NCD003200383_20001130_Koppers Co. Inc._FRBCERCLA SAP QAPP_On-Site Sampling 1990 - 2000-OCR

TRIP IJriFICA TION AND:A UTHORIZA nlr FOR/11
Program: D Federal
D State
~PL/DOD
Site Name:
ID Number:
Street Address:
City:
County:
Date(s) of Trip
) 2.,l1 -11. ( Z.l.
D Brownficlds
□ MPG D Dry Cleaners
f;{O'l.. lVu .... \..L
' Trip Canceled: 1 '
Trip Rescheduled (Date):
'
Reason For Trip: OvcR-~ ,,.,H ,-/ <::: Po-MP L: ...JL~
D Surface Soil
D Subsurface Soil
D Using Augers/Shovels to collect soil
D Using Little Beaver to collect soil
D Groundwater (from tap)
Authorized By:
(if samphng, c:heck appropriate boxes below)
: g"Groundwater (bailers) . I;:::::::;,,,,--'--;-io b"" J • .{._~ ___ ..,( t,__ l.1:1 Groundwater (pumps) S ) · , (-o , L--( ,__\ I ....rSo,,ll L-o Surface Water ._,;,., k ..Ji ;y,f -/.,, (., ,,__ D Sediment J..,f..,.,.: __ .._,(_
Assistant Assistant Assistant
/2..,.,__+or
Health Department-Official-Contacted: :Back Up Letter Required?: · · :Y:es •:' .
Notesk,c6wd ~we·· '.\ ~,· A ( -/(-~=:· -:i
DUslb(TRIP _NOT_A UTH.FRM) Revised: S/3/00
,
' • KEYSTONE
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
Phone: [phone] Tech Center Dr., l\:lonroeville, PA 15146
October 29, 1990
Ms. Barbara Benoy
NC/SC Site Management Unit
Superfund Branch, Waste Mgt. Div.
US EPA Region IV
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
Dear Barbara:
Re: Validation of Laboratory Data
Koppers Superfund RI/FS
I I
Fax: [phone]
Enclosed, please find one summary table (Table 1) presenting information
regarding the remaining analytical results (for samples collected from the Koppers
Morrisville site during the first round of, sampling), for which laboratory data
validation reports have been completed and received from A WD since October 4,
1990 (the date of the last data validation
1
update). This table includes an A WD
reference (job) number corresponding to each validation report; the Keystone work
order number(s) included in each validation report; the sample types and the
numbers of samples in each validation report; the validated analyses contained
within each report (indicated by an "X" in the appropriate column under
"ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS"); and a!"COMMENTS" column showing AWD
comments (if any) regarding laboratory performance and Keystone comments (if
any) regarding the validation reports. !
In addition to the attached summary table, please find enclosed, a copy of each data
validation report, received from A WO sine~ October 4, 1990.
Ms. Barbara Benoy I)
US EPA Region IV • October 29, 1990
Page 2
These remaining validation letters are being submitted for your review before the
October 31, 1990 deadline as you requested in your letter to Shannon Craig dated
September 26, 1990. Copies have also been sent to Mary Jane Rigatti at Dynamac,
Wade Knight at the ESD laboratory in iAthens and Pat DeRosa at the N.C.
Department of Human Resources (NCDHR).
I
Please note that you will be receiving a sehond copy of this information, later this
week via certified mail. I
If you require additional information, ple~se call me at [phone] or John
Mitsak at [phone]. Thank you for yo~r attention to this matter.
Best regards, ;J
j!;;z:;::;/ d .. if ~
Patrick B. Moroney-
Risk Analyst
PBM:rb pm-3
cc: Shannon Craig -Beazer
Wade Knight -ESD,Athens
Mary Jane Rigatti -Dynamac
Pat DeRosa -NCDHR
John Mitsak -Keystone
I
AWDREF.NO. KEYSfONE NO. SAMPLES bi.
WOltJC OllDER(S) AWDREPORT
(11..1 PROJECT NO.) (I) (2) , .. PIIEN
PGH-90-DAL-350 M90--06.l 42 I BENT: I CEM X
I STM: I SP
PGH-90-TMJ-363 (15690) 9SED
PGH-90-TMJ-381 (15932) 10 SOlL
PGH-90-Tt.U-382 (15882) 4SED ---------~--------------_. __ ----
PGH-90-DAL-374 M90--07.34 12GW X X
PGH-90-TMJ-380 (15747) 1 son.
(16100H) J son.
Soc Table Nctm QIQ Pap 3
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF VAUDAIBDAHALYTICAL RESULTS
FOR ROUND II SAMPLES
~D FROM AWD BETWEEN OCTOBER 5, 1990and OCTOBER 29, 1990
KOPPERS SITE, MOIUUSVILLE, N .C.
ANALYllCAL PARAMEIF.RS (I)
PEST/ DIS-voe svoc PCB DIOX MET CYAN BOD COD roe TSS MET SSOL
X
1
X
---X ----------·-----------
X
X
X
-PAOEI-
KEYSTONE COMMENTS ltEGAIU>INO VALIDAIBD DATA/
AU< SUI.I' a. AWD COMMENTS REGARDING LABORATOllY PERFORMANCE
AWD COMMENTS: B1an1r. oomaminatiOQ ,x,a,xmratiom were
sublractcd out by laboratory, a praaicc DOl coaa:ilU:Dl wilh
EPA Methodology.
A WD COMMENTS: Pootive -.mple ruu!t, for 1234678-HpCDD,
OCDD, 2378-TCDF, 123478-HxCDF, 234678-HxCDF,
1234678-HpCDF and OCDF oom~iablc to blanl c:ona::ntn.tions
-qualified •R •, unreliable. Cheda of recpome £ae1.on and
retma.iQQ ~ c:ouldu't be performed ADCC labon.tory didn't
Alpply nw data and c:hrCEllllogr-m.1 for individual c::alibratiooa:.
A WO COMMENTS: Quantitative interferc:ncc& identified in
aaal)'905 of l2.lti7'8-HxCDD, 123789-HxCDD. 234678-HxCDF,
123789-HxCDF, and K:YenJ. Total CDD/CDF analy-. Affected
ampk.l i:equircd dihaion and rcanal)'lis. POAtive re5Wti
from firlt nm, l.llldiluted an1.Jy11C11 ,.,.re qualified • J",
e.timatcd. Cb:dr... of rapome fae1.ors and n:i:cttion times
IXJI.Udn't be performed AD0C laboratory didn't wpply raw
data ud cbrorm.togr-m.1 for individual c::alibiatiOllll.
------A WD COMMENTS:·1237S.a.Pc,CDD, 123678=-Hxcoo;-
123789-HxCDD, 1234678-HpCDD, OCDD, 123478-HxCDF,
12.lti78-HxCDF, 1234678-HpCDF and OCDf detected in TI..I
blaziu. Positive ample rsult. ,.,.re qualified, "R', \111tCliablo.
OildJI of rc.pom,c factors and rc:tcmion times couldn't be
performed llD0C, laboratory did.n't Alpply raw dau ud
chromal.ogramt for individual c::alibrat.iom.
X X X A WO COMMENTS: Blank cont:aminatioo coooe:ntratiom wete
sublracud CU by laboratory, a praaicc DOl c:omiaea with
EPA Methodology.
AWD COMMENTS: Peak, for 123678-HxCDD, 1234678-HpCDD,
OCDD, 1234678-HpCDF, OCDF, and -.-er:al Total CDDICDF
anal)'--.rcatw-atcd for ai,:rp~ X-48-<:P. Pootive rewlll
for 11-compound• wen: qualifiod 'J', a:timatcd and rq,teaem
minimum val1am oaly. TI..I Ml b1:an1r. contained 1234678-HpC'DD,
OCDD. 1234678-HpCDF, OCDF a1 COD0C111.ratiom lua than .5'5 of
sampk rmuiu, whkb did rl<JI im.-ct -.mple qw.!ifi,;,1tioo..
~ of ra:pome faaors and retmt.ion timel: oowdn't be
performod IUQO laboiatory didn't supply raw da1.1 and
cbrorm.logram. for iDdividu:al calibration..
KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, lNC.
i
i i 1---~--
AWDREF.NO.
PGH-90-TMJ-392
PGH-90-TMl--401
PGH-90-TMJ-409
PGH-90-MKL--408
PGH-90-MKL.....07
~-~----
POH-90-MKL-343
KEYSTONE
WORK ORDEJl(S)
(IlJ PROJECT NO.)
M90-07.63
(l!ITI6R)
M90-07 . .53
M90-05.16
M90-05.40
-------~---
M90-05.4
M9o--04.87
M90--05.I05
NO. SAMPI.ES DI.
AWDREPORT
(I) (2) IP£ PHEN voe
IOGW X X
2SED
2GW X X
16 sou. X
l4SEO X
-----------
22 SOIL X X
I STM: I MUN X X
8SOIL X
TABLE I
SUMMAltYOFVALIDAttDANALYTICALRESULTS
FOR ROUND II SAMPI.ES
RECEIVED FROM AWDBETWEEN OCTOBERJ, 1990andOCTOBER 29, 1990
KOPPERS SITE, MOR.iUSVILLE. N.C.
ANALYTICAL PARAME"l'ER.S (I}
PESTI DIS--svoc PCB DIOX MET CYAN BOD COD TOC TSS MET SSOL
X
X
X
X
~ ~---X ---------~ -----------
X
X
-PAGE2-
KEYSTONE COMMENTS llEGAR.DlNG VAUDATED DATA/
AU{ SULF a. AWD COMMENTS REGARDING LABORATORY PERFORMANCE
X X X AWD COMMENTS: No qialiiy co:m.rol or raw data for mttal• were
included in the data package, prew:QUDg eYll.h.-tion of
mctal1 ruul.lll,
A WD COMMENTS: RCR.1111 for HpCDD and OCDD ~b of
-.mplc S-168-EA •re n:ported for dillaed ample due to pau.
atwatioa in initial nm. Chcclui cl respom,e (actora and
rcu:alion time,; couldn't be performed 5iDCC laboratory
dida'l supply raw data and chromatognms for indi.vid!Al
calibntiona:.
X X X AWD COMMENTS: Uability of phenol data~ q-.ionncd by
reviewer due to id.crfcrcnca Lii ai::alylU cl (tdd bl.anl.
No qw.lity oon1rol or nw data for mctab 11/Cre included UI
the data ~cbgc prevmting -iwtioa of mcu\s ?C5Wt,.
A WO COMMENTS: Bia.nk eoru..minatioa c:ooccnlnliowi lll'Cre
iUblraetcd OU by laboralory, a practice not C<.laSUtcd with
EPA Methodology.
-----~ AWD COMMENTS:· &a.nlr. eomamim.ticm CODOCnlration& were
subtracted out by laboratory.• p~ not~ 1lrli.th
EPA Mcthodo1ogy.
A WD COMMENTS: Blank comaminati0:11. conccnr.n.ti.OD11 were
lllbtractcd 0..-by laboratoty, • pt9WOC DOI comidca MLb
EPA Methodology.
'
KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
i
I
' .,
i
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF VALIDATED ANALYnCAL RESt.n.TS
FOR ROUND II SAMPLES
ltECEIVEO FROM AWD BErWEEN OCTOBER !Ii, 1990 aid OCI'OflER. 29, 1990
KOPPERS SITE. MORR.I~ N.C.
AWDREF.NO. KEYSTONE NO. SAMPIES ba ANAL YllCAL PARAMIITERS (I)
WORK OltDER{S) AWDREPOltT PEST/ DIS-(11.J PROJECT NO.) {I) (l) IP!! PIIEN voe svoc PCB DIOX MET CYAN BOD COD roe TSS MET SSOL PGH-90-TMJ-423 {l!li900) II SEDIMENT X
PGH-90-MKl..-416 M9o-o6.139 1300M X X
M90--07.7 ITW X X
!(iH790:-TMJ:-399_ M90:-06.04 __ ~ __4 GW: 6 SED;. -------X--x--x--~---------. . --
M90--06.22 6SOIL
TABLE NOTES:
(I) ThD following abbrmaliOD key may be uKd in clu,;:,cmiD.g amlyti,::al paramcten and l&mplc, types:
Am.12:!!!:'!! Parametera
IPE bopropyl~ TOC Total Orpnic Carbon
PHEN ......... TSS T ota1 Suapc:o;Scd Salida voe Volatile Orpnic Coanpounds DIOX Dioxins!Furam
SVOC Se.ni-Vowile Orpnic Compo.md. DIS-MET Diaolvcd Mculs -lnc'luda Sodium. Potaa:iurn. Ma&Df=liurn. Caki= PEST/PCB Pcaicidc:/Polychlorimt.cd Bipheayl .. OL ...........
MET """' ALK Allalimty-bdudaTotal, C..rt-».teand ~rbo!aleAlkaliDity
CYAN ey.olde Sl/LF S~t;lc
BOD Bioclxmical Oxygen Dc:nand a. Chloride coo OlCmica1 Oxygca Dc:nand
(2) ThD fol.lowing i1 an eu.rnpk for intcq,rci:ing !ht ool.umn ~ the •mple type■ and n=bcr of arnpl~ coatainod within each A WD Vtiidation report.
Note: "Number ol a..mpb" includa -.mpla. field d~, and EPA split ampla: Numbcl-doc■ not include trip blank■• field b1anu or rimate blanl■•
EXAMPLE: 10 SW -1c:a swfaa; -tu •mplca 8 SED .. eight IICdimcu a..mplc:,i;
Sc. Tab&D NOlol OD Pago 3 -PAG£3-
KEYSTONE <DMMENTS I.EGAR.DING VALIDATED DATA/
AU( SULF a. AWD COMMENTS REGARDING LJ.BOR.ATOILY PElt.FOllMANCE
AWD COMMENTS: Quamitativc illlcrfcn:nce affocud amlylU
of Total PcCDD and Total lhCDF iD two -.mpb whidi arc:
qualified "J", C1'U.IDl.1cd. RCN11 for 123789-fbCDD and
234678-Hx.CDF ""'=' qualified "J", CAimatcd, dllO to poorly
,-,lvcd chromatographic p,:ab. RCNt, for 1234678-HpCDD,
1234678-HpCDF and 11CVCrai Total CDDICDF •re qtalificd "J".
caimatcd, due 10 ~ of quality com.rol criteria iD
~rilJOll of field duplic:aie.. OCDD result, for S-llA-FP
are qualified "J", mtimal.cd, due lo intc:rml .. ndard
recovery aoecding qual.ily control criteria. O.bu OCDD
result, arc: reported for diluted a.mplc:s due lo •tun.lion.
Cmclr.1 of~ racton and rclClll..ion time,,; oouldn'1 be
performed RDCIC !ht laboratory did not provide: raw data and
cb.ror!:.tognum for individual aili.bratiOIU.
N-.
-AWD COMMENTS: POAtiv.:, resulu: for .:vc:ra.1 voe., SVOCs,
and ~ in -amplm -reported at
conca11:rations below Coalract Required Detection Umiu, and
v,,,c.ni qualified ·1·.
Sample T:re
GW (noomd~ • SW Surfaocwa1c:;r
SOIL Soil
SEO ,.._
OFW Organicfroc~
MUN Munidpalwa1c:;r
STM "'"m"°"'
SP Swpo<k
CEM ea..,,
BENT Ba!lonite powdct/pdk:ts
KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
TABLE R-1
COMPARISON OF ROUND 1 AND ROUND 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY; INC. SITE
BEAZER EAST, INC.,MORRISVILLE,N.C.
LOCATION C-1B-OSN
DATE SAMPLED 07/10/90
UNITS ug/L
ROUND ROUND 1
PARAMETERS
PENTACHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 515 0.216
PENTACHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 8040 4U
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 8040 4U
2,3,5,6-TETRACHlOROPHENOl: BY METHOD 8040··--16.4 -
NOTES:
U -Below Detection Limit
J-Analyte Present. Reported value may be inaccurate or imprecise.
UJ -Below Detection Limit. Detection limit is estimated.
C-1B-OSN C-1B-OSN
10/03/90 10/11/90
ug/L ug/L
ROUND 2 ROUND 2
0.228 NA
NA 7.77 J
NA 111 UJ
NA -16:9 J" .
NA -Not Analyzed. Well did not yield sufficient sample volume for analyses ..
C-3B-OSW C-3B-OSW C-7A-EA
06/06/90 10/18/90 06/06/90
ug/L ug/L ug/L
ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 1
0.035 0.01 U 0.013
1.53 1.1 1 U
1 U 1 U 1 U
1 (J 1 U 1 U
C-7A-EA
10/11/90
ug/L
ROUND 2
0.01 U
1.34
1 U
1.58
•
TABLE R-1 (Continued)
COMPARISON OF ROUND 1 AND ROUND 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY, INC. SITE
BEAZER EAST, INC.,MORRISVILLE,N.C.
LOCATION C-11A-OSE
DATE SAMPLED 07/11/90
UNITS ug/L
ROUND ROUND1
PARAMETERS
PENTACHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 515 0.014 U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 8040 3.67
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 8040 1 U
·2,3;5,6=TETRACHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 8040 1 U
NOTES:
U -Below Detection Limit
J-Analyte Present. Reported value may be Inaccurate or imprecise.
UJ -Below Detee1ion Limit. Detection limit Is estimated.
C-11A-OSE
10/12/90
ug/L
ROUND 2
0.01 U
1 U
1 U ---
1 U
NA -Not Analyzed. Well did not yield sufficient sample volume for analyses.
C-15B-OSS C-15B-OSS C-16C-OSE
06/04/90 10/10/90 07/17/90
ug/L ug/L ug/L
ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 1
0.125 0.01 U 0.01 U
1.6 1 U 1 UJ
.1 U .. .1.8 U--------33.1-J~---
1 U 1 U 15.7 U
C-16C-OSE • 10/11/90
ug/L
ROUND 2
0.01 U
1 U
1.11 u~ --~
1 U
•
----------
TABLE R-1 (Continued)
COMPARISON OF ROUND 1 AND ROUND 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY, INC. SITE
BEAZER EAST, INC.,MORRISVILLE,N.C.
LOCATION C-18C-OSN
DATE SAMPLED 07/16/90
UNITS ug/L
ROUND ROUND 1
PARAMETERS
PENTACHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 515 0.016
PENTACHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 8040 1 U
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 8040 3.55
2,3;5,6=TETRACHtOROPHENOl BY METHOD 8040 1.8 U
NOTES:
U -Below Detection Limit
J-Analyte Present. Reported value may be inaccurate or imprecise.
UJ -Below Detection Limit. Detection limit is estimated.
NA -Not Analyzed. Well did not yield sufficient sample volume for analyses.
C-18C-OSN
10/16/90
ug/L
ROUND 2
0.01 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
C-20C-OSW C-20C-OSW C-21C-OSE
07/17/90 10/10/90 07/17/90
ug/L ug/L ug/L
ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 1
0.01 U 0.01 U 0.02
48.7 J 5.26 1 U
1 UJ 1 U 9.86-----
1 UJ 1 U 2.36 U
C-21C-OSE
10/12/90
ug/L
ROUND 2
0.014
1.8
1-U ------
1 U
•
TABLE R-1 (Continued)
COMPARISON OF ROUND 1 AND ROUND 2 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY, INC. SITE
BEAZER EAST, INC.,MORRISVILLE,N.C.
LOCATION C~22C-OSW --" ---
DATE SAMPLED 07/17/90
UNITS ug/L
ROUND ROUND 1
PARAMETERS
PENTACHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 515 0.01 U
PENTACHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 8040 1 UJ
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL BY METHOD 8040 3.83 J
-2,3,5,6-TETRACHl0R0PHEN0L:-BY METHOD 8040-----1:2u--~
NOTES:
U -Below Detection Limit
J-Analyte Present. Reported value may be inaccurate or imprecise.
UJ -Below Detection Limit. Detection limit is estimated.
C-22C-OSW
10/12/90
ug/L
ROUND 2
0.011
1.01
5.69 U -ru-
NA -Not Analyzed. Well did not yield sufficient sample volume for analyses.
C-25B-WA C-25B-WA--
06/14/90 10/23/90
ug/L ug/L
ROUND 1 ROUND 2
0.177 0.031 U
155 18.6 U
1 U 13
1 U ---3.39
•
•
•
Dear Barbara:
July
i • Beazer East, Inc.
°Environmental Se es
436 Seventh Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1990
I Ms. Barbara Benoy
-KtCtJVIED
JUL 2 :l 1990
SU\>ERfUND SEC1ION
VIA FAX and
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT
REQUESTED
US Environmental Protection Agency
Region IV
345 Courtland street, NE
Atlaritai GA 30365
I
Re: Koppers Site
Morrisville, NC I
I
I
Enclosed please find Keystone's retter to you outlining their
recommendations for second round :surface water sampling and
analyses. Upon review of the data, it seems that we may need to
discuss the possibility of additional sampling locations north of
SW 25, south of SW 24 & east of SW 28, We feel TCL, TAL,
phenolics and IPE, will not be necessary but pentachlorophenol
and phenolics ma:r. be justified for further study in these
locations. Second round sampling! is tentatively scheduled for
the week of ,Tuly '30. We have rescheduled the sampling in order ' ' to allow time for. concurrence on second round parameters. If
this is a problem, for you or your:contractors, please let me
know. i , I
I am in the office today as well ~s the remaining portion of the
week. So, feel free to call at your convenience.
/lpd
I
Sincerely,
,!JI_~ 1<. t '
Shannon K·. Craig a
Program Manager-Environmental Services
I
.,
I
I
• l
STONE
[:,,;\'IRO:,,iMt::-.'! AL R[SOllRCf.S, l!"riC.
Phone: [phone] Tech Center Dr.,i Monroeville. PA 15146
July 13, 1990
Ms. Barbara Benoy ·.
NC/SC Site Management Unit
Superfund Branch, Waste Mgt. Div.
US EPA Region IV ·
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA. 30365 :
Dear Barbara:
Re: Evaluation of Surface Water Round ·~ Results
Koppers Superfund RI/FS ·
Fax: [phone]
Ref. No. 179280-06
The analytical data for the surface water sariiples collected during May of 1990 from the Koppers Morrisville site were evaluated Ito provide guidance for selection of the second sampling round analytical parameter;s. Keystone submitted a summary table to you for all first round surface water sample analyses performed between May 1 and 7, 1990 in a transmittal dated July 12,' 1990 (Round 1 summary). Analytical parameters included: semi-volatile orga~ic compounds (EPA method 8270); volatile organic compounds (8240); pesticides and PCBs (SOSO); phenolic compounds (8040); ·pentachlorophenol (515); isopropyl ether (8020); metals (aluminum, antimony, arsenic, barium, betyllium, cadmium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, . lead, magnesium, manganese, mercury, nickel, potassium, selenium, silver,. sodiu·m, thallium, vanadium, and zinc); cyanide; and water quality parameters (alkalinity;. chloride and sulfate).:
After reviewing the detected constituents bresented in the Round 1 summary, Keystone determined the parameters of interest recommended for the second round of surface water sampling are: phenolic I compounds, pentachlorophenol, and isopropyl ether. Round 1 data suggest pes'ticides, PCBs and cyanide are not of concern. Concentrations of volatile and semi-volatile organic constituents and metals also were detected in some surface water samples, however, these will not be considered for the second round of sampling as will be explained below.
I Only one semivolatile organic compound (bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate) and two volatile organic compounds (methylene chloride and acetone) were detected in the surface water samples: collected during thel first sampling round. Since these compounds are commonly known laboratory a'rtifacts, and since their concentrations in the samples did not exceed ten times their respective maximum blank concentrations (from tlie blank data available), it is likely that the data validation currently being performed will discount these': constituents as being constituents of concern for the second round of surface water sampling.
'
'
Ms. Barbara Bel
US EPA Region IV • July 18, 1990
Page 2
The results of the analyses for pesticides,\PCBs and cyanide show that none of these constituents we~e detected in any of thel surface samples collecte~ _during the first round of sampling. Therefore, Keyston,e recommends that pest1c1des, PCBs and cyanide not be considered as parameters for the second round of surface water 1. I samp mg. ,
'
In addition to our', previously submitted ~ummary, and in order to aid you in your review of the data, please find a separate analytical summary table presenting the results of the metals and cyanide analyses performed on the first round of surface water samples. All metals were detected in the surface water samples with the exceptions being antimony, mercury, nickel, silver, and thallium. Of all of the metals which were detected, only aluminum, beryllium, iron, and manganese concentrations were found to exceed their respective MCLs (proposed or tentative MCLs) or SMCLs.; It is likely that the concentration levels detected for aluminum, iron and manganese are due to the natural abundance of these metals in soils and sediments. Beryllium, on the other hand, iwhich is not as abundant was detected in only one sample at: a low concentration (1.3 ug/L) which is just slightly above the tentative MCL of 1.p ug/L for beryllium. 1
I Moreover, the surface water samples in which these metals were detected were not filtered prior to laboratory sample preparation. It is likely that sediments were present 10 the samples and contributed to the elevated concentrations of metals detected in the aqueous digestants of the samples. Therefore, for the above reasons and since these metals are not considered, to be site-related constituents, Keystone recommends that TAL analysis (metals) not be considered as parameters of interest for the second round of surface water sampling.
' ' I
Regarding the Round 1 summary of dioxin/furan analyses for locations SW-10-FP and SW-12-FP, results indicate that little difference, if any, exists between the filtered and unfiltered samples. It should 1be noted that the result for the OCDD analysis on sample SW-10-FP (unfiltered) is flagged with an "S" laboratory qualifier indicating that the normal dynamic range of the mass spectrometer detecuon system was exceeded. The ,reported OCDD conc'entration for that sample (122 ng/L S) represents a "minimum estimate" irrespective of whether the ion-abundance ratio or the retention time identification criteria we~e met. A recheck of this sample would be required, but the holding time was exceeded necessitating a resampling of this location to meet the quality assurance objectives for the analysis. , I
' If you require additional information, please call me at [phone]. , . I
/
~ruly yours,,, ~f ,(,-' (} I ~;j~ ( .. , l✓fv-J.._ /I{!:;;, ..
John C. Mitsak, P.E.
Manager, Baltimore Qperations
JCM:rb jml
cc: S. Craig
P. DeRosa
P. Moroney
I
i
I
J. Zubrow
Central File I
PREI.IMINAKY DATA --UNVALm.-.TED ••• DO NOT CITT OR QUOTE •• • 13-Jul-90
PllEUMINAltY SURFACE WATER DATASUMMAR.Y-May 1-7, 1990
BF.AZER. EAST, INC.
KOPPEILS SITE -MOIUUSVIl.LE, NC
ANAL mc.u. PARAMl:.TERS UNITS SW-IFP SW-IFP SW-IFP SW-lFP SW-IOFP SW-IOFP SW-l'lFP SW-lll'P SW-12J.'P SW-I 6A--EA
SlfR},'ACE SURF DUP 213 OF.PTII 213 DUP SURFACE 213DEYI11 SURFACE "ll~ DEP'lll 2/J DUP
MhTAI.S .t. CYANIDE
ALUMINUM UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 811.1 • U.l • NA • ANTIMONY UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 22 UN 22 UN NA
ARSENIC UG/L NA NA NA NA NA NA_ NA UWN -2.) -eN NA
BA_RIUM UGIL NA NA-NA NA NA NA NA 10.1 • 10.6 • NA
BERYLLIUM UO,L NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 u 1 u NA
CADMIUM UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1., • 2., • NA
CALCIUM UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA (1990 70W NA
CHROMIUM UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA u ' u NA
COBALT UGtL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ' u u NA
COPPER UG/L NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ,. 7 • 1.6 • NA
IRON UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA .,, "° NA
LEAD UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.1 • 2.7 • NA
MAGNESIUM UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2290 • mo • NA
MANGANESE UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10.1 86.) NA
MERCURY UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.2 UN 0.2 UN NA
NICKEL UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 12 u 12 u NA
POTASSIUM UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ,. .. • "'° B NA
SELENIUM UGIL NA NA NA _NA -NA--NA~--NA----~1 -u-1 B --~ iiA
______ SILVER-------·---uo11.-NA ___ NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 u 2 u NA
SODIUM UG/L NA NA NA NA NA NA NA J ljOO I ljOO NA
THALLIUM UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2 uw 2 uw NA
VANADIUM UGIL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA • 2.7 • NA
ZINC UG/L NA NA NA NA NA NA NA )0.1 ,0,2 NA
CYANIDE UO,L NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 10 u 10 u NA •
PAGE I SEE TABLE NOTES ON PAGE 21 FOR EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS AND D,\TA QUALIFIERS BY ANALYSIS TIPE flLE:SWl.WKI
PRF.LIMINARY DATA --UNVALIDATED ••• 00 NOT CITE OR QUOTE uo IJ-Jul-90
PRELIMINARY SURFA~ WA.TB. DATA SUMMAJlY-Ma,-1-7.1990
BEAZ.ER EAST, INC.
KOPPERS SITE-MORRISVIU.E. NC
ANALYTICAi. PAllAMh-rERS UNIT> SW-16B-EA SW-16B-EA SW-llEA SW-18-MP SW-IIIMP SW-IIIMP SW-IIMP SW-lOMP SW-2:0MP SW-22MP SW-12MI'
DUPLICATE "'OOl'TH 2/l DEPTII SUlU'A<li SURF DUP SURFA<li 2/)DEYfH SURFA<li "'llEYfH
RECHEO<
MJITAI .SA CYANIDE
ALUMINUM UGIL NA NA NA '72 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA • ANTIMONY UGIL NA NA NA 22 u NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ARSENIC UG/L NA NA NA 1.7 BW NA NA NA NA· NA NA NA ~!{J!J!-4 UG/L NA -NA-NA 25.8 • NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BERYLLIUM UGIL NA NA NA 1.0 u NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CADMIUM UGIL NA NA NA 2.8 • NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
CALCIUM UG/L NA NA NA 7260 E NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CHROMIUM UGIL NA NA NA u NA NA NA NA NA NA NA C08ALT UG!L NA NA NA u NA NA NA NA NA NA NA COPPER UGIL NA NA NA 1.1 • NA NA NA NA NA NA NA IRON UOIL NA NA NA 2100 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA LEAD UGIL NA NA NA w NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MAGNESIUM UG/L NA NA NA 2380 • NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MANGANESE UGIL NA NA NA "' NA NA NA NA NA NA NA MERCURY UGIL NA NA NA 0.2 u NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NICKEL UGIL NA NA NA 12 u NA NA NA NA NA NA NA POTASSIUM UGIL NA NA NA 3610 • NA NA NA NA _ N~" . NA __ NA ___
SELENIUM UG/L NA _J<A ----NA ___ ---1-U----NA--NA-----NA NA~-NA NA NA SILVER--uGIL-NA-NA NA u NA NA NA NA NA NA NA SODIUM UGIL NA NA NA 10<00 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
THALLIUM UGIL NA NA NA 2 u NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
VANADIUM UGIL NA NA NA 2., • NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
ZINC UGIL NA NA NA 3-'.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA CYANIDE UGIL NA NA NA 10 u NA NA NA NA NA NA NA •
PAOE2 SEE TABLE NO'IBS ON PAGE 21 FOR EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DATA QUALIFIERS BY ANALYSIS TYPE fll.E:SW3.WKI
PRELIMINARY UATA --UNVALIDATI::0 ••• 00 NOT CrTI:: OR QUOTE ••• ll-JuJ-90
Pll.ELIMINARY SURFACE WA'JU DATA SUMMARY-May 1-7, 1990
BEA.7.F.R F.!Sf, INC.
KOPPERS SITE -MOIUUSVIUE, NC
ANAL Y11CA.L. PAltAMl!ll:RS UNITS SW-2JEA SW-><EA SW-W.A SW-2.5EA SW-26EA SW-21EA SW-"NWA SW-'J(NIA SW-llWA SW-JZWA SW-lJWA
DUPLICATE
M1.TAI.S .i: CTANll)E
ALUMINUM UG/L NA 1130 "'° NA 682 NA NA NA NA NA NA •-ANTIMONY UG/L NA 22 UN 22 UN NA 22 UN NA NA NA NA NA NA ARSENIC UGIL NA ,_, BN 1.2 BWN NA .1.5 .BWN -NA NA NA NA NA NA
BARIUM -UG!L NA ,, -• 37.3 • NA 26.1 • NA NA NA NA NA NA
BF.RYU.IUM UGIL NA I u I u NA I u NA NA NA NA NA NA
CADMIUM UG/L NA I u 1-1 • NA ,_, • NA NA NA NA NA NA
CALCIUM UG/L NA mo mo NA 8360 NA NA NA NA NA NA
CHROMIUM UGIL NA 3 u 3 u NA 3 u NA NA NA NA NA NA COBALT UGIL NA u u NA u NA NA NA NA NA NA
COPPER UGIL NA 10.0 • 10.1 • NA • • NA NA NA NA NA NA
IRON UGIL NA 2830 349-0 NA 1180 NA NA NA NA NA NA
LEAD UGI[. NA ,.2 ,.1 NA ,., NA NA NA NA NA NA MAGSE.SIUM UGIL NA 2120 • 2740 • NA 3080 • NA NA NA NA NA NA MANGANESE UGI[. NA 1 ... 119 NA 1'8 NA NA NA NA NA NA
MERCURY UGIL NA 0.2 UN 0.2 UN NA 0.2 UN NA NA NA NA NA NA
NICKEL UGIL NA 12 u 12 u NA 12 u NA NA NA NA NA NA
POTASSIUM UG!L NA 3180 • 2980 • NA 1620 • NA NA NA NA __ NA NA __ ~---SELENIUM UGIL •----NA----1-u "NA-NA-NA----NA NA NA NA _1.I_B -----1 --------Sil.VER _____ ~UGIL--NA 2 u 2 u NA u NA NA NA NA NA NA
SODIUM UG!L NA 10700 10600 NA .. ,. • NA NA NA NA NA NA
THALLIUM UGIL NA 2 u 2 u NA 2 u NA NA NA NA NA NA
VANADIUM UGIL NA ,. 7 • '·' • NA 2 • NA NA NA NA NA NA
ZINC UGIL NA 34.9 "°·' NA 67.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA
CYANIDE UG!L NA 10 u 10 u NA 10 u NA NA NA NA NA NA •
PAGE 3 SEE TABLE NOffiS ON PAGE 21 FOR EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DATA QUALIFIERS BY ANALYSIS TYPE Fll.E:SWJ.WKI
PRELIMINARY DATA --UNVALIDATED ••• DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE ••• 13-Jul-W
PR.a..lMINAJlY SURFACE WA'JER DATA SUMMARY -May 1-7, 1990
Bf'.A7.Ell EAST. INC.
KOPPERS SITE -MOtUUSVD.JE., NC
ANALYTICAL PARAMEIElS UNITS SW-:MWA SW---RlNSATH SW---RINSATH SW-R.INSATF. SW---RINSATF. SW...._INSATF.
'" '" '" '" "' RECHEa<
METALS .I. CYANIOP.
ALUMINUM UG/L 16200 II u II u NA 11 u NA • ANTIMONY UGIL 22 UN 22 UN 22 UN NA 22 u NA
AR:SEJ,j'IC_ UGIL UWN -I-UN UN NA u NA
BARIUM UGIL 113 8 u u NA u NA
BERYU.IUM UGIL 1.3 8 I u u NA u NA
CADMIUM UGIL 2.2 8 I.> 8 u 8 NA I u NA
CALCIUM UGIL •310 8 "·' 8 16.2 8 NA I.S.3 .. NA
CHROMIUM U(;IL 16 • .S 3 u 3 u NA u NA
COBALT UGIL 3.2 8 u u NA u NA COPPER UGIL 18.9 8 I u I.I u NA I u NA IRON UGIL 20100 6., 8 t• . .s 8 NA ,., 8 NA
LEAD UG/L 14.1 u I u NA 1.3 8 NA
MAGNESIUM UGtL 2"0 • 20 u 20 u NA 20 u NA
MANGANf"..SE UGIL 226 I u u NA u NA
MERCURY UGIL 0.2 UN 0.2 UN 0.2 UN NA 0.2 u NA
NICKEi. UGIL 12 u 12 u 12 u NA 12 u NA
POTASSIUM UO,L 1580 • '66 u 366 u NA 366 u NA -~---------------------SELENIUM----UGIL---U-BW ---1:r .. --_--·-r· u NA----1· u ----N-A
SILVER UGIL 2 u u u NA 2 u NA
SODIUM UG/L 9210 9.S.8 8 72.3 8 NA 122 8 NA
THALLIUM UGIL 2 u 2 uw 2 u NA u NA
VANADIUM UGtL 43.4 8 I u 1.7 8 NA u NA
ZINC UGIL 111.8 6.2 8 6.6 8 NA u NA
CYANIDE UGIL IO u IO u IO u NA IO u NA •
PAGE• SEE TABLE NO"JeS ON PAGE 21 FOR EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DATA QUALIFlERS BY ANALYSIS1YPE Fll..E:SWJ.WKI
METALS
CYANIDE
ANALYSIS TYPE
TABLE ABBREVIATIONS
PAOE5
TABLE NOTES FOR
PRELIMINARY SURFACE WATER DATA SUMMARY
QUALIFIER
CODE
u
B
M
E
N
s
____ w
NA
DESCRIPTION
Not detected at or above the lnatrument Detection Limit (IDL).
Reponed value wat leu than the ContRCl Required Detection Limit (CRDL) but greater
than or equal to the Instrument Detection Limit (IDL).
Duplicate injection precision no< met.
Reponed value i■ estimated becau.c of the pre■cncc of interference. Normally
auociatcd with the aerial dilution result.
Spiked sample recovery nol within control limit1.
Reponed value Wat dctennined by the Method of Standard Addition (MSA).
Post-:-digeatioo spike for.furnace AA-analy1i1 i1 out·of control·limit1·(85-l l5%);---
while sample abaorbance is Jen than SO~ of spike abaorbance.
Duplicate analy1i1 n()( within control limit•.
Com:latioo cocfficicnl for the MSA i, !cu than 0.995.
Not Analyzed
FILE:TNJ.WKI
•
•
I
. ~ : • UNITED ~ATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ENVIRONMENTALiSERVICES DIVISION
ATHENS, GEORGIA 30613
I ·Ni:CtJ\/EU
JUL :i 1990
MEMORANDUM SUPERFUND SECTION
DATE:
SUBJECT:
FROM:
TO:
June 28·, 1990
I
Koppers Company, Morrisyille, NC
Wade Knight, Chief iJ,,d,__ /L.f
Laboratory Evaluation and
Quality Assurance Section
I
Barbara Benoy, RPM 1
North Superfund RemediaI Branch
Waste Management Divisio'n
I
i
I We received and have reviewed datai packages for seven water
samples taken at the subject site in November 1989. These
samples were analyzed for dioxins and furans by the PRP's labora-
tory, Triangle Laboratories. Fiveiof these samples were split
with EPA and were analyzed by a CLP laboratory.
Based on our review of the data
acceptable. For the five split
reported by either laboratory.
I
packages, the data appear to
samples, no positive results
I
I
I A copy of the ESD data is
Attachments
attached.'
I
. '
I
I
be
were
•
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTA~ PROTECTION AGENCY
I
REGION IV
COLLEGE STATION RD.
ATHENS, GA. '30613
I
I
I
*****MEMORANDUM******
DATE: 01/23/90
SUBJECT: R
9
e
0
s_u
20
1
5
ts of Spe_c;jfi,,f_rj __ ~!l.P-..tys is;
,KOPP..ERS'i.CONNCt../ .MORRISVILL {NC i
SAS NO: 51100
FROM: Robert W. Knight ,
Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Quality Assu ranee Sect ion
TO: WADE KNIGHT
I
I Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
the subject project. 1
I If you have any questions please contact me;
ATTACHMENT
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
*• ****"'* * **** .. * •••••• ******** "'*** * * * • * * • * * * * * * * * * .. * * * * * :r: * * * .. .. .. ..
PROJECT NO. 90-205 SAMPLE NO. 41961 SAMPLE TYPE: WATER SOURCE: KOPPERS CO. INC. STATION ID: 14KDD19702 CASE.NO.: 0 SAS NO.: 5110D
"
•
•••FOOTNOTES•••
RE SUL TS UN ITS .025U NG/L . 02SUJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L .25U NG/L .025U NG/L . 025UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L .25U NG/L NG/L
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: M MCDONALD CITY: MORRISVILL ST: NC COLLECTION START: 11/29/89 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: 02-1 MD NO:
PARAMETER 2.3. 7,8 TCDD(DIOXIN) TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) HEXACHLOROD!BENZODIOX!N (TOTAL) HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) OCTACHLOROD!BENZODIOXIN 2,3, 7,8 TCDF (DIBENZOFURAN) TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) HEPTACHLORODIBEZOFURAN (TOTAL) OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN TEQ(TOX!CITY EQUIVALENT VALUE)
01/22/90
* * * *** " ** ** ..
**
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF fJATER!AL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER-THAN -VALUE GIVEN •U-MATER!AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
**""*"**""****•***•"*"****"'****** • • * * * ... * * * * • * * * * * • • • • • • * * • * ** ** ** ** **
PROJECT NO. 90-205 SAMPLE NO. 41962 SAMPLE TYPE: WATER SOURCE: KOPPERS CO. INC. STATION JD: 0580019703 CASE.NO.: 0 SASN0.:51100
•
*"*FOOTNOTES•••
RESULTS UNITS .02SU NG/L .025UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L .2SU NG/L .02SU NG/L .025UJ NG/L . 1 2UJ NG/L . 1 2UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 2SU NG/L NG/L
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: M MCDONALD CITY: MORRJSVILL ST: NC COLLECTION START: 11/29/89 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: 03-1 MD NO:
PARAMETER 2.3, 7.8 TCDD(DIOXINJ TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) PENTACHLORODIBENZOD!OX!N (TOTAL) HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) HEPTACHLORODJBENZODIOXJN (TOTAL) OCTACHLORODIBENZOD!OXIN 2,3.7.8 TCDF (DIBENZOFURAN) TETRACHLORODJBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) PENTACHLORODJBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) HEPTACHLORODIBEZOFURAN (TOTAL) OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN TEQ(TOXICITY EQUIVALENT VALUE)
01/22/90
• • • ... .. ..
** •• ..
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANT!TATJON LIMIT.
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/22/90
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT ...
•• .. .. •• ..
•
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••• ' ••• * ~ ••••• * * •••••••••••••••• PROJECT NO. 90-205 SAMPLE NO. 41963 SAMPLE TYPE: WATER SOURCE: KOPPERS CO.INC . STATION ID: SHDD19704 CASE.NO.: 0 SAS NO.: 5110D
RESULTS UNITS .025U NG/L .025UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L .25U NG/L .025U NG/L .025UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L .25U NG/L NG/L
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: M MCDONALD •• CITY: MORRISVILL ST: NC " COLLECTION START: 11/29/89 STOP: 00/00/00 •• D. NO.: 04-1 MD ND: "
PARAMETER 2.3. 7,8 TCDD(DIDX!Nl TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN 2,3, 7,8 TCDF (DIBENZOFURAN) TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) HEPTACHLORODIBEZOFURAN (TOTAL) OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN TEQ(TOXICITY EQUIVALENT VALUE)
•••FOOTNOTES*** •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT ... •• .. ..
•• ..
•
•
••• •***** •****"'* ******•*•*••·· PROJECT NO. Y0-205 SAMPLE.NO. 41964 SAMPLE TYPE: WATER SOURCE: KOPPERs·co. INC. STATION ID: OS25DD19705 CASE.NO.: 0 SAS NO.: 5110D
RESULTS UNITS . 025U NG/L . 025UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/l .25U NG/L .025U NG/L . 025UJ NG/l . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 25U NG/L NG/l
** ••*****"*****. ***•• •••••••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: M MCDONALD CITY: MORRISVILL ST: NC COLLECTION START: 11/29/89 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: 05-1 MD NO:
PARAMETER 2.3, 7,8 TCDD(DIOXINJ TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN 2,3, 7.8 TCDF (DIBENZOFURAN) TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) HEPTACHLORODIBEZOFURAN (TOTAL) OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN TEQ(TOXICITY EQUIVALENT VALUE)
01 /22/90
• •• .. .. •• .. ..
•••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01 /22/90
"*"****"*"*********""**********"* ..... ,.. ••*********••··· .... ***** ... ..
•• .. .. ..
.. .. .. •• ..
PROJECT NO. 90-205 SAMPLE NO. 41965 SAMPLE TYPE: WATER SOURCE: KOPPERS CO. INC. STATION ID: OS29DD19706 CASE. NO.: 0 SAS NO.: 5110D
RESULTS UNITS .025U NG/L . 025UJ NG/L . 1 2UJ NG/L . 1 2UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 25U NG/L . 025U NG/L
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: M MCDONALD CITY: MORRISVILL -ST: NC COLLECTION START: 11/29/89 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: 06-1 MD NO:
PARAMETER 2,3, 7,8 TCDD(DIOXINJ TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) PENTACHLOROOIBENZOOIDXIN (TOTAL) HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (TOTAL) HEPTACHLORODIBENZOOIOXIN (TOTAL) OCTACHLOROOIBENZOOIOXIN
• .025UJ NG/L . 1 2UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L . 12UJ NG/L
2.3, 7,8 TCOF CDIBENZOFURANJ TETRACHLOROOIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN (TOTAL) HEPTACHLORODIBEZOFURAN (TOTAL) OCTACHLOROOIBENZOFURAN TEQ(TOXICITY EQUIVALENT VALUE)
. ..
***FOOTNOTES:1••
. 25U NG/L NG/L
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT .