NCD003200383_20010411_Koppers Co. Inc._FRBCERCLA RA_Third Quarter 2000 Groundwater Monitoring Report - Revised-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
December I 8, 2000
Revised April 11, 2001
Ms. Beverly Hudson
Remedial Project Manager
USEPA -Region IV
North Supcrfund Remedial Branch
Waste Management Division
I 00 Alabama Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
.ThermoRetec
RETEC North Carolina, luc
A su/Jsilliary 1!( Tl1er1110R1•1<'c
Co11.rnlti11R C11r1>om/io11
1822 East NC Highway 5.1
Suitc !OO
Durham, NC 277 \J
(9!9) 484-2200 Phone
(919) 484-8 ! 00 Fa.,
www.thcnnorctcc.com
RE: Third Quarter 2000 Groundwater Monitoring Report for
Former Koppers Industries, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolin SLJPERFUND SECTION
RETEC North Carolina, Inc. Project No. BEAZ?-03624-103
Dear Ms. Hudson:
The results of the third quarter 2000 groundwater monitoring event for the former Koppers
Company, Inc. site in Morrisville, North Carolina are submitted by RETEC North Carolina, Inc.
on behalf of Beazer East, inc. This report documents the field and laboratory results of the
groundwater monitoring event that was performed September 27, 2000. Enclosed is a copy of
the third quarter 2000 analytical results (Enclosure I).
The third quarter 2000 monitoring event included gauging the water levels in 47 wells and
sampling and analyzing six of these wells (C-IOB, C-14A, C-14B, C-29B, M-04 and PW-01)
shown in Figure I (Enclosure 2). All groundwater samples were analyzed for pentachlorophenol
and 2,4-dichlorophenol by Method 8270C -Select Ion Monitoring. Samples from wells C-14B,
C-29B and PW-I were analyzed for dioxins and furans by Method 8290.
Groundwater elevations for the A-, B-, and C-Zone wells measured on September 27, 2000 arc
presented in Table I (Enclosure 3). These elevations were used to construct the groundwater
contour maps shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4 (Enclosure 2). Groundwater flow for the site is
generally to the northeast and south-southwest from a ridge that roughly bisects the site.
The analytical results of groundwater samples from six wells arc summarized in Table 2
(Enclosure 3) and are reported with any necessary data validation qualifiers: Pentachlorophenol
was detected in groundwater samples from C-14A, Cl4B, C-29B, M-04, and PW-01. The
detection limit for the sample from well M-04 was elevated because the low yield of water from
the well limited the sample volume giving a result of I. I U µg/L for this sample. A review of
the laboratory data showed that pentachlorophenol was detected below the analytical detection
limit at a concentration of 0.88 J µg/L where the J qualifier indicates that this result is estimated.
Dioxins and furans were detected in groundwater samples from wells C-14A, C-29B, and PW-I
as shown on Table 2. Table 3 shows the concentrations of dioxins and furans detected rcponcd
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Beverly Hudson
December 18, 2000
Revised April 11, 2001
Page 2
.ThermoRetec
with their calculated Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) concentration. The TEQ concentration
is calculated by multiplying the concentration of each dioxin or furan by its respectiYe Toxicity
Equivalent Factor (TEP). The resulting TEQ concentrations arc then summed to dctc1minc the
total TEQ.
The Record of Decision (ROD) for this site requires that groundwater meet the cleanup standards
of 1 µ.g/L for pentachlorophenol, of 20 µ.g/L for 2,4-dichlorophenol, and of 30 pg/L for dioxins
and furans. Table 3 (Enclosure 3) shows analytical results from the third quarter 2000 sampling
event that exceeds these cleanup standards. The cleanup standard for pentachlorophenol is
exceeded in samples from wells C-14A, Cl4B, C-29B, and PW-01 but not in well M-04. The
sample from well C-14A also exceeds the cleanup standard for dioxins and furans.
In accordance with the USEPA-approved Groundwater Monitoring Program, quarterly sampling
of all wells with reported results above the specified cleanup levels will continue until four
consecutive sampling events indicate that the concentrations of pentachlorophenol and 2,--1-
dichlorophenol meet the cleanup levels. Since pentachlorophenol has continued to be detected in
groundwater samples from wells C-14A, Cl4B, C-29B, and PW-01, these wells will be sampled
during the fourth quarter monitoring event. Well M-04 will be placed on an annual monitoring
schedule. Dioxins and furans will be analyzed semi-annually in wells in which
pentachlorophenol is detected, so these constituents will not be analyzed again until the first
quarter 2001 monitoring event.
If you have any questions regarding these results, please call Michael Helbling of Beazer at (41:)
208-8867 or Laura Kelmar at [phone].
Sincerely,
RETEC North Carolina, Inc.
(' w e--(j,,,_ t . -~1/i {, 1...()
Carolyn A. Bach!
Project Geologist
Enclosures
ThermoRetec Consulting Corporation
,j_{,,<0< c,._ f:,_,f..,n1.c,.; / CA(}.
Laura A. Kelmar, P.E.
Groundwater Sampling
Program Manager
cc: D. Mattison -No11h Carolina Department of Natural Resources
M. Helbling -Beazer East, Inc.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
I
Enclosure 1
Third Quarter 2000 Analytical Results
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client \Vork l\oduct
Pri\'atc and ConfidcnLial
Fin:il
Data Evaluation Report
Site: Beazer/Raleigh, Morrisville
Program/Event: CERCLA Groundwater Monitoring!Q3-00
Laboratory: Severn Trent Laboratory-Pittsburgh
Analyses: Pentachlorophenol and 2 ,4-Dichlorophenol by SW 82 70C Select
Ion Monitoring (SIM)
Dioxins and Furans by SW 8290
Laboratory Lot Numbers: STL: C0I280l44
Alta: 9154
Evaluator: Gregory A. Malzone
Date: November 20, 2000
The Raleigh, Morrisville Q3-00 data reports from Severn Trent Laboratory-Pittsburgh and Alta
Analytical Laboratory were evaluated using USEPA Nntio,wl Fu11ctio11n/ Guideli11es and method
specifications. Each issue requiring comment and/or data qualification is addressed below. Qualified
results are listed in balded text.
Pentachlorophenol and 2,4-Dichlorophenol by SW 8270C SIM
I.
2.
Surrogate Recoveries: A 20-fold dilution was required for sample C-29B to bring the
Pcntachlorophenol concentration into the calibration range of the GC/MS instrument
system. This dilution was sufficiently high to dilute out the surrogates. Method
accuracy and extraction efficiency cannot be assessed for this sample. However, there
were sufficient acceptable quality control check results to show that the analytical
process was in control. No data qualifications were necessary based on professional
judgement.
Matrix Spike Recoveries: Sample C-1 OB was designated in the field to be processed as
the quality control check sample for this round. The C-1 OB MS/MSD recoveries for
Pentachlorophenol were 176% and 171 %. Both were greater than upper adviso.ry limit
of 140%. USEPJ\ Natio11ai Fu11ctio1wl Guiddi11es do not require global data qualification
based on organic matrix spike data alone. However, a high bias attributabk to matrix
effects is indicated for sample C-1 OB. The l'cntachlorophenol result for C-1 OB was a
non-detect. Nu data qualifications are necessary.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lleazer/Ralcigh, QJ-00
Data Evaluation Report
!'age 2 of 2
Client \·Vork PruJu1._·t
Pri,·atc and ConfidLntial
Fin:tl
II
3. Elevated Reporting Limits: Well M-04 generated limited sample rnlume. Onlv 'J()(J
mis of sarnpk were available for extraction instead of one litt.:r. This reduced sample
volume raist:d the reporting limits by 10%. In order to assc.ss whether the
l'entaehlorophenol result for M-04 exceeded the clean-up goal of 1.0 µg/L. the
laborawry was requested to review the raw data and report to the ivtl)L. There \\':t~ a
slight l'cntachlorophcnol n..'sult. estimated at 0.89 µ.g/L, for J\,1.().-1. This result doc~ :"!ot
exceed the dean-up goal. This well will be monitored next quarter bu1 will not require
Dioxin and Furan analysis.
Dioxins & Furans by SW 8290
2.
Blank Contamination: The following analytcs were detected in the method and field
blanks associated with this sample delivery group. USEl'A N11tio1llll F1111ctio1111/
Guidelines require that associated samples, with analytc concentrations up to five times
the level detected in the blank ( 10 times for OCDD), be qualified "U," as undetected.
because of contamination.
Blank ID
MBOO I
Equipment Blank
Field Blank
Contaminant
OCDD
OCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
Concentration Level (pg/L)
48.6
102
42.5
206
As required by USEl'A Nntio,wl F1111ctio11nl Cui,lc/i11cs, the data were evaluated and
qualified using the highest contaminant concentrations. The OCDD result for sample
PW-0 I required qualification because of field contamination.
Sample ID Analvte Reported Result (pg/L) Qualified Result (pg/L)
OCDD 69.2 69.2 U
Method Calibration Limits: Results reported below the lower method calibration limit
(i.e., the lowest calibration standard concentration) were flagged with the Alta
qualifier "A." Each result reported below the method calibration limit requires a 'T
qualifier, as an estimated concentration, because of the variability below the lowes1
calibration. standard.
Field ID
C-2913
C-14A
Compound
1,2 ,3,4,7 ,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7 ,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7 ,8-HxCDF
Qualified Result (pg/L)
14.5 J
I 5.0 J
I I. I J
22.4 J
17.4 J
25. 9 J
20.4 J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/1..
ALTA
November 29, 2000
Alta Batch I.D.: 9154
Mr. Gregory Malzone
ThennoRetec Consulting Corporation
3040 William Pitt Way
Pittsburgh, PA 15238-1359
Dear Mr. Malzone,
Enclosed are the results for the five aqueous samples received at Alta Analytical Laboratory on
September 28, 2000. This work was authorized under HARP ID# 0530-0540-1000. These
samples were extracted and analyzed using EPA Method 8290 for tetra to octa chlorinated dioxins
and dibenzofurans. A standard turnaround time was requested for this work.
The following report consists of a Sample Inventory (Section I), Analytical Results (Section IT) and
the Appendix. The Appendix contains a copy of the chain-of-custody, a list of data qualifiers and
abbreviations, our current certifications, diskette deliverables, and copies of the raw data.
Alta Analytical Laboratory remains committed to serving you in the most effective manner.
Should you have any questions or need additional information and technical support, please do not
hesitate to contact me. Thank you for choosing Alta as part of your analytical support team.
Sincerely,
Alta Analytical Laboratory Inc.
5070 Robert J. Math<.-ws Parkway
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
FAX [phone]
[phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section I: Sample Inventory Report
Date Received: 9/28/00
Alta Lab. ID Client Sample ID
9154-00 I C-29B
9154-002 PW-01
9154-003 C-14A
9154-004 Equipment Blank
9154-005 Field Blank
I 1. --------··-_ ALTA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I SECTION II.
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I J., -.-\LTA
I PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
I Method Blank Date Extracted: 11/2/QQ Lah ID: MBOQI
Matrix: 8(1\l~Qll~ Sample Amount: I QQQ L QC Set: .LQ&l
I TEQ (Min-Max): Q Q486 -9.1 I Units: l2lUL
Compound Cone. DL b EMP!:;;' MDLd Qualifier
I 2,3, 7,8-TCDD ND 2.40 0. 71 I
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 3.19 2.53
I t,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 6.55 2.76
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 7.79 1.46
I 1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDD ND 6.72 2.49
l,2,3,4,6, 7,8-H pCDD ND 12.9 2.97
OCDD 48.6 6.93 A
I 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 2.10 0.243
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 2.48 5.42
I 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 2.32 4.42
l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 2.50 4.24
I 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 2.59 2.43
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 2.77 3.06
I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 3.98 1.80
1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-H pCD F ND 4.79 2.02
1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF ND 7.67 3.62
I OCDF ND 20.5 4.39
I Total TCDD ND 2.40
Total PeCDD ND 3.19
I Total HxCDD ND 7.01
Total HpCDD ND 12.9
I
Total TCDF ND 2.10
Total PeCDF ND 2.40
Total HxCDF ND 2.91
I Total HpCDF ND 6.05
I
I
Page I of 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
Method Blank
Lab ID: MBOO I
Internal Standards
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
13C-1,2,3,7,8-i'cCDD
13C-l,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD
I 3C-l ,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD
l 3C-l ,2,3,4,6, 7,8-H pCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
l 3C-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF
13C-2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF
13C-1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF
13C-1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
Clean-up Recovery Standard
37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD
Analysis Dates
DB-5: 11/4/00
PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
%R
68.4
73. l
78.4
77.1
73.2
67.4
71.3
68.0
72.5
67.8
71.7
71.5
70.4
67.7
68.9
60.9
94.2
a. Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) based on USEPA Toxic Equivalent Factors.
b. Sample specific estimated detection limit.
c. Estimated maximum possible concentration
d. Method Detection Limit
e. Lower Control Limit R Upper Control Limit
Analyst: HS Pa~c 2 of 2
Ji.. -ALTA
QC Set: I 084
LCL-UCL' Qualifier
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40-135
40 -135
Reviewer: :~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ji.. -------------------------------------ALTA
Method Blank
Lab ID: MBOOI
Internal Standards
IJC-2,3,7,8-TCDD
i3C-i,2,3, 7,8-PcCDD
I 3C-l ,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD
I 3C-l ,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD
l 3C-1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF
13C-2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF
l 3C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
l 3C-1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCD F
13C-2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF
13C-l,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
Clean-up Recovery Standard
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
Analysis Dates
DB-5: 11/4/00
PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
%R
68.4
73.i
78.4
77.1
73.2
67.4
71.3
68.0
72.5
67.8
71.7
71.5
70.4
67.7
68.9
60.9
94.2
LCL-UCL'
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
a. Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) based on USEPA Toxic Equivalent Factors.
b. Sample specific estimated detection limit.
c. Estimated maximum possible concentration
d. Method Detection Limit
c. Lower Control Limit -Upper Control Limit
Analyst: RS Page 2 of 2
QC Set: I 084
Qualifier
Re·•iewer: -·-·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
OPR RESULTS
Lab ID: QPRQQI
Matrix: Aqueous
Compound
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PcCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCD F
2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCD F
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCD F
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4, 7 ,8,9-H pCD F
OCDF
PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
Date Received: NA
Date Extracted: I 1 /2/QQ
Sample Amount: 1.000 L
Spike Cone.
~ Found
10.0 8.96
50.0 47.8
50.0 51.2
50.0 45.3
50.0 47.9
50.0 46.5
100 97.7
10.0 8.99
50.0 50.0
50.0 49.8
50.0 48.8
50.0 47.1
50.0 48.4
50.0 47.1
50.0 49.0
50.0 51.0
100 110
Page I of 2
1. -ALTA
QC Set: .L.Q£±
Units: ng/mL
QPR Limits
7 -13
35 -65
35 -65
35-65
35-65
35 -65
70 -130
7 -13
35-65
35-65
35 -65
35-65
35-65
35-65
35-65
35 -65
70-130
I Ji.. -·--· -----~-·----.-\LTA
I PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
I OPR RESULTS QC Set: l.D.lH Lab ID: OPROOl
I Spike
Internal Standards ~ %R OPR Limits
13C-2,3, 7,8-TCDD IOO 64.5 40 -135 I I 3C-l,2,3, 7,8-PcCDD 100 68.6 40 -135
13C-l,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD 100 79.6 40 -135
I 13C-l,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD 100 76.7 40 -135
13C-1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD 100 76.4 40 -135
I 13C-OCDD 200 75.7 40 -135
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF 100 66.5 40 -135
I 13C-l,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 100 62.2 40 -135
13C-2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 100 69.3 40 -135
I 13C-l,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF IOO 67.2 40 -135
13C-l,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF 100 70.0 40 -135
I 13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 100 73.3 40 -135
13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 100 76.4 40 -135
I 13C-1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF 100 71.9 40 -135
13C-1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCD F 100 75.4 40 -135
13C-OCDF 200 71.3 40 -135
I Spike
Clcan-ul! Rcc2vcry Standard ~ %R OPR Limits
I 37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD 40.0 91.8 40 -135
Analysis Dates
I DB-5: 11/4/00
I
I
I
r ' I ,-, ' Analyst: RS Page 2 of 2 Re\'iewer: ~
I
I J. -ALTA
I PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
I Sample ID: C-298 Lab ID: 9154-QQI
Proicct: BEAZER/RALEIGH QC Set: .LQM
I Matrix: l:',QlleQ\l~ Date Received: 9/28/QQ ¾Solids: NA
Sample Amount: 0.979 L Date Extracted: I 1/2/Q0 Units: pglL
I 'TEQ (Min-Max): I 0.8 -16.0
Compound Cone. DLb EMPC C MDL d O11:ilifier
I 2,3,7,8-TCDO ND 1.21 0.711
1,2,3,7,8-PcCDD ND 2.18 2.53
I 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 14.5 2.76 A
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 15.0 1.46 A
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCD D ND 4.23 2.49
I 1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD 344 2.97
OCDD 3650 6.93 B
I 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.819 0.243
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 2.24 5.42
I 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND 2.19 4.42
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 2.25 4.24
I 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 2.39 2.43
2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCD F ND 2.56 3.06
I 1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCD F ND 3.68 1.80
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 55.1 2.02
I 1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF ND 6.68 3.62
OCDF 249 4.39
I Total TCDD ND 1.21
Total PeCDD ND 2.18 I Total HxCDD 54.4
Total HpCDD 606
' I Total TCDF ND 0.819
Total PeCDF 6.23
I Total HxCDF 62.4
Total HpCDF 245
I
Page I of2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample ID: C-298
Lab ID: 9154-001
Internal Standards
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
I 3C-l ,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD
13C-l,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD
13C-I ,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD
13C-I ,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3, 7,8-TCD F
I 3C-I ,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF
I 3C-2,3,4, 7,8-PeCD F
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
I 3C-2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF
13C-1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-H pCDF
13C-OCDF
Clean-up Recovery Standard
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
%.R
93.9
88.0
94.9
90.6
89.3
91.0
101
96.5
98.3
83.0
84.4
85.3
87.3
79.9
87.0
68.6
95.7
Analysis Dates
DB-5: 11/4/00 DB-225: NA
LCL-UCL'
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40-135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
a. Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) based on USEPA Toxic Equivalent Factors.
b. Sample specific estimated detection limit.
c. Estimated maximum oossible concentration
d. Method Detection Limit
e. Lower control limit -uooer control limit
Analyst: RS Page 2 of 2
1. -:\LTA
Qualifier
Reviewer:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
Sample ID:
Project:
PW-01
BEAZER/RALEIGH
Matrix: Aqueous Date Received:
Sample Amount: 0.993 L Date Extrncted:
TEQ (Min-Max): 0.0692 -6.54
Compound Cone.
2,3,7,8-TCDD ND
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-H pCDD ND
OCDD 69.2
2,3, 7,8-TCD F ND
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF ND
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF ND
2,3,4,6, 7,8-H xCD F ND
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCD F ND
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF ND
1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-H pCD F ND
OCDF ND
Total TCDD ND
Total PeCDD ND
Total HxCDD ND
Total HpCDD ND
Total TCDF ND
Total PeCDF ND
Total HxCDF ND
Total HpCDF ND
Page 1 of2
9/28/00
11/2/00
DLb
1.24
2.48
5.10
5.78
5.11
13.9
1.67
1.72
1.90
2.00
2.34
2.09
3.31
2.88
4.39
7.70
1.24
2.48
5.33
13.9
1.67
1.81
2.40
3.54
EMPC C
Lab ID: 91 ~4-002
QC Set: I .OX4
¾Solids: NA
Units: pg/L
:\IDL d Qualifier
0.711
2.53
2.76
1.46
2.49
2.97
6.93 B
0.243
5.42
4.42
4.24
2.43
3.06
1.80
2.02
3.62
4.39
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample ID: PW-0 I
Lab ID: 9154-002
Internal Standards
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
I 3C-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCD D
13C-l ,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-l,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCD F
13C-l,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF
13C-l,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF
13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
l 3C-l,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCD F
13C-l,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
Clean-up Recovery Standard
3 7CI-2,3, 7,8-TCD D
PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
.½.R
72.7
75.3
80.4
66.0
69.0
67.6
73.7
75.7
75.5
69.1
60.3
69.6
67.l
62.8
63.1
47.2
92.5
Analysis Dates
DB-5: 11/4/00 DB-225: NA
a. Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) based on USEPA Toxic Equivalent Factors.
b. Samole soecific estimated detection limit.
c. Estimated maximum possible concentration
d. Method Detection Limit
e. Lower control limit -uoocr control limit
Analyst: RS Page 2 of2
Ji.. -ALTA
' LCL-UCL Qualifier
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
Rc\'icwcr:
I Ji.. -ALTA
I PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
I Sample ID: C-14A Lab ID: 2154-QQ~
Project: BEAZER/RALEIGH OC Set: .LQM
I Matrix: AQUCQU~ Date Received: I 0/28/QQ %Solids: ~
Sample Amount: 0.916 L Date Extracted: 11/2/00 Units: p,;/L
a TEQ (Min-Max): 91.1 -95.5 I Compound Cone. DLb EMPC C MDL d Qualifier
I 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 2.13 0.711
1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 11.1 2.53 A
I 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 22.4 2.76 A
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 138 1.46
1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCD D 70.2 2.49
I 1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-H pCDD 2530 2.97
OCDD 23200 6.93 B
I 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 1.64 0.243
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 2.46 5.42
I 2,3,4, 7 ,8-PeCD F ND 2.41 4.42
1 ,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 17.4 4.24 A
I 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 25.9 2.43 A
2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF 20.4 3.06 A
I 1 ,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 7.64 1.80
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCD F 537 2.02
I 1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-H pCD F 36.1 3.62
OCDF 1930 4.39
I Total TCDD ND 2.13
Total PeCDD 11.1
I Total HxCDD 481
Total HpCDD 3990
I Total TCDF ND 1.64
Total PeCDF 90.1 95.2
I Total HxCDF 555 584
Total HpCDF 1850
I
Page I of 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample ID: C-14A
Lab ID: 9154-003
Internal Standards
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
13C-l,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
13C-l,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCD D
13C-l,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF
13C-1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C-l,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
Clean-up Recovery Standard
37Cl-2,3,7,8-TCDD
PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
%R
72.8
67.6
66.2
62.1
54.9
48.0
77.8
64.3
68.4
57.2
60.7
60.8
59.8
50.5
52.2
40.2
87.4
Analysis Dates
DB-5: 11/4/00 DB-225: NA.
a. Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) based on USEPA Toxic Equivalent Factors.
b. Samolc specific estimated detection limit.
c. Estimated maximum possible concentration
d. Method Detection Limit
e. Lower control limit -uooer control limit
Analyst: RS Page 2 orz
/1;. -:\LTA
C LCL-UCL Qualifier
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40-135
40-135
40-135
40 -135
Re\'icwer:
I 1 .. -ALTA
I PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
I Sample ID: EQuipmcnt Bl,mk Lab ID: 21~4-QQ4
Project: BEAZER/RALEIGH QC Set: .L.QR1
I Matrix: AQUCQU~ Date Received: 2/28/QQ %Solids: NA
Sample Amount: 0.988 L Date Extracted: 11/2/00 Units: ru:/1
I 'TEQ (Min-Max): 0.102 -6.08
Compound ~ DLb EMPC C MDL d Qualifier
I 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 1.24 0.711
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 1.68 2.53
I 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 4.66 2.76
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 5.21 1.46
I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND 4.63 2.49
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD ND 15.6 2.97
OCDD 102 6.93 B
I 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 1.39 0.243
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 1.54 5.42
I 2,3,4, 7 ,8-PeCD F ND 1.42 4.42
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 2.59 4.24
I 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF ND 2.45 2.43
2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF ND 2.64 3.06
I 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF ND 3.99 1.80
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF ND 7.45 2.02
I 1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF ND 11.8 3.62
OCDF ND 9.38 4.39
I Total TCDD ND 1.24
I Total PeCDD ND 1.68
Total HxCDD ND 4.83
Total HpCDD ND 15.6
I Total TCDF ND 1.39
Total PeCDF ND 1.48
I Total HxCDF ND 2.86
Total HpCDF ND 9.38
I
I
Page I of2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample IO:
Lab ID:
Equipment Blank
9154-004
Internal Standards
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDD
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
13C-l ,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCD F
13C-2,3,4,7,8-PeCD F
13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-l,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-l,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF I 13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
Clean-up Recovery Standard
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
%R
64.8
64.5
83.9
74.8
73.2
67.4
67.9
63.2
72.7
69.3
73.9
75.3
74.2
67.2
68.9
57.l
80.7
Analysis Dates
DB-5: 11/4/00 DB-225: NA
LCL-UCL'
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40-135
40-135
40 -135
40-135
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a. Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) based on USEPA Toxic Equivalent Factors.
b. Sample specific estimated detection limit.
c. Estimated maximum possible concentration
d. Method Detection Limit
c. Lower control limit -uooer control limit
Analyst: RS Page 2 or2 Reviewer:
1. -:\LTA
Qualifier
I , .. -.-\LT.-\
I PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
I Sample ID: Field Blank Lab JD: 21 ~-l-Q(6
Project: BEAZER/RALEfQ!-1 QC Set: .L.Q.8
I Matrix: AQllCQ!.!S Date Received: 2/28/QQ %Solids: NA
Sample Amount: 0.226 L Date Extracted: I I /2/00 Units: pg1,_
I 'TEQ (Min-Max): 0. 702 -16.1
Compound Cone. DLb EMPC C MDL J Qualifier
I 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 1.73 0.711
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD ND 5.32 2.53
I 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ND 22.6 2.76
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD ND 23.6 1.46
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ND 21.7 2.49 I 1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-H pCDD 42.5 2.97
OCDD 206 6.93 B
I 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 1.90 0.243
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ND 3.85 5.42
I 2,3,4, 7 ,8-PeCD F ND 3.41 4.42
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF ND 3.91 4.24
I 1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF ND 4.15 2.43
2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCD F ND 3.96 3.06
I 1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCD F ND 6.36 1.80
1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF ND 13.3 2.02
I 1,2,3,4, 7 ,8,9-H pCD F ND 17.9 3.62
OCDF 71.0 4.39
I Total TCDD ND 1.73
Total PeCDD ND 5.32
I Total HxCDD ND 22.6
Total HpCDD 42.5
I Total TCDF ND 1.90
Total PeCDF ND 3.63
I Total HxCDF 13.3
Total HpCDF 75.8
I
Page I of 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample ID: Field Blank
Lab ID: 9154-005
Internal Standards
13C-2,3, 7,8-TCDD
13C-l ,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD
13C-l ,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
13C-l ,2,3,4,6,7,8-H pCDD
13C-OCDD
13C-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C-2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF
13C-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
13C-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
13C-2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF
13C-l ,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
13C-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
13C-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
13C-OCDF
Clean-up Recovery Standard
37CI-2,3,7,8-TCDD
PCDD & PCDF
EPA METHOD 8290
¾R
71.1
70.9
82.0
77.4
73.6
69.3
73.5
71.2
77.6
71.2
72.5
78.1
75.6
68.3
70.5
61.1
94.7
Analysis Dates
DB-5: 11/4/00 DB-225: M
a. Toxic Equivalent Quotient (TEQ) based on USEPA Toxic Equivalent Factors.
b. Sample soecific estimated detection limit.
c. Estimated maximum possible concentration
d. Method Detection Limit
e. Lower control limit -upper control limit
Analyst: RS Page 2 of 2
LCL-UCL' Qualifier
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40-135
40-135
40 -135
40-135
40-135
40 -135
40 -135
40-135
40 -135
40-135
40-135
40 -135
Reviewer:
c:: ,°")
·._ .....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
B
C
I)
E
F
G
H
I
Cone.
D.L.
NA
SIN
*
ND
MPC
DATA QUALIFIERS & ABBREVIATIONS
The amount detected is below the Method
Calibration Limit.
This compound was also detected in the blank.
The amount detected is less than five times the Method
Quantitation Limit.
The amount reported is the maximum possible concentration.
The detection limit was raised above the Method Quantitation
Limit due to chemical interferences.
This result has been confirmed on a DB-225 column.
This result has been confirmed on a SP-2331 column.
The signal-to-noise ratio is greater than 10:1.
Chemical Interference
Concentration
Detection Limit
Not applicable
Signal-to-noise
See Cover Letter
Not Detected
Maximum Possible Concentration
1£. -. .\LL\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CURRENT CERTIFICATIONS
Bureau of Reclamation -Mid-Pacific Region -(MP-470, Res-1.10)
Commonwealth of Kentucky -(Certificate No. 90063)
Commonwealth of Virginia
State of Alaska -(Certificate No. OS-00197)
State of Arkansas Department of Health -(Approval granted through CA certification)
State of Arkansas Department of Pollution Control
State of California -(Certificate No. 1640)
State of Connecticut -(Certificate No. PH-0182)
State of Florida -(Certificate No. 87456)
State of Nevada -(Certificate No. CA413)
State of New York Department of Health -(Certificate No. 1141 I)
State of North Carolina -(Certification No. 06700)
State of North Dakota Department of Health -(Certificate No. R-078)
State of Oregon
State of Pennsylvania -(Certificate No. 68-490)
State of South Carolina -(Certificate No. 87002001)
State of Tennessee -(Certificate No. 02996)
State of Utah -(Certificate No. E-201)
State of Wisconsin -(Certificate No. 998036160)
State of Wyoming -(Ref: SES-LB)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
U.S. EPA Region 5
Washington Department of Ecology -(Certification No. C091)
1-17-97
1~ -.-\LTA
Chain of
Custody Record
OUA4124 0797
Client -n .. .._ P,,-t-;,,.
Address
"vin R~I/,, 4ve,
c;ry
(', ·-J ln'A-I z;p ~·, 'l 2-
Project Name ~ 0 ~ ;,,\,_ R o"?-".r
Conimct!Purchsse Ordd tOuote No. '
Sample I.D. No. and Description Date
(Containers for each sample may be combined on one line)
C-lr./1+ ,d i,1/00 .
.
I UIS
A-LTA-
ProaM•ir; · · 1-t-a.-R-,.A
Doto ,I \ Jo "2-1 oo
Chain of Cu!:lody Numb'o 7 2 5 4
(c/~v(n7•~ ,o:•);;:;umber
Lab Nulnbor { I Psge of
Sffe Contact Lnb Contact Analysis (Attach /isl if
more soace is needed)
a
Csrrler/Waybl/1 Number
.~
Special Instructions/
Containers &
Conditions of Receipt
Matrix " Preservatives -~
l ~ ~ ~ 5 !5 -g 0 ,ti Time ~ ~ "' ~ "' § ~ ! ~ ~
I loo IV: 'f. )(
.
~ible Hazard /dentific.a.tion 1 Ssmpfe Disposal (A lee may be assessed If samples are retained
Non-Hazard D Flammable 0 $kin Irritant D Polson a D Unknov.TI O Return To Cllent f1ro1spossl By LBb 0 Archive For Months longer than 3 months)
Tum Around Time Required
QC Requirements (Specify)
D 24 Hours D 48 Hours D 7 Days O 14 Dsys O 21 Dsys
1. Relinquished By Time
{6ex,
Tims Time
vdi
Time
Comments
,;;;, 'i J.§), ~·"It §] .,_,e:
:, I
,Y • uoc -------
Chain of
Custody Record
STL-41;,.1 (0700)
Clienr
· 1--; / 17-'7 //10 )<£,!-, { r=-C
J..Cdrf:~S
300 /J A//,r /,/ AV£ , Su f77.Z-, .7c'.l Z...
Cl/y 1:;;_ I bp ;o;; YL-
{,r\,-JCo$J
Pr;;c;;v;;,e ;~ocatio//)r (£/ 6_ff_ //VC
ComracVPurchase OrdrwOuote No.
Sample 1.0. No. and Description Date
(Comainers for each sample may be combined on one line)
r 2.q ,e. 9 / ~t.,,/CXJ
/Jw,-of
C-1'{ A
r::'Ar 1 A • 1 111L1.,Jr .
Cr., /1 ,,,,,A 'K--\ I/
Possiote Hazard lden/lfJcation
····-
-s lir'ff@?t E;: b.t II,
Oa/9 'J} _14 / 0 0
Chain of Custody Number
Projuc/ Marwgur 001676 Rn,"\-/?.A _,,
Ty.'ephone Number (Area Code)IFex Number Lab Num!Jer I 01 I fl.ff/% Page
l'-f Ill j ,TI/ /t.,,'2-L , 3'7 /
S11e Contact Lab Contact ' Analysis (Attach list If
more s ace is needed) -
L~I~ ~
Carrier/Waybill Number ... Special Instructions/ F&lJ~&'>C -~{ Condition.s of Receipt
Containers & '.:; -"'
Matrix Preservative's i ,._ I:: ..
I I 0 ~ a "a 0 i;,a
Time ~ ~ 0 iJ <S ~ 'i' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ X X
(/SC) 1·v j\ t-L ) -2 /S-!D
l'IS"b I
19)0
'J
l'I\D I' I\ ,, 12
I Sample Disposal (A Jee may be assessed if samples are retained
0 Flammable 0 Skin Irritant D Poison B D Unknown O Return To Client 0 Disposal By Lab D Archive Fo~ Months longer than 3 months)
0 Non-Hazard
Turn Around Time Required QC Requirements (Specify)
D 24 Hours 0 48 Hours
1. Relinquished By
2. Relinquished By
3. Relinquished By Date 3. Received By
Comments ---------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Attach men\ 1 O. B.1
SAMPLE LOG-IN CHECKLIST
ALTA Project No.: 3~15~'1~---ClicnUProtocol No. ____ /J__,L-;.A-.c_ ____ _
I. Date Samples Arrived: q-?$-o7) Initials: JU./ ~ Location: l,.,, /( -(
Time I Dale logged in: !._(J ~:too !_'700 J.Zld. Location: · Lu I<-/ -
2. Initials:
3. Samples Arrived By: (circle) ~UPS World Courier Olher:
~
4. Shipping Preservation: (circle) c::2§Y Blue Ice / Dry Ice / None Temp •c ( _)
YES NO NA
5. Shipping Container(s) Intact"? If not, describe condition in comment section. ><
6. Shipping Container(s) Custody Seals Present? y
Intact? If not intact, describe condition in comment section. 'f
7. Shipping Documentation Present? (circle) Shipping Label e0
Tracking Number 5r '.2. :Ztal, '"f £/ 1/. 2 <) s--><
8. Sample Custody Seal(s) Present? No. of Seals or Seal No. 'f
Intact? .If not intact, describe condition in comment section. >(
9. Sample Container Intact? If no, indicate sample condition in comment section. y
10. Chain of Custody (COC) or other Sample Documentation Present? y
11. COG/Documentation Acceptable? If no, complete COC Anomaly Form. >C
12. Shipping Container (circle): ALTA ~ ~or Return or Disposed
13. Container(s) and/or Bottle(s) Requested? ><
14. Sample Control Check In/Out Log Completed? (HRMS Only) ><
15. Drinking Water Sample? (HRMS Only) If yes, Acceptable Preservation? Y or N ;c
Preservation Info From? (circle) coc or Sample Container or None Noted
16. Number of Samples Received: w.lk'
Name:-------,--~---------(Signature Required for LCMS Only)
Date Samples Reconciled: _____ _
Comments:
SOP# CH10Br12, Page 4 of 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Attachment 1 0.B.1
SAMPLE LOG-IN CHECKLIST
AL TA Project No.: __ q~3~t9~---ClicnUProtocol No.~~-------
A
I (l/"1-J(CV ,__;✓,,/ l,.)/Z,(
I. Date Samples Arrived: Initials: "7 .. --Location:
'
2. Time/ Date logged in: /0/MoZJ !./i)_/J Initials:
'
~ Location: VK·c ,
3. Samples Arrived By: (circle) ('hdEx) UPS World Courier Ot11cr:
4. Sl1ipping Preservation: (circle) (ice} Blue Ice / Dry Ice / None Temp °C -7-
YES NO NA
5. Shipping Container(s) Intact"? If not, describe condition in comment section. >c
6. Shipping Container(s) Custody Seals Present? X
Intact? If not intact, describe condition in comment section. Y-
7. Shipping Documentation Present? (circle) Shipping Label ®> ;><
Tracking Number 'i? [ '}_ ,q 2/.,.,73.C/35
8. Sample Custody Seal(s) Present? No. of Seats or Seal No. '((_
Intact? .If not intact, describe condition in comment section. ~
9. Sample Container Intact? If no, indicate sample condition in comment section. 'y..
10. Chain of Custody (COC) or other Sample Documentation Present? y
11. COG/Documentation Acceptable? If no, complete COC Anomaly Form. 'f
12. Shipping Container (circle): ALT"(' Cli':_'V (Retain or Return or Disposed
----·
13. Container(s) and/or Bottle(s) Requested? )<
14. Sample Control Check In/Out Log Completed? (HRMS Only) )L-
. I
If yes, Acceptable Preservation? Y 15. Drinking Water Sample? (HRMS Only) or N f-
Preservation Info From? (circle) coc or . Sample Container or None Noted
16. Number of Samples Received: Al //1,
Name: _________________ _ Date Samples Reconciled: _____ _
(Signature Required for LCMS Only)
Comments:
SOP# CH10Br12. Page 4 of 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Enclosure 2
Figures
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LEGEND
D
a
Cl
c:J []
)
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
RAILROAD TRACKS
FENCELINE
DRAINAGE/STREAM
PROPERTY BOUNDARY -BEAZER EAST. INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY -UNIT STRUCTURES INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY -UNKNOWN
150 0 300 r---
SCALE: 1 "-300'
I I
c:=.=J
D
□ I]
0 0
.ThermoRetec
CJ
24 =z;,c----
0
()
GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM
BEAZER EAST, INC.
BEAV-03624-103
DATE: 12/00 ORWN: RCW Fil£: 3624CH02
0
/.j
~--
' \ -·--.___/'
I
/
I
/
/
/
Q
SITE LAYOUT
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY, INC. SITE
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FIGURE: 1
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
0
CJ D
2J Q
~
.ThermoRetec
oo
C09A+
359.63
D
(]
I I
c::==J
\J
0
c:?
0
_i,C03A TNA
. .r
.¾
js,
~
> C33A
V, 4.87
·-=-~--~~.:..-==-'---·--·
~
150 0 300 ,..._-.
SCAI.E: 1 "=300'
°"re 12/00
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
BEAZ7--03624-103
ORWN: DA ALE: 362-1.-CHOt
0
I
+
353.73
I
I
0
NM
/
0
LEGEND:
MONITORING WELL
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
AT WELL
NOT MEASURED
/
A.ZONE GROUNDWATER CONTOURS
SEPTEMBER 27, 2000
FIGURE: 2
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
0
D □
c:::::Cl [] oo
~
.ThermoRetec
I I
[=-=:J c::>
0
0 '(')
150 0
SCALE: 1 "=300'
·=-~·.,_~.:..· - . -.. - .
300
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
BEAll--03624-103
o.,.re 12/07 /00 DAWN: DA / BJB Fll..£: J624CH04
1,
LEGEND:
+ MONITORING WELL
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR
353. 73 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
AT WELL
NM NOT MEASURED
NOTE:
WELLS C-018 & C-1 OB NOT USED
IN CONTOURING
/
/
I -. __/
/ I
I ___ ,
I
I
I
/
B-ZONE GROUNDWATER CONTOURS
SEPTEMBER 27, 2000
FIGURE: 3
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I .ThermoRetec
_..,_ C17C
TNM
356
.-, C21C
TNM
JC z2::,;z:........-..-
325 0 650 ,...__,
SCALE: 1 "=650'
_.-, C23C
T NM
• CJ
+C24C
NM
..,_ C 1 6C
TNM
C33
/ 33 .1
I
I
I ¼ 3
/ 35
I
I
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
BEAV--03624-103
"'"' 12/06/00 ORWN, DA / BJB F1LE: 3624CH03
'-
LEGEND:
+ MONITORING WELL
---GROUNDWATER CONTOUR
353.73 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
AT WELL
NM NOT MEASURED
0
/
/,.__ -----,. / Q
I / _,
I
f
C-ZONE GROUNDWATER CONTOURS
SEPTEMBER 27, 2000
FIGURE:4
•
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Enclosure 3
Tables
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 1
Location
C-01A
C-018
C-02A
C-028
C-03A
C-038
C-04A
C-05A
C-06A
C-07A
C-08A
C-09A
C-098
C-09C
C-10A
C-108
C-118
C-12A
C-128
C-12C
C-13A
C-138
C-14A
C-148
C-15A
C-158
C-19C
C-20C
C-22C
C-25A
C-258
C-26A
C-268
C-27A
C-278
C-28A
C-288
Groundwater Elevations-
Third Quarter 2000
Top of
Casing Depth To
Gauging Elevation Groundwater
Date(s) (Feet amsl) (Feet)
09/27/2000 383.06 23.49
09/27/2000 383.35 97.40
09/27/2000 380.76 26.67
09/27/2000 381.72 12.38
09/27/2000 380.21 NA
09/27/2000 380.69 25.15
09/27/2000 385.31 17.40
09/27/2000 386.59 17.98
09/27/2000 383.90 14.00
09/27/2000 374.30 9.65
09/27/2000 376.34 31.92
09/27/2000 372.98 13.35
09/27/2000 374.76 20.78
09/27/2000 374.34 16.28
09/27/2000 373.88 19.58
09/27/2000 373.58 97.10
09/27/2000 363.28 10.59
09/27/2000 375.00 16.98
09/27/2000 375.75 15.77
09/27/2000 376.11 93.80
09/27/2000 367.31 8.21
09/27/2000 367.02 5.19
09/27/2000 371.13 28.31
09/27/2000 371.66 26.84
09/27/2000 357.08 3.46
09/27/2000 357.62 2.53
09/27/2000 365.84 12.82
09/27/2000 378.17 29.33
09/27/2000 355.24 5.24
09/27/2000 365.52 21.51
09/27/2000 364.85 23.46
09/27/2000 382.12 21.08
09/27/2000 382.21 39.00
09/27/2000 372.10 20.01
09/27/2000 372.01 34.39
09/27/2000 372.40 15.75
09/27/2000 373.07 7.53
Revised April 11, 2001
.ThermoRetec
Smart SolJJtions. Positive Outromes.
Groundwater
Elevation
(Feet amsl)
359.57
285.95
354.09
369.34
NA
355.54
367.91
368.61
369.90
364.65
344.42
359.63
353.98
358.06
354.30
276.48
352.69
358.02
359.98
282.31
359.10
361.83
342.82
344.82
353.62
355.09
353.02
348.84
350.00
344.01
341.39
361.04
343.21
352.09
337.62
356.65
365.54
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
i•
.ThermoRetec
Smart Solutions. Positive Outcomes.
Table 1 Groundwater Elevations-
Third Quarter 2000 (Continued)
Top of
Casing Depth To Groundwater
Gauging Elevation Groundwater Elevation
Location Date(s) (Feet amsl) (Feet) (Feet amsl)
C-29B 09/27/2000 369.00 34.65 334.35
C-30A 09/27/2000 379.11 25.38 353.73
C-31A 09/27/2000 379.98 20.87 359.11
C-32C 09/27/2000 368.88 25.87 343.01
C-33A 09/27/2000 354.37 9.50 344.87
C-33B 09/27/2000 352.84 7.45 345.39
C-33C 09/27/2000 353.54 18.40 335.14
C-34B 09/27/2000 376.31 15.92 360.39
C-34C 09/27/2000 376.39 17.17 359.22
M-04 09/27/2000 368.83 14.75 354.08
Notes:
amst = above mean sea level
------------
Table 2 Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results-Third Quarter 2000
Sample Location: Units C-108
Sample Date: 9/27/2000
Method 8290
1 ,2,3,4,6.7,8-HPCDD PGIL NA
1,2,3.4,6,7,8-HPCDF PGIL NA
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HPCDF PGIL NA
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCOD PGIL NA
1,2,3,4,7,8-HXCDF NA
1,2,3,6, 7,8-HXCDD PGIL NA
1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF PGIL NA
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCDD PGIL NA
1,2,3,7,8,9-HXCOF PGIL NA
1,2,3,7 ,8-PECDD PGIL NA
1 ,2,3,7,S•PECDF PGIL NA
2,3,4,6,7,8-HXCOF PGIL NA
2,3,4,7,8-PECOF PGIL NA
2,3,7,8-TCDO PGIL NA
2,3,7,8-TCDF PGIL NA
OCDD PGIL NA
OCDF PGIL NA
TOTAL HPCDO PGIL NA
TOTAL HPCDF PGIL NA
TOTALHXCDO PGIL NA
TOTAL HXCDF PGIL NA
TOTAL PECDD PGIL NA
TOTAL PECDF PGIL NA
TOTAL TCDD PG/L NA
TOTAL TCDF PG/L NA
Method 8270C SIM
2,4-0ICHLOROPHENOL UG/L I 0.20 U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL UG/L I 1.0 U
Notes:
NA indicates not analyzed.
U indicates compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
B indicates comp()und was a\so deiected in the blank.
J indicates an estimate value.
C-108 -DUP
9/27/2000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
I 0.20 U
1.0 U
C-14A C-14B C-298
9/27/2000 9/27/2000 9/27/2000
2530 NA 344
537 NA 55.1
36.1 NA 6.68 U
22.4 J NA 14.5 J
17.4 J NA 2.25 U
138 NA 15 J
25.9 J NA 2.39 U
70.2 NA 4.23 U
7.64 U NA 3.68 U
11.1 J NA 2.18 U
2.46 U NA 2.24 U
20.4 J NA 2.56 U
2.41 U NA 2.19 U
2.13 U NA 1.21 U
1.64 U NA 0.819 U
23200 8 NA 3650 B
1930 NA 249
3990 NA 606
1850 NA 245
481 NA 54.4
555 NA 62.4
11.1 NA 2.18 U
90.1 NA 6.23
2.13 U NA 1.21 U
1.64 U NA 0.819 U
0.53 U I 0.40 U I 4.0 U
21 I 15 I 80
Revised April 11, 2001
-------
.ThermoRetec
Smart Solutions. Positive Outcomes.
M-04 PW-01 Equipment Blank Field Blank
9/27/2000 9/27/2000 9/27/2000 9/27/2000
NA 13.9 U 15.6 U 42.5
NA 2.88 U 7.45 U 13.3 U
NA 4.39 U 11.8 U 17.9 U
NA 5.1 U 4.66 U 22.6 U
NA 2 U 2.59 U 3.91 U
NA 5.78 U 5.21 U 23.6 U
NA 2.34 U 2.45 U 4.15 U
NA 5.11 U 4.63 U 21.7 U
NA 3.31 U 3.99 U 6.36 U
NA 2.48 U 1.68 U 5.32 U
NA 1.72 U 1.54 U 3.85 U
NA 2.09 U 2.64 U 3.96 U
NA 1.9 U 1.42 U 3.41 U
NA 1.24 U 1.24 U 1.73 U
NA 1.67 U 1.39 U 1.9 U
NA 69.2 B 102 8 206 B
NA 7.7 U 9.38 U 71
NA 13.9 U 15.6 U 42.5
NA 3.54 U 9.38 U 75.8
NA 5.33 U 4.83 U 22.6 U
NA 2.4 U 2.86 U 13.3
NA 2.48 U 1.68 U 5.32 U
NA 1.81 U 1.48 U 3.63 U
NA 1.24 U 1.24 U 1.73 U
NA 1.67 U . 1.39 U 1.9 U
0.22 U 1.0 U 0.20 U I 0.20 U
1.1 U 30 1.0 U I 1.0 U
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Table 3 Calculation of Toxicity Equivalent Quotients for Dioxins/Furans
Analyte TEF
1 2 3 4 6 7 8-HPCDD 0.010
1.2 3.4 6.7 8-HPCDF 0.010
1.2 3.4 7.8.9-HPCDF 0010
1.2 3.4 7 8-HXCDD 0.100
1 2 3 4.7 8-HXCDF 0.100
1 2 3 6.7 8-HXCDD 0.100
1 2.3 6, 7 8-HXCDF 0.100
1 2.3 7.8 9-HXCDD 0.100
1 2.3.7 8.9-HXCDF 0.100
1 2 3 7 8-PECDD 0.500
1,2 3 7 8-PECDF 0.050
2.3 4.6 7,8-HXCDF 0.100
2.3 4.7 8-PECDF 0.500
2.3 7.8-TCDD 1.000
2.3 7,8-TCDF 0.100
OCDD 0.001
OCDF 0.001
TOTAL HPCDD 0.000
TOTAL HPCDF 0.000
TOTAL HXCDD 0.000
TOTAL HXCDF 0.000
TOTAL PECDD 0.000
TOTAL PECDF 0.000
TOTAL TCDD 0.000
TOTAL TCDF 0.000
Totals:
Notes:
TEF = Toxicity Equivalent Factor
TEO= Toxicity Equivalent Quotient
'
Units
nniL
nn/L
~L
nniL
nniL
nn/L
nniL -;;-,.,L
~L
nn/L
nniL
nniL
~L
nn/L
nniL
-;;;vL
nniL
nniL
..,,.,,--;-L
n-'L
nn L
nniL
-;;n'IL
-;;;:;,L
nniL
I
'
C-29B PW-1
Result TEO Result TEO
344.0 3.4 0.0 0.0
55.1 0.6 0.0 0.0
00 00 00 0.0
14.5 1.5 0.0 0.0
00 0.0 00 00
15.0 1.5 00 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 00
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 00 0.0
00 00 0.0 0.0
3650.0 3.7 69.2 0.1
249.0 0.2 00 0.0
606.0 00 0.0 0.0
245.0 00 0.0 0.0
54.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
62.4 0.0 00 0.0
0.0 00 0.0 0.0
6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 00
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5301.6 10.8 69.2 0.1
Laboratory results that were LI-qualified (not detected) were assigned a value of O for this calculation.
Revised Aprif 11, 2001
ThermoRetec
Smart Solution~ Positive Outcomes.
C-14A
Result TEO
2530.0 25.3
537.0 5.4
36.1 0.4
22.4 2.2
17.4 1.7
138.0 13.8
25.9 2.6
70.2 7.0
00 0.0
11 .1 5.6
0.0 00
20.4 2.0
0.0 00
00 00
0.0 0.0
23200 23.2
1930 1.9
3990 00
1850 0.0
481 0.0
555 0.0
11.1 00
0.0 0.0
00 0.0
0.0 0.0
35425.6 91.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ThermoRetec
Smart Solutions. Positive Outcomes.
Table 4 Constituents that Exceed Cleanup Standards
Well
C-14A
C-14B
C-29B
PW-01
C-14A
' '
Analyte
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Dioxins/Fu"rans
Units Cleanup Standard Result
uq/L 1 21
uq/L 1 15
ug/L 1 80
uq/L 1 30
pq/L 30 91.1
Revised April 11, 2001