NCD980729602_19940101_Jadco-Hughes_FRBCERCLA RA_Remedial Action Work Plan-OCR

I
I
g
D
0
D
I
I
• •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REMEDIAL ACTION
WORK PLAN
Jadco-Hughes Site
Gaston Country, North Carolina
JANUARY 1994
REF. NO. 3669 (18)
This r~port is printed on recycled paper.
RIECIE~VlED
MAR 1 5 1994
SUPERFUND SECTION
CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
• g
ft
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRO DU CTI ON ...................................................................................................... 1
1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND PURPOSE OF REPORT ...... l
1.2 ORGANIZATION OF REPORT .................................................................. 7
1.3 PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTION .............................................................. 9
1.4 PROJECT ORGANIZATION ....................................................................... 10
1.5 BASIS FOR REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTION ............................................. 10
2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................................................................... 11
3.0 ACCESS AGREEMENTS AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ................. 13
4.0 CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN ........................................... 15
5.0 SITE MANAGEMENT AND SEQUENCING ...................................................... 16
5.1 REMEDIAL ACTION CONTRACTOR SELECTION .............................. 17
5.2 SITE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................. 17
6.0 SPILLWAY, CULVERT AND DRAINAGE LINE ............................................... 19
6.1 ST A TEMENT OF WORK ............................................................................ 19
6.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS ................... 20
6.3 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN .............................. 20
6.4 IMPLEMENTATION AND SEQUENCING ............................................. 20
6.4.1 Site Preparation .............................................................................................. 20
6.4.2 Construction of Spillway, Culvert Lining and
Construction of Drainage Line .................................................................... 21
6.4.3 Construction Closeout .................................................................................. 21
6.5 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES ....................................................................... 21
7.0 GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION SYSTEM ....................................................... 23
7.1 STATEMENT OF WORK ............................................................................. 23
7.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS ................... 24
7.3 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN .............................. 24
7.4 IMPLEMENTATION AND SEQUENCING ............................................. 24
7.4.1 Site Preparation .............................................................................................. 24
7.4.2 Installation of Extraction Wells, Tile Drain and Pipeline ..................... 24
7.4.3 Construction Closeout .................................................................................. 25
7.5 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES ....................................................................... 25
8.0 GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM ....................................................... 26
8.1 STATEMENT OF WORK ............................................................................. 26
8.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS ................... 27
8.3 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN .............................. 27
3669 08) CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOOATES
I
I
•
I
I
I
u
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
8.4 IMPLEMENTATION AND SEQUENCING ............................................. 27
8.4.1 Site Preparation .............................................................................................. 27
8.4.2 Construction and Commissioning of the
Groundwater Treatment System ................................................................ 27
8.4.3 Construction Closeout .................................................................................. 28
8.5 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES ....................................................................... 28
9.0 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM ................................................................. 29
9.1 STATEMENT OF WORK ............................................................................. 29
9.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS ................... 29
9.3 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN .............................. 30
9.4 IMPLEMENTATION AND SEQUENCING ............................................. 30
9.4.1 Site Preparation .............................................................................................. 30
9.4.2 SVE Trenches and Pipeline ......................................................................... 30
9.4.3 Construction and Commissioning of the
SVE Treatment System ................................................................................. 30
9.4.4 Construction Closeout .................................................................................. 30
9.5 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES ....................................................................... 31
10.0 SOIL FLUSHING SYSTEM ....................................................................................... 32
10.1 STATEMENT OF WORK ............................................................................. 32
10.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS ................... 32
10.3 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN .............................. 33
10.4 IMPLEMENTATION AND SEQUENCING ............................................. 33
10.4.1 Site Preparation .............................................................................................. 33
10.4.2 Soil Flushing Extraction Trench, Pipeline and
Infiltration Galleries ........................... : .......................................................... 33
10.4.3 Commissioning of the Soil Flushing System .......................................... 33
10.4.4 Construction Closeout .................................................................................. 34
10.4.5 Schedule of Activities ................................................................................... 34
11.0 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN ..................................................... 35
12.0 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION AND REPORTING .......................................... 36
13.0 PROJECT CLOSEOUT ................................................................................................ 37
14.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS SUPPORT ............................................................... 39
15.0 REMEDIAL ACTION SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES .......................................... .40
16.0 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................ 41
3669 08) C0NESfOGA-R0VERS & AsS0OATES
I
I
I
I
I
' u
u
D
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURE 1.1
FIGURE 1.2
FIGURE 2.1
FIGURE 2.2
FIGURE 2.3
FIGURE 2.4
FIGURE 15.1
FIGURE 16.1
3669 (18)
LIST OF FIGURES
Following
Page
SITE LOCATION 1
MONITORING WELL AND PIEZOMETER
LOCATIONS 4
SITE DRAINAGE PATTERN 12
GEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION A-A' 12
SHALLOW GROUNDWATER FLOW PATTERNS 12
DEEP GROUNDWATER FLOW PATTERNS 12
RA SCHEDULE 40
PROJECT ORGANIZATION 41
CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOOATES
I
I
I ,.
I
I
I
I
I
g
u
u
n
fl
11
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIXC
APPENDIXD
3669 (18)
LIST OF APPENDICES
ACCESS AGREEMENTS
CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
CURRICULA VITAE
CONESfOCA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
B
II
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' ·1
I
I
l
I.
1.0
3669 {18)
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the Remedial Action (RA) Work Plan
for the Jadco-Hughes Site (Site).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND PURPOSE OF REPORT
The Site is located in Gaston County, North Carolina,
approximately 15 miles west of Charlotte (Figure 1.1).
The 6-acre Site is a former solvent reclamation and waste
storage facility which had two operators: C.A. Hughes, Inc. (1971 to 1975); and
Jadco, Inc. (1975). The Site was closed in 1975 and a North Carolina (State)
ordered cleanup was completed by 1983. After closure of the Site, several
reconnaissance evaluations were conducted by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEP A) and the State which identified
residual contamination. The Site was subsequently placed on the National
Priorities List (NPL) in May 1986. Later in 1986, an Administrative Order on
Consent was entered into between USEPA and a group of companies
identified as potentially responsible parties (PRPs) who formed the
Jadco-Hughes Steering Committee (Steering Committee).
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (CRA) was retained by the
Steering Committee to conduct a Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Study (RI and FS) and Superfund Risk Assessment (SRA).
Based on the analytical results for the soil, groundwater,
surface water and sediment samples which were collected during the RI, the
delineated Site contamination included:
• approximately 435 cubic yards (c.y.) of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)
contaminated surface soil;
1 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOC!A TES
I
I
I
I
I
I
ti
I
I
u
u
n
8
8
G
I
D
0
o' 1000'
,-' -
/"' ------c'.s -· -. -' .:_ ... ,--·--. -~· --. -
\
,,o___,,! .
__./ . ' . .-d-•'•
. )
<E::::::::.,....--=_j
.\'\~~,,,~~ ,, ~D.\~1,l\ . ~--1re· :,~
-----=-~:-r-·· 1 ~--~9:"---":
:!,RIJ!!!TA
,.-_;;.-
,.
1/
_u-
r~vc: \.
. ' J .
ag '!. osal :..-
-~-. '
ubsta~;· ~
, -' . 1/ •,:,' ._., I
.-:~ fl. _.-_, -.. · :,'. . ,,' _..., ... -
. / .... ;, ,
/ ,• ,' ! , , , : : ! ' .
···--;~,;
' .
. '!
~ ,' ,--.. ::,,,-,,, . ~ ;::i"V'-~-~ -!-'-. i ((2.Y:_J! r· _...,__.,,, 9l ,,..-, ,,re,, -_ _, ' -:,·}' ~ • ~"""!J.:C?.o ,,. ~---...=: /'-' I \ ,,--.:::::: -, ~ ,_.. =,----/'-: ! r •.......-7-'l ~ . 'o/~"-· r~,;:_,r,,,-...._ I ;.; \ / ( (
: • 1 •• UJ: .... ,,...:,'<.:~'4.. ·3,,_./ :;,/ 1 \ ,,-··,.,\ (
-_ / ,r-,~ "c:,t_ :z:~~§;;~~~~ ----------·, ,_/ 0 .~-.J'/ ',____ \ \,/i I .., ·••••A, I .----:::=too //. : ,' ·• rr .. • i\, J --r1 _
,,.. 11 • • :Ebtne:r.er Ch ~(/ \ . "\./ .----" ,' I ) • .:I,•-., ,' ', •~::. ~ _ I .,.,,--:.,,,-•f-.'---/_pJP 7" ,;
b -=--~: _-;-·----_:~_::::...,_----~. -~~ _,,. ·\\
-.---1; ----~ , _ l]1/{,::: I <,-(/}~~~j
SOURCE: uses QUADRANGLE MAP,
MOUNT HOLLY, N.C.
CAA
3669 (18) JAN 10/94 (W) REV.O
ont A ._ ;_ /'-/(! "') I r, __ ' -.~._; \\_; . 'I r-. . ,. ,,_. ,'V--I: ' -~,____....----,1 _-_; ,.~0/1 &l \ -~~
I. LAr,r£'
I
I
figure 1.1
SITE LOCATION
JADCO-HUGHES SITE
Gaston County, NC
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
B
I
I 3669 (18)
• approximately 6,000 c.y. of subsurface soil containing volatile organic
compounds (VOes) and base/neutral and acid extractable compounds
(BN As) and to a lesser extent, metals;
• Site groundwater containing voes and BNAs; and
• surface water in Tributary B containing voes.
The SRA concluded that the groundwater and surface
water pathways at the Site presented an unacceptable current and future risks
to human health and to the environment.
During the RI and FS, an Interim Remedial Measure
(IRM) was completed between September and December 1990 which resulted
in the excavation and disposal of PCB contaminated soils in the southeast
swale area. Approximately 900 c.y. of soils were excavated and disposed of
off-Site by landfilling at the Chemical Waste Management Inc. landfill in
Emelle, Alabama.
Upon completion of the RI and FS, USEPA issued a
Record of Decision (ROD) on September 27, 1990. The final remedy selected
by USEPA in the ROD and further described in the Scope of Work (SOW)
requires the following actions:
1) Provision of deed and access restrictions;
2) Performance of soil and groundwater remedy treatability studies;
3) Further delineation of groundwater contamination by installing five
additional groundwater monitoring wells and six piezometers;
4) Treatment of soils in the former landfill and approximately 500 c.y. of
soil from the Former Operations Area which are to be consolidated
into the former landfill. The soils shall be treated by a combination of
soil vapor extraction (SVE) and soil flushing. The SVE system will be
constructed and operated until data indicate that no further VOCs can
2 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9
D
0
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
practicably be removed. The soil flushing system will be operated as an
integral component of the groundwater collection and treatment
system;
5) Construction of a groundwater extraction system within the Site
boundaries including four extraction wells, in areas of elevated
contaminant levels, a subsurface drainage tile trench to collect
contaminated groundwater and a groundwater collection sump in the
annulus of the slip-lined culvert to collect groundwater that is
discharging to the culvert;
6) Construction of an on-Site treatment system. The system would
consist of an equalization and aeration tank. The air vented from the
aeration tank would be treated by carbon adsorption. The effluent from
the treatment system would be pumped to a City of Mt. Holly sanitary
sewer system manhole for subsequent treatment at the Mt. Holly
publicly owned treatment works (POTW);
7) Excavation and repair of the damaged sections of the Site culvert
followed by slip-lining of the culvert with butt-welded polyethylene
pipe;
8) Construction of a gravity drainage line to carry uncontaminated
groundwater from the spring discharge to the Tributary B north of the
Former Operations Area;
9) Construction of a surface water diversion consisting of a Site spillway;
10) Provision of long-term operation and maintenance including
monitoring of system controls;
11) Implementation of a monitoring program to assess the performance of
groundwater extraction, aeration and discharge system components.
Periodic monitoring of the groundwater will be performed to assure
that the remedy is working; and
3 CONESTOCA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
E
m
I
u
a
I
I
I
I
, I
I
• u
'ft
n
D
a
I
a
I
I
1
I
I
I
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
12) Tracking of analytical results to measure the efficiency /effectiveness of
the remedy.
Following issuance of the ROD by USEPA, the Steering
Committee was issued with an administrative order under Section 106 of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(Order) on June 19, 1991. Accompanying the Order was USEPA's Scope of
Work (SOW) for the Remedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/RA) for the
final remedy. The RD/RA schedule was revised according to USEPA's
schedule which was provided in a March 20, 1992 RD letter. CRA has been
retained to prepare the RD/RA Work Plans and perform associated design
activities.
In accordance with the SOW, pre-RD investigative
activities were completed by CRA between April and June 1993 and included
the following activities:
• a geophysical survey in the northern portion of the Site to supplement the
subsurface investigations that were completed during the Remedial
Investigation (RI) in this Area and the RI's geophysical survey completed
in the southern portion of the Site;
• analyses of one round of groundwater samples from existing monitoring
wells as part of the initiation of the groundwater monitoring program to
verify RI data for the RD and to assess the impact of silts and sediments on
metals concentrations in groundwater analyses;
• the installation of five additional monitoring wells and six piezometers
(Figure 1.2) to characterize groundwater chemistry and aquifer hydraulics
and to establish the Site sentry groundwater monitoring system required
by the USEPA's remedy for the Site (see Figure 1.2);
• analyses of one round of groundwater samples from the new monitoring
wells to characterize groundwater chemistry and aquifer hydraulics and to
confirm the vertical extent of groundwater contamination; and
4 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
---
LOCATED ON
CAROUNA
CUSTOM
CABINETS
PROPERTY
CAA
- --
ellWGS
el'Z•S
PROPERTY LINE
SHALLOW MONITORING 'M:Ll
DEEP MONITORING Wfll LOCATION
SHALLOW P1£ZOU[l[R
DEEP Pl[ZOMETER
PUMPING WELL
-
I I
I I
I I
I I
) \ ;,'
I
I
J669 (18) JAN 2B/94(W) R[V.O (P-55)
I!!!!!! ,!!!!9 ==
TEXTILE SALES AND
REPAIR PROPERTY
MW1J(l WW1J5 •
aa
0 50 IOO!l
H I
MONITORING WELL AND
iiiii
\
STARNES
PROPERTY
figure 1.2
PIEZOMETER LOCATIONS
JADCO-HUGHES SITE
Gaston County, NC
-
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I 31i69 (18}
• performance of a groundwater treatability study and a soil vapor extraction
(SVE) pilot study.
RD is defined as those activities required to prepare the
final plans and specifications, general provisions and specific requirements
necessary to translate the ROD and SOW into the remedy to be constructed
under the RA phase. RA is the implementation phase of site remediation or
the actual construction of the remedy, including necessary operation and
maintenance and performance monitoring. The RA is based on the RD to
achieve the remediation goals specified in the ROD.
The first task associated with the RD /RA for the Site was
the completion of a Site visit and scoping session. This scoping session was
held on August 29, 1991 and documented by CRA in the August 1991 progress
report to USEPA dated September 5, 1991. No substantive modifications to
the RD/RA resulted from this scoping session.
The second task associated with the RD/RA for the Site
was the preparation and submittal of a RD Work Plan. The RD Work Plan,
consisting of the RD Work Plan, the Sampling and Analyses Plan, the
Treatability Study Work Plan and the Health and Safety Plan was submitted
to USEPA on September 30, 1991. The RD Work Plan was formally approved
in its entirety by USEPA on April 7, 1993.
The third task associated with the RD/RA for the Site was
the preparation and submittal of a Preliminary Design Report reflecting the
design effort at 30 percent completion. The Preliminary Design Report was
based on pre-design activities which were conducted at the Site between April
and June 1993, as described above. The Preliminary Design Report,
documenting the results of the pre-design activities, treatability studies, and
the RD at the 30 percent design phase was submitted to USEPA on August 5,
1993. USEPA commented on the Preliminary Design Report in a letter dated
October 15, 1993 which was received by CRA on October 28, 1993. The Steering
Committee responded to USEPA's comments in a letter dated November 29,
1993. USEPA has not submitted its responses to the Steering Committee's
November 29, 1993 letter.
5 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
u
D
u 3669 (18)
The RA Work Plan, as presented herein, is submitted to
USEPA as the fourth task associated with the RD/RA for the Site. The RA
Work Plan presents the implementation, management and sequencing of the
remedial construction activities required to implement the RD for the Site as
presented in the Prefinal Design Report. The scheduled submission date for
the RA Work Plan is January 31, 1994.
The fifth task associated with the RD /RA for the Site is
the preparation and submittal of a Remediation Goal Verification Plan. The
Remediation Goal Verification Plan is a separate document which will be
submitted under separate cover to USEPA concurrent with this report as
required by the SOW. The scheduled submission date for the Remediation
Goal Verification Plan is January 31, 1994.
The sixth task associated with the RD/RA for the Site will
be the preparation and submittal of a Prefinal Design Report reflecting the
design effort at 90 percent completion. The scheduled submission date for the
Prefinal Design Report is February 28, 1994.
The seventh task associated with the RD/RA for the Site
will be the preparation and submittal of an Operation and Maintenance Plan
(O&M Plan). The O&M Plan will be submitted concurrently with the Prefinal
Design Report.
The eighth task associated with the RD/RA for the Site
will be the preparation and submittal of a Final Design Report reflecting the
design effort at 100 percent completion. The Final Design Report is scheduled
to be submitted to USEPA on April 29, 1994.
The above due dates are based upon a schedule proposed
in the November 29, 1993 letter to USEPA. This schedule will be dependent
upon USEP A approval of the schedule .and time-frames for USEP A approval
of the submittals.
6 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
g
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
The remaining tasks associated with the RD/RA for the
Site include: the construction of the remedy; the inspection of the completed
construction by USEPA; the preparation and submission of the Remedial
Action Report; and the Operation and Maintenance Manual; and the
long-term operation, maintenance and monitoring of the remedy.
1.2 ORGANIZATION OF REPORT
This includes each of the required elements as outlined in
the SOW. The SOW states that this RA Work Plan must include the
following elements:
a. A detailed description of the tasks to be performed and a description of
the work products to be submitted to EPA. This includes the
deliverances set forth in the remainder of Task Ill.
b. A schedule for completion of each required activity and submission of
each deliverable required by this Consent Decree, including those in
this SOW.
c. A project management plan, including monthly reports to EPA and
meetings and presentations to EPA at the conclusion of each major
phase of the RA.
d. A description of the community relations support activities to be
conducted during the RA. At EPA 's request, it is expected that the
Settling Defendants will assist EPA in preparing and disseminating
information to the public regarding the RA work to be performed.
e. A description of Settling Defendants' (sic) strategy for delivering the
project. This description shall focus on the management approach to
carry out the design and implement the Remedial Action. Items to be
addressed include procurement method and contracting strategy,
phasing alternatives, and contractor and equipment availability
concerns. If the construction of the selected remedy is to be
7 C0NESTOCA-R0VERS & AsS0OATES
I
I
I
I
I
g
u
I
I
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Jl,l,908)
accomplished by Settling Defendants' "in-house" resources, these
resources shall be identified.
These require men ts are addressed by the major sections
and Appendices of this RA Work Plan as follows:
• Section 1.0 -a general introduction to the Site project;
• Section 2.0 -a description of the existing conditions at the Site;
• Section 3.0 the access agreements for the Site;
• Section 4.0 -the Heath and Safety Plan;
• Section 5.0 -the Site management and sequencing;
• Section 6.0 -the Work Plan for the spillway construction, culvert
lining and drainage line construction;
• Section 7.0 -the Work Plan for the construction and implementation
of the Groundwater Extraction System component of the
RA;
• Section 8.0 -the Work Plan for the construction and implementation
of the Groundwater Treatment System construction;
• Section 9.0 -the Work Plan for the construction and implementation
of the SVE system;
• Section 10.0 -the Work Plan for the construction and future
implementation of the soil flushing system;
• Section 11. 0 the Long-Term Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring
Plan;
• Section 12.0 -reports and documentation to be submitted;
• Section 13.0 -the project closeout methodology;
• Section 14.0 -activities to be undertaken to provide community
relations support;
• Section 15.0 -the RA schedule of activities;
• Section 16.0 -the Construction Management Plan;
• Appendix A -the access agreements related to the Site;
• Appendix B -the Construction Health and Safety Plan for the Site;
• Appendix C -the Construction Quality Assurance Plan for the Site; and
• Appendix D -the Curricula Vitae for the assigned project personnel.
8 CONESTOCA·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
1.3 PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTION
The SOW delineates and describes in detail the RA to be
implemented at the Site. The major components of the RA to be
implemented at the Site consist of the following:
1) Excavation and repair of the damaged sections of the Site culvert
followed by slip-lining of the culvert with butt-welded polyethylene
pipe, construction of a gravity drainage line to carry uncontaminated
groundwater from the spring discharge to the Tributary B north of the
Former Operations Area and construction of a surface water diversion
consisting of a Site spillway.
2) Construction of a groundwater extraction system within the Site
boundaries including four extraction wells, in areas of elevated
contaminant levels, a subsurface drainage tile trench to collect
contaminated groundwater and a groundwater collection sump in the
annulus of the slip-lined culvert to collect groundwater that is
presently discharging to the culvert;
3) Construction of an on-Site treatment system. The system shall consist
of an equalization and aeration tank. The air vented from the aeration
tank will be treated by carbon adsorption. The effluent from the
treatment system will be pumped to the City of Mt. Holly sanitary
sewer system manhole for subsequent treatment at the publicly owned
treatment works (POTW);
4) Treatment of soils in the former landfill and approximately 500 c.y. of
soil from the Former Operations Area which are to be consolidated
into the former landfill; and
5) Construction of a soil flushing system utilizing some of the
components of the SVE system and installing a soil flushing collection
trench for future operation. This SVE system construction includes the
consolidation of surplus excavated soils from the groundwater
9 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
m
D
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
extraction system and treatment facility construction into a soil cap on
the surface of the former landfill.
1.4 PROTECT ORGANIZATION
CRA is the primary consultant to the Jadco-Hughes
Steering Committee for the RD portion of the RD/RA and will be performing
the construction management during the implementation of the RA.
Additional subcontractors will be selected to perform specific tasks during the
RA phase of the RD/RA. Project organization charts for the remedial
construction activities are provided in the Quality Assurance Project Plans for
construction activities, presented in Appendix C, for each phase of the
remedial construction.
1.5 BASIS FOR REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTION
The remedial construction for the RA selected for the Site
is based on the provisions of the SOW and the design for the RA of the Site as
presented in the Prefinal Design Report.
10 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.0
3669 {18)
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Jadco-Hughes Site is located between the Catawaba
River and the South Fork at the Catawaba River in a region known as the
Piedmont physiographic province in Gaston County. The region is primarily
rolling uplands although the county's western area contains some northeast
trending ridges.
The Site itself is flat, sloping slightly from south to north.
The southern elevation is approximately 666 feet above mean sea level
(AMSL) and the northern is approximately 653 feet AMSL.
The Site is located in an unincorporated area between the
cities of Belmont and Mt. Holly. The aerial photographs indicate that the Site
was farmland until the late 1960s and was subsequently used for a solvent
reclamation and waste storage facility until 1975.
The Site shows little evidence of past Site operation. The
majority of the 6-acre Site is revegetated. The southern and eastern
boundaries are treed. Remnants of the facility include: a fence (now replaced
with an 8-foot high barbed wire perimeter fence), a truck unloading area, a
concrete pad, culvert and building remnants.
Land to the south and east of the Site is wooded and
undisturbed. The eastern area adjacent to the Site is sloped steeply upwards
(to the east).
Land to the west of the Site is utilized for industrial
purposes. There is a former wood products plant to the southwest of the Site
and a textile machinery supply warehouse opposite the Site.
The area to the north of the Site is utilized for private
residences. A machine shop and automobile service center/wrecking yard are
also located among the residences.
11 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
D
D
u
I
I 3669 (18)
Drainage from the Site flows to tributaries of Fites Creek
and ultimately to the Catawaba River approximately 2.5 miles downstream.
Figure 2.1 illustrates the drainage pattern of the Site and downstream
watercourses.
The Site is predominantly underlain by a unit of
weathered granite known as saprolite to a depth of 95 feet below ground
surface. Lenses of fluvial deposits of clay, silt and sand lie upon this unit near
ground surface. Granite bedrock underlies the saprolite and is found at
depths below 95 feet. Figure 2.2 illustrates the geology underlying the Site by
means of Cross-section A-A' which transects the Site. The section location is
shown on Figure 2.1.
A water table is found at a depth of approximately 9 feet
below ground surface. Groundwater within the saprolite migrates north at a
rate of approximately 8 to 14 feet/year and is strongly influenced by
groundwater discharge into the on-Site culvert and tributaries to Fites Creek.
Figure 2.3 presents the groundwater flow patterns in the shallow saprolite
(approximately 15 feet below ground surface). Figure 2.4 presents the
groundwater flow patterns in the deep saprolite (approximately 45 fee~ below
ground surface). These groundwater contours are based on data collected
during the hydraulic monitoring round in May 1993 and are similar to the
contours presented in the RI.
The Site is fenced with an 8-foot high chain link and
barbed wire fence. This fence was installed in 1990 as part of a soil removal
program completed by the Steering Committee.
Contamination profiles for on-Site groundwater and soil
are presented in Section 3.1.2 of the Preliminary Design Report (CRA,
August 1993) and in Appendix B, Section B.2.0.
12 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I!!!!!
CRA
I!!!!!! 1!!119
----- -PROP(RTY LINE
GROUND CONTOUR (fl. Al.ISi..)
SURF ACE WATER ORAi NAG[
A·1 r CROSS-SECTION LOCATION
J669 (18) JAN 28/94(W) REV.O (P-56)
== == == r,;;;a liiiiiiiil lillil
0 50 \0011
I U I
1,
/ l
!!!!! l!l!!!!I l!l!!!!I l!!l!li!iS -= ==
A " >
660.0
(16.}Sll.f
670.0
(Sll)SANO
660.0 -·-·-
ai > <
g_ 650.0
z 0 =" ~ ~ 640.0 """'"'
630.0
620.0
== == ==
-----·-----
SAPROUTE UNIT
w z 3
(ML}SILf {JJl}SJt..1
l)J.111
-Ciiiiiil
w . ~ ... ~ ~~ I-!;. :::.::i; mo ,,,,,,._
liliii
-.. ~-· ~~~~
-
I ....
610.ol..------.----------.-----,------,-----
1
-.------,,~,~,,~,-~,
O JOO 600 900 1200 1500
HORIZONTAL OIST.WCE (FEET) (!>6.HO}
illllill.
CRA
3669 (18) JAN 10/94(W) R(V.O (X-08)
GROUND SURF AC(
STRATIGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION
STATIC WATER l£"'1:L (9/18/89)
UONITORlNG v.fil SCREEN LOCATION
GEOLOGIC
1800
figure 2.2
CROSS-SECTION A-A'
JADCO-HUGHES SITE
Goston County, NC
!!!!!I l!!!!!I !!!!!I !!l!!!!I l!!!!l!I !!!!!I
•"'""s
.Pl9S
=;>
---650
{"6.91)
f=)
CAA
PROPERTY LINE
SHALLOW MONITORING WEU
SHALLOW PIEZOI.IETER
CROUNOWA T£R FLOW DIRECTION
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR (FT. AMSl)
CROUNOWA T(R ELEVATION (A.PR1l lO,
WA T(R l[\l[L NOT l.l[ASURED
I
I
J669 (18) JAN 28/9~{W) R[V.O {P-57)
1993)
== == == == ==
0 50 100H
H I
figure 2.3
SHALLOW GROUNDWATER FLOW PATTERNS JADCO-HUGHES SITE
Gaston County. NC
iiiiil liiil
PROPERTY UN[
• "'""° O[(P IJONITOO!NG WELL
e Pl9'i DEEP PIEZOl.l[T(R
-'-Pwi PUMPING WELL
c=:::;>-CROUNOWAT(R fLOW OIR[CTION
----650 GROUNDWATER CONTOUR (fT. AIJSL)
{6!16.Xt) GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (APRIL JO, 1993)
(NJ,/) WATER LEVEL NOT IJ[ASUREO
I I
I I
I I
I I
liiiii
J \ :j__ ___ _
________ .,__·~-------------~ __ cr.s·o.v stNi
(r.11.&I) -·~ ""'
CRA
I
I
.J669 (18) JAN 28/94(W) R[V.O {P-58)
-liiiii liiii liiiiiia liiliiiia
0 50
H
DEEP
liiiia liiiia
!OOH
I
\
figure 2.4
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATTERNS
JADCO-HUGHES SITE
Goston County, NC
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.0
3669 (18)
ACCESS AGREEMENTS AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS
Implementation of the RA for the Site requires access
onto adjacent properties and obtaining various State, Federal and County
Permits.
Access agreements have been obtained for
implementation of the pre-design activities, and for implementation of the
RA on the properties adjacent to the south, east, west and north borders of the
Site. These access agreements have been submitted to USEPA under separate
cover and are included in Appendix A.
The Jadco-Hughes Site is a CERCLA Site and, thus, is not
required to obtain permits for activities conducted at the Site. In preparation
for the RA, the Steering Committee has developed a list of permit programs
for which the substantive requirements are to be identified and met by the
RA. These permit programs are listed below:
1. SVE
An air discharge permit application is to be filed to the State of North
Carolina for the SVE system discharge. The State has advised CRA that
no permit is required for this remediation system since the pilot study
provided a favorable evaluation of the SVE system and the best
available control technology will be utilized.
However, the State (Keith Overcash, Air Quality Section) requested in a
letter to CRA dated May 13, 1993 that the SVE system be registered with
the Division of Environmental Management, Mooresville Regional
Office by sending the following information:
• location of the Site;
• type and quantity of compounds expected to be emitted to the
ambient air;
• brief description of the remediation system components; and
13 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
• duration of time that the remediation system is expected to be
operated.
2. Groundwater Extraction
3.
4.
Extraction well permit applications will be filed for the groundwater
extraction system pursuant to State requirements.
POTW Discharge
A discharge permit will be obtained from the City of Mt. Holly in early
1994. This permit will have specific discharge limits for the Site. The
Jadco-Hughes Steering Committee completed its negotiations with the
City and an agreement which will lead to the issuance of a sewer
discharge permit was executed in-December 1993.
Sediment and Erosion Control
The State requires that a permit be obtained when any construction
occurs on an area which exceeds one acre. The substantive
requirements outlined in the North Carolina Erosion Control Design
Manual will be incorporated in a Sediment and Erosion Control Plan
to be provided in the Final Design. This plan will document site
features and control measures to be implemented during construction
and in the long-term to prevent erosion of soil and associated sediment
migration.
5. Miscellaneous Permit Requirements
Miscellaneous permit requirements include building permits and
electric utility permits. The Steering Committee will assign the
responsibility of obtaining these miscellaneous permits to the selected
RA Contractor(s).
14 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.0
3669 (18)
CONSTRUCTION HEAL TH AND SAFETY PLAN
A Construction Health and Safety Plan (HASP) is required
to ensure that all remedial construction activities are performed safely and in
accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, and that all persons on
Site, the general public and the environment are protected from exposure to
Site-related contaminated material during implementation of the remedial
construction activities at the Site. A HASP has been developed for the
remedial construction activities associated with the RA for the Site and is
presented in Appendix B.
Each employer involved in remedial construction
activities at the Site will be required to develop and implement their own
Site-specific HASP for activities they will perform at the Site. The HASP
included in Appendix B will form the basis and minimum requirements for
each employer's Site-specific HASP.
The remedial contractors will prepare and submit a HASP
to CRA before commencing work at the Site which could potentially result in
contact with contaminated materials. CRA will review the HASP with
respect to its consistency with Appendix B and the Contract requirements and
approve the HASP prior to its implementation.
CRA will also receive and review requisite training and
medical surveillance documentation for contractor employees.
15 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
D
D
I
I
0
u
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.0
3669 (18)
SITE MANAGEMENT AND SEQUENCING
The five components of the remedial construction at the
. Site are described in Section 1.0 and are generally described as follows:
1) culvert replacement/ spillway construction.
2) groundwater extraction system;
3) groundwater treatment system;
4) SVE system; and
5) soil flushing system.
Management of the Site during implementation of the
remedial construction will be required to ensure that the Site operates in an
orderly, efficient and safe manner, and to ensure that the remedial
construction is successfully implemented in accordance with the RD. The
tasks to complete the five components of the remedial construction have
been sequenced to meet the following major objectives:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
tasks should be performed in an orderly and safe manner such that the
movement and double handling of materials and the exposure of
personnel and the public to Site-related contaminants is minimized;
tasks should be scheduled such that movement of contaminated
materials over clean areas is avoided or minimized, and sequencing of
tasks should result in the exclusion zone diminishing in size as the RA
is implemented;
tasks should be performed to encourage stormwater percolation. This
would serve the dual purpose of preventing potentially contaminated
run-off from leaving the Site and promoting the flushing of residual
contaminants from the soil to the groundwater collection system; and
upon completion of grading and excavation activities, the contractor
should perform the work under conditions not requiring air
monitoring or decontamination activities such that 40-hour OSHA
trained workers are not required for construction activities.
16 CONESTOGA·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
Sequencing of the remedial construction tasks is presented in Sections 6.0
to 11.0.
5.1 REMEDIAL ACTION CONTRACTOR SELECTION
A remedial contractors will be selected by a competitive
bidding process. Bids will be solicited from qualified remedial contractors for
performance of the remedial construction and for the installation of
extraction wells. A contract reflecting the requirements of the RA Work Plan,
the Final Design Report, the SOW and standard contract administration
requirements will be entered into by the Steering Committee and the
successful remedial contractor(s).
The first activity to be completed by the selected remedial
contractor is the preparation and submission (to CRA) of a Site-specific HASP
for the work to be completed at the Site. The discussion of the sequencing of
activities in Sections 6:0 through 10.0, below, do not include this task as a
separate activity, since it will be completed at the start of construction for all
phases of the work.
All contractors retained by the Steering Committee will be
required to prepare and submit a HASP before commencing work involving
the excavation or handling of soils at the Site.
5.2 SITE MANAGEMENT
Site activities related to the remedial construction will be
supervised by a qualified engineer. Daily logs will be maintained for all
activities occurring at the Site during remedial construction activities.
Besides daily monitoring of the remedial construction activities, weekly
progress meetings will be conducted with the remedial contractor(s) and
monthly progress meetings will be conducted during the pedod of active
construction with the remedial contractor(s), the Steering Committee and
17 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
USEPA. Details of Site management during implementation of the remedial
construction activities are presented in Appendix C.
18 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.0
3669 (18)
SPILLWAY. CULVERT AND DRAINAGE LINE
6.1 STATEMENT OF WORK
The first component of the RA to be implemented at the
Site is the construction of the spillway and drainage line, lining of the existing
on-Site culvert, and associated activities. These items are expected to be
completed within 135 days of USEPA approval of the RA Work Plan or Final
Design Report, whichever is later. Installation of the spillway and drainage
line and culvert lining consists of the following activities:
i) mobilization of labor, materials and equipment to the Site;
ii) clearing, grubbing and grading of soil to create clean, level areas for the
location of temporary Site offices, support facilities and parking during
the implementation of the RA;
iii) placing of granular material on access roads and on temporary parking
area;
iv) installation of temporary support facilities (Site offices, support trailers,
toilet facilities, etc.);
v) construction of a vehicle decontamination facility and installation of a
personnel hygiene facility;
vi) excavation of clean on-Site soils or importation of clean fill and the
construction of earthen berms along the southeastern perimeter of the
Site and the eastern foot of the landfill slope;
vii) excavation to expose the damaged portion of the culvert, cleaning of
the culvert, reparation of the damaged section of the culvert,
backfilling of the repaired section of the culvert, and installation of the
slip lining;
19 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
Ii
ii
I
I
' I
' I,
I
I ,,
I 3669 (18)
viii) construction of a precast concrete chamber at the north end of the
culvert, blockage of the concrete culvert on the downstream side of the
chamber, and installation of a sump pump; and
ix) excavation, placing and backfilling of the drainage line on the
southeast portion of the property, including precast concrete manholes.
The design drawings for the spillage, culvert and drainage
line will be presented in the Final Design Report.
6.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND ORA WINGS
Construction specifications for the implementation of the
spillway, culvert and drainage line component of the RA at the Site and
associated drawings will be presented in the Final Design Report.
6.3 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
The Construction Quality Assurance Plan (CQAP) for the
spillway, culvert and drainage line component of the RA is provided in
Appendix C. Where applicable, the requirements of the CQAP have been
incorporated into the construction specifications, provided in the Final
Design Report.
6.4 IMPLEMENTATION AND SEQUENCING
6.4.1 Site Preparation
Prior to commencing remedial construction activities at
the Site, the Site will be cleared, grubbed and graded as required in the areas of
the Site offices, support facilities and parking. A 6-inch layer of granular
20 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I ,,
I
' rt
' I ,,
I
I
' I'
i
I
I
' I
I 3669 08)
material will be distributed over the parking area and a 12-inch layer of
granular material will be placed on the access roads.
Site offices and support facilities will then be installed,
including power and telephone hookups. Temporary piping will be installed
from a potable water tank (supplied by the RA Contractor) or a temporary
connection to municipal water supply to the Site offices and personnel
decontamination facility. Sanitary solid waste will be placed in a dumpster
near the support facilities. The RA Contractor will arrange for periodic
disposal of these wastes.
6.4.2 Construction of Spillway, Culvert Lining and
Construction of Drainage Line
The construction of the spillway, the culvert lining, and
the construction of the drainage line will then commence as shown on the
construction drawings which will be detailed in the Final Design Report.
6.4.3 Construction Closeout
Upon completion of the activities associated with the
construction of the spillway and drainage line and the lining of the culvert,
associated construction equipment not required for subsequent construction
activities, will be decontaminated and then removed from the Site. Support
facilities, structures and temporary controls (i.e. temporary fencing, sediment
controls) are expected to remain in place.
6.5 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
The schedule of activities for the implementation of the
spillway, culvert and drainage line component of the RA activities at the Site
is presented in Section 15.0 (activity No. 5).
21 CONESTOCA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I ,,
' I ,,
I
I
I
I
I
' I
/I
I
I
I
I ,,, 3669 (18)
This schedule is approximate and is dependent upon
contractor availability, equipment availability and delays due to the weather,
This schedule is to be used for construction planning purposes only,
22 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I ,, ,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
7.0
3669 08)
GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION SYSTEM
7.1 STATEMENT OF WORK
The second component of the RA to be implemented at
the Site is the construction and commissioning of a groundwater extraction
system at the Site, and associated activities. The groundwater extraction
systems will also be completed concurrently with the construction of the Site
spillway and culvert repairs and with the construction of portions of the
groundwater treatment system. The groundwater extraction system is
expected to be completed within 180 days of USEPA approval of the RA Work
Plan or the Final Design Report, whichever is later. Installation of the
groundwater extraction system consists of the following activities:
i) mobilization of labor, materials, equipment and temporary support
facilities to the Site;
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
clearing, grubbing and regrading along the alignment of the proposed
tile drain and pipeline areas to create a level work area;
installation of sump manhole in the northwestern corner of the Site,
including sump pump and pipeline connection to the treatment
facility;
excavation, placing and backfilling with granular material in the tile
drain alignment, equipped with intermediate and terminal manholes
at all changes of pipe line and grade and spaced no greater than 250 feet;
excavation, placing and backfilling of yard piping and/or carrier pipes
which will connect the extraction wells and extraction drain sump to
the treatment facility, equipped with intermediate and terminal precast
concrete chambers;
installation of control and power conduits;
23 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOOATES
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
' t
I
·u
D
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
vii) installation of the extraction wells and access manhole mechanical and
electrical components; and
viii) commissioning the entire groundwater extraction system.
The design for the groundwater extraction system will be
presented in the Final Design Report.
7.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS
Construction specifications for the implementation of the
groundwater extraction system component of the RA at the Site will be
presented in the Final Design Report.
7.3 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
The CQAP for the installation of the groundwater
extraction system component of the RA, is provided in Appendix C. Where
applicable, the requirements of the CQAP have been incorporated into the
construction specifications provided in the Final Design Report.
7.4 IMPLEMENTATION AND SEQUENCING
7.4.1 Site Preparation
The Site will be prepared as discussed in Section 6.4.1.
7.4.2 Installation of Extraction Wells, Tile Drain and Pipeline
Construction of the.pipeline, tile drain, manholes, sump
manhole, conduits, power and control wiring to the groundwater treatment
24 CONESTOCA·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
u c-
/8
I
fi
' I ~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
8
B
I
I 3669 (15)
buildings and access road for the groundwater extraction systems will be
completed to final grade as shown on the construction drawings which will
be provided in the Final Design Report.
Extraction wells adjacent to the pipeline manholes,
mechanical and electrical components for each extraction well, and the
discharge pipeline from each extraction well to the nearest pipeline manhole
will be installed as shown on the construction drawings in the Final Design
Report.
7,4,3 Construction Closeout
Upon completion of the construction activities associated
with the installation of the groundwater extraction system, construction
equipment and support facilities not necessary for subsequent construction
activities will be removed from the Site, Support facilities, structures and
temporary controls are expected to remain in place,
7.5 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
The schedule of activities for the implementation of the
groundwater extraction system component of the RA activities at the Site is
presented in Section 15,0 (activity No. 6). The commissioning of groundwater
extraction system will occur after completion of the groundwater treatment
system construction.
This schedule is approximate and is dependent upon
contractor availability, equipment availability and delays due to the weather.
This schedule is to be used for construction planning purposes only.
25 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
B
I
I
I
' I
I
I -
I
I
I
I
8
B
I
I
8.0 GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
8.1 ST A TEMENT OF WORK
The third component of the RA to be implemented at the
Site is the construction and commissioning of a groundwater treatment
system at the Site, and associated activities. The construction and
commissioning of the groundwater treatment system is expected to be
completed within 250 days of USEPA approval of the Final Design Report or
the RA Work Plan, whichever is later. The construction of the groundwater
treatment system component of the RA consists of the following activities:
i) mobilization of labor, materials, equipment and temporary support
facilities to the Site;
ii) clearing, grubbing and regrading of work area;
iii) excavation and installation of foundations for the groundwater
treatment building;
iv) construction of the groundwater treatment building;
v) installation and commissioning of utilities to the groundwater
treatment building;
vi) installation of the groundwater treatment system equipment and
controls;
vii) construction of the groundwater treatment facility discharge pipe; and
viii) commissioning the groundwater treatment system.
The design for the groundwater treatment system will be
presented in the Final Design Report.
C0NESTOCA-R0VERS & ASS0OATES
I
I
I ·.,
11
'
I
I
I
' I
' I
I
I
I
I
I .,.
I
I
I Jl,69 08)
8.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND ORA WINGS
Construction specifications for the implementation of the
groundwater treatment component of the RA at the Site will be presented in
the Final Design Report.
8.3 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
The CQAP for the installation of the groundwater
treatment system component of the RA, is provided in Appendix C. Where
applicable, the requirements of the CQAP have been incorporated into the
construction specifications provided in the Final Design Report.
8.4 IMPLEMENTATION AND SEQUENCING
8.4.1 Site Preparation
The Site will be prepared as discussed in Section 6.4.1.
8.4.2 Construction and Commissioning of the
Groundwater Treatment System
The construction of the groundwater treatment building
and system will then commence, including the construction of the discharge
pipeline, as shown on the construction drawings which will be provided in
the Final Design Report. The groundwater treatment system will then be
commissioned as detailed in the Draft Operation and Maintenance Plan
referenced in Section 11.0.
27 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & AsSOOATES
0
I
I
I
I
••
I
1·
I
I
t
I ff
m
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 OS)
8.4.3 Construction Closeout
Upon completion of the activities associated with the
construction of groundwater treatment facility, construction equipment and
support facilities not necessary for subsequent construction activities will be
removed from the Site. Support facilities, structures and temporary controls
are expected to remain in place .
8.5 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
The schedule of activ_ities for the implementation of the
groundwater treatment component of the RA activities at the Site is
presented in Section 15.0 (activity No. 7).
This schedule is approximate and is dependent upon
contractor availability, equipment availability and delays due to the weather.
This schedule is to be used for construction planning purposes only.
28 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOOATES
I
I
I
m
R
0
I
I
' I
I
I
I
9.0
3669 (18)
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM
9.1 STATEMENT OF WORK
The fourth component of the RA to be implemented at
the Site is the construction and commissioning of the SVE system at the Site,
and associated activities. The SVE system construction and commissioning
are expected to be completed within 250 days after USEP A approval of the RA
Work Plan or the Final Design Report, whichever is later. Implementation of
the SVE system component of the RA consists of the following activities:
i)
ii)
iii)
mobilization of labor, materials, equipment and temporary support
facilities to the Site;
set up of the SVE treatment system and associated work, including
installation of the soil vapor extraction trenches and construction of
the vapor phase treatment system;
installation of a soil cap over the former landfill; and
iv) SVE system commissioning.
The final design for SVE is presented in the Final Design
Report.
9.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS
Construction specifications for the implementation of the
SVE system component of the RA at the Site will be presented in the Final
Design Report.
29 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
u
u
a
m
I
11
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Jl,69 08)
9.3 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
The CQAP for the installation and construction of the
SVE system component of the RA, is provided in Appendix C.
9.4 IMPLEMENTATION AND SEQUENCING
9.4.1 Site Preparation
The Site will be prepared as discussed in Section 6.4.1.
9.4.2 SVE Trenches and Pipeline
Construction of the pipeline, extraction trench, conduits,
power and control wiring to the SVE treatment equipment will be completed
as shown on the construction drawings in the Final Design Report.
9.4.3 Construction and Commissioning of the
SVE Treatment System
The construction of' the SVE treatment system will then
commence as shown on the construction drawings in the Final Design
Report. The SVE treatment system will be commissioned as referenced in the
Draft Operation and Maintenance Plan presented in Section 11.0.
9.4.4 Construction Closeout
Upon completion of the construction activities associated
with the installation of the SVE collection system and construction of the
SVE treatment facility, associated construction equipment not required for
subsequent construction activities will be removed from the Site. Support
facilities, structures and temporary controls are expected to remain in place.
30 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & Asso□ATES
I
R
u
n
8
0
u:
8
I
u
I
I
a
a
I
•
I
I
I 3669 08)
9.5 SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
The schedule of activities for the construction and
implementation of the SVE system component of the RA activities at the Site
is presented in Section 15.0 (activity No. 9).
This schedule is approximate and is dependent upon
contractor availability, equipment availability and delays due to the weather.
This schedule is to be used for construction planning purposes only.
31 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOOATES
a
u
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10.0 SOIL FLUSHING SYSTEM
3669 (18)
10.1 STATEMENT OF WORK
The fifth component of the RA to be implemented at the
Site is the soil flushing system. The soil flushing system will be constructed
during the RA but will not be commissioned until the SVE system operation
is terminated. The components of the soil flushing system may require
modification after the termination of the SVE system operation. These
modifications may be necessary in order to address conditions which may
have changed since the installation of the soil flushing system
(i.e. settlement). The soil flushing system construction will be completed
concurrently with the SVE system installation, which is expected to be
completed within 225 days after USEPA approval of the RA Work Plan or the
Final Design Report, whichever is later. Implementation of the soil flushing
system component of the RA consists of the following activities:
i)
ii)
mobilization of labor, materials, equipment and temporary support
facilities to the Site; and
installation of the soil flushing collection trench and associated piping
and equipment to the groundwater treatment facility for future
operation.
The final design of the soil flushing system is presented in
the Final Design Report, however, full operation will only be completed after
operation of the SVE system is terminated.
10.2 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS AND ORA WINGS
Construction specifications for the implementation of the
soil flushing component of the RA at the Site will be presented in the Final
Design Report.
32 C0NESTOCA-R0VERS & AsS0OATES
I
I
I
I
fl
u
I
I
D
n
D
I
I
8
ff
u
u
0
0 3669 (18)
10.3 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
The CQAP for the soil flushing component of the RA, is
provided in Appendix C.
10.4 IMPLEMENTATION AND SEQUENCING
10.4.1 Site Preparation
The Site will be prepared as discussed in Section 6.4.1.
10.4.2 Soil Flushing Extraction Trench, Pipeline and
Infiltration Galleries
Installation of the soil flushing extraction trench, pipeline,
conduits, power and control wiring to the groundwater treatment building
will be completed as shown on the construction drawings in the Final Design
Report. Modifications to the SVE system which will be used in the soil
flushing system will be completed after shut-off of the SVE system, as shown
in the Final Design Report.
10.4.3 Commissioning of the Soil Flushing System
The operation of the soil flushing system will commence
after operation of the SVE system is terminated as determined in accordance
with the Remediation Goal Verification Plan. The soil flushing system will
be described as referenced in the Draft Operations and Maintenance Plan
presented in Section 11.0.
33 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
10.4.4 Construction Closeout
Upon completion of the construction activities associated
with the installation of the soil flushing system, all construction equipment
and support facilities, including Site offices and temporary controls, will be
removed from the Site.
10.4.5 Schedule of Activities
The schedule of activities for the construction and
implementation of the soil flushing system component of the RA activities at
the Site is presented in Section 15.0 (activity No. 10).
This schedule is approximate and is dependent upon
contractor availability, equipment availability and delays due to the weather.
This schedule is to be used for construc~ion planning purposes only.
34 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
R
u
u
I
u
I
I
E
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
11.0 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
3669 08)
As required by the SOW, an Operation and Maintenance
Plan (O&M Plan) for the remedial components will be developed and will be
submitted as outlined (activity No. 8) in the RA Schedule (Section 15.0).
The O&M Plan will be consistent with the requirements
of the SOW and will include the following:
i) equipment startup and operator training;
ii) description of normal operation and maintenance;
iii) description of potential problems;
iv) description of routine monitoring and laboratory testing of treatment
systems;
v) description of alternate O&M;
vi) health and safety plan;
vii) description of equipment; and
viii) records of reporting.
35 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
0
u
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I
I
12.0 PROJECT DOCUMENTATION AND REPORTING
3669 (18)
As required by the SOW, monthly reports will be
submitted to USEPA. Meetings with USEPA will be held at USEPA's request
at the conclusion of each phase of the RA and in accordance with the
Construction Quality Assurance Plan (CQAP-Appendix C) .
36 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
13.0 PROTECT CLOSEOUT
3669 08)
On completion of the remedial construction as detailed in
Sections 6.0 to 10.0, all construction equipment, facilities, and temporary
controls will be removed, and the Site will be left in a clean and orderly
fashion. Long-term operation and maintenance of the remedial action then
will commence according to the requirements of the draft O&M Plan
referenced in Section 11.0.
Prefinal Inspection
Upon preliminary project completion the Steering
Cammi ttee will notify USEP A for the purpose of conducting a Prefinal
Inspection. Participants will include the Project Manager, Project Engineer,
Supervising Contractor, Construction Contractor, and other Federal, State,
and local agencies with a jurisdictional interest. The Prefinal Inspection will
consist of a walk through inspection of the entire project site. The objective
' of the inspection is to determine whether the project is complete and
consistent with the Order. Any outstanding construction items discovered
during the inspection will be identified and noted on a punch list.
Additionally, treatment equipment will be operationally tested by the
Steering Committee. The Steering Committee will certify that the equipment
has performed to effectively meet the purpose and intent of the specifications.
Retesting will be completed where deficiencies are revealed. A Prefinal
Inspection Report will be submitted which outlines the outstanding
construction items, actions required to resolve the items, completion date for
the items, and an anticipated date for the Final Inspection.
Final Inspection
Upon completion of all outstanding construction items,
the Steering Committee will notify USEPA for the purposes Qf conducting a
Final Inspection. The Final Inspection will consist of a walk-through
inspection of the entire project Site. The Prefinal Inspection Report will be
used as a check list with the Final Inspection focusing on the outs tan ding
construction items identified in the Prefinal Inspection. All tests that were
37 CONESTOGA·ROVERS & AsSOCIATES
'ffl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
originally unsatisfactory will be conducted again. Confirmation will be made
during the Final Inspection that all outstanding items have been resolved.
Any outstanding construction items discovered during the inspection still
requiring correction will be identified and noted on a punch list. If any items
are still unresolved, the inspection will be considered to be a Prefinal
Inspection requiring another Prefinal Inspection Report and subsequent Final
Inspection.
38 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
14.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS SUPPORT
3669 {18)
As described in the RD Work Plan, the Steering
Committee is committed to supporting USEP A's community relations
program for the RD/RA to be conducted at the Jadco-Hughes Site.
As USEPA has assumed the lead position on all
community relations activities, the Steering Committee will provide
technical support to USEP A at all public meetings. The Steering Committee
will provide assistance to USEPA through its Project Coordinator. Assistance
will include the provision of information to be used in community relations
efforts and technical representation at public meetings and information
sessions by personnel familiar with the RD/RA activities to be conducted.
USEPA will have overall authority for coordinating
community relations activities and ensuring that the public is kept informed.
As part of these community relations activities, USEPA has the opportunity
to review information and comment during the progress of the RD/RA. The
community relations activities to be conducted by USEPA will:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
familiarize area residents with the RD/RA process;
keep area residents and other interested parties informed of the
RD /RA activities to be conducted, especially with regard the on-Site
activities;
provide a mechanism for input to the RD/RA;
provide a channel of communication for responding to Site-specific
contamination issues; and
ensure that all regulatory requirements concerning community
relations are met.
39 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
R
u 15.0 REMEDIAL ACTION SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
I A preliminary RA schedule was developed and included
in Section 7.0 of the Preliminary Design Report. The final RA schedule is
B shown on Figure 15.1.
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18) 40 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
~ == == ee 1!!!11!!9 1!!!119 em 1!!!19 ee
DURATION DAYS
ACTl\1TY 7 " I ,, •• I 60 I 77 I 91 I 165 I "' I 1J3 I 1~1 I '" I 17s I 169 I 20J I 2i1 I rn I 2◄s 259 I 273 I 2a1 I 001 I J1s I J29 I J-4J I Js1 I 071 i Jas I
1. USEPA APPR0VAl. OF RA WORK Pt.AN.· .. '
RD.IEDI'°' TION COAL \IERIF"ICA TIC>-4 Pt.AN,
O k 1.1 PLAN. ANO fltU,l. DESICH ,. COl,tPCllTI\.'E BIOOINC · . ...
J.. PRECONSlRUCTION CONf(RCNC£ .. '-
◄. CONTRACTOR UOOIUZATION • ·-'-
5. SPILLWAY, CIJL\l(Rf ANO ORAINACC UN( •
5.1 SP1llWAY CONSTRVCTIOH
5.2 Ct.llVERT REPAIRS ANO SUP-Umt-10
INSTALlA TION
5.J ORAlNAC( UN[ CONSlRUCTION
6. CROUNOWA T[R CXTRACTICI-I SYSTEM· . . . . . ..
6.1 EXlRACTION WELL INSTALLATION
6.2 TILE DRAIN CONSTRUCTION
6.J PIPELINE CCf,ISTRUCTION
6.◄ CROUNDWAl"ER cxnv,cncr,i SYSTEM
COMl.nSSION!NC
7. GROJNDWATER TR[AT\IEHT S'rSTtU· . . . . .. ..
7.1 CROUND\YAt(R TR[An.tOH BULDINC
7.2 ~d:~1~~ lR[ATM£NT SYSTCM
[OUIPU[NT ANO INSTRUMENTATION
INSTAI..LATION
7.J GROUNDWATER TR[Al\.l[NT svsrru
COMUJSSIOtllNG ,. 0 lo U Pl.All (RE',1SIONS) ... I I I I I ,. SOIL VAPOR EXTIUCTION SYSlCM • ..
9.1 SOil VAPOR EXTRACTION TRENCH
INST Al..LA llON
9.2 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM
CONSTRUCTION
9.J SOIL CAP INSTAUATION
9.4 SOIL VAPOR [XffiACTIOH SYSTE:M
COUl,IISSU)N!NG
"· SOIL rt.USHING SYSTE:M • . . . . .. . . . . . . . ..
10.1 SOil rUJSHING SYST[M ca..u:cnON
lR[NCH INSTAUATION
10.2 SOIL rt.VSHING SYSTE:M [OJ!PI.IE:NT
INSTAUATIC>N
11. CONSTRUCTION a.OSCOIJT mo .. .. I I I I I
1
O[MOOIUZA lKlN
12. PRrf\NAL INSPECTION REPOOt PRE:PARATION· I
IJ. VSEPA PRlJ1NAL INsPE:CnoN • . . . . . . . . . .. . . ..
14. VSEPA flHAL INSPCCTI0-1 • . . ..... I
15. RA R[PORT PR[PARATlON· HI I 111 111 I "· VS£PA Rc-,,[W RA R[PORT • I I I I I I I
17. SYS T[M CP£RA TION • • • . . . . . . . .. I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1
l£GEND NOTt:: TiaS scm:ou.c IS TE:NTATM: \lillH R[SP[Cl figure 15.1
TO TH[ INOMDVAL [LEMENTS IN Tit[ SOiEOUtL RA SCHEDULE CONTIHVOUS ACTI'.UY THC SCLECT(O R[MEDIAL CONTRACTOR MAY
MOOIFY TH( LNT[R!M COMPLETION OATES. PROV.OED JADCO-HUGHES SITE THAT Tl-£ OAT[ FOR THE COl,IP\.[TION Of lHE • EvtNT 0EMOOU2ATIO,f (DAY :27J) ANO USEPA LNSP[CTIONS Coston County, NC
CRA (OAYS 238 mo 266) AR( MET.
J669 (18) JAN 28/94(W) REV.1 (S 05)
I
u
B
u
I
I
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
16.0 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN
This section presents the Construction Management Plan
as required by the SOW.
As the Supervising Contractor, CRA has assembled the
following project management team and technical resource personnel with
the necessary experience and capabilities required for the project. CRA's
project management team will consist of Rick Shepherd; Steve Quigley;
Jeanne Chew, Wolfe Engler; Mark Guthrie; Ian McRae; Mike Mateyk; Steve
Day and Mitchel Bergner. Brief descriptions of all personnel roles and
qualifications are listed below, and curricula vitae are included in
Appendix D. Figure 16.1 presents an organizational chart for the project team
and assigned personnel.
R. Shepherd -Principal-In-Charge
-provides overall corporate project management
-ensures professional services provided by CRA are cost effective and of
highest quality
-ensures all resources of CRA are available on an as-required basis
-managerial and technical guidance to CRA's Project Coordinator
-final review of CRA submittals prior to issue
S. Quigley -Project Manager
-designated Project Coordinator under Order
-supervisor of engineering project team members during the development
of Work Plans, Contract Documents and Specifications and reports to State
and Federal Agencies
-technical manager of RA field activities
-administrator of project costs and schedule
-coordination of CRA's technical group
T. Chew -Project Engineer
-assists Project Manager in engineering team supervision
-provides Construction Quality Assurance assistance
-assists in completion of RA field activities
3669 08) 41 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
R
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RD/RA
TECHNICAL ADv1SORS
MARK GUTHRIE
WOLF£ ENGLER
MITCHELL BERGNER
TECHNICAL STAFF
CAA
PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
RICK SHEPHERD
PROJECT MANAGER
STEVc QUIGLEY
PROJECT ENGINEER
JEANNE CHEW
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY CONTRACT HYDROGEOLOGIST TECHNICAL ADv1SOR ADMINISTRATOR
STEVE DAY
PROJECT STAFF
/AN McRAE MIKE MATEYK
HYDROGEOLOGIC
FIELD STAFF
figure 16.1
PROJECT ORGANIZA TlON
JADCO-HUGHES SITE
Goston County, NC
3669 (18) JAN 28/94(W) REV.1 (C-O5)
u
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 {18)
W. Engler -RA Technical Advisor
-provides technical assistance to CRA's project coordinator during
preparation for RA field activities
M. Guthrie -RD Technical Advisor
-provides technical review of project designs and specifications
-supervises project design staff
I. McRae -Contract Administrator
-development of Bid Documents
-provides assistance to project design staff in the preparation of project
specifications
-coordination of competitive bidding
-administration of contracts (bonds, insurance, payment certificates,
contract addenda, change orders)
M. Mateyk -Hydrogeologic Technical Advisor
-development of hydrogeologic components associated with preparation of
RA documents
-provides hydrogeologic expertise support function for reporting to State
and Federal Agencies
S. Day -Analytical Chemistry Technical Advisor
-provides technical assistance to Quality Assurance/Quality Control
(QA/QC) personnel during preparation of the RA documents
-provides analytical expertise support function for reporting to State and
Federal Agencies
M. Bergner -Project Industrial Hygienist
-provides technical assistance to CRA's Project Coordinator for
development and implementation of the health and safety program
components of the Plan
-reviews Contractor(s') health and safety plans
42 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
m
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I »
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
Subcontractors will be selected to perform specific tasks
during remedial design phases.
The Steering Committee has contracted ENSECO-Air
Toxics and ENSECO-Rocky Mountain Analytical to perform analytical testing
for the RD/RA.
The RA portion of the work is to be undertaken by
qualified contractors selected in a prequalified bidding process. The remedial
action will be administered and monitored by the Supervising Contractor and
overseen by USEP A.
USEPA will be notified of the start date for construction.
During the RA, should significant changes to the construction schedule or to
the construction activities occur, USEPA will be notified of these changes.
43 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
m
m
m
ffl
D
0
D
u APPENDIX A
I
ACCESS AGREEMENTS
m
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669
m
I
m
I
u
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AUG O 2 19-91i
July 17, 1991 Reference No. 3669
ACCESS AGREEMENT
I grant permission to the Jadco-Hughes steering committee, including its
Contractors and representatives, and the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and its representatives to enter my property in Belmont, NC to
perform all activities related to soil and·groundwater treatment and associated
cxca·:ating, grading, cor:struction, well installations, sample collection and data
collection activities as required by the EPA Administrative Order Docket No. 91-31-C
for the Remedial Design/Remedial Action at the Jadco-Hughes Superfund Site.
,i 7/WL . O~fg /~~
Name:
Date: \
cc. Ms. Barbara Benoy, EPA, Region IV
Mr. Reuben Bussey, EPA, Region IV
Charles H. Tisdale, Esq., King & Spalding
Mr. Richard Shepherd, CRA
Mr. Steve Quigley, CRA
July 17, 1991 Reference No. 3669
ACCESS AGREEMENT
I grant permission to the Jadco-Hughes steering committee, including its
Contractors and representatives, and the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and its representatives to enter my property in Belmont, NC to
· perform all activities related to soil and groundwater treatment and associated
excavating, grading, construction, well installations, sample collection and data
collection activities as required by the EPA Administrative Order Docket No. 91-31-C
for the Remedial Design/Remedial Action at the Jadco-Hughes Superfund Site.
Name:
Date:
cc. Mr. John Plecnik, 11 Spruce Pine, Belmont, NC
Ms. Barbara Benoy, EPA, Region. IV
Mr. Reuben Bussey, EPA, Region IV
Charles H. Tisdale, Esq., King & Spalding
Mr. Richard Shepherd, CRA
Mr. Steve Quigley, CRA
28012
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
m
0
B
fi
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
September 11, 1991
-

3

-
CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Consulting Engineers
Reference No. 3669
ACCESS AGREEMENT
I grant permission to the Jadco-Hughes Steering Committee, including its
Contractors and representatives, and the USEPA and its representatives to enter my
property to perform field investigations as required for the RD for the Jadco-Hughes
Site.
Name:
Date:
c.c.: Ms. Barbara Benoy, USEP A, Region IV
Mr. Reuben Bussey, USEPA, Region IV
Mr. Benton Leach, Uniroyal
Mr. Charles H. Tisdale
Mr. Richard Shepherd
Mr. Mike Mateyk
Mr. Ron Frehner
Mr. Steve Quigley
Conditional Note:
As CEO of Textile Sales & Repair Inc., we will grant the above access agreerrent
only if you repair the damage to our drain line caused by the drilling of one
of your wells (MW-13S or MW-130). This repair work must be completed before
any more wells are drilled on our property. If you have any questions, you
may contact rre at 704-827-0115.
Thank you,
Robert J. Baucom
CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Consulting Engineers
November 10, 1992 Reference No. 3669
-3-
ACCESS AGREEMENT
I grant permission to the Jadco-Hughes Steering Committee, including its
Contractors and representatives, and the United States Environmental Protection
Agency and its representatives to enter my property located at 700 Cason Street,
Belmont, North Carolina to perform field investigations as required by the
Unilateral Administrative Order for Remedial Design and Remedial Action, EPA
Docket No. 91-31-C.
Name:
Date:
c.c.: Ms. Barbara Benoy, USEP A, Region IV
Mr. Jimmy Kirkland
Mr. Richard Shepherd
Mr. Steve Quigley
g
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SEIIT tll :nVLIUAI 1.1,, .-.ir.rvo., • --· w · --···-·
April 2.0, 1993
·3-
CONESTOGA-AOVER& & A880CIATl:!I UIIITI:D
C-Hlnt ..,.._.
Reference No. 3669
ACCfS.'i AGBEEMENJ'
I grant pmnhsion to the Jadco-Hughes Steering Committee, Including iti;
Contractors ind repl'eMJ\tative1, and the United Statel Bnvironment.!11 P:iotedion
Agency and Its repruentatlvei to enter my property located at 778 Cason Street.
Belmont, North Carolina to pl!l'form field lnveatigati.ona as ff<J.Ulred by the
Unllateral Administrative Order for Remedial Design and Remedial Action, F.PA
Docket No. 91·31-C.
Name;
Date:
c;.c.: Ms. Barbara !xnoy, tJSEPA, Region IV
Mr. Jimmy Kirkland
Mr. Rlchard Shepherd
Mr. Steve Quigley
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX B,
I
CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3669 (18)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
~
B.1.0 GENERAL. .................................................................................................................. B-1
B.2.0 SITE CHARACTERJZATION ................................................................................. B-3
B.3.0 BASIS ........................................................................................................................... B-4
B.4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES AND ADMINISTRATION ............................................... B-6
B.5.0 MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE .................................................................................. B-8
B.6.0 TRAINING ................................................................................................................. B-9
B.7.0 SITE WORK ZONES AND WORK ACTIVITIES .............................................. B-10
B.8.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) ................................................. B-12
B.9.0 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM ....................................................... B-15
B.10.0 PERSONAL HYGIENE .......................................................................................... B-17
B.11.0 AIR MONITORJNG .............................................................................................. B-19
B.12.0 COMMUNICATIONS ........................................................................................... B-21
B.13.0 EMERGENCY AND FIRST AID EQUIPMENT ............................................... B-22
B.14.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN ....................................................................... B-23
B.14.1 OFF-SITE CONTINGENCY PLAN ...................................................... B-23
B.14.2 ON-SITE CONTINGENCY PLAN ....................................................... B-23
B.15.0 EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL DECONTAMINATION ......................... B-25
B.16.0 CONTAMINATION MIGRATION CONTROL. ................. : ........................... B-26
3669 {18) CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
B.17.0 CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURE ...................................................... B-27
B.17.1 DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................... B-27
B.17.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS ...................................................................... B-28
B.17.3 PROCEDURE FOR CONFINED SPACE ENTRY .............................. B-30
B.17.4 CONFINED SPACE OBSERVER. ......................................................... B-31
B.18.0 HEAT STRESS ........................................................................................................ B-33
B.19.0 COLD STRESS ......................................................................................................... B-35
3669 (18) CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE B.2.1 FORMER LANDFILL AND OPERATIONS AREA
FIGURE B.12.1 EMERGENCY HOSPITAL ROUTE
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE B.2.1 CONTAMINATION PROFILE -SUBSURFACE SOIL
TABLE B.2.2 CONTAMINATION PROFILE -ON-SITE
GROUNDWATER
TABLE B.7.1 HAZARD/RISK ANALYSIS FOR REMEDIAL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES -SPILLWAY,
CULVERT AND DRAINAGE LINE
TABLE B.7.2 HAZARD/RISK ANALYSIS FOR REMEDIAL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES O GROUNDWATER
EXTRACTION SYSTEM
TABLE B.7.3 HAZARD/RISK ANALYSIS FOR REMEDIAL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES -GROUNDWATER
TREATMENT SYSTEM
TABLE B.7.4 HAZARD/RISK ANALYSIS FOR REMEDIAL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES -SOIL VAPOR
EXTRACTION SYSTEM
TABLE B.7.5 HAZARD/RISK ANALYSIS FOR REMEDIAL
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES -SOIL FLUSHING
SYSTEM
TABLE B.12.1 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT B-1 TRAINING ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM
ATTACHMENT B-2 CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT
Following
Page
B-3
B-21
B-3
B-3
B-11
B-11
B-11
B-11
B-11
B-21
3669 08) CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.1.0 GENERAL
3669 (18)
The Construction Health and Safety Plan (HASP)
presented herein describes the health and safety procedures to be
implemented during the Remedial Action (RA) at the Jadco-Hughes Site
(Site) in Gaston County, North Carolina. Section 2.0 of the RA Work Plan
presents a description of current Site conditions. The five remedial
construction components to be implemented at the Site are as follows:
• construction of the spillway, culvert and drainage line;
• construction of the groundwater extraction system;
• construction of the groundwater treatment system;
• construction of the soil vapor extraction system; and
• construction of the soil flushing system.
During the remedial construction, personnel may come in
contact with soils, groundwater, sludge and/ or sediments which potentially
contain hazardous substances. To ensure _that direct contact with potentially
contaminated material by Site personnel is minimized, this HASP will be
adhered to by all on-Site personnel involved with the RA. This HASP has
been developed to ensure the following:
i) that Site· personnel are not adversely exposed to the compounds of
concern;
ii) that public welfare and the environment are not adversely impacted by
off-Site migration of contaminated rpaterials due to work activities at
the Site;
iii) compliance with applicable governmental and non-governmental
[American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH)]
regulations and guidelines. In particular, the amended rules of the
Occupational Safety and Health Act for Subpart Hof Part 1910 (Title 29
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 1910.120) will be implemented
for Site work; and
B-1 CONESTOCA·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
iv) initiation of proper emergency response procedures to minimize the
potential for any adverse impact to Site workers, the general public or
the environment.
For the purpose of this HASP, the components of the RA
activities performed on Site involving contact with potentially contaminated
materials will be considered contaminated operations requiring personal
protective equipment (PPE). A detailed description of the PPE required is
presented in Section B.8.0.
All RA activities at the Site will be conducted in
accordance with the provisions of this Site-specific HASP. Cost and/or
scheduling considerations will not be considered as justification for
modifying this plan. A copy of this HASP and applicable Material Safety Data
Sheets (MSDS) will be maintained on Site whenever Site activities associated
with the RA activities are in progress.
B-2 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I ,,
I
I , ,
I
I
I
I ,,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
1:
I
I
I
B.2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
3669 (18)
The Remedial Investigation (RI) identified the presence of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), base, neutral and acid extractable
compounds (BNAs) and metals in the groundwater and in the soil.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were detected in subsurface soils in the
former landfill and in very low concentrations in groundwater samples from
one monitoring well. Table B.2.1 identifies the contaminants in the
subsurface soil of the former landfill area and the former operations area and
their representative concentrations. The location of the former landfill area
and the former operations area on Site are shown on Figure B.2.1.
Table B.2.2 presents the contaminant profile of the on-Site
groundwater.
B-3 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
Page 1 of4 I
TABLE B.2.1 I CONTAMINATION PROFILE-SUBSURFACE SOILS
JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC I RA WORK PLAN
Part A -Fonner Land[ill
' Range of Detects Representative 95th Percentile
Compo11nd Low High Concentration (1) Mean (2)
voes Cmg(kg> I acetone 0.006 72 9.9 13
2-butanone 21 170 72 35 I 1, 1-dichloroethane 0.0027 0.0027 0.01 2.6
1,2-dichloroethane 1.6 9.3 5.7 3.4
ethylbenzene 8.4 65 36.4 19
methylene chloride 0.0019 11.0 3.1 2.9 I 4-methyl-2-pentanone 10.000 19.000 14.5 31
l, 1,2,2-tetrachl oroe thane 0.0095 0.0095 0.01 6.2
tetrachloroethene 0.0016 12 4.7 3.2 ,1 toluene 0.0018 620 303.6 182
1,1,1-trichloroethane 0.014 0.014 0.01 3.5
1, 1,2-trichloroethane 0.0028 0.0028 0.01 4.6 I trichloroethene 0.0075 3.5 1.8 1.8
total xylenes 0.0013 320 134.6 91
BNAs Cmg(kg) :I
acenaphthene 0.17 0.98 0.58 1.3
anthracene 1 1 1.0 1.4 I benzo(a)pyrene 3.6 3.6 3.6 1.6
benzo(b )fluoranthene 2.7 2.7 2.7 1.7
benzo{g,h,i)perylene 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 I benzo(k)fluoranthene 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.4
benzoic acid 13 35 19.4 11
bis(2-chloroethyl )ether 1.2 1.7 1.5 1.7
bis (2-ethy lhexy 1 )p h tha late 0.09 260 53.8 67 I butyl bentzyl phthalate 2 8.2 5.0 2.8
2-chlorophenol 14 90 42.4 24
chrysene 0.27 3.4 1.8 1.6 I 1,2-dichlorobenzene 1.4 2.1 1.7 1.2
1,4-dichlorobenzene 0.57 0.98 0.78 1.5
d i-n-bu tyl ph thala te 2.4 8.4 3. 3.6
di-n-octyl phthala te 4.6 6.1 5.4 2.5 I fluoranthene 0.48 5.4 2.9 1.8
fluorene 0.19 0.69 0.44 1.3
indeno{l,2,3-cd)pyrene 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.6 I 2-methylnaphthalene 0.11 2.9 1.1 1.3
2-methylphenol 2.5 9.1 5.1 3.0
4-methylphenol 1 2.5 1.9 1.1 :1 naphthalene 1.8 6.3 3.6 2.0
phenanthrene 3.4 3.4 3.4 1.8
phenol 8.2 24.0 16.0 8.6
pyrene 0.48 5.6 3.0 1.8 t 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 0.18 86.0 24.2 2.2
CRA 3669 (18) I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
' I
.,.:
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2 of 4
TABLE B.2.1
CONTAMINATION PROFILE· SUBSURFACE SOILS
JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
RA WORK PLAN
Range of Detects Representative 95th Percentile
Compound Low High Concentration (1) Mean (2)
Pesticides!PCBs Cmglkg/
PCB Aroclor 1248 11.0 36,0 20.3 NA
Metals and Total Cyanide lmglkg/
Aluminum 1,570 27,600 13,856 19,551
Antimony 16.1 47.5 30.9 18
Arsenic 30,9 47.0 39.0 58
Barium 27.6 268 102 117
Beryllium 0.75 1.7 1.2 1.9
Cadmium 1.0 4,0 2.5 2.4
Calcium 1,177 16,400 4,031 7,014
Chromium 5,8 190 66 87
Cobalt 10 30.6 20 78
Copper 35.4 1,010 219 353
Iron 17,000 63,690 36,354 45,308
Lead 5.1 596 301 623
Magnesium 1,426 8,900 4,087 7,457
Manganese 110 990 487 696
Mercury 0.06 0.18 0.11 0.08
Nickel 5.6 60 21 53
Potassium 130.4 885 358 378
Sodium 227.3 757 530 476
Thallium 0.08 0.11 0.09 0,27
Vanadium 37 290 122 155
Zinc 23.6 175 71 95.4
Total Cyanide 4.0 8,9 6,8 4.7
Notes:
• Based on RI soil data for the former landfill.
• VCX:s = volatile organic compounds.
• BNAs = base/neutral and acid extractable compounds.
• The above profile is based on samples collected from the following locations: BH(MW-3), BH-7,
BH-8, BH-9, BH-10, BH-11, TP-2 ,TP-3.
(1) Representative concentration is a conservative estimate of the concentration of each contaminant
in soil and was calculated by an arithmetic average of detections,
(2) 95th percentile mean includes all duplicates and sample depths.
NA Data not sufficient to calculate 95th percentile mean.
CRA 3669 (18)
TABLE B.2.1
CONTAMINATION PROFILE-SUBSURFACE SOILS
JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
RA WORK PLAN
Part B -Fonner 012erations Area
Range of Detects
Compound Low High
voes Cmglkg!
acetone 0.0031 1.8
2-butanone 0.10 0.68
1,2-dichloroethane 0.0075 30
1,2-dichloroethene (total) 0.003 0.16
methylene chloride 0.0024 0.44
4-methyl-2-pentanone 0.018 0.18
toluene 0.0014 0.2
trichloroethene 0.0071 . 19
vinyl chloride 0.0055 0.0055
BNAs Cmglkg/
bis(2-chloroethyl )ether 0.23 0.23
bis(2-ethylhexy 1 )ph tha late 0.11 0.21
di-n-b utylph thala te 0.12 0.29
phenol 0.12 0.12
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 0.15 0.15
PCBs !mg/kg!
PCB Aroclor-1248 1.2 1.2
Notes:
• voes = volatile organic compounds
• BNAs
• PCBs
= base/neutral and acid extractable compounds
= polychlorinated biphenyls
Re pre sen ta tive
Concentration (1)
0.39
0.39
6.06
0.08
0.11
0.06
0.06
4.76
0.01
0.23
0.15
0.19
0.12
0.15
1.2
The above profile is based on samples collected from the following locations:
BH (MW-6), BH-17, BH-18, BH-19, BH-20, BH-21, TP-7.
Page3 of 4
95th Percentile
Mean (2)
0.41
0.53
6.8
0.04
0.10
0.90
0.05
4.0
0.10
0.35
0.68
0.32
0.27
0.27
NA
(1) Representative concentration is a conservative estimate of the concentration of each contaminant
in soil and was calculated by an arithmetic average of detections. These results are rounded to
2 decimal places.
(2) 95th percentile mean includes all duplicates and sample depths.
NA Data not sufficient to calculate 95th percentile mean.
CRA 3669 (18)
I
I
I ,,
' I
I .,
I
I
I
I
11 I ' • I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
' I ,.
I
·1
I
I .,
' I
I
I
I
I
··,
I
I
Compound
Metals lmglkg>
Aluminum
Arsenic, graphite AA
Barium
Berillium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead, graphite AA
Magnesium
Manganese
Nickel
Potassium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Notes:
TABLE B.2.1
CONTAMINATION PROFILE-SUBSURFACE SOILS
JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
RA WORK PLAN
Range of Detects
Low High
8,800 2I,OO0
13 30
32.3 140
0.4 0.4
0.9 2.1
2,400 6,700
2.6 139
7 22
34 95
15,000 38,000
0.81 15
1,500 6,970 ,
210 1,100
6 45.7
440 860
0.8 0.8
642 642
0.08 0.08
37 89
37 39
Representative
Concentration (1)
14,560
23
82
0.4
1.9
4,228
34
15
63
25,400
4.6
4,394
521
16
590
0.8
642
0.08
68
38
Page 4 of 4
95th Percentile
Mean (2)
22,461
33
138
0.47
2.8
7,050
13
24
117
40,677
16
4,894
1,256
12
1,002
0.67
466
0.08
115
41
The above profile for Metals is based on samples collected from the following locations: BH(MW-6),
BH-21, TP-7.
(1) Representative concentration is a conservative estimate of the concentration of each contaminant
in soil and was calculated by an arithmetic average of detections.
(2) 95th percentile mean includes all duplicates and sample depths.
NA Data not sufficient to calculate 95th percentile mean.
CRA 3669 (18)
-..
CAA
-.. -(--
------PROPERTY LINE
-•---;-FENCC UN(
~ fORM[R L.A.NOflll AREA
FORMER OP[RA TlONS AREA
I I ',
/ l[XllLE SAl.[S ANO
0 !)() \0011
e-L.J I
\ / / H[l'AIR PHOPEffff ~
J \ ,<--~----,~--~~~~-/ / --~--,--' . " ""' , "" _., . ,. ····•·\: ....... , I I\
I .'
:;c;,..Hl<l.'S
J•l/01'1.Kl (
I I I
· ~,.. • ✓ ~~~c•o""''' "'' ....... _ .. _. __ ._Li_·_:~; \-"' :_ .••. _:: .. ~.;. ;-•-. C (~~;,::~-·• \ i ~. \~
11 ' r -1ibv,• '•\
.-I l '. : 1\ ~ •• -~.. ,. '~ •-.~.
I/! a, ,. '
/-'dl~.·~ "-= ~-==----=~·:-· •·:· ~=-'J:.:_"·'_':_:;.;-~ PLWIIK l'ROl'[U IY
I
I
·-.,.,-rr,•r' "'()'(,
FORMER LANDFILL
figure B.2.1
AND OPERATIONS AREAS
JADCO-HUGHES SITE
Gaston County, NC
J669 (18) JAN 28/94(W) REV.O (P-60)
..
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I
I
TABLE B.2.2
CONTAMINATION PROFILE-ON-SITE GROUNDWATER
JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
Compound
voes CugtL>
acetone
benzene
2-butanone
carbon disulfide
carbon tetrachloride
chlorobenzene
chloroethane
chloroform
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
1,1-dichloroethene
1,2-dichloroethene (total)
1,2-d ichloropropane
ethylbenzene
2-hexanone
methylene chloride
4-methy 1-2-pen ta none
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
tetrachloroethane
toluene
1,1,1-trichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
trichloroethene
vinyl chloride
total xylenes
BNAs !ug!L)
benzoic acid
bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
di-n-bu typhthalate
di-n-octylphthalate
2-methylphenol
4-methylphenol
naphthalene
phenol
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
CR.A 3660 (18)
RD WORK PLAN
RI DATA
Representative
Concentration
30524
277
57124
1.8
7153
96
7.7
17083
22
986
141
2561
0.32
749
900
1750
6688
0.26
6.2
17359
168
1.6
69
11451
1376
2675
4623
11
41
56
19
121
196
1.9
26
74
8.1
1109
606
95th Percent
Mean
8166
312
4700
131
1541
409
369
7061
210
483
337
1071
419
496
2445
679
3115
485
297
5940
271
352
145
3687
458
639
3089
161
37
41
33
113
85
39
175
177
25
255
326
PRE-RD DATA (1)
Representative
Concentration
27133
263.22
ND
ND
7703
253
ND
18608
ND
770
ND
2934
ND
536
ND
1631
ND
ND
5.8
15474
ND
ND
59
11097
1278
ND
ND
4286
ND
54
35
156
ND
ND
25
63
10
ND
541
Page 1 of 2
Compound
PCBs Cug!L) (2)
Arochlor 1248
Arochlor 1232
Metals Cmg!L >
aluminum
antimony
arsenic
barium
beryllium
cadmium
calcium
chromium
cobalt
copper
iron
lead
magnesium
manganese
nickel
potassium
silver
sodium
thallium
vanadium
zinc
Notes:
TABLEB.2.2
CONTAMINATION PROFILE-ON-SITE GROUNDWATER
JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
RD WORK PLAN
RI DATA
Representative
Concentration
ND
ND
35
0.22
0.04
0.2
0.001
0.0067
136
0.14
0.068
0.17
55
0.0095
63
8.9
0.15
7.7
O.Dl
18
0.001
0.14
0.18
95th Pere en t
Mean
NA
NA
38
0.12
0.02
0.2
0.01
0.03
131
0.15
0.05
0.14
57
0.1
58
10
0.15
3.6
0.1
18
0.18
0.13
0.95
PRE-RD DATA (1)
Rep re sen tative
Concentration
1.3
1.9
27
ND
ND
0.2
ND
ND
110
0.15
0.06
0.15
40
ND
50
6.8
0.13
6.4
ND
16
ND
0.12
0.16
Page 2 of 2
(1) Pre-RD data representative concentration is calculated based on all detections during the RI and pre-RD.
If compound was not detected during pre-RD then representative concentration was non-detect.
(2) Each PCB isomer only detected once in MW8S during pre-RD. These compounds were never detected in
any other samples.
CRA 3660 (18)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
' I {•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.3.0 BASIS
3669 (18)
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) Standards and Regulations contained in Title 29, CFR, Parts 1910 and
1926 (29 CFR 1910 and 1926), including the amended sections in 29 CFR
1910.120 and current Threshold Limit Values (TL Vs) as provided by the
ACGIH, provide the basis for this HASP. Some of the specifications within
this section are in addition to OSHA regulations and reflect the positions of
USEP A, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
and the United States Coast Guard (USCG) regarding procedures required to
ensure safe operations at potential hazardous waste sites. In addition, the
following references have been used as guidance in developing the HASP:
i) CERCLA Sections 104(£) and lll(c) (6);
ii) EPA Order 1440.2 -Health and Safety Requirements for Employees
Engaged in Field Activities;
iii) EPA Order 1440.1 -Respiratory Protection;
iv) EPA Occupational Health & Safety Manual
v) EPA Interim Standard Operating Safety Guide (September 1982);
vi) OSHA Standards for General Industry;
vii) NIOSH, Manual of Analytical Methods, Volumes I-VII;
viii) Threshold Limit Values (TLV) for Chemical Substances and Physical
Agents in the Work Environment with Intended Changes Adopted by
ACGIH;
ix)
x)
xi)
ANSI Z 88.2-1980, American Natiol).al Standard, Practices for
Respiratory Protection;
Air Sampling Instruments for Evaluation of Atmospheric
Contaminants, 6th edition, 1983, American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists; and
Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual, U.S. EPA (October 1986).
The safety and health of the public and on-Site personnel
and the protection of the environment will take precedence over cost and
schedule considerations for all remedial construction work. The RA
Contractor will designate an on-Site individual as Health and Safety Officer
(HSO) during on-Site remedial constructio_n activities. Contractors working
B-4 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
on the Site will be responsible for the health and safety of their workers. This
will include ensuring that all workers are thoroughly trained with the
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) of any equipment (for example,
excavators) they will be operating, or hazardous procedures (for example,
confined space entry) they will participate in. The HSO will be responsible for
decisions regarding when work will be stopped or started for health or safety
considerations. The RA Contractor will develop a Site-specific HASP related
to its specific activities at the Site. Each Site-specific HASP will be reviewed by
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (CRA) for completeness and compliance with
the minimum standards set forth in this HASP, prior to commencing work
activities involving contact with potentially contaminated materials at the
Site.
B-5 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
B.4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES AND ADMINISTRATION
3669 (18)
The HSO will supervise the implementation of the HASP
and will be responsible for all decisions regarding operations and work
stoppages due to health and safety considerations.
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
The responsibilities of the HSO will be as follows:
be responsible for implementation of the HASP at the initiation of Site
work;
conduct the initial briefing sessions for all on-Site personnel with
regard to the HASP and other safety requirements to be observed
during remedial construction, including:
potential hazards, including heat/ cold stress,
personal hygiene principles,
PPE,
respiratory protection equipment usage, and
a)
b)
c)
d)
e) emergency procedures dealing with fire and medical situations;
review and modify the HASP as more information becomes available
concerning the hazardous materials involved, and review all
monitoring reports;
supervision and enforcement of safety equipment usage;
supervision and inspection of equipment cleaning;
personnel training in safety equipment usage and emergency
procedures;
monitoring of the health and safety program under the direction of an
industrial hygienist;
B-6 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
viii) suspend work activity if unsafe working conditions develop, including
unsafe working conditions generated by adverse wind, rain and
lightning;
ix)
x)
xi)
xii)
inform workers of the nature of chemical exposure risk as required by
the "Right-to-Know" Law;
recommend medical examination when worker appears to require it;
coordination of emergency procedures; and
maintain a sign in/ out log for personnel and visitors.
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B-7 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.5.0 MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE
3669 (18)
In accordance with requirements detailed in 29 CFR
1910.120 and 29 CFR 1910.134, all Site personnel who will come in contact
with potentially contaminated materials will have received, within one year
prior to starting field activities, medical surveillance by a licensed physician
or physician's group.
Medical records for all Site personnel who will come in
contact with potentially contaminated materials will be maintained by their
respective employers. The medical records will detail the tests that were
taken and will include a copy of the consulting physician's statement
regarding the tests and the employee's suHability for work. These medical
records must be available to the employee or his designated representative
upon written request, as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120, Section (f).
Each employer will en.sure and certify to the HSO that its
personnel involved in activities associated with potentially contaminated
materials will have had all necessary medical examinations prior to
commencing work within contaminated areas. Personnel not obtaining
medical certification and who do not have their records up-to-date will not
perform work within contaminated areas.
Interim medical surveillance will be completed if an
individual exhibits poor health or high stress responses due to on-Site
activity or when accidental exposure to elevated concentrations of
contaminants occurs.
B-8 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
B.6.0 TRAINING
3669 (18)
The HSO will require that all Site personnel who will
come in contact with potentially contaminated materials complete training
sessions in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120 prior to entering the Site. This
training shall consist of a minimum of 40 hours of instruction off Site and
three days of actual field experience under direct supervision. Each employer
will maintain documentation stating that its on-Site personnel have
complied with this regulation.
Prior to commencing Site activities, all personnel will be
required to attend a Site-specific initiation session. These sessions, conducted
by the HSO, will be used to instruct the Site personnel as to what the Site
activities and potential Site hazards are, level of PPE required, Site-specific
requirements, work zones established at the Site, personal and equipment
decontamination procedures; emergency response plan and procedures, and
the basis of the HASP . At this session it will be confirmed by CRA that all
on-Site personnel have the 40 hours of training required in accordance with
29 CFR 1910.120. All personnel who attend this session will sign a Training
Acknowledgment Form, an example of which is presented as
Attachment B-1.
During the course of Site activities, additional safety
meetings will be conducted by the HSO with on-Site personnel to provide
updates on Site conditions and health and safety concerns.
B-9 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
I
D
D
I
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.7.0 SITE WORK ZONES AND WORK ACTIVITIES
3669 (18)
Site work zones will be clearly laid out and identified in .
the field prior to initiation of Site work activities. The establishment of all
the Sites work zone boundaries may be modified by the HSO and/or
Supervising Contractor (CRA). The purpose of establishing these work zones
is to limit access to potentially contaminated areas or areas which may cause
physical injury to individuals and to prevent the migration of potentially
contaminated materials into adjacent non-contaminated areas. These
designated work zones are described as follows:
i) Exclusion Zone (EZ) -this zone will include areas where potentially
contaminated soils, sediments, waters or waste material are located,
excavated, removed, transferred, stored, or disposed of and all areas
where contaminated equipment or personnel travel including the
decontamination area. Sufficient area will be provided for efficient and
safe movement of personnel and equipment as well as contaminant
control. The EZ will be delinJ,ated in the field with fencing, flagging or
warning barriers. Access to the EZ will be restricted to personnel who
are wearing the proper PPE, have received and passed the required
medical examination and have undergone the required health and
safety training. A log of entry to and exit from the EZ will be
maintained for the purpose of stress monitoring and determining
exposure times;
ii)
iii)
Contamination Reduction Zone (CRZ) -this zone lies immediately
adjacent to the EZ and occurs at the interface of the EZ and Support
Zone (SZ) and will provide for the transfer of construction materials,
personnel and equipment, a place for donning and disposing of PPE,
the storing of emergency first aid equipment and supplemental safety
supplies. Access to the CRZ will be restricted to personnel who have
received and passed the required medical examination and have
undergone the required health and safety training; and
Support Zone (SZ) -this area is comprised of the remainder of the
designated work area at the Site and is defined as being an area outside
B-10 CONESTOGA·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
the zone of significant air, soil or surface water contamination. The SZ
will be clearly delineated and procedures will be implemented to
prevent active or passive contamination from the other work zones.
The function of the SZ includes:
a)
b)
c)
d)
an entry area for personnel, material and equipment to the CRZ,
an exit for decontaminated personnel, materials and equipment
from the CRZ,
a storage area for clean safety and work equipment; and
an area for ea ting, drinking and smoking.
The work activities to be conducted for each component of
the RA at the Site are detailed in Sections 6.0 to 10.0 of the RA Work Plan for
the Site.
Tables B.7.1 through B.7.5 present CRA's assessment of
the hazard/risk analysis for the Site work activities for each component of the
remedial construction and identify the level of personal protective
equipment (PPE) required for each RA activity.
B-11 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE B.7.1
HAZARD/RISK ANALYSIS FOR REMEDIAL ACTION ACTIVITIES
SPILLWAY, CUL VERT AND DRAINAGE LINE CONSTRUCTION
JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
Work Activity
Site Preparation Activities
(i.e. Install Offices)
Installation of the Construction,
Equipment and Personnel
Decontamination Facilities
Construction of the Spillway,
Culvert Replacement and
Drainage Line
Note:
RA WORK PLAN
Anticipated Hazards/Risks
• slip/trip/fall hazards
• potential back injuries from
lifting and moving
• slip/trip/fall hazards
• potential contact with
contaminated soil, sediment and
water
• potential dust and/or vapor
emissions
• physical hazards presented by the
use of heavy equipment
• potential back injuries from
lifting and moving
• slip/trip/fall hazards :
• direct contact with contaminated
soil, sediment and water
• potential dust and/or vapor
emissions
• physical hazards presented by the
use of heavy equipment
• confined space entries (1)
Level of PPE Required
• Level D (2)
• Level D
• Level C for ground invasive
activities
• Level D for surface grading work
• Level C for subsurface work
• Level C for decontamination
activities
• Level C or Level B if air
monitoring results indicate the
need
I (1) Specific requirement for confined space entry are specified in Section B.17.
(4) Levels of PPE discussed in Section B.8.0.
I
I CRA 3669 (18)
TABLE B.7.2
HAZARD/RISK ANALYSIS FOR REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION SYSTEM
. JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
RA WORK PLAN
Work Activity
Backfilling with Clean Material
Installation of Extraction Wells,
Extraction Trenches, Manholes,
Decontamination Activites and
Sampling Activities
Note:
Anticipated Hazards/Risks
• slip/trip/fall hazards
• potential back injuries from
lifting and moving
• hazards presented by the use
of heavy equipment
• potential dust emissions
• slip/trip/fall hazards
• direct contact with contaminated
soil, sediment and water
• potential dust and/or vapor
emissions
• potential contact with unknown
hazardous substances
• hazards presented by the use of
heavy equipment
• confined space entries (1)
• hazards presented by the use of
specialized decontamination
equipment (i.e. steam cleaning
unit)
• potential contact with
decontamination fluids
Level of PPE Required
• Level D, or Level C if air
monitoring results indicate the
need
• Modified Level C (2) for extraction
well installation activities
• Modified Level C for remaining
acti vites or Level C or Level B if
air monitoring results indicate
the need
(1) Specific requirements for confined space entry arc specified in Section B.17.0.
(2) Modified Level C -Level C PPE, without respirator.
CRA 3669 (l8)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8
H
u
D
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE B.7.3
HAZARD/RISK ANALYSIS FOR REMOVAL ACTION ACTIVITIES
GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
Work Activity
Site Preparation Activities
(i.e. Install Offices)
Installation of the Construction,
Equipment and Personnel
Decontamination Facilities
Construction of the Treatment
Facility
Note:
RA WORK PLAN
Anticipated Hazards/Risks
• slip/trip/fall hazards
• potential back injuries from
lifting and moving
• slip/trip/fall hazards
• potential contact with
contaminated soil, sediment and
water
• potential dust and/or vapor
emissions
• physical hazards presented by the
use of heavy equipment
• potential back injurics•from
lifting and moving
• slip/trip/fall hazards
• direct contact with contaminated ' soil, sediment and water
• potential dust and/or vapor
emissions
• hazards presented by the use of
heavy equipment
• confined space entries (1)
(1) Specific requirement for confined space entry arc specified in Section B.17.
(2) Modified Level C-Level C PPE, without respirator.
CRA3669(l8)
Lroe/ of PPE Required
• Level D
• Level D
• Level C for ground invasive
activities
• Level D for surface grading work
• Modified Level C (2) or Level C
for subsurface work
• Modified Level C or Level C for
decontamination activities
• Modified Level C or Level C or
Level B if air monitoring results
indicate the need
TABLE B.7.4
HAZARD/RISK ANALYSIS FOR REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVffiES
SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM
JADCO-HUGHES SITE. GASTON COUNTY, NC
Work Activity
Regrading of the Former Landfill
Area and Installation of a Soil
Cover
Installation of SVE Trenches and
SVE Treatment System
Decontamination Activites and
Sampling Activities
Note:
RA WORK PLAN
Anticipated Hazards/Risks
• slip/trip/fall hazards
• physical hazards presented by
the use of heavy equipment
• potential dust and/or fugitive
emissions
• direct contact with contaminated
soils
• potential contact with unknown
waste materials
• decontamination activities
• potential contact with
decontamination fluids
• slip/trip/fall hazards
• potential dust and/or vapor
fugitive emissions
• physical hazards presented by the
use of heavy equipment
• direct contact with contaminated
soils
• potential contact with unknown
waste materials
• decontamination activities
• potential contact with
decontamination fluids
Level of PPE Required
• Level D, upgrade to Level C or B
if air monitoring results indicate
the need
• Level D, upgrade to Level C or B
depending on air monitoring
results. To be specified in
Contractor's Site-specific HASP
(1) Specific requirements for confined space entry are specified in Section B.17.0.
CRAJ{,69(18)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLEB.7.5
HAZARD/RISK ANALYSIS FOR REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
SOIL FLUSHING SYSTEM
Work Activity
Site Preparation Activities
(i.e. Install Offices)
Installation of Soil Flushing
Extraction Trenches
Note:
JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
RA WORK PLAN
Anticipated Hazards/Risks
• slip/trip/fall hazards·
• potential back injuries from
lifting and moving
• slip/trip/fall hazards
• direct contact with contaminated
soil, sediment and water
• potential dust and/or vapor
emissions
• potential contact with
decontamination fluids
• physical hazards presented by the
use of heavy equipment
• hazards presented by the use of
specialized decontamination
equipment (i.e. steam cleaning
unit)
Level of PPE Required
• Level D
• Modified Level C (2), Level C or
Level B if air monitoring
results indicate the need
(1) Specific requirements for confined space entry are specified in Section B.17.0.
(2) Modified Level C -Level C PPE, without respirator.
CRA 3669 (18)
B.8.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)
3669 {18)
The HSO will require that all personnel are equipped with
PPE appropriate for the work area and the nature of work being completed.
The HSO will require that all safety equipment and protective clothing are
kept clean, well-maintained and that their integrity is intact.
Safety equipment and apparel as required for general work
on Site will be Level D and/or Level C, or Level B protective equipment if air
monitoring results indicate the need as discussed in Section 9.0. The levels of
personal protection required for each phase of the remedial construction
activities are presented in Tables B.7.1 to B.7.5.
Level B
Level B PPE which will be used on-Site consists of the
following:
i) · supplied-air respirator (MSHA/NIOSH approved). Respirators may be
positive pressure-demand, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA)
or positive pressure-demand, airline respirator (with escape bottle for
Immediate Danger to Life and Health (IDLH) or potential for IDLH
atmosphere);
ii) chemical-resistant clothing (overalls and long-sleeved jacket; hooded
one or two-piece chemical-splash suit; disposable chemical-resistant;
one-piece suits);
iii) long cotton underwear or long-sleeved shirt and pants;
iv) gloves (outer), chemical-resistant;
v) gloves (inner), chemical-resistant;
vi) boots (outer), chemical-resistant, steel toe and shank;
B-12 CONESTOGA ·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3669 08)
vii) boot covers (outer), chemical-resistant (disposable); and
viii) hard hat (face shield).
LevelC
Level C PPE which will be used on Site consists of the
following:
i)
ii)
iii)
air-purifying respirator, full-face (MSHA/NIOSH approved), equipped
with organic vapor (OV / AG) cartridge with a high efficiency particulate
air (HEPA) filter;
chemical-resistant clothing (coveralls; hooded one-piece or two-piece
chemical splash suit; chemical-resistant hood and apron; disposable
chemical-resistant coveralls);
long cotton underwear or long-sleeved shirt and pants;
iv) gloves (outer), chemical-resistant;
v) gloves (inner), chemical-resistant;
vi) boots (outer), chemical-resistant, steel toe and shank;
vii) boot covers (outer), chemical-resistant (disposable); and
viii) hard hat (face shield).
Level D
following:
i)
ii)
coveralls;
gloves;
Level D PPE which will be used on Site consists of the
B-13 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
iii)
iv)
v)
boots/ shoes (leather or chemical-resistant) with steel toe and shank;
safety glasses; and
hard hat.
Additional protective equipment usage guidelines to be
implemented include:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
vii)
prescription eyeglasses in use on the Site will be safety glasses;
contact lenses will not be permitted in the EZ;
all disposable or reusable nitrile, latex and/ or cotton gloves worn on
the Site will be changed, decontaminated or discarded at the end of
each day;
during periods of respirator usage, respirator cartridges and filters will
be changed daily, or upon breakthrough, whichever occurs first;
on-Site personnel who have not passed a respirator fit test will not be
permitted to enter or work in the EZ. Personnel will not be permitted
to have beards, or long sideburns or mustaches that interfere with a
proper fit of the respirator;
all PPE worn on Site will be decontaminated or discarded at the end of
each work day;
duct tape will be used to ensure that disposable coveralls and gloves are
· · tightly secured when personnel are working within the EZ; and
no watches, rings or other accessories will be permitted during drilling
and sampling activities.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,_ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B-14 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.9.0 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM
3669 (18)
Prior to arriving at the Site, all on-Site personnel will
have received training in the use of, and have been fit tested for full-facepiece
respirators. All on-Site personnel will be required to comply with their
employer's specific written respiratory protection program developed in
accordance with OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134.
Respiratory protectio1;1 will be required during all
subsurface ground activities, subject to the results of air monitoring. This is
to ensure worker protection from potentially contaminated particulates.
During work at the Site a Photoionization Detector (PIO)
will be used to determine if organic vapors are present. A background
reading will be established prior to commencing work activities at each active
work area.
Action levels to determine the level of respiratory
protection necessary during nonground invasive activities are based on the
concentration of unknown organic vapors measured within the breathing
zone. The action levels and appropriate respiratory protection for these Site
activities are as follows:
Sustained Organic Vapor Reading
Above Background within
Breathing Zone
0 -5 ppm or background
5-50 ppm
>50 ppm
>500 ppm
B-15
Action Taken
full-facepiece air purifying
respirator available
wear full-face air purifying
respirator
wear supplied air respirator
shut down activities,
implement additional
engineering controls
CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
However, if the ambient concentrations of organic vapors are due to
identifiable substances, the level of respiratory protection may be altered by
the HSO.
Periodic air monitoring data may be obtained which will
form the basis of making modifications to the levels of respiratory protection
presented above.
B-16 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.10.0
3669 (18)
PERSONAL HYGIENE
The HSO will require that all personnel performing or
supervising work within the EZ observe and adhere to the personal
hygiene-related provisions of this section.
On-Site personnel found to be disregarding the personal
hygiene-related provisions of this HASP will, at the discretion of the HSO, be
barred from the Site.
Each employer will ensure that the following
equipment/ facilities are available for the personal hygiene of its on-Site
personnel:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
suitable disposable outerwear, gloves, respiratory protection and
footwear on a daily basis for the use of its on-Site personnel;
disposal containers for used disposable outerwear;
emergency eye wash and emergency shower facilities; and
potable water and a suitable sanitation facility.
The RA Contractor will be responsible for the disposal of
used PPE, sanitary wastes, and sanitary solid wastes.
The HSO also will enforce the following regulations for
personnel actively participating in the remedial construction activities:
i) on-Site personnel will wear appropriate PPE when in the EZ;
ii) used disposable outerwear will not be reused and when removed, will
be placed inside disposal containers provided for that purpose;
B-17 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
iii)
iv)
3669 (18)
smoking, eating and drinking will be prohibited within the EZ and the
CRZ. These activities will be permitted only within a designated area
of the SZ; and
on-Site personnel will thoroughly cleanse their hands, face, neck area
and other exposed areas before smoking, eating, drinking or using
toilets and before leaving the Site.
B-18 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.11.0
3669 (18)
AIR MONITORING
During the progress of remedial construction activities,
periodic monitoring of total particulate levels and organic vapors will be
taken by the HSO or his designee.
The following air monitoring instrumentation will be
used for this purpose:
i) a PIO; and
ii) a real time digital particulate monitor.
All monitoring equipment will be calibrated on a daily
basis in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines, and such calibrations
will be recorded in the Site daily log book. Results of daily air monitoring
also will be recorded in the Site daily log book.
Air monitoring will be conducted in the breathing zone of
workers in the EZ and at the downwind perimeter of the Site on an hourly
basis or as deemed necessary by the HSO based on Site-specific conditions.
Background measurements immediately:upwind of the EZ will be taken
before activities commence. Work activities generating sustained particulate
levels in excess of 150 µg/m3 or sustained organic vapor levels greater than
10 ppm above background at the downwind Site perimeter, will temporarily
be halted until alternate work methods or engineering controls are in place to
maintain particulate levels below 150 µg/m3 and organic vapor levels below
10 ppm above background at the downwind Site perimeter. These action
levels may be modified based upon chemical-specific data.
Respiratory action levels for organic vapors are discussed
in Section 9.0.
Immediately upon identifying sustained elevated levels of
organic vapors (greater than 500 parts per million) within the work zone, the
air monitoring results will be reported to the HSO, and work activities will be
shut down. The HSO or his designee will determine the cause of the
B-19 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOC!A TES
3669 (18)
sustained elevated levels of organic vapors, and alternate work methods or
engineering controls will be implemented to rectify the release of elevated
concentrations of organic vapors, or the level of PPE will be upgraded as
required.
B-20 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.12.0
3669 (18)
COMMUNICATIONS
Emergency numbers including police, fire, ambulance and
hospital are presented in Table B.12.1 and will be prominently posted near the
Site telephone(s).
A route map to the nearest emergency medical facility is
presented on Figure B.12.1 and will be posted in each vehicle. Prior to
initiating Site activities, the emergency medical facility will be notified of Site
activities to ensure preparedness to respond to any Site-related injuries. The
nearest emergency medical facility is the Gaston Memorial Hospital.
Directions to the hospital are provided in Section B.14.0.
B-21 CONESTOGA-ROVER5 & ASSOCIATES
TABLE B.12.1
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS
JADCO-HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
RA WORK PLAN
Gaston Memorial Hospital
Gaston County Emergency Management
Belmont Fire Department
Ambulance
Police
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
(after 6 p.m.) Stephen Quigley
or Jeanne Chew
USEP A Region IV
Michael Townsend
Duke Power (24-hour)
CRA 3669 (18)
[phone]
[phone]
911
911
911
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
I
I
I
m
0
D
E
E
I
I
I
I
I
m
D
D
I
•
I
---------------
a I &
RANLO • • I
I EGEND
EMERGENCY HOSPITAL ROUTE
CAA
3669 (18) JAN 10/94 (W) REV.O
~, ~ .... ~ ..
, " ,,,_. ,,. 0 3600ft
figure 8.12.1
EMERGENCY HOSPITAL ROUTE
JADCO-HUGHES SITE
Gaston County, NC
·g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.13.0
3669 (18)
EMERGENCY AND FIRST AID EQUIPMENT
Emergency safety equipment will be available for use by
Site personnel and will be located and maintained on Site. The safety
equipment will include, but is not limited to, the following:
i) portable emergency eye wash and shower;
ii) two 20-pound ABC type dry chemical fire extinguishers;
iii) appropriate first-aid kit for a minimum of 10 persons;
iv) fire blanket;
v) two SCBA units;
vi) portable air horn; and
vii) a flashlight.
CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
B.14.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN
3(,69 (18)
B.14.1 OFF-SITE CONTINGENCY PLAN
Prior to commencing work involving the excavation
and/or handling of potentially contaminated material, the HSO will
coordinate the development of an off-Site emergency contingency plan. This
plan is intended to provide immediate response to a serious Site occurrence
such as explosion, fire or migration of significant quantities of toxic or
hazardous material from the Site into adjacent public areas.
A coordination meeting will be held with appropriate
local authorities to identify the remedial action activities to be performed on
Site and to discuss the protocols to be taken in the event of an incident. The
contingency plan will be developed to incorporate the following:
1) notification of incident;
2) evacuation of adjacent areas;
3) transport of injured personnel to medical facilities; and
4) priority transportation routes.
B.14.2 ON-SITE CONTINGENCY PLAN
In the event of injury to on-Site personnel or contact with
hazardous materials, the following protocols will be followed:
1) in the event of injury, notify the HSO, and the Resident Engineer;
2)
3)
contact hospital and describe the injury ( Gaston Memorial Hospital, as
shown on Figure B.12.1);
decontaminate personnel and administer appropriate emergency first
aid; and
B-23 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASS<XIA TES
g
0
D
D
0
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
g
• •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
4) transport personnel to the hospital along the following predefined
route. The predefined route is as follows: turn left on Cason Street
upon exiting the Site; follow Cason Street to the end, turn left on
Woodlawn Street; follow Woodlawn to the end (set of traffic lights),
turn right on Old Route 273; follow signs to Interstate Highway 85 west
(on right side); follow Highway 85 for approximately four miles, exit
New Hope Road; turn right on New Hope Road; turn right on Court
Road; follow Court Road for approximately one mile; Gaston
Memorial Hospital is on the right side.
Fire extinguishers will be maintained in strategic locations
within the Site to combat small localized fires.
In the event of significant release of potentially toxic or
hazardous vapors from any container or excavation, equipment operators
will immediately don self contained breathing apparatus and the source of
such vapors will be backfilled or covered with fill. Alternate plans of
contaminant removal will be developed and submitted to the HSO prior to
recommencing work in the area.
The Resident Engineer will assume the responsibility of
notifying USEP A of such an incident.
Emergency telephone numbers for the Site are listed in
Table B.12.1.
Figure B.12.1 and Table B.12.1 will be posted in a
prominent place in the CZ.
B-24 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
B.15.0 EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL DECONTAMINATION
3669 (18)
During the initiation of the RA activities, procedures will
be implemented to reduce the amount of contact of both personnel and
equipment with the waste constituents. These procedures include the
following:
i) proper work practices that would lead to minimal direct contact with
potentially contaminated material (e.g. avoid contact in areas of
obvious contamination, remote sampling and handling procedures,
etc.);
ii) use of disposable equipment and clothing as much as practicable; and
iii) encase source of contaminants (e.g. with plastic sheeting or foam).
All vehicles and equipment leaving the EZ which came in
contact with potentially contaminated material will be decontaminated on the
vehicle/equipment decontamination pad, and as a minimum will include
high pressure water wash of the affected areas of the vehicle/equipment.
Personnel decontamination will take place at the exit
from the EZ and will, as a minimum, consist of a glove and boot wash with
detergent and removal of gloves, boots, disposable suit and hard hat.
All personnel will remove their protective clothing and
wash their hands, face, neck area and other exposed areas before entering the
on-Site lunch and break areas to eat, drink, smoke or use the toilet facilities,
and before leaving the Site.
B-25 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOC!A TES
I
g
D
D
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B.16.0 CONTAMINATION MIGRATION CONTROL
3669 (18)
All vehicles and equipment used within the EZ will be
decontaminated on Site at the vehicle/equipment decontamination pad prior
to leaving the Site. Decontamination, when required, will consist of the
thorough cleaning, using a high pressure cleaner, of those parts of the
equipment which come in contact with potentially contaminated material.
The HSO will certify that each piece of.equipment is clean or has been
decontaminated prior to removal from Site.
Personnel engaged in vehicle decontamination will wear
Level C personal protective equipment including respiratory protection and
face shields.
All decontamination wash waters, decontamination
solvents, purge water, well development water and water generated from
dewatering excavations will be collected and treated in the on-Site
groundwater treatment system.
B-26 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
B.17.0
3669 ~8)
CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PROCEDURE
A confined space provides the potential for unusually
high concentrations of contaminants, explosive atmospheres, oxygen
deficient atmospheres, limited visibility and restricted movement. This
Section establishes requirements for safe entry into, continued work in, and
safe exit from confined spaces. Additional information regarding confined
space entry can be found in 29 CFR 1926.21, 29 CFR 1910 and NIOSH 80-106.
At this Site, confined spaces may be encountered during excavation activities
or if any tank or vessel needs to be entered for cleaning purposes.
B.17.1 DEFINITIONS
Confined Space: A space or work area not designed or
intended for normal human occupancy, having limited means of egress and
poor natural ventilation; and/ or any structure, including buildings or rooms,
which have limited means of egress.
Confined Space Entry Permit (CSEP): A document to be
initiated by the supervisor of personnel who are to enter into or work in a
confined space. The CSEP will be completed by the personnel involved in the
entry and approved by the HSO before personnel will be permitted to enter
the confined space. The CSEP shall be valid only for the performance of the
work identified on the permit and for the location and time specified on the
permit. The beginning of a new shift with change of personnel will require
the issuance of a new CSEP. A copy of a CSEP is provided in Attachment B-2.
Confined Space Observer: An individual assigned to
monitor the activities of personnel working within a confined space. The
confined space observer monitors and provides external assistance to those
inside the confined space. The confined space observer summons rescue
personnel in the event of emergency and assists the rescue team.
B-27 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
D
0
0
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
H
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3669 {18)
B.17.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS
The following general provisions will apply to confined
space entry:
i) confined spaces should be identified with a posted sign which
reads: Caution -Confined Space;
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
only personnel trained and knowledgeable of the requirements of these
confined space entry procedures will be authorized to enter a confined
space or be a confined space observer;
a CSEP must be issued prior to the performance of any work within a
confined space. The CSEP will become a part of the permanent and
official health and safety record for the response action at the Site;
natural ventilation shall be provided for the confined space prior to
initial entry and for the duration of the CSEP. Positive/forced
mechanical ventilation may be required. However, care should be
taken to not spread contamination outside of the enclosed area;
if flammable liquids are anticipated to be within the confined space,
explosion proof equipment will be used. All equipment shall be
positively grounded;
the contents of any confined space shall, where necessary and where
possible, be removed prior to entry. All sources of ignition must be
disconnected and/or removed prior to entry;
vii) hand tools used in confined spaces shall be in good repair, explosion
proof and spark proof, and selected according to intended use. Where
possible, pneumatic power tools, are to be used;
viii) hand-held lights and other illumination utilized in confined spaces
shall be equipped with guards to prevent contact with the bulb and
must be explosion proof;
B-28 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
· ix) compressed gas cylinders, except cylinders used for self-contained
breathing apparatus, shall not be taken into confined spaces. Gas hoses
shall be removed from the space and the supply turned off at the
cylinder valve when personnel exit from the confined space;
x) if a confined space requires respiratory equipment or where rescue may
be difficult, safety belts, body harnesses, extraction equipment and
lifelines will be used. The outside observer shall be provided with the
same equipment as those working within the confined space;
xi) a ladder or extraction device is required in all confined spaces deeper
than the employee's shoulders. The ladder shall be secured and not
removed until all employees have existed the confined space;
xii) only SCBA or NIOSH approved airline respirators equipped with a
5-minute emergency air supply (egress bottle) shall be used in untested
confined spaces or in any confined space with conditions determined
immediately dangerous to life and health; -·'
xiii) where air-moving equipment is used to provide ventilation, chemicals .·:
shall be removed from the vicinity to prevent their introduction into
the confined space;
xiv) vehicles shall not be left running near confined space work or near
air-moving equipment being used for confined space ventilation;
xv) smoking in confined spaces will be prohibited at all times; and
xvi) any deviation from these confined space entry procedures requires the
prior permission of the HSO.
B-29 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
m
m
m
g
g
0
D
0
0:
D
0
0
D
0
I
E
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
B.17.3 PROCEDURE FOR CONFINED SP ACE ENTRY
The HSO and confined space entry personnel shall adhere
to the following confined space entry procedures:
i) evaluate the job to be done and identify the potential hazards before a
job in a confined space is scheduled;
ii) ensure that all process piping, mechanical and electrical equipment,
etc., have been disconnected, purged, blanked-off or locked and tagged
as necessary;
iii) if possible, ensure removal of any standing fluids that may produce
toxic or air displacing gases, vapors or dust;
iv) initiate a CSEP in concurrence with the Engineer or designated
alternative;
v) ensure that any hot work (welding, burning, open flames or spark
producing operation) that is to be performed in the confined space has
been approved by the Engineer and is indicated on the CSEP;
vi) ensure that the confined space is ventilated before starting work in the
confined space and for the duration of the time that the work is to be
performed in the confined space;
vii) ensure that the personnel who enter the confined space and the
confined space observer helper are familiar with the contents and
requirements of this instruction and the CSEP;
viii) ensure remote atmospheric testing of the confined space prior to and
during employee entry and before validation/revalidation of a CSEP to
ensure the following requirements:
a) oxygen content between 19.5 percent -23.0 percent,
B-30 CONESTOCA·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
ix)
b)
c)
d)
no concentration of combustible gas in the space. Sampling will
be done throughout the confined space and specifically at the
lowest point in the space,
the absence of other atmospheric contaminants if the space has
previously contained toxic, corrosive or irritant material, and
if remote testing is not possible, Level B PPE is required for
confined space entry;
designate whether hot or cold work will be allowed. If all tests are
satisfactory, complete the CSEP listing any safety precautions, protective
equipment or other requirements; and
x) ensure that a copy of the CSEP is posted at the work Site, a copy is filed
with the work supervisor and a copy is furnished to the Engineer.
The CSEP shall be considered void if work in the confined
space does not start within one hour after the tests in Item viii) above are
performed or if significant changes within the confined space atmosphere or
job scope occurs.
The CSEP posted at the work Site shall be removed at the
completion of the job or the end of the shift, whichever is first.
B.17.4 CONFINED SPACE OBSERVER
The duties of the confined space observer are as follows:
i) while personnel are inside the confined space, a confined space
observer will monitor the activities and provide external assistance to
those in the confined space. The observer will not have other duties
which may take his attention away from the work or require him to
leave the vicinity of the confined space at any time while personnel are
in the confined space;
CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
g
0
0
D
D
-11 --·II·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
ii) the confined space observer sha\l maintain at least voice contact with
all personnel in the confined space. Visual contact is preferred, if
possible;
iii) the confined space observer shall be instructed by his supervisor or the
HSO in the method for contacting rescue personnel in the event of an
emergency;
iv) if irregularities within the confined space are detected by the observer,
personnel within the confined space will be ordered to exit;
v) in the event of an emergency, the confined space observer must not
enter the confined space prior to contacting and receiving assistance
from a helper. Prior to this time, he should attempt to remove
personnel with the lifeline and to perform all other rescue functions
from outside the space; and
vi) a helper shall be designated to provide assistance to the confined space
observer in case the observer must enter the confined space to retrieve
personnel.
B-32 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
B.18.0
(1)
3669 {18)
HEAT STRESS
The combination of warm ambient temperature and
protective clothing increases the potential for heat stress. In particular, heat
stress can be evident as:
i) heat rash;
ii) heat cramps;
iii) heat exhaustion; and/ or
iv) heat stroke.
These hazards will be discussed during daily safety meetings before
commencement of work activities, when relevant. Personnel must increase
consumption of water and electrolyte-containing beverages, such as Gatorade,
during warm and hot weather conditions.
At a minimum, workers will break approximately every
two hours for 10-to 15-minute rest periods. In addition, workers will be
encouraged to take rests whenever they feel any adverse effects that may be
heat related. The frequency of breaks may need to be increased upon worker
recommendation to the HSO.
A work/rest schedule will be calculated based on heat
stress monitoring results. Monitoring will consist of taking the radial pulse
of a worker for 30 seconds immediately after exiting the work area. The
frequency of monitoring the radial pulse will be as follows:
Ambient Temp. Modified Level D PPE(l) Level C PPE/Level B
90°F or above After 45 min. of work After 15 min. of work
87.5°F -90°F After 60 min. of work After 30 min. of work
82.5°F -87.5°F After 90 min. of work After 60 min. of work
77.5°F -82.5°F After 120 min. of work After 90 min. of work
72.5°F -77.5°F After 150 min. of work After 120 min. of work
Tyveks on top of Level D PPE.
· B-33 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
m
D
0
0
D
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
I
0
I
D
D
a
u
0
D
ff
I
D
I
D
D
a
D
D
D
u 3669 (18)
If the heart rate exceeds 110 beats per minute at the
beginning of the rest period, the next work cycle will be shortened by 1/2 and
the rest period will be kept the same. If the heart rate still exceeds 110 beats
per minute at the next rest period, the following rest period will be increased
by 1/3. The initial rest period will be at least five minutes.
Monitoring for heat stress will begin when the ambient
temperature reaches or exceeds 70°F when wearing Level C or Level B PPE, or
80°F when wearing Level D PPE and humidity levels are above 50 percent.
B-34 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
B.19.0 COLD STRESS
3669 (18)
With outdoor work in the winter months, the potential
exists for hypothermia and frostbite.
Protective clothing greatly reduces the possibility of
hypothermia in workers. However, personnel will be instructed to wear
warm clothing and to stop work to obtain more clothing if they become too
cold. Employees must also change into dry clothes if their clothing becomes
wet from perspiration or from exposure to precipitation.
In cold weather, the potential for frostbite exists, especially
in body extremities. Personnel must pay particular attention to hands, feet
and any exposed skin when dressing. Personnel will be advised to obtain
more clothing if they begin to experience loss of sensation due to cold
exposure.
Employees will be encouraged to seek heated shelter at
regular intervals, depending upon the severity of ambient temperatures.
Symptoms of cold stress, including heavy shivering, excessive fatigue,
•
ii
drowsiness, irritability or euphoria will necessitate immediate return to the I
heated shelter.
B-35 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
u
I
B
D
0
I ATTACHMENT B-1
D
TRAINING ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM
I
9
a
D
' a
-
I
I
I 3669 (18)
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
' ' ' I
e
t
t
D
ft
·B
fl
I
TRAINING ACKNOWLEDGMENT FORM
Please Print
NAME:
ADDRESS:
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER:
EMPLOYER:
JOB SITE: TADCO-HUGHES SITE. GASTON COUNTY. NORTH
CAROLINA
I have attended and understood the mandatory site-specific initiation session for the
above referenced job site. This program referenced the following topics:
i) known potential hazards on site;
ii) level of personal protection equipment required;
iii) emergency procedures for the site; and
iv) the basics of the Site-specific Health and Safety Plan.
I further confirm that I have the required 40 hours of training to comply with
29 CFR 1910.120, have a respirator for which I have been fit tested and have been
thoroughly trained on the standard operating procedures of equipment I will be
operating or procedures (i.e. confined space) which I will be participating in.
Date Signature
3669 (18) CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I ,,
I
' ' ATTACHMENT B-2
' CONFINED SP ACE ENTRY PERMIT t
t
' t
' a
tt
I
' '---·
D 3669 (18)
I
I CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT
I SITE NAME/LOCATION/REF. NO.: !adco-Hughcs Site
I
Gaston Count)c, North Carolina
I WORK ACTIVITY:
Duration: Issue Date: Ttm:,: Filled Out by:
I
I POTENTIAL HAZARDS:
(System Generated)
' ,,
0
t
' (Work Generated)
I
:t
' I
AIR MONITORING: PRE-ENTRY PERIODIC CONTINUOUS
I
I
3669 08) B-2-1 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT
DATE/TIME
ISOLATION:
BY
(]NIT)
ppm
co
Purging Required: YES NO
Safety Tags Required: YES
VENTILATION REQUIRED: YES
CONTINUOUS
NO
NO
OTHER
EMERGENCY RESCUE EQUIPMENT REQUIRED:
________ Communications Device
________ .First Aid Kit
________ S.tretcher /Backboard
________ Fire Extinguisher
________ SCBA
%
LEL
OTHER TEST
TYPE RESULT
PURGING CONFIRMED:
________ Winch/Hoist
________ Harness with Lifeline
(type)
________ PPE (type)
________ Lighting (type)
________ Otrcr _______________________ _
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I ,,.
,,-. ,, ,.
g
-u
tl .,
' I
3669 (18) B-2-2 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
u
8
D
I
I
I
f
I ,,
I} ,,
I
I ,,
~I
I'
' ' ,,
I
I
CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT REQUIRED:
________ Hardhat
________ ,Safety Glasses
________ Face Shield
________ Ear Plugs/Muff
________ Emergency Escape Pack
________ Lanyards
________ Respiratory Protection
(type)
________ Coveralls
Chemical Suits
________ Rain Suits
________ Li,fclines
________ Qovcs(typc) _____________________ _
________ Hamcs.<c;(typc) ____________________ _
________ Olrr _______________________ _
ADDITIONAL WORK INSTRUCTIONS:
EMERGENCY CONTACT PHONE NO., ___________ _
PERSONS ENTERING CONFINED SPACE (PRINT NAME)
ST AND BY PERSON REQUIRED: YES:~ ___ NO~ ___ ,(PRINT NAMES)
3669 {18) B-2 - 3 CONESTOCA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT
I have reviewed and met the requirements of this permit and expect that this work shall be done
safely. Entrants have been instructed on the proper confined space entry procedures, requirements and
conditions.
ENTRY AUTI-IORIZED BY:. ____________ _ DATE:~---------
All work under this permit has been completed and all materials and entrants have been withdrawn
from the confined space.
Attendant or Entrant Date
3669 08) B-2-4 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & AssOOATES
I
j
' I
' I, ,.
I ,,
\.•
I ,.·
I
t
'I
,I ,,
I
I
I
I
:I
I
I
I
.a APPENDIXC
"
I CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN
I
I
.I
I
I
')
I -
I
' I 3669 (18}
' I
I j
I ,I
I
I , .... ·
I
t
I
I ,.
I
I
I
' 1.
I
I '-:
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
C.1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................... : ....................................... C-1
C.2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................... C-2
C.3.0 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILffiES ................................ C-3
C.3.1 PROJECT MANAGER. ............................................................................... C-3
C.3.2 PROJECT ENGINEER. ................................................................................ C-3
C.3.3 RESIDENT ENGINEER ............................................................................. C-4
C.3.4 CQA SUPPORT PERSONNEL. ................................................................. C-4
C.3.5 QA/QC TEST LABORATORIES .............................................................. C-5
C.3.6 CONTRACTOR ........................................................................................... C-5
C.4.0 PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS ....................................................................... C-6
C.4.1 RESIDENT ENGINEER ............................................................................. C-6
C.4.2 CQA SUPPORT PERSONNEL. ................................................................. C-6
C.4.3 CONTRACTOR ........................................................................................... C-6
C.5.0 PROJECT MEETINGS ............................................................................................. C-8
C.5.1 PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING ........................................................... C-8
C.5.2 DAILY PROGRESS MEETINGS ............................................................... C-9
C.5.3 PERIODIC PROGRESS MEETINGS ......................................................... C-9
C.5.4 PROBLEM OR WORK DEFICIENCY MEETINGS ............................... C-10
C.6.0 INSPECTION AND TESTING ACTIVITIES ..................................................... C-11
C.6.1 SCOPE ............................................................................................................ C-11
C.6.2 INSPECTIONS ............................................................................................. C-12
C.6.3 TESTING ....................................................................................................... C-14
C.7.0 CQA DOCUMENTATION .................................................................................... C-15
C.7.1 GENERAL. .................................................................................................... C-15
C.7.2 CONTRACTORS DAILY LOG BOOK ..................................................... C-15
C.7.3 CQA INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION ................................................... C-16
C.7.4 INSPECTION LOG BOOK ......................................................................... C-16
C.7.5 PROBLEM/CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS ................................... C-17
C.7.6 WORK TASK REPORTS ........................................................................... C-18
C.7.7 REMEDIAL ACTION (RA) REPORT ...................................................... C-18
C.7.8 STORAGE OF RECORDS .......................................................................... C-19
3669 (18) CONESTOGA·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I ./
I
I
I
,I
I'
1,
I
Ii
I
I
I
I
t
I
I -.
I '."/
I
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE C.3.1 PROJECT ORGANIZATION
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE C.6.1 SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION
QUALITY ASSURANCE 1NSPECTIONS
TABLE C.6.2 SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION
Following
Page
C-3
C-13
QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS C-14
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT C-1 TYPICAL CONTRACTORS DAILY LOG BOOK
3669 (18) CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOOATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
ff
ff
fl
fl
C.1.0 INTRODUCTION
3669 08)
This Construction Quality Assurance Plan (CQAP)
presents the quality assurance program to be implemented during the
Remedial Action (RA) as detailed in the RA Work Plan, to ensure that the
components of the RA are constructed to meet or exceed all design criteria,
plans and specifications. This report is organized as follows:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
Section C.1.0 presents the background information, purpose and
organization of the report;
Section C.2.0 provides a description of the project;
Section C.3.0 outlines the project organization and responsibilities;
Section C.4.0 presents the personnel qualifications requirements;
Section C.5.0 presents the project meeting requirements;
vi) Section C.6.0 describes the inspection and testing activities required to
ensure that construction and materials comply with all design
specifications and plans; and
vii) Section C.7.0 describes documentation requirements of construction
quality assurance (CQA) activities.
Construction specifications for the Remedial Action
components are provided in the Appenclices to the Final Design Report, and
also in the Construction Drawings provided in the Final Design Report.
C-1 CONESTOCA·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
C.2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3669 (18)
The major components of the RA to be implemented at
the Site consist of the following:
1)
2)
Excavation and repair of the damaged sections of the Site culvert
followed by slip-lining of the culvert with butt-welded polyethylene
pipe, construction of a gravity drainage line to carry uncontaminated
groundwater from the spring discharge to the Tributary B north of the
Former Operations Area and construction of a surface water diversion
consisting of a Site spillway.
Construction of a groundwater extraction system within the Site
boundaries including four extraction wells, in areas of elevated
contaminant levels, a subsurface drainage tile trench to collect
contaminated groundwater and a groundwater collection sump in the
annulus of the slip-lined culvert to collect groundwater that is
presently discharging to the culvert;
3) Construction of an on-Site treatment system. The system shall consist
of aeration and equalization tanks. The air vented from the aeration
tank shall be treated by carbon adsorption. The effluent from the
treatment system shall be pumped to the City of Mount Holly sanitary
sewer system manhole for subsequent treatment at the publicly owned
'
4)
5)
treatment works (POTW);
Treatment of soils in the former landfill and approximately 500 c.y. of
soil from the Former Operations Area which are to be consolidated
into the former landfill; and
Construction of a soil flushing system utilizing some of the
components of the SVE system and installing a soil flushing collection
trench for future operation. This SVE system construction includes the
consolidation of surplus excavated soils from the groundwater
extraction system and treatment facility construction into a soil cap on
the surface of the former landfill.
C-2 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I·
C.3.0 PROTECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
3669 (18)
The remedial construction activities will be supervised by
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (CRA). The project organization chart is
presented on Figure C.3.1. A brief description of the duties of the key
personnel are presented below.
C.3.1 PROTECT MANAGER
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
The duties of the Project Manager are as follows:
provides overall project management;
ensures professional services by' CRA are cost effective and of highest
quality;
ensures all resources of CRA are available on an as-required basis;
participates in key technical negotiations with USEP A; and
provides managerial and technical guidance to CRA's Project Engineer.
C.3.2 PROTECT ENGINEER
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
The duties of the Project Engineer are as follows:
provides day-to-day project management;
provides managerial guidance to CRA's technical group;
provides technical representation at meetings as appropriate;
retains testing firms to perform' quality control field/laboratory tests;
and
prepares and reviews reports.
C-3 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
" m
I
m
u
B'
• u
8
I'
' I
I
I
II
USEPA-REGION IV NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
MICHAEL TOWNSEND AND NATURAL RESOURCES
JADCO-HUGHES
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
PROJECT MANAGER
STEPHEN OU!GLEY
PROJECT ENGINEER
J£ANN£ CHEW
RESIDENT ENGINEER
FIELD ACTIVITIES
QA/QC TEST
LABORATORIES
CQA SUPPORT PERSONNEL eg. -SURVEYING
CRA
3669 (18) JAN 28/94(W) REV.1 (C-04)
-GEOTECHNICAL
-ANALYTICAL
SELECTED
REMEDIAL
CONTRACTOR
figure C.3.1
PROJECT ORGANIZATION
REMEDIAL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
JADCO-HUGHES SITE
Gaston County, NC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RICHARD G. SHEPHERD. B.A.Sc .• P. Eng.
EDUCATION:
B.A.Sc. University of Waterloo 1975
Numerous continuing education courses and seminars in hydrogeology, waste
management, construction management and health & safety: 1980 to present.
EMPLOYMENT:
1983-
Present
1981-
1983
1979-81
1976-79
1975-76
1974-75
1974-75
1973
1971-72
1968-71
Principal
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Associate
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Senior Engineer
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Engineering Services Manager
Malawi/Canada Railway Project
Project Engineer, Steed and Evans Co. Ltd., Kitchener
Project Supervisor, Steed and Evans Co. Ltd., Kitchener
University of Waterloo, Department of Civil Engineering
Construction Layout Supervisor,
Steed and Evans Co. Ltd., Kitchener
Design Technician, City of Brantford Engineering Department
Survey party chief, J. D. Lee Engineering
Limited, Kingston and Brantford
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario
Canadian Society of Civil Engineers
D
Richard G. Shepherd D
PROFILE OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:
• Corporate responsibility for all administration and project management of
remedial construction related to remedial action implementation.
• Corporate responsibility for Health and Safety.
• Corporate responsibility for Analytical Services.
• Senior Engineering Supervisor /Project Manager for in excess of 600
environmental remedial projects. Areas of experience with selected example
projects are:
Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Studies
-Hardeman County Site, Hardeman County, Tennessee (NPL Site)
-Yellow Water Road Site, Baldwin Florida (NPL Site)
-Love Springs Site, Cherokee County, South Carolina (State Listed Site)
-Carolawn Site, Chester County, South Carolina (NPL Site)
-Mallory Capacitor Site, Waynesboro, Tennessee (NPL Site)
-North Hollywood Dump, Memphis Tennessee (NPL Site)
-C. L. Hale Site, Ohio (NPL Site)
-Jadco-Hughes Site, North Carolina (NPL Site)
-FMC South Site, Fridley, Minnesota (NPL Site)
-Universal Manufacturing, Bridgeport, Connecticut (State Listed Site)
-FMC Plant Site, Middleport, N.Y. (State·Listed Site)
-Mallory Site, Glasgow, Kentucky
-Tonawanda Coke, Tonawanda, N.Y. (State Listed Site)
-Cedartown Landfill, Cedartown, Georgia (NPL Site)
-Packaging Corporation of America Site, Manistee, .Michigan (NPL Site)
-Vulcan Cincinnati Site, Northport, Michigan (State Listed Site)
-Heavy manufacturing complex, Peoria, Illinois (State Listed Site)
-J. I. Case Site, Terre Haute, Indiana (State Listed Site)
-Ellis Road Site, Jacksonville, Florida (NPL) Site
Design and Project Management of Remedial Construction
-Decommissioning of PCB contaminated waste oil recycling facility,
Dearborn, Michigan (CERCLA 106 Order)
-Chem-Dyne Site, Hamilton, Ohio (NPL Site)
-Yellow Water Road Site, Baldwin, Florida (NPL Site)
2
D
0
D
D
0
D
0
D
0
D
D
0
0
I
0
D
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
D
D
D
D
I
I
I
u
Richard G. Shepherd
Ellis Road Site, Jacksonville, Florida (NPL Site)
-North Hollywood Dump, Memphis, Tennessee (NPL Site)
-Hardeman County Landfill, Tennessee (NPL Site)
-LaBounty Landfill Site, Charles City, Iowa (NPL Site)
-PAS Site, Oswego, New York (NPL Site)
Bluff Road Site, Columbia, South Carolina (NPL Site)
-Decontamination of four capacitor plapts, Kentucky, Tennessee and Indiana
-Universal Manufacturing Sites, Totowa; New Jersey and Bridgeport,
Connecticut (State Listed Sites)
-Love Canal, Niagara Falls, New York (NPL Site)
-Plant demolition and cleanup, Racine; Wisconsin (private action)
-Waukegan Asbestos Landfill, Waukegan, Illinois (NPL Site)
-Cleanup and demolition of manufacturing plant, Manville, New Jersey (State
Site)
-Velsicol Chemical Corporation Site, Marshall, Illinois (NPL Site)
-Pentachlorophenol Site Remediation, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (State)
-Michigan Chemical Site, St. Louis, Michigan (NPL Site)
Acquisition/Sale of Industrial/Commercial Facilities
-Facility assessment, recommendation of remedial measures, design of
remedial measures for 21 operating companies in seven States in Illinois
bankruptcy case
-Site assessment, design of remedial measures, management of remedial
construction for 300 surplus properties (heavy equipment dealerships, parts
distribution centers and manufacturing plants across U.S.A. and Canada)
-Assessment and investigation of a 76 retail gasoline facility chain,
recommendation of remedial actions, preparation of remedial cost estimates
(Florida, Georgia)
Assessment and investigation of nine 'bottling facilities in Louisiana,
Arkansas and Texas, recommendation of remedial actions, preparation of
remedial cost es ti mates
-Assessment and investigation of retail/wholesale gasoline chain,
recommendation of remedial actions, preparation of remedial cost estimates
(North Carolina, South Carolina)
-Assessment and remediation of 12 bottling and distribution facilities with
respect to underground storage tanks (Georgia, North Carolina,
South Carolina)
-Assessment and investigation of 8,000-acre manufacturing and mining
complex, development of remedial alternatives, preparation of remedial cost
estimates, technical assistance in negotiation of Agreement and Covenant
Not to Sue with USEPA (Tennessee)
-Environmental Assessments of 14 manufacturing companies, preparation of
3
Richard G. Shepherd
remedial plans to bring facilities into compliance, preparation of cost
estimates as part of Chapter 7 proceedings for bankrupt holding company
(Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Sou th Carolina)
-Environmental assessments of two cement companies and nine terminals,
preparation of remedial work plans, preparation of remedial cost estimates
(Iowa, Mississippi)
Environmental Assessments of nine manufacturing facilities, preparation of
remedial recommendations and cost estimates (Brazil)
Environmental Assessments of manufacturing and bottling facilities,
preparation of remedial recommendations and cost estimates (Belgium,
France, Swaziland)
-Environmental Assessment, design of remedial measures, management of
remedial construction for heavy manufacturing facility (Germany)
Environmental Assessment, hydrogeologic investigation, design of remedial
measures, management of remedial construction at metal plating facility
(Indiana)
Environmental Assessments of seven bottling/ distribution facilities,
preparation of remedial cost estimates and compliance recommendations
(North Carolina and Virginia)
-Environmental Assessments of three bottling/ distribution facilities,
preparation of remedial cost estimates and compliance recommendations
(Sou th Carolina)
Technical Negotiator for Consent Order/ Agreements
or Selected Remedy Settlements
-Michigan Chemical Site, St. Louis Michigan (USEP A, MDNR)
-FMC Fridley Site, Fridley, Minnesota (USEPA, MPCA)
-North Hollywood Dump, Memphis, Tennessee (USEPA, TDHE)
-Two manufacturing sites (IBM), New York (NYDEC)
-Decommissioning of Waste Oil Recycling Facility, Dearborn, Michigan
(USEPA)
Yellow Water Road Site, Baldwin, Florida (USEPA, FDER)
-Several Remedial Actions, Middleport, New York (NYDEC)
Mallory Site, Crawfordsville, Indiana (USEP A, IDEM)
-Chem-Dyne Site, Hamilton, Ohio (USEP A, OEPA)
-Summit National Site, Deerfield County, Ohio (USEPA, OEPA)
-Miami County Incinerator Site, Troy, Ohio (USEPA, OEPA)
-Mallory Site, Waynesboro, Tennessee (USEPA, TDHE)
-Sun Bank Site, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (FDER)
-CIW Site, Romulus, Michigan (USEPA, MDNR)
-Vulcan Site, Northport, Michigan (USEPA, MDNR)
-Ventron Site, Woodbridge, New Jersey (NJDEP)
4
D
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Richard G. Shepherd
-J. I. Case Site, Terre Haute, Indiana (IDNR)
-Love Springs Site, South Carolina (SCDHEC)
'
Peer Review of RI/FS, ROD, RD/RA or Administrative Record
-American Chemical Services Site, Griffith, Indiana (NPL Site)
-Wayne Recycling Site, Columbia City, Indiana (NPL Site)
-Arlington Blending/Galloway Pits, Tennessee (NPL Site)
-Picketville Landfill, Jacksonville, Florida (NPL Site)
-Mabray Engineering Site, Alabama (NPL Site)
-United Scrap Lead Site, Troy, Ohio (NPL Site)
-Three RI/FS's at manufacturing facilities in three States (confidential)
-Newport Dump, Newport, Kentucky (NPL Site)
-Fultz Landfill, Cambridge Ohio (NPL Site)
Expert Testimony
-Litigation involving PCB and volatile organic contamination of building, soil
and groundwater in Waynesboro, Tennessee. Testimony focussed on
appropriate level of cleanup, construction methods to be used for cleanup,
cost of cleanup.
-Litigation involving excavation and disposal of drummed wastes and
contaminated soils, Picillio Site, Rhode Island. Testimony focussed on
appropriateness of remedial construction techniques employed by State,
appropriateness of costs incurred by State.
-Litigation involving contamination of soils and groundwater at former
gasoline station in Charlotte, North Carolina. Testimony focussed on
contaminant source identification, contaminant transport, remediation costs.
-Litigation involving soil and groundwater contamination in Royal Oak,
Michigan. Testimony focussed on contaminant source identification,
contaminant transport, remediation techniques and costs.
-Litigation involving soil contamination in St. Louis, Michigan. Testimony
focussed on contaminant source identification and contaminant transport.
-Five cases pending (North Carolina, South Carolina, Iowa, Indiana,
Michigan) involving VOC contaminated groundwater (toxic tort), release
from and remediation of USTs and contents; appropriateness of methods
used and costs incurred for facility PCB decontamination work; divisibility of
former and current releases from furniture refinishing manufacturer.
5
Richard G. Shepherd
-Environmental Assessments of three bottling/ distribution facilities,
preparation of remedial cost estimates and compliance recommendation
(North Carolina).
Environmental Assessments of 17 bottling/ distribution facilities, preparation
of remedial cost estimates and compliance recommendation (Brazil)
Special Court Master
-Appointed Special Court Master to the Federal District Court, Northern
District, Illinois. Responsible for the administration, design and management
of remedial activities including the decommissioning, asset recovery,
demolition and surficial cleanup of a 270-acre oil refinery in East Chicago,
Indiana.
Cost Allocation
Provided technical assistance in development of cost allocation strategies for
potentially responsible parties (PRPs) including database preparation and
remedial component analysis
-Newport Dump Site, Newport, Kentucky (NPL Site)
-Miami County Incinerator Site, Troy, Ohio (NPL Site)
-Hunts Disposal Landfill, Wisconsin (NPL Site)
-Hardage Site, Criner, Oklahoma (NPL Site).
6
0
0
D
D
fl
B
•
m
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
STEPHEN M. QUIGLEY. B. Tech .. P. Eng.
EDUCATION:
1979-84 B. Tech. (Chemical Engineering), Ryerson Polytechnical Institute
EMPLOYMENT:
1991 -
present
1989 -90
1988-89
1987-88
1984-87
1984
Project Manager,
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Project Engineer,
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Project Engineer,
Canada Packers Specialty Chemical Group
Production Foreman,
Canada Packers Specialty Chemicals Group
Health, Safety and Environmental Supervisor,
Canada Packers Chemicals Division
Quality Control Technician,
Canada Packers Chemicals Division
AFFILIATIONS:
Member -Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario.
PROFILE OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:
• Environmental Engineer responsible for one or more of the following: site
investigation, site characterization, feasibility studies, litigation/hearings
support, remedial design; contract document and specification preparation, and
construction supervision for the following projects/ clients:
-Remediation engineering project manager for groundwater, buried waste,
environmental audit and Environmental Appeal Board hearings -Uniroyal
Chemical Ltd., Elmira, Ontario, 1989 -ongoing.
Stephen M. Quigley
-Project Manager for Remedial Investigation (RI), Feasibility Study (FS),
Remedial Design (RD) and Remedial Action (RA) including coordination of
field work, database management, laboratory service coordination,
preparation of Treatability Study Work Plans, completion of RI and FS
reports, supervision of PCB-contaminated soil excavation and off-Site
disposal, preparation of RD and Work Plans and development of RD
documents, for a former solvent recycling/ disposal facility, Jadco-Hughes
NPL Site, Belmont, North Carolina (Generator Group), 1989 -ongoing.
-Project Manager for drum removal action, including development of Work
Plan, Contract Documents and Specifications and provision of Construction
Supervision, Northline Drums Site, Wayne County, Michigan.
-Remedial Investigation, including development of Work Plans, Contract
Documents and Specifications, waste excavation including buried drums and
contaminated soil, Cherokee County, South Carolina, 1991 -ongoing.
-Technical manager, provision of technical advice and expert witness
testimony, preparation and implementation RI/FS Work Plan, West Central
Phoenix/West Osborn Site, Maricopa County, Arizona, 1991 -ongoing.
-Technical manager, completion of site investigation, provision of technical
advice in negotiations with state agency and USEPA regarding issuance of a
RCRA HSWA permit, Florida, 1991 -ongoing.
-Remedial Action, design of remedial measures for a drummed inventory of ·
wood treating solution recovered from underground storage tanks, including
the development of woi-k plans and contract documents and construction
supervision, and implementation and completion of a Contamination
Assessment Report, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 1989 -ongoing.
-Project Manager for Feasibility Study, RD/RA development and evaluation of
remedial alternatives for a former hazardous waste landfill including the
preparation and oversight of a TO-1/T0-2 air monitoring program, critique of
the EPA Risk Assessment, preparation and implementation of RD/RA Work
Plans, Consent Decree negotiations, design and implementation of remedy,
(Cap, groundwater extraction/trenching, reinjection system, soil vapor
extraction system), Hassayarnpa Landfill NPL Site, Maricopa County, Arizona,
(PRP Group), 1989 -ongoing.
-Technical overview of groundwater remedial action plan and technical
review of 30% Remedial Design for a VOC contaminated aquifer, Indian Bend
2
m
m
u
D
fl
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
u
·I
u
I
a
m
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Stephen M. Quigley
Wash NPL Site Operable Unit Feasibility Study and Record of Decision,
Scottsdale, Arizona NPL Site (PRP Grciup), 1989-1991.
-Litigation support including preparation of a critique of a contractor's Rl/FS, a
conceptual closure design and reports •on state-of-the-art of landfill practise,
19th Avenue Landfill NPL Site, Maricopa County, Arizona, 1990-ongoing.
-Litigation support for suit related to the potential contamination of a food
product including plant assessment, collection of environmental samples and
data assessment (location confidential) 1990 -ongoing.
-Project Manager and Auditor, site assessments for four automotive plastic
injection molding plants, Ontario, Canada and Michigan, 1992.
-Auditor, site assessments for soft drink bottling plants, North Carolina, 1992.
-Critique of plaintiff's release estimates, air dispersion modeling and litigation
support related to U.S. Department of Energy Facility (PRP), 1989-1991.
-Technical coordination of intervenor group -cogeneration and hydrogen
production, environmental assessment hearings related to 25-year
Demand/Supply Plan, Ontario Hydro, 1991 -ongoing.
-Remedial action -oil recovery system, including work plan development,
permitting, negotiation of Contract Documents and Specifications, Rock
Island, Illinois, 1990-1991.
-Site assessment and evaluation of remedial alternatives, former solvent
bulking and storage facility, Hartford, Connecticut 1989 -ongoing.
-Plant Assessment for discharges to municipal treatment plant including a
critique of municipal consultants sewage treatment plant design, data
assessment, plant operations assessment, design and construction of
pretreatment facilities, dairy plant, O1:}tario, 1990 -1992.
-Assessment of a conventional spray irrigation effluent treatment system for a
dairy plant, Ontario, 1991 -1992.
• Technical Specialist/Project Engineer for the following project areas:
-development and implementation of environmental waste treatment and
general engineering projects;
3
Stephen M. Quigley
-supervision and operation of a continuous batch process specialty chemical
plant;
-development and implementation of an Environmental Protection Plan and
spill response plan for Canadian chemical manufacturer;
-preparation of hazardous effluent _discharge permits;
-project management of source monitoring for small scale S02 emission
generator;
-development and implementation of national training program for
dangerous goods transportation and health, safety and environmental
protection;
-participation in environmental risk assessments;
-co-development of corporate health and safety rating system for a Canadian
food company; ·
-development and implementation of industrial. hygiene surveys and
analyses; and
-supervision of the development on asbestos removal training program.
PUBLICATIONS AND SEMINARS
Laboratory Decommissioning, OH&S Canada, November/December 1992.
Integration of Environmental Management and Occupational Health and Safety,
Occupational Safety and Health '91 Conference ..
Evolution of Environmental Regulations in Ontario, Canadian Society of Safety
Engineers Meeting, February 1991.
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
JEANNE CHEW. B.A.Sc
EDUCATION:
B.A.Sc. Chemical Engineering
University of Waterloo, 1991
OTHER COURSES:
40-Hour OSHA Health and Safety Training
29 CFR 1910.120, February, 1992
EMPLOYMENT:
1991 -
Present
1990
1989
1988
1987
Environmental Engineer
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates·
Junior Environmental Engineer
Huskey Oil Operations Limited
Junior Environmental Engineer
Maclaren Engineers Incorporated
Junior Process Engineer
Abitibi-Price
Research Assistant
Petro-Canada
PROFILE OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:
• Preparation of various reports including; ,Proposals for Professional Services,
Rl/FS Reports, RD/RA Work Plans, Sampling and Analysis Plans, Health and
Safety Plans, and Treatability Study Plans,
• Air and Wastewater sampling activities.
• Computer modelling of air dispersion, process control and gas generation in
landfills. ·
• Preparation and expedition of contract documents.
0
Jeanne Chew n
• Cost estimation. D~
• Conducting lab scale treatability studies. 0
• Compliance evaluations with Regulatory Criteria.
• Production operation using statistical process control. 0
• Gasoline Research in catalytic cracking. u
• Data management and analysis.
·D
u
0
U:
,fl
D
n
D
D
I
D
2 0
D
I
I
I
I
I
m
m
I
' u
D
u
I
B
u
D
I
B
D
WOLFGANG (WOLFE) K. F. ENGLER, C.E.T.
EDUCATION:
Diploma
Course
Certification
Course
Civil Technician, 1970, Cambrian College, Sudbury Campus
Practical Environmental Law, 1985
Civil Technologist, 1986, Ontario Association of Certified
Engineering Technicians and: Technologists
Environmental Compliance Audits and Site Assessments, 1989
EXPERIENCE: .
1980-
Present
1981-
Present
1976-81
1975-76
1975
1971-75
TRAINING:
Associate
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Resident Engineer
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Manager, Kincardine Branch
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Manager -Kincardine Branch
Conestoga Engineering Limited ·
Proctor and Redfern Consulting Engineers
Dennis Consultants Limited
-Compliance with OSHA 1910.120 and 1910.134 requirements
Asbestos Abatement Supervisor -State of Minnesota
AFFILIATIONS:
Engineering Technologist -1986, Ontario Association of Certified Engineering
Technicians & Technologists
Technical Affiliate -The Engineering Institute of Canada
Wolfgang (Wolfe) K.F. Engler
Technical Affiliate -The Canadian Society for Civil Engineering
Member -American Society of Certified Engineering Technicians (ASCET)
COMMUNITY AFFILIATIONS:
Past-President -Kincardine Rotary Club
PROFILE OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:
-Resident Engineer and assistant Project Manager, asbestos abatement, lead
abatement and PCB sampling, cleanunp and removal -Old Mack Stamping
Plant, Chrysler Corporation, Detroit, Michigan
-Resident Engineer Supervisor, lab pack removal, and tank and process pipe
cleaning, White Chemical Site, Newark, New Jersey
-Resident Engineer Supervisor, PCB contaminated soil and concrete removal,
Totowa, New Jersey
-Resident Engineer and assistant Project Manager, Asbestos Abatement, UST
removal, PCB cleanup, installation of 20-acre cap, installation of a discharge basin
and lagoon closures, former Johns Manville Site, Manville, New Jersey
-Fourteen years experience in field investigations, design, contract administration
and field supervision of numerous environmentally oriented projects
-Site Monitoring Supervisor, drum and contaminated soil characterization,
cleanup and removal -Love Springs Site, Cherokee County, South Carolina
-Resident Supervisor in charge of site survey, drummed waste cleanup,
hazardous waste inventory and removal, including lab packs, unknown
cylinders, air and water reactives and shock sensitive materials -Former
Recycling Site, Bluff Road, Columbia, South Carolina
-Resident Engineer for drum sampling, waste characterization, staging, site
securement and disposal -Gibbs Plating Site, Charlotte, North Carolina
-Resident Supervisor and assistant project manager, securement of hazardous
waste landfill, Velsicol Chemical Co., Hardeman County, Tennessee
2
g
g
u
m
g
11
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
'
I
I
I
a
B
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Wolfgang (Wolfe) K.F. Engler
-Resident Engineer, waste characterization, cleanup and disposal of surficial
drummed and tanked hazardous wastes -PAS Reclamation Site, Oswego, New
York
-Resident Engineer, drum and contaminated soil characterization, cleanup and
removal, site test trenches and installation of monitoring wells -Ardenwood
Estates, Staten Island, New York
-Site Monitoring Engineer representing PRP group to oversee the Emergency
Response cleanup action by the State of New York for drum and contaminated
soil characterization, cleanup and removal -Novak Farm Site, Chenango
County, New York
-Site Monitoring Supervisor, drum and contaminated soil characterization,
cleanup and removal -Lincklaen, Cortland County, New York
-Resident Engineer and Safety Officer, Cleanup and disposal of contaminated soils
-IBM Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York
-Resident Supervisor and Safety Officer for borehole sampling of contaminated
soils, and installation of monitoring wells -Chem-Dyne Site, Hamilton, Ohio
'
-Field Supervisor and technician for borehole sampling of contaminated soils -
IBM Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York
-Resident Supervisor for test pit and borehole sampling of contaminated soils,
and construction of decontamination facilities -FMC Manufacturing Facility,
Minneapolis, Minnesota
-Site Monitoring Supervisor, drum and contaminated soil removal, test trenches
and sampling and waste characterization program -Nepera, Harriman and
Hamptonburg, Orange County, New York
-Project Manager, planning and design of a major recycling facility -IBM
Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York
-Resident Engineer, storm water retention ~asin -ManviHe Sales Site, Manville,
Somerset County, New Jersey
-Resident Engineer, Asbestos Abatement and Demolition -Manville Sales Site,
Manville, Somerset County, New Jersey
3
Wolfgang (Wolfe) K.F. Engler ·
-Project Manager, planning and design for a construction debris landfill -IBM
Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York
-Project Manager, emergency response and closure of waste fuel and oil
underground storage facility -Brinks Armored Service, Buffalo, New York
-Project Manager, planning, design and supervision of a 45,000-gallon
aboveground Jet A fuel storage, containment and dispensing facility, flight
operations -IBM Corporation, Dutchess County, New York
-Quality Assurance Supervisor, industrial waste treatment plant expansion -IBM
Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York
-Field Supervisor for the disposal of oil refinery products -ECI, East Chicago,
Indiana
-Resident Engineer on numerous environmentally related projects -IBM
Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York
-Resident Engineer, numerous tank closures -IBM Corporation, Poughkeepsie,
New York
-Resident Engineer, numerous tank closures -Johnson and Johnson, New
Brunswick, New Jersey
-Resident Engineer, fuel tank replacements with double wall tanks -IBM
Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York
-Resident Engineer, lagoon closure -IBM Corporation, Poughkeepsie, New York
-Resident Engineer and Safety Officer, Disposal of underground tank -Nassau,
Long Island, New York
-Field technician responsible for securement and disposal of radioactive soils and
equipment -Velsicol Chemical Plant Site, St. Louis, Michigan
-Field technician involved in preliminary and final design, securement of
hazardous waste -Velsicol Chemical Plant Site, St. Louis, Michigan
-Field technician involved in preliminary and final design of several toxic and
hazardous waste projects for Occidental Chemical Co. in the Niagara Falls, New
York area
4
D
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Wolfgang (Wolfe) K.F. Engler
-Seven years experience in design and field supervision of municipal engineering
projects
-Experience in cost analysis for determining project feasibility
Extensive exposure to the planning and approval process of varied forms of
development projects
-Preparation of recreation feasibility studies for municipalities in the Bruce
County area
-Resident inspector for the Bruce Agripark Joint Venture in the construction of a
combined one acre prototype greenhouse and hydroponic house utilizing waste
heat
-Project Manager on several municipal and residential developments in the
Bruce County area. These projects have included the necessary planning and
engineering approval procedures
-Project Manager of a 750 lot subdivision in the Town of Kincardine
-Preliminary field pick-up and design of a 270 lot subdivision in the City of
Sudbury
-Inspector for a Ministry of Transportation and Communications urban road
reconstruction project in the City of Sudbury (urban renewal)
-Design, supervision and inspection of numerous park projects and school sites
in the Sudbury and surrounding areas
-Project coordination, supervision and inspection for a ski hill in Sudbury
employing lighting and snow making apparatus
-Site inspector for numerous subdivisions in the Sudbury and surrounding area
-Twenty-two years experience in field surveying, drafting, minor design for
municipal engineering projects
5
a
u
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MARK C. GUTHRIE, P, Eng.
EDUCATION:
B.A.Sc. University of British Columbia
Civil Engineering, 1987
Short Course Sewer Inventory Maintenance (SIMS) Implementors
Seminar, sponsored by the MOE and the Tri-Committee
EMPLOYMENT:
1987-
Present
Project Engineer
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
1986
1985
1984
Acres International Limited (summer term)
Acres International Limited (summer term)
SB Geological Associates (summer term)
AFFILIATIONS:
Member -Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario
PROFILE OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:
-Conceptual and detailed design of water treatment and storage facility employing
aeration and activated carbon adsorption units.
-Detailed design of watermain river crossing using horizontal directional drilling or
conventional open cut construction methodology.
-Design and material specification for a package water treatment facility employing
floculation and filtration.
-Conceptual design and preparation of Class Environmental Assessments for water
and sewage projects in Kincardine, Belleville, Brownsville, and Embro.
I
-Design of 3,000 Litre/minute groundwater pumping facility incorporating wet well
storage and high lift turbine pumps for the Village of Dorchester. Project involved
extensive environmental impact assessment under the Class EA Process for projects
of this nature.
Mark C. Guthrie
Distribution system analysis, including extended period simulation, of Dorchester's
water system using KYPIPE.
-Design and implementation of a Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition
(SCADA) System for the Village of Dorchester.
-Conceptual and detailed design of communal well pumping stations in lnnerkip and
Point Clark, including pipe layout, pressure tank sizing, and material specifications.
Final Design and Contract Administration for a multi-stage road reconstruction
including the replacement of sanitary, storm and watermain in downtown
Cambridge (Preston).
-Conceptual design for the replacement and realignment of trunk sewers and
watermain through downtown Cambridge (Hespeler).
Final design and layout of process piping using AutoCAD for the City of Sarnia
sanitary landfill leachate treatment facility.
Evaluation and undertaking of a flow monitoring program to isolate and quantify the
degree of inflow and infiltration upon the sanitary sewer system in Wellesley.
-Design of urban stormwater management facilities for a 60 hectare subdivision in
Waterloo, and smaller commercial sites using the computer software MIDUSS and
HYMO.
-Supervision of sewer and watermain construction for a 54 lot subdivision in
Stratford.
-Development of an AutoCAD interface to the Total Station surveying equipment to
automate the inclusion of detail information on base drawings.
Engineering surveying using a Geodimeter 420 Total Station for construction layout,
topographic mapping, and detail pick up of existing features.
Structural analysis and design of 25 tonne capacity crane griders and columns under
numerous loading conditions with the aid of mainframe computer simulation and
spreadsheet analysis.
-Stability investigation of a hydro-electric facility in New Brunswick, including
applied soil mechanics, and earthquake simulation.
-Geological mapping of subterranean formations for the purpose of petroleum
exploration.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
I
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IANV. MCRAE
EDUCATION:
1985 Certificate of Completion, Corrosion Prevention and Control,
Carboline Company, St. Louis, Missouri.
1980
1977
1975
Certificate of Completion, Construction Specification Writing, ATB
Courses Inc., Toronto, Ontario.
Certificate of Completion, Maintenance and Marine Coatings
Technology, Mobil Chemical, Toronto, Ontario.
Certificate of Completion, Architectural Hardware Institute, University
of Chicago '
1971 Civil Engineering, 3rd Year, University of New Brunswick
EMPLOYMENT:
1991-
Present
1986-91
1985-86
1984-85
1979-84
1974-79
1974
1972-74
Contracts Manager
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Senior Contract/Specification Engineer
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Specifications Specialist
Husky Oil Operations Ltd., Calgary, Alberta
Contract Formation Specialist
TransAlta Utilities Corporation, Calgary, Alberta
Contract Administrator
Monenco Consultants Limited, Calgary, Alberta
Senior Specification Writer .
New Brunswick Electric Power Commission, Fredericton, New Brunswick
Civil Technician
Neil and Gunter Ltd., Fredericton, New Brunswick
Surveyor /Estimator
Desourdy Construction Ltd., Montreal, Quebec
m
Ian V. McRae I
1971-72 Technical Assistant
Lalonde, Valois, Lamarre, Valois and Associates, Montreal, Quebec
AFFILIATIONS:
Member of American Society for Testing and Materials
Member of Steel Structures Painting Council
Member of American Water Works Association
PROFILE OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:
• Corporate responsibility for conducting all procurement-related activities for
construction projects.
• Corporate responsibility for managing and directing the preparation of all project
specifications and procurement documents.
• Corporate responsibility for ensuring compliance with contract administration
and specification writing procedures.
Areas of experience with reference to particular projects:
-Negotiated contracts with contractors and owners
-Developed model specifications, engineering practices, specification writing
practice, st~ndards for use in engineering, procurement and construction
-Evaluated corrosion protection options for structural steel in a petro-chemical
environment
-Conducted pre-id conferences and site visits
-Reviewed and monitored activities of engineering contractors for conformity
with established standards and policies
-Formulated contract strategy and developed contractual-legal and
contractual-technical language for construction projects including hazardous
waste remediation projects, power generating stations, waste treatment and
processing facilities, mining
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ian V. McRae
Executed requests for proposals and consulting agreements for
environmental and engineering studies including coordination of input
from environmental, engineering, legal and government agencies
Developed and maintained contractor qualification files
Supervised preparation of bid and contract construction documents including
specifications for nuclear, thermal and hydro generating plants, mining and
airport facilities and equipment and hazardous waste remediation projects
Performed contract and purchase order• administration including bidding, bid
analysis and evaluation and contract award for public and private sector
clients
Supervised on-site construction contracts for construction of thermal
generating stations
Developed company-wide specification 'system including policies and
standards and instructed engineering departments on methods of
specification writing ·
Designed tank farm protective coating system and supervised application
Performed site surveying, estimating and inspection for highway and bridge
construction and municipal work
3
I
a
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MICHAEL G. MATEYK. P.Geol.
EDUCATION:
1973 B.Sc., Geological Sciences, Brock University
1977-78 Graduate Courses in Hydrogeology
University of Alberta
June 1982 Short Course -Contaminant Hydrogeology
University of Waterloo
Nov. 1990 Short Course -Dense Immiscible Phase Liquid
Contaminants in Porous and Fractured Media
Waterloo Centre for Groundwater Research
EMPLOYMENT:
1991-
Present
1985-91
1983-85
1977-83
1976-77
1974-76
1973-74
Associate and Manager of Hydrogeology
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Senior Hydrogeologist
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
President and Senior Hydrogeologist
MLM Ground-Water Services Ltd.
Project Hydrogeologist and Principal
MLM Ground-Water Engineering
Project Hydrogeologist
EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd.
Hydrogeologist
James F. Maclaren Ltd.
H ydrogeologis t
Water Quantity Division
Ministry of the Environment, Ontario
AFFILIATIONS:
Association of Ground-Water Scientists and Engineers
Registered Professional Geologist
Michael G. Mateyk
Association of Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta
Member, Board of Directors
Waterloo Centre for Groundwater Research
PROFILE OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:
Mr. Mateyk has 20 years of practical experience covering a broad range of
hydrogeological issues and investigations throughout Canada and the United States.
This experience includes project management, contaminant transport evaluation,
Superfund investigations; solid waste site evaluations and groundwater resource
development. The following presents some of Mr. Mateyk's experience:
• Corporate responsibility for the quality assurance of hydrogeologic work
performed by the company.
• Project Management
Mr. Mateyk is the project manger for several projects. Duties include direction of
the Project Team, client and regulatory liaison and cost control. Representative
projects which Mr. Mateyk manages are listed below:
-Carolawn Site, Fort Lawn South Carolina (NPL Site)
-Cedartown Municipal Landfill Site, Cedartown, Georgia (NPL Site)
-Dartco Manufacturing Site, Neshanic Station, New Jersey (ECRA Site)
-former Dart Industries Site, North Smithfield, Rhode Island (State Listed
Site).
• Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies
Mr. Mateyk has been responsible for the hydrogeologic component of several
RI/FS and RFI/CMS under Superfund and RCRA programs. In addition,
Mr. Mateyk has conducted investigations on State lists including ECRA. The
duties included the scoping of the activities, design of hydrogeologic
2
w
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Michael G. Mateyk
investigations, interpretation of hydrogeologic and chemistry data,
determination of fate and transport, the d_esign and evaluation of remedial
alternatives and agency negotiations. Representative projects are listed below:
-North Hollywood Dump Site, Memphis, Tennessee (NPL Site)
-Hardeman County Landfill Site, Hardemen County, Tennessee (NPL Site)
-Mallory Capacitor Site, Waynesboro, Tennessee (NPL Site)
-Yellow Water Road Site, Baldwin, Florida (NPL Site)
-Jadco-Hughes Site, Gastonia, North Carolina (NPL Site)
-FMC Plant Site, Middleport, New York (State Site)
-Vac Air Site, Frewsburg, New York (State Site)
-Cedartown Municipal Landfill Site, Cedartown, Georgia (NPL Site)
-Kent Dump Site, Kent, Ohio (removal action)
• Remedial Design/ Remedial Actions
Mr. Mateyk works with other professionals at CRA to design and implement
groundwater remedial actions at Superfund, industrial sites and abandoned
waste disposal sites. The duties involve the design of pre-design investigations
required to determine the hydrogeological conditions, evaluation of aquifer
testing data, evaluation of numerical models, preparation of design and
specifications for extraction wells, and the development of long-term monitoring
plans. Some representative projects of this type are listed below:
-Uniroyal Chemical Plant Site, Elmira, Ontario
-Lees Avenue Transitway, Ottawa, Ontario
-Algoma Steel, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
-Spiegelburg Site, Livingstone County, Michigan (NPL Site)
-Summit National Landfill Site, Portage County, Ohio (NPL Site)
-Miami County Incinerator Site, Miami County, Ohio (NPL Site)
3
Michael G. Mateyk
• Solid Waste Management Sites
Mr. Mateyk has extensive experience in the hydrogeologic aspects of solid waste
management sites. This work has included preparation of constraint maps for
initial screening of candidate sites, the design of detailed hydrogeological
investigations, the preparation of boundary impact assessments, the
development of contingency plans and long-term monitoring. These activities
have been conducted for closed landfills and in support of interim and long-term
expansion of existing landfills. Selected project experience in this area is:
-Waterloo Landfill Site, Waterloo, Ontario (Long-Term Expansion)
-Sarnia Landfill Site, Sarnia, Ontario (Interim Expansion and Long-Term
Monitoring)
-Keele Valley Landfill Site, Vaughan, Ontario (Interim Expansion)
-Green Lane Landfill Site, St. Thomas, Ontario (Interim Expansion)
-Aurora Landfill Site, Aurora, Ontario (Long-term Monitoring and Closure
Plan)
• Groundwater Resource Development
Mr. Mateyk has been involved in numerous groundwater resource development
projects for municipalities, industries and subdivisions throughout Canada.
This work has included regional water resource evaluations based on limited
data. The duties included: aquifer and flow system delineation, water quality
evaluation, design of test drilling programs, aquifer testing and production well
design and rehabilitation. Some representative groundwater resource
development projects are listed:
-Beaver River-Cold Lake Water Resources Study, Alberta
-Gregg River Resources, Hinton, Alberta (4000 m3 / day supply)
-Village of Earlton, Ontario
-Nitnat River Fish Hatchery, Kemano, British Columbia
4
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
I
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Michael G. Mateyk
• Environmental Impact Assessments
Mr. Mateyk has been actively involved in the determination of potential
environmental impacts of resource developments on the groundwater regime.
The tasks performed are baseline investigations, identification of potential
impacts, establishment of severity criteria and recommendations of mitigative
measures. Typical projects are listed below:
-Kemano Completion Hydroelectric Project, British Columbia
-Gravel extraction below the water table, Villeneuve Gravel Extraction Area,
Villeneuve, Alberta
-assessment of open pit mining on the water balance of Mary Gregg Lake,
Hinton, Alberta
• Dewatering and Drainage
Mr. Mateyk has extensive experience in dewatering at construction sites and
open pit mines. This work included field testing, data evaluation, design and
installation of dewatering systems. Some projects are listed below:
-Assessment of dewatering requirements, proposed underground portion of
Coal Valley Mine, Coal Valley, Alberta ·
-Dewatering requirements of three active open pits at Cardinal River Coal
Mine, Hinton, Alberta.
• Expert Witness
Mr. Mateyk has experience in providing expert testimony for the purposes of
litigation and environmental assessment hearings pertaining to solid waste
management sites. Some projects are listed. below:
-Mountain Road Landfill Site, Niagara Falls, Ontario. (Testified before the
Environmental Assessment Board).
-Sarnia Landfill Site, Sarnia, Ontario (Testified before the Environmental
Assessment Board).
-Greenlane Landfill Site, St. Thomas, Ontario (expert witness for
hydrogeology).
5
Michael G. Mateyk
-Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carlton vs. Consumers Gas (expert witness
for hydrogeology).
PUBLICATIONS:
• Mateyk, M. G. and C. J. MacGillivray (1977):
"Investigating Groundwater Pollution from a Brine Pond"
preprinted for the Third National Groundwater Quality Symposium
• Hall, P. L. and M. G. Mateyk (1977):
"Controlling Sea Water Intrusion by Pumping Salt Water"
Water and Sewage Works, June 1977
• McBean, E. A., K. Schmidtke, M. Mateyk and F. Rovers (1990):
"Determining Aquifer Characteristics from Tidal Fluctuation Data"
paper presented at International Conference on Groundwater Resources
Management, Bangkok, Thailand, November 1990
6
D
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STEVEN DAY
EDUCATION:
1980 BA Chemistry and Microbiology
Miami University, Oxford, Ohio
EMPLOYMENT:
1990 -
Present
Environmental Chemist
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
1989-90 Chemistry Laboratory Manager:
National Sanitation Foundation
1985-1989 Laboratory Manager ,
Environmental Testing and Certification Corporation
1984-1985 Environmental Chemist
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
1983-1984 Manager Field Technical Services
O.H. Materials Corporation
1982-1983 Project Chemist
O.H. Materials Corporation
1981-1982 Chernis t
O.H. Materials Corporation
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
American Chemical Society
Association of Official Analytical Chemists
PROFILE OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES:
• Manager of Field Technical Services responsible for the analysis, handling and
consolidation of containerized hazardous waste at the Chern-Dyne Site in
Steven Day
Hamilton, Ohio. In addition, was approved by the U.S. Army Corps. of
Engineers to perform the segregation, classification/identification, repacking and
manifesting of the lab-pack chemicals at Chem-Dyne
• Project Chemist responsible for field sampling and consolidation monitoring of
containerized hazardous waste at the Piccillo Pig Farm in Coventry, Rhode
Island
• Project Chemist responsible for the segregation, classification/identification,
repacking and manifesting of lab-pack chemicals at the Piccillo Pig Farm in
Coventry, Rhode Island
• Field Chemist responsible for field sampling and analysis of containerized
hazardous waste at the Dryfuss Street Uncontrolled Waste Site in Columbia,
South Carolina
• Field Chemist responsible for the segregation, classification/identification,
repacking of lab-pack chemicals at the Dryfuss Street Uncontrolled Waste Site in
Columbia, South Carolina
• Manager of Field Technical Services responsible for numerous drum handling,
sampling, analysis, consolidation and disposal projects. Supervised and trained
field chemists in all aspects of drum handling procedures, field testing and
monitoring of containerized waste, compatibility testing, laboratory test bulking,
field consolidation monitoring, labelling and manifesting and lab-pack chemical
handling procedures
• Participated in numerous small unknown drum removal projects in both
analyst and field chemist capacities. In addition, performed field identification,
segregation and handling of explosive and shock-sensitive chemicals at
numerous sites and laboratories
• Analytical data assessment and liaison with project laboratories in support of
various remedial projects
• Development of laboratory quality assurance project plans (QAPP)
• Responsibility for the management of an independent testing laboratory
performing analyses in support of public health concerns
• Responsibility for the management of an environmental testing laboratory
performing analyses in support of groundwater assessments, tank
2
I
DI
D I
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
0
D
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Steven Day
closures/removals, soil assessments, excavations and containerized waste
removal/ disposal
• Performance of applied research into the use of pozzolonic materials in the
stabilization of liquid hazardous wastes
• Evaluation of the applications of new and existing technologies in hazardous
waste treatment
• Responsibility for the management of field technical activities including
sampling, analyses, monitoring well installations and water treatment system
operation
• Responsibility for the supervision of a high-hazard laboratory performing
sample preparation of dioxin samples from Times Beach, Missouri
• Development of sampling and analysis plans for numerous Superfund and
private-sector projects
• On-site chemist for numerous Superfund and private-sector projects performing
sampling and analyses, overseeing cleanup/treatment of spilled hazardous
materials and operating water treatment systems
• Laboratory chemist performing organic and inorganic analyses with a variety of
analytical instrumentation and classical wet-chemical techniques on
environmental samples
3
I
I
I
I
D
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MITCHELL S. BERGNER. MS. CIH, ROH
EDUCATION:
BA Jersey City State College, Biology-Chemistry, 1973
MS Rutgers University, Environmental Health, 1975
EMPLOYMENT:
1990-
Present
1988-90
1983-88
1981-83
1977-81
1975-77
Industrial Hygiene Manager
Conestoga-Rovers & Associates
Manager of Human Resources:Jnformation Systems
Honeywell Defense System Group, Minnesota
Manager of Occupational Health Services
Honeywell Defense System Group, Minnesota
Principal Industrial Hygienist
Honeywell Defense System Group, Minnesota
Senior Staff Industrial Hygienist
US Department of labor -OSHA, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania
Environmental Manager
Piscataway Township, New Jersey
AFFILIATIONS:
American Industrial Hygiene Association
Computer Application Committee
Respiratory Protection Committee
Hazardous Waste Committee
American Academy of Industrial Hygiene
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
American Society of Safety Engineers
Canadian Board of Occupational Hygienists
Mitchell Bergner
CERTIFICATIONS:
American Board of Industrial Hygiene, Certified Industrial Hygienist
Canadian Board of Occupational Hygienists, Registered Occupational Hygienist
Asbestos Abatement, Supervisor License
PROFILE OF PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
• Implemented and directed the work activity of ·occupational health nurses,
industrial hygienists and consulting physicians to provide full service
occupational health programs to 6000 employees.
• Designed computer systems for industrial hygiene and safety operations in the
areas of Worker Right to Know, chemical labeling, training and hazardous waste
management.
• Designed policies and procedures for Industrial Hygiene and Radiological Health
programs.
• Developed and managed medical monitoring programs for persons exposed to
radiological hazards. Interfaced with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
• Designed and managed lead abatement programs for industry.
• Implemented toxicological and medical evaluations for a variety of workplace
communities.
• Conducted over 300 on-site investigations and consultations for multi-national
and small businesses regarding a wide variety of safety and health problems and
concerns.
• Prepared technical reports and participated in litigation by providing expert
testimony in court proceedings. ·
• Designed response protocol for hazardous materials spiils and waterway
contamination emergencies. Conducted air pollution investigations.
• Conducted public health investigations of food service, housing and health care
facilities.
2
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
I
I
I
Mitchell Bergner
• Conducted fatality investigations.
• Managed Industrial Hygiene aspects of Hazardous Waste Site Remediation on
superfund sites interfacing with EPA and OSHA.
• Managed Health and Safety issues regarding removal and disposal of asbestos
contaminated buildings and structures over a 150 acre Site. (Manville Corp.)
1990/1991.
• Provided industrial hygiene and safety technical support for the excavation and
removal of NPL sites.
• Prepared and reviewed numerous Site Safety Plans for submission to EPA and
for use on Sites during remediation activities.
• Managed PCB and asbestos abatement activities in a 2.5 million square foot
facility (1993).
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIXD
I
CURRICULA VITAE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3(,69 (18)
R
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TYPICAL CONTRACTORS DAILY LOG BOOK
Project Name: Rmmial Action Date:
]adco-HughcsSite
Weather: Report No.~------
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
3669 08)
Personnel On Site
a) CRA
b) Contractor
c) Subcontractor
d) Other
Phases of Construction in Progress (Give briefly only phase or phases of work in progress)
Health and Safety
a) Preparatory
b) Initial
c) Follow-up
Material and/or Equipment on Site (Including equipment demobilization)
Inspection Made (Include negative inspections, phase of in-progress construction work inspected
and all deficiencies noted during inspections)
Tests Performed and Results of Tests (including results of tests taken on previous dates).
7)
8)
9)
Instructions Received (List any instructions given by Resident Engineer on construction
deficiencies, retesting required etc., with action to be taken).
Changed Conditions/Conflicts Encountered.
Remarks
S!GNA1URE~------------------
TIIlE _____________________ _
Contractor's Verification: The above report is complete and correct and all material and equipment
used and work performed during this reporting period are in compliance with the construction plans and
specifications except as noted above.
Contractor's Approved Authorized Representative
3669 (18)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
D
I
I
I
I
I ATTACHMENT C-1
I
TYPICAL CONTRACTORS
I DAILY LOG BOOK
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
I
g
I
0
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
Inspection Log Books, Problem/Corrective Action reports, deviations from
design and material specifications (with justifying documentation), and
as-built drawings.
C.7.8 STORAGE OF RECORDS
During remedial construction, the Resident Engineer will
maintain a copy of the Construction Drawings and the Construction
Specifications, CQAP and Problem/Corrective Action reports in the Site
office. Once the construction is complete, all CQA documents (originals) will
be retained by CRA. This information will be retained for the period specified
in the Order.
C-19 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
Items above may be formulated into checklists so that
details are not overlooked.
C.7.5 PROBLEM/CORRECTNE ACTION REPORTS
A problem is define,d as material or workmanship that
does not meet the construction specific~tions. Problem/Corrective Action
Reports should be cross-referenced to specific inspection entries in the
Inspection Log Book where the problem was identified. Problem/Corrective
Action Reports will include the following information:
i) unique identifying sheet number for cross-referencing and document
control;
ii) detailed description of the problem;
iii) location of the problem;
iv) probable cause;
v) how and when the problem was located (reference to Inspection Log
Book); '
vi) estimation of how long problem has existed;
vii) suggested corrective action;
viii) documentation of correction (reference to Inspection Log Book);
ix) final results;
x) suggested methods to prevent similar problems; and
xi) signature of the appropriate CQA Support Personnel and concurrence
by the Resident Engineer.
In some cases, not all of the above information will be
available or obtainable. However, when available, such efforts to document
problems could help to avoid similar problems in the future.
C-17 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
C.7.6 WORK TASK REPORTS
Within each work task, there may be several quality
characteristics, or parameters, that are specified to be observed or tested, each
by a different observation or test, with the observations and/ or tests recorded
in different Inspection Log Books. At the completion of each task, these log
books should be used to write a Work Task Report summarizing all of the
construction activities related to that particular work task.
Work Task Reports will be prepared by the Resident
Engineer or the Project Coordinator and will include the following
information:
i) unique identifying sheet number for cross-referencing and document
control;
ii) description of work task (i.e. installation of underground pipeline);
iii) quality characteristic being evaluated and references to construction
specifications and plans;
iv)
v)
vi)
quality control test locations;
inspections made (define procedure by name or other identifier);
summary of inspection results, which will include all data outside
acceptable limits, and documentation of corrective action and retest
results;
vii) define acceptance criteria (compare task inspection data with design
specification requirements; indicate compliance or noncompliance; in
the event of noncompliance, identify documentation that gives
reasons for acceptance outside of the specified design); and
viii) signature of the Resident Engineer, Project Engineer or Project
Coordinator.
C.7.7 REMEDIAL ACTION {RA) REPORT
At the completion of the remedial construction and after
completion of construction inspection, CRA will submit an RA Report to
USEPA. This report will include copies of all of the Daily Log Books,
C-18 CONESTOGA ·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
0
fl
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C7.0 COA DOCUMENTATION
3669 (18)
C.7.1 GENERAL
This section details the documentation requirements for
the CQAP. The proper, thorough, and accurate documentation of all CQA
activities is important in ensuring quality installation. CQA testing will be
documented daily.
C.7.2 CONTRACTORS DAILY LOG BOOK
The selected contractor(s) will record daily quality control
activities in a Daily Log Book to be kept on Site. The log book will state the
name of the person preparing the log and include the following information:
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
x)
xi)
xii)
xiii)
xiv)
xv)
xvi)
xvii)
date, weather conditions;
all activities completed;
decisions made regarding approval of units of material or of work,
and/ or corrective actions to be taken in cases of s.ubstandard quality;
submittals made by suppliers verifying material quality;
quality control test and inspection results;
construction delays, and causes;
areas affected by delays;
construction problems and corrective actions;
personnel on Site;
present phase of construction;
material and/or equipment delivered (including equipment
demobilization);
inspections made;
health and safety considerations;
quality control tests performed and results of tests taken on previous
work day;
instructions given by the Resident Engineer;
changed conditions/ conflicts encountered; and
remarks.
C-15 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
Each daily entry into the log will be signed by the
contractor(s) as verification to its correctness, and a copy of the signed entry
will be provided to the Resident Engineer on a daily basis for verification. An
example of this report sheet is presented in Attachment C-l. The contractor(s)
may use alternate forms providing the same information, subject to the
approval of the Resident Engineer.
C.7.3 COA INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION
The CQA support personnel will record calibr_ations of test
equipment in an Instrument Calibration Log Book, maintained on Site by the I Resident_ Engineer. Actions taken as a result of recalibration will be recorded
in the Inspection Log Book, as described in the next section.
C.7.4 INSPECTION LOG BOOK
All observations and quality control field tests will be
recorded by the CQA support personnel into Inspection Log Books. These
books will be kept and maintained by the Resident Engineer. The inspection
log book will include the following information:
i) date, time, weather conditions;
ii) description or title of the inspection activity;
iii) location of the inspection activity or location from which the sample
increment was obtained;
iv) type of inspection activity and procedure used (reference to standard
method when appropriate);
v) recorded observation or test data, with all necessary calculations;
vi) results of the inspection activity and comparison with specification
requirements;
vii) personnel involved in the inspection activity; and
viii) signature of the appropriate CQA inspection personnel and
concurrence by the Resident Engineer.
C-16 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSCX:IA TES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A. Rw:ki' Pt,,IRHI
Pipeline High Dau.ity
Polyethylene Pipe (HOPE;) or
or Polyvinyl Chloride (PYO
Common B.,,cldill and
Imported To~il
B. M«irkn«n« llaln
Pipe, Vdves, Fittings,
ConnectioN, etc.
• Precast Concnte Ch.amben
c. &tr..ctian Ta:,Kb
• Gn.nuln B.tcldill
• Commcn Ba.cldill
D. [rtmctian Well,
• Cuing
;;a a.a ;;;;a ;;a liiia
T-yro/Tnt
• Hydromtic
• F1uahing
TABLEC.6...2
SUMMAJlY Of CONSlllUCTION QUAUTI ASSURANCE TESTING
RA WORK PLAN
JADCO HUGHES Sm:, GASTON COUNn', NORIB CAROLINA
Ttt1"11g Stlnultrnl
• NA
• NA
Frripnuy of Tut
each test shill not uettd
1,500 fttt of piping urtleu
otherwi.\e authorized by Resident
Engineer
each test ah.I.II not exceed
1,500 feet of piping unleas
otherwise authorized by Resident
Engineer
• Maximum Dry Density • ASn.<0698 minimwn of I test for each change
inm11hiri.l
• Gr.1.di.tion
Moisture Content
Bulk Density
• Leakage
• Hydrostatic
• Leak.age
• D,yO..Uity
• See Section A. Buried Pipeline
• Leabge
ASTM Dl22 or ASThf D1140
n approprilte
A5IM 02216
ASTM 0698, ASTM D15.56, A5TM
02167 or ASIM 02922,
whichevc-r i, appropri•te
• NA
• NA
• NA
ASTh< 0698
• NA
minimum of I test per SJXX) C\I. yd.
of m.1terill removed 1.t MJurc-e
minimum of 1 test for any CNnge
in matffUI used in fill
minimum l test per 2,00J ni. yd.
minimum l Int per 2,00J ni. yd.
after installation and after
repairs
after installation and 1fter
repair,
after irutalbtion ind 1fter any
repairs
• minimum l test per 2,00J cu. yd.
• for eu::h hole drilled
1.mount of m11U-up w1.ter 1.dded thou Id not
eio:ce-ed 0.25 gallons per 100' of pipe 1.1 let
pr-e,5ure of 100 psi
• flwh until di foreign m11terial i, removed
• N.A.
>25, wt < 0.005 mm• P-"rtide ,iu;
:65, wt pusing No. 200 sif'\o'e
minimum fluctuation of 5 p,i at 140 psi
1pplied pre.sure, over 1 hour
minimum fluctuation of 5 psi at 140 psi
1.pplled pressure, over 1 hour
• leakage g).3, vol/hr
minimum 90-95, Standard Proctor Density
to bottom of uUting ditch
• no le.1kage for five minutn
iiiil
TABLEC.6.2
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTING
RA WORK PLAN
JAOCO HUGHES SITE. CASTON COUNTY, NORTif CAROLINA
Work T•d: C""'poflfflt
tolKTnW
r. BHil4inr:CmtrcbniorU5oil,
• Engineered Flll/Grnel Bue
• Lo.amSoil
r. Qwifdi"t • Coaart, ~York
c. BYildint·MuonQI Wallt
II. Qyi/Jinr·Mccb,iniod
Tinks, Pipes, Valves, Fittings,
Connections, etc.
I. 8Hildinr·Occtrinl
Notes:
Typ1to/Tnt
mu:imum dry dmsity
bulk density
• gradation
See Engineered Fill/Gravel Base
Permeability
• compressive strength (")("')
tot;al air content (0)(00)
temperature of mncrete s.1mp!e
(")("")
• compressive strength
leakage
Hydrostatic
calibration
wiring mntinuity
PLC programming/control
circuit5 loop checks
motors bumped to check
operation and rotation
ASTM D698 and ASlM 02216
ASTM D1556orA5TMD2167or
ASTM D2922 whichever is
appropriate
A5TM Dl,22 or ASI'M D1140
whichever is appropriate
ASTM D2434
• ASTM C39
• ASTMCI43
ASTM C173 or ASTM C2Jl
ASTM CHJ6-1
• ASTMC90,Cl29,Cl45,C55
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
If more than one {I) batching pl.Int is being used, these frequencies shall apply lo each batching pl.ant separately
Fr1ttpmu:yofT1td
minimum I test for e.ich change in
m.tteTi.al
minimum of I test per S<XJcu. yd.
minimum of I test per 5.000 cu. yd.
of nuterial removed at source
minimum of I test for any change
in material used in fill
minimum 1 test pcr 2,000 cu. yd.
minimum 1 test for any m.tlerial
change
l compressive strength tel per
concrete truck lo.id
2 speciml'ns for 7 .and 28 day~
(compressive strength)
at beginning, middle, and end of .a
p.lr1icuUr concrctl' truck lo.id
whenever concrete consistency
varil."!',
one for every strength te.t
I for every slump te..t
one for every strength te,;t or .is
required
mini,.;,~m of I test p<"r truck Jo.id
after inst.albtio~ ind dter any
reP3irs
.ifter instalbtion .ind .after any
rep.iirs
before installation
after inst.ilbtion
.after inst.albtion
before iruitallation
Type of test and its frequency 1h.all be coruiidered minimums and sha.U be .added to or increased as determined necessary by the Contractor
l. A5lM • Americ;m Society for Testing and Materials
2. AO American Concrete Institute
NA Not Applicable
Cribri11
NA
minimum 95% Standard Proctor Density
>2S'J. wt <0.005 mm e particle size;
>55% wt passing No. 200sieve
• l,o;I0-4cm/5
• 3500 psi .it 28 d.iys unless s!Jted otherwis-e
to be determined fromConcrcte Mi•
specifk.itions
to b._. determined fromCono-cte Mi•
specifications
40"F <l',;,mper;ature <77"F
• to be determined from design specifications
minimum Ouctu;ation of 5 psi at 100 psi
.ipplied pres.sure, over 2 hour.,;
minimum Ouctu.ition of 5 psi at 140 psi
applied pre.sure, over 1 hour
as specified
as specified
JS specified
;IS specified
iiii iiiii liiii iiiii liiiil iiiiiil --iiii iiii
P;age 2 of 2
-- -
Work TIWC Conspono,t
to bt' 1-,,ectr.d
-
B. hut:htmial Co,,rpu,ients
-
Installation of Valves. Pumps,
Pipe and Fittings. Aow meters,.
flow Control Valves,etc.
C. Eltttriail Compm,enb
Pull Boxes
PVC Electrical and Control
Conduits
D. Piping and Esp,dpment to Jn{iJtn,lian
~ (F11:n1~ Dpurticm)
• Piping and F.quipment
- ---!!!!!!!! 11!!!9 ==
TABLE<:.6..1
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTIONS
RA WORK PLAN
JAOCO HUGHES SITE, CASTON COUNTY, NC
• do specifications of mechanical
components meet design specifications
• are mechanical components being
assembled according to specifications
• do pull bolles meet design specifications
• do conduits meet specifications
• do piping ,1nd equipment meet specification
• check 5Upplier's specifications
• visual
• visual
• check supplier's specifications
• check manufacturer's specification
FrrlfNDC0f of bupec:tfcm
• upon delivery to Site
• periodically during assembly
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site or upon
assembly
==
Swl,.,.ltt,ds to
RnilUftt Engf,ua
• manufacturer's operating and
mainlenance literature
• shop drawings
P•ge9of9
• confirmation in wriling !hat equipmenl
was !1,.1,tisfactorily lesled
• none
• manufacturer'scertication
manufacturer's certification
llii
3669 (18)
C.6.3 TESTING
In addition to the daily inspections of the construction
progress, material testing will be carried out as required. Material testing will
be performed to ensure compliance with material specifications and design
criteria as presented in the Construction Specifications.
The testing requirements, methods of testing, testing
frequency for each of these work task components and submittals (test reports,
certificates, verifying material quality /workmanship, etc.) are summarized in
Table C.6.2 and have been incorporated into the construction specifications
for the groundwater treatment system. This table may be modified upon
completion and approval of the Final Design.
C-14 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
u
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---
Painting
Process Equipment
• Piping ~d Equipment
Electrical
Electrical Requirements
IV 5Yf Sy1km
• Depth
. Cemmt
Aggregate
Wat.er
Admixtures
Concrete
Grout
Well Screens
D.sings
Silica Sand
Sampling
I!!!!!!! I!!!!!! == == ==
TABLE C..C..1
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE INSP'ECTJONS
RA WORK PLAN
JADCO HUCHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
Ito,u to be Ch«k.«I
Dwmgha~
specificalioM
• does all work meet specifications
• do all proce-,,s equipment meet specifications
• do piping and equipment meet specification
• does all electrical work meet specifications
• does all work required meet specifications
• does trench depth mttt design
specifications
• does cement meet specifications
• does awegate meet specifications
• does water meet specifications
• does admixture meet specifications
• does concrete meet design specifications
• does concrete mixture meet design specifications
• see Section B
• do well screens meet specification
• do casing, meet specifications
• does gradation meet specifications
• See Remediation Goal Verification Plan
• check specifications
• check manufacturer'ssp«ification
• check manufa.cturer's sp«ificatiorui
• check specifications
• check specifications
• visual logging ol excavated ,oils
• depth measurement
- • check supplier's specifications
• check supplier's specifications
• check supplier's specificatioru
• check supplier's specificatioru
• visual (tape measurement)
• check supplier's specification
• check manufacturer's sp«ificalions
• check manufacturer's sp«ificatioru
• check supplier's specifications
manufacture's supervision
• following the completion of work
• upon delivery to Site or upon
iMtallation
• upon delivery to Site or upon
assembly
• upon installation
• during work
• periodic
• periodic and on completion
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• during concrete placement
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
SJWMltt11l1 to
RrsilUftt £1tghtffr
• none
• shop drawings
• manufacturer's certification
• certific.i.tion
• certific.i.tion
• exc.i.vation log
• excavation log
• certification·-
• certific.i.tion
• certification
• certification
• final dimell5ions
• mixture certification
• certification
• certification
• certification
lliii liiiii
Page 7 of 9
-
Work Tui Compo,eent
to be Ins,,«ted
Installation of Valves. Pumps,
Pipe and Fittings. Aow meters,
Aow Conbol Valves,etc.
D. E~ctriail Componoil.s
Installation of Panelboards,
Electrical Cable, Control Wire,
Suspended Electrodes, Liquid
Level Switch, etc.
Pull Bo:,,;es
PVC Electrical and Control
Conduits
V. Satl flM&tng S;uatan
A. Soil F/ldhing Extniction Tmteks
• Depth
-
Cement
Aggregate
Water
Admbtures
Concrete
Grout
Well Screens
Casings
Silica Sand
- --
TABLE <:.6..1
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTIONS
RA WORK PLAN
JADCO HUGHES SITE, CASTON COUNTY, NC
It-• to be Chtcked
IJuri,,g hu,,«Hon
• do specifications of mechanical
components meet design specifications
• are mechanical components being
assembled according to specifications
• do specifications of electrical
components meet design specifications
• are electrical components being
assembled according to specifications
• do pull bo:,,;es meet design specifications
• do conduits meet specifications
• does e,;traction trench meet design
specifications
• does cement meet specifications
• doesaggregatemeetspecifications
• does water meet specifications
• does admi:,,;ture meet specifications
• does concrete meet design specifications
• does concrete mixture meet design specifications
• see Section B
• do well screens meet specification
• do casing:, meet specifications
• does gradation meet specifications
- --..
Type of lnspeetio,s
• check supplier·s specifications
• visual
• check supplier's specifications
• visual
• visual
• check supplier's specifications
• visual logging of excavated soils
• depth measurement
• check supplier's specifications
• check supplier's specifications
• check supplier's specifications
• check supplier's specifications
• visual (tape measurement)
• check supplier's specification
• check manufacturer's specifications
• check manufacturer's specifications
• check supplier's specifications
-liiil
• upon delivery to Site
• periodically during assembly
• upon delivery to Site
• periodically during assembly
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• periodic
• periodic and on completion
• upon delivery to Site
• upondeliverytoSite
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• during concrete placemen!
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
liiiiiii
Sub,,sittAls to
Re6ldent E11gi11ttr
• manufacturer's operating and
maintenance literature
• shop drawings
Page8of9
• confirmation in writing that equipment
• was satisfactorily tested
ii.i
• manufacturer's Certification
• shop drawings
• test results upon successful completion of
installation
• none
• manufacturer's certication
• e:,,;cavating log
• e:,,;cavating log
• certification
• certification
• certification
• certification
• final dimension,
• mixture certification
• certification
• certification
• certification
iiiii liiiiii
-- - - -- -------
Work TW COtfl,-U,St
to be ln.,,«tr:d
Precast Concrete Chambers and
Appum"nances
Mainteno1nce Hole Frames
Crout
Concrete
• Gravel Base
Granular Backfill for
Maintenance Hole Frames
C. £:drvdion Wtlls
• Depth
Cement
Aggregate
Water
Admixtures
Concrete
Grout
Well Screens
Casings
Silica Sand
Sampling
TABLEC..6.1
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTIONS
RA WORK PLAN
JADCO HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
It-.• to ff Checked
Otim.g ht1pection
• do maintenance hole frames and appurtenances
meet design specifications
• are maintenance holes in,talled to grade and
plumb
• does grout meet specifications
• does concrete meet design specifications
• does concrete mixture meet design specifications
• does gravel meet gradation
specilica tions
• does compacted gravel meet design
thickness
• does granular backfill meet gradation
specification
• does well depth meet design
spe~_ifi~ations
• does cement meet specifications
• does aggregate meet specifications
• does water meet specifications
• does admixture meet specifications
• does concrete meet design specifications
• does concrete mixture meet design specifications
• does grout meet specifications
• do well screens meet specification
• do casings meet specifications
• does gradation meet specifications
• See Remediation Goal Verification Plan
• check supplier's specifications
• survey
• check suppliers specification
• visual (tape measurement)
• check supplier's specification
• check supplier's gradation
• visual (grade stakes) or survey
• check gradation from supplier
• visual logging of well cuttings
• depth measurement
• check supplier's specifications
• check supplier's specifications
• check supplier's specifications
• check supplier's specifications
• visual (tape measurement)
• check supplier's specification
• check suppliers specification
• check manufacturer's specifications
• check manufacturer's specifications
• check supplier's specifications
Frrtfwost:y of bupectiOfl
• 14 days prior to delivery to Sile
• upon installation
• upon delivery to Site
• during concrete placement
• upon delivery to Site
• prior to delivery to Site
• upon completion
• prior to delivery to Site
• periodic
• periodic and on completion
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• during concrete placement
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Sile
S11-bnsitt11l1 to
Raidr,ct £ngbua
• manufacturer's certifico1tion
• final elevations
• certification
• final dimensions
• mixture certification
• grain size distribution curve
• measurements
• grain size distribution curve
• well drilling log
• well drilling log
• certification
• certifico1tion
• certification
• certification
• final dimensions
• mixture certification
• certification
• certification
• certification
• certification
Page5of9
-
Work T,uk Cc.m,po,,ent
to be ln•,ectrd
Items to be Checkrd
Dwing ln•p«tic,,t
TABLE C6.1
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTIONS
RA WORK PLAN
JADCO HUGHES SITE, GASTON COUNTY, NC
D. ~Nlniail Componnsts c,f Wdls 11,uJ Jhin~na Hold
Installation of Valves,. Pumps,
Pipe and Fittings, Aow meters,
Aow Control Valves,etc.
Installation of Panelboards,
Electrical Cable, Control Wire,
Suspended Electrodes, Liquid
Levrl Switch, etc.
Pull Boxes
PVC Electrical and Control
Conduits
III. Grnff!ldrv@ttt Trt@tni:At S,,,,tffll
A. Geolminial/Soi&
Foundation Excavation
Engineered fill/gravel base
B. Tmzbnenf Facility
• Cast-in-place Concrete
Unit Masonry
Metal Fabrications
5"<1 Decking
Aashing and Sheet Metal
Metal Doors and Frames
C11A ,.., 11•• Concrete Aoor Seal -- --
• do specifications of mechanical
components meet design specifications
• are mechanical components being
assembled according to specifications
• do specifications of electrical
components meet design specifications
• are electrical components being
assembled according to specifications
• do pull boxes meet design specifications
• do conduits meet specifications
• excavation specifications
• gravel gradation specifications
• gravel base specified
• compaction specifications
• does concrete meet design specifications
• does concrete mixture meet design specifications .
• do unit masonry meet specifications·
• do all metal fabrications meet specifications
• do steel decking meet specifications
• do flashings and steel metal meet
specifications
• do the doors and frames meet the specifications
• does the concrete floor seal meet manufacture's ----
• check supplier's specifications
• visual
• check supplier's specifications
• visual
• visual
• check supplier's specifications
• measurement of layout and depth
• check supplier's gradation
• visual (grade stakes or level)
• compaction
• visual (tape measurement)
• check supplier's specification
• check supplier's specifications
• check manufacturer's specifications
• check supplier's specifications
• check manufacturer's specifications
• check manufacturer's specifications
• check manufacturer's specifications - --
• upon delivery to Site
• periodically during assembly
• upon delivery to Site
• periodically during assembly
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon completion of excavation
• prior to delivery on site
• upon completion
• during compaction
• during concrete placement
• upon delivery to Sile
• periodic
• upon delivery to site
• upon delivery to site
• upon delivery and after
installation
• periodically during assembly
• during assembly with ---
Swl,.,.ittal, to
Rniru"flt Cnginttr
• manufacturer's operating and
maintenance literature
• shop drawings
Page6of9
• confirmation in writing that equipment
was satisfactorily tested
• manufacturer's Certification
• test results upon successful completion of
installation
• none
• manufacturer'scertification
• none
• grain size distribution curve
• none
• compaction results
• final dimensions
• mixture certification
• none
• certfication
• certfication
• shop drawings
• shop drawings
• none ----
Work Tuk Coml"'"fflt
to be l'llSp«teli
Crout
Concrete
• Gravel Base
--.. - ---TABLE c...6.1
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTIONS
RA WORK PLAN
JADCO HUGHES SITE, CASTON COUNTY, NC
ltewu to be Chttlc.eil °"""' ,,,_
does grout meet specifications
see Section C Extraction Wells,. Monitoring Wells
and Piezometen
• does gravel meet gradation specifications
• check supplier's specifications
• check supplier's gradation
• upon delivery to Site
• prior to delivery to Site
-
• does compact gravel meet design thickness
G. MLC}wmial Components of ~inlt:ruma: H~
• visual (grade stakes) or survey • upon completion
Installation of Valves, Pwnps,
Pipe and Fittings
H. Elutriall Compnmts
Installation of Panelboards,
Electric.iJ Cible, Control Wire,
Suspended Electrodes, Liquid
Level Switch, etc.
Pull boxes
PVC Electrical and Control
Conduits
II Croundw,1tcr Eduction Sntsm
A. Burr.ii Conduits 11"'1. PipdinLS
Depth and Alignment of
Ex.ca v.i tion
High Density Polyethylene
Pipe (HOPE) or Polyethylene
Pipe (PE)
Granular Bedding Material
• do specific;i.tions of mechanical components
meet design specifications
• are mechanial components being assembled
according to specifications
• do spedfiotions of electrical components meet
design specifications
• are electrical components being assembled
according to specifications
• do pull boxes mttt design specifications
• do conduits meet specifications
. • has trench been excavated to design
elevation and line
• do pipe and fittings meet
specifications
• has pipe bttn laid to design depth
• has pipe been damaged or filled
with soil during inslallation
• does beddinfS material meet gTadation
specifications
• does imported backfill meet
specifications
• check supplier's specifications
• visual
• check supplier's specifications
• visual
• visual
• check supplier's specifications
• survey
• check supplier's specifications
• survey
• visual
• check supplier's gTadation
• check supplier's specifications
• upon delivery to Site
• periodically during assembly
• upon delivery to Sile
• periodically during assembly
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• intermittent during excavation
• upon delivery to Site
• periodicaliy during excavation
• periodically during excavation
and at end of installation
• prior to delivery on Site
• for each source of material
prior to delivery to site
--
s ... bnsitti:ils to
lfrsi4"tt Crtgirtttr
• certification
• gTain size distribution curve
• measurements
• manufacturer's operating and
maintenance literahue
• shop drawings
-Page 3 of 9
• confirmation in writing that equipment
was satisfactorily tested
• manufacturer's Certifications
• test results upon successful compleltion of -
installation
• none
• manufacturer'scertification
• final elevations, gTade, and alignment
• manufacturer's certification
• elevations
• none
• gTain size distribution curves
• certification and test results
-
Work Tul COfflfO'UJ't
to be J,up«trd
• Native Fill
Storage and Handling of
Backfill
Excavation
== == ==
TABLE c.6.1
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTIONS
RA WORK PLAN
JADCO HUGHES SITE, CASTON COUNTY, NC
Items to br Ch«krd
I>url,tg bl,p«titm
• is stockpile being properly stored and
handled
• does ba.cldill meet gradation
specification
• does ba.cldill contain unsuitable
materials:
i) material containing loam, roots
or organic matter;
ii) clays which are classified as
inorganic days of high
plasticity;
iii) softand/ororganicdaysand
silts of low strength;
iv) swelling days;
v) rock and lumps of material with
dimensions greater than six inches
for ba.cldill of deep excavation
ueas or 1/2 inch for backfill of
the upper six inches of any
excavation area, measured through
any axis before compaction;
vi) tree, stumps, or any other wood or
lumber;
vii) wire, steel, cast iron, cans. drums or
any other foreign materials; and
viii) materials containing hazardous
or toxic constituents at hazardous
or toxic concentrations.
• does native fill contain unsuitable
materials:
i) rocks and lumps of material with
dimensions greater than specified
layer thid.:neiS before compaction; and
ii) other delrierious or foreign
matter detrimental lo the use intended.
• are stockpiles free of foreign
materials
• are stockpiles far enough apart to
prevent intermixing
• does excavation meet design
specifications
em !!!!9 ee
Typr of Msprcti°"
• visual
• if backfill is imported check
supplier's gradation
• if on-site backfill is used,
conduct gradation test
• visual and laboratory
• visual
• visual
• visual
• measure layout and depth
e!! I!!!!!!!
• periodic
• prior to delivery to site
• minimum of 1 test per S,CXXJ cu yd
of material removed at source
• minimum 1 test per 5,000 cu yd
of material removed at source.
• periodic
• upon delivery to Site
• upon delivery to Site
• upon completion
I!!!!!!
S1.1bmlttlds to
Resid.rnt Engt,,ur
• none
• grain size distribution curves
• gr~in size distribution curves
• certification and test results
• none
• none
• none
• elevations
ll!!!!!!I
ro1ge4of9
iiiii iiii
Work Ta.d: Compo,se,,t
to be I,upecttd
SvlllwSY CHIPat ed Pr:sbtarc lln<
A. SpiIIWlly ~tnu:iian
B. Tr,p Soil
-iiiij - -.. -TABLE C-6.1
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTIONS
RA WORK PLAN
JADCO HUGHES SITE, CASTON COUNTY, NC
Jtn,u to H Checked
!h,rl,,g ht,,,«fio,,
• is spillway con5tructed to design
elevations
• does backfill contain unsuitable materials
i) material containing excess loam,
roots or organic matter
ii) frozen material or material
containing snow or ice
iii) clays which are classified as
inorganic clays of high plasticity
in accordance with ASTM 0248'7
iv) softand/ororganicclaysand
silts of low strength
v) frost swiceptible silts or days
vi) swelling clays
vii) rock and lumps of material with
dimensions greater th.an 6 inches
for backfill of deep excavation
areas or 1 1/2 inches for backfill
of the upper 6 inches of any
excavation area, measured
throug~ any_ axis befo~ co'!lr.action
viii) tree5, stumps, branches, or any
ther wood or lumber
ix) wire, steel, cast iron. cans, drums
or any other foreign materials
• does imported top soil meet the
following specifications
i) be friable and loamy, non-swelling
compactible material
ii) be free of debris,. objectionable weeds and
stones
iii) contain no to;,dc substances that may be
harmful! to plant growth
iv) have pH in range 6.0 to 7.0
v) have a minimum organic matter content
of2.75 percent (organic matter content may
by raised by additives as approved by
Engineer)
• size distribution specification
• does fertilizer meet specification
• does grass seed meet specification
• does mulch meet specification
• does water meet specification
Ty~ of bup«tio,,
• survey
• visual
• check supplier's specifications
• check supplier's specification
• check specification
• check specification
• check specification
• visual
f1YIJUDU:y of bsspo:tio,c
• intermitten during spillway
construction
• intermittent during berm
construction
• for each source mateial prior
to delivery to site
• 14 days prior to delivery
• prior to delivery
• prior to delivery
• pr!or to delivery
• prior to delivery
- --
s,dm,ittals to
Resident £nri"err
-Page 1 of 9
• elevations before and after spillway
construction
• none
• certification and test results
• grain size distribution curves
• supplier's certification
• supplier's certification
• supplier's certification
• none
-
Work Ta,k Component
to be lnspected
D. Temporary SlockpikJ
E. Buritd Conduits 1md Pipeline,,
Depth and Alignment of
Excavation
High Density Polyethylene
Pipe (HDPE), Polyethylene
Pipe (PE) or Concrete Pipe
• Granular Bedding Material
• NatiVe Backfill
• Storage and Handling of Backfill
TABLEC.6.1
SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTIONS
RA WORK PLAN
JADCO HUGHES SITE,. GASTON COUNTY, NC
Item, to be Chtcktd
Th,rlng Inspection
• mixture rale
• grass height
• height
• slope
• does stockpile block natural drainage
• polyethylene underlay and
covering, if required
soil erosion and sediment control
has trench been excavated to design elevation
and line
do pipe and fittings meet specifications
has pipe been laid to design depth
has pipe been damaged or filled with soil during
installation
does bedding material meet gradation
specifications
does native fill contain unsuitable materials:
i) rocks and lumps of materials with
dimensions greater than specified layer
thickness before compaction; and
ii) other deleteriol.15 or foreigh matter
detrimental to the use intended
are stockpiles free of foreign materials
are stockpiles far enough apart to prevent
intermixing
Type of Inspection
• check specification
• visual
• measure
• measure
• visual
• visual
• visual
• survey
• check supplier's specifications
• survey
• visual
• check supplier's gradation
• visual
• visual
• visual
Frtqumcy of lnspt~tion
• continuous
• continuous
• intermittent, as required
• intermittent, as required
• intermittent, as required
• intermittent, as required
• intermittent, as required
• intermittent during excavation
• upon delivery to site
• periodically during excavation
• periodically during excavation
and at end of installation
• prior to delivery on Site
• periodic
• uJX!n delivery to Site
• UJX!n delivery to Site
F. M.aintenana Hoks (Pr=I Concret~ Chamber)
Excavation
Pree.a.st Concrete Chambers and
Appurtenances
Maintenance Hole Frames
;;a ==
does excavation ffil'i!t design specifications
do maintenance hole frames and appurtenances
meet design specifications
are maintenance holes installed to grade
and plumb
== ==
• measure layout and depth • UJX!n completion
• check supplier's specifications • 14 days prior to delivery to Site
• survey • UJX!n installation
l!!!!9 l!!!!!!9' I!!!!!!
Submittal! to
Rrsidmt Engine"
• contractor's certification
• none
• none
• none
• none
• none
• none
Page 2 of9
• final elevations, grades and alignment
• manufacturer's certification
• elevations
• none
• grain sire distribution curves
• none
• none
• none
• elevations
• manufacturer's certification
• final elevations
(!!!!!!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
• groundwater treatment system control center
• power supply
C.6.2 INSPECTIONS
Throughout the period of remedial construction, the
quality of work completed and material used for each of the work tasks will be
maintained at its highest possible level through regular inspections of the
work. Inspections will be completed throughout the construction by the
Resident Engineer, CQA support personnel, and representatives of USEPA on
a periodic basis, if required.
In general, inspections to be conducted by the Resident
Engineer and CQA support personnel include the following:
i) daily inspections of the work progress;
ii) inspections of material as it is delivered to the Site to check for damage
during delivery;
iii) comparison of the material deliv~red to the Site to the design
specifications to ensure that the proper material has been delivered;
iv) inspection of materials after they have been installed to ensure that it
has not been damaged during installation;
v) a pre-construction inspection, performed prior to beginning work on
any work task, including the following:
• a review of contract requirements to ensure that all materials
and/or equipment have been delivered and tested according to
applicable standards and specifications,
• ensure that provisions have been made to provide required quality
' control testing, and
• examination of the work area to ascertain that all applicable
preliminary work tasks have been completed;
C-12 CONESTOGA·ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
vi) general inspections, performed periodically as the amount of work
completed warrants an inspection, including the following:
• examination of the quality of workmanship,
• testing of materials for compliance with Contract requirements,
• any omissions, and
• general progress of work performed; and
vii) a final inspection, performed upon completion of each work task, to
ensure compliance with the Construction Drawings and Construction
Specifications and to ensure that deficiencies identified in the general
inspections have been corrected.
These inspections will be performed by the Resident Engineer and the results
of the inspections will be provided in the RA Report as defined in the SOW.
The results of all inspections will be recorded in the Daily Site Log Book as
described in Section C.7.2. Copies of the pre-construction, general and final
inspection reports will be provided to all parties involved in the inspection.
The components of each work task to be inspected, the
types of inspections required and the frequency of the inspections are
summarized in Table C.6.1. This table may be modified upon completion and
approval of the Final Design.
C-13 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
u
fl
u
u
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
Participants: Project Coordinator or Project Engineer, Resident
Engineer, Contractor's Representative and USEPA.
Topics:
• health and safety report;
• review of the work activities completed;
• comparison of actual progress to scheduled work activities, noting
of schedule slippage and actions implemented to rectify schedule
the slippage;
• summarize upcoming work activities scheduled; and
• review potential remedial cor\struction problems/ conflicts for the
upcoming remedial construction activities and proposed solutions
to the potential problems/ conflicts.
C.5.4 PROBLEM OR WORK DEFICIENCY MEETINGS
Purpose: If a problem or deficiency is present or likely to occur.
Participants: Resident Engineer and CQA Support Personnel,
Contractor Representative (optional if major problem
directly related to his work)
Topics:
• define and discuss problem or deficiency;
• review alternative solutions; and
• develop and implement a plan to resolve the problem or deficiency.
For all meetings held on Site during the remedial
construction, with the exception of the daily progress meetings, minutes will
be taken by the Resident Engineer. Copies of the minutes will be provided to
the Jadco-Hughes Steering Committee arid all organizations participating in
the meetings.
C-10 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
C.6.0 INSPECTION AND TESTING ACTIVITIES
3669 (18)
C.6.1 SCOPE
Throughout the implementation of the construction
program there will be numerous inspections and testing requirements for
specific work tasks. The inspection and testing requirements will ensure
compliance with the contract specifications, applicable building codes as well
as ensure completion of the work tasks to the highest level of quality.
Inspections and testing will provide a qualitative means
of monitoring the quality and progress of work performed.
The components of each work task which will require
inspection or testing include:
i) Excavation. Regrading. Backfilling Activities
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
• horizontal and vertical control
• compaction
• backfill material quality control
Geotechnical /Soils
• quality of native material
• compaction of backfill
Steel Work
• installation of structural steel
• connections/ tolerances
Mechanical Components
• groundwater treatment equipment testing including pumps,
blowers, flow meters, valves and other appurtenances
• pressure testing of tanks and piping
Electrical Components
• level and pressure sensors and transmitters
C-11 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C.5.0 PROTECT MEETINGS
3669 (18)
Project meetings as detailed herein will be held during the
remedial construction period to ensure that all tasks are accomplished
according to schedule and that they are completed in accordance with the
remedial construction plans and specifications. These progress meetings may
be attended by the Project Coordinator; Resident Engineer, Contractor
Representative and USEPA representative, as detailed below .
C.5.1 PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING
Purpose: To resolve any uncertainties in the remedial
construction plans and specifications, and to review
levels of responsibility, reporting requirements, and
health and safety requirements.
Participants: Project Coordinator, Resident Engineer, CQA Support
Personnel, Contractor Representative.
Topics:
• present CQAP, Contractors Project-specific Health and Safety Plan,
and other relevant documents;
• review the activities to be conducted during the remedial
construction;
' • review roles of each organization relative to the design criteria,
plans and specifications within the CQAP;
• determine any need to modify the CQAP that may be necessary to
ensure that the construction i's performed to meet or exceed the
specified design criteria;
• review lines of authority and communication;
• discuss the established procedures or protocol for observations and
tests including sampling strategies;
• discuss the established procedures or protocols for handling
construction deficiencies, repairs and retesting;
• review methods for documenting and reporting inspection data;
C-8 CONESTOCA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
• review methods for distributing and storing documents and reports;
• review work area delineation, security and safety protocol;
• discuss the location for storing construction equipment and
materials, and the protection of these items during inclement
weather;
• discuss the protection of uncompleted construction work during off
hours and during inclement weather; and
• conduct a tour to review construction areas, safety areas, and
equipment and stockpile storage locations.
C.5.2 DAILY PROGRESS MEETINGS
Purpose: To daily review work schedule progress. This meeting is
intended to be an informal meeting held at the end of
each work day or at the start of each work day.
Participants: Resident Engineer, Contractor Representative
Topics:
• review previous day's activities and progress;
• review work location and activities for upcoming day;
• review health and safety deficiencies from the previous work day
and review health and safety requirements and potential problems
for the next day's activities;
• review Contractor's personnel and equipment assignments for the
. upcoming day; and
• discuss any potential construction problems.
C.5.3 PERIODIC PROGRESS MEETINGS
Purpose: To provide a remedial construction progress update to
USEPA.
C-9 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
u
D
fl
0
B
ff
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C.4.0 PERSONNEL OUALIFICA TIONS
3669 (18)
C.4.1 RESIDENT ENGINEER
The Resident Engineer will have the following
qualifications:
i) graduate of a recognized college in a technically related field;
ii) minimum two (2) years experiel'\ce in the oversight and
implementation of hazardous waste remedial construction and CQA
activities; and
iii) good management and communication skills.
C.4.2 COA SUPPORT PERSONNEL
The CQA support personnel will have the following
minimum qualifications:
i) degree from a recognized college in engineering technology, or
equivalent; or a minimum of two (2) years experience in hazardous
waste remedial construction and CQA inspection procedures; and
ii) working knowledge of all relevant codes and regulations concerning
material and equipment installation, observation and testing
procedures, equipment, documentation procedures, and safety.
C.4.3 CONTRACTOR
The selected contractor(s) will assign experienced
personnel to supervise the implementation of each of the r_emedial
construction activities specified in the RA Work Plan. In particular, the
selected contractor will assign experienced personnel to the following
remedial construction activities:
C-6 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 {18)
i) installation of extraction wells;
ii) installation of structures;
iii) installation of mechanical and electrical components; and
iv) commissioning of mechanical and electrical components.
Experienced personnel will have a thorough knowledge
of testing procedures, equipment and documentation procedures required for
implementation of the remedial construction activities.
The selected contractor will designate an on-Site Project
Manager empowered to act on behalf of the contractor in all matters
pertaining to the remedial construction activities.
C-7 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
u
D
u
mi
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!I
I
I
I
I 3669 (18)
C.3.3 RESIDENT ENGINEER
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
The duties of the Resident Engineer are as follows:
reports to the Project Coordinator;
provides immediate supervision of all construction activities;
provides field management of CQA activities;
reviews design criteria, plans and specifications for clarity and
completeness so that the CQAP can be implemented;
informs CQA support personnel on CQA requirements and
procedures;
ensures that regular calibration of testing equipment is conducted and
recorded;
vii) ensures that all Site activities are recorded daily and maintained;
viii) ensures that CQA test results are accurately recorded;
ix) identifies work that should be accepted, rejected, or uncovered for
observation, or that may require special testing, inspection, or
' approval;
x) rejects defective work and verifies that corrective measures are
implemented; and
xi) interacts daily with the contractor to,provide assistance in modifying
the materials and work to comply with the specified design.
The individual designated to be the Resident Engineer
will be specified prior to commencement of the construction activities.
C.3.4 COA SUPPORT PERSONNEL
The duties of the CQA Support Personnel are as follows:
i) reports directly to the Resident Engine7r;
ii) conducts CQA tests and inspections as indicated in this CQAP;
iii)
iv)
v)
accurately records test results and inspections;
calibrates testing equipment as required;
maintains testing equipment in good working order; and
C-4 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
3669 (18)
vi) immediately notifies Resident Engineer whether or not test results
comply with design specifications.
The CQA Support Personnel may include the Project
Coordinator, the Project Engineer, the Resident Engineer and/ or other
personnel meeting the qualifications specified in Section C.4.2.
C.3.5 OA/OC TEST LABORATORIES
QA/QC test laboratories that will conduct CQA Quality
Control tests will be identified prior to the commencement of the
construction activities. The duties of the QA/QC test laboratories are to
provide QA/QC testing of construction activities, as requested by the Resident
Engineer, to confirm construction activities have been implemented
according to the construction specifications and drawings.
C.3.6 CONTRACTOR
The duties of the Contractor, as they relate to QA/QC, are
as follows:
i) retains qualified testing firms (for example laboratory, geotechnical), for
testing of materials and workmanship to ensure that materials meet
specified requirements;
ii)
iii)
iv)
submits samples and/ or materials for testing to determine if
samples/materials meet specified requirements, and submits results
directly to the Resident Engineer;
records daily. CQA activities in the Contractors Log Book and submits a
"Daily Construction Quality Control Report" (see Section C.7.2) to the
Resident Engineer; and
carries out construction activities according to design specifications.
C-5 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
11
i