The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNCD003200383_19870527_Koppers Co. Inc._SERB PA SI_Site Inspection Report - Part II (References)-OCRKEYSTONE ['.\\'lROS~tESTAL Rl-::SOLRC[S, 1:--,:c. ''•~----------------------------------------,. I I I I I II I I I a I I I 436 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1940, Pinsburgh. PA 15219 CERTIFIED l'iAIL-RETURII RECEIPT REQUESTED Dear l·lr. Berry: ) January 6, 1937 State of llorth Carolina Dept. of llatural Resources and · Comr.1unity Development 3800 Barrett Drive P.O. 8ox 27687 Raleigh, llorth Carolina 27611-7637 ATTEIITION: MR. E.L. BERRY SUBJECT: Jionitori ng ·Well Construction P.ermit '9l-0255°v/llc0236 r· On October 27, 1986, your office issued the above-referenced permit to Koppers Co., Inc. for construction of monitoring wells at our facility in \•!ake County, 1/orth Carolina. These 1·1ells t·1ere constructed by Wilson Engineering Associates under the supervision of Steven A. Colton. '. huve cnclc~-ed the foll01·1ing infornation <:oncerning these 11ells: o Well Construction Records (using Form GW-1). o \·!e 11 Boring Logs. o Analytical results of soil and groundwater samples. If you have any questions on this subject, please contact me at this office. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. 1-ii1S/bj Enclosure cc: J. R. Campbell S. Colton C. Cramer 1·1/0 attachments Sincerely yours, ilartin IL Schlesinger Assistant Pro9ram 11anager Previously Operated Properties i ' I I KEYSTONE EN\'IRONMENTAL RF.SOURCES, INC. Ref. 8 , Encl. 1 , I 440 College Park Dr., Monroe,ille, PA 15146 ---------------- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ,I II i.1 ~ I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ANO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL /v4.ANAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION P.O. BOX 27687 -RALEIGH,N.C. 27611, PHONE (919) 733-5083 FOR OFFICE USE ONL y Quad. No. _______ Serial No. ___ _ I . WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD IDRILLING CONTRACTOR W,/so" [.,,311,e~r, ... ) Assoc,~tes rRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER __ .:c.g..::.~-1-'------ 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) I Nearest Town: JVlo,-r,sv,lf~) ;V C. Ko ooers Roa.cl, Mar,.,s v,lk. (Road.Community, or S~bdivision and Lot No.} I. owNER /'(oppers Co . .r ... c.. ADDRESS tn3ineereJ WoqJ S,,sfe;,,,S,R,t:.5'f ,M Il g (Street or Ro~te No.) ' _orr,sv1 c. ;v.c I City pr Town State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED 'R/J/P6 usE OF WELL Monitor,~., I TOTAL DEPTH 25" CUTTINGS COLLECTED @°Yes □ No . DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes [i;YNo 6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: /3.30 FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING o t.Ybelow · I TOP OF CASING IS /. 0 FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE . ... YIELD (gpm): ______ METHOD OF TEST _______ _ 8 WATER ZONES (deoth): ----------------- 9. CHLORINATION: Type Amount .I CASING: From I From From Depth ____ To 0 Diameter Wall Thickness or Weight/Ft. 2" FL-'=--- ____ To ___ Ff. ___ _ ----TO---FL---- Material PVC I. GROUT: Depth Material Method From _o __ To_2 __ FL Ce..,.,ent -t-6enfon,te Powder I From _2..=-_ To 't FL Seo.I -Be~tor1e. Pel/efs .•. SCREEN: I Depth Diameter Slot Size Material· From_5=-_To 25° Ft. 2 in.0.010 in. PVC FrJm ____ To ___ Ft. ____ in. ___ in. l From To ___ Ft. ____ in. ___ in. ! , . GRAVEL PACK: II Depth Size 'f To 2 S-Ft. -~6~'-' __ From Material 50.,..J. From ____ To ___ . Ft. _____ _ Lat. _______ long. ____ Pc __ Minor Basin ____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: 'II -02.~5"-w'M-02.3b County: Wc.,,Ke Depth DRILLING LOG From To Formation Descriotion If adCitional space is needed use back of :crm. LOCATION SKETCH (Show direc!ion and distance from at least two State Roads, or other map reference points) See = 1· REMARKS:------------------------------------------- 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD H EEN PRO.)llDED?,) Jj,_fWELL OWNER. U. (~ 12 23 26 SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DA TE GW· 1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division al Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I MONITORING WELL LOG PROJECT Ralkigh, NC WELL NO. MW-1 I S. A. Colton DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger GEOLOGIST I ---- DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 8/7/86 I GROUND ELEVAl\ION TOP OF WELL.---'------ DEPTH OF WELL\ (ft) GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): AT COMPLETION ----- AFTER HOURS I CASING MATERitL 2" PVC SCREEN 20' of 0.010" slots STRAT SAMPLE I DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION Brown, clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr weathered rock fragments, tr m quartz fragments, tr roots (0-1.5') Mottled Brown and gray silty CLAY, tr f sand, tr f rock fragments. I Red/brown Clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr kiltstone fragments, tr f sand I I Bottom of Boring -26.5 feet I I I GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE ':'!."':.\ ~ :..1, · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCTION ... : ·.•·: ... . ' ... ',' '' : .: •',. SHEET OF ·•,· ,•,• ------ I I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF N~ nJRAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MA.NAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION I P.O. BOX 27667 -AALEIGf'-N.C. 27611, PHONE (919) 733-5063 r------------,~ FOR OFFICE USE ONL y Quad. No. _______ Serial No. ___ _ I WELL CON~TRUCTION RECORD lRILLING CONTRACTOR \.v; )So" [ .-iB I neet,n) A 5S o, I ~te S 'RILLER REGISTRATION NU~BER __ _::g..:.~:_I..:._ ____ _ 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch t the location below) I Nearest Town: ;V\o.-r1s v,ift:) JV C. /:iopners R.oa.d., /Vlorhsv,lk. (Road, Community, or S~bdivision land Lot No.) I OWNER /'(oppers Co. Xnc., ADDRESS f: ri31neere.t. W'oqJ 5vsfe.M s. R,t. 5'f /1/1 //" (Street or R~te No.) ✓ . ~orr,sv, c. I !:!:...C. ' City or/ Town I State Zip Code DATE DRILLED sh, U, USE OF WELL Mon;tor,~:1 rt I ;;t I TOTAL DEPTH 2'f:. 5 CUTTINGS COLLECTED @'Yes □ No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING 0ELL? 0 Yes G2"No 6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: ,,;.oo I FT. □ above TOP OF CASING, I ul'below ' TOP OF CASING IS ~2,..__-; 1 -FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE. YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST i WATER ZONES (deoth); ---~\ ____________ _ 9. CHLORINATION: Tyoe ___ .,.I __ I CASING: From I From From I GROUT: From Depth ~Q~_To s- Amount Diameter --, JI Wall Thickness or Weight/Ft. ]'-..... =--- ----TO ---~'---- ----TO Fl.---- Material p Ve: Depth Material Method I From "'· SCREEN: 0 To__;_2._F!'-Ce,-.,enT <t-Behfon,te Powder 2 To 'f Ft. Seo.I -Geat.,ite. Pellet's _I Depth From _~ __ To 2 If- Diameter Ft. 2 I Slot Size Material in.0.010 in. PVC. FrJm ____ To ___ Ft. ____ in. ___ in. __ _ I From ____ To ___ FJ. ____ in. ___ in. __ _ I ~-GRAVEL PACK: I Depth ! Size u. -1 From / To 21f;5 Ft. __ ..>e6c...'_' __ -~--I Material So.,-,d. From ____ To ___ Ft. _____ _ Lat. Long. ____ Pc __ Minor Basin ____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: ~l-02.SS--\./'M-023!, County: Depth From Jdc...Ke To DRILLING LOG Formation Description If additional space is needed use back of form. LOCATION SKETCH (Show direction and distance lrom at least two State Roads, or other mao reference points) 5ee s,te I. REMARKS: I I . I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CO~ST UCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARD_S, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HA PROVJCJ'D TP°JT\;'f, \\'ELL OWNER. / / I c:: u. ~~ IL; 23!..Jt SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT 'DA TE I GW-1 Revised I 1 /84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to we11 owner. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Ri{ieigh, NC WELL NO. MW-2 I DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton I -----'-----DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 8/7 /86 I GROUND ELEVATION __ _ TOP OF WELL_--'-\ ____ _ GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): DEPTH OF WELLl (ft) I CASING MATERI¼L I AT COMPLETION ----- AFTER HOURS 2" PVC SCREEN 19' of 0.010" slots DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr siltstone fragments, roots 0-1.5', 9-10.5' Mottled gray /green/yellow /orange clayey SILT, (weathered bedrock) Bottom of Boring -26.5 feet GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ----- CONSTRUCT! ON ·.·.· .:. ':, SHEET ___ OF __ _ I . I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NA1TURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION I FOR OFFICE USE ONL y P.O. BOX 27687 -RAl..ElG~,N.C. 27611, PHONE {911il) 733-5083 I I WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD '°RILLING CONTRACTOR N )So" ["'BI ,,eef,r,) Ass QC/~ te s 'RILLER REGISTRATION NU~BER __ .:..g-"'-~-f _____ _ I . 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch ol the localion below) I Nearest Town: MO r-r15 v,ift.) ,N'. C. fio oaer• P-.oa.d.. Morh s v,l/e (Road~ Community, or S~bdivision land Lot No.) lowNER K:oppers Co. X"c.. ADDRESS [ r,~11,ePreJ Wood S,,steM s, (<t. 5'f ,1;1 //; (Street or Ro~te No.) ' L!'.!.0 rr,sv• -. I !'!:._C. I I State Zip Code 3 DA TE DRILLED // 'i6 USE OF WELL /Vl On ;tor I "J I TOTAL DEPTH /5', ' cutTINGS COLLECTED @°Yes □ No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? □ Yes [id"No 6. STATIC WA TEA LEVEL: 7. 'Fr I FT. D ,above TOP OF CASING, -, I [i3""below ·I TOP OF CASING Is ---=.,_,"---'-i-FT. ABOVc cAND SURFACE . ., YIELD (gpm): METHOD OF TEST --------'-- ' I WATER ZONES (dep1hl: ---~1------------- 9. CHLORINATION: Type Amount CASING: I Depth Diameter Wall Thickness or Weight/Ft. Material From 0 I From ,-t;" 2" -"'----To ~-r·-=--- ----To ___ 11 ___ _ PVC. From ----To ---FL---- II GROUT: II Depth Material Method From -~0 __ To /. ~ I From ~-SCREEN: /. ~ To 5, ~ F( (e;viei,t ,t-/3e1-ito",te P.wder Ft Seo.I -Be~t"iie. Pellet's I From Depth Diameter Slot Size Material 15': 5'" I 2 in.0.0I0 PVC. To F,t. in. Fr.:,m ___ _ To Ft. in. in. I From ___ _ '-3. GRAVEL PACK: To Ft. in. in. I I I Depth ! Size From 3, 5" To ft;'_ r Ft. 6 If i--"---- Material So...,J. From ____ To ___ Ft.~----- Ouad. No. _______ Serial No. ___ _ Lat. _______ Long. ____ Pc- Minor Basin ____________ _ Basin Code~------------ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.--- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: '11 -02.55""-l.'A-0l3!, County: VVc:.)f e Depth DRILLING LOG From To Formation Description If additional space is needed use back at form. LOCATION SKETCH (Show direction and distance from at !east two State Roads, or ·other map reference points) see .s,-fp v,,«p 1· REMARKS: \ I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONST CTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH tS NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION ST ANDAROS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS ROVIDU. TO LL OWNER. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT R GW· t Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I I i I I I I I i:I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I i MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT_..:..Ral=e::::Jigo..:h.:i..,..:..N:...::C,.___ ____________ _ WELL NO. MW-3 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton I DRILLING METHOD _ _:_:H:.::oll:c:o=-w"--=S..:.te::cm;:.:_:_A:..:ug=er'----- DRILLER Soil TestingServices DATE GROUND ELEVATION. ___ _ GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL ____ _ AT COMPLETION ----- DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 10' of 0.010" slots 8/11/86 GRAVEL PACK :~•.;.•:· BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION Yellow/brown SILT, tr f sand, tr frock fragments, roots Brown/red to gray/purple clayey SILT, tr f sand Gray/purple to brown clayey SILT, (weathered bedrock), tr f sand Bottom of Boring -21.5 feet SHEET OF ------ I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ANO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONL y P.O. BOX 27687 -AALEIGH.N.C. 27611, PHONE (919) 733-5083 I WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD -RILLING CONTRACTOR NI So" [ ,;i« 1 rieer,") A 5S Qc ,~ 1e S 'RILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER _.,_c..g~~-I _____ _ 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch al the location below) I Nearest Town: ;V'\o.--r,s,v,llt) ;t,'. C. Ko one rs Roa.cl, Ma{f1 ! v,lk. (Road.Community, or S~bdivision and Lot No.) I OWNER ___,_,K"'-'o+f-1-f...:.ec..r=-s _C=-=o"--. _X_n_c._,_ ______ _ ADDRESS t ri3me•reJ. \A/99J S;,sfe.M s. R,t:. 5'f All lie (Street or ~OJte No.l ' ~orr,sv1 t-!:...C. State Zip Code I City pr Tlwn 3. DATE DRILLED ?/''ft6 USE OF WELL /'.1/onil'or,~., I TOTAL DEPTH /'If. r;. CUTTINGS COLLECTED G'.i"Yes □ No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes W"No 6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: 9.40 FT. Q,above TOP OF CASING, 2 IXl below I TOP OF CASING IS_cc.c. ___ FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE. ,. YIELD (gpm): ______ METHOD OF TEST •'WATER ZONES (depth):----------------- 9. CHLORINATION: Type Amount I CASING: Depth Wall Thickness Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material I 0 From -~--To From. ____ To ___ Ft. ___ _ 2" Ft. --'=---fVC From To Fl.---- Depth Material Method I GROUT: From ~o~_ To_l_c.__Ft. (er,,eht -1-Behton,te P.whr I From ~2~_Ta_'+'--_Ft. Seo.I -Bento»ite. Pe/(efs ~-SCREEN: I Depth From s-To /7 Slot Size Material ~~-Ft.~2~_in.O.O/O in, PVC Diameter Fr.:>m To Ft. ____ in. ___ in. From To ___ Ft, ____ in. ___ in. GRAVEL PACK: Depth Size Material From lf-To /8,,!;-Ft. __ 6,,__11 __ Sa.nd. From ____ To ___ Ft. _____ _ Quad. No. _______ Serial No. ___ _ Lat. Long, ____ Pc __ Minor Basin ____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: 'll-02.5S--1.',.._-023!, County: Depth From To DRILLING LOG Formation Description ___ ___,Se=e o;H:c,,_ l he cl. , heet" If adCitional space is needed use back of !urm. LOCATION SKETCH /'I\,/-'f {Sh.ow direction and distance from at least two State Roads, or other map reference points) 1· REMARKS: ·. I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARD_S, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD ~ROC!°ED ~WELL OWNER. I 1./2.J/J b I SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT . I DA TE ·Gw-1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division ol Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I .1 I I I MONITORING'WELL LOG PROJECT __ R_al_e_,ig"-h-'-,_N_C'----------------WELL NO, MW-4 DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 8/14/86 GROUND ELEVATION __ _ GROUND WATER DEPTH {ft): TOP OF WELL ____ _ AT COMPLETION. ____ _ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 211 PVC SCREEN 12' of 0.01011 slots DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, roots Brown silty CLAY, tr f sand Yellow/brown to brown clayey SILT, tr to little emf sand Red/brown to purple/maroon clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand GRAVEL PACK :~•.;.•:' BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCTION Purple/maroon clayey SILT and SAND (weathered bedrock) Bottom of Boring -24 feet SHEET ___ OF __ _ I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ANO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION P.O. BOX 27687 -RALEIGH,N.C. 27611, PHONE (919) 733-5083 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Ouad. No. _______ Serial No. I WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD lRILUNG CONTRACTOR w, ls0" [ "'B, nee,.,.,,) A 5S oc ,~ ie s 'RILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER --=-g--=-~-1-'------- 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch ol the location below) I Nearest Town: ;V\of"ri5 V11ft.) fa'. C. Koppers R.oa.cJ.1 /1/lor,.,s v,!k, (Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.) I owNER K'oppers Co . .r.,,c._ ADDRESS f: ri3ineere.t. WoqJ SvsteM s. R.t:. 5'f ,1,1 /Je_ (Slreet or R9yte No.) ~orr,sv, ;v. c: I Cito:,' ]"o't" State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED -~a+L'-'---"~b __ USE OF WELL l'llonitor,~., I TOTAL DEPTH 25-~' CUTTINGS COLLECTED Gives O No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? □ Yes w"No 6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: 8. 0':) FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING. ' 2 l,l'below TOP OF CASING IS-. __ ._ .. ,-FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE . . YIELD (gpm): .. METHOD OF TEST _______ _ I WATER ZONES (dep1h): ----------------- 9. CHLORINATION: Type I CASING: Depth From 0 To ~ I From To From To B GROUT: From Depth 0 To I (I From ___ _ ~-SCREEN: To 3 I Depth From s-To 2.~ FrJm To From To GRAVEL PA CK: Depth l I From 3 To 25"° From To REMARKS: Amount Wall Thickness Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material FI. 2" f'VC Fl. Ft. Material ' Method Fl. Cer-ie1it v-6ei,,fon,te Powder Fl. Seo.I -(3e"tonite. Pe /let Diameter Slot Size Material FI. 2 in. 0. 010 in. eve. Fi. in. in. Ft. in. in. Size Material FI. 6 If s 0,. r, cl.. Ft. ----Lat. Long. ____ Pc __ Minor Basin _____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: '/I -02.55""-WM• 0231, County: Jdc...Ke Depth DRILLING LOG From To Formation Description ---~S""'e'-"e c,Jf., c /.,e ci s hee t II additional space is needed use back of form. LOCATION SKETQH (Sh_ow direction and distance from at least two State Roads, or other map relerence points) see srfe /'>'lC..p I I I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C. WELL CO STRUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HA~ PROVIDED TO WELL OWNER. ~ a. ,1. 23 i SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE GW· 1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I I I I I I I I ·• I I I I I I ;I ' I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger WELL NO. MW-5 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 8/1/86 GROUND ELEVATION. ___ _ GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL ____ _ AT COMPLETION ----- DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 20' of 0.010" slots 10 DESCRIPTION Brown cla e SILT. tr f sand tr frock fra ments FILL Light Brown SILT, tr f sand (FILL) Brown to maroon/purple clayey SILT, tr f sand, .J.<:::-..::::S.l-tr light brown silt laminae Bottom of Boring -2_6,5 feet GRAVEL PACK :~•-:.•:· BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ----- CONSTRUCTION · .. .. ·. SHEET OF ------ I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NA nJRAl RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROONOWATEFI SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONL y P.O. BOX 27887 -RALEIGH,N.C. 27811, PHONE (919) 733-5083 I WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD 'RILLING CONTRACTOR 'Mlso" r,,.,,,neer, ... ) Asso,,~tes· 'RILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER __ :=.g..:.~c_l__:__ ____ _ 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch ol the location below) I Nearest Town: ;V\of"r,sv,lfr.) ;V C. Koppers P-.oo.c/..: Mor,..,s v,lk, (Road. Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.) I OWNER I'( Q ppers Co. .r nc.. ADDRESS [ n3lneeteJ. W99J S,,steri S, R.t:. 5't ,1,1 //" (Street or Ro~te No.) ' L.'.'...!orr,sv, c. ;v.c. I City lr Tor,n State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED ?~2.~{?(, USE OF WELL ///Qnitor1nJ I TOTAL DEPTH 2. 'i/' _ CUTTINGS COLLECTED @°Yes O No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes Ci6No 6. STA TIC WATER LEVEL: Cf_ 'i/9 FT O above TOP OF CASING 2 · Gtbelow ' Ii TOP OF CASING IS -'---FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE. "YIELD (gpm): ______ METHOD OF TEST I WA TEA ZONES (depth): 9. CHLORINATION: I CASING: From 0 I From From I GROUT: From 0 I From Lf SCREEN: I From 8. Fr .:im I From . GRAVEL PACK: I From & From Type Depth Amount Diameter Wall Thickness or Weight/Ft. Material To g 2" -'"--Ft.-'=---PVC. To ___ Ft. ___ _ To ---Fl.---- Depth Material Method To 4-Ft. (e;,,e,.,t ~ /3e,.,fon,te P.wder To 6 Ft. Seo.I -Ge~to.,ite. Pelle~ Depth Diameter Sloi Size Material To 2~ Ft. 2 in. 0. 010 in. eve To Ft. in. in. To Ft. in . in. Depth Size Material To 2°l? Ft, 61/ So.-,.,J.. To Ft. Quad. No. _______ Serial No. ___ _ lat. Long. ____ Pc __ Minor Basin ____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: '/l-02.SS"-w'M-023!, County: Depth From To DRILLING LOG Formation Oescricfion JI additional space is needed use back ol fc,rm. LOCATION SKETCH (Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads, or oth8r map reference points) I REMARKS:---------------------------------------------- 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION ST ANDARD_S, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD ~ROQDED ~ WELL OWNER. t 2./z ] /J' 6 I SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DA TE GW· l Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger WELL NO. MW-6 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 7 /28/86 GROUND ELEVATION ___ _ GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL ------AT COMPLETION ____ _ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 17' of 0.010" slots DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr fm rock fragments Brown CLAY and SILT, tr f sand Red/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, some gray/green silty CLAY ockets Maroon clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand Gray/green to gray/brown SILT and CLAY, tr f sand Gray/Brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand Bottom of Boring -29 feet GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCTION ..... ·•: •,, ·.· .. · ... . ... ... . " .......... · ...... ·_.:.-.. : .. •, ·.· .. . . ::::;.:· ..... . SHEET ___ OF __ _ I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY P.O. BOX 27687 -RALEIGH,N.C.27611, PHONE (919) 733-5083 I WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD lRILLING CONTRACTOR 1,,vi {$0>1 [ "'§ 1 neet,., Ass cc I .. te S 'RILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER g ~ 7 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) I Nearest Town: J\l\o..-r,s vii(~) ;V C. Konners Roa.d.. Moff",sv,lfe. (Road. Community, or S~bdivision and Lot No.} I OWNER K'oppers Co . .rnc.. ADDRESS f..,5,..,eereJ WcqJ Si,sfeMS,R.t:.5'f :1~ //,; [Street or R9~te No.) ' L.."..!orr,sv1 c. ;V.C. ' City OJ T!wn Stale Zip Code . DATE DRILLED ?f6U6 USE DF WELL Monitor,aJ I TOTAL DEPTH 2 S-' CUTTINGS COLLECTED fil Yes □ No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? □ Yes GJ"No 5. STATIC WATER LEVEL: {/.23 FT. □ above TOP OF CASING, GY"below I roP OF CASING Is _2 ___ FT. ABOVE LAND suRFACE. ,. YIELD (gpm): ______ METHOD OF TEST _______ _ I WATER ZONES (depth):----------------- 9. CHLORINATION: Type Amount . E CASING: I Fror,l From From I GROUT: From I From "· SCREEN: 0 0 S.!: Wall Thickness Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material To Cj_j Ft. 2" PVC To Ft. To Ft. Depth Material Method To 5'. t; Ft. Ce rne n t <t-(3e,,fon,te P, wd.er To 7.,, Ft. 5e0-I-Be~t,.,,te Pelle~ Depth Diameter Slot Size Material I From 9. !:" To2'+.r-Ft. 2 in.0.010 in. PVC.. FrJm ____ To ___ Ft. ____ in. ___ in. From To Ft. ____ in. ___ in. , I .. _ GRAVEL PACK: I Depth Size From _7._._~ __ To 2 5" Ft. -~6_'_1 __ Material So..nd.. From ____ To ___ Ft. _____ _ Ouad. No. _______ Serial No. ___ _ Lat. Long. ____ Pc __ Minor Basin ____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION l"l\o/-7 PERMIT NUMBER: ')I -02.55"-W'M-023!, County: Depth From To DRILLING LOG Formation Descriotion ---~5e"=e. cd@chrd sherT tf additional space is needed use back of lcrm. LOCA TtON SKETCH (Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads, or ·other map reference points) see s,fe •· REMARKS: t DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS N PROVID$P. TO E WELL OWNER. / C,{ I 1-2]/]6 I SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT ATE GW· 1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to welt owner. I I I I I I I I B I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING·WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC WELL NO. Mw-7 DRILLING METHOD __ H_o_ll..co_w_S_t_e_m_A_u__,g,__e_r ___ _ GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE GROUND ELEVATION. ___ _ GROUND WATER DEPTH {ft): TOP OF WELL ____ _ AT COMPLETION ____ _ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 15' of 0.010" slots DESCRIPTION Qray Br.o n me) ROCK fragments, wood chips, httle silt flLL Brown SILT and CLAY, tr f sand 8/6/86 GRAVEL PACK :~•.:,•:· BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ----- CONSTRUCTION Light purple to red/brown clayey SlL"J<weathered bedrock), tr f sand, some me sand 17 .5-19' '\ ... ·.·,· ·.•, ·,'., Bottom of Boring ~ 26 feet SHEET ___ OF __ _ I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONL y P.O. BOX 27687-RALEIGH,N.C, 27611, PHONE (919) 733-5083 I WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD .DRILLING CONTRACTOR Wilson f.-i81neer, .. ., Ass~,,~1es RILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER ___ g_~_I _____ _ 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show skelch of the location tielow) I Nearest Town: /Vlorr,s V11ft.) JV C. 11'.o poers R.oo.cl., Mor,., s v,lk, (Road, Community, or S~bdivision and Lot No.) I OWNER _:__:K's...:o=-;:f:.+P....:e.c.-r=-.5 _.::CC-'o"-. _x_,.,_'-~·~------- ADDRESS f Y13me•reJ. \.v99J Si,sfe,.,, s. R.t:. 5'f ,1,1 //f. (Streel or Ro~•• No.) ' I L.."..!orr,5v1 t:::...C. City Pf /T.own State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED 'tilt ?6 USE OF WELL ldonitor,a}l ,1 I ;;t I TOTAL DEPTH 2{, CUTTINGS COLLECTED Grves O No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? □ Yes Gl'No 6 STATIC WATER LEVEL· 7.50 FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING, ·I TOP OF CASING IS· __ 2. ___ FT. AroeiI~_wAND SURFACE. 7. YIELD (gpm): ______ METHOD OF TEST _______ _ I WATER ZONES (depth): ----------------- 9. CHLORINATION: Type Amount I CASING: Wall Thickness Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material 0 6 2" f Ve: From To Ft. I From To Ft. From To Ft. I GROUT: Depth Material Method From 0 To 3 Ft. (e,..e1-1t ,t-/3e1-1fon,te P.wder I From 3 To ~ Ft. Seo-I -GeHtonite. Pe 1/e-fs 12. SCREEN: I Depth Diameter Slot Size Material From 6 To 2~. r; FI. 2 in.0.0I0 in. eve. Fr.:im To Ft. in. in. I From To Ft. in. in. 13. GRAVEL PACK: 11 Deplh Size Material From S" To 2b FI. 6 I( So.,.,J. From To Ft. I REMARKS: Quad. No. _______ Serial No. ___ _ Lat. Long. ____ Pc __ Minor Basin _____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: ~I -02.5S"-l.'M-02.3!, County: Depth From k:ic.}fe To DRILLING LOG Formation Description ____ .,,Se...,.e 0--ft-a.cl,rJ. Sheet" 11 additional space is needed use back of form. LOCATIQN SKETQH (Show direction and distance from at !east two State Roads, or other map reference points) see sde mo.p I SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DAT GW-1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC WELL NO. MW-8 ORI LL! NG METHOD __ H_o_ll_o_w_S_t_em_A_ug--"-e_r ___ _ GEOLOGIST S.A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services GROUND ELEVATION ---- TOP OF WELL ____ _ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) CASING MATERIAL STRAT SAMPLE DEPTH DEPTH 2" PVC DATE GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): AT COMPLETION'------ AFTER HOURS SCREEN 201 of 0.010 slots DESCR I PT! ON Black fm ROCK fragments, little fmc sand, tr silt 10 Brown CLAY and SILT, tr fm sand, tr f rock fragments 8/4/86 GRAVEL PACK :~•.;.•:· BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCTION ...... .. Red/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr frock fragments, tr laminae of light green clay 20 Red/Brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), light green laminae 14.5-16.5' Bottom of Boring -26.5 feet .. ·. ,· SHEET ___ OF __ _ I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Of NA TIJRAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONhEHTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNOWATER SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONL y P.O. BOX 27687 -RAL.EIGH,N.~.27e11, PHONE (919) 733-5083 I WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD I . DRILLING CONTRACTOR wi/so" ["131rieet,") Assce1~tes RILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER __ g=-.;:.~_I;__ ___ _ 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) I Nearest Town: Mcr"r15 v,({~) /V C. h'.o noers R.oo.cl, /lllorr,s v,lk, (Roa[ Community, or S~bdivision and Lot No.) I OWNER K'oppers Co . .Inc.. ADDRESS [ n31neereJ.. WooJ Si,sfer1 s. (<.'C. 5'f I /110 rr,5v1f le (Street or ~c No.) City:/ or/Town ·State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED 'J))_~b USE OF WELL Mon;tor,aJ I TOTAL DEPTH 2/1 CUTTINGS COLLECTED U1Yes O No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes GJ"No I STATIC WATER LEVEL: (;.Jj FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING, 2 Gl""below TOP OF CASING IS.-""'---FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE. 7. YIELD (gpm): ______ METHOD OF TEST I WATER ZONES (depth): ----------------- 9. CHLORINATION: •· CASING: Type ____ _ Amount Wall Thickness Diameter or Weight/Ft. I Depth From _O~ __ To ,5-2" Ft.~=--- From ____ To ___ Ft, ___ _ From ____ To FL---- Material f Ve. 1· GROUT: Depth Material Method From I From 12. SCREEN: 0 To /,!;" /. 5"" To 3. 5" Ft. Cer<>ei,T ,t-f3e,.fon,te P,wder Ft. Seo.I -Be.t,.,ite. Pellefs I I Oeprtt From S-To 2. I ---- Diameter Slot Size Material Ft._2=..._in.0.010 in. PVC.. FrJm ____ To ___ Ft. ____ in. ___ in. From To Ft. ____ in. ___ in. 13. GRAVEL PACK: Depth Size 3. !,-2 6 6 11 From To Ft. ---''----I Materiat s 0-r-.d. From ____ To ___ Ft. _____ _ Quad. No. _______ Serial No. ___ _ Lat. Long. ____ Pc_ Minor Basin ____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: o/l -02.SS--I-IM-02.31, County: Wc. ){ e Depth DRILLING LOG From To Formation Description -----'-"'-e o.'ltc..d,eci. Sheet If additional space is needed use back ol form. LOCATION SKETCH (Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads, or ·otheir map relerence points) See I· REMARKS:------------------------------------------- 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HA~EN PROVIDED T~~ WELL OWNER. / j I ~ y'. ~ /2. ZJ[jt SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT 'oA TE GW·I Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division al Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I I i i I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC WELL NO. MW-9 DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE GROUND ELEVATION ----GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL ____ _ AT COMPLETION ----- DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 16' of 0.010 slots DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand 8/5/86 GRAVEL PACK :~•.;.•:' BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCTION Mottled Brown and gray/green SILT and CLAY, tr f sand, tr f rock fragments Mottled Brown and gray/green clayey SILT, tr f sand Brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand, tr m rock fragments (25-26.5') Bottom of Boring -26.5 feet :·, ·,· .. · ... . ' ··.: SHEET OF ------ I NORTH CAROLINA OEPARThENT Of NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIAONJ.ENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONL y P.O. BOX 27687 -RALEIGH.N.C. 27611, PHONE {918) 733-5083 I WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD •□RILLING CONTRACTOR Mlso" r,,,,,,eet,..,) Assoe1Ates •□RILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER __ ..::.g...:c~_I _____ _ 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show skelch ol lhe lo ca lion below) I NearesI Town: ;1/lof"r15 V1fft) JV C. Koppers R.o~d) Marr,s v,lk, (Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.) I OWNER ____,_,K'c..:o+f+fc..::.e.:...r:c.5 _.o=C:..::o"-. --'-.I_n_c._,. _______ _ · ADDRESS f v,3meereJ W'ooJ S,,sfer1 s. R.t. 5'f /1/1 lie_ (Streel or Ao~le No.) ' ~orr,sv, f'!:...C. I Cit/y or/Town State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED 'I? 5" 86 USE OF WELL Monitor,,,,, r 1/ -;t I·. TOTAL DEPTH 215 CUTTINGS COLLECTED Gl'Yes O No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes GJ"'No 6. STATIC WATER LEVEL:. /5','f,l_ FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING, '1. Gd"below I TOP OF CASING IS--~ FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE . ... YIELD (gpm): ______ METHOD OF TEST _______ _ 1· WATER ZONES (deplh): ----------------- 9. I I I CHLOAINA TION: Type Amount CASING: From From From GROUT: From Depth -=---To 0 21 Diameter Wall Thickness or Weight/Ft. 2" Ft._=-- ____ To ___ Ft. ___ _ ----To FL---- Material I' Ve: Depth Material Method 0 To / 7 ---- ' From . SCREEN: /7 ____,___:__To I 9 Ft. (e,.,,e,,t.-6e .. t,a,te P,wd.er Ft. Seed -Be~t,,,ite. Pellefs I Depth From_2_I __ To 28 Diameter Slot Size Material Ft.__::2=-_in.0.01O in. PVC. Fr.:,m ____ To ___ Ft. ____ in. ___ in . I From To Ft. ____ in. ___ in. .. 3. GRAVEL PACK: I Depth Size 1'1 28 6" From ---'---To Ft. ----'"------ Material So.nd. From ____ To ___ Ft. _____ _ Quad. No. ______ Serial No. ___ _ lat. Long. ____ Pc_ Minor Basin _____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: 11 -02.S'S--w'M-02.31, ,,.,,.'w'-/0 County: Wc..h'e Depth DRILLING LOG From To Formation Oescriotion ___ ....;St.Ee=...e o. tt«, l,e ol s lieef- If additional space is needed use back of lorm. LOCATION SKETCH (Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads, or ·oth0r map reference points) see srfe rv,o.p f· REMARKS:---------------------------------------------- 1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C, WELL ONS AUCTION ST ANDAADS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS ,§E~_PAOVIDED TO WELL OWNER. ~U. l22•J'/ I SIGNA TUAE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE GW-1 Revised 11 /84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :1 I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC WELL NO. MW-10 DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Wash Rotary GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE GROUND ELEVATION ----GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL AT COMPLETION ----------- DEPTH OF WELL {ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 7' of 0.010" slots STRAT SAMPLE DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION Maroon/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, roots, light green clay pockets. 1.5-3 .0' 8/5/86 GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCTION Maroon/Brown, gray/purple to yellow/brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand (0 -10.5' sample descriptions taken from Boring B-4) 10 20 Bottom of Boring -28.5 feet SHEET ___ OF __ _ I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ANO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONL y P.O. BOX 27687 -RALEIGH.N.C. 27611, PHONE (919) 733-5083 I WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD 'RILLING CONTRACTOR W, /so" f .-i31 Mef-1") Assoc ,~ies 'RILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER ---'--g_i_7 _____ _ 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of !he location b·elow) I Nearest Town: /V\or-r,5 v,/{L} /v. C. h:o Peers Ro"cl.. Morr,s v,l[e (Road, Community, or S~bdivision and Lot No.) I owNER -'--'K''---'o+fl+P...ce_r=--s _C=--.co..,_. _.r_,..._c.~·-------- ADDREss I: f"~ ,rieereJ. Woo cl Srsfer1 s. R.t:. 5't ,1,1 //; (Street or Ro~te No.l ' L.!'..!orr,sv, c. &C. I Ci~ p 1 r 9 Tp:; 6 n State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED o/i {~ USE OF WELi. Monitor,~., I TOTAL DEPTH '31. !: _ CUTTINGS COLLECTED Cia'Yes □ No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? □ Yes l:it'No 6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: /I{. 5'lf FT. Q_,above TOP OF CASING. ' 2 w below TOP OF CASING IS-'~--FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE. YIELD (gpm): ______ METHOD OF TEST -------~ .WA TEA ZONES (depth): ----------------- 9. CHLORINATION: Type Amount ti CASING: Depth Diameter Wall Thickness or Weight/Ft. Material From __ Q __ To 2/.r Ft. 2" ('Ve I From ----To ___ Ft. ___ _ From To FL---- Depth ,.GROUT: From _a=--To I 7 I From --'-/_7 __ To I 9 ,, SCREEN: Material Method Ft. (er,,e,.t"" Be .. fo.,,te P.wder Ft. 5eo-.l -Be"t..,ite. Pellet's I Depth Diameter Slot Size Material From 21. :;-To "J/. 5' Ft. 2 in.0.0/0 in. PVC.. Fr .Jm To Ft. in. in. I From To Ft. in. in. GRAVEL PACK: I Depth Size Material From / 9 To "]I. f; FI. 6 // So. ... cl. From To Ft. Quad. No. _______ Serial No. ___ _ Lat. Long. ____ Pc __ Mlnor Basin ____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent. __ _ STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: 'II -02.!iS--w'M-02.31, County: Depth From To See DRILLING LOG Formation Description II additional space is needed use back of le.rm. LOCATION SKETCH (Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads, or ·other mac reference points) See sife I REMARKS:------------------------------------------- 1 DO HEREB_ Y CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C, WELL CONST,RUCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HA BEEN PROVIDED TO E WELL OWNER. ' /_ a 12. zt r6 I SIONA TURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE' G'N· 1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC DRILLING METHOD Wash Rotary WELL NO. MW-11 GEOLOGIST s. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services GROUND ELEVATION __ _ TOP OF WELL ____ _ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) CASING MATERIAL 2" p1;c DATE 8/19/86 GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): AT COMPLETION ----- AFTER HOURS SCREEN 10' of 0.010" slots GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- STRAT SAMPLE DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION Brown cla e SILT tr f sand, roots Brown clayey SILT .. ,ith white SILT and CLAY laminae, Brown/Red clayey SIIT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand 10 (0-10.5 feet sample descriptions taken from Boring B~2)- 20 Bottom of Boring - 3 2 feet SHEET ___ OF __ _ I NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES_ ANO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNDWATER SECTION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY P.O. BOX 27687 -RALEl~.N.C. 27611, PHONE (918) 733-5083 I WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD ~RILLING CONTRACTOR w, {50>1 [...,BI Mer,") Asso, ,~tes 'RILLER REGISTRATION _NUMBER ---=-g~~_I ____ _ 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) I Nearest Town: JVlo,-r,s v,lfr) ;V. C. Koppers Roa.d.1 Marr,iv,lk. (Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.} I ER /-(opgers Co . .r .. c... A ODWDNRE S S I=-l=-t r,~ineerec! W'99J Si,sfe;,,, s, R.t:. 5't ,M II ; (Slreel or Ro~te No.) ' I _orr,sv, c. !:!:_C. City pr Tpwn State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED lf49/86 USE OF WELL /\IJQoitor,aJ I TOTAL DEPTH 30. . CUTTINGS COLLECTED @°Yes O No DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? □ Yes Cid'No 6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: / b · 3 9 FT. 0 9bove TOP OF CASING, 2. uJ"below I TOP OF CASING IS ____ FT. ABOV; LAND SURFACE. 7. YIELD (gpm): _____ METHOD OF TEST ______ _ I WATER ZONES (dep1h): ---------------- 9. CHLORINATION: Type Amount I CASING: From 0 I From Wall Thickness Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material 2" f VC: Ft._~-- ----To ___ ft. ___ _ Depth To J.0 ---- From ----To ---Fl.---- Depth Material Method I. GROUT: From ~O __ ro t 5", S' Ft. Ce ,.,,e 11 t ,i-6e,,fon,te P. wder !5".5' To /7,5'" Ft. Se<>-1-Be~t.,,ite. Pellets I I I I From SCREEN: From 2.0 From From GRAVEL PACK: From / 7. 5" From REMARKS: Depth To ]O Ft. To Ft. To Ft. Depth To 10 Ft. To Ft. Diameter Slot Size Material 2 in.0.0I0 in. PVC in. in. in. in. Size Material 6 It So..,J. Quad. No. ______ Serial No. ___ _ Lat. Long. ____ Pc_ Minor Basin ____________ _ Basin Code ____________ _ Header Ent. ______ GW-1 Ent.- STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: '11 -02.55"-WM-02.3E. County: Depth From ldc...Ke To DRILLING LOG Formation Description ----~e oitacl,eJ sl,ee-r II additional space is needed use back of !arm. LDC A TION SKf.K!:i (Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads, or 'other map reference points) 5 ee I I I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C. WELL CONST UCTION STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HA B EN PROVIDED TO E LL OWNER. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE GW-1 Revised 11/84 Submit original to Division at Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING·WELL LOG PROJECT _ _::Ral=e"'ig"'h-'-''-"N.:cC=--· ______________ _ WELL NO. MW-12 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLING METHOD \\ash Rotary -----~------ DRILLER Soil Testing Sel"Vices DATE GROUND ELEVATION. ___ _ GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL. ____ _ AT COMPLETION. ____ _ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) . AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" pyr, SCREEN 10' of 0.010" slots STRAT SAMPLE DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION 8/19/86 GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ----- CONSTRUCTION Red/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr frock fragments, roots 10 20 30 Red/Brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand (0-12.5' sample descriptions taken from Boring B-1) Bottom of Boring -30.5 feet . . ... . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . ... .. .. ... . . . . . .. •:,:: ·.·• .. SHEET _ __;,_OF __ _ I I KEYSTONE [t-.VIROSMENTAL RESOURCES, INC. Ref. 8, Encl. 2 I 440 College Park Dr., Monroeville, PA 15146 ----------------- • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC WELL NO. MW-1 DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger GEOLOGIST s. A. Colton --C..C..:c:.c....cc..:.c;.;..;.c.;__ __ _ DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 8/7/86 GROUND ELEVATION.___ GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL_____ AT COMPLETION ____ _ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 20' of 0.010" slots DESCRIPTION Brown, clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr weathered rock fragments, tr m quartz fragments, tr roots (0-1.5') J.lottled Brown and gray silty CLAY, tr f sand, tr f rock fragments. Red/brown Clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr siltstone fragments, tr f sand Bottom of Boring -26.5 feet GRAVEL PACK :~•.:,•:· BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCTION .. . ••, .',,: . ,' SHEET OF ·•,• ,·,, -------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC WELL NO. MW-2 DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 8/7 /86 GROUND ELEVATION ----GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL AT COMPLETION ----------- DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL · 2" PVC SCREEN 19' of 0.010" slots 12 DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr siltstone fragments, roots 0-1.5', 9-10.5' Mottled gray /green/yellow /orange clayey SILT, (weathered bedrock) Bottom of Boring -26.5 feet GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN CONSTRUCTION .;. . =· SHEET OF ------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger WELL NO. MW-3 GEOLOGIST s. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE GROUND ELEVATION __ _ GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL _____ _ AT COMPLETION ----- DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 10' of 0.010" slots 8/11/86 GRAVEL PACK :~•-:.•:· BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION Yellow /brown SILT, tr f sand, tr f rock fragments, roots Brown/red to gray/purple clayey SILT, tr f sand Gray/purple to brown clayey SILT, (weathered bedrock), tr f sand Bottom of Boring -21.5 feet SHEET ___ OF __ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT __ R_al_e~igh~,_N_c ______________ _ WELL NO. MW-4 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DR I LUNG METHOD __ H_oll_ow_S_t_em_A_u~g~e_r ____ _ DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 8/14/86 GROUND ELEVATION GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): ---- TOP OF WELL AT COMPLETION ------------- DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 12' of 0.01011 slots STRATA SAMPLE DEPTH DEPTH ><-- - .. 10;,::,--.,_;.--+>< I- -><-. -- zn ><--- DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, roots Brown silty CLAY, tr f sand Yellow/brown to brown clayey SILT, tr to little emf sand Red/brown to purple/maroon clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE ·i.j ,s;.:.~,f-~~ ;-.!":'~.:.;, · SCREEN ---- " .. -- .. .. -- --. - .. CONSTRUCTION ,,, ,✓ y\ ,.,,',. . ' ,, ,, I ., ·-... .. •-·:· ....... -:·.·: .. : ', ~ :.\· ·:.<: -;·:·•:·. ': ·: ·•-.·· •,• ·-· :·:: _:_·;: ,, . ·.·. -·:·-·.·.• ,,. -.. -. ,., --:.:; .-. . .. -·-.... •:, . :· :·?\~/( -------- ----- --- -- - --- Purple/maroon clayey SILT and SAND (weathered bedrock) - --.. - - -- -- -- -Bottom of Boring -24 feet --------- ------- --. .. ---.. -- -- --- - --- --- --- -- -- SHEET ___ OF __ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT __ R_al_e~ig~h~,_N_C ________________ _ WELL NO. MW-5 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE GROUND ELEVATION ----GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL AT COMPLETION ----------- DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 20' of 0.010" slots DESCRIPTION 8/1/86 GRAVEL PACK :~•.:.•:· BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN CONSTRUCTION Brown clave SILT tr f sand, tr frock fra ments FILL Light Brown SILT, tr f sand (FILL) Brown to maroon/purple clayey SILT, tr f sand, -l<"--....::,.1-tr light brown silt laminae 10 Maroon/purple to gray clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), -k--=--·tr f sand, little m rock fragments 25.5-26.5' Bottom of Boring -26.5 feet ... ·.• ·•.·. :•. . '• ••.· SHEET ___ OF __ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I ·I I I I I 'I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger WELL NO. MW-6 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 7/28/86 GROUND ELEVATION ----GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL ____ _ AT COMPLETION. ____ _ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL . 2" PVC SCREEN 17' of 0.010" slots DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr fm rock fragments Brown CLAY and SILT, tr f sand Red/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, some gray/green silty CLAY ockets Maroon clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand Gray/green to gray/brown SILT and CLAY, tr f sand Gray/Brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand Bottom of Boring -29 feet GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCTION . ·, • .. . : . ·' : ,:: ':. SHEET ___ OF __ _ I I I I I I I I I I :I :1 I I I .I I ii I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC WELL NO. M w-7 DR ILL! NG METHOD __ H_o_ll_o_w_S_t_e_m_A_u~g~e_r ___ _ GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE GROUND ELEVATION ----GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL. ____ _ AT COMPLETION ----- DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 211 PVC SCREEN 15' of 0.01011 slots DESCRIPTION Gray Bro n mc)ROCK fragments, wood chips, lI ttle silt FILL Brown SILT and CLAY, tr f sand 8/6/86 GRAVEL PACK :~•.:.•:" BENTON I TE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCTION Light purple to red/brown clayey SIL7<weathered bedrock), tr f saner: some me sand 17.5-19' ... ·,,. Bottom of Boring.-26 feet SHEET ___ OF __ _ I I I I I I I I I I :I I I I : I II I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC DRILLING METHOD __ H_o_ll_o_w_S_t_em_A_ug-"--e_r ___ _ WELL NO. MW-8 GE OL OG IS T S.A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE GROUND ELEVATION __ _ GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL ____ _ AT COMPLETION ----- DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 20' of 0.010 slots DESCRIPTION Black fm ROCK fragments, little fmc sand, tr silt Brown CLAY and SILT, tr fm sand, tr f rock fragments 8/4/86 GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN {(~~~J"It·· ':!."':.':. f✓• ---------- CONSTRUCTION .. . .. : . .... " . Red/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr frock fragments, tr laminae. of light green clay ... . •,• . ,, Red/Brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), light green laminae 14.5-16.5' Bottom of Boring -26.5 feet "·, ',• .. •,• .. •,'. SHEET ___ OF __ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC WELL NO. MW-9 DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DRILLER Soil Testing Services GEOLOGIST __ S._A_._c_o_I_to_n ___ _ DATE GROUND ELEVATION ----GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL AT COMPLETION ----------- DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL 2" PVC SCREEN 16' of 0.010 slots DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand 8/5/86 GRAVEL PACK :~•.;.•:· BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCTION Mottled Brown and gray/green SILT and CLAY, tr f sand, tr_f rock fragments Mottled Brown and gray/green clayey SILT, tr f sand Brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand, tr m rock fragments (25-26.5') Bottom of Boring -26_.5 feet SHEET ___ OF __ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC WELL NO. MW-10 DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Wash Rotary GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services GROUND ELEVATION. ___ _ TOP OF WELL'------ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) CASING MATERIAL . 2" PVC DATE GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): AT COMPLETION. ____ _ AFTER HOURS SCREEN 7' of 0.010" slots 8/5/86 GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- STRATA SAMPLE DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION 10 Maroon/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, roots, light green clay pockets. 1.5-3 .0' Maroon/Brown, gray/purple to yellow/brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand (0 -10.5' sample descriptions taken from Boring B-4) Bottom of Boring -28.5 feet SHEET ___ OF __ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. I ·I I MONITORING.WELL LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC DR I LL! NG METHOD __ ...:.W:..:a:::.sh:..:....:.R:.c:o-'-'ta'-r-"-y _____ _ WELL NO. MW-11 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services GROUND ELEVATION ----TOP OF WELL ____ _ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) CASING MATERIAL 2" P\'C DATE GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): AT COMPLETION ----- AFTER HOURS SCREEN 10' of 0.010" slots 8/19/86 GRAVEL PACK BENTONITE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- STRAT SAMPLE DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCT! ON Brown cla e SILT tr f sand roots Brown clayey SILT .. ,jth white SILT And CLAY IRr!linae, Brown/Red clayey SIIT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand (0-10.5 feet sample descriptions taken from Boring B~2) 20 . · . Bottom of Boring -32 feet· . SHEET OF -------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I :I I I I I I MONITORING WELL LOG PROJECT _ _:::_Ral=e::iig,:_h2,..:.N:..::C:_ ____________ _ WELL NO. MW-12 GEOLOGIST s. A. Colton DRILLING METHOD:...____::\\as=h:...:R::.o:..:t=a..:.ry,__ _____ _ DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 8/19/86 GROUND ELEVATION. ___ _ GROUND WATER DEPTH (ft): TOP OF WELL. ____ _ AT COMPLETION. ____ _ DEPTH OF WELL (ft) AFTER HOURS CASING MATERIAL STRAT SAMPLE DEPTH DEPTH 10 20 30 2" PVC SCREEN 10' of 0.010" slots DESCRIPTION Red/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr f rock fragments, roots Red/Brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand (0-12.5' sample descriptions taken from Boring B-1) Bottom of Boring -30.5 feet GRAVEL PACK ;~-.;.•:" BENTON I TE BACK FILL CONCRETE · SCREEN ---------- CONSTRUCT! ON .. , '• .. ·.·.· ... .. ,', · .. . . SHEET ___ OF __ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC BORING NO. B-1 --- DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger GEOLOGIST s. A. Colton ---------DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 7/21/86 DESCRIPTION Red/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr frock fragments, roots 0-1.5' 4 Red/Brown to Maroon clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand 5 10---- Bottom ·of Boring -12.25 feet SHEET OF I I I I I I I I I I I I I D I I I I 5 10 BORING LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC ----------------DRILLING METHOD Ho))ow Stem Anger DRILLER -Soil Testing Services DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, roots BORING NO. 8--2 GEOLOGIST s. A. Colton DATE 7/24/86 Brown clayey SILT with white SILT and CLAY laminae, tr f sand Brown/red clayey SILT (weathered bedrock) Bottom of Boring -9.1 feet SHEET OF I I I I I I I I I I I I H I I I I I I 5 10 BORING LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC BORING KO. DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger GEOLOGIST s. A. Colton DATE 7/24/86 DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr to some sand, tr f rock fragments Red/Brown SILT and CLAY, tr f sand Red/Brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand, tr f rock fragments Bottom of Boring -9.3 feet SHEET OF B--3 I I I I I I I 5 I I I • g 10 I I I I 15 I I I BORING LOG PROJECT __ R-al_e~ig~h~•~N___:C _________ _ DRILLING ME1'HO'D Hollow Stem Auger DRILLER Soil < Testing Services DESCRIPTION BORING NO. C-4 GEO LOG I ST S. A. Colton DATE 7/24/86 Maroon/brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, roots, light green clay pockets (1.5-3') Maroon/brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand SHEET 1 OF 2 I I I I I I II :I I I I I I I I, ' 1· I I BORING LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC ----~------------ .DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DRILLER Soil Testing Services STRATA SAMPL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION BORING NO. 8-4 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DATE 7/24/86 Maroon/brown clayey SILT ( weathered bedrock), tr f sand Bottom of Boring -22 feet 25 SHEET 2 OF 2 ---- I I I I I I I I I I 5 10 BORING LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC BORING NO, B-5 DRILLING METHOD Hn))nw Stem Auger GEO LOG I ST S. A. Colton DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 7/21/86 DESCRIPTION Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, t fm siltstone fragments (Fill) Lt. Brown SILT, some fm rock fragments, tr f sand, (Fill) Brown silty CLAY, tr f sand J?rown/Maroon SILT and CLAY, tr f sand Maroon clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand, tr rock fragments SHEET_j_OF __ 2_ I I I I I I :I I I I B I: I BORING LOG PROJECT ___ R_al_e_i~g~h~,_N_C _________ _ DRILLING METHOD Ho))ow Stem Auger DRILLER Soil Testing Services STRATA SAMPL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION BORING NO. B-5 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton DATE 7/21/86 Maroon clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand, tr rock fragments 25 Bottom of Boring -25 feet SHEET 2 OF 2 I I I I I I I I I ,1 I ' I I ' I D I I I BORING LOG PROJECT Raleigh NC BORING NO. B-6 DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton ----'----'----'------ DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 7/22/86 ST!<ATA SAMPL DEPTH DEPTH 5 10 DESCRIPTION Light Brown SILT, some fm rock fragments Black, red brown siltv CLAY tr f sand Brown CLAY and gray SILT, tr f sand, tr f gravel Brown silty CLAY, tr f sand Maroon clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand Bottom of Boring -10.5 feet SHEET OF I I I I I I ':I I II I I I I I 1:, I' I I I 5 10 BORING LOG . PROJECT Raleigh, NC DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DESCRIPTION Wood chips Light Brown silty CLAY, tr f sand Light Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand Brown/green SILT and CLAY, tr f sand BORING NO. B-7 GEOLOGIST S. A. Colton ---------DATE 7/2] /86 Red/brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand Bottom of Boring -10.25 feet SHEET OF I I I I I I I I II I ! I I ' I I I BORING LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DRILLER Soil Testing Services BORING NO.B-1O GEOLOGIST S.A . Colton DATE 7/22/86 STRATA DESCRIPTION 5 Brown clayey SILT to light hrown silt (Fill) Maroon clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), green clay laminae (7 .5-8.0) tr f sand Gray clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand, tr f rock fragments SHEET 1 OF 2 ---- I 11 I \I \1 ' I ' 'I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I • I I n i I I , I BORING LOG . PROJECT __ ~R~al~e~ig~h~7~N~C~--------- DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DRILLER Soil Testing Services STRATA SAMPL DEPTH DEPTH DESCRIPTION BORING NO. B-10 GEOLOGIST S.A. Colton DATE 7/22/86 Gray clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand, tr f rock fragments Bottom of Boring -24.0 feet 25 SHEET 2 OF 2 ---- I I I I I I i I I I I i I I I I I ! I I I ' ' D I D I I I I 5 10 BORING LOG PROJECT · Raleigh, NC · DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DRILLER Soil Testing Services DESCRIPTION BORING NO. B-11 GEOLOGIST S.A. Colton DATE 7 /25/86 Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr f rock fragments roots Mottled light brown silty CLAY and red/brown clayey SILT, tr f sand Red/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand Mottled Red/brown clayey SILT and It. green silty CLAY, tr f sand Red/Brown clayey SILT, tr f sand Red/Brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr cf sand Bottom of Boring -9.75 feet SHEET OF I I I I I ii I ii I II I 'I I I ! I I I i I I I I B I ! D i ! I I I i I 5 10 BORING LOG . PROJECT Raleigh, NC DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DRILLER Soil Testing Services DESCRIPTION BORING NO. B--12 GEOLOGIST s. A. Colton DATE 7/25/86 Brown, clayey SILT, tr f sand, tr f rock fragments Light Brown silty CLAY, tr f sand Brown SILT and CLAY, tr c sand Light Brown/green silty CLAY, tr f sand Light Brown CLAY and SILT, tr c sand, tr f rock fragments Red/brown SILT and Lt. green CLAY, tr f sand Bottom of Boring -10.5 feet SHEET OF I I I I I I !1 I II I \1 11 I ii II II ' ii I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC ----------------BORING No.B-14 GEO LOG I ST s. A. Colton DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DRILLER STRATA SAMPL DEPTH DEPTH 5 10 Soil Testing Services DATE 7/25/86 DESCRIPTION Augered through fill (Lt. Brown SILT, tr f sand) First sample at 2.5 feet ,, Gray/brown CLAY and SILT, tr f sand, tr frock fragments Brown/green silty CLAY, tr fm sand, tr frock fragments Gray clayey SILT, tr f sand Brown SILT and CLAY, tr f sand Bottom of Boring -7 feet SHEET OF I I I I I :I !1 I 1• I I I I I I 10 i \' I i\ I I \ II ~\ I ! I I I I BORING LOG PROJECT Raleigh, NC BORING NO.B-15 GEOLOGIST S.A. Colton DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger DRILLER Soil Testing Services DATE 7/25/86 DESCRIPTION Brown CLAY and SILT tr f sand tr frock fra ments (Fill) Light Brown SILT, little f sand, tr m rock fragments (!.5-3.0 feet) (Fill) Mottled Brown and green SILT and CLAY, tr f sand, tr rock fragments (6-7 .5 feet) Light Brown clayey SILT, tr fm sand Mottled Red SILT and Green CLAY, tr f sand Red/brown clayey SILT, tr f sand Red/brown clayey SILT (weathered bedrock), tr f sand Bottom of Boring -10.25 feet SHEET OF I I I I ·.:'.: I I I I I I I ,'_:.·. I Rj1leigh, NC , Soil Analyses (17 5-1792-77) Attached are rest4ts of analyses on September 26, 19&6'at the Raleigh site. RDH:da Attachment cc: M. J. Dvorsky R. L. Weightman S. Colton '·;· ·!,'c.-,~ ~-i,':~~~· :~~~· ... .. • ... .,.,_ ... ,;. ·'.":'".;1:.~=--::: .. · . ;.1~~r..~·:.·- ,.._ .• , . :,;_<.·--· .. ',:· -i-~( .. ·-:--~.--..... '•·· ., .... -~·· -~ .. . :-,---~~;;.~1\) -~ -fiiil • c:=i c:::::J c::::i ~ Q D \\) \\ oy t iiiii liilll iiiiii I I I :--/Jla I :F--,, l I L__jJ I I I 'D: ' I I - I / I " i I I I \ q Di' ' I iiiii iiiii iiiiii iiiiii iiiii iiiiii SCJJ.£ (FEET) !00 0 100 200 300 iiiii ' ' 0 iiiii D ~ CEHETARY"<> C> LOCATION HA RALEIGH/NORRIS:ILLE. KOPPERS COMPANY I • • NC, iiiii " " " " " " " r_(, u C• I) I w " ff It -' It 0: " r"· II z " w " ~ z It " " " " w" (~.I II 0: " 11 " r, " " ' " " " Z II (1 11 " 0 ltJ II n .:.:::, II (.1 ,:, 0: II fl II 0 II II tr II It ·-11 II :, z " w w " z u r, II I:_ II f_fl II > " w " ~ II " " " " " " " " "· " " " " " " " " " " (.f) II f-" z " w" f-II 2 II n 11 [l II " l,_ " 0 " w" .J " CD <[ - u lrl IL r UJ f-· <[ or ..J r, I._) r ., Ill I I-r .,: i:·, f- Ll a: f_) '" w 0 w u a: :) 0 <I) •(• •.V I{• '!) •f• •S• •[• •£• •f• •!;• If• ·=:-• \['· •r• o:, 0.1 (f• tJ.' ,_,--, n; O"l n:• u·, o_, 0·1 n_1 O'"• O• •[• •i• ,. •. ·!:• •[· •0 •f• •!:, ~• •D •f• ,,;:_, •r· ·::-• ,,;:_, If• r:o ,;I {l,1 o-, ,1, u·, n., cn n_1 lfl n.1 u, ni ,,-, ri· ' ... _ ...... ' ·, ' ' ' ' '' '' ·,' '' '-..... '' ~ 1f· •S• ~-• •t:. ,:,-•.[• •f· '(-' •f• •i:• •[• •::-• ,:;:, 1V · r,J flJ r,J roJ r,J f•J r,J r•J (ll nJ n1 (lJ [)J (lJ ij• •O •0 ~ •P ~ ~ ~ •0 •O •0 •0 ~ ·0 ·,' ' -, -.... (II ('lj {'J fl.J (1.J ()J {'lJ n_t Pl flJ (lj l"'lJ (IJ £'I! rot l"\J '-' ' ' ~ ' ' ' ' ..... ' c, (:', (, ,;, ,::,, ,J', 0 0 (_:, c, C\ (,· ,:;-c, ,.::, C• C' C, 0 0 O 0 •~~-,,:-, •.r· •.t• .,, •r· •r• ,,;, •0 •!:• ·-:· •~, •r· ·r• tr• n, er, n, lf• n.1 IY• r,.:, u·, n,1 o:i fJ.1 u-, o:; er, [)_1 01 n_:; tr• n_, U'• ·, ' '' ·,' ·, '' '''' ·, ~ ~~~~ ~-~~~ ~~~ ~~ ("II nJ f•I f•.' ("II n.1 fl! fl~ fll I\J Pl f)j (lJ nJ r,J flj rl f•j r.•J n: ' ''''' -, '' '·, '' ' ,) ,]', I•., ·~• iJ, ')' C• c, O c, 0 C• C• () (, n, tfl ff. l(• n: 1.-, o: rs, r,_: ' ·, ' -.... (',, ,;, (',. ,;. ,:;.. ,_.,,, ,-., r:· c, 0 \:, (, (.fl l_fr (fl 11, 1f1 r_,. 1_11 , .... ,_ .. , (ft I.fl IJI t(• ,,, ,_.-, IJI r_ft H, Ill I.II ,_.-, r_(1 ,_.._, ,_., 1.f""l ,,, :,", ff: _J _J _J _I _J _J _J J .. J I _J I _J --~ _J _J . .J _J •. I I _J _I _J _J . .J r,-i:::;. o 1~, o 1-:, ..:, ,.::i ,~, c, (1 ci c, c, 1-=., 1-1 ,-(_i •=1 (·, 1:1 ,·, 1~, c, ,:1 i-_, (1 ,-, ,:, ,_ , ,_(, rf, ,.r, rp 1_r_1 1f, ,_r, 1f; ,n r_f; ,,-, r_,·, ,:: 'F' ,_c, r_1: 11·, ff. 1::• '-'! 1_n ,r, r_<: ,1, ri, ,1. 1r1 ,,-. ,r, "' " ff"_! I er, ,::, rr~ 1_Y1 C,-:• I !1"'.' r r 0 0 or C 0 0) Iii 111 11-, II) .... 11'1 ,:t . .... 11'1 C•J aJ CD aJ r--(;,, .,. ,_;,, I I I I I ('Jf(t(f"t<:fQ"IJ"") mmmmmm r ,;-, ,::-, (1') ,;-, r J r 11·, •f 10 [·-t"--0) mmrnmmm 11·i 1,·, f(l -1 r·-•f• 0 or 0 ' r 0 0 11·1 Ii-; 11·1 ,), ,-;, ,;:-, ("ll 11; <j ,J, I I I I l•I nJ ••• (') rj <t 11.J li", O) V· ,·., .,... eu m m m m m m m m m m en m ru m ['-0) C-· 0 ("IJ (l) Q" I.() •!) (·- ~ ~ ~ r---['-r---['-~ ['-r---['-w ·00000000000 J I O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0) 0-0 ("IJ f'J o:;t 111 ·C• f' o·, 0· 1:"1 ["-[' Oj o:, O) O"• 0) O) n) 0"1 0) 0.1 ,}, G· G• G· 0 0 00000 00000('0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c, 0 0 OC•OOO C•OOOC• •-0 •::-•(.• •.(• ,.,:-, •.i·• •C• 0. I 1f• •0 •C• •D \£• •') •D ,,:, •.f• •D •D •D ~ I 0)0)0)0::tO"JQIO)CJ.\0)0)0)0:.• ~ I 2 2 Z Z L Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z r;-a: li!i!!!!!i a: ~ LL M (( '[' •D i.t· ,::, •[: •&• •,f• 1i'.> If• O)O)(J10)0)Q)Q)ffl\)"l Z L Z Z L Z 7. Z Z i!lil a: °ilill' o: M OJ z a: O) O) O) 0) 0) 0) O) 0> z~.zzzz-;rz a'' crliiilllt [f liilii ---- -- 111!!1 l!!m "'l) JJ=Po l)l!llli! ; .P!l.ilJJ ~ lJ IJiliil .JJ Rl:u ~ lJ li!ii J) Jiiiiii',, 2 z·z z z z z z z .? Z Z Z 7 Z Z Z 2 ~ Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ ):> oowwwmmmmmmmmmmwmmoommmmmmmmmoommm ~ G~G~GGGGGGGGGGG0GGGGG0m U 0OOO0OOO-::>•.)O QOt)OOOOOOOO S• •f• •D ,.:;:, ::, •!) •.0 (0 fO (D fO ,}1 (.I\ p-. (,J fl) Q •.'.:) I}) ,] ,j1 0000 0000 • .. O (U ,Jj i"O c11 .i. ,_.J ru 00000000000000oz r 000000000000000 "' ,:o ((t ~.J --J ..J -.J ...J --J --.J -.J -J -J ... --. ,:,-, ,J", () 0 •!) i'0 ...J ,,:;, l.l'I .f:> W foJ O •0 (_D ...J J) l:> )::. p ):; .t> J) p J:> p J:> p J:>" J) ..... p l> J:, J;, l> )::, J> J) }:;. )> J) )> J> l> }> , , , , , , , , , , , 1 ., 1, ., , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1_'1 i,11 •J1 (;"l 1Jl i_1l 1Jl 1Jl 111 (ll ,·_,l fJl 1_il (/1 1.11 (ii (Jl i.11 •_(I (/l •Jl (Jl (ii iii (I) (fl 1Jl ijl (Jl 1Jl fl:• ;lJ ({J 111 di Ill lll (ll lll 1{1 \ll (0 lll 11' tl• (11 •JI ill Ill HI ill (ll (1! (ll lll ill l1' L1) (ll (ll ~ -~ ~ 3 ~ 3 3 ~ J 3 J ~ ~ 3 3 3 ~ 3 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ 3 3 3 J 3 3 ~ -?.?.333".?. ,O ,!...,, .,:} -~J ,..:_1 \;j '· ,_ -... ·-., l<.J iu ••.' - 3 3 ~ 3 3 J 3 3 3 ,-j .(j 10 ,D ;_.::, ;Q ,c, u ,u 3 3 3 .Q •O .o -, .......... -.._ ... , ...... ' ' I.II 1.'l ;::_, J:, L) 0 (J O ':l ,'.) 0 ffl (o ,JJ .i. 1.11 'J' o 0 .:i o o o o ru m ,u :11 m 1u rn ,11 11.J ,11 1,J u; IJJ UJ ru m m w m 10 rn rn w :.n 0.1 m ro -J ,}. :3, <_IJ Lil .J:> ~ Ii} ,:,) (D OJ lD lO fl,] fl,] 1.r, f., t•J I,) l•I l•J ' l_ll f•J • •1 '·'' 1.11 ' ' '" ·.J i., ·11 -l_l'I ,:_, I ,:, I ,_,_. ,_.. l'O •~• ·C• (O (O ·-1 -'-0 .J I I I I I t,:,."• i:,. ,,;;:, ,. ' .._,, ,_fl 0 I ,:, I •':'"• !JJ '·'-' ._,-, r11 /)\ I O 0 ' Ul 1...•l Ul ,:, I O I O I ,.n 1_1.1 ,,, ·J cs I ,_,1 I i_ll (JI I t'l o, IJJ ,:_;:, ,:.,J I ,_.J :n (fl r -i r z m liiiiil II p " ID " r "m " " -" " II U) II C " :,; " :,; " )> " lJ " -< " II 0 " ,i " " )> " z " )> " r " -< " -i " "0 " )> "r " " CJ " )> " -i " )> iiiif. - " " " " " " " " II _:,,: "m " -< JI lfj II -t II 0 " z m " m n z u u C II -· II ll 1J a ll () ii II Z " u ti .1J U 11 u 6 II In II ('I " " " - " ' II ·') " ' tr ijJ II ,YI " " ?> I u ,:; II -•:.o " U Lt'l " " u " l> II ,;, " m " " " " II S, " m u z n -I " )> "r " II :U " m 11 (11 u 0 u ,_ " l) 11 ,_-i II ffl II •/J " " " " I 1· l<EYSTCll'lE Et•JV I RCiNMENTAL RE'3•:'11.JRCE·3 ----==-=========--=============================----'ABLE 1: SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA ---------=--------=--------------------PRODUCED O~l 1,119,,g.~ AT 00:51 =---=----===---======---=----'~Alv'PLE # IEXA'IALENT P.NS€,OO•:~,7 IN8600<:,8 NS•::,OO69 RN.9130070 ~r<S60071 N,360072 N.'36OO73 F:t-186OO74 ~Ne,•:,0075 11=:N,9·:)Q07t5 RN8'~•0077 r1,J,'?1SO078 rN-S·-~,Q,J'79 RN-3<:,008,0 l~Ne,600'3 1 N--8<::,o_ oe_2 N8600e3 PN-:.?-60Q.=:.4 tN·'=··:,ooss N2-,~•OO81:, RNe.r30O87 J: N -?-•o O ·) ,8 :? :r,JS•~C089 r·~J-~•-:-OO•~1O :":.·r-i::.,:,oo•:, -1 I:· ~-1 e ,:, o o '=·) : ~,·Jf,•;,01)':l'j c:::: :-J e •:, .-) o ·21 .:i I",.,:,.,,, 0 ,) ,, ':, F=. N ,3,;,,) 0 ·)6 I I I I I I RSLT.LNE CHROMIUM Ct1rom i um ( + 6) Ct1:--om i urn ( +6) ,::I1rom i um ( +I~) Ct1romium ( +6) Cll r ,:-,mi I_lm ( .,. -~. ) ct1rom I um ( + 1:, l cnrom i um { ·I-,::, ) ct1r,.)m, um ( + 1:) ) •::t1r,)m i um ( ~ \·', l 1:.t1rorvi i um ( + ,,:, ) Ct1rom i um ( .,. •~. ) 1:.nr,:-,m t ,_im ( + 6) cn ... omi•.im ( ... (~, ) c11rom I L-•m ( + .~. ) Ct1rom i um ( ~ 1.,:, ) cnrom1urn •: +1,:0 l ,:-~1rorrfi urn ( + (·'.·) Ct1:--(;m i um ( • t,:", .' Ct1 (Om i urn ( -t-,~. ) cn.-om1ur1 ( I-I;'., } c1·,r,:,m ! um ( +1.:,) ,: n r1:1m I um , + ·5) ,:n rom I um r. + (~. ) en; .:1rn I um ( .,. 1,:", l ;:.11 r ,:,m 1 um ( .,. ;~, ) .-:.!1 r<:•m I LH1'' ( +,.:,) C'l(O'"'n1Um ( + :.~, I ct·1r(:,m I ul'Tl ( + .~. Ct1rt)mivm ;' + •·=· ,::n r,:·,m i um ( + 1:S ) mg1~g mg/V~ mQIKQ mg;~g mg;~g mg1~:g mq/!-"1~ m,J I~--:, m1;_! / ~: l~ m,:;; I ~'.•j mg_,!<·;' !1'19 IV,) rr.q.1 ;,·9 ~n•:1 I f.'. •J mq I~: ,;J m,_J IV,) mq.1:.:.,~ ~1•~ ;;.:9 'Y\(j / !<.l~ r:·19 I,-•J rn,;i ..-~· ,~ tY·1J / •i •:1 f'T\1J/t" 9 m,J , ~-'.) mr:: / r: <_'. m9,. ~-,~ mq·., ,. ·'n•'.l / •· ') l'TIQ/i". ~•J.'i-',:i <0.'500 •', 0 . .:, 0 0 0.500 . ,:, :,,) Cl 0 ·5ZO <O.5O0 0 770 ,:0 500 0 530 ·,) 500 0 ~-10 ~00 ·0oc ·~· . ':· ,") ,:, 0 090 ·0.50') •0.500 ·J ::, ,:, (• · 0. :-•.)0 ,: ,,) :':, •)(• ,; 0 5•")0 . 0 . :: ,:,/) C -:-.·:-o '·' --:, ~) .. ' 13 . ,'). :'.··)( ~3 0 .::i.:3,:, :-,:,o :0 5•)·) 3•.)URC:::: 8!-1 5-3 81--:1.5-13 82-·1 S-3 82-7 .. '5-9 8.3-1. ':,-? 9·3-•:·1-1 0 .. :, 34-·\ 5-3 -34-'~1-·1 0. 5 25-·! '5-3 !35-·~-,-10.5 8<~,-·1 5-3 80-0-10 5 97-·?-4 5 37-9-10 5 BS-·\ 5-3 8@-0-JO 5 s..::•-4. ::--··=· 89-9--,o. :"· _-3·1c,-a. s--;, ?. ·\ •)-12 -1 ·::: ~1 i-1 ::,-3 3 1 1 -,;:, -1 ·=· -. =312.-1 :.-·3 3·12-•~~-:•).5 e1:::-i :--3 ~ 1 ::-•;,-·,)' l:il~-:'. :-.:.l 3•4-': ::. -7 ~--'" -·~· ? 1 ': -·:, -. -~· :':, P,C,.(3E 2 ======== ,n " " " " " " " II W II (._ I II 0: II =• II Ci II l_fl 11 UJ 11 a: " " ..J " <! f-II z " w :;: z C• tL > z Ill lJJ u z " n" i-::-u (/) II >-II w" :.::. II " II II II " II " " I!!!!! fl) II " " " lJJ II I~• I: <! " 0 1t C' II " I-II " " " ,r, 11 (j1 II '-" ,:;, II " ' " " " II z " C1 II Q w " ~,. " " q 11 U II a: ll 11 " " " <! II f-II <! " Q" " ..J " <! " (_j II -" f-" >-" ..J " <! II Z II <! II " l,.. II Q II " >-II 0: II <! II :e_ II :e. " :) II U) 11 " " " " w" ..J m <! " - w z ..J f- ..J 'Jl a: m m fl"I ,·., 1T1 I 0 ti"l hl If"\ "' I' ,:, ' ' (ll r.J ,,-, f11 m en m m J .A l[J t[i u-i ((1 ,-.-, ,,-, 10 V 0 tfl 1,·, li"l ~- 1 I sJ <:f" 1,·, 11·-,,;:., ro m m m rn m l II, 1.i) ,.r, ..... ,.,.., •.:,-• I (._""I 1..-1 I 1.1·1 lJ""l ["I.J 1 ., ,.,.., I ,_;,, "Q ,:::-, I I •3• I I () ,::, t"· I U'.1 fJ.l ,:::;. •.:•• m r---m m ru ro n, IT· n• rn ,,:_. () ci (· ,:, 0 .-, · 1 ,}, ' 1 ' f,I n ,r . .,., -J ·T ti""l h, m Cf( P• m rr1 m :r; n· m 0 ,:, 0 C• 0 O O O O C• C, 0 0 •:• t,) '0 0 r~ 0 ln ~ sJ •· f1"1 I· q t•I n, I· ,_:) '1 ,:1 r.') (·· ~ :-.: ~ :,· .:<-~ .... , ...... ' ................... ry, ,-.. r.• r., r,, ,.. .. ,1 n, EEEEEEf E E E 0 0 ,::-, \.. LL C £ L (.) fj u :.: ~ '-' '- r,.] ry 0' c, O• E E E E ro ,:-c, "" ,,. ,--:-, f:c{~E E E E f ~ E E E [ :,_._,::,....,_::-, 0 n•~~n~~mvo ~m•~~ mromromrommmrovC0G·D•u, ooocoooooooooonoo 00 0 O O O O \J O O O O r_:, '=' t.) 0 0 •-f• •.::-· •.£, ·r· ,,:, •.t· ·:.::, ------ I I I KEYSTONE ENV!R(:•~!ME~ITAL RES0tJpr:ES -==------------------------------------------=---= •ABLE 2: SUMMARY OF ORC•AN IC COMPOUND'S ===========-----=--===================-'AMPLE # ---------RN8000r57 I I I IN,S<:,006,3 I I I RNe.,:_,oor-:,9 I I RSLT.LNE ----------------------------2,3,5,6Tet-Cl-phet7O1 2,4,6Tr1cn1c,rop11er101 2,4-Dict1iorooner101 2,4-Dimetny1·pneno1 2,4-Dinitropne11c,1 2-cn I c)ropneno 1 2-~.J it r,:,i::neno 1 4,-~-[-in1tro-o-cr~3,)I ~-Nitropneno1 41::t; 1 c,ro3_r."le t ny ! 9n8'no I .Pentact11.1,r◄)~•ne11,,1 .'pneno 1 2.3,5,0T~t-ci-p~eno1 2,4.0Tric/ll•:•r,:,pt7~•10I 2,4-0i,:t,!(1ropnet1()1 2-4-Dimetn~·1011~no: . . 2.4-01rlit~1)0het1QI• ;=-•::n 11:>;-0-.:,n~~,o 2-N t r.rc,-c,r:.,eri,·.-.1 4,0-O,!ii:~~-,)-:~~3~1 4-~·i i r. ror,t·1et·,o t .:1.,~:n 1-:>ro2.met,·1y; ein-::·"'o 1 •oe11~~c-11·0ropne~01 191· e~1,) I 2.3 s,-0T~~-c1-pne~,: 1 2.4,0Tr:cn10r<:,01,~~01 ~,4-DiCr!oropner101 2.4-0ime:11~:ot,et1(:,1 2.4-D1rit(,)C•·1eriO! 2.-c\·1 1 or-·:,c111-=no 1 <70 0 :. 70 0 .. ::.::; . ,) -: 3:'·. ,) { ,') . ,j .0 ::.s •) r,:, ,:, 70.0 ?.5 ,:, ,7 1 ,:, . 7(• . 1:• . 7(,. (, .. 3::, :::s. c, '7,.) 0 ".:,::: 1) :.-:, ,) ·' 7(, 70 ,:, '. ·:::~ ,:, -: ,.~ --l.:',(· --:0 C, .._. "7(• ,:, ::: c.·, . () 70 0 '.:35 Ci : 5 . Pi=OC,1 . .1,:EO ,)N 1·1;1,;·•/8r-) AT 13:~5 ------==~~===~=----------------L. 1 u ~ :~OURCE 81-1.5-3 91-~ 5-3 81-i.5-3 e.1-1.s-.:: Bi-1.S-3 91-1.5-,: 31-·\.5-3 31-~.5-3 a, -·1 . s-·::: 3 1 - 1 ~ -·3 91.:.1 :i-::;, 8 , -•, . 5 -:?,' a,-11 5-13 81--11.=,-12 3 1 -·1 1 •:,-1 :3 81-11.5-1"3 s1-1-1 s-·13 51-·11.:',-13 31-·11.s-1·3 ~-1-11 :,-1'?, -3 ·I -·I ':, -1 3 ::'·l-·11 .5-·13 ~ ., _. 1 i 5 --1 ?, " . , s1-.1 =-,-·t"3J .73 .'.:. -1 82-1 82-1 3.'.-. 3:~-1 ::< ,:. -32-·I 5 -:C :, -3 =· -3 =-.-:, :. -: •. -':I :, -;: 11 2-1-J i tr•:·,r=,n~no i 4,6-0i:1it~o-0-sreso1 4-N it r,:,pt1eno 1 4Chtor~3met11y!pheno1 oentacn1oropneno1 Pt1eno 1 2.3,5,6Tet-(:!-pher101 2,4.0Tricn1or(>Phen0 2,4-0iCtllOropnetlOi 2,4-Dimetnvtc1her101 2,4-0ir1·trc1oner101 2-Ctl I (>~c;i;:1ti1=".n•:1 I "7(, 0 . :'•) C, 1 ..l(iG :~0 2 i?-~ .; ~ - 1 !=-,?:-1 52-1 ~ -~ --, ;-:. -: =--3 ~ ., JNs,:,0070 I I I 2-i,J it r,:iot1t:no 1 4.(5-0initro--:,-,:r~so: 4-N i tr,:,pt1en,.:, 1 ,ac~1oro3meti1y1ot,e!"'C>I Pentacn:oropneno1 011eno t . :· r::-, 70. . 7 ,:, r_, : .. : 0 ~.'5 70.0 ::-=. :IS 0 7(:. Ci ,·70. 0 , ~4 •.) i00 "5 ·~· :' l'-\tlo•,e results ar·e r ·::r.1t:, r ted ,11 uc:1~:q. ~--·:, 1, --.) ~ -?. =-: --:0 :, -•;) 8 -: -· .... ~. --~i a 2 -7 :: -... -. s .. :::--:o =·-·~, 3:?-"7 :,-:1 8.~-7 5-·,, 32-7.5-½• 82-7 5-·) 3~-7 =•-'-) 82-7. s-·:, ~-----e.:c-7 s -,;,, B2-7. 5-9--· C•AC-.E ===-=:::::;::::: - rt D U l:> U1 .:::; 111 0 ro J .:; ~11 '.) r1, l ,_;:, ·111. C, lll CJ l :J 0 --z (C, ,}, 0 0 ✓ • .t> t> rv r,1 r-w ru r,J ru ru I I I z ~ z O ~ ~ ::, t> W I -:J I I I no ...... QOCI.J',Ul --; -l (:, -· -i 0 ::, 0 , .:::; 3 0 """\ ~ o 0 o -· ro:; -· ~ :;n::;7_'1 •ti """\ 11! 3 ·::,,,:-JO::i1ll rt ,-, 0 lll """\ JO :; ,-1 ,:., < " I 0 0 0 c, J D ·o """\ -111.:::;.:::;,::;1 .:::; 11• lll 1) 0 ()::,_:;33 :::.; ,-• 7 ,,., 0 :J .J < ,~ C, I () ::, -0 ·-· I n C• ,:, 11' ,ll ·:'.'• -J .... -.. J ~l ,_,; 1_,, .J l_,_I -.} ·J 0 , .. ) 1Jl O () ti! •fl O IJ1 1.11 ,) C• .. -- - :0 z (0 G;, 0 0 ·.J 1_,.) r, l!!l!!!I !!!!!I 1111!1 z (0 (}, 0 0 --l ra -l)-z I }> co :,: G, n o r 01m ✓ UUP..t,.t,ru1·,) l'J ;,J ,\J ru rv c· o t, '-' .J:.. r,J 1,) r-v 1u r,J 111 ru u ·o t, .t> i:, rv·'.IU rv ru ru ftJ rv lJ (JJ r ---1 :J (JI () I I J 111 (1 I I I 3 111 \-.I I I I ro :r .:::; z ,}, z ~-.1 -t-::. i:-i:-. '-'-' a• :; ::; z ,_,., z ,~, ••"-•wm:J:JZ~Z•>••••~ :J ,-, I I I I ::, , ... 3 I I J ,-, I -· J I ! I ,)tlJO,-,O,-, o c• o ._ .. a:.r1 _ .. ._, ,1, ,_.:, ,_, a .1 oa □ ~o~ nOM 0001-~ CJ ·, """\ --~ c, - :JO()J fJj O 0 ,:, 03JnJ,:,r1-1 , o ~, m 3 , ::; o ~ ,1 0 rt::,◊ 3 (~ ~ < ·, -I O:J(,1,-:,::,r_\ 3 < & 0 ~ 0 0 l ~ l ~ 3 .:::; _ n .:, .-o ~11 r:o o •.• ,., .... ::; O 3 -.:; 'j C, -· ._, 0 (, - -I 1 (l, i_ll i::,C,3,-, o ~ ::, o ::. ro o < , OJO .JO J < 0 ◊ ~ 0 0 l ::; _,.., 0 :.; ,., c, ' Jl 1Jl .-, lllJ:}"I') _j ([t 111 0 0 ::, :, :J ,_) ,:, ._, l\l :,_1 t• t, i/1 Ci -:-• 3 ::; -~ ctJ ro -::, ,-1 ::; 1J -:, ,:, :J < ll _j ·c, 0 :-'.i ,~ --. c, n::, I_J , 111 ::, .,:, j 11) -j -j CJ Lll """\ :., 0 _:; ,-, I I O J 0 •:•-OJ,:1 0"i •.1• J J O t ::; (l1 ill O O -:::• ::; ::. J:; •-• () <ll ill ::; ::; 0 0 hJ (_II •~·, -.J ··I iJJ (11 ·.J •:,_1 1_,_1 -.J -] _;·, .J;, .. _; --.J -.J 1_,1 .,, ·J •'.•.' ,_,_, -.J -.J ·-l --1 ;_,_:. ·J -.) •~•/ t\J --1 ,_,.:, ,_.._1 -J -..] .(-> •JI C• () ;_!] l_f\ C1 1_1\ '.11 1) •:, •.I\ 1_1] _, :_11 LI\ C1 •.'I . I! 0 0 _-_,, Ul (l O (.II (I\ ,_:, 1_1\ (.I\ 0 (', C> 0 ·:> c, 0 r z m OJ ij) ij) I'-I> I'- ill UJ IJJ Lll IU ,u .i:.r~.f.•~.µi~ ill n1 ill lU W 11J !.LJ :.11 '-' t• i,. r-.. t:, ~ f. t, tJ/ UJ IU 1.U -l-> ~ le-t, (n W /!J IU UJ 1.1) ;_u lLI iD uJ fD (D W (0 (D fJJ fO OJ (D W Ill (0 ~~•WW01,,wWWw O•WWwWWWWWW cowmmrn (tj '" •J (,.) w I I I I I I I I (.II f.JI Ul ,_11 f)l r.11 1..tl \h. '-" t_r1 I , I, ':· ·~-· .:.. •.•l (JI '.•1 ; JI 1 1 I I I \ I ,_:, ,_,1 •.I\ !JI I.I\ I I I I I I t I I I I I I I. I I I I I :.::, .•J ,:;, ·t• •.-: • --::-, ·::· i• •.[• 0 ,:.:-, '-'1 l.."I ._11 I ,:_; t) I I I 000..:1000 ll'I Ul ll\ 0 I l I (Jl U1 Ui ll\ Ul t/1 U1 Ul ._11 I I I I I I I I IJJ (.iJ ~I\, ~'•J U1 Ul U1 -:.,1 Ul Ul lJl Ul U1 U1 \J ',) IJ.I W liiiiil }> ij) r II m II II rl.l II II II t(J II C II ::; II .,; II }> II l) II -< II II Q II "'1 II II Q II :0 II CJ II }> II Z II II C., II II () II 0 II 3: II D II 0 II C II Z II 0 11 IJJ II II II II 'I] II lJ ti 1-, u CJ II C II ,~1 11 rn 0 0 z I ,.::, II ·, \J (0 II ,j, II II }> u ·-I II u •• 11 ,,-, II II r,J II Ul II D II :P ti 1;) II /fl II " II 11 ru -· - II II II II II II II II II 11 ;,<;: II m II -< II IJ) II ---1 II 0 II Z II m " II m II Z II < II II :.U ll C) II Z II ~ II m II Z II ---1 II }> II r II JJ 11 rn 11 IJ°J II •.) u C II II II JJ () m ,,, - --- - - - 11!!1 :o- 7 =iii ~. p CT '·' < :ll z ,;J ·" 0 0 • I .r, (i) z ,:o ,]', 0 0 ·J z l> (0 ~ •.3'1 u o r o rn "" LO # rr D 'o .P. ~ p hJ f,J 10 ru ru ru r-.> o u .P. .P -t--ru l•J r,, r,J 1u r0 rJ u ·o .µ t. r:, f,J !iJ l•J rv 1,J f•J lu ·lJ '1.' .:,. P +' (,J f,j f•J fl.) IU fl.) fl> .J ,]I 1'":1 I I I JJ (I) r -1 •Jl Ji0,_-)1 ,_ C) I lll ':i :J Z \), Z 1:.1 t:-.i., .P. (u 3 ,-t I -:,:; I I I -, 0 o, .:,, rt O r-i C CJ 0 ::i (D .P.Wtll::i ::; z ,::,-, ? C1 ..J rt I ,'.), l..fl C, [II C, ,-t Q i(), -, l I I "i ,➔ I - 1) 'J O (>, I fl ·~· G1 0 ,.... 0 ,.... ·l ,-. -, l -, 3 I• I 1,) CJ ,:,, - ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 Z C, Z 0 P ~ ~ ~ W I J ,-; I -· ::::; I I I fJ t), l_f\ •) !JI C• rt Q rt O Q Q '-'' Ul -1 -1 (ll _Ol> ·;C, -~ o 0 ~ 0 , ~ J n -, ~ 3·, C, ,:, .J ··1 :::, -1 n ., ._,, 3 CJ ., ,_;':-i :::::; o 0 ~ o , :; 3 n , ~ -. ,., ro Ct ::, C w O -0 (• -· 11:; ~ 0 3 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~, n ~ ~ , ~ ro ro ~ -, ~ o :J M V HJ 0 ::0 tb O < l ' -r:, :J ,_, _j ,:, • .,:, 0 () ::, '< ,. :'> 0 C• :; .~ '' a 1_, .J :J O I ::, 11' {11 0 :'J (_, J ::, ·-• C• W c, 1.::, ,:, rt ::; 0 111 __ , -, 1-J ,1, 0 3 ::; 1· a1 111 -, ,11 .:, ~, -' ,:, ::} .-, C, rt t)::, J •") :::', t{I •.) <_ J < ,1''. ::,1 0 0 :J .~ ::, 0 C• ' ,_, - ,11 J ~-,:,;i ·-' ,11 (1) ,:J ,:0 ,:, _j _, C, •.) J ' l1• ([l _, ,.) ,) ,.:, W 0 D 0 1~ 3 ---1 0 ~:; ,➔ 3 (\ ,➔ 11 ~ ~Jilt (U 3, ~ 0 3 •.) . rl ..... , •.) J llJ ·' ,_:, ::::; < ,D :i 0 ,:, _:, :l I .,:-, .3 0 '•' ,:::, _, .. , •':• ,-,, I J 3 •JI ill .:; :; C, (, '·" ~ O DO --~ ~ -· ~ ,j]Jrt"::i('irt("f 0111 7' ill 1]1 -, (JI J l ::; Ci :::::; rt 0 rt JO:illl()"<l I ry· :; ,:. :; ., .~ ::, 0 0 :::, •• :l () ,.) ·-· ::; ·0 ·-· :'J ,, o o n ::; ::; 0 ,.) •.::-• r,1 1.,..1 --l -J ,:~1 , .... -.J •.i •.1• -.J --1 i_1j uJ ,1} -.:i -l ,J:, ._._, -.. J :_v ,.,j ... J -J r11 ,_,.1 -.J •.J uJ iJ) • l ,_,_, ,:,,_, -.. J --l ,_,_, ,_;, •JJ •-l -.J 1JJ ,.,_, -.J (,·, 1_l1 G• --J -Ll'I· ,:_11 0 0 i_rJ u, 0 i_fJ I.'\ 0 0 !I\ •C• JI ..::1 C, Ul f,IJ t,) (II (.IJ O O (u (fl (Jl ,:) ') ll\ _II ,:1 .:_., (IJ O O --1 .• _, r_lj .::, 0 (.IJ lf\ 0 f)I ._I\ 0 •.:'IC•OO•J00 .:, 0 ·.:::, c, 0 0 0 ,.., 0 c, 0 0 -, (_'.0()0 ,:,O(.lOOOOO 0 r z rn ;nwmcor:oo1 ,J,, ,_}, ,: .. 11/ lU !TI ,j, .,; ,.ii LJJ d. \U ,j] UJ ID ;}I 1_1\ ')I IJ1 •.II :_fl UJ I ,o Ill m Ill Lfl 'JI lfl Ul I < m 111 1D m m m m m m w cu l_fl 01 Lfl (JJ l'I Ul •.fl Lil 1_1\ (JI (.fl I I I I I I I ID {D I •JI U1 Lfl I 1_1 I' I I ,- .·.11 '. '1 ,_IL ll\ ,_n IJt ._11 1_11 .:, I UJ IJJ ·.) fJI ,JI (.II IJJ Vl (JI !JI t.'l (_IJ •.fl 111 ._11 ,) J ,_11 ,,1 VI l'• I I •J..I (.,j 1.J..; ,r, •~ ·V \f• •0 •.f• •0 •.£• I I I en l/1 r.n lfl VI LI\ 0000000000001 I I I I f_,J. 1..U f_,j 1.J..I 1.,J •JJ lJI ~ U1 UI UI (Jl UI l,I\ UI {J\ U\ Lil -,) ' \,.,'. J UJ LI\ 01 (_fl UI l_l'l I I I I· I UJ (JJ Ii) (_0 IJJ IJJ ) :o C, '" ~ II l> II ffi II r II rn II II II II (i) II C II :;: II :;: II l> II J) II -( II II 0 II "'l II II Q II J) II Gl II l> II Z II II () II II () :: ~ II 'O II Q u C " z " 0 u (fJ " II " u 1) II ,~, II (J u C u ,-, 11 rn u r:,.1 II " " ,) z " ' " ~ ·0 u (0 II ,J, " " p " .; " " II ,_,j II II hl II 1}\ 11 IJ II t, 11 1:;'1 II /11 II II II II t_,_1 " " II " II "' rn < u, -1 0 z ' rn II II rn II Z " < II 1) ,-, z :;: rn z .; l> r ,1J ,n 1f1 0 II C II :U u n II nl II •Ji II II II II " -:,, 0 ,:, "' ill - - - - J_l z co ... , 0 0 ,:n ru --111!!!1 l!!!!!!I JJ L. :·u 0 0 ,:0 -~ z (O (>', 0 0 (J) 0 lilllil liiil J) I (1) z r :,, OJ s ,.}, u o r o rn -~ .,,01"#; ,--tUU~.J:> Ul:5Cb01 -t> r0 1 ,1 ru ru 1u ru ru I I G•ZCJ.P.~.P.P.(U I -· :, J I I lJ 1), i:, .p. :::J (ll, 0 I (p' ::::;• ::::i z J,., P. r,J f,i ru Id M ru ru u ·o J::. -t> t:. ru r,J ru ru nJ l•J ru iJ u .P .i,. .P ru · r,1 ro ru ru r,.i°"ru I :; \11 CJ I I 1 • J 1'\I O I I I .(TJ.J::iZ !.ll ~ ,-t •3• Z (1 t:. ~ J... P. 1,.1 11), J ::, Z ,_~. Z C, ~ .P -t> ._. U..1 11' J _, Z ,}, Z 1-:, .t,. -t> .i., .t• W I rt Cl CJ --. , -:.J I I I ::J .·1 I ::J I I I :1 ,--, I -· ::J I I I l ,::;, UJ (• ,-1 Cl,-t IJOQ•3"•frl ,:) O> 0 .... r:i 1:1 r:i :s, ,:11 -.• n, •j n CJ ,--, ·-o o a ·-"· u1 t.) o, o rt o ..... a o o u, (.II •• ::; -l ,:-,,·:;3c,,u, 1,_1 0 0 •.• -t'D :; -· -i 0 3 ~,.... 3 0 ~1 rt G ~ ~ ~ ~ •b ~, 3 0 3 ,-t 0 ,-r :; D _-, .:, ::; < '" ::i "0 () ::, ,,. ,) .J 11, 0 < -, I I •.) :; Ci •.) 0 () 0 I n "' (1) iJ) (,, •-•:J"OOl Ill ::i J 0 I .J (\1 (ll ·o 0 () -..:, :; 3 ::::, ,11 tll ,:, ,) ~ 0 -I 0 , ··1 -·, 0 -· ---· ~ ~, ~ ., 0 -i .::J O O J ,:, ..... w 0 0 3 ::::, ,.... :::; 7) fT .-, -j n lll ' ,0 0 ro ~, •~ ~ 3 0 ~ ..... ,-t ::i () J ([1 (• < :;01,):.0 ' -I J < 0 •J J Q (S 1 ~ I ro ~ 3 0 l ::::; 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ::::, , •• •.•.' ['i ;:; •~• -· l11 ::J c,3:;,-,:;0,-1,-, -I -~. i~ ~ -, •D 1 3 0 3 rl o ~ 3 o ~ ro 0 < , ,:; ::; ,:,, ::; '-,1, :'.i 0 ,::, :, ,, :, 0 1 ,:·, ~ 0 C, (:, -:; '1• 0 0 -, :::; ::; ,) I __, (l, tll Jj Ci () -' .J a) ,) -:::; .J fD •.lJ :) .J ,:, •.) ..::. 0 0 :; ,J1::;3t1,,_,, 0 ,) -· (ti ::; -. --f .:, 3 _::, , ltl tll nJOnr1 OlD -,(ti::;,3,:,3,-, o ,-, ~ o ~ ro o < , - IJ _, 0 ~ 7.) 0 J 1.lt :, 0 l(•JCi ,:,,C,,.J 0 I .-, "' '1• •Jl 0 o ::. ·o c, , lll3J•JI ..J ID lll l'.) 0 ,:, :; J ::; ::; (1) (1) C• C• .., ::; C) 0 1i.) •_11 i\J ,"'-. •.\I lu f•J ••. I .--::;, .i> i_\_l -..J -.) IIJ IJ,J ,J l_ll (11 • J -.\ •:> ,::_, l,IJ ...J ...J (.l) (,j .j 1_,J 1,t_l ,I ·.J f.J ;·u ,_._, ·,l -.J !'-' 1.o.• --l (\_1 f.,J -J -..J •Si f,; 0 (I l•J ru Cf\ ,:) 0 (_II (.f\ 0 I.fl rn 0 0 l,tJ ([J 1),} -.} ~J l.lJ (,J -.j IV (,_i -J ..J (II O O UI lf\ 0 L'l 01 0 0 ~! Ul 1.,IJ Q O 1_11 •.f\ (, ,-_11 r.f\ 0 0 I f\ (.f\ Ci O (_II ,Jt O Lil (JI w m ,::o (0 I I 0 ._, 0 c, 0 0 0 ,:, ,_:) (1 1U (ii ;_ll ;11 ,0 ;jj llJ ,li IJJ Ill ,u UJ (fl rJJ Ul •ll ,J) ,o. •:O •u 1.0 ,1.: ,J1 ,-,, •J'I :u ,J, fu :.li :l, ,), ,u ,f1 tu I I I t I I I. I 'I' I I I I ,::, •(• -:::-•f• ·!.• I I -~· uJ /IJ IJJ (() I ,n ru 0 I 0 0000000,:,c.,o 111 ,u JU i_ll tli !IJ ,'.fl {U m (lJ iil W UJ W UJ ~u ,u --l ,J ·J -.J -.J -..J ....J ...J -.1 ...J ,} .J -J -J -..J I I I I I I IJJ(U(Il(DIIJWW -.J -J -..] .... ) ·J -,} ·.} I I 0•01,00000om,00wwwww I ,I I I I 1 l I .. , () ' I ,-__11 Ui •_II •.'I •-__11 l_f\ •_II •.'1 (ll ,_r, ,-_.\ -'=" .f'.> p. -'=" .to l•J ,_.J I I _,. _,. w ,'.Jj w [ I I ,. ,. ... co IJJ -J -J I I IJJ IJJ I I .. _,. 0 0 0 ,_, ,:) 0 ,.) I I I I I ,:, •:1 ,_:) C• 0 0 oooooc, 1,_I 1'.,_I, ,jj . •.• I oJ_I l_oJ 1.J._I 1,J I.\_I IJ_I Lfl (JI L'l VI U'I 01 VI (JI (.I\ 1_11 1._ll (JI I_IJ f_ll l..'l fJI Ul UI lf\ Ul l!l UI Ul I r z rn JJ ,, rn ~ II :,, II CO II r II m II 11 ru II II II i{J II C II s II s II :,, II J] II -< II II 0 II "'1 II II Q II J] II CJ II :,, II Z II II () II II () 11 Q II => II U II 0 II C II Z II Q 11 (fl II II II II U II 11 II Q u r:, II C II n 11 rn II 0 II II () II 2: II II - II - II '· II -ti •:) II '-11 Ill II 61 II II )> II ·1 II - II (lJ II 11 ru II i.Jl II U II p II CJ II [Tl II II . " " .. II II II II II II II II II II ;,<; rr rn II -< II (fJ rr -; II Q rr z II [Tl II II [Tl II Z II < II rr JJ 11 0 rr z rr s II m II Z rr -l II :,, II r II rr 11 rr rn H t)) ll 1,d II ,_ u :n II ,") n m 11 ,Jj rr II II II l!l!!!I l!!!!!!!!!I 1!11!!1 --fiilll lliliiil liiiiil liiiil iiiil -:t; 0 0 <:: '" ,, z ,:0 ,]l 0 () co .J.1 z (0 ,JI 0 "' '-' :o z 0 0 •J.1 " .lJ I U"i Z I l> ,; u "' •JI o r o,m ,:0 ' "' ,..... u 1J J.. s:. .;,. 1,J r,J 1-,) I\J rJ ru lo.) u ·u .P. i-.i:-r,, ru 1,j r,J 1,1 r ... ILi 0 lJ .l;:. ::; (ti l_-1 ~ i.,. 1,:. ru ;f;) f•J 1•l r,:i ru u TJ\ ~ t> ~ !d r\l r,1 ru ru ro r,) JJ O) r -i UIJ1llt_-_1I 11 -•:J(D() I I I • I I I ::; ·(ll' ,-, l I ~:, 3 z 0, ,-. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ 3 Z 0· Z 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ w 111 .. • I Z ,;, Z ,-, -1-'> .i.. ~ -t-> i_,_1 l[l _, J .:.. ,J;, Z ('i -1-'> .J::> -1-'> .P (1) (11 ::::::; ,-t I ::, 1 I I :J rt I -· _} I I .J' rt I 1 I I J ,-; I -· 3 I I I -, ,:, !J.I O r• ,:-1 ,..... Q O I.J ,J, r_l) 0 (.LI 0 rt Q n 1:1 n rJ ,:,, ,_., ,_:-, •j1 ,.:, ,-i : _ _1 r.J 1:, (1 ,_-:., LI\ c, ui ,_:;, ,--, \J n a O rJ ,_,, '.JI lll -, ·, "i --. I ,,:, -· -1 0 "l .., . ..,, ,:, ---i ·-· r• ::::::; 0 0 3 ·~ ., 3 3 0, 0 ~ 0 0 ~ w -~ -D 0 ~:I-·~ WU -,-, •.) -t{I J - 3 ~ ,·t ~ ,-t M Oro Q 3 3 rl ~(~rt rt 1") i(I ..,, ,:, ::;· ,-t I •ll lll ., lD J I J ,:-, :I r-t l ill tD '.J , ill •) n 3 :, 1(1 ,:__, ·< l I •) r1 :, ,) ::, tll ' 0 _j C• ·-• .:.i ·o ,.::, 0 l·• 0 :; C• "J < -· v J 0 D ., ~ IP ~ 3 0 ~ n 1~ 3 l1' ~ O G (,::::::; -, 0 J:; 3::::::; --:\I 1[1 -,:, 11• tll '" ..J ,') ·~· .:. ,.::, ,,, ,-, :., =· 11• ,:11 (i ::, ,:, .J _, j -:; ._, ,:, 111 i[I l_,_1 l) ~~::;, .. 30 -, ,1, 1[1 "\ ,[I :., 1_11· l•l ,,, ::; -.:.• ,-, ' ,,, 1,11 , . :.:; ,_) _, ,-1 -' ··' 0 r:, 11'.1 3 .J :"[I ,[1 0 "f) J ::5 lll ill • ..J :-, ,) Loj 0 3 ::; ·, 1lt ,11 C• 0 --,11 7_~ n, ,-t '"' ::; ·--; llt :i l C, ::;-,--t ,...., -:, 1) .J ltl C, -< 1 -' 0J•.:• O_j 0 ·-,:, >J :-:r O 1) ' --< _, ,_] •:•, :, '" _j ,) d.t J ::J J ,1, ,]) ,.)::;::,-:;::; 0 0 ,ll ctr :::, ·::; 0 r.) I\J 01 :_,i -1 -..J ,,. ,,, -.J 'J.t ,__._, ·I -] 1_1, l•l , .... 1 ·.] ..... J (,J 1.,J -.J 1.J.1 ,,._, --J --l u1 1;"1 1_,_1 -.J _,I ,_,_1 1_11 ,_ll '·'·' 1.i --1 -I 1__,_, f,1 1 11.1 -I -.J (u ,_,, , .... , ,_\, IJ_, -.J --1 •:Z• ,], •.11 0 ,J 1:1 •.JI IJI HJ O Q ·J {l\ 0 0 (,.fl 01 l_lo l}I O (1 (,_t f fl Q O (.fl LIi ._,, l_tl LI\ C, (J '.fl ,_\, l/1 0 0 t.fl (./\ •~ •JI l'"I O 0 0 00000 ,:, ,::, C• •:) ...:, 0 c, 0 0 11) W ;JJ (LI ,lJ 111 ,J.J LU ID fll UJ lll :j' UJ 1n W J: l. 1.l! .'1,1 ·ii ..... l1l ill _jl I_U :Jt IJt ,_U Lil •LI lD Ill tll ,n m JD fl) IJI Ul rn ll.1 ITJ tu m w Ill tu ,::, '-l• ,:;., ,:;, •{• ,:_:, ,_;;, ·(• •!• ,,:-, ·~·· •0 t) ,:-, , __ ._, ,) ,:_, (\ (, ,:, l I I I I I I I l I I: I 1:1 ,) .-:.,, ,_.,, C, ' ' ' ' ' ··-• •t• -~ .,-. •!1· ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... t-. .f.;. ,_ 1\1 I•) foJ l•l ;·,1 j,J f,i l•,' ;11 1<J I•• 1,:, I I I I •JI L'I , .. 11 I.', •JI --I, I (,J (,j •.v I ''-' '-· t . .i,. µ j' I I VJ Ul VI LI\ fJI l/1 'Ji L•l-t..11 U1 ( 'I lJ1 ,.11 ,.-1 ,_,, ,_., ,_,. ,_., o c,, r, ' 0000000001 I I I I IO I I I I ,.:.. ,J, (i,, .J, ,_-., ,j, ,j, ,j, ,], ,5, C,, ,5, ._;, ,_"';, f_lJ, Lil, IJI Lil Ul (Jl l'l )\ LI\, UI \' \ Lfl !JI l/1 ._) \ r z m ~ II l> II aJ II r II m II II hl II n II (fl II C II ~ II -"' II l> II JJ II -< II II Q II '] II II Q u JJ II G) II l> II Z II II lJ II II 0 II Q II 3; II U II Q II ,_ u z 0 II u·, II II II U II JJ u 0 II Q II ' II I") u n1 II I.J II n - II' II n ' n 1.0 II ,_,, n u ► -i Ii IJJ II II [,.) II L•l u u ' :i, II 1;, um II " II II U'l II II II II II II II II II II 7-- 11 m II -< II (fl II -j II 0 II 2 II m II II m II Z II < II II II n II u JJ 0 z ,; m z --i ► r .lJ n, tfJ ,,:i :u ,-, '" ,JJ --- - - JJ z '" ,J, 0 ··u U ~ .i:-t. ru I.J l·,J r.J ru 1u N u u t> .:,. -11!!!!!1 j_l z ,o 0 0 ,o ,:r, 111!!!1 0 0 ,o co ~. Z I J.> (0 5 G• U o r O 1r1 (0 __, * ~ ru 1,.1 r,J 1u r,., ru ru 1J ·u po .f:. t. ru 1,J r,J II) f,J 1u roJ u u P .f'. i, rJ· r,J ft.I, ru rv M ru ~:::;~n, r ,_ :::;~nr I -~:i 1.1'1 Ci I -I l • :J tlt n I I ~ 2 11 -~ ~ ~ ~ i1) ro ~ ~ Z 0 1 Z 0 ~ ~ b ~ ~ i~ J :::i Z G Z 0·~ ~ ~ ~ W :0 iJ, r -; ro ~ ~ Z ~ Z 0 ~ P b ~ W ~ ~ 3 Z 0,-::-irt t·-JIII :Jrt I :J l I I .J ,·t 1 :J I I ::I rt I -· :, I I I CJ Cl I_J ,3, Ul C, (l1 C, rt O rt O O O ,}, Lil () 11.r O .--, 0 ,-, ·LJ O O ,]', l 1l ,oc.uOrtO,-, OOQ0',t110UJO,-,Ort -I c, , "'I -""'I --! c, ' l "'I ,:) -~ 0 , --! 0 , 1 :::; 0 ~ 0 -~ 3 0 ~ 0, ::; ,_, 0 _, 0 ,.::,3c,,,::., .~ -, :::i ,:, C, ::. ._, , J ::S .-. '"' ,3, ,~ 0 .-, rt rt ..::; •-• ..::; (ll ,:, < ""'I ,_, ::; ,) -; CJ l'D :; :-} 1(1 dJ :; ~ ·-· ._, ~ O i) ::, ,".,j Ci 0 3 :::i '"' :; Lll lll , ,11 J "\ (., rt ::, ,-:., :J ([• 0 '1 ·r:., C, _, ,D :::; ,:, ,-, :::; ~j •l: ,.11 ,_, ,_; ,:, ·-' ::; :.; ,_,,:. il, 1(, i"J ::; ry ..... ..-i ,1, 5 -, 3 ,:, J ,-t ,·, _.:; ,~, :.J ill ,_:, ·' ·> ::;-~· j ;11 111 ;_-. C, (,:, u _, 0 0 4 iJ tll f_i 3 --:, ,.., .J ry ,-t ,-t i f{J •.11 , 111 3 (.1 ' ,-, i -I C• C• 1-, 0 __ , ,;, ' V ,:;, .J ·~ < I ,::, ':i 0 ,.:., ,·, ,::,,3,:,,:J-. '" ::; :::; ,.:, I J•"llLltl'.)(} ,_:,:;-5:3:J •. :, () ([I tlt •0 IIJ l•.1 ~ r,J •.[• u.• f•J ·"" ,.,.1 -.J -...) 1.l• ,,:_, ,_._. '-'J -.J 1_1) .r,. ,_., --1 -J •J) 1,·1 ;_11 •IJ 1,1 · 1 --l ,_r: · ·. (,j -J -I •u ,_., (,_1 '·'-' -I 1,1 .;, ~-1 •.1.• -..J ,) 1:.J (l' 1_,j 1_1_1 --.J --J L'l _J.., f_'l ,:_. 0 ftl 1_11 .:., (_fl lll Ci Q lfl O ,.:1 L'I 1.11 •£• ('I (.II C.1 0 ...J IU l_'l 0.:• 'C, .. 11 1.'1 i..fl 1_11 0 •'•' flJ f.Jl O O Cll 1_11 •[• r.11 01 C• 0 oo.:ioc, 0 1._J (., 0 r z rn :U W OJ 1.0 1.U Ill l}l ,fl ,U i.ll Ill If, IJJ ;{; IJI ::! :!! .Jl ,II ,(I !TI •fl •u ;u u, !;J IJJ j\J UJ LU UJ ill QI U) /JI IJ) (D W f1J 11J lD UJ fl]I ;J_, Ill ID UJ I IJ) I '' l•l ,fu r,) l"•J• I•• i•; 1,J 111 111 1,; !•i 1,1 !•J itJ l•i r,_; 1,1 r,i I I I I I , r I, r •.•i HI •_II ,·I 0 0 0 0 ' r 1,, ru I•) ,,, ..:. ,__.. 1 r r ,·:, <::-• •'.) •f• •\• ,;,, ·{°1 ,:;-, ·0 ·~·· r r 1 -l..ll 1_11 ...:,;..__,v,JUO'-")Ol..1000 I l, IIJ •'I ••I •JI ··•1 ,- 1 o,J l_oJ 1.tJ 1_,J lo_l id ,_,J 1,_1 IJJ •JJ i,_i L.'1 (JI 1.11 I ti I.'\ •.11 UI •~•1 Ut <.II ' V . J \ Lil 1_11 .. ) l.l\'. !JI! •.'1 _; •JI l•l iJI Ul • ) J !_Ii UI 1_11 l_'l 1_11 r.ri: •Jl _,. I ,;:.. l.11 •Jl UI r r , I I r vl 1_,J l_oJ, 1_,j f.1.) IJ..I IJ.} ~ rr :,, rr OJ rr r rr rn rr II flJ rr rr II iJ, II C II 3: II 3: II J> :0 -< 0 ,, 0 :n G) II J> II Z II II lJ II II 1J II Q rr :,:: rr 1J IL Q II C rr z II 0 II ff) rr rr II II 1) II 11 II ,---• u r~ II C \I ,-1 rn II r:J •.J ii z. rr rr " II ' II •[• I ' (0 ,}, p -\ 1_._1 II D II l> II C.I II /TI II II II u ,3, --. -... rr II rr II II II II II II II ~ II fTI II -< II if/ II -; II 0 II Z II fTI II II In II Z II < II II :IJ II Q II Z II 3: rn II Z rr -; II J> II r· II II 1J 11 ffl 11 IJ°J II 0 II u J_l II ,··1 II Ill II 111 rr II II II " II ==-===--====-==--------------=-==-================ IABLE 2, SUMMARY OF ORGANIC COMPOUNC,S ===========-----------==--------------- I I I I I I I I I I I RSLT LNE 2.3,5,•~Tet-c1-c,ne~(•I 2.4,6T~icl~toroc11en01 2,4-Oict,10r~>onenoi 2,4-Dimetriy1_on~•101 2·,4-t;1r,_itroot,~not 2-1:li I or-,:,:;:it1,:-:,,) I 2-N i t r,:,otien,) 1 4-N it roµiier-,c,; 4(:htC•~03M~tt1v1011~n0; Pentact·11 ·.:-r(-:::•n-=n•> i 'Pt1et1,) I --3,5,0Tet-•:i-C•l~e~0l 2,a,0Tr.cn!s~0c,1e~,:,, ::::.a-C>i;:n101-oc,11en-11 2.4-0imett~•1!~•1~n,:,1 ~-4-C1i•~itro0t,~11,: ~ -(·ti I•:, :--oc,•1-::-~-.. :, ! '.::-Ni tr•)(•:·:e1·:•) i ~-:~1,:,~c-3m~t11~;~~,~~(·; Per1t,=."1c~1: ,),-,:,i::•r1~1:..:); Pt1o5~1,:, ! 2,3.S,GTet-•:1-0t~~n-:· 2,4,0Tri,:t1!,)i-i)~!7~1,,:,! ~.4-0i,:h!or,:,c,t1e11,:,1 2.4-0i~~tllYiCll~tl•~ :::: . 4-D 1 --, : t .-,:,c•r·•en,: 2-Ct7 I i:,-•)::.1·,':.°'l(·: 2.-r-i i r:. r,:,~1r1en,:, a,,5-Oinit~o-0-cre~•:,1 4-N it rop11en•) i 4Cn1oro3metny1~t1~nc,1 ,Pen_tacn 1-orc,pnen,:i 1 Pt1eno 1 2,3,5,6Tet~(:1-pt:~110: 2,4.~Trich10rOOl7~~-)1 2,4-0ict11oropne1101 2,4-Dimett1v1ot1~t~,)= 2,4-Dirl1t(,)pt1erl()I 2-,::t111) r(:,pn-:n,:i l 2-r,1 1 t ror,:,t1en,:i 1 4,6-Ginitr0-(,-•:re30! 4-N i r. ropner,l) 1 4Cl1!or03metn·,1~1,e:1oi pent~1:n1oro~•i1er101 Pt1e:10 I < '70. G .:---:r:.,. 0 < ::·=· 0 3-':"-~ :.::. (· •70.0 :: = •' .. 3 ': 70.0 .. .:t:.-. •) .:;oo\1e resu1ts ar~ repori:.e(j ir1 L:91;.:_g I 81 3-1 3 1 3-1 9 1 ?-1 B 1 :> e, =·- s 1 3-' :, -:3 =· -3 5-3 5-'3 8~3-1.~-3 3;·3-1 ':--? 9 1 ·3-1 5 -:3 s·, 3-: :--3' _9, 3-1. 3-3) e 1 :: -,;:, -1 ,:, . 5 a ·1 3 --;-- 1 ,'".J s ~ ·1 ::: -,:, -'. ,j ~ '. ·3-,~•-I') 5 1 ,:, • -, '-4 5-4 :-4 ':· -4 -".!-~ :-c. =-~J.-2 ~--4 -~ '! i -:, ~ , .;,\.-~-. 3 ·1 4-:'· a:c.-s :·--1 5i4-5 :-7 e•i.:.-s ::.-7 ':: 1 .:a.-5. ': -7 s,i.:.-~, :-7 B14-5.o-7 8 t4-S. '.:,-7 814-5.5-7 I.: . ' I KEYSTC1NE ENV ! F1)NMENTAL RE·;ouRCE·~ ===============--=--------=================----=== ,:~==-= ~ _ :u~~~~ -~: = ~:~:~~: _ ::'~:~~~i==---ORODLJi:ED ON 11/10/8•5 AT 13:25 . ----------===========-=-----·~AMPLE # IN.960095 I I I rN3•c,0096 I I RSLT.LNE ----------------------------------------2,3,5.6Tet-•:1-pnen01 2., 4, 1~,Tr i cn 1-.:i(op•1en<:i i 2,4-Dicn1oroot1~~01 2,4-Oimett1v1pne1101 2,4-0i11itropt1e~0: ,2-ct1 ! oroi:it1eno 1 2-N i t·roo11~no l a,0-Oinitro-0-cre~oi "4-N it r-)!=dlen•) ! acn1oro3m!tt1v1011en0i PentaCt11()fOOl~~!l(,I -pr1en•:,, 2,3,5.15T~t-•:1-o~~t~Oi 2,4,0Tr1c1~1oroot,~n<)1 2,4-Di•:n1oroon~•101 2,4-Dimett1v1one,1,~1 2, 4-'D in.•: :•)pr-1e:-i•:• 1 12-Ct1 1 (,ro~•nerio: 2-N; r_ roeine'.-it:) 1 4,5-C>,rlitro-0-·:r~S(·' 4-N it ropt1,en,:; ! 4Cnloro31ne:nv1~111~!1,: i'P~nte.cti l 0:'"<):'.:1/1-0::n,::, l .ot,en•.:) 1 ✓-70. 0 ·70. ') 35,0 ?':· .' 7•J. 0 :44 ·35 O t;'..'3} 7t:, . 0 ,3 i. 3 ·35 0 715 :::--:, 4 ' ·:'-. 7,) . ') ,:··35 0 ·35. •.j . 7(1 . ,:, 4 l,:J ?-:"· 0 7 ,:i ·) , 7(, t) ' 3~. •,) 2·:-,4 ~ ,,, 1 I £1..b•:)11-=: r·-:: ~-u t ,: $ .3 re r· e 01:, r t. "= ,:-J 1 ·1 ,_J •:) . ' ~'. ,~, . I I I I I I I I ·=-OURCE 915-4.5-6 815-4.5-6 815-4 S-6 815-4 3-0 815-4.5-6 a{S-4.5~~ 915-4.5-6 ✓ 515-4 5-0 815-4.~-~ ~. a1S-4.5-6 81=,-4.5-:-.6 9·15-4.':,-t:i 91:',-9-1C• :", 8 1-:--.... ~-·1,). =· = 1 s-•;,-1 o.:: 3 ·\ 5 -.;, --1 0 . 5 5 I ~--'~1 -1 l) . 5 3 1.:·-~,--,0. s 8 ~ :.-.;.;-1 0. ,5 °?-i 5 -·:::' -I O . 5 / / 31:-;1-10 :, 3 ., 5 -'~• - 1 ,) . 3 ·I:,--,~~--1 i), : ' / -· 3 I 5--~•-1 •') .-5-::" DA<3E 8 ========= iiiil • liiil Q,, " " iiiil liiil PROPERTY BOUNDARY liiil liiil liiil liiil liiil liiil iiiil SCALE (FEET} 100 100 200 300 liiil liiil iiiil liiil liiil 0 CEHETARY~ w-,+ FISURE 1 J,IELl LOCATION HAP RALEIGH/HORRISVILLE, KOPPERS COMPANY, me. iiiil liiiil SAMPLE ~ 1---------N860002 RN860003 -N860004 N860005 N860006 RN860007 IN860008 N860009 RN860010 I I I I I I I I I I I I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10,36 PAGE SOURCE DESCRIPT DATE-COL DATE-REC --------------------------------------------------- \I/ELL M\11-4 MONITORING \1/E L LS 09/09/86 09/10/86 \1/E LL M\11-6 MONITORING WELLS 09/09/86 09/10/86 \1/E LL M\11-7 MONITORING WELLS 09/09/86 09/10/86 \1/E LL M\11-8 MONITORING WELLS 09/09/86 09/10/86 \I/ELL M\11-10 MONITORING \1/E LL S 09/09/86 09/10/86 \1/E LL M\11-11 MONITORING WELLS 09/09/96 09/10/86 WELL M\11-12 MONITORING \1/E L LS 09/09/86 09/10/86 \1/E LL FB MONITORING WELLS 09/09/86 09/10/86 \1/E LL TB MONITORING WELLS 09/09/86 09/10/86 m· ' m KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES =•••••••••••====z==•==••••••=••••=••==•=•••••••••• TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10:41 PAGE· 1····•=••=••············-···•===•=•=•=•== ==•=•===•======~==•========== ======== SAMPLE# RSLT.LNE SOURCE 1--------------------------------------------------CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ---------------RN860002 COD (Total), mg/L: 40.0 IRN860003 RN.860004 RN86000:5 RN860006 IRN860007 RN860008 RN860009 COD <Total>, mg/L·: 50.0 COD ( TO ta I > , mg/ L : < 1 0 . 0 coo <Total>, mg/L: 50.0 coo <Total>, mg/L: 35.0 coo (Total>, mg/L: 40.0 coo <Total>, mg/L: 20.0 coo ( TO ta I > , mg/ L: < 1 0. 0 I CONDUCTIVITY · RN860002 cona. ,umnos/cm RN860003 cona. ,umnos/cm II RN860004 cona. , umnos/cm IIRN860005 cona. ,umnos/cm 1508 1796 1778 RN860006 cona. ,umnos/cm 951 990 1200 1 185 0.00 o. oo· RN860007 II RN960008 II RN860009 RN9600 1 0 . I PHENOL RN860002 RN860003 cona. , umnos/cm cona. , umnos/cm cona. ,umnos/cm cona. , umnos/cm Pneno I mg/L: Phenol mg/L: IRN860004 Pnenol mg/L: RN860005 Phenol mg/L: RNS60006 Pnenol mg/L: 0.005 0.006 0.005 0.005 (0.005 0 . 0 1 1 <0.005 <0.005 R~860007 Phenol mg/L: DRN960008 Phenol mg/L: RN860009 Pnenol mg/L: TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON H RN960003 TOC, mg/L: 3.85 RN860006 TOC, mg/L: 3. 15 RN860008 TOC, mg/L: 3.74 I RN860004 TOC, mg/L: 4.70 RN860002 TOC, mg/L: 5.47 RN860007 TOC, mg/L: 6. 19 RN960005 TOC, mg/L: 9. 17 I RN860009 TOC, mg/L: < 1. 00 pH RN860002 PH, un ts 8. 1 I RN860003 PH, un ts 7.4 RN860004 PH, un ts 7.7 RN860005 PH, un ts 7. 1 D RN860006 PH, un ts 6.4 RN860007 pH, un ts 7.7 RN860008 PH, uni ts 7.5 RN860009 PH, uni ts 7.3 I RNS60010 PH, uni ts 7.8 I WELL MW-4 WELL MW-6 WELL MW-7 WELL MW-8 WELL MW-10 WELL MW-11 WELL MW-12 WELL FB . 'I WELL MW-4 ~;f· WELL MW-6 WELL MW-7 WELL MW-8 WELL MW-10 WELL MW-11 WELL MW-12 WELL FB WELL TB WELL MW-4 \I/ELL M\11-6 \I/ELL MW-7 \I/ELL M\11-8 \I/ELL M\11-10 \I/ELL M\11-11 \I/ELL M\11-12 \1/E LL FB WELL MW-6 WELL M\11-10 \I/ELL MW-12 WELL M\11-7 WELL M\11-4 \I/ELL M\11-11 \1/E LL M\11-8 WELL FB WELL M\11-4 \I/ELL MW-6 \I/ELL MW-7 WELL MW-8 WELL MW-10 WELL MW-11 \I/ELL MW-12 \I/ELL FB \I/ELL TB KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES · •ABLE 1: SUIYMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10:41 l======~=·s•=•a••••••••a•=•============== =======•=•==•===============• PAGE 2 SAMPLE >It ASL T. LNE SOURCE 1--------- TOTAL DISSOVLED SOLIDS ~ RN860002 N860003 N860004 RNB60005 mg/L, mg/L, mg/L, TDS @103 TDS @103 TDS @103 C C C 947 1133 1320 675 635 1020 WELL WELL WELL < M\1/-4 )\ll f'7 I MW-6 M\1/-7 I N860006 N860007 AN860008 rN860009 I I I I I I I I I I I mg/L, mg/L, mg/L, mg/L, mg/L, TDS @103 TDS @ 163 TDS @103 TDS @103 TDS @103 C C C C C 870 38.0 \I/ELL WELL WELL WELL \1/E LL MW-8 MW-10 MW-11 M\IJ-12 FB I I 'AMPLE .to ---------CHLORIDE RN860002 IN860003 N860004 RN860005 IJN860006 N860007 RN860008 IEN860009 LUORIDE N860002 RN860003 INB60004 N860005 RN860006 llt860007 NB60008 RN860009 f ITRATE · N860002 NB60003 RN960004 ltNB60005 N960006 RNB60007 IFNB60009 NB60009 NITRITE tNS60002 N860003 N960004 RNB60005 lt860006 NB60007 RN860008 IN860009 ULFATE RN860002 EN860003 NB60004 NB60005 RN860006 tN860007 NB6000B RN860009 I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10:41 PAGE 1 m•aam:iaaa RSLT. LNE SOURCE ------------------------------------------------------- cn1oriae, mg/L: 136 \I/ELL M\1/-4 cn1oriae, mg/L: 330 \1/E LL M\1/-6 Chloride, mg/L: 253 \1/E LL M\1/-7 cn1oriae, mg/L: 68.0 \I/ELL M\1/-8 cn1oriae, mg/L: 126 \I/ELL M\1/-10 tn 1or i ae, mg/L: 97.0 \1/E LL M\1/-1 1 cn1oriae, mg/L: 107 \1/E LL M\1/-12 cn1oriae, mg/L: < 1 . 00 \1/E LL FB F1uorioe, mg/L: 0.610 \1/E LL M\1/-4 Fluoriae, mg/L: 0.500 \1/E LL M\1/-6 Fluoride, mg/L: 0.520 \1/E LL M\1/-7 Fluoriae, mg/L: 0.290 WELL MW-8 Fluoriae, mg/L: 0 .310 WELL M\1/-10 Fluor i ae. mg/L: 0.680 WELL M\1/-1 1 Fluoride, mg/L: 0 540 WELL M\1/-12 Fluoriae, mg/L: 0 ~ 1 1 0 WELL FB Nitrate as N, mg/L: <0.100 WELL M\1/-4 Nit.rate as N, mg/L: .<0.100 WELL M\1/-6 Nitrate as N' mg/L: <0. 100 WELL M\1/-7 Nitrate as N, mg/L: < 0. 1 00 WELL M\11-8 Nitrate as N, mg/L: < 0. 1 00 \I/ELL M\1/-10 Nitrate as N • mg/L: < 0. 100 11/E LL M\1/-1 1 Nitrate as N, mg/L: < 0 . 1 00 WELL MW-12 Nitrate as N, mg/L: < 0. 1 00 WELL FB Nitrite as N, mg/L: <0.010 WELL MW-4 Nitrite as N, mg/L: <0.010 WELL MW-6 Nitrite as N, mg/L: (0.010 WELL M\1/-7 Nitrite as N, mg/L: (0.010 WELL MW-8 Nitrite as N • mg/L: <0.010 WELL MW-10 Nitrite a5 N • mg/L: <0.010 WELL M\1/-11 Nitrite as N, mg/L: <0.010 WELL M\&1-12 Nitrite as N, mg/L: <0.010 WELL FB SUifate, mg/L: 24.7 WELL M\1/-4 Sulfate, mg/L: (10.0 WELL M\1/-6 Sulfate, mg/L: · (10.0 \1/E LL M\1/-7 Sulfate, mg/L: <10.0 WELL MW-B sulfate, mg/L: < 10. 0 WELL M\1/-10 SUifate, mg/L: 153 \1/E LL M\1/-11 sulfate, mg/L: 45.5 WELL M\1/-12 Sulfate, mg/L: <10.0 11/E LL FB SAMPLE* 1------.--- RSEN IC RN860002 ' N860003 N860004 N860005 RN860006 lt N860007 N860008 RN860009 lf'N8600l0 fFALCIUM RN860002 ~ N860003 N860004 N860005 RNS60006 ~NS60007 flqNS60008 RN860009 lf'lN8600l0 IFHROMIUM RN860002 tRN860003 N860004 NS60005 RN860006 IRNS60007 RNS60008 RN860009 DRN8600l0 MAGNESIUM RN860002 RN860003 nRN860004 HRN860005 RN860006 IRN860007 RN860009 RN860009 IRNS60010 6 R I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10:47 PAGE RSL T. LNE SOURCE ------------------------------------------------------- Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 \I/ELL M\11-4 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 \1/E LL M\1/-6 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 \1/E LL M\11-7 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 \I/ELL M\1/-9 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 \1/E LL M\11-10 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 \I/ELL M\11-1 1 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 \1/E LL M\11-12 Arsenic, mg/L: 0.011 \1/E LL F'S Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 \1/E LL TB ca1c ·um, mg/L: 25.5 \1/E LL M\11-4 Cale um, mg/L: 57.9 \1/E LL MW-6 Cale um, mg/L: 50.4 \1/E LL M\11-7 Cale um, mg/L: 41 . 0 \I/ELL MW-9 ca1c um, mg/L: 53.3 \1/E LL M\11-10 Cale um, • mg/L: 45.4 \1/E LL M\11-11 . ca1c um, mg/L: 36.7 \1/E LL M\1/-12 Cale ium, mg/L: < 1 . 00 \I/ELL F'B Calcium, mg/L: < I . 00 \1/E LL TB cnrom i um, mg/L: <0.050 \1/E LL M\11-4 cnromium, mg/L: (0.050 \I/ELL MW-6 cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 \1/E LL M\11-7 Chromium, mg/L: (0.050 \1/E LL MW-8 cnro,n:um, mg/L: <0.050 WELL M\11-10 cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 \1/E LL M\11-11 cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 \1/E LL MW-12 cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 \1/E LL F'B cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 \1/E LL TB Magnesium, mg/L: 35.2 \1/E LL M\11-4 Magnesium, mg/L: 53.9 \1/E LL MW-6 Magne5ium, mg/L: 64.9 \1/E LL M\1/-7 Magnesium, mg/L: 31 . 1 \I/ELL M\11-9 Magnesium, mg/L: 38.2 \1/E LL M\11-10 Magnesium, mg/L: 32.4 \1/E LL M\11-I I Magnesium, mg/L: 33.2 \I/ELL M\11-12 Magnesium, mg/L: < 1 . 0 \1/E LL F'S Magnesium, mg/L: (1.0 \1/E LL TB i! KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES I .-2a•==•••••••••••••••••••s••====== ==m=• . SAMPLE~ RSLT.LNE PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10:47 SOURCE I, TABLE 3: SUl>'MARY OF METALS DATA 1-------------------------------------------------- POTASSIUM RN860002 --------------- I RN860003 RN860004 RN860005 RN860006 IRN860007 RN860008 RN860009 II RN860010 IISOO I UM RN860002 IRN860003 RN860004 RN860005 RN860006 IRN860007 RN860008 RN860009 IRN860010 H n I I I I I I I Potassium, Potassium, Potassium, Potassium, Potassium, Potassium, Potassium, Potassium, Potassium, mg/L: mg/L: mg/L: mg/L: mg/L: mg/L: mg/L: mg/L: mg/L: soaium, mg/L: 140 soaium, mg/L: 184 soaium, mg/L: 150 9.85 3.37 7.69 3.30 4.62 7.47 5.48 < 1 . 00 < 1. 00 soaium, mg/L: 53.2 sodium, mg/L: 44.2 soaium. mg/L: 82.0 soaium, •,ng/L: 56.7 soaium, mg/L: < 1 . 00 soaium, mg/L: < 1 . 00 II/ELL M\11-4 IIIE LL M\11-6 II/ELL M\11-7 II/ELL Mlll-8 II/ELL M\11-10 11/E LL MIii-1 1 IIIE LL M\11-12 11/E LL FB 11/E LL TB II/ELL M\11-4 II/ELL Mlll-6 11/E LL M\11-7 11/E LL M\11-S 11/E LL MIii-10 11/E LL M\11-11 11/E LL Mlll-12 11/E LL FB 11/E LL TB PAGE 2 ======-== I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SAMPLE* RSLT.LNE l;~~;~~~;;o~~;~;~-;~-;;;-~;~~;;-~~~---------------- RN860002 Pentacn1oropneno1 57.1 lf'lN860003 rN860004 RN860005 0RN860006 11Fi°N860007 IIRN860008 RN860010 Pentacn1oropneno1 163 Pentacn1oropneno1 Pentacn1oropneno1 Pentacn1oropneno1 Pentacn1oropneno1 Pentacn1oropneno1 Pentacn1oropneno1 < 1. 00 1 1 . 4 71. 2· < 1 . 00 < 1. 00 < 1 . 00 gAoove resu1ts are reportea in Ug/L. I I n I I I I I I I I SOURCE --------------- \I/ELL M\11-4;, \I/ELL M\11-61 .. \1/E LL M\11-7 \1/E LL M\IJ-e: \1/E LL M\11-10 '·. \1/E LL M\11-11 \1/E LL M\11-12 \1/E LL TB SAMPLE# l~;;;;;;-- RNB60003 INB60004 N860005 N860006 RNB60007 I N86000B N860009 RN860010 D I n I I I I I I I I I RSL T. LNE 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1 sopropy I 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/28/86 AT 07:22 PAGE SOURCE Etner,ug/L: {100 WELL MW-4 Etner,ug/L: {100 WELL MW-6 Etner,ug/L: {100 WELL MW-7 Etner,ug/L: < 100 WELL MW-8 Etner,ug/L: < 100 WELL MW-10 Etner,ug/L: (100 WELL MW-11 Etner,ug/L: < 100 WELL MW-12 Etner,ug/L: (100 WELL FB Etner,u9/L: (100 WELL TB ·1 I " KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES ···········•·=•=••••=••=•==•===••==•=====7=•=••== . TA.BLE OF CONTENTS PRODUCED OM 10/24/86 AT 10: 56 I= ••••• -.~.; •• --• ----.-· •••••• ---•=•. = --= ---==== = = =. -= ·11. •= =. = = === = = =• = - SAMPLE • 1---------- RN860035 RN860036 IRN860037 RN860038 RN860039 n I I I u H n I I I I I RN860040 SOURCE --------------- \I/ELL MIii-1 \1/E LL M\11-2 \1/E LL M\11-3 \1/E LL M\11-5 \I/ELL M\/J-9 FB DESCRIPT DATE-COL DATE-REC ------------------------------------ MONITORING \I/EL LS 09/10/86 09/11/86 MONITORING \I/EL LS 09/10/86 09/11/86 MONITORING \1/E LL S 09/10/86 09/11/86 MONITORING WELLS 09/10/86 09/11/86 MONITORING \I/ELLS 09/10/86 09/11/86 MONITORING WELLS 09/10/86 09/11/86 PAGE ===zi==== I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10,57 PAGE ISAMPLE * RSLT.LNE . -------------------------------------------------- CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND RN860035 COD (Total), mg/L, 50.0 IRNS60036 COD (Total), mg/L, 75.0 RN860037 COD (Total>, mg/L, 20.0 RN860038 COD (Total), mg/L, 52.0 URN860039 COD (Total), mg/L, 15.0 RN860040 -coo < Tota I), CONDUCTIVITY m9/L, <10.0 RNS60035 cone. ,umnos/cm 1580 IRN860036 cone. ,umnos/cm 1350 RN860037 cone. ,umnostcm 750 RN860039 cone. ,umnos/cm 550 IRN860040 cone. ,umnos/cm 0.00 PHENOL RN860035 Pnenol mg/L, <0.005 URN860036 Pneno1 mg/L, <0.005 RN860037 Pner.i? 1 ,:ng/L, ·0.0211 RN860038 Pneno t, mg/L, <0.005 RNS60039 Pneno1, mg/L, <0.005 IRNS60040 Pneno1, mg1L, <0.005 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON RN860035 TOC, mg/L, 10.77 IRNS60036 TOC, RN860037 TOC, mg/L, 5.53 mg/L, 41. 66 RN860038 TOC, mg/L, 4.33 IIRN860039 TOC, mg/L, 4.98 mg/L, 1 . 06 IIRN860040 TOC, TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS RNS60035 IIRN86003<3 IIRN860037 RN860038 IRN860039 RN860040 pH I RN860035 RN860036 RN860037 RNS60039 IRN860040 I I I mg/L, mg/L, mg/L, mg/L, mg/L, mg/L, TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS TDS pH, uni ts pH, units pH, units pH, units pH, units @103 C @103 C @103 C @103 C @103 C @103 C 7. 1 7.5 6.7 7.2 6.3 1000 832 650 975 480 68.0 SOURCE --------------- \I/ELL M\11-1 \I/ELL M\11-2 \1/E LL M\11-3 \1/E LL M\11-5 WELL M\11-9 FB \I/ELL M\11-1 \I/ELL M\11-2 \I/ELL M\11-3. \1/E LL M\11-9 FB \1/E LL M\11-1 WELL M\11-2 \1/E LL M\11-_3 -~ \1/E LL M\11-5 WELL M\11-9 FB \I/ELL M\11-1 \liELL M\11-2 WELL M\11-3 . ...-------- 'IIE LL M\11-5 WELL M\11-9 FB WELL M\11-1 WELL M\11-2 WELL M\11-3 WELL M\11-5 WELL M\11-9 FB \I/ELL MW-1 WELL M\11-2 WELL M\11-3 \1/E LL M\11-9 FB I I IISAMPLE <I 11---------- CHLORIDE RN860035 t N860036 N860037 RN860038 lf"N860039 lf'N860040 FLUORIDE RN860035 IRN860036 RN860037 RN860038 IIRN860039 IRN860040 NITRATE IRN860035 RN860036 RN860037 RN860038 RRN860039 HRN860040 NITRITE IRN860035 RN860036 RN860037 IRN86003,3 RN860039 RN860040 SULFATE IRN860035 RN860036 RN860037 IRN860038 RN860039 RN860040 I I I I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 11:00 PAGE 1 ==-=t==== .. RSL T. LNE SOURCE --------------- cn1oriae, mg/L: 102 WELL M\11-1 cn1oriae, mg/L: 53. 0 WELL M\11-2 cn1oriae, mg/L: 53 .0 WELL M\11-3 cn1oriae, mg/L: 223 WELL M\11-5 cn1oriae, mg/L: 33.0 \I/ELL MW-9 cn1oriae, mg/L: < 1 . 00 FS F 1uor i de, mg/L: 0. 44°0 \I/ELL M\11-1 Fluoriae, mg/L: 0.540 \1/E LL M\11-2 F1uoriae, mg/L: 0,700 WELL M\11-3 Fluoride, mg/L: 0.480 \I/ELL M\11-5 Fluor.ice, mg/L: 0.490 WELL M\11-9 Fluoride, mg/L: 0.350 FB Nitrate a:s N, mg/L: < 0. 100 WELL M\11-1 Nitrate as N, m9/L: < 0. 100 WELL M\11-2 Nitrate as N, mg/L: <0. 100 WELL M\11-3 Nitrate as N, mg/L: < 0 . 100 \1/E LL MW-5 Nitrate as N, mg/L: < 0. 1 00 WELL MW-<? Nitrate as N • m•~/L: <0. 100 FS Nitrite as N, mg/L: <0.010 WELL MW-1 Nitrite. as N, mg/L: <0.010 •,.;ELL M\11-2 Nitrite as N, mg/L: (0.010 \I/ELL MW-3 Nitrite as N, mt;i/L: <0.010 \I/ELL M\11-5 Nitrite as N, mg/L: <0.010 WELL M\11-9 Nitrite as N, mg/L: <0.010 FB su1fate, m9/L: 27.3 WELL M\11-1 Sulfate, mg/L: 36.8 \I/ELL MW-2 Sulfate, m,;J/L: 22.7 WELL M\11-3 SUifate, mg/L: 23,0 \1/E LL M\11-5 su1fate, mg/L: 30,6 WELL M\11-9 SUifate, mg/L: 15,8 FB I I SAMPLE* l;;;~~~--- RN960035 IN860036 N960037 N960039 RN960039 I N960040 ALCIUM RN960035 I N960036 N860037 RN960039 l:'!N960039 N960040 HROMIUM RN860035 ltN860036 itNS60037 RN860038 IN860039 N860040 AGNES I UM i N860035 N860036 N860037 RN860038 I N860039 N860040 POTASSIUM ~ N660035 N86Q0:36 N860037 RN860038 I N860039' N860040 SODIUM i):,NS60035 lisN860036 RN860037 lfN860038 rN860039 RN860040 I I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10:59 PAGE :a:a=:11:11==• RSL T. LNE SOURCE --------------- Ar3enic, mg/L: <0.010 \I/ELL M\11-1 Arsenic, mg/L: 0.018 \1/E LL M\11-2 Arsenic, mg/L: (0.010 \1/E LL M\11-3 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 \I/ELL M\11-5 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 \I/ELL M\11-9 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 FB calcium, mg/L: 35.9 \1/E LL M\11-1 Calcium, mg/L: 23.5 \1/E LL M\11-2 Calcium, mg/L: 17.0 \1/E LL M\11-:3 ca1c ;um, mg/L: 46.9 \1/E LL M\11-5 Calcium, mg/L: 22.4 \1/E LL M\11-9 Calcium, mg/L: < 1 . 00 FB cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 \I/ELL M\11-1 cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 \I/ELL M\11-2 cnromium, mg/L: ,-o. 050 \I/ELL MW-3 cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 l<iE LL M\11-5 Chromium, mg/L: <0.050 \I/ELL M\11-9 cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 FB Magnesium, mg/L: 31. 0 \1/E LL M\11-1 Magnesium, mg/L: 26.8 \1/E LL M\11-2 Magnesium, mg/L: 20.4 WELL M\11-3 Magnesium, mg/L: 51. 9 \1/E LL MW-~ Magnesium, mg/L: 9.75 \I/ELL M\11-9 Magnesium, m,;i/L: < 1 . 00 FB Potassium, mg/L: 9.25 \1/E LL M\11-1 Potassium, mg/L: 5.55 \1/E LL M\11-2 Potassium, mg/L: 6. 65 \I/ELL M\11-3 Potassium, mg/L: 9.59 \1/E LL MW-5 Potassium, mg/L: 3.63 \1/E LL M\11-9 Pota55ium, mg/L: < 1 . 00 FB soaium, mg/L: 233 \I/ELL MW-1 Sodium, mg/L: 207 \I/ELL M\11-2 SOdium, mg/L: 149 \I/ELL M\11-3 SOOium, mg/L: 180 WELL M\11-5 SOdium, mg/L: 56.8 \1/E LL MW-9 SOOium, mg/L: < 1 . 00 FB I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 11:01 SAMPLE~ RSLT.LNE SOURCE 1;~~;~~~;;0;~;~;:-;~-;;;-~;~~;~-~~~---------------- RN860035 Pentacn1oropneno1 <1.00/ - N. 860036 P.entacn Io ropneno 1 < 1 . oo N~60037 Pentacn1oropneno1 5.85 N86003B Pentacn I oropneno 1 : -411 RNB60039 Pentacn1oropneno1 4.28 IIN860040 Pentacti I oropneno I . 1. 96 lloove results are reportea in ug/L. I I I I u H I I I I I I I WELL M\11-1 \I/ELL \1/E LL \I/ELL -WE L. L FB ~ MW-2 M\li-3,/ Mw-5:?-- M\i/-,,,.(' ' ) PAGE • I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES TABLE 5: SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA lla::z=•••=~•~•••••••••••••••a•••=••=======• PRODUCED ON 10/27/86 AT 12:01 SAMPLE .. RSLT.LNE SOURCE ~~;~;;;;------------------------------------------ RN860036 11:N860037 ll:N860038 RN860039 RN860040 I I I I I u H I I I I I I I 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 Etner,ug/L: (100 Etner,ug/L: < 100 Etner,ug/L: <100 Etner,ug/L: (100 Etner,ug/L: < ·100 Etner,ug/L: <100 ' \I/ELL M\11-1 \1/E LL M\11-2 \1/E LL M\11-3 \I/ELL M\11-5 \1/E LL M\11-9 FB PAGE ===cia::a:a I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES "ABLE OF CONTENTS 11 1 _ c =::1::,.'c:11 •• • :ir •:a••••••••••=-•==: a a a==-:a :::1 = PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10:52 PAGE r=•a-. . SAMPLE ,I It---------N860029 RN860030 ~N860031 N860032 N860033 RN860034 I I n I I I I I I I I I I I SOURCE --------------- \I/ELL \II-1 \1/E LL \11-2 \1/E LL \11-3 WELL \11-4 \I/ELL W-5 \1/E LL \11-14 DESCRIPT DATE-COL DATE-REC ------------------------------------ MONITORING \I/EL LS 09/ 10/,S6 09/11/86 MONITORING \I/ELLS 09/10/86 09/11/86 MONITORING \I/ELLS 09/10/86 09/11/86 MONITORING \I/ELLS 09/10/86 09/11/86 MONIT!)RING WELLS 09/10/86 09/11/86 MONITORING \I/ELLS 09/10/86 09/11/86 I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES SAMPLE* RSLT.LNE l~:;~~~;~-;x~~~~-~~~~~~----------------------------- RN860029 COD (Total), mg/L: <10.0 IRN860030 COD (Total), mg/L: (10.0 RN860031 COD RN860032 COD <Total>, mg/L: (10.0 <Total>, mg/L: -20. 0 RN860033 COD <Total>, mg/L: (10.0 nRN860034 .. COD llcoNDUCT Iv I TY <Total>, mg/L: 25.0 RN860029 II RN860030 II RN860031 RN860032 IRN860033 RN860034 PHENOL RN860029 0RN860030 II RN860031 cone. , umnos/cm cone. , umnos1cm cone. , umnos/cm cone. ,umnos1cm cone. , umnos1cm cone. ,umnos/cm 670 530 520 1000 350 1 130 Pnenol, mg/L: <0.005 Pnenol, mg/L: <0.005 Pneno1, mg/L: <0.005 RNS60032 Pnenol, mg/L: (0.005 (0.005 (0.005 IRNS60033 Pneno 1 , mg/L: RNS60034 Pnenol, mg/L: TOTAL O_RGAN IC CARBON IRN860029 RN860030 RN860031 RN860032 IRN860033 RN860034 TOC, mg/L: TOC, mg/L: TOC, mg/L: TOC, mg/L: TOC, mg/L: TOC, mg/L: < 1 . 00 < 1 . 00 < 1 . 00 1 . 65 < 1 . 00 2.00 TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS IRN860029 RN860030 RN860031 I RN860032 RN860033 RN860034 pH I RN860029 RN860030 RN860031 I RN860032 RN860033 RN860034 I I I mg/L, TDS @103 C mg/L, TDS mg/L, TDS mg/L, TDS mg/L, TDS mg/L, TDS pH, uni ts pH, un I ts pH, units pH, units pH, uni ts pH, ·uni ts @103 @103 @103 @103 @103 C C C C C 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.2 7.5 7. 1 386 308 290 630 264 742 SOURCE --------------- \I/ELL \II-1 \1/E LL 111-2 \1/E LL 111-3 \1/E LL 111-4 \I/ELL 111-5 \I/ELL \11-14 \1/E LL \II-1 \I/ELL 111-2 \1/E LL 111-3 \1/E LL \11-4 \1/E LL 111-5 \I/ELL \II-14 \1/E LL Ill-1 \I/ELL 111-2 \1/E LL 111-3 \I/ELL 111-4 \I/ELL \II-5 WELL W-14 \I/ELL \II-1 \I/ELL W-2 ·WELL 111-3 \I/ELL W-4 \1/E LL W-5 \1/E LL W-14 \I/ELL \II-1 WELL 111-2 WELL W-3 WELL IJl-4 \1/E LL W-5 WELL W-14 IJIE LL W-1 IJIEL L IJl-2 \I/ELL 111-3 WELL IJl-4 WELL 111-5 WELL W-14 I I SAMPLE# 1~~;;~~~-- RN860029 ' N860030 N860031 N860032 RN860033 I N860034 LUORIDE RN860029 - N860030 N860031 N860032 tN860033 N860034 ITRATE RN860029 I N860030 N860031 RN860032 - N860033 N860034 !TRITE RN860029 I N860030 N860031 RN860032 lfN860033 lflN860034 SULFATE ' ~ N860029 N860030 N860031 RN860032 lt N860033 N860034 I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10:54 RSLT.LNE ---------------------------------------- cn1or oe, mg/L: cn1or oe, mg/L: cn1or oe, mg/L: cn1or oe, mg/L: 29.0 16.0 23.0 126 cn1or oe, mg/L: 14.0 cn1or oe, mg/L: 141 Fluorioe, mg/L: 0.150 Fluorioe, mg/L: 0.150 Fluori0e, mg/L: 0.310 Fluorioe, mg/L: 0.150 Fluorioe, mg/L: 0.150 Fluorioe, mg/L: 0.400 Nitrate as N, mg/L: Nitrate as N, mg/L: Nitrate as N, mg,~, Nitrate as N, mg/L: Nitrate as N, mg/L: Nitrate as N, mg/L: Nitrite as N, mg/L: Nitrite as N, mg/L: Nitrite as N, mg/L: Nitrite as N, mg/L: Nitrite as N, mg/L: Nitrite as N, mg/L: Sulfate, mg/L: 12.5 Sulfate, mg/L: 23.2 sulfate, mg/L: Sulfate, mg/L: SUifate, rng/L: sulfate, mg/L: 14.6 16.3 1 1 . 9 25.2 < 0 . 1 00 0.254 1. 60 < 0. 100 0.978 < 0 . 1 00 <0.010 <0.010 (0,010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 SOURCE --------------- \I/ELL \11-1 \I/ELL \11-2 \1/E LL \11-3 \1/E LL \11-4 \I/ELL \11-5 \I/ELL \11-14 \1/E LL \II-1 \I/ELL \11-2 \1/E LL \11-3 \I/ELL \11-4 \1/E LL \11-5 \1/E LL \11-14 \1/E LL \11-1 \1/E LL \11-2 \1/E LL \11-3 \1/E LL \11-4 \1/E LL \11-5 \1/E LL \11-14 \1/E LL \11-1 \1/E LL \11-2 \1/E LL W-3 WELL W-4 WELL W-5 WELL W-14 WELL W-1 WELL W-2 WELL W-3 WELL W-4 WELL W-5 WELL W-14 PAGE 1 I I SAMPLE* l;;;;~~~--- RNS60029 IRN860030 RN860031 RN860032 RN860033 IIRN860034 llcALCIUM RN860029 IRN860030 RN860031 RN860032 IRN860033 RN860034 CHROMIUM RN860029 IRN860030 RN860031 RN860032 IRN860033 RN860034 MAGNESIUM IIRN860029 IIRN860030 RN860031 RN860032 IRN860033 RN860034 POTASSIUM I RN860029 RN860030 RN860031 I RN860032 RN860033 RN860034 SODIUM I RN860029 RN860030 RN860031 I RN860032 RN860033 RN860034 I I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES RSL T. LNE Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 Arsenic, mg/L: (0'.010 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 .Arsenic, mg/L: <0.010 calcium, mg/L: 53.0 Cale ium, mg/L: 36. 1 calcium, mg/L: 36.7 Calcium, mg/L: 97.9 calcium, mg/L: 31. 5 Cale ;um, mg/L: 1 17 cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 cnromium, mg/L: ~0.050 cnromium, mg/L: <0.050 cnromium, mg/L: cnromium, mg/L: Magnesium, mg/L: Magnesium, mg/L: Magnesium, mg/L: Magnesium, mg/L: Magnesium, mg/L: Magnesium, m•J/L: Potassium, mg/L: Potassium, mg/L: Potassium, mg/L: Potassium, mg/L: Potassium, mg/L: Potassium, mg/L: <0.050 <0.050 29.4 21. 4 19.9 28.5 14.9 22. 1 1. 90 1. 47 2.03 2.38 2.52 1. 37 SOOium, mg/L: SOOium, mQ/L: soo;um, mg/L: sooium, mg/L: sooium, mg/L: soaium, mg/L: 12.6 13.2 16.0 27.0 15 . 1 24. 1 PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10:55 PAGE SOURCE --------------- \I/ELL \11-1 WELL \11-2 WELL \11-3 \I/ELL \11-4 \1/E LL \11-5 \1/E LL \11~14 \1/E LL \II-1 WELL \11-2 \1/E LL \11-3 \1/E LL \11-4 \1/E LL \11-5 \I/ELL \11-14 WELL \11-1 WELL \11-2 WELL \11-3 WELL \11-4 \I/ELL \11-5 WELL \11-14 WELL \11-1 \I/ELL \11-2 \I/ELL \11-3 WELL \11-4 \I/ELL \11-5 \I/ELL \11-14 \1/E LL \II -1 \1/E LL \11-2 \I/ELL \11-3 \I/ELL \11-4 WELL \11-5 WELL W-14 WELL \II -1 \1/E LL \11-2 \1/E LL \11-3 \I/ELL \11-4 \I/ELL \11-5 WELL \II-14 I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 10:57 PAGE SAMPLE• RSLT.LNE SOURCE l;~~:~:~~;o;:;~~~ ;~-;;;-~;~~,;;-;~~---------------- RN860029 Pentacn1oropneno1· <1.00 rN860030 rN860031 RN860032 Pentacn1oropneno1 Pentacn1oropneno1 Pentacn1oropneno1 < 1 . 00 < 1 . 00 < 1 . 00 RN860033 Pentacn1oropneno1 c1.oo t N860034 Pentacn1oropneno1 <1.00 I I I I I I I I I I H D I oove results are reporteo in ug/L. \I/ELL \11-1 \1/E LL \11-2 \1/E LL \11-3 \I/ELL \11-4 \1/E LL \11-5 \1/E LL \11-14 I I • • SAMPLE # ---------- RN860029 RN860030 IRN860031 RN860032 RN860033 IRN860034 I I I I n n I I I I I RSL T. LNE 1 sopropy I 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/28/86 AT 07, 11 PAGE SOURCE Etner,ug1L, (100 \I/ELL 111-1 Etner,ug/Lc < 100 \I/ELL \11-2 Etner,ug1L, < 100 \I/ELL \11-3 Etner,ug1L, < 100 \I/ELL \11-4 Etner,ug/Lc < 1 00 \I/ELL 111-5 Etner,ug/Lc < 100 \I/ELL W-14 ,I ' ' I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES as===a=•=========•==========c======•============== "ABLE OF CONTENTS PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 11,00 PAGE l=••=•=•===c•=====•=•==••·•-========•=== ===========•================= ======== SAMPLE# SOURCE DESCRIPT t--------------------------------------------N860041 WELL W-6 MONITORING WELLS RN860042 lN860043 N860044 N860045 RN860046 IN860047 N860048 RN860049 I I I I u R I I I I I I I WELL W-7 MONITORING WELLS WELL W-8 MONITORING WELLS WELL W-10 MONITORING WELLS WELL W-12 MONITORING WELLS WELL W-13 MONITORING WELLS WELL W-15 MONITORING WELLS FB MONITORING WELLS TB MONITORING WELLS • DATE-COL DATE-REC ----------------09/11/86 09/12/86 09/ 1 1 /8<:, 09/12/86 0')/ 11 /86 09/ 12/,S6 09/11/86 09/12/86 09/11/86 09/12/86 09/11/85 09/12/85 09/11/86 09/12/86 09/11/85 09/12/85 09/11/86 09/12/86 ,I I , I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES .PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 11:03 l~~~~~~~~-~x::::-~::~~~----------------------------- SOURCE --------------- RN860041 COD (Total J, mg/L: 25.0 IRN860042 COD RN860043 COD RN860044 COD IRN860045 COD RN860046 'COD RN860047 COD RN860048 COD IIRN860049 COD llcoNoucT1v1Tv cTotalJ, <Tota1>, cTotalJ, <Total>, <Total>, CTOtalJ, <Total>, <Total>, mg/L: 15.0 mg/L: 15.0 mg/L: 10.0 mg/L: 15.0 m,;i/L: ·12. 0 mg/L: (10.0 mg/L: <10.0 mg/L: < 10. 0 RN860041 cono. ,umnos;cm 1 100 IRN860042 RN860043 RN860044 . 1RN860045 RN8600'46 RN860047 RN860048 nRN860049 PHENOL RN860041 IRN860042 RNS60043 RNS60044 cona. , umnos 1,:m cono. . L1mnos1cm cono. . L1mnos1cm cona . ,umnos/cm cono. ,umnos/cm cono. ,umnos1cm cono. ,umnos;cm cono. ,umnos1cm Pnenol mg/L: Ptieno I m9 / L : Pnenol mg/L: P11eno 1 mg/L: Pher.c• mg/L: Pnenot mg/L: 750 550 850 500 ' -330 390 < 1 . 00 1. 00 0 .007 <O .005 <O .005 (0,005 <0.005 (0,005 RNS60045 IRN960046 RNS60047 Pnenot mg/L: <0.005 RN860048 Pneno t , m,;i; L: <0.005 <0.005 I R.N860049 Pneno 1 , m,;i / L: TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON RNS60041 TOC, mg/L: 8.63 IRN860042 TOC, mg/L: 2.38 RM860043 TOC, mg/L: 4,94 RM860044 TOC, mg/L: 2. 14 IRNS60045 TOC, mg/L: 1 . 17 RN860046 TOC, mg/L: 1. 39 RN860047 TOC, mg/L: < 1. 00 RN860048 TOC, mg/L: < 1 . 00 I RN860049 TOC, mg/L: < 1 . 00 I I I WELL \1/-6 \I/ELL W-7 WELL 111-8 \I/ELL 111-10 WELL 111-12 \I/ELL \l/~13 \I/ELL W-15 FB TB WELL 111-6 WELL 111-7 WELL 111-8 \I/ELL w-10 WELL w-12 WELL \1/-13 WELL 111-15 FB TB WELL 111-6 ';/ELL 111-7 WELL \1/-9 WELL w-10 WELL \1/-12 WELL W-13 WELL W-15 F8 TS WELL \1/-6 WELL 111-7 \1/E LL W-8 WELL W-10 WELL w-12 WELL 111-13 WELL W-15 FB TB PAGE ' I I , I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 11,03 SAMPLE# RSLT.LNE SOURCE l;;;~~;~;;o~:;;-;;:~~;----------------------------- RN860041 mg/L, TDS @103 C 744 ' N860042 mg/L, TDS @103 C 564 N860043 mg/L, TDS @103 C 408 N860044 mg/L, TDS e{o3 C 604 RN860045 mg/L, TDS @103 C 386 IN860046 mg/L, TDS @103 C 260 N860047 366 mg/L, TDS @103 C RN860048 38.0 mg/L, TDS @103 C 1~860049 RN860041 IN860042 N860043 N860044 RN860045 I N860046 N860047 RN860048 IN860049 I I I n I I I I I mg/L, TDS pH, units pH, uni ts pH, uni ts pH, units pH, uni ts pH, units PH, ·uni t':3 PH, units PH, units @103 C 48.0 7. 1 7.5 7.6 7.2 7.4 7.5 6.5 7.4 7.4 • \I/ELL \11-6 \1/E LL W-7 WELL W-8 WELL \11-10 \1/E LL \11-12 \I/ELL \11-13 WELL \11-15 FB TB \1/E LL \11-6 \1/E LL \11-7 WELL W-8 \I/ELL \11-10 \1/E LL \11-12 \I/ELL \11-13 \I/ELL W-15 FB TB PAGE 2 ======== ,I \ I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 11,05 PAGE SAMPLE >It RSLT.LNE SOURCE •----------------------------------------------------------------- CHLORIDE RNB60041 cn1orioe, mg/L, 126 WELL W-6 IRN860042 cn1orioe, mg/L, 78.0 \1/E LL W-7 RNS60043 cn1orioe, mg/L, 53.0 WELL W-8 RN860044 cn1orioe, m•J/L, 68.0 \I/ELL W-10 RN860045 cn1orioe, mg/Lc 24.0 WELL W-12 IRN860046 -cn1orioe, mg/L, 16.0 \I/ELL \li-13 RN860047 en 1or i oe, mg/L, 19.0 WELL W-15 RN860048 cn1orioe, mg/L, < 1 . 00 F'S IRN860049 cn1orioe, mg/L, < 1 . 00 TB FLUORIDE RN860041 F'luorioe, mg/L, 0.400 WELL W-6 IRN860042 F'luorioe, mg/L, 0.300 WELL W-7 RN860Q43 F'IUOri0e, mg/L, 0.240 WELL W-8 RN860044 F1uorioe, mg/L, 0.230 WELL w-10 IRN860045 F'luoriae, mg/L, 0.200 WELL W-12 RN860046 FI uor i 1::'!, mg/L, 0.280 \liE LL W-13 RN860047 Fluor.ice, mg/L: 0.200 WELL W-15 RNS60048 Fluorid,ei mg/L, 0. 130 F'S IRN860049 F'luorioe, mg/L, 0. 120 TB NITRATE RN860041 Nitrate as N, mg/L, 0. 176 WELL W-6 IRN860042 Nitrate as N, m9 IL , (0, 100 WELL W-7 RNS/30043 Nitrate as N, mg/L, (0. 100 WELL w-s RN860044 Nitrate as N; mg/L, (0. 100 WELL W-10 RN860()45 Nitrate as N, mg/L, 0.330 WELL w-12 IRN860046 Nitrate as N, mg/L, <0. 100 \I/ELL IJ./-13 -RN860047 Nitrate as N, mg/L, 0. 125 11/E LL W-15 RN860048 Nitrate as N, m,J/L, < 0 . 1 00 F'S IRNS60049 Nitrate as N, mg/L, < 0. 100 TS NITRITE RN860041 Nitrite as N' mg/L, <0.010 WELL W-6 IRN860042 Nit r te as N, m91L, <0.010 'JIELL W-7 RN860043 Nit r te as N, mg/L, <0.010 WELL w-s RN860044 Nitr fe as N, mg/L, <0.010 WELL W-10 IRN860045 Nitr te as N' mg/L, <0.010 WELL W-12 RN860046 Ni tr te as N, mg/L, <0.010 WELL W-13 RN860047 Nitr te as N, mg/L, (0.010 WELL W-15 RN860048 Nltr te as N, mg/L, <0.010 F'S I RN860049 Nitrite as N' _mg/L, (0.010 TB SULFATE RN860041 Sulfate, mg/L, 24.8 WELL W-6 I RN860042 SUifate, mg/L, 19.9 WELL W-7 RNS60043 Sulfate, mg/L, 19.3 WELL w-s RN860044 Sulfate, mg/L, 1 S. 1 \I/ELL W-10 RN860045 Sulfate, mg/L, 1 6. 9 WELL IJJ-12 I RN860046 Su I fate, mg/L, 16.7 \I/ELL W-13 RN860047 SUifate, mg/L, 12.2 WELL W-15 RN860048 Sulfate, mg/L, 12.2 F'S I RN860049 sulfate, mg/L, <10.0 TB I \ ' I SAMPLE# 1---------- :0.RSENIC RN860041 IRN860042 FN860043 RN860044 I RN860045 RN860046 RN860047 RN860048 • CALCIUM RN860041 RN860042 IRN860043 RN860044 RN860045 RN860046 IRN860047 RN860048 CHROMIUM IRN860041 RNE60042 RN860043 RN860044 IRN860045 RN860046 RN860047 IRN860048 MAGNESIUM RN860041 IRN860042 RN860043 RN860044 IRN860045 RN860046 RN860047 IRN860048 I I I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 11,05 PAGE RSL T. LNE SOURCE ------------------------------------------------------- Arsenic, mg/L, <o·.010 WELL W-6 Arsenic, mg/L, <0.010 \I/ELL \11-7 Arsenic, mg/L, <0.010 \1/E LL W-8 Arsenic, mg/L, <0.010 WELL W-10 Arsenic, mg/L, <0.010 \I/ELL \11-12 Arsenic, mg/L, (0.010 \I/ELL W-13 Arsenic, m9/L, <0.010 WELL \11-15 Arsenic, mg/L, <0.010 FB ca1c ium, mg/L, 48,9 \1/E LL \11-6 Calcium, mg/L, 34.2 \I/ELL W-7 Calcium, mg/L, 36.5 WELL \11-8 CalciUm, mg/L, 5 1 . 0 WELL w-10 Calcium, mg/L, 60.4 WELL W-12 Calcium, mg/L, 34.7 WELL \11-13 Calcium, mg/L, 37. 1 WELL W-15 ca I c·i um, mg/L, < 1 . 00 FB cnromium, mg/L, (0,050 \1/E LL \11-6 cnrom1um, mg/L, (0.050 \1/E LL \11-7 cnromium, mg/L, (0.050 \1/E LL \11-8 Chromium, m9/L, (0,050 \I/ELL W-10 cnromium, mg/L, (0.050 \I/ELL IJ/-12 cnromium, m•;i/L, <0.050 WELL W-13 cnromium, mg/L, <0.050 WELL W-15 cnromium, mg/L, <0.050 FB Magnesium, mg/L, 32.8 WELL W-6 Magnesium, mg/L, 39.2 \1/E LL lJ,i-7 Magnesium, mg/L, 30.9 WELL W-8 Magnesium, mg/L, 16.6 WELL w-10 Magnesium, mg/L, 20.3 WELL w-12· Magnesium, mg/L, 14.6 \I/ELL W-13 Magnesium, mg/L, 20.6 WELL W-15 Ma,;ines i um, mg/L, ,: 1 . 00 FB ' . ' I liAMPLE # ~;~;;;~~~- RN860041 il"N860042 .,N860043 RN860044 t N860045 N860046 N860047 RN860048 li30DIUM ll=!NS60041 RN860042 lf'<N860043 rN860044 RN860045 t N860046 N860047 N860048 I I I I I I I I I I KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 11:05 PAGE 2 aa•====:111 RSL T. LNE. SOURCE Potassium, mg/L: 3. 12 \I/ELL \11-6 Potassium, mg/L: 5.06 \1/E LL \11-7 Potassium, mg/L: 3.57 \I/ELL \11-8 Potassium, mg/L: 5.82 \1/E LL \11-10 Potassium, mg/L: 2.34 \1/E LL w-12 .Potassium, mg/L: 1. 03 \I/ELL W-13 Potassium, mg/L: 1. 89 WELL \11-15 Potassium, mg/L: < 1 . 00 FB SOOium, mg/L: 71. 7 . \I/ELL W-6 SOOium. mg/L: 59.3 WELL \11-7 SOOium, mg/L: 30.4 WELL \11-8 SOOium, mg/L: 59. 1 \1/E LL W-10 S0Oium, mg/L: 36.7 \I/ELL W-12 SO0ium, mg/L: 12.6 \I/ELL W-13 socJium, mg/L: 9 52 \I/ELL W-15 SOOium, mg/L: <, . -:o FB I I ' . KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES • ABLE 4, SUl\'1MARY OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS PRODUCED ON 10/24/86 AT 11,07 PAGE -=••=o•••••••••••••••============ =•=-•a=-.. ' AMPLE# RSLT.LNE ------------------------------------------------ ENTACHLOROPHENOL BY EPA METHOD 604 _ RN860041 Pentacn I oropneno 1 · C:.-1. 22,' IN860042 Pentacn1oropneno1 :'.37,9 .- N860043 Pentacn1oropneno1 I 5.37 RN960044 Pentacn Io ropneno I ,-:-7 17 IN960045 Pentacn1oropneno1 N860046 Pentacn1oropneno1 N860047 Pentacn1oropneno1 RN.60049 Pentacn1oropneno1 loove results are reportea in I I I I I I I I I I I I '--\ 3. 86 .. 5. 17 .' \ 3. 49 " ··,3. 44 ug / c-. SOURCE \I/ELL \11-6 ,\i/E-LL \11-7 ') \1/E LL \11-8 /.VE.LL \11-10 ·1 \I/ELL w-12 \1/E LL \11-13 \I/ELL \11-15 FB 1.· ' I SAMPLE# l~;;;;~~-- RNae0042 li':NBe0043 li':NS60044 RN860045 EN8'5004e N860047 N860048 RN860049 I I I .1 I I I I I I I I RSL T. LNE 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 -·1 sopropy 1 1sopropy1 1sopropy1 KEYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PRODUCED ON 10/27/86 AT 12:05 PAGE z:===='=<=• SOURCE Etner,ug/L: < 100 \I/ELL 111-e Etner,ug/L: <100 \1/E LL \11-7 Etner,ug/L: (100 \1/E LL \11-8 Etner,ug/L: (100 \I/ELL \11-10 Etner,ug/L: < 100 \I/ELL \11-12 Etner,ug/L: < 100 \I/ELL \11-13 Etner,ug/L: (100 \1/E LL \11-15 Etner,ug/L: (100 FB Etner,ug/L: < 100 TB I 11 11 IJ 11 11 IJ 11 11 11 Ref. 9 Interoffice Correspondence AUG :' ·1 1880 Mr. T. A. Marr To ________________ _ From __ ~_1r_._K_._D_. _H_e_p_n_e_r ______ _ Location __ P_1_· t_t_s_b_u_r_g_h_-_F_P_G _____ _ Sediment anc.l Well Water Subject ______________ _ Samples -Raleigh Plant (823-1716) Location Monroeville -WQE Dat1: __ Au_g_u_s_·t_._2_6_,_1_98_0 ______ _ Five (5) samples of sediment and well water, taken in conjunction with North Carolina State and Federal EPA representatives on Jply 211, HIBO.' ,,ere received by the Water and Wastewater Analysis Laboratory on July 28, 1980 for pentachlorophenol analyses. The attached Table 1 presents laboratory sample numbers, sources of: the samples and pentachlorophenol content.of the water and sediments. Please note the well water results are presented in mg/Liter, while the sediment concentrations are in mg/Kg of dried material. R. D. Hepner RJJll:klf cc: Mr. P. n. Smith Mr. I}. L. Davies Mr. w. J. Baldwin Mr. P. A. Perr 1-lr. J. l~inz Mr. R. Dingman Dr. A. C. Middleton I ·_,.,,,. / I I I! 11 --Lab 10 No. II )--! ~ .) I ,) !M . I I( •)r, ,._ I; -- 1/Y'' '.17 ---- Ii-- ··-II ~j 1r-· II ' I I . // TAllLE l FOREST PRODUCTS GROUP KOPPERS CCMPANY, INC. RALEIGH, NC SAMPLE COJ.JJ•:CTTON DATA Samnle / Date Source .. We I I, ca·st of steel shop ' . ~ledl in well south of pl:mt l~i I kcrson constn1cti on wcl I, cast of plant Sediment -cast discharge point Scd it11c11t -Medlin pond, soi,th or pl ant North Carolina :ind Federal EPA Descriotion / Collected "0.058 mg/L y 7/24/80 <,0.0004 mg/L " <. 0. 0004 mi,:/L " 0.674 mg/Kg " 0.114 mg/Kg " WATER QUALITY ENGINEERING MONROEVILLE RESEARCH CENTER Received 7/28/80 " " " " . , I I II II II Ii II II 11 II Ii Ii Ii II Ii Ii I II To Location Subject Interoffice Correspondence Mr. T. A. Marr From Mr, R, D, Hepner Pittsburgh Location Monroeville Water and Soil Sam11les Date October 29, 1980 Raleigh, NC (823-1716) Water samples from the pond, eight wells, three pits and ·six soil samples .from the pond, collected September 11, 1980,' by Mr. J. B. Gillespie, were received September 16, 1980, by the Water & Waste- water Analysis Laboratory. Ref. 10 Sample Collection Data are presented in Table l, while Table 2 presents a Summary of Analytical Data. All data for water samples are in mgiliter, while results of PCP analyses on the six soil samples from the pond are in mg/Kg on a dry basis. RDH:ss Attachments cc: Mr. P. D. Smith Mr. D. L. Davies Mr. W. J. Baldwin Mr. R. A. Perr Mr. J. Heinz Dr. A. C. Middleton~· Mr. J. A. Quagliotti '"It;;/~~ R. D. Hepner I I I I ab J~e No. Source 1213 Pond Well #6 . 214 1215 Well #9 216 Well #10. C-217 vie 11 #11 218 Well #12 C-219 Well #13 (220 Well #14 Well #15 l,-221 222 PIT-A --223 Pit-G 224 Pit-I 225 Pond Soil -Pond Soi 1 1226 227 Pond Soil r_?'>O Pond Soi 1 ~29 Pond Soil I . ~230 Pond Soi 1 ;-: ' .lectcd by: J. Gillespie I I I #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 TABLE l FOREST PRODUCTS GROUP KOPPERS COMPANY, INC. RALEIGH, NC SAMPLE COLLECTION DATA Sample Date Descrintion Collected 9/11/80. 9/11/80 9/11/80 9/11/80 9/11 /80 9/11 /80 9/11 /80 9/11/80 9/11/80 9/11/80 9/11/80 9/11 /80 9/11/80 9/11/80 9/11 /80 9/11 /80 9/11/80 9/11/80 WATER QUALITY ENGINEERING MONROEVILLE RESEARCH CENTER Received 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 9/16/80 .. I I I 11 ' PARAMETER RNC I Organic Carbon I ,_ D. -5-dav lical Oxygen Demand -1 Oxv2en Demand .,ls I[ r, (os CaC03) to pH= 4.5 M.O. o pH = 8. 3 PHT. ' . in i ty /as CaC09 ) to pH= 8.3 PHT. ~p_H = 4.~ M.O. I E . d ... ~s, •vaporate Tota I -103° C ixed -550• c olatile-550° C ' ws, Suspended \lotal -103° C !ixed -550° C Volatile-550° C [~-Dissolved tal -180° C :,,Fixed ~ 550° C elaUle-550° C I lus, Settleable, ml/L -5 Minutes , Hour >r .. Units l;:tivjty .... 11ml10s/cm i, 11itv, Unit<; r:ldehyde -: f~iiJ 213 6.8 46 <l 35 <0.005 113 145 <0.5 .00056 TABLE 2 FOREST PRODUCTS GROUP KOPPERS COMPANY, INC RALEIGH, NC SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA o,_0 . (, t;..,,J 7 c,u--,/ 0 0 CJ.)• I/ r_,!,i)-1~~ (>LL' ;(3 ,',u,.;/ •./ ' (i,o-/b~ 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 7.4 6.9 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.6 7.4 7.3 43 34 59 36 34 21 27 20 6.0 5.0 3.0 <1 <1 4.0 4.0 <l 35 85 5 1 70 7 <1 <1 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <0.005 <Q.005 <0.005 764 285 471 457 328 207 430 268 ' 800 470 750 780 450 270 600 400 . <0.5 <0.5 <0,5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 /.012-: '--,, -.00059 6.? .': 046"' .00059 .00068 .00052 .001 I 11 rcsults in mg/liter unless otherwise noted._ WATER QUALITY ENGINEER I NG MONROEVILLE RESEARCH CENTER TABLE 2 FOREST PRODUCTS GROUP KOPPERS COMPANY, INC. RALEIGH, NC SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL DATA ~ · <-t·c1 o .,,y ~~-"-,:,,~,. ;/, ! 6 P ,r J. I cl. ~'.: 1./ ···--·· RNC I PARAMETER .--------;----1r---t-----t---t---.Jf--+---i--l---~I----- 222 I -T I I 223 I 224 22s I 226 221 228 229 230 l Orl!a n ic Carbon I .u. -5-dav llcal Oxv~en Demand '-· Oxygen Demand ls 1ity (as to PH= CaC03) 4.5 M.O. 8,3 PHT. IO pH - , inity (as CaCOs) to pH= 8;3 PHT. 10 PH -4.5 M.O. L~\s, Evaporated "otal -103° C llixed -550° C . lo lat ile-550° C rs, Suspended lbtal -103° C ·xed -550° C Volatile-550° .c ~. Diss~lved ._btal -180° c I ix<!cl a·· 550° C olatile-550° c . I / .us, Settlenble, ml L 15 Minutes I Hour I . ,r, Units lttivity . .umhos/cm .. Jit·-. .-. UnitB . '1:ldehyde 2 .0018 .0022 .42 .074 .031 .072 .11 ·. 076) 1,------t---'-------t----t--t----'--l--+---+--+---+----l--- in m!;/liter unless otherwise nuted. 230 -results in mg/Kg (ppm) WATER QUALITY ENGINEERING MONROEVILLE RESEARCH CENTER 11 I 11 i Ir ! 11 11 11 I\ 1, ., 11 -j 11 I: ' 0 W-13 . : ____ _: W-14 0 OW-4 .o W-15 0 0 W-3 OW-9 0 W-1 1-------. : ______ : 0 W-11 0 100' Q MONITORING WELL \ 6 BACKHOE PIT (_1-: ) LOCATION OF POND SEDIMENT SAMPLES AND BACK HOE PITS ~ I' Ii Ii II II II II II II 11 II Ii II IJ 11 II Ii II II II I(.:, l<OPPERS Interoffice Correspondence · To __ _.:.::Mr,_.,.~R::..•_:A.:.:·:.....:...P;::.er,_.,r'-------- Location Pittsburgh From __ -'-'M,._r.,_. __,_R.,_.._,._D._. _._H..,e"'p...ene__,r _____ _ Location •.· .. Monroeyi 11 e Subject --.!.:R~a..,.;l e,:_i~geche--S~o~i,._,l~Sa,.,m"'p:..:.l.:,.e=-s ___ _ (823-1716) Date --' _ _,_M.,,,au.y_7......_. __.l_,_9""80..____· ______ _ fEV.2 Samples of dirt_collected at the Raleigh (Morrisville) Plant on March 19 and Apr.il 3, 1980, have been extracted and analyzed for their pentachlorophenol contents by a gas chromatographic technique. Results are indicated on the attached letters you sent to me indicating sources of the soils. RDH:ss Attachments cc: Mr. W. J. Baldwin Mr. D. L. Davies Mr. T. A. Marr Mr. P. D. Smith Dr. G. Kitazawa Dr. A. C. Middleton.,__...---- Mr. J. Heinz · Mr. R. Dingman i I I I I I! Ii Ii To Location Subject Interoffice Correspondence R. D. Hepner From R. A. Perr Location Pittsburgh MRC Raleigh Samples • Date March 21, 1980 I am having the Raleigh, North Carolina plant send you the-follow:ing:11 samples of dirt.that were taken .March 19, 1980'. ~ /1:'- ,r C/7, ,;,~ /l -~ . . ~i'o ooo ,<2//(.. 79 ),_.__ War_ehouse -Ba 1 -South Side Surface 11 /0' 2 . Ware house -B~t:.;c4,_:-~S~o:c:,u~t~h:.,_!:S~i:.!d~e~S:c:,u=.r..::fc!:a:.::c:.::e:__ _______ <4,.!,i;,~o:c:,o:::._ __ /-/ _ .. 3 .. _-'\:Jarehouse -Bay #7 -Middle Surface 'f/O I'" 4. Warehouse -Bay #1 -South Side Clay Layer .;- II Ii 11 II Ii Ii 11 ' ,rj ·-5. _Warehouse -Bay #4 -South Side Clay Layer .Ji J1/'_6~iw..rehouse -Bay #7 -Middle Clay Layer s~-> rf ;f,,-Lagoon Sludge '\ /.; 0 1 ooo ~c, _8. Dirt near lagoon sludge ) 1, o>,oO J>'/ 9 . Sand Fi 1 ter / k ~o-c Ji .,l_0~Sur face near ol d'_p_e_n_t,,_a-rn'"i•-x-ctc-a_n_k.---,,----------7 J .,;~'.:, o o ,i) 11. . Surface near old cellon building ) J. 900 / . Please analyze these samples to determine if they are contaminated with pentachlorophenol and if so please determine the concentration of the contamination for each sample-. 'Please handle this expeditiously very interested in these results RAP:cg cc·: T. A. Marr P. D. Smith -Raleigh 4 as possible, we are .. ~::;·e:·· Raymond A. Perr l~t,✓ J/.1-?/10 1\~lllC-79'~ f 9 - Ii H(V. 2 II II II II II II II II ll II II II ll II Interoffice Correspondence To R. D. Hepner From_.....;.R"'"';_A_.:.._P_e;:..r..;.r;;;__ _______ _ Location_MR~~C ___________ _ Location Pittsburgh -K-927 Subject Raleigh Samples • Date _ __:A.:.1P:..:r:..:i::.:l=---7'--'-, ..:l::.:9:..:8:..:0:.._ _____ _ In addition to the 11 samples of dirt I had the Raleigh plant send you in the niiddle of March,· I am having them send you the following ,12. samples of dirt that were taken April 3, 1980.: · J:1/C-<j;; 12 Warehouse -Bay #1 So~th Side ; tf3 v·~3-Warehouse B~t2 Center --SsfO ;,;. }_4_~areI:iouse BE:y_jf• . ..;_3'-'?~o"'uc:.ct=,:h~s=i~-~d-e----------'-----"",x~;i'-'o=---- i; 15 Wareh9.11se -Bay #LC""e"'n .. t,.,,e,...r~ _____________ __,.__./c...J<-=.D:.::D:__ fY J._6_]:luried Lagoon -Surface " Jl.70 1.r J..7 Buried Lagoon -1' d~lch·-=----------------·,_/.::SD:=.t....C:..:0:..:0:_ __ ?J J_8_Burie9-Lagoon -2,-depth 7) 19 Lake Bottom at shore W· _2!) New Surface between old penta mix and building 77.21 New Surface between penta mix and road /'" .22_Center 1 Road -near Penta Mix /C/ 23 Rear Building zo I .Joo .l/P..:, J"f 3J, ooo __ _ /.SU Please also analyze these samples to determine if they are contaminated with pentachlorophenol and if so please determine the concentration of the contamination for each-sample. ~~19~·-· Raymond A. Perr RAP:cg cc:·· T.·A. Marr P. D. Smith -Raleigh Ii 1(;t1{-i I I vJ c..s ~ t, (· ,._ ,I' (Jo/~<> II II , REV. 2 . ·. Ref. 12 R{OPPERS Interoffice Correspondence To Mr. R. A. Pe""'r..,_r ________ _ From ___ .Mr.....:__R~ Q _ _Jjepne.L.- It Location Pittsburgh Location Monroev i 11 e I Ii 11 11 It 11 I\ 11 I: Ii 11 11 It ,11 Subject Raleigh Sam._pl_e_s ______ _ -ran:11ro, Date _ ____:A.:.:U:...9c:::U-=-S-=-t-=2'--'l'-',_.:._l ::..:98::..:0:,.._~----- Ref: " -Your letter of,June 30, 1980-regarding 55 dirt samples. Soil samples from various areas of the Raleigh Plant were received July l, 1980, for extraction of pentachlorophenol and analysis of dried extracts. Analysis-was carried out by a derivatization-gas chromato- graphic technique. Identification was made from retention data only. Sources of soil and lake bottoms samples: and penta contents are pre: sented below: A. \•larehou·se ·samplE:s· Lab Sample No. RNC-132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 --8; Ce 11 on Samples Lab Sample No. RNC-140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 . l 53 Your Number l 2 11 . 18 15 28 32 33 Your Number 100 l 01 102 103 98 99 115 113 114 131 , 132 · 125, 126 - 124 PCP, mg/Kg 4 ,ooo-- 1 ,800 2,800 180 310 110 31 780 PCP, mg/Kg_ 230 65 110 120 43 1110 4,700 l ,800 l , l 00 14 3. l 3.2 100 270 I . Ii I, I 11 11 ' 11 11 11 . I 11 11 IJ 11 11 IJ 11 lo I Ii . --..- Mr. R. A. Perr -2- C. ,lake Bottoms Samples Lab Sample No. Your Number RNC-154 155 156 157 141 142 143 144 D .. Lagoon Samples\ Lab Sample No. Your Number RNCc 158 38, 159 39 1 160 40, 161 41 ' 162 46 , 163 4 7 • 164 60 165 61 166 62 167 63 168 64 169 65 170 68 171 69 172 70 17 3 71 174 721 175 73 · 176 74 177 75 178 76 179 77 180 80 1131 Bl 182 88 ~ 183 89 • lM 96 185 97 Note: Results are in mg/Kg dried soil. R. D. Hepner RDH:ss cc: Mr. T. A. Marr Mr. P. D. Smith Mr. W. J. Baldwin Mr. J. Heinz Dr. A. C. Middleton Mr. 0. L. Davies Mr. R. Dingman August 21 , 1980 PCP, mg/Kq 12 6. l 11 20 PCP, mq/Kg 13 13 7.4 0 .Bl 17 43 5,500 220 220,000 38,000 24,000 960 70,000 6,500 450 3.4 160 39 9.4 l.6 64 7.4 6,000 l. 5 170 5.6 3,400 150,000 I·/,, ), ,· 11 11 ! 11 11 11 11 ' 11 11 I I 11 11 IJ 1, 11 IJ 11 I: 11 I ------Ref·; 13. RALEIGH SOIL INVESTIGATION · OLD 1./'GOON-AREA ... , .. Collect samples in each bcring at: 0.5', 1.5', 3', 6' . 0 '}-0 / r ◊ o/ ~ 0 'v 0 y ◊ 0 0\ ◊ 0 0 ~ ◊-"ti 1\ 0 ~) ,t I v ~ Pond ----- 0 Analyze samples at 0.5' and 1.5' "' □ Analyze samples at 0.5', 1.5', 5 1 ·' 6, Analyze samples at 0.5', 1.5', 3', 1 'v ◊ Outline of old lagoons :<·· Scale l" • 40' Ii 11 TABLE 1 FORMER LAGOON SOIL SAMPLES (PENTACHLOROPHENOL RESULTS mg/Kg) 11 RALEIGH, NC JUNE, 1981 11 Location Surface 0-1.0' 1.5-2.5' 3.0-4.0' 6.0-7.0' B-1-A 0.021 0.037 11 B 0.046 0.064 C-~ 0.43· 0.88 0.058 D 0. 26. 0.021 Ii E 10.0 · 0.068 B-2-A 0.048 0.051 B. 390.0 2.8 10.0 11 C 730.0 0.22 I D 1100. 0 0.080 E 190.0 0.60 0.25 11 B-3-A, 0. 20 · 0.048 0. 065° I B· 0.40 1.0 0.25 11 c,' 8100.0 ✓ 7. 7 · 0.43 0.071 D' 0.21 0.076 0.091 E 0.22 0.83 11 B-4-A 900.0 1.8 0.21 0.12 B 0.82 0.15 0.21 0.15 C 1200.0 1300.0 0.67 8. 90 0.10 I/ D 0.13 0.13 57.0 1.0 E 64.0 0.24 0.27 11 _B-5-A 0.13 0.12 0.17 B 830.0 2.5 0.13 0.11 0.15 C 10.0 o. 73 3.8 0.13 D 250.0 0. 78 0.17 0.11 IJ. E 3200.0 2.3 0.085 0.085 B-6-A 0.38 0.42 0.16 11 B 850.0 2.7 0.12 0.43 C 1100. 0 2.7 0.49 1.1 0.14 D 0.38 0.11 4.3 0.11 11 E 460.0 8.5 B-7-A 410.0 0.25 0.36 1. 1 2.9 B 2400.0 3.3 7.8 1.0 ., C 940.0 28.0 3.6 1. 7 D 0.51 0.077 0.37 E 2.5 0.94 11 B-8-A 77 .0 0.12 0.038 B 26.0 0.23 1. 3 0.012 11 C 830.0 26.0 0.16 1. 7 0.0ll D 0.057 0.012 0.02 E 130. 0 2.7 5.1 11 I Ii It Ii Location B-9-A B Ii C D E Ii B-10-A B 11 C D E 111 B-11-A B C 11 D E 11 B-12-A B C D 11 E Ii 11 j ,11 11 11 11 11 JBG:ss 10/4/84 ll 1 TABLE 1 (Cont.) FORMER LAGOON SOIL SAMPLES (PENTACHLOROPBENOL RESULTS mg/Kg) RALEIGH, NC JUNE, 1981 Surface 0-1.0' 1.5-2.5' 3.0-4.0' 35.0 0.032 0.022 5.1 0.034 0.065 0.10 30.0 0.017 71.0 2.1 750.0 3.3 0.072 2.2 2.4 2700.0 0.48 6.0-7.0' 0.025 0.034 0.060 0 .. 026 I: I 11 11 11 Ii 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 IJ 11 I! ' 0 0 .43 0 0 0 0 0 390 0 ., 0 8r, (_g p 0 190 0 . 0 RALEIGH LAGOON AREA Penta Concentrations at the Surface 900 0 0 / --------,loo ' 0 \ \ "' 0 ' 0 Results in mg/Kg JUNE, 1981 410 Q_ 0 830 / ,-. / 0 0 / 0 I 0 "' ~ \ "' , 830/ ' ""-~ 1100 0 , / ------0 -) / --I , ~ -/ 0 0 0 3200 130 0 0 0 0 r" "\) 35 0 0 0 750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 RALEIGH LAGOON AREA Penta Concentrations at a Depth of 3.0 Feet 0 0 / ,...______ 8. cJ ' 0 \ \ "" 0 ' 57 0 ' Results in mg/Kg JUNE, 1981 o_ 0 r--' / / 7.8~ 0 0 / Q I "--.. 1.1, 3.6 ' "'ci\ 0 0 ~ \ I 0, 3.8 r---: , ____ .,; I ' o4.3 ~ _/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 _··o. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ii 11 11 11 It 11 11 11 11 ,1 ,i ~l ~I ~I ~ 111 111 111 ,., 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 2.8 0 0 730 7.7 0 0 · 1100 0 0 0 .. 0 RALEIGH LAGOON AREA Penta Concentrations at a Depth of 0.5 Feet l.8 0 0 ,'"'-,_ 1~0 ' 0 \ \ \,_,, 0 ' 64 0 ' Results in mg/Kg JUNE, 1981 77 0-" 0 0 2.5 r--' 850 ' 2 4 , ooo"--"26-.__ ' 0 / 0 ' I " 0 ', ) I 1-Q,__ ' 2. ~ 940 26 / '---, 0 0 , / -------0 0, , ' ... ___ .,,.I 250 I , ~ _/ () 0 0 2.3 460 2.5 2.7 0 0 0 0 0 5. 1 0 0 30 0 71 0 t'c.1'\) 3.3 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . ·o RALEIGH LAGOON AREA • Penta Concentrations at a Depth of 1.5 Feet Results in mg/Kg JUNE, 1981 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 r-----' / 2.7 I 3.3"" 0 " I , 2-{ 2.8 0 o "--o\ 0 / ----0, --_.) 0 0 8.5 0 0 0 0 5. l 0 0 0 0 0 2. 1 0 1, D I I 1, 1, I I I I. I I I I I I I I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .o 0 0 .. 0 RALEIGH LAGOON AREA Penta Concentrations at a Depth of 6.0 Feet 0 0 I ~----I ' I 0 \ \ \ ' 0 ' 1. 1 0 Results in mg/Kg JUNE, 1981 0 2.9 0 ,,--.. 1 0 0 I " / "" , ------'- ' ---------~ 1. 7 0 / ----!! -I -I , ~ ,/ 0 0 0 0 0 ' '-._ 0 '· i , I , ~, : / 0 0 / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ir j Steel Shop "' 0 0 ' F ' ' •IRRIGATION FIELD BEHIND STEEL SHOP RALEIGH, NC Scale l" = 40' Soil Samples Collected at Surface, 0.5', 1.5-2.5', 3.0-4.0' . JUNE, 1981'' l.F.-1 I F -_2 l.F.-3 I.-F.-4 I.F.-5 .. 100 • I I I TABLE 2 ' 11 SOIL IRRIGATION FIELD 11 JUNE, 1981 ' 11 Pentachloroehenol Deeth Results 11 (ft) mg/kg toi0· 11 I.F.-1 Surface '· . 0-1.0 0.033 1.5-2.5 i:cii,Ji-J 11 3.0-4.0 0.053 11 l.F.-2 Surface 0.061 0-1.0 0.016 I ,---/ ,',, 1 5-2.5 (,2. 0 \, 3.0-4.0 0.033 I.F.-3 Surface (r19)· 0-1.0 0.025 · 1.5-2.5 0.024 3.0-4.0 0.039 I. F. -4 Surface 0.056 0-1.0 0.019 1.5-2.5 .010 3.0-4.0 0.045 I.F.-5 Surface 0.12 0-1.0 0.022 1.5-2.5 0.014 3.0-4.0 0.021 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I To Location Subject KEYSTONE £:-.'\'IROSME:-.T AL RESOL!RCF.S, INC. Interoffice Correspondence M. J. Dvorsi<.y From R. D. Hepner K-19 Location i•lonroeville Raleigh, NC Date '.•larch 17, 1987 (1792-77-00) Raleigh soil samples collected July 15, 1986 have been tested for J per.~achlorophenol as requested. Results are attached. ?.DE/nw Attachments cc: M. Schlesinger s. Colton B. Fisher R. D. Hepner Ref. 14 I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SAMPLE # ---------- 87010142 87010143 87010144 87010145 87010146 87010147 SOURCE --------------- A-8 8-7 C-3 C-6 D-4 E-8 SPECTRIX MONROEVILLE PRODUCED ON 03/17/87 AT 09,50 PAGE DESCRIPT DAT-COL DATE-REC ------------------------------------ SOI LS 07/15/86 01/13/87 SOI LS 07/15/86 01/13/87 SOI LS 07/ 15/86 01/13/87 SOI LS 07/15/86 01/13/87 SOI LS 07/15/86 01/13/S7 SOI LS 07/15/86 01/13/87 I I SPECTRIX MONROEVILLE I TABLE 1, SUM~ARY OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS PRODUCED ON 03/17/87 AT 09,53 PAGE I SAMPLE * ----------RSLT.LNE PENTACHLOROPHENOL <EPA METHOD 8040) 87010142 Pentacn1oropneno1 ~6ioo I 87010143 Pentacn1oropneno1. 309000 87010144 Pentacn1oropneno1. 1670 87010145 Pentacn1oropneno1 .16500~ I 87010146 Pentacn1oropt1eno1. 4020 · 87010147 Pentacn1cropneno1. ,136000 Tne aoove results are reportea in ug/Kg. I Al I iaentifications are from retention aata only. I I I I I I I I I n R I SOURCE A-8 8-7 C-3 (',°4 Ji C-6 D-4 E-8 / RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA I I I I F0:2MER LAGDON AREA l b.EA A . I __;xcA VA TED i2" OF SOIL l ---. -~~~GHO~-T INSCRIBED I;- l;EA B. _·· -I £XCAVATED 36" OF SOIL>-- IHROUGHOUT INSCRIBED I REA. . ~ 0 'ro / '? . -_o- LEGEND: 0. SOIL SURFACE SAMPLES TAKEN AT EACH LOCATION (48 SAMPLES) y 0 \~ 0 0 0 0 \ I I I I I I I I I I o ( f ff --_.,._ '-Q 0/ ¾ 0 ,, I '. (0 ) I \. 0 ---."-..:...,,.,,,,,,- \ 0 , ' 0 . :..r., OUTLINE OF OLD LAGOON R. A. FISHER 8-18-36 I F.IG. 11 . .. -~ FIELD GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY OF THE DURHAM TRIASSIC BASIN By George L. Bain and Bruce W. Harvey r·-- ; -----............ I \· \,., \, \ \ Carolina Geological Society Fortieth Anniversary Meeting October 7-9, 1977 .__ ·, I iJ"'"> ' \ \ ''l l ·1 f ·,., I . ,._./ r\ . .r·--. . \ , . i I i ( ' Ref. 15 \..,. with contributions from: D. Canady V. V. Cavaroc E. I. Dittmar R. C. Hope Paul Olsen J.M. Parker, Ill. F. M. Swain Dan Textoris Norm Tilford Walt Wheeler ~o\,OGI(, j.,.~c,-.,,~~ 0 . -~ !:J v -,. /937 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ii I I I I I •'·'.;:l ... . I: FIELD GUIDE TO TIIE GEOLOGY OF TIIE DURHAM TRIASSIC BASIN NORTII CAROLINA by . 1 George L. Bain and 2 Bruce W. Harvey With Contributions D. s. Canady v. V. Cavaroc E. I. Dittmar R. C. Hope P. E. Olsen J. M. Parker, F. M. Swain D. A. Textoris N. R. Tilford w. H. Wheeler 1u.s. Geological Survey, Ral~igh, N.C. 2 Campbell College,· Buies Creek, N. C. From: III i ,, I J II I ' ' . . ' ... ·, . • ,. ' . . ,· , _ , 'l I · , · · • . · · · · ' " .. ii~ ~1_ 1 ; 11 1·.\,· ' ; ·' ,,. •.;-t-<\ti. ,1 'i,·.· , .• ,.,. J \:;-, ·;c :;, ·,;i .. COVER PI--K)TO: !"JISTRIBUTIOtJ OF EAST COAST TRIASSIC BA.SINS ■ EXPOSED TRIASSIC BA.SINS l I BURIED TRIASSIC BASINS . ~f' ; io., tift. This publicati?n was prepared in cooperation with the U.S: Geolo~ical Survey and ii,, printed through the North Carolina State Government Printing Office by the /:~i-:.: Cco~ogy and Mineral Res~urces Section, Department of Natural Resources and Com- /: . , munny Development. ~· /\·• ii ;-,: l.a~u~ by: Benjamin J. McKenzie ml,· Add1t1onal copies available from: ~At: Department of Natural Resources f, Community Development J;'. Division of Earth Resources ;td, Geoloi;y and Mineral Resources Section ,,,.,1 P. 0. Box 27687 \fi Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 ~ f.1 I I and ly ,y I .on. 1 climate· I 'lf" the ,.Dent I 1ich 11 Leal I I I I I I I GEOLOGY OF THE DURHAM-WADESBORO BASIN General Relationships Triassic basins are distributed along the Atlantic Seaboard from Nova Scotia to the subsurface of Florida (fig. 1). They extend eastward beneath the Cenozoic cover onto the Continental Shelf where they continue to be discovered by exploratory drilling and geophysical work. The Durham-Wadesboro basin extends almost across Nort_h Carolina, was filled with continental elastics in Late Triassic, and is the southernmost exposed of this series formed from Late Triassic to Early Jurassic in tectonically negative areas. The East Coast Triassic basins are mostly half grabens and/or tilted full grabens. In North Carolina, the Durham-Wadesboro basin is bounded on the east and southeast by high angle normal faults traditionally known as the Jonesboro Fault. The basin trends southwestward from near the North Carolina-Virginia line to a point a short distance across the North Carolina-South Carolina line. It is about 226 km long and averages about 16 km in width. The Durham-Wadesboro basin· is traditionally divided into four substructures which from north to south are: Durham basin, Colon cross-structure, Sanford (or Deep River) basin, and Wadesboro basin. Most of the present study has concentrated on the Durham sub- structure. The Durham-Wadesboro basin is ?urrounded and: presumed unde:rla-iri ],y the crystalline Piedmont·complex contposed of acid igneous intrusives, fueta- volcanics, ·metasediments, and high-rank metamorphic rocks·. Conti!}ental sedj,ments preserved in the Durham-Wadesboro basin include maroon to grey fanglomerate, conglomerate, feldspathic sandstone, graywacke, argillite, ·siltstone, mudstone; black shale, and minor amounts of chert and coal\ The Triassic sedimentary mass was intruded by diabase dikes and sills in Late Triassic and Earl"y Jurassic time) Individual dikes are spaced about -one km apart and_ range from 0.3 to 20 min width and up to 16 km in length. Dikes trend north, northwest, northeast, and east, but are predominantly north and northwest. 4 .' 1111!!1 ' ' ' I \ I \ \\J .f \ . \ ' \ \ \ N,H.:. \----- ' f-' I FIGURE I. WINSTON-SALEM • NORTH CHARLOTTE ---· • ELIZABETH CITY JONESBORO FAULT .CAROLINA COLON CROSS-STRUCTURE .. / ... ~ SANFORD BASIN ..... WADESBORO BASIN LOCATION MAP OF DURHAM-WADESBORO TRIASSIC BASIN - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I z Cl) <( III ti Cl) Cl) ~i 0::: l- o 0::: 0 III Cl) w 0 <t. 3 I --~ <( :c . a: ::::, 0 IL 0 o..' <( ~ z 0 I- '<( 0. g w a:: ::::, (!) LL The basin is further faulted longitudinally and transversely creating in- dividual horsts and grabens that are as small as 1 km by 3 km. Most are tilted to the east and southeast; a few are tilted to the north. Vertical displacement along the as 600 m. largest known intra-basin fault is at least 300 m and perhaps as much All known faults are high angle and normal. Diabase dikes crossing the eastern border are right-laterally offset. More extensive strike slip is suspected but has not been demonstrated. Sedimentation and Stratigraphy The sedimentary pile preserved in the Durham-Wadesboro basin contains rock. types whose lithologic variety, mineralogy, and inherent depositional structures reveal much about its tectonic origin and evolution, pa.leotopography, climate, and sediment dispersal patterns. · The alluvial fans, the angularity of the sand, the poor sorting of the fines, the size of the boulders in the fanglomerates, and the freshness of the feldspar in the Durham basin all point to short transport distance from an ele- vated source area to a nearby valley floor or graben of low relief. The deposi- tional environment was not unlike modern deposition in the intermontane basins of the Basin and Range Province or of the Salton Trough of Southern California. Typically in this environment alluvial fans formed as a direct result of a sharp break in slope and a corresponding decrease in stream competency. The decrease in stream competency _was further aggravated by loss of water through the permeable alluvium by ".sieving". The resulting high· ratio of rock detritus to water at the fan surface created shallow braided streams that slowly (?) progr_aded the coarse p:::-,:,ximal fan deposits over the finer distal ones. Individual facies within the·fan are quite localized and were caused by intermittant faulting and attendant increased relief, by meandering bifurcating channels, and by varia- bility of stream discharge. Braided streams on the fan surface created longitudinal and transverse bars which migrated downstream. Sedimentary features. of both the upper and lower flow regime are characteristic -i.e., parallel laminae, thin lenticular shales, many 6 • I 11 I . • ·, " •, ". ,-' • , . ! ' - .. - SW L C A A T Son/orO R E N M' r-----t I I Cymnock A 8 N ~ P11~,n LEGEND Formotion contoct Foul ts ........... Fossiliferous shole Diabase dikes -Di □bose sills ~ Ton ark.osic ~ fluv1ol foc1es SANFORD BA SIN J J "' • Red muds1one -sandstone - conQlomerate focies, undifferentiated 0000 0000 0000 ArgilliJe -graywacke- congld:~erate facies 61m Wester\, border" .. conglomerate Cl) X ;:r -r- DURHAM BASIN J J "' ... J J ~ • "' z g 0-,... ~ ~ "' ' ;! ,,, "' X ~ "' " r·· ,·v,.-,s···1 ~~j CHAPEL HILL\,.-,, ······,,,., «v,,:., NE 36 15 "' liiiiiiil . 0. - ::, 36 00 KOPPERS CO• , INC· NC DOO32OO383 [77 Eastern border c_onglomerate - ~ fang!omerate facies . ---·------------ ~ Chert -limestone - ~ mudstone facies - Coal -black shale facies C,R~,r 1i1;li5Y>' 0 "' ' "' PITTSBORO NFORD ·(\/ -·.:. :: :-··.·· .. : . ' FIGURE 2. RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE DURHAM TRIASSIC BASIN NORTH CAROLINA I 250,000 ~s ==jhae"'"""''5:a~ou~==::::;s~~s~~===='=~10 M' = F 10 15Km. I IFonta\ ; (1969 ,Ddis-· •Bils ar , Late 'I 1fgnost· I lfir IJ, be !' l (?) ; l alents iJ Durha. t},e a · I ~gan t becani~ tween th 1trine; obabf ' e. trad A dle 0£ ;1 lf-graben I .; ,. I This simple tripartate division based on coal does not hold up even within the Durham-Wadesboro basin. The'.chert in the Moncure area was not penetrated in the Sears No. 1 test well at New Hill even though correlation of the basal 350 m of the Sears well with the basal section of the Groce No. 1 well west of Sanford shows that the Sears well was within 90 m of being through the Pekin. Although the lower section of the Sears well correlates with part of the lower section of the Groce No. 1 well, the Cumnock is very thin or absent in the Sears well. The upper ·section of both wells are in entirely different facies. The position of the fanglom~rate at the surface along the down-faulted side of the Durham and other basins is frequently cited as evidence for continued pe:-iodic movement aloni the downthrown side .. Recent resistivity, gravity, and aeromagnetic evidence show that the basin floor "steps up" near the border fault making at least some of the surface-exposed fanglomerates early and in a basal position. In fact, part of the eastern side of the Sanford basin now mapped as Sanford Formation is most probably Pekin in age. Thus, the evidence for or against continued movem.en·t through Durham deposition may be <,roded away. The presence of the basal conglomerate does indicate strong initial relief and may indicate only the time of maximum local relief between Piedmont and basin floor. Provenance The Durham-Wadesboro basin is surrounded by crystalline rock.s of the· North Carolina Piedmont. The northern part of the basin lies between the Carolina slate belt to·the west and the Raleigh pluton'ic-gn:iss belt to the east; The southern half of the basin is entirely within the slate belt. The slate belt is a low-rank metamorphic complex (greenschist) of·silicic land wastes and felsic to mafic pyroclastics which has an overall andesitic composition (McCauley, 1961). Individual rock types include: slate (laminated argillite),. graywacke, tuff breccia, crystal lithic tuffs, flows, and phyllite. The Raleigh plutonic-gneiss belt has an ·acid plutonic core surrounded by gneisses, schists, phyllites, graywackes, and quartzites ranging up to the almandine-amphibolite metamqrphic facies (Parker, 1968). The Raleigh side of the basin contains some pegmatite. Both provinces are intruded by many quartz veins. 13 Few studies have attempted to determine the specific source area or char- Dittm, borde1 acter of the Durham-Wadesboro basin parent material. Whitehead (1962) conclude, bci'rexJ ., from.a study of the major rock types exposed at the surface in the Sanford·basit south· that the grain composition indicated a metamorphosed Precambrian .sediment sourc, at;·-pr• now largely eroded away. More specifically, he proposed that the source litho-Patte1 logy consisted predominantly of moderate-rank metamorphic rocks accompanied .. by ·c·;oss· low-rank metamorphic granitic and interbedded.volcanic rock. Klein (1969) found sedimentation from both sides of the basin based on K-Ar and paleocurrent measurements. point: Liggon (1972), from examination of a 448-m core_ from near. Gulf in the :::~- Sanfor.d basin, concluded that the source area was comprised of rocks of the .,, . .i. quartz-albite-muscovite-greenschist metamorphic facies.· Reinemund (1955) fou.nd. that the conglomerate and sandstone at the base of the section in the Sanford basin contained clasts identical to metamorphic rock types outcropping in the Slate Belt west of the basin. Crossbedded arkosic sandstone and schist arenite channel deposits indicated to him that streams flo> ed from the west and northwest into the basin on the west side (base of section) and from the southeast in the middle and upper part of the section. He also noted an increase in coarseness in the Sanford Formation to the southeast, an increase in arkose toward a c.arboniferous (?) granite pluton to the southeast, and an abundance of muscovite in the Triassic from rock types·exposed on the east side of the basin. Bell, and others (1974) reported that the Wadesboro basin shows no eastwari coarsening of sediments toward the southeast, ·although an arkosic conglomerate clearly deri.ved from a granite along the eastern border occurs near the western border. Randazzo, Swe, and Wheeler (1970) found that arkose (K feldspar) conte1 increases to the east in the Wadesboro basin. It is therefore obvious only that there was coarse sediment contribution from both sides of the Durham-Wadesboro basin. The available paleocurrent data 14 I I lhe 1 the ) 0 ; ' ' ' fj, ' '· " .:~- fa.se of rphic ro~i ... fsic •i treams fl 11 secti~ fl also , ·l 115t, an~ caheast_} on the J_ I .· '.i1 . '..(, I -' I ; 't ~' t " i Dittmar indicate that streams depositing the alluvial fans along the southeast border flowed. into the basin more or less at right angles to tfte border as might be expected. Dittmar's work in the coarse tan arkosic facies shows a strong south-southwest direction. His data from the other facies are not sufficient at present to draw a tentative conclusion about their paleocurrent directions. Patterson's work also indicated a strong southwest direction• across the Colon cross-structure. As stated above, Reinemund found a few indicators at the base pointing toward the southeast. 15 I I I B I I I I I I I I I I I DIABASE DIKES OF THE EASTERN PIEDMONT OF NORTH CAROLINA .by E. R. Burt, P.A. Carpenter, 111, . ,R .. D. McDaniel, and W. F. Wilson NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SECTION RALEIGH 1978 Ref. 16 I 'f Index map of North Carolina showing area of investigation. -l!!!!!!!!!I 11!!!!!!!!!!1 _. ---== _,.__,___✓,a iiiil - -' E. R. Burt, P. A. Carpenter 111 . ' ' R. D. McDaniel, and W. F: Wilson· 4 O Scale 4 •=:iiiiic:::liiic::====:::i. .... iiiiiiii .... iiil8 mile, - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. // Region J Geology: A Guide· For North Carolina Mineral Resource Development And Land Use Planning by William F. Wilson P. Albert Carpenter Ill Geof ogy Series 1 y North Carolina Geological Survey Section 1975 revised 1981 North Carolina Department of Natural Resources & Community Development Ref. 17 l, _ _____,_---ir------------------~· ')"'-<~\? .J... I \Y C-,'t--::;'"\ ~ .. ···-·-··· ~-';-\ ' I '1 " ' I I I ii • lill I 1111· I l 0 Ill u lill I 111 I Ill ' I .1111 I 1111 I 1111 I 11! I 111 ' I l1li ' I Triassic Basin Rocks Sedimentary rocks of the Durham and Deep River Triassic basin occur in long, narrow, north-. to northeast-trending "ha!f-grabens". These sediments -commonly dip ently to the east or southeast and . are up to 10,0 0 feet thick. The basins occupy an area 5 to 20 mil s wide and are bounded to the east by the Jonesbo o fault and to the west by metamor. phosed volcani and sedimentary rocks of the slate belt. Numerous northwest-trending faults crosscut the sediments, particularly in Lee County. These faults develop d during late Triassic or early Jurassic time. The Triassic ediments are divided into three for- mations; from o dest to youngest, they are: the San- ford Formation, the Cumnock Formation, and the Pekin Formatio . These formations consist of clays stone. siltsione shale_. sandstone. conglomerate, !Ind fanglomera e, Intrusive into the sediments are diab.:i_se i:llkes, · hich occur_ thr<;>ughout the _basin, and diabase sill • which are abundant in the Durham area. Floodplain a luvium: The floodplains include those areas tha are subject to frequent flooding. Floodplains in t e crystalline rocks are predomi- nantly narrow. F oodplains broaden in areas under- lain by Triassic sedimentary rocks and become more extensive t the southeast as the drainage dis- sects sediments of the Coastal Plain. Floodplain all vium consists of unconsolidated sediment ,:Of va ying thickness. The material is primarily dark-b wn to gray silt, sand, and clay with some gravels a d coarse boulders occasionally intermixed. Gravels: The t rrace deposits in the Deep River region include d posits of clay, sand, and gravel. These units con ist dominantly of friable silty or sandy clay and ubordinate amounts of sand and gravel. Pebbles and cobbles in the gravel consist of white or gray quaftz and occasionally of pre-Triassic metamorphic roc~s and Triassic rocks. The gravels constitute a smal part of the terraces but residual accumulations o sandy gravel are present where the terrace mater als have been extensively eroded. Sanford Form lion fanglomerate: The fanglom- erate ranges from jumbled accumulations of angular and subangular rock fragments with little sand- stone matrix to scattered, isolated blocks em- bedded in a pre ominantly sandstone matrix. The fanglomerate us ally shows little or no bedding. Fragments of all t e pre-Triassic metamorphic and igneous rock ty es exposed southeast of the Triassic basin oc ur in the fanglomerate. Adjacent to the Jonesboro fault, fragments up to 8 feet in 6 width occur. but. generally, in a northwest direction they become finer grained and more regularly bed- ded. The unit contains lenticular beds of relatively fragment-free sandstone and siltstone and local beds of conglomerate. Sanford Formation: The Sanford Formation is variable in composition. It contains few distinctive beds and no subdivisions that can be traced for any distance. The lower two-thirds of the formation con- sists of lenticular beds of red or brown claystone, siltstone, and sandstone, with occasional inter- layering of beds of arkosic sandstone. The silt- stones and claystones are mixtur~s of quartz, clay minerals, sericite, chlorite, and iron oxides. Sand- stones consist primarily of quartz and feldspar and contain a few rock fragments. Coarse-grained sand- stones and conglomerates are also present. The up- per one-third of the formation is the fanglomerate unit. Cumnock Formation: The Cumnock Formation consists of claystone. siltstone. shale, and sand- stone and contains two coal beds; the Cumnock bed and the Gulf bed. These coal beds. approximately 200 to 260 feet above the base of the formation, are underlain by light-gray, medium-dark-gray, and dark-greenish-gray siltstone and fine-grained sand- stone that contain small amounts of claystone and shale. The coal beds are overlain by medium-light- gray to black shale with small amounts of claystone. siltstone, and sandstone. The shale is irregularly calcareous and carbonaceous. The claystones and siltstones are mixtures of quartz, clay minerals, sericite. chlorite, and iron ox- ides. The sandstones are primarily quartz and feld- spar with rock fragments. They are normally uncon- solidated but, locally, cemented by calcite and silica. Pekin Formation: The Pekin Formation is strati- graphically the lowermost of the three Triassic for- mations. The unit consists of yellowish-gray or gray- ish orange, medium-or coarse-grained, cross- bedded arkosic sandstone; red, brown, or purple, fine-and medium-grained, crossbedded sand- stone; and lenticular beds of red, brown, or purple claystone, siltstone, and fine-grained sandstone. The siltstones and claystones are composed of quartz, clay minerals, sericite, chlorite, and iron ox- ides. The sandstones are primarily quartz and feld- spar, contain rock fragments, and are normally friable but locally are cemented by calcite or silica. Pekin Formation basal conglomerate: The basal conglomerate consists of a heterogeneous assem- blage of cemented and uncemented masses of con- glomerate containing local lenses of conglomerate and coarse-grained sandstone. Grain size, composi- 1- 1 I ,, 11 I i u ,, I ! I ! I I ' I I I I tion, color, and thickness of the unit changes abrupt- ly, The congtmerate contains angular to sub- rounded to ro nded pebbles, cobbles and boulders of volcanic an igneous rocks and quartz, usually in a sandstone ~atrix, One portion of the unit, called "millstone grit{' is a firmly cemented quartz con- glomerate composed of subangular or sub- rounded, gray, pink or colorless quartz pebbles and less abundant fragments of tuff embedded in a silica-cemente, , dark-yellowish sandstone matrix, ',Dia,base dik s and sills: Diabase dikes of Triassic age intrude se imentary rock sequences through- out the Durha basin, The diabase sills are restrict- ed to Triassic sedimentary sequences in Durham County, The dikes exhibit a high degree of , spheroidal we thering, and some can be traced overland by th -presence of spheroidal boulders, Diabase sills ar recognized in somewhat the same manner with I e exception that their outcrop pat- terns are muc more extensive, Size, length, and thickness of th dikes and sills is varied, and many are discontinuo s along the surface, The unweath red rocks are black, medium to fine- grained and ar composed of labradorite feldspar, augite, olivine, magnetite, and some secondary chlorite, clay, a d limonite, Weathering p oduces a brown to dark-brown soil with residual b ulders which are easily traceable where exposed on the surface, I Piedmont Rock The Piedmon rocks of Region J vary widely in their types, compositions, ages, and areal distribu- tion (Plate 1), Lok-rank metamorphic rocks of a pre- dominantly vole nic-sedimentary origin, intruded by igneous rocks f various compositions and ages, form a broad n rtheast-trending interlayered rock sequence, This ck sequence extends from the ex- treme southwe tern corner of Chatham County through Orange County into the northern half of Durham County, This rock sequence is but a small part of a compl x belt of rocks that extends for a length of appro imately four hundred miles from central Georgia to southeastern Virginia, In North Carolina, this s quence of rocks is known as the Carolina slate b it, The rocks loc ted just east of the Jonesboro fault in Wake Count)\}are a complex interlayered and interfingered se uence of high-and low-grade metamorphic ro ks oriented in a northeast-trend- ing belt known locally as the Raleigh belt These rocks were or ginally a volcanic-sedimentary sequence that va ,ied greatly in their types, composi- tions and area distribution, Included in this sequence are p yllites, metatuffs, flow rocks, and 7 mafic and felsic gneisses and schists, Within this interlayered sequence are a series of altered ultra- mafic rocks that are located in the northern part of the county, This rock sequence reflects several episodes of deformation during which igneous intrusions of various compositions, sizes and ages were em- placed, The most extensive intrusion is a granitic pluton, the Rolesville batholith, that crops out in northwestern Johnston County and covers a large area in eastern Wake County, The metamorphic _sequence is also dissected by pegmatite dikes and numerous diabase dikes of various lengths and widths, Younger alluvial and marine sediments, many of which form terraces of different widths and eleva- tions, occupy much of Johnston County and south- ern and extreme eastern Wake County, Floodplain alluvium: The' floodplains include those areas that are subject to frequent flooding, Floodplains in the crystalline rocks are predomi- nantly narrow, because of steep gradients, resistant rock types and rolling topography, Floodplains broaden in areas underlain by Triassic sedimentary rocks and become more extensive to the southeast as the drainage disse.cts sediments of the Coastal Plain, ,~ Floodplain alluvium consists of unconsolidated sediment of variable thickness, The material con- sists primarily of dark-brown to gray silt, sand and clay with some gravels and coarse boulders oc- casionally intermixed, Argillites: The light-to medium-gray to brown, fine-grained argillites are epiclastic rocks with well- developed bedding, some of which is closely spaced, imparting a laminated appearance, These argillites are composed predominantly of quartz, chlorite, and sericite, Cleavage is both bedding plane and slaty with the latter being more prevalent, Sections or slabs '/,-inch thick can easily be cleaved from this rock type, The laminated bedding in- dicates quiet-water deposition below wavebase, The argillites were apparently derived from positive areas of pre-existing volcanic flows and pyroclastic rocks which were then weathered, eroded, trans- ported, and deposited in a quiet-water environ- ment, In outcrop, the laminated argillites weather to a light-gray to buff-brown color. The cleavage and foliation planes accelerate the weathering processes which causes the argillites to form broad areas of slightly undulating topography_ Arkoses: The arkoses are fine-to medium- grained, light-gray-to buff-colored epiclastic rocks I I I I I I I I D I I I I I I I I I PHlSICAL FACTORS AFFECTING GROUND WATER RECOVERY IN REGION J In the area, round water from all rock types is generally of ace ptable quality for domestic use pro- vided it is free of surface pollution. Some of the physical factors which affect the quantity of avail- able water in lh area are described below. Rock Texture Rock texture efers to the size, shape, and ar- rangement of the component particles of a rock. Coarse-textured I rocks generally are more per- meable than fine textured rocks and consequently, may be better a uifers. Fracture Planes n Rock The interstices n many of the rocks in the area are secondary fractu es. Wells drilled at places where fractures or tract re systems such as joints or zones of shearing are etter developed will yield more water than wells rilled into more massive rocks. Cleavage and Sc istosity Cleavage· planes nd planes of schistosity are im- portant avenues I ground water movement and storage in the are . They usually dip at some angle to the horizontal hich allows water to percolate by gravity down dip atng these schistose and cleavage planes. Yields ar greater where schistose and cleavage planes a e plentiful, especially where dif- ferential rock mo ement along these planes has caused some deg ee of separation. Quartz Veins and iabase Dikes Quartz is a har , brittle mineral that fractures easily from stress caused by slight crustal move- ments. Quartz vein in the area are generally more fractured than the enclosing rock, and hence, are better aquifers. Geperally the veins are vertical or dip at nearly vertlcal angles. A well that is to penetrate an inclin d vein should be located away from the outcrop a ea in the direction in which the vein dips. The pres nee of a quartz vein can be de- tected even in deepl weathered areas by the train of loose quartz fragm nts on the soil. Dikes are tabular ock boaies of intrusive igneous. roe~, They are not ~sually good aquifers, but often the host rock adjace t to them may have been made more permeable b fractures resulting from the !Orc_e of intrusion an heat.•Many wells near Triassic diabase dikes in the Triassic sedimentary rocks are above average pro~ucers. These dikes sometimes form underground !ms which obstruct the natural movement of groun water, causing the water table to be closer to the s rface on one side of the dike. 44 Topography Topography is one of the most useful criteria in determining the relative water-bearing characteris- tics of the underlying rocks. In general, wells drilled on hills or other upland areas are less apt to yield the desired quantity of water than wells drilled in draws or other depres- sions. (1) Hills and upland areas readily shed much water from precipitation as surface runoff. As a result, there is less seepage into the ground to become ground water. On the other hand, the lowlands obtain influent seepage directly from precipitation and also from upland surface runoff. (2) The direction of movement of the ground water is toward the valleys where part of it dis- charges into streams. In addition, influent seep- age may occur from upland rock slopes beneath the residual material. The more impervious the bedrock, the more readily \s water deflected down the slope along this contact. (3) Wells located in lowlands may salvage some of the water that would be lost naturally by discharge from the underground reservoir. There the depressed water level resulting from pump- ing, if near a discharge area, prevents further dis- charge out of the area. (4) Wells on hills penetrate the water table at a greater depth than those in lowlands. When a well on a hill is pumped, the water table is lowered as a cone of depression, the center of the cone being at the well. As pumping continues the cone may grow larger and deeper but its span is limited because of the topography and because of the relatively low permeability of rocks at progres- sively greater depth below the surface. The yield of wells under these conditions is not great. On the other hand, wells in lowlands, even though penetrating the same rocks as those on uplands, intersect the water table near the ground surface. Thus, the water table can be lowered a greater distance by pumping than in a well of the same depth on a hill. The fact that the static and pump- ing water levels lie nearer the ground surface than in wells on hills results in the pumping level lying in a more permeable zone; hence the intake area is broader and the yield of the well is larger. (5) In many places hills exist because the rocks there have a greater resistance to erosion than in the valleys, this resistance being due in many places to poor jointing. Joints and fractures facilitate entrance of ground water, which promotes chemical decay and permits mechan- ical erosion. Thus depressions such as draws or ' '\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I valleys sug est that the rock underlying the depressions has more openings through which ground wate can move than the rock underlying the hills. Thickness of eathered Material Chemical we thering of rock is facilitated by the infiltration and movement of water. Therefore, a 45 thick mantle of saprolite may be an indication that the underlying rock has joints, fractures, or pores which contain ground water. Saprolite is usually porous, although not necessarily very permeable, so that a thick mantle of saprolite has a large storage an"d recharge potential. GROUND WATER IN REGION J General Statement Water loca~ed in the saturated zone of the earth's crust and su~1 plied by precipitation in the form of rain or snow is called ground water. Many differing factors contr I the amount of ground water available from any one location. The two most important fac- tors are the alnount of annual precipitation available . for supply an~ recharge and the ability of the rocks ~nd soils to a;sorb, store and transmit the precipita- tion. Other f ctors which have a direct effect on ground wate supply are rainfall intensity topog ' - raphy; climatE and types and densities of vegetation cover within , n area. Porosity, , hich is the percentage of the bulk volume of a rock or soil that is occupied by in- tersticies, an< permeability, which is the ability of rock and soil ypes to transmit ground water, varies from place t, place (Tables 2-7). Secondary in- terstices, sue as joints, cleavage, schistosity, and solution chan els, are the most important features responsible f ,r transporting water in crystalline rocks. Secondary features afford avenues control- ling the amount and the movement of ground water within an area. The soil type or types within the area have a direct relationship to the amount of precipitation ab- sorbed into the ground water zone. Tightly com- pacted clays act as impermeable barriers ac- celerating the run-off of precipitation. Loose sandy loams and sandy clay loams can absorb the precipitation and transmit it to the aquifers. In general, the ground water of the region is steadily moving under the influence of gravity from recharge areas to discharge areas. In this area, the ground-water . table usually slopes toward the streams and rarely falls below their level. This al- fords a continuous discharge which maintains the flow of the streams during dry periods and adds to . their flow during wet periods. This is also evident in springs and seeps which could be good sources of water provided no septic systems or farms are in the immediate vicinity. TABLE 2: WAKE COUNTY WATER QUALITY Water Quality As CaCOa ppm --(Number of Wells) Rock Groups Number 'Average Yield_ 'Average Depth Soft Moderately Hard Hard Of Wells < Gal./Min.: (Feet) 0-60ppm 61~120 ppm 120-180 ppm Intrusive Rocks 77 20 137 Predominantly Soft Mica Gneisses and Schists 80 19 147 Predominantly Soft to Moderately Hard Metavolcanic Rock, 23 27 212 Soft to Moderately Hard Phyllite 11 14 183 Soft to Moderately Hard .Triassic rocks (undifferentiaied) 57 ( 5 -158 Moderately Hard to Hard .• . P.•" p • TABLE 3: JOHNSTON COUNTY WATER QUALITY Water Quality As CaCOa ppm (Number of Wells) Rock Groups Number Average Yield Average Depth Soft Moderately Hard Hard Of Wells Gal./Min. (Feet) 0-60ppm 61-120 ppm 120-180 ppm Intrusive Rocks 13 NA• NA" 8 5 0 Predominantly Soft to Moderately Hard Mica Gneisses 6 1 0 and Schists 7 NA" NA" Soft Metavolcanic Rocks 16 (undifferentiated) 3 0 19 NA" NA• Predominantly Soft Coastal Plain 18 NA" NA" 13 5 0 Predominantly Soft • Data not available 16 TABLE 10: PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ROCK GROUPS SUSCEPTABILITY u ROCK GAO s SOIL ASSOCIATIONS NATURAL DRAINAGE TO PERMEABILITY•• SHRINK-SWELL•• EROSION CHARACTERISTICS Felsic and Mafic Gnel '"" Appling -Cecil Well Moderate Moderate Sllght Schists. Granite Gnel Felslc and Malle Gnel Granite Porphyries an Appling -Louisburg Wall to Excessive Moderate Moderate to Rapid Slight Pegme!ltas. Talc.Chlorlte Schists, Helena -Appling Well to Moderately Wen Moderate to Severe Moderate to Slow Slight Soapstone, Serpentln Felslc Flow Rocks, Goorgevllle -Herndon Well -Moderate to Slow Slight Pyrocle.stlcs end Epic! M aflc Volcanlcs, And tlclo Tlrzah (Davidson) Basaltic Flow Rocks an Eflend (Mecklenburg-Enon) Moderately Well lo Well Moderate to Severe Slow to Moderate Slight to Moderate PyrocluUcs. Georgeville Intrusive rock, Dlorltn d Lignum -Iredell Well to Moderately Well Moderate to Severe Slow to Very Slow Moderate to Severa Gabbroa. Herndon Triassic Rocks White Store -CreedmOOr ( \undlrtoren~ted) · • .. Mayodan '·>-!odoratelyWell ~e to Very Severe S~o~ to Ve~ Slow Moderate to Severe '-, . . , Coastal Plain, Poorty Dr ned. Lynchburg -Rains Well to Poor Slight to Moderate Moderate Sllght Nor1olk Coastal Plain, High Marl e Nor1olk -Wagram Well to Excessive SUghl to Moderate Rapid to Very Rapid Sllght Terraces. Coastal Plain, Side Slo Moclftl"otely Well to and Lower Bevatlona ol ~h GIiead Moderate Moderately Stow Moderate MarlneTftl"racoa. Somewhat Poor AOOd Plain Alluvium, Ch-ada -Wehadkee Somewhat Poor to Poor Slight to Moderate Moderate to Slow Sllght to Moderate Low Lying Terraces. Roanoke •• Theao values are deter lned mainly by the soil's texture, structure and clay types. I 22 I I ll J I I I I u I I I I I I I I SLOPE ST BILITY * D'tot5'(VE TICAL) MAXIMUM PERM~NENT SLOPES NOT REQUIRING PERMANENT RETAININGS UCTUAES~ 1.5to 1:ov r 15ft. 2.Sto 1 1.Slo t;o r 15ft. 2.Slo 1 t.Sto t;ov 15 It 2.Sto 1 Ito 1101 1 to t;ove 1 '"· 2to 1 ,-3to 1;Sp 101- ' , Investigations var 1511. \Individual de gnreq. 2to1:ove 1511 3to 1 2101:overt '"· 3101 2to 1:over '"· 3101 2 to 1: over '"· 3to 1 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ROCK GROUPS-CONTINUED DEPTH OF SOIL SOLUM (lnchn) 18 In. to 40 in. 12 In. to -40 In. 14 In. to 36 in. 181n.to401n. 18 In. to 40 In. 14 In. to 40 In. 18In.to36ln. 30 In. to 42 In. 30 In. to 42 In. 20 in. to 36 In. 30 In. to 42 In. AVERAGE THICKNESS OF SAPROLITIC BEDROCK (F .. t) Variable Varlablo Varlable Variable Variable Variable -·verlabte Variable Variable Variable Variable DEPTH TO BEDROCK (Feel) Surface to 100ft. plus Surface to 100 ft. plus Sur1aceto 100ft. plus Surface to 100 ft. plus Surface to 100ft. plus Surface to 50 ft. Variable 5ft.to 100ft. Variable Variable Variable • 75 to 60% ot Inform ion obtained from highway slope design. II exceulve amounts ol ground water occ~r. Individual slope designs ere required 23 FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS FOR HEAVY LOAD-BEARING STRUCTURES 1. Pilings 2. Deep Footings 15 ti. 3. Shallow Footings 1. PIiings 2. Deep Footings 15 ti. ,: Shallow Footings 1. Pilings 2. Deep Foo1lngs 15 It. 3. Shallow Footings 1, PIiings 2. Deep Footings 15 ft. 3. Shallow Footings 1. Plllngs 2. Deep Footings 15 ft. 3. Shallow Footings 1. Pilings 2. Deep Footings 15 It. 3. Shallow Footings 1. Shallow Footings 2. Deep Footings 15 It. .3._f:'lllngs _. 1, ~lllngs 2. Shallow Footings 1. Plllngs 2. Shallow Footings 1, Pilings 2. Shallow Footings 1. Pilings 2. Shallow Footings ' If I I I I IL INTERPRETATIONS -GENERAL SOIL MAP FOR REGION J, NORTH CAROLINA Potential For Dwellings with Sewerage Septic Tank Camp Soil Associations Systems Filter Fields Sites 1. APPLING -CECIL Good Fair: MP Good 2. GEORGErLLE-HERNDON Good Fair: MP Good !3_ .• --WHITES ORE-CREEDMOOR -MAYODAN Poor: LS, SS 'P.oor: SP-Poor: SP, C 4. NORFOL -WAGRAM Good Good Good 5. LIGNUM I REDELL -HERNDON Poor: LS, SS Poor: SP Poor: SP, C 6. CHEWAC A -WEHADKEE -ROANOKE Poor: F, W Poor: F, W Poor: F, W 7. HELENA APPLING Fair: LS, SS Fair: SP Fair: SP 8. APPLING LOUISBURG Good Fair: MP Good 9. LYNCHBU G -RAINS -NORFOLK Poor: LS, W Poor: W Fair: W 10. GILEAD Fair: SS Poor: SP Fair: SP 11. GEORGEV LLE-DAVIDSON-MECKLENBURG Good Fair: MP Good Good is the rat ng given soil associations that have soil properties for the rated use. The number of un-favorable prope ties are minor and can be overcome easily. Good performance and low maintenance can be expected. Fair is the ratin given soil associations that have a moderate number of unfavorable soil properties for the rated use. The u· favorable soil properties can be overcome or modified by special planning, design or main-tenance. During ome part of the year the performance of the structure or other planned use is somewhat less desirable than f r soils rated Good. • 14 I l ' I Small Local Picnic Play Commercial Roads and General Areas Grounds Buildings Streets Agriculture Woods Good Fair: S Good Fair: LS Good Good Good Fair: S Good Fair: LS Good Good Good Poor: S, SP Poor: SS, LS Poor: LS, SS Fair: LP Good Good Fair: S Good Good Good Good Good Poor: SP Poor: SS, LS Poor: LS, SS Poor: LP Fair: LP Fair: F, W Fair: F, W Poor: F, W Poor: F, W Fair: LP Good Good Fair: S, SP Fair: SS, LS Fair: LS, SS Good Good Good Fair: S, RO Good Fair: LS, R Good Good Fair:W Poor:W Poor: LS, W Poor: LS, W Good Good Fair: S Poor: S Poor: S Fair: S, SS Fair: LP Fair: LP Good Fair: S Good Fair: LS Good Good Poor is the rating given soil associations with soil properties generally unfavorable for the rated use. The soils in these associa\riions generally require major soil reclamation, special design, or intensive maintenance. Some of these soils, h wever, can be improved by reducing or removing the soil feature that limits use, but in most situations it is di ficult and costly to alter the soil or to design a structure so as to compensate for these adverse soil properties. Legend: ~ LS Low Strength SS -Shrink-swell R -Depth to Rock (Soil shallowness) ·SP. Slow percolation ; RO -Rock outcrops C -Too clayey s Slope F -Flooding MP -Moderate percolation LP Low productivity W-Wet 15 I I I I I I I u R I I I I I I I I I " C: ,.. ,.. m ::! z ~ "' Cl m 0 ,.. ,0 \":! > z /0 ··--3: z m " ,. ,.. " m l'l C: " n m V> 0 .,, " ,. ;,; m 8 C: z --< -< BU LETIN 86 NORTH CAROLI ~ DEPARTMENT O NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF LA D RESOURCES GEOLOGICAL SU VEY SECTION Col i'ec G C t11 Ref. 18 . • "1 . _, . :. •·a , ~. ·~, i' ,.\~~--:\~ ii;, . I a D I' I I I I I I I ' i I: I Bulletin 86 GE I LOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF WAKE COUNTY By John 1\,1. Parker, Ill Raleigh 1979 ii I ~ II I I I I I I I I I I I I I COVER PHOTO: FALLS OF THE ilEUSE, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA additional copies of this publication are available from: North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Corrmunity Development Division of Land Resources Geological Survey Section P. 0. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 Photographs by Jim Page I .. ' r~ ti ' . , I [·~ ~ ~ ' ) ~ \ , :• ' ' ~ ~ ~ ' :-; " ' ' ~·· ::' '~ ~ t..: l .\ t I TRIASSIC SEOIMErlTARY ROCKS General Description Along thew tern side of Wake County lies a thick sequence of red to gray sedimentary rocks of Late Triassic age. Th se rocks dip easterly at low angles in most places and are abruptly bounded on the east by the Jonesboro ault. "This great fracture extends northeast from near Corinth (in Chatham County) to Holly Springs, th n more northerly to pass beb1een Apex and Cary and west of Leesville, continuing to the Neuse River where it resumes a generally northP.ast course into Granville County (see pl. 1). The Triassic rocks extend ·12 t 15 r.ii1es westward into central Durham and eastern Orange and Chatham counties. This area of Triassic rocks is the Durham basin, a term applied (Prouty, 1928) to that part of the Deep River Triassic belt lyin~ northe The Deep Riv st of its constriction near the Cape Fear River (see 1953 Geologic Map of tL C.). r area is one of about extend northeastwa d fror.i South Carolina a dozen large ancl small similar belts in eastern florth America that to flova Scotia; additional buried Triassic belts are known beneath the Coastal Plain. 1892) from their o Sanford (or Cumnoc The sedimentary rocks composing thern have been named the Newarl': Group (see Russell, currcnce at Nei,,1ark, N. J. The Deep River basin has been studied in most detail in the ) basin (Car.ipbell and Kimball, 1923; Reinemuncl, 1955) because of the minable coal there. Investigations in• he Durham sub-hasin that are pertinent in part to Wake County include those of Kerr (1874 and 1875), Searer (1927), Prouty (1931), Johnson and Straley (1935), Murray (1937), Harrington (1951), Oavenport •1955), Hooks and Ingram (1955), Ballard (1959), Charles (1959), Grannell (1960), Bain (1966 and 1972), ad Custer (1966a, 1%66, and 1967). The Triassic diments in the Durham basin were deposited on a land surface formed by prolonged sub- aerial erosion of e metamorphic and igneous rocks of the region. Structures and topography that resulted from mid-to late-P leozoic tectonic activity were worn down to develcp a pen~plain extending across the present Piedmont re ion. This fairly flat land surface was displaced in late Triassic time by great north- trending faults tha created elongate basins in which enormous volumes of sediment were subsequently trapped. The sub-Triassic no confonnity now separates rocks of greatly contrasting character and age. The noncon- formity is visible long the west side of the Durham basin but is deeply buried everywhere in ~lake County. Rock Types The Triassic s dimentary rocl':s consist al~ost entirely of elastic types, ranging from comglomerate to claystone. Most of the sediment is ·poorly sorted, so that specimens contain a l'lide range of sizes and kinds ,· of constituents. P 3ominant are silty sandstones and mudstones. Gedding is irregular in form and thi~~- ness, and various ro k types commonly grade abruptly into one another both laterally and vertically. Coarser types in many places fill scoured ·channels whose bottoms cut sharrly across underlying material. Cross- bedded sandstone is orm,on. ~ecause of the ariability of these sediments throughout ~lake County and the extensive and general nature of the presen study, it has not been feasible to divide ther.1 into formal stratigraphic units. Sub- divisions based on~ ass lithology were made by Grannell (1960) for a strip extending westward from Raleigh- Durham airport. In \lake County he distinguished the Sanford Formation with upper, conglomerate division and lower, sandstone div11sion and the Cumnock Forr.1ation nearby in Durham County. In the present report essen- tially the same thre lithologic belts are delineated on the basis of distinctive, though not necessarily dominant, components. The belts recognized are, from east to west, a fanglomerate belt, a sandstone-mudstone belt, and a limestone chert belt. They are proposed for local convenience and may not be valid•at a distance, though they are consistent with studies in the Sanford basin and with a more intensive investiga- tion now underway in he Durham basin (Bain, G. L., oral comounication). I I I D I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Fan lomerat belt. Characteristic of the rocks along the east border of the Durham basin is coarse and poorly sort d conglomerate. It consists of pebbles, cobbles, and boulders of many rock types jumbled to-gether in a argillaceous, silty, sandy matrix. The rock fragments are subangular, subrounded, and rounded, and consist of vein quartz, phyllite, metavolcanic rocks, epidote-quartz rock, gneisses, and granite. All these types ccur within a mile or two east of the Jonesboro fault. The presence in the fanglomerate of many fragile pieces of phyllitc indicates they were transported relatively short distances and not subjected to vigorous brasion in stream beds. The local abundance of any one type correlates with its presence to the east. Fr example, hematite ironstone blocks have been observed in the fanglomerate only along SR 1837 ' just north o U. S. Highway 70; this is three quarters of a mile west of the iron-rich quartzite in western Umstead Park Rock fragments a foot thick are common. Prouty (1931, p. 480 and fig. 3) reported boulders more than 8 eet in diameter along Sycamore Creek, a locality now submerged by the upper lake in Umstead Park. Slabs of metavolcanic rocks as much as 8 hy 11 feet may be seen along Haley1 s Branch! half a mile north of Int rstate Highway 40 and west of SR 1650; these lie a thousand feet west of their nearest source. Granitic bou ders up to 2 1/2 feet in diameter occur along SR 1805 a quarter of a mile north of N. C. Highway 98 in Durham County ahout three quarters of a mile west of the county line. The best exposure of the fan-glomerate is t a quarry in the southwestern corner of the county on the west side of Buckhorn Creek a quarter of a ile north of the county line. Exposures are also good along the Southern Railway half a mile to a mile sou h of Morrisville. Argillac ous sandstones and mudstones are interbedded with the conglomerate layers, and all grade into one another 1 terally and vertically. Some sandstone layers include isolated pebbles or cohbles. Bedding is indistinct in the conglomerates and irregularly lenticular in the finer grained sediments. Most of the rock in this elt is red from hematite. The west rn limit of the fanglomerate belt (pl. 1) has been placed as far west as layers containing abundant pebb es were observed; the accidents of exposure have doubtless affected this delineation. Its width ranges rom about a quarter of a mile near the northern edge of the county to about 4 miles west of Holly Springs In the eastern portion of the belt, conglomeratic rock seems to make up more than half of the exposurestto the west this becomes perhaps a tenth. Conditio s of deposition for such coarse and variable red beds are regarded as being those of terres-trial alluvial fans along a steep scarp, where heavy rains alternated with drier tires. The streams are presuqed to h e been intennittent and during flood so heavily charged with suspended fine sediment that slaty rock fra ments were buoyed up and protected from complete disintegration during transport of several miles. The co rsest material may have moved essentially as landslides. The relief along this former scarp is discussed l ter in connection with the development of the depositional basin. The possibility of glacial conditions bei g responsible was considered by some early workers; Russell (.1892, p. 47-53) evaluated and rejected this ypothesis. Sandstone-muds one belt. The fanglomerate belt merges westward, by decrease in coarse elastics, into a belt consisting chi fly of 5andstone, siltstone, mudstone, and claystone. Here gray to buff sandstones become common, interb dded with typical red beds. The gray sandstones are better sorted than most of the· red ones and contain mu h feldspar and muscovite mica (micaceous ar~ose). Gray and buff arkose is especially common in the area we inent in the s t and southwest of Are.x, where it is a component in the fanglomerate belt ndstone-mudstone helt. Red mudstone and gray claystone are also connnon. as ~,e 11 as predom- Thin layers of moderately well sortP.d conglomerate containing suhrounded quartz pebbles occur locally. In the southwestern corner of the c unty laminated clay and silt and purplish siltstone and shale are noted. The westward trend in Uake County, then, is to~1ard finer grained and less iron-stained sediment and to more distinct layering. The sandstone-rn Qstone belt is 3 miles or more in width and in most places extr.nds beyond the western edge of the county. 45 R u I I I I I I I I I I I I I I An extensiv suite igneous and meta orphic Jonesboro fault i'n Wake of minerals exists in the Triassic sediments, reflecting the wide variety of adjacent source rocks. Duhling (1955) sampled Sycamore and Crabtree Creeks just west of the Courity and reported 24 minerals of which quartz was corrunonest. epidote and kyanite were ubiquitous in the heavy fraction. Ilmenite occurred in all fractions, The clay r.iin 1955); kaolin and while rals in the red beds are predominantly illite and montmorillonoids {Hooks and Ingram. vermiculite are minor. Hematite is the only crystalline iron oxide mineral present~ it occurs as fine pa ticles disseminated evenly in the clay and as irregular coatings on many sand grains. Variations in the reddish brown colors of the rocks are believed to be due to variations in particle size and degree of agg omeration of hematite. Hooks and Ingram (1955) conclude that the sediment was derived chiefly from red ateritic soils and partially weathered bed rock in a deeply dissected region. The depositi nal conditions for the sandstone-mudstone belt are presumed to have been an alluvial plain along a com lex of low-gradient streams wi~h wide floodplains. The sedime"nts formed as channel fil-lings. overflows and Custer, 1968) regional directio eets, and natural levees. Study of paleocurrent directions (Custer, 1966a, 1966b; Leith utilizing cross~bedding, imbricate pebbles, and scour channel axes. indicates that the of stream flow in the Durham basin was to the.northeast. Li~estone-chert belt. A narrow belt containing thin lenses of limestone and chert cuts across the western corner of the coun y in the vicinity of the conman boundary of Hake, Chatham, and Durham counties, about 5 miles northwest of Morrisville. The predominant rock in the belt is red mudstone with fine-grained red sandstone. Discon inuous thin layers and lenses of impure gray limestone are best developed west and-north of Nelson (in Durh m County), where they have been known f0r more than a century (Mitchell, 1842, p. 131; Enmons, 1856, p. 2 3; and Kerr, 1875, p. 187-188). This limestone has been described by Grannell (1960, p. 26) and Custer 1966b, p. 15-16 and 1967). The fine-grained limestone has numerous brown and red specks. It is exceerlingly l'.lpure, the insoluble residue of quartz, clay, mica, and or~anic matter averaging •32 per-cent. Microscopic curved laminations and round aggregates suggest organic structures. Impure limestone nodules are numero s in the old quarry of the Triangle Brick Company (in Wake County) east of fl. C. ~:ighway 55 and in roadcuts long that highway half a mile to the south. The irregular nodules range in diameter up to about 4 inches ad occur in layers and in isolated clumps. In the quarry four layers were noted in a 25-foot section of mud tone (Parker, 1966, r. 92). Attempts by the author to trace the limestone west of N. C. Highway 55 failed; he deposit may pinch out here. The sandstone ·n this belt has considerable calcareous cement. Hard. little-weathered specimens from the quarry display 'luster mottling" as a result of coarse crystallization of the calcite cement. Areas of rrore ·than a square nch show a single cleavage surface studded with enclosed sand grains. Spherical con-cretions one to thr e inches in diameter of calcite-cemented sandstone are fairly common in the Triangle Brick Ccmpany quarr Lenses of gray chert and of red-hrown jasper also occur in this belt. So111e chert is directly in contact with limestone. but some occurs separately. This siliceous rock occurs mainly in Durham County, but one locality has been n ted 2 l/2 miles north of Morrisville along N. C. Highway 54 and SR 1637. Dark gray to blackish shale is a sociated with the limestone and chert in places. The limestone ad chert are presumed to have been deposited in s□all, scattered lakes and swamps on the alluvial plain, erhaps through the agency of sir.Jple plants. \Jheeler and Textoris (1971) report algal structures, ostracod s, and burrows. They regard the limestone as having originally been calcareous tufa fanned in a playa la e. 46 ....------:---.--------------------1 lll I 'i' I 1:1 I II D Iii :~ I 1, I Iii: I 111 ' Fossils The Tr assic sedimentary rocks in Wake County contain fossils in only a few places. The princ~pal known local ties are the quarries of the Triangle Brick Company 3 miles north of Carpenter on both sides of N. C. llighw y 55. Abundant remains of plants and fish are associated with numerous, fragile ostracodes. Swain and Bown (1972 1 p. 1-3 and pl. 2) describe three species of the genus Darwinula, associated with the conchostrac n Howellites berryi. A cast of part of a psuedosuchian reptile (Stegomus sp.) was found in 1965 in the Triangle Brick C001pany old quarry east of N. C. Highway 55 (Parker, 1966, p. 92). This roughly conical segmented fossil is about 7 inc es long and from l to 3 inches in diameter. The surface shows parts of nine overlapping trans- verse curve and laminated plates that are the remains of dernal scutes of the carapace. A few similar specimens h ve been described from Triassic rocks in Connecticut (Lull, 1953, p. 79-89) and tlew Jersey (Jepsen, 19 1). Prouty (1931, p. 478 and fig. 4) reported crustacean remains from a locality half a mile west of Nelson; this is in urham County about 1 1/2 miles north of the county line. These fossils included smooth shelled ostracodes, as well as phyllopods (branchiopods) of the genus Estheria (Cyzicus). Hope and Patterson (1969b) rren ion the presence of Cyzicus in both the Durham and Sanford basins in the Pekin and Cumnock Formations ut not in the Sanford Formation. Plant emains are abundant in the Sanford sub-basin of the Deep River basin in association with, the Cumnock coa at many localities and in the underlying Pekin Formation at the brick shale quarry 1 mile north of Gulf. T ey have been studied in considerable detail by Emmons (1856, 1857), Fontaine (1883, 1900), Hope and Pa terson ( 1969a, 1970), Del avoryas and Hope ( 1971), and Schultz and llope ( 1973). Age and Correlation The fl ra indicates a Late Triassic age for the rocks of the Deep River basin. The ostracode fauna is consistent ith this detennination. The rocks are assigned a ~arnian, Norian, and possibly Rhaetian age (Van Houten, 1969, p. 8-9}, a duration of 15 to 20 million years. Correl tion of the rocks of the Durham basin with the three formations recognized in the Sanford basin (Campbell ad Kimball, 1923; Reinemund, 1955) will remain speculative until detailed work is done between the two sub basins. In the Sanford basin, the Triassic rocks include the Pekin Fo)T.lation at the base, the Cumnock Fo ation -with coal heds -in the middle, and the overlying Sanford Fomation. In the Durham basin the l ·meStone-chert belt is likely to be roughly equivalent to the Cumnock Fonnation, and, if so, the sandstone-dstone helt and the fanglomerate belt are correlative with the Sanford Formation. The question of whether he three parallel lithologic belts are really superposed formations is to be discussed in con- sidering t development of the depositional basin. Structure Regional al'\d ·local dip. The Triassic sedimentary rocks in Wake County and throughout the Durham basin dip generally ~stward (pl. l). Bedding in most places strikes north-northeast and dips 5 to 10 degrees east- . ward. Tru strike and dip are commonly uncertain because of uneven bedding surfaces, lenticular and grada- tional lay rs, channel scours, and .cross lar.iination. The strata are essentially horizontal in many places. At numerou scattered localities the rocks strike east-northeast and even northwest, and dips as high as 25 to 30 degr es are recorded. These abnonnal attitudes seem not to be systematically distributed and are not the conseq ence of folding. They probably result from local drag related to minor nonnal faults (described later) and to diabase dikes. For example, a dike on ti. C. Highway 55 about 1.5 miles south of Upchurch and 0.4 mile n rth of SR 1601 trends eastward through nearly horizontal strata; the beds north of the dike dip 5 degrees outh for about 30 feet, and those to the south dip 15 degrees south for about 40 feet. 47 Prouty (1931~ p. 482) states that the ·dip is steeper in the west portion of the basin than in the east. Reinemund (1955, p. 81) found the same situation in the Sanforn basin. Stewart and others (1973, p. 100) conclude from their seismic reflection data that the beds at depth below the Triangle Brick Company quarry in western ~ake County dip eastward at not less than 20-22 de9rees and perhaps as much as 35 degrees but that the basement surface is horizontal. These conclusions are difficult to reconcile with one another and with surface observations. Near the east side in the borrler fanglomerates, low dips to the west occur sparingly. The average angle of southeastward dip in the basin has been variously estimated as 20 degrees {Kerr, 1875, p. 141), perhaps 15 degrees (Russell, 1892, p. 94), at least 15 degrees near Durham (Prouty, 1931, p. 484), 15 degrees (Mann and Zablocki, 1961, p. 196), and about 15 degrees (Bain, 1966, p. 90). My own impression favors an average dip of about 10 degrees to east-southeast. Form and thickness of the deposits. The body of Triassic sedimentary rocks of the Durham basin forms an elongate prism with triangular vertical cross-section; it tapers out to the northeast and thins to the southwest (beyond Wake County). Along its west side the prism thins to zero thickness in most places where the rocks lie nonconformably on older crystalline basement. On the east side the prism ends abruptly against the Jonesboro fault. The deposits are inferred to thicken eastward because at the surface the bed- di_ng planes dip almost consistently in that direction. The t__hid:ness of these rocks is not known anywhere in or near Wake County because no well or dril.l holes have penefrated through them. A 285-foot well drilled at Raleigh-Durham airport and a 497-foot well at Triangle Brick Ccxnpany were entirely in Triassic rocks (May and Thomas. 1968, p. 102 and 105). A well drilled about 1885 in Durha~ (Venable, 1887; Prouty, 1931, p. 481) to a depth of 1650 feet did not pass completely throu9h the Triassic rocks. An estimate of thickness may be made by considering the width of outcrop and rate of dip,_ though several uncertainties affect its validity. The strata in most places dip gently eastward, but the amount and direction of dip vary consideraCly in places. The average dip is estimated to be about 10 degrees a little south of east. The old deep well in Durham was some 2 miles from the west border of the Triassic rocks and hence indicates a minimun eastward dip of the basement of 9 degrees. The width of the basin being about 15 miles, a 10 degree dip would give a thickness at the east side of about 14,000 feet. As pointed out by Prouty (1931, p. 484), the normal faults that are known to be prese~t may have repeated beds and increased the apparent thickness. Further, the beds that crop out in the western part of the basin may not continue down dip to the" east side, but instead they probably grade into others. Hence, the true thickness may be more or less than 14,000 fe"et. -~c.Kee_and others (1959, pl. S) give the m,3,xi~mum thicknes_s iri th_e- Durham basin as "10,IJOO .:!:. feet'~-- Two gravity profiles have been run across the Durham basin in Wake County (Mann and_ Zablocki, 1961) along U. S. Highways 70 and 64. Interpretation of the residual anomaly values indicated that the maximum thickness of sediment near the east side of the basin was 3100 feet along U. S. Highway 70 and 6500 along U. S. "Highway 64. Some uncertainty existed whether the value employed (O. l) for the difference in density between Triassic rocks and the metamorphic rocks outside the basin was appropriate, so the absolute th~ck- ness values may be in doubt. The data do imply that the thickness doubles in about 11 miles between the two traverses. Stewart and others (1973) made a seismic measurement of depth tci basement-at the Triangle Brick Company quarry at the western edge of Wake County. Their results, though tentative owing to uncertainty as to velocity values for the rocks, indicate the thickness of seciiments at that point to be 6000 .:!:. 500 feet. If this thickness of 6000 feet is accepted, the rate of thickening from the west edge of t:1e Triassic rocks to this point is about 860 feet per mile. This is almost the same as the minimum value indicated by the old 48 ~i.---------------------~ I n I D I D D u I 8 I I i I ; I I I ! I ,, I I I : deep well in Durham. If this thickening rate is projected eastward to the Jonesboro fault, the thickness at the east side will be about 12,500 feet. More recent investigation by seismic reflection-refraction traverses (Bain and Stewart, 1975), however, indicates that the thickness adjacent to the Jonesboro fault is 6000-7000 feet and that the maximum thickness, probably in excess of 9000 feet, appears to be in the middle of the basin rather than along the east side. The Triassic sedimentary rocks, then, probably are 12,000 to 13,000 feet thick in the vicinity of the Raleigh-qurham airport. The thickness must 9rarlually decrease northward along the east side of the sedi- mentary prism into Granville County where the rocks taper out. To the southwest the thickness seems likely to be about the same through much of Wake County until the constriction near the Cape Fear River is approached. Reinemund (1955, p. 38-39) estimated that the sedimentary wedge along its southeast side in the south end of the Durham basin on the east side of the Cape Fear River must be at least 6000 feet thick, ranging between limits of 5300 and 7100 feet. Jonesboro Fault. The great fracture that borders .the Triassic sediments on the east was named by Campbell and Kimball (1923, p. 55-60) for the town near Sanford in Lee County. They seem to have been the first to have recognized explicitly that the eastern boundary of the Newark rocks is a fault. Maps, sections, and texts of Enrnons (1856), Kerr (1875), and Kerr and Hanna (1888) do not refer to the matter or do not make clear whether a fault or an unconformity is intended. Russell (1892, p. ·94) states that the Newark ro,cks l 1/2 miles west of Cary are "dipping westward and resting on the crystalline terrane from which they were derived.11 This seems to imply a non-conformity, not a fault contact. The fault passes in a generally northeast direction some 38 miles completely across Wake County; it extends, in fact, nearly across the whole state. Its c6urse in Wake County has two major changes in direc- tion; the northern part (5 miles) north of the Meuse River trends northeast, the middle section (26 miles) north-northeast, and the southern portion (7 miles), southwest of Holly Springs, northeast again. Some stretches of as much as 10 miles appear to be straight or gently curving, but elsewhere short, sharp zigzags interrupt its course. Angular bends in the border fault are especially well exposed in the vicinity where U. S. Highway 70 crosses the fault, at the intersection of SR 1837 (fin. 8). Though the positions of the fault trace as mapped may not be ccmpletely accurate, exposures are so closely spaced that only minor revisions are possible. The effect is an indentation as if the Jonesboro fault were offset westward about 900 feet along two transverse faults striking east-northeast and southeast. Th_e inferred fault lying southwest of U. S. Highway 70 probably extends southeastward to displace the magnetite quartzite in northern Umstead Park. Both the Joneshoro fault and the quartzite show left lateral horizontal offset of about 1200 feet. No evidence has been detected for continuance of the inferred fault north of the highway into rocks west or east of the Jonesboro fault. Irregularities are also clearly evidenced in northern Wake County along the Meuse River, Beaverdam, and Little Beaverrlam Creeks. The trace of the border fault in much of this stretch lies beneath floodplain alluvium, so its exact position cannot be mapped. North and west of the Neuse River and Beaverdam Creek, from the county line to a point half a mile north of the junction of Little Beayerdam Creek, all exposures are of Triassic sediments, while to the south and'east all are crystalline rocks. The fault boundary here takes several sharp bends, including a three-quarter mile stretch striking south of east. The structural picture here is complicated by the merging from the southwest of the Lick Creek fault (Charles, 1959, map and p. 28, 34, 36) from within the Durham basin. Chief evidence for this fault is a prominent topographic lineament along Lick Creek in Durham County and Smith Creek in Granville County (though these two streams are not directly aligned). The courses of the Lick Creek fault and the Jonesboro border fault, thus, seem to coincide across the northern neck of Wake County. Charles suggests that the Lick Creek fault offsets the Jonesboro fault about 9 miles northeastward in this area. The abrupt zigzag 49 POND ) Figure 8. \ \ \ .;•phyll<~ \ lloa! I I \ , ' I \ ' ., ) 0 500 I I I I ' I ,.i/9 tgl 1:J: ,,, ,s; ' ' I I -~' 1000 IS00 fee! LEGEND • HORIZONTAL BEDS 0 Y" STRIKE NID DIP OF FOLIATION ~ STRIKE OF VERTICAL FOLIATION / FAULT DASIIED loniERE INFERRED .,.. OOTCROP ,, ,_, TRIASSIC FANGtOMERATE OC-~= =--f' =::; =----=~-_..,_~~~~--a. -=-~r-=-"';..:---~ -"---~ -.. ·· f phyllite ' ' Geologic map of trace of the Jonesboro fault in the vicinity where it crosses U. S. Highway 70, at intersection of SR 1837, western Wake County, N. C. I I ffl I :1;11 bends in the border fault, however, argue strongly against significant strike-slip displacement here. Resolution of this problem is beyond the scope of this report since it involves extensive study in adjacent counties. Russell (1892, p. 94) cited a notch in the outline of the Newark rocks as mapped by Kerr (1875) near. Cary that Russell thought probably indicated faults. This notch was eliminated, however, in Holr.1es 1 revi- sion ( 1887) of the map ( Kerr and llanna, W88) . This area was later investigated by Golds ton and Stuckey (1930); their results are considered later under topographic features. The course of the fault at this locality is now mapped as straight. Although some of the ahrupt bends in the Jonesboro fault may have been ca.used by cross-faulting, it ' is likely that most of them, especially those at small angles, reflect irregularities in the original te~sional fracturelthat initiated faulting. The actual fault surface is exposed almost nowhere. Its trace was mapped (pl. 1) between exposures of Triassic sediments {to the west) and those of various metamorphic and igneous rocks, spaced a few tens to a few hundreds of feet apart. Thus, in many places considerable latitude remains for revision of its loca- tion and details of fonn. Its position is readily observed, however, in the d.itches on SR 1837 about 500 feet northeast of U. S. llighway 70 (fig. 8) and along SR 1435 northeast of Apex. The best exposure of the fault that is known is at the bend in SR 1902 in Durham County, 0.7 mile west of Wake County and about 500 feet east of Laurel Creek. Here shattered. mctavolcanic rocks may be observed in contact with steeply tilted Triassic pebbly sandstone and mudstone. The fault plane dips 80 degrees west over a vertical exposure of about 5 feet; no other site was found where its dip could be measured, though it is clearly near vertical. The fault contains 4 to 5 inches of clay gouge. The Triassic rocks abut sharply against the fault surface, where they are nearly vertical. 1:owever, within 20 feet to the west they dip about 35 degrees west, and within 1000 feet the dip is 5 degrees west. At this site the Triassic strata are clearly cut off eastward by post-depositional faulting. Thou9h the basin of deposition is regarded as due to faulting -on the evidence of the fanglomerates, as discussed later -it is clear that some further displacement followed the laying down of the strata exposed here. The minimum amount of dip slip on the Jonesboro fault is indicated by the thickness of Triassic sedi- ments adjacent to it, some 12,000 feet in west-central Wake County. This value must be increased by what- ever thickness of rJewark rocks may have been eroded since their deposition, which may be considerable, though no basis of judgment seems to be available. Evidence of strike slip is scanty. The possibility of extensive horizontal offset along the postulated oblique Lick Creek fault in northern Hake County (Charles, 1959) has been noted. Further, in Chatham County a mile east of Corinth and 3 miles southwest of \~ake County near the crossing of tl. C. Highway 42 and the tlorfolk Southern Railway a·large north-northwest striking diabase dike appears to have been offset right laterally about 1000 feet. (This locality was brought to the writer's attention by J. L. Stuckey.) Whether the diabase constitutes severed segments of a single dike, or two separate dikes each ending at the fault, has not been proven. If the former interpretation is correct, the observation documents a kind of tectonic episode hitherto unrecognized in the region. Faults within the basin. The tlewark rocks are visibly displaced by small faults at several places, and similar unexposed faults of various magnitudes are likely to be numerous. Observed faults are confined to single outcrops and cannot be traced along strike. They seem to be steeply dipping normal faults, and most strike nearly north or west. A good exposure may be seen in western \Jake County in the parking lot of Hennis Trucking terminal on the southwest side of U. S. Highway 70 half a mile east of the county line. The fault strikes N. 85° W. and dips 83 degrees north. Correlation of the strata on the two sides of the fault is not certain, but the 51 hanging wall (north side) seems to have dropped about 12 feet. southwest on the hanging wall and 14 degrees on the footwa11. known leads to the inference that such orientations elsewhere from faulting or intrusion of diabase dikes. The strata strike N. 35° W. and dip 4 degre~s This abn?nnal attitude where faulting is probably are local disturbances resulting Another small normal fault with dip slip of about one foot is exposed in a road cut on SR 1624 one mile west of Carpenter (on M. C. Highway 55). An east-trending normal fault was uncovered during excavation at the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant site near the southwest corner of the county. The strata here dip 10-15 degrees eastward, and the fault dips about 75 degrees to the. south. Several diabase dikes have been displaced as well as the Newark strata. Dip slip is reported (Carolina 'Power and Light~company, 1975, p. II -7-8) to be between 80 and 100 feet and strike slip between 0.5 and 13 feet. This fault has been traced by trenching_.fox._mo.r:e. _than a mile along strike. Bain and Stewart (1975) deduced from seismic surveys that the bottom of the Durham basin is broken into horsts and grahens a mile or more in extent and having relief of more than 1000 feet. These faults probably also affect the overlying Newark rocks, which are considerably faulted. Joints. The Newark rocks in Wake County are broken by a multitude of fractures. Though some exposures show many good joints, systematic jointing is on the whole poorly developed. In more firmly cemented sandstone layers some joints are approximately planar for a few feet, but these colllllonly merge into curved and irregu- lar surfaces. Fractures in mudstone and claystone are curved and short. The range in strike and dip is usually considerable in any one outcrop or small area. No joints were observed that displayed plumose surfaces. Watson and Laney (1906 1 p. 231-232) report that exposures of sandstone northwest of Morrisville have dis- tinct sets of joints (N. 60° U., N. 45° E., and N-S at one place, and tl. 30° W. and ft 60° E. at another). Likewise, Prouty (1931, p. 483) stated that two rectangular systems of joint sets exist in the Durham basin, namely, N. 15-35° E. and II. 45-70° W. and a less important one N. 65-70° E. and N. 10-15° Ii. Grannell (1960, p. 37-40) described a numerous and consistent set of vertical joints near Lowes Grove (in Dur:1am County) that strikes N. 15° W. Throughout the rest of the area he mapped, mainly in Durham County, scanty data showed much scatter in strike with two concentrations at N. 45° E. and ti. 80° E. My own experience indicates that the regularity of jointing in the Newark rocks in Wake County is too slight to merit detailed investigation. The generally poor development of joints is probahly accounted for by the high clay content of even the sandstones, which makes them less brittle, and because the region has been subjected to vertical warping movements since the rlcwark rocks were deposited rather than compression, which would be evidenced by assoc- iated folds. Development of the Depositional Basin The elongate basin in which the Triassic sediments were deposited is regarded as having resulted from faulting. It seems to have been a half graben produced by intermittent dropping of the block west of the Jonesboro fault relative to the stationary or upraised block to the east. The sinking block tilted downward to the east and may have been recurrently bowed up along its western side. Rapid erosion of the higher· lands both east and west of the half grahen supplied sediment to fill the lowland. Intermittent slip on the bounding fault renewed the differences in eleva~ion that energized the transfer of rock material from adjacent higher ground into the trough. The possibility that the trough of deposition was produced by down-bending of the crust rather than by faulting has been stressed by Campbell and Kimball (1923, p. _60-61). Under this proposal, displacement on the Jonesboro fault post-dated all or most of the period of deposition. Had this been the situation, 52 h n l I 11 I I I, I 11 I I I I I however, the Newark sediments must have first filled the bottom of the downwarped trough and in time must have spread farther and farther out to west and east dipping toward the basin axis. Furthennore, downwarp- ing could hardly have produced the strong local relief needed for developing the fanglomerate known all along the east side and not elsewhere. Had the basin been a downwarped trough split lengthwise by post- depositional normal faulting, the upthrown eastern half being eliminated by later erosion, no possible location of the bounrlar:y·fault through the center or eastern half of the basin would have resulted in the observed relations, that is, fanglomerates to the extreme eastern margin, finest sediment near the middle, and coarser sediment again on the west side. side of the Durham basin clearly points to an The coarse a·nd poorly s·orted sediment along the entire east abrupt scarp. The fanglomerate at the northern end of the basin in Granvi"lle co·u·nty where the Triassic rocks thin out must be stratigraphically lower and older than that in central Wake County. The continuity of the fanglomerate along the east side of the basin seems to imply continuity of a scarp throughout the depositional period. Hence, it is argued that the basin was in- augurated and maintained by faulting. This interpretation is based, of course, on features observed at the present ldnd surface. Should future data from depth indicate some different kind and sequence of deposits in the subsurface, modification of the half-graben concept will be required. A similar close dependence of sediment type on tectonic activity is described by Randazzo and others (1970). in the \~arlesboro Triassic basin some 80 miles to the southwest. Let us assume, then that the basin was initiated by faulting 1-'Jith a steep scarp along the east side, that it remained stationary for a long or short time while sediment accumulated, and that as time went on the basin was abruptly deepened or renewed many times by recurrent slip along the Jonesboro fault. During any one period of stability the basin would tend to fill up with coalescing alluvial fans spreading westward from the scarp, with finer fluvial and lake deposits in the middle, and with elastics of intermediate grain size on the gentle west slope· (fig 9-A). As the successive scarps were reduced by erosion, the alluvial fans must have extended up on the margin of the upthrown block, but renewed faultin~ would have cut off·these extensions along the fault line and their material would subsequently have been redeposited in the basin. The increment of sediment accumulated between times of faulting should be thickest in the east, and probably thicker in the middle (the low part of the basin) than on the west, where some earlier deposits would tend to be eroded and shifted farther into the trough. Original dips should be westward on the east side, horizontal in the middle, and eastward along the west flank. Renewed slip on the east border fault would tilt the trough down to the east and provide space for another similar incremental wedge of sediment on top (fig. 9-D). This inferred rotation of the trough, rather than a vertical drop, would steepen the eastward dips. lessen or reverse the westward dips (Prouty, 1931, p. 485), and tilt horizontal beds eastward; this accords with observations at the present land surface that the strata dip generally but variably eastward. The Durham·basin, then, would have heen filled by the stacking of a series of similar incremental wedges of varying thickness. The wedges are likely to have extended farther an~ farther westward with time as the basin filled but to have been cut off sharply on the east by the fault. Post depositional displacement on the Jonesboro fault seems clearly to have occurred also, as was described earlier. Discontinuous faults along the west side of the Durham basin ·(see Harrington, 1951) are presumed to be of this date. According to this concept of the depositional and tectonic history, the stratigraphic division of the Triassic rocks in the Sanford basin into three fonnations (Pekin, Cumnock, and Sanford) would not apply in the Durham basin as time units. Each would be ·a lithofacies grading laterally into others and persisting upward through the whole sediment prism across time boundaries. The apparent superposition of the units, as now indicated by the generally eastward dips, would be an effect of progressive tectonic tilting during deposition. The eastward dipping sandstones at the west edge of the hasin are no doubt older than those a little to the east that dip the same way, but it is suggested that those western layers do not persist across the bottom of the basin as components of a sandstone time stratigraphic unit. Instead it is felt 53 f PEKIN FACIES CUMNOCK FACIES A. First depositional increment SANFORD FACIES -. '".· PEKIN CUMNOCK SANFORD J FACIES FACIES FACIES ~-----~------.-_____ ...,._ ____ .,,... ___ ~-=-----c,c-:=,=,7/ -- \ \ ) l B. Multip],e increments and ,post-depositional erosion Figure 9. Serial cross sections representing probable conditions of dePosition of Triass·ic sediments in Durham basiny N. C., -------------------------------------- ' I I ;I I II I :1 I II ii ~ II I II I I ~ .I I :1 that at each time level in the sequence "Pekin" facies grades eastward into "Cumnock" facie·s· and that in turn into "Sanforrl" facies. Peneplanation during later Mesozoic and perhaps subsequent times has heveled the Triassic deposits and removed an unknown thickness. Harrington (1951, p. 155) concluded from an analysis of normal faults along the west border near Chapel Hill that a thickness of 131)0 to 1800 feet of Triassic rocks had been removed at that point. McKee and others (1959, pl. 9) indicate that 2-3000 feet were eroded from the Newark rocks in the [)urham basin. 55 ---POSTeNEWARK __ (POST-TRIASSIC) DIABASE DIKES- 'D.jkes of dark ign~~us rock fill fractures in many of the metamorphic rocks, in the Rolesville' batholith, "and in-the Tri~ssic sedimentary ro~ks': Cretaceous and younger sediments overlie some of them unconformably. These dikes, then, record an episode of crustal fracturing and intrusion of basic magma during a time of crustal extension that occurred after accumulation of the Newark sediments and prior to their being eroded and transgressed by Coastal Plain deposits. Annstrong and Besancon (1970) give K/Ar dates for most of the dikes, sills, and flows studied in eastern North America of about 200 m.y., though some were older. This makes them Triassic and contemporaneous with sedimentation, a situation not confirmed hy local observatfons. Paleomagnetic studies (De Boer, 1967) indicate that the dikes were intruded during the Jurassic period, a conclusion concurred in by Sutter (1976). Though many of these intrusions in steeply dipping foliated rocks are locally conformable, sill-like bodies, all are here referred to as dikes because the general character of the group is discordant to older structures. Sills have not been observed by the author in the Triassic sedimentary rocks in Wake County, but they are known nearby in Durham and Granville Counties and in the Sanford area. Many diabase dikes have strong positive expression on the aeromagnetic maps, some are only faintly expressed, and some have no effect. These relations are described in a separate section of this report. The aeromagnetic maps have heen invaluable in tracing many dikes between widely spaced outcrops and through sediment-covered areas. The dikes are generally distributed across the county. They seem to be equally numerous in the crys- talline ~nd Triassic areas, though large dikes are most coli1ITlon east of Raleigh. Their locations are shown on the general geologic map (pl. 1) and on figure 10, which also records measured thicknesses. Some two dozen major dikes have been recorded, and many other thin ones have been noted; many more can be found. Most of them trend north-northwest though a significant number strike north and nearly east-west. Without exception thP.y dip almost vertically. Thicknesses range from less than a foot to as much as 200 feet. The largest dike discovered has been traced along a smoothly curved, northward course through Garner, east Raleigh, and Millbrook for a distance of 15 miles. Its thickness varies from about 50 to 200 feet. Its southern end is in adamellite, but for most of its length, it lies in various gneisses to the west of the pluton. In Garner along U. S. Highway 70 several small dikelets a few inches thick parallel the east contact within 10 feet of it. At least three dikes in the Rolesville hatholith are 100 feet thick in places. The longest dike known extends N. 1n° W. from the Johnston County line near Shotwell for 18 miles to near Wake Forest. No dikes have been traced to or across the Jonesboro fault in Hake County. However, a south-ti:-endillg~-.. dike at Morrisville has been traced ·to within a mile of the fault. An east-trending dike north of Apex extends within 2 miles or less, and a south-trending dike in easternmost Durham County just north of N. C. Highway 98 extends to within at least a mile of the fault and may possibly cross it. Most dikes are tabular with locally uniform thicknesses. Individual dikes show marked but gradual variations in thickness along strike. A few thin dikes in granite are irregular in fonn, having right angle bends in one or both contacts. Offshoots a~ few inches thick are not uncommon. In a few localities two or more nearly parallel dikes occur within a few feet of one another, probably the result Of oblique splitting of one dike into two. Actual intersections of dikes have not been observed, but several instances of dikes with strongly divergent trends indicate that this may occur, though forking seems roore likely. sions of wall rock are comparatively rare. nearby Inclu- The diabase is black, massive, and generally fine grained; in the larger dikes the texture is medium grained, and in the thinner ones it is aphanitic. Large dikes have aphanitic borders and coarser interiors. The rock is distinguished from other dark rocks in the area -such as hornblende gabbro and amphibolite - by narrow, lath-like crystals of dark feldspar whose cleavage surfaces in fresh rock may be recognized with 56 i I m I ·- a hand lens. A11 exposures are weathered, and the diabase saprolite is typified by coiicentrically exfoli- ated rock spheroids embedded in dark brown~ plastic clay. Most spheroids contain remnant cores of fresh rock. The outcrop strips of the dikes are marked discontinuously by dark spheroidal boulders in and on the soil that range in diameter from a few inches to several feet. Diabase consists chiefly of plagioclase feldspar, pyroxene, olivine, o1d opaque minerals. microscopic study indicates that labradorite originally composed about 50 percent of the rock, Preliminary augite 30 to 35 percent, olivine 10 to 20 percent, and magnetite-ilmenite 3 to 5 percent. Secondary alteration has pro- duced varying amounts of serpentine and chlorite at the expense of olivine and augite. The texture is inter- granular or subophitic, with anhedral pyroxene and olivine lying between or partially enclosing tabular p1agioclase. Radiating groups of feldspar crystals are common. Hennes (1964) has shown that dolerite (diabase) in the Deep River basin varies greatly in composition. He recognized four classes; in these~ olivine rangeri from O to 54 percent, au~ite from 5 to 49 percent, p1agioclase from 34 to 70 percent, micropegmatite from Oto 27 percent, and opaque minerals from 2 to 6 percent. Weigand and Ragland (1970) distin~uished four chemical types: l1) olivine nonnative: (2) quartz nonnative with low Ti02; (3) quartz normative with high Ti0 2; and (4) quartz nonnative with high iron. Variations in Wake County diabase have not been investigated in detail, but judging from preliminary petro- graphic study, minor color differences in saprolite, and marked differences in magnetic effects, they also rrust have a ·wide range of composition. All dike contacts are sharply distinct. Contact metamorphic effects have been noted only near dikes in Triassic sedimentary rocks. The typical red color of sandstone, siltstone, an~ ·shale has been chang_ed to black at and near the contacts.,.) The effect is most marked near the dikes and gradually dies out at dis- tances equal to about half the dike thickness. This ·is readily observ~d at the dike that cross~s N. C. Highway 54 a quarter of a mile.southeast of Morrisville. The change presumably is due to recrystallization of hematite pigment in the sediments to magnetite under higher temperature. A dike 2 miles northwest of Apex that crosses N. C. Highway 55 at a point 1.3 miles north of U. S. Highway 64, includes a slab of sandstone that has been partially recrystallizerl. The vertical dike strikes east-west, is about 20 feet thick, and cuts throu~h Triassic brown pebbly arkose and laminated claystone. The sandstone inclusion is 8 to 12 inches thick and stands vertically in the middle of the dike. It has been bleached white and is now a hard hornfels in which original elastic texture is still obvious. The fine-9rained matrix, however, has been recrystallized so that sand 9rains an~ quartz pebbles are completely surrounded by fine fibers of sanidine radiating from their surface; small flakes of chlorite (?) fill the intervening space. Detailed petrographic and chemical studies of similar dikes in nei~hhoring counties to the west and southwest have been made by Hennes (1964), Justus (1966), Ragland and others (1968), Reinemund (1955), Singh (1963), and Weigand and Ragland (1970). Sills or possibly buried lava flows in Triassic sedimentary rocks in Granville and Ourham Counties have been described by Koch (1967a; 1967b). A vein of laumontite about 4 inches thick is reported (Furbish, 1965) in a dike 3.5 miles west.of Wake County. The diabase dikes in the county show little consistent relation to other structures. The commonest joints in the metamorphic and i~neous rocks are near east-west, while most dikes strike north-northwest. The dikes also seem independent of foliation, though in places they are concordant. In the Triassic rocks the dikes parallel the local joints in small areas but show nllch greater regional consistency in orientation than does the poorly developed jointing. This lack of consistent parallelism suggests that many or most joints (except those filled with quartz veins) were not present until after the time of dike intrusion. As previously su~gested, jointing probably occurred at various times during recurrent re9ional uplifts. The distribution of Triassic dikes in the eastern United States and their re9ional variations in orientations have been described by King (1961; 1971). He showed that between Alabama and North Carolina 57 I l il the dikes strike northwest, while farther to the northeast they swing consistently clockwise through north to northeast. They are sharply discordant to all earlier trends, even to Triassic trends. The Wake County dikes fit this regional pattern. The presence of numerous north-trending dikes implies a suhstantial east-west extension of the earth's crust in this region at the time they were intruded. Tabulation of 22 principal dikes in a 10-mile wide strip extending 38 miles from east to west across the middle of the county gives an aggregate dike thickness of 945 feet. This total thickness indicates an average crustal expansion of 24 feet per mile (or 0.5 percent). This fracturing and extension is_ believed to be an aspect of continental rifting as North America and Africa separated when the Uorth Atlantic ocean basin was initiated during the Jurassic period (De Doer, 1967; May, 1971). 59 Pleistocene epoch. The highest of these terraces is limited on the west by the Coates scarp with toe eleva- tion of about 255 feet (Daniels and others, 1966, p. 178-180). This scarp on the uplands lies east of Wake County though fluvial counterparts extenrl up the Neuse drainage into the county. The presence of this marine topographic feature so near Wake County raises the possibility that still higher stands of the sea may have been responsible for erosional surfaces and upland sediment across l-Jake County. Though this con- cept cannot be rejected, the fluvial origin is favored by the variable elevations and heterogeneous character of the sediment. A thorough investigation of terraces on'upland ridges and valley sides, together with their superficial sediments, is needed to elucidate the erosional and perhaps tectonic history of the region during late Cenozoic time. All these features are aspects of the development of the e.xisti_ng valley system and are remnants of earlier landscape stages having different stream positions. The higher level surfaces are the older, and the formation of lower levels has involved partial destruction and modification of earlier land fonns as the shifting drainage cut deeper into the peneplain. Much of this valley shaping occurred during the Pleistocene epoch when stream gradients and base level of erosion varied with sea level fluctuations controlled by waxing and waning of the continental glaciers. Topographic Divisions Though the land forms across Wake County seem generally about the same, closer observation shows inter- esting differences related to the four principal geologic sub-areas. Some of these differences are readily apparent to an observer outdoors, while others require the larger vie~ provided by contour maps. Each area has some distinctive features not shared by the others. These geomorphic divisions generally grade into one another though sharp boundaries are evident locally. Metamorphic area. The central and northern parts underlain chiefly by metamorphic rocks are a litt1€ more hilly than elsewhere. Local relief is coounonly as much as 100 feet from upland to adjacent stream, and many slopes are steep. The highest areas in the county are irregular patches veneered with upland fluvial (?) sediment (pl. 4 and fig. 14) rising above 500 feet at Apex, Cary, Leesville, Six Forks, and Purnell. They are situated-along the western side of the metamorphic area, Cary and Leesville being just east of the Jonesboro fault and Apex just west. They 1 i e in a be 1t some five mil es wide that trends about M. 35 ° E. The belt joins the Cape Fear-Neuse divide at Apex (elevation 510 feet), making an angle with it of about 40 degrees. No other areas reaching 500 feet are within 12 to 20 miles westward, on the west side of the Triassic area. The significance of these remnant topographic highs is uncertain. Some small tributary streams ln the metamorphic area tend to flow along north-northeast lines parallel to the foliation of the rocks; examples include much of House Creek and Beaverdam Creek in west Raleigh, Lower Barton Creek, and Richlands Creek west of Wake Forest. Their positions and courses probably are con- trolled by strongly contrasting resistence to erosion of adjacent rock layers. Larger streams and many smaller ones, however, flow across the foliation direction. Adam Mountain at Bayleaf is a small monadnock in this belt that results from a partly silicified soap- stone body. It is isolated by small cre~ks on the east, west, and north sides above which it rises over 200 feet to a surrrnit elevation of 478 feet. This height, however, is only about 40 feet above the level of the general upland nearby. Although soapstone is mechanically soft, it is resistant to chemical weathering. This body contains much siliceous rock, thus pennitting it to project above more thoroughly decomposed feldspathic gneisses. Iron Mountain back of Stony Hill Church is a similarly steep knob resulting from limonite-rich siliceous rock in an ultramafic body. Jrfa'ssic sedimentary" area./ The Triassic area in western Wake County is not only a structural basin but is also a topographic lowland as was recorded long ago by Mitchell {1842, p. 130). Elevations along the west- 79 il I Ii 111 I 11,t "' ern side of the adjacent metamorphic belt commonly exceed 500 feet, while within the Triassic basin few uplands reach 450 feet. and most of the area lies below 400 feet. The highest points in the Triassic area in Wake County are about 510 feet at Apex and about 500 feet at a point 2 miles north-northwest of Leesville. Both of these points are just west of the Jonesboro fault; the fonner is also on the Cape Fear-Neuse divide (fig. 14). Elevations of the upland surfaces within the Triassic basin in anrl near Wake County decrease regularly westward, while those in the metamorphic and 9ranitic areas decrease eastward. This can perhaps be partly accounted for as general slopes toward the major rivers. but the belt of hi9hs north of Apex does not coincide with the drainage divide. These isolated topographic highs may be remnants of a_fonner drain- age divide between the areas underlain by metamorphic and Triassic rocks. Their significance, however, re- mains an enigma whose solution will require regional study. A sharp topographic break marks in places the Jonesboro fault, the eastern limit of the Triassic rocks. Crabtree Creek has a floodplain half a mile wide northeast of Morrisville in Triassic rocks, but after cros- sing the Jonesboro fault near 1-401 its valley narrows to a rocky gor~e in the metamorphic rocks. Like- wise, the Neuse River in northern Wake County meanders through a floodplain a mile wide in Triassic rocks but becomes a narrow, steep sided vallP..V in the metamorphic rocks. In this vicinity several streams follow the Jonesboro (or Lick Creek) fault~ these include the upper part of Little Beaverdam Creek, the lower part of Beaverdam Creek, the Neuse River at N. C. Highway 50, lower Lick Creek, and lower Laurel Creek. A dis- tinct fault-line scarp exists for l 1/2 miles north and 2 1/2 miles south of the point where the Neuse River crosses the fault. Small streams that drain westward down this scarp have unusually steep gradients in the crystalline area and extensive outcrops of hard rock. The dam site for the reservoir on Beaverdam Creek extends across the Jonesboro fault just north of the Neuse. This ~nvolves contrasting foundation conditions along the northeast and southwest oarts of the dam, as well as the remote possibility of earthquake dama9e. A fault scarp 2 miles west of Cary was described by Goldston-and Stuckey (1930), but this is not con- finned by the writer1 s recent work. The earlier observations were made without the benefit of a contour base map. The Jonesboro fault in this vicinity cuts N. 20° F.. rliagonally across Coles Branch. the ridge to the west, and also northward across the unnamed valley north of N. C. Highway 54. of the fault is detected here or elsewhere to the southwest in Wake County except No topographic expression for the probably fortu- itous coincidence of the primary drainage divide with the fault between Apex anrl Holly Springs and the fact that Jim Branch near Burt nearly follows the fault trace. The significance of the graphy along the Neuse River general lower altitude of the Triassic lowland, the abrupt changes in topo- and Crabtree Creek valleys \'/here they cross the Joneshoro fault. and the belt ' . of sediment-covered hilltops above 500 feet elevation near the west s1de of the crystalline area is presently unclear. hence may that they The Triassic rocks are commonly regarded as more lower level. The readily eroded great depth of have been worn to a relatively also should be readily eroded. Outcrops of hard rock, however, crystalline areas but essentially absent in the Triassic. A greater rate produce a subsequent drainage pattern with streams parallel to the belt. than the crystalline rocks and saprolite on the latter suggests are connnon along streams in the of erosion in the Triassic should Major tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the basin have this relation. In the wide expanse of lower country between the 500-foot elevations east and west of the basin, at sites 0.5 to 6 miles west of the Jonesboro fault, patches of upland sediment lie on ridge crests at elevations ranging from 330 to 370 feet. Though this might su~gest downfaulting of the basin since peneplanation, it may instead indicate it was worn lower during that process. Regional study is required. Granitic area. The eastern granitic part of the county is somewhat subdued, rolling country. Hilltops tend to be broad, gently sloping, dome or shield shaped. Local relief is co1m1only less than 100 feet, and steep slopes are rare. Little River, Buffalo Creek, Marks Creek, and Poplar Creek, all in granite. have straight, 80 Co11ection6L . G. c. Nicholson ~-I ~/ ' ·j i ·._ Cai lectlonofl / G. C. Nicholson Ref. 19 . GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES· IN THE RALEIGH AREA NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF GROUND WATER GROUND WATER BULLETIN NO. 15 North Carolina Department of Water Resources RALEIGt_, NOVEMBER 1968 '' l ;,; ,:_{ .\I . GEOJ_,OGY AND GROUND-WKfER RESOURCES IN TIIE RAJ_,EIGH Al{EA NOR1,H CAJ{OLINA By V. JEFF MAY HYDRAULIC ENGINEER, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHEMICAL QUALITY OF WATER SECTION By J. D. THOMAS CHEMIST, U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GROUND WATER BULLETIN NUMBER 15 NORTH CAROLI NA DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES George E. Pickett, Director Division of Ground Water Harry M. Peek, Chief PREPARED COOPERATIVELY BY THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES GEDIDGY TRIASSIC ROCKS Triassic sedimentary rocks underlie large areas in western Wake and southern Granville Counties. The rocks comprise part of the Triassic ,J.:rhwn basin which is one of the three sub di visions of the Triassic Deep n,,;er basin as divided by Prouty (1931). Triassic rocks in the Raleigh ,,-,-rc,a include buff arkosic sandstones, red to maroon argillaceous sandstones, ,.ur11le to maroon shales, and coarse fanglomerate. The source areas for ~''"""' sedimentary rocks were the pre-Triassic metamorphic and granitic rocks west of the basin for the interbedded sediments, and the pre-Triassic rocks east of the basin for the fanglomerate. The Jonesboro fault forms the eastern contact of Triassic rocks with pre-Triassic rocks. In Granville County the western contact is an erosional surface. Interbedded sandstone and shale can be seen at location WK-8 (figs. 5 and 13). Here the sandstone is essentially composed of quartz, feldspar, and iron oxide. The thick interbedded shales have weathered to a dark-red clay leaving the thinner sandstone beds as nearly horizontal ledges. The sandstone beds range in thickness from less than 1 foot to about 3 feet and can be traced for several miles along N. C. State Highway 55 north of Apex • . , ' .,, " . .,._, .-. ('\ • .,;\i\ ,,_ ,'"""'L):• I ,,\~,),_,;<~;:i;f ·•••~~ dit~~~Jflf Figure 13.--Interbedded Triassic sandstone and shale, 8 miles north of Apex, Wake County. Buff arkosic sandstone (loc. G-9, fig. 5) is the predominant Triassic rock type in Granville County. Angular fragments of feldspar and subrounded to angular quartz grains are the chief constituents of this rock. Mica composes about 5 percent of the rock. The angularity of the quartz and feldspar indicates a relatively close source area, perhaps the granodiorite -31 - I ;• I ii i ]' I I H B I I I I I I I I I I I I I GROUND WATER IN THE MLEIGH AREi\ which borders the Triassic on the northwest side of the basin. The com- position of the arkosic sandstone also indicates that granodiorite was the chief source rock. Basal beds of arkosic sandstone interbedded with maroon to purple shales unconformably overlie pre-Triassic rocks along the western edge of the Triassic basin in Granville County. Angular fragments of shale are in the lower part of the sandstone beds where the sandstones overlie the shale. At places the sandstones contain conglomeratic lenses of small, well-rounded pebbles. Fanglomerate crops out along the eastern edge of the Durham basin forming a belt that is as much as l mile wide in places (loc. WK-9, fig. 5). It is composed of angular rock fragments and rounded to subrounded boulders, ·cobbles, and pebbles in a heterogeneous mixture. Boulders l foot in diameter are common. The interstices between the larger fragments and boulders are filled with ~and, silt, and small pebbles. · Dense bla-ck .diabase dikes intrude the Triassic sedimentary rocks;, They strike at small angles east and west of north and range in thickness from a few inches to several tens of feet. At some localities in Wake County, Triassic rocks are unconformably overlain by unconsolidated sands and clays which at one location are cross- bedded. These sands and clays are thin and may represent outliers of Coastal Plain sediments of Cretaceous age. The Triassic sediments were deposited in a subsiding basin, probably during a period of moist to humid climatic conditions (Reinemund, 1955, p. 53). The T.riassic beds dip towards the--Jones.boro fault at an average of 12 degrees, and strike approximately parallel to the fault plane. Vertical displacement of the fault is at least the maximum thickness of the strata. This was determined by Reinemund (1955, p. 27) to be about :10,000 feet, The thickness of Triassic rocks that has been removed by erosion is unknown, but the maximum vertical displacement was no doubt much greater than the maximUl!l thickness of the strata now present. The-fault plane dips west and northwest at about 65 degrees. Soils formed from weathering of the shales are blackish-red to purple clay-soils. The arkosic sandstones weather to light-brown, sandy loam-soils that resemble soils formed from felsic intrusions. Fanglomerate weathers to dark-red soils which can be recognized by the abundant residual cobbles. TUSCAWOSA FORMATION Smith and Johnson (1887, p. 95-116) proposeii the name Tuscaloosa for sediments of Cretaceous age exposed at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Cooke (1936, p. 19) first applied· the name Tuscaloosa to Cretaceous equivalents in North Carolina. -32 - . GROUNDaWATER HYDROlfJGY In general, ground water is steadily moving under the influence of ,·:·o:,ity from recharge to discharge areas. The rate at which it moves ranges ·-···oi:i a few feet a day to a few feet a year (Meinzer, 1942, p. 449), varying .'i:•ectly with the hydraulic gradient and with the size and arrangement of :,'.1e interstices. Ground water may be discharged naturally by several methods. In humid "-:·eas, such as the Raleigh area, where the water table slopes toward the sc,eams and rarely falls below the level of them, there is a continuous seepage which maintains the flow of the streams in dry periods and adds to c,,e flow during wet periods. Where the water table is close to the surface, ciiere is heayy discharge by evaporation and transpiration during the spring "-~d summer months. Springs and seeps are also areas of natural ground-water discharge. THE OCCURRENCE AND MOVEMENT OF GROUND WATER The amount of water that can be stored in the rocks and soil is con- crolled by the size, shape, and number of pore spaces they contain. The rocks of the earth's crust, including soils and other weathered materials, contain pore space or interstices that are filled with water in the zone of saturation. These interstices range in size from the microscopic pores in clays to cavernous openings in some limestones and dolomites. Unconsolidated sediments, such as gravel, sand and clay, contain primary pores between the ,indi victual grains. When these sediments are consolidated, s_uch as the 'r,iassic sedimentary rocks, the total volume of pore space is reduced by compaction and cementation of the sediments. In crystalline rocks such as granite, schist, and gneiss, the volume of primary pore space between . individual components is very small. Most of the water in these rocks is contained in secondary interstices which were formed after the rock was , lithified. The· mo.st. important secondary interstices in the Raleigh area ,_include joints, planes of cleavage and scJ::listosity, and solution channels. In the igneous and metamorphic rocks that underlie most of the Raleigh area, many of the interstices are formed or enlarged by normal weathering processes at or near the earth's surface. With_depth,. the size and abundance of interstices decreases, consequently most ground water is in the upper 100-to 200-foot-zone of the earth's crust. Several.types of interstic~s are shown in figure 14. The path of water along interstices in some rock types is shown in figure 15. Porosity is the ratio of the volume of the interstices to the total volume of the rock expressed as a percentage. The porosity of different rocks is variable. Clays commonly have a porosity of 50 percent or more. In some crystalline rocks such as granite, the porosity may be less than 1 percent. Specific yield is the ratio of the volume of water a saturated rock will yield by gravity to the total volume of rock and is usually stated as a percentage. -35 - -· -- - - --- - - - -- I.: ·A-Primary interstices in well-sorted sedimentary deposit. s::-Pr_i_~or-Y interstices-;in poorly sorted sedimentary:. :aep_osit.· ·- -C-·Primary interstices· in sedimentary rock. Porosity hos .been greatly reduced' by cementing material-. 0-Secondary intertices as solution cavities. E-Secondary. interstice·s as fractures. . F-·s·econdory interstices as tr,fotures formed· by G -Secondary interstices olori9 foliation planes, i ptfusion·. :·Figure 14. --Diagram illustrating sev~ra.L types of interstices. &J.#!gf/'U'" •. ~-.c.-~1/4.;1~~'-: .. -.. _ _ --· ----Unweathered rock '--.... A.--Woter moves along frocture~S formed by intrusion> B. --Water moves along fractures in rock GROUND-WATER HYDROIJ1GY Well C.--Water moves along foliation planes and joints Figure 15.--Diagrams illustrating movement of water along secondary interstices. A rock unit or formation that can yield usable quantities of water to wells is called an aquifer. The relative ability of an aquifer to transmit water is called its permeability. Porosity and permeability are not necessarily related. The porosity of a rock depends only upon the volume of the interstices in relation to the total volume of the rock, whereas the permeability depends upon the size and shape of the interstices, the degree to which these are conne_cted, and the size and shape of the interconnections. Clay with a porosity of 50 percent may yield little or no water because the pores are so small that the water is held in place by molecular attraction. On the other hand, clean well-sorted sands or gravels may have less porosity but yield larger quantities of water because the pores are larger and interconnected. The permeability of sands or gravels is greatly decreased~ when clay or silt is mixed with them, or when they are consolidated by · compaction and addition of a cementing material. · The top surface·of this zone of saturation is known as the water table. The water table is not a stationary, flat surface, as the name implies, but is a fluctuating, irregular surface that locally parallels the topography. The general relation of the water table to the topography is shown in figure 16. Rocks or unconsolidated material that contain unconfined water in the zone of saturation are water-table aquifers. An artesian aquifer contains water in the zone of saturation that is confined under pressure, the pressure being greater than atmospheric pressure. Brown (1959, p. 16, 17) explains ground-water occurring under artesian conditions as follows: "Water entering an artesian aquifer where it crops out or is overlain by permeable material percolates downdip by gravity, eventually passing a line beyond which the aquifer is filled to capacity and is both overlain and underlain by relatively impermeable beds. Because the weight of the water updip in an artesian aquifer exerts pressure on the water downdip in the same aquifer, the hydro- static pressure increases progressively in a downdip direction. Thus the water level in a well that taps an artesian aquifer stands above the top of the aquifer and the weight of the column of water in the well counterbalances -37 - GH0UND WA'l'EH IN 'l'HE HALEIGH AR.FA Dikes are tabular rock bodies of intrusive igneous rock., They are not usually good aquifers, but often the host rock adjacent to them may have been made more permeable by fractures resulting from the force of intrusion and 'heat. Many wells near Triassic diabase dikes in the Triassic sedimentary :rocks are above average producers.'. These dikes sometimes form underground dams which obstruct the natural movement of ground water, causing the water table to be closer to the surface on one side of the dike. Topography Topography is one of the most useful criteria in determining the relative water-bearing characteristics of the underlying rocks. In general wells drilled on hills or other upland areas are less apt to yield the desired quantity of water than wells drilled in draws or other depressions. The reasons for this are stated by LeGrand and Mundorff (1952, p. 18-19) as follows: "(1) Hills and upland areas readily shed much water from· precipitation as surface runoff. As a result, there is less seepage into the ground to become ground water. On the other hand, the low- lands obtain influent seepage directly from precipitation and also from upland surface runoff. "(2) 'l'he direction of movement of the ground water is toward the valleys where part of it discharges into streams. In addition, influent seepage may occur from upland rock slopes beneath the residual material. 'l'he more impervious the bedrock, the more readily is water deflected down the slope along this contact. "(3) Wells located in lowlands may salvage some of the water that would be lost naturally by discharge from the underground reservoir. There the depressed water level resulting from pumping, if near a discharge area, prevents further discharge out of the area. "(4) Wells on hills penetrate the water table at a greater depth than those in lowlands. When a well on a hill is pumped, the water table is lowered as a cone of depression, the center of the cone being at the well. As pumping continues the cone may grow larger and deeper but its span is limited because of the topography and because of the relatively low permeability of rocks at pro- gressively greater depth below the surface. The yield of wells under these conditions is not great. On the other hand, wells in·lowlands, even though penetrating the same rocks as those on uplands, intersect the water table near the ground surface. 'l'hus, the water table can be lowered a greater distance by pumping than in a well of the same depth on a hill. The fact that the static and pumping water levels lie nearer the ground surface than in wells on hills results in the pumping level lying in a more permeable zone; hence the intake area is broader and the yield of the well is larger. -44 - I \~ ' ! r r ·\ . f It., r r, ~Iii 1 ,,11• ' . ·1 ·, r. ; • ii ~ I ~ . ' . • ~ I Unit ro "'~ O C V1 0 0 :::s ,----t ·rl o ro .o a, CJ ro CJ "' E c: :::S H .µ E--1 0 (l)...__,,µ:j H 0 ~ 0. "' " "" 0 CJ >-< ,g c) "" CJ H -r1, ro (JJ ~ (JJ QJ ro :z, -r1·--- H E-< CJ •rl "° Q) ·rl "° H •rl ,-., C .c al 0. H H c:, 0 P-, . . . . . . . . . . ROCK UNITS AND ·wATER-BEARING PROPER'rIES •rable 11. --Swnmary of the principal map units and their water-bearing properties Description Gray to white sands, in places arkosic, with inter- bedded clay lenses. Pebbly beds at base at some local- ities. Maximum thickness in Wake County about 80 feet. Water-bearing properties Water stored in primary interstices between sand particles. Yields adequate amounts for domestic use to dug and bored wells. Water commonly contains objectionable amounts of iron. Includes buff colored arkosic •Rocks made impermeable by compaction sandstones, and red to '-and cementation. Water is stored in maroon argillaceous sand-and moves along j~int and fracture, stones and shales. Coarse planes~ Difficult to obtain adequate fanglomerate.near the amounts of water for domestic use at Jonesboro fault forms the many places. Most favorable loca- eastern boundary of the tions for wells are in proximity to basin. diabase dikes. Average yield of 84 drilled wells is 6 gpm. Fifteen of the 84 wells yield 1 gpm or less. Water at many places is moderately hard to hard. Light to pinkish gray medium- to coarse-grained biotite granite. Associated with the granite are many coarse-grained dikes which have intruded the host rocks. Coarse-grained porphyritic biotite granite showing a weak gneissic structure of rudely alignei orthoclase feldspar crystals and biot_ite. Feldspar crystals up to 2 inches in length are set in finer-grained groundmass of quartz and bioti te. Water is stored in and moves along steeply dipping joints and nearly horizontal sheeting fractures. Aiequate domestic supplies can be obtainei from drilled wells at most places. Favorable locations may yield small industrial and municipal supplies. Average yield of 217 wells is 17 gpm. Water is soft and low in iron; quali.ty suitable for domestic and most industrial pur- poses. Water circulates through widely-spaced joints and ·sheeting fractures. Has about the same water-bearing pro- perties as the finer grained biotite granite described above. Average yield of five drilled wells is 16 gpm. Water is soft and low in iron. -55 - GROUND WA'rER IN TJIE RALEIGH AREA WAKE COUNTY (Area: 864 square miles; population in 1960: 169,082) GEOGRAPHY Wake County, in the southern part of the Raleigh area, is the largest and most densely populated county in );he area. It is bounded by Johnston, Harnett, Chatham, Durham, Granville, and Franklin Counties. Raleigh, population 93,117 is the capital of North Carolina, and largest city in the area of investigation. Other population centers in the county include Cary, Apex, Garner, Wendell, Zebulon, Fuquay Springs, Rolesville, Wake Forest, and Holly Springs. The county is the most industrialized county in the area, and most industries are located in or near Raleigh. Major industries are in the fields of electronics, research, textiles, lumber and wood products, iron and steel, and food and drink processing. Raleigh is the center of State government and several colleges are located in the city. Income from the sale of farm and dairy products is important to the economy of the rural areas of the county; tobacco is the chief crop. Wake County lies mostly within the Piedmont physiographic province, an uplifted and-partially dissected peneplain. The topography is gently rolling and interstream areas are usually broad and flat. The most rugged topography is near the larger streams where relief is generally between 50 and 100 feet per mile. No hills stand out prominently above the general upland surface. The Fall Zone, a boundary between the Piedmont and Coastal Plain provinces, passes through the southern part of Wake County. The Neuse River and its tributaries drain about 80 percent of the county-. The remaining 20 percent in the southwestern part of the county is drained by tributaries of the Cape Fear River. The Neuse River and many of its larger tributaries are antecedent streams which flow in a southeastern direction. The directions of the smaller stream courses are controlled primarily by regional structure and relative resistance to erosion of the underlying rocks. GEOLOGY Rocks of the mica gneiss unit are exposed both east and west of the large granite pluton. The lar"gest area underlain by these rocks is a north trending zone through the central part of the county west of the granite. The rocks consist principally of biotite-feldspar gneiss, quartzitic gneiss, garnetiferous biotite gneiss, and interbedded gneiss and schists. Near the main mass of granite, the biotite-feldspar gneiss is prominently banded. Light colored bands are composed mostly of orthoclase feldspar and quartz; darker bands are composed of biotite, quartz, and minor amounts of feldspar. The banded appearance is accentuated by textural differences; the biotite-rich zones are consistently finer grained than are the feldspar-rich zones. Quartzitic gneiss is exposed west of the banded gneiss as a northeast-trending zone that underlies most of the western part of the city of Raleigh • . -98 - - ' . , .. ·. . . COUNTY DESCRIPrJ:ONS The gneiss is composed of disseminated granular quartz and biotite mica, Schists are interbedded with the quartzitic gneiss and some of the schist beds are graphitic. Garnetiferous biotite gneiss interbedded with biotite schist and gneiss crop out extensively in northwestern Wake County. Foliation and bedding strike northeastward and at most places, dip to the northwest. Two northeast-trending zones of hornblende gneiss are interlayered with rocks of the mica gneiss unit. A third unit underlies a small area in southern Wake County. The gneiss is composed of hornblende and feldspar, but also contains accessory amounts of quartz and mica. The two larger units appear to be conformable with rocks of the mica gneiss unit, and perhaps are metamorphosed mafic extrusives or sediments. The small horn- blende gneiss unit is a coarse massive rock in which·gneissic texture is poorly developed. It is not conformable with enclosing rocks and is most likely a metamorphosed mafic intrusion. Several elongated soapstone bodies crop.out in northwestern Wake County. Typically the soapstone is a massive to schistose pale-green rock composed of talc, chlorite, and several iron·and magnesium bearing accessory minerals. Many of the bodies are aligned so that apparently they are thicker masses of one continuous body. The suite of minerals in the soapstone is common to ultramafic rocks that have been hydrothermally altered. A relatively narrow northeast-trending belt of metavolcanic rocks is exposed in the western part of the county. These rocks have been metamorphosed into low-rank phyllites, but fragments are discernible within some of the rocks and on their weathered surfaces. The rock is a white to cream metatuff in which quartz grains (beta quartz ? ) are· prevalent. Interlayer.ed with this rock type are thin zones of green schistose rock which contain no.visible primary features. All of the rocks have well developed cleavage which strikes northeast and dips steeply northwest. Green to light-tah phyllite crops out as a narrow tongue extending north- ward from beneath Coastal Plain sediments in southern Wake County to near the center of the county. Phyllite also underlies a small area in northeastern Wake County. The rock is composed predominantly of fine sericite, chlorite, and argillaceous material. Foliation is parallel to uniform color banding which appears to be relict.bedding. Foliation and bedding strike northeast. The thick mantle of soil which overlies the phyllite at most loca.lities obscures the contact relationship between it and adjacent rocks. The phyllite may be part of the Carolina Slate Belt of volcanic and sedimentary rocks with which it has been previously mapped (N. C. State Geologic Map, 1958). Medium~grained biotite granite, probably of Paleozoic age, underlies·most of the eastern one-half of the county. It is part of a large granite pluton that underlies most of Franklin County, and parts of adjacent counties which are not included in the area of investigation. A smaller granite body is exposed underlying Cretaceous sediments in southern Wake County. Typically, the granite is light to pinkish gray, and is composed chiefly of orthoclase feldspar, biotite, and quartz. Plagioclase feldspar is a common accessory mineral. In Wake County the granite has intruded rocks of the mica gneiss -99 - I ii Ii I ' I I GROUND WATER IN THE RALEIGH AREA unit and many coarse-grained dikes associated with the granite extend into these rocks. Sheeting, joint fractures, and exfoliated granite boulders are common. A veneer of light-colored granular saprolite covers much of the area underlain by the granite. A small body of crystalline rock which is composed predominantly of plagioclase feldspar, chloritized biotite, and quartz crops out in north-western Wake County. In composition, the rock is more closely related to the granodiorite which is exposed.north and northeast of the body than to the granite to the west. Interbedded sandstone and shale of the Newark Group of Triassic sedi-mentary rocks underlie large areas in western Wake County. The beds occur within the Triassic Durham Basin and dip gently eastward toward the Jonesboro fault which forms the eastern boundary. A coarse fanglomerate composed of boulders, cobbles, pebbles, and angular rock fragments forms a belt along the eastern edge of the fault. Vertical displacement of the fault is at least the maximum thickness of the strata in the basin which was determined by Reinemund (1955, p. 27) to be approximately 10,000 feet. Many diabase dikes, probably of Late Triassic·age, have intruded the rocks. Near Bonsal in southwestern Wake County, a thin mantle of unconsolidated sands and clays of Cretaceous(?) age unconformably overlie Triassic rocks. Coastal Plain strata unconformably overlie metamorphic and intruded rocks in southern Wake County. No fossils were found to occur in these unconsolidated sediments; they have been designated as part of the Tuscaloosa Formation of Cretaceous age on the basis of lithology and stratigraphic position with respect to sediments of known Cretaceous age outside of. the Raleigh area. The formation in Wake County is composed predominantly of gray to white sand, and interbedded lenticular lenses of clay. Quartz and concretions of iron oxide are common at the top of clay lenses·. A mixture of shell fragments and sand occurs over a small area one mile north of highway U.S. 70 at the Wake-Johnston County line (oral communication, Dr. J.M. Parker, III, of the N. C. State College Geology Department). According to Richards (1950, p. 14), this outlying deposit is part of the Castle Hayne limestone of Eocene age. GROUND WATER Raleigh, Apex, and Wake Forest obtain their municipal water supplies from surface sources. Outside of these towns, all domestic and industrial water supplies are obtained from ground-water sources. Seven towns and several residential developments use wells as a chief source of water supplies. Dug and bored wells are common sources of domestic supplies in the rural areas. Yields of 10 to 15 gpm can be obtained from the saprolite overlying granite or from the unconsolidated Coastal Plain sediments. The soil over-lying Triassic rocks generally will yield 3 to 5 gpm to dug or bored wells. ·COUNTY DESCRIPI'IONS" Data on 286 wells in Wake County are given in table 27. Average yields, depths, and other pertinent infonnation for 260 drilled wells are compared below in table 26. TL!ble 26. --Summary of data on wells in Wake County Map Unit Hornblende Gneiss Number of wells 12 •Mica Gneiss SO*· Phyllite 11 Meta- volcanic Sequence 23 Granite 77 Triassic rocks ·57 All wells 260 Hill 55 Flat 129*· Slope 49 Draw 27 *Includes one well ACCORDJNG TO ROCK TYPE Average depth (feet) 199 147 183 212 137 158 157 Yield (gpm) Per foot Range Average of well 1-50 17 0.09 .5-295 19 .13 4-2:'i 14 • 08 2.5-150 27 .13 0-82 20 .15 0-20 5 • 03 0-295 17 .11 ACCORDING TO TOPOGRAPHIC IDCATION 134 0-75 15 0.11 161 0-295 15 . 09 133 • 5-50 13 .10 223 1-150 36 .16 275 feet deep, tPsted , at 295 gpm. Percent of wells yielding 1 gpm or. less 8.3 6.2 0 0 2.6 16 6.5 9.1 7.7 2.0 3.7 According to table 26, the rocks of the metavolcanic unit, granite, and rocks included in the mica gneiss unit·, in that order, are the best aquifers. The average yield and yield per foot of well for wells in these rock types in Wake County are considerably higher than the same averages for all wells in these rock types in the area of investigation. This is because most industries and municipalities which use ground water are located in Wake County and most obtain their water from these rocks. ·Triassic ,ocks are t.he poorest aquifers, having an average) yield of 5 gpm and an average yield. per foot 6f we11· of 0.03 gpm. ·The relatively less permeable nature of the Triassic rocks is shown by the large percentage (16 percent) of wells that yield l gpm or less. Wells which yield 10 to 20 gpm are common in all of the rocks in the county except the Triassic rocks. The reported yield of several wells was greater than 50 gpm. However, in most instances the yield was detennined by bailer tests of short duration and, consequently, may be somewhat inaccurate. In general, wells penetrating granite or metamorphic rocks will at most places yield adequate amounts of water for domestic use. Where larger yields are desired, wells should be located where ground-water conditions are most favorable. Visible features which indicate favorable ground-water conditions include fracture zones, quartz veins, deeply weathered areas, intruded dikes', and topographically low areas such as draws or depres- sions. 'l'he best yielding wells in Triassic rocks are located near diabase' dikes.·· -101 - I I' I 1 11 it 11. 'ii I I' I 0 N l!!!!!!!I 385 380 375 '.J en :,;; 370 A M-10 378.94 T SILT AM1 CLAY w Jt£A THEREO SILTSTONE > 0 m 365 < I-w w 360 !: z 0 355 H I-< > w 350 _J w 345 340 M-10 -WELL DESIGNATION 378. 94 -ELEVATION . ,--- ~ -h'ELL SCREEN THJS CROSS SECTION 0£PICTS SWSI.IRFACE CCWOfTIONS AT LOCATialS SHOJt'N BASED ON SIT£ IMVESTifiATia-lS. st.BStRFACE COMJITICWS AT OTJER LOCATI(N'IS HAY OIFrER FRa'I CONDITitlVS OCCLRRIN6 AT THESE SITES. M-7 374.25 · M-6 372.58 JfcATHERED SILTSTONE HORIZONTAL SCALE (FEET) ca 0 200 M-5 370.02 M-4 TT 20X VERTICAL EXAGGERATION M-3 366.39 T M-2 37.t.49 T A' 385 380 375 '.J "' 370 :,;; w > 0 365 m < SILT AND CLAY KEATHERED SILTSTONE I-w 360 w !: z 355 0 H I-< > 350 w _J w 345 340 FIGURE GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION A-A ' RALEIGH. NC KOPPERS COHPANY. INC. - - - 8-U B 3B4.00 T 385 380 375 SILT AND CLAY '.J en :,: 370 w > 0 m 365 <( B-7 8-9 374. 00 374. 00 M-9 372.05 =11 KOO{] CHIPS K001J CHIPS B-12~ 370. oo B-i5 T 368.00 SILT AlVO CLAY ~ ,_ lt'EA 1rlER£lJ SIL TS TONE w w 360 !=- z 0 355 H ,_ <( > w 350 ...J w 345 340 • NOTES B-11 -Jr'ELL D€SI6NATION 384. 00 -ELEVATION r-~ -WELL SCREEN THIS CROSS SECTitw 0£PICTS Sl.SSIIFACE ca,DITIONS AT LOCATIONS SHOKN BASED O"I SITE INVESTIGATIONS. SUBStRFACE COMJITIONS AT OTHER LOCATIONS NAY DIFFER FRON Cfl,/OJTIONS occtRRING AT TIES£ SITES. I!!!!!!! l!!!!!I m= HORIZONTAL SCALE {FEET) ~ 0 200 EOX VERTICAL EXAGGERATION KEATHERED SILTSTONE I I M-1 370.00 T B' 385 380 375 370 365 360 355 350 345 340 FIGURE '.J (/) :,: w > 0, m <( ,_ w w !=- z 0 H ,_ <( > w ...J w GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION B-B' RALEIGH. NC KOPPERS COHPANY, INC. BS.J2.J5J - 0 l!!!!!!!!I o .. 11111 " " '--.. '\ l!!l!!I c::::::::J c::=::::J c::::::J PROPERTY BOUNDARY / I_ /IJ ·~~~~ . • -,l_ 0 ._,,,-/ \ -9 q ' I / \>. ' f / ~-1 \ '✓-'3'.?,-, '-I -\ • ,, '-~,---' __ , I h.'-!:)cAM-10 '\ . ,}'~ ~jl;,.,;,<~ --' ;,, Y .a., ' ,, , " , v"-" y ' '_,, c do I ' " / ,1-D:',' / v-·'o,, \_.s,✓-----,, ,\ ,,~.,.--,, ,-----, ,_,,, ,, ,_.._ / -' / , -/ / ' ,., y < " " , ,, M, 'It .,..-,\ '1 ,..,...,.., r ,,.---,, ,, / ,,--\\ \ -r:..";, CEH£TARY~ aa liiiiil ~ '~v> \'-,.,..,...,,, ' ' - + I\ W-12 I\ - !00 - SCALE (FEEn 0 100 200 300 -- - - - - 0 FIGURE i .LOCA lt'Ell RALEIGH/:,~o;:lI;~llE. KOPPERS COMP.I.NY l • "'· - - • ~ ◊<? ~ l!!!!!!!I l!l!!!PJ c:=i [==:J c=i Q_ 0 V() ,1 o .. " " '\ l!l!l!!I lilliil I :D: I ' I I -I I I L, i I I I ', ' I liilil SCALE (FEET) 100 0 100 200 300 - - - - - c:J ·•-· • CEHETAIIY~ -- LOCATION HAP RALEIGH/MORRISVILLE. KOPPERS COMPANY ' • INC. - -- - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: KE: File Pat DeRosa po Koppers Co., lnc. NC D00320U383 24 April l':187 I spoke by telephone with Ed Berry, Hydrogeology Regional Supervisor, Raleigh Regional Office, Groundwater Section, NC Division of Environmental Management (91~) 733-2314, regarding hydrogeologic conditions within 3 miles of the subject site. Mr. Berry provided the following information: 1. Depth to groundwater -The average depth to groundwater is approximately 10-20' below land surface (bls) in the area of the site. 2. Depth of residential wells -Bored wells have an average depth of 30-35' and are 20-30" in diameter. These wells are generally concrete pipe-cased and water enters through the joints in the concrete. Drilled wells average approximately 150' deep. These are generally steel-cased down to rock (approximately 20'-30') and open-hole for the remainder of the well. 3. Continuous confining layers -There are no distinct confining layers below the site which are continuous over a 3 mile radius. The underlying Triassic sediments have relatively low permeability except in those zones where diabase dikes and fractures occur. Diabase dikes within 3 miles of the site provide a hydraulic connection between the land surface and the various water-bearing zones throughout the aquifer. Open-hole wells and improperly filled abandoned well holes also connect the water-bearing zones. PJJ/tb/0374b Ref. 22 I I I n I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: RE: File Pat DeRosa If:> Koppers Co, Inc. NCD003200383 May 4, 1987 I spoke by telephone with Marty Schlesinger, Keystone Environmental Resources, (KER) (412) 227-2690 regarding the subject site, Mr. Schlesinger is Assistant Program Manager handling Koppers previously operated properties. Mr. Schlesinger provided the following information: 1. Depth of casing for wells Wl-W8 -approximately 20 ft. 2 Volume of former lagoons - 50' X 50' X 2,5' = 6,250 cu. ft. 30' X 45' X 2,5' = 3,375 cu. ft. Total = 9,625 cu. ft. 3. Containment-Lagoons were unlined with no diking, no diversion system, and no leachate collection system. 4. Use-The total volume deposited is unknown, however, it is estimated that the lagoons were filled at least one time. PD/pw/0384b Ref. 23 I I I n I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: RE: File Pat DeRosa /?J) Koppers Co., Inc. NCD003200383 May 5, 1987 I spoke by telephone with Rick Jones, Water System Operator, Town of Cary, (919) 469-4095, to confirm information from our earlier conversation regarding Cary's water distribution system. Mr. Jones indicated that Cary purchases approximately 3.5 mgpd from Raleigh and uses an additional 300,000 gpd from wells. Each well is chlorinated at the well head and treated water is piped directly into the distribution system. A water line from Raleigh runs through Cary to serve Morrisville. This water line continues up Hwy. 54 to Airport Blvd. out to RDU Airport. The water carried by this line does not mix with well water entering the system in Cary. PD/pw/0384b Ref. 26 I I I April 30, 1987 TO: File FROM: Pat DeRosa f[> RE: Koppers Co,, Inc. NCD 003200383 On April 14 and April 30, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Peter Bine, Town Administrator, Town of Morrisville, (919) 469-1426, regarding the source and extent of the Town of Morrisville water supply system. Mr. Bine indicated that Morrisville purchases water from Raleigh which draws its raw water from Falls Lake Reservoir, Water is piped from Raleigh through Cary along Hwy. 54 to Morrisville. All residents within the town limits of Morrisville have access to city water. North of Morrisville, the water line continues up Highway 54 and turns onto Airport Road (SR 3015)* to RDU Airport. Any homes along this line may access city water. Morrisville's line has also been extended from Hwy. 54 to serve the Belk's Warehouse on Church St. (SR 1637) and Adam's Concrete on Koppers Road. This extension, however, does not serve any additional residences. The Mobile City MHP off Hwy. 54 is also served. *Note that SR 3015 and SR 1002 have exchanged names since the 1981 photorevision of the USGS 7,5' quads. PD/pw/0384b Ref. 28 -l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I TO: FROM: RE: File Pat DeRosa ff) Koppers Co., Inc. NC D003200383 24 April 1987 I spoke by telephone with Mike Cable, Engineering Section, City of Durham Wdter Supply (919) 683-4326 regarding the extent of water distribution lines within 3 miles of the subject site. I described the area to Mr. Cable and he said the only service in that area was on Old Raleigh Road to 1000 ft. south of Hwy. 54. No lines branch off that road to serve adjoining areas. The only other line from Durham goes to the RDU airport and has no residential service. PD/tb/0374b Ref. 31 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: RE: File Pat DeRosa ~ Koppers Co. Inc. NC DOO32OO383 14 April 1987 I spoke with Don Williams, Environmental Engineer, Water Supply Branch, NC DHR, (919) 486-1191 regarding community water supply systems in Wake County within 3 miles of the subject site. Mr. Williams confirmed that Cary's water lines run through Morrisville to RDU Airport. Morrisville is served by Raleigh through Cary. Mr. Williams said that the only other community system within 3 miles is located at Howards Rest Home on SR 1624 approximately 3 miles west of Morrisville. This system uses groundwater from wells which lie within 3 miles of the subject site. He indicated the location of this system on the USGS quadrangle map. PD/tb/O373b Ref. 32 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: RE: File Pat DeRosa t{D Koppers Co. Inc. NC D003200383 14 April 1987 I spoke by telephone with Bob Hallisey, Environmental Engineering Technician, Water Supply Branch, NC DHR, (919) 486-1191 regarding community water supply systems in Durham County within 3 miles of the subject site. Mr. Hallisey said that the only community system which might serve that area is the City of Durham Water Supply. He suggested I contact Billy Walker, City of Durham, Engineering Section, for additional information about the extent of water distribution from Durham. PD/tb/0373b Ref. 33 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I April 30, 1987 TO: File FROM: Pat DeRosa RE: Koppers Co., Inc. NCD003200383 I spoke by telephone with Mr. Troy Howard, owner of Howards Rest Home near Carpenter, N.C., (919) 467-1610, to verify groundwater usage. He said that the well currently used is 160' deep with 48' of galvanized steel casing to rock. The well serves approximately 75 people. The well was drilled by Acme Well Co. out of Durham, N.C., (919) 544-1940. PD/pw/0384b Ref. 34 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 April 1987 TO: File FROM: Pat DeRosa ~ RE: Koppers Co., Inc. NC D003200383 On March 19, 1987, a meeting was held to discuss the results of groundwater water samples collected from off-site wells surrounding the Koppers Co., Inc. site in 1-brrisville. A summary of these results and a list of attendees at the meeting is attached. Due to conflicting data, it was decided that the NC CERCLA Unit would resample the off-site wells previously sampled, along with some additional wells. Samples would be split with Koppers and the State's samples would be analyzed by the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health. Residents or representatives at the 10 previously sampled locations were contacted by phone on March 19, 1987 to request permission to collect additional well samples on March 20, 1987. Permission to collect samples was obtained for all 10 wells, plus 1 new well, listed on the attached sheet. Residents were notified that they would be contacted in 2 weeks with the sample results. On March 20, 1987, NC CERCLA Unit personnel Pat DeRosa and Mary Giguere met with Marty Schlesinger, Keystone Environmental Resources and Serraphino Franch, Wake County Health Department to conduct off-site well sampling around the subject site. The 10 wells previously sampled were res amp led along with the following 3 "new" wells: Well No. 10 11 12 Name Deli Box Restaurant Watson Burroughs residence L.A. Lyons Person Contacted Scott Beerman Gladys Burroughs Barbara Lyons The locations of these additional wells are marked on the attached map. Samples were collected by the NC CERCLA Unit using containers provided by the State Laboratory of Public Health. Wells were purged for 15 minutes except at the Crowe residence at the owners request. Four 40-ml VOA bottles and 2 - 2 liter jars wrapped in foil were used to collect water samples at each well. Samples were split with Koppers. All samples were kept on ice in coolers until delivery to the labs. Koppers samples were delivered to Compuchem in RTP for analysis. The State's samples were delivered to the State Laboratory of Public Health for analysis. PD/tb/0210b Attachments (6) Ref. 35 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 19 March 1987 TO: File FROM: Pat DeRosa ~.:) RE: Koppers Co., Inc. NC D003200383 Residents or representatives at the following 11 homes or businesses were contacted by phone to obtain permission to collect well samples on March 20, 1987. Permission was granted. Well No. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Name/Phone Louis Barbee residence (919) 467-8920 John Medlin residence (919) 467-7621 George Harding residence (919) 467-~ &''1'15 Mack Baker residence (919) 467-8130 Roy Medlin residence (919) 467-8437 Triangle Materials (919) 469-2222 (919) 832-0594 Wilkerson Construction Co. (919) 467-1829 James Crowe residence (919) 467-8603 Shiloh Baptist Church (919) 469-0790 (919) 544-4016 William Barbee residence (919) 4&9 0790-"1, r-or,<,, Deli Box Restaurant (919) 467-4163 Person Contacted Cheryl Barbee John Medlin George Harding Mrs. Baker Roy Medlin Phil Ritchie, Triangle Materials Bob Ritchie, Carolantac Realty Dot Strickland James Crowe Nathanial Mayo Mrs. Barbee Scott Beerman I PD/tb/0210b I Ref. 36 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: File FROM: Pat DeRosa P't RE: Koppers Co., Inc. 15 December 1986 I spoke by telephone with the following residents to obtain permission to sample their wells. These residents or businesses use groundwater from wells surrounding the subject site. 1. John Medlin residence -467-7621 Mrs. Medlin said she would be glad to have us sample her well providing we would send her a copy of the results. The Medlin well is located south of Koppers and serves 1 house and 2 trailers. Mrs. Medlin said she would try to find out the total depth and casing depth of the well. 2. George Harding residence -467-8445 Mr. Harding gave us his permission to sample the well at his home. Mr. Harding's home is located at the end of Church Street, southwest of the site. The total depth and depth of casing in the well was unknown. 3. Mrs. Baker residence -Could not obtain phone number. 4. Roy Medlin residence -Could not obtain phone number. 5. Triangle Materials -469-2222 This business rents the property from Carolantac Realty, 832-0594. The receptionist at Triangle Materials indicated that some employees there do use the well water for drinking. They also have bottled water available. Mr. Bob Ritchie at Carolantac Realty gave us his permission to sample the well at Triangle Materials. Mr. Ritchie did not know the depth of the well, however, he suggested I call Reliable Pump Co. (266-5792) since they had recently worked on the pump. Reliable did not know the well depth but estimated it to be at least 220 ft. The well is southeast of the site along Hwy. 54. 6. Wilkerson Construction -467-1829 I spoke with Joe Wilkerson concerning the use of well water at his facility. He said that well water was used for washing equipment and flushing toilets at Wilkerson, however, it was not used for drinking. He estimated the well on site to be 400-450 ft. deep with a 2,000 gallon storage tank. He said the well pumps about 1/2 gallon per minute and is cased down to 20-30 ft. Currently, however, the pump is broken and therefore we could not sample the well at this time. The well is east of Koppers just across from Hwy. 54. Ref. 37 I I I I I I 7. James Crowe residence -467-8603 Mrs. Crowe gave us permission to sample the well at her residence on Hwy. 54, east of Koppers. She estimated that the well was 180-200 ft. deep but said it was a "weak" well. She asked that we not purge her well for fear that it would run dry. 8. Shiloh Church -Did not contact. 9. William Barbee residence -467-0876 Mr. Barbee gave us permission to sample the well at his home. He estimated that the well was approximately 100 ft. deep and cased down to 25-30 ft. Mr. Barbee's well is located northwest of Koppers on Church Street. I PD/tb/0323b I I I I I I I I I I I I.I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: RE: File fut~sa~ Koppers Co., Inc. NC DOO32OO383 5 December 1986 I spoke with William Paige and Gary Babb (NC RCRA Unit) about the current status of this site. They have received no further information beyond the renotification filed by Koppers in February 1986. I spoke by telephone with Charlie Beck, former plant manager at Kopper's Morrisville (919) 467-6151. Mr. Beck indicated that Koppers sold part of the property to Unit Structures, Inc. (as of September 5, 1986) for whom Mr. Beck now works. The part of the site where the treatment and contamination occurred is still owned by Koppers Co., Inc. To the best of his knowledge, Mr. Beck indicated that Koppers had removed contaminated soil from the site and shipped it to SCA in July-August 1986. He did not know whether post-cleanup soil and well sampling had been conducted. He said that city water was not yet available at the site and he believed neighboring residents were still on wells. Unit Structures is still using the old Koppers wells for process water and toilets. However, bottled drinking water is brought in. Mr. Beck suggested I contact Mike Dvorsky (412) 227-2684 or David Kerschner (412) 227-2677 at Kopper's Pittsburgh, PA office for further information. PD/tb/O176b Ref. 39 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: RE: File Pat DeRosa@ Koppers Co., Inc. NC D003200383 May 6, 1987 On April 28, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Bob Stewart, Plant Manager, Unit Structures in Morrisville, NC (919) 467-6151 regarding the subject site. Unit Structures operates the old Koppers plant and Mr. Stewart recently replaced Charlie Beck as plant manager. Mr. Stewart has worked at the site since the 1960's. Of the entire 52 acre property, Koppers retained 10 acres and sold the rest to Unit Structures in September 1986. The Koppers pond is currently hooked up to supply the hydrant and sprinkler system for fire protection at Unit Structures. It has no recreational or process water uses. The pond is approximately 3 to 4 acres in size and 6-7' deep in the middle. It was originally a low area which was dammed on the southeast side to form a pond. The overflow outlet in the southwest corner of the pond empties to a ditch which flows south under Koppers' road (SR 1635) to the John Medlin property. Flow from the pond is non-continuous. Bottled water is currently used for drinking water at Unit Structures. Well #1, near the main office, supplies water for toilets and non-drinking usage. Well #2, northwest of the old laminating plant is used in the manufacturing process and for plant toilets. On May 6, 1987, I spoke with Mr. Stewart again to verify ownership history of the site. Mr. Stewart said that Unit Structures originally purchased the site from Cary Lumber Co. in 1959. Cary Lumber operated a sawmill on site. Unit Structures operated the sawmill and glue-laminating process on site from approximately 1959-1962. The property was sold to Koppers in 1962. PD/tb/0374b Unit Structures, Inc. P.O. Box 23215 1413 Evergreen Rd. Louisville, KY. 40223 Ref. 40 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: RE: File Pat DeRosa f){J) Koppers Co., Inc. NCD 003200383 May 1, 1987 On April 30, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Victor Lynn, County Extension Chairman, Wake County Agricultural Extension Service (919) 755-6100, regarding irrigation within 3 miles of the subject site. Mr. Lynn said he was not aware of any irrigation wells in Wake County. He was also not aware of any irrigation from Crabtree Creek between Morrisville and Umstead Park. On May 1, 1987, I spoke by telephone with Toby Bost, Agricultural Extension Agent, Durham County (919) 688-2240 regarding irrigation wells within 3 miles of the site in Durham County. Mr. Bost said that irrigation in that area is generally from ponds. He was not aware of any groundwater use for irrigation. PD/pw/0384b Ref. 41 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I April 29, 1987 TO: File FROM: Pat DeRosa fJ> RE: Koppers Co., Inc. NCD003200383 I met with David Hedberg, Statistical Research Analyst, Wake County Planning Department (919) 755-6047, to determine whether a significant increase in population within 3 miles of the subject site had occurred since 1981. Population data from the Wake County Tax Department Real Estate File, updated January 20, 1987, was used. A circle representing a 3 mile radius around the site was overlain on the Wake County property maps. The total number of residential units within property maps intersected by the 3 mile radius were summed. Units within incorporated areas served by municipal water system were subtracted. The remaining number of units was determined to be 535. By multiplying 535 units x 3.8 persons/unit, the total population using groundwater was estimated at 2,033. PD/pw/0384b Ref. 42 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: RE: File Pat DeRosa J>b Koppers Co., Inc. NCD 003200383 April 30, 1987 I spoke by telephone with Mrs. John Medlin regarding usage of the Medlin pond, (919) 467-7621. She said that her pond receives seasonal, non-continuous overflow from Koppers pond. Overflow from the Medlin pond is also non-continuous, occurring only in the winter months. The Medlins fish from the pond and also use the pond to irrigate a 2 acre field and garden space in the summer months. PD/pw/0384b Ref. 43 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: RE: File Pat DeRosa f>j) Koppers Co, Inc. NCD003200383 May 1, 1987 I spoke with Dick Caspar, Water Supply Branch, NC DHR, (919) 733-2321, regarding water supply intakes on Crabtree Creek. He said there were no intakes along Crabtree Creek downstream of Morrisville, The nearest downstream intake is on the Neuse River more than 40 miles southeast of Morrisville. This intake serves the City of Smithfield in Johnston County, N.C. PD/pw/0384b Ref. 44 I ,,,,, I I I I I I I ,,-: I I I I I I I Ms. Pat Derosa United States Departlnent of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ENDANGERED SPECIES FIELD STATION 100 OTIS STREET, ROml 224 ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801 June 21, 1985 Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch Environmental Health Section North Carolina Department of Human Resources P. 0. Box 2091 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Dear Ms. Derosa, Ref. 45 In response to your telephone conversation with John Fridell on May 30, 1985, we are enclosing the following items of information: A. B. c. D. North Carolina county distribution records of Federally listed; proposed and status review species, map of the critical habitat of the threatened spotfin chub (Hybopsis monacha), map of the critical habitat of mountain golden heather (Hudsonia montana), and copy of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service interagency Section 7 consultation process guidelines (included for your information) 0 The abbreviations following the species names on the North Carolina species distribution records (A. above) indicate Federal status, i.e., E -endangered, T -threatened, PE -proposed endangered, PT·-proposed threatened and SR -under status review. Status review species are not legally protected under the Endangered Species Act. However, they are subject to being listed and agencies should be cognizant of their potential presence in a project area. Since additions and deletions are made to the list of species on a regular basis, questions regarding updates of the list should be made to this office. We hope this information will be of use to you. If we can be of any further assistance,• please call John Fridell or Nora Murdock at (704) 259-0321. Sincerely yours, \ \ , ;'\ C), (\ . v-ulttl ... \ . \~ Warren T. Parker Field Supervisor I I I I I I I I ,,,cs .. . ' I I I I I I I . . I' I 5/78 NORI'H CAroLINA -Critical Habitat Hyl:xlpsis nonacha, "spotfin chub" 1-'a=n and swain Counties. Little Tennessee River, lll3.in channel fran the backwaters of Fontana Lake upstream to the North Carolina-{;eorgia state line. "' S• a\n C"· -----=-M;:;c;.- Frank Ii o ✓, C:lal Co. ?_ .....__ '1arun Lu. ______ : \ ~ Rabun Co. Townt1 t:o. >;ORTH CAROLl:-A ------------GEORGIA ' ,,.--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I If> I NORTH CAROLINA -Critical Habitat Hudsonia montana, "mountain golden heather" Burke County. The area bourded by the following: on the west by the 2200' contour; on the east by the Linville Gorge Wilderness Boundary 11/80 north from the intersection of the 2200' contour and the Shortoff Mountain Trail to where it intersects the 3400' contour at "The Chimneys"--then follow the 3400' contour north until it reintersects the Wilderness Bourdary--then follow the Wilderness Boundary again northward until it intersects the 3200' contour extending west from its intersection with the Wilderness Boundary until it begins ta turn south--at this point the Boundary exterds due east until it intersects the 2200' contour. •• M,IH to /: ~--·· '. -~ PISGAH I • u: nc:._ T\. -I oun ••" -~ : ,'.:'.:t,, H•: c:H1•,n• NATIONAL ·•:::-:-::;:-OR EST ~ ~ C t _, ~ ~ -. -! .., --,1'.1~.~ .!."-1~~~---·-----) ~ .. .. ... L --___ __J -- - Spotfin Chub -- Mountain Golden Heather 1 inch= approx. 53 miles -- -- --- --·-CRITICAL HABITATS OF FEDERALLY LISTED ENDANGERED SPECIES ·rN NC SURRY STOKES ROCKING• H•M ADKIN ORS_YtH GUllfOAD KOPPERS CO., INC. NC D003200383 --- I I I I I -1 I COUNTY I jl . . _\' I I I I ,I --~ It, ... .. ,.~1,: r.:.; "' IW ld.l••v r ... 1 'll lit' •MTIJHA.1. ~/ ',IJU~1.I, ,: I 1//'MU•:r r r I•!'.'! (Ill "I/ ,1: Pl"•l\l01i Of U/~J~nw•rutAL .. AIM'.;[1100, (l~OUU1,>1All~ ',i(TlfP, F'.U. ~U• /lf.61 -~flll/GH, N,I.. :i:i! \ 1•~1l,J.l:J,; ,·,n.-1·,u,· lo~ .• lie.a t.c cJVE 11 CO'--1!1:nc_ t,'[). ___ J ___ --·-,,1:: I. i;_,1,;,.';-li:.;,:·1 : .. 1. ... ···----------------------------------- ,,,.i.~ ... ,_.l.., F, l\'i l kc.rs.on, ___ Contractor __ I Y\h' "' '-•. 1,;!,t/r I. ii.,, '•••I blo_w "I,•, Y l' 5 Ii _______ ..:!_"¥~-! {., ~~-0-.. /l s·x,:, --- _ 1_8 ____ ,JOO __ 1 .. ,11.u::, . .. Sii1 ,,,,.J-.. '"··"' . _sanJ. c t_ay __ 1- ... ~!1:!_lc .,. - s..;; ••· . '. . , f'"'\~ t'"f< <';c '."T'~!'t'W,_;;!'.'~1C~ft'<l'?f""."""'"'.''c'"if '."ll)',;l,!'!Jc'!;<!>'>,~1{•,""'7'."l't,f'!:'"i;~"'"V',!•~ r l;)'".<'l'.'"''"'''' ,.~,-,• :· ;-, -· ·---,, I .... •-· ------- ' ,,, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12 August 1986 TO: CERCLA Unit Staff FROM: Pat DeRosa ~ RE: Critical Habitats of Federally Listed Endangered Species in N.C. I spoke by telephone today with John Fridell, US Fish and Wildlife Service (704) 259-0321 to request an update on critical habitats in NC. Mr. Fridell informed me that the only change since our previous correspondence of June 21, 1985 has been a "Proposal to List the Cape Fear Shiner as an Endangered Species with Critical Habitats" in NC: (FR Vol. 51, No. 133, July 11, 1986). A copy of the proposed rule is attached for your information. PD/tb/022lb I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 133 / Friday, July 11, 1986 / Proposed Rules 25219 c- R m c~ X 100 F.q. !SA-A 7. Bibliography 1. American Society for Testing and Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Part 31: Water, Atmospheric Analysis. Philadcphia, Pennsylvania. 1974. p. 4~Z. 2. Blosser, R.0., H.S. Oglesby, and A.K. Jain. A study of Alternate S02 Scrubber Designs Used for TRS Monitoring. National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., New York, New York. Special Report 77--05. July 1977. 3. Curtis, F .. and C.D. McAlister. De\·elopment and Evaluation of an · Oxidation/Method 6 TRS Emission Sampling Procedure. Emission Measurement Branch, Emission Standards and Engineering Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina·21n1. February 1980. 4. Gellman, I. A Laboratory and Field Study of Reduced Sulfur Sampling and Monitoring Systems. National Council of the Paper lndustry for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., New York, New York. Atmospheric Quality Improvement Technical Bulletin No. 81. October 1975. 5. Margeson. J.H .. J.E. Knoll. M.R. Midget~ D.B. Ferguson, and P.J. Schworer. A Manual Method for TRS Determination. Jownal of Air Pollution Control AssociatiOn. 35:1280-1286: December 1965. [FR Doc. 86-15268 Filed 7-10-IIB; 8:45 am] BIL.UNG CODE 65&0-50-11 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife · and Plants; Proposal to List the Cape Fear Shiner as an Endangered Species · with Critical Habitat AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service. Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The Service proposes to list the Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) as an endangered species with critical habitat m1der the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as. amended. This fish has recently · undergone a reduction in range and population. It is currently known from · only three small populations in the Cape Fear River drainage in Randolph. Moore, Lee, and Chatham Counties. North Carolina. Due to the species' limited distribution, any factor that degrades habitat or water qua!ity in the short river reaches it inhabits-e.g .• land use changes, chemical spills, wastewater discharges, impoundments, changes in stream flow, or increases in agricultural ~unoff-could threaten the species' survivial. Comments and information pertaining to this proposal are sought from the public.· DATES: Comments from all interested parties must be received by September 9, 1986. Public hearing requests must be received by August 25. 1986. ADDRESSES:.Comments and materials concerning this proposal should be sent .to Field Supervisor, Endangered Species Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 100 Olis Street Room 224. Asheville, North Carolina 28801 .. Comments and materials receiv·ed will be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the above address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard G. Biggins, at the above address (704/259--0321 or.ITS 672--0321). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Cape Fear shiner (Noropis mekistocholas), the only endemic fish known from North Carolina's Cape Fear River drainage, was discovered in 1962 and described by Snelsori (1971). This · fish has been collected from nine stream reaches in North Carolina (Bear Creek. Rocky River, and Robeson Creek, Chatham County; Fork Creek. Randolph County; Deep River, Moore and Randolph Counties: Deep River, · Chatham and Lee Counties; and Cape Fear River, Kenneth Creek, and Parkers Creek, Harnett County (Snelson 1971, . W. Palmer and A. Braswell, North Carolina State Museum of Natural HistOry, personBi' Comnu.inication' igss;· Pattern and Huish 1985, 1986). Based on a recently completed Service-funded · study (Pattern and Huish 1965, 1986) involving extensive surveys in the Cape Fear River Basin (including all historic sites) and a review of hisiorical fish collection records from the Cape Fear, Neuse, and Yadkin River systems, the fish ls now restricted to only three populations. The strongest population (101 individuals collected in 1984 and· 1985) ls located around the junction of the Rocky River and Deep River in Chatham and Lee Counties where the fish inhabits the Deep River from the upstream limits of the backwaters of Locks ville Dam upstream to the Rocky River then uJ)stream from the Rocky River to Bear Creek and upstream from Bear Creek to the Chatham County Road 2156 Bridge. A few individuals were collected just downstream of the Locksville Dam. but because of the limited extent of Cape Fear shiner habitat at this site, it is not believed this is a separate population. Instead, it is thought these fish represent a small number of individuals that periodically. drop down From the popul_ation abov~ Locksville Dam pool. The second population, represented by the collection of a specimen near State Highway Bridge 902 in Chatham County, is located above the Rocky River Hydroelectric Dam. This popula lion was historically the best. but the area yielded onIY the one specimen after extensive surveys by Pattern.and Huish (1985). The third population was found in the Deep River system in Randolph and Moore Counties. This. population is believed lo be small (Pattern and Huish 1985, .1986). Three individuals were found above the · Highfalls Hydroelectric Reservoir; one in Fork Creek, Randolph County, and. two in the Deep River, Moore County. . The species was also found downstream of the highfalls Dam. However, the . extent of suitable habitat in this stream reach is limited, and ii is thought that· .. · these individuals likely result from .. downstream movement from above the reservoir where Cape Fear shiner habitat is more _extensiv.e~ ,· · .·_ ., . The Caper Fear shiner is smaU.-rarely ·. . exceeding z inches in length. The fish's .body is flushed with a pale silvery .. ··. yellow, and a black band.runs along its sides (Snelson 1971). The fins are yellowish. and somewhat pointed. The:,: · upper lip is black. and .the lower lip .· · bears a thin black bar along its.margin, The. Cape Fear shiner, lll)like .most other • members of the large· g_enlls tJo}rofais~ ,·. ·· .... feeds extensiv~ly_in plallt m<1:teriel, an~ '·. ·. ·-.' : its digestive tract is mo9,ified for this .. :i : ·· ·· .. ._ .. · diet by having ail elongated, convoluted· . intestine. The species is generally associated with gravel, cobble, and boulder substates and has been observed to inhabit slow pools, riffles; and slow runs (Snelson 1971, Pattern· and Huish 1985). In these habitats, the species is typically associated with schools of other related species, but it is never the numerically domin!lnt .species. Juveniles are orten found in slackwater, among large rock outcrops in mid- stream, and in flooded side channels .. and pools (Pattern and Huish 1985). No information is presently available on breeding behavior, fei::undity, or longevity. The Cape Fear shiner may always have existed in low numbers. However, its recent reduction in range and its small population size (Pattern and Huish 1985, 1986) increases the species' vulnerability to a catastrophic event, such as a toxic chemical spill. Dam construction in the Cape Fear system has probably had the most serious impact on the species by inundating the species' rocky riverine habitat. Dams 25220 Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 133 / Friday. July 11, 1986 / Proposed Rules presently under study by the U.S. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers (COE), for the Deep River and changes in flow regulation at existi!lg hydroelectic facilities could further threaten the species. The deterioration of waler quality has likely been another factor in the species' decline. The North _Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development (1983) classified waler quality in the Deep River, Rocky River, and Bear Creek as good to fair, and referred to the Rocky river below Siler City as an area where their sampling indicates degradation. That report also stated: "Within the Cape Fear Basin, estimated average ann·ual soil losses from cropland ranged from 3 tons per acre in the lower basin lo 12 tons in the headwaters." The North Carolina Slate Division of Soil and \\' ater Conservation · c0nsiders 5 tons of soil loss per acre as the maximum allowable. . . . The Cape Fear shiner was one of 29. · fish species included in a March 18, 1975, Notice of Re,iew published by the Service in the Federal Register (40 FR 12297). On December 30, 1982, the · Service announced in the Federal··· Register (47 FR 58454) tbat tbe Cape . · Fear shiner, along witb 147 other fish specieS,'WSS being considered for.": possible addition to tbe list of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. On April 4, 1985, the Service notified Federal, Sta_te, and local governmental agencies 8.nd interested parties that the Asheville Endangered Species Field Station Was reviewing the species'· status. That notification requested · -infonnation ori the species' status·and · threats to its continued existence. Twelve responses to the April 4, 1985, notification were received. The COE, Wilmington Distric~ North Carolina Division of Parks and recreation, · Natural Heritage Program: and the North Carolina State Museum of Natrual" · ·.-History provided for tbe species. . Concern for the species' welfare w"a.s -.also expressed by private individuals: : The other respondents provided no information on threats, and did not take a position on the soecies' status. The Cape Fear shiner Was included in the · Services' September 18, 1985, Notice of re,iew of Vertebrate Wildlife (50 FR 37958} as a category 1 species, indicating that the Service had substantial biological data to support a proposal to list the species as endangered or threatened. · Summary of FaCtors Affecting the Species : Section 4(a)(l) of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and regulations (50 CFR Part 42-1) promulgated lo implement the listing provisions of the Act set forth the procedures for adding species to the Federal Lists. A species may be determined to be an endangered or threatened species due to one or more of the five factors described in section 4{a)[l)c These factors and their application to the Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocho/as) are as foilows: A. The present or threatened destructioil,· mod1fication, or. curtailment of its habitat or range. A review of historic collection records (Snelson 1971, W, Palmer and A. Braswell personal communication 1985), along with recent survey results (Pattern and Huish 1985, 1986), indicates that the Cape Fear shiner is presently restricted to only three populations (see "Background" section). Three historic populations have apparently been extirpated (Pattern and Huish 1985, 1986). Robeson Creek, Chatham County, was believed lost when Jordan Lake flooded part of the creek. The reasons· for the loss of · populations from Parkers Creek and· Kenneth Creek in Harnett County are not known. The shiner has also not been rcc.ollected (Pattern and Huish 1985) from ihC Cape Fear. River· in Harnett · County. ·However, review of historical -and current collection reCords i-evCals· · that only· One specimen ha·s ev€r been : collected from Ibis river, and tbe fish likely was a stray individual from an . upstreain or tributary population. Since · much of the Deep, Haw. and Cape Fear Rivers and their major tributaries has been impounded for hydroelectric .. power: and much o(tbe rocky sho~l habitat inundated, other populations and populatio·n segments that were never di~covered pave likelY been lost to. these reservoirs .. · ·_ Of the three remaining populations, only the one located around the · confluence of the Deep and Rocky Rivers in Chatham and Lee Counties (inhabiting a total of about 7.3 river -miles).appears strong (Pattern and-Huish 1985). The second population in the Rocky River. above tbe Rocky River hydroelectric facility, was !he source of tbe type specimens used to describe the species (Snelson 1971). Historic records (W. Palmer and A. Braswell. personal communication 1985} reveal that collections of 15 to 30 specimens could be expected in this stretch of the Rocky River (Slate Roule 902 or Chatham County Road 1010 Bridge) during a sampling visit in the late 1960s ar:.d early 1970s. Pattern and Huish (1985) sampled the Rocky River throughout this reach on numerous occasions and were able to collect only one specimen." The reason for the apparent decline in this population is unknown. The third population, localed in the Deep Rh·e; system in Moore a·nd Rundolph Counties, is represented by the collection of six individuals (Pattern nnd Huish 1986). Three in<li\'iduals were taken from below tr.e dam. As the available habitat below the dam is· limited. it is believed these fish Ore mig:-ants from the upstream population. • Potential threats to· the species and its habitat could come from such activities as road construction, stream cha.noel · · modification, changes in stream flows for hydroelectric power,'impoundments, land use changes, wastewater discharges, and other projects_ it1.the watershed if such 8.ctivities ·are not · planned and implement wi".h the survival of the species and the protection of its habitat in mind. The . species is also potentially threatened by two U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. projects presently under rCview for the Deep River. The Randleman Dam · project would consist Of a resef1{oir 9f . tbe Deep Rh-er in Randolph County, · above known·cape Fesl" shiner" h3_bitat.· The Howards Mill Reservoir would be on the Deep River in Moore' ilnd Randolph Couniies and would flood presently use_d Cape Fear shiner habitat. B. O'Veru/i/ization for comm.el"Cia/, , recreatlonc/, ::ci!:1r.tific, or educDlionQJ purp0ses. Most of the pi-esCnt rarlge· of ... · the Cape Fear shiner is ·relatively inaccessible and overutilization_of the . species has not been and is not . expected.to be a problem. . , ... , C. Disease or predation. Although tlie Cape Fear shiner is undoubtedly consumed by predatory animals, there is no evidence that th~s predation is a: · threat to the species. D. The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms. No;th Carolina Stale law (Subsection 11:,...272.4) prohibits collecting wildlife and fish for scientific Purposes without a State permit. However. this State law does no·r • protect the species' habitat from .the potential impacts of Federal actions. Federal listing will pro\·ide protection for the spedes under the Endangered Species Act by requirir.g a Federal permit to take the species and requiring Federal agencies to consult with the Ser\'ice when p:ojects they fund, authcrize, or carry out may affect the species. E. Other natural or mar.made factors affecting its conlinL·ed existence. The major portion of the best Cape Fear shiner population is located at the juncticn of the Deep and Rocky Rivers in Chatham and Lee Counties. A mnjor toxic chemical spill at the U.S. Highv:ay 15-105 Bridge upstream of this site on I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 13~ ·, Friday, July 11, 1986 / Proposei R'ules 25221 the Rocky Ri\'er could jeopardize this population, and as the other populations are extremely small and tenuous, the species' ·survival could be threatened. The Service has carefully assessed the best scientific and commercial information available regarding the past. present, and future threats laced by this species in determining to propose this rule. Based on this evaluation, the preferred action is to list the Cape Fear shiner (Notropis mekistocho/as) as an endangered species. Because of the species' restricted range and vulnerability of these isolated populations to a single catastrophic accident. threatened status does not appear to be appropriate for this species {see "Critical Habitat" section for a discussion of why critical habitat is being proposed for the Cape Fear . shiner). · Critical Habitat Critical habita~ as defined by section 3 of the Act means: (i) The specific areas within the geographical area occupied · by a species, at the time it is listed in 8.ccordance with the Act, on which are found those physical or biological features (I) essential to the conservation· of the species and (II} that may require special management considerations or protection, and (ii) specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by a species at the time it is listed, upon a determination that such areas are essential for the conservation of the' species. . . . Section 4(a)(3} of the Act requires that critical habitat be designated to the · maximum extent prudent and determinable concurrently ·with the determination that a species is endangered or threatened. Critical habitat is being proposed for the Cape Fear shiner to include: (1) Approximately 5 miles of-the Rocky River in Chatham County, North . Carolina: (2) approximately 8 miles of Bear Creek, Rocky River, and Deep River in Chatham and Lee Counties, North Carolina; (3) approximately 8 miles of Fork Creek and Deep River in Randolph and Moore Counties, North Carolina. (See "Regulation Promulgation" section for this proposed rule for the precise description of critical habitat.) These stream sections contain gravel, cobble, and boulder substrates with pools, riffles, and shallow runs for adult fish and slackwater are.is with large rnck outcrops and side channels and pools for juveniles. These areas also provide water of good quality with 1;~Jr.tively low silt loads. Section 4(b}(8) requires, for any pruposcd or final regulation that designates critical habitat, a brief description and evaluatioil of those activities (public or private) that may. adversely modify such habitat or may be affected by such designation. Activities which presently occur within the designated critical habitat include, in part, fishing, boating, ·scientific research, and nature study. These activities, at their present use level. do not appear to be adversely impacting the area. There are also Federal activities that do or could occur within the Deep River Basin and that may be affected by protection of critical habitat. These activities include~ construction of impoundments (in particular, U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers reservoirs under study for the upper Deep River}, stream alterations, bridge and road. · construction, and discharges of municipal and industrial wastes, and hydroelectric facilities. These activities could, if not.carried out with the protection of the species in mind, degrade the water and substrate quality of the Deep River, Rocky River, Bear Creek, and Fork Creek by increasing siltation, water temperatures, organic pollutants, and extremes in water flow. If any of these activities may affect the critical habitat area and are the result of a Federal action, section 7(a)(2) of the Act, as amended, requires the agency to consult with the Service to ensure that actions they authorize, fund, or_ carry · out, are not likely to destroy or . adversely modify critical habitat. · . Section 4(b)(2) of the Act requires the Service tO consider e·conomic and othe·r impacts of designating a particular area as critical habitat. The Service will consider the critical habitat designation in light of all additional relevant information obtained at the time of final rule, Available to Conservation Measures Conservation measures provided to species listed as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act include recognition, recovery actions, requirements for Federal protection, and prohibitions against certain practices. Recognition through listing encourages and results ln conservation actions by Federal, State, and private agencies, groups, and individuals. The Endangered Species Act provides for possible land acquisition and cooperation with the States and requires that recovery actions be carried out for all listed species; Such actions are initiated by-the Service following listing. The protection required of FederaJ agencies and the. prohibitions against takillg and harm are discussed, in part, below. Section 7(a} of the Act, as amended, requires Federal'agencies to evaluate· their actions with respect to· aily species that is propOsed or listed as endangered or threatened and with respect to it critical habitat, if ariy is being proposed or designa_ted. Regulations i_mplementing this intcragency cooperation provision of the Act are codified at 50 CFR Part 402 (see revision al 51 FR 19926: June 3, 1986). Section 7(a}(4) requires Federal agencies to confer informally with the Service on any action that is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a proposed species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitat. If a species is subsequently listed, section 7{a}(2} · requires Federal agencies to ensure that activities they 8uthorize, fund. or carry out are not likely to jeopardize the · •. continued existence of such a species or to destroy or adversely modify its critical habitat U a Federal action may affect a listed species or its critical habitat, the responsible Federal agency must enter into consultation with the Service. The Service is presently aware of only two Federal actions under consideration (Randleman and How8rds Mill Reservoirs} that may affect the · species and the proposed critical . habitat The Service has been in contact--with the U.S. Anny Corps of Engineers concerning the potential impacts of, , . .-. these projects on ·the species ·and its : :"':· · habltat. The Act.arid implementing ·' :'° ·· .. regulations found at 50 CFR 17.21 set· forth 8 serieS ·of gen_er.il prohibitions· and·~:._·: .. exceptions that apply to alle_ndaI1gei-ed · . wildlife. These prohibit[ons, in part, :, ... . make it illegal ·for any person subjeci· to the jurisdiction of the United Stales to take, import Or export. s~ip in interstate ... . · commerce in.the' course of c·omm.ercial :. · activity, or sell or offer for sale In interstate or foreign commerce any listed species. It also is illegal to . prossess, sell, deliver, c8.rry, transpOrt, or ship any such wildlife that has been taken illegally. Certain exceptions . · · would apply to agents of the Service and State conservation agencies. Permits may be issued to carry out otherwise prohibited activities involving endangered wildlife species under certain circumstances.· Regulations governing permits are at SO CFR 17.22 and 17.23. Such permits are available for scientific purposes, to enhance the propagation or survival of the species, and/or for incidental take in connection with otherwise lawful acti\•ities. In some instances, permits may be issued during a specified period of time to relieve undue economic ~ardship that would be suffered if such relief were not available. il ij ! l ; 25222 Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 133 / Friday, July 11, 1986 / Proposed Rules Public Comments Solicited The Service intends that any final action from this proposal will be as accurate and as effective as possible. Therefore, any comments or suggestions from-the public, other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific community, industry,_or any other interested party concerning any aspect of this proposal are hereby solicited. Comments particularly are sollght concerning: · (1) Biological, commercial trade, or other relevant data concerning any threat (or lack thereof) to this species; (2) The location of any additional populations of this species and the reasons why any habitat should or should not be determined to be critical habitat as provided by section 4 of the Act· . (j) Additional information·~oncerning the range and distribution of this species; · (4) current or planned activities in the subject area and their .possible impacts on this species; and (5) Any foreseeable economic-and · . other impacts resulting from the. . proposed designation.of critical habital Final promulgation of the regulations on this species will take into -· .. ,: . · coll.sideration the comments and any -· . additional information receiVed by the • Service, and ·s_uch Communications may .. lead to adoption of a finalregulation · · that differs from.,this proposal. Sciootffic name The Endangered Species Act provides for a public hearing on this proposal, if requested. Requests must be filed within 45 days of the dale of the proposal. Such requests must be made in writing and addressed to the Endangered Species Field Office, 100 Otis Street. Room 224, · Asheville. North Carolina 28801. National Environmental Policy Act The Fish and Wildlife Service has determined that an Environmental Assessment. as defined under the authority of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, need not be prepared in connection with regulatiOns adopted pursuant to section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. A notice outlining the Service's reasons for this dcterminatiori was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 1983 (48 FR 49244). References Cited North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Commuµity oevelopment. 1983. Status of Water Resources in the Cape Fear River Basin. 135 pp. Pattern, G.B., and M.T. Huish. 1985. Status sllrVey of the Cape Fear shiner {Notropis ... mekistocho/as). U.S. Fish and Wi,ldlife_ . Service Contract No. 14-16-0009-1522._'44 · pp. Potterri. G.B .• and M.T. Huish. 1986. Supplement to the status survey of the · Cape Fear.shiner {Notropis mekistoCho!aS}. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Contract No. 14-1~1522. 11 pp. Snelson, F.F. 1971. Notropis mekistocholos. R new cyprinid fish endemic to the Cape Fear River basin, North Carolina. Copeia 197~:449-462. Author The primary author of this proposed rule is Richard G. Biggins, Endangered Species Field Office, 100 Otis Street. Room 224, Asheville, North Carolina 28801 (704/259--0321 or ITS 672-0321). Llst of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and threatened·wildlife; Fish, Marine· mammals. PlantS . . , (agriculture]. · · ... · ·. · .. · · Proposed Regulations Promulgation. PART 17-{AMENDEDJ Accordingly, it is hereby proposed to amend Part 17, Subchapter B of Chapter I, Title 50 of the Code of Federal . Regulations, as set forth below: . . . 1. The authority citation for Part 17-, · continues to read as follows: · Authority: Pub. L 93-205, 87 St~t. 884; Pub. L 94-,!59. 90 Stal 911; Pub. L 95-002;92 Stal 3751: Pub. L 96-159, 93 Stat. 1225; Pub. L 97- 304, oo s_t~L 1411 (18 u.s._c. 1531 et seq.) .. :_ 2.11 iil,-proposed to amend § 17.ll(h] .. · by adding the following, in alphabetical order tinder '.'FISHES," to the Llst of• · ' · Endangered and Threatened Wildlife: • . . . . .. ·'··· :. . § 17 .11 Endangered ~nd threat~ned · · wildlife. · • • (h) • ~ • . HlstOlic range Vertebrate """"'"""'--endangered or ·.When listed Critical . .....,. threat600d F1SHt:s SNnor.".CapeFear·_· ~··~--Notropis~•---~.~(NC)-~----·Entirc, ____ •---17.95(e) NA 3: It Is furth~r pr~po~~d to iim~nd § 17.95(e) by adding critical habitat of the "Cape Fear shiner," in the same. alphabetical order 3s the species occurs in § 17.ll(h). . . § 17.95 Critical habitat-fish and wildlife. (e) ~ • • . . . Cape Fear Shiner·: (Notropis mekistocholas) (1) North Carolina. Chatham County. Approximately 4.1 niiles of the Rocky River from North Carolina State · Highway 902 Bridge downstream to _Chatham County Road 1010 Bridge; (2) North Carolina. Chatham and Lee Counties. Approximateiy 0.5 mileS of . Bear Creek, from Chatham County Road 2156 Bridge downstream to the Rocky River, th~n downstream in the Rocky River (approximately 4.2 miles] to the · ·· · Deep River, then· dowristream in fue . Deep River (approximately'2.6) in Chatham and Lee Counties, to a point 0.3 river miles bClow the Moncure, North Carolina, U.S. Geological Survey Gaging Station; and . · (3) North Carolina. Randolph and Moore Counties. Approximately 1.5 · ' . miles of Fork Creek, from a poi~t 0.1 creek miles upstream of Randolph County Road 2873·Bridge downstream to the Deep River then downstream appoxiffiately 4.1 miles to the Deep River in Randolph and Moore Counties. North Carolina, to a point 2.5 river miles below Moore County Road 1456 Bridge. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I Federal Register / Vol. 51, No. 133 /. Friday, July 11, 1986 / Proposed Rules 25223 Constituent elements include clean streams with gravel, cobble,_and boulder substrates with pools, riffles, shallow runs and slackwater areas ~ith large · rock outcrops and side channels and ~ pools with water of good quality with relatlvelY low silt Joads. Dated: May 30, 1986. P. Daniel Smilb.. · Acting Assista'rit Secretary for Fish and . Wildbfe and Pai-ks.. -. . . - fFR Doc. a&-15&13 Filed 7-1{µ)6; a:4s a;,,J BIUING CODE 431·)·5~ : ... ·.". ,:·>.'.'\\.'.",_'•' . ;;:;;: _,_''. ,;·1-~ ·:·-~::=":'• :." -· -• -_ : · -~ . ;>ex" L> ·.t;;: . ., _ . . ·:;··::·:,··Y: . ·.", --~---. _;_:'(:.~~1:'( ,.; ·. ' ·· ... ·. -,.,,; ;~:'_:-: --·: -... ·-~':~~~;{\~~-.. ·:_·;. :':;~--: ,- ·•.'.:,\~:;.t:\-_ :.,, .. :·:-:._,_ ..••. : :·_ -~~ :,;,.-_ "·' ! ·----'i ... ,<1/\·:_:_._ .-· ,. t.1 I I I I I .. ;;.-} ... ;:, . ' ~.\. I W(l L RECORD NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF WATER ANO DIVISION OF GROUND WATER B BOX 2704B · IIALEl(;l_ N. C . Reg. No. 7 I. To"" ,41.or.LiA..><.,...>...u,cc______ Co1,nty Loc•t lo"_:___...._.~--+->'--'-"'--~-----------------Q11aor1ngle Ho. Sllow 1 1k,tcll of location on btck of for• Ol(ILLING LOG J, o.,11., LcwiA Sf ... ,1ehn.•1tlfl .. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. "· "· "· 11- &ddr••• !i!ll __ (.'_.0,J.:..Uli.ll!l--'l>C'----------- TopOQrtPlly; o,,,.., tloPt, hil)jop, v,llty, flit :in Jrnd ShAlc lf----t---; l6u 01 •• 1 1llortl!';"' 1 i r Date Cc.Pl, tad 2-1 7 -7·~ -.JQ_ ---1.20 ..li.1,1.d-$11.nd..(. 4-'111 ?---· ---· 111 t,11• or .. n,od_=~-----'Total Otptll" .. t2.5 .... :: __ ~ .-12Q__,_J-'UJ~ (i,·n:c =::i·1~u.tJ.-- lrovl '. i'.t.e:.! R!.le· _Gl __ in. Ntttri1! .!.ill UA Iv, ,,~ ,, " '") -"--"· CP ·:I'll t ,,,-.. : Jl_!!fl~ _Q_!..!!!.:_ T re• and opc~n.i!!..1_ ,,~ " ft. '"· Wet tr [011•~ (JUlll) \?r-, 1bo._,e· ft. bel.61o1 toi> of cuin11 wtll<:11 ,, _ __J ____ ft, ■ b o . , , c land s~rface. Elev.--·--- 01ll __ ;;!-=.1.li;:7L''-•---------------- fi,IO (9P'": _..!,_ __ lilethod of tHtirig __ cAcicr~----- •t _ _l____ QP•. _j_1._Q ___ 2..2!:i... 1 -1ied .. !:ilUlds..Lo..u _____ .. f--7 --· "' ,, D s I I ' ' --------t----"-"'~------ ---j---------- 1 -+----,1----------------j-------- ---L-_-=i---; ------- ---1------------ I ·---1----------- Ill. Wiler Qij4lity Tnpera tu re (0F) ______ ff----f-----l------------ 1!1. Wtll stuiliutlon .sethod f' h 1 i 16. !'tr••nent P~•,: __ fype ______ Mlll.e _______ ~----+---+----------- Ref. 46 - <:::---!:' ..... .:::.. ;,..__ ' (·"- !"' - -' - - - - - --- I I I I I .... · .f • •,• ~ .. ' _.:.' ' j l I I IWRlll CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATUHAL ANU ECONOMIC RE:;OURCES !wEl.L RECORD! OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES GROUND WATER DIVISION P. 0. BOX 17687 ~ RALEIGH. N. C.17611 2.B.J.LJ.Jllic•~ '=nG _____ _ ~ "" 1-00M -,-:::;---.-1.QJ MAI.IQU.0[.S(;_fi!J~TION 10-25-72 0 22 clny DATE: ~------11---__________ _ 22 150 shnl, ___ TOU.l O[PTH _l.5.Q~.--RIG TVP[ OR M[THOO: -·~••<----lf---+---+-c---~-~-------- 8,,--f011M.Ul()"4 SAMPLES •i.\t__!l~l'-G: _,, ! Wal\ tl\i(t. " ,,m_,_u __ ~~I'.!~~ !1 0mm _=a_ ~.!..!,!. ___u_ f-•-·---· f I I .f -----"-'-L'--'---- 10. (iH(;Lll: Q!:I'.~ ~ Mt!Md 1-------·- r,am _ _Q __ •c.~ !• ~l ___ .Pc""~P~-- --------1------· Trllf 0n(IQ91ninq 1-----t--·------------------ " ----~--I-------·-----------------~--- 2!..e.!!! ~ ---------------------- F•~m _____ r-0 _____ t, ------------------;::...._;::--------11 '.,JATIC 'frlAllfi L['(Ll ____ l..'i__tr belo• •o~ of C~linQ. Co,<~_; ,, __ I __ ,, ,,c,u,e Ion~ ,udoce. HEV ____ _ -------------------- ~•!.tf "'[A<;Uf!f[, _______ ··-·-----------•----1---•---___ _ 1•, ,1u.1,1i~,.,1 ..• z __ ., •~o,,co Of 1r.srrNr. _ __hl_o.w Test ~·tnu;: J.:00 r,pm ;,,,._.p,/,(', ""-'t" Ll."/[L:_~_f,. o!,., ______ hdu'\ gpm "' _________ Q~"' " C••L0NINA!,QN T,p,_______.!!!.~ ___ AmouM 14 tablets l':20 >------------- 1.: Jll .. ____ •. ________ T(MP(RATVIIE("FI __ f-------------------------------- I~ P(RMANOH PtJMP,l~ho,. a lh!Ch of ••II hood oe bac~ ot to,m) f--------· -·-··-·--· --···-•··. ---------- 0a•o 1~,,ollod ____ Tyg, _____ lola""-----1r- C;;o,1,, ···•--------(;pm) HP _______ IL __ f-----·-.. ----·-r-... 1·--.--.. , ,-----_----·----lLLbJ'VEE)-- I I I I I,., ., "";,ii !.: .... ,,.,., ... .l :,,::-l, . -. ,, •\ I ,- ! .~ J [\l_[Ll RECORD I Wlll!/1 U\HOLl:M i)t:i',\f!Wi:.'ll [IF fjl,i!IPM. t .. :; r.coi'i:1.1:1c DIV]Slotl or [!N[ROW1[NTAL ~J,:M!ilJ'.L:n GHOUN~WA 1 EH S[CT ION r,o, ROX 27637 -RltL(!rJH, !I.(, :'./&11 Heater Well Co . 1. WT.I.!. 1,WAT!(\'l: ($ho..r Sl.t•tch o! the l<>CJt1on t,(')o..,) ile11r"H T()'-'fl: ___ M_o_r_r_,_· _s_v_1_-_1_,_•~: _______ _ c0 ,.,,1 .,. , W_a_k_•--== 0 ______ _ ~orr~ll's trove Rd. near ·Airport· IRo.,d,Co,,.,.,unily or :;ul,divi~ion and l.Ot so, l i. owtlf;~, Triangle Crate Repair Service 1. ,-m,nss, 304 Cary St., Car:1..-1 N.C. 27511 4. Tlll'oc.;li.APli~: ~ val l,•y, slope, hilltop, flat (c i,cle om•, s. usr. nr ,;1:c.1., Office n11.n:: 8-29-77 ... ,,t,•1·i.,1 r, ()~. _Q__ I<• ...2_0_ ! l c..e.me..rtL JlJJl~-- lu.,. .'·Mt,•ri.•1 ;y;·••-----\".>;••~• •.;· ____ <,;pr.I lll' __ __________ < ,.,_.,~ •• l'"•pt,, __ _ 11,,,. 1111· 1>1·::,,'l.wJ •11, !'t",';] !,•·,, i• ,·1 -11:L_ ''""', ..... ,, .. "". ·-T ,u__1 _________ . __ _ _3,:.;_·:·.y· .. ) ~:7=1=' :c·:!.....::·'::··~=-:'c_=c:===C"J ________ 1,n1_1.1.111r; 1,• --·····-···---····-·· ur.r ;11 . -·ppi'iT,'""""" -~ ______ roP.-1,.11<,:i_n1:sc-1111•1·10:1 f---"~---:."c'-----"c"=nd clnv .in l('lli ~----------------·--- ~lnl • ) <;. _ __ ./ .. ~ ...... ;,,,1: " --~-:-~·, ~ ·i: .. , :.:1"i,!~~~~:;r("(..l . ...,,'f_i .. -( •·:s-r:~!ffl\~;,'-~~f~~~l!~~~'!\~~-%~~~~--~-~.h t".>r;.'.~;t rr•tpJ·!f"t:>!!-P,~~:-;: r-r~•fi'•·-·~t., ' I I I I I I .. _,..... . !:0!·:111 CAROLINA DEPMiTMEIH OF NATUHAL ANO ECONOMIC RESOURCES lv<El.L RECOR!~ OFFICE OF WATER ANO AIR RESOURCES GROUND WA (ER DIVISION P. 0. BOX 17687 -RALEIGH, N, C. 2;511 Al!(JHlss·_B,_t_!. . .1.-' Box 255, Morrisville,_ H -••.. --,lAIJillt_D!..St;RleI!Off __ _ US. o, W(LL .J.ioµie. ___ oArr: ____ L0 .. =..2.9..::..1..fi_lf--0~+~)0.5~+-cccl=.ca~v• ________ _ 00t Sf~~ ,W(ll 1rf.f't.ACt: AN OISTING WlLL? no 15 11;0 shale r ' !OIAL O(P'lH ·---_ 16 0 ) ,:uc TVP( OR MC rttoo: -"•"1.· .r ___ ,,---+----+--------~----- ~. fOIIOUTION !AIM'.[S COLL[CTf.:0 r.=Jns No.of 809•----,e----t----t--------------- 1\l Gllour: ~~ ~ 1111111<>4 r,o.,._____Q_ lo _ ____l,Q_ , , cemen t, __ b=l,ow=.i,n.g~ hPt Pfld 0111nma " •l. GA•vCL ,, .... ____ .. ---" 1 l "'ATCIII l0/<t£S(de;,1~l ______________ _ 70' II---+----+------------ " t---------·-----·---- Col'"'l ;, ___ 1,. a~o•~ lond •~do, •. [l.[V, ____ _ ---------+-------------- 0 '1[ MlASURl':0: ------·-----------II---+---j--------------1~ •1HJlop,,,1 ____ 2_ 1,1[r1100 or nsrri.G· blowing " ________ ... 1r. Cl"I..OlltN.UION: T1p, ___ ~ll0T0l0J __ Am,,..n, ______ _ -· 1------f--------··---------- ltl. *AHII OU'-1.HY _____ l[MP[RAlUR[(•f"I __ -------t----- c,~oc,,, __________ (qpml 11P ________ 1------- •-•o•• Oop•• _ --~----,1,.,.,_, O,plh -----· 1;1wu In ;·,-,\ [ LP OIi". ---•----·-• ••• ···-----I ,,_-, liid.l.!@. ti. C. I:• ". i: F~-r41,..,_:r.?';;,r~\"-7'~ Ji,';t'·~~~:~~.~~~\ff.~~~'.Tlr-t~•:.1,-:.'"'~:r·: ~i~A'!~~p.,1•r•:-r,~·· ~ .~ ~ir~:-: I I I I I I I I ' ' . -~ ..... ,f:J•--i;--\ I . •i·j ;,,;1· ,;.{t.:~ ;::~ ·>· l l I I I I ! ! I ' I I rmRIII CAHOLl:rn ]l[f'i\f:TM[/11 OF 11!\IURM. 11;m [CO:IGr-',I( P(S(llJR((S uIv1sImi or EINJRmmrn1AL rJ•;1Ar.;rn1.1n i '<lll RECORD) GROLillDWAT[R SECT 10!1 / /) /.6 (J P.O. BOX 27G87 -RAlllC.H, 11.C, 1/Gll y\ r<. 1'.1 'J 0 1. o;.-i.;i.:11, _...Hun...Dl.&.l..la.n, ___________ _ 1. ..,1,[l/!1:;s, 5601 Lrunbshire DR •• ___Rale.J.gh_._N.C , . T<l!'<>C~Al'IIY: dt .w, v., 11.,,,., 11!,,i-,.,, Iii 1 lt<>eo,: l.,t !<..~7c~P'3n,,J r,,,,,_O_t,, _l!_ [1',,. r,,,c• __ ,, __ ,, I I. STA'! I• ,,,,•n:i• 1.1:v1:r ; ---1Q_ It. i,'.;{:;:1 ''I' c,i _.,.,,, .,., t•,,~iw: ,~ _l_t' .,I,<>,·•• 1,>ncl sur:,,~c• l:Lt:'l: I!,. f'll.'ll·l'' ;,,\1T~ 1.t:•:, i : ___ ft ,1/1, , ___ 1,,·,n1:, .,, -----,1p.• .. J;, Cltl.t1f!!tJ!,Tl0tl: -r;-1,,• H1'1f /\mc"wt _____ _ .-; .. , • : ' • ;,.,•. '-'" ~ ·•·c! ! •'·"' "•l :· . ... J; l ~ . J. /~ll .:·-.!~---~:.' .. rf''······ F====='c-"ec·-c::Y=c --/_:~,:'EL .. ~-"' f.... ----·-----~''c"o'c'·'c·1c'c"~'•',:c'c· _______ _ Dl:l'Ti• l._o~_,_1 __ _.Sllll!I cl"" 1 <;_ 'lr,f'\ D ,,tl_.U,lJU.,"-____ -l I I I I I ,-;.· ' -•-·•i, ·: j 'J,'i,J ----IIC------1-----1-----------------•O. ll"OU. t.!i'.'.:: " " ,,. ,,o ... ~-,.,_l,e_ __ --- ' ~ " .:t!..!. ~ lop of c<>1,.19 ~-----· --- O.ie !~l!Oll•f _______ T,oo _______ i.a•• -----ll---- Cooa<i1, ____ ---·-·· ·-·-·---(9P"'l HP---------11----1---1 .. 10•• r"1p1, _______________ A .. i.~, 0•~•~ -----1 :,f "~~ ,..,, ,,; -, ~-_.,,.,! .,, 1,1 ·, .,, .. ~ ... ,: --],..>-~<-- -i . ~Jc;i~_.,_, __ L!1.: 11 '7,, /l'f'."I I .:.Ti ttiA~ c .... , 1.·,,:,, .. ,.-1 .,,: :1,1 1,. i'! i~'-'""'"'O">'-T1''l!/"""-"""'''"''•. •''-s :-;''."""''~"""'"°"~'"·~,••••• . ., •· .,._, . -·• > I ·1 I ' j 1 :i . i 'l ' ' ' J ' s ; ' ( ·, .., .-..,.. ~ ., i~ P,, .. :'.: ,. ;} !~: ' f ~ -:- ' I \ ';.1 l \ ' \ \ ' l - - - -- I I I I ; f· . , ,, ! I /lORTII C!,R0!.111,\ OEPARlMENT or NATUliAL ,\11/J ECOIIO!l!C R[S(1UllC[S OFFICE OF I/ATER AND AIR llESOURCES lwELL R[CORoj GROUND WATER DIVISION P. 0. BOX 27687 -RALEIGH, N. C. 2/GI I ~~~~~~~._,=Uc.;i.L~.:=.~~i,:.--1...l,,,_,,_Cp~.== k(G~ No. = =gm~~L\9.!Lf'L~II !i:L--==--~ l L ~G~::,r~,, 15:..{o"r'F'C~;·v1 fl2/," 0 "_~_ 0_:,~'.~~~~---·-•--«-----Co<,nt~. Wa),:c~---------· . 01cJ. .. tlp1ri..-syil !J.-~Rd ··--·-----·1-·····-·-·-----------'Ju~d•OnQI• No, __ :J_-_~LJ........,,-'&-__ (,,.,;:;;;~-Ot.t.o .Li~ns~T"~1 ',. 0 ' __ " __ ~~::·:_ 0 :__~-~~----~-==----_ ----_ . _ -______ _:__ .-----~---·--,,.1,[J .. l~~· . ..nt· ... l ,_11or.r isy i.U~_.,_ HJ~ _ _,_ __ f.22..0 --------··rDrlJL1.lli..Q__!K G T<.~'1.)<].flJ,f't}(.OJ~a/ ~o~a.y. ,lapo, ~••110~. frat _ffiOM. .• ~~Q-.--1---.. ,-!.0llM,1!1.Q!j OLSCR~f•IJON. us, or .. uL· .. hOUlJ..!. 1.JAlr· ~-:2.:-3.J __ . __ O_ .• 25 __:. _ __c:luy_JJ.l,d_g.rJ.n.ll:Q [, IU!AI lJ!P1't •... 50 !'Ir; 1 ,f'l 'JI< t.,fJHOO ___ air.. ... , __ _ ,-----'(1 , r,:,rr,r,: ',---~r:~--,,..,,,. 0. --·•.;=_1.5 ____ ., ~ .,.,,, ,;;,A.It ~ ~ i ,.,~.. re ',Tnl•(.. .... All.ti Uvtl -~ __ Q ___ r, ~~~- co .. o~ ...• l ___ ,, "t"•' 1-,~~ '"''"• ,~~ ~, co,,n•J I fl (V ----·•· ·•--i .'I'est: .. t imc: __ . __ _ .l:10 v.m •. _.-: __ .2Q .urnn .. -1.'..?_Q_E~~l.l_--20 IJE!!! __ ._ .l.:J0~_p.111. -20__1Jpru __ r~~-~--~~- ··· .-.: ,. :.:·,:;,/ 7 ,>;>>~ ---· .. G :L. _ 1 ---------·--- ---·-·--_c._r :..L.. .. -------- p,.rr "'I A~u,i1:n _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ f- ,11 l 1,• i~'"' ... 2.Q ... _ -..t 1,.,:.,,, :,, ri.~1,1,.:_ blowin'.l ____ . __ l-=-:-=~ __ .:, ulf•1N.:.r,0•1 T ,~, ___ f!'l'lL _____ . ..o. .... na•••l.O._ta.b.Le ta. ·-f '"' - . ---·--·---... ,, •• ---- ··,.•.,,1 .. ,., -. _ lW"-) ,,,~ ·---··------- ···-·-·· "'""n• O,~,a ---------·· ,,/ ' (,-.!-7} '.',;,:i ,--- ' I I I I _:\ ,.'. ,,. ; ' : i I I WELL fE.:D GD!-'J-'l.ETJ.OH: Hr.1.i ,_ ekut,ch fh1,1le, vunto, of tho a.cco1u1 ',,'t}l) llOUd Cll1W1hfi f!(,r.1:.,:, !'Jl~jl port, grout, 01.,l u:,cloPuro. \IEU Li:CATION: . ' Drav a l.:,cetloo sketch showing the <l!reetio11 and dh1t.orieo of U,o well to ,t least two (2) nearby roferen,:e po1nt.n nuch u roe.di, intersectiono and atre&IICI. Idontl!'y rOllda with ~tote Hlghv&y ro.i1 ideritifica tion mimbere. · .// ·' .-• (~~~ . .,--_.-.. / \/ /~,·. ' /(; ."f >' ..,i ' '. ,, .. J,~' ' !: I 'i .: t', 1 I I I I I WELL HEJ. D Cr.+il'I.ETION: . ' Dra11 a. okatch of _tJ:iq voll bo,,hu tohtr,11na c.uiJi,t., J...tbf' 1•1,,1,,c:, eeaJ.e, ventp~ 4000110 port, ,irout, l!IU'.I encloour-. • . ' ==,=,=====================---WELL LO'.ATION: Drav a locati:m sketch 11b(Ning the directio:i end d1eit..nc:• of'~ well to at lou1t tvo (2) 1~arby refere1.ce po I nte our.h u road•, int,sraecti..:,118 and etreau. ldent1fy roadi, w1th !it.ate IHM'.lrw7 rt.ad ident1fic6tion ouabere. i -. ·. I I t.l';:".· •.·.·. ,,·-• '·•· I I I ' I I L Ci'"''•,.,,.,, rrnrn11 CAHOLINA ll[PAllTMENT OF NATURAL Alli) ECONOMIC f·:ESOUflCES OFFICE OF WATER ANO AIR RESOURCES GROUND WATER DIVISION lwELL RECORD! : i) '"/ ~ 'rom _____ •, ____ " -· f-~ t.-,~-1 i ~Q1• •""~"•d __ fJP• ····--· , __ ,..001 _______ . __ I :,,,,.,•, ------____ ',p' ""-----------i "'••• Dor!" --·-·-·-_____ A,r;,n,_ D•P'~ ·----·•-[_ "'"•f. ,;)\, ,._,C>l ... t(l '"( Wfll ;'JW',[~ Of TH[ • t'V, '-~/~'!.-1! .1; , .. ,c, i-.. ,. 1.·r /,· !•·i'•\ 1<;/,.11•· •,;'\",, •[!i:: .. ~ ,,,,l,•,.i•l; .. 1,',•,1 •. ~:C::J,.\~~~~1•{ft~~Jjl1'f¾i?~~1!•l!ii51t¥i'l\";~J?1t':qJ!,l$?"ii'':~'h'•~c'.';'•·,"'·, 1~,;,,",'"'-,~-=~•,0··"~··••,. I I I ~LL I El ) C0MPLETl0t' 1 D1·aw a t1koteh of t.ha fWal,, veOto, acc11t10 1otoU h.11d rit.ov1rlfl t'r,olJ...:, j"lmJ> I Ii,:, .. ;, pori, v.rout, ail'\ n1,0)01>uro. -·============== \JELL LC :ATION: / N1-11e /, , , I I I ' I I I -----\· /. LL:1A>>-(... ""L·~·',;;_{.'</.. ___ --· ·-·---·· ---! Cf[', ' . i ~----... i-i ,. I . ----!--I ----------· --- ,.,., ..... ( ... t~,-1•1·'''' __ , __ fI_i:'_.!.'•-~. ~.111.1\f; ;,;,,pq(~[I... 2__:_, ___ 1, ·::::::. (,.,.~,j .,_. f ______ ,, ,t·'I--,.,~,) ,.,'•Jc< :.~ l! ... 1 .. ~:-,,,1 :, __ /J:c.. .. !..J:_j __ L ... -, ... , -.-····· , t l 1•(;,,·•, _ :;. '.).: ...• YU,,._,:, ,;, 1 :.~, ,,.~ r1c~ __ .. { £::..:.: ! . --i - !l i ,-, ..... :.:-l..'.:! -~---·-_ .• ,, .. , 1·· / '1 • 1' "•·1, ,er-, __ _ ,;,,,,,~1.ut, rn,• .. I •• · ... __ :_ --~-~.,.; .. ,,. __ /.:...~."t..t~-~,!.-. l . "'-ll"')U;.,,:,-___ lf.,.PfHl:.lUkL\•f! _____ I ______ _ ••II '••ul oc. l<lO ui Jo,ml !•-··· ___ 1an,, ________ , __ ' ___ _ :.,., 'I', f •• • • --·· \ ·--1:------------------------ :.-. ·. I I I I I =:=··==:="--'====---·======================== =· WELL ~OiATION: Ora\./ a J:,ci;tlon aketch aho..,in,g ·tho din,cttvn 111u1 tl\11tA1.i:c, t,r ti,Q veil to 1;1t least two (2) 'nearby refurei.ce polr,t.:i riucL ,u, rm"'•llf, intersec'!.1c,1a aJld str8&Jlt. Identify ro1:1.du 1.dt/1 5t.UJ Hll(ln.o.,r rot.ll identiffrat:i.0n nu.mbors. •• I I I I '·' I. ·1' ,;,.,, l ' --· '•, ii:. Wr~ ;ii 56l'-f*' ,., " -' • r- 1 ' r I I NOfflH CAHOLIH/1 IJEl'Almmn OF liHU!,AL Ailll ECONOMIC li[SOUI/CES lwD .. L REC01,oj OFFICE OF WIITER AIW Alll RESOURCES GROUND WATER DIVISION P. 0. BOX 17687 -RALEIGH, N. C. 2761 I R(ll NO Wf:L.L ~::~~'.s':'M9.r'.Ll';,.?J rr ~o.coH~r'l"l~~a0icit'rAa ca .... ,,: ·----411~~4~~~ ~~i~E>di,ii~dTonro·'·---------o...o.r,onui. .1~. -'-"----"--'---'--' -''----'-~•~•.,.t:R;_b' i l UW!l._:A , ... J!Mr i u;• ;teococ... _______ 1,====,======== '=========== ). ADOitt:ss:ll.-:' Box 33, Morrii;\/-lile, N, C. H------~-~llilJLIJti•,·-••""'""c... ______ _ .. - " •n ililAIJQlLD.C.S.CfU.e.Ililli __ _ DATE: __ 8_·_1_1_•_7_2 __ ___Q_ __ 1 __ 1_9 _ _,__c_l_n~y _________ _ DOf.S T•HS '!Wfll. fl[f'l,'C( AN OISTING lll'f.LL~ __ •c•co __ ,1-.,_lo9 __ 1--c',scoc...+-"'c"cecl l rock -TOT,.l {)(f'TH:_250~ RIG TlP( OR lrilITHOD: a Ir --"I'/'''-------- +~ ,,. ). fORt.U,l!Qlrl SA.W'l.[S COI..L[CT[O: CJ~[S No,ol 8oQ•---1'-----1----_j---------'--'------ Wal I !hi"' ~ ~1,1 __ 6 l____::Q !.ill _£!' 10 Gf!QuT: Q!,'~ l,Mltroul ~ r,0,.,_o __ ,. __ 20_ ,, ~nicn_t ____ Pc....."_•0p ___ \\'----1-------l·-·------·-----·-·------ I ,om ___ ,. ___ " ---------------- 200' ,~ NAT[R WNLS(o,Pl"l" ___ _:c_: ___________ JL_.~ '"" lop QI co11no. Elf:Y. ______ Jf----· -------· 4:10 -J gpro ~--'-----\.----·--'-------- ~4 tnbl l &--------~l-2...:.. -~--fil:.11_• _______ _ Amount __ c;..._..:___:_.:11 01 ___________ ,,. CHLQfllNt.Tl(JN '•P• Ill!! I ~-1"AT[R OU.II.I.IT ''--~---·------T[lilf'[RATUR[("n __ ,.._ ___ __, _______ -~_;_).Q_:....!.._g1~ .. -,-·------- " ,o. Dolt in1•0lloa• _____ T1r1 _____ Ma~, -----11----__________ ····-----___________ _ Cupaci1, ______________ (9pn,) HP _______ >---_ Ai,11n1 Dtp1h -----1 t<AV[ YOU 1'-FOlh,•EO TH[ "'ELL 01\IN[R OF TII[ ···------__________________ ,,_ c,~;!,A!Uwt \1! u,.,1 .. A!;!{JM ()M 11(,1.Nl OAT{ -,-,,..; ' ·-------~--. --·-·-·-. I c•.•· (;,. I \\'/1110.! C"ll'i•']!l,rr: t,I '/,';,!ci •IPII a\,: H,i·,r1111t,•:,; i;lut' · UH l..i~ C•ifli, 1.:ft'')il · ll1,,i.,,:, 1;,1p, ! J.; -..--:~~-!~.7n"l""'l>::---.,.t,;-~•~·F.'·~~-:::::~p,.,..;': ;"-":"~:;~~~•P,,-,,.,_.....,_, ·c--:"l"i n:-:rr~:,i.-::;:-:.':';r~,-,-.-. • ("'' ~~~ ,~~--.-.. • I I I I •,.•, • C • •• l . : .-,. ~r.1 WEU HEA.l COMFLETlOll: Dr!1V !L,ukot<ih uf:thc--~eD. lr ... aa ubo..,1,.r, cuuln,1:, pm.1p pli•:14;, ae !tla, ·vent.a, uccoue po!'.t, g:-uut, uud uncl.ouur11. ,·,,' ===: :.: WEL:, 101::ATION: Draw a location sketch a·hoving the direction and d1atanco or tho well to at .least two (2} nearhy refarence pointe ouch e.11 rocuJa, interaect.io:ie and atreams. Identify roads with State 1!1ghwo)' .. r_ot.,t identifit:a t lull nw:nbere. · ---- l)]j1t . _}-t~t/ . . · 1 ,,,, ... '::<-:::--,.,,,~:,• ... •; f;'."!""'C ,,,;~e!: f :,\'l \'''~''il1,'Jc':"'i\!t,J'!!'ll ~,r1jl\r,1&'"'1!f!:r-'l'ii''t'ffl:1!~i"P~~""'•':•~-"'.$'~~•i'Jqt,\J,{P.i;s1r,"•\,;s"-'')', .. , ... ,, .. . ' I ; I I I -~'k 1/0lilll CAHOLINA OErARTMENT OF NATUHAL AND ECONOMIC llESOJllCES !wn.L RECORD! \Jc\ I fl 1 u 20 " OFFICE OF WATER ANO Alll RESOURCES GROUND WATER DIVISION I'. 0. BOX 27687 -RALEIGH, N. C.17611 '-':•~"0! -cemcnl ~ pump l----- ·-··-----··-·---·---------------- ~ I.t.1! .. L .. ~.<LQ.~ . ."!.'lL f--·--------------·---------- !ltV _., •. _ !!TII \t, tnl,l(its . _______ A,.,Q~ro• --·---- ... --. ""'. --·--·-------- r.,,,.~, o-ri,, --·-·--·-----·· (1: tu ___ ,. .. U::'.0 ··-----···•""' 0:JU 2 gpm 2 f',.[lffi "l. gpm •:_·r.~~~!P:~~~;'.f.f'P~~~~{r4~~{:':~~j}Tt;:;;;:,~;-:·;·;•M;:4~~~~1&;,.r"~:•{;~_~,i~.,t.:?~~~!~~~;f~~WJ1ft~~t••r~~~illr:'~:i:-~~ .. r;o· I I I \..'ELL l!E. D COMPLETlON: Dr11Y ,1 olc.otch of the VfJll hon1 ll)1(1,dr1rf.: ,·nid:16', 1"-""'l' llJd1.,_·, 15a1Us. vonto, acn11:10 pvrt, grouL, 11,1d ouclu11111"0, = =•======================== WELL ~O{ lTION; Drav a locutim ale.etch ah<)·.ring th,i d\rvctlu,, t1.1.,J {11tH4:w.,, ,,J' tl.u vell to at lo1et tvo (2) nearby rri!'ur,,i,c,, v,!r:tri i,1Jt:); 11,r-:·,,,.,111, 1ntoreect1,ma and et.rea.ma. Td.ont1fy ron.,w 'J! t). ::t,s\,1 l!!l{li'"'"Y re .. ,.: identifies :.io 1 11WDbera 1 , ,l"'~;'el'~-rn'"'.',~·~-=-:-<:Jl..~ j~ ' ~• . .--. '~ . . • _, I ;- ' r,::'.U'1't,!l'~tl',~~ 1 /!'J!i r• ~g!e"l.Y,:¥:r.:i,-.r;rtr,,-~'7~~~~'~'°!' !""l',~~t.""M" ,:"7,17'!',t;;:"", --.f~'i r...-· ......... "~t,, ! ..• , .· :iA'::-~.-•."'::>;.-r•--... ~, .· .-,_ . :· 'f•. •; ., -. . ' I I I •-:•;;~'.; "!lllt• L•i~) · l/llJu' 1,1 "·"': ,'I": 1"1 l,t;• .,,,.,_,. ,, 1;n,,; · 1,1 11~1~ l,1 ;r1, 1,11:,·1, · :J,,1,,·1;,~;.'.'!1·i• •---•· .. 1• :·,,,-:'-.': ... -,.~, ....... -.,·---,--'------,....-~----~---c-c------------------~ . -. - r:Olml C/dl0!.IIU1 D[FAlml[IIT OF IIIITUR/11. llillJ l:CIJIIUl,IIC RE,OURCES lwELL RECORD! OFFICE OF WATER AND AIR RESOURCES GROUND WATER DIVISION Wei I I J P. 0. BOX 17687 -RALEIGH, 11. C. 1161 I -~~~Of'lfHCT~ llt:a_~er Well CL1., Im:. l.lG. /10 .. tLL ~::,~-(S"'i1Ar'M.'0·.Pl f't'Jo,,ofr.n <c.bo(k ot form! W(LL CONs:RuCTION P(R ... IT NO Wake Counly: '54 _________ o..oaron~I~ !lo ·~t.; ,.. .. lr -------. ---···-·· ( i:l<iad' ;· C.o,,,.......,1Y-j' !~&·.r;;;r;;;;;--;,;J "[01 No 1· t"".Nt:~_!.£E1'ers Company, nc. AOC•1<Lss·.l'_._ __ ,_i,_f1:l1X B1 Hort·isville 1 N, C. 2756 f\_ __ t<J'lh,o .._f,F_Q,!!l. __ ---<~-+--~'_QJ tdAJJQtL Dt::S.CRJPJJON ___ _ 1--~----~~ _c __ l_•~Y. _______ _ om 9-28-72 (J;,.'t-~ 1><1'> .-1.ll.-Hlf'LACI.. <1-. t•ISIING "'f.LL7 I 101:u.o.1,01,i S41,1P\.E5 COLL[CTlD LJr[S No.of Bo~'----11----1- 1..---._ -··· ---------<'.J-i L.~ -------- i .. U 1':! t;;.')"T !J!~ !!'.!!!.'°2.! l.'ft~o1 r 'U" __ ..Q___ ,.,_~ 1' ~t __ -'pe_uemeer ____ 11--·-··-·--· -------11•-------,-- .ll.!Jz!!'.. " " 1!!.!. ~ " -------,,---+----1-----· -·--·------· ,.:,, 11 11 lO-.[S 1 ,,.,,, i" ?c0.c..• 4_5c..' _& __ 7c5_'---------I .. .. -··-20 ~ ';JAT1C WAl[f< LlV[t ft Colo• 10p of CO\lftQ r··•· ~.-n,nQ ., ____ !__ __ !,·· ,·;::-;::,,, ,,,!ocr [\.C'I. _____ l --···· '.,•A•t: "'I.A';tJ"l!l ____ ,. __________________ ,I ) . '-I .1'E!St-·1-1rnc: -·1 :"{il)-1 1> rrpm ,,rL:•t~~"'l __ _,!.!._ ___ "'l 1-,rl;:> or T(<,T•Ntr='cw ______ 1 o ---------- -------____ I -' _Z_-' ___ I_• _> cSal_••---- 111. •4'! Fl CUAt,11 I " ~:: ... ::.[,:l~-~~~~:~~=-~·~:~'.h_._' _._._'_'_ .. _._·_·_·._:_:_:_··_'_'_·_"_'-II-__ .. I ·····-·---- (.~po(,1r _______ , l;oo-1 ,;P D•~•• ---·•--·---····-Aul;n, D,;1, ,ou , .. ,.~i.,[[l lHl ,.[Ll ·o .. -.r,-\;, ., ,q "'•""'. ' 1, ••.• .,, ,,. ', ,.,,,, ,.,,, ••If ,.,~,-1 ,'/•,,I. I;_ .. ,,,. ,. ,;, . r r. .... 1 •1 , •• ,..;•-,p.'C"?,;:tJJ;1_,;.~il-z1-1'~-~<;"µ;~,:J-·ffl1-·~•;tN::'£,tmM•-•S1ifBW,·'?:o?ff'~%:u,,,~r~t~11,<'.l'r.'':J'.!!''t~~p::•~-,~i:;i-r,:,;:·-... t • •• ••• • • • ' .' • ,✓ • ·••:••'• ·• ./~ • ,,A •n ~, ;~., '' • ,"' •r" ' ,"',~r~•,• •>!•••' '/" ,••• ...... ,>••., '•1• c ' • ••~• I 'I I I I I I \./ELI. HE,D COKPLETION1 Or,tw ~}Lotoh o~ U• w.,,,l} hoe.d -hurr.,~i'f: 1:•itl•-G, l"-'111)• 1•11,1,,.-1 OH.la, vent.11, o.cooaa pc.ll't., arout., and cmclooura. WELJ. LOCATION: Draw a lo,:11tion alr.otch 11howirl8 tha d1roct101i •nd 1.HolA11co v( U1• well to at lt1u1t two (2) 11oarby rererttace ~1r.tn cmcl, u rc..o1a, intersection,, and atrea.m,i. Identity roadt1 with :it.ate 1!1ftl'lll1 rtAil identific11tic,n OU14bore. ,,,,,..--, ( \ i: I I I I I I.,.· :·/i)! ;:.fir. :,• ;: ~•·-~. i·,.: ,. i ' I \fol I I ,1 rn l"•'I NOHTII CAROLINA DEPIIRll.l[NT OF NATURAL ANO ECONOMIC RESOJRCES OFFICE OF W/1TER AND AIR RESOURCES GROUND \'/ATER DIVISION r. 0. BOX 17687 -RALEIGH. N. C. 2761 I fleat,:r \./,:1 l Company, Inc. I ~~'.\~~~~-r~~------... -~~-~~~--'e's'.· -'','s_~-----~~T..'.!_;;:TtON...f.ff""IT NO wt-.L ~-:::.'i'7_)';'i-t~tlf1'~Jl_rr,!Q,Colf'."_t:.boc•_o'. form)-------···-----·-·--Coontr: \./nkl' --c=cccc:,,--- 1] 54 o,.-,o,-,nol, '"" l) . r r~.fl __ j:;ij·'.~: !_\"~~.-;!;1~~~7:'..r~}~~"··,:-:.:-:~:. ~Q~-~-~-- AL "''~s·!'.!(~--!)'.'~ ::-.. ~!('.~!-~'.'..~-~-1-~_._:i. c. nsc,u 9-::!5-72 ---·---------- U.JI ~ 1•11•, -.111 ~U'LA~L ;~~~,-:,1;,;,.4_~-~1•· ~-- .• ll•r; f "'f QR M!"f1t<.}Q' •------ --r·•· r,A~••,i,;, n ''.•i::~ ·r._·•·-· ----,., _______ _ ... ,,, .. ,.,, C(!ffl(!nl '.'\I .'I ,;, ✓ ----··· t,Jow ------------- 1-_-,a·,,;~_" ____ · JlfilU!N.JuO~G-· ___ ··_· __ _ ,, _":! __ L__~-,---Q~A:IO/J L•[.'.;;!;;RIP.!IOri __ i I /~:;;S( T t=-_ 20 5 .. ~l ________ ·---- red 1·ock -;c---- ·-----.. -,.,-~---- ' , r '_I ---- -----------------·--- : JO ~ ,:.",iii---- --1--·-_., 'I: t,U -~ HT/I i "'"'"•"'' .. _i_~ __ t_'.:t~~'.:~:-r----_.-), I<> ll):11ri :; _,rn . ··1 I ! ! f ,m -·1 -- li, L. ·: I'. ; . •.· --Y'" i,,'-'.Y"'~;r r·•,z;;,:;;~·F-?'!f(:1fJi'.?~rr.~•,;0t;,>;'>~i\;'f91 ci."(,i/;S",'fl"'."<'iJ.I~f~;'il~'.'J;"'.' ;-ft-:''i'Z(~'""""'' '">,CIC I I I I ',:.c1,1. [~A!l COr:.1'1...!.:TH)rl: jJ?";hl (I. nl-.<;\,c-1: ~! t.lH) .. ,,.J,i lll>i.C, l'Ll>J!l,J' utll :1w, prri·, r!J•~r,j,, f>~.110, vc1.rlo, uccutui v.1rt, &;n•ut, c.1..:l 01~!111J1H'~. --·-=======================---- WELL [.Q.'ATION1 Draw a luoa~ion aketch 11h0\o--fng Uui d1 .. oct1nu u.:1 d1•tonco ur U>. +•.:--vell to ut. ::eaet tvo (2) Marby reforaoca po1nto our.h u road•, interHct,101111 and atreaJU. Idonttr, reed• v1lh St.a.to Ht1tN&7 rc:..•l identitil:at·'.011 mmbera. (. . \. \~-\~-~\ --a '\~ 4; . .;.__. _, \. I . . ·-~~--:~.~i~r,;lrn~.:,.. ~ pr ~,kt-.,n:dk:~~,~: r=;r,~ W.2r~~t."ft#.1ti:~,~s.:-•f;~ntf-P.e.::¢\~~~fr$/1:r:-@}f~'.,1¥~t.1~!R~:kftfff.:rf%!~:!'·~;~ I . . I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -... ~ .. · ,,..., .. ~--~ .... ~· /;,,,'t" r:. ; "-1\ '~ 11 i.•·""' "' ,. '·. • ,i';11)_§i ~~-~1.J-'..~_p/ ·~~·. North Carolina Department of Human Resources Division of Health Services P.O. Box 2091 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2091 1~ --~------I I Ref. 47 I James G. Martin, Governor Phillip J. Kirk, Jr., Secretary Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H. Ms. Denise Smith EPA NC CERCLA Project Officer EPA Region IV Waste Division 345 Courtland Street, N.E. Atlanca, GA 30365 Dear Ms. Smith: SUBJECT: Summary Trip Report 22 January 1987 Koppers Co., Inc. NC D003200383 Hwy. 54 West Morrisville, NC 27560 Site Investigation, December 17, 1986. State Health Director Tne Koppers Co., Inc. site is located on a 53 acre tract on Hwy. 54 West in Morrisville, NC. A company called Unit Structures first produced glued-laminated wood products on this site around 1955 until 1962. Koppers purchased the site in 1962 and continued the glue-laminating process. From 1968 to 1975, Koppers used the southeast portion of the site for wood treatment with pentachlorophenol (PCP). Wood treatment was discontinued on site around 1976, however, laminated wood production continued. The plant was sold in September 1986. Koppers retained 10 acres of the original site including the areas where PCP contamination was known or likely to have occurred. The remainder of the site has been sold back to Unit Structures. Koppers notified as a generator, transporter at this site. However, no Part A application for interim status was filed and no closure permits have been issued. Wastewater lagoons from the PCP treatment process were closed by Koppers in 1976. The liquid from the lagoons was sprayed over a portion of a field in the northeast corner of ·the property and the sludges were mixed with soil surrounding the lagoons. Soil samples collected by Koppers in the spring and fall of 1980 led to the removal of PCP contaminated soil from the site. Subsequent studies have been conducted by Koppers and US EPA Region IV. To date, PCP has been measured in soil, groundwater, and pond sediment on site. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ms. Denise Smith 22 January 1987 Page 2 The northern portion of the site drains to a ditch which crosses under the railroad tracks and Hwy. 54 and flows to the northeast. The rest of the site drains to Koppers pond. The pond has an outlet to the south which drains to another pond on residential property across the road. City water is not.available in the area immediately surrounding the site. Residents and business are dependent on private wells for water supply. NC CERCLA Unit personnel Pat DeRosa and Mark Durway initiated a site inspection of the Koppers site on December 19, 1986. Since an on-site inspection was postponed awaiting a meeting with Koppers representatives, off-site well sampling was planned to address contaminant migration and potential public health concerns. We arrived at the site at approximately 1000 hours. We drove around the perimeter of Koppers property in order to identify and locate off-site wells previously sampled. Based on previous sampling, topography, and prior contact with off-site well owners, 6 wells were selected for sampling. We began sampling at 1115 at Triangle ~laterials approximately .5 miles southeast of the site. This well should serve as a background groundwater sample. We subsequently sampled the residential wells at the homes of James Crowe, William Barbee, George Harding, John Medlin, and Louis Barbee. These wells were purged prior to sampling except where owners cautioned us against running the well dry. Samples were collected for volatile and extractable organics, inorganics, and low concentrations of acid extractable phenolics (i.e. PCP). Samples were preserved accordingly and submitted to the NC State Laboratory of Public Health for analysis. On January 7, 1987, we returned to the site to meet with Koppers representative, Mike Dvorsky, and Jim Campbell and ~!arty Schlesinger of Keystone Environmental Resources (KER). KER works under contract with Koppers to provide laboratory services. We toured Koppers' portion of the site and obtained background information on the former PCP treatment operations. We also discussed site sampling and cleanup activities which had been conducted at the site to date. Additional sampling data and hydrogeologic information is forthcoming from Koppers and KER. If you have any questions, please contact me at (919) 733-2801. PD/tb/0338b Sincerely, ~/J-e/V-- Pat DeRosa, Waste Management Specialist CERCLA Unit Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch Environmental Health Section Fifth Editio11, 1984 North Carolina State Government Statistical Abstract North Carolina Research and Planning Services Office of State Budget and Management -··-····-· -. N u, N F lgure 29 AVERAGE JULY TEMPERATURES DEGREES FARENHEIT N, C, _ Average Maximum 87, 4 ° Minimum 65, 8° {BASED ON 30 YEAR AVERAGE) SOURCE: N.C. State University, Department of Marine, Earth and Atm::>spherlc Sciences, Office of the State Climatologist, -- - - - - - -------- ----- . ,~·· l~·:: .. ·-·· 40 F lgure 28 AVERAGE JANUARY TEMPERATURES DEGREES FARENHEIT (BASED ON 30 YEAR AVERAGE) N, C. Average Maximum 50.7° Minimum 29.0° 40 ·, I.·-··-·-··-·-·,:~"'" SOURCE: N.C. State University, Department of Marine, Earth and Atrrospherlc Sciences, Office of the State Climatologist, . ' 42 - ---- ------------ ------ : f,-:' !.,,, ? '.;;;.: ,, ,r 1:·, ','.; ~- - ~ --'-) ···.>, ..... ':,__ •,· ' -¾(1--- " (_) r-..., l',-) t;---,; ~-:-- - PUBLIC HEAL TH LIBRARY DIVISION OF HEAL TH SERVICES P. O. BOX 2091 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27602 Edi led by JAMES W CLAY DOUGLAS M. ORR, JR. ALFRED W STUART Forewad by JAMES E HOLSHOUSER, JR. The University of Nortt1 Carolina Press · Chapel Hill ·-r -----Figure 5.21. Prevailing Winds and Mean Annual Wind Speed in N.C. NE Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Climatic Summary of the U.S .• 1972. Noto: Wind speeds are noted in miles per hour. Wind speeds have been averaged for each zone of prevailing winds. Winds tend to diminish in speed westward from the coast where sea breezes and offshore storms contribute to velocities that average twelve miles per hour. Throughout the Inner Coastal Plain and the Piedmont, the mean wind speed is nine miles per hour, and in the western counties, representative wind speeds are seven and eight miles per hour. On a daily basis, wind velocities are lowest before dawn and highest around midafternoon. Seasonally, winter, with greater temperature and pressure contrasts, shows the most rapid air movement and sum·mer is the time of lowest wind speeds. Thunderstorms Thunderstorms are vertically de- veloped storm systems that involve lightning and thun- der. Produced by instability in the atmosphere, these storms are sustained by the conversion of water vapor · into rain and hail, which causes the release of enormous amounts of energy. This energy results in vigorous updratts of rapidly moving air. The intensity and turbu- lence of an individual thunderstorm is related to the degree of atmospheric instability and the supply of latent energy released by the condensing of water vapor. In structure, the typical thunderstorm is a collection of convecti~e cells each averaging a mile or more ·in diameter, A cell is comprised of columns of rapidly rising airseparated and counterbalanced by downdratts of slower moving air. Associated with thunderstorms and their bulbous facade are heavy downpours of rain, hail, gusty and squally winds, and of course. lightning and thunder. 104 ------Because thunderstorm development and frequency is enhanced by (1) atmospheric instability that is linked to high surface temperatures, (2) atmospheric moisture that supplies the latent energy requirements, and (3) some triggering device to start the convection process, . thunderstorms occur more frequently in regions of warm temperatures and high humidities. North Carolina·s climate is conducive to thunderstorm development and the state experiences violent local storms forty to fifty days each year. For the United States, Florida and the Gulf Coast lead in the number of days with thunder- storms. Here. seventy to ninety days per year with thunderstorms is normal. In the northern states and along the West Coast, thunderstorm activity drops off because of colder temperatures over land and coastal waters. North Carolina's pattern of thunderstorm activity shows fewest storms off the northeast coast where coastal waters also are cooler. Inland, thunderstorms are more frequent, increasing to fifty days as the Mountains are approached. In the Mountains, the higher frequency of storm activity (all types) and the triggering supplied by mountain and frontal slopes results in the most thunder- ous area to be found in the state (Figure 5.22). Hurricanes In the latter half of the year. the United States is visited by hurricanes. Originating over tropical oceans as small cyclones, under favorable conditions hurricanes become large, intense storm systems. Their winds exceed seventy-five miles per hour and spiral counterclockwise around an "eye" of very low pressure. Sustained by the ocean that breeds them, these storms are driven by the heat released from condensing water vapor. Covering tens of thousands of square miles, · hurricanes move slowly and deliberately, at speeds between fifteen and fifty miles pei hour, delivering prodigious amounts of precipitation to areas over which they pass. Moving out of the tropics, hurricanes of the Atlantic Ocean generally invade the Gulf of Mexico, or veer northward toward the middle latitudes, occasionally penetrating the continent, or skirting the coastline as far north as New England. Hurricanes are sea monsters and diminish in intensity as they move inland and away from their source of energy. Although capable of great destruction, hurricanes nevertheless benefit the south- eastern states to a substantial degree. As the eastern states are subject to periodic summer droughts, the vast amounts of water delivered to this region by these giant tropical storms have served more than once to alleviate or terminate the disastrous effects of drought conditions. However, hurricanes are killer storms, and their long- range benefits are obscured by the more obvious death. destruction, and damage accompanying them. On the average, the Atlantic Ocean generates six hurricanes a -----Figure 5.22. Average Number of Days with Thunderstorms Number of Days 80 and above 60-80 40-60 20-4-0 below20 Source: Glenn T. Trewartha, Arthur H. Robinson, and Edwin H. Hammond, eds., Elements of Geography, 5th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1967). year, but as many as eleven in one year have been observed. North Carolina has experienced twelve espe- cially disastrous hurricanes since 1900. Cape Hatteras, extending as it does into the ocean, is affected by hurricanes more than any other area of North Carolina· (Figure 5.23). Its low-lying sandy surface is especially vulnerable to the combined effects of high winds. high tides, and flooding associated with these storms. -• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I __ .---::·::.~:.:~ .'::;;::~ "'f'"" ,J "-'-'I>"• /,:;,,: .ff , -~ 1\ ! ~ ;~it~(.,, ~ \ ;;t ,. l .,·-• · ;,:, i -:_0 ~I;~· 'DJ \; ·:.,. if, ~<~:~::::. ·::;.-;: .... / North Carolina Department of Human Resources Division of Health Services P.O. Box 2091 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2091 ,· I Ref. SO James G. Martin, Governor Bhillipc,lxKirk~ry Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H. David T. Flaherty Secretary MEMORANDUM TO: From: April 15, 1987 Pat DeRosa Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch CERCLA Unit Ted Taylor, Ph.D., Toxicologist< Environmental Epidemiology Branc~ State Health Director SUBJECT: Koppers Company -Off-site Groundwater Investigation I have reviewed the DHS laboratory results taken from 13 wells surrounding the Koppers Company at the Morristown site. Two chemicals used in the Koppers wood-treating process, isopropyl ether (IPE) and pentachlorophenol (PCP),were found at variable, but very low, concentrations in a number of the wells. Five samples were co~pletely negative; the Crowe, John Medlin, Roy Medlin, Louis Barbee residences and the Deli Box. IPE was found in the wells of Wilkinson Construction (trace), William Barbee (1.4 ug/1), L. A. Lyons (16 ug/1), and the Shiloh Baptist Church (28 ug/1); the minimum detection limit reported by EPA is 10 ug/1. The minimum detection limit for PCP by the EPA derivatization method is reported to be 0.5 ug/1; however, the DHS laboratory used a larger sample volume and was able to detect even lower concentrations. The highest level of PCP detected was 0.02 ug/1 at the Shiloh Baptist Church. Trace levels of PCP Oess than 0.02 ug/1) were also found at the residences of Baker, Harding, William Barbee, and at TMI, Wilkinson Construction and Watson Burroughs. Thus, the water at the Shiloh Baptist Church represents the "worst case" for the purpose of evaluation of any health risks associated with drinking water that is contaminated with IPE and/or PCP. In the case of IPE, no relevant toxicological data are available on this chemical as such; however, based on its structural similarity to diethyl ether and to other ethers, the predicted toxicity of IPE would be expected to be very I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I DeRosa Memorandum Page 2 April 15, 1987 low. Tl1us, based on the present information, our best judgment suggests that the concentrations of IPE found in the four wells do not represent a significant health risk to people who consume this water. · In the case of PCP, many relevant studies have been published which indicate that the levels found in the 7 wells do not represent a significant health risk. However, a very recent unpublished toxicity study suggests that PCP may cause cancer in laboratory mice; PCP did not cause cancer in rats. Thus, if the mouse study is found to be valid, some caution would be warranted when PCP is detected in drinking water at elevated concentrations, i.e. in the parts per billion range. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Although PCP apparently produced tumors in mice, the dose given to the animals was hundreds of thousands times higher than the dose that would be received from drinking well water in this area. Thus, at this time, based on the available information, the water from the wells surrounding the Koppers site does not represent a significant health risk; normal usage of water for drinking, cooking, bathing, may continue. 2. Since IPE and PCP were admittedlcy used in the Koppers process and since off-site contamination has been demonstrated, further monitoring of private wells should take place (probably at least at six-month intervals for the near future). This will assure that citizens are not exposed to unacceptable levels of chemicals should the levels be found to be increasing in the future. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 3410. TT:lp c: Bill Meyer, Head, Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch Perry Nelson, Chief, Groundwater Section Wally Venrick, Head, Public Water Supply Branch Greg Smith, M.D., M.P.H., Environmental Epidemiology Branch I I I I I I I I I .1 I I I I I I I I I STONE EN\'IRONMENT AL RESot:acrs. ISC. 436 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1940, Pittsburgh. PA 15219 Dear Ms. DeRosa: March 5, 1987 N.C. Department of Human Resources Division of Health Services P. 0. Box 2091 Raleigh, N.C. 27602 ATTN: Pat DeRosa Waste Management Specialist Ref. 51 Keystone Environmental Resources has been contracted by Koppers to conduct the environmental affairs associated with its former Morrisville, N.C. Facility. In conjunction with the sale of this property to Unit Structures Inc., an environmental base-1 ine study was conducted. This included a survey of the off-site groundwater used for human consumption, The off-site survey consisted of three rounds of samples, taken from n!ne pr!~!te ~!ter ~ells. The first round was sampled on October 24, 1936, and was analyzed by the Keystone Environmental Resources Laboratory in Monroeville, Pa. The analysis included both conventional· water quality parameters, and volatile organics, The latter was done .using gas chromatography (GC). A second round of samples were taken on November 20, 1986. Duplicate samples were analyzed by the Monroeville Lab and by Spectrix Laboratory in Houston, Texas. The Houston laboratory utilized GC/MS {gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry) for organic analysis. The Monroeville Lab used a modified procedure in the extraction step prior to GC analysis, using four liters of sample instead of the normal one liter. A Koppers' method of analysis for pentachlorophenol was also run in addition to the standard GC method. The third round of sampling was conducted on January 14, 1987. The samples were split between the Monroeville and Houston Laboratories, and analyzed like the samples from round two. That is, 4L of sample were extracted for organic analysii instead of the normal 1 L. Both gis chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS) are accepted methods of organic analysis which can detect contamination at the ug/1 level (parts per billion). Of the two methods, GC normally can detect organic compounds at lower concentration levels, but does not positively identify the compound. GC/MS provides a more positive identification of the compound but at a slightly higher level of detection. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 This difference in lower detection levels, and the actual concentrations found, present some problems in the discussion of contamination levels. It appears inappropriate to state a definite concentration of a compound when the contamination levels are so low. Consequently we will present the ranges of contamination levels, noting that in each case, at least one round of sampling exhibited no detectable contamination. Based on the attached analytic data and interpretation, we feel that two of the off-site wells tested produce water with trace levels of industrial chemicals. These are Wells 05-8 (The Shiloh Baptist Church) and Well 05-9 (William Barber Well). The range of constituent levels are: Well 0S-8 (Shiloh Baptist Church) Pentachlorophenol I sopropyl ether Hell DS-9 (William Barber) Isopropylether 8.8 to 28.8 ppb (Avg. Detected 19.4 ppb) 26 to 85.5 ppb (Avg. Detected 57.5 ppb) 13.3 to 17.5 ppb (Avg. Detected 15.4 ppb) Please note that the average values do not include several ''Not Detected" analytical results. The constituents were found at low levels and not consistently detected in repeat sampling. The levels measured of these chemicals are not associated with adverse health effects. The highest concentrations found, 28 ppb pentachlorophenol, and 85 ppb isopropylether, are not considered dangerous to the health of individuals using ·the water on a daily basis for routine activities, i.e., drinking, cooking, bathing, and laundry. Regulatory standards have not been promulgated for either chemical in drinking water; however, the U.S. EPA has issued a lifetime health advisory guideline of 220 ppb for pentachlorophenol in drinking water. The most stringent guideline established for pentachlorophenol in drinking water is that of the State of California which has set a level of 3D ppb on the basis of the taste and odor imparted by the contaminant on the water. ~ I I I I I I I I I ,.I I I I I I I I I We have included the for your inspection. of custody documents Page 3 analytical results These include the are available upon from all the QA/QC data. request. sampling rounds The sample chain We are looking forward to discussing this information with you next week. Please call if you have anyquestions concerning this data. Sincerely yours, Martin M. Schlesinger, Assistant Program Manager Previously Operated Properties &hll3M~ J. H. Butala,·o.A.B.T. Manager, Toxicology and Product Registration, Koppers Company, Inc. •· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 4 ANALYTICAL INTERPRETATION Wells 05-1 to 05-4 Round #1 - 1:c'-l'{l Route #2 - Well 05-5 These samples were filtered in a room which contained sawdust contaminated with Pentachlorophenol. Because PCP was not found in the other samples these are to be disregarded. , f r..-. 1\.(;...e. f ~ l ~-~J\ The~nti\)contamination found in Wells O,S-1 to GS-~ 05-A' "'.'ere below !he~ concentrations in both the field and trip blanks and are therefore to be di s(oun"ted. · ------ The only constituent identified was PCP in round #3 by the Monroeville Lab at 0.6 ppb, using GC. However, the Houston Laboratory did not find the compound at a higher detection limit. Because this trace level 0as found only once, this figure should be discounted. \•Jell 05-6 Unfortunately, the third sam~le round was destroyed in shipment. However, only a trace level of !PE was found by one lab during round #2. Based on the low level of !PE (1.46 ppb) and the lack of .confirmation, this figure should be discounted. Hell 05-7 A trace level (8.6 ppb) of PCP was found via GC by the Monroeville Laboratory during the third round. However, the same laboratory did not find PCP using the more sensitive Koppers' method, nor was PCP found by the Houston Lab using GC/M5. Based on the level of contamination and the lack of confirmation in other rounds, this figure should be discounted. Hell 05-8 Pentachlorophenol was found at trace levels (8.82-28.8), and confirmed by GC/M5 in two rounds of sampling. Additionally, !PE was found at 26_-85.5 ppb levels. Three pheno·lic compounds were identified in only one of the samples, but their presence was not confirmed. STONE o-.!\it._ T _.,L RE.SOl!RCL\, 1-.c. . . I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 5 Well 0S-9 Isopropylether was found in two samples, but not confirmed by the GC/MS. Concentrations were 13.3 and 17.5 ppb. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TO: FROM: RE: File Pat DeRosa D-1' r Y Koppers Co. Inc. NCD003200383 May 8, 1987 I spoke by telephone with Marty Schlesinger, Keystone Environmental Resources, (412) 227-2690, regarding permit and regulatory history at the subject site. According to his records the only environmental permit held by this facility is an Air Permit (#1320R4) issued by the State of NC under the Clean Air Act. This permit was renewed in 1984. No permits are known to have been held under RCRA or NPDES. PD/pw/0384b Ref. 52 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION oEPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT NCTATEl &' 5QQ~UM1DRO 383 PART 1 • SITE LOCATION AND INSPECTION INFORMATION II. SITE NAME AND LDCA TION 01 SITE NAME IL&a1I. cOfflmOll. o,desc,t,11ve nMN1 of stteJ 02 STREET. ROUTE NO., OR SPECIFIC LOCATION 10!:;NTIFIEA Koppers Co. Inc. Hwy. 54 West OJ CITY 04 STATE I 05 ZIP CODE I 06COUNTY l0'~·r•g&r Morrisville NC 27560 Wake 09 COORDINATES lw..a 110 TYPE OF OWNERSHIP (Ctt•e~ 0111J LATITUDE LONGITUDE G(A. PRIVATE O 8. FEDERAL DC. STATE OD. COUNTY OE. MUNICIPAL .35. SQ..49-SD 19 0 F. OTHER 0 G.UNKNOWN Ill. INSPECTION INFORMATION 01 DATE OF INSPECTION 02S1TESTATUS 03 YEARS OF OPERATION 12/17/82&1(_7/87 XJ ACTIVE "-' 1959 I current _UNKNOWN MONTH. OAY YEAR 0 INACTIVE BEGINNING YEAR ENDING YEAR 04 AGENCY PERFORMING INSPECTION /Cit.ck -'lfll1r -,oly/ 0 A.EPA 0 8. EPA CONTRACTOR· 0 C. MUNICIPAL □ D. MUNICIPAL CONTRACTOR ~ E. STATE (N_,,e ot firm/ (N-Offlnn} 0 F. ST ATE CONTRACTOR □ G.OTHER /N.,,..olli¥m) tSll•th! 05 CHIEF INSPECTOR 06 TITLE 07 ORGANIZATION 06 TELEPHONE NO. n~.--·~ 1"."1-_ _,_ ---,...--..... .;,:, l.; -.J 1<>1 J 733-2>tn7 09 OTHER INSPECTORS 10 TITLE 1 1 ORGANIZATION 12 TELEPHONE NO. Mark Durway Geologist NCDHR 191';\ 733-280; ( I - ( I ( I ( I 13 SITE REPRESENTATIVES INTERVIEWEO 14 TITLE 15AODRESS 16 TELEPHONE NO Marty Schlesinger Asst. Proj. M KER, Pittsburgh, PA. (412 227~2690 Jim Campbell Proj. Manager KER, Pittsburgh, PA. 1412j 227-2689 Mike Dvorsky Engineer Koppers, Pittsburgh, PA. 14121 227-2684 ( I ( I ( I 17 ACCESS GAINED BY 18 Tl~E OF INSPECTION 19 WEATHER CONDITIONS (Cll..:ton•J ~Ef:IMISSION 1300 Overcost, approximately 60 F. 0 WARRANT IV. INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM 01 CONTACT 02 OF fAo•.-.e110,g..-u .. 1io,,/ 03 TELEPHONE NO. Marty Schlesinger Keystone Environmental Resources 14121 227-2690 04 PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE INS~ECTION FOAM 05 AGENCY 060IT~ZATl02! 07 TELEPHONE NO. 080ATE Pat DeRosa NC OHR So 1 an Haz. 05 ,08,87 Waste Mng. Br. (919) 733-280 MONTH OAY YEAR EPA FOAM 2070-13 (7•81) I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION &EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE,02StTENUMBER PART 2 • WASTE INFORMATION NC D 003 200 383 I II. WASTE ST ATES, QUANTITIES, ANO CHARACTERISTICS 0 1 PHYSICAL ST A TES /Ch•c• al r,,,,, apoJyJ 02 WASTE QUANTITY AT SITE 03 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS (Cfl•c• ,,,,,,1,wptyJ /Ma.1su,es of "'J•I• quam,1,,.s l¥A. TOXIC 0 A. SOLID lJ E. SLURRY must b" 111cep•nctenr1 !J E. SOLUBLE □ 1. HIGHLY VOLATILE Ll B. POWDER. FINES Q(F. LIQUID TONS U 6. CORROSIVE (J F. INFECTfOUS 0 J. EXPLOSIVE WC. SLUDGE I] G. GAS 0 C. RADIOACTIVE 0 G. FLAMMABLE 0 K. REACTIVE CUBIC YARDS 356.48 CJ D. PERSISTENT 0 H. IGNITABLE 0 L. INCOMPATIBLE U D. OTHER 0 M. NOT APPLICABLE /SpflcllyJ NO.OF DRUMS I I Ill. WASTE TYPE CATEGORY SUBST ANGE NAME 01 GROSS AMOUNT 02 UNIT OF MEASURE OJ COMMENTS SLU SLUDGE OLW OILY WASTE I t'sOL"'I SOLVENTS ·sonronnlether IIPE\ * (Pso") PESTICIDES Jentachlorophenol occ OTHER ORGANIC CHEMICALS I IOC INORGANIC CHEMICALS *IPE lS not a listea ACD ACIDS ". nazarctous SUbS=,Ce BAS BASES I MES HEAVY METALS IV, HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES /See Append/• tor most frequat11lyc,1,.dCAS Numbers/ 01 CATEGORY 02 SUBSTANCE NAME 03 CAS NUMBER 04 STORAGE/DISPOSAL METHOD 05 CONCENTRATION 06 MEASURE OF CONCENTRATION I PSD Pentachlorophenol 87865 Wastewater from TThW SOL Isopropylether 108203 PCP treabnent process was ri. I -anct ctisposeeu in ~llU _\ rqr O ll":'.11 u. H: ' LI,=, , --.-I ;rn,,,,+-=l,1 6 vrs. The once filled vol. of I laqoons ' --· -· 356.48 cu. yds. I I V. FEEDSTOCK$ (SeeApp,.ndl• torCAS Numbers) CATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMBER CATEGORY 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 CAS NUMBER I FDS FDS FDS FDS FDS FDS I FDS FDS VI. SOURCES OF INFORMATION 1c~e specitic ,,,,,,,,,,,en e.o SIBie 1,es. u,noie anatysrs, ,eporu) References 2, 23-25, 30, 47 I I EPA FORM 2070•13 (7•81) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I oEPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE SITE INSPECTION REPORT PART 3. DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS 11. HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS 01 [)[A. GROUNOWATEACONTAMINATION 02 IXOBSEAVEO(DAW ) 978 ) 9861 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: app. 2169 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I. IDENTIFICATION 01 STATEj 02 SITE NUMBER ~C · 1D 003200383 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED Groundwater contamination with , PCP has been measured in on-site wells: May 6 ,-· 197; (4); July 23, 1980 (7); July 24, 1980 (9); Aug. 21, 1980 (5); Sept. 11, 1980 (5,10); Oct. 27, 1980 (5); June 2, 1984 (5); and Sept. 9-11, 1986 (8, 21). 01 ~ 8. SURFACE WATER CONTAMINATION 3 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: -~--- 02.li!OBSEAVED(DATEc l9SQ 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION □ POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED PCP was measured in water from Koppers Pond on Oct. 27, 1980 (5). Pond sediment contamination with PCP was measured April 11, 1980 (11); June 1980 (12); Sept. 11, 1980 (10); and Sept. 24, 1980 (6). Koppers pond overflows to Medlin Pond used for 01 0 C. CONTAMINATION OF AIR 02 0 OBSERVED(DATE: ._, i,,u, ... ,. Al:1.rr1.,.. 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:··-____ _ 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION 01 0 D. FIRE/EXPLOSIVE CONDITIONS 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: _____ ) 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: ____ _ 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION 01 E}E. OIAECTCONTACT pp 638 0200BSERVED(DATEc _____ ) IE: POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED ~ POPULATIQt:,IPOTENTIALLYAFFECTED: a • 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION c;ome soil: rerroval has occured; however, contaminated soil renains on site near the .steel shop, old lagoon area, and in the pone!. There are approxinBtely 638 residents within 1 mile of the site. ~~ !~A~~~;~i:~t~~o:F~;c~~~: app. 10 acre · . . (Aerni 02KJ OBSERVED (DATE: I/ I rlh& -~ 1 ~i)I 04 NA ARA TIVE DESCRIPTION 0 POTENTIAL D ALLEGED On-site soil oontarili.nation with (11); June 1980 (12); Sept. 11, Sept. 26, 1986 (8). PCP was measured: March 19, 1980 (11); .April 3; 1980. 1980 (10); June 1981 (13); July 15, 1986 (14); and 01 f.XG. DRINKING WATER CONTAMINATION 02 IS OBSERVED (DA'rE: _____ ) ® POTENTIAL O ALLEGED 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: app. 2169 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION Isopropylether; which was used on site, has been measured: in off-sitedrinking water wells at approxinBtely 1-28 ppb. IPE, is not a CERCLA tisted hazardous sub- stance, however, it rray indicate direction of contaminant migration. 01 DH. WORKER EXPOSURE/INJURY · 02 D OBSERVED (DATEc _____ ) D POTENTIAL D AU.EGED 03 WORKERS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: ____ _ 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION 01 0 I. POPULATION EXPOSURE/INJURY 03 POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: ____ _ 02 0 OBSERVED (DATEc _____ ) 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION D POTENTIAl. D AU.EGED EPA FORM 2070·13 (7•61) r: I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION oEPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 'hltATElfr 5/ffi~"lB'o'383 PART 3 • DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS I II. HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS (Conwwed/ 01 0 J. DAMAGE TO FLORA 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: I 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I 01 0 K. DAMAGE TO FAUNA 02 □ OBSERVED (DATE: I 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED I 04 NAAAA TIVE DESCRIPTION tlnclvee namers! ot suecies! I 01 0 L. CONTAMINATION OF FOOD CHAIN 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: I ll POTENTIAL · 0 ALLEGED I 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I 01 0 M. UNSTABLE CONTAINMENT OF WASTES 02 □ OBSERVED {DATE: l 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED (Sp1"s!R1mol/!S1andmo hqv,ds, Lna~inQ o,umsl I 03 POPUL.A TION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: 04 NAARA TIVE DESCRIPTION I 01 0 N. DAM.AGE TO OFFSlTE PROPERTY 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: l 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I 01 0 0. CONTAMINATION OF SEWERS. STORM DRAINS. WlNTPs 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: l 0 POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 04 NARRATIVE DESCAJP,TION I I 01 0 P. ILLEGAUUNAUTHOAIZED DUMPING 02 0 OBSERVED (DATE: l [J POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION I 05 DESCRIPTION OF ANY OTHER KNOWN, POTENTIAL, OR ALLEGED HAZARDS I Ill. TOTAL POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: I IV. COMMENTS I V. SOURCES OF INFORMATION {C,t,-so,.c,11<: ,,.1e1encu,., 0 • s1.r111 '""'· ump1,..,,...1~s,s, '"f'O'ISI I References 2, 4-14, 26-34, 40, 43. Laboratory results: Off-site groundwater samples jcollected 12-17-86, 3-20-87. NC S:tate Laboratory of Public Health, Raleigh, NC • )Appendix B: Site investigation report: Koppers Co. Inc. May 1987. Pat DeRosa, NC,..,,.,,.., ; .Uflit ~le I NC, -·--·--· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION oEPA SITE INSPECTION N~TATE 1:02 SITE NUMBER D 003200383 PART 4 • PERMIT AND DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION II. PERMIT INFORMATION 01 TYPE OF PERMIT ISSUED 02 PERMIT NUMBER (Ch.c• d u,ar atJi,iy/ 03 DA TE ISSUED 04 EXPIAA TION DATE OS COMMENTS DA. NP0ES OB. UIC i!!C. AIR 1320 R4 1984 -NC NRCD ~o. RCRA NC-D 00320038. ID# onlv no =nnit. OE. RCAA INTERIM STATUS . OF. SPCC PLAN OG. ST A TE /Spec,tyl . OH. LOCAL /Soec,iri or. OTHER,sp.,;lfy/ bJ. NONE Ill. SITE DESCRIPTION 01 STORAGEIOISPOSAL /Cfl•c• ,11,r,,r apply/ 02 AMOUNT 03 UNIT OF MEASURE 04 TREATMEN! (Check_, 1111111Pp/y/ OS OTHER ~A. SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT aEJ2. 356.48 cu. ~ds. 0 A. INCENERA TION 0 B. PILES . ~ A. BUILDINGS ON SITE 0 B. UNDERGROUND INJECTION 0 C. DRUMS, ABOVE GROUND □ C. CHEMICAUPHYSICAL 0 0. TANK, ABOVEGROUND 0 D. BIOLOGICAL 0 E. TANK, BELOW GROUND 0 E. WASTE OIL PROCESSING 06 AREA OF SITE . 0 F. LANDFILL 0 F. SOLVENT RECOVERY IZG. LANDFAAM □ G. OTHER RECYCLING/RECOVERY ~? fAe,.•J 0 H. OPEN DUMP 0 H.OTHER 0 I.OTHER (Sp&<;JtyJ (Sp•e•ly} 07 COMMENTS . IV. CONTAINMENT 01 CONTAINMENT OF WASTES /Cll•e~on•! 0 A. ADEQUATE, SECURE 0 8. MODERATE 0 C. INAOEOUATE, POOR ~ D. INSECURE, ~NSOUND, DANGEROUS 02 DESCRIPTION OF DRUMS, DIKING. LINERS, BARRIERS, ETC. Surface impoundments or lagoons were unlined with no diking, diversion system, or leachate collection system. Liquid from lagoons was sprayed on field and sludge was mixed into soil. V. ACCESSIBILITY 01 WASTE EASILY ACCESSIBLE: IXYES 0 NO · 02 COMMENTS Site is unfenced, contaminated soil and pond ·are accessible. VI. SOURCES OF INFORMATION (C/fe SIH,C,f1C1.t•1•ncu, •.i,. sl•telilu, •.mr,l••n.iysls, ,.p0t1_sJ References 2,23,40,47,52. EPA FOAM 2070-13 {7-81) I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION oEPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATEl82 SITE NUMBER NC 003200383 PART 5 • WATER, DEMOG.RAPHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA II. DRINKING WATER SUPPLY I I 01 TYPE OF DRINKING SUPPLY 02 STATUS 03 DISTANCE TO SITE {CllednltJplk;.at,/tt/ SURFACE WELL ENDANGERED AFFECTED MONITORED Upstream COMMUNITY A.IX 8.0 A.0 8.0 C.~ A. > 3 fmi) I NON-COMMUNITY c.o D.l<) D. Ill E.0 F.0 8. l 9 (mi) Ill. GROUNDWATER 0 1 GROUNDWATER USE 1N VICINITY (Ch,.eko,,e/ I m. ONLY SOURCE FOR DRINKING 0 8. DRINKING DC. COMMERCIAL, INOUSTRIAL, JRRIGATION 0 D. NOT USED, UNUSEABLE (Othe, source3 •"""bl•) {Umlt!JdO!l>er 5CM/tCH n.i/a°") COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, IRRIGATION /No other w•ter 1ources •-n,llabltt} I 2169 .19 02 POPULATION SERVED BY GROUND WATER 03 DISTANCE TO NEAREST DRINKING WATER WEU. (mi) 04 DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 05 DIRECTION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW 06 DEPTH TO AQUIFER 07 POTENTIAL YIELD 08 SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER OF CONCERN OF AQUIFER 3.85 (ft) unknown. 3.85 'ft) unknown 0 YES JC] NO •(gpd). 09 DESCRIPTION OF WELLS /lrir:ludlnQ uHage, 4'eptlr, an<11or:•t.lolt relit/Ive to r,oi:wtation an,:1 """'fj'I used for process water and toilets on-On-site wells Wl and W2 (189' and 73 are I I site. Drinking water wells in the area average approximately 150' deep and are generally cased down to 20-30 ft. with·the remainder open-hole. I 1 0 RECHARGE AREA 11 DISCHARGE AREA [XYES COMMENTS 0 YES COMMENTS 0 NO On-site pond. 0 NO I IV.SURFACE WATER 01 SURFACE WATER USE fCl>ec~o,u,/ 0 A. RESERVOIR, RECREATION (xB. IRRIGATION, ECONOMICALLY □ C. COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL 0 D. NOT CURRENTLY USED DRINKING WATER SOURCE IMPORTANT RESOURCES I 02 AFFECTED/POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BODIES OF WATER NAME: AFFECTED DISTANCE TO SITE I Ko~;r;:s Pond Ef 0 (mi) •• 77 ;n n~-..:J 0 .19 (mi) Crabtree Cr ' 0 ,] ,94 (mi) I V. DEMOGRAPHIC AND PROPERTY INFORMATION 01 TOT Al POPULATION WITHIN 02 DISTANCE TO NEAREST POPULATION app. 200 ft. ONE ( 1) MILE OF SITE TWO (2lffii OF SITE THREE 1:11f]!-g5 OF SITE A. 638 · .037 1mi) 8. C. NO, OF PERSONS NO. OF ~ERSONS NO, OF PERSONS 03 NUMBER OF BUILDINGS W1THIN TWO (21 MILES OF SITE 04 DISTANCE TO NEAREST OFF·SITE BUILDING 514 .114 app. 600 ft. (mi) I I 0 Th°I~LAt§N ~THm~g;r OF f~~1°cfen'tia'.Icrlpc'oflffiw-ftt1'ioQ'ffi:gf~~thdf·· 'Mb'fri.'1~1'!'T~ ur~e:} There are a few service-oriented businesses and industrial sites which manufacture and distribute I building.11aterials. Population density is low. Wells have a generaly low yield and soils are unfavorable·for the operation of septic systems. I EPA FORM 2070·13 (7•81) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION oEPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT Nt •r•1~ 88b~"!8'o':3 83 PART 5 • WATER, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA VI. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION 0 1 PERMEABILITY OF UNSATURATED ZONE /Cit.ck one/ D A. 1 o-6 -10-a cm/sec Kl B. 1 Q-4 -10-e cm/sec □ C. 1Q-4 -,o-3 cm/sec 0 D. GREATER THAN 10-3 cm/sec 02 PERMEABILITY OF BEDROCK (Cheek o,,e} 0 A. IMPERMEABLE 0 a. RELATIVELY IMPERMEABLE El C. RELATIVELY PERMEABLE 0 0. VERY PERMEABLE (Lenihan 10-6cm1s..:J · 110-4 -,o-6c,,..,uc) po-2 -,o-" cm1,ee1 (GrHt•rtti.n 10-2c,w1..::J 03 DEPTH TO BEDROCK Q,4 DEPTH OF CONT AMINA TED SOIL ZONE OS SOIL pH 20-30 7 UNK 'tt) (It) 06 NET PRECIPIT A TlON . 07 ONE YEAR 24 HOUR RAINFALL OB SLOPE < (in) 3 (in) SITE SLOPE I DIRECTION OF SITE SLOPE I TERRAIN AVERAGE SLOPE 0.4 ,. SE l Q " 09 FLOOD POTENTIAL 10 D SITE rs ON BARRIER ISLAND, COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA, RIVERINE FLOOOWAY SITE ISIN -YEAR FLOODPLAIN 11 OISTANCETOWETLANDS/S•"•"""mumJ 12 DISTANCE TO CRITICAL HABITAT /olMd""Q.,ed&p.cie•J ESTUARINE OTHER > 1 (mil A. > 2 (mi) B. ~ 1 (mi) ENDANGERED SPECIES: NA 13 LAND USE IN VICINITY. DISTANCE TO: RESIDENTIAL AREAS; NA TJONAUST ATE PARKS, AGRICULTURAL LANDS COMMEACIAUINOUSTRIAL FORESTS, OR WILDLIFE RESERVES PRIME AG LANO AG LANO app . 600 ft. A. . 114 (mi) . B. .19 (ml) C. NA (ml) 0 . .25 (ml) 14 DESCRIPTION OF SITE IN AELA!10N TO SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY Relief at the site ranges from 385-365 ft. above mean sea level (20) . A railroad spur runs southwest across· the site. The area southeast of the spur, including the old Cellon treatment and lagoon area, drain to Koppers Pond. North and west of this spur, the site drains to a ditch which flows east under the railroad tracks toward Hwy. 54. Facility slope between the lagoon areai!/'115) and the north shore of Koppers Pond (B15) = (368-350) ~ 500 ft.= 0.4%. The terrain average slope between _the north shore of Koppers Pond and Medlin Pond = (368-350)/1000 ft. = 1.8%. VII. SOURCES OF INFORMATION rc,r.,p,clllc,.1.,,ncn. ,.g .. ,111• /U-,. utnp1e1n~•ia. ,.potts/ References l,3,5,8,13,17,20-22,26-38,40,42,43,46,47. EPAF0RM2070 13(7 811 oEPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE I 02 SITE NUMBER "" n nn1?nn1A1 PART 6 ·SAMPLE AND FIELD INFORMATION II. SAMPLES TAKEN 01 NUMBER OF 02 SAMPLES SENT TO 03 ESTIMATED DATE SAMPLE TYPE SAMPLES TAKEN RESULTS AVAJl..ABLE GROUNDWATER off.-.si tE 50 State Lab. of Public Health, NC DHR available SURFACE WATER WASTE AIR RUNOFF SPILL SOIL VEGETATION OTHER Ill. FIELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN 01 TYPE 02 COMMENTS IV. PHOTOGRAPHS AND MAPS 01 TYPE Q{GAOUNO O AERIAL I 02 IN CUSTODY OF NC I "H:k'I .n unn: ~LLe (N1m11 o/ o,r,•rlilat,o,, or rldlvldv.lJ 03 MAPS 04 LOCATION OF MAPS , Xl YES NC CERCLA Unit Files, Raleigh, NC · 0 NO V. OTHER FIELD DATA COLLECTED (Prov1c1,,..,,,.11v,11mr1pr10nJ 12-17-87 6 wells sampled 6 P&T + IPE (2 wells) 6 Total inorganic - 6 Extractables - 6 PCP (to 1 ppb) - 03-20-87 13 wells sampled 13 P&T + IPE (4 wells) 13 PCP (to 1 pj)b) + PCP (7 wells) VI. SOURCES OF INFORMATION /Chu sp1µ;;,1;,;,.,18,..,,c<tS. e.11 .. slate ,,16s, umpi6~n~lys,s, reports/ •Laboratory Results: Off-site groundwater samples collected 12-17-<>o, u.>-'ZU-8/. NC State Laboratory of Public Health, Raleigh, NC. Appendix B, Site Investigation Report: Koppers Co. Inc. May 1987. Pat DeRosa, NC CERCLA Unit, Raleigh, NC. EPAFORM2070•13 7•81 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION oEPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE 102 SITE NUMBER NC D 003200383 PART 7-OWNER INFORMATION II. CURRENT OWNER(S) PARENT COMPANY /llawlic•bleJ I OINAME 02 D+ B NUMBER 08 NAME 09 O+B NUMBER Koppers Co_ . Inc_ Koppers Co. Inc. I 03 STREET AOORESS/P.0. 8o•. RFD•. •re./ r•SICCOOE 10 STREET AOORESSrP.O. Bo•. RFDI, •re,) r 1 ~IC CODE P.O. Box A 436 Seventh Ave. 05CITY ·r6~2TE 07 ZlPCOOE 12CHY 113STATE 14 ZIP CODE -Morrisville 27560 Pittsburgh PA 15219 OINAME 02 O+B NUMBER 06 NAME 09 D+B NUMBER I I Unit Structures, Inc. Unit Structures, Inc. OJ STREET ADORESSrP.O. Bo•. RFD•. ,rc.J 104SICCOOE 10 STREET AOORESS(P.0. Bo•. RFD•. ,1c.J 111SICCODE Hwy. 54 West P.O. Box 23215 05 CITY 106STATE 07 ZIP CODE 12CITY 11~ATE 14ZlPCODE Morrisville NC 27560 Louisville 40223 01NAME 02 O+B NUMBER 08NAME 09 D+B NUMBER I 03 STREET AODRESSrP.0. Bo,. RFOI, •le,/ 104 SIC CODE 10 STREET ADDRESS (P.O.&•." RFOI, •tc.} 111SICCOOE I 05 CITY 106STATE 07 ZIPCODE 12CITY ]13 STA~E 1 ◄ZIPCOOE 01 NAME 02 O+B NUMBER 08 NAME 09D+BNUMBER I 03 STREET AOORESS/P.0. Bo•. RFDII, elc.J 104 SIC CODE 10 STREET AOORESS/P.O. Bo,, RFDII, elc./ r1~CCODE I 05CITY . 106STAT 07 ZIP CODE 12 CITY 113 STATE U ZIP CODE Ill. PREVIOUS OWNER(S) rtisr1n<»r,ecer,trn11, IV. REAL TY OWNEA{S) /If i,,p1,cebie; hi moat ,ece,., fJrrl/ OINAME 02 D+B NUMBER OlNAME 02 o+e NUMBER I Unit Structures-Inc. 03 STREET AODRESS/P.O. fJo•. RFD,, etc./ I o◄ s'.c co.oE 03 STREET AODRESS(P,O. Bo,, RFD,. •re./ . , I?◄ SIC CODE P.O. Box 23215 I 05 CITY 106:TE 07 ZIP CODE 05CITY 106 STATE 07 ZIP CODE T-•,.:--~--:11,.._ ,In??"< 01NAME 02 O+B NUMBER 01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER r,..,..,.. • T. ; "~ I 03 STREET ADOAESSfP.0. Bo•. RFD•. etc.} 10◄ SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. 8o•. RFD II, etc./ 10◄ SIC CODE I 05CITY 1°6STAT~ 07 ZIP CODE 05CITY 106STATE 07 ZIP CODE 01·NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01 NAME 02 o+e NUMBER, I 03 STREET ADOAESS(P.0. &,, RFQ.11, etc.J lo~ s1ccooE 03 STREET ADDRESS tP.0. Bo•. RFD II, erc.J 10◄ SICCOOE 05CITY 106STATE 07 ZIP CODE 05 CITY 1°6STATE 07ZIPCODE I V. SOURCES ·oF INFORMATION (C/lea(JeCIIIC ,ere,ences, e.o st•te /Mu, •.n1P'-e,..,..,1$, reporls/ References 40,2 I . EPA FORM 2070•13 (7•61) I I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION &EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATEI02 SITE NUMBER NC D003200383 PART 8 • OPERATOR INFORMATION I II. CURRENT OPERATOR /Pro>rld• If ditt•rent lrom o ... n..,} OPERATOR'S PARENT COMPANY f/fer,(lNc•bl•I 01 NAME /°2 O+B NUMBER 10NAME r 1 O+B NUMBE~ TTnit Structures I 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O.&•. RFDII, .,c,J 104 SICCOOE 12 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. &u. RFD#, etc.J r3SlCCODE Hwv. 54 west 05CffY ~: STATEI07 ZIP CODE 14CITY r 5 STATE 116 ZIP CODE Morrisville C 27560 I 08 YEARS OF OPERATION I 09 NAME OF OWNER 1986-Unit Structures/Koppers I Ill. PREVIOUS OPERA TOR($) (Lisi mo&!,~..,, first; PfDvld• only /ldllferM/ lrom owner/ PREVIOUS OPERATORS' PARENT COMPANIES r1t11PP1k•bl•J 01NAME I 02 D~B NUMBER 10NAME 111 D+BNUMBER Kon=rs Co. Inc. I 03 STREET ADDRESS /P.O. Ba•. RFOI, ere./ 104 SIC CODE 12 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Bo•. RFDI, etc.} 113 SIC CODE 436 Seventh Ave. OS CITY r•sr,r, 1 o7ZIPCOOE 14CITY r5STATE 1 16ZIPCODE Pittsburgh PA 15219 I OB '(EARS OF OPE~TION I 09 ~AME OF OWNER OU RING THIS PERIOD 1962-1986 Kon=rs Co. Inc. 01NAME I020+BNUMBER 10NAME I" O+B NUMBER Unit Structures, Inc. 03 STREET AODRESS/P.O. &11. RFDI, •le.} 104 SIC CODE 12 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. 8o•, RFOI, •tc,J 1'3 SICCOOE Hwy. 54 West I I 05CITY 1·06STATEI07 ZIP CODE 14CITY r5 STATE 1 , a ZIP CODE Morrisville NC 27560 08 YEARS OF OPERATION I 09 NAME OF OWNER DURING THIS PERIOD 1959-1962 Unit Structures I 01 NAME I 0~ 0+ B NUMBER 10NAME ·111 D+BNUMBEA Cary Lumber Co. I 03 STREET AODAESS{P.O. Bo.c, RFDI, •le.} 104SICCOOE 12 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Bo•, RFOI, ere.} 113 SIC CODE 05 CITY re STATEI07 ZIPCOOE 14CITY -115 ~TATEi 16 ZIP CODE I 08 ~EA.RS OF OPEf'.'ATI~ I 09 NAME OF OWNER DURING THIS PERIOD ?-1959 I IV. SOURCES OF INFORMATION 1c1t• wKiflc ,.,.,..,cu .•. 0., 11e1e rr.,. sample .,..,sis. ,.pO(f~/ References 40,2 I EPA FORM 2070-13 (7•81) I I I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION oEPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATEb2 SITE NUMBER · NC 003200383 PART 9· GENERATOR/TRANSPORTER INFORMATION II. ON•SITE GENERA TOR I 01 NAME 02 O+B NUMBER I OJ STREET ADDRESS (P.O. 8o•. RFDI, •tc./ I 04SICCODE 05 CITY 06 STATE 07 ZIPCOOE I Ill. OFF-SITE GENERATOR(S) 01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01NAME 02 O+B NUMBER I OJ STREET ADDRESS (P.O. 6o•, RFDII, etc.} I 04 SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. &u, RFOI, •tc.J 04 SIC CODE I 05C1TY 06 STATE 07 ZJPCOOE OS CITY 1°6STATE 07 ZIP CODE 01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01NAME 02 D+B NUMBER I I 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. ao., RFD,. •tc,J I 04 SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS /P.O. Ba•, RFD 1, •rc.J 04 SIC CODE 05 CITY 06 ST A TE 07 ZIP CODE OS CITY 1°6 STATE 07 ZIP CODE IV. TRANSPORTER(S) 01 NAME 02 D+B NUMBER 01 NAME 02 O+B NUMBER I 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Bo•, RFD1,,,rc.J I 0,4 SIC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. 6o•. RFDI, e/c.} 04 SIC CODE I 05 CITY 06 STATE 07 ZlPCODE 05 CITY 1°6 STATE 07 ZIP CODE 01NAME 02 0+8 NUMBER 01NAME 02D+BNUMBER I 03 STREET ADDRESS (P.O. Bai. RFD~, •tr;./ I 04 S_IC CODE 03 STREET ADDRESS /P.O. Boi. RFDt1, •1,;,J 04SICCODE I 05CITY 06STATE 07 ZIP CODE 05 CITY 1°6STATE 07 ZIPCOOE . V. SOURCES OF INFORMATION /CW.1PKll1t;r•f•••,,,m. "-II 1f•t• lh1 ... mol• .,,-,y$l1. "'P<lf/lJ I I I I EPA FOAM 2070•13 (7•81) I I . I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION &EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE102 SITE NUMBER PART 10 -PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES r-.Tr' D O:"i-----:i I 11. PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES 01 0 A. WATER SUPPLY CLOSED 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 D B. TEMPORARY WATER SUPPLY PROVIDED 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 C. PERMANENT WATER SUPPLY PROVIDED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION 01 0 0. SPILLED MATERIAL REMOVED 02 DATE 03AGENCY I 04 DESCRIPTION 01 ~ E. CONT AMINA TED SOJL REMOVED 02 DATE 03AGENCY I 04 DESCRIPTION . Aoril and Mav 1980; November 1980; July 1986 01 □ F. WASTE REPACKAGED ' 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 D G. WASTE DISPOSED ELSEWHERE 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 H. ON SITE BURIAL 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 I. IN SITU CHEMICAL TREATMENT 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 J. IN SITU BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 K. IN SITU PHYSICAL TREATMENT 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION 01 0 L. ENCAPSULATION 02 DATE 03AGENCY I 04 DESCRIPTION 01 0 M. EMERGENCY WAf>TE TREATMENT 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION . I 01 0 N. CUTOFF WALLS 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 0. EMERGENCY DIKING/SURFACE WATER DIVERSION 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 P. CUTOFF TRENCHES/SUMP 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 0. SUBSURFACE CUTOFF WALL 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I EPA FORM 2070•13 /7•81 J I I I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION &EPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT . 01 STATE! 02 SITE NUMBER PART 10 • PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES Nr D 003200383 II PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES (conr1n1Je<11 I 01 0 A. BARRIER WALLS CONSTRUCTED 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION ' I 01 0 S. CAPPING/COVERING 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION 01 0 T. BULK TANKAGE REPAIRED ' 02 DATE 03AGENCY I 04 DESCRIPTION ' 01 0 U.GROUTCURTAtNCONSTRUCTED 02 DATE OJ AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 V. BOTTOM SEALED 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 W. GAS CONTROL 02 DATE 03AGENCY . 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 X. FIRE CONTROL 02 DATE OJ AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 Y. LEACHATE TREATMENT 02 DATE OJ AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I 01 0 Z. AREA EVACUATED 02 DATE 03 AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION 01 0 1 . ACCESS TO SITE RESTRICTED 02 DATE 03AGENCY I 04 DESCRIPTION 01 0 2. POPULATION RELOCATE,0 04 DESCAIPTJON 02 DATE 03 AGENCY I ' 01 0 3. OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES 02 DATE 03AGENCY 04 DESCRIPTION I I I Ill. SOURCES OF INFORMATION /Cit• Si.>•cif/c r•t•r•nc•s. • g • 51•!• f~as. J41T1111• 1nalysls. r•parn} References 2,5 I EPA.FORM 2070•13{7 81) I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IDENTIFICATION oEPA SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STATE I 02 SITE NUMBER NC D 003200383 PART 11 • ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION II. ENFORCEMENT INFOAMA TION 01 PAST REGULATORY/ENFORCEMENT ACTION O YES )Ii NO 02 DESCAIPTK)N OF FEDERAL STATE. LOCAL REGULATORY/ENFORCEMENT ACTION ' Ill. SOURCES OF INFORMATION {C,t• spec1to:rel11reru;u, "·!1-, st•t11 f~es. Hmplean.alys,s. ••POrls/ EPA FORM 2070-13{7-81) I I I I I I I I Ii I I I I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SITE SAFETY PLAN A. GENERAL INFORMATION Site Name Koppers Inc. Location Morrisville, NC Purpose of Visit __ ___;PA X ---SI Site Number NC D003200383 Date 12/15/86 Other --- Proposed Date of Inspection 12/17/86 ----'-.C..:....:....:. ________ _ Date of Briefing 12/15/86 --~~-------- Priority Ranking --- Site Investigation Team Personnel Pat DeRosa Mark Durway Low X Medium ---High --- Responsibilities Sampling Sampling B. SITE/WASTE CHARACTERISTICS X Liquid Solid --X Sludge Gas ---Waste Type(s) Characteristics Ignitable Radioactive Corrosive -----;--;v-o· 1a tile --~-_x __ Toxic Reactive __ Other List Known or Suspected Hazards (physical,chemical biological or radioactive) on Site and their toxicological effects. Also, if known, list chemical amotmts HAZARD Pentachlorophenol Isopropylether EFFECT(S) 0.5 mg/m -TLV skin, light brown solid with a pungent odor when hot 250 ppm -TLV colorless liquid with ether odor I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Facility Description: Size 20-25 acres Buildings 6 buildings Disposal Methods Being Investigated land farming of wastes Unusual Features on Site (dike integrity, power lines, terrain etc.): 3 acre pond on site History of the Site: This site has been in use since 1961. Waste materials from pentachlorophenol treatment were land farmed and disposed of in on-site pits from 1968-1975. A cleanup involving removal of 220 tons of contaminated soil was done in 1980. PCP has been identified in pond sediment and wells on site (6.4 mg/kg in pond). C. HAZARD EVALUATION Sampling at this time is to consist of off-site private drinking water wells. This sampling can be done in Level D protection. Polyethylene gloves and goggles should be worn ·while pipetting acid for the water samples. D • WORK PLAN INSfRUCTION · Map or Sketch Attached? in file Perimeter Identified? yes Command Post Identified? no Zones of Contamination Identified? yes Personal Protective Equipment Level of Protection A B C X D --- Modifications goggles and gloves need to be worn when pipetting acid. I I I I I I I I •• I I I I I I I I I I Hospital (Address and·Phone Number) Rex Hos ital Blue Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC Emergency Transportation Systems (Phone Numbers) Fire use 911 Ambulance use 911 Rescue Squad use 911 --------------- Emergency Route to Hospital Take Hwy. 54 to 1-40, take 1-40 towards Durham. Get off on Wade Avenue exit. Get off on Blue Ridge Road exit. Take a left at top of exit ramp, hospital will be on the right in 1-2 miles. PREVAILING WEATHER CONDITIONS AND FORECAST partly cloudy with a high in the u er 50's . EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST Air ,purifying respirator Cartridges for respirator 3M 8710 Respirator X First Aid Kit X 3 gal. Distilled H20 X Personal Protective _:..;,___ 02 Indicator Clothing ---Detector Tube & Pump Eye Wash Unit ---H Nu Boots or Boot Covers ----Coveralls (tyvek) X Eye Protection ----Hard Hat ___ pH Meter Explosimeter ---Radioactive Monitor X Decontamination ASHEVILLE 704-255-4490 CHARLOTTE 704-379-5827 DURHAM 1-800-6 72-1697 GREENSBORO 919-379-4105 1-800-722-2222 Materials. Poison Control Center -State Coordinator Duke University Medical Center Telephone: .l-800-672-1697 Box 3024 Durham, NC 27710 Western NC Poison HENDERSONVILLE Control Center 704-693-6522 Memorial Mission Hosp. Ext. 555, 556 509 Biltmore Ave. 28801 Mercy Hospital HICKORY 2001 Vail Ave, 28207 704-322-6649 Duke Univ Medical Center JACKSONVILLE Box 3007, 27710 919-577-2555 Moses Cone Hospital WILMINGTON 1200 N. Elm St, 27420 919-343-7046 Margaret R. Pardee Memorial Hospital Fleming St., 28739 Catawba Mem. Hosp. Fairgrove Chur. Rd 28601 Onslow Mem. Hospital Western Blvd. 28540 New Hanover Mem. Hospital 2131 S. 17th St, 28401 I I I I I I I I I I I I Surveillance Equipment: H Nu ----Explosimeter ---TLD Detector Tubes and Pumps 02 Meter (Radiation Monitor) Decontamination Procedures Level A Level B --- Level C --- Segregated equipment drop, boot cover and glove wash, boot cover and glove rinse, tape removal, suit and hard hat removal, SCBA backpack removal, inner glove wash, inner glove removal, inner clothing removal, field wash, redress Segregated equipment drop, boot cover and glove wash,boot cover and glove rinse, tape removal. boot cover removal outer glove removal, suit/safety removal, SCBA backpack removal, inner glove wash, inner glove rinse, facepiece removal, inner glove removal, inner clothing removal, field wash, redress. Segregated equipment drop, boot cover and glove wash, boot cover and glove rinse, tape removal, boot cover removal, outer glove removal,suit/safety boot wash, suit/safety boot rinse lCanister or Mask Change), safety boot removal, splash suit removal, inner glove wash, inner glove rinse, facepiece removal, inner glove removal, inner clothing removal. field wash redress. X Level D Segregated equipment drop. boot and glove wash, boot and glove rinse. --- Modifications --------------------------- Work Schedule/ Limitations __ s_am_p~l_1_·n~g~o_f_r_e_s_id_e_n_t_i_a_l_w_e_l_ls ________ _ I EMERGENCY PRECAITTIONS I I I I Acute Exposure Symptoms skin eyes inhalation ingestion First Aid soap and water wash immediately flush immediately fresh air and artificial resp. medical attention I I I '-J I I I i •• l,ttr I I I I I I ''".'.'·. I' "' I EPA CHEMICAL PROFILE·,:·, INTERIM· ,, .... , , --•',. \ ~ :i'' 7 ' I ' -' • -~ .""~--~;.' __ , ~,:: · · · Date: Octob~·r; 31'; 1985 Revision: CHEMICAL IDENTITY. c:-PENTACHLOROPHENOL ·. "'·' ·_}(,·:_: .... .-::;;.,::~~--- CAS Registry Number: 87-86-5 Synonyms: 2, 3, 4 ,5, 6-Pentachlorophenol; Chem-Tel; Chlorophen; Dowii::ide 7; Durotox; EP 30; Fungifen; Grundier Arbezol; Lauxtol; Lauxtol A; Liroprem; NCI-C54933; PCP; Penchlorol; Penta; Penta-Kil; Pentachlorophenate; Pentacon; J Pentasol; Penwar; Peratox; Permacide; Permagard; Permasan; Permatox DP-2; Permite; Santophen; Santophen 20; Sinituho; Term-I-Trol; Thompson's Wood Fix; Weedone; Phenol, Pentachloro- Chemical Formula: c6ttc1 5o Molecular Weight: 266. 35 SECTION I --HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS/IDENTITY INFORMATION OSHA PEL: TWA 500 µg/m' (NIOSH/OSHA 1978, p. 148) ACGIH TLV: TWA 0.5 mg/m'; STEL 1.5 mg/m' (skin) (*ACGIH 1982) -.:•. IDLH: 150 mg/;., (NIOSH/OSHA 1978, p. 148) Other Limits Recommended: Not Found SECTION II --PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS Boiling Point: 588°F, 309°C (*Merck 1976) Specific Gravi~ (H20=l): ;1.978 at 2tC/4°C (*Merck 1976) Vapor Pressure (mmHg): 0.0002 at 20°C (NI0SH/OSHA 1978, p. 148) Melting Point: 374°F, 190°C (*Merck 1976) Vapor Density (AIR=l): 9.20 (*Verschueren 1983) Evaporation Rate (Butyl acetate=l): Not Found Solubility in Water: 0.002 g/100 ml at 30°C (*Spencer 1982) I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I CAS Registry Number: 87-86-5 Page 2 of 4 PENTACHLOROPHENOL SECTION 11 --PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS (Continued) Appearance and Odor: Needle-like crystals (*Merck 1983). Colorless crystals (pure); dark greyish powder o"r flakes (crude product) (''Spencer 1982). Phenolic odor ("'Spencer 1982) and also a very pungent odor when hot (*Merck 1976). SECTION 111 --FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA Flash Point (Method Used): Not Found Flammable Limits: This material may burn but may not ignite readily (*DOT 1984). Under normal conditions it is not flammable c-:,cHil.IS 1978). LEL: Not Found UEL: Not Found Extingu.ishing Methods: Water spray may be used to extinguish fire. Dry chemicals, foam, or carbon dioxide can also be used. Use water to keep fire-exposed containers cool ("'NFPA 1978). Special Fire Fighting Procedures: Full protective clothing: self-contained breathing apparatus, rubber gloves, boots, and bands around legs, arms, and waist. No skin surface should be exposed (*~'FPA 1978). If protective clothing becomes soaked it must be replaced immediately (*Clayton and Clayton 1982). Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards: Liquid must be moderately heated before ignition will occur (*NFPA 1978). SECTION IV --REACTIVITY DATA Stability: Unstable: Stable: Yes (*NFPA 1978) Conditions to Avoid: Prolonged heating above 200°C produces trace amounts of octachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin (*IARC 1972-1985). Incompatibility (Materials to Avoid): Contact with strong oxidizers may cause.fires or explosions (*NIOSH/0SHA 1981). Hazardous Decomposition or Byproducts: it emits highly toxic fumes of chlorides chlorinated phenols, and carbon monoxide decomoosition (*NIOSH/OSHA 1981). . . When heated to decomposition, ('''Sax 1975). Hydrogen chloride, may be released upon .a::: .. , ......... . 1··········· ,;_;-;;;,;-;;-:- ·.·::·:·:·-·.· I I I I CAS Registry Number: 87-86-5 Page 3 of 4 PENTACHLOROPHENOL SECTION IV --REACTIVITY DATA (Continued) Hazardous Polymerization: May Occur: Not Found May Not Occur: Not Found Conditions to Avoid: Not Found I SECTION V --HEAL TH HAZARD DATA I I I I I I I I I ::,1· .. Routes of Entry: Inhalation: Skin: Yes Ingestion: Yes (*Clayton and Clayton 1982) (*Clayton and Clayton 1982) Yes (*Clayton and Clayton 19.82) Health Hazards· (Acute, Delayed, and Chronic): Poisonous if swallowed or inhaled (*DOT 1984). Very toxic: probable oral lethal dose (human) 50-500 mg/kg (1 teaspoon to l ounce) for 70 kg person (150 lbs.) ("'Gosselin 1976). Lethal oral doses in humans have been reported at 29 mg/kg (*NI0SH 1985). Causes lung, liver, and kidney damage, and contact dermatitis (*Herek 1976). Inhalation results in acute poisoning centering in circulatory system with accompanying heart failure. Also, visual damage, scotoma, inflammation of conjuctiva, cornea opacity, co~nea numbness and slight pupil dilation are experienced C''ACGIH 1980). Repeated exposure to commer.cial material preceded aplastic anemia, pure red cell aplasia, Hodgkins disease and acute leukemia (*Roberts 1983). Signs and Symptoms of Exposure: Ingestion causes increased then decreased respiration, blood pressure, and urinary output; fever; increased bowel action; motor weakness; collapse with convulsions; and death (*Herek 1976). Inhalation of dust and mist cause violent sneezing and coughing (*USEPA, AWQC 1980). Liquid or solid dermal contact causes smarting of skin and first-degree burns on short exposure; may cause secondary burns on long exposure (*CHRIS 1978). Medical Conditions Generally Aggravated by Exposure: Kidney and liver diseases (*Cfayton and Clayton .1982") . . Emergency and First Aid Procedures: Hove victim to fresh air. Remove and isolate contaminated clothing and shoes at the site. In case of contact with material; immediately flush skin or eyes with running water for at least 15 minutes (*DOT 1984). Bathe and shampoo contaminated skin and hair promptly with soap and water. Flush eyes ,dth copious amount of clean water. Systemic poisoning: reduce elevated body temperature by physical means. (Do not administer aspirin.) Adrninis ter sponge baths and cover with low-temperature blankets (*~organ 1982). I I I I I I I I •· I I I I I I I I CAS Registry Number: 87-86-5 Page 4 of 4 PENTACHLOROP.HENOL SECTION VI --USE INFORMATION Wood preservative; soil fumigant for termites, herbicide, fungicide, · slimicide, algicide, antibacterial agent in disinfectants and cleaners ('~SRI) . SECTION VI I --PRECAUTIONS FOR SAFE HANDLING AND USE (Steps to be Taken in Case Material is Released or Spilled) Avoid inhalation. Wear proper respiratory protection and protective clothing (see Section V above). Avoid contact with solid and dust. Keep unnecessary people away (*CHRIS 1978) .. · Ventilate area of spilL Collect spilled material in most convenient and safe manner and deposit in sealed containers for reclamation or disposal in secure sani1:ary landfill. Liquid should be absorbed in vermiculite, dry sand, earth, or similar material (*NIOSH/OSHA 1981). I I I :is oxides of •· pin.sties ' '1iou]d stay l ,te ill'C.'.l. 1 1 cvapo- Sttch as a •1cd in a I l \:PD . . I I I ' I ·1 .I I I i ! 1·0.nmon name: Isopropyl ether ,·,,nnula: ((Cl-l"),Cl·I),O ISOPROPYL ETHER / 505 Synonyms: Diisopropyl ether; 2-isopropoxypropanc CAS No.: 108-20-3 Carcinogen: N / A II.REGULATORY INFORMATION !lawrdous substance: No Haznrrlous waste: No DOT Hazard Class: Flammable liquid 111. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Boiling point: G8.9 C (156 F) Specific gravity: 0.7 Vapor density: At boiling point, 3.5 Melting point: -85 C (-121 F) Vapor pressure: At 20 C, 119 mm Hg Solubility in water: At 20 C, 0.2 g/l00g water Evaporation rate: 8 Appearance and odor: Colorless liquid with a sharp, sweet, ether-• like odor · · IV. PHYSICAL HAZARDS Flash point: -27.8 C (-18 F) Autoignition temperature: 443 C (830 F) Flammable limits in air(% by vol.): Lower: 1.4; Upper: 7.9 Extinguishants: Dry chemical, alcohol foam, or carbon dioxide V. HEAL TH HAZARDS Stong vapor concentrations can cause irritation of the· eyes and nose. Animal experiments have . indicated the possibility of drowsiness, dizziness, and unconsciousness. Long-term exposure may cause dryness and irritation of the skin. VI. EMERGENCY FIRST AID Eyes: Wash with large amounts of water, lifting the lids occasional- ly. Get medical attention as soon as possible. Do not wear contacts when working with the substance. Skin: Wash with soap or mild detergent. Remove contaminated clothing. If there is skin irritation, get medical attention. Breathing: M.ove patient to fresh air. Perform artificial respiration if needed. Keep patient warm and at rest. Get medical attention as soon as possible. . ·-·--~ -·---· •' ·•:1•,:,.., ' ' I \ !, "• I •t •. 1:4•~ :~•,tv.t~1.·: f,:<'cf.::,~~ ... i: .... ·.-'!' ••. . 506 / CHEMICAL SAFETY DA TA Swallowing: Get medical attention immediately. Give large ~uard:• ties of water, and then induce vomiting. VII. PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE LIMIT OSHA TWA: 500 ppm ACGIH TLV: 250 ppm ACGIH: 310 ppm IDLH: 10,000 ppm I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. TO:· FROM: RE: 3U December 1~86 File Mary Giguere l\R<': Koppers Inc, NC D003200383 Site Safety Plan On January 7, 1987 Pat DeRosa and Mark Durway are planning to tour the Koppers Inc. Morrisville site. Samples are not going to be taken during the visit. Level D protection will be adequate for the visit. Rubber boots are to be worn when touring the site. MG/tb/024lb I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I l 2 February 1987 TO: File FROM: Mary Giguere f'<'V RE: Koppers Inc. Morrisville site NC D003200383 All samples collected during a site investigation will be preserved by storing them on ice. Water samples for metal and volatile organics analyses should also be preserved with acid unless they contain visible sediment. The metals samples should be preserved with nitric acid to a pH of less than 2 but greater than 1. To do this start by adding 3 ml. of nitric acid to the sampling container. After collecting the sample, check the pH, if more acid is needed add it and note how much was added. Put a check mark on the cap of the metal samples that have been preserved. If more than 3 mls. of acid have been added indicate the total amount of acid added on the sample container cap. For the VOA samples 4 drops of HCl should be added before the sample is collected. Collect the sample as usual. Goggles and gloves will be worn while measuring acids and collecting samples. Pasteur pipets will be used for measuring the hydrochloric acid. Graduated pipets will be used for nitric acid. Pipets will be rinsed and then disposed of. Samples are to be taken for phenol analysis. These samples shall be collected in a 1-liter amber glass container with a Teflon lined closure. Sulfuric acid will be added to adjust the pH to less than two. !,1;/tb/0354b 3/87 -0 0 0 _II --•• f-w w LL z - w ....J <( u en " .,, ., "' > ~~~tlfl , ~,. __ .. --~-g:f'\ --~~ -~J if¥~11/ ~\~, ... -. '-'::-'.;:"'. I /;;/" / / lco-_CC" < ~ \ ~--:-'--- ;;;::_-, c ///? ~c-c, , ' / <:$;/(.{/ / d~= ---;; !! Y;~~~ -~~~--~~ 'll!f/ «'(I . ' ,,:~-•,y~ ~ / -~--,-/ rs i - " /::/ Ill --.-, ,--_,,I - ~ -___-/~ . ___./-.. ~ '·,, _,'\._,--i j -.;:f --,:yi/;, : -~ 0 c_--..., I \ ' • ----c; / • / - '--. • " '' ~ ' I ,r-~ ~ / ( ...-'\ ,_ \ \1 \I -' ! I • ~~=~--""-~--~ -~ --,,.. - ~""~ --"" ~ z__ ,-,<" p -~ ~ --- 7' 1 j I , "" -- Si-='-~"-----,."'-~--~~ ,,_ I t ·-;, j "'\ f ' - -.V / -' ( ) - ' • ' ' -,--<'.,__ ! / I ;, I _,_ \ // L • • iii5ojij I . - .__ ' . ! I -' • I G> ~ fTI z I io ; ;lJ I< I rn I \~ I \ I ,..-----:::i/ \ - I ~i \~ I - __ ,..-~ --_ ___. -i,-+--_ __....... ::--.-~ . ~?.l!!.H,~-~~--.--.. ---~~i!:-.R.QA~~~=~=-~----- / / ··--....,.....~--. . - / / ___..... ;< •• '......... ---------.. / .. •···· ~ ... ..-<-4 -----·-/ .-....... -- , /",.. / . .\' ..... , .. / ,, .... · ~ ,,.,. ",..,,.... \ ...;__ ____ PROPOSltD --EXISTIN!i WATER WATER MAIN MAIN ff', "{'i ~ ~- ~/\ .1~\ ".\ "'\· . N C HWY. ~4 · ~. \ n . . -. \ ~-1-6-.. -.----··-----..;. . --------~--=-. ----_::----·· ·~ "\ \ -----=::::: -----4-a e ....,...,.. ..... i---·-.,.._, -f-...... ·""· \ _.,.,-;::;;:;;:?·:·::>-., ' -··:-..--:-,----- -RE ~~ \\ \' \ \ .c: ' " I c:: • 0 ~ co I C: 0- "' C I ,,.-• -_,,_.-1-~~... - ...,.-1--\· . I \ •,,·.' . i '