NCD003188844_19980701_Carolina Transformer_FRBCERCLA RD_Remedial Design - Rev. 1 Solicitation Package Project Assurance-OCR

• •
Document Control No. 4400-73-AHPM
Revision 1
WORK PLAN
REMEDIAL DESIGN/SOLICITATION PACKAGE
PROJECT ASSISTANCE
CAROLINA TRANSFORMER SITE
FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Wqrk Assignment No. 73-4NC2
JULY 1998
REGION IV
U.S. EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-W9-0057
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, Georgia 30092
WESTON W.O. No. 04400-073-095-0003-00
Prepared by:
WORK PLAN
REMEDIAL DESIGN/SOLICITATION PACKAGE
PROJECT ASSISTANCE
REVISION I
CAROLINA TRANSFORMER SITE
FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. EPA Contract No. 68-W9-0057
Work Assignment No. 73-4NC2
Document Control No. 4400-73-AHPM
Date: 1/t /97
David Nelson, .G. r1
WESTON Work Assignment Manager
Technical Review / A~ ~-Performed by: :-#/2& -~ ,,;'.(
/il,t. Brian ~ee: PE
Date: 7-I -'lg
WESTON Project Engineer
Approved by: /~¥r~ ~ illiam R. Doyle
Date: 2/;b
WESTON Region IV Program Manager
Approved by: _____________ _ Date: --------Luis Flores
U.S. EPA Remedial Project Manager
Approved by: _____________ _ Date: --------Robert P. Stem
U.S. EPA Regional Project Officer
WESTON W.O. No. 04400-073-095-0003-00
NORIK: \WP\04400\073\WPDDN001 . DOC
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, lnc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Section
1
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Secti6n: Table of Contents
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
Page
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 1-1
1.1 Objective ............................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Site Background ................................................................................... 1-2
1.3 Selected Remedy ................................................................................... 1-5
I. 4 Work Plan Organization ........................................................................ 1-6
TECHNICAL SCOPE OF WORK ................................................. 2-1
2.1 Task I -Project Planning ...................................................................... 2-I
2.1.1 Review of Pertinent Documents ....................................................... 2-2
2.1.2 Pre-Design Coordination Meetings .................................................. 2-2
2.1.3 Prepare Draft and Final RD Work Plan ............................................ 2-2
2.2 Task 2 -Performance Specification Of Remedial Design And
Solicitation Package ................................................................................ 2-3
2.2.1 Design ............................................................................................. 2-4
2.2.2 Final Solicitation Package ................................................................ 2-5
2.3 Task 3 -Technical Support ................................................................. 2-5
2.4 Task 4 -Work Assignment Management .............................................. 2-6
2.5 Task 5 -Rd Data Collection ............................................................. 2-7 ?
2.5. I Site Vegetation ................................................................................ 2-7
2.5.2 Groundwater ................................................................................... 2-8
2.5.2.1
2.5.2.2
2.5.2.3
2.5.2.4
Groundwater Sampling ........................................................ 2-8
Existing Supply Well Data ................................................. 2-9
Extraction Well Installation...... . ............................... 2-9
Aquifer Testing.......... . ......................................... 2-9
NOR/K:\WP\044D0\073\WPDDN001. DOC
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Section
3
4
5
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: Table of Contents
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
2.5.3 Soil and Sediment Sampling ......................................................... 2-1 O
2.5.3.1
2.5.3.2
2.5.3.3
Soil Beneath Concrete ....................................................... 2-IO
Soil at Depth ...................................................................... 2-11
Sediment Sampling ............................................................ 2-12
2.5.4
2.5.5
2.5.6
2.5.7
2.5.8
2.5.9
2.5.10
Waste and Debris Characterization ............................................... 2-12
Characterization of Concrete Foundations and Slabs ...................... 2-13
Tanks and Transformers ................................................................ 2-14
Asbestos Survey ........................................................................... 2-14
IDW Drum Sampling ..................................................................... 2-15
Site S4rvey .................................................................................... 2-16
Reporting ...................................................................................... 2-16
PROJECT PLANNING SCHEDULE .............................................. 3-1
PROJECT PLANNING STAFF .................................................... 4-1
BUDGET AND PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS ............................. 5-1
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A -June 22, 1998, Letter From EPA Describing Amendment To The SOW
APPENDIX B -Schedule Of Activities
APPENDIX C -Resumes
NOR/K.\WP\04400\073\WPOON001.DOC II
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Figure
1-1
4-1
Table
3-1
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: Table or Contents
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Site Map ........................................................................................................... 1-3
Project Organization ........................................................................................ .4-2
LIST OF TABLES
Title
Carolina Transfonfier Site Schedule .................................................................. 3-2
NOR/K:\WP\044001073\WPDON001. DOC Ill
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
SECTION l
INTRODUCTION
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section; 1
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
The following document presents the Work Plan for the Performance· Specification Remedial
Design (RD) and Solicitation Package activities to be performed by Roy F. Weston, Inc.,
(WESTON@) for the EPA Region IV under the Alternative Remedial Contracts Strategy (ARCS)
contract. This revision of the 1995 Work Plan has been prepared in response to an amendment to
the original scope of work as issued by EPA. The amendment to the Scope of Work was issued
on June 22, 1998, in order to task WESTON to conduct additional activities at the Carolina
Transformer site, located in Fay,etteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina. Appendix A
presents the amended scope of work as presented in the revised work assignment.
The purpose of this amendment is to modify the existing Remedial Design Statement of Work.
The amendment adds one additional task -Task 5, RD Data Collection -to the RD for the
site. This task will allow WESTON to collect information necessary to fill data gaps in the current
RD. This information will also prevent data gaps and limit the number of options in the
development of the solicitation package for the site.
I. I OBJECTIVE
The objective of this Work Plan is to provide a description of WESTON's approach to
completing this work assignment including providing EPA technical, contractual, and engineering
support services to prepare a Performance Specification Remedial Design (RD) and Solicitation
Package to accomplish remediation of groundwater at the Carolina Transformer site.
NOR/K:IWPl044001073\WPOON001.00C 1-1
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, lnc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
1.2 SITE BACKGROUND
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 1
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
The Carolina Transformer site (the site) is located in Cumberland County, North Carolina,
approximately one mile northeast of Fayetteville and north of the intersection of U.S. Highway
301 and Middle and River Roads (Figure 1-1). The site consists of approximately 4.4 acres of
relatively flat terrain and is bounded on the north-northwest by a wooded, swamp-type area,
which is adjacent to an agricultural field and numerous homes; on the northwest and west by and
drainage ditch and by a dirt road that provides access to two homes; to the south by Middle Road,
Larry's Sausage Company, and Lundy Packing Company; and to the east by an agricultural field.
According to the Remedial Investigation (RI) and Record of Decision (ROD) documents as
produced by EPA, Carolina Tran$former Company (CTC) began recycling electrical transformers
and capacitors in 1967 and operated until 1982. In the course of the transformer rebuilding
business, CTC handled and stored at the site large numbers of electrical transformers which
contained oil laden with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). CTC did not apparently operate as a
PCB storage and disposal site for owners of PCB transformers or PCB articles. However, PCB
fluids were drained from transformers and were not properly stored and managed.
According to North Carolina Secretary of State's Corporate Division records, in 1979, Mr.
Kenneth Strothers started a new transformer company called Faytranco, which was located in
Fayetteville, North Carolina. In I 985, Faytranco was shut down and dissolved. According to EPA
records, CTC relocated and changed its name to Faytranco, Inc. in April 1982. According to a
deed dated November 29. 1984, the entire site was sold to Cumberland Electrical Repair, Inc. by
CTC through two individuals known as Mr. Pearson and Mr. Miller. A deed dated April 15, 1985,
indicates that Cumberland Electrical Repair, Inc. operated at the site for only about four and one-
half months before being ordered by the courts to return the property to CTC.
NOR/K.\WP\04400\073\WPODN001. DOC 1-2
LEGEND
~ TREES
wru.
S820
S840
S860 .,,.,.
"""' IIW08
MW09
I GRASS/SHRUBS
BUILDING/STRUCTURE
RUINS
FENCING
SITE BOUNDARY
NORTHING "5T1HG CASING
4TT525.70 2046280.9J 89.61
478350.S0 2046606.1-4 92.0J
477947.BJ 2046351.89 89.25
477931.98 2CWSJ52.28 91.41
478160 . .}J 20-4-6234.74 91.41
478198.93 2046456.67 91.06
478082.92 2046568.71 94.29
SOURCE: MURPHY YELLE ASSOCIATES
. (
D
8
0 '\. ,.
CAROLINA TRANSFORMER ..
oa
,.
0
MIDDLE ROAD
·' .,
0 0 ~ b---d
PROJECT TITLE:
CAROLINA TRANSFORMER SITE
fAYffiEVILLE, CUti.eBERLAHD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP DRAWN:
0
D
0
0
l
C. ADAMS
CHECKED:
flGURE 1-1
0 ~
\'\.
0
j
BAR GRAPH
DATE
7/1/98
.\ .
H\.
I .....
0
j
Inch = 000 ft.
DATE: APPROVED:
J
w
DATE:
0
l
W.O. NO.:
11821-019-100
CAD Fll.£ NAME:
CTSMAP
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. II shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 1
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
The RI and Post Remedial Investigation (PR!) of 1993 have revealed soil, surface water, and
groundwater contamination. The contaminants of concern have been determined to include PCBs,
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and metals. Reportedly, all of the contamination detected
has occurred within the shallow aquifer beneath the site and the contamination of groundwater is
contained within site boundaries. Geologic evidence from the RI and PR! indicates that a very
thick (approximately 100 feet), low permeability clay layer underlies the surficial aquifer that
possibly prevents downward migration of potential contaminants.
The investigation conducted by EPA has revealed PCB contamination in surface water contained
in the drainage ditch that runs through the site and into a wooded area southwest of the site. In
addition, PCBs were revealed in the surface water of a low-lying marsh located to the northwest
of the site. One metal ( copper) and one VOC [bis, (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate] was also detected in
the surface water samples.
The EPA RI investigation also documented that soils and sediments throughout the western and
southern portions of the site contain moderate to high levels of PCB compounds. Composite
soil/debris samples collected during the 1990 RI from the main building, maintenance building,
and burn building revealed PCBs at levels as high as 2200 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). The
highest soil levels were found in on-site soil samples west of the main building and east of the
raised foundation; however, PCBs and other contaminants have been detected off site as well,
especially in drainage ditches that emanate from the site. Other soil contaminants include
pesticides, VOCs, and high levels of copper, mercury, and arsenic.
NOR/K. IWP\0440010731WPDDN001 . DOC 1-4
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
1.3 SELECTED REMEDY
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 1
Revision: 1
Dale: July 1998
The selected remedy is designed to address the groundwater contamination at the site. The
remedy was chosen in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) requirements, to the extent practicable, the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), the detailed analysis
of the alternatives using the nine criteria, and public comments. Both EPA and the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources have determined that Alternative G-4
from the ROD is the most appropriate remedy for the Carolina Transformer site. The major
components of the selected remedy include:
• Contaminated groundwater above applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements
(ARARs) will be extracted from the surficial aquifer using extraction wells.
• Groundwater extraction wells will be installed into the surficial aquifer. Monitoring wells
will be installed into the lower aquifer to determine contamination status.
• The extracted groundwater will be treated in a two-stage system for removal of metal and
organic contaminants. The treatment system shall include an electrochemical removal
system followed by an activated carbon adsorption system.
• The treated groundwater will be discharged to the Fayetteville Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW)
• The extraction system will operate for a period of IO years, during which time system
performance will be monitored on a regular basis and adjusted as warranted. For those
wells where extraction has ceased, monitoring will be on an occurrence of every 5 years to
ensure that cleanup goals continue to be maintained.
• Engineering and institutional controls as well as other measures will be enacted if it is
determined that certain portions of the aquifer cannot be restored to their beneficial use.
The RD will describe in detail the steps necessary to implement this remedy.
NOR/K. \WP\044001073\WPDON001. DOC 1-5
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA
1.4 WORK PLAN ORGANIZATION
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 1
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
The remainder of this work plan contains WESTON' s approach to preparing the Performance
Specification RD and Solicitation Package for groundwater remediation at the Carolina
Transformer site. Brief summaries of the remaining section are presented below:
• Section 2 describes the step by step approach in preparing the Groundwater RD and
Solicitation Package including data evaluation, preparation of the performance based
specification/solicitation package for the remediation system, a description of the design
process, other technical support activities, and task management.
• Section 3 provides a preliminary schedule of activities to be performed during this work
assignment.
• Section 4 presents the project staff that will be involved on all phases of this effort.
• Section 5 describes the budget and personnel requirements to complete the tasks
presented in Section 2.
NOR/K. \WP\044001073\WPOONOO 1. DOC 1-6
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: Juty 1998
SECTION 2
TECHNICAL SCOPE OF WORK
This section outlines the elements of the amendment to the original Statement of Work (SOW),
dated September 22, 1995, which reflects the requirements of the ROD and forms the basis for
preparation of this Work Plan. The amended SOW was received by WESTON on June 22, 1998.
The SOW to develop the RD and Solicitation Package includes the following tasks:
Task 1
Task 2
Task 3
Task 4
Task 5
Project Planning
Performan9e-Based Remedial Design and Solicitation Package
Technical Support
Work Assignment Management
RD Data Collection
The approach for implementing the components described m the SOW 1s discussed m the
following sections of the work plan.
2.1 TASK I -PROJECT PLANNING
Task I consists of the work efforts related to the initiation of the design project. The project
planning tasks contained in the EPA SOW are presented below.
NQR/K: IWP\04400\073\WPODN001.00C 2-1
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
2.1.l Review of Pertinent Documents
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
To aid in the design of the remediation system, pertinent documents will be reviewed. Documents
to be reviewed are, at minimum, the Rl report, ROD, and the SOW prepared for the Carolina
Transformer site.
2.1.2 Pre-design Coordination Meetings
A meeting between WESTON and EPA shall be held in Atlanta during the planning stage of the
RD to ensure that WESTON and EPA are in agreement on the overall project approach. The
meeting will be held during the initial stages of the RD Work Plan. Up to three representatives
from WESTON will be present a9he meeting.
2.1.3 Prepare Draft and Final RD Work Plan
WESTON has prepared this addendum to the existing work plan in order to incorporate the
additional task, Task 5, as well as other affected tasks (Tasks I and 4), and to describe our
technical approach and costs for the RD of the Carolina Transformer site. The technical approach
includes preparing draft and final documents of the Performance Specification RD and Solicitation
Package. As part of this effort, WESTON will submit a draft amended Remedial Design/
Solicitation Package Work Plan to EPA for review and comment. After receiving comments from
EPA, WESTON will incorporate the comments and a final version of the amended Work Plan will
be submitted to EPA. The draft and final Work Plans are being prepared in accordance with the
June 22, 1998, amendment to the SOW. Detailed cost estimates will be provided in the draft and
final Work Plans as specified in the original September 22 SOW.
NOR/K IWP\04400\0731WPDON001.00C 2-2
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
In addition, WESTON will prepare and submit a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) as part of the
draft and final Work Plans. The SAP will include a Quality Assurance Project Plan, Field
Sampling Plan, and a Data Management Plan.
Copies of each deliverable are required as follows:
Deliverable Description
Draft Work Plan (including SAP)
Final Work Plan (including SAP)
No. of Copies
3
3
One copy of all the major documents submitted shall be unbound in a reproducible form.
2,2 TASK 2-PERFOMIANCE SPECIFICATION OF REMEDIAL DESIGN AND
SOLICITATION PACKAGE
A Revision O performance-based design and solicitation package has been prepared for
groundwater remediation at the Carolina Transformer site and was submitted to EPA on March
18, 1996. This Revision O bid package was approved by EPA on September 30, I 996. Using the
data that will be generated from activities associated with Task 5, WESTON will work closely
with EPA to determine the appropriate remediation performance standards for use in the Revision
I design package that will best achieve the overall remediation goals outlined in the ROD.
Previous performance-based designs shall be evaluated to identify approaches, strategies, and
methods found to be successful in previous work on performance-based RDs. The following items
will be prepared in support of this task:
NOR/K:IWP\04400\073\WPDON00 1. DOC 2-3
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1996
• Final Performance Specifications (including Final Bid Schedule and Final Cost Estimate)
• Final Remedial Action Contractor Documentation Requirements
• Solicitation Package
2.2.1 Design
After collecting and analyzing groundwater data during activities associated with Task 5, a
Revision I performance-based design will be prepared and submitted to EPA. The document will
include the appropriate remediation performance standards that will best achieve the overall
remediation goals.
The design documents shall stat: that the work performed by the offeror shall include the
construction and operation of the·groundwater extraction and treatment system and development
of a site monitoring plan for system performance Operation and maintenance (O&M) will be
described in the offeror's O&M plan (including a plan to minimize down time). The description of
required activities will explain that the offeror shall be required to perform O&M through the
duration of the contract. A final O&M Manual shall be submitted to EPA 18 months prior to the
expiration of their contract. At the conclusion of the contract, the offeror shall be prepared to
train a new operator.
A cost estimate and schedule for projected remedial activities for use by EPA and WESTON
primarily to evaluate contractor bids will be provided. The RA estimate will include labor,
materials, operation, and other expenses for all contractor services pursuant to the remedial
action. The cost estimate will essentially be a refinement of the cost estimate presented in the
Feasibility Study report. The projected RA schedule shall include a period for contract
negotiations and other long-lead procurement items. The schedule shall be based on information
NOR/K\WP\04400\073\WPDDN001. DOC 2-4
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, ln whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
obtained from state agencies (e.g., discharge requirements), input from selected vendors, and
WESTON's experience on similar remedial actions.
WESTON will incorporate EPA's comments on the Draft Design plus drafts of the cost estimate
and schedule. Three copies (including one unbound copy) of the Final Design and Draft
Solicitation package will be submitted to EPA.
2.2.2 Final Solicitation Package
Comments on the Revision I Solicitation Package will be incorporated in the final document.
Three copies (including one unbound copy) of the Final Solicitation Package will be submitted.
The solicitation package shall be ~eady for bid advertisement.
2.3 TASK 3-TECHNICAL SUPPORT
A variety of design support activities for the remediation system will be performed during the RD,
including assistance in determining the discharge requirements for the treated water. For costing
purposes, it is assumed that, as a CERCLA site, a discharge permit need not be obtained, but
rather the design and remediation must satisfy the substantive requirements for a discharge permit.
It is also assumed that the treated water will be discharged to the POTW.
In addition, one WESTON representative will attend two meetings m Fayetteville, North
Carolina. The trips may be for negotiation of discharge approval, to attend a public meeting, or
other purposes. For costing purposes, it is assumed that the trips will not require an overnight
stay. WESTON has not been requested to provide logistical support for any of the meetings.
NOR/K:IWP\044001073\WPDONOO 1. DOC 2-5
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
Because Carolina Transformer is a CERCLA site, it is assumed that a permit for the discharge of
treated groundwater will not be needed. If the eventual discharge point is considered to be off site
and a permit is required, the schedule will be significantly impacted, since the permit limits must
be determined prior to finalizing the remedial design. An NP DES permit from the State of North
Carolina is typically issued approximately nine months after the permit application is submitted.
2.4 TASK 4 -WORK ASSIGNMENT MANAGEMENT
Work Assignment Management and project close-out shall be done in accordance with the ARCS
contract required protocol. Project management and QA activities will include dedication of
appropriate, qualified staff to perform tasks outlined in this Work Plan, internal QA reviews on all
deliverables, tracking of budget ~nd schedule milestones, monthly and financial status reporting,
providing overall project direction and coordination, and project close-out.
WESTON's monthly reports will include the following, at a minimum:
1. Identification of the site and the activity.
2. Status of the activity, a description of the work completed, and actions taken to
correct any problems.
3. Activities planned for the following month.
4. Percentage of the work completed for this WA.
5. Expenditures (including fee) and direct labor hours expended for the previous
month.
NORIK: IWP\0440010731WPDDN001. DOC 2-6
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: t
Date: July 1998
6. Cumulative expenditures (including fee) and direct labor hours expended, and the
percent expended to total obligated dollar amount and hours.
7. Projection of expenditures to project completion, including an explanation of any
significant variation from the project budget.
2.5 TASK 5-RD DATA COLLECTION
The purpose of this task is to allow WESTON to collect data specified below to fill current data
gaps in the RD and reduce the number of options during development of the solicitation package.
This task will involve collection of samples from site matrices including groundwater, soil, and
sediment. In addition, debris at _the site and the concrete foundations and slabs will be sampled.
Other site issues will be addressed, as described below, including on-site tanks and transformers,
asbestos, drums, site vegetation, and survey of the area.
2.5.1 Site Vegetation
Currently, portions of the site are covered by vegetation including weeds, grasses, shrubs, and
trees. Due to the difficulty of determining if there is any hidden waste within the vegetation and to
eliminate this as another task within the site solicitation package, WESTON will remove all
current vegetation on site. This includes cutting of all current plant life on site up to the perimeter
of the site. Weeds and grasses will be cut to ground surface while shrubs and trees will be cut to
within 2 to 3 inches of ground surface. WESTON will focus on not removing potentially
contaminated surface soils from the site.
NOR/K. \WP\04400\073\WPODN001 . DOC 2-7
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
All vegetation cut on site will be disposed of off site in the Cumberland County Municipal Solid
Waste Landfill. After the site is cleared of vegetation, WESTON will perform a site walk-through
to identify all potentially unidentified waste and debris locations and to note the contents of each
location, if warranted. If additional types of waste or debris are discovered that are not currently
addressed in this SOW, WESTON will report this to EPA for discussion on future handling of the
waste. WESTON will ensure that all on-site waste is characterized for the purpose of disposal
prior to the completion of the site solicitation package.
2.5.2 Groundwater
Prior to the issuance of the final groundwater solicitation package, WESTON will collect
information about the aquifer underlying the site by collecting samples of groundwater, locating
existing wells, and conducting an aquifer test.
2.5.2.1 Groundwater Sampling
WESTON will collect groundwater samples from four existing monitor wells at the site -MW-
06, MW-07, MW-08, and MW-09 -and analyze the samples for metals and PCB contents.
I
Reportedly, previous sample collection and analyses from these wells has revealed elevated levels
of metals and the presence of PCBs in the aquifer. In order to confirm these previous results for
the design of the groundwater solicitation package, WESTON will collect samples from these
wells; however, to reduce the content of fine sediment within the samples, WESTON will utilize
low flow sampling procedures.
Low flow sampling guidelines presented in the EPA Science and Ecosystem Services Division
May 1996 Environmental Investigation Standard Operating Procedure and Quality Assurance
NOR/K. \WP\044001073\WPDDN001. DOC 2-8
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
Manual will be utilized for this sampling event. Additional procedures to be followed during this
event are discussed within the accompanying Sampling and Analysis Plan.
2.5.2.2 Existing Supply Well Data
WESTON will interview local residences that utilize water supply wells to determine the
construction and pumping capacities of their wells. WESTON will search for those wells that are
installed within the surficial or upper aquifer. WESTON will use this information to better
determine potential pumping rates for the design of the pump-and-treat system within the
groundwater solicitation package.
2.5.2.3 Extraction Well Installation
After determining the construction of nearby residential wells and examining the construction of
existing on-site monitor wells, WESTON will install one extraction well at a location to be
determined based upon groundwater sample analysis results. This well will be installed within the
shallow or upper aquifer. Prior to installation, WESTON will discuss the sample analysis results
with the EPA RPM.
The methods of installation, materials to be used during construction, and subsequent
development of the well are further discussed in the accompanying Sampling and Analysis Plan.
2.5.2.4 Aquifer Testing
In an effort to determine potential flow rates and hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer underlying
the site, WESTON will conduct a constant rate aquifer test within the newly installed extraction
NOR/K \WP\04400\073\WPDONOOl . DOC 2-9
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
well. Prior to conducting the constant rate test, WESTON will conduct a step-drawdown test
within this well to determine the capacity of long-term pumping. Following the step-drawdown
test, WESTON will conduct a constant rate test within the extraction well at a flow rate
determined during the step-drawdown test. The constant rate test is expected to last
approximately 36 hours.
The pumping tests will require the use of a large tank to hold and store the groundwater purged
from the well. In similar projects, WESTON has rented a "frac" tank for holding the groundwater
discharged for sampling prior to disposal. WESTON will rent two tanks for this test. Other
equipment to be utilized during the test includes pumps, flow meters, and water level monitoring
equipment.
2.5.3 Soil and Sediment Sampling
WESTON will collect and analyze soil and sediment samples from areas described m the
following subsections.
2.5.3.1 Soil Beneath Concrete
Although a majority of site soil was sampled during the Remedial Investigation study, samples of
soil were not collected from areas beneath the concrete foundations and slabs. In order to prevent
this from being an option within the soil solicitation package, WESTON will collect samples from
areas underneath the concrete. WESTON will utilize the grid system established by EPA during
the RI to collect the samples. One sample will be collected per grid covering the concrete
foundation or slab. Approximately IO percent of the samples will be analyzed for PCB content
according to EPA Method 8081 and will be submitted to a laboratory in the EPA Contract
NOR/K. \WP\04400\073\WPDON00l . DOC 2-10
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. II shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
Laboratory Program (CLP). The remainder of the samples will be screened using PCB
immunoassay kits. The immunoassay kits will provide WESTON with real-time PCB
concentration data to the nearest 0.1 mg/kg.
The methods of sampling, materials to be used during sampling, decontamination procedures, and
disposal procedures of excess soil are discussed in the accompanying Sampling and Analysis Plan.
2.5.3.2 Soil at Depth
During the RI, soil samples were collected to a depth of 10 inches below ground surface (bgs).
Sample analytical results from that effort revealed PCB concentrations as great as 1000 milligrams
per kilogram (mg/kg) at the I 0-inch interval. In order to determine the vertical extent of PCB
contamination in soil beneath the site and to accurately define soil volumes for the soil solicitation
package, WESTON will collect soil samples from the 18 to 24 inches bgs interval from certain
grid locations as established by EPA during the RJ. Approximately 10 percent of the samples will
be analyzed for PCB content by an EPA CLP laboratory according to EPA Method 8082, with
the remainder screened on site using PCB immunoassay kits.
The soil sampling effort, as much as possible, will be within 15 grid locations established by EPA
during the R1 where samples collected at depth were found to contain 25 mg/kg or greater of
PCBs. In addition, at three locations where samples collected at depth were found to exceed I 00
mg/kg of PCBs, WESTON will continue to sample at depth at one-foot intervals past the 24-inch
bgs zone until immunoassay kit testing reveals PCB levels are not greater than I mg/kg.
The methods of sampling, materials to be used during sampling, decontamination procedures, and
disposal procedures of excess soil are discussed in the accompanying Sampling and Analysis Plan.
NOR/K:IWP\04400\073\WPODN001.D0C 2-11
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
2.5.3.3 Sediment Sampling
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
During the RI, sediment samples were collected from off-site portions of drainage ditches along
the western and eastern boundaries of the site. Sediment samples from off-site locations along the
western boundary drainage ditch revealed concentrations as high as 260 mg/kg. The sal1)ples from
the drainage ditch on the eastern boundary of the site revealed concentrations as high as 15
mg/kg. Due to the amount of time elapsed since the completion of the RI (approximately eight
years), WESTON will collect samples from the drainage ditches to determine the present
concentration and extent of PCB contamination in the sediment.
Approximately nine sediment samples will be collected from off-site locations along the drainage
ditch on the western perimeter o[the site. Four sediment samples, two north and two south of the
drainage ditch, will be collected at off-site locations along the drainage ditch on the eastern
perimeter of the site. Approximately ten percent of the total sample amount will be issued to the
EPA CLP system for analysis of PCB content according to EPA Method 8082. The rest of the
samples will be analyzed using immunoassay kits.
The sampling method, materials to be used during sampling, decontamination procedures, and
sample analytical methods are discussed further in the accompanying Sampling and Analysis Plan.
2.5.4 Waste and Debris Characterization
As a result of activities associated with the site, various piles of debris are strewn throughout. the
site. The piles include wood pallets, electrical equipment, drums and cans, capacitors, and other
miscellaneous items. In order to characterize the waste and determine appropriate disposal during
NOR/K ·\WP\04400\0731WPDON001. DOC 2-12
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, ln whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
the RA, WESTON will collect samples of the wood pallets, capacitors, and other electrical
hardware.
Each of the samples will be analyzed for TCLP Metals according to EPA Method 60 I 0, TCLP
semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) according to EPA Method 8270C, and TCLP
Pesticides/PCBs according to EPA Method 808 I. The sampling method, materials to be used
during sampling, decontamination procedures, and sample analytical methods are discussed
further in the accompanying Sampling and Analysis Plan.
2.5.5 Characterization of Concrete Foundations and Slabs
During the R1 for the Carolina Transformer site, soil and debris samples were scraped from the
floors of the building that remained on .site. PCB 1260 concentrations were found to range up to
2,200 mg/kg. Other contaminants including pesticides, VOCs, metals, dioxins, and furans were
also detected in these samples. Due to the prior use of various materials on or above these floors
and, as witnessed during the June 5, 1998, site visit, cracks in the concrete pads are allowing
water to percolate through the concrete, WESTON will collect samples of the concrete to
characterize the material and determine the disposal method of the material during the RA.
Approximately I 5 samples of the concrete will be collected during the investigation. The sample
locations will be according to the grid system established by EPA during the 1989 R1
investigation. According to. the _grid system, the following number of samples will be collected
from the concrete pads:
• Main site building -5 samples
• Former garage area -2 samples
NOR/K: \WP\04400\073\WPDDN001. DOC 2-13
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
• Concrete foundation and slab - 4 samples
• Concrete pads -4 samples
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
The samples will be analyzed for TCLP Pesticides/PCBs according to EPA Method 8081 and
TCLP SVOCs according to EPA Method 8270C. The sampling method, materials to be used
during sampling, decontamination procedures, and sample analytical methods are discussed
further in the accompanying Sampling and Analysis Plan.
2.5.6 Tanks and Transformers
During the site visit of June 5, 1998, WESTON noted that there were four underground storage
tanks (US Ts)° and six transformers on site. One of the US Ts was found to be dry during this visit.
,
In order to characterize and determine correct disposal methods of the liquids and to determine
the liquid volume, WESTON will sample the content of each tank and transformer, remove the
contents of each, and store the liquids on site prior to disposal during the RA.
Each of the samples from the USTs will be analyzed for PCB and SVOC content according to
EPA Methods 8082 and 8270C, respectively. Each fluid sample from the transformers will be
analyzed for PCB content according to EPA Method 8082. The sampling method, materials to be
used during sampling, decontamination procedures, and sample analytical methods are discussed
further in the accompanying Sampling and Analysis Plan.
2.5. 7 Asbestos Survey
In order to characterize the mam site building and other areas around the site for potential
asbestos content, WESTON will perform an asbestos survey across the site area. During the
survey, WESTON will examine the site buildings or remnants thereof for evidence of asbestos in
NORIK:\WP\04400\073\WPOON001. DOC 2-14
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
floor tile, dry wall, roofs, and electrical equipment. Debris across the site will also be examined for
potential asbestos content. WESTON assumes that approximately 20 bulk samples will be
collected during the survey. This information will be used to reduce potential contract options
within the performance-based specification remedial design.
2.5.8 IDW Drum Sampling
During the previous RI and post-RI efforts, drums were used to store the investigative derived
wastes (IDW), including soil, water, and personal protective equipment. EPA has requested that
the drum contents be characterized for disposal purposes for the RA. Specifically, drums
containing a mixture of soil and water and water only will be sampled for characterization. Drums
containing soil only will not be sampled. The contents of the soil only drums will be disposed of
by the on-site remedial activities during the RA.
According to information gained during the June 5, l 998, site visit, there are approximately I 00
IDW drums on site, all of which are stored in the main site building. In order to reduce costs of
sampling, WESTON will determine the number of drums of each type of IDW, reposition the
drums to areas of similar contents, and collect a composite sample(s) that is based on a
percentage of the total number of drums of similar content. WESTON anticipates collecting no
greater than IO percent composite samples of the total for each content type.
The composite samples will be analyzed for PCB and SVOC content according to EPA Methods
8081 and 8270C, respectively. The sampling method, materials to be used during sampling,
decontamination procedures, and sample analytical methods are discussed further in the
accompanying Sampling and Analysis Plan.
NOR/K:IWP\04400\073\WPDON001. DOC 2-15
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
2.5.9 Site Survey
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 2
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
In order to verify volumes of soil and other materials that will be removed or treated during the
RA, WESTON will procure and oversee a subcontractor for surveying the horizontal and vertical
location of points established by WESTON during the investigation into the extent of soil
contamination. The surveyor will be required to be registered within the State of North Carolina.
Each point will be located according to the State Plane Grid of North Carolina.
2.5. l O Reporting
Following completion of all field activities and receipt of all analytical data, WESTON will
analyze, tabulate, and map the da!il. This information will be included in a report that presents the
following:
• Introduction including purpose of report and site history.
• Discussion ofWESTON's activities on site detailed in a task-by-task format.
• Presentation of analytical data, if collected, and discussion of the data with reference to
the site.
• Presentation of additional items generated by activities on site.
• Discussion of findings relative to the performance specification packages for soil and
groundwater.
• Conclusion and discussion of field activities.
The report will be presented to EPA in a draft form for review and comment thirty days after
receipt of all analytical data.
N0R/K.IWP\04400\073\WPDON001.DOC 2-16
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
SECTION 3
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 3
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
PROJECT PLANNING SCHEDULE
This section provides a tentative schedule for all investigative work and all significant task
deliverables outlined in the Work Plan. A Gantt Chart of the major tasks and deliverables is
provided in Appendix B. Table 3-1 provides a history of deliverables previously submitted and a
tentative schedule for all task deliverables outlined in this Work Plan. This schedule corresponds
to the amended SOW received from EPA on June 22, I 998 (Appendix A).
After completing the attached proposed schedule, using as realistic dates and task duration
periods as possible, WESTON h.is found that the proposed date of submittal of the first draft of
the RD Data Collection Report will be the week of September 23, 1998, but not before.
In order to complete the schedule as proposed, WESTON made several assumptions, which are
incorporated into the schedule. The assumptions are as follows:
• The investigative activities in this Work Plan and necessary funding will be approved by
EPA on or before July 17, 1998.
• Subcontractor procurement, including Agency concurrence on the selection of a
subcontractor for a well driller, will occur within a 14-day period.
• EPA will assist WESTON in obtaining access to private property at the site, where
necessary.
• All laboratory analysis of site debris, concrete, and transformer and tank fluid samples will
be through a commercial laboratory that is equipped and certified to perform CLP
protocol analyses, rather than through the CLP program. This will greatly decrease the
turn-around time for data receipt. All soil, sediment, and groundwater samples will be
analyzed in the CLP program.
NOR/K. \WP\04400\073\WPODN001.DOC 3-1
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
Table 3-1
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Sile
Section: 3
Revision; 1
Date: July 1998
Carolina Transformer Site Schedule
Milestones/Deliverables Approximate Dates
Submittal of Draft Work Plan November 16, 1995
Draft Performance Bid Specification for March 18, 1996
Groundwater
Draft Perfonnance Bid Specification for September 30, 1996
Groundwater Approval
Receipt of Work Plan Addendum June 26, 1998
Submittal of Revision I Work Plan July 2, 1998
Approval of Revision I WQrk Plan July 17, 1998
RD Data Collection Field'Activities July 27, 1998
Completion of Field Activities August 2 I, I 998
Receipt of Anal)tical Data August 28, I 998
Submittal of Revision O RD Data Collection Report September 23, 1998
Submittal of Revision I Groundwater Remedial October 2. 1998
Action Solicitation Package
Comments on RD Data Collection Report and October 30, I 998
Groundwater RA Solicitation Package
Final RD Data Collection Report November 13, 1998
Final Groundwater RA Solicitation Package November 13. 1998
NOR/K:IWP\04400\073\WPODN001.DOC 3-2
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 3
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
• EPA will review each issuance of a draft report expeditiously and within a 21-day period
and will submit comments to WESTON by the 21st day of this period.
• WESTON will act to produce and manage all field-related activities in an expeditious
manner within health and safety protocols and according to the field guidance standards
(May 1996) issued by the Science and Ecosystems Support Division of EPA.
• WESTON will produce and issue all reports within the time periods stated on the
proposed schedule. ·
WESTON realizes that this proposed schedule is aggressive and may not allow for unanticipated
delays that may arise.
NOR/K.IWP\04400\073\WPOON001 DOC 3-3
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
SECTION 4
PROJECT PLANNING STAFF
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 4
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
The following WESTON personnel have been designated to the work assignment for the Carolina
Transformer project:
Program Manager -William R. Doyle
Work Assignment Manager -David D. Nelson, P.G.
Technical Review -Brian R. Magee, P.E., Ralph P. McKeen, P.E.
Geologists -David D. Nelson, P.G., Charles Adams
Contract Administrator -Chandra M. Norton
Resumes of these key individuals are provided in Appendix C.
Figure 4-1 depicts the Project Organization.
NOR/K:IWP\04400\073\WPDDN001. DOC 4-1
NOR/K:\WP\04400\073\0RGOOI.PPT
Figure 4-1
Project Organization
Carolina Transformer Site
U.S. EPA REGION IV
Remedial Project Manager
Luis Flores
ROY F. WESTON, INC.
Program Manager
William R. Doyle
Work Assignment Manager Contract Administrator
David D. Nelson, P.G. -.... Chandra McNeil-Norton
Technical Review Field Geologist
Brian R. Magee, P.E. ....-Charles Adams Ralph P. McKeen, P.E.
•
•
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
SECTION 5
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: 5
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
BUDGET AND PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS
The budget and personnel requirements are detailed on the Optional Form 60R contained in this
section. The budget reflects WESTON' s best estimate of the labor and resources necessary to
accomplish this project in accordance with the SOW detailed in Section 2.
The number of copies of each major draft deliverable prepared for EPA will be according to the
SOW. Other assumptions regarding duration of design effort, EPA's review schedule, and
WESTON deliverables have been included in the task descriptions in Section 2.
The project will be directed by WESTON's Region IV Program Manager, William R. Doyle. The
WA Manager, David Nelson, P.G., will oversee the day-to-day activities. Mr. Nelson will also
have the responsibility for maintaining the project budget and schedule.
Quality assurance for the remedial design performance specifications will be provided by Brian
Magee, P.E., and Ralph McKeen, P.E. Resumes for these key project personnel are included in
Appendix C. Other personnel will be used to accomplish various design activities as appropriate.
NOR/K:IWP\044001073\WPODN001. DOC 5-1
• •
CONTRACT PRICING PROPOSAL
(Research and Development)
Office of Management and Budget
Approval No. 29-R-0 I 84
This form is/or use when (IJ submission ofcOst or
pricing data is required and {ii) submission/or the
Optional Form 99 is authorized by contracting officer.
Page No.: No. of Pages:
2
Name of Offeror: Supplies and/or Services to be Furnished:
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Home Office Address:
Weston Way
West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380
Division and Location(s) where work to be performed:
Atlanta, GA
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF COST ELEMENTS
I. DIRECT MATERIAL
2. MA TE RIAL OVERHEAD
3. DIRECT LABOR: EST HRS
See Exhibit A 1,410.0
TOTAL DIRECT LABOR
4. LABOR OVERHEAD: O.H.RATE
113.24%
TOTAL LABOR OVERHEAD
5. SPECIAL TESTING:
6. SPECIAL EQUIPMENT:
7. TRAVEL: a. Transportation (See Table 3)
b. Per Diem & Subsistence (See Table 3)
TOTAL TRAVEL
8. POOL SUBCONTRACTORS
TOTAL POOL SUBCONTRACTORS
9. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
Work Plan Revision 2
Carolina Transformer
Fayetteville, North Carolina
Total Proposal Amount:
168,220
RATE/HR EST COST
36,076
X BASE= EST COST
36,076 40,853
6,918
6,608
EST COST
TOTAL DIRECT COST AND OVERHEAD
11. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE (See Table I)
12. FACILITIES CAPITAL COST OF MONEY (FCC (See Table I)
13. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
14. FEE OR PROFIT a. All Base Fees After FCCM (See Table 2-1)
b. All Award Fees (See Table 2-1)
15. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST AND FEE OR PROFIT
Solicitation No.
W.A. #73-4NC2
TOTAL COST
36,076
40,853
13,526
22,930
22,581
135,966
18,823
1,717
156,506
2,542
9,174
168,220
• • This proposal is submitted for use in conjunction with and in response to (Describe RFP, etc.) Contract No. 68-W9-0057,
Work Assignment No. 73-4NC2, Remedial Design and reflects our basic estimates as of this date.
'
TYPED NAME AND TITLE SIGNATURE IJ hJJL
William R. Doyle, Program Manager (, 'w.1~~, }1 JJt~ /4., //ff{;)
V
NAME OF FIRM DA TE OF SUBMISSION
Roy F. Weston, Inc. July 02, 1998
EXHIBIT A -SUPPORTING SCHEDULE
3. DIRECT LABOR Category Hours Rate Est Cost
Professional 4 24.0 52.16 1,252
Professional 3 294.0 30.52 8,973
Professional 2 886.0 22.75 20,157
Professional I 12.0 16.97 204
Technician 2 194.0 18.35 3,560
Professional Total 1,410.0 34,145
Clerical 2 185.0 10.44 1,931
0
Support T9tal 185.0 1,93 I
,
Total Direct Labor 1,595.0 36,076
9. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
External ODCs (See Table 4) 13,600
Internal ODCs (See Table 4) 8,981
22,581
I. Has any Executive Agency of the United States government performed any review of your accounts
or records in conn_ection with any other government prime contract or subcontract within the past
year? X Yes -No
Name and address of reviewing office and individual Telephone Number/Extension
DCAA, 1421 Cherry St, Philadelphia, PA 19102, Robert Kozube\, Super. Auditor
II. Will you require the use of any government property in the performance of this proposed
contract? Yes XNo
Ill. Do you require government contract financing to perfonn this proposed contract?
X Yes No (If yes, identify.): Advance payments X Progress payments Guaranteed loans
IV. Do you now hold any contract for the same or similar work called for by this contract?
X Yes No (If yes, identify.): This is an amendment to Contract No. 68-W9-0057
V. Does this cost summary conform with the cost principles set forth in Agency regulations?
X Yes No
CAROLINA TRANSFORMER
WDS
Task/ACTIVITY
REMEDIAL DESIGN
I Project Planning
la Data Review
lb Coordination' Meetings
le Drafi Remedial Design Work Plan
Id Final Remedial Design Work Plan ,, RD Data Collection Mgmt.
2 Performance ·specification RD
2a Draft Performance Specs.
2b Final Performance Srx-cs.
2c Solicitation Package
3 Technical Support
5 RD Data Collection
Sa Site Cleai-ing
Sb Site Sampling
Sc Asbestos Sur\"ey
Sd ID\V Drum Sampling
5, On-Site Transformers
5r Underground Storage Tanks
5g Extraction Well Installation
Sh Aquifer Test
Si Sampling and Analysis Plan
Sj Reporting
Task Mgmt & QA
WORK ASSIGNMENT TOTALS
• • • Confidential • • •
Prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc.,
for U.S. EPA Contract 68-W9-0057
(]) (2)
LABOR-LABOR-
PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT
HRS s HRS '
24 1,363 I 22
12 873 0 0
66 3,488 24 534
28 1,511 12 267
29 1,602 6 134
170 9,608 26 579
53 3,031 16 356
51 2,868 16 356
114 6,442 16 356
219 9,S92 8 178
117 S,805 4 89
27 1,406 2 45
16 776 0 0
IS 824 0 0
II 629 0 0
22 l,l00 0 0
167 7,724 0 0
62 3,118 24 534
109 5,549 20 445
98 5,498 IO 223
1,410 72,808 185 4.118
(]) (4). (5) (6) (7)
INT. EXT. SUB
TRAVEL ooc-s ODC'S POOL G&A
s s s s 18.09'¼
0 39 0 0 251
37 0 5 0 166
0 270 40 0 735
0 129 35 0 328
0 94 70 0 327
0 1,070 125 0 1,865
0 361 55 0 623
0 195 95 0 600
1,191 177 75 0 1,459
2,954 87 2,S50 5,000 2,763
3,952 1,449 2,96S 11,930 2,317
724 117 95 0 410
0 0 145 0 167
0 3,S40 45 2,000 157
0 0 1,575 0 399
724 0 250 4,000 375
3,944 800 5,200 0 3,051
0 115 65 0 672
0 115 45 0 1,093
0 424 1(,5 0 1,065
13,526 8,981 13,600 22.930 18,823
TABLE3-1
WORK ASSIGNMENT SUMMARY
(8) (9) (JO) (II)
TOTAL BASE POOL SUE
COST FCCM FEE BASE FEE
s s 3.0% 2.5%
1,675 30 19 0
1,081 19 14 0
5,067 86 58 0
2,270 38 26 0
2,226 37 27 0
13,247 218 147 0
4,426 73 49 0
4,115 69 48 0
9,701 149 137 0
23,124 223 318 125
28,507 144 310 298
2,797 33 47 0
1,088 17 16 0
6,S66 18 13 so
2,603 18 61 0
6,4S0 26 47 100
20,719 189 408 0
4,504 78 53 0
7,247 128 86 0
7,374 123 86 0
154,786 1,717 1,969 573
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer
Revision: 2
Date: July 02, 1998
Page 3 of6
( 12) ( 13) (14)
AWARI POOL SUI TOTAL
FEE AW. FEE WITH
7.t)•/4 2.5% ALL FEE
115 0 1,839
76 0 1,189
336 0 5,547
150 0 2,484
149 0 2,439
852 0 14,465
285 0 4,833
274 0 4,507
667 0 J0,653
1,263 125 25,178
1,059 298 30,616
188 0 3,065
76 0 1,197
72 50 6,768
182 0 2,864
I7I 100 6,895
1,394 0 22,71 I
307 0 4,943
499 0 7,960
487 0 8,0(,9
8,601 S73 168,220
•
•
CAROLINA TRANSFORMER
wus
Task/ACTIVITY
REMEDIAL DESIGN
I Project Planning
la Data Review
lb Coordinati0n Meetings
le Draft Remedial Design Work Plan
Id Final Remedial Design Work Plan
le RD Data Collection Mgmt.
2 Performance Specification RD
2a Draft Pcrfonmmce Specs.
2b Final Performance Specs.
2c Solicitation Package
3 Technical Support
s RD Data Collection
5a Site Clearing
Sb Site Sampling
Sc Asbestos Sun:ey
5d IDW Drum Sampling
Sc On-Site Transformers
51 Underground Storage Tanks
5g Extraction Well Installation
Sh Aquircr Test
SI Sampling and Analysis Plan
5j Reporting
Task Mgmt & QA
WORK ASSIGNMENT TOTALS
• • • Confidential • • •
Prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc.,
for U.S. EPA Contract 68-W9-0057
P4
SI 11.23 "" S6S.08
HRS s HRS
0 0 12
2 222 10
2 222 12
I Ill 6
I 11 I 8
I Ill 88
I Ill 24
I Ill 20
2 222 52
0 0 0
I Ill 4
I 111 2
0 0 0
I Ill 2
I 111 2
0 0 2
I 111 4
2 222 8
I Ill 12
5 556 26
24 2,670 294
1'3 P2 Pl
lh, $48.5 I "" S36.19 "" s HRS s HRS s
781 12 582 0 0
651 ' 0 0 0 0
781 48 2,328 0 0
390 20 970 0 0
521 20 970 0 0
5,727 64 3,105 0 0
1,562 28 1,358 0 0
1,302 30 1,455 0 0
3,384 52 2,523 0 0
0 109 5,288 0 0
260 112 5,433 0 0
130 24 1,164 0 0
0 16 776 0 0
130 12 582 0 0
130 8 388 0 0
130 20 970 0 0
260 108 5,239 0 0
521 40 1,940 12 434
781 96 4,657 0 0
1,692 67 3,250 0 0
19,134 886 42,980 12 434
TABLE 3-2
WESTON DIRECT LABOR & OVERHEAD
TI TOTAL PROF
S39.13 "" LOE
HRS s HRS s
0 0 24 1,363
0 0 12 873
4 157 66 3,488
I 39 28 1,511
0 0 29 1,602
0 0
17 665 170 9,608
0 0 53 3,031
0 0 51 2,868
8 313 114 6,442
110 4,304 219 9,592
0 0 117 5,805
0 0 27 1,406
0 0 16 776
0 0 IS 824
0 0 II 629
0 0 22 1,100
54 2,113 167 7,724
0 0 62 3,118
0 0 109 5,549
0 0 98 5,498
194 7,591 1,410 72,808
S22.26
HRS
I
0
24
12
6
26
16
16
16
8
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
24
20
10
185
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer
Revision: 2
Date: July 02, 1998
Page4of6
C2 TOTAL
"" LABOR
s HRS s
22 25 1,385
0 12 873
534 90 4,023
267 40 1,778
134 35 1,736
0 0
579 196 10,187
356 69 3,388
356 67 3,224
356 130 6,798
178 227 9,770
89 121 5,894
45 29 1,450
0 16 776
0 15 824
0 II 629
0 22 1,100
0 167 7,724
534 86 3,652
445 129 5,994
223 108 5,721
4,118 1,595 76,927
•
•
CAROLINA TRANSFORMER
WBS
Task/ACTIVITY
REMEDIAL DESIGN
I Project Planning
la Data Review
lb Coordination Meetings
le Draft Remedial Design Work Plan
Id Final Remedial Design Work Plan
le RD Data Collection Mgmt.
2 Performance Specification RD
2a Draft Performance Specs.
2b Final Performance Specs.
2c Solicitation Package
3 Technical Support
5 RD Data Collection
Sa Site Clearing
Sb Site Sampling
Sc Asbestos Survey
5d ID\V Drum Sampling
Sc On-Site Transformers
5( Underground Storage Tanks
5g Extraction Well Installation
Sh Aquifer Test
51 Sampling and Analysis Plan
Sj Reporting
Task Mgmt & QA
WORK ASSIGNMENT TOTALS
• • • Confidential • • •
Prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc.,
for U.S. EPA Contract 68-W9-0057
PER DIEM-UM
Faycttc\·illc
$112.00 /day
days s
0 0
0 o,
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 224
16 1,792
21 2,352
2 224
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 224
16 1,792
0 0
0 0
0 0
59 6,608
AUTO
RENTAL CAR MILEAGE
S50.00 /day S0.31 /mile
days
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
6
8
2
0
0
0
2
16
0
0
0
36
Smiles s
0 0 0
0 80 25
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
100 140 43
300 200 62
400 0 0
100 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
100 0 0
800 180 56
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1,800 600 186
TABLE 3-3
TRAVEL EXPENSES
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer
Revision: 2
Date: July 02, 1998
Page 5 of6
TOLLS/ AIRFARE
PARKING Atl-Faycttcvill
Sl2.00 /day $400.00 /1rip
days s trips s
0 0 0 0
I 12 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 24 2 800
0 0 2 800
0 0 3 1,200
0 0 I 400
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 I 400
8 96 3 1,200
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
II 132 12 4,800
TOTAL
TRAVEL
'
0 • 37
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,191
2,954
3,952
724
0
0
0
724
3,944 • 0
0
0
13,526
CAROLINA TRANSFORMER
WBS
Task/ACTIVITY
REMEDIAL DESIGN
I _Project Planning
la Data Review
lb Coordination Meetings
le Draft Remedial Design Work Plan
Id Final Remedial Design Work Plan
le RD Data Collection Mgmt.
2 Performance Specification RD
2a Draft Performance Specs.
2b Final Perfonnance Specs.
2c Solicitation Package
3 T cchnica\ Suppon
5 RD Data Collection
Sa Site Clearing
Sb Site Sampling
Sc Asbestos Sun·ey
Sd JD\V Drum Sampling
Sc On-Site Transformers
Sf Underground S1orage Tanks
Sg Extraction Well Installation
Sh Aquirer Test
Si Sampling and Analysis Plan
Sj H.cporting
Task Mgmt & QA
WORK ASSIGNMENT TOTALS
• • • Confidential • • •
Prepared by Roy F. Weston. Inc.,
for U.S. EPA Contract 68-W9-0057
REPRO./
CAD RENTAL COPYING
SJ5 "" S0.07 /page
h,s s pgs s
0 0 100 7
0 0 0 0
4 60 250 18
I 15 250 18
0 0 200 14
24 360 1,000 70
12 180 300 21
0 0 500 35
6 90 100 7
0 0 l00 7
7 105 200 14
3 45 JOO 7
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 500 35
8 0 500 35
4 60 50 4
69 915 4,150 291
COMPUTER
SS.00 "" hrs s
4 32
0 0
24 192
12 96
IO 80
80 640
20 160
20 160
10 80
10 80
IO 80
5 40
0 0
s 40
0 0
0 0
0 0
IO 80
10 80
45 360
275 2,200
SUBTOTAl
EQUIP. INTERNAL MISC.
RENTAL ODC'S MATERIAU'
s s '
0 39 0
0 ,.o 0
0 270 0
0 129 0
0 94 50
0 1,070 0
0 361 0
0 195 50
0 177 0
0 87 950
1,250 1,449 1,000
25 117 so
0 0 100
3,500 3,540 0
0 0 1,500
0 0 200
800 800 500
0 115 0
0 115 0
0 424 50
5,575 8,981 4,450
TABLE 3-4
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
SUBTOTAL
MAIU EQUIP. IA EXTERNAL
SHIP. TELE. RENTAL KITS ODC'S
s s s s s
0 0 0 0 0
0 5 0 0 5
25 15 0 0 40
25 10 0 0 35
20 0 0 0 70
25 100 0 0 125
25 30 0 0 55
25 20 0 0 95
25 50 0 0 75
2S l00 l,475 0 2,550
ISO 100 0 1,715 2,965
25 20 0 0 95
25 20 0 0 145
25 20 0 0 45
25 50 0 0 1,575
25 25 0 0 250
l00 l00 4,500 0 5,200
so IS 0 0 65
25 20 0 0 45
45 70 0 0 165
690 770 5,975 1,715 13,600
GEOPROBE/
LABOR.ATOR SURVEY
SUBCONTR. SUBCONTR
s s
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 5,000
8,930 3,000
0 0
0 0
0 2,000
0 0
0 4,000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8,930 14,000
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer
Revision: 2
Date; July 02, I 998
Page 6 of6
SUBTOTAL
SUB-TOTAL
CONTRACTS ODC'S
s s
0
0 5
0 310
0 164
0 164
0 1,195
0 416
0 290
0 252
5,000 7,637
11,930 16,3-U
0 212
0 145
2,000 5,585
0 1,575
4,000 4,
0 6,0
0 180
0 160
0 589
22,930 45,511
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
APPENDIX A
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: Appendix A
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
JUNE 22, 1998, LETTER FROM EPA DESCRlBING
AMENDMENT TO THE SOW
NOR/K: \WP\044001073\WPODN001 . DOC 5-1
. 1...:.. I I 0--· I
USEPA \VORI(AS MENTFORi\1
1. WORK ASS!GN'ME~T Th"FOR.'\lA TION
Pr-oject Name: Carolina Transformer work Assignment No.: 73 ·4NC2
Activity: EPA 2ontract Ho.: 58-W9 · 0057 Revision No.:
Contractor: Roy?. Weston, Inc. Modification No.: J,;;)./ _Date: June 22, 1998
'C.0. Use Onlv)
?. DESCR!n!ON OF .~cnox
Pania.l Wod:: Pun .s.----·val,
X Intc:i:m A.rot:."Jldl"Mlll Fin.al Wo:k Pl:a.i1 ... ~rova.l W O':ic: AUi0IDCnt CoCJPl.ction Notificarior.i
Amtndmait 10 Fm..il.l Won'. Pbn A-rov~
l. BUDGET DJFORMA nox -

•

FEES L'K1.L1)ED
!or.rim Bi:dget (l.ll) Approv,::c! Work Plan Budge-1 Exp,,,,miurc Umit (EL)
l'EstlblisJ,..od ..., RPM/RPO)
Cnrrc,,t
·roal Fandms;
R,,.o.,ivol(S)"
PO, 000
•100,000
Tcclw:"'1 r.oe IS)°
0
Tcchnic.1.l LOE Teclloioa! LOE
0 852 s65,298 8,2
2
Total $170,000 0 0 852 S65,298 852 $65,298
4. WA COMPLETIO~· DATE Current: 5/30/96 Revised: 5/30/99
This action ameods tbe SOW (see attached) to add updated and confirmatory groundwater, soil, and debris sampling. The period ofperfonnance ~s also increased,
Coritr?:Ctor Site ~!&nag:x'Dm:
( y l Aw=oi A.> Subwntro
{(\I Approved Wi~ Chsngo.
I l ~otA~""'<d
or;: l. E?APO
• •
Ai'1ENDMENT TO
Remedial Design Statement of Work (SOW) Dated JuJy 1995 Carolillil Transformer Site, Fayetteville, North Carolina.
6/18/98
The purpose of this a.coendment is to modify the existing Remedial Design Statement ofWor.k: (SOW) dated July 1995 (attached) for the C'.arolina Transformer Site in Fayetteville, NC. This amendment gives the contractor one additional task to perform as part of the RD for the Site. The additional task is Task 5 -RD Data Collection. Existing tasks will be modify as descnbed below.
1.0 OBJECTIVE-See original SOW
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION -See original SOW
3.0 SITE HISTORY -See original SOW
4.0 RECOlll OF DECISION -Sec qrig:inal SOW
5.0 REMEDIAL DESIGN SCOPE OF ·woRK
The RD scope of work for the design of groundwater remediation system contains the following tasks (tasks requiring changes appear on italics)
TASK 1 -Project planing
TASK 2 -Preparation of Performsnce design and So!icitaiioa Package . I TASK 3 -Technical Support , ·
TASK 4-i'VorkAssignmentManagement
TASK 5 -RD Data Collection
TASK -1 ProjP.ct Planning
Data rE,View -Not applicable (NA)
Pre-design coordination mreting -NA
Prepare Draft and Final work plan
nie contractor shall prepare an addendum to the existing work plan in order to incorporate the new add&1 task (TASK5), and any orher tasks affected. The contractor sha![ submit a draft addendum to the existing 11-0rk plan for EPA review and co1r.»zents. After receiving comments from EPA, the contractor sha![ ir.co1porate the comments and a final version of the addendwn ¾-Ork plan shall be submitted. The addendum shall include a derailed cost estimare as specified in the original SOW.
~ The contractor shall prepare and submit a Sampling an Analysis Pian (SAP) as pan of the -wrk plan. The SAP shall include a Quality Assurance Projea Plan, Field Sampling Plan and Data· -
• kfanagement Plan.
Deliverables
Draft Addendum Work plan (including S.4PJ(3 copies) Final Addendwn Work plan (including SAP)(] copies)
•
5.2 TASK 2 -Performance Specification DeSign and Solicitation Package -Not Applicable
5.3 TASK 3 -Technical Support -Not applicable
5.4 TASK 4 -Work Assignment Management -As appropriate
5.5 TASK 5 -RD Data Collu'tWn Under this task the Contraczor shall collect !he information specified below in order to cover RD data gaps necessary for the development of tlze solicitation package.
5.5.1 Clearing Site VegetaJit.m
The contractor shall clear site vegetation in order to uncovered any hidden waste. The contractor shall dispose of clewed vegetation off-site. After the site is cleared of vegeration, tlu! contractor shall ensure that all waste and debris on-site are identify. If additional type of waste or debris are discovered (not addressed in this SOW) the contractor shall bring the issue to !he attention of the RPM The contractor shall ensure that all waste is cJ..aracterized for the purpose of disposal before the end of this "data gaps investigation".
5.5.2 Groundwater
5.5.2.l Groundwaur samples -. The contracwr shall coilect low flow groW1dwater samples from all existing monizoring wells in order UJ evaluate potential mezals and PCB contamination.
5.5.23 Existing wells -The contractor shall determine the construction and pumping capacities of nearby water supply-wells located in the upper aquifer. The comracror shall use this information to better determine potential pumping rates for the pump and · treat system.
5.5.2.4 Pump test -After receiiing the analytical results of the groundwater samples, d1e contracror shall install an extraction well and conduct an aquifer pumping test. Prior to perform this task, the contraczor shall discuss the analyrical ,-,;:sult.s of !he groundwater samples ¼ith the RPM.
5.5.3 Soll samples
The contractor shall collect and analyze soil or sedimem samples (as indicated below) from the following areas:
• • Soil beneath concrete (inside and outside)
Deeper soil -locations where the deeper soil sampled during the RI contained PCB at concenrrations of 25 mg/kg or grater.
Sedim.ent -drainage ditch downstream of the previous sampling locations and in the dilch r1ear the eastern gate.
5. 5.4 Waste and Debris Clzaracterwitian.
The conrractor shall collect and analyze sampfes from the following waste:
Debris -such as pallets, drums/cans and pieces of electrical hardware in order to characterize waste and determine appropriate disposal during the RA.
Concrete foundations and slabs-building foundations {l)ld slabs outside the building in order to determine appropriate disposal during the RA.
5.5.5 TMks and Transformers
The contractor shall remove and drum liquids from all tanks GJtd transfonners on site. The conrractor shall sample and analyze the liquids to determined appropriate disposal dun·ng the RA.
5. 5. 6 AsbestlJs
The contractor shall perform an asbestos ~ey of the main building in order to determine potential presazce of asbestos in th.e building. The contractor shall collect and analyze samples of materials that could potentially-contabz asbestos in order ro address potential concerns during demolition of the buildings.
5.5.7 Drums
The contractor shall classif;, sample and analyr..e contents of drums stored in the main building in order to detennine appropriate disposal during the RA ..
5. 5. 6 Area Survey
The conrractor shall perfonn a survey to determine sire dtmensions.
6.0 SCHEDULE
The contractor shall develop a schedule for completion of the new modified tasks. The contractor and EPA will negotiate delivery date for the draft and final addendum work plan during scoping call.
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. lt shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
APPENDIX B
SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
NORIK:\WP\04400\073\WPDON001. DOC 5-1
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: Appendix B
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
ID Task Name
1 Submittal of Revision 1 Work
Plan
2 Approval of Revision 1 Work
Plan
3 RD Data Collection Field
Activities
4 Receipt of Analytical Data
5 Submittal -Revision ORO
Data Collection Report
6 Submittal -Revision 1
Groundwater Remedial
Action Solicitation Package
7 Comments on RD Data
Collection Report
8 Comments on Groundwater
RA Solicitation Package
9 Final RD Data Collection
Report
10 Final Groundwater RA
Solicitation Package
Project: Carolina Transformer Site
Date: Wed 7/1/98
Wed 7/1/98
28, '98
w T F
~
Task
Progress
Milestone
s
Schedule of Activities
Groundwater Solicitation Package
Carolina Transformer Site -Fayetteville, North Carolina
Jul 5, '98 Jul 12, '98 Jut 19, '98 Jul 26, '98
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T
♦
Summary
Rolled Up Task •
Rolled Up Milestone 0
Page 1
• Rolled Up Progress
Aug 2, '98
F S S M T W T F S
Aug 9, '98
S M T W T
Project: Carolina Transformer Site
Date: Wed 7/1/98
Wed 7/1/98
Schedule of Activities
Groundwater Solicitation Package
Carolina Transformer Site -Fayetteville, North Carolina
Aug 16, '98 Aug 23, '98 Aug 30, '98 Sep 6, '98 Sep 13, '98 Sep 20, '98
T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
Task
Progress
Milestone
II
♦
Summary
Rolled Up Task •
Rolled Up Milestone 0
Page 2
Q Rolled Up Progress
Schedule of Activities
Groundwater Solicitation Package
Carolina Transformer Site -Fayetteville, North Carolina
Sep 27, '98 Oct 4, '98 Oct 11, '98 Oct 18, '98 Oct 25, '98 Nov 1, '98 Nov 8, '98
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
Project: Carolina Transformer Site
Date: Wed 7/1/98
Wed 7/1/98
Task
Progress
Milestone ♦
Summary • Q Rolled Up Progress
Rolled Up Task
Rolled Up Milestone 0
Page 3
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
APPENDIX C
RESUMES
NOR/K:IWP\04400\0731WP00N001.DOC 5-1
Work Plan
Carolina Transformer Site
Section: Appendix C
Revision: 1
Date: July 1998
=======!•~======='•~=====
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
WILLIAM R. DOYLE
Registration
Registered Sanitarian in the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Fields of Competence
Management of large, dedicated environmental contracts; ambient air monitoring and sampling;
soil and waste sampling; groundwater, surface water, wastewater, and stom1water sampling and
water quality data analysis; critical-phase emergency response operations; Spill Prevention Control
and Countermeasures (SPCC) plans; hazardous waste management plans; large-scale hazardous
waste site remediation; storage tank management;federal, state and local government operations;
technical writing.
Experience Summary
Fourteen years of experience in the life sciences/environmental field, more than 10 years of
which were in site safety, environmental emergency response, and protection of public
health, including the management of large, dedicated hazardous materials emergency
response contracts involving 14 states.
Four years of experience in domestic/industrial wastewater treatment plant inspection and
enforcement at the local government level, including plant operations, effluent and
receiving stream sampling, and data interpretation as it relates to in-plant operational
parameters.
Performed dozens of responses to releases involving oil and hazardous materials.
Experienced in the requirements of 40 CFR 112 and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and how
they relate to oil storage facilities.
Design and execution of stormwater sampling plans, National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permitting, sample collection, and data review.
Preparation of specifications and cost estimates, review of work plan and safety plans, field
supervision, and auditing.
Real-time ambient air monitoring instrumentation, groundwater well installation and
sampling equipment, various geophysical survey instrumentation, personal protective
equipment (PPE), and numerous software packages.
Six years of experience in exotic aninlal husbandry and behavioral research.
NOR/J:\BJOS\OOYLE/1 3/98
======~•~=======•~=====
Credentials
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
WILLIAM R. DOYLE
{continued)
M.S., Biology -University of Louisville (1983)
B.A., Biology (Honors) -University of Louisville (1977)
Kenn1cky Wildlife Rescue and Release Association, Director (1978-1982)
Employment History
1988-Present
1987-1988
1983-1987
1981-1983
1975-1981
Key Projects
WESTON
GEO/Resource Consultants
Jefferson County (Kentucky)
Graduate Studies
Louisville Zoological Garden
Alternative Remedial Contracts Strategy (ARCS), Various Locations, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV, Program Manager. Responsible for the management of a
large, multisite contract with the :Remedial Branch of EPA. Site work under this contract includes
review of remediation work plans, site investigations, ecological and health risk assessments,
community relations, remedial design, and oversight of remedial actions for sites contaminated with
oil/hazardous material. Contract currently involves more than 50 assignments in the 8 states
comprising the southeastern United States.
Hazardous Waste Management Plan, South Carolina, Shaw Air Force Base, Project
Manager. As a subcontractor to Parsons Engineering Science on an Air Combat Command
environmental contract, revised the existing Hazardous Waste Management Plan (HWMP) for this
base located in central South Carolina. The project involved a site visit to determine waste
management practices and using the information gained to perform a time critical rewrite of the
HWMP. The revised HWMP was in accordance with appropriate federal and state requirements
and was in compliance with other base documents, such as the Spill Prevention Plan and Hazardous
Waste Analysis Plan.
Tank Removal Site Characterization In Remediation, South Carolina, Charleston Air Force
Base Resource Manager
Emergency Response Operations (TAT), Various Locations, EPA Region IV, EPA, Project
Officer. Perfom1ed emergency response work on a 24-hour-per-day, 7-day-per-week basis for the
EPA Region IV Emergency Response and Removal Branch while living in Louisville, KY, and
Memphis, TN. The nature of the emergency responses included transportation incidents, discovery
~-
NOR/J:\BlOS\OOYLE/2 3198
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Key Projects (continued)
WILLIAM R. DOYLE
( continued)
of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites, oil spills, and air releases. Responsibilities included the
quick preparation of a comprehensive safety plan, rapid deployment to the site, providing
documentation and technical assistance to EPA and local response groups, emergency containment
of hazardous materials or oil, when required, ensuring that the mitigation effort by responsible
parties was in accordance with good engineering practices, and the timely completion of quality,
detailed deliverables.
Onshore Oil Pipeline Spill Response Plan, Macon, GA, Norfolk Southern Railroad, Project
Manager. Preparation of a Spill Response Plan for a 5-mile pipeline used to transport diesel fuels.
Plan was prepared to meet the criteria required by U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)
under 49 CFR 194 and 195. Plan detailed spill prevention procedures, potentially affected streams
and wetlands, and operational activities that complied with the engineering standards established by
ASME B31 .4/4a. Plan was reviewed and approved by DOT (as required) and placed into service.
SPCC Plan, Various Locations, Norfolk Southern Railroad, Project Manager. This project
involved the systemwide update of SPCC plans, encompassing more than 100 facilities in 16 states.
The fast-tracked project required coordinating the activities of 15 registered professional engineers
who scheduled and performed visits to the sites, determined the need for SPCC plans based on
storage capacity and ongoing site activities, and prepared plans for those sites where they were
required. The SPCC plans prepared by the engineers were consistent with the requirements of 40
CFR 112 and Norfolk Southern's internal policies and procedures.
Technical Assistance Team (TAT), Atlanta, GA, EPA Region IV, Regional Manager.
Managed a team of 46 professional scientists of mixed disciplines who performed under a dedicated
contract to respond to spills and incidents involving hazardous materials in the eight states
comprising EPA Region IV. Responsibilities included oversight of crews performing site
investigations (Sis); emergency removal operations; emergency spill response; recommendation of
removal technologies; scheduling, budgeting, and staffing of more than 250 projects per year; and
ensuring the timely completion of client deliverables.
Stormwater Sampling and NPDES Permitting, Georgia, City of Atlanta, Project Manager.
As part of a national contract with an association of municipalities, managed a storm water sampling
and NPDES permitting project in Atlanta, GA. The scope of the task involved detailed preplanning
and coordination of activities with city engineers and rapid response to ensure valid data collection
during an appropriate rain event. Following the field portion of the project, all forms required for
NPDES permitting were completed.
Stream Study Program, Kentucky, Jefferson County, Project Scientist. As part of an overall
water quality monitoring and enforcement ro ram b the County Department of Public Health,
NOR/J:\BlOS\DOYLE/3 3198
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Key Projects (continued)
WILLIAM R. DOYLE
(continued)
routinely collected samples of water from the three largest watersheds in the metropolitan area.
The analyses of these samples, which were collected from the entire length of the stream, were
routinely reviewed for anomalous bacterial counts, physical characteristics, or chemical
constituents. Any results that were found to be outside of the established norms were cause for the
initiation of source investigations. Additionally, investigated fish kills associated with any body of
water within the County, identifying species diversity involved and the potential source of the
incident.
Stream Monitoring and Analysis Program (SMAP), Kentucky, Jefferson County, Project
Scientist. While employed in the Water Resources Section of the Environmental Health Division
of the Jefferson County Health Department, ran I-year-long special contract to assess the water
quality of seven watersheds in the County. Physical and chemical data were collected and used to
establish the watershed ranking by stream quality and to identify the source pollution (i.e., animal,
human, organic, or inorganic). All findings were delivered to the Water Quality Advisory Board
for inclusion in an areawide sewerage plan.
Safety Plan Review and OSHA Requirements, Georgia, WESTON, Regional Safety Officer,
Southeastern Region. As a senior project manager, familiar with OSHA requirements for
hazardous waste site operations, responsible for safety plan review, staff training and medical
monitoring programs, and compliance with hazardous materials shipping regulations. Additional
responsibilities include developing and implementing an ongoing OSHA/WESTON-required plans
such as a Respiratory Protection Plan, Hazard Communications Plan, Fleet Safety, and others.
TAT, Chicago, IL, EPA Region V, Regional Manager. Managed a team of 52 professional
scientists of mixed disciplines who performed under a dedicated contract to respond to spills and
incidents involving hazardous materials in the six states comprising EPA Region V.
Responsibilities included oversight of crews performing Sls; emergency removal operations;
emergency spill response; recommendation of removal technologies; scheduling, budgeting, and
staffing of more than 200 projects per year; and ensuring the timely completion of client
deliverables.
Emergency Capping and Containment. Operation, Kentucky, EPA/TAT, Project Officer.
Performed as removal contractor monitor. Documented daily costs, performed multimedia
sampling, and acted as Site Safety Officer (SSO) and liaison between EPA and state officials during
the National Priorities List (NPL) delisting operation at the Valley of the Drums site in Bullitt
County, KY.
First Responder Training, EPA Region IV, EPA/TAT, Instructor. Assisted in the preparation
and delivery of several 24-hour health and safet classes for firefighters, state officials, and federal
NOR/J:\BIOS\OOYLE/4 3/90
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Key Projects (continued)
WILLIAM R. DOYLE
(continued)
responders that covered the basics of hazardous materials response operations. Areas of concern
included site safety, basic chemistry, toxicology, the proper use of PPE, real-time ambient air
monitoring, and multimedia sampling.
Hazardous Materials Response Simulation (TAT), Louisville, KY, and Spartanburg, SC,
EPA, Project Officer. Designed and executed two large hazardous materials response simulations
that involved the combined efforts of numerous federal, state, and local response agencies and 200
participants. Responsibilities included design of the scenario; coordination of needed resources,
planning, and logistics; completion of detailed weekly reports; oversight of the event; participation
in a critique; and completion of final deliverable reports.
Publications and Presentations
Powell, G., R. Doyle, and K. Burch. 1989. "Bullitt County, Kentucky, Rapid Assessment of
Area Groundwater Contamination." HAZTECH International 4th Annual Exhibition and
Conference, Cincinnati, OH.
,.
Doyle, W.R. 1980. "Five-Year Study of Gray Seal Reproduction at the Louisville Zoological
Garden." International Association for Aquatic Animal Medicine, I Ith Annual Conference and
Workshop, Vancouver, BC.
NORJJ:\8105\DOYLE/6 3/118
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
DAVID D. NELSON, P.G.
Registration
Professional Geologist (PG) in the States of Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and
Tennessee
Fields of Competence
Geology: Strong background in many areas of the science, including sedimentation,
sedimentology, geophysics, paleontology, surface processes, structural geology, stratigraphy,
field techniques and applications, and geologic mapping.
Hydrogeology: Characterization of groundwater aquifers; groundwater modeling; hazardous
waste site management; knowledge of geochemistry of aquifers and contaminant profiling;
well design and installation; geophysics as related to aquifers; hydrogeologic testing of
aquifers; and design and implementation of groundwater monitoring and extraction systems.
Site Assessments: Municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill hydrogeologic investigations;
underground storage tank (UST) site investigations (Sis); planning and implementation of
Corrective Action Plans (CAPs); historical reviews of past usage; and execution of all
program phases and report writ_ing.
,·
Data Management: Compilation and processing of analytical, geological, geochemical,
historical data as related to site; installation of data onto programs including Maplnfo,
ACAD, IRPMS, Arclnfo, and other modeling programs; processing of data using Excel to
produce tables, maps, graphs, 3-dimensional figures.
Experience Summary
• Eight years experience in hazardous waste investigations and management for private
industry and government facilities, including Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) facility assessments and remedial investigations/feasibility studies
(RI/FS) under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act of 1980 (Superfund) (CERCLA).
• Site Manager and Project Manager for numerous RI activities involving industrial
clients, Department of Defense (DOD), Alternative Remedial Contracts Strategy
(ARCS), and UST sites with known or preliminary data indicating presence of
hazardous materials. Responsible for contracting, budget control, and project
development and completion.
• Lead Hydrogeologist and Project Geologist for solid waste landfill investigations, site
suitability studies, and groundwater monitoring plan installations.
NOR:V:\BIOS\NELSON/1 rl}/97
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
DAVID D. NELSON, P.G.
( continued)
Experience Summary (Continued)
• Conducted site inspections, preliminary assessments, and RI/FS for industrial
facilities throughout the Southeast. Responsible for design and implementation,
oversight and review of remedial system installation.
• Vast knowledge and experience of environmental site investigations utilizing various
geologic and geophysical techniques, including various types of drilling, surface and
subsurface sampling, monitor well installations, soil gas surveys, electromagnetic and
seismic surveying, and stream profiling in an effort to track and define potential
contamination of various media.
Credentials
M.S., Geology -University of Georgia (1989)
B.S., Geology -Guilford College (1985)
S.E.P.M. -Society for Sedimentary Geology
National Water Well Association
Georgia Water and Pollution Control Association
Employment History
1992-Present WESTON
1990-1992 Westinghouse Environmental and Geotechnical Services, Inc.
1985-1989 Wilcox Oil and Gas Exploration, Inc.
Key Projects
Superfund Sites, Various Locations, U.S. EPA Region IV, Work Assignment Manager.
Project/Work Assignment Manager for 12 Superfund sites within five southeastern U.S.
states. Responsible for contracting, work plan development and implementation, document
development, heath and safety issues, project budget, site management, and project
completion. Maintain excellent rapport with EPA Remedial Project Managers to ensure
project development and completion as well as total client satisfaction.
Emergency Response, Groundwater and Soil Investigation, Tennessee, Norfolk Southern
Railway Corporation, Site Manager. Responsible for coordination and implementation of site
related tasks under emergency response action. Activities included coordination between client,
landowner, emergency response consultant, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and
State of Tennessee while implementing soil sampling and groundwater sampling of existing
monitor wells on a RCRA facility. Also coordinated effort to complete confirmatory soil
NOR:V:\B!OS\NELSON/2 09197
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Key Projects (continued)
DAVID D. NELSON, P.G.
(continued)
sampling event utilizing sampling teams and on-site laboratory under expedited conditions.
Completed both efforts before or on time expected by client.
RI/FS, North Carolina, Confidential Client, Hydrogeologist. Investigation into vertical and
horizontal extent of semivolatile and volatile organic contaminants (SVOCs/VOCs) in soil and
groundwater emanating from a former landfill area, wastewater treatment ponds, and chemical
sewers. Investigation methods included soil-gas surveys, geophysical mapping, soil sampling,
HydroPunch investigations, sludge sampling, shallow and deep monitor well installation,
groundwater sampling, and aquifer testing.
RI, Jacksonville, NC, U.S. EPA Region IV, Project Hydrogeologist. Site Manager of a
project team investigating solvent contamination of soil and groundwater in an highly urbanized
area. Developed field procedures for other project team members and subcontractors to
maintain. Obtained permits for right-of-way work from the City of Jacksonville, private
landowners, and the United States Marine Corps (USMC). Managed investigation using monitor
wells, soil sampling, groundwater sampling, and soil vapor extraction (SVE). Completed entire
RI documentfor site study.
Hydrogeologic and Geophysical Assessment for MSW Landfills, Various Locations, State
of Georgia, Project Geologist. Responsible for designing and implementing soil borings,
monitor wells, and piezometers on active and proposed landfill expansion areas. Conducted
geophysical investigations across proposed expansion area for determination of site suitability.
In addition, responsible for hydrogeologic testing of site aquifers for determination of properties.
Prepared technical reports on work conducted leading to acceptance of site by the state.
UST Investigations, Numerous Sites, Multiple Clients, Project Hydrogeologist. Project
designer responsible for implementation of UST investigations, including proposal phase, initial
site survey sampling, installation of soil borings, HydroPunch investigations, soil-gas vapor
investigations, quarterly monitoring, monitor and extraction well installation and sampling,
writing of CAPs, creation of plume maps, and regulatory agency contact. Acted as mediator
between client and state on extremely sensitive sites. Project Geologist for several GUST sites.
The sites were located in very diverse geologic settings, including Piedmont, Valley and Ridge,
and Coastal Plains.
RCRA Facility Assessments (RFAs), Marietta, GA, Confidential Client, Project Manager.
Evaluation of several potential Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) through soil sampling
and subsequent analysis. Completion of reports detailing efforts, as well as client and state
regulatory contact, leading to acceptance of sites as nonregulated.
NOR:V:\810S\NELSON/3 09/97
======~•~=======•
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Key Projects (continued)
DAVID D. NELSON, P.G.
(continued)
RI, Plymouth, NC, Weyerhauser Corp., Project Geologist. Design and implementation of
soil and concrete sampling for mercury and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination from
a fonner paper processing plant. Sampled more than 100 locations, collecting over 200 samples
for immediate processing by on-site laboratory, which provided information and additional
sampling locations. Completed study using technical health and safety equipment and guidelines.
Groundwater Modeling, Jacksonville, NC, EPA, Hydrogeologist. Using data collected during
the RI, modeled groundwater system underlying site as part of remedial design (RD). Models
included Flowpath and Quickflow, and involved designing an extraction well network of either
horizontal and/or vertical monitor wells.
NOR:U:\810S\NELSON/4 09197
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
BRIAN R. MAGEE, P.E.
Registration
Registered Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of Georgia
Fields of Competence
Environmental engineering and environmental toxicology; groundwater and soil remedial design
and remediation; hazardous waste site assessment; physical-chemical aspects of contaminant
transport; development of cleanup criteria; statistical methods for assessing site contamination.
Experience Summary
•
•
•
Ten years of hazardous waste site assessment and cleanup experience .
Engineering studies for contaminated soil and groundwater remediation .
Design of groundwater remediation systems .
• Preliminary assessments, site inspections, and remedial investigations of potential
hazardous waste sites.
,· • Remediation of sites containing hazardous or mixed hazardous/radioactive waste .
• Risk assessments and development of cleanup goals for contaminated groundwater and
soil.
• Contaminant fate and transport analysis .
Credentials
M.S., Environmental Toxicology -Cornell University (1988)
B.S., Environmental Engineering -Pennsylvania State University (1983)
40-Hour Health and Safety Training
Employment History
I 988-Present
1984-1986
I 983-1984
NOA/J:\8I0S\MAGEE/1
WESTON
E.C. Jordan Consulting Engineers and Scientists
Tighe and Bond Consulting Engineers
11/96
Key Projects
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
BRIAN R. MAGEE, P.E.
(Continued)
Remedial Design of Remediation System for Contaminated Groundwater Plume, Americus,
GA, Project Manager. Designed a groundwater extraction and treatment system to remediate
groundwater contaminated by methyl ethyl ketone and toluene from paint wastes from a wood
molding manufacturer. The treatment system consists of carbon adsorption and pH adjustment.
Remedial Design of Groundwater Extraction and Treatment System, EPA, ARCS, North
Carolina Superfund Site, Project Manager. Developed innovative performance-based
approach for design specifications for a remediation system to extract and treat groundwater
contaminated with tetrachloroethylene and other chlorinated solvents released from a dry
cleaning establishment. The system will treat several thousand gallons per minute via air
stripping with discharge to surface water.
Combination RI/FS and Base Closure Evaluation for a U.S. Army Installation,
USATHAMA, Watertown, MA, Task Manager. Tackled unique problems associated with the
closure of the two-century-old U.S. Army Materials Technology Laboratory. Developed a
unique indoor contamination assessment program for two dozen buildings that were used for
ballistics testing, materials research (including the use of depleted uranium and beryllium), and
metal plating. The RI/FS also included characterization of contamination in the soil,
groundwater, containers, sewers, and the Charles River. Coordinated schedules for field staff
of 20. Because indoor standards were unavailable, devised innovative procedure for calculating
appropriate guidelines for surface contamination using protocol from another state. Developed
a mixed waste management plan based on emerging cleanup technologies and new regulatory
requirements. Evaluated regulations to determine hazardous waste classifications and disposal
restrictions for a variety of waste materials. Coordinated public involvement through Fact
Sheets and several public meetings throughout the project. Based on our performance,
WESTON was awarded six contract additions and one new task order on the project, so that the
total contract amount is approximately $6 million. Furthermore, due to WESTON's
performance, the installation has contracted WESTON directly to oversee the radiological
remediation work of several other contractors.
RI/FS, Ohio, Confidential Client, Chemical Manufacturing Site, Project Engineer.
Conducted an RI/FS for a site that contained extensive polychlorinated dibenzodioxin and
chlorinated-benzene contamination in soil and groundwater. Coordinated a phased sampling
program to determine the extent of coniamination and to develop remedial alternatives for the
site. Proposed a series of partitioning experiments to better describe the potential for migration
of the contaminants from soil to water to allow the development of soil cleanup criteria.
Developed unsaturated zone model to predict potential leaching of contaminants under various
capping scenarios.
NOA/J:\BIOS\MAGEE/2 11 /96
======='•~=====~•
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Key Projects (Continued}
BRIAN R. MAGEE, P.E.
(Continued)
Groundwater and Soil Treatment Feasibility Study, Superfund Site, New Jersey, Project
Engineer. Proposed an innovative bioflushing remedial alternative. To avoid the costly
excavation of contaminated soil covering several acres and depths of up to 12 ft, the system
involves the extraction, biological treatment, and recirculation of contaminated groundwater.
Designed a treatability program to determine the effectiveness of bioremediation on the major
contaminant, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate. A floating product recovery system installed by a
previous consultant was upgraded to increase recovery more than JO-fold. Supervised the work
of two engineering professionals on this project. Summarized treatment and disposal options
based on Land Disposal Restrictions under RCRA and surface water discharge requirements
under the Clean Water Act. Developed an inventive contaminant leaching/adsorption/dilution
model to justify a soil cleanup goal for antimony to protect groundwater, which was accepted
without comment by New Jersey DEPE. WESTON received letter of appreciation from client
for the high-quality work.
Site Assessment and Remedial Investigation, Yorktown Naval Weapons Station, Virginia,
Project Engineer. As part of the Navy CLEAN program, responsible for site assessment of
a disposal area that contained discarded batteries, drums, and miscellaneous debris and an
assessment including the collection of soil and groundwater samples. Developed a work plan
to investigate contamination at 16 other sites covering a large portion of the NWS. Responsible
for the oversight of project engineers and geologists. In several areas, due to the presence of
old mines and other explosives, unique investigative approaches were required. In addition to
the standard analyte list, explosives and their breakdown products were investigated in soil,
groundwater, surface water, and sediment samples.
Project Engineer for Confidential Client Site with PAR-Contaminated Soil and
Groundwater, Gainesville, Florida. Provided project performance oversight and direction for
the cleanup of a pine tar contaminated site. Groundwater is to be collected via an underdrain
trench placed beneath a surface drainage ditch. Evaluated treatment options for phenol removal.
Developed cleanup goals for soil based on direct soil exposure and contaminant leaching to
groundwater. Lead engineer for ongoing remedial design to reduce phenol concentration in
collected groundwater prior to discharge to sewer. The groundwater treatment system will
consist of chemical oxidation using hydrogen peroxide.
RI/FS at High Point Landfill, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Project
Engineer. Responsibilities included the evaluation and screening of treatment technologies for
contaminated groundwater, surface water, sediment, and air; the development of remedial
alternatives; and investigation and evaluation of site background infonnation.
FS, EPA ARCS, North Carolina Superfund Site, Project Engineer. The feasibility study
evaluated soil remediation options, with and without building removal, at an active dry cleaning
NOR/J:\810S\MAGEE/3 11/96
======~• I
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Key Projects {Continued)
BRIAN R. MAGEE, P.E.
{Continued)
facility. The remedial design involves the extraction of volatile contaminants in soil around and
beneath a building, following a pilot study to optimize the extraction system. Soil vapor
extraction was the most cost-effective alternative.
Conceptual Design of an Aboveground and an In Situ Bioremediation System, Philadelphia,
PA, Confidential Client, Project Engineer. Included soil contaminated with petroleum
hydrocarbons and other organic contaminants. The systems, designed to operate under limited
space, included recirculation of water, a piping network for the leaching of water above the soil,
and a collection layer with piping beneath the soil.
Groundwater Treatment System, Truck Leasing Facility, Georgia, Project Engineer. Fast-
tracked technology selection and design for a treatment system for groundwater contaminated
with chlorinated solvents. Rather than selecting the "standard" air stripper design, conducted
long-term cost-benefit analysis between column air stripper (with higher capital cost) and tray
aerator (with higher air treatment O&M costs using carbon adsorption). Evaluated a unique
"post stripper blower" design layout. Selected the most cost-effective alternative for the
anticipated period of performance.
Chemical Dechlorination Treafability Study, New Jersey, Myers Property Site. Developed
a test plan and final report describing the procedures and results for a treatability study to
evaluate a chemical dechlorination process. This treatment process was conducted on soils from
a Superfund site containing DDT, its metabolites, and other chlorinated-organic compounds.
Developed Excavation Procedures and Soil Cover Design, Pennsylvania Superfund Site,
Project Engineer. Organized testing, excavation, and disposal of contaminated soil (hazardous
waste). Developed two soil cover designs: one containing clay for installation over
contaminated areas, and one consisting of topsoil for the remainder of the site.
Assessed Contamination and Preliminary Remedial Alternatives, Utah, Tooele Army Depot,
North and South Area, USATHAMA, Project Engineer. Determined sources of soil and
groundwater contaminants and assessed whether each chemical came from natural sources.
Recommended cleanup measures for leakage from a chemical treatment plant, a leaking oil tank
and surrounding soil, and a facility thaUreats and/or removes explosives from shells.
Endangerment Assessments, Various U.S. Army Installations, USATHAMA, Risk
Assessment QA Coordinator. Responsible for oversight of endangennent assessments
conducted at several Army installations, including Fort Polk, Louisiana; Riverbank Army
Ammunition Plant, California; and Tooele Army Depot, north and south areas. Also responsible
for the contamination assessment in the Fort Polk RI.
NOR/J:\810S\MAGEE/4 11 /98
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Key Projects (Continued}
BRIAN R. MAGEE, P.E.
(Continued}
Remedial Measures for Dioxin-Containing Lagoon, New Jersey, Confidential Client, Project
Engineer. Designed interim remedial measures for a dioxin-containing lagoon and surrounding
soil area at an chemical plant. Also designed measures to address employee exposure to
chromium-contaminated fill at the site.
Remedial Alternatives to Address Volatile Organics/PCB Contamination, Pennsylvania,
Confidential Client, Engineer. Identified and evaluated a comprehensive list of remedial
alternatives to address contamination by volatile organics and PCBs in groundwater, fractured
bedrock, and overburden soil. Responsible for evaluating collection, containment, and disposal
technologies for the contaminated groundwater.
Evaluation of Impacts from the Proposed Groundwater Remediation at the Tooele Army
Depot, North Area, for USACE, Huntsville Division, Task Manager. Developed an
environmental assessment (EA) including hazard/risk evaluation, for the construction and
operation of a 36-billion-gallon groundwater remediation program to remove trichloroethylene
(TCE). A pilot-scale treatment system was installed to optimize operating parameters for the
full-scale system.
Preliminary Assessment, California, Sacramento Army Depot, USATHAMA, Project
Engineer. Conducted an enhanced preliminary assessment at the Sacramento Army Depot in
preparation for base closure. Researched files and conducted interviews on site history and
status. Following a 4-day site visit, reported on areas under investigation and recommended
sampling in other sections of the installation.
Design of Landfill Cap and Closure, Winthrop, ME, United Technologies Corp., Engineer.
Supervised a test pitting program to excavate buried drums and other waste m·aterial from the
Winthrop Landfill Superfund site. Designed a low-permeability clay cap and drainage system
for final closure of the site. Developed health-based preliminary alternate concentration limits
for groundwater at the site, setting standards for dozens of organic contaminants above which
extensive remedial action would be triggered.
Site Assessment and Remedial Alternatives Analysis, Paint Factory Site, Fort Lauderdale,
FL, Florida Department of Transportation, Engineer. Designed and performed sampling and
proposed cleanup levels to allow highway construction at the site for lead and mercury in soil
and sediment and on structural surfaces. Developed measures to remove contamination from
concrete surfaces.
Pollution Abatement Confirmation Study, Brunswick Naval Air Station, Maine, U.S. Navy,
Engineer. Characterized extent of organic and inorganic contamination in soil, groundwater,
NOR/J:\810S\MAGEE/5 11/96
=======!•~=====~•~=====
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Key Projects (Continued)
BRIAN R. MAGEE, P.E.
(Continued)
surface water, and sediment. The investigation included sampling and evaluation of five
disposal site on the evaluation. Recommended alternatives for further action.
Waste Analysis Plan, Burlington, VT, Vermont Department of Transportation, Engineer.
Plan governed the handling of contaminated soils to be excavated during bridge construction at
a coal tar site in Vermont. Determined cleanup goals based on partitioning coefficients and
projected migration of contaminants.
Preliminary Assessments/Site Inspections, Various Locations, Florida, Florida Department
of Environmental Regulation, Engineer. Conducted and reported on approximately 60
preliminary assessments and 25 site inspections to identify sites which might warrant further
study under the hazard ranking system. Inspections covered a wide range of industries,
including metal-plating operations, paint manufacturers, plastics manufacturers, food processors,
electronics manufacturers, and operating and abandoned landfills.
Health and Safety Plan, Bethany Township, !\fl, Municipal Landfill, Project Director.
Prepared a health and safety plan covering site workers and local residents during the installation
of a contaminated groundwater purge system at a municipal landfill. ,·
Remedial Alternatives Evaluation, Various Locations, Various Clients, Project Director.
Evaluated remedial alternatives at industrial waste dump sites for the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources and for an electronics manufacturer in Vermont.
Sampling Plans Development, Various Locations, Various Clients, Project Director.
Developed sampling plans to determine the extent of contamination at a military installation in
Cape Cod, MA for the U.S. Department of Defense, and at a site containing lead paint chips
in Connecticut.
Publications
Magee, B.R., Lion, L. W., and Lemley, A. T. "The Transport of Dissolved Organic
Macromolecules and Their Effect on the Transport of Phenanthrene in Porous Media." Environ.
Sci. and Technol. Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 323-331, February 1991.
Magee, B.R., Milicic, E., Motwani, J.N., and Sarkar, A. "The Treatment of Soils Containing
DDT and Related Compounds Using Dechlorination." Presented at the AICHE Summer
National Meeting, "Environment, Energy and Safety: Challenges, Opportunities, Solutions."
August 19-22, 1990.
NOA/J:\BIOS\MAGEE/6 11/96
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Publications (Continued)
BRIAN R. MAGEE, P.E.
(Continued)
Magee, B.R., Schuyler, S.E., and Kufs, C. T. "The Use of Background Concentrations in Site
Assessments." Proceedings of the 1990 National Water Well Association Cluster of
Conferences, Environmental Site Assessments: Case Studies and Strategies, Kansas City, MO,
February 20-21, 1990.
Magee, B.R., Lemley, A.T., and Lion, L.W. "The Effect of Water-Soluble Organic Materials
on the Transport of Phenanthrene in Sand Columns." Presented at the Third Conference on En-
vironmental and Public Health Effects of Soils Contaminated with Petroleum Products, Amherst,
MA, September 19-21, 1988.
Magee, B.R., Shimko, R., Breland, P., "Mixed Waste Management During Decommissioning
at a DOD Depleted Uranium-Contaminated Facility." Presented at "Waste Management '93",
Tucson, Arizona.
NOR/J:\810$\MAGEE/7 11/96
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
RALPH P. McKEEN, P.E.
Registration
Registered Professional Engineer in the States of New Mexico, West Virginia, and Georgia
Fields of Competence
Environmental engineering in emergency response at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
Responsible for site investigations, including development and implementation of sampling plans
and safety plans. Development of engineering strategies for cleanup and stabilization activities
and on-site project management. Environmental engineering in construction, closure, and post-
closure of municipal solid waste landfills. Involved with both design aspects and the field level
implementation of landfill construction. ·
Experience Summary
• Five years as work assignment manager on U.S. EPA remedial projects under the
Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy (ARCS) Contract. Projects included remedial
investigation, feasibility studies, remedial design and remedial actions at CERCLA NPL
sites.
•
•
•
One year experience on solid waste landfill projects relating to pern1itting requirements,
compliance monitoring, design considerations, and construction monitoring. Assigned
as project engineer to provide third-party engineering oversight during construction of
a new landfill adjacent to closure activities of an existing landfill. Monitored quality
control activities during construction in accordance with plans and specifications.
Four years experience on hazardous waste investigations ranging from site assessments
to project design and on-site monitoring of cleanup and stabilization activities. Directed
an interdisciplinary team on over 30 site assessments involving sampling and
investigating to determine the specific environmental and public health threats.
Responded to over 10 reported oil spills including sampling and engineering support at
the Ashland Major Oil Spill . Performed 17 SPCC inspections at a variety of holding
facilities. Served as project engineer in developing work plans at three
stabilization/removal actions requiring close contact with the ERCS contractor.
Seven years of experience as a petroleum production engineer for a major oil company
in South Louisiana and West Texas. Major areas of work included well stinlulation, tank
battery and pumping equipment installations, well log analysis, subsurface structure
mapping, drilling sample analysis, and petroleum reserves evaluation.
NOR/ J: \ BIOS\ MCKEEN .ARC/ 1 2/97
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
Employment History
1987-Present WESTON
1980-1987 Texaco, Inc.
Key Projects
RALPH P. McKEEN, P.E.
(Continued)
Lewisburg Dump Site, Lewisburg, TN, U.S. EPA South Superfund Branch, Work
Assignment Manager. Performed remedial design and remedial action oversight activities.
Project involved the regrading and placement of a low permeability cap over an abandoned
municipal landfill containing hazardous constituents. Responsible for providing design reviews
for technical and regulatory adequacy with respect to the consent order.
Nassau County, FL, West Nassau Landfill Construction and Closure, Project Engineer.
Performed third-party engineering oversight activities during the construction of a new Class I
landfill and closure of an exiting landfill. Project included monitoring of a slurry wall
installation designed to provide an impenneable horizontal barrier to groundwater during
excavation act1v1t1es. Project required close monitoring of quality control procedures and
requirements. of the associated construction permits.
Nassau County, FL, Bryceville 'and Lofton Creek Landfill Closures. Reviewed permits and
revised the plans and specifications for solicitation of construction bid quotations. Project
involved all aspects of closure activities as well as post-closure maintenance activities such as
groundwater monitoring.
Howe Valley Landfill, Howe Valley, KY, U.S. EPA South Superfund Branch, Work
Assignment Manager. Performed remedial design and remedial action oversight activities.
Project involved the excavation of contaminated soils for aeration by roto-tilling methods at the
former industrial waste landfill. Reviewed remedial design documents and remedial action plans
to ensure compliance with Federal and state regulations.
4 H Camp/Buckhannon, WV, U.S. EPA Emergency Response Section, Team Leader and
Project Engineer. Designed and managed the stabilization of a tar pit by capping. The design
included a unique approach using a construction fabric over the tar pit, which provided stability
for a soil cover. Project also required close on-site project management for installation.
NOR/J:\BIOS\MCKEEN.ARC/2 2/97
======~•~======~•~=====
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
CHARLES 8. ADAMS
Registration
Geologist-in-Training (GIT) m the State of Georgia, Georgia State Board for Professional
Geologists
Fields of Competence
Hydrogeology; remedial investigations; contamination assessments; installation of groundwater
monitoring wells; groundwater sampling; geographic information system database management;
Phase I and II environmental site assessments.
Experience Summary
• Field management and execution of hydrogeological investigations, Phase I and
II assessments, Health and Safety Management of multi-person field efforts;
investigation derived waste (IDW) inventory, supervision of drilling (Direct Push
Technology, Hollow Stem Auger, and Wash Rotary).
• Implementation of RCRA Facility Investigation work plans, groundwater
·· monitoring plans, !itle V air permitting requirements, and aquifer testing.
• Preparations of work plans, proposals, data reduction and interpretation, health
and safety plans, Corrective Action Plans, and data reports.
• Experience in database management utilizing various Geographic Information
Systems (GIS). Experience includes: mapping of geospatial data; development
of potentiometric surface maps, chemical isoconcentration maps, well construction
diagrams, and boring logs; management of laboratory analytical data, field data,
and aerial photographic information.
Credentials
B.S., Geology -State University of West Georgia (1996)
M.A., Psychology -State University of West Georgia (1993)
B.S., Psychology -Georgia State University (1991)
Site Health and Safety Coordinator Course, OSHA 29 CPR 19!0.120(e)(4), WESTON (1997)
Employment History
1997-Present WESTON
1996-1997 Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc.
NOA/J:\8I0S\AOAMS.WP /1 04/98
Key Projects
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
CHARLES B. ADAMS
(Continued)
RCRA Facility Investigation, Confidential Client, Harrisburg, NC, Geologist. Responsible
for sampling plan implementation. Responsible for organizing daily sampling schedule for over
500 soil borings, and numerous surface water, groundwater, and sediment samples.
Groundwater Sampling, Barksdale Air Force Base, Air Force Center for Environmental
Excellence (AFCEE), Shreveport, LA, Site Geologist. Responsibilities include sampling of
monitor wells, site health and safety supervision, and sampling plan implementation. Data
reduction and compilation of field data into GIS database.
Piezometer Installation, Confidential Client, Laurens, SC, Site Manager. Responsibilities
include supervising the installation of three piezometers, inventory of IDW, and site health and
safety management.
Groundwater Monitoring, West Point Foundry, West Point, GA, Site Geologist.
Responsibilities include sampling of monitor wells, site health and safety supervision, data
reduction, and report preparation of Quarterly Monitoring Reports in compliance with the
Corrective Action Plan (CAP).
Title V Permit, Confidential Cfient, Augusta, GA, Geoscientist. Implementation of Title V
Air Permitting. Responsible for producing and updating an emissions inventory and calculation
of actual and potential emissions values for a large scale ceramics manufacturing plant.
Responsible for site visit and collection of production information for emissions calculations,
update of emission control device inventory, and composition/submittal of Title V Air Permit.
GIS Database Management, Confidential Client, Harrisburg, NC, GIS Manager.
Responsibilities included database management of a RCRA facility including mapping of soil
borings, monitoring wells, and surface. water sampling points. Drafting well construction
diagrams, boring logs, potentiometric and chemical isoconcentration maps, and database
management of laboratory analytical data.
Temporary Well Installation, Confidential Client, Dublin, GA, Site Geologist.
Responsibilities included supervision of the installation of 15 temporary wells using Direct Push
Technology, collection of groundwater samples, and site health and safety supervision.
Aquifer Testing, Confidential Client, Norcross, GA, Site Geologist. Responsible for aquifer
testing of twelve monitor wells, data analysis, and interpretation of results.
GIS Database Management, Confidential Client Laurens, SC, Geoscientist. Responsibilities
include database management of laboratory analytical data, drafting potentiometric maps, site
maps, boring logs, well construction diagrams, and geologic cross-sections.
NOR/J:\BIOS\ADAMS.WP /2 04/98
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
CHARLES B. ADAMS
(Continued)
Key Projects (Continued)
GIS Database Management, Confidential Client, Decatur, AL, Geoscientist. Responsibilities
include database management of laboratory analytical data, producing potentiometric maps, site
maps, and cross-sections.
Phase I Environmental Assessments (EA), Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA,
Geoscientist. Responsible for conducting a Phase I site investigation, researching historical
facility information, and report preparation.
Statistical Analysis, Dougherty County Board of Commissioners, Albany, GA, Geoscientist.
Responsible for compliance monitoring and statistical evaluation of a solid waste facility. Duties
included calculating groundwater statistics using EPA's Groundwater Information Tracking
System with Statistical Analysis Capability (GRITS/STAT) Tracking, trend analysis, and report
preparation.
Monitor Well Installation, West Point Foundry, West Point, Troup County, GA, Site
Geologist. Responsible for the supervision of the installation of three monitor wells, and site
health and safety supervision, data reduction and report preparation of field investigation.
GIS Database Management, Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina, Geoscientist.
Responsibilities include hydrogeologic characterization, development of potentiometric surface
maps, site maps, well construction diagrams, boring logs, drafting geologic maps, Rose
diagrams of natural fractures, and geologic cross-sections.
EPA Oversight, Schuylkill Metals of Plant City, Plant City, FL, Geoscientist. Oversight of
groundwater sampling. Responsible for Quality Assurance of low flow sampling in accordance
with the USEPA's SOPs.
EPA Oversight, Woolfolk Chemical Works Site, Fort Valley, GA, Geoscientist. Oversight
of sedin1ent and soil sampling. Responsible for Quality Assurance of sampling in accordance
with the USEPA's SOPs.
Publications
Adams, C.B., and Klamke, C. 1996. Geochemical Monitoring of Kiser Creek, Buchanan,
Haralson County, Georgia. Georgia Journal of Science, Volume 54, No. 1-1996.
NOR/J:\810S\ADAMS.WP /3
======~•~======••~======
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
CHANDRA M. MCNEIL-NORTON
Registration
Licensed Attorney with the State Bar of Georgia
Fields of Competence
Legal research and writing; contract negotiation; regulatory review and interpretation;
environmental policy analysis and technical writing; financial and project analysis; budget
support and cost projections, and statistical analysis.
Experience Summary
• Extensive training in procurement and subcontract activity under Federal
contracts; contract compliance with EPA Property Control guidelines, Federal
Acquisition Regulations (FAR), Environmental Protection Agency Acquisition
Regulations (EPAAR), and Brooks Bill procedures
• Three years of legal experience, including research and writing of various legal
documents, filing of these documents with the courts, and contract management
·· and negotiation.
• Development of project financial data, annual solid waste budgets and monthly
operating expenditures.
• Review and analysis of Governmental Accounting Standards Board's (GASB)
newly promulgated accounting standards for landfill accounting for closure and
post-closure care.
• Review and interpretation of RCRA' s Subtitle D financial assurance requirements.
Credentials
J.D. -Howard University School of Law (1992)
B.S., Accounting -University of Southern Mississippi (1989)
Member, American Bar Association
Member, National Bar Association
Employment History
1993-Present
1991-1992
1991
WESTON
Shannon & Luchs Property Management
Schwartz & Associates
NOR/G:\HOME\8I0S\MCNEIL/1 10/93
======~•~======!•~=====
PROFESSIONAL PROFILE
CHANDRA M. MCNEIL-NORTON
(Continued)
Employment History (Continued)
1990
1986-1989
Key Projects
Young, Scanlon & Sessums, P.A.
Forman, Perry, Watkins & Krutz
Alternative Remedial Contracting Services (ARCS) Region IV Contract, U.S. EPA. Assist
work assignment managers in development of work plans and cost projections; review monthly
program invoices and progress reports for accuracy; conduct financial audits of Regional ARCS
contracts; assure compliance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR); currently assisting
EPA with the research and development of a performance-based specification model to be used
for subcontract activity under the ARCS contracts.
Third Party Engineer's Financial and Feasibility Report, Nassau County, Florida. Financial
projections for capital debt service and annual operating budgets and assuring compliance in the
funding of all required closure and post-closure care accounts relative to $27 million financing
and the county solid waste management system, including the closure of 3 landfills and the
construction involving a 30-acre Class I and Class ill disposal site and an existing landfill.
Solid Waste Budget Plan, Nassau County, Florida. Establishing county's annual operating
budget, assisting in the county's budget workshops and reviewing the adopted budget on a
monthly basis to ensure compliance.
Solid Waste Financial Analysis, Dalton-Whitfield County, Georgia. Assisted in conducting
a preliminary financial analysis related to anticipated costs associated with development of the
Dalton-Whitfield County Subtitle D landfill.
Solid Waste Database, Southern States Energy Board. Consolidating solid waste data sources
in the southern region into a single database and evaluated data based on objective criteria.
NOA/G:\HOME\B!OS\MCNEIL/2 10/93