NCD980840409_20001004_Charles Macon Lagoon Drum_FRBCERCLA SAP QAPP_Final Soil Assessment Report Former Lagoon 7-OCR

•
October 4, 2000
Mr. David Mattison
NC Division of Waste Management -Superfund Division
401 Oberlin Road -Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
RE: Final Soil Assessment Report -Former Lagoon 7
Macon/Dockery NPL Site
Cordova, North Carolina
AES Project No. 190-00001-01
Dear Mr. Mattison;
•
RECEIVED
OCT 05 2000
SUPERFUND SECTIO~r
On October 3, 2000, Applied Earth Sciences, Inc. (AES), on behalf of the Macon Dockery Site Group
(MDSG), distributed the Jina\ version of the Soil Assessment Report that detailed the collection of
confirmation soil samples at Lagoon 7 of the Macon Dockery site. The cover page of the Final Soil
Assessment Report was submitted in error. Please discard the cover page attached to the Final Soil
Assessment Report and replace it with the cover page attached to this letter. AES apologizes for any
inconveniences that this error may have caused.
Sincerely;
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC.
Project Geologist
814 Davidson Rood• Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: (704} 795-7076
•
Macon/Dockery Site
Richmond County, North Carolina
October 4, 2000
Ms. Giezelle S. Bennett
Remedial Project Manager
United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Region 4
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104
Re: Final Soil Assessment Report -Former Lagoon 7
Macon/Dockery NPL Site
Cordova, North Carolina; AES Project No. 190-00001-0 I
Dear Ms. Bennett:
•
Reply to: Technical Committee
c/o David L. Jones
Ingersoll-Rand Company
114 Spencer Road
Cassopolis, Michigan
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] I I
On behalf of the Macon Dockery Site Group (MDSG), Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
(AES) is pleased to submit the attached Final Soil Assessment Report (SAR) detailing the
collection of confirmation soil samples at Lagoon 7 of the Macon Dockery Superfund site in
Cordova, North Carolina. The associated fieldwork and SAR has been prepared in accordance
with the Sampling and Analysis Plan dated May 12, 2000.
The MDSG appreciates your assistance on this matter. Should you have any questions.
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Respectfully Submitted,
1-~-~=,
David L. Jones
Project Coordinator
cc: Macon/Dockery Site Group Members
Mr. Mike Profit, COM Federal Program
David Mattison, NC Super Fund Section
,,-•
Macon/Dockery Site
Richmond County, North Carolina
October 3, 2000
Ms. Giezelle S. Bennett
Remedial Project Manager
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4
61 Forsyth Street, S. W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3 IO~
.ECEIVF!J
OCT 042000
SUPERFUND SECTIOf\1
Reply to: Technical Committee
c/o David L. Jones
Ingersoll-Rand Company
I I 4 Spencer Road
Cassopolis, Michigan
Phone: [phone] I
Fax: [phone] I 1
Re: Transmittal of Revised Sampling and Analysis Plan; Lagoon 7
Macon/Dockery NPL Site
Cordova, North Carolina; AES Project No. 190-00001-01
Dear Ms. Bennett:
On behalf of the Macon Dockery Site Group (MDSG), Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
(AES) is pleased to submit the attached Revised Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for the
collection of confirmation soil samples at Lagoon 7 of the Macon Dockery Superfund site in
Cordova, North Carolina. The SAP follows sample location and analytical specifications
contained in Section 3.1.6 of the Performance Standards Verification Plan (PSVP) and
incorporates the comments provided in the March 23, 2000 letter from Giezelle Bennett of the
United States Environmental Protection Agency Region IV Office.
The MDSG appreciates your assistance on this matter. Should you have any questions
please do not hesitate to contact me.
Respectfully Submitted,
z 71-cf!=~:
/;avid L. Jones
Project Coordinator
cc: Macon/Dockery Site Group Members
Mr. Mike Profit, COM Federal Program
David Mattison, NC Super Fund Section
•
MACON DOCKERY SITE
RICHMOND COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
•
FINAL SOIL ASSESSMENT REPORT
A REPORT PREPARED FOR:
THE MACON DOCKERY SITE GROUP
October 4, 2000
BY:
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC.
814 DAVIDSON DRIVE
CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
• •
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction .................................................................... .
1.1 Background ........................................................... .
Purpose .......................................................................... .
Soil Vapor Extraction System ............................................... .
Sample Collection Procedure ................................................ .
Decontamination/Health and Safety Procedures ........................ .
Sample Analysis /Laboratory Analytical Results ........................ .
Disposal of Drummed Materials ............................................ .
Discussion ...................................................................... .
8.1 Summary of Acetone Concentrations .............................. .
8.2 Summary of Photoionization Detector Readings ................. .
Conclusions/Recommendations ............................................ .
List of Figures
Figure I
Figure 2
Figure 3
List of Tables
Table I
Table 2
Table 3
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Site Location Map
Soil Vapor Extraction System Location Map
Soil Boring Location Map
Ground Water Remediation Performance Standards
Air Quality Summary -Soil Vapor Extraction System
Summary of Photoionization Detector Readings
Soil Boring Logs
Field Notes
Laboratory Analytical Results
US EPA lsopropyl Alcohol/ Acetone Newsletter
Page No.
I
I
4
4
5
7
8
9
10
10
1 I
I I
• •
1.0 Introduction
The Macon/Dockery Site is located approximately 1.6 miles southwest of Cordova, North
Carolina in Richmond County, North Carolina. The site is bounded to the east by state road (SR)
1103 and to the north, west, and south by woods and farmland. The site is officially described as
comprising a 16-acre tract owned by relatives and heirs of Charles Macon, and a one-acre tract
owned by John Dockery. The Dockery property is located approximately 2,600 feet north of the
Macon property and is non-contiguous with it. The Macon property is approximately 60 percent
wooded while the Dockery property is almost entirely wooded. Current land use in the vicinity
of the site is primarily agricultural with limited residential use along SRI 103. Figure 1 is a site
location map that shows the locations of the Macon and Dockery properties.
1.1 Background
Prior to the mid-1970s, the Macon property was maintained as undeveloped woodlands
and pasture. From the late 1970s until 1980, Charles Macon operated a waste disposal and oil
recycling business on the Macon property. Materials such as antifreeze, used waste oil, metals,
paint, solvent wastes, waste acid, and bases were handled and stored on site. During operation of
the facility, some of the materials were disposed in unlined lagoons and leaking drums, resulting
in the release of hazardous substances including polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals, and
solvents. C&M Oil Distributors leased and operated the oil recycling facility on the Macon
property from 1981 to 1982. During the time that he operated the Macon property as an oil
recycling facility, Charles Macon also utilized the Dockery property for conducting certain
· portions of his business.
On November 11, 1983, EPA initiated a removal action on the Macon Property.
Removal operations on the Dockery Property began on January 9, 1984. Removal activities at
both properties were completed on January 17, 1984. During the course of the removal action,
EPA removed contaminated soils and materials (including over 2,000 drums of hazardous
substances) from the entire site. Some hazardous substances were contained on-site until the
initiation of remedial action.
Page No. 1
'
•
In 1985, EPA conducted a geological and sampling investigation at the Site. The
investigation detected the presence of hazardous substances in groundwater and soil. In January
1987, the Site was proposed for inclusion on the National Priorities List (NPL), and in July 1987,
pursuant to Section I 05 of CERCLA, EPA placed the Site on the NPL. As a result of the
proposed inclusion of the Site on the NPL, Sirrine Environmental Consultants initiated a
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) for the site on April 13, 1988. The Remedial
Investigation (RI) Report was completed in February I 991, and the Feasibility Study (FS) Report
was completed in July I 991.
Based on the findings of the RI, Performance Standards were established for 26
substances. The groundwater Remediation Performance Standards are attached as Table 1.
Sampling in all media confirmed that groundwater beneath and hydraulically downgradient of
the source areas and soil in two former lagoons contained substances above the Performance
Standards. Groundwater was found to be moving in a northwesterly direction.
On September 30, 1991, US EPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Macon/Dockery Site. The ROD was reissued on April 12, 1992. The ROD set forth the US
EPA's rationale and the remedy selected to address remaining vessels, and affected soils and
groundwater identified at the site. US EPA issued a Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO) and
Statement of Work for Remedial Design and Remedial Action. The effective date of the UAO
was June 30, 1992. The Statement of Work (SOW) lists the requirements for implementing the
remedy as described in the ROD and for achieving Performance Standards set forth in the ROD.
US EPA specified the following remedial actions and work elements for the Macon/Dockery
Site:
Groundwater Control: Groundwater with concentrations of constituents of concern
greater than the Performance Standards specified in the SOW must be extracted, treated on-site
via air stripping, and discharged to an infiltration gallery.
Page No. 2
• •
Source Control: Contaminated soils at Lagoon 7 and Lagoon IO and related
materials must be addressed. Vadose Zone soils underlying Lagoon 7 must be treated via soil
vapor extraction (SVE) to remove tetrachloroethene (PCE) to levels below the Performance
Standard of 3 parts per million (ppm). The ROD and SOW required that a bioremediation
treatability evaluation of waste materials from lagoon IO be performed using indigenous
microbial populations to degrade carcinogenic poly nuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)
compounds to a Performance Standard of 2 ppm total PAHs. The treatability study for
bioremediation of Lagoon IO waste was conducted and a report was included in the Preliminary
Design Report. Based on treatability study results and additional information regarding the
nature of the waste obtained from a resampling effort, the US EPA amended the ROD in March
1994 to provide for excavation and off-site disposal of Lagoon 10 materials.
Vessel Removal: Hazardous materials remaining in tanks and vats at the site were
transported to an appropriate off-site facility for proper disposal. Non-hazardous vessel contents
were recycled or transported off-site for proper disposal. The vessels were recycled or
decommissioned. If evidence of leakage was noted after the vessels are removed, the remedial
action also included cleanup of affected surficial soils.
A Final Remedial Design Report for SVE operations was submitted on June 14, 1994.
The groundwater remedy design was separated from the SVE design to allow the Macon
Dockery Site Group (MDSG) to conduct studies of the applicability ofbioremediating volatile
organic constituents on source area groundwater. Currently, one SVE system and four
groundwater pump and treat systems are in operation at the site.
The MDSG undertook the waste removal phase of the Remedial Action beginning in June
1994. The waste removal phase included removal of Lagoon IO wastes, various process and
storage vessels associated with previous operations, and wastes generated during previous
investigation activities. Waste removal activities were completed in November 1994.
Page No. 3
• •
2.0 Purpose
The purpose of this Soil Assessment Report (SAR) is to document soil conditions in the
area of former Lagoon 7 of the Macon Dockery Superfund site. The SAR provides descriptions
and details of the procedures conducted for soil verification sampling at former Lagoon 7. All
fieldwork and reporting activities were conducted in accordance with the Sampling and Analysis
Plan (SAP) dated May 12, 2000.
Since the installation of the SVE unit at Lagoon 7, SVE exhaust and extraction well point
air samples have been collected on a quarterly and semi-annual basis respectively. A review of
recent and historical air sample data from samples collected in relation to the SVE system have
consistently been below the air emissions Performance Standards established for the site. The
following SAR provides details and descriptions of the activities conducted for assessing the
subsurface soils in the area of former Lagoon 7. The goal of the soil assessment in the area of
former Lagoon 7 was to determine if SVE operations have reduced COC concentrations to below
the Performance Standards for the site.
3.0 Soil Vapor Extraction System
The SVE system installed in the area of former Lagoon 7 was installed to remediate
vadose zone soils beneath the former lagoon. The SVE system consists of a series of SVE wells
used for vacuum extraction and soil venting. Remediation at Lagoon 7 initiated on February 22,
1996, by SVE. Since system start-up, the system has operated a large vacuum unit that induces
vacuum on SVE wells VE-I, OW-I, OW-3, and OW-5 to recover soil vapors. Vapors captured
by the SVE system are discharged to the atmosphere through a vertical discharge stack. Ambient
air enters the vadose zone through the ground surface and through two soil venting wells (OW-2
and OW-4). Figure 2 details the layout of the SVE system and associated SVE wells.
The SVE system has extracted vapors from wells VE-I, OW-I, OW-3, and OW-5 since
start-up. Air samples have been collected from extraction well points and the exhaust side of the
Page No. 4
• •
SVE system on a quarterly, and semi-annual basis, respectively. Air samples collected in
association with the SVE system are analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 18. A review of the
historical SVE system effluent results indicates that air samples collected from the individual
SVE points and the SVE exhaust stack have been below the laboratory detection limits for
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) since November 1997. In a letter dated January 12, 2000,
the USEPA Region IV requested that the MDSG prepare a SAP for soil sampling in the area of
former Lagoon 7. The SAP provided descriptions and details of the proposed procedures for soil
verification sampling and subsequent regulatory reporting. A summary of the analytical results
associated with the SVE system are attached as Table 2.
4.0 Sample Collection Procedure
On June 13, 2000, AES mobilized to the Macon Dockery site to observe Geotek Drilling
Company, Inc. (Geotek) install the confirmation soil borings. Mr. Dave Mattison of the
NCDENR Superfund Section and Mr. Kenny Gulledge of the MDSG were also present during
the soil confirmation sampling event. As detailed in Section 3.1.8 of the Performance Standards
Verification Plan (PSVP) dated July 11, 1994 and in the SAP, AES collected soil samples from
four soil borings advanced within the perimeter of former Lagoon 7. Per the SAP, the proposed
soil boring locations were to be placed on two perpendicular axes of Lagoon 7. The soil borings
located on the east/west axis were proposed to be located approximately 10 feet on either side of
the lagoon center and soil borings located on the north/south axis were proposed to be located
approximately 20 feet on either side of the lagoon center. However, concrete was encountered
approximately two to three feet below grade level at three of the proposed boring locations and
the locations of the borings were slightly modified. Due to the drill rig encountering concrete,
soil boring CSB-2, located on the southern portion of the north/south axis, was moved
approximately three feet to the west. Additionally, soil borings CSB-3 and CSB-4, located on
the east/west axis, were moved approximately three feet to the southwest and two feet to the
southwest, respectively, from the proposed locations. Figure 3 shows the locations of the
confirmation soil borings.
Page No. 5
• •
The soil borings were advanced using continuous flight hollow stem augers. Undisturbed
soil samples were collected in split spoon samplers advanced through the augers. The soil
borings were advanced to a total depth of 32 feet below grade level (BGL).
All drilling and sampling activities were conducted under the direction of a professional
engineer registered in the state of North Carolina. Undisturbed soil samples were collected using
a stainless steel split spoon sampler advanced in two-foot intervals through the augers. The split
spoon sampler retrieved soil samples from the following depth intervals below grade: I 0-12 feet;
15-17 feet; 20-22 feet; 22-24 feet; 24-26 feet; 26-28 feet; 28-30 feet; and, 30-32 feet.
A Ii tho logic description of soil cuttings retrieved from the augers and soil recovered in
the split spoon samplers was recorded in the field. In addition, soil cuttings and soil recovered in
the split spoon samplers were field screened by headspace analysis. The collected soil samples
were placed into plastic air-tight bags and screened with an organic vapor analyzer equipped with
a photoionization detector (PIO). Appendix A contains the boring logs prepared during the
installation of the soil confirmation borings. Copies of the field notes prepared during the
investigation are contained in Appendix 8. A summary of the PIO results is attached to this
report as Table 3.
Soil samples collected for laboratory analysis were collected from the split spoons
advanced at the 22 to 24-foot interval and the 28 to 30-foot interval. In addition, one soil sample
was collected for laboratory analysis from the interval exhibiting the highest PIO reading. As
stated in the SAP, if there were no PIO readings above the detection limit, or the highest reading
occurred in the 22 to 24-foot or 28 to 30-foot depth intervals, only two (2) samples would be
collected from the boring for laboratory analysis. This protocol resulted in two (2) soil samples
collected from each boring and one (I) additional sample collected from the 15 to 17 feet interval
of confirmation soil boring CSB-4. All drilling and sampling activities were conducted in
accordance with the PSVP for the Macon/Dockery Site and the US EPA Region IV
Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual.
Page No. 6
• •
Drilling equipment was decontaminated according to the procedures outlined in Section
5.0 of this report. Decontamination procedures occurred before drilling activities commenced
and between each boring. Decontamination procedures occurred in the designated
decontamination area which was field constructed near the entrance of the Macon site. The
downhole equipment was not allowed to come into contact with potentially contaminated
materials until boring operations commenced.
Following completion of each boring, the borings were abandoned with a
water/cement/bentonite mixture with a ratio of approximately 3 :6: I. Soil cuttings generated by
the installation of the borings were placed into 55-gallon drums and stored on-site.
5.0 Decontamination/Health and Safety Procedures
Large drilling apparatus including drill augers, bits, and the back of the drill rig, were
steam cleaned prior to beginning boring operations and again in between each boring. Soil
sampling equipment, including split spoon samplers, were decontaminated before sampling and
between the collection of each sample. Soil sampling equipment was decontaminated in
accordance with the US EPA's Region IV Environmental Investigations Standard Operating
Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual and Section I 1.0 of the Site Health and Safety Plan
for the Macon/Dockery Site. Soil sampling equipment was decontaminated using the seven-step
decontamination procedure listed below.
I. Scrub brushed using clean tap water and laboratory detergent.
2. Tap water rinse.
3. Deionized organic-free water rinse.
4. Isopropanol rinse.
5. Deionized organic-free water rinse.
6. Air dry
7. Equipment was wrapped with aluminum foil to minimize the possibility of
Page No. 7
• •
contamination.
Decontamination procedures were performed on a field erected decontamination pad
designed to collect all liquid and particulate matter resulting from such procedures. The
decontamination pad was constructed on-site near the entrance to the Macon Source Area
groundwater pump and treat system. The decontamination pad was 12-foot by 12-foot in size
and constructed of 6 mil (0.006) thick plastic inside of four inch by four inch rails. All
decontamination procedures were conducted on the decontamination pad. The decontamination
pad plastic, liquid, and particulate matter accumulated from the decontamination procedures was
placed into 55-gallon drums and stored on-site.
All drilling and sampling activities that occurred at the site were conducted in accordance
with the Site Health and Safety Plan prepared for the Macon/Dockery Site by Handex of the
Carolinas dated June 1995. Drilling and sampling personnel were equipped with Level D
personal protective equipment including latex gloves, hard hats, steel toed safety boots, and
safety glasses. Disposable personal protective gear was placed into 55-gallon drums and stored
on-site.
6.0 Sample Analysis/Laboratory Analytical Results
Each soil sample collected for laboratory analysis was placed into two four ounce glass
sample jars equipped with a Teflon lid and two Encor soil sampling devices. For the purposes of
the soil confirmation sampling, the chain-of-custody procedures outlined in Section 4-1 of
RMT's Field Sampling and Analysis Plan dated June 1994 were followed. By the use of chain-
of-custody procedures, the handling of samples is traceable from the time of sample collection to
the time of final disposition. Field personnel recorded the sample number, date and time of
sample collection, personnel involved, type of sample, type of analysis to be performed, type of
containers filled, volume of sample collected, and preservatives used. Field measurements such
as sample depth, location, and PIO reading were recorded in the sample personnel's field notes.
Page No. 8
• •
Soil samples collected for analysis were placed into a cooler pre-packed with ice. A
temperature blank inside of the pre-packed cooler was used to assure that the samples maintained
a temperature of no greater than 4-degrees Celsius (C). Prior to shipment, the cooler was sealed
with adhesive custody seals to assure that the samples were not disturbed during shipment. Soil
samples were shipped, via overnight delivery, to STL Savannah Laboratories, Inc. (STL), a
North Carolina Certified Laboratory, in Savannah, Georgia. The MDSG requested that the soil
samples be analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260, with a method quantitation limit no
greater than 0.5 mg/kg. STL extracted the soil samples prior to the expiration of the I 4-day hold
time.
During the confirmation soil sampling event, nine soil samples were collected for
laboratory analysis. Per the SAP, a minimum of two soil samples was collected from each
boring. Each soil boring was sampled at the 22 to 24 foot interval and at the 28 to 30 foot
interval. A third soil sample was collected from confirmation soil boring CSB-4 since field
screening indicated that the highest PIO reading occurred at the 15 foot to 1 7 foot interval. A
discussion of field screening PIO results as compared to analytical parameters is contained in
Section 8.2 of this report.
Following the sampling and chain-of-custody procedures detailed above, the soil samples
were delivered to STL. Laboratory analytical results did not indicate the presence of
tetrachloroethene above the laboratory detection limit. In addition, no additional compounds
were detected in excess of the sample detection limits with the exception of acetone in soil
samples CSB-1-22-24 and CSB-2-28-30 at concentrations of I 00 ug/kg and 85 ug/kg,
respectively. Laboratory analytical results are attached to this report as Appendix C.
7.0 Disposal of Drummed Materials
Since laboratory analytical results of the sampled intervals reported that PCE
concentrations were less than the Performance Standard of 3.0 mg/kg the MDSG proposes to
spread the drummed soil cuttings on site during the next quarterly groundwater sampling event in
Page No. 9
• •
November 2000. In addition, the MDSG proposes to dispose of plastic and other disposable
sampling materials in a secure municipal landfill in accordance with Federal, State, and local
regulations. Rinse water collected during decontamination procedures will be slowly combined
with the influent water of the Macon Dockery Source Area groundwater treatment system during
the next quarterly groundwater sampling event in November 2000. The rinse water will be
discharged into the remediation system at a point prior to the sediment filters in order to avoid
potential problems from the presence of naturally occurring metals or from sediment deposition.
8.0 Discussion
The following sections provide conclusions and recommendations based on the data
collected during the subsurface soil investigation conducted at the Macon Dockery Former
Lagoon 7 site.
8.1 Summary of Acetone Concentrations
Laboratory analytical results have reported that PCE concentrations are below the
Performance Standard. Acetone was detected in confirmation soil samples CSB-1-22-24 and
CSB-2-28-30 at concentrations of I 00 ug/kg and 85 ug/kg, respectively. According to Ms.
Angie Weimerskirk, Senior Chemist, of STL Analytical Laboratories, it is possible that the
presence of acetone is due to the result of the "degradation" ofisopropyl alcohol. Jsopropyl
alcohol was used during the soil sampling event as part of the required decontamination
procedures of the stainless steel split spoons and equipment. Ms. Weimerskirk referenced an
article prepared by the USEP A stating that isopropyl alcohol can form low levels of acetone
when exposed to sunlight or heat. Since isopropyl alcohol was used during decontamination
procedures, it is possible that residual amounts of isopropyl alcohol transferred into the soil
samples collected for laboratory analysis. Although limited, the soil samples would have had
some exposure to sunlight and heat during the placement of the soil into the laboratory
containers. A review of the field notes indicates that ambient air temperatures during the soil
sampling event exceeded 90 degrees Farenheit. A copy of the USEPA document has been
attached to this report as Appendix D.
Page No. 10
• •
While it is possible that the acetone results from the soil samples collected from
confirmation soil borings may be due to residual isopropyl alcohol, it is also possible that the
acetone results are representative of subsurface soil conditions at former Lagoon 7. A review of
recent and historical groundwater analytical data indicates that acetone has been detected in
groundwater monitoring well MW-9, the closest monitoring well to the soil confirmation soil
borings. Groundwater monitoring well MW-9 is located topographically and hydraulically
upgradient of the confirmation soil borings. While no Remediation Performance Standard has
been established for acetone in soil, the NCDENR Hazardous Waste Section soil screening level
for acetone is 2.81 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and the Remediation Performance Standard
for acetone in groundwater is 3,500 ug/L. Even if the acetone results indicated in confirmation
soil borings CSB-1 and CSB-2 are representative of subsurface conditions; the acetone results
are minimal and should not prevent the decommissioning of the SVE system.
8.2 Summary of Photo ionization Detector Readings
The PIO is a field screening tool and is not discriminatory or uniformly responsive to all
VOCs. In a telephone conversation with the Technical Support Group ofHnu, the manufacturer
of the PIO used during the soil investigation, it was conveyed that some VOCs respond with a
greater PIO result than do others. The PIO utilized in the field was calibrated with a span gas
that is identical to benzene. The response factors for PCE and TCE are 0.6 and 0.7, respectively.
To find the actual concentration in the sample, the response factor is multiplied by the meter
reading. Additionally, it was stated that PIO results will differ due to different volatilization time
allowed, ambient temperature, moisture content, and amount of soil collected and bagged for
screening. For example, the high ambient air temperatures experienced in the field during
sample screening may have resulted in elevated PIO concentrations measured of the collected
samples.
As stated in the Compendium of Superfund Field Operations Methods, published by the
Page No. 11
• •
EPA, Section 7.6.2.1: " ... a positive instrument response is not conclusive evidence of the
presence of toxic materials, since the detector responds to both toxic and nontoxic organics."
A review of the soil boring logs prepared during the advancement of the confirmation soil
borings indicates field screening results above the PID's detection limit in soil samples collected
from soil borings CSB-2, CSB-3, and CSB-4. PIO results recorded during the advancement of
confirmation soil boring CSB-1 did not indicate the presence of volatile organics above the PIO
detection limit. PIO results from soil confirmation borings CSB-2, CSB-3, and CSB-4 ranged
from I part per million (ppm) to 65 ppm. The elevated PIO readings are the result of cumulative,
low concentrations of volatile organics in the subsurface soil, however, the concentrations of the
individual VOCs were not high enough to exceed the laboratory detection limits for the
parameters tested.
9.0 Conclusions/Recommendations
Laboratory analytical results from the soil samples collected from the four soil
confirmation borings have reported that PCE concentrations are below the Performance Standard
established for the Macon Dockery site. Acetone was detected in confirmation soil borings CSBa
1-22-24 and CSB-2-28-30 at concentrations of 100 ug/kg and 85ug/kg, respectively.
Additionally, field screening activities conducted during the installation of the confirmation soil
borings resulted in elevated PIO readings at three of the four soil boring locations.
It is possible that the acetone concentrations reported for confirmation soil borings CSB-1
and CSB-2 are the result of the use ofisopropyl alcohol that occurred during the field
decontamination of the split spoon samplers. Additionally, it is also possible that the
concentrations of acetone reported in the laboratory analytical data are representative of the
subsurface soil conditions, however, the concentrations of acetone are low and below applicable
regulatory thresholds. The elevated PIO readings collected during the subsurface soil
investigation are the cumulative result of low level concentrations of volatile organics in the
subsurface soil, however, the concentrations of the individual volatile organic parameters, are not
Page No. 12
• •
high enough to exceed the laboratory detection limits.
Based upon the results presented above, the MDSG believes that SVE operations are
complete in the area of Former Lagoon 7. Upon approval by the USEPA and NCDENR
Superfund sections, the MDSG will decommission the SVE system currently in operation at the
site. In addition, the MDSG will abandon the observation and extraction wells associated with
the SVE system. The MDSG will disconnect all electrical wiring to the SVE system and remove
the SVE blower and all associated equipment from the site. The observation and extraction wells
associated with the SVE system will be abandoned with a water/cement/bentonite mixture with a
ratio of approximately 3:6: I. The abandonment mixture will be pumped into the wells via
tremmie pipe. The abandonment mixture will be pumped into the wells such that the entire PVC
well screen and riser are filled to the surface. Following installation of the abandonment
mixture, the well vaults will be removed from the site and the void caused by removal of the well
vaults will be filled with clean backfill.
Page No. 13
• •
TABLES
•
APPENDIX A
Soil Boring Logs
• •
APPENDIXB
Field Notes
• •
APPENDIXC
Laboratory Analytical Results
• •
FIGURES
---·
aia.r•10011.oe
-.a&. 0892
FIGUIIE 1 .
SITE LOCATION MAP
MACON/DOCKERY SITE
SCALE: 1 "•2000'
1 ,,
MACON/DOCl<ERY
RICHMOHOCOUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
. ' •
LEGEND
SOIL VAPOR E:XTRACTION WELL
SOIL VACUUM OBSERVATION WELL
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Macon Dockery Site
Cordova, North Carolina
MAO[ BY: OAT[:
CHKD BY: OAT(:
••
Soil Vapor Extraction
System Location Map 2
• OW·4
• ve:-..1
e0W·5 ... -. • • • • . . .. . • • • • ......
SOIL V />POR E:XTRACTION WE:LL
SOIL VACUUM OBSE:RVATION WE:LL
#'PROXIMATE: LOCATION• OF' LAGOON
' ....... .... ·•. ... ·•. .. · ~ • • • • . . ... · :
/ CSB-1 : ,•· * :
~ .
' OW·5 -• ..... / : . . .
----....... .
/ * VE:·1e
••• .-CSB-3 ;
./· *" !
• ow-1
Boring Locations
/ CSB-4 :
/ CSB-2 :-a-FORMER
j * f LAGOON 7 . . . , .
••••• 1· .... •
•... 0,W·J .••·
•••• • • •• •• •••• •• .... ..• ······--·······
• ow-2
.D -----20
SCALE IN f'tET
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Macon Dockery Site
Cordova, North Carolina Soil Boring-Location Map
MADE BY: DATE:
OHNO IY1
..
• •
TABLES
.. • •
AMT FIELD SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN· GROUND WATER OCTOBE A 1994
MACON/DOCKERY SITE
SECTION 3
TABLE 1
GROUND WATER REMEDIATION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Acetone 3500
Benzene
1
Chloroform
1
1 1-Dichloroethane 3500
1.1-Dichloroethene 7
1.2-Dichloroethene
70
Meth> lene Chloride 5
Tetrachloroethene
1
Toluene
1000
1 1.1-Trichloroethane 200
Trichloroethane
2.8
Vinyl Chloride 1
'-~ Xvlene 400
Antlmonv
60
Barium
1000
Bervllium
1
Cadmium
5
Chromium
50
Lead
15
Mannanese
50
Mercurv
1.1
Nickel
100
Vanadium
50
Zinc
5000
Cvanide
154
lsophorone
70
-l:U'W"~7tl0170W.FSPlcdf'M
-
• • • ii\111111l111\11fBll\lll\l\1i1\1ltlllttl\t !Sample Lo(:•tion VE--01 IOW-1 1ow-J 'OW-5 isvE Exhaust Dale 2/221% 6151% 7/1196 11/8/96 6n.J/97 11/13/97 6/19/98 11/4/98 S/13199 11/3199 2/22/96 6/5/96 7/1/96 I 1/8/96 6/23/97 I I/IJ/97 6/19/98 11/4/98 5/13/99 11/3/99 2/l2/96 6/5/96 7/1/96 I 1/8/96 6(23191 11/13/97 6/19/98 11/4/98 S/13/99 11/3/99 2/l2/96 6/S/% 11/8/96 6123/97 11/13/97 6/19/98 11/4/98 5/13/99 11/3/99 2/14/96 2/15/96 2/16/96 4/3/96 6/5/96 7/1/96 8/1/% 'lJS/97 6/23/97 8/7197 11/13/97 216198 sn19s 8/7198 11/4/98 2/11/99 5/13/99 8/l/99 J I/J/99 n Chloroform mg/ml <IO <10 <10 <10 <IO <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <10 <10 230 <10 <10 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <10 <10 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 <IO <10 <10 <10 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 1,2-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Toluene mg/ml mg/ml m!!lml <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 <IO <10 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2.J <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 80 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 380 <IO <10 <10 <IO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <IO <10 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <10 <IO ,s <10 <10 43 <10 <10 73 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
. ' . • • ,~il,l\litl1llll)lllliill1~~:,),,, f[tlITii®''''ltl If jf ,.,~1~i1 !Sample Location 'SVE Inlet Line Upper Dockery Air Stack Lower Dockery Air Stack Macon Source Air Stack Date 615196 7/1/96 2/16/96 4/3/96 6/S/96 7/1/96 8/1196 11/8/96 2/5/97 5/12197 8f1/97 11/13/97 2/6/98 Sll/98 sn/98 11/4/98 2/11/99 l/13199 8/S/99 11/3/99 4/3/96 8/i/96 11/8196 S/12197 11/13/97 216/98 sn19s 8f1/98 l 1/4/98 2/11/99 5113199 8/S/99 t 1/3/99 2/16196 4/3196 5/3/96 615196 7/1/96 8/1/96 11/8/96 215191 5/12197 sn/97 11/13/97 2/6/98 Sll/98 8f1/98 11/4/98 2/11/99 5/13/99 8/S/99 11/3/99 2/17/00 I Chloroform mi:fmJ " <10 <JO <JO <JO <10 <JO <JO <10 <10 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <JO <10 <10 <JO <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <JO so <10 <10 <10 <JO <JO <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 1,2-Dichlororthcne Trichlorof:lhcne Toluene mg/ml mt/ml mlUmJ <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <10 <JO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <10 <JO <10 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <JO <10 <JO <10 <10 <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <10 <JO <10 <10 <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <JO <10 <JO <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <JO <10 <10 <JO <10 <JO <JO <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> DO/Litz:
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 661(11 I
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 66/,/8
0'1'.> 0'1'.> o·z> O'Z> 661£11'
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 66/llfl
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> o·z> 86/Vtl I
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 86/IJ>
0'1'.> 0'1'.> O'l> o·z> 86/US"
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> B6/9/Z
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> L6/£ill I
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> L6/LJ>
Of> Of> Of> 01> l6/ll/'
Of> 01> Of> Of> L6/t;/Z
01> 01> 01> Of> 96/i/l I
Of> 01> 01> Of> 96/1/B
Of> 01> 01> 01> 96/1/L
01> Of> 01> Of> 96/)/9
Of> Of> 01> Of> 96/(/<
01> 01> Of> 01> 96/(/t
Of> 01> 01> 01> 96/91/Z
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 00/ll/Z
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 66/(/( I
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 66"/B
0'1'.> 0'1'.> O"Z> 0'1'.> 661£1"
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 66/11/l
SN SN SN SN 86/V/l 1
0'1'.> 0'1'.> o·z:> 0'1'.> 86/IJ>
0'1'.> 0'1'.> O'l> O'Z> 86/U'i
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> O'Z> 8619/Z
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> L6/£1/l l
0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> 0'1'.> L6/LJ>
01> 01> Of> 01> UJ/7.IIS"
01> 01> 01> 01> L6/S"/Z
01> Of> Of> Of> 96/8/1 I
01> Of> 01> Of> 96/1/i
Of> 6l 01> 0'8 9611/L
Of> 01> 01> 01> 96/)/9
01> Of> Of> 01> 96/(/)
01> 01> Of> Of> 96/91/Z
[W/3W ["'I•"' rm(.fw (W{,jW uopUO'J
auan10.1 auaq1ao.101q3~J. awqtaoJOfqJ!fi•t'I uuoJOJ0llf:J a11a a1d1.ns
,.\:,\ h~ll\t,~mJt{t~i'¾\i "' , ~'~ ":; ,~n~M ~Uti~~UnJQ P.~~ffl). :::~ f.'~ ~~}:-:>J-.~'~:i:-'::'"~~ww-=-':;~"3(N Pw-:::~'t"~
>:i;?Jft}/fif~lft~11it\t: :~?lll~~,-~fbi~#1@Mij~J~\l4t!Brlitti~zy~~#ii'
< :-:',:,: "> ,' <'1'" > < ,'::: ',~ ''"'.'' ~~,.~ :'.:~,'.~' l:r:""::-:-~~t'"" ,,~,;.):;, $-""t'~':i-'~.:::J,:,.C.-.:,\,{:'.::,,:;..-:-,f-:-f /,,, ~~~\
:;:;,,:,.''':-J':-'~':'.'':i::'.''H;.,\:$."<'f:,~h 1~':!)'~"i,.\f,-::,:,.,<,,':,s,,\, ~~~,:.;\,:~~ .Jnf((\~!Qh: :a1qw:,;t ,_'' ' ' ~\-,,, x\' ,' '' ' ~ ,;:.,' :-;} -❖, " '''' ~ '. ... ,:'~ ~<,
• •
• TABLE 3 • Summary of Photoionization Detector Readings
Soil Confirmation Sampling Event• June 13-15, 2000
Macon Dockery Site
Cordova, North Carolina
Boring Identification No. Depth (feet) PID Result (ppm) Notes
CSB-1 2.0 <1.0
4.0 <1.0
6.0 <1.0
9.0 <1.0
11.0 <1.0
14.0 <1.0
16.0 <1.0
19.0 <1.0
21.0 <1.0
23.0 <1.0 Submitted to lab for analysis
25.0 <1.0
27.0 <1.0
29.0 <1.0 Submitted to lab for analysis
31.0 <1.0
CSB-2 2.0 1.0
6.0 <1.0
11.0 <1.0
14.0 2.0
16.0 3.0
19.0 2.0
21.0 10.0
23.0 65.0 Submitted to lab for analysis
25.0 15.0
27.0 ND 0% sou recovery in split spoon
29.0 5.0 Submitted to lab for analysis
31.0 1.0
CSB-3 2.0 <1.0
4.0 <1.0
5.0 1.5
9.0 <1.0
11.0 <1.0
13.0 <1.0
16.0 <1.0
21.0 5.5
23.0 11.0 Submitted to lab for analysis
25.0 4.0
27.0 3.0
29.0 4.0 Submitted to lab for analysis
31.0 1.5
CSB-4 2.0 <1.0
5.0 19.0
8.0 3.0
11.0 <1.0
14.0 <1.0
17.0 20.0 Submitted to lab for analysis
19.0 9.0
21.0 1.5
23.0 10.0 Submitted to lab for analysis
25.0 9.0
27.0 4.5
29.0 3.0 Submitted to lab for analysis
31.0 <1.0
ppm -parts per million
ND -no data, 0% soil recovery in split spoon
• •
APPENDIX A
Soil Boring Logs
•
Drilling Started: 6-1 J-00
Drilling Completed: 6-15-00
Drilling Method: Geoprobe
Drilling Company: AES
Drilled By: Eric Hetrick
Logged By: Eric Hetrick
Soil Boring: CSB-1
2
4
I
8
12
14
11
18
20
22
24
21
28
JO
J2
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
Lab <1
<1
<1
<1
Lithologic Description
Bed, medium araln t.o On• araJn.cl Nnd wlLb
mnall amcnmLI of 1ra.,.1
Lea molal. nd NDd. na stone
Kolat. dark Nd nne t.o medium 1ralned sand
Red, One 1ralnod Nnd. minor amounle of
allk:a it.one
Orana•, NCI nn• ,,.m aand and clay
minor amount.a of blollLe
Kol.Ued whit.a and orana• uprom.e with
rellcL aU'UGLW"a
Rellr;:1. sLn&ct.ura wilh --•Lh•nd black blolU.e
Mon C:OMOlldaLed
81.rNkH wt.Lb WNLberecl blollt.e
Lea lltnakln&, more olay
lion of &Jw·.aame
~ • Spll~ aample
APPUED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. -CAROLIN MACON OOCKERY SITE
CORDOVA, NORTH CAROLINA
JUNE 1l - 1 ~. 2000 190-00001-01 -... LP, Cheabd a,t [.H,
Dahlr7-25-00
rue: 180-0tBI
2
4
8
8
10
12
14
18
18
20
22
24
28
28
JO
•
Non•
Nono
None
None
Non■
Nono
None
Nono
None
Non•
None
None
SOIL BORING LOG
CSB-1
•
Drilling Started: 6-13-00
Drilling Completed: 6-15-00
Drilling Method: Geoprobe
Drilling Company: AES -Carolinas
Drilled By: Eric Hetrick
Logged By: Eric Hetrick
Soil Boring: CSB-2
2
4'
8.
8 •
10
12 •
14 •
18
18 •
20.
22 •
24 •
28
28
JO
J2
~
1,0
<1.0
<1.0
2.0
J.0
2.0
10.0
Lob
15.0
Lob 5.0
1.0
Lithologic Description
Brown tlll. •Uh aom• aand and
or1anlo ma&.erlal -aal.w-at.ed
Red lllL wi&b IOmti Nnd poorly 1rodtd.
fln• Lo medium. rounded Lo ancular und
SUU •Lura&.ad -parahad ••I.er
Roddlab brown Mild wlLh IIOffl9 .Ut -
poorly 1radod.
nn, lo medlum. rounded Lo anaular MIid
llollL -reooftry •40X
Debria -wood/m•L&I
Raddlab brown Nnd wlLh t.roca ■UL -poorly 1reded flM Lo medium. rounded Lo anaul■r aand
Dr, -acrwened ouutnp
Reddllb brown Nnd wiLh mme tllL
poorly 1raded. fin• Lo medium Lo an,uter Nnd
Malit nooft'7 -oox
Wood7 dobrlo
NaUwe aoll -moLU.cl nd/brown/wblt.e und wiLh
aome ellL
Trace clay -poorly are.dad, fin• lo medium
D17
MotUed rad/brown/•hlt.e slit wlLh aom■ und
Ince clay, Jenee or flelcbpar -poorly araded,
nna lo medium, rounded Lo an,ular undll
D17
o,c ReoowerJ
MoLUed brown/•blt.e llllt wU.b aome und
poorly 1raded, nn, t.o modlwn, ro1o1ndod lo an,:ular
ae.ndll. Rella ■LrucLurn wlLh Reldaper -Nprollt.o
Dry Lo Molal'
Spill oemple
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. -CAROLINAl MACON DOCKERY SITE
CORDOVA, NORTH CAROLINA
JUNE 1l -15, 2000 190-00001-0tl-.,.._,_ 'IChocud O,,E,H,
Dom7-Z,-OO
me:1ao-o1a2
•
Moderate ... Le oU odor
2
4.
Moderat.e peLro/wolaW. odor
8 •
8 •
10 • ModaraLe peLro/wolaUle odor
•
12 •
14 • ModaraY odor
10 •
Moderate odor
18 •
20.
22
24
lloderat.e/aLroa, odor
28 •
28 •
JO. lllld odor
• eor1na 1.erm1naLec1 at aa'.
SOIL BORING LOG
CSB-2
-
•
Drilling Started: 6-13-00
Drilling Completed: 6-15-00
Drilling Method: Geoprobe
Drilling Company: AES -Carolinas
Drilled By: Eric Hetrick
Logged By: Eric Hetrick
Soil Boring: CSB-3 .. .c~ u Q. 'ii a. ~~ E 0 V>
2
4
8
12
14
15
18
20
22
24
25
28
JO
J2
D .3
~ oE -a. Q. a.
~
<1.0
(1,0
<1.0
Lithologic Description
Dark red/brown Nnd wll.h IIOffle alll.
anaular t.o nnmded ..nd, mNlt.1m lo fin• ar•lned
moln
Dark nd/brown und wlLb 110me IIIL an&:'-'W' t.o rounded .and. medium Lo One pined
moln
R8ddlab brown aand wlLb aome alll -
nu Lo medlwn. roY.nded Lo •naular aand
Reddlah brown und wlLb aom• alll. -
<1.0 nn. Lo madlum. roundad Lo anaular Nnd
aome 1raNVquarLa
<1.0
<1.0 Roddllb brown Nlld wllb 90me alll end lrace of clay
'1M Lo mecllwn. a111ular Lo wbe.n,ular Nnd
Sll&hlly molaL
Reddlllb brown alll •U.h aom• aond and trace of 01117
~lal.Lo mrihun, anaular La aubanaular Nnd
~., NoLUed red/brown/•hit.e ■ill with aom• NDd
• Ltaoe alaJ' wlLh llnaa of bioULe -On• Lo medium
1rained und -poorly araded
round.cl Lo anawar Nnd
Lab 11.0
4.0
J,0
4.0
NolUN nd/brown/•hlLe allL wllh aom• aand
LnCltl und/oJay, l.race mica
fine t.o medium. ,ro.lMd Nnd
llolUed red/brown/while 1111. wilh some und
troce und/olay, &nee mloo
ftn• \0 medium, arained und
ltoLUed ncl/brawn/whlLe alll wllh IIOme und
Ltaoe Nnd/olay, Lraoe mica
fine t.o m.dlwn. 1relned Nnd
poor racGft".'J' • lOX
Molt.led uprollte wlLh nllc alructura -•li&hUJ molal
•
.c~ ~ iii, 0
~~ 8
No odor
2
• No odor
5
8 No-·
10 No_,
12
14
16 No odor
18 No odor
20
No odor
22
Sll&hl ..,laW. odor
24
Modlrat.e wolaW• odor
26
Moderate wolaW• odor
28
Moderate wolaW• odor
JO
llod■nte wolaUI■ odor
~ Spill nmple • Bortna tennlnat.ed al. 32",
APPIJED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. -CAROU
190-00001-01 -....... Checbcl S,: £,H.
Oam7-Z5-00
rue 1eo-01u
MACON OOCKERY SITE
CORDOVA, NORTH CAROLINA
JUNE U -15, 2000
SOIL BORING LOG
CSB-3
•
Drilling Started: 6-13-00
Drilling Completed: 6-15-00
Drilling Method: Geoprobe
Drilling Company: AES -Carolinas
Drilled By: Eric Hetrick
Logged By: Eric Hetrick
Soil Boring: CSB-4
,:~ ~ a.ii 0 Lilhologic Description " " a~ 8
2'
4 '
8.
8 •
10
12 •
14 •
18 • I Lob
18 •
20.
22 •
Lob
24 •
28 •
28
Lob
JO.
J2•
lljj
<1.0
19
J,O
(1.0
<1.0
<1.0
20.0
9.0
u
10.0
9.0
4.~
J,0
<1.0
Brown Nnd wl\h aome •lll ■nd oraanlo maLerlaJ ■naular to roWIUCI und, mdlwn Lo On• aroJned
molal
Brown Nnd wiLh 110me ■lll ond or1onio maWrlal
ana;ular I.a roweled eand, madium Lo One 1r■lnod
molal
Reddlab brown NDd w\Lb IOffll 11111. and IOffl■ 1rawel
fln• Lo tarae, rounded Lo ■naular aond
•ma 1ravel • ■llioa/qwuU
Dry
Roddllb brown Nnd wU.h ac,me 1n.vel nn. to Iara■, an,ular Lo ■ubenautar •nd
poorl7 ·-dry quan,/■Wca fnamenLII -fill
Rodcllllb brown NJ1d wlLh 110m■ ■Ill. and Lroc■ of clay nne to m.dlwn. anaular Lo ■uban,ular Nnd
Poorly araded -molal
Mow.d nd,/brown/wbH.e ■Ill wlLh eome and Nila ■Lnac:Lwa wlLb l■I\.MI or biollt.a and f■lcbpar
On• Lo medlum -poorl7 1raded
rounded Lo anautar und
Mow.cl r9Cf/brown/whll.e ■UL wlLh aome sand
nllo ■Lruol.W'a wlLb l■nen or blollL■ and feldspar
nn■ Lo medium -poorl7 1r■ded rounded Lo an,ular und -no uprollt.e
Red/brown/•hlt.e aaprollt.a 11111, with IOIM IOJld
Lra.ce Nnd/claJ relic ■t.naolu.ra, l■RNII or blot.U• -■Liff -dry
Loa oomp-. dry
Roddllh brown/while mol.Ued ■prollLe am. with trooo
of clay and sand. poorly 1raded. fin• to med.lum,
rounded to · .ancul&r -dry
BloULe/rello etructu.ra lenan
Spill Ample
APPUED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. -CAROUNAl -MACON DOCKERY SITE
190-00001-01 -....... C,_... O,,C.H.
Dote1 7-2'-00
ru.: II0-0184
CORDOVA, NORTH CAROLINA
JUNE 13 -1~, 2000
lloderata voe odor
2'
4'
SllahL voe odor
8.
8.
10' SllahL odor
12,
14 No odor
1e Modero.Le odor
18 •
20.
all&hl odor
22 •
Moderate odor
24 •
ModenLe odor
26 •
ModtiraLe odor
28 •
Modent.e odor
JO.
Sll&ht odor
• Bortr11 tarmlnaLecl at 31°,
SOIL BORING
CSB-4
·-LOG
•
APPENDIXB
Field Notes
•
/I
•<\ t ! , Q i ~ 0 (i) J ~ 0 ~ j IT ,/1 " ~ r Ji 1 0 ~ I ~ t l ~ 0 ~ \. 0 © ' t j II l l e J ( ~ -l ! i ~ l f ~ , 0 j
! 1 l "1 ~ ci ~ ') J I ~ 5 6 'l I l l
1 1 \ ' l ~ ! . 0 l t I . ' • ·1
rl-i t \j
l ., j a ~ l 1 ! f J -J f 0 ~ t
r , , ! I ~ (, I ~ "' , i § ~ ~
, 1 J ~ l '-~ l t ~ r I A r J 41 f § 3 t ! 1 r t ~ } l l 0 J l ~ ~ l ~ \ ~ ~ t e .,
~ l 0 I ' ~ i a Q) • ' 1 1 ~ I ~ ( ! t
t l 1 1
' i ~ 0
R
~ t ,/1 \ " ~ J: II ~ ~ ~ i l \ ~ 1 0 0 ! ~ } g ~ ! ,l r ~ ~ 5 ~ 1 l ~ f ~1· l ' I 1 1 t ~ J .5 j r 1 t ~ ~ ! t II 1 ~ f J t 'l ~ l 4. t ' ' ~ ' I { I ! j 1 -I t ' I i • I l r
'
t ! i i l } ' ' ' ! " ! l j 1 1 ' 1 • ~ ~ -5 J l l I i J () I ' ' • ' ' • • • j a 0 ' ' ' I "' I () \'I 1,1 ~ "' ; ..:::_ 0 -61 G' IJ' ~ t" -" Q G 0 -0 0 0 --. . --------. ---------.. . ---------·--· --. .,. . -------·---·-----. -----~ ---··-·-. -··
• •
'"., •. J:a.f-,, -/, ,.Jc.. 0 (J "''') J ... ..,,~ ~.J.
('," J. ,F,--.,._f.d f-0 / v""f t-t..,·s
1 " r o ,,,_ P>-f'" ,,..._ /4. J " v ""' •
fc..t-uf o-'I IL•,Jt-(c r.•~) )a.r,7,.,.k.J csB -I
p .,., ,... ~ c \e... ~ .. ) f"" ,r-. "--e.... ~'-f"" .
('\'. (S-Cdl(~ ~,~sf Jf r .. r -'1(7(! ,, (, o -<z.'), ~ ........... C.JIJ•/
(~ •-<to '-•l(--<-1-J s r ( ,'.->poo"' (~)~117) ~"o "'\ {_ J /) ~ (
('>"It> ...... ,( ... t.k) j p(,'f--'F"' (u.-2·!') rn,""' csi> -I
tS"·-J 0 r<> d:.._'::> ,,,_...,, .... r ~ +-,,-. """ C.G.8 -/
-r,o...-.Q11:•DL~ (9 O""'\.Ci:110
i
. -· 9 i I
§ 0 i 2 l 0 0 i g c-
}
.. ~ . .. ... 6 ~ « i a , 1i • ' • ' I I I • I ' ' I I I I 0 I I 0 '
f
i "' i t 1 { { r 1 a, ~ 0 ! i , c'I l ~ \ 1 l l 0 [ t l 1 ,
f , I ~ f 6 ' ~ i. f \ 1 1 0 l F l { -i A s { l I ~ • r II "' ,,, Ill , t i ~ e e i 1 ~ i J t 1 rJ , ' ! l I 1, t f f f l f -J 11 t , f 0 i , } I e ~ 11
! ~ l f.' , •-~ l ' j 1. J ~ , I ' \I' i ~ i J 1 t t LJ ~ II I ,. ' ~ ~ -I (a I !, t j (' ! s i ' 1 e 0 t f ' f , J r l t
J t ' ,. ~ t y I ~
f t "'
I , ~ I ~ \, '• I 11
i,-1 ~ 1 f .:-~ ' 'I ' , i ! ~ ~ 9 l> i f' l ~ f' , ~ t ~ f t , .. . 1
I i • ' f ~ ~
'
l
\
0 f J • ' r l ' 1 f t t \ ( ' ,
, J ~ t r : r f ,
G 2 , \, 1 • ~ I , " .
1. ~ t J i 0 1 . ~ ~ t l J r (' l l l l I
1 ~ l ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I { I l i f t l .,4 . 1 • I l 1 J ~ f I (II
,..i I i I s ¢ 0 G s I' , 1 f I ti ' t ~ ', ~ • ~ ( f
1 ~ ~-. 1 t f
..S£1/ e)
-Z.p,r ""'Q>.::f CZ),~-;>-,-,.,:,
~
_a::,00
...., ..,,.
....,...«-,:)
• • (J
I
i I
I ' I
' I !
• •
1123.0 ~ ...-0 e..o.-••-~~ (;!) ~~ ~c::::.,....::»
i i e.o-•--"'"I!!. G.~1!;.-..,_
i
i
/1.rr:10 -
-' \
CA-1!»-... -t.S -I "T / G:S.15""4---... 7 . .'Z.~ z..,+
1
' .
<:..o,...~~-~ ~,,....._ ,0::..--llS: ,l"T ~.._ 1"1ot<>....._ ,1.,..-
• •
APPENDIXC
Laboratory Analytical Results
•
Savannah
Laboratories 5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.stlsavlab.com
Mr. Eric Hetrick
Applied Earth Sciences
814 Davidson Drive
Concord, NC 28025
LOG NO: S0-03927
Received: 16 JUN 00
Reported: 28 JUN 00
Project: Macon Dockery/1900000101>
Sampled By: Client
Code: 135800628
REPORT OF RESULTS Page 1
DATE/
LOG NO SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, SOLID OR SEMISOLID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
03927-1 . CSB-1-22-24'
03927-2 CSB-1-28-30'
03927·3 CSB-2-22-24'
03927-4 CSB-2-28-30'
03927-5 CSB-3-22-24'
06-13-00/15:15
06-13-00/15:40
06-15-00/09:15
06-15-00/09:40
06-14-00/09:40
PARAMETER 03927•1 03927-2 03927-3 03927-4 03927-5
Volatiles by GC/MS (8260)
Chloromethane, ug/kg dw
Bromomethane (Methyl
bromide), ug/kg dw
Vinyl chloride, ug/kg dw
Chloroethane, ug/kg dw
Methylene chloride
(Dichloromethane), ug/kg dw
Acetone, ug/kg dw
Carbon disulfide, ug/kg dw
1,1-Dichloroethene, ug/kg dw
1,1-Dichloroethane, ug/kg dw
Cis/Trans-1,2-Dichloroethen
e, ug/kg dw
Chloroform, ug/kg dw
1,2-Dichloroethane, ug/kg dw
2-Butanone (MEK), ug/kg dw
1,1,1-Trichloroethane, ug/kg dw
Carbon tetrachloride, ug/kg dw
<16
<16
<16
<16
<7.9
100
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<40
<7.9
<7.9
<15
<15
<15
<15
<7.6
<76
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<38
<7.6
<7.6
<590*F65
<590
<590
<590
<290
<2900
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
<1500
<290
<290
<16
<16
<16
<16
<8.1
85
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<40
<8.1
<8.1
<570*F65
<570
<570
<570
<280
<2800
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<1400
<280
<280
• •
Savannah
Laboratories 5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.stlsavlab.com ,_.,_,..,,. __ ,_,,,
Mr. Eric Hetrick
Applied Earth Sciences
814 Davidson Drive
Concord, NC 28025
LOG NO: S0-03927
Received: 16 JUN 00
Reported: 28 JUN 00
Project: Macon Dockery/1900000101>
Sampled By: Client
Code: 135800628
REPORT OF RESULTS Page 2
LOG NO
03927-1
03927-2
03927-3
03927-4
03927-5
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, SOLID OR SEMISOLID SAMPLES
CSB-1-22-24'
CSB·l-28-30'
CSB-2-22-24'
CSB-2-28-30'
CSB-3-22-24'
PARAMETER 03927-1
Bromodichloromethane, ug/kg dw
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane,
ug/kg dw
1,2-Dichloropropane, ug/kg dw
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene,
ug/kg dw
Trichloroethene, ug/kg dw
Dibromochloromethane, ug/kg dw
1,1,2-Trichloroethane, ug/kg dw
Benzene, ug/kg dw
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene, ug/kg dw
Bromoform, ug/kg dw
2-Hexanone, ug/kg dw
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
(MIBK), ug/kg dw
Tetrachloroethene, ug/kg dw
Toluene, ug/kg dw
Chlorobenzene, ug/kg dw
Ethylbenzene, ug/kg dw
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<40
<40
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
<7.9
03927-2
----------
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<38
<38
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
<7.6
----------
03927-3
----------
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
<1500
<1500
<290
<290
<290
<290 ----------
DATE/
TIME SJ\MPLED
06-13-00/15:15
06-13-00/15:40
06-15-00/09:15
06-15-00/09:40
06-14-00/09:40
03927-4 03927-5
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<40
<40
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1
<8.1 ----------
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<1400
<1400
<280
<280
<280
<280
----------
• •
Savannah
Laboratories 5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.stlsavlab.com ·---, ... -. ...,
Mr. Eric Hetrick
Applied Earth Sciences
814 Davidson Drive
Concord, NC 28025
LOG NO: S0-03927
Received: 16 JUN 00
Reported: 28 JUN 00
Project: Macon Dockery/1900000101>
Sampled By: Client
Code: 135800628
REPORT OF RESULTS Page 3
LOG NO
03927-1
03927-2
03927-3
03927-4
03927-5
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, SOLID OR SEMISOLID SAMPLES
CSB-1-22-24'
CSB-1-28-30'
CSB-2-22-24'
CSB-2-28-30'
CSB-3-22-24'
PARAMETER
Styrene, ug/kg dw
Xylenes, Total, ug/kg dw
Surrogate Toluene-dB
03927-1
<7.9
<16
95 Ir
97 Ir
92 Ir Surrogate -4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surrogate -Dibromofluoromethane
Dilution Factor 1
06.23.00 Analysis Date
Batch ID 1M0622
03927-2 03927-3
--------------------
<7.6 <290
<15 <590
95 "' 81 Ir
97 "' 76 Ir
92 Ir 86 Ir
l 40
06.23.00 06.20.00
1M0622 200619
DATE/
TIME SAMPLED
06-13-00/15:15
06-13-00/15:40
06-15-00/09:15
06-15-00/09:40
06-14-00/09:40
03927-4 03927-5
--------------------
<8.1 <280
<16 <570
94 Ir 80 " 94 Ir 80 Ir
96 " 94 Ir
l 40
06.23.00 06.20.00
1M0622 200619
Percent Solids 70 68 68 67 70
• •
Savannah
Laboratories 5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.stlsavlab.com
Mr. Eric Hetrick
Applied Earth Sciences
814 Davidson Drive
Concord, NC 28025
LOG NO: S0-03927
Received: 16 JUN 00
Reported: 28 JUN 00
Project: Macon Dockery/1900000101>
Sampled By: Clie,nt
Code: 135800628
REPORT OF RESULTS Page 4
LOG NO
03927-6
03927-7
03927-8
03927-9
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, SOLID OR SEMISOLID SAMPLES
CSB-3-28-30'
CSB-4-22-24'
CSB-4-28-30'
CSB-4-15-17'
PARAMETER
Volatiles by GC/MS (8260)
Chloromethane, ug/kg dw
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide), ug/kg dw
Vinyl chloride, ug/kg dw
Chloroethane, ug/kg dw
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane),
ug/kg dw
Acetone, ug/kg dw
Carbon disulfide, ug/kg dw
1,1-Dichloroethene, ug/kg dw
1,1-Dichloroethane, ug/kg dw
Cis/Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene, ug/kg dw
Chloroform, ug/kg dw
1,2-Dichloroethane, ug/kg dw
2-Butanone (MEK), ug/kg dw
1,1,1-Trichloroethane, ug/kg dw
Carbon tetrachloride, ug/kg dw
Bromodichloromethane, ug/kg dw
l,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane, ug/kg dw
1,2-Dichloropropane, ug/kg dw
03927-6
<570*F65
<570
<570
<570
<280
<2800
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<1400
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
03927-7
<560*F65
<560
<560
<560
<280
<2800
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<1400
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
DATE/
TIME SAMPLED
06-14-00/11:05
06-15-00/13:45
06-15-00/14:20
06-15-00/13 :25
03927-8
<1400*F65
<1400
<1400
<1400
<690
<6900
<690
<690
<690
<690
<690
<690
<3500
<690
<690
<690
<690
<690
03927-9
<590*F65
<590
<590
<590
<290
<2900
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
<1500
<290
<290
<290
<290
<290
• •
Savannah
laboratories 5102 LaRoche Avenue• Savannah, GA 31404 • [phone] • Fax[phone] • www.stlsavlab.com ,_ .. _, __ ""
Mr. Eric Hetrick
Applied Earth Sciences
814 Davidson Drive·
Concord, NC 28025
LOG NO: S0-03927
Received: 16 JUN 00
Reported: 28 JUN 00
Project: Macon Dockery/1900000101>
Sampled By: Client
Code: 135800628
REPORT OF RESULTS Page 5
DATE/
LOG NO SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, SOLID OR SEMISOLID SAMPLES TIME SAMPLED
03927-6 CSB-3-28-30' 06-14-00/11:05
03927-7 CSB-4-22-24' 06-15-00/13:45
03927-8 CSB-4-28-30' 06-15-00/14:20
03927-9 CSB-4-15-17' 06-15-00/13:25
PARAMETER
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene, ug/kg dw
Trichloroethane, ug/kg dw
Dibromochlorornethane, ug/kg dw
1,1,2-Trichloroethane, ug/kg dw
Benzene, ug/kg dw
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene, ug/kg dw
Bromoform, ug/kg dw
2-Hexanone, ug/kg dw
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK), ug/kg dw
Tetrachloroethene, ug/kg dw
Toluene, ug/kg dw
Chlorobenzene, ug/kg dw
Ethylbenzene, ug/kg dw
Styrene, ug/kg dw
Xylenes, Total, ug/kg dw
Surrogate Toluene-dB
Surrogate -4-Brornofluorobenzene
Surrogate -Dibromofluoromethane
Dilution Factor
Analysis Date
Batch ID
Percent Solids
03927-6
----------
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<1400
<1400
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<570
83 'Ir
83 'Ir
97 'Ir
40
06.20.00
200619
70
03927-7
----------
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<1400
<1400
<280
<280
<280
<280
<280
<560
80 'Ir
80 t
97 'Ir
40
06.20.00
200619
71
03927-8 03927-9
--------------------
<690 <290
<690 <290
<690 <290
<690 <290
<690 <290
<690 <290
<690 <290
<3500 <1500
<3500 <1500
<690 <290
<690 <290
<690 <290
<690 <290
<690 <290
<1400 <590
86 'Ir 94 'Ir
86 'Ir 97 'Ir
100 'Ir 111 'Ir
100 40
06.20.00 06.20.00
200619 200619
72 68
• •
Savannah
Laboratories __ .,_,_,__,">< 5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.stlsavlab.com
Mr. Eric Hetrick
Applied Earth Sciences
814 Davidson Drive
Concord, NC 28025
LOG NO: S0-03927
Received: 16 JUN 00
Reported: 28 JUN 00
Project: Macon Dockery/1900000101>
Sampled By: Client
Code: 135800628
REPORT OF RESULTS Page 6
DATE/
LOG NO
03927-10
03927-11
03927-12
03927-13
03927-14
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, QC REPORT FOR SOLID/SEMISOLID TIME SAMPLED
Method Blank
Lab Control Standard t Recovery
LCS Accuracy Control Limit (%R)
Lab Control Standard Duplicate% Recovery
Precision (\-RPD) of LCS/LCSD
PARAMETER
Volatiles by GC/MS (8260)
Chloromethane, ug/kg dw
Bromomethane (Methyl
bromide), ug/kg dw
Vinyl chloride, ug/kg dw
Chloroethane, ug/kg dw
Methylene chloride
(Dichloromethane), ug/kg dw
Acetone, ug/kg dw
Carbon disulfide, ug/kg dw
1,1-Dichloroethene, ug/kg dw
1,1-Dichloroethane, ug/kg dw
Cis/Trans-1,2-Dichloroethen
e, ug/kg dw
Chloroform, ug/kg dw
1,2-Dichloroethane, ug/kg dw
2-Butanone (MEK), ug/kg dw
1,1,1-Trichloroethane, ug/kg dw
Carbon tetrachloride, ug/kg dw
03927-10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<5.0
<50
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<25
<5. 0
<5.0
03927-11
110 \-
03927-12 03927-13
40-164 \-78 \-
03927-14
34 \-
f r r , • •
Savannah
Laboratories , ___ ,..,. __ __ 5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • [phone] • Fax [phone] • www.stlsavlab.com
Mr. Eric Hetrick
Applied Earth Sciences
814 Davidson Drive
Concord, NC 28025
LOG NO: S0-03927
Received: 16 JUN 00
Reported: 28 JUN 00
Project: Macon Dockery/1900000101>
Sampled By: Client
Code: 135800628
REPORT OF RESULTS Page 7
DATE/
LOG NO
03927-10
03927-11
03927-12
03927-13
03927-14
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, QC REPORT FOR SOLID/SEMISOLID TIME SAMPLED
Method Blank
Lab Control Standard t Recovery
LCS Accuracy Control Limit (tR)
Lab Control Standard Duplicate t Recovery
Precision (\RPD) of LCS/LCSD
PARAMETER 03927-10
Bromodichloromethane, ug/kg dw <5.0
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane,
ug/kg dw
1,2-Dichloropropane, ug/kg dw
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene,
ug/kg dw
Trichloroethene, ug/kg dw
Dibromochloromethane, ug/kg dw
1,1,2-Trichloroethane, ug/kg dw
Benzene, ug/kg dw
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene, ug/kg dw
Bromoform, ug/kg dw
2-Hexanone, ug/kg dw
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
(MIBK), ug/kg dw
Tetrachloroethene, ug/kg dw
Toluene, ug/kg dw
Chlorobenzene, ug/kg dw
Ethylbenzene, ug/kg dw
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<25
<25
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
03927-11
104 t
96 t
96 %-
100 %-
03927-12
51-146 %-
49-142 %-
38-158 %-
66·135 %-
03927-13
82 t
82 t
82 %-
94 \-
03927-14
24 t
16 t
16 \-
6 t
• ' • 1 • •
Savannah
Laboratories 5102 LaRoche Avenue • Savannah, GA 31404 • [phone] · Fax [phone] • www.stisavlab.com
·-·-·--...
LOG NO: S0-03927
Received: 16 JUN 00
Reported: 28 JUN 00
Mr. Eric Hetrick
Applied Earth Sciences
814 Davidson Drive
Concord, NC 28025
Project: Macon Dockery/1900000101>
Sampled By: Client
Code: 135800628
REPORT OF RESULTS Page 8
LOG NO
03927-10
03927-11
03927-12
03927-13
03927-14
DATE/
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION, QC REPORT FOR SOLID/SEMISOLID TIME SAMPLED
Method Blank
Lab Control Standard\-Recovery
LCS Accuracy Control Limit (\'R)
Lab Control Standard Duplicate\-Recovery
Precision (\-RPD) of LCS/LCSD
PARAMETER 03927-10 03927-11 03927-12 03927-13 03927-14
Styrene, ug/kg dw
Xylenes, Total, ug/kg dw
Surrogate Toluene-dB
<5.0
<10
94 \-
96 \'
96 \' Surrogate -4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surrogate -Dibromofluoromethane
Dilution Factor 1
06.22.00 Analysis Date
Batch ID 1M0622
96 \'
102 \'
96 \'
1
06.22.00
1M0622
64-136 \-
63-135 \-
58-142 \-
82 \-
98 \-
72 \-
1
06.22.00
1M0622
These test results meet all the requirements of NELAC. All questions
regarding this test report should be directed to the STL Project Manager
who signed this test report.
SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Third Edition,
September 1986, and Updates I, II, IIA, IIB, and III.
*F65 = Elevated detection limits were reported due to sample matrix
interference which required sample or extract dilution.
NA
NA
NA
Serial Number, Q Q 4 9 Q 7 ---------------------------------------
Savannah
Laboratories
ROJECT REFERENCE
~~ 0C:C¥ ,:;;;,q,.,:
TL (LAB) PROJECT MANAGER
c_-.-s -oo
•00
-1.S-<>0 O't
., ... -oo o'M-0
(4 •J.,t-OD 1105:
'-0--<>0 34,S
b-•r-, ...... -z.o
-,.s--ac:, 1.32..S::-
R
ANALYSIS REQUEST AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
=e.
PROJECT NO.
'1()•0000\-0\
P.O. NUMBER
-'L
2:'St -30 ' -2. -
. 3 -I I z.-.. -2.'\-
c..,.,a. . ~ -'Z..1e'-3o'
-~ -z..~-M-\
' I -.30
-11,•-,,'
DATE TIME
G.•l>•co /'1(C)
DATE TIME
PROJECT LOCATION
{STATE) t..Jc_.
CONTRACT NO.
MATRIX
TYPE
ac ~
g
w
>-' z w > J 0 "' _j
Q.
0 5 a
J
"' ~ 0 w ~ a < z 0 z
RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE)
RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE)
J ~ ~ H i G)
-t
..3,
:J
.3,
3-
.3
~
3,
3
~5102 L..aRoche Avenue, Savannah, GA 31404 6 2846 Industrial Plaza Drive, Tallahassee, Fl 32301
0 900 Lakeside Drive. Mobile, AL 36693
0 6712 Benjamin Rd., Suite 100, Tampa, Fl 33634
REQUIRED ANALYSES
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS SUBMITTED
Phone: {912) 354-7858 Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Phone: {334) 666-6633 Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone] Fa,c [phone]
PAGE OF
I \
STANDARD REPORT
DELIVERY 0
DATE DUE, ____ _
EXPEDITED REPORT
DELIVERY
(SURCHARGE) 0
DATE DUE: ____ _
NUMBER OF COOLERS SUBMITTED
SHIPMENT:
REMARKS
.3,
DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE TIME
DATE TIME RECEIVED BY: (SIGNATURE) DATE . '"
LABORATORY USE QNL Y
RECEIVED FOR LABORATORY BY: DATE TIME CUSTODY INTACT CUSTODY STL-SL LOG NO. LABORATORY REMARKS:
{SIGNATURE)
' 1,/00
SEAL NO.
ff" YES fo-OJ</2. l
• •
APPENDIXD
USEP A Isopropyl Alcohol/ Acetone Newsletter
l'l.J.r15-~ 15:33 SIL~ 1.-Hb:::i ~·
. .. .. . ' . ------... -, T11£U ·rs;NO,·~ -~-.. -· :.i_:'.-
. .,Ofl~· .,·r,•·' ,....._..,., . .... . . ~--0, ,nL,f., ,(aicccooc ....,
::, J....:'. ..:,:.,...;. • .., .. c,..,, • ~·oo:of., ~1. ' ~ .,. • • • • •• • •
~~ !ipt"::°~ ~~;: ·b1·:·lho·•.w;~ ·where does the an-site
fling. . · · '\ .,,...,. of isop<op-
Do lho· ... 111 .. a1 -yl .-1. IPA_lk-. to 1 •1 com from~ ~:~::i1?-",.'!;~. :.'1_':.';::i.,: ace,_ ne ra1 __ a . ,
Meed wtc:h acetooe. a action• ·II was ~ ,.
liquid !bar cao move ' ~ial basis' . IPA field uo, IN ·u,e,
quicl<ly _lhfouch lb ,..1,, · of __,,. pcodll<· Apin; IPA ls .wl<Jj. &led as • do
sudm:c u,cl • hquid die tioo for mu,y ,..,., I doa lluld·dilnng fidd Am EPA often coasid<n. ~ . yua. ·. · · · · piing aalvici,$. ·•;.• . haz■rdoo< -?:·· · · . _.. , IPA it·• color-UJOdar fllll .-1111. IPA is cll'ec•
The .i-oaswu; '"' _.y _.._., · less. ••~'?• flam-live 81 c1ooD1ng a ....,,,, of sampliDI
iJ oo. . . . • mol)lo ti'J"id Wllh ..,...«4VW 5udl IS J>aud augca
We bellow, isopr<>pyl -!• *hic;h i a ve,:y slight odor. spom1a.1. ..,_Is ud 1:i>na. .
is often ascd u_ • ~ flmd Physical ~es IPA is ol'1l:n ,uppliod. iD Uo 1,-lilo: daring field· -lmc ..,...,..,, .._ · ot in_. ioclude amber gJau jiu>; ·bo....,u,•a QW form low lo•• of -whcD ... · . lhe !ollowinc: n,on pcao:t;.,i u io· inqs&,,-lPA a:
p>scd IO suolighl QI' I •• IPA'• ... •l>cmi<al . -· D■ifCDC sq-. boala· OI heal:-"' 1!""" I r_.1a .. ·(CH3)i olllcrspmY~CGQIIUICn.-· .,.,..,,_.....i,-, QIOH . . . .,. .,._ as I . ·1· • •
--of ,ul,. . • lu boi .. , pOUII Whichtvcrconl>il1ctilllsad(orlPA IINE!iTlGAnotl • · ii 82.3~ . slon,e and bandliog durini. field
. CGlllllDt; . • D'A ii lowly solohlo in.,_. wnpliDI aclivloe.. it is po$iible lhai
.... ~. -be . • ilS .. po,~" 20"C Is 33 mm lhe <OllWD<t cao be exposed IO S\111•
. i:,:v~~Y ':; :;1~A.; ~i~ ~. 2D:C: is 0.78~ 1/ ~~ ia ::' ::u ~~ ~~
lhc coviroomcal via ~ dispoRI · crn3 . · . • rims can approach days:
of rtnsa,a,· or used cfcconlaminalion ·. Noa, lha1 IPA is not u_ volllilc _as The ac:at-iioarce
Ouid. IPA ,olulion dw .....w on a mc<hanol or dhal!ol; this sugcs<> 11 ii Ibo abwcd D'A 1ha1 may lead 10
wnpling dMl:e ...r.c., ill"' con be n>-IPA would ·cuo lollgcr 10 •""°""' ...,000 fomiatio,,. .
lcued dlr<dly ro 1be covkoo.,.,,.. ,....,. tho J;quid is. o,q,oscd .:.t aar. MY fom,cd IICClono 00D be inad-•
f~l'"11 to idcnlify an IPA .ruaion · In cenenl. sceoodary ~ ols '°~ tendy rc1casod dinclly lO the mviron,. u the sowcc of ICClODO can lead to '11.D--t i,i: IPA m JOOrO reacnve Ihm pn-mctu" via impropc:r ddpoal of rinla'6.
neccsury ud upul'Jv1 amlylical . mary atcohols. Two i~ponant ~-For example. after riMing the wn--
.:oiu as lite inYCmgatorS 5"feb me ' tioas arc dcbydrogenation and~ plinf materials with IPA. iri the f"teld.
subSmfa<c ror c:onwnhWion dw may lioo. IPA is dolly~ YI> •he lhc ri.-is "'mclimcs allowal ro
be u anif¥:C of• dcconwniAition pr<r following reaaiGD: · simply flow Ol\l0 1bc ~-..
;:odUIO. ·. • (CH3)i CHOH ➔ Cll3COCH3 + Hz Then, also <111 be dirccl ton1anunr
Ac&ltoDo baslca . · · The retci:ioa procblru ~ auronc tion of ,amplcd media lfsornt IPA ,o-
Aceeont ii a coloricu. ~e liq-, and hydrogen; dw i1 an cndod'lermic Jution remains on the sampling device
old· wllh a mildly puopal ud ,hply rcacdon 1h11 requires a mew cawyH surface: equipment blanks may 1101 de-
swccl odor. . 1 f-or.hid> yields. On lhe induslrial lcv-..., lhc occumnce of lhis ~ Ocj,endi,lt on_ lhc ~odor iq di>-d, clchydro,eulion ii nomially car-non.
:hai:gc, acclOt>C IS ooosidcfed • baiard-ricd OUI an lhc npor pliasc al 300 lo , Oelcclion may depend rnon: OD the
I ou, ,..,.. by me EPA. WbJlc no lllink-, SOO'C. ~ ""!"lfSIS i,,dude cop-
ing wuer standards have · bo;oa • per. dvomium. zmc a_nd ~I. . _ ~ w~ ~ t4follp,ncnt blank is '°l-
1 osl>blishcd. DEP has p<opowl • gu.S.. . 'Ibe oxidation ....., .. _., •cry '':""-lcc1od man on lhe IOcal •ime 'l'""' on I ooee co-of 700 putt _pct bil• 1ar 10 lhc dd>ydnigCll&D .. rcact100. the sampii,,g CY<DL l1 also may be_ a
lion. In \ltuct wnplcs. KCtOnC u: quan--c:xccpt tha, oxygen UI I R¥tanL The fwlction of * pqssible ~c of lrlUlti-
tified via EPA m8&bod 8240. oxidaliOfl rcaiction is below: · pie IPA containers (L~-. 1omo .. old''
Bel.,., is a.wt of -••no•, ph:,,ical (Cll))i CHOH+ 1/2 0i ➔ end some "fle>h" conllioas): liill lho
JJOpCIIIIOS' CH COCH H O CONUlWll QII QU: ,reps tO minimize • --~•• chomical lonnula i, 3 . 3 -. 2 . lhe OC<UJT<ote of "'is poo,nlill prQb-CHJCOCHl : Acmooe and wattr aro .tbo ~bon : lem:
, ilS bollinSPoiot ii 56.1 "C pn>dll<IS. ~Hbat calaJyzc Ibo do-• fidd-..,boici•ns nic<I to be io-
• -Is Ullally ,olDblc ia -hydn>~CIIIIIOO ·--also calllyz< . mu<led reganUnr lhe handlin& of D'A . . or.....-"' 20"C is IBS IM1 oxld■rion; unJi~ Ibo _dohydrogcna• cootainen: direcl oxposur• of IPA ~ us Tap ·, liC!ft ru,;:b':"1-.tbil RICbOll _IS ex.other-. wncaincn to suaJipt or heat sboUld
. ~;, d<mily 11 20"C i, 0_783 " ! ml< and 11. cs often canied qut a1 be kept to• minimum •
. , . , · somewbAI i>igber !<mpcrWra. Aar · , pn,por disposal of rillSOIC i, impel· :m3 · · . .···,-yields arc normally lower. . alive ~ we boliovc ac:ewoe,'s UDCX-' · A Uquid-phuc oxicb.lio.n process .. it may be pcudonl 10 c$llblish a.
-PfCKDCC ...,-be Ibo resuJ• ~ also OC<111> al lower t<mpc:nmn,s ud proc:cdurc lhal ,ncks IPA usage. _in-•
J>A'sruoli ... wid>molifbzorbcaL --lh■n lho.l'MI --do-cludu,i IPA •=:r-ud filling For·ouaq,Je. analylical rcsalls Cram• sa:ibcd above. The paeraJ ruclion dams: 1111, wou1 belp ro idenlif'
;u, dPI is san,j>kd ~-1 DIii)' fail to ii below: . "old" IPA fidcl contalincn and poss~
ho., _,,b!o ~ !or. SOVml (Ol))i CHOH -. 0i ➔ bl)' ...;,c in1lie explanalion of raudom
.-,,. -· -biU · . pliov, lhco lilow ' . . Cll3COCI3 + H20z • it is irnpcra<i;.,, 1ha1 s:ampling
low )evels or-.. I-lbo reaetion proch,cU ""' JtdDnc equipmen1 be •11,y,• i.e.. no IPA iw•
In sovcnl cn,undwo-and bydnigai p;mxide: lhil icaclioD duo.can be p,_,,~ prior 10 lllc-cquip-
ccr monitor wells j· rcquin:aa.pcroxideinitia&or .. · mcnt'5 1l5e
,n,J/ar soil ,_ies ·Ir is·bci.m4 lbat D'A:c:m be "de-
dunn, •-~ qua,,· f· ·ggded" <r>-ono iD Ibo PfC:'Cll"O or
"'· · · sunlipl. Howcvu; convffllODS arc Owa • Joni. lime, · probably low. Tbe ,..uiling -....
lhe -llll1 """"""1Bdo -,ill can be bigh come u,c1 ro: Somo-a,oaiJi to be eaviroama,ully si,P>ifi-
~ ICC!COOe •• may , . cant. •
•"''·be undrtt:etnd; odx:r W'DCSt KCCouc may
be dr:lcclod ia ... ·--~---TOT'"'-. P.03