HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCD003200383_19960901_Koppers Co. Inc._FRBCERCLA RA_Baseline Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report-OCRffl
m
n
D
D
D
Fluor Daniel GTI, Inc.
Submitted by:
David J. Wingerd, P.G.
Project Hydrogeologist
FLUOR DANIEL GTI
BASELINE GROUNDWATER MONITORING
AND SAMPLING REPORT
FORMER KOPPERS COMPANY, INC.
SUPERFUND SITE
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Fluor Daniel GTI Project 040030571
September 1996
Prepared for:
Beazer East, Inc.
436 Seventh Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219
RECEIVED
SEP 171996
SUPERFUND SECTION
Fluor Daniel GTI, Inc.
Approved by:
John C. Mitsak, P.E.
Group Manager
637 Braddock Avenue / Easf Pittsburgh, PA 151 12 USA (4 12) 823-5300 FAX (4 12) 824-7215
I
I
I
I
Baseline Groundwater Data Summary Report
Former Koppers Site. Morrisville. NC
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ii
September 1996
On behalf of Beazer East, Inc., Fluor Daniel GTI, Inc. (Fluor Daniel GTI} has prepared this data
summary report for the baseline groundwater monitoring and sampling event conducted at the Former
Koppers Company, Inc., Superfund Site in Morrisville, North Carolina. The baseline groundwater
monitoring and sampling activities were conducted on March 26 through 28, 1996 prior to the initiation
of the groundwater Remedial Action (RA}.
The groundwater flow patterns and relative groundwater elevations are generally consistent with
previous groundwater contours observed during the Remedial Investigation (RI}. The March 1996
shallow and intermediate/deep groundwater elevation data indicate groundwater or potentiometric
highs in the north-central area of the site. Groundwater contour maps for both the shallow and deeper
bedrock zones show apparent groundwater flow radially from these potentiometric highs in all
directions, and the radial flow patterns are asymmetrical due to the presence of structurally controlled
pathways for groundwater flow (i.e, fractures}. The elliptical groundwater flow pattern is more
pronounced in the intermediate and deep wells. Historical contour maps show groundwater flow
originating from the north-central area of the site, where groundwater elevations were also highest in
1991 and 1992.
Pentachlorophenol concentrations exceeding the Record of Decision (ROD} evaluation threshold of 1
ug/L were reported in groundwater samples from six monitoring wells and in the sample from the
recovery well PW-1. Pentachlorophenol concentrations exceeding the Maximum Contaminant Level
(MCL} of 1 ug/L in these seven samples ranged from 2 (J} ug/L in the samples from monitoring wells C-
10B and C-27B to 3,500 ug/L in the sample from monitoring well C-14A.
Three of the 16 groundwater samples collected during the baseline monitoring and sampling event had
2,4-dichlorophenol detected at concentrations greater than or equal to the detection limit of 0.2 ug/L;
however, these concentrations are significantly less than the evaluation threshold of 20 ug/L that is
listed in the ROD for 2,4-dichlorophenol.
Baseline groundwater quality data were evaluated to determine proposed well locations where
groundwater sampling is to occur during the six-month sampling event. Groundwater sampling during
the six-month sampling event is proposed at the seven well locations where pentachlorophenol
concentrations exceeded the MCL of 1 ug/L. The proposed groundwater sampling locations are
monitoring wells C-10B, C-11B, C-14A, C-14B, C-27B, and M-4 and recovery well PW-1.
P :\Reports\Beo zer\Momsvll\10926. rpt
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Baseline Groundwater Data Summary Report
Former Koppers Site, Morrisville, NC
CONTENTS
iii
September 1996
1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................. 1
2.0 BASELINE GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING PROGRAM .............. 1
3.0
4.0
GROUNDWATER FLOW ....................................................... 3
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS ......................... 3
4.1 Baseline Sampling Analytical Results ....................................... 4
4.2 Historical Comparison ................................................... 5
5.0 FUTURE GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING ......................... 6
Figures
1. On-Site and Near Off-site Monitoring Well Locations
2. Groundwater Elevation Contours, Shallow Wells -March 26, 1996
3. Groundwater Elevation Contours, Intermediate/Deep Wells -March 26, 1996
4. Pentachlorophenol Concentrations in Shallow Wells
5. Pentachlorophenol Concentration in Intermediate/Deep Wells
6. 2,4-Dichlorophenol Concentrations in Shallow Wells
7. 2,4-Dichlorophenol Concentrations in Intermediate/Deep Wells
Tables
1. Summary of Groundwater Elevations
2. Summary of Field Purging and Sampling Parameters
3. Summary of Baseline Groundwater Analytical Data
4. Quality Assurance Data for Baseline Groundwater Monitoring Event
5. Comparison of Historical Groundwater Quality Data and Baseline Groundwater Quality Data
Appendices
A.
B.
Field Data Sheets and Chain-of-Custody Forms
Analytical Data
P:\Reponsl8eazer\Momsvl!\r1)926.rpt
FLUOR DANIEL GTI §
D
I
I
m
D
D
D
D
Baseline Groundwater Data Summary Report
Former Koppers Site, Morrisville, NC
1.0 INTRODUCTION
September 1996
This report summarizes the baseline groundwater monitoring and sampling event conducted in March
1996 at the Former Koppers Superfund Site (site) in Morrisville. North Carolina. The Baseline
Groundwater Data Summary Report has been prepared on behalf of Beazer East, Inc. by Fluor Daniel
GTI, Inc. (Fluor Daniel GTI}. The groundwater monitoring program described in Section 2.0 below is
being conducted to fulfill U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements of completing an
evaluation of groundwater quality data prior to the groundwater Remedial Action (RA) for the site. The
March 1996 sampling event was conducted prior to the initiation of groundwater extraction at well PW-
1 and treatment of recovered groundwater. As required to implement the groundwater RA,
groundwater sampling occurred at select monitoring wells and from the recovery well PW-1.
Groundwater samples were collected at sixteen wells in accordance with the EPA-approved
Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan contained in the Remedial Action Work Plan
(Cummings/Riter, May 1995) and the general groundwater sampling procedures listed in the U.S. EPA
Region IV Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual (EPA Region IV SOP/QAM,
February, 1991). Site-wide groundwater elevation measurements were taken on March 26, 1996 prior
to groundwater sampling by Fluor Daniel GTI personnel. Field groundwater measurements (i.e., water
levels, pH, specific conductance, and temperature) were recorded during purging activities, which
occurred on March 26 through 28, 1996. Groundwater samples were collected on March 27 and 28,
1996.
Section 2.0 of this report provides the description of the groundwater monitoring and sampling program
for the baseline event. Section 3.0 of this report provides a description of the groundwater flow
patterns. Groundwater quality data are discussed in Section 4.0. Section 5.0 discusses the proposed
future groundwater monitoring and sampling program of the site.
2.0 BASELINE GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING PROGRAM
Baseline groundwater monitoring and sampling was conducted prior to the implementation of the
groundwater RA. On March 26, 1996, in order to establish baseline groundwater elevations, water
level measurements were conducted at 51 on-site and near offsite monitoring wells and the recovery
well locations shown on Figure 1. The baseline groundwater sampling program consisted of collection
of groundwater samples from sixteen wells. Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring
wells C-1 B, C-9B, C-10A, C-10B, C-116, C-12A, C-13B. C-14A, C-14B, C-15B, C-27A, C-27B, C-28A,
C-29B, and M-4 and extraction well PW-1.
Shallow monitoring wells at the Koppers Morrisville site were completed within the uppermost water-
bearing unit encountered. The shallow A-series wells are generally completed at depths of less than
P:\Reports\Beazer\Mornsvlll/0926.rpt
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Baseline Groundwater Data Summary Report
Former Koppers Site. Morrisville, NC
2
September 1996
30 feet below ground surface. Intermediate and deep wells (B-and C-series wells, respectively) were
completed in bedrock.
Table 1 provides the water level and well depth measurements for the well locations and the
groundwater elevations determined from the site-wide water level measurements made on March 26,
1996. Static water level measurements and total well depth were recorded lo an accuracy of 0.01 feet.
The data from groundwater level measurements and the current total well depth were used to calculate
the volume of water to be purged from each monitoring well. Each monitoring well was purged to
remove at least three well volumes of water, and until the pH, conductivity and temperature have
stabilized to within 10% on consecutive readings unless the well was purged dry, or until five well
volumes were removed. Monitoring wells that are known to have a low recovery rate (e.g. well C-10B)
were purged and groundwater allowed to recovery prior to sampling. Shallow "A''-series wells and low
yielding bedrock wells were generally purged dry and allowed to recovery before sampling. Well
purging data are summarized in Table 2. Field data sheets are included in Appendix A.
Groundwater purging was completed using two-inch submersible pumps (Grundfos Redi-Flow II
pumps) using dedicated tubing. Any tubing submerged in water in the well was made of Teflon, and
the remaining tubing to the surface was polyethylene or Nalgene. Teflon tubing was dedicated to each
well, and was wrapped in plastic, identified and stored for future use.
Water generated from monitoring well purging at on-site and off-site well locations was collected at the
wells in five-gallon buckets or 55-gallon drums and transferred into the on-site tanks located in area of
the groundwater treatment building.
Groundwater samples were collected using bottom-filling Teflon ballers dedicated to each well, which
were either left in each monitoring well after sampling was completed or were wrapped, identified and
stored for future use. Quality control samples collected included one field duplicate sample, C-200,
collected at well C-11 B, one equipment blank and one set of matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate
samples at well C-9B. The equipment blank sample was not analyzed due to inadequate sample
volume following breakage of one of the sample containers. The remaining quality control samples
received were analyzed for the same parameters as the groundwater samples.
Groundwater samples were placed under chain-of-custody and shipped to REC RA Environmental,
lnc.'s laboratory in Amherst, New York. Chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix A. Samples
were analyzed for two acid extractable phenolic compounds (2,4-dichlorophenol and
pentachlorophenol) by EPA Method 8270B, using ion trap technology. This gas chromatography/mass
spectrometer method using ion trap technology achieves the required detection limits. Analytical
results for the RA baseline sampling event are contained in Appendix B.
P:\Reports\Beazer\Momsvll\/0926.rpt
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
g
I
I
0
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Baseline Groundwater Data Summary Report
Former Koppers Site, Morrisville, NC
3.0 GROUNDWATER FLOW
3
September 1996
The depth to groundwater relative to an established measurement point on the well casing was
measured at each well on March 26, 1996. Water level data were used to determine the groundwater
elevations in feet above mean sea level (msl) listed in Table 1. Groundwater elevations were used to
construct the groundwater elevation contour maps of the shallow water-bearing zone and the
intermediate and deep monitoring zone, presented as Figures 2 and 3, respectively.
As was observed during the previous Remedial Investigation (RI) groundwater monitoring events, the
RA baseline shallow and intermediate/deep groundwater elevation data indicate areas of groundwater
or potentiometric highs in the north-central area of the site. Groundwater contour maps for both the
shallow and deeper bedrock zones show a distorted radial groundwater flow from this potenUometric
high in all directions. The radial flow patterns are asymmetrical due to the presence of structurally
controlled pathways for groundwater flow (i.e. fractures). In the shallow monitoring zone, radial
groundwater flow occurs from a groundwater high at the north-central area of the site defined by wells
C-4A, C-5A and C-6A. The groundwater gradient in the southwesterly direction is steeper than in the
groundwater flow to the southeast. In the intermediate and deep wells, the potentiometric high occurs
about well C-12B. The elliptical groundwater flow pattern is more pronounced in the bedrock
monitored by intermediate and deep wells.
The groundwater flow patterns and relative groundwater elevations are generally consistent with
previous groundwater measurements and contours prepared for the RI. The historical contour maps
show groundwater flow originating from the north-central area of the site, where groundwater
elevations were also highest in 1991 and 1992. Following the completion of the drainage and filling of
the fire pond as part of the RA for the site, a less steep hydraulic gradient is now apparent in the former
area of the fire pond and in the former lagoon area.
4.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
Groundwater samples collected during the RA baseline groundwater sampling event were analyzed for
pentachlorophenol and 2,4-dichlorophenol by EPA Method 8270B, using ion trap technology. This
analytical method provides a detection limit of 1.0 micrograms per liter (ug/L). In addition, field pH and
specific conductivity were measured at the time samples were collected.
P:IReports\Beaze~Momsvll\(1)926.rpt
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Baseline Groundwater Data Summary Report
Former Koppers Site, Morrisville, NC
4.1 Baseline Sampling Analytical Results
4
September 1996
Table 3 summarizes the groundwater quality data collected during the RA baseline groundwater
sampling event conducted on March 27 and 28, 1996. The 16 groundwater samples and quality
assurance/quality control (QNQC) samples were analyzed for two acid extractable phenolic
constituents, pentachlorophenol and 2,4-dichlorophenol, by EPA Method 8270B using ion trap
technology to achieve detection limits less than or equal to 1 ug/L. The Maximum Contaminant Level
(MCL) for pentachlorophenol is 1.0 ug/L. The groundwater quality data for these wells are shown on
Figures 4 through 7.
Pentachlorophenol concentrations exceeding the MCL were reported in groundwater samples from six
monitoring wells (C-10B, C-11B, C-14A, C-14B, C-27B, and M-4) and in the sample from the recovery
well PW-1. Detected pentachlorophenol concentrations exceeding the MCL of 1 ug/L in these seven
samples ranged from 2 (J) ug/L in the samples from monitoring wells C-10B and C-27B to 3,500 ug/L
in the sample from monitoring well C-14A.
The intermediate well C-14B, adjacent to well C-14Awhere the maximum pentachlorophenol
concentration was reported, had a detected pentachlorophenol concentration of 19 ug/L.
The groundwater sample from near offsite well C-11 B had pentachlorophenol detected at a
concentration of 29 ug/L. The concentration of pentachlorophenol reported in the extraction well PW-1
sample was also 29 ug/L. The sample collected from lhe shallow monitoring well adjacent to extraction
well PW-1, monitoring well M-4, had a pentachlorophenol concentration of 10 ug/L detected.
Three groundwater samples had 2,4-dichlorophenol detected at concentrations greater than or equal
to the detection limit of 0.2 ug/L. The groundwater sample from well C-14A had an estimated 2,4-
dichlorophenol concentration of 0.2(J) ug/L. Groundwater samples from wells C-298 and PW-1 had
reported 2,4-dichlorophenol concentrations of 0.3 ug/L and 0.4 ug/L, respectively. These detected
concentrations are significantly less than the evaluation threshold listed in the ROD for 2,4-
dichlorophenol of 20 ug/L, which is a North Carolina groundwater quality standard.
Sample C-200 (field duplicate of well C-11 B) had concentrations of 2,4-dichlorophenol and
pentachlorophenol similar to those detected in the C-11 B sample. The ONQC data are presented in
Table 4. The field (equipment rinsate) blank was not analyzed due to inadequate sample volume,
following the breakage of one of the sample containers.
P :\Reperts\Beazer\Momsvll\r0926. 11)1
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
D
D
D
m
D
D
I
I
I
I
Baseline Groundwater Data Summary Report
Former Koppers Site, Morrisville, NC
4.2 H lstorlcal Comparison
5
September 1996
A comparison of the RA baseline groundwater quality data to the historical groundwater quality data
obtained during the RI and Remedial Design (RD) sampling events is provided in Table 5.
Groundwater sampling locations selected for the baseline groundwater sampling were generally those
where pentachlorophenol was detected during the RI.
The baseline pentachlorophenol detections are generally consistent with historical groundwater
analytical data. As in past groundwater quality data, pentachlorophenol was reported at the highest
concentrations in the former lagoon area. Pentachlorophenol was reported in the RA baseline
groundwater sample from well C-14A at a concentration of 3,500 ug/L, which is the highest
pentachlorophenol concentration reported. This observation indicates a generally increasing trend
from the first round (889 ug/L) and second round (2,010 ug/L) RI samples and in the RD sampling
event (1,600 ug/L). Whereas, the pentachlorophenol concentrations in monitoring well C-14B have
continuously decreased from a maximum concentration of 499 ug/L (Method 8040) in the first round RI
sample to 124 ug/L in the second round RI sample to 19 ug/L in the RA baseline sample.
At monitoring well C-27 A, located at the northern end of the former lagoon area, pentachlorophenol
was detected in one of three RI sampling events at a concentration of 48.4 (J) ug/L (confirmational
round), and was less than the detection limit in the RA baseline sampling event.
The concentration of pentachlorophenol at well C-118 has increased from 9.8 ug/L in the first round RI
groundwater sample to 29 ug/L (and 26 ug/L in the C-118 duplicate sample) collected during the RA
baseline groundwater sampling event. This well is at a location that is hydraulically downgradient of
the extraction well PW-1. Concentrations of pentachlorophenol in PW-1 samples have also decreased
from 120 ug/L and 159 ug/L observed during the RD sampling event in October 1993 to a
concentration of 29 ug/L in the RA baseline groundwater sample.
The concentrations of pentachlorophenol in well M-4, the shallow well adjacent to PW-1, decreased
from 99.2 ug/L (Method 8040) in the first round RI sample to 10 ug/L in the RA baseline sample.
Pentachlorophenol in intermediate well M-29B located adjacent to PW-1 has also decreased from 291
ug/L and 968 ug/L (Method 8040) in the first and second RI sampling rounds, respectively, to less than
the detection limit in the RA baseline groundwater sample.
Concentrations of penlachlorophenol in well C-28A were less than the detection limit in two of the three
RI sampling rounds and the RA baseline sampling round; the second round RI sample from well C-28A
had a concentrating of 26 ug/L (Method 8040).
P:\Repons1Beazor\Momsvl!\r0926.f?t
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
Baseline Groundwater Data Summary Report
Former Koppers Site. Morrisville, NC
6
September 1996
Samples collected from monitoring wells C-1 B, C-1 OA, and C-1 OB located at the northern section of the
site show a decreasing trends of pentachlorophenol concentrations. Additionally, the
pentachlorophenol concentration detected in the RA baseline sample from well C-9B was less than the
detection limit.
The concentrations of 2,4-dichlorophenol in the samples collected from monitoring well C-1 B have
decreased from 35.8 ug/L in the first RI sampling round and 9.24 (J) ug/L in the second RI sampling
round to less than the detection limit in the RA baseline groundwater sample. The pentachlorophenol
concentrations at the C-1 B well location decreased from the detection of 7.77(J) ug/L in the second RI
sampling round only to less than the detection limit in the baseline sample.
Pentachlorophenol concentrations have also decreased at the C-10A and C-10B locations.
Pentachlorophenol in the C-1 OA samples decreased from 3.82 ug/L (Method 8040) detected in the first
RI sampling round to less than the detection limit in the RA baseline sampling event, and decreased in
the C-1 OB samples from 113 ug/L (Method 8040) in the first RI sample round to an estimated
concentration of 2 (J) ug/L in the RA baseline sample.
5.0 FUTURE GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING
The first scheduled activity following the start-up of the groundwater RA is the quarterly groundwater
monitoring event, when the measurement of groundwater levels in 51 monitoring wells will be
completed. This work is scheduled to be completed approximately 180 days after the start-up of the
groundwater extraction and treatment system. Based on the start date of the groundwater RA, the next
round of groundwater sampling and analysis is scheduled to occur six months following the start-up of
the groundwater RA.
The RA baseline monitoring groundwater event data was evaluated to determine the locations of future
sampling. Groundwater sampling during the six-month sampling program will include well locations
where pentachlorophenol concentrations exceeded the MCL of 1 ug/L. Based on the RA baseline
groundwater quality data, groundwater sampling will be completed at wells C-10B, C-11 B, C-14A, C-
14B, C-27B, M-4 and PW-1 ..
P:\Reports1Beazef\lvlomsvll\r0926. rpt
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
I
D
0 TABLES
0
0
0
D
D
D
E
u
u
u
I
u
m
u
m P:\Reports1Seazer\Momsvll\r0926.rpt
m
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
I
0
0
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Well
No.
C-1A
C-1 B
C-2A
C-2B
C-3A
C-3B
C-4A
C-5A
C-6A
C-7A
C-8A
C-9A
C-9B
C-9C
C-10A
C-10B
C-11A
C-11B
C-12A
C-12B
C-12C
C-13A
C-13B
C-14A
C-14B
C-15A
C-15B
C-16C
C-17C
C-18C
C-19C
C-20C
C-21C
C-22C
C-23C
C-24C
C-25A
C-25B
TABLE 1
Summary of Groundwater Elevations
During Baseline Monitoring and Sampling -March 26, 1996
Former Koppers Company, Inc. Site
Morrisville, North Carolina
Top of Depth
Casing to
Water Baseline Elevation Water
Measurement Samnling ffeet msll fleet\
X X 383.06 17.02
X 383.35 70.99
X 380.76 14.15
X 381.72 15.24
X 380.21 14.24
X 380.69 17.24
X 385.31 10.51
X 386.59 11.26
X 383.90 9.35
X 374.30 8.56
X 376.34 27.23
X 372.98 8.80
X X 374.76 12.15
X 374.34 11.46
X X 373.88 7.24
X X 373.58 12.72
X 363.28 7.02
X X 363.28 0.00
X X 375.00 4.95
X 375.75 4.82
X 376.11 150.14
X 367.31 5.07
X X 367.02 1.02
X X 371.13 4.68
X X 371.66 6.12
X 357.08 3.07
X X 357.62 1.87
X 368.37 15.31
X 382.29 18.28
400.47 NM
X 365.84 10.81
X 378.17 23.45
361.04 NM
X 355.24 4.04
359.49 NM
335.81 NM
X 365.52 15.85
X 364.85 15.66
p:\reports\beazer\morrisv\r0926t1 .wk4 6/96 Page 1 of 2
Groundwater
Elevation
March 26, 1996
lfeet msll
366.04
312.36
366.61
366.48
365.97
363.45
374.80
375.33
374.55
365.74
349.11
364.18
362.61
362.88
366.64
360.86
356.26
363.28 *
370.05
370.93
225.97
362.24
366.00
366.45
365.54
354.01
355.75
353.06
364.01
----
355.03
354.72
----
351.20
----
----
349.67
349.19
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
0
0
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 1
Summary of Groundwater Elevations
During Baseline Monitoring and Sampling -March 26, 1996
Former Koppers Company, Inc. Site
Morrisville, North Carolina
Top of
Casing
Well Water Baseline Elevation
No. Measurement Samnlina ffeet msll
C-26A X 382.12
C-26B X 382.21
C-27A X X 372.10
C-27B X X 372.01
C-28A X X 372.40
C-28B X 373.07
C-29B X X 369.00
C-30A X 379.11
C-31A X 379.98
C-32C X 368.88
C-33A X 354.37
C-33B X 352.84
C-33C X 353.54
C-34B X 376.31
C-34C X 376.39
M-4 X X 368.83
M-9 X 372.14
PW-1 X X 371.29
52 16
• -Static water level at well C-11 B at top of casing.
Groundwater elevation at well higher than 363.28 feet ms!.
p:\reports\beazer\morrisv\r0926t1 .wk4 6/96 Page 2 of 2
Depth
to
Water
ffeetl
15.87
26.50
5.70
5.53
4.71
5.09
2.56
14.17
17.64
21.95
4.93
6.87
69.32
14.85
16.10
4.67
NM
4.90
Groundwater
Elevation
March 26, 1996
/feet msll
366.25
355.71
366.40
366.48
367.69
367.98
366.44
364.94
362.34
346.93
349.44
345.97
284.22
361.46
360.29
364.16
NM
366.39
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
!!!!!I l!!!!!!I l!!!!!!I !!!!!I l!!!9
Depth
lo Water Estimated
Well Well Purge Before · ·watei
Well Depth Diameler S1art Purging Volume·-
loc.i.tion (I!) {\~) Date Time (flL___(g•I)
C-18 102.24 2 03/26 16:52 70.99 5.09
C-98 62.41 2 03/26 17:45 12.15 8.19
C-10A 35.37 2 03127 12:25 7.42 4.56
C-10B 158.00 6 03127 11:30 12.72 227
C-118 65.04 2 03/27 07:10 0.00 10.6
C-12A 47.27 2 03/27 09:15 4.95 6.90
C-13B 70.40 2 03/28 07:20 1.02 11.3
C-14A 30.33 2 03/28 14:55 4.68 4.18
C-14B 65.93 2 03/28 14:05 6.12 9.75
C-15B 109.76 2 03/28 16:45 1.87 17.6
C-27A 30.46 2 03128 12:45 5.70 4.04
C-27B 46.05 2 03/28 12:10 5.53 6.60
C-28A 16.82 2 03128 08:50 4.71 1.97
C-29B 50.35 2 03127 17:45 2.56 7.79
M-4 18.82 2 03/27 18:20 4.67 2.31
PW-1 51.94 6 03/27 15:55 4.90 73.4
NO.TES:
• -Indicates monitoring v1e!I v1as purged dry.
Volume
.Purg•d
(g!:.f)
7.0 •
29 •
13.8
235 •
42.4
21
22
8.0 •
29.4
21
14.0 •
19.8
6.0
23.4
3.0 •
210
~
TABLE 2
Summary of Field Sampling Parameters
March 26 -28, 1996
pH
at Two
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, North Carolina
.. .. . Specific
Well Volumes ... P~.;=•-'='-al ~nd· ;,:=:/:>:-:t-f~c:~{i:.Ci-
PUrQ"ed .,--~, PUfgi~'g :\';, Y,f1~m:•·~· pu·rg!f
(SI) ·.(SI)·.· · ;_,,,.,, .. :,•(Urtl_~O•)·::-
6.99
7.14 7.39 180
7.24 7.30 36S
8.57
7.80 7.93 442
7.67 7.75 235
8.24
7.50
7.83 7.84 315
8.54
10.97 8.51 800
7.29 7.29 700
7.44 7.40 430
7.63 7.57 425
7.58
7.34 7.46 380
440
231
405
391
600
248
340
600
310
310
900
700
430
420
890
405
==
15 03/27 14:05 Brown, turbid, poor recovery
12 03/27 08:30 Clear, collected MSIMSD
12 03/27 13:30 Clear
13 03/28 08:20 Ughl brown, slightly lurbid, poor recovery, odor
15 03127 07:50 Clear, odor, collected field duplicate C-200
16 03/27 10:00 Brown, turbid
13 03/28 07:55 Clear, odor
12 03128 15:15 Ughl brown, slightly lurbid, odor
14 03/26 14:30 Clear, odor
14 03/28 17:12 Brown, turbid, slow recharge and recovery
14 03/28 13:15 Brown, turbid, purge pH high
15 03/26 12:30 Cloar with odor
13 03/26 09:10 Brown, turbid, slow recharge
15 03/27 18:05 Clear, odor
11 03/27 18:45 Brown, turbid
14 03/27 17:05 Clear, odor
FlUOR DANIEL GTI ~
l!!!!!I l!!!!I !l!!!I I!!!! l!!!!I l!!!!I
Pentachlorophenol
~
<1
TABLE 3
Summary of Baseline Groundwater
Analytical Data -EPA method 8270
Using Ion Trap Technology
Former Koppers Superfund Site
<1 <1
Values represent total concentrations unless noted < = Not detected at indicated reporting limit •·=Not analyzed
J = Estimated value
l!SI l!IIEa ma
Page: 1 A of 1C
Date: 07 /16/96
2J 29
1!!1!11 l!!!!!!I 19!!!1
Pentachlorophenol <1
1111!1 ===
TABLE 3
Summary of Baseline Groundwater
Analytical Data -EPA method 8270
Using Ion Trap Technology
Former Koppers Superfund Site
3500 19
Values represent total concentrations unless noted < = Not detected at indicated reporting limit --= Not analyzed
J = Estimated value
~ liiiil
Page: 18 of 1C
Date: 07 /16/96
<1
~ !!!!! I!!!!
Pentach1orophenol <t
-TABLE 3
Summary of Baseline Groundwater
Analytical Data -EPA method 8270
Using Ion Trap Technology
Former Koppers Superfund Site
<1 10
Values represent total concentrations unless noted < =Not detected at indicated reporting limit --=Not analyzed
J = Estimated value
ml Eiiil mill
Page: 1 C of 1 C
Date: 07 /16/96
29
- -- - --
SAMPLE
INFORMATION
SITE
FIELD SAMPLE NO
LAB CODE
LAB SAMPLE NO
CASE NO
For Period 96-Q-01(01/01/96 to 03/31/96)
-- -- -
PRIMARY
SAMPLE
Cl 1 B
RCRLN
TABLE 4
Quality Assurance Data for Baseline
Groundwater Monitoring
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, North Carolina
FIRST
DUPLICATE
Cl 1 B
C-200
RCRLN
SECOND
DUPLICATE
l!!!!!I l!!!!I
THIRD
DUPLICATE
FOURTH
DUPLICATE
liiiliiil Giiil
Page: 1 of 1
Date: 07 /16/96
PRECISION
SUMMARY
RELATIVE
PERCENT
DIFFERENCE
(RPDI
RPO RPO
-- - --
C-01B
July 1990
RI Round 1
Well Method 8040
2, 4-Dichlorophenol (ug/L) 35.8
Pentachlorophenol (ug/L) 4.0 u
Pentachlorophenol • (ug/L) 0.216
- -
C-01B
October 1990
RI Round 2
Method 8040
9.24 J
7.77 J
0.228
-l!!!!!!I l!!!!!!I I!!!!!! !!!!I
TABLE 5
Comparison of Historical Groundwater Quality Data and
Baseline Groundwater Quality Data
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, NC
C-01B C-01B C-09B
October 1993 March 1996 July 1990
RD Baseline RI Round 1
Method 8270 Method 8270B Method 8040
10.0 u 0.2 U 0.731 U
10.0 u 1 U 1.0 U
0.05 U
NOTE: • -Pentachlorophenol concentration determined by EPA Method 515
during Remedial Investigation.
p lreports.lbeazer\morrisv\r0926T5 wk4 6/96 Page 1 ol 9
em == == liiiiil iiii
C-09B C-09B C-09B
October 1990 November 1993 March 1996
RI Round 2 RD Baseline
Method 8040 Method 8270 Method 8270B
0.5 U 10.0U 0.2 U
1.0 U 10.0 U 1 U
0.101
FLUOR DANIEL GTI
- - -
Well
2,4-0ichlorophenol
Pentachtorophenol
Pentachlorophenol "
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
- - -- - - -
l!!!!!!!I
TABLE 5 (Continued)
Comparison of Historical Groundwater Quality Data and
Baseline Groundwater Quality Data
C-10A
June 1990
RI Round 1
Method 8040
0.5 U
3.82
1.98
C-10A
October 1990
RI Round 2
Method 8040
0.5 U
1.0 u
0.264
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, NC
C-10A C-10A
November 1993 March 1996
RD Baseline
Method 8270 Method 82708
10.0U 0.2 U
10.0 U 1 U
NOTE: "• Pentachlarophenol concentration determined by EPA Method 515
during Remedial Investigation.
C-108
October 1990
RI Round 2
Method 8040
21.8
113
46.5
p·\teponsloeazerlmorm;vl.r0926T5 wk4 6/96 Page 2 of 9
I!!!!! == == r:;;;; lliiiiiil liiiii
C-108 C-108 C-108
January 1992 November 1993 March 1996
RI Confirmational RD Baseline
Method 8270 Method 8270 Method 8270B
312 10.0 U 0.2 U
23.9 10.0 U 2 J
2.51
FLUOR DANiEL GTI ~
- --- -
Well
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Pentachlorophenol • (ug/L)
C-118
July 1990
RI Round 1
Method 8040
0.5 U
9.8
16 J
- - - -- -
!!!!!!!!
C-118
October 1990
RI Round 2
Method 8040
0.5
12.6
7.59
TABLE 5 (Continued)
Comparison of Historical Groundwater Quality Data and
Baseline Groundwater Quality Data
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, NC
C-11 B C-11 B C-11 B Dup. (C-200)
November 1993 March 1996 March 1996
RD Baseline Baseline
Method 8270 Method 8270B Method 8270B
10.0U 0.2 u 0.2 u
10.0U 29 26
NOTE: • -Pentachlorophenol concentration determined by EPA Method 515
during Remedial Investigation.
p \repon-;lbeazer\rnorrisv\r0926 IS wk4 6/SO Page 3 ot 9
l!!!!!!I
C-12A
June 1990
RI Round 1
Method 8040
0.5 U
1.0 U
0.032
==
C-12A
October 1990
RI Round 2
Method 8040
0.5 U
1.0 U
0.01 U
lilliiil
C-12A
October 1993
RD
Method 8270
10.0 UJ
10.0 UJ
liiiiii
-- -- - --l!!!!!!!!I l!!!!!!!I I!!!!!!! !!!!!! !!!!!!!!I !!!!!!!!I ==
Well
2,4-Dichlorophenol (ug/L)
Pentachlorophenol (ug/L)
Pentachloropheno1 * (ug/L)
C-12A C-13B
March 1996 June 1990
Baseline RI Round 1
Method 8270B Method 8040
0.2 U 0.5 U
1 U 1.0 u
0.213
TABLE 5 (Continued)
Comparison of Historical Groundwater Quality Data and
Baseline Groundwater Quality Data
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, NC
C-13B C-13B C-13B
October 1990 January 1992 November 1993
RI Round 2 RI Confirmational RD
Method 8040 Method 8270 Method 8270
0.5 U 0.5 U 10.0U
1.0 U 0.5 U 10.0 U
0.105 0.158
NOTE: * -Pentachtorophenol concentration determined by EPA Method 515
during Remedial Investigation.
p.lreportslbeazerlmomsv\r0926T5 wk4 6196 Page 4of9
C-13B
March 1996
Baseline
Method 8270B
0.2 U
1 U
== ;;;;a ;;;;a iiii
C-14A C-14A
June 1990 October 1990
RI Round 1 RI Round 2
Method 8040 Method 8040
0.5 U 0.5 U
889 2010
1490 1120
- --- - --l!!!!!!!I l!!!!!!!I !!!!!I !!!!!I I!!!!!!! II!!!! ==
Well
2,4-Dichlorophenol (ug/L)
Pentachlorophenol (ug/L)
Pentachlorophenol • (ug/L)
C-14A C-14A
November 1993 March 1996
RD Baseline
Method 8270 Method 82706
10.0 u 0.2 J
1600 3500
TABLE 5 (Continued)
Comparison of Historical Groundwater Quality Data and
Baseline Groundwater Quality Data
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, NC
C-148 C-146 C-146
June 1990 October 1990 November 1993
RI Round 1 Rl Round 2 RD
Method 8040 Method 8040 Method 8270
0.5 U 0.5 U 10.0 U
499 124 10.0U
570 50.6
NOTE: • -Pentachlorophenol concentration determined by EPA Method 515
during Remedial Investigation.
p.lrepof1s\beazer\mornsv\r0926T5 wk4 6196 Page 5 o! 9
C-146
March 1996
Baseline
Method 82706
0.2 U
19
==
C-156
July 1990
RI Round 1
Method 8040
0.5 U
1.60
0.125
llai1
C-158
October 1990
RI Round 2
Method 8040
0.5 U
1.0 U
0.01 U
FlUOR DAN.IEL GTI ~
liiii
-- ---- -
C-158 C-158
January 1992 November 1993
- --l!!!!!!I I!!!!!! !!!!I
TABLE 5 (Continued)
Comparison of Historical Groundwater Quality Data and
Baseline Groundwater Quality Data
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, NC
C-158 C-27A C-27A
March 1996 May 1990 October 1990
C-27A
January 1992
RI Confirmationat RD Baseline RI Round 1 RI Round 2 RI Confirmational
Well
2,4-Dichlorophenol (ug/L)
Pentachlorophenol (ug/L)
Pentachlorophenol • (ug/L)
Method 8270 Method 8270 Method 82708 Method 8040
0.50 U 10.0 U 0.2 U 0.5 UJ
0.50 U 10.0U 1 U 1 UJ
0.036 U 0.016
NOTE: • -Pentachlorophenol concentration determined by EPA Method 515
during Remedial Investigation.
p \report&lbeaierlmorusv\t0926T5 wk4 6196 Page 6of9
Method 8040 Method 8270
0.5 u 0.5 U
u 48.4 J
0.035 7.25
== == a;; lliiiiil iiiii
C-27A C-27A
November 1993 March 1996
RD Baseline
Method 8270 Method 82708
10.0U 0.2 U
10.0U 1 U
FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
--- - -
Well
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol *
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
C-27B
June 1990
Rt Round 1
Method 8040
0.5 U
4.23
3.19
--
C-27B
October 1990
Rl Round 2
Method 8040
0.5 U
4.18 u
2.82
- -- - --
TABLE 5 (Continued)
Comparison of Historical Groundwater Quality Data and
Baseline Groundwater Quality Data
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, NC
C-27B C-27B C-28A
November 1993 March 1996 May 1990
RD Baseline RI Round 1
Method 8270 Method 8270B Method 8040
10.0 u 0.2 UJ 0.5 U
10.0U 2 J 1.0 u
1.23
NOTE: • -Pentachlorophenol concentration determined by EPA Method 515
during Remedial Investigation.
p \report>,lbealerlmorri~vlr0926T5 wk4 6/96 Page 7 of 9
I!!!!!!! I!!!!! 1!!11!! liiiiiil
C-28A C-28A C-28A
October 1990 November 1993 March 1996
RI Round 2 RD Baseline
Method 8040 Method 8270 Method 8270B
0.5 U 10.0 U 0.2 U
26 10.0 U 1 U
14.9
FlUOR DANIEL GTI ~
-- - - -
Well
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Pentachlorophenol * (ug/L)
C-29B
July 1990
RI Round 1
Method 8040
0.5 U
591
1190
- -
C-29B
October 1990
RI Round 2
Method 8040
0.5 U
968
488
- -- -
11!!!!1
TABLE 5 (Continued)
Comparison of Historical Groundwater Quality Data and
Baseline Groundwater Quality Data
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, NC
C-29B C-29B M-4
November 1993 March 1996 July 1990
RD Baseline RI Round 1
Method 8270 Method 8270B Method 8040
10.0 u 0.3 0.5 U
17 u 99.2
179
NOTE: • -Pentachlorophenol concentration determined by EPA Method 515
during Remedial Investigation
p.\reports\beazer\momsw0926T5.w~_,: 6/96 Page 8019
l!!!!!!I
M-4
October 1990
RI Round 2
Method 8040
0.5 U
69.1
34.4
==
M-4
March 1996
Baseline
Method 8270B
0.2 U
10
mil
.~ FlUOR DANIEL GTI ';:I
liiiii
----
Well
2,4-0ichlorophenol (ug/L)
Pentachtorophenol (ug/L)
Pentachlorophenol ~ (ug/L)
-- -
TABLE 5 (Continued)
ison of Historical Groundwater Quality Data and
Baseline Groundwater Quality Data
Former Koppers Superfund Site
Morrisville, NC
PW-1 PW-1 (Dup)
October 1993 October 1993
RD RD
Method 8270 Method 8270
10.0U 10.0U
120 159
l!!!!!!!I
PW-1
March 1996
Baseline
Method 8270B
0.4
29
I!!!!!!
NOTE: • -Pentachlorophenol concentration determined by EPA Method 515
during Remedial Investigation.
p \reponslC>eazer\morrisv\r092615 wk4 6/96 Page 9of 9
l!!!!I == == lliia liiiiiil
.~ FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
I
I
g FIGURES
n
g
D
0
0
D
D
D
R
I
m
m
I
I
I P:\Reports\Beazer\Momsvll\r0926 rpt
I FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
D
□ 0
0 0
~C98
C9A C9C
0
c::::J
c:::J =
C)
LJ
... C38
C3A
lb
C33A
C33B
C33CI
THIS DRAWING AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ('DRAWINGs"), HAVE BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE SOLE USE OF THE RECIPIENT
ANO MUST NOT BE USED, REUSED, REPRODUCED. MODIFIED OR COPIED ('USE."') IN AN'f MANNER WITHOUT PRIOR
WRITTEN APPROVAL OF FLUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. THIS DRAWING MAY CONTAIN CONFlOENTIAL ANO PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION OF FLUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF~THIS DRAWING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
C348
C34C
__.i___ C26A
T C26B
.. '· . --
~ 0
0
+
CBA
LEGEND
+ MONITORING WELL LOCATION
BEAZER EAST, INC.
PROPERT( BOUNDARY
UNIT STRUCTURES INC.
PROPERTf BOUNDARY
SCALE (FEET)
l""w'=-
D 200 400 600
~
FLUOR DANIEL GTI
637 BRADDOCK AVENUE
EAST PITTSBURGH, PA 15112
PHONE: ( 412) 823-5300
FAX: (412) 824-7215
REV. NO.: DRAWING DATE:
1 6/10/96
ACAD FILE:
96057101.DWG
ON SITE AND NEAR OFF SITE
MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
CLIENT:
BEAZER EAST, INC.
LOCATION:
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
DESIGNED: DETAILED: PROJECT NO.:
C.W. RAM. 04003-0571
. ·':
PM:
J.C.M.
PE/RG:
c.w.
FIGURE:
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
0
D
0 D
•
0
C9A+
(364.18)
0
c:::J
c::::::::J
c::::::J <:?
/
ltc1A
1
\ I (366.04)
I C2A \ I (366.61)
I
\
\ °' Q ', -
CJ
C3A
(365.97)
//J
THIS DRAWING AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ("DRAWINGS"}, HAVE BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE SOL£ USE OF THE RECIPIENT
ANO MUST NOT BE USED, REUSED, REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR COPIED ("USE'") IN AN'f MANNER WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL OF FLUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. THIS DRAWING MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL ANO PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION OF flUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. ANY UNAlJTHORIZED USE OF THIS DRAWING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
~33A (349.44) -d o
0
' Cl
' ', 01). \
A \ ~\-, ---7
Q
' \ I , '?---J
I
LEGEND
+ MONITORING WELL LOCATTON
{354.01} GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
(FEET MSL)
BEAZER EAST, INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
UNIT STRUCTURES INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
INFERRED GROUNDWATER
CONTOUR
SCALE (FEET) ,.._._
0 200 400 600
5'
FLUOR DANIEL GTI
637 BRADDOCK AVENUE
EAST PITTSBURGH, PA 15112
PHONE, ( 412) 823-5300
FAX, ( 412) 824-7215
REV. NO., DRAWING DATE, ACAD FILE,
1 6/1 0/96 96057102.DWG
ROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS
SHALLOW WELLS
26 MARCH 1996
CLIENT,
BEAZER EAST, INC.
LOCATION,
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
DESIGNED, DETAILED, PROJECT NO.,
C.W. R.A.M. 04003-0571
PM,
J.C.M.
PE/RG,
c.w.
FIGURE,
2
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
C33B (345.97l
C33C 284.22 -;•"
~,.II /✓ /-;<§> / _..,.. :). / _,....-;'{ _..,.. / /4".,
.,.... //-;<:,?>
lb //
LJ /
I
• c::::::i
i::::=::J c:= ,:;::>
a
D 0
D 0 a
ad] [1, oo
/ -,,"'
C9B C2B (362.61) (366.48) • C9C / o. I (362.88) .,_ Q 0 :f
__..,...,-"':,'° + "ot<
C3B ":J __..,...,-(363.45)
THIS DRAWING AND fJ.N'f ATTACHMENTS (" DRAWINGs"). HAVE BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE SOLE USE OF THE RECIPIENT
AND MUST NOT BE USED, REUSED, REPRODUCED, "4001FlEO OR COPIED ("USE"') IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT PRIOR
WRITTEN APPROVAL OF FLUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. THIS DRAWING MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION OF FLUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. Atf'f UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THIS DRAWING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
~ 0
0 wb \ 0 V 0 ..,.
"' ,,.,
I
"' :q
\ &
/~
;i
/ (349
CEMETERY
I
I I "o'\, <Jc, ":J ":J
LEGEND
+ MONITORING WELL LOCATlON
{349. 19} GROUNOWATER ELEVATlON
(FEET MSL}
NOTE-
BEAZER EAST, INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
UNIT STRUCTURES INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
INFERRED GRDUNDWATE,
CONTOUR
WELL PW/ IS THE GROUNDWATER
EXTRACTlON WELL FOR THE
GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL ACTlON
SCALE (FEET)
1-w -0 200 400
~
600
FLUOR DANIEL GTI
637 BRADDOCK AVENUE
EAST PITTSBURGH, PA 15112
PHONE: (412) 823-5300
FAX: (412) 824-7215
REV. NO.: DRAWING DATE: ACAD FILE:
1 6/10/96 96057103.DWG
ROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS
INTERMEDIATE/DEEP WELLS
26 MARCH 1996
CLIENT:
BEAZER EAST, INC.
LOCATION:
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
DESIGNED: DETAILED: PROJECT NO.:
C.W. R.A.M. 04003-0571
PM:
J.C.M.
PE/RG:
c.w.
FIGURE:
3
I
:1 <
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
•
0
D 0
0 D 0
0
0
= C:::J =
<:)
Q
0-•
CJ
0
q'1
CJ 'il
(/}
~
THIS DAAW\NG ,t,.NQ f,,N'i ATTACHMENTS ("DRAWINGs"). HAYE BEEN PRODUCED FOR TI-lE SOLE USE OF THE RECIPIENT
AND MUST NOT SE USED, REUSED, REPRODUCED, M001F!ED OR COPIED ("USE") IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT PRIOR
WRITTEN APPROVAL OF FLUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. THlS DRAWING MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION OF FLUOR DANIEL Gll, INC. At{'( UNAl.JTHORlZED USE OF THIS DRAWING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
ct ◊
0
CEMUERY
LEGEND
~ MONITORING WELL LOCATION
~ PENTACHLOROPHENOL CONCENTRATION
[:,_D {ug/L) -Sampled March 27 &-28, 1996
BEAZER EAST, INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
---------UNIT STRUCTURES INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
SCALE (FEET) ~--0 200 400
----z
600
5'
FLUOR DANIEL GT\
637 BRADDOCK AVENUE
EAST PITTSBURGH, PA 15112
PHONE: ( 412) 823-5300
FAX: (412) 824-7215
REV. NO.: DRAWING DATE: ACAD FILE:
1 7/15/96 96q 1 pn\a
PENTACHLOROPHENOL CONCENTRATIONS
SHALLOW WELLS
MARCH 27 & 28, 1996
CLIENT:
BEAZER EAST, INC.
LOCATION:
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
D_ESIGNED: DETAILED: PROJECT NO.:
C.W. KM 04003-0571
PM:
J.C.M.
PE/RG:
c.w.
FIGURE:
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
c=::J
C=:J =
C 0
D 0 \) 0
CJ
c?
f/J [C118]
~
~ 1C14B1 19
t::;
C D ✓1C;OB
1 2J ~
0
cc=!] [I 00 ~~o
0
0 0
THIS DRAWING ANO ANY ATTACHt.4ENTS (DRAWINGS"), HAVE BEEN PRODUCED FOR. THE SOLE USE OF THE RECIPIENT
ANO MUST NOT BE USED, REUSED, REPRODUCED, t.4001FIED OR COPIED \USE") IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT PRIOR
WRITTEN APPROVAL OF FLUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. THIS DRAWING MAY CONTAJN CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY
INF'QRMATION OF FLUOR DANIEL Gll, INC. ANY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THIS DRAWING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
LEGEND
~ MONITORING WELL LOCATION
IC15B] PENTACHLOROPHENOL CONCENTRATION
~ (ug/L) -Sampled March 27 & 28, 1996
BEAZER EAST, INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
---------UNIT STRUCTURES INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
NOTE:
WELL PWOI IS THE GROUNDWATER
EXTRACTION WELL FOR THE
GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL ACTION
SCALE (FEET)
p-..c_
0 200 400
~
600
FLUOR DANIEL GTI
637 BRADDOCK AVENUE
EAST PITTSBURGH, PA 15112
PHONE: ( 412) 823-5300
FAX: (412) 824-7215
REV. NO.: DRAWING DATE: ACAD FILE:
1 7/15/96 96q1pntb
PENTACHLOROPHENOL CONCENTRATIONS
INTERMEDIATE / DEEP WELLS
MARCH 27 & 28, 1996
CLIENT: PM:
BEAZER EAST, INC. J.C.M.
LOCATION: PE/RG:
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA c.w.
DESIGNED: DETAILED: PROJECT NO.: FIGURE:
C.W. KM 04003-0571 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
•
C
□ 0
C D
0
0
0
c:=::J
c::::::J =
\J
Q
THIS DRAWING AND ANY ATTACHMENTS (DRAWINGs"), HAVE BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE SOLE USE Of THE RECIPIENT
AND MUST NOT BE USED, REUSED, REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR COPIED (USE") IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT PRIOR
WRITTEN APPROVAL OF FLUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. THIS DRAWING MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL ANO PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF FLUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. A.NY UNAUTHORIZED USE OF Tl:'15 DRAWING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
1 0
0
LEGEND
~ MONITORING WELL LOCATION
~ 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL CONCENTRATION ~ (ug/L) -Sampled March 27 & 28, 1996
BEAZER EAST, INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
UNIT STRUCTURES INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
SCALE (FEET)
l""wr-
0 200 400 600
~
FLUOR DANIEL GTI
637 BRADDOCK AVENUE
EAST PITTSBURGH, PA 15112
PHONE: ( 412) B23-5300
FAX: (412) B24-7215
REV. NO.: DRAWING DATE: ACAD FILE:
1 7 /15/96 96q 12-4a
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL CONCENTRATIONS
SHALLOW WELLS
MARCH 27 & 28, 1996
CUENT: PM:
BEAZER EAST, INC. J.C.M.
LOCATION: PE/RG:
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA C.W.
DESIGNED: DETAILED: PROJECT NO.: FIGURE:
C.W. KM 04003-0571 6
I
ii
-i ii I !
I
I
:1
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
0
D 0
0 D
Q
D
c=
c:::::::J =
0 \)
Q
lb
LJ
THIS DRAWING ANO ANY ATTACHMENTS ("OAAWINGS"). HAVE BEEN PRODUCED FOR THE SOLE USE OF THE RECIPIENT
ANO MUST NOT BE USED, REUSED, REPRODUCED, MODIFIED OR COPIED ("USE") IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT PRIOR
WRITTEN APPROVAL OF FLUOR DANIEL GTl, INC. THIS DRAWING MAY CONTAIN CONFIOENTLAL AND PROPRIETARY
INFORMATION OF FLUOR DANIEL GTI, INC. AN"f UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THIS DRAWING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITTO.
ct
0
LEGEND
♦ MONITORING WELL LOCATION
[Cl58] 2,4-OICHLOROPHENOL CONCENTRATION
~ (ug/L) -Sampled March 27 & 28, !996
NOT£:
BEAZER EAST, INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
UNIT STRUCTURES INC.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
WELL PWO! IS THE GROUNDWATER
EXTRACTION WELL FOR TH£
GROUNDWATER REMEDIAL ACTION
SCALE (FEET)
ri--,r-
0 200 400
~
600
FLUOR DANIEL GTI
637 BRADDOCK AVENUE
EAST PITTSBURGH, PA 15112
PHONE: ( 412) 823-5300
FM: (412) 824-7215
REV. NO.: DRAWING DATE: ACAD FILE:
1 7/15/96 96q 12-4b
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL CONCENTRATIONS
INTERMEDIATE / DEEP WELLS
MARCH 27 & 28, 1996
CLIENT: PM:
BEAZER EAST, INC. J.C.M.
LOCATION: PE/RG:
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA C.W.
DESIGNED: DETAILED: PROJECT NO.: FIGURE:
C.W. KM 04003-0571 7
•
I
I APPENDIX A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I P:\Reports\Beazer\Momsvll\t0926.rpt
I FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
PLANT:
. 01orri<.u;l\e
PROJECT: &~:e . L.-;,;_, . , s+.:.~1.,
JOB#: OLJ 0030 C: 7 i
r
Site No. Date
M.-if 1..~17
C-I :1,p I ~'"7~
Time.
C..-2,A I-Z-2\l It: IS
C-2.7P. 3-2R 1~:~
C,.\ L/A 1~~25< IS:~
c-1412,1,...2',(. IU::(r'
n:11. C _; 15 P I ?,-2~
EG-0 1·--1~-ll• o~!.1.o
'.,:'.>. •?
:." ,·
'.i-:/;t'-'
Well.,.
dia.
(in.) ,
>Depih o(
,Well.(ft).
. (incl. stickup)
Depth to.
Water in
·_Well (ft)
',,,_ -iri;WA : l,Od
•·.I(;;; ; gd> >' · lJ .7 I
·_:•u t. ;1'\i=..: ...
)" . ',;'2Q .3;
(oi:::;. '1'3,
.\Cl9,1h
--.. ~ . .. . .
5,70
s.s~
. LJ;(;.Q
,~' I).
I; <i<7
14 //.Si
'(o9;'3/{
.. \ ).:,tt'
·, NDrr1ber ·~
. of:Gallon's';
'Removed. \~ ... -· . '
. ,... '-,t~' . ,, l·. ,,., .. : o(Ll. I .. _,·,Lt.,.;,
4o.~,· /L9·;i
;; ~. foe: : / <l ., =.'c:
,;q,,;q \~°f~L(
07; 8'l · ;'.) I: d ..
-·
<oifat>;;
Numbe(of,
:. Gallons ·c.
14
-
i~-,---=-· -· -~ GROUNDWATER .
CJDD TECHNOLOGY e -- -
PLANT:
{Yf orv' 1 s v:.1 \~ ./Jc..
PRoJEcT: {1 4 ,;rz {:;;-,~ , Sfv dy
·JOB#:. 0'-J0030 ~7,1 .:.o(
'·t '. •--. . ' .
Site No. Date -Time
c-:-re. !~-17 14:oti:'
C -9 '3 3-r ost:36
C -I I e Z-2~ 01, r::.t
c.-12.A 3-TJ -· '.'.....,
c. -1 bB -:z-28i og:w
c-10 A 7,-TJ
PW -:'-I --2,:..-2.-,
C-'29( 3-27
13~0
11:os
WelL'.,
:'dia.'
(in:)
;;/'
· Depth of.-
-. , ; Well (ft):
(incl. stickupj -
. _-_·.
l'OJiJ4
:r-;},LJI·
't:5~04
4::1; ;;)],
·: I 5,g, Cf.:)
·Depth to
Water in
Well (ft)
Depth of:
Water in'-;
Well (ft)_
;SAMPLERS
· 1s;g'}sturs) ·
. ' (, •·' _{\
STA. NO ..
c-o9 R
r -1) 9 12
C-l:::i A
c-01 S
Pw-o I
DA]j:. TIME
It-.. o7:f...o
IO:OD
Re!jnquished by: (Sii nature,1 •
{-.,. "" r\_ lA1· ~
Relinquished by: /S~1~alureJ
.Relinquished by: {Signature)
C G 0 R M. I -A .. .
-Date
:iz7,.,
Cate
Date
.. '
w E
t
)<
y,
X
V
x
Time:
Time_
STATION LOCATION.
!
Received for Laboratory_ by: (Signature)
.
•OJSTRIBUTION: Original accompanies shipment; Copy to Coordinator Fi81d File$.
25CJQ5AC
-.~\}( .~i_;::,-~ ,i,,:2,i \l.;v \),,.,~ ~.<?\, ·.,:\:;~,r,c-.,,_,~ii_) ... ,;e<~•:io~•-:~4~~••-.~~ ·•·1l~t~I~_:.?
a.. •~:· ·.-1:::{
-
•01STRIBUTION: Ortglnal accompanies shipment; Copy 10 Coordinator Field Flies.
25C395AC-.
L·
j ',, !··
'
·· <..:-;.27A
(-27 t
C IY A
C IY 6
C 13£>
C /06
. ?elinquished by: Signsturel
-I', ',l(Y /-~
Relinquished by: ,Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature)
.-•..•• -I-.
. Date };ime:· • 11 -2~-<;; '3~
Date Time,
• Date Time
•otSTRIBUTION: Original accompanies shipment; Copy to Coordinator FJ~id Al89.
25C395AC
I
D
m APPENDIX B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I P .\Reports\8eazer\Morrisvll\r0926. rpt
I FLUOR DANIEL GTI ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECRA
ENVIRONMENTAL
INC.
Chemical and Environmental Analysis Services
Ms. Mary Anna Babich
Groundwater Technology, Inc.
637 Braddock Avenue
East Pittsburgh, P.A. 15122
RE: Analytical Results
Dear Ms. Babich:.
June 20, 1996
Please find enclosed the revised data package results concerning the analyses of rlie samples
recently submitted by your firm. This report includes all raw and supporting data ,~gardin;~
these analyses:
Quote#: PA96-064
Matrix: Aqueous
Samples Received: 03/28,29/96
Sample Dates: 03/27,28/96
If you have any questions concerning this data, please contact me at (716) 691-2600 and refer
to the I. D. number listed below. It has been our pleasure to provide Groundwater Technoiogy.
Inc. with Environmental Testing Services. We look forward to serving you in the future.
Sincerely,
ONMENTAL, INC.
DJD/KEK/cjs
Enc:
ros
Program Manager .. dL
e a!-Kasperek I . La~or ory Manager
Aucunon Business Centre. 10 Hazeiwood Drive• Amnerst. New Yor'.-< i4228-2298 • /7:5i 691-2600
ID #A96-1276.R
#A96-1294.R
#NY6A6094
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
;I
'
:I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I t;) .• RECRA
I Ile ENVIRONMENTAL
INC.
000001
SAMPLE DATA SUMMARY PACK.AGE
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CASE NARRATIVE 0000oz
Laboratory Name: Recra Environmental, Inc.
Laboratory Code: RECNY
Contract Number: P A96-064
Sample Identifications: C-0IB
C-09B
C-09B MA TRIX SPIKE
C-09B MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE
C-IOA
C-IOB
C-llB
C-12A
C-13B
C-14A
C-14B
C-15B
C-200
C-27A
C-27B
C-28A
C-29B
M-04
PW-01
METHODOLOGY
The specific methodology employed in obtaining the enclosed analytical results are
indicated on the specific data tables. The method number presented refers to the following
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reference.
* "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods" (SW-846),
Third Edition, September 1994, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste.
COMMENTS
Comments pertain to data on one or all pages of this report.
The enclosed data has been reported utilizing data qualifiers (Q) as defined on the
Organic Data Comment Page.
RECRA
ENVIRONMENTAL
INC.
I
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
000003
METHOD 8270 DATA
The recovery of internal standard Acenaphthene-DlO fell outside the quality control
limits in both samples C-09B, C-09B Matrix Spike and C-09B Matrix Spike Duplicate.
The original analyses of sample C-14A showed several internal standards as being
non-compliant due to an elevated level of Pentachlorophenol. The re-analysis of the sample,
utilizing a dilution of one hundred, showed all internal standards as compliant. All surrogate
compounds were diluted out in the re-analysis.
The original analysis of sample C-0lB showed all internal standards as being outside
of the quality control limits. The re-analysis of this sample yielded non-compliant recoveries
for internal standards Chrysene-Dl2 and Perylene-Dl2.
The recoveries of internal standards Chrysene~Dl2, Perylene-Dl2, and surrogate
2,4,6-Tribromophenol fell outside of the quality control limits in sample C-l0B. This
sample was re-analyzed and yielded similar results indicating i..Titerference from the sample
matrix.
Sample EB-01 was lost during the extraction procedure. There was insufficient
sample volume remaining to perform a re-extraction.
"I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terrns and conditions of the
contract both technically and for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed
above. Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package has been
authorized by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified by the following
signature."
RECRA
ENVIRONMENTAL
INC.
ek
ory anager ..___--'-<:::...--
Date · '
I
n
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ORGANIC DATA COMMENT PAGE
000004
Laboratory Name RECRA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
USEPA Defined Organic Data Qualifiers:
U -Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected.
J -
C -
B -
E -
D -
G -
L -
T -
N -
Indicates an estimate value. This flag is used either when estimating a
concentration for tentatively identified compounds where a 1: l response is
assumed, or when the mass spectral data indicate the presence of a compound
that meets the identification criteria but the result is less than the sample
quantitation limit but greater than zero.
This flag applies to pesticide results where the identification has been
confirmed by GC/MS.
This flag is used when the analyte is found in the associated blank as well as
in the sample.
This flag identifies compounds whose concentrations exceed the calibration
range of the GC/MS instrument for that specific analysis.
This flag identifies all compounds identified in an analysis at a secondarJ
dilution factor.
The TCLP Matrix Spike recovery was greater than the upper limit of the
analytical method.
The TCLP Matrix Spike recovery was lower than the lower limit of the
analytical method.
This flag is used when the analyte is found in the associated TCLP extraction
blank as well as in the sample.
Indicates presumptive evidence of a compound. This flag is only used for
tentatively identified compounds, where the identification is based on a mass
spectral library search. It is applied to all TIC results.
P -This flag is used for a pesticide/ Aroclor target analyte when there is greater
than 25 % difference for detected concentrations between the two GC columns.
The lower of the two values is reported on Form I and flagged with a "P"'.
A -This flag indicates that a TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation product.
RECRA
ENVIRONMENTAL
INC.
I
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Client No.
0 Lab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
IC-OlB
E Lab Code : RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water)
I Sample wt/vol:
I
Level: (low/med)
% Moisture:
WATER
1000.0 (g/mL) !'11,
LOW
decanted: (Y/N) N
.Concentrated Extract Volume: l000(uL)
Injection Volume: l.00(uL)
IGPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: -1.,_Q
I CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6127606
Lab File ID: Ul802.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/27/96
Date Extracted: 04/03/96
Date Analyzed: 04(10/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.2
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/28/96
Q
u
u
GROUNDWAT.t;K Tt:.L:.tti'-U.L.,U\,,,,::r .l .l..l.'H ....
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
000006 I
I
Client No.
Lab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
lc-01B RE
llab Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
rat.rix: · (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol:
WATER Lab Sample ID: A6127606RI
1000.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: Ul821.MSO
tevel: (low/med) LOW Date Samp/Recv: 03/27/96
% Moisture:___ decanted: (Y/N) li Date Extracted: 04/03/96
lconcentrated Extract Volume: l000(uL) Date Analyzed: 04/13/96
•
Injection Vol~me:
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) li
1. 00 (uL) Dilution Factor: 1.00
pH: _L_Q
I CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I 120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol 0.2
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/28/96
Q
u
u
GRUUNlJWATJ:;l<. TJ:;L:li.£<ULU-, l .1.m_
BEAZER --MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 --SEMI--VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
000007
I
I
Client No.
Lab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
IC--09B
OLab Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C--01B
1 Matrix: {soil/water)
Sample wt/vol:
WATER
1000.0 {g/mL) ML
I Level: {low/med) Mm
% Moisture: decanted: {Y/N) H
I Concentrated Extract Volume: l000{uL)
Injection Volume: l.00{uL)
I GPC Cleanup: {Y/N) N pH: ....1.,__Q
I CAS NO. COMPOUND
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
120--83--2------------2,4--Dichlorophenol
87--86--5--------------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6127603
Lab File ID: Ul797.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/27/96
Date Extracted: 04/03(96
Date Analyzed: 04/10(96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
{ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.2
1
FORM I --GC/MS BNA
I
03/28/96
Q
u
u
GKU UJ."11 LJ~ n .L .C.l"f.. J. .c.1.....n..1." v.uvu .1. .i. •, '-
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
000008 I
I
Client No.
Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
ic-lOA
Lab
OLab Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
!Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol:
I Level: (low/med)
% Moisture:
WATER
1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW
decanted: (Y/Nl N
I concentrated Extract Volume: l000(uL)
Injection Volume: l.00(uL)
I GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: -1..,_Q
I CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2:-----2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6127605
Lab File ID: U1822.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/27/96
Date Extracted: 04/03/96
Date Analyzed: 04 /13 /96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.2
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/28/96
Q
u
u
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
000009 I
I
Client No.
Lab Name: .Recra Environmental Contract:
\c-lOB
lab Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
.ratrix: (soil/water)
~ample wt/vol:
tevel: (low/med)
% Moisture:
WATER
1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW
decanted: (Y/N) N
lconcentrat,ed Extract Volume: 1000 (uL)
(
Injection •Volume:
PC Cleanup: (Y/N) N
1.00(uL)
pH: ...2,_Q
I CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6129411
Lab File ID: U1816.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/28(96
Date Extracted: 04(04/96
Date Analyzed: 04(13(96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.2
2 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/29/96
Q
u
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
000010 I
I
··Client No.
IJ'ab
flab
Name: Recra Environmental
Code: RECNY Case No.:
Contract:
SAS No.:
IC-lOB RE
SDG No.: C-0lB
ratrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol:
WATER Lab Sample ID: A6129411RI
IJr,evel: (low/med)
% Moisture:
lconcentrated Extract
1000.0 (g/mL) ML
Mlli
decanted: (Y/N) N
Volume: l000(uL)
1.00(uL) .Injection: Volume:
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: __L._Q
I CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab File ID: U1818.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/28/96
Date Extracted: 04 /04 /96
Date Analyzed: 04/13/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.4
2 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I -GC/MS ENA
03(29/96
Q
I INC GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE,
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
NC 000011,
ORGANICS
Client No.
Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
IC-llB
uLab Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
!sample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW Level: (low/med)
I% Moistur~: decanted: (Y/N) N
.Concentrated Extract Volume: l000(uL)
Injection Volume: l.00(uL)
IGPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: -1..,_.Q
I CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2°-----2,4-Dichlorophenol
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6127601
Lab File ID: Ul795.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/27/96
Date Extracted: 04/03/96
Date Analyzed: 04/10/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.2
29
•• FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/28/96
Q
u
I GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE,
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
INC
NC
ORGANICS 000012
Client No.
Name:' Recra Environmental Contract:
IC-12A
Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
!sample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) !'11!
LOW Level: (low/med)
1% Moisture: decanted: (Y/Nl N
I Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 (uL)
Injection Volume: l.00(uL)
I GPC Cleanup: (Y/Nl N pH: _L_Q
I CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6127604
Lab File ID: UlB00.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/27/96
Date Extracted: 04/03/96
Date Analyzed: 04/10/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.2
1
I
I FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/28/96
Q
u
u
I
I
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
000013
Client No.
ULab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
IC-13B
u Lab Code : RECNY Case No. : SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
m Sample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW Level: (low/med) I% Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) N
I Co~cen~rated Extract Volume: l000(uL)
InJection Volume: l.00(uL)
I GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: -1..,_Q
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2-----s2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6129410
Lab File ID: Ul817.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/28/96
Date Extracted: 04/04/96
Date Analyzed: 04/13/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.2
1
I FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/29/96
Q
u
u
I
I
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
000014
Client No.
I Lab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
IC-14A
u Lab Code : RECNY Case No. : SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
m Sample wt/vol:
Level: (low/med)
I % Moisture:
1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW
decanted: (Y/N) N
I Concentra.ted Extract Volume: 1000 (uL)
Injection Volume: 1.00(uL)
I GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: __L_Q
CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6129408
Lab File ID: U1810.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/28(96
Date Extracted: 04(04(96
Date Analyzed: 04/10(96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.2
5200
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/29(96
Q
E
I
I
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
00001.S
Client No.
lab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
IC-14A DL
tab Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
lsample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW Level: (low/med)
I% Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) N
.Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 (uL)
Injection Volume: l.00(uL)
IGPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: -2.,_Q
I CAS NO. COMPOUND
I
I
I
I
I
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6129408DL
Lab File ID: Ul823.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/28/96 03/29/96
Date Extracted: 04/04/96
Date Analyzed: 04/13/96
Dilution Factor: 100.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
10
3500
Q
u
I
I
I FORM I -GC/MS BNA
I GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE,
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
-.
INC
NC 000016
ORGANICS I Client No.
U Lab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
Case No.: 0 Lab Code : RECNY
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER u Sample wt/vol:
Level: (low/med)
1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW
SAS No.:
• % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N) N
I
Concentrated Extract Volume: l000(uL)
Injection Volume: 1.00(uL)
(Y/N) N pH: -2.,.Q
lc-14B
SDG No.: C-0lB
Lab Sample ID: A6129409
Lab File ID: UlBll.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/2B/96
Date Extracted: 04/04/96
Date Analyzed: 04/10/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
I GPC Cleanup:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
120-B3-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol 0.2
B7-B6-5-------Pentachlorophenol 19
FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/29/96
Q
u
I
I
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
000017
Client No.
I Lab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
jc-lSB
ILab Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: A6129401
Osample wt/vol: 1000. o (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: U1820.MSO
II Level: (low/med)
II% Moisture:
!&lli
decanted: (Y/N) N
Date Samp/Recv: 03/28/96
Date Extracted: 04/04/96
.Concentrated Extract Volume: l000(uL) Date Analyzed: 04(13/96
Injection Volume: 1.00(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.00
IGPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:~
CONCENTRATION UNITS: I CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol 0.2
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol 1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/29/96
Q
u
u
I
I
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA. SHEET
000018
Client No.
Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
IC-27A
tab Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: A6129406
Osample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: Ul808.MSO
Level: (low/med)
D% Moisture:
LOW
decanted: (Y/N) N
Date Samp/Recv: 03/28/96
Date Extracted: 04 /04 /96
I Concentrated Extract Volume: 1000 (uL) Date Analyzed: 04/10/96
Injection Volume: l.00(uL) Dilution Factor: 1.00
IGPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: _L.Q.
CONCENTRATION UNITS: I CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
120-83-2~-----2,4-Dichlorophenol 0.2
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/29/96
Q
u
u
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
-·.
000019 I
I Client No.
Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
jc-27B
I Lab Code: RECNY Case No. : SAS No.:. __ _ SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water)
Osample wt/vol:
Level: (low/med)
WATER
1000.0
LOW
(g/mL) ML
m % Moisture: decanted: (Y/N)
1 Concentrated Extract
Injection Volume: __ .,_,_=
Volume:
1. 00 (uL)
l000(uL)
I GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: _L.Q
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
!:!
Lab Sample ID: A6129407
Lab File ID: U1809.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/28/96
Date Extracted: 04/04/96
Date Analyzed: 04/10/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.2
2
I
I FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/29/96
Q
u
I
I
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
-.
000020
Client No.
ILab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
Jc-28A
g Lab Code : RECNY Case No. : SAS No.: SDG No.: C-01B
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: A6129402
Osample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: U1819.MSO
Level: (low/med)
m % Moisture:
LOW
decanted: (Y/N) N
Date Samp/Recv: 03/28/96
Date Extracted: 04/04/96
.Concentrated Extract Volume: l000(uL)
Injection Volume: 1.00(uL)
Date Analyzed: 04/13/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
I GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: __L_Q
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol 0.2
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I FORM I -GC/MS ENA
03/29/96
Q
u
u
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI~VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET ·
000021 I
I Client No.
I Lab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
IC-29B
I Lab ~ode: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER o Sample wt/vol:
Level: (low/med)
U % Moisture:
Concentrated Extract
I Injection Volume:
1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW
decanted: (Y/N) N
Volume:. 1000 (uL)
1. 00 (uL)
I GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) li pH: __L_Q.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6129404
Lab File ID: U1805.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/27/96
Date Extracted: 04/03/96
Date Analyzed: 04/10/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.3
1
I FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/29/96
Q
u
I
I
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC 000022
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Client No.
Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
jc-200
• Lab Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
I Sample wt/vol:
Level: (low/med)
D % Moisture:
1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW
decanted: (Y/N) N
m Concentrated Extract Volume: l000(uL)
Injection Volume: l.00(uL)
I GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH : ___L_Q
CAS NO. COMPOUND
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6127602
Lab File ID: Ul796.MSQ
Date Samp/Recv: 03/27/96
Date Extracted: 04/03/96
Date Analyzed: 04/10/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
0.2
26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/28/96
Q
u
I GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE,
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
INC
NC
ORGANICS
000023
I
lab
Client No.
Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
Case No.: ltab Code: RECNY
Matrix: (soil/water)
Osample wt/vol:
Level: (low/med)
WATER
1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW
SAS No.:
0% M6isture: decanted: (Y/N) N
IConcentrated Extract Volume: l000(uL)
Injection Volume: 1.00(uL)
IGPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: ...:J...,Jl
SDG No.: C-0lB
Lab Sample ID: A6129403
Lab File ID: U1804.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/27/96
Date Extracted: 04/03/96
Date Analyzed: 04/10/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L I CAS NO.
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol 0.2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol 10
FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/29/96
Q
u
-.
I
I
GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY INC
BEAZER -MORRISVILLE, NC
METHOD 8270 -SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
000024
Client No.
I Lab Name: Recra Environmental Contract:
• Lab Code: RECNY Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: C-0lB
Matrix: (soil/water)
D Sample wt/vol:
Level: (low/med)
D % Moisture:
WATER
1000.0 (g/mL) ML
LOW
decanted: (Y/N) li
.Concentrated Extract Volume: l000(uL)
Injection Volume: l.00(uL)
I GPC Cleanup: (Y/Nl li pH:~
I CAS NO. COMPOUND
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
120-83-2------2,4-Dichlorophenol
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol
Lab Sample ID: A6127607
Lab File ID: Ul803.MSO
Date Samp/Recv: 03/27/96
Date Extracted: 04/03/96
Date Analyzed: 04/10/96
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L .
0.4
29
I
I FORM I -GC/MS BNA
03/28/96
Q