NCD095458527_20030123_FCX Inc. (Statesville)_FRBCERCLA LTAR_LTAR Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report May - October 2002 OU-1-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Document Control No. RFW133-2A-AMLP
Revision 0
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION
OCTOBER 2002
SEMI-ANNUAL SAMPLING EVENT REPORT
(MAY 2002 THROUGH OCTOBER 2002)
FCX-STATESVILLE OPERABLE UNIT 1
GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Work Assignment No. 133-RALR-048M
January 2003
REGIONS
U.S. EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-W7-0026
Weston Solutions, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, Georgia 30092
WESTON W.O. No. 20064.133.100.0930
I,
1''
I
; l.J L ,.
r I • , .
' , I
JAN 2 7 2003
I ,
NOR/C:\MyFites\My Documents\Projects\20064·133 F C X\Optioo Yem 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 -3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Prepared By:
Approved By:
Approved By:
Approved By:
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION
OCTOBER 2002
SEMI-ANNUAL SAMPLING EVENT REPORT
(MAY 2002 THROUGH OCTOBER 2002)
REVISION0
FCX-STATESVILLE OPERABLE UNIT I
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. EPA Contract No. 68-W7-0026
Work Assignment No. 133-RALR-048M
Document Control No. RFWl33-2A-AMLP
January 2003
Date:
ep Ferentz
STON Site Manager
«~ Date:
WESTON Quality Assurance
~~ Date:
p(I.--James M. Burton, P.E.
Program Manager
1/23/os
I /22/03 I ,
1/2p/c,3 ~ ,
Date: ________ _
Ken Mallary
EPA Region 4 Remedial Project Manager
RFW133-2A· AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly fo, EPA II shall not be disclosed. in whole Of in part, without the exp,ess written permission of EPA
NOR/C:\MyFiles\My Documents\Projacts\20064-133 F C X\Oplioo Year 1\0930 Report Project. Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Reportl0ct2002 -3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Title
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1-1
I.I Purpose .................................................................................................... 1-l
1.2 Background ............................................................................................. 1-1
1.3 Lithology and Hydrogeology .................................................................. 1-5
1.4 Long-Term Response Action .................................................................. 1-6
SECTION 2 LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION ............................................................. 2-1 2.1 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) ....................................................... 2-1
2.2 Groundwater Monitoring ......................................................................... 2-1
SECTION 3 LTRA SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 3-1
3 .1 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Summary ....................................... 3-1
3.2 Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event -October 2002 ............................. 3-3
3.2.1 Groundwater Monitoring ................................................................... 3-3
3.2.1.1 Monitoring Well Sample Results .......................................... 3-3
3.2.1.2 QA/QC Sample Results ......................................................... 3-6
3.2.2 Treatment System Monitoring ........................................................... 3-6
3.2.2.1 Water Level Elevations ......................................................... 3-7
3.2.2.2 Treatment System Results ..................................................... 3-9
3.2.2.3 POTW Discharge ................................................................ 3-10
3.2.2.4 Mass Removal Calculation .................................................. 3-11
SECTION 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... 4-1
SECTIONS REFERENCES .................. : ............................................................................... 5-1
RFW133-2A· AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA
NOR/C:\MyFiles\My OOa.Jments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Y1Jar 110930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 • 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
I
I
D
Figure
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
LIST OF FIGURES
Title
Site Location Map
Site Map
Shallow Aquifer Potentiometric Surface Map
Alpha-BHC Concentration Map
Beta-BHC Concentration Map
Gamma-BHC Concentration Map
Gamma Chlordane Concentration Map
I, 1-Dichloroethane (DCA) Concentration Map
Chloroform Concentration Map
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) Concentration Map
Trichloroethene (TCE) Concentration Map
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chromium Concentration Map
Manganese Concentration Map
Quick Flow Model Results -May 2002
Quick Flow Model Results -June 2002
Quick Flow Model Results -July 2002
Quick Flow Model Results -August 2002
Quick Flow Model Results -September 2002
Quick Flow Model Results -October 2002
Quick Flow Model Results -May 2002 through October 2002
II RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e,::pressly !or EPA. II shall not be disclosed. In whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
NOR/C:\MyFiles\My OOOJments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Optioo Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\Jrd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002-3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Table
2
3
4
5
6
7
LIST OFT ABLES
Title
Groundwater Remediation Levels
Summary of Monitoring Well Analytical Results
Water Level Data
Modeling Data
Influent and Effluent Results
Recovery Well Flow Meter Readings-Cubic Feet
Recovery Well Flow Meter Readings-Gallons
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A -City Discharge Permit
APPENDIX B -System Check Forms
APPENDIX C -Purge Forms
APPENDIX D-Traffic Reports and Chain of Custody
APPENDIX E -Laboratory Analytical Reports
APPENDIX F -Trend Analyses Charts
APPENDIX G-Depth to Water Charts
lll RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It &hall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Oocuments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Ye• 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Repori\Oct2002. 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.I PURPOSE
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
· Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
EPA Region 4 tasked Weston Solutions, Inc., formerly Roy F. Weston, Inc., (WESTON@) to
perform the Long Term Response Action (L TRA) at the Farmers Cooperative Exchange (FCX) -
Statesville site, Operable Unit One (OU!) in Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina. The
work is being performed under the Region 5 Response Action Contract (RAC) No. 68-W7-0026.
The L TRA includes performing weekly operation and maintenance of a pump and treat system
designed to capture and treat groundwater contaminated with pesticides and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and semi-annual groundwater sampling of a network of 18 monitoring
wells.
1.2 BACKGROUND
The following information comes from the January 24, 2000 Statement of Work. The FCX-
Statesville property is located at the intersection of Phoenix Street and West Front Street
(Highway 90) approximately 1.5 miles west of downtown Statesville. The Site is approximately
5.5 acres in size. The coordinates of the Site are 35°47'1 I" north and 80°54'58" west. The Site is
bound to the north by the Norfolk-Southern Railroad and Burlington Industries (formerly
Beaunit Mills), to the west by the Carnation Milk Company property, to the south by residential
and small businesses, and to the east by a prefabricated utility and sales lot (Figure I).
Beginning around 1940, FCX began operations as an agricultural distribution center. These
operations included the formulation, repackaging, warehousing, and distribution of farm
chemicals, primarily pesticides and fertilizers, along with the milling and sale of feed grains. The
repackaging of liquid pesticides was discontinued in 1966 and dust repackaging in 1969.
1-1 RFW133·2A· AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without lhe express written permission at EPA.
C:\MyFiles\My Documents\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3fd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002. 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
Third Semi•Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
The following information comes from the January 1999 Remedial Action Report. The site is
currently abandoned. The dominant on-site structure is a warehouse located on the western half
of the property. The warehouse consists of two attached structures: an upper building,
constructed in 1968 or 1970, and a smaller, lower building constructed in 1982. The area south
of the warehouse is paved except for a narrow grass strip along the sidewalk. The eastern half of
the site is dominated by a large concrete pad, 6 inches to 7 inches thick, 62 feet wide, and 190
feet long, extending from the eastern end of the warehouse along the north property line. The
area south of the pad is covered almost entirely with approximately 6 to 12 inches of crushed,
compacted gravel. Several smaller areas within this area, mostly tractor-trailer pads and parking
area, are paved with either concrete or asphalt. The area, except for the paved area between the
warehouse and West Front Street, is completely fenced, mostly with chain-link fencing. The
fence is in good condition and access is gained via Phoenix Street through a 36-foot-wide gate
along the eastern end of the site. The gate is locked with a heavy chain and padlock.
During the summer and early fall of 1991, U.S. EPA Region IV, conducted an in-house Phase I
RI at FCX. The investigation involved extensive sampling (237 samples) of on-and off-site soil,
groundwater, surface water, and sediment. Significant findings relating to groundwater
contamination are summarized in this section.
Samples from on-site monitoring wells indicated that both the surficial (saprolite) and bedrock
portions of the groundwater system beneath the site are contaminated with pesticides, primarily
Iindane, BHC compounds, endrin ketone, and chlordane.
A variety of chlorinated solvents were detected in groundwater samples from on-site monitoring
wells, as well as the process well located on the Carnation property west of the site. The highest
level of contaminant observed was tetrachloroethylene (PCE), with concentrations in excess of
100 micrograms per liter (µg/L) being detected.
Phase II of the FCX RI was primarily an expanded investigation of groundwater quality and
alleged trench location. Existing, on-site permanent monitoring wells and a network of 12
1-2 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. II shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express wri!ten permission of EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Documen!s\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 • 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: J,muary 2003
temporary monitoring wells, located both on-site and off-site, were sampled to provide further
groundwater characterization.
The Phase JI groundwater sampling program was designed primarily to evaluate the extent of
pesticide contamination. Samples for purgeable organic compound analyses were also collected
to obtain additional information on the extent of the chlorinated solvents. The pattern of
contamination and groundwater flow patterns developed during Phase I of the investigation
formed the basis for selection of the temporary monitoring well and permanent bedrock
monitoring well locations chosen by EPA for Phase II.
Most of the temporary monitoring wells were installed to provide additional data to be used to
' evaluate the lateral extent of contaminants in the overburden portion of the aquifer. One of the
temporary wells, however, was installed to evaluate contamination previously identified m
permanent well MW-3 that was higher than detected in any of the other permanent wells.
In the saprolite, pesticides in groundwater are restricted to the FCX property, with the exception
of one detection of lindane. Lindane is one of the most mobile pesticides, and would therefore be
expected to migrate farther than the other pesticides; however, the presence of lindane in the off-
site well is difficult to explain. If the estimated movement of lindane in the saprolite is projected
to be equal to the groundwater velocity, it would take over I 00 years for lindane to move through
the saprolite from the closest area of lindane groundwater contamination on the site to the off-
site well. Also, the well is not directly downgradient of areas of pesticide contamination at the
site.
The modeled potential extent of pesticide contaminant plumes in the saprolite based on the
observed lindane indicated that migration ranged from only a few feet from the source area for
DDT and DDD to over 100 feet from the source area for the most mobile pesticides.
Contaminant migration rates in the bedrock are projected to be faster than contaminant migration
rates in the saprolite. Only the more mobile pesticides (BHCs and endrin ketone) have been
found in samples from any bedrock wells, indicating that the vertical movement of the other, less
mobile pesticides through the saprolite has not yet been detected in the bedrock groundwater.
1-3 RFW133-2A· AMLP
This docvment was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly f0t EPA. It shall not be disclosed. in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
C:\MyFiles\My Oocuments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Arvlual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 • 3rd semi-annual rptdoc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
The results of soil transport modeling show that, potentially, the trichloroethene (TCE), PCE,
and related contaminants detected in groundwater beneath the site may have been leached from
soils along the northern side of the site at some time in the past. It is therefore possible that some
of the VOC contamination now detected in groundwater beneath the site is the result of past
leaching of VOC contaminated soils. The location of TCE and PCE contaminated soils beneath
mostly impervious areas suggests that present soil leaching of these contaminants from FCX is
likely to be insignificant.
VOCs have generally been found in soils in concentrations of less than 10 µg/kg and are mostly
present in soil samples from less than 3 feet deep. Soil VOCs are primarily TCE and PCE.
Groundwater samples indicated contamination by VOCs in excess of the Federal Maximum
Contaminant Levels (MCLs) and the North Carolina Drinking Water Standards, both beneath the
site and in a plume extending downgradient of the site. The distribution of the chlorinated VOCs
in soils, groundwater, sediment, and surface water samples indicates that some of the VOC
contamination may have originated from an off-site source to the north of the FCX property.
Some groundwater samples also contain metals in excess of Federal or state groundwater or
drinking water quality standards. According to the Phase II RI (EPA, 1992) these metals
concentrations do not appear to be directly site-related.
As part of OU3, additional monitoring wells were installed in the vicinity of FCX, and select
wells were sampled in December 1995. Monitoring wells MW-Ss, MW-Sd, MW-11, W-22, W-
23, W-24, W-25, W-27, and W-29 were sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, metals, pesticides, and
PCBs.
The sampling confirmed that in the saprolite, pesticides in the groundwater are restricted to the
FCX property. However, lindane and alpha-BHC were detected in off-site bedrock well MW-11,
suggesting that these more mobile pesticides may have migrated to bedrock, where contaminant
migration rates are projected to be faster than contaminant migration rates in the saprolite.
1-4 RFW133-2A-AMLP
Ttiis document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall no! be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Docurnents\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Yea" 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\0ct2002-3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l11ird Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
ROD cleanup goals were exceeded for alpha and beta BHC and lindane in three wells. Alpha-
BHC and lindane concentrations exceeded cleanup goals in MW-5s and MW-5d (on-site
saprolite and bedrock wells, respectively) and MW-11. Beta-BHC exceeded cleanup goals m
MW-5s and MW-5d.
Analytical results from groundwater sampling indicate that VOC concentrations in groundwater
exceed the MCLs and North Carolina Drinking Water Standards both beneath the site and
downgradient of the site. VOCs exceeding MCLs were detected in both saprolite and bedrock
wells. The highest concentrations of VOCs were detected in groundwater sampled from bedrock
wells.
1.3 LITHOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
The following information comes from the September 1993 Declaration for the Record of
Decision. The FCX site lies within the geologic belt known as the Blue Ridge-Inner Piedmont
Belt. The soils at the site are primarily silts or clays. The Blue Ridge-Inner Piedmont Belt
generally consists of metamorphic rocks including gneisses and schists, as well as gradations of
the two types. Most of these rocks near the surface have weathered into a layer of overburden
overlying the fractured, but relatively unweathered bedrock. The overburden ranges in thickness
from 15 to 40 feet at the site, and consists of saprolite and residual soils interspersed with
unweathered gneiss/schists. Granitic intrusions are also common in the area of the site. Soils in
the general area of the site belong to the Lloyd Association. These soils are characterized as
deep, well-drained soils with a subsoil of dark, red clay.
Groundwater at the site occurs in an unconfined to semi-confined aquifer consisting of the
overburden hydraulically interconnected with the underlying fractured bedrock. The saturated
overburden serves as a groundwater reservoir that supplies water to the fractures, faults, and
other secondary permeability features in the bedrock. The approximate depth to groundwater in
the saturated overburden in the vicinity of the site generally ranges from 27 to 30 feet below land
surface. During the wetter periods of the year, groundwater may intersect the ground surface and
become overland or surface water flow.
1-5 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed. in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Oocuments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Per1\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 -3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
The following information comes from the January 1999 Remedial Action Report. FCX is
located in a hilltop topographic setting. Such hilltop topographic locations are characteristically
groundwater recharge zones. In groundwater recharge zones, groundwater flow usually has a
downward component and the migration of contaminants into deeper parts of an aquifer may be
enhanced in such areas. Water quality data suggest that this is the case at FCX.
The soil permeability, or hydraulic conductivity, controls the amount of groundwater recharge,
surface-water runoff and percolation, and rate of contaminant migration through the saturated
zone. At FCX, the calculated hydraulic conductivity in the saprolite is approximately 1.62 x 10·6
ft/sec, which is indicative of a relatively low permeability unit. This thickness of the unsaturated
zone should allow for substantial soil immobilization of many of the site-related contaminants.
Bedrock hydraulic conductivity in this area is typically highly variable, with limited zones of
high or moderate permeability along rock fractures, separated by substantial interfracture areas
of extremely low or no permeability. The contrast in hydraulic conductivity between the bedrock
and saprolite will also facilitate groundwater to flow downward from the saprolite into the
bedrock.
The hydraulic gradient appears to steepen toward the south and east. The variations m the
hydraulic gradient suggest that the site is near a groundwater divide.
The high soil clay content reduces the mobility of both organic compounds and inorganic
substances. In bedrock, fracture flow predominates, favoring increased contaminant mobility in
the bedrock (EPA Phase II RI, 1992).
1.4 LONG-TERM RESPONSE ACTION
The following information comes from the January 24, 2000 Statement of Work and the January
1999 Remedial Action Report. EPA tasked WESTON under ARCS Contract 68-W9-0057 to
install a ground water pump-and-treat system and to operate the system under work assignment
no. 78-4RA8M. That work assignment provided for the operation and maintenance (O&M) of the
1-6 RFW133·2A·AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly IO"" EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Oocuments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 110930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 -3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
u
I
I
u
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statcsville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
L TRA from April 1998 ,through May 1999, at which time the work assignment was closed out
because the ARCS contract expired. No L TRA was performed from May 1999 to April 2000.
The Operable Unit I (OU I) ground water pump-and-treat system consists of ten (I 0) 4-inch
vertical recovery wells (RW-1 through RW-10) and pneumatic submersible pumps for ground
water extraction; four transfer pumps; a 300-gallon holding tank; a 1,200-gallon baffled holding
tank; two (2) sand filters; and two (2) granular-activated carbon (GAC) units for treatment. The
treatment system, powered by Duke Power, Inc., was transported to the site on April 25, 1998
and was installed by Envirosys, Inc. of Tampa, Florida on a level gravel pad that was prepared
for the system at the site for treatment.
Groundwater is extracted from the overburden materials beneath the FCX property using I 0
extraction wells and transported to an on-site treatment facility for treatment by filtration and
carbon adsorption. Treated groundwater is discharged to the local publicly owned treatment
works (POTW) under discharge permit T-43 issued by the City of Statesville (Appendix A).
The ten recovery wells (RW-1 through RW-10) were installed and developed for the extraction
system. Each of these wells was completed with four-inch outside diameter PVC casing and has
40 feet of 0.010-inch screen. Total depths ranged from 56.5 to 65 feet below ground surface.
Pneumatically operated pumps were installed in each well and all wells were theri permanently
plumbed to the treatment system. Plumbing consisted of a ¾-inch diameter Schedule 80 PVC
airline and a 2-inch Schedule 40 PVC water influent line. The airline supplies pressure to operate
the pneumatic pumps while the influent line transports water pumped from the wells into the
treatment system. These lines run parallel and are buried from 1.5 to 2.5 feet below ground
surface. In areas necessitating aboveground installation (between RW-4 and RW-5 and at the
treatment system entry), the water line was insulated with foam insulation.
From April 1998 through May 1999 various activities were implemented as part of the O&M of
the treatment system including: performing routine maintenance and repairs; weekly ground
water level measurements from the existing monitoring wells and recovery wells; recording
instrument readings; recording flow meter measurements from the recovery wells as well as
1-7 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc .. expressly for EPA It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA
C:\MyFi!es\My Documents\Projects\20064· 133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Projed Perl\3td Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002. 3rd semi-annual rpt doc
u
I
I
I
I
I
g
I
B
B
B
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
effluent discharge, collecting influent and effluent samples from the system for analysis, and
collecting ground water samples from the designated monitoring wells on a quarterly basis for
analysis. Currently, there are twelve permanent groundwater-monitoring wells on the FCX
property, as well as six wells further downgradient (Figure 2). Monitoring well W-22, located
within the warehouse, was within the area that has been excavated and backfilled as part of the
remedial action for OU2. During the remedial action, the well was destroyed.
The previous work assignment, 047-RARA-048M, which began April 2000 and was completed on
April 30, 200 I, set the framework and requirements for WESTON to conduct the L TRA which
included system start-up and diagnostic testing, O&M, performance monitoring, and sampling and
reporting at the FCX -Statesville site. The Record of Decision (ROD) issued in September 1993,
describes the RA selected for this site, and the RD documents provide the construction and
implementation detail required to achieve the selected RA.
The current work assignment provides for the continuing implementation of the L TRA.
1-8 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA It sha!I not be disclosed. in .....-hole or in par1, without the &XPfess written permission ol EPA.
C:\MyFilas\My Documents\Projacts\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Roport\Oct2002 -3rd semi-annual rpl.doc
I
0
B
B
I
0
I
I
I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 2
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statcsville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION
2.1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M)
Applied Earth Sciences (AES) has been contracted by WESTON to perform O&M. O&M is
performed on a weekly basis while additional site visits for non-routine maintenance are
conducted on an "as needed" basis. In addition to performing maintenance to the system, the
subcontractor records the system operating parameters such as recovery well flow meter
readings, weekly discharge meter readings, pressure gauge readings, the time of the inspection
and/or readings, and measures the groundwater elevation in the recovery wells.
2.2 GROUNDW ATERMONITORING
The subcontractor is required to perform semi-annual groundwater sampling. Groundwater from
twelve on-site and six off-site monitoring wells and the influent and effluent to the OU I pump
and treat system are sampled and analyzed for the contaminants of concern.
The purpose of the monitoring is to verify:
• that the pump and treat system is effective,
• that cleanup standards for groundwater are achieved throughout the L TRA, and
• that the system meets the effluent limits of the discharge permit.
The contaminants of concern and the corresponding remediation levels and discharge limits are
provided in Table I.
The subcontractor is also required to record the water level in each of the extraction wells each
week. The purpose for collecting groundwater elevations is to determine if the system is
providing adequate capture of the contaminant plume beneath the site.
2-1 RFW133·2A· AMLP
This dOOJment was prepared by Weston Solutions, lnc., expressly for EPA. It shalt not be disclosed, in whole or in port, without the express written permission of EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Documents\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Qplion Yeas 1\0930 Report Projed. P6ff\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report10ct2002-3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
B
I
B
u
D
I
I
D
B
I
I
D
B
I
I
u
0
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
The samples are collected in accordance with the following documents:
• Long Term Response Action Sampling And Analysis Plan, dated April 2000, and
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science and Ecosystem Support Division (EPA-
SESD), Region 4, revised Environmental Investigation Standard Operating Procedure
and Quality Assurance Manual (EISOPQAM), November 200 I.
Laboratories in the Contract Laboratory Program analyze all samples with the exception of the
effluent sample. Prism Laboratories located in Charlotte, North Carolina analyzed the effluent
sample. Samples are analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), base/neutral acids
(BNAs), pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and total metals.
2-2 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disdosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
C:\MyFiles\My Oocuments\Projeets\20Cl64-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Pert.3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Qct2002 • 3rd semi-annual rpt doc
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
g
9
D
I
R
u
I
I
SECTION3
LTRA SUMMARY
Third Semi-Annual Sampling E-.·ent Report
FCX-Statesvil\e Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
3.1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) SUMMARY
O&M activities were performed on a weekly basis from May 2002 through October 2002 and are
summarized below. Weekly O&M reports are included in Appendix B.
May2002
• AES performed three weekly site visits for routine O&M.
On May I, 2002, AES personnel began preparations to replace the air compressor motor.
• On May 7, 2002, AES personnel and an Ingersoll-Rand technician replaced the air
compressor motor. Minor adjustments, including placing the compressor in "idle mode,"
were also made to the compressor so that it would run at its optimum performance level.
• On May IO and 13, 2002, AES personnel began preparing for the change-out of the
granular activated carbon (GAC). The tanks were drained and access ports were opened.
, On May 14, 2002, AES and Envirotrol personnel completed replacement of the GAC in
both 2,000-pound tanks. The spent GAC was manifested for off-site disposal.
• On May 29, 2002, AES personnel replaced a broken PVC airline.
June 2002
• AES performed four weekly site visits for routine O&M.
•
•
•
On June 4, 2002, AES removed the pump on loan from Clean Environment Equipment
and replaced it with the original, newly serviced, pump.
On June 11, 2002, AES personnel replaced a broken PVC airline .
On June 12, 2002, AES personnel arrived at the site to find the system was not running .
This was determined to be from low oil level in the compressor. It was also determined
that previous adjustments to the compressor caused oil to be discharged into the airline
thereby lowering the oil level. Oil was added to the compressor motor, the compressor
was taken off "idle mode" and the system was restarted.
3-1 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This dOOJment was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall no! bo disclosed, in whole or in par1, without the express written permission of EPA.
C:\MyFiles\My Documents\Projec!s\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\Jrd Semi-Mnual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 -3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
, On June 28, 2002, AES mobilized to the site in response to an alarm received on June 27,
2002 at 0700 hours. The alarm was the result of a power failure. The airline was also
noted be broken again. The system remained off until repairs could be made.
, On June 29, 2002, AES replaced the airline from the compressor and restarted the
system.
July 2002
• AES performed five weekly site visits for routine O&M.
, On July 3, 2002 AES found the airline from the compressor was broken. Excessive
amounts of oil were also observed in the airline. After consultation with an Ingersoll-
Rand representative, it was determined that excessive wear and tear to the pumps of the
compressor and worn a-rings resulted in oil being introduced into the airline. Since the
oil is corrosive to PVC cement, breakages were occurring where the oil reacted with the
PVC cement at connections in the PVC airline.
• On July 5, 2002, AES and Ingersoll-Rand personnel removed the pump from the
compressor for servicing.
, On July 6, 2002, AES and Ingersoll-Rand personnel returned to the site to install the
newly machined parts.
, On July 8, 2002, AES repaired the airline, installed a coalescent filter on the airline, and
restarted the system.
August 2002
, AES performed four weekly site visits for routine O&M.
September 2002
• AES performed four weekly site visits for routine O&M.
• On September 24, 2002, AES began installation of the float switch and pump for the
secondary containment pond.
October 2002
AES performed four weekly site visits for routine O&M.
, On October 17, 2002, AES observed that air was not being delivered to the recovery
wells due to a malfunctioning solenoid valve on the air compressor. Also, SHE Electrical
wired the float switch in the secondary containment pond to the PLC in the control panel
3-2 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions. tnc., expressly for EPA. II shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission or EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Oocuments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 -3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
of the treatment system. Also, personnel from the City of Statesville cut down weeds and
grass on the FCX site.
• On October 22, 2002, AES arrived on site to begin the semi-annual sampling event.
• On October 23, 2002, AES replaced the solenoid valve and re-started the system.
3.2 THIRD SEMI-ANNUAL SAMPLING EVENT -OCTOBER 2002
3.2.1 Groundwater Monitoring
WESTON and AES personnel mobilized to the site the week of22 October 2002. AES personnel
proceeded to purge and sample the 18 monitoring well network.
Samples were collected on 22-24 October 2002, At least three well volumes were purged from
each monitoring well using a submersible pump or dedicated disposable bailer. Water quality
parameters (pH, specific conductance, temperature, and turbidity), water levels, and depth to
bottom of the well were recorded during purging (Appendix C). Groundwater samples were
collected using hailers, transferred into the appropriate containers, and preserved. Samples were
labeled, sealed with chain of custody seals, and transported via FedEx to the assigned CLP
laboratory (Appendix D). Organic samples were shipped to Shealy Environmental and inorganic
samples were shipped to Liberty Analytical Corp.
Monitoring wells MW-I, MW-2, MW-9, MW-10, W-23, and W-24 were not sampled due to the
lack of available water. MW-3 and MW-4 were analyzed for pesticides only. The remaining
monitoring well samples were analyzed for VOCs, BNAs, pesticides, PCBs, and total metals.
3.2.1.1 Monitoring Well Sample Results
Groundwater samples collected from all of the monitoring wells, with the exception of MW-4,
contained levels of VOCs, pesticides, BNAs, and/or metals that exceeded the remediation levels.
The analytical results are summarized below:
3-3 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, lnc., e~pressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA
C:\MyFi!es\My Doa.Jments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Pert\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Evenl Report\Oct2002 -3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
voes
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
1,1-Dichloroethane (1,1-DCA), chloroform, PCE, and TCE were detected at levels above the
remediation levels in groundwater sampled from monitoring wells MW-5D, MW-5S, MW-6D,
MW-11, W-25, W-27 and W-29.
• 1,1-DCA was detected at 3.2 µg/L in MW-I I, 4.8 µg/L in W-29, and 7.7 µg/L in MW-5D.
• Chloroform was detected at concentrations ranging from 0.32 ~1g/L ( estimated value) to 4.5 µg/L in MW-5D, MW-6D, MW-11, W-25, and W-29.
• PCE was detected at concentrations ranging from 0.77 µg/L to 61 µg/L in MW-5D, MW-5S, MW-6D, MW-11, W-27, and W-29.
• TCE was detected at 7.1 µg/L in MW-5D, 7.2 µg/L in MW-6D, and 4.6 µg/L in W-29.
• I, 1-Dichloroethene (I, 1-DCE), chloromethane, and bromodichloromethane were not detected in any of the monitoring wells above the remediation levels.
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected at levels exceeding the remediation level in MW-5D
and MW-6D.
• Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected at 20 µg/L (estimated value) in MW-6D and at 59 µg/L (estimated value) in MW-5D.
Pesticides
Alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, gamma-BHC (lindane), dieldrin, gamma-chlordane, alpha chlordane,
and heptachlor epoxide were detected at levels exceeding the remediation levels in MW-3, MW-
5D, MW-5S, MW-6S, MW-7, MW-11, W-25, and W-29.
• Alpha-BHC was detected in concentrations ranging from 0.014 µg/L to 3.9 µg/L in MW-3, MW-5D, MW-5S, MW-6D, MW-6S, MW-I I, and W-29.
3-4 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions. Inc., exp<essly for EPA rt shall not be disclosed, In whole or in part, without tho express written permission of EPA
C:\MyFi!os\My Documonts\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Opflon Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Even! Report\Oct2002 • 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX·Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
• Alpha chlordane was detected at a concentration of 0.034 µg/L (estimated value) in W-
25.
• Beta-BHC was detected in concentrations ranging from 0.012 µg/L to 4.3 µg/L in MW-3,
MW-5O, MW-5S, MW-6S, MW-11, and W-25.
• Gamma-BHC (lindane) was detected in concentrations ranging from 0.030 µg/L to 10
µg/L in MW-3, MW-5O, MW-5S, MW-6S, and W-29.
• Heptachlor epoxide was detected at a concentration of 0.043 µg/L (presumptive evidence
and estimated value) in MW-5O and 0.034 µg/L (estimated value) in W-25.
• Gamma-chlordane and dieldrin were not detected in any monitoring wells.
Metals
Beryllium, chromium, manganese, and vanadium were detected in concentrations exceeding the
remediation levels in MW-5O, MW-5S, MW-6S, MW-7, MW-8, MW-11, W-25, and W-27.
• Beryllium was detected at a concentration of 6.2 µg/L in MW-8.
• Chromium was detected in concentrations ranging from 74 µg/L (estimated value) to 270
µg/L in MW-5S, MW-8, W-25, and W-27.
• Manganese was detected in concentrations ranging from 120 µg/L (estimated value) to
2,400 µg/L in MW~5D, MW-5S, MW-6S, MW-7, MW-8, MW-11, W-25, and W-27.
• Vanadium was detected at a concentration of240 µg/L (estimated value) in MW-8.
The laboratory results are summarized in Table 2; complete laboratory results can be found in
Appendix E.
A result of the trend analyses for wells that have consistently contained constituents of concern
greater than the remediation levels from April 2000 to October 2002 indicates that levels or
concentrations of the majority of pesticides in the groundwater, notably alpha-BHC, beta-BI-IC,
gamma-BHC (lindane), and dieldrin tend to decrease over time in monitoring wells MW-3, MW-
5O, MW-6S, MW-6O, and W-29, but increase in MW-5S. For VOCs, the trend analyses
indicates that the majority of VOCs in the groundwater tend to decrease over time in monitoring
3-5 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without tho express written permission of EPA
C.\MyFile5\My Documents\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Even\ Report\Oct2002 • 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesvillc.Opcrable Unit I
Revision: 0
Dale: January 2003
wells MW-5D, MW-6D, MW-11, W-27, and W-29. The trend charts can be found in Appendix
F.
WESTON has developed contaminant concentration contour maps for the VOCs, pesticides,
BNAs, and metals exceeding the remediation levels. The contour maps illustrate the horizontal
extent of groundwater contamination exceeding the remediation level for the shallow and deep
portions of the aquifer below the site (see Figures 4 through 14).
3.2.l.2 QA/QC Sample Results
The site-specific Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) requires quality assurance/quality control
(QA/QC) samples to be collected as part of each groundwater sampling event.
AES collected an equipment blank (EB-01), a field blank (FB-01), and a preservative blank (PB-
01) as required in the SAP. WESTON also submitted two trip blanks (TB-01 and TB-02) with
the organic sample shipments. Duplicate samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-8
and W-29.
Review of the duplicate analyses for monitoring well MW-8 and W-29 indicated acceptable
relative percent difference for all constituents.
Review of the results of volatiles sample analysis indicates possible laboratory contamination in
several of the blanks. PCE was detected in the equipment (0.055 µg/L, estimated value) and
preservative blanks (0. I 6 µg/L estimated values) and in one of the trip blanks (0.13 µg/L
estimated value). Chloroform was detected in the preservative blanks (1.3 µg/L) and in one of
the trip blanks (0.22 µg/L estimated value), and bromodichloromethane was detected at an
estimated value (0.24 µg/L estimated value) in the preservative blank.
3.2.2 Treatment System Monitoring
The treatment system monitoring performed from May 200 I through October 2002 1s
summarized below.
3-6 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole°' in part, without the express 'Nfitten permission of EPA.
C:\MyFiles\My OOOJments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Per1'\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Reportl0ct2002 • 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.2.2.1 Water Level Elevations
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
Water levels were recorded at each monitoring well during sampling events and weekly for each
extraction well (Appendices B and C). The water level information summarized in Table 3 and
visually represented in Appendix G was collected during the April 2002 sampling event; water
level data collected during the October 2002 sampling event was deemed unusable since the
treatment system was down since 17 October 2002.
In addition to water level measurements, flow meter discharge rates were recorded at each
recovery well and at the system effluent. The data was used to model the groundwater elevation
during operation of the system. By modeling the data, trends in changes in the groundwater
elevations can be shown. During periods of pumping, the capture plume of the recovery wells
should overlap the area of the plume indicating a hydraulic barrier to prevent further migration of
contaminants off site.
In order to determine if the contaminant plumes in the saprolite are being captured by the current
recovery system, WESTON utilized the groundwater model QuickFlow, Version 1.12. The
following basic assumptions apply to this situation of simulating pumping in an unconfined
aquifer:
• The aquifer is unconfined.
• The vadose zone has no influence on the drawdown.
• Water initially pumped comes from the instantaneous release of water from elastic
storage.
• Eventually water comes from storage due to gravity drainage of interconnected pores and
fractures.
• The drawdown is negligible compared with the saturated aquifer thickness.
• The specific yield is at least IO times the elastic storage.
• All geological formations are horizontal and of infinite horizontal extent.
3-7 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This doOJment was prepared by Weston Solutions, lnc., expressly for EPA II shall nol be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express wri!len permission of EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Oocuments\Projecis\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Projoct Perf\3n::I Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002. 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
• The potentiometric surface of the aquifer is horizontal and is not changing with time prior
to the start of pumping.
• The changes in the position of the potentiometric surface are due to the effect of the
pumping wells alone.
• The aquifer is homogeneous and isotropic.
• All flow is radial toward the well.
• Groundwater flow is horizontal.
• Groundwater has a constant density and viscosity.
The hydrogeologic data was obtained from the Remedial Action Work Plan (OU!) prepared by
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc. in December 1997. The potentiometric surface
elevations and pumping rates were obtained during field sampling activities conducted m
preparation for the Semi-Annual Reports. Table 4 shows all data used for the model.
Figure 15 shows the model results for the pumping time of 22 days during the month of May.
These results were calculated based on the average pumping rates from the flow meter readings
taken from May 07 -May 29, 2002. Figure 16 shows the model results for the pumping time of
29 days during June (flow meter readings taken from May 30 -June 28, 2002). Figure 17
shows the model results for the pumping time of 3 I days during the month of July (flow meter
readings June 29 -July 29, 2002). Figure 18 shows the model results for the pumping time of 31
days during the month of August (flow meter readings July 30 -August 30, 2002). Figure 19
shows the model results for the pumping time of 24 days during the month of September (flow
meter readings August 31 -September 24, 2002). Figure 20 shows the model results for the
pumping time of 37 days during the month of October (flow meter readings September 25 -
November 01, 2002). Figure 21 show the model results based on the average flow meter data for
the entire reporting period (May 2002 -October 2002) for the pumping time of 174 days. The
model results indicate that the recovery system is capturing the greater part of the plumes during
the entire reporting period. However, capture of the plume appears io be less effective during the
months of August and September due to a lack of meter reading data for recovery well RW-8.
This lack of data causes the model to assume the well is not pumping water. Although R W-8
3-8 RFW133·2A·AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission ol EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Documents\Projects\20064-133 F C XIOption Year 1\0930 Report Project Pert\Jrd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002. 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
was pumpmg during this time period, rates could not be recorded as a result of remedial
activities in the vicinity of this well. If these measurements had been available, it is likely the
plume capture would be very similar to that of the remaining months in the reporting period.
3.2.2.2 Treatment System Results
The purpose of collecting and analyzing the influent and effluent samples of the pump and treat
system is to ensure compliance with the City of Statesville Discharge Permit, T-43 issued on 14
April 2000 and revised on 19 April 2000 and 8 August 2000. The effluent limits and monitoring
requirements of the Permit are as follows:
• Less than the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) (or the minimum quantitation limit
(QL) if the MCL is less than the QL) for volatile hydrocarbons, and
• Less than I µg/1 for pesticides.
Metals, BNAs, and PCBs are not covered under the discharge permit; therefore, the analytical
results for these analyses for the influent and effluent samples will not be discussed. No other
parameters are required to be monitored.
Samples were collected from the influent and effluent sample ports of the pump and treat system
directly into the appropriate containers, and preserved. Samples were then labeled, tagged, and
sealed with chain of custody seals and transported via FedEx to the appropriate laboratory. The
influent sample was submitted to the CLP laboratories with the groundwater samples; the
effluent sample, FCX-Effluent, was submitted to Prism Laboratories, Inc. The influent sample,
IN-01, was analyzed for VOCs, BNAs, pesticides, PCBs, and total metals and the effluent
sample was analyzed for VOCs and pesticides.
Based on laboratory analytical results, the influent sample contained the following detectable
levels ofVOC and pesticide constituents of concern.
• l,1-DCA was detected at a concentration of2.2 µg/L,
• Chloroform was detected at a concentration of 2.2 µg/L,
3-9 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. II shalt not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA
C:IMyFiles\My Documents\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 • 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• PCE was detected at a concentration of38 µg/L, and
• TCE was detected at a concentration of2.2 µg/L.
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesvil\e Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
Other VOCs that were detected in the influent sample include 1, l ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-
trifluoroethane at a concentration of0.57 µg/L (estimated value), 1,2-DCA at a concentration of
0.074 µg/L (estimated value), carbon tetrachloride at a concentration of 0.094 (estimated value)
µg/L, cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE) at a concentration of IO µg/L, trans-I ,2-
Dichloroethene (trans-1,2,-DCE) at a concentration of 0.38 µg/L (estimated value), and methyl
ethyl ketone at a concentration of 5.0 µg/L (estimated value).
• Alpha-BHC was detected at a concentration of 0.41 µg/L,
• Beta-BHC was detected at a concentration of 0.50 µg/L,
• Dieldrin was detected at a concentration of 0.046 µg/L,
• Gamma-BHC (lindane) was detected at a concentration of0.079 ftg/L.
Additionally, endrin ketone was detected at a concentration of 0.13 µg/L ( estimated value).
The laboratory analytical results for the effluent sample indicate that no pesticides or VOCs were
detected above the laboratory-reporting limits. Consequently, the effluent from the pump and
treat system meets the discharge criteria set forth in Discharge Permit T-43.
The laboratory results are summarized in Table 5; complete laboratory reports can be found in
Appendix E.
3.2.2.3 POTW Discharge
After treatment, water is discharged to the City of Statesville sewer system under the conditions
of City Discharge Permit, T-43. The permit was issued pursuant to the requirements of the City
of Statesville Sewer Use Code. Permit conditions require that the discharge not exceed I 00 gpm.
The effluent limits for pesticides and volatile hydrocarbons are required to be less than 1 µg/1
and less than MCL (or the detection limit if none exists), respectively. The MCL is equivalent to
the North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards. Results are required to be submitted to the
3-10 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was pre pored by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express wriUen permission of EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Oocuments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 110930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 -3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statcsville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
City of Statesville, Director of Water Resources Department within 30 days of the sampling
event for each quarter of the year.
AES recorded the discharge flow meters for each extraction well and the effluent meter on the
treatment system. The flow meter readings and calculations can be found in Tables 6 and 7.
Based on the effluent meter during the period of June 2001 through October 2001; the total
quantity of water the remediation system treated and discharged to the city sewer totaled
282,723.45 cubic feet or 2,114,771.41 gallons.
Based on the laboratory analytical results for FCX-Effluent, the treatment system discharge was
within the specified limits of the monitored effluent parameters. No analytes were detected above
the discharge limits.
3.2.2.4 Mass Removal Calculation
Using the analytical results from the influent sample, the mass of contaminants removed from
the groundwater was calculated. According to the calculations, 0.98 pounds of VOCs and 0.02
pounds of pesticides were removed during the reporting period and 32.89 pounds of VOCs and
0.39 of pesticides during the life of the system.
3-11 RFW133-2A-AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Docurnents\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Oplion Year 1\0930 Report Project Per1\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 • 3rd semi.annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 4
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
According to the laboratory results for FCX -OU! LTRA, a contaminant plume with VOC,
BNA, pesticide, and metals concentrations greater than the remediation levels exists beneath the
site and extends downgradient to the southeast towards monitoring well W-29. Review of the
influent sample analytical results indicates that the mass of contaminants is being reduced
through extraction by the pump and treat system.
The operation of the treatment system's recovery wells contributes to an effective hydraulic
barrier to inhibit the migration of the contaminant plume in the saprolite. The model results
indicate that the recovery system is capturing the greater part of the plumes during the entire
reporting period.
Review of the effluent results indicates that the remediation system is effectively treating the
groundwater prior to being discharged to the city sewer.
· Based upon the findings of the April 2002 sampling event, WESTON recommends continuing
O&M and monitoring activities at FCX.
4-1 RFW133-2A· AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly fDf EPA It shall not be disclosed, in 'Nhole or in part, without the express written penTlission of EPA
C:\MyFiles\My Oocuments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 • 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTIONS
REFERENCES
Third Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: January 2003
Freeze, R. Allen and Cherry, John A. Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.,
1979
Roy F. Weston, Inc.: Remedial Action Report, FCX Statesville Operable Unit One, Groundwater
Remediation, Statesville, North Carolina. Norcross, Georgia: McKeen, 1999
U.S. EPA: Declaration for the Record of Decision. Atlanta, Georgia: 1993.
U.S. EPA: Statement of Work for Long-Term Response Action. Atlanta, Georgia: January 2001.
5-1 RFW133-2A· AMLP
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, 1nc.. expressly '°' EPA It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission al EPA
C:\MyFI!es\My Documents\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Qptioo Year 110930 Report Project Perfl3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002. 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURES
NORIC:\MyFiles\My Documents\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Per1\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002. 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I 11 N. C.
D QUADRANGLE LOCATION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
Ll
FIGURE l
SITE LOCATION MAP
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION
FCX-OUl
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
Deep Wells
Depth to Bottom
Well /ft. BTOC)
MW-5O 123.90
MW-6O 123.10
MW-11 77.00
W-29 98.00
Shallow Wells
Depth to Bottom
Well /ft. BTOC)
MW-1 47.25
MW-2 51.00
MW-3 50.80
MW-4 53.70
MW-5S 43.30
MW-6S 54.40
MW-7 53.00
MW-8 57.60
MW-9 45.20
MW-10 47.80
W-23 40.00
W-24 20.00
W-25 25.00
W-27 40.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
LEGEND
_.\ RW-1 Recovery Well
~MW-1 Monitoring Well
~ W-23 Monitoring Well
Scale
(feet)
0 100
□
D
200
0
W-23
FCX-OU1
W-24
MW-110°
W-29
0
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
FIGURE2
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
....
RW7
....
RWB
llRA\loN
W-6
I
I
0
~-f-+---CITY STORM SEWER
0
W-25
DKS llA1E CES.ENG.
01/14/03
llA1E N'l'RCMD
llA1E w.o.No.
20064-133-100
DNG.NO.
Fig2.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
E
I
----
Shallow Wells
De[!th to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-1 47.25
MW-2 51.00
MW-3 50.80
MW-4 53.70
MW-5S 43.30
MW-6S 54.40
MW-7 53.00
MW-8 57.60
MW-9 45.20
MW-10 47.80
W-23 40.00
W-24 20.00
W-25 25.00
W-27 40.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
LEGEND
.A. RW-1 Recovery Well
~ MW-1 Monitoring Well (OU1)
912.65 Water Elevation (ft above msl)
~ W-23 Monitoring Well (OU3)
916.60 Water Elevation (ft above msl)
-· 924.0---Water Elevation lsocontour
-+ Groundwater Flow Direction
NA Not Applicable (Deep wells)
0
Notes:
Scale
(feet)
100
□
D
200
( 1) Water levels measured
April 23, 2002.
D
(2) NA = Not Applicable (Deep Wells)
(3) Groundwater flow patterns
are inconsistent due to effects
of pumping.
~--------__ 920-0--FCX ----
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
()
• W-24
; ~~911.87 MW-11
NA
W-29 NA~
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
..---------7
FCX • OU1
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHALLOW AQUIFER POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP
FIGURE 3
~
W-25
911.91
0
~
[WE DES. ENG.
OKS 01/14/03
[WE Al'fRCMD
[WE
I
W.O.NO.
20064-133-100
Dll,Q NO.
Fig3.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Degth to Bottom
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
Degth to Bottom
(ft. BTOC)
47.25
51.00
50.80
53.70
43.30
54.40
53.00
57.60
45.20
47.80
40.00
20.00
25.00
40.00
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-5D 123.90
MW-6D
MW-11
123.10
77.00
W-29 98.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
ns
nd
• RW-1
~MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
0.01
N
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Alpha-BHC Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Alpha-BHC Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Presumptive Evidence of presence of material
Inferred Extent of Alpha-BHC Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.01 ug/L
Inferred Extent of Alpha-BHC Contaminant (Deep)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.01 ug/L
D
□
D
ns
FCX -OU1
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ALPHA-BHC CONCENTRATION MAP
FIGURE4
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
0
~-------Je-+---CITY STORM SEWER
ORA'MI
Cl£OCED
~
W-25
nd
KNS
D'l1E DES.ENG>.
01/15/03
D'l1E APFRO\IED
D'l1E W.0.NO.
20064-133-100
DWG. NO.
Fig4.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Degth to Bottom
(ft. BTOC) Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
Degth to Bottom
(ft. BTOC)
47.25
51.00
50.80
53.70
43.30
54.40
53.00
57.60
45.20
47.80
40.00
20.00
25.00
40.00
MW-5D
MW-6D
MW-11
W-29
123.90
123.10
77.00
98.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
ns
nd
A RW-1
~MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
0.01
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Beta-BHC Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Beta-BHC Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Inferred Extent of Beta-BHC Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.01 ug/L
Inferred Extent of Beta-BHC Contaminant (Deep)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.01 ug/L
D
□
D
ns
FCX -OU1
W-24
ns
W-29
nd 0
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BETA-BHC CONCENTRATION MAP
FIGURE 5
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
.-TREATMENT SYSTEM
~
CITY STORM SEWER
DA1E DES. ENG.
KNS 01/15/03
DA1E ~
DA1E
I
W.O.NO,
20064-133-100
IMG.NO.
Fig5.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Degth tci Bottom Degth to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC) Well (fl. BTOC)
MW-5D 123.90
MW-1 47.25
MW-6D 123.10
MW-2 51.00 MW-11 77.00
MW-3 50.80 W-29 98.00
MW-4 53.70
MW-5S 43.30
MW-6S 54.40
MW-7 53.00
MW-8 57.60
MW-9 45.20
MW-10 47.80
W-23 40.00
W-24 20.00
W-25 25.00
W-27 40.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
ns
nd
.A. RW-1
~MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
0.01
J
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Gamma-BHC Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Gamma-BHC Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Gamma-BHC Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.027 ug/L
Inferred Extent of Gamma-BHC Contaminant (Deep)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.027 ug/L ·
D
□
D
~
0
M -4
nd
FCX-OU1
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
GAMMA-BHC CONCENTRATION MAP
FIGURE 6
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
-------1
0
~----J---+---CITY STORM SEWER
[WE DES.ENG.
KNS 01/15/03
[WE APf'RCNED
[WE
I
W.O.No.
20064-133-100
1:M'G.NO.
Fig6.CDR
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
De12th to Bottom
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
De12th to Bottom
(fl. BTOC)
47.25
51.00
50.80
53.70
43.30
54.40
53.00
57.60
45.20
47.80
40.00
20.00
25.00
40.00
Well (fl. BTOC)
MW-5D 123.90
MW-6D
MW-11
W-29
123.10
77.00
98.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
ns
nd
.... RW-1
~MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
0.01
J
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Gamm-chlordane Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Gamma-chlordane Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Gamma-chlordane Contaminant (Shalla
Above Remediation Goal of 0.027 ug/L
Inferred Extent of Gamma-chlordane Contaminant (Deep)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.027 ug/L
□
D
FCX
~)[) --
D ~~ D
J,,. V RW6
Q ~,,
0
W-23
ns
FCX-OU1
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
RW7"'
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
GAMMA-CHLORDANE CONCENTRATION MAP
CR,1/M,1
FIGURE 7
n
-6D
d I
~ I
.. •.
0
QJ
DtJE DES. ENG. DKS 01/15/03
DtJE APl'ROVEI>
DtJE w.o.NO.
20064-133-100
~NO.
Fig 7.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells
Degth to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-1 47.25
MW-2 51.00
MW-3 50.80
MW-4 53.70
MW-5S 43.30
MW-6S 54.40
MW-7 53.00
MW-8 57.60
MW-9 45.20
MW-10 47.80
W-23 40.00
W-24 20.00
W-25 25.00
W-27 40.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
Deep Wells
Degth to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-5D 123.90
MW-6D
MW-11
W-29
123.10
77.00
98.00
□
D
ns
nd
• RW-1
~MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
0.01
J
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
1, 1-Dichloroethane Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
1, 1-Dichloroethane Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of 1, 1-Dichloroethane Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 1 ug/L
Inferred Extent of 1, 1-Dichlorethane Contaminant (Deep)
Above Remediation Goal of 1 ug/L
D
ns
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
....
RWB
RW
-----/
FCX-OU1
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE (1, 1-DCA) CONCENTRATION MAP
CRAWN
FIGURE 8
I
0
W-25
nd
KNS
0
MJE DES. ENG.
01/15/03
MlE /!ffRCMD
MlE W.O.NO.
20064-133-100
c,,,G.NQ
Fig 8.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Degth to Bottom
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
Degth to Bottom
(ft. BTOC)
47.25
51.00
50.80
53.70
43.30
54.40
53.00
57.60
45.20
47.80
40.00
20.00
25.00
40.00
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-5D 123.90
MW-6D
MW-11
W-29
123.10
77.00
98.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
ns
nd
... RW-1
~MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
O.Q1
J
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU 1)
Chloroform Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Chloroform Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Chloroform Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.19 ug/L
Inferred Extent of Chloroform Contaminant (Deep)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.19 ug/L
D
□
D
ns
FCX-OU1
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CHLOROFORM CONCENTRATION MAP
FIGURE 9
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
-------1
KNS
J
MW-6D
4.5
D
~
DATE DES.e-lG. DATE
01/17/03
DATE APPROIIED
I
W.O.NO.
20064-133-100
c,,,,,a NO.
Fig9.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
De12th to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
De12th to Bottom
Well {ft. BTOC)
MW-5D 123.90 MW-1 47.25
MW-6D 123.10
MW-2 51.00 MW-11 77.00
MW-3 50.80 W-29 98.00
MW-4 53.70
MW-5S 43.30
MW-6S 54.40
MW-7 53.00
MW-8 57.60
MW-9 45.20
MW-10 47.80
W-23 40.00
W-24 20.00
W-25 25.00
W-27 40.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
ns
nd
A RW-1
-0-MW-1 0.01
-0-W-23 0.01
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU 1)
Tetrachloroethene Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Tetrachloroethene Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Inferred Extent of Tetrachloroethene Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.7 ug/L
Inferred Extent of Tetrachloroethene Contaminant (Deep)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.7 ug/L
D
□
D
ns
FCX -OU1
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TERTACHLOROETHENE (PCE) CONCENTRATION MAP
FIGURE 10
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
llRA'MI
Cl£OaD
I
I
0
W-25
nd
KNS
D"(IE DES. ENG. [WE
01/17/03
D"(IE APPRCMO
I
W.O.No.
20064-133-100
CMG.NO.
Fig 10.CDR
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
DeRth to Bottom DeRth to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC) Well (fl. BTOC)
MW-5D 123.90
MW-1 47.25
MW-6D 123.10
MW-2 51.00 MW-11 77.00
MW-3 50.80 W-29 98.00
MW-4 53.70
MW-5S 43.30
MW--6S 54.40
MW-7 53.00
MW--8 57.60
MW-9 45.20
MW-10 47.80
W-23 40.00
W-24 20.00
W-25 25.00
W-27 40.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
ns
nd
... RW-1
~MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
0.01
J
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Trichloroethene Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Trichloroethene Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Trichloroethene Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 2.8 ug/L
Inferred Extent of Trichloroethene Contaminant (Deep)
Above Remediation Goal of 2.8 ug/L
D
□
D
ns
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
FCX-OU1
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NOR CAROLINA -------
TRICHLOROETHENE (TCE) CONCENTRATION MAP
OIIA\IN
FIGURE 11 OECICED
0
[WE DES. ENG>.
OKS 01/17/03
[WE Aff'ROIIED
[WE
I
w.o. NO.
20064--133-100
CM'G.NO.
Fig 11.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
Shallow Wells
De1:1th to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-1 47.25
MW-2 51.00
MW-3 50.80
MW-4 53.70
MW-5S 43.30
MW-6S 54.40
MW-7 53.00
MW-8 57.60
MW-9 45.20
MW-10 47.80
W-23 40.00
W-24 20.00
W-25 25.00
W-27 40.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
Deep Wells
De1:1th to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-5D 123.90
MW-6D
MW-11
123.10
77.00
W-29 98.00
□
D
ns
nd
A RW-1
~MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
0.01
J
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Bis(2-ethyfhexfy) Phthafate Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (Ou3)
Bis(2-ethylhexfy) Phthalate Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Bis(2-ethyfhexly) Phthafate Contaminant
(Shallow) Above Remediation Goal of 6 ug/L
Inferred Extent of Bis(2-ethyfhexfy) Phthafate Contaminant
(Deep) Above Remediation Goal of 6 ug/L
D
0
W-23
ns
FCX -OU1
W-24 MW-1100 ns
nd
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthafate
FIGURE 12
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
I
I
D '----~-+---CITY STORM SEWER
-----1
DATE DES. ENG.
KNS 01/17/03
CHCICB) DATE A/'l'RCMD
W.O.NO.
20064-133-100
CM'G.NO.
Fig 12.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
Degth to Bottom
(ft. BTOC)
47.25
51.00
50.80
53.70
43.30
54.40
53.00
57.60
45.20
47.80
40.00
20.00
25.00
40.00
Degth to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-5D 123.90
MW-6D
MW-11
W-29
123.10
77.00
98.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
ns
nd
A RW-1
~MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
0.01
J
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
Well was dry, not sampled
200
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Chromium Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Chromium Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Chromium Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 50 ug/L
D
□
D
~
W-23
ns
FCX -OU1
4 • RW7.1. RW5 .._
RW6
W-24
~~ ns
MW-11
nd
W-29
nd~
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CHROMIUM CONCENTRATION MAP
FIGURE 13
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
...
RW8
KNS
0
CWE DES. ENG.
01/17/03
CWE N'l'RCMD
DA1E
I
W.O.NO.
20064-133-100
D'M3.NO.
Fig 13.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
Degth to Bottom
(ft. BTOC)
47.25
51.00
50.80
53.70
43.30
54.40
53.00
57.60
45.20
47.80
40.00
20.00
25.00
40.00
Degth to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-5D 123.90
MW-6D
MW-11
W-29
123.10
77.00
98.00
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
ns
nd
.& RW-1
~MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
0.01
J
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU 1)
Manganese Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Manganese Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Manganese Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 50 ug/L
Inferred Extent of Manganese Contaminant (Deep)
Above Remediation Goal of 50 ug/L
D
□
D
FCX -OU1
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MANGANESE CONCENTRATION MAP
FIGURE 14
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
----/
KNS
I
I
C:::;
!:WE DES.ENG.
01/17/03
!:WE Al'l'RCMD
W.0.No.
20064--133-100
CMG.NO.
Fig I4.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.A. RW-1
~MW-1
~W-23
, ----.. .. ----
-71.0 -
□
D
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
0
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
/
r----,
I ' I V/
I I I ,-----, I !_I I I i
I I I
I I
I ' I I I I I
I I
' ! I I I , -0
I I
~ --.,
b
i I I I I
I I
I I I I
II I
Scale
(feet)
100
'
'
' '
'
200
BURLINGTON
. INDUSTRIES
--
FCX-OU1
• • • •
,•
'
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on May 2002 Flow Meter Data
FIGURE 15
®
~ DATE DES. ENG. OKS 01/17/03
DATE AffRCMD
DATE W.O.No.
20064-133-100
CMG.NO.
Fig 15.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A RW-1
.q,.MW-1
.q,. W-23
.. --.. , -' .. --...
-71.0 -
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
□
I I
/
vi
I I
D I I I I I ' I I I I I
I I ' -0 I ~ ..._,
I 0 I '
I
Scale
(feet)
• •
~
0 100 200
• • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • •
•
BURLINGTON
IND
-
FCX -OU1
-
/
• • •
915.0
0 '
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on June 2002 Flow Meter Data
FIGURE 16
®
DRAY.ti DAJE DES. ENG. DKS 01/17/03
DAJE Afl'RCMD
CWE W,0.NO.
20064-133-100
C1M3.NO.
Fig 16.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.A. RW-1
~MW-1
~ W-23
---.. , -_____ ...
-71.0 -
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
D
□
i I
D i I I I
I I
I
I
I I I
0
I j ' I
I ' ' !
-0 --.J
0
'
Scale
(feet)
100 200
"' MW-11
-
BURLINGTON
INDUSlRIES
W-24
FCX -OU1
-
I
-
, , ,
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on July 2002 Flow Meter Data
FIGURE 17
®
CWE DES. ENG. DKS 01/17/03
CWE APl'RCNED
CWE w.o. NO.
20064-133-100
tN,G.NO.
Fig 17.CDR
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
I
I
I
I
I
.A. RW-1
~MW-1
~ W-23
----, -----...
-71.0 -
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
01
□
I
I I
I
Scale
(feet)
0 100
-0 ~ ......
0
. /
• • •
200
• • • • • • • • • • • •
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
, . q\\, <v/" ~
G/
FCX-OU1
I
,
• • I
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on August 2002 Flow Meter Data
FIGURE 18
®
CWE DES. ENS.
OKS 01/17/03
CWE Aff'RO,/ED
W.O.No.
20064-133-100
DNG. NO.
Fig 18.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
A RW-1
~ MW-1
~ W-23
........ , -' -.... .
-71.0 -
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
□
D
Scale
(feet)
0 100
'
200
' '
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES ~>-<'::::::::=::=::=~ 916.0 ,-.f--_.___/ -I
()
W-2
,i-+
MW-11
, .
• 0 •
' •
12.Q-,.,c.__~~
~,
FCX -OU1
"' W-25 '
•
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on September 2002 Flow Meter Data
FIGURE 19
J
®
llAA'MI [WE DES. ENG.
DKS 01/19/02
O£CICB'.) [WE APPRCMD
W,0.NO.
20064-133-100
DWG.NO.
Fig 19.CDR
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
A. RW-1
~MW-1
~ W-23
----# -... --.....
-71.0 -
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
□
D
I
I u
□I
i I I I II I _l----'C----
1 I
I II
/ I
I I
I I
I I
I
\
Scale
(feet)
~
0 100 200
FCX-OU1
• • •
I I
I
es :o
0
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on October 2002 Flow Meter Data
FIGURE20
®
llAA1MI DATE DES. ENG.
OKS 01/19/03
Cl£Cl<ED DATE N'l'RCMD
W.O.No.
20064-133-100
CMG.NO.
Fig20.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A RW-1
~ MW-1
~ W-23
.. ---, -..... --..
-71.0 -
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
I I I
□ I I ;1
D /I I
I
Scale
(feet)
0 100
•
• •
200
• •
• • • • • • • • • • • •
()
BURLINGTON
IND ,.
/' / '"' ·' /' ~.· s;
. -911.0 -,<'<,·~
,,/"
~//'v .P_,. .J ·0 W-24
~,I'
MW-l1
•
--W-29 ,I' / ./ ----
FCX-OU1
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on Average Flow Meter Data from May 2002 through October 2002
FIGURE 21
®
~
ORAlMI DA1E DES. ENG. DA1E
OKS 01/19/03
DA1E AffRCMD
w.o. NO.
20064-133-100
DYl/0. NO.
Fig2I.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
Meter ID Date: 7-May 14-May
:Effluent 522,496.00 530,755.80
iRW-1 442,099.83 444,629.22
iRW-2 142,853.82 143,321.82
~W-3 77,966.25 78,566.60
"W-4 158,993.90 159,635.82
RW-5 216,951.60 218,034.25
RW-6 197,605.93 198,554.15
RW-7 259,587.53 259,684.10
RW-8 493,817.17 496,228.82
:RW-9 86,8!0.72 87,228.25
IRW-10 138,674.38 139,338.02
tEffiuent 248.60 8,259.80
RW-1 63.56 2,529.39
RW-2 28.07 468.00
RW-3 3.48 600.35
RW-4 35.75 641.92
RW-5 45.00 1,082.65
RW-6 37.06 948.22
RW-7 15.97 96.57
RW-8 56.90 2,411.65
RW-9 27.70 417.53
RW-10 37.36 663.64
Total Influent 350.85 9,859.92
Variance 102.25 1,600.12
Days E1apsed 6.00 7.00
Average Daily Effluent 41.43 1.179.97
Average Daily Influent 58.47 1,408.56
Average Daily CFM O.oJ 0.82
RW-1 DailyCFM 0.007 0.251
RW-2 DailyCfM 0.003 0.046
RW-3 DailyCFM 0.000 0.060
RW-4 DailyCFM 0.004 0.064
RW-5 Daily CFM 0.005 0.107
RW-6 DailyCFM 0.004 0.094
RW-7 Daily CFM 0.002 0.010
RW-8 Daily CFM 0.007 0.239
RW-9 Daily CfM 0.003 0.041
RW~ JO Daily CFM 0.004 0.066
Total Daily Influent CFM 0.041 0.978
Notes: Vllriancc is cqlllll 10 Total lnflurnt minus Effioeni
RW -.Rccow:ry Well
System down on 5/1/02
ITTC = Unabk ID calcul.uc
Blllllk spaces indic.uc n:ading not recorded
k..__-.1~200:lRo+x>,L «Q-.blo T.tii.&
24-May 29-May 4-Jun I 12-Jun
556,235.14 563,177.IO 578,115.40 585,430.08
451,940.00 453,967.50 458,495.32 460,600.45
144,363.51 144,674.72 146,049.05 146,476.82
79,977.48 80,372.45 81,169.90 81,610.69
161,164.38 16l,.588.52 162,422.58 162,898.78
220,967.94 221,789.82 223,523.58 224,444.56
201,486.71 202,150.63 203,438.75 205,158.62
262,332.08 263,072.98 264,602.87 265,414.08
504,499.00 510,414.08
88,216.38 88,492.82 89,072.08 89,367.80
140,914.07 141,347.92 142,225.15 142,668.87
25,479.34 6,941.96 14,938.30 7,314.68
7,310.78 2,027.50 4,527.82 2,!05.13
1,041.69 311.21 1,374.33 427.77
1,4!0.88 394.97 797.45 440.79
1,528.56 424.14 834.06 476.20
2,933.69 821.88 1,733.76 920.98
2,932.56 663.92 1,288.12 1,719.87
2,647.98 740.90 1,529.89 811.21
!ITC 8,270.18 !ITC 5,915.08
988.13 276.44 579.26 295.72
1,576.05 433.85 877.23 443.72
22,370.32 14,364.99 13,541.92 13,556.47
-3,109.02 7,423.03 -1,396.38 6,241.79
JO.OD 5.00 5.00 8.00
2,547.93 1,388.39 2,987.66 914.33
2,237.03 2,873.00 2,708.38 1,694.56
J.77 0.96 2.07 0.63
0.508 0.282 0.629 0.183
0.072 0.043 0.191 0.037
0.098 0.055 0.1 ]I 0.038
0.106 0.059 0.116 0.041
0.204 0.114 0.241 0.080
0.204 0.092 0.179 0.149
0.184 0.103 0.212 0.070
!ITC 1.149 !ITC 0.513
0.069 0.038 0.080 0.026
0.109 0.060 0.122 0.039
1.553 J.995 1.881 1.177
17-Jun 28-Jun I 3-Jul
597,041.50 606,658.33 611,395.68
464,185.20 467,229.93 468,487.79
147,122.37 147,635.30 147,911.04
82,249.68 82,757.47 83,020.27
163,624.38 164,165.00 164,456.58
225,885.28 227,109.41 227,706.84
207,593.92 209,823.12 216,529.85
266,747.12 267,742.64 268,269.85
89,833.90 90,199.76 90,403.39
143,344.82 143,887.34 144.217.02
11,611.42 9,616.83 4,737.35
3,584.75 3,044.73 1,257.86
645.55 512.93 275.74
638.99 507.79 262.80
725.60 540.62 291.58
1,440.72 1,224.13 597.43
2,435.30 2,229.20 6,706.73
1,333.04 995.52 527.21
!ITC !ITC !ITC
466.10 365.86 203.63
675.95 542.52 329.68
11,946.00 9,963.30 10,452.66
334.58 346.47 5,715.31
5.00 11.00 5.00
2,322.28 874.26 947.47
2,389.20 905.75 2,090.53
1.61 0.61 0.66
0.498 0.192 0.175
0.090 0.032 0.038
0.089 0.032 0.037
O.l01 0.034 0.040
0.200 0.077 0.083
0.338 0.141 0.931
0.185 0.063 0.073
!ITC !ITC !ITC
0.065 0.023 0.028
0.094 0.034 0.046
1.659 0.629 l.452
Table 6
Reconry Well Flow Meter Readings (cubic red)
May 2002 • November 2002
FCX • Stat.tsville 001
Meter Readings (cubic feet)
8-Jul IS-Jul 26-Jul 29-Jul 6-Aug
628,635.27 652,464.50 657,666.70 674,073.70
468,499.32 473,603.32 481,376.98 483,161.92 488,609.85
147,918.50 148,903.25 150,200.38 150,497.64 151,412.01
83,028.47 83,950.67 85,246.40 85,540.92 86,417.42
164,464.23 165,529.87 166,939.90 167,253.54 168,214.09
227,713.02 229,784.02 232,555.30 233,165.00 235,052.80
216,535.00 228,617.02 238,242.25 239,594.90 243,811.90
268,279.70 270,456.02 272,726.52 273,369.13 275,101.01
517,308.24 521,904.00 526,423.02 529,031.23
90,4()1).32 91,121.02 92,030.85 92,230.97 92,850.27
144,225.72 145,259.35 146,617.72 146,921.43 147,857.72
!ITC 17,239.59 23,829.23 5,202.20 16,407.00
11.53 5,104.00 7,773.66 1,784.94 5,447.93
7.46 984.75 1,297.13 297.26 914.37
8.20 922.20 1,295.73 294.52 876.50
7.65 1,065.64 1,410.03 313.64 960.55
6.18 2,071.00 2,771.28 609.70 1,887.80
5.15 12,082.02 9,625.23 1,352.65 4.217.00
9.85 2,176.32 2,270.50 642.61 1,731.88
6,894.16 4,595.76 4,519.02 2,608.21 !ITC
5.93 711.70 909.83 200.12 619.30
8.70 1,033.63 1,35837 303.71 936.29
6,964.81 30,747.02 33,230.78 8,407.36 17,591.62
!ITC 13,507.43 9,401.55 3,205.16 1,184.62
5.00 7.00 II.OD 3.00 7.00
!ITC 2,462.80 2,166.29 1,734.07 2,343.86
1,392.96 4,392.43 3,020.98 2,802.45 2.513.09
!ITC 1.71 1.50 1.20 1.63
0.002 0.506 0.491 0.413 0.540
0.{XH 0.098 0.082 0.069 0.091
0.001 0.091 0.082 0.068 0.087
0.001 0.106 0.089 0,073 0.095
0.001 0.205 0.175 0.141 0.187
0.001 1.199 0.608 0.313 0.418
0.001 0.216 0.143 0.149 0.172
0.958 0.456 0.285 0.604 !ITC
0.001 0.071 0.057 0.046 0.061
0.001 0.103 0.086 0.070 0.093
0.967 3.050 2.098 1.946 l.745
Pagel of I
' ' I IS-Aug I 23-Aug I 30-Aug 6-Sep 13-Scp 19-Sep 24-S<p 4-0ct I JO-Oct 22-0ct I-Nov
'
691,972.34 720,195.83 721,079.30 722,184.24 746,292.05 757,186.24 765,811.82 784,216.85 797,616.85 804,970.85 812,324.7(
494,295.76 499.583.70 503,840.62 504,823.56 512,411.90 516,153.26 519,163.20 525,055.40 528,755.56 532,517.39 534,751.Sfi
152,198.35 153,108.61 154,060.43 154,900.22 155,537.39 156,342.26 156,886.40 158,125.00 163,636.35 169,198.32 183,908.62
87,304.89 88,125.54 88,826.80 89.602.15 90,168.62 90,737.60 91,190.90 92,070.95 92,920.25 93,174.16 93,.553.l~
169,199.38 169,876.32 170,844.65 171,765.08 172,310.52 172,978.36 173,494.08 174,570.42 175.220.28 175,886.39 176,314.25
235,793.76 236,489.20 240,296.50 241,153.90 243,233.26 244,548.89 245,595.32 247,711.15 249,129.27 250,537.80 251,467.IC
248,264.34 252,591.13 255,855.70 256,901.23 262,878.15 266,029.68 268,551.23 273,557.75 281,202.89 288,642.20 300,931.40
275,704.06 276,403.20 280,111.32 281,602.31 282,859.65 284,073.95 285,042.15 286,968.22 288,231.80 289,527.20 290,420.92
558,470.01 563,090.26 565,790.25 568,844.00 570,627.75
93,480.30 93,957.11 94,521.05 95,263.88 95,463.69 95,878.46 96,210.82 96,893.32 97,382.50 97,728.86 98,053.98
148,624.80 149,302.08 150,399.10 151,086.12 152,028.05 152,760.33 153,337.82 154,480.28 155,206.13 155,918.20 156,419.77
17,898.64 28,223.49 883.47 1,104.94 24,107.81 10,894.19 8,625.58 18,405.03 13,400.00 7,354.00 7,353.85
5,685.91 5,287.94 4.256.92 982.94 7,588.34 · 3,741.36 3,009.94 5,892.20 3,700.16 3,761.83 2,234.49
786.34 910.26 951.82 839.79 637.17 \ 804.87 544.14 1,238.60 5,511.35 5,561.97 14,710.30
887.47 820.65 701.26 775.35 566.47 I 568.98 453.30 880.05 849.30 253.91 379.02
985.29 676.94 968.33 920.43 545.44 667.84 515.72 1,076.34 649.86 666.11 427.86
740.96 695.44 3,807.30 857.40 2,079.36 1,315.63 1,046.43 2,115.83 1,418.12 1,408.53 929.30
4,452.44 4,326.79 3,264.57 l,M5.53 5,976.92 3,151.53 2,521.55 5,006.52 7,645.14 7,439.31 12,289.20
603.05 699.14 3,708.12 1,490.99 1,257.34 1,214.30 968.20 1,926.07 1,263.58 1.295.40 893.72
!ITC !ITC !ITC !ITC !ITC !ITC 29,438.78 4,620.25 2,699.99 3,053.75 1,783.75
630.03 476.81 563.94 742.83 199.81 j414.77 332.36 682.50 489.18 346.36 325.1'
767.08 677.28 1,097.02 687.02 941.93 I 732.28 577.49 1,142.46 725.85 712.07 50l.5i
15.538.57 14,571.25 19,319.28 8,342.28 19,792.78 12,611.56 39,407.91 24,580.82 24,952.53 24,499.24 34,474.3,
-2,360.07 -13,652.24 18,435.81 7,237.34 -4,315.03 1,717.37 30,782.33 6,175.791 11,552.531 17,145.24 27,120.4~
9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 10.00 6.00 12.00 9.0C
1,988.74 3,527.94 126.21 184.16 3,443.97 1,815.70 1,725.12 1,840.50 2,233.33 612.83 817.09
1,726.51 1,821.41 2,759.90 1,390.38 2,827.54 2,101.93 7,881.58 2,458.08 4,158.76 2,041.60 3,830.~
1.38 2.45 0.09 0.13 2.39 1.26 1.20 1.28 1.55 0.43 0.57
0.439 0.459 0.422 0.114 0.753 0.433 0.418 0.409 0.428 0.218 0.172
0.061 0.079 0.094 0.097 0.063 0.093 0.076 0.086 0.638 0.322 J.135
0.068 0.071 0.070 0.090 0.056 0.066 0.063 0.061 0.098 O.ot5 0.029
0.076 0.059 0.096 0.107 0.054 0.077 0.072 0.075 0.075 0.039 0.033
0.057 0.060 0.378 0.099 0.206 0.152 0.145 0.147 0.164 0.082 0.072
0.344 0.376 0.324 0.121 0.593 0.365 0.350 0.348 0.885 0.431 0.948
0.047 0.061 0.368 0.173 0.125 0.141 0.134 0.134 0.146 0.075 0.069
!ITC !ITC !ITC !ITC !ITC !ITC 0372 0.321 0.312 0.177 0.138
0.049 0.041 0.056 0.086 0.020 0.048 0.046 0.047 0.057 0.020 0.025
0.059 0.059 0.109 0.080 0.093 0.085 0.080 0.079 0.084 0.041 0.039
1.199 1.265 l.917 0.966 1.964 1.460 1.756 1.707 2.888 1.418 2.660
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ii
I
I
I
I
!Meter ID Date: 7-May 14-May 24-May
IEmuent 3,908,270.08 3,970,053.38 4,160,638.85
IRw.1 3,306,906.73 3,325,826.57
IRW-2 1,068,546.57 1,072,047.21
IRW-3 583,187.55 587,678.17
W-4 1,189,274.37 I ,I 94,075.93
W-5 1,622,797.97 1,630,896.19
W-6 1,478,cm.36 1,485,185.04
RW-7 1,941,714.72 1,942,437.07
RW-8 3,693,752.43 3,711,791.57
RW-9 649,344.19 652,467.3)
RW-10 1,037,284.36 1,042,248.39
F.ffluent 1,859.53 61,783.30
RW-1 475.43 18,919.84
RW-2· 209.96 3,500.64
RW-3 26.03 4,490.62
RW-4 267.41 4,801.56
RW-5 336.60 8,098.22
RW-6 m.21 7,092.69
RW-7 119.46 722.34
RW-8 425.61 18,039.14
RW-9 207.20 3,123.12
RW-10 279.45 4,964.03
tr otal Influent 2,624.36 73,752.20
fVariancc 764.83 11,968.90
!Days Elapsed 6.00 7.00
IAveragc Daily Effluent 309.92 8,826.19
!Average Daily Influent 437.39 J0,536.03
A veragc Daily Effluent GPM 0.22 6.13
IRW-1 Daily GPM 0.06 J.88
IRW-2 Daily GPM o.oz 0.35
IRW-3 Daily GPM 0.00 0.45
IRW-4 Daily GPM O.QJ 0.48
IRW-5 Daily GPM 0.04 0.80
IRW-6 Daily GPM O.QJ 0.70
W-7 Daily GPM 0.01 0.07
IRW-8 Daily GPM 0.05 1.79
IRW-9 Daily GPM o.oz 0.31
IRW-JODailyGPM 0.03 0.49
otal Daily 1nf1uenl. GPM 0.30 7.32
Notes: VariaDce is c,qua.l to Total lnflue.111 milw Effiuellll
RW-~WeD
Sys11:m down oo snm
urc = Ufl&ble 10 calcuwe
Bb.llt spaca iooicatc IQWfl& not m:orded
3,380,511.20
1,079,839.05
598,231.55
1,205,509.56
1,652,840.19
1,507, I 20.59
1,962,243.96
659,858.52
1,054,037.24
190.585.46
54,684.63
7,791.84
J0,553.38
11,433.63
21,944.00
21,935.55
19,806.89
lITC
7,391.21
11,788.85
167,329.99
-23,255.47
10.00
19,058.55
16,733.00
13.24
'·"" 0.54
0.73
0.79
1.52
1.52
1.38
UTC
0.51
0.82
11.62
29-May 4-Jun 12-Jun 17-Jun ZS.Jun 3-Jul
4,212,564.71 4,324,303.19 4,379,017.00 4,465,870.42 4,537,804.31 4,573,239.69
3,395,676.90 3,429,544.99 3,445,291.37 3,472,105.30 3,494,879.88 3,504,288.67
1,082,166.91 1,092,446.89 1,095,646.61 1,100,475.33 1,104,312.04 1,106,374.58
601,185.93 607,150.85 610,447.96 615,227.61 619,025.88 620,991.62
1,208,682.13 1,214,920.90 1,218,482.87 1,223,910.36 1,227,954.20 1,230,135.22
1,658,987.85 1,671,956.38 1,678,845.3 I 1,689,621.89 1,698,778.39 1,703,247.16
1,512,086.71 1,521,721.85 1,534,586.48 1,552,802.52 1,569,476.94 1,619,643.28
1,967,785.89 1,979,229.47 1,985,297.32 1,995,268.46 2,002,714.95 2,006,658.48
3,773,652.52 3,817,897.32
661,926.29 666,259.16 668,471.14 671.957.57 674,694.20 676,217.36
1,057,282.44 1,063,844.12 1,067,163.15 1,072,219.25 1,076,277.30 1,078,743.31
51,925.86 111,738.48 54,713.81 86,853.42 71,933.89 35.435.38
15,165.70 33,868.09 15,746.37 26,813.93 22,774.58 9,408.79
2,327.85 10,279.99 3,199.72 4,828.71 3,836.72 2,062.54
2,954.38 5,964.93 3,297.11 4,779.65 3,798.27 1,965.74
3,172.57 6,238.77 3,561.98 5,427.49 4,043.84 2,181.02
6,147.66 12,%8.52 6,888.93 10,776.59 9,156.49 4,468.78
4,966.12 9,635.14 12,864.63 18,216.04 16,674.42 50,166.34
5,541.93 11,443.58 6,067.85 9,971.14 7,446.49 3,943.53
30,930.47 lITC 22,122.40 lITC lITC lITC
2,067.77 4,332.86 2,211.99 3,486.43 2,736.63 1,523.15
3,245.20 6,561.68 3,319.03 5,056.11 4,058.05 2,466.01
76,519.65 101,293.56 79,280.00 89,356.08 74,525.48 78,185.90
24,593.79 -10,444.92 24,566.19 2,502.66 2,591.60 42,750.52
5.00 5.00 8.00 5.00 11.00 5.00
10,385.17 22,347.70 6,839.23 17,370.68 6,539.44 7,087.08
15,303.93 20,258.71 9,910.00 17,871.22 6,TI5.04 15,637.18
7.21 15.52 4.75 1206 4.54 4.92
211 4.70 1.37 3.72 1.44 1.31
0.32 1.43 0.28 0.67 0.24 0.29
0.41 0.83 0.29 0.66 0.24 0.27
0.44 0.87 0.31 0.75 0.26 0.30
0.85 1.80 0.60 1.50 0.58 0.62
0.69 1.34 1.12 2.53 1.05 6.97
o.n 1.59 0.53 1.38 0.47 0.55
4.30 UTC 1.92 lITC UTC lITC
0.29 0.60 0.19 0.48 0.17 0.21
0.45 0.91 0.29 0.70 0.26 0.34
10.63 14.07 6.88 12.41 4.70 I0.86
Tablt•7
Recovery WeU Flow Meter Readings (gallons)
May 2002 -Nol'embcr 2002
FCX -Statesville OUl
Meter Rieadings (galloos)
8-Jul 15-Jul 2~Jul 29-Jul 6-Aug
4,702,191.82 4,880,434.46 4,919,346.92 5,042,071.28
3,50U74.91 3,542,552.83 3,600,699.81 3,614,051.16 3,654,801.68
1,106,430.38 1,113,796.3) 1,123,498.84 1,125,722.35 1,132,561.83
621,052.96 627,951.01 637,643.07 639,846.08 646,402.30
1,230,192.44 1,238,163.43 1,248,710.45 1,251,056.48 1,258,241.39
1,703,293.39 1,718,784.47 1,739,513.64 1,744,074.20 1,758,194.94
1,619,681.80 1,7!0,055.31 1,782,052.03 1,792.169.85 1,823,713.01
2,006,732.16 2,023,011.03 2,039,994.37 2,0W,801.09 2,057,755.55
3,869,465.64 3,903,841.92 3,937,644.19 3,957,153.60
676,261.71 681,585.23 688,390.76 689,887.66 694,520.02
1,078,808.39 1,086,539.94 1,096,700.55 1,098,972.30 1,105,975.75
.
lITC 128,952.13 178,2_42.64 38,912.46 122,724.36
86.24 38,JTT.92 58,146.98 13,351.35 40,750.52
55.80 7,365.93 9,702.53 2,223.50 6,839.49
61.34 6,898.06 9,692.06 2,203.01 6,556.22
57.22 7,970.99 10,547.02 2,346.03 7,184.91
46.23 15,491.08 20,729.17 4,560.56 14,120.74
38.52 90,373.51 71,996.72 J0,117.82 31,543.16
73.68 16,278.87 16,983.34 4,806.72 12,954.46
12,892.08 34,376.28 33,802.27 19,509.41 lITC
44.36 5,323.52 6,805.53 1,496.90 4,632.36
65.08 7,731.55 10,160.61 2,271.75 7,003.45
13,420.54 229,987.71 248,566.23 62,887.05 131,585.32
lITC 101,035.58 70,323.59 23,974.60 8,860.96
5.00 7.00 11.00 3.00 7.00
lITC 18,421.73 16,203.88 12,970.82 17,532.05
2,684.1 I 32,855.39 22,596.93 20,962.35 18,797.90
lITC 12.79 11.25 9.01 12.18
0.01 3.79 3.67 3.09 4.04
0.01 0.73 0.61 0.51 0.68
0.01 0.68 0.61 0.51 0.65
0.01 0.79 0.67 0.54 0.71
0.01 1.54 1.31 1.06 1.40
0.01 8.97 4.55 2.34 3.13
0.01 1.61 1.07 J.11 1.29
1.79 3.41 2.13 4.52 UTC
0.01 0.53 0.43 0.35 0.46
O.Ol o.n 0.64 0.53 0.69
1.86 22.82 15.69 14.56 13.05
f'arclofl
IS-Aug 23-Aug JO.Aug
5,175,953.10 5,387,064.81 5,393,673.16
3,6'77,332.28 3,736,886.08 3,768,727.84
1.138,443.66 1,145,252.40 1,152,372.02
653,040.58 659,179.04 664,424.46
1,265,611.36 1,270,674.87 1,277,917.98
1,763,737.32 1,768,939.22 1,797,417.82
1,857,017.26 1,889,381.65 1,913,800.64
2,062,266.37 2,067,495.94 2,095,232.67
699,232.64 702,799.18 707,017.45
1,111,713.50 1,116,779.56 1,124,985.27
133,881.83 211,111.71 6,608.36
42,530.61 39,553.79 31,841.76
5,881.82 6,808.74 7,119.61
6,638.28 6,138.46 5,245.42
7,369.97 5,063.51 7,243.11
5,542.38 5,201.89 28,478.60
33,304.25 32,364.39 24,418.98
4,510.81 5,229.57 27,736.74
lITC lITC lITC
4,712.62 3,566.54 4,218.27
5,737.76 5,066.05 8,205.71
116,228.50 108,992.95 144,508.21
-17,653.32 -102,118.76 137,899.86
9.00 8.00 7.00
14,875.76 26,388.96 944.05
12,914.28 13,624.12 20,644.03
10.33 18.33 0.66
3.28 3.43 3.16
0.45 0.59 0.71
0.51 0.53 0.52
0.57 0.44 0.72
0.43 0.45 283
2.57 2.81 242
0.35 0.45 275
UTC UTC UTC
0.36 0.31 0.42
0.44 0.44 0.81
8.97 9.46 14.34
6-S<p 13-Sep 19-Sep 24-S<p 4-0ct JO-Oct 22-0ct I-Nov
5,401,938.12 5.582,264.53 5,663,753.08 5,728.272.41 5,865,942.04 5,966,174.04 6,021,181.96 6,076,188.71
3,776,080.23 3,832,841.01 3,860,826.38 3,883,340.74 3,9Z7,414.39 3,955,091.59 3,983,230.08 3,999,944.flt
1, I 58,653.65 1,163,419.68 1,169,440.10 1,173,510.27 1,182,775.00 1,223,999.90 1,265,603.43 1,375,636.41'
670,224.08 674,461.28 678,717.25 682,107.93 688,690.71 695,043.47 696,942.72 {IJ9,m.1s
1,284,802.80 I ,288,882.69 1,293,878.13 1,297,735.72 1,305,786.74 l,3!0,647.69 1,315,630.20 1,318,830.55
1,803,831.17 1,819,384.78 1,829,225.70 1,837 .052.99 1,852,879.40 1,863,486.94 1,874,022.74 1,880,973.91
1,921,621.20 1,966,328.56 1,989,902.01 2,008,763.20 2,046,211.97 2,103,397.62 2,159,043.66 2,250,966.8;
2,106,385.28 2,115,790.18 2,124,873.15 2,132,115.28 2,146,522.29 2,155,973.86 2,165,663.46 2,172,348. 4J;
4,177,355.67 4,211,915.14 4,232, 11 I .07 4,254,953.12 4,268,295.57
712,573.82 714,068.40 717,170.88 719,656.93 724,762.03 728,421.10 731,0ll.87 733,443.Ji
1,130,124.18 1,137,169.81 1,142,647.27 1,146,966.89 1,155,512.49 1,160,941.85 1,166,268.14 1,170,019.~
8,264.95 180,326.42 81,488.54 64,519.34 137,669.62 100,232.00 55,007.92 55,006.SC
7,352.39 56,760.78 27,985.37 22,514.35 44,073.66 27,677.20 28,138.49 16,713,Qo
6,281.63 4,766.03 6,020.43 4,070.17 9,264.73 41,224.90 41,603.54 110,033.04
5,799.62 4,237.20 4,255.97 3,390.68 6,582.77 6,352.76 1,899.25 2,835.07
6,884.82 4,079.89 4,995.44 3,857.59 8,051.02 4,860.95 4,982.50 3,200.3
6,413.35 15,553.61 9,840.91 7,827.30 15,826.41 10,607.54 10,535.80 6,951.lf
7,820.56 44,707.36 23,573.44 18,861.19 37,448.77 57,185.65 55,646.04 91.923.2.<
11,152.61 9,404.90 9,082.96 7,242.14 14,407.00 9,451.58 9,689.59 6,685.03
lITC UTC lITC 27,525.26 34,559.47 20,195.93 22,842.05 13,342.45
5,556.37 1,494.58 3,102.48 2,486.05 5,105.10 3,659.07 2,590.77 2,431.9l
5,138.91 7,045.64 5,477.45 4,319.63 8,545.60 5,429.36 5,326.28 3,751.7.q
62,400.25 148,049.99 94,334.47 102,094.35 183,864.53 186,644.92 183,254.32 257,867.~
54,135.30 -32,276.42 12,845.93 37,575.01 46,194.91 86,41292 128,246.40 202,861.1'
6.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 10.00 6.00 12.00 9."
1,377.49 25,760.92 13,581.42 12,903.87 13,766.96 16,705.33 4,583.99 6,111.8'
10,400.04 21,150.00 15,72241 20,418.87 18,386.45 31,107.49 15,271.19 28,652.fX
0.96 17.89 9.43 8.96 9.56 11.60 3.18 4.2<
0.85 5.63 3.24 3.13 3.06 3.20 1.63 1.2'
0.73 0.47 0.70 0.57 0.64 4.TT 241 8.4'
0.67 0.42 0.49 0.47 0.46 0.74 0.11 0.2
0.80 0.40 0.58 0.54 0.56 0.56 0.29 0.2'
0.74 1.54 1.14 1.09 1.10 1.23 0.61 0.5'
0.91 4.44 2.73 2.62 2.60 6.62 3.22 7.0
1.29 0.93 1.05 1.01 1.00 1.09 0.56 OS
UTC UTC UTC 0.35 2.40 234 1.32 LU,
0.64 0.15 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.42 0.15 0.1
0.59 0.70 0.63 0.60 0.59 0.63 0.31 0.2'
7.22 14.69 10.92 10.70 12.77 21.60 10.60 19.9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLES
NOR/C:\MyFiles\My Documents\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Repor1 Project PorflJrd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report\Oct2002 -3ru semi-arnual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table l
Groundwater Remediation Lelvels
FCX -Statesville OUl
Constituent Remediation Level
(ug/L)
I, 1-Dichloroethane 1
1, 1-Dichloroethcne 7
Bromodichloromethane 100
Chlorofonn 0.19
Chloromcthanc I
rretrachloroethene (PCE) 0.7
rrrichloroethene 2.8
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 6
Alpha-BHC 0.01
Alpha-chlordane 0.027
Beta-BHC 0.01
Dieldrin 0.1
Gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.027
Gamma-chlordane 0.027
Heptachlor Epoxide 0.038
Beryllium 4
Chromium 50
Manganese 50
Vanadium 98
Notes: -No discharge limit required by permit.
The remediation levels are defined in the Final ROD dated September
27, 1993; the discharge limits are set fonh in the City of Statesville
Discharge Permit No. T-43.
k:\20064\133\0ctober 2002 Reporl\Oct2002-tbls Table 1 -GW RGs I ofl
Discharge
Limit (µg/L)
700
7
10
0.19
I
0.7
2.8
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
..
--
..
CAS Number
75-34-3
75-35-4
75-27-4
67-66-3
74-87-3
127-18-4
79--01-6
117-81-7
319-84-6
5103-71-9
319-8S-7
60-57-1
58-89-9
12789-0)-6
1024-57-3
7440-41-7
7440-47-3
7439-96-5
7440-62-2
Note:
IIE -liiiil iiiiil -----Table 2
Summary of Monitoring Well Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville OUI
October 2002
Remedi•tion Station ID
Compound C.-d MW.J MW-t MW-5D MW-55 MW-6D MW-6S MW-7 M\V-8 (ug/L)
voes (ug.lL)
I, 1-Dichloroclhanc NA NA ~1~1 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U
I, 1-Dichloroethme NA NA ,.1 0.50 U ,., 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U
Bromodichloromethane 100 NA NA 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U o.so u 0.50 U 0.50 U
Chloroform 0.19 NA NA ~~ 4.5 -0,50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U
Chloromethanc I NA NA 0,50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U
Tetmchloroethene (PCE) 0.7 NA NA 0.25 J 0.13 J 0.12 J
T richloroethene ,, NA NA 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U
BNA1 (ug/L)
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 6 NA NA S9'i s.o UJ $20?15§ S.O U 5.0 UJ S.O U
Pesticides & PCBs (ua/L)
Alpha-BHC 0.01 0.010 UJ 066 I 3~7 C 0,02N'' 0.OJj 0.018 UR 0.010 UR
Alpha-chlordane 0.027 2.0 U 0.010 UJ 0.010 UR 2.0 U 0.010 U O.OJOU 0.010 UR 0.010 UR
Beta-BHC 0.01 . ..4.-3 0.010 UJ C)-20 ,a 0.010 U 003S,N, 0.010 UR 0.010 UR
Dieldrin 0.1 4.0 U 0.020 UI 4.0 U O.OSS J 0.0029 JN 0.020 UR 0.020 UR
Gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.027 IO 0.010 UJ ,.,,.s;1,c 0.025 1 ,.,. 0.030 O.OSO UR 0.010 UR
Gamma-chlordane 0.027 2.0 U 0.010 UJ 2.0 U 0.0085 JN 0.010 U 0.010 UR 0.010 UR
Heptaehlor Epoxide O.o38 2.0 U 0.010 UJ 0.010 UR 2.0 U 0.010 U 0.010 U 0.010 UR 0.010 UR
h1orauiai • Total (ug.lL)
Beryllium 4 NA NA 0.20 U 0.20 U 1.4 U 0.36 U
Chromium ,0 NA NA 1.2 R 0.80 UJ 49 J 2.4 R
Manganese ,0 NA NA 120 J 8.9 J ",\300•J ." 170iJ
Vanadium 98 NA NA 0.70 UJ 0.70 UJ 71 J 1.4 UJ
Shaded results exued remediation level.
Wells MW-I, MW-2, MW-9, MW-10, W-23, and W-24werenol sampled.
NA• Nol analyzed.
U .. Compound analyzed for but nol detected; value is the minimum quantilation limit
J .. Estimaied Value
N -Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
R"' QC indicates data is unusable. Compound may or may not br presenL R.esampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C = Confirmed by GCMS: I. When no value is reported, see chlordane constituents; 2. Constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
k~l133\0dooer2002R~002-1t>b T-2-~MWO.U. Page I of l
llill liiiil liiiil
MW-il(Dup) MW-II W-25 W-27S W-29 W-29(Dup)
0.50 U 312• ,. 0.50 U 0.50 U
0.50 U 1.7 0.50 U 0.10 J
0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U
0.50 U ~o;z1'1m mo:1sli 0.50 U
0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U 0.50 U
0.054 J ffii25~ 0,16 J ,.~ y'
0.50 U 1.7 0.50 U 0.50 U
S.0 U S.O UJ S.O U S.0 U S.0 UI 5.0 U1
0.010 UJ "· oo 4 0.010 UJ ~ 0.031
0.010 UJ 0.010 U o,010 UJ 0.010 U 0.010 U
0.010 UJ 0.0l2 • 0.010 UJ 0.010 U 0.010 U
0.020 UJ 0.020 U 0.020 U o.020 UJ 0.020 U 0.020 U
0.010 UJ 0.010 U 0.010 U 0.010 UJ 0:032 0.012
0.010 UJ 0.010 U 0.034 J o.ooa JN 0.019 U 0.018
0.010 UJ 0.010 U 0.032 J 0.010 UJ 0.010 U 0.010 U
0.20 U 0.20 U
0.80 UJ 0.80 UJ
17 J " J 0.70 UJ 0.70 UI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Casing Elevation Well (ft ms))
MW-I 949.5
MW-2 954.22
MW-3 954.51
MW-4 965.87
MW-5D 949.45
MW-SS 952.02
MW-6D 957.51
MW-6S 960.52
MW-7 950.69
MW-8 964.2
MW-9 959.42
MW-10 959.08
MW-JI 920.5
W-23 934.23
W-24 919.62
W-25 930.01
W-27 947.48
W-29 913.18
1 Measured on 23 April 2002
Table 3
Water Level Data
April 2002
FCX -Statesville OU I
Depth to water I Depth to Bottom
(ft) (ft BTOC)
39.24 47.25
44.57 51.00
39.16 50.80
44.25 53.70
35.75 123.90
37.77 43.30
44.IJ 123.IO
48.82 54.40
38.95 53.00
42.90 57.60
41.35 45.20
47.40 47.80
8.25 77.00
20.55 40.00
7.75 20.00
18.10 25.00
33.01 40.00
2.00 98.00
1 According to well construction logs and Table 3-1 in the Phase II RI
k:\20064\133\0ctober 2002 Aeporl\Oct2002-lbls Table 3 -Water Levels Page I of I
2 Water Table Elevation
(ft msl)
910.26
909.65
915.35
921.62
913.70
914.25
913.38
911.70
911.74
921.30
918.07
911.68
912.25
913.68
911.87
911.91
914.47
911.18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Parameter
Hydraulic
Conductivity
(K)
Top of Aquifer
Bottom of
Aquifer
Reference
Hydraulic
Head
Porosity
Well May
RW-1 1.959
RW-2 0.309
RW-3 0.398
Pumping Rates RW-4 0.435
(gallons per RW-5 0.805
minute) RW-6 0.737
RW-7 0.558
RW-8 2.608
RW-9 0.284
RW-10 0.449
Pumping Time 22 (days)
Hydraulic
Gradient
Storage
Note: UTC = Unable to calculate; data not available
k:\200641133\0ctober 2002 ReporN:lc:12002-tbls Table 4 -Modeling
Table 4
Modeling Data
May 2002 through October 2002
FCX -Statesville OUJ
Value
2.00 feet/day
923.0 feet msl
888.0 feet msl
911.91 feet (W-25)
0.2
June July August
2.808 2.374 3.479
0.655 0.430 0.607
0.505 0.418 0.554
0.546 0.462 0.610
1.118 0.906 1.276
1.509 4.565 2.733
0.993 0.872 1.210
0.960 3.445 UTC
0.363 0.304 0.388
0.539 0.457 0.598
29 31 31
0.0159 ft/ft
0.001 ft3/ft3
Page 1 of I
September October Average
3.212 2.296 2.794
0.615 4.078 1.132
0.514 0.380 0.483
0.579 0.414 0.530
1.128 0.868 1.059
2.672 4.883 2.889
1.070 0.793 0.946
0.695 1.772 1.722
0.374 0.279 0.346
0.632 0.455 0.545
24 37 174
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAS Number
630-2()..6
71-55-6
79-34-5
76-13-1
79-00-5
75--34-3
75-35-4
563--58-6
87-61-6
96-18-4
120-82-1
95-63-6
96-12-8
106-93-4
95-50.1
107-06-2
78-87-5
108-67-8
541-73-1
142-28-9
106-46•7
594-20-7
110-75-8
95-49-8
106-43-4
67-64-1
71-43-2
108-86-1
74.97.5
75-27-4
75-25-2
74-83-9
75-15-0
56-23-5
108-90.7
75-00.3
67-66--3
74-87-3
156-59-2
10061-01-5
110-82-7
124-46-1
74-95-3
75-71-8
100-41-4
87-68-3
109-59-1
98-82-8
79-20-9
591-78-6
Table 5
Influent and Effluent Results
FCX -Statesville OUI
October 2002
Station ID
Compound FCX-lnfluent FCX-Effiuent
voes (ug/l)
1,1.1,2-Tetrachloroethane -5.0 U
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane 0.50 U 5.0 U
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50 U 5.0 U
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 0.57 J -
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane 0.50 U 5.0 U
1, 1-Dichloroethane 2.2 5.0 U
1, 1-Dichloroethene 0.50 U 5.0 U
1, 1-Dichloropropene -5.0 U
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,2,3-Trichloropropane -5.0 U
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene -5.0 U
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.50 U 10 U
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.074 J 5.0 U
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene -5.0 U
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,3-Dichloropropane -5.0 U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
2,2-Dichloropropane -5.0 U
2-Chloroethytvinylether -10 U
2-Chlorotoluene -5.0 U
4-Chlorotoluene -5.0 U
Acetone 5.0 U 50 U
Benzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
Bromobenzene -5.0 U
Bromochloromethane 0.50 U 5.0 U
Bromodichloromethane 0.50 U 5.0 U
Bromoform 0.50 U 5.0 U
Bromomethane 0.50 U 10 U
Carbon Disulfide 0.50 U 50 U
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.094 J 5.0 U
Ch!orobenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
Chloroethane 0.50 U 10 U
Chloroform 2.2 5.0 U
Chloromethane 0.50 U 10 U
cis-1.2-Dlchloroethene 10 5.0 U
cis--1,3-0ichloropropene 0.50 U 5.0 U
Cyclohexane 0.50 U -
Dibromochloromethane 0.50 U 5.0 U
Oibromomethane -5.0 U
Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 10 U
Ethylbenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
Hexachlorobutadiene -5.0 U
IPE (lsopropyl Cellosolve) -5.0 U
lsopropylbenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
Methyl Acetate 0.50 UR -
Methvl Butyl Ketone 5.0 U 10 U
k:\20064\tJJ'Dd.ober 2002 Reporl\0Cl2002·1bls Table 5 • IN & EF D111 Page I of2
Discharge
Effluent
Limits (ug/L)
<DL
200
<DL
<DL
<DL
700
7
<DL
<DL
<DL
<DL
<DL
0.025
0.0004
620
0.38
0.56
<DL
620
<DL
75
<DL
<Dl
<DL
<DL
700
1
<DL
<DL
<DL
0.19
<DL
<DL
0.3
50
<DL
0.19
<DL
70
<DL
<DL
<DL
<DL
1400
29
<DL
<DL
<DL
<DL
<DL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
mber
76-93-3
108-10-1
1634-04-4
108-87-2
75-09--2
104-51-8
103-65-1
91-20-3
99-87-6
135-98-8
100-42-5
98-06-6
127-18-4
108-88-3
1330-20-7
156-60-5
10061-02-6
79-01-6
75-69-4
75-01-4
72-54-8
72-55-9
50-29-3
309-00-2
319-84-6
5103-71-9
319-85-7
57-74-9
319-86-8
60-57-1
959-98-8
33213-65-9
1031-07-8
72-20-8
7421-93-4
53494.70-.5
5S.89-9
12789-03-6
76-44-8
1024-57-3
72-43-5
8001-35-2
Table 5
Influent and Effluent Results
FCX -Statesville OUJ
October 2002
Station ID
Compound FCX-lnfluent FCX-Effluent
Methyl ethyl ketone {MEK) 5.0 U 10 U
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone 5.0 U 10 U
Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 0.50 U 5.0 U
Methylcyclohexane 0.50 U -
Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 5.0 U
n-Butylbenzene -5.0 U
n-Propylbenzene .. 5.0 U
Naphthalene -5.0 U
p-lsopropyltoluene -5,0 U
sec-butylbenzene -5.0 U
Styrene 0.50 U 5.0 U
tert-Buty!benzene -5.0 U
Tetrachloroethene 38 5.0 U
Toluene 0.50 U 5.0 U
Total Xylenes 0.50 U 5.0 U
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.38 J 5.0 U
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 U 5,0 U
Trichloroethene 2.2 5.0 U
Trichlorofluoromethane 0.50 U 10 U
Vinyl Chloride 0.50 U 10 U
Pesticides {ug/L)
4,4'-DDD {p,p'-DDD) 0.020 U 0,1 u
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE) 0.020 U 0.1 u
4.4'-DDT (p,p'-DDTI 0.020 U 0.1 U
Aldrin 0.010 U 0.05 U
Alpha-BHC 0.41 0.05 U
Alpha-chlordane 0.010 U -
Beta-BHC 0.50 0.05 U
Chlordane -0.05 U
Delta-BHC 0.010 U 0.05 U
Dieldrin 0.046 0.1 U
Endosulfan I (alpha) 0.010 U 0.05 U
Endosulfan II (beta) 0.020 U 0.1 u
Endosulfan Sulfate 0.020 U 0.1 U
Endrin 0.0060 JN 0.1 U
Endrin Aldehyde 0.020 U 0.1 U
Endrin Ketone 0.13 J -
Gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.079 0.05 U
Gamma.chlordane 0.010 U -
Heptachlor 0.010 U 0.05 U
Heptachlor Epoxide 0.010 U 0.05 U
Methoxychlor 0.10 U 0.1 U
Toxaphene 1.0 U 5.0 U
Discharge
Effluent
Limits (ug/L)
170
<DL
200
<DL
5
<DL
<DL
<DL
<DL
<DL
100
<DL
0.7
1000
530
70
<DL
2.8
2100
0.015
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Note: U = Compound analyzed for but not detected; value is the minimum quantitation limit.
J = Estimated Value
N "' Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
R = QC indicates data is unusable. Compound may or may not br present. Resampling and
reanalysis is necessary for verification.
<Dl = less than detection limit.
-= Results not provided.
k:\200641133\0ctobol, 2002 Report\Qd2002"tbls Table!,· IN & EF Dala Page 2 of2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
CITY DISCHARGE PERMIT .
NOR/C:\MyFiloslMy Doruments\F'rotocts\2006-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Pro;ect Per1\3rd Semi-Arrual Sampling Event Repof1\0d2002. 3rd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
JI. ®· i!lox 1111 • ~attsuillt. Nortlj Qlarolina 28687
August 8, 2000
OOCUMENT CON1R01. NUMi3£.I( !r.'-'t°vJZ:-3 o-4 er 6r K. -. _________ ..... -· . . . . ·.· .1 ,,.Z AW_
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, GA 30092-2550
Re: Modification to Permit No. T-43
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
-· ..
Dear Mr. Ferentz:
We have approved your request, stated in your letter of July 13, 2000, fur the modification in
language on your Effluent Limits page of Permit T-43. Enclosed is a revised copy of this page
fur your permit. This change is effective as of the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please call at [phone].
~~ ..
. Carol Rogers, ~lltul Coordinator
Water Resources Deprutneut
Enclosure
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DOGlJ}J''i:.:Y: C>J: ,\·~-· :_. y,";;,-;.,,_,, t!-_Pw ~f/1::. .3:~ AG6-K.
Permit No. T-43
EFFLUENT LIMITS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Parameter Permit Limit
Volatile *<MCL
hydrocarbons
Pesticides <1.0ug/1 Grab I/quarter
*MCL-North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards or the minimum Quantitation Limit
(QL) if the MCL is less than the QL, or if none exist, defuult to the QL.
**Frequency-Quarters will start in January, April, July and October
Collection of sample and analysis is the sole responmbility of the Permittee. Resuhs should be
submitted to the Director ofWater Resourres Department within 30 days of the sample event.
I
I •··\·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Qtity nf
~tat.en uill.e
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER . . ' .
. ..\'._ "\= L\)Otfl-3jj_;~
ii-@. i!!oJC llll • %tattsuillt. Nort~ QJ.irolina 28687
April 19, 2000
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, GA 30092-2550
Re: Revision to Pennit T-43
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
Dear Mr. Ferentz:
Enclosed is a revised limit page to your permit, No. T-43. These revisions include: the
addition of Pesticides monitoring; the phrase describing what limit applies if a parameter is not
included in the North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards; and, a clarification of who is
respoDSJ"ble for sampling. Please insert this page in your permit and remove the old page.
If you have any questions, please call me at (7o4) 878-3438.
Sincerely,
{! a;i)._ lo
Carol Rogers, ~neut Coordinator
Water Resources DepaI1rnent
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER .. 7.I
· iu=uot/7-~lv-. ~ r..y
Permit No. T-43
EFFLUENT LIMITS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Parameter Permit Limit **F
Volatile *<MCL I/quarter
· hydrocarbons
Pesticides <1.0ug/1 Grab I/quarter
*MCL -North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards or if none exist, default to Detection
Limit.
**Frequency-Quarters will start in January, April, July and October
Collection of sample and analysis is the sole responsibility of the Permittee. Results should be
submitted to the Director of Water Resources Department within 30 days of the sample event.
I ... . -DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMt:H:l1 · • · •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
<!titn of _
~tatesuille
lJI. ®· l/Jlol( 1111 • ~atrsuillr. Nort~ Qlarolina 28687
April 14, 2000
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, GA 30092-2550
Re: Transmittal ofPennit T-43
FCX-Statesville Superfimd Site
Dear Mr. Ferentz:
. v_ ~\00\1-o D--A'F~-¢
In accordance with your letter requesting the renewal of a discharge permit, we are forwarding
herewith the subject City Discharge Pennit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements
of the City of Statesville Sewer Use Code.
If any parts, measurements, frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you may request a modification by written request to the Director
identifying the specific issues to be contended. Unless such a request is made within 30 days·
following receipt of this permit, this permit shall be final and binding.
This permit does not effect or satisfy any requirements of the City of Statesville other than the
above rererenced.
Please sign and return a copy of the receipt page of this permit to our office. If you have any
questions, please contact Carol Rogers at [phone].
Sincerely,
~.-ty»> A L. F. "Joe" Hudson, Jr., Director
Water Resources Department
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBiJt
R1=~1Ji3co>t4f"'lt--:i.§;Jbii:,ili41;'1
CITY OF STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMIT NO. T-43
PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
SEWER USE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF STATESVILLE
Pmsuant to the City of Statesville Sewer Use Ordinance (here-after referred to as "The
Ordinance"), other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the City of
Statesville, as amended, and pursuant to the Pennit Application (here-after referred to as "The
Application'1 heretofore filed with the City of Statesville, FCX-Statesville Superfund Site,
(here-after referred to as "Permittee") is hereby authoriz.ed to discharge groundwater to
sanitary sewers of the City of Statesville (here-after referred to as "The City'1 in accordance
with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and special conditions contained herein
All such discharges shall be made at discharge locations approved in advance by the City.
This pennit shall become effective on April I 7, 2000.
This pennit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight April I 7, 2005.
SignedthistheKdayof /Jpr; /j :Jm:
Water Resources Department
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Permit No. T-43
SPECIAL CONDillONS
I. Permittee shall discharge at a rate not to exceed I 00 gallons per minute (GPM). Flow
must be monitored by a City approved meter, which is acces.5ible to the meter reader. A
billing account must be established with Collections at City Hall prior to discharge.
2. The Permittee shall operate and maintain an efficient p1et:Jeat1111:nt system
3. The discharge is subject to all requirements of the City ofStatesville's Sewer Use
Ordinance. Failure to meet these requirements and those listed in this permit will subject
the Permittee to fines and possible termination of the permit.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· Description ofDischarges
rm,
01
Permit No. T-43
Description
Treated growtdwater
The sampling point for Pipe 01 is the sampling port off p1e1Ieatment system.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
oOOUMENT CONTROL NUMBER g i: . t.p,ob41 3 • · ~
Permit No. T-43
EFFLUENT LIMITS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Parameter Permit Limit
Volatile *<MCL
hydrocarbons
*MCL -North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards
**Frequency-Quarters will start in January, April, July and October
I/quarter
Results should be submitted to the Director of Water Resources Department within 30 days of the sample event. ·
1-· ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~fiOUMENT CONTROL NUMUEi, _
i1-.H-Jotfi-sb , ii fx.
Receipt of the foregoing Permit is acknowledged. This the It · day of A-?/2. \ L
2000.
Name of Permittee Byn::~~
Ad ~5 /v1Zf(llc. ~ , SrE loO
~wss · tA: ~-i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Royf. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550 ~ 770-263-S400 • Fax [phone]
www.rf...veston.com
Mr. L. F. Hudson, Director
Water Resources Department
City of Statesville
P.O.Boxllll
Statesville, North Carolina 28687
RE: Notice to Discontinue Discharge
Discharge Permit T-43
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
Statesville, North Carolina
Document Control No.: RFW048-JD-AIFX
Dear Mr. Hudson:
May2,200I
Work Order No.: 20064.047.100.90l4
The pwpose of this letter is to inform you that WESTON shut down the groundwater treatment system at the FCX-Statesville Superfund site on April JO, 200 L There will be no discharge to the City of Statesville sewer system until further notice from WESTON. WESTON requests that the discharge permit remain in place since the shut down will be tempoT31)'.
WESTON fully expects to resume treatment within one month. An effiuent sample will be collected upon start up of the system The analytical results will be forwarded to you within JO days after sample collection. This should fulfill WESTON's monitoring requirement to sample at the beginning of the quarter.
If you have any questions, please call RalphMcKeen or me at [phone].
cc: Ken Mallary, U.S. EPA Region 4
File
Sincerely,
C'M,l>nc:r ... 11YW'4?..;..s,wCr.O!b,r~tl ·« • ::I T-Ci&.clD~4'x
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
"' 770-263-5400 • Fax [phone]
Betty Wagner
Collections Manager
City of Statesville
301 S_ Center Street
Statesville, North Carolina 28687
Re: Change ofBilling Address
FCX Superfund Site
1620-1 West Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Wagner:
www.rfweston.com
Via Facsimile
13 April 2000
Roy F. Weston (WESTON®) respectfully requests a change of address for the account at the
above-mentioned address.
WESTON operates and maintains a groundwater pump and treat system at the FCX site under
_ contract to the U.S. EPA. Although EPA submitted the required deposit, WESTON will be
responsible for payment of the monthly invoice.
Please submit all invoices to: Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place,
Norcross, Georgia 30092
Attn: Joseph Ferentz
JMF/jmf
cc: Ken Mallary, U.S. EPA Region 4
File
Sincerely, _
ROY F. WESTON, INC.
-hF-tz ~
Project Scientist
NORIC:\MY DOCUMENTS\MYWORK\PRQ.ECTS\F C X\OTHER CORRESPONDENCE\CHANGE OF BILLING ADDRESS.DOC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
"' 770-263-5400 • Fax [phone]
www.rfweston.com
12 April 2000
Ms. Carol Rogers
Pretreabnent Coordinator
City of Statesville .
P.O. Box Bil
. ~fu}Ot\1-30-AGDM
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMB~R.. • ·'
Statesville, North Carolina 28687
RE: Renewal of Wastewater Discharge Permit T-43
FCX Superfund Site .
Statesville, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Rogers:
Roy F. Weston, Inc. (WESTON.,) respectfully requests renewal of Permit T-43. The permit to discharge
wastewater under the sewer ordinance of the City of Statesville was granted to WESTON on 1 April 1996.
The permit expired on 1 April 2000. WESTON requests that the permit be renewed for a period of five (5)
years to accept treated effluent from the groundwater remediation system.
WESTON does not require any modifications to the permit conditions.
If you have any questions, please call Ralph McKeen or me at [phone].
cc: Ken Mallary, U.S. EPA Region 4
File
Sincerely,
ROYF. WEST()~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXB
SYSTEM CHECK FORMS
NOR/C:\M'yFileslMy Documenls\Projocts\20064133 F C X\Option Yea, 1\0930 Repat Project Perl\Jrd Serni-Anrull Sampling Event Report\0d2002. 3rd semi--anJal rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DOCUMENT CONTROLHUMaEa Rt:v.l .,\3 3:-::sA---.· .. -'Ii(
,b..1.-C--t,I\
CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL
FCX -STATESVILLE
AES PROJECT NO. 153-92001-02
SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT NO. 0012435
Date: 5n102
To: Joe Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
From: Brad Burdick
Staff Scientist
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Comments/Recommended Actions:
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
The following describes out-of-scope work activities performed at the FCX site in Statesville, NC. All of the
following work is related to the replacement of regulators and the removal of recovery pumps for servicing by
Clean Environment Equipment. The following details the labor hours and expenses incurred for the servicing of
recovery pumps RW-1, RW-2, RW-3 and RW-6.
Project Management ( equipment and supplies tracking
and ordering, coordination with pump mfr.)
Administrative Expenses
Equipment and Materials
Regulators and Pressure Gauges (2)
Pump service for pumps: RW-1, RW-3
andRW-6.
Shipping
February 14, 2002
Replaced regulator on RW-2 and
removed pump for RW-3 and replaced with
loaner pump
March 12, 2002
Replaced regulator for R W-1 and removed
pump for RW-1 for servicing
3.0 hours@ 65/hr
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
2.00 hours @ 65/bour
2.00 hours @65/bour
$195.00
$101.70
$130.90
$826.60
$59.44
$130.00
$130.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
October 2, 200 I
Page2
April 15, 2002
Removed pump from RW-6 for servicing
and put in loaner pump
Proposal Accepted:
Sincerely,
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
Roy. F. Weston,
1.0 hours @ 65/hour $65.00
Total: $1,638.64
~p-3/oz--
oate
Ii -----,--T~l:U 1:NVIKUNMl:NTAL :,ysTEMS PAOB NO: 1 II DBA, ♦ CLEAN ENVIRONMENT E UIPMENT INVOICK NO, 099087
REMIT TO _. Clean En.-ironmenl Equipment
Dept. LA2 I 483
Pasadena, CA 91185-1483
INVOICB DATB: I
I ( ...... _____ I_N_v_o_I_C_E ____ __,)
CUSTOMER NO: 2AE701
I CUSTOMER PH:
BILL TO:
I
I
I
TERMS:
AES INC
ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
434 COPPERFIELD BLVD NE-STE B
CONCORD NC 28025
CASH #1 DISC:
C.!\.SH u~ ·,1-DI3C-~
NET DUE DATE: 053002
YOUR ORDER NO: 1531200102
OUR ORDER NO: RC0204027-0000
SHIP TO:
AES INC
434 COPPERFIELD BLVD. N.E.
SUITE B
CONCORD NC 28025
SHIPPED: 04/30/2002
SHIPPED VIA. ~PS BLlJE
F.O.B.: SHIPPING POINT
SHIPMENT NO: 069684 EF:
04/30/2002
YOUR CUSTOMER REP ·rs: DAV PRO NO:
'-=================================================-
1\
QTY
ORDERED
<l
I \
;'I°
l'.r
I'.
· S E \' E I< i',
T !IE 1' T
;',J I\\ ! C I S
QTY
SHIPPED
QTY ITEM
B.0. NUMBER
TQED. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS.
-♦ CLEAN ENVIRONMENT EQUIPMENT .. I
I
Phone: S10-891-0880 Fax:S10-444-6789
UNIT PRICE
SALES TAX:
. FREIGHT:
LESS:
OTHER CHARGES,
INVOICE TOTAL:
EXTD PRIC
o.po
Jii. 05
o.oo
o.oo
143.75
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ Clean Environment
_ Equipment
• ·~s;:
(510) Ml1-oB80-FAX (510) ~ -.....,.cee.com
BIii To: Ship To:
AES. Inc AE.S. Inc
Invoice 40726
Invoice Date 03/07/02
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E 434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E
Suite B Sulle 8
Concotd. NC 28025 Concord, NC 28025
The lo,going equipment is ~,eel sut,jec;t to lhe temlS and condi1ionS printed on !he reverse side of thia Invoice.
1 1 MISC-PT
0 BOTTOM SPRING FOR 3-6075$
1 1 MISC-PT
0 PIVOTPIN
1 1 MISC-PT
,.· 0 BL INLET SEAT UHMW
1 1 MISC-PT
0 EXHAUST POPPET ANO SEAT
1 1 MISC-PT
0 AIR INTAKE POPPET AND SEAT
1.00 1.00 LABOR-S
0.00 LABOR· SERVICE
1 1 SHIP-5
0 SHIPPING CHARGES· SERVICE
MRI\NTY: 90 DAY PARTS & IA80R UNLESS OTHERWISE SPEC1FIEO
P.O. 1531200102
REPAIR OF (1) /IP-4 SKT BL SIN ~5S
PVRCHASeR: BRAD 8UROICl<JSTEVe 1,U,1HGER
EA
EA
EA
EA
HR
EA
Nontaxeblo $ubl0181
Taxable Sublotal
Tax
Total Invoice
lO~FPC'Jlt'YOuA~~CIIU.! ........
13.50
N
2.50
N
76.2S
N
42.50
N
79.20
N
55.00
N
36.55
N ' •
13.50
2.50
76.ZS
42.50
79.20
55.00
38.55
305.50
0.00
0.00
I
TQEO ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
DBk ~ CLEAN ENVIRONMENT E Ull'MENl
_. Clean Environment Equipment
Dept. LA2 I 483
Pa.sadena, CA 9 II 85-1483
\.
PAGE NO: 1
INVOICE NO: 098670
INVO,CB DATB: 04/15/2002
( I N V O I C E )
IJSTOMER
iSTOMER
.LL TO:
I
I
PERMS:
NO: 2AE701
PH:
AES INC
434 COPPERFIELD BLVD.
SUITE B
CONCORD NC 28025
CASH ff1 DISC:
CASH #2 DISC;
I
NET DUE DATE: 051502
I
I
OUR CUSTOMER
QTY
ORDERED
REP IS:
QTY
SHIPPED
DAV
N.E.
QTY
8.0.
ITEM
NUMBER
YOUR ORDER NO: 1531200102
OUR ORDER NO: RC0204008-0000
SHIP TO:
AES INC
434 COPPERFIELD BLVD. N.E.
SUITE B
CONCORD NC 28025
SHIPPED: 04/12/2002
SHIPPED VIA: urs RED
F.O.B.: SHIPPING POINT
SHIPMENT NO: 069201 EF:
PRO NO:
UNIT PRICE EXTD PRICE
I
TQED ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
o""' ♦ CLEAN ENYIRONMENTE UIPMENl
REMIT TO_. Clean Environment Equipment
DepL LA2148J
PAGE NO: 2
INVOICE NO: 098670
INVOICE DATE: 04/15/2002
l'-------P_a_~_ad_e_n_a~, C::=A=9=1=1=8=S-=1=48=3====::'.:_ ______ ::::=======:-------------'
( INVOICE )
tsTOMER NO:
USTOMER PH:
2AE~Ol
II.LL TO:
AES INC
I
I
434 COPPERFIELD BLVD.
SUITE B
CONCORD NC 28025
ERMS: CASH #1
C}\SH #2
NET DUE DATE:
OUR CUSTOMER
QTY
ORDERED
SEVERN
DISC:
DI!Jt.::
051502
REP IS:
QTY
SHIPPED
DAV
N.E.
QTY
B.O.
ITEM
NUMBER
I T II EN I' ·TQED ENVIRONMEN"fALSYSTEMS
...., ♦ CLEAN ENVIRONMENl EQUIPMENT
l'hone:510-891-0880 Fax: [phone]
YOUR ORDER NO: 1531200102
OUR ORDER NO: RC0204008-0000
SHIP TO:
AES INC
434 COPPERFIELD BLVD.
SUITE B
CONCORD NC 28025
N.E.
SHIPPED: 04/12/2002
~!-!IP?ED VIA: UPS RED
F.O.B.: SHIPPING POINT
SHIPMENT NO: 069201 EF:
PRO NO:
UNIT PRICE
SALES TOTAL:
SALES .TAX:
FREIGHT:
LESS:
OTHER CHARGES:
INVOICE TOTAL:
EXTD PRICE
309'. 70
0.00
67.65
0.00
0.00
377 .35
--lillil iilil liilll iliil
SOU>TOACCOUNT 0845646546 APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES 814 DAVIDSON DR
iilil
CONCORD NC 28025-432
CAWR
Upon thti ,.cum for cndlt MCl.lof -.pt 11e.11 of the aiboY• liata:I 0,-., Pftlduct(a)~·custoftW W#flllta and ,....ma
that no prop91ty derNQII ot.PlflOMI lnj.-y NS resuttad from
UM of~ ptOducl(al end cuatomll' futttW agrNI thll It 'MIi not ....i env dlim ....... W.W. Gralnget, Inc., Its ~enddlvlllonl-orlta..-..1n-,1Utt lnYotmg the above ... product(&).
GRAlNGE&
· DIV of W.W.GRAINGER, INC.
SAP DELIVERY 6069619687
----PACKING LIST
EMPLOYEE PAGE NO
16:48 2MKH 1 ofl
ST 28203-4135
CHECK AMOUNT CASH REC'O/PAIO ;'.JflANS.:T.Y'P.E'" )'CO):',''
INVOICE WIU. FOUOW
SAlES TERMS AND CONOITIONS ON REVERSE 6'0£
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER
I c.rtlty that 11 I •m purchulna the materl•U•I aa •matetiall of trede• .. d1fln.d In the Huerdou.
Mattrlala Regulations In Title 49 of the Code of Ftderal Rtgulatlont. I Intend to UH the materlal(a) In direct auppott of my l)(lncipal tK.lalnaa (which 11
not tranaportatlon), and I do not lntand to reHU the matlritl, Ot tranapon them In I vahlcla other than my own.
TAX TOTAL
DATE SHIPPEO/PICKEO UP
T TA
113.00 ,t,N'9J,3'2/ •
8.58 130.90
111101 Elli 111111111111111 111111111111111 IIIII IIIII IIII 1111 Vltit our web 1ite@ www.gralnger'.com
GRAr;Nr.:.f;& , DIV of W.W,GRAINGER, INC. OEUVlAY, .1401 SOUTH MINT STREET
ATTENTION
02,/12/2002 6069619687
PROJl!CT/J08 I
DEPARTMENT I
PO REL.IASI I CALLERBRAO BURDICK
ATTENTION
PROJECT/JOB I
D!PAATMENT I
PO REL!ASE I
02,/12/2002
6069619687
CALLER BRAD BURDICK
-
FedEx I Ship Manager I Shipping History
• ~P Inside U .s.
•~Outside US.
• Sb.Ip rnstde u s -Frelatit
• Trock ShiQment
• Cancel Shlo~
► Schedule Courier
• Address Book • ~i• Profiles
• :itJ.fpl11D9.l:llmY.
• 1.Jodote ShlooJng.frQllle
·~~ • Tutorlot
• Contact lnformetton
'MY~
► Go to fedex,com
• 22..12..MY~
• Go to Ship M•n•g~
bQQ!n
• order su,ml!~
Sn
Your Shipment Details
Tracking Number:790386705366 Date: Apr 17 2002
From:
THOMASW
VVITNER
APPLIED EARTH
SCIENCES
434 COPPERFIELD
BLVD NE
SUITE B
CONCORD NC
28025 us
7047957075
To:
Mario
Clean Environment
Equipment
1133 Seventh
Street
Oakland CA
94607 us
800-537-1767
Service: FedEx Express Saver
Packaging: Your Packaging
Handllng: Drop Off
Weight: 15LBS
Shipper Account Number:
167737358
BIii Shipment To: 167737358
BIii DutyfTax/Fees:
Expresa Reference:
Declared Value: USD0
Status: NIA
Shipment Type: Express
Ground P.O. Number:
Ground Invoice Number:
Ground Reference:
Commerclal/Resldentlal
Status: NIA
Non-Standard
Packaging: NIA
Home Delivery
Signature: NIA
Home Delivery Option: NIA
Home Delivery Date: NIA
AOD Status: NIA
Auto POD Status: NIA
Ground ShlpAlert: NIA
~y Rate Quote•:
~mount: NIA
•The courtesy rate shown here may be different than the actual charges for your
shipment. Differences may occur based on actual weight, dimensions. and other
-------111!!!!1 -
Page 1 of2
.. ..
FedEx I Ship Manager I Shipping History
• fillip lnsJde U.S.
' fillip outside U.S.
• SIJ!P 1ns1cte u s -FrelalJ1
► Track Shi™lJ!.
• Concel Shlom~
• Schedule Courier
• Address Book
• fJm.Shic Profiles
• SIJ!~rut!Q~Y.
• Uodste Shioll!nll.El:2!1m.
·~~ • M!!d!!l
• Contect lnjormotlon
•MY~
► Go to fedex com
' Qo.12.My~
• Go to Shi~ Monoger
LQg!n
• Order SU!lil!!M
Your Shipment Details
Tracking Number:790340404602 Date: Mar 12 2002
From:
THOMASW
WITNER
APPLIED EARTH
SCIENCES
434 COPPERFIELD
BLVD NE
SUITE B
CONCORD NC
28025 us
7047957075
To:
Mario
Clean Environment
Equipment
1133 Seventh
Street
Oakland CA
94607 us
800-537-1767
Service: Standard Overnight
Packaging: Your Packaging
Handling: Drop Off
Weight: 15LBS
Shipper Account Number:
167737358
Bill Shipment To: 167737358
Bill DutyfTax/Fees:
Express Reference:
Declared Value: USD0
Status: NIA
Shipment Type: Express
Ground P.O. Number:
Ground Invoice Number:
Ground Reference:
CommerclallResldentlal
Status: NIA
Non-Standard
Pac,kaglng: NIA
Home Delivery
Signature: NIA
Home Delivery Option: NIA
Home Delivery Date: NIA
AOD Status: NIA
Auto POD Status: NIA
Ground ShlpAlert: NIA
~Y Rate Quote•:
~ount: NIA
*The courtesy rate shown here may be different than the actual charges for your
shipment. Differences may occur based on actual weight. dimensions. and other
factors. Consult the applicable FedEx Service Gulde or the FedEx Rate Sheets for
----.. -..
!:'age l or L.
111111 -11!!!!1 .. Pl!!!!!!I
1-
1~
'' -i " ---::._J_---..;-.J.;..j.Y\~J..
.
'
e
l
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
!
-
-
-
c
'
~
i

_;__...L_j___ ,,Jf 12-,s;
' n ,v -L _,;...<--""'1-1:::
,J c.<-J~ ~✓~a~!'~f __ _ _ _:k::,,_.C.~' ~ -::. ± __ ( s. s i f.4-;".J-I" Ii, --_t~. . ' ,: '
___ 1.tl!_-l
_\'-1)-~
-·---·-···--·---··-----·-·--
·
-
-
-
·
.
.
.
;

'
' .,
-5,''J-1 ---\ V. .) ,IV~ ...J Ol' I)) ?f"ll
---li'"n , ;,~---GvTv'lJ"ij-1 ov s-1
· Jv-,~-----<>'l::i-=,y)v~5--, .J 2--,, j o
7~?J? _____ )T1>~v~_: : v· -<'~-~JMP
..,_., P" l /--Z
• ·-'-•·., ',> • . ' : ., .... ···,'-'.·
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
liiiil liiil liiilll liiiil -

-
---... ________ ., __ _
I
i I
:f .l I
.. t~·-•i''.
, -~;.: :
··-•· ---·-'--+---+--+--+--t-
. 1w·-'
~~ri-c,.,.+.-,-o'L-+--~;.,,t"kl ... Jt::. _.£4~~4=1-~c4-+,---+-:.-::l--=:-l,,+i; crvfO{l
. ~·-<
-:.;:,?:'.,-l!~~~\~£~,7\~";"t-.<~~:trl~~~-~ "-··
.... . ·-: .
· .. · __ ,_.:_:';/.,
.... ~--~;·/ ..
. . . ~-_.,~~
~/".':i/-< \.·>. / _;;,:_,t:,;:-;;-:;c·;,-;:,,/.-_.: .... :'···' _·.·. '. . .
I
I
I
I
I
' . _.; .. · ... · .• .. ,•.•: I .. ,Ui:., ... ,,, .. /:._ . .:c:.': .. .::,\,".'-:'.· .,, .. ; .·, ... ··· .. :. . . . ·. ... . •· .. ·.:.;'.· .. ,/.:.,·, ......... , .. ,_. __ .;-_ _.: .. ·. _: ... , ... ,··
I
I '.,
~~ t I ....
I
I --~
:,,
I I
' 1:
I!
/,JrtJt2.;.f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
D
ORIGINAL
CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL
FCX -STATESVILLE
AES PROJECT NO. 153-92001-02
SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT NO. 0012435
Date: 6/05/02
To: Joe Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
From: Brad Burdick
Starr Scientist
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Comments/Recommended Actions:
Dear Mr. Ferentz:
. Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
The following proposal describes the cost estimations for the work requested by you at the FCX-Statesville Site. A
portion of the following costs are priced on a per foot basis.
It is the understanding of AES that the EPA will be responsible for the drilling:and installation of three new
recovery wells and their associated vaults. AES will complete the plumbing and trenching from the wells to the
treatment system and install three new pneumatic pumps in each well. The trenching and pump installation will be
performed in accordance with existing project specifications. It is the assumption of AES that the wells will also be
drilled in accordance with these project specifications.
This proposal assumes that trenching and piping will not be required to cross public roadways. If it is required to
cross roadways with system piping, we can develop a strategy and cost for doing so, taking into consideration
options and permitting requirements. Generally, under road crossings using horizontal drilling techniques or jack-
and-bore techniques, the cost is approximately $55.00 per fool
· Equipment Rental
Backhoe Rental for Trenching
Jack Hammer Rental (if necessary)
Recovery Well Pumps and Accessories Needed
AP-4Pumps
MOD AP4B to UHMW Seat
I" OD Black Nylon Tubing
5/8" OD Black Nyfon Tubing
½" OD Black Nylon Tubing
I" OD Tube Barb x I" MPT Brass
¼" Filter Regulator
· Pressure Gauge
Administrative Expenses
One week
One week
3@ 1,900.00
3@ l0.00
180 ft. @ 2.65/ft.
180 ft. @ 1.121ft.
180 ft. @ 0.90/ft.
3@8.10
3@56.50
3@9.32
Lump Sum
$550.00
. $175.00
$5,700.00
$30.00
$477.00
·$201.00
$162.00
$24.00
$169.00
$28.00
$751.00
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite 8 • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: (704) 79S-7075 • fox: [phone]
I.-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
June 5, 2002
Page2
Plumbing and Misc. Trenching Materials
Plumbing Materials (PVC piping and misc.
fittings, air line assemblies, etc.)
Trenching/Backfilling (50 It minimum)
Concrete Asphalt Patching (50 It minimum)
Labor
Project Management (project coordination, parts
ordering, etc,)
Mobilization
Project Geologist
Field Geologist
Senior Engineer
Proposal Accepted:
Roy. F. Weston, Inc.
Sincerely,
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
200 ft, @ 6.00/ft.
200 It @ 25/ft.
I 00 It @ 20/ft,
4 hours @ 65/hour
I
8 hours @ 70/hour
60 hours @ 55/hour
2 hours @ $ I 00/hour
Total:
$1,200.00
$5,000,00
$2,000.00
$260.00
$350.00
$560.00
$3,300.00
$200.00
$21,137.00
Date
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
May 8, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
DOCUMENT CONTROLN~MIM:'4 RPw t "3 3 -j: 1\--A;_:zo
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-Statesville Site. These
forms cover the dates; April 23rd, May I st and May 71\ 2002 Any work performed during
the weekly visit is explained in detail on the system check form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
~~
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 2802S • Tel: [phone] • Fox: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
0
Date: 4/23/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 522,247.40 cit
RW-1 442,036.27 cit
RW-2 142,825.75 cit
RW-3 77,962.77 cit
RW-4 158,958.15 cit
RW-5 216,906.60 cit
RW-6 197,568.87 cit
RW-7 259,571.56 cit
RW-8 493,760.27 cit
RW-9 86,783.02 cit
RW-10 138,637.02 cit
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
-
37.33 Point
36.99 SF-1
39.50 SF-1
36.65 SF-2
40.35 SF-2
42.10
41.18
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent -
Effluent -
Influent -
Effluent -
40.87 (46.67-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
46.53
.44.57 Any leaks observed: No
Describe repairs conducted· . .
Upon arrival for the semi-annual sampling event the compressor was not running. The breaker had been
tripped. The breaker was reset and the system was re-started. The compressor ran for about 5 minutes
before the breaker tripped again. Ingersoll Rand was called to come out and troubleshoot the compressor.
The Ingersoll Rand technician determined that the compressormotor had gone bad. The motor had
also ground fai.!lted which created a failure of the compressor contactor in the control panel.
The faulty motor was an explosion proof type which would have to be special ordered. Also, an electrician
would have to be called to replace the contact and diagnose the control panel tci make sure there were no
other problems.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 5/1/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent NM cit -
RW-1 NM cit NM
RW-2 NM cit NM
RW-3 NM cit NM
RW-4 NM cit NM
RW-5 NM cit NM
RW-6 NM cit NM
RW-7 NM cit NM
RW-8 NM cit NM
RW-9 NM cit NM
RW-10 NM cit NM
Describe repairs conducted:
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
No
Point
SF-1
SF-1
SF-2
SF-2
Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
4.0
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent NM
Effluent NM
Influent NM
Effluent NM
No
Arrived on site to prepare the building for the motor replacement. After reviewing the building construction it
was determined that the roof could not be taken apart very easily. It was determined that a side panel
could be removed to allow access to the motor. Much of the side panel was disassembled to prepare for
the installation of the new motor next week.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 5ll/02
I
I Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon anival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 522,496.00 cit
RW-1 442,099.83 cit
RW-2 142,853.82 cit
RW-3 77,966.25 cit
RW-4 158,993.90 cit
RW-5 216,951.60 cit
RW-6 197,605.93 cit
RW-7 259,587.53 cit
RW-8 493,817.17 cit
RW-9 86,810.72 cit
RW-10 138,674.38 cit
Pescnbe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
. Routine Hours
.
No
-
42.40 Point
57.16 SF-1
59.43 SF-1
50.27 SF-2
56.50 SF-2
55.19
39.10
Nonroutine Hours
10.5
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 19
Effluent 19
Influent 19
Effluent 18
49.20 (55.00-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
59.55
62.08 Any leaks observed: No
Met with the Ingersoll Rand technician at 8:00. He began disconnection of the old motor while I began to
disassemble the side panel of the building. A Lull was dropped off around 10:30 to use for removing the old
motor and installing the new motor. After the new motor was placed inside the building, the technician
began wiring the new motor. The electricians from SEH Electrical arrived on site around 11 :00 to replace
the contacts and to troubleshoot the ~ystem. The system was restarted around 2:00. The compressor was
up an running. The Ingersoll Rand technician then performed some minor adjustments on the compressor
so it would run at its optimum performance level. The compressor was adjusted so that when it was not
producing air it would be running at an idle speed. This would keep the motor from shutting on and off
and would take some strain off the motor caused by its continous starting and stopping. It would also allow
the fans to continue running which will help cool the motor during its down time. The electrician was
troubleshooting the modem to determine why the alarm light was still on. It was determined that it was most
likely due to the battery backup of the modem. The modem's backup batteries are a rechargeable nickel
.cadmium battery which are constantly charged when the system is running. However, as a result of the
system being down for almost 2 weeks the batteries had lost their charge. As a result if the modem was
connected to the phone line it would send an alarm message every 10 minutes. The electrician suggested
to disconnect the phone line and allow the batteries time to recharge. If during the next site visit, the
batteries were still low it was suggested to replace the batteries with new ones. During the next week
visit the modem will be re-connected either with the exisitng batteries or with new ones.
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
May 28, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
ORIGINAL
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBE_R RfY \'3s -
. . "3k-Ac\-~(l
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-Statesville Site. These
forms cover the dates from May IO through May 24, 2002. Any work performed during
the weekly visit is explained in detail on the system check form. I have also enclosed the
invoice for the motor replacement work performed at the site.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc..
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fox: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 5/10/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent -ell -
RW-1 -ell -
RW-2 -ell -
RW-3 -ell -
RW-4 -ell -
RW-5 -ell -
RW-6 -ell -
RW-7 -ell -
RW-8 -ell -
RW-9 -ell -
RW-10 -ell -
Descrjbe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
Yes
Point
SF-1
SF-1
SF-2
SF-2
Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
4.0
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent -
Effluent -
Influent -
Effluent -
No
Traveled to site to drain carbon tanks to prepare for carbon change out the following week.
System was shut off at approximately 17:00 and the carbon tanks were drained of all the water.
The additional time was spent attempting to remove the bolts from the top of each carbon tank. The bolts
were extremely rusted and some were difficult to remove. The bolts that could not be removed were
sprayed with a rust remover and were going to be removed the following week
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 5113102
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent -cf! -
RW-1 -cf! -
RW-2 -cf! -
RW-3 -cf! -
RW-4 -cf! -
RW-5 -cf! -
RW-6 -cf! -
RW-7 -cf! -
RW-8 -cf! -
RW-9 -cf! -
RW-10 -cf! -
Pescnbe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
No
Point
SF-1
SF-1
SF-2
SF-2
Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
4.0
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent -
Effluent -
Influent -
Effluent -
No
Traveled to hardware store to get replacement bolts for carbon tanks. The remainder of the bolts were
removed from the carbon tanks.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 5/14/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 530,755.80 cit
RW-1 444,629.22 cit
RW-2 143,321.82 cit
RW-3 78,566.60 cit
RW-4 159,635.82 cit
RW-5 218,034.25 cit
RW-6 198,554.15 cit
RW-7 259,684.10 cit
RW-8 496,228.82 cit
RW-9 87,228.25 cit
RW-10 139,338.02 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
-
42.26 Point
57.40 SF-1
59.32 SF-1
47.56 SF-2
57.00 SF-2
43.26
54.93
Nonroutine Hours
8.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 16
Effluent 16
Influent 16
Effluent 15
48.55 (54.35-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
59.50
61.95 Any leaks observed: No
Met with Envirotrol on stte for carbon change out Spent most of the time vacuuming out the old carbon and
replacing it with the newly activated carbon. After the carbon was replaced, the system was re-started.
The system was monitored for approximately one hour to ensure it was running properly.
After the system was determined to be running as designed the weekly groundwater measurements were collected.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 5/24/02
Amy Icenhour
Was the system. running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 556,235.14 cit
RW-1 451,940.00 cit
RW-2 144,363.51 cit
RW-3 79,977.48 cit
RW-4 161,164.38 cit
RW-5 220,967.94 cit
RW-6 201,486.71 cit
RW-7 262,332.08 cit
RW-8 -cit
RW-9 88,216.38 cit
RW-10 140,914.07 . cit
Qescdbe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
55.75 Point
54.75 SF-1
49.25 SF-1
50.05 SF-2
56.60 SF-2
55.70
56.70
-
59.42
57.25 Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 18
Influent 19
Effluent 18
No
Newly charged batteries were installed into the modem. However, the modem was still showing an alarm
even though the system was running as designed. During the next site visit AES will troubleshoot the
modem to determine the reason for the alarm. Therefore, the modem is still not connected to the
system at this time.
I ' -,----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
June 21, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
DOCUMENT COfffRCL NUf8I 02'v/ ~·;?-:re
Af.1'10
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-Statesville Site. These
forms cover the dates; May 2911\ June 41\ June 111\ June 121h and June 171h, 2002 Any
work performed during the weekly visit is explained in detail on the system check form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 5/29/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 563,177.10 cft
RW-1 453,967.50 cft
RW-2 144,674.72 cft
RW-3 80,372.45 cft
RW-4 161,588.52 cft
RW-5 221,789.82 cit
RW-6 202,150.63 cft
RW-7 263,072.98 cft
RW-8 504,499.00 cft
RW-9 88,492.82 cft
RW-10 141,347.92 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
-
45.60 Point
57.43 SF-1
58.65 SF-1
44.64 SF-2
56.04 SF-2
56.18
58.45
Nonroutine Hours
3.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 21
Effluent 21
Influent 20
Effluent 20
51.75 (57.55-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
59.72
62.36 Any leaks observed: No
Upon arrival air compressor line coming from building was broken. Traveled to store to pick up new threaded
fitting for replacement. Replaced PVC and restarted system. Began troubleshooting modem to detennine
what the problem was. Modem was still flashing that there was an alann even though the system was
running with no alanns. Traced all wires from modem to make sure everything was connected properly.
There appeared to be no problem with any of the electrical connections. · Batteries in modem were fully
charged and the electrical outlet for the modem was functioning properly, so that was not the problem.
Next, switched off the main power and reset all the breakers in the box and also hit the resets for the
pumps and the air compressor. Turned the system back on and the alann light on the modem was no
longer flashing. Everything was functioning properly now. The computer in the system must have been
stuck in some sort of loop which never allowed the modem's alann to reset itself. System was running as
designed now.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 6/4/02
Amy Icenhour
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
· Effluent 578,115.40 ell
RW-1 458,495.32 ell
RW-2 146,049.05 ell
RW-3 81,169.90 cit
RW-4 162,422.58 ell
RW-5 223,523.58 cit
RW-6 203,438.75 ell
RW-7 264,602.87 ell
RW-8 -cit
RW-9 89,072.08 cit
RW-10 142,225.15 ell
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
53.71 Point
60.00 SF-1
57.05 SF-1
44.61 SF-2
56.35 SF-2
47.70
58.45
-
59.60
62.23 Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
1.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent
Effluent
Influent
Effluent
No
Removed loaner pump from RW-6 and replaced with the newly serviced pump from Clean Environment
Equipment
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 6/11/02
I
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours Nonroutine Hours IBrad Burdick 2.5
Was the system ronning upon arrival: No upon leaving: No
Flow Meter Readings: Sand Filter Readings Effluent -cft -While TP #2 is running. RW-1 -cit -Point Pressure (PSI) RW-2 -cft -SF-1 Influent -RW-3 -cit -SF-1 Effluent -RW-4 -cit -SF-2 Influent -RW-5 -cft -SF-2 Effluent -RW-6 -cft -
RW-7 -cit -
RW-8 -cit -/54.35-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft. RW-9 -cft -
RW-10 -cft -Any leaks observed: No·
Describe repairs conducted·
Air line from compressor was broken again. This time it was replaced with galvanized plumbing from out of the building to the ground. This should eliminate the problem with the PVC getting too hot and becoming weak enough to eventually break. I also noticed a significant amount of oil in the air line. There appeared to be more oil in the line than the last time it broke. The compressor was restarted but it kept shutting on and off repeatedly and this would trip the breaker every time. I checked the oil level and it appeared to be fine. I attempted to contact Ingersoll Rand to hel ptroubleshoot the compressor, but I could not get in touch with anyone to assist me.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 6/12/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 585,430.08 ell
RW-1 460,600.45 ell
RW-2 146,476.82 cft
RW-3 81,610.69 cft
RW-4 162,898.78 ell
RW-5 224,444.56 ell
RW-6 205,158.62 cft
RW-7 265,414.08 ell
RW-8 510,414.08 cft
RW-9 89,367.80 ell
RW-10 142,668.87 cft
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
-
44.85 Point
57.30 SF-1
59.70 SF-1
54.07 SF-2
56.15 SF-2
44.57
58.53
Nonroutine Hours
1.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 20
Influent 19
Effluent 19
51.64 (57.44-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 It.
59.70
62.16 Any leaks observed: No
System was down upon arrival. I spoke with a Technician from Ingersoll Rand and he informed me that the
oil level may not appear low, but it may be low enough to trigger the low oil level switch that would result in
the compressor shutting on and off. He informed me that if the level was down enough that when the
compressor started up it rocked the oil level switch just enough that it would trigger the switch. He also
informed me that the reason the oil had dropped so much and went in to the line was a direct result of the
compressor being set on the idle mode. When the compressor idles like it was set up by the last technician
it will put more oil in to the air line, hence lowering the level of the compressor. I added 1.5 quarts of oil to
the compressor andrestarted the system. The compressor was running fine. I then decided to take the
compressor off the idle mode to keep the oil from getting in to the air lines. I adjusted the system until
it was running at its optimal potential. It is now set up where it will run for approximately 3 minutes and then
will shut off for about 7 minutes. The compressor will tum on when the air pressure in the tank read around
35-40 psi and shut off the compressor at approximately 130 psi.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 6/17 /02 ..
Amy Icenhour
Was the system running upon anival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 597,041.50 cit
RW-1 464,185.20 cit
RW-2 147,122.37 cit
RW-3 82,249.68 cit
RW-4 163,624.38 cit
RW-5 225,885.28 cit
RW-6 207,593.92 cit
RW-7 266,747.12 cit
RW-8 -cit
RW-9 89,833.90 cit
RW-10 143,344.82 cit
. Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
55.25 Point
58.00 SF-1
51.55 SF-1
50.50 SF-2
56.46 SF-2
46.20
54.60
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
. Pressure (PSI)
Influent 18
Effluent 18
Influent 18
Effluent 17
54.08 (59.88-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
59.60
62.22 Any leaks observed: No
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
July 11, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER ~ r33-'3A -.. .!--.. ➔ AIY1'P.
=. ·.',f.
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
6-28 through 7-08
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-Statesville Site. These
forms cover the dates from 6/28/02 through 7 /08/02. Any work performed during the
weekly visit is explained in detail on the system check form.
If you liave any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
r
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 6/28102
Amy Icenhour
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 606,658.33 cft
RW-1 467,229.93 cit
RW-2 147,635.30 cit
RW-3 82,757.47 cit
RW-4 164,165.00 cit
RW-5 227,109.41 cit
RW-6 209,823.12 cit
RW-7 267,742.64 cit
RW-8 -cit
RW-9 90,199.76 cit
RW-10 143,887.34 cit
Descrtbe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
-
36.57 Point
55.30 SF-1
38.90 SF-1
35.72 SF-2
39.70 SF-2
40.50
40.16
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent -
Effluent -
Influent -
Effluent -
40.65 /46.45-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
44.20
56.00 Any leaks observed: No
Received page at around 7:00 on 6127102. Fax received at office said that there was an alarm as a
result of no power. Left for site the following afternoon. Power was off due to a tripped breaker. This was
most likely from the severe thunderstorms we received the night before. Reset the system and turned back
on. The air line from the compressor was broken again. Amy could not find the parts to replace the
broken air line. Amy called Brad to inform him of what parts were needed so that we could pick them up for
repairs the following day.
Note: All readings were taken while system was not operating
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 6/29/02
Amy Icenhour
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent -cft -
RW-1 -cit -
RW-2 -cit -
RW-3 -cft -
RW-4 -cit -
RW-5 -cit -
RW-6 -cit -
RW-7 -cit -
RW-8 -cft -
RW-9 -cit -
· RW-10 -cit -
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
No
Point
SF-1
SF-1
SF-2
SF-2
Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
2.0
2.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent -
Effluent -
· Influent -
Effluent -
No
Replaced air line coming out of air compressor with galvanized plumbing. Restarted system. System
appeared to be running fine through three cycles. Left s~e.
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 7/3/02
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours Nonroutine Hours
Amy Icenhour 3.0
Brad Burdick 4.5
Was the system running upon arrival: No upon leaving: No
Flow Meter Readings: Sand Filler Readings
Effluent 611,395.68 ell -While TP #2 is running.
RW-1 468,487.79 ell 37.40 Point Pressure (PSI)
RW-2 147,911.04 ell 36.30 SF-1 Influent
RW-3 83,020.27 ell 38.90 SF-1 Effluent
RW-4 164,456.58 ell 35.53 SF-2 Influent
RW-5 227,706.84 ell 39.55 SF-2 Effluent
RW-6 216,529:85 ell 40.35
RW-7 268,269.85 ell 40.00
RW-8 -ell 40.80 (46.60-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
RW-9 90,403.39 ell 44.10
RW-10 144,217.02 ell 42.86 Any leaks observed: No
Describe repairs conducted·
Upon arrival air line was broken again. Excessive amounts of oil were noticed on the broken plumbing
lines. Main power was shut off. Spoke with Ingersoll-Rand in regards to plumbing continually breaking
and the oil seen in air lines. Discussed operation of system in detail with Butch from Ingersoll-Rand and
described what was going on. He informed me that due to the excessive starting and stopping of the
system over the past few years that it has most likely caused excessive wear and tear on the pumps of
the compressor. He informed me that after this kind of usage the pumps were most likely in need of
servicing. He also stated that the o-rings of the pump were also probably worn to the point that it was
allowing excessive amounts of oil to be introduced to the outgoing aidines. This oil in the air lines
is extremely corrosive to PVC cement. It was eating right through the glue and creating breakage.
We set up a time to meet on-site so he could troubleshoot the system. Met Butch on-Site at 2:30.
-
-
-
-
He took a look at the compressor and determined he was correct about the pumps needing to be
re-machined and new o-rings put in. Due to the inability to get the pumps out of the tight area they were in
he informed me he could come back to take the pump apart, take the parts back to the shop for machining,
and then return to put the serviced parts back in the compressor. He said.he could perform the entire
job for an amount of around $2,000.00. He also suggested that we install a coalescent filter on the air line
to filter out any oil in the future. He said this would cost around $300.00. He told me he would call me
on Friday top arrange a time to remove the pump.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 7/5/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent -cit -
RW-1 -cit -
RW-2 -cit -
RW-3 -cit -
RW-4 -cit -
RW-5 -cit -
RW-6 -cit -
RW-7 -cit -
RW-8 -cit -
RW-9 -cit -
RW-10 -cit -
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
No
Point
SF-1
SF-1
SF-2
SF-2
Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
4.0
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent -
Effluent -
Influent -
Effluent -
No
Met with Butch from Ingersoll-Rand on-site to remove pump parts from compressor. Butch removed parts
and took them to his shop for servicing.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 7/6/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent -cit -
RW-1 -cit -
RW-2 -cit -
RW-3 -cit -
RW-4 -cit -
RW-5 -cit -
RW-6 -cit -
RW-7 -cit -
RW-8 -cit -
RW-9 -cit -
RW-10 -cit -
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
No
Point
SF-1
SF-1
SF-2
SF-2
Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
4.0
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent -
Effluent -
Influent -
Effluent -
No
Met Butch from Ingersoll Rand on-site to install newly machined parts and o-rings. He could not get the filter
until Monday morning. He installed the newly machined parts on the compressor and re-started the
compressor. The compressor was running fine with the new parts. I could not fix the air line on the
compressor without the coalescent filter. Butch said he would call me on Monday and meet me at the site
to install the new filter and replace thew damaged air line.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
Date· 7/8/02
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours Nonroutine Hours
Brad Burdick 3.0 2.5
Was the system running upon arrival: No upon leaving: Yes
Flow Meter Readings: Sand Filter Readings
Effluent -cit -While TP #2 is running.
RW-1 468,499.32 cit 36.55 Point Pressure (PSI)
RW-2 147,918.50 cit 48.02 SF-1 Influent 22
RW-3 83,028.47 cit 42.40 SF-1 Effluent 21
RW-4 164,464.23 cit 37.13 SF-2 Influent 21
RW-5 227,713.02 cit 55.24 SF-2 Effluent 21
RW-6 216,535.00 cit 43.35
RW-7 268,279.70 cit 58.08
RW-8 517,308.24 cit 48.88 (54.68-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 fl.
RW-9 90,409.32 cit 59.00
RW-10 144,225.72 cit 59.86 Any leaks observed: No
Describe repairs conducted·
Ingersoll Rand delivered filter to site. I traveled to the plumbing store to pick up the necessary parts to
install the coalescent filter and fix the air lines. I replaced the broken PVC fitting and installed the fittings .
for the filter. After installing the new plumbing I waited approximately 20 minutes or so to allow the glue to
dry. Re-started the system and watched it run for a couple of cycles. The system was running fine. I went
to collect the weekly measurements. After collecting the weeklies from RW-5 through RW-1 0 the air line
from the compressor broke again. After inspecting the broken plumbing it appeared to be a result of vibration
and movement of the plumbing. I repaired the plumbing and this time I secured the line with some tie straps.
This time when it was re-started, the air line was secure with little vibration or movement I then went to
collect ihe remaining measurements from the recovery wells.
Note: Measurements from RW-1, RW-2, RW-3, and RW-4 were colected immediately after the
system was restarted. Therefore, the water levels may appear to be higher than normal.
. •. ,, '·-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
August 6, 2002
Mr.Joseph Ferentz·
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5430 Metric Place -Suite I 00
Norcross, Georgia 30092
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-Statesville Site. These
· forms cover the dates from 7 /15/02 through 8/6/02. Any work performed during the
weekly visit is explained in detail on the system check form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely:
Applied Earth. Sciente1, Inc ..
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
. 434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite 8 • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 7/15/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 628,635.27 cft
RW-1 473,603.32 cft
RW-2 148,903.25 cft
RW-3 83,950.67 cft
RW-4 165,529.87 cft
RW-5 229,784.02 cft
RW-6 228,617.02 cft
RW-7 270,456.02 cft
RW-8 521,904.00 cft
RW-9 91,121.02 cft
RW-10 145,259.35 cft
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
53.90 Point
56.04 SF-1
44.92 SF-1
46.37 SF-2
56.48 SF-2
42.35
50.40
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 21
Effluent 21
Influent 20
Effluent 20
50.45 (56.25-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
59.79
62.38 Any leaks observed: No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 7/26102
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 652,464.50 cit
RW-1 481,376.98 cit
RW-2 150,200.38 cit
RW-3 85,246.40 ell
RW-4 166,939.90 cit
RW-5 232,555.30 cit
RW-6 238,242.25 cit
RW-7 272,726.52 cit
RW-8 526,423.02 cit
RW-9 92,030.85 cit
RW-10 146,617.72 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
57.40 Point
59.00 dry at 59' SF-1
50.82 SF-1
44.20 SF-2
56.45 SF-2
46.96
54.01
----------
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 21
Effluent 21
Influent 20
Effluent 20
58.77 (54.68-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 fl.
59.67
62.46 Any leaks observed: No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 7129/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrlval:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 657,666.70 cit
RW-1 483,161.92 cit
RW-2 150,497.64 cit
RW-3 85,540.92 cit
RW-4 167,253.54 cit
RW-5 233,165.00 cit
RW-6 239,594.90 cit
RW-7 273,369.13 cit
RW-8 529,031.23 cit
RW-9 92,230.97 cit
RW-10 146,921.43 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
57.79 Point
59.00 dry at 59' SF-1
50.65 SF-1
49.40 SF-2
55.55 SF-2
46.74
56.94
Nonrouline Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings·
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 21
Effluent 21
Influent 20
Effluent 20
53.05 (58.85-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 fl.
59.75
62.40 Any leaks observed: No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
Date: 8/6/02
I
!Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon anival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 674,073.70 cit
RW-1 488,609.85 cit
RW-2 151,412.01 cit
RW-3 86,417.42 cit
RW-4 168,214.09 cit
RW-5 235,052.80 cit
RW-6 243,811.90 ell
RW-7 275,101.01 cit
RW-8 534,211.09 cit
. RW-9 92,850.27 ell
RW-10 147,857.72 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
58.20 Point
57.59 SF-1
48.94 SF-1
45.95 SF-2
56.65 SF-2
46.85
51.52
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
r Pressure (PSI)
Influent 22
Effluent 21
Influent 21
Effluent 20
53.20 /59.00-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft .
59.59
62.05 Any leaks observed: No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
August 23, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5430 Metric Place -Suite 100
Norcross, Georgia 30092
DOWIIElff ~NlUWFQ Rf.}cl\}l~l~
~ R.. c__.
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-StatesviJle Site. These
forms cover the dates of 8/15/02 and 8/23/02. Any work performed during the weekly
visit is explained in detail on the system check form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 8/15/02
Jill Lemacks
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Nonroutine Hours
Was the system running upon arrival: Yes upon leaving: Yes
Flow Meter Readings: Sand Filter Readings
Effluent 691,972.34 cf! -While TP #2 is running.
. RW-1 494,295.76 cf! 58.98 Point Pressure (PSI)
RW-2 152,198.35 cf! 58.49 SF-1 Influent 20
RW-3 87,304.89 cf! 49.56 SF-1 Effluent 20
RW-4 169,199.38 cf! 46.87 SF-2 Influent 22
RW-5 235,793.76 cft ~..87.54 SF-2 Effluent 20
RW-6 248,264.34 cf! A'l'47.15
RW-7 275,704.06 cf! 52.73
RW-8 558,804.92 cf! 54.78 (60.58-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
RW-9 93,480.30 cf! 59.57
RW-10 • 11!'8,624.80 cf! 63.15 Any leaks observed: No
Describe repairs conducted·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 8/23/02
Jill Lemacks
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 720,195.83 cf!
RW-1 499,583.70 cf!
RW-2 153,108.61 cf!
RW-3 · 88,125.54 cit
RW-4 169,876.32 cf!
RW-5 236,489.20 cf!
RW-6 252,591.13 cf!
RW-7 276,403.20 cf!
RW-8 576,530.89 cf!
RW-9 93,957.11 cit
RW-10 1$9,302.08 cit
Pesccibe repairs conducted· . .
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
59.10 Point
58.88 SF-1
49.73 SF-1
47.13 SF-2
57.83 SF-2
47.79
52.91
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 21
Effluent 21
Influent 20
Effluent 21
54.92 (60. 72-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
59.68
63.29 Any leaks observed: No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
August 30, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5430 Metric Place -Suite 100
Norcross, Georgia 30092
DOWMD"I UMOIOlNlJPWUi R Fiv 13'3 -~ 3 A
AL...ri._!)
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Form
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed fa the weekly system check form for the FCX-Statesville. Site. This
form covers the date of 8/30/02: Any work performed during the weekly visit 1s .
explained in detail on the system check form,
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely; ..
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
'l,,
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
I
I
Date· 8/30/02
I
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
I Brad Burdick and Jimmy Gamertsfelder 3.0
Was the system running upon arrival: Yes
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 721,079.30 cit -
RW-1 503,840.62 cit 59.12 Point
RW-2 154,060.43 cit 57.00 SF-1
RW-3 88,826.80 cit 49.38 SF-1
RW-4 170,844.65 cit 49.37 SF-2
RW-5 240,296.50 cit 56.74 SF-2
RW-6 255,855.70 cit 47.61
RW-7 280,111.32 cit 55.87
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #'2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 18
Effluent 19
Influent 19
Effluent 18
RW-8 596,462.00 cit 53.25 (59.05-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 fl.
RW-9 94,521.05 cit 59.66
RW-10 150,399.10 cit · 62.45 Any leaks observed: No
Describe repairs conducted·
I Aug-26-02 09:54A Applied Earth Sciences 704 795-7076
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 8126/02
OOCUMEHTOOHJROL
CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL
FCX • ST ATESVJLLE
AES PROJECT NO. 1S3-92001-tl2
SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT NO. 0012435
To: Joe Ferentz Phone: [phone]
Roy F. Weslon, Inc. Fax: [phone]
From: Brad Burdick
Slaff Scientist
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Comments/Recommended Actions:
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
The following describes out-of-scope work activities perfonned at the FCX site in Statesville, NC. All of the
following work is related to lhe servicing and machining of the pumps for the air compressor by Ingersoll-Rand.
The following describes the work performed by AES personnel and any sub-contractor used.
Project Management (Proposal preparation, sub-
contractor coordination, and parts ordering.)
Administrative Expenses
Ingersoll-Rand Labor, Equipment and Materials
Air comprcs$0f pump machining and complete
O\'crhaul, plus purchase of coalescent filter
June 28, 2002
Air line broken on air compressor. (traveled to stor~
to pick up necessary supplies , dig beneath g,ound
lo tind a section of line to attach to, install new
air lines)
July 3. 2002
· Sub-cclntractor coordination in office. Made several
phone calls regarding problem with compressor air lines
breakage and problem with oil in lines. Spoke with a
few people at Ingersoll-Rand and set up time
to meet 'in the field.
2.0 hours @ 65/hr $130.00
Lump Sum $227.48
Lump Sum $2,274.80
4.SO hours @ 65/bour $292.50
I.SO hours @65/hour $97.50
P.02
1 Aug-26-02 09: 54A Appl -ted Earth Sc-tences 704 795-7076
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-·
Mr. Joseph Fermtz
August 26, 2002
Page2
Mel on site with Ingersoll-Rand to troubleshoot
air compressor. Discussed worlc needed
July S. 2002
Mel with Ingersoll Rand on she 10 remove
compressor pump for servicing.
July 6. 2002
Mel with Ingersoll Rand on site to replace
serviced compressor pump and o-rings
July 8. 2002
Mel with Ingersoll-Rand on site to install
coalescent fiher on air line
Proposal Accepted:
Roy. F. Weston. Inc.
Sincerely,
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
5 .0 hours @65/bour $325.00
4.0 hours@ 65/hour $260.00
4.0 hours @ 65/hour $260.00
2 .0 hours @ 65/hour $130.00
Total: $3997.28
¥2¢2-
Date
P.03
I ":ug-2.6-02 09:54A Appl 1ed Earth Sciences 704 795-7076 P.04
INGERSOLL-RAND® INGERSOLL-RAND AIR CENTER
151 Peddycord Park Dr.
Kernersville, NC 27284
336-722-5177
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT
I-
I-
I
AIR COMPRESSORS
lnl, II, ,I ,I I ... " 1,1, I, I, ,I,, I .. II,, ,I, I, I .. I .. , II, I .. I, I, I, I
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES
814 DAVIDSON DR NW
CONCORD NC 28025-4324
TOTAi. OUT&TNIOIMe
2,274.80 2,274.80 .. __ __
n,-, .... ~ Tll•"•
,--' L __ ••oo7693 __ .
REMIT CHECKS ONLY TO:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
AIR SOLUTIONS GROUP
P .O, BOX 75817
CHARLO'ITE, NC. 28275-5817
ANC)l,lfl DUI I ---. ·-1
2,274.00 I
2,274.80
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PLEASE RETURN THIS BOTTOM PORTION WITH YOUR REMITTANCE,
Ol/ll/200; 11416712 2,27t.BC
I I . -··--'------'-------~
REMIT TO:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
AIR SOLUTIONS GROUP
P.O. BOX nB17
CIIARLOTTE, NC. 28275-5817
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES
l---------,,007693
07/31/2002 =~=="----------·-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
D
I
I
CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL
FCX -STATESVILLE
AES PROJECT NO. 153-92001-02
SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT NO. 0012435
Date: 8/26/02
To: Joe Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
From: Brad Burdick
Staff Scientist
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Comments/Recommended Actions:
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
· Fax: [phone]
The following descnbes out-,of-scope work activities performed at the FCX site in Statesville, NC. All of the
following work is related to.the servicing and machining of the pumps for the air compressor by Ingersoll-Rand.
The. foUowing descnbes the work performed by AES Pl'fSODDel and any sub-contractor used.
Project Management (Proposal preparation, sub-
contractor coordination, and parts ordering.)
Administrative Expenses
Ingersoll-Rand Labor, Equipment and Materials
Air compressor pump machining and complete
Overhaul, plus purchase of coalescent filter
Labor
June 28, 2002
Air line broken on air compressor. (traveled to store
to pick up necessary supplies , dig beneath ground
to find a section of line to attach to, install new
air lines)
July 3, 2002
Sub-contractor coordination in office. Made several
phone calls regarding problem with compressor air _lines
breakage and problem with oil in lines. Spoke with a ...
few people at Ingersoll-Rand and set up time .
to meet in the field.
2.0 hours@ 65/hr $130.00
Lump Sum $227.48
Lump Sum $2,274.80
4.50 hours@ 65/hour $292.50
1.50 hours @65/hour $97.50
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
August 26, 2002
Page2
Met on site with Ingers_oll-Rand to troubleshoot
air compressor. Discussed work needed
July 5, 2002
Met with Ingersoll Rand on site to remove
compressor pump for servicing.
July 6, 2002
Met with Ingersoll Rand on site to replace
serviced compressor pump and o-rings
July 8, 2002
Met with Ingersoll-Rand on site to install
coalescent filter on air line
Proposal Accepted:
Roy. F. Weston, Inc.
Sincerely,
APPLIED EARffl SCIENCES, INC
Brad Burdick
· Project Scientist
5 .0 hours @65/bour $325.00
4.0 hours @ 65/bour $260.00
4.0 hours @ 65/bour $260.00
2.0 hours @ 65/bour $130.00
Total: $3997.28
Date
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
August 30, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Weston Solutions, Inc.
5430 Metric Place -Suite 100
Norcross, Georgia 30092
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Form
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed is the weekly system check form for the FCX-Statesville Site. This
form covers the dates of9/6/02, 9/13/02, and 9/19/02. Any work performed during the
weekly visit is explained in detail on the system check form.
·. If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist ·
434 Copperfield Bivd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
D
I
Date: 9/6/02
I
IJill Lemacks
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 722,184.24 cit
RW-1 504,823.56 cit
RW-2 154.900.22 cit
RW-3 89,602.15 cit
RW-4 171,765.08 cit
RW-5 241,153.90 cit
RW-6 256,901.23 cit
RW-7 281,602.31 cit
RW-8 600,204.21 cit
RW-9 95,263.88 cit
RW-10 151,086.12 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
59.13 Point
56.96 SF-1
49.41 SF-1
49.52 SF-2
56.64 SF-2
47.53
55.93
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 21
Influent 19
Effluent 20
53.42 (59.22-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
59.70
62.91 Any leaks observed:: · No·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 9/13/02
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours Nonroutine Hours
Brad Burdick and Jimmy Gamertsfelder 3.0
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 746,292.05 cft -
RW-1 512,411.90 cft 56.55
RW-2 155,537.39 cft 57.43
RW-3 90,168.62 cft 57.02
RW-4 172,310.52 cft 46.32
RW-5 243,233.26 cft 56.56
RW-6 262,878.15 cft 47.76
RW-7 282,859.65 cft 55.54
RW-8 623,187.58 cft 53.18
RW-9 95,463.69 cft 59.70
RW-10 152,028.05 cft 61.61
Describe repairs conducted·
Yes upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Point Pressure (PSI)
SF-1 Influent
SF-1 Effluent
SF-2 Influent
SF-2 Effluent
(58.98-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 It
Any leaks observed:
20
19
19
18
No
Replaced compressor air filter and changed oiVReplaced light bulb.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
I
ll
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
Date: 9/19/02
I
!Jimmy Gamertsfelder
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 757,186.24 cit
RW-1 516,153.26 cit
RW-2 156,342.26 cit
RW-3 90,737.60 cit
RW--4 172,978.36 cit
RW-5 244,548.89 cit
RW-6 266,029.68 cit
RW-7 284,073.95 cit
RW-8 656,124.25 cit
RW-9 95,878.46 cit
RW-10 152,760.33 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. F rent Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
58.60 Point
57.41 SF-1
49.71 SF-1
46.05 SF0 2
56.67 SF-2
47.55
54.07
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 24
Effluent 24
Influent 22
Effluent 22
52.38 (58.18-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
59.68
61.73 Any leaks observed: No
u
D,
I
I
I
I
u
I
I
I
I
••·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
October 7, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Weston Solutions, Inc.
5430 Metric Place -Suite 100
Norcross, Georgia 30092
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Form
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
OOCUMENTCONTROLNUMlBER ~ i3J-2.F
M,...~ -·
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-Statesville Site. These
forms cover the time period from 8/6/02 through 10/4/02. Per our conversation, please
discard all system check forms that are dated after 7 /29/02. These old system check
forms are to be disposed of as a result of the spurious number readings from recovery
. well RW-8. These new system check forms have been updated and corrected. Any
work performed during the weekly visit is explained in detail on the system check form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc. ·
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite 8 • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
I-
I
g
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
1:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 8/6/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 674,073.70 cit
RW-1 488,609.85 cit
RW-2 151,412.01 cit
RW-3 86,417.42 cit
RW-4 168,214.09 cit
RW-5 235,052.80 cit
RW-6 243,811.90 cit
RW-7 275,101.01 cit
RW-8 -cit
RW-9 92,850.27 cit
RW-10 147,857.72 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
58.20 Point
57.59 SF-1
48.94 SF-1
45.95 SF-2
56.65 SF-2
46.85
51.52
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filler Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 22
Effluent 21
Influent 21
Effluent 20
53.20 (59.00-5.80)-New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.: I •-•-••• -• ' • ' • • • • •
59.59 ;r:\:-_• ..
I-•......... ·-...... .
62.05 Any lea~~: ()bserved: : ·
••
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 8/15/02
Jill Lemacks
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 691,972.34 cfl
RW-1 494,295.76 cit
RW-2 152,198.35 cfl
RW-3 87,304.89 cit
RW-4 169,199.38 cit
RW-5 235,793.76 cfl
RW-6 · 248,264.34 cfl
RW-7 275,704.06 cfl
RW-8 -cfl
RW-9 93,480.30 cit
RW-10 148,624.80 cit
Pescdbe repairs conducted·
· SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
-
Yes
-
58.98 Point
58.49 SF-1
49.56 SF-1
46.87 SF-2
87.54 SF-2
47,15
52.73 . --··
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Fitter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 20
Influent 22
Effluent 20
54.78 (60.58-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 fl •. ·
59.57
63.15 · Any leaks observed: • · iNo ..
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I
I
d.
u·
b
Date· 8/23/02
Jill Lemaeks
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings: ·
Effluent 720,195.83 ell
RW-1 499,583.70 ell
RW-2 153,108.61 ell
RW-3 88,125.54 ell
RW-4 169,876.32 ell
RW-5 236,489.20 ell
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
59.10 Point
58.88 SF-1
49.73 SF-1
47.13 SF-2
57.83 SF-2
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 21
Effluent 21
Influent 20
Effluent 21,
RW-6 252,591.13 ell · 47.79
RW-7 276,403.20 ell 52.91
RW-8 -ell 54.92
RW-9 93,957.11 ell 59.68
(60.72-5.BO)New pipe extension. is 5.80 fl.
RW-10 149,302.08 ' ell 63.29 Any leaks observEif __ -··--~--'----·.:..;Nc:co_· ___ _
Descrjbe repairs conducted·
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
Date· 8/30/02
SYSTEM CHECK FORM.
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours Nonroutine Hours
Brad Burdick and Jimmy Gamertsfelder 3.0
Was the system running upon arrival: Yes upon leaving: Yes
Flow Meter Readings: Sand Filter Readings
Effluent 721,079.30 cit -While TP #2 is running.
RW-1 503,840.62 cit 59.12 Point Pressure (PSI)
RW-2 154,060.43 cit 57.00 SF-1 Influent 18
RW-3 88,826.80 cit 49.38 SF-1 Effluent 19
RW-4 170,844.65 cit 49.37 SF-2 Influent 19
RW-5 240,296.50 cit 56.74 SF-2 Effluent 18
RW-6_ 255,855.70 cit 47.61
RW-7 280,111.32 cft 55.87
RW-8 -cit 53.25 (59.0~.B0)New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
RW-9· 94,521.05 cit 59.66
RW-10 150,399.10 cit 62.45
Describe repairs conducted·
I
I
I
I
I
I '.-'
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
n
D
Date· 9/6/02
I
IJill Lemacks ·
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 722,184.24 cit
RW-1 504,823.56 cit
RW-2 154.900.22 cit
RW-3 89,602.15 cit
RW-4 171,765.08 cit
RW-5 241,153.90 cit
RW-6 256,901.23 cit
RW-7 281,602.31 cit
RW-8 -cit
RW-9 95,263.88 cit
RW-10 151,086.12 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
59.13 Point
56.96 SF-1
49.41 SF-1
49.52 SF-2
56.64 SF-2
47.53
55.93
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 21
Influent 19
Effluent 20
53.42 (59.22-5.80) Nev,_ pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
59.70
62.91
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
Date: 9/13/02
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
Brad Burdick and Jimmy Gamertsfelder 3.0
Was the system running upon arrival: Yes
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 746,292.05 cit -
RW-1 512,411.90 cit 56.55 Point
RW-2 155,537.39 cit 57.43 SF-1
RW-3 90,168.62 cit 57.02 SF-1
RW-4 172,310.52 cit 46.32 SF-2
RW-5 243,233.26 cit 56.56 SF-2
RW-6 262,878.15 cit 47.76
RW-7 282,859.65 cit 55.54
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving:· Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 19
Influent 19
Effluent 18
RW-8 -cit 53.18 (58. 98-5. 80) New pipe extension is 5. 80 ft.
RW-9 95,463.69 cit 59.70
RW-10 152,028.05 cit 61.61 Any leii~~ e>bserved: . No
Pescnbe repairs conducted·
Replaced compressor air filter and changed oil/Replaced light bulb.
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 9/19/02
I
!Jimmy Gamertsfelder
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 757,186.24 cft
RW-1 516,153.26 cft
RW-2 156,342.26 cft
RW-3 90,737.60 cft
RW-4 172,978.36 cft
RW-5 244,548.89 cft
RW-6 266,029.68 cft
RW-7 284,073.95 cft
RW-8 -cft
RW-9 95,878.46 cft
RW-10 152,760.33 cft
Pescdbe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
58.60 Point
57.41 SF-1
49.71 SF-1
46.05 SF-2
56.67 SF-2
47.55
54.07
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 24
Effluent 24
Influent 22
Effluent 22
52.38
59.68
61.73
(58.18--5.80) New pipe extension is 5,Bo ft._
Any leaks o_bserved: No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 9124102
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
· Routine Hours Nonroutine Hours
Brad Burdick 3.0 6.0
Was the system running upon arrival: Yes upon leaving: Yes
Flow Meter Readings: Sand Filter Readings
Effluent 765,811.82 cft -While TP #2 is running.
RW-1 519,163.20 cit 58.88 Point Pressure (PSI)
RW-2 156,886.40 cft 59.00 dry at 59.00 SF-1 Influent 22
RW-3 91,190.90 cit 54.65 SF-1 Effluent 22
RW-4 173,494.08 cft 49.20 SF-2 Influent 21
RW-5 245,595.32 cft 56.67 SF-2 Effluent 20
RW-6 268,551.23 cft 48.35
RW-7 285,042.15 cft 56.16
RW-8 558,470.01 cft 53.18 (58. 98-5. 80) New pipe extension is 5. 80 ft.
RW-9 96,210.82 cft 59.66
RW-10 153,337.82 cft 57.30 Any leaks observed: _____ ___ _ _____ c.:N.::.o ____ _
Describe repairs conducted·
Performed weekly meter readings and O&M. Inspected all effluent meters on RW pumps top determine
if they were operating properly. All meters appeared to be working properly.
Installed plumbing from pond to shed to run electrical wires. Ran conduit inside system shed and pulled
float switch electrical wires through to main system panel. Also, pumped water out of pond back into
system influent tank.
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 10/4/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 784,216.85 cit
RW-1 525,055.40 cit
RW-2 158,125.00 cit
RW-3 92,070.95 cit
· RW-4 174,570.42 cit
RW-5 247,711.15 cit
RW-6 273,557.75 ell
RW-7 286,968.22 ell
RW-8 563,090.26 ell
RW-9 96;893.32 cit
RW-10 154,480.28 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
. Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
57.25 Point
53.30 SF-1
52.15 SF-1
47.32 SF-2
56.80 SF-2
48.15
55.65
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While tP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 22
Effluent 21
Influent 21
Effluent 20
50.67 (56.47-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 fl.
59.55
58.44 Any leaks observed: No
There are a few wells which do not have the proper regulator installed on ttie recovery pump. During the next
site visit I will get the exact number of regulators in need of replacement AES recommends that these new
regulators be installed as soon as possible in order to optimize the performance of the recovery pumps.
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
November 5, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Weston Solutions, Inc.
DOWMIK' COHJRaKUPWft¢f't~3 J-s~
5430 Metric Place-Suite 100
Norcross, Georgia 30092
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Form
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
A\-~
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-Statesville Site. These forms
cover the time period from 10/10/02 through 11/01/02. Any work performed during the
weekly visit is explained in detail on .the system check form.
Also enclosed are copies of the well purge records and groundwater elevation
measurements collected during the semi-annual sampling event of October 2002.
The floppy disc enclosed contains photographs taken at the site. These photographs were
taken to show some of the damaged well casings and erosion occurring on site.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
~~~
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite 8 • Concord, North Carolina 2802S • Tel: [phone]S • fax: (704) 79S-7076
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 10/10/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 797,616.85 ell
RW-1 528,755.56 ell
RW-2 163,636.35 ell
RW-3 92,920.25 cit
RW-4 175;220.28 ell
RW-5 249,129.27 ell
RW-6 281,202.89 ell
RW-7 288,231.80 ell
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
56.56 Point
54.00 SF-1
52.16 SF-1
48.16 SF-2
56.50 SF-2
50.50
55,68
Nonroutine Hours
.
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 20
Influent 19
Effluent 18
·· RW-8 565,790.25 ell · .51.26 · (56.47-5.80) New pipe extension ;is.BO ft.•·
RW-9 97,382.50 cit . 58.86.
· RW-10 · 155,206.13 ell ·58.67 · Any leaks oiiseN.ed: _ __ •. ____ -'---'----· -'-N-'. o'-·-· ___ _
.· Describe repairs conducted·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 10/17/02
I
IBrad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent -cit -
RW-1 -cit -
RW-2 -cit -
RW-3 -cit -
RW-4 -cit -
RW-5 -cit -
RW-6 -cit -
· RW-7 -cit -
RW-8 · -cit -
RW-9 -cit -
. RW-10 ": -: cit -
. Describe repairs conducted· .
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
Point
SF-1
SF-1
SF-2
SF-2
.
Nonroutine Hours
2.0
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings .
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent -
Effluent -
Influent -.
Effluent -
Any leaks observed:·· ______ --· ______ ._N_o _____ ... ····-·-··-·
, · .. During theweekly check it~ observed that there was no:air being.delivered to the recovery wells.·-,
The air compressor was running as designed I · I took apart the plumbing on the outlet side of the air compressor and there was no air being
delivered. Therefore, it was determined that the solenoid valve at the air outlet had gone bad.
I
I
I
I
I
I
The system was turned off.
Also; the city of Statesville arrived on site at 10:00 to cut down the weeds and grass inside the fenced area
and along the street
· At approximately 10:30 SEH Electrical arrived onsite to wire the pond float switch.to the PLC in the control
panel.
During this site visit the pond was drained until it was almost empty.
During this visit an inventory was collected on the regulators for the recovery pumps. Only two of the recovery
pumps had the new regulator recommended by the pump manufacturer. The remaining pumps have old
regulators. RW-1 and RW-2 are the pumps with the new regulators.
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 10/22/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 804970.85 ell
RW-1 532,517.39 ell
RW-2 169,198.32 ell
RW-3 93,174.16 ell
RW-4 175,886.39 ell
RW-5 250,537.80 ell
RW-6 288,642.20 cit
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
· Routine Hours
3.0
No
-
38.65 Point
37.55 SF-1
40.50 SF-1
37.90 SF-2
41.56 SF-2
42.35
Nonroutine Hours
2.0
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 22
Effluent 21
Influent 21
Effluent 20
. RW-7 289;527.20 ell 41.09
..
RW-8 568,844.00 ell 40.45 (46.25-5.80) New pipe_i,xtension is 5.80 ft.
RW-9 97,728.86 ell 45.20.
RW-10 155,918.20 ell 44.17 Any_leakj_o~½rv.ed: ________ •····-----N_o _____ ,, .. _.,., __ _
· Descnbe repairs conducted·
The above data was collected during the semi-annual sampling event The system was still down at the time .. ··
this data was collected.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 10/23/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent . cit .
RW-1 -cit .
RW-2 . cit .
RW-3 . cit .
RW-4 -cit .
RW-5 . cit .
RW-6 -cit .
RW-7 . cit -
RW-8 -cit .
RW-9 . cit .
RW-10 . cit .
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
· Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
No
Point
SF-1
SF-1
SF-2
SF-2
Nonroutine Hours
1.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent .
Effluent .
Influent .
Effluent .
No
During the semklnnuaf sampling event the solenoid valve on the air compressor was replaced .with a new one.
The system was then turned back on. All the recovery wells were checked and they were getting air delivered
to the pumps. The system was monitored for approximately 20 minutes and was running as designed.
System influent and effluent samples were then collected.
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 11/1/02
Jimmy Gamertsfelder
Was the system ronning upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 812,324.70 cit
RW-1 534,751.88 cit
RW-2 183,908.62 cit
RW-3 93,553.18 cit
RW-4 176,314.25 cit
RW-5 251,467.10 cit
RW-6 300,931.40 cit
RW-7 290,420.92 cit
· RW-8 570,627.75 cit
RW-9 98,053.98 cit
RW-10 156,419.TT cit
· Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
-
37.65 Point
37.17 SF-1
39.84 . SF-1
36.75 SF-2
40.68 SF-2
40.93
40.92
Noriroutine Hours
0.5
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 26
Effluent 26
Influent 24
Effluent 24
41.36
44.TT
43.54
(47.16-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.·
Any leaks observed: Yes·
System was running but no air was being delivered to pumps:·· Found that plug had come off the solenoid
valve where the air line exiis .the building. I reconnected the solenoid plug arid heard it open aftertuming
air compressor switch back on. I heard water start flowing within a few seconds and I observed a full cycle
of all systems withing 20 minutes. Everything seemed to be workirig okay from that point The electrical
conduit running to the solenoid plug was tight and at an angle which could pull out the plug due to vibrations ..
· I moved the tie-down strap, holding the conduit in place, closer to the solenoid valve and provided it with more
slack to reduce the chance of disconnection again. ·
The pond was drained for approximately 20 minutes during the visit
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXC
PURGE FORMS
NORIC:\Myfiles\My Documents\Projeds\20Cl64-133 F C X\Option Year 1'D930 Report Project Perl\Jrd Semi-Amuaf Sampling Event Report\0d2002. 3rd semi-annual rpldoc
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Filing Information Fluid Level Measurements
Job No. ---=-c:-:--:::,:---ll
Job File Field File
AES P 92002--01
. Date:
Punch No Punch By:
Sheet 1 of 1
Description: FCX -----------------,---------
..
Well Casing Time Depth Depth P, eS:wat Corrected Comments
Elevation To To Ground Water
Product Water foh,1De911. Elevation
MW-1 40.fl.. 51,o.:> -
MW-2 'l<l,00 '1-t,oo
MW-3 l\o.TI 51,15
MW-4 .. 46;tr, 6'1. fO
MW-5D 'l1.'3q ::>Joo
MW-5S ?,1\.'31 c:o
MW-6O q.,_ ~ ?100
MW-6S 11\q. \' Sj.3 5
MW-7 1\0,~o .~.'3 '
MW-8 '-\'\. 0 5'f.O
MW-9. ll;J•f 11s .1
MW-10 o," '-It 0
MW-11 1., t) '.l!I, 0
~ ,
'W-23 \X-'JI), 0
W-24S t\: . ?\00
W-25S 14\.lb :>t60
W-27S ~O-i'1 '-\0.'-f,;
W-29I 1>.~o ? 100
RW-1 $P.6'6 '~ ?:J5/7.J'I
RW-2 77,$'5 I~ l9tf'.3:J
RW-3 r,f/$,o (/. '17Y,/~
Rw-4 :n-'k:J ;1.~
Rw-6 1//•f' ~~~r,7
~ ~.7~ .:JIP: ✓Vt ......
RW-7 .YI.O'I '~'Pl-~:20
RW-8 ~, ,.,,,, -~ FYtt-.xJ • -J ·.
RW-9 ~.$" .2,,:> -'17. ?;JI';/'~
RW-10 $/V,/7 l.fX' '//F,.:a,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site:·
Well ID: w-1
Water Level Indicator:
pHffemperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
•
IIJf 7>/0'1 .
-
. Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
/)_ 7~
Purge
Wl'II l'urging lkconl
FCX
Statcs\"illc, North Carolina
vo,=< ~Comm~o,(C<,ri<,, '"'M, 00M) Removed
0
·j. .·:-i • 0 v.0·7 I :n -:::q,,, I✓,
(/,q_,;,-o.07 fl. I r:y,J} n ,_ I ~1 f •
-1-Jl(.t, ~ I ,;,v ·1 ~r1 j --('A 1 a/
/ rn/U ~ r-f ,V. ,
.
-
Dale: to(zzhz. I I
Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site:
Well ID: l'(\1,v -2-
Water Level Indicator:
pHffemperaturc Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
• IDl2z. r~ ~
I
-
Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
Purge
Well !'urging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
_; I. O
Volume ~Comments(Clarity, color, odor). Removed
0
/,I? !'it, J l brl d,, n
(/
/1 A I
VfU I""
/A Aid .)U' ,~, •
·-
Date:
Page 1
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site: Ft,y_
Purge
Wcll l'uq~in,: Record
FCX
Statcs\"ille, North Carolina
-"c-,---c,c----
WclllD: YY\U,r,3
Water Lcvd Indicator:
pHffemperarure Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
. Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
It> i'Plu-
I
.
Fonn reviewed by:
Water
Level ,,, .. , ~'···'""''"''"·'""'·""" Removed
0 .
,;.;flc.Q , L, 01 K, ~ 'Wn, I . ~ ', (9 0.0·7 i<J.,, ail ~~
l_~ "'-.. 'n O.D7 /7,'v IO ✓, . -l •· j
~.~ "5. ti /).I), /"/,' //)t.1 u., s. ,o 0-'07 I 'ic f) ./hi)
s.o .:;_ I h 0-07 I<:.'. 7 11n
-
Date: Jolzz/02-r l
Page 1 ·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·-------------· ---....... ,-------·· --·····--·-···----................... ,
Purge
\\'ell l'uri:ini: Record
F('X
Starcs,·ille, Norlh Carolina
Site: f"G'(
Well ID: \:Y)IAJ-l\
Water Level Indicator:
pH/femperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column·
Date Time
-/~j pfiia) --, '
Form reviewed by:
Z.''
54:-io Y5,0S'
, ;11'/iJ/ f
Water vo,omo ~C.••~<,(a.;o,,o,m,..,I
Level Removed
0 .
Pl;i-,ot '-=:: .. 3 .J:17 //.6 9'13
--:7,D Z o:;,. ,/.:ir' ~.~·. 2Cfo
. i-9~6) 1-5, 76 . /,, < //'f?' 252..
io ~ l<,j'5 ,/;?o /(.? :;J'lt u..S-~ <.11. /.:i~ i/,9 l;2.:f_.{
~
-·
Date: 10/zz/ro I I
Page 1
.
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sile:
Well ID:
\Valer Level Indicator:
pH/femperalure Meler:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total deplh of well:
Deplh to water:
Water column:
Date Time
..
~ :i
Form reviewed by:
ti ..
Water
Level
q[J
~o
/{)O
-
Purge
W,·11 l'uri:ini: Record
FCX
StatcsYillc, North C:irolina /4,.d ~ d -J/.5
/'12 ,:)JO
_)t)~tf} ~~ ;4111
vo,om, ~C-<0"(C'ario, '""'• ""'I Removed
0 .
. ~ · r):JJ 17-:.i/40
l~:.tlf ,:Jay /1.? :;.;;i_o
£:YJ ,~,f,/ /7✓,z. .;2.7,01
-
Date:
Page 1
,-{_,,), -cf, I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sile: _-H'--'Ql----,=----
Well ID: mtv,55
Water Lev_el Indicator:
pWfemperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Tune
.
Water
Level
.
Purge
Well Purging Record
-FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
Removed · · -_
0
\Ol~tfJ
v,,_ ~c.mm=ca..,,o,Jw,..,,J
'r"l:J. I -

·

.

//.0 2 ( -0
• I J.s ~.nl .a,, n.r F.)_ ~
:J.o <;,71 ,, :-; ·17_ 7 ?7< ss ~11 ,063' If.. 7 ~<~
.
-
Form reviewed by: Date:
Page 1
--· .
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site:
Well ID: /lit~ JV
Water Level fodicator:
pH/femperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time Water
' Level
l.10 .. Ll"Jlt 'l . 17,,~/
I a,,
.-..... ~
I
-
Form reviewed by:
Well f>u rging Record
s'~/r'f/ehl
13 ·.;s-
10/JJ/Dl
Vol-~C-,.,"(CIMicy, ~ ... od•)
Removed r,_
. 0
·-....., . 0 , .. ,, O
7f 10-¥7 ,1,g-3 11.11 -<.o
~ ~ 1'1 ✓-7~ ''7. 'J -;, '7
Irv> fl,, 79 . ~,:,y 17-"< <7
.
•
.
--.
Date:
Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I
I
I
:I
I
I
Site: ('(;X,
Purge
Wdl l'iiri:in,: lfrcnrtl
FCX
Statesville, North C.irolina
Well ID: . ~ ,nw -t,,S
/4 tnpc h flt i
/3:os:-Water Level Indicator:
pH/femperature Meler:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter: 2...
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time Water
Level
. .
\')I ~JD'\..
Form reviewed by:
VoSm, ~Comm~«(CIMO,, ,o>o, oao)
Removed
0
.-,;. , 1 ,,.D I J. vr t'J oq • 1 , I/. n
I. n ( ,. '.r /).I() l1-'l r./0.IJ
7,D I ,, [.~ n.n!? ,-, ·'! 1m.o
2.. y I• C/1) n. n;::; /7.</ /[1).fJ
-
Date:
Page 1
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Purge
Wcll l'uq:in,: Rcconl
FCX
Sl:1lcsvillc, North Carolina.
Site: H)'/...
Well JD: ---'-., .. nt{):.:_' -_ .,,~,~--
Water Level Indicator:
pHffemperature Meier:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
. ,
• ·---~ /~ I
-
form reviewed by:
5'7 . 3 n,'" UL -f_. 'L l/o.zc 1;,vv·,1 w
Water Volume pH Cond Temp Comments(Clarity, color, odor)
Level Removed
0
~ I •• o., ' 'D • ..... ' """ .~ ll.t .. I If.. ' . .. ='•O j ·-~ ~
••·O . -.,. /r.h· •~ ...
-
Date:
Page 1
.
, ..
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Purge
Fd {loJ>siilt /,/ L , .,
Well Purging Record
Site: _.!..H.!::{J;c:__ __ _
Well ID: . 07/AJ · '6
Water Level Indicator:
pH/fempcrature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time . -7t) I' l',n_i"f ~,
·-
Fonn reviewed by:
Water
Level
, "1 L_ I
Voh,mo ~"""""""'""•"loc. OOoc)
Removed . . . .
0
. ,0., , IJ,'f .
I.., "'·"''' .. o'1Y /7. s 21/,/)
'},O ., .... "\ .o·)J n. f. 'J/,;,, 0
.t;, D ::>,~o .oi t/ 17. ~ ?O'f,OJ
.
-
Date:
Page 1
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sile:
Well ID: mw-q
Waler Level Indicator:·
pHffemperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to waler:
Water column:
Date Time
rmzz.. ,~ \.. ,
-
Form reviewed by:
,., 1/
{..
Water
Level
Purge
Well l'urgini: lkcord·
FCX
St:itcsvillc, North C:irolin:i
Volume ~Comments(Clarity, color, odor)
Removed
0
Pv.117,1111l,11,h
()
-
Date:
Page 1
I
I
R
I
I
B
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sile:
Well ID: /1/C 1tJ
Water Lcvd Indicator:
pH/femperalurc Meter:
Conduclivity Meler:
Borehole diameter:
Tola) depth of well:
Depth lo water:
Water column:
Date Time .
/.tJ/_,qf// ,
'
Form reviewed by:
Waler
Level
Purge
Well !'urging Record
FCX
Stalcsvillc, North Carolina
Volume ~Commenls(Clarity, color, odor)
Removed
0
.
..
-
Date:
Page 1
.
R
B
I
D
B
I
I
D
Q
D
I
I
D
B
D
D
8
I
Site:
Well ID:
Water Level Indicator:
pHffemperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
• .
\0 1')'>16 L
•
.
-
Fonn reviewed by:
,fl. 1/
.2:2' 21'
L'
Water
Level
Purge
Wdl Purging Record
FC\'.
Slalcs\'illc, North C.irolina
Volume ~Comments(Clarity, color, odor)
Removed
0
-
Date:
Page 1
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
' ••
I ..
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
Sile: i
Purge
Well I' . · urgmg lfrrnnl
FCX
Statesville N . ' orlh Carolina
Well ID: ffll,; .
Water Level Ind· -a -:3-r---
pH/fe 1ca1or: .
'
mperalure M .
Conducti . eter: v,ty Meter:
Borehole d"
T
iameter
otal de th · De th P of well:
P to water·
Water column,"
I Date
-
Time
•
fonn re . viewed by:
T Water
Level
-
fvolume
Removed
0
-
pH Cond Temp
Date: -
Page 1
Comments(Clarity I ' co or, odor)
-
-
-
-
I
I.
I.
I
1·
I
' I
I
I
I
I • ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Fil'II Site: (, \
Well ID: /YI!.\} -J.U~
Water Level Indicator:
pH/femperature Mc:ter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
. \
l9rY.;AO').
-
Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
. '7
Purge
Well Purging lt,·rnnl
FCX
Stalcs,•illc, North Carolina
Volume ~C.,,moo,(CIM;cy,oo(&,.,,,)
Removed
0
l;/4-bo/ j..J, .5 .
\0 b :t\O ,;)lo ) h."\ '),t, C-,
j7 ? ,t\3. ,) l C\ ·1b/\ \7, '-\
j!;J ,.I\S -tl?. )1,0.. 17,0
lJ_!7 ~.~"l .:}\ °' )1,0 ,,.'-\
.
.
..
·•
.. -
Date:
Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
Purge
Wdl Puri:ini: nccortl
FCX
Slalcsvillc, North Carolina
Sile: _ _,__fe'"'-'-x_"-----
Wcll lO: fn()j, 7 $°:<
Water Lcv~I Indicator:
pH/femperalure Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
I . I
1/.;"~:tOl
,I
-
Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
vo,,m, ~co-o,<c,.;,, ~,~. 000,)
Removed
0 .
;,..-.f,·11 • (}/ I~ • 1 I 30 .
I. D • .1 r.r 1n.o• ~ ( r.1-I'«:>
t,.o 1 • t , .o• 14-i ' l)
~I) 4 .c. 'tl O../)q /C ~.n ,, 7l
-
Date:
Page 1
.
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
Sile: F~ ~-:','-,,....,.--,-,---
Well ID: m to ~ 11s
Water Level Indicator:
plVremperature Meler: ·
Purge
rd {IOJPS'v,!lt I,/ C
/ ~
Well Purging Record ms
lfl'SD
-----------f:/b~ ~tf._,
~ ·. l\{), ~ '5 -3D. 'tS-= q .(p ;<, l 1 ~ / . t, X 3 -;. Y •i
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameler:
Total depth of well:
Depth to waler:
Water column:
Dale Time Water Volume pH Cond Temp Comments(Clarity, color, odor)
Level Removed
' . 0
7c/':$ii ,u "-n -. ,Z-,. I • I (), I I Ill
7. "" "'""' .. 0 · n.1 ,r J I I'?. I LZ
~ • C) ,:::: • ·D ']J ~.., ,-, ti
' .. l "· 'I( ' ',I. l FJ I -, ..,.., /7 .
Form reviewed by: Date:
Page 1
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
I
R
I
Site:
Well ID:
Water Level Indicator:
pHrremperature Meter:
Conductivity Met<r:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
.
lo/,1/pJ. . .
fonn reviewed by:
4 Z11
Ivor
j,,30
Water
Level
Purge
Well l'ur,:in,: Record
FCX I
Sl:tfcsvillc, North C:trolin:1 zq ; ., ·: 00
l)JpZ-11: ,~
vo,,m, ~c-,,c,.,,, '"'"· ... ,
Removed
0
t",. ,c.li,1 V 1,? WO Z, : /.K). l ,~ ,-,,4 r),11:) t 7. ,J 'Zn.~
~D (,1.1:,l. (J. I l -7, I ,1.0.
f L"" l,.3 n. IL 1lP,'1 /Ip • II,,
~
--
Date:
Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
Dale Time
}<¥1Jl,-; 1<:o::,
'·iliih~ LITOD
1"{»,];,?... /f1f<' 1,: ~b1-;;::Jo
. 141;50 •
7
Fonn reviewed by:
Waler
Level
("( .
/. u
~
~
Purge
Well l'ur~in~ l{.-cord
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
Volume ~Comments(Clarity, color, odor)
Removed
0 .
~ ,r. 7 ..¢1~· iqJ /,.,
7 -/7 ✓4' .Jtil't. ?, ~ ''"
~ . • /i'J~ '-✓ ✓ I~ ·-I • -, --,., . ~ ,.P. ,. ~. ~-.. ~ I L.' u V,' ~
w
··-·-
· Dale:
Page 1
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
1
I
I
I
I
n
I
APPENDIXD
TRAFFIC REPORTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
NORIC:'Myfiles\My Documents\f>roiects'200)4-133 F C X\Option Year 11£193() Report Project Perl\3rd Seml--Arroal Sampling Evert Repa1\C)d2002 • 3rd semi-a-nial rpl.doc
~ &EPA USEPA Contra
Generic Chain
DaaShl-: 10/23/2002
Carrier Name: FedEx
Alrblll: delivery
Shipped to: Prism
O·
IR-a ,e,,t. 11./.6t;m ,;,,/,_, f-011'
SAMPLE No.
FCX-elfluent
MATRIX/
SAIIPlBI
Ground Water/
JOEL SHAFFER
CONC/
TYPE
UG
--boratory Program _ -stody
Chain of Custody Record
Rellnqullhed By
1 d,,/) JJ -'--
2?
3
4
ANALYSISI-
TURNARCl/ND
Pest 2 (14), VOA-2
(1jgUl>
(Dea/Time)
10/2,<.1l .. (OCVJ
'
TAQNoJ
PRESERYA TM/ B-•
239 (Not preserved). 240
(Not preserved), 241 (Not
preserved), 242 (Not
preserved), 243 (Not
preserved) (S)
- --- --Reference Casa 31075
Client No: L SDONo:
Sl11'4)1or -~~~ S1gi1ture: --For Lab Use Only
Recelved-t!y
-• ' -.v.
/_. -I
I
STATlON
LOCATION
,-,
-
FCX-elfluent
(Date / Time) Lab Contract No:
-;? -'_,,.-Unit Prtce:
10/ vi"" ,, 11 ,, Tranafer To:
Lab Contract No:
Unit Prtce:
SAMPLE COIJ.ECT
DA1E/T111E
S: 10/23/2002 15:30
FOR LAB USE ONLY
Simple Cond!lon On Receipt
J¢l Sk#eY
(qt~ l{wt Gj/('
ShfpmentforCase l51mple(1) to be used for laboratory QC: Addttlonal Sampler Slgnature(1): Cooler Tsmpsrauro Chain of Custody Seal Number:
Complelt?y Upon Rocolpt: 'f-. ~ °C.
Anatylll Key: Concentration: L II Low-, M .. Low/Medium, H"' High Type/Oealgnltt: Composite III C, Grab • G Custody Seal Intact? _, I Shipment Iced? _
Pest 2 = Pesticides, VOA~2 = VOA
TR Number:
PR provldn prellmlnary mutts. Requtttl for pn,llmlnary rNUlta wm lncraaH anatytlcal coetl.
Send Copy to: Sample Management Office, 2000 Edmund Halley Dr., Reston; VA. 20191-3400 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
4-415156501-102302-0004 LABORATORY COPY·
F2va.1. 043 Page 1 of 1
iiiil
!l!l!!!I =; ----.. lilil• lilil --• &EPA USEPA Contract Labora~ ~ENT CONTROL NUMB~D AL-"Z"-1 R Case No: 31075 Organic Traffic Report & 0,aln of Custody Record ' DAS No:
Region: 4 Daw 8hlpped:t.:~11!511!88S 10/z_;/o ii: thaln of CUlltody Record .... ~ Project Codo: 03-0090
__ ,
FedEx IIIJIIIIIII:
-nt~: Alrbllt 835682183240 Rollnqulohed By (Data/Time) RIOllvldBy (Daw/ Time) Cl!RCUS ID:
Shipped to: Shealy Environmental 1~~~../_/ ,.1-,,J,,, 11:00 If')~ iokd., t 7•'at Spill ID: .,
106 Vantage Point Drive 2~ ' lltoNamo/Sllta: FCX/Stateavllle/NC Ceyce SC 29033
Project Leader: JOEL SHAFFER [phone]
3 Action:
Sampling Co: Weaton Solutlona 4
OROANIC MATRIX/ CCNC/ AN.It.VIia/ TAQNoJ STATION IIAIIPL! COLLECT lNOROANlC QC SAMPLE No, IIAIIPL!R TYPE TUIICAROUND PRES BIVA TM;/ 8011111 LOCATION DAl!/TlME SAMPLE No. 1')l>I
D1KS8 Ground Water/ LJG Peat Only (14) 101, 102 (2) FCX-MW-4 S: 10/22/2002 14:20 Joa
SHAFFER
D1KS7 Ground Water/ · L/G Pest Only (14) 103, 104 (2) FCX-MW-3 s: 10/22/2002 14:45 l · JOEL
SHAFFER
D1KS8 Ground Water/ L/G BNA (14), PEST (14), 105,106,108,109,110 FCX-MW-8 s: 10123/2002 9:35 MD1KS8 JOEL VOA(14) (HCL), 111 (HCL), 112 SHAFFER (HCL) (7) D1KS9 Ground Water L/G BNA (14), PEST (14), 114, 11~ 111117, 118 FCX-OUP 1 S: 10/23/2002 9:45 MD1KS9 Field Duplicate VOA (14) (HCL), 119 (HCL), 120
(HCL) (7)
NbJ~ro D1KT0 Ground Water/ L/G BNA (14), PEST (14), 121 (HCL), 122 (HCL), 123 FCX-MW-27a S: 10/23/2002 9:10 JOEL VOA (14) (HCL), 127, 128, 129, 130 SHAFFER (7) D1KT1 Ground Water/ L/G BNA (14), PEST (14), 132 (HCL), 133 (HCL), 134 FCX-MW-8a s: 10/2312002 10:25 MD1KT1 JOEL VOA (14) (HCL), 135, 136, 137, 138 SHAFFER . (7) D1KT2 Ground Water/ L/G BNA (14), PEST (14), 139, 140, 141, 142, 143 FCX•MW•Sd s: 10/23/2002 10:30 MD1KT2 JOEL VOA (14) (HCL), 144 (HCL), 145 SHAFFER (HCL) (7) D1KT3 Ground Water/ L/G BNA (14), PEST (14), 147 (HCL), 148 (HCL), 149 FCX-w-291 s: 10/2312002 ·11:00 MD1KT3 JOEL VOA (14) (HCL), 150, 151, 152, 153 SHAFFER (7) .
D1KT4 Ground Water L/G BNA (14), PEST (14), 155 (HCL1; 156 (HCL), 157 FCX-OUP2 S: 10/2312002 9:45 MD1KT4 Field Duplicate VOA(14) (HCL), 159, 160, 161, 162
(7) • D1KT5 Ground Water/ L/G BNA (14), PEST (14), 164, 165, 166, 167, 168 FCX-MW-6d s: 1012312002 13:15 MD1KT5 JOEL VOA (14) (HCL), 169 (HCL), 170 SHAFFER (HCL) (7)
Shlpmw,t for C••
Compllll? N
S1mplo(I) to bl uNd for labomory QC: AddtUonal Sampler Slgnature(1): Chain of Cuatody Seal Number.
Analyoll Koy: Concentrltlon: L • Lc7N, M • Low/Medium, H • High Type!Dulgnate: Compoalte a C, Grab IZ G Shipment h..K? BNA • CLP TCL Semlvo atue&, r ..... I c: --· I ..... r .. SL!~oe ......... a, rtBl vn1y a ...... r ,.-esuc1oes vn1y, vvn a .., .. , , .., .. v01a ..... s
TR Number: 4-415156501-102302-0003
~R providN preUmlnary mutts. Requestt tor pn,hmtnary reaultl will lncte1N ana!ytlcal co1t1. Send Copy to: Sample Management Office, 2000 Edmund Halley Dr., Roston, VA. 20191-3400 Phone [phone] Fax [phone] ·
REGION COPY
F2\/'1.0oC3 Page 1 of 2 ·
--·-... -lliil -----.. 111111 .. -iiill &EPA ·USEPA Contract LaboratoryProiQGWMENT CONTROL NUMISl~...;f.~~:Hf.:';;;-~--;;;;---r
Organic Traffic Report & Clair, of Custody Record
ae No: 31075 R DAS No:
Region:
Project Code:
Account Code:
CERCUSID:
Spill ID:
4
03-0090
Sitt Name/Stitt: FCX/Statesvllle/NC
JOEL SHAFFER Project Leldtr:
Action:
Sempllng Co: Weston SoluUons
ORGANIC MATRJXI CCNC/ ANALYSIS/
•SAMPLE No. BAMP'.EII TYPE TURNAROUND
D1KT6 Ground Water/ LJG BNA (14), PEST (14),
JOEL
SHAFFER
VOA(1,4)
D1KT7 Ground Water/ LJG BNA (14), PEST (14),
JOEL VOA(14)
SHAFFER
D1KT8 Ground Water IG VOA(14)
Shlpmerrt fot C••
Complolt?N
Samplo(o) to be uud for laboratory QC:
Dato Bhlppod:
CffllerName:
Alrt>III: 835882183240
Shipped to: Shealy Environmental
1oe Vantage Point Drive
Cayce SC 29033
[phone]
TAONoJ STATlON
PRl!SERYATM/ Botto, LOCATlON
187,188,189,190,192 FCX-w-25s
(HCL), 193 (HCL), 194
(HCL) (7)
172,173,174,175,176 FCX-MW-61
(HCL), 177 (HCL), 178
(HCL) (7)
195 (HCL), 196 (HCL), 197 FCX-Tl!-01
(HCL) (3)
Additional Sampler Slgnature(t):
aln of Custody Record
3
4
IIAMPLI! CX>LL!CT
DAlE/TlM!
S: 10/23/2002 14:00
S: 10/23/2002 13:05
S: 10/23/2002 17:00
Anelyolo Key: Concentration: L II Low, M • LowiMedlum, H • High Type/Oealgnatlt: COmj)Olite • C, Grab• G
BNA II CLP TCL Semlvo;aLt8S, r~'"'-' = ........ .-lwL. r'eauciae,r-wga,·t'est uniy-= vi..r l""esuciaes un1y, vv,.. = .... 1.., 11,,,i.. vo1a~1es
TR Number: 4-415156501-102302-0003
PR provldu prellmlnary mutts. Retquntl for prellmlnary mutts wm lncreaH anatydcal co1t1.
Send Copy to: Sample Management Office, 2000 Edmund Halley Dr., Reston, VA. 20191-3400 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
Barq>ltr ~ Blplunl
(Dato I limo)
16°'~
INORGANIC QC
SAMPLE No. Typo
MD1KT6
MD1KT7
Chain of Cuotody Sul Number.
Shipment l:od?
. REGION CQfl't'
F2YU0.i Pago 2 of 2
iiii1
.. -------ail -iiiiJ -liiil --.. iiliil .. -.· :&"EPA USEPA Contract Laboratory Pl 1!DWIM6Nl w~ 111u1-Av ......... vJ ~3'} ·3t>
R aae No: 31075 Inorganic Traffic Report & Chain of Custody Record /.Jra'I-DAS No:
Region: 4 Dato Shipped: ,t11i!511!88£ to/~/o c:_ aln of Custody Record Sa•r ProJICI Code: B11111turo: 03-0090 Carrier Name: FedEx Account Code: Alrl>III: 835662183250 (Dato /Time) CERCUSID:
Shipped to: Liberty Ana/ytlcal ~ Bplll ID: 0 CorporaUon Site Name/State: FCX/Statesvllle/NC 501 Madison Avenuo ProJICI loadtr: JOEL SHAFFER Csry NC 27513
[phone] 3 Action:
Bampllng Co: Weston Solutlons 4
INORGANIC IIAlRJX/ CONC/ ANALYBIS.' TAONoJ STATION IIAIIPU! COLI.fer ORGANIC QC 'SAMPLE No, IIAIIPLER nPe 'llfflNAROUND PRl!B ERVA T1VE/ Bo111t1 LOCAT1011 DA'leJTllle SAMPLE No. T)l)t
MD1KS5 Ground Water/ L/G TM(14) 100 (HNO3) (1) BS-011-TBW S: 10/1712002 16:00 · Trlp_Blank JOEL
SHAFFER
MD1KS8 Ground Water/ L/G TM(14) 107 (HNO3) (1) FCX-MW--' S: 10/23/2002 9:35 D1KS8 JOEL
SHAFFER
MD1KS9 Ground Water L/G TM(14) 113 (HNO3)(1) FCX-DUP 1 . S: 10/23/2002 9:45 D1KS9 Field Duplicate
MD1KT1 Ground Water/ L/G lM(14) 131 (HNO3) (1) FCX-MW-51 S: 10/2312002 10:25 D1KT1 JOEL
SHAFFER
MD1KT2 Ground Water/ L/G lM(14) 148 (HN03) (1) FCX-MW-5d S: 10/23/2002 10:30 D1KT2 JOEL
SHAFFER
MD1KT3 Ground Water/ L/G lM(14) 1154 (HN03) (1) FCX-291 S: 10/2312002 11:00 D1KT3 JOEL
SHAFFER
MD1KT4 Ground Water L/G TM(14) 158 (HNO3) (1) FCX-DUP2 s: 10/23/2002 9:45 D1KT4 Flold Duplicate
MD1KT5 Ground Water/ L/G Th1(14) 183 (HNO3) (1) FCX-MW--'d S: 10/23/2002 13:15 D1KT5 JOEL
SHAFFER
MD1KT8 Ground Water/ L/G Th1(14) 191 (HNO3) (1) FCX-25& S: 10/23/2002 14:00 D1KT8 JOEL
SHAFFER
MD1KT7 Ground Water/ L/G TM(14) 171 (HNO3) (1) FCX-MW--'a S: 10/2312002 13:05 D1KT7 JOEL
SHAFFER
Shipment fo, C•• Sample(t) to bt Ultd for iaborato,y QC: Addmonal Sampler Signature(■): Chain of Cuatody 8eol Numbtr. Compltlt?N
An1ly1l1 Key: concentradon: L • Lo.v, M a LOwlMedlum, H ■ High Typt/Dnlgn1te: Compaalte • C, Grab • G Shipment Iced? TM. CLP TAL Total Me~,s
TR Number: 4-415156501-102302-0002
PR provkfH prwllmlnary rMutta. R"1UNta tor prellmtnary rnulta wtU lncrNH 1natyt1cal coats. Sond Copy to: Samph! Management Office, 2000 Edmund Halley Dr., Reaton, VA 20191-3400 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
REGION COPY
F211l1.0'3 Page 1 of 1
llllil iiillil iliil ~ ---iiiil .. iilll . -liiil -ilil --·oEPA USEPA Contract Laboratory ~fmcMT C0."'41 KOL MIMD . -{j't.'l'Jt!1'k:-Gha-lr;n1-Joo:ff-GtGuitststco~dty-, J.i,, i.~~-Reference Case: 31075
--+-client No: R Region:
Project Code:
Account Code:
CERCUSID:
Spill ID:
Site Homo/State:
ProJoct Leeder:
Action:
SempllngCo:
'SAMPLE No.
4
03-0090
FCX/Stataavllle/NC
JOEL SHAFFER
Weston Solutions
IIAlRJX/ CONCI
8AIIPLEII TYPE
ANM.YSJI/ TUl\twlouND
Datt Shipped:
C1"11rNam1:
Alrt>III:
Shipped to:
FedEx
835682183250
Uberty Analytlcal
Corporauon
501 Madison Avenue
Caiy NC 27513
[phone]
TAONoJ STA.TION PRESl!RVA T1'IEI B0Ule1 LOCATION
Chalh of Custody ReQ>nl
3
4
8AIIU COJJ.ECT
DA'Jl!/llME
MD1KTO Ground Water/ L/G TM-2 (14) 124 (HNO3), 125 (HNO3), FCX-#.W-27& S: 10/23/2002 9:10 JOEL
SHAFFER 126 (HNO3) (3)
.I
.
Shipment for C•• Samplo(1) to be uaed for laboratory QC: AdclltJonal Sampler Slgnature(1): C01!1)111t?Y
MD1KTO
Anaf)'lla K.y: Concentration: L c Low, M • LowiMedlum, H • High Type/Oealgnate: ComPotlte • C, Grab 11: G TM•2 • CLP Total Metal
R Number: -

-
4-415156501 102302 0001 PR provtdn prellmlnary mufti. RequHt:a for preliminary 1'91Urta wm lnc:reu, 1n1JytlC1I cottt, Send Copy to: Sample Management Office, 20C0 Edmund Halley Dr., Roston, VA. 20191-3400 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
'f e-<>'"gt\'.-QC
Typa
I::>\ '\(TO
Chaln of Cu.tody Seal Number.
Shipment Iced?
REGION COPY
F2Vl1,o,u Page 1 of 1
iiiil
· ·&tR4 J.!SEPA Contract Laboratory Prog,;ar~uc-NT CONTROL NUM8ER~1-;"3.-3D -se No: 31075 R • Organic Traffic Report & a, all'! of Custody Record A.1..:z '/ DAS No: -Region: 4 Dm811!1>pod: 10/23/2002 Chain of Custody Record Ban-,»:~ Project Code: 03-0090 Cantor Name: FedEx S11111tu '4,,__
Account Code: AlrtJII~ 836412900973 R■Unqullhed By (Date/ Time) Recetv.a By (Dato/ Time) CERCLISID:
Shipped to: Shealy Environmental 1//4/R' A' -l,u!. l/).q'.) l<d& ,/ ,/ (o;"~, Spill ID: ~ 108 Vantage Point Drive z ., Site Name/Stat.I: FCX/Stateavllle/NC Cayc:eSC29033
Project Leader: JOEL SHAFFER [phone]
3 Action:
SampllngCO: Weaton Solutions 4
ORGANIC IIATROO CONC/ ANALYIIII TAGNoJ STATION SAMPLE COLJ.Ecr INORGANIC QC llAMPLENo. SAJIPLSI TIPE TUIIW\ClUHD PRESERVATM/ Bollltt. LOCATION DAlE/IUlc SAMPLE No. fypt
D1KT9 Ground Water/ LJG Peat Only (14), VOA 196, 199, 200 (HCL), 201 FCX-lnfluent S: 1012312002 15:30 ·-JOEL (14) (HCL), 202 (HCL) (5)
D1KWO
SHAFFER
Field QC/ L/G VOA (14) 204 (HCL), 205 (HCL), 208 FCX-PB-102302 S: 10/2312002 14:50 MD1KWO JOEL (HCL) (3) I SHAFFER
01KW1 Field QC/ L/G BNA (14), PEST (14), 208,209,210 (HCL), 211 FCX-EB S: 1012312002 14:45 M01KW1 JOEL VOA (14) (HCL), 212 (HCL), 213,214 SHAFFER (7) D1KW2 Field QC/ LJG BNA (14), PEST (14), 216,217,216 (HCL), 219 FCX-OFB S: 10/2312002 · 14:20 MD1KW2 JOEL VOA (14) (HCL), 220 (HCL), 221,222 SHAFFER (7) D1KW3 Ground Water/ lJG BNA (14), PEST (14), 223 (HCL), 224 (HCL), 225 FCX-w-24a S: 1012312002 11:30 MD1KW3 JOEL VOA (14) (HCL), 227, 228, 229, 230 SHAFFER (7) D1KW4 Ground Watar/ lJG BNA (14), PEST (14), 232,233,234,235,238 FCX-MW-7 S: 10/2312002 . 15:15 MD1KW4 JOEL VOA (14) (HCL), 237 (HCL), 238 SHAFFER (HCL) (7)
lab QC 'Tif/P D1KW5 Ground Water/ lJG VOA (14) 244 (HCL), 245 (HCL), 246 FCX•TB--02 S: 10123/2002 17:00 JOEL (HCL) (3) SHAFFER
Shlpmsrt for ca, llampla(a) to bt uaod lor laborato,y QC: Adcllllonol SOmplor Sl9nlllll'l(1): Chain of Custody &uJ Number. Con1)1oll?Y
D1KW5
AnaJyal1 Key: Concentration: L • Low, M • Low/Medium, H • H)Qh Type/l)Nlgntto: Compoalte • C, Grab o G Shipment le.Kt? BNA • CLP TCL Semivo au,ea, ri;. .... 1 • v1.r , ........... ~"'""'e,n .. 11o11I, t"'llt uniy • ..,...,. t"'8S1.1 ....... e1 ..,,,11y, .,..,,,,.. • Yl.r I vi.. vo1au1es
R Number: ' -4-415156501 102302-0006 PR provldN p,.llmlnary rHUlta, Rtq41nll lor prollmlnary rNUlta wlll I,,_ analytical COIII, REGION COPY
Send Copy to: Sample Management Office, 20\P Edmund Halley Or., Raaton, VA. 20191-3400 Phone [phone] Fax [phone] FlVU-0'3 Pago 1 of 1
liliil .. -.. ilill .. ------·&EPA _U~EPA Contract Laboratory Prog/allti •-r.111 W 1111".,.. ""' ....... _&:;.:::.:::.c.::.:,k;;-e:N-0:-----::3-:-10=1::s------;:R::,
Inorganic Traffic Report & Cha~n of Custody Record oAs No:
!logion:
Project Code:
Account~,
CERCUSID:
8plll1D:
Sita Name/Stat,:
Project IMdor:
Action:
Sampling CO:
INORGANIC
SAMPLE No.
4
03-0090
F.CX/Stateavllle/NC
JOEL SHAFFER
Weston ·solutlona
IIA'IRIX/ COHC/
SAIIPI.ER TiPE
ANALYSIS/
TUltlAROUND
Data8hlppld:
CtnlorNamo:
Alrt,m:
8hlppodto:
1012312002
FedEx
836412900951 ·
Liberty Analytlcal
CorporaUon
601 Madlaon Avenue
Cary NC 27513
[phone]
TAGNoJ STATION
PREIERVATMI Bolltl LOCATION
Cha'n of Custody Record
3
4
IAIIPLE COLLl:CT
DAlE/TIIIE
MD1KWO Field QC/ IJG Th1(14) 203 (HN03) (1) FCX.PB-102302 S: 10/23/2002 14:50
JOEL
SHAFFER
MD1KW1 Field QC/ IJG Th1(14) 207 (HN03) (1) FCX-EB S: 10/23/2002 14:45
JOEL
SHAFFER
MD1KW2 Field QC/ IJG Th1(14) 215 (HN03) (1) FCX-OFB S: 10/23/2002 14:20
JOEL
SHAFFER
M01KW3 Ground Watar/ IJG Th1 (14) 226 (HN03) (1) FCX-w-24a S: 10/2312002 11:30
JOEL
SHAFFER
MD1KW4 Ground Water/ IJG Th1(14) 231 (HN03)(1) FCX-MW-7 S: 1012312002 15:15
JOEL
SHAFFER
Sh~mtnlfOfCDt
Comploio?Y
Samplo(a) to bo UHCl lor laboratoty QC: Additional Sampler Slgnaturo(a):
I Analyola Koy: Concenlrltlon: L • Low, M • Lcw/Mecllum. H • High .'Type/l)fflgnato: Compoalte • C, Grab ■ G
'Th1 • CLP TAL Total Me 811
rR Number: 4-415156501-102302-0005
'R pnwldN preliminary rHultl. Requee1a for preliminary -ultl will lncruae 111111ytloal coat,.
lend Copy to: Sample Management Office, 2000 Edmund Halley Dr., Raaton, VA. 20191-3400 Phone [phone] Fax [phone] . . .
Sa•r
Sl(llltul>!
ORGANIC
SAMPLE No.
D1KWO
D1KW1
D1KW2
D1KW3
D1KW4
(Dato I Time)
QC Type .
7'/7~e. I,{.
-Ep,rSlc..,k.
Chain of Cultody Seal Number:
ShJpment iced?
-. ,. ,. REGION COP'f
F2\1'1MI Page 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXE
LABO RA TORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
NOR/C:\MyFilos\My Documents\Pro;ads\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1VJ930 Ropat Pm;ed Per1\3rd ~ SBmptir,g Event Repa1\()c::Q002. 3rd serri-arnua! rpt_doc
I' ,.lab Report ~--x·~~ I
FuD Service Ana1y11ca1 & Em,ironmental Solutions
I 11/11/02 Page 1 of4
Roy F. Weston, Inc Customer Project ID: FCX
I Attn: Joe Ferentz Customer Sample ID: FCX-EFFLUENT
5430 Metric Place, Suite 100 Prism Samole ID: AC62041
Norcross, GA 30092 LO!lin Group: 3799K1
I Sample Collection Date/Time: 10/23/02 15:30
Lab Submittal Date/Time: 10/24/02 11:10
I
The following analytical results have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST TEST REPORTING METHOD DATE/TIME
PARAMETER RESULT UNITS LIMIT REFERENCE STARTED ANALYST
I PREP. METHOD 3510 FOR PESTICIDES Completed SW846-3510C 10/27/02 08:30 SM
ALDRIN Not detected ug/l 0.05 SW846-8081A 10/29102 07: 10 LAC
I A-BHC Not detected ug/l 0.05 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
B-BHC Not detected ug/l 0.05 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
D-BHC Not detected ug/l 0.05 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
I G-BHC Not detected ug/l 0.05 SW846-8081A 10/29102 07:10 LAC
CHLORDANE Not detected ug/l 0.05 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
4,4'-0DD Not detected ug/l 0.1 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
I 4,4'-0DE Not detected ug/l 0.1 SW846-8081A 10/29102 07:10 LAC
4,4'-0DT Not detected ug/l 0.1 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
I DIELDRIN Not detected ug/l 0.1 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
ENDOSULFAN I Not detected ug/l 0.05 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
ENDOSULFAN 11 Not detected ug/l 0.1 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
I ENDOSULFAN SULFATE Not detected ug/l 0.1 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
ENDRIN Not detected ug/l 0.1 SW846-8081A ·10/29/02 07:10 LAC
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE Not detected ug/l 0.1 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
I HEPTACHLOR Not detected ug/l 0.05 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
HEPTACHLOR EPOXJDE Not detected ug/l 0.05 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
I 4,4'-METHOXYCHLOR Not detected ug/l 0.1 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
TOXAPHENE Not detected ug/l 5.0 SW846-8081A 10/29/02 07:10 LAC
I BENZENE Not detected ug/l 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/0217:10 KC
BROMOBENZENE Not detected ug/l 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE Not detected ug/l 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
I BROMODICHLOROMETHANE Not ch;tected ug/l 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
.BROMOFORM Not detected ug/l 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/0217:10 KC
BROMOMETHANE Not detected ug/l 10 SW846-8260B 11/5/0217:10 KC -I N-BUTYLBENZENE Not detected ug/l 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/0217:10 KC
SEC-BUTYLBENZENE Not detected ug/l 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/0217:10 KC
I TERT-BUTYLBENZENE Not detected ug/l 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/0217:10 KC
NC Certification No. 402 -SC Certification No. 99012 -NC Drinking Water Cert. No. 37735 -FL Certification No. E87519
I 449 Springbrook Road A P.O. Box 240543 A Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: 704 / 529-6364 A Toll Free Number: 1-800 / 529-6364 A Fax: 704 / 525-0409
I Lab Report i~~l.! I
FUS Service Analytic:al & Envlronmenlal Solutions
I 11/11/02 Page2 of4
Roy F. Weston, Inc . Customer Project ID: FCX
I Attn: Joe Ferentz Customer Sample ID: FCX-EFFLUENT
5430 Metric Place, Suite 100 Prism Samole ID: AC62041
Norcross, GA 30092 LO!lin Group: 3799K1
I Sample Collection Date/Time: 10/23/02 15:30
Lab Submittal Date/Time: 10/24/02 11:10
I
The following analytical results have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST TEST REPORTING METHOD DATE/TIME
PARAMETER RESULT UNITS LIMIT REFERENCE STARTED ANALYST
I CHLOROBENZENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
CHLOROETHANE Not detected ug/1. 10 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I CHLOROFORM Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
CHLOROMETHANE Nol detected ug/L 10 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I 2-CHLOROTOLUENE Not detected ug/L 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
4-CHLOROTOLUENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/510217:10 KC
1.2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE Not detected ug/L 10 SW846-8260B 11/510217:10 KC
I 1.2-DIBROMOETHANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/510217:10 KC
DIBROMOMETHANE Not detected ug/L 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
1.2-DICHLOROBENZENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I 1,3-0ICHLOROBENZENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE Not detected ug/L 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE Not detected ug/1. 10 SW846-8260B 11/510217:10 KC
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
lRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
I 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
1,3-0ICHLOROPROPANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
I 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
1, 1-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/0217:10 KC
ETHYLBENZENE Not detected ug/L 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
ISOPROPYLBENZENE Not detected ug/L 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
P-ISOPROPYL TOLUENE Not detected ug/L 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I METHYLENE CHLORIDE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/510217:10 KC
NAPHTHALENE Not detected ug/L 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
I N-PROPYLBENZENE Not detected ug/L 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/510217:10 KC
STYRENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/510217:10 KC
NC Certilii:ation N!). 402 -SC Certification No. 99012 -NC Drinking Water Cert. No. 37735 -FL Certification No. E87519
I 449 Springbrook Road 4 P.O. Box 240543 4 Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: 704 / 529-6364 4 Toll Free Number: 1-800 / 529-6364 4 Fax: 704 / 525-0409
I Lab Report i~~ I
FuD Servk::eAnalytical & Effll1u111,e,1tal Solutions
I 11/11/02 Page 3 of 4
Roy F. Weston, Inc Customer Project ID: FCX
I Attn: Joe Ferentz Customer Sample ID: FCX-EFFLUENT
5430 Metric Place, Suite 100 Prism Samole ID: AC62041
Norcross, GA 30092 · Loiiin Group: 3799K1
I Sample Collection Date/Time: 10/23/02 15:30
Lab Submittal Date/Time: 10/24/02 11:10
I
The following analytical results have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST TEST REPORTING METHOD DATE/TIME
PARAMETER RESULT UNITS LIMIT REFERENCE STARTED ANALYST
I 1, 1, 1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
TETRACHLOROETHENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC I TOLUENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/510217:10 KC
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW646-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I 1.2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/510217:10 KC
1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW646-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I TRICHLOROETHENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE Not detected ug/1. 10 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
1.2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 1115102 17:10 KC
I 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I VINYL CHLO~IDE Not detected ug/1. 10 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
TOTAL XYLENES Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW646-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC.
cls-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW646-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
I lrans-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
ACETONE Not detected ug/1. 50 SW646-8260B 1115102 17:10 KC
2-BUT ANONE (MEI<) Not detected ug/1. 10 SW846-8260B 1115/02 17:10 KC I CARBON DISULFIDE Not detected ug/1. 50 SW646-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
I 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYLETHER Not detected ug/1. 10 SW646-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
2-HEXANONE Not detected ug/1. 10 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE (MIBK) Not detected ug/1. 10 SW646-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
I MTBE Not detected ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5/02 17:10 KC
IPE Not detected · ug/1. 5.0 SW846-8260B 11/5102 17:10 KC
I
I
NC Certification No. 402 • SC Certification No. 99012 -NC Drinking Water Cert. No. 37735 -FL Certification No. E87519
I 449 Springbrook Road "' P.O. Box 240543 .._ Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: 704 / 529-6364 .,. Toll Free Number. 1-800 / 529-6364 .,. Fax: 704 / 525-0409
----···--
I Lab Report ,a~~~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11/11/02
Roy F. Weston, Inc
Attn: Joe Ferentz
5430 Metric Place, Suite 100
Norcross, GA 30092
Fut SeMceAnatytkal & Ern1io.1161ta1 SohJlkJns
Page4 of 4
Customer Project ID: FCX
Customer Sample ID: FCX-EFFLUENT
Prism Sample ID: AC62041
Looin Group: 3799K1
Sample Collection Datetnme: 10/23/02 15:30
Lab Submittal Datetnme: 10/24/02 11 :1 O
The following analytical results have been obtained for the indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
TEST
PARAMETER
Sample Comments:
TEST
RESULT
REPORTING METHOD DATE/TIME
UNITS LIMIT REFERENCE STARTED ANALYST
Analysis note forSW-846/8081: Sample was extracted by EPA-608. Sample duplicate was used as the batch
QC.
Angela D. Overcash, V.P. Laboratory Services
NC Certification No. 402 -SC Certification No. 99012 -NC Drinking Water Cert. No. 37735 -FL Certification No. E87519 .
449 Springbrook Road A P.O. Box 240543 .a. Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: 704 / 529-6364 .a. Toll Free Number: 1-800 / 529-6364 A Fax: 704 / 525-0409
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMORANDUM
Date: 11/21/2002
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
nnr.UMENT CONTROi. NUMBER R5:?t33-Jft:AMFO
Subject: Results of METALS Sample Analysis
03-0090 FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Statesville, NC
From: Goddard, Denise ~
To: Mallary, Ken
CC: Joe Ferentz
RACSNJ
Thru: QA Office
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have any
questions, please contact me. ·
I ATTACHMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,
Pagel of 8
November 15, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT
Case Number:___,,3~1~0~7~5,,__ ____________ _
Project Number:-"0~3~--0=0~9~0 __________ _
Site: FCX Inc. (Statesville Plant)·, Statesville, NC
Sample No. Element Flag Reason
517 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 18% Sb UJ Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
As UJ Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 16.5% Be u Baseline instability in cal blanks Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 18. 7%
Co J Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Cu J Serial dilution percent difference 11. 8%
Fe J Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 15 .1%
Mn J Matrix spike recovery= 73 .1%
Serial dilution percent difference = 16.6%
Ni J Serial dilutio.n percent difference 18. 4%
Se R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Matrix spike recovery= 62.2%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery = 42.7%
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14. 6% ;
Zn J Serial dilution percent difference 20.9%
518 Al UJ Serial dilution percent difference = 18%
Positives in cal and prep blanks
Sb J Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
As J Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference 16.5%
Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 18. 7% Co J Serial dilution percent difference 16.6% Cu J Serial dilution percent difference 11. 8%
Fe J Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 15.1%
Mn J Matrix spike recovery= 73 .1%
Serial dilution percent difference = 16.6% Ni J Serial dilution percent difference 18.4%
Se J Matrix spike recovery = 62.2%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 42.7%
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14.6%
Zn J. Serial dilution percent difference 20. 9%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,
Page 2 of 8
November 15, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case Number: 31075
Project Number: 03-0090
Site: FCX Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
Sam2le No. Element Flag Reason
519 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 18%
Sb UJ Matrix spike recovery = 68.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
As UJ Matrix spike recovery = 71%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 16.5%
Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 18.7%
Co UJ Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Cu J Serial dilution percent difference 11. 8%
Fe J Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 15.H
Mn J Matrix spike recovery= 73.1%
Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Ni J . Serial dilution percent difference -18.4%
Se J Matrix spike recovery = 62.2%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery = 42. 7%
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14.6%
Zn J Serial dilution percent difference 20. 9% ;
520 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 18%
Sb UJ Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
As UJ Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Ba J Serial dilution percent· difference 16.5%
Be u Baseline instability in cal blanks
Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 18. 7%
Co J Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Cu J Serial dilution percent difference = 11. 8%
Fe J Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 15 .1%
Mn J Mattix spike recovery= 73 .1%
Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Ni J Serial dilution percent difference = 18 .4%
Se J Matrix spike recovery= 62 .2%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 42. 7%
V J Serial dilution percent difference = 14.6%
Zn J Serial dilution percent difference 20.9%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 3 of 8
November 15, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case Nwnber,~3~1=0~7=5 _____________ _
Project Nwnber,~0~3~--0~0~9~0 __________ _
Site, FCX Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
Sample No. Element Flag Reason
521 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 18%
Sb J Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
As UJ Matrix spike recovery= 71%-
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference 16.5%
Be u Baseline instability in cal blanks
Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 18.7%
Co UJ Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Cu J Serial dilution percent difference = 11. 8%
Fe J Serial dilution percent difference = 16.6%
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 15 .1%
Mn J Matrix spike recovery= 73 .1%
Serial dilution percent difference = 16.6%
Ni J Serial dilution percent difference = 18.4%
Se J Matrix spike recovery= 62.2%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 42.7%
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14. 6%
Zn J Serial dilution percent difference 20.9% ;
522 Al UJ Serial dilution percent difference = 18%
Positives in cal and prep blanks
Sb UJ Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
As J Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 16.5%
Cr R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Serial dilution percent difference = 18. 7%
Co J Serial dilution percent difference = 16. 6%
Cu R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Serial dilution percent difference 11. 8%
Fe J Serial dilution percent difference = 16.6%
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 15.1%
Mn J Matrix spike recovery= 73.1%
Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Ni J Serial dilution percent difference 18. 4%
Se J Matrix spike recovery = 62.2%
Tl J. Matrix spike recovery = 42.7%
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14.6%
Zn UJ Serial dilution percent difference = 20.9%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 4 of 8
November 15, 2002 INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case NUmber:~3~1~0~7~5~-------------Project Number:~0~3~-~0~0~9~0 __________ _ Site: FCX Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
Sample No. Element Flag Reason 523 Al UJ Serial dilution percent difference 18% Positives in cal and prep blanks Sb J Matrix spike recovery= 68.6% As J Matrix spike recovery= 71% Ba J Serial dilution percent difference 16.5% Cr J Serial dilution percent difference = 18. 7% Co J Serial dilution percent difference 16.6% Cu J Serial dilution percent difference 11. 8% Fe UJ Serial dilution percent.difference 16.6% Positives in cal and prep blanks Pb u Baseline instability in cal blanks Mg J Serial dilution percent difference = 15 .1% Mn J Matrix spike recovery= 73.1% Serial dilution percent difference 16.6% Ni J Serial dilution percent difference 18. 4% Se J Matrix spike recovery= 62.2% Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 42. 7% V J Serial dilution percent difference = 14 .6% Zn UJ Serial dilution percent difference 20.9% Baseline instability in cal blanks
524 Al UJ Serial dilution percent difference = 18% Positives in cal and prep blanks Sb J Matrix spike recovery= 68.6% As J Matrix spike recovery = 71% Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 16.5% Cr J Serial dilution percent difference = 18.7% Co J Serial dilution percent difference 16.6% Cu J Serial dilution percent difference = 11.8% Fe UJ Serial dilution percent difference = 16.6% Positives in cal and prep blanks Pb u Baseline instability in cal blanks Mg J Serial dilution percent difference = 15.1% Mn J Matrix spike recovery= 73 .1% Serial dilution percent difference = 16.6% Ni J Serial dilution percent difference 18.4% Se J Matrix spike recovery= 62. 2% Tl J. Matrix spike recovery= 42. 7% V J Serial dilution percent difference = 14.6% Zn UJ Serial dilution percent difference = 20.9% Baseline instability in cal blanks
I
--
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
Page 5 of 8
November 15, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case Number:--=3~1~0~7~5,,__ ____________ _
Project Number:-"0~3~-~0~0~9~0"-------------
Site: FCX Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
Sample No.
525
526
I
Element
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Ni
Se
Tl
V
Zn
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Ni
Se
Tl
V
Zn
Flag
UJ
UJ
J
J u
J
J
J
UJ
J
J
R
J
J.
J
J
J
UJ
J
J
u
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Reason
Serial dilution percent difference 18%
Positives in cal and prep blanks
Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Serial dilution percent difference 16.5%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference= 18.7%
Serial dilution percent difference= 16.6%
Serial dilution percent difference= 11.8%
Serial dilution percent difference 16'.6%
Positives in cal and prep blanks
Serial dilution percent difference 15.1%
Matrix spike recovery= 73.1%
Serial dilution percent difference= 16.6%
Analyte reported as potential false positive
Serial dilution percent difference 10·.41
Matrix spike recovery= 62.2%
Matrix spike recovery= 42.7%
Serial dilution percent difference 14.6%
Serial dilution percent difference 20.9%
Serial dilution percent difference
Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Serial dilution percent difference=
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference=
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Matrix spike recovery= 73.1%
Serial dilution percent difference=
Serial dilution percent difference
Matrix spike recovery= 62.2%
Matrix spike recovery= 42.7%
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference=
18%
16.5%
18. 7%
16.6%
11. 8%
16.6%
15.1%
16.6%
18.4%
14. 6%
20.9%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 6 of 8
November 15, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case Number:_..:3~1~0~7~5,c_ ____________ _
Project Number:_,0~3~-~0~0=9~0 __________ _
Site: FCX Inc. {Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
Sample No.
527
528
I
Element
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Ni
Se
Tl
V
Zn
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Ni
Se
Tl
V
Zn
Flag
J
UJ
UJ
J
u
J
UJ
J
J
J
J
J
R
J
J
J
UJ
UJ
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Reason
Serial dilution percent difference 18%
Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference 16.5%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference 18.7%
Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Baseline.instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference 11.8%
Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Serial dilution percent difference 15.1%
Matrix spike recovery= 73.1%
Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Serial dilution percent difference 18.4%
Analyte reported as potential false positive
Matrix spike recovery= 62.2%
Matrix spike recovery= 42.7%
Serial dilution percent difference 14.6%
Serial dilution percent difference 20.9%
Serial dilution percent difference
Positives in cal and prep blanks
Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Matrix spike recovery= 73.1%
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Matrix spike recovery= 62.2%
Matrix spike recovery= 42.7%
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
18%
16.5%
18.7%
16.6%
11.8%
16.6%
15.1%
16.6%
18.4%
14.6%
20.9%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 7 of 8
November 15, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case Number:~3~1~0~7~5,,_ ____________ _
Project Number:_.,,0~3~-~0~0~9"--"-0 __________ _
Site: FCX Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
Sample No.
529
530
Element
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Ni
Se
Na
Tl
V
Zn
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Ni
Se
Tl
V
Zn
Flag
UJ
J
J
J
u
J
J
J
UJ
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
UJ
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
UJ
J
J
Reason
Serial dilution percent difference
Positives in cal and prep blanks
Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Serial dilution percent difference·
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Positives in cal and prep blanks
Serial dilution percent difference
Matrix spike recovery= 73.1%
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference=
Matrix spike recovery= 62.2%
18%
16.5%
18.7%
16.6%
11.8%
16.6%
15.1%
16.6%
18.4%
% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures
Matrix spike recovery= 42.7%
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference=
Positives in cal and prep blanks
Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Matrix spike recovery= 73.1%
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Matrix spike recovery= 62.2%
Matrix spike recovery= 42.7%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference=
14.6%
20.9%
18%
16.5%
18.7%
16.6%
11.8%
16.6%
15.1%
16.6%
18.4%
14.6%
20.9%
;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 8 of 8
November 15, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case Number:~3~1~0~7~5~-------------
Project Number:~0~3~--0~0=9~0 __________ _
Site: FCX Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
Sample No.
531
532
Element
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mg
Mn
Ni
Se
Tl
V
Zn
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mg
Mn
Ni
Se
Tl
V
Zn
Flag
UJ
J
J
J
J
UJ
J
J
u
J
J
J
J
J
UJ
J
J
J
J
J
u
R
UJ
J
J
u
J
J
J
J
J
UJ
J
Reason
Serial dilution percent difference
Positives in cal and prep blanks
Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Matrix spike recovery= 71%
18%
Serial dilution percent difference.= 16.5%
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Baseline instability in cal blanks
18. 7%
16.6%
Serial dilution percent difference= 11.8%
Serial dilution percent difference
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference
Matrix spike recovery= 73.1%
Serial dilution percent difference
Serial dilution percent difference
Matrix spike recovery= 62.2%
Matrix spike recovery= 42.7%
16.6%
15.1%
16.6%
18. 4%
Serial dilution percent difference= 14.6%
Baseline instability in blind and prep blanks
Serial dilution percent difference 20.9%
serial dilution percent difference 18%
Matrix spike recovery= 68.6%
Matrix spike recovery= 71%
Serial dilution percent difference 16.5%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Analyte reported as potential false positive
serial dilution percent difference= 18.7%
Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference 11.8%
Serial dilution percent difference 16.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference= 15.1%
Matrix spike recovery= 73.1%
Serial dilution percent difference= 16.6%
Serial dilution percent difference= 18.4%
Matrix spike recovery= 62.2%
Matrix spike recovery= 42.7%
Serial dilution percent difference 14.6%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Serial dilution percent difference 20.9%
--- ---IETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ------EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Sample 517 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW27S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
28000 J
1.5 UJ
4.2 UJ
480 J
2.4 U
0.30 U
1600
74 J
55 J
100 J
60000 J
16
15000 J
2000 J
0.10 U
74 J
12000
3.4 R
0.80 U
8000
2.4 UJ
88 J
200 J
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT0
D No: 1KT0
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:10
Ending:
average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. ·
/.:,. Page 1 of 1
.. -- - - ---IETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 518 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: 8801 HBW /
Media:TRIP BLANK· WATER
RESULTS
57 UJ
1.2 UJ
3.0 UJ
0.30 UJ
0.20 U
0.30 U
15 U
0.80 UJ
0.70 UJ
1.5 UJ
12 UJ
1.2 U
12 UJ
0.20 UJ
0.10 U
1.0 UJ
40 U
3.0 UJ
0.80 U
300 U
2.4 UJ
0.70 UJ
1.1 UJ
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
:YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KS5 lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
.-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interterences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
-----llliil
Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning' 10/17/2002 16:00
Ending:
:-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit. :-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. , ..
Page 1 of 1
liiil
---.. llilil 11111 -liiiil illil
!ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 519 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXMWB /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
40000 J UG/L ALUMINUM
2.9 UJ UG/L ANTIMONY
6.2 UJ UG/L ARSENIC
640 J UG/L BARIUM
6.2 UG/L BERYLLIUM
0.30 U UG/L CADMIUM
5000 UG/L CALCIUM
210 J UG/L CHROMIUM
42 UJ UG/L COBALT
130 J UG/L COPPER
99000 J UG/L IRON
43 UG/L LEAD
15000 J UG/L MAGNESIUM
1100 J UG/L MANGANESE
0.10 U UG/L TOTAL MERCURY
72 J UG/L NICKEL
11000 UG/L POTASSIUM
4.7 J UG/L SELENIUM
0.80 U UG/L SILVER
1200 UG/L SODIUM
2.4 UJ UG/L THALLIUM
240 J UG/L VANADIUM
320 J UG/L ZINC
NA UG/L CYANIDE
YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KS8
D No: 1KS8
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
----Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:35
Ending:
-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. , ... Page 1 of 1
----IETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS --.. EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
. Sample 520 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXDUP1 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
24000 J
2.9 UJ
4.6 UJ
360 J
3.4 U
0.30 U
3600
140 J
24 J
73 J
58000 J
26
8900 J
630 J
0.10 U
47 J
6300
4.3 J
0.80 U
1800
2.4 UJ
140 J
200 J
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
. ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
YAN I DE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KS9
D No: 1KS9
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interterences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
.. -Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:45
Ending:
actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. -qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
v.--Page 1 of 1
.. - ---.. --IETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
.. Sample 521 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCSMW5S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
R!:SIJI.TS
20000 J
1.2 UJ
5.3 UJ
630 J
1.9 U
0.30 U
2800
99 J
32 UJ
78 J
64000 J
26
11000 J
1500 J
0.10 U
72 J
11000
3.0 UJ
0.80 U
3100
2.4 UJ
93 J
130 J
NA
IJN!TS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ll.N.dl VTF'
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT1
D No: 1KT1
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
-Production Date: 11/21/200214:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 10:25
Ending:
-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater then value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification . ...... Page 1.of 1
---lillil IETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
iliiil -EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 522 FY 2003 Project:
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCSMW5D /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
78 UJ UG/L ALUMINUM
1.4 UJ UG/L ANTIMONY
3.0 UJ UG/L ARSENIC
31 J UG/L BARIUM
0.20 U UG/L BERYLLIUM
0.30 U UG/L CADMIUM
30000 UG/L CALCIUM
1.2 R UG/L CHROMIUM
0.70 UJ UG/L COBALT
2.5 R UG/L COPPER
310 J UG/L IRON
1.2 U UG/L LEAD
5000 J UG/L MAGNESIUM
120 J UG/L MANGANESE
0.10 U UG/L TOTAL MERCURY
1.8 J UG/L NICKEL
3000 UG/L POTASSIUM
3.0 UJ UG/L SELENIUM
0.80 U UG/L SILVER
12000 UG/L SODIUM
2.4 UJ UG/L THALLIUM
0.70 UJ UG/L VANADIUM
18 UJ UG/L ZINC
NA UG/L CYANIDE
(ANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
03-0090
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT2
D No: 1KT2
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
.. ---Production Date: 11/21/200214:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 10:30
Ending:
average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumpllve evidence of presence of material.
actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantilation limit.
qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
.. .. .. .. ----ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
.. Sample 523 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant) Statesville, NC
Program: SF Case No: 31075
Id/Station: FCSW29I / MD No: 1KT3
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KT3
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
57 UJ UG/L "', ....... , .. nL.VIYUl,,,VIVI
1.2 UJ UG/L ANTIMONY
3.0 UJ UG/L ARSENIC
75 J UG/L BARIUM
0,20 U UG/L BERYLLIUM
0.30 U UG/L CADMIUM
5800 UG/L CALCIUM
0.80 UJ UG/L CHROMIUM
0.70 UJ UG/L COBALT
2.3 J UG/L COPPER
100 UJ UG/L IRON
3.0 U UG/L LEAD
3600 J UG/L MAGNESIUM
17 J UG/L MANGANESE
0.10 U UG/L TOTAL MERCURY
1.5 J UG/L NICKEL
5800 UG/L POTASSIUM
3.0 U_J UG/L SELENIUM
0.80 U UG/L SILVER
14000 UG/L SODIUM
2.4 UJ UG/L THALLIUM
0.70 UJ UG/L VANADIUM
18 UJ UG/L ZINC
NA UG/L CYANIDE
'ANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 11 :00
Ending:
1verage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estlmated value. N-pr8sumptive evidence of presence of material.
tctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
ic indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification . ....
Page 1 of 1
iiiiil liiiiil ------ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 524 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant) Statesville, NC
Program: SF Case No: 31075
Id/Station: FCXDUP2 I MD No: 1KT4
Media: GROUNDWATER DNo:1KT4
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
57 UJ UG/L ALUMINUM
1.2 UJ UG/L ANTIMONY
3.0 UJ UG/L ARSENIC
74 J UG/L BARIUM
0.20 U UG/L BERYLLIUM
0.30 U UG/L CADMIUM
5600 UG/L CALCIUM
0.80 UJ UG/L CHROMIUM
0.70 UJ UG/L COBALT
2.4 J UG/L COPPER
44 UJ UG/L IRON
2.3 U UG/L LEAD
3500 J UG/L MAGNESIUM
16 J UG/L MANGANESE
0.10 U UG/L TOTAL MERCURY
1.6J UG/L NICKEL
5700 UG/L POTASSIUM
3.0 UJ UG/L SELENIUM
0.80 U UG/L SILVER
14000 UG/L SODIUM
2.4 UJ UG/L THALLIUM
0.70 UJ UG/L VANADIUM
13 UJ UG/L ZINC
NA UG/L CYANIDE
(ANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
---.. ---Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:45
Ending:
average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterlerences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
\/,· Page 1 of 1
--- ---liiil iilil -:TALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
. Sample 525 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCSMW6D /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
63 UJ
1.3 UJ
3.0 UJ
9.8 J
0.20 U
0.46 U
8000
0.80 UJ
0.70 UJ
3.2 J
79 UJ
1.2 U
2300 J
8.9 J
0.10 U
1.6 R
1300
3.0 UJ
0.80 U
6200
2.4 UJ
0.70 UJ
25 J
NA
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
ANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT5
D No: 1KT5
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
.. .. Production Date: 11/21/200214:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 13:15
Ending:
verage value. NA-not analyzed. NAHnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
ctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed tor but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
c indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is nec&Ssary for verification. ,. Page 1 of 1
.. iiiil .. -----ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 526 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXW25S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
39000 J
2.8 UJ
14 J
1000 J
4.7 U
0,30 U
4700
270
99 J
250 J
110000 J
34
6100 J
2400 J
0.10 U
48 J
4000
3.8 J
0.80 U
4000
2.4 UJ
310 U
130 J
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
'ANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT6
D No: 1KT6
\
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interierences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
.. Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:00
Ending:
1ctua\ value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. 1c Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is neces~ary for verification. ,,,
Page 1 of 1
liiil
lilil llliJ liiil ---ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 527 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXMW6S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
20000 J UG/L ALUMINUM
2.1 UJ UG/L ANTIMONY
5.1 UJ UG/L ARSENIC
270 J UG/L BARIUM
1.4 U UG/L BERYLLIUM
0.30 U UG/L CADMIUM
130 UG/L CALCIUM
49 J UG/L CHROMIUM
32 UJ UG/L COBALT
47 J UG/L COPPER
53000 J UG/L IRON
25 UG/L LEAD
8400 J UG/L MAGNESIUM
1300 J UG/L MANGANESE
0.28 UG/L TOTAL MERCURY
46 J UG/L NICKEL
9800 UG/L POTASSIUM
3.1 R UG/L SELENIUM
0.80 U UG/L SILVER
14000 UG/L SODIUM
2.4 UJ UG/L THALLIUM
71 J UG/L VANADIUM
140 J UG/L ZINC
NA UG/L CYANIDE
VANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT7
DNo: 1KT7
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
·average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
--11111 -.. .. Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 13:05
Ending:
-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon tlmit.
-qc Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. 1;,-Page 1 of 1
.
liiill ------ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 528 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: PB102302 /
Media: PRESERVATIVE BLANK
RESULTS
57 UJ
1.2 UJ
3.0 UJ
0.30 UJ
0.20 U
0.30 U
15 U
0.80 UJ
0.70 UJ
1.5 UJ
13 UJ
1.2 U
12 UJ
0.20 UJ
0.10 U
1.0 UJ
40 U
3.0 UJ
0.80 U
300 U
2.4 UJ
0.70 UJ
1.1 UJ
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
.6.Ndl VTI=
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW0
D No: 1KW0
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
-.. .. -11111
Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:50
Ending:
-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification. ,.,.. Page 1 of 1
-.. ----ET ALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS ------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Sample 529 FY 2003 Project:
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXEB /
Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
57 UJ UG/L ALUMINUM
1.2 UJ UG/L ANTIMONY
3.0 UJ UG/L ARSENIC
0.30 UJ UG/L BARIUM
0.20 U UG/L BERYLLIUM
0.30 U UG/L CADMIUM
15 U UG/L CALCIUM
0.80 UJ UG/L CHROMIUM
0.70 UJ UG/L COBALT
1.9 J UG/L COPPER
25 UJ UG/L IRON
1.2 U UG/L LEAD
12 UJ UG/L MAGNESIUM
0.20 UJ UG/L MANGANESE
0.10 U UG/L TOTAL MERCURY
1.0 UJ UG/L NICKEL
40 U UG/L POTASSIUM
3.0 UJ UG/L SELENIUM
0.80 U UG/L SILVER
330 J UG/L SODIUM
2.4 UJ UG/L THALLIUM
0.70 UJ UG/L VANADIUM
1.1 UJ UG/L ZINC
NA UG/L CYANIDE
I ANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
03-0090
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW1
D No: 1KW1
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:45
Ending:
3.verage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
\:,· Page 1 of 1
- -------.. ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 530 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXOFB /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
57 UJ
1.2 UJ
3.0 UJ
0.30 UJ
0.20 U
0.30 U
15 U
0.80 UJ
0.70 UJ
1.5 UJ
13 UJ
1.2 U
12 UJ
0.20 UJ
0.10 U
1.0 UJ
40 U
3.0 UJ
0.80 U
300 U
3.0 UJ
0.70 UJ
1.1 UJ
NA
lltr.llTC .... , .. ,-.1
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
. SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANAOIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
'ANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW2
D No: 1KW2
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
--.. Production Date: 11/21/200214:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Aequestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14 20
Ending:
1verage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
1ctual vatua is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quanlitation limit.
lC indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. ,,.,..
Page 1 ol 1
--------ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 531 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXW24S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
OCC-111 T<" ..... ~ ........ ~
460 UJ
1.2 UJ
3.0 UJ
85 J
0.20 U
0.30 U
14000
3.9 J
1.2 UJ
9.2 J
1400 J
1.5 U
2900 J
200 J
0.10 U
6.2 J
18000
3.0 UJ
0.80 U
3300
2.4 UJ
1.4 UJ
36 J
NA
, ......... v1u1-;;,
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
(ANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW3
D No: 1KW3
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value.· N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
-liiil
Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59 ·
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 11 :30
Ending:
actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
\/, Page 1 of 1
liiE
iiiil liiiJ liiiil ---:ETALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 532 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXMW7 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
860 J
1.2 UJ
3.0 UJ
160 J
0.36 U
0.30 U
1900
2.4 R
7.8 UJ
4.6 J
1300 J
2.1 U
3400 J
170 J
0.10 U
8.5 J
2100
3.0 UJ
0.80 U
31000
2.4 UJ
1.4 UJ
46 J
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
:YANIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW4
D No: 1KW4
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
\-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
--Production Date: 11/21/2002 14:59
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 15:15
Ending:
~-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
l-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is neces.sary for verification. ,,, Page 1 of 1
lliil
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMORANDUM
Da.te: 11/27/2002
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
.Region 4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
I. '.ft .. } .•.. lib. 1.'ec . .i: .. ··:···R·····.esults of VOLATILE~ Sample An. alys. is · ·-;_ti · /' ··.03,0090 • FCX, Inc: (Statesville Plant)
"·'' '· ,,_, .. ·,. ·. • · i,tatesville, NC ·
I From: Messer, Edward ~~
I
I
I
To: Mallary, Ken
CC: Jo.e Ferentz
RACSNJ
Thru: QA Office
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have any I questions, please contact me.
I
I
I
I
I
H
I I ATTACHMENT
Sample 517 FY 2003 Project 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
State~~me!Nc .. · .
Id/Station: MW27S I
Media: GROUNDWATER
• cJ~eNo:31075
. MON~:· i KTo
D No: 1KTO
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.10 J
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U ·a.sou
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2.6
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE .
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE.:
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE .
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T·BUTYL ETHER (MTBE).
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE " .
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE .,, . , . ., ..
~~~;~~ETETRACHLORIDE .;.:1,\;:}, >:·
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE . \i:; . , . .
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)•
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE . . . . .
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
~ -·-liiil 11111 · liial Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor: '
Project Leader: KMALLARY,
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:10
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1 ,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
· CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBR_OMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAHnterferences. J-estimal8d'.Value. N-Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actuci.l ~81u8 '11:fk"!own to be greater than value given. LI-material was anat}'zed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be pr~sent. resampling and reanalysls is necessary for verificalio~. · ·.
Page 1 of 1
liii)v ._,iiiiJ:_, .oiili] L.C: '.liiill. T ;:,ilillil -Sample 519 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090.
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant}
Program: SF
Statesvm~: N6
Case No: 31075
. MD.No: 1KS8
p:1'/?J)K~B
Id/Station: FCXMWB /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ,o c
CHLOROMETHANE ·;•'
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE ..
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE '(FREON 11}'
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
. RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE ..
. 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
. 0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.12 J
5.0 U
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHEN.E C'
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1 · TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE .
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE . , i .:.;,/ ·'. ·
BROMODICHLOROMETHANi:"'-:.' .
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE-
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE. :
i~~~~~\DICHLOROPROPENe'',
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ..
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE . . .
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMAL.LARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:35
Ending:
UNITS·
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYl:E
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE .
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE$
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CH.LOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
i
'
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , K•rt~al value is_ known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anafyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1 . . . . .. ~ . ' . • • J • ·• •<
-----~A.-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA .,.,.. -- -----· -Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Sample 520 FY 2003 Project: 03·0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case.No: 31075
MD No: 1KS9 Id/Station: FCXDUP1 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KS9
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,(F,REON · 11)
1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHYLENE)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
1, 1,2·TRICHLORO·1,2,2·TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE --,-'
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 l,I
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0,50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.16 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.054 J
5.0 U
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS• 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T·BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHANE
CIS·1,2·DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1 •TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2·DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2·DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CtS•1,3·DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL tSOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE -.
TRANS·1,3•DtCHLOROPROPENE _--: , --
1, 1,2·TRICHLOROETHANE _ __ _ _ . __
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE ,-, ; _\ ----
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Request or:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:45
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.-
UG/L -
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2·DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE$
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
tSOPROPYLBENZENE
_ . 1·, 1,2,2·TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3·DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2·DIBROMO·3·CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. •
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was analYzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be.present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 521 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Faciliiy: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: -SF _
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: FCSMW5S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT1
D No: 1KT1
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.043 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.77
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOAOETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE --• ,
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE) ·-_·
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE .-..
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE •
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
RESULTS
-0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 l:J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
-------iiiil -Proauction Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 10:25
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE$
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE_
1, 1 ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DtCHLOROBENZENE -
1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE-
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterterences. J-estimated. value. N_-presumptive evidence of presence of materiBI.
K-actual value is known lo be less than value given. L-actual v8tU8 '1s· kriown:tO be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the r:r,inimum quantitation limit.
R-qc·indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be preSent. resamPling and rE!analysis ls necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1 . ' -· · .. , ..
-.A -RoN ftso~ENP,11 ---· ---· .. Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Sample 522 FY 2003
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc.· (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
•·"""
Statesville; NC
Id/Station: FCSMW5D /
Media:GROUNDWATER
Case No: 31075
MD No.: 1KT2
DNo: 1KT2-
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.1
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.72
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
7.7
12
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.32 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.22 J
7.1
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.19 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
30
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE · . ·
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) .. c
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE .
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE .
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2· TRICHLOROETHANE .
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
. RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.54
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.46 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced b·y: Messer, Edw~rd .
R8questor:
· Project Leader: KMALLARY:
Beginning: 10/23/200210:30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DtCHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DtCHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DtCHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4•TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
I
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estim8ted:V8iue.-N-presUmptlve evidence of presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual val_ue·iS known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analYzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may no~ be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.·
Page 1 of 1
Sample 523 ·FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: FCSW29I /
Media: GROUNDWATER
·Case No: 31075
'MD.No: 1KT3 o N8: iKT3. lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
a.sou
0.50 U a.sou
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2.8
4.0 J
7.6
0.20 J
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
4.8
8.2
5.0 U
0.50 U
1.2
0.23 J
0.50 U
0.17 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
4.6
0.50 U
0.76
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
30
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE '·.
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ·. , ._... . .
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE . . .
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
RESULTS
· 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U a.sou
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U a.sou a.sou
0.50 U
0.50 U
---·--liiill · lilll Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor: .
Project Leader: KMALLARY;
Beginning: 10/23/2002 11 :06
Ending: ·
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L ·
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2·0/BROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROB_ENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-0/CHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-a\lerage value. NA-not analyzed. NAHnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. . K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value js _known to be greater than value given. U-material was ana1S,zed for but not detected. ~he number is the minimum quantltation limit. R--qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not b~'Ptesent. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liiil,L,,.-, ~,111111.C .aalllv:;1:11111 11111
Sample 524 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facilily: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
StatesvilleiNC
ld/Slalion: FCXDUP2 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
. Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT4
D No: 1KT4
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
· 0.50 U
2.9
4.6 J
5.0 U
0.12 J
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.11 J
0.50 U
5.3
9.0
5.0 U
0.50 U
1.3
0.26 J
0.50 U
0.21 J a.sou
0.10 J
4.9
0.50 U
0.77
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
31
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE .
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE .
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE , ....... ·
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE : C:-,· .. ',,ic
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE J;,tJ-<·.
METHYLISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE.
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE .
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
RESULTS
· 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
· 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY·
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:45
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG_/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROB_ENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
K-actua/ value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anal;lzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qb indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and ·reanalysis is necessary for verification. .
I .-, _ . ·. • . . •;• .,. _ .,. Page 1 of 1
111111111!::,LA~ S ... E A""1.,s1~
Sample 525 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
· I Id/Station: FCSMW6D /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT5
D No: 1KT5
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
: RESULTS UNITS
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
2.5 UG/L
0.16 J UG/L
5.0 U UG/L
0.072 J UG/L
0.50 UR UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
1.3 UG/L
5.0 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
4.5 UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 UJ UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
7.2 UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
5.0 U UG/L
0.059 J UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L .
61 UG/L
5.0 U UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
~~1'c~~g~;F~~~ROMETHAN~/(F,R~ON),i)
1, 1-DtCHLOROETHENE (1, 1 ·DICHU01:10ETHYLENE)
1,1,2·TRICHLOR0-1,2,2•TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE . .
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T•BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHANE .
CIS·1,2·DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLORQETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE :r,0i(;':•
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ..
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE.· .. CL · ... ·:
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHlOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE :::',;.\) ·•·". . .=··',_:,
RESULTS
· 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
. 0.50 U
. 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
------· .. Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 13:15
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE$
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
·ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
· 1 ;4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE . ·
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
. ;
•
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterierences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ,
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anal~zed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound _may or may not b_e present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1 ... ,. •
--lllliil liiiill lilil llill --~A -Rl:GTON IV SESD, ATHENS, GA _.,
iiiil -- -----Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Sample 526 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesvllle,/NC
Id/Station: FCXW25S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT6
D No: 1KT6
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.75
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.16 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L ·
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
.!:~~~~~HLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFtg~~9ETHAt:,IE (FREON 113)
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE -i •
TRANS-1 2-DICHLOROETHENf,:. ;s:-·
METHYL T·BUTYL ETHER (MTEfib'i -
1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHANE ---
CIS· 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE -
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE -
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS·1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS• 1,3·DICHLOROPROPENE :-•
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ---.,_ -
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U _
0.50 U
0.50 U
-0.50 U
0.50 U
_0.50 U
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L -
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM -_
ISOPROP'fLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
-1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE -
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE --
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
-1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interf8rences. J-estlrriated .value .. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. ,
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. l-actual v8.lue _Is·. known to be greater than value given. U-mater_ial was analYzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc Indicates tnat data unusable-.-compound rnaY Or may not_ be,~r=e_Se~_t. :_r~sampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 527 FY 2003 Project:
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. {Statesville Plant)
Program: SF ·
liiil
03-009~Hifi •.•
Statesville, NC.
Id/Station: FCXMW6S I
Media: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT7
ONo:1KT7
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.25 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UGI!.
UGI!.
UGI!.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGI!.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGI!.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGI!.
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) ·
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE ..
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE : ..
CYCLOHEXANE .iii-0,:7
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DtCHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE .
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
---· -----Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by:_ Messer, Edward
Requester:· . .
Project Le.ader: !<MALLARY·
Beginning: 10/23/2002 13:05
Ending:
UNITS
UGI!.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XY°LENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl•lnterferences. J-estlffiat"~~: .~alU~.-:'N~~resumptive evidence of presence of material. ,
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual•.itali.ie:ls knoWTl to ti8 Q"reater than value given. LI-material was anat}/zed for but not detected. the null'lber Is the minimum quantltation limit.
R-qc indicates_lhat data.unusable. compound rTlay or may not bB pre·se~t. ··re.Sampl!ng and reanalysis Is necessary for verifi~ti_on. ., , . . ·
· · · · · · · · · · Page 1 of 1
....... .,
f:!11:!uL~::i ~LE Aiii. YSliilll! -.A. •aNRso~EN~ iiiil -------Produc::tion Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
I
Sample . 528 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
•• •II,
Id/Station: PB102302 /
Media: PRESERVATIVE BLANK
Case No: 31075
MD'N6: .1 KWO
D No: 1KWO · . ,-., ,. ,•
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
18
0.50 U
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
1.3
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.24 J
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.16 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE ·.
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE·
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE :. • :, .
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHWROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE . ... .· . . .
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ... •
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ·:
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPEr-lE,
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 l:J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
· 0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Messer, Edward·
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:5p
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETH.YL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
tSOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known \o be greater than value given. U-material Was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
R-qc Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. · resB.mpling and reanatYsis iS necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
"···
Sample 529 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesviiie Piant)
Program: SF
-
Id/Station: FCXEB /
Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK
Stalesvjlle, NC
CaseNo: 31075.
MDNo:·1KW1
D No: 1KW1
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY .
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
9.3
0.50 U
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.070 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.055 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/1.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHAt;E_c;-, ; . :
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE , (FREON .11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2·TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS· 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T·BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHANE .
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE .
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1 ·TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE .: .: , . .
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) ·
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE . . .
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE.'
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE >Jlt·
TOLUENE . '· ..
TRANS• 1 ,3·DICHLOROPROPENE ·
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE . . . .
RESULTS
·. 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
. 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
liiil ----·-Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Request or:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:45
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
. ANALYTE
. 01BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE ·, •
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2.3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-inlerferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual va·1ue Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected: the number is the minlmum quantitation timlt.
R•qr -~ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necltssary tor verilic~~o~. • ,, ,;,,, .-Page
1
of
1
!Ill, L..m.s slliii\.E Alilili vs1jiliil --Sample 529 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC·
Id/Station: FCXEB /
Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK
RESULTS UNITS
11 NJ UG/L
ANALYTE
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW1
D Nq: 1KW1
DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence Ct matertal.
.. --11111 --.. Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward .
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:45
Ending:
K-actual value Is known to.be less than value given. L-actual value ls)<.nown to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. tt,e number is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
. .
t ... --·
llllbu•IIIJs s-.e .ia!vs1-
Sample 530 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090 :':\ ":
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: FCXOFB /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW2
D No: 1KW2
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
.0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U a.sou a.sou
0.50 UJ
5.3 a.sou
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ a.sou a.sou
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U a.sou a.sou
5.0 U
0.062 J
0.50 U
0.50 U a.sou
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON-11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE.
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE '
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE:.
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE . .
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TET.RACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE . . . . . .
RESULTS
0.50 U a.sou a.sou
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U a.sou
0.50 U
0.50 U a.sou a.sou
0.50 U a.sou ·a.sou·
. 0.50 U
liiill
_Produced by: Messer, Edward
Request or:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:20
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1',3-DICHLOROBENZENE .
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
·1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
· 1,2,DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1 ;2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnt~rlerences. J-esufT{~t~c{v~i-ue.-_N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. \
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual valUe.lS known to be greater than value ~van. -LI-material was anal'yzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be·pt~sent._ resampling and reanalysis 1s necessary t&r verification. _ ·
·· · Page 1 of 1
lilll1 iiiilA : FRbN ""'1s o, WIENl,l!llfi .. Sample 531 FY 2003 Project:· 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesvi!!e P!ant)
Program: SF
Siates~i1i~iNc
,_,,.,
Id/Station: FCX.W24S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW3
. D No: 1KW3
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.7
2.5 J
13
0.50 U
0.50 R
0.50 U
0.10 J
0.50 U
3.2
4.4
5:o u
0.50 U
0.71
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.7
0.50 U
0.29 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
25
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DI.CHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE .
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE :
BENZENE
.1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE .
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Messer, E.dward
Requestor:·
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 11 :30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLORO~ENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROF'YLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmated _value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ._
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual V81ueJS kllown·to be greater than value given. U-materlal was anaf°yzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantltation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusabfe. compound may or may noi be,pr8§e'ht..-resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification. · ;
· · · · · · Paoe 1 of 1
--Sample 532 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant) StatesviUe, NC Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXMW7 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Case No:_ 3.1075
MD.No: 1KW4
D No:.1KW4
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UR
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U a.sou
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U ·a.sou
0.50 U a.sou
0.13 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGiL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE . . . . TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1·DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE .
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE .. "
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE .
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE· . '·, .. , ..
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ..
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE , · • •
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE, <, ..
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
RESULTS
· ci.50 U
0.50 U a.sou a.sou
0.50 U a.sou
0.50 U a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou
0.50 U
-- - ---··-. Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer. Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 15:15
Ending:
UNITS
·uG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
· CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIB ROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE. (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3· TRICHLOROBENZENE
'
A-al.rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material·. • . . · . . . K-aC:tual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual vallle Is known to be greater than value given. U-materiat was analYzed for but not detect1d. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis ls necessary for verification. ·
Paae 1 of 1
-Sample 533 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXTB01 I
Statesville, NC
Case. No: 310_75
•• •I',
Media:TRIP BLANK· WATER D No: iKTB .· Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.38 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.13 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE .
CHLOROMETHANE '·' '·'· ,:•.
VINYL CHLORIDE · '.i;t)X:
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE ..... ·'·' :
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE' (FREON 11)
1, 1·DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2·TRICHLOR0-1,2,2·TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T•BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHANE
CIS·1,2·DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1·TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2·DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE {TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE . . . . .
1,2·DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE.
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE.
TOLUENE . ,,, .' .,;
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE·":'
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE .. , .
TETRACHLOROETHENE {TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE . .
RESULTS
· 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterlerences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
--- -------------Proauction Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 17:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMC)ETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE ·.· '
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL'XYLENES .
STYRENE.
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0·3·CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4•TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
K-actual value ls known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is ~nown to be_J;lreater than value giv_en. U-material was analy'zed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitatlon limit. R-qc Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be pr~sent. resamp11ng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Paae 1 ol 1
lliiiil
Sample 536 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXINFLU /
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
redia: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KT9 Org Contractor: SHEALY
ESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
I 0.50 U UGIL DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE .
0.50 U UG/L CHLOROMETHANE
0.50 U UGIL VINYL CHLORIDE
0.50 U UG/L BROMOMETHANE
0.50 U UG/L CHLOROETHANE
0.50 U UG/L TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE .(FREON 11)
0.50 U UG/L 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE (1,1°DICHLOROETHYLENE)
0.57 J UGIL 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) 5.0 U UGIL ACETONE . . .· . .
0.50 U UG/L CARBON DISULFIDE
0.50 UR UGIL METHYL ACETATE
0.50 U UG/L METHYLENE CHLORIDE
0.38 J UG/L TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE ..
0.50 U UG/L METHYL T·BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) ·, ·
2.2 UGIL 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE .
10 UG/L CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
5.0 U UGIL METHYL ETHYL KETONE
0.50 U UG/L BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
2.2 UG/L CHLOROFORM
0.50 U UG/L 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
0.50 U UGIL CYCLOHEXANE
0.094 J UG/L CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
0.50 U UGIL BENZENE
0.07 4 J UGIL 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
2.2 UGIL TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
0.50 U UGIL METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
0.50 U UGIL 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
0.50 U UG/L BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
0.50 U UG/L CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE. ·
5.0 U UG/L METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
0.50 U UGIL TOLUENE
0.50 U UGIL TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
0.50 U UG/L 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
38 UGIL TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
5.0 U UG/L. METHYL BUTYL KETONE . ·. . . .
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
-------Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 15:30
Ending:
UNITS
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L ·
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
-1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
-1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,3:TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estim~t~\~1ue. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyi:ed for but not detected~ the number Is the minimum quantitation limll.
A-qc indicates that dat.a_ unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Paqe 1 of 1
Sample 537 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXTB02 /
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
Medla:TAIP BLANK· WATER D No: 1KW5 Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.066 J
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50.U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.22 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.062 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0,50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2·TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) . ACETONE .
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS· 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1 ·DICHLOROETHANE
CIS· 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2·DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,J·DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOR.OETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0,50 U
0.50 U
-ililill ---... -Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: .10/23/2002 17:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
· 1,1,2,2•TETRACHLOROETHANE
. 1,3-DiCHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMO·J•CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) ·1 ,2,4·TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2,J·TRICHLOROBENZENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was analy·Zed for" but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. ·compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is neceSsB.'ry for verification.
Paqe 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMORANDUM ·
Date: 11/27/2002
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
Subject: Results of PESTICIDES/PCEl.Sample Analysis
03-0090 FCX, Inc. (Stat(isvill~.plant) . . '· ..
Statesville, NC '
From: Messer, Edward &~~~
· To: Mallary, Ken
CC: Joe Ferentz
RACS/W
Thru: QA Office
· Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have any
1 questions, please contact me.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT
_,,, 1~/1-'~MFlllllNAilllls -
Sample 517 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville; NC
·Id/Station: MW27S /
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT0
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KT.0· .
RESULTS UNITS
0.010 UJ UGIL
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UGIL
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UGIL
0.010 UJ UGIL
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UGIL
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UGIL
0.10UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0 .020 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.008 JN UG/L
1.0 UJ UG/L
0.20 UJ UG/L
0.40 UJ UG/L
0.20 UJ UGIL
0.20 UJ UGIL
0.20 UJ UG/L
0.20 UJ UG/L
0.20 UJ UGIL
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
. BETA-BHC
DELTA·BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) ·., t(J~f
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'·DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN 11 (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'·DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'·DDn
. METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PC8·1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
iiiil ---iiiil liiill · ----Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:1 o
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyied for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be preserit. resampling and reanalysls is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see chlordane.conslltuents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1 I . .
-,Tl!lllstP<IIJlllo.M~NAlilllls --Sample 519 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: FCXMW8 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ESULTS UNITS
!0.010 UR UG/L
'0.010 UR UGIL
0.010 UR UG/L
0.010 UR UG/L
0.010 UR UGIL
0.010 UR UG/L
0.010 UR UGIL
0.010 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UGIL
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UGIL
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.10 UR UGIL
0.020 UR UGIL
0.020 UR UGIL
0.010 UR UG/L
0.010 UR UG/L
1.0 UR UG/L
0.20 UR UGIL
0.40 UR UG/L
0.20 UR UGIL
0.20 UR UGIL
0.20 UR UGIL
0.20 UR UG/L
0.20 UR UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE 12
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KS8
D No: 1KS8
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
liiiilil -- -liiiil. -Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
· Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:35
Ending:
A-average Value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. •,
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual valueJs k·nown to be greater than value given. U-material was analy:!ed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compour,d may or may not be preSent. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
C·confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
Sample 520 .FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
.• . .
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Slalesville Planl)
Program: SF
Slatesville, ic
. Id/Station: FCXDUP1 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'·DDE)
. ENDRIN
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KS9
D No:.1KS9
RESULTS UNITS
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UG/L
p.010 UJ UG/L
'0.010 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
!•~~~i~~::ii~[~E • :'1J4t~1:, (i• ,, .
0.10 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.020 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UG/L
0.010 UJ UG/L
1.0 UJ UG/L
0.20 UJ UG/L
0.40 UJ UG/L
0.20 UJ UG/L
0.20 UJ UG/L
0.20 UJ UG/L
0.20 UJ UG/L
0.20 UJ UG/L
4,4'-DDT (P,P'·DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
. PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
lliil ..... ---· -Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
. Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:45
Ending:
·• ! rn~,~:~i: .-. :
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimateCi.v&lue. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. \ · -. . •:
K-actual value Is known-to be less than value given. L-actual Va1U8 ls:known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyi:ed for but not detected. the nur,:iber Is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that d_ata unuSable. compound may or may not b8.pre"s81it. res·amp1!ng and reanalysis Is necessary for verification; ·
C-confirmed,by gqr:ns: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane coristituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1 . . . . -. . •, ,:•~':;:,. i~
-· . • -RaiN 1\111!;0, ..M!Ns,W
Sample 521 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090 · . ., .. , .. ·
PESTICIDES SCAN
Faciiiiy: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case'No: 31075
Id/Station: FCSMWSS /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
3.7 C
3.3
2.0 U
8.1 C
2.0 U
0.023
2.0 U
2.0 U
4.0 U
O.Q18J
4.0 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
0.048 J
4.2
4.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
200 U
40 U
80 U
40 U
40 U
40 U
40 U
40 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LJNDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXJDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'·DDE)
ENDRJN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'·DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE ./2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
.MoMliKT1
D No:,1KT1
......
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
liiil ilifJrocfflon 'ffflle: 1~/2offl 4:4,-i
Produced by: Messer, Edwar~
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY ·
Beginning: 10/23/2002 10:25.
Ending: · ·
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterterences. J-estfmated_va_lue. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ,
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L•actual value is"known to be greater than value given. U•material was analyied for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be_p~esent. .. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification. ·
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents _2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1 .. •.;,_. . •:?:·.~t'.\.'_:· .. ·"' ·.. -
-: <;::-1:tr. -~,'-·.-:
isample 522 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCSMWSD I
Media: GROUNDWATER
Statesvili~;NC ·
Case.No: 31075
MCJNo: 1KT2.
."D•No:•1KT2
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
0.66 J UG/L ALPHA·BHC
0.20 UG/L. BETA•BHC
0.034 UR UG/L DELTA-BHC
0.48 J UG/L GAMMA·BHC (LINDANE)
0.032 UR UG/L HEPTACHLOR
0.010 UR UG/L . ALDRIN
0.010 UR UG/L HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
0.010 UR UG/L ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
0.020 UR UG/L DIELDRIN
0.020 UR UG/L 4,4'-DDE (P,P'·DDE)
0.020 UR UG/L ENDRIN
0.020 UR UG/L ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
0.020 UR UG/L 4,4'•000 (P,P'·DDD)
0.020 UR UG/L ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.020 UR UG/L 4,4'-DDT (P,P'·DDT)
0.10 UR UG/L METHOXYCHLOR
0.020 UR UG/L ENDRIN KETONE
,0.020 UR UG/L ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
'0.010 UR UG/L ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
0.043 NJ UG/L . GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
1.0 UR UG/L TOXAPHENE
0.20 UR UG/L PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
0.40 UR UG/L PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) . ; ,~·,:{
0.20 UR UG/L PCB· 1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
0.20 UR UG/L PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
0.20 UR UG/L PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
0.20 UR UG/L PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) ·
0.20 UR UG/L PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
-llill iilliiil ' liilil liiil . ililll Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requesto;:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 10:30
Ending:·
A-avj;age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interler~nces. J·eslimated value. N-presumplive evidence of presence of material.. , · .
K-actµa, value is known.to be less than value given. L-actual value ls.known to be greater"than value given. U-material was analyied for but not detected. the number is the minimum quar\titation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be_·present.. r8sampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. · ·
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlorda~~·~O~Stit_ueryts 2.cOnstituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
--RBN l~D, -NS"' liiiil ail 1iii11 11111 liiiil liiiil . IMl
Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Sample 523 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
, lcl/Slation: FCSW29I /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case.No: 31075
MD No: 1KT3
RESULTS
0.031
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.032
0.0024 JN
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020U
0.10 U
0.038
0.020 U
0.010 U
0.019 U
1.0U
0.20 U
0.40 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA·BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN 11 (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'·DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
D No: 1KT3
·-'I\
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
Produced by: Messer,. Edward
Requestor:
Project Leader. KMALLARY
. Beginning: 10/23/2002 11 :00
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated.val_ue. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value· Js known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was analyi:ed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation llmil. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metatH?lites of technical chlordane
I ,.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 524 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: FCXDUP2 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
0.012
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.012
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.10 U
0.015 JN
0.020 U
0.010 U
0.018
1.0 U
0.20 U
0.40U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P ,P'·DDE)
ENDRIN.
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'·DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016).
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT4
D No: 1KT4
··'"
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
.. iilll lilil .. -lliil . liiiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Retjuastor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:45
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual val\Je is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analy'zed for but not detected. the number ls the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and rean81ysls is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlorda·ne OOnslituents 2.constiluents or metabolites of technlcal chlordane Page 1 of 1
'" .......
__ v,_....v,._,,",_,,.,,_,,~ la] .,,-:· lllii> A " ..mo N .-ilEsolllilli ENW. .. liiil
Sample 525 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090 ·
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facilily: FCX, Inc. (Slalesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville,. NC
Id/Station: FCSMW6D I
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
0.027 J
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.025 J
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.027 J
0.055 J
0.020 U
0.059 J
0.020 U
0.054 J
0.020 U
0.048 J
0.24 J
0.020 U
0.020 U
0,010 U
0.0085 JN
1.0 U
0.20 U
0.40 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG./L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 ·
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE·
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT5
D No:1KT5
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
Produced by: Messer, Edw~rd
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 13: 15
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-est!rri·-~~1-t:i~e:,.,~.-presumptive evidence ~f presence of material. K-actual value is known to be less than value.given. L-actufl"t"Vai-~e··1s·1<nown to.be greater than value given. U-materlal was analYzed for but not detected. the niimber Is the minimum quantltation limit. R-qc Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampHng and reanalysls.ls·necessary for verification. C•confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see chlordane.const\tuerts 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1 . ~-\"_-. ;-.·. . .
Sample 526 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090: -:·· .. , : ,;
PESTICIDES SCAN :·:· ,.. ...
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Staies~ili~iNc . •
Case No: 31075
: MD,No:-1 KT6 Id/Station: FCXW25S /
Media: GROUNDWATER ': D'No: ·1 KT6
RESULTS
0.010 U
0.034 NJ
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.032 J
0.010 U
0.020 U
0.067 J
0.020 U
0.066 J
0.020 U
0.068 J
0.020 U
0.10 U
0.063 U
0.065 J
0.034 J
0.034 J
1.0 U
0.20 U
0.40 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) .
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)·
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. ,
--.. -liiiil . iiiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Request or: !
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:00
· Ending:
K-actual value Is known to be less than .value given. L-actual .value-ls known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was anafyzed ·for but not detected. the number Is the mlni_mum quantitatlon limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusc!-ble. compound ma}' or may not b~ p_resent. _resampllng and reanalysis. is necess~ry for verification. ·
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see t:hlorda·ne·.cor"!stltuents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1 .;.•.-, .. -. .. ·-;f/" ·'
I Sample 527 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
StatesviUe,. NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT7
D_.l'{o: 1KT7
Id/Station: FCXMW6S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
0.033
0.035 N
0.018
0.030
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.0029 JN
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.10 U
0.038
0.020 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
1.0 U
0.20 U
0.40 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC .
BETA·BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'·DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'·DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) :: ,.;_ ',:>
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) c:j.;,t:c{.;'.-.; ,
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242). · ·: ·,' .
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) ._. .,.
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
· PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)'
lnorg Contractor: LIBATY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
iillil -1iiii1 11111 liillll iiiil · iiiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requ0stoc
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 13:05
Ending:
A-}erage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated yalue. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ,_ ·.
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anal}'zed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-q'c indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be p~~sent. .r!3Sampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. ·
C-Confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see ch1ordane_C~nStituents 2:constituents or metabolites of techr:iical c~lordane Page 1 of 1 .. '
Sample 529 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF .
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: FCXEB 't
Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
0.010 UJ UG/L ALPHA-BHC
0.010 UJ UG/L BETA-BHC
0.011 UJ UG/L DELTA-BHC
0.010 UJ UG/L GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
0.010 UJ UG/L HEPTACHLOR
0.010 UJ UG/L ALDRIN
0.010 UJ UG/L HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
0.010 UJ UG/L ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
0.010 UJ UG/L DIELDRIN
0.020 UJ UG/L 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
0.020 UJ UG/L ENDRIN
0.020 UJ UG/L ENDOSULFAN 11 (BET A)
0.020 UJ UG/L 4,4'-DDD (P,P'·DDD)
0.020 UJ UG/L ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
0.020 UJ UG/L 4,4'•DDT (P ,P'-DDT)
0.10 UJ UG/L METHOXYCHLOR
0.020 UJ UG/L ENDRIN KETONE
0.020 UJ UG/L ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
0.010 UJ UG/L ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
0.010 UJ UG/L GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
1.0 UJ UG/L TOXAPHENE
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
0.40 UJ UG/L PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1246 (AROCLOR 1246)
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW1
DNo: 1KW1
lnorg Contractor: UBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumpti\/e evidence of presence of material.
--iiiil iiiil iiiil . liiiil Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 .14:45
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material wBs anafYzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be pi-esent. resamPling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. · C-confinned by gems: 1.when no vali.Je Is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabo1it~s of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1 . ·: . -.
Sample 530 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Slatesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: FCXOFB /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.013
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.10 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
1.0 U
0.20 U
0.40 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW2
D.No: 1KW2
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmated value. :N:presumptive evidence of presence of material. \
--· -----Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward ·
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:20
Ending:
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was anafyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data untisable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
.. Sample 531 · FY 2003 Project: 03-0090 :, · · ··
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC.
Id/Station: FCXW24S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
0,014
0,012
0,010 U
0,010 U
0,010 U
0,010 U
0,010 U
0,010 U
0,020 U
0,020 U
0,020 U
0,020 U
0,020 U
0,020 U
0,020 U
0,10 U
0,020 U
0,020 U
0,010 U
0,010 U
LOU
0,20 U
0.40 U
0,20 U
0,20 U
0.20 U
0,20 U
0,20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA·BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN .
ENDOSULFAN II (BET A)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'·DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA·CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW3
D No: 1KW3
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
- - --..... Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Pmjecl Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 11 :30
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interterences. J-estimated.value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. ,
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L•actual Valu8~:is. knoYm to be greeter than value· giv8n. U-materlal was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not bE{p'reS·ent. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification. . · · , ••
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see chlorda~e-~onstituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page :1 of 1
.. Sample 532 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville-Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville: NC -·-C~;e No: 31075 ·
MD No: 1KW4
C>No: 1KW4
Id/Station: FCXMW7 I
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
O.Q18 UR UG/L
0.010 UR UG/L
0.010 UR UG/L
0.050 UR UG/L
0.021 UR UGIL
0.010 UR UG/L
0.010 UR UG/L
0.010 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.10 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.020 UR UG/L
0.010 UR UG/L
0.010 UR UG/L
1.0 UR UG/L
0.20 UR UG/L
0.40 UR UG/L
0.20 UR UG/L
0.20 UR UG/L
0.20 UR UG/L
0.20 UR UG/L
0.20 UR UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA·BHC
GAMMA·BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'·DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-000)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)'
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221): _
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) -
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248).
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
-----·-Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor: ,
Project Leader: KMALLARY,
.Beginning: 10/23/2002 1_5:15
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. \
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limlt.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compountj may or may not.be pr13sent. resampllng Bnd reanalysis is necessary for verification.
c·-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane.Constituents 2.cons:tituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1 . . .. :,:-·-;, .. -'~--. ; . . .
-Sample 534 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
! PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Stalesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
Id/Station: FCXMW4 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KS6
RESULTS UNITS. ANALYTE
0.010 UJ UG/L ALPHA-BHC
0.010 UJ UG/L BETA-BHC
0.010 UJ UG/L DELTA·BHC
0.010 UJ UG/L GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
0.010 UJ UG/L HEPTACHLOR
0.010 UJ UG/L ALDRIN
0.010 UJ UG/L HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
0.010 UJ UG/L ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
0.020 UJ UG/L DIELDRIN
0.020 UJ UG/L 4,4'-DDE (P ,P'·DDE)
0.020 UJ UG/L ENORIN
0.020 UJ UG/L ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
0.020 UJ UG/L 4,4'·000 (P,P'-000)
0.020 UJ UG/L ENOOSULFAN SULFATE
0.020 UJ UG/L 4,4'-DDT (P,P'·DDT)
0.10 UJ UG/L METHOXYCHLOA
0.020 UJ UG/L ENDRIN KETONE
0.020 UJ UG/L ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
0.010 UJ UG/L ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
• 0.010 UJ UG/L GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 :-~ : .
1.0 UJ UG/L TOXAPHENE
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
0.40 UJ UG/L PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB·1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) ;.:df/i;f~.--.• · 0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1248 (AROCLOA 1248) ·
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
0.20 UJ UG/L PCB-1260 (AAOCLOA 1260)
Org Contractor: SHEALY
--------Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Request or:
. · Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/22/2002 14:20
Ending:
··i
A-a~erage value. NA-not arialyzed. NAl-lnt8rferences. J-estimat~d value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. ·. .
K-aqtual value is kno~. to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-materia1 was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation llmll.
R-qd·indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. _
C•cqnfirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane_ constituents _2.constltuents or metabolites of technlcal c~_lordane . . Page 1 of 1
-Sample 535 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
Id/Station: FCXMW3 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KS7
RESULTS
3.9
4.3
2.0 U
10
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
20 U
7.3
4.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
200 U
40 U
80 U
40 U
40 U
40 U
40 U
40 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA·BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
~~ig~~~FAN I (ALPHA) . _; ;fret!:,
4,4'-DDE (P,P'·DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
Org Contractor: SHEALY
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presurnptive evidence of presence of material. ,
--------Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/22/2002 14:45
Ending:
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known.to be greater than value given. U-materlal was anal~zed for but not detected. the numb8r is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, sea chlordane COnstituents 2.constituents oi metabolites of technical ch!Ordane Page 1 of 1
Sample 536 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090.
PESTICIDES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: FCXINFLU /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
0.41
0.50
0.010 U
0.079
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.046
0.020 U
0.0060 JN
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.10 U
0.13 J
0.020 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
1.0 U
0.20 U
0.40 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA·BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BET A)
4,4'-DDD (P ,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
· PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) .
Case No: 31075
D No: 1KT9 Org Contractor: SHEALY
-------Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward ·
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 15:30
Ending:
; '.
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmat8d value: N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. \
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. ·
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value Is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1 ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
. MEMORANDUM
Date: 11/27/2002
,. !
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
. )\.'.,subject: Results of EXTRACT ABLES Sample Analysis lilf)if 03-0090.. . FCX, Inc, (StatesvjllePlanif1>
: \: ,_.:·,: · Statesville, NC ·
,:,\ · From: Messer, Edward
To: Mallary, Ken I
I
I
CC: Joe Ferentz
RACS/W
Thru: QA Office
. Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have any I questions, please contact me. ·
I
I
I
I
I
I I ATTACHMENT
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number:
Site ID.
Affected
Samples
Volatiles
517,519,520,
: 521, 522, 523,
524, 525, 526,
. ;521, 528, 529,
530, 531, 533,
· :· 536,537
31075 Project Number 03-0090q -----
FCX-Statesville Plant, Statesville, NC
Compound or Fraction
1, l ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, carbon
tetrachloride .
517,519, 520, methyl acetate
521,522,523,
524, 525, 526,
527, 528, 529,
530, 531, 533,
:536,537
517
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526,527
528
529
I
530
I, 1-dichloroethene
tetrachloroethene
toluene, tetrachloroethene
carbon tetrachloride
chloroform; 1,2-dichlbroethane, toluene,
1,4-dichlorobenzene
carbon disulfide, 1, 1, I-trichloroethane, carbon
tetrachloride
carbon disulfide, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, 1, 1, !-
trichloroethane,. carbon .tetrachloride, 1,2-
dichloroethane
1, l ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, carbon
disulfide, toluene
tetrachloroethene
bromodichloromethane, tetrachloroethene
toluene, tetrachloroethene
toluene
SOW Number
Date
OLC03.2
11/20/02
Flag
Used Reason
J erratic continuing
calibration response
R
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
. ··•::·,
very lowiriitial and
continuing
calibration response
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quarititation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Case Number:
Site ID.
Affected
Samples
531
532
533
536
537
Extractables
517
517,519,520
519,520
521
522
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
. 31075 Project Number 03-0090q SOW Number OLC03.2
FCX-Statesville Plant, Statesville, NC Date 11/20/02
Flag
Compound or Fraction Used Reason
trans-1,2-dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloropropane J < quantitation limit
tetrachloroethene J < quantitation limit
tolutlne;0tetrachloroethene J < q_p,antitation limit ,,., . .-.,.,
·~ 4i[ifutitation limit 1;1 ,2;.'tric:hlcirci:'J,2,2;trifl110roethane, J
trans~l,2-dichli>roethene, carbon tetrachloride,
1,2-dichloroetb.ane ·
trichlorofluoromethane, chloroform, carbon J < quantitation limit
tetrachloride
hexachlorobenzene, atrazine, phenanthrene, J low DMC recovery ,j
anthracene
benzo(b )fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, R extremely low DMC
benzo( a)pyrene, indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene, recovery ·
dibenzo( a,h)anthracene, benzo (g,h,i) perylene
phenol J < quantitation limit
caprolactam, 1, 1 '-biphenyl, dimethylphthalate, J low DMC recovery
.. diethylphthalate, 4;6-dinitro~2-methylphenol,
hexachlorobenzene, atrazine, phenanthrene,
anthrac~ne, cli-n-butylphthalate,
.butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
di-n-pctylphthalate, benzo(b )fluoranthene,
benzCl(k)fluoranthene, benzo( a)pyrene,
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene, .
dibenzci(a,h)anthracene, benzo (g,h,i) perylene
caprolactam, 1, 1 '-biphenyl, dimethylphthalate, J low DMC recovery
diethylphthalate,·di-n-butylphthalate,
butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
di-n-octylphthalate
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Case Number:
Site ID.
Affected
Samples
523
524,525 •
526,527
529,530
531
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
31075 Project Number 03-0090q SOW Number OLC03.2 -----
FCX-Statesville Plant, Statesville, NC Date 11/20/02
Flag
Compound or Fraction Used Reason
naphthalene, caprolactam, 2-methylnaphthalene, J
1, 1 '-biphenyl, 2-chloronaphthalene,
dimethylphthalate, acenaphthylene,
acenaphth!/lle, dibenzofuran, diethylphth,alate, .
fluorene, 4:<:hlorophenyl-phenyl ether, 4,6-
dinitro-2-methylphenol, 4-bromophenyl-phenyl· ..
. ether, di-n-butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate;.
bis{2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
· caprolactam, 1,1'-biphenyl, dimethylphthalate, ·•· J
diethylphthalate, 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, di-
n-butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, J
benzo(b )fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo( a)pyrene, indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene,
dibenzo( a,h)anthracene, benzo (g,h,i) perylene
naphthalene, caprolactam, 2-methylnaphthalene, J
I, l '-biphenyl, 2-chloronaphthalene,
dimethylphthalate, acenaphthylene,
acenaphthene, dibenzofuran, diethylphthalate, ·.
fluorene, 4-chlorophenyl-phenyl ether, 4,6-·
dinitro-2-methylphenol, 4-bromophenyl-phenyl ·
ether, di-n-butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate,
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
naphthalene, caprolactam, 2-methylnaphthalene, J
I; 1 '-biphenyl, 2-chloronaphthalene,
dirnethylphthalate, acenaphthylene,
acenaphthene, dibenzofuran, diethylphthalate,
fluorene, 4-chlorophenyl-phenyl ether, 4,6-
dinitro-2-methylphenol, 4-bromophenyl-phenyl
ether, di-n-butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate,
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate,
benzo(b )fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo( a)pyrene, indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene,
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, benzo (g,h,i) perylene
low DMC recovery
low DMC recovery
low DMC recovery
low DMC recovery
low DMC recovery
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
· Case Number:
Site ID.
Affected
Samples
532
Pesticides
517
519
520
52l
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
31075 Project Number 03,0090q -----
FCX-Statesville Plant, Statesville, NC
Compound or Fraction
benzo(b )fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo( a )pyrene; indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene,
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, benzo (g,h,i) perylene
naphthalene, cakrolactam, 2,methy!J:ia~htlial~~' 1; l '-biphenyl, 2~chloronaphthalene; ... , ' :'·: f~ :
.. dimethylphthalate, acenaphthylene, ·. . . ·.
acenaphthene, dibenzofurai:J., diethylphthalate; ·
fluorene, 4-chlorophenyl-phenyl ether, 4,6-
dinitro-2-methylphenol, 4-bromophenyl-phenyl
ether, hexachlorobenzene, atrazine,
phenanthrene, anthracene, di-n-butylphthalate,
butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
di-n-octylphthalate
all
gamma-chlordane
all
all
alpha-BHC, gamma-BHC
4,4'-DDE, methoxychlor
.SOW Number
Date
OLC03.2
11/20/02
Flag
Used Reason
R extremely low DMC
recovery
. F · . _low DMC recovery
J low surrogate
recovery
JN < quantitation limit,
difference between
R
J
C
J
· GC columns
extremely low
surrogate recovery
(< 10%)
low surrogate .
recovery
confirmed by GC/MS
< quantitation limit
I
I
I
I
I
I
1+1:· ::-<':'; • .. · I<
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Case Number:
Site ID.
Affected
Samples
522
523
524
525
-520
526
527
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
31075 Project Number 03-0090q -----
FCX-Statesville Plant, Statesville, NC
Compound or Fraction
delta-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, heptachlor
epoxide, endosulfan I, dieldrin, 4,4'-DDE,
endrin, endosulfan II, 4,4'-DDD, endosulfan
sulfate, 4,4'-DDT, rn~thoxychlor,;endrinketone,
·. endrin aldehyde, alp6Ji:1chlord~~e;)oxaphene,
.aroclor-1016, aroc1or'.::i:i21, ar9clor-1232,
aroclor-1242, aroclor-1248, arodor~1254,
aroclor-1260
alpha-BHC, gamma-BHC
gamma-chlordane
heptachlor
endrin ketone
alpha-BHC, gamma-BHC, endosulfan I,
dieldrin, endrin, 4,4'-DDb, 4,4'-DDT,
rnethoxychlor, gamma~chlordane
gamma-chlordane
beta-BHC, heptachlo; epoxide, 4,4'-DDE,
endosulfan II, endosulfan sulfate, endrin ·
aldehyde, alpha-chlordane, gamma-chlordane
beta-BHC
beta-BHC, dieldrin
SOW Number OLC03.2
Flag
Used
R
Date 11/20/02
Reason
extremely low
. ·surrogate recovery
J over calibration range
JN < quantitation limit,
difference between
GC columns
JN < quantitation limit,
difference between
GC columns
JN
J
JN
J
< quantitation limit,
difference between
GC columns
. high surrogate ·
• recovery
< quantitation limit,
difference between ..
GC columns
high surrogate
recovery
JN < quantitation limit,
difference between
GC columns
JN < quantitation limit,
difference between
GC columns
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Case Number:
Site ID.
Affected
Samples
529
532
.. 534
536
/
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
31075 ----'---Project Number 03-0090q
FCX-Statesville Plant, Statesville, NC
Compound or Fraction
all
all
all
endrin .. c
endrin ketone
SOW Number OLC03.2
Flag
Used
J
R
Date ll /20/02
Reason
low surrogate
recovery
extremely low
surrog~te.recC>very
J low suijogate .
recovery·
JN < quantitation limit,
difference between
columns
J < quantitation limit
Sample 517 FY 2003 P reject: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLE$ SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT0 Id/Station: MW27S /
· Media:GROUNDWATER D No: 1KT0
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.0 U UG/L B ENZALDEHYDE
5.0 U UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2·CHLOROETHYL) ETHER.
5.0 U UG/L 2·CHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UGIL 2-METHYLPHENOL . ·, .. , ( ·'. -... : 5.0 U UG/L BIS(2·CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE
5.0 U UG/L (3•AND/OR 4·)METHYLPHENOL.
5.0 U UGIL N·NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
5.0 U UG/L NtTROBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 U UG/L 2-NITROPHENOL
5.0 U UGIL 2,4·DIMETHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 8IS(2·CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
5.0 U UG/L CAPROLACTAM
5.0 U UG/L 4•CHLOR0·3·METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2·METHYLNAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 2,4,S•TRICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 1,1·BIPHENYL
5.0 U UG/L 2·CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20 U UG/L 2-NITROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/L 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
5.0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
20 U UG/L 3-NITROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4·DINITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
.20 U
20 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
NA
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
iilll --.. -liiiil . liiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
· Beginning: 10/23/2002 09: 10
Ending:
UNITS ANALYTE
UG/L DIBENZOFURAN
UG/L 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L DI ETHYL PHTHALA TE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4-NITROANILINE
UG/L · 2:METHYL·4,6-DINITROPHENOL
UG/L N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L 1,2,4,5· TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L CARBAZOLE
UG/L DI-N·BUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORANTHENE
UG/L PYRENE
UG/L BEN2YLBUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L 3,3'·DICHLOROBENZIDINE
UG/L BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
UG/L CHRYSENE
UG/L BIS(2·ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
UG/L Dl•N•OCTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO·A-PYRENE
UG/L INDENO (1,2,3·CD) PYRENE
UG/L DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAHnterferences. J-estlmated varUe. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value ls known to be less than valu~ given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given, U:material was ana1yZed for but not detected. the numb~r i_s the minimum quantitation ljmit. R-qc indical4:!s that data unusable. Compound may or may nol be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. ·
Pacte 1 of 1
.. Sample 519 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KS8 Id/Station: FCXMW8 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KS8
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.0 U UG/L BENZALDEHYDE
0.64 J UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER ·
5.0 U UG/L 2-CHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2·CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE
5.0 U UG/L (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL '
5.0 U UG/L N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE, ·
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE .· "'.
5.0 U UG/L NITROBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 U UG/L 2-NITROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2·CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
5.0 U UG/L CAPROLACTAM
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLORO·3'METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 1, 1-BIPHENYL
5.0 U UG/L 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20 U UG/L 2-NITROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/L 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
5.0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
20 U UG/L 3-NITROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
20 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U ·
·5.0 u
5.0 U
NA
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
-----•liiiil · Production Date: 11127/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:35
Ending:
UNITS ANALYTE
UG/L DIBENZOFURAN
UG/L 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L DIETHYL PHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4-NITROANILINE
UG/L 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
UG/L N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L 1 ,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) .
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L · PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L CARBAZOLE
UG/L Dl·N•BUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORANTHENE
UG/L PYRENE
UG/L BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
UG/L BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
UG/L CHRYSENE
UG/L BIS(2·ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
UG/L DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
UG/L BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO-A-PYRENE
UG/L INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
UG/L DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(Gtjl)PERYLENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferenc8s. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-materlat was analy'zed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation llmit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling·and reanalysis is necessary for verification. · •
· · · " · · Page 1 of 1
Sample 519 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090 •
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
StatesiiiU<l, NC .
. Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KS8 Id/Station: FCXMWS /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KS8
RESULTS UNITS
4.3 NJ UG/L
2.7 NJ UG/L
4.2 NJ UG/L
5.3 NJ UG/L
6.4 NJ UG/L
ANALYTE
OCTANOIC ACID
DODECANAMIDE,N,N•BIS (2-HYDA
TETRADECANOIC ACID .
DODECANOIC ACID, (2,2-DIMETH
HEXANEDIOIC ACID, BIS (2-ETHY
DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NO'LVERIFIED
. -rtt·1iJ:!~t'---: -.: __ ,
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
-·--ai).liiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:35
Ending:·
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-eStlm8f8cfV8.IU_e: · N-Presumptlve evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actu0,1 valu8 . .is known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was anatyzed for but nOt detected. the number Is the minimum quantitatlon limil R-qc indicates th8.t data unusable. compound may or m·ay ntit.be Present. resampling and·reanalysis is necessary for verification. . . • • · ,. ·: · · · · · Pa!!e 1 of 1
Sample 520 FY 2003 . Project: 03-0090. •
EXTRACTABLE$ SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville'iNC
Case No: 31075 : MD .No: 1 KS9 Id/Station: FCXDUP1 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KS9
RESULTS
5.0 U
0.59 J
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
5.0 U
20 U
20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BI5(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BI5(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODl•N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2·CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM _ ..•.. • ..
4-CHLOR0·3·METHYLPHENOL / ;:· .
· 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE. . -.'. • . ·.
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) ·
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL . .
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1,1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
20 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
NA
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
. 5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
-iiiiil lliil -liiil . liiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requeslor:
· : Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:4·5
Ending: ·
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L ·
UG/L .
UGIL_.
UG/L-..
UG/L
UG/L•
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE .
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
ATRAZINE .
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
Dl·N·BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
." BIS(2·ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
Dl•N'OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interf8rences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of materlal. 1
K-actual value Is known to be less than .value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-materia1 was an8.1Yzed for but not detecte_d. the n1_Jp,ber Is the minimum quanUtation limit.
R-qc indicates that dala unusable. compound may or may not be present._. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. !
· Pace 1 of 1
liliiliilil3niiit ABMll!;A~ AN.R1s -
I Sample 520 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
• MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF ·
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: FCXDUP1 /
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KS9
Media: GROUNDWATER D No:_1KS9
RESULTS UNITS
2.9 NJ UG/L
2.3 NJ UG/L
ANALYTE
TETRADECANOIC ACID
HEXANEDIOtC ACID, BIS (2-ETHY .'
DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
liilll 'llliilil llilll -iiiiil iiiiil . iiiiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Request or:
Project Leader: KMALLARY. ·
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:45
Ending: · ·
A-ayerage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estirnated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-acpual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analy'zed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
··R-q9 indicates that data unusB.bie·. compound may or may not be pr~sent. re~ampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
i · Paae 1 of 1
~xn;;;J AB~AMM! ANftts iiiill
Sample 521 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
j
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Slalesville Plant)
Program: SF · .
Id/Station: FCSMW5S /
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT1
1 Media:GROUNDWATER D No: 1KT1
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
20 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
5.0 U
20 U
20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
8I5(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER ·
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2·METHYLPHENOL ., .. .c, :
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ~!;l.!;f\;\
ACETOPHENONE ,-~·'f·'>:,,-.-
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL ,
N·NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE .
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTAOIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4·CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOl
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
' 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
20 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
NA
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ-
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
.iiiiil --liiill iiiil . iiiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor;
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 10:25
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
· 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE' .
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
1,2,4;5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
0I-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE·
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2·ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
0I-N'.OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterterences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ,
K-actual· value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than_ ~alue given. U-materlal was analyZed for but not dete~te'I, the number is the,nilnlmum quantitation limit.
R-qc _indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. . resampling and reanalysis is _[lecessary for verification. .
· Paae 1 of 1
l!!!!l& 11 .! i2 •.. Jd:IIIIAM~N.tiill!ls liiliil • ·:--: l; .
Sample 521 FY 2003 Project 03-0090
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Staiesviile Plant)
Program: SF
Slatesville, NC
Id/Station: FCSMW5S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
2.7 NJ UG/L
5.4 NJ UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA BHC
GAMMA-BHC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT1
D No: 1KT1
DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NiJT;VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: UBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
-.. .. -liiiil . liiiil · Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward ·
Requester:
. Projecl Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 10:25
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analy;ed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-Pres~mptive evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value is known to be Jess than value given. L-actual value Is known totu~ greater than value given. U-material was analyZed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantltation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable: compound may oi-may not b8 Present. reSclmpling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification. · · Paoe 1 of 1
-Sample 522 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT2 Id/Station: FCSMW5D /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KT2
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5,0 U UG/L BENZALDEHYDE
5.0 U UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2·CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
5,0 U UG/L 2-CHLOROPHENOL
5,0 U UG/L 2-METHYLPHENOL
5,0 U UG/L BIS(2·CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER. 5,0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE
5.0 U UG/L (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
5.0 U UG/L NITROBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 U UG/L 2-NITROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2·CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE'-·• 5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL -i),<,bJ,/.,:
5.0 U UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
5.0 UJ UG/L CAPROLACTAM
5,0 U UG/L 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL.
5,0 U UG/L 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
5,0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE_(HCCP)
5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 2 ,4 ,5-TRICHLOROPH ENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L 1,1-BIPHENYL
5,0 U UG/L 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20 U UG/L 2-NITROANILINE
5.0 UJ UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/L 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
5,0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
20 U UG/L 3-NITROANILINE
5,0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: UBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
20 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
NA
5.0 UJ
5,0 U
5,0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
59 J
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5,0 U
5,0 U
5,0 U
-liilll ' iiiil liiil liiil . iiiil Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
· · Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 10:30
Ending:
UNITS ANALYTE
UG/L DIBENZOFURAN
UG/L 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L DIETHYL PHTHALA TE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4-NITROANILINE
UG/L 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
UG/L N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L ·PHENANTHRENE·
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L CARBAZOLE .·
UG/L· 01-N-BUTYL.PHTHALATE .
UG/L FLUORANTHENE . .
UG/L. PYRENE
UG/L BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
UG/L BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
UG/L CHRYSENE
UG/L BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
UG/L D1-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO·A-PYRENE
UG/L INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
UG/L DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimaiBd .~alue. N-presumpUve evidence of-presence of material. ,_ K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual v8.1u8_.1S.known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyi:ed for b_ut not detected. th'e number Is the minimum quantitatlon llmit. R-qc indicates tFlat data unusable. compound may or may not be Present. resampling and rean81ysis is necessary for verification. · · · :-; • · '. , . . · · · Paae 1 of 1
-Sample 522 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCSMWSD I
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
Statesville,'NC · ·., .
Cas~ No: 31075
MD No: 1KT2
D No: .1KT2 . _, .-: ,,-..
RESULTS UNITS
3.2 NJ UG/L
55 NJ UG/L
DODECANAMIDE, N,N-BIS (2-HYDR
4,4'=BUTYLIDENEBIS-6-T-BUTYL-M-TRES01
DAf A REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB. IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
---Iii) -" iiiiil Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY :
. Beginning: 10/23/2002 10:30
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. _
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-matertal was analy'zed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
R-qc Indicates that data unusBblei. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verificatio_n.
Paae 1 of 1
Sample 523 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MDNci: 1KT3 Id/Station: FCSW29I /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KT3
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.0 U UG/L BENZALDEHYDE
5.0 U UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BI5(2,CHLOROETHYL) ETHER .
5.0 U UG/L 2-CHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BI5(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE
5.0 U UG/L (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L N-NITROSODl•N-PROPYLAMINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
5.0 U UG/L NITROBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 U UG./L 2-NITROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 8I5(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
5.0 UJ UG/L CAPROLACTAM
5.0 U UG/L 4·CHLOR0·3·METHYLPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L 1, 1-BIPHENYL
5.0 UJ UG/L 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20 U UG/L 2-NITROANILINE
5.0 UJ UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/L 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
5.0 UJ UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
• 20 U UG/L 3-NITROANILINE
5.0 UJ UG/L ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
20 U
20 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
NA
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5,0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
-lllil liiiiiil liiiiiil liiii1 . iiiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 .11 :00
Ending:·
UNITS ANALYTE
UG/L DIBENZOFURAN
UG/L . 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L DI ETHYL ['HTHALA TE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4-NITROANIUNE
UG/L 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
UG/L N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L 1,2.4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXAGHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L ,CARBAZOLE
UG/L DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
UG/L FLUORANTHENE
UG/L PYRENE
UG/L BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
UG/L 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
UG/L · BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
UG/L CHRYSENE
UG/L 8I5(2-ETHYLHEXYL).PHTHALATE
UG/L DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L ·BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO-A-PYRENE· .
UG/L INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
UG/L DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterlerences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ·, -·
K~abtual value is kno'("n to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analYzed for but not detectet;j. the number Is the minimum qu_a,:ititation limit.
R~c indicates that dat8 unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
I · · Paqe 1 of 1
....
.. ------liiiiil --ePA ~GION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA ----iiiil liiiliJ Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Sample 524 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLE$ SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No:'1KT4
DNo: 1KT4
ld/Stalion:FCXDUP2 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.0 U UG/L BENZALDEHYDE
5.0 U UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BI5(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L 2-CHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BI5(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) l=THER .
5.0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE : . ,. ,.·.
5.0 U UG/L (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOtii},_;(
5.0 U UG/L N-NITROSODl•N·PROPYLAMINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
5.0 U UG/L NITROBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 U UG/L 2-NITROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BI5(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U · UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
5.0 UJ UG/L CAPROLACTAM
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 2 ,4 ,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L 1,1-BIPHENYL
5.0 U UG/L 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20 U UG/L 2-NITROANILINE
5.0 UJ UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/L 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
5.0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
20 U UG/l 3-NITROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L. ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
20 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
NA
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Request or:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 09:45
Ending:
UNITS ANALYTE
UG/L DIBENZOFURAN
UG/L 2,4-DINITROTOLUEt'!E
UG/L DIETHYL PHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L · 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4-NITROANILINE .
UG/L. 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
UG/L N:NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4-BROMOPHENYL:PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L CARBAZOLE
UG/L DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORANTHENE
UG/L PYRENE
UG/L BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
UG/L BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
UG/L CHRYSENE.
UG/L BI5(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
UG/L DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L · BENZO-A-PYRENE
UG/L INDENO (1,2,3-CD) flYRENE
UG/L DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(GHl)PERYLiNE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. \ K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit. R-qc indicates that data unusab~. compound may or may not be Present. resampling 8.nd"r8ana1ysls is necessary for verification. · · Page 1 of 1
-""'-., ,.-. ::,AA--b A1llllhm;Wl llllil illlJ:PAlillllc:,10"'1st:sb, iirHE!itPbA liiiil lliil iiiil ---. iiiil . Proauction Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Sample 525 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090'
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX; Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT5 Id/Station: FCSMW6D /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 1KT5
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.0 U UG/L BENZALDEHYDE
5.0 U UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L 2-CHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE
5.0 U UG/L (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L N-NITROSODl•N-PROPYLAMINE.
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
5.0 U UG/L NITROBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 u UG/L 2-NITROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL . ': 5.0 U UG/L BtS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE' ,
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUT ADtENE
5.0 UJ UG/L CAPROLACTAM
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L 1,1-BIPHENYL
5.0 U UG/L 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20 U UG/L 2-NITROANILINE
5.0 UJ UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/L 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
5.0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
20 U UG/L 3-NITROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
20 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
. 5.0 U
NA
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 J
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0.U
5.0 U
5.0 U
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlm8.'i8d value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Messer, Edward
RequestOr:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 13:15
Ending:
UNITS ANALYTE
UG/L DIBENZOFURAN
UG/L 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L DIETHYL. PHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4-NITROANILINE
UG/L 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
UG/L N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L. CARBAZOLE
UG/L DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORANTHENE
UG/L PYRENE
UG/L BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
UG/L BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
UG/L CHRYSENE
UG/L BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
UG/L DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO·A-PYRENE
UG/L INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
UG/L DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was ana1yzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitatfon limit. R-qc indicates that data un~sable. compound may or may not be present. rEts"lrhpfing and reanalysis is necessary for verification. . .
. Page 1 of 1
Sample 525 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090.
MISCELLANEOUS. COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCSMW6D I
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
2.7 NJ UG/L
ANALYTE
1-DOCOSENE
Statesville, NC
Case Nci: 31075
MD No: 1KT5
D No: 1KT5
DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
... ,.,
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
liiil . liiil i -liliil liiil . aiiil · Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
ReQuestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 13:15
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not ·analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual· va_tue ls-known to be g"reater. than value given. U-materlal was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantltatlon limit. R-qc Indicates that data unusable. compouAd may or may "C?ttjef_qr~.~e.n~: r~sampllng·'ari'd reanalysis Is necessary for Verification. ·· . · _.: · ·: · ' ·--, ''· Pace 1 of 1
lllil
Sample 526 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
State_s~iU~. ,NC:: S ·•· · .
>ca{eliio: 31075····
·MD No: 1KT6 Id/Station: FCXW25S /
Media: GROUNDWATER D Nci: 1 KT6
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.0 U UG/L BENZALDEHYDE
5.0 U UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BI5(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L 2-CHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BI5(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE
5.0 U UG/L (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE.
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
5.0 U UG/L NITROBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 U UG/L 2-NITROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L B15(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROANIUNE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
5.0 U UG/L CAPROLACTAM .
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL ·
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE: , ... · .. 5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCc'P)
5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL :'. . . .
20 U UG/L 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 1, 1-BIPHENYL
5.0 U UG/L 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20 U UG/L 2-NITROANIUNE
5.0 U UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/L 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
5.0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
20 U UG/L 3-NITROANIUNE
5.0 U UG/L. ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4-0INITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
20 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
NA
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
-iiiiil --iiiil . iiiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requestor: :.
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:00
Ending:.
UNITS ANALYTE
UG/L DIBENZOFURAN
UG/L 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L DIETHYL PHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4-NITROANILINE
UG/L 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
UG/L N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMI_NE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L CARBAZOLE
UG/L DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORANTHENE
UG/L PYRENE
UG/L BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L 3,3':DICHLOROBEN?IDINE
UG/L _BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
UG/L CHRYSENE
UG/L BI5(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
UG/L 0I-N-OCTYLP HTHALA TE
UG/L BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L. BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO-A-PYRENE ·
UG/L INDENO (1_,2,3'CD)' PYRENE
UG/L DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlrri8~ed value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material. , K-actual value Is known to b8 less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anS!yzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be pre~ent. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verificatlo~. ·
Paae 1 ol 1
--,_,., .. ,,,.clllJ::;AiaJ: ArllllfslS -
Sample 527 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLE$ SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Stalesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT7 Id/Station: FCXMW6S /
Media: GROUNDWATER . D No: 1KT7
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.0 U UG/L BENZALDEHYDE
5.0 U UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 8IS(2·CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
5.0 U UGIL 2·CHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UGIL 2•METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2·CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER .
5.0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE
5.0 U UG/L (3·AND/OR 4·)METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L N-NITROSODl•N•PROPYLAMINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
5.0 U UG/L NITROBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 U UG/L 2-NITROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2,4·DIMETHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 8IS(2·CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
5.0 U UG/L CAPROLACTAM
5.0 U UG/L 4•CHLOR0-3·METHYLPHENOL • ·.
5.0 U UG/L 2·METHYLNAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6·TRICHLOROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 2,4,S·TRICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 1,1-BIPHENYL
5.0 U UGIL 2·CHLORONAPHTHALENE -·
20 U UG/L 2-NITROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/1. 2,6·DINITROTOLUENE
5.0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
20 U UG/L 3•NITROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U ·
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
20 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
NA
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
----liliil . iiiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 13:05
Ending:
UNITS ANALYTE • i
UG/L DIBENZOFURAN
UG/L 2,4•DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L DI ETHYL PHTHALA TE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4•NITROANILINE
UG/L 2·METHYL·4,6•DINITROPHENOL
UG/L N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L 1,2,4,S·TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L PHENANTHRENE .
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L CARBAZOLE
UG/L Dl•N•BUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORANTHENE
UG/L PYRENE
UG/L BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L 3,3'·DICHLOROBENZIDINE
UG/L BENZO(A)ANTHRAC_ENE
UG/L CHRYSENE
UG/L BIS(2·ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
UG/L Dl•N•OCTYLPHTHALA TE
UG/L BENZO(B)f'LUOf!AJ,{rHENE
UG/L BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO·A·PYRENE •! . ·
UG/L · IN DENO (1 ;2,3-_CD) P,YRENE
UG/L DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
A-average vatue. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ,
K-actual value is known to· be less than value given. L-actual value ls known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-<tc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis Is necessary for veriflcatior1. . I ~ge,~,
I
I -iiiil .. lilil ----·---EPA-REGION IVSESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42 Sample. 527 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
MISCELLANEOus·coMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF ·I Id/Station: FCXMW6S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
Slatesvil/e, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KT7
D No: 1KT7
RESULTS UNITS
2.6 NJ UG/L
2.0 NJ UG/L
DODECANOIC ACID 4,4'-BUTYLIDENERIS-6-T-RUTYL·M-C(lESOL
DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOf'VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ,
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 13:05
Ending:
K-ectual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc Indicates that data unusable. -compound may or may not ~e present. resalnpling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 529 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF -
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW1
DNo: 1KW1
Id/Station: FCXEB /
Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.0 U UG/L BENZALDEHYDE
5.0 U UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) IITHER
5.0 U UGIL 2-CHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2·METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2·CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE
5.0 U UG/L (3-AND/OR 4·)METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L N•NITROSOD/-N-PROPYLAMINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
5.0 U UG/L NITROBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 U UG/L 2-NITROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROAN/LINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
5.0 UJ UG/L CAPROLACTAM
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL·
5.0 UJ UG/L 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L 1, 1-B/PHENYL
5.0 UJ UG/L 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20 U UG/L 2-NITROANILINE
5.0 UJ UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/L 2,6-D/N/TROTOLUENE
5.D UJ UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
20 U UG/L 3-NITROANILINE
5.0-UJ UG/L ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL.
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
20 U
20 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 (J
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
NA
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
liiiil iiiil . --lilil . iii) · Pfoauctlon Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
RequeStor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:45
Ending:
UNITS ANALYTE
UG/L DIBENZOFURAN
UG/L 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L DIETHYL PHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4-NITROANILINE
UG/L 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
UG/L N'NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L 1 ;2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L CARBAZOLE
UG/L DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORANTHENE
UG/L PYRENE
UG/L BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALA TE
UG/L 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
UG/L BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
UG/L CHRYSENE
UG/L BIS(2·ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
UG/L Dl·N•OCTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UGIL BENZO·A-PYRENE
UG/L INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
UGIL DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
!
A-average value. NA·not analyzed. NAl·lnterlerences. J•estl~:~tj ~atUe .. N·~presumpti\le evidence of presence of material. ,. . K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual vah.i8_ ls:known to be greater than value given. U-matertal was an_alyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates'that data unuSable. compound may or may noi b~_Present. ~esampting and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 530 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. {Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
· Case No: 3·1075
MDNo: 1KW2
DNp: 1KW2
Id/Station: FCXOFB /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.0 U UG/L BENZALDEHYDE
5.0 U UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L 2-CHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE
5.0 U UG/L (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE ·
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROETHANE
5.0 U UG/L NITROBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 U UG/L 2-NITROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHAN_E
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROANILINE . ,>;';-:.', ' .
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE·i}'f"/f'• -
5.0 UJ UG/L CAPROLACTAM
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL_.
5.0 UJ UG/L 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L 1,1-BIPHENYL
5.0 UJ UG/L 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20 U UG/L 2-NITROANILINE
5.0 UJ UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/L 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
5.0 UJ UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
20 U UG/L 3-NITROANILINE
5.0 UJ UG/L ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
20 U
20 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
NA
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 lJJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
-. --liiiiiil liiiiiil . iiiil .. · .. ·. Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Pro_duced by: Messer, Edward ·
ASquOstor:
Project Leader: K_MALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 14:20
Ending:
UNITS ANALYTE
UG/L DIBENZOFURAN
UG/L 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L DIETHYL PHTHALATE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4-NITROANILINE
UG/L 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
UG/L N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L · CARBAZOLE
UG/L. Dl•_N-BUTYLPHTHA1'ATE
UG/L FLUORANTHENE
UG/L PYRENE_' --. ,
·uG/L BENZYLBUl)'LPHTHALATE
.UG/L 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
UG/L BENZO(A)ANTHRAC_ENE
UG/L CHRYSENE
UG/L · BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
UG/L DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO-A-PYRENE
UG/L INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
UG/L DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-esti~~;ed: ~~1-ue. :·N-presu;;,ptive evidence of presence of material. ,
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value ls known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantltation limit.
R-qc Indicates that data unUs8.ble. compound may or rri~y no~ b_~ y_res_ent. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. ·
.. :-\/tti1ii.< .. ; Page 1 ol 1
iliilil:x I fillliJI-ABMlsA .. ANM!.1s lllil -Sample 531 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACTABLE$ SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville;NC
. q~~fNo: 31075
MD.No: 1KW3
D No: 1KW3
Id/Station: FCXW24S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 _UJ
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
20 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
20 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
20 U
5.0 UJ
20 U
20 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2·CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N•NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL ·0 •c-'
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE . ., .. · • · ..
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL ,·;;:f ·. . ..
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL.
1,1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
20 U
20 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
NA
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0UJ
5.0 UJ
·5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
iiil llllil -iiiil iiiil . liiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY,
Beginning: 10/23/2002 11 :30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
0IB ENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALA TE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER.
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE.
Dl'N-BUTYLPHTHALATE·
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CH RYS ENE .
BI5(2-ETHYLHEXYL) _PHTHALATE
0I-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
OIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
A•average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterlerences. J-estin_,ated,value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
K-actual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual v.ilue is.known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analYzed for but not detected: the_ number Is the minimum quantitatlon llmit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not-b&·pfesent. resampling and reanaly~is is necessary for v.erification ..
Page 1 of 1
lilili:x-rWrAEMlsAIRAt"'51slail lilll
Sample 531 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville; NC .
Id/Station: FCXW24S I
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
2.3 NJ UG/L
ANALYTE
DIISOBUTYL PHTHALATE
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW3
D No: 1KW3
DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
--liliil liliil iiiil . liiiil Production Date: 11/27/2002 14:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Raquestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 11 :30
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAHnterferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. 1 K-actuat value Is known to be tess than value given. l-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number ls the minimum quantltation limlt.
R-qr indicates that data unusable. compound. may or may not be p.resent. resampling and reanalysis iS necE!ssary for verification.
[ Paqe 1 of 1
Sample 532 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
EXTRACT ABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW4
D No: 1KW4
.
1
Id/Station: FCXMW7 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
, RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
5.0 U UG/L BENZALOEHYDE
5.0 U UG/L PHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2·CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
5.0 U UG/L 2·CHLOROPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2-METHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER .
5.0 U UG/L ACETOPHENONE
5.0 U UG/L (3-ANO/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOl
5.0 U UG/L N-NITROSDDI-N-PROPYLAMINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOAOETHANE
5.D U UG/L NITAOBENZENE
5.0 U UG/L ISOPHORONE
5.0 U UG/L 2-NITAOPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
5.0 U UG/L BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
5.0 U UG/L 2,4-DICHLOAOPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L NAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOROANILINE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
5.0 UJ UG/L CAPROLACTAM
5.0 U UG/L 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
5.0 U UG/L HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
5.0 U UG/L 2,4,6-TAICHLOROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 2,4,S•TAICHLOROPHENOL
5.0 UJ UG/L 1,1-BIPHENYL
5.0 UJ UG/L 2·CHLORONAPHTHALENE
20 U UG/L 2·NITAOANILINE
5.0 UJ UG/L DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
5.0 U UG/L 2,6·DINITROTOLUENE ·
5.0 UJ UG/L ACENAPHTHYLENE
20 U UG/L 3-NITROANILINE
5.0 UJ UG/L ACENAPHTHENE
20 U UG/L 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
20 U UG/L 4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
RESULTS
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
20 U
20 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
NA
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 U
5.0 UJ
5.0 UJ
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
5.0 UR
iiiiil iliiil -liliiil liilil iiil . liilil
Production Date: 11/27/200214:42
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 15:15
Ending:
UNITS ANALYTE
UG/L DIBENZOFUAAN
UG/L 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
UG/L DIETHYL f'HTHALATE
UG/L FLUORENE
UG/L 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L 4-NITAOANILINE
UG/L .. 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
UG/L. N-NITAOSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
UG/L ·1 ,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UG/L 4,BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
UG/L HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
UG/L ATRAZINE
UG/L PENTACHLOROPHENOL
UG/L PHENANTHRENE
UG/L ANTHRACENE
UG/L CARBAZOLE
UG/L DI-N·BUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L FLUOAANTHENE
UG/L PYRENE
UG/L BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
UG/L BENZO(A)ANTHAACENE
UG/L CHAYSENE
UG/L BIS(2·ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
UG/L DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
UG/L BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
UG/L BENZO·A-PYAENE
UG/L INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
UG/L DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
UG/L BENZO(GHl)PERYLE.NE
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estii"nated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ,
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual valu~ is known to be greater than value given. U-material was anal'yzed for but not detected.-the number Is the minimum quantitation llmit.
R-qc indicates thal data unus8.ble. compound may or ma·y not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
P~nP. 1 nf 1
Sample 532 FY 2003 Project: 03-0090
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: FCXMW7 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
10 NJ UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMACIL
Statesville, NC
Case No: 31075
MD No: 1KW4
D No: 1KW4
DATA REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED . -... ,.
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: SHEALY
Produced by: Messer, Edward
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 10/23/2002 15: 15
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. ,
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value. is known to b8 greater than value given. U-materlal was analy~ed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation liniit.
A-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not b8 pres·ent. r8s8.mpling and reanalysis is necessary for verification . . . ; .. Page 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX F
TREND ANALYSES CHARTS
NOR/C.\MyFiles\My Documents\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1\0930 Report Project Perf\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Reportl0ct2002. 3rd semi-annual rpt doc
liilil iiiiiil ---------. .. lliil iiil1 .. -liiliill liiil lliiiil iii!
Pesticide Trends in MW-3
30.00
25.00 · -q
'
\
20.00 ' -·I!! -Alpha-BHC ~ \ ~ I )I( Alpha-chlordane OJ) ::, ' ◊
~ 0 .. -0 .. Beta-BHC C: .9 ()
15.00 . Dieldrin ce '
~ ~ Gamma-BHC (Lindane) C: u
0)
0 Gamma-chlordane C: ◊
0 u 10.00 -·Iii-• · Heptachlor Epoxide --'v-
' ft,
' ,,, '
5.00 □. • ---------------. -. . .□ .. - - - - - - - -... -.. - - --. - -. _._._._-;,.,_. -. . □-..... -o· --.. ,,...:....-.-.---_--l:1 =
__..----+-...__ . • -Iii -.. -. .
0.00 -----:::.-~--.
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
0 0 0 0 0 ------N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ C: OJ) t, 0 .D ~ 3 OJ) t, 0 .D ~ C: OJ) ~ c.. ::, ::, 0) 0) c.. ::, 0) 0) c.. ::, 0
<t: 0 0 <!'. 0 ::, 0 -, <!'. µ.. -, <!'. 0 µ.. <!'. -, <t:
Sample Date
I Concentration (ug/L) I 0 ~ l;J -I>-V, °' __, 00 'O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Apr-00 Jun-00 I Aug-00 I Oct-00
Dec-00 I
Feb-01 I
Apr-01 I [fJ
"" Jun-0 J 3 -0 " 'O "' I ci"" ::::-.
0 Aug-OJ 0
0: "' " ~ (1) .., "' Oct-0 J ..., I (1) :::,
0. "' Dec-OJ s· s: I Feb-02 ::.::::
' V,
[fJ I Apr-02
Jun-02 I Aug-02
Oct-02 I
t + + I
Cl 0:, > "' (1) "O I 3 ~ "' ::,-3 ' "' 0:, ' "' ::r: 0:, ' 0:, n ::r: ::r: n I n
~ r s·
0. I §
(1)
~
I
lilll -.. --lilll ---iiiill iiiill iiill -liiill ---liiiil iiiil
4.50
4.00
3.50
~ 3.00
-l -on
::l ~ 2.50 C:
0
~ !:: ~ 2.00
u C: 0 u
0.00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ C: on -u ..0 ~ 0. u :, :::J 0) 0) 0. <( ~ <( 0 0 LL. <(
Pesticide Trends in MW-50
N 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ::: on -u ..0
:::J :::J u 0) 0)
~ <( 0 0 LL.
Sample Dates
N N 0 0 ' ' ~ § 0.
<( ~
N 0 ' on :::J
<(
N 0
' 0
0
---. Alpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
----Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Gamma-chlordane
- -l!!l!!!!!I a!! ll!!m == lllllil llliiil liiil iiiil --- - -.. lilll liliiiil iiiiil
Pesticides Trends in MW-6S
0.20
0.18
0.16
0.14
~ ....J ~ gJl 0.12
~ = 0 ·;:: 0.10 " ~ ~ = V u 0.08 = 0 u
0.06
0.04
0.02
~
\
\
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \ \ \i ____ --< --0-·----\L ~ \:. ---------------
-❖.-Alpha-BHC
---Beta-BHC
-o Dieldrin
---Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
----
0.00 0
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ = 00 ~ u ..0 ~ = 00 u u ..0 ~ = 00 u 0. :::, ::, u V V 0. ::, ::, "' '1) 0. :::, 0 0 ::, < ~ < 0 u. < ~ < 0 u. < ~ < 0
Sample Dates
I Concentrations (ug/L) m 0 0 '°' '°' 0 '°' '°' 0 0 0 0 0 --m 0 N .i,. °' 00 0 N Apr-00 Jun-00 D Aug-00 B
Oct-00 R
Dec-00
I Feb-0 I
Apr-0 I
-0
I
[./J " m "" ;!: 3 Jun-0 I o· -0 0: ~ " 0 --l I Aug-01 ~ "' " -::, " Cl. V,
V,
Oct-0 I 5
I s:
~ Dec-0 I ' °' 0 I Feb-02
Apr-02 I
Jun-02 I
Aug-02
I Oct-02
I
+ + I 0 ► n· -o -::,-=I-"' -· ' ::, IJ:I I :r:
(")
I
liiiiiii --iiiii iiiil -- --- ----lilil iiiil liill -iiiil iiiil
45.00
40.00
35.00
~ 30.00
...l -OJ) ::,
~ 25.00 C: 0
"' ... -20.00 C: G)
Q C: 0 u 15.00
10.00 ~ 5.00
=
0 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ... C: OJ) u Q .D ...
0. ::, ::, G) G) 0.
<( ._, <( 0 0 CI-<(
VOC Trends in MW-5O
~
N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' C: OJ) u Q .D ... C: ::, ::, G) 0) 0. ::, ._, <( 0 0 CI-<( ._,
Sample Dates
N 0 ' OJ) ::,
<(
N 0 ' u 0
I, 1-Dichloroethane
----I, 1-Dichloroethene
__._ Chloroform
--+-Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
Trichloroethene
---I!!!!!! ~ == liiiiil liiiiil iiiil -----.. iiiil iilil iial iial
VOC Trends in MW-60
70.00 ,----------------------------
~
2, 40.00 -j------------------------------1-----= 0 ·~
~ -8 30.00 -t--------------------------------1---__j = 0 u
0.00
0 0 ' ~ 0. <
0 0
0 0 ' ' = OJ)
::l ::l .... <
0 0
0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' -0 .D ~ 0 0. 0) 0) 0 < 0 "-
N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' = OJ) u 0 ~ OJ) .D = u ::l ::l 0) 0) 0. ::l 0 ::l .... < 0 "-< .... < 0
Sample Dates
.......,_ I, 1-Dichloroethene
-+--Chloroform
-D-Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
-&-Trichloroethene
-I!!!!!! !!!!I == ;a iiiiii liiiiilil iiiil --.. -.. --iiill liiil liiil liiiiil
YOC Trends in MW-I I
60.00 ,--------------------------------
50.00 -j-----t',------------------------------1
~ 40.00 I, 1-Dichloroethanc ,-..l -bJ) ----I, 1-Dichloroethene ::,
~
C: Bromodichloromethane 0 ·.= 30.00 -Chloroform "' ~ -C: -a-Chloromethane V u C: ---.-Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 0 u 2000 -a-Trichloroethene
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~,f \'°'« ~"'¢o o"'" <;>'Y «.;;;, ~~<: \'°'« ~"'¢o o"'" <;>"'c: «.qJ' ~~"' '>'°'«
Sample Dates
- --.. l!!!!ll!!!I e= liiil liiiiiil -liiill iii) iii)
VOC Trends in W-27
12.00
10.00
~ 8.00
t::::I OJ) ::,
~
C: 0 ·;::: 6.00 "' ~ 1--+-Tetrachloroethene (PCE) I -C:
(1) u C: 0
(J 4.00
2.00 /
v ~
0 00 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ C: OJ) -u ..0 ~ C: OJ) -u ..0 ~ C: OJ) -0. :::, :::, u (1) (1) 0. ::, ::, u (1) " 0. :::, :::, u -< ~ -< 0 0 u... -< ~ -< 0 0 u... -< ~ -< 0
Sample Dates
VOC Trends in W-29
60.00 -,--------------------------------
50.00 +-------------------------------___J
~ 40.00 -i----~'s----------------~------'.---~
....J
ob ::,
~
C:
0
.; 30.00 -i--------\-------------------------------'11
~ -C: "' u C: 0 u
10.00
0.00
•
t,
0 0 0 0 ' ' ~ C: 0. ::, < --.
~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' 01) t5 u .D ~
::, "' "' 0. 0 < a u... <
~= ===:$ 11
N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' C: 01) t5 u .D ~ C: 01) -::, ::, "' 0. u 0 <l) ::, ::, 0 --. < a u... < --. <
Sample Dates
--+--I, 1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
--Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
--tr-Trichloroethene
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
APPENDIXG
DEPTH TO WATER CHARTS
NOR/C:\MyFiles\My Doruments\Projects\20064-133 F C X\Option Year 1'D930 Report Projed Per1\3rd Semi-Annual Sampling Event Reportl0d2002-3rd semi-annual rpt doc
liiil liiiiil liiiiiil lilill iiiil -- - - -------.. liiiil iiiil
s
..e
Depth to Water
RW-1
May 2002 through October 2002
fr 30,00 +-----------------------------------------
0
0,00 +-----------------------------------------~
5/1/2002 6/1/2002 7/1/2002 8/1/2002 9/1/2002 I 0/1/2002 11/1/2002
Dates
liiiil liiil liiiii iiiil liilil ---------.. --liiil liiil
70.00
60.00
-
50.00
8
..c i5. 30.00 " Cl
20.00
10.00
0.00
5/1/2002
. -
6/1/2002
Depth to Water
RW-2
May 2002 through October 2002
---------.
I/
~
7/1/2002
~ a
8/1/2002
Dates
---~~
\
\
9/1/2002 10/1/2002 11/1/2002
--------liiill 11111 11111 -._ ---.J liii.i liiil liii.i
2
Depth to Water
RW-3
May 2002 through October 2002
70.00 -----------------------------------------
50.00 t-------'\l------7:--------:;;P::,s,.__====~==d-----'~-----'~----j
i 40.00
B
..c: o. 30.00 +-----------------------------------
" Cl
20.00 +---------------------------------------------'
10.00 +----------------------------------------
0.00 +,-------~------~------~-----~-------r ----
5/1/2002 6/1/2002 7/1/2002 8/1/2002 9/1/2002 10/1/2002 11/1/2002
Dates
liiiiil iiiiil iiiilil iiiiil iiiil ----.. ---liiillll --iiiil iiiil -
Depth to Water
RW-4
May 2002 through November 2002
0.00 +-------~-----~------~------~------~-~---~
5/1/2002 6/1/2002 7/1/2002 8/1/2002 9/1/2002 10/1/2002 11/1/2002
Dates
iiiiil iiiil ---.. ------...... --iiiial. iiiial
70.00
60.00
50.00
8
--" 15. 30.00 " Cl
20.00
10.00
0.00
5/1/2002
. . " . \
6/1/2002
Depth to Water
RW-5
May 2002 through November 2002
. r
\ I . ~
7/1/2002
.
•
'
8/1/2002
Dates
.
. . -. \
\
9/1/2002 10/1/2002 11/1/2002
--I!!!!!!!! 1!!!11 =:i liiiiii iiiil -iiiil ----.. -1111 liilll iiiiil iiiil
~ "" ~
~ " cl
Depth to Water
RW-6
May 2002 through October 2002
:3: 30.00 +--------------------------------------------1 s -s a. " 0
0.00 +-------.------~------~------~------.------~
5/l/2002 6/1/2002 7/1/2002 8/1/2002 9/1/2002 10/1/2002 11/1/2002
Dates
!!!!!!I == =-liiiiil iiiil liiiiiiil ----.. --.. .. .. .. -lliil iiiil
£
Depth to Water
RW-7
May 2002 through October 2002
';:' 40.00 +----+----------~-~--------------------------"-----'
~ ;<
8
-5 fr 30.00 +---------------------------------------------'
Cl
0.00 +---------~-------.------~------~------~-----~
5/1/2002 6/1/2002 7/1/2002 8/1/2002 9/1/2002 10/1/2002 11/1/2002
Dates
== ;;;a iiiiii liiiiii liliiil -------.. .. .. llllil iiiil liiil liiil
2
Depth to Water
RW-8
May 2002 through October 2002
70.00 ~----------------------------------------
60.00 +-------------------------------------------
';:' 40.00 +--------------"='""--------------------________ .._
~ s
% 30.00 +-----------------------------------------
8
20.00 ->------------------------------------------
10.00 +-----------------------------------------
0.00
5/1/2002 6/1/2002 7/1/2002 8/1/2002
Dates
9/1/2002
-----------·-----··--···
I 0/1/2002 I 1/1/2002
----------------
fiiiil liiiiil liiiil liiiii1 ----' ----.. .. ---iiiil iiiil
70.00
60.00
50.00
.c 1i 30.00
"' 0
20.00
10.00
0.00
5/1/2002
-"\
'
6/1/2002
Depth to Water
RW-9
May 2002 through October 2002
I
V
7/1/2002
-
8/1/2002
Dates
-\
\
9/1/2002 10/1/2002 11/1/2002
--= l!!!!!!!!I I!!!!!!! ~ ~ rm Giiil liiiiiil -.ii liiiil iiiil ---.. .. -i.....! L 4.
70.00
60.00
50.00
2
";:: 40.00
j
B
130.00
Cl
20.00
10.00
A .
0.00
5/1/2002
. A . .
/ ~
' ' V
6/1/2002
Depth to Water
RW-10
May 2001 through October 2002
/
~/
V
7/1/2002
'
8/1/2002
Dates
. . . ~
9/1/2002
. "' '\ . .. \
\
•
I 0/1/2002 11/1/2002