NCD003200383_20020912_Koppers Co. Inc._FRBCERCLA RA_Second Quarter 2002 Groundwater Monitoring Report-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
September 12, 2002
Ms. Beverly Hudson
Remedial Project Manager
USEPA-Region IV
North Superfund Remedial Branch
Waste Management Division
I 00 Alabama Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
The RETEC Group. Inc.
1822 E. NC Highway 54. Suite ll\.t
Durham, NC 27713
[phone] Phone
[phone] Fa,
www.retec.com
I ---/ 1-.·1 /, . I ,
/ / ' I , I
Ii) ,1_· SEr,
I -' ' . /·
, l
:. _,_.
RE: Second Quarter 2002 Groundwater Monitoring Report for the
Former Koppers Company Site, Morrisville, North Carolina
RETEC Project No.: BEAZ7-03624-103
Dear Ms. Hudson:
RETEC North Carolina, Inc. (RETEC), on behalf of Beazer East, Inc. (Beazer), hereby submits
the results of the second quarter 2002 groundwater monitoring event at the former Koppers
Company Site in Morrisville, North Carolina (Site). This report documents the field and
laboratory results of the groundwater monitoring event performed on May 28, 2002.
Groundwater Monitoring Program-Second Quarter 2002
Based on the Proposed Remedial Action Groundwater Monitoring Program requirements, the
second quarter 2002 monitoring event included the:
• Gauging of 50 monitoring wells (Figure I): 35 on-site wells and 15 off-site wells
• Sampling of four on-site wells: C-01B, C-14B, C-29B, and PW-01
Although wells M-04A and C-14A are usually included in the groundwater sampling program,
RETEC found that the volume of water present in these wells was not sufficient to generate a
sample.
Groundwater Elevation and Direction of Flow
Groundwater elevations for the A-, B-, and C-zone wells, as measured on May 28, 2002, are
presented in Table I. The groundwater elevations presented in Table 1 were used to construct
the A-B-and C-zone groundwater potentiometric surface maps shown in Figures 2 through 4.
Please note, however, that well C-0IB and well C-10B have historically had widely divergent
groundwater elevations compared to adjacent B-zone wells. These two wells are 35 to 95 feet
deeper than the deepest B-zone well. The intervals screened and the historic groundwater
elevations measured in these wells indicate that they are monitoring a zone that does not
communicate with the rest of the B-zone wells. Due to this lack of communication, well C-01B
and well C-IOB will continue to be gauged, but will not be included in the dataset used to
determine the potentiometric surface for the B-zone (Figure 3).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Beverly Hudson
September 12, 2002
Page 2
Figures 2 and 3 show the cone of depression that exists around the pumping well (PW-01) and
indicate that, outside of the zone of influence, groundwater flow is generally to the northeast and
south-southwest. The high variability in the C-zone groundwater elevations indicates that these
wells arc screened in isolated fracture zones within the bedrock, as seen on Figure 4.
Phenolic Analytical Results
Each groundwater sample was analyzed for pentachlorophenol and 2,4-dichlorophcnol using the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8270C-Select Ion
Monitoring. RETEC personnel validated the groundwater analytical results and applied the
necessary data qualifiers, as summarized in Table 2. We also provide a complete copy of the
laboratory analytical results in Appendix A.
The record of decision for this Site requires that groundwater meet the following cleanup
standards:
• I microgram per liter (µg/L) for pentachlorophenol
• 20 µg/L for 2,4-dichlorophenol
As shown in Table 2, pentachlorophenol was detected at a diluted concentration in groundwater
sampled from wells C-29B and PW-01. Both of these pentachlorophenol detections exceed the
pentachlorophenol cleanup standard of I µg/L; however, 2,4-dichlorophenol was not detected in
any of the samples analyzed during this event.
In accordance with the USEPA-approved Groundwater Monitoring Program, RETEC will
continue to collect quarterly samples from all wells with pentachlorophenol and/or 2,4-
dichlorophenol results above the specified cleanup levels. This sampling will continue until the
concentrations of pentachlorophenol and 2,4-dichlorophenol meet the cleanup levels for four
consecutive sampling events.
Since pentachlorophenol was detected in groundwater sampled from C-29B and PW-01, these
wells will be sampled as part of the third quarter monitoring event.
Pentachlorophenol was not detected in well C-14B for the fourth consecutive quarter; therefore,
C-14B will not be sampled in the third quarter and will be placed on the annual monitoring
schedule.
Also during the third quarter of 2002, RETEC will attempt to sample wells C-14A and M-04A
for pentachlorophenol and 2,4-dichlorophenol. Although these wells are on the quarterly
sampling schedule, they were dry and RETEC was unable to sample them during the last
monitoring event.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Beverly Hudson
September 12, 2002
Page 3
Dioxin and Furan Analytical Results
Dioxin and furan sampling by USEPA Method 8290 occurs on a semiannual basis in a subset of
wells. In the second quarter of 2002, RETEC collected dioxin and furan samples from wells that
had concentrations of pentachlorophenol at or above the specified cleanup levels during the
previous sampling event, or wells with two or more quarterly pentachlorophenol detections in the
previous four quarters. Therefore, the second quarter 2002 first semiannual dioxin and furan
sampling event included wells C-29B and PW-01, and well C-0IB (which was dry in the
previous quarter and could not be sampled). RETEC personnel validated the groundwater
analytical results and applied the necessary data qualifiers, as summarized in Table 2. Table 3
shows the detected concentrations of dioxins and furans with their calculated toxicity equivalent
quotient (TEQ) concentration. The TEQ concentration is calculated by multiplying the
concentration of each dioxin or furan by its respective toxicity equivalent factor. The resulting
TEQ concentrations are then summed to determine the total TEQ.
The record of decision for this Site requires that groundwater meet the following cleanup
standards:
• 30 (picogram per liter) pg/L for dioxins and furans
As presented in Tables 2 and 3, the dioxins OCDD and total HpCDD were detected in
groundwater sampled from well C-0IB. No dioxins or furans were detected in wells C-29B or
PW-01. As shown in Table 3, the C-0lB dioxin detection did not exceed the associated cleanup
standard.
In agreement with the USEPA-approved Groundwater Monitoring Program, we will collect
semiannual dioxin and furan samples from all wells that have concentrations of
pentachlorophenol at or above the specified cleanup levels during the previous sampling event
or wells with two or more quarterly pentachlorophenol detections in the previous year.
Therefore, depending on the outcome of the third quarter 2002 sampling event, the next dioxin
and furan sampling in the fourth quarter of 2002 may include wells C-29B, and PW-01. This list
will be reviewed and revised in the Third Quarter 2002 Groundwater Monitoring Report.
During the third quarter of 2002, RETEC will attempt to sample well C-14A for dioxins and
furans. Although this well is on the quarterly sampling schedule, it was dry and RETEC was
unable to sample it during the last monitoring event.
Operational Summary
The groundwater extraction system is currently pumping at its optimum. The aquifer's low yield
will not support a pumping rate greater than 2 gallons per minute, nor will the low yield of the
aquifer support the "pulsing" of the system.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Beverly Hudson
September 12, 2002
Page4
Quarterly review of the groundwater analytical results indicates that the concentrations of
constituents of interest arc decreasing in groundwater collected from the three remaining wells
with groundwater impact. Monitoring will continue in order to determine the rate at which the
levels of impact arc decreasing.
If you have any questions regarding these results, please call Michael Helbling of Beazer at (412)
208-8867 or Rita Bauer at [phone].
Sincerely,
RETEC North Carolina, Inc.
~~u-c!'o
Stefanie D. Young
Environmental Scientist
Enclosures
Rita M. Bauer
Groundwater Sampling Program Manager
cc: D. Mattison-North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
M. Helbling-Beazer East, Inc.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tables
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 1 Groundwater Elevations
Second Quarter 2002
Top of Casing
Well ID Gauging Date Elevation
{feet msl)
C-01A 28-Mav-02 383.06
C-02A 28-Mav-02 380.76
C-03A 28-Mav-02 380.21
C-04A 28-Mav-02 385.31
C-05A 28-Mav-02 386.59
C-06A 28-Mav-02 383.90
C-07A 28-Mav-02 374.30
C-08A 28-Mav-02 376.34
C-09A 28-Mav-02 372.98
C-10A 28-Mav-02 373.88
C-11A 28-Mav-02 363.28
C-12A 28-Mav-02 375.00
C-13A 28-Mav-02 367.31
C-14A 28-Mav-02 371.13
C-15A 28-Mav-02 357.08
C-25A 28-Mav-02 365.52
C-26A 28-Mav-02 382.12
C-27A 28-Mav-02 372.10
C-28A 28-Mav-02 372.40
C-30A 28-Mav-02 379.11
C-31A 28-Mav-02 379.98
C-33A 28-Mav-02 354.37
M-04 28-Mav-02 368.83
C-018 28-Mav-02 383.35
C-028 28-Mav-02 381.72
C-038 28-Mav-02 380.69
C-098 28-Mav-02 374.76
C-108 28-Mav-02 373.58
C-118 28-Mav-02 363.28
C-128 28-Mav-02 375.75
C-138 28-Mav-02 367.02
C-148 28-Mav-02 371.66
C-158 28-Mav-02 357.62
C-258 28-Mav-02 364.85
C-268 28-Mav-02 382.21
C-278 28-Mav-02 372.01
C-288 28-Mav-02 373.07
C-298 28-Mav-02 369.00
C-338 28-Mav-02 352.84
C-348 28-Mav-02 376.31
PW-01 28-Mav-02 371.29
C-09C 28-Mav-02 374.34
C-12C 28-Mav-02 376.11
C-16C 28-Mav-02 368.37
C-19C 28-Mav-02 365.84
C-20C 28-Mav-02 378.17
C-21C 28-Mav-02 361.04
C-22C 28-Mav-02 355.24
C-32C 28-Mav-02 368.88
' C-33C 28-Mav-02 353.54
C-34C 28-Mav-02 376.39
Notes:
msl • mean sea level
NA Indicates not apollcable
Depth to Groundwater
Groundwater Elevation
{feet) {feet msl)
25.07 357.99
27.10 353.66
20.77 359.44
19.38 365.93
19.60 366.99
15.53 368.37
11.25 363.05
32.13 344.21
14.07 358.91
20.31 353.57
10.73 352.55
17.60 357.40
10.51 356.80
28.98 342.15
6.30 350.78
21.02 344.50
Orv Orv
21.21 350.89
14.95 357.45
26.82 352.29
23.27 356.71
10.20 344.17
16.10 352.73
95.32 288.03
11.20 370.52
24.40 356.29
20.96 353.80
102.85 270.73
11.08 352.20
16.10 359.65
7.07 359.95
29.07 342.59
3.21 354.41
20.52 344.33
32.05 350.16
36.50 335.51
11.68 361.39
33.25 335.75
7.62 345.22
17.36 358.95
NA NA
16.55 357.79
79.10 297.01
17.56 350.81
14.31 351.53
28.27 349.90
31.25 329.79
6.31 348.93
28.62 340.26
14.52 339.02
18.02 358.37
----------
Table 2 Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results
Second Quarter 2002
Sample Location
Samele Date
Method 8270C SIM
2,4-Dichloroohenol
Pentachloroohenol
Method 8290
1,2,3,4,6 7,8-HPCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HPCDF
1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HPCDF
1,2,3,4,7 8-HXCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3, 7 ,8,9-HXCDD
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HXCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PECDD
1,2,3, 7,8-PECDF
2,3.4,6, 7 ,8-HXCDF
2,3.4,7,8-PECDF
2,3.7 8-TCDD
2,3, 7 ,8-TCDF
OCDD
OCDF
Total HPCDD
Total HPCDF
Total HXCDD
Total HXCDF
Total PECDD
Total PECDF
Total TCDD
Total TCDF
Notes:
~ -plcograms per liter
µg/L -micrograms per liter
NA indicates not applicable
Units
I ua/1
I U!lfl
P!l/L
nn,
0G
on,
oa/1
OQ/L
nn,
nn
00
nn
nnn
nnn
Oa/L
"'" OQ/
nnJ
nail
OQ/1
Patt
oa/1
P!l/L
nail
OQ/L
P!l/L
nn/1
D indicates compound was diluted
J indicates estimated result
ROD
Groundwater Standard*
20
1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
U Indicates compound was analyzed for, but not detected
•Record of Decision Groundwater Cleanup Standard
C-01B
5/28/2002
0.22 U
1.1 U
20 U
1.6 U
1.7 U
2 U
1.6 U
2.2 U
1.6 U
2 U
1.7 U
3.4 U
1.8 U
1.7 U
1.8 U
1.6 U
1.2 U
360
7.9 U
29
3.7 U
2.2 U
1.7 U
3.4 U
1.9 U
1.6 U
1.2 U
---------
.RETEC
C-14B C-29B PW-01 PW-01 -DUP EB-01 -EB
5/28/2002 5/28/2002 5/28/2002 5/28/2002 5/28/2002
0.22 U I 0.2 U I 0.2 U 0.22 U 0.24 U
1.1 U I 41 D 18 D 20 D 1.2 U
NA 12 U 3.3 U 3.2 U 5.6 U
NA 2.7 U 2.8 U 2 U 1.3 U
NA 1.5 U 3.2 U 2.4 U 1.5 U
NA 1.8 U 3.4 U 2.8 U 1.7 U
NA 1.1 U 2.5 U 2 U 1.1 U
NA 1.9 U 3.7 U 3.1 U 1.8 U
NA 1.1 U 2.5 U 2 U 1.1 U
NA 1.7 U 3.3 U 2.7 U 1.6 U
NA 1.2 U 2.7 U 2.2 U 1.2 U
NA 2.7 U 7.2 U 4.6 U . 2.6 U
NA 1.6 U 4.3 U 2.8 U 1.6 U
NA 1.2 U 2.7 U 2.2 U 1.2 U
NA 1.6 U 4.4 U 2.8 U 1.6 U
NA 1.4 U 5.2 U 3 U 1.9 U
NA 1.1 U 2.9 U 1.7 U 1.0 U
NA 99,u·-14 U 21 U 54 J
NA 6.1 U 4.4 U 3.5 U 3.8 U
NA 12. U 3.3 U 3.2 U 6.4 U
NA 3.7 U 3.2 U 2.4 U 2.7 U
NA 2.2 U 3.7 U 3.1 U 1.8 U
NA 1.2 U 2.7 U 2.2 U 1.2 U
NA 2.7 U 7.2 U 6.4 U 2.6 U
NA 1.8 U 5 U 2.8 U 1.9 U
NA 1.4 u 5.2 U 3 U 1.9 U
NA 1.1 U 2.9 U 1.7 U 1.0 U
------------
Table 3 Calculation of Toxicity Equivalent Quotients for Dioxins/Furans
Second Quarter 2002
Analyte
1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8-HPCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HPCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HPCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HXCDD
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HXCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PECDD
1,2,3,7,8-PECDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HXCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PECDF
2,3,7,8-TCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
OCDD
OCDF
Total HPCDD
Total HPCDF
Total HXCDD
Total HXCDF
Total PECDD
Total PECDF
TotalTCDD
Total TCDF
Totals:
Notes:
pg/I.. -picograms per liter
NA indicates not applicable
TEF
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.05
0.1
0.5
1
0.1
0.001
0.001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TEF • Toxicity Equivalent Factor
TEO -Toxicity Equivalent Quotient
Units
nm
nni
DC
nc
DC
nnn
P!l/1
00/l
P!l/L
nnl
Oat
nnl
nnn
nn11
nnn
nn11
nnn
nnt
nn/
nnt
nn/
nor
nn/
DQ/1
oa/L
ROD C-01B
Groundwater Standard* Result TEO
NA 20 U 0
NA 1.6 U 0
NA 1.7 U 0
NA 2.0 U 0
NA 1.6 U 0
NA 2.2 U 0
NA 1.6 U 0
NA 2.0 U 0
NA 1.7 U 0
NA 3.4 U 0
NA 1.8 U 0
NA 1.7 U 0
NA 1.8 U 0
NA 1.6 U 0
NA 1.2 U 0
NA 360 0.36
NA 7.9 U 0
NA 29 0
NA 3.7 U 0
NA 2.2 U 0
NA 1.7 U 0
NA 3.4 U 0
NA 1.9 U 0
NA 1.6 U 0
NA 1.2 U 0
30 I I 0.36
Laboratory results that were U-qualified (not detected) were assigned a value of O for this calculation.
·Record of Decision Groundwater Cleanup Standard
C-29B
Result
12 U
2.7 U
1.5 U
1.8 U
1.1 u
1.9 U
1.1 U
1.7 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.6 U
1.2 U
1.6 U
1.4 U
1.1 u
99 U
6.1 U
12 U
3.7 U
2.2 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.8 U
1.4 U
1.1 U
I
-------
.RETEC
PW-01 PW-01 • CUP
TEO Result TEO Result TEO
0 3.3 U 0 3.2 U 0
0 2.8 U 0 2 U 0
0 3.2 U 0 2.4 U 0
0 3.4 U 0 2.8 U 0
0 2.5 U 0 2 U 0
0 3.7 U 0 3.1 U 0
0 2.5 U 0 2 U 0
0 3.3 U 0 2.7 U 0
0 2.7 U 0 2.2 U 0
0 7.2 U 0 4.6 U 0
0 4.3 U 0 2.8 U 0
0 2.7 U 0 2.2 U 0
0 4.4 U 0 2.8 U 0
0 5.2 U 0 3 U 0
0 2.9 U 0 1.7 U 0
0 14 U 0 21 U 0
0 4.4 U 0 3.5 U 0
0 3.3 U 0 3.2 U 0
0 3.2 U 0 2.4 U 0
0 3.7 U 0 3.1 U 0
0 2.7 U 0 2.2 U 0
0 7.2 U 0 6.4 U 0
0 5 U 0 2.8 U 0
0 5.2 U 0 3 U 0
0 2.9 U 0 1.7 U 0
0 I 0 0 I
I
I
I
••
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• • •
I
•
I
I
Figures
I
I
I
I
I
I ♦c21c
i
I
I C
a
a
I
I ~
f
I ~
E
le
)
N 0 I 0 s
' • 0 . I • 0
0 a u ~ ~ ~
I i
i m ~
t
I < • 0
~
' m N
I ► < i ~ /
I i .. • • 2 ~
I 0 ~ u / ~
D [l
0
D
...oih..C0.3A TcoJs
♦ C16C
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CJJA -11· C338
♦C26A C268
~OBA
. --------== -. -
D
I
(
I /
I '-·7
I I
0 I I
I
/ 1/
I(
CZS~C258
I 0
\
/
'-//'--. --r}/
CEMETERY~
I
GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
BEAZER EAST, INC.
BEAV-03624-103
CATE: 09/12/02 DRWN: CC/OUR F"ILE: J624CH01
/
/
200
Q
LEGEND:
MONITORING WELL
RAltROAD TRACKS
FENCELINE
DRAINAGE/STREAM
PROPERTY BOUNDARY -BEAZER
EAST, INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY -UNIT
STRUCTURES INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY -UNKNOWN
~
o
SCALE, 1 "=400'
400
SITE MAP
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
l..,lYOUT: SITE MAP FIGURE: 1
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
Ii
I
0
I ~ 0
0 Q
0 D
E § • E 0 • C
'c'] [] 00
N 0 I 0 s
"-m 0
~
I i " 0 • u ~
C09A 4-
358.91
~ /
I ~ • m 0
0
~
~ < I • 0
~
' m N
I ► < ,
/ • ~ /
f,
I .•
0 • •
• RETEC 2 :?).
I 0 0 < ~
"
0
c:==i
C:::J =
()
D
9
/
/
=
C33A
.344. 17
4-
I
;348----
1
/lJ JSO---.l..2-/
I
I ~52~---:~~::;:~
C11A
352.
14A1;b 4.\li,.
D
(
I / -._,
I 7 ' I -._, I
0 ·-J I
I
GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
BEAZER EAST, INC.
BEAD-03624-103
DATE: 09/12/02 ORWN: CC/OUR FILE: J624CH02
/
/
Cl
LEGEND:
+ MONITORING WELL
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR
368.SJ GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
ATWELl,_(FEEH.\SL)
(361. 77) TOTAL WELL DEPTH
~
200 0 400
~
SCALL , --=•oo·
A-ZONE GROUNDWATER CONTOURS
MAY28,2002
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
LAYOUT: A-ZONE FIGURE: 2
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I =
II 1 0
N 0
I 0
$ ;;.
0
~ I i ..;
0 r 0 ~ 0 ~ /
I ~ • 0 ~ ~
~
I < ~ 0
~
' ~
I ' < t ~
I i .,
0 ~
~
.RETEC i 0 /
D ~ ;l
.::
D
a
a D 0
C09B :_11·
353.80
0 Q
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '!,~'-',
I
I
C33B
~45.22
.65
0 :fl
~
0 o /~ L'
,,,,1/
// _/j
-I
I
I
GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
BEAZER EAST, INC.
BEAZ7--03624-103
OAT[: 09/ 12/02 ORWN: CC/OUR FIL(: J624CH0J
/
LEGEND:
MONITORING WELL
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR
J53.7J GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
AT WELL (FEET MSL)
NOTE:
WELLS C-018 AND C-108 NOT USED IN CONTOURING.
0
<00
SCALE: 1 "=400'
8-ZONE GROUNDWATER CONTOURS
MAY28, 2002
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
LAYOUT: 8-ZQN[ FIGURE: 3
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
Ii
I
I
I K 9
N 0
I 2 ;:,
'-~
~
I i .. 0 I ~ N ~ ~
I l
i m iii
" < I " 0
§
N
' ~
I ' < f ~ ~ /
I -! 0 " ' ~ '.;'
I g < ~
"'
-...-
~ C21C 329. 79
"' "'
---
/
/
/
C19C 1/-351.53
.RETEC
-
"-.
0
0
0
-
□
0
\
\ ,,., C20C
T349_9Q
-----------
0
---
GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
BEAZER EAST, INC.
BEAV-03624-103
DAT(: 09/12/02 DRWN: CC/OUR FILE: .3624CH04
/
LEGEND:
-~-MONITORING WELL
INFERRED GROUNOWA TER CONTOUR
JSJ.7.3 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
AT WELL (FEET MSL)
200 0
SCALE: 1 "=400'
' C22C 348.93
400
C.ZONE GROUNDWATER CONTOURS
MAY 28, 2002
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
LAYOUT: C-ZONE FIGURE:4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix A
Second Quarter 2002 Analytical Results
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Final Data Evaluation Report
Site: Beazer/Raleigh
Program/Event: CERCLA Groundwater Monitoring/ 02-02
Laboratory: Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc. -Pittsburgh and
West Sacramento
Laboratory Project Numbers: C2E290214, G2E290199,
G2F240172
Analyses: Pentachlorophenol and 2,4-Dichlorophenol by SW-
846 Method 8270C SIM, Dioxins and Fu rans by SW-
846 Method 8290
Evaluator: Gretchen A. Phipps
Date: July 23, 2002
The Raleigh Q2-02 data reports from Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc. were evaluated
using the USEPA National Functional Guidelines and USEPA method specifications.
Each issue requiring comment and/or data qualification is addressed below. Qualified
results are listed in bolded text.
Sample Collection, Receipt, and Log-In
Sample Collection:. Wells C-14A and M-04 were dry. Samples could not be
collected for these wells.
Sample Receipt: Samples were received by the laboratory within the optimal
temperature range of 2-6° C.
One of the equipment blank (EBO I) bottles for dioxins and furans analyses was
received broken.
The dioxins and furans samples for well C29B were labeled with the collection
time of 15:20. The COC recorded a sample time of 14:40. The COC collection
time was used to log-in the samples.
Heaz.edRaleiMh
Q2-02
Client Work Prodflct
Private and Co11ji'denria!
II Pentachlorophenol and 2,4-Dichlorophenol by SW-846 Method
8270C SIM
Dilutions/Reporting Limits: Sample PWO I was analyzed at a secondary four-fold
dilution because pentachlorophenol exceeded the calibration range of the
instrument. For this reason, the pentachlorophenol result from the original
analyses was qualified "E" by the laboratory. The pentachlorophenol result from
the secondary dilution was acceptable and must be used.
Sample PWO I-DUPO I was analyzed at a secondary two-fold dilution because
pentachlorophenol exceeded the calibration range of the instrument. For this
reason, the pentachlorophenol result from the original analyses was qualified "E"
by the laboratory. The pentachlorophenol result from the secondary dilution was
acceptable and must be used.
Sample C29B was analyzed at a secondary ten-fold dilution because
pentachlorophenol exceeded the calibration range of the instrument. For this
reason, the pentachlorophenol result from the original analyses was qualified "E"
by the laboratory. The pentachlorophenol result from the secondary dilution was
acceptable and must be used.
Due to insufficient sample volume, samples PWOI-DUPOI, C 14B, C29B and the
equipment blank (EBO I) were extracted using smaller sample aliquots. This
caused the reporting limits to be slightly elevated. There were no positive hits
(no signal) between the required method detection limits and the elevated
reporting limits.
Matrix Spike Recoveries: Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD)
analyses were conducted on sample PWO 1. The MS and MSD recoveries for
pentachlorophenol were out-of-control due to the high concentration of
pentachlorophenol in sample PWO I. Validation action was not required.
Ill Dioxins and Furans by SW-846 Method 8290
Sample Identification: The preliminary results for the equipment blank, EBO!,
had high positive results for Total HpCDD and OCDD. There was concern that
the equipment blank was switched with an environmental sample at the
laboratory. The results for PWOI, PWOI-DUPOI, and C29B were consistent with
historical data. Historical data for well CO I B was unavailable as the well is
typically dry. Therefore, it was requested that the laboratory re-extract and
reanalyze the equipment blank and COIB. However, since one of the bottles
containing the equipment blank was received broken, there wa~ insufficient
F:BEAZ7-03624/DataEvalReport_2002/RA_Q2-02 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Beazer/Raleigh
Q2-/J2
Client Work Prod11c1
P1frate and Cm1jidc11rial
IV
volume to re-extract the equipment blank. The laboratory re-extracted and
reanalyzed sample CO I B. The re-extraction was conducted three days outside the
holding time. The results of the re-extraction were submitted in SDG
G2F240 I 72. The re-extraction results for CO 18 were similar to the original
results of EBO! indicating that the laboratory switched the two samples during
analysis. The laboratory agreed that there was a probable sample switch or
labeling error. The data validator switched the EB0I and C0IB results. The
C0IB results in SDG G2F240172 were used for confirmation only.
Blank Contamination: OCDD was detected in the equipment blank at a
concentration of 54 pg/L. An action level equal to five times the concentration
(270 pg/L) was used to evaluate samples for field contamination. Validation
action was not required for nondetect results or positive results greater than the
blank action level. The positive OCDD result reported for sample C29B was
qualified as undetected, "U," because of field contamination.
Field Duplicate Samples
Samples PW0 I and PW0I-DUP0 I were the primary and field duplicate samples
collected for this sampling event. All positive results are presented in the table
below. No data qualifications are required based on the relative percent difference
(%RPO) of field duplicate sample data. However, the positive results are
presented in the table below to evaluate precision and sample homogeneity. An
%RPO greater than the advisory limit of 30% is an indication of sample
heterogeneity with respect to that compound, poor field precision and/or poor
laboratory precision. Field and laboratory precision were acceptable.
Beazer I Raleigh
02-02 Field Duplicate Comparison
Parameter PW01 PW01-DUP01 RPD (%)
Pentachloronhenol 18 11n/L 20 un/L 11
Attachments:
Qualifications Summary
F:BEAZ7-03624/DataEva/Report_2002/RA_Q2-02 3
Sample
PW01
PW01
PW0-1-
PW01
PW01-DUP01
PW01-0UP01
PW01 DUP01
PW01-0UP01
C14B
C14B
C01B
C01B
EB01
EB01
C29B
C29B
G200
C29B
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 OUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 OUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 OUP
PW-01 DUP
Qualifications Summary
Beazer, Raleigh
02-02
Analyte Result Units
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 0.2 UG/L
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 0.8 UG/L
~ENGh 4a YG/b
PENTACHLOROPHENOL 18 UG/L
2,4-DlCHLOROPHENOL 0.22 UG/L
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 0.43 UG/L
PE;MT"CHLGRG~ :la YG/b
PENTACHLOROPHENOL 20 UG/L
2,4-0ICHLOROPHENOL 0.22 UG/L
PENTACHLOROPHENOL 1.1 UG/L
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 0.22 UG/L
PENTACHLOROPHENOL 1.1 UG/L
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 0.24 UG/L
PENTACHLOROPHENOL 1.2 UG/L
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 0.2 UG/L
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 2 UG/L
PE;M+AGHbG~GPH!;;:~IGb -1--1-0 YG/b
PENTACHLOROPHENOL 41 UG/L
2,3, 7 ,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXlN 5.2 PG/L
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 3.3 PG/L
TOTAL PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 5 PG/L
OCTACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 14 PG/L
TOTAL HEXCHLOROOIBENZO-P-OIOXINS 3.7 PG/L
1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HEPT ACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 3.3 PG/L
TOTAL PENTACHLORODIBENZO·P•DIOXINS 7.2 PG/L
TOT AL HEPT ACHLORODIBENZO-P-OIOXINS . 3.3 PG/L
TOTAL HEPTACHLOROOIBENZOFURANS 3.2 PG/L
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 4.4 PG/L
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD 3.4 PG/L
1,2,3,7 ,8-PENT ACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 7.2 PG/L
TOTAL TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 5.2 PG/L
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.9 PG/L
1,2,3,4, 7 ,8,9-HEPT ACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 3.2 PG/L
TOTAL HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 2.7 PG/L
TOTAL TETRACHLOROOIBENZOFURANS 2.9 PG/L
2,3,4,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 4.4 PG/L
1,2,3,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 4.3 PG/L
1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.5 PG/L
1,2,3,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO·P-DIOXIN 3.7 PG/L
2,3,4,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.7 PG/L
1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HEPT ACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.8 PG/L
1,2,3,4, 7 ,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.5 PG/L
1,2,3, 7 ,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.7 PG/L
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO·P-DIOXIN 3 PG/L
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLOROOIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 2.7 PG/L
TOTAL PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 2.8 PG/L
OCTACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 21 PG/L
TOTAL HEXCHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 3.1 PG/L
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO-P-OIOXIN 3.2 PG/L
TOT AL PENT ACHLORODIBENZ0-P-OIOX1NS 6.4 PG/L
TOTAL HEPTACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 3.2 PG/L
TOTAL HEPTACHLOROOIBENZOFURANS 2.4 PG/L
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 3.5 PG/L
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD 2.8 PG/L
Lab va11oat1on uetect1on
Qualifier Qualifier Limit
u 0.2
u 0.8
e -1-
4
u 0.22
u 0.43 e -14
2.2
u 0.22
u 1.1
u 0.22
u 1.1
u 0.24
u 1.2
u 0.2
u 2
e -1-
10
u 5.2
u 3.3
u 5
u 14
u 3.7
u 3.3
u 7.2
u 3.3
u 3.2
u 4.4
u 3.4
u 7.2
u 5.2
u 2.9
u 3.2
u 2.7
u 2.9
u 4.4
u 4.3
u 2.5
u 3.7
u 2.7
u 2.8
u 2.5
u 2.7
u 3
u 2.7
u 2.8
u 21
u 3.1
u 3.2
u 6.4
u 3.2
u 2.4
u 3.5
u 2.8
Dilution
1
4
-1-
4
1.08
2.16
-1--,W
2.16
1.09
1.09
1.1
1.1
1.19
1.19
1.02
10.2
4-,02
10.2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
PW-01 DUP
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
C-29B
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
Qualifications Summary
Beazer, Raleigh
Q2-02
. Analyte Result Units
1,2,3, 7 ,8-PENT ACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 4.6 PG/L
TOTAL TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 3 PG/L
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.7 PG/L
1,2,3,4, 7 ,8,9-HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.4 PG/L
TOT AL HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 2.2 PG/L
TOTAL TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 1.7 PG/L
2,3,4,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.8 PG/L
1,2,3, 7 ,8-PENT ACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.8 PG/L
1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2 PG/L
1,2,3,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 3.1 PG/L
2,3,4,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.2 PG/L
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2 PG/L
1,2,3,4,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2 PG/L
1,2,3, 7 ,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2.2 PG/L
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 1.4 PG/L
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 1.7 PG/L
TOTAL PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 1.8 PG/L
OCTACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 99 PG/L
TOTAL HEXCHLORODIBENZO-P-OIOXINS 2.2 PG/L
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 12 PG/L
TOTAL PENTACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 2.7 PG/L
TOTAL HEPTACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 12 PG/L
TOTAL HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 3.7 PG/L
OCT ACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 6.1 PG/L
1,2,3,4.7 .8-HXCDD 1.8 PG/L
1,2,3, 7,8-PENT ACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 2.7 PG/L
TOTAL TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 1.4 PG/L
2,3, 7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.1 PG/L
1,2,3,4, 7 ,8,9-HEPT ACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.5 PG/L
TOTAL HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 1.2 PG/L
TOTAL TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 1.1 PG/L
2,3,4,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.6 PG/L
1,2,3, 7 ,8-PENT ACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.6 PG/L
1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.1 PG/L
1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO-P-OIOXIN 1.9 PG/L
2,3,4,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.2 PG/L
1,2,3,4,6. 7 ,8-HEPT ACHLOROOIBENZOFURAN 2,7 PG/L
1,2,3,4, 7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.1 PG/L
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.2 PG/L
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 1.9 PG/L
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 1.6 PG/L
TOTAL PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 1.9 PG/L
OCTACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 54 PG/L
TOTAL HEXCHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 1.8 PG/L
1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HEPT ACHLORODIBENZO--P-DIOXIN 5.6 PG/L
TOT AL PENT ACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 2.6 PG/L
TOTAL HEPTACHLORODIBENZO-P-OIOXINS 6.4 PG/L
TOTAL HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 2.7 PG/L
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 3.8 PG/L
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD 1.7 PG/L
1,2,3, 7 ,8-PENT ACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 2.6 PG/L
TOT AL TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 1.9 PG/L
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1 PG/L
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.5 PG/L
Lab Va11aatIan Detection
Qualifier Qualifier Limit Dilution
u 4,6 1
u 3 1
u 1.7 1
u 2.4 1 I
u 2.2 1
u 1.7 1
u 2.8 1 ' u 2.8 1 I
u 2 1
u 3.1 1
u 2.2 1
u 2 1
u 2 1
u 2.2 1
u 1.4 1
u 1.7 ,
u 1.8 1
J u 1
u 2.2 1
u 12 1
u 2.7 1
u 12 1
u 3.7 1
u 6.1 1
u 1.8 1
u 2.7 1
u 1.4 1
u 1.1 1
u 1.5 1
u 1.2 1
u 1.1 1
u 1.6 1
u 1.6 1
u 1.1 1
u 1.9 1
u 1.2 1
u 2.7 1
u 1.1 1
u 1.2 1
u 1.9 1
u 1.6 1
u 1.9 1.
J 1
u 1.8 1
u 5.6 1
u 2.6 1
u 6.4 1
u 2.7 1
u 3.8 1
u 1.7 1
u 2.6 1
u 1.9 1
u 1 1
u 1.5 1
Sample
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
EB01
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018
C-018 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Qualifications Summary
Beazer, Raleigh
Q2-02
Analyte Result Units
TOTAL HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 1.2 PG/L
TOTAL TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 1 PG/L
2,3,4, 7 ,8-PENT ACHLORODlBENZOFURAN 1.6 PG/L
1,2,3, 7,8-PENT ACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.6 PG/L
1,2,3,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.1 PG/L
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 1.8 PG/L
2,3,4,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.2 PG/L
1,2,3,4,6,7 ,8-HEPT ACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.3 PG/L
1,2,3,4, 7 ,8-HEXACHLORODlBENZOFURAN 1.1 PG/L
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.2 PG/L
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-OIOXIN 1.6 PG/L
1,2,3,7 ,8,9-HEXACHLOROOIBENZ0-P-D10XIN 2 PG/L
TOTAL PENTACHLORODlBENZOFURANS 1.9 PG/L
OCTACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 360 PG/L
TOTAL HEXCHLOROOIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 2.2 PG/L
1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HEPT ACHLORODIBENZO-P-DJOXIN 20 PG/L
TOTAL PENTACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 3.4 PG/L
TOTAL HEPTACHLORODIBENZO-P-OIOXINS 29 PG/L
TOTAL HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 3.7 PG/L
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 7.9 PG/L
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD 2 PG/L
1,2,3, 7 ,8-PENT ACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN 3.4 PG/L
TOTAL TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXINS 1,6 PG/L
2,3. 7 ,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.2 PG/L
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HEPTACHLORODlBENZOFURAN 1.7 PG/L
TOTAL HEXACHLORODlBENZOFURANS 1.7 PG/L
TOTAL TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURANS 1.2 PG/L
2,3,4,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.8 PG/L
1,2,3, 7 ,8-PENT ACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1,8 PG/L
1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.6 PG/L
1,2,3,6, 7 .8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXlN 2.2 PG/L
2,3,4,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.7 PG/L
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.6 PG/L
1,2,3,4,7 ,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.6 PG/L
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1.7 PG/L
2,a,7,8 +E+R6GMbGRGQIBEt>IZG P QIGXlt-1 (!;/-l2Glb
~.Q ME:XAGMbGRGQIBE:MZG P QIGXlt>I 4,3 l2Glb
+G+o_l, P:Et>l'.f..AGMbGRGQIQ!;t,IZGl=I IR6t,IS = l2Glb
GG+6GMbGRGQIBEMii;G P QIGXIM 2W l2Glb
+G+o_l, i-.lEXGMbGROQIQE:MZO P QIOXIMS '4,e l2Glb
1,2,a,4,6,718 MEP+AGllbGRGQIBEM~O P QIOXlt,I 24 l2Glb
+G+'~ PEll+~GMbGR@IBl,MZG P QIGXIIIS 4,.7 l2Glb
+G+'b MEP+~GMbGR@IBHIZG P QIGXl>IS aa l2Glb
+G+6b MEP+AGMbGRGQIBEMZGl=I IRAMS 4;! l2Glb
GG+OGMbGRGQIBEIIZGeYRAII 2e l2Glb
1,2,J,4,7,8 MXGOQ 4,3 l2Glb
,.~.a.+,8 PEll+'GMbGRGQIBEMZG P QIGXl>I 4,.7 l2Glb
+G+6b +E+RAGMbGRGbllBEMZG P QIGXlt>JS (!;/-l2Glb
2,a1+18 +E+R6GMbGR0(;)186MZGl=YRAM 4,2 l2Glb
,.~.3,4,+,8,Q MEP+OGMbGR@IBEMZGeYROM 4.,.1. l2Glb
+G+ti.l: !IE:X6GMbGRGQIBEt,IZOl=YRAMS -1.<i l2Glb
+O+ti.l: +E+R/\GllbGROQIBBIZOl=I IR6t,IS 4,2 l2Glb
~.a,4,+,8 PEll+OGMbGRGQIBEMZGeYROOI (l,83 l2Glb
112,a1+18 P!;t>l+AGMbORObllBEt,IZOl=I IRAt,1 0,% l2Glb
Lab I Va11aat1on Detection
Qualifier Qualifier Limit
u 1.2
u 1
u 1.6
u 1.6
u 1.1
u 1.8
u 1.2
u 1.3
u 1, 1
u 1,2
u 1.6
u 2
u 1.9
u 2.2
u 20
u 3.4
u 3.7
u 7.9
u 2 u 3.4
u 1.6
u 1.2
u 1.7
u 1.7
u 1.2
u 1.8
u 1.8 u 1.6
u 2.2 u 1.7
u 1.6
u 1.6 u 1.7
ll (!;/-
ll 4,3
ll =
ll 4,e
ll 24
ll 4,.7
ll 4;!
ll 2e
ll 4,3
ll 4,.7
ll (!;/-
ll 4,2
ll 4.,.1.
ll -1.<i
ll 4,2
ll (l,83
ll 0,%
Dilution
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 ,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample
G(jffl
G(jffl
G(jffl
G(jffl
G(jffl
G(jffl
Qualifications Summary
Beazer, Raleigh
Q2-02
Analyte Result Units
, ,2,3,6,7,8 M.X, GMbGRGellBE>IZG~YR A fl -1,e PGlb
,,2,3,6,7,8 MEYOGMbGPGellBeMW P ellGXl>I -1,e PGlb
2,314,6,7.fl l..il;.YO:CMbORQDIBEMZOFIJRt.M -1,e PGlb
-6.7,8 MeP+OGMbGPGellBeflW,1 IRA>I ~ PGlb
~.2,3,417,8 1-lE:XACMbORODIBEMZQFI IR.:l~I -1--4 PGlb
1 ,2,3,7,8,Q Mg<PCMbORODIB!;MZOFI IPa'\M -1-,jj PGlb
Lab Validation Detecuon '
Qualifier Qualifier Limit Dilution
'
V -1,e -i
V -1,e -i
V -1,e -i
V ~ -i
V -1--4 -i I
V -1-,jj -i
ANAL ITICAL REPORT
PROJECT NO. BEAZER
Raleigh, ·Morrisville
Lot#, C2E290214
Gregory Malzone
The RETEC Group Inc
SEVERN TRENT LABORATORIES, INC.
Veronica Bertot
Project Manager
June 5, 2002
STL Pittsburgh is a part of Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.
SE:VERN
' SERVICES '
$TL Pittsburgh
450 William Pitt Way
Pittsburgh, PA 15238-1330
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.st!-inc.corn
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample Receiving:
CASE NARRATIVE
THE RETEC GROUP
Raleigh, Morrisville
STL Lot# C2E290214
STL Pittsburgh, PA received one sample on May 29, 2002 in good condition. The cooler
was within the proper temperature range.
GC/MS Semivolatiles SIM:
Due to the concentration ofpentachlorophenol detected, several samples were analyzed at
a dilution.
The reporting limits are adjusted for some samples to reflect the amount of sample used
in the extraction procedure.
The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate were outside control limits for
pentachlorophenol.
PARAMETER
8270C (SIM)
References:
MEIBODSSUMMARY
C2E290214
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
PREPARATION
METHOD
SW846 8270C SIM SW846 3520C
SW846 "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 and its updates.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SAMPLE SUMMARY
C2E2902l.4
WO# SAMPLE# CLIENT SAMPLE ID
El54D 001 PW0l
E154F 002 PW0l-DUP0l
E154G 003 C14B
E154H 004 C0lB
E154J 005 EB0l
E154K 006 C29B
NOTE(S)
-The analytical results of the samples listed above are presented on the following pages.
-All calculations arc performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
-Results noted as ·No" were not detected at or above lhe stated limit.
-This repon must not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory .
• Results for the following parameters arc never reported on a dry weight basis: color, corrosivi1y, density, flashpoint, ignitability, layers, odor,
paint filter test, pH, porosity pressure, reactivity, redox polential, specific gravity, spot tests, solids, solubility, temperature, viscosity, and weight,
SAMPLED SAMP
DATE TIME
05/28/02 14: 4 5
05/28/02 14: 4 5
05/28/02 13: 30
05/28/02 14: 30
05/28/02 15:15
05/28/02 14: 4 0
Chain of
Custody Record
STL-4124 (1200)
Client --n.. n -.--c / \v T" _A t,_, R
Address
--
n
'
l'c>7.--Z F' ~ IC .f1L.::N 54 c:::.k/&v
City ~/:~ I 'z'=~::;7 , ~ /),,,~-
P~ame and Location (State)
C7 0, / -(i7 r. 0 n; rA • A IC
C~chase Order/Quote No. \,) z.1 -,:::,3eo2 4 -o 9 (
Sample I. 0. No. and Description Date (Containers tor each sample may be combined on one line)
~Ol 5(72,
•' 'T') -,o " I ,,
~I"'-. c,1
' ,v..._S O~ I
C i 4v.:,..,
r n16
-C:bol
cz..c:i. 0
Possible Hazard Identification
D Non-Hazard 0 Flammable 0 Skin Irritant D Poison B
.
--- ---TRENT v,-ff ---SERVICES Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.
Projt Manager Date --&, ,0, s/-z.,-?> l=-z. Chain of CustodY. Number 108137
Telephone Number (Area Code)/Fax Number Lab Number I t "778 -.:J7 I -.q·z:z Page of
Site Contact l'vco~J-l.) Analysis (Attach list if
"S--\./:::,~ ~ more s ace is needed}
r-Carriertvvaybill Nu.,.., ,;,.3 -Z.. --Z.u<; ~ ~ Grl"Z.'"\ N 3-Z7 '.:)3,q----;-~::2,--z C, 0 tO Special Instructions/
Matrix Containers & Conditions of Receipt
PreseNatives .;
i ~ 0 "' < ~a '\ Time 1l ~ "' 0 u 0
~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ • ~~ -"' ~ < < < ~
1445 't 1)0 '{.
'
(2-)Z:,-;:,
J42>c
151~-L~ .£._L-o..,tt':-UI' ~ r I( ~-..,.l.
I L/ll{o ~
'
I Sample Disposal (A fee may be assessed if samples are retained
[iif\Jnknown D Return To Client ' :2f" _Disposal By Lab D Archive For Months longer than 3 months)
Turn Around Time Required
0 21 Days [ jig Olhe/--0.,.-,~ ,_f ·
QC Requirements (Specify)
D 24 Hours D 48 Hours D 70ays 0 14 Days
1 .. R~shed fY p .
1
06/ZJo/ Dd Tim{Jv-r> 1. Received By j Date
1
Time
I. I. /"A,_~ r-\' ~
2. Re/inquisheai,:Jy JU
1
Date
1
Time 2. Received By
1
Oare
1
Time
.
3. Relinquished By. I Date
1
Time 3.Receiv~ -l~/2,7/4, ITim/Ouu / ./ , _// ,/
Ccimments -' . .,,,, / T
DISTRIBUTION: WHITE -Stays with the Sample; CANARY -Returned to Client with Report: PINK -Field Copy
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lot-Sample# ... : C2E290214-001
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
Dilution Factor: 1
PARAMETER
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-d5
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
NOTE (S) :
THE RETEC GROUP INC
Client Sample ID: PW0l
GC/MS Semivolatiles
Work Order# ... : El54D1AA
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02
Matrix ......... : WATER
MS Run# ....... : 2151043
Method ......... : SW846 8270C SIM
REPORTING
RESULT LIMIT UNITS
ND 0.20 ug/L
45 E 1..0 ug/L
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
58 (32 112)
80 (10 -144)
75 (30 -110)
70 (13 -llO)
77 (10 -113)
87 (21 -122)
E Estimated result. Result concentration exceeds the calibration range.
Lot-Sample# ... : C2E290214-001
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
Dilution Factor: 4
PARAMETER
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-dS
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
THE RETEC GROUP me
Client Sample ID: PW0l
GC/MS Semivolatiles
Work Order# ... : El54D2AA
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02
Matrix ......... : WATER
MS Run# ....... : 2151043
Method ......... : SW846 8270C SIM
REPORTING
RESULT LIMIT UNITS
ND 0.80 ug/L
18 4.0 ug/L
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
56 (32 -112)
78 (10 -144)
70 ( 30 -110)
68 (13 -110)
67 (10 -113)
71 (21 -122)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE RETEC GROUP INC
Client Sample ID: PWOl-DUPOl
Lot-Sample# ... : C2E290214-002
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
GC/MS Semivolatiles
Work Order# ... : El54FlAA
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02
Matrix ......... : WATER
MS Run # ..••••• : 2151043
Dilution Factor: 1.08 Method ...... ; .. : SW846 8270C SIM
PARAMETER
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-d5
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
NOTE (S) :
RESULT
ND
35 E
PERCENT
RECOVERY
59
80
72
69
72
81
E Estimated result. Result concemration exceeds the calibration range.
REPORTING
LIMIT UNITS
0.22 ug/L
1.1 ug/L
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(32 -112)
(10 -144)
(30 -110)
(13 -110)
(10 -113)
(21 -122)
THE RBTEC GROUP me
Client Sample ID: PW0l-DUP0l
GC/MS Semivolatiles
Lot-Sample# ... : C2E290214-002 Work Order# ... : El54F2AA
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
Matrix ......... : WATER
I
I
I
MS Run # ....... : 2151043 I
Dilution Factor: 2.16 Method ......... : SW846 8270C SIM I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARAMETER
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-d5
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-dS
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
RESULT
ND
20
PERCENT
RECOVERY
55
75
69
64
65
74
REPORTING
LIMIT UNITS
0.43 ug/L
2.2 ug/L
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(32 -112)
(10 -144)
(30 -110)
(13 -110)
(10 -113)
(21 -122)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lot-Sample# ... : C2E290214-003
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
Dilution Factor: 1.09
PARAMETER
2,4°Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-d5
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
TIIB RETEC GROUP INC
Client Sample ID: Cl4B
GC/MS Semivolatiles
Work Order# ... : El54GlAA
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02
Matrix ......... : WATER
MS Run # ....... : 2151043
Method ......... : SW846 8270C SIM
REPORTING
RESULT LIMIT UNITS
ND 0.22 ug/L
ND 1.1 ug/L
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
46 (32 -112)
34 (10 -144)
59 (30 -110)
45 (13 -110)
54 (10 -113)
63 (21 -122)
Lot-Sample# ... : C2E290214-004
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
Dilution Factor: 1.1
PARAMETER
2,4-Dichlorophenol ·
Pentachlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-ds
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2,4,6-Tribromophenoi
THE RETEC GROUP INC
Client Sample ID: C0l.B
GC/MS Semivolatiles
Work Order# ... : El54HlAA
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02
Method ......... : SW846 8270C
REPORTING
RESULT LIMIT
ND 0.22
ND 1.1
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
54 (32 -112)
41 (10 -144)
66 (30 -110)
62 (13 -110)
66 (10 -113)
81 (21 -122)
Matrix ......... : WATER
MS Run # •.•...• : 2151043
SIM
UNITS
ug/L
ug/L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lot-Sample# ... : C2E290214-005
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
Dilution Factor: 1.19
PARAMETER
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-d5
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
THE RETEC GROUP INC
Client Sample ID: EBOl
GC/MS semivolatiles
work Order# ... : El54JlAA
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02
Matrix ......... : WATER
MS Run # .•.••.• : 2151043
Method ......... : SW846 8270C SIM
REPORTING
RESULT LIMIT UNITS
ND 0.24 ug/L
ND 1.2 ug/L
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
44 (32 112)
76 (10 -144)
54 (30 -110)
47 (13 -110)
54 (10 -113)
66 (21 -122)
Lot-Sample ff ••• : C2E290214-006
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Prep Batch ff ... : 2151155
Dilution Factor: 1.02
PARAMETER
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-d5
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
NOTE (S) :
THE RBTEC GROUP INC
Client Sample ID: C29B
GC/MS Sernivolatiles
Work Order ff ... : El54KlAA
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02
Matrix ......... : WATER
MS Run ff •.•..•• : 2151043
Method ......... : SW846 8270C SIM
REPORTING
RESULT LIMIT UNITS
ND 0.20 ug/L
1.10 E 1.0 ug/L
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
43 (32 -112)
62 (10 -144)
63 (30 -110)
47 (13 -110)
58 (10 -113)
74 (21 -122)
E Estimated result. Result concentration exceeds the calibration range.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lot-Sample# ... : C2E290214-006
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
Dilution Factor: 10.2
PARAMETER
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-ds
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
. THE RETEC GROUP INC
Client Sample ID: C29B
GC/MS semivolatiles
Work Order# ... : El54K2AA
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date ... : 06/05/02
Matrix ......... : WATER,
MS Run# ....... : 2151043
Method ......... : SW846 8270C SIM
REPORTING
RESULT LIMIT UNITS
ND 2.0 ug/L
41 10 ug/L
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
45 (32 -112)
70 (10 -144)
66 (30 -110)
52 (13 -110)
63 (10 -113)
. 92 (21 -122)
METHOD BLANK REPORT
GC/MS Semivolatiles
Client Lot# ... : C2E290214 Work Order# ... : El8XK1AA
MB Lot-Sample#: C2E310000-155
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02 Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
Dilution Factor: 1
PARAMETER
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-d5
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2,4,6-Tribrornophenol
NOTE (S) :
RESULT
ND
ND
PERCENT
RECOVERY
49
79
61
56
62
80
Calculations are perfonned before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
REPORTING
LIMIT
0.20
1.0
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(32 -112)
(10 -144)
(30 -110)
(13 -110)
(10 -113)
(21 -122)
Matrix ......... : WATER
UNITS METHOD
ug/L SW846 8270C SIM
ug/L SW846 8270C SIM
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT
GC/MS Semivolatiles
Client Lot# ... : C2E290214 Work Order# ... : ElBXKlAC Matrix ......... : WATER
LCS Lot-Sample#: C2E310000-155
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02 Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
Dilution Factor: 1
PERCENT RECOVERY
PARAMETER RECOVERY LIMITS METHOD
Pentachlorophenol 34 (10 -140) SW846 8270C SIM
2,4-Dichlorophenol 70 (42 -115) SW846 8270C SIM
PERCENT RECOVERY
SURROGATE RECOVERY LIMITS
Nitrobenzene-dS 52 (32 -112)
Terphenyl-d14 Bl (10 -144)
2-Fluorobiphenyl 69 (30 -110)
2-Fluorophenol 63 (13 -110)
Phenol-d5 65 (10 -113)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol 86 (21 -122)
NOTE(S):
Calrulations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT
GC/MS Sernivolatiles
Client Lot# ... : C2E290214 Work Order# ... : El54D1AC-MS
El54D1AD-MSD
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/04/02
Matrix ......... : WATER
MS Lot-Sample#: C2E290214-001
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/31/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2151155
Dilution Factor: 1.06
PARAMETER
Pentachlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
SURROGATE
Nitrobenzene-d5
Terphenyl-dl4
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol-d5
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
NOTE (S) :
PERCENT
RECOVERY
589 a
458 a
89
79
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(10 -140)
(10 -140)
(42 -115)
(42 -115)
PERCENT
RECOVERY
62
59
78
74
78
75
74
71
78
75
89
83
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calo.ilated results.
a Spiked analytc recovery is outside stated control limits.
MS Run # ••.•.•. : 2151043
RPD
RPD LIMITS METHOD
SW846 8270C SIM
11 (0-56) SW846 8270C SIM
SW846 8270C SIM
10 (0-44) SW846 8270C SIM
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(32 -112)
(32 -112)
(10 -144)
(10 -144)
(30 -110)
(30 -110)
(13 -110)
(13 -110)
(10 -113)
(10 -113)
(21 -122)
(21 -122)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
July 19, 2002
STL SACRAMENTO PROJECT NUMBER: G2E290199
PO/CONTRACT: 00524-04127
Greg Malzone
The RETEC Group Inc
3040 William Pitt Way
Pittsburgh, PA I 5238
Dear Mr. Malzone,
SEV.1;:RN
.TRENT
SERVICES
STL Sacramento
880 Riverside Parkway
West Sacramento, CA 95605-1500
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.stl-inc.com
This report contains the analytical results for the samples received under chain of custody by
STL Sacramento on May 29, 2002. These samples are associated with your Beazer -Raleigh
project.
The test results in this report meet all NELAC requirements for parameters for which
accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAC requirements are noted in
the case narrative. The case narrative is an integral part of this report.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
K----rh, ~
Karen M. Dahl
Project Manager
STL Sacramento is a part of Severn Trent laboratories, Inc.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STL SACRAMENTO PROJECT NUMJaER G2E290199
Case Narrative
STL Sacramento Quality Assurance Program
Sample Description Information
Chain of Custody Documentation
WATER, 8290, Dioxins/Furans, HRGC/HRMS
Samples: I, 2, 3, 4, 5
Sample Data Sheets
Method Blank Reports
Laboratory QC Reports
G2E290199
CASE NARRATIVE
STL SACRAMENTO PROJECT NUMBEIR G2E290199
General Comments
One of the bottles for EB0l was received broken. The bottles for sample C-29B were
labeled with a sampling time of 15:20. The sampling time listed on the COC was used in the
report.
Upon request by the client on 6/20/02, the positive results on sample EBO l were
double-checked, but no errors were detected. Since the backup bottle was broken in transit,
we were unable to re-extract and re-analyze this sample for confinnation. The results for
samples PW-01, PW-0l_DUP, & C-29B matched historical results. Since historical results
were not available for sample C-0lB, this sample was re-extracted and re-analyzed to rule out
a possible sample switch or a labeling error. The results for this re-extraction have been
reported under STL lot G2F240172. The re-extraction restLlts for C-0lB match very closely
with the results reported for sample EB0l, indicating a probable sample switch or a labeling
error. All of the original results have been reported in this re:port.
There were no other anomalies associated with this project.
STL. Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I G2E290199
STL Sacramento
Quality Control Definitions
~!~~~!(~;1irfj~'(§"!'lf""·'"'"''ll)'•~m·@!!".il1i:i!IT~•"m'1Wl!l:""l"''~Ef1i~~DJ~~·2•;tfu'!ll!''"~'""'"'~~lilli!'.i~":!'ii!illlimi'li'" ;1 .. 1l!'R~1~1Hlh! ·· ,. ".'J :ar@l.e .. r&J~1i'~!1~. .1 · _ ¥1=Hl.i:i!0~ '_,_ t;;U!'. ;~~J~g mfJl !~ : .( . _ . . &u~t ,..,_ ~--~~"' ii<! ~ ... 1 -: 1,.1 11 . ' '' ' .
A set of up to 20 field samples plus associated laboratory QC
QC Batch samples that are similar in composition (matrix) and that are
processed within the same time peri<XI with the same reagent and
standard lots.
Consist of a pair of LCSs analJe<ed within the same QC batch to
Duplicate Control Sample monitor precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix
(DCS) effects. This QC is performed c,nly if required by client or when
insufficient samnle is available to nerform MS/MSD.
A second aliquot of an environmental sample, taken from the same
sample container when possible, that is processed independently
with the first sample aliquot. The results are used to assess the
Duplicate Sample (DU) effect of the sample matrix on 1J1e precision _of the analytical
process. The precision estimated using this sample is not
necessarily representative of the precision for other samples in the
batch.
A volume of reagent water for aqueous samples or a contaminant-
free solid matrix (Ottawa sand; for soil and sediment samples
Laboratory Control Sample which is spiked w_ith known amounts of representative target
(LCS) analytes and required surrogatrn. An LCS is carried through the
entire analytical process and is used to monitor the accuracy of the
anal'"ical nrocess inde=ndent of notential matrix effects.
A field sample fortified with known quantities of target analytes
that are also added to the LCS. Matrix spike duplicate is a second
Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike matrix spike sample. MSs/MSl>s are carried througb the entire
Duplicate (MS/MSD) analytical process and are used to determine sample matrix effect
on accuracy of the measurerner.1 system. The accuracy and
precision estimated using MS/MSD is only representative of the
nrecision of the samnle that was sniked.
A sample composed of all the reagents (in the same quantities) in
reagent water carrie<l'through tbe entire analytical process. The
Method Blank (MB) method blank is used to monitc, the level of contamination
introduced durin~ samnle nr•naration ste.n.<.
Organic constituents not expec11:d to be detected in environmental
media and are added to every s:1mple and QC at a known
Surrogate Spike concentration. Surrogates are used to determine the efficiency of
the samnle oreoaration and the :1nalytical orocess.
Source: STI. Sacramento Laboratory Quality Manual
STL Sacramento Certifications:
Alaska (UST-055), Arizona (#AZ006 I 6), Arkansas, California (NELAP # 01 119CA) (ELAP #1-2439),
Connecticut (#PH-0691), Florida (E87570), Hawaii, Louisiana (Al# 30612), New Jersey (Lab ID 44005),
Nevada (#CA 044), New York (lAB ID 11666 serial# 107407), Oreg,::o (LAB ID CA 044), South Carolina
(LAB ID 87014, Cert.# 870140), Utah (E-168), Virginia (#00178), Washington(# C087), West Virginia(#
9930C), Wisconsin (Lab 998204680), USNAVY, USACE, USDA Fori!ign Plant (Permit # 37-82605), USDA
Foreign Soil (Pennit # S-46613) ..
STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600 '2 of 20
G2E290199
WO# Samule#
E150H 1
E1506 2
E1508 3
ElSlC 4
E151E 5
Notes(s):
Sample Summary
G2E290199
Client Sam11Ie ID Sarepling Date
PW-01 5/2 E/02 02:45 PM
PW-0l_DUP 5/2S/02 02:45 PM
C-29B 5/2:3/02 02:40 PM
C-0lB 5/28/02 02: 30 PM
EB0l 5/2:3/02 03: 15 PM
The analylical re.,;,.Jlcsofthesamples listed above are presented on the following pages.
All calculatio~ are performed before rounding 10 avoid round-off errors in calculated rcsul~:.
Results noted as .. ND" were not detected at or above the stated limit.
This report must not be .reproduce.d, exoept in full, without the written approval of the Jahoratory.
Received Date
5/29/02 09:10 AM
5/29/02 09:10 AM
5/29/02 09:10 AM
5/29/02 09:10 AM
5/29/02 09:10 AM
Results for the following parameters are neva reported on a dry weight basis: color, ccrro~vity, d1:miry, flashpoint, ignitability, layers,
odor, paint filter t~, pH, porosity, pressure, reactivity, red.ox potential, specific gravity, spot t{$(.S, solids, solubility, temperature, viscosity,
and weigh
STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--- ----- --- --~hain of
~ustody Record
"'
Sn-4112" (1200)
Client
·Jl..--._-z-~( f;,,~ fl
Address ' . 1 ... ,.
I&'?.. E. A IC... ,.,/, ~ l 54 &/u6 ~
Dvv1 .,.. lSte'" I Zip eooe J(.. -Z7,r~
f'!o/ed Nam<1 and Locatio,1 (State/
P.:, /'.?au .<;";? -• • 1,A. I.. IC..
CorrtractlPurchase Orden'Quote No. ~ • •
~'-0:,,,1.,-,,-4. oa 1
Sample I. D. No. and Description Date (Conlalner$ for NCh sample may be combined .on Me One)
::P<....?o/ i<hAlo7.
(f) .f)vpo/ ;:I t,
w fr6-.. I
iil rr<SO-o { ;!
(t' J C -z_ q ~
d"~olY'½
••~P">ot .... "' gi
(I) \•I-A.A • 1.-t\J' I.!,,..,__.,. 1 !';",Z., ,
.,-v;.!J t,.-r:tZ I. .. ,_·· . ' -~6'•1'1,,6 .....
Poulble Hazard Identification
Project Manager
4:.,,.. t&l~
Telephone Number (Area Code}IFsx Number
97t3-3'7l -l4Z:Z SI~:"",_ lab Contact
• llt'.~ ~
C.rrierNlayu,11 Num¥!,I e3z. ~ ~ Qo'TZ.L{ !!:3z. r,.,1z.4J 74 .d . it Cof'ltsiners & Matrix Preservatives 1----
I 1 0 p
~ a ~Ii ~ Time ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ t ' ' ' ~ ~i
144~ 1'1' y,
144-o
14bV
I ""i "''
- ---- --SEVERN.
TRENT
SERVICES·· ========== Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.
Dste Chain of Custocfy Number
4:; I zs 1 o-z. 108138
Lab Number
Page l of (
Analysis (Attach list if
more space is needed)
Special Instructions/
Conditions of Receipt
n= p y,."'-'15l--VI 7 I CO h r .1 ~ . · ... -.,;!_ ~ .....--,
I
I I I
I Semple Disposal
0 Non-Hazard □Flammable 0 Slcir, Irritant □-s DtJunknown O Retum To Client ~Disposal By Lab 0 Archive For
(A fee may be assessed ;r samples are retained
Months lor,ger than 3 months) n,m Around T,me Requlrtd .
0 UHoors D ••-rs □ ?Days
I. RtJlinquisherJ By
. bi A •. 6-,
2 Re/mquished S,
3. R~uished By
Comment. ...
l L. ....
("-.....,) 0
.
0 21 Da~ '\F"J Qthe,,x'.;)4 □ 1<Days .J • "
~1~ (j 7,,.,
1
oate
1
Time
,Date I Tirm,
'/ifSTRIBUnON:. WHITE· Slays wfth me $ample: CANARY. Retvmed to Cf/ent wfth Report: PINK -Field Copy
QC Requirements (Specify)
1. ReceNed By 11LI ..Li-.s l~e Time -Vi ~c>"L-/ II ) 0
2. Received By I'' . V . . I Dare
1
Time
3. Received By . I Date
1
nme
LOT RECEIPT CHECKLIST
STL Sacramento
cLIENT . . . Rrlrc... .
• LOT/ (QUANTiMs•1DJ . $.G::z._.1$ {q 1
DATE RECEIVED . G° _,.;2.'1--0"1---TIME RECEIVED ----i1..1_f,.:,'D,,_. --'----
. DELIVERED BY f:j1=EDEX
□AIRBORNE
□UPS
0 STL COURIER
, 0 CA OVERNIGHT \\.□ CLIENT
0 GOLDENSTATE . 0 DHL
0 BAX GLOBAL O GO-GETTERS
0 B & B O OTHER .. ---
CUSTODY SEAL STATUS B1NTACT O BROKEN ON/A
CUSTODY SEAL i<Sl · 'J !'.;,:, .:,:1 'J ~
SHIPPPING CONTAINERCSl O STL Z(CLJENT ON/A
TEMPERTURE RECORD CIN °Cl · JR . 10 2 (a-" □·OTHER ___ _
coc UCS) t O ftl ) '.l 174 ?:,45:--r
. TEMPERATURE BLANK
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE· _ __.2,.._}_'-'---..-, ~'J-• _____ _
COLLECTOR'S NAME:
pH MEASURED
D verified from coc
0 YES O ANOMALY
D Not on coc
ON/A
LABELED BY ......................................................................................... .
LABELS CHECKED BY .................................. , ......................................... .
SHORT HOLD.TEST NOTIFICATION SAMPLE RECEIVING
WETCHEM O NIA
Initials
;_
-
.,
Date
5-'2f(-0'2-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. . .
D METALS NOTIFIED OF FILTER/PRESERVE VIA VERBAL & EMAIL □ N/A I
0 COMPLETE SHIPMENT RECEIVED IN GOOD CONDITION WITH O N/A ·
APPROPRIATE TEMPERATURES, CONTAINERS, PRESERVATIVES . I
0 Clouseau . 0 TEMPERATURE EXCEEDED <2 ··6 •CJ ON/A
,lf n/
□ WET. {CE. □ BLUE ICE D GEL.PACK I
. 0 PM NOTIFIED · 0 NO COOLING ~GENTS USED .
Notes: · . ,.
. . &f 5 ,rte..] . ~ eo ( ~ pr-0 ~ ; I "6 ·z. A::Gi e; I
. . . :¢."3: -[IC 'ft/ £.-,,c-n '-"::42 '2-b5"'l O J Ci?..f._/...._,, ;J;s..._._(#14'(~0-------.
LEAVE NO SPACES BLANK. USE "NIA" IF NOT APPLICABLE. INITIAL AND DATE ALL "NIA" ENTRIES. · QA185 8/00 NEK
G2E290199 STL -Sacramento (916) 373 -5600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. , .
VOA
VOAh .
. •
. O.GB
AGBS
250AGB ..
I
: '250AGBS .
2SOAGBn
250AGBna
__ AGJ
SOOAGJ
250AGJ
125AGJ
CGJ --
SOOCGJ
2SOCGJ
125CGJ
PB/PJ --
PBn/PJn
SOOPS/PJ
SOOPBn/PJn
SOOPBna
SOOPBzn/na
250PB
...,.. 250P3n
i I 2 3 . 4 5 I 6 I 7 .8 9 10 l 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 111 20
'//////////1//////1////
"////.//V///V/// /1////
//J '2 2 "l . .' J .
I I
I
I
I
I
I
2s0Psna ·
< I . I I
----+--l---!--lf-,--f---!--+----l'----1--+--+--'-'-_!..--i--+-+--+-l,---t--+--I I
2s□PB2n/na ,.
_·cr ::':-·--f .,. . . -· ,.
Encore I
i'OlderlFilter i i ' ' ' I I
i>UF
·· PetrVFflter . • . ·
! I • I I I
I ' ' ' I I 4--... _ ~ .... 7"
.. -
XADTrap . --
. Zlploc
1 -2 3. 4 s I s 7 a s 10 -11 12 13 14 1s 1s 17 1s 1s 20
h • hydrochloric acid s • sulturlc acid na -sodium hydroxide· n • nitric acid zn -zinc acetate,·
· .,. Number of VOA's with air bubbles present l to-21 number Of VOA'S ... -
G2E290199 STL -Sacramento (916) 373 -5600 6 i>f 20
I .
I
I
I
I
I
WATER, 8~;~90, I
I Dioxins/Furans, I HRGC/HRIMS I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
G2E290199 STL -Sacramento (916) 373 -5600 · 7of21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE RETEC GROUP INC
Client Sample ID: PW·•Ol
Trace Leve1 Organic C~pounds
Lot-Sample# •.. : G2E290199·001
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date •..... : 05/30/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2150100
Dilution Factor: l
PARl>.METER
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Total TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-IDtCDD
Total HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Total TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PecpF
Total PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-IDcCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hx:CDF
Total HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
OCDF
INTERNAL STANDARDS
lJC-2,3,7,8-TCDD
13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
lJC-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
l3C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
G2E290199
Work Order # ... : ElS C•HlAA
Date Received .. : 05/:29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/~8/02
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT
ND 5.2
ND 5.2
ND 7.2
ND 7.2
ND 3.4
ND 3.7
ND 3.3
ND 3.7
ND 3.3
ND 3.3
ND 14
ND 2.9
ND 2.9
ND 4.3
ND 4.4
ND 5.0
ND 2.5
ND 2.5
ND 2.7
ND 2.7
ND 2.7
ND 2.8
ND 3.2
ND 3.2
ND 4.4
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMI'rs
60 (40 .. 135)
83 (40 -135)
84 (40 .. 135)
94 (40 .. 135)
98 (40 •. 135)
79 (40 .. 135)
79 (40 135)
75 (40 135)
96 (40 135)
STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
Matrix ......... : WATER
UNITS METHOD
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L. SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
a Ot 20
I
THE RETEC GROUP INC:
Client Sample ID: PW-01._DUP
Trace Level Organic Com;pounds
Lot-Sample# ... : G2E290199-002
Date Sampled ..• : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/30/02
Prep Batch# .•. , 2150100
Dilution Factor: l
PARAMETER
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Total TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD.
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Total TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HlcCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
OCDF
INTERNAL STANDARDS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
l3C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
G2E290199
Work Order # ... : El5'l61AA
Date Received .• : 05/:29/02
Analysis Date •. : 06/,)8/02
DETllCTION
RESULT LIMIT
ND 3.0
ND 3.0
ND 4.6
ND 6.4
ND 2.8
ND 3.1
ND 2.7
ND 3.l
ND 3.2
ND 3.2
ND 21
ND l. 7
ND 1,7
ND 2.8
ND 2.8
ND 2.8
ND 2.0
ND 2.0
ND 2.2
ND 2.2
ND 2.2
ND 2.0
ND 2.4
ND 2.4
ND 3.5
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMI'.rs
61 (40 .. 135)
85 (40 .. 135)
87 (40 -135)
94 (40 .. 135)
90 (40 .. 135)
80 (40 .. 135)
80 (40 135)
82 (40 135)
97 (40 .. 135)
STL -Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
Matrix ......••. : WATER
UNITS METHOD
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846' 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THR RETBC GROUP INC
Client sample ID: c-:l9B
Trace Level Organic C0111j)OWlds
Lot-Sample# ... : G2E290199-003 work Order # ••• : El 5 o B lJ\A
Date Received •• : 05/:?9/02
Analysis Date •. : 06/08/02
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/30/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2150100
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIM:-:T
2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 1.4
Total TCDD ND 1.4
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 2.7
Total PeCDD ND 2.7
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ·ND 1.8
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 1.9
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND 1. 7
Total HxCDD ND 2.2
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND l.2
Total HpCDD ND 12
OCDD 99 J
2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 1.1
Total TCDF ND 1.1
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.6
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.6
Total PeCDF ND 1.8
l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 1.1
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 1.1
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 1.2
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 1.2
Total HxCDF ND 1.2
1,2,3,4,6,7~8-HpCDF ND 2.7
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND l..5
Total HpCDF ND 3.7
OCDF ND 6.1
PERCENT RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY LIMI'.:S
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 79 (40 .. 135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 86 (40 .. 135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 84 (40 .. 135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,B-HpCDD 92 (40 .. 135)
l3C-OCDD 94 (40 .. 135)
l3C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 86 (40 .. 135)
13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 82 (40 •. 135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF Bl. (40 135)
13C-l, 2, 3, 4, .6, 7, 8-HpCDF 93 (40 135_)
NOTR(S):
J Estimated result. Resuk k less lhrm the reporting limit.
G2E290199 STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
Matrix ....••••• : WATER
UNITS METHOD
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SWB46 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L. ·sW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SWB46 8290
10 of 20
THE RBTBC GROUP Dill~
Client Sample ID: C-OIB
Trace Level Organic , Conpoundi;
Lot-Sample# ..• : G2E290199-004
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ..•... : 05/30/02
Prep Batch# ••. : 2150100
Dilution Factor: 1
PARAMETER
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Total TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Total TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1, 2, 3-,6, 7, 8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCOF
Total HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,~,9-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
OCDF
INTERNAL STANDARDS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
lJC-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
lJC-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
NOTES :
J Es:dmaied rauh. Result It IC# lhan dte reporting limit.
G2E290199
Work Order # ••• : E151C1AA
Date Received .• : 05/:19/02
Analysis Date .• : 06/08/02
DETECTION
RESULT LIMIT
ND 1.9
ND 1.9
ND 2.6
ND 2.6
ND 1. 7
ND 1.8
ND 1. 6
. ND 1.8
ND 5.6
ND 6.4
54 J
ND 1.0
ND 1.0
ND 1.6
ND 1.6
ND 1.9
ND 1.1
ND 1.1
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 1.3
ND 1.5
ND 2.7
ND 3.8
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
64 (40 -DS)
86 (40 .. 1.3 5)
81 (40 -135)
96 (40 -135)
98 (40 -135)
84 (40 .. l.35)
80 (40 -135)
73 (40 -l.35)
90 (40 -l.35)
STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
Matrix ...•..... : WATER
UNITS METHOD
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290'
pg/L SW846 8290
[ig/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
r,g/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE RETBC GROUP INC
Client Sample ID: EBOJ.
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Lot-Sample# ••• : G2E290199-005
Date Sampled ... : 05/28/02
Prep Date ...... : 05/30/02
Prep Batch# •.. : 2150100
Di1ution Factor: 1
PARAMETER
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Total TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Total TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-:PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Total PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
Total HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,B-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
OCDF
INTERNAL STANDARDS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8•HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
G2E290199 '
Work Order# ... : El51ElAA
Date Received •• : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 06/08/02
DETBCTION
RESULT LIMIT
ND 1.6
ND 1.6
ND 3.4
ND 3.4
ND 2.0
ND 2.2
ND 2.0
ND 2.2
ND 20
29
360
ND 1.1
ND 1.~
ND 1. E,
ND 1.E,
ND 1. 51
ND 1.E:
ND l.E:
ND 1 ., . '
ND 1 ., . '
ND 1 ., . '
ND 1. e,
ND 1.7
ND 3 ., . '
ND 7 .. 9
PERCENT REC::>VERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
80 (40 -135)
86 (40 -13 5)
83 (4() -'135)
98 (4() -135)
100 (40 -135)
85 (4() .. 135)
81 (4() -135)
76 (40 -135)
93 (41) -135)
STL • Sacramento (916) 373 -5600
Matrix ..•.••... : WATER'
UNITS METHOD
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290,
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
-pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 82.90
pg/L SW846 8290
SAMPLE#
001
002
003
004
005
G2E290199
QC DATA ASSOCIATION SUl\ifMARY
G2E290199
Sample Preparation and Analysis Control Numbers
ANALYTICAL LEACH PREP
MATRIX METHOD BATCH # BATCH #
WATER SW846 8290 2150100
WATER SW846 8290 2150100
WATER SW846 8290 2150100
WATER SW846 8290 2150100
WATER SW846 8290 2150100
STL -Sacramento (916) 373 -5600
MS RUN/I
2150010
2150010
2150010
2150010
2150010
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
METHOD BLANK REPORl'.
Trace Level Organic Compounds:
Client Lot# ... : G2E290l.99 Work Order# ... : El.6N9l.AA
MB Lot-Sample#: G2E300000-l.OO
Prep Date •.•... : 05/30/02
Analysis Date .• : 06/04/02 Prep Batch# ..• : 21.50100
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT UNITS
2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 4. l. pg/L
Total TCDD ND 4.1 pg/L
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND l.O pg/L
Total PeCDD ND l.O pg/L
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 5.2 pg/L
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 5.6 pg/L
1,2,3,7,8,9-IDcCDD ND 4.9 pg/L
Total HxCDD ND 5.6 pg/L
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 7.2 pg/L
Total HpCDD ND 7.2 pg/L
OCDD ND 17 pg/L
2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 3.0 pg/L
Total TCDF ND 3.0 pg/L
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 5.6 pg/L
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 5.5 pg/L
Total PeCDF ND 6.2 pg/L
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 4.5 pg/L
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 4.2 pg/L
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hx.CDF ND 4.6 pg/L
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 4.9 pg/L
Total HxCDF ND 4.9 pg/L
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND 6.0 pg/L
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 7.1 pg/L
Total RpCDF ND 7. J. pg/L
OCDF ND 7.6 pg/L
PERCENT RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY LIMITS
l.3C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 75 (40 -135)
l.3C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 76 (40 -135)
l.3C-l.,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 76 (40 -J.35)
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 78 (40 -135)
l.3C-OCDD 70 (40 -135)
l3C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 69 (40 -:t35)
l3C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 61 (40 -:t35)
13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 65 (40 -135)
l.3C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 76 (40 -135)
NOTE (S) :
Cakub.1lons arc performed bcfon: roundina t0 avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
G2E290199 STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
Matrix •........ : WATER
METHOD
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
14~ 20
I
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE Dl,TA. REPORT
Trace Level Organic Compounfui
Client Lot# ••. : G2E290199 Work Order# ... : El6N'llAC Matrix ..••••••• : WATER
I
I
I
I
I
LCS Lot-Sample#: G2E300000-100
Prep Date •.••.• : 05/30/02 Analysis Date .. : 06/0<1/02
Prep Batch# .•• : 2150100
Dilution Factor: i
PARAMETER
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2.,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2.,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-BpCDD
OCDD
2,3.,7,8-TCDF
1,2.,3,7,8-PecDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7!8-IDcCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-RxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
OCDF
INTERNAL STANDARD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
l3C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C·l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C·OCDD
13C-2,"3,7,8-TCDF
13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
NOT.B (S) :
SPIKE
AMOUNT
200
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
2000
200
1000
l.000
1000
1000
l.000
1000
1000
1000
2000
MEASURED
AMOUNT
182
893
952
975
979
l.040
2070
201.
l.l.20
l.l.l.O
1130
1070
l.220
l.180
1090
l.090
2040
PERCENT
RECOVERY
69
87
83
84
75
68
66
70
79
Calculations arc: pcrlormed before rou:ndins: 10 avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
Bold print denotes control paramclmi
G2E290199 STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
PERCENT I llNITS RECOVERY METHOD
pg/L 9l. SW846 8290
pg/L 89 SW846 8290
pg/L 95 Sii846 8290 I pg/L 97 S11846 8290
pg/L 98 SW846 8290
pg/L l.04 SW846 8290 I pg/L l.03 SW846 8290
pg/L l.00 S11846 8290
pg/L l.12 S11846 8290
pg/L ].].]. SWB46 8290 I pg/L l.l.3 SW846 8290
pg/L l.07 Sif846 8290
pg/L l.22 SW846 8290 I pg/L 118 Sif846 8290
pg/L l.09 SW846 8290
pg/L 109 SW846 8290
pg/L 102 SW846 8290 I
RECOVERY I LIMITS
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135) I (40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135) I (40 -l.35)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
I
I
I
I
150121
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT
Trace Level Organic Compound.$
Client Lot# ... : G2E290199 Work Order# ... : El6N91AC
LCS Lot-Sample#: G2E300000-100
Prep Date •••..• : 05/30/02 Analysis Date •. : 06/04,/02
Prep Batch# ••• : 2150100
Dilution Factor: 1
PERCENT RECOVERY
PARAMETER RECOVERY LIMITS
2,3,7,8-TCDD 91 (75 -126)
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 89 (82 -124)
1,2,3,4,7,8-BxCDD 95 (70 -135)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 97 (76 -l.27)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 98 (66 -J.42)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-BpCDD l.04 (82 -1241
OCDD l.03 (82 -128)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 100 (70 -1321
1.,2,3,7,8-PecDF 112 (74 -131.I
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF l.11 (62 -137)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF l.l.3 (84 -l.24)
1,2,3,6,7,8-B.xCDF 107 (75 -l.28)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 122 (71 -l.46)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF l.l.8 (73 -l.44)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF l.09 (74 -l.31)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF l.09 (73 -l.35)
OCDF l.02 (70 -l.42)
PERCENT
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 69
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 87
13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 83
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 84
13C-OCDD 75
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 68
13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 66
13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 70
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 79
NOTE (SI:
Calculations arc performed before rounding 1o avoid round~ff mors in calculated results.
Bold print denotes COntttll paramcccrs
G2E290199 STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
Matrix .•..•.... : WATER
METHOD
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(40 135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
('iO -135)
(40 -135)
I
16 of.20
I
I
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE DATA REPORT I
Trace Level Organic Com1>0unds
Client Lot # ..• : G2E290199 Work Order # .•• : E150:,:1AC-MS Matrix ..... _ .. _ : WATER I MS Lot--Sample 1/: G2E290199-001 El50HlAD-MSD
Date Sampled ..• : 05/28/02 Date Received .. : 05/23/02
I Prep Date .•.•.• : 05/30/02 Analysis Date •• : 06/0,3/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2150100
Dilution Factor: l
SAMPLE SPIKE MEASRD PERCNT I PARAMETER AMOUNT AMT AMOUNT UNITS RECVRY RPD METHOD
2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 209 205 pg/X., 98 SW846 8290 I ND 211 214 pg/l~ 101 4.4 SW846 8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 1040 1040 pg/L 100 SW846 8290,
ND 1060 1060 pg/L 100 1.8 SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCl)D ND 1040 1070 pg/L 102 SW846 8290 I ND 1060 1000 pg/L 95 6.1 SW846 8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 1040 1040 pg/L 100 SW846 8290
ND 1060 1050 pg/L 100 1.2 SW846 8290 I 1,2,3,7,8,9-II?CCDD ND 1040 1080 pg-/L 103 SW846 8290
ND 1060 1000 pg/1; 95 7.2 SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 1040 1030 pg/J. 99 SW846 8290
ND 1060 1130 pg/J; 107 9.0 SW846 8290 I OCDD ND 2090 2040 pg/1, 97 SW846 8290
ND 2110 2190 pg/1. 104 7.5 SW846 8290
2,3,"J,8-TCDF ND 209 209 pg/]. 100 SW846 8290 I ND 211 212 pg/L 100 1.5 SW846 8290
l.,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 1040 1040 pg/L 99 SW846 8290
HD 1060 1070 pg/L 101 3.3 SW846 8290
2,3,,4., 7, 8-PeCDF ND 1040 l.l.00 pg/L 105 SWB46 8290 I ND l.060 ll.60 pg/L l.l.O 5.4 SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 1040 1010 pg/L 97 SW846 8290
ND 1060 1080 pg/I. l.02 6.2 SWB46 8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-llxCDF ND 1040 1020 pg/L 97 SW846 8290 I HD 1060 1080 pg/L 102 5.7 SW846 8290
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF HD 1040 1030 pg/L 99 SW846 8290
ND 1060 1130 pg/L 107 9.5 SW846 8290 I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 1040 960 pg/L 92 SW846 8290
HD 1060 909 pg/L 86 5.4 SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF ND 1040 1050 pg/L 100 SW846 8290
ND 1060 1090 pg/L 103 4.1 SW846 8290 I 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF ND 1040 1040 pg/L 99 SW846 8290
ND l.060 1000 pg/I, 95 3_9 SW846 8290
OCDF ND 2090 1960 pg/L 94 SW846 8290 I HD 2110 2140 pg/L 101 8.5 SW846 8290
(Continued on next page)
I
I
G2E290199 STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600 Ho12I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MATRIX SPIICE SAMPLE DATA REPOR.T
Trace Level Organic C~pounds
Cl.ient Lot II .•• : G2E290199 Work Order I/ ••• : E150:,:1AC-MS Matrix: ...•..•.. : WATER MS Lot-Sample 1/: G2E290199-001 El50.fl1AD··MSD
PERCENT
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 54
48
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 69
77
l3C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 72
87
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 86
87
13C-OCDD 93
82
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF ·54
71
l3C·l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 65
72
13C-J.,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 70
79
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 83
89
NOTES),
Calcul2tions are performed before rounding to avoid l'OUOO-<iff cno,s in calc.ubted results.
Bold print dci:IO(CS control parameters
G2E290199 STL. Sacramento {916) 373 • 5600
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(40 -135)
{40 -135)
(40 -135)
( 40 -135)
{40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
{40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(~0 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
I
18 01,20
I
I
I
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE EVALUATJ:ON RE:PORT I
Trace Level Organic Co~pouuds
Client Lot 11 ... : G2E290199 Work Order ff •.• : ElSOHlAC-MS Matrix ......... : WATER I MS Lot-Sample ff: G2E290199-001 ElSOHlAD-MSD
Date Sampled •.. : 05/28/02 Date Received .• : 05/2;/02
I Prep Date ...... : 05/30/02 Analysis Date .• : 06/0,3/02
Prep Batch ff ••. : 2150100
Dilution Factor: l
PERCENT RECOVERY RPD I PARAMETER RECOVERY LIMITS g]/!2_ LIMITS METHOD 2,3,7,8-TCDD 98 (75 -126) SW846 8290
101 (75 -126) 4 .4 (0-20) SW846 8290 I 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 100 (82 -124) SW846 8290
·100 (82 -124) 1.8 (0-20) SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hx:CDD 102 (70 -135) SW846 8290 I 95 (70 -135) 6.1 (0-20) SW846 8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 100 (76 -127) SW846 8290
100 (76 -127) 1.2 (0-20) SW846 8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 103 (66 -142) SW846 8290 I 95 (66 -142) 7 .. 2 (0-20) SW846 8290
1;2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 99 (82 -124) SW846 8290
107 (82 -124) 9. 0 (0-20) SW846 8290 I OCDD 97 (82 -128) SW846 8290
104 (82 -128) 7 . .5 (ll-20) SW846 8290
2,3, "/, 8-TCDF 100 (70 -132) SW846 8290
100 (70 -132) 1.5 (0-20) SW846 8290 I 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 99 (74 -131) SW846 8290
101 (74 -131) 3.3 (ll-20) SW846 8290
2,3,4,7,8-PeCOF 105 (62 -137) SW846 8290 I 110 (62 -137) 5 .•l. (0-20) SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 97 (84 -124) SW846 8290
102 (84 -124) 6.2 (11-20) SW846 8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 97 (75 -128) SW846 8290 I 102 (75 -128) 5 .. , ((1-20) SW846 8290
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 99 (71 -146) SW846 8290
107 (71 -146) 9. !i ((1-20) SW846 8290 I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 92 (73 -144) SW846 8290
86 (73 -144) 5 .il ((1-20) SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 100 (74 -131) Sli846 8290
103 (74 -131) 4. :, ((1-20) SW846 8290 I 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 99 (73 -135) SW846 8290
95 (73 -135) 3.11 (0-20) SW846 8290
OCDF 94 {70 142) SW846.8290 I 101 (70 -142) 8.5 (0-20) SW846 8290
(Continued on next page,)
I
I
G2E290199 STL -Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600 19of21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MATRIX SPIRE SAMPLE EVALOA1':CON ImPORT
Trace Level Organic Corrpoundu
C1ient Lot # ••• : G2E290199 Work Order ff ••• : El501!1AC-MS Matrix ......... : WATER 1 MS Lot-Sample#: G2E290199-001 El50HlAD-MSD
PERCENT
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 54
48
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 69
77
13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 72
87
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 86
87
13C-OCDD 93
82
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 64
71
l3C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 65
72
13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 70
79
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 83
89
NOTB(S):
Calculalioos are performed before rounding lO •vokl: round-off errors in calcuwed results.
Bold prinl deootcs cootrol panmeten.
G2E290199 STL -Sacramento (916) 373 -5600
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
( •10 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
20 of 20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
July 19, 2002
STL SACRAMENTO PROJECT NUMBER: G2F240172
PO/CONTRACT: 00524-04127
Gregory A. Malzone
The RETEC Group Inc
3040 William Pitt Way
Pittsburgh, PA 15238
Dear Mr. Malzone,
SEV¥RN
:TRENT··
SERVICES
STL Sacramento
880 Riverside Parkway
West Sacramento, CA 95605.1500
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
www.stl-inc.com
This report contains the analytical re-extraction results for sample C-0IB, received under
chain of custody by STL Sacramento on May 29, 2002. This sample is associated with your
Beazer -Raleigh project.
The test results in this report meet all NELAC requirements for parameters for which
accreditation is required or available. Any exceptions to NELAC requirements are noted in
the case narrative. The case narrative is an integral part of this report.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
IC...__ /1-1. <J-4
Karen M. Dahl
Project Manager
STL Sacramento is a part of Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STL SACRAMENTO PROJECT NUMJEIER G2F240172
Case Narrative
STL Sacramento Quality Assurance Program
Sample Description Information
Chain of Custody Documentation
WATER, 8290, Dioxins/Furans, HRGC/HRMS
Samples: 1
Sample Data Sheets
Method Blank Reports
Laboratory QC Reports
G2F240172
CASE NARRATIVE
STL SACRAMENTO PROJECT NUMJEIER G2F240172
WATER, 8290, Dioxins/Furans, HRGC/HRMS
The LCS shows high recoveries for 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF & J,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF. Since
the associated sample results were 'ND' for these analytes and the matrix spikes showed
acceptable recoveries, no further correction action was performed. There should be no impact
on the data.
This sample was re-extracted and re-analyzed for confirmation. Please note that the
sample was re-extracted 3 days past the recommended holding time for this analysis.
The original results for this sample have been reported under STL lot G2E290199. Please
refer to the case narrative for G2E290199 for additional information.
There were no other anomalies associated with this project.
STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I G2F240172
STL Sacramento
Quality Control Defmitions
1~*-"(,;'.l°i'.,!i.'"<i'~~~·•"\ffil'''Sfu'l'l\li!~ill/jt'~ •~11!~f.lr!''fi!/.t~~-nttit/ilril.'"it~11~•t~mi,,u,"''!il~•if •11i""il' • i .. ,;f~if._m'f!'.F~.l~ · .. : -•~ __ e ... !' ~!Iii !Ii! . U, ~lrj:!'!L,i;!:'.. ~;;,!;lli'ii~ :: .. ,, ·:,;,1.,;;.:p,1\,,1;;;,,f. •• ~:, ~J H ~. .r.Ciff.~'ftl. 1 ,~~~:ioill~~t
A set of up to 20 field samples plus associated laboratory QC
QC Batch samples that are similar in composition (matrix) and that are
processed within the same time period with the same reagent and
standard lots.
Consist of a pair of LCSs analyzed within the same QC batch to
Duplicate Control Sample monitor precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix
(DCS) effects. This QC is performed only if required by client or when
insufficient samnle is available to nerform MS/MSD.
A second aliquot of an environmental sample, taken from the same
sample container when possibk, that-is processed independently
with the first sample aliquot. The results are used to assess the
Duplicate Sample (DU) effect of the sample matrix on L1e precision of the analytical
process. The precision estimattd using this sample is not
necessarily representative oft]ui precision for other samples in the
batch.
A volume of reagent water for i.queous samples or a contaminant-
free solid matrix (Ottawa sand) for soil and sediment samples
Laboratory Control Sample which is spiked with known amounts of representative target
(LCS) analytes and required surrogates. An LCS is carried through the
entire analytical process and is used to monitor the accuracy of the
anal••'cal nrocess indenendent ,Jf oolential matrix effects.
A field sample fortified with known quantities of target analytes
that are also added to the LCS. Matrix spike duplicate is a second
Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike matrix spike sample. MSs/MSDs are carried through the entire
Duplicate (MS/MSD) analytical process and are used to determine sample matrix effect
on accuracy of the measurement system. The accuracy and
precision estimated using MS/MSD is only representative of the
orecision of the samole that wa,; soiked.
A sample composed of all the r<>lgents (in the same quantities) in
reagent water carried through die entire analytical process. The
Method Blank (MB) method blank is used to monitor the level of contamination
introduced durin~ sarnnle nr•naration stens.
Organic constituents not expected to be detected in environmental
media and are added to every sumple nnd QC at a known
Surrogate Spike concentration. Surrogates are u,:ed to d~.termine the efficiency of
the samnle nr.-naration and the nnalvtical orocess.
Source: STI. Sacramento Laboratory Quality Manual
STL Sacramento Certifications:
Alaska (UST-055), Arizona (#AZll0616), Arkansas, California (NELAP # 01 I 19CA) (El.AP #I-2439),
Connecticut (#PH-0691), Florida (E87570), Hawaii, Louisiana (AI# 30612), New Jersey (Lab ID 44005),
Nevada (#CA 044), New York (LAB ID 11666 serial# 107407), Oregon (I.AB ID CA 044), South Carolina
(LAB ID 87014, Cert.# 870140), Utah (E-168), Virginia (/#00178), Washington(# Ol87), West Virginia(#
9930C), Wisconsin (Lab 998204680), USNA VY, USACE, USDA Fomign Plant (Permit# 37-82605), USDA
Foreign Soil (Permit# S-46613) ..
STL -Sacramento (916) 373 -5600 2 of 9
G2F240172
WO#
E3K5M
Notes(s):
Sample#
I
Sample Summary
G2F240172
Client Sample ID
corn
Sampling Date
5/28102 02:30 PM
The analytical results of the samples listed above are presented on the following pages.
All calculations asc perfonned before rounding to avoid round-off errors in c.alculated n~lts.
Results noted as "ND" were not detected at or above the stated limit.
This report must not be reproduced. except in full, without the written approval of the labwatory.
Received Date
5/29/02 09:10 AM
Results for the following parameters are never reported on a dry weight basis: color. oorrosivity, density, flashpoint, ignitability, layers,
odor, paint filter test. pH, porosity, pressure, reactivity, redox potential, specific gravit)·, spot tests, solids, solubility, temperature, viscosity,
and weigh
STL -Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I WATER, 8~:~f~0,
I Dioxins/Fur,,:¼11s,
I HRGC/HR~\/1S
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I · I G2F240172 STL -Sacramento (916) 373 -5600 4 of 9
I I I I I
THE RBTEC GROUP INC
Client Sample ID, C0lB
Trace Level organic Compounds
Lot-Sample# ••. , G2F240172-001
Date Sampled •.. , 05/28/02
Prep Date .....• , 06/30/02
Prep Batch# ... , 2182351
Dilution Factor: l
PARAMETER
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Total TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Total PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Total TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Total.PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hx:CDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
l, 2, 3, ·7, 8, 9-Hx.CDF.
Total HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Total HpCDF
OCDF
INTERNAL STANDARDS
13C-2, 3 ,.7, 8-TCDD
13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
l3C·l,2,3,4,6,7,8·HpCDD
13C·OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
l3C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
G2F240172
Work Order fl ... , E3K5MlAA
Date Received .. : 05/29/02
Analysis Date .. : 07/04/02
DETllCTION
RESULT LIM:['.£__
ND 0.70
ND 0.70
ND 1. 7
ND 1. 7
ND 1.3
ND 1.5
ND 1. 3
ND 1.5
ND 24
33
250
ND 1.2
ND 1.2
ND 0. 9!)
ND 0.93
ND 0.9S
ND 1.4
ND 1.5
ND 1.5
ND 1. 6
ND 1.6
ND 4.2
ND 1.1
ND 13
ND 26
PERCENT RECCVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
88 (40 · 135)
81 (40 -135)
77 (40 -135)
90 (40 -135)
90 (40 -135)
86 (40 · 135)
83 (40 -135)
67 (40 -135)
82 (40 -135)
STL -Sacramento (916) 373 -5600
Matrix .•.••••.. : WATER
UNITS METHOD
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
pg/L SW846 8290
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I SAMPLE#
OOl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I G2F240172
QC DATA ASSOCIATION SUMMARY
G2F240l72
Sample Preparation and Analysis c,,ntrol Numbers
MATRIX
WATER
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
SW646 6290
LEACH
BATCH#
STL -Sacramento (916) 373 -5600
PREP
BATCH#
2162351
MS RUN#
I 16019
METHOD BLANK REPOR1:
Trace Level Organic Comp::nu,ds
Client Lot # ... : G2F240172 Work Order # ... , E33KAJ.AA Matrix ......... : WATER
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MB Lot-Sample#: G2G010000-351
Prep Date .•.... : 06/30/02
Analysis Date .. : 07/08/02 Prep Batch fl ... : 2182,.51
Dilution Factor: 1
DETECTJJ)N
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD
2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.71 pg/L SW846 8290
Total TCDD ND 0. 71 pg/L SW846 8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 1.2 pg/L SW846 8290
Total PeCDD ND 1.2 pg/L SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 0.71 pg/L SW846 8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 0.78 pg/L SW846 8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND 0.68 pg/L SW846 8290
Total HxCDD ND 0.78 pg/L SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 1.2 pg/L SW846 8290
Total HpCDD ND 1.2 pg/L SW846 8290
OCDD ND 6.5 pg/L SW846 8290
2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.77 pg/L SW846 8290
Total TCDF ND 0.77 pg/L SW846 8290
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND o. 72 pg/L SW846 8290
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 0.70 pg/L SW846 8290
Total PeCDF ND 0.72 pg/L SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.75 pg/L SW846 8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0. 78 pg/L SW846 8290
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 0.79 pg/L SW846 8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 0.83 pg/L SW846 .8290
Total HxCDF ND 0.83 pg/L SW846 8290
1, 2, 3 ,4, 6., 7, 8-HpCDF ND 0. 84 pg/L SW846 8290
1, 2, 3, 4, 7,a·, 9-HpCDF ND 0.95 pg/L SW846 8290
Total HpCDF ND 0.95 pg/L SW846 8290
OCDF ND 0.90 pg/L SW846 8290
PERCENT RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS RECOVERY LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 53 (40 -135)
i3C-1,2,3;7,8-PeCDD 60 (40 -135)·
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 63 (40 -ns)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 85 (40 -135)
13C-OCDD 85 (40 -135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 51 (40 -135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 55 (40 -135)
13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 47 (40 -135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 67 (40 -135)
NOTB(S):
Calculation, are performed before rounding to avoid round-off enors m calcula!C<I results. -----•
I
G2F240172 STL -Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DJITA REPORT
Trace Level Organic Compounds
Client Lot# ... , G2F240172 Work Order# ... , E33KlllAC Matrix ......... , WATER
LCS Lot-Sample#, G2G010000-351
Prep Date ...... , 06/30/02 Analysis Date .. , 07/0B/02
Prep Batch# •.. , 2182351
Dilution Factor: 1
SPIKE MEASURED PERCENT
PARAMETER AMOUNT AMOUNT UNITS RECOVERY METHOD
2, 3, 7, 8-TCDD 200 200 pg/L 100 SW846 8290
1,2,3, 7_, 8-PeCDD 1000 1020 pg/L 102 SW846 8i!90 ' 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1000 807 pg/L 81 SW846 8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1000 1010 pg/L 101 SW846 8290
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1000 1320 pg/L 132 SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 1000 1060 pg/L 106 SW846 8i!90
OCDD 2000 2030 pg/L 102 SW846 8290
2,3,7,8-TCDF 200 204 p<J/L 102 SW846 8290
1.,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 1000 996 pg/L 100 SW846 8290
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1000 777 pg/L 78 SW846 8290
1.,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF l.000 1020 p9/L l.02 SW846 8290
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF l.000 l.270 P9/L 127 SW846 8290
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1000 1700 a pg/L 170 SW846 8290
' 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1000 1650 a pg/L l.65 SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1000 1050 pg/L 105 SW846 8290
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 1000 1250 pg/L 125 SW846 8i!90
OCDl' 2000 1940 P9/L 97 SW846 8290
PERCENT RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY LIMITS
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 59 (40 -135)
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 59 (40 -135)
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 67 (40 -135)
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 85 (40 -135)
13C-OCDD 85 (40 -135)
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 58 (40 -135)
13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 55 (40 -135)
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 51 (40 -135)
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 69 (40 -135)
· NOTE (S) ,
Calculations arc performed before rounding kl avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
Bold prim denotes control parametcn
a Spik'Jd analytc recovery 1s ouaidc stated control limits..
G2F240172 STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600 I 8 of 9
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUI\TION REPORT
Trace Level Organic Compomtds
Client Lot 11 ... : G2F240172 Work Order 1/ •.• : E33Khl.l\C
LCS Lot-Sample#: G2G010000-351
Prep Date ...... : 06/30/02 Analysis Date .. : 07/0El/02
Prep Batch# ... : 2182351
Dilution Factor: 1
PERCENT RECOVERY
PARAMETER RECOVERY LIMITS
2,3,7,8-TCDD 100 (75 -126)
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 102 (82 -124)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD Bl (70 -135)
; 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 101 (76 -127)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 132 (66 -142)
l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 106 (82 -124)
OCDD 102 (82 -128)
2,3,7,8-TCDF 102 (70 -132)
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 100 (74 -131)
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 78 (62 -137)
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 102 (84 -124)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 127 (75 -128)
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 170 a (71 -146)
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 165 a (73 -144)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 105 (74 .-131)
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 125 (73 -135)
OCDF 97 (70 -142)
PERCENT
INTERNAL STANDARD RECOVERY
. 13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD 59
. 13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 59
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 67
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 85
13C-OCDD 85
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 58
13C-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 55
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 51
13C-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 69
NOTE(S):
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid roUDd-off crron in calculated results.
Bold print dcnoteS control parameters
· a Spiked analytc recovery is outside stated control limits.
G2F240172 STL • Sacramento (916) 373 • 5600
Matrix ......... : WATER
METHOD
SW'846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW'846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
Sli/846 8290
SW846. 8290
SW846 8290
Sli/846 8290
Sli/846 8290
Sl'1846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
SW846 8290
RBCOVERY
LIMITS
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
(40 -135)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I