NCD986175644_19940524_Davis Park Road TCE Site_FRBCERCLAPA SI_Expanded Site Inspection-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
State of North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
AVA
DEHNR
May 24, 1994
Mr. Craig Benedikt
NC CERCLA Project Officer
EPA Region IV Waste Division
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
RE: Expanded Site Inspection (ESI)
Davis Park Road TCE Site, NCD 986 175 644
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Benedikt:
Enclosed herewith is the Expanded Site Inspection report for Davis Park Road TCE site
(NCD 986 175 644).
If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone].
Enclosure
HZ/sr
cc: Dexter Matthews
file
Sincerely,
~~~-
Harry Zinn
Environmental Engineer
Federal Contracts Branch
NC Superfund Section
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
m
I
D
:g
g
I
I
I
I
I
EXP ANDED SITE INSPECTION
Davis Road Park TCE
NCD 986 175 644
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
May 1994
Superfund Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
Prepared by:
~ ~ ,,
Harr~
Environmental Engineer
Reviewed by:
rover Nicholson 1
ederal Contracts ranch Head
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
SITE DESCRIPTION and WASTE CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . 1
WASTE/SOURCE SAMPLING ........................... 4
GROUND WATER PATHWAY ........................... 9
SURFACE WATER PATHWAY ......................... 14
SOIL EXPOSURE and AIR PATHWAYS .................... 14
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
APPENDIX
REFERENCES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1.
TABLE 3-1.
TABLE 3-2.
TABLE 4-1.
TABLE 4-2.
LIST OF TABLES
PREVIOUS SAMPLING RESULTS ............... 5
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS ................... 7
SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS ........... 7
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE
LOCATIONS ............................ 12
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL
RESULTS IN UG/KG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
FIGURE 1
FIGURE2
FIGURE 3
LIST OF FIGURES
TOPOGRAPIDC MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
SITE LOCATION MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS .................. 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
D
D
0
0
D
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Under the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), and a cooperative agreement with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Waste Management Division, Region IV,
the North Carolina Superfund Section conducted an Expanded Site Inspection (ESI) at
the Davis Park Road site in Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina. The purpose
of the ESI was to obtain the data necessary to assess the threat posed to human health
and the environment and to complete a Hazard Ranking System (HRS) score for the
site to determine the need for further action under CERCLA or other authority. This
investigation included viewing existing files and sample data, conducting groundwater
and soil sampling under EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) protocol (January
25, 1994), and collecting additional non-sampling data needed to test previous PA/SI
hypotheses and to document HRS factors.
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 Location
The Davis Park Road TCE Site (DPR) is located between Hudson Boulevard
and Dogwood Avenue west of the city of Gastonia within the Gastonia Extra
Territorial Jurisdiction {ETJ) area. The site consists of an area of contaminated soil
behind the Moore's Transmission and Auto Repair Shop (Moore's) and a plume of
contaminated groundwater that begins at the Moore's property at 2307 Davis Park
Road and extends south along the west side of Davis Park Road to Dogwood A venue.
The site also includes the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision located on the east side of
Davis Park Drive within the confines of Cedar Oak Circle. The site can be found on
the Gastonia South, North Carolina USGS 7.5' Quadrangle Map at latitude 350 13'
56" N and 810 13' 08" W (Figure 1, Ref. 3).
2.2 Site Description
2.3
The site, situated on approximately 20 acres, includes private businesses and
residential homes. The topography of the Moore's property is slightly sloped to the
west towards Crowder Creek (Figure 2). The source of the plume of contaminated
groundwater is an area of contaminated soil located behin_d Moore's in the vicinity of
a drain line exiting the service bay in the facility.
Operational History
Prior to 1960, the site was owned by Mr. John Birch of Gastonia, who
operated a service station on-site. Mr. Carl Bell, 2916 Burnt Mill Road, Charlotte,
purchased the property in about 1960 and operated a service station on-site until about
1979 or 1980, when he leased the property to Mr. Roy Moore, who currently
operates a transmission rebuild and repair facility on-site (Ref. 4, 5, 6).
1
I
D
D
D
n
n
1U
1D
ID
1D
1• ..
" I
1·1
·1
I
I
See Figure I HRS Documentation Package
" >
' i 'o,
;~ I
I''<
' )
SJ
~' I :1.
12' ]()"
O-~ mile 1
I I
I
B"-Hed eWobd.CJrCie C0-11 tf!J
, NM M~re}Co'mmun,t Well co1z:' f )l
NA, Puntan Commun, We/I CQ-4 JI II
,1 l I 111 -, ., 1[
mile /l.-Jenkins,Cbmrrunt w ·11 co J l
3 -Gedar Oak Park SID j If, 1
6-P.enn Pilrk Dr SID it
9,-Sk land or· SID ,111
1;2 --1VallE! dale SID
fl I a i ' r
26 -Old Providence SID
28 · Silverstone S/0,i <
11 , ~
15-Kin Gf<)ntS/D f
21 • Mountaih Villa e MHP
23 -Brimer Rental Pro ert
25 -Oakle Park #2 j
33 • ~aur81 Woods SID·
il I" I
11-!AlanAcres
2'.l B8verl ' 'A6res
111-Sunset P,ark SID_;
13:. Lamar Acres
14[-F~rk !?lac·~ ,
16f-Ma leicrest SID ,
1 d-H1ckoi V.1llage MHP
H11-Bren ooij MHP
24} NbrthWoO:ds MHP,
271, Rab ·s MHP
' 29,1' South'Lalie SID
1 30-Suburban MHP
l 321; Woodl nd Ac•es ,
! 34~ Windvi;oocl Acres SID l 35:.(Raintree SID
139 H FallscrhtJI SID
140 0-Squth Foriist SID
41 l/Am Acres
42 !ICastje,yoocl SID
45 .!.:Shad est MHP
47 ':Cha ellAdes,MHP
48 ;,S arrow MHP1 ·
so;pMRe'nt,.ls•
51 -,)iicko 1Cre€1i S/D
52 'Robmwood Lake
--·h,,(
I
I
53-'Cha el Grove Elem Sch ol
11 H ·r
Et ~l!akewoo"cl SID
7 -Pines Mf'I P 1
8 -Rob1 iibrof)k Pla,;e
) 0 -Sub"urb.in He1 his S/0
18 -Uack-A!-Shell MHP
22-Fairfax SID'
31 -.Wesle Acfes#2
36 -Southam ton S/D
37 -South Hills Estate 111
38-Woddlei h SID
43 -ston'e G>aks SID
44-Battian IMHP
46 -snowshoe MHP
49-Covin tdn MHP
'q10 00 FEET
i' I {N .C )
I -""'
"107'30"
~102•30•, n ·1·1 •61 ii· i
.,f Mapped, edited, a'n? pu11\~hed byltheGrolog1cal Survey,
'<l<i,f c t 'l b ' I dt · I I I I a ' t, 1~ on '", Y USGS, USC&Gs,1 nd S6'ut h Ca rolina Geodetic Su r,1,y I "',,, l I Ill l ! I I I ij 0 ~~ 1 Topography by photogra rn 'l'"t ru;-methods from ·a erir l p~ otdl ra phsl ~~ taken 1971 Freldche;c.ke~ t~'7.l ! 11 I I I , I
e , I 11111-, -l , r0Ject1on: North Carnlir1i c ~r~,n~te system ( am ber. ce Mormal eon oc)
10,000-loot gnd ticks b\ sci! 1j Nori~ d ,o I Ina ~oolc '"[1 le ~yst,,,n a nd
0 , Lr ' ' t. I" ,I f '\ I ' I vou,,, varo 1na coord ,nate (Yfl~f• ncrch zone I , '
1000-meler Unive rsal rh,ri s\e~Se'Me,btp1 r grid t rc<s . I
l ' '" '" ' ' I I ' ' zone 17,shown rn blu_c 1921 Nori hlAmenca n datu m I -l l I I I I I I I Red lrnt 1nd,cates area ,n wh1c nit.I ndrnark b'uild ngs are shown', I I ! i I '
' i
.I 111 il
""\fl',I i ·,11 I
Ni
I ,
J
' ,
I
'
I
f
' ' ,rr ,1
I 'i
'"'
'
<
1" I -
1
.," rl
1 I I " I! 11
I: -I 'I
j Ii ' i I
I"' I
·)~~~~U R INT':l 'AL '20 FEET
O,IUf/ IS MEA N SFA I E>C:L
' I
IZ, d-1/hl
~'I Fffl
t, :: II ! TH ,\ MAP COMPLI ES Wll 11 NATION I MA~ ACC VRAGY STA~'CARDS
!• I FOR SJ\~E BY iu: S GE•)LOGICAL S , RVEY WASHINGTON D. C. 20242
I' '11 A1FOLOER DEscR1 □11'1G l oP.OGfl'.PHIC MAPS ND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE oN REQUEST I II I I f 1 . ', i I I i, ! ij i I
--------------+ ~77
i\(8
~
WUAllH~NC11-1:cn'>J
BESSEMER CITY
1920000 FEET IS CI 1i7
-, ,, ' f<UAD CLASSIFICAT'ON
P-1mary high.vay,
l1ard surfcce
Sdcondary h1ghvi~y
bard ~ur fH , e
lnterstdc R:ule
I I l 1 L1r;htnu~y road hard 'u\
1m~rov~,i sur(ac~-!.l
Uni rrpra •,ed road:_ i=~fl
0: 11 I,
Sio lei~o· S Route
l 'l' KTNOS MOUNTAIN, N .Cil .~'
N"/4 KINOS MOUN J OaN l Y :J.lJA!JRAN6~
N3507 b-W811517.5 . 1
1971
AMS 473~ JJJ Nlc:-SB:l>IFS
';I
.,,.'
DNITED ST ATES
:iARTMENT OF. THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGJCAL ;',URVEY
''I ',I
IIT'1 GRID ANO 0973 MAGNETIC NQRT.-<
C[GLINATION sT ~CNTER OF Sfl[Ef
, STATE I , OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENTi:QIF r ~ -' ~
RVATION .A:ND DEVELOPMENT
ORTH CAROLJNA
E4, ,,v/
COMCUR INTERVAL 10 l"EFT
'1All(JNA_ Gc:lJETIC VERTICOI DAIUM OF 1929
THIS MAP COMPLI ESWI TH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANllAROS
FOR SALE BY U S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DENVER, COLORA)O 80225, OR RESTON, VIRGINIA l2092
A FOLDER DESCRIBING TOPOGRIPHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON
7CO] rel
KILOMCISF.
REQUEST
,_
;~:¥-_!V,.
/' i ' -
... ~/
QLIAD,'-J!OLC LC,,IT C,rJ
•
,-'
l
GASTONIA NORTH QUADRANGLE
NORTH CAROLlNA -GASTON CO.
7.5 .MINUTE SERlES '('FOPOGRAPHIC)
' SW/+ GS0TONIA I~ OUA~P/,'l',Ll:
GASTONIA NORTH, N. C.
01'!/4 GA'HCWIA IS 0 UADRAt1GLE
N3515-W8 JC7 5/7 5
1970
~MS 4':54 l 3W SC,PIES V842
;;::.-'i.e. .
'1 ',,,
/-" -',\\, .. -
, ,. rn '\ ,I;:' r;·1'.::· , _
-~ • · -"-'.._~~~~ '(:,,i_>r'k;:':~'~-X\ -,-~~ '~''"1l:J --' -.,, /, ,_ .I . ,; 'tic a.a-' i •'• ~----,n~, ·-Z;J.<· -""•a/--=-·,,,1·n· ,/"-✓i '1,t,.' --,_ ·~ , ____ ,-Y i.__ ---••llf'_ .,
~ /,=_-,..,;:'G)i"~"'"-·' '. J --
,L._ / ,-
: l ' ,
< --,. "'(,
I '~~!,_;· I '-\" ~0~~--
-'/)" "'' (;},,,'.-.........~'
r /Xf~;f 1,1.,. : _)
',' / ,' ,::'.,,,.,,,'
/ . ,, . /,-.,,:';; t< '
,{ 1-)"' \''''"
/ "\ ,,
~'b"'., I
') ' ' , -'I l I \' •(' I , • , }/ \ \_ I ', ,
I;,,, .. '---J'·'
/_ I ' ," t j '' ,H ,;/ ,,-:,Si>. ' ' ' ,p ' •.
Primary h1glr way
hard s1urfoce
I
L1ght-d1 •tv road. ha rd ~r
1r11praved su rl3ce
Se,:on(ary h1ghwoy,
l"ard s~rfoce Un1mprrw~c roJd
', ]· l,1tersta e Route , U S Rcute Starn Rni Fe
-', :: /
' ' ) ' [.
' ' ' -:k
)'.f, r· ' :' ,k
'
GASTONJA SOUTH, N, C-S-C,
N'/J J4 CLOVF!t JB' QlJ ADRAl'GLE
N3507 5-W8107 5/7 5
1973
AMS 47'4 11 N\1-"-Sl!RJES V84~
'22'30'
"00
550 C~l'• > le.ET
(N CI
"SS
i
r,
1 r
I
i
l
I '
I
I
11
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
==-~
I
I
I
I
See Figure 2 HRS Documentation Package
T
I
' J
t .
i
' k-~,...:--. --T - .
--· ' ,,.--•_,___ . .
I . -
I
. I '
'
I
l
)
'
f
' ,
I
!
l )
)
I I _;
}
I
I I
l ' ' ,
I
./
f
[
t
I .
f
I
t
i
I
I •
i ' I f 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.4 Waste Characteristics
In March of 1990 during routine sampling of the community well at the Cedar
Oak Park Subdivision, and again in April 1990, high levels of trichloroethylene
(TCE)and tetrachloroethylene (PCE)were detected in the groundwater. During
follow-up sampling by the Gaston County Health Department (GCH), three other
private residential wells were also found to be contaminated (Ref. 7).
The North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) performed
extensive sampling of the private wells in the vicinity of the site from May 1990 to
August 1992 (Table 2-1). Several samples were collected from soils behind the
Moore's operation close to a drain line which exits the rear of the building (Ref.8).
These soils were highly contaminated with PCE and TCE (Table 3-2). The drain line
• was installed when Acme Petroleum installed service bays in the shop portion of the
service station. A holding tank was to be installed, but, when bedrock was
encountered at 2-3 feet, the tank was not installed (Ref. 9).
During an off-site reconnaissance on September 14, 1993, no other likely
sources of PCE and TCE were located in the vicinity of the site (Ref. 10). Based on
this information, the North Carolina Superfund Section believes discharges from the
drain line have contaminated the soils and subsequent! y the groundwater behind the
Moore's operation. The area of soils ·contamination has not been fully delineated;
however, sampling has shown that the area is greater than 1 square foot (Ref. 11) and
the area of stained soils appears to be approximately 5 square feet.
3.0 WASTE/SOURCE SAMPLING
3.1 Sample Locations
Based on the existing documentation of the drain line being the possible source
as listed in Section 2.4, source sampling conducted during the ESI was limited to
confirming the contaminated soils around the drain line. The soil sample locations
are listed on Table 3-1 and are shown on Figure 3-1 . Since PCE, TCE and their
degradation products were the only contaminants present in previous samples, only
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) analysis were performed on the samples. A
duplicate soil sample was to have been collected from the third soil sample area,
however, when bedrock was encountered at 24" depth not enough soil was in the
sampling auger bucket to fill a duplicate.
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
Sample Location
Billy Frank (CO-71
2301 Davis Park Road
Debbie Parker (C0-8)
2503 Davis Park Road
Glenda Rowland (C0-11 I
2347 Hedgewood Circle
W.L. Godwin (C0-12)
2231 Davis Park Road
Resampled (C0-23)
Shirley Fortner (C0-1 3)
2717 Davis Park Road
John Crenshaw (C0-14)
281 6 Davis Park Road
Tarte (C0-15)
2501 Briaroak
Howe (C0-16)
2603 Davis Park Road
WGAS Radio (C0-17)
627 Davis Park Road
Crumley (C0-18)
2 7 23 Davis Park Road
Coe (C0-19)
2212 Davis Park Road
Moore CW (C0-22)
see map
Doris Corella
2403 Davis Park Road
James May
2400 Skyland Drive
Monte ,
Agency
DEM
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
DEM
DEM
GCEH
GCEH
Date Sample Type
.
5/7 /90 Drinking Water
5/15/90
7 /1 2/90
-
5/15/90 Drinking Water
-
6/1 /90 Drinking Water
6/1 /90 Drinking Water
7 /1 2/90 Drinking Water
6/1 /90 Drinking Water
6/1 /90 Dr_inking Water
-
6/1 /90 Drinking Water
-
6/11 /90 Drinking Water
•-
6/11 /90 Drinking Water
..
... 6/11 /90 Drinking Water
-
6/11 /90 Drinking Water
-
7 /12/90 Drinking Water
-
-5/20/90 Drinking Water
1 /30/91
7 /23/92
5/7 /90 Drinking Water
8/23/90 Drinking Water (Filtered)
8/23/90 Drinking Water (Unfiltered)
TABLE 2-1 (con'tl
PCE TCE Chloroform cis-1,2 1, 1-Dichloro 1,2,4-Tri 1,3,5-Tri Others
Dichloroethene ethane methylbenzene methy!benzene
0.25
trace 44.5 trace 2.8
trace 37.1 2.6
1K
yes
.
yes
-
1K trace ·-
Clean
trace 1 .2 trace trace
-yes
...
1 K 1K yes
Clean
trace -
trace 1K
trace 57.55 trace 2.2 trace yes
-
trace 24.3 1K 1 ,6 yes
trace 28 trace 2.1 yes
17 0.33 2.2
0.35 yes
·•
8.1 yes
trace 441. 1 1K 1 . 5 yes
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
)
Sample Location
.
Cedar Oak Subdivision
J
r ;
__ /
Charles May (C0-1 I
241 9 Davis Park Road
Roy Moore (Moore Transmission)
2307 Davis Park Road
Charles May (CO-1)
24 1 9 Davis Park Road
.
Skyland Drive CW (C0-2)
see map
Jenkins CW (C0-3)
see map
Blake/Puritan CW (C0-4)
see map
Cunningham/Penny Park CW (C0-5)
see map
Russell Graves (C0-6)
2425 Davis Park Road
Agency
Aquatech
Aquatech
GCEH
EPA ESD
GCEH
EPA ESD
GCEH
GCEH
EPA ESD
GCEH
EPA ESD .
GCEH
GCEH .
DEM -
DEM -
DEM .
DEM
DEM
DEM
DEM
DEM
DEM
DEM
GCEH
GCEH
EPA ESD .
GCEH •.
EPA ESD
GCEH
GCEH
GCEH
.
GCEH
..
GCEH
GCEH
-
DEM
GCEH
GCEH -·
TABLE2-1
Date Sample Type PCE
3/31 /90 Drinking Water 23.7
4/17 /90 23.7
? 5/1 /90
7 /1 6/90 12
8/23/90 20.9
1 0/9/90 14
4/27 /90 Drinking Water lK
? 5/1 5/90
7 /6/90
8/23/90 trace
1 0/9/90
1 /30/91 1K
5/20/91 lK
5/7 /90 Soil behind garage Late Eluting
5/7 /90 Soil 1 8" deep at dump spot
7/1 2/90 Soil 32" deep at oil in ditch
7 /1 2/90 Soil 12" deep at oil in ditch
8/8/91 Soil 30" deep oily area behind shop
8/8/91 Water in hole
8/12/92 Soil beneath drain pipe a7
8/12/92 Soil 1' out and 1 6" deep at pipe
8/13/92 Water thru drain pipe
8/1 3/92 Monitor Well #1
4/27/90 Drinking Water 1K
? 5/15/90
7 /6/90
8/23/90 trace
10/9/90
1/30/91 i K
5/20/91 1 K
4/27 /90 Drinking Water trace
4/27 /90 Drinking Water CLl:AN
4/27 /90 Drinking Water CLEAN
4/27 /90 Drinking Water tr;:ice
--
5/7 /90 Drinking Water 0.31
5/15/90 tr lee
7 /1 2/90
TCE Chloroform cis-1 ,2 1, 1-Dichloro 1 ,2,4-Tri 1 ,3,5-Tri Others
Dichloroethene ethane methylbenzene methylbenzene
34.9 9.2
34.9 9.2
51.8
31
56.1 trace yes
41
101 .4 1 K 3.8 trace yes
134.3
82 3.8J
11 6.3 trace 4 yes
68AJ 3.4AJ
84.2 1K 3.5 yes
66.2 lK 2.8 trace yes
Chemicals (LEC) = 1 .3 EE06
Clean
LEC =44000 yes
LEC = 14000 .
370 2700 2400 580 yes
30 2000 1 6 yes
720 1500 730 910 yes
630 I 1300 520 yes
26 ' yes
0.75 lK
101 .4 1K 3.8 trace yes
134.3
82 3.8J
116.3 trace 4 yes
68AJ 3.4AJ
· 84.2 1 K 3.5 yes
66.2 1 K 2.8 trace yes
trace -
.
I
trace trace I .. . , ...
I " '
• ! -· --... . .
' -... . .
8.4 0.18 ' . . , ..i. ~
6.8 . ' -.. • ..
7 .. .. --.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.2 Analytical Results
Samples used to delineate the source area of contamination were analyzed by a
laboratory participating in the US EPA CLP as specified in the CLP Statement of
Work. Data was validated by the US EPA Region IV, Environmental Service
Division, and the validated data along with the Data Qualifier Report were provided
to the North Carolina Superfund Section. A complete copy is provided in the
APPENDIX to this report.
No VOC's were detected in the background sample. TCE and/or 1,2-
dichloroethene (TOT AL), a biodegradation product of TCE, were detected in all of
the soil samples. Toluene and total xylenes were also detected in the soil samples,
however these are not above any health based benchmarks and are not contaminants
of concern (Table 3-2, Ref.2).
6
-------------------TABLE 3-1
Sample Number Type
DR-001-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
DR-002-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
DR-003-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
DR-004-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
I
1,2-Dichloroethene (TOTAL)
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
Total Xylenes
ND -Non-Detect
BQL -Below Quantitation Limit
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCD 986 175 644
Soil Sample Locations
Rational
Background Sample
Source sample #1
Source sample #2
Source sample #3
TABLE 3-2
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCD 986 175 644
Soil Sample Analytical Results
ug/kg
I DR-001-SB I DR-002-SB
ND 38
ND 20
ND 79
ND. ND
ND 210
7
Description
Background sample located on-
site.
I' south of drain pipe
2' west of drain pipe
9" west of pipe
I DR-003-SB I DR-004-SB I
260 38
17 4-BQL
230 46
45 ND
330 100
1;
I
1! ' ' Ii
I
I
Ii
I
I
I.
l
I
I
1:
11
A-
l i B-
C-
D-
I ~= 3-
i 4-
l i 5-
6-
0 0 0000 0 0
·O ◊ooo □□□
HUOSuN l,UID.
0
-----'
/ -'· l"lce:Rt .J
I
I B e, A
I
\
\
'-
------
AVG RiC.HL/\1\10
0 O □ D D 0
0 DO O □
GL,;N ~/IVE1v AVG
□oo □□oo
DODOO □
DR-001-SB
DR~002-SB
DR-003-SB
DR-004-SB
DR-001-PW
DR-002-PW
DR-003-PW
DR-004-PW
DR-005-PW
DR-006-PW
Source
Source
Source
BackS;fround Soil
Godwin Well
Bill Philbeck
Doris Corella
Charles May
Russell Graves
Cedar Oaks Subdivision
\'" OA-K C.\ fl(..J .. \;. Ceo• "□ □ C O C o □ ~
0
□
' \
'\ \
c('., .. >,
I
I
/
l!Fig. -~~~""';"_;""·=·,·;it-le: -CL;·;a~li~~--P~i~ts f;~-Davis Park Road TCE site
: ~~;~h--~ar~l-ina -
I Division of Solid --------------i------·-·-----·--·•· -------, ·-----·-··---
~•!waste Management Scale:Not to Scale :Date: April 1994 ,Drawn By: H. Zinn
JSuperf=d Section!Srte Na= Davis Parli Road = NCO 986 175 644
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.3
4.0
4.1
4.2
Source Conclusions
Sampling has confirmed that an area of soil in the vicinity of the drain line is
contaminated with TCE and degradation products; 1,2-Dichloroethene and 1, 1, 1-
Trichloroethene. The area encompassed by the samples is approximately 0.75 sq. ft.,
however the total area of contamination is suspected of being larger based on the
observed stained soils.
GROUNDWATER PATHWAY
Hydrogeology
The DPR site is located within the Piedmont Physiographic Province and is
characterized as foliated to massive granitic rock unit of the King Mountain Belt. The
formation is described as a coarse grained, porphyritic, well-foliated biotite granite.
Others have described this formation to have several intrusive phases that exhibit
cross-cutting relationships and differ in texture and degree of foliation. The rocks are
megacrystic to equigranular granite to quartz monzonite (Ref. 13).
Most of the domestic water supplies, industrial supplies, and several municipal
supplies in Gaston County are obtained from wells. Dug wells, usually found in
older, rural areas, derive their water from the saprolite which is the weathered and
disintegrated zone between the soil and the unweathered bedrock. Drilled wells, used
for higher yields for industry and municipal use, obtain their water from either granite
or schist formations (Ref. 14).
According to Mr. Mark Durway, the former hydrogeologist for the Gaston
County Health Department, the saprolite and the fractured bedrock act as a single
hydrologic unit (Ref. IS).
Groundwater Targets
The closest domestic well is located at the Doris Corella residence, 2403 Davis
Park Road, about 150 feet south of the site. The closest community well is the Cedar
Oak Park Subdivision well located less that 1/4 mile from the site (Figure 1). At the
time of the ESI sampling event, the NC DEM was overseeing the installation of a
deep monitoring well on-site. No sample results arc available at this time.
Determining the population using groundwater as their potable water supply
required several steps. First, the areas served by the Gastonia Water System were
delineated on the topographic maps covering the Target Distance Limits (TDL). The
urban areas, denoted as pink on the topographic maps, located outside of the Gastonia
Water System were planimetered and this area was multiplied by the population
density figure for South Gastonia (315.3 people/sq. mi.). Community wells were
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
located and houses served by them were delineated. Finally, those houses not
covered by any of the previous delineations were counted as being served by private
wells, and that number was multiplied by the house density for Gaston County (2.64
people/ household)(Ref. 16, 17).
Population Relying on Groundwater For Potable Water
Radius Population
0 -¼ 162
¼-½ 441
½ -1 229
1 -2 2132
2 -3 5808
3 -4 3357
4.3 Previous Investigations
The groundwater pathway for the DPR site has been extensively investigated
from the time of the discovery of the contaminated well at Cedar Oak Park
Subdivision up to the present as can be seen on Table I. Gaston County Health, NC
DEM, EPA ESD, and NC Superfund have all been involved in determining the extent
of contamination that has occurred at the site. The detection of PCE, TCE and their
degradation products has been consistent in those wells that are contaminated.
4.4 Sample Locations
The purpose of the ESI groundwater sampling was to establish private and
community well contamination using CLP protocol. To do this we collected a
background sample and samples from the five closest private and community wells
which have shown to be contaminated during past investigations. To conserve
CERCLA resources other nearby private and community wells which have been
shown by past investigations to have levels of contamination below health-based
benchmarks were not sampled. No on-site monitoring wells were present at the time
of the ESI sampling event.
10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.5 Analytical Results
Samples used to document a observed release of contaminants to groundwater
and to determine actual contamination of drinking water wells were analyzed by a
laboratory participating in the EPA CLP as specified in the CLP Statement of work.
Data was validated by the US EPA Region IV, Environmental Service Division, and
the validated data along with the Data Qualifier Report were provided to the North
Carolina Superfund Section. A complete copy is provided in the APPENDIX to this
report.
Only VOC's were tested for during the ESI since PCE, TCE, and their
degradation products are the only suspected contaminants at the site. Table 4-2
summarizes the results of the VOC analysis performed on the groundwater samples.
Samples DR-003-PW, DR-004-PW, DR-005-PW, and DR0006-PW all show
contamination with PCE and/or TCE at levels above health-based benchmarks
published in the Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (March 1993).
11
-------------------TABLE 4-1
Sample Number
DR-001-PW
DR-002-PW
DR-003-PW
DR-004-PW
DR-005-PW
DR-006-PW
DR-101-PW
DR-104-PW
DR-105-PW
DR-106-PW
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCO 986 175 644
Groundwater Sample Locations
Type Rational
Groundwater grab Background Sample
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
.
Trip Blank QA/QC
Preservative Blank QA/QC
Rinsate Blank QA/QC
Duplicate QA/QC
12
Description
Godwin Well
2231 Davis Park Road
Philbeck Well
2301 Davis Park Road
Corella Well
2403 Davis Park Road
May Well
2419 Davis Park Road
Tompkins Well
2425 Davis Park Road
Cedar Oak Park Sub.
Cedar Oak Circle
Trip Blank
Preservative Blank
Rinsate Blank
Duplicate
-------------------
PCE TCE
DR-001-PW ND ND
DR-002-PW ND ND
DR-003-PW ND 10
DR-004-PW ND 38
DR-005-PW ND 11
DR-006-PW 18 51
DR-101-PW ND ND
DR-104-PW ND ND
DR-105-PW ND ND
DR-106-PW 17 50
ND -Non-Detect
BQL -Below Quantitation Limit
TABLE 4-2
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCD 986 175 644
Groundwater Sample Analytical Results
ug/kg
CHLO RO FOR 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
M (TOTAL)
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND 2-BQL
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
11 ND
3-BQL ND
ND ND
13
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHENE
ND
ND
ND
.
ND
ND
5-BQL
ND
ND
ND
5-BQL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.6
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.3
6.0
6.1
Conclusions
The DPR site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The
saprolite/fractured bedrock make up a single hydrologic unit. Previous sampling has
shown contamination attributable to the site.
Samples collected during this ESI using CLP protocol havedocumented a
release of contaminants from the site to the groundwater and contamination of potable
wells exceeding health-based benchmarks.
SURFACE WATER PATHWAY
Hydrology
Surface water drainage from the site is through swales, ditches and an
intermittent stream for over 1/2 mile before it enters Crowder Creek, the Probable
Point of Entry (PPE)(Figure 1). The 15 mile surface water pathway ends in Crowder
Creek before it enters Lake Wylie.
Targets
Crowder Creek is not classified as potable but is a fishery (Ref. 8, 9). No
surface water intakes are located within the 15 mile surface water pathway.
Conclusion
Since the contaminants are VOC's with relatively high health-based
benchmarks and previous investigations have shown that the site does not pose a
significant threat to human health and the environment, the surface water pathway is
not a pathway of concern.
SOIL EXPOSURE and AIR PATHWAYS
Conclusions
Contaminated soil is located behind the Moore's facility in the vicinity of the
drain pipe coming out of the building. This soil is contaminated with PCE, TCE and
their degradation products; 1-2 ,Dichloroethene and 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethene, along with
toluene, ethyl benzene and xylenes. The extent of soil contamination has not been
determined, however, the stained soils are confined to an area of about 5 square feet.
The contaminated soils are limited to the site.
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7.0
The levels of all of the contaminants found in the soils are well below any
health-based benchmarks, and no schools, day care facilities, or residences are located
on and within 200 feet of the contaminated soil. Based on these facts and since
previous investigations have shown that the site does not pose a significant threat to
human health and the environment, the soil exposure pathway is not a pathway of
concern.
No release to the air pathway is suspected. No evidence of off-gassing was
present during the ESI sampling event. Based on these observations and since
previous investigations have shown that the site does not pose a significant threat to
human health and the environment, the air pathway is not a pathway of concern.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
At some time during the operation of the site as a service station or
transmission and auto repair facility, PCE and/or TCE was released from the site
through a drain line installed in the service bay area of the building. These
contaminants found on-site in the soil around ihe drain pipe exiting the Moore's
facility, have migrated into the groundwater. PCE, TCE and their degradation
products have been found in several private wells and a community well at levels
above the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL's) set by the US EPA. An observed
release of hazardous contaminants to the groundwater and the actual contamination of
private wells and a community well above health-based benchmarks has been
documented using US EPA CLP protocol.
Previous investigations have shown that the site is not a significant threat to
human health or the environment through the surface water, soil exposure, or air
pathways.
The NC Superfund Section is recommending that the Davis Park Road TCE
site proceed on with the preparation of an HRS package for the possible inclusion of
this site on the National Priorities List.
15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF REFERENCES FOR THE DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
EPA ID NUMBER -NCD 986 175 644
l. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990. Hazard Ranking System; Final Rule.
55 FR 51532, December 14, 1990.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1991. Superfund Chemical Matrix (SCDM).
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Directive 9345.1-13. Revised semi-
annually.
3. Latitude and Longitude Coordinates Worksheets from Guidance for Performing
Preliminary Assessments Under CERCLA U.S.EPA Publication 9345.0-0lA
September 1991 Appendix E
4. Wallingford, Ed. 1990 memo to file Re: Site visit notes. July 1 l.
5. Nicholson, Bruce. 1991 memo to file Re: Telecon with Roy Moore, Operator of
Moore's Transmission and Auto Repair. February 18.
6. Wallingford, Ed. 1990 memo to file Re: Telecon with Carl Bell, Owner of Moore's
Transmission shop Property. August 6.
7. DeRosa, Patricia. 1990 memo to file Re: TCE Well Contamination. June 19.
8. Huff, Chris. Greenhome & O'Mara 1992 memo to Chris DeRoller, NCDHNR,
Mooresville Office Re: Additional Information Regarding Moore's Transmission
Shop. February 6.
9. Zinn, Harry. 1993 memo to file Re: Drainage Pipe Identification. April 26.
10. . Zinn, Harry. 1993 memo to file Re: Field Notes from Off-site Recon on September
14, 1993. September 17.
11. Zinn, Harry. 1994 memo to file Re: Field Notes from Sampling Trip on January 25,
1994. January 27.
12. Syracuse Research Corporation for U.S. Department of Health & Human Services,
Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (ATSDR), "Toxicological Profile
for Tetrachloroethylene" January 1990 ATSDR/TP-88/22 and "Toxicological Profile
for Trichloroethylene" October 1989 ATSDR/TP-88/24.
13. North Carolina Geological Survey "Preliminary Explanatory Text for the 1985
Geologic Map of North Carolina" November 4, 1988.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
14. LeGrand, H.E. and Mundorff, M.J., USGS "Geology and Ground Water in the
Charlotte Area, North Carolina" Bulletin Number 63, February 1952.
15. Zinn, Harry. 1993 memo to file Re: Hydrology of Gastonia Area. December 23.
16. Zinn, Harry. 1994 memo to file Re: Groundwater Population for DPR TCE site.
May 10.
17. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic and Statistics Administration, Bureau of
the Census, "Census 90".
18. Stanley, Jeanette. 1994 memo to file Re: Update on Status of Well Head Protection
Programs in N.C. January 10.
19. NC Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, DEM
"Classifications and Water Quality Standards Assigned to the Waters of the Catawba
River Basin" 15 NCAC 2B .0308 June 30, 1989.
20. Nicholson, Bruce. 1991 memo to file Re: Telecon with Chris Goodreau, NC Wildlife
Resources Fisheries Biologist. February 18.
21. Zinn, Harry. Field Log for Sampling Trip on January 25, 1994.
22. Zinn, Harry. 1994 memo to file Re: Private Well Data for DPR TCE site. May 11.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---
---=--------= ·5 = ::. =....--=
':i.:.,-_ ---== -=-~ -
Friday
December 14, 1990
Part II
Environmental
Protection Agency
40 CFR Part 300
Hazard Ranking System; Final Rule
Handout #8
SUPERFUND CHEMICAL DATA MATRIX
March 1993
SITE NA..½E: D1w<s
AK.:.. :
. ADDRESS: ;)..?>01
. -·. ' .. : ' ·-·-· :·-·---··
LATITUDE-A.ND_·: LOtJGITUOE .CA.LC'JLATIOl; ·'...,'OR:'\.SP.f:ET.12
LI USir,'G EliCINEE?.'S SCA.LS {l/60)
°PAl:K RoAO TCE. .s1TE: CERCLIS I: }.!CD
ssro:
D.-,v, > p le iZ,, ,>,O
'lo' 6 175
-----··-·-. ··--·-·
{, '-/ '(
STATE:_-'-'N~l=-----ZIP CODE : ___ 2___c7_0~,;;:.....::2_=----
uses QUAD HAP NAHE: GAtp,J1A s • .,;. " TOh'NSHIP: \l / S RANGE: S/'n'
scAL1:.(I24,o~:) HAP DATE: SECTION: 1/4 l /:, ---1 / ,.,
P.AP DATUH: @D 1983 (CIRCLE ONE) HER.ID IAN:
COORDINATES FROK LOYlER RIGHT (SOUT!--!EAST) CORNER OF 7.5' P..AP (attach photocO?Y):
LONGITUDE: iU_o _6l_' }_Q__" LATITUDE: ]S-0 Ol ' ><)"
COORDINATES FROH LOWER RIGHT (SOUTHEAST) CORNER OF 2.5' GRID CELL:
LONGITUDE: j'_l__o 11.. ' :le)
CALCULATIONS: LATITUDE ( 7. 5' QUADRANGLE 1-'J,?).
A) NUHBER OF ?.ULER GRADUATIONS ,ROH LATITUDE GR.ID LINE TO SITE ?.E? POINT: ~j_ €i
E) HULTIPL:' (A) BY 0.330,1, TO CONVERT TO SECOtrns:
A X 0.3304 '?;/,, . J.:, "
C) EXPRESS IN HINUTES AND SECONDS ( l '= 60"): '_1,_f_-~"'
D) ADD TO STARTING LATITUDE: ,, o---'..:b_'__}_Q_._Q_ + __ '-2:..£._.2:_~ =
CALCULATIONS: LONGITUDE ( 7. 5' QUi>.DR.AllGLE HAP)
A) NU,-!BER O? RULER GRADUATIOtlS ,RO,-! RIGHT LONGITUDE LINE TO SITE RE, POINT: ll_j_
B) HULTI?LY (A) BY 0.3304 TO COHVERT TO SE:CONDS:
AX 0.2301. J.5__ , _lL"
C) EX?R.ESS !ti ;.!It/UTES AliD SECONDS (l'= GO"'): _Q_' ':'.:,9 ._}J_"
D I l-.D D TO s T AP.T rn G LONG l Tu DE : ~ 0 -2..!=..._ , ___}Q_ . 0 + _o_ , ..l.3_ . __l_l_
LOtiG ITUDS: ~-o ---1_.l _()_ii_._§__ ...
DA:':S:
, _ _.:c-::,:--, ,
I
' I
1
I
I
I
TOPOGi'-APHIC .\'~,? QUADRANGLE N.-\1,iE: 0ASTO N 1P. So vT ~I ---'='-'--=-'-"--"-"-'----=-=:__::__c_o_:_ ___ ~---SC.-\L~:
COORDINATE..$ OF LO\\/ER PJGHT-HAND COR.'\'EP. OF 2.5-' ;1NUTE GRID:
L-'\TITUDE: )2_0 01 · 30 -LOl✓GiTUDJ:: R' __QJ_· ?.0'
I.
' ' ' ' I
' ' ' I
' .. ,
' I
I
I
I I I
To: File
From: Ed Wallingford, NC Superfund Section
Re: Davis Park Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC
On 11 July 1990, Mark Durway and I visited Moore's
Transmission shop located at 2307 Davis Park Road in Gastonia,
NC. The shop was investigated as a possible source of
contamination of two drinking water wells in the Davis Park
Road area. We were accompanied by Chuck Cannon, a Sanitarian
with the Gaston County. Health Dept. We met with Roy Moore,
owner of the shop, who provided the following information:
the site is owned by Carl Bell of Gastonia (704/864-6681)
Mr. Bell has leased the property since 1979 or 1980, to Mr.
Moore who runs a transmission rebuild and repair business
waste transmission fluid and oil are
55-gallon metal drums and stored on asphalt
of the property
containerized in
in the front part
-the waste transmission fluid and oil are burned for heat in
the winter
the transmission casings are cleaned with a caustic
solution; the transmission parts are cleaned in kerosene
-the property was previously used as an automobile service
station; petroleum storage tanks remain in ground and are owned
by Shell Oil/Acme Petroleum Co.
the property receives water and sewer service from the
Gastonia Water and Sewer System
Mr. Moore allowed photographs t6 be taken and indicated
the he would be receptive to other questions, however, he said
that Mr. Bell should be contacted to information concerning the
history of the property.
Wk#& l!laiw:.:.;;.;;;.;.;
I
I
1 To: Davis Park Road TCE
From: Bruce Nicholson
February 18, 1991
Site File
I Subj: Telecon with Roy Moore, Operator of Transmissions and Aotu Repair, 2 3 07 Gastonia, NC 28052, [phone].
Moore's Automatic
Davis Park Road,
I
I
I
I spoke with Mr. Roy information about the site:
Moore, who provided the following
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
He is the operator of the site and Mr. Carl Bell is the site owner. Mr. Bell can be reached through his son Douglas Bell in Charlotte. He did not know Douglas Bell's phone number [Afterwards, I called information and found that Douglas Bell's phone number is unlisted. DEM lists his address as 2916 Burnt Mill Road, Charlotte, NC 28210-6100].
Mr. Moore has operated his shop on site since about 198 0. Prior to that it was a service station of some kind, but he did not have any operational details.
Mr. Moore knows Don Rigger who visited the site to sample a waste oil tank. However, Don could not find the tank where Mr. Moore said it was located. When they talked to Carl Bell he siad that he had pulled that tank years ago.
However, Mr. Bell currently has contractors on site who are pulling two other tanks. One tank reportedly has 5 to 7 inches of product and the other has 3 to 4 inches. The product has a paint thinner-like odor. [I called Chris DeRoller at DEM-Mooresville to notify her of this. DEM has issued Mr. Bell an NOV, but Mr. Bell had not told them he w~s excavating any tanks. She said she would try to visit the site and take some samples tomorrow.]
Mr. Moore also told me about a possible suspected source. He said that for as long as he could remember there had been a tanker truck that was parked in a Church Parking Lot about a l/4~mile south of his shop on Davis Park Road. The truck was from an unknown chemical company in Charlotte. He also said that the parking lot shows damage he says is from the chemicals from the truck. He said that the truck is no longer there and that it disappeared when the news came out about the ground water contamination. [I asked Chris DeRoller about this and she said that Mr. Moore had told her this and that other sources confirm it. She said she thought that Don Rigger may have taken a sample in the parking lot. DEM has looked at the parking lot, and the pavement did look cracked, but it could have been from the weight of the truck rather than a chemical I spill. J
:i.n/tel/clav :i.sl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
ti
I
II
I
II
(I
11
JI
6 August 1990
To: File
From: Ed Wallingford, NC Superfund Section
Re: Telecon with Carl Bell, owner of Moore's Transmission shop
property
Mr. Bell provided the following information concerning the
history of the Moore's Transmission shop property:
-He bought the buildings and property approximately 30 years
ago from Mr. John Birch of Gastonia, NC.
-He operated a service station until about ten years ago, but
the station was only used for pumping gasoline. The property
was also used as a service station under Mr. Birch's ownership.
-The USTs at the site were used for petroleum storage and were
given to Mr. Bell by Acme Petroleum of Gastonia.
Water and Sewer service
establishment approximately 15
lines were
Y.ears · ago.
connected to the
-Water was previously obtained from a well located on property
to the south of the transmission shop. The well is located on
the south side of the adjacent residence.
-There has never been a septic tank on the property; Mr. Bell
is not sure if there is a drainfield.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
19 June 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FILE:
File
Pat DeRosa, Head .lo)
CERCLA Branch
RE: TCE Well Contamination
Cedar Oak Park Subdivision
Gastonia, Gaston County, NC
r contacted the following individuals today regarding the subject site:
1.
2.
Barbara Christian, DEM, Mooresville, (704)-663-1699
She said that Ms. Chris DeRoller, DEM -Mooresville, Groundwater Section had sampled soil at the transmission shop. Surface soil taken from a stainecl area showed 1,300 ppm of a "late eluting" chemical. The sample collected at 18" showed no VOCs or BNA's. DEM is planning to do more work at the site to identify the source of groundwater contamination. Chris DeRoller is the primary con tact.
Boyce Hunt, Gaston County Health Department, (704)-853-5200 ·
He said that to date the primary community well at Cedar Oak Park Subdivision has been sampled twice (March, April 1990) and has shown TCE contamination both times. The secondary well at the subdivision was sampled once and has not shown contamination. ]11is well is currently being used by the 33 connections at the subdivision. Mr. Hunt is concerned that this low-yield well (-J3 gpm) will be insufficient to supply residents throughout the summer. Water conservation has been recommended to residents. In addition, -12 private wells have been sampled one time each. Three show TCE >5 ppb (EPA MCL), others show trace or no contaminants. Residents with levels 2. 5 ppb TCE have been advised not to drink the water and t0 avoid prolonged showering (Ken Rudo has done assessment.) Residents arc buying boltled water for drinking and cooking.
1111
Ill
1111
Ill
1111
li_l
Ill
Ill
1111
1111
Ill
Ill
ilJ
lliJ
IIJ '·
IIJ
l1J
i
ilJ
TCE Well Contamination
19 June 1990
Page 2
Currently, the nearest water line ends -400 -500 feet north of the entrance to the
subdivision along Davis Park Road. Hook up to county water would require
extension of this line. In addition, Mr. Hunt explained that the feeder lines to each
home would need to be replaced to meet county water specifications.
Don Rigger, EPA, ERT [phone] has indicated that EPA may be able to act
under immediate removal authority to provide either bottled water or p9ssibly a
water line extension. However, in order to trigger a removal action, TCE
contamination must.be either 1)..?. 128 ppb EPA action level, or 2) be increasing so
that it appears that the 128 ppb action level may be reached in the near future. This
requires repeated sampling over time.
Currently, the Gaston County Health Department is planning to sample additional
private wells in the area. I recommended that they resample the subdivision well
which has shown contamination and the private well which has shown levels of 101
ppb in an attempt to document any increase in levels. This additional sampling may
provide EPA with the information needed to engage the ERT.
3. Don Rigger, ERT EPA [phone]
Don Rigger was out of the office. I left a message.
PD /jo / memos.pd
ii
i
I
ii
' * i
I
I
I
i
I
I
ti
I
I
,i ,,
II
~-----------------------Grccn/1or11e & Q'_ftfara, Inc.
RECORD OF PHONE CONVERSATION
DATE: February 6, 1992
INCOMING/OUTGOING (circle one)
TIME: 3:15 pm
PHONE NUMBER: [phone]
G&O REP: Christopher Huff, Environmental Engineer
TALKED WITH: Ms. Chris DeRoller, NCDHNR, Mooresville Office
G&O JOB REFERENCE: Site Investigation, Davis Park Road TCE Site,
Gastonia, North Carolina NCD 986 175 644
SUBJECT: Additional Information Regarding Moore's Transmission Shop
Asked Chris DeRoller if the USTs were removed from Moore's
Transmission Shop. She stated that they we're and that there was
no contamination from the USTs. She also stated that DEM took a
soil sample from behind the shop where a drain pipe was found. The
results of the soil sample reviled TCE concentration of 700 ppb and
DEC of 2,000 ppb. Possible source of the ground water
contamination. Chris also stated that when Shell Oil built the
station they tries to install a holding tank for the drain line
but when they started to dig they hit bedrock at depth of 2 feet,
so they left the pipe open to drain onto the ground. The question
of which direction the TCE plume was traveling. Chris answered
that there are actually two plumes, a TCE and a gasoline. The TCE
plume is traveling southeast and the gasoline is heading southwest.
Also, the gasoline plume is from another site near by, She Also
thinks that there are two sources of TCE because as samples were
collected and analyzed the concentration of seem to drop off by
Skyland Drive and pick up towards the Cedar Oak Park well. She
will send a map showing the locations of all samples taken and
sample type.
G&O Representative Signature and Date:
Hel. B
MEMO
DATE: April 26, 1993
1'0:
FROM:
RE:
File
Harry Zlnn, Environmental Engineer
North Carolina DE!lNR, Superfund Section
Drainage Pipe Identification for Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Caroli.na
NCD 986 17 5 644
011 April 26, 1993 I talked to Ms. Chris DeRoller of the NC DEHNR Division of Environmental Management, concerning the drainage pipe located at the Moore Transmission Shop. Ms. DeRoller stated that the pipe was installed when Acme Petroleum installed service bays in the shop portion of the service station. According to her conversation with Mr. Bryson Welch, the con tractor respons.ible for the pipe installation, the original plan was to install a tank at the end of the pipeline, however,. when the area was excavated bedrock was encountered at 2-3 feet below surface level. No tank was ever inst_alled.
I
I MEMO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE:
TO:
FRCM:
September 17, 1993
File
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer
North Carolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
RE: Field notes from Recon Trip on September 14,1993
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
NCD 986 175 644
On September 14, 1993, Grover Nicholson, Doug Rumford and I
went to Gastonia, Gaston County, NC to investigate the possible
locations of potential sources of Trichloroethylene in the southern
portion of Gaston County. We first stopped by the Gaston County
Courthouse and picked up several 1"=200' scaled maps of the area.
After obtaining these maps we met Craig Benedikt, EPA Region IV
CERCI.A Project Officer for this area. We proceeded to perform a
windshield survey of the areas around the Davis Park Road TCE site,
the Harwell Road TCE site, and the Forbes Road Well site. No
probably sources of TCE were located around the Davis Park Road TCE
site other than the suspected Moore's Transmission Shop.
We later reviewed the files of the County Fire Marshall and
Emergency Management Coordinator for any records of previous spills
of TCE in the southern Gaston County area. Again, nothing new was
found for the Davis Park Road area.
Ref. fQ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMO
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
January 27, 1994
·File
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer
North Carolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
Field notes from Sampling Trip on January 25, 1994
Davis Park Road TCE site
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
NCD 986 175 644
On January 25, 1994 Bob Gandley, NC Superfund Section, and I
went to the Davis Park Road site to sample soils on-site and the
surrounding private wells to determine if contamination had
occurred and to what extent it may have migrated off-site. We
arrived at the site at 9:30. Mr. Roy Moore, owner of Moore's
Automatic Transmission and Auto Repair Shop (Moore's) met with us
and discussed our sampling plan. We proceeded to an area behind
the shop an prepared to collect the first source sample. We used
the Hnu 970165 with probe R721, calibrated at a span of 6.66. The
calibration reading was 50 ppm.
We proceeded to sample in a depression area where we suspected
the drain pipe terminated. After hand augering to approximately
2 1 -011 with no indication of any contamination, we asked Mr. Moore
to verify the location of the end of the drain pipe. Mr. Moore
showed us an approximately 211 diameter pipe coming through the wall
of the shop at ground level, and projecting 3" from the wall. We
relocated an collected sample DR-002-SB from l' south of the pipe.
The soil was oil stained to 1811 deep. We collected the soil sample
from 18" to 24" deep. The sample was collected at 10:10 and no
reading was detected on the Hnu.
Sample DR-003-SB was collected 2 1 west of the pipe. Red sandy
clay was encountered to a depth of 2011 • The sample was collected
from 2011 to 26 11 depth, and again was oil stained. The sample was
collected at 10:25 and no reading was detected on the Hnu.
After trying to sample 18" northwest of the pipe and
encountering rock at about 1 11 depth, Sample DR-004-SB was collected
from 9 11 west of the pipe. Clean looking soil was removed to a
depth of 18". Oil stained soil was removed to a depth of 24" where
rock was again encountered. The sample was collected from the 18"
to 2411 depth, however not enough soil was available to collect a
duplicate sample. The sample was collected at 10:45 and no reading
was detected on the Hnu.
We obtained the background soil sample, DR-001-SB, from the
southeast corner of the property, approximately 811 southwest of the
water meter, at a depth of 6 11 • The sample was collected at 11:05
and no reading was detected on the HNu.
Hcf. Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The residence of Mrs. Doris Corella is located at 2403 Davis
Park Road. Nobody was home at the time, however, Mrs. Corella had
given us prior approval to sample her well. Upon initial
inspection no well could be located. We suspected that the
wellhead may be buried, since the water supply lines located in the
crawlspace under the house just appeared and could not be traced to
any area. We proceeded to purge the well at a tap on the southeast
corner of the house. We checked the Ph, temperature, and specific
conductivity at 5 minute intervals to determine if the groundwater
has stabilized. During the purging, we investigated an old wooden
shed located approximately 135 feet south of the house, and next to
an abandoned house. The well supplying the Corella residence is
housed in this shed. A tap was located after a holding tank but
before a filter system on the line feeding the house. The
parameters were checked on water obtained at the tap and were found
to have stabilized after 25 minutes of purging. A sample was
collected at 12:10.
The Cedar Oak Subdivision community well was located on the
south side of the subdivision. The pump was connected to an open
two inch line with a tap prior to the end. A four inch diameter
piece of flexible pvc piping was placed over the open end of the
pipe to carry the purge water outside the wellhouse. Mr. Doc
Thompson, Gaston County Health Department, had told us earlier in
the day that the secondary well supplying the subdivision with
water had been pumped dry the day before. When the pump was turned
on a significant flow of water, approximately 25 to 30 gallons of
water per minute was being discharged. Because of the fear of
pumping the well dry, we sampled the well after ten minutes of
purging, since the parameters had stabilized at this time. The
sample was collected at 12: 4 O and a duplicate was collected at
12:50.
Mr. Godwin, 2231 Davis Park Road, directed us to a tap on the
northeast corner of his house. This tap is the closest to the
wellhead that does not go through the filtering system which treats
the water used in the house. The well was purged for 15 minutes
until the parameters stabilized. The sample was collected at
14:45.
Nobody was home at the Philbeck residence, 2301 Davis Park
Road, however, Mrs. Philbeck had previously given us permission to
sample the well. A tap was located at the wellhead. The well was
purged for 10 minutes until the parameters stabilized. The sample
was collected at 15:40.
Mr. Charles May, 2419 Davis Park Road, was summoned to his
fence due to the presence of a somewhat friendly Malamute. Mr. May
introduced us to his dog and proceeded to show us to the wellhead.
A new galvanized tap had been placed between the wellhead and the
waterline running underground to the house that morning. We purged
the well for 15 minutes until the parameters stabilized. The
sample was collected at 16:00.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Orlin Tompkins, 2425 Davis Park Road, was home the second
time we attempted to sample his well. We had a lengthy discussion
concerning the contamination of the groundwater, the responsibility
of the former owner to inform Mr. Tompkins about the contamination,
and several other matters. Mr. Tompkins then proceeded to show us
an accumulation of what appeared to be blue green algae growing in
the tank on his toilet. Mr. Tompkins requested that we take a
sample of his water inside the house at his sink tap as well as a
sample outside at the wellhead. I informed Mr. Tompkins that we
are limited to the number of samples authorized on the approved
sampling plan, however, I would recommend to the NC DEM and the
Gaston County Health Department that this sampling could be done by
them. We proceeded to the wellhead in the back yard. The
parameters stabilized after 15 minutes, and we collected the sample
at 16:50.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l :I
I
:1
l
I
I ii
TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
Date Published -January 1990 ·
Prepared by:
ATSDR/TP-88/22
Syracuse Research Corporation
under Contract No. 68-CS-0004
for
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Public Health Service
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
in collaboration with
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Technical ·editing/document preparation by:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
under
DOE Interagency Agreement No. 1857-B026-Al
Environmental Fate 71
the vapor phase in the ambient atmosphere and not partition to
atmospheric particulates. Significant evaporation from dry surfaces can
also be predicted from the high vapor pressure.
Experimentally measured bioconcentration factors (BCF) for
tetrachloroethylene in fish have been found to range from 39 to 49
(Barrows et al. 1980, Neely et al. 1974, Veith et al. 1980, Kenaga
1980). Two Japanese studies have also found tetrachloroethylene to have
low bioaccumulation potential (Sasaki 1978, Kawasaki 1980). Monitoring
tetrachloroethylene concentrations in seawater and associated aquatic
organisms is in agreement with the experimental BCF data (Pearson and
McConnell 1975, Dickson and Riley 1976).
6.3.2 Transformation and Degradation
The dominant transformation process for tetrachloroethylene in the
atmosphere is expected to be the result of reaction with photochemically
produced hydroxyl radicals (Singh et al. 1982). Using the recommended
rate constant for this reaction (1.67 x 10-1 3 cm3/(molecule-s) and a
typical atmospheric hydroxyl radical concentration of 5 x 105
molecules/cm3 (Atkinson 1985), the half-life is -96 days. The
degradation products of this reaction include phosgene and
chloroacetylchlorides (Singh et al. 1975). Reaction of
tetrachloroethylene with ozone in the atmosphere is too slow to be
environmentally important (Atkinson and Carter 1984). The predicted
degradation half-lives of tetrachloroethylene in the atmosphere indicate
that long-range global transport is likely (Class and Ballschmiter
1986). Indeed, monitoring data have demonstrated that
tetrachloroethylene is present in the atmosphere worldwide and at
locations far removed from anthropogenic emission sources (see Sect. 7,
Potential for Human Exposure).
In natural water .and soil systems, biodegradation and hydrolysis
may be the most important tetrachloroethylene transformation processes,
although neither process appears to occur rapidly in the environment.
Various biodegradation screening tests and laboratory studies have found
tetrachloroethylene to be resistant or only biodegraded slowly (Bouwer
et al. 1981, Bouwer and McCarty 1982, Mudder and Musterman 1982, Sasaki
1978, Wakeham et al. 1983, Wilson et al. 1983a). Other screening studies
have noted more rapid biodegradation; however, appropriate inocula and
microbial adaptations are necessary (Tabak et al. 1981; Parsons et al.
1984, 1985). The hydrolysis half-life of tetrachloroethylene in water at
room temperature is -9 months (Dilling et al. 1975).
Since neither biodegradation nor hydrolysis occurs at a rapid rate,
most tetrachloroethylene present in surface waters can be expected to
volatilize into the atmosphere. Volatilization will not, however, be a
viable process for much of the tetrachloroethylene transported into
groundwaters by leaching. There is evidence that slow biodegradation of
tetrachloroethylene occurs under anaerobic conditions with acclimated
microorganisms (Bouwer and McCarty 1984, Wilson et al. 1983b),
suggesting that a slow degradation process (of biodegradation and
hydrolysis) may occur in subsurface environmental regions. In regions
where volatilization is not viable, tetrachloroethylene may be
relatively persistent.
p
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
Date Published -October I 989
Prepared by:
Syracuse Research Corporation
under Contract No. 68-CS-0004
for
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
U.S. Public Health Service
in collaboration with
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Technical editing/document preparation by:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
under
DOE Interagency Agreement No. I 857-B026-A I
ATSDR/TP-88/24
Environmental Fat:e 91
6.3.2 Transformation and Degradation
The atmosphere is the primary recipient of environmental releases of trichloroethylene. The dominant transformation process for trichloroethylene in the atmosphere is reaction with sunlight-produced hydroxyl radicals (Singh et al. 1982). Using the recommended rate constant for this reaction at 25°C (2.36 x 1012 cm3/molecule-s) and a typical atmospheric hydroxyl radical concentration (5 x 105
molecules/cm3) (Atkinson 1985), the half-life can be estimated to be 6.8 days. The degradation products of this reaction include phosgene, dichloroacetyl chloride, and formyl chloride (Atkinson 1985, HSDB 1987). Reaction of trichloroethylene with ozone in the atmosphere is too slow to be environmentally significant (Atkinson and Carter 1984). Direct photolysis of trichloroethylene is also not significant (Callahan et al. 1979, Mabey et al. 1981). Although relatively low concentrations of trichloroethylene have been detected in remote global regions (Sect. 7, Potential for Human Exposure), the relatively short half-life of trichloroethylene in air should not permit long-range global transport of significant levels of trichloroethylene (Class and Ballschmiter 1986) .
In natural water and soil systems, biodegradation may be the most important trichloroethylene transformation process, although it does not appear to occur rapidly on an environmental level. Various aerobic (Jensen and Rosenberg 1975, Rott et al. 1982, Wakeham et al. 1983) and anaerobic (Wilson et al. 1983a,b, 1986; Rott et al. 1982) biodegradation screening studies found trichloroethylene to be resistant or only slowly biodegraded. Other aerobic (Tabak et al. 1981, Wilson and Wilson 1985) and anaerobic (Parsons et al. 1984, 1985) screening studies noted more rapid.biodegradation; however, appropriate inocula and adaptation were required. The biodegradation products from trichloroethylene are dichloroethylene and vinyl chloride (Smith and Dragun 1984). Hydrolysis, oxidation, and direct photolysis are not environmentally important processes for trichloroethylene in water (Callahan et al. 1979, Mabey et al. 1981).
Because neither biodegradation nor other fate processes occur at a rapid rate, most trichloroethylene present in surface waters can be expected to volatilize into the atmosphere. Volatilization will not, however, be a viable process for much of the trichloroethylene
transported into groundwater by leaching. There is evidence that slow biodegradation of trichloroethylene occurs under anaerobic conditions (Barrio-Lage et al. 1987, Hallen et al. 1986, Wilson et al. 1986, Fogel et al. 1986, Vogel and McCarty 1985), suggesting that a slow
biodegradation process may occur in subsurface environmental regions. In regions where volatilization is not viable, trichloroethylene may be relatively persistent.
I
I
I
1.11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I
I
I
PRELIMINARY EXPLANATORY TEXT FOR THE
1985 GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTH CAROLINA
Contractual Report 88-1
by
The North Carolina Geological Survey
November 4,1988
I
I I
I
I
I
PIEDMONT
Overview
The Piedmont is an incl.ined plain characterized · by gently rolling
I topography. The effects of l.ithology and rock · structure on topography are
mostly subtle. Noticeable effects include ridges underlain by hard rock such
as Abner Mountain in Montgomery County and distinctive stream patterns such
as that in western Stanly County.. The rocks of the Piedmont are, for the I roost part, metamorphosed and deeply weathered. Outcrops are most co=on
in stream bottoms and on the steeper slopes and, conversely, deep weathering
is most common on the uplands. In many locales, the thickness of weathered
I material can vary greatly over a few tens of feet. Some rock types, such as
argillite in the Carol.ina Slate belt are not deeply weathered which results in
shallow soil and saprol.ite, but . no one has systematicly stuclied the I relationship between rock types and thickness of weathered material.
King (1955) subclivided the Piedmont into belts on the basis of l.ithologies
I and structure. Subsequent authors found it useful to continue· King's
scheme, adopting adclitional belts into general use. On the legend of the 1985
Geologic Map of North Carolina, belts of the Piedmont are grouped as follows:
Kings Mountain belt; Inner Piedmont belt, Chauga belt, Smith River
I allochthon, and Sauratown Mountains anticl.inorium; Charlotte and Milton belts;
Carol.ina Slate belt; Raleigh belt; and Eastern Slate belt. Some pervasive
ro·etamorphic, tectonic, or plutonic events were imposed across several belts.
I For example, groups of intrusions of similar age and tectonic history may
have inclividual boclies scattered throughout the belts and a particular belt
may contain igneous intrusive boclies .from several age groups .(see Fullagar,
11971). -
The Kings Mountain Belt
I The Kings Mountain belt was defined by King ( 1955). This belt has
been much studied because of its variety of rock types and its mineral
wealth. Important early work includes Keith and Sterrett (1931) and Kesler
I ( 1944). Kesler ( 1955) wrote a brief summary of the Kings Mountain belt.
Overstreet and Bell (1965) described the rocks of the Kings Mountain belt in
South Carol.ina in detail. More recently, Horton, Butler, and Milton (1981)
I edited a guidebook for the Carolina Geological Society that represented the
most complete coverage of the belt up to that time.
I The Kings Mountain belt is a sequence of metasedimentary and
metavolcanic rock of generally lower metamorphic grade than the bordering
Inner Piedmont and Charlotte Belt. In contrast to the Inner Piedmont belt
and the Charlotte belt, the stratigraphy is relatively well known. This is I because of the nature of the rocks and the intense study they have received.
Zbt BATTLEGROUND FORMATION
I The following description was condensed from Horton (1983). The unit
is divided into lower part and upper part. The lower part is meta volcanic,
I mostly dacitic to andesitic rocks (hornblende gneiss, feldspathic biotite,
gneiss, and phyllitic to schistose volcaniclastic rocks) inter layered with and
grading laterally and upward to quartz-sericite schist. The upper part
I C0nsists of quartz-sericite schist, kyanite and sillimanite quartzite,
a_uartz-pebble metaconglomerate (at least three beds of metaconglornerate are
I :j 1
I.
,, 1~
;,!,~-;. l't•"·'I ,. ,,.:,v ' ti-.'.l','.1•f !rf.t: . [iii,
'6~\ ~:.t; '.:/.Jh • !,{(,/· r---:., ·-'l(f!"• :1;~~-'
piedmont as well as the Kings Mountain belt.
pPmg FOLIATED TO MASSIVE GRANITIC ROCK
Thjs map unit occurs in the Raleigh belt and the Eastern Slate belt as well as the Kings Mountain belt and includes the High Shoals, Rolesville, Wise, Lemon Springs, Butterwood Creek,. and Rocky Mount granites. Goldsmith and others (1988) described the lligh Shoals granite as a . coarse-grained, porphyritic, well-foliated biotite granite. A review of other papers that include descriptions of one or more of these boilies shows that some of the rock bodies are composed of several intrusive phases exhibiting cross-cutting relationships and differing in texture and degree of foliation. The rocks are megacrystic to equigranular granite to quartz monzonite. For more information see Parker (1979), Speer and others ( 1980), Campbell (1985), and Bolton (1985). ·
Jd DIABASE
Burt and others (1978) complied a map of this rock type that illustrates its wide distribution throughout the Piedmont and Triassic basins. They described it as, dark-gray to greenish-black, fine-to medium-grained material with plagioclase, augite, and olivine as the primary minerals. Ragland and others (1983) reported that a subordinate number of dikes contain quartz instead of olivine. This rock type occurs as thin sheet-like boilies most co=only steeply ilipping or vertical and cross-cutting but rarely sub-horizontal especially in the Durham area. For further description of diabase see the section on Triassic Basins. Some diabase dikes and adjacent fractured rocks are conduits for the movement of groundwater.
Inner Piedmont Belt, Chauga Belt, Smith River Allochthon, and Sauratown Molll!tain£ Anticlinorium )".,,.,..~~ .-::•-i1·;..
~}~: (1955rhe O~e~~~r!~e~~ntB~lt(l;;,~) ~~~c~~~~ ~yde~a~~:~tr;:stc;;~onG~~f~: ;,:'.!;;t; Inner Piedmont belt of South Carolina that is somewhat applicable to North 1::t Carolina. Griffin (1971) further described the Inner Piedmont belt, especially .•..ftlf of South Carolina, with emphasis on structure and tectonics. In spite of the ":\,:'¼j; earlier work, Butler (1972) felt that the geology of the Inner Piedmont belt 1~·1-., was poorly known. The work of Goldsmith and others ( 1988) on the Charlotte
I. ·. iz,l\1 ° x 2° sheet added significantly to what we. know about .the Inner Piedmont -.::'t.belt, but Butler's (1972) opinion is still valid. This lack of detailed · 1· 1'.~•.· understanding of the Inner Piedmont belt is related to complexity of the i >ti.structure, lack of recognizable primarily stratigraphic features, lack of ,;'l.l)!jidistinctive marker beds, deep weathering, and, not least, lack of a strong ·,•~t;'.);econ_omic impetus to study the rock. s. Goldsmith and others_ (1988) gav_e a :;/;i;_,detailed summary of the Inner Piedmont belt. Many of the s1gnif1cant porn ts '"•:••.:(,of their summary are condensed in the following paragraph. i!_~.-i(r~ ,•:.ci~"'r:· l.{f,:f The stratified rocks are predominantly thinly layered mica schist and . '.\i::gneiss. These are inter layered with amphibolite, calc-silicate rock, 'f:\t'fihornblende gneiss, quartzite and rare marble. There are two stratigraphic l\t.·suites, a predominantly mafic lower suite which occupies the flanks of the ttinner Piedmont belt and the upper suite of interlayered mica schist, biotite • ''i:'\Paragneiss, and minor calc-silicate rock which occupies the core. With I,, }:respect to metamorphic grade, · the core is characterized by \_silliman.ite-muscovite and the flanks by staurolite-kyanite. Many masses of ~ < •.
·~•·,
S3
I
I
i I
!i I
I
Ii ,·
I
... _ =.: i.r';!i •:;rlh-r~~-i'l--~M"'
1,-:,,1. M
C. -C:12.L LA:
NORTH' CAR'OEINA
. ,,,_:_,, , .. PEPARJMENT,OF}CON. SE.RYATiON .:~N D::i>'EvELOPMENT ?'L C ·.;.:-t:.;]:,,/)tr
I .... .
.
.
,.•
ill !;;1 ,,-
~ l,¼1 -~· .... ,
'
.
~-••
C ·t ~~, if.?' ~ !Wl, f~lff t~f~·
\'ij) ~~----.f, ..
Ei,,
'
f"
~
t ., ..
If.
~~. ,.
'~1 n ; .
'
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATE!l IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA 47
GASTON COUNTY
(Area, 3~S square miles; population in 1950, 110,S36)
Gcogrn11hy 111111 physiography.-Gaston County lies in the south-central part of the Charlotte area.
Gastonia, with a population of 23,003, is the largest municipality and the county seat. Textile manufac-
turing is the largest industry in the county although there is considerable farming activity. The county is
we II served by railroads and paved roads .
Gaston County is a rolling upland portion of the Piedmont province, the general altitude being slight-
ly more Uian S00 feet. Some of the streams have incised their valleys as much as 200 feet below the up-
land, and as a result the topography near the streams is quite hilly. Rising several hundred feet above the
general level of the country are several pronounced northeast trending ridges, all of which are composed
of resistant quartzite. Prominent among these are Kings .Mountain Pinnacle, Crowders Mountain, and
Spencer .Mountain.
The county is drained by Catawba River, which flows south along the east boundary. The main tribu-
taries of the Catawba flow southeastward across the general trend of the rocks and for the most part are
not noticeably influenced by any differential resistance of rocks to erosion. The tributaries are closely
spaced, resulting in a fine-textured drainage pattern and the absence of extensive, flat interstream areas .
With the exception of South Fork Catawba River, the streams have fairly short steep courses, and conse-
quently are rather swift.
Geology.-Numerous types of rocks occur in Gaston County (fig. 13), and their relations one with an-
other are complex. The general northeast schistose structur.e prevails so that rocks of eastern Cleveland
County extend northeastward into the western part of Gaston.
Mica schist forms the dominant host rock into which the granite was injected in Gaston County. Nat-
urally enough, the granite did not intrude the ·schist evenly and in a few areas granite is either scant or ab-
sent in the schist. The belt of schist 2 miles east of Gastonia· and parts of the schist near Kings Mountain
Pinnacle and Crowders Mountain contain very little granite. Muscovite or sericite, and quartz are generally
the chief components of the schist although manganese and chlorite are not uncommon.
Composite rocks in which mica schist and granite are interlayered, generally in northeast trending
belts, are widespread in the western two-thirds of the county. The largest belt in which the schist is pre-
dominant surrounds Kings Mountain Pinnacle and extends through the western side of Bessemer City to
High Shoals in the northern part of the county. The schist is subordinate in quantity to the granite in• the
area between Dallas and Stanley and along the Cleveland County line southeast of Cherryville.
Several masses or belts of homogeneous or nearly homogeneous granite occur in Gaston County. The
largest of these extends northward from the basin of South Crowders Creek at the South Carolina line,
through Gastonia to Lincoln County east of .High Shoals. One finger of this mass extends southwestward
to Bessemer City where it is the type locality for Keith's Bessemer granite." Another large mass of gran-.
ite occurs southeast of Cherryville .
The granites are not uniform in appearance and mineral constituents. The granite. at Bessemer City
is locally more gneissic and contains more biotite than most of the granite in the county. The granites for
the most part have a light color and medium texture, although small bodies within the complex proper are
coarse textured and niay be called pegmatite.
Gneisses and schists, containing hornblende as a prominent dark mineral, are common in Gaston· Coun-
ty. In addition to the numerous lenses of hornblendic rocks interlayered with other country rocks, several
large areas of hornblende gneiss occur. One of these, in the vicinity of Beaverdam Creek in the northwest-
ern part of the county, has been studied in some detail.'° Soils derived from the hornblende gneiss are gen-
erally dark brown or red in color and are more fertile than those from other rocks.
A composite rock in which diorite and granite appear as intermixed bodies occurs in a general north-
south belt along the eastern border of the county. This belt extends eastward into Mecklenburg County
~Keith, .Arthur, op. clt., p. 4.
:«Kesler, T. L., Correlation of some metamorJ)hic rocks ·tn the central Carolina Piedmont: Geol. Soc. or America Bull.. vol. 55,
p. 773, 1944. .
r-----• figure 13 ---------EXPLANATION m Mita schist ~ Mica schist and granite 1ehist J)redominant D Granite and mica schisl llflnite p1edominanl □ Granite ~ Oiorlte and granite (horite predominant GIE]· Granite and diorite a••Mt predomin1nt (lill Hornblende gne!u and granite inler1ain -Hornblende gneiss [ill Gabbro-diorile ar>d an.ed basic roe~, ,tillllll!lil Quartl!te -limestone Arrangement of 11nits. one above Jhe o\he,, doe, not _ ind,ca1P chronological •~uence. AG units are Pa!eozoie age or otder, Geolog,e bou"<lanes are appro .. mate. , I ·o N sou GEOLOGIC MAP OF GASTON COUNTY 0 SCALE MILES FIGURE 13.-GEOLOGIC MAP OF GASTON COUNTY. ---- -/✓ Geoloe>' by H. £. LeGrand and M. J, Mundorf!. ·-.,_--.:,. 00 C} "' ~ 0 C'} "' > z 0 C} "' 0 C: z 0 :;; > ;;J "' z >-I :,: "' •("} :,: > . "' . t"' 0 >-I >-I "' > "' f.: z 0 "' >-I :,: ("} > "' 0 t: z· > ___ ,,,___•r~•-••>e•~.,.-~~~~~~~~~~~.:oiJtt~~!;t:..,1.f'.~~~'i?:~~~E~~w-."!-:";~~..f~.~~~~~~~)~~·?;::iifi~~~~~tf~;~~½~{i-!~~t~.i~f#f:~,--f.i~~l~~:~t~t~~~.1
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARL:OTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA 40
where it is of greater prominence. The rocks of the complex are not well exposed, and as a consequence
their relation with adjacent rocks to the west is not certain. In this connection, a zone of diorite and diorite
gneiss extending northeastward through Lowell is adjacent to the complex and may be. genetically related
to it. South of Mt. Holly the amount of granite appears to be subordinate to diorite but northward the dio-
rite is subordinate in amount. Pronounced granular disintegration is characteristic of both components of
the complex in the Charlotte area.
Several northeast-trending belts of quartzite occur in the central part of Gaston County. The ridges
that they form by their resistance to erosion serve to show the broad structural trends of the rocks. In the
area south of Crowders Mountain, Keith" has noted three divisions of the quartzite, namely kyanite quartz-
ite, white, nearly pure quartzite, chloritic quartzite, and seritic quartzite. The beds of quartzite are con-
sidered to be of the same general age, but the relation of one with another is not clear.
Ground 1Yutcr.-Most of the domestic water supplies, many of the industrial supplies, and two of the
municipal supplies in Gaston County are obtained from wells (fig. 14). Most of the water in rural sec-
tions comes from dug wells that derive water from the weathered and disintegrated zone between the soil
and the underlying unweathered rock. Where the unweathered rock lies near the surface difficulty· may
arise in digging a well deep enough to obtain a dependable well. The failure of dug wells is not confined
to any one rock type although attempts to dig wells on upland areas underlain by quartzite are likely to
be unsuccessful.
Records of more than 200 drilled wells are included in the table of well data. The records of 151 wells
were complete enough for use in compHing table 11 below.
TADI.E 11.-SUM:;U,\nY OF DATA OX \VELI.S IN GASTOX COUNTY
(Drilled wells 3 inches or more in diameter)
Trr!I or Roc1:
&:hlllt. •• _____ •••••.. __ .••. ------··
Granite ....... -.. -......... ----....
All w,•lls ...•.•.. ___________ .•••..
'fOPOORAPIIIC LOCATION
Hill----·---·--·-············-·----
Flat. __ .-·---···-·--·----·· ....... .
Slope ... ··-.-····---·-· --··. ---·· ·-
Draw·-·-· ____ ---·-··---·····. __ ·--
Valley ....... ___ .······-· ... ______ _
:-:Keith, Arthur, op. cit., (folio 222) p. 5.
ACCORDING TO ROCK TYPE
Yield (gallons a miuute)
N'umber of Aver11gc
welh tlepth
erect) Range Average Per foot
of well
73 180 0-150 23 • 13
" 105 0-100 18 . II
151 li2 0-150 21 1"
ACCORDING TO TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Nlltnber of
well,
"
8
H
"
Averago
depth
(feet)
103
191
179
"'
Yield {g11Uo11s 11, miuute)
Range Average
0-"
Ii-40 18
1-\liO 25
2-lOZ 26
0-25 "
Per foot
of well
.07
.13
. 13
. "
. 10
Percent of wells
yie!tlin11; I gallon
a minute or
ll'llll,
'
'
'
PerCt>ot of welb
-yicldi1111; l 11:allon
7
0
0
2.5
------ --
MAP OF
GASTON COUNTY
SHOWING LOCATION OF WELLS
-
n gt/ ~,
I
I _,_
0
- ----
SCALE
M1LES
FIGURE 14.-J\IAP OF GASTON COUNTY SHOWING LOC..\TION OF WELLS
----
\
-. -~ ' ~,,£:.; ~ ... \~~)> ·""'1
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN. THE GHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA 51
Although the wells in table 11 were drilled in schist and granite, some of the wells probably. penetrat-
ed other types of rocks also. As the spacing between the different rocks can be measured in terms of feet
and inches it is inevitable that many wells pass through rocks other than that indicated at the top of the
well. The schist is composed of muscovite and quartz in most places, but it may contain beds of horn-
blende gneiss and schist, pegmatites, and other rocks.
Table 11 indicates that the average depth of wells in schist is 180 feet and that the average yield is
23 gallons a minute; this compares with an average depth of 165 feet in granite and an average yield of
18 gallons a minute. If average yield per foot of well is considered, the water-yielding characteristics of
the schist is only slightly greater than that of granite. The average yield of wells in both schist and
granite is 21 gallons a minute, which is 4 gallons a minute higher than. the average for ail wells in the
Charlotte area. It is not certain that the higher yield of wells. in Gaston County is significant because
the same general geology and topography occur also in Lincoln and Cleveland Counties.
The part of table 11 showing the relation of average yield and average yield per foot of well to the
topography is significant. Wells located on hills have by far the smallest average yield and average yield
per foot of well. In addition 7 percent of the wells on hills in the county yield 1 gallon a minute or less. As
is the case in the Charlotte area as a whole, the wells on hills yield only about half as much water per foot
of well as wells.in draws.
Analyses of samples of water from nine wells and one spring in Gaston County are given in a table
following the well records. All but well 97 penetrated schist or granite or both schist and granite. Well
97 penetrated both granite and diorite. The water ranged in hardness from 26 to 158 parts per million.
The iron content ranged from 0.08 to 8.6 parts per million. Water from different wells in the towns of
Cherryville and Stanley showed a considerable local variation in content of iron.
Analysis of water from one spring is shown in the table. This water contained only 59 parts per mil-
lion of dissolved solids, despite the fact that it flows from hornblende gneiss, one of the most readily
soluble rocks of the Charlotte area. The low mineral content of this spring 'Yater is thought to be typical
inasmuch as water from springs normally flows through the rocks more rapidly than water from wells.
Temperatures of waters ranged from 60' to 66' F. and averaged 62' F. The water having a tempera-
ture of 66' F. is pumped from a well 1,053 feet deep.
There are two municipally owned ground-water supplies in Gaston County; in addition the town of
McAdenville is supplied with water from a well owned and operated by a mill.
Cherryville, population 3,486; obtains its water from eight wells in various parts of the town. All the
wells penetrate granite. The wells range from 132 to 238 feet in depth and from 10 to 75 gallons a min-
ute in yield. ·. Six of the wells yield approximately 20 gallons a minute each. The chemical quality of the
water is good. The total dissolved ·solids of the water from any of the wells .does not exceed 115 parts
per million. The water receives no regular treatment. ·. ·.
Stanley, population 1,645, obtains its· supply from four wells. Three of the wells are at least 350. feet
deep. They·vary in yield from 15 to 45 gallons a minute .. The water from the ·four wells contains i:nore
than the average amount. of mineral matter for all wells in the county and Is slightly hard; the water
fr~m well 10 contained 4.9 parts per million of iron on November 20, 1947. The water is not treated.
McAdenville, population 1,059, is supplied with water from a well owned by Stowe Mills, Inc. The
well, 132, is 523 feet deep and yields In excess of 100 gallons a minute. A field test showed·the water had
a total hardness of 230 parts per million. The water Is not treated.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
52 GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
RECORIJ!-l OF 'WELLR IK GA8TON COUNTY
W,11
""·
Locn10H OWNER 0Bll,U:R Type of ...
5 miles NE. of Mount Holly •.•• Duke Power Co ..••••• II, L, I,111,r......... Cr-Dr
•... do .•.••••.••••.•••••••.••• ." .• do ••••• · •••.••••..•••. do •. : ••••••••.•• Cr-Dr
..•. do ...•••••••••.•.•.••••.••.•.. do __ :1_:'" • •••.. ·•.do ..•••.•.•••••• Cr--Drr
Lucia, 6 miles N. of Mount
Holly ••.•.•••••••.••••••••• Mn. W, T. Bea.tty _ _-__ Juliua Hagtt .••••..• Cr-Dr
$ •••• do •..•• -·_ .•••••.• · .•..••• J. A. Mclotaib ..•••••••.••••.•••••••••...• Dug
..•• do ••.•••••.•.......••..••• \\', C. Mcl11t011h." ••••.. ······---~----······ DUg
Etanley ..••••••••••••••••..•• G. K.. Derr .•••.•••......•.....•.. -•••••.•• Cr-Dr
8 ••.. do ....••••.•••.•....••.... H. C. MunlfO ••..•..••.•••••••••••••••••.. Cr-Dr
9 •••• do •.•••..••.......•......• Town •.......•••...•. Va. Mach. Co ..•.•.. Dr
10 ..•• do .•••••••.............•..•... do ......•.•.....•••••• do .............. Dr
11 •... do •••••••••.•••.•.....•.•...•• do •••••••.•...•••..... do •.•••••••••••• Dr
Ila •••. do ......•••.•.......•..•.....• do •••.••••....•••...••..•• · •••..•••••• Dr
12 •••• do •••••••••••••.•••••••.•• LolaMilh,,lnc ...••••••••••••••••••••••••• Dr
13 •••• do ..•••••••••.•.•••••••••••.•. do •••••••••.•••••••••••.•••••••••••••• Dr
U Alciia, 3 milel!I NW of ..••...... B. D. Bradahaw .......••••••..••.......... Dr
15 2milesSE.ofHighSbo&la •••.•• Hardin Mfg.Co ..••••.......•.•.•.• ~ ••••.. Dr
16 lliah Shoab ••••••••••••••.••. Caroliuian Mill .••.•.•.••••••••••••••••••.. Dr
17 •••• do ••..••••..••.•...••••••••.•. do •.•..........••• R. E. Faw ......•... Dr
IS •••• do ••.•••••...•.....•.••...•... do ......••.....•••••••................••••..•.
19 2milnW.ofHigh8hoala •..•.• P.A.Kiscr .••••••••.. Va.Mach.Co .•••••• Dug-Dr
20 2¾ milea W. of High Sboala.... Ml'II. M.A. Carpe11ter •••••• do.............. Dr
21 4 miles W. of High Shoala...... A. M. Kiser.......... Robhin1............ Dr
22 .••• do........................ D. C. Kiser •••.•••••....•• do.............. Dr
23 4½ miles W. of High Shoala ••.. Forn:1t Dallin&er •••••••••• do .•.•••..••..•• Dr
24 6milcsW.ofHir;hShoals ••.••• W.E.Kiaer ••••••..•. ~ ••• do •••••••••••••• Dr
25 4 mill'I SW. of High Shoals..... A. L. Barbee ••••.••••• Robbim............ Dr
:?Ii 6milesE.ofCberryvillc ••••... F.F.Allen ••••.....••..•• do .•.•.•.••••••• Dr
27 4,½ milc:B E. of C~rryville ....• G. A. Bell............ ••••..•••......••••. Dug
28 •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••• G. \\.'. Beam •••••••••• Robbinll .••.....•.•. Cr-Dr
211 3½ milea E. of Chmyville... •. B. R. Beam........... Hickory Pump Co... Dr
30 4 miles E. of Cherryville....... S. C. Carpenter....... Coffee?............. Cr-Dr
31 •••• do •••.••••••••••....••.... D. H, Carpenter ••••.•• COl!tner & Davis •••• Cr-Dr
32 3 milea E. of Cherryville .••.... Mn. Verna Pay110ur ••...•••.•.•••••.•.•••• Cr-Dr
33 •••• do •••••••••• •·:··········· C. G. Beam........... Hickory Pump Co... Dr
:U •... do ••••••••••••••••••••...•.... do .............•....•• do ..•••...•.•••. Dr
35 l,½mileaNE.ofCherry,·ille ....•••• do ••••••••••..••••.... Uo .••••••••••••• Dr
36 Cherryville ••••••••••••••••••• Carltoo Mills .....•... Robbirui .•......••.. Dr
37 •.•. do •••••••••••••••••••••••••... do •.................•• do .••••••.•••••• Dr
38 .... do........................ Carolina Freight
Carrier-a............ Hickory Pump Co... Dr
311 •••• do........................ Rhyot-HaU8Cr Co .••..•••• do .••••••••••••• Dr
40 .•.• do .•••••••••••.••.•••••....•.• do................ ....•.............•. Dr
41 •••. do ••••..•.•.••....••....•.•••• do •••••.•••.•.•••.•••••••••••••••••••. Dr
Depth
or weU
(feet)
437½
219
305
36
23
34
" · 130
3/,(}
500
350
400
70
" BO
226
319
351
100
160
404
"
83
105½ ,o
128
143
34
BO
121
"
127
100±
"' 100
"' " "'
300
170
190?
200±
Diame«!r
or well
(inchea)
3
6
24
18
2
6
6
6
,. 6
8
Depth or
ca.sin1
(feet)
34
'°
26
Water Jf!vel I
(feet bt-klw
aurfact)
18 ,.
30
"
26
20
Yidd
(1.p.m,)
S--8
S--10
10
"
"
21
,_,
"
30
"
6 120± 66 5-6
6 60 10-15
5 !J/8 •...••...•..•••••••....•..
Ii Ii/& ' 73 ••• • •••••• 30-40
Tol&l h.iard-
n-(fitld
WIila)
(p.p.m.)
20
..
'°
30
35
" ..
'°
ll0
" ..
"'
40
65/8 •••••••••••••••.•. £ ········-···
Ii ti/8 ······•· •••••••••• 4-£ 30
56/8 •.••••••....•..... 10 60
Ii li/8 ······•· ..•.•••••• ····•••· •••·•·•·•••• 48 24 ade-
3
6 100
40
" 30
6 5/8 •••···•· ··•••••••·
6 •••••••• ••········
quate
l
7
'
!J 6/8 •••••.•• ... . ••••.• 25-30
Ii !J/8 •••••••• ••···•··•• 25-30
" 8 28
20
"
20
"'
.. ,o
" "
"
35
" 35
········••··
RUURII
Granite. Well at water tank,
Flat .
Granite. Well at commiaaary.
Slope .
Not U300.
Supplie1 water to achoo!, farm
Ind home. Granite.' Draw.
Granite. Slope.
Granite, Good yield reported.
Hill.
Granite. Hill
Granite. Atonetimeaupplied
13 families and 1everalatore1
Draw.
62° F. Graoite. Analysia.
\Veil ia at tank. Hill.
62½° F. Granite. Analysis.
Well is one-fourth mile north
of tank. Hill.
62½° F. Gra11ite. Ana\ylia.
Well is•sw. of town: Hill.
Granite. Pumpacltin1tat 150
feet; drawdown rapid but
held at 20 g.p.m. at 160 foot
aetting, Slope.
Granite. Well at rc11ervoir.
Hill.
Dye house well. Hill.
Scbiat. Formerly u,ed by AW•
mill; large yield reported.
Slope,
Granite. Uae Ii h.p. pump.
Valley.
Granite. Uae Ii h.p. pump.
draw-.
Schist. Uae IO h.p. pump.
Slope.
Griwite. Valley.
Dug 61 rt., drilled 99.
Hill
Schist. Good yield reported,
Slope.
60° F. Bchiat. CouJd not
lower wa.tet-level with
bailu. Flat,
Schiat. Hi!L
Hill
Slope.
Hill
Slope.
Hill.
Water reported 110ft, with no
iron. Hill.
Water reported soft. Slope,
Slope.
Hill
Hill.
Wellauppliessi1 houses. Slope.
Well by wuh house. Draw.
61}.f' F. Well at west end of
wute houac. Draw,
Draw.
61¾° F. Dra'II'.
63¾° F. Draw,
62¼° F. Draw.
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
w .. 11
'"·
LO<'ATTOS Ows1:R DRILLt;R Type or
"'"
42 Clicrryvillc ••••.••••.......... Dora Yam ~li!lrl ..••.. Ralph Robliilll!I ..•... Dr
42a •••• do .••••.........•••••••.••.... do ..........•••••. ------·-··-----····· Dr
43 •... tlo ........•••••••••••••... Town ..........•••••• Ltt .•••.•.•••.••.•. Dr
-14 .... do .•.•••••..................•• do ••••.•..•.......••••••••••.•.....•.• Dr
45 .•.• do ..•.•.........••••••••...... do ..........•...•. ------·---·---·-···· Dr
46 •••. do ..•••.. __ .....•••••.•••• _ .•. do ... ______ .•.•• __ Lee ••• ____ •••••••••••••••••
4i .... Jo •••••••••.........••....•.•• Jo ••••••••••••.....••.••••••••••••••....•.••••
~8 .... Jo .••••••.....•...•..•....•••• Jo................ Rol,bin1 •.•••...........•.••
49 ••.. Jo .............••.••..••...... Jo ............•...••••••••........•••• Dr
/iO •••• <10 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• tlo .•.•.....••.•............••..••..... Dr
51 •••. Jo .•••••........•.••....•.•••• do .......•..........•.••••••........•• Dr
52 •••• Jo ..•...........•••••••••...•• do •...............•.•.••••••.•......•• Dr
53 .... JoH••···················· ..•. ~o .•......•.•••.•.•.••.•••......•.•••• Dr
5~ .... Jo ••.•••••••................•• do •••.•.••••••••••.•......•.•••••••••• Dr
55 .... do .•••••..... · ......••••.•• Nuway Spinnin,: Co .... R&lpb Robbina .•••.. Dr
M •••. do .... · .... · ••••••••••.....•.. do •...............••.. do .••.......•.•• Dr
5i .•.. Jo .•••..........•.••..•••• Rhyne-Ha1.111er ~ffg.
Co ...........•.•••.•••• Jo •••.......•••• Dr
58 .... Jo .•••••••..................•• do •••....•••••••••..•. Jo •.•...•.••••.. Dr
59 •.•• do •••••...........••.•..•• Howell Mfg. Co .•••.•...•. do •••.•••••••••• Dr
IIU •••• Jo .•...........••••.••.••••••. tlo ................ Robbins •.........•• Dr
61 .... do ••••••••...•••••.•.......... do ••......•.•••••..... Jo .•.......••••. Dr
02 4½ miles SE. of Cherryville.... Tryon School. ..........•• Jo.............. Dr
OJ .... do •.••••••••.••••••••.•... Fred Biggerstaff ••.....•••• do ..•.......•.•• Dr
64 •.•• do ••••.•.................. Anderson Hager ....•...... doH••·········· Dr
65 3}1 miles SW. o( Besiemer City D. L. Kiser ..•.••••.•..... do •• ~········:·· Dr
66 3 mill'II N"W. of Bessemer City. C. C. Harrelson ••••••.•••• do .•••......•.•• Dr
6i 2!'2 mile. XW. ofHessemcr City. R. V. Ouiton... ••.... Hickory Pump Co... Dr
68 3 miles W. of Dalla.a .••••.•.... Joe Holland .•.•......••••••••.•........•. Dug
69
;o
71
72
"
I¼ miles W. of Dalla, ••••••••. R. E. Summey ..•.•... Robbins .•••.•....•. Dr
2 mi!ell SW. of Dallaa ........•. E. D. Pasour ••••..•...... do .••.....•••••• Dr.
l¼ miles W. of Dallaa ••••••.•• County Home ..••.••.••••••••••••.•.••... Dr,
I mile SW. of Dallaa ........... C. S. Vin~nt......... Robbin11 ......•••••• Cr-Dr
Dallna .•••••••••••...•.•..... Moroweb Cotton Mills
CO .•.....•...•.•••.•••••••••.......•••• Dr
74 Half.mile W. o( Spencer
~fountain .................. Sam Love ••••........ R&lph Robbiu .•••.. Dr
75 Spencer ~fountain .......•.•.•• Spencer Mountain
Mill ••••••••••• ·•· ••• R. E. Faw ......•••• Dr
76 I¼ mile NW. of Mount Holly.. Globe Milb, Inc .• ,,... . .•.•••• •. • .••• ••• . . Dr
77 •.•. do ......•.....•.•••••••••••.• ·Jo •••...•••••••••.•••••••••.....•••••• Dr
78 1 mile NW. of Mount Holly ..•. Kendrick Brick &
Tile Co .•.. ." •· •• · •• .•••.••••.• .••• ••••. Dr
79 •••. do •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do ••••••••••••••••....••••••••••..•.•• Cr-Dr·
80 1 mile S. of Mount Holly •.•.•. American YU11, Inc
Nim1_ Plant ••••••••• J. 8. Hinson •.•••••• Dr
81 3 milN N. of Mount Holly ..•.. Dukti Powu Co.
82
83
1H
Moulltain lalanJ
Dam •.....•.••.....••••...•..•••••••••• Cr-Dr
2½ miles N. of Mount Holly... Duke Powu Co.
Supply Yard ••••...• H. L. Luer ••.•••••• Cr-Dr
Mount Holly................. Duka Power Co ..••.••.•••••••••••••••.••.•..•.•.•
2 miles S. of Mount' !Jolly...... Superior YU11 Milli
Tuckai,egee Plant •••. R. E. Faw ...•••.••. Dr
Depth
of well
(feet)
250
300
180 ,oo
200±
238
182
li7
150-200
150-200
132
1'3
150
210
178½
150½
196½
"'
139
90
"" 125
119
157
H2
120
330
"
142
146
95
82
65 1
130
82
6'±
143
60
16'
""
300+ ..
223
Diamt;>ter or 11'tU
(inchrs)
5 5/8
8
Depth of Watrr level
ca11in11; (fed below
(tttt) 11urfate)
46 ,.,
0
5 5/8 ........••••••••••
8
"
5 5/8 •••••••• 100
5 5/8 .........••...•••.
5 5/8 ..•..••• 90
5 5/8 ··•••••• ••·•···•••
5 5/8 .••••••.
5 5/11 ....... . " 90
Yield
(p;.p.m.)
10
40
"' 30
"
"
30
20
,0
20-2'
:?0-25
20-25
55/8 ....•••• 40 25
55/8 118 41 18
5 5/8 .••.•••. ••····•••• 10-12
5 5/8
5 5/11
80
118
5 5/8 ······•· ···••·•••·
5 5/8 ··•••••• ........•.
5 5/8 ........ ••····••••
5 5/8 75
5 5/8 90
5 5/8 54 29
80
10
26
18
' " 20
Tot.al ha.rd-
nesa (field
te11U!)
(p.p.m.)
60 ,o
,o
" "
"
30
5 5/8 ...••... ··•••••••• ....•..•.••.••••••.•
5 5/8 ••••••••
30
5 5/8
5 5/8
'
"
120
102
5 5/8 101½
6
3
8
2
8
14
20
3.1
82½
18
'"
0
12
18
10
'
18
1' ·
10
0
2-3
....
46
"
" " " 3.1
50
"
" " 40
" ..
60
" ..
53
R,aunic:11
Not useJ; insufficient yield.
Draw.
6111 F. Draw.
On F..:lat '.\fa.in St~t. fut.
At old Chmyv:ille Mfg. Co.
Slope.
Ana.lyais. Well :?00 yJa. S. of
Chmyville Cotton '.\!ill A.
nalyais in table. Dra•.
Analy&a. Under water tank.
Hill.
Attoolho115e. Capped. Hill.
At the pump ,tation. Hill.
At ta11k; in yard. Hill
Analysis. Behind Cannery.
Slope. '
At c;&11Dery. Slope.
Analyaia. South of tank, on
cannery lot. Ora•.
Near Nu•Way mi\111.
Draw.
Ora•.
Pinnt 2. Draw.
Plant 2. not used; iru1ufficient
water. Hill.
Company •ell 1. Hill
Compauy well 2. Hill.
Hill.
Schiat. Hill.
Schut. Dra•.
Water reported to contain iron.
Schist.
Schlllt. Large yie1d,aort water
and no iron reported. Hill
Soft W'ater reported. Schist.
Slope.
Well drilled on granite leda;e.
Granite. Hill tWI
Granite. Good yield reported.
Slope.
Granite. Slope.
Granite. Slope.
Granite. Hill
v ...
J111t beJow top of sharp hill.
Schist.
Quartaite. Dr••·
UaeJ by mill and village. Slope. -
Uisod by mill and villag,e. Hill
Diorite. Hill.
61° F. Di«ite. Slope.
Well not used; no nter ob-
tained. Diorite. Valley.
Gr&nite. Suppliea II families.
Slope.
Granite. Hill
Suppliea 3 hOUlel .
152° F. Schiatf Supplies vill•
&(II. Slope.
l
i I i,
I
I
' I ,, ,, I:
1·
I
I
I
I
,1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
RECORDS OF' WELI,f. IX GASTOX Cou:.TY-Continued
Wt>ll LocATION' 0wNCR DnlLLIUt
Depth
Type or or well
•ell (red)
85 2 milell 8. of Mount Holly .••••. Superior Yl.l'n Milla,
Tuck.witt Plant ••. Carter ••••••..••••• Cr-Dr 86 2½ milea SW. of Mount Holly .. J. W. Byrd ••.•••••••. J. W. Robbin■ ..••.• Cr-Dr 87 North Belmont ••.••••••••..••• Acme Spinning Co..... •.....•••••••..••••• Dr 88 •... do .•....••••••..••..••••....•• do .••••...•••••••.•••.•.•••..••••.•... Dr
89 •... do .•••..••••••••••.••••.•..••. do .••••••.•••••••.•••••••.•..••••••.•• Dr
90 •••• do.-· •••.••••• · .••.••••...
Ul •••• do ..... · •••.•• ,~·· •••...••
Linford Milb, Inc .•••....•.•.••...••••.•... Dr
Perfection Sp~nin1
Co .................................... Dr 92 .~ •• do ....•••.•••••••••••.•.•• F. E. Dradaha• .•.••• ~ HarUlem .•••....••• Cr-Dr U3 •.•. do........................ Sto1Je Spinning Co..... Hickory Drilling
Co .•••••...•••••• Dr
94 ..•. do •..•.•••••..••••... · ••..•... do .••••.•.....•.•• Rohl,illll ..••.••.•.•. Dr US •... do ..••••..•••.•.•.•••.•••....• do ....•••••••..... \\·We •••••.....•••• Dr
96 •... do ..•.•••••.•••••.•••••.•••.•. do •••...•••••••••• Wine(?) ••••..••••• Dr
• Oi I½ milea N. of Brlmont........ llelmont Abbey....... V1. Mach. Co....... Dr 08 I mile NW, of IMmont. •••.•.• South Fork Mf11;. Co .•• Sydnor Well Co ..... Dr
00 Delmont. ••••.•••••..•••••..• Climax Spinning Co .••••••••....•.••••. : .•• Cr-Dr 100 •... do .••.••••••..••••.••••••. St.-rling Spinnioa: Co .•• Sydoor Well Co..... Dr
101 •... do .••••..•••.••••••.••• .' •. Crescent Spinoing Co ..•.•...•.•.•.....•••. Cr-Dr 102 •••. do ..••....•••...••••..•••••••. do .••..••• ~ ••••... R. E. Fa•.•········ Dr
103 •.•. do .••••.•...•••.•••••...•. National Yarn Milla.~ ••••....••••••..••••• Cr-Dr
104 ••.. do .•••....••••..•.•••...•••.•. do ••••......•••...••.......••.•.•.•••• Cr-Dr 105 .••• Jo •....••••...••....•••....... do ••...•••••....••.••••.•....••••••.•. Cr-Dr
106 •••• do........................ Imperial Yarn Milb.
l0i
108
109
110
foe ..••...••••••.... Kirklt>y .••..••.•••. Cr-Dr ..•• do ..••••••..••••..•••••.•....• do ..•.•••...•••••.•••. do ....•••••.•••• Cr-Dr .•.. do ••..•.••••....•••...•••.•... do .••...•••••••..•...•.••••...•••••••. Dr •.•• do ..•••••.•.••••••••.•.....•.. do ••..•••••...•••••••.......•••••...•• Cr-Dr •... do •••...•••••...••••..•••• Montbell Ice&: Fuel
Co •••..•••••••••••.••••..•..•••••....•• Dr Ill •••. do .••.•.•.•••••.••••••.•••.••. do •.•••••.••.••..•...•.••••••....••••• Cr-Dr 112 I mile S. of Delmoot •..•.••••.. Henry Lioeberii:er
P. \\'. Mu1111 (Tl'nant} Robbina............ Dr I 13 IJ/4' mile:a S, of BehnonL....... Mr. Mather80n •...•••.•••. do.............. Dr 114 I mile SW. of Hdmont ••••...•• MW Florence Abee
R. L. Drook.a
(Tenant) •..•••...••.••• do .•.....••••..• Dr 115 4milel!ISE.ofBelmont. •••••.•. W.G.Drennan ••••••.•.•. do .•••••....•••• Dr 116 •.•• do •••.•.••••...••••••••••• J.M.Bo.,en
S. 8. Benfield ...•••••••. do .....••••...•• Dr Iii 1¼ mile11 SW. of Belmont. •.••• Eagle Yarn Milla •••... Wine (7) ••••••••••• Dr I 18 I½ miles SW. of Cramerton ..•. H. R. Lane ••••...••.. Burris .••••••..••••• Dug-Dr
IIU 2 miles W. of Craruertoo .• . ••• • W. S. Quinn.......... Robbins............ Dr · 120 ..•• do ....••....•••.•..••••... Arthur Sugp ••••..•.....• do ......•••••.•• Dr 121 4 milesSE.ofGutonia ••••.•.• Plantation Pile •.....•• Hamilton ...••••..•• Dr 122 l½milest-:W.ofCramerton •••. L. \\'.Faries ..•••••..• Ralph Robbins ••...• Dr. 123 .•.. do ..•••....••....••••..••• Church of God ..•••••.•••...•••••...•••••• Cr·Dr 12.f •••• do .••.•.•••••...•••...•••• W. E. Mitd,c!L •••... llalph Robbina •••••• Dr
125 ••.• do ••...••••.•••••••••••••.•••. do .••••..••••...•••... do •......••••... Dr 126 .••• do •••••.•...•••••••••••.•• \\'. J. Shettr •••.•.•••.•••• do ....•••••.•••• Dr 127 •••. do •••..••••••...•••...•••• R. Q. McAteer ..•••..••••. do .••••...•••.•. Dr
128 .••• do ..••••..••••......•••.•• Ree-oe Brandoo .•.•••••.••••••...•.•••..••• Cr-Dr
" '" '" 3,0
300
"' 200
l.M3
" 300
22'
340
325
. li0
3;5
100+
132
128
'" 132
"' 160
!OJ
"
80
100
112}:i
86
10,
72½
500
55½
83
IOI
83
" 121
39
Di.i.mf't-er
of well
{inchea)
' 6
8
' 3-2 ..
J0-8-6
10
'
3
10
3
10
Depth of Water l11vel
casing (feet belo•
(feet) aurface)
00
~6 (of
10inch)
60
"
00
23
"
Yield
(1.p.m.)
10+
' lO
30
"
"'
60.
2½
"
' 12-16
116
60
I½ •
12
'
Tot.I hard•
nea (6eld
ta<,)
(p.p.m.)
'" 60
60
60
60
"
" '°
80
50
60
'°
" 60
30
40
R11111,1,Rl8
Schist. Valley.
'1al
112° F. Schiat. Hill,
63° F. Schi~t. Company well
2; north aide of plant. Draw.
Schi,t. Company •ell l; f'aat
end of mill. Hill.
62¼° F. Schillt. Slope.
63¼° F. Schist. Slopl'.
ScLUlt. Hill.
1ill° F. Schist. Well ill crook.
ed •nd turbine can·t be Bet
lower than 85 ft. ao P1.1n1JJ11
only 35 g.p.m. Slope.
Schi■t. Behind church. Hill.
Schist. Yielded 60 gallons Pt·r
winule when drilled. Draw
SchUlt. Slope.
DraW'. Analyajs.
64¼° F. Schist. Pump Jet
to yield 45 g.p.m. Dra•.'
Schilt. Ridge.
Scbillt. Yielded JS g.p.m .
when drilled. Ora•.
62° P. Schist. Hill.
Schist. Well abandoned; not
enougl, water. Hill.
Schist. 62° F. At upper end
of will. Slope. 3
3
80
80
3½ .••••.•.•... Acroiss rlllld from mill. Slope, 3½ •........••• ScLL!lt. At lower cud.of mill.
3
3
•••...•. 35to40
35
6
6 6/8 •··•·••• 6 6/R i0
5 5/8 49
5 5/8 •••···••
6 6/8
8
18--6 31
.,
"
" "
-lO
6
' 8
II
30'·
"
" "
" '
" 27
2-3
75
90
"
"
35
40
35
125
1-lO
55/8 ••.••••.....•••... 25
5 5/8 liO 15 35
8 ··•••··· ·••·•·•••• 100 30 55/8 •..•••.....•...••.•.•••••• 40
2 •••••••• •••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••
6 5/8 ••···••• ····•••••· ½ ·•••••·••••·
Slope.
Schiat •
Schilt.
Do,
Schiat.
Do.
Do.
Schiat.
Dra• .
Gm1ite. Slope.
Suppliea ai1 holllC:I. Dra•.
Scbilt. Hill.
Schi,t. Slope.
63° F. Schist. Draw.
Schist Dug 31 fott. Rock ia
fine grained; green to gray
acbiat. Hill.
Granite. Slope.
63° FT. Grauite. HiJI.
Schist. Slope.
Hill.
Sup11liea O boUICII, Hill.
Schist. Not Ulll!d; not enough
'Irater, SJope. 6 6/8 60 3i
5 6/8 ··•••·•· ·••••·•••·
,0
3
•••••••..••• Slope.
•••••..•.••. Slope. 5 5/8 82 22 3¼ 25 A well 85 feet deep, 60 feet
from well 12i-Yielda I
gallon per mlllute, Slope.
I½ •••••••••••• ·Soft •al-er. $lop&.
I
I
I
I
I
I
jl
•
l1 I I i
J I
I I
I
I
I
I
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
RECOIIDS OF WELLS IX G.\STO:'i Cuu:-.TY-Continued
Well J.oCATION Owsr.R o,uu..i:n
Depth
Type of of ...-di
nn. well (feet)
129 :? milt'S XW. of Cramerton ....•. T. llop1.• ......•....••• Ralph ltobl,ins ..•••• Dr
130 ..•. tlo ________________________ I., C. Hoard .•........•••. Jo ........•..... Dr
131 ••.• do ••••••••••••••••••••.••••... do ...........•••••.... do .•...•.•••.•
13:? McAdeuville •••.•••••••••••••• S10..-p ~fill!, Inc ..••••• Hickory Pump Co
133 •••• Jo .•••.••..••.•...••.•.••..... Un .......•.....••• Rol,hins ..••..•..••• Dr
134 ..•. do ..••..•.•.••..•••.••••••..•. do .•.•.••••••••••• (?) ••••••••••••••••• Cr-Dr
1:15 ,~ niile E. of I.owell. ••.•.•.•.. Dr . .J. W. Reid
II. T. Ila.wk (1cna111). Ral11h Hol,hin~..... Or
130 f.owell •.•...••...••..••...... J. H. llu,bm1 ....•.•...................... Dr
137 •••• do ••••••••••••••••..••••.. Na1ional \\'eaviH1t C'o ...........•.....•••.• Or
J:18 •••• do ••••••••••••••.•••••••••.... do .•..................•••••••••••••••. Dr
139 •... do .•....•.••.•••••........•••• do ••••••....•.•.•.••••••.............. Dr
140 I mile SW. of Lowd!.. .•...••.. W. A. Froneherii:n •..•• Halph Rohbins .••••. Dr
Ill .... do .•••••••••••••••••••••.• Set1er'sCamr, ..•....•.... do .............• Or
112 2),.! mill-s E. or Gastonia....... G:utou Couutrr Club .•.... do.............. Or
11:l .... do .....•.•.•.............••••• do •••••••••.....•..••. do ....•......... Dr
1H 2 miles E. of C11.11to11ia... .••••. Akeni ~lot or Lines Co ..•••• do.............. Dr
115 :J!{ miles XE. ofCi115tm,ia •••.•. ,\ .. \I. Smrre ~lr11; ...•.. Ralph Robl,ins ...•.. Dr
l lfi .•.• do ••.•••••..••••••..••••••.•.. do .•.................. do ......•..•.... Dr
Mi ~ mile~ XE. of Ga.,tor1ia........ ltanln ~Ifie. Co ..•..•.•.••• do.............. Dr
US .... do ......••••••.......••••• Textika, lue.
Priscilla Plant ••.•••• Sydnor \\'ell Co..... Dr
149 ..•. do ..•••••••••••••••••••••••••• do ..•...........•. Ralph Robbin.1 ...... Dr
150 .••. do •••••••••••••••••••••••.. · .. do .................... do ...•••.•.•.••• Dr
ll'il .... du ....••••••••••••••••••••.... do .•.............. \'a. Mach. Co ......• Dr
152 ...• do ...•••••••••••••••.•••••.... do ............•...................•••• Dr
153 .... tlo .•.•••••••••••..••..•••• Rex Spinnin11: Co ......• Ralph Rohbins ...•.• Dr
154 •••• do •••.••••.•••.....••••.....•• do .••..•.•..•...••.•.. do •...••.••••... Dr
15.~ •.•• ,Jo .••...••.••••.....•......••• do •••••••••••.•••• (?) ................. Dr
156 2J~ mi!,·~ XE. ur(:aatoni,1 •••••• Urov,'ll Thrl"ad Co ..... Ralph Robbi11s ...•.• Dr
157 .... do ••.•••••••••••••.•••••••.... do .•...•....•...••.... do ...•...••••••. Dr
15~ •••. clo •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• do ..•••.•••........••• do •••......•.... Dr
l5tl •••• do ..••••••••••••...••......••• do •••••••••••••••..... do .•.••••••••.•. Dr
160 ..•. do ••••••• · ••••••• · •.•••••••••• do ••••••••••••••••.... do ••••..••.•••• · Dr
· 161 .... do ......•..•••••••••••••••.... do ...........•..••.... do .........••••• Dr
162 •••• do ••.••••......•.••••••••••••• do ..•.•.•...........•. do •.••••........ Dr
163 •... do ..•••••••••••••••••••••• Flint ~fflt, Co .•••••.••.... Jo ........•••••• Dr
164 ..•• do .••••••.••••••••••.....•.••• Jo ••••••••••••••....•• do .•••••••...... Dr
165 •••• do ...............•.••••••••.•• do ..•.......••....•••• do ••••.......••• Dr
11J6 1"4 miles N". of Ga.stoni:. ..••.•. C. A. Barkley ••••••••..... do .•.••••••••... Dr
167
168
W9
1;0
1:1
1··>
173
f;astQnia .....•••••••••••••••. Grenton Milb ...•••••• {?) ••••••••••••••••• Dr
••.. do •.••••••••..•.•........• Sunri,e Dairr .•.•••... Ralph Robhi111 ....... Dr
r.antonia .•••..•...•.•....•••• SunriJe Dairy ••....... Ralph Robbins ...... Dr
I mi!eS.or(;;aa1onia •..•..••... Tuliltll, lne.
_Semino«"Plaot. .....••••••••...•........ Dr
I!-! mil~3 ::;. or r..&11toni.. .• .. . . • Ruby Collon Mill..... . .. • •• • • . • ••.• •.• •.. Dr
, •••• Lh1 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• dn ...........•.••..••.••.............. Dr
1 ..... ,1,1 ............................ do........... Dr
" 66
I I<
523
so
120
" 1-10
100
100
180
96
"
60
225
251
130
""
"
178
500
200
130
191
1'5
" 90
114
132
00
69½
61
167
133
265(?)
136
0G
120
'" IM
"''
Diameter
of well
(inehe:s)
5 5/8
5 5/8
5 5/IJ
10-8
Derith of Wattr level
Clll!ing (foet bcknr
(feet) surfact)
" 50
.llO
60 21
5 5/8 •··•···· ····•··••·
5 ;i/8
fl
32
5 5/8 55
5 5/ll ••••••.. '
5 ,'i/8 76 :!6
5 5/8 ..•...•...........
5 5/8
5 5/8
123
"
60
"
l!l.l
3S
18
5 5/8 ········ ·•••······
5 5/8 ········ ··•·······
5 5/8 87 Ml
8
Ii 5/8 ·•···••· ••···•••·•
Ii 5/8 ··•••••• ·•••••····
6 ••••·•·• •·••·•••••
6
6 •••••••• ••••••••••
6 ••••.••. ········--·
Ii 5/8 .•..•••• , 50
Ii 5/8 •••••··· ••••••••••
Ii 5/8 ....••.• H
5 5/8 97 28
6
6
0
"
43
"
"
30
30
Yield
(g.p.m.)
8
' 0
100+
II
20
Ill
22
,.
60
20
32
20
I
18
"
12
20
20
8
102
16
"
" 00
" " ::o
" 12
" II
8
30
20
30
"
21
' 8
Tow hard·
nC!!8 (field
lcsUI)
(p.p.m.)
50
"
JO
__ P ______ _
80
"
115
30
Slope.
Schi!t.
Schist.
Hill.
63H° F. Supplies
to'll'h. Slope.
Schist, Used only
geney. Slope.
Schist. Used only
geney,
Schiat. Drnw.
55
~o water.
milll and
in emer•
io emcr•
Supplies .15 hmll!PS and several
busiul"IIIM.11. lJraw.
Kot in use. Water reported
to be hard. Draw.
Do. Slope.
Schilt, Slope.
Schitt. Water reriorted to lie
corrosive. Draw.
&hist. Draw.
Not llled: not enou~h water,
Schist. Slope.
Schist Slope.
2 other similar well-! at mill
and vill:u:e. Flat.
Yielded 27 gallons a miuute
when drilled. Hill.
Draw.
N'otUICd. Teitedat65g.p.m.
when drilled. Yiel<i de•
er~ to 20 g.p.m. when
aliandoned. mu.
Schiat. Not lll!ed; capped.
Hill.
Schi!t. ~ot used; e-.i.ppe,J,
Draw.
62½° F, Schillt and quartzite.
Draw.
Schiat. Yielded 25 to 30 g.p.m.
when drilled. Draw.
Schist. Hill.
Schist. Ahaudoued lieeause
water l,eeame muddy. Draw
Hill.
(:rirnite, Water 0Ut-£i11ed at 80
feet. Draw.
111½° F. Cranite. Drnw.
Granite. Draw.
Granite: -Well ,t reservoir.
Draw.
Granite. Draw.
Granite. Draw.
Granite. Hill.
Granite. Draw.
""· ""· Suppliea 9 hoOllell. Schitt.
Slope.
Schist. Draw.
Schist. Water obtained at 70
feet. Slope.
Granite. Draw,
Gr&nite. Slope.
62° F. Granite. Draw.
Graaitr. IJraw,
Ciranite. Hill.
Ii
II 1, ;;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
56 GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, .NORTH CAROLINA
REcmmH OF '\Vt:LLS 1:-. GAHTOX CoG'XTY-Continucd
Well ... J,0CATION Ow:nia
174 I},( milea S. of Gutonia. •••••••. Teitilea, Inc.
DatLL&R Type of
··"
°'°"°1a Plant. •••••••••••••••••••••••••• Dr
175 I½ miles S. of Gastonia........ DilCm Milla........... R.lph Robbins...... Dr 178 •.•• do ..•••••••••••••..••••••••.•. do •••.•••....••••••••• do •••••....••••• Dr
177 2 miles S. of Quton~---------· Tei tiles, Inc.
Victory Plant ••••••• ·········-·······;·· Dr
178 2½ miles S. of_Gutonia, ••••••• Tntiles, Inc.
Myera Plant •••••••. lt.lpb Robhi.111 ••.••• Dr
1711 .... do .•........•••••••••••••.•••• dO ···----·-····--...• do ••••••..•••••• Dr·
180 ..•• do •••••••••••••••••••...•.•••• do ••...•.•..••••••...• do .•....••••••.• Dr 181 2¾' miles S. of Gastonia •••••••• Rex-Hanover Milb, Inc.
(Hanover Pl&nt) •••••••• do.............. Dr
182 .••• do ••••••••••.•..•••••.•.•.•••. do ...•.••••••••••• \\'are .•••••••....•• Dr 183 .... do ...........•.•.......•••.... do •••••..•.....••• RoLbina ••....•••••• Dr 184 3½milesS.ofG1L11tonia •••••••. Testik:s, Inc.
Ridge Plant. .••...•.••• do ••••..•••••••. Dr 185 .•.• do ••••••••.•••.•••••.••.•..••• do .....••••••••...•... do ..•••••••..••• Dr
186 2½milesSE.ofGutonia •••... J.A.Hradsha• •••••..•••• do .•....••••••.• Dr 187 3½ milee SE. of G1L11tonia •••..• Robert M. Brandon •••••.. do ••••••.••••••• Dr 188 ...• do .•..••••.•••••••••••••.• H. R. Kendrick ••••••..... do •••••••••..••• Dr
189 GILlltouia ..................••• Fireatonc Milb, Inn. ••••••• do •.•..••••••••. Dr
190 •... do .•...........•..•••••••..... do •••....•••.••••• RoLLiua {?) ••••••••• Dr·
191 .•.. do •••..•....•.....••••••••.... do ••••....•••••••••••. do ....••••••..•• Dr
192 .... do .............••••••••••.•••• do ......••..••••.. Guy Hobbins •••.••• Dr
193 .•.. do ..•.....•.....•...••••••...• do................ • . •.. ...•.. ••••.•••• Dr
191 .... do ..•.....•.........•.•••...•• do .••...•••••••••.•.••..•••••••••••••• Dr 195 .... do .............•••••••....•••• do ... ~ .••••••.•... Roht,ins ••••..•••••• Dr 106 J!,f miles W. of Gastoniaa ..•••. hrkd11.lc Mill, hie .•••••.•• do ....••••..•••• Dr 19i •••• do ••••••••••••••••...•.•••.... do ••••••.•••.••••••••• do .•..•.••••.•.• Dr 198 •... do .....•....•....••••••••. Bloom Mills, Inc .•..••.••...•.••• , ••.•.••••• Dr 199 •••• do •••••••••••.•••••.•..••• Teitilet!. Inc.
• Arlington Plant. ••••••.••.••.••.•••..••• Dr
200 2 miles W.of G1111tonia .•••••••. Threads, Inc .••••••••• Robbins •••••.•••••• Dr
201 ..•. do .••••.••••••••••••....••..•. do •••••••••...• · •• J. S. Hill8011. •••••.. Dr 202 •••. do ..•..........•.••••••.•.•••• do •. · •.••••••••.•• RoU~ns ••••••.••••• Dr
203 .•.• do ••••.••••••••.......••••..•. do ••••••......•••• J. S. llinaon •••....• Dr 204 ••.. do ................•••••....••• do .....••••••.•..•.•.• do •••.•.•.•••••. Dr 205 2¼ miles W, of G11Stonia ....••• Textiles, Inc.
Myrtle Plant •.•...••••••••••..••••••••. Dr 206 I¾ miles SW. of Ga.:,tonia ••.•• Clyde Bradford .•••••. Ralph Rohhina ..•••• Dr 20i •••• do ..•.•......•.•.•••••••.. D. \\·, Dawn ••••••.••..••• do ••••..•••••.•. Dr
208 •... do ....•••••••••••....•.••• 0. L. Rhyne •.•....•••••.. do .••••••..•.••• Dr 209 2½ milell_NW. of Gutonia ..•.. 0. R. Jenkina ••••••.. ~ .••• do •••..•.•••••.. Dr 2IO .... do •••••••••••...•....••••• M. B. Jenkins .....•.••.... do ...•••••....•• Dr 211 •••. do .........•...•••••••.... D. I.. \\'yonl. ••••••...•••• do .......•••••.. Dr 212 .... do .••••••••••..........••• J. Fronelier11:cr ....•••••... do .•••••••....•• Dr 213 3¼ mil<'8 NW. of G11.11tonia ..••. D. G. Hurns ••••.••... \'11.. Mach. Co .••.••. Dr 214 2 milrt1 E. of Bessemer City ...•• R.it.~n Spinniui: Co .••••••......•.•••••..•• Dr
215 •••• do .•••.......•.••••••••...•••• do ......•••••..... Ralph Rohhins .....• Dr
216 ..•• do ••..........••••••••.....••• do ......••••.....••••. do.............. Dr
21i I¼' milf'!I E. of Beasemtr City ... Ideal !-.fachine Shop... Rt,,Jph RoLl,ina...... Dr
Depth
of well
(feet)
122
185
"
1'5
110
103½
180
26i
140
18'
120
" " " 80±
"'
125
145
l07
" (I) ,.,
210
98
160
105
490
76½
4!l0
000-1000
160
" 64½
100
100
110½
77
132
110
271½
130
Diarnett"r Depth )Water level
of well cuing
(ineheii) (feet)
•
li li/8 ••••..•.
li li/8 ····-···
•
(fttl below
1urface)
15
JO
6 6/8 ····-'··· •••..•••• ~
Ii 11(8 ···-···· ·••••••·•·
"6 li/8 ••••..•• ·--·······
"
112
6 6/8 ···-···· •··•·•••··
5 6/8 35 10
5 5/8 ······-· •••·····••
Ii S/8
li 6/8
6 5/8
6
8
6
6
6
5 5/8
5 6/8
'
6
8
8
5 5/8
Ii 5/8
5 5/8
. 5 5/8
5 5/8
6
f,
5 5/8
27
" 27
100
100
44
13
"
.13
10.2
10.6
5.07
80 ...•••...••
38
35
········ " " 1.5± .,
110
" 20
··········
35
··········
50
27
Yield
(g.p.rn.)
" 16
12
• 16
20
30 •
20+
'
8
40
6
H
80
20
18
:13
15
" lO
35
" JO
2
12
15
JO
8
JO
6 ,.
15
50
12
12
Total hard-
nem (6cld
teat.a)
(p.p.m.)
"
"
20
40
" 20
" ············
35
35
30
45
30
35
20
" " 35
"
50
R,au.au
Granik. UM!~ a:H.r. PUDJri.
Hill.
Gr&11i~. Dn.11'.
Do. ··•'-:r
Granit.e. Orip;inaDy yieldl'd 25
,:.p.ro. Flat.
Granite. Well at mill. Flat.
61½° F. Granite. Ori1i:inal1~·
yielded 29 p;.p.m. Dr111r.
Granite. Well in village. Hit!
62H° F. Granite. Welb IS!
182 and 163 suriply water
for plant and village. Anal;-.•
aia or water from •ell IS?
in table. Temperature •ell
182, 64° F.
Granite. Dra11'.
Granite. Dra•.
Granite crops out 60 foet from
well. Hill.
Granite. Draw.
&::hiat. Flat.
Schist. Flat.
Granite. Waler reported soft.
Dra11',
Granite. Well I; not in use.
Draw.
Granite. Well 2; not in use.
Dra.,.
Granite, Well 3. Draw.
Well ~; not iu U.'lt. Crnnite.
Draw.
Granite. Well 5. Draw.
Granite. Well 6.
Granite. Dra11',
Granite. Slope. ;
64!~° F. Granite. Hill.
62½° F. Granite. Hill.
Granite. Nol in °Ulll.'. Draw,
Granitl'. Al,andoned. Draw.
Granite. Not in use. 8lopc.
63"'° F. Granite.
Granite. Draw.
Granite. Slol'll'".
Granite. Slop(•.
Granite. Supplies ' l101JSe$.
Slor,e.
Granite. Hill.
Granite. Hill .
Grani1e. llill.
Slope.
········•·••·········•······
Su1>pli<'21 lar11:r farm. iilo1>t'.
Schist. Old well iu firld, not
U8ed. S101.e.
62)-.-° F. Schist.
wrll J. Dra•.
Comp:1.11)' •1•11
hous~). llill.
Schist. Draw,
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN _THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
RECORDS (n' ,YELLS 1:-; G.\STOS Cou:-;TY-Continued
Well
"·
i.(X:ATION Ow:om DnlLLr:R Type or
well
2IS Bessemer City-······---·-----Algodon Mfg. Co .......... do.............. Dr
219 ____ Jo________________________ Osage Mfg. Co .. ______ ···--·-··-----------Dr
220 l½ miles SE. of Bel!l'lemerCity.. L. A, Wolfe___________ Ralph Robbios •...•• Dr
221 2 mileaSW, of Be9$Cmer City .•• R. L. Letris Dairy •••••.... do .••••.••...... Dr
222 2½milesSW.oflle1111emerCity_ PincGroveGrill .•........ do ______________ Dr
223 1 mile NW.of Kingi, Mountain .. Earle E. Carpenter ..••.... do .•••••.•...... Dr
224 :\fountain View............... Fried• Mfg. Co........ ••••...............• Dug
225 .... do .....•.••• · .....•...•••••••• do ...............•..•••...••••..•••••. Dug
226 .... do .•••.........•.•••...... R. H. Hook ••••••••..• Ralph Robbins...... Dr
22i .•.. do ......•.•..........•..•• Harvey Flume .•.......... do ....•...••••.. Dr
22S !'2 mile NE. of Mountain
View .....•...........•.•.•• Mrs,EureRol.,erts ...•....••..•.••••..••.. Dug
229 2½ miles SE. of Mountain
View •....••••••.......••••• A. L. Dial............ Ralph Robbins...... Dr
230 3 miles S. of Mountain View •... J. A. Stroupe......... ..•.••••••••.....•.. Br
231 4% milea S. of Mountain View .. Wilaon and Brown .....••••............••.. Dr
232 5 miles S. of G11.11tonia ....•••••• T. L. Hovis........... Ralph Robbi~...... Dr
233 5 1/3 miles S. of G111toni1. ••. .. Evan Brandon .•.••..••.•. do,............. Dr
234 6 miles S. of r;11.11tonia.......... C. E. Honeycutt ••....•.•. do.............. Dr
2:15 •••. do .•••••........•.••...... W. L. Hutchison ..•••• Tom York .......... Cr-Dr
z.3ij 7 miles S. of G11~tonia... ... . ... Tom Sparrow......... . ...••..•.• •••• •••.. Dug
:::;~ i U rniles S. of Gastonia •••••••••.•• do................ Ralph Robbins...... Dr
215 4)1 miles SE. of G>1.11tonia ••.••• Carroll Kerr •••.•.....•••. do.............. Dr
239 4~.i miles ::iE. of Gastonia •••... W. S. Torr~nce
Fairview Dairy ••..•.•... do.............. Dr
to .... do .....••...........•••.•• Ga.stonia Airport· ...... U.S. Army •..•...•. Dr
It 5¾ miles SE. of Ga.i,tooia .•.••• Sindy Plain Church ... Tom York •••••••••• Cr-Dr
42 6Y:i mill'~ SE. o( Ga11tonia. ••... D. F. Harrison .•...••. George Stephell!!On •. Cr-Dr
Depth
of well
(feet)
113
150
116
160
165½
100
41
17
IOI
97
87
137½
53
70
108
65
100
00
61
125
90
150
102
90
68
Diametl'r Dt>pth of Water level
of •ell C8.lling (fcetlitlow
(inches) (feet) surface)
-------
5 5/8 '"' "
6 50
5 5/8 62 " 5 5/8 "' 65
5 5/8 ........ ..........
5 5/8 80 50
" H 37 .68
" t7 6.50
5 5/8 ·······-61
5 5/8 " 43
30 0 S0.98
5 5/8 ..••.... ····•••·•·
12 46.22
' 40 5 5/8 ......•• 48.00
5 5/8 ......•• ••····•···
5 5/8 .•••.•••..........
2 40 48
36 . 61 56.25
5 5/8 ......•• ·-········
5 5/8 ......••
5 5/8 ......••
6 78
2
48
21
40
"
Yield
(g.p.m.)
25
"
40
16
20
,I
........
15
25+
50!
........
4-5
' 15
15-20
20
10
20
4-5
'
Tot.al hard•
Ol'Sll (tidd
te:its)
(p.p.m.)
............
············
............
'" 45
55 ............
············ " 20
·········•··
35
20
50
" 20
20
...•........
35
............
20
JO
............
············ ············
ANALYSI-:s OF GROUND WATER FROM GASTON COUNTY,* N. C.
(Numbers at heads or columns correspond to numbers in table of well data)
(parts pe"r million)
9 10
Silicia (SiO:) .••••.•.....•...... 32 20
Iron (Fe) •...••••••..••.•••••.• .23 4.9 .
Calcium (Ca) ••..•.............. .. 3t
Magnesium (Mg) ••••••••••• ~ ••• 3.7 ,.o
Sodium and potassium (NA+KJ .. II 8.4
Carbonate (COi) ••••••••••....•. 0 0
Bicarbonate (HC01) ..•.....••••• 160 12'
Sulfate (S01) ••••..••••••••.•••• 6.7 10
Chloridt1 (Cl) •.....•.....•.••••. 7 .0 2.,
Fluoride (F) ••••••••••••.••••••• .3 .2
Nitrate (NO,) ••••••••••..•••••• .6 .0
Dieaolvcd solidi .•••••••••••••.•• 166 138
Total hardness aa CaCO, ....••••. 125 98
Date of collection •.•••••.••..... 11/20/47 11/20/47
• Analysis madf! by U.S. Oeol0jj;ie1l Survey.
•• Flow1 one--half g.p.m. from hornblende gneiso.
a Fe in aolution .01
II 46 .,
31 27 35
·" 8.6 • 15
M " 10
5.1 5.9 4.L
" 9.3 8.3
0 0 0
107 84 40 .
113 4. t 1.9
2.2 4.5 13
1.0 .o .o
I.I .0 10
200 107 Ill
'" " 43
11/20/-1.i 2/16/-1.8 2/16/-1.8
Spring••
51 53 07 182 (Ga.i,ton
No. A)
36 35 37 3l 23
.08 ·" .09 1.0 .21a
II 9.2 12 8.3 4 .9
6.2-. 4.5 4.7 1.3 2.2
5.2 6.9 6.4 10 5.3
0 0 .0 0. 0.
52 37 71 31 31
3.9 2.9 1.2 1.3 4.3
7.4 8A 1.6 12 1.9
.o .0 .! . t .o
8.6 14 1.6 ,., .2
114 107 IOI 96 "
53 41 ., 26 2t
2/13/48 2/16/48 8/11/45 8/ll/45 5/20/49
57
Rr:!URIUJ
Not """'' water reported to
be too hard. Flat,
Pumped at 35 g.p.m. but will
not maintain thia yield Fht.
Slope.
Schiat. Slope.
Schist. Slope.
Schist. Hill.
Schist. Supplies village. Hill.
Graven. Valley.
Schist. Slope.
Schist. Draw.
Schist. Hill.
Do.
Schist. Supply (ailed during
autumn of 19-1.0 aod 1941.
Hill.
Schist. Hill,
Granite. Hill.
Sehiat. Slope,
Schiat.
Granite .
Schist, Hill.
62° F. Schist. Cm 65 '" i5 feet. llill.
Schist. Slope.
Schist. Draw.
Do.
Hill.
Water reported soft. Hill.
I
I
I MEMO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE: December 23, 1993
TO: File
FRCM:
RE:
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer
North Carolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
Hydrogeology of Gastonia Area
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
NCD 986 175 644
On December 22, 1993 I talked to Mr. Mark Durway (704-868-
3743), the former Hydrogeologist for Gaston County Health
Department, Environmental Health Section from 1991 to 1993, about
the hydrogeology in the vicinity of South Gastonia and specifically
the Davis Park Road site. Mr. Durway stated that in the area of
concern, there is no confining layer between the saprolite
(weathered bedrock) and the bedrock. The majority of the potable
water is obtained from fractures in the bedrock. His conclusion is
supported in three ways. First, this is based on all of the current
literature available on the local geology. Second, it is supported
by field observations of the stratigraphy in the area in the
vicinities of bedrock outcrops and stream bed cuts. Finally, it is
supported by personal geologic experience in the area during his
three years in this area.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
May 11, 1994
File
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer
North Carolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
Groundwater Population Calculations for Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia/ Gaston County, North Carolina
NCD 986 175 644
On May 10, 1994 I calculated the population inside the Target Distance
Limits (TDL's) for the Davis Park Road TCE site. First I located the community
wells supplied by the N.C. Public Water Supply Section on the topographic maps
and delineated those houses associated with them. Several community wells which
do not serve over 30 people are identified on Figure 2. These wells and the
Cedar Oak Park Subdivision population was determined by house counts on Figure
2. Next I delineated the area of Gastonia served by the Gaston Water Supply
System.
Several areas depicted as urban areas on the topographic maps, pink with
no individual houses shown, are located within the TDL 1 s and are not served by
the Gaston Water Supply System. These areas were planimetered and the area (sq.
mi.) was multiplied by the population density (315.3 people/sq. mi.) for South
Gastonia.
TDL AREA (sq.mi.) DENSITY POPULATION
(people/sq. mi. I
0 -¼ 0.0533 315.3 17
¾ -½ 0.0333 315.3 10
½ - 1 0.202 315.3 64
1 -2 0.956 315.3 301
2 -3 0.105 315.3 33
3 -4 0.000 315.3 0
Finally those houses not included in any of the above areas were counted. All
of the house counts were multiplied by the population density (2.64 people/house)
for Gaston County.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ITDL
10 -¼ mile
I¼-½ mile
I½ - 1 mile
11 - 2 miles
12 - 3 miles
13 - 4 miles
II
GROUNDWATER POPULATION
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
COMMUNITY WELLS
Well ID and Name
B-Hedoewood Circle (CO-11)
NA -Moore Community Well (CO-22)
NA -Puritan Communitv Well (CO-4)
I Subtotal
A -Jenkins Communitv Well (CO-3)
3 -Cedar Oak Park S/D
6 -Pennv Park Dr. S/D
9 -Skvland Dr. SID
12 -Valleydale SID
I Subtotal
II
126 -Old Providence SID
128 -Silverstone S/D
Subtotal
15 -Kinq Grant SID
21 -Mountain Village MHP
23 -Brimer Rental Prooertv
25 -Oakley Park #2
33 -Laurel Woods S/D
!Subtotal
1 -Alan Acres
2 -Beverly Acres
11 -Sunset Park SID
13 -Lamar Acres
14 -Park Place
16 -Maolecrest S/D
17 -Hickory Villaqe MHP
19 -Bren=ood MHP
24 -Northwoods MHP
27 -Raby's MHP
29 -South Lane S/D
30 -Suburban MHP
32 -Woodland Acres
34 -Windwood Acres S/D
35 -Raintree SID
39 -Fallscrest II S/D
40 -South Forest S/D
41 -Amv Acres
42 -Castjewood S/D
45 -Shady Rest MHP
47 -Chaoel Acres MHP
48 -Scarrow MHP
50 - D M Rentals
51 -Hickorv Creek S/D
52 -Robinwood Lake
53 -Chaoel Grove Elem. School
!Subtotal
5 -Lakewood S/D
7 -Pines MHP
8 -Robinbrook Place
10 -Suburban Heiohts S/D
18 -Jack-A -Shell MHP
22 -Fairfax SID
31 -Wesley Acres #2
36 -Southamoton SID
37 -South Hills Estate Ill ·
38 -Woodleigh SID
43 -Stonev Oaks S/D
44 -Bethany MHP
46 -Snowshoe MHP
49 -Covinqton MHP
I Subtotal
* These population figures are based on house
counts from Figure 2 multiplied by the density
for Gaston County
Poe. I
42 .
8 .
16 •
66
29
69
34
60
160
352
30
160
190
519
135
40
300
180
1174
417
147
344
159
135
240
160
70
75
84
48
186
128
88
256
240
124
60
135
65
150
81
65
25
100
757
4339
144
210
84
200
80
240
183
140
76
353
36
75
56
260
2137
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GROUNDWATER POPULATION
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
Urban Areas not Supplied by the Gaston Water District
TDL I Area (sg. mi.) I Densitl
o -¼ mile 0.0533 315.3
¼-½mile 0.0333 315.3
½-1 mile 0.202 315.3
1 - 2 miles 0.956 315.3
2 - 3 miles 0.105 315.3
3 -4 miles 0.00 315.3
Density is based on 1990 US Census Data
House Count from Topographic Maps
TDL I Houses I Densitl
O -¼ mile 30 2.64
¼-½mile 20 2.64
½ - 1 mile 17 2.64
1 - 2 miles 249 2.64
2 - 3 miles 544 2.64
3 - 4 miles 462.00 2.64
Density 1s based on 1990 US Census Data
Total Groundwater Population
TDL House Count Urban Areas
0-¼ mile 79 17
¼-½ mile 53 10
½-1 mile 45 64
1 - 2 miles 657 301
2 - 3 miles 1436 33
3 -4 miles 1220 0
I Poeulation I
17
10
64
301
33
0
I Poeulation I
79
53
45
657
1436
1220
Comm. Wells Total POD.
66 162
352 415
190 299
1174 2132
4339 5808
2137 3357
-...... -
(
('
G
(;
C
(
(
(,
;
C
C
(
(
- - ----~
F'MMGC-ID
ACTIVE ~iY~HEM~;
·~ -' ' .,--. I I -
GF-:lD LAl JTUI!E: 3M.OOO ~{~_,,1-/yJ, L□NGIT\.mE · N!i0730 / 08L1."'(3{)
F~f:~j. H:R\;CJN SOURCE SOURCE
I I --I J .... -,
F'WS ID SYSTEM NAME
136i02 ALAN ACRES
TYPE: F'DF"ULATIDN WORK F·HONE SOURCE NAME IYF·E ,~VAIL LATITUDE LCJNGITUDE
C
1 'J: .I.~ 1 ASI i':~ FT'.T. ,-".f;I{
2 136108 BEVERLY ACRES
3 136113 CEDAR OAK S/D
C
C
"'-.,s-
'I s
l
7
~ s,-:e:i:.: ,.."F'!;l':tlS
Ciu-1IG 61,F<f!ENS ~ E.1i..:i.:l1(J~:; 11611T.ER'.'t
H!\LEtJO.JD ·m·tiTER~"
~-El-i'6E'.JO':P € 'D ': ~-E':.5E\.ie0B~ I ,ercES s:,
LDl1t:WG6£ ~t :C: ,_J o .J
E55Et400:B 1"1SRES ·03
Fi•r:~LcieR·csT ·: '.:','D
FALi.:GbREGT I G/D
i,,JTR :J I S"T?'
LIT,..I ::_-l'S":D1
i3!!i31 T1°1ELEr.t..:,1e ~~!:::-if'; I5i3l1
J:2ui3::5 1-□ ff,1,I]i I ILL 15ii.
FotlT.".It! 'o'ILL~.sc
FlJ'ITAI~I l'l'_l::_O,EE
13:1.G? IT_'_'.'l'CDE 1'.8F,CD -~,•:
'136154 FOXFIRE S/D
136155 LAKEWOOD S/D
-~6LO 11· I • u ..el ,.
M□Ui r•· 0 It!PF:OO1: S>D
1361?4 PENNY F·ARK DR WTI::; SYS
13617(:, F·INES MHF'
PINES MHF'
i3.H9: s-.[.
"" C"
-6-
c c-
-B-e-
-e-
-6-
" t
--c
."-
c
C
~
--e-
c
C
--C.-cg11·:·:-r.·: pc··cs .....;...
,,¥ 136185 .ROBINBROOK F·LACE C 'f i36i89 Sl<YLAND DR C
...c
:1.36195 STARRLAND COMMUNITY SUF'F"L Y C
/O 136197 SUBURBAN HEIGHTS S/D C
// 136198 SUNSET F"ARI< S/D C
.:::. ..... ci:::·, .. ,rJ: c.'B ------------6:
/Li3c,199 VALLEYDt,LE sun COMM SUF'F"LY C ..,,,L., F/1'.◊Jl.r sur sc:: ·:=u:·FtY e--
1.362O4 YORKWOOD .. S/D: C"'
Yard,WOGF, S,'!) -&
136~.'.05 FORESTBROOK S/D C
1"3 j_362O6 LAHAF: ACRES C
b Ii 1:,.--_ i" .. :l'\E.J ·------e---
/f 136207 PhRI< Pl.ACE C
IS 1362ii I< lNGS GF~ANT S/D C
/6 13t~220 MAF"LECRES"I S/D C
1362:21 MARIA PARK S/D C t·,:··,J_:, r.,:--: ~1/D ------P,---
4i 7 704B65'?..!,92 WELL ,:,1
-□-1w 1.2 __ 1·_•.3 ,,,..,__L
i47 70486 7953;4 WELL ,a
102 WELL
.... ,. -,)qd6-:-?r:=1 ~,"ELLS ic,-
i ·; 1. 78 1067953 i tsi.ELLS :ct,~~ ... ,:.□ :...:_;:□652789 ~JEL.L
i6C -;·_, 19,_,::--,-,c:o l:l:::L·. :.t
~.6' 81JG222'"'~('.., '•F.:!.L
:.~,~: 7: 102 :z.:[;19 :;.;JEI_L8
uUO ·; 0 18.c.4.,6", 9 :t.:Lt .. ~
369 7918i11'.:l:tr9 '•7.L' .. +;
t=c i 7C 182 ,2c-? t:ELLG ·oo ..,,.,. q(;;l;.120--:-,9 , •i::u, .. s
-□-7G •□6 ;9r·--• 1 F.:,:;;TF·.::c 5
•1 H,; , : .e= 12:a·s ~-ELi....G
1 4C 7: 10212279 ':EL.LG
11<' 7gqr'2122""'9 11[1 .. LS
23: 7: '1821:::~-,9 !.'EL'_
C,6 7w 10652.'1 39 LJtl i .. i
40 WELL C:,j
:!.44 8002225607 WELL :U:
..s., ,·s·cc·.'S ..
±13(3 1 3 10 •• 1?..G"i"9 iJl:Ll.:3
34 WELL
210 l,JELL
~ 61·1.-:;· .• 'J -~11 ·-r
-,')A -, -, ,opr> A<">r.•;r, , ''.:f b ..o.rJ
''J)9 ··c .,v, ~··,o.., ... • ·~:iJ_ -:: 1
84 704865FJ927 WELL
60 7048655448 l.JELL ¢1
160 7047341.539 WELL ,:Ci
200 7045257'?90 WELL
:344 7(.\48242879 WEU. ':0" 701'1..,..,..,£..,'2 r:::,111 r, TG'"t ''F
160 WEI_LS
l:'o7 ~
23•1 WELL ,::,j
. .2-34-We±:------;a2
400 7045257990 WELL
i 59 7048t,79534 WELLS
.l:J1 .. , O k,~,'1 >.J.J'i tdt:!:t.., __ ;3
l.35 70•.8679:'L'.4 WELL
319 70452~57990 WELL
240 7048242879 tJEl . .L
84 70486418<:!4 WELLS c '. -·· ,c·c H:,.-, :J_u_.s
G .;;...
G
G
"tr ,,_
" &
fr-
--6--.,-
-"-s-
G---. _,,,_
-t-
-€--
G
G
~
i,-
G
G
;c-
t-
--&-
G
G
~
G
G
G
...p.
G ,,_
G
,e-
G
G
t,-
G
G
G
G
E----
F'
-"-
F'
F' ,.
·"+-
+
f'-p-
f"
-r--_,,_
-P-
.P-
-f'
F'
r-· ,.
F'
p
-e-
F'
,.
p ,-
p
F'
F'
p
35i5i5
~)
351240
351110
~
:s:Jtt ,:J
.iCi723
:m170;
~
~ d.,,.17t"'
"!C191""
.!'.: .:.1::.. ..
3511±6
8:!.1500
~
811115
81.1.230
~;
61064,J
010012
01001::
OH_-,rs
~
BTI7IB
811710 au.:. g
351716 Ci1Si6
.z~-➔•~?~·h,~. --~a~,➔!-~ zr1ao? c11cnz
35.:.7~ •. 6
351330
351306
7':'1@6 ....
351215
~-o
35:tiii
:,i.:;_1:~-;
01.t220. I-., UP-.~•• 41">'
810<;'36
R '.t -: .. S'
~JV/l't.O'-J{,
81.1210
? : M •::o
25£155 816(19
351200 BUOOO : ·
351350 81i310Ct..o~t::
3£i.~ .-G.1' J
351428 01.1321 /v l/t,.81ill At?et
351057 811258
351500 811500
~ ~
351340 811321
3513\S 8ii3~1
351245 s11220111 (l(J,..-Alt~ ,a~s~,~-:.~•~1,e::.--~e~,~. ,~2e>t1 o
351310 811220 I(/ A
351200 81.1.325
351200
351.500
:551455
3514i•i
315.'. q!_ 1
<..-.1 •. L~,:.::;
811:!00
Bi.t.300
811515
811312 IU/l
- - - - -- -- -- --- -- - - - -
( F'AGE
PMMGRID STA"fE i'-!.C. f-•UDLIC WATEF..: SLJF'F·LY SYSTEM 04/l.5/94
r-icn:v,;: SYSTEMS
GF~_[l) LATITUDE:· 3'.'.',:1.000 / ;~~"i1.730, LDNt";].TlJDE: Oal.0730 / OBJ.l.730
RES. F"EF:.:SON SOURCE SOUF~CE
PWS ID SYSTEM NAME TYF'E r-·OPULATION wo1:;:K f'HONE SOURCE NAME TYPE AVAIL. LATITUDE LONGITUDE
'
(1
(
(
. (i
(
/7 ,\.36225 HlCKOF~Y VILLAGE MHP C
HlCl,6"( t' .ILb01GE 111-JF' .f.,---.
/9 136229 .JACK-A-SHELL MHF' C
-: }/,,. 136235 BRENTWOOD MHF' C
: .. )20~_136~36 BILTMDl:.:E ESTATES S/D C
... ,4" 2]·'136241 MOUNTAIN VILLAGE MHF' C -:_..,..ii_ 136242 FAIRFAX S/D C
:-.-~ '136247 .. BRI~ER (LEWIS) RENTAL PROPERTY C
F8J'. F'.JI! 9, J
L~ 136266 NORTHWOODS MHP
2~ 136267 OAKLEY. F'ARK C:,2
01-il<L.:: 1 f' 1-1F\K :::2.
iJilL JI
:J..(, 136268 OLD PROVIDENCE S/D
1.l 136271 RABY'S MHF·
R.0191.'' C ►H 1--·
fo\E '1C MHF'
;l_S·.136279 SILVEF:STONE S/D
i9 136280 SOUTH ~ANE SUBDIVISION
"3J l 36283 SUBURBAN HI-IF'
£iUE LRF "JI !'! I!"
31: 136287 WESLEY ACRES ~•2
32.. 136289 WOODLAND ACRES
i::;627-2 F
1a,s29 ~. rc:r EST · 1-:r-n:
136295 61\TE..:: •. J I
,-c:,o~ ~-r~:·.,.,,, 11,.,..-::--·1:,·-.,.,,,._
3J 136304 ·LAUREL WOODS S/D
~~136312 WINDWOOD ACRES S/D
136:L_ t::! tIC:1 :sp:;;-·t1F
3S° 136324 F~AINTFs!C:E S/I>
r·11·--:--~c -:<n
l<Ptlifr,i:L~ -~-I,
ir,·1 :fifiTcEC _; l)
1362:-1,130:g·•·Ls F.'H
136329 PINEVIEW S/1)
~6 136334 SOUTHAMF'TON !~/D
,J::J,.1·;,1.'ii .. TG". C:,T
37 136335 SOUTH HILL ESTATE III
J'g 136336 WODDLEIGH S/D
wem,~Cllll f S,.;
W.JGt..E:,G: I 3/D
C
C
-€---'c
C
~
C
C
C
-B-
c
C
C
C
C
C
C
&-
C
~
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
.c
C
C
-e-·
--e-
t<':>O
----4-,!,.0
80
70
71
135
240
40
(t'
C,i6
WELL ,:-1
'·1:•_1 ...... -,
70-\BC,83313 WEl:.L ,:Ci
70486 7777'3 WELL
7045960655 WELL C::•j
704865FJ59:':i WELL ::Ci
7048242879 WELL
70-'i8b43909 \,JELL
.... ··:i;;i13g:...., .. 1;::1..1_
76 l8~. lS.,ff?9 !;,;!El_l
. 'i':'"'~ -Z(U8('~i!78"' I ~:'...L 'l:3
·-zcr~ 7'.'. 10C':i2787 •.:ELI_ ?.i.
75 70-i-8664023 WELL ,:-1
300 7047341539 WELL ?2
38 3 -·c n:-:;. 1!33? lJELL ·"l<i
30 704824287'? WELL
84 7048660455 WELL· o~ 7C"\J({0'1"""" TICTI
01 ·•o 18St,O 1:::.: \ l[:LL.
160 7048242879 WELL
48 8002225607 WELL C:i
i8f.,
~
WELL t~i
183 70.'\8679534 WELL
128 7045274409 WELL ., . ~:--:r;: '"'?•-:--: 1 ''':' .L
-'--'"·' e:JCL.
+<~------"'"-'-
2-:" -:-: ·.:c-:-.,or--:-bdE:_L
180 WELL
88 7048242879 WELL
52 7: 19.: 1,.: \9 '..'EL:...
251~ 7048242B?r; l.JELL. 1, ~, 4, 5
256 1 _ ,□~-'.!0'"'9 I I[!_' j ~), 1, 5
5i 704B640l4i 1,JELL ..._,,
l.40 704B2•12FJ79 WEU .. ·:•:~
1-:c '701 ... ,.a, J' 1.•1.::: .. '
76 70482-l2879 WELL
:353 8002225607 I.JELL. ,:,1
:.J_:;,;_.:_~_5...,.,; W.::L~
_ . .;.~ c· ··::;-_-_s~-~1..1. .... ,::.:::;
·.,5
G F'
.......c.;__ _p..
G F'
G p
G F'
G :-• F·
G p
G F'
-6--P-u----f""-
&-p.
-&-+
-& ; -P--
-G --""
G F'
G p
-&-P--
G F'
G P
~ j.:,_
i;-. P-
G F'
G F'
G F·
~ --f.'--
G F·
G I''
G p
G F'
G P
G F'
G F'
E---?-
-<i f'
G F'
6--T'--
G F'
G ~-·
G F·
G P
G F'
E--P--
G F·
G F'
c; I''
G r:·
1: f·
tr--F-
--ft,-------fl--
35i4.l8 :m_ 110
351130
35i530
351300
351450
351200
351300
&Fft?O
· _35.:.H.e
3§'S)f?
3..:.:.±.:.6
~
~
351600
351310
35.:.3i')
3514j5
351230
351415
351312
351430
2 ..... 116?
35U30
35i5i5
~
~
3J1 H)_
3C:e!G:
351445
:~:"-±DJ
3E.1 C!G!.
351411
35±231
35.U.31~
~
~ -3L.i3.'."i
7'~i IT!
351315
351300
:~
3~.'i:t40C,
351.30l 3s_:3e _
Ol.1530
El.l 1:530
El:'l.1455
811415
8l.OS'01
_81.1450
911040
811130
91 ( . 1 J
LUG .6
Pl n ·. l!.,O
□.:.O?i~
~
~
811500
811500
DHSSS
!:li1405
8il300
nus::
Oi.1.405
811056
811530
a.U.530,
81.!U.0·
8ll530
b~. _;_.:; : :
GU.C2:?
t.,l0b50
CLCJ:.:i
8t1500
P.'...8ll'.:5
l:I. . 4
81.1616
f'.:9_-2.:)
8ii330
~
~
~
~
c.:1-:-at -
B11210 I U A
810946
~
Bl0'?53
810945
axe: ,s
- --
(:
r
(
C
-- --- - ---- -- ---
1--''AGE 3
F·MM(;f~ Tti ::;T .'>Ti:': r~. C. F·UI~L JC Wt1TEl's: SlJf·•t--·L Y ::;YSH~M 04/ .t~:/r;4
ACTJVE SYSTEM!:i
Gf~.!:D L.AIIlUDE: 35Jeov / 351.730, LONGITUDE: OEB.0730 / 0f:3.if730
r,Es. F'EF.'.SON SOURCE SOURcr,:
nr-'E POPUI.J,T t.W~ wom< F'HONE SCJUF~CE NAME J'Y!"lC: AVAIL. LATITUDE L.ONG ITtJDI::
1'l 136337 F,"iLLSCf~EST II S/D
PnLL-'ff CG-: II C: 'D
G
l/t 136338 SUU'JH FOREST 8/D C
~·4'1 136::nr; AMY ACRES C
'll 136:;45 CASTLEWOOD S/D C
WELLS
'l:Uo.'~
WELL''
WELL
WELi_
WEI. L
¢2
Hj
G
~
G
G
G ..,_
35 l. :!06 81 1. 200
--f'---~:~;5~i~:~.~b~6--~C"i .t'..'..'C)()
351210 8i1~00
351145 Bi11.45
351436 81151.6·
;551 136 U~ .. tii6
-
C "1':.:TLD088E S,'E t
l!': 136352 OLDE LAMP F·LACE C
240 7048242879
-~ 1Q -,(' 1T1 '12'~ .. ,~
i24 7048242879
60 79'48640141
135 7048652789
l3E 7G10652709
141 7045257990
36 704867"74t,9
WELL G
G
G
p
P.
p
-¥-
p
p
fC•
p
p
p
p
p
p
F
p
p
p ,.
p
p
p
351600 811400 I UA
~3 136:;:56 STONEY OAKS SUBDIVISION C 'I:-' 136:~60 BETHANY MHF' C
.l-'"L. (:;,Jbi,lllt I t.i...: ll!':S"l J.Sli...: C
106371 CF.O.;J:'GF 1=i-uGr..: 1H T' C
'·LS"" 136373 SHADY. REST MH COMMUNITY C
,.4.:,3,4 1,olCll,Alli 10,L C
% 136379 sr~□WSHOE MHF' C
1./7 i363BO CI-IAF'EL ACRES MHF' C
Ci i ".F'=L ACF:-~ u11~ C
4S 136381 Sf''ARF:OW MHP C Lfi 13638~ COVINGTON MHr' C
COVINGTON MHF' C
COVINGTON MHP C
-5? 136383 D M 1,!ENTALS C
st 136:.m6 1-1.TCl<ORY CF~EEK S/!) C
1-r•:;w,;: 1:-LT:e :iCCET.::: S,'E C
i36~G6 t:l!ICJ•: r-~·ECE''.'TEF<Ir-11 GIIURCH N--
j36100 ROEil!1.JOOB Et1FTIST G.ldRCI-I 1't-
136E:: SOUTli"W'TQ'I F:"GQUET FLUD -H--
~ i 1:;i:6429 ROBINWOOD LAKE N
136 n.1. 11ILL" r:·Jw r·E~H r!--
136 1;:,,-:_ -JA,W I I u~ .... ~, 1.+il" e, tt:tReH rt-
136466 t~:,51dll liU!l:CIF/,L .\Ii,F'ORT H-
S) 136534 CHAPEL Gf~OVE ELEM SCHOOL F·
1:,fo:i '18 s~,GTG I ~,1-1·1 3Lil801_ f-'
136541 11·,1:r.: G'G '.'":E'.:"TtL'F:"NT H----
1365 t, 1:Et..1 l□rE ELl:1, 3CI IOOL F----
136549 T ! !~'2 t"tlT" DUT ~
1365-.,, ...;c.J .. ~~IL c1ni:::r--·r ... s-::c F·
136558 C!l'FEL GRQ'IE f:'iP~IST G'IL:,-:S'I +
1.36~}60 P.◊>'s It')! or-t.Hl::=Plbl> --+!--
fi_' .'S Il/11 Gl •,:IEF,IGi, ---H-
13656L !Hh:IE 29 Dnr;c n~ -+t-
L ±/\'Ir-no BF<IVE IN -l+-
13'-.,.("" ('1Cr·rsr11 FQD:R HAl-";;T -1'-r
136563 FTR-.,1 .... um¥ u;nn.:.., e,, u.11,rs +i
136564 Fe.-,, .-,.:.:;a F.L.:.1,. ,u, .. ii _T -:-t-
1365<",5 L: ur£L \ •on: i:· A r·TTC ... n "_if'• :'11 -N-
136566 c.~c:oti MOC''.:'!; •.anc:r ":·1..,.,'?' . .;.:.
136570 1, ... c,_.1 ... w 1.e1u,:,...: rt"
136571 . :as:= iT •~Ff".' 1\QTEI. H-
136574 I ,..../>l:'.""'::'F:•l T t'"::" bl 1'":"'_L -!-+-
'
75 704860331.3
2s 7e,;7z92-oc
~.5 ?i;l 17391612
WELL
t.JELL
;JELL
\!ELL
<1
,:,1
·./ WELL ::,1
Ii
56
1.50
'.53
'it .fJ= 11£679 "l,,JEI_L Ii .1.
70462?2532 WELL :a
704B655:'i03 WELL ,::1
--;--qp:.-':'""01'. ''P 1
81 7048640690 WELL
260
260
260
65
2::.'i
200
JOO
WELL
WELL
WELL
70462r/5321 WELL ¢.1.
7040664~}~)3
7042634243
76 10617,'..Cli
7GrnC'70£0i
WELL a: 1
WELL ::::1
1.JELL
WELL
i00 704f-36540~)8 WELL
_2:; ,e :□6 .o..:;;·6 :-;.::LL
~--kJ ·;.: 186 l 1.:..._6 bdl:LL
2S 73 1066,L TZ WEL.l.
757 7048666j_()0 WELL
l.G? 7'? 186'.:9E l' IJ':1..L
1"0 7P10S7i'..°":l1 •.ICLL
SG 7?1"!K'lr.-<'-•1·11FI I.
~0G 70 qg S 16.:.:.> q !;JELL
SJG 7;; iOCi s_;51 ~ELL
:,0,_; --; e wu·, o.:..~.1 td;::LL
• Jii 70 1:0,:.::;ac ,3 WELL ~.eo TV 186S6S ,:, ,lxELf ..
71,1...'£~11;:1 ~.__LL
s::· 7: 10 '..~):)_\_ 17 I "::LL
;_s ?e Iss:-s::::1 i:it...L .... ::-j
.IC .( 1Qe.•·. ','Q •·~_]_'_
.30 -,31 □611:-:'7 JC:LL
,.O~, ·;(i-,8,J·; k, •. ,1 .,,EL,_
: __ -; G 1~,.:. ,1 .. :k;:, ,..;c_.._
·-:16:--91 ,!EU-:-
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
---5-
-c--
4--
G ,,,___
·E-u-
G.
G
;;-
~
-ti-
ti--
S-e-
-;;---"-
-5-
f,--
,tc
6-
-r-
P-,.
-,.--
l"-r-
p
f'
I"-
-!"-,._
-,-
-+'-
-+--
"'--p.
F"--
35114=• 811545~·--:
:.~5i200 811000-·
.s.,n ,eJo t11. so
3,.,~JJ()
351210
J,s±31 b
351115
351214
3:5·-_L,
351200
351137
351137
351144
351500
351206
~
35.:.115
:...:s .. 14~1
3E!.115
3'~,1.2...,8
351145
3!:.:.230
_'!":'i.':9()
~
Z ... '.'.,E?'9
~
31::_~qg
3~-:.:.615
351615
35.L6±,:;
3'.:.i ;i.,,.
!'""' te'()()
35:l.SC2
3 ..... .,.◊0
35±563
3~,.:.5~--
..:.11_,_o
811510·
c.:.eu 10
8i1.500
Bi14:'!S,
3L .:~c
Bi t:C:,00 · ·
OU iii
B11052
81.10:52
811510
811427
£'' :r:·:6
8iCOl5
b.dtuo
O:'..!G!_lO
O:! .1.000
6 ... 0u4J
8!.0015
01±6ci<)
81.l.500
~f
'~".. j • __ (_)G
~-
~-~-'5"9 = '.-:H'.:-":'.')
e=,.:.i.6 '.5
E'ii.,330
O.IJ.50-0
~o
C_'l.1--,?0
C ~ i500
Ci'Cli5
··,a .. L,., )0
-- -
('
(
(:
c-
0
- - --- --- -- -
CfGD U':JTITl.H)1;::
F"WS ID SYSTEM NAME
i36600 ~-p-•QIIJOP1CY flr'll 'TT~'T r'lll IN~I I
136603' TITllti! GI :01"EL H'TEFTO•! GI :..ir.c: I
136613 CElffER £1.FTIST EIJU.-:C,I
136621 F .1.96, .I I , 1RF Cl IURCI I
·136622"Llltt.JdBE FI311 FR,·
136623 6RED1 V"lLLEV 60LF c;_ur
136625 Gt,STOIIIP. ••rn"r □ST 933·~
136627 C11HF ROTftff.' CIR'.... GCCJUT G'Jlr
13S632 _J[B! ~ fb"'bTICG GQAF .
136645 n1n:rGTATr;;; £"" FUO", t,j(''"'l'E"f
136668 G01GTIO.'!t1 L0t!E!-ILL
136676 t IIDbJd, ftHf TI3 1 e, 1una I
136681 li•ETf 1e~1y T"'F'TJGT GI I! tV'I I
136687 FELLOI ,,..I tJF· 1191..It!':G~ GI! _01-bG')
:1.36693 F:ID5E r 0 r·TI'~T GllUVi~'I
136696 s_1J..:,c, .• Jld•E l.H
136700 ,dfc"bfobl) CilbRCII 61 1;on
136701 Z.T.Oi, r WH3T EflUCC!f
136715 l-1 o PESS ELEI! ~ .... IJDLlL
136724,l:,1\0Sl,U::.:Gfl r:,,-Ji·T;_:~T CilUl',Cil
136727 Gt.F!SD•" F1DfJRI 'L [ ·rrr-:-·,-.
fYF'C
"-
1+-
H-
#-"
-,.;-
N-
;+--
---;.,
N
-14-
#-
'cit-,_,_
l'I
---+:-
#-
~,~~RC er.euc Ahl-N
136745""1\t.R,.,iiTJi.01 rerTIGT GI! !+:--
136748 lff FISG."11 f!O,FTIGT GI' l+--
i.36,751. ,i Etlil5RCG:,TIO/ML or-c:JE. IO'o l;:iIT ,I
136759 .Ru!: I!lt<.139!3 !1AR!CET --H
136762 SUJL 11,.f<t.6,-( ·1, 1,.IEi\,;, ,..:.L.::: I,
136764 G usrmn· r·ctrr~so~p,:_ l'OLH'EC-N
136768 Tt,Dc:r-1:ecu: E··.rr:::T ------N-
136771 TF,IiHT',' e,nt: z:Bi: -ti
136772 llHIOr! r:p ''(71_ 1-rr-:: PE,..'T ...+--
t36B02 QlJOI_ ·:r.' MCT"I r·r-on, ,,-,]'~~ INC -¥-
STA;E r,]. C. )-·ur:L :~l: l,.'t,Ti:::1;· \3ur-·ic.·L.Y ~-y~-;·r !.'::,~i
~,C"!" .::•JE S'f'STEhS
:J31 730, L:J/~GITLJDE:: 0Bj c-✓30 / 081.1730
f;:ES. F'Er-sSON
'OF'Ult'iT~.ON W('lfi:I( !-'"!-/ONE sour,cE NAME
----·--·----·---·--
:l '' ?·: q•v·-., <'t'""';,_i. ''C::U ...
'..AG -·0 r::: 1'..!99,,s 'IC'_I_
-:::G~ -•~ ~H~' 1 A .L2i I IE' •-
t5G '"C(''065761l. 1 • .'ELl-
12: -:-1□6C61i lJEl_i_
l.('C 7C ,-•:,:•?7601 '<E1 L
::e; i':1861732t 'IE'...!..
1 ,., • .,. -·c ~1:3!'. q3--·•~s I !ELL
2~--7C'4f,.,9">"J6 lffTI T'"-?""·An3-2:;1·-. , 1c1_•_
'..:L--,3 W663S36 WELL
~es 72 ?8675:11 WELL
1""Q -1◊?"'L"'.:'i6•.,. lffCI 1
c!G ~909:1(113 l'EL.L.
1GD -e;8176E9i WELL
-,--:·0;1c,1? ••cu_
lw 701067:7?6 WELi_
4'.l~-...,,: •?. '.-z•-3·3 '_11-•_1_
':i:it~ -, .· ,d,.>< . .i,,.yO-t:11::LL
_-6-,' _ ,3c~,7'...,, _ UELL
.' .. -•:; 2_ ,-.. i::u ...
tEl() "/048640196 WELL
'oc ...,'., ~ ( -:'"'0"."::J <. '":LL
7:: ;9,; 17 \Ci '.'ELL
'i'C ;-,; ,u_·,75 .36 .:iE._:...
I:: 30(_,7:r:--i;
i,;;: I: ··1_:s, --5 · rl_i_
U'.: 7:·.fJ...19:'..1l. !'Fl· ..
2s: , : : ,-•·:-"·1 c:s? . .EL_
tJO , :, l06.:.L,5G .JI:~._
3:: 7 ... "]6:s?C: i t ·.J::LL :::c , c .s.o:-·7'~,n !JF' 1
-- --
SOURCE SOU!'-'.CE
TYPE AVAIL.
~ -+-
tr"" ·P-
-&--P-
&----p-
-6-p.
6-P--
--&--f"-
--6-P-
-----.... ,.._ P-
-&-.,._
-&---p
-"-p.
-f,-.._
-&--f"-
{;-P--
-6-....p.
~ F:--
f.i--r--
--;,--p-
·fi--p-----
G P
-f:--..;::,-.
,a-P-
-;;
---f:i---P--
6--P--
(;..... P--
-f,---:--
-fr--:-
-&--+-,,_ p--
LATITUDE LONGITUDE
Z[i,:,GG
35L3 5
35i6C9
35 lSGO :.misc:
3""1509
3Si6iC
:?'':.Vii~·-
~i
::S5i6i5
::---l..2 '5
3, ... _,,6
3Si315
3510-.;c
3'•"' ;!Ac,'
:~
~uh10O
3~
3::1.:'!3:::
3L-2.o3
~35:31!.J
3.,:_;,:,:::
35;,1. ·,:.,
3....,,.6._;;J
Gi.9130
G Li6i"i
0!('730
Oi.131.:i
GH!:599
GH6 l5
0113 ·5
~~11:i,,::;
C-l.L,:..::;
GiiOCO
ou:::30
0±1.1.'.5
C.l.ii.lG
E.1 .. t •• :Jb
Gli!...t5
CJ..t::35
,...11---.00
._,J.i, ..,o
e~:::a L~
GU.5~()
·:•<_'l_ •. '30
c: .. ,.-.-30
:.:.±500 o.:.oc 1,:;
&~
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·:~-.:C•<·.n:"t1e1·.l ln ,_(::i:n'..;:ru.:
:,H;u;:Ji,::-. ;;,;:d S·.:!li:,tic" _;\~'. r;i1:i:-.t;-:,::nr:
n~TL".,..;.i_: (.~:--,;·;;;_:, CG~:;cs
CENSUS '90
• -------=--
1990 Census of
Population and Housing----
Summary Population and
Housing Characteristics
North Carolina
I
I
.I
\ ll
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;I ' .
Tobie 5. Household, Family, and Group Quarters Characteristics: 1990-Con.
State
County
County Subdivision
Place
forsylh County----•·-----------------
Abbot!\ Creel township ••••••••••••••• , /ligh Pain: city (pl.) ________________ 1 ~erner1.-ille town (pt.) ________ _
Sedge Garden COP (pt.) _____________ :
Bflew1 Creel 1own1hip ______________ _
Bethonio township ••••••••• ~u,ol Holl town __________________ _
51onleyvillr COP lpt.) ••••••••••••••. Bro~dboy rowrnhip _____________ _
Srdge GorJ~n COP ipt.) ____________ _
Clemmow,ille rnwnship •--------------Clemmons village (pt.) _____________ _
Kernersville 1ownship ________________ _
)'.ernersv,11~ town (pl.] ________ • ___ •.
Stdge Gorden CDP (pt.) ________ _
Lewiwille township ________________ _
Clemmons villoge (pl.) _____________ _
Lewisville COP ___________________ _
Middle for~ iown~h:p _______________ _
Stonleyville CDP (pl.]. _____________ _
V/ol,erto"n town [pt.) ____________ _
W1nslon-Solem city (pt.) ___________ _
Old Richmond township ______________ _
King city (pt.)--------------------Old Town township _________________ _
Stanle1-vi!le CDP (pl.) _________ • ____ .
\'{,mton-Soiem ciiy (pl.) ___________ _
Solem (hopel township ______________ _
11/oll.erto"n town (pt.) ____________ _ South for, 1ownshi~ ________________ _
V/ins:on-Solem cirf lpt.) ___________ _
0;:~~~~nl~:~~~i~p-: ::: : :: :: :: :: • - -" - -
\'l<n1ton-So'em ci:y (pl.)----------•-
~ron~lin Coun1y ___________ _. _________ _
Town1hip l. Ounn _____________ _ Bunn town ________________ _
Towr.s~;p 2, !forris _____________ _
Township 3. Youngsville ________ _ Youngsville 1own _________________ _
lownship 4, Franklinton ______________ _
fron,finlon 1own _________________ _
[ownship 5, Hayesville _____ ., _______ _
Towmhip 6. Sandy Creel ____________ _ Towmhip 7. Gold Mine ______________ _
Cenu,-,,ille rown. __________ • ______ _
Townsh;p S. Cedar RNk _____________ _
Towns~.iD '1. (ypres1 Creel ___________ _
Town1hir 10. Louisbur7 ______________ _
lo~,~~ur~ :own ______ -·----------
Go11on Ccc•n~, ____________ . __________ _
U,err,~·,11~ tc·., m;iiio _________________ _
(h?rr,-.il;~ ciry __________ _
0fll1iew town __________ _
Cro...,~ers ,\loun1oi~ iownship _____ • _ Bess<mrr City c:iy _____________ _
GJs:oni.i ci:y (p:.l. ...
King1 Mountain ciry (pl.) ___ _
Oollos 1ownsh;p _ _ _. _ 0oll<1S lown _________________ _
Gos:,,nio city (pt) ______ _
High Shool1 ciiy _________________ _
Rcr.k• lo"n (p:.) _________________ _
S1anln lo»n (pl,) _____________ , __ _
Gos Ionic 10,...nshjp _______ • __________ :
Go1:,ini,1 city (pl.). _______________ _
Lowtll cit, (pl.) ______________ _
~o:il,, tO\<>~ (p!.) ____ ......... _" Sc.,:~ ~-os:onio GJP ______________ ..
Sp~C.(N ,',IOl'rllOiri town (r;t': ---- - - - .
~w"bt~d ,OYl.~Sh.~ . __ . Mc,,11t H,,1:,• ci!\' ;p:,) _____ _
S~ec.:,•r .'.\cunl~;n :own (pl.I.
Slcnh· IOM, (pt,) -----------~cu:h P,,in1 10~,n1h>p _____ _
B,•l;,•,,n: ,ir·1 _______ _
(ron><'flon IO»n _____ _
Go11,,nia city (1>1.l. ••• lo"ell ci~, [p1_)_ _________________ _
Mc,ld<nv,lle MHn ·----------
Mounl Holl·,-c,:y (~I.]•·------------
Gnl~sC01u,r,-___ _
r;ot,)svill,, IQwn1liir ____ . ___ _
Goiesv,lle 1own __________________ _
Moll t~wmh,p --------------------· l101lett lvwnship ___________________ _
Holly Gro,t :o,.,nship. _______________ _
l!unlers ,\',,II townshi:, ------------····
l.lin1011,,,1:e township-------·--------
Reynol,i;on town~h:o _
Grohom County _________ _
Cheooh iownshir-------------,~-Robbimville tov.r. _________________ _
Sonr,•,·rloh lov.n iPT) _____________ _ S1ecooti 1own~hip ________________ _
Yelluw (r~ck 1own1hip_" _____________ _
Sonl,·,•lloh town (pt.) _____________ _
90 NORTH CAROLINA
Persons in
hous,hold1
257 .!66
I? 252
6
151
2 1?5 ,: 268
12 671
\ 652
6'7
770
477
496
639
1\ 770
10 516
" I\ 505
2 II
J 206
8 932
152
113
14
4 694
!07
,0
53
6 068
l 0~"/
8 333
? ~75 1'.ic ns
136 1 J2
35 23?
517
Z6-!
3 "'' 4 65.1
.!~-:
6 9i"O
l 615
I 508
1 15!
326
115
I %6
\ 277
~ 931
? ,;3
il, "l','j
13 951
~~.)
iJ
II. Jel
'" 366
7 5.~
l 6 l ~·1
3 001
,.: ~:is
~~ en
95/
581
5
All hou1e-
hold1
\07 4 I?
' ''° 3
59
869
I "" 5 '13
736
' ?7-1
3 32.~ 1 go
3200 2 096
B 6aB
' 696
4 4 i0
86
I 280
3 "' 63 ,,
]
810
1 023 6
16
' 397
,:!.)
] 572
] .!58
5'> 121
59 1/DI')
I' 5Vl
' rn ;51
391
?&,:
'68
2 65CJ
67-<
56'/ no
52'!
'8 755 .:..73
2 7/JO
'h3,
1,5 j!.7 ; 3:Q
I ?SQ
3
5 17G
I 76/
107
230 I
,l I
'"
21?
It.:
" )\f
?C· 7;3
~;-7
2 ,;;1
J~ I ,:e.:.. !
77) I &!
\? ~73
3 ' :<) :,so
83
373
nB
i 3-:0
J ~57
? :3 I
i32 I
,\!i3
350 5n
.:6Q
365
-:S9
1:2
161
3i I ?-',
362
227
]
family bousrholds
Married·
couple
lotol fomjly
72 621 55 715
3 755 3 386
3 3
" 32
"" 663
271 '39
"" 137
-!5-! ·368
369 '13
' 2c. [''1
15, 13-1
7 575 2 302
' 697 I '" 6 363 5 319
2 972 1 232
3 3
3 496 3 083
72 . 63
982 "" 2 685 2 201
'6 37
;9 35
' ' 4.;2 258
560 379
2 ' 1, 14
80? SIB
335 280
2 ,:5~ 2 067
2 B80 1 590
36 171 " '" 36 25.i " 530
10 047 7 <),IQ
' .:..23 ' '" ,co 15
063 887
393 '60 117 Bl
905 33'
439 219
420 327
589 "' 39' 303
35 28
554 ,:.;o
363 285
938 315
l,Ot. 369
B ?0.'.-
125 ] 371)
372 I Ot.3
' 1
122 3 248
3)7 975
" '° "' 110
303 37;
S39 599
le7 m
!33 II 3
" l 75 753
I J 'il 6 10 63"1
,\",''.) .":&5 <,.·2 ]\', :..; 2,'.,
5h )07 2~,. ',',!C
' b1-e .:..95
~-!.'. 701 1,::; (,l")J
~90 519
77 73
161 ~?8
2.:s ,?6
92t 753
1 593 'l Q.;o
4!,:J 355 ·,, "/5
]77 3 ;e
263 t26
,It,/ :J83
352 17-:
,'f..; 121 -~u '" '" BJ?
697 "' 704 '" 13 12
191 161 ,n '" 1 2
f~rn~ie
houst•
hokier. no
husbond
rresent lotul
\-! 052 " m
179 855
6 " '" 151
SB 22)
.!53 307
76 287
\SS 605
.:66 I OBI
71 2,
"' 625
136 399 m 2 325
~03 ' 714
' 322 91, s ,,
"' 798
368 699
6 17
9
2
i 29 366
1~8 ,163
' ' ' 2'8 5'6
'6 "" 299 II S
221 578
,}23 23 610 i: .:·25 " 6'6
365 456 :
1'6 46$ 1
22 5)
'13 318
173 371
30 " -!59 745
i30 135
71 "' 117 191
59 '3J
5 13
88 10,
5' 110
510 761 :,:,s 361
.:..J9 ;5 593,
5C9 215 i
257 m·
i3\ "' 225 1.25
,2 IS
77 29
~06 '°' 1?1 3'5
" 4;
15 " 37.'. i 34 \ I
514 5 377 j
35 !57 :
i:;? ~3', .
~: 3 ' ~0S . ,~ ... i .i? ,'
13,I 2~.:..
' '/'ii i 1 07? :
,,, I 9(,0 ' ,, 1W I
2
l 37 30-1 i
]0. ',"J !
131 i ,11a :
'''. I 759 i
'.) l I ~0 :
3·; i ~2 I I~~ : J3
/,0 l'.'5 !
~? 108 I
,q "' 177
?!.6 606 211 ~61.,
" 107
' II
" 20
" 50
'
Houl-";..dder livill'j olon,,
' 'i '
,0101 I
29 870 no
13
132
"" \40
2-!5
515 S93
71
55,J
3-!7
982
.\4~ '
' 787
" 76'
63~
13
373
"' 3
513 i
11,} :
972 : ;
~95 i
20 m! 20 77.:..
12-J I
417 ' 5.:.. ; 29:;
320 ,o
66i
215
132 17!
129
i 3
16' 9~ .
'/Ci 3.:::
ss-:
06:3 5~'
9Q: :
386 i
" 117
306
.!,'.''
2:
6 36E
I J,"
1.:..::
Fi
3C,
,:2?
7,2:
! 69-: ,
(Ill
138 !
5
71:,-! : sr· I
36\: :
10~
I<
j~ ' 101 ,
63
I 10 '
',? : n
I\;
562
rl35
99
8
8' ,5
'
Totol
779 m
55
" 382
52
16 I
20.:
" "' I 15
506
]67
' 201
' 53 n:..
i 26
,JI
38~
119
35
10:;-
!,J?
30
273
j ?5
"
0
36
"
fr.1,ole Hou1d,olJ
7 975
120
" 57 m
69
135
'" " 14/,
91 ,30
3i3
' 157
" ns
91
0-!
?J
30 122 102
62
63
59 7
87 ,,
t.n
If,} i
CJ 1()7
• I
..;,! i
1/,'. i
(1/i
2 .• ~o
2.6b
1.00
2.58
2.t>-\
2.8S
2.-1'
7.2-1
2.3-!
2.3,:
2.1..)
2.M,
2.l,9
1.51
2.2.1
3.00
2.61
2.:.5
'2.50
1.6-1
2.41
2.35
,\.67
?.5?
;,_jJ
7.5'1
7.Y!
2 ,"ii., :n
2 /I
1.5'1
?.60
2.26
I. 7)
1.51
2.5'1
U,7
3 ! ; I
?.~:
ln11i1u-
tioi,ol11~d
101,JI pe1'>0n1
ll 41? 3 .:93
'
ll!? 138
B9 8'1
337 336
170 170
215 no
163 \63
i/S 220
30
"/5
/.16
],!6
l.'!
'19
M
9c6 s,:.:
JW
11 /
10!.
"
'"
087
Oili'
161
50
,01 ,r:,
10
10
6
30
15
? 385
'l 355
568
119
'"'
377
:i3B
.tSS
!06
'°' 3'
'"
163
50
0Jhtr'~
'"»,
• Qrc,,_
q,ian., -
~:.9\
., e
"
SUMMARY POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTI
1990-Con.
te :I Subdivision
ce
c----"-d_,_,_~---t----------<State
County
County
Place
Persons pe! ~
{lftitf;J=:=:=:::==::::==: ·on !owns hip ____________________ _
!101,em lownship ______________ _ ·'1·.>rc low•.1 _________________ _ ·.•. •llt lown (pl.) _____________ _
,; , townsh,p _________________ _
',',, 1lle lawn (pl.) _____________ _
:d·1 Grove lownship _______________ _
Ceuntf _____ ----------------~·~g~:;s;::\::::):::::
'o,son rnwn_____ _ _____ _
'.',ount Olive lown (µ!.) ____________ _
;!Il~ll!:;f:ii=iil/::lll:l
·onsville township ________________ _
<enonsv,lle 1own _________________ _ ,,,, .. township _________________ _
'.' lie town-------------------?' township _________________ _
:. lio lown __________________ _
,;,sn township ________ _
1crrells town (pl.) ___ ••
.'alloce town (pl.) ·-·· -· ::IJ;~f ::~::::::::::=::==:
::c,sow 1own ··········-:mcpe town1hip _
~l;~;,,~::I:;;;;;;;;;;:;;;;;;
·~r·,wood CDP (pl.) ••••••••••••••••
inon township·················-)1··'--, city (pl.) -·····----·•----: , lownshiP.-••.•••••••.••.•••.
, ' , 1own1h,p •••••••••••••••••
),_ city (pl.) •••••••• - ---··-- -
:;wnon CDP .•.
:n1le township ___ •••••••••••••••••
·nopel H,11 town (pt.) ••••••••••••••
:.,,.,city (pt.)·-·-···········--·:.. me town (pl.) ··-----------·
'; o<l COP (pt.) •• ·--------······
:,T,\H, County ____ •• _ ••••••••••••••
~ship l, To!horo ···-·-···-····---
.t,•••ll~0~;n.=====::::::::::::::
-:, 2. lower Conetoe ••••••••••••
:~ 1own •••••••••••••••••••• .;, ... 3, Upper Con~lae ••• ________ _
i;-eed lawn •••• ·-·-······--·-·--
.c.1hip 4, Dfep Creek-------·-·-···
·;;·· sl~~~~~r-~~~~~~~ .~~~-~: =: =: =: = ~· 6, Upper ftshm!J Cree~--------
/: ·rs town (pl.J--·-----····---
.,1hiD 7. Swift Cree~ •••. -···-----·,:1:iebo!O lown (pt.) ••••••••••••••
;rl.-1 Mount city (pt.l ·····---··---'13. Sporto _____ ·-·--··-·--··
·:~, , f~1~:lt~~l;~\~:C:r;;k=~~~~~:~~
:~~:ops town···-·-·····-·······-.. 11hip 11, Wolnut Creel._ ,,,,· · 12, Ro..:~y Moun1 ___________ _
J. lovnt ,i1y (pt.)-•------·----
n· 13, Co>ey ................ .
.·, 14, Urper Town Creek ••••••••
so,~1 urg to· ... ·n (µI.) ••••••••••••••
(ounry ----·---···········-·--"leek 1own1hir.--·-·--·-·----J inl city (pt.) _________ ·-·---·
<1 ~ille lown !pt.) ••••••••••••••
·~. ,orden CDP !p1.L •••••••••••.
,ss Creek rown1hip •••••••••••••
>Jnio township •••••••••
,r~I Holl town ••••••••••••••••••• ' .. 'l'ille COP (pt.l. •••••••••••• ,~ township ----•·-····---~, ;o,den COP (pt.) •••••••••• __
, .. v .. ,,ille 1O ... nship ••••••• ___ • ___ _
,crnmons villoQe (pl.l •••• ___ ··-···-
~11-.ille town1hip ••••• ___ •••••• _. _ ·•,ille !own !pr.l ........... __ _ "· 'ordcn COP (pt.) ••••• _. _____ _
1 town_ship ··-······------··-~ ns v1llo~e {pt.) ••••••• ______ _
-~•,1v,:le CDP···-----·---·-·--··-
All person~
27 859
I 786
2 504
7 990
I 631
~ 636
971
7 01.:
3 399
2 795
39 995
I 359
7 695 3 170
"' 701
I
005 7 '.,OS
51? 2.:~
2 ?I 1
3 616
856 5 ~2'i n3
971
7,7
185
2
'J 763
I te7
I 893
5 297 2 859
2 022
181 B35 1
2 OJ~ I
138 m I 136 517
1
13 set
" 3 902
12 t,:n
. 33
I 090
1 l 013
I 115
18
56 5~8
16 lu.
I 651
l1 03'/
I 553
291
72-!
8B so, ,a,
10& 75,
"" 3 153
260
)3J
74&
,1'73
3 2?3
l 51.:
l 597
20 232
17 057
l 471
l 171
)0
265 878
12 ~3,:
' 152
2 ')95
4 357
12 671
I 65/
4 617
7 770
,H7
8 833 5 809
71 995
\0 68.:
12
11 so~
211
3 206
: 2
;
. '--: 7
,7
.. 2
: 1.B
1
Square
mile:
765.?
J'/,2
42,"/
S4.7
27,.,
37,4
8
I
4'!.7
'·' ns
817 .8
38.7
83.3
75.3
1,0
.8
35.3 93,5
1.6
8
1,8
107.4
1.9
97. l
I,)
55.4
1.0
51.8
.3
24.9 u
47.1
56.0
2,5
5?.4
290.6
24 . .\
77.3
67.8
30.9
.I
69.0
43.8
I.I
3.1
1.5,3
6
3
, 0
505. l
37,4
1.0
9.1
40.5
' 57.,l
.3
33.6
35.B
,7
54.4
53.5
I
" 31.7
24.6
5
24.5
1,0
24.5
38.4
5.9
?8.5
12.4
.I
409.7
34.6
.S
,.9
30.2
30.4 1,0
6.•
18.1
.8
18.5
•.6
30.9
6.7
33.9
.I
3.7
\ I.RY POPULATION AND HOUSING CHA',4CTERISTICS
Squn!r f.i-Square
lo,neter mile
,10,6 105.0
18.5 ,\8_0
2/.'/ 58.6
56.4 \46. l
7?.8 58.?
55.3 I 43.1
485.5 713.8
5'1.4 l,1iL6
26).5 6?3. 7
31.8 97,8
lB.9 48.9
I 3.1 356 17.5 32 ~
16 3 42. l
192.4 481.0
318.6 876,3
11,0 23 6
3 i 3 812
121.9 3'20.0
116.? 305.0
631.8 617.2
13.0 33.7 \"l,U .:50.5
2\.6 55.?
191.6 777.5
13.8 35.6
276.7 747.0
8.8 2?.9 ,, 6.1
42.8 111.0
390.0 990.0
l~.5 40.2 36 5 ?4,6
433.2 143.6
\4.9 38.6
2t. I 6 6?'.,.7
32.2 SJ . .:
691.9 I 792 7
777.5 2 013.7
20.0
173.5 449.3
80.0 160.0
21.8 56.6
109.6 263.7
l \.8 30.0
136.3 351.6
94.0 243.1
7?6.4 858.3
21.5 60.0
792.) ow.s
~3.2 11~.0
166.9 431 .7
611.9 652 0 469.7 212 9
14,8 38.3
324.4 730.0
4.9 12.6
125.7 293.3
9.2 23.9
16,0 41.4
60.0 154.3
12.4 32.2
46.l.0 160.0
23.5 60.8
933.3 2 800.0
13.0 33.6
?7.4 71. l
3'!9.2 986.0
51.9 134.4
58?.3 514.0
?.~.? 65 2
203,5 526,9
12?.2 2 891.0 19,9 SI .6
36,5 ?4.~
233.3 700.0
250.6 649,0
13A.9 359.4
60.0
l \6.9 304.0
310. l 791 A
55.6 144.3
161.0 416.8 635,4 652.0 278, l 721.4
166.0 429.3
238.5 596.3
184.4 477.5
488,2 262.8
274.6 :111.8
614.0 594.6
131 .0 339.4
055.0 , 110.0
337.5 866.5
Subdivision
fur1~1h Cour11y--(on
A\1ddlc fn,l r~"n:J,ip ..••.•••.•••••••
S1unlcyvillc COP 11,1.).: •••••••.•••••
Wol>c,to·am 1own (pl,) •••••••••••••
w,n~lon-Solem (iTy (r,1.J ••••••
01,1 ~ichr,,ond low11ship •••••••.
f'.i119 cil\' (;,:
OIJ Town ro"rsi,ip. --·-··--·-···-·-
S10nlt•yvtllc rnr 1µ1.1 •••••••••••••••
Winslon·Sole111 [i1y (~T) •••••
Sol,•m Chnpel rownship ----···--
Wolleno"·n to,,n (r,1.1 --·----------Sou1h !or\ io"n;lti1, ••••••.••••••••
Winsion-~~!e111 ,i1y (~:.! ........... .
Vicnno I0,.nsh.~ ••..••••••••••••••
Wins Jon 1owns~.i1, ••••••
Win;lon-$~1,:n ri1y (pl ) _.
fron;lin Couri:·,, ••.••••• lm,r,~l,ip I, ['_,r,n ••••
Bt'!I~ 1owr ••••••••••.••••••••••••
lownsh;p 2. fi~nis •••••.••••••••••••
Township 3. :oungsvi:lr ••••••••••••••
Young1.-1lle Town •••••• _ •••••• __ •••
Townsbjp ,:, fronHn1on __________ ·-··-
fronll;orcm 10-~n -·---·-····-······
lownship S, ~0-.ew;ll1-•••••••••••••••
Township 6. ~cnu·y Crr·e:, ············-
To"'nship 7, Gold Mine----------·-·--
Cen1er..illc 10.,,n. _. ___ ••••• _ •••••••
lownshjp B. Udo, Roe< ••••••••••••••
Township 9. C,~,e~, (,,,es ........... .
Jownship 10. loui1buf9 •••••••••••••••
louisbufg t~·.,n -···-·-·-·--
Goston Coun:·,-•.••••••• Cherryville to\\os~i~.·--
Che;r,-ville o:y _
DEllview lo,-,r, •••••••••••••••••••• Crcw~e,s Mowsicin 10·,-r.,.".;~ •••• _. _ •• __
Besseme, (,r; ciiy •••
Gcstonio ci:; (pl.)_
Kiny1 /,\01.-nloin (ity 1~1.) ••••••••••••
Oollas rownshi, ••••• _ ••••••••••••••• Dollos !Own ••••••• ·-· _________ ••• GGstonio city (pt.], _____ • _________ _
iliyh Shoals ci1y •••••••••••••••••••
Ranlo !own (pl.) ••••••••••••••••••
Ston!ey :own (pl,). Goslonio 1own1hip ••• ___ •• __ • _. __ ••••
Ga11onio ci~1 (pl.) •••••••••••••••••
Lowell ci:y (pl.) •••••••••••••••••••
Ronlo town (pl.)···--
South Gc1to.,ic cor -----•-----•··-Speuce, Mou~loin town (~1.:, •• ~ ••••• _
Rive1bend towr,s!'lip ••••••••••••••••••
l,\ounl Holly (Lly (pt,) ••••••••••••••
Sr,encei l,•.o~nloin lown (pt.) ••••••• ~.
Stanley lov..1 (~U·-··--··-·----•·· Sou1h Poin! :c·,mship ••...•••• _______ _
Belmont ciry •••••••••••••••••••••
Crornerto~ 10·,m -·-··--······--··· Gostonio (ity {pt.) •••••••••••••••••
towel! ci:1 ip:.) •••
McAden.-ille 1own ·------·------·--
Moimt liolly city (1,:.:, ---·······-···
Go1e1 Counly ••••••••••••••••••••••••
Gatesville town~hip-•••• __ •
Gole1vilie Town____ ·•------•·
Holl township --------·-··-··-·---·· Hoslelt townshi~ •••••••.••••••••••••
Holly Grove to·,,nship ••••••••••.••••••
Hvnte11 N.ill lo;,nship ••••••••••••••••
Miotonsville ro,.,nship •
Rrynoldso~ 1ownship •
G!ohom Coun1t ••••••••• _.
(hfooh 1own1hip __ •• _
Rabbinsv0lle :own ___ _
~cn:ceIloh town (pt.) ·····-------··
Siecooh 1ownshi;:, --·---·-··-·---·-·-Ytllow C1fel 1c,.nship ••••••••••••••••
Sonlc,•ll□ h town (pl.) .•••••••••••••
Gronville Covnly ········--·---·-·-··-· Brnsifield lownship •••••
Out..:hville 1own1hip ···-----···--··-·-ButMr COP ••••••••••••••••••••••
C,cl'dmoo< city •••••.•••••••••••••
fishing Creel Iownship ••.•••••••••••••
Oxford ci~t (pl.I·-·------·-
Oc~ Hill lowm,hi:, ··---·--·-------··-
O~ford townshio ••••••••••••.•••••••
Oxford city inr.) ····---·-·-·-····· Solem township •••••••• _____ ••• ___ ••
Sossofros for> township
S1ovoll town---·•----········--·
Jolly llo lown1hip ..... ·---·····--··· Stein town •••••••••••
Wolnul Grove I own ship _ •••.••• _.
All persons
160
"' 113
" 69'
5 )07
10
53
6 098
l 087
8 333
9 450
\tJ 471
I 43 418
36 414
,1 936
36'
3 609
J 684
"' 6 970
\ 615
l 516
2 154
I 390
115
I 966
I 272
7 917
3 037
175 093
\4 068
4 756
10 ,, 'II
' 698
366
756
18 373
3 0\2
605
,66
75 545
54 \ 19
l 650 5 487
115
19 405
~ 5\9
20
2 357
33 291
8 434
2 371 "' 2 704
830
3 191
9 30S
l 780
308
l ?53
l 020
I 636
I 769
I 001
I 340
7 196 5 652
109
" 957
587
5
38 345
4 353
10 on
4 679 I so,
7 502
3 571
I 560
6 573
4 3J2
I 181
2 186
'°' 3 ?46
1'9
l 715
Land OfPO PNSMI pei-
SQuarc lilo-Square Squme ki-$qvo!e
melC!S miles lomettr mile
,\7,1, 16 5 215.O 55S.7
1 .3 217.1 506.7
8 .3 141.J 376.7
'/7.8 30.1 60.3 155.9
,2 .I
22.5 6.7 227,0 '.",87,0
.2 .I 50.0 100,0
.I 530.0
87.9 33.9 69.J i7'il.9 2,9 I.I 37.\,8 988,?
61.2 ?3.6 136.? 353, I
.4 .I
76. l 29.4 124.7 321.4
183.8 71 0 780.6 2 070.7 183.'l 70.9 780,7 2 on.s
213.? 491,6 28.6 74.1
129.7 SO. I 38.1 98,5
'·' .5 260.0 ns.o
\49.6 57.8 24. 1 62,4
122.6 47.3 38.2 99,0
1.5 6 287,7 706.'7
184. I 71.1 37.9 98,0
2.0 8 BOU 2 OlB,8
87.3 33.7 17,4 45.0
131.5 50.8 16.4 42.4
102.1 39.4 13.6 35.3 ,7 .3 IM.3 383.J
119.9 46.3 16,4 ,l?,5
92.8 35.B 13.7 35.5
1S3.7 59.3 51.5 133.5 ,, 1.9 619.8 598.4
923.J 356 5 189.6 491. l
169.-1 65.4 83.0 215. l
9.4 3.6 506.0 13?1.l
.I .I 100,0 100,0
126.3 45.8 I lt. l 295.3 ,., 3,5 510.7 342.3 ·' ,2 915.0 I 830.0 ,8 .3 945.0 2 520.0
151.3 58.4 121.4 314.6
3.1 ,.. 814. I 2 15\.4
4,6 1.8 131.5 336.1
.I
.9 ' 517.8 165.0
182.8 70,6 413.3 070,0
'1'1.6 29.9 697.4 8\0.0
.I .I
2.8 I.I 589.3 500.0
17.4 6.7 315.3 819.0
,9 3 127.8 383.3
)J4,4 55.8 134.4 347.8
12.0 4.6 376.6 982.4 ·' .1 50.0 100.0
4.2 1.6 561.2 473. l
149. l 57.6 223.3 578.0
14.9 S.7 566.0 479.6
9.3 36 2.54.9 658.6
7 3 352.9 823.3
6.7 2.6 403.6 0..:0.0
36 I.< 230.6 592.9
5.6 2.1 569.8 519.5
882.2 JtO 6 10.5 ?7.3
118.3 45.7 I 5.0 38,9
I.I .4 280.0 770.0
139.? 53.8 9.0 23.3
80.0 30.9 l?.8 33.0
143.7 55.5 11,4 29.5
180.4 69.6 7 0 18.2
90.6 35.0 11.1 28.8
130.0 S0.2 10.3 26.7
756,5 292. l 9,5 24.6
425.3 164.2 13.3 34,4
12 ' 590.6 772.5
5 .2 84.0 210,0
145.9 56.3 6.6 l7.0
185.3 71.5 3.1 81
375.7 531.2 27.9 72.2
206,0 79.6 21.1 50
136.8 S2.8 73.3 189.9
17.8 6.9 262.9 678,1
5.• 2.1 ?78.S 7!6,2
IM.? "' 45,7 118.3
,,3 1.1 830.5 2 100.6
153.3 S9.2 10.? 26.A
104.0 ~0.1 63.2 163.5
6,5 2.S 668.0 736.8
74.3 28,7 15.9 41. l
172.8 66.7 12.7 32.8
2.7 1.0 151.5 40?,0
193.0 74.5 16.8 43./",
2., ,9 103.8 276.7
171.? 66.l 10 0 25.9
NORTH CAROLINA 241
;
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: Update on Status of Well Head Protection Programs in N.C.
I spoke with Carl Bailey, Groundwater Planning Branch Section Chief at [phone]. l
asked him about Well Head Protection Areas (WHPAs) in North Carolina. Mr. Bailey said that
Wally Venrick, Public Water Supply Section Chief, would be the most knowledgeable-person
on this subject.
r called Mr. Venrick at [phone]. He said that North Carolina has extended an invitation
to communities to establish WHPAs, but none have been established. The cost to the
community of establishing a WHPA exceeds the savings realized from waivers for certain
analytical requirements. He docs not anticipate that any WHPAs will be established prior to
1996.
Mr. Venrick said that there arc mm1mum allowable distances between wells and certain
structures (e.g. 100 feet between septic tanks and wells), but distances are arbitrary and
vary depending on the structure.
r.i'Plt:Ckr• .. ,--·, ,w ·,•--•··e, ...-:rn
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Reprint from North Carolina Administrative Code: 15 NCAC 28 .0308 Current through: June 30, 1989
\,
' I I
;
i
\
' ' I ' ' '
f i
I ' ' \
t I
' I .,
I I ' \ J I I ' 1 I
i I 1 I \ i l
1
\
I
i
' ' ' ' LI
' ' ' ' ' ~
-11
••
ll
ll
11
11
11
/\'!/CD -l:i\'V/!10,\',\I{:VTA!, MA,\'AC!:,\1/:.:\'T
TIS: 02/J .0300
SECTIO\' .0300 -ASSIG:\.\IC:\T or STREA:'11 CLASSIFICA TIOi\S
.0301 CL\SSIFIC..\TIO',"S: CE\'ERAL (a) Schedule of Classi11calions. The classifications assigned to the waters of the State of Nor1h Carolina arc sci forth in the schedules of classilications and water quality standards assigned to the waters of the river basms of i'ior1h Carolina, 15 NCAC 28 .0302 to .OJ 17 which are on fue m the OITicc of the Atlomcy General of \'orlh Carolina. These classilications are based upon the existing or con-templated best us:igc of the v.:uious streams and segments of streams in the basin, as dctcnnincd through studies and evaluations and the holding of public hearings for consideration of the classifica-tions proposed.
(b) Stream !fames. The names of the streams listed in the schedules of assigned classillcations were taken as far as possible from United Slates Geological Survey topographic maps. Where topographic maps \\'ere unavailable, U.S. Corps of Engineers maps, U.S. Dcpar1ment of Agriculture soil maps, and ;\onh Carolina high\\'ay maps were used for the selection of stream names. (c) Classifications. The classifications assigned to the waters of J\1orth Carolina arc denoted by the letters \VS-I, \VS-II. IVS-Ill, 13, C, S,\, Sil, and SC in the column headed "class." A brief explanation of the "best u~agc'' for which the w.:itcrs in each class must be protected is given as fo!Jo\vs: fresh Waters
Closs \VS-I:
Class \VS-II:
Class IVS-Ill:
Class IJ:
Class C:
Tidal Salt Waters
Class S;\:
Cl:tss Sil:
Class SC:
\\·:itcrs protCctcd as water supplies which arc in natural and uninhabited or predominantly undeveloped (not urbanized) watersheds; no point source disch.:irgcs arc permitted and local land m~rnagement programs to control non point source pollution are required; suitable for all Class C uses; \\"Jtcrs protected as water supplies which are in low to moderately dc\'clopcd (urbanized) \\"alt.:rshcds; discharges arc restricted to primarily domestic \\·astc.:w;_itcrs or industri;:d non-process waters specifically appfon:d by the commis5,on: local land management programs to control nonpoint source pollution :.nc required; suitable for all Cbss C uses; water supply scgmcnt \\·ith no categorical restrictions on watershed dc,·clopmcnt or discharges; suitable for aU Class C uses; rrimary recreation :.ind any other usage specified by the "C" cbssification: fi::;h ;u1d \\·ildlifc propag::ition, secondary recreation, agriculture, and other uses requiring \\"a(crs of lowc.:r quality.
shcllfohin~ for m:irkct purposes and any other usage specified by the "SB" and ''SC" classificition;
prirn~try rccrc:llion and ,:my other usage specified by the "SC" classific:i.tion; fish and wildlife propagation, secondary recreation, and other uses requiring \\"atcrs of lower quality.
Supplemental Cbssific.1tions
Trout Waters:
Swamp Waters:
Suii:ibk for natural trout prop.1gation and maintenance of stocked trout; \\'atns which ha\·c lmv velocities and other natural ch.'.lractcristics which an: c..liffrrcnt from adjacent s!rcams; :'<ulricnt scnsili\·c waters which require limitations on nutiicnt inputs; outsl;rnding resource \\·atcrs which arc unique and special \Va!trs of txccptiona! st:Jtc or nation:11 recreational or ecological signific,:rncc which rc.:quirc special protection to m;Jint.1in existing uses. (d) \\':ncr Qu:dity S1and:1rds. The n·;J!cr qu;di1y standards aprlic.1b!c to each classification ;issigncJ .:ire those.: cst;il:dishL·d in 15 \."Cr\C 21! .0200, Cla~sifications and \V.J.tcr·Quality S1.1ndards 1\pplic:ible to the Sud:icc \\'~11cr:-of \onh C:iroli11a, :1s .:idoptcd by the \'onh Ca.rolin:1 En\·irnnmcntal .\1an:igc-rncnt Comniis:-ion.
(c) lmk.\ :\unihcr
\
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ 1\'RCD -t:NV/1/0,V.\ff:i\',. -'~ MANAGE,\fENT T/5: 028 .0300
(I) Reading the Index Number. ·n,e index number appearing in the column so designated is an iclc.ntification number assigned to each stream or segment of a stream, indicating the specific tributary progression between the main stem stream and the tributary stream. (2) Cross-Referencing the Index Number. ·n,e inclusion of the index number in the schedule is to provide an adequate cross reference between the classiJication schedules and an alphabetic Llst of streams.
(f) C!assiJication Date. The classiJication date indicates the date on which enforcement of the pro-visions of Section 143-215.1 of the General Statutes of North Carolina became elTectivc with reference to the classification assigned to the various streams in North Carolina. (g) Reference. Copies of the schedules of classiJications adopted and assigned to the waters of the various ri\'cr basins may be obtained at no charge by writing to:·
Director
Division of Environmental Management
Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Post Office l3ox 27687 ·
Raleieh, :'\orth Carolina 2761 I (h) Places where the schedules may be'inspected:
(i) Unnamed Streams.
Di,·ision of State Library
Archives --State Library l3uilding
109 E. Jones Street
Raleigh, :-S:orth CaroLlna.
(l) Any stream \\·hich is not" named in the schedule of stream classifications carries the same classi-fication as that assigned to the stream segment to which it is tributary except: (1\) unnamed streams specifically described in the schedule of classifications; or (IJ) unnamed fresh\\'atcrs tributary to tidal saltwaters will be classified "C"; or (C) after \ol'Cmbcr I, I 986, any nc\\'I)' created areas of tidal saltwater which arc connected to Cbss SA waters by appro\·ed dredging projects will be classified "SC" unless case-by-case rc-cbssification proceedings are conducted. (2) The following ri\-'cr basins have different policies for unnamed streams entering other states or for ~pccific areas of the basin:
J·liwasscc River Ilasin (Ruic .0302)
Lit1lc Tennessee Ri\·cr Dasin and Savannah River Drainage /\rca (Ruic .0303)
f'rench l3road Ri,·er Ilasin (Ruic .0304) Watauga River Basin (Ruic .0305)
Broad River Ilasin (I, ule .0306)
C-:ew River Ilasin (1,ule .0307)
Catawba River Basin (Rule .0308)
Yadkin-l'ce Dec River Ilasin (Rule .0309) Lumber River Ilasin (Ruic .0310)
Roanoke River Ilasin (Rule .OJJJ) Tar-Pamlico Ri,·cr Ilasin (Rule .0316)
Pasquotank River Ilasin ( R ulc .OJ I 7)
History Note: S tatwo,y Authority G.S. /43-2 /4./; 143-215./; /43-2 I 5.3 ( a) (I); £ff Febnmry ( 1976;
Amended Clf Nol'cmber I, /986; Febniary I, 1986; January I, /985; September 9, 1979.
i
I :\'Of/ Tl/ C-11/0LI.\.-I .-1 I) \ll,\'/S[/1.-1 Tl IL COOi, 02/22/89
I NRCD -·DIVIROl!lilll'!AL KANAGEY
I . 0308 CATAWBA RIVER BASDI
Naire of Stream
I Unnamed Tributary at
Orthopedic Hospital
I Shoal Branch
Hill Creek
I Long Cove
Porter Branch
I Studman Branch
.~ Crolo'ders Cre€k ·
I Squirrel Branch
McGill Creek
I Unnamed Tributary at
Camp Jame...s ( Camp
J ame.s Lake )
Unnamed Tributary at
I camp James
Abernethy Creek
First Creek
I Bessemer Branch
Oats Creek
Oakland Lake
-~ Blackvood Creek
Ferguson Branch
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
McGill Brunch
South fork Crowders Creek
South Crowders Creek
Unname<l Tributary at
Sparro,,,, Springs Lake
(Sparrow Springs Lake)
Onnaued Tributary at
Sparrov Springs Lake
Rocky Branch
Torrence &ranch
Sugar Creek
ln•in Creek
Dillons r,..,ins Lakes
and Lake Jo
Sle,,,,art Creek
Ta99a..rt Creek (Ta99ard
Description
FrClll source to Catawba Creek
Fran source to Catavba Creek
Frooi source to North Carolina-South
Carolina State Line
Frooi source to Lake Wylie, Catawba
River
Fran source to Lake Wylie, Catawba
River
Froo source to Lake Wylie, Catawba
River
Fran source to North Carolina-South
Carolina State Line
Frcrn source to Crcr.roers Creek
Fran source to Cro;.>ders Creek
Fran source to Dam at Camp Ja.aes Lake
Fran Dam at Camp James Lake to
Crowders Cre€!k
Fran source to CrO'Jders Creek
frcm source to Abernethy Creek
Frcm source to Crwders Creek
Fran source to Abernethy Creek
Entire lake and connecting stream to
CrO'wders Creek
Frcxn source to Cro;.,ders Creek
Fran source to Crwders Creek
Fran source to Cr™ders Creek
North Carolina Portion
Frcm source to South Fork Crowders
Creek
Fran source to Darn at Sparr™ Springs
Lake
Fran Dam at Spa.ITW Springs Lake to
South fork Cra,.,ders Creek
Class
C
C
C
1/S-Ill&B
C
C
C
C
C
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
B
C
Fran source to North Caroli.na-South C
Carolina State Line
Frcm source to North Carolina-South B
Carolina St.ate Line
Frro source to North Carolina-South
Carolina State L)J)e
Fran source to Sugar Creek
Entire lakes and connecling streams
to In.in Creek
Frcxn source to Irvin Creek
Fran source to Sugar Creek
22
C
C
C
C
C
2R .0300
Classification
Date Index No.
9/1/74 11-130-3
9/1/74 11-130-4
9/1/14 11-131
2/1/86 11-132
9/1/74 11-133
9/1/74 11-134
9/1/74 11-135
9/1/74 11-135-1
9/1/74 11-135-2
3/1/62 11-135-3-(1)
9/1/74 11-135-3-(2)
9/1/74 11-135-4
9/1/74 11-135-4-1
9/1/74 11-135-5
9/1/74 11-135-5-1
9/1/74 11-135-6
9/1/74 11-135-7
9/1/74 11-135-B
9/1/74 11-135-9
3/1/62 11-135-10
3/1/62 11-135-10-1
3/1/62 11-135-10-1-1-(1)
3/1/62 11-135-10-1-1-(2)
9/1/74 11-135-11
3/1/77 11-136
9/1/71 11-137
9/1/74 11-137-1
9/1/74 11-137-1-1
9/1/74 11-137-1-2
9/1/74 11-137-2
I ·'.·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
February 18, 1991
To: Davis Park Road TCE Site File
From: Bruce Nicholson
Subj: Telecon with CHris Goodreau, NC Wildlife Resources Fisheries
Biologist, [phone].
I spoke with Mr. Goodreau concerning the use of Blackwood and
Crowders Creek as fisheries: He said he thought he had no data on
these creeks, he would check on that and get back to me if he found
any. Just based on what he knows about Crowders Creek he would say
that there is virtually no use of Crowders Creek in the Gastonia
area and only very limited use, perhaps a little bridge fishing by
locals, several miles downstream.
bin/tel/davis2
" "' .aa.ai: && wwwaawww wm= "' = -=--
, I
--
---
..
_,_
.,
...
+/
--·
_,
--
----·-·
'.),1 )·-: (' f~,,.o'-.'. i1 '"---;-;-::.-:::: --c ... -,..J
{' I I .1. ' .
"'-•.•1-· 1'
' '
',J~nr-'>·•'7-•fl--,-~ i')-L
I, .-I ,v·,s
-, , lh")T(J-·'{I
---r ·,c(-'T·· -, ,.,f T':Y ·ip:;·-:, -, 1T''"O-
I , 1 C
/} ?----t-~•~,-..1.,-••<'~ f-.)(,> I , .
-Cf ,.!" S> .. .-.! l---,--., " , --(·J--
I ; '' ~ /; ., . i; ~{ -1~ "f l'
(._. ,.':, ~ •"},~IA
/
-f..-..\-------i--: ')/ ''7 I 1''1cl "' ( 1y--,_ .,, -r ,~--· :• C
~,-;,,-e_,; •(, V ,•-··, T"I -'' /"-f-~I 5
...p;;, + ~l-.. ~-, / -,~,-_-::--:7:,f -'i/
I. • ! .... ,.(-{. ~(--,.,..r;~-,,_?_· l (,_ . I i V
,, 7 ·,;y p,:.1--.-p,;---,;-!---~,/;,1,---,, ..
.2 _( "') 15 ·; (,,9
i' 7"'7c-~'jc-y r:-·n-,
I
!? L i'f ~f" I 7, ,l()l "',y'p' !-, '</l
~ I
I ---
I
--,------·--~h-,;rj'' :_ ' ';' -·/--•-,r---
--~-----·
<>,(_ --1-~~ ., I ". ---yr::----r-( /2
I
U/ I / ,,.-; ~ ',?
I -
d ,..f/, t -1 ___ f, .. / C:, ·y:, \Y
... '"':l-1 ·?0•1,,J-y-_<; .I,_;,
-i'.L! .s .3~ !J >t11 ·f'i((I
I ' ,;,1.; r;-r ,._, +""'i"
! ' . ' T ______ ! I
I I
I
_---~~~--~ ---------·-1·-----------f---------+
-
-
-
-
-
___ , ____ , ______ J, ___ .......J_
i ~-----_--_·----.-_-_-__ -__ ----_---, __ --_-__ -'--'•·· · 1 __
--------------1----J..-..--..-..-.--------------,--=
-
-
=
~
~
-
-:, ... ~ .. ~~-~•~"'#F.~~ . __ :·~>;~~~ -.. ·, ..
.,,"'-~
!
I
I I
I
I I I
I
4 I
---~ ~
-"¥ '1 I I _ _j~ I
__ <::,):_ _______ i ___ I i ----..
---~ I I <: n I e, ,, ! ' I ----· --------
'<]·-I ' ---Q: ' ,,.,
I H -__ ] ! I
------·-· I ----.-----1 ---·--· i
·--. -·
----'..q '::::----+----+-----+----+------
-----1----_l__ __ ·---·· -----·----·-1-----1-
----·--1---1-----'------_______ _I __ _
I
!
I
I
i
' i
i
i
. -?.,-~~~~1~)-_-L..-_-~-.1 1..., ~;..., __ I :=iz'---·-· --''v.,_,~ ct._ l--,.,_J'-------
r l ·11 , . I 1'
.:;., t::_--~ I.,,,,_:_ .--~ ,;-::'.,.•"J ,J_ Lj "'! '1,;, '
--------I ; y--,.,,_..___~. -------'~---
__ Tv\.,_: _ -~ -~--~<-.<-, --'-i -'"t_!~b •,~~-/~.Le· _ _/ ,.~ .. (~: .--.-c",-, L:: . ..:.:...!..-fr~,_~7
!(
~
.. " I , I ;I /? ., / I -
,·,. ~-< 1'.fl •.vu~ ., ,. 0;, & C If" •
.f' ---,i~ .:\ D ;{ 6 -'1 -> L I :L_!;..,_~.~·~· -/~'----/----
___ 'i "d~J ~ ,f J;;,l=_ ,.,._L _L ~-1 ,./ J.!.-, __ ;'.Cfl•-··'-------
----"-'-~pJ t((,; ' -~ I ,? ), .LO ( Ll-.+ h; t-Jl-J .. · +
__ i~,C<,. _ _:~_ +~ -~,, ;,J C _,I.. LlL...c ·-,,,_rs_ __ _
. , 1,...,---/·' . 1 _ l-I · 1 ____ fl-,.,✓.--:, __ 11 -) .<.....:.... .,f-f~~~L.i::",~,;.'-----'1 ___ _
i-, ;;,1 f j., . .,,...__ 10-,e_~ _}j.;f eMLj i ~9 : // £.,c:__~ __ ---~+=--~/_____ !), .. i, cl ' le, --------__ ~c===i ' /,~--=i)~ l-2->;"ir
' _,.,-:~ "•. -:'Th:j:!t"'it,;
.. -',~ -_,
·--
.
B., j. , .... ,,,.c.,--A' / , ;7/' r..,·.,._) I 5L '-J-7<>1~
J. !' J t;:_,,_~ 5:,._71,_ -
I h -....... !: -s.,-} c:_.,-,.·•~ I ,--.. :J;t!..
I I r,...,.,.. _, / ,, l ' '
\
----1----1----'-+--·-·-· -----... ·
----1------------·-----
I
/ C "L • '_7._.
/~-~ I~
--------,-------·--------
\ I I ------,-j--------~--.---·-,,-, ----+--------· -.
-----i----1-----_____ i"-~~----i!---
----~-~-----7·-----\-, --~-
==7-~!------\.\--!-~
I
-
j) f'1f, -----'•-----+----,.---~----'------
I
- --·------------ -____ /_-~.. -+----------,~~
I -~:~-------
1
1 I ---------
'
I '---l-------------·-• ----T ---------
1 ---------------+--I~
-1---• --- -------_J ___ .. ~--~
I
i
-------______ ! ______ -----_., __
I I -------------------
-------------------------------------
I
I -----------c: 17 c;1";Ti-_,., -I 7·7c/ ---'£·?/ ---iJ_7_j ____ ~c-
----'----+-7 ',(7--7;,7---i~ T r-n ----
-----1--------j-rl'~-'7? <f-------z,:~-J---·-----7-T(f------------
--------e--------Tr-1}?-----;,,-:,> ;J,-{ t ,-r0T-
---------------
1 I
i -=-=-=-== -r=~--==------------------_______ _!_ --- -----------
---------___________ /_ __ -----
...• ---i=-----__ ----~ I -_
---+-----+-"-✓---{ /I?~ __ >, '7/ :l:~=~~-
_(',; ;4/ ,rc-F"-;-}/ "½ r--:,/IC,----:::>
--------------1----+----
------------------1---------------------------1------
! --
----t------+--L,--. c_L_,_.J,_c:_'_7_,_ -·-z:-:;;· -~-c-~--, -':'(-
_, I, ,--,:_;,;~ I 7 / ,-cc, -S
<'. '/ /, Io"} Z. · l / -,~_-;:;_._, a
-r··---.... ;, J, J.:::.::·,~-·1-______ ., __
,-.,,, -fl,/ -· ) __ ---
1
~,---,-; '" \I 'cl •1"id
-------,-----,(~-,;\'j'r=~)---. ' --71 _ _.=:_:-: ~J c<l/,----,1-, -
c, --:i;;_17·; , ? ,--:,y ;· --,..1 ;;>.,... -, 1_ , •"+'L l/.r<',1'f'Y-V
/J , '7 '--'/ '/ i~ 1/'k ">-
1-
---------
______ I _____ ------------------•----------
--~--1 ~--_:--_ -===r==---------
I .w1-I ---------~-===-~;q~]> 1· -~f '.'y/ I_>==~=-I~'------t==-,~-
---------1~-----~ ~--
-------I I -------
~«-yt. ==c,=_~r:=--------r------·
,:~, '?) ~-~'}/--, ---1~:,~---
~--+--~ --·-1 I .. ----
·-·--cc-c• ---z!~T-c"-,; I _,;, --
----+---!---:~~/~~~}~ .. + ~ ~+~ ~-
I I ---+---+---~---.k~::tT 'f rJ-_, , ___ _ , ~-::;;; ,, " ;,,;-'f l' /' f"----~I
I i
I; ~,77 <;,-•,.-y✓-I.Lj -~--ll·-~:~,-Ef--.------
0 9 71V ..... , .,_ 11''·-"·· '1/ ~-'!'' I -,·
I .J / / ,, +.,J , -✓-• __ _
---+----i-----j--·1 i
·-;,;· ~J I : .. , , C
L·,,1_; -t'. '?,1 .. : __ _:,·1 0/
·;:,~ -._,-2,-/~1--.s-.:..__<_1_1---73~---..s ~
----+----+-,f-,,y cf c,---"'..l
I I I I .. ------------------
. 1·-------I ----·-:-1____ ----· -------
___ .. __________________________ I _________ I _ ... ________ __
----.. . -----··---·----i --'~ ...
_______ _!
I
------------__ I i ______ 1---1---
-----1----r----.·-~1-... ~-=~--=--l=_· ·--·------·
----~I___ I ! --------•
____ I _______ :~= I __ =•~---~~=-~------
1 l _ __,_ _ __j __ _
.,1 -----+---f---'------'------------------
----l-----+----1----1----+----I I I ----+--+----+---'-----1,--
/1 , .. , .. '.1 ); ~"! ' o ✓ :C.,L 1/ ,. ?7""...c--1 .,,-
---1---·-~-<;-+; r~1--;J~--+---,.,~ f; ,'--1,-w'I ./ ---1-----t----[.._ _ ___! ___ ·--·F
r~ / :"!t.rJ 'i ,-,+t. cl
H' .. . , ..... ;:
,
~j}~
-~
"i!.
, -t~,t
,{,:,,·
'"':'"·
,._;.
J..'
d;
-":;
; I
'(•
·" ,.
,;
" ' ,f'
~!-~'
t·'.i-~.f-i: !ll:
---·1---~fV\/\--'1 -~_½_v..:,-4-__ __lj __ /:-i~cf-:,,;..-:,._;./,>~--11----------------{.,,,_/1',. ., I ----------
-"~·----'··-•-"--f''~( ~._,L·----1-----l-----
-------------
-------------1
__ I
-~ -------I -i-----
1 -----
-----~,-----------· ----------!-----
-------r------
1
-~~---i-·----l=---·--/ ___ .!_ ----
I I
1 !_
------------
I
I
,');, ,-1.L • i( [ / I -----~ -!7'. ----·-:---·---f'"1"""
. / =:= ~-'-~"---____ 2.. ___ '_'-_1,_·_,_,_,.,,_~_----\1=========:========= s:.,c:,,.,~/✓,., __ ..5,.., /, /:..1 "':Jc-·~----·I~ ____ , ___ _
. __ A,;i_J:f-<_ *7_!:.L.e}.o_tl,;,t: ___ ~I ____ ,_ __ _
__ :¾: _RkY"-A: ____ _k,,_,.,~..,,J ~ i J /2,.::. ___ , ___ _
j I I -----'-'.,~'--. ,«~,t ~,,.JI_£'..._ ____ ,:,,i,,.,-f t'<.i_t______c'f 1-11 ____ _
___ N1d_ ,f,Wj Lu..,,r:JI,_ ----+----l---·-
----r~..-::-__ C._'=._(~_.flu_·f:5.=__/ __ ··-1-----f-----------
_____ )j,. __ >.;,,'I _ _!,_/,._,,_) ~,-.--:;;l-,--:____~c.~~-,-c"~•J~---l._,_:o,,-~----
______ :"-':>.0 -·--__ _!_________ _ ___ [ _____ 1----
=---~_i--<1·--~-c---<----j~-------_, ---,:::-,2::SJ L_
I ______ -~,c---=----==-----====='1 _____ ,. ___ _
. -~::::o------:----~---~ ---i . -I -._, ------. --· ----
1 I -:w_._:_--D ~~~---
1 !-U-'f<l 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE,
TO,
FROM,
RE,
May 11, 1994
File
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer
North Carolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
Private Well Data for Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia/ Gaston County, North Carolina
NCO 986 175 644
On October 14, 1993 I talked to Mr. W.L. Godwin, 2231 Davis Park Road about
the construction of his well. Mr. Godwin stated that his well is 6 inches in
diameter and is approximately 70 feet deep.
On October 14, 1993 I talked to Mrs. Pauline Philbeck, 2301 Davis Park Road
about the construction of her well. Mrs. Philbeck did not know any in~ormation
about her well.
On October 14, 1993 I talked to Mrs. Doris Corella, 2403 Davis Park Road
about the construction of her well. Mrs. Corella did not know any information
about her well.
On October 14, 1993 I talked to Mr. Charles May, 2419 Davis Park Road about
the construction of his well. Mr. May stated that his well is 6 inches in
diameter and is approximately 187 feet deep.
On October 14, 1993 I talked to Mr. Cregg Bess about the contaminated well
which previously served the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision. Mr. Bess stated that the
well is 6 inches in diameter and is approximately 150 feet deep. The system the
well supplied has 26 hook-ups.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IJNITED STATES ENVIRC>l<t-:PITi,~ PRO'.:EC ':ION AGENCY
RE:;~i0;1 ::·1
En'✓iror_rnerLtal S(::·v::.,::.Es :C,:·_vision
College Static,n F:oad, i,cre1s, Ca. 30613
DATE: 03/ l5/'l4
S"JE-JEC'.': Re:,ul :s
9L-Q2,\4
of :?urgeable Otganic A.nalysi s;
DAVIS PARK RC TCE SI
G.\STONiA NC
CASE NO: 21:,59
F'R,JM:~har.les H. Hooper ~\vC, LS
Chie~, :~abora:ory Eve~uatic,11/C!1Jal.ity A:;s~rance Section
TO: PAT DEROSA (NC)
RECEIVED
MAR 2 9 1994
SUPERFUNO SECTION I
Atta::t.~ed arE~ th,~ r(~Sults c,f e_n3lysi; c,f :;amplE:; collected as part of
the s~bjecc pro_jecc.
As z1 rE!Suit of ~he Qu,3lity Assur·anc,~ l!av~ew, certain data quE1lifiers
may have bee,n p.laced on tl-.e date,. ,\t1.aclt,ac is a DATA QUALIFIER
R:3:PORT which e>:plains the ree.sor1s t.hat. · th•=::e qu3l :~fie rs were required.
If yJu jave any qt1estlor1s please cc,11tt1ct me.
ATTACHMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 21559 Project Number 94-0244 SAS Number
Site ID. Davis Park Rd TCE Site, Gastonia, NC
Affected Sample
Volatiles
82565
82566
82566,82567
82567
82568
82571, 82572
82575
Compound or Fraction
Flag
UsedReason
chloroform J
acetone J
1,1,1-trichloroethane J
benzene J
trichloroethene J
1,1,1-trichloroethane J
1,2-dichloroethene,total J
<quantitation limit
erratic response factor
<quantitation limit
<quantitation limit
<quantitation limit
<quantitation limit
<quantitation li1nit
2.
- - -- - - -- - - --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
**********"**********"'*"***"** PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82569 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL • • • PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA
--- -
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC ..
•• .. SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: 001-50 COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1105 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• SAS NO. D. NO.· FC81
--03/14/94
• • • ... •• .. .. •• .. CASE NO.· 21559 *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U CHLOROMETHANE 12U BROMOMETHANE
12U VINYL CHLORIDE 12U CHLOROETHANE 12U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
12U ACETONE 12U CARBON DISULFIDE 12U 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE 12U 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 12U CHLOROFORM 12U 1·. 2-D I CHLOROETHANE 12U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 12U 1 ,1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 12U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
12U 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE 12U CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 12U 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE 12U BENZENE 12U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U BROMOFORM 12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 12U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
12U 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 12U TOLUENE 12U CHLOROBENZENE 12U ETHYL BENZENE 12U STYRENE 12U TOTAL XYLENES 15 PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- - - - --- - - - - -- -- -
..c::
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82566 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI •• STATION ID: 002-SB
***•····· .. ••****"**"'""**"'"*"'* PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: H ZINN CITY: GASTONIA ST: NC COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1010 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.· FC78
03/14/94
• * • ". * ..
•• .. •• .. •• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.:
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 120J 12U 12U 12U 38 12U 12U 12U SJ 12U 12U
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE( 1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
12U 12U 20 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 20U 12U 79 12U 20U 12U 210 14
1 ,2-DJCHLOROPROPANE CJS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1 ,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1 ,3-DJCHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1, 1 ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPL!NG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION .
-
-- - - - -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82567 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION JD: 003-SB
--- - - -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS. GA. --- -
* * * * • • * * * * ••• * * * * * * * * *****"***"'"'***"'** SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: FC79
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC 01/25/94 1025 STOP: 00/00/00
- -
03/14/94 ... .. •• .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.: *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U lOOU 12U 12U 12U 260 12U 12U 12U 7J 12U 12U
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l. 1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 1 .2-DJCHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1 .1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
12U 1.2-DJCHLOROPROPANE 12U CJS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 17 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRJCHLOROETHYLENEJ 12U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 12U 1.1.2-TRJCHLOROETHANE
2J BENZENE 12U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U BROMOFORM 12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 12U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 12U 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 230 TOLUENE 12U CHLOROBENZENE 45 ETHYL BENZENE 12U STYRENE 330 TOTAL XYLENES 19 PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTAT!ON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
-- ------ - - --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... .. .. .. ..
"'***"'*"**"'* * *"'* ....... ""'"' "*"'"'** PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82568 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RO TCE SI STATION ID: 004-SB
• •• PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
0. NO.: FC80
---
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC
-
01/25/94 1045 STOP: 00/00/00
--03/14/94
• • • ... .. .. .. .. .. .. CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO. *** * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * ••• * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * **"' UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U CHLOROMETHANE 12U BROMOMETHANE 12U VINYL CHLORIDE 12U CHLOROETHANE 12U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 12U ACETONE 12U CARBON DISULFIDE 12U 1 .1-0ICHLOROETHENE(l,1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U 1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE 38 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 12U CHLOROFORM 12U 1 .2-0ICHLOROETHANE 12U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 12U 1 . 1 , 1-TR I CHLOROETHANE 12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 12U BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
12U 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U CIS-1.3-0ICHLOROPROPENE 4J TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 12U OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 12U 1. 1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
12U BENZENE 12U TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U BROMOFORM 12U METHYL !SOBUTYL KETONE 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 12U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 12U 1 ,1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 46 TOLUENE 12U CHLOROBENZENE 12U ETHYL BENZENE 12U STYRENE 100 TOTAL XYLENES 18 PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
--- - - --- - ---- -- - --
_j
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT *** * * * * * * * * • * * * * $ * * * * * * T ? * :t * * :t * * * * •• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82566 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI •• STATION ID: 002-SB •• CASE. NO.: 21559 SAS NO.:
400JN 1000JN 600JN 500JN BOOJN 300JN 400JN 2000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
TRIMETHYLHEXANE DECANE ETHYLMETHYLHEPTANE TRIMETHYLBENZENE UNDECANE METHYL(METHYLETHYL)BENZENE ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE 3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
**"'*"*******"'**""'***"'****"*"' PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: H ZINN CITY: GASTONIA ST: NC COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1010 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO. FC78 MD NO:
03/14/94
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• ..
•••FOOTNOTES*•• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT·NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
- --- - - -- - - - -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. - -----03/14/94
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT **"***"' * * • * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * ' . . ... .. .. .. .. ..
... ..
" .. ..
"
* * * * • * * • • * * • * * * • * * * • * * * * * * • * * * * PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82567 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
STATION ID: 003-SB CASE.NO.: 21559 SAS NO.
4000J 600JN 2000JN 700JN 500JN
ANALYTiCAL RESULTS UG/KG
5 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE TRIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS) UNDECANE METHYL(METHYLETHYL)BENZENE
' ' PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: D. NO. FC79
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC 01 /25/94 1025 MD NO: STOP: 00/00/00
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
-- ---- --- ---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. ---- --03/14/94
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ... .. .. .. .. ..
•• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82568 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI •• STATION ID: 004-SB •• CASE.NO.: 21559 SAS NO.
200JN 600JN 200JN 400JN 600J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE TR!METHYLBENZENE (3 ISOMERS) DIETHYLBENZENE ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS) 3 UNINDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: H ZINN CITY: GASTONIA ST: NC COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1045 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.· FC80 MD NO:
•••FOOTNOTES•** •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- - - - --- - ---- - -- -
C,
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT *** * * ••• * ~ * * •• * * •• * * •• * * * * * * * * * * * * * ********* * * * * * * * * * * * *
•• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82573 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI •• STATION ID: 001-PW
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: FC85
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC 01 /25/94 1445 STOP: 00/00/00
03/14/94 ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. CASE NO. : 21559 SAS NO.·
*** * *. * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * • * * * * * *. UG/L ANAL VT I CAL RESUUS UG/L ANAL VT I CAL RESULTS
...
lOU CHLOROMETHANE 10U BROMOMETHANE 10U VINYL CHLORIDE 10U CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE
10U ACETONE lOU CARBON DISULFIDE 10U 1 .. 1-DICHLOROETHENE( 1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ lOU 1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE 10U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) ,au CHLOROFORM lOU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE 10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE ,au 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ,au CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ,au BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
lOU 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE lOU CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE ,au TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10U 1. 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U BENZENE ' ,au TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM ,au METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE ,au METHYL BUTYL KETONE IOU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
10U 1 .1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1 OU TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE lOU STYRENE IOU TOTAL XYLENES
••*FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
\
a ::;;,---------- -- - - - --- --- -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *"****······""'**** •• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82574 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI •• STATION ID: 002-PW ..
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC
01 /25/94 1540 STOP: 00/00/00
03/14/94
• • • ... .. •• .. ••
•• CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO. D. NO.: FC86 ** *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
,au CHLOROMETHANE lOU BROMOMETHANE lOU VINYL CHLORIDE ,au CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE lOU ACETONE ,au CARBON DISULFIDE lOU 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(l ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ,au 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE ,au 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) lOU CHLOROFORM lOU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE ,au 1. 1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
lOU 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10U CIS-1 .3-DJCHLOROPROPENE lOU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) ,au DJBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1 OU 1 . 1 . 2-TR I CHLOROETHANE lOU BENZENE 10U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM lOU METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1. 1 ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
10U TOLUENE ,au CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE 10U STYRENE 10U TOTAL XYLENES
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- - - --- - --------SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... ***"'*"'**"'***•···· .......... *•**""** PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82570 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RO TCE SI STATION ID: 003-PW
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.: FC82
BY: H ZINN ST: NC 1210 STOP: 00/00/00
-03/14/94 ... .. ..
** • • ..
.. .. .. .. .. *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.·
lOU CHLOROMETHANE lOU BROMOMETHANE lOU VINYL CHLORIDE lOU CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE lOU ACETONE lOU CARBON DISULFIDE lOU 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ lOU 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE lOU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) lOU CHLOROFORM lOU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE lOU 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10U BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
10U 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10U CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10U 1 ,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU BENZENE 10U TRANS-1 ,3-0ICHLOROPROPENE
lOU BROMOFORM 10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE lOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 10U 1 .1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 10U TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE 10U STYRENE 10U TOTAL XYLENES
•••FOOTNOTES•** •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
.. --- - - ------SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. --- - - -
03/14/94
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
•• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82575 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI •• STATION ID: 004-PW ..
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: H ZINN •• CITY: GASTONIA ST: NC *' COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1600 STOP: 00/00/00 •• ..
•* CASE NO.· 21559 SAS NO. D. NO.: FC87 •• *** * * :f. :f. * :f. :f. :f. * * * * :f. :f. * * * :f. :f. * * * * :f. :f. * :f. * * :f. :f. :f. * * :f. :f. * T :f. :f. :f. * * * * :f. :f. * * :f. :f. * * * :f. * *:,: :f. :f. :f. * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE lOU BROMOMETHANE 10U VINYL CHLORIDE lOU CHLOROETHANE 10U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 10U ACETONE lOU CARBON DISULFIDE 10U 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE 2J 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) lOU CHLOROFORM lOU 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE lOU 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
10U 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10U CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 38 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10U 1 .1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U BENZENE lOU TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM 10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE lOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
10U 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
10U TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE 10U STYRENE lOU TOTAL XYLENES
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
- - ---- ------ - -- -- -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *********"**•* **" "'** "*" "'"** •• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82576 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI
•• STATION ID: 005-PW
PROG.ELEM: SSf CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTED
COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.: fC88
BY: H ZINN ST: NC 1650 STOP: 00/00/00
03/14/94
• • • ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.·
10U CHLOROMETHANE lOU BROMOMETHANE lOU VINYL CHLORIDE lOU CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE lOU ACETONE 10U CARBON DISULFIDE lOU 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE lOU 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 1 OU CHLOROFORM lOU 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHANE 10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE lOU 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
lOU 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE lOU CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11 TRJCHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE lOU 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU BENZENE IOU TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE lOU BROMOFORM lOU METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE lOU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
lOU 1 .1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
IOU TOLUENE IOU CHLOROBENZENE lOU ETHYL BENZENE IOU STYRENE lOU TOTAL XYLENES
""**FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATJON LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
--- - - -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ----- -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
*** * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • • * • " " * * "
- ---
" • * • • • * * * * • *
- -
03/14/94
• • • ... .. ., PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82571 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI ** STATION ID: 006-PW
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC 01/25/94 1240 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• .. •• •• CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.: 0. NO.: FC83 ** *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
!OU CHLOROMETHANE lOU BROMOMETHANE IOU VINYL CHLORIDE IOU CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE IOU ACETONE lOU CARBON DISULFIDE lOU 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU 1 ,1-DJCHLOROETHANE lOU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) lOU CHLOROFORM !OU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE 5J 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
lOU 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE lOU CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 51 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE IOU 1 ,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
IOU BENZENE IOU TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM 10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE lOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE 18 TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ lOU 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE lOU TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE lOU ETHYL BENZENE lOU STYRENE lOU TOTAL XYLENES
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •II-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
----------------

-
-
0---
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 03/14/94
*** ••• * ••• * • * * • * * • * * * * ••• * * * * • * * • * * * • * * * * * * * * • • * * * • * * • • * • * * • • * * • * ... ., .. .. ••
•• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82577 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: H ZINN
CITY: GASTONIA ST: NC
** STATION ID: 101-PW COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 0725 STOP: 00/00/00 .. '* CASE NO.· 21559 SAS NO.: D. NO.: FC89 u
*** * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * *. * * * * * * ••• * * • * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * • * * • * * * *. * * * * * * * ***
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE
10U BROMOMETHANE
10U VINYL CHLORIDE
10U CHLOROETHANE 10U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
10U ACETONE
10U CARBON DISULFIDE 10U 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
10U 1. 1-DICHLOROETHANE
10U 1 .2-D!CHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
10U CHLOROFORM
10U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE
10U 1 ,1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
10U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
10U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
10U 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
10U CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE ,au TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
10U 1 ,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
10U BENZENE ,au TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE
10U BROMDFORM
10U METHYL !SOBUTYL KETONE ,au METHYL BUTYL KETONE
10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
10U 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
10U TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE
10U ETHYL BENZENE
,OU STYRENE ,au TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
----- -- - --- - -- -- -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT *** * * * • * * * * • * * •• * * * * * * * * * * • * * * •• * * * ••****"** "'*****"'*********"'* •• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82578 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI ,. STATION ID: 104-PW
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
D. NO.; FC90
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC 01/25/94 1700 STOP: 00/00/00
03/14/94
* * * *." .. ..
•• ..
•• ..
•• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.
10U CHLOROMETHANE 10U BROMOMETHANE 10U VINYL CHLORIDE 10U CHLOROETHANE 10U METHYLENE CHLORIDE
10U ACETONE 10U CARBON DISULFIDE 10U 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE 10U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 11 CHLOROFORM 10U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE 10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 10U 1. 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
10U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10U CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10U 1, 1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U BENZENE 10U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM 10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 10U 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
10U TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE 10U STYRENE 10U TOTAL XYLENES
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NA!-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
----- --PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT - - -- -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. - -----... * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * • * * *"*"'"**"*****"**" .. .. .. .. ..
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82565 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STAT!Ot, ID: 105-PW
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.·
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
D. NO.· FC77
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC 01/25/94 0730 STOP: 00/00/00
03/14/94 ... .. .. .. .. ..
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE 10U BROMOMETHANE 10U VINYL CHLORIDE 10U CHLOROETHANE 10U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 10U ACETONE 10U CARBON DISULFIDE 10U 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE 10U 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 3J CHLOROFORM 10U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE 10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 10U 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
10U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10U CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10U 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U BENZENE 10U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM 10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
10U 1 ,1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
10U TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE
10U STYRENE iOU TOTAL XYLENES
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES"-'** •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- - - - --- -- - - - --- -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ...
** ** .. ..
••
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82572 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: 106-PW
CASE NO.· 21559 SAS NO.·
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.: FC84
BY: H ZINN ST: NC 1250 STOP: 00/00/00
-03/14/94 ... .. .. .. .. ..
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANAL YT! CAL RESULTS
lOU CHLOROMETHANE lOU BROMOMETHANE lOU VINYL CHLORIDE
lOU CHLOROETHANE 1 OU METHYLENE CHLORIDE ,au ACETONE
lOU CARBON DISULFIDE lOU 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHANE ,au 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 1 OU CHLOROFORM 10U 1 .2-D!CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE 5J 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***REMARKS***
1 OU 1 , 2-DI CHLOROPROPANE lOU CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 50 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10U 1 ,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
10U BENZENE lOU TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE lOU BROMOFORM 10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 17 TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1, 1 ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 10U TOLUENE ,au CHLOROBENZENE lOU ETHYL BENZENE 10U STYRENE lOU TOTAL XYLENES
•••FOOTNOTES*** •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. CQMPOUND MAY OR MAY"NOT BE PRESENT. RESAM~LING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-