••• do .................... do •••••.•••••••• Dr
Ila •••• do._ •••••••••••••••••••••••••• do .••••••••••••••.••••••••.••••..••••• Dr
12 •••• do........................ Lola Milli, l11c... ••• •• •••••••••• •••• •• •••• Dr
13 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do................ • .• . •• ••• . •••••••••. Dr H AluUI, 3 .11:Ula Nlr oL ••••.••• B.D.Bn.dalaw ••••••• ·······-············ Dr
U 2 miler SE. ofHlcbShWl •••••• Hardi.a Mfc. Co .•••••• ···················-Dr
II BichShCIUI •••••••••••••••••• Catolinia11Mill •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Dr
1~·· •••• do .•.••••••.••••..•...••.••••• do .••••••••••••••• R. E. r, •.......... Dr
11 •••• do .•••••••••.•.••.•.••.••. -••. do .••••••••••••••• ··············-····· •••.•.•• Ill. 2 mile. W. of Hieb Sboall •••••• P.A. Kia« .•.•••••••. Va. Mach. Co .•••••• Due-Dr 20 2¾ mile. W, of Hich Sboa.11 •••• Mn. M, A. Carput.er •••••• do .••••••••••••• Dr 21 t mila W, of Hieb Sboall ••.••• A. M. ~r ••• ••••••• Robbio.1............ Dr
22 .••• ~o ..••••••.•••••••.•.•••.• D. C. ~r ..••••••••...•. do .••••••••••••• Dr
23 4½ mile. W. or Hich Sb0&t. ••.• forn,at Da.lliocer-••.•...•• do···-·--······· Dr 2~ lmiiul\'.ofHicbSboal.t •••••• W.E.IGKr •••••••••••••• do .•.•••..••..• _ Dr :!5 t miW'I SW. of Ri,:b Sb011ll ••••• A. L Batbtt .• _., .•... Rollbiiu ..•.•••••.•• Dr 2G 6 mila E. of Cburr-,illt ••••••. r. r. Alkn •..•••••••.•••• do .• _ .•....•.... Dr 27 "t½ fWlet E. ol Cbeny,illt ••.•• G. A. Bt.ll •••••••••••• ······-············· Due
28 •••• do ..•••• ••···········-···· G. W. Ba.m.-•••.•••• Robbw •••••••••••• Cr-Dr 211 J½ m.ikl E. of Cbmy-rillt... •. B. R. litam ..••• _..... Hickory Pump Co... Dr 30 4miletE.oICbtrl'}'Yilk ..•.... S.C.C.rpentcr •.•••.. Coll'ttT ••••.•••••• ~. Cr-Dr
3! ..•. do .....•...... -•.......... D. Jf. C1rpe11ttr .••.•.. Cootnu ol: Dn-UI •••• Cr-Dr " J mila, E. of Chnrrvillc .•.•••• Mni. 'itroa P1yao11r ••...•••••••.•••••••••• Cr-Dr
l•mfiMl!-1l!-4A4iM6lii-
"'
305
"
" ,. ..
130
350 ...
350
,oo
70
'"
"'
'"
100
160
'" "
"
IOS½
,0
128
1'3
31
80
121 ..
n5
100
m
" I 18
300
170
1001
200±
I o;..,,.., II>tptll o/ Wata ln-d ol •fll CM.111 (lcc-t btlow Yield (iadla} (ftt,) Mlrlaor) (c.p.m..)
•
" 18
• I
•
•
•
• •
...
8
76+ ••••••••••
20+ ··---····-
" "
JO
......... · ---·····
.. "
"
,0
...
&-IO
IO
"
"
"
21
H
•
"
30
"
•••••••••• ··-·· •• • 20--15 120± M H e 60 10-U
6 6/8 •••••..•..•••••.•..••.•.••
71 • •• • • •• •• • 30-40
Tot&J hard-
._ (fi,lit
tall)
(p.p.m.)
80
..
"
..
..
'°
"
ll0
"
"
'°
"
"
66/8 .•••..••••••••••.• 6 ••••.•••••••
5 5/8 ••••..•• -········· ,--s 30 ,5 a/I;........ ..•..••... 10 50 ' '''i········ .... ······ .: ...... -·· ........ . 48 1........ 24 Mlt-
•
1 q1,11lt 20
1•••••••• 40 I ·-·········· JOO 45 60
30
1, I ........... .
MJ,. l
Qua1' I .so 5 5;L....... ..... ..... 10 i t0
6 \::::::::i::::::::::1 2~~ l1·····~~ ..... .s .s,s; ........ ·-··· ..... . .s .s1sj········ .......... 2~30 I 55
i··:···· ··········
1:::::::::::::::\ " " " " 20 " " 1--·······-··
,.Ji.i££.?2 V
R111u11
Granite. Well at trlltr I.Ink. n.1 .
GrMit.. Well at oomm-..ry.
Bio,-.
Not IIICld.
Supplia ••tu to khoo1, la,m
aad home. Grsnite. Orn.
Grsaite, Slope.
Gl'Wte.. Good yitlJ reporltd. Hill.
Gn.llile.. Hill.
Granite. At one time 111pplie,d
J3 familiaaad 1nrral1tom
[>, ...
152°-' F. Granite. Analy1ia.
Well ii at t&ak. Hill.
U}i" F. On.nit.e. Analy1i.a .
Well ii ont-lourth milt north
oft..nk. Hill. u½" r. oram1e. Ana.JYIU.
Well ii BW. of to•a. Hill.
GrllUt~ Pumpaetti.a1 al 150 • CMt: dtndolrll n.pid but Mld at :0 ,.p..m. at 150 loot
1etlq:, Slope •
Oruik Well at ttwrToir. run.
Dy. liiCIUlt •·dl Hill.
Schilt. Formcrl1uledby11••
mill: Iara:, yidd ttportrd.
Slo,-.
GRllilr. Uao 6 h.p. pump,
V&lky.
Gr&.11ite. Uat I h.p. pump. ""·· Sclaiat. Ute 10 b.p. pump.
Slope.
GrsJ1i1'. Y,Uey.
Due 81 fl .. il•ili«I K.
Hill.
Schiat. Good yitld uporttd.
Slop,.
00° F. Schill. C-ould DOI
lower .. 1"-1evtl witb
~-Flat.
Scb.i.Jt. Hill
Hill.
Slope.
Hill.
Slo,-.
Hill.
Wal.fr rtpo,t«f toft. with DO
i.rOD, Hill.
Water reported ,oft. Slope,
Slope.
Hill.
HiU.
Wt!l 1uflplia 1i1 holllet. SloJ>t.
We.JI by •uh boWJt. Dru.
61½° F. Wtll at we:.l r11d of
•111' bo\11111'. Dra•.
Dn•-e1,(' r. Dni•. eJ,{° r. Draw.
G2¾° F. Dr-1•.
IJJl41. •
q
I
I
I
di
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I:
I
I
I
'
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
Rt:CORO::i ot·. WELLS IX GAtiTOX CuniTY-Co11tinueff
l\'rll
"·
Ow11r.a D•ILLll Type oC .• ,n
a Chnry-tiU, ••••••••••••••••••• Dora Yarn ~liU. •••••• Ralph Rohbint •••••• Dr
421 •••• Jo .••••...••.•.•••.••••••••••. do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Dr
~:J •.•• Jo •••••••••••••••••••••••• Town •••••••••••••••• Ltt .•..•••••.•••••• Dr
H •••• Jo ..••.•..••.•••.••••••••..••. do ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• · •• Dr
45 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0 ••••• Dr
~IS •••• Jo .•.••...•..•...••••.••...••• do .••••••••••••••• LN ••••••••••••••••••••••••
◄i .... Jo •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
◄ 8 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••••••.•• Robbina .••••••••••••••••• ~.
◄9 ••.• do ••••••••••••.••••••••••••••• do................ •••••••••••••••••••• Dr
.SO •••• Jo •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Jo ••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••.•••• Dr
51 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do................ •••••••••••••••••••• Dr
52 •••• Jo ••••••••• u••··········· .•.. do ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • •• Dr
53 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 40 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Dr
s, .... do .••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do................ •• •••••••••••••••••• Dr
M •••• do .•••••••••• ·••••••••••••• Nuny Spin11in1 Co .•.• Ralpb R11bbi111...... Dr
~ •••• Jo .•.••••••••••••.•••••••••• ·.do •••••••••••••••••••• do.............. Dr
!ii •••• do ...•••••••.••••••••••••• Rhyn~Hauttr ~H1.
Co .•••••••••••••••••••• Jo.............. Dr
58 .••• Jo ..•.....••.••.•••..• ." .•.•.•. do •••••••••••••••••••• Jo.............. Dr
59 .••• do ••..•••••.•••...•••••••• Howtll ~H(. Co •••••.••••. do.............. Dr
60 •••• Jo .••••.•••••••••••••••••••••• do................ Robbi111............ Dr
&I • · •• Jo .•..•......••.••.••.••.•..•. Jo .•.••••.•••••••..••• do •••••••••••••• Dr
n ◄½ miles SE. or CberryTilk •••• Tryon School •••••••••.••• do •••••••••••••• Dr
6J •••• Jo........................ Fr,:d Bir1ental!" ••••••••••• do.............. Dr
6-t •••• do .••.••••••••••..••••••.. AnJtt10n H11u .••••..•••. do •.•••••••••••• Dr
~ ~½ miles :-.W.o! Bu,e,mrr City 0. L. Ki.tr ••••••••••••••• do .••••••••••••• Dr
&& 3 mik-1 SW. or 6-lllfT City. C. C. Harrtilon •••••..•••. do •••.•••••••.•• Dr
&i 2.1i mik-1 ;\\\". or 8'3111'mc, City. R. V. Guitoo ••••••••• Hickory Pump Co .•• Or
68 l milcw \\". of 01ll.1J1.. •. . . • . • • • Joe Holland.......... . • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • D1.11
l¼mile.W.ofOallu ••••••••.
2 mikl SW. of 01Uu ...•••••••
I¼ mila W.of Oa!lu •••••••••
I mik S\\". of OaUu •..•.••••••
01.U... ....•••••••••••••••••
R. E. Suminty •••••••. Robbi111 .••••••...•• Dr
E. D. Puour .••....•..... do ••.••••••••••• · Or
CountJ Hom,........ • • • • • • • • • .•• • •• • • . . • Dr
C. S. Vincent •••.•••.• Robbint ..••••• :: ••• Cr-Dr
Morowrb Collon Millt
Co................................... Dr
H Jlalf•niilt W. of Spencer
Mount&in ..••••••..•.•••••• Sam LoYe •.....••••.• Ralph Robbina.... Or
75 Sr-,totrr :-.lounl.l.io ••....•••.••• Spenetr Mou11t.1.in_
Mill .•.•....••..••• R. E. Faw •.•••.•..• Or
78 I¼ milt SW. of M~unt Holly. Globe Mille. Inc .• .,, •. _ •••.. __ •• . • ••.•• •••• Or
, , ..•. do ..•.....•••••••.•••••.•.•... do .•.••••••••••...••••••...•••••••. _ •• Or
78 I mil, :,;w, of ~fount Holly ..•. K,ndrid Brick _It
Tik Co .•..•••.•....••••..••••••••.•.••• Dr
i9 •••• do .•••••.••••••..•..••••••.••• do ••...•••••••••••..•••••••••••••••.•• Cr-Dr
80 I o:iil, S. of Mouot Holly...... Amttican Y1.rt1. Int
81
"
" ..
Nim, P\&oL •••••••. J.S. Hin9C>CI •••.•.•. Dr
J mi!ea S. of :-.1oun1 Holly •••.• Duh Powrr Co.
Mountain Wa.nd
Dam .•.••••••..•••.•••••••..••••••.•••• Cr-Dr
2½ mi lea S. of Moun I Holly... Dula Power Co.
Supply Yan! •••••••• H. L. La1rr .••••••.. Cr-Dr
Mount Holly................. Duk, Power Co .•••.••.••.••••..•••••••••••.•.••••
2 milr1 S. of Mou11t Holly .•••.• Sup,erior Y1tt1 MiU.
Tucku.-ctt Pw:it .•. R.E. Fa.w .••.•••.•• Dr
o., ..
of w,U
(fttt)
250
lOO
l!O
""'· ,00±
238
18'
15().200
15().200
132
113
uo
210
171½
IOO)i
130
,0
,0
12'
"' u.
1<2
l:?0
330
"
HZ
"' " "
"
130
00
"' ,.,
70±
lOO+
"
"'
r W•ltrkYrll
Tota! haN-Oia!Dfler Dtrith o M91 (Mid or .,n cuin1 (Cttt btlo• / Yi,IJ Int,) Cinchn) (Cttt) 1urfac,) : f1,1un.) Cp.p,ro.l
5 5/8
0
& •··•···· ••••••••••
5 5/8 ... : .••• ········•·
•
10 ••••••••••••
40 ••••••••••••
50 ..
30
25
"
,0
,o
55/8 •••••.•• 100 ················-···
S 5/8 .•.••••. ••··•••••·
55/, •.•..•.. 90
5 5/8 ·····~·· ~·········
5 $/8 ••h~•••
5 5/8 •••••••.
..
,0
55/8 •••.•.•• ◄0
5 5/8 118 H
5 5/8 ..•.•... •••·•·•••·
5 5/8 80
5 5/8 118
5 5/S ••....•••.•••...•.
5 5/8 ...•...• ········•·
5 5/8 .....••••.•••••.•.
S 5/8 ~5
5 5,'11 90
5 5/8 $-4 H
,.
,0
20-25
,._,.. ,._,,
25
" 10-12
" " ' . 25 ,.
,o
" "
3.1
30
5 5/8 ....•...•••••••...••••••.. ·•••••••••••
5 5/8 ...•....
30
5 5/8 .. ,,, •
5 5/8
"
120
102 ,.
101),S
II
,.
3.1
'"
0 ••••••••••••
" 18
10
'
(0
18
"
IO
0
,_,
....
"
"
" " " "
50
3.1
" " "
" "
..
..
"
53
Rt11u.1uta
Sot UIN; i1UUl!i.cient ritlJ. o,.._
11• r. o,.w.
On Ea.t Main S~1. Flat.
At olJ ChtJTJTi])e :-.tr1. _Co. .......
Analyaia. w,n ~ yda. S. oC
Cbttryyillt Cotto11 :-.rill. A.
u.lJ'l'I i11 ta.hie.· Draw.
An.aJ.yu. U11d« w1tu tank.
. Hill. . .
At tool bou:,,i:. Capped. Hill.
At U.. pwllp 1t.1.tioa.. Hin. · ·
At tank; in yard. Hill
Azialyai&. IkbinJ Cunerr.
mo,._
At Cl,llDffJ". &ope. A.NJ,-_ South ol Wik. oa
Cllloa'J lot. 0n W.
Neu !iu-W1y min.. o. .. . ,,. .. .
P1anl 2. Orn.
Plant 2. not \aN; iruu!5ciut
.. ta-. Hin.
ComP',tly well I. Hill.
Comp&.Dy w,U 2. Hill.
Hill.
Scbitt. Hill.
ScbitL Draw.
W1ltr nported lo coatai11 iroo..
Scloi,L
Scbitt. !.a.rJe yia}d, 10ft ntu
and no iroo RP'lfted. Rill.
Soft 'Wllltr nportcd. Sclwt.
S\opc.
Wtll drintd oo (n-llit• lrd1,.
Gru.ite. Hill. ...
Granite. Good yi,ld nl)Ol'ttd.
S~o<-
G.-..niw. S\ope.
Gruite. Slope.
Gr&llitt. Hill.
Ju1t below top of ,harp hill.
Schist.
QuarhiW. Draw.
Uttd by mill 111d Yillact, Slop,,.
U..d by mill and rillare. llill
Diori W. Hill
11° ,. .Diorit.. Slope.
Wen IIOl UIIOd; 00 .. tr, ob-
ta.ioed. Dioritr. V~y.
Gno.it.e. Suppl.ieii II familiea.
S\opci.
Gran.it.. Hill
Svppl.iea J h<K»ei!.
e2· F. Schia1t s~ppli~ ,ili-
a.cw. Slopc.
g
I
D
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
54 GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
RECOHIIE-Of' Wnu-J:S CAHO~ Cot::"'TT-Contin11ed
l,oc1,T10lf
0.11.U:ll
Ocptb
Ty~ o! o! •tU
•rll (fttl)
U 2 milee 8. o( Mow:il ~oDr ...... 8laprnor l'ara Mille,
Tocb,qtt Pl.AL •• Cartrr ••••••••...•. Cr-Dr M 2J.,raileeSll.'.ofMOW1tHoD7 •• J.W.B,rd ••••••••••• J.1'',Robl,in1 •.••.. ()-..Dr 17 Nortli Belmoat •••••••••••••••• Annt Spi.11.oio1 Co .••••••••••••••• ~........ Dr 88 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Dr n .... do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Dr
00 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••• Li.afore! MiU., Inc .••••••••••••• ~ ••••••••••• Dr II ..do ........................ Perfection Spin.nine
Co. ••••••••••••• ·•• •••••••••••••••••••• D, t2 •••• do ........................ F. E. Bradah.l• ••••••• lb,,~ .•••.•.•••. Cr-Dr Ol •••. do........................ Sto•t Spin.nine Co..... HX:ht)' Drillin1
Co. •••••••••••••• Dr
94 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••••••••• RobLi.nt............ Dr 9.5 •••• do .. -••••••••.••••••••••••••• do .••.••.••••••.•• 'Wioe •••••••••••••• Dr
11G •••• do ............................ do .••••••••••.•••• l\·ir:it (1)........... Dr
07 1)-i mila N, of Bt/m011t •••••••• Btlmont Abbt7 ••••••• VL Mada. Co ••••••• Dr 118 J milt NW. o! Btllll011t.. •••••• South Forl Ml,;. Co... Sydaor Wtll C'o ... ·•· Dr
OIi lkl.mollt ••• ~···-···-········· C1imuBi,iooio,Co .••••••••••••••••••••••• Cr-Dr JOO .•••• do .••••••••••.•••••••••••• B~lior Spuulio1 Co .•• Sydnor Well CG..... Dr
IOI •••• do........................ Crele'tot Spi.onUl1 Co ..•••.•.••••••.••.•••• Cr-Dr 102 •••• do .••••••••••••••••.•••••••••• do................ R. E. F■•.......... Dr
103 •••• do •••.•...•..•• :·········· K■tional Yarn Mills: •••••.•••••••••••••••• Cr-Dr
104 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••.•••.•••• do ••. ·•·•••••·•••· •••.••••.••••.•.••. · Cr-Dr IOl ••• · do ••••.••••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••.••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••.. Cr·Vr
106 .:~.do •••••••••••••••••••••••• Irniieri■J Yani Mills.
Inc ..... ." •.•••.•••• Kirk~r .•••..•..••. 107 •••• do .•••••••••..••••••••..•.•••. do .•.••••••.••••..•••. do .••••••••••... 10! •••• do •••••.•••••••••••••.•••••.•. do •••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••• IOG .•••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do ..•.•.•••••••••.•••••.••••••••..•... llO •••• do........................ Moolt.eU let A Fut! . Co .•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••..••• Ill .... do .•••. -.••••.••.•••.•••••.•• do .••••..•••..•••.•.•.•..••••.•••.•... 112 I rnilr S. of Ddmoot........... Ht11ry Llotlier1n
P. '\\·. M11• (T,oaot) RobLint ....•.•••.•. 113 l!,tmile■S.ofBtl.tooot .••..... ~lr.M■tb,raoo ..•..•••..•. do ....••......•. I H I 111ilf SW. of 1!,l.tooot......... Mi. Florrn~ A~
R. L. lln'.IOk.l
Cr-Dr
Cr-Dr
D,
Cr-Dr
D,
Cr-Dr
D,
D,
(Tenaot) ••.•••••••••••• do ••••••••••.••• Dr 115 • milct SE. of Brlmonl •.••.•••• 116 •••• do •••••••.••••••••••••••••
l\0
• G. Or,110111 ••••••••••• do •••••.••.••••• Dr
1
J.M. Bo•to
S. B. ~fitld .•....••••. do •.•..••..... ~; Dr 1· H{ miln SW. of n,lmont .••••• l 18 j I Yi n,iln S\\·, of Cno,nton .•••
Eacit: Yarn Milli •••••• Wine ff) ........... Dr II. R. Lant •••.••.•••• Uurril .•.•••..•.••. ; D111·Drl
IIV \ 2mile,\l:_ofCno,ttlon ••.•••. 1·W.S.Quinn •.••..•.•. RoLLi11.1 .•••.•.••.• 1 Dr ! ... rlo ........................ : Artbur~uw_-········/····d~ ............. ! Dr ~ mila Sf.. 11{ Gwtoni1. Plan:■110,'. Pile ........
1
. Jl1m11!011 ... _. ••.•... j Dr I!~ mlJc:1 SIi' or Cramcr1011. L. Y,. f'am■.. .• .. .. •. JU)ph JtobL,n, ..•... i Dr. 123 j .... do........ Church of God ............................ ! Cr-Dr IH I ... do .................... W. E. Miid,,11 ........ ~lpb Robbi111 •••••. 1 Dr
;;! [::::::::::::::::::::::::::·tore:~;.~;:::::::: ::J::::::::::::j g;
I 1211 , ••. do ........................ ~ Flru,don ............................ Ct·Dr
&&&
" '" '" ,.,
300
, ..
!00
1,053
" 300
'"
100+
132
'"
I I!
'"
"' '"' I03
"
80
100
112J..1
"
""' MJ,-j
I~~ I
" " 111
"
' ' •
8
• .. ,
10-s-e
• IO
•
8
8
IO
3
10
3
3
3
•• 3
Oci,tb of Watff lntl ca■ul& (letl belo•
(Cetl) aw-t-)
.,
46(ot
10inch)
..
"
,0
80
80
"
,o
•••••.•• 35 lo 40
35
S S/8 •••••••. .,
,o 5 S/8 ;o
S S/8 ◄II
S S/8 ....... .
S S/8 ..
" "
J;
S l/8 ....•...........•.
S S/8 "
'
I
lo+
2
10 .. ..
35
80"
2)i
"
• 12-16
"
Toi.aJ h■,d.
11n1 (lirlJ ... ,
(p.p.n:r,,)
'" 80
80 ..
80
" ,o ..
..
50
Rr1uau
Schill. l'allfr,
FJ.L
152° F. &-lu.L Hill.
63° r. Sehut. Co<ni-iir •di 2:oorth &idt oli,kaL. Dru .
ScbiaL ComPMy ·•rll I; tut nid ol mill. Hi!L e2,(" F. Schilt, Slopr.
63}(' F. Schitt. Slopr.
Scbilt. Hill.
6fJ9 F. Schiat. W,U i, trool.
td 111d turbine can't be ltt lo•a-tJwi U ft, 10 PUIDPI . only .1.5 r.p.m. Slo~.
Schill. lkhiod cb·111c11. HiU.
&tun. Yiddtd 60 lll'low Ptr minute when drilW. ·0ra•
Scbiat. &ope .
II e . .. . . . . . • . •. Dra •. Aul)'m, t!O 50 64¼° F. Stb.i,L h.mp 1rt
to ,idd fl l·P-ZD• Drar. lJ-i 45 SchltL Ridie. 4 ea Schist. riddtd u ,.p.m.
•btu drilled. 0ra •• . 12 30 152° F. Sc.hilt. Hi.O. S •••••••••••. Schlst. Well at.ndoocd: not
tnou.rb .-.lfor. Hill. 7 40 6cbi1L e:2° F. At upPtr t11d
of mill Slo~. 3½ •••••••••••• AtTOaa ro.d !tom miD. · SioPt, 3)-i •••••••••••• Scbilt, At ki•er tod of mill.
• • II
30
"
25
"
35
" :?i ,.,
"
" ,0
"
l5
"
" 1,s
110
" "
Slop,.
Sebilt. inn.
Schiat. Slope.
Do.
Sduat. Dn•.
Do.
Do.
Sc:h'i.t.
Gr1.11.il.t. S1o~.
Suppl.ie. IU hou.1CS. o,..w.
Schilt. H"i.ll.
&bin. SJopt.
83° f'. Schilt. Drn.
Schist. Dur JJ !Ht, Rod is
!io, 1r1io,d: rrHo to 'rny
tcbilt. Hill
Cno.iu. Slop,,
100 30
63° Fi. Gn,,ite. Jljl!,
Schill. Slope.
" Hill.
•.•••••••.••.••••• _&:ppli,. g bo111e1. Ifill.
,o
'
J,S •••••••••••• Sc:bilt, Nol uaeo:I; not fl,outb
•at.er. Slo~.
"
Slo~.
Slop,.
A wtll 85 !Ht dHp, SQ fHt
fl'Oal •eU 12;-Yidd.l I pDon ~r mi.out,. Slope. Hi ..•...•.•••. Soft -■

l
e
t
.

Slope.
..
D
D
D
GEOLOGY AND GRO.UND WATER IS THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA 55
Rt:COIIOS OF W•:u.:,,, I' (; \""'"' CoC:"i'TY-Cot1Hnued
I
w,n I
:io. I l.oC.t.TIO!'t D11u.,u
---------1------1-----i
IN :! milt-ii SW. 11f Cramtrlon .•••.• T. Hopf' ••••••..•••••• lulph Rot,hin1
130 •••• do .•••••••.•••••.••••••••• LC. lloarJ .•....••.•.... Jo .•••••.
131 •••• do ••••..•••••••••••••••••••••• do., .••••••••••••••••• Jo ....
132. ~l,Ad,nvil~.................. Sto..-r ~filb, Int....... Jliekorr rum" 1 ·o
Ill •••• do .••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••..••••• Ro.hhiru.
13< .•••• d: •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••••.•••• J 1!1 •••...
135 J.{ mile E. of Lo•f'II ••••••••••• Or. J. W. Rtid
II. T. liawk (ltnanl). fu.lph ltol./JOnt
136 Lo•tll ..•.•...•••.•••••...•.• J. ll. llOOIOl1 ••••••••.
137 •••• Jo ••.•..••••.•••••.••••••• X1tion1I \\"t:uinr C'o .••••••••••.••..
, ... .I _,
I•
I•
I•
I••
I•
I•
I•
I•
I•
I Total """· I l•~k Di.meltr Depth of Waltrlenl nN1 (fitld ,
• ••II ol •cU cuin1 (ftd he-lo• Yid,J ; te.t,) ! "-:'~j (incht-,) ~ IUrfaa) ~! (p.p,m.) J
1---:1------..
•
.5 S/8
.5 .5/8
5 .518
32
: •••..••••.•• 1 ,~,..
11 i ~O Sthill. llill
0 1············
100+ 2JO
II
&:hist. Xot UKJ.
Hilt
43¼° F. Supp[ia
to1111: ~1ope.
SchiJt. l"Jed onlr
1:t11c7. Sklt>t.
Schill l" aed ooly
. 1eocy.
So •at,r.
aiilla aod
ia tlIIU•
ia tmtr•
" "
, Sc:b.ial Ora.-.
/ Supplitt 35 hou.ws and 1enral I • 138 •••• do ••.•.••••••••••••••••••••••• tlo ••••••••••••••••.••••••••..... I•
20
"
"
11
60
20
32
Sot ia u,t. Watn nporttd
to be hlrd. Ora.-.
Do. Slope.
I
I
I
139 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••.•••• do .•••.••••••••••••••••••••....
HO I mile SW. of Lo..-rU........... \\". A. Front°'rrtr .•••• Ralph Rot,1,.,..
HI •••• do •••••••••••••••.•.•••••• Setur·• Camp ..•••••••••• Jo .•••...
112 2)'1 milts E. of r. .. toai1 ••••••. G.astoo Cou~ur Cluh ..•••• Jo ..•....
113 •••• Jo •••......•••••••••.•••••••.. tlo •.•••••••...•• : ••••• do ..
'" 14'
2 milts E. o(t:utouia .••.•••.• Aker-. :\lolOf Linn Co .•.••• do
3!{ mile, :-.:E. of G .. tonia .••.•. A. ~I. ::ironc-~If, ...... Ralph Ro!il,u,.
U6 •••• do~ ....•••.••••••••••••.•.•••• Jo •••••••••••••••••.•. do •••.....
Bl .f milct ~E. of Gutt>ni,........ Ranln ~U,. Co ..•.•••••••• Jo •••••.
148 •••. do •••••...•••.••..•..••••• TutilMr. Inc-.
Pri1c-ilb ~111, ••.••. SyJnor \\"~U !"o
IHI ••.. do .••••••••••••••••.••••••..•. .Jo ••••••••.......• Ralph Rot,l,,na
150 •••• do .•.....••••••.••..•••••.•••• do ••••.......•.••••••. do .... I 151 i' ... Jo ............................ Jo................ V,. """· Co
1.52 1 •••• do ..•.•••••....••••••••••••••• do ..••.....•...•••
I
I
I
I
I
i 1.5~ !· ... Jo ..... . .• . . •.... .• . Rn Sµiru1in1 ("o Ralph Rol,1,.n,
1.5~ '···.Jo .... . .•••....• do .••••••.•. • ••• Jo
1.55 ! .... do ...•. .•.. Jo .•••..•.... rn .
1.5d ! :!' j mil" .\'E. nf 1:u1oi,i ........ (trovr-11 Thrnd c·o Ralph Rnii!,iu,
1.57 ' ..•• Jn ..•....••..... do •.•••.......•••..•. Jo ..
1.51! ... tlo ..•.•. .••. do...... . .....••... do ...
1.59 ••. Jo ..... . •••• do.... • .•....••.. do ....•..••.
100
IOI
1'2
103
I"
"' "'
107
108
"' 170
Iii
; ..•• Jo .. .
.•. dn
.. Jo ..•
..•• do ..•.
.. ...... •.•. do ..... .
.•••••......••••.... Jo ..•••..
.•.. do ...
.Jo ..
.... Jo
..•• do........................ Flint Mfr. Co .do
.... do..... . •.....•• do .••.•..........•••. do
.... do..... . ..••.... do ........•••........ do ..
l¾ cnilc-i ;\. of Liutooia. C. A. U.rklc-y .....••.•••. do ..
Guuw,i.a ....••..•......•••••• Grc-n1011 Mil!. 1··· do ..•.•••.•.....••.....•••
: Gu1oni.t. ..••... I I mile:;. of Gut0<1i1
l
1 ~i mik1 S. of l,1,uooi.t.
Sunriat Dairy
Tu1i1c-1, Inc.
8'minolt Plaot
Ruhr.Cotton .\fiU
(Tl. ...
Ralph Robt,in1
R.llph Robl.ina.
,.
I• ..
,. , ..
I• .. ,.
I•
,.
, ..
I•
I•
I>•
I>,
"' "'
"' "' o,
D, o,
D, o,
D, o,
o,
D,
o,
0, o,
D,
o,
o,
D,
'" : ~ ~ '
Hl.5'.J
IUJ
uu
;g
Ii~
,00
,oo
110
\!ll
:? 12 I"
I"
"' 90 ..
IJ2
60
'"' " llli
IJJ
26.YT)
"'
"'
120
"' "'
" .5 .5-11 •••••••• '
H2
" " 5 .5/11 .••• , .•...•.•.••••
"
.5 .5/5 " "
.5 .5/8 00 18
" "
.5 ,5/8 ••··•••. ·••••··•·•
,, I "'
i ' .. ::i:: :::1
, ''" . . .. I. . ··! : ,,, :: : :I::::: I
! 5/8 ..... :::1·· . .50
.5 .5/11 .•....••••.••••
5 .5/8 .. i H
5 .518
" I '"
"
4J "
JO
20
18
11
12
20
20
'
IO
I02
IO
IO
"
" !JO
" " ::0
" 12
12
II
' JO
20
JO
"
"
I I
"
JO
············
·'' ············ .,
,0
Ii,
"
JO
"
············
··········· JO
Sebiat, Slope.
Scb.iat. f'.'atff rrpo,ttd to be
cor-rwi.-e. Ora.-.
Schill Dru.
Not u.ted; 110t cll001h -nlc-r,
Schist. SJope.
Schist. Slopt.
2 othn similat •c-lb at 111ill
and Tiib.~ Flat.
YiddeJ 27 plkxui • minute
.-b,11 drilled. HiU.
Dra.-.
N'ot uttd. Tnttd at 65 c.p.cn.
.-bm drillN. Y'ttlJ de•
a-rQttf to 20 c.p.m. whc-t1
1bsod011tti. HiU.
Schist. Not uwd; eappc-d.
Hill.
Sc-hUllt. Sol" ~; nr.ppt,J.
Draw,
&2½0 f. Sch.Uit aod qu.art,ite.
Schist. YieldNi 2.5 to JO c.p.m.
•hu driUed. Draw.
Scl:ti1t. Hill.
::khi1t. .H,andontd l,ec;.i~
water beeame muddy. Draw
llill.
liuuilt. \V;ater ol,t..iueJ •t,80 r~,. o, ••.
f\1!2° F'. G~nite. Ora•.
Granite. Onw.
Granit.e. WeU at ,_,,,oir.
v ......
Gr-snit,. On.-.
Granite. Draw.
Granite. Hill
Granite. Dnw.
Do .
Do.
Supp!iN 9 bou.tn.
SlnP'.
Schi.tt. On..-.
&hiat.
Schial. W,u,r obLainc-d 11 ;o
rHt. Slop,:.
Granit,. Dn.w.
Granite. Slope.
82° f'. Gr~ite. Dn•.
Gr111it~. Dr••· D, '" I ',;', . ::.· Jo . :[····,;;····1 · ::::1 Jo __ i ________________________________________________ _ :::::! r."niLe. !fill.
I
0
0
u
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
56 GEOLOGY AXD GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLl1'A
w,U i Loe.no• ~, Owna Dau.u.a
D,p<h
Type or o1 wtU ..a ((ttt)
i:s
171 m
178
"'
180
181
TnUlea, Ioc.
Oaaeab. Plant •••••••••••••• _ ••••••••••••• Dr
I}imiaS.olGutonia •••••••• Di100MiU. .•••••••••• Ra!phRobbi111 •••••• Dr •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••••••• Dr 2 miles 8. ol Outoaia..... ••••• :rutike. l11c.
Yi,etory Plant ••••.•• ·················;·· Dr
2½ mikt S. ol G-.toaia •••••••• Tutila, Inc.
Myrn Pla11t........ Ralpb Robbi11.1 •••••• Dr •••• do ••.••••••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••••••• Dr·
•••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••..••••••••••• do ••••.••••••••• Dr 2¾ milel S. of O..toaia •••••••• Ru.Ha11o•tr Milla, Inc.
(Huo•rr Plant) •••••••• do .••••••••••••• Dr
182 •••• do ••••••••••••••••••.••••••••• do .••••••••••••••• Ware •••••••••••••• Dr· 183 •••• do •••••.•••••••••••••••••••••• do •••••••••••••••• Robbi111 •••••••••••• Dr 184 3},i mike S. of Gutonia •••••••• Tutlle., foe.
Ridtt P\a.ot •••••.•••••. do •••••••••••••• Dr 1&5 •••• do •••••••••••.•••••••••••••••• do •••••••..•••••.••••• do ••••••••• .,,. ••• Dr
"' 187
18!
"'
2½ inila SE. of G..tonia .••••• 1. A. Brad.du• ••••••••••• do ••••.••••••••• Dr 3½ milol SE. of Guto11ia •••••• Rolotrt M. Braadoo ••••••• do •••••••••••••. Dr •••• do ••••••••••.••••••••••••• H. R. Krndridr. •••••.••••• do •••••••••••••• Dr Gut.onia ••••••••••••••••••••• firatot1t Miii.. Inc. ••.•.•• do ••••••••••••••. Dr
190 •••• do ••••.••••••••••••••.•••••••• do •...••.•••••...• RoLliiiu (!) .•••••••• Dr
191 •••• do ••..••••••••••••••••••••••.• do •..••.•••••••••••••• do.............. Dr
192 : ••. do •••••••.••••••••••••••••.••• do •••.•••.••••••.• Guy Robbiiu •• : •••• Dr l9J·_ : ••• do ••••.•••••••.•••••••••••••.• do •••••••••.••••••.••••..••••.•••••••• Dr
lOl 1"
"' 1g;
"' "'
200
. 201 ,.,
•••• Uo ••••••.•••••••.••••.•••••••• do •..•••.••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••• Dr •••• do .••••••••••••••••.•••••••••• do •••.••••.•••••.• RobLins .•••.••••••• Dr I!i milca W. o!G-.tonia ••.•••. hrkda.lc ~!ill. foe .•••.•••• do .•••...•.••••• Dr •••• do ••••.••••••••••••.••••••.••• do •••..••••.•••.•••••• do ••••••.••••••• Dr ;···.::························ ~~~f~:.loc.; ............... , .....•.... Dr
A.rl.i.o1100 Pla11t ••••..•••••.••••.•••••••• Dr 2 inikl W. of G;.t1111ia......... Threa.dl. Joe .•..••••.• RoObi111............ Dr •••. do ..•••••.••••••.•••••.••••••• do •.•••..••••••••• J.S. Hint00 .••••••• Dr •••. do ••••..••••.••••.••••.•••.••• do •••••••...•..••• Robbiria ••••.•••••.• Dr 203 ••.• do .•..••..••••..••••.•••.••..• do ...••...•..•••.. J. S. Hinton........ Dr zoi •••. do •••...•...••...••••..••••••• do .•.•.....•.••••...•• do.............. Dr 205 Ht milt' W. of Gutonia •••.••• Tutilt:t. Inc.
Myrtle Plant....... •••••.•••.••••.••••• Dr 206 JV. milr1 :,;w. ofGutonia .•••• Clyde lln,dford ..•••.. Ralph Rot,biru •••.•• Dr ,:o; .••• do........................ D. \\".Dawn ••••.•••••..•• do ..•••...• ·.·•.•. Dr
..•. do ....••
~JG •••• do .• .do ...
.•••• 1 R..lr,ti Jt,,1,1,i"!
i ' • ••• <lo
D,
D,
n, u, u, u,
D,
D,
H..11,!o Rot,1,iru... •. . Dr
Jtt
u• ..
136
110
103½
120
180
217
140
"' 120
" .. ..
""'
"'
·125
"' !0i
" (I)
180
'" "
110
"' ,.,
18½ ,oo
!100-1000
110
" IU½
100
100 I i lOh
ii r
132 !
I 10 /
m.i,,;:
'"
IJO
Deplh of Wakr lcvfl Diamelff of·"' (uiebea)
CMinc (feel Lelow YW!d
(feet) -.irfaee) {1.p.m.)
'
6 6/8 •••••••• 6 6/11 ....... .
'
16
JO
6 6/11 ••••••••.•••••••••
6 6/11 •••••••• ··--···--·
,.
16
12
' 16
Tol&I h&nl-
n-(6tld
ltsU)
{p.p.m.)
..
..
20
,.
6 6/8 .................. . 8. •••••••·•·· .
• ,o
8 112
5 6/8 •••••••• ••••••••••
6 6/8 35 JO
I "' ., •...•...•.......
' 6
' ' S 5/8
S 5/8
'
6
8
' 8
' 5 5/8
5 5/8
5 5/!I
5 5/!I
S 5/~
·" ,o
"
100
100
..
"'
JS
35
13 ,.
.13
10.2
10.6
5.0i
"
10
JI
20
15 i· ......... ~o I J5
15± ·······•··
20
30
'
20+
'
,o
"
80
20
" lJ
" " 10
" 8
" 10
" "
10
' ,0
" "
..
············ ............
" ············
" 20 ..
············
············
............
····•······· ············
............
············ " ............
"
30
30
"
,0
" " "
Granitt. liw 1 3:H.J>. Pump. Hill
Gnuite. Dn. ....
Do •
Granite. Oriainany yieklf'd 2.$
l•P·.111· Flat.
Granitt. WrU at tnill. flat .
GI½° r. Gnnite. Oriri111.1Jr
yieldtd 29 ,:.p.m. Dr-...
Gnnite. Well in rilla1~. Hi.II·
12)i" r. Gnnitt. W,U.1111
182 ... 183 111pp.]y •tiff for pl&ot &nd Tillace. An1.lr .. ,ii or .-.ter from •ell 1b
in table. Tt.rapcrature •di 1n. ~• r.
Gnnile. Dn,.
Gnnite. Draw.
Gn.nite croii-out M> reet r~
•ell. Hill:
Gnnile. Dn•.
Schilt. Elac
&bill. Flat.
Gn.nite. l\0 &!tr Up<H"trJ IOl't.
Dn•.
Gnnite. Well I; not iu •· Dn•.
Granite. Well "!; not iu !llf.
Dn•.
Granite. w,u J. Draw.
9tdl 4; not in -· C:ra11i1t.
Dn• .
Gn.nite. w,u 5. o,.. .....
Granite. WellG.
Gnnite. Dn•.
Granite. Slope.
G~s• r. Granite. Hill.
112½"' r. Granit,. Hill.
Granite. ~Ill i11 U9C. n,~ ...
Granite . Aliandoned. Dr1•.
Granite. ~Ill in U5C . . !:!or~ .
6:t?(' r. Gra:,ite.
Gran it,. Dr••·
Granite. SloJ"O',
Granite. Si<lJ.-:-.
Granite. Svppli" ' hoi=
Slope.
Grauitr. JIii!. I Cr.nile. I/ill.
Granilc. J!i!L
\ Sl"I"'·
I ., ,o I I ... i1. ;~;,~:1."r: · ~·,~~. i~;n_,. S!n/ot.
I
&hi.•t. Old •cit m firld. oot
u ... ::J. S101~. '"' I .. ..
~G?~; J·ll' .. ' "
5 5/!I 110 z; "
"
I 1····
! "'
Gzi.-0 f. &hi!t. c·omJ"n.•
j •rll 1. Un•. I
I
I
i
Cu1nf"'".I wrll
huu~d. 11,IL
Schiat. Dr••·
W,11
"·
),t,CATIOlf
GEOLOGY AND GROUND \\'An,: I'-THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
RECORU:i ,,. \\': -I" C.\STOX Col:XTY-Contin uect
o .... '.
! Dtpth
,,..,,., ofwell
{ftte)
Diamtltt
of •tll
(intht1)
I I I Total h&,,J.. J. D,epdil °':Water lutl1 llf"III (6rld
CMiac '(feet t..ela• 1 \-1eld f leata) j
((N:l) : ,udact) (&-p.m.) (p.r,.m.) ; --+---1--
57
Rr.11111u
"' 8tsSCmer City •••••••••••••••• Alp.Ion M,r,. Co .••••• l ... do 113 s .s;s IO< I " " ·······-·--· X11l ...J, •utr rrpcl('ted to I
:?Ill .••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••• 0.-.Ct Mfr. Co ..•••••••••.
2:?0 1,7 mil~ SE. of Bea,cn,r City.. L.A. Wolle........... Jule,~ R..t,o1._.
:?:?I t mile11 SW. of Baaemer City ••• R. L Lois Dairr .•••••••• Jo
?22 2},i miln SW. o( tk.eam Citr. Pine Gron Grill ••••••••.. do
:?:?3 I uiile NW. or Kinp ~f011,ntai11 •• Earle E. Carf'l'nl,r ••••.•.. Jo
:?2~ MO\lnt.ain View ••••••••••••••• FriN11 Mfc, Co .••••••••.....
:?:?5 •••• do .••• · ••••••••••••••••••••••• do ••••••••••••••••••...
:?:?II •••• Jo .••••.••••• · ..••••.••••. R.H. Hook •••••...••• Ralph k~,. .... zz; .... do ••••••••••..•••••••••••• Han,:y fiuine ••••••••••• Jo
H milt ~E. o( ~lount&io
View •••••• : •••••••••••••••• Mn. Eur, Rot..erts .•••.•...
2½ mila SE. of ~ouolaio
Vie•....................... A. L. Dial............ R..alpb R•-u•
130 3 milaS. of Mouotain View •••• J. A.Stro.,;pe ••••.••••••..
231 4½ miln S. of ~fountain View •• Wilton ind Bro•o •••••••.•..
132 5 miln S. of Cutonia .••••••.•• T. L. Ho•il........... R.a!rb ft.,. • .,.
233 5 1/3 mi1n S. 11( Cutonia .•••.• Enn B...ndoo ••.••••••••. do
23.f 15 milt11 S. or Gutonia •.•••••••• C. E. HOfleyeutl ..••••..•. Jo
235 •••. dn ..••••.••••.•••••••••••• W. L. Hutchiton .••••• Tom\..,, n-, 7 milu s. of Gutonia...... ••• • Tom Spa.rro• •••••••••.•...
237 •H mi1nS.orC ... t.onia •••••••••••• do •••••••••••..•.. R.aloh RM◄•-
2l8. 4.¼' milN SE. of Gutoni1.. •••• Carroll Ktrt .............. do
2311 4¾ miln :iE. of Gutonia. ••••• W. S. Torrence
F1init• Dairy ••••••.... Jo
210 •••• do ...••••.•••••••••••••••• C ... toni1 AirporL ..••• U. S "'"''
Zll 5¾'111ilt11SE.ofC.,.tooia ...••• S..odyPl.ainChurch ••• Tom l..-1
Zl2
: ..
I••
, ..
, .. , .. ,.
I•.
,._.
I• •·
I• ,,, , .. , .. . o,
°"' ,,,
'"
'" I.>,
'' o,
!',. o,
""
"' '"' IM}i
100
H
17
IOI
"
87
137}1
"
70
Ill! ..
100
90
" "' .,
'"' 102 .,
"
"' !··········
_, Sil ., " ' "' 134 " _, S/! ........ ····-····· _, 5/8 .. "' :H 4l 3; .113
24 17 '·"' _, S/8 ~; •••••• " S SIS 56 .,
JO 0 S0.98
5 .,,s ·•···-·· ······-···
U 411.22
II •••••• ..1 40
5 S,! .•••••.• : u.oo
5 5/! ..•••••• ; ••••••...•
5 S/! ...•.... ! •••••••••. , ,·140•~a 311 Ill ! 511.2_,
_, S/8 .•••••••• : ••••.••••. I , ., "51"·······;
_, S/8'. .•.•••. ;
11 ,a !
"
" ········'.·········· ..
IS
,o
" 20
' ··--···· " ·"+ "''
.....
,.
•
IO ,. .....
be too hard. fht.
···········-rumped at 35 r.p.m. but will
not m1in~in thi1yitld fht. ············ Slope. . ,o Sc:hiat . SloPt, .. Schiat • Slape.
" Sthia~. Hill. ..... ······· Sthill. Suppliea vi!b11t. lliU .
····· ···-··· Grurl?. \·1.!lty.
" Schill, Slope, ,. SchieL Ora• .
Schiat. Hill.
Do. " ,. Sehi1t. Supply raik,J du,i11c
autum11 of li-10 aad 11141.
Hill.
Sc.hilt. Hill.
G,_i~. HiU.
20 Sclt,iat. SloPt,
20 ! Schiat ..
•··•········= Granite.
35 I Schiat. HiU.
•••.•••••••.. 62° F. Schi1t. Cl.Rd M to
j ;s fret. Hill.
20 I Sc:bi1t, Slope. I
30 ! Schi1t. Draw.
::::::::::::! Hirt·
A:iALTSf.S o.-Ga,,c .,o WAn:R FROM GASTO:'i Cot'~TT,• N. C.
(Numbers at heads or column!! correspond to numbers in table or well data)
, part!'! per million)
It " I
I --------1----------------•
::liliei•<Si01) .....•••.•••••...•• J2
fr.,o (F1)...................... .23
Calcium (Ca)................... 44
Ma«neaium {Mr)............... 3.7
Sodium and p,:,~um CH+K) .. II
Cub<>111te (CO,)................ o
Bieuboo,t.e (HCO,J ...•...•....• l&O
SuUat.e (EO,)................... ~-i
Chloride (Cl)................... i.O
F1uorida{f).................... .3
:-,iitut.e (NO,).................. .G
DiaolYtd.olida •••••••.•.....••• I~
,0 i '.,
JI
,.o ,.,
0
'" IO u .,
.0
"'
JI
·" " ' I
" 0
!01
113
'·' 1.0
I.I ,.,
27 ,.,
" ,.,
0.3
0
" ,.,
' ' .0
.0
107"
I
! " " I " . " .08 ·" tO II ' ' ... '.) u
,.3 $.Z ,. ' 0 0 0
'° " " .., 3.0 " 13 i -~ ,. ,
.0 .o .o
IO ,., " II I I 14 lOi
Sprinc ..
97 . l 8Z (G.,.ton
So. A)
I
" I " ' " .0, t .0 .2 la
t2 •. 3 '.' ◄. 7 : .3 '., '., IO ,.3
0 0 0
" ll JI
l.l 13 < J
I.O " I ' .I .[ .0
I.O ' I . ' IOI " " ., " " Tot.&lha.tdne. ... CaCO, ...•••••. ~ 118 1&8 -.,--◄l 1-"--,'-•-•--+---f-----;----
Dat,o(eo~tioa •••••••••...... 11/10,'◄i ll{?0/47
1
11/?0/~i 2/111/~8 Z/111/1812/13/481 Z/111.18 !/11/45 !/11/◄5 I 5/ZO/t9
"A.o&Jy&i1111a.d1 by U.S. GtQM>CicaJ 3111ny.
" f1ow1 ont--h.a!f 1.p.m. from h.ornbl~nda rnti...
1 f, in ..,1u1ioo .01
D
D
D
0
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE:
TO:
FRCM:
December 23, 1993
File
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer North Ca.rolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
RE: Hydrogeology of Gastonia Area Davis Park Road TCE Site Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina NCIJ 986 175 644 .
On December 22, 1993 I talked to Mr. Mark Durway (704-868-3743), the former Hydrogeologist for Gaston County Health Department, Environmental Health Section from 1991 to 1993, about the hydrogeology in the vicinity of South Gastonia and specifically the Davis Park Road site. Mr. DuDV<iy stated that in the area of concern, there is. no confining layer between the saprolite (weathered bedrock) and the .bedrock. The majority of the potable water is obtained from fractures in the bedrock. His conclusion is ,supported in three ways. First, this is based on all of the current literature available on the local geology. Second, it is supported · by field observations of the stratigrophy in the area in the ·vicinities of bedrock outcrops and stream bed cuts. Finally, it is supported by personal geologic experience in the area during his three years in this area.
Nef.
I
0
u
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
May 11, 1994
File
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer
North Carolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
Groundwater Population Calculations for Davis Gastonia/ Gaston County, North Carolina NCD 986 175 644
!
Park Road TCE Site
On May 10, 1994 I calculated the population inside the Target Distance Limits (TDL's) for the Davis Park Road TCE site. First I located the community wells supplied by the N. C. Public Water Supply Secdon on the topographic maps and delineated those houses associated with them. Several community wells. which do not serve over 30 people are identified on Figure 2. These wells and the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision population was determined by house counts on Figure 2. Next· I delineated the area of. Gastonia seryed by the Gaston Water Supply System.
Several areas depicted as urban areas on the topographic maps, pink with no individual houses shown, are located within the TDL's and.are not served by the Gaston Water Supply System. These areas were planimetered and the area (sq. mi.) was multiplied by the population density (315.3 people/sq. mi.I for South Gastonia.
TDL AREA (sq.mi. I DENSITY POPULATION
(people/sq. mi.)
0 -¼ 0.0533 315.3 17
¼ -½ 0.0333 315.3 10 .
½ -1 0.202 315.3 64
1 -2 0.956 315.3 301
2 -3 0 .1.05 315.3 33
3 -4 0.000 315.3 0
Finally those houses not included in any of the above areas were counted. All cf the house counts were multiplied by the population density /2.64 people/house; for Gaston County.
Ref. I
6
D
D
u
u
D
I
I
I
u
I
u
II
u
u
IU
1ITDL
10 -¼ mile
11/, -½ mile
I½• 1 mile
11 • 2 miles
12 -3 miles
I
GROUNDWATER POPULATION
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
COMMUNITY WELLS
Well ID and Name
B -Hedaewood Circle (C0-1 ll
NA -Moore Community Well (C0-22)
NA -Puritan Communitv Well lC0-41
I Subtotal
A -Jenkins Communitv Well lC0-3)
3 • Cedar Oak Park SID
6 -Pennv Park Dr. SID
9 -S""land Dr. SID
12 -Vallevdale SID
I Subtotal
126 -Old Providence SID
126 • Silverstone SID
Subtotal
15 -Kina Grant SID
21 -Mountain Villaqe MHP
23 -Brimer Rental Prooertv
25 -Oakley Park #2 ·
33 -Laurel Woods SID
I Subtotal
1 -Alan Acres
2 -Beverly Acres
11 -Sunset Park SID
13 -Lamar Acres
14 -Park Place
16 -Maolecrest SID
17 • Hickorv Villaqe MHP
19 -Bren=ood MHP
24 • Northwoods MHP
27 -Rabv's MHP
29 -South Lane SID
30 -Suburban MHP
32 -Woodland Acres
34 -Windwood Acres SID
35 -Raintree SID
39 -F allscrest II SID
40 -South Forest SID
41 • Amv Acres
Q.· ,
4'
II Poe. I
42
6
16
66
29
69
34
60
160
352
30
160
190
519
135
. 40
300
180
1174
417
147
344
159
135
240
160
70
75
84
48
186
128
BB
256
240
124
sn
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,1
I
I
I
I
I
GROUNDWATER POPULATION
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
Urban Areas not Supplied by the Gaston Water District
TDL I Area (sg. mi.) I Densit~
O -¼ mile 0.0533 315.3
¼-½mile 0.0333 315.3
½-1mile 0.202 315.3
1 -

2

miles 0.956 315.3
2 -

3

miles 0.105 315.3
3 -

4

miles 0.00 315.3
Density Is based on 1990 US Census Data
House Count from Topographic Maps
TDL Houses Density
o -¼ mile 30 2.64
¼-½ mile 20 2.64
½ -

1

mile 17 2.64
1 -

2

miles 249 2.64
2 -

3

miles 544 2.64
3 -

4

miles 462.00 2.64
Density Is based on 1990 US Census Data
Total Groundwater Population
TDL House Count Urban Areas
O -¼ mile 79 17
¼-½mile 53 10
½ -1 mile 45 64
1 -

2

miles 657 301
2 -

3

miles 1436 33
3 -

4

miles 1220 0
I Poeulation I
17
10
64
301
33
0
Population •
79
53
45
657
1436
1220
Comm. Wells Total Pop.
66 162
352 415
190 299
1174 2132
4339 5808
2137 3357
---
(
----------
r·.-
!~:.•,:•. tJ.1:. r·111:I 1· L:t,"ll"i'•: ~:::q;>r·t.\ ··:~·:·.rEM
,,;:·1 I Vl'. :·.~:;fl.<1!.;
.\:~; ,•._•.•.;, 1./.JW~J TIIJ.lt·. (•!11{'/ .. ~•.; / ()IJ] 11:1,)
r,E :; • r·L: R:.i1 JN
·, 'r I ·1.:. •-•( JPUL,~ r fl II'! WllhK Fl l(1r-lE ~;rn ,r~r.E N,tME
sour,cE SOURCE
r (PE AVr, lL.
1 1.:\i,t'.J<I 1rvt:1,1. T" ACt\E!;
3 1 3.', l i :1 CL::D,4f.: OAI< S/D
~ f''·r __ ,--Ar•r...-r,s
C1.11tc1 t.,,f<C.[N!3
,;
r:
-s-
-e-. ~ 2,1,LClll)('rl /1(,l'lf'CI':•·
11:l.L.CI '!J:_,;; ••1··•n 1:r;A ,,
bo1·1rc _;,·,;··r:,,, C
1,,1'!''l C''!i. Ell r:t
~ ~:-1GL' ll.Y'I l'.'tl
~ r:n6U.dtJCli; ,,r·tc,_ 1: r_ce,t.wcco 1,t.1 ____ 11·
E1>6EWOOU ,·GRE.J t3
~P. M_L~·c:r.1:s1 f ~i,'ll
FT"tlc~I ·r:1·,T ;-___.;;/!~
ffJti!,-.1 ,•1:
1/ t:~<',1'.:,'l f'IIXl'll,I. :;..-c, ...r 13<',t:,:: r ,,,o .. •Jlhl)i :;,·1,1
' 7
P1HU1 'o I .11 ·u.JI;
1::,-1,1·1-1 r·L:1~Nr r·nr-t~ l~F: t,lll( '.;T~i
l'.'i:,1 .'I, I 1NI :; hllF
I · J l~I. 111 !I ·
"f .t:~,~l!i'., f,;1ltiitJl•l•·1·10K 1··1 ,~,1:1;· 1 1:'J,tf.l'.J S1:Yt.,',Nl.• /)J,:
l :st, 1 ,_.-:·, !.> l'l"lf•!•I. l\rJI) (.i lM11l )fl I ·1 "1' ~:•.11 'I 'I. ... lo 1:v,j•,',' :~\ll<l_l!,[l,'>I~ Hl:11~!11'::; :i/1)
II L~;.1-,·1: ~,;/t-4~·;1·1 1·,tr,J{ ' .. ,-'))
/L..!3-'•1'_:,, .. v.-11.1.1 ·r11.-,, V ~;111, i';tlh/'", ~;t.11·r-·1 ...,.,! -}-t----rl ·.-,!-+ ·-·~·•• .... +-l~-+-il---lf-'i-'l.
L\:,'..'.l.'·' 'llll,;l<".IJ,-HI!) !;, f)
'(. >1.1.tli,l."J.,
:S,,'.'(i', [ ,_n;I':':!'1:1,:{ll'll{ I.'
1'3 1.1.,:'l''• t ,·,11,~1: r,1·1sr
/'/ 1 l·,',t.:i( I I ,"\t.!· IS 1 J.,'.~11 1: 11-i,:-:.; 1·,1-:flui .·U .'£ I"' .. '.'.~:•,_; /l,",1·1.: ,.·1.;:.:_:1 !~ •,
l :c .. ·,: '.'l M-\1• I,", 1 ·;,1.-1, :;,• i•
-+,-
c
r.
-B-.,.
"" "
,.-
. i:
i;
(:
-------re:
r:
I+
,:
-f--;-
c
,:
~,-
.-: ,:
r:
"
·H "'i 7010.-!,:--:;•//>12 WELL -:-i _J, •. .'C 1:! ., .. 1'~ 1;;:li \!Cl 1.
l•l"r' 704fJ/,79~,--H WELL ,: 1 .to~ WEt.L
i 71 ?,l 1fJ6 -·1n~-q l,,/£Ll.S 11 2
l."', ~ 'i'fl 10, . .?9531 WEL.U3 .i.t,;>
. tSCi 70 10<.' ~-i!?R'l tJEI..L I;::
t,rn le 18(,f_"2""J? ~/ELI. "'!
~ S 1 09W!i?2'i: (<'7 1 •~~IJ.. :~.~!: ·•G l□P. _r,;,; ?.>JELL.I
30<> re, 1a.,_,,_e, ~ tdf.:LL.3 ·_t,,o ?O•G?.1~•:1~9 or(l..' .. E
l'C!l 711 :n:::: 1:~1.. i? (/CL.LG
19() "'Oqr1~_, 1·w-·9 I IP_U:;;
" .,......__ .. .;.--,. •.. .....,__.,u ,.....,.,,
~ ... -..... ___ ~---...........
•'"T,-.· -~•---•·H:·-,:-· . ..., -tt·•·•
.~., l-11 I I
: 'I\., l•IFI. I ..
~ liil •. i. di -. ··'o'"' 10~,•··,··•···c·--. 1•1:~.U.
··•qc ·•c ,~·, •• _., ... ~ : 1r:i.1 .. •"" 1
fM 704Ut,:.;!J<J;~·/ WELL
,:,<:,· j'(M:k,:-';34.;9 l.JEI.L -!-l
o1'' "'0 l0'Z'lT"'l"' 111"1 I
t /,0 "/0'17~H tt:;:w WELi. ,:-j
200 7045:~~';7<;-·','0 WELL :>•M "/(H82.4:!ffl9 WEI.'. ·•o1c •oaw•c·•v·n r-A>'I o, ·re"" nr I /,(.I ,-.,.
:·~:~-,
Wl:l.LS
~
wi.::u. ,: 1
~ \.J~~(
•lOO ·1045:!::;"/'l':'() t..tELL
1 '.:i'i -f(J-10(, 7•7'.;,:v+ W~;]_ l .:·i
r..iJ , ()), .... ,I 1 •.•• , I M.t.L""fi
i~.~•_-, tG·llli,l')'.',.~4 l.JEI.I..
~iFI 70,1<;:;:~~·,7•~•~0 WEU ..
:•4r;, ·10<1n:::~::t?"l'l L-Jl:I.L
11'1 f(;,.10.~,•\1.U:t4 IJEl .1 .!.i
1:.. ,. 1lD J; .JLU .. S
G ......
G
G .... -,. ...
ii-
---tr
-,:-
-"-
b-,_ ....
,~
" tr
r;
f,
r,-'-
1,
'-• ·'· f, ,_
r·
--"-r-
I'' ,. .,....
+
'" F--.. ----,--
A-
+
+'-
t--
1!!11!!1 ISi!
LATITUDE l.ONGilUl.lE
3515!5
~)
3:;1240
3~1110
,,.,,........;-
3511 iJ
-ik:i:l.72C.I
::,51 72
35fTl<j
Cc1C,17ll.
~ a::-1+_1-
El11500 ~.
011115
0j1230
~
UtOO·I.,
EJUlD 1..
818EH°2
O.l!~lt< -OTI71Tl
Sl17l8
f,)j_ 11:""3(► ···:,
~+--_....;__,...,._ -_, ....... --
-:"<~':--:"'I ':-7·--""""tT"r1':"1'",..... ~) ~,w ..... .-.,,.,
3!.i1111 IH 1::1')
j_; ~-t:.: :i
?.l.";tH"i_""
351200
3':,1:5::,(>
35142B
3'5105""<'
3~;.1.~;00
~
3:-:i134()
P.ifi'.J1!)
Al10()0
l'H C.H ()CL<>)'!
0113~1 /.., ,/f',IN'/1 Af.,;
0112~·,B
B11500
~
13112'~1 ~-~--~ ;.~~:l:!4~J 01:12:'.0I"' "(;~. ht-' e:.1e~-,, c, _,,,,,.:,---+e•J>-. •1•:::...,u
35J310 f.H12:~0 /ll/.
3:",1.:!0!J 0:1. I :~:!~J
:\, , ...
:.~~',1 :!('•'.I flt .1 :_,,){,
:3~',1 ::;c,~> r111.l,,,o
:s~t45~ 811~l~
:1::.2.-11-1 1.:,u:i.1:: iv,, :m"~--•• ➔0+1-s,~-_..,,....,_.
---
(
-----------1!11!1!!1
(d LllP-'E"
:·:t',',r:· (-• ,· 1-:,1:1_:,·; L,1;,11 J.; ::;;;r·1·1.'t ~:·t~:1Eh
,1:·:·:v1 :;;·<<:;11-n~;
.~'..:"/;~l•, LllW~l-llJl)E i1:._J10"/::.VJ / •JB.111:~0
1;:JC3 .1··t..1{SON
r )n::: 1-·,.,i::•u1 r,n nN w111::1< r·rnmi: · ,our::crc NAME
smmcc ~:our--cE
·1 YPE AVf',IL.
/7 1 3c'>'.">"_•~J Ii I Cl<lJI,;) VI l.l._,-,,.E. nl-lJ-•
l1JLl,Ci,.1 ,·_t_~Hf' /g 13r,:•:~•;> ..J,'\CK--,',---SHFU .. HI-If'
/ ~ 136:;>3~ 11m:N I wor,n MH~·
20 1:3,',::J.', 1<11.TM(lf<I;" F~:T,YIE!·: S/D
21 13!,2'11 Mtll.JNll'l.lr~ Vll..t.1\G[ MfU-'
ll. 131~24~! FflH.:FAX S/1~
2.3 13(,::.''l"l [!1-.;IMLf.: (l..El•IJ:1) h:LNl,1L
;:.!·.~•0 cCE•r· ·r _,,,: ·:·o
" +c
c,:
C
C
C
r:
I T.;!IF'EI",: !'Y C
f; .,.
i,:lc,256 fE J' I e ·o;e ftl:Ji( .Jill
l..'t 1 :~:,~•,•,r:, Ndf.: 11 IWUOPG Mt 11 · .1.r .1 :5.,,_,:>,">i' or,K1 .1:.Y r-·r.r,1•:
(/lll-tt.·1 I 11.·1< ;:'.
'.1./, l~/,'.'..',H IJLD l"h!hfJl'.•f.'.l•!U. !:/[)
l-1 1:\~,::·,-1 k,'.H~ tllll
:~~
>,-,h•'"•+:'--.,1 ii · .::l.8 1:v,:1·'/'.' :~II.VI r-::·,11IHi "!)
1'-l i:s.•,'.'.:.:-.i '.:tllllll I ,',NI :,11,:n1,,1i;!ll(•'
")JJ:~<'►::11.~ !all:<l.l!\J:,·,N t1111:•
31 1:,r.~::i·: w1:.i;1.1.~ .-,c:1;-r::;
j2 1:1/,;•:1",• Wlll!Pl.,"\f/1.' ,",r:1,1:
1
tw..i::.....t:J<.Ci.
Nfil i. I Id I ?'?ll
.• .. · .. \. I iNI \.'If 1.1 "
1,:,.'. '··', l,.11 lt'lJ•I I I •.I I · ./I·
lJ,;tl 11 .. +·t i,t1---:--i-~·:·
1,1~:--;--:-P,--:·1,
"
t:
C
-P.-
c ,: --4::
r: ,: ,:
.+-
I:
t:
I:
/'
,:
,: ,·
J l',O Wl:.LL ,: l.
-4.o .~:!
00 70-\Bl,0331:.~ \Jl:cLL -': 1
70 704111',7Trr:~ I.IE.I. L
11 704:_;,,-,:.06~1:"o IJEJ.r. : I
·1 ~:'.'; 70'\Ui,:·ifJ:-.8::Ci WELL -; l
:.!'10 704U'...i'12137'1 WELL
•\() "/O·lt.:l',43'/0'/ I-IEU.
ol m·
., .. Hl"'Q2P7'' t"EL.1-
·n m .. H.0-1 ; w,-:1. L.. ·•oip·•,ai;,r-,n 11p ,_
0;;9 ?Q 181 ·e·i'EI? bi!F.:LL 1:'!
1~-~ -ZP1,...!":¥DEl9 IICLL 1·5
qp, 7E 18 '527051 'IC:U. t 1
7(.1-1(1/,,',40:'.!3 WELL .,, • ~,oo 7(H7~415:W WELL .;.;•
360 ,·r· 1."i'.-1H,.Vi' liF:LL -':.I
7rn 71;.1n:.'.•l2!J7'i' l,Jl':LI ..
1.:•l 7<'·111~,.'.0'I~;:; l,Jl~I l. I.JC ·--~'IH{01••.-IICI T
Ill ···: 1f! ... :e,ss IWl..l ..
'I b<' ·1•'.J·HI'.~ 1~079 lJFI L.
·1\: fJ(",r):'. •·:".;!,(;,I t.11: 1 I
wi:i.t. -:-1
1 HJ i''.'•~fl.'., i''l~.,~~-1 ~JELL
1 ~'.!. ;,,:i.,:~:·/4•10'/ WEI.I
'• -, I
, ,.:,:..I tJLI L
' C?~. ·.-, -;<C-..:€8~C~?4:lHB~<+li'-.1-.~dBcCL L ~
1ao
<1'7 .:
l·JCI.I_ ,',. •.r,:· ~:·~·:·;-> 11,...! I .,.~.
·,;i .n.: .. :.::--;,1; ,ttc: .• L 1.•,
704n:·!•l:'!B "I'} WEI .. I.
t!'I. 1 1.' 1U I [LI
70'W:'.•l2D7'! IJEl..l. l , ::. 'I,~~ ·::-.c~r7, C!.' 1,•,;
II). 1. di, JU.I_ t,!...
1e· ·•:.SI nCLI. 11
~-,1 "/(.•·ltJ(.)\)!,l\ l,lf-.11_
1. ·1•:• /(i 11.C -:::r1 ,"/ \,II 1.1
·h, ','(l•lf/:·:.1:~ff/'I WU.I
:i:·-;5 11no:,:·!::::-:;c< .. o"/ Mr] .i . .: j
t)I.Lt.
'x!l~LL
G
__,::_
G
r.
r;
r.
G
G
;;.
ti-~-....
" -6
G
r;
-G-
r;
(~
"--
',--
G ,.
C
-"-r.
1;.
r;
r.
G
r;
r, ---ii
G
~
r;
,.
F·
r· ,.
F· ,.
,. ,.
,. ,. ,. ,.
r· ,.
f'
r·
1; f•
1; 1·
G I' r: 1 • ,,_ .,....
(. I.
1; 1·
f; I'
G 1·
,~ r . ,.-·---,--...._ ~-
Lt1r lllJUE" l 0Nr.11ut•f."
:!~141<]
3b~ 11 □
3~1130
3::;1~;:,;o
:<1~;1 :500
3:::,1-1::,'J
3:,1200
.3:~i1.300
iilEitt 00
3S11CL au lit 3
:3-L11-s
il6 '.i iT ~.
3~::i1600
3::i1310
3,E;l3i9
'._5'!'",14J5
3:~ l :!:~•:.> 3•·, -~·,-o
3Ct>nn
3:-;1-11 ~;
:'i: i 1 :~ l :.-
: 'i~i 1 4'.~0 ar, q-,;•,
35 j_ 1~~0
3:-',1 ~;1 ::.
351 j(. _
3~14<1::;
;, _ts;;
3i;,2,11.
3S1'11 t
?151 '..!i:!
:\::"",1 1 3.,,
:~
~ ~. ~.
:~:-ii .H :;
.1'. ·, I ~~• ,. 1
:~•
j~~l 4t•{,
;-~~•I ."H,1
:1.
.i •.
l111~~-~u
l:111.J50
ll1.14~5:;';
011-11:.::;
0 t {)'",'(J t
f.il 141'...0
El\ 1040
t:!111:{0
'J 1 t 0
EIS .>
s_ as•1!~
~
~ ...
011~00
BJ 15~l0
(Jiif:99
Bll-105
1.11:,,,0 n2 1 ~·,o
Ls i:s:!.
fll \'10:'i
Hi I r,:;1,
1111'.::,J(J
n~ 1r:rn
1.11.11 l ()
(;j ! :uo
~
I~
,,,i(Jt,_l)
Ci -F. I .. ',
01 1 ";:,t.;,{',
IHIIC.J::i
0111 •>
IH it, l(,
f'~Q-"[">
FJ113:~o
~J --~)
111 t:'1 {.J
Ill Cr,•1/,
~~
I:\\ o•~:~3
f, l ()•,·.1:-;
liililD
'-
, IJ I\
' ,. --- --------- --I!!!!!!!! !!!!I == -. ·r\r•• ;/,: I ;, :;;,-,;: r..r:. l'"tl!•I. ,,· w,·111.i:.: f,lJl·•►·•.Y ·;Y:\!EI', ,i1'. l r Vt-: SY:>TEMU ()•L"l~' .. ''/•1 l,l··.10; i',"! l llll•t·.:. '.\::-1n,,.... ·:i~~,7~!·.",, i.oti,-:rruT>r:: r'-\lj()T.5{; {)rJ1 l'"t:'/i HES. f-•EF,•~:, JN ~,uuRCE ~•u1u;;;_;r_ l"ff·'E r.vr.IL. ;·w:. L!;. I,-; 1!.",;\I 1'J 1.'it,:11; 1,11! ;1:\.-1":,;1 ·,1 ''.-1· 1·-.,!·l~~·---i-+--"-;,'!• l/C 1:\,',:\.-;1i '.-;,,11111: 1,1,r~;r :::✓-i., :.,,.-i:,.•,.Lh' ;,r1r ,;1::,1'!i '11 J j.'.J"'.', 1:,:,~:11 f.W;'.Jtlll S/ll ~~-•.'l IIIJI !" 'I l.{1,:1:,:• CH.Ill t.,'IMI-· l'l.,i(J: ~J 1:·,1 . .:1::,, ~i!Otll"Y 11r,~:,:; ~~IH~l.•IVl:;111N \/•/ 1~/,:\1,\) ltl· llli\1,1)· MIU' ~h--+,e'>,;;;,..,...,;;.-"'-,.HF '-f') l .3t,:'i i.5 ~~Hl'\PY /,:~:~> I NH ClW\t1UrH'J Y t1.l, ,)ltli,1111) \U:t ;3....,__ 'll 1:,.,.-),",' :~t~(tl.J:]IHII:" MIU'• •n 1:11.3110 1:11A1·1:r. ,,c1-:1:'.; ,11i•· '--IS 1;1.-:-~10-, :;1·;,r,1-:111.J Mill" 1./~ l .. 'i,',.'i!l'..' C~!l'JIIJ[".f:1N n:u· 1 '.1 !\' I /J!, I' JI'/ I 11 U !'.r_l\'[rl(,l!JN r1111' 5:J 1:=,,._.:ltl.', I'.• M hLtitt,L st.1:'i(,31!~, 1111':1•:t!l':"i' Chl:I·]; ~;/J.' 0 C SJ lJt,4.;,.+.-+--J.I-H-+~·1·1:1·1·'.'tl~r-1 -~, Cl-n::,c.:i: l ~.-,~t-. 1-+:tttttt,1~~---f"t'rf..._.-¥.',-f•--f;.HHl •:I '.l t ~~-4~·-· -~-~~,.l-4• l~~/,-l:"/ !-:tll<//J(J!,11/ll ! t.1•r 1~"°~---->,.<.;~~+il :;1· 1 ~\. '~ 1:~r,4.',-~•·"'T71'1:--rfT"t-! illJ11iC. ,·1 ,\lid (JlcJ 1 :,,-,:·,.~ •l r~11,·,1 ·1. t. ,:1<rr.1[ i:u,,., ~:t":I 11JnL 1~ ,·,_:· _,.,, .n.,+An1. :1·5.:,:·,,11 ,-=~ Lh:';(j? , ' .H11• ,1. }:._ ,.,.~, .h l't.". c, .. u · 1·1ci:i:· ,: ';: ! H-tr-tt--•++-:;. ~-+=.:.-01-Jl-,,-J,:+I . \·,: :v,-ir~l ill• t'o'f: l H ~ I IJ ,,,·: I :~.-.:.·,.',., 1·1 ~i~-r--tt--r-. . .: I:·• r,11.1.> !.1..il.1U!1t1 I~ ..• .,r: i. -', 1....:.,r,;;.i:,.;..,:..1.. MV ·•·1 · '"" . t, trtr,--:-t~-r:--::--1-c· ~ ;+,..:,,i:--t-'-·...:......,..,..r-1t+ ·,·, ,·.1.~~~-~----;..;,...;......-1 .l..!h~ --~ nTr. ·( )F'I.JI .. ,"d : UrJ tJIJl~J( F'"HLINE ~iOURl:f NhME 1·; .....;. ,: C' l: +; l: I: I': l: l: C l: ,· ,. i'; " ,· ' r: <: ,.,__ ,, .. ;+-,, ~ ,,_ H· [· ,. e-,_ .,_ ,. e. H-·.,.. .,,. ,._ ,.. " ~-.,., .u ,., H· .+; :·-:40 !ll•IE;"::'12.f~·19 WEI L'J 'l{l ···» ,·v~ l~!.~ -~-IIEUr ~ :!4 "/()'1fJ24:..~tJ79 WEI. L /,0 '"1()'1fl~'l01.·H WEU .. ls.;; 7(MEl6~,2 ·:n9 WEU .. -; :!. ~ l '11 ?045:~:.;·r•,.-•J() WCL.I. :.it, 701\Hc'."I 74/,9 WEI .I .. .; 1 ·1:·; "/tl•Hlf.>11..fit~ IJELL -: 1 6:·; WELL ~ 1 I t ·, t'. HI£ ~•."?:[,i9 WEI.I-I\ ~ii', 70'16'.''l:!:·,.{2 WELL -: l 1 ~:iO "/()•1!:l.','.'·,:.'i:;03 iJE.I .L : 1 ,~;2·-:;ff'•··-:•·"" t'C'I ~-! 01 "/i.HOf>-1,()/.'.'0 I..JEU. ,:-1 ~:>110 wF:u .. ,: 1 ::t,O ·_.y,(j l.JEl.1. w..cu_ .-::.'. -!,:O 70•U.:·•J'.'i'..'2 \. WF.:L L -; 1 :•:., "/041-l-'•l,l\~i:;3 WELL ~ 1 :.~5 70'1:U,:~<1:!•l:'i tJEU. -!1 ',-~t-418-.L TV, Jt~ .i I(. , ·1 ,dLl. L 7P .0 .. '(Wi_ 1 IJLI. 1. , (>I.' ?CHI!/·' i'lC•:·ou WliU. 'i'G \U,~, ,Dc,ib tO:t:1.1.. , _ ,:.-; ·, .: Gt,, 1 •.. ::6 Wl.1.L. ;•:, l:M,.n,;··1. b:IL.:1.1. ;~-/ "/0•181..l,l',l ()0 WCLI. ..,C •r,~ ~-r-. l C! LIE-I L 1 q:, "IL H1. :·:·•,ff lt HELL 1·•:: 7(l 1QC, (' HQ II,-!'. 1:n "7( ,u~ 'l'.,-~;, 1.•CLI. 6C' -,,, ,,_,, 1•-·,,-•1 110 L · ~<<H+-7{.\~Q 1Si:11 l'CI_I_ '.,.J,; ·; J l.)Ji d.· .)l b,lf:1.1 . * ~ -~-:, • r. .,,.... ,. r. G .,,_ I. ,: ,. ,. G ,; G ,. G ,. ,; f; L '· [. ,; ,, ,~ r. +-,. ,r,--·&-'r-tr---.... -<.-G ,c -,.-f;--<e-t,-..,._ .,.._ C-... ..,... ~· e-,. -+-,. ,. " ...,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. r· r· ,. ,.· ,, r· ,. ,. , .. ,. ,. + r-r-,. .,_. I'--,. " '"-...;.:;._ ""'-r· .., ,.... +--F-· ~ -~--+-"->-.,.. L,".\T!TUliE l.CJNctnmE 3~}206 ~ 3:i1210 3'51145 3'!:i1436 3:.',t600 3~l 14~.i 3'!',1200 ,,,,,,..,,, Ell 1'.:·,)I) fh~l c~ 1 :',Of, I~ 1 l 14:"i (h1~:t6 1:11•100 I •JI. e11:-,11::, El\. J.ClOC, .,,....,.., 3:Ji3 . .K> b1J.·1:::,~;, 35121b 011s1<) ·i,::11:,10 tJ ,eu d> ~Sti1'5 flit~,)() 3~~1 :!1 '1 1:1 I '1:!0 ~-! 3!'il 200 1.: l I ~:.J)O 3~•lL~7 u11::1 :~~;1 t:n 1,, 1,:-,•;:, ~::-,\14'1 F1l~1··,;:. :..1~-,l ~.JO() U t l :;10 :,;~1:!0<'.> l:11'1:~? ~ t~. :;s .. 11:; r.1.(¥-1-1~', 3,,1-•1.l (.J 1 ,o-· 3~ .1 ·~·~o ~~:;. :551 :i.,~-; ::1 t'..".10 ~-~~ ~~ :.u-,11:G f.t()( :~~IH:.66 d11(,M) 35114:"i fl1J~',()0 ~.\L-. .:.:.,) [~) ac.·1•·90 · H'?Q ~ ~ ;.~':''!?Q ,_~.,l ~, ~-,(J -"'+=<---~w~, ~ .;..,..+-+!-,-, ~. -·~•.:., ": ~ .+' . ,,,.,.,...,, ____ =,·· ~~,,..~-~.cc:. r-:-w:-i ,.,
1t~tr•t 1 rt•tt1rtt•~~,,r~t+rtrttr ~
,T
~+1 tr1rlTtT111r+rtrr1tr1rtyT+11t:!t
' ,... .-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .,
I
I
I
I
n
D
u
n
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '.
CENSLS '90
•
··-··· ~-:,-:';,f .. :--~•.Y' ·: :·,c,-; •: ·>. ·".'.-~•-·-:.·.;~•,.0• :,,.::,,· ·_-.-,.·: .:.~-:,.,;.-,.,;-·:.~:-.-;:,'.:: ·:. :: ·,.:; .,;:•:-.;·: ·v·_._--,·· ..•.. · ,,_,·•:. ·~_,:-···::-: . ~~<~~?'.: .: -.. ~-;~~:-/::
·,:..:_::.;.·_~-:
1ts .A.. ,u.:.u.,--w:: cwarn& ~~ V418z::t:r:!l:r ~ ~ 5~,.,._~
fi?A t.W°J.
""""-I 5Crl'll'../;J,'::" =-1€"~3 iiiizi'
~-
CffJ'ffl'PiF"rmr;;:;;:-,
··•!.::';'.· ..
1090 Census of
Population and Housing
Surnmary Population and
Housing Characteristics
North Carolina
: ,. :: ... •_:• • . ";;r :C'.-~:: . • • • •·. __ ;-.__. ,J;-.,..,·.;u. • .:.·,,,..,;,.
. .. --::•; .. --,,·.,:;::· ... : ... ~.--\-: -.. -=--•·~ .·,. •• _,,,,.; • -,, •• -•-:---: < -•' . -.. ~··· :•,• <·~:·.,:~_;-.:::"•''
,M,M+Fr
X
4ti-Jii!P.WWWC:&JtP';',iji(fiJ;u:wsao&t%.tfu
i I ,
I
'1
I
1·
I
I
fable 5. Household, Fomily, and Group Ouon,•rs Characteristics: 1990-Coc:
State
County
County
Place
Subdivision
Fo,1yth (OUtlty ••••••••••••••••••••••
Abl:>olh (rtfl IOWMhip •••••••••••••••
HIQh Poinr city 1:,1.l. ••••••••••••••
hrM!1VIII~ !owr. \rl .I.
St«jt (;Grdtn (OP (pl I •••••••••••••
Bfle-1 Crtti. lo-1>1hip : .•••••••••••.
B,:llonio 1:r,,·nship, ••••••••••••.••••
~u<ol f-!c:~ lo,<n •••• , ••••• , ••• , •••
·s1orJtyv,llt (OP:~,) •.... ------···
~•·JJjtx,~ l<~n\hip ••••••.•••••••.
s.-dg! Ga,~tn CD~ ;~1 , . ___ •...• _ ...
(l,mmon1~.i. 1own1hi() _ .• _ ••••••••••.
(ltmmons ""°9t lpt.! •••••••••••••.
(flntrlvillt tcwn1h;p •.•••••••••••••.
r.r<r,11·,,l;t town [pr .i •••••••.••••.
S#d9t G¥c!tn COP (pr.: ••••••••••.
tf.,,h-,jjt township ••••••••••••••••.
C~mon1 ,,;11o9, (pl ) ••.•••••••••.
h...;1vJ:t COP •••••••••••••••••••.
1,Wld!, lo,\ iown~p •••••.•••..••..
S1onltr,i!lf CO? (pl.) ••••••••••••••.
Wcl\tno-,.n 1°'""' (01./ •••••••••••. •
W-1111:on-Sc!een ,iiy (pr) ••••••••••••
Oki R,c~.mond :owr.1'•i; •••••• _. _. _ ••.
(~ (lfy (pl.)••••••• ••••••••••.•.
Cl~ lcwn 10 .. 11~ •••••••••••••••••.
Sronlt)"\-,11t CO? (or.I •••.••••••••••. Wonst-,n,Sa:,m ciiy (pl.I •••• __ ••• _ •.
SoTtm (nop,: row•u~? ••••••• _. __ ••••
Wofl.tn~v,n 10we. (pl,) •••••••••••••
S.C,.111 fo1~ t0wr,1hi~ ••••••••••••••••
V.',M:cn-S.,!,m c,•1 (pl./ ••••••••••.
Vit"-"10 !Owt\lh.,:) •••••••••••••••••• ·,•:,ni:on •o·..-nir~D ••..•••••••• _ .. w,niroc..S,:i:tm cir1 (pl.! •••••.•.
F,cn1.:,., (o...,,ry •••••••••••.•••••••••.
l?"o"'Vlip l. °""" .................. .
SuM TC,.i'I ••••••••••••••••••••••
lewr,1~.ip 1. UJ•111 ••••.••••.••••••.
Jo,.n1-•i~ J. Ywn:;~,.1:, •• · ••••••••.••
Yt'"J"',WiUt rown •••••••••••••••••.
Jo...,vlio ~-FranrJin1,-, ••••.•••••••••.
frcnll111lo)r, town •••••.••••••••••.•
lo .. n~o 5. i-lo1·n .. tt ••••••••••••••.
T 0wn1h;p 6. S-onCy (,ttl ••• _ •••••••..
lo,m1r.;o 7. G'Jld MIN ••••••••••••••
Cen:,r..,llt 1own •••••••.•••••••••.
;,:;wn1~0 6. Ct~, Re<I •••.••••••.
lawn1~~i, ~-(yp,n\ i:rtt• ••••••
l0M1~i~ \0. iou11:•c•~.
L01.i1':u,~ :~,.,, •••••.••.•
!';~1:ce. :=,····•• .•.••. (~f,,.,,,11, rc.,~1,.:~ C~t,,,,·,,1:1 c,:v •• ·c.,~-·.,. ;~""" ..
(,0·~~1a .\!J,,.,,~;•. :~ .• ,.,.,: .... .
Dn11 ... ,, :;~ n, ............... .
:i~1·or.•J c•:,· •~: 1 •••.••
~:t,q1 \lcu•.:=•r, ;,c, (~·
0~1:c1 '•'""'•'r• ..
():.a:1 tow' .•.
Go1:,-,,:J ,,;--,· :~• I ••
1',.;'. ~~~J•1 (,' •..••
•c.-:~ '~'"'" ;=• J ••••
•:,~11,•• ~ 1;~n1,',•~ _
'.:;i•·,,.,,.: i1.-, :~· I •• _
;J ... ' ;,•
~: ... _'.' ;: .;:, • •r
·n,•oos '.J~~,n-~,. ~~:,.,. .. ,.,.;:~ ,,,_
~c•,i_.,.,:~n 'c,., ·,·,,ii-.,,, ,·-··>'••
90 NORTH CAROLINA
r,,,s.,r,1 ~•
•~uu,-,,ld1
lF .:66
11 151
' '51
1 1?~
1~5 '7 I
~s1
'" no
.:?t-
5 OJ>
"' 5! ~
ll
"' 1" J 21j6
~ ;32
!H
! ! j
!~
:i :Gi
10 s;
6 C-68
1 on
. ~ j)}
97()
101 .:1·,
4 /,l(l
'
f,..-~.-1,,.,,.
-.,,;,:,, "' ,.,,~.,J
r-n~nr
':
!it--;\>'r.1,!~, ·,,.,.,/ .,1-...,, ~----· -----·
lo1c:I
)4 792
"' " '" m
I ]07 , m
60~ '
I O~i ·
J.: .
OH·
J-n !
2 J2S ' , n~:
' 91~ : • I.: ,
~~e , 6~~ ;
' "' 1'15 ·
I I IE . -' s,~ :
t3 6Si:·
.J i,J.~
l,(//,
19 S11) · no!
1:i j
i), : 1es ;
l,:(! :
].:5
SIS s,;; .
'' s~; :
3~7 : 98:-·
"'
:m
-:
..
i
'", i
I I
2 -~O
1 ...
1 OJ 1.5~
1.c-: 1 s,
},.:.' -: ].:
1 ::~
l j~
1 ,:-
1.l,f,
U,9 1.S 1
1 i.:
H•j 1 ,,
1 ~) l.~.-, .
,.,, ... ..,,, -·-:-·-·· ... ----.. .
i : :
0 land Area and Population Density: 1990-Con.
,:, ;r ,ymr-.'" ,,•e :,•,1;
U:e I
f Subdivision
!
!
-,---L. .. ;rl!ort,l
----.,.--------·---
~t-,.,,,, 11"'·· i State --+-' County \ ! ] County Subdivision i Sq,,,.:i·, ,;.;. ),,,1...a•f I Sci,..:·,... )<1.-1•• • Pl m· 11.1 Pt•wr.1 , .-..... , ,...i,: i ~•··,·,, · ,,,·Ir I ace ----:-----i--------,----·-•· I ·-•·•·
I
~, !,, ..
I'''" ,, .... •
,•, 10,.n1:S.1
•;ltm '"""'', .l•t, .. ,,. ' ...
•\vd,t !,,,., ·," I
.,It IJ,.,,,~,
,1vJlt _,,,,.., •!" ' · .. .,,o,, ,,, .... ,•,~.
.,. ~n~, ...
~n ln-n,~•,·
. (,"I IJ"'"'"'II.
to·,.nih,p
JIil 1{'_.,
. . . . . . I
.. I
;,\.ln IJ.,.~. _ I ·:vn! Q1.,, •~----l~I I
~-, ,Jwn\h.o~ ..
.lff;_ IOM,\~~ .••.•• ,,.
nt•fll low.;·····•••••········
i>ev town •.
I -~l'~f/:~:: .. i;.~i_:::::::::::::::: i ,~~nwi11, 10 .... n •••••••••••..••.•••
""flt IOwnU°.,:> ••••••••••••••••••
ovillt town ••.•••••••••••••.••
loci rown~;p •.••••••••.•••••••
1'0liG 10 .. n •••••••••••••••••••
1-:111 r0wn1h,p •••••••••••.••••••.
. \~! :::: .:~:-\·:::::: :::::: :: ::
•• town1h,p •••••••••••••••••••
t ',::: .. ·::::::::::::::······
• 10 .. n1h,p •••••••••••••
-~:l.J.., IOwn ·~············ ·1,.-;:>t !:)¥ot11fup •••••••••••
:~:~·:::············· : \
"f-•,.nl~'II •••••••••••
. II"'• c,ry :p1 ; •••••••••••..•••. i I :.[3:[;;''.'\:::): :): :
~f to-,,,Mh;p ., ••••••••..•.•.• :
. :,!: ~'6p I~~!.::·:~::::::::::::: i I;:, 111wn~•p •••••••••••••••••••• i ,:~ti H,111own !p!,l •••••••••••••• '
'IC"' c;ty !:>t J ••••••••••••••••• !
•.i,•~t IOwn lo!.) •••••••..•.••.
.. ~'X! er:-: w.1. .••.•...
1-I~:;~~~::::\::
•P 1. lJv,.r• (~n.io, .•••
''" to"'n .•• : ••••••..
,·,; ~-Uc,(tl (c.~PTOP ••••
I-'.~ .. ; '.t~;;.,·c;;r·,·::::·:
t S. l<.l"'<' 1,1h<nq (rn<
,1, 111·,.n ••••••••••••
I
I
I
I
: b. Upn, f,,11,,..; Cru•
.. '' ,· :,,,.·, =~• . • : .,, ,,.,. • ~ : r,•
\•~-~,-,:1:;, !I'! '·
,, .. ·, •~~·1~,p.
.·• '""'""'~. ,, •'· ·;,· I.
(:\(" '.: ·, .. ~,~-,.
1! ~5~ l •.=.: :
·, 7ll.:i'.
? SC,..: I ; s
1 990 I
I /;,JI I S
4 l;,)o ;.: ~
?I'.
7 01..: ': l
3 39; t ]<:~ < 3
)? ~~~ ' I 3~; I ? 11,;5 '~
) 17'..'
.!Si ;
10:
OC•~ !
J -~t~ :
]..:..: :
2 ?: :
) 6i! i· 65(' I ; ?
5 :H ! , i
](i
185
' 76j !-' ::
I 227
I S~:;
5 ]9"! i 2 95~ i
2 :;: :
:a I e1: ,
7 O?~ ms1;.;
1j1;, rn !
13 eei j
It. I
3 90( !
12 f-i! i . 3) : ,i I)';,:, : :;
11 'JO~ ,
l ! ~
"
~,, ~~.:
!c, 1.:...: i
!~ !
11 0'.;i · s~:: . ,.,
1~; ;
e(,~ :
I ,,: : '
I(,:
..:J..: i
's~ !
,~ '. I
i\1. ; j i: ! ; I
Q) ~ :
t I? I
I 1 '.~ !
-l,1 1
t•,·. ' ;1;~ ;
/! w::
~G.'. 1:•.
: i
~':,' i I .:.' ~ l:l\ J: ,._,,,,!~ .-.... ,, .. 37.2 j : ~ :s ;': 1 ,\1,,1.!=,· ;,.,. :.-.... ,:••·-4~ 7 i :: ! ~~ (• ~J~~1,,,,::,, ~C'~ ;. · 5~ I I :.-4· 146 l \~r.•~r,,,._.,. ,~,. 1; ~ 1, ii~ 1~~ ~ 11°.t\:
1~:::t~:..,:i:~.;-
·., .:~;-~ :; I J II •.,•:,; .,,, ,:·· ·
I I \Jl,I ;~,,n '•""""~;, 47 i f. 4 i.:~ 6 -.1.,,1,,,,,.,, ([)~ '; ·
~.?' :;~ > ~-n .: ; w.,,w,,-~Jl••-. (''• }J.S _::a ;ra :,.,;,.,"o,,,r.-:,,,,.n:·•·
m.~
38.1
BJ.j
H3 . ,n
' I
35 j ]
9~ .1 1
' 18
107 A ,.,
97.1
1.2
55.4
1.0 SU
l
24.9
I.]
47. I
5~ 0 j
Wcl;,,,~._., 1<•.,.~
~•'··" '.;:\ 'l"•-•1!,.:
\,·,-,1!r ~~'••r, :·•·· -.,,,._,.,.; •~"''""~ .. \':·ni•cr, •,,,,-:;·,r .. ·.•:,.-i:,·,•'-'.;·• ,.,
JS l i :,,i6·•r :.-,,-•;
51: i l.w·i!·~; ('_.,.,, ..
3-_,i;:0 I ?-, ... •·-~c ..... . JC'5 ,) ! '•""v-~ :. -'.;,iii •• t,I;: !e,.n11•-~ ~ •~--'"'i\'. ,
33.1: ~o~r-;..-i,t •~"''·· 4!-0 .', I !1> .. ,1n•, .;_ ;,~nH,.~·
S'i.? I f:o~,~,·,,,, r.;-,,r. .••.....••••...•. 771.5 l11w,i1~;~ 5 ";~,t~••,i ...•••••.....•• n.6 ! it'>.n1~•0 !--~;rciy (,,, •.••••.••••••• ,~,.o 1 !0 ... ,,,h,o i, (-.,Id/}.·•; •••.••.••••••••
12 9 LMl!Ni.~ '"""····•·••···••••···• 6.7 !n ... n,~~ I!. ~ic'oi ;,.;:• .•••••• : ••.•••
11 l.0
990.0 ..:o 2
r0,.r.1h.o 9. ,:-,,,t11 ·:·•~; ••••••••..••
Jo,.,n1••~ :o \0o.a1bv·; •••••••••••••••
l()l.ll!but~ ,,, . .,n •.••••••• .' •••.
,~-~ !
??O 6 I
1A..: '
1
94 l j t;ci:1>n (r~c.·, ..••••• -~; 1 i (1>,,,.,.-.,~,, •:·~·,~.,. • • . I (~~:,-,-...":~ :,:•:
1-2.',.7 : U1i,,.,,,,_·:::."···· (:c,..~r•; ·:~---"-::,,, , •. ~·
··· 1 ··-
i7.3 i
1;,1.~ I
"' I .I
69.0
4).8
11
J I
45,)
' l
''
'"_· 1 I 37 ..:
1.0 I
9.1
AQ.5
' SI ..:
l
JJ.6
)l ' ' 54.4
;2 ]
'~: 1 !i: 9
(:? 7 , .: 8
37~ ~
.:.9" ;;5,1
~ ' ! ~ 0
6-:0 0
: i J
..:~..:,::
SJ., l
~~ I ? : B~;:t,CI• ·>, c;,.,.
-::~1::· .. ~ (,'.; :~,
~,~1 ::.e,•M~·n i,•·,
. . . -. I
i Oi :;_; i
t..:?.3 i
160 o.~ •
001101 1own1• .. ;:, ••••
0otlc:1 10wn ••••• .... :: :'.'. I
2~!; I
.iC ~:
35:.~ : 21.). I esu ,,,, '
nn1 i' i 1 ,
J~ 3 1' 72()::, ,
1;_1, I
1;~_1 I 41 ~
I~~ ;
11 i /
G~110ll'O C:~1 l~: ; ..........• , •....
rl,;h ~•ltity •••....••.•.••.....
Scnto :t-.,, (pt)
~;~nl,1 :o .. ·-lp!.t ..••••••••••••••• ·:io11oni11 1cwr.1~ip ••••••
G01lonio <•~/ (~:.:.
lowtD c::~ 1pt ) •••
~er.la •0•~ Opt) ••
$,:.,_,,~. (·c1•~,·~ c::. ~~~'""' •:., .. ,.•.:,,e . c., . .,::,s.i !~wf.\,;; ..
:.'.t•.;f,ll'C'ly:,•; ;·
W'IC'' .".".:.,,nl~•"' •: .. •.
S1r.n't> •·: ... ~ ;~: , . s.,.,,~ p.,,,.-. :(•,..~1• -~
e,1mon1 : :, ••. (,or,i,:e•. •;-,~ •
Gc1ro•"c :,,, :~· Lo,:,i! ,,,, :;: ·
1/tACtn,.r., ,,: .. , •. I
i iif.l O: C:~•~1 (~~n,,
',J,t : -~~••1 :,:Ii r: ,,.>"'•~ . . . . . . . . . !
·1 8f..<J '., ! G,,,,i•:• .. c ''·"· .
)J l . r•a,·1,: ,,.·-1'·: . ,;.-..:, ~.,,., ..
.. ,,.,,,,,,1.,i:, ''·'•""':
~ •. , .... ;1•." '•
G,~I,)" '·""''''. ,:,...,,c', ·, .. n1~-o
~ot,b,n1 ,.:,, :~.,, ..
~,;,.-~,ri)'· -~ .. , ..
,,.,:.,, i: .. ,. ''. .,,,··
::: ; ! ',,;,,:,:: '::::· 'C•
/'/I .: I f.••1:•, , ... J -~.,r•,:·,;· I~"] Uu,,~,_11, -~ .. ,.,~,,
.('.6 ~ Eu•N•• (,)O.
I 1,52.0 I (rr,dmoo• ,,,1 •• 171 J ;;,~,'"'l C1t•< •o-n1•.·;. ~~~-j I uc2','..~i'~o~\:;; i .:/1 ', 1 (),•c1d 'Cw~·.·••~. nt a I c-,10,~ o·, ,o, ·
111 8 : Soi•,,, 1ow,,,r,:,.
~'1.1 ~ j '..<,c,cl1a1 fc,;. 10-n;,·;
. ! ~•~•nH :c-n .
;y1 ~ I rorL1 llo 1O .. n,~•:'
I 111 C 1 ~''"' "•-n ;_1,1, ~ ! '.\~Jn,,, ,.,r-,, •~-r.·.;
i
i
1~1
IJ?
")
" 4 t.9-t
S lll7
IO
ll
' 0'8 I 087 em
"" •.:J 471
!JJ 4 IS
h JL4
.: 9)1;, , ..
3609
J 684 ,,.
b 970
I 615
1 5l6
2 154
),0
"' I 961;,
I 172
7 917
] 037
175 093
1..: OU
.: 756
IO
'( 4) 1
4 698
3M
'" IS 37)
) 012
601
'" : ~ 54S
54 \ 19
; 6SO.
! ~87
"' l? 405
! 519
20
l 3S7
" "' I ; 4)4 .
1 )71 i
(47 I
7C~ I ~~~ I
: JOS : 1eo I ::oa i
iSJ , no:
~]6 I
it.? ! :-011
~t./} I
!
,1c i
!:ii I "' I ,,
;)} . ~~7 i
0, '
::~ )4 ~ !
-: lSJ II :. ~~9
.: ~79 . '.,04 :
JC7
'" '"' Hj ,,,
'81
;86
•,(!9 I ,., I iJQ
1;5
lond ou•o
ns
! n5
' ' 87 ,9 ,.,
1:U
' '" 18).tl
lilJ7
273.2 129.1 ,..
149,6
112.6
1.5
184.1
20
87.J l)U
101.1
' I 19.9
"8 15).7 . .•
913 4
i69A ,,
I ?6.:!
' ' ·' .S
151.3 J) ..
·' 182.8
71.6
I
" 17,..:
;
!44,4
I) 0
' ' ' ; ~9. l
I.: 9
?)
7
; ' J6
l6
,-------
~:,,o,t ~tlt•
n..au 1orrY111
:1:, ~ ' ~ I
JO; i '. nl I/
-

I

B.Y I I'' "'3 6 1 . 'I
;19 4 I
,1 o I
7•) Q I
. I · ,n 6 I
5-) I
.l
H.B
.:7)
' " ' 8
!3.7
lO 8
)9.4
l
,6.J
318 511.3 ,.,
JS6.5
65 4 ! J.61 I• ,s.a \ ~-~ ' .,
58.4
" ,.,
• 70 6
29.9
' I' '' .)
55.6
" ' i.6
~7 6 ,.,
Jo )
" . ..
"
;?'.! I :
'!,.: 7:
71~ ,i
]I I ;
)41 .:
oO)
n;t1
Sl1 0
530 0 ,,.
374 _.;
lk C
; ].: :
78,' ~ 16(• :
;n
?E I 160 0 2~. I
j6 •
282 I
37 ,9
80U
17 ~
1~.:
'" 16' J
11;,A
13.7
51.5
019 e .
189.6
!30
506 0 10,:, 0
! i~. I
j)C,,i
~ \ ~ (!
9,;.o
\21.~
8!i I
131.S
517.9 4!).j
697.,
569.3
JI'. j 11n
134.:
~;QC
Sv·J s~: ?
ii::.j
5!t ,;
?S! : :m~ 4,:,; :
:30 S6H
~~\ .'
~1)6 /
J/t,.7
l'.,5.9
Sill 0 IC\l 0
;,,;, 0
9!8 l
HJ 1
-
J: 1.4
I \JtO I
2 on a
); I
" ' 118.0
1;,2.4
'" ]Ci,.}
9'.0
2 019.8 ·
'
' '
4S.O
•2.4
)5.J
383.J
41.5
)5.5
lJU
598,4
491.1
115.1
321. l
100.0
295.3
3•2.J
530.0
~20 0
)1',6
151.4
336.1
16S.0
070.0
810.0
soo.o
819,0
Je3.l
)47,8
982.4 ,oo 0
:IJ.1
578 0 4!9 6
t,~S6
8'.i] J :-..:J 0
S9/.9
5 :9 5
[.: :, ;,.:
I 7;) 5
; ;,j 0 ,,::,
"
) :· ~ '.! 7 . ~7 ?
~~ I
; : : 1
\ I~ 3
;:,;i 6
i~.4
IC! 5
I 7,6 8
" ' 1; B .,, ' 4) i
; ;l I
; ~ ~
NORTH CAROLINA 241
'
D
I
I
I
I
I'
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Superfund Section Staff
Jeanette Stanley
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
January 10, 199.4
SUBJECT: Update on Status of Well Head Protection Programs in N.C.
I spoke with Carl Bailey, Groundwater Planning Branch Section Chief at [phone]. I
asked him about Well ·Head Protection Areas (WHPAs) in North Carolina. Mr. Bailey said tha_t ·
Wally Venrick, Public Water Supply Section Chief, would be the most knowledgeable person
on this subject.
I called Mr. Venrick at [phone]. He.said that North Carolina has extended an invitation
to communities to establish WHPAs, but none have been established. The cost to the
community of establishing a WHPA exceeds the savings realized from waivers for certain
analytical requirements. He does not anticipate that any WHPAs will be established prior to
1996.
-Mr. Venrick said that there are m1111mum allowable distances between wells and cenain ·
structures (e.g. 100 feet between septic tanks and wells), but distances are arbitrary and
vary depending on the structure.
Net.
I--¢• 1 .,..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·::r:·nn
Division
Reprint lrom tior1h Carolina Adminis:.aIive Code: 15 t,CAC 2B .0308 Current \hroug:l: June 30, 1989
.,
I
I -I -I
~
I -I
"'!
I'
f
i
i
i
i
• I
I I·
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I I
\
,\'(/CD -J;,\FJRO.\',\l!::\'T.-11. ,\!A,\'ACF.,\!l::VT
Tl 5: 02 8 .0300
SECTIO:--.0300 -ASSIG:'\,IE:\T or STR[A;\I CLASSlflCA TIO:\S
.0301 CL.-\SSIFICATIO:--S: GC:--ER . .\L (a) Schedule of Cla,si/ications. The classifications assigned 10 the waters of the Stale of North
Carolina are sci forth in the schedules of classifications and water quality standards assigned to the
waters of the ril'er basins of North Carolina, 15 NCAC 2B .0302 lo .OJ 17 which are on file in the Office
of the Allomcy General of ,\Orth Carolina. These classifications are _based upon the existing or con-
templated best usage of the various -strca,ns and segments of streams in the basin, as determined
through studies and evaluations and the holding of public hearings for consideration of the classifi'ca-
: tions proposed.
. (b) ·Stream :-Sames. The names of the streams listed in the schedules of assigned classifications were
taken as far as possible from United States Geological Survey topographic maps. \Vherc topographic
maps were unal'ailable, U.S. Corps of Engineers map,, U.S. Department of Agricultures.oil maps, and
:S-'onh Carolina highway maps were used for the selection of stream names. (c) · Classifications. The classifications ,ssigncd to the waters of ,',:orth Carolina are denoted by the
letters IVS-I, WS-11, \VS-Ill, ll, C, Si\, Sil, and SC in the column.headed "class." A brief explanation
of the "bcsl u.s.1gc'' for which the waters ·in c.1cll class mu~t be protected is given as follows: r'rcsh Waters
Class IVS-I:
Class IVS-II:
Class WS-111:
Cl,ss ll:
Class C:
Tiual S:ilt Waters
Cl:iss S,\:
U:i» Sil:
Cl:i,s SC:
,,·:itcrs prntcctccJ JS \'."Jtcr supplic:s wluch are in natural and uninhabited or rredominantly undeveloped (not urbanized) watersheds; no point source discharges Jrc rermined .'.lnd locaJ IJJ1d m.'.lnagement programs to control nonroinl source pollution ire required; suitable for all Class C uses; \\'atcrs protected as \\'.'.lier supplies which are in low to moderately de\'eloped (urb:inizc<lJ wa1crshcds; discharges .ire restricted to primJ.J'Uy domestic n·astcwJtcr:-or industrial non-process wattrs specifically appron:cJ by the commi'.-S;on: \oc:11 l.:.tnd m:inJgcrnent programs to control nonroi.nt .rnurce polluiion :.in.: rcquin.:t..1: suit:..ible for aU C!.:.iss C uses: H';.itcr supply segment with no categoricJ} restrictions on watershed dc,·elopmcnt or <lischarncs: suitable for aU Class C uses; primary rccreJtion :.ind ;ny other usage specified by the "C" classiGcarion; fr:ih and wilc.llifc pmp:..ig~11ion, secondary recreation, agriculture, .'.lnd other uses
rcq_uiring ,,:ate rs of io\,·t:r quJlity.
s11cllfishin:; for rn:tr~c: ruivoscs anJ any other usJgc specified by th-: "SB" JnJ
''SC" cbs5ir1c11io11:
rrirn~iry rt:cr<.::ctiOn :wd :111y other us;igc specified by the "SC" d:..issi:':cJtion; Jish .1nd ,,·i!J!irc prnr,.:q:;;,11io11, srcond:..iry recreation, and other uses r-:.~uirtl1g w_aic.:rs of }o\\Tr qu:Uity.
Trout \\':uers: Sui1.1blc.: ror nJlur.:i.l trout propJgaiion :ind maintcn_ancc. of stocked ::--:ui:
S\':;1mr \\':Jlr.:r:-;· \\':1:ns •,1·liich h:l\T ]011· \·clt1ci"iics :rnd other nJlural ch:.ir~ci--=.ristics 11·!:ich ;!n.: Jiffcrc11t from .:i.dj:..ic:nr sin::11ns; \S\\'. \·u1ricn1 scn.\!ll\T \\':1tn:i 1,hich require.: limitJtions on nutrient inruts:
Ol\ \V: ouht:1ndi11~ rcsuurcc: 1r:!1cr~ \\'llich :m.: unique and spcci:il ,.,,-:..iicrs of c.\lTptinn:JI '.-!:.11'.; or n;~tion:tl rccre:..i!ion:d or cco\ogjcal si;;.nif1c,:1nce \'.'t",.!c!i rcqui:-c s11cci:tl pro1cc11011 to mal111.1in c.\i!-itin:; uses.
. .
(di \\-'.1::.:..-()1.1:i/111 Si:,.n,Lird:-.. The 11":11c, cp1:di1~· s1:1nd:1rds .1rplicJblc 10 cctch c!.1ssif1c:it>rn .1·~.si::;1\t.:J
:trl' i.hu:-:,~ ~~,l:1h:i:-.iwd in 15 .'<C,\C ~I~ .0~(,11. Ch~'.'-iJic:ttinns :1110 \\-'Jrcr ()u:tl1i:: Si:ind:.i;-;~~ :\f,;--,\1cib!::
:o ;hc-S,1:-f:1cc \\'J:-. . .-;-~ of \:onh C:1ruli11~1. :i:, :Hlo;):t:d b~· the \onh C.1roli11:i Enl'ir<111111c:·.::d .\!:in:1~<.:-
:n,:11; ('.o::-::ni'.'l,:(nl.
(;,.··1 l:11'.·: · ,,·:J.~;h:..·t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1\'RCD -f:Al'l!IOY\/l;.\", .. <.. ;\f.·1:\'A(;f:\f/ \ !
(I) Reading the Index Number. 11,c ;,._a .. , , idcntir,cation number assigned to c.,, I, · · · tributary progression _between the ni:i::, ·: (2) Cross-Referencing the Index /\'umber. I: -provide an adequate cross reference Ix·:'"· of streams,
({) Classification Date, The classification d.,' visions of Section 14J-215.I of the General S:.,:•.' · to the classi.fication assigned to the \'arious :;::'.:·.1:: (g) Reference. Copies of the schedules of,!.,· various ri\'cr basins may be obtained at no (!·,J:,··
I , , -
Division of F:·.·, ,· ·. · Departmcn: ,·f ·
and Co1r.1:H:· .. · Po51 ()f'.. · Raleigh. '<1,r: • (h) Places where the schedules may be imr,,·, ,,. ·
Oi\·i~1n:i , :
Archives•· \'.,1·~
10' I I
Raic,~• .. (i) \.;nnamed Streams. (I) Any stream ll'hich is not named in :he,.'.-.: fication as that assi!!Tled to the stream ~~ ,'.:: -· (/\)·unnamed stream; srcciJicaUy descr::•:·· (8) unnJmc<l fresh\\'aters tributary 10 11c!.1: · .. , · (C) after \o\'emher I, 1986, any nell'I:.-,., .. _.· Class S,\ waters by arrro,·ed dred~in~ ;·, cl:.Js5i(icJtion proctcdings are con<lucte.:. (2) The folloll'ine ri,·cr b;,sins ha\'e di!Tcrc::: 1 for !ipccilJc ar~as or 1he basin: lliwas,ce River Basin (Rule .0302) Little Tcnncs!iCC RiYer na!iUl and S,1\·;.::,:· .. 1· Drainage Arca (Ruic .030.l) frcnch Droad l(i\'er Basin (Ruic .0.1Qc, Watauga River Uasin (Ruic .0305) Broad l(i1-cr Basin (l(ule .0306) ~·ew !liver Basin (l(u/e .0307) Catawba Ri,·er Basin (Rule .OJOS) Yadkin-l'ee Dee Ril'er Basin (Rule .OJr,';J Lumber (liver Ilasin (Rule .0310) l\oanoke River Ilasin (Ruic .0313) Tar-Pamlico R is·er Ilasin (Rule .OJ I 6) _Pasquorank Ril'cr Ilasin (Ruic .0317)
TIS: 02fl .OJr/0
: appearing in the column so des_ignated is an ·: segment of a stream, indicating the specific .,Jl\ and the tributary stream. .•oon of the index number in the schedule is to · classification schedules and an alphabetic Llst
· ·, the date on which enforcement of the pro-.• 1ri h Carolina became effective with ref crcnce ,:!, Carolina.
·,, adopted and assigned to the waters or the ·:ng 10:
\ t a.nagement
I\ esources
·-~;1,pment
: -,,S7 .
·., 2761 I
: : '•r .1ry
· ll uilding
· :-·,ream classifications carries the same classi-·.I1ich it is tributary excepl: '.cdulc of classifications; or .,·:·> ll'il] be classified "C"; or ::'., of tidal saltwater which arc connected to :'.: be classified "SC" unless case-by-case re-
~ unnamed streams entering other states o_r
!fiJl01y NOie: S1011JI01yAu1/rori1_1· G.S. /4]-214.I; /4]-215./; /4]-2!5.](a)(/); [Jf Febiua,y I, 1976;
,/mended lff ;\'orembcr I, /986; Fcbn,ar_1 /, /986: Janua,y I, 1985; September?, !979.
'; .: \
I
I
I
I
I
1-,·~ -: • f..1•i\l.ROHXE..YTAL K,\HAGD'
. C ,C8 cAnllBA RJYER BASDI
t.:.u-:,· c~ Stream
:..'nna.rred TributarJ at
OC'.hopedic Hospital
Shoal Branch
l"..i 11 Creek
Long Cove
Porter Branch
St1JQl1\al1 Branch
, ~ Crowders Creek I Squirrel Branch
Xct;ill Creek
I Unnamed Tributary at
Camp J a,res ( ~
J...,_. Lalce)
Unnamed Tributary at
Camp James
Abernethy Creek
fi:-st Creek
Bessemer Brancb
Oats ·cree.k
OaJ;J and Lale e I-;,,. Blackvood Creek
f'ergu_soo Branch
McGill flrancb
I
South Fork Crowders Creek
·south Cro~ders Creek
On.named Tributary at
Sparrov Springs Lake
(Sp.uro,.1 Spririgs Lake)
li.1JJarrF:d Tributary at
SparrO',/' Springs Lake
Ro:\~· Bru11ch
,, Torce.,ce bcanch
I
I
I
Su9a: Creci'.
Uillo:u TvirLS La.VJ:;,
a.'1C LaJ.:e Jo
)
Description
Fran source to Cata..rJ.a Creek
Frcxn source to Cata .. -ba Creek
frCID source to Nor.!! Carolina·Soulh
Carolina State Line
Fran source to Lake \J'ylie, Cata..rba
River
fro:n source to Lake \.lylie, Catawba
River
Frcxn source to Lake WyUe, Cata..-ba
River
Class
C
C
C
WS-Ill&ll
C
C
frcra_ source to .Nortb Carolina,-Soulh C Carolina State Line
Frcn source to Crowders Creek C Frm source to Crovders Creek C Frco source to Dam at Camp Jai:Des Lake B
Fra:n Dam at Camp Janes Lake to
CrO\IOers Creek
Frcxn source to Crowders Cie-ek
rra:n source to Abernethy Creek.
F'ra:n source to crovce.rs Cr-eek
· Fran source to Abernethy Creek
Entire lake and connecting st.re.am to Crowder s Creek
Frcm source to Crol.'Ge:s Creek
F'rcrn source to CrQl.'de:s Cre-e.k
Fron source to CrO'wde..rs Creek
Nor:tb Caroli.ca Portion
Frcm source to South .'ark Crowders
Creek
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
frO'l'I source to Dam at Sparrov Springs B Lalce
frcrn ~ at SparrCN Sp:-i.n9s t.a.k.e to South Fork CrO'w"lers C:~
·rrcxn source to J,ort..'1 Carol..i.ro-Soutb
Carolina State Line
· Frc:rn source ~o »ortb Carolin.a-South
.:.arolioa State Linc
frc:rn scurce to North Ca:oUna-South
Carolina State Lule
Frcn s.o,.:rce to .Suga:--:~k
Entire laY.c.s ar.,G coc..:-:.-:ting st. ... --e.am.s to lr~·:..r, Cre-<?.k
Frcr:: :;ou:cc to 1:-.ri!': -::-r_-(!k.
C
C
B
C
C
C
Classification
Date index No.
9/1/74
9/1/74
9il/74
2/1/86
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
3/1/62
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
J/1/62
3/1/62
3/1/62
3/1/62
9/1/74
3/1/77
S/l/71
9/1/7,
9/1/7,
,/l//q
S/l/1·!
11-130-3
11-130-4
11-131
11-132
11-133
11-134
11-135
ll-135-1
11-135-2
11°135-J-(l)
11-135-3-(2)
11-135-4
11-135-4-1
11-135-5
11-135-5-1
11-135-6
11-135-7
11-135-B
ll-135-9
11-135-10
11-135-10-1
ll-135-10-1-1-(l).
ll-135-10-1-1-(2)
11-135,ll
l l -136
11-137
11-D7-l
11-1)7-1-l
11-137-1-2
11-137-2
C
I
' ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I, ,, ,,
I
I
I
I
February 18, 1991
To: Davis Park Road TCE Site File
From: Bruce Nicholson
Subj: Telecon with CHris Goodreau, NC Wildlife Resources Fisheries
Biologist, [phone].
I spoke with Mr. Goodreau concerning the us.e of Blackwood and
Crowders Creek as fisheries. He said he thought he had no data on
these creeks, he would check on that and get back to me if he found
any. Just based .on what he knows about Crowders Creek he would say
that there is virtually no use of Crowders Creek in the Gastonia
area and only very limited use, perhaps a little bridge fishing by
locals, several miles downstream.
bin/tel/davis2
),t-J,-/ .:ft
i
I '
i
~ !<~ ,'.,{
I
I
I i
-'j'I
•~( ji--r-: .. ';
1n·~
•< ..:. I !, ,
~v' -J '·~ ,.,,,.,-1 ' I I
I
i
----------------\---~ 1
~i ••. --v-,*l ,, , "
.-··r T --!-'V -r·-n) .L.,
~L..' .I ;.._,~
-r·-_._"
+ 'I
f ... ~'/. I-;
'
' . '1,.7 ,
rl ,_•I
f.1 ..... r" .. 7""7"~---:;,c
'
........... -;
,,_
. ·1 'i ....,. :
I .. I ' : \." ?J.-.1
r . ,.
-i~y f', -'. -r,,,,,
'"'--··;-
r 7
"!). ,,-~::.
'
I i
0
r·
1
I I-.
-
,.
' -f-
I.,
• ·:· • l -;.L..··---::, ''7",.1-i
('•'11/. •t ~le.' ..,_,_,, .. f1• ''/ V . i .• -. ; ,-I
,1/ ~ ·;... f• ·1·/ "'1/ ?)]f -· '-/) J
,, "1. , .. ,._·.r. c·;t
: /' "7 •, ·: . ,1 , ~-~---I ; ' ~t ti
:":;-f'-'." f T ;i--.,.~
1 ...
j
I ,;J,, , I . •1
I ... , --:,:.:··-~
·1' r-" 1..1
< LI
), .-/ ••'/V
,---;, )/-'·.,,. ··;,·
}Z .,,. ·,;.
' -'
I
I
I
'
-
---
i
I
. I ) ', -Jr, -c
PL,/,, 7
/.
(i. L )'
(_ i:i"
fl -! (/<'•••~1.:.
L."( /' .,,, ..... l
p--,.-1-. ,:... A11 r
i) ,-' ~' ..:-\.: ,., --
11 _,
. ' ;~" ,_1 __
.,,_,~ ,-... , ...... r -t-, .----:~-~
.. /ict,! )1.,.-
' /2 -ifu
jl i . ' ' L.•. ,,.~ --.it : 1:\-T /J: .pv
---
, -----------,
I '·-,. ; C
.--·-,,--'
3,·t'
/I
Jv.-::,
()
;;, h-1\.'
u
/ &
i
I !
' C:-~ ;;_ .;_ L,,.,. 1/' i
.~t: ._ \'II 1-l,. ,./ ' . .
,_,1 r // i .--. w · •• It.
,,._; ! /l...,,_)<-__
. -r ! .. _.,-,
\/t. y
JL 7
;.' µ
[ ,,;)
t ,•) .l-
&,f'>
-I {..
I i · I f. -_;..:/
I,
i
I' -1.
/c-7,
/t :;-
' : I(._" ... •L'! :,
-
I ..
I
I.
; -
'-", I,{-.
rcpye J
'ii, L
, -,, , I • -.c..,
/J'-L
/1. ,; 7
, ,
'
,-.i~ ....
:t·: _,:_ ... ·-:-
·.
- -
r i ~--y-z· t.
· fiv l.: it r
,:_' /S-. 'I s-; \ '(
";i ./{. ·"" , '; "i
Jc Ii. l ,_
(. I 2...
/, --.. /,_ ·1 (12_
i.. /// ;· : ....... '.., :
].:_. 't
2 --.: . I
:2_ 'tC
.'J.,~)
i I ! i '
..... I ------•
i i
.
~--
(" .·•·f .
:;::·/·.
\;(:-
.,. -, ::, .
~1:{;;_·.
It-t::_. Ff,}
_,,:
' i .·,
I . /!, le t . , ·t 1(i1r:J.! Vt\lh I-cf-~, 3~/ ~Cl>
I
/It,__ >~: I v-~~~s i-A.,. /<>S
I
t"1 J\-•t ;Lv.J•
,. /'' ; G,e. f.:;,,. ' . ·, '/ ·' -~"' /! ;•,-~ ~ .\.
½f(,~~
. ;
...{.
...SJt"i ,' !
AR .-i;,_,
.i,,_ R~·0i..,.
;
L
Lf f1 (,,, ~.,."' j
2, r~.,.~.:.,, .. o
I I
,J)(r;,}(..)o,./
.?.. l'f,,,,.) 01"'~
,.t-(--'-" / .... p .. .J; ,(JI(_
Lu,, /l,i
y i" t';,/.,_/ '
7b·f 3 ' .
..
i
i;, .,, :1 11. ., ;:_ , " ~r,h ,..-I' C .-: 1 ,1,r-,/
i
I
-
.
,. ,·,· ._.·
~'-.. -;.:· .
t:
\~_=:·
::::-~;
,.:i;~.
1, .. ' ,".? .:ti .. i:~:~r ~:rr-·,
·./; _:-.... -.. ·· J::r.: ~~It
. :~· .
; ,_..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
May 11, 1994
File
Harry Zinn, Enviror.--
North Carolina DEHN;
Private Well Data
Gastonia/ Gaston
NCD 986 175 644
On October 14, 1993 I ta 1'.• the construction of his well. v diameter and is approximately"
On October 14, 1993 I ta i <· · about the construction of her w• about her well.
On October 14, 1993 I ta:•.• about the construction of her ,.. .. about her well.
On October 14, 1993 I ta>.-the construction of his well. diameter and is appro~imately :-
On October 14, 1993 Ital~-which previously served the Ceda: well is 6 inches in diameter ar.j well supplied has 26 hook-ups.
:·.::.neer
: :end Section
'ark Road TCE Site
: : :l Carolina
-'.L. Godwin, 2231 Davis Park Road about. stated that his well is 6 inches i~
'": .. ?auline Philbeck, 2301 Davis Park Road .... ?hilbeck did not know any information
~,,. Doris Corella, 2403 Davis Park Road v: .-·. Corella did not know any information
Charles May, 2419 Davis Park Road about '-".--1:: stated that his well is 6 inches in ::~ep.
~·: Cregg Bess about the cc~taminated well : ,:.': Subdivision. Mr. Bess stated that the .•::: "Ximately 150 feet deep. The system the
Ref.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
iJNJ.TED STATES E~VJRC•Ht'.J::n,,~ PRC•'.:EC·:roN AGENCY
Re:.1i<1:1 ~:·;
Envir•:>r.merltaJ ST:·v:.,:es [•:~·vision
College StztiC•ll f:,,acl, i,tr,,1~. C.a. 30613
DATE: 03/ l5/ '14
SJEJ2C':: Resul :s
9L-0;:.,4
of ?urgeable (1::gc•.nic. Aiial ys i ~i;
D.WIS PARK F:J; 1'•:E 3 I
G.\STON:A MC
C.\SF, NO: 21:,S 9
F'll)M:~harles H. Ha,iper
Chia!, ~abora:ory A:;s~rance Section
Atta:f .. ed a:e, th,:! r,2sults cf 2.n3J,,s: c,f ~i-3.11tple:; collect"ed as part of the s~.1,jec: JJrc,_jec=.
As a r,~su.:.t of :he Qu-3.lity .'\~Si..lnH1c.•: l!·:!\.:".•=v.·. c1irtair1 data qualifiers
may• :lC.\/e bee,n p Laced ,)n t!-_e dar.c,. .\t 1 3.cl1-:C i~ 3 DATA QUALIFIEF R:~FORT 1Nhi::L e>:plains the r~cs-Jr.s t!1a1 .th,::::.e qusl·~fiers were required.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 2155_9 Project Number 94-0241, SAS Number
Site ID. Davis Park Rd TCE Site, Gastonia, NC
Affected Sample
Volatiles
82565
82566
82566,82567
82567
82568
82571, 82572
82575
Compound or Fraction
Flag
UsedReason
chloroform J
acetone J
1,1,1-trichloroethane J
benzene J
trichloroethene J
1,1,1-trichloroethane J
1,2-dichloroethene,total J
<quantitation limit
erratic response factor
<quantitation limit
<quantitation limit
<quantitation limit
<quantitation limit•
<quantitation li1nit
------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... .. .. ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82569 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RO .TCE SI STATION 10: 001-S□
CASE NO.· 21559
- -- ----- --SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • I • • • SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.·
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.: FC81
BY: H ZINN ST: NC 1105 STOP: 00/00/00
-03/14/94 ... .. .. ..
•• ..
UG/KG ANALY1 ll:AL RESllllS
. ' .... ,. ... , ......... " ... -..................... .
12U CHLOROME THMJE 12U BROMOMETHANE 12U VINYL CHLORIDE 12U CHLOROETHANE 12U METHYLENE CfiLORIDE 12U ACETONE 12U CARBON DISULFIDE
l2U 1. l-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE) l2U l. 1-0!CHLOROETHANE l2U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) l2U CHLOROFORM 12U 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE 12U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
l2U l .l. 1-TR!(HLOROETHANE 12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE l2U BROMODJCHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
llG/KG ANAL YT !CAL RE SUL TS
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U . 12u 12U 12U 12ll 12U 12U 12U
12U 12U 12U 12U
12U 15
1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE CJS-1 .3-DJCHLOROPROPENE TRJCHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE .
TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT· ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •II-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM OUANTJTATJON LIMIT.
•R-OC INOICAT[S THAT DAlA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- -
-- - - --
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
- - ---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. --- -- -
03/14/94
' . . . ' ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. .. ..
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82566 SOURCC DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: 002-SB
CASE NO.· 21559
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.·
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
CITY: GASTONIA
COLLECTION START: 01/25/94.
D. NO.: FC78
BY: H ZINN
ST: NC 1010 STOP: 00/00/00
.. .. ..
• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • :t••
lH.l/l<G ANAL YI I ("Al n S-IIL 1 ~
12V 12U 12u
1 ~u 12U 120J 12U 12U
12ll 3B 12U 12U 12U 8,1
12U 12U
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE C.HLOROE THANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE I. 1-DJCHLOROETHENE(I. 1-DJCHLOROETHVLENE) I. 1-D!CHLOROETHANE 1. 2-DICHLOROETHENE I TOTAL l CHLOROFORM 1 . 2-D I CHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1. I. I-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODJCHLOROMETHANE
llG/KG ANAL VT I CAL RESULTS
l~U 12U 20 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 2ou· 12U 79 12U 20U 12U 210 14
I .2-DICHLOROPROPANE CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHVLENEJ DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE .
1. 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1 .3-DJCHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM. METHYL ISOBUTVL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XVLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE 'EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •II-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- -
---· ---PURCEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... .. .. ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82567 SOURCE· DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: 003-SB
----·-SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. ----
• • • • • • •• • • • . .... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.· FC79
BY: H ZINN ST:· NC 1025 STOP: 00/00/00
--03/14/94
• • • ... .. .. .. .. .. .. CASE ., . . • . NO.: 21559 SAS NO.· ························•·•••"'""· ............................ ,. ............. . ANAL V r I ( Al RfSlll rs UG/KG ANAL YT I CAL RE SUL TS
UG/K(~
l2U 12U
12U 12U 12U 100U 12U 12U 12U 260 12U 12U 12u 7,1
I 2U 12U
CHLOROMETH/1.NE BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1. 1-DICHLOROETHENE( 1. 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1 . 1-D I CHL OROETHANE 1 . 2-D I CHLOROE THE NE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1. 1. 1-TRJ(HLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
12U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 12U CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 17 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRJCHLOROETHYLENE) 12U D!BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 12U 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE 2J BENZENE 12U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U BROMOFORM . 12ll METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 12U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 12U 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 230 TOLUENE 12ll CHLOROBENZENE 45 ETHYL BENZENE 1;-u rlrvP.[Nf.
]JO TOlAL ~VL[Nf~ r·fP· f'J' ,...-,;,~.~t•Pr
•••FOOTNOTES••'" •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NA!-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATER!AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUAf.lHTATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
----SAMP.LE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. -----. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... • ..... ,. ............ ·--• ...................... . PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82568 SOURCE· DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: 004-SO
CASE NO.· 21559
UG/KG ANAL YT JCAl. RESUt TS
12U CHLl!ROMETHANE
12U BROMOMETHANE 12U VINYL CHLORIDE 12U (HLOROETHANE 12U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 12U ACETONE 12U CARBON DISULFIDE
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.
12U I. 1-DICHLOROETHENE(I. 1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U I .1-0ICHLOROETHANE 38 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 12U CHLOROFORM
12U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE 12U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 12U 1.1. 1-TR!rHLOROfTHANE 12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 12U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED Cl TY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.: FC80
BY: H ZINN ST: NC 1045 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE 12U CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 4J TRICHLOROETHENE(TRlCHLOROETHYLENEJ 12U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 12U 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE 12U BENZENE 12U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U BROMOFORM
12ll METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 12U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 12U 1 .1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 46 TOLUENE 12ll CHLOROBENZENE 12U ETHYL BENZENE 12U STYRENE 100 TOTAL XYLENES 18 PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
-03/14/94 . . . ... .. .. .. •• ..
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- -
--- - --- -- ----- ---SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD,_ATHENS, GA. 03/14/94
MlSCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ........... ' ............................ . ... . • • • . . • • . . • .. PROJECT NO . 94-0244
SOURCE· DAVIS PARK RO
STATimJ 10: 002-SB (ASE NO.· 21559 . . . . .. . . . . .
• • • • . • • • • • • SAMPLE NO. 82566 SAMPLE
TC[ SI
SAS NO.·
TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: H ZINN •• CIT\': GASTONIA ST: NC " COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1010 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
0. NO. FC78 MO NO: •• ..
• • • • • • • • • • • * • • • • • .. • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • ••
400JN lOOOJN 600JN SOOJN 800JN 300JN 400,IN
2000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
TRI METHYL HEXANE . DECANE ETHYLMETHYLHEPTANE TRIMETHYLBENZENE
UNDECANE METHYLCMETHYLETHYL)BENZENE FTHYLOIMETHYLBENZENE 3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAT-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN·
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION .
. .
-·-
----- -- - --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. -----
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ... .. • • • PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82567 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: 003-SB CASE .NO.· 21559 SAS NO.·
• • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
. ... . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA .
COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.: fC79
BY: H ZINN ST: NC .1025 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO:
-03/14/94
...
•• .. •• •• .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ...
4000J 600JN 2000JN 700JN 500JN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
5· UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE TRIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS) UNDECANE METHYL<METHYLETHYL)BENZENE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of. MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- -
------------"-SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
---
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ... .. .. ..
, ................. , .. • • • PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82568 SOURCE· DAVIS PARK RD TCE SJ STATION JD: OO0-SB CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.·
........................................ SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLL.ECTED BY: H ZINN CITY: GASTONIA ST: NC COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1045 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: FCBO MD NO:
-
03/14/94
• • • ... .. .. .. ..
"
,. ................................................ ,. .. ,. .. _ ............................. .
•••FOOTNOTES•••
200JN 6OOJN.
20OJN
400JN 6OOJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE TRIMETHYLBENZENE (3 ISOMERS) DIETHYLBENZENE ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS) 3 UNINDENTJFIED COMPOUNDS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
-----
PURGtABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . . . .. .. .. PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82573 SOURCE: DAVI$ PARK RD ICE SJ STATION JD: 001-PW
CASE NO.· 21559
---- ------SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
SAS NO. ·
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.· FC85
BY: H ZINN ST: NC 1445 STOP: 00/00/00
-03/14/94
.. •• .. .. .. ............... ,,, ...... . ........................................................
Ul]/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1 OU CHLOROMETHMJE lOU BROMOMETHANE IOU VINYL CHLORIDE
lOU CHLOROETHAN: 10U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 10U ACETONE 10U CARBON DISULFIDE 10U 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ lOU 1 .1-DlCH!.OROETHANf IOU 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 10U CHLOROFORM 1 OU 1 . 2-D I CHLOROE THANE 10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
lOU 1. 1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10U BROMODJCHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
lOU 1,2-DJCHLOROPROPANE lOU CJS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE lOU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE lOU 1. 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU BENZENE 10U TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE lOU BROMOFORM 1011 METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE 10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE lOU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ lOU 1 .1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 10U TOLUENE 1011 CHl.OROBENlfNE 10U ETHYL BENZENE
1Qtt .-,TYRf"-Jf ,r.. ,.-,, 111 ... •l r~,r ',
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.'
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--
- - -- - -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
--·-I-SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. -----
• • • • • • • • • * • • • • .......................... ., ....................... . .. PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO SOURCE: DAVIS PAR• RO ICE 51 STATION ID: 002-PW
CASE NO.· 21559
82574
··········•~t••t• lll.i/l ANAI.YTJ('AL RESULTS
lOU CHLOROMcTHANE lOU BROMOMETHANE lOU VINYL CHLORIDE 10LJ CHLOROETHANf lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE lOU ACETONE lOU CARBON DISULFIDE
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
SAS NO.:
1 OU 1 . 1 -DI CHLOROE THENE ( 1 . 1-D I CHLOROE THYLENE) lOU l .1-DI'CHlOROfTHANf
lOU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) lOU CHLOROFORM lOU 1 .2-0I CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL •ETONE lOU 1. 1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
••.,REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: FC86
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC 01/25/94 1540 STOP: 00/00/00
~G/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE IOU CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE IOU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE IOU 1, 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 OU BENZENE lOU TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE IOU BROMOFORM 1011 METHYL ISOBUTYL •ETONE lOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE IOU TETRACHLOROETHENf(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ IOU 1 .1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 OU . TOLUENE lOU GHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE IOU STYRENE
IOU TOTAL XYLENES
-03/14/94 . . . . .. .. .. ..
•• ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER· JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
----------- - ---
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT . . . .
. .
• • •
·········•·.•·· . . .
•
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82570 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RO TCE SJ STATION 10. 003-PW
CASE NO.· 21559 • • • • • • • • • . . • • • • . • • • UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
lOU CHLC•ROME THANE lOU BROMOMETHANE lOU VINYL CHLORIDE lOU CHLQ~OETHANE IOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE lOU ACETONE lOU CARBON DISULFIDE
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •.• ...................... . SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA.
SAS .NO. • • • • • • • • ' • • • •
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTED
COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
BY: H ZINN ST: NC .1210 STOP: 00/00/00
0. NO.: FC82 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS ' 10U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE IOU CIS-1 .3-0ICHLOROPROPENE 10 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU OJBROMOCHLOROMETHANE IOU 1. 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE IOU BENZENE IOU TRANS-1 .3-0ICHLOROPROPENE IOU 1.1-0ICHLOROETHENE(l.1-0ICHLOROETHYLENEJ IOU BROMOFORM 10U 1. 1-0JCHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE lOU 1 .2-0ICHLOROETHENE ( TOTAL) IOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE lOU CHLOROFORM 10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) IOU 1 .2-0ICHLOROETHANE lOU 1, I .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE lOU TOLUENE lOU 1. 1. 1-TRJCHLOROETHANE 10U CHLOROBENZENE IOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU ETHYL BENZENE lOU BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE lOU STYRENE IOU TOTAL XYLENES
•••FOOTNOTES•••
03/14/94
• • • •
• • • •
.... .. .. .. ..
•• .. .
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INO!CATES•THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION .
. .
-
----PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
• • • • • • 11 • • • • • • • . . . ...
• • .. .. PROJECl NO 94-0244 "AMPLE NO. 82575 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: 004-PW
CASE NO.· 21559
,_ ----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA_ . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . PROG ELEM: 55f COLLECTED BY: H ZINN CITY: GASTONIA ST: NC COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1600 STOP: 00/00/00
SAS NO. D. NO.: fC87
03/14/94 ... .. .. .. .. ..
UG/L ANALYTJt.:AL RESULf5 ······•, ... , .... , ........................... .
IOV CHLOROMETHANE lOU BROMOMETHANE lOU VINYL CHLORIDE IOU CHLOROETHANE IOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE IOU ACETONE IOU CARBON DISULFIDE lOU I .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ IOU 1. 1-DICHLOROETHANE 2J 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE iTOlALJ IOU .CHLOROFORM
IOU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE lOLI 1. 1. 1-TR!rnLOROFTHANE IOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
-~•FOOTNOTES••·
UG/L ANAL YT I CAL RE$llL TS
IOU 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE IOU CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE
38 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ lOU D!BROMOCHLOROMETHANE IOU 1. 1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE IOU BENZENE
10U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM lOU METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE. 10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE lOU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEI 10U 1 .1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 OU TOLUENE
1011 CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE lOU STYRENE lOU TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
--·----PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
.. . . . . . . ,. . . . . . . . . .. . . .
PROJECT tJO. 94··0244 SAMPLE NO. 82576 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD ICE SI STATION JO: 005-PW
CASE NO.· 21559 , ........ , ...... ,,,,, .
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
lOU CHLOKOMETHANE JOU BROMOME THANE IOU VINYL CHLORIDE 10U LHLOROETHANE
lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE IOU ACETONE IOU CARBON DISULFIDE
---·-SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. -·-
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: •GROUNDWA . PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
CITY: GASTONIA
COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
SAS NO.· 0. NO.· FC88 ... , ........ ..
_, -
BY: H ZINN ST: NC 1650 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
lOU 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE IOU CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE lOU 1. 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU BENZENE
lOU 1.1-DJCHLOROETHENE( 1.1-DJCHLOROETHYLENE) lOU 1 .1-0JrHLOROETHANf
lOU TRANS-1 .3-0ICHLOROPROPENE IOU BROMOFORM lOU METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE IOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE lOU 1 .2-0JCHLOROETHENE (TOTAL I 1 OU CHLOROFORM lOU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE IOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE IOU 1. 1.1-TRJCHLOROETHANE IOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE IOU BROMOD!CHLOROMETHANE
• • • REMARK.S• • •
•••FOOTNOTES•••
IOU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) IOU 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE lOU TOLUENE lOU CHLOROBENZENE lOU ETHYL BENZENE JOU STYRENE IOU TOTAL XYLENES
•••REMARKS•••
-03/14/94
• • • • ... .. •• .. •• ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-!NTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUAN~ITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--
------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
-- -- -
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. -- -- ----
03/14/94 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. •·• ., ....... •.• ...................... . ..
••
..
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82571 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SJ STATION ID: DOG-PW
CASE NO.· 21559
UG/l ANAL YT If.Al RESLIL TS
lOU CHLOROME THMIE lOU BROMOMETHANE lOU VINYL CHLORIDE lOU CHLOROETHANE
lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE lOU ACETONE lOU CARBON DISULFIDE
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
SAS NO.·
lOU 1. 1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE)
lOU l, 1-0ICHLOROfTHANf 10U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) lOU CHLOROFORM lOU 1 .2-0ICHLOROETHANE 10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5,1 1 .1. I-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA BY: H ZINN ST: NC COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1240 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: FC83
UG/L
lOU lOU 51 lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU 18 lOU lOU
1011 lOU
1011
: C ·
ANAL YT I CAL RESULTS
1.2-0ICHLOROPROPANE CJS-1.3-0ICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) OJBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1, 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1.3-0ICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHI.OROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE SlYP[Nf
~.-,r,•q ••lf"Jfr
•••REMARKS•••
.. .. ..
•• ••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NA!-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACIUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANA~YSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
--- -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. ..
PROJECT NO 94--0244 SAMPLE SOURCE: DAV IS PAHK RD H:E SI STATION ID: 101-PW
NO.· 21559
----- --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
NO. 82577 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
SAS NO.· D. NO.: FC89
---
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC
---
01/25/94 0725 STOP: 00/00/00
-03/14/94 . . . . .. .. .. ..
•• CASE ... . • • ., ........ , •• ,.,:11,,, ................................................... .
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U IOU JOU
lOll 10U 10U IOU 10U IOU 10U 10U
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1 . 1-D I CHI.OROETHANE 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE I. 1. I-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
10U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE lOU CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE lOU TRICHLOROETHENE(TR!CHLOROETHYLENE) 10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10U 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U BENZENE 10U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM 10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 10U TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE 10U STYRENE 10U TOTAL XYLENES
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANA~YSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--
GEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE ANO.ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS. GA. 03/14/94 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................... ·• ...................... .
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82578
SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: 104-PW
CASE NO.· 21559
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA
SAS NO.·
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
0. NO.: FC90
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC 01/25/94 1700 STOP: 00/00/00
.. .. .. ..
•• ...................... ,. ........................... .
IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 10U
10ll
lOU 11
IOU 10U IOU IOU IOU
CHLOROME THft.M!: BROMOMETHANE VINYL CH LOP. !OE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACE TONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1. 1-0JCHLOROETHENE( I. 1-DJCHLOROETHYLENE)
1 . 1-0 I CHLOROE 1 HANE 1.2-DJCHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE
I. I. !-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U 10U 10U lOU IOU IOU !OU 10U
10ll 10U 10U IOU 1DU. 10U 10U IOU IOU
1.2-0JCHLOROPROPANE CJS-1 .3-0ICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLORDETHYLENEJ DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANt 1. 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1 .3-DJCHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ
1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
•
·ooTNOTES• •• A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. R-OC INDICATES lHAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION .
- -- -- ------. . . - ---·--
•
-
RGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE IJO. 82565 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RO ICE SI
STATIOI.J IO: 105-PW
CASE NO.· 21559
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD, ATHENS. GA. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .•··. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
SAS NO.
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.: FC77
BY: H ZINN ST: NC 0730 STOP: 00/00/00
03/14/94
• • • ••• .. •• •• •• •• 9 1 I t t. • • t f 9 9 I t T t 'l f t t • ' . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• IJG/l.
10U CHLOROMETHANE IOU BROMOMETHANE IOU VINYL CHLORIDE IOU CHLOROETHANE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE IOU ACETONE
IOU CARBON DISULFIDE 1 OU 1 . 1-0 I CHLOROE THE NEC 1 . 1-0 I CHLOROETHYLENEJ IOU 1. 1-DICHLOROETHANE IOU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 3J CHLOROFORM IOU 1 .2-0ICHLOROETHANE IOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE IOU 1. 1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
IOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE IOU BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
REMARKS•••
FOOTNOTES•••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10U CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE IOU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE. IOU 1.1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE IOU BENZENE
IOU TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE lOU BROMOFORM
IOU METHYL I SOBUTYL KETONE IOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE IOU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ IOU 1. 1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE IOU TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE IOU ETHYL BENZENE IOU STYRENE 10U TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NA!-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR RUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND M_AY OR MAY NOT OE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- - - --·---- -- -- - -
• '
'I
-1111111
RGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPnRT
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82572 ,OURCE: DAVIS PAR, RD TCE SI STATION ID. 106-PW
CASE NO 21559
LIG/L ANALYTJc~AL RE5ULT5
10U CHLOROMETHANE IOU BROMOMETHANE IOU VINYL CHLORIDE IOU CHLOROETHANE
10U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 10U ACETONE
10U CARBON DISULFIDE
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: CROUNDWA
SAS NO.·
• • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . ·-. . " . . PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN
D. NO.: FC84
ST: NC 01 /25/94 .1250 STOP: 00/00/00
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
,au 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10U CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 50 TR I CHLOROE TH ENE (TRI CHLOROE THYLEIJE) 10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10U 1 .1 .2-TR!CHLOROETHANE !OU BENZENE
10U 1 .1-DICHLDROETHENE(1,l-DICHLDROETHYLENE) IOU 1. l~DICHLOROETHANE
IOU TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM
10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) IOU CHLOROFORM 10U 1. 2-DICHLOROETHANE 10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 5J 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE IOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
FOOTNOTES•••
17 TETRACHLOROETHENEITETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1 OU 1 . 1 . 2. 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 10U TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE 10U · STYRENE . !OU TOTAL XYLENES
•••REMARKS•••
03/14/94
• • • ... .. .. .. .. ..
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- - ----- --_,_ -- - ---