NCD980840409_19890622_Charles Macon Lagoon & Drum_FRBCERCLA SPD_Project Operations Plan - June 1989-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
g
I
CHARLES MACON LAGOON NPL PROJECT OPERATION PLAN
JUNE 1989
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
D
D
I
I
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
RECEIVED' REGION IV
345 COURTLAND STREET, N.E.
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30365 JUn~9189
··-If
MEM)RANDlJM
DATE: June 22, 1989
i
SUBJECI': RI/FS Pr.oject Oper.ation Plan for. the Maoon-Dxker.y CERCIA Site,
COr.dova, Nor.th car.olina
FROM: John s. Nahrstedt
Remedial Pr.oject Manager
'ID: Char.latte Var.lashkin
Nor.th Car.olina Depar.tment of Human Resour.ces
Attached is a copy of the second dr.aft RI/FS P.r.oject Oper.ations Plan (POP) for.
the above r.efer.enced site. Due to a change in the PRPs contr.actor. the second
dr.aft has been pr.epar.ed by Si.r.r.ine Envir.onmental consultants wher.eas the. fi.r.st
dr.aft was pr.epar.ed by Char.les T. Main, Inc. Please r.eview the POP and pr.ovide
me with comments no late.r. than July 12, 1989. If you have any questions: please
call me at 404/347-7791, ext. 33. Thank you for. your. pr.ompt attention to this·
matter..
Attachments
cc: Ms. Lee Cr.osby, Chief Super.fund Br.anch, NCDHR
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
n
D
0
D
D
I
I
I
PROJECT OPERATIONS PLAN
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY
MACON/DOCKERY SITE
RICHMOND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
JUNE 1989
SEC JOB NO. G-9168
SIRRINE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECT OPERATIONS PLAN
FOR THE
MACON/DOCKERY SITE
RICHMOND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared By: ___________ _
Gordon A. Peterson
Project Man1=1ger
Sirrine Environmental Consultants
Approved By: ___________ _
Doug Lair
Chief, Hazardous Waste Section
EPA Region IV, ESD
Approved By: ___________ _
John S. Nahrstedt
Superfund Project Manager
EPA Region IV
Approved By: ___________ _
Wade Knight
Chief, Quality Assurance
and Laboratory Evaluation Section
EPA Region IV, ESD
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
u
0
0
D
D
I
•
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF ACRONYMS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECTS OPERATION PLAN ORGANIZATION
1.2 SITE LOCATION AND HISTORY
1.3 SITE DESCRIPTION
1.3.1 General Information
1.3.2 General Site Physiography/Geology
1.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
1.5 PROJECT SCHEDULE
1.6 PROJECT ORGANIZATION
1.7 SITE MANAGEMENT
2.0 FIELD SAMPLING PLAN
2.1 OVERVIEW
Data Quality Objectives 21.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.1.5
RI Sample Handling and Analytical Requirements
Site Security
Potable Water Supply
Health and Safety Procedures
2.2 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
Overview
Survey Procedure
Quality Control for Geophysical Survey
iii
PAGE
iii
X
xii
xiii
1
1
3
5
5
6
7
11
11
16
18
18
~9
22
26
27
27
27
27
28
31
I
I TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I 2.3 SOIL SAMPLING PROGRAM 32
I 2.3.1 Surface Soil Sampling 32
2.3.2 Surface Soil Sampling Procedures 32
2.3.3 Test Pits/Subsurface Soil Sampling -35
I Potential Source Areas
2.3.4 Test Pit Excavation and Sampling Procedures 36
2.3.5 Soil Boring Sampling -,Potential Source Areas 38
I 2.3.6 Soil Boring Sampling Procedures 40
2.3.7 Soil Boring Sampling -Monitoring Wells 41
2.3.8 Soil Boring Sampling Procedures -41
I Monitoring Wells
2.3.9 Sampling Personnel and Equipment 43
2.3.10 Soil Sampling Equipment Decontamination 44 g 2.3.11 Background Soil Samples 46
2.3.12 Quality Control for Soil Sampling 46
D 2.4 SEDIMENT SAMPLING PROGRAM 48
D 2.4.1 Streambed Sediment Sampling Procedure 48
2.4.2 Pond Sediment Sampling Procedure 50
2.4.3 Sampling Personnel and Equipment 50
E 2.4.4 Decontamination for Streambed Sediment Sampling Equipment 52 ' 2.4.5 Background Streambed Sediment Samples 53
2.4.6 Quality Control for Streambed Sediment Sampling 53
I 2.5 SURFACE WATER SAMPLING PROGRAM 54
I 2.5.1 Stream Sampling Procedures 54
2.5.2 Pond Sampling Procedures 55
2.5.3 Sampling Personnel and Equipment 55
I 2.5.4 Decontamination for Surface Water Sampling Equipment 56
2.5.5 Background Surface Water Sampling 57
2.5.6 Quality Control for Surface Water Sampling 58
I 2.6 TANK SAMPLING 59
I 2.6.1 Tank Sampling Procedures 59
2.6.2 Sampling Personnel and Equipment 60
I
iv
I
I
I
I TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I 2.7 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION 61
I 2.7.1 Well Installation Procedures 61
2.7.2 Task Team and Responsibilities 62
2.7.3 Equipment and Procedures 62
I 2.7.4 Soil Sampling for Physical Properties Determination 64
2.7.5 Detailep Well Installation Procedures 64
2.7.6 Well Development 68 I 2.7.7 Equipment Decontamination 68
2.7.8 Disposal of Excess Cuttings and Drilling Fluids 70
• 2.8 GROUND WATER SAMPLING PROGRAM 71
I 2.8.1 Ground Water Sampling Procedures 71
2.8.2 Task Team and Responsibilities 72
2.8.3 Equipment and Procedures 72
g 2.8.4 Well Evacuation 75
2.8.5 Sample Collection 76
2.8.6 Decontamination for Ground Water Sampling 77
D 2.8.7
Equipment
Quality Control for Ground Water Sampling 78
2.8.8 Ground Water Level Measurement 79
D 2.8.8.1 Equipment and Procedures 79
2.8.8.2 Equipment Decontamination 80
m 2.8.9 Total Well Depth Measurement 80
m 2.9 HYDRAULIC TESTING 80
2.9.1 Hydraulic Testing Locations 83 • 2.9.2 Task Team and Responsibilities 83
2.9.3 Slug Test Procedures 83
2.9.4 Pumping Test. 85
I 2.9.5 · Equipment Decontamination 86
2.10 SOIL GAS SURVEY 86
I 2.11 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION 86
2.12 SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY 88
2.13 SAMPLE PACKAGING AND SHIPPING 92
I
V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
3.0 DATA COLLECTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN 98
' 3.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES FOR MEASUREMENTS OF DATA 98
3.1.1 Precision
3.1.2 Accuracy
3.1.3 Representatiyeness
3.1.4 Completeness
3.1.5 Comparability
3.2 SAMPLING QUALITY ASSURANCE
3.2.1 Sample Containers
3.2.2 Methods of Sampling
3.3 SAMPLE CUSTODY,
3.4 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
3.4.1 AnalY1ical Support Levels
3.4.1.1 Level IV
3.4.1.2 Level Ill
3.4.1.3 Lev~! I
3.5 CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND FREQUENCY
3.5.1 Laboratory Equipment
3.5.2 Field Instrumentation
3.5.2.1 Calibration Identification
3.5.2.2 Calibration Standards
3.5.2.3 Calibration Frequency
3.6 DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION AND REPORTING
3.6.1
3.6.2
3.6.3
' I
Data Reduction
Validation cit Data
Data Reporting
vi
98
99
100
101
101
102
102
l05
l05
l06
115
115
115
118
l 18
~ 18
119
120
121
121
124
124
124
128
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3.7 INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL
3. 7.1 Sampling Quality Assurance
3.7.1.1 Field Blanks
3. 7.1.2 Rins.ate Blanks
3.7.1.3, Trip'Blanks
3. 7 .1.4 Duplicates
3.7.1.5 Standard Quality Assurance Samples
3. 7.1.6 Split Samples
3. 7.1. 7 Background Samples
3.7.2 Laboratory Quality Assurance
3. 7.2.1 Surrogate and Spike Standard Recoveries
3.7.2.2 Calibrations
3.7.2.3 Quality Control Checks for Sources of Contamination
3. 7.2.4 Quality Control Standards Preparation Checks
3.7.2.5 Organic Program Quality Control Requirements
3.7.2.6 Inorganic Program Quality Control Requirements
3.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS
3.8.1 Performance Audits
3.8.2 System Audits
3.9 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES
•
3.9.1 Laboratory
3.9.2 Field Equipment
3.10 CORRECTIVE ACTION
3.10.1 Laboratory
3.10.2 Field Activities
3.11 QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS
vii
PAGE
129
130
130
130
130
131
131
131
132
132
133
133
135
135
136
141
143
144
145
146
146
146
147
147
148
150
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.0 HEAL TH AND SAFETY PLAN
4.1 COORDINATION AND RESPONSIBILITY
4.2 HAZARD ASSESSMENT
4.3 QUALITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS
4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.4.1 Organic Vapor Detection
4.4.2 Explosimeter
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
4.5.1 Respirator Protection
4.5.2 Non-Respiratory Personal Protective Equipment
4.5.3 Additional PPE Based on Need
4.5.4 EPNOversight Contractor PPE
HEAT/COLD STRE9S PROTECTIVE MEASURES
ACCIDENT PREVENTION
STANDARD OPERATING SAFETY PROCEDURES AND CONTROLS
4.8.1
4.8.2
4.8.3
4.8.4
Personal Precautions
Operational Requirements
Drilling Safety
Adherence ,to Buddy System
4.9 DECONTAMINATION CONTROL MEASURES
4.9.1 Site Organization and Control
4.9.2 Decontamination Procedures
4.9.3 Medical Emergencies
4.10 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT
4.11 EMERGENCY PRO.CEDURES
4. 11.1 General Emergency Procedures
4.11.2 Personal Injury
4.11.3 Chemical Exposure
4.11.4 Fire or· Expbsion
4.11.5 Primary Emergency Contacts
4.11.6 Spill Control Contingency Plan
viii
PAGE
151
151
152
176
177
'177
177
178
178
178
179
179
179
181
181
181
183
185
185
185
186
189
190
191
191
192
193
193
. 195
195
196
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.0
6.0
7.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4.12 TRAINING OF PERSONNEL
4.13 MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE
4.14 RECORDKEEPING
4.15 JOB EXPOSURE REPORT
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
DATA MANAGEMENT
REFERENCES
I APPENDIX A: CompuChem Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ix
PAGE
196
197
200
202
204
205
207
I
I LIST OF FIGURES
I FIGURE TITLE PAGE
1.1 Site Location Map 4
I 1.2 Schedule for Project Completion 12
I 1.3 Project Management Organization 13
2.1 Monitoring Well and Test Pit Location 24
I Map--Macon Site
2.2 Monitoring Well and Test Pit Location 25 I Map--Dockery Site
I 2.3 EM-31 Survey Area--Macon Site 29
2.4 EM-31 Survey Area--Dockery ;:me 30
I 2.5 Surface Soil Sample Location 33
Map-Macon Site
I 2.6 Surface Soil Sample Location 34
Map-Dockery Site
I 2.7 Test Pit Report Form 39
I 2.8 Streambed Sediment/Surface Water 49
Sample Location Map
I 2.9 Typical Monitoring Well Construction Detail 63
2.10 Well Construction Detail Form 69
I 2.11 Field Data Information Log 74
I 2.12 Ground Water Level Monitoring Report 81
2.13 Water Level Sampling Report 82
I 2.14 Chain of Custody Form 90
I
X
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF FIGURES (CONTINUED)
FIGURE TITLE
2.15 Shipment Information Form
2.16 Request for Analysis Form
3.1 Sample Instrument Calibration
xi
PAGE
96
97
122
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE
2.1
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
4.1
LIST OF TABLES
TITLE
Summary of Phase I RI Field Activities
Summary of Phase II RI Field Activities
Soil Sample Physical Property Analysis
Sample Contai'ner and Preservation Requirements
Target AnalY1e List and Contract Required
Detection Limits
Target Compound List and Contract Required
Quantitation Limits
Contract Laboratory Program AnalY1ical Methodologies
for Target Compound List
Contract Laboratory Program AnalY1ical Methodologies
for Target AnalY1e List
Inhalation Exposure Limits
xii
PAGE
20
21
65
103
107
109
116
117
153
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• g
u
AA
ACGIH
ARAR
ASTM
BFB
CAR
CB
CDC
CEIL
CERCLA
CLMS
CLP
coc
CPR
CRDL
CRQL
DBC
DFTPP
DHR
DOT
EM
EP
EPA
ESD
FS
FSP
TABLE OF ACRONYMS
Atomic Absorption
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
American Society for Testing and Materials
Bromofluorobenzene
Corrective Action Request
Citizen's Band
Center for Disease Control
Ceiling Limit
Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980
Computerized Laboratory Management System
Contract Laboratory Program
Chain of Custody
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Contract Required Detection Limit
Contract Required Quantitation Limit
Dibutylchlorendate
Decafluorotriphenylphosphine
Department of Human Resources
Department of Transportation
Electromagnetic
Extraction Procedure
Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Services Division
Feasibility Study
Field Sampling Plan
xiii
I
I
I GC
GC/MS
I GLP
HEPA
I HSD
HSO
I ICP
ID
I IDLH
IP
I LCS
LEL
I MEK
MS
I MSD
MSL
I NBS
NEIC
D NIOSH
NPDES
D NPL
OSHA
D OVA
PARCC
D PCB
PEL u POP
PPE
I PQAM
•
I
TABLE OF ACRONYMS (continued)
Gas Chromatography
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometer
Good Laboratory Practices
High Efficiency Particulate Air
Health and Safety Director
Site Health and Safety Officer
Inductively Coupled Plasma
Inside Diameter
Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health
Instrument Procedure
Laboratory Control Sample
Lower Explosive Limit
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
Mean Sea Level
National Bureau of Standards
National Enforcement Investigation Center
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
National Priority List
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Organic Vapor Analyzer
Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Completeness, and Comparability
Polychlorinated Biphenyl
Permissible Exposure Limit
Project Operations Plan
Personal Protective Equipment
Project Quality Assurance Manager
xiv
I
I TABLE OF ACRONYMS (continued)
I PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
I QA Quality Assurance
QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan
• QC Quality Control
RAS Routine Analytical Services
I RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
RI Remedial Investigation
g RPD Relative Percent Difference
RPM Remedial Project Manager
D RSD Relative Standard Deviation
ATP Research Triangle Park
I SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 -
SCP Standards Completion Program
I SEC Sirrine Environmental Consultants
sow Scope of Work
I SPP Sample Preparation Procedure
SR State Road
I STEL Short Term Exposure Limit
SOP Standard Operating Procedures
I SW-846 Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Wastes (EPA, 1986b)
TAL Target Analyte List
I TCE Trichloroethylene
TCL Target Compound List
I TLV Threshold Limit Value
TWA Time Weighted Average
I UEL Upper Explosive Limit
USCG United States Coast Guard
I
I xv
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT OPERATIONS PLAN ORGANIZATION
This Project Operations Plan (POP) has been prepared by Sirrine Environmental Consultants
(SEC) for the Macon/Dockery Site Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) at the
direction of the Macon/Dockery Site Steering Committee. The RI/FS is being prepared
under an Administrative . Order of Consent agreed upon between the Site Steering ,
Committee and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV in April,
1988.
The Work Plan for the Macon/Dockery site was approved by EPA Region IV following its
submittal in March, 1989 (RI/FS Work Plan, Macon/Dockery Site; C. T. Main, March, 1989).
The purpose of the POP is to provide detailed procedures for conducting the RI activities
specified in the Work Plan. The POP combines two previously separate documents, the
Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and the Field Sampling Plan (FSP), as directed by
the EPA guidance document (EPA, 1988b). General requirements of the FSP include:
Site Background
Project Objectives
• Sample Location and Frequency
• Sample Designation
Sampling Equipment and Procedures
• Sampling Handling and Analysis
Requirements of the QAPP include:
• Project Description
• Project Organization and Responsibilities
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
m
g
n
u
D
•
•
•
•
QA Objectives
Field Investigation Procedures
Sample Custody
Calibration Procedures
Analytical Procedures
Data Reduction, Validation, and Reporting
Internal Quality Control
Performance and Systems Audits
'
Preventative Maintenance
Data Assessment
Corrective Actions
In addition, the Health and Safety Plan to be used during the RI/FS effort has been included
as Section 4.0 of this document.
The POP has been prepared in accordance with the following documents:
•
•
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan (EPA, 1985a)
Guidance on Remedial Investigations Under CERCLA (EPA, 1985b)
Interim Final Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility
Studies Under CERCLA (EPA, 1988b)
EPA -Region IV Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual
(EPA, 1986c)
The POP is subject to revision throughout the investigation to accommodate each phase
of the RI process and unexpected field conditions. Any changes to POP procedures or
sampling locations will be documented in writing to the EPA-Region IV Regional Project
Manager (RPM) or his designated representative.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
g
D
D
D
D
I
I
•
I
I
I
1.2 SITE LOCATION AND HISTORY
The Charles Macon Drum and Lagoon Site and the Dockery Site, collectively referred to
as the Macon/Dockery Site, are located in Richmond County, North Carolina. The
Macon/Dockery Site is located approximately 1.6 miles southwest of Cordova, North
Carolina and 0. 76 miles east of the Pee Dee River on State Road (SR) 1103. The Mac_on
and Dockery properties are not contiguous. The Dockery property is located approximately
500 feet north of the Macon property on the west side of SR 1103 (Figure 1.1 ). The ,
combined area of the two.sites is approximately 17 acres. The Macon Site is located,at
34· 53' 30" north latitude, 79· 50' 18" west longitude,' and the Dockery Site is located at 34"
53' 52" north latitude, 79· 50' 18" west longitude.
The Macon/Dockery Site was operated as a waste oil recycling and antifreeze
manufacturing facility from 1979 to 1982. Following investigations by the North Carolina
Department of Human Resources (DHR) and EPA, the Macon/Dockery Site was placed
on the National Priorities List (NPL) in 1987. An Administrative Order by Consent between
the EPA and the Respondents, Clark Equipment Company and Crown Cork and Seal
Company, dated April 13, 1988, made provisions for a RI/FS in order to define the extent
of environmental contamination if any and to identify and evaluate remedial alternatives. A
RI/FS Work Plan for the Macon/Dockery Site was submitted by the respondents on March
27, 1989 and subsequently approved by EPA.
From 1979 to 1982, Charles Macon operated a waste oil reclamation and antifreeze
manufacturing facility at the Macon property. Drums containing waste paints, solvents,
acids.and bases were also received and stored on-site. Waste oils were collected in 11
unlined lagoons on the Macon property and one unlined lagoon on the Dockery property.
3
I
D
D
D
D
D SCALE 1:24 000
1•• ~I \ • , .
.... -~66ij~~1::::J.. ..... ; /\ .
~
.
(.-..':"" I ( - . j ·_ . .··,··.f,--_ _;..-.· ...
1==3=::::E===l=::E:3:~ ========EO ========================'31 MIL[
m . CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
I
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
1111•SIRRINE 111■•■ ENVIRONMENTAL m CONSULTANTS
II Greenvl I le, South Carolina
Figure 1.1
Location Map
II ~--.....___ ___ ...___ ___ ____.
I
I
•
m
I
I
I
0
n
D
D
I
m
• •
I
I
I
I
The Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch first inspected the site in the fall of
1980. The details of subsequent investigations and actions by both OHR ,:ind the EPA are
detailed in Section 1.3 of the Macon/Dockery Site Work Plan, March, 1989 .. The Work Plan
also provides details of quantities and types of waste materials removed from the site during
clean-up operations completed in January, 1984.
1.3 SITE DESCRIPTION
1.3.1 General Information
For the purposes of this investigation, the Macon and Dockery Sites have been
divided into the upper and lower Macon Sites and the upper and lower Dockery
Sites. The upper site in each case is located adjacent to SR 1103 near the
topographic ridge east of the sites. The lower site in each case is located
topographically downgradient and west of the upper site.
The Macon and Dockery properties are not contiguous. The Dockery property is
located approximately 500 feet north of the Macon property on the west side of SR
1103. The Dockery Site is wooded with few cleared areas. One lagoon as well as
several drum disposal areas were located at this site. A single unpaved road provides
access to the site from SR 1103. Aerial photographs indicate that drums were
deposited from SR 1103 west along the access road for approximately 600 to 700
feet. The lagoon on the Dockery Site was located about 2,400 feet west of SR 1103.
The single lagoon was unlined and open areas around the lagoon were used for drum
storage .
The Macon property is approximately 60% wooded. Several cleared areas are present
where buildings, lagoons, and drum disposal areas were located. The majority of oil
reclamation activity occurred on the east side of the property adjacent to the SR. Two
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
u
0
H
D
D
I
I
m
I
I
I
lagoons were located in a cleared area on the southwest side of the property. Three
empty and apparently unused lagoons were located in the central portion of the lower
Macon site adjacent to an orchard.
1.3.2 General Site Physiography/Geology
The site is located on the western margin of the Sandhills Region of the Atlantic
Coastal Plain. The topography in this area is generally smooth with extensive gently
rolling interstream areas (Figure 1.1). Along the Pee Dee River, the topography
becomes more rugged with deeply dissected stream valleys where tributaries flow into
the river.
The Macon/Dockery Site slopes moderately from a ridge toward the Pee Dee River
from an approximate elevation of 275 feet mean sea level (MSL) near and parallel
to SR 1103 to approximately 160 feet MSL at the western boundary of the sites. A
broad, flat alluvial plain approximately 2,000 feet wide is located about 1,000 feet west
of the site adjacent to the Pee Dee River.
Surface water on the Macon Site drains to the west. Water which exits the northern
portion of the site enters either a pond located west of the site or an unnamed first
order tributary to Solomons Creek. Water exiting the southern portion of the site is
' expected to directly enter Solomons Creek. Solomons Creek enters the Pee Dee
River approximately two miles downstream from where site runoff would be expected
to enter Solomons Creek.
Surface runoff from the Dockery Site exits the site via numerous gullies and
intermittent streams. Water leaving the northern portion of the site enters a westward
flowing first order tributary to the Pee Dee River. The tributary enters the Pee Dee
River approximately one mile west of the site. Water leaving the southern portion of
6
I
I
I
I
m
I
m
D
D
D
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
the site enters the same unnamed tributary to Solomons Creek as water leaving the
northern portion of the Macon Site. Water from the Dockery Site enters the tributary
approximately one-half mile upstream from the Macon Site.
The site is located on the western margin of the Sandhills region of the Inner Coastal
Plain Physiographic Province. The Sandhills region is characterized by deep sandy
soil, rolling topography, and the highest elevations in the Coastal Plain. The lithology,
as indicated by its name, consists of r~latively horizontal, interfingered marine deposits
which slope approximately 15 feet per mile eastward toward the Atlantic Ocean. The
Cretaceous Age Middendorf Formation crops out at the site. More detailed geologic
information is presented in the Macon/Dockery Work Plan.
Ground water at the Macon/Dockery Site is mainly derived from infiltration of
precipitation through the soil. Ground water exists in primary pore spaces within the
upper sediments and lower weathered residuum. The depth to ground water ranges
from approximately 27 feet below surface at well MW-1, east of SR 1103 on the upper
Macon site, to about 37 feet in well MW-4. Many domestic water wells in the vicinity
of the site are less than 70 feet deep.
1.4 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The limited investigations of the Macon/Dockery Site to date have not adequately
determined the extent of potential contamination of soils and ground water. The objective
of the RI is to obtain the additional data necessary to characterize the site and determine
potential risks to human health and the environment. The objective of the FS is to evaluate
the results of the RI and provide a basis for selection of a cost effective remedial action that
is protective of human health and the environment.
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
0
D
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
Based on the data collected, the objectives of the RI are to:
Determine the nature and extent of soil contamination, if any, .
• Determine the surficial or buried presence of any remaining drums or other
containerized waste materials,
• Determine the nature and extent of ground water contamination, if any,
Determine the potential mechanisms for off-site transportation of contamination,
Identify potential receptors and analyze the predicted impact of contaminatfon
'
on off-site receptors,
Identify potential areas for remediation .
Specific tasks will include sampling of soils, ground water, surface water, and streambed
sediment plus a geologic and a hydrogeologic assessment of the site and surrounding
areas.
The RI field investigations will be conducted in a series of phases to allow for adequate
evaluation of data collected in each step and for refinement of proposed sampling locations
and analytical parameters. To provide better overall source characterization and assist in
expediting the RI effort within the required schedule, certain sampling activities originally
designated for Phase II have been coupled with previous Phase I Work Plan activities. The
Phase I investigation will consist of a source area characterization, an initial hydrogeologic
assessment, surface soil, groundwater, surface water and streambed sediment sampling .
The Phase I activities consist of both source area characterization and media-specific
investigations. A surface geophysical survey will be conducted to locate possible buried
metallic material such as drums or tanks. Direct source area sampling will be conducted
in former lagoon areas to evaluate the potential for residual waste materials. Addition'al
surficial soil sample collection will be conducted in areas where waste storage is suspected.
An initial evaluation of hydrogeologic conditions will be conducted to aid in the Phase II
hydrogeologic investigation. Surface water and streambed sediment samples will also be
8
I
I
I
•
m
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
collected during Phase I to evaluate possible contaminant transport pathways.
Characterization analyses, including the designated Target Compound List (TCL) and Target
Analyte List (TAL) parameters, will be conducted on Phase I samples as. outlined in the
approved Work Plan. Results from the Phase I Characterization analyses will be used to
develop a proposed list of indicator parameters to be used for analyses of the Phase II
samples. The indicator parameters list will consist of TCL/TAL parameters detected 1in
Phase I samples. The primary field activities to be conducted during Phase II consist of
monitoring well installation· and ground wat~r sampling. The objectives and major elements
of each phase are outlined below.
Objectives of the Phase I Field Investigations are:
Investigate the potential presence of residual sources of contamination at the
site,
• Characterize residual sources of contamination which may be present,
Provide an initial assessment of the horizontal extent of residual sources and soil
contamination which may be present at the site,
Develop a set of site-specific indicator parameters for use during subsequent
sampling and analyses,
• Provide initial characterization of the geology and hydrogeology of the site to
guide subsequent assessment efforts,
• Provide an initial assessment of the potential presence of ground water
contamination resulting from former activities at the site,
• Characterize the nature of ground water contamination which may be present
and ground water flow directions at the site,
• Provide an initial assessment of potential surface water and
streambed sediment transport pathways.
9
I
I
I
I
I
n
D
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Phase I Field Activities will include:
•
•
•
Development of a site base map,
A surface geophysical survey to identify potential buried disposal areas,
Initial source characterization in the former lagoon areas,
Collection of surface soil samples from suspected waste disposal/storage areas,
Collection of surface water and sediment samples from streams and ponds
located downgradient from the site,
•
Collection of any liquids and/or waste material from existing tanks,
A survey of private water wells in the vicinity of the site to determine, location,
use, and present condition,
Rehabilitation of the existing site monitoring wells,
Installation of initial ground water monitoring wells for ground water sampling
and water level measurements,
• Hydraulic conductivity testing of the upper aquifer.
Objectives of the Phase II Field Investigation are:
• Characterize the horizontal extent of any residual sources or soil contamination
identified during the Phase I field . investigation to the extent required for the
assessment of remedial alternatives,
• Investigate the extent of residual sources and soil contamination which may be
present,
• Investigate the extent and nature of ground water contamination which may be
present,
• Gather additional data sufficient to support the assessment and feasibility of any
required remedial alternatives.
10
I
I
I
I
• g
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Phase II Field Investigations will include:
Sampling and analysis of ground water from appropriate privaJe wells,
Excavation of soil borings in the former lagoon areas with documented residual
contamination as needed to define vertical migration,
Installation of additional ground water monitoring wells for more detailed
assessment of site hydrogeology and the extent of contamination,
Hydraulic testing (pumping test) of the site surficial aquifer. ,
1.5 PROJECT SCHEDULE
The estimated schedule for completion of the RI/FS is presented in Figure 1.2. Time zero
of the schedule coincides with EPA approval of the site POP. Implementation of the RI/FS
has been divided into discrete tasks to indicate the coordination of parallel and consecutive
elements through completion of the project. Descriptions of the tasks are provided in the
Macon/Dockery Site Work Plan. Procedures for implementing specific tasks are described
in greater detail herein.
1.6 PROJECT ORGANIZATION
The overall project management organization for the Macon/Dockery Site RI/FS is shown
on Figure 1.3. Overall administrative responsibility for completion of the RI/FS is centered
around the SEC project manager. The RI and FS project supervisors will be directly
responsible for the coordination and implementation of these respective elements of the
project.
CompuChem Laboratories, Inc. will be the analytical contractor for this project. Analyses
will be performed at CompuChem's laboratory located at Research Triangle Park (ATP),
North Carolina.
11
FIGURE 1.2
SCHEDULE FDR Macon/Dockery Site Remedial lnvestlgatlon/Feaslblllty Study
JOB NO. G-9068 DATE 6-89 BY PAS/JAW ---
TASK 1 PRELIMINARY ACTIVITIES
EPA Anrvoval of POP/H&S Plan
Site Mao Prncaration
TASK 2 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
Phase I Field Investigation
Data Analysis and Review
EPA Aporovel of Indicator Parameters
Phase II Field lnvestioation
Data Analysis 81'1d Review
RI Draft Aemrt Pra~"-tion
Review of Draft Aennrt
RI Final Report Preparation
Review of RI Final Rennrt
EPA Approval of Final Al Report
TASK 3 FEASIBILITY STUDY
Review of RI Results
Develop Remediation Guida6nes
Screenino of Alternatives
Treatabilirv Studies
Detailed Alternative Anelvsls
Draft FS Report Preparation
Review of Draft FS
Second Draft FS Re..,,,_rt
Review ol Second Draft FS
AeYised FS Report
ROD Issued
Final FS Re.....,rt
1111!!!1 11!1!11! 1111!!1!1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
-
-
----
........
=-I
I
-.... .... w
Completion of the activities within the projected schedule is contingent upon favorable weather and site conditions, sub-contractor availability
and performance, and timely review by EPA of submitted materials.
23
1!11!!!!!1 == liiiiil iiii - -----
24
- - -
--- ---- - - - --l!!!l!!!I == liiiiiiil liiiil liiiiiil --
U.S. EPA, IV
Remedial Project Manager
J.S. Nohrstedt
MACON/DOCKERY
PRP STEERING COMMITTEE
-
SEC SEC SEC
Quality Assurance Coordinator Health & Safety Coordinator Project Manager
E.V. Zillioux, Ph.D. G .A. Peterson, P.E. -B.G. Davis
SEC SEC
RI Project Supervisor FS Project Supervisor
P.A. Shirley, P.G. D.L. Hargett, Ph.D.
COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES SEC
Analytical Lab Project Manager -On-Site Coordinator(s)
K.R. Roberts -Field Geologists -Technicians
IfrW ■SIRRINE FIGURE 1.3 ::::::::::::: ~;:=-.:::~)~ - -. ':':'::::,:,:w,0.. . . -PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART
'"'''''°''''"""''''''' ENVIRONMENTAL MACON/DOCKERY SITE RI/FS :······•·····~i;i ■ CONSULTANTS
RICHMOND COUNTY, NC
-. ·--.. -----. --
I
I
I
I
I
g
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The key individuals responsible for implementation of the RI/FS and their responsibilities
are listed below:
Project Manager -Gordon A. Peterson, P.E., Manager of Hydrogeology and Remediation
Department, SEC, Inc.
The project manager will provide both senior technical oversight and coordination of the
overall project. This individual will be the, primary contact for the Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs) and will be responsible for all technical elements of the effort as well as
project costs.
The project manager:
• Reviews and approves field operating procedures,
• Provides senior technical oversight and coordination of the overall project,
• Assures that approved procedures meet Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control
(QC) objectives of project,
Coordinates RI/FS Study activities with Coordinator,
• Responsible for implementation of recommendations made by the QA
Coordinator,
Coordinates the activities of the RI and FS project supervisors.
RI Project Supervisor -Patrick A. Shirley, P.G., Manager of Hydrogeology Section, SEC,
Inc.
The RI Project Supervisor will be directly responsible for the coordination and
implementation of all RI activities. This individual reports to the SEC Project Manager and
14
I
I
I
I
•
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
will direct the technical elements of the RI field investigation. He will coordinate directly vyith
the EPA RPM or his designated representative on project modifications required by field
conditions encountered.
The RI project manager's responsibilities include:
• RI staffing, sc~eduling, and cost control
• Subcontractor management
• Day to day technical coordination between the project management team and
field personnel for RI field activities
Technical oversight of RI
Coordination between Health and Safety Coordinator and field personnel
FS Proiect Supervisor -David L. Hargett, Ph.D., Assistant Manager of Hydrogeology and
Remediation Department, SEC, Inc.
The FS Project Supervisor will be directly responsible for the coordination and
implementation of all FS activities. This individual reports to the SEC Project Manager and
will direct the technical efforts associated with the FS.
The FS project manager's responsibilities include:
• FS staffing, scheduling, and cost control
Subcontractor management (treatability testing, if necessary)
• Coordination with State of North Carolina regulatory personnel
• Development and screening of potential remedial action alternatives
Technical review of all documents and interim reports
15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
Health and Safety Coordinator -Edward E. Zillioux, Ph.D., Manager of Toxicology, Risk
Assessment and Industrial Hygiene Department, SEC, Inc.
The project Health and Safety Coordinator will play a primary role in the development of the
Health and Safety Plan along with coordinating required instruction and safety
documentation. Overall responsibility for the risk assessment and chemical hazard
characterization of the public health evaluation will also be assigned to this individual.
QA Coordinator -Robert G. Davis, Corporate QC Officer, SEC, Inc.
The QA Coordinator, who reports directly to the president of SEC, will be responsible for
all procedures and tasks pertaining to QA for this study.
Specific responsibilities of the QA Coordinator include:
• Monitoring project activities to verify compliance with QA plans
Implementing routine QA audits for all technical deliverables
• Preparation and review of all corporate QNQC guidance documents
1.7 SITE MANAGEMENT
Mr. Patrick A. Shirley, RI Project Supervisor, is directly responsible for all field activities at
the Macon/Dockery Site. He will be involved in the initial mobilization activities and will
maintain daily contact with field personnel during the course of the project.
An on-site coordinator will be selected by the Project Manager and RI Project Supervisor
for each task or set of tasks that will be performed concurrently during the RI. The on-
site coordinator will manage field operations and is responsible for implementation of health
and safety procedures, restricting site access during the course of the work, and utility
16
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
g
D
D
D
m
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
clearances. The on-site coordinator will report directly to the RI project supervisor and
interact directly with the project health and safety coordinator. The on-site. coordinator will
generally be the project field hydrogeologist who will also be directly responsible for data
collection activities. The on-site coordinator will be familiar with all aspects of the POP and
will confirm sampling activities and locations with the RI project supervisor.
Experienced technicians will be utilized for support activities including equipment
decontamination and field'calibration, ope~ation of field screening instrumentation, sample
packaging and shipment, and assistance with documentation of field activities.
A temporary office will be established on-site during field investigation activities. The office
will house project files, field equipment, and samples awaiting transport to the analytical
laboratory. The office will be locked during any absence by field personnel. The office will
provide communications capabilities for on-site personnel and will allow more effective
management of field investigation activities by helping office managers expedite equipment
and personnel to the site. The office will be especially valuable as a Health/Safety staging
area prior to site entry or after complete decontamination during field activities and will
provide immediate emergency communication capabilities.
17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.0 FIELD SAMPLING PLAN
2.1 OVERVIEW
The RI of the Macon/Dockery site will be conducted to determine and document the
presence or absence, general extent, and chemical nature of residual contamination which
may be present and to investigate the potential migration of contaminants off site. The
results of this study will be used to evaluate the necessity for further remedial action at this
site and to support the selection and design of remedial alternatives if required. If
contamination is confirmed, public health impacts will also be evaluated.
The FSP for the Macon/Dockery Site provides the framework for the implementation of the
' data gathering tasks associated with the approved Work Plan. The tasks described in· the
Work Plan provide the basis for the types of general activities and sampling locations
further delineated in this FSP. Based on subsequent site inspections and discussions with
EPA Region IV some of the general information presented in the Work Plan has been
refined to provide the most appropriate technical methods for developing a consistent and
complete RI database. The sampling objectives and sampling locations outlined in the
Work Plan provide the basis for the efforts described in the subsequent FSP.
As described previously, the sampling efforts and field testing will be conducted in two
separate phases. The actual numbers of specific media samples will be dependent on
certain site specific conditions such as depth to ground water, depth to target geologic
units, the percent recovery obtained from sampling devices, etc. Specific criteria for
sample selection and frequency have been included for each sampling method described.
Should actual field conditions or observations made during field activities differ from the
assumptions of the original Work Plan the RPM will be contacted with this information and
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
appropriate modifications can be agreed upon before further work proceeds. The number
of sampling locations originally proposed in the Work Plan is summarized in Tables 2.1 and
2.2 for the individual phases. Samples collected during the RI will be S(!bjected to field
screening and/or laboratory analyses. All laboratory chemical analyses will be conducted
by an active participant in the EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). Sample collection
procedures and protocols will be in general accordance with EPA's (EPA, 1986) procedu~es
manual. Any modifications or changes to the procedures described herein will be
documented or in the field log book and will be documented to the EPA RPM.
'
2.1.1 Data Quality Objectives
Data Quality Objectives (DOOs) are based on the concept that different data uses
may require different data quality. Three levels of analy1ical data quality, as
summarized on Table 4-3 of the EPA DOO document (EPA, 1987a), will be generated
and utilized during the Macon/Dockery RI. A brief description of each analy1ical level
and its respective application is provided below:
•
Level I (screening): this analy1ical data quality level is acceptable for
general site characterization and health and safety monitoring during
implementation of field activities. Organic vapor analyzers (OVAs) will be
utilized for health and safety monitoring and sample screening during
sample collection activities for this project.
Level Ill; this analy1ical data quality level employs analy1ical methods o)her
than those specified in the CLP (RAS) Routine Analy1ical Services. This
level does employ EPA-approved procedures, such as those in SW-846
(EPA, 198Gb). Some Level Ill procedures may be equivalent to CLP MS
with the exception of the ex1ensive CLP required documentation.
19
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2.1
SUMMARY OF PHASE I RI FIELD ACTIVITIES
Activity Quantity
Existing Monitoring Wells 3
New Monitoring Wells 4
Surface Soil Samples 26
Source Characterization Samples 12
Test Pits 12
Soil Boring •
Surface Water Samples 7
Streambed Sediment Samples 7
Slug Tests 4
Tank Samples ••
• Number of locations dependent on analytical results of test pit characterization
samples.
•• Actual number of locations will be determined by the number of tanks identified,
accessibility, and presence of waste material.
20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2.2
SUMMARY OF PHASE II RI FIELD ACTIVITIES
Activity
New Monitoring Wells
New Pumping Test Wells
Monitoring Well Soil Boring Samples
Private Well Samples
Slug Tests
Pumping Test
Surface Water Samples (if required)
Streambed Sediment Samples (if required}
Quantity
14
2
12
*
8
1
2
2
* Actual number of locations will be determined by the number of wells identified, their
hydrogeologic relationship to the Macon/Dockery site, accessibility, and integrity.
21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Level IV (conformational); this analytical data quality level requires full CLP
analytical and data validation procedures. This quality of data is suitable
for the evaluation and design of remedial alternativ~s and for risk
assessment. To meet the objectives. of this RI/FS, samples of surface
water, sediment, soil, and ground water subjected to laboratory analysis
during this study will be analyzed in accordance with CLP protocols.
2.1.2 RI Sample Handling and Analytical Requirements
The RI field investigation will be conducted in two primary phases, and several sub-
phases, to allow for adequate evaluation of data collected in each step and, for
refinement of proposed sampling locations and analytical parameters. The analytical
program proposed for the Macon Dockery site RI field investigation includes ground
water, surface water, streambed sediment, and soils analyses.
Sample locations and collection procedures for each media are described in Sections
2.3 through 2.7 of this POP. These procedures have been developed based upon
EPA (EPA, 1987b, EPA, 1986b) and EPA Region IV (EPA, 1986c) guidance
documents. Sample handling and Chain-of-Custody (COC) procedures have also
been developed for this project based upon these same guidance documents. These
procedures are described in Section 2.12, Sample Chain of Custody. Analytical
methods, and preservation, container, and holding time requirements for this project
will be in accordance with the appropriate sections of the CLP Inorganic and Organic
Statements of Work (EPA, 1987c, and EPA, 1988a, respectively), or SW-846 (EPA,
1986b). These method-specific requirements applicable to this project are described
below in Sections 3.2 (Sampling Quality Assurance) and 3.4 (Analytical Procedures).
Since all source characterization type samples are being collected in Phase I the
Work Plan requires the use of the TCL and TAL parameter lists. To avoid processing
22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Phase II samples for analytical fractions not identified at the site these initial results
I
will be reviewed prior to Phase II.
The results of chemical analyses conducted during the initial.phase of the RI (Phase
I) will be used to develop a set of indicator parameters which will be used for
I
subsequent analyses conducted during the RI. Indicator chemicals will represent the
major analytical fractions identified in the Pha~e I source characterization. This list:will
be submitted to the EPA RPM an9 finalized prior to subsequent sampling and
analyses.
Samples which will be used to develop the Macon/Dockery Phase II site-specific list
of indicator parameters are:
•
•
Ground water samples (7) collect.ed from existing monitoring wells MW-
1, MW-2, and MW-4, and new wells MW-10, MW-11, MW-12, and MW-19
(Figures 2.1 and 2.2),
Soil samples taken from test pi
1
ts excavated in former lagoon areas
(Figures 2.1 and 2.2),
Surficial soil samples taken from areas of the site suspected of being used
for waste storage,
' Surface water and streambed sediment samples collect from potential
'
transport pathways at site borders.
QC samples will be collected during the entire field sampling program. Field blank,
sampler rinsate blanks, trip blanks, and split and duplicate samples will be collected
I '
as part of the QC program for this project. A'. discussion of the purpose of these QC
I
samples and the criteria for their collection is presented in Section 3. 7.1.
23
..
MW-14
M 4 -_ MW 13
"
)
\_ MW-13A
LEGEND
~ WJods Line
f PONO
-,'-New Monitoring \-\bll
O Lagoon
Road
~ Test Pit +-_ Exi!}ting ~19nitoring _Well
.. ..
Unusod
L.1uoons
--liiilll
\
MW-8A
liiil
s,,,.,, c., .. .,_.,,1 c,.,,11 .. ,,. ,,.
.. iiiil
DRAWING TITLE
Monitoring· Well and
Test Pit Location Map
Macon Site
SEC DRAWING NlJ~B[A
Figure 2.1
iiiil
liil --llill -iiiil
-¥W-16
SCALE
0 150 >:JO
-lliiil liiill iiiil
LEGEND
~ Woods Line + New Monitoring Well
~ lagoon
Road
8 Test Pit
•••SIRRINE m.■•■ENVIRONMENTAL "" CONSULTANTS
Greenville, SotJth C<rollno
J'IL( NO.
,0 "" ~.
DRAWING TITLE
Monitoring Well and
Test Pit Location Map
Docke,y SHe
SEC DRAWING MJMB£R
(011,r ighl e Figure 2.2 s1oi" r .... ,,...,,,,1 c,,,.u ..... r ..
liiil
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Background samples will also be collected for each media being investigated ,during
I
the RI. One existing monitoring well has been designated for use as a background
well. Two streambed sediment/surface water sample locations have been designated
as background locations. Two soil samples location have been designated as a
I
background samples for comparison with other soil. samples collected on the
' Macon/Dockery site. Background data collected during the RI will be used in
I
conjunction with existing site data and available literature to establish contaminant
evaluation criteria for the Macon/Dockery site.
2.1.3 Site Security
The objectives of site security during the field investigation are as follows:
,·
Control access to the site durir;ig the RI
I
Prevent vandalism and/or theft of equipment.
Gates and fences are located at both sides which can be locked to prevent
unauthorized entry. One additional lockable gate will be added adjacent to the
' Macon site residence to provide full security. Any persons attempting to enter the
site during working hours must be authorized by the on-site coordinator and will be
requested to sign in, state his or her pu:rpose, and time of departure. Persons
wishing to enter the site during the RI should have the approval of EPA. During non-
work hours, the Richmond County Sheriff's: Department will be requested to observe
the site during their patrol.
At all times during the progress of the work, precautions shall be taken to prevent
access to monitoring wells by unauthorized personnel. Temporary measures used
to prevent access to incomplete wells which are left unattended due to construction
schedules will be documented in the field log book.
26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.2
2.1.4 Potable Water Supply
Potable water will be needed during the field investigations for equipment
decontamination, grout preparation, and drilling operations. Potable water will be
obtained from the nearest treated municipal supply, brought in by tank truck, and
stored on-site. Available sampling records will be collected for the water source prior
to its use in field activities. If deemed necessary after reviewing these records, SEC
will collect one sample for chemical analys~s prior to each of the RI phases.
2.1.5 Health and Safety Procedures
Health and safety procedures which will be implemented during the scheduled field
activities identified in this POP are described in Section 4; Macon/Dockery Site RI/FS
Health and Safety Plan.
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
2.2.1 Overview
I .
A geophysical survey will be conducted to: assist in identifying areas where tanks,
drums, other metallic vessels, or other areas of metallic debris may have been buried.
The surface geophysical survey will be conducted using electromagnetic (EM)
instrumentation, as described in EPA {198,0, Section 8.4.2.1. The EM method has
several advantages over other available geophysical techniques. Continuous readings
'
can be made along survey lines so that t~e potential for detection of subsurface
anomalies is increased. Also the equipment provides excellent flexibility to adjust
!
survey lines for physical obstructions and interferences. A Geonics Model EM-31 will
be employed for the purposes of this st1.1dy: The EM-31 generally measures the
27
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
quadrature-phase component of an induced magnetic field. The deductibility of large
metal objects by the EM-31 is enhanced by-measuring the in-phase component of the
induced magnetic field instead of the quadrature-phase component.
2.2.2 Survey Procedure
The EM-31 will be operated as follows:
1. The Mode switch will be placed in the COMP position instead of the OPER
position.
2. The COARSE and FINE compensation controls are adjusted so that a meter
deflection of 20% of full scale is obtained. This procedure, adjusting to 20%
I
of full scale rather than to zero, allows for negative readings and sudden
changes in reference levels due to a bump or other sudden movement.
3. It is recommended for Step #2 above that the Range be set at the 30 mmho/m
range. More or less sensitive positions may be employed.
4. The EM-31 is operated continuously as the operator moves from one measuring
station to the next.
The EM-31 survey will be conducted in areas of the Macon/Doc:,ery site where waste
materials were likely stored or disposed. The survey will be initiated by establishing
a baseline along one perimeter of the site with stakes set at a 50-foot spacing. At the
first baseline position, the EM-31 will be turned go· from the baseline to establish the
first survey line. Although a 50-foot grid spacing will be employed as a guideline for
the survey, more dense survey transects will be completed in highly suspect areas
(Figures 2.3 and 2.4).
28
liiil
LEGEND
~ Woods Line
~ L~goon
Road
Approximate Area
of EM-31 Survey
.. -liiil llill liiiiil lill -lliil iiiil
lilll■liSIRRINE 1■•■11 ENVIRONMENTAL
llll CONSULTANTS
f.reenvl lie, South Corol!M
DRAWING-TITLE
EM-31 Survey Area
Macon Site
SEC DRAWING MJMBER
Figure 2.3
-
"" ()
iilil
0
SCALE
,:,o DO
iilil liill -iiil liilll -
LEGEND
~ Wagg~ ~ine
0 Lagoon
Road
(2G3 Appro1drnate Aroa
at EM-31 Survey
Coo,, i~hl ©-----s, ..... i. • .,,-,,.1 c .... 1,.,.,., 1,.
111••SIRRINE II■■ ENVIRONMENTAL llll■coNsuLTANTs
Greenvl Ile, South Co..-ollno
DRAWING TITLE
EM-31 Survey Area
Dockery Site
SEC DRA•ING NUMBER
Figure 2.4
liiiiiil
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Transect distance, bearing, and instrument readings will be recorded for each transect
line. At the completion of each transect, survey results will be reviewed to determine
the necessity of additional EM-31 coverage, along and/or adjacent to the completed
transect. Careful attention will be afforded. to the presence and quantity of metallic
surface debris located along the transect line. It is anticipated that some interference
of the survey will be caused by the large amount of metallic surface debris located
at the site. The presence of surface metallic debris will be considered when analyzing
anomalous EM readings.
Neither the EM-31 nor the metal detector are required to contact the ground surface
during operation. Therefore, no field decontamination procedures are required. If it
is necessary to place the instrument(s) on the ground, the instrument(s) will be placed
on clean plastic sheeting.
2.2.3 Quality Control for Geophysical Survey
All EM field measurements will be recorded in the field log book. The survey results
will be presented based on the following information:
Survey run number
Bearing
Distance
EM reading
All survey lines will be referenced to established benchmarks located on the base
map.
31
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Prior to the start of each day of the EM survey, a background survey will be
I
conducted at a location removed from the potential source areas of the site to
establish a baseline. A fixed transect line of approximately 100-feet will be surveyed.
This same line will be surveyed at the erid of each survey day to provide quality
control of the instrument's performance. In addition, during each day of the survey,
5% of the surveyed area will be duplicated to provide additional quality control of the
EM survey equipment.
2.3 SOIL SAMPLING PROGRAM
2.3.1 Surface Soil Sampling
I
Surface soil samples will be collected fr?mi various locations at the Macon/Dockery
site where historical aerial photographs indicate that drums have been stored.
Composite soil samples will be collected. from suspect areas identified on the
photographs and from the site reconnaissance. Surface soil samples will be collected
from the general locations specified on Figures 2.5 and 2.6, as outlined in Section
I 2.2.2, Soil Sampling, of the Macon/Dockery Site Work Plan, March 1989.
2.3.2 Surface Soil Sampling Procedures
Twenty-six surface soil samples will be collected from designated suspect areas at
the Macon/Dockery site. Exact sample locations will correspond to the most visibly
• I
I
contaminated surface soils observed in that area. Most of the soil sampling locations
designated in the Work Plan are in areas where a vegetative turf is established. At
I
these locations a clean stainless steel trowel will be used to carefully remove the turf.
When the clean soil surface is exposed, a hole will be advanced to a depth of two
feet using a stainless steel hand auger. All 2uger cuttings will be collected . and
carefully placed in a glass or Teflon-coate:d siainless steel pan to be mixed (or
composited) prior to filling the sample containers.
32
I!!!!!!! ==
LEGEND
~ Woods Line
~ Lagoon
Road
+ Soll Sample Localion
Suspect Area
liiiil -.. .. -iiiiil
~ -••.-----z -
••1SIRRINE llll■ ENVIRONMENTAL II■ CONSULTANTS
Greenvl lie, South Carolln<1
DRAWING TITLE
Surface Soll Sample
Location Map
Macon Site
SEC DRAWING MJWBER
Figure 2.5
iiiiil
----II!!!!!!! l!!!!!!I liiiiil liiiil liiill
SCALE
0 150 ~
-.. ..
LEGEND
~ Woods Line
V Lagoon
Road
@ Suspect Area.
+ ·soil Sample Location
Copr, i~~l (5;<~---S""" £••"•-•••I t•ullt•II. he
liilil iiiil
•••SIRRINE !•■■·ENVIRONMENTAL .., CONSULTANTS
Groonvl I le, South Corollno
ORAWHJG TITLE
-S.,rface Spi I -Sample
Location Map
Dockery Site
SEC DRAWING M.IMBER
Figure 2.6
iiiiil
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
D
D
m
I
Sample mixing will be performed immediately after the auger hole is complete. A
i stainless steel spoon will be used for mixing.1 The soil will be scraped from the sides,
corners, and bottom of the pan, rolled to the middle of the pan, arid gently mixed.
The sample will then be quartered and separated into the four corners of the mixing
pan. When the soil has been thoroughly mixed and is as homogeneous as possible
it will be divided and placed in the appropri~te sample containers (Section 3.2).
Each sample container will be carefully filled as full as possible to eliminate free air
space. The container may be gently tapped': during the procedure to assist in filling
each jar completely. Surface soil samples collected during Phase I of the RI will be
analyzed for the TAL parameters.
2.3.3 Test Pits/Subsurface Soil Sampling -Potential Source Areas
Source area characterization will be conduct~d in several former lagoon areas in, an
effort to detect any residual source material. During the early field effort, the location
of the former lagoons will be delineated based upon available aerial photographs.
Subsurface soil samples will be collected using one or a combination of two methods.
Both test pits and soil borings will be utilized, as appropriate, to characterize the
quality of soil in potential source areas. Test pits will serve to characterize the levels
of contamination in the upper 1 O feet. Where :significant contamination is confirmed,
I soil borings will then be utilized to define the _vertical distribution at locations below
10 feet. Test pits (EPA, 1987c, section 8.2) will:be excavated in these areas to enable
both visual observation and sample collection of the subsurface material. Test pits
proposed for Phase I are particularly applicable to the Macon/Dockery RI due to the
absence of well-defined waste management area boundaries. The use of soil borings
only would increase the potential for missing ,the actual waste management areas.
Soil borings will be utilized in the Phase II inv~stigation to assess the vertical extent
35
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
0
D
m
contaminated areas where residual contamination is confirmed. Subsurface soils
I
samples will be collected from the locations specified on Figures 2.5 and 2.6.
' : '
2.3.4 Test Pit Excavation and Sampling Procedures :
Test pits will be excavated to provide initi~I source characterization in and around
the former lagoon areas. The objective ot' source characterization is to determine
I
the potential presence and concentrations of residual contaminants, if any, at each
' of the designated lagoon areas. This information will be used primarily to evaluate
alternatives for source control. Test pits' will allow sampling and direct visual
characterization of any residual wastes which may be present and assessment of
I
former lagoon conditions. i
A total of 12 test pits will be excavated during the RI (Figures 2.1 and 2.2). The
I proposed test pits will be excavated during Phase I to collect samples which will be
I
used to develop the site-specific indicator parameter list. Additional test pits may be
excavated during Phase II based upon the electromagnetic survey results. One
composite soil sample will be selected for TCLJTAL analysis from each test pit.
The test pits will be excavated with a standard backhoe in accordance with EPA
Superfund field investigation guidelines (EPA, 1987b). The final orientations and
dimensions of test pits will be determined in t.he field based on observed conditions.
Minimum test pit dimensions will be approximately 12 feet x 4 feet x 10 feet (length
X width X depth).
I
Four grab samples will be collected from the natural soils excavated from each
test pit. For sample parameters other than volatile organics, the grab samples
from each test pit will be combined in the field by mixing in a glass or stainless
steel pan to form one composite sample from each test pit for analysis. The
I
36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
D
I
grab samples will be combined by mixing with a stainless steel spoon as
described in Section 4.6.3.3.4 of the Region IV SOPQAM (EPA, 1986c). A
discrete volatile organic sample will be collected from each test pit prior to the
other samples to minimize volatilization of organics. All rocks, twigs,· or foreign
'
debris will be removed from the sample prior to homogenizing.
'
All samples collected from the test pits shall be selected from the most heavily
contaminated soils exposed in each test pit, based on the results of screening ~ith . ' '
an OVA and visual assessment. The samples will be carefully selected from the
material removed by the backhoe to assure t~at material which has come into contact
with the backhoe bucket is not included. In:addition, soil selected for sampling· will
be trimmed with a stainless steel or Teflon s9oop prior to final sample collection. A
separate stainless steel scoop will then be used to collect the sample.
Soil samples collected from the test pits excavated during Phase I will be
subjected to TCL/TAL analyses.
Each test pit will be described in the field log book. Data recorded will include:
'
•
•
•
•
Date of excavation
Approximate surface elevation
Total depth of excavation
Dimensions of pit
Method of sample acquisition
Type and size of samples
• Soil and lithologic descriptions
Ground water occurrence
Organic vapor readings
' • Other pertinent information, such as waste material encountered
I
37
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
D
I
I
I
Final test pit lithologic logs will be typed on the form included as Figure 2.7.
'
After logging, each test pit will be pho)ographed and backfilled. The
approximate location and orientation of each test pit will be plotted on the field
plan and the location will be staked for future reference.
'
2.3.5 Soil Boring Sc1mpling -Potential Source Areas
Soil borings will be conducted to characterize potential source areas vertically '
if necessary based upon the results of the soil samples collected from test pits.
For test pit locations in Phase I that do not present a risk to human health and
'
the environment, no further characterization will be conducted. If contamination
of concern is confirmed in the soil samples, collected from a test pit, a soil
boring will be conducted immediately adjacent to the pit. The boring will be
i
sampled at five-foot intervals from the bottom; of the test pit to the water table.
All samples will be transported to the analytical laboratory for potential analyses.
Analyses of the samples will be conducted of each sample in vertical succession until
two consecutive samples are determined to be below or near the quantitation limit.
Based upon the presence of waste material arid a underlying synthetic liner in lagoon
10, soil borings through the lagoon may not be advisable. Following the initial test
pit excavation in lagoon 10, an evaluation will:be made regarding the necessity and
appropriate methods for further investigation ~eneath the lagoon liner.
38
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
0
I
SIRRINE
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSUL TAN TS
PROJECT:
CLIENT:
CONTRACTOR:
EQUIPMENT USED:
SAMPLE
DEPTH NOJ STllATA
(FT) DEPTH CHANGE
RANGE (FT)
- -
--
L--
L... -
~ -
~ -
L -
GROUND WATER
DATE TIME•
NOT ENCOUNTERED T
FIGUR.E 2.7
' TEST PIT REP'ORT TEST PIT NO.
i
I JOB NO:
LOCATION:
' ELEVATION:
DATE START:
DATE ANISH:
' LOGGED BY: I
'
FIELD CLASSIFICATION· REMARKS
'
' I
,
'
:
'
I
:
I
'
I
'
I
I
'
'
'
'
I
'
i AS1MCOMPONENT%.
I
50 -100 o/. MOSTLY
' SOME 30-45%
LITTLE 15-25 %
FEW 5-10 %
TRACE <5%
PIT DIMENSIONS (Fl)
DEPTH FT. X I X = CU.FT.
(L) (~ (0)
' BOULDERS
12 INCH TO 18 INCH OIAM: NO. = VOL. CU.FT.
OVER 18 INCH DIAM: NO. = VOL. CU.FT.
I • HRS. AFTER ITEST PIT NO. COMPLETION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
D
I
2.3.6 Soil Boring Sampling Procedures
The exact number of subsurface soil samples to be collected fron:, potential
source areas is unknown at this time and dependent on the results of test pit
sample analyses. Generally, the sampling 1procedure to be used to collect
subsurface soil samples from borings is in accordance with ASTM D1587-74
I
and will be performed as follows:
A borehole will be advanced using hollow stem augers to a depth of fifteen feet. At
this point, a stainless steel split spoon will b~ driven into the undisturbed soil below
the augers. These auger advancement and stainless steel split spoon sampling
techniques will be performed as described above at five-foot depth intervals from ,the I
bottom of the test pit to the top of the water table.
'
Immediately after removing the stainless steel ~plit spoon from the ground, the sample
will be withdrawn from the spoon using a stainless steel spoon. A portion of the
'
sample will be collected immediately for volarne organic analyses. As the remainder
of the sample is removed from the spoon, it will be placed in a glass or Teflon-coated
stainless steel pan to be mixed prior ·to filling I the sample containers.
Sample mixing will be performed immediately, after removal from the stainless steel I
split spoon. A stainless steel spoon will be us¢d for mixing. The soil will be scraped
I '
from the sides, corners, and bottom of the p~n, rolled to the middle of the pan and
gently mixed. The sample will then be quartered and separated into the four corners
: of the mixing pan. Each quarter of the sample, will be mixed individually following the
I same procedures outlined above. Each quarter will then be rolled into the center of
the mixing pan; and gently mixed again.
40
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
D
E
I
I
I
I
When the soil sample has been thoroughly mixed and is as homogeneous as
possible, it will be divided and placed in: the appropriate sampl~ containers as
described in Section 3.2. Each sample container will be carefully. filled as full as
I I
possible to eliminate free air space. The container may be gently tapped during this
procedure to assist in filling each jar completely.
2.3.7 Soil Boring Sampling -Monitoring WeHs
During the installation of ground water monitoring wells in Phase II, subsurface soils
i
samples will be collected for chemical analys,es. Soil samples will be collected from
the boreholes of Phase II monitoring wells MW-2A, MW-6, MW-7, MW-BA, MW-9, MW-
11A, MW-13A, MW-14, MW-15, MW-16, MW-17, and 18 (Figures 2.1 and 2.2).
2.3.8 Soil Boring Sampling Procedures -Monitoring Wells
'
Subsurface soil samplers will be collected usi~g stainless steel split spoon samplers
at five-foot intervals. The soil borings, upon completion, will be used for the
installation of Phase II ground water monitoring wells. Prior to sampling any
vegetative turf will be carefully removed using \a stainless steel trowel. When a clean
soil surface is exposed, a stainless steel split ~peon will be driven 24-inches into the
ground using the drill rig.
Soil sampling will be conducted at five-foot intervals in the Phase II monitoring well
test borings. The samples will be collected at alternating five-foot intervals for
I
chemical analyses and lithologic description. T~is sampling sequence will extend from
the land surface to the water table. Samples 'tor lithologic analyses will continue to
'
the depth of the boring at five-foot intervals. This sampling sequence is necessary
due to the lack of sufficient sample volume 'trom a split spoon within a five-foot
interval for complete TCL/TAL analyses. Due to the non-cohesive nature of tl:le
41
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
sediments expected at the Macon-Dockery ·site, sample recovery may become an
' '
additional volume limiting problem. Further, these borings are located outside of the
potential source areas, therefore, significant residual source material in the unsaturated
' I ' soils is unlikely. '
Following collection, all samples will be transported to the laboratory for processing.
I
Complete analysis will be conducted for the two initial samples from a particular
location. If results of these samples indicate that parameter concentrations are below
' or slightly above the quantitation limit, the remainder of samples from that boring will
not be processed. If only discrete analyti~al fractions are found, these will' be
evaluated until the criteria is met. If the res\Jlts of these samples do not meet this
criteria, additional samples will be processed sequentially until two consecutive
samples are below or slightly above the quahtitation limit.
Immediately after removing the stainless steef split spoon from the ground, the
I
sample will be withdrawn from the spoon using a stainless steel spoon. A
portion of the sample will be collected immediately for volatile organic analyses.
As the remainder of the sample is removed fr.om the spoon it will be placed in
' a glass or Teflon-coated stainless steel pan to be mixed prior to filling the
sample containers.
I Sample mixing will be performed immediately after removal from the stainless steel
split spoon. A stainless steel spoon will be used for mixing. The soil will be scraped
from the sides, corners, and bottom of the pan, rolled to the middle of the pan and ' ' gently mixed. The sample will then be quartered and separated into the four corners
' ' of the mixing pan. Each quarter of the sample will be mixed individually following the
' same procedures outlined above. When the soil sample has been thoroughly mixed
and is as homogenous as possible, it will be 1divided and placed in the appropri~te
sample containers as described in Section 3.2.
42
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Each sample container will be carefully filled as full as possible to eliminate free air
space. The container may be gently tapped during this procedure to assist in filling
each jar completely.
2.3.9 Sampling Personnel and Equipment
The following field personnel will direct and complete soil sampling activities as
detailed above:
On-site Coordinator/Field Hydrogeolog_ist
Field/office liaison
Technician
Confirmation of excavation; and sampling locations
Test pit logging
Soil boring logging
Overall technical oversight ;
Subcontractor coordination.
Health and safety screening
Assistance with record keeping
Sample packaging and shipment
The equipment required for the described tasks includes:
• Backhoe (test pits only)
• Drill rig and equipment
• Decontamination equipment and supplies
Field logbook
• Camera
43
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• OVA
• Health and safety equipment
•
•
Sample containers
Stainless steel or Jeflon sampling scoops
Glass or stainless steel mixing bowls
Camera
2.3.10 Soil Sampling Equipmen\ Decontamination
i
. I
Large equipment and drilling tools will be cle~ned in areas specifically designate~ for
this purpose. These areas will be located in existing shallow depressions or will be
isolated by the construction of perimeter berms to contain wash water which will be
allowed to percolate into the soil. i Decontamination sites will be located in areas
where near surface soils are expected to be contaminated based on preliminary .
I source characterization efforts. The boundaries of decontamination areas will be
surveyed and included on the final site plan! Prior to arrival on-site, all down-hole
'
drilling equipment and the backhoe bucket will be sandblasted.
I
Equipment used for test pit excavation, drilling, monitoring well installation and I
development, or hydraulic testing will be cleaned and handled in accordance with
the following guidelines: 1
1.
2.
Backhoes, drill rigs, and all support equipment shall be free from excess grease,
oils, and caked-on soils from previous work prior to arrival at the site.
I Equipment which leaks fuel, coolant, and lubricants shall be removed from the
' .
site and repaired prior to use.
The work area of drill rigs and all doy.,n-hole tools and equipment shall be
cleaned with high pressure steam cleaning equipment using potable water from
'
44
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
D
I
I
I
I
3,
4,
' ' ' a treated municipal supply at the commencement and completion of the work
'
and between boring or well locations.\ Backhoes used for te.st pit excavation
shall be cleaned in the same manner. 1
I
Equipment or materials not used imrhediately after decontamination wiU be
placed on a plastic sheet, covered witt;i plastic and secured to avoid potential
contamination. !
Equipment such as pumps, flow lines, etc. will be flushed thoroughly with
potable water from a treated municipal!supply prior to use.
Sampling equipment (split spoons, hand augers, trowels, mixing bowls, etc.) which
will be used at multiple sampling locations will be cleaned in the field after each use,
' ' i in accordance with the following cleaning pr~cedures:
1. Clean with tap water and phosphate-free laboratory detergent, (Liquonox: or
equivalent) using a brush if necessary to remove particulate matter and surface
' films.
2. . Rinse thoroughly with tap water.
3. Rinse thoroughly with deionized water. '
4. Rinse two times with pesticide grade is~propanol solvent and allow to air dry
for as long as possible.
5. Rinse thoroughly with organic-free water if it is necessary to reuse tt;ie
I
equipment before solvent drying is complete.
45
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
D
0
0
6. Wrap equipment completely with aluminum foil, shiny side out, to prevent
I
contamination if equipment is to be stored or transported.
I
'
' Water rinsate from the decontamination process will be allowed to percolate into the
soil in confined, designated areas. These sites will be located in areas where near
I '
surface soils are expected to be contaminated. The boundaries of these site will be
I surveyed and included on the final site plan. 1 lsopropanol rinsate will be segregated
, I '.
from water rinsate and allowed to evaporate. ,Dilute acid rinsate will be further diluted
with tap water prior to disposal.
2.3.11 Background Soil Samples
Two soil samples will be collected from the Macon/Dockery site during Phase I of the
RI for use as background samples. The two samples will be collected from areas
near the Macon and the Dockery sites that a~e considered free from environmer;ital
impact. Actual sample locations will be determined during the RI following a detailed
site reconnaissance. Chemical analyses of 1these samples will be conducted for
' metals and pesticides. Soil samples collected from the Macon/Dockery site will ,be
I reviewed in comparison with these samples. ,
2.3.12 Quality Control for Soil Sampling ,
The QC plan for surface soil sampling has been developed to ensure proper sample
collection and handling, proper field documentation of sampling procedures, and
proper packaging of samples prior to transportation to the laboratory.
1
All soil sample collection activities will be documented by the field personnel at the
' time of collection in permanent field log book.; The log book will include information
provided on the sample label and will identify all major equipment used so that is
I
46
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
0
I
0
0
0
I
can be traced. All cleaning, maintenance, ari_d repair procedures will be recorded.
All samples will be labeled in accordance with Section 2.11.
' I
Field preservation of soil samples requires c~oling to 4"C. All soil samples will be
cooled immediately after collection and mixing., Shipping containers will be prepared • I
for transportation to the laboratory in accorda~ce with Section 2.12, Sample Chain of
Custody.
In addition to a field log, a test boring log will: be maintained throughout the drilling
program, including the subsurface soil sampling. The following items will be included
in the log:
boring number and
soil and lithologic descriptions
' '
' type of drilling equipment and driller
method of drilling
drilling and sampling time
depth to water table, date and timJ measured
type of sampling equipment
The log will provide field documentation of sa~pling procedures that will be cross-
referenced to ensure that field records are consistent.
Laboratory accuracy and precision will be verified through the use of matrix spike
I
duplicate samples in accordance with standard CLP protocols. Additional QC
I
samples as described in Section 3.7 will be collected as appropriate during the soil
sampling investigation.
47
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' 2A STREAMBED SEDIMENT SAMPLING PROGRAM
' The streambed sediment sampling program for the Macon/Dockery· site has been
developed to determine if and to what extent sediments moving through the fluvial systems I
have been contaminated, Nine streambed sediment sample locations have been identified
in the vicinity of the site, Seven streambed sediment samples will be collected in ,the
vicinity of the locations shown in Figure 2.8 duri~g Phase I of the RL Two additional
I
locations have been selected for possible sample collection during Phase IL A decision will
' ' be made regarding the necessity to collect the two additional samples following a review
of the Phase I results, Composite samples will be;collected as described in the following
procedures, Sediment samples will be analyzed for TCL/fAL parameters,
2-4-1 Streambed Sediment Sampling Procedure
The streams to be sampled at the Macon/Dockery site are first or second mder
streams and are generally smalL Because effective sediment sampling is dependent
on sample collection from depositional areas, field personnel will determine in the
I field the exact sampling sites, Typical depositional areas are located downstream of ' .
obstructions in the water or turbulent areas. Samples will be collected in close '
proximity to the sampling locations shown lin Figure 2,8, The specific sampling
locations will be recorded in field log book and located and numbered on the field
site map,
Once the sampling site has been determined and recorded, a composite of the
' .
I streambed sediments at the sampling location will be collected except for the volatile
I
organic fraction, The volatile organic fracti~n of the TCL parameter list will be a
discrete sample from a depositional area, The sample will be collected from the
stream bank at water level and/or at the c~nter of the stream, A clean, stainless
steel spoon or grain scoop will be used to collect the sample, Except for the volatile
' organic sample, the sample will then be placed in a clean glass or Teflon'.coated
48
Phase 2,
, ~
I ' Background · \ ..
If Necessary '\ . I ·\ : .. ·. ,-,
· .
..--1. ! • .. _.--, ·---,r·· .. -~-· ~~ ·
SCALE 1:24000
======"'11::' ========OE=="==========~! MILE I CONTOUR INTERVAL JO FEET
Lv
I ■■■SIRRINE ••■•■ENVIRONMENTAL!. • CONSULTANTS
'
Figure 2.8
Streambed Sediment/
Surface Water
OU.,.ORANGLE LOCATION l,..._ _________ ..._ __ Gr_een-vr_,1e_._Sout __ h_C_o_ro1_rn_o_...,...-1. ___ s_a_m_p_1_e_L_o_c_a_ti_o_n_M_a_p __ ....J
OI.INC,.H-f'AANE:ll, INC .. CH,.IHOTT[ 3a, 800-~32-&0?2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I stainless steel tray and gently mixed using the sampling spoon or a clean stainless
steel spoon. The sediment in the pan will bJ scraped from the sides, corners, and
bottom of the pan, rolled to the middle of the ban, and gently mi~ed. · The sample ;will
' . I , then be quartered and moved to the corners of the tray. The sample will then, be
! I
carefully placed in the sample containers previously described. For volatile organics,
I . :
the sample container will be gently tapped as the sample is placed in the container,
I '
and the container will be completely filled to ~liminate any headspace.
I
Surface water samples will also
sediment samples (Section 2.4).
' i be collected from the same sampling points as
I I
To ensurJ representative surface water sample
' I ' ' collection, surface water samples will be collected before sediment samples.
I
2.4.2 Pond Sediment Sampling Procedure I
I
!
A composite sample of pond sediment will be collected from at least three locations
i in the pond. The sediment will be collected with either a Ponar dredge or an Ekman
dredge. The Ponar dredge is constructed lot stainless steel and is designed to
I
sample all types of sediments. The dredge ~as a closing mechanism that releases
;
for sample collection when the instrument ! hits bottom. The Ekman dredge is
designed for collecting stiff bottom sediments., The Ekman dredge is also constructed
' I of stainless steel and has a jaw-control mechanism. After a sample of sediment has
I been collected, the dredge will be retrieved to the surface. The sample will be mixed I .
and divided (except for the volatile organic fraction) as described on the previous
I
section.
2.4.3 Sampling Personnel and Equipment
I
I
I The following field personnel will direct and complete streambed sediment sampling
I
activities as detailed above: 1
50
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
On-site Coordinator/Field Hydrogeologist
Technician
Field/Office liaison
Confirmation of sampling lo~ations
Overall technical oversight
Sample collection
Assistance with record keeping
Sample packaging and shipment
I
The equipment required for the described tasks includes:
• Ponar or Ekman stainless steel dredge j
Field log book
Camera
• Stainless steel spoons or spatulas
• Stainless steel scoop
• Glass or stainless steel mixing bowls
• Sample containers and labels
Coolers with ice packs
• Sample document control forms
• Decontamination equipment
• Health and safety equipment
51
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• I
•
I
•
I
I
D
m
ft
I
u
2.4.4 Decontamination for Streambed Sediment Sampling Equipment .
' '
Decontamination of the sampling equipment will be accomplishecl by using the
following procedure.
1. Wash equipment with phosphate-free laboratory detergent and tap water
using a brush to remove any part_iculate matter or surface films.
2. Rinse equipment thoroughly with tap water.
3. Rinse equipment thoroughly with deionized water .
I
4. Rinse equipment twice with pesticide grade isopropanol and allow to air
dry.
i
5. Rinse equipment thoroughly with organic free water if it is necessary to
reuse the equipment before solvent drying is complete.
' 6. Wrap equipment completely with aluminum foil to prevent contamination
during storage or transport .
I
I Water rinsate from the decontamination process will be allowed to percolate into the
soil in confined, designated areas. These sit~ will be located in areas where near I
surface soils are expected to be contaminated. The boundaries of these sites will
be surveyed and included on the site plan. lsopropanol rinsate will be segregat~d
from water rinsate and allowed to evaporate. :
'
52
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.4.5 Background Streambed Sediment Samples
I
I
Two streambed sediment samples will be collected from the Macon/Dockery site
I •
during Phase I of the RI for use as background samples. The two samples will be
collected from areas near the Macon and thJ Dockery sites that are considered free
from environmental impact. These background locations are delineated on Figure 2.8.
I ' I Chemical analyses of these samples will b,e conducted for TCLJTAL parameters.
I
Streambed sedimen) samples collected down;stream from the Macon/Dockery site will
' ' be reviewed in comparison with these samples.
i
2.4.6 Quality Control for Streambed Sedime~t Sampling
!
I
The quality control plan for sediment sampling has been developed to ensure proper
sample collection and handling, proper field ~ocumentation of sampling procedures,
I
and proper packaging of samples prior to transportation to the laboratory.
I
All sediment sample collection activities will I be documented by the field perso~nel
at the time of collection in a permanent field 1109 book. The field log will include the
information provided on the sample label and information regarding sampling
. I .
equipment used. The samples will be labeled in accordance with Section 2.11.
!
Field preservation of sediment samples requires cooling to 4°C. All sediment samples
I
will be cooled immediately after collection. Shipping containers will be prepared for
I
transportation to the laboratory in accordan:ce with Section 2.12, Sample Chain of
' Custody.
I
Laboratory accuracy and precision will be verified through the use of matrix spike
' I
(MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) samples in accordance with standard CLP
protocols.
53
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
Additional QC samples, as described in Section 3.7, will be collected as appropriate
! '
during the streambed sediment sampling investigation.
2.5 SURFACE WATER SAMPLING PROGRAM
I
To determine if contaminants are migrating off site; by means of surface water transport,
samples will be collected from the streams bordering the site and from the small pond
' downstream of the Macon site. Nine surface water, sample locations have been identified I I ;
' in the vicinity of the site. A total of seven surface ,water samples will be collected during
I
Phase I of the RI. Two additional locations have been selected for sample collection during
I
Phase II if necessary based upon the results of Phase I samples. Sample locations are
shown on Figure 2.8. To prevent sample dilution and elevated levels of suspended solids,
I
no surface water samples will be collected during oj immediately after any major rain event
and always preceding collection of the streambed sediment sample. Surface water samples
I
will be analyzed for TCL/T AL parameters. Surface: water samples will be collected either
directly with the sample container or with a dipper1 constructed of inert material such; as
stainless steel, Teflon, or glass. Each surface water sample will be divided into sam'ple
containers required for the different methods of analysis. The containers for volatiles will
be completely filled such that a convex meniscus is formed allowing no headspace in the
vial. If no surface water is present at a given locc1tion only the sediment sample will be
collected.
2.5.1 Stream Sampling Procedures
I
Prior to obtaining a surface water sample from· a stream for semi-volatiles, pesticides,
I I
and inorganics, a dipper will be attached, if necessary, to a long pole to allow access
I to any point in the stream. The dipper will initially be flushed thoroughly with water
from the stream. To collect the sample, the :dipper device will be submersed with
' minimal surface disturbance. When the sam~le has been collected in the dipper, it
54
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
0
I
will be gently transferred to the sample containers. To obtain a surface water sample
from a stream for volatile organics, the sample will be collected directly in the sample
container. I
2.5.2 Pond Sampling Procedure
I An alternate procedure will be used to sample the small pond to account for possible
I
contaminant stratification. A vertical composite will be obtained from the center of the . '
pond by withdrawing discrete water sampl~,s from a deep, midpoint, and shallow
water depth and compositing into one sample. The vertical composite will be mixed
by gently transferring the sample to an open glass, Teflon, or stainless steel container.
'
Sample containers for semi-volatiles, pesticides, and inorganics will then be filled
I
directly from the open mixing container using care to avoid agitation of the sample.
I The sample for volatile organics will be directly collected from the midpoint location
and not composited.
The pond samples will be collected using a: Bacon Bomb Sampler. This stainless
steel sampling device allows collection of water samples at discrete intervals.
2.5.3 Sampling Personnel and Equipment
The following field personnel will direct and complete surface water sampling activi!ies
as detailed above:
On-site Coordinator/Field Hydrogeologist
• Field/Office liaison
•
•
Confirmation of sampling location$
Overall technical oversight
55
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Technician
• Sample collection
• Assistance with record keeping
Sample packaging and shipment ;
I
The equipment required for the described tasks includes:
!
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Bacon Bomb sampler
Camera
Field log book
Thermometer
Specific Conductivity meter
Stainless steel or Teflon dipper
Sample containers and labels
Coolers with ice packs
Sample document control forms
Decontamination equipment
Health and Safety equipment
2.5.4 Decontamination for Surface Water Sampling Equipment
I
Decontamination of surface water sampling e9uipment will be accomplished by using
the following procedure:
I
1. Wash with phosphate-free detergent an'd tap water as soon as possible after
I
use, using a brush to remove any partic;:ulate matter or surface film.
2. Rinse equipment thoroughly with tap water.
56
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.8 GROUND WATER SAMPLING PROGRAM
' The ground water sampling program has been developed to determine to what extent the
I .
ground water at the Macon/Dockery site has been contaminated and to define' the
horizontal and vertical extent of that contamination. The sampling program will consist of
sampling existing and newly constructed monitoring wells during Phase I of the investigation
and sampling all wells constructed during Phase II of the investigation as outlined in Section ,
2 of the Work Plan. The locations of existing and; planned wells are presented in Figures
' 2.1 and 2.2. The sampling program will include collection of samples for laboratory
analysis, field analysis of pH, specific conductance,· and temperature, and ground water
'
level measurements.
Following the private well survey conducted during Phase I of the RI, appropriate private
' wells in the vicinity of the Macon/Dockery site will be selected for sampling. These well will
' be sampled in accordance with procedures outlined in EPA (1986c) and chemical analyses
conducted for appropriate site-related indicator parameters.
2.8.1 Ground Water Sampling Procedures
One set of ground water samples will be collected from the existing wells and new
'
wells MW-10, MW-11, MW-12, and MW-19 during Phase I. During Phase 11, ground
' water samples will be collected from all other on-site monitoring wells and monitoring
well MW-1.
71
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.8.2 Task Team and Responsibilities
On-site Coordinator/Sampling Specialist,
Field/office liaison
Overall technical oversight
Technician
' Health and safety screeningl
General support
2.8.3 Equipment and Procedures
Equipment required for this test includes:
•
•
•
•
•
Field log book
pH meter
Thermometer
Specific Conductivity meter
Water level indicator
Calibration standards
Purge pump
Generator
Teflon bailers with Teflon-coated stainless steel leader
Polypropylene cord
Fiberglass measuring tape and stainless steel weight
Sample containers and labels
Sample packaging and shipping ~quipment
!
' 72
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample document control and shipping forms
Decontamination solutions and eRuipment
OVA I
Health and safety equipment
The SEC Field Data Information Log (Figure 2.11) will be used to record all
measurements made during well purging and sampling. This form was designe_d to
be used as a checklist and as documentatiora for all ground water sampling activities
'
for an individual well. Information to be recorded on this form will include:
• data • field personnel '
• site/facility name • well identification
weather conditions • total well depth i
I
ground water depth well diameter
casing material well volume calculation
' I
evacuation method well integrity ' • •
I
• field pH field specific cdnductance
• water temperature
I
Completed Field Data Information Logs will tie included for each well in the RI Report I .
for this investigation. Sampling activities will also be documented in the field log
I
book. I
Prior to the initiaton of any activities at each well site, all sampling personnel will don
new, laboratory-grade gloves. These gloves will be replaced as necessary during
well evacuation and sampling, and they will :always be changed between wells.
When the well is opened for sampling, any odors detected will be noted and the
' presence of organic vapors will be screened using an OVA.
73
&ii liiiil liiiil liiiil liiiil .. SIRRINE FIGURE 2.11
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS Field Data Information Log for Ground Water Sampling
Page of
Date (yr/mo/day) _____________________ _
Fleld Personnel ______________________ _
Site Name ________________________ _
SEC Job# ________________________ _
Well lD# ___________ ~-------------
__ Upgradlent __ Downgradlent
Weather Conditions ____________________ _
Air Temperature ----------------------•-=-c
Total Well Depth (lWD) = _________________ 1_/1_00_11
Depth to Ground Water (DGW) = _______________ 1,..i-'-'100""-'ll"-
Length of Water Column (LWC) = lWD • DGW = ---------~1~/1~00=ft~
1 Casing Volume (OCV) = LWC x ____ =-----------~-al
5 Casing Volumes = _________ ..,g;:.al:..;=c..S;:.t:;;a-"n.:;.da:.;r..:;d..:E:.;v..:;a.:;.cu:.;a:.;tl..:;o-"n-'V-=o-"lu"-m"'e'-
~ -Method-of Well· Eva·cuatlon -------·--------------------Method of Sample Collection ------------------Tot a I Volume of Water Removed al
Slrrln·a Environments! Consultants
P.O. Box 24000
Greenville, SC 29616
Casing Olameter ____________________ _;l:.;nc:.;h-"a..:;..•
Casing Material _______________________ _
Measuring Point Elevatlon _________________ ...;1c./1'-'00"-'ll'-
Helght of Riser (above land surface) ______________ 1_11_00_11_
Land Surface Elevatlon ------------------~1~/1~00~11
Screened Interval --------------------~1~/1~00~11
Dedicated Pump or Baller YES __ NO __ Type __
Steel Guard Pipe Around Casing YES NO
Locking Cap YES NO
Protective Poat/Abutment YES __ NO
Well Integrity Satlafaclory YES __ NO
Well Yield LOW __ MODERATE __ HIGH
Remer~~----_-_----_-_-_-___________________________ ----------=.,...,......,.----,, ____ ~
FIELD ANALYSES
VOLUME PURGED (gallons)
TIME (military)
pH (S.U.)
Eh (mV)
Sp. Cond. (µmhos/cm)
Water Temp. (°C)
TURBIDITY (subJectlve) •
• (1).Clear (2) Sllght-(3) Moderate (4) High
COMMENTS/OBSERVATIONS:
fldlnlo 10/87
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.8.4. Well Evacuation
Each well will be purged prior to sample collection to remove any stagnant water
from the well, thereby ensuring that the saniples collected are representative of the
' . . water quality surrounding each well. Prior to well evacuation or sample collection,
the ground water depth is determined using an electronic water level meter as
' described in Sectior.i 2.8.8. Following each use, the instrument is cleaned according
to the field cleaning procedure described in :Section 2.8.6.
For wells that recover quickly, three to five volumes of water will be removed.
' Specific conductance, pH, and water temperature will be measured periodically during
' well evacuation. Wells that can be evacuated to dryness with less than five well ,.
' ' volumes being removed will be sampled as ,soon as the well has recovered enough
to yield sufficient volume for a sample.
Well purging will be accomplished using Teflon bailers with Teflon-coated stainless
steel leaders. Only the bailer and leader will be allowed to contact the water colcimn.
Only new polypropylene rope will be used: at each sample location. Care will be
taken to ensure that the rope does ont cor;itact the ground during well evacuation
or sample collection. Purging techniques will be in accordance with procedures
' described in Section 4.7.5.3 of the EPA Region IV SOPQAM (April, 1986). The
volume of water to be evacuated is calcula\ed using the following equation:
where:
1r = 3.14159
r = radius of well casing
75
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
h = height of water column in well (Tbtal well depth -depth to ground water
' prior to purging.)
V = volume of water in well
Minimum Purge Volume = V x 5
2.8.5 Sample Collection
1. After the well has been purged, collect the sample within three hours with the
bailer. The sample containers will be filled_directly from the bailer. Volatile organic
samples will be collected first.
2. Measure and record in the log book the pH, temperature, and specific conductance
of the sample. These measurements may be taken from a sample collected in
'
an additional container. All instrument calibrations will also be recorded. Visual
characteristics of the sample, including inkoluble materials, will be recorded. ·
3. Add chemical preservatives to sample bottles, if applicable.
4. Secure caps on bottles with laboratory-supplied custody tape.
5. Place volatile organic samples in plastic bags and seal.
6. Complete documentation for all samples. I
i
7. Pack samples in coolers with ice packs f6r shipment.
'
8. Complete appropriate sections of COC. Place custody seal tape around cooler.
'
76
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9. Ship samples to analytical laboratories within 24 hours following collection.
I
1 o. Advise subcontractor laboratory of sample shipment.
• I
'
I
2.8.6 Decontamination for Ground Water Sampling Equipment
I
Decontamination of nround water sampling equipment will be accomplished by using
., , I ,
the following procedure: 1
I
I
I
1. Wash with phosphate-free detergent and tap water as soon as possible after: use
using a brush to remove any particulate ~alter or surface film.
2. Rinse equipment thoroughly with tap water.
I
I
3. Rinse equipment with 10% nitric acid solJtion.
I
4. Rinse equipment thoroughly with tap water.
I
5. Rinse equipment thoroughly with distilled
1
water.
I
6. Allow equipment to air dry. I
I
I
I . ' 7. Wrap equipment completely with aluminum foil to prevent contamination during
I
I storage or transport to and from the fieldl and between sampling locations.
Water rinsate from the decontamination process will be allowed to percolate into the
I
I soil in confined, designated areas. These sites will be located in areas where near
i
surface soils are expected to be contaminat~d. The boundaries of these sites will be
77
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
surveyed and included on the site plan. Dilute acid rinsate will be further diluted with
tap water prior to disposal.
2.8.7 Quality Control for Ground Water Sampling
QC for ground water sampling consists of traceable documentation of sample
I collection activities, proper field preservation t!lchniques, and measurement of sample
handling effectivenel5S using appropriate blank samples.
Ground water sample collection activities will lbe traceable through a permanent field
' log book maintained by field personnel. The field log will include the information
I
given on the sample label as well as the sampling equipment used. All ground water
samples will be labeled at the time of sampling in accordance with Section 2_.11.
' Field preservation of ground water samples being sent to the analytical laboratory will
I comply with the requirements given in Table, 3.1.
Necessary preservatives will be added and samples will be cooled immediately after
collection. Shipping containers will be prepJred for transportation to the labora,tory
I
in accordance with Section 2.12, Sample COC.
Ground water samples will be placed in clean glass jars to be field analyzed for pH,
' specific conductance, and temperature. Field calibration of analytical equipment will
be in accordance with Section 3.5.
Laboratory accuracy and precision will be verified through the use of MS and MSD
samples in accordance with standard CLP lprotocols. Additional QC samples', as
I describe in Section 3.7, will be collected as appropriate during the ground water
sampling investigation.
78
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.8.8 Ground Water Level Measurement
' ' Water level measurements will be taken frorl) all monitoring wells at the site during
:
the RI. Water level measurements will be ,made on a bi-monthly basis or niore
I frequently during the RI to monitor water level fluctuations. Water level measurements
will be taken from all monitoring wells at the ~ite on the same day at least two ti~es
during the RI to provide two complete sets oi comparable measurements. Surveyed
I .
elevations will be established at each well to determine water level elevations. These
water level measurements will be us~d to caldulate hydraulic gradients and determine
' I' directions of ground water flow at the site.
2.8.8.1 Equipment and Procedures
All water level measurements will be made using an electronic water level
I
meter. The water levels will be measured by slowly lowering the instrument
probe into the well. When the probe reaches the water surface, the circuit
i is completed and a buzzer is activated. The distance from the top of the well
'
casing to the water level is then measured and recorded. The water level
'
indicator cable is calibrated in increments 'of 0.05 feet. Water levels will be
estimated to nearest 0.01 feet.
i All water level measurements will be recorded in the field log book including:
date and time of measurement, description:of measuring point and the name of I
the individual making the measurement. 1When the well cap is removed, an
I •
OVA will be used to screen the air space: immediately above the well casing.
The level of vapors detected and any odors noted will also be recorded.
I
79
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A history of all ground water level measurements taken during the RI will be
maintained for each well on a Ground Water Level Monitoring Report (Figure
I
2.12). Complete sets of water level measurements taken on the· same day '
will be recorded on the Water Level Summary Report (Figure 2.13).
2.8.8.2 Equipment Decontamination
All equipment will be decontaminated between wells in accordance with the
' :
procedures described in Section 2.8.6.
2.8.9 Total Well Depth Measurement
The total depth of all monitoring wells will be measured prior to initiating well
I evacuation. The well depth is determined by; slowly lowering a heavy stainless steel
i
weight attached to a fiberglass tape measure into the well. When the bottom of! the
well is encountered, the tape will be raised slightly and slowly lowered until the weight
is resting on the bottom of the well and the tape remains taut. The depth of the well
is then read directly from the tape. The length of the height will be added to the
I depth read from the tape and recorded in the field log book. Both the tape measure
and the stainless steel weight will be decontaminated between wells in accordance I with the procedures described in Section 2.8.6.
I 2.9 HYDRAULIC TESTING
I
I
I
I
I
I
Slug tests will be performed during Phase I and II of the RI to determine
I
representative hydraulic conductivity values for the sites.
80
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' FIGURE 2.12
SIRRINE I
!
PAGE OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS
GROUND WATER LEVEL MONITORING REPORT
PROJECT JOB NUMBER
LOCATION INSTALLATION NUMBER
CLIENT TYPE OF INSTALLATION
• DESCRIPTION OF MEASURING POINT
LOCATION
ELEVATION OF MEASURING POINT
SURVEY DATUM I
i
DATE TIME DEPTH TO WATER ELEVATION REMARKS•
FROM MEASURING POINT (FT) OF WATER (FT)
..
"INDICATE ELAPSED TIME AFTER INSTALLATION, DEVELOPMENT OR Pl/AGING, RECENT WEATHER, ETC.
----
'
READ BY
'
'
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SIRRINE
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS
FIGURE 2.13
I PAGE OF ------
WATER LEVEL DATA SUMMARY
PROJECT ' -------------------'-
L OC A Tl ON :
CLIENT
' SURVEY DATUM ------~---------
MEASURING DEVICE
MEASURING POINT
WELL 1----...-------i DEPlH TO
NUMBER DESCRIPTION ELEVATION (FT) WATER (FT)
' I
'
ELEVATION Of •
WATER(FT) 1
I
JOB NUMBER
DATE
MEASURED BY
COMMENTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
During Phase 11, a pumping test will be conducted to develop additional information
concerning the hydrogeologic characteristits of the unconfined aquifer at 'the
I ,
Macon/Dockery site. The test information will also be used to evaluate the feasibility
of ground water extraction as a method of remediation at the site, if required.
I
'
2.9.1 Hydraulic Testing Locations
I
Slug tests will be conducted in each of the water table wells installed during the RI.
I
The location of a pumping test will be evaluated during Phase II of the RI.
I
2.9.2 Task Team and Responsibilities
On-site Coordinator/Hydrogeologist
Field/office liaison
Personnel coordination
Overall technical oversight
Technicians
Support personnel
2.9.3 Slug Test Procedures
Equipment required for this task includes:
Field log book
' I • Electronic data logger and water level transducers
I
• Electronic water level tapes
• Displacement slug
83
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Decontamination solution and equipment
• Health and safety equipment (based oh previous well site screening data}'
i
' i ' Slug tests will be performed and evaluated iri accordance with procedures described
by Bouwer & Rice (1976) and Bouwer (1989). A conservative range of permeability
values can be obtained by subjecting eath test to three methods of analysis.
Methods described by Hvorslev {1951), Bo~er and Rice {1976), and Nguyen ·and
Pinder {1984) will be used.
Procedures to be followed for performing sh.Jg tests are outlined below:
I
I
1. Measure and record the depth to water With the electronic water level tape.
2. Install water level transducer in monitor well.
I
'
3. Record static water level. Check that it agrees with initial measurement.
4. Introduce slug into well.
5. Allow water level to stabilize.
6. Activate data logger and instantaneously .remove slug.
7. Allow water level to stabilize.
8. Record data.
84
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·•
I
I
I
I
2.9.4 Pumping Test
Equipment required for this task includes:
Field log book
Data logger and water level transducers
• Electronic water level tapes
• Stainless steer submersible pumps
• Water flow meter(s)
• Miscellaneous pipe, fittings, valves, hoses
I
Generator
Barometer
I
A pre-test will be conducted to determine the optimum flow rate, to adjust flow I
controls, and test all equipment. After water levels have stabilized from the pre-test,
at least 12 hours of water level data will be collected immediately prior to conducting
the test. The pumping test will be condudted for a minimum of 24 hours at a
!
constant pumping rate. Recovery will be mor;iitored for a minimum of 12 hours after
pumping has ceased. Ground water, pH, specific conductivity, and discharge rate
will be monitored throughout the test. The pumping test will be conducted in
I
accordance with procedures described in :Groundwater and Wells (Johnson Division,
I
1986) and Groundwater Pumping Tests (Walton, 1987).
The pumping test location will be selected after chemical analyses of ground water
: '
samples have been completed. The test location will be selected to minimize potential
impact to existing ground water conditions. If analyses indicate that the ground water
contains hazardous constituents above action levels at the test location, water from I ' . I the pumping test will be discharged according to state requirements or containerized
!
for proper disposal.
85
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appropriate data analysis methodology will b:e selected based on t~e characteristics
of the drawdown curve. Porous media analyses, based on Thei~ (1935), will be
performed if appropriate.
2.9.5 Equipment Decontamination
I
Equipment will be ·decontaminated in accordance with procedures described in
, I
Section 2.8.6.
2.10 SOIL GAS SURVEY
' Following completion of Phase I of the RI, an evaluation will be made to determine· the
appropriateness of a soil gas survey. If it is determined that a soil gas survey is necessary, '
a modification to the POP will be submitted to the RPM for approval. This modification will
I
present detailed procedures for conducting a ~oil gas survey at the Macon/Dockery site.
2.11 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Prior to collecting each sample, the sample cont1iners will be labeled with the following
information: 1
• Date and time of sample collection
• Sample identification code
• Name of person who collected sample
Type of preservative added to sample
• Parameters to be analyzed
86
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Other media specific information, such as sampling interval, may be added. The sample
identification code will consist of the SEC job identification number, a sample media code,
a sample location number, and a sample replicate number. The format for the sample
identification number is as follows:
9168-SW-2-1
where:
9168 = Macon/D'ockery job identjfication number
SW = sample media code
2 = sample location number
1 = sample replicate number
Sample media codes are SW for surface water samples, MW for ground water samples,
SEO for sediment samples, SL for soil samples, and W for waste samples. The sample
'
location number on the label will correspond to the: sample location numbers assigned on
the field site map.
'
' If it is determined during the field sampling program that additional samples are needed in
locations other than those designated in the POP ihe following procedure will apply:
' I
1. Collect sample in accordance with the apl?ropriate media sampling procedure in
' the POP.
2. Assign a sample identification code using the next highest sample location number.
3. Mark location where sample was collected with a stake and write the sample
identification code on the stake.
87
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
4. Mark location where sample was collecte~d on the field site plan using the next
highest sample location number.
2.12 SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
It is imperative that an accurate record of samJ;lle collection, transport, analysis, and
disposal be maintained and documented. Therefore, COC procedures will be instituted and
followed throughout the RI.
'
I
I
COC procedures include field custody, laboratory custody and evidence files. The National
I
Enforcement Investigation Center (NEIC) of the EPA defines custody of evidence in the
following ways:
• In actual physical possession
• In view after being in physical possessionl
• In a locked repository
• In a secure, restricted area
It is necessary to establish documentation to trace sample possession from the time of
collection until disposal. The following list outlines field custody requirements:
I
I
'
' • As few people as possible shall handle sample(s).
'
• Sampler shall be responsible for the care and custody of the samples until they
are transferred or dispatched properly.
Samples shall be stored by those individuals or facilities designated on the COC form. The
following methodologies will be used to ensure pr6per transfer documentation:
'
Samples shall be accompanied by a COC record at all times.
88
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Samples shall be packed properly for shipment so that bottles will not dislodge
I •
and/or break during shipment.
'
• Samples shall be shipped via a 24-hour delivery service, when required, to ensure
holding times are not exceeded. The airbill number will be recorded to facilitate
tracking of the package, if necessary.
• Methodology of shipment, courier name(s), and other pertinent information shall
be recorded on COC form, with all measure~ ensuring special handling procedures
' as available by the delivery service utilized_ during shipment of the samples.
I
• When samples are split with an outside source or government agency, the split
shall be noted.
• All records pertaining to the shipment of a· sample shall be retained (freight bills, I I
post office receipts, and bills of lading).
I
'' ' Figure 2.14 is the chain of custody form to be used by personnel responsible for ensuring
the integrity of samples from the time of collectioh to shipment to the laboratory. The
contractor laboratory shall not accept samples for: analysis without a correctly prepared
' ' COC form. The contractor laboratory shall be responsible for maintaining chain of custody
I
' of the sample(s) from time of receipt to disposal. ,The contractor laboratory shall use all
forms and techniques specified by the CLP to ensl'.lre the integrity of all samples.
89
fiiiil liiiiiil
ijrlSIRRINE "':''II ENVIRONMENTAL
iNJliilcoNSULTANTS
Post Office Box 5229
Greenville, South Ca~olina 29606
CLIENT NAME
COLLECTED BY
0.
SAMPLE ID DATE :, TIME 0 u
Relinquished By: Date
Relinquished By· Date
a, -' <I: -' a: w
"' s:
Time
Time
iiiil iiiil iiiiil iiiil iiiiil iiiil --
FIGURE 2.14
Chain Of Custody Record
SAMPLE ANALYSIS (x)
~ FIP Fl FIP FIP IP IP IP FIP FIP FIP F -Filtered P-Preserved -:;;
C u x ·a; C c 0 ., w w w :,
0 u 0 (/) 0 0 z a: w w (/) Ci -' u ci (/) !,: -' Ci 0 2, 0 g
6 (/) ~ .= iii z 0 u. z u X u: a: u lfJ a: w ::; <I: SAMPLE LOCATION " :r' 0 0 f-0 w w w I Ci 0 >-REMARKS
0. f-f-Ci z > :, 0. I 0. <I: u u
-
----------------· ------ -------------------·· ---------------------------------
Received By: Relinquished By: IOate !Time I Received By:
Received By Lab By: Date !Time I Remarks
Oriqinal Reoort
I
I
I
I
•
I
•
D
0
0
D
I
I
I
a
I
I
I
The COC form shall be signed by each individual who has the samples in their possession.
I
Preparation of the COC form shall be as follows:
The COC record shall be initiated in the field by the person collecting the sample,
for every sample. Every sample shall be assigned a unique identification number
as described in Section 2.1.1. that is enterJd on the COC form. Samples can be
, I
' ' grouped for shipment using a single form. ;The COC form allows for 12 samples.
• The record shall be completed in the field to indicate project, sampling team, etc.
·1
i
If the person collecting the sample does not transport the samples to the laboratory
' or deliver the sample containers for shipment, the first block for "Relinquished By
' __ ." "Received By ___ " shall be completed in the field.
The person transporting the samples to the laboratory or delivering them for
'
shipment shall sign the record form as ''ReHnquished by _____ "
If the samples are shipped to the laboratorylby commercial carrier, the COC form
shall be sealed in a watertight container, plai:ed in the shipping container, and the
shipping container sealed prior to being given to the carrier.
If the samples are directly transported to the, laboratory, the COC shall be kept in
'
the possession of the person delivering the '.samples.
' • For samples shipped by commercial carrier, the waybill shall serve as an extensio'n
I of the COC record between the final field custodian and receipt in the laboratory.
91
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
Upon receipt in the laboratory, the Sample Receiving Supervisor shall open the
shipping containers, compare the contents with the COC record, ensure that
' ' document control information is accurate and complete, and sign and date the . I •
record. Any discrepancies shall be noted :on the COC form.
• If the discrepancies occur, the samples ir;i questions shall be segregated from
'
normal sample storage and the field persormel immediately notified.
I
, '
• The COC is completed upon receipt of the samples by the analytical service. lihe
completed COC form will be returned to th'e field manager.
• The analytical service shall track, internally; sample integrity utilizing a procedure
defined by the CLP.
2.13 SAMPLE PACKAGING AND SHIPPING
' The transportation of environmental samples from the time they are collected to their arrival
' at CompuChem Laboratories in RTP, North Carolina is an integral part of the '
Macon/Dockery RI. The mode of travel must be I such that the sample is not altered
physically, chemically or biologically. The travel time to the laboratory must not interfere
I
with the sample holding time. The COC must also be maintained during the transportation I
process. When sent by common carrier, the packaging, labeling and shipping of I
hazardous waste and substances is regulated by th'e U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT) under CFR 49 Parts 171 and 173.
Samples obtained at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites are classified as either
environmental samples or hazardous samples. Environmental samples are those which
contain low levels of contaminants and require implementation of limited precautionary
92
I
I procedures. Samples at the Macon/Dockery Site are tentatively being considered
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
I
I
I
I
m
g
I
environmental samples. Hazardous
dangerous levels of contaminants i.e.
samples are I those which could possibly contain
' '
Hazardous samples must be packaged and label_ed
'
according to procedures specified by the U.S. Dot or the state DOT, whichever is more
stringent.
Samples collected at the site will be immediately placed in the sample cooler. The sealed
and labeled container will be placed insi~e a secure ice chest and packed to pr~vent
breakage. Once the cooler is filled with samples, it will be closed and securely positioned
in an SEC sampling vehicle or other secure storage facility until the completion of the day's
I
sampling activities. The following protocol will be followed for packaging of samples:
I
Only waterproof metal or equivalent strength plastic ice chests and coolers will :be
used.
Following the completion of the sample label and tag, the sample will be carefl:Jlly
I
placed or poured into the container in the field. The sample tag will then be
attached to the container.
1
• The labels will be permanently affixed to each container. All labels will be
completed with an indelible pen.
I A custody seal will be placed on the samp,le container.
The volume level will be marked on each bottle with a grease pencil.
I
• Strapping tape will be placed around the lid: of all sample bottles except for volatile
' organic samples.
93
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• All bottles will be placed upright in the cooler in such a way that they do not touch
'
and will not touch during shipment.
• Additional inert packing material will be placed in the cooler to partially cover the
sample bottles. Ice or freeze packs will be placed around, among, and on top of
the sample bottles.
• Each cooler will be filled with additional cushioning materials to prevent movement
of samples during shipment. ' I
• The COC record will be placed in a waterproof plastic bag and taped to the inside
lid of the cooler.
If the cooler is equipped with a drain plug: it will be taped shut.
I
The lid will be secured with strapping tape at a minimum of two locations. No
I
labels will be covered. A custody seal will be placed around the secured coo_ler.
The completed shipping label will be attached to the top of the cooler.
I
' I
' "This Side Up" labels will be placed on the ~ides of the cooler, and "Fragile" labels
will be placed on two sides.
' • Numbered and signed custody seals will be placed on the front right and back
: '
left of each cooler. These seals will be covered with clear tape.
'
• The weight limit of the shipper will be maintained.
94
I
I
I
I
I
m
D
0
D
0
D
I
I
I
I
!
I
As soon as field personnel are ready to transport samples from the field to the laboratory,
they will notify the laboratory by telephone of the shipment. If the samples, are transported
' by field personnel, the estimated time of arrival at the laboratory will be given. If the
samples are shipped by commercial carrier, the· laboratory will be telephoned as soon as
the shipping containers are consigned to the shipper. Figure 2.15 contains the information
I
that must be provided to the laboratory. A blank ;of this form will be completed at the
laboratory during the telephone conversation.
' The final step in providing information to the laboratory is shown on Figure 2.16. The
Request for Analysis form will be completed by the ,field personnel and included with the
COC record. It is imperative that the Request fo~ Analysis form be provided so that
' analy1ical requirements are defined and sample holding times are not exceeded. It is
I
anticipated that all samples will be shipped from the site via Federal Express.
95
I
I
I
I
m
a
I
D
0
D
I
D
u
m
I
•
I
I
I
FIGURE 2.15:
SHIPMENT INFORMATION
' I
(Field to Lab by Telephone)
Date of Shipment: __________________ _
Laboratory Destination: --------'-----------
Laboratory Project Contact: __ ----,---~----------
(Name) (Telephone Number)
Number Containers Shipped:------'-----
Mode of Shipment: ____________ _
Shipment Number(s): -------~----
Time of Shipment: --------~----
Date/Time of Shipping Info Release to Lab: ----,-----------
Signature of Releaser: ------------------
NOTE: PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION,TO RECEIVING
LABORATORY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER
SAMPLES ARE SHIPPED. 1
I
------------------·-FIGURE 2.16
11111~!~~~~~ REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS
(This form must accompany samples -
Do Not send under separate cover)
Post Office Box 24000
Greenville; South Carolina 29616
PROJECT NAME DATE SAMPLES SHIPPED
PRO.MGR. LAB DESTINATION
JOB NO. LAB CONTACT .
BILL TO REPORT TO
P.O. NUMBER TELEPHONE NO.
SAMPLE NO. SAMPLE TYPE SAMPLE VOLUME PRESERVATIVE REQUIRED TESTING PROGRAM SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
-
---------
TURNAROUND TIME REQUIRED: (Turnaround time must be arranged with lab prior to shipment)
NORMAL RUSH .
POSSIBLE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION: (Please indicate if samples are hazardous materials and/or suspected to contain high levels of
chemical compounds.)
FLAMMABLE POISON SKIN IRRITANT TOXIC OTHER
(Please specify)
SAMPLE DISPOSAL : _ (Please indicate_disposition of sample_following analysis.) - - -- -
RETURN TO CLIENT DISPOSAL BY LAB
FOR LAB USE ONLY RECEIVED BY: DATEmME