NCD980557656_19991101_NC State University (Lot 86 Farm Unit 1)_FRCBERCLA RD_Workplan for Groundwater Remedial Design (Revised)-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WORKPLAN
FOR NCSU LOT 86
GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL DESIGN
Prepared for:
Environmental Protection Agency
And
North Carolina State University
Prepared By:
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
409 Rogers View Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
May 14, 1999
Revised November 1999
MP?;~J'lAiNTJ~
E11gi11eeri1rg & Environmental So/111/ons
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
M!1?;¾Jl~t}N!l~
Engineering & Environmental Solutions
409 Roxcrs View Court I Ruldgh I North Carolina I 27610
800-486-7568 / 919-250-99181919-250-9950 Facsimile
\1'Ww.maao11li11e.com
WORKPLAN
FOR NCSU 11.OT 86 GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL DESIGN
May 14, 1999
Revised November 1999
Mid-Atlantic Associates Job No. 099R0769
Prepared For:
Environmental Protection Agency
and I
North Carolina State University
Prepared By:
MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Janice G. Baker, Ph.D.
Senior Project Manager
Thomas A. Proctor, P.G.
Senior Environmental Geologist
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM ........................................................................... 1
I BACKGROUND SETTING ...................................................................................... 1
2.1 Site Describtion ......................................................................................... 1
2.2 Site History ............................................................................................... 2
2.3 Existing Data ............................................................................................. 2
I WORK PRODUCTS ............................................................................................. .4
31 A ···1 A··· 4 . cguis1t1on ct1v1t1es .............................................. : ................................. .
3. 2 Design Criteria Report ................................................................................ 4
3.3 Preliminary! Plans and Specifications ............................................................ 5
3.4 Plan for Satisfying Permitting Reguirements .................................................. 5
3.5 Draft Construction Schedule ....................................................................... 5
3.6 Final /Pre-Final Design .............................. : ................................................. 5
I SCHEDULE .......................................................................................................... 6
I PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................................... 7
I 5. 1 Data Management Plan .............................................................................. 7
5.2 Reporting .. 1 ................................................................................................ 7 I .
COMMUNITY RELATIONS .................................................................................... 9
DRAWINGS
Drawing 2.1 Site Vicinity Map
Drawing 2.2 Site Map for Groundwater Remedial Design
Drawing 4.1 Critical Pat~ Milestone Schedule
TABLES
Table 2.1
Table 2.2
Groundwater Analytical Results for Each of Twenty Wells
Minimum ahd Maximum Groundwater Analytical Results for Twenty Wells
M!1?;{\fl/}NTl~ .
Enginrering & £,n·ironmefllai Solritions
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WORKPLAN
FOR NCSU LOT 86
GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL DESIGN
1.0 STATEMENT 01 THE PROBLEM
The North Carolina State University (NCSU) Lot 86 Site (Lot 86) is a 1.5-acre site
located on the west ~ide of Raleigh, North Carolina. The Lot 86 site served as a
disposal site for chelnical and low level radioactive wastes generated in the
educational and resea~ch laboratories at NCSU from 1969 to 1980. The wastes
were disposed in subsurface trenches and covered with native soils. The waste
deposited in the trenches is responsible for the groundwater and soil contamination
present on site.
The site was placed on the National Priority List (NPL) in October 1984. A
Remedial Investigation Report was completed June 10, 1994. A Draft Feasibility
Study was prepared in February 1996. A Record of Decision (ROD) was issued by
the Environmental Protection Agency {EPA) on September 30, 1996. EPA selected
groundwater pump arid treat and in-situ soil mixing and encapsulation as the
remedy for this site.
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A. has been retained to prepare this Remedial Design
Work Plan {Work Plan) [tor groundwater remediation at Lot 86. The Work Plan will
be followed by preliminary and final remedial designs before groundwater
remediation is implemehted at this site. The goal of the remedial action is to restore
the groundwater to its beneficial use. • Groundwater contamination may be
especially persistent in [ the immediate vicinity of the contaminants' source, where
concentrations are relatively high. The ability to achieve remediation levels at all
points throughout the plume cannot be determined until the extraction system has
been implemented, mcidified, as necessary, and plume response monitored over
time.
2.0 BACKGROUND SETTING
2.1 Site Description
The Lot 86 site is northeast of Carter-Finley Stadium and immediately south of the
Wade Avenue Extensioh right-of-way and is surrounded by state-owned property
(Figure 2.1). The site i~ bounded on the west by the stadium parking area and
MP?;t\fl~◊N!JS:
E11gineering & Enl'/ronmen111/ Solutions
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Workplan for NCSU Lot 86 May 14, 1999
Groundwater Remedial Design Page 2
surrounded by trees oh the three remaining sides. The nearest water supply well is
reportedly located apbroximately 2,000 feet southeast of the site at the Medlin
residence.
Groundwater occurs in the silty clay/granular soils (residual and saprolite) and in the I
underlying crystalline bedrock under generally water table (unconfined) conditions.
The unconsolidated ~oils aquifer is chiefly replenished by the infiltration of
precipitation where the aquifer is exposed. The shallow unconsolidated residual
soil/saprolite water-be1aring unit exists at depths ranging from 20 feet to 40 feet
I below land surface, and flows west/northwest toward Wade Avenue.
2.2 Site History
The Lot 86 site was used as a hazardous chemical and low level radioactive waste
disposal site beginninb in 1969. The waste was generated in the University's
educational and research laboratories. The site was divided into two separate
areas as shown on Figure 2.1; the western area received the hazardous chemical
waste, and the eastern area received low level radioactive waste. Burial of waste
I was discontinued in November 1980, to comply with the regulations promulgated
under the Resource cdnservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
The chemical wastes lere placed in trenches and covered with approximately two I
feet of native soils. 1here are 22 trenches approximately ten feet deep and from
50 to 150 feet in length. Types of chemicals buried at the site include solvents,
pesticides, inorganics, acids, and bases. NCSU reported that it had disposed of
approximately 11,000 cubic yards of chemical waste at the site. Quantities
reported included lightly contaminated soils and water as well as actual waste
materials.
Radiological wastes were buried in nine trenches approximately 6 feet deep and 50
to 120 feet long. The depth of wastes in the bottom of the trenches was reported
to be two feet with fo~r feet of native soil cover material. Most of the waste was
in· solid form, primarily animal carcasses ranging in size from rats to whole sheep.
Radionuclides present in the waste include tritium, carbon-14, iron-59, and
phosphorus-32.
The site was placed on the National Priority List in October 1984, based on results
from an inspection conipleted in June 1984.
2.3 Existing Data
A significant amount of site data has been collected during previous investigations.
Thirty-three wells were installed near the site prior to 1993 and ongoing sampling
MP?;{\Jl~~N!J~
/:"111;i111•1•rin,: & E111•iro11me111a/ S0/111/011.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Workp/an for NCSU Lot 186 May 14, 1999
Groundwater Remedial Design Page 3
of these wells has bJen conducted since the early 1980s (Figure 2.2). In 1993,
I eight new stainless steel monitoring wells were constructed during the Remedial
Investigation. Sample1s were collected from the eight new wells, 11 existing wells,
and one domestic w~II (Medlin residence). Groundwater analytical results from
these 20 wells are sJmmarized in Table 2.1. In Table 2.1, the balded analytical
results are actual me~sured levels, while the "less than" values indicate laboratory
detection limits. The r\iinimum and maximum detected levels for each contaminant
in these 20 wells are Jummarized in Table 2.2.
Groundwater analyticli results indicated that volatile organic chemicals (VOes)
were the most prev~lent group with low levels of semivolatile organics and
pesticides detected. \/Oe concentrations are notably higher in the shallow aquifer
than in the bedrock a~uifer, with the highest concentration near the landfill. voes
were not present in b~ckground and upgradient wells. The highest dissolved voe I concentrations were detected in wells MW-37S, MW-36S, MW-5A, and MW-1 B in
' the upper five to ten feet of the saturated zone, immediately west and northwest
of the landfill, nearest the disposal trenches. The highest concentrations measured
included: acetone -16,000 micrograms per liter (µg/1) in MW-36S; benzene
14,000 µg/I in MW-3~S; carbon tetrachloride 6,400 µg/I in MW-37S, chloroform -
63,000 µg/I in M'«-37S; methylene chloride -18,000 µg/I in MW-37S;
tetrachloroethene -5,000 µg/I in MW-37S; and trichloroethene -1,300 µg/1 in
MW-36S. Low levels bf voes were detected in some of the deep wells.
All of the semivolatilJs and pesticides detected in the groundwater were at low I
level concentrations. Within the semivolatile organic group, three parameters were
detected in samples I collected from three different wells. Bis(2-ethlyhexyl)
phthalate was detected at 41 milligrams per liter (mg/I) in the background well MW-
34D. lsophorone w~s detected at 570 mg/I in MW-37, and napthalene was
detected at 31 mg/I in1 MW-36S. Pesticides (chordane, dieldrin, and lindane) were
detected in shallow wJlls MW-34S, MW-35S, and MW-37, respectively.
I
The following metals Jere detected in downgradient wells at concentrations above
those present in th1e upgradient wells (maximum detected levels are in
parentheses): arsenic I (110 µg/1), barium (960 µg/1), calcium (28,000 µg/1),
chromium 17 (µg/I), cobalt (89 µg/I), copper (68 µg/I), lead (31 ~Lg/I), magnesium
I 5,600 (µg/I), mangane'se (20,000 µg/I), nickel (73 µg/1), potassium (15,000 µg/I),
sodium (20,000 ~Lg/I), kine (660 ~Lg/I).
All groundwater samplL were analyzed for carbon-14 and tritium. earbon-14 was
I detected in only in MW-38 above the detection limit of 500 pico-curies per liter
I •
(peill) at 522 pei/1. T[ritium was detected at three wells at concentrations ranging
from 711 pei/I to 6,000 pei/1, which are well below the Mel of 20,000 pei/1.
MP?;{\f,~◊N!J~
E1rgineeri111; & En1'ironmen1al So/11tiuns
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Workplan for NCSU Lot 86
Groundwater Remedial Design
I 3.0 WORK PRODUCTS
May 14, 1999
Page 4
This document is a Work Plan for the Lot 86 Groundwater Remedial System
Design. It is accompanied by a Sampling and Analysis Plan, Quality Assurance
Program Plan, and la Health and Safety Plan. Following approval of these
documents a Preliminary Design and a Final Design for the Remedial System will be
completed. The stepJ to be completed for the design, as well as, purpose of the
tasks, information to be collected, and documents to be produced are summarized
below.
3 1 A . . . A I ... . cqws1t1on ct1v1t1es
I
Data collection will include review of previous onsite investigations, an aquifer
pumping test, and sufveys. Data gathered during the project planning phase will be
compiled, summarized, and submitted to NCSU, the EPA, and the North Carolina
Department of Envircinment and Natural Resources (DENR). An analysis of the
impact of the result~ on design activities will be included. In addition, surveys
conducted to establis1h topography, right-of-ways, easements, and utility lines will I be documented. Utility requirements and acquisition of access, through purchases
or easements that a~e necessary to implement the Remedial Action will also be
discussed. An aquif~r pumping test at the site will determine site specific
hydrologic parameterJ to be used in the design of the remedial system. . I
3.2 Design Criteria Report
I
I
The concepts suppo~
1
ting the technical aspects of the design will be defined in
detail and· presented in this report. Specifically, the Design Criteria Report will
include the preliminary design assumptions and parameters, including:
) W h I . . a aste c aractenzat1on
b) Treatability study
) P I . c retreatment requirements
d) Volume of each media requiring treatment
e) Treatment sch~mes (including all media and by-products)
I f) Input and output rates I g) Influent and effluent qualities
h) Materials and ebuipment
I i) Performance standards
' j) Long-term monitoring requirements
I
The evaluations condGcted to select the design approach will be described. Data
from the aquifer pumping test will be an integral part of the design.
I .
MP?;{\fl~◊N!J~
Engineering & Enl'ironmentul Solutions
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Workplan for NCSU Lot 186
Groundwater Remedial fJesign
I
3.3 Preliminary Pla~s and Specifications
May 14, 1999
Page 5
An outline of the reduired drawings, including preliminary sketches and layouts,
describing conceptual !aspects of the design, unit processes, etc. will be submitted.
An outline of the required specifications, including performance tandards, will also
be submitted. Construction drawings will reflect organization and clarity, and the
I
scope of the technical specifications will be outlined in a manner reflecting the final
specifications.
3.4 Plan for Satisfying Permitting Requirements
All activities will be Jerformed in accordance with the requirements of applicable
federal and state law~ and regulations. Disposal of soil cuttings and groundwater
I will be handled by NCSU. Any off-site disposal will be in compliance with the
policies stated in the I Procedure for Planning and Implementing Off-site Response
Actions (Federal Register, Volume 50, Number 214, November, 1985, pages
45933-45937) and Federal Register, Volume 55, Number 46, March 8, 1990, page
8840, and the Nation1al Contingency Plan, Section 300.400. If offsite disposal is
I
selected, an offsite disposal plan will identify any permits that are required, the
time required to procebs the permit applications, and a schedule for submittal of the
permit applications.
3.5 Draft Construction Schedule
I
A Draft Constructi!n Schedule will be developed for construction and
implementation of th~ remedial action, which identifies timing for initiation and
completion of all critic'al path tasks. The schedule will specifically identify dates for
completion of the proj~ct and major milestones.
I 3.6 Final/Pre-Final Design
I
NCSU, EPA, and NC .DENR comments on the Preliminary Design and a
memorandum indicati~g how comments were incorporated will be included in the
Pre-final/Final Design. IThe Pre-final Design will be submitted when the design work
is approximately 90 percent complete, in accordance with the approved design
management schedule. Comments generated from the Preliminary Design Review
will be addressed and any modification of the design as a result of incorporation of
the comments will be clearly shown. Essentially, the Pre-final Design will function
as the draft version ofl the Final Design.
MP?;Nl;(~N!lS:.
Engin1'erin1; & £ndrvnme11tal Solu1ion.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Workplan for NCSU Lot !B6
Groundwater Remedial Design
I
May 14, 1999
Page 6
After NCSU, EPA, and NC DENR review and comment on the Pre-final Design, the
Final Design will be s~bmitted alorig with a memorandum indicating how the Pre-
final Design comments were incorporated into the Final Design. All Final Design
documents will be ce1rtified by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of
North Carolina. NCSU, EPA, and NC DENR written approval of the Final Design will I be obtained before initiating the RA, unless specifically authorized by NCSU, EPA,
' and NC DENR. The following items will be submitted with or as part of the Pre-
final/Final Design. i ·
a) Complete Design Analyses
The selected design will be presented along with an analysis supporting
the design approach. Design calculations will be included.
I b) Final Plans and Specifications
A complete\ set of construction drawings and specifications which
describe the
1
selected design will be submitted.
c) Final Constructibn Schedule
A final construction schedule will be submitted for approval.
d) C . C I E . . onstruct1on est st1mate
An estimate [ with + 1 5 · percent to -10 percent of actual construction
costs will be1submitted.
4.0 SCHEDULE
A Critical Path MHestJne (CPM) chart for this project is presented in Figure 4.1 .
This chart indicates iAitiation and completion dates for tasks and critical paths.
Submittal dates for d~liverables are summarized below. This proposed schedule
meets the requirementk of the Consent Decree.
RD Work Plan
Sampling and Analysis Plan
I Health and Safety Plan . I
Results of Data Acquisition Activities
' Design Criteria Report
Preliminary Plans and Specifications
Plan for Satisfyi~g Permit Requirements
Complete Desig~ Analyses
Final Plans and Specifications
. I
5/6/99
5/6/99
5/6/99
10/21/99
10/21 /99
10/21 /99 .
10/21 /99
2/18/00
2/18/00
MP?;~\flA,}N!l~
Engi111'erini; & Enl'ironmenta/ S0/11/ion.~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Workplan for NCSU Lot1 86
Groundwater Remedial Design
-I
Final Construction Schedule
Itemized Const~uction Cost Estimate
RA Work Plan I
Project Delivery Strategy
Construction m'anagement Plan
Construction oic.. Plan
Construction H~alth & Safety Plan
5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN
I 5.1 Data Management Plan
2/18/00
2/18/00
2/18/00
2/18/00
2/18/00
2/18/00
2/18/00
May 14, 1999
Page 7
Data from the aquifJr pumping test, including flow rates and drawdown in the
pumping test well land in nearby observation wells will be collected and
summarized. Additional data will include analytical tests to characterize soil I cuttings and collected groundwater.
' I
Microsoft Access® will be used as the data management system for the Remedial
Design. All field and] laboratory testing results will be entered into Access® to
facilitate efficient retrieval, sorting, and composing tables for importation into
I reports. Although data may be manipulated to facilitate interpretation, the original
data will be available1 on the original lab and field sheets, as well as in Access®
files. This approach livill permit independent verification of results. All computer I
data will be backed jup daily onto magnetic tape, which will be stored offsite.
Access® is a flexible data management system; data formatting will be discussed
with NCSU before fin~lization.
Microsoft Office 97® will be utilized for most data management and reporting to
facilitate transfer and summary. Reports will be provided as electronic files
(Microsoft Word 97® and Excel 97®). as well as in hard copy. Schedule and
progress will be track~d utilizing Microsoft Project®.
Draft and final doculents will be individually numbered and dated. Numbered
copies will be assigned to individuals/organizations to facilitate document control.
5.2 Reporting I
-I Monthly Progress Letters
Monthly progress lettts will be submitted by the 5th of each month. These letters
will summarize work! performed and problems encountered during the previous
month. The financial and technical progress of each task will be presented as well
MP?;~J',~◊N!l~
Engineering & Enl'ironmf.'1r1al S0l111ion.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Workplan for NCSU Lot ;86 May 14, 1999
Groundwater Remedial Design Page 8
. as any anticipated sc~edule deviations. Progress versus schedule will be presented
utilizing Microsoft Prdject®. Telephone and meeting notes will be attached to the
progress letter. Outstanding requests for data/authorizations/decisions will be
summarized. Work pl~nned for the next month will also be presented. . I
Deliverables
All deliverables will be submitted in draft form for review by NCSU prior to the
submittal dates listed I above. Comments will be incorporated {if received in time)
and "official" deliverables will be submitted on or before the due dates previously
listed.
Meetings and Presentations
i
The following five meetings/presentations with NCSU, EPA, and/or NCSU are
planned:
a) Project Kick-off I Meeting ·
Timing: After project go-ahead and data files are received by Mid-Atlantic.
Goal: Introduce~ project team, establish communication procedures, discuss
format for first deliverables {RD Work Plan, SAP, and Health and Safety
Plan). l
b) Review of RD Work Plan ' Timing: After NCSU/EPA/NC DENR review of 5/6/99 submittals
' Goal: Discuss I the approach presented in the RD Work Plan and
accompanying documents and plans for data acquisition.
c) Planning for Detgn Criteria Report ·
Timing: AugustlSeptember, 1999 after data acquisition. I . Goal: Discuss approach to be included in Design Criteria Report and other ' 10/21 /99 submittals.
d) Review of Desiln Criteria Report
Timing: After N~SU/EPA/NC DENR review of 10/21 /99 submittals.
Goal: Review documents provided 10/21 /99 and plan for complete design
' analyses and Rf Work Plan.
' e) Review of RA Work Plan
I
Timing: After NCSU/EPA/NC DENR review of 2/18/00 submittals.
Goal: Review d6cuments submitted 2/18/00.
MP?;~J};t}NTl9.
Engineering & £nl'ironmental Solutions
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Workplan for NCSU Lot
1
86
Groundwater Remedial Design
6.0 COMMUNITY RELATIONS
May 14, 1999
Page 9
One set of the follojing documents will be placed in the Cameron Village Public
Library for review by !the public: Remedial Design Work Plan and Remedial Action
Work Plan. Mid-Atlantic staff will attend public meetings if requested to do so,
however, costs for prbparation and attendance at public meetings are not included
in this project.
MP?;~\f,½◊N!J~
Engineering & E,n•ironmenta/ Solutions
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I . DRAWINGS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I MP?;{\Jlt~N!J9
Engineering & Enl'ironmenral So/111/ons
g
n
d
D I
t?<:'<:'o>-
0?<:'<:'k .. n . . t?o-10
I I
I
m LOT!86
Sl1jE
I
I
I NCSU O
RU
Cl <(
0 a:: g ..r-REX. HOSPITAL
a:
w O LAKE BOONE TRAIL
.::i -J llJ
WADE. AVE. EXTENSION
lb CARTER-FlNLEY
STADIUM ,
.~~.._~._ ME:OUN RESIDENCE.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. I
OLD TRINITY ROAD I
~ I
STA~
FAIRGROUNDS .
Figure 2. 1 North .Carolina State University
Lot 86 Site Vicinity Map
C
•
I
I
I
I
I
••
'
••
Iii MW-45
Iii MW-15
MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, P.A.
RALEIGH, NC -CHARLOTTE, NC ---PHILADELPHIA, PA
e MW-32
MW-JO Iii lhlW-JI
,•-•-•----~
l ,.
x-x-x-,c
-~-·----~
',(--',(----.-~~~~~~:<(.,,_:A~ -27A ii!0MW-2
7
-OJ
W-OJB
1A -OJA
,.l,IW-OSB
fl MW-29
~-OS -NEW AQUIFER
MW-38Sl!lli!MW-J60 · PUMPm:ri_ TEST
0
,.lllMW-09 "'MW-355
eMW-350
LOT 85
SUPERFUNO SrTE
SITE MAP
FOR GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL · DESIGN
NCSU-LOT 86
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
REFERENCE: SEE "NOTES:"
!.£GENO
MW-14 Iii
Iii MW-29 MONITORING WELL LOCATION
i!I MW-15 MONITORING WELL CLOSED IN JULY 1995
FENCE
~ WOOD LINE
WASTE BURIAL AREA
Norrs:
MAP PREPARED BY GEi CONSULTANTS IN OCTOBER 1995,
♦ SrTE W,P BASED ON SURVEY DRAWINGS "WELL ANO
FEATURE LOCATIONS," DATED JULY 19, 1997; "ROAD LOCATION .ANO DRILL POSmON LOCATION," DATED NOVEMBER 18, 1997: ANO •MONITOR WEl.1.
ANO HEADWALL LOCATION w.p• DATED AUGUST 4,
1998; ALL BY MURPHY SACKS.
♦ WASTE BURIAL AREA PER MARSHALL MILLER ,II
ASSOCIATIES, MARCH 1998
• LOCATIONS OF CLOSED WELLS MW-18, MW-19, ANO
MW-20 PER NCSU MEAS, MARCH 15, 1993. .
01-01eso2
DRAWN: DATE: MAY 1999
OFT CHECK: SCALE: 1" = 1 oo·
ENG CHECK: JOB: O99RO769.OO
APPROVAL: DWG: 2.2
1998 1999 . -2000
8/17 2/1 2 '2 ' 3 ~ .,._ 3'3 3'<4--3'10 3/11 3'12 5 '8 5,.,_.. 17 8'18-7 '29 1 "' 10/21 10/22 12 23 12 '24 12'27 • '18 • 18 4/21 4 24 8'2 8 ~ e '23 e '28 8 '21 8"21
BEGIN <:ti COHTRACroR SEARCH --
RD/RA CONT!lACTOR SELECTION PROC
lENTATM: SEI..ECTION
~ ~RCJV.l,L OF CONTRACTOR
RECEM: N'Pfl!NN.. FROM EPA -
I ISSUE RO/RA CONTRACT =
:tt
PLANS AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN
I WORK PLAN
SAMPUNG ANO ANAL'!'SIS Pl.AN •.
---· - -... •---------------. ---·-·. -------· .. -.... -. -----------· -----···--·-----·-··
I H&s Pl.AN
EPA Pl.AN REV & APPR<NN.. ,,.,
1::1::1 -------·-------------. --- ---·----------~ ------------------------------------FIEID DATA COU£c'TKJN -I 1±1:l
RESULTS OF DATA ACQUISITION
..
I DESIGN CRITERlf, REPORT
PREI.JMINAR'I' PLANS ANO SPECS
• PERMIT PLAN ,
I EPA N'f'RWN.. OF PRELIMINARY llfSICN
-
PREFllW./FlNN.. DESIGN .
I COIIPLEIE DESIGN ANALYSIS
FINN.. PLANS ANO SPECS
I FINN.. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE . & COST ESllMAn:
RA PUNNING (AU. PLANS)
I EPA RE\'ISION OF FINN.. DESIGN
EPA REVISION OF RA Pt.ANS
I . MOOfFICATlON OF RA PlANS
l .. . PUNS TO EPA-SCHEDULE CONFERENCE -
ttttl I PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE -
CONSTRUCTION IMPu:MENTA110N .
II ·-n, f '
I
-/ol 1998 ~~ CRITICAL PATH MILESTONE SCHEDULE DRAWN: DATE: NOVEMBER }Re Enw.t0Rffl9RfQ,t .Sotblt,•on& .PsgpJB .. GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL DESIGN DFT CHECK: SCALE: NTS
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY-LOT 86 ENG CHECK: JOB: 099R0769.00 ' RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, P.A. APPROVAL: DWG: 4.1 -
RN..EJGH, NORTH CAROUNA-CHARLOTTE,:NORTH CAROLINA I REFERENCE: I ..
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I -
I
I
I -TABLES
I
I
I
0
I
I
I ---
I
I M!1?;{\f,~~N!JS:.
l:nginccnng & Environmrn/11/ So/111ionJ
I:
ll
I'.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
Parameters
Volatiles fug/Ll
1,1, 1-Trichlorethane
1, 1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloretbane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
1,2-Dichloroorooane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-methyl-2-oentanone
Acetone
Be'nzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bro mo methane
Camon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methylene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Total Xvlene Isomers
Trichloroethene
Vinyl Chloride
cis-1 ,3-Dichloroorooene
lrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Semiv!!IB!il~ (IJll:!Ll
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2'-oxvbis (1-Chloroprooane)
2,4,5-Trichloroohenol
2.4.6-T richlorophenol
Brown and Caldwell
G:\7200t7200T4-I 4.XLS
TABLE 2.1
Groundwater Analytical Results
For Each of Twenty Wells
GW-34S(bkg) GW-34D(bkg) GW-35S GW-350 SHAU1lW BEDROCK SHAU.OW BEDROCK
<I <1 <I <1
<I <1 <I <l
<1 <l <I <1
<1 <1 <I <1
<1 <1 <I <1
<I <l <I <1
<I <1 <I <1
<1 <l <I 2.1
<5 <5 <5 <5
<5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5
<ID <10 <10 25
<I <1 <I 5.4
<I <I 3.9 3.7
<I <I <I <1
<I <I <I <I
<2 <2 <2 <2
<I <I <I <I
<I <I <I 0.56
<I <I <I <I
<I <I 20 SI
<I <I <I <I
<I <I 0.7 <r
<I <I <I <I
<I <I <I 2.7
<I <I <I <I
<I <I <I 1.2
<I <I <I 1.3
<3 <3 <3 <3
<I <I <:I 3.4
<I <I <I <I <I <I <I <I
<I <I <I <I
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <IO
<30 <30 <30 <30.
<10 <10 <10 <IO
Page I of9
GW-36S GW-36S-<lui GW-36D
SHALLOW SHAU1)W BEDROCK
27 30 <1
200 200 <1
130 140 <1
20 23 <1
19 23 <I
<1 <1 <I
2.8 3.1 <I
830 900 1.5
·1100 1300 <5
5.3 5.6 <5
57 59 <5
15000 16000 <ID
4900 5100 <1
110 120 <1
35 36 <I
<I <I <I
<2 <2 <2
1500 1800 6.3
21 22 . <I
<1 <I <I
37000 39000 63
<I <I <I
3.2 3.5 <I
40 43 <1
7800 8300 <I
<I <I <I
120 130 4.8
400 380 <I
700 700 <3
1200 1300 4.0
<1 <I <I
<I <I <I
<I <1 <I
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <ID <10
<10 <IO <10
<30 <30 <30
<10 <IO <10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Parameters
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethvlohenol
2,4-Dinitroohenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2-Ch!oronaohthalene
2-{:h!orophenol
2-Methvl-4,6-dinitroohenol
2-Methylnaohthalene
2-Methylphenol ( o-Cresol)
2-Nitroanilinc
2-Nitrophenol
3-3"-Dichlorobenzidine
3-Nitroaniline
4-Bromoohenvlohenvlether
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
· 4-Chloroaniline
4-Chlorophenylphenylether
4-Methvlohcnol (n-Cresol)
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroohenol
Acenaphthene
Accnaohthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)ovrcne
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(£,h.i)ocrvlene
Benzo(k)fluoranthenc
Bis(2-chloroethoxv)methane
Bis(2-chlorocthyl)ether
Bis(2-.:thvlhexyl)ohthalate
Butvlbcn:,:vlphthalate
Carbazole
Chrvsene
Di-n-octvlohthalate
Dibcnzo(a,h)anthraccne
Dibcnzofuran
Dibutylphthalate
Diethvlohthalate
Dimethylphthalate
Auoranthene
Auorcne
Hexach!orobcnzcne
Brown and Caldwell
G:\7200\7200'T4-14JCl..S
TABLE 2.1
Groundwater Analytical Results
For Each of Twenty Wells
GW-34S(bkg) GW-34D(bkg) GW-35S GW-35D
SHAll.OW BEDROCK SHAU.OW BEDROCK
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<30 <30 <30 <30
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<ID <10 <10 <10
<30 <30 <30 <30
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 · <10 <10
<30 <30 <30 <30
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<30 <30 <30 <30
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<30 <30 <30 <30
<30 <30 <30 <30
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 41 <10 <10
<10 ·<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
Page 2 of9
' GW-36S GW-36S-<iuJ GW-36D '
SHAllOW SHAU.OW BEDROCK
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<30 <30 <30
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <ID <10
<10 <10 <10
<30 <30 <30
<10 <10 <10
<10 <ID <10
<30 <30 <30
<10. <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<30 <30 <30
<10 <10 <10
· <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
·<JO <10 <10
<30 <30 <30
<30 <30 <30
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Parameters
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocvclo.,.,,,tadiene
Hexachloroethane
lncleno( 1,2,3-c,d)ovrene
lsoohorone
N-Nitrosodi-n-oroovlamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Naohthalene
Nitrobenzene -
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Pesticides /ug/Ll
Aldrin
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232.
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
BHC, aloha isomer
BHC, beta isomer
BHC, delta isomer
BHC, gamma isomer (Llndane)
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Eadosulfan II
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Enc!rin ketone
Endrin aldehyde
Heptaehlor
Heptachlor eooxide
Methoxvchlor
Toxaphene
a-Chlordane
g-Chlordane
o,p'-DDD
o,o'-DDE
p,p'-DDT
Brown and Caldwell
G:\7200\nOOT4--14.XLS
TABLE 2.1
Groundwater Analytical Results
For Each of Twenty Wells
..
GW-34S(bkg) GW-34D(bkg) GW-35S GW-35D
SHAU.OW BEDROCK SHAU.OW BEDROCK
<JO <10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10 <10
<JO <JO <10 <10
<JO <JO <10 <10
<JO <10 <10 <10
<JO <JO <10 <10
<10 <JO <10 <JO
<10 <10 -<10 <10
<10 <JO <10 <10
<30 <30 <30 <30
<10 <10 <10 <10
<JO <JO <10 <10
<10 <JO <10 <10
<0.05 <0.05. <0.05 <0.05
<I <I <I <I
<2 <2 <2 <2
<I <I <I <I
<I <I <I <I
<I <I <I <I
<I <I <I <I
<I <I <I <I
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.1 <0.1 0.013 <0.1
<0.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.1 <0.1 <0.I <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.I <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
<5 <5 <5 <5
0.013 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
0.041 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Page 3 of9
GW-36S GW-36S-du1 GW-36D
SHALLOW SHAU.OW BEDROCK
<10 <JO <IO
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <JO
<10 <10 <10
<10 <10 <10
31 29 <10
<10 <10 <10
<30 <30 <30
<10 <10 "<10
<10 <10 <JO
<10 <10 <10
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<I <! <I
<2. <2 <2
<I <I <I
<I <I <I
<I <! <I
<I <I <I
<I <I <I
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.05 -<0.05 <0.05
-<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.5 <0.5 <0.5
<5 <5 <5
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.1 <0.I <0.1
<0.1 <0.I <0.1
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Parameters
M~tals; l!a~ farnmetec; (mi:lL:*l
1'vanidc
nH (*standard units)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic :
Barium
Bcrvllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Conner
Iron
Lead
Ma•nesium
Man,anese
Mercurv
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
B,adj2active (l!Cill,l
Carbon-14
Tritium
TABLE 2.1
Groundwater Analytical Results
For Each of Twenty Wells
GW-34S(bkg) GW-34D(bkg) GW-35S
SIWJ.OW BEDROCK SIWJ.OW
<0.02 <0.02 <0.02
6.5 II 7.1
3.8 1.0 0.73
<0.06 <0.06 <0.06
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01
<0.2 <0.2 <0.2
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005
6.2 65 <5
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.025 <0.025 <0.025
3.3 1.2 0.43
<0.003 <0.003 <0.003
5.3 <5 <5
0.37 0.073 0.67
<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
<0.04 <0.04 <0.04
<5 13 <5
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01
<5 19 11
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
0.078 <0.02 0.025
<500 <500 <500
<500 <500 <5_00
GW-35D GW-36S GW-36S-duJ
BFDROCK SHALLOW SIWJ.OW
<0.02 <0.02 <0.02
9.2 6.5 6.4
0.94 2.2 2.2
<0.06 <0.06 <0.06
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01
<0.2 0.94 0.96
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005
23 6.7 7.8
0.02 <0.01 <0.01
<0.05 0.089 0.087
0.048 0.065 0.068
1.2 1.1 1.1
<0.003 0.021 0.021
<5 <5 <5
0.46 20 20
<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
<0.04 <0.04 <0.04
31 <5 <5
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01
23 <5 <5
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05
0.067 0.38 0.38
<500 <500 <500
<500. <500 <500
Note: Existing monitoring wells were analyzed for volatiles and radiation, only. Newly constructed. wells were analyzed
for the T AlJfCL list of parameters and radiation.
Brown and Caldwell
G:\7200\ 7200T 4--I 4JCI..S Page 4 of9
GW-36D
BEDROCK
<0.02
10
0.27
<0.06
0.11
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005'
28
<0.01
<0.05
. <0.025
<0.1
<0.003
<5
<0.015
<0.0002
<0.04
15
<0.005
<0.01
20
<0.01
<0.05
<0.02
<500
3890
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Parameters
.
YoJatiles fug/Ll
!,1,1-Trichlorcthane
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
I, 1,2-Trichlorethane
I, 1-Dichloroethane
I, 1 -Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
1,2-Dichlorool'Ollane
2-Butanooe
2-Hexanone
4-methvl-2-nentanone
Acetone
Benune
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
}lromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenune
Chlorocthane
Chlorofoan
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
Ethvlbenzcne
Methvlaic Chloride
Stvrcne
Tettachloroethene
Toluene
Total Xvlene Isomers
Trichloroethene
Vinvl Chloride ·
cis-1,3-Dichloroprooene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
S~miv11!11tiles !mi:LLl
1.2,4-Trichlorobenune
1,2-Dichlorobenu,ne
1,3-Dichlorobenu,ne
1,4-Dichlorobenu,ne
2,2'-oxvbis (1-Chloroorooane)
2.4.5-Trichloroohenol
2.4 ,6-Trichloroohenol
Brown and Caldwell
G:\72Wt7200T,4.UJCLS
TABLE 2.1
Groundwater Analytical Results
For Each of Twenty Wells
GW-37S GW-38D MEDLIN GW-30
SHALLOW BEDROCK BEDROCK SHAU.OW
18 <I <0.5 <0.5
190 5.8 <I <I
16 <1 <1 <1
39 <I <0.5 <0.5
17' <1 <05 <0.5
<1 2.5 <0.5 <0.5
31 <1 <0.5 . <0.5
650 28 <0.5 <0.5
<5 <5 <0.5 <0.5
<5 <5 <0.5 <0.5
110 3.0 <0.5 <0.5
8200 190 <0.5 <0.5
14000 7.3 <0.5 <0.5
280 44 ., <0.5 <0.5
<1 <1. <0.5 <0.5
. <1 <1 <0.5 <0.5
<2 <2 <0.5 <0.5
6400 39 <0.5 <0.5
150 1.0 <0.5 <0.5
<1 <1 <0.5 <0.5
63000 510 <0.5 <0.5
<I <1 <0.5 <0.5
<1 <I <0.5 <0.5
89 <1 <0.5 <0.5
18000 59 <I <1
<1 <1 <0.5 <0.5
5000 5.7 <0.5 <0.5
1500 <I <0.5 <0.5
350 <3 <05 <0.5
1000 20 <0.5 <0.5
3;7 <1 <0.5 <0.5
<I <1 <0.5 <0.5
<1 <I <0.5 <0.5
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<300 <30 <30 -
<100 <10 <10 -
Page 5 of9
GW-31 GW-32 GW-33 GW-5A
SHAU.OW SIWJ.OW SHAU.OW SHAU.OW
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<I <I <10 <3000
<1 <1 <10 <3000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 . <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 1500
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 3400
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 30000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<1 <I <10 3000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 850
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
<0.5 <0.5 <10 <2000
-

-
--------

-
------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Parameters
2,4-Dichloropheool
2,4-Dimethvloheool
2,4-Dioitrooheool
2,4-Dioitretolueoe
2,6-Dioitrotolueoe
2-Chloroo•nhthaleoe
2-Chloropheool
2-Methvl-4,6-dinitrooheool
2-Methv!oanhthaleoe
2-Methyloheool (o-Crcsol)
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitrepheool
3-3'-Dichlorobeozidine
3-Nitroaniline
4-Bromooheovlohenvlether
4-Chloro-3-methvlphenol
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chlorooheavlpheavlether
4-Methvloheool (o-Crcsol)
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrooheool
Aceoaohtheoe
Aceo•nhthvlene
Aothraceoe
Beozo(a)aothraceae
Beozo(a\nvneae
Beozo(b)fluoraotheoe
Beaz or• ,h,i)oervleoe
Beozo(k)fluoraotheoe
Bis(2-chloroethoxv)methaoe
Bis(2-chloroethvl)ether
Bis(2-ethvlhexvl)ohthalate
Butvlben=lohthalate
Carbazole
rhrvseoe
Di-n-octvlohthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)aothracene
Dibeozofuran
Dibutvlohthalate
DiethvlPhthalate
Dimethvlohthalate
Auorantheoe
Auoreoe
Hexachlorobeozene
Brown and Caldwell
G:\7200-.TIOOT"-t-4.xi..s
:
TABLE 2.1
Groundwater Analytical Results
For Each of Twenty Wells
GW-37S GW-38D MEDLIN GW-30
SHAU.OW BEDROCK BEDROCK SHAU.OW
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<300 <30 <30 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<300 <30 . <30 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<300 <30 <30 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<300 <30 <30 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 --
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<300 <30 <30 -
<300 <30 <30 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 --
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 --
<100 <10 <10 --
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 --
Page 6 of9
GW-31 GW-32 GW-33 GW-5A
SHAU.OW SHAU.OW SHALLOW SHALLOW
----- ---- - ------- -------- -------
----- - --- ---
----
--------- - --- - --- ---
---------
----
----
-----
- - --- ---- ---------
----- - --
-- --- - ----- - ---
----- - --- -------- - --- - -------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Parameters
Hcxachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclooentadicne
Hexachlorocthaoe
Iodeno(l ,2,3-c,dmvrene
Isopborone
N-Ni1rosodi-n-oroovlaminc
N-Ni1rosodiobenvlamioe
Naobtbalene
Nitro benzene
Pcntachloroobenol
Pbcoaothrcne
Phenol
Pyrcne
Pesticides /ug/IJ
Aldrin
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
BHC. alpha isomer
BHC, beta isomer
BHC, delta isomer
BHC, 2ainma isomer (Lindaoc)
Dicldrio
Endosulfao 1
Eodosulfao Il
Eodosulfao sulfate
Endrio
Eodrin lcctone
Eodrin aldehyde
Heptachlor
H=tachlor eooxide
Methoxvchlor
Tonnbcne
a-Chlordane
2-Chlordaoe
p,p'-OOO
o,o'-DDE
p,p'-DDT
Brown and Caldwell
G:\720'Jl..7200T4-14JCLS
TABLE 2.1
Groundwater Analytical Results
For Each of Twenty Wells
GW-37S GW-38O MEDLIN GW-30
SHAllOW BEDROCK BEDROCK SHAU.OW
<100 <10 <10 . -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -<100 <10 <10 -
570 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <IO -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<300 <30 <30 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<100 <10 <10 -
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -
<I <I <I --<2 <2. <2 -
<I <l <l -
<I <l <1 -
<l <l <1 -<I <l <l -
<I <l <l -
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -
0.016 <0.05 <0.05 -
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -
<5 <5 <5
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -
<0.1 <0.1 <O.! -
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -
Page 7 of9
GW-31 GW-32 GW-33 GW-5A
SHAU.OW SHAllOW SHAU.OW SIIAU.OW
------

-
-----------------------

-
-------------------

-
-
--------------

-
---

-
---

-
--------

-
------------------------------. ------------------
----
-----------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Parameters
Mgta!s; H!!.Sl farnmgtec; (mi:LL;*l
Cvanidc
· oH (*standard units)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Bervllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Coooer
Iron
Lead
Mavnesium
Manganese
Mercurv
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium -
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
B.a!!i!iactivt (l!!:iLLl
Carbon-14
Tritium
TABLE 2.1
Groundwater Analytical Results
For Each of Twenty Wells
GW-37S GW-38D MEDLIN GW-30 GW-31
SHAU.OW BEDROCK BEDROCK SHAU.OW SHAU.OW
<0.02 <0.02 <0.01 --
6.1 9.4 6.61 --
3.9 0.37 <0.2 --
<0.06 <0.06 <0.06 --
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 --
0.9 <0.2 <0.2 --
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 --
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 --
11 22 <5 --
0.017 <0.01 <0.01 --
0.069 <0.05 <0.05 --
0.078 0.046 0.062 --
1.8 0.49 <0.1 --
0.031 <0.003 <0.003 --
5.6 <5 <5 --
8.3 0.028 <0.015 --
<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 --
0.073 <0.04 <0.04 --
<5 7.1 <5 --
<0.005 <0.005 <0.005 --
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 --
16 16 7.8 --
<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 --
<0.05 <0.05 <0.05 --
0.23 <0.02 0.66 --
<500 522 <500 <500 <500
6000 <500 <500 <500 <500
GW-32 GW-33
SHAU.OW SHAU.OW
------
----
--
--
--
--
--------
--
--
----
------
----
--
----
<500 <500
<500 711
Note: Existing monitoring wells were analyzed for volatiles and radiation, only. Newly constructed wells were analyzed
for the T AUTCL list of parameters and radiation.
Brown and Caldwell
0:\7200\nOOT4-14.X:LS Page 8 of9
GW-5A
SHAU.OW
-----
-----
-
--------------
<500
<500
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Parameters
V 2l;Jtilgi; {m:L.Ll
· I, 1. 1-Trichlorcthane
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,1,2-Trichlorcthane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
1,2-Dichloroorooane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
.4-methvl-2-nentanone
Acetone
Benzene
B romodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride·
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane .
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
Ethylbenzcne
Methvlene Chloride
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Total Xvlene Isomers
Trichloroethcne
Vmyl Chloride
cis-1.3-Dichloropronene
trans-1.3-Dichloropropene
Ra!!i21!~1b:, !11Ci11J
Carbon-14
Tritium
. TABLE 2.1
Groundwater Analytical Results
For Each of Twenty Wells
GW-15 GW-IB GW-17
SHAU.OW SHAU.OW SHAU.OW
<5 <500 <0.5
<10 <1000 <1
<10 <1000 <1
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
12 ' 2900 0.7
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
3-0 1600 0.4
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
220 20000 4.2
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500. <0.5
22 4600 1.0
<5 <500 <I
<5 · <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
7.6 350 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<5 <500 <0.5
<500 <500 <500
<500 <500 <500
GW-20 GW-09 GW-16
SHAU.OW SHALLOW SHAU.OW
<0.5 <I <I
<1 <1 <I
<I <I <I
<0.5 <I <1
<0.5 <I <I
<0.5 <1 <1
<0.5 <I <1
<0.5 <1 <1
<0.5 <5 <5
<0.5 <5 <5
<0.5 <5 <5
<0.5 <10 <10
<0.5 1.1 <I
<0.5 <1 <I
<0.5 <l <I
<0.5 <I <I
<0.5 <2 <2
<0.5 <1 <I
<0.5 <1 <I
<0.5 <I <1
25 5.5 1.8
<0.5 <I <I
<0.5 <I <I
<0.5 <I <1
<0.5 2.2 1.7
<I <I <I
<0.5 <I <I
<0.5 <1 <1
<0.5 <3 <3
<0.5 <I <I
<0.5 <I <1
<0.5 <I <1
<0.5 <I <1
<500 -

-
<500 --
Note: Existing monitoring wells were analyzed for volatiles and radiation, only. Newly constructed wells were anal: for the T AUTCL list of parameters and radiation.
I Brown and Caldwell
G:\720J.7200T4-I.CJa.S Page 9 of9
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2.2
Minimum and Maximum
Groundwater Analytical Results For Twenty Wells
--
Parameters
Volatiles /ug/L}
1,1,1-Trichlorethane
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2-Trichlorethane
I, 1-Dichloroethanc
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (Total)
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
4-methyl-2-oentanone
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobcnzene
Ch!oroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
Ethyl benzene
Methvlene Chloride
Stvrcne
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Total Xylene Isomers
Trichloroethene
Vinvl Chloride
cis-1,3-Dichloroorooene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
S~miv!lll!lili::i <m~II.l
1,2,4-Trichlorobcnzene
1,2-Dichlorobcnzene
1,3-Dichlorobcnzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,2'-oxvbis (1--Chloroorooane)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2.4,6-Trichloroohenol
Brown and Caldwell
G:\7200.nOOT~I J.xt.s
Number· Number
of ' of Detectable
Analyses Results
21 3
21 4
21 ' 3
21 3
21 3
21 1
21 3
21 6
21 2
21 2
21. 4
21 5
21 10
21 6
21 2
21 0
21 0
21 9
21 5
21 0
21 14
21 0
21 3
21 3
21 11
21 0
21 6
21 4
21 3
21 9
21 1
21 0
21 0
10 0
10 0
10 0
10 ,O
10 'O
10 0
10 .o
Page 1 of4
Minimum Maximum
of Detectable of Detectable
Results Results
18 30
5.8 200
16 140
20 39
17 23
2.5 2.5
2.8 31
1.5 900
1,100 1,300
5.3 5.6
3 110
25 16,000
0.7 14,000
3.7 280
35 36
------
0.4 6,400
0.56 150
--
1.8 63,000
--.
0.7 3.5
40 89
1 18,000
--
1.2 5,000
1.3 1,500
350 700
3.4 1,300
3.7 3.7
----
---
------------------
Frequency
of
Detection
14%
19%
14%
14%
14%
5%
14%
29%
10%
10%
19%
24%
48%
29%
10%
0%
0%
43%
24%.
0%
67%
0%
14%
14%
52%
0%
29%
19%
14%
43%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2.2
· Minimum and Maximum Groundwater Analytical Results For Twenty Wells
Parameters
2,4-Dichloroohenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2-Chloronaohthalene
. 2-Chloroohenol
2-Methyl-4,6--dinitroohenol
2-Methvlnaohthalene
2-Methvlohenol (o-Cresol)
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitroohenol
3-3"-Dichlorobenzidine
3-Nitroaniline
4-Bromophenylphenvlether
4-Chloro-3-methvlohenol
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chloroohenvlohenvlether
4-Methylphenol (o-Cresol)
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroohenol
Acenaohthene
Acenaohthylene
Aothracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(alovrene
Benzo(b )fluoranthene
Benzo(g,hJ)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis(2-ehloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-<:hloroethvl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)ohthalate
Butvlben7Vlohthalate
Carbazole
Chrvsene
Di-n-ocrvlohthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Dibutvlohthalate
Diethylphthalate
Dimethylphthalate
Auoranthene
Auorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Brown and Caldwell
G:\nOO.nOOT4-IJXI..S
Number
of
Analvses
10
10
10
10
10
IO
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
IO
10'
10
10
10
10
10
10 '
IO
IO
10
IO
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
IO
10
IO
IO
IO
IO
10
Number Minimum Maximum
of Detectable of Detectable of Detectable
Results Results Results
0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --0
0 --0 --0 --0 --0 --1 41 41
0 -
0 --0 --0 -0 --0 --0 --
i 0 --' 0 --0 --0 --0 ---
' Page 2 of 4
Frequency
of
Detection
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%.
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
I:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2.2
Minimum and Maximum
Groundwater Analytical Results For Twenty Wells
... . . -.... -..
Parameters
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocvcloocntadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(l ,2,3-c,d)ovrene
Isopborone
N-Nitrosodi-n-proovlamine
N-Nitrosodiohenvlamine
Nanbthalene
Nitrobenzene
Pentachloroohenol ·
Pbenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrcne
Pesticides (ug/Ll
Aldrin
Aroclor IO I 6
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
BHC, aloha isomer
BHC, beta isomer -
BHC, delta isomer
BHC, gamma isomer (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I ·
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin ketone
Endrin aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heotachlor enoxide
Methoxvchlor
Toxanbene
a-Chlordane
g-Chlordane
o,o'-DDD
p.p'-DDE
p,p'-DDT
Brown and Caldwell
G:\7200.7200T~13.XU
Number
of
Analyses
10
IO
IO
IO
IO
IO
IO
IO
IO
10
IO
IO
IO
10
10
IO
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
IO
10
10
10
Number Minimum Maximum
of Detectable of Detectable of Detectable
Results Results Results
0 --0 --
0 --: 0 --1 570 570
0 --
0 --2 29 31
0 --0 --
0 --
0 --
0 --
0 -

-
0 --
0 --
0 -

-
0 --
0 ---
0 --
: 0 --0 --
0 --
0 --
1 0.016 0.016
1 0.013 0.013
0 --
0 --
0 --
0 --
0 --: 0 --0 --0 -0 --:o --1 0.013 0.013
1 0.041 0.041
0 ---0 --
0 --
Page3 of4
Frequency
of
Detection
0%
0%
0%
0%
IO%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
. 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
10%
0%
0%
0%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2.2
Minimum and Maximum
Groundwater Analytical Results For Twenty Wells
. ·····--· -·
Parameters
M~tal~; Blllie fl!rametec; (m!llL;*l
f'vanidc
nH (*standard units)
Aluminum
Antimonv
Arsenic
Barium
Bervllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Con~
Iron
Lead
Maonesium
Man~anese
Mercnrv
"Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
B,adi2activ~ (lll:i/L)
Carbon-14
Tritium
Note: Existing monitoring wells were anal:
for the T AL/TCL list of parame1
Brown and Caldwell
G :\72.00iTIOOT ~ lJXLS
Number Number
of of Detectable
Analvses Results
'
10 0
10 10
10 9
10 0
' 10 1
10 3
. 10 0
10 0
' 10 8
; 10 2
10 3
10 6
10 8
10 3
10 2
10 8
10 0
10 1
10 4
10 0
10 0
10 7
10 0
10 0
10 . 7
19 1
· 19 3
I
Page4 of 4
Minimum Maximum
of Detectable of Detectable
Results Results
6.1 II
0.27 3.9
--
0.11 0.11
0.9 0.96
---
6.2 65
0.017 0.02
0.069 0.089
0.046 0.078
0.43 3.3
0.021 0.031
5.3 5.6
0.028 20
0_073 0.073
7.1 31
--
--
7.8 23
--
- -
0.025 0.66
522 522
711 6000
Frequency
of
Detection
0%
100%
90%
0%
10%
30%
0%
0%
80%
20%
30%
60%
80%
30%
20% .
80%
0%
10%
40%
0%
0%
70%
0%
0%
70%
5%
16%