NCD981021157_19910814_New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit_FRBCERCLA RI_Draft Remedial Investigation Report-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
g
I
11
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV
345 COURTLAND STREET. N.E.
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30365
AUG l t 1991
4WD-NCRS
Ms. Charlotte Jesneck
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
401 Oberlin Road
Raleigh, NC 27605
RE: Review and Comment on Draft Remedial Investigation Report
for the New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superfund site
Dear Ms. Jesneck:
Enclosed are three (3) copies of the above referenced document as prepared by
the Environmental services Division. The draft Remedial Investigation (RI)
report is based data collecte4 during the Preliminary Investigation/site
Assessment (PI/SA), the removal action .conducted in November-December 1990,
and the recently completed RI field work. Field work for the RI was done
between April 8 and April 18, 1991.
Please review this draft report. In order to keep this site on schedule, I
would appreciate receiving your comments by no later than September 9, 1991.
If you are unable to get your comments to me by this date, please let me know
when you will be able to submit your comments.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
sincerely yours,
Remedial Project Manager
enclosures
cc: Lee Crosby, NCDEHNR (w/o encl.)
William Meyer, NCDEHNR (w/o enc~.)
Printed on Recycled Paper
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
m
•
m
DRAtf
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
BURN-PIT SITE
NEW HANOVER COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared By:
£PA -REGION IV
ATLANTA, GA.
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV
ENVIRONMENTAL cqMPLIANCE BRANCH
ENVIRONMENTAL S:ERVICES DIVISION
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION
AUGUST 1991
~EPA
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ....
1.1 Work Plan Overview
1.2 Site Status
2.0 INITIAL SITE EVALUATION
2.1 Site Description
2.1.1 Location .... .
2.1.2 History .... .
2.1.3 Physical Features
2.2 Removal/RI Soil Sampling
2.3 Enforcement Profile
2.4 Preliminary Remediation Goals
3.0 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
3.1 Geology ...... .
3.1.1 Regional Geology .
3.1.2 Site-Specific Geology
3.2 Hydrogeology ...... .
. •·
3.2.1 Regional Surface Water Features
3.2.2 Site-Specific Surface Water Features
3.2.3 Regional Groundwater Features
3.2.4 Site-Specific Groundwater Features
4.0 SAMPLING RESULTS AND METHODOLOGY
4.1 Methodology ........ .
4.1.1 Temporary Piezometers
4.1.2 Temporary Monitoring Wells
4.1.3 Permanent Monitoring Wells
4.2 Soil Sampling ...... .
4.2.1 Removal/RI Soil Sampling
4.2.2 RI Soil Sampling
4.3 Waste Sampling ..... .
4.4 Aquifer Test ...... .
4.5 Quality Assurance Sampling
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.0 REFERENCES .......... .
1
1
2
3
·3
3
3
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
8
10
11
11
11
11
12
13
14
14
14
14
15
16
17
I
I
I
I
I
I
R
D
I
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
I
D
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: FIGURES
APPENDIX B: TABLES
APPENDIX C: PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS
APPENDIX D: WEU. I.DGS
APPENDIX E: AQUIFER CHARACTERISTICS
APPENDIX F: RAW DATA
D
D
D
I
n
I
D
n
D
0
n
I
I
g
I
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Section No. 1.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 1
The New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Site (New Hanover Site), is located in
New Hanover County, Wilmington, North Carolina. The age of the burn pit is
uncertain. Aerial photography dated October 26, 1965, indicates that the site
was being used at that time for fire fighter training. A small pit is visible
near the center of the site in this imagery. Later photography indicates that
this small pit was located on the site ,of the burn pit which was constructed
sometime prior to September 15, 1968. This larger burn pit was in use until 1979
by the Cape Fear Technical Institute and the Wilmington Fire Department for fire
training purposes. Jet fuel (JP-4), drafnage from petroleum fuel storage tanks,
kerosene, and oil were used to fuel the fires, and water, carbon dioxide, and dry
chemicals were used to extinguish the fires. Sorbent materials from river spill
cleanups were also disposed of in the pit sometime prior to 1982. The U.S.
Customs Service also burned. confiscated drugs in the pit on at least one
occasion.
In 1985, the county applied for a permit for land application of oil sludge and
water from the burn pit, but the application was denied. The New Hanover County
Department of Engineering conducted sampling in 1985 that revealed heavy metals
and volatile organic hydrocarbons (VOC's) in the pit sludge. In 1986, the North
Carolina Division of Health Services sampled the bottom sludge layer of the pit
and soil outside the pit. The State's sampling effort detected heavy metals,
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's) and VOC's. The site was subsequently
proposed for the National Priorities List (NPL).
This remedial investigation (RI) was conducted by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA), Region IV, Environmental Services Division (ESD),
Environmental Compliance Branch (ECB), Hazardous Waste Section (HWS).
1.1 Work Plan Overview
This remedial investigation report (RI) is organized as follows:
• Section 1. 0 -The New Hanover Site is introduced and the RI• s status is
outlined.
• Section 2.0 -The Site's history is summarized, and the site is described in
terms of existing onsite conditions,.
• Section 3.0 -The regional and sitl specific geology and hydrogeology are
described.
• Section 4.0
• Section 5.0
• Appendix A
• Appendix B
The analytical results are presented and discussed.
Conclusions and recommendations are made for further work.
All referenced figures1 are included here for convenience.
All referenced tables are included here for convenience.
• Appendix C -The report containing the Preliminary Remediation Goals for the
site are submitted.
0
D
D
D
D
D
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section No. 1.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 2
• Appendix D
• Appendix E
Well logs and well construction details are presented.
Results of the aquifer pump test are presented.
• Appendix F Raw data sheets.
1.2 Site Status
The New Hanover Site was proposed for inclusion on the NPL in March 1989.
According to CERCLA, EPA must, when feasible, identify potentially responsible
parties (PRP' s) who may be liable for fu,ture site cleanup. The following PRP' s
have been identified:
• New Hanover County (owner of the airport)
• City of Wilmington (trained firefighters at the site)
• Cape Fear Technical Institute (trained firefighters at the site)
• Army Corps of Engineers (constructed the site)
• United States Customs Service (burned confiscated drugs at the site)
• United States Air Force (trained firefighters at the site)
EPA has given approval to the PRP's to initiate removal activities at the site.
Waste materials were removed from the burn pit, along with contaminated surface
and subsurface soils. Contaminated surface and subsurface soils were also
removed from the fire training areas. In addition, structures associated with
firefighter training activities were dismantled and removed, including the fuel
supply tank and its associated underground piping system, a railroad tank car,
automobile bodies and an aircraft mockup. Excavated areas were backfilled to
grade with clean soil.
I
I The prior removal of wastes and contaminated soils significantly altered the
scope of the RI/FS. Characterization of the site consisted of determining what
residual contamination remained in groundwater and site soils, and describing the
site specific geology and hydrogeology.
n
u
n
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.0 INITIAL SITE EVALUATION
2.1 Site Description
2.1.1 Location
Section No. 2.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 3
The New Hanover Site is located on Gardner Road 500 feet west of the New Hanover
County Airport in New Hanover County, approximately 1.5 miles north of
Wilmington, North Carolina at 34"16'29" latitude and 77°54'55" longitude (see
Figure 2-1). The approximately 1,500 square foot burn pit was located near the
center of a 4-acre plot (see Figure 2-2). Land use in the vicinity is
commercial, industrial, and residential. There are rental car maintenance
facilities, a closed sawmill/lumberyard, and a trucking company to the east of
the site. The closest residential areas to the site are estimated to be
approximately 0.22 miles to the west of _the site. This area is separated from
the site by a road, railroad tracks, and a wooded area.
2.1.2 History
The airport was built in the 1920's as a civil air facility owned by New Hanover
County. In 1942, the Department of Defense requisitioned the airport for the
U.S. Army Air Corps. In 1947 and 1948, the Army deeded the airport back to the
county. Formerly known as Bluthenthal Airport, in 1970 the facility was renamed
the New Hanover County Airport. The date of construction of the original burn
pit is unknown, but the current pit was constructed in 1968 and used until 1979
by the Air ,Force, Cape Fear Technical Institute, and local industries for
firefighter training purposes. Prior to this the site had been used as a
military hospital. The Wilmington Fire; Department also used the burn pit for
firefighter training purposes during theiyears 1968 to 1974, estimating that 100
to 500 gallons of jet fuel were burned in the pit daily during this period. Jet
fuel, gasoline, petroleum storage tank bottoms, fuel oil, kerosene, sorbent
materials from oil spill cleanups, and on at least one occasion, confiscated
marijuana were burned in the pit. \later was the primary fire extinguishing
agent; however, carbon dioxide and dry.chemicals were also used. The county
applied for a permit to close out the burn pit by land application of the pit
contents, but this request was denied by the state (1,2).
A survey for hazard ranking purposes was conducted at the site on January 9,
1987. EPA contacted the PRP's on October 7, 1988, seeking information concerning
the identity and/or quantity of materials generated, treated, stored, disposed
of, or transported to the New Hanover Site. Draft enforcement-consent orders
were negotiated with the PRP's through three to four rounds of correspondence.
These attempts were not successful. The New Hanover Site was then proposed for
inclusion to the NPL on March 31, 1989.
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) conducted a health
assessment of the New Hanover Site in March 1989. The Health Assessment
concluded that the site is of potential 'public concern because of risk to human
health resulting from possible exposure to hazardous substances at concentrations
that may result in adverse human health.effects (3).
D
D
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section No. 2.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 4
The USEPA set Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRG's) for the site in January,
1991. PRG's were set for various inorganic and organic contaminants found at the
site, and these PRG's were used in determining the scope and nature of the field
and analytical work to be performed at the site. PRG's are subject to change,
and may be modified at any time during the•RI/FS process. The PRG's are included
as Appendix C.
2.1.3 Physical Features
The burn pit was of earthen construction, 30 feet by 50 feet in dimension,
surrounded by a 3 foot berm, located near the center of a 4-acre open field. The
bottom of the pit did not extend below the land surface. On March 19, 1990, the
county repaired a break in the berm around the burn pit. The height of the berm
was increased using soil removed from an area approximately 50 feet northeast of
the pit. There were two valves, concealed within the berm, at the bottom of the
pit on the north side; one for draining water and the other for adding fuel to
the pit. Most of the liquid in the pit was water (1,2). Water from the pit was
allowed to flow onto the land surface. The bottom of the pit and the soil
immediately surrounding the pit were black with characteristics similar to tar
(1). Soil 30 feet west of the pit and 50 feet north of the pit was dry, but
showed evidence of prolonged periods of standing water. The apparent source of
this water was drainage and/or overflow from the pit.
In addition to the burn pit, there are other areas where contaminants may have
been present as a result of training activities. These include:
• an old automobile,
• a railroad tank car,
• an aircraft mock-up made of 55 gallon drums,
• the fuel supply tank,
• the pipeline from the supply tank to each burn area, and
• two stained soil areas adjacent to the burn pit.
Several concrete block buildings (apparently constructed for the military
hospital), are located onsite. Only the, building used as the smoke house was
used in the training exercises.
The fuel distribution system consisted of an above ground storage tank and a
pipeline system. The fuel pipeline system was buried approximately 1 foot below
land surface. The pipeline extended from the storage tank northwest to a pipe
junction. The valve controlling flow to the burn pit was located at the
approximate midpoint along this segment of the pipeline. At the junction, valves
controlled flow to the three firefighter training areas.
In addition, a small amount of medical .waste (discarded syringes which were
apparently burned) was noted in the area of the aircraft mock-up during the
confirmation sampling (December, 1990). A manhole accessing the former
infirmary's septic tank was also located. The PRP's agreed to dispose of the
g
D
n
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section No. 2.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 5
medical waste as part of the removal plan; the contents of the septic tank were
investigated by USEPA as part of the RI.·
2.2 Removal/RI Soil Sampling
During November/December 1990 the PRP's performed a removal action on the waste
materials and contaminated surface and subsurface soils at the site. The tank
that was used to supply fuel to the burn pit and fire training areas along with
its associated piping and valve box were removed, along with surrounding soils.
The burn pit and fire training areas and their equipment were dismantled and
removed. Soil excavation/removal continued in these areas until either no visual
contamination remained or groundwater was encountered.
The soil sampling investigation was conducted as follows: Following the
excavation/removal activities, but prior to backfilling excavations to grade, 18
composite soil samples were collected from all excavated areas. These samples
were collected as surface soil samples,, but all samples collected were below
grade and thus reflect subsurface soil conditions at the site. Samples
representative of contaminated surface soils could not be collected because all
contaminated surface soils had been removed. Sampling locations were deliberate-
ly biased to reflect "worst case" site conditions to ensure that PRG's (cleanup
standards) were met or exceeded. Soil samples for VOA analysis were not
composited, but were collected as grab samples.
Two soil samples were collected at the points where surface drainage would leave
the site via culverts. As previously noted, there are no onsite surface waters
other ~han periodic wet areas. The perimeter drainage ditch is not a perennial
surface water feature but it does connect offsite to other surface water drainage
features. In addition, four groundwater samples were collected from temporary
monitoring wells.
2.3 Enforcement Profile
Enforcement activities are currently ongoing between EPA Region IV and the PRP' s.
Consent order negotiations were initiated in the fourth quarter of 1989, and, to
date, a satisfactory agreement with all PRP's involved has not been obtained.
The surface and subsurface soils cleanup, however, has been completed.
2.4 Preliminary Remediation Goals
Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRG's) have been developed for this site by the
Region IV Health Assessment Officer. The report issued is included as Appendix
C. These PRG's set chemical specific concentration goals for site contaminants
of concern for specific environmental media and land-use combinations. Table 2-
1, which is developed from the PRG's, summarizes the concentration goals for
contaminants of concern in groundwater, Table 2-2, summarizes the concentration
goal~ for contaminants of concern in soil .. The soil concentration goals are also
protective of the air pathway for contaminated surface soils.
g
n
D
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
3.0 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
3.1 Geology
3.1.1 Regional Geology
Section No. 3.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 6
The New Hanover Site is located in the northwest portion of New Hanover County,
north of Wilmington, North Carolina. New Hanover County is within the Coastal
Plain Physiographic Province. The major geomorphic features associated with the
county include beaches and barrier islands along the Atlantic Ocean, low relief
terraces, and dune hills lying east of the coast, and the Cape Fear and Northeast
Cape Fear Rivers. Generally, the sequence of rock types beneath New Hanover
County consists of unconsolidated and consolidated sedimentary rock of
predominantly coastal and marine origin that begin at land surface and
unconformably overlie crystalline rock at depth. Potable water supplies are
obtained from the relatively shallow sedimentary formations. Groundwater
occurring at greater depths is undeveloped due to saline conditions. Groundwater
flow associated with the fresh water aquifers beneath New Hanover County are
largely effected by topography, surface water features, and the geologic
structure (5).
A deep well drilled between Smith's Creek and the Northeast Cape Fear River
penetrated 1,109 feet of sedimentary rock prior to encountering a granite rock-
type associated with the crystalline rock. Other drilling activities in the
county document the crystalline rock as lying at depths as great as 1,540 feet.
The crystalline rocks consist of schist, gneiss, granite, and metamorphosed
volcanic rocks, all of which are typical of the rocks exposed at land surface
further to the west in North Carolina's Piedmont Physiographic Province. The top
of the crystalline rock is an erosion surface. Above this erosional surface 1 a
discontinuity in structure occurs. Thejcrystalline rock is estimated to date
from the Precambrian to Mississippian Age.
The sediments that overlie the erosiona,l contact are of late Cretaceous Age.
Sediments older than those of the late Cretaceous Age are absent beneath New
Hanover County, although the sediments of the Tuscaloosa Formation and Lower
Cretaceous Formations are prominent in other Coastal Plain areas of North
Carolina.
A geologic structure known as the Cape Fear Arch, roughly parallels the Cape Fear
River and runs southeast through New Hanover County. The arch is a broad gentle
uplift responsible for several geologic phenomena observed in New Hanover County,
including the lack of Lower Cretaceous sediments, the structure of the thick
Upper Cretaceous sediments and the thin veneer of Tertiary sediments (5).
3.1.2 Site-Specific Geology
Three test borings were drilled at the New Hanover Site prior to the installation
of the monitoring wells (Figure 3-1). The purpose of the test borings were to
identify the near surface geology and to identify the presence or absence of the
Castle Hayne Limestone, the Sandstone Aquifer, and/or a clay aquiclude which
I
n
D
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
u
Section No. 3.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 7
separates them (Figure 3-2). The first test boring (TB-1) was drilled to a depth
of 65 feet below land surface (bls). The other two test borings were terminated
at approximately 26 to 32 feet bls.
The upper 25 to 31 feet in the borings consisted of unconsolidated, fine grained,
quartz, sandy soils. A firm blue-gray clay unit was encountered below the
surficial sands from approximately 28 feet to a depth of 33 feet bls in TB-1 and
subsequently confirmed in three other borings at the site. This is described by
Bain (5) as a late Miocene unit which overlies the Castle Hayne limestone,
although he places its nearest occurence approximately two miles northeast of the
site. He goes on to state that the "silty part of the unit functions as a
hydraulic barrier (aquiclude) between the overlying water-table aquifer and the
underlying Castle Hayne aquifer near the seacoast". To determine the hydrologic
properties of this unit, a sample of the clay was taken using a Shelby tube.
This sample was then sealed with paraffin and submitted to a geotechnical
laboratory for analysis. The resulting USCS classification of the clay is CL,
sandy clay, with a liquid limit of 34 and a plasticity index of 12. The
permeability of the blue-gray clay unit was determined in the laboratory to be
2.03 x 10-7 cm/sec. Below the blue-gray clay unit in TB-1, were light gray,
medium to coarse grained quartz sand and clay lenses to a depth of approximately
60 feet bls. Hard, consolidated, sandy, phosphatic, fossiliferous limestone with
calcite filled fractures was encountered in TB-1 underlying these sand and clay
lenses. This limestone is believed to be the Castle Hayne limestone which,
according to published information (5) was thought to be absent from the site.
Table 3-1 presents the generalized geology for the New Hanover site.
3.2 Hydrogeology
3.2.1 Regional Surface Water Features
The Coastal Plain Physiographic Province is characterized by low relief land
forms consisting of rolling sand hills, salt marshes, tidal flats, shallow
sounds, barrier islands/beaches, and narrow inlets of geologically recent age.
Elevations in New Hanover County range from approximately 80 feet above mean sea
level (MSL) at the dune system lying east-southeast of Greenfield Lake to sea
level along the Atlantic Coast. Overall the land surface slopes slightly toward
the Atlantic Coast, the Cape Fear River, and the Northeast Cape Fear River. A
drainage divide that generally runs northeast directs surface water to either the
Cape Fear or Northeast Cape Fear Rivers which discharge to the Atlantic Ocean in
south New Hanover County, or directly toward the Atlantic Ocean through systems
of creeks, sounds, and inlets. Other surface water features include small
shallow sinkholes formed by dissolving ne,ar surface limestone and coquina beds,
where present. These features are most :common in the vicinity of the town of
Castle Hayne and south of Wilmington.
The higher elevations in New Hanover County represent the locations of 11 fossil
dunes" or "sand hills", generally located from Fort Fisher northward toward
Wilmington, and continuing to the Pender County line. These sand hills represent
previous beach sands that have been sifted by the wind to form sand dunes.
Because the process of dune formation te~ds to result in the sorting and
n
D
D
I
D
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section No. 3.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 8
accumulation of permeable surficial sand deposits, most of these areas do not
promote overland drainage or sheet runoff (5).
The study area of the New Hanover Site is topographically and hydraulically
bounded by Smith's Creek to the south and southwest, small tributaries to the
Northeast Cape Fear River to the north and northeast, and the Northeast Cape Fear
River to the west. Essentially, all ove'rland drainage that occurs within this
area is toward the Northeast Cape Fear River, which combines flow with the Cape
Fear River and eventually discharges to the Atlantic Ocean. From the site, it
is approximately 4,800 feet to the nearest topographically downgradient perennial
surface water feature, Smith's Creek. From this point, Smith's Creek meanders
to the Northeast Cape Fear River for an overland distance of approximately two
miles. From the point of its confluence with Smith's Creek, the Northeast Cape
Fear River flows southward for approximately two miles and combines with the Cape
Fear River. Flow continues southward for approximately 20 miles until the Cape
Fear River discharges to the Atlantic Oc_ean.
3.2.2 Site-Specific Surface Water Features
The intermittent surface water features in the immediate v1c1n1ty of the site
consist mainly of stormwater ditches that typically terminate in nearby swales,
and topographic depressions that apparently lose water through rapid infiltration
and evapotranspiration, as opposed to overland flow to perennial surface water
features.
The New Hanover Site is completely surrounded by elevated roads which form a berm
around the site. Outside of the elevated roads is a perimeter ditch. Although
perimeter ditches and drainage culverts are present, drainage from the Site
apparently either infiltrates or evaporates. The invert elevations of the two
drainage culverts at the site indicate only two locations where surface water
could leave the site from the perimeter ditches. There appears to be little or
no offsite surface water drainage.
3.2.3 Regional Groundwater Features
The occurrence, movement, and quality of groundwater beneath New Hanover County
is well documented for those aquifers that do not contain saline water. These
aquifers are restricted to the upper portion of the Pee Dee Formation, the Castle
Hayne Limestone, and the two series of undifferentiated deposits. Figure 3-2
presents a generalized hydrogeologic section across New Hanover County that
includes the subsurface features relevant to potable groundwater supplies.
The deepest geologic unit of significance is the silt and clay aquiclude situated
between the uppermost saline aquifer and the Sandstone Aquifer, all contained in
the Pee Dee Formation. This aquiclude, which is approximately 150 feet thick,
is present throughout New Hanover County. It is an unconsolidated greenish-gray
to dark gray, clayey, sandy silt containing glauconite, which is responsible for
a characteristic "salt and pepper" appearance.
Lying above the silt and clay aquiclude is the Sandstone Aquifer, the principal
freshwater aquifer in New Hanover County. The Sandstone Aquifer, which is
D
D
D
D
D
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section No. 3.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 9
laterally persistent throughout the central and eastern portions of the county,
is approximately 35 feet thick, except in locations where the unit is truncated
by erosional contacts with the undifferentiated sand deposits. The Sandstone
Aquifer generally dips to the southeast at approximately 14 feet per mile. The
aquifer is quartz sand with calcareous cement.
Lying above the Sandstone Aquifer is a clay aquiclude which marks the top of the
Pee Dee Formation in New Hanover County. As a result of erosion on its upper
surface, the clay aquiclude varies in thickness from absent to more than 50 feet.
Where present, the clay aquiclude is typically black and massive. However,
because recharge to the Sandstone Aquifer probably occurs through downward
migration, and the areas of greatest recharge coincide with high elevations of
the potentiometric surface, the clay aquiclude is likely to be semi-confining in
these high recharge zones.
The Castle Hayne Limestone ranges in thickness from absent to 80 feet, and is
believed to be absent for some of the northwest portions of New Hanover County,
including the vicinity of the site. Where present, the Castle Hayne Limestone
Formation is typically represented by a discontinuous, basal sandy shell
conglomerate occupying channels cut into the Pee Dee Formation, overlain by a
glauconitic shell limestone with interbedded sand, which are in turn overlain by
a "cap rock11 consisting of a dense, chalk-white siliceous limestone containing
phosphate at its base. The upper-most lithology associated with the Castle Hayne
Limestone is a light-green glauconitic mixture of shell fragments containing
bryozoans. The sandy shell portions of the Castle Hayne Limestone are the most
productive in terms of water supply; however, aquifer yields depend on the degree
to which the permeability has been increased by solutioning.
The sediments of each of the undifferentiated deposits vary greatly both
laterally and vertically. Along the coast, these sediments include fine-grained
deposits that act as an aquiclude and confine the Castle Hayne Limestone. To the
west, the Castle Hayne Limestone, where present, communicates with the
undifferentiated deposits and the aquifer is under water table conditions. The
contact between the undifferentiated dep9sits and the underlying formations is
erosional. The lower portion of the undifferentiated deposits may occupy former
stream channels and may contain reworked materials from underlying formations.
'
The undifferentiated deposits of late Tertiary Age are phosphatic sands, silts,
clays, and phosphatic limestones. In north central New Hanover County, these
Tertiary deposits include a gray to blue dense clay that thickens from
approximately 5 to 20 feet eastward. Small water supplies may be developed from
sands within the undifferentiated Tertiary deposits and moderate supplies from
localized occurrences of coquina.
The undifferentiated surface deposits also rest on an erosional contact and
consist of clay, sand, and marl. Although absent in the towns of Wilmington and
Castle Hayne, the deposits are as much as 70 feet thick at other locations. In
the northwestern one-third of New Hanover County, where the Castle Hayne
Limestone is absent, the undifferentiated surface deposits rest unconformably on
the Pee Dee Formation. Within these areas, the deposits include a basal sand
that is coarse and well sorted, occurs from sea level to approximately 30 feet
below sea level (BSL) and occupies the channels cut into the Pee Dee Formation.
The coarse sand is overlain by less permeable, finer-grained sediments such as
silts and clays. At and near land surface, a thin veneer of sands may be present
n
D
D
n
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section No. 3.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 10
in the form of terraces, related beach sands, and sand dunes (5).
Groundwater in the undifferentiated deposits is under water table conditions; the
water table surface approximates topography. Recharge occurs from rainfall,
predominantly in the broad areas between streams. It is estimated that 90
percent of the precipitation effectively recharges the undifferentiated deposits.
3.2.4 Site-Specific Groundwater Features
The upper water bearing formation is under water table or atmospheric conditions.
The water table elevation at the site is approximately 27 to 28 feet above NGVD-
29. Typical depths to the water table ranged from approximately 2.3 to 3.8 feet
bls. Figure 3-3, 3-4, and 3-5 present the static water table elevations observed
at the site. Ground water elevations near the middle of the site appear to
indicate a somewhat mounded water table condition. This may be due to the recent
removal activities which may have altered the hydraulic properties of the site
soils at the former pits. The estimated hydraulic gradient across the site was
observed to ranged between 0.0008 ft/ft on 04/09/91 to 0.00002 ft/ft on 05/07/91.
The ground water flow direction is generally to the southwest.
No wells were installed below the blue-gray clay unit during this investigation.
However, based on the thickness and the permeability of the clay unit, there
appears to be an effective seal which separates the ground water above the clay
unit from the ground water below the clay unit. The ground water below this clay
would be termed under confined conditions.
D
D
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.0 SAMPLING RESULTS AND METHODOLOGY
4.1 Methodology
Section No. 4.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 11
The contaminant plume was defined using the following techniques. Temporary
piezometers were installed and the groundwater gradient established. Using this
information, six temporary monitoring wells were installed and sampled for VOA's
to determine the extent of the VOA contaminant plume. These samples were
analyzed and reported to field personnel within 36 hours. Final placement of the
permanent monitoring wells was based upon study of the analytical and gradient
data.
The horizontal and vertical location of the piezometers, temporary and permanent
monitoring wells and observation wells were determined from a control survey for
the site. In addition, the top of casing (ToC) elevations were also vertically
located for use with the water level measurements. Vertical locations are
referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD29) and
horizontal locations are referenced to the site coordinate system.
Soil samples were collected using stainless steel hand augers and glass pans.
All sampling and sample handling were performed in accordance with the
Environmental Compliance Branch Standard Operating Procedures, February 1, 1991,
(ECBSOPQAM).
4.1.1 Temporary Piezometers
Eight temporary water level piezometers were installed to determine the hydraulic
gradient across the site prior to the installation of the temporary and permanent
monitoring wells. The piezometers consisted of a sufficient number of 3-foot
long by 3/4-inch diameter hollow steel rods with vertical slots on the lead rod
to intersect the water table. The rods were pushed into the water table and
water levels were allowed to stabilize for up to 24-hours to measure static water
table conditions. Water levels were measured using the chalk and steel tape
method. Figure 4-1 shows the locations of the temporary piezometers and the
results of the water level survey.
4.1.2 Temporary Monitoring Wells
As part of the soil sampling activities performed by USEPA in December 1990, four
groundwater samples were collected from temporary monitoring wells (Table 4-1,
Figure 4-2). Benzene was the sole contaminant noted at levels above those
specified in the PRG's. The PRG for benzene is currently 1 ug/1 in groundwater.
Sample BP-25, collected from a temporary well in the former pit area, contained
210 ug/1 of benzene. Sample BP-24, collected from a temporary well located
approximately 70 feet from the burn pit (in the presumed downgradient direction),
contained 8 ug/1 of benzene. Sample BP-23, another temporary well in the
presumed downgradient direction, contained no detectable benzene, as was the case
with sample BP-22, which was collected from a temporary well located in the
presumed upgradient direction.
n
D
n
I
D
D
I
D
D
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
Section No. 4.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 12
Using the results of the confirmation sampling and the temporary piezorneters,
seven temporary monitoring wells were installed prior to placement of the
permanent monitoring wells. The temporary monitoring wells consisted of a
sufficient number of 3-foot long by 3/4-inch diameter hollow steel rods with
vertical slots on the lead rod to intersect the water table. The rods were
pushed into the water table and the samples were collected and analyzed prior to
placement of the permanent monitoring wells. The locations of the temporary
monitor wells are shown in Figure 4-3. Analytical results for these groundwater
samples are included in Table 4-2. As can be seen in the tables, benzene is the
only contaminant of concern detected at or above the levels established in the
PRG' s. lsopropanol and acetone are not contaminants at this site. The
isopropanol and acetone concentrations are an artifact of the field
decontamination procedures.
4.1.3 Permanent Monitoring Wells
Six permanent monitoring wells were installed using hollow stem auger drilling
methods. Four shallow wells (MWS-01 to MWS-04) were completed at depths of
approximately 15 ·feet bls while two deeper wells (MWD-01 and MWD-02) were
completed at depths of approximately 27. 5 feet bls. The location of the
monitoring wells is presented in Figure 4-4. Monitoring well construction data
is listed in Table 4-3. The well logs and well schematics are given in Appendix
D.
Deep monitoring wells were not screened immediately above the Castle Hayne
formation, as outlined in the work plan. While drilling the initial test boring
upgradient of the site, a 5 foot thick layer of dense blue-gray clay was
encountered. This clay was confirmed to be present at the same approximate depth
throughout the site area. Consequently, the deep wells were set immediately
above this clay layer. Geotechnical data on this clay are presented in section
3.1.2. I
The boreholes for the wells were drilled with a CME 45 drill rig. The monitoring
wells were built inside 6-inch inside 1diameter hollow stern augers (10-inch
outside diameter) to ensure proper and ad~quate placement of sand pack material,
and to minimize well development activities. -
I
I The hollow stem augers were fitted with an inside pilot assembly with a center
bit to keep the unconsolidated, sandy soils from heaving into the inside of the
augers. After the augers were advanced to the prescribed depth of monitoring
well placement, the inside pilot assembly was removed from the augers. The well
pipe material (2-inch diameter, flush threaded, Type 304 stainless steel casing
and screen with a basal plug) was placed inside the augers and approximately 1-
foot of sand pack material (20/40 Flint:shot rounded quartz sand) was placed
below the well pipe to hold it at the proper depth. Additional sand pack
material was added inside the augers while the augers were withdrawn from the
borehole and the wellpipe was held stationary. Sand pack placement adjacent to
the screened interval was confirmed by li~e measurements inside the augers. The
sand pack material extended approximately 2 feet above the top of the screened
interval. A bentonite pellet seal was placed above the sand pack in the shallow
wells and the annulus above the seal was grouted with Volclay Pure Gold. The
annulus above the sand pack in the deeper wells was grouted with Volclay Pure
I
D
0
R
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
0
Section No. 4.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 13
Gold. A concrete plug capped the remaining annular space and filled a 3-foot by
3-foot pad around the wells. A locking 4-inch by 4-inch protective casing with
lock was placed over each well.
Permanent monitoring wells were sampled twice, once immediately following
installation of the wells, and again three weeks later. First round sampling
results may be found in Table 4-4, second round sampling results are in Table 4-
5.
First round sampling results show all permanent monitoring wells to be
contaminated with chromium slightly above levels established in the PRG's (MCL),
50 ug/1. Chromium concentrations ranged ·from a low of 58 ug/1 (MWS-002) to a
high of 82 ug/1 (MWS-001). Two VOA' s were also detected above the levels
established in the PRG's, benzene and ethyl benzene. Benzene (PRG of 1 ug/1) was
detected at 3.SJ ug/1 and 7.9J ug/1 in wells MWS-001 and MWD-001, the upgradient
wells. Benzene was also detected at 110 ug/1 in wells MWS-002 and MWD-002, the
source monitoring wells. Ethyl benzene was reported above the levels established
in the PRG's (29 ug/1) in wells MWS-002 and MWD-002, at 34 ug/1 and 43J ug/1.
Other contaminants of concern detected at levels below their PRG's were toluene,
xylene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and naphthalene. No carcinogenic PAH's or
pesticide/PCB's were detected (see Table 4-4).
Second round sampling results are seen in Table 4-5. Samples were analyzed for
VOA's only. Benzene concentrations are 1.1 ug/1 and 7.7 ug/1 in wells MWS-001
and MWD-001, and 31 ug/1 and 94 ug/1 in M)JS-002 and MWD-002. Ethyl benzene was
detected at 30 ug/1 in MWD-002. No other volatiles were detected at levels at
or above those specified in the PRG's.
4.2 Soil Sampling
Most soil sampling was performed during the removal action. When soil
excavation/removal was completed, a compr~hensive investigation of residual soil
contaminants was conducted by ESD. This soil investigation was intended to
satisfy the needs of two separate programs with jurisdiction over the site, the
superfund removal program and the superfund remedial program. Meeting the needs
of both programs with a si_ngle study eliminated the need to conduct two separate,
similar studies and resulted in a savings to US-EPA in both time and money for
this site. These samples were analyzed for TCL/TAL constituents. The CLP
laboratory selected for inorganic analyses inadvertently lost the sample tags on
the groundwater samples. Consequently, no inorganic contaminants groundwater
data is available for evaluation. The CLP laboratory selected to analyze samples
for organic contaminants cannot reconstruct chain•of•custody.
The burn pit, various training areas, the 1storage tank, the underground pipe and
surrounding contaminated soils were remov'ed until clean soil or groundwater was
encountered. Soil samples were then taken of all excavated areas prior to
backfilling with clean soil. Samples were also taken at the drainage culverts.
During the RI, control surface and subsurface (saturated zone) samples were
collected, along with a surface soil sample near the excavated pit. Two
subsurface soil samples from areas known to be heavily contaminated were re-
collected.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.2.1 Removal/RI Soil Sampling
Section No. 4.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 14
Sample locations are shown in Figure 4-5; analytical data are summarized in
Tables 4-6, and 4-7. Only one soil sample·, BP-21 (a duplicate of BP-18)
contained contaminants (carcinogenic PAH's) above the levels currently specified
in the PRG's. These contaminants were not detected in sample BP-18.
4.2.2 RI Soil Sampling
Five soil samples were collected during the RI at the locations shown in Figure
4-6. Analytical results for soil sample~ collected during the RI are in Table
4-8. No contaminants were detected at or above the levels specified in the
PRG's. In particular, samples NH-013-SLB and NH-018-SLB, samples collected to
reconfirm earlier results, show no contaminants at levels of concern.
4.3 Waste Sampling
Three samples were collected of various waste materials at the site during the
RI. These were samples of the septic system, the drill cuttings, and the
wastewater holding tank. Analytical results are given in Table 4-9. The sample
collected from the septic system, NH-001-CN, had 5.4 mg/kg arsenic (PRG of 1.7
mg/kg). The other two samples, NH-001-WA and NH-002-CN, are samples of the drill
cuttings and wastewater holding tank. NH-001-WA was analyzed for the TCLP. As
seen in Table 4-9, no regulatory limits were exceeded. Sample NH-002-CN
contained 190 ug/1 of chromium and 110 ug/1 of lead, exceeding the PRG's (MCL's)
for these contaminants.
4.4 Aquifer Test
An 8-hour pump test followed by a 2-hour recovery test was conducted at the New
Hanover Site on 05/08/91. Five, 2-inch diameter observation wells were installed
to measure the influence the pumping well (MWD-01) had on the water table while
being pumped and after the pump was shut off (Figure 4-7) . Four of the
observation wells (OW-1 through OW-4) were installed in a line at distances of
10, 25, 50, and 100 feet from the pumping well. The fifth observation well (OW-
5) was installed perpendicular to the line of observation wells and 40 feet from
the pumping well. One shallow monitoring well (MWS-01), 15 feet from the pumping
well, and one deeper monitoring well (MWD.-02), approximately 250 feet from the
pumping well were also used to measure changes in the water table level during
the pump and recovery tests. Water levels-were measured approximately 25-hours,
18-hours, and 1.5-hours before the start of pumping to make certain water level
conditions were consistently static. Changes in water levels during the tests
were measured with pressure transducers and recorded with an 8-channel data
logger.
A gasoline powered centrifugal pump was used to pump water from the upgradient
deep screened water table well at a steady pumping rate. The centrifugal pump
was equipped with intake and discharge globe valves. The intake valve was set
in the open position and the discharge valve was adjusted to the appropriate
pumping rate during an initial short term pump test the day before the start of
the aquifer testing. The drop pipe was equipped with a check or foot valve which
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section No. 4.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 15
allowed water to flow in one direction only. The water pumped from the well was
discharged approximately 700 feet away from the well into a storage tank. When
the pump test was stopped, closing the intake valve plus having the foot valve
on the drop pipe kept water from interfering with the recovery portion of the
test.
Pumping test data (Appendix E) yields fairly reliable determinations of the
hydraulic characteristics of an aquifer. Time-drawdown graphs and distance-down
graphs were used in conjunction with several mathematical formulas for the
analysis of the pumping test data. The average aquifer characteristics
determined for the site are summarized as follows:
Transmissivity (T):
Storage coefficient (S):
Hydraulic conductivity (K):
Ground water flow velocity (v):
4.5 Quality Assurance Sampling
146 .ft2 /day
6. 3 X 10"3
6. 6 ft/day
0.0275 ft/day or 10.05 ft/yr
A total of 15 quality assurance samples were collected for this investigation.
The results are summarized in Table 4-10 (water samples) and Table 4-11
(soil/solid materials samples). None of the contaminants of concern identified
in the PRG's were detected in the water samples. In the soils/solid materials
samples, chromium (2. 2 mg/kg) and lead ·(19 mg/kg) were detected in the grout
blank (NH-003-MB) and lead (34 mg/kg) was detected in the bentonite blank _(NH-
002-MB). Xylene was detected at low levels (6.3J ug/kg) in the grout blank.
These metals and xylene (and various other compounds) were present at such low
levels that their presence in these materials has little if any impact upon the
quality assurance of the study.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Section No. 5.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 16
A small groundwater contaminant plume with contaminant concentrations above those
specified in the PRG's exists at the New Hanover Burn.Pit site. This contaminant
plume is very local to the former source area. Groundwater contaminants found
at levels above those specified in the PRG's are chromium, benzene, and ethyl
benzene.
No significant surface or subsurface soil contamination was detected. The
detection of arsenic (PRG of 1.7 mg/kg in" soil) at a concentration of 5.4 mg/kg
in the abandoned septic tank should not be of concern because of the small volume
of material involved.
It is possible that groundwater conditions at the site have not yet stabilized
from the upset caused by the installation and development of the monitoring
wells. This is evidenced by the change in concentration of contaminants between
the first and second round sampling. At least one more round of sampling should
be performed to determine baseline conditions at the site.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.0 REFERENCES
Section No. 10.0
Revision No. 1
Date: 08/09/91
Page 17
(1) North Carolina Department of Human Resources, 1987. Site Inspection Report,
New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit.
(2) New Hanover County, Engineering and Facilities Department, November 4, 1988.
Letter summarizing site history.
(3) U.S. Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry, December 17, 1989. Preliminary Health Assessment for the New
Hanover County Burn Pit, Wilmington, North Carolina.
(4) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, Environmental Services
Division, December 1991. Confirmation Sampling of Removal Activities, New
Hanover Burn Pit, Wilmington, North Carolina.
(5) North Carolina Department of Water and Air Resources, November 17, 1970.
"Geology and Groundwater Resources' of New Hanover County, North Carolina",
by George L. Bain. Groundwater Bulletin.
(6) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, Environmental Services
Division, February l, 1991. Environmental Compliance Branch Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual, (ECBSOPQAM).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A
FIGURES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
liiiill liiiil --- - ------- - - - - - -
~EPA
FIGURE 2-1
' SITE LOCATION MAP
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
JULY, 1991
-
135
--

-

-
FIGURE 2-2
SITE MAP
-
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
JULY, 1991
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 67.5 135
, , , ,,, , , , ,
,' , , , , , , ,
,,:,,Aura
_,J ~ -

-
---: :
/
1
,' BURN
,' / AREA , , , , , , ( IN FEET )
Inch • 1~ ft.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,<,'' TANK , , N -,'-,--BUR , (
CAR
AREA·
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
I ,
// , , , , , , I , I
5JEPA
--
, ,
' ' ' , , ' ' ' ' , ' ' , ' , ' ' ' ' , , ,
, ' ' , , , , ' I , I
-

-
--

-
-
SUPPLY
TANK
--

-
-
- - -- ---
FIGURE 3-1
LOCATION OF TEST BORES
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL, 1991
APPROXIMATE SCALE
87.5
( IN FEET )
inch • 135 ft.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
I , ,:/ , , , , , , I , I
: 135 :
~EPA
-----
,-----~
_--_--_--::A~c~;;T
BURN AREA
- - -
KU
TB • TEST BORES
MWO • MONITORING WELL (DEEP)
SUPPLY
TANK
- --
-------------------
!D
l£V[l
NORTH ... ,
50'
50'
100'
150'
200·
250'
JOO'
350'
~ il1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;
~ 0 il! ~ ~
~ ~ i=
~ i! l'i z u
UNOIFFERDITIA T[D LA TE TERTIARY
SILT AND CLAY AQUICLUDE
SILT AND CLAY AQUICLUDE
SOURCE: BAIN, 1970
~EPA
g
~ ~ I ~ i ~ ~ PIEZOMETRIC
~ SURF'ACE i <
FIGURE 3-2
HYDROGEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT AREA
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 1991
i
~ "' le' ~
I
-
CLAY AQUICL
Nosro
APPROXIMATE SCALE
2 0
~ ...I ----(IN MUS)
'IClmCAl SCAL[ QIIEA n. T DMXEtAltD
SOOTH
EAST
2
I
---

-
---
FIGURE 3-3
WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 9, 1991
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 --( IN FEET )
Inch • 135 ft.
, , , , , , ' , ' , , ' , , , , , , ' I ' ' I ' , ' ' , ' ' ' ' ' '
87.5
: '"' :
~EPA
--
' ' ' ' ' ' , ,
' ' ' , ' ' ' , , ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' I
----

-
WL-1
(28.47')
-
SUPPLY
TANK
--

-
-
----

-
--
FIGUE 3-4
WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL 17, 1991 ,
I,' , I , , , , , , , , , , , ,
APPROXIMATE SCALE ,' ,
/ :'AUTO
87.5 135 / ,' BURN
( IN FEET )
Inch • 1~ ft.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
1' /
,' / ,' , , , , , I , I
: : / ,' AREA , ,
, I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,'
I-,-,' I
TANK CAR
BURN AREA
~EPA
-

-
-
--------------i~c~;FT BURN AREA
-
' '
f
I
' '' ' '
-
NCTI() 'h \\ X ... •.. I I . . ' ' \, ,, \ \ ·-· '. \ \ r··----. -.. __ .\ .\ \
I •• \ \ ··-.. --~~~-: ~~::;_,j ..... /'' .. -',
\ '
.,) \'
----
KEl
MWS • MONITORfNG m.L. (SHAUOW)
MWO • MCNITORING ffl...l (DEEP)
• NOT!: WATER l£VEL ELEVATIONS
0£NOTED IN PARENTHESES
MWD-001 (27.34')
MWS-001 (27.34')
SUPPLY
TANK
--
-
,,.
------
FIGURE 3-5
WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
MAY 7, 1991
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0 67.5 135
/, , -
,' I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,,:,,Au10
h ---: :
,/ / BURN
,' ,' AREA
' ' , ' ' , ( IN FEET )
1 inch -135 ft.
,'
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ,:/
' ' ' ' //'
' ' ' , ' , , ' ' ' ' ' ' , , ' ' ' , ' ' , , ' ' ' ' ,
/,/ TANK CAR
/,'-BURN-AREA
' I
~EPA
---
_ _-_-_-_-_-_-i~c~ ;FT
BURN AREA
-
---
I
-
' '
-----
KEY
MWS • MONITORING 'll£U. (SHALLOW)
MWO -MOOITORING 'lfELL {DEEP)
OW~ OBSERVATION WELL
• NOTE: WATER LE\R. ELEVATIONS
OENOlEO IN PARENlHESES
MW0-001 (27.30')
OW-1 (27.30')
OW-5 (27.37')
MWS-001 (27.30')
OW-2 (27.31')
OW-3 (27.32')
OW-4 (27.44')
SUPPLY
TANK
--
- -------
FIGURE 4-1
LOCATION OF WATER LEVEL PIEZOMETERS
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL, 1991
,',, -
//•WL-3 ,' , , , , , , , , ,
APPROXIMATE SCALE ,</Aura
0 67.5 135 // BURN _,J
( IN FEET )
inch • 135 ft.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
I ,
// , , , , , , I , I
: I ,' ,' AREA , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,</' TANK C_AR_~-_
/> -BURNAREA
' 1 eWL-4 ---------...
~EPA
--

-
--

-
WL-1
--
SUPPLY
TANK
\_
-

-
-
-------------------
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT SITE
/-:::: ... -------
FIGURE 4-2
CONFIRMATION SAMPLING
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELLS
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER, 1990 l~:ro
TANK CAR
BURN A~A
BURN
AREA
.. ---·--------
-------------· ---·------
-----· •,
\
AIRCRAFT \
BURN AREA O.o \
'< ' • < // . , ,,---
: i \ \\ \,
\\ \
11ok>-o ~ \ \ \ . . .
\ ' . ... . \.> ... \, \ .. ___ ! ._, -... _____ _
~/ ...
..IL!!e... ~ ' ~ 'l)A90 M[A.! NIICl,11:
CXTDIT rs DCA,V,1,nc,,i 1#:.AI
/ (
&EPA
125
'
\
LEGEND
................ BERM/ROAD
•
EXCAVATION
SAMPLE LOCATION
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0
( IN FEET )
1 Inch = 125 ft.
SUPPLY
TANK
62.5 125
---

-

-
-
FIGURE 4-3
LOCATION OF TEMPORARY WELLS
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL, 1991 ,,-, , ,,, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
APPROXIMATE SCALE ,',
,' ,/AUTO
/ ' BURN 0
w ....I -( IN FEET )
1 Inch • 13' ft.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
I , :/ ' ' : , ' ,
I ' I
, ,
,' ,' AREA , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
,</ TANK CAR
/~/-BURN-AREA , I
&EPA
-----

-
---

-
-

-
_:-_:-.. ---~~CR;;T
BURN AREA
I
-
,,.
I
-

-
--

-
-
FIGURE 4-4
LOCATION OF PERMANENT WELLS
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL, 1991 ,,-, ,' , I , , , , , ' , ' ' ' ' '
APPROXIMATE SCALE ,' ' ,',,,AUTO
0
-__,J --( IN F"EET )
Inch • 1~ ft.
97.5
:
,,.
:
,' , suor-.1
I I t' "
,' ,' AREA , ' ' , , ,
' ' ' ' ' ' , ' ' ' ' , , ' ' ' ' ' , ' ' ' ' ' ' ' , ,
--
/,/ TANK CAR
// _BURN-AREA-MWS-004
' ' ' ' , ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' I ' ' , ' ' ' ' , ' ' I '
• ---
MWS-003
,
' , ' , , , ' , , , ' , , ' , , , , , , , ' , , , , , , ' ' , I , I
~EPA
---

-
I
--

-
-=
MWS • MONITORING 'IIEl.l. (SHAWJ'#)
MWD • M~ITORING V.O.L (DEEP)
SUPPLY
TANK
--
-------------------
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT SITE
.. --·--··--
----··
.. -------·········---------... ____ '.
FIGURE 4-5
CONFIRMATION SAMPLING
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER, 1990
-·· .. ---·· /·:::: ... ---
/f.:, ~-,,
TANK CAR
BURN A~A ~ ..
' ------
BURN •
AREA
AIRCRAFT
BURN AREA
\ \
NOTC: OA9D «AS NIICAT[
DTDIT <7 CXC,.W.'IICIII "'4M
'
,.-· -·-
: / '. 6..o i I \ •''o , . , \\ \\
_s.,. \ \ \ 0 \\ \
,.'Oq \:>... \,
\ ·-' ... -... _,. ............
-_______ ··------0 !16 CM. tlUillS
----.. :.:::_~<:··c;;:::;::::::; ' m "'-,
-::=.a MJ..:,:t--• .. ·---. \ \ \
'
\
-.. __ ·---. \ \
-----<->----' \ ,,--;:~~~-;J
/:> .: __ \::::::---_________ ,,.,_;:::::::::::>/ ;;:::::::::::::::>
aiEPA
............ ~
,/ ,:' ,, ________ _
// .
,/ ,:'
,/.,l
./(
125
LEGEND
•
BERM/ROAD
EXCAVATION
SAMPLE LOCATION
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0
( IN-FEET )
1 inch = 125 ft.
SUPPLY
TANK
625 125
----

-
FIGURE 4-6
SOIL SAMPLES
-
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
APRIL, 1991
/' ,,,--
, I , , , , ,' ,
APPROXIMATE SCALE
, , , , , ,
,,:/Aura
/ ,' BURN 67.5 :
( IN FEET )
1 Inch • 135 fl.
1JO : ,' ,' AREA , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
:/' TANK CAR
--/~,--BURN AREA , (
, , , , , , ' , , ' , , , , , , , , ' , I , ,:/ , , , , , ,
I , I
-------
5JEPA
----------
LEGEND
■
SUPPLY
TANK
BERM/ROAD
EXCAVATION
SURFACE
SOIL SAMPLE
SUBSURFACE
SOIL SAMPLE
--
-
135
-----
FIGURE 4-7
LOCATION OF AQUIFER TEST WELLS
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
MAY, 1991
APPROXIMATE SCALE
67.5 135
, -, , ,
, I , , , , , , , , , , , , ,' ,
,' /'AUTO
-
--0
w ....I -: :
/ ,' BURN
,' ,' AREA , , , , , , ( IN FEET )
1 Inch • 1~ ft.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
I , , I : : , , , , , ,
I , {
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , />/ TANK CAR
/-;-suRN--AREA , I --MWS.,-004 •
MWS-003
&EPA
---
--------
-----AIRCRAFT
BURN AREA
-

-
----
KEl
MWS • MONITORING 'l'IEll (SHAU.OW)
MWO • MCHITORING 'IIEll. {DEEP)
OW• OBSERVATI~ WELL
SUPPLY
TANK
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX B
TABLES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1
PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS
GROUNDWATER
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT SITE
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
INORGANIC ELEMENT
LEAD
CHROMIUM
ARSENIC
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
(CARCINOGENIC PAH'S)
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
CHRYSENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
INDENO(l,2,3-C,D)PYRENE
(NON-CARCINOGENIC PAH'S)
ACENAPHTHENE
ANTHRACENE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
NAPHTHALENE
PYRENE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
BENZENE
2-BUTANONE
ETHYL BENZENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
CONCENTRATION GOAL
MG/L
0.015
0.05
0.05
MG/L
0.00021
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
2.2
11. 3
1. 5
1. 5
0.2
1.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
MG/L
0.001
0.17
0.029
0.005
1.0
0.4
****"Irk**************************************************************
1NOTE: THE SUM TOTAL CONCENTRATION OF CARCINOGENIC PAH'S IS NOT TO EXCEED
0.0002 MG/L.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-2
PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION.GOALS
SOIL
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT SITE
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CONCENTRATION
INORGANIC ELEMENT MG/KG
LEAD 500.0
CHROMIUM 15.0
ARSENIC 1. 7
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS MG/KG
(CARCINOGENIC PAH'S)
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 0.311
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 0. 31
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE 0.31
CHRYSENE 0.31
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE 0. 31
INDENO(l,2,3-C,D)PYRENE 0. 31
(NON-CARCINOGENIC PAH'S)
ACENAPHTHENE 120,000
ANTHRACENE 610,000
FLUORANTHENE 82,000
FLUORENE 82,000
NAPHTHALENE 8,200
PYRENE 61,000
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 8,200
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE 8,200
PHENANTHRENE 8,200
ANTHRACENE 8,200
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS MG/KG
BENZENE 0.41
2-BUTANONE 2,500
ETHYL BENZENE 200,000
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 1.5
TOLUENE 7,900
TOTAL XYLENES 3,000
GOAL
****-lrlr************************************************************** I 1NOTE: THE SUM TOTAL CONCENTRATION OF C¥CINOGENIC PAH'S IS NOT TO EXCEED
0.31 MG/KG.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Approximate Depth
Encountered (feet)
0 to 0.5
0.5 to 4
4 to 7
7 to 13
13 to 28
28 to 33
33 to 60
60 to?
***NOTE***
TABLE 3-1
GENERALIZED GEOLOGY (TB-1)
NEW HANOVER SITE
MAY, 1991
Approximate
Thickness (feet) Lithologic Description
0.5
3.5
3
6
15
5
27
?
Root zone, black sandy loam
Black and gray, fine grained quartz
sand and silt
Yellow, tan to white, fine grained
quartz sand; wet at 5 feet bls
White, fine grained quartz sand
White to gray fine grained quartz
silty sand
Blue-gray, clay
Light gray, medium to coarse grained
quartz sand
Hard, sandy, phosphatic,
fossiliferous limestone with calcite
filled fractures
Lithologic descriptions are based on visual classification of subsurface soils
and rock encountered during test borings by a professional geologist.
I
I
I
I
I
I
INORGANIC ELEMENTS
I MERCURY
I EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
I
I
I
I
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
NAPHTHALENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
TRIMETHYLCYCLOPENTENONE
TRIMETHYLHEXANOIC ACID
METHYLNAPHTHALENEACETIC ACID
NAPHTHOPYRANDIONE
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
10 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
17 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
I PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
I
I
I
BENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PENTANE
METHOXYMETHYLPROPANE
OXYBISPROPANE
TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENE
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE(2 ISOMERS)
PROPYLBENZENE
3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
TABLE 4-1
ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
NEW HANOVER SITE
DECEMBER 1990
BP-22
TEMP
WELL#l
12/12/90
1030
UG/L
UG/L
lJ
1J
UG/L
I *irl:*****-lrlc*-lrlrlrlr-lrl:***********************************************
***FOOTNOTES-ktt I
NA NOT ANALYZED J -ESTIMATED VALUE I -MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETEC~ED
BP-23
TEMP
WELL#2
12/12/90
1150
UG/L
UG/L
19
22
200J
UG/L
7JN
BP-24
TEMP
WELL#3
12/12/90
1405
UG/L
UG/L
2J
2J
20JN
50JN
40J
UG/L
SJ
1J
2J
J?P-25
TEMP
WELL#4
12/12/90
1450
UG/L
1. 60J
UG/L
15
70JN
300JN
N
2000J
UG/L
210
120
2J
lOJN
lOOJN
20JN
60JN
40JN
60JN
50J
-------------------
TABLE 4-2
QUICK-TURN-AROUND VOA'S
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
IN-HOUSE REMEDIAL INVESTICATION
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
NH-004 NH-005 NH-006
TMW-1 TMW-2 TMW-3
04/09/91 04/09/91 04/09/91
1430 1435 1455
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/L UG/L UG/L
BENZENE l.2J
CHLOROMETHANE 4. SJ
ACETONE 3100J 680J 2100J
CARBON DISULFIDE 4.3J
ISOPROPANOL 2000JN 300JN 700JN
****************************************************************
***FOOTNOTES***
J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
NH-007 NH-008 NH-009 NH-010
TMW-4 TMW-5 TMW-6 TMW-7
04/09/91 04/09/91 04/09/91 04/09/91
1500 1435 1505 1600
UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
510J 890J
200JN 400JN
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 4-3
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
NEW HANOVER SITE
MAY, 1991
Well Total Depth Screened Sand Pack Stick Up ToC Elev.
I.D. bls (ft) Interval
MWS-001 14.88 14.7-4.9
MWS-002 14.88 14.7-4.9
MWS-003 15.01 14.8-5.1
MWS-004 14.96 14.8-5.0
MWD-001 27.81 27.6-17.9
MWD-002 27.42 27.2-17.5
***NOTE***
I.D. -Identification
MWS -Monitoring Well (Shallow)
MWD -Monitoring Well (Deep)
bls -Below Land Surface
Interval (ft)
15.5-3.4 2.83
15.5-3.0 2.83
17.0-3.0 2.70
16.0-3.0 2.75
28.0-15.5 2.40
27.5-14.0 2.79
Screened and Sand Pack Interval refer to depth bls.
Stick Up refers to height above land surface.
ToC -Top of casing
(ft NGVD29)
33.99
33.34
33.31
32.33
33.50
33.27
NGVD29 refers to National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929.
-------------------
TABLE 4-4
FIRST ROUND SAMPLING
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
IN-HOUSE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
NH-OOlGW NH-002GW NH-003GW NH-004GW NH-005GW NH-006GW
MWS-001 MWD-001 MWD-002 MWS-002 MWS-003 MWS-004
04/17/91 04/17/91 04/17/91 04/17/91. 04/17 /91 04/17/91
0925 1040· 1120 1210 1315 1510
INORGANIC ELEMENTS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
CHROMIUM 82 72 60 58 65 71
BARIUM 99 160 370 290 92 50
COPPER 21 17 17 12 14
NICKEL 36 23 69 69 33 110
STRONTIUM 250 480 640 160 56 59
TITANIUM 180 310 300 220 190 85
VANADIUM ---56--73 63-----67--60 -20· -
--------YTTRIUM 17 13 17
ZINC 52 53 62 40 40 40
ALUMINUM 52000 56000 36000 46000 58000 16000
MANGANESE 99 360 490 130 61 59
MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L
CALCIUM 25 22 38 28 6.3 8.6
MAGNESIUM 3.2 7.7 12 7.0 2.8 2.6
IRON 12 28 40 22 11 6.1
SODIUM 37 37 260 250 9.7 6.1
POTASSIUM 3.2 4.8 9.0 11 3.5
PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
2-MEYTHYNAPHTHALENE "6.0J 16J
NAPHTHALENE llJ 19J
TABLE 4-4 (CONTINUED)
NH-001GW NH-002GW NH-003GW NH-004GW NH-005GW NH-006GW
MWS-001 MWD-001 MWD-002 MWS-002 MWS-003 MWS-004
04/17 /91 04/17/91 04/17/91 04/17/91 04/17 /91' 04/17/91
0925 1040 1120 1210 1315 1510
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
2-METHYLPHENOL 2. 7J 6.lJ 5.lJ
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2,3J 42J 54
METHYLPYRROLIDINONE 20JN
ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE (3 ISOMERS) lOJN
METHYLBENZENEMETHANOL 3JN
TETRAHYDROMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 3JN
ETHYWIMETHYLBENZENE (6 ISOMERS) 20JN
DIHYDROMETHYLINDENE 3JN
TETRAHYDRONAPHTHALENE 4JN 6JN
DIHYDRODIMETHYLINDENE 3JN
DIHYDRONAPHTHALENONE 5JN
TRIMETHYLBENZOIC ACID(3 ISOMERS) 20JN 40JN
DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 6JN
DIMETHYLPHENOL(NOT 2,4-) 4JN 60JN
BICYCLOHEPTYL 40JN
METHYLBENZENEACETIC ACID lOJN 20JN 50JN
NAPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE 40JN
2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 200J
ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS 20JN
TRIMETHYLHEXANOIC ACID 4JN 700JN lOOOJN
TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENEDIOXIDE 500JN 600JN
1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 4JN 20JN lOOJN
NAPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE 200JN
5 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 900J
((BUTOXYETHOXY)ETHOXY)ETHANOL 5JN
-------------------
TABLE 4-4 (CONTINUED)
NH-OOlGW NH-002GW NH-003GW
MWS-001 MWD-001 MWD-002
04/17/91 04/17/91 04/17/91
0925 1040 1120
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/L UG/L UG/L
BENZENE 3.5J 7.9J 110
TOLUENE 2.0J 14J
ETHYL BENZENE 3. 3J 8.5J 34
TOTAL XYLENES 10.SJ 25.3J 82J
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM 2. lJ
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 4.4J
ETHYL ETHER 90JN 300JN
TRIMETHYLBENZENE (3 ISOMERS) SOJN
ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE lOJN
--TRIMETHYLBENZENE-(2 -ISOMERS) SOJN
METHOXYMETHYLPROPANE
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
****************************************************************
***FOOTNOTES***
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
NH-004GW NH-005GW NH-006GW
MWS-002 MWS-003· MWS-004
04/17/91 04/17/91 04/17/91
1210 1315 1510
UG/L UG/L UG/L
110
5.SJ 0.89J
43J
19.4J
l.SJ
2. 9J l.2J
200JN
60JN
-------------------
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
BENZENE
TOLUENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
!., 2::_ QJ.fHLOROETIIANE
ETHYL ETHER
ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS)
TRIMETHYLBENZENE (3 ISOMERS)
METHYLPROPANOL
DIMETHYL PENTANONE
TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENE
TRIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS)
METHOXYPROPANOL
METHOXYMETHYLPROPANE
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
TABLE 4-5
SECOND ROUND SAMPLING
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
IN-HOUSE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
NH-OlBMW
MWS-001
05/07/91
0910
UG/L
1.1
1. 2J
4. lJ
3.4J
30JN
SJN
NH-02BMW
MWD-001
05/07/91
0925
UG/L
7.7
1. SJ
7 .4
21. 9J
1. 7J
200JN
20JN
60JN
lOJN
NH-03BMW
MWS-004
05/07/91
1030
UG/L
l.6J
****************************************************************
***FOOTNOTES***
J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
NH-04BMW
MWS-003
05/07/91
1050
UG/L
0. 77J
O.SlJ
NH-OSBMW
MWS-002
05/07/91
1140
UG/L
31
2.SJ
9.2J
9. lJ
64J
1. SJ
20JN
40JN
20JN
30JN
lOOJN
NH-06BMW
MWD-002
05/07/91
1145
UG/L
94
13J
30
82J
2.7J
SOJN
lOOJN
SOJN
-- --- - - -- - - -- - - - -- -
TABLE 4-6 ANALYTICAL DATA SUl1iARY SEDIMENT AND PIT SAMPLES
NEW HANOVER SITE DECEMBER 1990
BP-01 BP-02 BP-13 BP-1'1. BP-15 BP-16 BP-17 BP-18 BP-21 BP-19 BP-20
SEDIMENT SEDIM!flT BURN PIT BURN PIT BURN PIT BURN PIT SHALL SHALL BP DUP OF BORROW BURN PIT
WEST EAST SW SE NE NW BURN PIT TRENCH BP-18 PIT HORN
12/11/90 lZ/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/12/90 12/12/90 12/12/90 12/12/90
0935 1000 1600 1610 1620 1630 1650 0840 0840 0855 0915
INORGANIC ELEMENTS "'3/KG P<,/J(G t-li/KO P<,/KG P<,/J(G P<,/J(G P<,/KG P<,/1(0 P<,/KG P<,/1(0 P<,/KG
Clll!IJKml 1.9 4,3 3.2 2,8 2.9 3 2.2 3 2.2 3.2 2.9
LIWl · 7. 7J llJ 7.4J 8.5J 13J 23J 2.6J 18J 61J 7,6J 7.3J
BARIUM 8.3 7 .1 • ,9 21 13 6.6 5.4 5.6
COPPER 48J 13J 6.6J 6.6J llJ 14J 12J
NICKEL 5
VANADIUM 1. 8 5.8 3.2 2.9 3.4 3.9 2 3 2.1 3.2 3.3
YTTRIUM NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
ZINC 26 26 18 18 36 40 27 32 14
ALUMINUM 1500 4900 2600 2500 2200 2800 1500 2200 1700 2800 2400
MANGANESE 8.3 '·' 3.7 3.7 2.6
CALCIUM 240 260 410 460 1100 1300 92 890 1200 300 330
MAGNESIUM 140 100 150 98 130 130
IRON 150J 730J 590J 500J 730J 780J liOOJ 560J 540J 520J 620J
POTASSIUM 130 120
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/XG UG/XG
Plll!IIAIITIIRE 98J 350J 760J ZOOOJ 240J 320J
AlffllRACEl<E 53J
PYREIIE 250J 50J
IIAl'IITIIALEII 1600J
2--HETBtlJW'IITI 3700 370J 960J 11000 3200
BEIIW(A)AIITBRACEIIE 160J
CBRTSERE 150J
BEJIW(B Alm/mt I)FLlDWffllEIIE ----250J
BENWCA)PYRENE 83J
OCTAHYDROHEXAMETHYLINDENE 4000JN ZOOJN
ETHYLDIHETHYLBENZENE ZOOOJN
1 METHYLNAPHTHALENE ZOOOJN 9000JN
DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE ZOOOOJN 2000JN 7000JN
TRIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE 6000JN
DIHYORCNETHANONAPHTHALENE ZOOOJN lOOOOJN
3 UNIDENTIFIED CCl1POUNDS 2000J
9 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 200000J
10 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS BOOOJ
11 UNIDENTIFIED CctfPOUNDS lOOOOJ 60000J
12 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 200000J
15 UNIDENTIFIED CO-tPOUNDS ZOOOOOJ
16 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 60000J
16 UNIDENTIFIED CO-tPOUNDS 90000J
19 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS lOOOOOJ
PETROLEUM PRODUCT N N N N N N N N N
PURGE.ABLE ORGANICS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/J(G UG/J(G UG/KG
IIERZl!IIE 140J
£Tim. BEIIZl!IIE 2600 'i20J
rotAL XYLERES 3900 llOOJ
DECANE 5000JN 30000JN
DIMETHYLHEPTANE 4000JN
NONANE BOOOJN
PROPYLHEXANE 5000JN
ETHYLMETHYLHEPTANE {2 ISOMERS) 6000JN
TRIHETHYLHEPTANE 3000JN
ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE 4000JN
TRIMETHYLBENZENE lOOOOJN
TRIMETHYLNONANE 3000JN
1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND 2000J 7000J
#,••FOOTNOTES•••
NA NOT ANALYZED J -ESTIMATED VALUE -MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
- - -- - - - - - - - -- --- - - -
TABLE 4-7
ANALYTICAL DATA Sm-t1ARY
PIPELINE AND TRAINING AREAS SAMPLES
NEW HANOVER SITE DECEMBER 1990
BP-03 BP-04 BP-05 BP-06 BP-07 BP-08 BP-09 BP-10 BP-11 BP-12
SUPPLY BURIED BURIED BURIED BURIED BURIED VALVE AIRCRAFT CAR RR TARI(
TARI( PIPE PIPE PIPE PIPE PIPE BOX AREA AREA AREA
12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90 12/11/90
1026 1045 1105 1130 1155 1340 1'110 1430 1500 1520
INORGANIC ELf.l-!ENTS rt:3/KG f-G/KG 11}/l(G M:;/KG rt:3/KG H3/KG !<}/KG 11}/l(G !13/KG 1'13/KG
CIIRDU!»I 4 3.3 2.6 3.1 2.8 2.3 2.8 •. 3 5.2 2.1
LEAD 5."3 4.5J 3.4J 4.8J 4.lJ 8.ZJ 3.8J 19J 38J 3.2J
BARIUM 5.5 4.8 9.3 29
COPPER 24J 2J 35J 12J 16J
NICKEL 7.1
VANADIUM 5 2.7 2.8 2.9 3 2.7 2.1 3.2 3.4 1. 7
ZINC 25 21 18 23 42 20 18 68 110 23
ALUMINUM 4100 2800 2200 2400 400 2100 3000 1600 1400 1600
MANGANESE 3. 9 20 14
CALCIUM 310 77 140 500 66 83 260 280
MAGNESIUM 140 96
IRON 1300J 440J 500J 550J 600J 360J 680J 7600J 5000J 200J
POTASSIUM 130
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC C01POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2-tllmlYLIW'IITI 420UR 63J llO0UR 380UR
IIAPl!11IALfllE 'i20UR 1600 ll00UR 380UR
FLIOWITIIEIIE 80J 420UR llOOUR 380UR
PYREIIE li20UR •8J ll00UR JBOUR
--DIETHYL PHTHALATE 68J li20UR ll00UR JBOUR
PHENYLETHANONE BOJN lOOJN
TETRAHYDRCMETHANOINDEHE 3000JN
ETBYLDIHETHYLBENZENE(Z ISCl1ERS) lOOOJN
METHYLPROPENYLBENZENE JOOJN
TETRAMETHYLBENZENE(2 ISCliERS} 2000JN
1 UNIDENTIFIED Cct1POUND 600J lOOOJ
2 UNIDENTIFIED C01POUNDS 5000J
5 UNIDENTIFIED CCMPOUNDS 5000J
7 UNIDENTIFIED Cct1POUNDS 6000J
20 UNIDENTIFIED Cct1POUNDS JOOOOJ 40000J
PETROLEUM PRODUCT N N
PURGEABLE ORGANIC CCliPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
ETHYL BERlZRE 72
roTAL XYLENES 460
****************************************************************
***FOOTNOTES*•*
NA -NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
u MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSABLE, ca-1POUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION, THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 4-8
SOIL SAMPLES
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT IN-BOUSE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
NB-00lSC NB-002SL
CONTROL CONTROL
SURFACE SUBSURF
04/10/91 04/10/91
1420 1440
INORGANIC ELEMENTS Kl/KG Kl/KG
Al!SEIIIC
CIIIIIMilll l. 4 l. 7
LEAD 6.0
BARIUM 6. 7 2. 7
COPPER
TIR
STRONTIUM 3.4
TITANIUM 130 65
VANADIUM 2.1 l. 7
ZINC 2.4
MERCURY 0.065
ALUMIRUM 580 1600
MANGANESE 4.5 2.2
CALCIUM 630
MAGNESIUM 64 37
IRON 400 860
PESTICIDE/PCB ca-fi'QUNDS
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC CCMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG
2-tlETlltlJIAPII 1 UNIDENTIFIED CCMPOUND 7000J
ETHYLOIHETHYLBENZENE ( 4 ISO<ERS)
1-HETHYLMAPBTHALENE
DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE TRIMETBYLNAPBTHALENE (4 ISCMERS)
HETHYLPHENANTBRENE ( 2 ISO<ERS)
DIMETHYLPHENANTHRENE PETROLEUM PRODUCT --
PURGEABLE ORGANIC C01POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG
ETIIYL BEBZERE
to!ALJ<Il.ERES lOJ
TRIMETHYI.BENZENE (2 ISCMERS)
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
***FOOTNOTES***
NA -HOT ANALYZED
J -ESTIMATED VALUE H -PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
NB-003SL NB-013S1 NH-018SL
NEAR PIT REPEATOF REPEATOF
SURFACE BP-13 BP-18
04/10/91 04/17/91 04/17/91
1530 1625 1640
Kl/KG Kl/KG K;/KG
1.2
3.6 2.8 1.9
130 4.3 2.8
37 5.0 2.2
10
4.5
8.4 2.5
66 150 150
4.7 4.0 1.8
66 1.7 l. 3
0.10 2200 2500 500
22 6.4 5.1
1700 320 84
120 130 24
3300 630 230
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
230J
3000JN
500JN
lOOOJN
4000JN
800JN
800JN
N N
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
31J
4000JN
I
I TABLE 4-9
WASTE SAMPLES
I NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
IN-HOUSE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
I NH-OOlCN NH-002CN NH-001WA
SEPTIC WASTEH20 DRILL
TANK TANK CUTTINGS
I
04/10/91 04/17/91 04/17/91
1610 1400 1535
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG UG/L MG/KG
I ARSENIC 5.4
CHROMIUM 3.1 190 3.9
LEAD 53 110 4.1
I SILVER 6.6
BARIUM 30 280 8.0
COPPER 12 77 2.6
I NICKEL 47
TIN 5.2
STRONTIUM 12 1200 7.2
TITANIUM 40 480 86
I VANADIUM 8.5 180 5.1
YTTRIUM 2.4 51 1.4
ZINC 68 1200 9.2
MERCURY 1.5
I ALUMINUM 5700 140000 2200
MANGANESE 33 560 20
I MG/KG MG/L MG/KG
CALCIUM 2600 38 530
MAGNESIUM 130 16 180
I IRON 9600 57 2000
SODIUM 60 140
POTASSIUM 10
I EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS MG/KG UG/L MG/L (TCLP*)
2-METHYLPHENOL 20J NA
PHENOL 36J NA
I ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE (3 ISOMERS) 50JN NA
DIHYDROMETHYLINDENE (2 ISOMERS) 60JN NA
OCTANOIC ACID 30JN NA
I 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 20JN NA
TRI(CHLOROETHANOL)PHOSPHATE lOOJN NA
BUTYLBENZENESULFONAMIDE 30JN NA
TRI(DICHLOROPROPANOL)PHOSPHATE 20JN NA
I 1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND 70000J
COMPOUNDS MG/KG (TCLP*) PURGEABLE ORGANIC UG/L MG/L
ACETONE 14000J NA I 0-XYLENE 73J NA
ISOPROPANOL 2000JN NA
*************************************************.***************
I ***FOOTNOTES***
NA -NOT ANALYZED J -ESTIMATED VALUE
N -PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
I • -CANNOT FAIL TCLP TEST BASED ON SCAN ANALYSES
- -- -- - - - - -- - ---- -- -
TABLE li-10 QUALITY ASSURANCE -WATER
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
IN-BOUSE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
TB NBOOlTB NHOOZFB NB002tB NH0TBFB NHOOlWTB NHOOZDTB NH003OFS RHOOlFB HBOOlEB RB002EB
REH)VAL lSIWEEX 2NDWEEX ASCORBIC 2NDRND BUFFALO DRILLRIG OFSWATER OFSWATER ERB ERB
IRPBLARJ< IRPBLARJ< IRPBLARJ< TRPBLAHK IRPBLARJ< BLANK Bl.ARI< SYSTEM SYSTil-t 8"ID AUG CASING
12/13/91 04/12/91 04/16/91 04/17/91 05/07/91 04/09/91 04/09/91 0li/09/91 O'i/16/91 04/11/91 04/16/91
1530 1645 1010 1230 0940 1130 1205 1215 os•s 1115 0935
INORGANIC ELEMENTS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
BARIUM NA NA NA NA NA 24 23
COPPER NA NA NA NA NA 49 9. 7
STRONTIUM NA NA NA NA NA 50 51 2.1
TITANIUM NA NA NA NA NA 11 9.9 7 .0 11 10
ZINC NA NA NA NA NA 12 41
ALUMINUM NA NA NA NA NA 220 220
MANGANESE NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 1'
"3/L "3/L "3/L "3/L "3/L "3/L "3/L "3/L "3/L "3/L "3/L
CALCIUM NA NA NA NA NA 16 17 0.28
MAGNESIUM NA ·NA NA NA NA I. 8 1.8
IRON NA NA NA NA NA 0.17 0.45 0.021
SODIUM NA NA NA NA NA 7.0 6.5
POTASSIUM NA NA NA NA NA 1.8 1.8
CYANIDE NA NA NA NA NA
PESTICIDE/PCB CC11POUNDS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
DIELDRIN NA NA ___ NA NA NA 0. 038J-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC CCl1POUNDS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
BENZOTHIAZOLE NA NA NA NA NA '"" TRI(BUTOKYETHANOL)PHOSPHATE NA NA NA NA NA 20JN 40JN
OOOECANOIC ACID NA NA NA NA NA 2JN
PURGEABLE ORGANIC CCMPOUNDS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
CHLORCl1ETHANE 0.66J
CHLOROFORM 75J ,9J
BRCHJOICHLORCliETHANE 9.1 6.0
DIBRCHX:HLORCMETHANE 0.92J .55J
ISOPROPANOL lOOJN
TRIMETHOXYBOROXIN 30JN
****************************************************************
***FOOTNOTES*** NA -NOT ANALYZED
J -ESTIMATED VALUE
N -PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 4•11
QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA SOLIDS
NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
IN-HOUSE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
TBS NH·00lMB NH-002MB
SOIL SAND BENT.
TRPBLANK BLANK BLANK
12/13/90 04/11/91 04/15/91
1535 1200 1005
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG
BARIUM NA 86
BERYLLIUM NA 1.1
CHROMIUM NA
COPPER NA 4.7
MOLYBDENUM NA 2.9 NICKEL NA 2.1
LEAD NA 34
STRONTIUM NA 150
TITANIUM NA 15
VANADIUM NA 1. 0
YTTRIUM NA 19
ZINC NA 78
ALUMINUM NA 12 9100
MANGANESE NA 64
CALCIUM NA 4000
MAGNESIUM NA 2200
IRON NA 72 4400 SODIUM NA 15000 ' POTASSIUM NA 530 I ' PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ,UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
PHENANTHRENE NA 140J
PETROLEUM PRODUCT N
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
(M· AND/OR P·)XYLENE ', ..
2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS lOOJ
*************************************)**************************
***FOOTNOTES***
NA NOT ANALYZED
J · ESTIMATED VALUE
N · PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
· MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT N'oT DETECTED
I I
NH-003MB
GROUT
BLANK
04/15/91
1006
MG/KG
140
1. 6
2.2
. 5. 6
4.5
19
680
120
6.2
24
67
16000
450
16000
4600
8300
15000
1000
UG/KG
UG/KG
6.3J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX C
I PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV
'.345 COURTLAND STREET. N.E.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30365
January 23, 1990
'· SUBJECT: Preliminary Remediation·.Goals for-the New Hanover
County Airport Burn Pit Site.
FROM: Rebecca Fox~
Toxicologist
TO: Fred Sloan
Environmental Services Division
THROUGH: Elmer Akin~
Health Assessment Officer
Per your request, I have developed preliminary remediation
goals (PRGs) for.the New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Site.
The PRGs for soil and groundwater and the supporting
documentation are contained in the attached report.
Please contact me if you have any questions or if I c~n be of
further assistance.
Attachment:
cc: Jon Bornholm
Remedial Project Manager
Printed on Recycled Paper
I .. '•
I
1-
I
I
: ~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-,
I
I
I
I
I
I
PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION GOALS FOR THE NEW HANOVER COUNTY
AIRPORT BURN PIT SITE
The New Hanover County burn pit is part of an active airport
and was used from 1968-1974 for fire training exercises.
During this period, it has been estimated that 100 to 500
gallons of jet fuel were burned in the pit daily. The pit has
an area of approximately 1500 square feet and is surrounded by
a two foot earthern berm .. Water released from the pit was
allowed to flow onto the land. surface. The site soils are
sandy,with a rap.id~.ip.filtration · rate ... :;The,.surficial aquifer. is
approximately fiv:e'to seven 'feet· below· ground surface.
A removal action was performed at the.site in November·l990, in
which contaminated soil was removed from the burn pit, the
training areas and the supply tank. Site analytical data
.represents pre-removal conditions.
The purpose of this document is to develop chemical specific
preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) to assist in site decision
making. PRGs are concentration goals for site contaminants of
concern for specific medium and land use combinations. There
are two general sources of PRGs: (1) concentrations based on
ARARs and ( 2) concentrations based on ris_k assessment.
The first step in the· PRG process is to identify the media and
contaminants of concern. The media of concern at this site are
contaminated soil in and surrounding the pit and groundwater
which may be contaminated as a result of the leaching of
chemicals from the soil. The initial contaminant of concern
list contains chemicals which have been previously detected at
the site and chemicals that the site history indicates are
likely to be present. The contaminants of concern will be
modified as more site data is collected. Table 1 contains the
initial list of site contaminants along with the toxicity
values used in the risk calculatibns.
I Since the site is located on the property of an active airport,
it is felt that the most likely future land use for the site is
commercial/industrial. For this reason, the soil PRGs were
based on exposure assumptions for a commercial/industrial
future land use. However, the residential exposure assumptions
were used to address the groundwater pathway, since the closest
residential area is approximately 0.25 miles from the site and
if the groundwater is contaminated the plume could migrate
offsite to the residential area.
Initially, all possible ARARs were identified for the
groundwater pathway and presented along with the risk
associated with:the most likely ARAR concentration. Uhen ARARs
did not exist, risk-based concentrations were calculated using
standard default exposure assumptions. Figure 1 contains the
equations and the exposure assumpt'ions used to calculate the
health-based groundwater PRGs for the carcinogenic and
noncarcinogenic contaminants of concern. The risks associated
•••
1 ..
I
I
I , ... _,.-,
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. .
,
with:the·ARAR coriceritrations·were calculated by rearr:::.nging
these·,·eguations and solving for either the target risl: for
carcinogens or the target.hazard quotient for noncarcinogens.
Table 2 summarizes the potential groundwater ARARs, tlla risk at
the ARAR concentration, the risk-based concentration for
chemicals without ARARs and the contract required quantitation
limit (CRQL) for the preliminary contaminants of concern.
Since there are no ARARs for soil, the soil PRGs were based on
calculated health-based con~ntrations .. Soil.exposure which
was >cons ide:ted: under· ,the . commercial/industrial . scenario .. ·•.
evaluated --intake 'of cthe ··contaminant. by direct ingestion,
inhalation of volatile organics from the soil and inh~lation of
semi-volatile organic compounds absorbed to soil particulates.
The soil intake calculated from.these exposure pat~ways is
combined with the toxicity information contained in Table l to
·· develop risk-based PRGs. The equations and exposure
assumptions for the soil PRGs are contained in Figure 2. Table
3 summarizes the soil risk based PRG concentrations. Figure 3
and Table 4 contain information used in deriving the special
parameters for the soil-air pathway.
The PRGs contained in this report are initial PRGs based on
preliminary site information. The PRGs will be modified during
the RI/FS process to reflect the· data collected during the
remedial investigation. Modifications will be based on a
reevaluation of the media of concern, the contaminants of
concern, the land-use assumptions and exposure pathways,
toxicity information and potential ARARs. The modifi~d PRGs
will be contained in the baseline risk assessment and uill
better reflect the actual site conditions .. [The PRG
development was based on the Review Draft Guidance for Part B
of the Human Health Evaluation Manual (Development of
Preliminary Remediation Goals). The modified PRGs will also
reflect changes made in future guidance revisions.]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ll!ILII 1
C-:. ~~LIKDIARY COJffAK;HANTS OP .. COHCB.RH AND 'l'OIICITY IHP'ORMATIOB
:.• ---.-.
Bxposure Routes Inge■tion
Chemical Reference
Dose (RfD)
(mg/kg-day)
·~:..-. ,'_ .: ~-.
Ben~ene ':"· :-·.--:; (1:: ~---.-·, .. --. ..,!•;• ... ,.:.·
. Bthyl ~•nzene ur,..1,
2-]3utanone (NBI<) 5B-2
Methylene Chloride 6B-2 ..
Toluene 21-1
Xylene 21+0
Cn.rcinogeDic PilaD
Boncucinogenic PAHa
Acenapthene fiB-2
Anthracene 3B-1
Pluoranthmie 48-2
Fluorene 4B-2
Raph thalene 4B-3
Pyrene 3B-2
Other PAHa 4B-3b
Le~dc
Chromiumd 5B-3
Araenic 1B-3
!xposure Route: Inhalation
Benzene
Bthyl Benzene
2-Butanone (IIBX)
Methylene chloride
Toluene
lylene
Carcinogenic PAHaa
Honcarcinogenic PABa
Acenaphthene
Anthracen•
Fluoranthene
rluorene
■aphthalene
Pyrene
other PAila
Lead0
Chrom.i.umd
Arsenic
9B-2
88-1
68-1
9B-2
6B-7
Source
, .. .-x.~,-: __
.. :-:;_-._,~-... :.-: . IRIS. ,. -"· IRIS
_IRIS
IRIS·
IRIS
IIBAST
BBAST
IIBAST
HBAST
IIBAST
·IIBAST
IIBAST
IRIS
IIBAST
IIBAST
IIBAST
IIBAST
IIBAST -·
BBAST
Slope
Factor
(mg/kg-day)
. _:__.:)_
l-< :t
. :·d .
,2..9Bc2
.7 .58-:,3
l.lSB+l
1.8B+O
2.9B-2
1.4B-2
6.lE-+-0
4. lE+l
SE+l
-1
.'_;,
,
. ,
of
--·'
-·
Weight
evidence
.A
B2
B2
B2
A
B2
B2
A
A
Source
IRIS
IRIS
BCAO
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
BCAO
IRIS
IRIS
I.
I
I
I a
I
I b
I I
I d
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLB l (Cont.)
IRIS Integr~ted Ri ■k Information Sy ■tem
BBAST • Health Bffect ■ Summary Table
BCAO • Bnvironment~l Criteria and Aaaea ■ment Office
The alqpe factor for benzo(a)pyrene vaa uaed ·for all C11rcinogenic
PAHa. The follOWing PAB~-which are contained on the target compound
liat are cla■■ified aa carcinogenic; benz(a)anthracene,
benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, chryaene, dihenz(a,h)
anthracene and idono(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene.
The reference doae for naphthalene waa uaed for noncarcinogenic PAB■
which do not have an Agency verified RfD.
The Agency baa no verified toxicity values for lead. The Agency ia
recoanending that lead be evaluated by incorporating ■ite specific
information into the lead Uptake/Biokinetic (UBK) model. The UBK model
vaa used to determine a ■oil lead PRG for this aite.
The toxicity value ia for huavalent chromium. The risk baaed·
calculations conservatively a■aume that all chromium la in the
bexavalent form.
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Carcinogenic
Risk-be.sod
PRC(mg/1)
f:arM1eters
TR
Pi_l)ure l
TR X BW X AT x 365 days/iear
Definition (units}
target u:ceaa individual lifetime ~ancer risk (unitleaa)
·. SP1 ·· · ":·~-J.nh~ation Can~er· ~~p~· .t.act~r ( (~./~g~~a~) ~i-j' ·
SP0 ~
BW
,..,,
SP
l<D
l<
IR0
IR.,
· ··oral cancer slope factor ( (mg/kg-dayr-1)
.~ult body.wigh·t (kg)·_
averaging time (yr■)
exposure frequency (day■/yr}
·•zpo■ure duration {yr■)
volatilization factor (L/m3)
daily inhalation rate (m3/day)
· daily vater in~••tion rate (L/day)
Bon-carcinogenic
Risk-based
PJ<G(mg/l) THO x BW x AT x 36S daya/Ha.r
Parameter■
'1'llll
-RfD0
R!Di
AT
IP
l<D
l<
IR0
IR.,
BIi
Definition (unit&)
target hazard quotient (unitleaa)
oral chronic reference doae (mg/kg-day)
inhalation chronic reference doae (mg/kg-daf
averaging-time (yr■)
exposure frequency (day■/yrJ
tmpeaure duration (yr■)
volatilization factor (L/m3)
da.ily inhalation rate (m3/day}
daily watar ingestion rate (L/day)
adult body vieght (kg)
.. ~bem.ical specific
chemical specific
70 kg (adul~ avera9e)
70 yra
338 daya/yr
30 yra (90th percentile at a resijence)
0.5 L/m3 {Andelman 1986Jb
30 m3/day
2 L/day
1.0
chemical specific
chemical specific
30 yra· (always equal to EC)
338 days/yr
30 yrs (90th percentile at a rasi_denc)
0.5 L/m3 (Andel.man, 1986)b
30 m3/day
2 L/day
70 kg (adult average)
a The residential ■cenario a■aum.ea that e.xpoSure to gro~ndwater occurs through int~ke from ing~stion and
inhalation of volatiles fr0m water. Intake from volatilea i■ con■idered only for chemicals that have~
b
Ba -5 . nry•a Law conatant of 1 x 10 or greater and a molecular weight of 200 g/mole or le•••
. : I
Andelman, J.B. •Total Exposure to Vela.tile Organic Chemicals in Potable water.• Significance and 'l'rc.a.~ent oC
I Volatile Organic Compound■,in Water Suppliea. H.H. Ram, R.P. Chriatman K.P. Cantor (Bda.J. Lewis PuL:ishera.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Chemical
~
Benzene
ARARa
State
MCL
ARAI!
concentration
(mg/1)
TABLB 2
Cancer
Risk at
ARAI!
2,BB-6
'--~.: --. ~~~. ·l,
O,OOl(PRG)
q,qo.5
2-Butanone(MBK)
. B~hyl Benz.ine
_Nethylene Chloride
Toluene
Xylenee
,Fl2£!.
State
·•State
MCLG
MCL
State
PMCL
State
MCLG
MCL
State
MCLG
MCL
Carcinogenic PAHs
Benz(a)anthrancene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chryaene
Di.benz(a,h,)anthracene
Ideno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Bon Carcinogenic PAiia
~ Acenaphthene
· Anthracene
·r1uoranthene
Plouor~ne
aaphtha.lene
Pyrene
2-methyl
naphthalene
Benzo(g,h,i)
-perylene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
0, 17 (PRG)
0,029(PRG)
0.7
0,7
0,005(PRG)
0.005
LO(PRG)
LO.
LO
0,4(PRG)
·10
10
6, 48-6
0,0002(PRG) 2,6B-5
-
BQ at
ARAI!
0,5
0.008
0.003
0.2
0.3
"
Risk-based
concentration (mg/1)
10-6 Ri&k HQ• l
8.01!:-6
2,2(PRG)
11.3(PRG)
l,5(PRG)
L5(PRG)
0,2(PRG)
l,l(PRG)
0.2e(PRG)
0,2e(PRG)
0,2e(PRG)
0,2e(PRG)
CRQL
·0.005
0.005
o.oos
o.oos
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0,01
0.01
0.01
I
I .-
1-
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!WILB 2 (cont.)
·~el~ary GrolJndvater Remedlatioil~Goala
Chemical llARa .lllAR
concentration
(mg/1)
Cancer
Risk at
ARAI!
BQ at
llAR
Risk-baaed
concentration (mg/l)
CRQL
10-6 Riek BO -1
l.ead' , .. • d Buperl'und·--·:.· 0.015(PRQ) o.oos
State· o.os ·=-State 0.0S(PRG) 0.03 0.01
NCL 0.10
&nenic State 0.0S(PRG) 1.08-3 1.3 0.01
NCL o.os
CBQL • Contract Required Quantitation limit. Thia 1a the quantitation limit required by the contract
Laboratory progr_mn. If additional aenaitivity 1• needed to measure the PRG level, consult a regional
analytical chem.i.at. ·
NCL • Kazimum Conteminant Level
IICUl
PHCL
WC
8VOC
•
_l>
C
• Jla:l:imum Contaminant Level Goal
• Propopaed llCL
• Volatile Organic Compound
Bemi-Volatile Organic Compound
!2le firet ARAB. liated for each chemical is the moat atringent ARAR and therfore the AR.AR which ia
■elected ae the PRG. ~e risk calculations are baaed on this ARAR concentration.
The PRG ia baaed on a proposed MCLJ ~herefore a risk-baaed concentration has also been calculated.
Based on RfD for napb~alene.
'!'bis concentration baa been recommended as a cleanup level for lead in groundwater by the EPA Superfund
Office.
I
I .-
I
I '}~;~~:·
I
I
1,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Piguro 2
9011 Pita Squation■ tor Comercial/Indu■trial Land D■••
Carcino9enic
Ri■k-bued
PRG(mg/l)
Parameters
TR
S1'1
Sl'o
av
ll
IP
ID
Pl!'
·n Z aw x AT x 365 day■/year
pefinit!.Oft (Unit'■)
target axe••• individual lifetime cancer ri■k (unitle■■)
inhalation cancer ■lope factor ('(mq/k9-day)-l)
oral i:anc■i--■i~:factor ( (mg/kg-day)-l)
adult body -1ght (kg)
averaging ti.me (yr■)-
azpo■u.re frequency (day■/yr)
ezpo■ur■ duration (fr■)
■oil ing■■tion rate (mg/day)
inhalation rate of aJ.r (m3/day)
volat1;1zation ~ac::tor (m3/kg)
r■spirabl■ particulate em.i■■ion !actor
H~n-carcino9■nic
Ri■k-bued
PRG(mg/l)
THi ! BW x AT X 365 day■/v•ar
parameter■
TBQ
,av
AT
IP
ID
lltD0
atD1
IR■oil
IRair
VP
PIP
Definition runit•I
target hazard q,,iotiant (unitl■■■l
adult body -ight (kg)
a•era9in9 time (yr■)
apooun, fnquoncJ (cla7a/yr)
expo■llft daration (yr■)
oral nf-dooo (a;/kg-dayl
inbalatioc reference da■• (mc;/k9-day)
-u l.Aqe&&i.o• rau l.1119i"F I
daily inhala~ion rate (m3/kq)
I 3 Yolatilization factor (m /kg) I re■pirable p~iculate lllli■■ion factor
chemical apecitic
chlllll.i.cal apecitic
7D kg
70 yr■
250 day■/yr
40 yr■
50 mg/day
15 m3/day
l'igur■ 3
5,·2 x 107 m3 /kg (P1,;ur• 3)
1,0
70 kg
40 yr■ (alway• equal to !0)
250 daya/yr
40 yr■
chemical ■pacific
chemieal apecifie
50 mg/day
l5 m3/day
Figure 3
7 3 5.2 x 10 m /kg (Figure 3)
• i I Th• VP t■rm vu u■ed to . .,,aluat■ the air pathway f9r volatil• organic com:pound9. 'fh■ RP term vaa uaed to ■ati
air contUU.nan~ inta.k.e for th■ particulat■ pathway.
I
I
I
I
I
n
8
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
! I
I
Chemical
volatile organic Compounds
Benzene
Bthyl benzene ..
,2-Butanone
· · · Methylene chloride ..
..:.,_.'l'oluena
Xylene_■
Semi-Volatile Organic Compoundg
Carcinogenic PABa
Benz(a)anth.ral1cene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Cbrysene
Dibenz(a,h,)anthracene
Ideno(l,2,3-c,d)pyre"ne
Boncarcinogenic PAHa8 ·
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Pluoranthene
Fluorene
· Naphthalene
Pyrene
2-methyl naphthalene
Benzo(g,b,i)perylene
Phenanthrene
Inorgnnica
Araenic
Chromium
Lead
• Baze.rd Ouotient
Table 3
Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals
Riak-based Concentration (mg/kg)
10-6 Riek HQ• 1
4.DB-l(PRG)
. 1.SB+O(PRG)
3.lB-l(PRG)
1.7B+O(PRG)
1.5B+lc(PRG)
2.0B+S8 (PRG)
2.SB+3(PRG)
8.7B+3
7.9B+3(PRG)
3.0B+3(PRG)
l.2B+~(PRG)
6.1B+S(PRG)
B.2B+4(PRG)
8.2B+4(PRG)
8,2B+J(PRG)
6.18+4(PRG)
8.2E+3b(PRG)
B.2B+3b{PRG)
B.2e+3b(PRG)
2.1B+2
S.OR+2d(PRG)
CRQL • Contract Required Quantitation Limit
CROL (mg/kg)
SR-3
SB-3
~B-2
's2·.:3
SB-3
SR-3
J.3E-l
J.31!!-l
J.3E-l
J.3E-l
3.JE-1
3.3E-l
3.lB-1
J.3E-l
3. 3E-l
3.3E-l
a There i■ not an Agency-verified inhalation RfD for this compound or compounds. The PRG is based on the
oral ~xpoaure route.
b
C
d
Tt'lere la not an
napththalene.
. I
agency-verified
I
RfD for thia ' compound.
I
The PRG ia baaed on the oral RfD for
There i■ not an Agency-verified oral slope factor
baaed en the inhalation aiope factor.
for this compond. The carcinogenic risk-based PRG is
' I
There are no current Agency-verified toxicological values for which a protective soil cleanup level can
be developed. The PRC waa developed by using the BPA Optalc:e/Biokinetic (UBK) model for lead. The
model vaa run using the atandard ezpoaure default valuea incorporated into tbe model. The model ia
baaed on tbe expoaure of infant■ and young Children in a reaideotial ■cenario.
I
I • 1 CJ u r • 3
•qaation ■ .for Special Parameter• for the Soil-Air Patbvay
I Yolat111,,s1sn rester 1vr,
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
vr
parameter
vr
LS.
V
11B
-A
Doi • " .. alpha
. Po
'f
0C
Di
B
ltd
"oc q
J,S !i YI NB
A
Definition {unit•)
z
YOlatilization facu,r cm3/kg)
widt.b of cont~•~e:d area (m)
Vind ~ in mizing aone Cal• I -..
al.zing height C•I
f 3 , 1 4 ,:
araa of contudnation (ca2 )
effective diffu■iYity ccm2/■I -
aoil poro■ity {unitl■■■)
11011/a.1.r parition coefficient (CJ ■oil/c:m3 , air)
(Dei Z Sl/((S + p 0 (1-Sl!/ltul(cm2 /■I
· true aoil dan■ity (g/ca )
apo■ur■ 1.nt■nal (■)
organic carl:lon ooatant of aoil (parc■nt)
-,1eculu d.iffu■ivity (ca.2/a) llatlry'■·lav con■tant (atm-m3Jaol)
aoil-water partition coefficient (9/cm3 ) . 3 orvanic-carbon partition c:oeffici■nt {g/cm )
convv■ion factor· (k;/9)
Particulat• gi■■ion pactor for aapplrablt PHticl•■ fPK10>
nr •
P&r?!tfl
LS
V
NB
A
_o.03'
V
u,.
Di
PC•I
LS J( V • NB z ]600 1/hr
A
Plfinltion (unit■)
width of contaminaad area (m)
wind ~ in milting aon■ (a/■I
al.zing height '(■I . 2 area of contamination (11 I
reapirable fraction (9/1D2-hrl
z
traction ot •evetat1•• cover_ (unitle■■)
M■n annual wind ■pNd (a/■I
thnabold viDd ~ (a/el-..
function d: ; 1 nt: OA 0•/1Jt (unitl•••)
' perault rarticulatt ,,,,1.op DSS:9rd
nr •
alpha
JC & ••
t>etaul t
..... ". 2.25 a/a
2 ID
20,250,000 ca2
o1 z ■
0.35
8/S:d :s 41
calculated
2.n gtcm3
9.5 z 108■
1•
chcical apecific b
chmllical apecific b
either cb-.ical specific or Koc: x oc b,c
chaaical apecific
0.001
1000 a/ks
P!tault.
45.
2.25 a/a
2 ID
2025 1D2
0.03'
0
4.5 ml•
7,5 ml•
o.t
• Th• or;■nic contant of tb• 11011 vu con■enatively u■umed to tie 1 perc■at baaed on the ■andy nature of
tb• ■it• aoil.
b
C
d
'ftl• chemical apecific lllfonu.tion uaad to d■tenLJ.ne vr v&luea and the corr■aponcUng VP value■ are
contained 1n Table,.
'ftl• t:4 vu calculated b&a.ci on the koc ■nd oc.
ft■ default nr •alu■ vu uaed to deterai.n■ tb■ riak bued naa.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ll!ILB 4
PRBLINI&ART COBTAMIBAHTS OP CONCBRN AND TOXICITY INFORMATION
Chemical H
(atm-m3/mol)
, .... !. , .•
Benzene ' -·· ;g :.32B-'2 . 6.4B+l 5.43B-3: 1.04B+l
. Bthyl Benzene 7.SB-2 l.4B+3 7.90B-3 4.528+3
2-Butanone . B.lOB-2 . 4.5 B+O 2. 74B-5. , .. 4.148+3
Methylene chloride .. l.OOB-1 8.78+0 2.575B-3 1.718+3
Toluene 8.70B-2 2.68+2 6.61B-3 1.98B+l
Iylene
•
b
B
. .,..
---
7.858-2 1.4E+3a 6.29B-3b 4.968+3
·-.
Value repreaenta an average of o, p and m xylene.
Value represents an average.of o and m xylene.
Molecular diffusivity in air. Value ■ obtained from BPA Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series, Volume ·11, Estimation of Baseline Air Emissions at Superfund Sites. August 1990.
BPA-450/l-89-002a.
Organic-"carbon partitition coeU'ie-1.ent derived from log lt:0c valuea. Log Koc valuea obtained
from training manual from the Superfund University Training Inatitute {SUTI) workshop entitled,
Transport and Pate of Contaminants in the Subsurface, September 1990.
Benry•s lav conatant. Valuea were obtained frotn the SUTI training manual referenced above.
Volatilization Pactor. Value vaa derived from equation contained in Pigure 3 •
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX D
WELL LOGS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A USEPA Region IV MWS-001 . Boring Log and Page ~ ESDIECB/HWS Well Cons true tion Details I of I
PROJECT #: 9/E-019 DRILLER: Charles Till, PG
SITE: New Hanover Burn Pit GEOLOGIST: Jonathan Vail
LOCATION: Wilmington, NC DATE: 04/11/91
~ !,! i=-w< (/) ~> SAMPLE :CC) .... o.a: o.o CJ GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM WELL SPECIFICA TlONS w~ "w OES!GNA TION (/) ·~ ~~ ::, 0 "'= "'
-5-NA i
.
. -~ Ii Top of Casing 2.83 ft above ground,
.
G ~ 0 -Concrete Pad 6" thick, 3 square
SM sUt y :;ANU, tan :, '
, Concrete to 1.5 ft BLS
' ?, ' 0' 0
~ ~ Volclay 1:1entonite Grout to . r/ -~ 2A ft BLS (10.2 lbs/gal) 4 "" C:<
_,. Bentonite Pellets to . ~-· 3A ft BLS
SM silty SAND, brown •' I-'" JC
Sand Pack to 15.5 ft BLS .
5 -Top of Screen ~4.8 ft BLS
~ . -
.
SM SANO, creamy white to
liffh\l!'.eo ~ . si y N with SP sand layers
. = Screen is 2' 0.010' Wir1
Wound Stainless Steel ASTM 304)
10-' Filter Pack is 20-40 Flint Sand,
i
=
cu•l.79
. I
I I
. ~ '
.
= 15-liottom Of screen fH4.59 ft
Bottom of Well ~14.88 ft BLS
Boring Terminated at 15.5 ft. Bottom of Boring ~15.5 ft BLS .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ft USEPA Region IV MWD-001 _ Boring Log and Page ~ ESDIECBIHWS Well Construction Details I oft
PROJECT #: 91E-0t9 DRILLER: Charles Till, PG
SITE: New Hanover Burn Pit GEOLOGIST: Jonathan Vail
LOCATION: Wilmington, NC DATE: 04/12/91
.., u :,: we ... --'> ~AMPLf S:e, V)
CL Cl> "'-ac "'-0 u GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM WELL SPECIFICATIONS
~~ :i:w OE lGNA ION :.., V) ..... :,
"':l "'
-5-
.. Iii 1 op of Casing 2.4 ft above ground,
.
0 -SM siltTi SAND, with SP sand iaxers ~-Td Concrete Pad 6" thick, 4 square
. Oriling performed with 6.25 0 ' Concrete to 2 ft BLS
hollow stem augers. 0 ' t 0 . '7 Volclar ~enttte Grout ho
/ -_, 15.5 f LS 10.6 IDs/gal
~ I/ . I/
/ /
,
5 -'
/ . /
/ / ./ >
/ /
' / . / / / / /
10-/ / /
.. / V . , -_. I/ I/
/ / . / /
/
,· /
' .
15-
/
i-::: ..'..
. Sand Pack to 28 ft BLS
.
. = 1 op of Screen @lT.59 ft BLS
' . I I 20-E Screen is 2' 0.010" Wire ·
' Wound Stainless Steel (ASTM 304) . . :_ .' Filter Pack is 20-40 Flint Sand, . cu=l.79
. =
.
25-E
.
. ~ • Bottom of Screen @27.39 ft BLS
~
PbRMEA -I CL i~
Hollow stem au~erinp t1ottom of Well ~,,.s, ft BIS
ILITY ' terminated at ~ f BLS . SAMPLE I 3" Shelby Tube ample collected
30-for permeabilitr analosis,
samtle interva 28-3 .5 ft _
~ . t1ottom ierminated at 30.5 ft BLS tlottom 01 ooring ~,u.5 ft BLS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ft USEPA Region IV MWS-002 Boring Log and Page ~ ESD/ECBIHWS Well Construction Details I ot I
PROJECT #: 9/E-019 DRILLER: Charles Ti/I, PG.
SITE: New Hanover Burn Pit GEOLOGIST: Jonathan Vail
LOCATION: Wilmington, NC DATE: 04/15/91
~ u r UJ-C ... -~> SAMPLE :E., (/) 0..., o.a: o.o u GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM WELL SPECJFICA TIONS ~~ Xu, 0ES!GNA TI0N (/) ...... ~~ :::, "'= "'
-5-NA
-
. -;-
'-i Top of Casing 2.83 ft above ground,
.
G ~ 0 -Concrete Pad 6" thick, 3 sciuare
SM silty !::iANU, with SP sand layers ~ b Concrete to 1.0 ft BLS
. i-s ,
' ,,:; Bentonite Pellets to 3.0 ft BLS
.·' ·· .. • ' . .' .·. . ·' .. •, :i -e'... Sand Pack to 15.5 ft BLS
-
5 --
= Top of Screen @4.94 ft BLS
L
L ..
I • I
-' ~
.
L
L
-E Screen is 2· o.01g• Wiri
Wound Stainless teel ASTM 304)
L
10-L L Filter Pack is 20-40 Flint Sand,
t cu•l.79
L . L
L
. t .
L
L L
L
. " L L
L
I L L
I L
L
' L
15-I ii L_ 0 01 tom nf c::cr n la\4.F:7 ft
Bottom of Well @14 .88 ft BLS
. l Boring Terminated at 15.5 ft. Bottom of Boring @15.5 ft BLS
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A USEPA Region IV MWD-002 Boring Log and Page ~ ESD/ECB/HWS Well Construction Details I of/
PROJECT #: 9/E-019 DRILLER: Charles T//1, PG
SITE: New Hanover Burn Pit GEOLOGIST: Jonathan va,1
LOCATION: Wilmington, NC DATE: 04/16/91
~ u ::c w-< .... -~> SAMPLf 'i'e, If> .... a.ac o.o u GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM WELL SPECJFJCA TJONS w~ Xw OES!GNA ION :~ If> ...... ::, 0 "'"' "'
-5-NA .
.
.
; ~ Top of Casing 2.79 ft above ground,
G'; ~ 0 -SM , ~lt{i SAND, with ~r sand la~ers Concrete Pad 6" thick, 3 sQuare :,
. riling performed with 6.25 o, p Concrete to 1.5 fl BLS
hollow stem augers. ~ ~ . Volclay ientonite Grout to 14.0 f LS (10.2 lbs/ gal)
. j
/ /
5 -I/ / / /
. / ,,,: /
,
/ , . . .•
,,
I; 10-,
/ . / ,
':-,
. ,/
I/ I~ . /
~ ,/
. .:... sand Pack to 21:, flt!Ls
15-
.
.
. ;::._ 1 op of Screen 15'17.27 ft BC:S
.... .... .... . ....
20-' I= Screen is 2' o.01g-Wir1
I .... Wound Stainless teel ASTM 304) . ....
I
.... .... Filter Pack is 20-40 Flint Sand, .... . .... cu•l.79
I ~ . .... .... .... . .... .... ....
25-.... .... ....
. E . . Iii ~ Bollom of Screen @27.00 fl BLS
Boring TerminateCI at 27 .5 ft BLS \ 6,,11••t1om of WPII 7."I fl DI c . Bollom of Boring @27.5 fl BLS
30-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A USEPA Region JV MWS-003 _ Boring Log and Page ~ ESD/ECBIHWS Well Construction Details 1 of 1
PROJECT #: 91£-019 DRILLER: Charles T//1, PG
SITE: New Hanover Burn Pit GEOLOGIST: Jonathan Vail
LOCA TJON: Wilmington, NC DATE: 04/13/91
-' u :,: W< .... --'> ~•-•tr :i:e, CJ)
0." ~"' ~o u GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM WELL SPECIFICA TJONS ~~ xw OE IGNA ION CJ) ...... ~-' :, "':E "'
-5-' NA
-
-~
~ i Top of Casing 2. 70 ft above ground,
.
-
0 -B ;g Concrete Pad 6" thick, J sQuare
SM silty SANO, dark black 0 ,· Concrete to 1.0 ft BLS
1 l
'/ '/ Volclay Bentonite Grout to .. , I;.,;: 2.0 ft BLS (10.1 lbs/gal) //
" ,., -7. ~ ,• , B_entonite Pellets to ~-· .. , 3.0 ft BLS ~-·. :.....: -Sand Pack to 17.0 ft BLS
5 --~ Top of Screen @5.07 ft BLS
-SM silty SAND, Clark brown, with SP sand layers ----. ---
-
-~ Screen is 2' O.Olg' Wiri
' Wound Stainless teel ASTM 304)
10-I '-'-' Filter Pack is 20-40 Flint Sand,
I I C cu•l.79 ~
'-. '-'-'-
I E . '
'
~ ~ -'-. '-'-t:
-~ 15-' -Aofinm nfScreen @14.80 ft
.··.· Bottom of Well @15.01 ft BLS
-
' .' .
Boring Terminated at 17 .0 ft. Bottom of Boring @17.0 ft BLS
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A USEPA Region IV MWS-004 Boring Log and Page ~ ESD/ECBIHWS Well Construction Details I of I
PROJECT #: 9/E-019 DRILLER: Charles Till, PG
SITE: New Hanover Burn Pit GEOLOGIST: Jonathan Val1
LOCATION: Wilmington, NC DATE: 04/13/91
~ !,! :,: w< "' .... -~> SAMPfy; ""' ..... ~ac ~o u GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM WELL SPECIFICA Tl9NS ~.!! xw OESIGNA ION :~ "' ...... ::, "'= "'
-5-NA
-~j Top of Casing 2.75 ft above ground,
. I
-~ 0 -Concrete Pad 6" thick, 3 sQuare G SM silty SANO, with SP sand layers 0 ~ -' Concrete to 1.0 ft BLS I ~ ' ·'/ '/ Volclay Bentonite Grout to / "/ 2,0 ft BLS (10,3 lbs/gal) 4 •"(_
, .... Bentonite Pellets to . ' 3,0 ft BLS
, ~ I-Sand Pack to 16,0 ft BLS
,
5 -I-.... Top of Screen @5.02 ft BLS .... ' .... .... .... ....
I I:
-.... .... .... ....
. I: ' ' .... .... .... .... . .... Screen is 2' o.01g-Wiri ~ Wounel Stainless teel ASTM 304)
10-Filter Pack is 20-40 Flint Sand, .... .... cu•l.79 .... .... . .... .... .... t .... .... .... ....
, E ' ~
,
!
15-: ill L.... Rot tom of ~er n 01,4.]t; fl
I Bottom of Well @14,96 ft BLS
-Boring Terminated at 16.0 ft. Bottom of Boring @16.0 ft BLS
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A USEPA Region JV TB-01 Boring Log and Page ~ ESD/ECBIHWS Well Construction Details I of I
PROJECT #: 9/E-019 DRILLER: Charles Till, PG
SITE: New Hanover Burn Pit GEOLOGIST: Jonathan Vail
LOCATION: Wilmington, NC DATE: 04/09/91
~ u i=-we ~> SAMPLf :i:c, "' 0.., ~a: ~o u GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM WELL SPECIFICATIONS u,<> >:w OESlGNA ION ::~ "' o-.. ~ => "':!a "'
0 -r-:-:--'.""'" 8 \ Black sandx LgAM, root zone. r No Well Installed. . rillino bv ' lat Auaer, . SM silty fine SANO, black an<J grey . . .. .
5 -SM silty fine SANO, yellow-tan-white, wet at 5 ft. . . . SP fine SANO, non-plastic white
.
10-' . . . SM siltO jjANp, with SP sand layers .
15-UA 13 Unable to continue drillin.9 with . slat auger due to cave ,n . . Drilling continued with mud rotary.
.
20-
. .
25-. . . . . CL silty CLAY, firm, light to dark grey
30-. . . I . I
35-SP i fine SANO I . .
.
40--.·.·1= Sf. SAND and CLAY lenses . CL . SP medium to coarse grained Quartz SANO . light grey
45-
.
50-.
.
I I .
55-.
' .
60--NX CORE , Auner Refusal NX core to 65 ft.
=X
BARREL sandy fossiliferous LIMESTONE, r
SAMPLE ·nhos'nhatic calcite. 60-61 ft. -
R fossmferous LIMESTONE, .
65--calcite. 61-62 ft.
1san<ly fossiliferous LIMESTONE, . calcite. 62-62.5 ft.
,fossiliferous LJ~Sft' ONE, calcite. 62.5-6 ft. .
70-Boring Terminated at 65 ft.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ft USEPA Region IV TB-02 Boring Log and Page ~ ESDIECBIHWS Well Construction Details I of/
PROJECT #: 91E-019 DRILLER: Charles TIii, PG
SITE: New Hanover Burn Pit GEOLOGIST: Jonathan Vail
LOCATION: Wilmington, NC DATE: 04/11/91
~ u :,: UJ< ... -~> 5AMP1f %<!) V, .. ., .. ., "-o u GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM WELL SPECIFICATIONS u,G> '""' OESIGNA ION .. ~ V, c-..... a: :::, "'as "' I
0 -NA SM ~lty SANO dark Clack No WeU Installed . ·-or1ng per\ormed with 4" solid stem auaers to ascertain depth . of clay ayer ac~oss site .
.
.
SM silty SANO, dark brown with SP
5 -sand layers
.
I . .
.
10-
.
.
. .
. .
.
15-
.
.
.
20-
.
.
. I I
I I ' 25-' i ' . I
.
.
.
30-
.
. ~CL CLAY, blue-way retrieved w1 h ~1• slat auaer
Boring TerminateCI at 32 ft
35-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ft USEPA Region IV TB-03 Boring Log and Page ~ ESDIECBIHWS Well Construction Details I of/
PROJECT #: 9/E-019 DRILLER: Charles Till, PG
SITE: New Hanover Burn Pit GEOLOGIST: Jonathan Vail
LOCATION: WHmington, NC DATE: 04/11/91
~ ~ ::c w< V, .... -~> SAMPLE :C<O .. " "-ac "-o u GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM WELL SPECJFJCA TIONS w.!! >:w OESIGNA TION ~~ V, '
0 "'~ ::, "'i'a "' '
0 -NA SM ~ilty SANO, with SP sand layers No Well Installed
-ormg performe<l with 4" solid stem au8ers to ascertain depth of clay ayer across site . .
.
.
5 -
.
.
.
.
10-
-
-
-
.
15-
.
. ' ' -
-
20-
.
.
.
25-CL I CLAY, blue-gray
' _Boring Terminated at 26 ft '
' ' '
' I
.
30-'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX E
I AQUIFER CHARACTERISTICS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
An estimate of the hydraulic characteristics of the surficial aquifer such as
transmissivity (T), hydraulic conductivity (K), and the ground water flow
velocity (v) were calculated for the site. Certain field condition
assumptions were made in the selection of the method of analysis to be used.
The raw data follows the text. The mathematical formulas are based on the
following assumptions and may be found in Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping
Test Data, (Kruseman and de Ridder, 1989):
• "The aquifer has an apparently infinite areal extent.
• The aquifer is homogeneous, isotropic and of uniform thickness over
the area influenced by the pumping test.
• Prior to pumping, the piezometric surface and/or phreatic surface are
(nearly) horizontal over the area influenced by the pumping test.
• The aquifer is pumped at a constant discharge rate.
• The pumped well penetrates the entire aquifer and thus receives water
from the entire thickness of the aquifer by horizontal flow.
• The aquife,r is unconfined.
• The flow to the well is in unsteady state.
• The water removed from storage is discharged instantaneously with
decline of head, i.e. there are no delayed yield effects.
• The well diameter is extremely small, i.e. the storage in the well can
be neglected."
Transmissivity and the storage coefficient were calculated from the time-
drawdown graph (Figure E-1) using the following mathematical formulas
(Driscoll, 1986):
264 Q
T -
!J.s
where: T -t~ansmissivity, in gallons/day/foot (gpd/ft)
Q -p(ll!lping rate, in gallons/minute (gpm)
!J.s -drawdown across one log cycle, in feet (ft)
264 (1.8)'
T ------l, 105 gpd/ft
(0.43)
Converting to ft2/day we get:
l, 105 gpd/ft
T ---------148 ft2/day
7 .48 ft3/gallon
0. 3 T to
s -
r2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
where: S -storage coefficient (dimensionless)
T ~ transmissivity, in gallons/day/foot (gpd/ft)
t 0 -intercept of straight line at zero drawdown, in days
r 2 -distance to the observation well, in feet (ft)
0.3 (1,105) (5/1440)
s -- 5 .1 X 10-3
225
Using the value of T derived from the above calculation, the hydraulic
conductivity can be calculated through the following relationship (Freeze and
Cherry, 1979):
T
K -
b
where: K -hydraulic conductivity, in ft/day
T -transmissivity, in ft2/day
b saturated thickness of the surficial aquifer, in ft
148
K - -6.7 ft/day
22
Velocity of ground water flow in the surficial aquifer can now be calculated
from the following Darcy expression:
KI
V -
where: v velocity, in ft/day
K -hydraulic conductivity, in ft/day
I -pydraulic gradient, in ft
¢ estimated porosity, in percent
Using the maximum hydraulic gradient measured for the site (see Figure 3-3)
V -
(6. 7) (0.5/400)
0. 3
-0.0279 ft/day
We can convert to feet per year (ft/yr): v -0.0279 x 365 -10.2 ft/yr.
Transmissivity and the storage coefficient were also calculated from the
distance-drawdown graph (Figure E-2) using the following mathematical formulas
(Driscoll, 1986):
528 Q
T -
t.s
where:
I
I
T -t~ansmissivity, in gall'ons/day/foot (gpd/ft)
Q -pumping rate, in gallons/minute (gpm)
t.s -drawdown across one log cycle, in feet (ft)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
528 (1.8)
T ------l',080 gpd/ft
(0,88)
1,080 gpd/ft
Converting to ft2/day we get: T -
7 ,48 ft3 /gallon
-144 ft2 /day
0.3 T t
s -
r2
where: S storage coefficient (dimensionless)
s -
T transmissivity, in gallons/day/foot (gpd/ft)
t time since pumping started, in days
r 2 -intercept of extended line at zero drawdown, in feet (ft)
0.3 (1,080) (480/1440)
7. 5 X 10-3
14,400
The hydraulic conductivity can similarly calculated using the value of T
derived from the above calculation, through the relationship:
K -
T
b
where: K -hydraulic conductivity, in ft/day
T transmissivity, in ft2/day
K -
b saturated thickness of the surficial aquifer, in ft
144
22
-6, 5 ft/day
Velocity of ground water flow in the surficial ·aquifer is also calculated from
the Darcy expression:
KI
V -
where: v -velocity, in ft/day
K -hydraulic conductivity, in ft/day
I -hydraulic gradient, inf~
~ estimated porosity, in percent
I
also using the maximum hydraulic gradient measured for the site (see Figure 3-,
3)
(6.5) (0.5/400)
.v --0. 0271 ft/day
0,3
we can convert to feet per year (ft/yr): v -0,0271 x 365 -9.9 ft/yr.
- -·-- -l!!!!!!l!I 1!!11!1 -liiil -- - -- -
• •
• • .
• • • • • •
~ -I ' . ~ . ~ 5, . . . . . .
•
• • •
- - - -
--I
i
• • • . ----

-

-
--. .. 1-. ' j • • ' • • . ,.;.>_)
• j ~•~ .
. ·' .. . -·-• • I • • 1/ • ' ' -·· ' ' J I
-j • :t· . . E f' t t bl • -· ~-It. l .. n@ ,.
' ,
I ' f I • I
• • • . . ..
• I/ • • 1/ •
~ -;; ' • • • j , ,
•
1. e •
,e 100 1000. DISTANCE . FROM PUMPING \YELL (feet) .. •
I
I SE2000
Environmental Logger
05/08 19:51
I Unit{/ 248 Test 1
Setups: INPUT 1 ):NPUT 2 INPUT 3 INPUT 4 INPUT 5 INPUT 6 INPUT 7 INPUT 8
I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type Level (F) Level (F) Level (F) Level (F) Level (F) Level (F) Level (F) Level (F)
Mode TOG TOG TOG TOG TOG TOG TOG TOG
I I.D. MWD-01 011-01 M\IS-01 011-02 011-03 011-04 011-05 MIID-02
Reference 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
SG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
I Linearity 0.023 -0.005 0.013 0.004 0.009 0.004 0.011 0.008
Scale factor 30.799 9.978 10.008 9.999 10.016 9.943 10.010 10.005
Offset -0.050 -0. 013 -0.001 0.032 0.013 -0.016 -0.006 -0.001
I Delay mSEG 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000
Step 0 05/08 09:37:46
I Elapsed Time INPUT 1 INPUT 2 INPUT 3 INPUT 4 INPUT 5 INPUT 6 INPUT 7 INPUT 8
--------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
0.0000 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.006 0.006 0.012 0.006 -0.003
I 0.0083 1.195 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.012 0.006 0.003
0.0166 -0.087 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.009 0.015 0.009 0.003
0.0250 0.553 0.006 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.015 0.006 0.003
0.0333 0.379 0.000 0.003 0.003 0.009 0.015 0.006 0.003
I 0.0416 0.709 0.009 0.000 0.006 0.006 0.015 0.006 0.003
0.0500 0.758 0.000 0.006 0.003 0.006 0.015 0.006 0.006
0.0583 0.884 0.000 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.015 0.006 0.006
I 0.0666 0.952 0.009 0.003 0.006 0.006 0.015 0.006 0.006
0.0750 1.010 -0.003 0.006 0.003 0.006 0.018 0.006 0.006
0.0833 1.059 0.009 0.000 0.006 0.006 0.018 0.006 0.006
I 0 .1000 1. 205 -0.003 0.006 0.003 0.006 0.018 0.006 0.006
0 .1166 1.350 0.009 0.000 0.006 0.006 0.018 0.006 0.006
0 .1333 1.486 0.003 0.000 0.003 0.006 0.018 0.006 0.006
0.1500 1. 613 0.000 0.006 0.003 0.006 0.018 0.003 0.006
I 0.1666 1.749 0.009 0.000 0.006 0.006 0.018 0.006 0.006
0.1833 1. 856 : 0.000 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.018 0.006 0.006
0. 2000 1. 963 0.000 0.006 0.003 0.006 0.018 0.003 0.009
D 0.2166 2.089 0.009 0.000 0.006 0.006 0.018 0.006 0.009
0.2333 2.196 0.003 0.006 0.003 0.006 0.018 0.003 0.009
0.2500 2.293 0.012 0.003 0.006 0.006 0.018 0.003 0.009
0.2666 2.410 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.021 0.003 0.009
I 0.2833 2.517 ·0.006 0.006 0,003 0.006 0.018 0.003 0.009
0.3000 2.604 \0.012 0.003 0:006 0.006 0.021 0.003 0.009
0.3166 2. 711 0.009 0.000 0.003 0.006 0.021 0.003 0.009
I I 0.3333 2.798 0.009 0.003 0.003 0.006 0.021 0.003 0.009
0.4166 3.284 0.015 0.003 0.006 0.006 0.018 0.003 0.006
0.5000 3. 731 0.006 0.009 0.003 0.009 0.021 0.003 0.006
I 0.5833 4.120 0.012 0.012 0.003 0.009 0.021 0.003 0.006
0.6666 4.450 0.012 0.012 0.003 0.006 0.021 0.003 0.003
0.7500 4.742 0.022 0.012 0.006 0.006 0.021 0.003 0.003
0.8333 4.995 0.018 0.018 0.003 0.006 0.021 0.006 0.003
I 0. 9166 5.228 0.025 0.018 0.006 0.003 0.021 0.006 0.006
1.0000 5.461 0.025 0.022 0.006 0.006 0.021 0.006 0.009
I 1
I
1.0833 5.539 0.028 0.028 0.006 0.003 0.025 0.009 0.009
I 1.1666 5.801 0.031 0.031 0.006 0.006 0.025 0.006 0.009
1. 2500 5.937 0.022 0.044 0.003 0.006 0.025 0.006 0.012
1.3333 6.064 0.025 0.047 0.006 0.006 0.025 0.006 0.012
I 1.4166 6 .277 0.025 0.053 0.006 0.006 0.025 0.006 0.012
1.5000 6.443 0.025 0.060 0.006 0.006 0.025 0.009 0.015
1.5833 6.579 0.028 0.063 0.006 0.006 0.021 0.006 0.012
1.6666 6.754 0.034 0.063 0.009 0.003 0.018 0.006 0.012
I 1.7500 6.860 0.037 0.069 0.009 0.003 0.015 0.006 0.012
1.8333 6.958 0.031 0.075 0.003 0.003 0.015 0.006 0.012
1.9166 7.045 0.031 0.079 0.006 0.003 0.015 O.Oo'9 0.012
I 2.0000 7.133 0.034 0.085 0.006 0.000 0.015 0.009 0.015
2.5000 7.541 0.037 0.104 0.003 -0.009 0.006 0.000 0.000
3.0000 7.784 0.037 0.126 0.000 -0.012 0.000 -0.006 -0.012
3.5000 7,939 0.053 0.145 0.003 -0.009 0.003 0.000 -0.012
I 4.0000 8.124 0.066 0.161 0.006 -0.009 0.003 0.000 -0.012
4.5000 8.192 0.075 0.180 0.009 -0.006 0.009 0.003 -0.015
5.0000 8.192 0.081 0.186 0.006 -0.009 0.000 0.000 -0.009
I 5.5000 8.231 0.097 0.202 0.012 -0.006 -0.003 0.006 -0.015
6.0000 8.289 0.097 0.214 0.009 -0.006 0.003 0.006 -0.012
6.5000 8.299 0.113 0.224 0.015 -0.003 0.012 0.009 -0.009
I 7.0000 8.308 0.119 0.240 0.015 -0.003 0.009 0.006 0.000
7.5000 8.328 0.132 0.249 0.025 0.003 0.015 0.009 0.009
8.0000 8.367 0.135 0.246 0.025 0.000 0.012 0.006 -0.006
8.5000 8. 396 0.144 0.243 0.025 -0.009 -0.003 -0.003 -0.025
I 9.0000 8.415 0.151 0.259 0.028 -0.003 0.003 0.003 -0.009
9.5000 8.405 ' 0.166 0.262 0.034 0.000 0.003 0.000 -0.003
10.0000 8.435 0.169 0.265 0.037 0.000 0.006 0.003 0.000
I 12.0000 8.590 0.223 0.290 0.053 0.000 0.012 0.009 -0.003
14.0000 8.610 0.245 0.306 0.066 0.006 0.018 0.015 -0.003
16.0000 8.648 .0.283 0.338 0.088 0.018 0.028 0.028 0.018
18.0000 8.648 0.298 0.347 0.091 0.006 0.018 0.025 -0.015
m 20.0000 8. 726 0.333 0.366 0.107 0.015 0.018 0.031 0.003
22.0000 8. 872 0.358 0.385 0.123 0.018 0.021 0.034 0.000
24.0000 8.843 0.374 0.391 0.123 0.015 0.018 0.028 -0.015
D 26.0000 8.804 0.405 0.401 0.129 0.025 0.028 0.041 -0.006
28.0000 8.920 0.424 0.417 0.151 0.028 0.025 0.053 0.009
30.0000 9.027 ,0_440 0.423 0.157 0.025 0.021 0.050 -0.009
32.0000 8,979 0.440 0.420 0.160 0.031 0.018 0.050 0.003 I 34.0000 8.988 0.456 0.420 0.164 0.022 0.018 0. 041 0.003
36.0000 9.008 0,484 0.439 0.179 0.037 0.025 0.059 0.012
38.0000 9.008 0.494 0.451 0.189 0.037 0.021 0.063 -0.003
I 40.0000 9.037 0.503 0.451 0.198 0.041 0.012 0.063 -0.018
42.0000 9.076 0.506 0.455 0.208 0,050 0.025 0.066 0.000
44.0000 9.086 0.519 0.467 0.227 0.060 0.025 0. 072 -0.009
I 46.0000 9.066 0.538 0.483 0.236 0.066 0.028 0.082 0.003
48.0000 9.066 0.534 0.477 0.230 0.056 0.009 0.072 -0.006
50.0000 9.173 0.541 0.483 0.236 0.056 0.006 0. 063 . -0.037
52.0000 9 .115 0.556 0.483 0.233 0.053 0.006 0.059 -0.015 :1 54.0000 9.202 0. 572 0.496 0.246 0.069 0.034 0.078 0.000
56.0000 9.222 0. 572 0.493 0.239 0.063 0.018 0.075 -0.009
58.0000 9.231 0.585 0.499 0.249 0.066 0.034 0.082 0.009
I 6_0 ,0000 9.251 0.601 0.508 0.258 0.075 0.040 0.091 0,025
62.0000 9.261 01,607 0.508 0.264 0.072 0.037 0.082 0,009
64,0000 9.261 0.619 0.518 0,2?4 0.075 0.034 0.097 0.000
66.0000 9.290 ol.623 0.527 0.280 0.085 0.031 0.094 0.000 I 68.0000 9.445 o'. 619 0.534 0.280 0.085 0.043 0.094 -0.003
70.0000 9.552 0.616 0.534 0.280 0.085 0.028 0.097 0.000
I 2
I -•~i;.-
72. 0000 9.630 0.638 0.553 0.290 0.088 0.034 0.104 0.006
I 74.0000 9.669 0.645 0.565 0.296 0.101 0.040 0.107 0.018 76.0000 9.610 0.638 0.553 0.293 0,091 0.018 0.088 -0.028 78.0000 9.620 0.645 0.553 0.299 0.094 0.025 0.101 -0,003 80,0000 9,630 0,657 0.562 0.305 0.094 0.034 0.104 -0.025 I 82.0000 9.649 0.670 0, 572 0.309 0.097 0.031 0.107 -0,003 84.0000 9.640 0.673 0.565 0.312 0,094 0.031 0.104 -0.006 86.0000 9,630 0.679 0.572 0.318 0,101 0.028 0 .119 -0.015
I 88.0000 9.688 0.695 0.581 0.328 0.107 0.028 0.110 0.012 90,0000 9.698 0.685 0.565 0.321 0.104 0.034 0.104 -0.028 92,0000 9,659 0.689 0. 581 0.331 0, 113 0.040 0.138 0.012
I 94.0000 9.620 0.695 0.584 0.334 0.116 0.028 0.116 -0.009 96.0000 9.640 0. 704 0.597 0.346 0.116 0.034 0.145 -0,028 98.0000 9.669 0. 720 0.606 0.353 0.126 0.047 0.145 -0,009 100,000 9,649 0.707 0.590 0.346 0.126 0.040 0.135 -0.015 I 110,000 9.591 0.730 0.613 0.369 0,142 0.053 0.157 0.015 120.000 9.591 0.755 .0, 635 0.375 0.148 0,043 0.173 0.025 130,000 9.503 0. 774 0.638 0.394 0.154 0.068 0.179 0,003
I 140.000 9.222 0, 774 0.635 0.403 0.164 0.059 0.173 0.009 150,000 9.319 0,786 0.663 0.413 0.170 0.056 0 .192 -0.003 160.000 9.367 0.742 0.619 0.397 0.158 0.037 0.167 -0.022 170.000 9.465 0.802 0.698 0.435 0.195 0.084 0.221 0.025 I 180.000 9,416 0.805 0. 692 0.444 0.199 0.087 0. 217 0.000 190.000 9.455 0.805 0.695 0.428 0.186 0,053 0.198 -0.018 200.000 9.494 0.827 0. 711 0.460 0.202 0.078 0.205 0.015
I 210.000 9.523 0.827 0. 717 0.457 0.214 0,078 0. 214 0.000 220.000 9.503 0.802 0.663 0.425 0.186 0.012 0.208 -0,069 230.000 9.503 0.821 0. 704 0.447 0.214 0.065 0.217 -0.037 240.000 9. 571 0.833 0.717 0.463 0.224 0.062 0.233 -0.009 I 250.000 9.581 0.846 0. 723 0.460 0.214 0,040 0.236 -0.037 260.000 9. 571 0.849 0.733 0.473 0.227 0.047 0.246 -0.018 270.000 9,523 0.865 0.742 0.485 0.230 0.056 0.246 -0,022
I 280,000 9.503 0,874 0,748 0,488 0.237 0,065 0.255 -0.028 290,000 9 .134 0.862 0,739 0.492 0.246 0,062 0.258 -0,028 300.000 9.290 0.859 0.739 0.492 0.252 0.065 0. 271 -0,018
a 310.000 9.397 0,877 0, 771 0.507 0.268 0.090 0. 277 -0.015 320.000 9. 513 0.890 0.767 0.514 0.265 0.094 0. 277 -0.018 330.000 9.533 0.887 0.761 0.504 0.259 0.040 0.271 -0.056 340.000 9.523 0.903 0. 777 0.520 0.281 0,075 0.287 -0,028 H 350.000 9.620 0.906 0.786 0.526 0.278 0.068 0. 296 -0,053 360.000 9.688 0.906 0.780 0,526 0.281 0.072 0.274 -0.059 370.000 9.591 0.962 0.846 0.558 0,300 0.134 0.328 0.034
,I 380,000 9.533 0,903 0, 793 0.539 0.300 0.081 0.290 -0.034 390,000 9,708 0.912 0.793 0.536 0.293 0.087 0.290 -0.047 400.000 9. 571 0.940 0,818 0.561 0.312 0.097 0.315 -0.022 410.000 9.542 0.934 0,812 0,551 0.319 0.100 0.315 -0.028 I 420.000 9.630 0.937 0.821 0.561 0.319 0.103 0.315 -0.034 430.000 9.640 0.956 0.850 0.583 0.341 0. 131 0.350 0,000 440,000 9,581 0.947 0.818 0.567 0.334 0.109 0.325 -0.025
I 450,000 9.542 0.962 0.840 0.583 0.331 0.106 0.328 -0.018 460,000 9.640 0,959 0.837 0.567 0.331 0.090 0.318 -0.031 470,000 9. 610 9.956 0.850 0.586 0,338 0.106 0.331 -0.028
I 480,000 9.620 0, 972 0.843 o.~02 0, 344 0.122 0.347 -0.031 I
I
I
I 3
I
I SE2000
Environmental Logger
05/08 19:57
I Unit{/ 248 Test 1
Setups: INPUT 1 INPUT 2 INPUT 3 INPUT 4 INPUT 5 INPUT 6 INPUT 7 INPUT 8
I --------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------------' Type Level (F) Level (F) Level (F) Level (F) Level (F) Level (F) Level (F) Level (F)
Mode TOG TOG TOG TOG TOG TOG TOG TOG
I I.D. MWD-01 OW-01 MWS-01 OW-02 OW-03 OW-04 OW-OS MWD-02
Reference 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
SG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
I Linearity 0.023 -0.005 0.013 0.004 0.009 0.004 0. 011 0.008
Scale factor 30.799 9.978 10.008 9.999 10.016 9.943 10.010 10.005
Offset -0.050 -0.013 -0.001 0.032 0.013 -0.016 -0.006 -0.001
I Delay mSEG 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 50.000
Step 1 05/08 17:38:22
I Elapsed Time INPUT 1 INPUT 2 INPUT 3 INPUT 4 INPUT 5 INPUT 6 INPUT 7 INPUT 8
------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------------------------
0.0000 9.562 0.978 0.840 0.592 0.341 0.109 0.344 -0.031
I 0.0083 9.552 0.978 0.843 0.592 0.341 0.109 0.344 -0.025
0.0166 9.552 0.969 0.846 0.592 0.341 0 .112 0.344 -0.028
0.0250 9.552 0.969 0.846 0.589 0.341 0.112 0.341 -0.028
I 0.0333 9.552 0.969 0.846 0.589 0.341 0.112 0.344 -0.022
0.0416 9,931 • 0. 969 0.846 0.589 0.341 0 .112 0.344 -0.028
0.0500 9.474 0.969 0.8§0 0.592 0. 341 0.112 0.344 -0.028
0.0583 9.309 0.969 0.850 0. 592 0.341 0.112 0.344 -0.025
I 0.0666 9.212 0.969 0.850 0.589 0. 344 0.112 0,344 -0.025
0.0750 9.125 0.969 0.850 0.592 0.341 0.116 0.341 -0.025
0.0833 9.047 . 0. 978 0.846 0. 592 0.341 0.112 0.344 -0.025
I 0.1000 8.891 ·o.975 0.846 0.592 0.341 0.112 0.344 -0.025
0 .1166 8.755 0.975 0.846 0.592 0. 344 0.112 0.344 -0.028
0.1333 8.619 0.975 0.843 0.592 0. 344 0.112 0.344 -0.025
0.1500 8.483 0.975 0.846 0.592 0.341 0.112 0.344 -0.025
I 0.1666 8.347 0.975 0.846 0.592 0.344 0.116 0.344 -0.025
0.1833 8. 221 ,0. 975 0.846 0. 592 0.341 0 .116 0.344 -0.022
0.2000 8.095 0.975 0.846 0. 592 0. 344 0 .116 0.341 -0.025
I 0.2166 7.978 0.975 0.846 0. 592 0. 344 0.116 0.341 -0.025
0.2333 7.852 0.978 0.846 0.592 0. 344 0.116 0. 344 -0.025
0.2500 7. 735 0.975 0.846 0.592 0.344 0.116 0.344 -0.025
I 0.2666 7.618 0.975 0.846 0,592 0.344 0.116 0. 344 -0.025
0.2833 7.511 0.975 0.846 0.596 0.344 0.116 0.344 -0.025
0.3000 7.395 0.975 0.846 0. 596 0.344 0.116 0.344 -0.022
0.3166 7.288 0.975 0.846 0.596 0.344 0.116 0.344 -0. 022
I 0.3333 7.181 0.975 0.846 0.596 0. 344 0.116 0.344 -0.022
0.4166 6.686 0.975 0.843 0. 596 0. 344 0.116 0.341 -0.022
0.5000 6.229 0.969 0.843 0. 592 0, 344 0.116 0.344 -0.022
I 0.5833 5 .811 0. 966 0.843 0.596 0. 344 0.119 0.344 -0.022
0.6666 5.432 0.959 0.840 0.596 0.347 0.119 0. 344 -0.025
0. 7 500 5.092 0.953 0.837 0.596 0.347 0.119 0.341 -0.022
0.8333 4,791 0.947 0.837 0.596 0.347 0.122 0.344 -0.025 I 0.9166 4.509 0.937 0.831 0. 592 0.350 0.122 0.344 -0.025
1.0000 4.256 0.931 0.827 0.592 0.347 0.122 0.341 -0.022
I 1
I
1.0833 3.994 0.918 0.824 0.592 0.350 0.122 0.344 -0.022
I 1.1666 3.731 0.912 0.818 0. 592 0.350 0.122 0.344 -0.025
1.2500 3.450 0.906 0.815 0.589 0.350 0.122 0.344 -0.025
1. 3333 3.255 0.896 0.809 0.589 0.350 0.125 0.344 -0.025
1. 4166 3.080 0.887 0.805 0.586 0.350 0.125 0.344 -0.025 I 1.5000 2.925 0.881 0.799 0.586 0.350 0.125 0.344 -0.025 1.5833 2.760 0.874 0.796 0.583 0.350 0.128 0.344 -0.028 1.6666 2.614 0.865 0.790 0.583 0.350 0.128 0.344 -0.025
I 1. 7500 2.478 0.859 0.783 0.580 0.347 0.128 0.341 -0.028 1.8333 2.351 0.852 0. 780 0.580 0.347 0.128 0.341 -0.025 1.9166 2.264 0.846 0. 774 0. 577 0.347 0.128 0.341 -0.022
I 2.0000 2.157 0.840 0. 771 0.580 0.347 0.128 0. 341 -0.025
2.5000 1.613 0.805 0.739 0.567 0.347 0.125 0.341 -0.031
3.0000 1.263 0. 777 0. 717 0.561 0.350 0.125 0. 344 -0.031
3.5000 1.039 0. 761 0.698 0.555 0.353 0.131 0. 344 -0.034
I 4.0000 0.884 0.739 0.682 0.545 0.353 0.125 0. 344 -0.028 4.5000 0.787 0. 723 0.666 0.536 0.347 0.125 0. 344 -0.022 5.0000 0. 709 0.698 0.647 0.520 0.341 0.119 0.337 -0.028
I 5.5000 0.670 0.695 0.635 0.517 0.344 0 .119 0.337 -0.031 6.0000 0.631 0.679 0.625 0.514 0.344 0.125 0.337 -0.034
6.5000 0.612 0.673 0.619 0.510 0.350 0.128 0.341 -0.034
7.0000 0.592 0.667 0.616 0.504 0.350 0.131 0.344 -0.034 I 7.5000 0.563 0.657 0.609 0. 504 0.350 0.131 0.347 -0.028 8.0000 0.534 0.651 0.606 0.498 0.347 0.128 0.344 -0.031 8.5000 0.524 0.645 0.603 0.495 0.350 0.131 0.347 -0.028
I 9.0000 0.515 0.638 0.603 0.492 0.347 0.128 0.347 -0.025 9.5000 a.sos 0.632 0.597 0.485 0.344 0.119 0.344 -0.025 10.0000 0.495 0.626 0.594 0.482 0.341 0.116 0.341 -0.025
12.0000 0.476 0.607 0.575 0.469 0.341 0.112 0.344 -0.025 I 14.0000 0.466 0.601 0.568 0.463 0.353 0.131 0.341 -0.028
16.0000 0.456 0.588 0.559 0.454 0.353 0.134 0.337 -0.025
18.0000 0.447 0. 572 0.549 0.447 0.347 0.125 0.334 -0.025
I 20.0000 0.447 0.560 0.540 0.441 0.344 0.125 0.331 -0.028 22.0000 0.437 0.553 0.534 0.438 0.350 0.134 0.331 -0.028
24.0000 0.437 0.544 0. 521 0.435 0.347 0.131 0.328 -0.025
: I 26.0000 0.437 ·0.534 0.508 0.432 0.341 0.137 0.322 -0.028 28.0000 0.427 0.522 0.496 0.425 0.334 0.125 0.315 -0.028
30.0000 0.437 0.519 0.493 0.428 0.334 0.128 0.318 -0.028 32.0000 0.427 0.509 0.483 0.422 0.331 0.128 0.315 -0.031 I 34.0000 0.427 .0.503 0.474 0.416 0.325 0.125 0.312 -0.028
36.0000 0.427 0.497 0.464 0.406 0.322 0 .119 0.306 -0.028 38.0000 0.417 .0.490 0.461 0.403 0.316 0.122 0.306 -0.028
i m
40.0000 0.417 0.487 0.461 0.397 0.312 0.128 0.306 -0.028
42.0000 0.417 0.487 0.461 0.397 0.312 0.128 0.303 -0.037 44.0000 0.408 0.478 0.455 0.391 0.309 0.125 0. 296 -0.031 46.0000 0.408 0.475 0.448 0.387 0.306 0.122 0.293 -0.034 I 48.0000 0.398 0.468 0.448 0.381 0.303 0.109 0. 277 -0.034 50.0000 0. 398 0.462 0.445 0.378 0.303 0.112 0.281 -0.031 52.0000 0.388 0.456 0.442 0.378 0. 306 0.122 0.287 -0.028
I 54.0000 0.379 0.453 0.436 0.375 0. 300 0.116 0.284 -0.034 56.0000 0.379 0.449 0.436 0.375 0. 306 0.125 0.287 -0.034 58.0000 0.379 0.443 0.429 0.375 0.306 0.122 0.284 -0.028
I 60.0000 0.379 0.440 0.423 0.369 0.303 0.119 0.281 -0.034 62.0000 0.369 0.440 0.423 0.369 0.306 0.122 0. 277 -0.031 64.0000 0.379 0,.434 0.417 0.365 0.303 0.122 0. 277 -0.031 66.0000 0.369 01.424 0.410 0.356 0.300 0.119 0. 271 -0.031 I 68.0000 0.369 0.424 0.410 0.356 0.300 0.122 0.265 -0.031
70.0000 0.369 0.421 0.410 0.356 0.300 0.122 0.262 -0.031
I 2
I
72.0000 0.359 0.415 0.404 0.350 0.297 0.122 0. 258 -0.031
I 74.0000
76.0000
78.0000
0.359 0.409 0.398 0.343 0.297 0.122 0.255 -0.031
0.349 0.399 0.388 0.337 0.293 0.119 0.249 -0.034
0.349 0.396 0.385 0.334 0.290 0.116 0.249 -0.037 80.0000
I 82.0000
84.0000
0.340 0.393 0.382 0. 331 0.290 0.116 0.243 -0.037
0.349 0.393 0.382 0.331 0.290 0.122 0.246 -0.031
0.349 0.393 0.382 0.331 0.293 0.125 0. 246 -0.028
86.0000 0.340 0.387 0.379 0.324 0.290 0.125 0.243 -0.031
I 88.0000
90.0000
92.0000
0.340 0.387 0.379 0.328 0.293 0.125 0.243 -0.031
0.330 0.374 0.360 0.318 0.287 0.125 0.239 -0.034
0.340 0.374 0.360 0.315 0.287 0.125 0.243 -0.031 94.0000
I 96.0000
98.0000
0.330 0. 371 0.360 0.312 0.287 0.122 0.243 -0.034
0.330 0. 368 0.360 0.312 0.284 0.119 0.239 -0.034 0.330 0.368 0.360 0.309 0.284 0.116 0.236 -0.031
100.000
I 110.000
120.000
130 .000
0.330 0.365 0. 360 0.309 0.284 0.119 0.236 -0.025
0.310 . 0. 352 0.353 0.305 0.281 0.125 0.230 -0.028
0.310 0.342 0.347 0.299 0.278 0.125 0.227 -0.025
0.310 0.333 0.344 0.293 0.278 0.125 0.214 -0.018
I
I
H
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I 3
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT .............. ·• ....... . •• PROJECT NO. 91-641 SAMPLE NO. 58171 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-01B-MW ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••• SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 05/07/91 0910 STOP: 00/00/00
05/17 /91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ·ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U · 12U 5.0U 5.0U
50U 5.0U 3.4J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
1 . 1 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
2.2· DICIILOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1. 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODJCHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
1. 2J
1. SJ 2.6J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.3-DJCHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1. 1 .1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-JXYLENE O·XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1 .1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 .2.3-TRJCHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DJCHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER.THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- --- - - - -
== lliiill - - - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-641 SAMPLE NO. 58171 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-01B-MW ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 05/07/91 0910 STOP: 00/00/00
-
05/17/91
• • • • •• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
30JN ETHYL ETHER SJN TRIMETHYLBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED .. THE NUMBER IS IHE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ............. ~ ........ . •• PROJECT NO. 91-641 SAMPLE NO. 58172 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-02B-MW ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 05/07/91 0925 STOP: 00/00/00
05/17/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U sou 5.0U
1. 7J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 7.7 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-0JCHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CJS-1 .2-DJCHLOROETHENE 2. 2 ·DI Cl ILOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRJCHLOROETHENE(TRJCHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U
1. SJ 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 7.4 7.9 14 s.ou 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U s.ou s.ou 5.0U 5.0U s.ou
CJS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-DJCHLOROPROPENE 1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 .1. 1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE CM-AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0 XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE
1 .1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 .2.3-TRJCHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1.3-DJCHLOROBENZENE 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTJTATION LIMIT.
------------------
------

-
-
MISCELLANEOUS PURG£ABL£ ORGANICS -DATA REPORT
---I!!!!!!!!!
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAG£M£NT SYSTEM
£PA-REGION IV £SD. ATHENS, GA.
liiii --

-
--
05/17/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-641 SAMPLE NO. 58172 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
•• STATION ID: NH-028-MW ..
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ••
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ••
COLLECTION START: 05/07/91 0925 STOP: 00/00/00 •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
200JN 10JN 20JN 60JN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
ETHYL ETHER
METHYLPROPANOL
ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS)
TRIMETHYLBENZENE (3 ISOMERS)
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PR£SUMPTIV£ £VIDENC£ OF PR£S£NCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 8£ LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATJON LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROJECT NO. 91-641 ' SAMPLE NO. 58173 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-03B-MW
• ••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 05/07/91 1030 STOP: 00/00/00
05/17/91
• • • ••• •• •• .. • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U sou 5.0U
1. 6J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 1.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1 ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2 DICIILOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1 .1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 ,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1. 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1 .3-0ICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 . 1 ·. 1 . 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-ANO/OR P-)XYLENE 0 XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1. 1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 .2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,4-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L7ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
-----------------
-------l!l!!l!!I liiii ---·----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROJECT NO. 91-641 SAMPLE NO. 58174 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
STATION ID: NH-04B-MW
• • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 05/07/91 1050 STOP: 00/00/00
••• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG~L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U sou 5.0U 0.51J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 1.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1, 1-DJCHLOROETHENE(1,1-0JCHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
1 ,1-0JCHLOROETHANE
VINYL ACETATE
CIS-1.2-DJCHLOROETHENE
2.2· OICIILOROPROPANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1 ,1-0JCHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
1 .2-0JCHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
1 .2-0ICHLOROPROPANE
OJBROMOMETHANE
BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
0. 77J
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1,3-0ICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE TRANS-1 .3-0ICHLOROPROPENE
1 .1,2-TRJCHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.3-0JCHLOROPROPANE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROBENZENE
1 .1,1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
(M-ANO/OR P-JXYLENE
O·XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE
1 .1 ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1 .2.3-TRJCHLOROPROPANE
0-CHLOROTOLUENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1.3-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1.4-0ICHLOROBENZENE
1 .2-0ICHLOROBENZENE
05/17/91
• • • •
• • • •
• •• •• •• • • .. ...
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-IIATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 05/17/91 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . • ................... . ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-641 SAMPLE NO. 58175 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• •• STATION ID: NH-05B-MW COLLECTION START: 05/07/91 1140 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U 10U ,OU 10U 10U 10U 100U 25U 10U 10U 10U 25U 10U 10U 64J 10U 1. 5J 10U 10U 10U 10U 31 10U 10U 10U 10U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1. 1-0ICHLOROETHENE(l .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DJCHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CJS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2 DICIILOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1 ,1-TRJCHLOROETHANE· 1. 1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE .BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DJBROMOMETHANE BROMODJCHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
10U 25U 2.5J 10U 10U 10U 10U 25U 10U 10U 10U 9.2J 3. 7J 5.4J 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U lOU lOU lOU 10U lOU
CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1 .3-DJCHLOROPROPENE 1 .1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1,3-DJCHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1. 1 .1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)KYLENE 0 XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1. 1 ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1 .2.3-TRJCHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1.3-DJCHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DJCHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2-D(CHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATJON LIMIT.
----------------
-- - - -- -
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT
-11!!!!!1 !!Im liiiil
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
- - - - -
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-641 SAMPLE NO. 58175 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-O5B-MW
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 05/07/91 1140 STOP: 00/00/00
-
D5/17/91
• • • • •• •• •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
20JN 100JN 40JN 20JN 30JN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
METHYLPROPANOL METHOXYMETHYLPROPANE DIMETHYL PENTANONE TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENE TRIMETHYLBENZ~NE (2 ISOMERS)
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGElll:NT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 05/17/91 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-641 ' SAMPLE NO. 58176 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-068-MW ••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 05/07/91 1145 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 250U 62U 25U 25U 25U 62U 25U 25U 250U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 2.7J 94 25U 25U 25U 25U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
2.2 DICIILOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1 ,1-TRJCHLOROETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRJCHLOROETHENE(TRJCHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
25U 62U 13J 25U 25U 25U 25U 62U 25U 25U 25U 30 60 22J 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U
CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1 .1 .2-TR!CHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1.1. 1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0 XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1 .1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 .2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
----------------
- -- - - - -
1!11!! == !ilia liiil -- - - - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 05/17/91
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORµANJCS -DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-641 SAMPLE NO. 58176. SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION JD: NH-06B-MW ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 05/07/91 1145 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
SOJN 100JN SOJN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
METHOXYPROPANOL METHOXYMETHYLPROPANE TRIMETHYLBENZENE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 04/11/91 PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ............. •.• ................... . •• PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE NO. 57013 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-<>04 PIEZ 1 ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1430 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS sou sou sou sou sou sou 3100J 120U sou sou sou 120U sou sou 500U sou sou sou sou sou sou 10U sou sou sou sou
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMfTHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE!l.1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1 ,1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FNTNeTES•••
sou 120U sou sou sou sou sou 120U sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou
c1s-1 ·. 3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1,1;1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(ltt--AND/OR P-)XVLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1 ,1 .2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE r 1.2-DICHLDROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
----------------
- ------- -
l!!!!!!!!I liiil --- - --
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 04/11/91
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE NO. 57013 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION IO: NH-004 PIEZ 1 ••
PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1430 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
2000JN
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
ISOPROPANOL
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-571 . SAMPLE NO. 57014 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-005 PIEZ 2
••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1435 STOP: 00/00/00
04/1) /91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L . ANALYTICAL RESULTS
25U 25U 25U 25U 2su 25U 680J 62U 25U 25U 25U 62U 25U 25U 250U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 5.0U 25U 25U 25U 25U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1 .1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1, 1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
25U 62U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 62U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U
CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1.1 ,1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL .BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1 ,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 ,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
--------------
- - - ---- - -
!!II!!! liliiiii - --- - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE NO. 57014 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-005 PIEZ 2
•••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1435 STOP: 00/00/00
04/11/91
• •••••• •• •• • • •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
300JN ISOPROPANOL
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-oo6 PIEZ 3 ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 04/11/91 ................. ~ ....................... ; ..... . • •• •• •• •• • •
NO. 57015 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1455 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
4.5J IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 2100J 4.3J IOU IOU IOU 25U IOU IOU 100U IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 1. 2J IOU IOU IOU IOU
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1.1-0ICHLOROETHENE(l.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1.1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
IOU 25U 10U 10U ,ou IOU IOU 25U 10U lOU ,ou IOU ,ou lOU lOU 10U IOU 10U IOU IOU IOU 10U IOU IOU
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE . TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-ANO/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1.1 ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 ,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• -•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NA!-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT.
-- - ----- - - - - - - - - -
----

-

-
-
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT
-----
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
------
04/11/91
•••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••• • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE NO. 57015 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
STATION ID: NH-006 PIEZ 3
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON.
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
04/09/91 1455 STOP: 00/00/00
•• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
700JN. ISOPROPANOL
/
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT .............. ~ .....
•• PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-007 PIEZ 4
• • • 57016
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
04/11/91
•• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1500 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • ••• •• •• ••
IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 510J 25U IOU IOU IOU 25U IOU IOU 100U IOU IOU 10U 10U 10U IOU 2.0U 10U 10U 10U 10U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(I ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 1 ,1-DICHLDROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1 ,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLDROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ ·1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
10U 25U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 25U 10U 10U 10U 10U IOU IOU 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U IOU IOU 10U 10U 10U
CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE . TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROIIOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 ,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 .2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-- - -- - -
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT
- - - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
- - - - - -
04/11/91
..................... •·• ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -• .......... . ••• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91--571 SAMPLE NO. 57016 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-007 PIEZ 4
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1500 STOP: 00/00/00 •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
200JN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
ISOPROPANOL
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 04/11/91
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE NO. 57017 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-008 PIEZ 5
•••••• UG/L
25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 890J 62U 25U 25U 25U 62U 25U 25U 250U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 5.0U 25U 25U 25U 25U
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUO-ETHANE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ
ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE .
VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1435 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • UG/L
25U 62U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 62U 25U 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU 2SU
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1.1.1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE .
BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1.1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
• • • •
• • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MI~IMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE NO. 57017 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-008 PIEZ 5
PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1435 STOP: 00/00/00
-
04/11/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
400JN
•••FNTNeTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
ISOPROPANOL
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
•
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE NO. 57018 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-009 PIEZ 6
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1505 STOP: 00/00/00
04/11 /91
• •• ••• •• •• • • • •
•• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • ••• l!G/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U -5.0U 5.0U 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U s.ou 5.0U sou s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 1.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENECl,1-DICHLDROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1.1 .1 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(It-AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1,1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 04/11/91
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-010 PIEZ 7 ••
NO. 57019 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
••• • • • ••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U CHLOROMETHANE 5.0U VINYL CHLORIDE 5.0U BROMOMETHANE 5.0U CHLOROETHANE 5.0U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 5.0U 1.1-0ICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) sou ACETONE 12U CARBON DISULFIDE 5.0U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 5.0U TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 5.0U 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 12U VINYL ACETATE
5.OU CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 5.0U 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE sou METHYL ETHYL KETONE
5.0U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 5.0U CHLOROFORM 5.0U 1.1,1-TR!CHLOROETHANE
5.0U 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 5.0U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1600 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 5.0U TOLUENE 5.0U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 5.0U 1 .1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
5.0U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.0U 1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
5.0U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
5.0U CHLOROBENZENE 5.0U 1 ,1,1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.0U ETHYL BENZENE
5.0U (M-ANDtOR P-)XYLENE 5.0U 0-XYLEN 5.0U STYRENE
5.0U BROMOFORM 5.0U BROMOBENZENE 5.0U 1, 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
5.0U 1 ,2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 5.0U 0-CHLOROTOLUENE 5.0U P-CHLOROTOLUENE 5.0U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.0U BENZENE --5,ou 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.0U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 5.0U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.0U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 5.0U. 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
5.0U DIBROMOMETHANE 5.0U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS••• •••REMARKS•••
• • • •
•
•• •••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N--PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANT!TATION LIMIT.
-
.EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-GW ••
-SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57262 S~MPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 0925 STOP; 00/00/00
04/27/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 20U 10U 10U 10U 10U 20U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 20U
10U · 10U 10U 10U 10U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1 .2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3,4.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE . 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-N IT ROAN I LI NE 2-NITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-N IT ROAN I LI NE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTIIRACENE BENZO(AJANTHRACENE BENZO(B ANO/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U lOU lOU lOU 10U lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU ,ou 10U lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU 20U lOU ,ou
10U
BENZOCGHl)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLDROETHYL) ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE 01-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE 01-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE CHCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO Cl .2.3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/D!PHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PYRENE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
------------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE CCIIPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
------
04/27/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57262 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
PROG ELEM: SSf COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ••
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ••
•• STATION ID: NH-001-GW COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 0925 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
•• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
20JN METHYLPYRROLIDINONE
10JN ETHYLOIMETHYLBENZENE(3 ISOMERS)
4JN TRIMETHYLHEMANOIC ACID
3JN METHYLBENZENEMETHANOL
4JN TETRAHYORONAPHTHALENE
4JN 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
3JN TETRAHYOROMETHYLNAPHTHALENE
10JN METHYLBENZENEACETIC ACID
20JN TRIMETHYLBENZOIC ACID(3 ISOMERS)
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERfERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED fOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANT!TATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY fOR VERlflCATION.
-
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-GW ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57262 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 0925 STOP: 00/00/00
05/20/91
• ••••• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.16U 0.16U 0.16U o.osou 0.16U o.osou 0.16U 0.16U 0. 16U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.62U 2.5U 2.5U 2.5U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANEJ DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDTJ 4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE) 4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD) ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 ( AROCLOR 1221 )
2.5U 2.5U 2.5U 2.5U 10U
o.sou 0.25U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCIILORDANE (OCTACIILOREPOXIDE) /2 METHOXVCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
----

-
--------------
--

-
----
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
----

-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
----
••• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . . ·• .................. . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57262 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
STATION ID: NH-001-GW
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
04/17/91 0925 STOP: 00/00/00
--
04/25/91
• • • • • •• .. •• •• ..
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU IOU 1DU IOU IOU IOU 100U 25U IOU IOU IOU 25U IOU IOU 100U IOU 2. 1 J 10U IOU IOU IOU 3.5J IOU IOU IOU IOU
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ
ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE
1 ,1-DICHLOROETHANE
VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2. 2-·DICIILOROPROPANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
IOU 25U IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 25U IOU IOU IOU 3.3J 3.0J 7.BJ IOU IOU IOU
10U IOU IOU IOU
10U IOU IOU
CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE TRANS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1 .1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROBENZENE 1,1, 1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0--XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM
BROMOBENZENE 1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57262 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-001-GW
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 0925 STOP: 00/00/00
04/25/91
• • • ••• •• •• • • • • ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
90JN ETHYL ETHER
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- - -- - - -
METALS DATA REPORT
- - ---
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
- - -- -
••• •• •• ••
............ • ................... .
PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57262 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-001-GW
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
-
05/03/91
• • •
•• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 0925 STOP: 00/00/00
••• •• •• ••
10U 30U NA
99 5.0U 5.0U 10U 82 21 10U 36 40U 30U 40U 25U 250 sou 180 100U
56 10U
52 NA 0.3U
52000
99
~~~~ij~c BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
25 3.2 12
37 3.2
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 05/07/91
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. '57262 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-GW
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 0925 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE G~EATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--ilATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•
-- --- --- - - - - - - - - --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57268 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1040 STOP: 00/00/00
04/27/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• STATION ID: NW-002-GW •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 2.3J 20U lOU 10U 10U 10U 20U 6.0J 2. 7J 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U -10U 10U 10U 20U 10U 10U 10U lOU lOU
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3.4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL·-4 .6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-NITROPHENOL 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANI LINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER -4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROAN I LI NE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTHRACENE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(B ANO/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
lOU ,ou lOU 10U 10U 10U 10U ,ou 10U 10U ,ou ,ou 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U ,ou 10U 10U lOU · 10U 10U 10U
10U 10U 20U ,ou ,ou 10U
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE N ITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PYRENE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-•
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
04/27/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • •• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57268 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• STATION ID: NW-002-GW COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 . 1040 STOP: 00/00/00 •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
20JN ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE(6 ISOMERS) 3JN DIHYDROMETHYLINDENE
4JN DIMETHYLPHENOL(NOT 2.4-J 6JN TETRAHYDRONAPHTHALENE 3JN DIHYDRODIMETHYLINDENE 20JN 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 20JN METHYLBENZENEACETIC ACID 5JN DIHYDRONAPHTHALENONE 40JN TRIMETHVLBENZOIC ACID(3 ISOMERS) 6JN DIMETHVLNAPHTHALENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER·THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. . •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - -
PESTICIOES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57268 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION IO: NW-002-GW
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1040 STOP: 00/00/00
05/20/91
• • • • ••• •• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0. 17U 0. 17U 0.30U 0.077U 0. 17U 0.077U 0. 17U 0. 17U 0. 17U 0.25U 0. lOU 0. lOU 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U
1 . 1 U 2.5U 2.5U 2.5U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOKIOE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINOANEJ OELTA-BHC ENOOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELORIN 4.4'-DOT (P.P'-DDTJ 4.4'-DDE (P,P'-DOEJ 4,4'-000 (P,P'-000) ENORIN ENDO~ULFAN II (BETA) ENOOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIKTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
2.5U 2.5U 2.SU 2.SU 10U
O.SOU 0.25U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOKAPHENE ·
CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLOROENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OKYCllLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOKIDE) /2 METHOKYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES Of TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT .. -....................... . ••• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57268 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NW-002-GW
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1040 STOP: 00/00/00
04/25/91
• • • • •• •• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 100U 25U 10U 10U 10U 25U 10U 10U 100U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 7.9J 10U 10U 10U 10U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
. ~~~ig~EDISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICIILOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 ,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-0ICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
10U 25U 2.0J 10U 10U 10U 10U 25U 10U 10U 10U 8.5J 9.3J 16 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U
c1s~1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE!TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 .1 ,1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE O·XYLENE . STYRENE BROMOFORM
BROMOBENZENE 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- - - - - --- - -- -- -- - - --
- - - -- --
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT
- -- - -
SAMPLE AND ANALVSIS MANAGEMENT SVSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
- - --- -
04/25/91
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57268 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-002-GW ••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1040 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
300JN BOJN lOJN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
ETHYL ETHER TRIMETHYLBENZENE (3 ISOMERS) ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. METALS DATA REPORT .............. ' ................... . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57268 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-002-GW ••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1040 , STOP: 00/00/00
05/03/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU SILVER 30U ARSENIC NA BORON 160 .BARIUM 5.0U BERYLLIUM 5 . OU CADM !UM IOU COBALT 72 CHROMIUM 17 COPPER 1 OU MOLYBDENUM 23 NICKEL 40U LEAD 30U ANTIMONY 40U SELENIUM 25U TIN 480 STRONTIUM SOU TELLURIUM 310 TITANIUM 100U THALLIUM 73 VANADIUM 17 YTTRIUM 53 ZINC NA ZIRCONIUM 0.3U MERCURY 56000 ALUMINUM 360 MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
22 CALCIUM 7.7 MAGNESIUM 28 IRON 37 SODIUM 4.8 POTASSIUM
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •MAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
•
----- --
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
-- ---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA~REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
------
05/07/91
••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57268 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY:• WILMINGTON . ST: NC •• STATION ID: NW-002-GW COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1040 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • ... . . . . . . . . . . . ~ .................................................... .
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE ·•NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS K~ TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS K~ TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ............ ·• ........... .
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57271 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-003-GW ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••• SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1120 STOP: 00/00/00
04/27/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
sou sou sou sou sou sou sou 42J 100U sou sou sou sou 100U sou 6. 1 J sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou 100U sou sou sou sou sou
(3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METllYL -·4. 6-DINI TROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-NJTROPHENOL 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTIIRACENE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•••FOOTNOTES••• .
sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou 11 J sou 100U sou sou sou
BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1 .2.3-CDJ PYRENE ISOPHORONE .
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PYRENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL·VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- - -- - - -- - - - -- --- - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS. GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COIPOUNDS -DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57271 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• STATION ID: NH-003-GW .COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1120 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
04/27/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
60JN 700JN SOOJN 40JN SOJN 40JN 200J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
DIMETHYLPHENOL(NOT 2.4-J TRIMETHYLHEXANOIC ACID TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENEDIOXIDE BICYCLOHEPTYL METHYLBENZENEACETIC ACID NAPHTHALJC ANHYDRIDE 2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R--QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY·NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION .
•
/
-
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT .............. •· ....... .
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57271 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-003-GW ••
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1120 STOP: 00/00/00
05/20/91
• •••••• •• •• •• •• f•· ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• -• •••••••••••••••••••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.61U 0.61U 0.61U 0.20U 0.61U 0.20U 0.61U 0.61U 0.61U 0.75U 0.75U 0.75U 0. 75U 0.75U 0.75U 3.SU 11 U 11 U 11 U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANEJ DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT {P.P'-DDTJ 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDEJ 4,4'-DDD {P,P'-DDDJ ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 {AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 {AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 {AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
11U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) 11U PCB-1248 {AROCLOR 1248) 11U PCB-1260 {AROCLOR 1260) 11U PCB-1016 {AROCLOR 1016) 30U TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCIILORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDEJ /2 1.SU METHOXYCHLOR 1.5U ENDRIN KETONE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57271
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
•• STATION ID: NH-003-GW ••
------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
----
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
04/17/91 1120 STOP: 00/00/00
----
04/27/91
• • • • • •• •• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 250U 62U 25U 25U 25U 62U 25U 25U 250U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 4.4J 110 25U 25U 25U 25U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE
BROM:JMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1.2~DICHLOROETHENE
1.1-0ICHLOROETHANE
VINYL ACETATE
CIS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE
2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1.1-0ICHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
1 .2-0ICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE-TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DIBROMOMETHANE BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
25U 62U 14J 25U 25U 25U 25U 62U 25U 25U 25U 34 59 23J 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U
CIS-1 .3-DJCHLOROPROPENE
METHYL !SllBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROBENZENE
1 .1.1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
(M-ANO/OR P-)XYLENE
0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM
BROMOBENZENE 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1 .2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
0-CHLOROTOLUENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of. PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 04/27/91
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57271 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-003-GW
PROG ELEM: SSf COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1120 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• • • ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •.• ...... .
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
BOJN TRIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS)
•••FOOTNOTES*•• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERfERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATJON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
------

-
-
METALS DATA REPORT
-

-
---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA~REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
------
05/03/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . •-.... • • • ••• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57271 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
•• STATION ID: NH-003-GW ••
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1120 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/L· ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U 30U NA 370 5.0U 5.0U 10U 60 17 10U 69 40U 30U 40U 25U 640 sou 300 100U 63 13 62 NA 0.3U
36000
490
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
38 12 40 260 9.0
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM
IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS K~ TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 05/07/91
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-i;17 SAMPLE NO. 57271 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-003-GW ••
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1120 STOP: 00/00/00 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •·• .................... .
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUIIPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
---- --------------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS. GA. EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57273 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-004-GW CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1210 STOP: 00/00/00
04/27 /91
• • • ••• •• •• • • ••
••• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SOU (3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL SOU 1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE SOU 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER SOU 2.3.4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL SOU 2,4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL SOU 2,4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL SOU ·2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 54 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 100U 2.4-DINITROPHENOL SOU 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE SOU 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE SOU . 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE SOU 2-CHLOROPHENOL 100U 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL 16J 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 5.1J 2-METHYLPHENOL SOU 2-NITROANILINE SOU 2-NITROPHENOL SOU 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE SOU 3-NITROANILINE SOU 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER sou_ ~4,-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL SOU 4-CHLOROANILINE SOU 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER SOU 4-NITROANILINE 100U 4-NITROPHENOL SOU ACENAPHTHENE SOU ACENAPHTHYLENE SOU ANTflRACENE SOU BENZO(AJANTHRACENE SOU BENZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou . sou sou sou sou 19J sou 100U sou sou sou
BENZO(GHJ)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER B!S(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETIIYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE JNDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PYRENE JSOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PIIEtJOL PYRENE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57273 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-004-GW
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
04/27/91
•• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1210 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • ••• •• •• ••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
20JN 1000JN 600JN 100JN 200JN 900J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
ETHYLDIIIETHYLBENZENE(2 ISOMERS) TRIMETHYLHEXANOIC ACID TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENEDIOXIDE 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE NAPHTHALIC ANHYDRIED 5 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N~PRESUIIPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND IIAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- ----

-
-
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
-----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
-----

-
05/20/91
............... ~ .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
•• STATION ID: NH-004-GW ••
NO. 57273 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
04/17/91 1210 STOP: 00/00/00 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ........................... .
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.61U 0.61U 0.61U 0.20U 0.61U 0.20U 0.61U 0.61U 0.61U 0. 75U 0. 75U 0.75U 0. 75U 0.75U 0. 75U 3.8U 11 U 11 U 11 U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC CLINDANEJ
DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT CP.P'-DDTJ
4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDEJ 4.4'-DDD (P.P'-DDDJ
ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 CAROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
11U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
11U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
11U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
11U PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
30U TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2
BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCHLORDANE COCTACHLOREPOXIDEJ /2
1.5U METHOXYCHLOR
1. 5U ENDRIN KETONE ·
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91--617 "SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH--004-GW ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 04/27/91
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• 57273 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1210 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RE SUL TS
sou sou sou sou sou sou soou 120U sou sou sou 120U sou sou soou sou sou sou sou sou sou 110 sou sou sou sou
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROYJMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(I .1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE· CHLOROFORM 1,1 ,I-TRICHLOROETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
sou 120U 5.8J sou sou sou sou 120U sou sou sou 43J 6.4J 13J sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou
CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1.1.2-TRJCHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 ,1.1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE CM-AND/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1 ,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE I .2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0--CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DJCHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -
- --

-
---
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT
-----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
------
D4/27/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57273 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: NH-004-GW COLLECTION START: D4/17/91 1210 STOP: 00/00/00
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
200JN METHOXYMETHYLPROPANE
60JN TRIMETHYLBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 05/03/91
••• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57273 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-004-GW
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1210 STOP: 00/00/00 • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U 30U NA
290 5.0U 5.0U IOU
58 12 IOU 69 40U 30U 40U 25U 160 sou 220 100U 67 17 40 NA 0.3U 46000 130
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
28 7.0
22 250 11
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-- -- - - - --- --- -- ---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57273 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-004-GW
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1210 STOP: 00/00/00
05/07/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57274 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-OOS-GW ••
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1315 STOP: 00/00/00
04/27/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 2OU IOU IOU IOU IOU 2OU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU lOU 2OU IOU IOU IOU lOU IOU
!3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3.4.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPllENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-N ITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-N ITROAN I LI NE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTHRACENE HENZO(AJANTHRACENE BENZO!B AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
lOU lOU lOU lOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU lOU lOU IOU lOU IOU lOU . IOU IOU IOU lOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU lOU 1OU 2OU lOU
IOU lOU
BENZO!GHIJPERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS!2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER B15(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO!A.HJANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PIITllALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCPJ HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1 .2.3-CDJ PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PYRENE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUIIPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- ---------

-
-SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
------
D4/27/91
••• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••• • • • • ••• •• •• •• PROJECT NO. 91--617 SAMPLE
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-005-GW
NO. 57274 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC .
04/17/91 1315 STOP: 00/00/00
•• • •
••• • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
SJN CCBUTOXYETHOXYJETHOXYJETHANOL
5JN CCBUTOXYETHOXYJETHOXY)ETHANOL
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE DF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANT!TATION LIMIT.
•R--OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 . SAMPLE NO. 57274 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-005-GW ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1315 STOP: 00/00/00
05/20/91
•••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.10U 0.10U 0.25U 0.068U 0.20U 0.068U 0.15U 0.15U 0.15U 0.25U 0.15U 0.20U o.2ou 0.20U 0.25U 0.94U 2.9U 2.9U 2.9U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT) 4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE) 4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD) ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
2.9U 2.9U 2.9U 2.9U lOU
0.50U 0.25U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE /2 ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXVCflLORDANE ( OCTACIILOREPOX IDE) /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY·GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-----

-
-------------
- - -- - ----- ---
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
- --- - -
04/25/91
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••• •• •• •• .. •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-005-GW
NO. 57274 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1315 STOP: 00/00/00
•• ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ............................. .
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou s.ou sou 1.BJ s.ou 5.0U s.ou 12U s.ou 5.0U· sou s.ou 2.9J 5.0U s.ou s.ou 5.0U 1.0U s.ou 5.0U s.ou s.ou
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1. 1-DICHLOROETHENE(1 ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ
ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2. 2··DICIILOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 ,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
5.0U 12U 0.89J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U s.ou s.ou 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1,1 ,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0 XYLENE STYRENE
BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1 ,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 ,2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 05/03/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57274 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-005-GW CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1315 STOP.: 00/00/00 •• •• ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·• ............................... .
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
• •
10U 30U NA 92 5.0U 5.0U 10U 65 14 10U
33 40U
30U 40U 25U
56 sou 190 100U 60 10U 40 NA 0.3U
58000 61
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
6.3 2.8 11 9.7 3.5
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT.
-- - - - -
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
--- - - -
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
--- - - -
05/07/91
••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57274 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• ••
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-005-GW
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1315 STOP: 00/00/00 • • ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ................... .
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-006-GW ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 57275 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1510 STOP: 00/00/00
04/30/91
••••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L . ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
20U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 20U 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 20U 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 20U 2.3.4.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 20U 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 20U 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 20U 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 20U 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 40U 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 20U 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 20U 2.6-0INITROTOLUENE 20U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 20U 2-CHLOROPHENOL 40U 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL 20U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 20U 2-METHYLPHENOL 20U 2-NITROANILINE 20U 2-NITROPHENOL 20U 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIOINE 20U 3-NITROANILINE 20U 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 20U 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 20U 4-CHLOROANILINE 20U 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 20U 4-NITROANILINE 40U 4-NITROPHENOL 20U ACENAPHTHENE 20U ACENAPHTHYLENE WU ANTIIRACENE 20U BENZO(AJANTHRACENE 20U BENZO(B ANO/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
20U BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE 20U BENZO-A-PYRENE 20U BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 20U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXVJ METHANE 20U BIS(2-CHLOROETHVL) ETHER 20U BIS(2-ETHVLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE 20U CARBAZOLE 20U CHRVSENE 20U 01-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE 20U DI-N-OCTVLPHTHALATE 20U OIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE 20U DIBENZOFURAN 20U DIETHYL PHTHALATE 20U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE 20U FLUORANTHENE 20U FLUORENE 20U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) 20U HEXACHLOROBUTAOIENE 20U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 20U HEXACHLOROETHANE 20U INDENO (1 .2.3-CDJ PYRENE 20U ISOPHORONE 20U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE 20U N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/OIPHENYLAMINE 20U NAPHTHALENE 20U NITROBENZENE 40U PENTACHLOROPHENOL 20U PHENANTHRENE 20U rl:ENOL 20U ·pvRENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-- -- - - ---- ---- - - --
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT ... . . . . . . . . . . . -... •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-006-GW ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. ~ ...... . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57275 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1510 STOP: 00/00/00
05/17/91
• •••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0. IOU 0. IOU 0.10U 0. IOU 0. IOU 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.2SU 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.2SU 0.2SU
1. 2U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC !LINDANE) DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE) 4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDDJ ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
2.0U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0U lOU
o.sou 0.25U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCllLORDANE ( OCT ACI ILOREPOX IDE J /2 METHOXVCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
•••REMARKS••• •••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT. C-CONFJRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ............... • .....
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-006-GW ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 57275 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1510 STOP: 00/00/00
04/27/91
• •••••• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
••
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U sou 5.0U
1. 2J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U I.OU 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-0ICHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICIILOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1,1 ,1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
--- - - -- --- -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
METALS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91--617 SAMPLE NO. 57275 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
--- -
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
- -
05/03/91
• • • • •• •• •• ••
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-006-GW
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1510 STOP: 00/00/00
••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG./L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU 30U
NA
50 5.0U 5.0U IOU 71 IOU IOU 110 40U 30U 40U 25U 59 50U
85 100U 20 IOU 40
NA 0.3U
16000 59
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD
ANTIMONY SELENIUM
TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM
VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
8.6 2.6
6. 1 6. 1 2.0U
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT .............. ~ .................... .
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57275 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-006-GW ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1510 STOP: 00/00/00
05/07/91
••••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- -- --·--
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
- - - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
- - - --
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO . 57221 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-SL BACKGROUND SURFACE •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3300U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3300U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3300U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U
(3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL 1 .2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLORO!SOPROPYLETHER 2.3.4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINJTROPHENOL '2.4-DJNITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4.6-DJNITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NJTROANILJNE 2-N ITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZJDJNE 3-NITROANJLINE .4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-N IT ROAN I LI NE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE · ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTHRACENE BENZO(AJANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
• •
SOIL
• • • • • • • • • • •
CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1420 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • UG/KG
1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U
1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U ,1600U 1600U 1600U 3300U 1600U 1600U 1600IJ 21.0
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE 01-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE 01-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A.HJANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADJENE (HCCPJ HEXACHLOROETHANE JNDENO (1 ,2.3-CDJ PYRENE JSOPHORONE
• •
N-NITROSODJ-N-PROPYLAMJNE N-NJTROSODJPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMJNE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PVRENE PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • •
-
04/23/91
• • • •• •• •• • • • • • • .. .
•••FOOTNOTES••• . , •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •MAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
04/23/91
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57221 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ••• •• •• ••
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION IO: NH-001-SL BACKGROUND SURFACE SOIL ••
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1420 STOP: 00/00/00 • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
7000J
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
•
--------

-
----

-
--
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57221 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: NH-001-SL BACKGROUND SURFACE SOIL COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1420 STOP: 00/00/00
••
--
05/07/91
••••••• •• •• •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 40U 40U 40U 40U 40U 40U 100U 200U 200U 200U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANEJ
DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN 4,4'-DDT (P.P'-DDTJ
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDEJ
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDDJ
ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
200U 200U 200U 200U 1500U
BOU 40U 21
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXJDEJ /2
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRJN KETONE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT. C-CONFJRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE JS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
-- -- - ------ - ---- -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. ... . . . . . . . . . . •.• ................. . •••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57221 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-SL BACKGROUND SURFACE SOIL ••
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/10/91 1420 STOP: 00/00/00
04/30/91
• • • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
79U CHLOROMETHANE 79U VINYL CHLORIDE 79U BROMOMETHANE 79U CHLOROETHANE 79U TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 79U 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ 790U ACETONE 790U CARBON DISULFIDE 160U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 79U TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 79U 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 790U VINYL ACETATE 79U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 79U 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 790U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 79U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 79U CHLOROFORM 79U 1 ,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 79U 1 ,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 79U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 79U 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE 79U --BENZENE 79U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 79U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 79U DIBROMOMETHANE 79U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
79U 790U 79U 79U 79U 79U 79U 790U 79U 79U 79U 79U !OJ 79U 79U 79U 79U 79U 79U 79U 79U 79U 79U 79U 21. 0
CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1,1,1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(r.t--AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
-
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
••• •• •• •• ••
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57221 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-001-SL BACKGROUND SURFACE SOIL
••• • • • MG/KG 1.0U 3.0U NA
6.7 o.sou o.sou 1.0U 1. 4 1.0U 1.0U 2.0U 6.0 3.0U 4.0U 2.SU 3.4 5.0U 130 10U
2. 1 1.0U 2.4 NA 0.065 590 4.5
•••••••
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • •
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: 04/10/91. 1420 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • MG/KG 630 64 400 100U 200U 21
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
POTASSIUM PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • •
05/01/91
• • • • ••• •• •• • • •• • • • • •••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- -- - - - - - - - - -------
- - -- - - -
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
--- --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
--- - -
••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57221 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-SL BACKGROUND SURFACE SOIL ••
TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1420 STOP: 00/00/00
-
05/07/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 0.25U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 04/23/91
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57218 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-002-SL BACKGROUND SUBSURFACE SOIL ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 14"0 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3200U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3200U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3200U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-NITROPHENOL 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTHRACENE BENZO(AJANTHRACENE BENZO(B ANO/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U
1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3200U 1600U 1600U 1600U 20.0
BENZOCGHllPERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE 01-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE 01-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1.2,3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PYRENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUr.ASER IS Tl-lE :,UNit.fUU QUAtJTITATIOt-J LIMIT.
- -- -- ---- ---------· -
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. ... . . . . . . . . . . •.• .................... . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57218 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-002-SL BACKGROUND SUBSURFACE SOIL ••
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/10/91 1440 STOP: 00/00/00
05/07/91
• • • • • •• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 40U 40U 40U 40U 40U 40U lOOU 200U 200U 200U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDEl 4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDDl ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
200U 200U 200U 200U lSOOU
BOU 40U 20
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE /2 ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE) /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMfD BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 04/23/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57218 SAMPLE TYPE: •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
• • • • • • SOIL • ••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• STATION ID: NH-002-SL BACKGROUND SUBSURFACE SOIL •• ••• • • • ••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
52U CHLOROMETHANE 52U VINYL CHLORIDE 52U BROMOMETHANE 52U CHLOROETHANE 52U TR!CHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 52U 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 520U ACETONE 520U CARBON DISULFIDE 52U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 52U TRANS-1.2-DJCHLOROETHENE 52U 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHANE 520U VINYL ACETATE 52U CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 52U 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 520U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 52U BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 52U CHLOROFORM 52U t.t,t-TRJCHLOROETHANE 52U 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 52U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 52U t,2-DICHLOROETHANE 52U BENZENE 52U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 52U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 52U DIBROMOMETHANE 52U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • • UG/KG
52U 520U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 520U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 52U 20.0
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/10/91 1440 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE t ,t,1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(It-ANDtOR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLEN STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1, t ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE t,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 ,3-DJCHLOROBENZENE 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE t .2-DICHLOROBENZENE PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • • •••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERiAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIUUU QUANTITATION LIMIT.
------- --------- --·-
METALS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 . SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-002-SL BACKGROUND ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••• 57218 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SUBSURFACE SOIL
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/10/91 1440 STOP: 00/00/00 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • IIG/KG I.OU 3.0U NA 2.7 0.50U 0.50U I.OU
1. 7 I.OU I.OU 2.0U 4.0U 3.0U 4.0U 2.5U
1. OU 5.0U 65 10U 1. 7 I.OU I.OU NA o.osu
1600 2.2
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG sou 37 860
100U
200U 20
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SODIUM POTASSIUM PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
05/01/91
••••••• •• •• •• • • • • • • •••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 05/07/91
••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57218 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC STATION ID: NH-002-SL BACKGROUND SUBSURFACE SOIL COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1440 STOP: 00/00/00 • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 0.25U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANT!TATION LIMIT.
------------------I
- -- -- - -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
-- - --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
- - - - -
••• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57220 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-003-SL SURFACE SOIL NEAR REMOVAL AREA
PROO ELEM: SSf CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ST: NC 04/10/91 1530 STOP: 00/00/00
-
04/23/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U
3000U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U
3000U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 3000U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1 .2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3,4.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-N ITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-N IT ROAN I LI NE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-N IT ROAN I LI NE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTHRACENE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR K)fLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U
1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1500U 1SOOU 1SOOU 1500U 1SOOU 1500U 3000U 1SOOU 1500U 1SOOU 13.0
BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOfURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE fLUORANTHENE fLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCPJ HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1.2.3-CDJ PYRENE ISOPHORONE _ N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE rHENOL PYRENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAY-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE .COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
04/23/91
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57220 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-003-SL SURFACE SOIL NEAR REMOVAL AREA ••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1530 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
N PETROLEUM PRODUCT
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATIDN LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-----------------
•
-
- -- - -- -- --- - - - ----
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMl'NT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. ............... • ................. . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57220 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-003-SL SURFACE SOIL NEAR REMOVAL AREA ••
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ST: NC 04/10/91 1530 STOP: 00/00/00
05/07/91
• •••••• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 40U 40U 40U 40U 40U 40U 100U 200U 200U 200U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE) 4.4'-DDD <P.P'-DDDJ ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDDSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
200U 200U 200U 200U 1500U
sou 40U 13
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE /2 ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE) /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••RE~RKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES Of TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. ••• •• •• •• ••
............ • ................. . • • • • ••••••• • ••••••••••••••••• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57220 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-003-SL SURFACE SOIL NEAR REMOVAL AREA
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/10/91. 1530 STOP: 00/00/00
04/30/91
• • • ••• •• •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RE SUL TS
72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 720U 720U 140U 72U 72U 720U 72U 72U 720U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1 ,1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
72U 720U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 720U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 72U 13.0
CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL !SOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1. 1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1. 1 .1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1. 1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •MAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS K~ TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
------------------
- -- -- - -
METALS DATA REPORT
- -- - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
- --- ----
05/01/91
••• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57220 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••• • • • ••• •• •• •• • •
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-003-SL SURFACE SOIL NEAR REMOVAL AREA
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• MG/KG ANALYTICAL RE SUL TS 1.0U SILVER 1. 2 ARSENIC NA BORON 37 BARIUM 0.SOU BERYLLIUM 0. SOU CADMIUM 1.0U COBALT 3. 6 CHROMIUM 10 COPPER 1 . OU MOLYBDENUM 2.0U NICKEL 130 LEAD 3. OU ANTIMONY 4.0U SELENIUM 4. 5 TIN 8.4 STRONTIUM 5. OU TELLURIUM 66 TITANIUM 10U THALLIUM 4.7 VANADIUM 1 . OU YTTRIUM 66 ZINC NA Z I RCON !UM 0. 10 MERCURY 2200 ALUMINUM 22 MANGANESE
COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ST: NC PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1530 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • • • • • • MG/KG 1700 120 3300 100U 200U 13
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SODIUM POTASSIUM PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • • • • • • • ••
•••REMARKS••• •••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-tlATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 05/D7/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57220 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ••
•• STATION ID: NH-003-SL SURFACE SOIL NEAR REMOVAL AREA CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1530 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 0.23U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERfERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUII QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- ---- -- -----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
------
04/30/91
••• EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-617 . SAMPLE NO. 57276 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• •• •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-013-SL •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL. RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1625 STOP: 00/00/00
1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2900U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2900U 230J 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2900U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1 .2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRJCHLOROPHENOL 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-N IT ROAN I LI NE 2-NJTROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE AIJTIIRACENE BENZO{A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2900U 1400U 1400U 1400U 12.0
BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS{2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE BJS{2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER BJS(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DJ-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DJ-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A.HJANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PYRENE JSOPHORONE N-NJTROSODJ-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PIIENOL PYRENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA,
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE-COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
04/30/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57276 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION JD: NH-013-SL ••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1625 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
3000JN SOOJN 1000JN 4000JN BOOJN BOOJN
N
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENEC4 ISOMERS) 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE DJMETHYLNAPHTHALENE TRIMETHYLNAPHTHALENEC4 ISOMERS) METHYLPHENANTHRENEC2 ISOMERS) ·DJMETHYLPHENANTHRENE PETROLEUM PRODUCT
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R--QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
------------------
---- - -- - - -- -- - - - --
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT ............. •.• ...
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-013-SL ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57276 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1625 STOP: 00/00/00
05/20/91
••••••• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
••
15U 15U 15U
7. lU 15U
7.1U 15U 15U !SU 36U 15U 28U 28U
28U 36U 89U 360U 360U 360U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT) 4.4"-DDE (P.P'-DDE) 4,4"-DDD (P,P'-DDD) ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
\
360U 360U 360U 360U 1500U
71U 36U 12
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE b2 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCIILORDANE (OCTACIILOREPOXIDE J /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL. CHLORDANE.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... . . . . . . . . . . . . • ... •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION JD: NH-013-SL ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57276 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1625 STOP: 00/00/00
05/08/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• UG/KG
280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 2800U 2800U 280U 280U 280U 2800U 280U 280U 2800U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1. 1-DJCHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1. 1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1. 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DJBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
UG/KG
280U 2800U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 2800U 280U 280U 280U 31J 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U 280U ·12.0
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CJS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1.3-DJCHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1.1 .1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1.1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1.3-DJCHLOROBENZENE 1.4-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM 0UANTITATION LIMIT.
------------------
----- --
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE OR,GANICS -DATA REPORT
-- ---
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
-- ----
05/08/91
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57276 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• STATION ID: NH-013-SL COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1625 STOP: 00/00/00 •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
4000JN
N
4000JN N
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
TRIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS) PETROLEUM PRODUCT TRIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS) PETROLEUM PRODUCT
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
METALS DATA REPORT
05/03/91
••• •• •• •• •• •••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57276 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
STATION ID: NH-013-SL
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
04/17/91 1625 STOP: 00/00/00
• ••••• •• •• • • ••
• • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
MG6KG 1. u SILVER ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
320 CALCIUM
3.0U ARSENIC 130 MAGNESIUM
NA BORON 630 IRON
5.0 BARIUM 100U SODIUM
a.sou BERYLLIUM 200U POTASSIUM
a.sou CADMIUM 12 PERCENT MOISTURE
I.OU COBALT
2.9 CHROMIUM
I.OU COPPER I.OU MOLYBDENUM
2.0U NICKEL 4.3 LEAD 3.0U ANTIMONY
4.0U SELENIUM 2.5U TIN 2.5 STRONTIUM
5.0U TELLURIUM
150 TITANIUM
IOU THALLIUM 4.0 VANADIUM I.OU YTTRIUM 1. 7 ZINC
NA ZIRCONIUM o.osu MERCURY
2500 ALUMINUM 6.4 MANGANESE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
-----

-
------------
..
-
- -- ----- - - - -- - - - --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91---617 SAMPLE NO. 57276 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION JD: NH-013-SL
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1625 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
05/07/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 0.23U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ............... • ... •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-018-SL ••
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57277 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91. 1640 STOP: 00/00/00
04/30/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
-
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3200U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3200U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3200U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3.4.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL 2--METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-NITROPHENOL 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0--3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTI IRACENE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 1600U 3200U 1600U 1600U 1600U 17. 0
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE BENZO--A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE B!5(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER Bl5(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCPJ HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE r11rnoL PYRENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM 0UANTITATION LIMIT.
------------------
- -- -- - - - - - -- - - ----
PESTICIOES/PCB'S DATA REPORT .............. ' ...
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-018-SL ••
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57277 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1640 STOP: 00/00/00
05/20/91
• ••••• •• •• .. .. ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
16U 16U 16U
7.SU 16U 7.BU 16U 16U 16U 40U 16U
31U 31U 31U 40U
98U 400U 400U 400U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIOE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINOANEJ DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT) 4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE) 4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD) ENORJN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
400U 400U 400U 400U 1600U
7BU 40U 17
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CJS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCIILORDANE (OCTACIJLOREPOXIDE J /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRJN KETONE PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
PURGEABLE "ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... . . . . . . . . . . . -... •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-018-SL ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• NO. 57277 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1640 STOP: 00/00/00
05/08/91
• •••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RE SUL TS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 670U 670U 67U 67U 67U 670U 67U 67U 670U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-I .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICflLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE _ TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
67U 670U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 670U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 67U 17. 0
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1.1.1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XVLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1 .1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 .2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS K~ TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS K~ TO BE GREATER THAN.VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-----

-
-------------
--------- ------- --· -
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 05/03/91 ••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 'SAMPLE NO. 57277 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-018-SL •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 1.0U SILVER 3.0U ARSENIC NA BORON 2. 2 BARIUM 0. SOU BERYLLIUM O.SOU CADMIUM LOU COBALT 1. 9 CHROMIUM 1 .OU COPPER 1 . OU MOLYBDENUM 2.0U NICKEL 2 .8 LEAD 3 . OU ANTI IIONY 4.0U SELENIUM 2.SU TIN 1. OU STRONTIUM 5.0U TELLURIUM 150 TITANIUM 10U THALLIUM 1.8 VANADIUM LOU YTTRIUM 1.3 ZINC NA ZIRCONIUM o.osu· MERCURY 500 ALUMINUM 5. 1 MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
• • • • • • • • • • • •
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1640 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • MG/KG
84 24 230 100U 200U 17
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SODIUM POTASSIUM PERCENT MOISTURE
••.•REMARKS•••
• • • • • • • • • • •••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA RE~RT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 05/07/91
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-ti17 SAMPLE NO. 57277 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-01B-SL CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1640 STOP: 00/00/00
••• •• •• ••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 0.24U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- -- ------- - -- --- --
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 'SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-CN
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57212 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
05/07/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1610 STOP: 00/00/00
0.025U 0.025U 0.025U 0.025U 0.025U 0.025U 0.025U 0.025U 0.025U 0.055U o.ossu 0.055U 0.055U o.ossu o.ossu 0.15U 0.27U 0.27U 0.27U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT CP.P'-DDT) 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE) 4,4'-000 (P.P'-DDD) ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE {TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 CAROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 {AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
0.27U 0.27U 0.27U 0.27U 2.2U
0. 11U 0.055U 86
PCB-1232 CAROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 CAROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 CAROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 {AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAIIMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDEJ /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUIIPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRIIED BY GC/115 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 04/22/91 •••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-CN ••
NO. 57212 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 · 1610 STOP: 00/00/00 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 12U 1 ,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 12U 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 12U 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 12U 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 12U 2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 12U 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 12U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 25U 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 12U 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 12U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 12U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 12U 2-CHLOROPHENOL 25U 2-·METHYL-4. 6--DINITROPHENOL 12U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 12U 2-METHYLPHENOL 12U 2-NITROANILINE 12U 2-NITROPHENOL 12U 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 12U 3-NITROANILINE 12U 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 12U 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 12U 4-CHLOROANILINE 12U 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 12U 4-NITROANILINE 25U 4-NITROPHENOL 12U ACENAPHTHENE 12U ACENAPHTHYLENE 12U ANTHRACENE 12U BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 12U BENZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 25U 12U 12U 12U
56.0
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 81Sl2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETIIYL PflTl1ALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PYRENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
--------------------
- --- - -- - ---- ---- --
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
••• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . ' .................. . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57212 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-001-CN
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/10/91 1610 STOP: 00/00/00
04/27/91
• • • • •• •• •• • • •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• MG/KG
8.2U
8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 82U 21U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 21U 8.2U 8.2U 82U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUO-ETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENEC1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
MG/KG
8.2U 21U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 21U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U 8.2U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1.1.1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE .CM-AND/OR P-J XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLORDTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS••• •••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 05/01/91 •••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 "SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 57212 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN • • • ••• •• •• •• ••
•• STATION ID: NH-001-CN •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG 6.6 SILVER 5.4 ARSENIC NA BORON 30 BARIUM 0.SOU BERYLLIUM 0.SOU CADMIUM 1.0U COBALT 3.1 CHROMIUM 12 COPPER 1 . OU MOLYBDENUM 2.0U NICKEL 53 LEAD 3.0U ANTIMONY 4.0U SELENIUM 5.2 TIN 12 STRONTIUM 5.0U TELLURIUM 40 TITANIUM 10U THALLIUM 8.5 VANADIUM 2.4 YTTRIUM 68 ZINC NA ZIRCONIUM 1. 5 MERCURY 5700 ALUMINUM 33 MANGANESE
• • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1610 STOP: 00/00/00 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG 2600 130 9600
lOOU 200U 56
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SODIUM POTASSIUM PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
• • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-- --

-

-
-

-

-
-----

-
--

-

-
- -- -- ------ -- - -- ----
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA RERORT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57212 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION IO: NH-001-CN
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/10/91 1610 STOP: 00/00/00
05/07/91
• • • ••• .. •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••REMARKS•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 2.3UJ MG/KG CYANIDE
ELEMENTS REPORTED AS EST(J) ARE DUE TO LOW MATRIX RECOVERY
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-002-CN ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 57265 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91. 1400 STOP: 00/00/00
04/30/91
••••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 200U 100U 100U 100U 100U 200U 100U 2OJ 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 200U 100U 100U 1OOU 100U 100U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1 ,2,4-TR!CHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METIIYL-4 .6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-N ITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-N IT ROAN I LI NE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTllnACENE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 100U 1OOU 100U 1OOU 100U lOOU lOOU lOOU lOOU lOOU lOOU lOOU lOOU lOOU lOOU 100U 100U lOOU 200U lOOU 36J lOOU
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE D1-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A.HJANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE !NDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE N!TROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE rllENOL PYRENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS K~ TO Bf LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS K~ TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
----

-
-------------
- -- -- -- - --- - ---- -
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-002-CN ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57265 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17 /91 1400 STOP: 00/00/00
-
05/17/91
•••••• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.0010U 0.0010U 0.0010U o.oo,ou 0.0010U 0.0010U 0.0010U 0.0010U 0.0010U 0.0025U 0.0025U 0.0025U 0.0025U 0.0025U 0.0025U 0.012U 0.020U 0.020U 0.020U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4,4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT) 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDEJ 4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDDJ ENDRIN END05ULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 CAROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
0.020U 0.020U 0.020U 0.020U 0.20U
0.0050U 0.0025U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 CAROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 CAROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXVCIILORDANE COCTACIILOREPOXIDE l /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N--PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES Of TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT .............. ~ ..... •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION IO: NW-002-CN ••
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••• •••••••••••••••••• 57265 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/17/91 1400 STOP: 00/00/00
04/27/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS soou soou soou soou soou soou 14000J 1200U soou soou soou 1200U soou soou
5000U soou soou soou soou soou soou soou soou soou soou soou
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE 8ROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-I .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1. 1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1. 1 .I-TRICHLOROETHANE 1, 1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
soou 1200U soou soou soou soou soou 1200U soou soou soou soou soou 73J soou soou soou 500U soou soou 500U soou soou soou
CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1,1 .1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 .2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAY-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
----

-
-------------
-- - -- - -
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT
- - -- -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
-- - - ----
04/27/91
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91--617 SAMPLE NO. 57265 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-002-CN ••
PROG ELEM: SSf COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1400 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
2000JN ISOPROPANOL
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERfERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED fOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY fOR VERlflCATION.
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 05/03/91 ••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57265 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NW-002-CN
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/17 /91 1400 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
20U 25U NA 280 10U 10U 20U 190
77 20U 47 110 60U sou sou 1200 100U 480 200U 180 51 1200 NA 0.3U
140000
560
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
38 CALCIUM 16 MAGNESIUM 57 IRON 60 SODIUM 10 POTASSIUM
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS K-N TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS K~ TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-----

-
-------------
-- --------- - -- - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91--617 SAMPLE NO. 57265 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-002-CN
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1400 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
05/07/91
• • • • •• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER IOU UG/L CYANIDE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 05/09/91 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57278 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION JD: NH-001-WA
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOADN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1535 STOP: 00/00/00 •• REMARKS: RESULTS OF TCLP EXTRACT OF THIS SAMPLE ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
(3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3.4.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4,S-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINJTROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METflYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-N JTROAN I LI NE 2-N JTROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NJTROANJLINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROAN I LI NE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NJTROANILINE 4-NJTROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTHRACENE BENZOCAJANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS••• CANNOT FAIL TCLP TEST BASED ON SCAN ANALYSES
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA
NA.
NA NA NA NA NA NA
BENZOCGHJ)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BJSC2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE BISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DJ-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DJ-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZOCA.H)ANTHRACENE DJBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PIITIIALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE CHCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE CHCCPJ HEXACHLOROETHANE JNDENO Cl .2.3-CD) PYRENE JSOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PYRENE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------------------
-- - -- --- - -- - -- - - --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 05/09/91
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57278 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-WA
•• REMARKS: RESULTS OF TCLP EXTRACT OF THIS SAMPLE
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOADN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1535 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••REMARKS•••
16000U 16000U 70000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L
CYCLOHEXANONE PYRIDINE 1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND
CANNOT FAIL TCLP TEST BASED ON SCAN ANALYSES
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57278 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
• • • •••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• STATION ID: NH-001-WA •• REMARKS: RESULTS OF TCLP EXTRACT OF THIS SAMPLE
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOADN ST: NC 04/17/91 1535 STOP: 00/00/00
05/06/91
• •••••• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
••
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS••• CANNOT FAIL TCLP TEST BASED ON SCAN ANALYSES
•••FOOTNOTES•••
NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1 .1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 ,1.1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE O·XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 ,3-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF. PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
- - - -- - -- - -- ------
METALS DATA REPORT ... . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ....... .
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57264 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-001-WA •• ••••••••••••• MG/KG 1. OU SILVER 3.0U ARSENIC NA BORON 8.0 BARIUM O.SOU BERYLLIUM 0 . SOU CAOM !UM 1 .OU COBALT 3. 9 CHROMIUM 2.6 COPPER 1 . OU MOL YBOENUM 2.0U NICKEL 4. 1 LEAD 3. OU ANTIMONY 4.0U SELENIUM 2.SU TIN 7.2 STRONTIUM 5.0U TELLURIUM 86 TITANIUM 10U THALLIUM 5.1 VANADIUM 1.4 YTTRIUM 9.2 ZINC NA-ZIRCONIUM 0.05U MERCURY 2200 ALUMINUM 20 MANGANESE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 05/03/91
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ••
• • • • • • • • • • • •
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 1535 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
• • • • MG/KG 530 180
2000 140 200U 24
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SODIUM POTASSIUM PERCENT MOISTURE
•• • • • • • • • • • • • ••
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT.
-
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-ESD.REG IV ATHENS GEORGIA
05/03/91 TCLP DATA REPORTING SHEET WASTE
SAMPLE NO.: 91C57264 SAMPLE TYPE: WASTE
PROJECT NO.: 91-617 PROGRAM ELEMENT: SSF SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON STATE: NC
STATION 1.D.: NW-001-WA STORET STATION NO:
SAMPLE COLLECTION: START DATE/TIME 04/17/91 1535 SAMPLE COLLECTION: STOP DATE/TIME 00/00/00
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN RECEIVED FROM: F SLOAN SAMPLE REC'D: DATE/TIME 04/19/91 0810 REC'D BY: D COLQUITT SEALED: YES CIIEMIST: MAW
REMARK: REMARK:
SAMPLE LOG VERIFIED BY: VAX SAMPLE DATA VERIFIED BY: MAW
•••REMARKS••• NO EP/TCLP FAIL POSSIBILITY-SEE TOTAL METAL DATA .
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- - -- - -- --
•••••ANALYTICAL RESULTS•••••
RESULTS UNITS NA MG/L NA MG/L NA MG/L NA MG/L NA MG/L NA MG/L NA MG/L NA MG/L
- -
PARAMETER SILVER ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHROMIUM LEAD SELENIUM MERCURY
-- - - -- -
-

-
-

-
--------

-
-

-
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53769 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-25
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1450 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: Z135 MD NO: Z135
••
-

-
01/31/91
• • • ••• .. •• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
IOU MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
•
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
METALS DATA REPORT
02/01 /91
••• •• •• •• •• •• •••
NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA
• • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• •• •• •• • • ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53769 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION JD: BP-25 CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
• • • UG/L •••••
ALUMINUM ANTIK>NY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM
CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM
• • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • • • • •
MD NUMBER: 2135 12/12/90 1450 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • UG/L NA
1 .60J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• ••••• • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERfERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
------------

-
------
----- ----------- --SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -OATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53769 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY STATION IO: BP-25 CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTEO BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1450 STOP: 00/00/00 0. NO.: 2135 MO NO: 2135
03/04/91
• •• • •• •• •• •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •••
10JN 100JN 20JN 60JN 40JN 60JN 50J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
PENTANE METHOXYMETHYLPROPANE OXYBISPROPANE TETRAHYDROTHIOPHENE ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS) PROPYLBENZENE 3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
>
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZEO •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS 15 NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEll£NT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91
............... -.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-25
NO. 53769 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1450 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: D. NO.: 2135
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • * • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
l2U CHLOROMETHANE 12U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U BROMOMETHANE l2U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U VINYL CHLORIDE I 2U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
12U CHLOROETHANE 12U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
l2U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 12U 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
l2U ACETONE 210 BENZENE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE l2U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,I-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U BROMOFORM
l2U 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
12U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
l2U CHLOROFORM 12U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
12U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE l2U 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
12U METIIYL ETIIYL KETONE 12U TOLUENE
'12U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 12U CHLOROBENZENE
12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 120 ETHYL BENZENE
12U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 12U STYRENE 2J TOTAL XYLENES
•••REMARKS••• •••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • •
•• •• •••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------------------
----

-
-

-
-----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
------03/04/91
••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53769 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-25
CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1450 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2135 MD NO: Z135
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
N 70JN 300JN 2000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
METHYLNAPHTHALENEACETIC ACID
NAPHTHOPYRANOIONE
17 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N--PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MAlERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOl DElEClED. lHE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• 53769 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION JD: BP-25 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502 ••• • • • UG/L
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U ·10U 12U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 15 10U 10U 50U 10U sou
lOU 10U 10U
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'-CHLOROJSOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE NJTROBENZENE ISOPHORONE 2-NJTROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRJCHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-NJTROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
SAS NO.: • • • • • • • • • • • •
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC H COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1450 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
D. NO.: 2135 • • • UG/L
50U 10U 50U 50U 10U 10U
lOU 10U 10U 50U 50U 10U 10U 10U 50U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U IOU 10U 10U 10U
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NJTROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NJTROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL N-NJTROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMJNE 4-BROIIOPHENYL PHENYL ETIIER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DJ-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BEN20( B AND/OR K) FLUORANTI IENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1,2.3-CDJ PYRENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
•• •• • ••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
------- -----------SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53768 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• STATION ID: BP-24 •• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1405 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: 2134 MD NO: 2134
01/31/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 10U MG/KG CYANIDE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
METALS DATA REPORT SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
02/01/91
•••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 · SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-24
••••••••••••••••• NO. 53768 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN • ••••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• CASE NUMBER: 15502 •• •••
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
• • • UG/L • • • • •
ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHRCNJUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM
• •
SAS NUMBER:
• • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • • • • •
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1405 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NUMBER: 2134
• • • • • UG/L NA 0.5UJ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER
SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • • • • • • • ••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE rs· KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATER!AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPL!NG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- - --

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-----
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
•••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-24 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502
-------SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
---
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
NO. 53768 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: 2134
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
12/12/90 1405 STOP: 00/00/00
--
03/04/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 30U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1 ,1-DJCHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1 .1-D!CHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETIIYL KETONE
1. 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U BJ 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U
10U 1J 10U 2J
1 .2-DJCHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1 ,1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROIIOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1 .2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KIIIOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 03/04/91
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53768 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-24 •• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ••
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ••
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1405 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
D. NO.: Z134 MD NO: Z134 •• •• ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ............. .
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
40J 2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
20JN TRIMETHYLCYCLOPENTENONE
50JN TRIMETHYLHEXANOIC ACID
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------------------
------------SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
------
03/04/91 EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 "SAMPLE NO. 53768 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
' ............................... . PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-24 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU PHENOL IOU BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER IOU 2-CHLOROPHENOL IOU 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE IOU 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE IOU 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE IOU 2-METHYLPHENOL IOU 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER IOU (3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL IOU N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE IOU HEXACHLOROETHANE IOU NITROBENZENE 1 OU I SOPI IORONE 10U 2-NITROPHENOL 2J 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL IOU BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE 10U 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL IOU 1 .2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2J NAPHTHALENE IOU 4-CHLOROANILINE IOU HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE IOU -·4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL-10U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE IOU HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCPJ 10U 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL SOU 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL IOU 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE SOU 2-NITROANILINE IOU DIMETHYL PHTHALATE IOU ACENAPHTHYLENE IOU 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
SAS NO.: • • • • • • • • • • •
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1405 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
D. NO.: Z134 • • • UG/L
50U 10U 50U 50U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U sou sou 10U 10U 10U sou 10U 10U 10U IOU 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U IOU 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-N IT ROAN IL I NE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPflENYL PllENYL ETIIER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE 01-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO( B AND/OR K J FLUORANTHEtJE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1.2,3-CDJ PYRENE DIBENZO(A.HJANTHRACENE BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
• • • •
.. .. ...
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 01/31/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53767 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-23
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1150 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: Z133 MD NO: 2133
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
10U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------------------
-------
METALS DATA REPORT
-----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
---- -
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-184 . SAMPLE NO. 53767 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY STATION ID: BP-23 CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: MD NUMBER: 2133
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/12/90 1150 STOP: 00/00/00
-
02/01/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• • •
••• •• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
UG/L ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L NA 0.5UJ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA, 03/04/91
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGA.,.ICS -DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53767 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-23 •• CASE .NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1150 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: 2133 MD NO: 2133
•• ~--................................................................ .
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
7JN TRJMETHYLBENZENE
•••FOOTNOTES• u, •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- -- - ------ - - - ----
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. .............. ' .....
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 53767 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• STATION ID: BP-23 ••
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1150 STOP: 00/00/00
•• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: 0 . NO.: Z133 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE 10U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10U BROMOMETHANE 10U CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U VINYL CHLORIDE 10U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 10U CHLOROETHANE 10U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 10U 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U ACETONE 10U BENZENE 10U CARBON DISULFIDE 10U TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1 .1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ lOU BROMOFORM 10U 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 10U 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U CHLOROFORM 10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 10U 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 10U METIIYL ETIIYL KETONE lOU TOLUENE 10U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U CHLOROBENZENE 10U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10U ETHYL BENZENE 10U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 10U STYRENE 10U TOTAL XYLENES
03/04/91
••••••• •• •• ••
• • • •
•• •• •••
•••FOOlNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. D3/04/91
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53767 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-23 •• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ••
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ••
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1150 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
D. NO.: 2133 MD NO: 2133 •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
200J 10 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------------------
-- --· -- - ---- -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
---- --
03/04/91
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • * ••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• .. •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53767 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-23 ••
PROG ELEM: SSf CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ST: NC 12/12/90 1150 STOP: 00/00/00 •• ..
•• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: D. NO.: 2133 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1DU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 22 IOU IOU IOU 19 IOU IOU 50U IOU 50U IOU IOU IOU
PHENOL BISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE NITROBENZENE ISOPHORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE ·HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-NITP-OANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
sou IOU sou sou IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU sou sou IOU IOU IOU sou IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 10U IOU lOU lOU IOU IOU IOU IOU lOU lOU lOU ,ou
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 4-N IT ROPHE NOL DIBENZOfURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
fLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPIIENYL PIIENYL ETl1ER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE fLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)fLUORANTIIENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 .2,3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERfERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERlfICATION.
-
-
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53766
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-22 •• CASE .NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: ••
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNOWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1030 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2132 MO NO: 2132
01/31/91
• • • • • •• •• •• •• •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
10U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U--IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
------------------
--

-
-

-
-----

-
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
-

-
-

-
METALS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• •• •• •••
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53766 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-22
CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
• • • UG/L •••••••
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM
BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM
CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD
MAGNESIUM
• • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • • • • •
12/12/90 1030 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NUMBER: 2132
• • • • • UG/L NA 0.20UJ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM
ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • •
•••FOOTNOTES•••
-

-
02/01/91
• • • •
• • • •
••• •• •• •• •• • • • ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. .............. • ..................... . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53766 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-22 ••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 -1030 STOP: 00/00/00
•• CASE NO. : 15502 SAS NO.: D. NO.: 1132 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • UG/L ANALYTICAL RE SUL TS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U IOU IOU 10U IOU 10U IOU 10U IOU IOU 10U 10U 10U IOU 10U IOU
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHVLENE) 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE METflYL ETIIYL KETONE I ,I.I-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
10U 10U 10U IOU IOU IOU IOU 10U IOU IOU 10U 10U 10U IOU IOU IOU IOU
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
•••REMARKS•••
03/04/91
••••••• •• •• •• •• •• • • • • •••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
!al liliiia --- - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
- -- - --
03/04/91
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53766 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-22 ••
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/12/90 1030 STOP: 00/00/00
•• CASE NO.: 15502 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RE SUL TS
SAS NO.: 0. NO.: 2132
IOU IOU IOU 10U IOU 10U 10U 10U IOU 10U IOU IOU IOU 10U IOU 10U IOU IOU 10U 10U IOU -10U -10U 10U 10U 50U IOU sou 10U 10U IOU
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1,3-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAM!NE HEXACHLOROETHANE N!TROBENZENE !SOPHORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2.4-0IMETHVLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXVJ METHANE 2.4-0ICHLOROPHENOL 1 .2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE HEXACHLOROBUTAOIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHVLPHENOL 2-METHVLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTAOIENE (HCCP) 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2 NITROAIJILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2 .6-0INITROTOLUENE·
50U IOU 50U sou IOU IOU 1J IOU IOU 50U 50U 10U 10U 10U 50U 10U IOU 10U 1J 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U IOU IOU IOU 10U IOU 10U
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2.4-DIN!TROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4··BROMOPHENYL PllENYL ElHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE . DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTllENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
•••FOOlNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/31/91
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53765 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-21 •• CASE. NO. : 15502 SAS NO. :
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1330 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: 2131 MD NO: 2131
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 0.59U MG/KG CYANIDE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
= - - - ----- - - ---- - -
--11!!!1
METALS DATA REPORT
lilill liiiii ----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
------
02/01/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • •• •• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53765
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-21 •• CASE NUMBER: 15502 •• ••• • • • MG/KG
1700 3.BUJ 2UJ 5.4 0.24U 0. 71U
1200
2.2 0.47U 4UJ 540J 61 J 70U
• • • • •
ALUMINUM ANTIMONY
ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM
COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• •
SAS NUMBER:
• • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
• • • • • • • • • • •
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1330 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NUMBER: Z131
• • • • • MG/KG
3. 70 0.12U 2.4U 100U 0.47U 0.71U sou 0. 71U NA 2. 1 20U 16
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER
SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • • • • • • • ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-21
NO. 53765 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1330 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• •• SAS NO.: D. NO.: 2131 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U CHLOROMETHANE 12U BROMOMETHANE 12U VINYL CHLORIDE 12U CHLOROETHANE 200U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 20U ACETONE 12U CARBON DISULFIDE 12U 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
12U 1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE 12U 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 12U CHLOROFORM 12U 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE 12U METHYL ETIIVL KETONE 12U 1 ,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 12U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
12U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 12U CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 12U 1 .1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE 12U BENZENE 12U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U BROMOFORM 12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 12U TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 12U 1 ,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 12U TOLUENE 12U CHLOROBENZENE 12U ETHYL BENZENE 12U STYRENE 12U TOTAL XYLENES 14 PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--------

-
---

-
----

-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53765 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ••
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ••
•• STATION ID: BP-21
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 1330 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
D. NO.: 2131 MD NO: 2131 ••
•• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
10000J 11 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
N PETROLEUM PRODUCT
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANT I TAT ION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 03/04/91
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... . . . . . . . . . . . . •· .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• ••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-1B4 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-21
NO. 53765 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• •• CASE NO.: 15502 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
380U PHENOL 380U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 380U 2-CHLOROPHENOL 380U 1 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE 380U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 380U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 380U 2-METHVLPHENOL 380UR 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 380U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 380U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE 380U HEXACHLOROETHANE 380UR NITROBENZENE 380U I SOPI !ORONE 380UJ 2-NITROPHENOL 380UR 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL reg~. ~'.~~~1g~t8~8~~~s~~) METHANE
380UR 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 3B0U NAPHTHALENE 380U 4-CHLOROANILINE 380U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 380U 4-CHLOR0-3-METHVLPHENOL 380U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 380U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 380U 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2000U 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 380UJ 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE :'OOOU 2· NITROANILINE 380U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE 380U ACENAPHTHVLENE 380U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
SAS NO.: • • • • • • • • • • •
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/12/90 1330 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2131 • • • • UG/KG
2000UR 380U 2000U 2000U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 2000U 2000U 380U 380U 380U 2000U 240J 53J 380U 380U 380U 250J 380U 380U 160J 150J 380U 380U 250J 83J 380U 380U 380U 14
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NJTROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4--BROMOP11ENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PVRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZJDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTVLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTIIENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - -
------
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
------
01/31 /91
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53764 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-20
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0915 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2130 MD NO: 2130
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.61U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 02/01/91
••• •• •• •• •• ••
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• •• • • ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53764 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-20 CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
•••••• MG/KG
2400 3.9UJ 0.74UJ 5.6 0.25U 0. 74U
330 2.9 0.49U 12J 620J 7.3J BOU
• • • • •
ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC
BARIUM BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • • • • •
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0915 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NUMBER: 2130
• • • • MG/KG 2.6 0.2U 2.4U 100U 0.49U 0.74U 20U 0.74U NA
3.3 14 18
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY
NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • • • • • • • ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-----

-
-------------
-----

-
----------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53764 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-20 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: 2130
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
12/12/90 0915 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••• • • • • • • •••• • • • • • •
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U CHLOROMETHANE 12U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
12U BROMOMETHANE 12U CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U VINYL CHLORIDE 12U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
12U CHLOROETHANE 12U OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
100U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 12U 1 ,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
40U ACETONE 12U BENZENE
12U CARBON DISULFIDE 12U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
12U 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ 12U BROMOFORM
12U 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
12U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL} 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE
12U CHLOROFORM 12U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ
12U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 12U 1 ,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
12U METHYL Ell IYL KETONE 12U TOLUENE
12U 1 ,1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 12U CHLOROBENZENE
12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 12U ETHYL BENZENE
12U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 12U STYRENE
12U TOTAL XYLENES
19 PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS••• •••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOlES•••
--
03/04/91
••••••• •• •• •• •• •• • • • • • ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTA8LE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53764 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED 8Y: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: 8P-20
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0915 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2130 MD NO: 2130
••
03/04/91
• ••••• •• •• •• •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
N 9000JN 7000JN 200000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
1 METHYLNAPHTHALENE
DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE
12 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 8E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 8E GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR 8UT NOT DETECTED. THE NUM8ER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSA8LE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT 8E PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
------------------
liill liii -- - - - - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT.SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
- - - - - -
03/04/91
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... . . . . . . . . . . . . •· ................ . ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
••• •• •• •• .. .. •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53764 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-20
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0915 STOP: 00/00/00
•• SAS NO.: •• CASE NO. : 15502 D. NO.: 2130 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
800U 800U 800U 800U BOOU 800U 800U 800UR 800U 800U 800U 800UR 800U 800UJ 800UR 800U 800U 800UR 800U 800U 800U 800U 3200 800U 800U 4100U 800UJ 4100U 800U 800U 800U
PHENOL BISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'-CHLOROJSOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NJTROSODJ-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE N JTROBENZENE I 50PIIORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2.4-DJCHLOROPHENOL 1.2.4-TR!CHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE --4~CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCPJ 2,4.6-TRJCHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRJCHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2--NJTROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
4100UR 800U 4100U 4100U BOOU 800U 800U eoou 800U 4100U 4100U 800U eoou eoou 4100U 1300U BOOU eoou 800U 800U 800U -800U eoou 800U 800U 800U eoou BOOU BOOU 800U eoou eoou 19
3-NJTROANJLINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINJTROPHENOL 4-NJTROPHENOL DJBENZOFURAN 2.4-DINJTROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENVL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE 4-NJTROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMJNE/DJPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DJ-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE -BENZYL'BUTYL PHTHALATE -3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZOCA)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DJ-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZOCB AND/OR KJFLUORAtHHENE BENZO-A-PYRENE JNDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A.HJANTHRACENE BENZO(GHJJPERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 01/31/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53763 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-19 •• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0855 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: Z129 MD NO: Z129
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
O.SSU MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------------------
11!!!!1 1111!1 .. liiiiliil --
METALS DATA REPORT
---

-
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
-----

-
02/01/91
••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• •• •• • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53763 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-19
CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
••• • • • MG/KG
2800 3. 7UJ 0.69UJ 4U 0.23U 0.69U
300 3.2 0.46U 2UJ 520J 7.6J
130
• • • • •
ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD
MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • • • • •
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC PROG ELEM: SSF
CITV: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0855 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NUMBER: 2129
• • • • MG/KG
3U 0.12U 2.3U 90U 0.46U 0.69U 7.6U 0.69U NA 3.2 20U 13
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM
SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • • • • • • • ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAV NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53763 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-19 COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0855 STOP: 00/00/00
••
03/04/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• ••
•• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: D. NO.: 2129 ••
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U
12U 12U 12U sou 40U
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENECI ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METIIVL ETIIVL KETONE
1,1 .I-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 18
1,2-DICHLOROPRDPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1 ,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRANS-1,3-0!CHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ
1,1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAl-!NTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPL!NG ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
l!!!!!!!I I!!!!!!!!!! -

-
-------------
liiili ---

-
------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA,
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
----
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53763 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-19
•• CASE .NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0855 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: Z129 MD NO: Z129
••
--
D3/04/91 ·
• • • • •• •• •• •• •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
60000J
N 2000JN
2000JN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
11 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPO~T ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-19 ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 53763 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0855 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2129
D3/04/91
• •••••• •• •• •• •• •• •• CASE NO.: 15502 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANAL VT! CAL RE SUL TS UG/KG ANAL VT! CAL RE SUL TS
SAS NO.:
400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 400UR 400U 400U 400U 400UR 400U 400UJ 400UR 400U 400U 400UR 400U 400U 400U 400U 570U 400U 400U 2100U 400UJ 2100U 400U 400U 400U
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHVL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHVLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPVLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHVLPHENOL N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPVLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE N ITROBENZENE ISOPllORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHVLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXV) METHANE 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1 .2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHVLPHENOL 2-METHVLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCVCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2 NITnOAIJILWE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
2100UR 400U 2100U 2100U 400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 2100U 2100U 400U 400U 400U 2100U 320J 400U 400U 400U 400U SOJ 400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 400U 18
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENVL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-·BROMOPllENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BEN20( B AND/OR K) FLUORANTl·IENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--IIIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
---

-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
----
••• •• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . . •· ................ . ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53762 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-18
CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: 2128
COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ST: NC
12/12/90 0840 STOP: 00/00/00
--
03/04/91
• • • • ••• •• •• • • •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U 12U 12U 12U 40U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ
1.1-D!CHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1.2-0ICHLOROETHANE
METIIYL EHIYL KETONE
1.1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
12U
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 16
1 ,2-D!CHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1 ,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRANS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV -ESD. ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53762 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-18 CASE. NO.: 15502 SAS NO. :
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0840 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: Z_128 MD NO: 2128
• •• •• •• •• • • • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
N 200JN BOOOJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT OCTAHYDROHEXAMETHYLINDENE
10 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
l!!!!!!!!!!I ---

-
-------------
1111:1 llllil -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
----
••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53762 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-18
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
ST: NC
12/12/90 0840 STOP: 00/00/00
--
03/04/91
• •••••• •• •• • • ••
•• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: D. NO.: Z128 ••
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390UR 390U 390U 390U
390UR 390U 390UJ 390UR 390U 390U 390UR 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 2000U 390UJ 2000U 390U 390U 390U
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPVLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
l50PHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
Z··NITROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
2000UR 390U 2000U 2000U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 2000U 2000U 390U 390U 390U 2000U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 16
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2.4-DINITROPHENOL
4-N ITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE 4-N IT ROAN I LI NE
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETllER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE
D!-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE PYRENE -BENZYL BUTYt PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTIIENE
BENZO-A-PVRENE
INDENO (1 ,2.3-CD) PVRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHIJPERVLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAV OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 01/31/91
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPOR, •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53761 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-17 •• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1650 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2127 MD NO: 2127
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.60U MG/KG CYANIDE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
i=!!!!I !!!!!!!!!!I ---

-

-
---

-

-
--

-

-
-
---- - - - - - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
-- - ---
02/01/91
METALS DATA REPORT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53761 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY STATION ID: BP-17 CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: MD NUMBER: Z127
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/11/90 1650 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 1500 ALUMINUM 3.BUJ ANTIMONY 0.72UJ ARSENIC 3U BARIUM 0.24U BERYLLIUM 0.72U CADMIUM 92 CALCIUM 2.2 CHROMIUM 0.48U COBALT 11 J COPPER 400J IRON 2.6J LEAD SOU MAGNESIUM
MG/KG 1U 0. 12U 2.4U 100U 0.48U 0.72U 30U 0.72U NA
~7 16
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
•• •• •• •• •• •••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53761 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-17
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1650 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: Z127 MD NO: Z127
•• ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ....
7000J 4000JN BOOOJN SOOOJN 6000JN 3DOOJN 4000JN 10000JN 30000JN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND
DIMETHYLHEPTANE
NONANE PROPYLHEXANE
ETHYLMETHYLHEPTANE (2 ISOMERS)
TRIMETHYLHEPTANE ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
DECANE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUIIPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MAlERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOl DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATIDN LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
l!!!!!!!I .... -----------------
.. ---
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ............... ··• ..... .
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53761
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-17 •• •• CASE NO. : 15502
----------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: 2127
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
12/11/90 1650 STOP: 00/00/00
-
03/04/91
• ••••• •• •• •• •• •• ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ...................................... .
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE
1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-DICHLOROETHVLENE)
1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
METIIVL ETllYL KETONE
1 ,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOlNOlES••• .
1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 420J 1400U 1100J 17
1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
03/04/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE.NO. 53761 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSf COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• •• STATION ID: BP-17 COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1650 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: O. NO. 2127 MD NO: 2127 •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
200000J
N 10000JN 20000JN 6000JN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
9 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS PETROLEUM PRODUCT DIHYOROMETHANONAPHTHALENE DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE TRIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERfERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MAlERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
~ - - -- - - - - --- ---- - --
-----------------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 "SAMPLE NO. 53761 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-17 ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/11/90 1650 STOP: 00/00/00
03/04/91
•••••• •• •• •• •• •• •• CASE NO. : 15502 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAS NO.: 0. NO.: 1127
2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400UR 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400UR 2400U 2400UJ 2400UR 2400U 2400U 2400UR 1600J 2400U 2400U 2400U 11000 2400U 2400U 12000U 2400UJ 12000U 2400U 2400U 2400U
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE NITROBENZENE 1'.",0PIIORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE 2.4-0ICHLOROPHENOL 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANI LINE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-NITROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2,6-0INITROTOLUENE
12000UR 2400U 12000U 12000U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 12000U 12000U 2400U 2400U 2400U 12000U 2000J 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U. 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 2400U 17
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-0INITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-0INITROPHENOL N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPflENYL PHENYL EiHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE. BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(AJANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE 01-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO( B AtlD/Oft K J FLUOftANTIIENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 .2.3-COJ PYRENE DIBENZO(A,HJANTHRACENE BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 01/31/91
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53760 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-16
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1630 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO. Z126 MD NO: Z126
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.60U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATER!AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT.
-------------------
1!!1!!111 llliiilil liiiil
METALS DATA REPORT
------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA.
------
02/01/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• •• •• • •
•• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53760 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-16
CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
••• • • • MG/KG
2800 3.SUJ 0. 72UJ 13 0.24U 0. 72U 1300 3 0.48U 6.6J 780J 23J 150
• • • • •
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM
CHROMIUM COBALT
COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • • • • •
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1630 STOP: 00/00/00
MO NUMBER: 2126
• • • • MG/KG 4.4 0.12U 2.4U 120 0.48U 0. 72U 60U 0.72U NA 3.9 40 17
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE
MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • • • • • • •••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 03/04/91
••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53760
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-16
PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1630 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
••• • • • UG/KG
12U 12U 12U 12U 30U 30U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL!
CHLOROFORM 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METIIYL ETIIYL KETONE 1,1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • • • • D. NO.: 2126 • • • • UG/KG
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 16
. . . . . • ................ .
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ
1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
• • • • •••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
liiil1sl ~ -

-
-------------
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
-----
03/04/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53760 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-16
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1630 STOP: 00/00/00
0. NO.: 2126 MD NO: 2126
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••REMARKS•••
EXCESSIVE HOLDING TIME
•••FOOTNOTES•••
N 2000JN 2000JN 60000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
PETROLEUM PROOUCT
ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE
DIHYOROMETHANONAPHTHALENE
16 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAl-!NTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN 10 BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91 •••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 'SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-16 •• • • CASE NO . 15502
53760 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1630 STOP: 00/00/00
SAS NO.: D. NO.: 2126 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 960J 770UR 770UR 4000UR 770UR 4000UR 770UR 770UR 770UR
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHVL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-0ICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-ANO/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE NITROBENZENE !5CIPHORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2.4-0ICHLOROPHENOL 1.2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2.4.6-TR!CHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2· NITROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-0INITROTOLUENE
•••REMARKS••• EXCESSIVE HOLDING TIME
4000UR 770UR 4000UR 4000UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 4000UR 4000UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 4000UR 780J 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 2000UR 770UR
770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 770UR 16
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-0INITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL OIBENZOFURAN 2.4-0INITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4,6-0INITROPHENOL N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/OIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETIJER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE 01-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZVL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIOINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLl PHTHALATE 01-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B ANO/OR K)FLUORANTHENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1.2,3-CO) PYRENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
liiiiiiiil I!!!!!!'! ----------------
.. ----
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
-----
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA.
----

-
01/31/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• .. •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53759 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-15
CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1620 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2125 11D NO: 2125
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.58U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 02/01/91
METALS DATA REPORT ... . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ................ .
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53759 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ••
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION JO: BP-15 •• CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER: •• ••••••••••••• MG/KG 2200 ALUMINUM 3.7UJ ANTIMONY 0.70UJ ARSENIC 21 BARIUM 0.23U BERYLLIUM 0.70U CADMIUM 1100 CALCIUM 2.9 CHROMIUM 0.46U COBALT 6.6J COPPER 730J IRON 13J LEAD 100 MAGNESIUM
• • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1620 STOP: 00/00/00 •• MO NUMBER: 2125 ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG 8.3 0.12U 2.30U 90U 0.46U 0.70U 40U 0. 70U NA 3.4
36 14
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
•• • • • • • • • ••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG ANO REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
liiill iiii -------

-
----· -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 03/04/91
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS~ OATA REPORT
••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53759 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-15 CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTEO BY: F SLOAN ••
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ••
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1620 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
0. NO.: 2125 MO NO: 2125 •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
SOOOJN 2000J 3000JN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
OECANE 1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND
TRIMETHYLNONANE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. .
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53759 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-15
•••••• TYPE: SOIL
•• •• SAS NO.:
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1620 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: Z125 CASE NO . : 15502 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
UG/KG
1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U
CHLOROMETHANE BROIOMETHANE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1;2-DICHLOROETHANE METIIYL ETHYL KETONE 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
UG/KG
1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 14
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1 ,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEl 1,1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
03/04/91
• • • • ••• •• •• •• •• •• • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
----------11!1!1 -
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO. ATHENS. GA.
----
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53759 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-15
CASE. NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1620 STOP: 00/00/00
0. NO.: 2125 MD NO: 2125
--
03/04/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••REMARKS••• EXCESSIVE HOLDING TIME
•••FOOTNOTES•••
200000J N
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
15 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U--MATER!AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND IIAY OR IIAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • ••••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO.
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
53759 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• STATION ID: BP-15 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502 ••••••••••••••••••••••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1200UR PHENOL
1200UR BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
1200UR 2-CHLOROPHENOL
1200UR 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1200UR 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1200UR 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1200UR 2--METHYLPHENOL
1200UR 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
1200UR (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
1200UR N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
1200UR HEXACHLOROETHANE
1200UR NITROBENZENE 1200UR ISOPHORONE
1200UR 2-NITROPHENOL
1200UR 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
1200UR BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
1200UR 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1200UR 1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1200UR NAPHTHALENE
1200UR 4-CHLOROANILINE
1200UR HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
1200UR 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
370J 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1200UR HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
1200UR 2,4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
5900UR 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1200UR 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
5900UR 2-NITROANILINE
1200UR DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
1200UR ACENAPHTHYLENE
1200UR 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
•••REMARl<.S••• EXCESSIVE HOLDING TIME
SAS NO.: ••••••
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1620 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2125 • • • • • • • • • • UG/KG
5900UR 1200UR 5900UR 5900UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 5900UR 5900UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR
5900UR 350J 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UJ 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR
1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 1200UR 14
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE
2.4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPflENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXVL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO( B AtlD/OR K) FLUORANTIIENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
• ••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------------------
--

-
--

-
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
----

-
-
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
----
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53758 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-14 •• CASE. NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1610 STOP: 00/00/00
0. NO.: 2124 MO NO: 2124
••
--
01/31/91
•••••• •• •• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.57U MG/KG CYANIDE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
03/04/91
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••• •• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53753 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-09
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1410 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2119 MD NO: 2119
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
N
40000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
20 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA--!,IOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------------------
l!!!!!!!!I -- - - - - - - --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMl:NT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
----
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . •·• ............... . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC ••• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53753 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY STATION ID: BP--09
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1410 STOP: 00/00/00
- -
03/04/91
• • • • •• •• •• • • •• ••
•• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
D. NO.: 2119
380UR PHENOL 380U BISC2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 380UR 2-CHLOROPHENOL 380U 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 380U 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE 380U 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE 380U 2-METHYLPHENOL 380UR 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 380U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL · 380U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE 380U HEXACHLOROETHANE 380UR NITROBENZENE 380U I SOPI !ORONE 380UR 2-NITROPHENOL 380UR 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 380U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 380UR 2,4-D!CHLOROPHENOL 380UR 1,2.4-TRJCHLOROBENZENE 380U NAPHTHALENE . -380U. -4-CHLOROANILINE 380U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 380UR 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 380U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 380U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADJENE CHCCP) 380UR 2.4.6-TRJCHLOROPHENOL 2000UR 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 380UJ 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2000U 2·NITROANJLINE 3BOU DIMETHYL PHTHALATE 380U ACENAPHTHYLENE 380U 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
2000UR 380U 2000UR 2000UR 380U 380U 380U 380U 3BOU 2000U 2000UR 380U 380U 3BOU 2000UR 380U 3BOU 380U 380U 380U 48J· 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 3BOU 380U 380U 380U 14
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 4-N ITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE 4-N IT ROAN I LI NE 2-METHYL-4,6-DIN!TROPHENOL N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/D!PHENYLAMJNE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETIIER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE -PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE D1-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO( B AND/OR Kl FLUOllANTI IENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 ,2.3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHJ)PERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 01/31/91
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53752 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ••
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION JD: BP-08 •• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ••
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1340 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
D. NO.: 2118 MD NO: 2118 •• • •
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
-
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 0.57U MG/KG CYANIDE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ~NALVZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANT!TATION LIMIT.
---

-

-
-

-

-
-

-
-

-

-

-
-

-
-

-
--

-
--

-
METALS DATA REPORT
------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
-----
02/01/91
••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53752 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-08 CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
••• • • • IIG/KG 2100 3.7UJ 0.69UJ 3U 0.23U 0.69U sou 2.3 0.46U 4UJ 360J 8.2J sou
• • • • •
ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM
COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • • • • •
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
ST: NC PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START: 11D NUMBER: 2118 12/11/90 1340 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • • MG/KG 1U 0.11U 2.3U 90U 0.46U 0.69U 9U 0.69U NA
2. 7 20 13
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM
SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM
ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••••• • • • • • ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND IIAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 03/04/91
•••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO.
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• • •
53752 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-OB COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1340 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• CASE NO . : 15502 SAS NO.: D. NO.: 2118
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
11U 11 U
11U 11 U 40U 20U 11 U IIU
11 U 11 U 11U IIU 11 U 11 U IIU
11 U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METIIYL ETIIYL KETONE
1, 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U
11 U
11 U 11 U 11U
11 U 11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U 11 U 11 U
11 U 13
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRANS-I ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ
1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-----

-
-------------
----------------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53752 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-08
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1340 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2118 MD NO: 2118
••
--
03/04/91
• • • ••• •• .. •• •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
6000J 3000JN 1000JN
300JN
2000JN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
7 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
TETRAHYDROMETHANOINDENE
ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS)
METHYLPROPENYLBENZENE
TETRAMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS)
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 03/04/91
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 53752 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-08 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502 •••••• UG/KG
380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380UR 380U 380U 380U 380UR ·380U 380UJ 380UR 380U 380U 380UR 1600 380U 380U 380U 63J 380U 380U 1900U 380UJ 1900U 380U 380U 380U
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE NITROBENZENE ISOPllORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2 NITROANILJtJE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
SAS NO.: • • • • • • • • • •
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1340 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2118 • • • • • UG/KG
1900UR 380U 1900U 1900U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 1900U 1900U 380U 380U 380U 1900U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U •380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 13
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENVL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPllENYL PIIENYL ETIIER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO( B AND/OR K) FLUORANTIIENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 ,2,3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
• ••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
----

-
--
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
-----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
-

-
-

-
--
01/31/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53751 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION JD: BP-07
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1155 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2117 MD NO: 2117
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.58U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THf MINIMUM OUANTJTATION LIMIT.
-
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 02/01/91 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ...... . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53751
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-07 • • CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER: •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
400 ALUMINUM 3.7UJ ANTIMONY
0.70UJ ARSENIC
4U BARIUM 0.23U BERYLLIUM
0.70U CADMIUM 66 CALCIUM 2.8 CHROMIUM
0. 46U COBALT 35J COPPER 600J IRON
4.1J LEAD 60U MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1155 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NUMBER: 2117
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG 1U 0.12U 2.3U 90U 0.46U 0.70U 7.7U 0. 70U NA
3 42 14
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••••• • • • • •••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-----

-
-------------
-----
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-07 •• •• CASE NO . : 15502
-------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
----
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
NO. 53751 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: 2117
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
12/11/90 1155 STOP: 00/00/00
-

-
03/04/91
• •••••• •• •• •• •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
11U 11 U 11 U 11 U 40U 30U
11U
11 U 11 U
11 U
11 U 11U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U
CHLOROMETHANE
BR~ETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1 ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETIIYL KETONE
1. 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
11 U 11U
11 U 13
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEIIENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 03/04/91
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53751 SAMPLE TYPE': SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-07
CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1155 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2117 MD NO: 2117
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
SOOOJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------------------
-- -- - --- - - --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
- - - - --
03/04/91
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53751 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID, BP-07 ••
SAMPLE TYPE; SOIL PROG ELEM; SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START;
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/11/90 1155 STOP, 00/00/00
•• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
D. NO.: 2117
370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370UR 370U 370U 370U 370UR 370U 370UJ 370UR 370U 370U 370UR 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 1900U 370UJ 1900U 370U 370U 370U
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1.3-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE N ITROBENZENE ISOPHORONE 2-NJTROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1 .2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROAN I LI NE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE -4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADJENE CHCCPJ 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-·NI TROANILINE DIMETHYL PHIHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
1900UR 370U 1900U 1900U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 1900U 1900U 370U 370U 370U 1900U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U .370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 13
3-N IT ROAN I LI NE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/D!PHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPflENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE _ . BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZJDINE BENZOCA)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORANTIIENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 .2.3-CDJ PYRENE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/31/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53750 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-06 •• CASE. NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2116 Mil NO: 2116
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 0.57U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-TERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------------------
liiill lliii -----------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53762 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-18
•• CASE .NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0840 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2128 MO NO: 2128
••
-

-
01/31/91
•••••• •• .. •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.58U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 02/01/91
METALS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53762 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ••
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ••
•• STATION ID: BP-18
•• CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
COLLECTION START: 12/12/90 0840 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
MD NUMBER: 2128 ••
•• ••
••• • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••• • • • • ...
MG/KG
2200 3.7UJ 0. 70UJ 6.6 0.23U 0. 70U
890
3 0.47U 14J 560J 18J 98
ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM
CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG 3.7 0.12U 2.3U ,oou
0.47U 0. 70U 40U 0.70U NA
3 32 14
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------------------
----

-
--
METALS DATA REPORT
-----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
----
••• •• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . •· ................. . • • • • • •• • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53750 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-<J6
CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
MD NUMBER: 2116
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
12/11/90 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
-

-
02/01/91
• •••••• •• •• •• • • ••
••• • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
MG/KG
2400 ALUMINUM
3.6UJ ANTIMONY
0.68UJ ARSENIC
4.8 BARIUM
0.23U BERYLLIUM
0.68U CADMIUM
500 CALCIUM
3. 1 CHROMIUM
0. 46U COBALT
6UJ COPPER
550J IRON 4.8J LEAD
60U MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
2U 0.11U 2.3U 90U 0.46U 0.68U 20U 0.68U NA 2.9 23 12
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERfERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. .
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
•••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 'SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY 53750 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• STATION ID: BP--06 COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1130 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: 0. NO.: 2116 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• • • • • •••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U CHLOROIIETHANE 12U 1,2-0ICHLOROPROPANE 12U BROIIOMETHANE 12U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U VINYL CH LOR IDE 12U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U CHLOROETHANE 12U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 70U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 12U 1 .1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE 30U ACETONE 12U BENZENE 12U CARBON DISULFIDE 12U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U BROMOFORM 12U 1 ,1-0ICHLOROETHANE 12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 12U 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 12U CHLOROFORM 12U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 12U 1,2-0ICHLOROETHANE 12U 1,1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 12U METllYL ETIIYL KETONE 12U TOLUENE 12U 1 ,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 12U CHLOROBENZENE 12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 12U ETHYL BENZENE 12U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 12U STYRENE 12U TOTAL XYLENES 14 PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
03/04/91
• • • • ••• •• •• ••
• • • •
•• •• • ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •MAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-------------------
11111 lliliil liiiili ------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
-

-
---

-
03/04/91
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53750 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED 8Y: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: 8P-06
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: Z116 MD NO: Z116
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
SOOOJ 5 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 8E LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO 8E GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 'SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-06 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 53750 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSf COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
SAS NO.: D. NO.: Z116
03/04/91
• •••••• •• •• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RE SUL TS 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380UR 380U 380U 380U 380UR 380U 380UJ •380UR 380U 380U 380UR 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 1900U 380UJ 1900U 380U 380U 380U
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1.3-DJCHLOROBENZENE 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE NITROBENZENE ISOPHORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2 NITROANI LltJE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1900UR 380U 1900U 1900U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 1900U 1900U 380U 380U 380U 1900U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 14
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DIN!TROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER fLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4··BROMOPIIENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE fLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)fLUORANTIIENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1,2.3-CDJ PYRENE DIBENZO(A.HJANTHRACENE BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINI-QIJANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
l!!!!'!!!!!!I 1!!!!1!!1!!11 ----------------
-am ----
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
-

-
---
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS. GA.
-

-
--

-
-
01/31/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53749 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-05
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1105 STOP: 00/00/00
0. NO.: 2115 MD NO: 2115
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.58U MG/KG CYANIDE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U--MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. METALS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-184 . SAMPLE NO. 53749 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY STATION ID: BP-05 CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1105 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NUMBER: 2115
02/01/91
• •••••• •• •• •• • • •• ••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••• MG/KG 2200 3.7UJ 0.70UJ 4U 0.23U 0.70U 140 2.6 0.47U 2J 500J 3.4J 60U
ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG 1U 0.12U 2.3U 100U 0.47U 0.70U 7.7U 0. 70U NA
2.8
18 14
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER
SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
l!!!l!!!!I ------------------
-------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
-----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
------
03/04/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ...... -.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• •• •• • •
•• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53749 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-OS
CASE NO. : 15502 SAS NO.:
PROO ELEM: SSF
CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: 2115
COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ST: NC
12/11/90 1105 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
13U 13U 13U 13U
30U 30U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U
CHLORalETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1 ,1-0ICHLOROETHENE(1,1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METIIYL ETHYL KETONE
1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U . 13U
13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 13U 21
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING ANO REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STAHON ID: BP-05 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
NO. 53749 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1105 STOP: 00/00/00
SAS NO.: D. NO.: 2115
03/04/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR
420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 2l00UR 420UR 2100UR 420UR 420UR 420UR
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE
I .4-DICHLOROBENZENE
I .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE ISOPIIORONE 2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROAN I LI NE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3--METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
2l00UR 420UR 2100UR 2100UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 2100UR 2100UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 2100UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR
420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 420UR 21
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE
2.4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE 4-NJTROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PIIENVL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO( A) ANTHRACENE-CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHVLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BEtJZOC 8 AND/OR K) FLUORANTllENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PVRENE
DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA--NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
---------------

-
---
-liiii ----
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
-

-
---
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
-----

-
01/31/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53748 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-04
•• CASE .NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1045 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2114 MD NO: 2114
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.60U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT.
-
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. D2/01/91
••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• •• •• •• •• • •
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53748 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-04 CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
••• • • • MG/KG
2800 3.8UJ O. 72UJ 3U 0.24U 0.72U 77 3.3 0.48U 3UJ 440J 4.5J 60U
• • • • •
ALUMINUM ANTIMONY
ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM
CHROMIUM COBALT -COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • • • •
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
MD NUMBER: 2114 12/11/90 1045 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • MG/KG 1U 0.12U 2.40U 100U 0.48U 0. 72U 20U 0.72U NA 2.7 21 16
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • • • ••••••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATER!AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-----

-
-------------
-1!1!11 1!!111
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
-----

-
03/04/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• • •
•• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53748 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-04
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/11/90 1045 STOP: 00/00/00
•• CASE NO.; 15502 SAS NO.: D. NO.: 2114 ••
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U 12U 12U 12U 40U 20U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U
CHLOROMETHANE
BRCM:>METHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1 .2-DICHLORDETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETIIYL KETONE
1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROIIODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
12U 12U
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U
16
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROIIOCHLOROMETHANE
1 ,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
li!!iiiil
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53748 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ••
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC ••
•• STATION ID: BP-04 •• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1045 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
D. NO.: Z114 MD NO: 2114 ••
•• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
600J 1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND
SOJN PHENYLETHANONE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MAltRIAL WAS ANALYZtD FOR BUl NOl DElECTtD. !Ht NUMBtR IS THE MINIMUM QUANTIIATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
li!l!m lllll!I --------------
- -- -- --- - -- -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
- - - - --
03/04/91
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . ·• ................ . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••• •• •• •• • • ••
••• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53748 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC •• •• •• ••
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-04 12/11/90 1045 STOP: 00/00/00
•• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: ... . . . . . . . . . • ....................................................... . D. NO.: 2114
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390UR 390U 390U 390U 390UR 390U 390UJ 390UR 390U 390U 390UR 390U 390U 390U -390u 390U 390U 390U 2000U 390UJ
2000U 390U 390U 390U
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE NITROBENZENE ISOPHORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1.2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE -4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2· tJI TROAtJI LI NE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
2000UR 390U 2000U 2000U 390U 390U 68J 390U 390U 2000U 2000U 390U 390U 390U 2000U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U · 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 16
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENVL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSOOIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4·BROMOP11ENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE CHCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE AN THRACE NE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE · BENZVl:·BUTVL-PHTHALATE 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZOCA)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BEtJ20C B AtJD/OR K) FLUORANTIIEtJE BENZO-A-PVRENE INDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PVRENE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--tlATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 01/31/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53747 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION 10: BP-03
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1026 STOP: 00/00/00
0. NO.: Z113 MO NO: Z113
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.60U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-------------------
----

-
!!!II liiiil1 ------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-18-4 SAMPLE NO. 53747 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-03
CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
••• • • • MG/KG
4100 3.8UJ 1UJ 5.5 0.24U 0.72U 310
4 0.48U 24J 1300J 5.4J 140
• • • • • • •
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY ARSENIC
BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM
COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD
MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
• • • • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • • • • •
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
MO NUMBER: 2113 12/11/90 1026 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • MG/KG 3.9 0.12U
2.4U 130 0.48U 0.72U 20U 0.72U NA
5 25 16
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY
NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM
SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM
ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • •
02/01/91
• • • •
• • • •
• •• •• •• •• • • •• • ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... . . . . . . . . . . . •·• ...... .
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53747 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-03
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • .. -..... . • •••••••••••••••• SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: 2113
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/11/90 1026 STOP: 00/00/00
03/04/91
• • • • ••• •• •• •• •• • • •• •• CASE NO . : 15502 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U 12U 12U 12U 40U
30U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U
12U 12U 12U 12U
CHLOROIIETHANE BROIIOIIETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE METllYL ETIIYL KETONE 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROIIODICHLOROIIETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 17
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1 ,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
----11!!1!! ---liiii ---
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53747 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-03
•• CASE. NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1026 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2113 MD NO: 2113
••
--
03/04/91
• • • • •• •• •• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
N PETROLEUM PRODUCT
30000J 20 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. !HE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R--OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53747 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-03
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON 5T: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1026 STOP: 00/00/00
•• • • CASE NO . 15502 SAS NO.: D. NO.: 2113
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390UR 390U 390U 390U 390UR 390U 390UJ 390UR 390U 390U 390UR 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 2000U 390UJ zooou 390U 390U 390U
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'-CHLOROI50PROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL
N-NITR050DI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE 150PHORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCPJ
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-tH TROANIL !NE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/KG
2000UR 390U 2000U 2000U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 2000U 2000U 390U 390U 390U 2000U 390U 390U 390U 390U 80J 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 390U 17
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITR050DIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4--BROMOPIIENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(AJANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE B15(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BEtJZO( B AND/OR K J FLUORANTHEtJE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1 ,2.3-CDJ PYRENE DIBENZO(A,HJANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
03/04/91
• •••
• • • •
••• •• •• •• •• •• ...
•••FOOlNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-E5TIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
---111111111 1!!!!11!!1 ----------
-11!1!!!!
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
----

-
01/31/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53746 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-02
•• CASE. NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1000 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2112 MO NO: 2112
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.65U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 02/01/91
METALS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53746 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: BP-02 • • CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER: •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG 4900 ALUMINUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
4.2UJ ANTIMONY 0.78UJ ARSENIC 8.3 BARIUM 0.26U BERYLLIUM 0.78U CADMIUM 260 CALCIUM 4 . 3 CH ROM !UM 0. 52U COBALT 6UJ COPPER 730J IRON 11J LEAD 140 MAGNESIUM
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1000 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NUMBER: 2112
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG 3U 0.13U 2.6U 130 0.52U 0. 78U sou 0. 78U NA 5.8 26 23
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • •
)
•••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R--QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPL!NG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--
----

-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
!!Bl -liiii -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
-----

-
03/04/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • •••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••• • ••••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO.
•• SOURCE:
•• STATION ID: BP-02 •• •• CASE NO.: 15502
53746 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: 2112
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
12/11/90 1000 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12U 12U 12U 12U 40U 30U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROIO,IETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHVLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METIIYL ETHYL KETONE
1, 1. I-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 20
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1 .1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1.1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
l!!!!!!!!!I
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53746
•• SOURCE: •• STATION ID: BP-02 ••
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY; WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 1000 STOP: 00/00/00
SAS NO.; D. NO.: 2112
03/04/91
• • • • ••• •• •• •• •• •• •• CASE NO. : 15502 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
410UR 410UR 410UR 41DUR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 41DUR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 2100UR ·410UR
2100UR 410UR 410UR 410UR
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE ISOPHORONE 2-NI TROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1 .2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROAN I LI NE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2· NITROAtJILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
•••REMARKS••• EXCESSIVE HOLDING TIME
2100UR 410UR 2100UR 2100UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 2100UR 2100UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 2100UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR :rn~~ 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 410UR 20
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROIIOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZOCAJANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO( B AND/OR K )FLUORAtJTI IENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE.MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
llliil lllii1 -
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
--

-
-SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
-

-
-

-
--
01/31/91
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53745 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: BP-01
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 0935 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2111 MD NO: 2111
•• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
0.56U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
I!!!!!!!!!!!!
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. D2/01/91
••• •• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . •·• ................ . • • • • • • • • • • • . ...... •-......... . • • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53745 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-01
CASE NUMBER: 15502 SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START: MD NUMBER: Z111
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/11/90 0935 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
MG/KG 1500 ALUMINUM
3.6UJ ANTIMONY
0.68UJ ARSENIC 4U BARIUM
0.23U BERYLLIUM
0.68U CADMIUM 240 CALCIUM
1. 9 CHROMIUM 0.45U COBALT 48J COPPER
150J IRON 7.7J LEAD SOU MAGNESIUM
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG 1U 0. 11U
5 90U 0.45U 0.68U 10U 0.68U NA 1. 8 26 11
MANGANESE MERCURY
NICKEL POTASSIUM
SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
• ••••••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-----------------
-lliiill
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
----!!!!!!!!I l!!!!!!!!!I
03/04/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• .. •• •• .. •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53745 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
STATION ID: BP-01
CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: 1111
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/11/90 0935 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 30U 30U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENEC1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
METIIYL ETIIYL KETONE
1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROIIODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CJS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1.2-TRJCHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROIIOFORM METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
l!!!!I
liiiii
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53745 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY
•• STATION ID: BP-01
•• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 12/11/90 0935 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2111 MD NO: 2111
••
03/04/91
• ••••• •• •• •• •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
2000J
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM QUANT!TAT!ON LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
mm 1111111 1!!!11 l!l!!!I!!!! -------------
----------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
-

-
-

-
-l!!!!!!!!I
03/04/91
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• • • •• ••
•• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 53745 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNT¥
STATION ID: BP-01
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
12/11/90 0935 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: 2111 •• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RE SUL TS
360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360UR 360U 360U 360U 360UR 360U 360UJ 360UR 360U 360U 360UR 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 1900U 360UJ 1900U 360U 360U 360U
PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.4~DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPVLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE 150PHORONE 2-N IT ROPHE NOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL Bl5(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANILINE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2 ·tJITROAtJILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
1900UR 360U 1900U 1900U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 1900U 1900U 360U 360U 360U 1900U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 11
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE 4-NITROANI LINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPflENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE D1-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE ---BENZYL BUTYL ·PHTHAL:ATE
3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE BIS{2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
D1-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZOC B AND/OR K) FLUORANTI IEtJE
BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 ,2.3-CDJ PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
l!!!!!!!!!I
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. 05/07/91
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• •••
PROJECT NO. 91--617 SAMPLE NO. 57272 SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUDBLK
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-003-MB
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/15/91 1006 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 0.21U MG/KG CYANIDE
• •• •• •• •• • • • ••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
--- - - - - ---- - - - -- - - -
- - -
METALS DATA REPORT
l!!!lll!!!!II ---
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
- -- -
I!!!!!!!
05/03/91
••• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-617 . SAMPLE NO. 57272 SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-003-MB •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 2.0U SILVER 6.0U ARSENIC
NA BORON 140 BARIUM 1.6 BERYLLIUM 1.0U CADMIUM 2.0U COBALT 2.2 CHROMIUM 5.6 COPPER 2.0U MOLYBDENUM 4.5 NICKEL 19 LEAD 6.0U ANTIMONY 8.0U SELENIUM 5.0U TIN 680 STRONTIUM lOU TELLURIUM 120 TITANIUM 20U THALLIUM 6.2 VANADIUM 24 YTTRIUM 67 ZINC
NA ZIRCONIUM 0.05U MERCURY 16000 ALUMINUM 450 MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUDBLK COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START: 04/15/91 1006 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG 16000 4600 8300 15000 1000
5
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SODIUM POTASSIUM PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • • • • • • . ..
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINI-QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-617 . SAMPLE NO. 57272 SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUOBLK SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION IO:·NH-003-MB
•••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/15/91 1006 STOP: 00/00/00
05/08/91
• ••••• •• •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 440U 440U 44U 44U 44U 440U 44U 44U 440U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 ,1-0ICHLOROETHENE(l.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1 ,1 ,I-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1-0ICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
44U 440U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 440U 44U 44U 44U 44U 6.3J 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 44U 5.0
CIS-1,3-0ICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1.1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 .1 .1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-ANO/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1 ,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 .2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-----=-------------
--

-
-l!!!!l!I 1!!!11!1 -
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
--
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
-

-
-

-
--
05/20/91
••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
•• STATION ID: NH-003-MB
NO. 57272 SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUDBLK PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/15/91 1006 STOP: 00/00/00
•• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
14U 14U 14U 6.9U 14U 6.9U 6.9U 6.9U 6.9U 35U 14U 27U 27U 27U 35U
86U 350U 350U 350U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLDR EPDXIDE
ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRJN 4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDTJ 4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDEJ
4.4'-DDD (P.P'-DDDJ
ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 ( AROCLOR 1221 )
•••FOOTNOlfS•••
350U 350U 350U 350U 1400U
69U 35U 5.0
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2
BETA CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CJS-NONACHLOR /2
OXYCI ILORDANE ( OCT ACIILOREPOX IDE) /2
METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U--IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT. C-CONFIRIIED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
I!!!!!!!
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 04/30/91 ••• ............ • .................... . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• ••
•• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57272 SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUDBLK SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-003--MB
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/15/91 1006 STOP: 00/00/00 • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2BOOU 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2BOOU 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2800U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2,3,4.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2--METHYLPHENOL 2-N IT ROAN I LI NE 2-NITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-N IT ROAN I LI NE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE At,ITI lnACEIJE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2800U 1400U 1400U 1400U 5.0
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PflTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCPJ HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1.2.3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPVLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE N ITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PIIENOL PYRENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
--......, ------------
----1!!!1111
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA RePORT ••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57269 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-002-MB ••
-liiii -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
-- -- -
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUDBLK PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/15/91 1005 STOP: 00/00/00
l!!!!!!!I
05/07/91
•••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 0.21U MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUIIPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE IIINIMUII OUANTITATION LIMIT.
!!!!!!
METALS DATA REPORT ••• •••••••••••••••••••• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-617 . SAMPLE NO. 57269 SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NW-002-MB
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG 1.0U 3.0U NA
86 1 . 1 o.sou 1.0U 1.0U
4. 7 2.9
2. 1
34 3.0U 4.0U 2.5U
150 5.0U
15 10U 1 .0 19 78 NA 0.05U 9100
64
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
05/03/91 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUDBLK PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN • •• •• •• • • • • • • • • • • • •
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/15/91 1005 STOP: 00/00/00
• • • • MG/KG
4000 2200 4400 15000 530
6
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
POTASSIUM PERCENT MOISTURE
• • • • • • • • • •
• • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-----

-
-

-

-

-
-

-

-

-
-

-

-
1!!!!!!11 1!!11!!!1 !!!!!II ---liiiil -----
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 . SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-002-MB ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57269 SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUDBLK • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/15/91 1005 STOP: 00/00/00
05/08/91
••••••• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
• •
53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 530U 530U 53U 53U 53U 530U 53U 53U 530U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-0ICHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DI.SULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DJCHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CJS-1.2-0JCHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1.1.1-TRJCHLOROETHANE 1.1-0JCHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
53U 530U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 530U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 53U 6.0
CIS-1 ,3-DJCHLOROPROPENE METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DJCHLOROPROPENE 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1.1 ,1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM
BROMOBENZENE 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.4-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-0ICHLOROBENZENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS K~ TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-002--MB
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57269 SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUDBLK PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/15/91 1005 STOP: 00/00/00
05/20/91
• • • ••• .. .. .. .. .. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
14U 14U 14U 6.9U 14U 6.9U 14U 14U 14U 34U 14U 27U 27U 27U 34U
86U 340U 340U 340U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) OELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT) 4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE) 4.4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD) ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE> /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
340U 340U 340U 340U 1400U
68U 34U 6.0
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCllLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE) /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
--

-
-11!!!!1!!!!1 l!!!!!!l!!I -&al liliil
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EKTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
----

-
04/30/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• •• • • ••
•• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57269 SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUDBLK
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
STATION ID: NW-002-MB
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 04/15/91 1005 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
N PETROLEUM PRODUCT
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... . . . . . . . . . . . ' ..... •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NW-002-MB ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 57269 SAMPLE TYPE: DRILMUDBLK PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/15/91 1005 STOP: 00/00/00
04/30/91
• ••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2700U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2700U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2700U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3,4.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-N ITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-N IT ROAN I LI NE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTI IRACENE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 1400U 2700U 140J 1400U 1400U 6.0
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A.HJANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCPJ HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1 .2,3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITRDSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE rllEtJOL PYRENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
11!!111 -
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
liiil --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESO. ATHENS. GA.
---

-
-

-
05/07/91
••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• • •
PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57214 SAMPLE TYPE: SED!MBLK PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
STATION IO: NH-001-MB WELL SAND BLANK COLLECTION START: 04/11/91 1200 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
o.2u MG/KG CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57214 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIMBLK SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-001--ilB WELL SAND BLANK
•••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/11/91 1200 STOP: 00/00/00
05/01/91
• ••••• •• •• • • •• ••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • MG6KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MG/KG sou lOU
72 lOOU 200U
0
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 1. U SILVER .3.DU ARSENIC NA BORON 1 .OU BARIUM a.sou BERYLLIUM D.SOU CADMIUM 1.0U COBALT 1. OU CHROMIUM 1 .OU COPPER 1 . OU MOLYBDENUM 2.0U NICKEL 4.0U LEAD 3.0U ANTIMONY 4.0U SELENIUM 2.SU TIN 1 . DU STRONTIUM 5.0U TELLURIUM 1 .OU TITANIUM lOU THALLIUM 1.0U VANADIUM 1.0U YTTRIUM 1.0U ZINC NA ZIRCONIUM 0.0SU MERCURY 12 ALUMINUM 1 . OU MANGANESE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SODIUM POTASSIUM PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--ilATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
-iilii1 --liiiiiil -- -- --- - - - --
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
••• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57214 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIMBLK SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-001-MB WELL SAND BLANK
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/11/91 1200 STOP: 00/00/00
04/23/91
• • • • •• •• •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 250U 250U 25U 25U 25U 250U 25U 25U 250U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROM£THANE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE
CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLDROMETHANE
25U 250U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 250U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U 25U
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1 .1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1.1.1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1 ,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
-
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57214 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-MB WELL SAND BLANK
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIMBLK PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
05/07/91
•• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
04/11/91 1200 STOP: 00/00/00
•••••• •• •• ••
15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 15U 30U 30U 30U 30U 30U 30U BOU 160U 160U 160U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANEl DELTA-BHC ENOOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4,4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT) 4.4'-DDE (P,P'-DDEl 4.4'-DDD (P,P'-DDDl ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
160U 160U 160U 160U 1200U
65U 30U
0
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCHLORDANE COCTACHLOREPOXIDEl /2 METHOXVCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS -TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMEO BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - --- -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
- - - - -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
- - - - -
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~ . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57214 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIMBLK •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001--MB WELL SAND BLANK ••
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/11/91 1200 STOP: 00/00/00
-
04/23/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 2500U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 2500U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 2500U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U
(3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL 1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-NJTROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROAN I LI NE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-N ITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTHRACENE BENZO(AJANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U
1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 1200U 2500U 1200U 1200U 1200IJ
0.0
BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BISC2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A,HJANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADJENE (HCCPJ HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1,2,3-CDJ PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMJNE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PYRENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESO. ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 54463 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• ••
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: TBS •• CASE .NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: ••
PROG ELEM: 55F COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/13/90 1535 STOP: 00/00/00 0. NO.: 1141 MO NO:
• • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
100J 2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG ANO REANALYSIS 15 NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-iliiil iiiii --
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
- - - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
- - - - -
••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 54463 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY STATION ID: TBS
CASE NO. : 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: Z141
COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ST: NC 12/13/90 1535 STOP: 00/00/00
-
03/04/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANAL YT! CAL RESULTS UG/KG ANAL VT I CAL RE SUL TS
11U CHLOROMETHANE llU BROMOMETHANE 11U VINYL CHLORIDE 11U CHLOROETHANE SOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE 20U ACETONE llU CARBON DISULFIDE 11U 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 11U 1,1-DJCHLOROETHANE 11U 1,2-DJCHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 11 U CHLOROFORM 11U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11 U IIETIIYL ETHYL KETONE 11U 1,1, I-TRICHLOROETHANE 11U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
llU 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11U CJS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) llU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE llU 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11 U BENZENE 11U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11 U BROMOFORII llU METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE llU METHYL BUTYL KETONE 11U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 11U 1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 11 U TOLUENE llU CHLOROBENZENE 11U ETHYL BENZENE 11U STYRENE llU TOTAL XYLENES 6 PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUIIPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 03/04/91 EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 54463 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: TBS
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/13/90 1535 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
SAS NO.: D. NO.: Z141 •• CASE NO.: 15502 ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS NA PHENOL NA BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER NA 2-CHLOROPHENOL NA 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE NA 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE NA 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE NA 2-METHYLPHENOL NA 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER NA (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL NA N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAM!NE NA HEXACHLOROETHANE NA NITROBENZENE NA !50PIIORONE NA 2-NITROPHENOL NA 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL NA BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE NA 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL NA 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NA NAPHTHALENE NA 4-CHLOROANILINE NA HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE NA 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL NA 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE NA HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) NA 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL NA 2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL NA 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE NA Z·NITROANILINE NA DIMETHYL PHTHALATE NA ACENAPHTHYLENE NA 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
NA 3-NITROANILINE NA ACENAPHTHENE NA 2.4-DINITROPHENOL NA 4-NITROPHENOL NA DIBENZOFURAN NA 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE NA DIETHYL PHTHALATE NA 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER NA FLUORENE NA 4-N!TROANILINE NA 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL NA N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NA 4-BROMOPIIENYL PflENYL ETHER NA HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) NA PENTACHLOROPHENOL NA PHENANTHRENE NA ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE NA DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE NA FLUORANTHENE NA PYRENE NA BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE NA 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE NA BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE NA CHRYSENE NA BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE NA DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE NA BEIJZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTUENE NA BENZO-A-PYRENE NA INDENO (1.2,3-CD) PYRENE NA DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE NA BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION,.
-----

-
-------------
-----

-
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
-----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEM!:NT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
------
04/25/91
••• • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••• •• •• •• • • •• •• .. ••
PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57267 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
STATION ID: NW-002-FB
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
04/16/91 1010 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U · 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 12U 5.0U 5.0U sou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 1.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
1. 1-DICHLOROETHANE
VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
2.2· DICIILOROPROPANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM .
1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1. 1-DICHLOROPROPENE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DIBROMOM!:THANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROBENZENE
1 .1 .1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYL BENZENE
(M--AND/OR P-)XYLENE
O·XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM
BROMOBENZENE 1 .1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE
0-CHLOROTOLUENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.4-0ICHLOROBENZENE
1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS K_,. TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATER!AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE UINIUUU QUANTITATION LIMIT.
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESO, ATHENS, GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57266 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION 10: NH-002-EB
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/16/91 0935 STOP: 00/00/00
05/07/91
• ••••• •• •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIIIIJII QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT.
- - -- - - -
METALS DATA REPORT
- - - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
- - - - -
••• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57266 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-002-EB
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/16/91 0935 STOP: 00/00/00
-
05/03/91
• • • • •• •• •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
lOU 30U NA 10U 5.0U 5.0U 10U 10U 10U lOU 20U 40U
30U 40U 25U 10U sou 10 100U 10U 10U lOU
NA 0.3U 100U lOU
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD
ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
0.50U 0.10U 0.050U 1.0U 2.0U
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA'-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 04/27/91
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57266 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-002-EB
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/16/91 0935 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
100JN
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
JSOPROPANOL
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-llillil iiiil liii --
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
llii -----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
- - - - - -
94/27/91 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . • ....... .
•• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57266 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ••
•• STATION ID: NH--002-EB CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/16/91 0935 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
O.66J 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU sou 12U 5.OU 5.OU s.ou 12U s.ou 5.OU sou s.ou 5.OU 5.OU s.ou 5.OU 5.OU 1.OU s.ou s.ou 5.OU s.ou
CHlOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROlal!ETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(1 .1-0ICHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRJCHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
s.ou 12U 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 12U s.ou s.ou 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU ·s.ou s.ou 5.OU s.ou 5.OU s.ou 5.OU
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-DJCHLOROPROPENE 1.1.2-TRJCHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 ,1.1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-JXYLENE O-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 ,2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE O-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •MAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE·GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
-
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57266 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-002-EB ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/16/91 0935 STOP: 00/00/00
05/20/91
• •••••• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
• •
0.10U 0.10U 0.10U o.osou 0.10U o.osou 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.62U 2.5U 2.5U 2.5U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT) 4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDEl 4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD) ENDRIN END05ULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
2.SU 2.SU 2.SU 2.5U IOU
o.sou 0.25U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE /2 ALPHA-CHLORDENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACIILOREPOXIDE l /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
- - - - ------- ------ -
- -- - - - -- - --- ------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-002-EB
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
57266 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/16/91 0935 STOP: 00/00/00
04/27/91
• ••••• •• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
••
IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 1OU 2OU IOU IOU IOU IOU 2OU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 1OU IOU IOU lOU 2OU 1OU IOU IOU
10U IOU
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1 .2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3.4.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4,5-TRJCHLOROPHENOL 2.4.6-TR!CHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2·-METHYL-4 .6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-NITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANHIRACENE BENZO(AJANTHRACENE BENZO<B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
,ou 1OU ,ou
1OU lOU ,ou 1OU 1OU 1OU lOU ,ou
10U IOU IOU lOU 1OU ,ou
10U lOU lOU IOU 1OU 1OU 1OU 1OU 1OU 2OU lOU lOU lOU
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI~N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PIIENOL PYRENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. 05/07/91
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57213 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-EB EQUIP RINSE BLK ••
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSf COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/11/91 1115 STOP: 00/00/00 •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERfERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUIIPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE IIINIIIUII QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-----

-
-
METALS DATA REPORT
-

-
---
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
-----

-
05/01/91
••••••••••••••• • •••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• ••
•• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57213
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
•• STATION ID: NH-001-EB EQUIP RINSE BLK
••
SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
04/11/91 1115 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2.0U 6.0U NA 2.0U 1.0U 1.0U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0U 4.0U 8.0U 6.0U 8.0U 5.0U 2. 1 IOU 11 20U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0U NA
0.2U 40U 2.0U
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT
CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM
THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM
ZINC ZIRCONIUM
MERCURY
ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
0.28 0.020U
0.021 0.20U 0.40U
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATED VALUE •N-PRESUIIPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT .............. , ....... . •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57213 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-EB EQUIP RINSE BLK ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/11/91 1115 STOP: 00/00/00
04/19/91
• •••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 50U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 50U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(!,1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1 ,!-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1 ,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
----

-
----_,_ -------
-------iliil --- - - - --
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57213 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-EB EQUIP RINSE BLK ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMl:NT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN ST: NC 04/11/91 1115 STOP: 00/00/00
05/07/91
••••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.038J 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 1. SU
1. SU 1.5U
1. SU
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANEJ DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT) 4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDEJ 4.4'-DDD (P.P'-DDDJ ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
1. 5U
1. SU 1.5U 1.5U 10U
0.50U 0.25U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDEJ /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
•••REMARKS••• •••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR Ml:TABOLITES Of TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57213 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-001-EB EQUIP RINSE BLK
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSf COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/11/91 1115 STOP: 00/00/00
04/23/91
• • • • •• •• •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
2JN DODECANOIC ACID
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERfERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-liiiii iili ---
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
-----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
- - -- - -
04/23/91
••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57213 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• STATION ID: NH-001-EB EQUIP RINSE BLK COLLECTION START: 04/11/91 1115 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 20U IOU IOU IOU IOU 20U IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU ,ou IOU IOU IOU IOU 20U IOU IOU IOU 1OU IOU
(3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3.4.6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4.5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-NITROANILINE 2-NITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTIIRACENE BENZO(AJANTHRACENE BENZOCB AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU
IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 1OU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU
IOU IOU 2OU IOU IOU
IOU
BENZOCGHIJPERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 815(2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE B15(2-CHLOROETHVLJ ETHER B15(2-ETHVLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTIIALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE CHCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1 .2,3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE N ITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PVRENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER 15 THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA,
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57261 SAMPLE TYPE: 8LKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• STATION ID: NH-001-FB COLLECTION START: 04/16/91 0945 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
05/07/91
• ••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N--PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
m!!!!I l!!!!l!!I! l!!!!I m:I == liiliiil iiil iiiii iiii ---

-
--
METALS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57261
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT·
STATION ID: NH-001-FB
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/16/91 0945 STOP: 00/00/00
05/03/91
• • • • ••• •• •• •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU 30U NA IOU 5.0U 5.0U IOU IOU IOU lOU 20U 40U 30U 40U 25U IOU sou ,ou 100U ,ou
IOU IOU NA 0.3U 100U IOU
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM
COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM
YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
o.sou 0.10U o.osou 1.0U 2.0U
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM
IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS OATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57261 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-FB ••
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/16/91 · 0945 STOP: 00/00/00
04/25/91
• ••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U sou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 1.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOME THANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2. 2··0 I Cl ILOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1.3-0ICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 .1 .1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE CM-ANO/OR P-)XYLENE O··XVLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1. 1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1 .2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
liiil!lll!I -------------
liiiiil liiiiil liiii liiiil liiii iiii iilii ---------
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT ••• • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57261 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-FB
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/16/91 0945 STOP: 00/00/00
05/20/91
••••••• •• .. •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0. 12UJ 0.12UJ 0. 12UJ 0.062UJ 0. 12UJ 0.062UJ 0. 12UJ 0. 12UJ 0. 12UJ 0.31UJ 0.12UJ 0.25UJ 0.25UJ
0.25UJ 0.31UJ 0. 78UJ 3. 1UJ
3. 1 UJ 3. 1UJ
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) OIELDRIN 4.4'-00T (P.P'-DOTJ 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DOE) 4,4'-000 (P,P'-000) ENDRIN ENOOSULFAN II (BETA) ENOOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••FOOTNOTES•••
/1
3. 1UJ 3. lUJ 3. 1 UJ 3. lUJ 12UJ
0.62UJ 0.31UJ
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLOROENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCIILOROANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIOE) METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
12
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE 15 KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U--MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMEO BV GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE 15 REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57219 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-003-0FS ORGANIC FREE SYSTEM BLANK
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1215 STOP: 00/00/00
05/D7/91
• • • • •• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUII QUANTITATION LIMIT.
;;;;a liiiiiiil liilliil lliii iiiii
METALS DATA REPORT
iiiii iiil --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
-

-
---

-
05/01/91
••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• •• •• •• • •
PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57219 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
STATION ID: NH-003-0FS ORGANIC FREE SYSTEM BLANK
PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY: WILMINGTON
COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC
04/09/91 1215 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2.0U 6.0U NA 2.0U 1.0U 1.0U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0U 4.0U 8.0U 6.0U 8.0U 5.0U 2.0U IOU 7.0 20U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0U NA 0.2U 40U 2.0U
SILVER ARSENIC
BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM
COPPER MOLYBDENUM
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM
TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM
VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
0. IOU 0.020U 0.010U
0.20U 0.40U
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N--PRESUIIPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57219 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• STATION ID: NH-003-0FS ORGANIC FREE SYSTEM BLANK COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1215 STOP: 00/00/00 ••
04/19/91
• • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU sou 12U 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 12U 5.OU 5.OU sou 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1, 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.OU 12U 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 12U 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU 5.OU
CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1 ,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1,1 ,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE O-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
------------------
liill liiiii liiiii liiil liiiii liliil -
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
-----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
----
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57219 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN
•• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
•• STATION ID: NH-003-0FS ORGANIC FREE SYSTEM BLANK COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1215 STOP: 00/00/00
••
--
05/07/91
• •••••• •• •• •• • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0. 10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U
1. SU
1. SU
1. SU
1.SU
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANEJ
DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN 4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDT)
4.4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE)
4.4'-DDD (P.P'-DDDJ
ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
1.SU 1. SU
1.SU
1. SU 10U
o.sou 0.25U
PCB-1232 CAROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1248 CAROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 10161
TOXAPHENE
CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2
BETA CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TRANS-NONACHLOR /2
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
CIS-NONACHLOR /2
OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDEJ /2
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINI-OUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . •· ..................... .
PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57219 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-003-0FS ORGANIC FREE SYSTEM BLANK
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1215 STOP: 00/00/00
04/23/91
• •••••• •• •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU 10U 10U IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 20U IOU IOU IOU IOU 20U IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 20U IOU IOU IOU
lOU IOU
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
I .2.4-TRICHLOROBEN2ENE 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-N IT ROAN I LI NE 2-NITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-N ITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTHRACENE BENZO(AJANTHRACENE BENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU
IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU IOU 10U lOU lOU 20U lOU lOU lOU
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BISC2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE DIBENZOCA.H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1 .2.3-CD) PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE NITROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PVRENE
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
== iiiii
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REP.ORT
iiiil liiii -
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
- --- - -
05/D7/91
••• •• •• •• ••
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• •• •• •• • •
PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57217 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC STATION ID: NH-002-DTB DRILL RIG WATER TANK BLANK COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1205 STOP: 00/00/00
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. METALS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57217 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-002-DTB DRILL RIG WATER TANK BLANK
••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1205 STOP: 00/00/00
05/01/91
• •••••• •• •• • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2.0U 6.0U NA 23 1. OU 1.0U 2.0U 2.0U 9.7 2.0U 4.0U 8.0U 6.0U 8.0U 5.0U 51 10U 9.9 20U 2.0U 2.0U 41 NA 0.2U 220 14
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM ZINC ZIRCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
17 1. 8 0.45 6.5 1.8
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO Bf GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
--
lllilil lilliiil liiiiiill liliil liiiii iiiiil iiii iiliiil - - - - - --
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57217 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-002-DTB DRILL RIG WATER TANK BLANK
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/09/91 1205 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 50U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 50U 5.0U 49J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 6.0
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROIDolETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENEC1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENECTRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U .55J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U · 5.0U
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-I ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1.1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 ,3-0ICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 ,1,1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-ANO/OR P-JXYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-0ICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
04/19/91
••••••• •• •• • • • • • ••••••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
-
PESTICIOES/PCB'S DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57217 •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION IO: NH-002-DTB DRILL RIG WATER ••
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••••••••• SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC TANK BLANK COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1205 STOP: 00/00/00
05/07/91
• • • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0. 10U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 1.SU 1.5U 1. SU
1. SU
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIOE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINOANE) DELTA-BHC ENOOSULFAN I (ALPHA! DIELDRJN 4.4'-DOT (P,P'-OOT) 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-ODE) 4,4'-DDD <P.P'-DDD) ENDRJN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••REMARKS•••
1. SU 1. SU
1. SU 1. SU lOU
0.50U 0.25U
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CJS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCHLORDANE COCTACHLOREPOXIDEJ /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •MAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS -TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-..ATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-11111 11111 -liiil liiil -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
- --- - -
04/23/91
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••• •• •• •• •• •••
PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57217 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-002-DTB DRILL RIG WATER TANK BLANK
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
4JN BENZOTHIAZOLE 40JN TRl(BUTOXYETHANOL)PHOSPHATE
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN •• CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC •• COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1205 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. 04/23/91 EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
-
••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-002-DTB CRILL ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 57217 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
RIG WATER TANK BLANK
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1205 STOP: 00/00/00
••••••• .. •• .. .. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 20U 10U 10U 10U 10U 20U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 20U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U
(3-AND/OR 4-JMETHYLPHENOL 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2.3.4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2.4.S-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-D!METHYLPHENOL 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 2.6-0!NITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL 2--METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2--METHYLPHENOL 2-N IT ROAN I LI NE 2-NITROPHENOL 3,3'-0!CHLOROBENZIDINE 3-NITROANILINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROAN I LI NE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE 4-N ITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTHRACENE BENZO(AJANTHRACENE BENZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 20U 10U 10U 10U
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE BENZO-A-PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE CHRYSENE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE D!BENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE DIBENZOFURAN DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE fLUORANTHENE FLUORENE HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCPJ HEXACHLOROETHANE INDENO (1 .2.3-CDJ PYRENE ISOPHORONE N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE N-NITROSOD!PHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NAPHTHALENE N !TROBENZENE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE PHENOL PYRENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANT!TATION LIMIT.
------------------
---liiii1I lliliiill liiiiil - - - --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REP.ORT ••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57216 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-001-WTB WATER BUFFALO TANK BLANK
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSf COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
05/07/91
• • • • ••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 4U UG/L CYANIDE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERfERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
l!!!!l!I
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57216 SAMPLE TYPE: •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION IO: NH-001-WTB WATER BUFFALO TANK BLANK ••
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
05/01/91
• ••••• •• •• ••
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
• •
2.0U 6.0U NA 24 1.0U 1.0U 2.0U 2.0U 49 2.0U 4.0U 8.0U 6.0U 8.0U 5.0U
50 IOU 11 20U 2.0U 2.0U 12 NA 0.2U
220 7 .o
SILVER ARSENIC BORON BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM COBALT CHROMIUM COPPER MOLYBDENUM NICKEL LEAD ANTIMONY SELENIUM TIN STRONTIUM TELLURIUM TITANIUM THALLIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM 21NC 21RCONIUM MERCURY ALUMINUM MANGANESE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
16
1. 8
0. 17 7.0
1. 8
CALCIUM MAGNESIUM IRON SODIUM POTASSIUM
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALY2ED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIIIATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIYE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-IIATERIAL WAS ANALY2EO FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
- - -
-liliiilll 111111 -iili 1111 ---- --- - -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••••••• ••••••••••••••••• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-571 SAMPLE NO. 57020 SAMPLE TYPE: POTABLE WA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-001 WTB WATER BUFFALO BLANK
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/09/91 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
04/11/91
• • • • • •• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U sou 5.0U 75J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 1.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
9. 1
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1 .1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 0.92J 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1.3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 ,1,1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-JXYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1.1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
-
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. .............. ~ .................... .
•• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57216 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT •• STATION ID: NH-001-WTB WATER BUFFALO TANK BLANK ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROO ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
05/07/91
••••••• •• •• •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
• •
0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.10U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.25U 0.2SU 1.5U
1. 5U
1. SU 1. 5U
ALDRIN HEPTACHLOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE ALPHA-BHC BETA-BHC GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) DELTA-BHC ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) DIELDRIN 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 4.4'-DDE CP.P'-DDE) 4.4'-DDD (P,P'-DDDJ ENDRIN ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) ENDOSULFAN SULFATE CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
1.5U
1. 5U 1. 5U
1. 5U 10U
o.sou 0.25U
PCB-1232 CAROCLOR 1232) PCB-1248 CAROCLOR 1248) PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) TOXAPHENE CHLORDENE 62 ALPHA-CHLOR ENE /2 BETA CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDENE /2 GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIDE) /2 METHOXYCHLOR ENDRIN KETONE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. C-CONFIRMED BY GC/MS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED. SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-iill1 liiii iiiiil -llii --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
-

-
-

-
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57216 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA
SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT
STATION ID: NH-001-WTB WATER BUFFALO TANK BLANK
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN
CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 04/09/91 1130 STOP: 00/00/00
-

-
04/23/91
• • • • • •• •• •• • • • •
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
20JN TRJ(BUTOXYETHANOLJPHOSPHATE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57216 SAMPLE TYPE; BLKWA SOURCE; NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID, NH-001-WTB WATER BUFFALO TANK BLANK
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM; SSF COLLECTED BY; F SLOAN CITY; WILMINGTON ST; NC COLLECTION START; 04/09/91 1130 STOP, 00/00/00
04/23/91
• ••••• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
IOU IOU IOU !OU !OU IOU IOU IOU 2ou !OU IOU IOU !OU 2OU IOU IOU IOU !OU !OU IOU IOU 1OU 1ou 1OU !OU 2OU IOU 1OU 1OU
10U IOU
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 2.4-DINJTROTOLUENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-CHLOROPHENOL 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2-N ITROAN I LI NE 2-N ITROPHENOL 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 3-N IT ROAN I LI NE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 4-CHLOROANILINE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-N IT ROAN I LI NE 4-NITROPHENOL ACENAPHTHENE ACENAPHTHYLENE ANTHRACENE BENZO{A)ANTHRACENE BENZO{B ANO/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
•••REMARKS•••
IOU BENZO{GHl)PERYLENE 1OU BENZO-A-PYRENE IOU BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE IOU BIS{2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE IOU BIS{2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER IOU BIS{2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE CARBAZOLE IOU CHRYSENE IOU DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE 1OU DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE IOU DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE IOU DIBENZOFURAN IOU DIETHYL PHTHALATE 1OU DIMETHYL PHTHALATE IOU FLUORANTHENE IOU FLUORENE IOU HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) IOU HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE IOU HEXACHLOROCVCLOPENTADIENE {HCCP) IOU HEXACHLOROETHANE IOU INDENO (1.2,3-CD) PYRENE IOU ISOPHORONE IOU N-NITROSODI-N-PROPVLAMINE IOU N-N!TROSODIPHENVLAMINE/D!PHENVLAMINE IOU NAPHTHALENE 1OU NITROBENZENE 2OU PENTACHLOROPHENOL 1OU PHENANTHRENE IOU PHENOL
1 OU PYRE NE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
------------------
--11111 -liiliil -- - - --
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• •• ••
••••••••••••••••••••• PROJECT NO. 91-641 SAMPLE NO. 58177 SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-OTB-FB
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 05/07/91 0940 STOP: 00/00/00
05/17/91
• • • • • •• •• •• • • .. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U sou . 5.0U
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 1.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1,1-0ICHLOROETHENE(1.1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
2, 2-DI Cl ILOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1 .1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1 .1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1,2-0ICHLOROPROPANE OIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1 .3-0ICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-0ICHLOROPROPENE 1.1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1,1 ,1 .2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-ANO/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 .3-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO Bf GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
l!!!!!!!!!I
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . . • .................... . PROJECT NO. 91-617 SAMPLE NO. 57270 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-002-TB
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 04/17/91 · 1230 STOP: 00/00/00
04/25/91
• • • • • •• •• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U sou 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U sou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U I.OU 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1. 1-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS-I .2-DICHLOROETHENE 1. 1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2.2 D!CflLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 12U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U s.ou
CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-0ICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1 .1 .1.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-)XYLENE O·XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM
BROMOBENZENE 1 .1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1.2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1.3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1.4-0ICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DJCHLOROBENZENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT.
---

-
-------------
.. iiiiiil lilll -- - ------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
••• •• •• ••
. . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-572 SAMPLE NO. 57215 SAMPLE TYPE: BLKWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER BURN PIT STATION ID: NH-001-TB TRIP BLANK
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 04/12/91 1645 STOP: 00/00/00
04/19/91
• • • • ••• •• •• •• •• • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
5.0U s.ou 5.0U s.ou s.ou s.ou sou 12U s.ou s.ou s.ou 12U s.ou 5.0U sou s.ou 5.0U s.ou s.ou s.ou s.ou 5.0U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U s.ou
CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-0ICHLOROETHYLENE) ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE METHYLENE CHLORIDE . TRANS-1.2-0ICHLOROETHENE 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE VINYL ACETATE CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 1, 1-0ICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE OIBROMOMETHANE BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
s.ou 12U s.ou s.ou 5.0U 5.0U s.ou 12U s.ou 5.0U 5.0U s.ou s.ou s.ou s.ou s.ou s.ou 5.0U 5.0U s.ou s.ou 5.0U 5.0U 5.0U
CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE TRANS-1.3-0ICHLOROPROPENE 1, 1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROBENZENE 1,1,1 ,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ETHYL BENZENE CM-ANO/OR P-)XYLENE 0-XYLENE STYRENE BROMOFORM BROMOBENZENE 1,1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,2.3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0-CHLOROTOLUENE P-CHLOROTOLUENE 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-0ICHLOROBENZENE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATEO VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
-
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 55133 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY •• STATION ID: TB •• CASE.NO.: 15502 SAS NO.: ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: f SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/13/91 1530 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: Z140 MD NO:
03/04/91
• • • ••• .. .. •• •• .. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
30JN TRIMETHOXYBOROXIN
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- --l!!!!!!I lil!l!!I .. i.il ---· ..
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE ANO ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
••• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 55133 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY STATION IO: TB
•• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: WILMINGTON COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: 2140
COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN ST: NC 12/13/91 1530 STOP: 00/00/00
03/04/91
• • • • • •• •• •• •• • • •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANAL YT !CAL RE SUL TS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
NA PHENOL NA BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER NA 2-CHLOROPHENOL NA 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE NA 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE NA 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE NA 2-METHYLPHENOL NA 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER NA (3-ANO/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL NA N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE NA HEXACHLOROETHANE NA NITROBENZENE NA l50PIIORONE NA 2-NITROPHENOL NA 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL NA BISC2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE NA 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL NA 1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NA NAPHTHALENE NA 4-CHLOROANILINE NA HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE NA 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL NA 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE NA HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) NA 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL NA 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL NA 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE NA 2·-NITROANILINE NA DIMETHYL PHTHALATE NA ACENAPHTHYLENE NA 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
NA 3-NITROANILINE NA ACENAPHTHENE NA 2,4-DINITROPHENOL NA 4-NITROPHENOL NA DIBENZOFURAN NA 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE NA DIETHYL PHTHALATE NA 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER NA FLUORENE NA 4-NITROANILINE NA 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL NA N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE NA 4-BROMOPIIENYL PHENYL ETIIER NA HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) NA PENTACHLOROPHENOL NA PHENANTHRENE NA ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE NA DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE NA FLUORANTHENE NA PYRENE NA BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE NA 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE NA BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE NA CHRYSENE NA BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE NA DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE NA BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE NA BENZO-A-PYRENE NA INDENO (1.2,3-CD) PYRENE NA DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE NA BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA.
••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 91-184 SAMPLE NO. 55133 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: NEW HANOVER COUNTY STATION ID: TB •• •• CASE NO.: 15502 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: F SLOAN CITY: WILMINGTON ST: NC COLLECTION START: 12/13/91 1530 STOP: 00/00/00
03/04/91
• • • ••• •• •• • • •• ••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RE SUL TS
D. NO.: 1140 ••
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U lOU lOU lOU
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE METIIYL ETHYL KETONE 1 ,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
lOU lOU lOU
10U lOU lOU lOU 10U lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1.1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--liiililiil 1211!1 !!!Bl l!!!!!!I - - -- - - -
llllllllli